The URL can be used to link to this page

Browse Search

Home My WebLink About20061808.tiff KITELEY RANCH AT FOSTER LAKE AFFIDAVIT OF INTEREST OWNERS MINERALS AND/OR SUBSURFACE Property Legal Description: Sao attarhad Property Legal Parcel Number: 1207-27-0-00=047 STATE OF COLORADO ) )ss. COUNTY OF WELD ) THE UNDERSIGNED, being first duly sworn, states that b the best of his or her knowledge, the attached ist is a true and accurate list of the names and addresses of all mineral owners and lessees of mineral owners on or under the parcel of land being considered. The list shall be prepared from the real property records by a person qualified to do the task, and shall be current as of a date more than thirty (30)days prior to be date the applcatbn Is submitted to the Department of Planning Services. Note: Mineral Notification Is in addition to that required by C.R.S. 24-65.5-102 through 104. AGENT FOR OWNER: LONGS PEAK INVESTORS, LLC ry Eckel er T' e:Member Ma er The foregoing instrument was subscrbed and sworn to me this 76(..day of )20 05 by: Jerry Eckelberger, Member/Manager of Longs Peak In e o , Agent for WITNESS my hand and official seal. Owner. My Commission Expire Ca 1) a-00 6 SITE A-``‘t 4°tthwPub1r I / : : % i it V'>,:.,o / /it t‘ P COO:"— EXHIBIT 167.G . 2006-1808 12/05/2005 3:19:01 PM mo2 Rft File No.: 256-H0054809-042-JAN,Amendment No.4 Exhibit A Lot B of Recorded Exemption No. 1208-27-2-RE 843 as recorded in Book 1111,Film 1383,Reception No. 02052248,Weld County Records,being more particularly described as follows: That tract of land located in the Northwest one-quarter of Section 27,Township 3 North,Range 68 West of the 6t° P.M.,Weld County,Colorado being more particularly described as follows: Considering the West line of the Northwest one-quarter as assumed to bear North 00°03'44"West and with all bearings contained herein relative thereto: Beginning at the West one-quarter corner of said Section 27;thence North 00°03'44"West 2651.99 feet to the Northeast corner of said Section 27;thence North 89°48'39"2637.30 feet to the North one-quarter corner of said Section 27;thence along the East line of the Northwest one-quarter of said Section 27, South 00°42'51"West 1500.73 feet;thence along the Northwesterly boundary of that parcel of land described by deed recorded in Book 207 at Page 395 of Weld County Records,the following three(3)courses: South 51°37'52"West 507.62 feet; South 52°39'03"West 394.00 feet thence South 39°24'03"West 765.00 feet to a point on the South line of the Northwest one-quarter of said Section 27;thence South 89°24'03"West 1125.18 feet to the Southeast corner of Lot A of Recorded Exemption No. 1208-27-2-RE 843 as recorded in Book 1111,Reception No.02052248,Weld County Records;thence along the East,North and West line of said Lot A the following three(3)courses: North 00°03'44"West 233.34 feet; South 89°24'03"West 263.82 feet; South 00°03'44"East 233.34 feet to a point on the South line of the Northwest one-quarter of said Section 27;thence South 89°24'03"West 30.00 feet to the West one-quarter corner of said Section 27 and the True Point of Beginning,except any portion lying within rights of way, County of Weld,State of Colorado. Legal description prepared by: Steven John Stencel,Colorado PLS 30462,for and on behalf of Intermill Land Surveying,Inc., 1301 North Cleveland Avenue,Loveland,Colorado 80537, (970)669-0516. EXHIBIT A TO AFFIDAVIT OF INTEREST OWNERS MINERALS AND/OR SUBSURFACE ESTATE RE: Kiteley Ranch at Foster Lake P.U.D./Preliminary Plat Mineral Owners and Lessees Addresses Kerry-McGee 1999 Broadway, Suite 3700 Rocky Mountain Corporation Denver, CO 80202 Attention Mr. Terry Enright Ernest M. and Florence G. Kiteley 13844 Weld County Road 7 Longmont, CO 80504 Jerome M. and Diane L. Klum 13522 County Road 7 Longmont, CO 80504 Highland Ditch Co. 4311 Highway 66 Longmont, CO 80504-9629 Dated:December 7,2005 Highland Ditch Co. LANDS ARCHITECTS 4311 highway 66 perspective I balance a subsidiary of Longmont, CO 80504 land architects international Highlands Ranch, CO Fort Collins, CO Mountain View, CA To Whom It May Concern: NOTICE: WELD COUNTY, COLORADO, PLANNING COMMISSION HEARING TO BE HELD ON K!TELEYRANCH CHANGE OF ZONE APPLICATION On behalf of Weld County, Colorado, Longs Peak Investors, LLC and Land Architects invite you to attend the Planning Commission Hearing regarding the Kiteley Ranch, Change of Zone Application, currently in process with the Weld County Department of Planning Services. The property is currently zoned for agricultural use and Longs Peak Investors, LLC proposes to change the zoning to PUD to allow for a residential development. This notice is being mailed to you from the Applicant, as required by state law, as you have been identified as a mineral interest owner or lease- holder. The Planning Commission Hearing has been scheduled as follows: Location: Weld County Planning Services Bldg. Room: Meeting Room Address: 91810 Street Greeley, CO 80631 e am O . Time/Date: 1:30 PM, Tuesday, March 7, 2006 I- v ; cam cr, a S cipnC s : Sincerely, w , L N_ Crea Ln 1� ca '74J Joshua Rowland/Project Manager N Q W fl ,.., To di z' o W > - U �v 2z N NWE �CC mE 1;4 re a Q6, n r r, M 059 2 CE E000 09TT soot 9137 South Ridgeline Boulevard,Suite 130 • Highlands Ranch,Colorado 80129 1303.734.1777 • Fax 303.734.1778 Land Planting I Resort & Golf Course Design I Landscape Architecture 3wwaandar7hitects71e₹-. 1825 Sharo Point Drive.Suite 126 • Fort Collins.Colorado 80525 1970.484.4100 • Fax 970.484.4111 Jerome and Diane Klum LAND al ARCHITECTS perspective balance 13522 County Road 7 a subsidiary of Longmont, CO 80504 land architects international Highlands Ranch, CO Fort Collins, CO Mountain View, CA Dear Mr. and Mrs. Klum, NOTICE: WELD COUNTY, COLORADO, PLANNING COMMISSION HEARING TO BE HELD ON KITELEY RANCH CHANGE OF ZONE APPLICATION On behalf of Weld County, Colorado, Longs Peak Investors, LLC and Land Architects invite you to attend the Planning Commission Hearing regarding the Kiteley Ranch, Change of Zone Application, currently in process with the Weld County Department of Planning Services. The property is currently zoned for agricultural use and Longs Peak Investors, LLC proposes to change the zoning to PUD to allow for a residential development. This notice is being mailed to you from the Applicant, as required by state law, as you have been identified as a mineral interest owner or lease- holder. The Planning Commission Hearing has been scheduled as follows: Location: Weld County Planning Services Bldg. Room: Meeting Room Address: 918 10m Street Greeley, CO 80631 a Time/Date: 1:30 PM, Tuesday, March 7, 2006 a tea? o F." IN a a , •Sincerely, s. U g o Joshua Rowland/Project Manager Q e. 2 _ tS W _ • a W N C .. p� li u o. It?, m Trot I' ' 'n?w. a§p9 m li c Ptl Z' a sicc a '+ . CC E- u V' ` E asCI) go ro • ul ao F d a `c ° z .• M w ¢w m m `o o Eh99 22z't E000 0911 S00L 9137 South Ridgeline Boulevard,Suite 130 • Highlands Ranch,Colorado 80129 1303.734.1777 • Fax 303.734.1778 Land Planning l Resort & Goff Course Design i Landscape Architecture -ww waandarchitectsnet- -- IR25 Sham Point Drive.Suite 126 • Fort Collins.Colorado 80525 1970.484.4100 • Fax 970.484.4111 Ernest and Florence Kiteley LAND ARCHITECTS perspective balance 13844 Weld County Road 7 o subsidiary of Longmont, CO 80504 land architects international Highlands Ranch, CO Fort Collins, CO Mountain View, CA Dear Mr. and Mrs. Kiteley, NOTICE: WELD COUNTY, COLORADO, PLANNING COMMISSION HEARING TO BE HELD ON KITELEY RANCH CHANGE OF ZONE APPLICATION On behalf of Weld County, Colorado, Longs Peak Investors, LLC and Land Architects invite you to attend the Planning Commission Hearing regarding the Kiteley Ranch, Change of Zone Application, currently in process with the Weld County Department of Planning Services. The property is currently zoned for agricultural use and Longs Peak Investors, LLC proposes to change the zoning to PUD to allow for a residential development. This notice is being mailed to you from the Applicant, as required by state law, as you have been identified as a mineral interest owner or lease- holder. The Planning Commission Hearing has been scheduled as follows: Location: Weld County Planning Services Bldg. Room: Meeting Room Address: 918 10m Street Greeley, CO 80631 e 7 g -. Time/Date: 1:30 PM, Tuesday, March 7, 2006 o 0, d W ; 6n Sincerely, U O v tb jC t areci N J S —9 z Joshua Rowland/Project Manager ?