The URL can be used to link to this page

Browse Search

Home My WebLink About20063124.tiff 172 WELD COUNTY CODE ORDINANCE 2006-7 IN THE MATTER OF REPEALING AND REENACTING, WITH AMENDMENTS, CHAPTER 8 PUBLIC WORKS, OF THE WELD COUNTY CODE BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF THE COUNTY OF WELD, STATE OF COLORADO: WHEREAS,the Board of County Commissioners of the County of Weld, State of Colorado, pursuant to Colorado statute and the Weld County Home Rule Charter, is vested with the authority of administering the affairs of Weld County, Colorado, and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners, on December 28, 2000, adopted Weld County Code Ordinance 2000-1,enacting a comprehensive Code for the County of Weld,including the codification of all previously adopted ordinances of a general and permanent nature enacted on or before said date of adoption, and WHEREAS, the Weld County Code is in need of revision and clarification with regard to procedures, terms, and requirements therein. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of County Commissioners of the County of Weld,State of Colorado,that certain existing Chapters of the Weld County Code be,and hereby are, repealed and re-enacted, with amendments, and the various Chapters are revised to add the following to read as follows. CHAPTER 8 PUBLIC WORKS ARTICLE XI Weld County Storm Drainage Criteria Division 1 General Provisions Section 8-11-10. Purpose and authority. This Weld County Storm Drainage Criteria is adopted in order to provide minimum standards to preserve and protect the public health, safety, and general welfare in the unincorporated lands of Weld County, pursuant to authority granted by Part 4 of Article 15 of Title 30, and Article 35 of Title 30, C.R.S. Section 8-11-20. Adoption of storm drainage standards - short title. The Denver,Colorado, Urban Drainage and Flood Control District's"Urban Storm Drainage Criteria Manual,"consisting of Volume 1 (June 2001), Volume 2 (June 2001), and Volume 3, Best Management Practices(September 1999), is hereby adopted by reference,with the amendments which are set forth herein. The provisions of this Article XI shall be known as the "Weld County Storm Drainage Criteria." All facilities for storm drainage on properties located within the unincorporated lands of Weld County,whether public or private,shall be designed and constructed 11111111111111111IIII1111111liii 1111111 III 11111IIII �0 2006-3124 3439172 12/04/2006 02:25P Weld County, CO de,n(J ORD2006-7 1 of 65 R 0.00 D 0.00 Steve Moreno Clerk& Recorder 41- 7-e‘, in accordance with such criteria, unless required otherwise by an applicable master drainage plan approved by Weld County. A copy of the "Urban Storm Drainage Criteria Manual" shall be kept on file in the office of the Weld County Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners for inspection during regular business hours. It may be downloaded by visiting the Urban Drainage and Flood Control District web site at www.udfcd.org, or ordered by contacting the Urban Drainage and Flood Control District at 303-455-6277. Section 8-11-30. Weld County Addendum to the Text of the Urban Storm Drainage Criteria - Volume 1 A. Chapter 1 - Drainage Policy 1. Amend Section 1.4 Planning to read: "Storm drainage is a part of the total urban environmental system. Therefore, storm drainage planning and design must be compatible with comprehensive regional plans. A master plan for storm drainage should be developed and maintained in an up-to-date fashion at all times for each urbanizing drainage watersheds in Weld County. The planning for drainage facilities should be coordinated with planning for open space and transportation. By coordinating these efforts, new opportunities may be identified that can assist in the solution of drainage problems. Natural drainageways should be used for storm runoff waterways wherever feasible. Major consideration must be given to the floodplains and open space requirements of the area (White 1945). Planning and design of stormwater drainage systems should not be based on the premise that problems can be transferred from one location to another. Stormwater runoff can be stored in detention reservoirs. Such storage can reduce the drainage conveyance capacity required immediately downstream. Acquisition of open space having a relationship to drainageways will provide areas where storm runoff can spread out and be stored for slower delivery downstream." 2. Amend Section 1.5 Technical Issues to read: "Storm drainage planning and design should follow the criteria developed and presented in this Urban Storm Drainage Criteria Manual (Manual). Every urban area has two separate and distinct drainage systems,whether or not they are actually planned and designed. One is the initial system, and the other is the major system. To provide for orderly urban growth, reduce costs to future generations and avoid loss of life and major property damage, both systems must be planned, properly engineered and maintained. The determination of runoff magnitude should be by the Rational Formula, the Colorado Urban Hydrograph Procedure (CUHP), HEC-1, HEC-HMS, or statistical analyses based on an adequate record of actual measured flood occurrences as set forth in the RUNOFF chapter of this Manual. Use of streets for urban drainage should fully recognize that the primary use of streets is for traffic. Streets should not be used as floodways for initial storm runoff. Urban drainage design should have as an objective reduction of street repair and maintenance costs to the public. Irrigation ditches should not be used as outfall points for initial or major drainage systems, unless such use is shown to be without unreasonable ASO 11111 1111111 IIII 1111111 III 1111111111111 2006-3124 3439172 12/04/2006 02:25P Weld County, CO ORD2006-7 2 of 65 R 0.00 D 0.00 Steve Moreno Clerk& Recorder hazard, as substantiated by thorough hydraulic engineering analysis, and written approval of the ditch owner(s) is obtained. In addition, irrigation ditches cannot be relied on for mitigating upstream runoff. Proper design and construction of stormwater detention basins are necessary to minimize future maintenance and operating costs and to avoid public nuisances and health hazards. This is particularly important, given the many detention and retention facilities in Weld County. Weld County has adopted and needs to maintain its floodplain management program. Floodplain management must encompass comprehensive criteria designed to encourage, where necessary, the adoption of permanent measures which will lessen the exposure of life, property and facilities to flood losses, improve the long- range land management and use of flood-prone areas, and inhibit, to the maximum extent feasible, unplanned and economically unjustifiable future development in such areas." 3. Amend Section 1.6 Flood Insurance to read: "Flood insurance is an integral part of the strategy to manage flood losses. Weld County continues to participate in the National Flood Insurance Program, set forth in the National Flood Insurance Act (NFIA) of 1968, as amended." 4. Add the following to Section 2.1 Drainage is a Regional Phenomenon That Does Not Respect the Boundaries Between Government Jurisdictions or Between Properties: "Weld County may from time to time enter into Agreements with adjacent counties to cooperate on regional planning. The Policy of Weld County shall be to pursue a jurisdictionally unified drainage effort to assure an integrated drainage system, and to cooperate with other regional and local planning agencies on drainage matters." 5. Amend Section 3.1.2 Rainfall-Runoff Relationships to read: "A program should be maintained to collect and analyze rainfall-runoff relationships in urban areas of Weld County." 6. Amend Section 3.1.4 Library to read: "Weld County should acquire and actively maintain a library, which should be available for use by all governmental agencies, practicing planners, and engineers. The public should be encouraged to use the library as part of Weld County's educational and outreach programs." 7. Amend Section 3.1.5 Runoff Magnitudes to read: "Where practical, the magnitude of computed and measured runoff peaks should be tabulated for Weld County streams and gulches so that comparisons may be readily made between watersheds and erroneous values may be more easily identified." LL !ULJ' lJ2!LL ' IIIII WJJ"L ("IIIIIII III VIII IIII IIII 65 R 0.00 O 0.00 teveorreno S Moreno 3 of Clerk& Recorder 2006-3124 . . ._ ORD2006-7 8. Amend Section 3.2 Floodplain Data to read: "The program to delineate flood hazard areas along all waterways in the region should be maintained. This program should make full use of such sources as the FEMA Flood Insurance Studies, data from the Natural Resources Conservation Service, the USGS, and floodplain studies by private consulting engineers. This information should be regularly reviewed and updated to reflect changes due to urbanization, changed channel conditions, and the occurrence of extraordinary hydrologic events." 9. Amend Section 3.2.2 Data Inventory to read: "The information collected should be stored in a Weld County Department of Public Works file available to all planners, developers, and engineers." 10. Amend the first sentence of Section 3.2.4 Priority for Data Acquisition to read: "Weld County will establish priorities for acquisition of data because it is recognized that not all of the data can be collected at one time." 11. Amend Section 3.3.1 Master Plan to read: "Drainage design does not lend itself to a piece-meal approach; therefore, master plans for drainage should be prepared on a priority basis. Such plans already cover most of the developed major drainageways in Weld County. Additional plans will be developed for areas yet unplanned. In addition,existing master plans will be updated as needed to reflect changed conditions that take place over time." 12. Amend Section 4.1 Total Urban System to read: "Storm drainage is a part of the total urban environmental system. Therefore, storm drainage planning and design should be compatible with comprehensive regional plans. Master plans for storm drainage have been developed and maintained in an up-to-date fashion for Weld County. An effort to complete the coverage of drainage master plans for yet unplanned areas of Weld County should be continued until full coverage is achieved." 13. Amend Section 4.1.2 Master Plan to read: "Early work includes the planning of major drainageways from the point of outfall, proceeding in an upstream direction. The major drainageways are generally well defined and often dictate the design of the initial drainage system, including storm sewers, detention facilities, and water quality systems. Weld County has established a suitable format for master plan reports and drawings so thata uniform planning approach and coordination of efforts can more easily be made. Master planning should be done in enough detail and with adequate thoroughness to provide a ready drainage development guide for the future in a particular watershed. Generalized concepts based on rule-of-thumb hydrological analyses should not be used 11111111111111111 IIII 1111111 IIII 1111111 III IIIII IIII IIII 2006-3124 3439172 12/04/2006 02:25P Weld County, CO ORD2006-7 4 of 65 R 0.00 0 0.00 Steve Moreno Clerk& Recorder as master plans; a more rigorous analysis is necessary. The Policy of Weld County shall be to enforce and implement adopted Master Drainage Plans. These Master Drainage Plans may be amended from time to time in the future." 14. Amend Section 4.1.3, paragraph#2, Planning Process Ingredients to read: "2. Initial Drainage System Planning. All local and regional planning must take into consideration the initial drainage system to transport the runoff from storms expected to occur once every 2 years. The planner of an initial system must strive to minimize future drainage complaints." 15. Amend the second paragraph of Section 4.1.6 Water Quality to read: "Sanitary sewerage systems that overflow or bypass untreated sewage into surface streams should not be permitted in Weld County. Existing systems that discharge sewage should be adjusted by their owners to eliminate this problem." 16. Add the following to Section 4.3.1 Channelization: "It shall be the policy of Weld County to review proposed channel designs on a case-by-case basis. Proposed modifications to natural channels shall be approved only if the proposed work causes no injury to water rights and is not in violation of State or Federal law." 17. Add the following to Section 4.5 Detention and Retention Storage: "The Policy of Weld County shall be to require regional and/or on-site detention for all future developments. Temporary or interim detention/ retention may be required if the downstream regional facilities have not yet been constructed per the applicable Master Plan. Stormwater retention facilities are normally not allowed in Weld County, but will be considered for special circumstances. It is Weld County policy to require detention of runoff from the 100-year storm falling on the developed site and release of the detained water at the rate of the runoff of the 5-year storm falling on the undeveloped site. Detention releases based on soil types are not approved for Weld County. Proposed developments must provide for safe conveyance of off-site flows through the proposed development site. Off- site flows may be routed through or around the proposed detention facilities. Positive drainage must be provided. Weld County will not approve any detention or retention pond that does not drain in less than 72 hours, or causes injury to water rights, or is in violation of State or Federal law." 18. Amend Section 4.5.4 Reliance on Non-Flood-Control Reservoirs to read: "Jurisdictional dams are classified by the State Engineer as either low, moderate, or high hazard structures depending on conditions downstream. Dams are classified as high hazard structures when, in the event of failure, there is a potential loss of life. Dams presently rated as low or moderate hazard structures may be changed to high hazard rating if development 111111 11111 11111 VIII 111111 1111 1111111 III 11111 IIII IIII 2006-3124 3439172 12/04/2006 02:25P Weld County, CO ORD2006-7 5 of 65 R 0.00 0 0.00 Steve Moreno Clerk& Recorder occurs within the potential path of flooding due to a dam breach. In this case, the reservoir owners would be liable for the cost of upgrading the structure to meet the higher hazard classification. The Policy of the Weld County shall be to: 1. Restrict upstream development to areas outside of the jurisdictional dam water surface elevation created by a 100-year storm plus freeboard. 2. Restrict downstream development to areas outside of the jurisdictional dam 100-year floodplain. The jurisdictional dam 100-year floodplain is defined as either: a. The 100-year floodplain downstream of the emergency spillway assuming the dam is full to the elevation of the emergency spillway at the beginning of the 100-year storm and the 100-year storm is routed through the dam and out the emergency spillway, OR b. The path that the basin's 100-year floodplain would form through the downstream development if the dam were removed by the owner." 19. Amend Section 4.5.5 Reliance on Embankments to read: "The detention of floodwaters behind embankments created by railroads, highways or roadways resulting from hydraulically undersized culverts or bridges should not be utilized by the drainage engineer for flood peak mitigation when determining the downstream flood peaks for channel capacity purposes unless such detention has been covered by a binding agreement approved by Weld County." 20. Amend Section 5.1 Design Criteria to read: "Storm drainage planning and design should adhere to the criteria developed and presented in this Manual maintained by Weld County." 21. Amend Section 5.1.1 Design Criteria to read: "The design criteria presented herein represent current good engineering practice, and their use in Weld County is recommended.The criteria are not intended to be an ironclad set of rules that the planner and designer must follow;they are intended to establish guidelines, standards and methods for sound planning and design. The Weld County Department of Public Works may grant variances from the design criteria of this Manual by acceptance of the Final Drainage Report in which the variance request is well documented." 22. Delete the second paragraph of Section 5.2.1 Design Storm Return Periods. 111111111111111111111111111111111111111III11111pill 2006-3124 3439172 12/04/2006 02:25P Weld County, CO ORD2006-7 6 of 65 R 0.00 D 0.00 Steve Moreno Clerk& Recorder 23. Amend Section 5.2.2 Initial Storm Provisions to read: "The initial storm drainage system, capable of safely handling 10-year floods, is necessary to reduce the frequency of street flooding and maintenance costs,to provide protection against regularly recurring damage from storm runoff, to help create an orderly urban system, and to provide convenience to urban residents. Normally, the initial drainage system cannot economically carry major runoffs,though the major drainage system can provide for the initial runoff. A well-planned major drainage system will reduce or eliminate the need for storm sewer systems(Jones 1967). Storm sewer systems consisting of underground pipes are a part of initial storm drainage systems." 24. Amend Section 5.4.1 Use of Streets to read: "Streets are significant and important in urban drainage, and full use should be made of streets for storm runoff up to reasonable limits, recognizing that the primary purpose of streets is for traffic. Reasonable limits of the use of streets for transportation of storm runoff should be governed by reasonable design criteria as summarized in Table DP-1 and in the Streets/Inlets/Storm Sewers chapter of this Manual. Urban drainage design should have as objectives reduction of street repair, maintenance costs, nuisance to the public, and disruption of traffic flow. When maximum allowed encroachment is present, the storm sewer system design based on the initial storm should commence. Development of a major drainage system that can often drain the initial runoff from the streets is encouraged, thus making the point at which the storm sewer system should commence further downstream. Initial and major drainage planning should go hand-in-hand. While it is the intent of this policy to have major storm runoff removed from public streets at frequent and regular intervals and routed into major drainageways,it is recognized that water will often tend to follow streets and roadways and that streets and roadways often may be aligned so they will provide a specific runoff conveyance function. Planning and design objectives forthe major drainage system with regard to public streets should be based upon following the limiting criteria summarized in Table DP-2 and in the Streets/Inlets/Storm Sewers chapter of this Manual. The allowable flow across a street should be within the criteria presented in Table DP-3 and in the Streets/Inlets/Storm Sewers chapter of this Manual. An arterial street crossing will generally require that a storm sewer system be commenced,unless the topography is such that day-lighted inlet culverts or other suitable means can transport the initial storm runoff under the arterial street or water can be routed to a major drainage facility. Bubblers (inverted siphons which convey flows beneath roadways) are not encouraged in Weld County because of possible plugging with sediment and difficulty in maintaining them. Collector streets should have cross pans only at infrequent locations as specified by the governing agency and in accordance with good traffic engineering practices. The local street criteria 11111111111111111 IIII 1111111 IIII 1111111 III 11111 IIII IIII 2006-3124 3439172 12/04/2006 02:25P Weld County, CO ORD2006-7 7 of 65 R 0.00 D 0.00 Steve Moreno Clerk& Recorder for overtopping also apply to any private access road that serves commercial areas or more than one residence, for emergency access and safety reasons." 