The URL can be used to link to this page

Browse Search

Home My WebLink About20071583.tiff � � a DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES � � � SOUTHWEST OFFICE 4209 CR 24.5 LONGMONT, CO 80504 PHONE: (720)652-4210, Ext. 8730 C. FAX (720) 652-4211 COLORADO February 14, 2006 Jim Birdsall c/o Kum & Go Convenience Store#913 23111 County Line Road Berthoud, CO 80573 Subject: SPR-394-Site Plan Review for a Kum & Go Convenience Store and Gas Station located on a parcel of land described as Lot 1, Lyons 66 Pacific Commerce Park; being part Pt NW4 of Section 26, T3N, R68W of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado. Dear Applicant: Your application and related materials for the request described above are complete and in order at this time. Our Department will be processing the Site Plan within 45 to 60 days upon receipt of the application. You will be notified by this office at the end of the review period regarding the site plan. It is the policy of Weld County to refer an application of this nature to any town or municipality lying within three miles of the property in question or if the property under consideration is located within the comprehensive planning area of a town or municipality. Therefore, our office has forwarded a copy of the submitted materials to the Firestone and Mead Planning Commission for their review and comments. Please call Firestone at 303-833-3291 and Mead at 970-535-4477, for information regarding the date, time and place of the meeting and the review process. If you have any questions concerning this matter, please feel free to call or visit our office. Sincerely, 1 � �L �� ' Kim O� Planner /�L /y0� 2007-1583 FIELD CHECK inspection date: April 2006 CASE NUMBER: SPR-394 APPLICANT: Neil Broderick, Kum & Go LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 1, Block 1, Lyons 66 Pacific Commerce Park, being part of the NW4 Section 26, Township 3 North, Range 68 West of the 6th PM, Weld County, CO LOCATION: South of and adjacent to SH 66; east of and adjacent to I-25 Frontage Road n� N A (Agricultural) N SH 66, Sekich Business Park E A (Agricultural) E John Deere Dealership S A (Agricultural) S Lyons 66 Pacific Commerce Park and Development Parcels W A (Agricultural) W Lyons 66 Pacific Commerce Park and Development Parcels and I-25 COMMENTS: • Property sits low compared to surrounding grades land is presently vacant, with established native grasses and a few woody shrubs Areas of property appear to have "wet feeY' as indicated by reeds and rushes concrete irrigation laterals bisect land Change in elevation between SH 66 and property is approximately 35-40 feet Proposed road alignment would bisect property and require extensive regrading There are two advertisement signs on the property (Billboard) � � Kim Og , lanner a �� SITE PLAN REVIEW W��. Administrutive Review COLORADO Case Number. Site Plan Review 394 (SPR-394) Parcel Number. 1207-26-000034 Applicant: Neil Broderick Kum & Go, 6400 Westown Parkway, Des Moines, IA 50266 Legal Description: Lot 1 Block 1, Lyons 66 Pacific Commerce Park; Part of the NW 1/4 of Section 26, Township 3 North, Range 68 West of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado Zoning: PUD: C-3 (Business Commercial) & I-1 (Industrial) Uses Proposed Use: Convenience Store and Gasoline Service Station furnishing services and merchandise at retail to the general public. Comments Meets the Intent of the Weld Count Code Site Plan Certification Included in A lication YES Retention Facilities Not Approved, See Attached Department of NO Engineering Dept. Public Works referral response dated March 13, A roval Date 2006 Off-street Parkin 17 s aces re uired, 17 s aces delineated YES Loadin Areas Loadin Area s Not Delineated NO Access Temporary Access Easement between Lot 1 and YES Lot 2 of the PUD. Setback Re uirements 20 Feet YES Offset Re uirements 10 Feet— Parkin west ro ert line YES Landsca in See comments YES Trash Collection and YES Stora e Potable Water Little Thom son Water District YES Sewa e Dis osal Saint Vrain Sanitation District YES Environment Standards YES Pro ert Maintenance YES Commentary: This Site Plan Review is for a convenience store with gas facilities to be constructed on Lot 1 of Lyons 66 Pacific Commerce Park which is located in the southeast quadrant of Interstate 25 SPR-394 KUM&GO , STORE#913, page 1 and State Highway 66. At the time of this review, the Final Plat for Lyons 66 has not been recorded and the time frame for construction on State Highway 66 and the Interstate 25 Frontage Road (aka Mead street to the North) is unknown; however, the final design for all infrastructure improvements are complete. The Improvements Agreement, the Covenants and the Final Plat for the Lyons 66 Pacific Commerce Park (PF-555) shall be recorded prior to staff accepting this Site Plan Review, SPR- 394 plat for recording, including scheduling the Improvements Agreement collateral for acceptance by the Board of County Commissioners. This Site Plan Review is npproved with the attached conditions: The Site Plan Review Plat shall be prepared per Section 23-2-160.V of the Weld County Code. The applicant sha�l submit a paper copy of the plat for preliminary approval to the Weld County Department of Planning Services. Upon approval of the paper copy the appiicant shall submit a Mylar plat along with all other documentation required as Conditions of Approval. The Mylar plat shall be recorded in the office of the Weld County Clerk and Recorder by Department of Planning Services' Staff within 30 days of approval and with payment of eleven ($11.00) dollars for the first sheet and ten ($10.00) per each additional sheet. (Department of Planning Services) 1. Prior to recording the Site Plan Review plat, the applicant shall address the following: A. The applicant shall address the concerns of the Department of Public Works specific to the drainage for this site. The site was master-planned with the Lyons 66 development and that retention will be provided by the subdivision's pond. At this time, the subdivision's detention pond has not been constructed. The applicant shall address the existing lack of detention. Evidence of approval shall be submitted to the Department of Planning Services. (Department of Public Works) B. The applicant shall address the concerns of the Department of Pubiic Works specific to the access, including the temporary access easement, and the concerns raised by the Department of Public Works and Felsburg, Holt and Ullevig's review of the Kimley-Horn traffic Impact study dated July 2005 for this site. Evidence of approval shall be submitted to the Department of Planning Services. (Department of Public Works) C. The applicant shail attempt to address the concerns/requirements of the Mountain View Fire Protection District as stated in their referral dated March 7, 2006. Written evidence of approval shall be submitted to the Department of Planning Services. (Department of Planning Services) D. The applicant shall complete all proposed improvements including those regarding landscaping, screening, access improvements and parking lot requirements to the satisfaction of the Department of Planning Services and the Department of Public Works or enter into an Improvements Agreement according to policy regarding collateral for improvements and post adequate collateral for all required materials. The agreement and form of collateral shall be reviewed by County Staff and accepted by the Board of County Commissioners prior to recording the Site Plan Review plat. (Department of Planning Services) SPR394 KUM&GO , STORE#913, page 2 E. The applicant shall submit a waste handling plan, for approval, to the Environmental Health Services Division of the Weld County Department of Public Health & Environment. Written evidence of approval from the Department of Public Health and Environment shall be submitted to the Department of Planning Services. The plan shall include at a minimum, the following: 1. A list of wastes which are expected to be generated on site (this should include expected volumes and types of waste generated). 2. A list of the type and volume of chemicals expected to be stored on site. 2. The waste handler and facility where the waste will be disposed (including the facility name, address, and phone number). (Department of Public Health and Environment) F. The applicant shall submit evidence of an Air Poliution Emission Notice (A.P.E.N.) and Emissions Permit appiication from the Air Pollution Control Division (APCD), Colorado Department of Health and Environment. Alternately, the applicant can provide evidence from the APCD that they are not subject to these requirements. Written evidence of approval from the Department of Public Health and Environment shall be submitted to the Department of Planning Services. (Department of Public Health and Environment) G. The applicant shall submit evidence of an Underground Storage Tank permit from the Colorado Department of Labor and Employment (CDL&E), Oil Inspection Section for any storage tanks located on the site. Alternately, the applicant can provide evidence from the (CDL&E), Oil Inspection Section that they are not subject to these requirements. Written evidence of approval from the Department of Public Health and Environment shall be submitted to the Department of Planning Services)(Department of Public Health and Environment) H. The applicant is proposing one monument sign for this facility dimensioned as two feet eight inches by eleven (11) feet for a total of twenty-nine (29) SF. This dimension is not in compliance with the County Code, Section 26-2-90.D.3.f which states "Monument signs shall have an enclosed, solid base or structural base with the base at least three-fourths ('/.) the width of the widest part of the sign face. An enclosed or solid sign base shall not be required if the lower edge of the sign face is not higher than one (1) foot above the finished grade. Monument signs shall be on-premises