HomeMy WebLinkAbout20022621.tiff RESOLUTION
RE: ACTION OF THE BOARD CONCERNING CHANGE OF ZONE #613 FROM A
(AGRICULTURAL) ZONE DISTRICT TO PUD (PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT)
ZONE DISTRICT FOR EIGHT (8) LOTS WITH E (ESTATE) ZONE USES AND ONE (1)
LOT WITH A(AGRICULTURAL) ZONE USES, ALONG WITH 30.13 ACRES OF OPEN
SPACE - CATTAIL CREEK GROUP, LLC
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, pursuant to
Colorado statute and the Weld County Home Rule Charter, is vested with the authority of
administering the affairs of Weld County, Colorado, and
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on the 2nd day of October, 2002, at 10:00 a.m.
for the purpose of hearing the application of Cattail Creek Group, LLC, do George DuBard,
P.O. Box 68, Windsor, Colorado 80550, requesting a Change of Zone from the A (Agricultural)
Zone District to a PUD (Planned Unit Development) Zone District for eight (8) lots with E
(Estate) Zone uses and one (1) lot with A (Agricultural) Zone uses, along with 30.13 acres of
open space, for a parcel of land located on the following described real estate, to-wit:
Lot C of Recorded Exemption #2637; being part of
the SW1/4 of Section 9, Township 6 North, Range
66 West of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado
WHEREAS, the applicant was represented by Todd Hodges, Todd Hodges Design,
LLC, 2412 Denby Court, Fort Collins, Colorado 80526, and
WHEREAS, Section 27-6-120 of the Weld County Code provides standards for review
of said Change of Zone, and
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners heard all the testimony and
statements of those present, studied the request of the applicant and the recommendations of
the Weld County Planning Commission and, having been fully informed, finds that this request
shall be denied for the following reasons:
1. Section 27-6-120.D.5.b - The uses which would be allowed on the subject
property will not conform to the following Performance Standards:
a) Section 27-2-30 Buffering and screening - The uses and buildings or
structures within the Planned Unit Development will not be adequately
buffered and screened to make their appearance and operation
harmonious with the surrounding uses.
b) Section 27-2-35 Buffer zone or area - There is not an adequate buffer
zone or buffer area, also referred to as a transition zone, between the
proposed site and surrounding uses.
c) Section 27-2-70 Compatibility -The density, design, and location of land
uses within the Planned Unit Development are not compatible with
surrounding uses.
2002-2621
(?() ( �L PA) 1/L PL1628
/gic g12° CC7��
CHANGE OF ZONE #613 FROM A (AGRICULTURAL) TO PUD - CATTAIL CREEK GROUP,
LLC, C/O GEORGE DUBARD
PAGE 2
d) Section 27-2-74 Conservation area - The proposed use will could attract
persons to the steep slopes and riparian areas of Coalbank Creek which
could alter the integrity and character of the area.
2. Section 27-6-120.D.5.c- The development, as designed, would not be
compatible with the existing or future development of the surrounding area as
permitted by the existing Zone District and with the future development as
projected by the Comprehensive Plan or master plans of affected municipalities.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of
Weld County, Colorado, that the application of Cattail Creek Group, LLC, Go George DuBard,
for a Change of Zone from A (Agricultural) to a PUD (Planned Unit Development) Zone District
on the above referenced parcel of land be, and hereby is, denied.
The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made and seconded, adopted
by the following vote on the 2nd day of October, A.D., 2002.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
WE).D COUN OLORADO
k ��.
ATTEST: . '' I ♦ k,,,ata'9 (/, ,4,
te`-
n Vaad,Chair
t4:
Weld County Clerk to th=(o. . ..; c
V �, i I. _ ♦ David E. L g, Pro- e
BY:
Deputy Clerk to the Boni =" ';; k`ti"n / .29 &ie.,
M. J. Geile
R DASTL. S
W' lia H. Jer e oc...,.
C —
j unty Attor ey &
R ert D. Masden
Date of signature: )(lb
2002-2621
PL1628
Hello