25. Add the following to Section 5.5 Irrigation Ditches: "It is the policy of Weld County to prohibit the discharge of stormwater runoff from developed areas into irrigation ditches and facilities, except as required by water rights or where such discharges are in conformance with approved Master Drainage plans. Further, wherever new development will alter patterns of drainage into irrigation ditches by increasing flow rates or volumes, or will change the historic concentration points of runoff, the County shall require each new development to obtain written consent of the appropriate ditch company before approving the drainage design and development." 26. Amend Section 5.5.1 Use of Ditches to read: "The irrigation ditches coursing through urban areas are laid out on flat slopes and with limited carrying capacity. Based on experience and hydraulic calculations, irrigation ditches cannot, as a general rule, be used as an outfall point for the initial storm drainage system because of physical limitations. Exceptions to the rule can occur when the capacity of the irrigation ditch is adequate to carry the normal ditch flow plus the initial storm runoff with adequate freeboard to avoid creating a hazard to those below the ditch. Written approval must be obtained from the ditch owner stating that the owner understands the physical and legal (i.e., liability) consequences of accepting said runoff. If there is a question about the use of irrigation ditches as outfalls for initial storm runoff, there is no question about their unsuitability as an outfall for the major storm runoff. Without major reworking of irrigation ditches to provide major carrying capacity without undue hazard to those downstream or below the ditch, the ditches are almost always totally inadequate for such a use and should not be used as an outfall. Moreover, because ditches are normally privately owned, one cannot assume the perpetual existence or function of a ditch. Land planners and engineers with a proposed development downhill from a ditch shall plan for pre-ditch drainage conditions as well as continued ditch seepage. For new development, it shall be the policy of Weld County to prohibit undetained discharges to roadside ditches located in the County right-of-way. In the event a proposed development wishes to design stormwater discharge to a County right-of-way,the developer,at the request of the County, shall have the requirement to design and construct drainage improvements to the right-of-way at the developers' own expense. Such improvements shall include, but not be limited to: detention ponds, armored channels, culverts, and other drainage facilities. Cost-sharing of such needed improvements may be borne by adjacent developments, such cost sharing to be negotiated by the developer. Weld County may require written agreements and construction bonding of such offsite drainage improvements." 27. Amend Section 5.5.3 Conformance With Master Plan to read: I IIIIII VIII VIII IIII IIIIIII IIII IIIIIII III VIII IIII IIII 3439172 12/04/2006 02:25P Weld County, CO 2006-3124 8 of 65 R 0.00 D 0.00 Steve Moreno Clerk& Recorder ORD2006-7 "Use of irrigation ditches for collection and transport of either initial or major storm runoff should be prohibited unless specifically provided in the Weld County master plans, or approved by Weld County and the ditch owner." 28. Amend Section 5.6 Detention and Retention Facilities Maintenance to read: "The significant cost of handling stormwater runoff, coupled with the social benefits to be derived from proper storm drainage facilities, points towards the use of detention and retention basins for storage of stormwater runoff in Weld County. Maintenance provisions must be arranged. Maintenance of detention or retention facilities includes the removal of debris, excessive vegetation from the embankment, and sediment. Without maintenance, a detention/retention facility will become an unsightly social liability and eventually become ineffective." 29. Amend Section 6.1 Purpose to read: "Floodplain management includes comprehensive criteria designed to encourage, where necessary, the adoption of permanent state or local measures which will lessen exposure of property and facilities to flood losses, improve long-range land management and use of flood-prone areas, and inhibit,to the maximum extent feasible, unplanned future development in such areas." 30. Amend first sentence of Section 6.2 Goals to read: "There are two goals in regard to floodplain management: •To reduce the vulnerability of Weld County residents to the danger and damage of floods." 31. Amend Section 6.3.2 New Development to add the following: "The Policy of Weld County shall be to outsource engineering review of all CLOMR and LOMR submittals received with a development application. The developers shall reimburse the Weld County Department of Public Works for all outsourced engineering review costs. Upon FEMA approval of a CLOMR or LOMR, payment of all outsourced engineering review costs is due and payable to Weld County. Developers are welcome to contract directly with our outsourced consultant(s) for the preparation of CLOMR's and LOMR's, if they so desire." 32. Amend Section 7.1 Adoption of Drainage Master Plans to read: "This Manual and master plans should be adopted and used by all governmental agencies operating within Weld County." 33. Amend Section 7.3 Amendments to read: "Problems in urban drainage administration encountered by anyone should be reviewed by Weld County to determine if equity or public interests indicate a need for drainage policy, practice, or procedural amendments. Weld County should continually review the needs of the community in LI3!I IIIII IIIII 1111 111111 1111 1111111 III 1111111111111 2006-3124 3439172 12/04/2006 02:25P Weld County CO 9 of 65 R 0.00 D 0.00 Steve Moreno Clerk& Recorder ORD2006-7 regard to urban runoff criteria and should recommend changes as necessary to this Manual." 34. Add Section 7.5 Drainage Improvements to read: "Weld County Master Drainage Plans set forth improvements required for existing and future growth areas. There are areas of Weld County for which no Master Drainage plans yet exist. Weld County may require a Master Drainage study in support of proposed development. The policy of Weld County regarding the design and construction of improvements within the Master Drainage Plan areas shall be as set forth below, subject to Weld County budget and appropriation approvals. 1. Weld County shall identify needed design and construction of improvements as set forth in adopted Master Drainage Plans for existing and future growth areas. 2. The drainage systems for future development and redevelopment shall be designed and constructed by the developer(s). 3. The developers shall be responsible for design and construction of temporary or interim storm drainage systems required due to the lack of adequate storm drainage facilities downstream of new development. 4. The developers may be responsible for design and construction of permanent storm drainage systems required due to the lack of adequate storm drainage facilities downstream of new development." B. Chapter 3 - Planning 1. Amend first paragraph of Section 7.1 Initial Drainage to read: "Planning and design for urban storm runoff must be considered from the viewpoint of the regularly expected storm occurrence, which includes the initial storm and the major storm. The initial (minor)storm has been defined by Weld County to have a return frequency of once in tem (10) years (the 10-year storm) for all uses. The major storm has been defined to have a return period of 100 years. The objective of major storm runoff planning and design is to reduce the potential for major damage and loss of life. The initial drainage system is necessary to reduce inconvenience, frequently recurring damages, and high street maintenance and to help create an orderly urban system with significant sociological benefits." 2. Amend second paragraph of Section 9.1 Storm Sewers to read: "The initial drainage system, including storm sewers, is that portion of the total drainage system that often receives the most attention from engineers. It is what the average citizen considers to be the urban drainage system. It is what directly contributes to the orderly growth of a community by 11111111111111111 1111 1111111 1111 1111111 I I I 111111 III 1111 2006-3124 3439172 12/04/2006 02:25P Weld County, CO 10 of 65 R 0.00 0 0.00 Steve Moreno Clerk & Recorder OR D2006-7 handling the storm runoff expected to occur once every ten (10)years (the 10-year storm) for all uses." 3. Amend Section 9.4 System Sizing to read: "The design return period to be used for storm sewer design in Weld County is the 10-year storm for all land uses. Storm sewers passing flow under County roads shall have a minimum design capacity for the 10-year storm and a minimum diameter of 15 inches or equivalent open area. System sizing design shall adhere to Weld County street inundation criteria of six(6) inches for the minor storm, and 18 inches for the major storm event. This is a departure from the policy of recommending different return periods for different land uses. Experience has shown that it is not practical to vary storm sewer design by land use because a single system often serves multiple land uses. Instead, greater attention is necessary to ensure that the major system is adequate to protect the public and property within all areas, regardless of land use." C. Chapter 4 - Rainfall 1. Add the following to Section 1.0 Rainfall: "For proposed Weld County development drainage design,the Rainfall Depth-Duration-Frequency maps presented in the USDCM may be utilized only for those areas of Weld County shown on the Figures in that manual(Figures RA-1 through RA-12). Drainage designs proposed for locations outside of the areas of Weld County covered by Figures RA-1 through RA-12 should utilize the depth-duration-frequency information provided in the Precipitation-Frequency Atlas of the Western United States, Volume II - Colorado published by the National Oceanicand Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). The NOAA Atlas may be accessed at: http://www.nws.noaa.gov/oh/hdsc/noaaatlas2.htm. Where development is proposed in largerwatersheds,design hydrology should utilize longer storm durations appropriate for the size of the entire watershed. See Tables RA-1 and RA-3 in the USDCM for storm duration and area adjustments." D. Chapter 5 - Runoff 1. Add the following to Section 3.3.1 Rainfall: "See Tables RA-1 and RA-2 within the USDCM Rainfall Chapter for 1-hour and 2-hour rainfall area adjustments and distributions. For locations outside of Weld County, covered by USDCM Figures RA-1 through RA-12, utilize the depth-duration-frequency information provided in the Precipitation-Frequency Atlas of the Western United States, Volume II." 2. Amend Section 5.1 Published Hydrologic Information to read: "Weld County has prepared hydrologic studies for the major drainageways within Weld County boundaries. These studies contain information regarding peak flow and runoff volume from the 2-year through 100-year storm events for numerous design points within the watershed. They also contain information regarding watershed and sub-watershed boundaries, soil types, percentage imperviousness, and rainfall. The studies are 111111 IIIII IIIII III' 1111111 IIII 1111111 III 111111 III IIII 2006-3124 3439172 12/04/2006 02:25P Weld County, CO ORD2006-7 11 of 65 R 0.00 D 0.00 Steve Moreno Clerk& Recorder available at the Weld County Department of Public Works. When published flow values are available from the Weld County for any waterway of interest, these values should be used for design unless there are compelling reasons to modify the published values." E. Chapter 6 - Streets/Inlets/Storm Sewers 1. Amend Section 1.3 Components of Urban Stormwater Collection and Conveyance Systems to read: "Urban stormwater collection and conveyance systems within Weld County are comprised of three primary components: (1)street gutters and roadside swales, (2)stormwater inlets, and(3)storm sewers(and appurtenances like manholes,junctions, etc.). Street gutters and roadside swales collect runoff from the street(and adjacent areas) and convey the runoff to a stormwater inlet while maintaining the street's level-of-service." 2. Amend first two paragraphs of Section 2.2 Design Considerations to read: "Certain design considerations must be taken into account in order to meet street drainage objectives. The primary design objective is to keep the spread (encroachment) of stormwater on the street below an acceptable value for a given return period of flooding. As mentioned previously, when stormwater collects on the street and flows down the gutter,the top width(or spread) of the water widens as more stormwater is collected. If left unchecked, the spread of water would eventually hinder traffic flow and possibly become hazardous (i.e., reduced skid resistance, hydroplaning, splash, etc.). Based on these considerations,Weld County has established encroachment (spread) standards for the minor storm event. These standards are provided in Chapter 3, Planning, Section 9.4 of the Weld County Storm Drainage Criteria. Standards for the major storm and street cross flows are also required. The major storm needs to be assessed to determine the potential for flooding and public safety. Cross flows also need to be regulated for traffic flow and public safety reasons. Weld County has established street inundation standards during the major storm event and allowable cross-street flow standards. These standards are provided in Chapter 3, Planning, Section 9.4 of the Weld County Storm Drainage Criteria. Allowable flow depth is measured vertically from the gutter flowline at the curb face." 3. Amend second paragraph Section 2.3.1.3 Allowable Gutter Hydraulic Capacity Weld County to read: "There are two sets of reduction factors developed for Denver metropolitan areas (Guo 2000b) and they shall also be utilized for Weld County. One is for the minor event, and another is for the major event. Figure ST-2 shows that the reduction factor remains unity (1.0) for a street slope <1.5%, and then decreases as the street slope increases." 1111111111111111111 1111111111111111 1111111III 111111 III IIII 2006-3124 3439172 12/04/2006 02:25P Weld County, CO ORD2006-7 12 of 65 R 0.00 D 0.00 Steve Moreno Clerk & Recorder 4. Add the following to Section 3.1 Inlet Functions, Types and Appropriate Applications: "The standard inlets permitted for use in Weld County streets are: INLET TYPE PERMITTED USE Curb Opening Inlet Type R All street types with 6" vertical curb Grated Inlet Type C All streets with a roadside ditch or swale Grated Inlet Type 13 Alleys or private drives with a valley gutter Combination Inlet Type 13 All street types with 6" vertical curb 5. Add the following to Section 3.3.6 Inlet Clogging: "To account for effects which decrease the capacity of the various types of inlets, such as debris plugging, pavement overlaying, and variations in design assumptions, the theoretical capacity calculated for the inlets is to be reduced by the factors presented below for the standard inlets permitted for use in Weld County. WELD COUNTY ALLOWABLE INLET CAPACITY CONDITION INLET TYPE PERCENT OF THEORETICAL CAPACITY ALLOWED Sump or CDOT Type R Continuous Grade 5' length 88 10' length 92 15' length 95 Continuous Grade Combination Type 13 66 Sump Grated Type C 50 Grated Type 13 50 Sump Combination Type 13 65 6. Amend the first paragraph of Section 3.4.2 Design Considerations to read: "The primary design consideration for the location and spacing of inlets on continuous grades is the spread limitation. This was addressed in Section 2.2. " IIIIIII 1111111111 IIII 1111111 IIII HI III 111111 III IIII 3439172 12/04/2006 02:25P Weld County, CO 2006-3124 13 of 65 R 0.00 D 0.00 Steve Moreno Clerk& Recorder ORD2006-7 7. Amend the third paragraph Section 4.2 Design Process, Considerations, and Constraints to read: "Once a final layout is chosen, storm sewers are sized using hydrologic techniques (to determine peak flows) and hydraulic analysis (to determine pipe capacities). This is accomplished by designing the upstream pipes first and moving downstream. The minimum size storm sewer pipe within a Public Right-of-Way or Public Drainage Easement shall be 15 inches in diameter or equivalent open area. Refer to the"Weld County Development Standards and Specifications Governing the Construction of Public Improvements", latest edition, for allowable storm sewer pipe materials. Pipes generally increase in size moving downstream since the drainage area is increasing. It is not good design practice to decrease the pipe size moving downstream,even if a steeper slope is encountered that will provide sufficient capacity with a smaller pipe. The potential for clogging is always a concern." 8. Add the following to Section 4.4.1 Flow Equations and Storm Sewer Sizing: "The Manning's roughness coefficient"n" for all storm sewer pipe capacity Weld County calculations shall be 0.013 regardless of pipe material (ie. Concrete, PVC, or HDPE) with the exception of corrugated metal pipes which shall have a coefficient of 0.025." 9. Add the following to Section 4.5 Hydraulic and Energy Grade Line Calculations: "The hydraulic grade line and energy grade line shall be calculated for each storm sewer system and included in the Final Drainage Report. Each storm sewer system shall be profiled on the Final Construction Drawings and shall include the design flow hydraulic grade line (HGL). The energy grade line (EGL) for the design flow shall be at least 6 inches below the final finished elevation of the manhole rims and inlet flowlines." F. Chapter 7 - Major Drainage 1. Add the following to the first Paragraph of Section 3.2.3.2 Side Slopes:"For constructed or natural channels with sideslopes steeper than 2:1, appropriate construction setbacks from the channel edge may be required to allow potential future channel meandering. Access for maintenance may require easement." 2. Amend Section 3.2.7 Summary of Preliminary Design Guidance to add the following note to Table MD-2: "Grass lined open channels conveying < 50 cfs may reduce the minimum 1.0 foot freeboard requirement to the freeboard required to conveying 1.33 times the 100-year design flow. The reduced freeboard may only occur if a 1.0-foot minimum freeboard is not physically or reasonably possible and a variance request is submitted." 