signs, the sign area shall not exceed twenty-five (25) square feet, and the sign shall not exceed five (5) feet in height above the average adjacent grade, if located fifteen (15) feet from the street right-of-way. For each additional two (2) feet of setback from the street right-of- way, one (1) additional foot may be added to the height of the sign to a maximum of eight (8) feet." The applicant shall address this issue and modify the signs required. Written and graphic evidence shall be submitted to the Department of Planning Services. (Department of Planning Services) I. The applicant shall attempt to address the concerns of the Town of Mead specific to an annexation petition. Written evidence shall be submitted to the Department of Planning Services. (Town of Mead) SPR394 KUM&GO , STORE#913, page 3 J. The applicant shall address the concerns of the Department of Building Inspection. Written evidence shall be submitted to the Department of Planning Services. (Department of Building Inspection and Planning Services) K. The Improvements Agreement, the Covenants and the Final Plat for the Lyons 66 Pacific Commerce Park (PF-555) shall be recorded prior to staff accepting this Site Plan Review, SPR-394 plat for recording, including scheduling the Improvements Agreement collateral for acceptance by the Board of County Commissioners. (Department of Planning Services) 2. The plat shall be amended to delineate the following: A. The requirements of the American Disability Act (ADA). ADA parking spaces are twenty (20) feet by eight (8) feet with five (5) foot aisles. A minimum of one space must be van accessible with an eight (8) foot aisle. An accessible path shall be required from the building to the public right-of-way (Pacific Circle or East Interstate 25 Frontage Road). Grading shall not be greater than 2% for the handicap stalls and access aisles. The dimensions of the handicapped parking spaces shall be indicated on the plat. (Departments of Pianning Services) B. The off-street loading area for the facility. (Department of Planning Services) C. The right-of-way for Pacific Circie and East Interstate 25 Frontage Road shall be dimensioned on the plat. (Department of Planning Services) D. Telephone, Natural Gas and Electric Service shall be delineated in accordance with Section 27-9-40 of the Weld County Code. (Department of Planning Services) E. Section 23-2-160.R.6 of the Weld County Code requires a minimum forty (40) foot flare radii in commercial developments. The radii delineated on the site plan are twenty-five (25) feet. Large vehicles will not be able to enter the site without crossing into the opposite lane. There is no obvious solution, however the applicant shall address and resolve this issue. (Department of Public Works) F. Sheet G1 contains SWPPP notes; therefore, note 3 on Sheet 1 that refers to the Town of Wellington Erosion Control standards shall be eliminated. (Department of Public Works) G. The applicant shall inciude on the Landscape Plan in accordance with Section 26-2-70 and all applicable sections of the Weld County Code, the following information: 1. Section 26.2.70.B.6 states "fescue, brome/fescue or other turf types shall be used in lieu of bluegrass where heavy foot traffic is not anticipated..." 2. Section 26.2.70.C.2 states that berming and shrub or tree planting shall be used to screen parking lots from view of the roadway (Pacific Circle, East Interstate 25 Frontage Road and State Highway 66). Berms can vary in height depending on location and proximity of existing trees. Berms shall have smooth transitions from the top of the curb to the setback line so as to not create snow traps, with allowances made for SPR394 KUM&GO , STORE#913, page 4 placement of the sidewalk. Grading of berms shall not be lumpy or abrupt. Berm cross-sections shatl be indicated on the Landscape Plan. See Appendix 26-H of the Weld County Code. (Department of Planning Services) 3. Section 26.2.70.C.4 states "at least ten percent (10%) of the area of a parking lot must be landscaped if the lot contains ten (10) or more spaces. The requirement may be counted toward the maximum lot coverage requirement of each zone district. At least seventy-five (75%) of the required landscape area shall include living plant material." (Department of Planning Services) 4. Section 26.2.70.D.2.b states "that portion of a lot in any zone district which abuts a public or private road right-of-way shall be landscaped with a minimum two-and-one-half-inch caliper shade tree or six-foot minimum height coniferous tree at a distance of then (10) feet..." (Department of Planning Services) 5. Section 26.2.70.D.2.d states "a minimum landscape setback along State Highway 119 and their subsequent frontage roads shall be fifty (50) feet measured from the existing or planned future right-of-way." (Department of Planning Services) 6. The installation schedule shali specify when the landscaping will be installed on site. (Department of Pianning Services) 7. A landscape maintenance schedule which specifically states who will perform maintenance and that maintenance is on-going and shall not end upon final acceptance by the Department of Planning Services. (Department of Planning Services) 8. The method of native grass planting shall be called out as drilled or broadcast and applied at a rate of how many pounds per acre, and/or pounds per square foot. (Department of Planning Services) 9. A Noxious Weed Control Plan shall be developed and approved in conjunction with the Weed Specialist at the Weld County Department of Public Works. (Department of Planning Services) 10. On site lighting, either direct iliumination or indirect iliumination shall be delineated and identified on the plat. (Department of Planning Services) 3. The following notes shall be placed on the plat: A. In accordance with the Weld County Code, no land, building or structure shall be changed in use or type of occupancy, developed, erected, constructed, reconstructed, moved or structurally altered or operated in the Commercial or Industriai Zone Districts until a Site Plan Review has been approved by the Department of Planning Services. (Department of Planning Services) B. The application may in the future lease a portion of the site to another party. In the event that a portion of the building is proposed to be leased to another party SPR-394 KUM&GO , STORE#913, page 5 in the future, the applicant shail submit a copy of the lease agreement and information regarding the proposed use of the feased portion to the Weld County Building Inspection Department, Mountain View Fire Protection District and the Department of Planning Services for review. Based upon the proposed use and/or impacts of the leased portion, the Department of Planning Services may require a new Site Plan Review application. (Department of Planning Services) C. All liquid and solid wastes (as defined in the Solid Wastes Disposal Sites and Facilities Act, 30-20-100.5, C.R.S., as amended) shall be stored and removed for final disposal in a manner that protects against surface and groundwater contamination. (Department of Public Health and Environment) D. No permanent disposal of wastes shall be permitted at this site. This is not meant to include those wastes specifically excluded from the definition of a solid waste in the Solid Wastes Disposal Sites and Facilities Act, 30-20-100.5, C.R.S., as amended. (Department of Public Health and Environment) E. Waste materials shall be handled, stored, and disposed in a manner that controls fugitive dust, fugitive particulate emissions, blowing debris, and other potential nuisance conditions. (Department of Public Health and Environment) F. The applicant shall operate in accordance with the approved "waste handling plan". (Department of Public Health and Environment) G. The applicant shall comply with all provisions of the Underground and Above Ground Storage Tank Regulations (7 CCR 1101-14). (Department of Public Health and Environment) H. Fugitive dust and fugitive particulate emissions shali be controlled on this site. (Department of Public Health and Environment) I. This facility shall adhere to the maximum permissible noise levels allowed in the Commerciai Zone as delineated in 25-12-103 C.R.S., as amended. (Department of Public Health and Environment) J. Adequate handwashing and toilet facilities shall be provided for employees and patrons of the facility. (Department of Public Health and Environment) K. Adequate toilet facilities (port-a-potty) shall be provided during the construction of the facility. (Department of Public Health and Environment) L. The facility shall utilize the existing municipal sewage treatment system. (Saint Vrain Sanitation District) (Department of Public Health and Environment) M. The facility shall utilize the existing public water supply. (Little Thompson Water District) (Department of Public Health and Environment) N. All potentially hazardous chemicals must be stored and handled in a safe manner in accordance with product labeling and in a manner that minimizes the release of hazardous air pollutants (HAP's) and volatile organic compounds (VOC's). (Department of Public Health and Environment) SPR-394 KUM&GO ,STORE#913, page 6 O. The operation shall comply with all applicable rules and regulations of the State and Federal agencies and the Weld County Code. (Department of Public Heaith and Environment) P. The applicant shall comply with Colorado Retail Food Establishment Rules and Regulations governing the regulation of food service establishments. (Department of Public Health and Environment) Q. Apparatus roads shall be designed and maintained to support the imposed loads of fire apparatus (75,000 pounds). (Mountain View Fire Protection District) R. Effective January 1, 2003, Building Permits will be required to adhere to the fee structure of the Weld County Road Impact Program. (Ordinance 2002-11) (Department of Planning Services) S. Effective August 1, 2005, Building permits issued on the subject site will be required to adhere to the fee structure of the Capital Expansion Impact Fee and the Stormwater/Drainage Impact Fee. (Ordinance 2005-S Section 5-8-40) (Department of Planning Services) T. All structures, including signs, on site must obtain the appropriate building permits. (Departments of Planning Services and Building Inspection) U. Buildings shall conform to the requirements of the various codes adopted at the time of permit application. Currently the following has been adopted by Weld County: 2003 International Building Code; 2003 International Mechanical Code; 2003 International Plumbing Code; 2003 International Fuel Gas Code; and the 2002 National Electrical Code and Chapter 29 of the Weld County Code. (Building Department) V. Exterior illumination of structures and lots shall be restricted as follows: 1. Sources of light shall be shielded so that beams of light will not illuminate onto adjacent properties. 