HomeMy WebLinkAbout20062333.tiff Weld County Planning Department
SOUTHWEST BUILDING
Weld County Refe*aF°6
RECEIVED
IJuly 6, 200
�i
COLORADO
The Weld County Department of Planning Services has received the following item for review:
Applicant Don & Linda Owens - Case Number PF-521
Gloraloma Estates
Please Reply By August 4, 2006 Planner Kim Ogle
Project PUD Final Plan for nineteen (19)residential lots with E (Estate) uses, Gloraloma
Estates PUD
Legal Lot B RE-1921; part SE4 Section 9, T2N, R67W of the 6th P.M., Weld County,
Colorado.
Location North of and adjacent to CR 22; west of and adjacent to CR 19.
Parcel Number 1311 09 400065
The application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you
consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Please reply by the above listed date so that we may
give full consideration to your recommendation. Any response not received before or on this date may be
deemed to be a positive response to the Department of Planning Services. If you have any further questions
regarding the application, please call the Planner associated with the request. Please note that new
information may be added to applications under review during the review process. If you desire to
examine or obtain this additional information, please call the Department of Planning Services.
Board of County Commissioners Hearing (if applicable) August 30, 2006
❑ We have reviewed the request and find that it does/does not comply with our Comprehensive Plan
It We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests.
❑ ee attached letter. / �*
��y C-ex\exim ovs\u� Le b ..--1 t rn F, OnNK.VIA ill Ii \1 L �1( o
VLF ^
Signature Date -Q(
Agency •
, r n �pJ? z
"" �-�""' EXHIBIT
2006-2333 1 ./
❖Weld County Planning Dept. +1555 N. 17th Ave.Greeley,CO.80631 +(970)353-6100 ext.3540 +(970)304-6498 fax
• 6 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES
BUILDING INSPECTION
NORTH OFFICE
918 10`"Street
GREELEY, COLORADO 80631
' PHONE (970)353-6100, EXT.3540
FAX (970)304-6498
C. SOUTHWEST OFFICE
4209 CR 24.5
8730
COLORADO PHONE (720)652-4210 ext. 8730
FAX (720)652-4211
July 11, 2006
Don & Linda Owens
PUD Final Plan for(19) residential lots with E (Estates) uses, Gloraloma Estates PUD.
PF-521
1. A separate building permit shall be obtained prior to the construction of any building.
2. A plan review is required for each building for which a building permit is required. Plans shall include a floor
plan. Residential building plans may be required to bear the wet stamp of a Colorado registered architect or
engineer.
3. Buildings shall conform to the requirements of the codes adopted by Weld County at the time of permit
application. Current adopted codes include the 2003 International Residential Code; 2003 International Building
Code; 2003 International Mechanical Code;2003 International Plumbing Code;2003 International Fuel Gas Code;
2005 National Electrical Code and Chapter 29 of the Weld County Code.
4. Each residential building will require an engineered foundation based on a site-specific geotechnical report or
an open hole inspection performed by a Colorado registered engineer. Engineered foundations shall be designed
by a Colorado registered engineer.
5. Fire resistance of walls and openings,construction requirements,maximum building height and allowable areas
will be reviewed at the plan review. Setback and offset distances shall be determined by the Zoning Ordinance.
6. Building height shall be measured in accordance with the 2003 International Building Code for the purpose of
determining the maximum building size and height for various uses and types of construction and to determine
compliance with the Bulk Requirements from Chapter 23 of the Weld County Code. Building height shall be
measured in accordance with Chapter 23 of the Weld County Code in order to determine compliance with offset
and setback requirements. When measuring buildings to determine offset and setback requirements,buildings are
measured to the farthest projection from the building. Property lines shall be clearly identified and all property pins
shall be staked prior to the first site inspection.
7. Building plans shall be submitted to Mountain View Fire Protection District for their approval.
Please contact me for any further information regarding this project.
Sinc ely,
U
oger igil
Building Official
Longmont Conservation District
9595 Nelson Road, Box D- Loncrooni. Colorado 80501—Phone (303) "6-4034-Fax(303) 684-9893
Site Review Memo
To: Longmont CD Board
From: Nancy McIntyre
Subject: (List site name, location, Permit#, Purpose, etc.)
Don & Linda Owens, Gloraloma Estates Subdivision. Case#PF521. Final plat
application for 19 lots on 105.7 acres.
Prime Farmland:
N/A
Water Quality:
N/A
Noxious Weed Control:
We would suggest that the developer work with the Weld County Weed Department to
contain weeds before and during construction.
Soils Limitations:
N/A—Soil is sandy, so maintaining cover during construction would be important to keep
from having problems with dirt blowing.
Other concems:
Summary comments: Q
mt„.72..e70( 62„,icataen.