3. Delete the first paragraph of Section 3.2.8 Maintenance Eligibility and replace with the following: "Weld County will only maintain eligible major drainage ways by special agreement. The requirements below must be satisfied as of(adoption date) 11111111111111111 M 1111111 IIII 1111111 III 111111 III IIII 2006-3124 3439172 12/04/2006 02:25P Weld County, CO ORD2006-7 14 of 65 R 0.00 D 0.00 Steve Moreno Clerk & Recorder for a major drainage channel to be eligible for Weld County maintenance. Note that the Weld County"Maintenance Eligibility Guidelines"may change with time." 4. Amend the first sentence of Section 3.2.8.3 Grass-Lined Channel Design to read: "The design for a grass-lined channel must meet the following criteria to be eligible for Weld County maintenance:" 5. Amend Section 3.3.4 Maintenance to read: "Weld County and the design engineer shall worktogetherto provide access to all major drainageways as determined appropriate at the time of preliminary and final design. Weld County encourages volunteers to assist Weld County in performing routine maintenance of all the drainage ways within the County through an Adoption program and will assist these groups in a variety of ways." 6. Amend the fourth paragraph of Section 3.5 Choice of Channel Lining to read: "Manufactured channel linings such as gabions, interlocked concrete blocks, synthetic linings,etcetera,are not recommended for new developments, but will be considered by Weld County on a case-by-case basis. As with concrete-and riprap-lined channels, all of these types are best considered for helping to solve existing urban flooding problems where right-of-way is very limited. Manufactured channel linings should be used with caution,and each type of channel lining must be scrutinized for its merits, applicability, ability to meet other community needs,long term integrity, and maintenance needs and costs." 7. Add the following to Section 4.1.5 Trickle and Low-Flow Channels: "Under drain pipes shall not be used in lieu of trickle channels within Weld County but will be considered by Weld County on a case-by-case basis." 8. Amend the first paragraph of Section 4.1.7 Water Surface Profile to read: "Water surface profiles should be computed for all channels conveying>50 cfs within Weld County. Computation of the water surface profile should include standard backwater methods, taking into consideration all losses due to changes in velocity, drops, bridge openings, and other obstructions. Computations should begin at a known point and extend in an upstream direction for subcritical flow. It is for this reason that the channel should be designed from a downstream direction to an upstream direction. It is necessary to show the energy gradient on all preliminary drawings to help ensure against errors. Whether or not the energy grade line is shown on the final drawings is an option of the reviewing agency, although the District encourages this." 9. Add the following as the third paragraph of Section 4.1.7 Water Surface Profile: "Hydraulic grade lines shall be shown on the Final Construction 111111 (IIII VIII IIII IIIIIII IIII IIIIIII III 111111 III IIII 2006-3124 3439172 12/04/2006 02:25P Weld County, CO ORD2006-7 15 of 65 R 0.00 D 0.00 Steve Moreno Clerk& Recorder Drawing profiles of open channels conveying > 50 cfs within Weld County. It is not necessary to show energy grade lines on Final Construction Drawing profiles, but it is encouraged. The energy grade line for the design flow shall be at, or below, the final finished top of channel bank elevation. Hydraulic grade lines on Final Construction Drawings are encouraged and will ease assessment and review of compliance with street inundation criteria." 10. Amend Section 4.1.8 Maintenance to read: "Grass-lined channels must be designed with maintainability in mind. See Section 3.2.8 for the District's Maintenance Eligibility Guidelines,which also provide guidance for elements of design that permit good maintenance of these installations. Weld County and the design engineer shall work together to provide access to all major drainageways as determined appropriate at the time of preliminary and final design." 11. Amend the fifth paragraph of Section 4.2.2 Design Procedure to read: "Water surface profiles shall be computed for all open channels conveying > 50 cfs within Weld County. Computation of the water surface profile should utilize standard backwater methods, taking into consideration all losses due to changes in velocity, drops, bridge openings, and other obstructions. Computations begin at a known point and extend in an upstream direction for subcritical flow. It is for this reason that the channel should be designed from a downstream direction to an upstream direction. It is necessary to show the energy gradient on all preliminary drawings to help prevent errors. Whether or not the energy gradient line is shown on the final drawings is the option of the reviewing agency but is encouraged by the District." 12. Add the following to the last paragraph of Section 4.2.2 Design Procedure: "Hydraulic grade lines shall be shown on the final drawing profiles of open channels conveying>50 cfs within the Weld County. Energy grade lines on final drawing profiles are encouraged. Hydraulic grade lines on Final Construction Drawings are encouraged to ease assessment and review of compliance with street inundation criteria." 13. Amend second paragraph of Section 4.2.3 Life Expectancy and Maintenance to read: ".Weld County and the design engineer shall work together to provide access to all major drainageways as determined appropriate at the time of preliminary and final design. 14. Amend the second paragraph of Section 4.3 Concrete-Lined Channels to read: "Concrete-lined channels can be used for conveyance of both subcritical and supercritical flows. In general, however, other types of channels such as grass-lined channels or channels with wetland bottoms are preferred for 11111111111111111 IIII1111111 IIII1111111 III HIE IIII 2006-3124 3439172 12/04/2006 02:25P Weld County, CO ORD2006-7 16 of 65 R 0.00 D 0.00 Steve Moreno Clerk& Recorder subcritical flows. The use of a concrete-lined channel for subcritical flows should not be used except in unusual circumstances where a narrow right- of-way exists. Vegetated channels are normally preferable in Weld County because available thalweg slopes are generally steep enough. 15. Amend the fourth paragraph of Section 4.3 Concrete-Lined Channels to read: "In Weld County, all channels carrying supercritical flow shall be lined with continuously reinforced concrete linings, both longitudinally and laterally. There shall be no diminution of wetted area cross sections at bridges or culverts. Adequate freeboard shall be provided to have a suitable safety margin. Bridges or other structures crossing the channel must be anchored satisfactorily to withstand the full dynamic load that might be imposed upon the structure in the event of major trash plugging." 16. Amend Section 4.3.6 Maintenance to read: "Concrete channels require periodic maintenance including debris and sediment removal, patching, joint repair, and other such activities. Their condition should be periodically monitored, especially to assure that flows cannot infiltrate beneath the concrete lining. Weld County and the design engineer shall work together to provide access to all major drainageways as determined appropriate at the time of preliminary and final design." 17. Amend Section 4.4.1.3 Wire-Enclosed Rock (Gabions) to read: "Wire-enclosed rock, or gabions, refers to rocks that are bound together in a wire basket so that they act as a single unit. The durability of wire- enclosed rock is generally limited by the life of the galvanized binding wire that has been found to vary considerably under conditions along waterways. Water carrying sand or gravel will reduce the service life of the wire dramatically. Water that rolls or otherwise moves cobbles and large stones breaks the wire with a hammer-and-anvil action,considerably shortening the life of the wire. The wire has been found to be susceptible to corrosion by various chemical agents and is particularly affected by high-sulfate soils. Wire-enclosed rock installations have been found to attract vandalism, and flat mattress surfaces seem to be particularly susceptible to having wires cut and stones removed. For these reasons,Weld County discourages the use of wire-enclosed rock. If the designer chooses to utilize gabions, they should be placed above the low-flow channel or 2-year water surface elevation. All flat mattresses must be filled with topsoil and then covered with a 6-inch layer of topsoil." 18. Amend Section 4.4.7 Maintenance to read: "Weld County and the design engineer shall work together to provide access to all major drainageways as determined appropriate at the time of preliminary and final design. Requirements for District maintenance eligibility are reviewed in Section 3.2.8 of this chapter. Of particular concern is long- term loss of riprap, particularly due to the public moving the rock(for smaller 11111111111111111 IIII 1111111 LIMO III HID III IIII 2006-3124 3439172 12/04/2006 02:25P Weld County, CO 7 ORD2006-7 17 of 65 R 0.00 0 0.00 Steve Moreno Clerk& Recorder sizes). Grout can deteriorate with time, and this should be monitored, as well. Improper grout installation creates long-term maintenance problems." 19. Amend Section 4.5 Bioengineered Channels to read: "Bioengineered channels(see Photographs MD-10 and MD-11)emphasize the use of vegetative components in combination with structural measures to stabilize and protect stream banks from erosion. Weld County advocates the integration of bioengineering techniques into drainage planning,design, and construction when the use of such channels is consistent with Weld County's policies concerning flow carrying capacity, stability, maintenance, and enhancement of the urban environment and wildlife habitat. The following discussion on bioengineered channels interfaces closely with Section 4.2,Wetland Bottom Channels, and Section 4.6, Natural Channels; designers are encouraged to read Sections 4.2, 4.5 and 4.6, concurrently. In addition, because bioengineered channels require some structural assistance to maintain stability in urban settings, the designer is referred to guidance on drop structures in the HYDRAULIC STRUCTURES chapter." 20. Amend Section 4.5.3 Bioengineering Resources to read: "The purpose of this section is to provide the designer with an overview of bioengineering and basic guidelines for the use of bioengineered channels on major drainage projects within Weld County. There are many sources of information on bioengineering that the designer should consult for additional information when planning and designing a bioengineered channel (Watson, Biedenharn, and Scott 1999; USFISRWG 1998; Riley 1998; and Biedenharn, Elliot, and Watson 1997)." 21. Amend the first two paragraphs of Section 4.5.4 Characteristics of Bioengineered Channels to read: "The following characteristics are generally associated with bioengineered channels: 1. Their design must address the hydrologic changes associated with urbanization (increased peak discharges, increased runoff volume, increased base flow, and increased bank-full frequency). These changes typically necessitate the use of grade control structures. In the absence of grade control structures, especially in the semi-arid climate of Weld County,purely bioengineered channels will normally be subject to bed and bank erosion, channel instability, and degradation. 2. In addition to grade controls, bioengineered channels may require some structural methods to assist the vegetation with maintaining channel stability. Examples include buried riprap on toes and outer channel banks (see Figures MD-16, MD-17 and MD-18)." 1 111111 11111 11111 111111111 1111 1111111II1111111II11111 2006-3124 3439172 12/04/2006 02:25P Weld County, CO 18 of 65 R 0.00 O 0.00 Steve Moreno Clerk& Recorder ORD2006-7 22. Add the following to the last paragraph of Section 4.5.4 Characteristics of Bioengineered Channels: "Weld County is open to review and accept alternate bioengineering methods that provide protection to toe of bank slopes (i.e. jacks and lunkers, etcetera)." 23. Amend the first paragraph of Section 4.5.5 Advantages of Bioengineered Channels to read: "Public reaction to bioengineered channels is generally favorable, not only in northern Colorado, but also regionally and nationally. In contrast to major drainageway stabilization projects that focus on structural measures, such as concrete-lined or riprap-lined channels, bioengineered channels:" 24. Amend subparagraph 6 of Section 4.5.5 Advantages of Bioengineered Channels to read: "6. Create a living system that will strengthen over time." 25. Add the following to Section 4.5.5 Advantages of Bioengineered Channels: "8. Are less costly to maintain." 26. Amend the first paragraph of Section 4.5.6 Technical Constraints to read: "The following constraints may be associated with bioengineered channels: 1. There is only limited experience to rely on for successful design of urban channels. The majority of the experience with bioengineering techniques relates to channels in nonurban settings. 2. The semi-arid conditions that characterize Weld County can be at odds with the need for an adequate water supply for maintaining the vegetation. Careful species selection that reflects the site's soils and water availability characteristics is essential. 3. A basic design criterion within Weld County is to demonstrate channel stability during the major (1OO-year) storm, due to public safety and property protection concerns within urban areas. There is little evidence (locally, regionally, or nationally) as to whether purely bioengineered channels can withstand 1OO-year (or lesser) flood forces. No Change to remainder of paragraph. 27. Amend the second paragraph of Section 4.5.6 Technical Constraints to delete the sixth bulleted item. 28. Amend the second paragraph of Section 4.5.6 Technical Constraints to amend the last bulleted item to read: "Many of these problems may be avoided through selection of the appropriate type and species of vegetation. Such selections and expert advice must be obtained from qualified individuals in revegetation and bioengineering." IIIIII VIII VIII I'll Illllll IIII IIIIIII III VIII' III IIII 9 2 O6 O6-7 3439172 12/04/2006 02:25P Weld County, CO 19 of 65 R 0.00 D 0.00 Steve Moreno Clerk& Recorder 29. Amend the first two paragraphs of Section 4.6 Natural Channels to read: "Natural waterways in Weld County are sometimes in the form of steep- banked gulches, which have eroding banks and bottoms. On the other hand, many natural waterways exist in urbanized and to-beurbanized areas, which have mild slopes, are reasonably stable, and are not currently degrading. If the channel will be used to carry storm runoff from an urbanized area, it can be assumed that the changes in the runoff regime will increase channel erosion and instability. Careful hydraulic analysis is needed to address this projected erosion. In most cases, stabilization of the channel will be required. Stabilization using bioengineering techniques, described in Section 4.5 of this chapter, has the advantage of preserving and even enhancing the natural character and functions of the channel. Some structural stabilization measures will also be required in combination with the bioengineered stabilization measures. In Weld County, most natural waterways will need drops and/or erosion cutoff check structures to maintain a mild channel slope and to control channel erosion. Typically, these grade control structures are spaced to limit channel degradation to what is expected to be the final stable longitudinal slope after full urbanization of the tributary watershed. In the Denver area, this slope, depending on watershed size and channel soils, has been observed to range from 0.2 to 0.6%, with the South Platte River itself approaching a slope of 0.1%. Whenever feasible, natural channels should be kept in as near a natural condition as possible by limiting modifications to those necessary to protect against the destabilizing hydrologic forces caused by urbanization." 30. Amend the fifth paragraph of Section 4.6 Natural Channels to read: "The following design criteria are recommended when evaluating natural channels: 1. The channel and overbank floodplain should have adequate capacity for the 100-year flood. 2. A water surface profile should be defined in order to identify the 100- year floodplain, to control earthwork, and to build structures in a manner consistent with Weld County's floodplain regulations and ordinances." No change to remainder of section. Section 8-11-40. Weld County Addendum to the Text of the Urban Storm Drainage Criteria - Volume 2 A. Chapter 8 - Hydraulic Structures. 1. Add the following to Section 4.1.2 Bridge Opening Freeboard: "The bridge low chord elevation shall be a minimum of 1-foot above the 100-year water course energy grade line." B. Chapter 9 - Culverts 11111111111111111111111111111111111111III1111111111111 2006-3124 3439172 12/04/2006 02:25P Weld County, CO ORD2006-7 20 of 65 R 0.00 0 0.00 Steve Moreno Clerk& Recorder 1. Amend the third paragraph of Section 1.1.2 Headwater to read: " The maximum culvert headwater to diameter ratios are: STORM FREQUENCY HEADWATER TO DIAMETER 10-Year HW/D < 1.0 100-Year HW/D < 1.5 The minimum culvert capacities are: STREET MINIMUM CAPACITY CLASSIFICATION (RECURRENCE INTERVAL) Local 10-Year Collector 10-Year Arterial 10-Year When the flow in a roadside ditch exceeds the capacity of the culvert and overtops the cross street,the flowoverthe street crown shall not exceed the minor storm and major storm depth limits presented in Chapter 3, Planning, Section 9.4 of the Weld County Storm Drainage Criteria manual. Weld County may require additional culvert capacity in order to prevent flooding of adjacent properties." 2. Add the following to Section 2.1.1 Energy and Hydraulic Grade Lines: "The hydraulic grade line and energy grade line shall be determined for each culvert system and included in the Final Drainage Report. Each culvert system shall be profiled on the Final Construction Drawings and shall include the design flow hydraulic grade line." 3. Amend Section 3.5.3 Culvert Diameter to read: "It is the policy of Weld County to require a minimum culvert diameter of 15 inches. Weld County may require additional culvert capacity in order to prevent flooding of adjacent properties. After the invert elevations have been assumed and using the design computation forms(e.g., Figure CU-8), the capacity charts (e.g., Figure CU-7), and the nomographs,the diameter of pipe that will meet the headwater requirements should be determined. Since small diameter pipes are often plugged by sediment and debris, it is recommended that pipe smaller than 18 inches not be used for any drainage where this Manual applies. Refer to the "Weld County Design and Construction Standards and Specifications", latest edition,for allowable culvert pipe materials. The Manning's roughness coefficient"n" for all culvert pipe sizing calculations shall be 0.013 regardless of pipe material (Concrete, PVC, or HDPE) with the exception of corrugated metal pipes which shall have a coefficient of 0.025." 