HomeMy WebLinkAbout20061959 REFERRAL LIST --
Name: Eagle View Farms LLC Case# PF-1090
County Towns &Cities Fire Districts
_Attorney _Ault _Ault F-1
z Health Department __Berthoud _Berthoud F-2 $$$
_Extension Office _Brighton Briggsdale F-24
_Emergency Mgt Office - Ed Herring _Dacono _Brighton F-3
z Sheriffs Office z Eaton z Eaton F-4
z Public Works _Erie _Fort Lupton F-5
_Housing Authority _Evans Galeton F-6
_
_Airport Authority _Firestone _Hudson F-7
z Building Inspection _Fort Lupton _Johnstown F-8
z Code Compliance_S.-Ann_N-Beth _Frederick _LaSalle F-9
_Kim Ogle (Landscape Plans) _Garden City _Mountain View F-10
_Lin (Addressing Change of Zone) _Gilcrest _Milliken F-11
_Ambulance Services z Greeley _Nunn F-12
_Grover _Pawnee F-22
State _Hudson _Platteville F-13
Div._ of Water Resources _Johnstown _Platte Valley F-14
_Geological Survey _Keenesburg _Poudre Valley F-15
_Department of Health _Kersey _Raymer F-2
z Department of Transportation _LaSalle _Southeast Weld F-16
_Historical Society _Lochbuie _Union Colony F-20
_Water Conservation Board _Longmont _Wiggins F-18
_Oil&Gas Conservation Commission _Mead _Windsor/Severance F-17
_Milliken
Division of Wildlife _New Raymer
_South Hwy 66 (Loveland) _Northglenn
z North Hwy 66 (Greeley) _Nunn
Division of Minerals/Geology _Pierce Commissioner
_Platteville _
Soil Conservation Districts _Severance
_Big Thompson/ FTC _Thornton
_Boulder Valley/Longmont _Windsor Bonanza Creek
_Brighton/SE Weld Operating CO
Centennial Counties 4900 California Ave
_Greeley/West Greeley _Adams Ste. 350,Tower B
_Platte Valley _Boulder Bakersfield CA 93309
_West Adams _Broomfield
_Little Thompson _Larimer
Federal Government Agencies Other
_US Army Corps of Engrs z School District RE-2
USDA-APHIS Vet Service _Central Colo. Water Conservancy
_Federal Aviation Admin (Structures -zN. Weld county Water Dist
over 200 ft or w/in 20000 ft of Pub z Ditch Company, Olgivy Ditch
Airport _Art Elmquist(MUD Area) - Info Only
_Federal Communications Comm
2006-1959
1 How
' ' ' Cad\ `1S cC"vSLsr ' ° s o� Wl� CILIc
coaa b« ( Ncfi cokA( --'C - as I.,owr.
0. Qs C��S ) fs , �; , c�, Ceti
�mcti�
� �' (A)0-'fir.
--- (11',4r----H MEMORANDUM
TO: Chris Gathman, Dept. of Planning Services DATE: Sept. 25, 2006
' FROM: Drew Scheltinga, P. E., Public Works Department k, c
I�` �. Eagle �_. '
SUBJECT: PF-1090 Ea le View Farms, LLC 2n° i{�a�4a16 F +isMV U .
COLORADO GREELEY OFFirr '
pp SEP 2 7 2006
The Weld County Public Works Department has reviewed the second submit[i&E aV , "`1
t...,..„#
application materials. These materials are not dated but were received at the Public Works
office on September 15, 2006. Also, I met with Brad Keirnes, at the site of the development on
September 20, 2006. Information obtained in that meeting is reflected in the following
comments. Comments made during this stage of the review process may not be all-inclusive,
as revised materials will have to be submitted and other concerns or issues will arise during
further review. The final plat shall not be recorded until all issues in this memorandum have
been resolved.
Final Plat:
Septic envelopes are shown on the recorded change of zone plat and the construction drawings
— and are not appropriate on the final plat. The septic envelopes and legend should be removed.
"Setbacks for the oil and gas facilities have been shown on Lots 20 and 21 but have not been
located or dimensioned. The center of the 150' and 200' radii should be located by dimension
on the record plat.
—l`he Property Owner's Certificate shown on the final plat is for a recorded exemption and does
not contain dedication language for rights-of-way or easements. The Certification of Dedication,
Ownership and Maintenance shown in the Appendix of Chapter 24, Subdivisions, of the Weld
County Code shall be used for the owner's certification.
/The entrance island is called out on the final plat but not shown and dimensioned.
./A Ditch Easement Agreement, dated February 22, 2006, between Ridgeview Farms, LLC and
the Ogilvy Irrigating & Land Company has been executed. The east line of the easement is
shown on the final plat as a dashed line but not but dimensioned nor is the instrument creating
the easement called out. The easement agreement shall be recorded and called out as such on
the record plat and dimensioned.
S-' There is a proposed Exclusive Pipeline Right-of-way Grant between Ridgeview Farms, LLC,
and Duke Energy that is shown in Outlot A. The Grant shall be executed, recorded and called
out as such on the final plat.
Page 1 of 3
M:\PLANNING-DEVELOPMENT REVIENA3-Final Plat(PF,MF,MJF)\PF-1090 Eagle VievA2nd Final Plat Review 9-25-06.DOC
Irrigation Companies:
Concerns for erosion and the stability of the Ogilvy Ditch have not been resolved. These issues
were discussed in detail at my meeting on September 15, 2006, with Brad Keirnes. Mr. Keirnes
said he would address the issue with the Board of Weld County Commissioners at the final plat
hearing.
Written approval of final construction plans and the final plat from the Ogilvy Ditch must be
provided.
Construction Plans:
Stabilization of the Ogilvy Ditch is not shown in the construction plans or proposed in
conjunction with this development. If the Board of Weld County Commissioners accepts a
solution that does not include slope stabilization the hazard of an unstable vertical bank
adjacent to a residential development still exists. In this case, the east line of the Ogilvy Ditch
easement should be fenced.
At our meeting On September 15, 2006, Brad Keirnes provided information regarding the
✓existing and proposed perforated underdrain pipes. There are two existing pipes that drain farm
ground east of WCR 35 that have been in place for a number of years, one on the north end of
the development and one thru the center.
On the north end, the proposed 6" perforated underdrain pipe shown on the plans is not
intended to control ground water but to replace the existing drain that is not functioning;
therefore, it is not owned and should not be maintained by the homeowner's association. The
proposed drain should be replaced in an exclusive easement in outlot A and the ownership of
the drain shown on the record plat and in the construction plans. Construction details of the
underdrain, such as material specifications, depth, trench width, backfill materials, cleanouts,
and discharge treatment, must be shown in the plans.
The location and ownership of the existing drain that runs through the center of the development
shall be shown on the record plat and on the construction plans. If the exact location is not
known, an approximate location should be shown and noted as such.
The owner of the underdrain system must indicate in writing that the relocation, construction and
easements are acceptable.
CYNo information has been provided that Duke Energy accepts berming and a trail on their
easement. The proposed Exclusive Pipeline Right-of-Way Grant states,"...Grantor agrees not
to build ... structures or engineering works on the herein granted right-of-way that will interfere
with the normal operation and maintenance of said line."
