The URL can be used to link to this page

Browse Search

Home My WebLink About20060209.tiff WIPO, LLC A Colorado Limited Liability Company 1600 West Horsetooth Road,Fort Collins,CO 80526 970-226-2046 Weld County Planning Department GREELEY OFFICE December 9, 2005 DEC: 12 Z005 RECEIVED Kim Ogle Department of Planning Services 918 10th Street Greeley, Co 80631 RE: Change of Zone application for Falcon Ridge PUD PZ-545 Dear Kim Ogle: As stated in your conversations with Bret Larimer, it is our desire to plated forward to the County Commissioners with this application. Please submit all require documents to the Clerk of the Board so that we may get on the agenda. Should you have any questions, please call. 5 Si rely, Lb \itj ie Sullivan EXN1T 2006-0209 WI PO LLC A Colorado Limited Liability Company 1600 West Horsetooth Road, Fort Collins, CO 80526 970-226-2046 January 27, 2006 Clerk to the Board PC) Box 758 Greeley, CO 80632 Fax #970-352-0242 Attn: Esther RE: PZ#545 Bret Larimer We are requesting a continuance for our hearing scheduled for February 1, 2006. The reason for the continuance is to provide the Health Department with additional requested information. Due to both Pam Smith and Trevor Jiricek of the Health Department being unavailable to review the additional information prior to the meeting we agreed that it would be best to seek a one or two week continuance of the hearing. We appreciate your consideration of this request. Should you have any questions or need any additional information please do not hesitate to give us a call. Sincerely, Julie Sullivan cc: Kim Ogle, Planner EXHIBIT r #sq5 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS' SIGN POSTING CERTIFICATE THE LAST DAY TO POST THE SIGN IS JANUARY 17, 2006. THE SIGN SHALL BE POSTED ADJACENT TO AND VISIBLE FROM A PUBLICALLY MAINTAINED ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY. IN THE EVENT THE PROPERTY BEING CONSIDERED FOR A SPECIAL REVIEW IS NOT ADJACENT TO A PUBLICALLY MAINTAINED ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY, THE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES SHALL POST ONE SIGN IN THE MOST PROMINENT PLACE ON THE PROPERTY AND POST A SECOND SIGN AT THE POINT AT WHICH THE DRIVEWAY (ACCESS DRIVE) INTERSECTS A PUBLICALLY MAINTAINED ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY. I, VONEEN MACKLIN, HEREBY CERTIFY UNDER PENALTIES OF PERJURY THAT THE SIGN WAS POSTED ON THE PROPERTY AT LEAST FIFTEEN DAYS BEFORE THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS HEARING FOR PZ-545_IN THE AGRICULTURAL ZONE DISTRICT. VONEEN MACKLIN Name of Person Posting Sign NLIt �� M-V-U Signature of Person Posting Sign STATE OF COLORADO ) ) ss. COUNTY OF WELD ) y q The foregoing instrument was subscribed and sworn to me this' 1 day of.„ ,(,ict 1.1L-1q , 20a1). WITNESS my hand and official seal. U �_d. ul w � Notary Public My Commission Expires: �(l i EXHIBIT c , /__ r a if ra arc +'s�Yw - NOTICE i c' cowxAno I' A PUBLIC HEARING CONCERNING ,4 THIS PROPERTY WILL BE HELD AT: S ti /1-'-X, - �5 I�� TQ.fL�' 1 r/ � ! Lh^E£l�.�j� CO / I OA — Ctnhnmial Center ;i; i>; ON!