1111111111D lilt III 1111111 Ell IIIIII III IIIIIII II It 2006-3124 1,2/04/2006 02:25P Weld County, CO 231439017265 R 0.00 0 0.00 Steve Moreno Clerk& Recorder 2006-3 24 4. Add the following to the last paragraph of Section 4.1 Projecting Inlets: "At a minimum, a culvert entrance and outlet shall include a flared end section. Erosion protection (riprap, etcetera) may be required." 5. Amend the fifth paragraph of Section 8.0 Trash/Safety Racks to read: "Weld County strongly recommends against the installation of trash racks at culvert outlets, because debris or a person carried into the culvert will impinge against the rack, thus leading to pressurized conditions within the culvert, virtually destroying its flow capacity and creating a greater hazard to the public or a person trapped in the culvert than not having one." 6. Amend Section 8.1 Collapsible Gratings to read: "Weld County does not recommend the use of collapsible gratings. On larger culverts where a collapsible grating is deemed necessary by a local jurisdiction or an engineer, such gratings must be carefully designed from the structural standpoint so that collapse is achieved with a hydrostatic load of perhaps one-half of the maximum backwater head allowable. Collapse of the trash rack should be such that it clears the waterway opening adequately to permit the inlet to function properly without itself contributing to potential plugging of the culvert." C. Chapter 10 - Storage 1. Add the following subparagraph to the sixth paragraph of Section 2.0 Application Of Different Types Of Storage: "6. Above ground parking lot detention ponds may be utilized when land area for a grassed lined detention pond is not available. To prevent damage to and floatation of automobiles,parking lot detention ponds shall not exceed 12 inches in depth at any point. Parking lot detention ponds shall have signage to inform the general public about the potential for flooding. The 100-year water surface elevation of a parking lot detention pond shall not encroach into a public street." 2. Amend Section 3.1.2 Use of Regional (i.e., Hydrograph Routing) Detention Sizing Procedure to read: "For tributary catchments larger than 90 acres in size, Weld County recommends or may require the use of hydrograph flood routing procedures (i.e.,using CUHP-generated hydrographs and reservoir routing calculations, see Section 3.4). In addition, if there are upstream detention facilities in the watershed, hydrograph routing methods should be employed. If off-site tributary areas contribute runoff to an on-site detention facility, the total tributary area, assuming fully developed off-site land uses, must be included in the sizing of the on-site storage volumes in order to account for the total runoff volume in the watershed. Sizing of detention storage volumes shall utilize outflow hydrographs that have been properly calculated to account for variable head discharge rates." #1117121111211011412161IIIIIII IIII IIIIIIIIII!relik0la, 2006-3124 3ORD2006-7 22 of 65 R 0.00 ° 0.00 Steve Moreno Cl Recor er 3. Add the following to Section 3.1.3 Water Quality Capture Volume in Sizing Detention Storage: "Within Weld County, the water quality capture volume shall be considered a portion of the total 100-year detention pond volume." 4. Amend first paragraph of Section 3.2.1 Maximum Allowable Unit Release Rates for On-Site Facilities to read: "The maximum allowable unit release rates per acre for on-site detention facilities for a number of design return periods are listed in Table SO-1. These rates apply unless other rates are recommended in a Weld County-approved master plan." 5. Amend Section 3.2.2 Empirical Equations for the Sizing of On-Site Detention Storage Volumes to read: "Urbonas and Glidden (1983), as part of the District's ongoing hydrologic research, conducted studies that evaluated peak storm runoff flows along major drainageways. The following set of empirical equations provided preliminary estimates of on-site detention facility sizing for areas within Weld County. They are not intended for use when off-site inflows are present or when multi-stage controls are to be used (e.g., 10- and 100-year peak control)at the storage facility. In addition, these equations are not intended to replace detailed hydrologic and flood routing analysis, or even the analysis using the Rational Formula-based FAA method for the sizing of detention storage volumes. The District does not promote the use of these empirical equations. It does not object, however, to their use by local governments who have adopted them or want to adopt them as minimum requirements for the sizing of on-site detention for small catchments within their jurisdiction. Where Weld County has a master drainage plan that contains specific guidance for detention storage or sizing of on-site detention facilities, those guidelines should be followed instead. The empirical equations are as follows:..." Remainder of Section - No Change. 6. Amend Section 3.2.4 Multi-Level Control to read: "Weld County recommends that no more than two levels of controls, in addition to the WQCV controls, be used for on-site detention facilities. These levels should be the 100-year storm, in combination with the 10-year storm. More levels of control may appear to provide increased protection, but the added complexity of design and the questionable accuracy of the extended precision for such requirements rarely justify their use. Design Example 6.1 shows calculations of allowable release rate and storage requirement using empirical equations." 7. Add the following to Section 3.3 Design Storms for Sizing Storage Volumes: "The 10-year and 100-year storms shall be the design storms for all water quality and detention pond designs, respectively, within Weld County." 8. Amend Section 3.3.2 Drainage and Flood Control to read: 111111111111111111111111111111111111111III1111111II1111 2006-3124 3439172 12/04/2006 02:25P Weld County, CO ORD2006-7 23 of 65 R 0.00 D 0.00 Steve Moreno Clerk& Recorder "Sizing of storage facilities and outlet works for flood control purposes is generally based on whether the facility is on-site or regional. For an individual development site, local municipalities will often dictate the on-site detention design storms that need to be addressed by the new development.On a watershed level,full system master planning studies are needed to identify the appropriate release rates for various design storms. Thus, whenever a Weld-County approved master plan recommends detention sites and release rates or on-site detention/retention storage and release rates, those rates should be used in final design of detention/retention facilities. Other considerations that have to be taken into account include downstream system stability, the stream's capacity to convey discharges from the detention/retention facility in combination with the downstream runoff contributions to the drainage system, potential for flood damages to downstream properties, and other factors that may be specific to each situation at hand." 9. Add the following to Section 3.3.3 Spillway Sizing: "Each detention pond shall contain an emergency spillway capable of conveying the peak 100-year storm discharge draining into the detention pond. The invert of the emergency spillway shall be set equal to or above the 100-year water surface elevation. The depth of flow out the emergency spillway shall be<6 inches and the spillway shall have effective erosion protection." 10. Amend Section 3.3.4 Retention Facilities to read: "When a retention basin is proposed as a temporary solution to an evolving drainage problem, Weld County recommends that it be sized to capture, as a minimum, the runoff equal to 1.5 times the 24-hour, 100-year storm plus 1-foot freeboard. The facility also has to be situated and designed so that when it overtops, no human-occupied or critical structures (e.g., electrical vaults)will be flooded, and no catastrophic failure at the facility(e.g., loss of dam embankment) will occur. It is also recommended that retention facilities be as shallow as feasible to encourage infiltration and other losses of the captured urban runoff. When a trickle outflow can be accepted downstream, one shall be provided and sized in accordance with the locally approved release rates,preferably capable of emptying the full volume in 10 to 14 days. Weld County will not approve any detention or retention pond that does not drain in less than 72 hours, or causes injury to water rights, or is in violation of State or Federal law." 11. Amend subparagraph #2 of Section 3.4 Reservoir Routing of Storm Hydrographs for Sizing of Storage Volumes to read: "2. Determine Hydrology: Determine the inflow hydrograph to the storage basin and the allowable peak discharge from the basin for the design storm events. The hydrograph may be available in Weld County Master Drainage Plans or Updates. The allowable peak discharge is limited by the local criteria or by the requirements spelled out in a Weld County-approved master plan." 2006-3124 131911117121121101141/21010161 ` �y ORD2006-7 24 of 65 R 0.00 0.00 Steve Moreno Clerk& Recor er 12. Amend subparagraph #3 of Section 3.4.1 Initial Sizing to read: " The outflow rate Qo (cfs) calculated as: 1' iSi�•1 0 tfr in which Qpo is the peak outflow rate. The allowable peak outflow rate is determined from a Weld County master plan, local ordinance, or other considerations described in Section 3.3.2." 13. Amend Section 3.4.2 Initial Shaping to read: "The initial shaping of the storage basin provides a starting point for defining the stage-storage relationship. The stage-storage relationship will be refined during preliminary and final design phases of the project. The initial shaping is easiest when regular geometry (such as a triangle or rectangle) is used for approximation. The detention volume needed for any specific design storm is combined with site constraints (e.g., size or depth limitations, number of control stages, etc.) and the simplified formulas describing the basin geometry in order to develop an initial depth, length, and width for the basin. Design spreadsheets can be used to assist in preliminary shaping of the storage facility. Weld County does not encourage the use of storage facilities with uniform, geometric properties. To the contrary,Weld County encourages designers to collaborate with landscape architects to develop storage facilities that are attractive visually, fit into the fabric of the landscape, and enhance the overall character of an area. However, using regular geometry can approximate initial shaping of a non- uniformly shaped facility." 14. Amend Section 4.0 Final Design Considerations to read: "Final design of a storage facility should recognize the kinds of considerations described in this section. It is beyond the scope of this Manual to provide detailed dam design guidance. There are many excellent references in this regard such as Design of Small Dams (U.S. Bureau of Reclamation 1987). Weld County urges all designers to review and adhere to the guidance in such references because the failure of even small embankments can have serious consequences for the public. General guidelines for the final design phase of detention or retention facilities follows." 15. Amend Section 4.3 Geometry of Storage Facilities to read: "The geometry of a storage facility depends on specific site conditions such as adjoining land uses, topography, geology, preserving/creating wildlife habitat, volume requirements, etc. Several key features should be incorporated in all storage facilities located within Weld County(see Figure SO-6). These include (a) 4:1 or flatter side slopes of all banks, (b) low-flow or trickle-flow channel unless a permanent pool takes its place, (c)forebay, (d) pond bottom sloped at least 1 percent to drain toward the low-flow or 1111111111111111 IIII 1111111 IIII 1111111 III 1111111111111 4 ORD60 2006-312 124 3439172 12/04/2006 02:25P Weld County, CO 25 of 65 R 0.00 D 0.00 Steve Moreno Clerk& Recorder trickle-flow channel or the outlet, and (e) emergency spillway with erosion protection designed to safely convey the 100-year overtopping flows." 16. Amend subparagraph #2 of Section 4.4 Embankments and Cut Slopes to read: "2. Freeboard—The elevation of the top of the embankment shall be a minimum of 1 foot above the 100-year water surface elevation in the detention pond. When relevant, all SEO dam safety criteria must be carefully considered when determining the freeboard capacity of an impoundment." 17. Add the following two subparagraphs to Section 4.4 Embankments and Cut Slopes: "5. Emergency Spillway Downstream Protection-In order to protect the emergency spillway from catastrophic erosion failure, buried riprap shall be placed from the emergency spillway downhill to the embankment toe of slope and covered with 6 inches of topsoil. The riprap shall be sized at the time of final engineering design. Grouting of the riprap may be required. 6. Concrete Cutoff Wall -A concrete cutoff wall, 8 inches thick, 3 foot deep, extending 5 feet into the embankment beyond the emergency spillway opening, is encouraged on all private detention ponds and required on all publicly-owned regional detention ponds. A concrete cutoff wall will permanently define the emergency spillway opening. The emergency spillway elevation shall be tied back into the top of embankment using a maximum slope of 4:1." 18. Add the following to Section 4.7 Outlet Works: "The outlet pipe of regional detention ponds shall contain a minimum of two (2) concrete cutoff walls embedded a minimum of 18 inches into undisturbed earthen soil. The cutoff walls shall be a minimum of 8 inches thick. The outlet pipe bedding material shall consist of native earthen soil and not granular bedding material to at least the first downstream manhole or daylight point." 19. Add the following to Section 4.8 Trash Racks: "For safety reasons, trash rack angles are to be 3 horizontal to 1 vertical (3:1) or flatter per Urban Drainage research (Nelson & Kroeger, 2005)." 20. Add the following subparagraph to Section 4.10 Operation and Maintenance: "15. An operations maintenance manual for each water quality pond, detention pond, and outlet structure facility shall be developed and provided to the Weld County Department of Public Works and the development Homeowners' Association at the time of final submittal." 1111111 1411111 1111111 1111 11111 III 1111111 11111 2006-3124 3439172 12/04/2006 02:25P Weld County, C0 ORD2006-7 26 of 65 R 0.00 D 0.00 0 Steve Moreno Clerk& Recorder 21. Add the following to Section 4.11 Access: "Drivable access applies only to Regional Detention facilities within Weld County. Each regional detention pond will be considered on a case-by-case basis at the time of final design." 22. Add the following as the third paragraph of Section 5.0 Criteria For District Maintenance Eligibility: "Regional Master Planned detention ponds, designed and constructed by or on behalf of Weld County, shall be owned and maintained by County as specified in the applicable Development Agreement(s). All other detention ponds shall be considered privately owned and privately maintained." D. Chapter 11 - Flood Proofing 1. Amend the second paragraph of Section 1.2.1 Classification of Flood Proofing to read: "In Weld County, flood-proofing efforts should focus on permanent measures due to the rapid response of most of the Front Range stream systems. Contingent measures are more effective when combined with an early flood warning system or in areas not immediately adjacent to a stream channel." 2. Amend Section 4.1.1 Determine Flood Hazards to read: "Information about flooding in the area is available from Weld County officials or directly from FEMA at:http://www.msc.fema.gov/hardcopy.shtml. Local officials, design professionals, and contractors can use this information,along with theflood hazard information developed by FEMA and other agencies and organizations, to provide advice about retrofitting options." 3. Amend the first paragraph of Section 4.1.3 Contact Local Officials to read: "Weld County officials have copies of the FIS and FIRM published for the community by FEMA. Weld County officials can determine whether a building is in the regulatory floodplain and, if so, the FPE at the location of the building." E. Chapter 12 - Revegetation 1. Amend Section 1.0 Introduction to read: "This chapter provides information on methods and plant materials needed for revegetation of drainage facilities within Weld County. Establishment of a robust cover of vegetation is critical to the proper functioning of drainage structures such as grass-lined channels, detention basins, retention ponds, and wetlands. Vegetation serves multiple purposes, including stabilization of structures to prevent excessive erosion and removal of pollutants in stormwater. The semi-arid nature of the climate, prevalence of introduced weeds, and variety of soil types encountered in Weld County virtually mandate prompt implementation of a revegetation plan to achieve revegetation success." MIMEO IIII 1IIIII IIII 1111111 III 1111111111111 2006-3124 3439172 12/04/2006 02:25P Weld County, CO ORD2006-7 27 of 65 R 0.00 0 0.00 Steve Moreno Clerk& Recorder 2. Add the following to the last paragraph of Section 2.0 Scope of This Chapter and Relation to Other Relevant Documents: "See revisions to RV tables included in this chapter for Weld County-specific seed mix recommendations." 3. Add the following as a bulleted item of Section 3.2 Site Preparation: ". Before revegetation work is started, an inventory of vegetation should be taken. If noxious weeds, as listed in Weld County Code, Chapter 15, exist on-site, appropriate steps need to be taken before, during, and after work is completed, to control their spread. Contact the Weld County Department of Public Works Weed Division Supervisor at 970-304-6496 for additional information if needed." 4. Add the following as a bulleted item of Section 3.3 Seeding and Planting: • Seed mixtures should be coated with Mycorrhiza at the rate of 2 pounds per acre at the time of seeding. If mulching with straw, be sure the straw is seed free and weed free." 5. Amend the second and third bulleted items of Section 3.4 Maintenance to read: • Access to and grazing on recently revegetated areas should be limited with temporary fencing and signage while plants are becoming established (for 1 to 2 years at least). • Weed infestations should be managed using appropriate physical or chemical, or biological methods as soon as possible." 6. Add the following as the last bulleted item of 3.4 Maintenance: • The project owner/developer, not Weld County, will be responsible for site maintenance until vegetative establishment." 7. Amend the first paragraph of Section 4.2 Soil Amendments to read: "Native topsoil should be stripped and saved for revegetation. If this is not appropriate due to poor soil quality or for some other reason, then subsoil can be made conducive for plant growth through the use of amendments. Since soil pH is typically suitable within Weld County, amendments are usually needed for increasing organic matter content or providing nutrients in the form of fertilizers. Consideration should be given to importing topsoil, from the vicinity, instead of amending poor quality subsoil, as this may be less expensive." 