2. Neither the direct nor reflected light from any light source may create a traffic hazard to operators of motor vehicles on public or private streets. W. The facility shall comply with all applicable rules and regulations of the State and Federal agencies and the Weld County Code. (Department of Public Health & Environment) X. The applicant shall submit evidence of a Colorado Discharge Permit System or CDPS permit from the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment (CDPH&E), Water Quality Control Division, to satisfy requirements as delineated in 5 CCR-1002-61. Alternately, the applicant can provide evidence from CDPH&E that they are not subject to CDPS requirements. (Department of Public Health & Environment) Y. Property Maintenance. Property located within Commercial Zone Districts shall be maintained in such a manner that grasses and weeds are not permitted to grow taller than twelve (12) inches. In no event shall the property owners allow SPR394 KUM&GO , STORE#913, page 7 the growth of noxious weeds. (Weld County Codification Ordinance 2000-1) (Department of Pianning Services) Z. There shall be no staging or parking of vehicles on Pacific Circle or other parcels. Utilize off-street parking. (Department of Planning Services) AA. This site plan review shail comply with the notes listed under the Lyons 66 Commerce Business Park, (Reception Number to be determined). (Department of Pianning Services) 4. Prior to the issuance of each building permit: A. The applicant shall submit evidence to the Department of Planning Services that the proposed fire protection system will meet the standards of the Mountain View Fire Protection District. (Department of Pianning Services) B. Buildings shall conform to the requirements of the various codes adopted at the time of permit application. Currently, the following has been adopted by Weld County: 2003 International Building Code; 2003 International Mechanical Code; 2003 International Plumbing Code; 2003 International Fuel Gas Code; 2002 National Electrical Code and Chapter 29 of the Weld County Code. (Department of Building Inspection) D. Buildings shall be designed and constructed in accordance with the provisions of the Fire Code, as ratified by the Weid County Commissioners. (Mountain View Fire Protection District) E. A complete set of building construction plans, including information regarding the types and quantities of all hazardous materials proposed for storage or use, must be submitted to the Fire District for review and approval before building permits may be issued. Hazardous materials include but are not limited to: flammable or combustible liquids, flammable gases, corrosive liquids. (Mountain View Fire Protection District) F. The buildings will require an engineered foundation based on a site- specific geotechnical report or an open hole inspection performed by a Colorado registered engineer. Engineered foundations shall be designed by a Colorado registered engineer. (Department of Building Inspection) G. The building will probably be classified as a mixed use, Type M (Convenience Store/ Gas Station). Fire resistance of walis and openings, construction requirements, maximum building height, automatic sprinkler requirements and allowable areas will be reviewed at the plan review. Setback and offset distances shall be determined by Chapter 23 of the Weld County Code. Mountain View Fire Protection District requirements for automatic sprinklers may be different than the requirements of the 2003 International Building Code. (Department of Building Inspection) H. Building height shall be measured in accordance with the 2003 International Building Code for the purpose of determining the maximum SPR-394 KUM&GO , STORE#913, page 8 building size and height for various uses and types of construction and to determine compliance with the Bulk Requirements from Chapter 23 of the Weld County Code. Building height shall be measured in accordance with Chapter 23 of the Weld County Code in order to determine compliance with offset and setback requirements. Offset and setback requirements are measured to the farthest projection from the building. (Department of Building Inspection) I. A plan review is required for each building which a building permit is required. Plans shall include a floor pian. Plans shall bear the wet stamp of a Colorado registered architect or engineer. Two complete sets of plans are required when appiying for each permit. Provide a Code Analysis Data sheet provided by the Weld County Building Department with each Building permit application. (Department of Building Inspection) 5. Upon approval by the Department of Planning Services, the Site Plan Review plat shall be prepared per Section 23-2-160.V of the Weld County Code and submitted to the Department of Planning Services to be recorded. (Department of Planning Services) 6. Prior to Certificate of Occupancy: A. The applicant shall provide written evidence to the Department of Building Inspection from the Little Thompson Water District that all requirements of the District have been addressed and water service has been obtained. (Planning Services) B. The appiicant shall provide written evidence from the St. Vrain Sanitation District to the Department of Building Inspection that all requirements of the District have been addressed and sewer service has been obtained. (St. Vrain Sanitation District) C. A final inspection of occupancy will be required by a member of the Mountain View Fire Protection District. (Mountain View Fire Protection District) D. In accordance with Weid County Code Ordinance 2005-7 approved June 1, 2005, should the plat not be recorded within the required sixty (60) days from the date the Administrative Review was signed a $50.00 recording continuance charge shall be added for each additionai 3 month period. (Department of Planning Services) Site Plan Review conditionally approved by. Date: April 17, 2006 ' Ogle, Planner Jim Birdsall John Davis Go Kum&Go Convenience Store#913 Lyons 66 Pacific, LLC 23111 County Line Road 1310 Commerce Court,Unit 36 Berthoud,CO 80573 Lafayette,CO 80026 w/Enclosures w/o Enclasures SPR-394 KUM&GO ,STORE#913, page 9 Page 1 of 1 Kim Ogle _ _ _._ _ _ __ __ From: Drew Scheltinga Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2007 9:28 AM To: Kim Ogle Cc: kimberly@northernengineering.com Subject: SPR394 Kum & Go#913 Kim The Site Plan for Kum & Go#913 dated 03/01/07 is acceptable to Pubiic Works. All revisions requested by this department have been made. Also, we have received 3 original stamped and signed plan sets (wet sets). From our conversations, I understand Planning has some final drawing changes not directly related to the road and drainage construction aspects of the plans; however, it would be best if the finai sets in Planning and Public Work match. Please ask Kimberly to send Public Works 3 wet sets once all changes have been made. Drew Scheltinga, P. E. Weld County Engineer 1111 H Street P. O. Box 758 Greeley, CO 80632 970-304-6496 X3750 dscheltinga@co.weld.co.us 05/31/2007 Page 1 of 1 Kim Ogle _ _ _ _ _ _.. __ _ From: Kimberly Dall [kimberly@northernengineering.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2007 11:56 AM To: Drew Scheltinga; Kim Ogle Subject: Kum & Go Mead LOC Attachments: Public Improvements Opinion of Costs 3-13-07.pdf Hi Drew and Kim, I have attached our cost estimate for the improvements for the Kum & Go to be located at Lyons 66 Pacific Commerce Park, can you answer a couple of questions regarding the estimate? First, is the LOC for the total amount, or do we need to add a 15% contingency or the like to the total? Second, does the County have a specific form they like to follow for Letters of Credit, or can Kum& Go use their form? Is the LOC irrevocable? What is the process for Kum & Go Yo get that money back once construction is complete? I think that once we get the LOC figured out, we'll be sending the final site plan mylars and the 3 sets of wet-stamped engineering plans to you. Thanks for your help! Kimberly J. Dall, EI Nor[hern Engineering zoo South College Avenue, Suite ioo Fort Collins,CO 80524 Phone: (9�o)22i-4i58 xiz6 FAX: (97o)22i-4159 www,northernenzineering.com 05/31/2007 APPLICATION .., .., FOR PLANNING DEPARTMENT USE DATE RECEIVED: RECEIPT#/AMOUNT# /$ CASE#ASSIGNED: APPLICATION RECEIVED BY PLANNER ASSIGNED: ParcelNumber ��Q,.2-Jc�'-Q-"�—�� - (12 digd number-fou�d on Tax I.D.information.obf�nable at the Weld CouMy Asse�ors Office,or�:��:: Legal Description � ,Section_, Township_North, Range_Wesi LotBlock: Zone District: p . Total Ac.r�eag'e`: , Overlay District: FEE OWNER S)DF THE PROP�ERTY: 7�� N�U� �h� N a m e . lG C. WorkPhone# •� ' HomePhone#_ EmailAddress: Address: 13I0 �iWYl—W�fy'L,� /w .aT IaN1T �(p (/�FJ'�� GO S�o C i t y / S t a t e / Z i p C o d e N a m e . W ork Phone# Home Phone# Email Address: Address: C � � y / S t a t e / Z i p C o d e N a m e . W ork Phone# Home Phone# EmailAddress: Address: C i t y / S t a t e ! Z i p C o d e APPLICANT OR AUTH O RIZED AG ENT (See Below:ANhor¢�ion must accampany appicafions signed by Aumaizcd A9erdJ N a m e : S1J�Rl(t-�Ml -�y}� 'BI�.14ReuP� (.LL EmailAddress R►?