° c Ca O � {Q ! LL IL m li m d ¢t o� 3 zZ q !A �yJ E a M d d a a ¢$ m L�11R 2` N 1� V 9_ :to oz, w Q F m v R w y q o U • M 9E99 2214 E000 0944 S00Z 9137 South Ridgeline Boulevard,Suite 130 • Highlands Ranch,Colorado 80129 1303.734.1777 • Fax 303.734.1778 Land Planning I Resort & Golf Course Design I Landscape Architecture www.landarchitectsmet 1825 Sham Point Drive.Suite 126 • Fort Collins.Colorado 80525 l 970.484.4100 • Fax 970.484.4111 LANDMr. Terry Enright I ARCHITECTS perspective I balance Kerry-McGee a subsidiary of 1999 Broadway, Suite 3700 land architects international Denver, CO 80202 Highlands Ranch, co Fort Collins, CO Mountain View, CA Dear Mr. Enright, NOTICE: WELD COUNTY, COLORADO, PLANNING COMMISSION HEARING TO BE HELD ON KITELEY RANCH CHANGE OF ZONE APPLICATION On behalf of Weld County, Colorado, Longs Peak Investors, LLC and Land Architects invite you to attend the Planning Commission Hearing regarding the Kiteley Ranch, Change of Zone Application, currently in process with the Weld County Department of Planning Services. The property is currently zoned for agricultural use and Longs Peak Investors, LLC proposes to change the zoning to PUD to allow for a residential development. This notice is being mailed to you from the Applicant, as required by state law, as you have been identified as a mineral interest owner or lease- holder. The Planning Commission Hearing has been scheduled as follows: Location: Weld County Planning Services Bldg. Room: Meeting Room Address: 91810 Street Greeley, CO 80631 v O` '�. O, E2 Time/Date: 1:30 PM, Tuesday, March 7, 2006 H. v - N a a � O wN, .! v ,- ,0 0 Sincerely, w �„ in a Cc o ' oa • � d Fs ert. a ' yet, d J i G Z I. C1 Q 4-' r, a Joshua Rowland/Project Manager N . _ -- ° pp�� vDO ,j �, ? c» T LLI . m� m �{ ' R WW n 1� LL LLm 4� N LLC ° a 3 my mg m r ... O V r u[[ Q ^l. a b > N 8 ¢. o 5 m V�]�.7= cc cu _ U `• 1(1 ¢'a sn m - yya y O •• r •. Fn.* w ])'-`2 15 CLL 2 6299 22L't E000 09Yt 5001. 9137 South Ridgeline Boulevard,Suite 130 • Highlands Ranch,Colorado 80129 1303.734.1777 • Fax 303.734.1778 Land Planning I Resort & Golf Course Design I Landscape Architecture - wwwiandarchitects.net- _. 1825 Share Point Drive.Suite 126 • Fort Collins.Colorado 80525 1970.484.4100 • Fax 970.484.4111 April 14, 2006 Mrs. Sheri Lockman Weld County Department of Planning Services 918 10th Street Greeley, CO 80631 RE: PZ-1082 Kiteley Ranch PUD Change of Zone, Response to Administrative Recommendation Conditions of Approval Dear Sheri: This letter is intended to provide clarification to the R-1 zoning variance requests outlined in the Administrative Recommendation, and to explain how the applicant has addressed conditions of approval stated in the Administrative Recommendation that we received from Staff on 4/12/2006. Variances from R-1 Zoning: 1. Applicant requests a minimum lot size of 6,000 s.f. for single family residential lots. This is consistent with the R-1 Zone district standards. In Staff's report, Section 27- 2-40 Bulk Requirements, the minimum lot size requested is 6,270 s.f. This is the size of the smallest lot currently being proposed in the Kiteley Ranch PUD. The applicant wishes to set the minimum lot size at 6,000 s.f. in the event that a future builder wishes to adjust lot widths to suit a specific product. 2. Applicant requests a 200' setback from oil and gas production facilities, and 150' setback from oil and gas wells and separator units. With the Change of Zone Application, the applicant submitted a Draft Surface Use Agreement and letter from Kerr McGee stating their participation with the agreement and support of the project. Kerr McGee and the County have allowed the requested setbacks on the nearby Adler Estates project and have agreed to do so with Kiteley Ranch in the Draft Surface Use Agreement. The Applicant agrees to have the Surface Use Agreement authorized by Kerr Mc Gee before being heard by the BOCC. 3. Applicant requests the Kiteley Ranch PUD be allowed the proposed signage concept that is in excess of the allowable signaqe area, and deviates from requirements regarding sign placement per Code (23-4-80 &27-6-90). This request is in response to the condition of approval from Staff that requires the applicant to address the concerns of the Sheriffs Department. The Sheriff has requested the applicant provide signage at each entry of the neighborhood. The provision of additional signage will in turn exceed the allowable signage area. EXHIBIT ) ,_6 ar Response and Resolution to Conditions of Approval: The applicant has provided the following responses to the Conditions of Approval as stated in the Administrative Recommendation provided by Staff; ..ele..,..®1A .A.' ..d,.euI , ._ .. *4... Prior to scheduling the Board of County Commissioners hearing: A. The applicant shall address the following to the satisfaction of the Weld County Department of Public Works. Evidence of such shall be submitted to the Department of Planning Services: 1) The applicant shall provide a schedule of recommended roadway improvements and proposed agreements that will mitigate the traffic impacts of the proposed development. Response: The applicant has submitted an addendum to the traffic report, with this letter as Exhibit A, to address the phasing of off site improvements as is relates to the build-out of Kiteley Ranch. The applicant agrees to provide the information as requested. 2) The applicant shall revise the zoning plat to delineate and dimension the State Highway 66 reservation on the Kiteley property and delineate and dimension the proposed Highland Ditch/ Recreational Trail easement outside and south of the State Highway 66 right-of-way reservation. Response: The applicant has provided an updated Change of Zone Plat, submitted with this letter as Exhibit B, to show the dimensioning of the Highland Ditch and SH 66 easements. 3) The applicant shall obtain written verification from the Highland Ditch that no additional easement is required in light of the future widening of State Highway 66. Response: The applicant has obtained the written verification requested by Staff from the Highland Ditch Company, submitted with this letter as Exhibit C. The applicant presented the concerns of Weld County Public Works to the Highland Ditch Company Board of Directors on April 10, 2006. The ditch company representatives indicated they could support the issues discussed at the meeting (location of easements, erosion concerns, shared maintenance road/trail, safety concerns)with the exception of providing an additional fence along the ditch, as presented in a letter to the Highland Ditch Company dated April 10, 2006 and submitted with this letter as Exhibit D. 4) The applicant shall provide a letter from the Town of Mead indicating their concerns regarding County Road 7 have been met. If that letter cannot be supplied the applicant should outline, in detail, all efforts that have been made to acquire Mead's approval. Response : The applicant has obtained a letter of support regarding CR 7 concerns from the Town of Mead, submitted with this letter as Exhibit E. The applicant has been very involved with the Town of Mead and surrounding developers in discussions regarding improvements of the CR 7 corridor and at the intersection of SH 66 and CR 7. The applicant intends to provide formal access agreements with the Town of Mead at the time of the Final Plat application. 