8. Amend the third paragraph of Section 4.2 Soil Amendments to read: "Detailed information on the types and amounts of soil amendments and fertilizers needed is beyond the scope of this document and can be found in the documents previously referenced. However, information is provided on the use of humate soil conditioner and biosol fertilizer. Both of these 11111111111111111 IIII 1111111 IIII 1111111 III 1111111111111 2006-3124 3439172 12/04/2006 02:25P Weld County, CO ORD2006-7 28 of 65 R 0.00 0 0.00 Steve Moreno Clerk& Recorder materials are relatively new and show promise as soil conditioners and sources of slow-release fertilizers for revegetation work in Weld County." 9. Amend the second paragraph of Section 4.3 Recommended Seed Mixes to read: "Recommended seed mixes for the bottom (wet soils) and side slopes of drainage facilities within Weld County are included in Tables RV-1 and RV- 2. Mixes for different soil conditions in upland areas are provided in Tables RV-3 to RV-6. The seeding rates in these mixes are recommended minimum rates that should be used for drill seeding. These rates should be doubled for broadcast seeding and increased by 50% if a Brillion drill or hydro-seeding is used." 10. Add the following as the fourth paragraph of Section 4.3 Recommended Seed Mixes: "The inclusion of wild flowers in the seed mix is optional in Weld County. Areas seeded along Weld County roads may be spot sprayed by the county to control the spread of noxious weeds. This spraying may affect some wild flower species. Do not plant trees or shrubs in the County right-of-way." III VIII VIIIIIIIIIIIivi !!LrIlllllllll 1 439 7 651 104 0 000 D 0.00 Moreno lllllllll Clerk 29 ot 2006-3124 PAGE 29 ORD2006-7 11. Amend Table RV-1 as follows: Table RV/1—Recommended Seed Mix for High Water Table Conditions! Growth €,;row:h Ots Comae on Name flaiiety.i Scientific Name Sea$0 i Fo:f'I See:dafily E;S,Aun, R,2ctotht A:. 0s riff fir Warm Sod (!!7(!)(10!0 0_' swittiva si P;31hti:me r) Pdpici?1'ib`oa3't:P1 !Nat:n Sodlt:inca 389.000 2.2 N•a h,4,n whea t!~:ass to rl:a1 Posc0j.:oo a fflitni' Coo: Sod 110,000 7.9 Inland saltgra5i O:.! ./ 5$so:Sata Vt atm3 520.090 3+ 0 Wooly sedge C lr.x MP: i/Mad Cool SCA 400.00c: 0.1 t8i3 arc gall &mws r,aiticds Coo! .a. 109,30 .00-3 0.1. Prairie corddrass Sti3^omo Cpd.:dem d Cc!! Scsi 110000 ._0 2.4 'Nddfforders tflutlaCC Sunliower �ie!3:Xt!us no'tatld --- •- 250 000 G.I0 Wild brergals#ot Mod:[dd t7itiddd0 " .... t 450000 3.'i2 Yarrow ,40 5!a P?i39fOrti n 2,770.000 QW;'fi Ma?.V'E,rwlf:l 'eV l;ep:l tu10tiita .... _. 12 049 'For mend-el facilities located nea3+:1'Of:the b!Jftnm or where''Kett VAI r.,rdilios ucac. P3ard90 cf ps41ed rluaery stack wetland plans 2-foot or0centei is recommended J for sites with wedalnd hydrol v, Normat0'e. a. Delete the row containing Redtop (Agrostis alba). b. Delete the row containing Nuttall's sunflower (Holianthus nuttallii). 12. Amend Table RV-2 as follows: Table RV•2—Recommended Seed Mix tot Transition Areas' ,o,,it: ` o :_th m C00_10)00 Nal^.e tVarletyi SOiestiific Pinai!3 tee ssam, 50,07 .eo'0sa.b Pi.tf/'citt: Sheep fescue(Clete', Fet?cn oydi 0 Cool Ounch €00.000 W9slerl t;ha rd?ass Pasix3dyrutif,,.,i>ld Cool Sod '310.00'0 (Air iba) Aik3l!5'lColon Sp0(0?,Sius(3f?;-/des Warm eUn,.h 1.%Fie,0.".0 05 S:e:rie:r whsa:rs:aas Espies a'ddiiycauns s Coo! €Bunch Igo nna 55 Cr:nadiaf:b.i.iN'ass P4k;COMi resso Coo! Sod 2,500,000 00.3 f Ru,:ibi-,ns.3 Sr,itcl:gr:3s:i/Pgtt:iinde:i >'asnosan din,ythrrn 'f-'e!fn S00ihonch 000,00'. 1. 03 ft ilran1fel tlovea, GaSeiardta a::%Mils .. .... '132,000 '. 5 'P` r;>i,3:;:e COllet,,,,n,r R:Wt it tVWt na.•'is ... .... 1.'1.301 0M 4.2ti Purple.p:_“¢fra^.6rfwff P8(dkaSl!i37ur':i iaiiv.:rea 210.00 00 4.29 CEsileather Liii9is/mormta .._ .- 130.000 005 Add Limn—I;ieri'ibu .... ._. 293.000 020 rserdort Penn/doted Snit ... ,.1 c 20 i Y:iIIrAY i A t7i9a P9fle:ofiu ? .., .,•'70.CIQ4 (Ki i 1.14 t For skis elopes or between wet at'fm dry amen::. 890511:le 1 7 Ilia F9.:Jacle of eland i:a091053(i0Is!p;Ytila 0iicatai?n.solfy sails. '^A1:vnallee- 1111111111111111 IIII 111111111111111111 III 111111111 IIII 2006-3124 3439172 12/04/2006 02:25P Weld County, CO ORD2006-7 30 of 65 R 0.00 D 0.00 Steve Moreno Clerk& Recorder a. Delete the row containing Canadian bluegrass (Ruebens) (Poa compressa). b. Delete the row containing Flax* (Linum lewisii). 13. Amend Table RV-3 as follows: Table R1/•3•-•Recommendad Seed Mix for Alkali Soils Y,,.::! Growth Vas Cons-non Naoio Variels) Scientific Name .oa on • :ma Seed&i s; P.I_s!A-r;; .Alkali sacatom Spor oboists 7r;t1,(k'is Cccii Sancta 1.700.000 0.5 'treambank.wnealgras;. Agrcpymnoftaraxo Coo Sod 1;5.000 5.5 Sc.larl Inlan0 r.78 Tam; Distki,ti:;sPir 59 Warm Sad 020.000 1.7 Western wlied?gross(A.?riba1 Pascopywm.,mtut Sod 110.000 7.0 [Are grans(Hu hi a) C ii ciroslun,gra::::e V‘.:1.::: Sod 525.000 4,0 Suf`alo rays Bui:alee<taotykiCies Warm f5od 55000 20 bl+.'ild3cwerr, -, , Blanfet Sower GaigeoWe o'rta4 ... ::32 f000 i>25 Prairie coneftowor' Patibklc7 rarrrirs.ars .. .._ 1.220.000 X0.20 r n , . .... .... 210.0'0x0 0.20 rtlrP:e;::1131x1?L:OL'er P:itclr0.a:f?r.l:K`:;lii73.:XE?:7 C':'y ui t """ ' 'nofatd .... .... 120.000 0.55 Slue r:idx Linsya r2?w1.Sii ..2 252.000 0.25 Rocky kicram n Pens₹emon Pensaernon siriciu. _.. ._. 532.000 0.20 ,.._ Yarrow Ac!;1?Aa miatimum — -- '77UD�00 0 . 9.14 a. Delete the row containing Blue Flax (Linum lewisii). 14. Amend Table RV-4 as follows: Table RV-4—Recommended Seed Mix for Loamy Soils Crewe) t7mrdh its Gammon Name(Variodyl Srarrnlific Noire Season Foon San s11t: PLSJttr.rc, Snoop fescue tOrari r anrue;>aviim Coal Bunch 620.000 0.6 Cathy bluegrass PooC.arth Cool Bunch 520.000 05 Thickspike,xteat;;rae_: SMocr:7ocsorotus Cool Sod '51.000 _.. (Ci moo) Western wheatgi ass PcW ilynrat coSib, Cool Sod 11;•.09:1 70 Onto), £tl:ue glans Otani at CIl0i1<irnwgr!grno e . worm Sorirbunch 125.000 ,.. :Switlh(ra;:s(Pallhfi,,dCI) PriMc inn•oi^alai:: Warm Sod/bunch 3%32.000 ... Sided ts mama,,,mile, Baum;%:. r?inan:fi:4; L'.iarrr So-U ':Di,000 2 G 13.2 Wildflowers Slaiwc'l flower r30ac';i/S?,i;,sraui .... .... 332.000 0.2O Fro,':e conefloa99r REa2Icki r:Ciumn•s oo -_ 1.220,000 0.20 P urlrlo>prairie c o'.':r POurostsrran7 rxuiseva i -- ... 210.000 0 20 Clayfea aer Llools ja.0.;:ala __ .,_ 130.0(10 0.0e Flu ,1r)r???7 ie;Ti'Si! .... .... <b_.00O 0.20 Fedsle:9a' PAPSr&itY)f151003U i ^` ..- •92000 0.20 Yariow Ac1a11eu l>7`%ioPolhc'n i ...• ••• 2 770.000 (103 1.14 11111111111111111 III 1111111 till 1111111 III till 1111111/ 2006-3124 3439172 12/04/2006 02:25P Weld County, CO ORD2006-7 31 of 65 R 0.00 D 0.00 Steve Moreno Clerk & Recorder a. Delete the row containing Canby bluegrass (Poa canbyi). b. Delete the row containing Flax (Linum lewisii). 15. Amend Table RV-5 as follows: Table RV-5---Roeommended Seed Mix for Sandy Soils Growiti Crown: Lis: Common Nai i3!vlarind, 5rnianli£ic Nrime Se,isr1 Fomi Se o:Si3.lo PL$/Acr:? r i=elue crlana(liartiirs) i r.ittronctrissirry:(ru;ia ':'dorm Sodfurriur : 325,500 3.1 Little t:?delis>i::(Camt;e:9 Sc'i;zacr'il1!:?I Wan'; iifflci' 20).00':/ 3.0 i.sooputtwm Prairie tim d:eeo Catamertli`:lengilt�a Warn Sod _ 274 O00 _ 3.0 Sa;ld drn9lrs^.i :t.tporobsru.iry?l?:v:diiti IN ain't Bunch .__ _5.2'98.0;0 u�0.3—_. Sider:+13 grarsu:Vaud?:r.) Boireioaa oni1psn:.dada Mini Sotl?burich 101O00 5.5 'Westem'N.heaiii=ass Pascopynm stmt.ii Cool Scu 1t0.CL,rI 00 L4rnBa 22 ..___ ___._._..._..._. ' Ydt o:rowers 33anket flower -• ?32 DOE) 1 2< ..u.�!T"r1; .ryl;iii/?:? __ .....r Pfai:i:'i.afairikAlef .'rtihids C2?(i;INilie?!.. .... .., I.230000 0.20 Purple p wne GC'ver r lentt”niffr p spen&e: ... 210,000 0.20 'aayiea?Iter 1..M•7;.PiMetatc,r ... .-' '38.000 0.0:43 Flax ....,!...,:'rote: -• ... 293.000 0.2e :'ralst.emol Ff:i?i:i' no'i"',Cli!9 .... -. :':02000 n Yarrow Ach4Yrit?utretohiuO! 2770.050 5 05 1.14 a. Change 2.1 to 0.3 in Table RV-5. b. Change 0.3 to 2.1 in Table RV-5. c. Delete the row containing Flax (Linum lewisii). 16. Amend Table RV-7 as follows: Table RV-7—Wildf lower Mix(to he seeded with grass seed mix)1 Cootil,o9 Narrie(\eitigiyl 8:;.:ieritific,None F:c,:;><y Co-io:: $ee<1?:Y•_b to"a PLSsAc e Scae!et c8otenaibw .,tua?a?f alrea cG:ci^ea Red:or;inge 1500 f)00 0 0 91ue:tax lI?;dflr.;en'i•:i: B1A 203.000 0 1> Purfie(Ma;V:uEmn: Patclifk?int?kfRlpu;-pt;f>:.u1i? fied'Rurp!e 230.000 While prai4F.::over Pe:Faos.'eo;wn oar:clufor r Li^:ar- 3354.00e Caiitortita poppy &S<00'':?<yl2o2 C<v.k,miea i onind i 2'9:.,000 0.3 iilonkel Bower Gi,98,x40 iist?ta yeaewlred 1-'_.2,000 1.0 Frai:ie seta .Cal<?f=%?eeti&^gG•:' Violet 490,000 03 _ G 8 rl iaakeyed usaPU:.ffse 2?R 1,r2c7 �.-Yeilow 1,710.000 .�. 0.3 Puiple 4;i:ti lonee Er;bikB09:8 purpufeei Pufp;e 13.00:7 0.9 ;;grove irhliecf,,:iiefo3lrrrn W:kite 2,7i:1.030 '!.3 Qiay1e3t1ier £.liar,..A:.lnrfath £+.aSaii:urile 103..03 0 a Tota:' 0 1 This is a tai era3 mix tom.the OiSai0 it:a, ac ses eelive oe"ennilds'hie/do„e:I in a torict4,54 soil uioes is sunny ic<':ons. 111 1111111111 B 111111111111111111III1111111111111 2006-3124 3439172 12/04/2006 02:25P Weld County, CO 32 of 65 R 0.00 D 0.00 Steve Moreno Clerk& Recorder ORD2006-7 a. Delete the row containing Blue Flax (Linum lewisii). b. Delete the row containing California poppy (Eschscholtzia californica). c. Delete the row containing Blackeyed Susan (Rudbeckia hirta). 17. Amend Table RV-8 as follows: Table RV-B -•Rocommended Shrubs and Tree.1 s:aiey Colman Nair Stiar:ific Nan:e ednYd di) Sun/Shodd Zone YJrrcr; Shrubs Saskatoon Atf4ia,:C^:9r a;n:t<ke 3 15 Sun Uidasi Goad u;•a,tdiile serwcietein: Lead plan! Amor:inn lriocsfl -.6 Sun UplandCioag11 olerant ROW( U)1n.,ti£.wnth.:3 .. Son Upland Drought tcahin in rabbllbrusti liar,seos'aS Wald phial Pomas..4 on.rtnand ..2.0 S:u,atraade Tray ataZI, RJnne d: kata Chnkeched:y i@s,u vcgThana ' 20 Lordshade Trarsaior: r:arns a.ic.kets .:,t._.a>,lr:otl:≥u:acc Phu*Oiai%r'n 4�� 7 a....hnde 11≥.l:zat .Jo:z9 tn:v,iidllfte Gaicf ru1h suntan Rh:;a Si;ata:e- 2 , So:,%shade Upland 0:cx,r4 c.tales;::. Wax currant Rinss LYiier'.rn .. r Sprishade Transition Good f:li-wkaau Recaoaierdraoazood Cr'-sus ateio,;f sa . _.c Spade ypeik4jad Dro:ny,F olerant Sao{•_Caruiilow ° 'Ox exippa 6 - 7D Sun Tiansitan Req:-;ires more or wetland water Snewberr'y Sprrprionearpos 2 Silnishede Transition Prefer:'I:ioh:3 area 9!aw/Mi'n'i Sparst,bsyoi ml Yucca glades ,...2 Sun Upland D:.dp ht t aeraP'. Woods Mk" Rosa roods! -...s Sun Upland Estr.8:s ies q:alLldy GilvEil_utfi315perry 3t.'6U7?^%dn,w dmazz, E_1,? 138b Upland Urougth tcleralii Trees `Jan ow icier r'a?r its or.:;us0/oils 10-.an Sun Tiansilian Requires mule coduawiui1 or wetland water Piaui calloriwwoaLt Poogililu i.'an<ude.s Y? Son 3ranS 11011 kaodn 1r more ._.__—_......._.___.._.........._._—_..........____......_—._•_— wale_ o:a:y I4loui trit .Juppae/I a �,..': St43_—.—Upliilla ._D uugh `Irrar .^. j r.aa:er ,ia':J,a"R':+elrl.rnf Coid:ado Lnoe f;rpv.). r t;,ia 3o., 19D `3:n Tiansltian Fte,a:,A3es more Spruce water Ponderosa pins,, Piauc oonii4M.sa 75 .1.00 Sun UOland Droputat tolerant I React ,Foath,oiaonv &tax dflthvieideilda 15--30 Star elia :d Req'.rrdeorodie water 1 Teas and,hrobs shaiial not be pi'filed in To bottoms of drawn fie obarnols or wh.aa;they coin. Inoaac aavi and uecie ase chatnei Opacity 11 it ftco mended thin cantainerir tin S100k re.s..2-q ulYir. Scalion)ee used rer trees end shr.:Cs. a. Delete..the row containing Rubber rabbitbrush (Chrysothamnus nauseosus). b. Delete the row containing Spanish bayonet (Yucca glauca). I IIIIII VIII 1111111111111111 IIII 1111111 III 11111 iIII 1111 3439172 12/04/2006 02:25P Weld County, CO 33 of 65 R 0.00 D 0.00 Steve Moreno Clerk& Recorder 2006-3124 PAGE 33 ORD2006-7 18. Amend Table RV-9 as follows: Table RV-9.---Recommended Plants for Constructed Wetlands and Retention Pond Shelf' Dea°3i of Water(a? Of:hi:non N::Tie S ieatilic:lisle Notes 0-3.5 Soil stem bu!r:a:h &X7)5S F'36tritS .anteri plants Al:o:tat th9d stem t%4!tush tticitrtXt3t 8Cl:Ii.ti .. 'xflrl FrllJri:waltar huo'wheod .;<vitaterta fltl:xlp, • ;:an#will i::.alrl:, f:ikFdi burnSh ` -coI?!i i?13mmi5 deeper water with Wile CSinlii:t teet! P0iiV00ilfr Dgr3i:ZU3≤t 0.2 -0.5 Tia'ee^sisuaie Sceptic;a.4:ePca/!iis • X:u:tleay platitsorroijid Sal tt rush Etta:chants,siostrs extend above water D 0...5 Rice cut grass Lea?si:i ory1!ids,'.> . iattecieit will adyat.it tc• Nebraska Se¢dhe Corn fw1??ii c.asLX foCiitu,e toti0?110:1S Sion ra5'. ./0(;0:;:3eii sFe1 whit time Banc.ri:Sh .“?`CU*:s411tfCos 7Mray .nn: ..?'!Cos fwli i.yl Fariail barley Horde!:cc; -our s yie yyhi above riffiT:I ii--1 tai:k'o:ae0 A lif.71(ipkif,iOC;uN%:iC 0..3 S`.'tit':ngrass P3p;c,;ar 5:8 iii?F7: • iTtest atant neat Ptaa!e o>rdgrass $eactr!spec;t:ue.ty wate,tenets,soil is wet Gesbairn h°t.:Pc/a t„atasta • C01ath)!,'+alflower 5 It is recce,nlnendeu that contronetized stock be used for wettaric p'-anli?:gs. it 3s riot recornrt!el`ded t?,ut oattaris he plslrred since trrey will invade:saw ally a. Delete the row containing Smart weed (Polygonum persicaria). b. Delete the row containing Foxtail barley (Hordeum jubatum). 19. Add the following to Section 4.4 Trees, Shrubs and Wetland Plantings: "GRASS SEEDING RECOMMENDATIONS FOR WELD COUNTY GENERAL INFORMATION 1. If a species is listed as "15% to 30%" in mixture, please use a percentage within the given parameters to arrive at the amount used in the seed mix. 2. The numbers listed in the "Seeding Rate- Dryland"column is to be used for most dryland sites in this area. The amounts listed in "Seeding Rate- Irrigated"are to be used for those areas that will be irrigated, or sites that are highly erodible. 3. A seed mix is complete when a combination of the species chosen totals 100%. 4. The recommended varieties column lists the preferred varieties that are known to do well in this area. If this column is blank, refer to a local seed dealer for recommendations on varieties. 1 111111 11111 11111 llll 1111111 11111111111 III VIII IIII I'll 3439172 12/04/2006 02:25P Weld County, CO 2006-3124 34 of 65 R 0.00 D 0.00 Steve Moreno Clerk& Recorder O4 ORD2006-7 TO OBTAIN DESIRED SEED MIX 1. Refer to the appropriate range site, defined in the local soil survey. 2. Chose the species within each range site. Names in bold italics represent the preferred species for each site. 3. If the range of percentage in the mix column lists "up to 45%" then chose an amount of the species to use in the mix that correlates within this range. 4. Take the percentage of each species used in the mix and multiple by the seeding rate. a. Example: 1) Site is a dryland site. 2) Sand bluestem at 8.0 pounds of PLS/Acre is used at 25% in the seed mix. 3) Take 25% x 8.0 = 2.0 pounds of Sand bluestem to use in the mix per acre. 4) Multiple the 2.0 pounds by the number of acres to get the total amount of pounds of the species to use for the mix. b. NOTE: The seeding rates are listed in Pounds of Pure Live Seed (PLS) per acre, and not in bulk pounds. Refer to the following tables for grass seeding recommendations. I Illlll 11111 11111 1111 1111111 1111 1111111 111 11111 1111 1111 er 3439172 12104120 35 of 65 ft 0.00 a 0.00 Steve Moreno C e 2006-3124 PAGE 35 ORD2006-7 Table RV-10 GRASS SEEDING TABLES BASED ON RANGE SITES Species indicated in bold italics indicates the preferred species RANGE SITE: Deed Sands, Choppy Sands, Sandy Bottomland, Sandy Meadow, Sandy Foothills, Sandy Divide COMMON NAME RECOMMENDED % IN SEEDING RATE VARIETIES MIX DRYLAND IRRIGATE D Sand Bluestem Elide, Woodward, Garden 20 to 35 8.0 16.0 Yellow Indiangrass Llano, Holt, Cheyenne, Oto 10 to 30 5.0 10.0 Switchgrass Grenville, Nebraska 28, 10 to 30 2.5 4.5 Blackwell, Pathfinder Prairie sandreed Goshen 10 to 30 3.5 6.5 Sideoats grama Vaughn, Butte, Niner, up to 15 4.5 9.0 El Reno, Haskell Little Bluestem Pastura, Cimmarron up to 10 3.5 7.0 Blue grama Hachital, Lovington up to 10 1.5 3.0 Western wheatgrass Arriba, Barton, Rosana up to 10 8.0 16.0 Needleandthread up to 15 7.5 15.0 Thickspike Critana up to 10 5.5 11.0 wheatgrass Indian ricegrass Paloma up to 10 6.0 12.5 RANGE SITE: Sandy Plains COMMON NAME RECOMMENDED % IN SEEDING RATE VARIETIES MIX DRYLAND IRRIGATE D Sand Bluestem Elide, Woodward, Garden 15 to 30 8.0 16.0 Prairie sandreed Goshen 10 to 25 3.5 6.5 Switchgrass Grenville, Nebraska 28, 10 to 30 2.5 4.5 Blackwell, Pathfinder Sideoats grama Vaughn, Butte, Niner, 5 to 20 4.5 9.0 El Reno, Haskell Yellow Indiangrass Llano, Holt, Cheyenne, Oto 5 to 20 5.0 10.0 Western wheatgrass Arriba, Barton, Rosana up to 20 8.0 16.0 1111111 Ill II 11111111111111111111111111111 Ill 2006-3124 3439172 12/04/2006 02.25P Weld County, CO ORD2006-7 36 of 65 R 0.00 D 0.00 Steve Moreno Clerk& Recorder Blue grama Hachital, Lovington up to 15 1.5 3.0 Little bluestem Pastura, Cimmarron up to 10 3.5 7.0 Needleandthread up to 15 7.5 15.0 Thickspike Critana up to 10 5.5 11.0 wheatgrass Indian ricegrass Paloma up to 10 6.0 12.5 RANGE SITE: Loamy Plains Clayey Plains, Loamy Slopes COMMON NAME RECOMMENDED % IN SEEDING RATE VARIETIES MIX DRYLAND IRRIGATE D Western wheatgrass Aruba, Barton, Rosana 20 to 45 8.0 16.0 Sideoats grama Vaughn, Butte, Niner, 20 to 40 4.5 9.0 El Reno, Haskell Blue grama Hachital, Lovington 10 to 25 1.5 3.0 Green Needlegrass up to 30 5.0 10.0 Needleandthread up to 15 7.5 15.0 Switchgrass Grenville, Nebraska 28, up to 20 2.5 4.5 Blackwell, Pathfinder Big bluestem Kaw up to 10 5.5 11.0 Little bluestem Pastura, Cimmarron up to 10 3.5 7.0 Buffalograss Texoka, Sharps Improved up to 10 Bur: 8.0 Bur: 16.5 Floret: 3.0 Floret: 6.0 Yellow Indiangrass Llano, Holt, Cheyenne, Oto up to 10 5.0 10.0 RANGE SITE: Gravel Breaks, Loess Breaks, Sandstone Breaks COMMON NAME RECOMMENDED % IN SEEDING RATE VARIETIES MIX DRYLAND IRRIGATE D Sideoats grama Vaughn, Butte, Niner, 20 to 45 4.5 9.0 El Reno, Haskell Little bluestem Pastura, Cimmarron 10 to 35 3.5 7.0 Western wheatgrass Arriba, Barton, Rosana 10 to 20 8.0 16.0 Blue grama Hachital, Lovington 5 to 15 1.5 3.0 II IIIIIIIIIIIIIII VIII IIIIIIIIL '911'L"flJt'6" 02:25P Weld County, CO ORD2006-7 37 of 65 R 0.00 D 0.00 Steve Moreno Clerk& Recorder Switchgrass Grenville, Nebraska 28, up to 20 2.5 4.5 Blackwell, Pathfinder Prairie sandreed Goshen up to 20 3.5 6.5 Yellow Indiangrass Llano, Holt, Cheyenne, Oto up to 20 5.0 10.0 Big bluestem Kaw up to 20 5.5 11.0 Needleandthread up to 15 7.5 15.0 Indian ricegrass Paloma up to 10 6.0 12.5 RANGE SITE: Shaly Plains, Alkaline Plains, Salt Flat, Salt Meadow, Saline Overflow COMMON NAME RECOMMENDED % IN SEEDING RATE VARIETIES MIX DRYLAND IRRIGATE D Western wheatgrass Arriba, Barton, Rosana 30 to 45 8.0 16.0 Sideoats grama Vaughn, Butte, Niner, 20 to 40 4.5 9.0 El Reno, Haskell Alkali sacaton Salado 10 to 35 1.0 1.5 Switchgrass Grenville, Nebraska 28, up to 20 2.5 4.5 Blackwell, Pathfinder Blue grama Hachital, Lovington up to 15 1.5 3.0 Yellow Indiangrass Llano, Holt, Cheyenne, Oto up to 10 5.0 10.0 Big bluestem Kaw up to 10 5.5 11.0 RANGE SITE: Overflow COMMON NAME RECOMMENDED % IN SEEDING RATE VARIETIES MIX DRYLAND IRRIGATE D Western wheatgrass Arriba, Barton, Rosana 30 to 45 8.0 16.0 Green Needlegrass Vaughn, Butte, Niner, 10 to 30 5.0 10.0 El Reno, Haskell Switchgrass Grenville, Nebraska 28, 10 to 20 2.5 4.5 Blackwell, Pathfinder Big bluestem Kaw 5 to 20 5.5 11.0 11111111111111111 /III 1111111 /III1111111III IIIII /III /III 2006-3124 3439172 12/04/2006 02:25P Weld County, CO ORD2006-7 38 of 65 R 0.00 0 0.00 Steve Moreno Clerk& Recorder Yellow Indiangrass Llano, Holt, Cheyenne, Oto 5 to 20 5.0 10.0 Blue grama Hachital, Lovington up to 10 1.5 3.0 RANGE SITE: Wet Meadow COMMON NAME RECOMMENDED °/0 IN SEEDING RATE VARIETIES MIX DRYLAND IRRIGATE D Switchgrass Grenville, Nebraska 28, 15 to 30 2.5 4.5 Blackwell, Pathfinder Yellow Indiangrass Llano, Holt, Cheyenne, Oto 15 to 30 5.0 10.0 Big bluestem Kaw 15 to 30 5.5 11.0 Prairie Cordgrass 15 to 30 Little Bluestem Pastura, Cimmarron up to 10 3.5 7.0 Western wheatgrass Arriba, Barton, Rosana 10 to 20 8.0 16.0 Slender wheatgrass San Luis up to 10 5.5 11.0 RANGE SITE: North of Highway 14 COMMON NAME RECOMMENDED % IN SEEDING RATE VARIETIES MIX DRYLAND IRRIGATE D Western wheatgrass Arriba, Barton, Rosana 30 8.0 16.0 Blue grama Hachital, Lovington 30 1.5 3.0 Sideoats grama Vaughn, Butte, Niner, 30 4.5 9.0 El Reno, Haskell Buffalograss Texoka, Sharps Improved 10 Bur: 8.0 Bur: 16.5 Floret: 3.0 Floret: 6.0 20. Add the following as the last two bulleted items of Section 4.5 Mulching: "• At least 70 percent (%) of the mulch by weight shall be ten (10) inches or more in length. • The appropriate use of fabric blankets under trees and shrubs is suggested." 