- , 20� Ai I_NAME rE:T L4Q-k-mC-Q REQUEST Cho E'ur tUa &lot I 4x^ ` °`°'' 0tkel rsaaC. LI - T0O, cf CASE NO -P? 5j yS ww 0 e. FOR MORE INFORMATION CAL�REs , / WELD COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF 41f -' PLANNING SERVICES AT F . � ,,�' ` (970)353-6100 ext. 3540 1u 2006 / 01 / 17 1 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS' SIGN POSTING CERTIFICATE THE LAST DAY TO POST THE SIGN IS FEBRUARY 7, 2005 THE SIGN SHALL BE POSTED ADJACENT TO AND VISIBLE FROM A PUBLICALLY MAINTAINED ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY. IN THE EVENT THE PROPERTY BEING CONSIDERED FOR A SPECIAL REVIEW IS NOT ADJACENT TO A PUBLICALLY MAINTAINED ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY, THE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES SHALL POST ONE SIGN IN THE MOST PROMINENT PLACE ON THE PROPERTY AND POST A SECOND SIGN AT THE POINT AT WHICH THE DRIVEWAY (ACCESS DRIVE) INTERSECTS A PUBLICALLY MAINTAINED ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY. I, KIM OGLE, HEREBY CERTIFY UNDER PENALTIES OF PERJURY THAT THE SIGN WAS POSTED ON THE PROPERTY AT LEAST FIFTEEN DAYS BEFORE THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS HEARING FOR A CHANGE OF ZONE FROM AGRICULTURE TO PUD- ESTATE FOR 38 RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENTS WITH 26 ACRES MORE OR LESS OF OPEN SPACE LOCATED OUTSIDE OF AN IGA OR UGB; NORTH OF THE TOWN OF WINDSOR. VONEEN MACKLIN Name of Person Posting Sign Signature of Person Posting Sign STATE OF COLORADO ) ss. COUNTY OF WELD The foregoing instrument was subscribed and fgttbfGa day of , 2006. WITNESS my hand and official seal. J .•O BAR `�� /J• 3,. • JQ� Nom :° 0;00 Notary Public ��r C Ol DeP My Commission Expires: 1O11'{ la OO 7 MOUNT "Ft =a CO O O CN ......., _ _ _ _ 4 - ' O 1Z J a ..aaC t i ag ma =9 CWQ � w - r@w _0 Ca 11;- pZ3_� �' OpWo �'o Li Eti-p § ?ill_zwd - 0 ` WZz �= irtOn ua: OD i. c oe .J ea ; QS Liu = `= W � � v -� vii- Z C WCO W p c z GC eo 3i D 7i 6 n d h W ms = W yamncl . W i r 4jj - • ®mu mint 1 �`®C3 ® I I 1 • 11111111 MIN IIIII ..pk fT�_m_B Hon Mull milli [-t.. ELE_LL 3 I ............. „„ 'I II II 'I II II II II II II kiLJ d 1[[l r[[i® _ ----.�.,-, ._ ., __ U�ul tifr �� T.�■1111 S , I I 'v ;--..\ / ,,,, +f.l' g O4.1 ,..s..7:•.,,,,, ti -4t] •' 4 .4.- � t • 'tea. i ..,6 i 11 JaPatili I i 'A 'c."--\. .11-1-1 .I' .., Ii ' 4, ...,.."Re,-,i-Laa.,.........„,-- _ . .... . i I ;„ I - ,. 1 -----,_ ..._........ /r 11�Ilasl �* l\ .-_ --,.,_„,. IC.---\ / ---, .- ---...e„...„_, hrnelnfaS;.,, w Ilr ��imam : j /1/1■ +'f Li1■�. i1l1� %'��// / t // 114tiiii wk.Yu Ss am re no J/ ,I 1'fffflU am Ai Pl.... up=Olio `111111 IIIIIIII , Ih \Yi 1 ^`-- •.se: s.m+_�..�aa ..ae-awee-aw�.ws.-.e-c-n: .. . .__ mm..c,-...... _. _..._..- _o. 9 /I a) ca a o H H ---N%*%ss''N'',/.--•,._..--------- c O g o W ----1------) D E — I 2 E. )/ t e d .92 To \ c. a ,; \ ti. > s \_ $ a cc ..,-.:., ‘-.--,- - : • • \ (.9 in C l D (I) I. 1.7, 1r ‘ / it :; �o ; 1 d .c .O o 'V c ') ti_. t m ,---. 2 - _r/� ill C t0 C _. Rp .pun uu - .c N g 2 E C I� MY ww ■ .. j I O E' CO fulf/f MU \ ',\ 1; I ( N \ C W ' ..illtl/4// ' \\. - 0 \ J ' / rte\ ■ liftiiI" w fi 2 > k'.� t o M i ir��!i i1TI> i / 0 N We )/ 1 •:i_.-- ) \\ ' / / / k r.t ;'•• / / -, ,, V ( r ....A•'-. I =Z .•....„- ,y . 4 1 I / \r-------7 J • I—..-L.___- / J 1 --- -'1:611) (Y.. "2 v_A o Ce I 53 ( 2 RA t ce E , a o v V __— - --- ... - o co �i E — - -- - - ` F10 I m Q. Cr) f's••---,.'L 1 t '<RtffR \fr# �� G1 I ----" \\IV.-CD ix ,aLtT`?