5) The applicant shall provide a schematic layout of future intersection improvements at State Highway 66 and County Road 7,taking into consideration alignment with County Road 7 to the north, and showing and dimensioning any required additional right-of-way on the change of zone plat. Response: The applicant has provided a schematic layout of future intersection improvements, submitted with this letter as Exhibit F. The layout shows that the proposed 100' right of way is adequate for all proposed improvements. However, improvements to the existing Highland Ditch crossings at the intersection will be required to accommodate ultimate build out of the intersection. 6) All rights-of-way shall be dimensioned on the Change of Zone plat. Response: The applicant has submitted an updated Change of Zone Plat, with this letter as Exhibit B, to show the dimensioning of all rights of way in the PUD. 7) The applicant shall provide an agreement between the Highland Ditch and the applicant addressing joint use and adequacy of the proposed easements. Response: The applicant agrees to provide the requested agreement. The applicant has obtained a letter of support from the Highland Ditch company, submitted with this letter as Exhibit C. The applicant presented the concerns of Weld County Public Works to the Highland Ditch Company Board of Directors on April 10, 2006. The ditch company representatives indicated they could support the issues discussed at the meeting (location of easements, erosion concerns, shared maintenance road/trail, safety concerns) with the exception of providing an additional fence along the ditch, as presented in a letter to the Highland Ditch Company dated April 10, 2006 and submitted with this letter as Exhibit D. 8) The applicant shall provide an agreement with the owner of the property to the south (Anderson)for the relocation of the irrigation ditch. Response: The applicant has provided an authorized agreement with James Anderson, submitted with this letter as Exhibit G. 9) The applicant shall address off-site drainage, erosion in the Highland Ditch and revise the drainage report to meet all Weld County drainage criteria. (Department of Public Works) Response: The applicant agrees to address issues related to off-site drainage and revisions to the Drainage Report. The applicant presented the concerns of Weld County Public Works to the Highland Ditch Company Board of Directors on April 10, 2006. The ditch company representatives indicated they would cooperate with the Applicant to improve erosion in the Highland Ditch. B. The plats shall be amended to show any gathering line easements for the existing oil and gas structures along with proposed relocation if necessary. (Department of Planning Services) Response: The applicant agrees to provide easements for existing oil and gas gathering lines. There is only one (1) existing gathering line on the property and Kerr McGee has not proposed to add additional lines. The existing line is located in the open space and does not effect proposed development. C. The applicant shall either submit to the Department of Planning Services a copy of an agreement with the properties mineral owners and lessees stipulating that the oil and gas activities have adequately been incorporated into the design of the site, or indicate the 400' x 400'and the 800'x 800' drilling envelope locations per state statute. (Department of Planning Services) Response: The applicant agrees to provide the authorized Surface Use Agreement with Kerr McGee prior to the BOCC, Change of Zone hearing. D. The plats shall be amended so that proposed entry signs are outside of the future road right-of-way and proposed 25' utility easement. Further, signage must meet the appropriate setback of fifteen (15) feet from adjacent properties and the offset of ten (10) feet from the road right-of-way per section 27-6-90.E.4.d of the Weld County Code. If these distances cannot be met, the applicant shall request a variance from Section 27-6-90.E.4. of the Weld County Code. (Department of Planning Services) Response: The applicant is currently showing the proposed entry signage in the entry median island in a location within the CR 7, 100' right of way but outside of the 25' utility easement. The applicant requests that the signage be allowed in the proposed location so that it is visible from CR 7, as it does not negatively impact the proposed geometry of the intersection. The same location is proposed at the south entry drive in response to comments from the Sheriffs Department. 6. Prior to recording the Change of Zone plat: A. All sheets of the Change of Zone plat shall be labeled PZ-1082. (Department of Planning Services) Response: The applicant has provided an updated Change of Zone Plat, submitted with this letter as Exhibit B, to show the addition of "PZ-1082" to each sheet. B. The applicant shall address the concerns of the Weld County Sheriff's Office, as stated in a memo dated February 21, 2006 and incorporate remedies for these concerns. Written evidence of a solution shall be provided to the Department of Planning Services. (Sheriff's Office) Response: The applicant agrees to address the concerns of the Weld county Sheriffs Office as requested. C. The applicant shall submit details of the proposed mailbox areas to the appropriate postal district for review and approval. Any required changes shall be indicated on the plat. Further, the applicant shall verify that each facility meets the intent of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) for access. (Department of Planning Services) Response: The applicant has provided an updated Change of Zone Plat, submitted with this letter as Exhibit B, to show the revisions to the mailbox areas as suggested by Staff. The applicant had previously met with a representative from the Longmont Post Office to confirm that the proposed mailbox areas were acceptable. The mailbox areas shown provide ADA accessible access to the mailboxes opposite the street side via concrete pads and walkways. D. The plat shall be amended as follows: 1) The plat shall show a connection from Silver Sky Circle to Hyland in the Mead Crossing development to the east prior to recording the zone change plat. (Department of Public Works) Response: The applicant maintains that the provision of the access required by Staff introduces safety concerns to the Kiteley Ranch community and thus has not shown the access on the plat at this time. The applicant respectfully requests the BOCC provide direction on the matter at the time of the BOCC, Change of Zone hearing. From our conversations with the Highland Ditch Company, we understand the ditch company is adverse to adding a vehicular crossing along this difficult section of the ditch. 2) The plat shall show a pedestrian connection to the Mead Crossing development to the east prior to recording the change of zone plat. (Department of Planning Services) Response: The applicant has provided an updated Change of Zone Plat, submitted with this letter as Exhibit B, to show the trail connection to Mead Crossing as requested by Staff. 3) Amended MUD Structural Land Use Map 2.1, dated April 2006 shows plans for a trail connection along Foster Reservoir.A trail shall be established along the southeastern edge of �-- the property connecting to Pioneer Drive. The trail shall also include a linkage to the property to the south for the planned future regional trail system. (Department of Planning Services) Response: The applicant has provided an updated Change of Zone Plat, submitted with this letter as Exhibit B, to show the trail along Foster Reservoir and connection to the property south of Kiteley Ranch as requested by Staff. 4) A link from the trail adjacent to County Road 7 to the south end of Silent Point shall be added. (Department of Planning Services) Response: The applicant has provided an updated Change of Zone Plat, submitted with this letter as Exhibit B, to show the trail connection from Silent Point Ct. as requested by Staff. 