C'ONS'ER f"1TION-DEVELOPMENT-SELF GOFERNAIENT
cfeiwa."--N.)
Kis Weld County Referral
Weld County Planning Department
Ville
GREELEY OFFICE July 6, 2006
JUL 2 C 2006
COLORADO RECEIVED
The Weld County Department of Planning Services has received the following item for review:
Applicant Don & Linda Owens - Case Number PF-521
Gloraloma Estates
Please Reply By August 4, 2006 Planner Kim Ogle
Project PUD Final Plan for nineteen (19) residential lots with E (Estate)uses, Gloraloma
Estates PUD
Legal Lot B RE-1921; part SE4 Section 9, T2N, R67W of the 6th P.M., Weld County,
Colorado.
Location North of and adjacent to CR 22; west of and adjacent to CR 19.
Parcel Number 1311 09 400065
The application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you
consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Please reply by the above listed date so that we may
give full consideration to your recommendation. Any response not received before or on this date may be
deemed to be a positive response to the Department of Planning Services. If you have any further questions
regarding the application, please call the Planner associated with the request. Please note that new
information may be added to applications under review during the review process. If you desire to
examine or obtain this additional information, please call the Department of Planning Services.
Board of County Commissioners Hearing (if applicable) August 30, 2006
❑ We have reviewed the request and find that it does/does not comply with our Comprehensive Plan
e have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests.
See attached letter.
Signature , ,, ' Date KC ,7 70(J.F
't ' L c E p I J
Agency � � x,I ♦ C 64,12_ -i4-2,1,,) • ���"
+Weld County Planning Dept. +1555 N. 17th Ave. Greeley,CO. 80631 +(970)353-6100 ext.3540 ❖(970)304-6498 fax
Weld County School District RE- 1
Gilcrest • LaSalle • Platteville
P.O. Box 157
14827 W.C.R.42
Gilcrest,CO 80623
Dr.Jo Barbie, Superintendent Phone 970-737-2403
Jeff Cogburn, Director of Auxiliary Services and Personnel Fax 970-737-2516
Ann Sims, Director of Learning Services Metro 303-629-9337
Keith Ouweneel,Director of Technology
July 24,2006
Weld County Planning Department
Attention: Chris Gathman
1555 North 17th Avenue
Greeley,Colorado 80631
RE: Case Number PF-521
Dear Mr. Gathman:
Weld County School District RE-1 has reached an agreement with Don and Linda Owens regarding the school districts concerns
addressed in a letter to the planning department on August 9,2003. The cul-de-sac will have a radius of 45 feet or more to
accommodate a 78-passenger bus. Don and Linda Owens understand that road conditions due to inclement weather may
prohibit bus pick-up and drop-off from time-to-time. They agree to inform potential homeowners that road conditions may be a
problem for school district transportation. Don and Linda Owens also agree to pay the in lieu payment in the amount of
$20,029.80 to the school district upon the sale of the parcels to a developer. Should each parcel sell individually, Don and Linda
Owens agree to pay the school district the in lieu payment of$1,054.20 for each parcel at the time of sale. Please find the
agreement between the school district and Don and Linda Owens attached.
Sincerely, (�
. (VAC??. cam_
Jo Barbie
Superintendent of Schools
Enclosure
pc: Don and Linda Owens
Cheryl Brewster, District Finance Officer
BOARD OF EDUCATION
Jack Baier Karl S.Yamaguchi Cynthia Hochmiller Marsha Harris Larrry A.Ewing Nancy Sarchet
President Vice President Secretary Treasurer Director Director
Our Total Commitment is to Provide an Exemplary Education and Safe Environment for all Students
rona sb: 0b '31a-737-2516 RE-1 ADMIN PAGE 02
Agreement
Mr. Don Owens and Mrs. Linda Owens
and
Weld County School District RE-1
Weld County School District RE-1 and Mr. Don Owens and Mrs. Linda Owens agree to the
following terms regarding Weld County Planning Department Case #PZ-521
1, Mr. and Mrs. Owens agree to construct a cul-de-sac with a radius of 45 feet or more.
2. Mr. and Mrs. Owens agree to inform potential homeowners that road conditions may prohibit
school district transportation ingress and egress due to inclement weather.
3. Mr. and Mrs. Owens agree to pay the school district the full in lieu payment of$21,084.00
upon the sale of the parcels to a developer. Should each parcel sell individually, Mr. and
Mrs. Owens agree to pay the school district the in lieu payment of$1,054.20 for each parcel
at the time of sale.
