HomeMy WebLinkAbout20021949.tiff •
PETITION TO STATE BOARD OF ASSESSMENT APPEALS For Office Use
Date: lilt}/// Zery
E/Adl € e2 C p d FTo Docket Number
PETITIONER, CIL
a�^ "C�sGr v N FEE
a of Propeny Owner
S8/ FtoJ�ent�"c ereD !G/.ca Co 80///
Street Merest City,Zip Code of Subjea Property • Cnerh No./Credit Card No.
appeals the decision of the AVELD County Board of Equalization P F H
County Neme X County Board of Commissioners
Property Tax Administrator
which was dated \r/AAE�/& 7 2007°' (check one)
This appeal concerns: Valuation For tax year(s) / 8 aril 9?
X Refund/Abatement
_ Exemption
State Assessed
(Check One) A
CONCERNING COUNTY SCHEDULE NUMBER(S): /9to 373991
If more than one schedule number is involved,please list on a separate page)
•
TYPE OF PROPERTY: This property is currently classified by the County as:
I Commercial Residential • —
(Check One) Agricultural _ Vacant Land -
_ Personal _ Other(Specify) i
ACTUAL VALUE: /99 # J 994
Actual value of subject property for year in question as set by the County$ 5O4, 71?? sae rs
co
I believe the actual value of the subject property should be$ 2100, ace: se Cf)
REPRESENTATION: Please check appropriate re nse(s)
Petitioner will be present at the hearing
Petitioner requests a telephone conference call (Petitioner will call on scheduled date at time of hearing.)
Petitioner will be represented by an agent_or a Colorado Attorney
ESTIMATED TIME FOR PETITIONER TO PRESENT THE APPEAL: 49' Minutes or Hours
Not less than 30 minutes. Board will allow equal time to Respondent.
ATTACHMENTS: The following documents MUST BE ATTACHED to your appeal in order for the Board to accept filing.
1) The decision being appealed 2) Assessors Notice of Denial OR Notice of Valuation
3) If an agent Is filing or representing you a notarized letter of authorization will be needed from the Petitioner
4) Identify the names and last known addresses and telephone numbers of other parties 'directly interested"in the petition
induding co-owners.
CERTIFICATE OF MAILING _ Copy to each person Identified In
attachment 4 above
I certify to the Board of Assessment Appeals that I have mailed or hand delivered _ County Board of Equalization
one complete copy of this appeal to the era , County Board of Commissioners
Coin Gi2EEZ&)/ , Colorado on LThalun/1. _ty Propertyx Administrator
y (check one-should be the same as the
Cdr Date
y �vt`�'� rt xy C t o
(Circle One) Agem or Attorney Petro s Signannaiure
(re
SCI Fes, al/r
Mailing Address Mali
�/�
City.Stele,Zip � f ul
c2
City,State,Zip Telephone: Telephone: 7X-2/c�1D' ?.S 2002-1949
Daytime number,please
71/1-4-0/ ± V� mot, C / As /11 05
CLERK TO THE BOARD
PHONE (970) 336-7215, Ext. 4225
FAX: (970) 352-0242
P. O. BOX 758
GREELEY, COLORADO 80632
•
COLORADO
June 12, 2002
Clean Energy LLC and Richard F. Thomas
5081 S Florence Drive
Greenwood Village CO 80111
RE: SCHEDULE NUMBER R0378594
Dear Property Owner:
On June 3, 2002, the Board of Weld County Commissioners considered your petition for
abatement or refund of taxes and denied same.
Pursuant to Section 39-2-125(f), C.R.S., you have the right to appeal this decision to the State
Board of Assessment Appeals within thirty days. You may obtain the appropriate forms and
instructions from the Board of Assessment Appeals, Department of Local Affairs, 1313
Sherman Street, Room 420, Denver, Colorado 80203.