5) The plat shall indicate the location of school bus shelters. Evidence of St.Vrain Valley School District approval shall be submitted to the Department of Planning Services. If necessary, a variance to setbacks must be requested prior to approval of the change of zone. Further,the applicant shall verify that each facility meets the intent of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) for access. (Department of Planning Services) Response: The applicant agrees to address the concerns of the Weld county Sheriffs Office as it relates to the provision of bus shelters as requested. 6) "Weld County's Right to Farm"as provided in Appendix 22-E of the Weld County Code shall be delineated on the plat. (Department of Planning Services) Response: The applicant has provided an updated Change of Zone Plat, submitted with this letter as Exhibit B, to show the "Weld County's Right to Farm" note as requested by Staff. This note has already been shown on previous submittals of the plat. 7) The extension of Pioneer Drive (S) south of Silver Sky Circle (S) shall be designated as a future road connection to be developed upon the development of the property to the south. (Department of Planning Services) Response: The applicant has provided an updated Change of Zone Plat, submitted with this letter as Exhibit B, to show the designated road as a future connection as requested by Staff. E. The applicant shall submit two (2) paper copies of the plat for preliminary approval to the Weld County Department of Planning Services. (Department of Planning Services) Response: So noted.. 3. The Change of Zone is conditional upon the following and that each shall be placed on the Change of Zone plat as notes prior to recording: Response: The applicant has provided an updated Change of Zone Plat, submitted with this letter as Exhibit B, to show the plat notes as requested below by Staff. C. The site specific development plan is for a Change of Zone from A(Agricultural)to PUD(Planned Unit Development)for 429 residential lots, open space and continuing oil and gas production as indicated in the application materials on file in the Department of Planning Services. The residential lots will adhere to the uses allowed in the R-1 (Low-Density Residential)Zone District except as indicated below. The PUD will be subject to and governed by the Conditions of Approval stated hereon and all applicable Weld County Regulations. (Department of Planning Services) D. The minimum setbacks shall follow the exhibit on page 3 of this change of zone plat. (Department of Planning Services) E. The minimum lot size shall be 6,000 square feet. (Department of Planning Services) F. Storage of vehicles or recreational vehicles shall only be allowed inside garages that are a part of the principle use structure. Storage of vehicles or recreational vehicles within carports and/or parking areas are not allowed. (Department of Planning Services) G. The minimum setback from an oil and gas production facility shall be 200' setback from oil and qas production facilities, and 150' setback from oil and qas wells and separator units (Department of Planning Services) H. Livestock is prohibited. (Department of Planning Services) I. Household pets are limited to two (2). (Department of Planning Services) J. Two (2) entry signs of thirty-two (32) square feet. (Department of Planning Services) K. A Metropolitan District has been established. The District is responsible for liability insurance, taxes and maintenance of open space, streets, private utilities and other facilities. Open space restrictions are permanent. (Department of Planning Services) L. A Homeowner's Association has been established. Membership in the Association is mandatory for each parcel owner. (Department of Planning Services) M. Kiteley Ranch is a member of the Southwestern Weld'County Law Enforcement District and shall be taxed accordingly. (Department of Planning Services) N. Weld County's Right to Farm as delineated on this plat shall be recognized at all times. (Department of Planning Services) O. Water service shall be obtained from Longs Peak Water District. (Department of Public Health and Environment) P. Sewer service shall be obtained from the St. Vrain Sanitation District. (Department of Public Health and Environment) Q. Permanent restroom and handwashing facilities shall be provided within easy access of all public gathering areas. (Department of Public Health and Environment) R. All existing septic systems must be abandoned in accordance with Section 30-7-70 of the Weld County Code. (Department of Planning Services) S. A stormwater discharge permit may be required for a development/redevelopment/construction site where a contiguous or non-contiguous land disturbance is greater than or equal to one acre in area. Contact the Water Quality Control Division of the Colorado Department of Public Health and the Environment at www.cdphe.state.co.us/wq/PermitsUnit for more information. (Department of Public Health and Environment) T. During development of the site, all land disturbances shall be conducted so that nuisance conditions are not created. If dust emissions create nuisance conditions, at the request of the Weld County Health Department, a fugitive dust control plan must be submitted.(Department of Public Health and Environment) U. In accordance with the Regulations of the Colorado Air Quality Control Commission any development that disturbs more than 5 acres of land must incorporate all available and practical methods that are technologically feasible and economically reasonable in order to minimize dust emissions. (Department of Public Health and Environment) V. If land development creates more than a 25-acre contiguous disturbance,or exceeds 6 months in duration, the responsible party shall prepare a fugitive dust control plan, submit an air pollution emissions notice, and apply for a permit from the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment. (Department of Public Health and Environment)(Department of Public Health and Environment) W. A separate building permit shall be obtained prior to the construction of any building.(Department of Building Inspection) X. A plan review is required for each building for which a building permit is required. Plans shall include a floor plan. Commercial building plans shall bear the wet stamp of a Colorado registered architect or engineer. Two complete sets of plans are required when applying for each permit. Commercial building plans require a Code Analysis Data sheet, provided by the Weld County Building Department. Residential building plans may be required to bear the wet stamp of a Colorado registered architect or engineer. (Department of Building Inspection) Y. Buildings shall conform to the requirements of the codes adopted by Weld County at the time of permit application. Current adopted codes include the 2003 International Residential Code;2003 International Building Code; 2003 International Mechanical Code; 2003 International Plumbing Code; 2003 International Fuel Gas Code; 2002 National Electrical Code and Chapter 29 of the Weld County Code. (Department of Building Inspection) Z. Each building will require an engineered foundation based on a site-specific geotechnical report or an open hole inspection performed by a Colorado registered engineer. Engineered foundations shall be designed by a Colorado registered engineer. (Department of Building Inspection) AA. Fire resistance of walls and openings, construction requirements, maximum building height and allowable areas will be reviewed at the plan review. Setback and offset distances shall be determined by the Chapter 23 of the Weld County Code. (Department of Building Inspection) BB. Building height shall be measured in accordance with the 2003 International Building Code for the purpose of determining the maximum building size and height for various uses and types of construction and to determine compliance with the Bulk Requirements as indicated on this plat or delineated in Chapter 23 of the Weld County Code. Building height shall be measured in accordance with Chapter 23 of the Weld County Code in order to determine compliance with offset and setback requirements. When measuring buildings to determine