Construction details for the 5' trail shall be shown in the plans. Specifications shall be provided
for the proposed Polymer Aggregate Mix. The cost to construct the trail is not shown in the
improvements agreement.
Page 2 of 3
M:IPLANNING-DEVELOPMENT REVIEWt3Final Rat(PF,MF,MJF)1PF-1090 Eagle Vie\2ntl Final Plat ReNew 9-25-06.DOC
Drainage:
A revised Final Drainage and Erosion Control Report has been submitted by North Star Design,
dated September 12, 2006. Attached is a second review memorandum from Brian Varrella,
P. E., of the Weld County Public Works Department, dated September 22, 2006. The items in
Mr. Varrella's review shall be addressed.
At our meeting On September 15, 2006, Brad Keirnes indicated the original plan was to deliver
irrigation water through the swale on the western side of the development. This plan has been
changed because of the concern over saturating the soil in close proximity to the Ogilvy Ditch.
Mr. Keirnes said the swale is now intended to direct storm water to the detention pond. The
original plans showed an 18" culvert taking water from an irrigation check structure into the
swale. This culvert is still shown in the plans and only the reference to the irrigation check
structure has been removed. If this culvert is not required for storm water conveyance it should
be removed from the plans.
Attachment: Drainage Review by Brian Varrella, P. E., dated September 22, 2006
PC: PF-1090 Eagle View Farms, LLC
Email & Original: Chris Gathman, Dept. of Planning Services
PC by Post Owner: Brad Keirnes, Eagle View Farms, LLC
Email & PC by Post Applicant: Robb Casseday, Casseday Creative Designs
PC by Post Engineer: Patricia Kroetch, P. E., North Star Design
Page 3 of 3
M9PLANNING-DEVELOPMENT REVlE 3-Final Plat(PF,MF,MJF)\PF-1090 Eagle Vew2nd Final Plat Review 9-25-06DOC
sti,H6 MEMORANDUM
TO: Drew Scheltinga, PP..E.,,Public Works Dept. DATE: 22-September-2006
I
I I D C FROM: Brian K. Varrella, P.E.,Public Works Dept.
COLORADO SUBJECT: PZ-1090 Eagle View Farms PUD(Final Plan)
Weld County Public Works Department has reviewed this Final Plan request. Comments made during this
phase of the subdivision process may not be all-inclusive, as other concerns or issues may arise during the
remaining application process.
Drainage Comments
❑ Public Works received a Final Drainage and Erosion Control Report for Eagle View Farms PUD(PZ-1090)
on September 15, 2006,herein referred to as the final drainage report. The report was submitted by Patrica
Kroetch, P.E. #31306, and Shane Boyle, P.E. #40185,of North Star Design, Inc. The report is dated
September 12, 2006
❑ The Final Drainage and Erosion Control Report shall not be approved by Public Works without a wet-stamp,
signature, and date from a registered P.E. licensed to practice in the state of Colorado. This was requested in
the Drainage Review Memorandum from Public Works dated June 28,2006,but the latest submittal has not
been stamped, signed, or dated by a registered P.E.
❑ The final construction plan documents shall not be approved by Public Works without a wet-stamp, signature,
and date from a registered P.E. licensed to practice in the state of Colorado.
Unresolved Drainage Items—the following items were identified in the Drainage Review Memorandum
dated June 28, 2006, and have not been resolved. Public Works requests the applicant fully resolve these
items and re-submit the drainage and erosion control study for a full review.
❑ The applicant must provide for safe conveyance of offsite flows through the proposed development site as
described in Weld County Storm Drainage Criteria dated February 2006.
o All irrigation ditches shall be assumed to be full at the time of peak stormwater runoff,and will not
intercept and divert stormwater runoff.
o Stormwater runoff cannot be discharged into the Ogilvy Ditch without written consent from the ditch
company.
❑ Revegetation of all disturbed earth shall comply with all standards defined in the Revegetation section of the
Weld County Storm Drainage Criteria dated February 2006.
New Drainage Items:
ci Please address all redlines in the final drainage report and construction plan documents.
❑ The final drainage report must be bound at the time of submittal. Loose-leaf drainage reports will not be
accepted by Public Works.
❑ Please remove the"preliminary, not for construction."note from the title block of all construction plan
sheets.
❑ The offsite property immediately adjacent to the northeast corner of Eagle View Farms will discharge to the
proposed site. The original request from the drainage review memorandum dated June 28,2006 included all
offsite areas. The applicant must provide safe conveyance of these flows through their site.
Page 1 of 2
❑ Page 3,paragraph 2 of the final drainage report states "this development is not affecting the outfall or runoff
contributing to the outfall, any bank stabilization at this outfall point is to be completed by the ditch company
and not the developer. " In the same paragraph,the report notes that the ditch is unstable at the outfall point
and there is a potential for erosion during stormwater runoff events.
o The development is concentrating flow to the southwest corner of the property and proposing to release
stormwater discharge to the Ogilvey Ditch. Remediation for erosion created by the point discharge from
the development must be provided by the applicant at this time.
o Ogilvey Ditch representatives must approve the quantity and nature of stormwater releases to their ditch
in writing. A copy of any written agreements between the Ogilvey Ditch and the applicant must be
provided in the final drainage report. See the note from the June 28, 2006 review memorandum
reproduced in the previous section of this memorandum.
❑ Please increase the Type-II bedding under all riprap to a thickness of 12 inches.
❑ All culverts were analyzed using UD-Culvert, assuming an inlet condition of groove-end projecting with a Ke
value of 0.2. It appears that all proposed pipes will have flared inlets at the upstream and downstream end.
Please select a more appropriate inlet condition to reflect the flared end section with a Ke value of 0.4 to 0.5.
❑ The HW/D ratio for culverts at Storm 10, Lot 4, Lot 6, and Lot 11 are too high. All culverts must maintain an
HW/D ratio less than or equal to 1.5.
❑ Please provide evidence that the proposed 18" RCP at the entrance to the subdivision will not impair flow in
the WCR 35 roadside ditch. Please support the design discharge of 12 cfs with supporting calculations.
❑ Please indicate the property limits of the proposed subdivision on the FEMA FIRM map provided in the final
drainage report appendix.
❑ The underdrain on the north edge of the proposed property(near SH 392)is to be "designed by others"
according to the utility plans. Please identify who will design this underdrain, when the design will be
completed, who will construct the underdrain, and when construction will be completed.
The applicant shall address the comments listed above during this Final Plan review process. Comments
made during this stage of the review process may not be all-inclusive,as revised materials will have to be
submitted and other concerns or issues will arise during farther review. The review process will continue
only when all appropriate elements have been submitted. Any issues of concern must be resolved with the
Public Works Department prior to recording the Final Plat.
Page 2 of 2 __
t_ 4 , MEMORANDUM
TO: Chris Gathman, Dept. of Planning Services DATE: June 28, 2696
' FROM: Drew Scheltinga, P. E., Public Works Department ,K c �r
I�`P� 14; " �cc�
SUBJECT: PF-1090 Eagle View Farms, LLC (Final Plat) � ( CA.