21. Amend Section 5.0 Post-Construction Monitoring to read: 111111 11111 11111III111111111111111111111111111111111 3439172 12/04/2006 02:25P Weld County, CO 2006-3124 39 of 65 R 0.00 I) 0.00 Steve Moreno Clerk& Recorder ORD2006-7 "Monitoring is necessary to check the status of revegetation work and to implement any follow-up measures needed, such as mowing,weed control, watering, overseeding, etc. This is especially important for establishing native species since it may take three to five years for vegetation to become adequately established. Sites should be observed several times during their first two to three growing seasons and at least twice a year thereafter. The guidelines in Section 3.4 should be followed. Design Examples - Weld County does not have specific values to use for the C1, C2, and C3 coefficients within the "Detention Volume by Modified FAA Method" spreadsheet. Please use the Urban Drainage and Flood Control District (Denver area) values." Section 8-11-50. Weld County Addendum to the Text of the Urban Storm Drainage Criteria - Volume 3 A. Chapter 2 - New Development Planning 1. Amend Section 1.2 Four-Step Process, portion titled "Step 3", second paragraph to read: "Constructed Grass, Riprap, or Concrete-Lined Channel. This method of channel stabilization has been in practice for some time; it is described in Volume 2 of the Manual. The water quality benefit associated with these channels is the reduction of severe bed and bank erosion that can occur in the absence of a stabilized channel. On the other hand, the hardlined low flow channels that are often used do not offer much in the way of water quality enhancement orwetland habitat. Weld County does not recommend the use of riprap or concrete lined flood conveyance channels, but does recommend the use of low-flow channels lined with soil-riprap." 2. Add the following to the last paragraph of Section 1.3 Other BMPs: "Weld County will consider and allow use of new, innovative BMP technologies upon review of the proposed BMP(s) on a case by case basis." 3. Amend second paragraph of Section 1.5.4 Guidance for Selecting and locating WQCV Facilities to read: "Laying out WQCV facilities within a development site and watershed requires thought and planning. Often, this decision-making occurs during a master planning process undertaken by Weld County. Outfall system plans and other reports may depict a recommended approach for implementing WQCV on a watershed basis. Such reports may call for a few large regional WQCV facilities,smaller sub-regional facilities,oraltematively an on-site approach. It is always a good idea to find out if a master planning study has been completed that addresses water quality and to attempt to follow the plan's recommendations." 4. Add the following to the last paragraph of Section 1.5.5 Incorporating WQCV into Stormwater Quantity Detention Basins: "Weld County requires that the 100-year detention volume be provided for a given site and allows the WQCV to be incorporated within the 100-year volume." 11111111111111111 IIII 1111111 IIII 1111111 III 111111111 IIII 2006-3124 3439172 12/04/2006 02:25P Weld County, CO ORD2006-7 40 of 65 R 0.00 D 0.00 Steve Moreno Clerk& Recorder B. Chapter 3 - Structural BMP'S 1. Amend third paragraph of Section 6.4 Design Considerations to read: "Perforated outlet and trash rack configurations are illustrated in the TYPICAL STRUCTURAL BMP DETAINS AND SPECIFICATIONS chapter. Figure EDB-3 equates the WQCV that needs to be emptied over 40 hours, to the total required area of perforations per row for the standard configurations shown in that section. The chart is based on the rows being equally spaced vertically at 4-inch centers. This total area of perforations per row is then used to determine the number of uniformly sized holes per row (see detail in the TYPICAL STRUCTURAL BMP DETAINS AND SPECIFICATIONS chapter). One or more perforated columns on a perforated orifice plate integrated into the front of the outlet can be used; however, the fewer the number of columns, the better, maximizing the size of the orifice. Using least number of columns and the largest possible orifice, reduces clogging possibilities. Other types of outlets may also be used,provided they control the release of the WQCV in a manner consistent with the drain time requirements and are accepted in advance by Weld County." 2. Add the following to Section 9.0 Retention Pond (RP) - Sedimentation Facility: "Retention facilities are normally not allowed in Weld County, but will be considered by Weld County for special circumstances. Retention facilities shall be sized to contain a volume equal to twice the 100-year storm runoff volume plus one foot of freeboard. Water within a retention facility shall be mechanically removed and disposed of off-site by the property owner within 48 hours after a storm event." 1111111 11111 11111111 DIE /III 1111111 III VII1 till 3439172 12/04/2006 02:25P Weld County, CO 41 of 65 R 0.00 D 0.00 Steve Moreno Clerk& Recorder 2006-3124 PAGE 41 ORD2006-7 C. Chapter 4 - Typical Structural BMP Details 1. Amend Table 1 as follows: TAW!,1—Typical Norris For£pe.RP and CWF3(Mrtltsi: rtr ainrad I The,dehriis sheen I•sbrein are aalueptual c4:sia'r ib naitva. I''ra>an;ari of final 4-'sign titans 13-s,? cskllc s J>uiFr..: nc1U iI;`.R.CI,ta f....avatfrAl prendandsit,aancr•s:eels r'sinierdn t Morn, rx3<.Hilt.nr>nx'acrk..and vrxntsnan es.aaludaet Fro-i:x:rikea.i'-e-:hrx'r=t! sp;r,:ilioalirms>,are the is an ilrkhr of the ck:dc.ci rsngax:>.c e'i dsYida of the Nebel 2. Al£eninte designs 0,11a;typical ouikf :drtrtnrecc,,U, nhasir::.ry nowsirkiesd fens,eei tram ckiskyn:ur*ist u<khe the hydroblic aryl Maki hai dli ng fi n•moal features :and lobed 4x the sirtishire t iiiissidn in this.L'u siosi, S. ttingwa Us b-awnheraat a'+.rted;;:aadtci haw the wi.uattre b betas: k:dt*'.InaIk,sbwith this slits dives of the toslu . lb s use:of Min deist n.:,aii i s r eannv;nck::. rid dames the ampules is blend ink.'the laridsisaks mast asrAhwasulpi vilws' iesu m$rss fn?- •>rrsidl•ti d i ,..year they need lei In CkW:k1',O".:With ll.il,ran".a kxatx,n of putts sity.its<Jlta tx uxaa�t.ur -. .etg,;ni Eerie lan Th-rxlp.>rkdp,'of these?k ilt should Ish 4lismoiddristed c..ho equal di . Miner than;the 1ec i s,cea;<'a fats six..en in this Fl a oiaT,, 4, Panixuient lamer 5011.1 e,s :fr; b the wa:r 'ad•x ,.d the triseriipmlfar F..A e it?' rthfi 1,1 ti4is and the F.r^ran Yit pool k>r C n llu_tn'.I:d tl ntil'tdna -:l Ratiailicri t'aat-. .. Pedc,ceic•d ecflict plate absent irat':rlbfavvic.kth. >zrrP.a i!*:.:frac to reii1 I viai:t r:*'f:nEink it ifs reniusiMenkiiiii that the latudird eassidisi n .>C'iai'e3 he s lecteGd k 331nr1{ru .y ibis flUEtnb e,s-f q4'j v g. T he intent la 'have an 4nile;U'.ai dimities ilia in Om time•rp^cffi:=17t q hs. 2d.:..r.lr�la or xr:!L :itx, rdhrn..3si. rek,:ii this Ian i;; Plate-a; -1 Mr cgis.den c',]tiis rnr,'di:x5. Vertical lra,;h ruck .'f'la'n is 3a nfeti d: h;udh Hank is dike; li,h he.' s' roil the nanmutat'd dash the W1441 ks-el after the sa.m weenies The ufc ofac::>niitavan,SI•Ve Trash f;.ask sex'At Vi ixit mounridankri ...::Fi;utira:C k r trash hawk design infccrrrrekm. 2. C"ainacjt er flood control rieienti'rs aWV!the difisfiChi ram be.sided ka an;strianiifeoni h. ledsil.rdo ::dererti rfl;WI natsnlaIsth:a2-sir ti is a _ce.its desertheml,:. R. Undo rdrains ui:xw,me deirdeasnt of lire homnineda ar:ad.IncAdam:n shiesIl•it e%::ny r::rr,tnrna n.k'.:l fear Cone-medial Wetland Pas in.aid Filet nfian Ponds a:held: . ..s.r the rod far raatiital hr's 7Srtiifn+BEYan,e. 9. When the MAW Ge,i t7n,infer froth thc,ee shows her kiit ai rtriedlo healed enlicas that;d-4i,(a ttd:nt-' ?,, r the erti:z!i a.rlbt 'l the`: C2CS'. seth the insert of dm lc,-east enlhe k..disd:it 7441 or more sites..the tendon hf liu•micreadiel c-id sa,h<s'e the rxs4:an rsf C sfr:ai.n Rinds zuei Cox i:sbtuaed Walkex!Pelee. i:3 Predirdh fill lerip.Mlic f,:fi'auist.isnsdemo nsll;Blum that IRa iJ.tist will C4?:ids tie triMb inh rc•'.yeas:.f drain Lane of the ranee/C eotu s Vabxne k-c the InfdP rive :e:rrf tits;:d. COW. }. fsax>x i':nfi.,e shallr .pr be:le.d G/aril rupks h eaw,i s EnYtiiaurr tie a•on;m::n waled RI 7. All opniaa eliysansicn>s;'h:dl t..bes:than t .iun:tedifit-d ciuki oreanint::. di Inch racks shall h:hntntlaeb.:r..f kiss sisaa3 is stool or al is nnrtsa eke'-ituci ratty desksa:9 brined l andeer as full hydrisimilio lead tat ih,a uf. insarn skis, cid :'trains' '>1r•kass4er. daplrcartthe:&mien'>cune- •. . Urban Chat ca-*and Typical CweH<t Weston)General!Isms Hod Control Vistti t for 6:cicnded Oeteiitaa3i&&sin, i rainage C,tteria Manual tV.31 Ratanfkat Paul and Co siructed Wettanrl i asin f lets a. "8. Underdrains accessible from the perimeter of the permanent pool,including a shutoff valve, are recommended for Constructed Wetland Basins and a Retention Ponds to help dewater the pool for rehabilitative maintenance." 1 11111 11111 11111 VIII 111111 Ell 1111111 III IIIIII III VIII 3439172 12/04/2006 02:25P Weld County, CO 42 of 65 R 0.00 0 0.00 Steve Moreno Clerk& Recorder 2006-3124 PAGE 42 ORD2006-7 2. Delete, in its entirety, Figure 1 - Typical WQCV Outlet Structure Profile, Including 1OO-year Detention. Nate: Sze 2- through. 10Q-yecr overflew trees ream wet the use of i^. i n 7 Owrtupping Poutaut:'an g 5pf Overflew Outke fed LON& r7noel \ e/ Trueh Reeirs� 1 O?}^YN or Larger Ficad %S ter S:rtaer z 1 �HtfCY Yiatm_Surloco s, -+Flntehed trade Orifice Flut Muucr Parmam-t Water 4) Mews 4] > : y Surface ,..�"" 700-V3? Orifice Trees So&_..rr = r Cantrci Outlet ea`S F.tw•e ' Outik Pipe "' :g()y,antra-(in Ccp+mty ts *4tr r-P Ara v, jr�� ryryr� jyjt r^ ppL pJ. r-1} t{.&'ypyro-vpd (ppha,ew3 DrApJnFt L{o1'i4 �/ ©K4iA::.1. O�,«ttcflg &ethrw and E neegency-.. r Prateulica 3patwv j too-'cif pr Stager Mad Herter Surfiue�_, v I3 ItZL4'grater %lood,_� �.. Cruka Pinto Parfawd nt '*.4mer Da4 10-'N. agile* Sfcfncer er Can it'd Outlet ,,,.. 'rash (MC 5 ,.. :,-,_..r \;see gliWnl a Outlet P#re mm12v7.' ui 10-Ye Cnpooky a'o--Poe e(ootai Poe: ti)ptaxwi) 0vsrtogping St2711wgy Option Urban Oraince. end resift 1 flood Control Distrkf rwrad HrtDir Outlet Structure Profiles Duero:Ant C?ltertg Manua (t'.3) Ineludeg 109—year Octenvcn flit xrsan swan%._. ._...._. Fieurt 1—Typical WQe:V Outlet Strurut'e Pc.R:1t.l,dudu3g 1CO.w r E°ten cn Illll llll lllllll llll lllllll 111 llllll 111 llll e r IIII IIIVII 651 R p'000 D 0.002 Steve Moreno Clerk 2006-3124 PAGE 43 ORD2006-7 3. Amend Figure 2 as follows: Nat:: 5dz4 2- trough 100-par ranlaw iroah waks with IS aid of figure 7, Chadloading Er•wrgg+rntanY Spillway Protaciron ,_ 1D0,-t'R er twgm flood Oatvtticn for Lager rtooda i (h<rflac with Irani fuck—" 1 1, Z- to g0--YR DeienUon L °Arflaw wth train rtatk S \ i 10G-YP, gr Lager £E�rrd.,,,,g1m $vt'!2cs.1tq... ..�_. L- to 14-A W to S rant i � �' aoav 4atnr Surfane _ If••-• -----t `�-Pswhad Gnda e4 truaw pc:maptcni Ytalar 13 '-' Contra tln M ooloo a; !-'Gmtroi MUM +Fv-z-1 :r,Wn . oad::: 11 rirotat .ry;ry; °t2- to ittse undeuos ( Ary,rndr -Control Stalin; Nrara-Prod (Optional) Cron Box Outlet Option 107-YR or :oryar -, 7+.'ertptpk9 flood Spi.sooy \ P:yReciit-1 2- to 10-51Q OctonOon trolled with hash Racf;- ` ttl7-1R oe La„gar flood Water 5utoce / \ �...., a-s se-1 Watt S1 ran t— i k 44).12 water snrra. ,.,_y --�..-,`-., "WI Pvmoromt Water t lot- ' N '6trtaoo; Fr 'aroi R"'&� ^,.�—Con trod O:43.4t tktftew efatw,,,.% (sae flgtae 4) Podiatoln. S ,R ) Ovdrtnnn&ny Sci)3wcty O_ttion Urban Walnada anA fgare a flood Cmlteoi 0isF.^lat 1;0.40 WCV74' 0utiat. Struatore Prof5on 3hcWd o is 1O-to Otd 111M-.Year i)etention Drnb.a',v va-NU4 drrwM (V,3j d"9 �" ern w-aaw.art r4 ft;tur:t 2--Typisa3 WQCt1 Outlot Strueturd Profile,hmiutlin,g 2-to l0•year nord 100-y:<ur E.,+ntrtt7ut. a. Delete the Overtopping Spillway Option from Figure 2. b. Change "Outlet Pipe = 120% of 100-YR Capacity" within the Drop Box Outlet Option to"Outlet Pipe= 100%of 100-YR Capacity"within the Drop Box Outlet Option. \\712tii211O\IIIIIII\O\O\.1O2O\:121IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIt IIIII &Recorder 44 t5 '00 D sieve Moreno Clerk 2006-3124 PAGE 44 ORD2006-7 4. Amend Figure 2-a as follows: f4oh; Fiza .. through 3(3&.sus avarloit trash races with the ad of 8ghre 7 Ik.Crtooltig F 100-)1t o es' Loom Flood Oetaatian ger Flossesoonoy 's-'PraEcxiion then-now Mtn Ire*, Reok—\ ( 2- to 10-YR Detention_ I Otari3aa xlth Trend, Rock 1( \ 100-YR nt Larger Fimst Vetter Samoan Ii \ ,._......_ ........._..�. a.to 1g-'YR LW.a,Syjgct ' �. —& —1 �•-sa.rsne,t Oracle WC 447 vatm Settles .Y HMI'"�' oa t; Parra;maet 'sear 1i'�..---"- Ii 100^YR Orif:ae 1%fie' . ts ,. rCaere,Cb Cutlet ,' 1eC,F a>e d Ostai ?tpe _1=t%xi 1d0-YN O¢aas(ii Write Piult (See Figure 3)- 2- la lo-Tr Orifice Uadtt`d1Ckt ATOVn4.. Central cuaat u&rn-eaai (Upttaia Drop Sox Outlet Op ti'gn 3 DCi--YR at tenor-. Otwtcpain. Find Spllnvvg '. &retention-i 2- to 13R or lops in Fined Water with Moen Rack—, i `1l 3 to I). rR Nieman nOutitwihMoe r 1 2-_18 i,1}.7.1? ftlat.. odosA z... ...... \ `"ti. WOGS/ mater Sur new _- "`-.,, H Pamndaanl Wotan 33' x'"- 1... to IP..11T Critics •111.$JC733S?l.Y .r^'^._.^..... _ r Contrel °utat resh g ,.^?--;:°, F< it Otalat P 72 - 1II TgF rMinatit'f Orlftce Plata (See Nara 4) I_V5,da,ta;a prtnnd Meta-PO i tOpTh r4) Overionoing Stllwoy Option t3rban Dralaa8e and FTgtxe 2-o Flood Central District Alurnote Orelaaga Cdbrta Manual (Y.3) Tjposi WC:CY Outet $tr mare Proflee n* q-we,e aer.s elen4ano 2- to 11)-Year cnd 100-Year petm,tian Figure 2-a—Typical WOCV Outlet Sou-azure Ptfrfile,Inc!+ding 2-to 1 ihyear.navi 1,U-year Cemntioa. a. Delete the Overtopping Spillway Option. b. Change "Outlet Pipe = 120% of 100-YR Capacity" within the Drop Box Outlet Option to "Outlet Pipe = 100% of 100-YR Capacity" within the Drop Box Outlet Option". 111111111111 IIIII III 1111111 III!1111111 III IIIIII III III 3439172 12/04/2006 02:25P Weld County, CO 45 of 65 R 0.00 D 0.00 Steve Moreno Clerk& Recorder 2006-3124 PAGE 45 ORD2006-7 D. Chapter 5 - Maintenance Recommendations 1. Add the following introductory paragraph prior to Section 1 Grass Buffer: "Weld County will require that all submittals include an Operations and Maintenance manual for all water quality and detention pond facilities. The operations and maintenance manuals shall also be distributed to the applicable Homeowners'Association and/or business park association (or equivalent). The operations manuals will include instructions on safe and correct operations, repair, and maintenance of all installed equipment and facilities and recommended inspection schedules." E. Chapter 6 - Industrial and Commercial Best Management Practices 1. Add the following introductory paragraph under Section 1.0 Introduction: "Weld County will require that all submittals include an Operations and Maintenance manual for all industrial and commercial water quality and detention pond facilities. The operations and maintenance manuals shall also be distributed to the applicable business park association (or equivalent). The operations manuals will include instructions on safe and correct procedures forthe operation, repair, and maintenance of all installed equipment and facilities. The manuals shall provide recommended inspection schedules." 2. Amend Section 5.0 Structural Controls, Table IC-1 as follows: Table IC-1—Sugcjpsted Structural Controls control Source's Apiir..utilii1', Cross Barter Parking Areas Appncable to in:.ivanet and n•yl,,en:iai OpY:ati<ins GrW;::5o;ells Parking Areas Otisn let and i grams niai Operations Mirada!Block FaIscnns Parking Areas Aipjcatre to in Yusiriot and P 3nsrneDt CornmQn aai: pc.:atlans. Psysmer Micro-Detention. Parking Areas Applicable to ind:usrriai and Commercoi l.'pera1ICns Landscape!,ifi,-Detention Parking Area*, Applicable Iv infuse sal and Comicennai Ope`utn lIs Extended.Deter.Lon Bos,n Parking Areas Applicable 10 as:.k.r,:u cal en t i 6,YT.mtp:i:al O pixegicak: Conednx".ed Wet:ads ids Parkin Are:3:i Applicable to 1ndustrlal and c:cei,:Tier Clai i]pi+ra Ion s Retenlprn Pond All Sources .A3ePtated w:tn iiidustri31 CI COffiffls'Aaidl OpEintk M 3 N:tti large au;ant iton,of bait.pollutants Constructed Wetlands Parkin;)Areas App;cable li%liadus;r i.lt and Channel '.'YP M eri:ia:Ot>Yrd i i(:OP. Spill Containment alx.f Stcreg?,'Washirig. Aaplfcabillef to all lnduelrial end Control SCC enfainment Mannfamm.Outside Sicrage. Ore,::e , iai Operations Diking,Curbing,In::dalls'.ion Waste BAanageirnenn.Pi:aliirJ of spill acid oa l'flaae Areas,t ontling an Unloading prCii?4ip:11 Covc:rine of Stera,7ei Peeling Areas,Loading nod .Appli,;bitily la ail Industn:a and Handling Facilities (1nloast tort.LkQtii(i fitorape. + oinrae,;'tai ooeralir.:i le M iteriai 3Litage Outside Mai,uiaetulin .Waste Maf:HGerri tit a. Delete"Retention Pond"and replace with"Spill Containment Area." 1111111 11111 1111111 1111 IIII11111111111111 111 1111 2006-3124 3439172 12/04/2006 02:25P Weld County, CO ORD2006-7 46 of 65 R 0.00 0 0.00 Steve Moreno Clerk& Recorder F. Chapter 8 - Construction Best Management Practices 1. Amend the second paragraph of Section 1.1 General to read: "An Erosion and Sediment Control Plan must be developed and submitted to Weld County to obtain a grading permit or a building permit. Site planning and drainage planning should,whenever possible, occur concurrently with site grading and erosion control planning.When site grading precedes final development, an erosion and sediment control plan for site grading must be submitted. This plan may have to be modified at the time a final site development plan is prepared. This modified plan must be submitted for review and approval prior to final development." 2. Amend Section 1.3 Erosion and Sediment Control Plan to read: "An Erosion and Sediment Control Plan consisting of a written narrative report and a site plan map must be submitted to Weld County for review and acceptance. Figures C-1 and C-1A provide standard symbols that can be used on such plans. An example plan is given in APPENDIX B. The written narrative report can be a subsection within the drainage report. The erosion and sediment control plan must include specific inspection and repair/maintenance requirements. 