offset and setback requirements,buildings are measured to the farthest projection from the building. Property lines shall be clearly identified and all property pins shall be staked prior to the first site inspection. (Department of Building Inspection) CC. Building plans shall be submitted to Mountain View Fire Protection District for their approval. (Department of Building Inspection) DD. Effective January 1,2003, Building Permits issued on the proposed lots will be required to adhere to the fee structure of the County Road Impact Program. (Ordinance 2002-11) (Department of Planning Services) EE. Effective August 1,2005, Building Permits issued on the subject site will be required to adhere to the fee structure of the Capital Expansion Impact Fee and the Stormwater/Drainage Impact Fee. (Ordinance 2002-11) (Department of Planning Services) FF. Oil and gas structures shall be fenced to avoid tampering. (Sheriff's Office) GG. Except where noted on this plat, signs shall adhere to Section 23-4-80 and Section 23-4-110 of the Weld County Code. These requirements shall apply to all temporary and permanent signs. (Department of Planning Services) HH. Installation of utilities shall comply with Section 24-9-10 of the Weld County Code.(Department of Planning Services) II. The property owner shall be responsible for compiling with the Performance Standards of Chapter 27, Article II and Article VIII, of the Weld County Code. (Department of Planning Services) JJ. Weld County personnel shall be granted access onto the property at any reasonable time in order to ensure the activities carried out on the property comply with the Development Standards stated herein and all applicable Weld County Regulations. (Department of Planning Services) KK. The site shall maintain compliance at all times with the requirements of the Weld County Departments of Public Works, Public Health and the Environment, and Planning Services, and adopted Weld County Code and Policies. (Department of Planning Services) LL. No development activity shall commence on the property,nor shall any building permits be issued on the property until the final plan has been approved and recorded. (Department of Planning Services) MM. The applicant shall comply with Section 27-8-50 Weld County Code,as follows: Failure to submit a Planned Unit Development Final Plan - If a PUD Final Plan application is not submitted within three (3) years of the date of the approval of the PUD Zone District, the Board of County Commissioners shall require the landowner to appear before it and present evidence substantiating that the PUD project has not been abandoned and that the applicant possesses the willingness and ability to continue with the submission of the PUD Final Plan. The Board may extend the date for the submission of the PUD Final Plan application and shall annually require the applicant to demonstrate that the PUD has not been abandoned. If the Board determines that conditions or statements made supporting the original approval of the PUD Zone District have changed or that the landowner cannot implement the PUD Final Plan, the Board of County Commissioners may, at a public hearing revoke the PUD Zone District and order the recorded PUD Zone District reverted to the original Zone District. (Department of Planning Services) NN. The PUD Final Plan shall comply with all regulations and requirements of Chapter 27 of the Weld County Code. (Department of Planning Services) 4. The Change of Zone plat map shall be submitted to the Department of Planning Services'for recording within thirty(30)days of approval by the Board of County Commissioners.With the Change of Zone plat map, the applicant shall submit a digital file of all drawings associated with the Change of Zone application. Acceptable CAD formats are .dwg, .dxf,and .dgn (Microstation); acceptable GIS formats are .shp (Shape Files),Arclnfo Coverages and Arclnfo Export files format type is .e00. The preferred format for Images is .tif(Group 4) ... (Group 6 is not acceptable). (Department of Planning Services) 5. In accordance with Weld County Code Ordinance 2005-7 approved June 1,2005,should the plat not be recorded within the required thirty (30) days from the date of the Board of County Commissioners resolution a $50.00 recording continuance charge shall be added for each additional 3 month period. (Department of Planning Services) On behalf of the applicant, I would like to thank the County for consideration of this project. Please do not hesitate to contact me with any questions you may have. Sincerely, Joshua L. Rowland Director of Planning and Design, Land Architects Exhibit — A ad S±O2±iHO21v ONV1 BP7:Rn 9n vL adv LSC TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS, INC. 1889 York Street Denver,CO 80206 (303)333-1105 FAX(303)333-1107 E-mail: Ise@]scdenver.c om Web Site: hltp://www.lsedenver.com TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS, April 13, 2006 Mr. Michael Miro Longs Peak Investors, LW 7120 E. Orchard Road, Suite 450 Englewood, CO 80111 Re: Kiteley Ranch at Foster Lake Weld County, CO (LSC #050380) Dear Mr. Miro: At your request,we evaluated the phasing plan for the proposed Kiteley Ranch at Foster Lake residential development to be located southeast of the intersection of State Highway (SH) 66 and Weld County Road (WCR) 7 in Weld County, CO. The proposed phasing plan and improvements associated with each phase are shown in the enclosed figure and are summarized in Table A. As shown, the development will be constructed in three phases. Phase 1 includes the northwest corner of the site and is the portion closest to the SH 66/WCR 7 intersection. The northern site access point will also be constructed as part of Phase 1. Phase 2 will include the southern half of the site as well as the southern site access point. Finally, the third and final phase will include the remainder of the site which lies in the northeast corner of the site. As recommended in the Kiteley Ranch at Poster Lake Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) performed by LSC in March 2006, the two site access points will require separate southbound left-turn lanes. Based on the phasing plan, it is recommended that those auxiliary lanes be constructed in conjunction with the construction of each access points. As a result,it is recommended that the southbound left- turn lane at the north site access be completed prior to the buildout of Phase 1 while the southbound left-turn lane at the south site access should be constructed prior to buildout of Phase 2. In addition, the regional off-site improvements that are recommended at the SH 66/WCR 7 intersection prior to buildout of the surrounding areas should be constructed when they are deemed necessary by the Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT) and Weld County. Year 2010 turn-lane recommendations for this intersection are shown in Table B. Our best estimate for the timing of these improvements is that they would be necessary prior to buildout of Phase 2. Prior to buildout of Phase 3, contributions to the widening of WCR 7 adjacent to the site should be made. The share of the improvement costs that the Kiteley Ranch at Foster --- Lake development is required to contribute for the SH 66/WCR 7 intersection improvements E d SlOHlJHDHH aMd-1 e9Z 60 90 bl adV Mr. Michael Miro Page 2 April 13, 2OO6 and WCR 7 widening should be agreed upon based on discussions with Weld County and the surrounding developments. It should be noted that a cost sharing agreement was previously agreed upon with the developers of the Liberty Ranch and Alder Estates sites. We trust that our findings and recommendations will assist in the planning for the proposed Kiteley Ranch at Foster Lake development. Please call us if we can be of further assistance. Respectfully submitted, ORE LSC Transportation Cons tents, In-', � '�y 85827� - 7/. �/$yBenja*rS:n T. Waldman, RE., PTOE Enclosure: Figure Tables A and B BTW/BP/wc 0:\LSC\Projects\2005\050380\Report\L2-Response to Comments.wpd r-. bd S±O2±IHO?JV ONV1 e9Z60 90 PL .idy zL 1 u -\ V C 4-71) -I- I II \\\-\\-I rnw/aoe1 II I 6 CO i; •• j� I 1 N..,wo„� i1 U i Na. N. N. CO_ ` / 1 "w ) le i ..."