�t.L�s'�Y�7�M•� W ork Phone#9 r0•✓�Z• �$PlL_Home Phone# �-1� �ziii O�t�rrr-f UNF AW�'� B�iD lA Qt�C7� -.. Address: " ---- ----- - -- C i t y / S t a t e / Z i p C o d e PRO OS SE. Ga'�IK'�� T�� ` I( e hereby depose and state under penatties of perjury that all statements,proposals,and/or plans submitted with orcontainedwRhiniheappiicationaretrueandcorrecttothebestofmy(our)knowtedge. Signaturesofallfeeowners of property must sign this application. If a�Authorized Agent signs,a letter of authorization from all fee owners must be incWded with ihe applicatbn. If a corporation is the fee owner,notarized evidence must be incwded showing the signatory has to legal authority to sign for ihe corporation. .�. ,.� Kum& Go is seeking approval from Weld County to construct a convenience store with gas on the south east quadrant of Colorado State Highway 66 at its intersection with Interstate 25. There are no residential dwellings within 1,000 feet ofthe site. KG will employ up to ten full and part time employees working in shifts of one or two people. The store will be open 24 hours a day. It is difficult to determine the number of patrons at any one time due to the constant traffic, but the ma�cimum number of visitors in the building and at the gas pump should be 25. There will be no animals on site, other than pets in vehicles owned by customers. The equipment will consist of gas pumps serving two vehicles each, food prepazation units such as fryers, hot dog roller grills and pizza ovens, fountain drink dispensers, ice making machines, walk in coolers, reach in coolers, HVAC equipment,cash registers and computers. There will be one building of 3,3500 sq ft to be used as a retail building. The vehicular traffic will consist of automobiles, light trucks, SUV's, motor homes, delivery vehicles bringing merchandise to the store, and petroleum tankers delivering gas. They will turn south off Highway 66 on an access road to be constructed, then turn west on the access road and enter the site from the south. Sewer and water are available near the site. Paper and wet garbage will be removed from the building an placed in dumpsters fully enclosed on three sides with masonry walls and on the fourth side, a slatted gate. A commercial garbage hauler will be engaged to remove the trash several times a week as needed. There will be no other storage of junk or waste. T'he construction timetable is approximately 110 days. A landscape plan is included with the application along with other required drawings. The location is neaz an Interstate exit and surrounded by planned and existing development,both residential and commercial. The azea is served by two existing convenience stores, one of which is small by today's standards. The intersection needs an up to date offering to adequately serve the trade azea. Fire protection is provided by the masonry building, fire extinguishers, and a hydrant on site. .,. � SITE PLAN CERTIFICA'�10N 1(W e)hereey certiry lha�me uses. buildi�gs,and struetures focated on: � lT(OV�5 fiC. .D1M1Mbl� '�A4 V ��--� ° . (legel desWlpllon) ere designatl ana Nill be wnslrueled end opereled In accordanea with the eppliCable Performenoe Standsrds end DletAcl Requlrements for 1he zane tli6trkt as sletad In the W eld �unty Code end In eceorOance wIM eny conditiono imposed by lhs Boerd of Counry Commissioners al Mr lime the proparb Was mneE or rezonsd. 1 untlersteaa mV felluro to eemWy W��n me perfortnanee stenda�ds enAfor any coaditw^s could reaul�in tno coanN��tlatlnB o com0��ence acnon against me. ll�'I./Y1 /�`�ti'�'�7 lwl ' � Signature ot Propeny owns�.�N G��,�, , ��l�'G The roreyoing�nstr ent waa aubscribed-a�d sworn to before ma this�tley ot��L_Lsa.x-0 . w�� q '�..:% . , 2o L:U/ .�Y (.' ' or f .iCi.�' W ITNES3 my hantl ena oMc�al seel. b1g,Comrrttision exD�ss: ��j -:�k_L� } �.._�' � � —`r�� -�- N Publio � �•"'",,.. . _��.�� . . �`_.• ' , y � � _ �, \ � : . _ /'. i � . -+_ „^ ,. �MGV-I0-ZG06 00:201Jd FRph-ADMf 4A709lOit0A 1-Bi0 P,OO�JOE7 p�A96 Y� V� i � ' � ATF OR �QLORAI�O i , ��rteNr ar Tn'wspoFrrnr�on� .� I RFODN 47lU1pFIC (� 1481�mIW BY� . �(07�� 21�4prb 80897 � Urel arb2lafnt I � Otx��er 2I,7.t1D5 . I J7$3aefiiher ' , Sv+lft�d?�sso�latea . 1699 Geaava Cusle Y.vnp�onq co sosai Re:LyoAa 66 PeoiflC Cammetne Parlc vear,�i. Ths Weld Couury�ublie Wo�bepastrrtent hos reqt�eSmd wtittpa doc�teQtotl b;ata CDOT m8ardin8 �'P�B a��a8ondble pettie��r Varioual aspmcu 0£hi!l1lYvay.aC�CsB�d£�ontage road i�e�Vemeata tha�w3ll iavoIva rlfe Lyoms 66 PaclIIo Commcse Padc ptoJxt The follpwing is p �Y al'emd impaovcmc�i: 1. C:o�YC'ucHon PMnae 1 of fho admmcoa park wi]3 ooasist of only Y.ot 1,at�e noreheut coxuer oE che sioe.'he�afi�ntnent of the Ptommge Ro�d will aot ba iacluded wlth this 9:st censavcdon Phese�and Y.ot 1 wlll have w obtain aocess diz�ettY aif o�Snue Highw$Y b6 ttninugh the typ�oaI sa�gle loL amms pmn�it pmcess.'Thls pmcass wI11 be tmGerteken by the]ot owner and is indepmdant�die rAsam�park imptaysmenta. Tha lnter�m t�tap�uy acbcss will be icmwed iL'fhs tlt�s,upcm qp�Pklio2!of 1hE itOnl�,e'1+08d eCCosa. Lyuni 65 wiU assiat ia carmpleang the s'n�1e lot accxas pe�C�prooe�for Loe 1,P6aae 1,i£reqneeted. 2. 'CDOT w;11 counyl�to daiin of in0ecnl�au�e impmvemense rc ia�mte ZS end ffi�way 66.Pert °f��se�ovcmean wi11 in�in9e die lneozpoxntlaa oF ttw developar's destyn uf tealigament of the L251�ioattaga med thruug4�d�e eomr�ve pad�as weu as m mm�omrY op�yv��gnd ct tUs u►t�aaea!!ap vE dte�neN�l�d 2�nmm��e Road/Mead 34eerl,Erighvv�y 66 i�soctton. 3. mOZ'will ptmQhme tuxetleiay ROW t�mnt Uu oWtu+se Of�he John Deese prop0rty to allow for ooeel�tw�ion of the reaiignmcnt of tbe Fmntage Road dlrtedy sonth of d�e cxiattag ineerseedan of Meaa se�see e�!m�hw4y b6,An�oncnge road i.at�manc�unvemeas hsve been desigaea, �d will be consau000d snd petd for by tee ownecs ot ehe enmmence park. 4. CbOT wJll omttpleto�e pzvicessing of the commeace paz9c aCcess pe�it appKcatioa.T'hia pem�i[ wfu 9oomae ap�ovol o�$ee aeetEa ef the fmnago lvaa iralty�uurut,xn� axeleiadoa/doceler��on Iene4 doaE HighwaY 66. The ownea of tbe commer�palc w7i conson�ct the impmvem�fa rathaxlzed by ehln permis 5. Cansteuctton Pheae 2 a!the comme�e pa+9:wl11,lnclnde ehe realignmeet ef tb,e$vttta�e toad ehrouBh ffio enelto psoj.cc�onneotlng to et►e exfem,g sroacage med as cAe soud�wess ooma of the P�.�d�BhwlSy 66 at the aoesEwaa comer of ma project Pliase 2 will conm4onoe after ��P�g�Eht-0f-wqy aoquuitioa�by CDOT!or the FIIjlsway 66 wideaing and tYN£zmttsgm �d�ent t�o MeNd sa+eaL ,. Z0 'd L6b9 b0E 0L6 '0N Xd� SA80M 0I18fld d,LNf10� 413M WH 80:11 3f1J, 900Z-8Z-fl3.� r. ^, � +.�.» anaaeeryya 90lL.DEIi PAC PAC£ 83183 �NOW1B-lOOOJ 07:ZOAM FAON-ACMT +870i6D21� T-660 P.OU3/d08 F-BB5 DEPA,F#'i'ML'N'P OR TAq1YSPORTAT1O1V FiY01oN 4 TfIArPIC � �1��rw�e 10�011 � � • � (�)77G210!W � � , 6. I'de owQar of the�Pg�w11I be�ble in¢�the darign crF the ��Or au111 caaw�ck the remP�'��aignal at the inters�� '��Fcontage rer'�tds impsov�WaY��'rho owaara of tbe aommerce petk wi11 be rpposu�blo fo�PaYinS �- G�tt+x¢oq�has9 3 a�ehe ce�m+oe p�iC wII�ixludc comp�Iedoa of Peez$e CSxcle and tt�e s�inder°F she Prnkcc. 8. Whan CDOT wideae I-25 aQjacent to rbe co�mmenx pmk,�e��zpad will be cul-da.s�etl, . ,1aat of!'-pfm to the snnth of riar oarnm�oo pm3c�mIeaa CDpT,dm tnwa of 11��d m�d/or�Neld ��1'�t0 ill A1Seat8tO dt3iga declSloa. 9- �a8�1,C�O'['!e taepontible!b�We ac4utsitions end dfe eommmrrs ptrk�s rsspoa�{ble 3'or fi'°°�roed�ig�meat coastsicdon m Weld Coun!y rrtaadacds. �Y�►shouid hsve�Y 4wstions.Plcaee do not hrsitgte to contaet me. Thsak you, 93nocsoly, ^ dl,�Q.tt►GC-I �-- � � , , H1c�.Idler Acoeas 11�a�er xr. 5!e � E0 'd 16b9 b0E 0L6 '0N Xd.� SA80M OllBfld h,LN00� 413M Wd 60:i[ 3(l,l 900Z-8Z-A3.i � • • . . � . ■ � . � � � � � . � . , •,. , . � , �. , � � :l/. I • .f :' .�.: 1 '1.. ' / NI' l. ' /I / 1 .i / 1 ,1 / ' 1 I � ' . � • � c ` M ' •-• �♦�•�•�•�•�•�•�`��•�•�♦�•�♦�•�'�'�♦�'�•�♦�•�'�'�•�,�•�•�♦�•�'�•�•�•�•+ ��S_�.?�"�'-'-'��'��:.�.9AD�:�s�L��a��j�i��y�"�r�� i-�"��J�%��. ��f�� .�1��►�� ;��•��.��_��.��_�.:►�� r�rJA��r��rr�'��A�/�� i�i I,► • • • lS ! • �T � • I/��• • • • �� 4�' t w, T r- � � �.,. ��w�w�c,,.1,.,�r��v`��iri� .. ;,�,�� ^r ��-w-. • • w • /"`� a=�.�a. � s �,.r'—�—�—�_�/� /s.'. ��r�r�i��.i��:.i��G�3��1►�'�i�i�i � �Ii��SiL� �� • A • • ��`�� II�f:'�1�II�O��f�r��o��w�=u'��i�i � .. ��,��►;i,;�y�f,�q�,f►;{rf+r��'�i��l.��;S`,,��L,,,��1�:�� 1��r►��lOrr��4�(.'1�L'��"'�"'��i �I/��w��r�'�d��r��r�w..��/�! 1��t��►��ti ,��,��*;�'�;�'�'.,�=��n��'`y�.�'�'�;�'��u�V1�r�;�;�;�;�;��'�i b♦ •4 . t �� U� � � � � A�►��♦ J�-�-J��I�i� • 1��..r4..>Y�'► ►�'Y'+.N. 1��.�'V ►��14' ��< � ► � � ��fU� o ♦ ♦�►�♦ w��'�'��i�i♦ ♦ 1��'►►�� J��I�A♦ ♦f.�� U��1��►��{.��1♦ ♦• i��l1��w��A ��4�� 1��.%��►��"':�_""""'"' :�'��:��:��t��*��i�� 1�f��i�i��i��?��i i i�i r i i i�i��i��i�� t r ��I�i's��y:i��1��1�/�� 1�1�i��r'� ►�'��►�� 1��>y�i��1�v'��r��1��►��4�...��{,��♦� ` i1�j�GO��i��i��1��r+>��e.��►��'T�1,`..a:1�� 4��%��1��►'��'►fl��a�'��r��.�1��/�� ♦��-�'�'" ♦��►�� '�'�' Ir��u�'. ) �. .�o��. ♦�♦ �6�9�►��f��-�1�^�'��/��Q��".�� IN��r�-'.-�:f.. ��o��n��♦ �� y��1��,��S��i��i�� ►'��►�i►��.��v,�*�� 1 �~i'd1►�� . �� ii!►��:�!�!�!�!�!�!��!�!�!i!�!�!�!�!�!�!�!�!�!�!�!i!i!�!��i�i�i�Q.�i�i1.�. �� , � � �� I� -. ' � � � , i ( 1 . •r� rl I � 1 . .1 : . 1 1 . 1 'II ' .� � � ArR-ea-ax �S:11 PM SWIFT 6 Fl330CIATE3 303 651 T27i P-02I Apr-04-01 13t15 LSC�MDsmver 303 38a 1107 p.pti ' I [.SC:TitA�l3POpTA7'IUN C"CINSULTAN'I'5. INL•. 18M9 YorY SIrcN � I�nvrr. �tlt{lUb "'._ �...-,;. 13W)d3.LlIU6 . ... ' ' FAK�1QllJJ�-IIU7 .. �{'1W�t�1kdl'IYCdFtl.e��lp . r � �veb tiue: hrtp:llw..u.l��dv,u. C: . A ti, I�f;, Aprit 4, �pp1 Mr. ,1ahn n��is I Boulder Pncific In�., � c/o J.J I{inefkther � 9wifl 41c Araoclnmt � 4;�1 a]•' ,Sufrc 2�z Lossmont, CU HOSt7] ' i Re: (-ZSJ9tato Highwny b6 Commcreiel Wdd Couaty, Coloredo (L9C M0012001 �eu Mr, nevld: Thir lr�ler�K pn A�ddrtldum m che 9epttmboe, 1CGp vaf7ic Irc�pq�t aeudy ior che yroposea ta5� etate P;iqhway 6b uimrr.Crclal derclapment in Weld County,Colotado. !n tbe April�.2001 meeting � r�tth weld Couney, Diane Hou�htaling reqyooted r letterqumtifyins�ye perreni impRet that the propuyer.