/O Olit.eiliaJ S/22/d3 61/2 5703
Mr. Don Owens Date Jo B4Gie Date
Superintendent of Schools
Mrs. Linda Owens Date
Weld County Planning Department
GREELEY OFFICE
itiptit
MAR 3 0 2006
MEMORANDUM RECEIVED
WIlD
TO: Chris Gathman, Planning Department DATE: 29-March-2006
eFROM: Jesse Hein, Publi Department
COLORADO SUBJECT: PF-521 Gloraloma Estates PUD (Final Plat)
Weld County Public Works Department has reviewed final plan materials and has the following development referral
comments.
Comments
❑ CR 19 is classified by the County as a collector road(Weld County Roadway Classification Plan,June 2002)east and adjacent to
the proposed development requiring an 80-foot right-of-way. The applicant shall show CR 19 and dimension the 80-foot right-of-
way shown on the final plat. The applicant shall verify the existing right-of-way,noting the inception documents on the final plat.
❑ The Pavement Thickness Design from Terracon Consulting Engineers and Scientists(Project No. 21995142)dated November 17,
1999 states the Aggregate Base Course Depth will be 4"thick based on the current foundation soil and subgrade.
o It appears that the Oil/Gas heavy vehicles will access the internal roadways of the subdivision. The applicant must
address the pavement design to support said vehicle loadings.
o The applicant must address the concern of pavement damage by the heavy Oil/Gas equipment.
❑ County Code 8-2-40 states no access approach shall have an effective turning radius of less than twenty(20) feet. The applicant
shall modify the road layout(C2,C3,C29, C30,C48)to coincide with minimum"curb"/turn radii of 20-feet.
-3 The design of the 30' Oil/Gas and Irrigation easement in the Northwest corner of the development has turning radii which may be
difficult for a larger Oil/Gas or drilling truck to maneuver through. Public Works asks the applicant to provide written evidence
that the proposed access geometries are sufficient to accommodate Oil/Gas equipment.
❑ The applicant or their agents may be required to obtain permits from Weld County's Public Works - Utility Agent, for each
utility.
❑ The applicant shall re-submit to Public Works amended sealed final roadway / construction / grading plan drawings and Final
Drainage Report for acceptance by Public Works prior to recording final plat.
❑ The applicant must submit two (2) additional sets of final roadway, drainage, utility / construction plan drawings (stamped,
signed,and dated)to Public Works for Weld County Field Inspectors' use during construction of the subdivision.
❑ The submitted drainage report appears to be appropriate,but a detailed drainage and stromwater review will be forthcoming.
Recommendation
❑ The above comments are prerequisites and shall be fulfilled prior to recording the final plat.
Any issues shaft be resolved with Public Works prior to recording of the final plat:
PC:PF-521 Gloraloma Estates POD(Final Plat)
Email&Original:Planner:Chris Gathman
P• ('by Post: Applicant:
PC by Post: Engineer:Pickett Engineering Inc.
Page 1 of 1 _
PZ-521 Issues
1) Proposing individual septic systems within Firestone IGA. (Have placed calls to Tri
Area Sanitation & St. Vrain Sanitation re: proximity of water lines).
2) Annexation agreement pending with Firestone. (Still no indication from Firestone as to
when annexation agreement will be signed and executed). Given impression that
agreement was going to be signed ASAP before I set up application.
3) Two draft agreements with oil & gas operators (Patina & Encana) - However- several
other parties are listed as owners/leaseholds. (Sent fax to applicants rep. Regarding that
this would need to be addressed prior to (or at) Planning Commission hearing. (Evidence
of notification for Union Pacific re: Coal? - check list & call UP (Molly Sommerville).
* Appears that one additional drilling location is available - however they could still twin
existing wells if need be.
* Appears to be in coal resource area (word from Union Pacific on coal resources).
* 60-foot setback from Patina gas lines (unsleeved) - 25-feet if sleeved.
*
4) Equestrian trail stops in certain areas and does not border all lots within the subdivision.
5) Open space. Question on connectivity. Several open space areas contain tank batteries
are just siting by themselves (outlot D).
6) Tract A- No evidence that they can access across neighboring property or Coal Ridge
Ditch to get to Tract A.
itotrig
MEMORANDUM
IDTO: Jesse Hein, E.I.,Pub is orks DATE: 5-April-2006
O FROM: Brian aE.,Public Works Department
COLORADO SUBJECT: PF-0521 Gloraloma Estates PUD(Final Plan)
Weld County Public Works Department has reviewed this Final plan request. Comments made during this
phase of the subdivision process may not be all-inclusive, as other concerns or issues may arise during the
remaining application process.
Drainage Comments
❑ Public Works received a Final Drainage Report for Gloraloma Estates PUD (PF -0521) on March 8, 2006.
The report was submitted for final approval by Pickett Engineering,Inc., and is dated March 7, 2006.
❑ The Final Drainage Report is stamped, signed, and dated by R. Sean Phipps,P.E. #37698.
❑ Gloraloma Estates PUD is planned for 19 single family residential sites on 69 acres northwest of the
intersection of WCR 19 and WCR 22.
