Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20061759.tiff RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS MINUTES BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY, COLORADO JUNE 28, 2006 TAPE #2006-24 The Board of County Commissioners of Weld County,Colorado, met in regular session in full conformity with the laws of the State of Colorado at the regular place of meeting in the Weld County Centennial Center, Greeley, Colorado, June 28, 2006, at the hour of 9:00 a.m. ROLL CALL: The meeting was called to order by the Chair and on roll call the following members were present, constituting a quorum of the members thereof: Commissioner M. J. Geile, Chair Commissioner David E. Long, Pro-Tem Commissioner William H. Jerke Commissioner Robert D. Masden Commissioner Glenn Vaad Also present: County Attorney, Bruce T. Barker Acting Clerk to the Board, Elizabeth Strong Director of Finance and Administration, Barb Connolly MINUTES: Commissioner Masden moved to approve the minutes of the Board of County Commissioners meeting of June 26, 2006, as printed. Commissioner Jerke seconded the motion, and it carried unanimously. AMENDMENTS TO AGENDA: There were no amendments to the agenda. PUBLIC INPUT: Robin Perez stated she would like to appeal the decision of the Board made June 26, 2006 to deny her request for a Recorded Exemption.She stated her family is moving out of state and trying to sell their home, which is the reason they have requested a Recorded Exemption. She further stated there is a contract on a home in Wisconsin, with a closing scheduled for July 14, 2006, and the closing on the sale of their home is scheduled in August, pending the approval of the Recorded Exemption. She stated she spoke to the City of Greeley regarding its concerns and agreed to not fight annexation or new roads and came to an agreement for the easement. Bruce Barker, County Attorney, stated there is nothing in the County Code regarding appeal of a Board decision; however,according to Robert's Rules of Order a motion may be reconsidered by any member of the Board who voted in favor of the motion to deny. In response to Commissioner Jerke, Ms. Perez stated she can provide written evidence of the contract on her home at the next meeting. Chair Geile stated he would also like to see the listing agreement which states the sale of the property is contingent on the Recorded Exemption. Commissioner Jerke moved to reconsider the application for Recorded Exemption #4414. Seconded by Commissioner Vaad, the motion carried unanimously. Commissioner Vaad stated he will look closely at the City's plans at the next meeting since the incompatibility with City plans was the chief reason he was not in support of the Recorded Exemption. Commissioner Masden stated he will also scrutinize the materials for compatibility with the City plans. 2006-1759 BC0016 •J7 42-06 a legal and binding contract. In response to Chair Geile, Ms. Perez stated the closing date for the sale of her home was scheduled to be August 11, 2006. Commissioner Vaad moved to continue the request for reconsideration of Recorded Exemption#4414 to July 10,2006, at 9:00 am. Seconded by Commissioner Jerke, the motion carried unanimously. (Clerk's Note:Albert and Robin Perez submitted a written request for reconsideration, marked Exhibit A, attached hereto.) CONSENT AGENDA: Commissioner Long moved to approve the consent agenda as printed. Commissioner Masden seconded the motion, and it carried unanimously. PRESENTATIONS: RECOGNITION OF SERVICES, ACCOUNTING DEPARTMENT - CAROLYN MITCHELL: Chair Geile read the certificate into the record, recognizing Carolyn Mitchell for 15 years of service with the Accounting Department. Barb Connolly, Controller, stated Ms. Mitchell always took pride in her work and was diligent about making certain payroll was processed as timely and accurately as possible. She further stated Ms. Mitchell exercised patience with upset employees and was usually able to calm them, that her knowledge of the payroll system will be greatly missed, and she thanked her for the years she dedicated to the Department. COMMISSIONER COORDINATOR REPORTS: There were no Commissioner Coordinator Reports. WARRANTS: Ms. Connolly presented the following warrants for approval by the Board: All Funds $262,583.69 Electronic Transfers - All Funds $3,099,549.36 Commissioner Masden moved to approve the warrants as presented by Ms. Connolly. Commissioner Jerke seconded the motion, which carried unanimously. BIDS: PRESENT BIDS: No bids were presented. NEW BUSINESS: CONSIDER CONSULTANT AGREEMENT FOR MIGRANT/SEASONAL HEAD START PROGRAM AND AUTHORIZE CHAIR TO SIGN - CATHY LOESCH: Walt Speckman, Director of Human Services, stated this agreement is for a contract with the Migrant/Seasonal Head Start Program. In response to Chair Geile, Mr. Speckman stated Cathy Loesch will work will special needs