3. Amend paragraph #16 of Section 1.3.1 Narrative Report to read: "16. The following note - "This Erosion and Sediment Control Plan has been placed in the Weld County file for this project. The plan appears to fulfill Weld County criteria for erosion control. I understand that additional erosion control measures may be needed if unforeseen erosion problems occur or if the submitted plan does not function as intended. The requirements of this plan shall run with the land and be the obligation of the land owner until such time as the plan is properly completed, modified or voided." 4. Amend paragraph 3.m of Section 1.3.2 Site Plan to read: "m. The following note: "This Erosion and Sediment Control Plan has been placed in the Weld County file for this project and appears to fulfill applicable erosion control criteria. I understand that additional erosion control measures may be required of the owner and his or her agents due to unforeseen erosion problems or if the submitted plan does not function as intended. The requirements of this plan shall run with the land and be the obligation of the land owner until such time as the plan is properly completed, modified or voided." 5. Replace the current text of Section 1.3.3 Approval of Erosion and Sediment Control Plan with the following: ""An Erosion and Sediment Control Plan must be accepted prior to issuance of a grading permit or a building permit. The final Erosion and Sediment Control Plan must be consistent with the Drainage Report. Approval of the Erosion and Sediment Control Plan does not imply acceptance or approval of Drainage Plans, Utility Plans, Street or Road Plans, or any other aspect of site development." I 1111111111111111IIII1111111IIII111111111111111111 2006-3124 3439172 12/04/2006 02:25P Weld County, CO ORD2006-7 47 of 65 R 0.00 0 0.00 Steve Moreno Clerk& Recorder 6. Amend Section 1.3.4 Exemptions and Variances to read: "A provision for exemptions and variances may be provided byWeld County. These are generally processed according to the applicable subdivision regulations and reviewed on a case-by-case basis." 7. Amend paragraph 1.b of Section 1.3.4 Exemptions and Variances to read: "b. Grading or an excavation below finished grade for basements, footings, retaining walls,or other structures where the disturbed area will be less than one (1) acre in size unless required otherwise." 8. Amend paragraph 1.d of Section 1.3.4 Exemptions and Variances to read: "d. Land-disturbing activities involving less than one (1) acre of disturbed area. Individual lots involving less than one (1) acre of disturbed area in a larger subdivision project shall not be considered separate development projects, but rather as a part of the subdivision development as a whole. It will be the responsibility of the homeowner orhomebuilderto conform to all requirements of the locally-accepted Erosion and Sediment Control Plan for the subdivision. As part of any Building Permit for which a specific erosion control plan is not required, the following statement must be included:"We have reviewed the Erosion and Sediment Control Plan for (subdivision name) and agree to conform to all requirements contained therein and all erosion control requirements of the (insert name of local jurisdiction). We further agree to construct and maintain all erosion and sediment control measures required on the individual lot(s) subject to this Building Permit and/or in accordance with the provisions of the Erosion Control section of the Manual of the Urban Drainage and Flood Control District." 9. Amend paragraph 1.h of Section 1.3.4 Exemptions and Variances to read: "h. Where the owner certifies in writing to Weld County and Weld County agrees, in writing, that the planned work and the final structures or topographical changes will not result in or contribute to soil erosion or sedimentation and will not interfere with any existing drainage course in such a manner as to cause damage to any adjacent property or result in the deposition of debris or sediment on any public way, will not present any hazard to any persons or property, and will have no detrimental influence upon the public welfare or upon the total development of the watershed." 10. Amend paragraph 2 of Section 1.3.4 Exemptions and Variances to read: "2. Variances - The Weld County Engineer may grant variances from the criteria of the Construction Best Management Practices chapter by his/her acceptance of the Final Drainage Report in which the variance request is well documented." 1 Nil 1111111111IIII1111111IIII1111111III Hill III1111 2006-3124 3439172 12/04/2006 02:25P Weld County, CO ORD2006-7 48 of 65 R 0.00 0 0.00 Steve Moreno Clerk& Recorder 11. Amend the fourth bulleted item under Section 2.2 Summary of Criteria to read: • Revegetation. A viable vegetative cover should be established within one year on all disturbed areas and soil stockpiles not otherwise permanently stabilized. Vegetation is not considered established until a ground cover is achieved which, in the opinion of Weld County, is sufficiently mature to control soil erosion and can survive severe weather conditions. (Section 3.3)." 12. Amend the 22nd bulleted item under Section 2.2 Summary of Criteria to read: • Disposition of Temporary Measures. All temporary erosion and sediment control measures shall be removed within 30 days after final stabilization is achieved, or after the temporary measures are no longer needed, whichever occurs earliest, or as authorized by Weld County. (Section 8)." 13. Amend the second paragraph of Section 2.4.2 Stormwater Quality Plans to read: "Stormwater quality plans should be developed consistent with the guidelines in the STORMWATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT and BMP PLANNING FOR NEW DEVELOPMENT AND REDEVELOPMENT chapters of Volume 3 of the Manual." 14. Amend the second paragraph of Section 3.3.2 Temporary Revegetation to read: "To provide temporary vegetative cover on disturbed areas which will not be paved, built upon,or fully landscaped within 12 months but will be completed within 24 months, plant an annual grass appropriate for the time of planting and mulch the planted areas. The annual grasses generally suitable for Weld County are listed in Table C-2. These are to be considered only as a general recommendation whenever specific design guidance for a particular site is not available." 15. Amend the second paragraph of Section 4.1 Vehicle Tracking to read: "For sites greater than two (2) acres, a stabilized vehicle tracking control must be constructed (see Figure C-8). Whenever deemed necessary by Weld County,wash racks shall be installed to remove mud and dirt from the vehicle and its tires before it enters onto public roads (see Figure C-8A)." 16. Amend the first paragraph of Section 4.3.3 Sediment Basins to read: "Areas draining more than 1 acre must be routed through a sediment basin similar to one shown in Figures C-15, C-15A, and C-16. Sediment basins in Weld County shall be designed to a minimum 1,800 cubic feet of volume per tributary acre and shall be cleaned out prior to becoming half full." 11111 11111 1 111111111 IIII 1111111 III 111111 1111111 2006-3124 3439172 12/04/2006 02:25P Weld County, CO ORD2006-7 49 of 65 R 0.00 0 0.00 Steve Moreno Clerk& Recorder 17. Amend the last paragraph of item #2 under Section 5.1 Working Within or Crossing a Waterway to read: "A permit is required for placement of fill in a waterway under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers has issued nationwide general permit Number 14 for Minor Road Crossing Fills. This is defined as placement of less than 200 cubic yards of fill material below the plane of ordinary high water. The local office of the Corps should be contacted about the requirements for obtaining a 404 permit. Weld County should also be consulted and can provide assistance. A further discussion on the need for404 permits is included in Section 2.1, MAJOR DRAINAGE, of the Manual." 18. Amend the first paragraph of Section 5.3 Outlet Protection to read: "To protect adjacent downstream properties from erosion due to concentrated flows, a stable outlet or channel is necessary. If there is no stable outlet, one may have to be constructed. In lieu of constructing a temporary or permanent outlet to the storm drainageway system,temporary total retention of the runoff may be considered on a case-by-case basis upon acceptance from Weld County. Weld County will not approve any detention or retention pond that does not drain in less than 72 hours, or causes injury to water rights, or is in violation of State or Federal law." 19. Amend Section 8.0 Disposition of Temporary Measures to read: "All temporary erosion and sediment control measures shall be removed and disposed within 30 days after final site stabilization is achieved, or after the temporary measures are no longer needed,whichever occurs earliest,or as authorized by Weld County and applicable coordinating agencies (CDOT, CDPHE). For example, a site containing only one building will have temporary erosion control measures removed after building construction is complete and final landscaping is in place. Temporary erosion control measures may be removed from a commercial construction site or residential subdivision only after streets are paved and all areas have achieved final stabilization. Trapped sediment and disturbed soil areas resulting from the disposal of temporary measures must be returned to final plan grades and permanently stabilized to prevent further soil erosion. The Professional Engineer preparing the construction phase erosion and sediment control plan shall obtain the approval of Weld County before removal of any temporary measures." 20. Amend the second paragraph of Section 9.0 Maintenance to read: "The Professional Engineer preparing the permanent erosion and sediment control plan shall submit a schedule of planned inspection and instructions for operations and maintenance for all installed permanent erosion and sediment control measures. The plan shall include identification and specifications (size, materials, etcetera) of parts and equipment potentially needing repair or replacement over the life of the installed measures. A copy of the inspection schedule and instructions for operations and maintenance shall be provided to the applicable Homeowners'Association 1111111 Ell 11111IIII1111111 /11111111 111 111111 IIII 2006-3124 ORD2006-7 3439172 12/04/2006 02:25P Weld County, CO 50 of 65 R 0.00 D 0.00 Steve Moreno Clerk& Recorder or Business Park management (or equivalent). Weld County will not approve any detention or retention pond that does not drain in less than 72 hours, or causes injury to water rights, or is in violation of State or Federal law." 21. Add Section 10.0 Erosion and Sediment Control Warranty to read: "Prior to acceptance and approval of all installed permanent erosion and sediment control measures, Weld County will require that the owner shall warrant the measures shown on the approved erosion and sediment control plan are properly constructed, installed, and are free from defective materials and/or defective workmanship." Section 8-11-60. Enforcement responsibility. It shall be the duty of the Weld County Department of Public Works to interpret and enforce the provisions of the Weld County Storm Drainage Criteria using the following guidelines: A. In the interpretation and application, the provisions of the Weld County Storm Drainage Criteria shall be held as the minimum requirements for promotion of the health, safety, and general welfare of the community. B. The Weld County Storm Drainage Criteria is not intended to interfere with, abrogate, or annul any other regulation, statute, or other provision of law. C. Where any provision of the Weld County Storm Drainage Criteria imposes restrictions different from those imposed by any otherprovisions of the Weld County Storm Drainage Criteria, or any other regulation or provision of law, that provision which is more restrictive or imposes higher standards shall govern. D. The Weld County Storm Drainage Criteria is not intended to abrogate any easement, covenant, or any other private agreement or restriction, provided that where the provisions of the Weld County Storm Drainage Criteria are more restrictive or impose higher standards or requirements than such easement, covenant, or other private agreement or restriction, the provisions of these regulations shall govern. Division 2 Drainage Planning Submittal Requirements Section 8-11-100. Review process. All new developments and subdivisions within the jurisdiction of the Weld County Storm Drainage Criteria shall submit drainage reports, construction drawings, and existing condition and as-built information in accordance with the requirements of this Article. Section 8-11-110. Sketch Plan Drainage Report. The purpose of the Sketch Plan Drainage Report, submitted at the Sketch Plan Review stage of the Planning Review process, is to identify and define conceptual solutions to storm drainage problems which may occur on-site and off-site as a result of the proposed development. 11111111111111111IIII1111111IIII 1111111III 111111 III1111 2006-3124 3439172 12/04/2006 02:25P Weld County, CO ORD2006-7 51 of 65 R 0.00 D 0.00 Steve Moreno Clerk& Recorder In addition, those problems that exist on-site prior to development must be addressed during the conceptual phase. For proposed projects that will have rural levels of development, the Department of Public Works will review the site, surroundings, and proposed improvements and advise the applicant as to what additional information, and/or engineering design may be required for Change of Zone and Final Plat approvals. A. All reports shall be typed on 8.5-inch by 11-inch paper and bound. Drawings measuring 24 inches by 36 inches may be included, as needed. The drawings shall be bound within the report or included within a pocket attached inside the back cover of the report. The report needs to stand-alone, therefore, all important reference material and supporting documents and calculations should be copied and included within the report appendix. The report shall include a cover letter presenting the conceptual design for review and shall be prepared or supervised by an engineer licensed in Colorado. Only original documents sealed in ink will be accepted. The sealed report shall contain a certification sheet as follows: 1. "I hereby certify that this report for the conceptual drainage design of(Name of Development) was prepared by me (or under my direct supervision) in accordance with the provisions of the Weld County storm drainage criteria for the owners thereof." Registered Professional Engineer State of Colorado No. (Affix Seal) B. Sketch Plan Drainage Report Contents. Sketch Plan Drainage Reports shall be prepared in accordance with the following outline and contain the applicable information listed: 1. General Location and Description. a. Location. 1) Township, Range, Section, Quarter Section. 2) Local streets within, and adjacent to, the development. 3) Major open channels, lakes, streams, irrigation and other water resource facilities within and adjacent to the proposed development. 4) Names of surrounding developments including jurisdictions (municipalities). b. Description of Property 1) Area in acres. 11111111111111111 IIll 111111111111111111 III 1111111 II IIII 2006-3124 3439172 12/04/2006 02:25P Weld County, CO ORD2006-7 52 of 65 R 0.00 D 0.00 Steve Moreno Clerk& Recorder 2) Ground cover. 3) Major open channels and ownership. 4) General project description. 5) Irrigation facilities and ownership information. 6) Groundwater characteristics (where applicable). 2. Drainage Basins and Sub-Basins. a. Major Basin Description. 1) Reference to applicable Weld County or adjacent county Master Drainage Plan(s). 2) Major basin drainage characteristics. 3) Identification of all irrigation facilities within 200 feet of the property boundary. 4) Identification of all FEMA-defined 100-year floodplains and floodways affecting the property. b. Sub-Basin Description. 1) Historic drainage patterns on the subject property and adjacent properties. 2) Off-site drainage flow patterns and impacts on the subject property. 3. Drainage Facility Design. a. General Proposed Concept. 1) Proposed concept and typical drainage patterns. 2) Compliance with off-site runoff considerations and constraints. 3) Anticipated and proposed drainage patterns. 4) Identify all requests for variance from Weld County Storm Drainage Criteria. b. Specific Details. 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 2006-3124 3439172 12/04/2006 02:25P Weld County, CO ORD2006-7 53 of 65 R 0.00 D 0.00 Steve Moreno Clerk& Recorder 1) Describe design storms and source of design storm depth information (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Atlas, Urban Drainage and Flood Control District maps, etcetera). 2) Drainage problems encountered and proposed solutions at specific locations. 3) Maintenance access and aspects of the proposed design. C. Sketch Plan Drainage Report Drawing Contents. 1. A General Location (vicinity) Map shall be provided at a scale of 1" = 2000' or larger in sufficient detail to identify upstream off-site drainage areas flowing into the proposed development and general drainage patterns. 2. A Drainage Plan of the proposed development shall be provided at a scale from 1"= 100' or 1" = 200' on a 24"x 36" drawing. The plan shall show the following information: a. Existing contours at 2-foot maximum intervals, contours should extend at least 200 feet from all project boundaries, or further if necessary, to show upstream and downstream drainage relationships impacting the proposed development. b. Property lines, existing and proposed lot lines, and existing and proposed easements. c. Streets with names. d. Existing drainage facilities, pipes, structures, irrigation facilities, and sizes. e. Overall drainage area boundary and sub-area boundaries. f. Proposed flow directions using arrows. g. Conceptual location of storm sewers, swales, open channels, culverts, detention ponds, and other appurtenances. h. Identification of outfall locations and receiving waters. Location of all defined 100-year floodplains affecting the property. j. Any other items so noted within the Drainage Report. 