General Comments:
❑ Weld County will not be responsible for the maintenance of drainage related areas. The applicant must note
-- this in the Final Drainage Report.
❑ A drainage easement will be required with the owners/operators of the Coal Ridge Ditch, and the
landowner(s) on the downstream side of the Coal Ridge Ditch to receive any flows from the proposed site.
The drainage design must assume this ditch is running full during the 100-year storm, or that the ditch may
later be abandoned. This full-flow assumption was made on the Stanley Ditch/Bull Canal in the upstream
section of the development,and should be made again at the downstream limit of the project.
o Tract A has the potential to act as a detention pond during storm events, and significant ponding
may occur at the site. Please show the approximate potential inundation limits of this ponding on
a map and discuss in text.
o The inundated area must be dedicated as a permanent drainage easement
o If infiltration is to occur,please provide calculations to show the rate of infiltration and copy
pertinent portions of the soil report into the appendix of the drainage report.
❑ The 5-year historic runoff for sub-basins Ex-I through Ex-5 cannot be determined using the allowable unit
flow release rates from the USDCM,Volume 2, Chapter 10, Section 3.2.1. Please revise the historic flows
analysis to comply with Weld County CODE 24-7-130(D).
Text Comments for the Final Drainage Report:
❑ Linda Lane and Gloraloma Way are street names referenced in text. The figures and drawings included in the
Final Drainage Report do not show the location of these streets. Please identify these streets on all drawings
sheets and in a figure in the report text.
❑ Please add the following summary tables to the end of Chapter II,or the appendix of the Final Drainage
Report:
o Hydrologic basin characteristics and flows for historic and developed conditions.
....__s s__.__.. Page 1 of 3
o All culverts, inc ng name/location, size, material, slope, ii. .t elevations, 100-yr headwater
depth(HW100), 100-yr flow(Qtoo), and inlet/outlet control.
o Open channels under 100-year hydraulic conditions. Please include flow(Qtpo),maximum
velocity(V,,,,,),base width(B), side slopes(Z),bed slope (S0),Froude number(Fr), maximum
depth(y,n,x), freeboard,and channel lining.
o Detention ponds, including 10- and 100-yr WSELs, storage volume (Stop), WCQV,outlet
configuration(pipe type and size,pipe name/number,orifice plate size, etc.), emergency weir
crest elevation,max weir flow and depth, and freeboard.
❑ In Chapter III, Section C of the Final Drainage Report the sub-basin ND is undetained. However, in Chapter
V, Section B (Specific Details) and Section C (Conclusions)note that detention ponds were proposed through
the entire property. This is justified by the following statement from Section C: "When developed, the site's
runoff will be increased. Detention ponds throughout the site will control the increased runoff from the site. "
o This statement clearly justifies the need for detention at all sites through the project.
o Please revise the drainage patterns for sub-basin ND to include new detention.
o If the grading cannot be refined to include detention for this 6.8 acre sub-basin,then the flow
contribution from this undetained basin must be subtracted from the total allowable 5-year
historic release.
Appendix Comments for the Final Drainage Report:
❑ Please address all redline comments in the Final Drainage Report.
❑ Please add a north arrow to the Vicinity map, and place a larger scale on the map for ease of reading. Please
indicate the location of Tract A, and of the development site for clarity.
❑ Please include responses to the letter to Don Martin and the e-mail to Mr. Montoya in the next submittal.
Both of these correspondence items were sent on March 6, 2006. The final drainage report is dated March 7,
2006, and any responses may affect drainage on the project site.
❑ Please list the equations used in Table 1 and Table 3 for completeness of documentation and ease of review.
• ❑ Detention ponds:
o_ Please limit the emergency overflow depth of all detention ponds to a maximum of 6 inches.
• Emergency overflow sections must have permanent erosion control features on both the
upstream and downstream face.
• Emergency overflow sections must include cutoff walls for safety.
• The location of the emergency overflow section must be clearly marked in plan view on
sheet C-5.2 and sheets C-9.1 through C-9.6.
• Please include a cross section of emergency overflow weirs on all ponds in sheets C-9.1
through C-9.6.
o Please use the 10-yr storm to determine the WQCV of all proposed detention ponds at the
Gloraloma site.
• Please propose an outlet structure design for all ponds that meets 10-yr water quality
requirements and 100-yr release limitations.
• The orifice for the water quality release is elevated 0.65 ft to 1.25 ft above the pond
invert in the WQCV calculations for all proposed ponds. The detail sheet,however,
shows the bottom of the orifice approximately 2 inches above the invert of the outlet
pipe. Please determine which of these scenarios is correct for each pond, and show how
water drains from detention ponds in minor storms (5-yr and less).