COLORADO (� f g��
Oa ra) CP CPI
01
The Weld County Public Works Department has reviewed the final plat application materia ?•;)*`'
Comments made during this stage of the review process may not be all-inclusive, as revise
materials will have to be submitted and other concerns or issues will arise during further review.
The final plat shall not be recorded until all issues in this memorandum have been resolved.
Final Plat:
Septic envelopes are shown on the recorded change of zone plat and the construction drawings
and are not appropriate on the final plat. The septic envelopes and legend should be removed.
The land use designation table and zoning classification table should be removed.
With the exception of a very small portion on Lot 11, the sight distance triangles are located in
the rights-of-way and do not restrict the use on the lots; therefore, they should be removed from
the record plat.
In the northeast corner of Lot 1 there is a reference to relocating a gas meter which is a
construction note and is not appropriate on the final plat. The note should be removed.
Setbacks for the oil and gas facilities shown on Lots 20 and 21 are restrictions on the land and
should be shown. The center of the 150' and 200' radii should be located by dimension on the
record plat.
There is no right-of-way dedication language on the plat. Right-of-way on WCR 35 and must be
dedicated to the public and the dedication language placed on the plat. The reference to the
City of Greeley referral should be removed.
Although Eagle View Farms is intended to be a gated community there is still a need for access
for utility providers, service providers and for emergency services. The internal road rights-of-
way shall be dedicated to the public and the dedication language placed on the plat.
The entrance island and the cul-de-sac landscape islands shall be shown, dimensioned and
called out as outlots in order for the homeowners association to have access for maintenance.
There is an agreement between the applicant and the New Cache La Poudre Irrigating
Company, recorded under reception number 3375676, which establishes a right-of-way in
Outlot A and affects the use of the land. The right-of-way shall be shown on the record plat.
Page 1 of 4
M:\PLANNING-DEVELOPMENT REVIEWU-Final Plat(PF,MF,MJF)lPF-1090 Eagle View\Final Plat Review 6-28-06.DOC
The west line of Eagle View rarms is called out as the East line of the Ogilvy Ditch per
Reception No. 3184094. There is a second dashed line called out as Ogilvy Ditch Easement.
Clarification is required. If there is to be a dedication of an easement to the Ogilvy Ditch
Company there must be specific dedication language on the plat. Approval of construction
plans by Weld County and the Ogilvy Ditch Company are likely to require additional easement.
There is an exclusive easement to Duke Energy shown in Outlot A. The recording information
for that easement shall be indicated.
Irrigation Companies:
There is a requirement In the Board of County Commissioners zone change resolution, in
sections 6 C and D, that, at the time of final plan submission, the applicant submit written
evidence that, "ditch activities have adequately been incorporated into the design of the site", by
both the Cache La Poudre Irrigation Company and the Ogilvy Ditch Company.
Form letters, signed by both ditch companies, have been provided indicating that they have
reviewed and approved the Landscape Plan dated May 23, 2006. The New Cache La Poudre
Irrigating Company makes their approval subject to the trail being removed from the utility
easement. Approving the landscape plan does not adequately address the requirement of the
zone change resolution cited above.
Of major concern is the Ogilvy Ditch. Head cutting, erosion and slope stability in the ditch are
major concerns when residential development is proposed adjacent to the ditch. Although
remediation is called for in the Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Report by Terracon, dated
August 24, 2005, nothing is proposed in the construction plans. A new point discharge is
proposed from the retention pond that poses a serious erosion potential. Relocation of the
existing access road is shown in the construction plans on top of the berm adjacent to the
proposed detention and irrigation storage ponds and appears to go outside the Ogilvy Ditch
easement, which is not clearly delineated. The new ditch access road is proposed to be shared
with Eagle View Farms' trail system. These issues must be acknowledged and the proposed
construction approved by the Ogilvy Ditch Company.
Written approval of final construction plans and the final plat, from both irrigation companies,
must be provided.
Construction Plans:
The Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Report by Terracon, dated August 24, 2005,
identifies the stability problems in the Ogilvy Ditch (referred to in the report as the Seeley Lake
inlet) and the undermining of the concrete structure at the northwest corner of the property.
There are recommendations on page 7 of the report which include regarding the slopes,
directing surface drainage, construction setbacks, debris removal, and vegetation of slopes,
riprap and dewatering systems. None of these recommendations have been included in the
construction plans. A final geotechnical report that specifically analyzes the stability of the
Ogilvy Ditch slopes addresses erosion and provides specific designs must be provided. The
designs in the final geotechnical report must be incorporated in the construction plans.
Existing topography for the Ogilvy Ditch is shown south of the property but not adjacent to the
development where the information is critical. Topography covering all of the Ogilvy Ditch must
be shown on the grading plan.
Page 2 of 4
M'.\PLANNING-DEVELOPMENT REVIEW\3Final Flat(PF,MF,MJF)\PF-1090 Eagle ViewlFinal Plat Renew 6-28-06.DOC
The report also identifies ground water issues and recommends basement restrictions. Note
number 2 on the grading plans is appropriate; however, the lots that are affected by ground
water should be identified and the ground water elevation in the report shown on the plans.
A proposed 6" perforated underdrain pipe is shown in the utility plans along the north line of lots
1 thru 7 and is shown to daylight into the Ogilvy Ditch. Construction details of the underdrain,
such as material specifications, depth, trench width, backfill materials, cleanouts, and discharge
treatment, must be shown in the plans. The Ogilvy Ditch Company must accept, in writing,
installation of the drain and discharge from the drain into their easement. If this underdrain is
intended to mitigate ground water problems and address basement restrictions, a final
geotechnical report which provides a detailed analysis and design must be provided.
The utility plans show the 20' exclusive easement to Duke Energy as a proposed utility
easement. The easement must be correctly called out on all sheets.
The grading and landscape plans show extensive berming, landscaping and parts of the 5' trail
within the 20' exclusive easement to Duke Energy. This construction can not be allowed in an
exclusive easement. Even if Duke Energy would allow the construction, it is only a matter of
time when maintenance or replacement of Duke's gas line will occur and the homeowners
would loose or be responsible for replacing the landscaping.
The 5' trail is shown on all plan sheets but the material the trail will be constructed with is not
clear. On sheet 8, the ditch access road relocation calls out concrete but not a thickness.
Construction details for the 5' trail are required. The cost to construct the trail is not shown in
the improvements agreement.
Relocation of the Ogilvy Ditch access road is shown on sheet 4, utility plan and sheet 8, grading
plan. As stated above in the final plat review comments, the Ogilvy Ditch easement must be
clarified. The easement is very difficult to see on sheets 4 and 8 must be shown clearly
delineated. There is a significant portion of the relocated road that appears to be outside the
easement and on Outlot A. Additional easement must be shown and dedicated. The Ogilvy
Ditch Company must indicate in writing that the relocation and easement is acceptable.
The grading plan calls for a berm up to 5' high to be constructed at the edge of the Ogilvy Ditch.
The berm creates the retention and irrigation ponds. The berm also has the relocated ditch
access road and trail on top. As cited above, the Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Report
points out the ditch banks are unstable. This design issue must also be addressed in a final
geotechnical report and designs reflected in the plans.