children and their parents providing understanding of their rights and responsibilities, completing and submitting appropriate forms, working with the School Districts,and evaluating work. Commissioner Long moved to approve said agreement and authorize the Chair to sign. Seconded by Commissioner Masden, the motion carried unanimously. CONSIDER TEMPORARY CLOSURE OF WCR 50 BETWEEN WCRS 59 AND 61: Frank Hempen, Jr., Director of Public Works, stated the temporary closure, for the purpose of replacing Bridge 50/59A will commence on July 5, 2006, and end no later than August 18, 2006. In response to Commissioner Jerke, Mr. Hempen stated the bridge is over Box Elder Creek and the project will not interrupt irrigation. Commissioner Jerke moved to approve said closure. Seconded by Commissioner Masden, the motion carried unanimously. Minutes, June 28, 2006 2006-1759 Page 2 BC0016 CONSIDER TEMPORARY CLOSURE OF WCR 41 (1ST AVENUE) BETWEEN WCRS 64 (O STREET) AND 62 (C STREET): Mr. Hempen stated the closure is requested based on an application received from GLH Contruction. He stated the closure will be for a six-day period between July 10, 2006, and August 21, 2006, for the purpose of constructing a new section of sewer line that serves Swift and Company. He further stated construction will take three to four days and connecting pipes to the old sewer lines will require one to two days. GLH has agreed to post message boards in advance of the closure. In response to Chair Geile, Mr. Hempen stated this is a forced main specifically for Swift, and part of the line either has failed or is about to fail. Responding to Commissioner Jerke, he stated the facilities are on 8th Avenue. Commissioner Vaad moved to approve said closure. Seconded by Commissioner Jerke, the motion carried unanimously. CONSIDER NONEXCLUSIVE LICENSE AGREEMENT FOR THE UPGRADE AND MAINTENANCE OF WCR 14 AND AUTHORIZE CHAIR TO SIGN - EVELYN YURK : Don Carroll, Department of Public Works, stated the Nonexclusive License Agreement is for upgrades and maintenance of Weld County Road 55. He stated the Department has contacted the adjacent property owner, there is 60 feet of right-of-way available, and the road is in good condition. Commissioner Jerke moved to approve said agreement and authorize the Chair to sign. Seconded by Commissioner Masden, the motion carried unanimously. CONSIDER APPLICATION FOR A TEMPORARY ASSEMBLY OF MORE THAN 350 PERSONS ON OCTOBER 14, 2006 - NICK SEKICH: Mr. Barker stated Nick Sekich is not present and it would be appropriate to continue this and the following item and the next to July 5, 2006. In response to Commissioner Jerke, Commissioner Vaad stated he has been in communication with Mr. Sekich and the event is for a Sugarbeet Festival, similar to a Farm Show or Hay Days, and is across the road from a major sugarbeet receiving station. He further stated the Sekich family tried to organize this event last year and ran out of time, but there is a lot of support for the event, including the Mead Chamber of Commerce. In response to Chair Geile, Mr. Barker stated the Sheriffs Office has expressed concern regarding the number of cars that will utilize Weld County Road 13 and State Highway 66. Chair Geile stated the Board could approve the request and ask that Mr. Sekich work out the issue with the Sheriffs Office. Craig Emil, Assistant County Attorney, stated Mr. Sekich is also requesting the bond be waived, since the event is being held on his property. In response to Chair Geile, Mr. Emil stated the purpose of the bond is to ensure that clean up occurs. Commissioner Vaad stated the Sekich family has a great reputation for taking care of their property and if any debris blew into another area he is confident they would take care of it. In response to Chair Geile, Mr. Barker explained the following item involves getting permission from local and state authorities to serve alcohol. Commissioner Vaad moved to approve said application and waive the bond requirement. Seconded by Commissioner Jerke, the motion carried unanimously. CONSIDER APPLICATION FOR A SPECIAL EVENTS PERMIT AND AUTHORIZE CHAIR TO SIGN - MEAD AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: CommissionerJerke moved to approve said application and authorize the Chair to sign. Seconded by Commissioner Long, the motion carried unanimously. CONSIDER RESOLUTION RE: DUST BLOWING COMPLAINT-JUAN RAMIREZ/MARIA DEL CARMEN: Mr. Emil stated notification of the hearing was sent to Juan Ramirez and Maria Del Carmen via certified mail, but evidence of receipt has not been forwarded to the office. He stated Nick Hoban, West Greeley Conservation District, recommended the County take care of the issues that he identified and that have not been resolved by the property owners. He stated there are 10 to 20 acres that still need to be roughened with a chisel plow, and a wooden lath snow fence