❑ Trapezoidal channels:
o Please move all titles away from the comb binding so they are legible.
o Maintain channel slopes between 0.2% and 0.6% for grass-lined channels. Any channels
exceeding 0.6% will require permanent erosion control features.
o Please limit open channel Froude numbers to 0.50 or less for public safety and erosion protection.
• The maximum Froude number shall be determined from the maximum channel velocity.
• The maximum channel velocity shall be determined using a minimum Manning's-n value
of 0.030, as per USDCM, Volume 1, Chapter 7,Table MD-2.
Page 2 of 3
o Please determin _appropriate channel lining for all propos apen channels.
❑ Culverts:
o Please use roughness coefficients (Manning's-n's) of 0.013 for all RCPs,and 0.025 for all CMPs
in the project.
o Please maintain a minimum pipe slope of 0.40% on all proposed culverts to prevent low-flow
clogging due to sedimentation.
o Please note where all tailwater depths are reported from.
o Please show design calculations for North American Green ECB at culvert outlets. The product
type, dimensions, and installation must be verified as acceptable culvert outlet protection.
Drawings Comments(D-size Sheets:
❑ Please address all redline comments in the plan set and on sheets C-5.1, C-5.2, and C-5.3 included in the map
sleeves in the appendix of the Final Drainage Report.
❑ Please address all comments in the final plan set.
❑ Please add a copy of the erosion control sheet to the Final Drainage Report appendix.
e ewL� � � a � - i e S e a s `3r� � �� s .n YF� BAi"c��C.
a . ..: 1c '� i l t a 5 ,a .a ry tr-
e a Ys eg ' 'e � � a B a^u r
Page3of3
WELD COUNTY DRAINAGE REPORT CHECKLIST
Name: Gloreloma Estates PUD Plan Date: March 8,2006 from Pickett Engineering,Inc.
Location: NW Corner of WCR 19 and WCR 22 Rev.Date: April 5,2006
II Case ft: PF-0521 Rev.By: Brian K.Varrella,Public Works
Comment Headings Adequately Inadequately I Not Not Comments
Addressed Addressed Addressed Applicable
I. General Location and Description
A. Location
1.Township,Range,Section,'A-Section X
2.Local streets within and adjacent to the development X
3.Major open channels,lakes,streams,irrigation and other
water resource facilities within and adjacent to proposed X
development
4.Names of surrounding developments including jurisdiction X
(municipalities)
B. Description of Property
1. Area in acres X
2. Ground cover X
3. Major open channels and ownership X
4. General project description X
5. Irrigation facilities and ownership information X
6. Groundwater characteristics where applicable X
II. Drainage Basins and Sub-Basins
A. Major Basin Description
1.Reference to Weld County Master Drainage Plan(s)where X
applicable
2.Major basin drainage characteristics X
3.Identification of all irrigation facilities within 200 ft of the X
property boundary
B. Sub-Basin Description
1.Historic drainage patterns on the subject property and X
adjacent properties
2.Off-site drainage flow patterns and impacts on the subject X Some offsite flow from the south may need
property reevaluation,as per redline comments.
III.Drainage Design Criteria
Discussion of the optional criteria/deviation from Weld The allowable unit release rate method
A. County CODE X (Table SO-1)from the USDCM is not
accepted in Weld Co.
B. Development Criteria Reference and Constraints
1.Discussion of previous drainage studies(i.e.project master
plans)for the subject property that influence or are influenced by X
the proposed drainage design for the site
2.Discussion of site constraints such as slopes,streets,utilities, The runoff termination at Tract A next to the
existing structures,and the proposed development or site plan X ditch seems hydrologically' plete.
impacts on the proposed drainage planincomplete.
C. Hydrologic Criteria
1.Identify design rainfall(source of design storm depth X
information,NOAA Atlas,UD&FCD maps,etc.)
2.Identify design storm recurrence intervals X WQCV should be determined using the 70-
year storm.
3.identify runoff calculation method(s)and any computer X
models
4.Identify detention discharge and storage calculation X WQCV should be determined using the 10-
method(s)and computer models year storm.
The maximum release rate shall be the 5-yr
5.Discussion and justification of other criteria or calculation X historic discharge,as per Weld Co.CODE
methods used 24-7-130(D.2). Table SO-1 from USDCM
does not apply to Weld Co.
D. Hydraulic Criteria
1.Identify various capacity County References X
2.Identify detention outlet type X Please add a W Q outlet design for all
ponds,and include detail drawings.
3.Identify check/drop structure criteria used X
4.Discussion of other drainage facility design criteria used X
IV. Drainage Facility Design
Weld County Public Works
1 of 2
Drainage Report Checklist Form Updated 01-27-2006
Comment Headings Adequately Inadequately Not Not
1 Addressed I
Addressed I
Addressed I Applicable CommentsA. General Concept
1.Discussion of concept and typical drainage patterns X
2.Discussion of compliance with off-site runoff considerations X Tract A?