A typical lot grading detail showing how drainage is to be directed away from houses shall be
shown.
Sheet 11, Street Plan and Profiles shows the entrance and school bus pullout but does not
show dimensions. The geometry for this construction must be shown. The taper for the pullout
appears to be approximately 1:1 but should be show as 30:1.
There is a typical section shown on all the Street Plan and Profile sheets. The typical sections
need to be revised to show 3%" of Hot Bituminous Paving Grading SX and 6" of Aggregate
Base Course Class 6 called for in the Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Report. The
culverts at driveways shall be revised to show a 15" minimum. The construction estimate
provided with the improvements agreement used 3" of HBP. The estimate must be revised.
Page 3 of 4
M\PLANNING-DEVELOPMENT REVIEWI3.FInal Rat(PF,MF,MJF)\PF-1090 Eagle View1Final Plat Review 6-28-06.DOC
There are to be cuts and fills in the streets of up to 5' and extensive site grading. A note shall
be put on the plans as follows, "After street grading has been completed but prior to placing any
aggregate base course, a final geotechnical report shall be provided that certifies that the soils
exposed by cutting and the soils placed in fills are properly wetted and compacted and that
those soils are compatible with the pavement design in the Preliminary Geotechnical
Engineering Report by Terracon, dated August 24, 2005."
Stop signs and street name signs are required at all intersections and shall be shown on the
construction plans. A note shall be placed on the plans "Manufacture and instillation of signs
shall meet the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices."
Drainage:
A Final Drainage and Erosion Control Report has been submitted by North Star Design, dated
May 25, 2006. Attached is a review memorandum from Brian Varrella, P. E., of the Weld
County Public Works Department, dated June 29, 2006. A revised drainage report and plans
addressing all of Mr. Varrella's comments is required.
Improvements Agreements:
Improvements agreements for both on-site and of-site have been submitted and are acceptable
as to form and the construction estimates appear to be reasonable. Because there will be
revisions to the construction plans, a detailed cost review will not be performed until final plans
have been approved.
The on-site and off-site improvements agreements must be approved by the Board of County
Commissioners prior to recording the final plat.
Street and Drainage Facilities Maintenance:
The Board of County Commissioners zone change resolution section 2.D requires internal
roadways of gated communities to be maintained by the Homeowners' Association. The on-site
improvements agreement that has been submitted is for private maintenance. In the submitted
Declaration of Covenants, Article 2— Definitions, section 2.1.9 "Common Elements", storm
drainage improvements are included but not streets. Street maintenance responsibility by the
Homeowners' Association shall be included in the Covenants.
Attachment: Drainage Review by Brian Varrella, P. E., dated June 29, 2006
PC: PF-1090 Eagle View Farms, LLC
Email & Original: Chris Gathman, Dept. of Planning Services
PC by Post Owner: Brad Keirnes, Eagle View Farms, LLC
PC by Post Applicant: Robb Casseday, Casseday Creative Designs
PC by Post Engineer: Patricia Kroetch, P. E., North Star Design
Page 4 of 4
M:\PLANNING-DEVELOPMENT REVIEW\3-Final Plat(PF,MF,MJF)\PF-1090 Eagle ViexvFinal Plat Review 6-28-06.DOC
MEMORANDUM
' TO: Drew Scheltinga, P.E. Pub c rks Dept. DATE: 28-June-2006
Q FROM: Brian K. Varrell�Pu�s Dept.
COLORADO SUBJECT: PZ-1090 Eagle View Farms PUD(Final Plan)
Weld County Public Works Department has reviewed this Final Plan request. Comments made during this
phase of the subdivision process may not be all-inclusive, as other concerns or issues may arise during the
remaining application process.
Drainage Comments
❑ Public Works received a Final Drainage and Erosion Control Report for Eagle View Farms PUD (PZ-1090)
on June 13, 2006. The report was submitted by Patrica Kroetch, P.E., of North Star Design, Inc., and is dated
May 25, 2006
❑ The Final Drainage and Erosion Control Report must be wet-stamped, signed, and dated by a registered P.E.
licensed to practice in the state of Colorado.
Final Plan Drainage Items—the following items must be resolved prior to scheduling the Weld County Board of
County Commissioners final plat hearing:
❑ Please add the following note to the text of the Final Drainage Report and Final Plat: "Weld County will not
be responsible for the maintenance of drainage related areas."
❑ Please address all redline comments in the drainage report and on the construction plan drawing contained
therein.
❑ Please address all items included in the drainage review checklist attached to this memorandum.
❑ Proposed development must provide for safe conveyance of offsite flows through the proposed development
site as described in Weld County Storm Drainage Criteria dated February 2006.
o All irrigation ditches shall be assumed to be full at the time of peak stormwater runoff, and will not
intercept and divert stormwater runoff.
o Stormwater runoff cannot be discharged into Ogilvy ditch without written consent of the ditch company.
o State Highway 392 is likely to be overtopped in a 100-year event. Therefore, SH 392 shall not be
considered a diversion feature that intercepts offsite flows from the north.
❑ Please transfer all drainage and erosion control information on Sheet 10 of 15 to Sheets 6-9 of 15. The title
for Sheets 6-9 of 15 shall be changed to "Drainage, Erosion Control, and Grading Plan."
❑ A project vicinity map shall be included as a figure in the drainage report,clearly identifying the borders of
the proposed development,bounding roads and properties,water features,north arrow, and approximate
scale, as per Weld County CODE Sec. 27-9-10(I).
❑ Please include a discussion of the detention pond in the drainage report, and discuss the proposed steady pool.
Please include a detention pond outlet structure and emergency overflow details in the construction plan
drawings.
o Detail must be provided for the outlet structure of the detention pond and how it will discharge to the
ditch without eroding the channel.
o An outlet structure must be designed to capture the 10-year water quality volume as per Weld County
Storm Drainage Criteria.
o All CDPHE regulations and State of Colorado water rights regulations must be observed if the detention
pond has a steady pool (retention) for non-potable irrigation purposes.
Page 1 of 3 .
o The emergency overflow spillway shall be located on the drainage plan sheet(s) and included as part of
the proposed contours.
• The depth of flow out of the spillway shall be 6 inches or less.
• A cutoff wall is required to prevent possible breach during the major(100-year) storm event.
• The spillway shall have adequate erosion protection on the upstream face, overflow crest, and
downstream face to prevent erosion during operation. Please provide engineering calculations in the
drainage report index.
