The URL can be used to link to this page

Browse Search

Home My WebLink About840083.tiff_ .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. AR1992704 N O 00 0 ~ RESOLUTION Q o a RE : GRANT CHANGE OF ZONE FROM AGRICULTURAL TO PLANNED UNIT o g DEVELOPMENT (RESIDENTIAL-ONE AND AGRICULTURAL USES) - TWOMBLY o a RANCH in- [17 a WHEREAS , the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, pursuant to Colorado statute and the Weld County Home N Rule Charter, is vested with the authority of administering the affairs of Weld County, Colorado, and rig WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on the 7th day of November, 1984 , at 2 : 00 o' clock p.m. for the purpose of hearing the application of Twombly Ranch, c/o James Erger, 7290 Magnolia o Street, Commerce City, Colorado 80022 , requesting a Change of Zone H from Agricultural to Planned Unit Development (Residential-One and N F Agricultural Uses) for a parcel of land located on the following ,—icn described real estate, to-wit: CD Section 7 , Township 1 North, Range 64 West of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado 2 ° WHEREAS, Section 21 . 6 . 2 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance o provides standards for review of such a Change of Zone, and ua z 5 WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners heard all of the M N testimony and statements of those present, studied the request of cn M the applicant and the recommendations of the Weld County Planning 0 o Commission, and co c WHEREAS, only four Commissioners were present at this hearing, and the vote taken resulted in a tie; therefore, it was determined that the absent Commissioner, John Martin, would listen to the tapes concerning this hearing and cast the deciding vote on November 21 , 1984 , and WHEREAS, at the hearing of November 21 , 1984 , Commissioner Martin cast a favorable vote and it was determined that this request be approved for the following reason: 1 . It is the opinion of the Board of Weld County Commissioners that this application does meet the required criteria of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, that the application of Twombly Ranch, c/o James Erger, 7290 Magnolia Street, Commerce City, Colorado 80022 , for a Change of Zone from Agricultural to Planned Unit Development (Residential-One and Agricultural Uses) on the above referenced parcel of land be, and hereby is, EP 8C) 840083 N O 0 U 0 approved, subject to the covenants being considered as the (NO conditions. U wThe above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made O and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the 21st day of o x November, A.D. , 1984 . yr W a x r BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS o ATTEST - WELD COUNTY j > � ' COLORADO 0Weld CnRecorder _ _ (NAY) and C1N Norman Carlson, Chairman BY: -IZ OC1 �C� , LAN (NAY) m J u+N9_, ne J.hn.on, Pro-Tem o z Deput �, o erk N H APPROVED AS TO FORM: (AYE) N H Gene R�Brantnr (AYE) H `� �/�E2�c�� Qrison& Z County Attorney Ail�T /17212 (AYE) O1 z hn T. Martin tKC 0 Ua, M M ++1M 0 v' H0 M Summary of the Weld County Planning Commission Meeting September 18, 1984 - age 2 The Chairman called for discussion from the audience. There was none. The Chairman asked that reading of the recommendations of the Department of Planning Services staff be dispensed with and that they be filed with the minutes as a permanent record of these proceedings. MOTION: Sharon Linhart moved the proposal from School District Six for a new Chappelow Middle School be accepted by the Planning Commission. Motion seconded by Lydia Dunbar. �e Chair an caned for , scussion from .-.....cars of Commission. Discussion followed. The Chairman asked the secretary to poll the members of the Planning Commission for their decision. Louis Rademacher — yes; Bill McMurray yes; Sharon Linhart - yes; Steven Hamilton - yes; Paulette Weaver - yes; Doug Graff - yes; Lydia Dunbar - yes; Jack Holman - yes; Bob Ehrlich yes. Motion carried unanimously. LASE NUMBER: Z-409:84:10 APPLICANT: E.B.I. Corporation (Economy Lumber) REQUEST: A Change of Zone from "I-3" (Industrial-Three) to "C-3" (Commercial-Three) LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of Lot 8 and the vacated 27th Street Road of Arlington Gardens Subdivision; located in part of Section 17, T5N, R65W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado LOCATION: 500 27th Street, Greeley; south and adjacent to Garden City The Chairman called for representation. There was none. Therefore, the third item on the agenda will be considered by the Planning Commission. CASE NUMBER: Z-407:84:8 X APPLICANT: Twombly Ranch, c/o Jim Erier REQUEST: A Change of Zone from "A" (Agricultural) to "P.U.D." (Planned Unit Development), Large Lot Residential and Agricultural Uses -LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Section 7, T1N, R64W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado LOCATION: Approximately two miles east of Hudson; south of State Highway 52 and east of Weld County Road 49 APPEARANCE: -Bob Fleming who assisted the applicant in preparing the case and Jim Erger, -representative, stated their porposal is to divide this 640 acre parcel into thirteen lots. It is their feeling they are not taking farm land Summary of the Weld County Planning Commission Meeting September 18, 1984 Page 3 • from production. This is not irrigated land, and they have no water rights. As far as they can determine this land has never been irrigated. A map was presented by the applicants to show the many divisions of land in the area; they felt division of this land would conform to other land in the area because of this. Tape 174 - Side 1 All lots in the proposed Planned Unit Development would be over forty acres with the exception of one. It is their feeling the use of the land would remain primarily agricultural. There are a few lots which lie in the flood plain, but it will only take a foot or two of fill-dirt to create a building site. The Division of Water Resources has ruled that domestic wells would be available for water. Sewage disposal would be by individual septic tanks. The Chairman called for discussion from the audience. Larry Rogstad, District Wildlife Manager, State of Colorado, Division of Wildlife, stated they had mailed a letter to the Planning Commission explaining they are against this proposal because they are worried about a loss of wildlife in the area. In the spring and fall this area is used as a resting and staging area for migrating waterfowl. Pheasant and several species of duck, nongame birds, and mammals use it as a nesting area. Both Mule and White-Tailed deer migrate through and feed on this property. He also drew to the Planning Commission's attention that lots one through six lie within the one hundred years flood plain of the Horsecreek Reservoir Dam. If this should collapse people and property in the area would be in serious jeopardy. Tom Lynch, State of Colorado, Division of Wildlife, District Wildlife Manager, also expressed his concerns for wildlife in the area and the dangers of developing land in the flood plain of Box Elder Creek and the dangers which may be imposed to residents of this area if the Horse— creek Reservoir Dam should break. Robert Swank, surrounding property owner., spoke in opposition to this request. The Chairman asked Rod Allison to read the recommendtions of the Depart— ment of Planning Services staff into the record. The Planning staffs' recommendation is for denial. Sharon Linhart read a letter she had received from Mrs. Ray Guest, a surrounding property owner. Lee Morrison felt this type of correspondence should be routed to the Department of Planning Services staff rather than to a member or members of the Planning Commission. He stated Sharon did handle this properly by bringing it to the Planning Commission's attention. Summary of the Weld County Planning Commission Meeting September 18, 1984 Page 4 • Lee Morrison read the Planning Commission's duties for reviewing this case from the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. MOTION: Doug Graff moved Case Number Z-407:84:8 from the Twombly Ranch for a Change of Zone from Agricultural to Planned Unit Development for large lot residential and agricultural use be forwarded to the Board of County Commissioners with the Planning Commission's recommendation for denial based upon the testimony heard by the Planning Commission and the recommendation of the Department of Planning Services staff. Motion seconded by Paulette Weaver. ,. _ .nnan :ailed sion. Discussion followed. The Chairman asked the secretary to poll the members of the Planning Commission for their decision. Louis Rademacher - yes, while he realizes this is not good farm land, he is afraid with the land divided into plots it will become cluttered with debris and just grow-up into weeds. Bill McMurray - no; Sharon Linhart - yes; Stephen Hamilton - yes; Paulette Weaver - yes; Doug Graff - yes; Jack Holman - Yes, it is his feeling residential development should take place around existing towns and cities so services may be provided that are usually requested by home- owners in these areas. Bob Ehrlich - yes. Motion carried with eight voting for the motion and one voting against the motion. Tape 174 - Side 2 CASE NUMBER: Z-409:84:10 APPLICANT: E.B.I. Corporation (Economy Lumber) REQUEST: A Change of Zone from Industrial-Three to Commercial-Three LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of Lot 8 and vacated 27th Street Road of Arlington Gardens Subdivision; located in part of Section 17, T5N, R65W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado LOCATION; 500 27th Street, Greeley; south and adjacent to Garden City APPEARANCE: David Stookesberry, Vice—President, Economy Lumber Company, Inc. , reported E.B.I. Corporation is now Greeley Economy Lumber and Hardware, Inc. He stated it was not their intent to circumvent any County requirements pertaining to their new building. When they applied for their industrial revenue bonds, they had to have a letter from the County stating that they were in compliance with the zoning. He obtained such a letter and their industrial revenue bonds were approved with that letter, and their building permit was issued. The people who issued the letter and the building permit felt that Industrial-Three zoning was proper for a business 3669 Weld County Rd 45 Hudson, CO 80642 November 5, 1984 Mike S. Mullins Dept of Planning Services 915 10th St Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Mr. Mullins: This letter is to support development of the Twombly Ranch (Z-407-84-8) . We believe that the change from agricultural zoning to PUD will be consistent with other uses in the area. Since the development of Twombly Ranch will remain agricultural (12 of the 13 divided acreages are at least 40 acres) , we do not feel that the general agricultural environment and situation will be negatively affected. On the contrary, we believe that allowing the change to PUD will enhance the value of the area. Thank you for your consideration in this matter. Sincerely, Leslie K. Stewart-Phelps amen W. Phelps [ ° : 1984 --- Weld Co. Nam* Commission November 5 , 1984 Board of Commissioners County of Weld 915 10th Street Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Commissioners : We are writing to you to express our concern about a proposed change of zoning for Twombly Ranch, two miles Fast of Hudson. Our family has lived and owned farms in the Hudson, Keensburg and Prospect Valley area for many years . We are in favor of this type of development, as it will be very beneficial for the entire area. This in our opinion, keeps the area rural , but allows people -to own a small farm. We urge you to vote in favor of the Twombly Ranch. Yours truly, y21/ 4z-477 Fred and Nanacy Hubbs Route 1 Box 50 Bennett, CO 80102 A_ ? 1-!( 774v *z, /foray ,,,,-,t�1 �..r .� �( j"� 1 WLCe 21.-7,1„c.c t -/-iltecrL_e" acv 4,42 'L a- 1O-O-P--,o-eti � i9Yy $3vzzyt c( 0-‘ al --2renz4 jkeLd � & ate 0 d - of 2 c �2 Cyr po�r7 zP. -6�e. at/cm!) ,--Le a y( c <�� in l�� `�L c ti� GL J acte--(1-E/Lx11_, 07te-( l3 _,C.t.-7-u_. c _ 6)00- tc, Cl atOeo ,.bu-c��F e r r��J ,Z12-c> ,nce-72 /L4zz 0%a J 60pp,�,to—pant. A c.e 9 n ee �J z4z.L zieto-e_ D-r-m -Lt, ilte5-2 e .A.V9/7-0t t X.e ef/Zeii 0 tizet,t aacoL ±tah-L_) 2 e, . Cd Lto , JhC- Ottete ) VJ-r2.2,t6-Cch2 P _' CSC Q Q 7 t1 1/24C,c,,l . } .,ate 2 t ✓.,L c.e.u-)---1 y.\`AzeJ oUx ii-c e-t, /L.owe:cc SI So o, 00 E�2Jp c��ru.t u �� ze >20-tz.I LC ,,ei.c�.t it t 1oJu� jiet /� d ,ate ctioLo tz-en:Led t� SO o. 6o f1.o>-)-1_1 ta2.1t2 -2 4 'Ac�aan Cu BOARD OF EDUCA' WAYNE DUN,.EF Fres. ALAN BURRY Pre: JANET CARLSON, Sec IVAN OST ER,Trevs. IVAN LINNEBUR,Asst. SeCy Weld County School District Rs-3(J) BOB C. GUDKA, Supt. DALE L. RECKARD,Asst. Supt. KEENESBURG, COLORADO 80643 October 10, 1984 James Erger Beeper & Co. 729D Magnolia St. Commerce City, Co. 80022 Dear Jim, Enclosed is copies of the formal agreement that was agreed on verbally September 12, 1984. Would you please see that the agreement is signed by the proper people and return one of the copies to our office. Please feel free to contact me for further information. Sincerely, ' 1 o(V�e.Bob C. Gudk-a _\ Superintendent BG/de AGREEMENT This Agreement made this 12th day of September , 1984, between Ronald A. Cook and Lloyd Land, Owners and James Erger, Developer, hereinafter the "Developer" and Keenesburg School District Re-3, hereinafter the "District". WHEREAS, the Developer has embarked upon a proposed development described as, Twombly Ranch, Section 7, TIN, R64W of the 6th -P.M. , Weld County, Colorado and hereinafter referred to -as the "Project", and WHEREAS, the Developer and the District have determined that carrying out the terms of this Agreement will prove mutually beneficial to the Developer and the District. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the preceding and the mutual -covenants herein it is agreed as follows: 1. Within ten (10) days after the sale of each parcel within the Project, the Developer -shall pay to the District an amount equal to one-half of the District's authorized revenue base per pupil of attendance entitlement for the year in which the sale i-s completed, as such term is determined and defined in the Public School Finance Act of 1973. In the event such Act is modified in a manner that renders the term "authorized revenue base per pupil of attendance entitlement" inappropriate for use ±n this -Agreement, the parties shall negotiate a successor amcjnt, but in no -event shall such successor amount be less than that computed r the previous year. 2. The Distri-ct shall not object -to or oppose formally -of informally approval and completi-on of the Project as currently planned and projected and shall not bring any suit or action to enjoin or interfere with the Project as currently planned and projected. The District shall allow the Developer to utilize accurate information regarding the District's educational programs in promotions and advertisement-s for the Project and shall cooperate to provide such information to the Developer. 3. This Agreement shall be binding upon the successors, assigns and heirs to the parties hereto. 4. In the event either party hereto shall fail to -perform in accordance with the covenants of the Agreement, the other party may compel such performance in any court -of competent jurisdiction and the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover, in addition to any -damages -and to any specific performance ordered, all costs and reasonable attorney fees incurred in enforci-ng the Agreement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parites hereto have sat their -hands and seals on the date first above written. cgila Owner w ' rte Deve r Owner X t Boa sident 13 .LaLAM w ra 11 R34- Date Ife auJtJ), B.a d Secretary a 4444 (QaaA,at v LA2 ctAs „A_LseetaA.aocz ..6 Ltwaee.A_, 4I a.caL atit /a,L, CL atax_rfi, test at,47-4 AnAcia44 -ex-A / 7 dK i / Yt , 1/4.14/ eil zStz 6 API v - ! �u ete.A.,4 �u //� Lie_et_a,eaa .� - L p ate,-te, - - �.t ov a mot., ` y vot.cttat .�.� eacc.4. \, L2_vac 5z2eA.6 444640 C • . . Lam VIA4A s ( ate., a, ti ya,Laye1tt4 „tite Lbyd. J444Letatz L,6(z2.6 ,z()ac ed wc-) t.pa a a.,4mva L21LL' pow dap- ,2.4Acied Lit-e-44 cz4JS y_a4L.L Litt .c .cam Leit4- 6111_, y�CLcJ QQ __ _e effi-X-di-dtCACI,i!7‘4;CJ a!;11 pow tiep oel‘w tsii „ tic si /(6Lete/yizigfu4, / 9F/ Qom_ c_tA)-L2:z%-c, �c U �Q �lh o� ,/a r � Vic.- .&r J nt i L---(61,4_ Li/ o`v L7_14. A a�Q G� d a-e}-8-1 dl tam �� Ct aeL � ahp i i t L-u&-t-c tt t -E-a-c c f z CA�2 cry eLam/ I a-c v—C,, PAZ(_itzt_i `- - �d� `� 4. og - -- - Q tie n t t (fix t. °d/ Q,h.e Gl7o- ‘2_2 c__%4A ,.z e, AgLettz &eN I L-- fLi -L. ., si(C ✓{.h ,7,..',,.y- r 4t.2ezSz<._ei�y may' �,/-.:yyam":: -' "' 5 -Y, c-t l- u L : d G - C E`i/e ZadA ll�4ef/ -; � �, . C � ., vf� ��j'��Lt<r,�.^,c, q/J ' r z!��° ` ` �, // 1 , 1 1' 1;17' 3/4/_, (//L dLL,, tri, alsn P--s ' ,1/(, t PETITION WE, the undersigned support C 0 Z 407:84:8 request by TWCMBLY RANCH for; a change of zone from Agricultural to Planned Unit Development on a parcel of land described as Section 7, TIN, R64W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County Colorado. NAME ADDRESS DATE /i r ) ; { ' _ , v L, •�d _' he '/,/ / .' ,n `r , 7 ±-0,-, t, c,-) ) ) , . ) _S. r r t :-:7 :� i ) 7 67, 3 -2, za%�GI^'fir —a—s/7//e LX/ ) -,29-Psz J4 ��:- .,.:_.4�� ) �\ 0 a..qL 3354,1 (4 lq JO- .;� �i -8�/ L/a„Jjl illa4/�)/,z izz b et /O-/r u/,a,Y' (o c1' /n -La i� /En 1,/(L(J 4,/ , / ; /JLC,-,/i— // :"/—IV rt X ( V) ,�<�y Bi/'r/7 s/ /9 -3/`c9! —5� /777/x. Lucie g /o -.5/ - F/1 ,/n �4ri• } /77/6 /,%._,7 F' /a /R'/. �I0 P0. 13(9, d3 > in- w- C''/ cx-- . v� 'rt -1/ /5 '6 /2-0 I /2 n,, - 3/- /J�y/� lit/trig/ 11 e k— 12. U. ix 2,22, </0 .7 v''' T -16,42-471-4-71 ,0,.-,- 1 q 4, 4-o L7 2. , i + /D - 3/ --At 1 t-,., z-- f , , Z V"v v iv' (21.- '// c /O 3/- Y `/ d4Let ',X5,-..- (57/ kfiC 4 /e) - C/- 5 7‘ Cilp %e-41- s v /v57/ ifieIC 5`/ /D 3/--;17 s, -C)) /f f (.-Cr2 �c , rt',Lg9 /1 i il b10,,, S �g � ��C.ti ter/ 7 ;,, L /fal 'tr. /(,.. / " - �. Joy) 4C/c.t `e ,,/e .7/ - ,-t ( 2.:iI l 351c75 w`R 4-71 //— / ---'11 ' Z 1f,' re-Jew 7 // -/ - ex - r - 1' 9-2Z y 4f. (2 72 //- / - Fr C N . 7/ ._7>79-.)3tgAln /I // -/ - djT om/ /; .�>../7, ya/rs- 4,692,k/ //-7- e 7 Cd�„�27 �� 36276 &id /,P /7-/_ ry 77 eegrt, `(4 € //Lf S O COCA' ,C-7 // -/ -s`/ C ; 1 r/ ta,,/ /�4., , /i z— //-7-3 V G ur fr'itt3i-u Iri ri> // -/-JV C74v� --( '> ( /',// //- / .k7. J / \ ,c. ! 1 t, _ `, ; ( i' /' : 11 / / / - 1 1 i ( 1 8. IV- is v I1 I - I 524 417 )) 13'3ei HP y S-Z -/�.,� /clap /iie/P <// r;'/u ,(J �,/yz-, �a. =Li`iX/4.t',e' /79 // 2 -4`/ �ti ic 2333'4ih,tct30 1\ — `-1 1PETITION WE, the imrlersigied support C 0 2 407:84:8 request by TWOMBLY RANCH for; - a change of zone from Agricultural to Planned Unit Development on a parcel of laid,G3Pscribed as _Section 7, TIN, T264W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County Colorado. ADDRESS DATE t\K),_\ �. .$ Thy--F I-aLz '_ .vCV&,\ ��,,e, vv\ \ (MA 14- G 7/ 447C 4// r/ La r-... 7i -096 -'.sac: w tiY rc ) z-V74s 1-„ . . L.. c7.\i....tx,� !/ 3 `� c � G`A.. c1 6 G_t R� sat, .� - ///l/Y`� il, 2X17 WYc/ P ./I /. //1/27%/ ` 171c 4 n L ( . 5-6,;2 - '93 9 (�` jcii./:vsn NA hr J Pc), Sou J/y[ Ism �c-i /fi //e fie/ C .� - / -62,-C9 f-� Q vi ) .! ai /1 M gs/e eel /p 1 tom,/ r \ /y4/�' �'n&7)tC L/i „a472..-- /` / /t a a /7-6 - 'i/ai-, 4 / 5 I- w. C , RAP. 6 /J e,i4, 11-1-n- ' c A 6/, -, -,, 2,/7 t,,/'Y hr6ti u, e—g c 7 /yon, ' 4C -8-?- . Cc ! - .�,..O G i� 3 3 S--G, 4 we g t Li (<o a.e, //-- co -- PETITION WE, the undersigned support C 0 Z 407:84:8 request by TWOMBLY RANCH for; a change of zone from Agricultural to Planned Unit Development on a parcel of land described as Section 7, TIN, R64W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County Colorado. NAME ADDRESS DATE l'l� c� a 016/0/M 6 3 / Y — ••-Z -v PETITION WE, the undersigned support C 0 Z 407:84:8 request by TWOMBLY RANCH for; a change of zone from Agricultural to Plc:tuned Unit Development on a parcel of land described as Section 7, TIN, R64W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County Colorado. NAME // ADDRESS DATE v I�iu+r .11 t/7 //c 47 7/ %frcnes64� //-� id AFFIDAVIT I , Elizabeth Martin, being first sworn, certify that I have circulated the attached petition and that each signature was duly affixed to each petition. Elizaeth Martin ( SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this /// day of November, 1984 . My commission expires: ( ,c / %//c 6, Notary Public r -ii PETITION WE, the undersigned support C 0 Z 407:84:8 request by "IWOMBLY RANCH for; a change of zone from Agricultural to Planned Unit Development on a parcel of land described as Section 7, TIN, R64W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County Colorado. NAM ADDRESS DATE (/,;,c i i., <4- --1 ,2 :4 ,s �- t/ /-0-- -� (7- /, ' — Sqq �4, c ( SL.- rc . (icy `f ` Hy s � C1rals¢ Ke,-,-ti...i - y7tt e- ie 2, y7 �` r , rk,,,.-, r . -j , , 477 la ' /l ' �) �� 1 l/`2 / ,% �' .s�� tic. / 7e--x ,1, - c -,.,_3'cl 712;j, �i- �/ c .� fL-/, ' /.4 ,;- 2V7- ,- / q/// /C , lo 4 /,S'_ JM. / ca- ,✓ /Y. 7 �. ��4L- f,y- -t-)7 R' y/ 7� ‘" /C, 2 / X 7/ •�\k. ,,,„ , c\,\,t\ .;� -7x,,f Lit-",Q. .:>>c;4; fV,H _. IG _ S cI el (�K r ll /-56- 4 1 > 1- � ,: ,.s 9 '/e/4- SY / 4-s K. $1 w ,z.-,. 33,"/ /':k // - )1/' -j v c 7.7��,.".."Ma �1'a�jv., taxCti .,Er tea r. O I- 9 .c2 1 , 1 i J a4 a-.4,-/ 95e6- 6,/ v77 9 e7 (� //1 �z(.1 C,x .?.3 2 /f4(/ ---t // - S- by >y't,l c V. i-r j.