111111 �hhhI 111111111111111111111111111 III IIIIII1 II IIII 3439172 12/04/2006 02:25P Weld County, CO 2006-3124 54 of 65 R 0.00 D 0.00 Steve Moreno Clerk& Recorder ORD2006-7 Section 8-11-120. Change of Zone Drainage Report. The purpose of the Change of Zone Drainage Report is to identify and define preliminary solutions to problems which may occur on-site and off-site as a result of the proposed development. In addition, those problems that exist on-site prior to development must be addressed during the preliminary phase. A. All reports shall be typed on 8.5-inch by 11-inch paper and bound. Drawings measuring 24 inches by 36 inches shall be included,as needed. The drawings shall be bound within the report or included within a pocket attached inside the back cover of the report. The Change of Zone Drainage Report needs to stand-alone, therefore, all important reference material should be copied and included within the report appendix. The report shall include a cover letter presenting the preliminary design for review and shall be prepared or supervised by an engineer licensed in Colorado.Only original documents sealed in ink will be accepted. The sealed report shall contain a certification sheet as follows: 1. "I hereby certify that this report for the preliminary drainage design of(Name of Development) was prepared by me (or under my direct supervision) in accordance with the provisions of the Weld County storm drainage criteria for the owners thereof." Registered Professional Engineer State of Colorado No. (Affix Seal) B. Change of Zone Drainage Report Contents. The Change of Zone Drainage Report shall be in accordance with the following outline and contain the applicable information listed: 1. General Location and Description. a. Location. 1) Township, Range, Section, Quarter Section. 2) Local streets within, and adjacent to, the development. 3) Major open channels, lakes, streams, irrigation and other water resource facilities within,and adjacent to,the proposed development. 4) Names of surrounding developments including jurisdiction (municipalities). b. Description of Property. III 111111111111111111111III' 11111111111111111 IIII 2006-3124 3439172 12/04/2006 02:25P Weld County, CO ORD2006-7 55 of 65 R 0.00 D 0.00 Steve Moreno Clerk& Recorder 1) Area in acres. 2) Ground cover. 3) Major open channels and ownership. 4) General project description. 5) Existing irrigation facilities and utilities and ownership information. 6) Groundwater characteristics (where applicable). 2. Drainage Basins and Sub-Basins. a. Major Basin Description. 1) Reference to Weld County Master Drainage Plan(s) where applicable. 2) Major basin drainage characteristics. 3) Identification of all irrigation facilities and utilities within 200 feet of the property boundary. b. Sub-Basin Description. 1) Historic drainage patterns on the subject property. 2) Off-site drainage flow patterns and impacts on the subject development. 3. Drainage Design Criteria. a. Regulations: Discussion of the optional criteria selected or the deviation from the Weld County Storm Drainage Criteria, if any. b. Development Criteria Reference and Constraints. 1) Discussion of previous drainage studies(i.e., project master plans) for the subject property that influence, or are influenced by, the proposed drainage design and how the studies and plans will affect drainage design for the site. 2) Discussion of site constraints such as slopes, streets, utilities, existing structures, and the proposed development or site plan impacts on the proposed drainage plan. c. Hydrological Criteria. 11111111111111111 IIII 1111111 IIII 1111111 III 1111111111111 2006-3124 3439172 12/04/2006 02:25P Weld County, CO ORD2006-7 56 of 65 R 0.00 D 0.00 Steve Moreno Clerk& Recorder 1) Identify design rainfall (source of design storm depth information National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Atlas, Urban Drainage and Flood Control District maps, etcetera). 2) Identify design storm recurrence intervals. 3) Identify runoff calculation method(s) and any computer models. 4) Identify detention discharge and storage calculation method(s) and computer models. 5) Discussion and justification of other criteria or calculation methods used that are not presented in, or referenced by, the Weld County Storm Drainage Criteria. d. Hydraulic Criteria. 1) Identify capacity references and any computer models. 2) Identify detention outlet type. 3) Identify check/drop structure criteria used. 4) Discussion of other drainage facility design criteria used that are presented in the Weld County Storm Drainage Criteria. 4. Drainage Facility Design. a. General Concept. 1) Discussion of concept and typical drainage patterns for historical conditions. 2) Discussion of compliance with off-site runoff considerations and constraints. 3) Discussion of the content of all tables, charts, figures, or drawings presented in the report. 4) Discussion of anticipated and proposed drainage patterns. b. Specific Details. 1) Discussion of compliance with drainage criteria(street, inlet, and pipe capacities, etcetera). 1 11111111111 11111 IIII111111111111111111III1111111111111 2006-3124 3439172 12/04/2006 02:25P Weld County, CO ORD2006-7 57 of 65 R 0.00 D 0.00 Steve Moreno Clerk& Recorder 2) Discussion of drainage problems encountered and solutions at specific design points. 3) Discussion of detention storage and outlet design. 4) Discussion of maintenance access and aspects of the design. 5) Provide copies of Draft Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment or State Engineer's permit applications (where applicable). 5. Conclusions. a. Compliance with the Weld County Storm Drainage Criteria. b. Drainage Concept. 1) Effectiveness of drainage design to control damage from storm runoff. 2) Influence of proposed development on any applicable Weld County Master Drainage Plan recommendations. 3) Identification and written approval of affected irrigation company or other property owner(s). Weld County may require that the applicant provide evidence that off-site impacted jurisdictions have been notified of the proposed drainage plans and potential impacts. 6. References. a. Reference all criteria and technical information used. 7. Appendices. a. Hydrology Computations. 1) Land use assumptions regarding adjacent properties. 2) Initial and major storm runoff computations at specific design points. 3) Historic and fully developed runoff computations at specific design points. 4) Computer model input and output. b. Hydraulic Computations. I IIIIIII IIII IIIIIII III IIIIIII II IIIIL (I1JtJ'flJJJ,!LLI" 02:25P Weld County, CO 58 of 65 R 0.00 0 0.00 Steve Moreno Clerk& Recorder 1) Culvert sizing. 2) Storm sewer sizing. 3) Street capacity evaluation. 4) Storm inlet sizing. 5) Swale sizing. 6) Open channel sizing. 7) Check dam and/or drop structure sizing. 8) Detention pond area/volume capacity and outlet sizing. 9) Changes to Calculation Methods - If applicant/design engineer modifies any portion of the Urban Drainage and Flood Control District spreadsheets used for hydrologic or hydraulic calculations, the applicant/design engineer shall identify all changes to calculation assumptions or computer programs as to type of change and specific factors that were modified. 10) Computer model input and output. C. Change of Zone Drainage Report Drawing Contents. 1. A General Location (vicinity) Map shall be provided at a scale of 1"=2000' or larger in sufficient detail to identify upstream off-site drainage areas flowing into the development, downstream areas receiving site flows, and general drainage patterns in the project area. 2. A Drainage Plan of the proposed development shall be provided at a scale from 1"= 100' or 1" = 200' on a 24"x 36" drawing. The plan shall show the following information: a. Existing contours at 2-foot maximum intervals, contours should extend at least 200 feet from all project boundaries or further if necessary to show upstream and downstream drainage relationships impacting the development. b. Property lines, lot lines, utility crossings, and easements. c. Streets with names. d. Existing drainage facilities, pipes, structures, irrigation facilities, and sizes. 1 111111 111111111 IIII 1111111III' 1111111I 1111111 11 1111 2006-3124 3439172 12/04/2006 02:25P Weld County, CO ORD2006-7 59 of 65 R 0.00 D 0.00 Steve Moreno Clerk& Recorder e. Overall drainage area boundary and sub-area boundaries. f. Proposed contours and flow directions indicated with arrows. g. Location of proposed storm sewers, swales, open channels, culverts, cross-pans, and other appurtenances. h. Proposed outfall point(s) for runoff from the development area and facilities to convey flows to the final outfall point without damage to downstream properties. Location and elevations of all defined 100-year floodplains and floodways affecting the property. j. Location and types of proposed permanent erosion control features. Section 8-11-130. Final Drainage Plan Report. The purpose of the Final Drainage Report is to update the preliminary design concepts, and to present the design details for the drainage facilities discussed in the Change of Zone Drainage Report. Also, any change to the preliminary concept shall be presented. The Final Drainage Report shall identify all approved requests for variance from Weld County Storm Drainage Criteria. A. All Final Reports shall be typed on 8.5-inch by 11-inch paper and bound. Drawings measuring 24 inches by 36 inches shall be included. The Final Drawings shall be bound within the report or included within a pocket attached inside the back cover of the report. The Final Report needs to stand-alone, therefore, all calculations, computer outputs, plans, supporting documents and important reference material should be copied and included within the report appendix. The report shall include a cover letter presenting the final design for review and shall be prepared or supervised by an engineer licensed in Colorado. Only original documents sealed in ink will be accepted. The sealed report shall contain a certification sheet as follows: 1. "I hereby certify that this report for the final drainage design of (Name of Development) was prepared by me (or under my direct supervision) in accordance with the provisions of the Weld County storm drainage criteria for the owners thereof." Registered Professional Engineer State of Colorado No. (Affix Seal) B. Final Drainage Plan Report Contents. The Final Drainage Report shall be prepared in accordance with the outline shown above under Change of Zone Drainage Report. In addition to including all of the items required for the report and plans submitted with the Change of Zone described above under Change of Zone 11111111111111111 IIII1111111 IIII1111111 III SNUB 2006-3124 3439172 12/04/2006 02:25P Weld County, CO ORD2006-7 60 of 65 R 0.00 D 0.00 Steve Moreno Clerk& Recorder Drainage Report and Drawings, the Final Drainage Report and Drawings should include: 1. Proposed location and sizing of all storm sewers, swales, open channels, culverts, cross-pans, and other appurtenances, including cross-sections of swales and open channels. 2. Routing and accumulation of flows at various critical points for the minor storm runoff. 3. Routing and accumulation of flows at various critical points for the major storm runoff. 4. Detention storage facilities and outlet works, including proposed 100-year water surface elevations. 5. Location of all existing and proposed utilities. 6. Routing of off-site drainage flows through the development. 7. Minimum lowest opening elevations of residential and commercial buildings above the 100-year water surface in streets, open channels, ditches, swales, or other drainage facilities, as illustrated by the preliminary grading plans. 8. Proposed on-site private and public drainage easements. 9. Proposed off-site private and public drainage easements. 10. Elevations of manhole and inlet inverts in relation to project datum. 11. Proposed water surface elevations for street encroachments for the minor and major storm. 12. Critical hydraulic structure dimensions. 13. Orifice plate sizes. 14. Detention pond volumes. 15. All other critical hydraulic elevations. 16. Operations and Maintenance instructions for the proposed stormwater drainage facilities. 17. Construction-Phase Erosion and Sediment control calculations. 18. Permanent Erosion and Sediment control calculations. 111111111111 IIIII VIII 1111111111111111111 1111111 II 1111 2006 3124 3439172 12/04/2006 02.25P Weld County, CO ORD2006-7 61 of 65 R 0.00 D 0.00 Steve Moreno Clerk& Recorder C. The Final Drainage Report design hydraulic calculations shall be provided for each of the proposed elements of the final drainage design. Section 8-11-140. Construction Drawings and Specifications. A. Where drainage improvements are to be constructed in accordance with the accepted Final Drainage Report, the signed and sealed construction plans (on 24" x 36"mylar)and specifications shall be submitted in conformance with the Final Plat for review and acceptance prior to construction. The sealed plans and specifications forthe drainage improvements shall include all drainage components designed within the Final Drainage Report. B. The information required for the drawings and specifications shall be in accordance with sound engineering principles, the Weld County Storm Drainage Criteria, and the Weld County requirements for development and subdivision design. Construction documents shall include geometric, dimensional, structural, foundation, bedding, hydraulic, landscaping, erosion control, and other details as needed to construct the storm drainage facilities. The accepted Final Drainage Plan shall be included as part of the construction documents for all facilities affected by the drainage plan. Submittal of digital format final plans and as-built drawings may also be required by the Weld County Department of Public Works. Weld County requires a minimum of three sets of paper construction plans for use by Weld County inspectors. C. Where erosion control and sediment control improvements are to be constructed in accordance with the accepted Final Drainage Report, the erosion control and sediment control construction plans(on 24"x 36"mylar) and specifications shall be submitted in conformance with the Final Plat for review and acceptance prior to construction. The plans and specifications for the erosion control and sediment control improvements shall include all erosion control and sediment control components designed within the Final Drainage Report. D. Both construction-phase and post-construction (permanent) erosion control and sediment control construction drawings shall be submitted. The construction-phase erosion control and sediment control construction drawings shall be submitted separately from post-construction(permanent)erosion control and sediment control drawings. The construction-phase and post-construction phase erosion control and sediment control construction drawings shall be the basis of compliance evaluations by Weld County inspectors. Section 8-11-150. As-built drawings. A. Recording of Drawings. 1. The project record drawings shall be submitted to, and accepted by, Weld County. Drawings will be submitted in appropriate digital form when requested by the County. 2. Each drawing shall be labeled "DRAWINGS OF RECORD" in neat large printed letters. IIIIIIJ )Ik04! II IIII IIII IIIIIII.25PWldCun62 of6 K0 0.0020 Steve Moreno Clerk& Recorder 3. Construction information shall be recorded concurrently with construction progress by the contractor. 4. Project Record Drawings shall be marked legibly and with an indelible pen. 5. Project Record Drawings shall record actual construction and contain, but are not limited to, the following: a. Field dimensions, elevations, and details. b. Field changes which are made by minor deviations to the design drawings. c. Details, which are not on the original Construction Drawings. d. Elevations of manhole and inlet inverts in relation to project datum. e. Critical hydraulic structure dimensions. f. Orifice plate sizes. g. Detention pond volumes. h. All other critical hydraulic elevations. g. Floodplain and floodway delineations and Base Flood Elevations (BFEs) where applicable. h. Dimensions of erosion control installations. 6. Payment of permit fees must precede final acceptance. B. Submission. 1. The project record drawings shall be submitted to, and accepted by, the Weld County inspectors with a transmittal letter containing the following: a. Date. b. Project Title. c. Design Engineer's name, address, and telephone number. d. Title and number of each Record Document. e. The signature of the Design Engineer and their Professional Engineering stamp. 1111111 11111 11111 III1111111111111111111lII IIII VIII IIII 3439172 12/04/2006 02:25P Weld County, CO 2006-3124 63 of 65 R 0.00 0 0.00 Steve Moreno Clerk& Recorder ORD2006-7 2. The initial acceptance of the storm drainage improvements will not be made until all Weld County installation requirements are satisfied and the Project Record Drawings are received and accepted by Weld County. 3. Acceptance of storm drainage improvements will not be made until all on- site drainage easements have been recorded. Acceptance of storm drainage improvements will not be made until all off-site drainage easement agreements have been signed and notarized. 4. The final drawings of the storm drainage improvements will not be made until the Project Record Drawings are received and accepted by Weld County. 5. Weld County requires that the Project Record Drawings first be submitted in blueline form for preliminary acceptance before final mylars are submitted. Submittal of digital format final plans and digital format as-built drawings may also be required by the Weld County Department of Public Works. BE IT FURTHER ORDAINED by the Board that the Clerk to the Board be, and hereby is, directed to arrange for Colorado Code Publishing to supplement the Weld County Code with the amendments contained herein, to coincide with chapters, articles, divisions, sections, and sub sections as they currently exist within said Code; and to resolve any inconsistencies regarding capitalization,grammar, and numbering or placement of chapters,articles,divisions, sections, and sub-sections in said Code. BE IT FURTHER ORDAINED by the Board if any section,subsection, paragraph,sentence, clause, or phrase of this Ordinance is for any reason held or decided to be unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions hereof. The Board of County Commissioners hereby declares that it would have enacted this Ordinance in each and every section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause, and phrase thereof irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, paragraphs, sentences, clauses, or phrases might be declared to be unconstitutional or invalid. 1111111111111111111111111111 1II !1!J 11u "11 unty, rk 64 of 65 R 0.00 D 0.00 Steve Moreno Clerk& Recorder 2006-3124 PAGE 64 ORD2006-7 The above and foregoing Ordinance Number 2006-7 was, on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the 13th day of November, A.D., 2006. BOARD OF OUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD CO TY, COLORADO VELA ATTEST: g ' -eat/ eile, Chair Weld County Clerk to the $oaks` • IcAls Vr- eek David E. Long, Pro-Tem BY: Dept Clerk the oard W'lliam H. Jerke `b ' � APPROVED AS TO FORM: j �� Robert ©. Masdey Assn Cnney � «� A4-:!,<4.41 l� .c Glenn Vaad First Reading: September 11, 2006 Publication: September 20, 2006, in the Fort Lupton Press Second Reading: October 2, 2006 Continued to: October 9, 2006 Continued to: October 23, 2006 Publication: November 1, 2006, in the Fort Lupton Press Final Reading: November 13, 2006 Publication: November 22, 2006, in the Fort Lupton Press Effective: November 27, 2006 1 111111 11111 dill 1111111 Ell 1111111 III VIII IIII IIII 3439172 12/04/2006 02:25P Weld County, CO 65 of 65 R 0.00 D 0.00 Steve Moreno Clerk& Recorder 2006-3124 PAGE 65 ORD2006-7 Hello