� �mmerclal Cevetopment witl have oa StaM lhghwey 66 ae�j�cent W tns aix, Ar the I nUa�hrd Pti�un; 14 tn�m thR 3Bptett�ber,z000 eexn►e�ee,paec epxiy�;ILetr�tea,we r�dm�te that che Yco� 2p20 pvereq,r, daily ttnRlc ah Suta HI61aw�y 66 ua(jacrnt a the eite will be approsimately 41,4a�;vehirla�perd,ly, Tkcµttachedpgureal�o111uKcrate�threthee�tlmateddallyaite•BeaernCW � �ruffie �tin y�x��. f{�4,hwMy 66 aQ��«nl tp thC 41ttl tVW be approxl�tAtaly A,D00 vuhleiee per day, Briied c�n Iheee ernflle dtojectioos, it is eatimamd thMt tl:e traffie from !he prnpa�ed commttcinl devalopment will cnntribute appreximrte�y 9,� pe��nt [o the tutal valifo on l3tatn Highu�qy 60 a�ijncrnt ta ihc n4r in Yrer 2pZ0, we erust that Ihiq Addendurn w�p asaiat you wftlf[�lrthcrpl�nnlr.gfbrtho prnpoecd 1-25/8sptr HiqFw•�y 66 nunrrcrclal devrlopment. Pleaae cell if we cRn t� otfurther asefstu�cc. Rrepactfull,y ru6mi��u�y, [.9C 7runcpo��utinn qohsultanca, lno. i �1?'�.......� . I BcnJnmin r,w:�lcmun I g'CW/wc � ��d��M' IT na:mn�.�niawnNwuuotnw�.xw,.....0 . ' I I 60 'd L669 b0£ 0L6 '0N Xd� SA80M 0I18Ild A,LNf100 413M Wd 80:11 30,L 900Z-8Z-83� �. ,� EMERGENCY CONTACT tNFORMATWN PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT 9 8usinsss Name. �Z" y.� h,___�� Phone:4�i�'_�_4��rYJ-'� �l aaar..s: f ^� Busfnesa Owner: i��'Ll�l'f' 6 . �..�- _ _ P�one: 'yJ)�J��J /l �'�� HapaAddrosa• C��j{;'..,J, �Y C•SIOVYY'�W l��-6ti7��_C�►Y• ��Y e� ��4-C�� ! t Llst tMee persans In the ads b De aaled in fhe event af an amrgency: . N�!�1 T�7LE AODRESS PHQNE �)o�j, nh'1�-� 5('6t"2 1�"1GVV1ltA�( Sv� �e;v' ` r.ut �� d7a� �f�ii�lYe Gl��' `�`' "3��'d$a� �� r� Et� hf��, �j c:�G+?. ?s rvr^, �ar�v�' f�0�� ;��-6) �° � Bualna�s Hours: � ' ` �°1'a'— i— 7yps d Afarm: Nona Burqler HoWUP Fi�e�l 811ent Au�M Nama end aEdna d alerm compeny: /� __; Loc.tlwtof 8.fs: i�l" R t(' �f"I"dyl !` �(J,/n Y� IAIBCfLLANE0U3 MFORMATION: �' � Numb�r uf�ntya:t doo�s fn Ns M�np:,c� lAdtaNi): � ' n n�-�{- a/'� Ir� � Is alcadol ibr�d i10Yilding9 �� loe�tlon(s)- �rLk" iY� �Id'� )n �'�i�✓ Are en�ps sbrad in buitltrp? J � lonUm(�): Aro�apoos sbr�d in Dupdinp? J'\1 C� Loutbn(ax The folbwh+p pmprams an olferod a pubb��rvios ot 1he W eld County SM�MPs OMIa. PMaas indtcNs th� programs of inWwt �_PDysiod SeouAlY CMck Crtns Pnventlon Pnp�l� E ' M.�n.�«�w: Y'a`c- �a�k.r�is '�1�'G4u��i')/t� �a.t�t=�t�� c��l�, i � lF.,C� 1(W�)Mr�b�r daposs end shM uader p�MMks of pvjury dat�Y MaYmaib.PioPosai�.rldlor plrts aubmilMd wM or mmIMO wldYn�a oppNcallon�r�tiu��M cortsot0o!�s bsdof my(our)Icnowhdpa Sqn�Euros ottl iN ownera a P�OsRY must�tOn 16k app�cdba. M an AurioelaW/1�nt sipns��hlMr d suf�o�HHo�+fmm�11 N�ormws mwt bs N�dud�d wM d+�appllcNion.lt�corpara�an k 1M iM owner.noEwlaW evidencs mu�t b�YmYd�d sliovrYip Ms NDn w s �a�lw� br Ihs P°nW". � � (' a oc neWro: orAutior�edAWnt 91pn�Wra:OrmaraAWwAc�d/lpsnt DaOs 02b08/2006 12:33 3036667991 ^.. BOULDER PAC ,1 PAGE 04l05 LIST MINERAI.�WN�ons 66)D MINERAL LESSEHS Subject Property: Township 3 North. Ranae 68 West 6 h P M Weld CounXy CO Section 26: That part of the NWY. more par"ticuiariy oescribed in that certain Warranty Deed dated March 1, 2000, recorded under Rec. No. 2755526 of ihe real property records of Weld County. Crews &Zeren, LLC, a mineral title company, states that to the best of its Knowledge the following is a true and eccurate list of the names and addresses of the mineral owners and mineral leasehold owners having an interest in the Subject Property, based upon the real property records of Weld Counof thisllistshallSfoaall were verified a1 February 20, 2005. A facsimile or photocopy purposes, be as valid as the original hereof. Dated this 2n° day of March, 2005. CREWS & ZEREN, LLC �,� gy; Wi i rfi G. Crews, CPL Certified Professional Landman #3477 MineraJ�. Mineral Leasehold Owns�s: Lyons 66 Pacifio LLC Kerr-McGee Rocky Mountain Corp. 1224 Commerce Court, Unit 6 1999 Broadway, Suite 3600 Lafayette, CO 80026 Denver, CO 80202 Creu�s e1 Zercn,GLC �{vura!?klt serv�c�s (970J 351-0733 P.O. BoX396337 y e 1 u 2 �jrt,C(970)�5]-0867 G�ee(ty, CO 8 0 633-06 06 °11 f . 02/BB/2006 12:33 30366�`�901 B0.LDER PAC ^ PAGE 65/05 i -,I.� I Ililll Alll i��l III IIII IIIIII Illlill III IIIII IIII illl , ,-_ ��+' . "� 2755626 0311612000 10:41R JR SukiTStlRamoto `---� '`1 of E R 10.00 D 70_00 Weld County CO . SPECIAL WARRANTV DEED TEIIS D&ED, Mede ihie 1ST day of MAACH, 2000 between LovemoRt I¢vebl��ritC COmp�ny, w Coloiodo LimiG�d PastneT�h{(+ ot the County of ARABAI�OE and &tete of COLORADO, gsantor,�d Lyone 66 Eacific LLC, a Colorado Limited Liebility ComHany wha.c 1e9e1 addmcae ia 3a10 COMMcnCE �OVAT, nnlTT #36 Vnil�Coip, LAFAYETTE, WLORADO a0026 of the Co�ty of weld and State oE Colorado, gzanceae: qlq•p7EgggTy �ypC Ghe gcactor(s) foz md in consideratian o! CLe cum of Savext I1mmxED _, TEOIISANU IR7I1 00/300� (S700�OOV.uO) Uollais� et�u r�ceiyt �vE ev{Eicicney�hc Chp�senb / dYreby aeknowledged� H1�9 graatad, bargaine6, eeld enS aonveyed, nnd by �11, conve an8 conEizm unto Cha 9rantee(e), THI&R heirc end DO qzant, bargain, a Y aseigne Poravez, a11 real Yr pesCY• ��8��ba� v'eh f.mprovdeaeriDedfna¢lollor.aae�� 1y.ng �p,v and bcia9 ia Gha County oi W�ld and State oE Calorado, \ $EB 6XHTHIT "1�" AT7ACHED HEAB'YV �fl �+�E A PART FIER00P .. _.. . ...... . _ - ' _ .... _.�. -�—.� . ... - aleo known by streee and numbex as SBC oE I-25 anfl Colo. Hwy• 66 Vnincoxp, Mend, coloraao easaz TOOs'PIIBR Mith a17. and s'rtainiuyhe�hQichetr�ev�a'ulonaandprev.reieao.tr�maindar end balen9�ng, or ie �aywiae app remaindere, reaCe, �•�uae and pio£5Ee ChereoEt and flll Cha eateur ri9Et, ESGle, int�rest, elsla and dem+nd ahateoev�z oEvtkh 9*�her�diEamenenr nQ +�PurEenncee� of �n an6 to the atwa b�ryainod p=��. ' Tp pApR ANO To ftOLD CL� tlala pzeml.aav ebove bergaln�d wnd deeez bed wiee eppusienenc�o. a11Ee tLe giaatee(a). ITS Leire end eeeigne Lozaver. The yrdntorle), fnr xT5 Leii� and pereanal repraseat�tivee or suceeeeorn, DO cavenant and agree thqn�e IT Bh311 and vill NARRAMI AAD p01t8VH7� nEFEqu ihe nbwa-bacyaiaad D��aivbtia11�n119 1eC and peaca�le po�a�adas�Glaiminggthetrrhole o Tenyspartathereol�by,�CLrm+9h or undex evary peraoa Lhe giaator IN NI 89 P, tha greaior(e) RAS axaeutad Chia de5ed�o,Y the dete eat or ��e. . a Coloiado Limi P t/�re�tsl . � �Falph D. iCa , �en¢�a ai'b+�.� � . _ -�',[p�y K. J � eral PartaPs' . AKINER By HO �1 r EY BY. S�P K. l. 1 PazVter -Pa's� . STA'i'¢ OF CO RAI70 � �• T . }ss: TfiE YOrego$J� nstrvma+�� wa� ackno�lcdgo efor� Coun[y oT �I�ItAeY.H�6 } me [his 15T day oE tdARCA, 2000 bv Ralph D. XauEman aa Genaral 8aztrier of 7nvaront Invesvrent Cacq�anY� a Nlorado L1miY.ed a�d Ra1Ph D. Kau�. Z�srS'1 K. Jen5en ard K. Stinall as Gen�al Paztn� P��lP � P'i my h and e.C r.{al seal. of tioa'lon�.CavE'y��.Gmeral parb�er of Y 7ova�nnt In�egtrent Yado y com ' n e,cpi � .�p e7Qda- Lind.tod Dutnershlp O7q.,��. ��e, QI.�p _' L� nmmARY FUBLIC S ;� 5299 DTC ffivd. Suite 940 No.16. Rev. 3-BS �S� Englewood, COLORADO BO111 -►�.•,,��1;�:r� . , OR Gp�O lr^' � r �l 02/.08/2006 12:33 3036667991�. HOULDER PAC ^, PAGE 02/05 rage i ui � ?rcasurets Tax Scarch Result Pagc . � Ftome > Depart_ments > .LreasurefiOffice > Tax S ar h > Tax Search Resuits 7ax Search Details IMormation tor tax ear. 2005 a able In 2006 Propertv Information Owner Name: Lyons 66 Paclfic Llc Addrese: C�; Weld Aeeout+! R4767886 NUMber. Parcel 120726000034 Number: 25608-a pt nw4 26 3 68 beg n4 cor sec sOdi3'w 40' to n In hwy 66 589d25'w Lega) Address• 12i0.76' to pob sOdi3'w 1279.93' s09d25'w 3325.86' nOd2S'a 206.37' ' n16d0'e 1088.60' n85d59'e 500.89' n89d25'e 529.35' to pob situs: weld 00000c�000 Valua Informatio� Actual Land Vslue $10,201.00 Acsessed Land Value �2,960.00 ACtuel Improved Valuo $O:OQ Aoscssed Zr»provad Value ¢OAO � Actual Tota� Value $10,201,00 Aseessed Total Value $2,960.00 payment Information - Total Tax AmounL: 5220.04 Frst Half Amount: $0.00 Second Half Amount: ;0.00 SR. Exemption: �0.00 Full Amount Pald: 50.00 Current Balance: $220.04 - Half Bdlance: $110.02 Full Balance, $220.04 IF an of the followin fields are "YES" lease contact Che 7reasurer's Office for more informatio�. � Tax Status Tax Lie�s: - No Tax Aroa 2335 Prior Taxes Due: No Senior Homestead Exemptfon: No 5pecial Improvemmt Taz: No Mill �eW 74.34 http;//www.co.weld.eo.us/departrnent�ltrcnsur�dwx/ta�c_reaults.cfin 1/8/06 MAPS ,.. .. WELD COUNTY ROAD ACCESS INFORMATION SHEET Weld County Departrnent of Public Works 111 H Sireet, P.O. Box 758, Greeley, Colorado 80632 Phone: (970 )356-0000, Ext. 3750 Fax: (970) 304-6497 Date: Road File #: Other Case#: RE# : Phone �. ApplicantName � City O\NE Stale Z�P�� Address r,�t� �i1R1� 2. Address or Locatlon of Access �,'� l L`��S Q��' �� glock Lot�_W eld Sectian Township Range Subdrviswn County Road #: Side of Road Distance from nearest intersection 3. Is there an existing access to the property? Yes No �_ #of Accesses�— 4. Proposed Use: � Permanent ❑ ResidentiaVAgricultural Co�erca�strial❑ Other O Temporary ❑ Subdivisan � xw,�#•R{y1r*}}k}fe**YM�ff**lrft#Rt#tf Y1r+F*}!'R*'Rt##f!/tfY*R**#**4#t*#ife#**kR*'R1''Rf#R#4R�RYf'*!t*laM4}rt**feY�O�k��DY 5. Site Sketch ��% �� k�"'—""" �� Legend for Access Descriptlon: � � pG = AgriculWral RES = Residential O&G = Oil 8 Gas D.R. = Ditch Road �M1O p = House p = Shed Q =Proposed Access • =ExistingAccess p/i�.lf1C. � URl.� NT � � #4t!!Y!}t�'3*!'t►4f1rf#*tYrYtYfR#1'*#i*1iR*f1t OFFICE USE ONLY: Accidents Date Road ADT Date Date Date Accidents Road �T Size Length Drainage Requirement Culvert Special Conditions ❑ Installation Authorized ❑ Information Insufficient TiUe: Reviewed BY� REFERRAL LIST ^ REFERRAL LIST � Name: Jim Birdsall, c/o Kum & Go Case#SPR-394 Countv Towns & Cities Fire Districts _Attorney _Ault _Ault F-1 z Health Department _Berthoud _Berthoud F-2 $$$ _Extension Office _Brighton _Briggsdale F-24 _Emergency Mgt Office- Ed Herring _Dacono _Brighton F-3 z Sheriffs O�ce _Eaton _Eaton F-4 z Public Works _Erie _Fort Lupton F-5 _Housing Authority _Evans _Galeton F-6 _Airport Authority z Firestone _Hudson F-7 z Building Inspection _Fort Lupton _Johnstown F-8 _Code Compliance_S.