`; t��i�2ill yt ,___. �``� �Jff/ 2 -/ r ' L.,/,/ nu Feb 21 06 04: 14p Terra Logics 970 667 9959 p. 2 P.O.Box 7676 Phone:970-663-7480 Loveland,Colorado 80537.0676 Logics a Fax:970-667-9959 ConstIhng,LLC -Over 20 years airflow,in Northern CwwMv- February 21,2006 WIPO,LLC Attn:Bret Larimer 1600 West Horsetooth Road Fort Collins,Colorado 80526 RE: First Addendum to an Evaluation of Proposed Onsite Wastewater System(OWS)Enhancements Falcon Ridge,PUD Weld County,Colorado TLC Job No.05-1062 Mr. Lorimer, As requested, we have prepared this addendum to ow OWS evaluation report to address the environmental impact of advance treatment OWS for the proposed subdivision. Our OWS evaluation report was prepared under Job No. 05-1062, dated October 31, 2005. This addendum was requested to provide comments of the overall environmental impact if all houses on the 38 lots would have secondary,or advance treatment systems (ATS)with nitrogen reduction. The evaluation report presents data of the Advantex® treatment system. The data indicates the following reductions over conventional OWS for properly sized and operational Advantex®treatment systems: • 97 percent decrease in biochemical oxygen demand(BODO • 94 percent decrease total suspended solids(TSS) • 60 percent decrease nitrogen(N) Based on this data, there should be an overall reduction of at least 60% of those components that will contribute to the environment if Advantex®treatment systems are installed in place of conventional OWS for all homes in the subdivision. To present another perspective, 38 homes with Advantex® treatment systems should have a similar impact to the environment, with respect to BODs,TSS and N, as 15 to 16 homes with minimum,conventional OWS. The environmental impact of the proposed homes with Advantex® treatment systems at a proposed density of one dwelling unit per 1.9 acres should be similar to a density of one dwelling unit per 4.75 acres for homes with conventional OWS. If you have any questions concerning the information provided in this report, please contact our office. Sincerely, Terra Logics Consulting,LLC r Thomas W. Finley, P.G. twf,5 copies sent email:terralogics@att.net ..l tT T_ iii- ri J a a a a i a i i i LEGEND . Existing Interceptor , ,. Future Interceptor M==M Sub-Basin Boundary i EXHIBIT t` X Sub-Basin Label K Design Point Pe s`?S © Design Points Label 30 I I Low Density Estate Single Family Residential TO BE SERVICEDBY 2Q 29 I High Density Estate Single Family Residential BOX EIDER I I I Single Famiy Residential fir SANITATION DISTRICT \ 1 ". �mu--....1 Multi-Family Residential 1 1� Central Business Distr ct f I -1,t-4,;.',',' .:..","- , General Commercial ELHNieegaihgvythibonidndrhusuootristard: ,t !—'1 Residential Mixed Use ® Parka,Open Space,Mineral Extraction&Floodplains I J 1 �.si�IQv: 3.1 I I Community Separator ® Schools , , i I I Other Public/Semi Private , ,.., „,,,, , . , I I — F �� ; , . _ , , a ' 1 A ii- .. ,,,,,,' 1 � , ' _ 1 �� VJ!_I �;, ro-1 ti Ss 01 ` 7 ,S 8 f_ 4 lli 1 1 N 1 , I# STA'TION Q., T h t[n 4 a r4 t �' , r art. ;} { fir C? ti I 4iL ' P Y Fn YIVFb 4 La] »t � $ 1 SEVERANCE POINT tire.'IIG rq }, x' \ }Qf DISCHARGE AT D ti .i� 4' data fn ' . r11' t y r�YBs `- C I1 t t t 10 a �� v4tt#. Y irr k tr ,�' 7 - 5 i t .: it ��il ■.I INi■� x ";},,' �A : .. '.. ©I L� "3,., , .II. J t - 4 f j �I�j j� F � kg 1 �•�■ � t6�i��t°TM ,�c r'ww. ,i. 3 i f u. '�1 11 51 I nchB`tss `r rw . . I .. � ip ON lip zr �1. ,4. 4. Sri ,,.... ,.‘,., , k. I ' ‘ 1 I "kb of 1 +(+�t t lS�!'+" - ._-. - - y q T` < t , 4 l � Y r i. h- 1 1{• gr i 't S j,N'c 5 u,t... .Lt 6 :to 'T WINDSOR � w WWTP TOWN OF WINDSOR • t r�. pi ' EAST SIDE SANITARY INTERCEPTOR - 2000 ` a'rs _` FIGURE 2 - LAND USE AND BASIN BOUNDARY MAP „_ _ �� SCALE 1�, .