HomeMy WebLinkAbout20062549 Page 1 of 1
Esther Gesick
From: Myrna Folsom [myrna_f2000@yahoo.com]
Sent: Monday, September 04, 2006 7:21 AM
To: Esther Gesick
Subject: parallel arterial
To: Weld County Board of County Commissioners
Dear Commissioners. FYI copy of communication to Mike Simone. John Folsom
Mike: The Weld Commissioners and Frank Hempen are at it again. The county has so far proposed the
east of I-25 parallel arterial along 9-1/2, 11, 13 and a new road between I-25 and 11 [Felsburg study].
This morning's TC describes extending 9-1/2 south from 66 to St. Vrain Creek and then jogging west to
the east frontage road where it ceases to be a"parallel arterial", dumping the traffic into Del Camino. I
have long proposed extending 9-1/2 south directly across St. Vrain Creek to 9-3/4 to 24 and then
diagonally south by southeast until it meets with 11 south of 22. Creating a 9-1/2 south of 22 has
effectively been blocked by Frederick's annexations making no provision for it. Joining on to the
frontage road just increases traffic congestion at Del Camino and creates more traffic through the
proposed Riverdance [St. Vrain Lakes] development. Since it has been proposed [according to the
article] that Firestone maintain part of the state highway east frontage road, perhaps you might want to
look into all of this. John
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
9/6/2006 2006-2549
Hello