-Ann_N-Beth _Frederick _LaSalle F-9 _Kim Ogle (Landscape Plans) _Garden City z Mountain View F-10 _Lin (Addressing Change of Zone) _Gilcrest _Milliken F-11 _Assessor, Chris Woodruff _Greeley _Nunn F-12 _Grover _Pawnee F-22 State _Hudson _Platteville F-13 _Div. of Water Resources _Johnstown _Platte Valley F-14 _Geological Survey _Keenesburg _Poudre Valley F-15 _Department of Health _Kersey _Raymer F-2 z Department of Transportation _LaSalle _Southeast Weld F-16 _Historical Society _Lochbuie _Union Colony F-20 _Water Conservation Board _Longmont _Wiggins F-18 _Oil&Gas Conservation Commission z Mead _W indsor/Severance F-17 _Milliken Division of Wildlife _New Raymer _South Hwy 66 (Loveland) _Northglenn _North Hwy 66 (Greeley) _Nunn _Division of Minerals/Geology _Pierce Commissioner _Platteville Soil Conservation Districts _Severance _Big Thompson/ FTC _Thornton _BoulderValley/Longmont _Windsor _Brighton/SE Weld Centennial Counties _Greeley/West Greeley _Adams _Platte Valley _Boulder W est Adams _Broomfield _Little Thompson _Larimer Federel Government Aqencies Other _US Army Corps of Engrs _School District RE- _USDA-APHIS Vet Service _Central Colo. Water Conservancy _Federal Aviation Admin (Structures _RR over 200 ft or w/in 20000 ft of Pub _Highland Ditch Airport _Art Elmquist (MUD Area) - Info Only _Federal Communications Comm _ REFERRALS W/COMMENTS , �, "� . . � Memo To: Kim Ogle From: Ken Poncelow Date: February21, 2006 Re: SPR-394 The Sheriff's Office approves this plan. Please notify the developer/owner that the Sheriffs Office would be willing to assist in the development of a security plan for the site free of charge. If this is of interest, please have them contact me. 1 . • ^ � � DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES BUI�DING INSPECTION � � NORTH OFFICE 918 10`"Street GREELEY, COLORADO 80631 PHONE (970) 353-6100, EXT.3540 FAX (970) 304-6498 C. SOUTHWEST OFFICE 4209 CR 24.5 COLORADO PHONE (O0)6 2O 210 O t887o0 FAX (720)652-4211 February 27, 2006 Kum & Go Store #913 Site Plan Review Permit for a convenience Store/Gas Station in the MUD. USR-1543 1. A building permit shall be obtained prior to the construction of any new building. 2. A plan review is required for each building for which a building permit is required. Plans shall include a floor plan. Plans shall bear the wet stamp of a Colorado registered architect or engineer.Two complete sets of plans are required when applying for each permit. Include a Code Analysis Data sheet provided bythe Weld County Building Department with each Building permit application. Building plans shall also be submitted to Mountain View Fire Protection District or their approval. 3. Buildings shall conform to the requirements of the various codes adopted at the time of permit application. Currentlythe following has been adopted by Weld County:2003 International Building Code; 2003 International Mechanical Code; 2003 International Plumbing Code; 2003 International Fuel Gas Code; and the 2002 National Electrical Code and Chapter 29 of the Weld County Code. 4. The buildings will probably be classified as follows: M (Convenience store/gas station). All buildings used by the public, including the bathrooms shall be accessible to persons with disabilities. Fire resistance of walls and openings, construction requirements, maximum building height and allowable areas will be reviewed at the plan review. Set back and offset distances shall be determined by the Zoning Ordinance. 6. Building height shall be measured in accordance with the 2003 International Building Code forthe purpose of determining the maximum building size and height for various uses and types of construction and to determine compliance with the Bulk Requirements from Chapter 23 of the Weld County Code. Building height shall be measured in accordance with Chapter 23 of the Weld County Code in order to determine compliance with offset and setback requirements. When measuring buildings to determine offset and setback requirements, buildings are measured to the farthest projection from the building. Property lines shall be clearly identified and all property pins shall be sfaked prior to the first site inspection. Please contact me for any further information regarding this project. Sinc ly, � o er V gil � Building Officia� � � a � Weld County Planning Department � RECE1� , ;n�+T1�s��T BUILDING � � F� FEg 2 1 2006 MAR 8 2006 ,� Weld County �te�� C. COLORADO February 14, 2oos The W eld County Department of Planning Services has received the following item for review: Applicant Kum & Go Store#913 Case Number SPR-394 c/o Jim Birdsall Please Reply By March 17, 2006 Planner Kim Ogle Project Site Plan Review for a Convenience Store/Gas Station in the MUD Legal Lot 1, Lyons 66 Pacific Commerce Park, being part of the NW4 of Section 26, T3N, R68W of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado. Location East of and adjacent to I-25 Frontage Road, and south of and adjacent to State Highway 66 Parcel Number 1207 26 000034 The application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Please reply by the above listed date so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Any response not received before or on this date may be deemed to be a positive response to the Department of Planning Services. If you have any further questions regarding the application, please call the Planner associated with the request. Please note that new information may be added to applications under review during the review process. If you desire to examine or obtain this additional information, please call the Department of Planning Services. ❑ We have reviewed the request and find that it does/does not comply with our Comprehensive Plan ❑ We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests. � See�'. G6"v�rtv�.t�d ��'�` ��_,,.,�� Comments 7k.�. 'e�wk 8oa�d. i's fv W�- �.�'t/"�-Q�:vu�.f�vcu"�p. „�.i i�s �A.uu.�'u� a�.eu. a.u.�C,d1�p.uiriuR �fCc� `�oun. � q.�.ew+�2� r,�„ �-fz .�i�x.r.�, a•utQ �� - �� ,��,u;,�.� �.G'� � ,n.��.. � � ��.v. �. ��. Signature //�r�QD. �_,f.cFno�.�aa. 7r►2vi, �f.{�,_ �ate ,3 6 0� _�� Agency "��2✓� d� �C(.a,� �� 4Weld County Planning DepL•i 4209 County Road 24.5,Longmont,CO 80504 i• (720)652-4210 exL8730 {• (720)652-4211 fax " MOUNiq�N MOUNTAIN VIEW FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT F E Administrative Office: � S 9119 County Line Road• Longmont, CO 80501 E fU (303) 772-0710• FAX (303) 651-7702 heW March 7, 2006 Nir. Kim Ou,,le Weld County Planning Departmeni 918 10�' Street ('ireeley, CO 80631 Dear Mr. Ogle: i have reviewed the submitted material and preiiminary site plans for the Kum Xc Go Store #913 proposed for Lot 1, in the Lyons 66 Pacific Commerce Park (Case Number SPR-394). The Fire District has the following comments with regard to the plans: • The total building appeazs to be abait 3,350 squaze feet and not protected with an automatic fire sprinkler system I� accordance with Appendix III-A of the Uniform Fire Code, the required fire flow for the building is 1,500 gallons per minute, measured at a residual pressure of 20 pounds per square inch. The proposed fire hydrant location is acceptable as shown on the plans. .4 letter from the water supplier should be provided to verify the required fire flow is available. • Fire apparatus access to the building appears to be adequafe as indicated on the plans. Fire apparatus access roads must be designed and maintained to support the imposed loads of fire apparatus (75,000 pounds). The elevation sheet did not show the height of the canopy. The canopy must provide clearance to at least 13 feet, 6-inches. • The dumpster location appears acceptable provided that it will not be located beneath a combustible roof eave. • Building construction plans and the final site plan showing the gross square footage of the buildine and building construction type must be submitted to the Fire District for review and approval before building permits may be issued. • A final inspection of the occupancy will be required by a member of the Fire District before any Certificate of Occupancy is issued from Weld County. Station 1 Sta�ion 2 Station 3 Station 4 Sta[on 5 Station fi Station] 9119 Cnty Line R0. 14308 MeaO 5�.,UnR B P.O.Bov 5]5 P.O.Box 11 10911 Do�bin Run 50 Bonanxa Dc P.O.Box 40 Longmont,CO Longmont,CO 299 Palmer Ave. 8500 Niwo[Foatl Lafayette,CO Erie,CO 100 So.Porest St. 80501 80504 Mead CO 80542 Niwo�,CO 80544 80026 80516 Dacono.CO 80514 .. . .__.__.... . � �. Mr. Kim Ogle March 7, 2006 Page Two The Fire District reserves the right to make further comments as the project proceeds. Nothing in this review is intended to authorize or approve of any aspect of this project that dces not comply with all applicable codes and standards. We appreciate being involved in the planning process. Should you have any questions, please contact me at (303) 772-0710. Sincerely, ��i._ � `(�\� �.