-.. issi1 all I MC SC ZIT1alWit 1i di. I I P lkwa �;. �> I I i 'S w ` I 9 co.iuo,�u £ S, 1 — �� N NI ` (el moo o.aa' - 1 i I II I L,_"_" _ ._ ut b C c 4 OO a r yy U a 2 ' '& E q i y c .� B B S E Y -0 J z- s 9.d S±O31IHO'HV ONV1 863:60 90 H. AV t ( k I f m Ca % ( CO ] C a }O co g co C \ as I } / ! Vs en co 11 12 HI g C Do \ — 0o k NC CU C a 0 S \ 7 \ \ as roj \\ \ 2 co f i ( ) 7 / \ \ . we eari CL 8 II ID C. ) � § f ® � a k ! # J E \ E EIC + k ( aj -t k \ fl § : ) 7 3 a E ) ) kk f � k Q 2O ; t ) I a = 2w # ! § / t E ) CO0 0 C - o XI 0 ) • in . \ ( 4 % . @ ) k E ( \ k ` 0-I 0 © gasemv :NV1 e« 90 w A Table B SH 661WCR 7 Improvement Summary Kitely Ranch at Foster Lake Weld County, Colorado (LSC # 050380; April, 2006) Total Length Taper Length Improvement tfeet) (feet) Eastbound Approach - Left-Turn Deceleration Lane 840 300 -Right-Turn Deceleration Lane 700 300 Westbound Approach - Left-Turn Deceleration Lane 1,170 300 Northbound Approach - Left-Turn Deceleration Lane 530 120 - Right-Turn Deceleration Lane 520 120 Right-Turn Acceleration Lane 1,170 300 Southbound Approach - Left-Turn Deceleration Lane 430 120 - Right-Turn Deceleration Lane 300 120 - Right-Turn Acceleration Lane 1,170 30D Notes: Based on criteria outlined In the Colorado Department of Transportation State Highway Access Code. Assumes a R-A classification on SH 66 with a 60 mph posted speed limit and a NR-C classification on WCR 7 with a 35 mph speed limit. d S1OB±IHO V 0NV1 e6Z:60 90 4l AV Exhibit — C Bd S1O311HDHV ❑NV1 efi7:sn qn VL adH FROM FPX NO. :9705354347 Apr. 12 2006 02:39PM PS 1111 THE HIGHLAND DITCH COMPANY P. O. Bus 649,Mead CO noso-0649 970.535.4531-e-mail April 3!,20116 To Whom It May Concern: RE: Weld County Department of Planning Services/Referral Case Number PZ—1082 Kiteley Farms LLLP—Kiteley Ranch at Foster Lake For Change of Zone Application Parcel Number 1207 27 000047 The Highland Ditch Company understands the conditions presented to us and agree to work with the applicant on these issues. Sincerely, ..S i,.-y4 Robert Schlegel President 6d S1O211HO21V ONV1 e67,:60 90 bL add Exhibit - D �� d S1o311HOth' ONV1 e0C:60 90 bl add AGENDA LAND r ARCHITECTS •••• • pvapRive t balm Date/Time: 4/10/2006— 12:30 PM Project: Kiteley Ranch at Foster Reservoir Project#: LA-044088 Location: The Highland Ditch Company Attendees: The Highland Ditch Company Board of Directors Josh Rowland/Land Architects • Mike Miro/Longs Peak Investors, LLC Discussion Items: ❖ Drainage Easement for detention flows into Foster Reservoir ▪ Correction of erosion problems ❖ Safety concerns along the ditch a. County requests a fence along the ditch bank (open rail with wire mesh) b. Shared maintenance road/recreation trail easement • Acceptance of proposed easements (main ditch and lateral to Anderson Property) ❖ Statement of future use of the Highland Ditch and Foster Reservoir • Ditch Crossing Improvements (Hwy 66 and Mead Crossing connection) Letter of approval to Weld County prior to the April 18, Planning Commission hearing land planning • whim design • landscape architecture - park planning 9137 S. nidgeline Blvd. #130, Richlands Ranch, CO 80129 wivw.lendarchitects no phone (303) 734.'777 • lax (303) 734.171&•LL d S13311HO?JV 0NV1 eoe60 90 17L .idy April 10, 2006 Dave Bachman, Manager The Highland Ditch Company RE: P2-1082— Kiteley Ranch at Foster Lake PUD (Zone Change) Resolution to safety concerns raised by Weld County Public Works Staff We are providing you with the following conditions to be presented to the Highland Ditch Company Board of Directors for review and acceptance at the April 10, 2006 board meeting. Weld County Public Works has requested that Longs Peak Investors, LLC, applicant for the Kiteley Ranch at Foster Lake PUD, provide resolution to safety concerns related to the maintenance and ongoing operation of the Highland Ditch where it is.adjacent with residential development proposed in the PUD. Based on our previous discussions regarding these issues, and your approval of PZ-1082 Kiteley Ranch PUD Change of Zone Rat dated March 7 2006, we understand the following conditions to be acceptable to the Highland Ditch Company and request a letter of approval from the Board once these conditions are agreed to. We have provided an updated version of the Change of Zone Plat for your review of these conditions: 1. The County has requested that a drainage easement be obtained from Highland Ditch for the drainage from Kiteley Ranch that is discharged into Foster Reservoir. Response: Longs Peak Investors, LLC, requests that the Highland Ditch Company Board of Directors agree to provide an easement for the release of flows, at historic rates, into Foster Reservoir from the Kiteley Ranch PUD storm drain system. 2. The County has requested that the existing erosion problems on Highland Ditch be corrected. Response: Longs Peak Investors, LLC, understands that long term maintenance of erosion in the ditch is the responsibility of the Highland Ditch Company. It is anticipated that the county may request improvements to the ditch to ensure the safety of residents in the Kiteley Ranch PUD. Longs Peak Investors, LLC, is agreeable to participating in the improvements with the ditch company. We request the Highland Ditch Company Board of Directors agree to participate with Longs Peak Investors, LLC, to address potential erosion problems along portions of the ditch that are adjacent to the Kiteley Ranch PUD. 3. The County is requesting that off-site flow in Highland.Ditch be analyzed. Response: Longs Peak Investors, LLC, requests that the Highland Ditch Company Board of Directors agree to provide flow rate information for the analysis of the following information: operational flows and additional flows received from storm water runoff from adjacent properties (i.e., SH 66), additional runoff in the future for the ditch. 4. The County has asked that safety concerns along Highland Ditch be addressed. The intent is that the ditch access road also be a recreational trail for Kiteley Ranch and an open rail removable fence be located along the top of the ditch. P:12004104088-EJ-Kitely FannM4dmin Project fnfolCorrespondenceVHighland Ditch 4-10-06.doc Z1 d S±OSlIHD2IV ONH1 e0£:60 90 4L !db Response: Longs Peak Investors, LLC, requests that the Highland Ditch Board of Directors allow the fence as requested by the County to ensure the safety of the residents of Kiteley Ranch. Refer to the Change of Zone Plat for drawings explaining the relationship of the Highland Ditch to the fence and road/trail. The easement provided on the Change of Zone Plat allows for joint use of the 15' wide gravel access road. 5. The County has asked that the Highland Ditch Company represent their plans for the future use and location for the Highland Ditch and Foster Resrvoir.. Response: Longs Peak Investors, LLC understands the Highland Ditch company intends to keep the ditch and Foster Reservoir under operation as a major component of a regional raw water system and does not intend to change the location or condition of the ditch as it is today along the Kiteley property. 