The URL can be used to link to this page

Browse Search

Home My WebLink About20063235.tiff NOV-08-2006 WED 10:24 AM K P KAUFFMAN FAX NO. 303 825 4825 P. 01/01 K.P. KAUFFMAN COMPANY, INC. WORLD TRADE CENTER 1818 eROADWAT, 28TH FLDDR PFHvER, CDt.ORADO 50202-4629 Tt6EPHOHD 1303)626-4822 • FAC91MILC(3031 026-4826 -- — WWW.kpk.com - . - - November 8, 2006 VIA FACSIMILE-(970-352-0242) Ms. Esther Gesick Weld County Clerk to the Board 915 10th Street Greeley, CO 80631 RE: 3'd AmUSR-894 Dear Ms. Gesick, We are in agreement with scheduling our Board of County Commissioners hearing for 3'd AmUSR-894 on December 20,2006. We understand this does fall outside the 45-day scheduling deadline. Sincerely, Gordon L. Allott, Jr. Executive Vice President and General Counsel cc: Todd Hodges Design, LLC (Fax—970-613-8556) EXHIBIT 2006-3235 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS' SIGN POSTING CERTIFICATE THE LAST DAY TO POST THE SIGN IS December 10, 2006. THE SIGN SHALL BE POSTED ADJACENT TO AND VISIBLE FROM A PUBLICALLY MAINTAINED ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY. IN THE EVENT THE PROPERTY BEING CONSIDERED FOR A SPECIAL REVIEW IS NOT ADJACENT TO A PUBLICALLY MAINTAINED ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY, THE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES SHALL POST ONE SIGN IN THE MOST PROMINENT PLACE ON THE PROPERTY AND POST A SECOND SIGN AT THE POINT AT WHICH THE DRIVEWAY (ACCESS DRIVE) INTERSECTS A PUBLICALLY MAINTAINED ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY. I, ROGER CARUSO, HEREBY CERTIFY UNDER PENALTIES OF PERJURY THAT THE SIGN WAS POSTED ON THE PROPERTY AT LEAST TEN/FIFTEEN DAYS BEFORE THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS HEARING FOR 3rd AMENDED USE-894 IN THE AGRICULTURAL ZONE DISTRICT. ROGER CARUSO Name of Person Posting Sign — Roger Caruso Signature of Person Posting Sign STATE OF COLORADO ) ss. COUNTY OF WELD The foregoing instrument was subscribed and sworn to me this 6th day of December, 2006. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Notary Public co/o1 . . •° '` rte At3 u\C).°::5 My Commission Expires: I O EXHIBIT • p SQ°4;' • (0 • O I N ' k ' O . CL N • 1 • till . y i t. , �2 ' . MI:, ,l, k 1111 ,,h, 4 it iii, . ..: -$ - eav �� \ ' . '. ' '' .:1.1 : 160.11 ..?0,. . Liu ii..., :' Ali,: .40+400--1,"*.', ' - . . r DEC-19-2006 TUE 08 26 AM ANADARKO FAX NO. 303 296 9523 P. 02/02 klj KerrNtGee December 15, 2006 K.,,- G„o I s Gas GnThoro LP 1990 aroadway,Sutto 3700,Doom,Colorado 80202 303-2063800-Fax 303-286-3001 VIA FACSIMILIE AND U.S-MAIL Weld County Hoard of County Commissioners 918 10th Street Greeley, Colorado 80631 Re: Site Specific Development Plan and Special Review Permit#984 Kauffman Land&Development LLC do Todd Hodges Design, LLC -Applicant Township 2 North,Range 67 Weft. 6th P.M, Section 9: SE/4 Weld County,Colorado Dear Commissioners: The purpose of this letter is to inform you that Kerr-McGee Oil & Gas Onshore LP after further review of the Kauffman Land & Development LLC's application for a Site Specific Development Plan and Special Review Permit; Ken-McGee fully acknowledges and supports the development. Please contact me at 720-264-2648 if you have any questions of comments about this matter. Thank you for cooperation and consideration. Sincerely, 'Keerr(r-/McGee Oil & Gas Onshore LP etry D.Emig t1�'�-� Landman Specialist cc: Kauffman Land&Development LLC c/o Todd Hodges Design, LLC-Applicant Joseph H. Lorenzo—Kerr-McGee Oil& Gas Onshore LP EXHIBIT G K.P. KAUFFMAN COMPANY, INC. WORLD TRADE CENTER 1675 BROADWAY, 28TH FLOOR DENVER, COLORADO 80202-4628 