- � � � � � LuAnn Penfold � Fire Marshal LMP/lp cc: project file tPos.o2.o� ... � a MEMORANDUM �� TO: Kim Ogle, Dept. of Planning Services DATE: March 13, 2006 W�`Pc. � O FROM: Drew Scheltinga, P. E., Public Works Department �C�� - COLORADO SUBJECT: SPR-394 Kum & Go#913 (Site Plan Review) This site plan is for a convenience store with gas facilities to be constructed on Lot 1 of Lyons 66 Pacific Commerce Park which is located in the southeast quadrant of I-25 and SH 66. At the time of this review, the final plat for Lyons 66 has not been recorded and the time frame for construction on SH 66 and the I-25 Frontage Road (aka Mead Street to the north) is unknown; however, final design for all infrastructure improvements are complete which allows for a site plan review. Access: A traffic impact study, dated July 2005, by Kimley-Horn and Associates was submitted and reviewed by Weld County's traffic engineering consultant, Felsburg Holt & Ullevig (FHU). A copy of FHU's comments by Chris Fasching, dated February 1, 2006, is attached. There is one major concern. Kimley-Horn's report analyzed the intersection of SH 66 a�d Mead Street as a full movement intersection. When SH 66 is reconstructed, the intersection will be a three- quarter movement with west bound left turns eliminated. Because the SH 66 reconstruction is anticipated in the very near future, Kimley-Horn's study should be revised to analyze the intersection as a three-quarter movement and the impacts addressed. The other comments in FHU's review are not major but should be addressed in the revised study. In the future, access to the site will be off of Pacific Circle as shown in the application materials. Until the I-25 Frontage Road and Pacific Circle are constructed, a temporary access to SH 66 will be required. Weld County understands, the Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT) has agreed to allow a temporary access. What turning movements are allowed at the temporary access will be determined by CDOT. Also, requirements for the removal of the temporary access will be set by CDOT. If the temporary access is in place when the I-25 Frontage Road and Pacific Circle are constructed, the temporary access shall be removed. Weld County is available to assist in the coordination of these issues with the applicant and CDOT. A copy of the CDOT permit and plans showing the temporary access and how it ties into the site are required. Kimley-Horn's study recommends the temporary access to SH 66 be separated from the Mead Street intersection a minimum of 250', which would be at the far west edge of the site. That would line up with the shared access shown on the site plan which works well. Public Works has no objection to the shared access on the line between Lots 1 and 2 as shown on the site plan but Lot 2 may belong to a different owner in the future. A mutual access easement along the entire length of the line between Lots 1 and 2 similar to the easement between Lots 14 and 15 is required. This may be accomplished by adding an easement to the record plat before it is recorded. I provided this recommendation to John Davis in an email on March 10, 2006. Page 1 of 2 M\PLANNING—DBVELOPMENT RP,VI2WVSPR-Stte Plan R<view�SPR-39A Kum&Go OOC ,.., - Site Plan: Sheet G1 contains SWPPP notes; therefore, note 3 on Sheet S1 that refers to the Town of Wellington Erosion Contcol standards can be eliminated. Section 23-2-160 R 6 of the Weld County Code (WCC) requires minimum 40' flare radii in commercial developments. The radii shown on the site plan are 25'. Large vehicles will not be able to enter the site without crossing into the opposite lane. There is no obvious solution. The applicant must address the problem. Telephone, Gas and electric service must be shown in accordance with Section 23-2-160 R 7 of the WCC. Site plan certifications shall be shown on the drawings in accordance with Section 23-2-160 W 6 of the WCC. In the Tabulation Box on Sheet C 1 the number of parking spaces required has a question mark. Appendix 23 B of the WCC requires 17 spaces which is the number of spaces shown in the plan. Drainage: A Preliminary Drainage and Erosion Control Study, dated January 19, 2006, by Northern Engineering Services has been provided. A detailed review and memo will be forthcoming; however, there is a major concern that will need to be addressed. The study correctly indicates drainage for this site was master-planned with the Lyons 66 development and that retention will be provided by the subdivision's pond. At this time, the subdivision's detention pond has not been constructed. The applicant must address the existing lack of detention. The applicant shall address the comments listed above to complete the Public Works Department review process. The review process will continue only when all appropriate elements have been submitted. Issues of concern must be resolved with the Public Works Department prior to issuing grading or construction permits. PC: SPR-394 Kum & Go (Site Plan Review) Email & Original: Kim Ogle, Dept. of Planning Services PC by Post & Email Applicant: Jim Birdsall, The Birdsall Group LLC PC by Post Engineer: Kimberly Dall, Northern Engineering PC by Post CDOT: Gloria Hice-Idler, Region 4 Page 2 of 2 M�.NLANNING-DEVELOPMENT REVIEW\SPR-Sv<Plan Rcvicw\SPRJ94 K�m&Go.D0C .-. ^ From: Chris.Fasching [mailto:Chris.Fasching@FHUENG.COM] Sent: Wednesday, February 0l, 2006 8:07 AM To: Peter Schei; Drew Scheltinga Cc: Jeremy.Hahn Subject: Kum &Go TIA Review - SH 66/Mead Street Peter and Drew, The following are quick technical comments regarding the S.H. 66 Kum & Go TIS completed by Kimley-Horn and Associates dated July 2005. 1) The study proposes constructing a gas station/convenience market with 16 fueling positions on the southwest corner of the Mead StreeUState Highway 66 intersection. The trip generation estimates and the passby assumptions are reasonable. However, the trip distribution assumptions could potentially be off. No site traffic was assumed to/from the south via the frontage road and the same amount of new site traffic was assigned to Mead Street north of SH 66 (there are already two service stations on the north side of SH 66, so we doubt there will be many trips from this development oriented to the north) as to the east via 66 (which may be low). We would be happy to chat with the consultant regarding trip distribution percentages and possible modifications. 2) The site will ultimately gain access to a new local roadway which will connect to the Mead Street extension south of S.H. 66. If this roadway extension is not constructed, then access to the site will be provided by a temporary full movement driveway onto S.H. 66 approximately 250' west of the Mead StreeUS.H. 66 intersection. CDOT will need to be a player in this (the report indicates that they all ready are). 3) The temporary access point onto S.H. 66 and the ultimate Mead Street access intersection onto SH 66 will require a 500' westbound left turn lane and a 500' eastbound right turn lane be installed. The consultant should verify that both lanes can be constructed without conflicting with either the existi�g I-25 interchange/frontage roads to the west and the existing eastbound left turn lane at the Mead StreeUS.H. 66 intersection to the east. Also, a redistribution of trips (number 1 above) may change the final recommendations per the State Hiphwav Access Code. 4) The future year analysis assumes that the Mead StreeUS.H. 66 intersection will operate as a full movement access. The I-25/S.H. 66 Frontaae Road EA. November 2005 concluded that the Mead StreeUS.H. 66 intersection will function as three-quarter movement access once a connection to WCR 9.5 is established. The analysis in the report should reflect the updated access configuration. Also, the applicant should be made aware that the Mead Street intersection will not be left as a full-movement intersection in the future. WCR 9.5 will serve as the area's full movement intersection onto SH 66 once the frontage road is shifted over to this roadway. 5) The background traffic volumes were determined using CDOT growth factor percentages. The background volumes assumed for the 2025 horizon seem low for both the AM and PM peak hours. Recent studies including the I-25/S.H. 66 .-� "� Frontaqe Road EA. November 2005 and the St. Vrain l.akes TIS. December 2005 Uodate include traffic volume projections for the 2025 horizon year which are higher. The background traffic volumes in the Kum & Go report should reflect projections in these other studies. It would seem to make sense for a revised traffic study on this. Also, the latest activity relative to the Frontage RoadIWCR 9.5 may come into play here. It sounds like this improvement could happen sooner rather than later which would have an impact on the study assumptions. Let us know if you need any other information. Chris Fasching, And Jeremy Hahn, P.E., PTOE Transportation Engineer Felsburg Holt & Ullevig 6300 S. Syrecuse Way, Suite 600 Centennial, CO 80111 303-721-1440 303-721-0832 (fax) "" r a ;� � � MEMORANDUM TO: Drew Scheltinga, P.E., Public Works Department DATE: 27-March-2006 W��i FROM: Brian Varrella, P.E , Public Works Department COLORADO SUBJECT: Kum& Go #913 (SPR-394) Weld County Public Works Department has reviewed this Site Plan Review request. Comments made during this phase of the review process may not be all-inclusive, as other concerns or issues may arise during the remaining application process. Comments ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... ❑ These drainage plan comments apply to Kum&Go#913 (SPR-394), located on Lot 1 of Lyons 66 Pacific Commerce Park on the southeast quadrant of I-25 at SH 66. ❑ These comments are a result of the review of the drainage report dated January 19,2006, and received by Public Works on February 21, 2006. The drainage report was prepared by Northem Engineering Services, Inc. and stamped by Roger Curtiss,PE#27362. Draina�e Comments: ❑ Please revise the page with the PE stamp and certification statement to show the same written State of Colorado PE number as the stamp number. ❑ Please add a note to the drainage plan sheet indicating that it conforms to the Lyons 66 Pacific Commerce Park drainage plan prepared by Swifr and Associates, approved June 27,2005, and stamped by 7ohn L Kinsfather. ❑ Has the proposed detention facility been conshucted yet? If it has not,then the volume that will be occupied by storm flow contributions from Kum& Go #913 must be available for detention before the project can be consiructed. ❑ The applicant must design and construct a connection to the proposed Lyons 66 Pacific Commerce Park regional detention facility so that it may receive runoff associated with the proposed Kum& Go #913 development during and after construction. o Drainage Report Comments: o Offsite contributions from the east and north must be managed through the Kum&Go�913 site and addressed in the text of the report. o Page 2, 2°°Paragraph—the text identifies soil on site as hydrologic soil group B. However, the rationa] method calculations for the composite runoff coefficients have type C values for Basin A1, and type B values for Basin A2. Please correct ihe text to report the conect soil type, either B or C(or a combination), and justify using appropriate resources. Please correct the calculation sheet(s)in the appendix using the appropriate UD&FCD runoff coefficients for the soil type(s) selected in text. o Please correct numerica1 ettors in the appendix (see attached redlined report). '�#►�ap��3C��sh�1l�dtllress t#�e�opn `erp�s��d ab4ve��N t�e�p�c8��s��Q�'��rcvievv proeess�ate�+ �re"�'e'��evr prk��c��ti�ant��e�anly wh�n i p��r��ir��f��i�ni�ts�a��h�n,��bm�₹�� Au��s�ue�a�eu�i�er�a m�t 6a ° �r�s�al�'e�t'.v��#M�e T�i�t�c #�na�sC�epa�e��.