❑ Please provide appropriate erosion control at pipe outlets, overflow areas, channel bends, high shear stress
channels and swales, or any other areas requiring erosion control. Design calculations must be provided to
support the selection of any and all erosion control measures, and must show stable channel conditions prior
to the establishment of vegetation.
o Please add rock riprap protection at all culvert outlets for the final drainage plans,and include rock size
(D50)and apron limits(length, width,and thickness). Please utilize UD&FCD methods, and include all
design calculations and/or spreadsheets in the report appendix.
o A termination detail is required for rock riprap protection. Please specify geotextile product, or approved
other, and support the design choice with engineering calculations in the drainage report appendix.
o All proposed erosion control fabric (ECF)must be accompanied by appropriate termination details to
prevent uplift by water and mowing operations. Selected ECF measures must be identified by product
name and number or approved equal, and shall be fully supported by manufacturer specifications and
installation procedures/drawings/details.
o Manning's-n values for ECF-lined swales must match manufacturer recommended n-values for depths
calculated. Please show hydraulic conditions with and without ECF, and clearly indicate both conditions
on sheets included in the appendix.
o The top of the ECF must terminate above the 100-year energy grade line (EGL) on all swales where Fr>
0.8.
o A standard detail sheet for all temporary and permanent drainage and erosion control features must be
provided as part of the construction plan set. This sheet shall be included as part of the drainage report
with a stamp, signature and date from a registered P.E. licensed to practice in the State of Colorado.
❑ Please correct inconsistencies between street names in the drainage report text and on the construction plan
drawing.
❑ Please include a copy of all summary tables from the construction plan set in the final drainage report.
❑ All culverts must adhere to HDS-5 guidelines published by the FHWA(2005).
o All culvert inlets shall include debris racks to prevent clogging due to debris accumulation and to protect
the public safety. Debris racks shall be sloped at 3H:IV or flatter per UD&FCD research.
o Driveway culverts for all lots must have flared end sections with appropriate riprap protection to protect
against probable erosion around the hydraulic jump created at culvert outlets.
o Weld County requires a minimum diameter of 15 inches for all culverts.
❑ Streets shall not have ponding in excess of 6 inches in the minor(10-year) storm or 18 inches in the major
(100-year) storm.
❑ Revegetation of all disturbed earth shall comply with all standards defined in the Revegetation section of the
Weld County Storm Drainage Criteria dated February 2006.
Li The following items must be included in the Drainage Plan(s) in the construction plan set.
o Please show offsite contours for a minimum of 200 feet outside property limits, and on all offsite areas
flowing to the project site on the drainage and erosion control sheet(s).
o All easements must be clearly identified and dimensioned. This includes but is not limited to,utility
easements, drainage easements, oil and gas easements,County and State right-of-ways, and others.
o Please identify existing utilities.
o A dedicated drainage easement is required for all areas of 100-year inundation and drainage conveyance
features.
o Please indicate the 100-year headwater depth(HW 100) on all culverts in plan view.
o Please indicate the size, material type, length, invert elevations, and name/number of every pipe in the
subdivision.
Page2of3
•
o Please identify the location, size, type, invert in/out elevations,rim elevations, and name/number of every
manhole in the subdivision. A minimum drop of 0.10 feet is required through all manholes.
❑ Please provide Storm Sewer Profile sheets in the construction plan set for all culverts and storm sewers.
o Please provide a key map to indicate all profiles on the site relative to the Storm Sewer Utility Plan.
o Please identify all existing and proposed utility locations.
o Please show the 100-year hydraulic grade line(HGL1oo) for all pipes, and show the energy grade line
(EGL100) at a minimum of 6 inches below the final finished elevation of manhole and inlet rim elevations.
o Please indicate the size,material type,length,invert elevations, and name/number of every pipe in the
subdivision.
o Please identify the location, size,type, invert in/out elevations,rim elevations, and name/number of every
manhole in the subdivision. A minimum drop of 0.10 feet is required through all manholes.
o Please show the existing and proposed ground profiles over all culverts and storm sewers.
o Please indicate the type,number,rim elevations, and clogging factors of all inlets.
r le applicant sholt**eSSComments listed abiae d this F�naP view o Comment
tirliade d , el7Xewewprocess mayi . inclusive,as revised m` a havefo be
submitted an '`_er eon.t m s .an rther te�vw The re win continue
out when all approp et Y s i coucer olved with the
__ , . `les'l p i _' to-__ 37-233L-2'3
Page 3 of 3
WELD COUNTY DRAINAGE REPORT CHECKLIST
Name: Eagle View Farms PUD Plan Date: Received June 13,2006 at PW,report dated May 25,2006.
_ovation: SW of WCR 35 and SH 392 Rev.Date: June 28,2006
Case#: PF-1090 Rev.By: Brian K.Varrella,P.EC
Attention
Comment Headings Addressedequately Required comments
g Addressed Required
The final drainage report is stamped,signed,and dated by a X A wet-stamp must be provided with signature and date.
registered P.E.licensed to practice in the State of Colorado
All submitted construction plan sheets are stamped,signed,and X No stamp,signature,or dale.
dated by a registered P.E.licensed to practice in the State of Colorado Remove"Preliminary"comment in title block
I. General Location and Description
A. Location
1.Township,Range,Section,'A-Section X
2.Local streets within and adjacent to the development X
3.Major open channels,lakes,streams,irrigation and other
water resource facilities within and adjacent to proposed X
development
4.Names of surrounding developments including jurisdiction X Please identify neighborhood to the north of SH 392 and the
(municipalities) home site to the northeast.
B. Description of Property
1.Area in acres X
2.Ground cover X
3.Major open channels and ownership X Please indicate ownership.
4.General project description X
5.Irrigation facilities and ownership information X Please indicate ownership.
6.Groundwater characteristics(where applicable) X
II. Drainage Basins and Sub-Basins
A. Major Basin Description
1.Reference to Weld County Master Drainage Plan(s)where X
applicable
2.Major basin drainage characteristics X
3.Identification of all irrigation facilities within 200 ft of the X
property boundary
4. Identification of all FEMA-defined 100-year floodplains and X
floodways affecting the property.
B. Sub-Basin Description
1.Historic drainage pattems on the subject property and X
adjacent properties
2.Off-site drainage flow patterns and impacts on the subject X Offsite flows must be considered as described in the review
property memo.
III.Drainage Design Criteria
Discussion of the optional criteria/deviation from X
A. Weld County CODE.
B. Development Criteria Reference and Constraints
1.Discussion of previous drainage studies(i.e.project master
plans)for the subject property that influence or are influenced by X
the proposed drainage design for the site
2.Discussion of site constraints such as slopes,streets,
utilities,existing structures,and the proposed development or X
site plan impacts on the proposed drainage plan
C. Hydrological Criteria
1.Identify design rainfall(source of design storm depth X
information,NOAA Atlas,UD&FCD maps,etc.)
2.Identify design storm recurrence intervals X
3.Identify runoff calculation method(s)and any computer
X
models
Weld County Public Works Page 1 of 3
Change of Zone Drainage Report Checklist Form Updated 06-22-2006
•
Comment Headings Adequately Attention
Comments
Addressed Required
4.Identify detention discharge and storage calculation X
method(s)and computer models
5.Discussion and justification of other criteria or calculation
methods used that are not presented in or referenced by the X
Weld County CODE
D. Hydraulic Criteria
1.Identify various capacity County References X
2.Identify detention outlet type X Please provide details for detention outlet.
3.Identify check/drop structure criteria used X Please provide details for required rundown or structure into
the Ogilvey Ditch.
4.Discussion of other drainage facility design criteria used that X
are presented in the Weld County CODE
IV. Drainage Facility Design
A. General Concept
1.Discussion of concept and typical drainage pattems X
2.Discussion of compliance with off-site runoff considerations X Offsite flows must be managed through site as described in the
and constraints review memo.