Very truly yours,
et411d
Donald D. Warden,
Clerk to the Board
�
•
By/Ha/40 C2 -
eputy Clerk to the Board?
cc: Assessor
RESOLUTION
RE: ACTION OF THE BOARD CONCERNING PETITION FOR ABATEMENT OR REFUND
OF TAXES - CLEAN ENERGY, LLC, AND RICHARD THOMAS
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, pursuant to
Colorado statute and the Weld County Home Rule Charter, is vested with the authority of
administering the affairs of Weld County, Colorado, and
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, State of Colorado, at
a duly and lawfully called regular meeting held on the 3rd day of June, 2002, at which meeting
there were present the following members: Chair Glenn Vaad and Commissioners M. J. Geile,
William H. Jerke, David E. Long, and Robert D. Masden, and
WHEREAS, notice of such meeting and an opportunity to be present has been given to
the taxpayer and the Assessor of said County, and said Assessor, Stan Sessions, being
represented by Micheal Sampson, and taxpayer Clean Energy, LLC, and Richard Thomas, not
being present, and
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners have carefully considered the attached
petition, and are fully advised in relation thereto.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of
Weld County, Colorado, that the Board concurs with the recommendation of the assessor and
the petition be and hereby is, denied, and an abatement refund not be allowed.
The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made and seconded, adopted
by the following vote on the 3rd day of June, A.D., 2002.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
n E p WEL' NTY, COLORADO
ATTEST: Lek �,. U_/tdc'n(J
,. . Vaad, Chair
Weld County Clerk to the a �'rs 1/4 i)(fi' _ii,1 Davi E. L g, Pro-Tem
BY: •
Deputy Clerk to the Board -''-
M. J. eile
APP ED AST ORM: % 'Y/-_
,_....i-- -
e: 1Ili m . Jerk
unt Attodney 4 a.
R bert D. Masden
Date of signature: �/°
CO : 4C PP/
2001' ,aot.
AS0051
•
Complete Either Section I or Section II _
RESOLUTION OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Section 1:In accordance with 39-1-113(1.5)C.R.S.,the commissioners of County
authorize the assessor to review petitions for abatement or refund and to settle by written mutual agreement any such
petition for abatement or refund man amount of one thousand dollars or less per tract,parcel,or lot of land or per
schedule of personal property.
County Commission Resolution#
The Assessor and petitioner mutually agree to an assessed value of $ for
$ total tax for the year(s) 19_and an abatement/refund of$
PLEASE NOTE: THE TOTAL TAX AMOUNT DOES NOT INCLUDE ACCRUED INTEREST, PENALTIES,
AND FEES IF APPLICABLE, PLEASE CONTACT YOUR COUNTY TREASURER FOR FULL PAYMENT
INFORMATION.
hxa®:*nor,.. Dot
If Section I is not complete and/or if petition is for more than$1,000,Section II must be completed.
Section H: Assessors's recommendation: p/ A
o approved-No protest filed in 19_or 19
❑ approval in part$ N denied for the following reason(s): .yf S'�
Note: If a protest was filed attach D. / .�' CS��R S "�/P
2eQucJ75 2) 46 ae J1e iYowixy .e, S. /
I. 9P i S leUeA ley 6�eart� /P n P.Jl-
2, `99' Pigciv_r 6i A Ad /7-
6,4-4) Ale de RB AlSO.
•
WHEREAS, The County Commissioners of County,
State of Colorado, at a duly and lawfully called regular meeting held on the day
of , A.D. 19 , at which meeting there were present the following
members:
notice of such meeting and an opportunity to be present having been given to the taxpayer and the
Assessor of said County and said Assessor and taxpayer
m.�.i being present; and
tn.n.l
•
WHEREAS;The said County Commissioners have carefully considered the within application, and
are fully advised in relation thereto,
NOW BE IT RESOLVED, That the Board �.n.dv.a.., with the recommendation of
trot..
the assessor and the petition be , and an abatement refund
eswooidadr+e
a.Sowed Or na to Wowed'
on an assessed valuation of $ for $ total tax for the year(s) l9_.
Chairman of Board of county Cammseanai.
SLATE OF COLORADO, i
ss.
County of
, County Clerk and Ex-officio Clerk of the
Board of County Commissioners in and for the County of
State of Colorado, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing order is truly copied from the records
of the proceedings of the Board of County Commissioners for said
County, now in my office.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of said County,
at , this day of , A.D. 19
Count Perk
By
Deputy
ACTION OF THE PROPERLY TAX ADMINISTRATOR
Denver, Colorado, I9 .
The action of the Board of County Commissioners, relative to the within petition, is hereby
❑ approved:❑ approved in part $ __. . ❑ denied for the following reason(s)
staarry Property as Mn,Waaror
FORM 920(eoa3) PETITION FOR ABATEMENT OR REFUND OF TAXES oo o 3q 1 f
Must be tiled In duplicate and all questions must be answered.
d
Petitioners: Complete this side only.