� (j.„.97/2-7 J,i',� - , / �rr�� //- ,,2 -- �' - _t`'L `J�) \- Y.'9 ?¢,r�ityt72.,' // — <D - jay +-t'1,A-y. ay s'et /7`-.7E;�,c // c -Y4, - , i-7-,/, / //1'‘/ �'.A-v- n, >14,,,C46--2-t. 5 V — � ' -9 ? .� / {41--lei iD,� Ps.6,O/A/� -- _ 0c ? (r - :1 A. c 70 .). : '44/t 6 - - F5` Z. -<i -R 17 �< // - - e - I _C �_'± y Y/'G� r `f7J - / -7'%� 0/l &-cc ,-c, // - S y f�7 7 d ., Ad:tee : 7-?; Lc/-t <-765 /7!‘".e... .,' , r //-6 -(5-'7 � : .. . 99L/ K / / ("c /r , Qf ‘A )2C v'Rn,)( 95 / fl. ozb0-n OL - ,/ - i-. - 'k'N PETITION WE, the undersigned support C 0 Z 407:84:8 request by TWOMBLY RANCH for; ' a change of zone from Agricultural to Planned Unit Development on a parcel of land described as Section 7, TIN, R64W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County Colorado. NNE ADDRESS DATE tc)-1 /%" --7,-(1-1-4-,7 //3 iaice-i-7._(� //A-735-77, `v . -.24 � __()G k•��1, / 4;/ cy t� �� //�, i /iii ,sy /7/h - S' -ze 7- t/l___ /5-(�._,_ f`/.;7 C.,-iiie ///Ii.KG"2L• /� -ne f .� 92o /9. I/-- -�</ Litiv—_o %,J Y%W-t', if .3 0 0- l/-Z, -A% 5/ ` f/ it , Abp -Cr�6 &l /l - 6- s/ /Julie ea C. .L-t -'c6 (?,-///,, // -1 — W /00 ,49it-c 3 /v l // -G -try- 1:O5 t ,- /2 12/ c / / 3 7 64,n--7 ii - 7- .,?7 L-6; c,, '7 't , < < �,,, ' - s 7 c k,,,,y f i, - 7 - S y - 4,/±t er -2Z-r? N. /<17 ,e5ed, %9-. 0/77/e7 P E T I T I O N WE, the undersigned support C 0 Z 407:84:8 request by TWOMBLY RANCH for; - a change of zone from Agricultural to Planned Unit Development on a parcel of land described as Section 7, TIN, R64W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County Colorado. NAME ADDRESS DATE • vS� Nu�� C ///5 1� iii f'. . ' )Y�� / �E'_CC 7/ d PETITION WE, the undersigned support C 0 Z 407:84:8 request by TWOMBLY RANCH for; a change of zone from Agricultural to Planed Unit Development on a parcel of land described as Section 7, TIN, R64W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County Colorado. NAME ADDRESS DATE 01 K. Uic I I f��1 --L( Cue Nc titr `4 Le . _ -6 75_ 4774,(76,,..� . �y3 /412, �� vet!r d-I18i/ AFFIDAVIT I , Patricia A. Cook, being first sworn, certify that I have circulated the attached petition and that each signature was duly affixed to each petition. Patricia A. Cook SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this %OLf` day of November, 1984 . My commission expires : Notary, is 111Z ,A7A TER CONSULTANTS, IN 0 13'50 INDEPENDENCE STREET SUITE 3-A LAKEWOOD, COLORADO 80215 -HARLAN W. ERKER (303) 232-5859 CONSULTANTS IN ROBERT D. TAFELSKI HYDROGEOLOGY AND STEPHEN R. PALMER July 6, 1984 WATER RESOURCES Jim Erger 84006-01 Leeper & Company 7290 Magnolia Street Commerce City, Colorado 80022 Re: Ground Water Availability Twombly Ranch Property Dear Mr. Erger: As requested, we have made an evaluation of the availability of ground water beneath the Twombly Ranch property. According to the information given to us, the property encompasses all of Section 7, Township I North, Range 64 (Vest, for a total of 640 acres (see Figure 1). The Laramie-Fox Hills aquifer is one of four deep, non-tributary aquifers which occur in the Denver Basin. Because the property is located near the northeast edge of the basin, the Laramie-Fox Hills is the only bedrock aquifer which occurs below the property area. This aquifer is generally considered "non-tributary" because the ground water from this aquifer is neither in direct contact, nor contributes to the surface water system of Box Elder Creek and the South Platte River. Data from well logs and completion reports for deep wells in the vicinity of the subject property indicate that the Laramie-Fox Hills aquifer occurs between approximately 680 feet and 780 feet below ground surface, and that the saturated sand thickness of the aquifer is approximately 90 feet. The specific yield used in this evaluation is the latest value utilized by the State Engineer's Office as of June 21, 1984. This value is 15%. The following formula was used to determine the amount of water available from the Laramie-Fox Hills aquifer: Saturated Allowable Property Specific Sand Annual Area x Yield x Thickness Appropriation = (acres) (fraction) (feet) (acre-feet) 100 years This formula is based upon the criteria set forth in Section 37-90-137 (4) Colorado Revised Statutes, 1973, otherwise known as Senate Bill 213 (S.B. 213). Also taken into consideration were non-tributary ground water rights existing on or near the subject property prior to the enactment of S.B. 213 which could reduce the allowable appropriation from the Laramie-Fox Hills for the property. Our research indicated that there were no pre-S.B. 213 ground water rights on or near the property, which could reduce the amount of water available from the Laramie-Fox Hills aquifer. According to the above formula, the total amount of water available to the property from the Laramie-Fox Hills is 8640 acre-feet, which may be appropriated at a rate of 86 acre-f :et per year. Mr. Jim Erger July 6, 1984 Page 2 Water quality data reported in the U.S.G.S. Water Supply Paper, No. 1658, indicate that the quality of water from the Laramie-Fox Hills aquifer is of fair to good quality and suitable for public supply and domestic use. A water quality analysis should be made upon completion of drilling to determine the quality for the planned uses. As per the information provided, it is understood that the property is to be subdivided into 13 lots. Twelve of these lots are to contain 40 acres or more. The remaining lot will consist of 2.6 acres. It appears that the best approach to provide water for the 12 large lots would be to drill a Laramie-Fox Hills well for each lot. For the small 2.6 acre lot, a Laramie-Fox Hills well could be drilled but it would be restricted to in-house domestic use only. The possibility also exists of using an existing well to supply the small lot. This well, which is located in the NW-,' , NW4 of the section, is apparently a shallow well completed in the Box Elder Creek alluvium. No permit exists, however, late registration should be explored with the possibility of piping the water from the well to the 2.6 acre lot. Whichever of these alternatives is pursued, a water supply can be obtained for this lot. In summary, available information indicates that water of acceptable quality can physically be obtained from the Laramie-Fox Hills from beneath the property. The entitlement as per Senate Bill 213 would be approximately 86 acre-feet of water per year. This amount would be ample for the proposed uses. If you have any questions regarding this matter or wish additional information, please do not hesitate to call. Very truly yours, HRS WATER CONSULTANT , INC. Robert D. Tafelski Vice President RDT/kjp it ; 1 c:', ' 2 (, , ,i LEGEND _ - __ , _ ___ _ E -k- SATURATED THICK ® 4934 � L�� NESS CONTOUR WITH a` THICKNESS IN FEE. 1M. 0 1000 2000 3000 Ire? d SCALE IN FEET Rea No S4te) e_e 4 i' �--•e LIMIT OF ALLUVIUM o III '-',.\- \.. � f 6 TWOMBLYRANCH 11 _ 1 O PROPERTY BOUNDARY 'Sc IC �� / i ° e _ ��. _ a3 v 1 \', !, ___-- / v.en O 12 well ' / / 4373 O (v 7 ` ;-./ ;, � g/ TIN ��'` Ire a E \\ ] c''" CI h,I9.); 1 all , ,C,( / Al 1 - y I Ia�� 3\ /icria, \��,I$y\\\ 4%, / \ " i' \ N., V I' �� " Spy \ Well °�� \ � \ 13 18/ 1 �� i � o vTWOMBLYRANCH ---; \ 0699 Well • \\ LOCATION MAP SHOWING f."\ 4998 PROPERTY BOUNDARY AND SATURATED Ii THICKNESS OF ALLUVIUM HRS WATER CONSULTANTS, INC. FEBRUARY, 1984 84006-01 R65 W R64W ., ._. -- _ -` sue..» �. �i �. r� _ .7 24545 Hwy 52 Hudson, CO 80642 tober 27, 1984 lD colir77v Weld County Commissioners P.O . Box 7{8 Greeley, CO 80631 ' O�g3 c' 1984 Weld County Commissioners : I am opposed to any zoning change of Section 7 of Township 1 North, Range 64 West, referred to as Twombly Ranch. I own property north and adjacent to the Twombly Ranch, with approximately 3/4 of a mile fronting the property. During the past 16 years, I have seen the farm ground in Section 7 produce some very high yields . The ground is of the same high quality as Section 8 , that boarders it to the -east as well as Section 6 to the north. This year my dry land in Section 6 produced over 50 bushels per acre wheat with Section 8 reportedly having greater than 60 bushels per acre . With irrigation water, that could be purchased by including the ground in the Henrylyn District , when it becomes available, this farm would be prime irrigated ground. Our county government has seen fit to protect the county from "leapfrog" development and speculation with the inactment of the Comprehensive Plan in September of 1973. This plan was designed to maintain Weld County as an agricultural county and has given the county the number two position in the country in agricultural production, second only to a county in California. This is something we can be proud of. I would hope that the County Commissioners would not allow speculation of prime agricultural land for development of non-agricultural uses . I therefore urge you not to allow the proposed change of zone. Respectfully submitted, RUSSELL J. HAYES OFFICE OF BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PHONE(303)356-4000, EXT. 4200 P.O. BOX 758 GREELEY,COLORADO 80632 O September 24 1984 COLORADO �'r�G c11,. ,, Twombly Ranch c/o James Erger SEP 2 71984 7290 Magnolia Street Commerce City, Colorado 80022 Dear Mr. Erger: The application of Twombly Ranch for a Change of Zone from Agri- cultural to Planned Unit Development (Residential-One and Agri- cultural Uses) has been recommended unfavorably to the Board of County Commissioners by the Planning Commission. The legal de- scription of the property involved is shown as Section 7 , Township 1 North, Range 64 West of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado. If you wish to be heard by the Board of County Commissioners, it will be necessary for you to indicate your request by signing the bottom of this letter and returning it to this office . Regular hearing procedures will then be followed. This includes publish- ing a Notice of Hearing in the legal newspaper, an expense to be paid by you. In order to proceed as quickly as possible, we must receive your reply by October 10 , 1984 . If we are not in receipt of your re- quest by that date, the matter will be considered closed. Sincerely, BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY, COLORADO Norman Carlson, Chairman I wish to have a hearing on this matter brought before the Board of County Commissioners . I agree to pay for the legal advertising expense. N . . , , , . � , m � ! -P-co : I . I 2 f $ � I - E I| P 0 , ( 2 mCCO 01 ° ` e: co QC 5 E3 / . � � � \ 2 § ; 552 ` Qg \ , \ \& y. 6® 2 A % ~ " > - \ / }\ \ w/ , w «. *)7G ) \ Ili/ $ ) eo es [ V. _,_�_a \ f W / \j / ° __.am 22 ». 'JdV_._dSd . 0k° G / LA !!;� D ( t / ` ~ . S! • )ZI) / ) G | , 1, r , \ mbi | 1 .C ° J § � Z • ,z2 ~ WI22! ` 21 d t \ ) ` � ��/� ■ j %Ct \} ! ) ' k } k§ 11ciew. ® qkQ ; .L >; a { § / ` § � cp ` a 1l�,�-i , ! o o \ ) . !k o ' t '|0 | " /.c'o s - I ! 7� ! } . , ` _, ■ ; ,3 !tu ■ 9 i it i 0 { { } I : �| $ ! g h�2 ei , 420 !§ j \ 6xr 6 PS Form 3811,Juty1983 DOMESTIC RETURN RECEIPT . . . �. . i 0CT 2 31984 1 117E t?f . . `l -u, ff , Leo. 801'9L u6n (awry,i& S i)'hS ATA 7615 Q,0 , 8a03/ ALIA tier/int-LCSIthik S RI); :fitrtrm eley_ &telt, "gni: DtchtkActUicreauxcL With coup 1i itArthdLi ditiar t tt to avidly ea 5.e 0r'S ? tett WItSi zAti- - t/xi - � of wteort tAin 6o 1r a outfit, , O t-e w cur - dmiLt-tie Uz i j ,ibu 6, 3 c vw", ri txi (?mac, P .114T3(4. -F DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY o-: s de 3 OMAHA DISTRICT CORPS OF ENGINEERS a'1 n 6014 U.S. POST OFFICE AND COURTHOUSE OMAHA, NEBRASKA 68102 to ti Onrv``P AN TO ATTENTION OF October 16 , 1984 O Planning Division D Ef E OCT 2 21984 Mr. Michael S. Mullen Department of Planning Services 915 Tenth Street Weld Co. Planning Commission Greeley, Colorado 80631 Dear Mr. Mullen : This letter is a follow—up to our telephone conversation in September 1984. In that conversation we responded to your request for information concerning the effect on the published Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) flood boundaries on Box Elder Creek downstream from Bootleg Reservoir due to elimination of flood storage in Bootleg Reservoir. The specific site is in Section 7, T. 1 N., R. 64 W. , in Weld County, Colorado. The flood boundaries for this reach of Box Elder Creek are designated on the FIRM as Zone A, indicating that they are based on approximate study methods. We made a very cursory examination of the effect of Bootleg Reservoir on downstream flood boundaries. This examination considered the flood control storage that existed in Bootleg Reservoir and the drainage area upstream from Bootleg Reservoir. We feel that the storage available in Bootleg Reservoir for flood control would be consumed by the ascension side of the 100—year flood hydrograph of Box Elder Creek and would not decrease the peak discharge. This conclusion plus the approximate nature of the existing FIRM flood boundaries downstsream from Bootleg Reservoir make us feel that the flood boundaries on the FIRM would not change. More change would probably result in the FIRM flood boundaries from a detailed hydraulic study rather than from changes in the flood control characteristics of Bootleg Reservoir. We hope that these comments are useful to you. Please keep in mind, however, that they are based on a cursory examination of existing information, not detailed studies. If you have any questions, feel free to call on us. Sin erely, ry S. B ss Chief, Fl od Plain Management Services Branch Planning Division '//tD c. i)Z* . At? Acie 9/7s zc e. 1Qv �7�� Ada E7m, 6%Va, aegtdreAi', Q % S C\Yr 11. gm. lbi iota care M . 261uat H y , C'o. g0G Mu? ,4h44494v, 4: 4uSnzJ4/ &i4J St with k alotikfreeplid -titt, hut tri mc, aecsa!tc/ u 1RJ titk VantrifrAx . vdii nett tit eitafge, ILL Vv tei WIC brteaelkibIllia aupp . btfe1 ��l� kW nuoly Y , lut te iontiofr tett& 0674, Dc& S's m thi i MA. at O2 e� (watt c ct tam" Yip -'. 81 would 6 tc aw h& the' /ALL rr tid_ atd y 4c/to l/ a! Oar t u, oc-A4At -Out cot& th Ot -the frikautg- elfilUingr-iti>O`ntir7drehr k ea' W. ma the )OI,/.z ditiotievq. qui Wo C07rciout 63/4-gpteirtrAU dutst Ll Sttuv.; (-fo442_ eu l'avcfz, fo PliaNN I Nq cam M i33,-0A) c � q//8(s y � sub/wet-it 4 HRS A LER CONSULTANTS, IN- �u C2 'f'4 PQ�AN�N� 1 s5(` INDEPENDENCE STREET LOideN ,/_espit SUITE 3-A �DMMI s 5141 LANEWCX�D. C O1ORADO80215 l: 11001 HARLAN W. ERKER (303) 232-5h59 CONSULTANTS IN ROBERT D. TAFELSKI HYDROGEOLOGY AND STEPHEN R. PALMER July 6. 1984 WATER RESOURCES Jim Erger 84006-01 Leeper & Company 7290 Magnolia Street Commerce City, Colorado 80022 Re: Ground Water Availability Twombly Ranch Property Dear Mr. Erger: As requested, we have made an evaluation of the availability of ground water beneath the Twombly Ranch property. According to the information given to us, the property encompasses all of Section 7, Township 1 North, Range 64 West, for a total of 640 acres (see Figure 1). The Laramie-Fox Hills aquifer is one of four deep, non-tributary aquifers which occur in the Denver Basin. Because the property is located near the northeast edge of the basin, the Laramie-Fox Hills is the only bedrock aquifer which occurs below the property area. This aquifer is generally considered "non-tributary" because the ground water from this aquifer is neither in direct contact, nor contributes to the surface water system of Box Elder Creek and the South Platte River. Data from well logs and completion reports for deep wells in the vicinity of the subject property indicate that the Laramie—Fox Hills aquifer occurs between approximately 680 feet and 780 feet below ground surface, and that the saturated sand thickness of the aquifer is approximately 90 feet. The specific yield used in this evaluation is the latest value utilized by the State Engineer's Office as of June 21, 1984. This value is 15%. The following formula was used to determine the amount of water available from the Laramie-Fox Hills aquifer: Saturated Allowable Property Specific Sand Annual Area x Yield x Thickness Appropriation = (acres) (fraction) (feet) (acre-feet) 100 years This formula is based upon the criteria set forth in Section 37-90-137 (4) Colorado Revised Statutes, 1973, otherwise known as Senate Bill 213 (S.B. 213). Also taken into consideration were non-tributary ground water rights existing on or near the subject property prior to the enactment of S.B. 213 which could reduce the allowable appropriation from the Laramie-Fox Hills for the property. Our research indicated that there were no pre-S.B. 213 ground water rights on or near the property, which could reduce the amount of water available from the Laramie-Fox Hills aquifer. According to the above formula, the total amount of water available to the property from the Laramie-Fox Hills is 8640 acre-feet, which may be appropriated at a rate of 86 acre-feet per year. Mr. Jim Erger July 6, 1984 Page 2 Water quality data reported in the U.S.G.S. Water Supply Paper, No. 1658, indicate that the quality of water from the Laramie-Fox Hills aquifer is of fair to good quality and suitable for public supply and domestic use. A water quality -analysis should be made upon completion of drilling to determine the quality for the planned uses. As per the information provided, it is understood that the property is to be subdivided into 13 lots. Twelve of these lots are to contain 40 acres or more. The remaining lot will consist of 2.6 acres. It appears that the best approach to provide water for the 12 large lots would be to drill a Laramie-Fox Hills well for each lot. For the small 2.6 acre lot, a Laramie-Fox Hills well could be drilled but it would be restricted to in-house domestic use only. The possibility also exists of using an existing well to supply the small lot. This well, which is located in the NW4, NW4 of the section, is apparently a shallow well completed in the Box Elder Creek alluvium. No permit exists, however, late registration should be explored with the possibility of piping the water from the well to the 2.6 acre lot. Whichever of these alternatives is pursued, a water supply can be obtained for this lot. In summary, available information indicates that water of acceptable quality can physically be obtained from the Laramie-Fox Hills from beneath the property. 'The entitlement as per Senate Bill 213 would be approximately 86 acre-feet of water per year. This amount would be ample for the proposed uses. If you have any questions regarding this matter or wish additional information, please do not hesitate to call. Very truly yours, FIRS WATER CONSULTANT , INC. Robert D. Tafelski Vice President RDT/kjp J 36 Jq^ hs LEGEND - z I ii 1 wN SATURATED THICK- - �_� 49J4 1 - r40_ NESS CONTOUR WITH_ .Lr ,\)� i THICKNESS IN FEETaim 1 ' I 0 1000 Irel id G _ - 1 SCALE IN FEET _ a„\ .. .....,, No nej s i 5n f�, �' �— LIMIT OFALLIIVIUM Re<1; 1 C TWOMBLY RANCH � ' �- o PROPERTY BOUNDARY 7 o00 ox,TI i . ._ . ) / , �l/, , It \-___-- -C o V.el 0 12 Weu ' 49r� O ` �- ' %1 r rr ,i �� _` FoFovr ! _ `a A to oNC. il , - �. , 9.9s, �� I�eta,r 5050 Wel / _, a 4984 `� 13 w.- �� 18, ( <-1"---,,, � rzir • l / TWOMB LYRANCH = 99 We° t LOCATION MAP SHOWING \N - iF 99& PROPERTYBOUNDARY AND SATURATED THICKNESS OF ALLUVIUM HRS WATER CONSULTANTS, INC. FEBRUARY, 1984 84006-01 R65 W ! R64W . V - e tar 61' n. x y gy vaw �. f "� .4 A F • x n 0L • $'. rY� si.• 5 � .` t:'?'' 4 yy '� s +4i' ,fixx.. ;,;•;•;•;. ,° :, i FB T„j ¢ b�. It'll: �! o } 4n'st . ,. 1. . '., , “':, ,;•-.,,..k, A. . i, \ - !? i. ... .r '.. ;:t:,; 1; ERv 4 i # ,tn tvGl. 3 t4 I. r 1 4 s M 1r 111333 I. ‘ . i • 4 I , 1, t .. , 04 '' , ;fix N ' a 1 r to II;;;' ` -r 4F" l i @ 1 „4 P. t t Ili y f 7 b T , ig rx- iP M Fjf a i b e�.Ya. Y 1 n m � Ya= • II 4vf'� t! r1 f 6} y ,# 1 A { _ 8 k r 4 j 1 . F' !. 4 "`: A A �i ! r. , h ?� i" s -x 14 i. '44.L r �:r g .� � k 2 .,.it, b � 1 • n f" r € q�", �•} if v s 1 jYy � �.i� t L iii 9'4 S �• d.� . 3., r",, .4 #1'6 k ,,ma��yy\a C }+` ',3 .r r �! �f • It‘ V t I . 6 �' •?, r ^ .�> A 'I, kph �T ' k Y 3 4 ,ct # 'k 4, M { 2 t 34 f y yY t.9 i jA ✓ # It ! iy ri ,t 4 '2 • . y x I W1 I a # , w .. . . ...........N..— r' T iy IY r >S { a . t 't` 1.j a P t . .„.i . i , 1 `.1i. 4,, ,;.4 ,,,,,I, .r.,,,,.. .. ., ,e t',:i I'. t 2' r q, q ] c .f.:, � . t f4I '. 1 l .Il I > �. €� y i V J 3 $ J �4 4 �`e5n'� c }4 y�. , li P a , Ai 4.444.a I wt 4 � f �. � 0 " 4P ' 4 44 n ,' , 4 . ,,3 t t k" I 'a` , '' .Y , Js rrI ;i# �4 ', II Y j4 J I j ir It p * .4 if 404 4, 1 Ii , _ A TWOMBLY RANCH A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT OF SECTION 7, TIN, R64W, WELD COUNTY, COLORADO PROPERTY DIVISIONS IN VICINITY a 2[_'1 25 .j l) ?rg f� 35 ,.