6. The County has asked that the Highalnd Ditch Company recognize that improvements to the ditch crossing at Hwy 66 may be necessary to allow for intersection improvements and be cooperative in the coordination of said improvements to ditch crossings at the intersection of Hwy 66 and CR 7. The County has also requested that the Applicant provide access to the Mead Crossing development, we request that the Highland Ditch Board of Directors provide their position on a new ditch crossing to the east. Response: Longs Peak Investors, LLC intends to work with the County as necessary to determine ultimate improvements at the intersection of Hwy 66 and CR 7 and requests the Highland Ditch Company cooperate with our efforts to satisfy county concerns. We request the Highland Ditch Company provide a statement of their position concerning adding a new ditch crossing of the east into Mead Crossing. Response: Longs Peak Investors, LLC requests that, if amenable to all conditions stated herein, the Highland Ditch company Board of Directors provide a signature in the signature block below. We intend to submit this letter as evidence to Weld County that their concerns have been addressed adequately. Print name: Signature: Date Duly Authorized Representative of the Highland Ditch Company Please contact me if you have any questions regarding this letter or the exhibits that are provided as attachments to this letter. Thank you for the consideration of this project and assistance in moving forward through the approval process. Sin rel , Joshua L. R la d. R.L.A. Director of Planning and Design Land Architects P:12004t04088-E✓-Kitely FarmstAdmin Project/nfolCorrespondencewighland Ditch 4-10-06.doc•£ d S1031IHO2dv 0NV- en£:6n 911 bL idv Exhibit — E 17;d S±O311HOav' ONVT e0c::Rn 4n nL idv • Weld County Planning Department GREELEY OFFICE SEP 2 7 2005 • RECEIVED September 20, 2005 Kim Ogle JR ENGINEERING Planning Manager '•'' aa=e Weld County—Department of Planning Services 1555 N. I7th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Re: Kiteley Ranch at Foster Lake, Weld County;Colorado Dear Mr. Ogle: • • J R Engineering, acting as the town engineers for the Town of Mead, is in receipt of a conceptual site plan provided to us by Michael Miro of S. A. Miro, Inc. for the above- mentioned project. We have been requested to provide you with a letter of support of their proposed access onto Weld County Road 7. We have reviewed the site plan and find that the access points onto WCR 7 are in compliance with our current status of this roadway (Major Collector). The Town of Mead is in the process of developing a Transportation Plan with the assistance of Felsburg Holt and Ullevig. The plan is not finished yet, and therefore we do not know if they will recommend changing the current status of WCR 7 based on the current land uses approved or planned for this area. Therefore we reserve the right to revisit design standards if a different road classification for WCR 7 is made in our Transportation Plan_ As the County is aware, the Town of Mead has expressed concerns as to how and to what extent WCR 7 south of State Highway 66 will be used due to amount of density being planned within the area adjacent to the WCR 7. We would support Weld.County efforts to require developments pursuing a Weld County process to consider all possible means of distributing traffic through other mad networks to alleviate congestion at the intersection of WCR 7 and State Highway 66. If you should have any questions, please contact me at 970-491-9888. Thank you for this opportunity to provide comments o. this project. Sincerely, 7 /Mite a ake, P . PLS Director of Operations Cc: Michael Friesen, Town Manager 2620 East Fmspet.Road,Suite 190,Fors Collins.CO 80525 970.491-9888'Fast 970-491-9984-www.)reoginRing.com 9L d S1o311Ho?JV 0NV1 eLE:60 90 tL !dV Exhibit G 9ld S1031IH0NV 0NV1 el£60 90 bl !dV 04/12/2006 11:38 FAX 3037885414 ®002/002 April 10, 2006 Grant & Grant, LLP James E. Anderson 3528 County Road 28 Longmont, CO 80504 RE: PZ-7082—Kiteley Ranch at Foster Lake PLO (Zone Change) Resolution to relocation of ditch lateral and future easement Dear James, Longs Peak Investors, LLC, based on previous conversations with you regarding the matter, requests that you provide your signature as authorization that you are amenable to having the exisintg ditch lateral, located on the Kiteley Property, relocated in an easement along the proposed County Road 7 ROW in order to continue service to your properly at no cost to you. vest) A,v�-c{5or✓ �C (t(\7 tr. y_ io —1)b Print name: re: Date James E. Anderson Grant& Grant LLP Thank you for the consideration of this project and assistance in moving forward through the approval process, Sinc rely Jos ua L. R , R.L.A. Director of Planning and Design Land Architects P.12000104088-E✓-Keely Formst4dminPro bet lnlolCorre/ spontlsncoUim Anderson 070-o8.doc LL'd S1O311HO2IV 0NVT el£60 90 bl !dV ..r a.s�..x . i,}RR SN ld 1N3W3AO2idWl 311S AHVNIWIl321d W I I I !I I" 11) g;,^,,��,"„�,.,,,,,,., i ali I 3NOZ 30 BONVHO'a and A3X X3GNI suanirm'emlm $ hill Z906-Zd - 3NV1 H31SOd 1 t 11 g IRRHS O 1`dHONV lA3131IN - 1 III ®E i t b z u w II NM Lil { 1 ! ; w E f lac 003 I 4,1 W v a h6 5 CC 41- W ll- zlal O H 2 at Q W CC Q. O _ II t� 12 1i ll CL. a l & 1 Q I . a Iva J.fi,,.:.. '� y "' �\ �. - —_ '�' ... ....�, a xw = �I , 1 ≤ 8s o it ' \ . CA in �f� , I • = v I! Ir 1�' , 'yam , I . ! 11•..I Jo * •- ,,t,2 `1 3 I 6 , .y'' ,.•` • • t , Dim 2 Ii , / ar LY J ' k • 'y 1 „r Ea W ��I I I d � /// : - ../ / y:. L++ n I �E T' I �_�� -,>1 y . , ti 1l 1 , p� [ p *II a pt 7 >'y k „K --- ti• ;_ " r 7i I , a--1. 'b ♦ / /,�T J R r/ 1� V t • @ �YI ! '' . I F � .f { ;i _- l g �Ilfl I'I I , S fa 1 C , p{ PI PI I Ii. fi Lei 9 , e$ I: - S iW; '1.-i;: `i,, �il 1712 Z in `i r. SNV1d IN3W3A02idWI 31IS ANVNIINI138d In I I.I'eV In . ...•........-e I �s�11 3NOZ�O 3ONVH0'O'fl'd i LL ciaiiamilia n a r Z80L-Zd - 3NV12131SOd 1 I, s, NV1d311S O I $ "g 1V HONVeI A31311N i� ill N ft I • FA II li p bpi _it,_ —;... __ If I • C II-0-0-4_o0.. -p n n Cif 0-0-.010 °_ m I. O _ iu • • • •Y � • O O O o i W d � � N a ! ,E}n e i m ° 1-,., $ Lu g c-a a , 1ru e e_e e a 0.D 3J g p A i • • o r r • ye i o�e r ! eL i h:L.c; a3 ui 1 tE! tte I I �s _a l! p_ e �e s e e • a I, i o o •''Cr-Cr � ! • e_ e_} • . • . e � • a ' / A I , I 0-fl0 0,o • v q o a n • / @@ r • / i pp / bb 1 It J / i ,l f €3 nem I l , if ti3III II illy ill' €3 6 i _ O-Q 0-0- y d il; Ill Ili;Eli 5513 I .1 . Bb! ' ! i a A.2 3 q 0 1 m ! ! HtI I § Om ® E 00p 5 SN'd1d IN3IN3A021dWl 311$A21VNIWll321d �� 35 In '^ 7aiiu +QQNiV1 6�? ' Z806-Zd - 3NV132J31SOd �� I .� NV 1d 311$ I O lV HONV8 A31311)1 ,I , IIII g co Fl 1 i ! .: .9 III 3 �li`II �a I a „ I , 3 I EP g l i i l i Iii loi fa,' ., \ V 6 . 5It a g '`yd $ i 1 I ' '. Us A \tea �. S aF t iid I 1 .i.slitil t "` }' g s, 9 g m $g 11 =- 3 el o t ` .� 1 _ II-� C� _ at III �., 's; ©g '9 a3 Se Ie h. 8 : a �� 1!E g,s„ t s ♦ 1-i it ! x.[...t• l a q§, i'1 ,_ ape g `a1 LI r! I w Ei � 3 ; { 'M li - o -moo- ii �: I Igo _0 W w / ate. Li g I` R I t �` it 1i gf, gIV / '� la€ a j1 �c _ m ! II �`y/��. / 3 .• ten- t 4./y ° , 'Y' 7"cl I 0 O 0 O OF . • a�.:saaavp= >I / O� . _ge_ _11 I Ne • � C lii$ 4 . Igit • ---- °! .i .� - -- •iI�• a j�It• // e ice. _CE I .' o • u e •_% �• III! W-a 'I • .nts'. � 11 /° e E €�a Asa '9f I I ` I I• — r L, , • o e:o e +r o • o`er e • � •;o e 1 I 1k F2 a� n ' n. i _. !I. 5 r. SNVld IN3W3AOlidW1 311S AdVNIWI132Jd € � I ONVHO 0110 IV In SIJIMORV@QNV'I a In 1 Z80I.-Zd 3NH1g 1 3NOZ AO 3d31SOd i .6I1++3Y+3 3 4 O $ 'I IV H3NV I A3131IN l ill Mild aLIS R i 9. m o. : I Ili. mli ill III 14 .1i . gg i v z ciV! lli!! ;I Iii!ill ill! 1 in, ii ill 8W I Rix ., W 'J' §1 I1 1P. N$ El i �. .. �� -� 3 I i 5 A 3 i W a _ I I I iii li a. O ® f Uhl - T) \I / ... :._ 6 J l I I \\_ . I -- —o / /" VIII LIAR. ; '\ \ � % : AN R f�A ri WI zt, / \ i III 111 (� i Cam:. ft `��\ I: I il W ' per ® / 3i „tp r —Id •. . It -1-- _ ;s 4' g \ Si 3 ' iINII £ W 16IQ usim ggg E _ 44UUYY W / � \<' •1 e SNNfld 1NRIN3AOLIdVII 3113 ALIVNIWI13ild I ILLS. in w"°.........:�; 1�"..�.:.,s'on , I ;till 3NOZ30a$NVHO'0'fl'd g E ILL y�QL.LVl ! ;till 3801.-Zd - 3NV12i3lSOd i s,g 1N31Y3J21tl1N3 g i Iamb IV HONV2I A3131I>i II Iii Nnd3LS 3 Lo k\"\\\\,,,,\\*\,\\, III 1[2 III 1 II / eel i I : ), iii I g it i, ii;#i; iiiilk II II gg I\ �'5f Sif tli1 I: 1 g , , (4 i ,__,,,i ,,_ EAC \ I u e I j „ I IN 4 ii �+ it !� ( 1. 1L E§ i th t It 1 opeJola3'Nub PIeM l `I i I i i «,.�4..��:......•.�,..r,.» - J llE laid auoz jo°We4°'mid I I 133HS I LL ,..my'i' a v1 11111 Z80I•-Zd - 3Nb1 ?�31SOd I H3no0 i O " € IV HONV I A3131IN 1 III Ili 6 na R bIII r v Z i istx plk. . i;ll OP a i 1a4 ilrb: s2-fr -y i-9 bs 1 I a ' )bi llt ill g xiil li °Iltfib lilt lilt *M k A .