E4A , Colorado, P 'fle 28; lc 200/
aye,—n
lb The Honorable Board of Commissioners of WeZ-LP 6e/Air County
Gentlemen: .IL
,r . / /J ,�!n/ e '�,,w
The petition of .ILMA f /22' AND / AA', �n-o'
whose mailing address is:
city or Town ' stele 21p Code
SCHEDULE NUMBER DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY AS LISTED ON TAX ROLL
378'S9- uG4 51c7oe 4 pP4S of 77/Z
Sd07{ DNE at/ c3/,
Tub° 7/t/ KG,e6S*JJ at TE-�
9 a i s fully guests that the taxes assessed against the above property for the years A.D.
19 , are erroneous, illegal, or due to error in valuation for the following reasons:
Describe specifically the circumstances surrounding the incorrect value or tax, including owner's
estimate of value. (Attach additional sheets if ne essary)
Zemzi G9 ,PQ/iiNt//54 7r girt r4C 9jr
d &Ve OI coo
RECEIVED
DEC 2 8 2001
WELD COUNTY ASSESSOR
GREELEY, COLORADO
19 / e 19 79
Value Tax Value Tax
Orig.
Abate.
Bal.
Therefore the petitioner requests that the taxes may be abated or refunded in the sum of S
I declare,under penalty of perjury in the second degree that this petition,together with any accompanying
exhibits or statements, has been examined by me and to the best of my knowledge, information and belief
is true, correct and complete. p (` n t
.t, Address
/(Yt%1 O �Y
ex
By Daytime phone number30 3 -i'5/52
saw sae
Every petition for abatement or refund tiled pursuant to section 39-10-114 shall be acted upon pursuant
to the provisions of this section by the board of county commissioners or the assessor,as appropriate,within
six months of the date of filing such petition. 39-1-113(1.7), C.R.S.
•
2002-1405
/ NOTICE OF DENIAL OFFICE OF COUNTY ASSESSOR
t 1400 NORTH 17th AVE.461 / ETN 14076 PT S2 31 7 65 (SUGAR GREELEY,CO 80631
�.. MILL ANNEX #2) BEG SE COR SEC PHONE(970)353-3845,EXT.3650
N88D20'W 1665' TO TRUE POB N24DW
W�`P 510' 5'E0' N12 N'W 942. 800'
N10' N29D45'W
E 130' 400' N'W 942.28' TO
S LN 4TH ST EXTENDED TH S89D58'W
COLORADO OWNER: THOMAS RICHARD F
THOMAS RICHARD F LOG 2669
5081 S FLORENCE DR PARCEL 070931300018
ACCOUNT R0378594
ENGLEWOOD, CO 80111 YEAR 1999
06/10/1999
The appraised value of property is based on the appropriate consideration of the approaches to value required by law. The Assessor has determined that
your property should be included in the following category(ies):
COMMERCIAL PROPERTY IS VALUED BY CONSIDERING THE COST, MARKET, AND INCOME
APPROACHES.
If your concern is the amount of your property tax,local taxing authorities(county,city,fire protection,and other special districts)hold budget
hearings in the fall. Please refer to your tax bill or ask your Assessor for a listing of these districts,and plan to attend these budget hearings.
The Assessor has carefully studied all available information,giving particular attention to the specifics included on your protest,and has determined the
valuation(s)assigned to your property. The reasons for this determination of value are:
NO CHANGE HAS BEEN MADE TO THE VALUATION OF THIS PROPERTY. COLORADO LAW REQUIRES
US TO SEND THIS NOTICE OF DENIAL FOR ALL PROPERTIES ON WHICH WE DO NOT ADJUST THE
VALUE.
PETITIONER'S ASSESSOR'S VALUATION
PROPERTY CLASSIFICATION ESTIMATE
OF VALUE ACTUAL VALUE ACTUAL VALUE
PRIOR TO REVIEW AFTER REVIEW
LAND 79496 79496
IMPS 425292 425292
TOTALS $ $ 504788 $ 504788
If you disagree with the Assessor's decision,you have the right to appeal to the County Board of Equalization for further consideration,39-8-
106(1)(a),C.R.S. Please see the back of this form for detailed information on filing your appeal.