� 31 - F,,r. 1 01, • 2 / 6 .5 NTS L] I OMBLY k.1--- f—i4— 7 c NCH \,\ ENGINEERING/SURVE YING QUI ST CONSULTANTS rm BEFORE THE WELD COUNTY, COLORADO PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION OF RECOMMENDATION TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Moved by Doug Graff that the following resolution be iNEWE uCLd-for-.pa Aage by the Weld County Planning Commission. Be it Reso P1 :by-the Weld. Co my Planning Commission that the application for: CASE NUMBER: Z-407:84:8 SEP 2 1 1984 NAME: Twombly Ranch GREELEY, COLO. REQUEST: A Change of Zone from Agricultural to Planned Unit Development (Residential-One (R-l) and Agricultural Uses) . LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Section 7, TIN, R64W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado. LOCATION: Approximately two miles east of Hudson; south of State Highway 52 and east of Weld County Road 49. be recommended unfavorably. to the Board of County Commissioners for the following reasons: THE WELD COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDS THAT THIS REQUEST BE DENIED FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS: I. The applicant has failed to demonstrate in oral statements or in the submitted application materials that: A. The Change of Zone request is consistent with the agricultural policies of the Weld County Comprehensive Plan. The Weld County Comprehensive Plan Agricultural Policies are as follows: 1. Agriculture is considered a valuable resource in Weld County which must be protected from adverse impacts resulting from uncontrolled and undirected business, industrial, and residential growth. In order to maintain and promote this important segment of the county's economy, the cultural and human values associated with farm life and the overall benefits of an agricultural environment, any uses of prime irrigated farmland for uses other than agricultural will be critically reviewed to insure the proposed development will not adversely impact the agricultural interests of the county and that the development will positively contribute to the overall economy, environment, and tax base of the county; and 2. In order to minimize conflicting land uses and minimize the cost of new facilities and services to the taxpayer, industrial, commercial business, and residential development will be encouraged to locate adjacent to the existing twenty—seven (27) incorporated towns and in accordance with the comprehensive plans and stated wishes of each community. Z-407:84:8 Twombly Ranch A Change of Zone from Agricultural to Planned Unit Development (Residential-One (R-1) and Agricultural Uses) . -Section 7, T1N, R64W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado. September 18, 1984 Page 2 - The applicant is proposing a Change of Zone on an entire section of land (640 acres) in order to develop thirteen (13) large lot residential units. The subject site is dryland wheat cropland and subirrigated floodplain pasture. One- third (1/3) to one-half (1/2) of the site could be considered prime farmland if it were irrigated. All of the uses of the soil surrounding this site are agricultural type uses and the surrounding land is irrigated cropland. The future Weld County Land-Use Map shows that this proposal is located in an area intended for agricultural uses. - The Change of Zone request is not compatible with the surrounding zone district and is a request to "spot zone" a section of land within an area exclusively zoned agricultural [please refer to attached exhibit one (1) ] . The minimum legal lot size at this location for one (1) single family dwelling unit is eighty (80) acres if the lot is irrigated and one hundred sixty (160) acres if the lot is dry land. - The Town of Hudson recommended approval of the proposal in a letter dated July 26, 1984. The Hudson Town Board felt that the proposal would have little or no adverse impact on the surrounding area. The County Planning Staff disagrees with the position of the Hudson Town Board. This Change of Zone request on a section of land at this location would establish new and changing conditions for the subject site and for land in the immediate vicinity and could provide evidence for future land-use proposals in the vicinity, contrary to the adopted Future Land-Use Map of Weld County [please refer to attached exhibit two (2) ] . The subject site is approximately two (2) miles east of the Future Town Growth Area of Hudson as projected by the Weld County Future Land-Use Map. B. The Change of Zone request is consistent with the residential policies of the Weld County Comprehensive Plan. The Weld County Comprehensive Plan Residential Growth Policies are as follows: Z-407:84:8 Twombly Ranch A Change of Zone from Agricultural to Planned Unit Development (Residential-One (R-1) and Agricultural Uses) . Section 7, TIN, R64W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado. September 18, 1984 Page 3 1. New residential developments which are not closely connected to and served by municipal utilities and services shall be discouraged; 2. Proposals for new residential development adjoining existing municipalities shall be encouraged, so long as they conform to the desires of the towns as expressed in their comprehensive plans; and 3. Existing municipalities are the best and most efficient sources of public goods and services which are necessary to serve new residential developments. These municipalities will be encouraged to improve their ability to serve new developments and will be looked to for service of all new developments within their corporate areas, in annexable areas immediately adjacent to the town and even those areas not immediately available for annexation, but within a reasonable service distance from the municipality. - The location of this proposal is approximately two (2) miles east of Hudson and not in an area targeted for future urban activities. Given the facts about the distance from the Town of Hudson to the site, Hudson's future growth plans as identified on the future Land-Use Map for Weld County, and the proposed residential development, the proposed Change of Zone conflicts with residential growth policies of the Weld County Comprehensive Plan, as listed on pages 59 and 60 of that adopted plan. Motion seconded by: Paulette Weaver Vote: For Passage Against Passage Louis Rademacher Bill McMurray Sharon Linhart Stephen Hamilton Paulette Weaver Doug Graff Lydia Dunbar Jack Holman -Bob Ehrlich Z-407:84:8 Twombly Ranch A Change of Zone from Agricultural to Planned Unit Development (Residential-One (R-1) and Agricultural Uses) . Section 7, TAN, R64W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado. September 18, 1984 Page 4 The Chairman declared the -Resolution passed and ordered that a certified copy be forwarded with the file of this case to the Board of County Commissioners for further proceedings. CERTIFICATION OF COPY I, Bobbie Good, Recording Secretary of the Weld County Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing Resolution is a true copy of the Resolution of the Planning Commission of Weld County, Colorado, adopted on September 18, 1984 and recorded in Book No. IX of the proceedings of the said Planning Commission. Dated the 19th\\ day of September, 1984. Vo1a.\�....... Qooq Secretary 1 Additional Comments Z-467:84:8 1. The Department of Planning Services has received -one (1) phone call objecting to this -proposal from a surrounding property owner and two (2) letters expressing their objection. Date: September 18, 1984 CASE NUMBER: Z-407:84:8 NAME: Twombly Ranch REQUEST: A Change of Zone from Agricultural to Planned Unit Development (Residential-One (R-1) and Agricultural Uses) . LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Section 7, TIN, R64W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado. LOCATION: Approximately two miles east of Hudson; south of State Highway 52 and east of WCR 49. THE DEPARTMENT _OF -PLANNING SERVICES _STAFF _RECOMMENDS THAT THIS REQUEST EE DENIED -FDA THE FOLLOWING REASONS: I. The applicant has failed to demonstrate in oral statements or An the submitted application materials that: A. The -Change of Zone request is consistent with the agricultural policies of the Weld Bounty Comprehensive Plan. The Weld _County Comprehensive Plan Agricultural Policies are as follows: 1. Agriculture is considered a valuable resource in Weld County which must be protected from adverse impacts resulting from uncontrolled and undirected business, industrial and residential growth. In order to maintain and _promote this important segment of the county's economy, the cultural and human values associated with farm life and the overall benefits of an agricultural environment, any uses of prime irrigated farmland for uses other than agricultural will be critically reviewed to insure the _proposed development will not adversely impact the agricultural interests of the County and that the development will positively contribute to the overall economy, environment and tax base of the county; and 2. In order to minimize conflicting land uses and minimize the cost of new facilities and services to the taxpayer, industrial, commercial business and residential _development will be encouraged to locate adjacent to the existing twenty-seven (27) incorporated towns and in accordance with the comprehensive plans and stated wishes of each community. The applicant is proposing a Change of Zone on an entire section of Land (640 acres) in order to develop thirteen (13) large lot residential units. The subject site is dryland wheat cropland and subirrigated 1=loodplain _pasture. One-third (1/3) to one-half (1/2) of the site could be considered prime farmland if it were irrigated. All of the uses of the soil surrounding this site are agricultural type uses and the surrounding land is irrigated cropland. The future Weld County Land Ilse Map shows that this proposal is located in an area intended for agricultural uses. The Change of Zone request is not compatible with the surrounding zone district and is a request to "spot zone" a -section of land within an area -exclusively zoned agricultural [please refer to attached exhibit one (1) ] . The minimum legal lot size at this location for one (1) single family dwelling unit is eighty (80) acres if the lot is irrigated and one hundred sixty (160) acres if the lot is dry land. The Town of Hudson recommended approval of the proposal in a letter dated July 26, 1984. The Hudson Town Board felt that the proposal would have little or no adverse impact on the surrounding area. 1'he County Planning Staff disagrees with the position of the -Hudson Town Board. This Change of Zone request on a section of land at this location would establish new and changing conditions for the subject site and for land in the immediate vicinity and could provide evidence for future land use proposals in the vicinity, contrary to the adopted Future Land Use Map of Weld County [please refer to attached exhibit two 2) subject site is approximately 2 miles east of the Future Town Growth Area of Hudson as projected by the Weld County Future Land Use Map. B. The Change of Zone request isvconsistent with the residential policies of the Weld County ComprehensTive Plan. The Weld County Comprehensive Tian Residential Growth Policies are as follows; 1. New residential developments which are not closely connected to and served by municipal utilities and services shall be discouraged; 2. Proposals for new residential development adjoining existing municipalities shall be encouraged, so long as they conform to the desires of the towns as expressed in their comprehensive plans; and 1. -Existing municipalities are the best and most efficient sources of _public goods and services which are necessary to serve new residential _developments. These municipalities will be encouraged to improve their ability to serve new developments and will be looked to for service of all new developments within their corporate areas, in annexable areas immediately adjacent to the town and even those areas not immediately available for annexation, but within a reasonable service distance from the municipality. — The location of this proposal is approximately two (2) miles east of Hudson and not in an area targeted for future urban activities. Given the facts about the _distance from the Town of Hudson to the site, Hudson's future growth plans as identified on the future Sand Use Map for Weld County, and the proposed residential development, the proposed Change of Zone conflicts with residential growth policies of the Weld County Comprehensive Plan, as listed on gages 59 and 60 of that adopted plan. Additional Comments Z-407:84:8 1. The Department of Planning Services has received one (1) phone call objecting to this proposal from a surrounding property owner and two (2) letters expressing their objection. LAND USE APPLICATION SUMMARY SHEET September 18, 1984 CASE NUMBER: Z-407:84:8 NAME: Twombly Ranch ADDRESS: c/o James Erger, 7290 Magnolia Street, Commerce City, Colorado 80022 REQUEST: A Change of Zone from Agricultural to Planned Unit Development (Large Lot Residential and Agricultural Uses). LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Section 7, T1N, R64W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado LOCATION: Approximately two miles east of Hudson; south of State Highway 52 and east of Weld County Road 49 SIZE OF PARCEL: 640 acres POSSIBLE ISSUES SUMMARIZED FROM APPLICATION MATERIALS: The criteria for review are listed in Section 28.3 et seq. of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. It is the Planning staff's opinion that the application materials failed to show that the proposal is consistent with the Weld County Comprehensive Plan or that the present agricultural zoning is faulty or that conditions have changed in the area to warrant a change of zone. The residential growth policies are listed on pages 59 and 60 of the Weld County Comprehensive Plan. For additional information about urban develop— ment and residential growth policies, refer to pages 51 through 60 of the Weld County Comprehensive Plan. -Ile Weld County Future Land-Use Map shows that the subject area is located outside of a future town growth area and it is intended to remain agricul- turally zoned. According to the Important Farmlands Map for Weld County, the subject site is not prime farmland. However, as noted by the Southwest Weld Soil Conserva- tion District, about one-third of the area would be prime farmland if it ibecame irrigated. She Department of Planning Services has received one (1) phone call objecting to this request and several inquires about the proposal. MSM:rjg FIELD CHECK FILING NUMBER: Z-407:84:8 DATE OF INSPECTION: August 24, 1984 NAME: Twombly Ranch -REQUEST: Change of Zone from "A" Agricultural to "P.U.D." Planned Unit Development -LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Section 7, TIN, R64W LOCATION: Approximately 2 miles east of Hudson; south of State Highway 52 and east of WCR 49. LAND USE: N State Hwy 52, Box Elder Creek, 4 residences, mobile home, irrigated cropland (pivot) E WCR 51, residence, Denver Hudson Canal, cropland, farm residence and mobile home S WCR 10, residence, pasture, irrigated cropland, farm residence W WCR 49, irrigated cropland, 3 residences, dairy farm, 2 farm residences to the southwest ZONING: N Agricultural E Agricultural S Agricultural W Agricultural COMMENTS: Subject site is an entire section (640 acres) that is proposed for thirteen (13) residential lots. Currently, the site is dryland wheat cropland and floodplain pasture. No improvements are present on the property. Twenty (20) head of cattle were estimated to be grazing, and a cattle loading area was located in the northwestern corner of the property. The western half of the section is flat and within the 100 year floodplain of Box Elder Creek. Evidence of recent flooding was apparent; grass was caught in the fence line crossing Box Elder Creek. The majority of the floodplain is fenced for pasture. The eastern half of the section is upland terrain with a western slope. Four roads provide access to the site: State Highway 52 (paved) , WCR 51 (gravel) , WCR 49 (gravel) and WCR 10 (gravel) . The bridge on WCR 10 has been washed out. Trash and car bodies can be found adjacent to the damaged bridge and Box Elder Creek. Two wet spots were noticed on WCR 51 and they can be attributed to seep areas. By: a '4aQ . GI1`Q� Michael S. Mullen Current Planner 3 ( \ 31 3 NI j/-K, o oi ( ._1 r _ . ,_N___ c , . ",0 c-, , ,,,. f K • , 4 • 4934 A 2/1 `� �� N \yS k) 4939 Ireland /l __ �© 0 A ""4 t-1 ( \ \ \ , �o Rea No 11::711 1- V ` 1 ) 4950 a93B ��C_ 5000 \ _ \ \i ,�. 0 - �-, 5050 �( � 5 pi . 1 52 _ .-11. . o a: ,7. 7(. _.I it( \ Well o w8 .• r �11 5036 _\i5034, 03x�y y -_. • - 4 54- � 2 �'�/ i, SOLI ci: z m V ,r5\0:5/0 Y �( � J We 4s60__ � �'x \��I�1 ��_ _ \, owH 12 4,60 1, 11 09]3\ N o 7 ( - (-- -,i 8/ moo „ � T)( V 71 . ��___""" V�p�g� � � C I i D fret A v Z -407 • 4.962.. (�� CIO. t 9490 I \N 5050 D • `j. 4394 ) ,1 1. --N,-. � J r 14 • ' / = sae 13 - • 18i teat U8 sl �\ Cm� V� - _ i -\ p d _ G \/\ , , I � 1, �I � l sea ll•) n49.9 _ ^Well �� n 500{ _ 4998 1 STO p o � sus �� ti i � ff"tc REZONING APPLICATION Case 7i: eoZ Yo7;8Y: 8 Dept. of Planning Services App. Chid By: 1AS(% Date Recd: 915 10th Street App. Fee: lI"jy-,,x Receipt A: I1(o,2/ Greeley, Colorado 80631 Record. Fee: Receipt 9: Phone: 356-4000, Ext. 4400 TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT. Please print or type, except for necessary signature. Wa I (we), the undersigned, hereby request hearings before the Weld County Planning _ t - - Commission and the Weld County Board of County Commissioners concerning the proposed " rezoning of the following described unincorporated area of Weld County, Colorado: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 1 NORTH, RANGE 64 WEST OF THE 6th P.M., WELD COUNTY, COLORADO °) rolF]T;V,7] ` AUG 0 198G a ca tri -- -,d n _,irN.t is a, <.[, t _. Property Address (if available): WZMUJNEROLiiktgl44 PRESENT ZONE A-AGRICULTURAL PROPOSED ZONE P.U.D. f0'LAL ACREAGE bZ3.95 OVERLAY ZONES PORTIONS IN_FLOOD HAZARD ZONE _ SURFACE FEE (PROPERTY OWNERS) OF AREA PROPOSED FOR REZONING: Name: RONALD A. COOK Home Telephone ii: 536-4242 Address: P 0 BOX 273 Bus. Telephone 9: -,1rat'*±vqu₹I� fa!t.. HUDSON. GO. 80642 Name: IIOYD IAND Home Telephone 6: 659-3153 -i',�. 5w . ,`.<� Address: 14021 COUNTRY HILLS DRIVE Bus. Telephone R:a . :' -"' BRIGHTON. CO 80601 ."t Name: Home Telephone R: Address: Bus. Telephone /: Applicant or Authorized Agent (if different than above): Name: ,JAMES FRGER Home Telephone I: 659-0549 Address: 7290 MAIIOl IA STREET Bus. Telephone al: 288-5061 COMMERCE CITY. CO. 80022 Owner(s) and/or lessees of mineral rights on or under the subject properties of record Ely: in the Weld County Assessor's Office: a'_...m x. . ti= • Name: UNION PACIFIC RAII ROAD Address: µ : x Name: ' Address: +x +.. " +...< Name: _ .. ti a Address: -'- I hereby depose and state under the penalities of perjury that all statements, proposals and/or plans submitted with or contained within this application are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. COUNTY OF WELD ) STATE OF COLORADO ) G4 . o Si ature: Owner Authorized '+1R t ;ylrh` t'4 i _ 't`f Subscribed And sworn to before me this 31 day of JULY , 1984 . '^ ' SEAL p .. - NOTA,.Y PUBLIC a 7-80 My Commission expires: JULY 6, 1986 (�J O p✓✓J1 - _ ( TwStLI PA CF. r...-rrehensivc 'lanllmtact Analysis Fac: .. and : E'W The Twombly Ranch is a planned unit development proposal for section 7 , Township 1 Perth , Range 64 West of the 6th P . M . located in weld Count Colorado . The proposal is to divide this 6fl6 acre property into 1 ? parcels . Covenants will be developed limiting further division of land , and recuirina all of the land what ' s for actual homesite construction be maintained except used in an agricultural grazing or dry land farming use . This will insure both the continued agricultural use of most of the property as well as insure against soil erosion from either wind or storm water . A open space trail easement for use of the residents of the entire PUD will also be created along the Creek as an open space amenity . The site plan map for this PUD is submitted with this report . The property is located 2 miles east of Hudson on State Highway 52 , and is ti -sec`_ed by PDX Elder Creek and traversed by several tributary draws to Pox Elder Creek . This division is actually what has occurred sporaticallv along Fox Elder Creek to the north prior to the adoption of the Comprehensive Plan and present zoning ieouirements. In adjoining Section 6 , for instance, there are R parcels along the Creek ranging from 2 to 72 acres in size; similarly in Section 8 there are 6 parcels from 2 to 43 acres in size . The accompanying map shows all of these previous divisions , including the recent exemption immediately to the east where the County allowed a division of a larger parcel into two parcels of comparable size being proposed by this PUP. • The developer . ievn this proposed PUP as being a rural - agricultural development not urban , since eight of the proposed lane parcel sizes will all be 4r+ acres in size and four will be in excess cf 60 cores in size . However the Weld County Comprehensive Flan recuires any proposal which isn ' t exclusively acriculture to he submitted es a Planned Unit Development which must be accompanied by a feasibility report . The purpose of this report is thus to evaluate this proposal in relation to the Weld County Comprehensive Flan ar part of the PUP submittal . It is � l int c -. E - tc adrr F the mandate required in policy statement f3 rr'. L _ Lr c.r i . .. rccr- etF_..c ] ve Plant a ea`. - .C C-Y ' !. t ' c , thy wli _ is-::c tr ust f their develcLment with detail od plan ( Fianne-f Unit Pevelcr- Ent ) aces ' . .: ,, c , b, an economic ,.,. . cam t2tE7'.E77 E _ <,, e \- ro -•entai impact statement prepared by recoonized experts shoving all details of how thedevelopment proposed would affect the local and county sconoric base , the tax revenues and cost of t . suc • : chop l s utilities ,F :;_ _ _ C services c _ c � �- _ , roads , and health sei ; CC and the immediate �87n ling t erm impact on the existingenvironment . -r. Tn addition , this report will address how this development is responsive to the other policy statements on pages 48 thru SO , 12P-129 , and other statements throughout the Comprehensive Plan. Mc F177-. _ ri7a these at r r OIOW e f 1 c . - - � _ . 