3.Discussion of the content of all tables,charts,figures,or X
drawings presented in the report
4.Discussion of anticipated and proposed drainage patterns X
B. Specific Details
1.Discussion of compliance with drainage criteria(street,inlet, X Culverts must be a minimum of 15 inches.
and pipe capacities,etc.)
2.Discussion of drainage problems encountered and solutions X
at specific design points
3.Discussion of detention storage and outlet design X Please include detention storage and outlet design in report
text.
4.Discussion of maintenance access and aspects of the design X Please address maintenance in report text.
5.Provide copies of Draft CDPHE or State Engineer's permit X
applications where applicable
V. Conclusions
A. Compliance with the Weld County CODE I X
B. Drainage concept
1.Effectiveness of drainage design to control damage from X
storm runoff
2.Influence of proposed development on any applicable Weld X
County Master Drainage Plan recommendations
3.Identification of and written approval of affected irrigation
company or other property owner(s). Weld County may require
that the applicant provide evidence that offsite impacted X
jurisdictions have been notified of the proposed drainage plans
and potential impacts.
VI. References
A. Reference all criteria and technical information used X
VII.Appendices
A. Hydrologic Computations
1.Land use assumptions regarding adjacent properties X
2.Initial and major storm runoff computations at specific design X
points
3.Historic and fully developed runoff computations at specific X
design points
4.Computer model input and output X
B. Hydraulic Computations
1.Culvert sizing X
2.Storm sewer sizing X
Please include water surface elevations.Max street depth is 6
3.Street capacity evaluation X in.for the minor(10-yr)and 18 in.for the major(100-yr)storms
as per Weld County Stormwater Drainage Criteria dated
February 2006.
Weld County Public Works Page 2 of 3
Change of Zone Drainage Report Checklist Form Updated 06-22-2006
•
Comment Headings Adequately Attention Comments
g Addressed Required
4.Storm inlet sizing X
5.Swale sizing X
6.Open channel sizing X
7.Rundown and/or drop structure sizing X Please provide sizing of rundown and/or drop structure.
B.Detention pond area/volume capacity and outlet sizing X
9.Changes to Calculation Methods—if applicant/design
engineer modifies any portion of UDBFCD spreadsheets used
for hydrologic or hydraulic calculations,the applicant/design X
engineer shall identify all changes to calculation assumptions or
computer programs as to type of change and specific factors
that were modified.
10.Computer model input and output X
VIII. Final Items
Proposed location and sizing of all storm sewers,swales,open
A. channels,culverts,cross-pans,and other appurtenances, X
including cross-sections of swales and open channels
B. Routing and accumulation of flows at various critical points for X
the minor storm runoff
C Routing and accumulation of flows at various critical points for X
the major storm runoff
D Detention storage facilities and outlet works,including proposed X Please provide details for outlet structure.
100-year water surface elevations
E. Location of all existing and proposed utilities _ X
Offsite flows must be managed through site as described in the
F. Routing of off-site drainage flows through the development X
review memo.
Minimum lowest opening elevations of residential and
G commercial buildings above the 100-year water surface in X Please indicate 100-yr water surface elevations for pipes,
streets,open channels,ditches,swales,or other drainage swales and streets.
facilities,as illustrated by the preliminary grading plans
H. Proposed on-site private and public utility easements X
I. Proposed off-siteprivate andpublic drainage easements X Please clarify easement along Ogilvey ditch boundary.
9 9 Y
Elevations of manhole and inlet inverts in relation to projectJ. X
datum
Please include water surface elevations.Max street depth is 6
K Proposed water surface elevations for street encroachments for X in.for the minor(10-yr)and 18 in.for the major(100-yr)storms
the minor and major stone. as per Weld County Stormwater Drainage Criteria dated
February 2006.
L. Critical hydraulic structure dimensions X Detention outlet and water quality box details missing.
M. Orifice plate sizes X
_ N. Detention pond volumes X
Please include 100-year water surface elevations on plan
O. All other critical hydraulic elevations X
sheets for pipes,swales and streets.
P Operations and Maintenance instructions for the proposed X Please address maintenance.
stormwater drainage facilities
O. Construction-phase erosion control calculations X Addressed qualitatively only.
Attention needed at discharge point to Ogilvey ditch,swale in
R. Permanent erosion and sediment control design X
sub-basin 7,and outlets of culverts.
Weld County Public Works Page 3 of t
Change of Zone Drainage Report Checklist Form Updated 06-22-2006
pe, anvast�me°�
we\d 0.1GO-c Ey\0 C�
CO3 6
7 X00
Memorandum
• TO: Chris Gathman, W.C. Planning
C DATE: June 30, 2006
FROM: Pam Smith, W.C. Department of Public E9
COLORADO Health and Environment
CASE NO.: PF-1090 NAME: Eagle View Farms
The Weld County Health Department has reviewed this Final Plan application. The location of primary
and secondary septic envelopes on the Final Plan Map are satisfactory in size and location. The plat
notes are also acceptable. The covenant language with regard to envelope restrictions is adequate.
However, the Department has asked the applicant to elaborate on the meaning of'improvements' in
Section 9.3a of the covenants for clarity. The applicant has agreed and will forward changes once
they are made.
O:\PAM\Planning\Final Plat\pf-1090 Ridgeview Farms.rtf
1
a Ctt DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES
Weld County Administrative Offices
918 10thWE Street, Greeley, O 80 31
WEBSITE: www.co.weld.co.us
Phone (970) 353-6100, Ext. 3546
Fax (970) 304-6498
Co I4209O R 4
Longmont CO 80504
Phone (720) 652-4210 Ext. 8736
COLORADO
June 29, 2006
Applicant: Eagle View Farms LLC
Case Number PF-1090
Project: A Site Specific Development Plan and Special Review Permit for a PUD Final Plan
for 24 residential lots and 9.7 acres of open space.
Legal: NE4 of Section 23, T6N, R6, R66W of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado.
Location: South of and adjacent to State Highway 392 and west of and adjacent to CR 35.
Parcel Number: 0805 23 000017
One previous permit was located for this parcel. Permit#. OGN-042029, Meter skid for Eldridge
2-23 &4-23 OGILVY #1 Tank Battery
1. A building permit application must be completed for each lot and two complete sets of
plans including engineered foundation plans bearing the wet stamp of a Colorado registered
architect or engineer must be submitted for review. A geotechnical engineering report preformed
by a registered State of Colorado engineer shall be required.
2. A plan review must be approved and a permit must be issued prior to the start of construction
on any of the planned lots.
3. The new homes shall conform to the requirements of the 2003 International Building Codes,
the 2005 National Electrical Code and Chapter 29 of the Weld County Code.
Service,Teamwork,Integrity,Quality
4. Setback and offset distances shall be determined by the 2003 International Building Codes
and Chapter 23 of the Weld County Code (Offset and setback distances are measured from the
farthest projection from the structure).
5. A Flood Hazard Development Plan is required for buildings located within a 100 year flood
plane.
6. A letter from the Fire District to ascertain if a permit is required or if there are any special
requirements.
Please contact me for any further information regarding this project.