. and constraints
3.Discussion of the content of all tables,charts,figures,or X Please add summary tables to the text
drawings presented in the report portion of the report.
4.Discussion of anticipated and proposed drainage patterns X
B. Specific Details
1.Discussion of compliance with drainage criteria(street,inlet, X Minor changes required as per comments in
and pipe capacities,etc.) drainage report.
2.Discussion of drainage problems encountered and solutions X Tract A? Water must drain someplace,and
at specific design points drainage easements may be required.
Please add a WQ outlet design for all
3.Discussion of detention storage and outlet design X
ponds,and include detail drawings.
Weld Co.will not be responsible for the
4.Discussion of maintenance access and aspects of the design X maintenance of drainage related features.
Please note in text.
V. Conclusions
A. Drainage concept
1.Effectiveness of drainage design to control damage from X Tract A?
storm runoff
2.Influence of proposed development on any applicable Weld X
County Master Drainage Plan recommendations
3.Identification of and written approval of affected irrigation
company or other property owner(s). Weld County may require Project may affect the Coal Ridge Ditch,
that the applicant provide evidence that offsite impacted X which requires a drainage easement
jurisdictions have been notified of the proposed drainage plans
and potential impacts.
VI. References
A. Reference all criteria and technical information used X
VII.Appendices
e".".. A. Hydrologic Computations
1.Land use assumptions regarding adjacent properties X
2.Initial and major storm runoff computations at specific design X
points
The maximum release rate shall be the 5-yr
3.Historic and fully developed runoff computations at specific
design points X historic discharge,as per Weld Co.CODE
24-7-130(D.2).
B. Hydraulic Computations
1.Culvert sizing X
2.Storm sewer sizing X
3.Street capacity evaluation X
4.Storm inlet sizing X
6.Open channel sizing X
7.Check dam and/or drop structure sizing X
8.Detention pond area/volume capacity and outlet sizing X
9.Changes to Calculation Methods—if applicant/design
engineer modifies any portion of UD&FCD spreadsheets used
for hydrologic or hydraulic calculations,the applicant/design X
engineer shall identify all changes to calculation assumptions or
computer programs as to type of change and specific factors
that were modified. _
,r+.
Weld County Public Works Page 2 of 2
Drainage Report Checklist Form Updated 01-27-2006
Weld SOUTHWESTBUI DING
Planning Department
County
AUG 2 2006
Avit:Vi MEMORANDUM RECEIVED
VIITO: Kim Ogle,Planning Department DATE: 28-July-2006
PC. FROM: Jesse Hein, Public artment
COLORADO SUBJECT: PF-521 0 oma Estates PUD (Final Plat)2
Weld County Public Works Department has reviewed final plan materials and has the following development referral
comments.
Comments
This memorandum is a follow up to comments dated March 29, 2006.
❑ Public Works has received the entire Final Application packet.
❑ The packet is complete; however, the comments and requirements outlined in previous memorandums from Public
Works must be met before final plat acceptance can be made. These comments include the previous memorandum
dated March 29, 2006 and the drainage attachment comments dated April 5, 2006.
❑ All review shall commence upon the requested items being resubmitted to the Public Works Department.
Recommendation
❑ The above comments are prerequisites and shall be fulfilled prior to recording the final plat.
Any issues sh$H be resolved with Public Works prior to recording odh$eftndtpht: `
PC:PF-521 Gloraloma Estates PUD(Final Plat)2
Email&Original:Planner:Kim Ogle
PC by Post: Applicant:
PC by Post: Engineer:Pickett Engineering Inc.
�"�„� Page 1 of 1 mw
Weld County Planning Departrr
of
. SOUTHWEST BUILDING
AUG 2 2006
rsts 0
Weld County Rer� SVED
"i
lk
July 6, 2006
COLORADO
The Weld County Department of Planning Services has received the following item for review:
Applicant Don & Linda Owens - Case Number PF-521
Gloraloma Estates
Please Reply By August 4, 2006 Planner Kim Ogle
Project PUD Final Plan for nineteen (19) residential lots with E (Estate) uses, Gloraloma
Estates PUD
Legal Lot B RE-1921; part SE4 Section 9, T2N, R67W of the 6th P.M., Weld County,
Colorado.
Location North of and adjacent to CR 22; west of and adjacent to CR 19.
Parcel Number 1311 09 400065
The application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you
consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Please reply by the above listed date so that we may
give full consideration to your recommendation. Any response not received before or on this date may be
deemed to be a positive response to the Department of Planning Services. If you have any further questions
regarding the application, please call the Planner associated with the request. Please note that new
information may be added to applications under review during the review process. If you desire to
examine or obtain this additional information, please call the Department of Planning Services.