06/10/1999
By Stanley F. Sessions
WELD COUNTY ASSESSOR DATE
15-DPT-AR
Form PR-207-87/99 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON REVERSE SIDE
EATON SUGAR FACTORY
PROPERTY TAX APPEAL
The attached letters represent clean-up bids on the asbestos inside of the Eaton
Sugar Factory. In addition to this cost of approximately $1,100,000 is the expense of
removal of salvage from the property and cleaning up the land and filling coal pits
and restoration of the land to utilize for development. Approximately 20 acres of the
property are covered with the spent lime from the sugar process and cannot be
utilized unless the lime is removed to grade (approximately 300,000 tons). The land
under the factory of approximately 10 acres is unusable until the deteriorated and
environmentally impacted sugar factory buildings are removed. These buildings are
filled with salvage piping and equipment and constitute an added expense, especially
since it can only be dealt with after environmental remediation of the buildings and
contents. The remaining 8 acres are covered with concrete coal pits and water
settling ponds and cannot be used for development until extensive land filling and
leveling is done. Due to these unique circumstances I am unable to rent any of the
property identified under this tax parcel and the total value of the property is a
negative value unless a user could be found to buy this property for a value
exceeding these costs.
Sincerely,
Clean En LLC
By "eiapt
chard F. homas, manager
HAZARDOUS WASTE TECHNOLOGY INC.
2802 N. PROSPECT
COLORADO SPRINGS, CO 80907
719-329-0008 I fax: 719-329-0985
February 2, 2001
Dick Thomas
5081 South Florence
Greenwood Village, CO 80111
Re: Western Sugar Mill
Dear Sir,
Hazardous Waste Technology Inc. would like to thank you for the
opportunity to view the Western Sugar Mill in Longmont. Terry
Garner with Environmental Site Assessment was conducting an
asbestos survey of the plant during our visit to assess the content of
asbestos and the extent of disturbance. If possible HWT would like
to have a copy of that report in order to properly evaluate and
propose a Cost for clean-up for the property. Based on our site
inspection, the level of contamination and given the condition of the
buildings, our estimate for the abatement would be approximately
$ 1,250,000.00.
Hazardous Waste Technology has been in the abatement industry for
over 15 years and has the experience in abatement of large scale projects of
this nature. We have received numerous letters from business owners,
Government officials, and been requested by the EPA for environmental
cleanup projects. We look forward to hearing from you and welcome any
questions you may have concerning this or other projects you may have.
Res ectfully Submitted,
-�Y%A
Gene Meek
Res
Vice President HWT
• • flOu "_ ' 94 1 g, : :.10 FPO'1 SCH,.1 IEP 'Log' Ft=:'3':'!: . PAGE . 001
.....ip r ,,:‘,.....,,,, _
& :IATI , ray:.
ENVIPONMFNTAI SERVICES
November 11, 1994
Richard Thomas
Owner
Thomas Real Estate Company
5081 South Florence Drive
Englewood, CO 80111
Dear Richard:
This letter is in response to your request to update the asbestos abatement
figures for your Western Sugar facility and they are as follows:
T • costs associated with the general clean-up of the facility amount to a total
of cne hundred ten thousand five hundred and 96o dollars ($110,500.00).
► The costs assodated with the remediation of the Asbestos Containing
Materials (ACM) required prior to the demolition of the facility which includes
the Boiler room (not including the demolition) amount to a total of one
million one hundred fourteen thousand and %o dollars ($1,114,000.00).
After you have had an opportunity to review this matter, should you have any
comments, questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to call me personally.
coyly,
5ttes
Jo . Scha
dent
•
5960 South 13th Strut • P.O. Box 28$ 15403 East 17th Avenue "6-
Oak Creek, Wisconsin 53164 Aurtma, Colorado 80011
(414) 768.7240 • Pax (414) 764.2086 (303) 367-0702 • Fax (303) 367-1301
f: W NI. f
�\ r
Yom! �!%r..%
AV)
nillailliS
ellahimmimmod: • ' ' 'tr. Z #.a.'—'''.."
...
.._
,. , ,
;!, ,.,..____„..
,. .. . .
. _
- ciI IT 1,. a ® ��� 7 r _
, •
�.ic
`
C .
I� Pte''
r!
i
l \\
-
r ,v 4 '
..
IL
4 e -
R f
- ' ,".
-g ,....
1
40
I1 .. ... , ,
,....? ..„.._
4 ..,
,. ,
.r. .
..
,. .
. .
. , , .. ,
A.
\ E t ssr.'s
`
4 "
I.
_ ::k - t�7: ? '
tai" '₹
e f ‘
sS;
•
--'" r
't43
F
•
V
•
! H
I, ,
• . � I
M
S 1
T _-.
'',`, �
IV
N
IS
•
G } f
6w , \
Hello