� a' a Falcon Ridge P . U . D . Estate Country Living ha . -.. ,,-; ...riiii?.40 .: - 1 _ a -- -I- - , itH ni —1/4, p Al urr a --si owir .ggia....,1 i aritts. MNYIi E.9MOO PUD �� _44\\e, % r; rial e t. iims pilh 24 Reskledal homes on mac � rr.. It VW? i Is ii 1:41Isi itita tat. . _ , r , a, 4 p pp' Hsi iimmy, : \ Otos' Ill4ritam lopitrt ii 17 _ 1p,r::.".,!. :.r....-na I� - - ice l EISIIIIII I. el I . - ,. ® f , i,: I li ; ; 71 Hwrzs� i��,`. �� ,„„,,,... mi A ` I r : -\\ _ 1 i , . \,.,_ _.: I ' r 4i . , : c ` .,.6 b T.L:1 \, ,i ill , • 1 -, i--,m- -,-. - H - ,• I FAT' ! :}. ..,.. , _ i (-- _ , : . 1 • • • i `r • !-- - .T PROPOSED PLAN Low Density Resgentlol Neighborhood Current Address: 35496 (35148) Hwy 257 arm:ma -- / I : 10 24 73 n21 le 1 j ro 0 'e ° 31 32 rI1 /----'".- ` / 20 2 / `9 79 �. CWNY'KE 344 30 /i%.\ 8 \ / 2 3I \ FALCON RIDGE P.U.D. ,. (FORMERLY POTOMAC HILLS P.UO.) II ‘21; n --- - - LAND USE AC. % OPEN SPACE / tom SSE )09) 100 /., -- LOt5 3000 535 I / ROw 010 00 L - tiw � ' OPEN SMCE 20A2 30 • Re Nrw AVERAGE LCE 9h 100 SMALLEST LC1 I.00 GKOSCENSTV 2.00°Mot :;;ii. IrALUON RIDGE P U D nI • . !'I ! / /. V- vim, , -- IfI _ �� :�-: p11' I- ' ailitLIJ1 IAilr. �� / can � I III ' . . /�'• ., •; t::� fl % �7 --) , - • a� _ . I,: tea_ ��`� .� i \.� i T •1=•- _• — 1 op op•IF — i tr- e ..i.�..o. iO t t_ •• I ^} : i : _` • � no. • - 1 :• . ''�+4-1; :31 1 -f CD \ k .-• .- -nip. caviar ROAD NO.'n ...�-_ _w- / I : ' ' -S -a ra�•nen as ' I 1, ll ' ( 11 / .II:a:IIIIQI:M•.:: IIIIMo:■::z Ida ■ISEri�g:r:.::I ■/!■■ S ■ P�■■ ■� ■�P ■■ ■ ■■■ ■ \■ ■ PO ■ PI■I mamma i ■ s ■■■ii i ■ ■ i ■ 4►i A ii sigmas, ■■■ .■ w ■ i ■■ ■.. MM. ■■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ��■■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■.. !.■ ■ ■ ■..■1 ■ "ai ii 'Vi �a i .'wi C aim waaa= i a aii.�iaai iw ■C ■■P ,k■ a..a mi■ ■...■■..o:: ■ MMmuMia'aiia'i= ii■■■■■■ ■■1 n_ a _:_I r ! 1a . MM mi'al..ww■■..:i ..■:1�■.E OM WOW_m a �■■iatai ammo ...fin ■ai ■■�. l.a• w.r v' #.■..ate m L_ ,.� ■.. . ■_. Legend o UGa BW.d. *' ' :4: aeQC sanitary Scondaly Iga I lit MILE C] DACONO � . ,� � Y. i r,'��TQmOr� OERIEOACO �j r :C 'K• . .�:„ys.ra■}�� , O FIRESTON . - �■ I .�=■.aNIMORT RIC ■■ ■■■C } ' Clr1 FREDERIC • UPT ��''�pj!11 jelling ■ �. Q■ M. ■ ■ .�■■ '< f' GILCREST • . . �r mill e� ■ ng L ..i■ �Jl. ■■a l 0 HUDSON ■ ■ I .. .,f.■ ■mow KEENESeV' Ir :Jr-. YY I�■■ au. fii■ ■ ■ 'ter C _.a. -- I( - 111 ■■■ ..■ I::... I-■i■g a. �■■ 11 KERSEY inm moan ■.. I . . it♦G■■■ O LASALLE —El" • ��■',.n _ w Elm ■.1•.r. .7� s1 .■. ammo LONGMON ~il ■�� ,ll C�-Iris PU �• mil P. CI PMLAATTTEVIL %a tom O ■ ... 're.+.A I ba� In p MUD Sound moor gm geransailli. 1i FIi` ,.. ��i* � i�a*jai ■c= ■ ; Ga; ��aii■�a ii - 1 = . ,. 1 . I ��, a l -I - 1 I' I -- 1 1 1 , / r 1♦ I y / 1 ` 1 I I j - / —.— .- ; Seve ncE r Reasons asking for a " Change of Zone" from Ag to PUD 1 . No longer productive as farm land a. Alfalfa only crop that will grow b. Lack of irrigation water ( 3 days available) c. Gross income from operations approached $ 1400 for 2004 and $ 0 for 2005 2 . This parcel is surrounded by existing PUD ' s and proposed PUD ' s 3 . PUD zoning is the only alternative which offers the flexibility necessary to achieve compatibility with surrounding neighborhoods PUD Z-463 .PUD- Z-481 PUD PD Z-606 Z. 20 � I lir j1.21f.[. IAI!?e 113484 k11941 •' lb- Ir'. L. �s• P a .tea KL r.. . ..- -__..40/0,4 }w �‘rw _ . 