Board of County Commissioners Hearing (if applicable) August 30, 2006
❑ We have reviewed the request and find that it does/does not comply with our Comprehensive Plan
e have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests.
See attached letter.
/ rt.
Signature �/� GQ , Date
ii-A- oG,
Agency S 67c -i-,-i-'S o i=/=L C-=
„---
.Weld County Planning Dept. 41555 N. 17th Ave.Greeley,CO.80631 +(970)353-6100 ext.3540 4(970)304-6498 fax
Weld County Sheriff's
Office
M e mo
To: Kim Ogle
From: Ken Poncelow
Date: July 27, 2006
Re: PF-521
The Sheriffs Office recommends the following improvements for this housing sub-division:
1. The Sheriffs Office requests that builders and developers designate an area by the entrance of
the sub-division in which to place a shelter for school children awaiting the school bus. This
area should also include a pull off for the school bus which enables it to safely load and unload
children out of the roadway.
2. Either mail distribution within the sub-division or a central drop off location within the sub-division
should be developed so that residents do not have to cross a county road to obtain their mail.
3. A permanent sign should be placed at the entrance to the subdivision detailing the name of the
sub-division, address, and a graphical presentation of the roadways within the subdivision.
There should be a plan developed to maintain this sign.
4. If the roadways within this sub-division are not maintained or adopted by the county, individuals
purchasing property in this sub-division should be notified that the Sheriffs Office will have
limited traffic enforcement powers.
5. A plan should be developed to maintain roadways within the sub-division especially during
inclement weather conditions for emergency vehicles.
6. The Sheriffs Office is very supportive of homeowner funded homeowner's associations. These
associations provide a contact for the Sheriffs Office and a means of maintaining common
areas.
7. If there are oil or gas production facilities within this sub-division, they need to be fenced off in
order to mitigate the potential for tampering. These facilities are known to create an attractive
nuisance for young people. Tampering not only creates a significant danger to safety but also of
environmental damage with extensive mitigation and clean-up costs.
8. The names of all streets within the sub-division should be presented to the Sheriffs Office for
approval. This will eliminate duplication of street names within the county.
9. The Sheriffs Office encourages Law Enforcement Authorities to provide additional funding for
law enforcement requirements in the future.
The Sheriffs Office lacks the ability to absorb any additional service demand without the resources
recommended in the multi-year plan provided to the Weld County Board of County Commissioners or as
1
indicated by growth not considered at the time the plan was developed. I have no other comments on this
proposal.
•Page 2
08/01/2006 10: 11 ST. VRRIN SANITATION DISTRICT 4 819703046498 NO.844 P03
. 4
St. Vrain
SARI TATI ON
DI NTRICT
August 1, 2006
Don and Linda Owens
Gloraloma Estates
8585 WCR 22
Fort Lupton, CO 80621
RE: Gloraloma Estates
Dear Mr. and Mrs. Owens,
The District has received the development referral for Gloraloma Estates. Service to the
area is subject to the following.
Upon Completion of Homestead Heights Subdivision in Firestone, sewer service will be
within '/ mile of proposed development.
Sewer service is contingent upon extension of WCR 26 Line Extension.
Service is subject to SVSD Rules and Regulations and applicable fees.
If you have any questions or concerns, please contact me at(303) 776-9570.
Sincerely,
Megan brat
Project istant
St.Vrain Sanitation District
11307 Business Park Circle Firestone, CO 80504
Phone(303) 776-9570 Fax. (303)485-1068
STATE OF COLORADO
1pR'!O
Bill Owens,Governor TF
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES Weld County Planning Departmentb , "
DIVISION OF WILDLIFE SOUTHWEST BUILDING 3� -a
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER AUG 2 2006 �'OF`�
Bruce
6060 Broadwyey, Director RECEIVED Forlpife-
Denver,Colorado 80216 For Peop le
Telephone:(303)297-1192
July 13, 2006
Kim Ogle
Weld County Planning Department
1555 N. 17th Avenue
Greeley, CO 80631
RE: Gloraloma Estates PUD, Case#PF-521
Dear Ms. Ogle,
Thank you for providing the Colorado Division of Wildlife the opportunity to comment on this proposed
development. My staff recently visited this site. District Wildlife Manager John Koehler also spoke on-site with
applicant Don Owens.
The site has been used extensively for grazing in the past. It is our understanding that no trees will be removed as a
result of this development and that the existing pond and wetland area is outside of the area to be developed. That
being the case, I expect minimal impacts to wildlife and wildlife habitat as a result of this project. Please consider,
however,the following recommendations:
• Please refer to the Natural Diversity Information System(NDIS)website at http://ndis.nrel.colostate.edu
regarding Threatened or Endangered species which may occur on site(for information regarding insects or
plants please contact the Colorado Natural Heritage Program).