2 . fly nor.,-acricultur '• use of prime irrioatec fern land 2 . The expansion of earl-business will be encouraged , and by implication non-agricultural developments will be discouraged if they are located an area which might discourage expansion of aori-business . 3 . Non agricultural development will encouraged next to existing Towns , the Town ' s wishes will be heavily considered , a PUP plan will be required , and PUD will be accompanied by economic and environmental impact statements. 4 . Only those devc '_ cpments which do not contribute to water , air , or surface deyelcc-er.t will be encouraged . c rural development of non-productive lands and water will be encouraged . 6 . Construction in flood plains and other hazard areas will be discouraged. • C Statzrt rl, ff fact `_ le '_' E is very lirited for fa . _ nc ,; rL _ : pICpeity i ` traversed by Pox Elder Creek and Fe e r=-- _ but ' drays ; thus at present over 35`',. acres - v - • r crazing land . The balance is utilized for dry land rarrirc veer This development will not take any prime farmland nut of eroduction and thus doesn 't violate standard 41 . Furthe : rare it will conform with item 45 by allowing the sale of non—productive land= ; the crazing land will probably be utilized by the new owners for the same purpose . Even on the dryland farmed area , the chance „ _ 11 he nir: '_nal as the new owners will undoubtedly continue to lease their properties for such use . If one ficures a maximum of 5000 souare feet on each property being devoted to house area and driveway, the actual land being taken out of production is less than 2 acres which is less than 1% of the property ' s total area , and an infinitesimal number when compared to the over 2 million acres of land beinc farmed in Weld County, It ' s even tossible that is some respects agricultural production in terms of livestock might increase , since the parcels are certainly large enough for some limited livestock /Poultry operations . The property will also not utilize or compete with surface or irrigation water , as the deeper aquifers which are not sufficient for most agricultural uses will serve the homes . Statement 42 - The proposal will not adversely any existing or proposed agri- business . In terms of adjacent property' s , the land to the West is am irrigated farm and is owned by one of the principals in the Pt's proposal ; to the North are smaller parcels with some dry-land farming along the floodplain of Box Elder Creek; to the East are two homesites , one of which has a home under construction , and further east dry-land farming ; and to the South is waste land along Box Elder Creek and dry-land farming . Thus in terms of r immediate uses there ' s no conflict with this proposal , and in terms of a new agri-business venture in the area it ' s doubtful any major facility could be located in the immediate area given the proximity of Hudson , existing residences , and the close proximity to SF52 and I-76 . Other possible conflicts , mentioned in the Comprehensive Plan (pan 42-43) , such as increased storm water and conflicts with irritation ditches are not applicable in this case . All runoff flows to Pox Elder Creek not onto adjacent farms , and the amount rf excess runoff caused by 13 additional homes is infintesimal ( less than 14 impervious service) . There are no major irrigation ditches traversing the property; the small ditch serving property - to the North will not be disturbed by home construction since it ' s adjacent to the Creek well within the floodplain . Statement f ,S « n — T rror,csa? is in fairly c' . . s rrcyinity tot, Town of Fuson , and the resdEntr of this r:'. C ' n_.;.f,nt would ur::. tec heir- the business in the Town with their purchases . The Town is not Opposing this development . In terms of envir , oren.t impact , we have reviewed this proposal with those items ro.ntione on paces 72 to 7R of the Comprehensive Plan . Our conclusion is that this development should have none Or minimal adverse affect , and will probably have a net positive environmental impact by insuring no future intensive development will take place and the Creek area will be substantially preserved in its ' natural state . The floodplain will be left undisturbed , except for some limited grading in the northwest corner of the property in the fringe of the flood storage area for homesite construction . Thus the area along Box Elder Creek will remain in it ' s natural state insuring continued aquifer recharce , ^ goring .-_ rstructores would be destroyed during r .c. aY 17surc th77 . wi'dl _ _e . 7e: _ , ear bed can continue to do so . Finally , there ' s no steep sicpes , unstable ceologv or soils , or unique natural scenery that will be disturbed with the PUP . - Furthermore in ±erms _of -wildlife , none of this area is identified as critical wildlife habitat , nor are any endangered species known to be present in this property' s vicinity. We also feel we are in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan ' s open space goals (page 79 --) as the development will include an open space trail easement along the Creek for horseback riding and hiking enjoyment of the residents of the subdivision . Such a greenbelt trail is mentioned as a positive factor in numerous locations throughout the Comprehensive Plan . In terms of economic impact , we believe this property will have a positive impact . Cur rationale is as follows: . ,I 1. The addition of thirteen families will have a positive effect on the businesses located in Hudson since undoubtedly shopping for gas , etc. will take place in Hudson. This positive `.` economic impact will cause a, minimal increase in service responsibility for the Town , since the only possible service increase might be some additional road maintenance caused by traffic from the subdivision. However , since the major road thru Hudson is SH52 which is maintained by the State Highway Department even this impact will be minimal . (- 7 . T ' , _ .. ere -e ^'.« hss a total mill levy of `5 . 153 - - _•c - • -r- : t - v. rr .. _ CIE C ' i _- , _ C CI f 7CCEt _ 7t . c• : EJ " .. eta Cc.. r; . _ _ _ c _ c . - `.'nc _ stric t , 2 . 376 mills C: Z for` the Fire Pre: s icr, i : s: riot , end 4 . 581 mills or E% cfor Aims ri . noas En exsn7y2c. the 50 , 00C assessed velue of adjacent home`e Farce _ = 1 ., 27 r - ^^ F, ) times the eventual _ homes when _ r the P fully de : Eloped ,peGr this l' I CLErty teuld generate 515 , 00f/year in property taxes . Of this total , °4 ,450 would COME to the County , almost .5F , 000 to the School District , SEGO to the Fire District , and the balance to the Conservancy Districts ( 5750) and the Junior College ( 51200) . 7 . The cost to these entities to provide services varies. a The cost to both of the Conservancy Districts over what services they presently provide is nil Thus the diff erence of present taxes of 51_f; tg the projected 5750 per year is benefit . b . The Junior College also benefits , since they increase their revenue off of this property from the present 525 to $1200 per seer . Although eventually some children from the development will utilize this collece , it ' s likely to be years away and even then most of the College ' s operating funds are paid for with tuitions and appropriations from the legislature. c . The Fire District is a harder entity to evaluate cost- benefit . At present the District receives $12 . 50/year in property taxes , but except for controlling the spread of a field fire there ' s nc services to provide . in the future the District will receive 5600 per year , but will have to provide fire protect'd on to 13 residences . Statistically, all residences need 1 fire call over a 20 year period , thus over a twenty year period it ' s likely this PUD will require 13 calls . The cost of each call from a Volunteer Fire Departments is approximately $600/call . Thus over a 20 year period the District will statistically have to provide S7800 of service, but will receive 512 , 000 worth of income . The District will also benefit in that with the addition of 13 homes , the pool of potential volunteer ' fireman will increase . C. , The School District ' s revenue wil l increase frcm the present E11F• . 5 to almost SF , 000 /veal . In talking with District Officials , they ' re not concerned about new facilities as the ex _ s`, , nc schools hove more than sufficient capacity to handle the children flop 17 additional residences . They ' re also not concerned about the on-going cost of providing services for the children from 73 residences , in that after the first year , funds from property taxes and the State of Colorado are sufficient to cover the annual educational expenses . They ' re major concern is the redden addition of 13 students , since there is up to a 14 n month - lac _ ; rece i. . _r,C revenue frog property taxes and the .Tate _. c^ _ ' d enters the s C h r o l ' s s y s t e enrolled _ _ :. _ . � _ .. 7 �c ;e-bE thi s Lis yFar : `. coy , rt r ' : receive any additional revenue until _ l few families being added per year to the _ : _ t _ ict E : cold Can he handled without increasing ore '_ atiro costs , bt if the children of 13 families suddenly err: led T: c... ca'... -cbler= Thus aandt 1 ccu ' ' u s the pI oblen is with rapid development is Ot G ^c 4.' rating expenses wherenG revenue is Tr.ThCica' C,-,- _ e r c : in : war to this concern of rapid ^ r r r , _ as offered to pay the District a fee cct , a _ ; : s of d . It ' c v - - ct i ici cn -e L;. n er - r , a probable ,at no - r C � several years , as these t\� ,E'S G.� develop-rests arc very slow . However this money should help resolve any possible concerns over children entering the systE without the District receiving some immediate revenue . to 54 iFr rc tare on the present tax rate, met `. oo c ' cc c asse rent , and the projected value of thirteen homes . The major service this sub i7isicn will utilize from the County is and ,r_, the road niece services . Sore services , such as social services will probably not be utilized at all , , since welfare is not usually needec for families that car, afford $150 , 000+ that a lot and homes willcost in this PUP . Undoubtedly residents of the subdivision will also proportionally need other County services pale for by their Property taxes , such as property assessment of the .Assessors Offices or tax collection of the Treasurer ' s Office , but the addition of thirteen homes will certainly not cause any extreme burden . Other services are paid for out of the property p . ,e. ty tax mill levies and user fees; building permits fees for instance . For roads , the property is abutted ontheeast , west , and south by existing County maintained roads ; although the road td the south is not utilized since a County bridge has been washed out . The road to the north is SH52 which is a high speed 2 land paved road and maintained by the State Highway Department. All but two of the parcels will front on the gravel roads to the east and west , with the only physical improvements being culvert installations by the developer for each driveway. The County presently maintains these two gravel roads with road graders , and the State does partially re-reimburse County from the highway users taxes . The additional total 130 vehicle trips per day Thou: d rot cause any increase in the County ' spresent schedule especial c w maintenance especially since most of these vehicles will be cars or light trucks not the heavy weight vehicles which cause most road dar'ace . The payment for the maintenance of these roads will be borne by the County ' s road and bridge property tax fund which will receive an additional S750/year from these 13 homes , plus what the State pays from the gasoline tax funds. Thus overall , since this development is not creating new roads , it shouldn ' t adversely effect County road services . C C cn•c] cs i on: _ _ _ _i ..CE : . :tent] ,: _ .. c.^-r,fCr . with _ c rroyea . Specifics_ y i F r .. ot...- - gees not take C' production t of any prime ;r _ r _ ut = rural water . TYE rrepcoa: .'.oey E] ] Co a reasonable use of non-productive .. _ : e Still; ] r - . _ _ r;c <- rcring with any present or proposed __ _ re... :` - -re yrcccEal iS col - atible tiith existing development in the area as jt si —Cy COStinatiOn of past development trenc` e in the area t .• al : cyrno areas along the Box Elder Creek 1-..ed to he utilize for -7= iler f-arre : tea . 4 . The proposal will be a benefit to the nearest existing corr: :nity of Hudson . 5 . The proposal will not adversely affect the environment . 6 . The proposal vii : not adversely affect existing public services , End in fact in rest cases will be a benefit in terms of fro idi tore taxes than services required. TWOMBLY RAIICH A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT OF SECTION 7, TiN, R64W, WELD COUNTY, COLORADO PROPERTY DIVISIONS IN VICINITY ( _J U - rw;:. 2 G - 25 /i9 MORA .3 5 3/ +,. I� 2 1 iS 6 AMMO5 tfr 01 A. 9L -� T OMBLY NCH a, \ .. .- Aim C Al -s CNONCLNuw/5 W VE VINO . .y4 (fill "LT CONSULTANTS ,)O1) HARLAN W �RKEF- FOBERT D TAFELSK, -- ,TERHENR PA.M.ER Ju1F 6. 1984 WATER S '... El Jim Erger 84006-01 Leeoer & Company 7^_91' ≥\iagnoiia Street Commerce City. Colorado 80022 Re: Ground hater Availability Twombly Rand; Property Dear Mr. Erger: As requested. we nave mace an evaluation of the availability of ground water beneath the Twombly Ranch property. According to the informatic given to us. the property encompasses all of Section 7. 'Township 1 North. Range 64 West, for a total of 640 acres (see Figure 1). The Laramie-Fox Hills aquifer is one of four deep. non-tributary aquifers which occur in the Denver Basin. Because the property is located near the northeast edge of the basin. the Laramie-Fox Hills is the only bedrock aquifer which occurs below the property area. This aquifer is generally considered "non-tributary" because the ground water from this aquifer is neither in direct contact. nor contributes to the surface water system of Box Elder Creek and the South Platte River. Data from well logs and completion reports for deep wells in the vicinity of the subject property indicate that the Laramie-Fox Hills aquifer occurs between approximately 680 feet and 780 feet below ground surface, and that the saturated sand thickness of the aquifer is approximately 90 feet. The specific yield used in this evaluation is the latest value utilized by the State Engineer's Office as of June 21. 1984. This value is 15%. The following formula was used to determine the amount of water available from the Laramie-Fox Hills aquifer: Saturated Allowable Property Specific Sand Annual Area x Yield x Thickness Appropriation = (acres) (fraction) (feet) (acre-feet) 100 years This formula is based upon the criteria set forth in Section 37-90-137 (4) Colorado Revised Statutes. 1973. otherwise known as Senate Bill 213 (S.B. 213). Also taken into consideration were non-tributary ground water rights existing on or near the subject property prior to the enactment of S.B. 213 which could reduce the allowable appropriation from the Laramic-Fox Hills for the property. Our research indicated that there were no pre-S.B. 213 ground water rights on or near the property, which could reduce the amount of water available from the Laramie-Fox Hills aquifer. According to the above formula, the total amount of water available to the property from the Laramie-Fox Hills is 8640 acre-feet, -which may be appropriated at a rate of 86 acre-feet per year. f � tem Later cualit: data reported in toe U.S.C.S. Water Supply: Paper. No. 1h5E. indicate teat the q„ality of ii‘aten Irons toe Laramie-Fox Hills aouifer is of fair tc rood c'iality ant suitable f.oi c.u5lic r;lpply and domestic use. A .rater duality: analysis spook be mace upon , _triple;ion of craln_ to determine, Ire duality Icr tae planned uses. As per the information pcovidec. it is 'unners:God _ea_ __c. _rooert` is to be subdivided into 13 lots. Twelve of tuese lots are to contain 4E acres Or more. The remaining lot will consist of 2.6 acres. It appears tort the best snnroaCr to prc\ loe water for. the :2 lance lots a'arid be co crill _ L m ie _LS _ _ - e small Thmell. tiC7 IJdrted ,.. trit1 NI% Of tue csection. L apparentaq a shalloV. well completed the Box Eider Creek alluvium. No permit x:sts. I1oAYever. late registration snouic Lz explores who toe tlo _i.p_i1tf C' D:Dlnc. tot water iron. Lae well to toe f.f acre lot. Whichever of ta0SE alternatives is ow'suec. a water _upph can be optamec for tt:is lot. tie summa"\ . available information indicates rem: later C: acceptable cua r: car pi c nnii' ., oa -i„ec i`o"; _„ _ _rr o-Fcx 111 _ ;eneatil tie roperty. Foe ort::The tettmemerd . pe Senate Bil. would be a uprcx a.eiy S; ae eel of wadtii pc: Teis , o°unt rule : e ample for to ei poses uses. If you have am questions regarding this matter or wish additional information, please do not hesitate to cal;. 1:erg- truly pours. HRS I1ATER CONSULTANTS. INC. Robert D. Tafelski Vice President RDT'kjp Le ; I L Ft C - I I r I SATURATED THICK_ x-40 -- NESS CONTOUR WITH i THICKNESS IN FEET r= s• St:._E IR -_-- r' c— i @ ' I � ' �-� LIM:T OFALLUVIUM. 1. f I 1 - 1 - --I f - . e� fro., TV. OMBL:' RANCH / 7 / _— diej ROPERTI' BOUNCAP.Y �/• / i 4 F �_ 4 ` M .- i M i 1 ?\)(e1L ur �- p } �� J� //'� �. SOSO24:( - —..-'123 -I-17:\:N...'-'----H,::r..._ ______:- '----------„,-- —1 J I �W. N- „ r L 18 \' TWOMBLY RANCH -__- LOCATION MAP SHOWING L "' PROPERTY BOUNDARY AND SATURATED THICKNESS OF ALLUVIUM ' A\ HRS WATER CONSULTANTS, INC. Pa FEBRUARY, 1984 84006-01 iR 65 W 1 R 64 V1' :_ ..r.-_,c. c-�..�: utuar,�.s, •a,«,. - 1227 - 8th Avenue Greeley, Colorado 80631-4<liT> Telephone (303) 356-3101 Engineering, Surveying, Planning & Land Development August 2, 1984 Department of Planning Services PROJECT NO. 84001 915 - 10th Street Greeley, Colorado 80631 RE: TWOMBLY RANCH P.U.D. SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 1 NORTH, RANGE 64 WEST OF THE 6th P.M. WELD COUNTY, COLORADO Gentlemen: We have reviewed the Soil Conservation Service Soil Survey with regards to this area. Their analysis of the soils materials within the area is "poor to unsuited" for sand and gravel . The area is overlain with about 60 inches of loam, silty loam and sandy loam. The topsoil is rated "good". The "Resource Map" at the County Planning Office indicates that the area West of Box Elder Creek is "Valley Fill " with the gravel resource unevaluated. The area East of Box Elder Creak shows no gravel resource. An area of 35 to 40 Acres along the creek at the North end of the Section has been classified as T4 - a Stream Terrace Deposit with a probable gravel resource. These sources , lack of previous mining, the limited area and location would indi- cate a minimal possibility of an economically mineable gravel resource on the tract. The Soil Conservation Service_Soil Survey indicates "slight to moderate" consider- ations for septic systems and leach fields . Given the variety of soils in the area and the size of the tracts, it would be my judgement that suitable sanitary sewer systems can be designed for each lot. Department of Planning Services August 2, 1984 PROJECT NO. 84001 RE: TWOMBLY RANCH P.U.D. SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 1 NORTH, RANGE 64 WEST OF THE 6th P.M. WELD COUNTY, COLORADO A portion of the P.U.D. lies within the 100-Year Flood Plain according to Flood Insurance Rate Map - Community Panel No. 080266-1025 C, dated September 28, 1982 and prepared by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (See P.U.D. Plan). This area adjoins Box Elder Creek and . is designated as Zone A - Base Flood Elevation not determined. All proposed lots, except Lots 2 and 3, have an adequate building site outside of the designated Flood Plain. A minimum 100' X 100' building pad will be constructed on Lots 2 and 3 to an elevation one foot (1' ) above the anticipated flood level prior to sale. These pads will adjoin County Road 49 and be at the edge of the flood plain, causing negligible interference in the flow. The building permit process will verify compliance with the Flood Plain Overlay regulations on these two lots. There are no other overlay districts affecting the P.U.D. Respectfully, McRae & Short, Inc. � v� '�`'SBEe'c9, e Fo t F <? illet 6616 !Ai %uT° A O g %lg�e&1.0.0 Gerald B. McRae, Professional Engineer and Land Surveyor, Colorado Reg. No. 6616 i„3F is ch-°oillo 2 SOIL SURVEY 0. "GELD COUNTY, COLOI 7O, SOUTHERN PART United States Department oI Agriculture, Soil Conservatt : 'iv , t In )Lp JJJ�cooperation with the Cok rodo Agricultural Experiment Station 44 Q / 49 _ ' 10 4 60 E / \ :max g . h� ada \ 47c , 69 q'M7 \ _ � 49 ' 18 , ' Yew} v2 /` '� J. 44 70 _t/, + '-'s J•. ' 4.3% X 30340„.4". 6k679 72 %, 70 fig 70 ,71'„i ., 1 i - - 16 44 d , 'q ark M 4 1 " "01',: ,. ." 4, r 6 • . 4 yam„ gyp. rf 18 5l A 72 i i3 4: S �' / ! \ 18 J rj 0 r. 46 S p l.: .1, 32 78 ;14{1,1 it., 79 ( ;1n 44 ', 7; 18 (18 '3 , 0 �' 4 -AiI t j ' 3 78 X.51 J. Kk q 79 ' Ibr till fa.,1S4 '7 1 `t , i1 ta..4">4 a « •1 it e • pit '� ,�/ .