needs to be erected to ensure the soil stays on the property. In response to Chair Geile, Mr. Emil stated the Board's approval is necessary in order to use County funds to hire a third party to bring the property into compliance. He further stated there is a provision in which reimbursement can be sought by the County in the amount of $15.00 per acre; however, the reimbursement amount will not cover the entire cost. In response to Chair Geile, Mr. Emil Minutes, June 28, 2006 2006-1759 Page 3 BC0016 stated the animals have been moved to a contained area, some of the property is recovering and has new growth; however, there is a portion of the property that may not recover. In response to Commissioner Jerke, Mr. Emil explained State Statute mandates that the County is only able to seek reimbursement of the actual cost or upto $15.00 per acre, whichever is less. In response to Chair Geile, Mr. Barker stated the reimbursement issue is not something the County can address in the Charter because the authorization for the action is through State statute. Commissioner Long moved to approve said resolution. Commissioner Jerke seconded the motion. Mr. Barker stated the Board needs to decide on authorization to do the work and to collect the reimbursement. Commissioner Long and Commissioner Jerke modified their motions to include both additions, and the motion carried unanimously. CONSIDER RESOLUTION RE: AUTHORIZE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS TO CONVENE AS A BOARD OF EQUALIZATION FOR CALENDAR YEAR 2006: CommissionerJerke moved to approve said resolution. Seconded by Commissioner Masden, the motion carried unanimously. CONSIDER AMENDMENT TO UTILITIES COORDINATION ADVISORY COMMITTEE BYLAWS: Mr. Barker stated the Utilities Coordinating Advisory Committee has approved the changes.Commissioner Masden moved to approve said amendment. Seconded by Commissioner Jerke, the motion carried unanimously. CONSIDER AMENDMENT TO BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT BYLAWS: Mr. Barker stated the purpose of the amendment is to bring the bylaws into conformance with the Weld County Charter provision which was amended last fall. Commissioner Masden moved to approve said amendment. Seconded by Commissioner Long, the motion carried unanimously. RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES: The resolutions were presented and signed as listed on the consent agenda. No Ordinances were approved. Let the minutes reflect that the above and foregoing actions were attested to and respectfully submitted by the Acting Clerk to the Board. There being no further business, this meeting was adjourned at 9:57 a.m. � . ` BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS I ♦ WELD COUNTY, COLORADO /4. 4/ ATTEST: t. �'1` „owl 1 vim' EXCUSED DATE OF APPROVAL tt ��� M. J eile, Chair Weld County Clerk to the Boa : .;;,.. • BY. , David E. Long, Pro-Tem Dep Clerk the Board William � H. Jerke Robe D. Masden Glenn aad Minutes, June 28, 2006 2006-1759 Page 4 BC0016 June 26,2006 Weld County Commissioners 950 10th Street Greeley, CO 80631 Re: Proposed Recorded Exemption on 24 Acres, aka 1330 71S`Avenue, Greeley, Co. Dear County Commissioners, We are asking the county commissioners to please reconsider our request for a recorded exemption on our property at 1330 71S`Avenue. We have a job related transfer out of state and my husband is presently commuting from Wisconsin. We have signed a contract on a home in Wisconsin that is scheduled to close on July 14, 2006,and have a contract to sell our home at 1330 71st Avenue,pending the outcome of the Recorded Exemption. Our entire 24 acres are listed with Orr Land Company for sale but,three different Real Estate firms all agreed that the house should be sold separate from the balance of the land for future development. The denial of the Recorded Exemption has placed a great financial burden on our family to close on our home in Wisconsin without executing the sale of our home on 71g Avenue. For sixteen years we have left our property in an agriculture setting and managed it with the utmost care as requested by the county commissioners in 1990 when we purchased the property. Now we are requesting your cooperation to help us in making our property more marketable by granting us this request. The city has two main oppositions to this Recorded Exemption request. The first is access,which can be remedied by utilizing the existing access to the property until the 16th Street roadway is constructed. The second opposition is the water, which could be serviced by a domestic well until which time development occurs. By granting the Recorded Exemption we can accomplish our moving objectives and the city can have everything it needs for future development of this area. Your reconsideration into this matter is greatly appreciated. Sincerely, Albert and Robin Perez C 6-411-04 fowl Hello