\� IIII-1 1 I ill oo i IRI4 $Ill* 1 , I 1 - 11iI!ill IY ll 1 IlIRI • "!)11 :r_L_i_ , slii'i� ' Rfli s �x8asbi8t �ii� t �q V „mil i-iVI i e hail-046i)ii slIst it LII)JL I ( 4 i ati ¢¢ riA. it!itf 11'416 11 li lvitSVtli i i , I i ii hill iiil 611! I i it g t i ii Cis Gs a ma H �- R it ii i 14 i lli, i elIk" i aa i16i`b' R$ NI: A ! Ii cI 1 i � 1, rb ii ttbCg I1 is � NW. riNU Lu I 11 01 liti 'tiIN il 11 i 1 i il gi loi 1,irll iliqii li 3 H ii i9 t 10 r"E it !I "� li 4_ it l ;t! 'n° ll tl' ti!a. r9 Rea Re r 5b a 3 i t i al `lii!s i£ °•i 4 ib x` s a i Ib 8 ai r -gRfI�[® ca c' .'Ei' tiig r�#g� li Iti 3tt it ig i ID Iii ' It :ft t4fili tae #22i =-IR p Z 1 gill a a A b t . a a - a Y a ICC at DP: = r } b s � i � s ! 9b 4. R !VI 4 �• $ s ir. R 1 I i °A o ii flail ' i 12 19 i V O O fii a, slim[ 1 8 i ! I r P bit Iii I i i 3 4■ in; E b e iR Ie ' R ib P BQ i "R lilt riI a g It I 41 V � X21-1 b !Ili . t i 6 li 131 a=bs i 1 4 sit i e �I .Z I ii i til I !Il i I E ,ill 1 i i i. i IN!N! i Ili i t I i2 Ii1t 8 6 ICE d i1 �� zi 1 a ? i =1s = I I £ ¢ ¢ ilir t1 ; s to cg W iL `i11 Ong i2= y1 i f I 5Y 1. i I is=bt ' t. a �i Y 1 id: lfplI IF I!i !Nip p i r s s i IA ill a } 6 Al IF I R i O l p leg e R. 5 p i. o i i Y r co W li li l E � ,�� 's3 g a :i l• l It iv11 Iv 'Ali es l•aa i_u Elm F, MIN 1 i I i i ; is it itb IIn _ i I . i yQ b`glirlg - iJNg11.iII iiiib� il' iP'llIIiiIl € 1iiII4 E & ° ° Q � i 1� �btiia ife 'It4 a. 6illi '2gi iIstt . vriIti .3Y Iatis4 is . $a ; i. # ; .Itla. mPI6 W . . . . e . . - . - - - • ii IIII P 8 �+ �� pIlIt'llIIIIIIif a II � G 'it il 79 p 3 ii age ,ji k=#111 i 1-fire }} ` tffs$ RiI ea% Iti1gli+€4 i a1 fji INtliilll i In* sal 1 ii;a9a'�I _ t Jlea $I Ij•1� Y Pi 1f 4 - 1�b�iii 1 of Hi 3 • III tll= Y I ii �Piiiii �.ra it e 1 Pi r i I s ! E !VIII R hi iiiiihiniliiiii 4 if [ [ tfEf �! ji�� `b � i ir � � i ! , d d t��E � i1 #I it a , : I) id I I ) I Ii I ii E 'IA opejop0`launo0 PPM s I j CO } Mid 8U0 40 a6Ut L 'Q'fl'd I:a I f 1 1± ma.r•muar avwaw•awtaa„aw ��, 4§ i'orld LL wr."'''...'"..W r t rwr�I rtr.w 1 tr�tt� � @r � i $i7�.iIHJ2Pr+P,lQt1V[ b 4 ' 2801•-Zd - 3)IH-1 2�a1SOd •;t 0 ONINoz3a O ` IV HONVH A3131IN i I So' cv lC 1 # I : 3 f` ._ _ H_— Ili Ili a1! 11 ' P $ ii 11 a:3 it I 1 ii! ! i ill !ii !i a �1�i _ pp — el }I3 ¢� lei II iiit v .�� =— J If ut ia_ bei. riii nil `5 ; • 1 I iUIiiII alls1,1lmlii !! t ' ht ill' Ill = t 005 i O 0 O ' I 13 2 -t I s ill il ii g M r s si : �,: t iPhnOr Mr m �� a , 1 iii!.... i G -'- iii,.,. -— -- \ aw i... L . . ;. . v. I;t • - , eta _ ` ii,:,z . , [ I + ,� I. s . a. iii'f - 0::1 Ni.,,,.. !' 2�1;! f ,`•:w t it ' II' t "[Ii .u. II, . , . ,,,, --s. , .., --, N 01 WO i. ‘ r...1.1tt:C.:. . . i i _ •.;,, iri; t: ' t7.42._;.. ;....?D‘ ..__:.--!,X: .. '1'. ....----- pits-- . .-.--: .•!„:7C-i,,1. i •.. II--f— II '� r= sir y,.anr ...ii....''/...../- , il E s - t !I 1. '' ..,1:: 7:-FT;•••• .. .".,'`Q% ' i,,k -;....".',...-.. -. i .77.r. ....-:- .. ; i'.--$ ;t II ,.>> i 11. I : • (1'7- 7.7`4-/)'<.:?. --',- .-A?z, . .-.. . . . .,:-.-: ! •. •. i'fal',-ii ,,,izi -I.% r, -;'1.: , , o: - �c.�• _ iii -]. ., ' 1^ $- ICE,p .._ __ oafs I 15i} i _§ �,.,> f 11111 8 'Ai tI m II I opejolao'µuno°pleM 1yg M ====-.4711-61- .,.....+'� , 4 §,} lied euoZ;o GBue4°'Grid N 1i@ i i I I4i9 SlIVl34 LL crrom....witl'I I Z806-Zd - 3�IH-I 2�31SOd I I,Y� SNoiO3S i O lid HONH2I A3131IN 11 .ill AVMavo8 co ii I , t II4i 1 ' 3 i' S CI *₹ ° 3� I i � ' I lii 11 3 rj CM _� 1411 114 iii g I �,,� Ti i vii I m F €iF ; s g Ij : I` I CO 8 4i ' 5g I yi W .9{{ QQ¢€I B F « 8 W g E cc D S t8 a- ( bit • � I WiIth 11 iv di I 1 -I 1 2i LL� t 111111 _ i=§ 3 W` mh1 @fit h i— Oey -- F Oc sapp y : OWO`� W a if 91 & :." 2 a L j T . i I 3 L \ ws C i Y ii , cm W a i } I 3 .i T IS; 3 vi 3 x eF 1 - s „ -. g m, 1: - e.....vvvvv� E a •is. / Y� i I✓ p Q 118IHX3 AVMGVOH �M-=,•;.,:tiz ,• .� s •.!, 3NOZ A0 3JNdHO .and s w iw� •.•rn wr •w•u..i Y Vol E siDa.raxaUVQaNV1 g a 1= Z801.-Zd - 3NV1 2J21SOd • H N 1`d HONV A919l1N � ill I i$ I I I ' I � r i j I I i-ll 1 8 o 0 I I 96 /: I it 1 II Lit ld1 • 1�-= o l-4" I 0 o I II` 8 1,�I r k a ,,.,,, 1 • I =l I' mi .4, col I 1 I ml ,USE i t3, col ;w yl &� WI z I I _ I I iii, 1 I II , I 7 I 1 I s IQ It Fa a5 R RRg Ut t 38 RR R -a" 1a2 2 $I a aeffiu1 a -s 4'11 11241 1I ,0 Fula° 99 9 9!9 !99 L €g iiiI 1x2 dl 2 � I-s g all n gik@3 gl ° Se 3S Sad see 1 il� i 4+ i Memorandum TO: Sheri Lockman, W.C. Planning DATE: April 18, 2006 C FROM: Pam Smith, W.C. Department of Publi COLORADO Health and Environment CASE NO.: PZ-1082 NAME: Kitely Farms The Weld County Health Department has reviewed this proposal for 427 single family residences with active and passive recreational uses. When the Change of Zone comments were written the applicant had agreed to provide restroom facilities in the pool/tot lot park and the 1.42 acre part in the north entrance park. As of Friday, April 14, 2006 the Department learned that the applicant has changed their mind. There is also no restroom facility noted in the north entrance park on the Correct Site Plan, sheet 4. Therefore the Department requests that Change of Zone plat note #Q be amended to read: 1. Permanent restroom and handwashing facilities shall be provided within the pooll/tot lot park and the 1.42 acre park in the north entrance. During an inspection of the property on April 17, 2006 the Department found two residences on the property (a correction of the addresses from the original Change of Zone comments). Residences at 13844 and 13812 have undocumented septic systems. In a conversation with the applicant the Department learned that these houses will be connected to St. Vrain sewer during the Phase II development. This phase will be started in approximately 3-4 years. Therefore, both undocumented septic system that will remain in use must be permitted and evaluated for adequacy. Please add condition 6M, page 14 under At time of Final Plan submission M All septic systems located on the property shall have appropriate permits from the Weld County Department of Public Health & Environment. The Environmental Health Division of the Weld County Department of Public Health & Environment was unable to locate a septic permit for 13844 CR 7. Any existing septic system(s)which is not currently permitted through the Weld County Department of Public Health & Environment will require an I.S.D.S. Evaluation prior to the issuance of the required septic permit(s). In the event the system(s) is found to be inadequate, the system(s) must be brought into compliance with current I.S.D.S. regulations. O:\PAM\PLANNING\CHZONE\PZ-1082 KITELY FARMS ADDITIONS.RTF EXHIBIT MEMORANDUM - If& TO: Sheri Lockman, Dept. of Planning Services DATE: April 14, 2006 VIireeTh CFROM: Drew Scheltinga, P.E., Public Works Department . 'p O � SUBJECT: PZ-1082 Kiteley Ranch at Foster Lake PUD (Zone Change) COLORADO During my preparation for the Planning Commission hearing scheduled for April 18, 20006, I reviewed the preliminary geotechnical report by Ground Engineering Consultants, dated November 22, 2004, and the recommendations of the Colorado Geological Survey, dated January 4, 2005. The groundwater and soil problems that have been identified can be mitigated; however, additional engineering investigations and recommendations will be required. I recommend the following additional condition of approval be added to the Planning Commission Resolution; the final plat application materials shall include a detailed final engineering geology/geotechnical report that addresses the limitations of construction due to groundwater and soil conditions identified in the Subsurface Exploration Program Preliminary Geotechnical Recommendations repot by Ground Engineering Consultants, dated November 22, 2004. PC: PZ-1082 Kiteley Ranch at Foster Lake PUD (Zone Change) Email & Original: Sheri Lockman, Dept. Planning Services Email: Joshua Rowland, Land Architects Email and PC by Post: Jerry Eckelberger, Longs Peak Investors, LLC, Applicant EXHIBIT Page 1 of 1 nZ - /O$2. M.\PLANNING—DEVELOPMENT REVIEW\2{hange of Zone(Z,CZ,PZ,MZ,AMPZ)PZ-1082 Kiteley Ranch\PZ-1082 Kiteley Ranch at Foster Lake(Zone Change)04 14 06.doe Hello