�, • SIR I 79 • 4 .. i 'd,x c V, • _.79 i 4 a q .#.1 i1 11 4 -(v w� ' Att. 18 'I 1 1 slop jay, x,, 5' �"fAyr 1 �`7�,p,f ;✓ x r . i 1 1 , X18 r Py� :ra.� 51 rot '•.t1'ti7' 40 19 of f; y r, t .i .,,- 0. ,,.4 �t v,r f vY.^ t 4 ��//'gM I.. % 44 ,60 Y ... .,, , , .t . s :: 4- ^711 a TW0116LY RANCH 4 1 �'ki • 2J .,' . tt . 1 Section 7, Township 1 North , Pan •-4•464- '' = 64 West of the 6th P.M„ Weld 4 / T T •r o, t Ir.�'�fi. �;. , v ",'-',.:'l'='•1r . 394 1 it. F'j• i ' i phlt2gl ' County, Colorado, ti ' ♦1 a.. 4> 18 ' !'i 57- b^L5 '' sr\ t s o.Hl1 ' 34001 3. Weld-Colby C . Deep, nearly level to moderately sloping, well drainers (canes Jo nued in calcareous eolian deposits This nearly level to moderately sloping map unit is on * Soils with major occurance, plains mainly in the southeastern part of the survey area. detailed information included. One small area is in the west-central part. The unit makes up about 10 percent of the total acreage. About 50 per- cent is Weld soils, 35 percent is Colby soils, and 15 per- cent is soils of minor extent. • Soils with minor occurrance, Weld soils occupy the broad nearly level areas. Colby detailed information not soils occupy the steeper side slopes. Weld soils have a included, loam surface layer and a clay and clay loam subsoil. Colby soils have a loam surface layer and silt loam underlying material. Minor in this unit are the well drained Adena and Kim soils. This map unit is used mainly for cropland. About 65 percent is nonirrigated. Winter wheat is the principal crop. If irrigated, the soils are well suited to all commonly grown crops. The potential is fair for development of openland wildlife habitat. U.S DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE 1OII Hall) SYMBOL NAME 1,0MBOL NAME 1 - Alman loam 0 to I percent slopes 44 Olney loamy sang. I t, t pen ails copes 2 All oan loam I to 3 percent slopes Olney loamy sanm 3 In`.li''''nt slopes 3 Aounns and Aouenls gravelly substratum 16 Olney fine sand, Ham Ii to I pan mil Inpes • 4 Aryiol s and Aouepts.Hooded je 4/ Olney line sandy tarn I I I 'onr'on(=lopes As(awn sandy loam 1 to 3 percent slopes 48 Olney line sandy warn 3 to 5 perce,.l slopes o Ascalon sandy loam,3 to 5 percent slopes 19 Osgood send (I to i perrent saves 1 Ascalon sandy loam.5 to 9 percent slopes 50 Olem sandy loam 0:o I Len.ant slopes N Arcaron loam.0 to I percent slopes Otero sandy loam I Ic I pen rut slip's 9 Ascalon leans, I l0 3 percent slopes 52 Otero sandy warn 3 to berdeirl seta's 53 Otero sandy'cam 5 to pare ant slopes • 10 Barnard sandy loam.0 l0 3 percent slopes 11 Presser sandy loam.0 to I percent slopes 54 Paoli loam,Ole 1 [Munn(r.lirpes 12 B'esser sandy loam I to 3 percent slopes ';5 Paoli loam, l Is,3 nrrt ens slopes 13 Cascalo gravelly sandy loam,5 to 20 percent slopes 56 Renohnl cloy loam U lu 3 pert tilt sewer. 14 Colby Iron, 010 I percent slopes 51 Renohill clay loan, 3 to 9 pop oro ropes 44 IS Colby loam, I to 3 percent slopes lb Colby loam 3 to 5 percent slopes 58 Shingle loam, I to 3 pert ens slopes I l Colby loam 5 to 9 percent slopes 59 Shingle loam.3 to 0 pen alit slopes IB Colby edema beams 3 to 9 percent slopes ')Q 00 Shingle Renohill comps.) 3 l0 9 tmren5 slopes 19 Colombo clay loam 0 to I percent slopes 20 Coionroo Clay loam. I to 3 percent slopes BI Tassel tine sandy loam b In 21s pen ant slopes ' 62 Terry line sandy loam 0 tr.3 pair ens slopes 21 Dar ono clay loam.0 to I percent slopes 63 terry tine sandy darn I I. 9 pen rants slopes [2 I)acnno L lay loam. I to 3 percent slopes . ry4 Thedalund loam 1 to 3 pan lid L„pes 55 Tnedalund loans 3 to 9 pro ens swipes 13 fon Collins loam 0 to I percent slopes 24 f or:Collins loam. 110 3 percent slopes 66 Ulm pay loam.0 l0 3 per/ens slopes 61 Ulm clay loam.3 to 5 pear ens 5'npes • 25 Haverson loam.0 to I percent slopes 68 Ustic Tornorthents modurasely veep • 26 Ilaverson loam, I to 3 percent slopes 21 Heidi silty clay. I to 3 percent slopes • 69 Valent sand.0 to 3 pen aril slopes 28 HeIdI Silly clay.3 to 5 percent slopes 10 Valent sand.3 to 9 pen em r'a.pes /1 Valent Loup complex Ii h a p'ae'an sbopes 19 Juleseprg sandy loam 0 to I percent slopes 72 Vona loamy sand.0 to a lien eat storms 30 Jvlesburg sandy loam. 110 3 percent slopes /3 Vona loamy sand 3 L,5 pro ant slimes 31 Hrn m D to I /4 Vona loamy sand S ri 9 cert.ens slides percent slopes 15 Vona sandy loam o tar 1 :Jeri en!3,2p„, 38 him loam 110 3 percent slopes 16 Vona sandy warn 1 W I per)rot slope., 33 e in'loam 3 to 5 percent slopes I/ Vona sandy leant 31u)r I.rn rill t hats 34 had loam 5 to 9 percent slopes le Weld loam.0 to I tail tail draws 35 Loop Boer loamy sands.0 to 3 percent slopes •• 19 Weld Warn I Ip d Isar ens slopes 80 Weld loan, alb 5 per rat woos • 3. Al dray Shingle complex.5 to 20 percent slopes 81 Wiley Colby comps'. „ I ban ern shines 82 Wiley Colby con role. , to I I.tr•lent,lopes P Ne' vn one sandy loam,0 to 3 percent slopes 83 Wiley Colby Corrine. I In 5 pave rid slopes 18 Ne's.or line sandy loam.3 to 9 percent slopes - 64 Norio loam 0 to I percent slopes •4t- Nun.,loam I to 3 percent slopes Now)clay loam 0 to I percent;lopes <) Norio i'ay'oam, I to 3 percent slopes 4I Nunri 1010,,sandy.0 to I percent slopes • 15—Colby loam, 1 to 3 1 not slopes. This is a deep, This soi good potential for urban and recreational well drained soil on uplands at vations of 4,850 to 5,050 development\ ad design can be modified to compensate feet. It formed in calcareous eolian deposits. for the limited capacity of this soil to support a load. Typically the surface layer is pale brown loam about 12 Capability subclass Ile irrigated, IVe nonirrigated; inches thick. The underlying material is very pale brown Loamy Plains range site. silt loam to a depth of 60 inches. 18—Colby-Adena foams, 3 to 9 percent slopes. These Permeability is moderate. Available water capacity is gently sloping to moderately sloping soils are on plains, high. The effective rooting depth is 60 inches or more. hills, and ridges at elevations of 4,750 to 4,900 feet. The Surface runoff is medium, and the erosion hazard is Colby soil, which makes up about 55 percent of the map moderate. unit, occupies the steeper, convex parts of the landscape. In irrigated areas this soil is suited to all crops cony The Adena soil, about 30 percent of the unit, occupies the monly grown in the area, including corn, sugar beets, less steep, slightly concave parts. About 15 percent is beans, alfalfa, small grain, potatoes, and onions. An exam- Kim loam and Weld loam. ple of a suitable cropping system is 3 to 4 years of alfalfa The Colby soil is deep and well drained. It formed in followed by corn, corn for silage, sugar beets, small grain, calcareous eolian deposits. Typically the surface layer is or beans. Land leveling, ditch lining, and installing pale brown loam about 7 inches thick. The underlying pipelines may be needed for proper water application. material to a depth of 61) inches is very pale brown silt All methods of irrigation are suitable, but furrow ir- loam. rigation is the most common. Barnyard manure and com- Permeability is moderate. Available water capacity is mercial fertilizer are needed for top yields. high. The effective rooting depth is 60 inches or more. In nonirrigated areas this soil is suited to winter wheat, Surface runoff is rapid, and the erosion hazard is high. barley, and sorghum. Most of the acreage is planted to The Adena soil also is deep and well drained and winter wheat The predicted average v�nl ice "8 !,usher= formed in calcareous eolian deposits. Typically the surface to allow moisture accumulation. Generally precipitation is urown an" very psi, ur,,w too low for beneficial use of fertilizer. thick. The substratumto a depth of 60 inches is very pale Stubble mulch farming, striperopping, and minimum til- brown silt loam. lage are needed to control soil blowing and water erosion. Permeability is slow. Available water capacity is high. Terracing may also be needed to control water erosion. The effective rooting depth is GO inches or more. Surface runoff is medium, and the erosion hazard is moderate. The potential native vegetation is dominated by blue grama. Several mid grasses, such as western wheatgrass This unit is used for nonirrigated cropland and range- and needleandthread, are also present. Potential produc- land. It is suited to winter wheat, barley, and sorghum. tion ranges from 1,600 pounds per acre in favorable years Most of the acreage is planted to winter wheat and is to 1,000 pounds in unfavorable years. As range condition summer fallowed in alternate years to allow moisture ac- deteriorates, the mid grasses decrease; blue grama, buf- cumulation. Generally precipitation is too low for benefi- falograss, snakeweed, yucca, and fringed sage increase; cial use of fertilizer. and forage production drops. Undesirable weeds and an- Stubble mulch fanning, striperopping, and minimum til- nuals invade the site as range condition becomes poorer. lage are needed to control soil blowing and water erosion. Management of vegetation on this soil should be based Terracing also may be needed to control water erosion. on taking half and leaving half of the total annual produc- The potential native vegetation on this unit is Lion. Seeding is desirable if the range is in poor condition. dominated by blue grama. Sideoats grama, little bluestem, Sideoats grama, little bluestem, western wheatgrass, blue and western wheatgrass are also prominent. Potential grama, pubescent wheatgrass, and crested wheatgrass are production ranges from 1,800 pounds per acre in favora- suitable for seeding. The grass selected should meet the ble years to 1,100 pounds in unfavorable years. As range seasonal requirements of livestock. It can be seeded into condition deteriorates, the sideoats grama and little a clean, firm sorghum stubble or it can be drilled into a 'bluestem decrease, forage production drops, and blue firm prepared seedbed. Seeding early in spring has grama, buffalograss, and several perennial fortis and proven most successful. shrubs increase. Undesirable weeds and annuals invade Windbreaks and environmental plantings of trees and the site as range condition becomes poorer. shrubs commonly grown in the area are generally well Management should be based on taking half and leaving suited to this soil. Cultivation to control competing half of the total annual production. Seeding is desirable if vegetation should be continued for as many years as the range is in poor condition. Sideoats grama, little possible following planting. Trees that are best suited and bluestem, western wheatgrass, bluegrama, pubescent have good survival are Rocky Mountain juniper, eastern wheatgrass, and crested wheatgrass are suitable fur seed- redcedar, ponderosa pine, Siberian elm, Russian-olive, and ing. The grass selected should meet the seasonal require- hackberry. The shrubs best suited are skunkbush sumac, ments of livestock. It can he seeded into a clean, firm lilac, Siberian peashruh, and American plum. sorghum stubble, or it can he drilled into a firm prepared Openland wildlife, such as pheasant, mourning dove, seedbed. Plowing and drilling should he on the contour to and cottontail, and rangeland wildlife, such as antelope, minimize runoff and soil losses. Seeding early in spring cottontail, and coyote, are best suited to this soil. Under has proven most successsful. Capability subclass I Ve irrigation, good wildlife habitat can be established, nonirrigated; Colby soil in Loamy Slopes range site, benefiting many kinds of openland wildlife. Forage Adena soil in Loamy Plains ange site. production is typically low on rangeland, and grazing management is needed if livestock and wildlife share the range. Livestock watering facilities also are utilized by various wildlife species. 47—Olney fine sandy loan( .a 3 percent slopes. Wildlife is ( _ mportant secondary use of this soil. The This is a deep, well drained soh .,o plains at elevations of cropland areas provide favorable habitat for ring-necked 4,600 to 5,2011 feet. It formed in mixed outwash deposits. pheasant and mourning dove. Many nongame species can Included in mapping are small areas of soils that have a be attracted by establishing areas for nesting and escape dark surface layer. Some small leveled areas are also in- cover. For pheasants, undisturbed nesting cover is essen- eluded. tial and should be included in plans for habitat develop- Typically the surface layer of this Olney soil is grayish ment, especially in areas of intensive agriculture. Range- brown fine sandy loam about 10 inches thick. The subsoil land wildlife, for example, the pronghorn antelope, can be is yellowish brown and very pale brown sandy clay loam attracted by developing livestock watering facilities, about 14 inches thick. The substratum to a depth of GO managing livestock grazing, and reseeding where needed. inches is very pale brown, calcareous fine sandy loam. Rapid expansion of Greeley and the surrounding area Permeability and available water capacity arc has resulted in urbanization of much of the Olney soil. moderate. The effective rooting depth is 60 inches ur This soil has good potential for urban and recreational more. Surface runoff is medium, and the erosion hazard is development. The only limiting feature is the moderately low. rapid permeability in the substratum, which causes a In irrigated areas this soil is suited to all crops corn- hazard of ground water contamination from sewage monly grown in the area, including corn, sugar beets, lagoons. Lawns, shrubs, and trees grow well. Capability beans, alfalfa, small grain, potatoes, and onions. An exam- subclass Ile irrigated, 1 Ve nonirrigated; Sandy Plains ple of a suitable cropping system is 3 to 4 years of alfalfa range site. followed by corn, corn for silage, sugar beets, small grain,or beans. Land leveling, ditch lining, and installing pipelines may be needed for proper water application. All methods of irrigation are suitable, but furrow irrigation is the most common. Barnyard manure and commercial fer- tilizer are needed for top yields. In nonirrigated areas this soil is suited to winter wheat, barley, and sorghum. Most of the acreage is planted to winter wheat. The predicted average yield is 28 bushels per acre. The soil is summer £allowed in alternate years to allow moisture accumulation. Generally precipitation is too low for beneficial use of fertilizer. Stubble mulch farming, striperopping, and minimum til- lage are needed to control soil blowing and water erosion. Terracing also may be needed to control water erosion. The potential native vegetation on this range site is dominated by sand bluestem, sand reedgrass, and blue grama. Needleandthread, switchgrass, sideoats grama, and western wheatgrass are also prominent. Potential production ranges from 2,200 pounds per acre in favora- ble years to 1,8011 pounds in unfavorable years. As range condition deteriorates, the sand bluestem, sand reedgrass, and switchgrass decrease and blue grama, sand dropseed, and sand sage increase. Annual weeds and grasses invade the site as range condition becomes poorer. Management of vegetation on this soil should be based on taking half and leaving half of the total annual produc- tion. Seeding is desirable if the range is in poor condition. Sand bluestem, sand reedgrass, switchgrass, sideoats grama, blue grama, and pubescent wheatgrass are suita- ble for seeding. The grass selected should meet the seasonal requirements of livestock. It can he seeded into a clean, firm sorghum stubble, or it can be drilled into a firm prepared seedbed. Seeding early in spring has proven most successful. Windbreaks and environmental plantings are generally suited to this soil. Soil blowing, the principal hazard in establishing trees and shrubs, can be controlled by cul- tivating only in the tree row and by leaving a strip of vegetation between the rows. Supplemental irrigation may be needed at the time of planting and during dry periods. Trees that are best suited and have good survival are Rocky Mountain juniper, eastern redcedar, ponderosa pine, Siberian elm, Russian-olive, and hackberry. The shrubs best suited are skunkbush sumac, lilac, and Siberi- an peashrub. 60—Shingle-Renohill complex, 3 to 9 percent slopes. stubble, or it can be drilled into a firm prepared seedbed. This gently sloping to moderately sloping map unit is on Seeding early in spring has proven most successful. plains, hills, and ridges at elevations of 4,600 to 4,750 feet. The potential native vegetation on the Renohill soil is • The Shingle soil makes up about 65 percent of the unit, dominated by western wheatgrass and blue grama. Buf- and the Renohill soil about 25 percent. About 10 percent falograss is also presented. Potential production ranges is Tassel fine sandy loam. The Shingle soil occupies the from 1,000 pounds per acre in favorable years to 600 steeper, convex parts of the landscape, and the Renohill pounds in unfavorable years. As range condition deteri- soil occupies the less steep, slightly concave positions. orates, a blue grama-buffalograss sod forms. Undesirable The Shingle soil is shallow and well drained. It formed weeds and annuals invade the site as range condition in residuum from calcareous shale. Typically the surface becomes poorer. layer is grayish brown loam about 6 inches thick. The un- Management of vegetation on the Renohill soil should derlying material is light yellowish brown clay loam. Cal- be based on taking half and leaving half of the total an- careous clayey shale is at a depth of about 18 inches. nual production. Range pitting can reduce runoff. Seeding Permeability is moderate. Available water capacity is is desirable if the range is in poor condition. Western low. The effective rooting depth is 10 to 20 inches. Sur- wheatgrass, blue grama, sideoats grama, buffalograss, pu- face runoff is medium to rapid, and the erosion hazard is bescent wheatgrass, and crested wheatgrass are suitable moderate. for seeding. The grass selected should meet the seasonal The Renohill soil is moderately deep and well drained. requirements of livestock. It can be seeded into a clean, It formed in residuum from shale. Typically the surface firm sorghum stubble, or it can be drilled into a firm layer is grayish brown clay loam about 9 inches thick. The prepared seedbed. Seeding early in spring has proven Rr,wr. 'tot „-e 14 incites thick. 'File suostratum is clay loam. ,inaie its at a Rangeiauu ,c�6 depth of about 32 inches. coyote, are best suited to this unit.