TELEPHONE (303)825-4822 FACSIMILE (303) 825-4825 www.kpk.com January 9, 2007 Ms. Esther Gesick Weld County Clerk to the Board 915 10`h Street Greeley, CO 80631 Re: 3`d AMUSR-894 Kauffman Land and Development, LLC Dear Ms. Gesick: Pursuant to Anne Johnson's request, enclosed is a disk copy of the presentation given at the December 20, 2006 hearing for Kauffman Land & Development, LLC. Please let me or Anne know if you need anything further. Sincerely, Debbie Rogers Executive/Legal Assistant Enclosure cc: Anne Johnson (via fax) EXHIBIT fl (26A/ Ltd 4trn US/2 "�'9 ■ "flit 1 % 1 I1 K.P. KAUFFMAN COMPANY, INC. ■ — FIRESTONE T r- i - ( Vicinity I Map . I IGABounda I eweld •---- .. • ICo:ntyJr i4 r n ' i.!R EST ONE site ? �t I l . ■ Helicopter Pad • _ _�.� . _ n 7-_ L �` + may• • wt _ . I t r. fir to° .. - ■ Helicopter Pad and Fence __. _ � y_sewtatr _ . .`o► 'VP •yam " - - i "� '* cam+ i ,1 . ,`� ■ Helicopter Pad and Parking Area --- • • Wig • • • ■ Parking Area and Fence _ _ - — _ _ _ - WI > Y� i - �♦ r+:_+3 �.i '-! _ �` - i .O' _ ��-oe-F"'_. vn -^e -rte o' v =i. ... ''- ' L` - ' �Ame-• _„7�t_�``l _ - ' -i -.f+ter - - � -' ■ 1r U ot `ems , .aci = , I Parking a II i N.. Site Map ra• • I: \� \� . 6 7 \ ` ' , it a Se r '1 Vi II _ r , o /Ind ` ,, =�� Li Yc. I s 1 1 i 9� '` . d --N RIP MR • J r r' rx L - - MANY WELD COUNTY ROAD 22 i it f ase) I ' I ✓ omm�[ '' t PLOT PLAN I I - �• b0' rllr ♦••••rsn° ■ Viewed from Southeast looking Northwest lova .- � l" • tit deter- r ". ■ Viewed from Southwest looking Northeast _ et,{sy, ig `Y :• 1 tfL • • ■ Field Office Neighborhood L -M -'`� 4 _ ► • t . , �_ _ - - i.x ).-- I Y ---Y- / A ■ me 216 Square Miles r __Li__ . r_ .• .. . _ � _ Dacone J - - ,_ - - Firestone [ - -- - Fredoriiiy_ Ft. Lupton I_ ! . _, � • T , • , . j _ _,..„,,, , ,, _ _.,_ it...L._ _ _ , . .,.,:., .I I , , . ...., , ,_ , ■ Well Locations 1. �— 1 _ _ �., —.. • 1 - — / f } 1 1.1 l - — 1 . • +-... re s 1 r• • • • • . • -^-. ' ...r e's'y rev ... • • i• .rT • YT• • • . . c. I1 . . . .Y _ __ -. ... vIIyI • I . . . I• Y' _ I • T'W �• f..r f• I . I . •. ... •=rq.'. • 1 r ■ Pipeline System INNS Fie.. Offic- ♦ T ` - . r. I i` _1— ;,. I. ■ K. P. Kauffman Co. Assets ■ Produces mainly from Sussex/Shannon Formations ❑ Oil bearing formation r Low pressure formation ■ C/N "J " Sand Wells Higher pressure formation ■ me Codell and S/S Wells 1 'la 1A sink a �.. Y,a ■ me K. P. Kauffman Co. Assets Rod Pumped Oil Wells Operations ■ Each well averages two workovers a year ■ Internalized Oil Field Services ■ Significant Management Supervision ■ On-site Supervision • Kauffman Well Service e . o Workover Rig 1111611111.15- ■ i" K. P. Kauffman Co . ( Denver, CO) r Kauffman Well Service ( Platteville , CO) ■ Supervisory Issues : 216 Square Mile Area ■ 107 Employees ❑ Assignments at 6:00 a.m. ❑ 22 of these employees support the drilling rig and never go to Field Office ■ Go To Assigned Jobs ❑ Within 216 Square Mile Area ■ 8 Workover Rigs ❑ 1 is dedicated to the area east of Denver to Sterling ■ 5 Roustabout Crews • Multiple Jobs Daily ■ 15 Pumpers ■ 1 Drilling Rig Crew ■ i" K. P. Kauffman Co . ( Denver, CO) 1 Kauffman Well Aviation Service Technology Services ( Platteville , CO) (Centennial , CO) ■ Supervisory Solution : 216 Square Mile Area eel ' JAM -- '- / ■ ■ I I 1. I L i - -41-1 7 ! , : i u_mi-1:1+101-'. _ f _ _ � J ice+ 1. r ...-•. r F-- -�'• . �� t . i t .. ._l. i.. - fa` - i l � {t — 1 I_ --_ 1 . 