Sii cerely,
ilwat
Robert Powell
Building Plans Examiner
Service,Teamwork, Integrity,Quality
441 (Limit
Weld County Referral
C.
COLORADO June 7, 2006
The Weld County Department of Planning Services has received the following item for review:
Applicant Eagle View Farms LLC Case Number PF-1090
Please Reply By July 5, 2006 Planner Chris Gathman
Project A Site Specific Development Plan and Special Review Permit for a PUD Final Plan
for 24 residential lots and 9.7 acres of open space
Legal NE4 of Section 23, T6N, R6, R66W of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado.
Location South of and adjacent to State Highway 392 and west of and adjacent to CR 35
Parcel Number 0805 23 000017
The application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you
consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Please reply by the above listed date so that we may
give full consideration to your recommendation. Any response not received before or on this date may be
deemed to be a positive response to the Department of Planning Services. If you have any further questions
regarding the application, please call the Planner associated with the request. Please note that new
information may be added to applications under review during the review process. If you desire to
examine or obtain this additional information, please call the Department of Planning Services.
Weld County Utility Board Hearing (if applicable) July 13, 2006
Weld County Board of County Commissioners July 26, 2006
Wehave reviewed the request and find that it does/does not comply with our Comprehensive Plan
have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests.
❑ See attached letter.
•
Comments: tily
1.41 Aift el 0 171# t/7� ��Yi// l' � c�-�� cal
pc, /r 717, no•
t (/
Signature ( n w d Date /„ • 12�0�
Agency C �J Qm is Cam(
+Weld County Planning ie. . +918 10 treet,Greeley, CO. 80631 •:•(970)353-6100 ext.3540 •(970)304-6498 fax
wer
OFFIt.:E OF COMMUNITI DEVELOPMENT
Planning Division
1100 10th Street, SA/Opt0oreeley, Colorado 80631 •(970)350-9780 • Fax(970)350-9800
tJ'Pi •www.greeleygov.com
GreCieley of RFftF�oFFi papal
JUL X
RcC 12"
July 3, 2006 ElVED
Chris Gathman
Weld County Planning Department
918 10111 Street
Greeley, CO 80631
Subject: PF-1090 PUD Final Plan (Eagle View Farms LLC)
Dear Mr. Gathman,
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this PUD Final Plan. The City of Greeley Planning
staff has reviewed the application from Eagle View Farms LLC, and recommends against this level
of development outside of municipal boundaries due to the cost of extending and serving the various
utilities and services necessary for higher densities. This site located within Greeley's Long-Range
Expected Growth Area (LREGA)which includes those lands anticipated to accommodate the City
of Greeley's urban development over the next 20 years. This type of development makes future City
development difficult. If Weld County decides to continue with this development we also wish to
forward the following recommendations:
1. ROW dedication along the southern edge of the property line should be included to provide for a
Major collector roadway to provide east-west connection. Due to the nature of a gated community
the PUD will increase the difficulty of accessing the interior of section 23. With the recent request
for a lotline adjustment (AmRE-3868) in the adjacent western property there is an excellent
opportunity to plan for future development within the section with appropriate ROW dedications.
2. Show the required setback from all oil/gas related surface equipment.
If any questions should arise please feel free to contact me at (970) 350-9824
Sincerely,
randon Goss
Planning Tec ician
r-^
SERVING OUR COMMUNITY • I T ' S A TRADITION
•
7k/worn/se/0 preserve and Improve!fie yaa/ify of/le/or ()reeky lArouy//ime4 core-/eous and cos/e/ecli ie service.
t
Project Review Comments Date: 7/3/2006
Project Name: WCR - Eagleview Farms
City of Location:
Greeley Reviewed By: Rick Behning Phone: (970) 336-4145
Submittal Date 6/26/2006 Department Eng Development Review
City ID# 1148 Submittal #: 1
Plat
Page 1
❑ New Vehicular connectivity for Section 23 should be achieved through the inclusion of
Major Collector roadways along the quarter lines of section 23. Inclusion of a
East-West connection between WCR 35 and WCR 33 will be critical to allow
vehicles an alternative path to the existing WCR 66 and HWY 392, reducing the
congestion on these Arterial roads. An East-West connection along the quarter
line may already be unlikely due to existing uses, so dedication of 100 feet of
ROW to accommodate a connection should be considered along the South
boundary of the proposed Eagle View PUD. 50 feet of ROW would be required
along this projects boundary with the other 50 feet dedicated by the property to
the South. The location of the proposed detention pond and open space provides
an ideal opportunity to buffer the road from the proposed homes. As Weld
County grows, utilizing foresight and good judgment in acquiring adequate ROW
and major roadway alignments will be instrumental in providing adequate public
facilities for the increased number of vehicular trips, which will ultimately result in
an economic advantage and help attract quality developments due to good traffic
planning.
Monday,July 03,2006 Page 1 of
o-'9-0E; t , :30AM:Eaton School Dist. ;9704545193 = _
JUN 1 5 2006
fgrt
TT gel11 In
Weld County Referral
COLORADO June 7, 2006
The Weld County Department of Planning Services has received the following item for review:
Applicant Eagle View Farms LLC Case Number PF-1090 1
Please Reply By July 5, 2006 Planner Chris Gathman
Project A Site Specific Development Plan and Special Review Permit for a PUD Final Plan
for 24 residential lots and 9.7 acres of open space
Legal NE4 of Section 23, T6N, R6, R66W of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado.
Location South of and adjacent to State Highway 392 and west of and adjacent to CR 35
Parcel Number 0805 23 000017 _ __T
The application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you
consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Please reply by the above listed date so that we may
give full consideration to your recommendation. Any response not received before or on this date may be
deemed to be a positive response to the Department of Planning Services. If you have any further questions
regarding the application, please call the Planner associated with the request. Please note that new
information may be added to applications under review during the review process. If you desire to
examine or obtain this additional information, please call the Department of Planning Services.
Weld County Utility Board Hearing (if applicable) July 13, 2006
Weld County Board of County Commissioners July 26, 2006
❑ We have reviewed the request and find that it does/does not comply with our Comprehensive Plan
❑ We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests.
gs See attached letter.
Comments:
Signature � _ 4S rtir t $tAntl Nate (1)I(CIoL
Agency a4•To") SchkooL 1. t�re..c,-r Rf.-a
r.., Weld County Planning Dept. +918 10th Street,Greeley,CO. 80631 4(970)353-6100 ext.3540 4(970)304-6498 fax
o-19-o6: 30AM;Ea ton School Dist. ;9704545193 s
EATON SCHOOL DISTRICT RE-2
Dr.Randy Miller 200 Park Avenue
Superintendent Eaton, Colorado 80615
^a70)454-3402
d 70)454-5193 Fax
June 19, 2006
Chris Gathman
Weld County Planning Department
1400 17th Avenue
Greeley, CO 80631
RE: Eagle View Farms LLC
PUD PF-1090
Chris Gathman:
We have reviewed the above applicants request and it appears the applicant's response to
accommodate our requests as outlined in previous letters has been met in the final plat drawings
(submitted by Torrey Design Studio, LLC for landscape and Intermill Land Surveying) as follows:
1. The cash-in-lieu payment of$1,043 per dwelling lot for a total of$25,032 still needs to be
paid by applicant.