- Because forage Permeability is slow. Available water capacity is production is typically low, grazing management is needed moderate. The effective rooting depth is 20 to 40 inches. if livestock and wildlife share the range. Livestock water- Surface runoff is rapid, and the erosion hazard is ing facilities also are utilized by various wildlife species. moderate. Capability subclass Vie irrigated, Vie nonirrigated; Shin- This unit is used for rangeland and wildlife habitat. The gle soil in Shirty Plains range site, Renohill soil in Clayey potential native vegetation on the Shingle soil is Plains range site. dominated by alkali sacaton, western wheatgrass, and blue grama. Buffalograss, sideoats grama, needle- andthread, little bluestem, sedge, winterfat, and fourwing saltbrush are also present. Potential production ranges from 800 pounds per acre in favorable years to 500 pounds in unfavorable years. As range condition deteri- orates, the mid grasses decrease and forage production drops. Undesirable weeds and annuals invade the site as range condition becomes poorer. Management of vegetation on the Shingle soil should be based on taking half and leaving half of the total annual production. Seeding is desirable if the range is in poor condition. Western wheatgrass, blue grama, alkali sacaton, sideoats grama, little bluestem, pubescent wheatgrass, . and crested wheatgrass are suitable for seeding..The grass selected should meet the seasonal requirements of livestock. It can be seeded into a clean, firm sorghum 78—Weld loam, 0 to 1 pert slopes. This is a deep, All rnetho(-. if irrigation are suitable, but furrow ir- well drained soil on smooth plains at elevations of 4,550 to rigation is tlu most common. Barnyard manure and com- 5,000 feet. It formed in eolian deposits. Included in mercial fertilizer are needed for top yields. mapping are small areas of soils that have a subsoil of This soil is well suited to winter wheat, barley, and loam and light clay loam. Also included are some leveled sorghum if it is summer followed in alternate years. areas. Winter wheat is the principal crop. The predicted average Typically the surface layer of this Weld soil is brown yield is 33 bushels per acre. If the crop is winterkilled, loam about 10 inches thick. The subsoil is brown and pale spring wheat can be seeded. Generally precipitation is too brown heavy clay loam and light clay about 20 inches low for bent fiend use of fertilizer. thick. The substratum to a depth of 60 inches is silt loam. Stubble mulch farming, striperopping, and minimum tit- Permeability is slow. Available water capacity is high, lage are needed to control soil blowing and water erosion. The effective rooting depth is 60 inches or more. Surface Terracing also may be needed to control water erosion. runoff is slow, and the erosion hazard is low. The potential nativ,t vegetation is dominated by blue This soil is used almost entirely for irrigated crops. It grama. Several mid grasses, such as western wheatgrass is suited to all crops commonly grown in the area includ- .aid need leandt h read, are also present. Potential prnduc- ing corn, sugar beets, beans, alfalfa, small grain, potatoes, tion ranges from 1,600 pounds per acre in favorable years and onions. An example of a suitable cropping system is 3 to 1,000 pounds in unfavorable years. As range condition to 4 years of alfalfa followed by corn, corn for silage, deteriorates, the mid grasses decrease; blue grama, bur- -sugar beets, small grain, or beans. Few conservation prat- falograss, snakeweed, yucca, and fringed sage increase; tices are needed to maintain top yields. and forage production drops. IJndesirahle weeds and an- All methods of irrigation are suitable, but furrow ir- nuals invade the site as range condition becomes pourer. rigation is the most common. Barnyard manure and cool- Management of vegetation on this soil should be based mercial fertilizer are needed for top yields. on taking half and leaving half of the total annual produc- tion. Seeding is desirable if the range is in poor condition. Windbreaks and environmental plantings generally are well suited to this soil. Summer fallow a year before. Sideoats grama, little bluestem, western wheatgrass, blue aregrams, pubescent wheatgrass, and crested wheatgrass are planting and continued cultivation for weed control are needed to insure establishment and survival of plantings. suitable for seeding. The grass selected should meet the seasonal requirements of livestock. It can be seeded into Trees that are hest suited and have good survival are a clean, firm sorghum stubble, or it can be drilled into u Rocky Mountain juniper, eastern redcedar, ponderosa pine, Siberian elm, Russian-olive, and hackberry. The firm prepared seedbed. Seeding early in spring has shrubs best suited are skunkbush sumac, lilac, Siberian proven most successful. Windbreaks and environmental plantings are generally peashrub, and American plum. well suited to this soil. Summer fallow a year before Openland wildlife, such as pheasant, mourning dove, and cottontail, are best suited to this soil. Wildlife habitat planting and continued cultivation for weed control are needed to insure establishment and survival of plantings. development, including tree and shrub plantings and grass plantings to serve as nesting areas, should be suc- frees that are best suited and have good survival are cessful without irrigation in most years. Under irrigation, Rocky Mountain juniper, eastern redcedar, ponderosa good wildlife habitat can be established, benefiting many pine, Siberian elm, Russian-olive, and hackberry. The kinds of openland wildlife. shrubs best suited are skunk bush sumac, lilac, Siberian This soil has good potential for urban and recreational peashrub, and American plum. development. The chief limiting soil features for urban Openland wildlife, such as pheasant, mourning dove, development are the shrink-swell potential of the subsoil and cottontail, are best suited to this soil. Wildlife habitat as it wets and dries and the limited capacity of the soil to development, including tree and shrub plantings and support a load. Lawns, shrubs, and trees grow well. Capa- grass plantings to serve as nesting areas, should be suc- bility class I irrigated. cessful without irrigation during most years. Under ir- 79—Weld loam, I to 3 percent slopes. This is a deep, rigation, good wildlife habitat can be established, benefit• well drained soil on smooth plains at elevations of 4,550 to ing many kinds of mainland wildlife. 5,(X)0 feet. It formed in eolian deposits. Included in This soil has good potential for urban and recreational mapping are small areas of soils that have a subsoil of development. The chief limiting soil features for urban loam and light clay loam. Also included are some leveled development are the shrink-swell potential of the subsoil areas. as it wets and dries and the limited capacity of the soil to Typically the surface layer of this Weld soil is brown support a load. Lawns, shrubs, and trees grow well. Capa• loam about 5 inches thick. The subsoil is brown and pale hility subclass Ile irrigated, Mc nonirrigated; Loamy brown heavy clay loam and light clay about 20 inches Plains range site. thick. The substratum to a depth of 60 inches is silt loam. Permeability is slow. Available water capacity is high. The effective rooting depth is 60 inches or more. Surface runoff is slow, and the erosion hazard is low. In irrigated areas this soil is suited to all crops com- monly grown in the area, including corn, sugar beets (fig. 8), beans, alfalfa, small grain, and onions. An example of a suitable cropping system is 3 to 4 years of ilfalfa fol- lowed by corn, corn for silage, sugar beets, small grain, or beans. Land leveling, ditch lining, and installing pipelines are needed for proper water applications. PROTECTIVE COVENANTS FUR TWOMBLY RANCH SUBDIVISION COL =Y OF WELD, STATE OF COLORADO KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that Jaires Erger, Lloyd Land and Ronald Cook are the owners of all the following described property situated in the County of Weld, State of Colorado, to-wit: TWCMBLY RANCH SUBDIVISION. WHEREAS. James Erger, Lloyd Land and Ronald Cook desire to place certain restrictions on rlets c .n on the riot_ of said subdivision for the use and Done_ _ o: rc en 0 maintain as a carefully protected country residential subdivision and to preserve country auiusphere. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the preni.ses, the said parties for them- selves, their heirs, successors, grantees, and assigns do hereby acknowledge and declare and agree, with, to, and for the benefit of all parties who may hereafter purchase and from tine to tine hold and own any of said plots, that they own the sane subject to the following restrictions, convenants and conditions, all of which shall be deemed to run with the land and to inure to the benefit of and be binding upon the owners at any tine of any of the said plots, their heirs, and personal representatives, successors, grantees and assigns, to-wit: 1. ARCHITECTURAL CONTROL COMMIE 'EE: A committee consisting of James Erger, Lloyd Land and Ronald Cook are hereby constituted to exercise certain functions as hereinafter provided. A majority of the committee may designate a representative Dr representatives to act for it. Any vacancies in said committee created by resignation, death or any other cause shall be filled by the remaining members of the committee. The members of the committee shall receive no compensation for services rendered hereunder. At any time, after January the first, Ninteen Hundered and Ninety Three the record owners of a majority of the plots shall have the power through a duly recorded written instuiarlit, to change the uiibership of the committee. 2. APPROVAL OF PLANS: No buildings, fence, wall or structure shall be erected placed or altered on any plot in this subdivision until the building plans, speci- fications, and plot plans showing the location of such building, fence or wall structure have been submitted in writing and approved by the Architectural Control Committee in writing as to general plan and external design and as to location. Should the cusmittee fail TO ._:prove or Hisumnrove such plan, desi Qn and location within 30 days after the sane have been submitted to it, than such approval will not be recuired and the requirements of this covenant will be deemed to have been net if a written application for approval was in fact submitted to the Architectural Control Committee. All structures shall be completed within twelve no,iths from the date construction is started. 3. D&JJ'TITIONS: A "residence" as the word is used herein is intended to include any attached garage, but said attached garage shall not be deemed included in the square footage required for the dwelling. An "outbuilding" as the word is used herein is intended to mean a covered structure, wholly or partially enclosed and detached from the principal building or dwelling. 4. USE OF LAND: No unre than one single family dwelling of not more than two (2) storms in height shall be erected on any plot and all outbuildings shall be not rare than two (2) stories in height. No buildings of any kind whatsoever shall be erected or maintained except private dwelling houses and such outbuildings as are customarily appurtenant to such dwellings. No used buildings or used houses may be moved unto or placed upon property in the subdivision. 5. MATERIAL REQUIREMENTS OF BUILDING: No residence or attached garage shall be built on said property wherein less than 157. of the outside surface of the walls are brick, stone, or other approved masonry accepted by the Architectural Control Committee. No unfinished concrete or unfinished cinder block buildings shall be erected or permitted on any lot or tract. No building shall be roofed with roll roofing. Metal buildings may be allowed, however they shall be factory engineered steel truss type, with factory baked paint or enamel, set on county approved concrete footing and foundation. All outbuildings shall correspond in style and architecture to the country residential atmosphere. A log house, modular or other all wood exterior designs may be allowed subject to the approval of the Architectural Control Committee. 6. SET BACK OF BUILDINGS FROM STREET LINES: No outbuilding or no residence or any part thereof, except the steps, piazza, or bay window, shall be erected on any plot and within 30 feet of the side yard lot line of each plot. For the purpose of this covenant, eaves, steps piazza and bay windows shall not be considered as a part of the building, provided however, that this provision shall not be construed to permit any portion of the building on a plot to encroach upon another plot. 7. DWELLING SIZE: No tri-level stucture shall have less than 1800 square feet of floor space on the first story and upper level combined. No bi-level shall have less than 900 square feet on the ground floor and not less than 100 square feet on the upper level. No two story shall have less than 1000 square feet on the ground floor and not less than 700 square feet on the upper level. No hall be ereJted or cc an: zch This other - CI= 509 s'"- e --- - flo aces c =ne : -floor level. in addition, all _--dims -st =fort. to the c_r-_ re footage reo'ucrer ts. The scuare footage red"iranants referred tio in this paragraph shall no: include the garage. patio, or any other type of access^ use st aco re. whether connected in whole or in part with the residential „_.=t. Ail residences shall be recuired to have a two car attained or detached garage. S. NUISANCE:^: No noxious or offensive activity shall be carried on upon an plot, nor shall an_`ring be done thereon which_ Say be or becore an annoyance or nuisance to the neighborhood. O mrmnDRARY CTRUnTUFFS: No bascieit .'_+✓c•ll=_n= cubile hu“e. nor e.v ocher ` - __ -77717T . 717:- _ 'Sci nc - c e , __n: either ten orari c' or of a pe___onen: .dome WiEfl the specific pencssian.. of the Architecture_ Control Corrittee, and in accordance with the require: -rs and regulations of Weld Cocunt- . but in no case, for longer than 12 llviiths. 10. SIGNS: No sign of any kind shall be dispiayeo to the public view on may plot except one professional sigh of not more than two scuare feet. flat mounted. .rianri:ated and nonflashing or one sic of no: more than six so'lare feet advertising the Property for sale or rent. or Satins used end erected by builder to advertise the property during the period when construction and sales of new dwellings occur within this subdivision. 11. MAINTENANCE OF F?. ."TSES: No plot shall be used for storage of house trailers or outdoor storage of cars, heavy equipment, goods, wares, merchandise, material, rock, gravel, sand, earth, ashes, junk, trash, or scrap materials, except for the storage of l tuber or other building material during the construction of a dwelling. Each plot shall be kept in a sanitary and sightly condition at all times. Weeds shall be kept unwed. A landowner may be granted a temporary exception to the requirements of this paragraph upon written application and approval by the Architectural Control Com ittee r�on deterrination that such te-rnora_ry exception shall not be detrirental to the health, safety, and welfare of the h abitants of this subdivision. 12 LTVthIUCK AND ?'dl"1ALS : No more than 20 large animals such as horses, cattle or sheep shall be per-Flitted on any plot. No goats or hogs shall be allowed on any plot. No more than two dogs and three cats shall be allowed on any plot. No more than 50 chickens and 50 rabbits shall he allowed on any plot. Hobbies which in no way create unhealthy or unpleasant conditions for the neighbors or which in no way damage the neighbors or the appearance of the neighborhood. In the event of a question (- as to whether any bobby is in violation of the covenants, application may be :-ade by any party affected by such hobby to the Architectural Control Committee for final determination. In no event shall poultry be kept on any plot until an approved structure is erected for the housing of said poultry and. until an area of sufficient size is enclosed with a fence as approved by the Architectural Control Committee for the containment of the said poultry. All animals Trust always be kept under control on the pre._.ises where authorized. 13. HEALTH: All property in the subdivision shall be maintained and kept in a manner so as not to cause, allow or continue conditions on property in the sub- division which spread disease, bad odors, dust or effect the health, safety, or welfare of other residents of the subdivision. 14. N ETERSHIP IN TWCvThLY RANCH HOME WNERS ASSOCIATION: Each owner of aiy plot located within this subdivision shall be a ne ber of TwDauly Ranch Homeowners Association, a non profit association organized for the system care, maintenance and repair of Homeowner Trail as shown on the plats of Twombly Ranch Subdivision, including fences, gates and any other structures. Furtheruure, each owner herein shall as a member of said non-profit association comply with all By-caws, regulations and decisions of the said non-profit association. Meiners of the association may vote to access themselves from tine to time as the need arises to make any necessary repairs. All nenbers of the said association shall have the right to use the Homeowner Trail. 15. 1'f.RM: These covenants shall run with the land and shall bind all parties and all persons claiming under them until January 1, 1993, at which time they shall automatically be extended for successive five year periods; unless, by a vote of the owners of 75 percent of the land area of the total subdivision said covenants are changed in whole or in part and such change duly recorded. 16. ENFORCFI1E T: Any recorded property owner of this subdivision may initiate a proceeding at law or in equity against any party or persons violating or attempting to violate any covenant, to restrain violations or to recover damages. Such violater or violators will be subject to a decree of specific perforuance and payment of attorney fees and costs of any legal action necessary to enforce these covenants. 17. SEVERABILTY: Invalidation of any one of these covenants by judgement of court shall in no ways affect any of the other provisions which shall remain in full force and effect. - RATED: This day of , 1984 State of Colorado ) County of Adams ) as The within and foregoing instruueslt was acknowledged before ne this day of 1984 by James L. Erger, Lloyd Land and Ronald Cook. Notary Public DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES fa,, ,,,. ..:,.. , PHONE (303) 3564000 Est-4400 1 915 10TH STREET k, • GREELEY,COLORADO 80631 £ ilk COLORADO NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING The Weld County Planning Commission will conduct a public hearing on Tuesday, September 18. 1984. at 1:30 p.m. to review a request -7-rev,- . e -,r 1,_" altar _. .. (Planned Unit Development) for Twombley Ranch c/o James irh,r on a :parcel of land described as Sertion 7. TIN. R64W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County. Colorado containing 640 acres, more or less. This public hearing to be held by the Weld County Planning Commission for the consideration of the above referenced request will be conducted in the Weld County Commissioners' Hearing Room, First Floor, Weld County Centennial Center, 915 10th Street, Greeley, Colorado. Comments or objections related to the above request should be submitted in writing to the Weld County Department of Planning Services, 915 10th Street, Room 342, Greeley, Colorado 80631, before the above date or presented at the public hearing on September 18, 1984, Copies of the applicatibn are available for public inspection in the Department of Planning Services, Room 342, Weld County Centennial Center, 915 10th Street, Greeley, Colorado (356-4000, Extension 4400) . Bob Ehrlich, Chairman Weld County Planning Commission To be published in the: La Salle Leader To be published one (1) time by: September 6, 1984 /i Received by: � /l , Date: 7/ �z7 PC/ C Mailing List Twombly 'Ranch c/o James Elger COZ-407 Surrounding Property Owners Robert & Bill Warner Frank H. Ricketson, III 1157 Northern Avenue 1515 Vine Street Brighton, CO 80601 Denver, CO 80206 David & Margaret Trostel 901 WCR 11 Erie, CO 80516 -Ervin & Jane Frafjord 24020 WCR 10 Hudson, tO 80642 Robert & Mary Swank 3581 WCR 531 Keenesburg, CO 80643 Russel & Joan Hayes 24545 Highway 52 Star Route, Box 98 Hudson, CO 80642 -Charles & Barbara Patterson 5198 WCR 49 Hudson, CO 80642 Donald & Lorraine Jones P.O. Box 413 Brighton, CO 80601 Frederic & Darla Syman 18669 WCR 22 5't. Lupton, CO 80621 Stanley & Irene Rollers 3013 WCR 47 Hudson, CO 80642 Raymond & Bruce Kauffman 7532 WCR 65 Keenesburg, CO 80643 George , -Emma & Willie Taoka 3127 WCR -49 Hudson, CO 80642 Lloyd Land 14021 Country Hills Dr. Brighton, CO 80601 -Edward & Marie Bernhardt 23571 WCR 10 Hudson, CO 80642 MINERAL OWNERS Z-407:84:8 lwombly Ranch, c/o James Erger Union Pacific Land Resources Corporation P.O. Box 2500 -Broomfield, Colorado 80020 REFERRAL LIST APPLICANT: Twombly Ranch c/o James Erger CASE NUMBER: Z-407:84:8 SENT REFERRALS OUT: August 9, 1984 REFERRALS TO BE RECEIVED BY September 6, 1984 z z m o co o z H H o < 41 0 E~ w E z < z ca o o z C W H FL 0 V 4 0 w H w a Fq H W '-, w M o o c o 0 o a o p-. 42 0 I:4 z w e z z z M PhON t, eta County Attorney (plat only) 1/("051 Lawrence A. Gerkin Henrylyn Irrigation District I Weld County Health Department *S«SKe{a.�P140 P.O. Box 85 Ic er Hudson, Colorado 80642 V Engineering Department 536-4702 County Extension Agent Bill McMurray 1 ill Weld County Planning Commission P.O. Box 161 V/ Office of Emergency Management Brighton, Colorado 80601 I Brighton Soil Conservation Dave Karpel Service Rocky Mountain Energy 60 South 27th Avenue Brighton, Colorado 80601 Brighton, Cali Union Pacific Corporation 111 659-7004 9'Io/g1 10 Longs Peak Drive Box 2000 Broomfield, Colorado 80020 469-8844 / State Engineer Bob C. Gudka, Superintendent V/ XX Division of Water Resources u.; iScr-1a 1: Weld County School District 1313 Sherman St. , Room 818 < a .\..f. y: ni' ,, Re-3(J) Denver, Colorado 80203 c IZ{h P.O. Box 269 Keenesburg, Colorado 80643 J State Highway Department - 732-7844 X% 11420 2nd Street Greeley, Colorado 80631 Tom Cech Central Colorado Water Colorado Department of Health I Conservancy District Water Quality Control Division 2308 29th Street, Suite 2 4210 East 11th Avenue Greeley, Colorado 80631 Denver, Colorado 80220 Don Bogart, Wildlife Biologist Co M.-rof.; XX - Dudley McGill Colorado Division of Wildlife -t tor `.7,c•,4- Hudson Planning Commission b/ Northeast Region a4. I--- P.O. Box 351 317 West Prospect Hudson, Colorado 80642 Fort Collins, Colorado 80536 536-9998 484-2836 XX Judith A. McGill / Chief Ralph J. Miller Hudson Fire Protection District %/ Regulatory Branch I P.O. Box ? Omaha District Corps of Engnrs Hudson, Colorado 80642 Omaha, Nebraska 68101 The Henrylyn Irrigation District TELEPHONE 536-4702 P. O. Box 85 HUDSON. COLORADO 80642 April 2.6, 1984 ,.; I , I !' Michael S. Mullen Dept. of Planning Services So. 0315 w La;missr:: 915 10th Street Greeley, Colorado 80631 Pe: Case Number S-231-84-3 Applicant, Lloyd Land; Ronald Cook L2.- _-• ...__lc,, The Henrylyn Irrigation District opposes the development of :roperties located in the V; of Section 7, Township 1 North, Range 54 `Jest of the 6th P.M. which lay within the 100 year Flood Plain. The described property also lays below Horsecreek Reservoir, which has a "High Hazard" rating by the State Engineer' s Office and Bootleg Reservoir which is located in Adams County five (5) miles south on Box Elder Creek which has been breached. Bootleg Reservoir has been used for Flood Control on Box Elder Creek until April 20, 1984 at which time the Dam was breached. By breaching the Dam, the potential of floods has increased by a great extent. The drainage of Box Elder Creek originates at the Palmer Lake Divide south of Elizabeth, Colorado. The development of the Wj of said section should have careful consideration due to the possibility of loss of life within the potential Flood Plain. • The development of the E}j of said section is possible without the real danger of Flood Hazard. Sincerely, 174 LLB Cam* / / Lawrence E. Gerkin Sec-Mgr. Henrylyn Irrigation District P. -0. Box 85 Hudson, Colorado 30642 CC: Jim Erger LEG/mgr STATE OF COLORADO Richard D. Lamm, Governor 0VOR9Do DEPARTMENT OF NATURALRESOURCES DIVISION OF WILDLIFE o 4,, 3 ay James R. Ruch, Director 6O6OBroadwaY - - - --- OF'41‘.