1 -1-b Ma . _ ■ Pipeline Inspection Issues ■ Location I Placed Under Ground I Majority of Pipelines Not Visible from Roads; Less than 25% visible May be Under Crops or Within Inaccessible Areas ■ Inspection I Age of Lines Dictates Periodic Inspection ■ Majority of pipelines are at least 25 years old ■ Laser Technology 'fl' IV853 ■ Environmental Leak Detection of Pipelines • Aerial Inspection Using : • Laser Technology n Methane Detection ( 1 ppm) Protect Agriculture and Population Density of Weld County El More Cost Efficient Most Effective Detection Process at 1 ppm ■ Leak Detection Results - - &CI o 0 Q C o U O Symbol Legend Cji_ Symbol Size Proportional to Concentration Red Symbol - 7.0• mto 9.5 ppm CH4 Yellow Symbol - 5.0 to < 7.0 ppm CH4 Green Symbol - „ > 0 to < 5.0 ppm CH4 Black Symbol - • 0 ppm CH4 Aviation Technology Services, LLC February 3, 2005 Pipeline Inspection ■ Why Helicopters? ■ Simple - ■ Supervisory Efficiency ■ Environmental Safety id C L v� C'a,, L. t;,c(c L- ALL. , eimaimommlik I`1 M it CO L N X W 4 a=wo.+ ele MWE. 101141KINil.um III Won fiUIH00Nl&✓ aah - P. C e � � d / kf � 2O m § : § \ § $f � CD E / a ,_ Eoa :R-4- p / § % & � a ° @ @ //3 / 22 .g» �/ § k k 0 2 � /� / C0% O = 0 •- E �� ° Eo = 2m 2 � 0Q 7E of >,@2 o m t 2@ E % c:-.... Q ¢ c-..... 3 q : \ cp :1=4 /k c O- Ns 2 2 2 2 // % 3 Cli % J & ® 2 0 02 co co N ci E2 o / • =Q\ R c ? 2 E \ m3E �o R2a � ° O2 • m � o .0 / c/�as / } � o / ° / / 5 . O e.,• � � oC .- \ 22 § � � � .c"? _o -O _o 32 - 7 •- o Ne 2 2 -0 -0 c e — % \ E .�- � ' 0o2 2N• R co § � e / '{ w � 2E ' k � a EEO 3 — o § oClCi O_ � 2 � /�� k � k � � k X ° ' 0G � CO C ® 0 % ® � � e . o c2 c e / $ 3 / / , 7 � cmc t = — 4y / � 8 • 2moo c DE 5o E • Eo N in % U) � k / � k n2C � � 2 % \ / ° e 000 � 2 = off -0- u) na0 » e0 N ft U aS 2t2 a = % � c & 2 ] Q $ % con ® �cm � � 520 § •- li w % f � \ / s \ § / R ■ � Gloraloma Ranch Opposes 3rd Amended Approval of AMUSR#894 Use b S •eclat RevleW #894 •Gloraloma is a horse boarding&training facility in close Y p proximity to landing site. Kauffman Land Development, LLC •Gloraloma has a pending application for PUD residential development adjacent to landing site. •Overflights are incompatible with current and proposed surrounding properly uses. Weld County Board of •Landing site and flights impact current and planned Commissioners developments and annexations to Town of Firestone. •Current use of property impacts neighbors already with December 20, 2006 visual and traffic concerns. •Flights began and continue with no permit in place. •Precedence for denial due to incompatibility. Location Gloraloma Facility v iii i 1 c 3 i pl'�.CT ` • If I• r • i Gloraloma Facility Gloraloma Facility Y t lie EXHIBIT J- 1 3+dAmuse 419y Gloraloma Facility Gloraloma Facility %' ' Kauffman Facility • I.:if- ° ks Kauffman Facility Kauffman Facilit • • 'Cr -aro.. sine t 2 Kauffman Facilit Flights Without WC Approval - r--or rTrarauTts7 + - Flights Without WC Approval Flights without WC A. royal Landing Pad amt.a Proximity to Livestock niProximit & Dust Abatement r .', ,:a wr 1 - .ate ••,, '+ 3 Proximity to Urban Density Land -- _ "t4wnof Firestone -� SITE { •• Gloraloma Ranch •I Gloraloma Estates Precedent for Denial Summary and Request for Denial • Case#USR-1559, October 4, 2006 • Current use is high impact(traffic,noise,visual). • Flights conducted without permit. • Proposal for private airstrip south of Roggen. • Lack of dust abatement. • Rural, low density area. • Located in an area of urban density. • Fewer planned flights. • Overflights affect livestock. • Flights• Denied by BOC unanimously based on necRre a convenience for the applicant, not a necessity. incompatibility with neighborhood. • Impact to adjacent PUD. • Incompatible with current and planned uses in surrounding neighborhood. 4 Hello