4 .. i Y • L L • .. M `:`4 . ... •••!.• _ • _ _ • -n f r r ; u t , • • J, , . 4 : • 0I' � 3 • 1 • • • '; r , • • kr I f :, e. •t - - . . y _ i 'l�{T_}��C _ .. '�yY '. f v)1, 1. •. Z�HZ • 1 : V tQ (�J .� 4. 1 + i ) t( wl/� 4. . ,n .f "�trafl �- . �I 11 • �q7/��i 4ilY 11 < 1 � � J.- At- ' t V , )K�! ��. + SS • .7� ! ` 1 1 �< �• � 4�r 1�1 - i . t4• %. _ .' t. 11� .,ll ai rA '.� �l 1 �Y, • J f • 4 1 I 11 'y t Supporting evidence allowing the Board to approve this proposal : Per Section 27-6-120.D. — Duties of the Board of County Commissioners. Subsections 1 -4 deal with public notice of the meeting, and these conditions have been satisfied Subsections 5.a-j. are requirements that need to be proved by applicant. This section quotes, "In making a decision on the proposed change of zone, the Board shall consider the recommendation of the Planning Commission . the facts presented at the public hearing, and the information contained in the official record... " FACTS: 1 . The Planning Commission recommended unfavorably due to questions focused on "septic systems per acre." This issue has since been addressed, resolved, and approved by the Weld County Health Department. 2. The following other facts with regard to Section 27-6-120.D.5.a-j. apply: a. This proposal inconsistent with any intergovernmental agreement in effect influencing the PUD, because is no intergovernmental agreement is in effect to date. b. The uses which would be allowed on the subject property do conform to the performance standards outlined in Article II of this chapter. (Specifically, Section 27-2-140 which states "development on public water and septic systems may have a minimum lot size of one (1) acre and an overall density of two and one-half (2-1/2) acres per septic system). Section 23-1 -50 Interpretation. - states "the word may is permissive," which validates our rights to develop as proposed. We are proposing one acre lots, and our effective density equals one (1 ) septic system per 4.75 acres, according to professional engineering studies performed by us at the request of the Health Department (Please see Terra Logics letter dated February 21 , 2006). Section 27.6-120.D.5.c (Continued) c. The uses which would be permitted are compatible with the existing development, as shown earlier in this presentation. d. Evidence of public water and adequate sewer will be made available to serve the site. (Performance standards as stated above • Section 27-2.140). e. Street and Highway facilities are obviously adequate, being located along HWY 257. In addition, any improvements to 257 required by CDOT will be installed per development agreement. f. This subsection "not applicable" due to the fact street and highway facilities are adequate. g. This subsection "not applicable" due to the fact this propery is not located in any overlay district, or commercial mineral deposit area. h. Consistency does exist between the proposed zone district uses and the specific development guide. i-j. These suasections are based upon the Boards final decision. Supporting Data in favor our Request 1 . Approximately ninety-five percent ( 95% ) of referral agencies recommend approval of this application , or have no conflicts of interest. 2 . We meet all of the requirements of Weld County Code , and policies according the PUD ordinances and zoning regulations . 3 . This proposal is consistent with , and compatible to , surrounding Weld County PUD ' s . Hello