• Raptors are protected by state and federal law. If construction activities are to occur from the late winter to
summer months and if construction will cause the destruction of mature trees, said trees should be surveyed
for the presence of nesting raptors. Physical destruction of an active raptor nest is prohibited. Construction
occurring near active nest sites may cause abandonment of the nest.
• To the greatest extent possible, revegetation and landscaping should be completed using native plant species.
A list of native species and their value to wildlife can be obtained by calling the Division of Wildlife at(303)
291-7227.
• The surrounding area is home to a large diversity of wildlife. New homeowners should be made aware of
potential interactions/conflicts with woodpeckers,raccoons,coyotes, skunks, foxes,deer,rabbits, and other
wildlife, prior to moving into their homes. Yards should be kept clear of garbage and other items that may
attract wildlife. Wildlife-proof/resistant trash containment is highly recommended.
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES,Russell George,Executive Director
WILDLIFE COMMISSION,Jeffrey Crawford,Chair•Tom Burke,Vice Chair•Claire O'Neal,Secretary
Members,Robert Bray•Brad Coors•Rick Enstrom•Richard Ray•James McAnaly•Ken Torres
Ex Officio Members,Russell George and Don Ament
•
Please contact John Koehler at(303)439-9664 if you have questions or concerns. Thank you again.
Sincerely,
--R 4 rf L A '-
Scott Hoover
Northeast Regional Supervisor
Cc:Mark Leslie—Area Wildlife Manager
John Koehler—District Wildlife Manager
STATE OF COLORADO
OFFICE OF THE STATE ENGINEER 4;6;i-co
livision of Water Resources �,-
Department of Natural Resources Weld County Planning Department �
S0'IT rST PHU DING
1313 Sherman Street, Room 818 r‘arae,rr
Denver,Colorado 80203 July 11, 2006 J U i_ 1 q 7006 '1876
Phone(303)866-3581
FAX(303)866-3589 p� e, eill Owens
www.water.state.co.us M' E p, �6: .,/ E D Governor
.Y 11.ys i V Russell George
Kim Ogle Executive Director
Weld County Planning Dept State
Engineer
l D.s Simpson,P.E.
1555 N 17th Ave.
Greeley, CO 80631
RE: Gloraloma Estates, PF-521
Section 9, T2N, R67W, 6th P.M.
Water Division 1, Water District 2
Dear Mr. Ogle:
We have reviewed the additional information submitted for the above referenced
proposal to subdivide 105.7 acres into 19 residential lots. The proposed water source is the
Central Weld County Water District (District). A letter of commitment for service has been
submitted.
The water supply information summary previously submitted stated that the 20 lots
previously proposed would require a total of 36.9 acre-feet of water per year (approximately
1.85 acre-feet per lot). Information submitted by the District on November 12, 1998 stated that
the District had approximately 5,787.3 acre-feet secure water supplies for a dry year. In
addition, the District has been requiring that new developments provide CBT water shares to
serve their proposed lots. Currently, approximately 5471.3 acre-feet has been committed,
which includes this proposal.
Pursuant to Section 30-28-136(1)(h)(II), C.R.S. the State Engineer's Office offers the
opinion that the proposed water supply will not cause material injury to existing water rights, and
with the Central Weld County Water District serving the proposal, the supply is expected to be
adequate.
If you have any questions in this matter, please contact Joanna Williams of this office.
Sincerely,
Xyyer� �j �/J
S72/ (J, iLO_/irt
Kevin G. Rein, P.E.
Chief of Water Supply
KGR/JMW
CC: Jim Hall, Division 1 Office
'-' Water Supply Branch
Subdivision File
Weld County Planning Department
CREELEY OFFICE
AUG 1 8 2006
RECEIVED
(it MEMORANDUM
ITO: Kim Ogle, W.C. Planning
C. DATE: August 15, 2006
COLORADO FROM: Pam Smith, W.C. Department of Public Health and J
Environment
CASE NO.: PF-521 NAME: Don Owens/Gloraioma Estates
The Weld County Health Department has reviewed this Final Plan application and offers the
following observations:
1. The Specific Development Guide states 'Professionally engineered individual sewage
disposal systems will be required for each proposed residence. A homeowners association
will manage the maintenance of the septic system. The homeowners association will
establish a schedule for the required maintenance and will collect association dues to pay the
costs associated with the maintenance.' However, the applicant will be submitting a
separate letter removing that language from the Specific Guide.
2. The language in the covenants regarding the septic envelopes is adequate (Section 3.7.1).
3. Septic envelopes are adequately sizes.
4. The notes on the Final Plat are satisfactory.
O:\PAM\Planning\Final Plat\PZ-521.DOC
r
Hello