~ Denver,Colorado 80216(297-1192) ; f( `!Larry Ro€stad, District Wildlife - it i Manager I , 1528 28th Ave, Ct. Weld County Planning Commission Greeley, Colorado 80631 915 10th street Nell1 Ca. Planning gnmml ss imi Greeley, Colorado 80631 Se^tember 9, iSBla To Whom It May Concern: Your agency requested comments from the Division of Wildlife concerning a proposed -change of zoning for the Twombly Ranch, Sec. 7, T. 111, R 6L4W. The proposed change would be from A-Agricultural to P.U.D. After speaking with Tom Lynch, the district wildlife manager in the Hudson area, the Division of wildlife must voice strong reservations about the zoning change and planned development on the Twombly ranch. As you know, Box Elder Creek bisects the ranch. Small irrigation reservoirs lie im- mediately south of the property, and Horsecreek Reservoir is only three miles south. Ruby Lake is 1/2 mile north of the property. According to Lynch/Box Elder Creek in this area,is a major travel corridor for wildlife in this area. Waterfowl uses this flyway to travel back and forth between these lakes. Box Elder Creek, on the Twombly Ranch, is used in the spring and fall as resting, and staging areas for migrating waterfowl. In spring, the area is used as a nesting site for pheasant, several srecies of ducks, as well as wide variety of non game birds, and mammals. The untilled portions of the ranch could be considered very important nesting areas for the pheasant pophlation in the Box Elder basin. Undisturbed areas like this act as reservoirs for pheasants. Broods hatched in these areas spread out to populate the entire region. it should also be mentioned that both Mule and White-tailed deer migrate through and feed on the Twombly Ranch. From the human standpoint, we are concerned about development in the Box Elder flood plain. Lots one through six lie almost entirely in the 100 year flood plain. We are concerned with any development in this portion of the ranch. Mr. Lynch mentioned that he remembers Box Elder Creek having major flooding four times in the last four- teen years. If the Horsecreek Reservoir damn should ever collapse, the people and property in this planned development would certainly be in serious jeopardy. Serious consideration should be given to this issue before any of the western half of the Twombly ranch is approved for development. If the zoning change is approved, the Division of Wildlife would recommend several _stipulations to development. First, we would recommend that all Cattail areas on this property be preserved as nesting areas. This could be done in the framework of green- telts. DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES, David H. Getches, Executive Director.WILDLIFE COMMISSION, James C. Kennedy, Chairman Timothy W. Schultz, Vice Chairman•Michael K. Higbee, Secretary•Richard L. Divelbiss, Member•Donald A. Fernandez, Member Wilbur L. Redden, Member•James T. Smith, Member.Jean K.Tool, Member In the event of development, we would also recommend that areas around the perimeter of the property be set aside, and planted in grasses and shrub clumps. These areas would continue to act as reservoirs for pheasant and other wildlife. The shrubs would make shelter for wildlife from winter storms. These areas, if left undisturbed, could also provide good nesting cover for pheasant. The Box Elder basin could con- tinue to be a fine area for pheasant hunting, and the development could be one example where both humans and wildlife benefit from progress. Once again, the Division appreciates the opportunity to air our concerns about this development. A ana agency that serves both wildlife and the public, and as a prop- erty owner in the area we feel this is an important issue for us. Sincerely, �-:ryas= Larry A0 staU, Jijtricu olialse i�iafager c.c. Carl Leonard, Area Wildlife Manager Tom Lynch, District Wildlife Manager file STATE OF COLORADO DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS 4„ni of,, P.O. Box 850 31 ..az�1 Greeley, Colorado 80632-0850 o S . 303 353-1232 ykt9f cc" September 5, 1984 Weld Co.-S.H. 52 Twombly Ranch P.U.D. 2 Mi. E. of Hudson on S. Side of 52 Mr. Michael S. Mullen Department of Planning Services DOH File 45100 Weld County 915 Tenth Street Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Mr. Mullen: We have reviewed the Twombly Ranch P.U.D. and have the following comments: 1. Projected traffic on State Highway 52 indicates the need for a 150-foot total right-of-way (75 feet each side of the highway centerline) . Additional width to meet this need should be provided along the entire property's frontage on S.H. 52 by setback, reservation, or preferably dedication, as permitted by local regulations. 2. As indicated by the copy of the Access Permit included with this P.U.D. application, an access has been approved by this office which will serve two single-family residences. This will be the only direct access on the south side of the highway between County Roads 49 and 51. Thank you for the opportunity to review this P.U.D. Very truly yours, ALBERT CHOTVACS DISTRICT ENGINEER L William F. Reisbeck To District Pre-Construction Engineer WFR:mbs , cc: A. Chotvacs File: Crier-Jacobson iii1-:__=. . I.11 �., II, 1 1jg34 I 1 L .7 _ Weld Co. Planning IfnmmlSSlm, cit;ttri MEMORAIDUM Illik Michael S. Mullen, Current Planner, Ta Weld County Planning Department Date August 29, 1984 COLORADO From Lea Ekman, Director, Office of Emergency Management r /f7- Subject: USR Case Z-407:84:8 Upon review of the application for Twombly Ranch, the following concerns are reflected: The proposed area as stated is within the Box Elder flood plain. Also within the area are two reservoirs, Ireland Reservoir numbers one and four. It is recommended that the dam owner(s) be contacted by the developer with regard to this PUD to formulate a dam safety plan. On February 18, 1984 reservoir tailed. The area if inundation was su ,c. ,y agricultural . ce,/dver, ;.,;c UCdte require Dam _ _ .. dams and reservoirs to address inspection, warning and activation of evacuation activities in the event of dam failure. Additionally, although not addressed, the question arises as to gas/oil well production plans or current presence. It was not noticed in the application. Please indicate if there are present any mining, gas or oil production units in operation or planned in the area. If affirmative, this office requests location, operation, nature of activity, quantity and emergency contact phone numbers per SB 172, Article 22, Title 29, CRS 1973. Thank you for allowing this office to provide input to this review. cc: Robert H. Rhinesmith, Director, Information Services Agency i Jli � � �J ? �1� Weld Co. Planning Commission ��i �• Planning Department To Pirhaal Mullen Date August 16. 1924 COLORADO From Pndney H Hutchinson P. E. . Engineering Manager subject: Twnmhly Ranch Change of Zone We have reviewed the above mentioned change of zone request and offer the following comments : 1. The number of access points to each lot should be limited to one. 2. The imposing character of the 100 year flood plain indicates that further analysis is warranted. The study should address the determination of the floodway and the subsequent building restrictions which would be appropriate. Building envelopes , grading criteria, erosion protection and potential flood proofing measures should all be established. N--___ �' RHH/bf a \ ......, Southeast Weld Soil Conservation District 60 South 27th Avenue - Brighton, CO 80601 - Phone 659-7004 August 21 , 1984 4 � TUG 21 1904 i ji, Mr. Michael S. Mullen, Current Planner - �J Department of Planning Services Weld Co. Planning Commission 915 10th Street Greeley, CO 80631 RE: Case Number Z-407: 84:8 Twombly -/- -manes Er =r Dear Mr. Mullen : We have the following comments on this proposed zone change. According to the Important Farmlands Map for Weld County, this land is not prime farmland. However, about one-third of the area would be prime farm- land if it became irrigated. According to the comprehensive plan for this proposed zone change, it states that by keeping most of the land for agricultural grazing and dryland farm- ing that will insure it against soil erosion from either wind or storm wa- ter. By keeping it in agricultural uses does not insure against erosion. According to the protective covenants, up to 20 horses or cows would be allowed on each plot. This many animals would soon have the vegetation re- moved from any plot leaving it exposed to both wind erosion and storm runoff. Both grazing and dryland farming takes management to prevent erosion. The open space trail could become severely eroded unless it is designed cor- rectly and proper maintenance is performed. The covenants state that needed maintenance will be done. See also our letter dated May 15, 1984 on the Twombly Ranch - PUD. Sincerely,>,) ;V G ib i , 7 Ron Schlagel , President Board of Supervisors CONSERVATION - DEVELOPMENT - SELF-GOVERNMENT ( .a ( Ngallr Southeast Weld Soil Conservation District 60 South 27th Avenue - Brighton, CO 80601 - Phone 659-7004 May 15, 1984 r- 7 r7r Y Ncf �\\, f 'AI 1 1984 j Weld County Planning Department 915 Tenth Street 19®Id Co. ?lama cnmmISSI0 ll Greeley, CO 80631 RE: Twombly Ranch - PUD We have reviewed the above referenced PUD and have the following comments: 1) Some of the soils have only fair potential for development. These soils have high shrink swell properties as well as low load bearing capabili- ties 2) Caution should be used in developing these soils to prevent erosion. The erosion potential is moderate to high. 3) Covenants should be established for erosion control after development. All areas should be seeded to some type of permanent vegetation. Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this project. If you should have any questions please call . Sincerely, Y, . O/ (ay( Ron Schlegel , President Southeast Weld Soil Conservation District CONSERVATION - DEVELOPMENT . SELFGOVERNMENT NC 36--_ 1 /� ` �\ \ J (31'I 36 a 1 o , . , cii: (Li t �j� ( c ` aeae Ireland / ) �� V U �N G Rea No Fh'v elekitte4 -„ ) l/Q ,f 50 0 001 o 2 241s) �l Ck \ D � / /, ; i�IG 30 I I;l ) ‘6 //6000 , 1 5Q50 \ < / !IVIES V� c _ Well �_.� 0 .'k8\ -•••••••/---.4 -••l.r . • .� "FS5036 • 50J. p �. � 1 soar ' 4 � / Y r We 4g5p— - w L \� \1\ _---V\_ / , r) re Set 'iw.,.• i rl lvv , i ,�. 4 to Stcf my o kg ed M 7a �k 11 Welh4973\ 12,Well / l D Ireland Rea\ - \ \ OFllv4't' / \,�� x '407 1 o • • 4978 496/ t ,_ 3 Diu ao. , O �/ ��y Dion: _ __ °9Po� VL ��/J I . J ,L, Soso J p Well - •- /^ 4994 �> \�� -� /F�•• re Q\ • 1kC"Aim )t&+, , n�r, 1 gh.tre 5( evtiev% (% r ' ;NC Y . I 14 eeo 13 W. ‘ 18/? ✓ I- b ,, �� )-- yo �, sos y.� \ c)Learnti -Ily'rlia I Ll 00 ' ris99 ,,Well ��. 5004 _ ( L-1 o \1 S O • V\( .\,:cs7( �`�'' \N :--- , /4 ' 1I +. s I'� , , ,f - _ &I ♦ 1 _ T • - I- -. C' ^' :.^ i -r ,r ;' ` i t i�: ) �. � I ` - , f - • , - - • WELD COUNTS FUTURE " _ '_ AP t S cT ' ' LAND USE M (�, aC' s GILCAEST �,( - a f .S .-aV . I t , + " e 1.l � 4./1- .ems"' , C, .�, r � Lei ,i� � �P 1 �, o A " k ry sl ` 1 ----1, 3 .'Y'A kI 44 � • :TT cn J r I I�I F - -- � _.4 -- I f 4 '.ct-+s- 2\ . x _• , F'if:� . % FUTURE TOWN ,� ' > C , GROWTH Bou�IOAR'j ' � } t i PRoPosED SITE ` r 1 �� P r _., i� ry.._ -r- -_ __ -I- 1� x\ • C 1 I c ,nay l �i7! IV' _ -_ r ,l't ; t I I , v LEGAL DESCRIPTION ��I ids � �� ' CASE NO. - 407 -p6• IOF 2 T �p`f ,3 26 13 15 18 (1'8 r...3n ,:. PR. E 4y 18 t '�15 0626 �` .,. Y . ERVOIR < I LAND' ... " traar s $ 48 SOIL CLASSIFICATION SOIL NO. IRRICAILl) NON-IRRIGATED PRIME 4 - vIw 10 TT w Vt v./ -- Is nre < 1 V e Yes 18 — IV a Es — `(as 262 ICe IV e YFc-) 36 Ail Q, Le 40 lie - Yes 47 to .Er---e `(E.� 53 .1:C - 60 VI a Vie — - LEGAL DESCRIPTION -- / ) -1-1k1- ) X64-V\i' CASE NO, Z - 4O7 ire. 2 c* 2 SOIL CLASSIFICATION SOIL NO, IRRIGATED NON-IRRIGATED PRIME G9 1XL e Ire -- 72 e . I V € 75 t tcs 79 tEe it e_ t Town of Hudson PHONE: (303)536-4735 609 CEDAR ST. �r7,1C,-1 - ril�;'7 ..'--1 P.O. BOX 351 � r 2�1(-I l u,- 4,._ s! HUDSON, COLORADO 80642 CA c1 Weld Co. Planning Cummissien Department of Planning Services 915 10th Street Greeley, Colorado 80631 RE: Twombly Banch Planno.7 '?nit Pevelonment sketch ^lan nn a. oth r. i. held Co. , Colorado Gentlemen: At our Board Meeting of July 26, 1984, the Hudson Town Board was approached by Mr. Erger and associates regarding the above mentioned development. Earlier this year our Planning Board received a sketch plan from your office regarding the Twombley Development. At this time we had several questions regarding the possible impact of the develop- ment on the community of Hudson. The meeting with Mr. Erger and associates was in an attempt to lay to rest any fears the Town might have regarding an adverse impact on the community by the proposed development. Mr. Erger explained to the Town: 1. The land proposed to be used for the development is of only marginal agricultural use (a premise with which we agree) . 2. Under the proposed population density for the development the impact on the water supply would be less than that laid down by county guidelines. 3. Homes to be built in the development would not be built in the floodplain itself and the geography of the floodplain would not be altered. 4. Under the covenants planned for the development, further subdivision of the property will not be permitted, so that a heavier future population density should not occur. It is the feeling of the Hudson Town Board that if the development is built within the guidelines and covenants presented to us at the Department of Planning Services August July 26 meeting, the Twombley Development will have little or no adverse impact on the surrounding area and might even be an asset to the community. We, therefore, do not oppose the Twombley Development provided it is built according to those plans and covenants presented to us. Sincerely,, ,ayor and Council Town of Hudson JLS/ser cc: Jim Erger cc: Bob Fleming i Case Number S-231:84:3 / AA I s " l D( .RTMEN1 OF PLANNING SERVICES Y� p� PHONE 13031 356.4000 Ext-4400 CC ��y�- _ 91510TH STREET T"WE"' n 'u"7'��%11C7 GREELEY,COLORADO 80631 MAY 9a4 April lz, 1984 o • Weld Co. Manning Cammission COLORADO REFERRAL TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: -4.474r34.i.s k Enclosed is an application from Twombly Ranch c/o James Erger „4, ; ,,, • for a Planned Unit Development for 13 residential sites The parcel of land is described as Section 7, TIN, R64W of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado The location of the parcel of land for which this application has been submitted is approximately two miles east of Hudson; south of Colorado State Highway 52 and east of Weld County Road 49 -,r This application is submitted to your office for review and recommendations. Any 4d. '^a, t"-° .aw, comments or recommendations you consider relevant to this request would be ap- preciated. Your prompt reply will help to facilitate the processing of the pro- - -° posal and will ensure prompt consideration of your recommendations. If a response •' from your office is not received within 14 days of mailing from our office, it may be interpreted to mean approval by your office. If you are unable to respond within 21 days (but wish to do so at a later date) please notify our office to that effect. Check the appropriate boxes below and return to our address listed above. Please reply by Nay 7. 1984. so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. 1. We have reviewed this request and find that the request (does/ -•"� does not) comply with our Comprehensive Plan for the following reasons: 2. We do not have a Comprehensive Plan but we feel this request (is! eti$ is not) compatible with the interests of our town for the following reasons: ' v" ' frit 3. A formal recommendation is under consideration and will be submitted to you prior to q. Please refer to the enclosed letter. r.:'''' /- " • ---- -. /�i /. / l' ✓ �.' - .. II S//i ?1 Signed ' ,---'-/.- N� Agency Date Thank you very much for your help and co-operation in this matter. - 4VictsP& AS. :4V2..cA . 1 Michael S. Mullen, Current Planner w•MSM:rjg `mG 1. -eV +S'c£ iOriwt:4: C (1 ,��, tw �& 4 c' 'i' N 41 /aL A-a-L.1/44 - _/'/ it - !.,R ,i�e--^ f�hrtc.L i.,.- (1r,. C--,_ 4J e / a c �� ;2< tico.tL it.c---, 0 ., o_ /„j✓. ,,I 7 e'�.-L, ,-L-,c C ti -.),2,-2-- - `. c-, - �,,,,, y ,`'_, _l ./ea --. -- s xc, 7:. ,.z � .,: -r� // -.-. /1. G/u�- L� -- - / BOARD OF EDUCATION WAYNE DUNKER,V.Pres. ALAN BURRY,Pres. JANET CARLSON,Sec'y IVAN OSIER,Treas. IVAN LINNEBUR,Ant.Sec'y Weld County School District Re-3 (J) BOB C.GUDKA, Supt. DALE L. RECKARD,Asst.Supt. KEENESBURG, COLORADO 80643 September 13, 1984 Michael S. Mullen, Planner Department of Planning Services 915 10th Street Greeley, Co. 80631 'Phis letter is in reference to the application for a change in zoning for the Twombly Ranch east of Hudson,Colorado. The district and developers of the property have reached a verbal agreement concerning the amount that will be paid the district per lot sold, for new students that the district might be serving because of the development. A formal contract is being drawn up and unless one of the groups changes their mind, the district has no objections to the planned development. Sincerely, Bob C. Gudka .� Superintendent S1-:P 14 1984 BG/de Cnaui W Weld Co. M o d of G°ropy RICHARD D. LAMM � "p'. Governor h O, JERIS A. DANIELSON p State Engineer �r /876X OFFICE OF THE STATE ENGINEER DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES 1313 Sherman Street-Room 818 Denver, Colorado 80203 (303) 866-3581 September 12, 1984 Mr. Michael S. Mullen Weld County Planning Department 915 10th Street Greeley, O? 80631 Re: Twombly Rancn, *Z-407:04:0 Sec. 7, TIN, R64W Dear Mr. Mullen: We have reviewed the above referenced proposal to create three parcels from 606 acres. We previously reviewed this proposal on May 7, 1984. Our earlier comments still apply. The only additional comment we have is that a household use only well in the Laramie-Fox Hills aquifer would be available on the 2.6-acre tract. How- ever, we feel this would be an expensive alternative. The existing well can be used for the 2.6-acre tract if it was constructed prior to 1972. Sincerely, Hal D. Simpson, P.E. Assistant State Engineer HDS/JRH:ma/3398 cc: Jim Clark, Div. Eng. ScP 17 1984 Weld Co. Planning Commission OF COC RICHARD 0. LAMM /fT d JERIS A. DANIELSON Governor `" �o 1. ' State Engineer 2565H * 1876 * OFFICE OF THE STATE ENGINEER DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES 1313 Sherman Street-Room 818 Denver, Colorado 80203 9 (303) 866-3581 ry May 7, 1984 'aY 1 �Eld Co. Nlenning Cammissinr, Mr. Michael S. Mullen Weld County Planning Department 915 10th Street Greeley, CO 80631 Re: Twombly Ranch Section 7, TIN, R64W W. Div. 1 - W. Dist. 1 Dear Mr. Mullen: We have received the above referenced proposal to separate approximately 617 acres into 13 lots. Only one of the lots would be less than 35 acres. Our comments follow: 1. We presume the proposed 2.6-acre parcel already has a well. If this is not the case, we must ask that this proposal be referred back to us with information on how water would be supplied to the small lot. 2. Our review of lots over 35 acres is not required by statute and, therefore, we do not commit to permits on these larger lots. Also, we do not cite specifics of permits which might be sought. The application proposes Laramie-Fox Hills wells. Our information indi- cates it is about 1000 feet to the base of the Laramie-Fox Hills formation. We believe adequate water for domestic wells would be available from the Laramie-Fox Hills aquifer. 3. The development lies on Box Elder Creek below Ireland No. 1 Reservoir and Ireland No. 4 Reservoir as shown on the topographic map. Infor- mation in our files indicates Ireland No. 1 Dam is eight feet high and has a capacity of 116 acre-feet. We believe Ireland No. 4 is somewhat smaller. 4. From the limited information in our files, it appears the floodway, should a dam break occur to the Ireland No. 1 and No. 4 Reservoirs, may be within the 100-year floodplain as identified on the plat. We recommend the county seek information delineating the dam break floodway, especially from Ireland No. 1, in order to make a determi- nation whether all lots would have an adequate building site above the dam break floodway. Where only a portion of a lot is above the floodway, the building site should be designated. Mr. Michael S. Mullen Page 2 May 7, 1984 5. We would also like to advise you that Bootleg Reservoir has been breached and no longer mitigates flood flows down Box Elder Creek. We recommend that a new 100-year floodplain be defined for planning purposes within this subdivision. 