2. The 6'x10' bus shelter with a roof that blocks the wind on three sides is acceptable to the
District as placed.
3. The District's request for as minimum 15'wide by 80' in length bus turnout in order to pick
up and drop off students on WCR 35 appears adequate.
Please contact me if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
Timothy Unrein
Assistant Superintendent Business Services
Eaton School District RE-2
Enc.
Date Paid
Amount
Check #
Received By
a
County Planning pYY @ld County Referral
IDc. Weld GREELEY OFFICE
COLORADO JUN 2 6 2006 June 7, 2006
RECEIVED
The Weld County Department of Planning Services has received the following item for review:
Applicant Eagle View Farms LLC Case Number PF-1090
Please Reply By July 5, 2006 Planner Chris Gathman
Project A Site Specific Development Plan and Special Review Permit for a PUD Final Plan
for 24 residential lots and 9.7 acres of open space
Legal NE4 of Section 23, T6N, R6, R66W of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado.
Location South of and adjacent to State Highway 392 and west of and adjacent to CR 35
Parcel Number 0805 23 000017
The application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you
consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Please reply by the above listed date so that we may
give full consideration to your recommendation. Any response not received before or on this date may be
deemed to be a positive response to the Department of Planning Services. If you have any further questions
regarding the application, please call the Planner associated with the request. Please note that new
information may be added to applications under review during the review process. If you desire to
examine or obtain this additional information, please call the Department of Planning Services.
Weld County Utility Board Hearing (if applicable) July 13, 2006
Weld County Board of County Commissioners July 26, 2006
❑ We have reviewed the request and find that it does/does not comply with our Comprehensive Plan
❑ We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests.
See attached letter.
Comments: up hoc n,et WI dotn'ner r iv' crud •4k, a{-nrLod
r u;�vvrbrs
Signature Cdr �O Date 4, _21 -04
Agency FF 6'
+weld County Planning Dept. ❖918 10th Street, Greeley, CO. 80631 ❖(970)353-6100 ext.3540 ❖(970)304-6498 fax
-- EATON FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
50 SOUTH MAPLE AVENI IE, EATON COLORADO 80615
970-451-2115
FAX 970-154-2161.
FIRE PREVENTION BIJREAII
May 26, 2006
Casseday Creative Designs, LLC
55 South Elm Avenue
Suite 210
Eaton CO, 80615
RE: Eagle View Farms
Robb, and Linda,
I have reviewed the information regarding the Eagle View Farms subdivision, and would
like to address the following items:
• Knox Box location and gate placed into Knox Box in presence of the Eaton Fire
Protection District before starting of new home construction.
• Upon completion of gate, a final acceptance testing will be completed before
construction of new homes can begin.
• The fire flow at 1000 gpm at 20 psi will meet the requirements of the Eaton Fire
Protection District. After installation of all hydrants the Eaton Fire Protection
District, while accompanied by North Weld County Water District, would like to
flow the hydrants in order to calculate the exact amount of water available.
• It has also come to my attention in reviewing the site plans that the fire hydrants are
spaced approximately 700-800 feet apart. In accordance with die adopted 2003
International Fire Code (2003 IFC) residential fire hydrants must be spaced no
greater than 600 feet apart, with no structure greater than 300 feet from hydrant. I
have attached a copy of the hydrant spacing requirements for your reference.
• The bus turnout and cul-de-sac radii specifications meet the requirements of the
Eaton Fire Protection District.
Thanks you for submitting die information for my review and please feel free to contact me
with any questions or concerns.
Sincerely,
Dan antillanes
Eaton Fire Protection District-FPB
0 �e�`� `�"'ad /312 .
QeQ RECEIVED Old
.- iii
rt.���°�F�°`` JUN 14 2006
�p coarrogion niticsoctian
c ' 2o1H\-\ >Je CountyReferral
d1
s.
COLORADO June 7, 2006
The Weld County Department of Planning Services has received the following item for review:
Applicant Eagle View Farms LLC Case Number PF-1090
Please Reply By July 5, 2006 Planner Chris Gathman
Project A Site Specific Development Plan and Special Review Permit for a PUD Final Plan
for 24 residential lots and 9.7 acres of open space
Legal NE4 of Section 23, T6N, R6, R66W of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado.
Location South of and adjacent to State Highway 392 and west of and adjacent to CR 35
Parcel Number 0805 23 000017 _
' submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you
consider releva t would be appreciated. Please reply by the above listed date so that we may
give full consideration to yo ion. Any response not received before or on this date may be
deemed to be a positive response to the nning Services. If you have any further questions
regarding the application, please call the Planner as a request. Please note that new
information may be added to applications under review during cess. If you desire to
examine or obtain this additional information, please call the Department o
'ces.
Weld County Utility Board Hearing (if applicable) July 13, 2006
Weld County Board of County Commissioners July 26, 2006
U We have reviewed the request and find that it does/does not comply with our Comprehensive Plan
❑ We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests.
❑ See attached lettteer.J --ROC
�\\ pp //�, �II ll � � ids
CCo�mments: �rojCCfCLI ROLA v wt4 17 �VU L.If k — 5,(0.!! oe
ks) nW 9 CtiK {I ✓ f2 . 1\1 o 8 !red- acres h
Signature cru.-4LC.k - l°L- Date
Agency (Cjy �/d 0/l7
Ac C_.2 S-D
+Weld County Planning Dept. +918 10th Street,Greeley,CO.80631 ❖(970)353-6100 ext.3540 ❖(970)304-6498 fax
13Csset°
�1eld fount
y Y flrflB
;tie
oFfif .Id County Referral
C. RE � ° Zoos
COLORADO ��/V�o June 7, 2006
The Weld County Department of Planning Services has received the following item for review:
Applicant Eagle View Farms LLC Case Number PF-1090
Please Reply By July 5, 2006 Planner Chris Gathman
Project A Site Specific Development Plan and Special Review Permit for a PUD Final Plan
for 24 residential lots and 9.7 acres of open space
Legal NE4 of Section 23, T6N, R6, R66W of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado.
Location South of and adjacent to State Highway 392 and west of and adjacent to CR 35
Parcel Number 0805 23 000017
The application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you
consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Please reply by the above listed date so that we may
give full consideration to your recommendation. Any response not received before or on this date may be
deemed to be a positive response to the Department of Planning Services. If you have any further questions
regarding the application, please call the Planner associated with the request. Please note that new
information may be added to applications under review during the review process. If you desire to
examine or obtain this additional information, please call the Department of Planning Services.
Weld County Utility Board Hearing (if applicable) July 13, 2006
Weld County Board of County Commissioners July 26, 2006
UWe have reviewed the request and find that it does/does not comply with our Comprehensive Plan
We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests.
❑ See attached letter.
Comments:
Signature Date h/ .O7 Gb
Agency Co Di 15 lc, -- C-1/4 1-) 1i fin(
+Weld County Planning Dept. ❖918 10th Street, Greeley,CO. 80631 ❖(970)353-6100 ext.3540 4(970)304-6498 fax
Hello