6. This office cannot recommend residential construction within the dam break floodway. Please let me know if you have any questions. Sincerely, sl P. Simpson, P.E. ce L HDS/KCK:ma cc: Jim Clark, Div. Eng. Alan Pearson, Chief, Dam Safety Branch Steve Spann, Chief, Design Review Unit September 13 , 1984 Weld County Department of Planning Services 915 10th Street - Room 342 Greeley, Colorado 80631 Good Day to You All : Concerning the proposed change of zone, Twombley Ranch, Je as adjoining land owners , would like to make known our opposition. One reason being the scarcity of water. Je are concerned that the existing water, scarce as it is , will soon be depleted with the addition of several homes on the section. Will we be forced to cut back on irrigation water and allowed only our domestic water? Granted, this was an excellent year for moisture, but as we all know this year was a rare treat indeed for this normally dry country. ,Ve urge you not to grant approval for iwombley ranch. Sincerely, - ��c�z ;c ' ,- 1 _�_ Joan A . Hayes - Russell J. Hayes 1 i 1984 Weld Co. Planning Commission Hudson, Colorado September 14, 1984 Weld County Department of Planning Services 915 10th Street Room 342 Greeley, Colorado 80631 This letter is in regard to the proposed Twombly Ranch developement East of nudson. As farmers we oppose the developement. we would like to see agricultural land remain as such, it is a concern of ours that more and more land is being developed. It seems our area will be faced with more problems as to the water supply, contamination of the water, overcrowding of our schools and more roads for the county to try and maintain. We ask for a no vote on this developement. Yours truly, Gordon M. 'tipple Sharon M. Hupple 24376 W0t 8 Hudson, Colorado 80642 x'51 \--Q7E SEP 17 1984 Weld Co. Planning Commission Case Number COZ-407:84:8 yJ S ` v DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVIC-ES Ext-4400 PRO ME 13031 356-0000 91510TH STREET I`\ GREELEY,COLORADO 80631 h a1 4d ' 'y August 7, 1984 er'rn lk' 5, figir COLORADO -REFERRAL ' TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Enclosed is an application from Twombly Ranch c/o James Erger for a a Change of Zone from "A" (Agricultural) to "PAT ➢." (PlannnA nn4*_Deualopment) The parcel of land is described as Section 7, T1N, R64W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado The location of the parcel of land for which this application has been submitted is approximately 2 miles east of Hudson: south of State Highway 32 and pact of Weld County Road 49 -This application is submitted to your office for review and recommendations. Any comments or recommendations you consider relevant to this request would be ap- preciated. Your prompt reply will help to facilitate the processing of the pro- posal and will ensure prompt consideration of your recommendations. If a response from your office is not received within 14 days of mailing from our office, it may be interpreted to mean approval by your office. If you are unable to respond within 21 days (but wish to do so at a later date) please notify our office to that effect. Check the appropriate boxes below and return to our address listed above. Please reply by September 6. 1984. so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. 1. We have reviewed this request and find that the request (does/ does not) comply with our Comprehensive Plan for the following reasons: 2. We do not have a Comprehensive Plan but we feel this request (is/ is not) compatible with the interests of our town for the following reasons: • 3. A formal recommendation is under consideration and will be submitted to you prior to 4, JG Please refer to the enclosed letter. p Signed �U ✓� 9 t/ Agency /}o�� l Date ?/// Y Thank you very much for your help and co-operation in this matter. Michael S. Mullen, Current Planner Rnq_ MSM:rjg SEP 18 1984 Weld Cu. Planning Cnuimissitar vi CvL of .i L' AL 0-G-,1 Ca ke eJ ../(4-4,t-../(4-4,t- 0-1'4-4- �5 o-a el ("I , 1 xo� ( " U /� ma �.,✓�e (.tl-�'—. �f/ lI/.'Y� / ' /J �1 / 1-4,Q ci-0, T/N.r^.� W"—R.i .Zc ` I r /1) jz y>,,,i) :,- fri,,i,,,,,, et hr--...L.--i i 0-4-it/ LIISEP181984 Weld Co. Planning Commission a u a u a w A U W 0.i 6 N m W a W rl_lili cn rn P O (--) O .-1 q Pw. F `n a a N 0 �.: c w w a t, w u Cry q W F rn ...1 O1 x 'z.,' a a 6 W ¢ OU O Q CC O J O CI rr {yt{ts ....}St{{{tt SyS}}tt IiIIIII�IMilililit' :: IIiir , '. > ( S. .f U I " —:;":'''4�. ' 3aaa3S a3ea:::: = i iii r . •: . c. - IA an • Ty` ... W y .. :: •..-..L' C C 0 k,, ICC A•� •♦��•J, .1 { I r W dwctf2v is ro Y'al� ?t{, iit";-57,01,%41474M:: ]3 ray. 5r • p o.'''-< ..�; �� 3lx'.i . .. ''� �'. '� r� Acv a"' im lilL \ ..,.-. s x Ir kr SS• 5@}tsl l ( wln ",,,,,,z,, l l I1 S > . : , , �, ... ... ,r os,o8 a;e3}ssav ,1- 9. ){ S I{ J aah t: r' (yj}ff Si4 GoS' NOTICE Pursuant to the zoning laws of the State of Colorado and the Weld County Zoning Ordinance, a public hearing will be held in the Chambers of the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, Weld County Centennial Center, 915 10th Street, First Floor, Greeley, Colorado, at the time specified. All persons in any manner interested in the following proposed Change of Zone are requested to attend and may be heard. BE IT ALSO KNOWN that the text and maps so certified by the County Planning Commission may be examined in the office of the Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners , located in the Weld County Centennial Center, 915 10th Street, Third Floor, Greeley, Colorado. APPLICANT DOCKET NO. 84-69 Twombly Ranch c/o James Erger 7290 Magnolia Street Commerce City, Colorado 80022 DATE : November 7 , 1984 TIME : 2 : 00 P.M. REQUEST: Change of Zone - Agricultural to Planned Unit Development (Residential-One and Agricultural Uses) LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Section 7 , Township 1 North, Range 64 West of the 6th P .M. , Weld County, Colorado BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY, COLORADO BY: MARY ANN FEUERSTEIN COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER AND CLERK TO THE BOARD BY: Mary Reiff, Deputy DATED: October 1 , 1984 PUBLISHED: October 4 and 25 , 1984 , in the La Salle Leader -HEARING CERTIFICATION -DOCKET NO. 84-69 RE: CHANGE OF ZONE, A TO P.U.D. , TWOMBLY RANCH A public hearing was conducted on November 21, 1984, at 2:00 P.M. , with the following present: Commissioner Norman Carlson, Chairman Commissioner Jacqueline Johnson, Pro—Tem Commissioner Gene Brantner Commissioner Chuck Carlson, Excused Commissioner John Martin Also present: Acting Clerk to the Board, Mary Reiff Assistant County Attorney, Lee D. Morrison Planning Department Director, Chuck Cunliffe The following business was transacted: I hereby certify that pursuant to a notice dated October 1, 1984, and duly published October 4, and October 25, 1984, in the La Salle Leader, a public hearing was conducted to consider the application of Twombly Ranch for a Change of Zone from Agricultural to Planned Unit Development. Lee D. Morrison, Assistant County Attorney, read this application into the record and stated that a hearing concerning this application was conducted on November 7, which resulted in a tie vote. In accordance with the policy regarding land use applications, the Commissioner absent from that hearing, Commissioner Martin, had listened to the tapes of the earlier hearing and reviewed the record. Commissioner Martin voted for approval of the Change of Zone from A to P.U.D. as requested by Twombly Ranch; therefore, the Change of Zone, from Agricultural to Planned Unit Development was approved. APPROVED: a, BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ATTEST: /2f,� .L a-wm/ WELD COUNTY, COLORADO Weld County Jerk and Recorder -w vt- ,_ elPaa and Clerk to the Boar Norman Carlson, Chairman Deputy County Clerk q e ne Joh s n, Pro-Tem _ant Gene R. Brantner EXCUSED Chuck Carlson jek -Ain I j 72 a-14i; n T. Martin TAPE #84-124 DOCKET #84-69 LHR 2217 HEARING CERTIFICATION DOCKET DOCKET NO. 84-69 RE: CHANGE OF ZONE, A TO P.U.D. , TWOMBLY RANCH A public hearing was conducted on November 7, 1984, at 2:00 P.M. , with the following present: Commissioner Norman Carlson, Chairman Commissioner Jacqueline Johnson, Pro-Tem (Arrived Late) Commissioner Gene Brantner Commissioner Chuck Carlson Commissioner John Martin - Excused Also present: Acting Clerk to the Board, Debbie Campbell Assistant County Attorney, Lee D. Morrison Planning Department representative, Michael Mullen The following business was transacted: I hereby certify that pursuant to a notice dated October 1, 1984, and duly published October 4 and October 25, 1984, in the La Salle Leader, a public hearing was conducted to consider the application of Twombly Ranch for a Change of Zone from Agricultural to Planned Unit Development. Assistant County Attorney Lee D. Morrison read this application into the record. (Let the record reflect that Commissioner Johnson is now present) Planning Department representative Michael Mullen read the unfavorable recommendation of the Planning Commission into the record. Chairman N. Carlson informed the applicant that since there were only four Commissioners present, the fifth Commissioner would have to listen to the tape in case of a tie vote to -cast the deciding vote. Robert Gehler, Attorney representing the applicant, came forward to explain this proposal to the Board. Robert Fleming, Planning Consultant from Denver, also came forward. Those speaking in favor to the proposal were Norm Moser from the Soil Conservation District, Elizabeth Martin, Patricia Cook, James Erger, Raymond Kauffman, Fred Hubbs, Irene Boilers and Andrew Haller. Those speaking in opposition to the proposal were Robert Swank, Edward Bernhardt, Tom Lynch, from the Division of Wildlife, George Shaklee, Joan Hayes and Bob Fritzler. There was considerable discussion as to whether the number of animal units allowed per lot is compatible with other land uses under standards for a Change of Zone. Commissioner C. Carlson moved to approve this application for COZ, A to P.U.D. , including the covenants as a part of the conditions. Commissioner Brantner seconded the motion. Commissioners C. Carlson and Brantner voted aye and Chairman N. Carlson and Commissioner Johnson voted nay, with Commissioner Johnson giving her reasons for doing so. Commissioner Martin was excused from this hearing and will listen to the tapes to cast the deciding vote. APPROVED: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ATTEST: WELD COUNTY, COLORADO Weld County Clerk and Recorder ORn r and Clerk to the Bo d Norman Carlson, Chairman 722) Deputy County erk a..ueQao \ oh o , Pro-Tem �/ J Gene R.1Bran nef r EXCUSED DA!' , OF SIGNING Chuck Carlson EXCUSED TAPE #84-116 and #84-117 John T. Martin LOCKET #84-69 ATTTNIDANCI RECORD DATE: Nnvnmhar 7 , 1984 TODAY' S HEARINGS ARE AS FOLLOWS : (9) Should have been Docket X84-69 - Docket #84—b7 - COZ , A to P.U.D. , Twombly Ranch Docket #84-70 - Service Plan, -Tri Area Ambulance Service PLEASE write or print legibly your name, address and the DOCKET -# (as listed above) or the applicant ' s name of the hearing you are attending. NAME k /�_ / ADDRESS / HEARING ATTENDING _ / �i�,1�r� 17e.-tL�t`_' Yj 75-5- g7a�1 4u2_,4 ,krce L'f�r r .-6 7 ,6.?4 FL antii,✓4 /1,2'12-1 n/ 4.),/.. 14r,_ f• , k7' 6 7 )M q (4R 1454).1 C isi 01vd e 5v ) tis7t,„ C-0 -L7 Zier-e iiketK 35781 o<-k cl 4ett/i y Y y—E. 7 e� o. l ;35 ) j V ' C /% 10 itA-- 0-,-\ 31, 107 /eyL 1 Y°/- 70 G.., C �.u/ i:H t2i /Z/Z !'J/<7c�7d .1_., rC7� L/n�t e PIG i ed . 4 ii Ccd.^rr4rl(,L,', ,�.ai-ILA. 00, yo u,n &s eY-70 fi. 76 1 VI O, 'd 71 )b Ycf_6 7 Xy- 6 7i - y/ tC<c/w 7j ,a---Itty- 71---v -6 7 f ' h 154,1,- 54 /-f/ , c s 0 e�,,".� / j - 7 ICS 01/4A- Sc, ...� 3 5v, 1 Uu c. k S I k P , s ID Lk s til . ea'J • c - h ` £I c t °ems}_ JCilet' 1 -�-U-1i'�� / 5r�� ?� n♦ 1 TNIHW Pe i i cpizy9 L- . 1.yne' A ? 171/7-7 '7 }3r/ f�Ti;A 7 d � �� _7 2 7 /6C/C 2/t Aiii,% a .ZY- 7 r7 C� 7 �j J G/ Z 60)c-3c/ fib 5i'/ c hf2soA �7..1/a . cJ o / '•C h_r(�' 60)c-3t6" /�itzw-a�ctr /C;r_. St C S' c7.75/0/5C &-e ld .ci ' (,Y 6„6Qa.,.,, ;a... -� /Y021c0a tit r lie 115U I . 80,1hf� ; , <30L0V 1— ATTENDANCE RECORD DATE: Nnvemher 7 , 1984 TODAY' S HEARINGS ARE AS FOLLOWS: PLEASE write or print legibly your name, address and the DOCKET # (as listed above) or the applicant' s name of the hearing you are attending. E ADDRESS HEARING ATTENDING 4-4°)6 eg-ik itS/ /pi CALQ 619 ;:/9 3 o �e� „ A it0 P,o, So 7'9 "27 04) i; 41 70 DATE: October , 1984 TO: The -Board of County Commissioners Weld County, Colorado FROM: Clerk to the Board Office Commissioners: If you have no objections, we have tentatively set the following hearing for the 7th day of November, 1984 , at 2 : 00 P.M. Dorket #84-69 - Twombly Ranch, COZ, Agricultural to Rlannen Unit Development OFFICE OF THE CLERK SO THE BOARD BY: //..-c^f. Deputy The above mentioned hearing date and hearing time may _be scheduled on the agenda as stated above. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY, COLORADO i • r STATE OF COLORADO ) )ss. COUNTY OF WELD ) ...1 -j ij l 1 U. :2 bP5 being duly sworn, says that-he/she is pub- i lisher of the KEE' NE VALLEY SUN, Ollle a weekly newspaper published and - printed in Keenesburg in said County , i a public hearing - la and State; that said newspaper has a general circulation in said County -the Chambers o£:the -Board of and has been continuously and un- - County.Comabla er' of interruptedly published therein, dur- Colorado.Weld ing a period of at least fifty-two consecutive weeks prior to the first ' publication of the annexed notice; that said newspaper is a newspaper - _ the tingeperffied• �` within the meaning of the act of the lit any ID811ner 117 General Assembly of the State of in �-�." the following propod to Colorado, entitled "An Act to raga- nfZone-are requested to late the printing of legal notices and - Mei and may be heard. advertisements," and amendments Be it also known that the text -thereto;that the notice of which the and maps Jso certified by the annexed is a printed copy taken from County -Planning Comn fission said newspaper, was published in said may be examinedin the office of newspaper, and in the regular and entire issue of every number thereof, the Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners, located in the a week for / successive Weld County Centennial Center, once that ek said notice was so pub- 915 10th Street, -Third Floor, weeks; Greeley, Colorado. fished in said newspaper proper and -- not in any supplement thereof, and Docket No. 84$8: Applicant: Er- that-the first publication of said no- gar 729 y Ranch,C/O James Ei- J t -ger 7290 olio Street,_Com- tice as aforesaid, was on the lneree City, Colorado 80022. , Date: Nov.-7, 1984. Time 2:oo day of _. m. --Request: Change ,of L11-114-1211, 19. Zone-Agriculture to Planned Unit Development (Residential- and the last on the day of One and Agriculture Uses( Legal Description: . Section 7, , 19 Township 1 North, Range -64 ,/ West of the p.m., Weld County Colorado. Board of - County Commissioners, Weld County,Colorado,By:ldary Ann Feuerstein, County Clerk and ecorder and Clarkin the Board Subscribed and sworn to before me 1 s t� suit-Oa.A IS this 7---3 day of -- 19_f1(/y HARRY L.VENTER 82.5.SECOND-AVENue DEER TRAIL,COLO.80103 , My Commiasio0 EApkst l. P , /: AND I3iAT 1'Hi. SAME IS CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND -BELIEF.B GERALD B. McRAE, PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER AND `.` P GDSBE 6 ,Q4 LAND SURVEYOR, COLORADO REG. NO. 6616 1 O•t^ 7 ;4; -6616 • s St- 0 95'x , b L-S, r"OplCiOt-',07 • Lacer a AC O a i : (. . .. . - - - A HI ij` J.,M 0L32 NF ANN FEUERSTEIN CLERK & R )RDER WELD CO, CO REEON/NC PLAT 71 CASE NO. Z - 407: 84 : 8 c- '4" AGRICULTURAL TO "p U. D. " PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT m (RESIDENTIAL-ONE AND AGRICULTURAL USES ) COLORADO STATE HIGHWAY NO. 52 _ N 89°56'00'6 5/_7_4.90' C t Nor/haves/ corner Sec. 7 N.E. cor. Sec. 7----Af ri-if Poin/ of Beginning ; 0 0% go N h 141 N O • SECT/ON 7, TOil/NSN/P / NORTH, RANGE 04 !VEST41 Q QO 623.950 ACRES � • ' • . ; O � , C � Zit- oo h ~ V o j N Scale: /"=1000'el Cri V • = existing monumen/g zc SIcot. Sec. 7 S.E. cor. Sec. 7IW x S. 89°43'29"Gf/ 5///. 88' 19 WELD COUNTY ROAD NO. /O b �� t LEGAL DESCRIPTION ni / ALL OF SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 1 NORTH, RANGE 64 WEST OF THE 6th P.M. , WELD COUNTY, COLORADO, AND BEING DESCRIBED AS; BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 7 AND CONSIDERING THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 7 TO BEAR NORTH 89° 56' 00" EAST WITH ALL OTHER BEARINGS CONTAINED HEREIN BEING RELATIVE THERETO; THENCE NORTH 89° 56' 00" EAST, 5174.90 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 7; THENCE SOUTH 00° 58' 52" WEST, 5229.92 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 7; THENCE SOUTH 89° 43' 29" WEST, 5111 .88 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 7; THENCE NORTH 00° 17' 37" EAST, 5299.81 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; SAID SECTION 7 CONTAINS 623.950 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE I DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAT WAS PREPARED UNDER MY SUPERVISION ON JUNE 6, 1984, AND THAT BELIEF. 'T THE SAME IS CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND GERALD B. MCRAE, PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER AND 'cell G'P...E 9� LAND SURVEYOR, COLORADO REG. N0. 6616 � �'P. HCe.- " : 6616 aiounsinntoo • '-- n^' �•rn -- ,., ,,-_ SWEET t of 2 'yr ,. . r. r. ,-it , ic 'b : J6 $6 . 00 2/002 F 0435 MAR ANN FEUERSTEIN CLERK & RE( ADER WELD CO, CO PROPERTY OWNER'S APPROVAL LLOYD LAND AND RONALD COOK, BEING THE SOLE OWNERS IN FEE OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY, DO HEREBY REQUEST THE ZONING AS SHOWN ON THE ATTACHED MAP. B Y : �r�.-o /y _ JAM ERGER, WITH PO R OF ATTORNEY STATE OF COLORADO COUNTY OF WELD )ss THE FOREGOING CERTIFICATION WAS ACKNOWLEDGED BEFORE ME THIS 57) a� 1 D DAY OF�' s A.D. , 1984 BY JAMES ERGER, WITH POWER OF ATTORNEY FOR LLOYD LAND AND RONALD COOK. WITNESS MY HANDAND SEAL. MY COMMISSI EXPIRES : (i �`1Bfa het?' wil'Arto fC a,,...` NOTARY PUBLIC I'� res7 st Co F:96.7./ 0; .% . PLANNING COMMISSION CERTIFICATION THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE WELD COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION DOES HEREBY RECOMMEND TO THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, WELD COUNTY, COLORADO DENIAL OF THIS ZONE CHANGE AS SHOWN AND ES IBED HEREO T IS ow DAY OF Sep♦. 1984. HAIRAN, PLANNING COMMISSION BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONER'S CERTIFICATION THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS , WELD COUNTY, COLORADO DOES HEREBY CONFIRM, APPROVE AND ADOPT THIS ZONE CHANGE AS SHOWN AND DESCRIBED HEREON THIS .' DAY uOF � / 1984. ATTEST: """"^ e7 COUNT CLERK CHAIRMAN, BOARD OF COUNTY UT COMMISSIONERS 'C•SI DEPO�� Cet RECORDED: DATE: Mc RAF ,SHORT, /NC. /7?7 R,A Ac n , r+.,,n i,,,, n, ,, SHEET e 2"- O< • Affidavit of Publication SSA= OF CCLORACO. 1 as County a! Weld. ) L Pail Massey of said County of Weld. being duly sworn. say that 1 am pubusher of ' La Salle Leader Legal Notice that the same is a weekly newspaper of general • cirarla¢on cad punted and published in the Pmean4lae the 4:40111955445:9— *we town et La -Salle d Coloradohtan w the Zs uta orde.;.lnblic Amin aw be lieu In the Chambers dyRoerd y in said county and stale: that the notice or adver- gaietyCwnu,6pm„rs d. Cerny. - - twment. of which the annexed is a true ropy, Colorado, Weld Ceund' atannlal has been published in said weekly newspaper Crater, 416 16th StrM t43 p flier. . Cawley.Colorado.at meatsa4iped4ed. for tWO Al Iverson In any manner hilmaeted In works: that the notice was published In the quested to.een39:0110:9099 the Use By Special Reis dmd mew*beard�e regular and entire issue et every number ci said gE IT-ALSO-KNOWN Stir tat and newspaper dug the period and time of pubii iaens w cabled sp the Cony n cotton et said nonce and in the newspaper titffisellee of thePlugs eCCat toil i d proper and not in a supplement-thereof: iliac the crests comae:ems,• '- "m me Brat publication of said nWlce was contained in Weld County CenteidJ 916 10th Suer,,Thud ESN Col- the issue of said, newspaper bearing dale. tithe orado. .. . day et October A.7.. 19 81t DOCKET NO.14.69 and the last pubic,-ours thereof. in lig-.issue al - M and newspaper bearing date.pthe ._, day c: _ Ranch October . 19VJe1.: that the said 7490M AOROde8 ee Commerce dt cO5WYY La Salle Leader DATE:November i,19s4,- has been published continuously and unlnternipt. TIME:SO P.M. Sly during the period at at least Itteywa con. REQUEST: Change cif'Zone 'Cod weeks next peter to the lint issue thereof Ajdfuhad to Palmed Ude DewbP- eoateining said notice or advertisement above mm IRaeYentld•One maul Apicdtad Ilex) retorted to and that said newspaper was at the . lime of e ach of the publications of said notice. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: duly qualified for that purpose within the mean- sense 7.Township I Niel Ramie64 fag al an act, entitled. "An Act Concerning Legal West d the 6th P.M.,WeYCaeny.Cd- - orado Notices, Advertisements and Pubhcamms. and BOARDOPCOUMy the Fees of Printers end Publishers Thereof, and COMWEISIONERS WELDCOUNry.t0LORADO to Repeal all Acts and Parts of Acts in Conflict with the Provisions of this Act." approved April 7. BY:MARY ANPIFRUERSTEIN 1921. and all amendments thereof, and =dewCosst�AND CLERIC TLERK TOOt DD laxly as amended by an a;t approved. Marrs 33. RY:Mryi fDyuy 1923, act =prayed 1 l9. 1931. (// _.. .7 /�J��rA DATED:October 1,1964 w1r >° PASS la de L IS, Lamer ubiisher 7lnedere. October 4. 1!M and Oc- y WS 6.vs. Subscribed en worn to before me this d 9 sue_ -� day of j /r7� 1 te-) A.D. l9 r / �;v My ccmrasian expires //— 7-0.3 --- Notary Public EUZAQETH AriA.s Ey GRtEE(E C n.✓ >/J c< 80631 Hello