�p�or$o re��rxd#�g t�e�Ieote�rr.t'�vr�e an�l�,�r'r�p�+r�s�- � ' �PQ SPR-394,Kum&Go#913 Email&Original: Planner PC by Post Applicant PC by Post: Fngineer _._.__._._:_..,_.._,,...�._._.,__. Page 1 of 1 .-, ^ Weld County Planning Depsrtment SQU7H�FCT fiUILDING APR 4 Z006 a MEMORANDUI�.��ED � � � TO: KIM OGLE, PLANNING SERVICES FROM: CHARI,OTTE DAVIS, ENVIItONMENTAL HEALTH C• DATE:CT:O R8 2006 �& GO STORE #913 C/O JIM BIRDSALL C�� COLORADO cc: Environmental Health Services has reviewed this proposal for a convenience store/gas station. We have no objections to the proposal, however, we do recommend that the following conditions be part of any approval: We recommend that the following requirements be met prior to allowing the plat to be recorded: 1. The applicant shall submit evidence of an Air Pollution Emission Notice (A.P.E.N.) and Emissions Permit application from the Air Pollution Control Division (APCD), Colorado Department of Health and Environment. Alternately, the applicant can provide evidence from the APCD that they are not subject to these requirements. 2. The applicant shall submit evidence of an Underground Storage Tank permit from the Colorado Department of Labor and Employment (CDL&E), Oil Inspection Section for any storage tanks located on the site. Alternately, the applicant can provide evidence from the (CDL&E), Oil Inspection Section that they are not subject to these requirements. 3. The applicant shall submit a waste handling plan, for approval, to the Environmental Health Services Division of the Weld County Department of Public Health & Environment. The plan shall include at a minimum, the following: 1) A list of wastes which are expected to be generated on site (this should include expected volumes and types of waste generated). 2) A list of the type and volume of chemicals expected to be stored on site. 3) The waste handler and facility where the waste will be disposed (including the facility name, address, and phone number). .- --. We recommend that the following requirements be incorporated into the permit as conditions that must be met prior to operation: 1 . A stormwater discharge permit may be required for a developmenUredevelopmenUconstruction site where a contiguous or non- contiguous land disturbance is greater than or equal to one acre in area. The applicant shall inquire with the Water Quality Control Division (WQCD) of the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment at www.cdphe.state.co.us/wq/PermitsUnit if they are required to obtain a stormwater discharge permit. Alternately, the applicant can provide evidence from WQCD that they are not subject to these requirements. 2. The applicant shall submit evidence of a Retail Food Establishment License from the Consumer Protection Division of the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment. We recommend that the following requirements be incorporated into the permit as development standards: 1. All liquid and solid wastes (as defined in the Solid Wastes Disposal Sites and Facilities Act, 30-20-100.5, C.R.S., as amended) shall be stored and removed for final disposal in a manner that protects against surFace and groundwater contamination. 2. No permanent disposal of wastes shall be permitted at this site. This is not meant to include those wastes specifically excluded from the definition of a solid waste in the Solid Wastes Disposal Sites and Facilities Act, 30-20-100.5, C.R.S., as amended. 3. Waste materials shall be handled, stored, and disposed in a manner that controls fugitive dust, fugitive particulate emissions, blowing debris, and other potential nuisance conditions. 4. The applicant shall operate in accordance with the approved "waste handling plan". 5. The applicant shall comply with all provisions of the Underground and Above Ground Storage Tank Regulations (7 CCR 1101-14). 6. Fugitive dust and fugitive particulate emissions shall be controlled on this site. 2 .-. ^ 7. This facility shall adhere to the maximum permissible noise levels allowed in the Commercial Zone as delineated in 25-12-103 C.R.S., as amended. 8. Adequate handwashing and toilet facilities shall be provided for employees and patrons of the facility. 9. The facility shall utilize the existing municipal sewage treatment system. (St. Vrain Sanitation District) 10.The facility shall utilize the existing public water supply. (Little Thompson Water District) 11.A11 potentially hazardous chemicals must be stored and handled in a safe manner in accordance with product labeling and in a manner that minimizes the release of hazardous air pollutants (HAP's) and volatile organic compounds (VOC's). 12.The applicant shall comply with Colorado Retail Food Establishment Rules and Regulations governing the regulation of food service establishments. 13.The operation shall comply with all applicable rules and regulations of the State and Federal agencies and the Weld County Code. 3 NORTHERN ADDRESS: PHONE: 970221.4158 200 S.College Ave. Suite 100 WEBSITE: E N G I N E E R I N G Fort Collins,C080524 fAX:970.221.4159 w�vw.northemengineering.com November 2, 2006 Mc Kim Ogle Planning Manager 918 Tenth Street Greeley, CO 80631 RE: Site Plan Review 394 (SPR-394) Kum & Go#913 at Lyons 66 Paci�c Commerce Park We have reviewed the Site Plan Review comments (SPR-394) from Weld County for the proposed gas station/convenience store at Lot 1 Block 1 Lyons 66 Pacific Commerce Park. The site plan review is shown as approved with conditions, please read below far the comments and our responses. From the Site Plan Administrntive Review comments, conditionally approved by Kim Ogle, Apri117, 2006: 1. Prior to the recording of the Site Plan Review plat, the appGcant shall addcess the folbwing: The plat fox Pacific Commerce Park was recorded iune 2G, 2006; comments pertaining to the dcaelopment plans fox Lot 1 �vill bc addxessed with this resubmittal. A. The applicant shall address the concerns of the Department of Public Works specific to the drainage for this site...The applicant shall addcess the existing lack of detention... �1n agreement has been xeached behveen the developer of Lot 1 and the o�vner of the Lyons 66 Paciflc Commexce Paxk; this agteement assigns the construction of the drainage detennon faciliues, along with utilities and tempoxary access to the ownex. ImpTovements will be completed pxior to compledon of construcrion of Lot 1. B. The appficant shall address the concems...specific to the access, including the temporary access easement... A revised"I'raffic Study, dated May 2006, has been submitted to address the inival concexns from the oxiginal TIS. We have submitted access permit applications fox the temporacy access to CDO1';we andcipate obtaining the perrruts within the next month. C. The applicant shall attempt to address the concerns/requirements of the Mountain View Fire Protection district... The concems of the Fue District are addressed in more detail on page 5 of this response lettet. � ;tt D. The applicant shall complete all proposed improvements including those regarding landscaping, screening, access improvements and parking lot requirements... All improvements shall be installed, with tbe esception of the landscaping that will be needed�vith the removal of the tempoxaiy access. A letter of cxedit is being drafted to addxess thc issuc. E. The applicant shall submit a waste handling plan...which will include the following: 1. A list of wastes which are expected to be genecated on site... 2. A list of the type and volume of chemicals expected to be stored on site. 3. The waste handler and facility where the waste will be disposed... Please see the waste handling plan attached to these xesponses. F. The applicant shall submit evidence of an APEN... A copy of the APEN application has been attached to this submittal. G. The applicant shall submit evidence of an Underground Storage Tank permit... The applicant's Underground Storage Tank Permit is in the wocks, expected to be oUtained before the end of the month. H. The applicant is proposing one monument sign for this faciliry... Please see the sign detail included with this submittal. I. The applicant shall attempt to addcess the concerns of the Town of Mead specific to the annexation petition. '11ie"I'own of Mead will not be annexing the subdivision. J. The applicant shall address the concerns of the Department of Building Inspection. .111 concerns shall be addtessed. K. The Improvements agreemeny the Covenants and the Final Plat for the Lyons 66 Pacific Commerce Park shall be recorded... The final plat has been xecoxded, the othex xequired documents �vill be recozded pxior to this Site Plan Review being xecoxded. 2. The plat shall be amended to delineate the following: A. The requitements of the ADA. ADA parking spaces... B. The off-street loading area for the faciliry. C. The right-of-way for Pacific Circle and East Interstate I-25 Road shall be dimensianed... D. Telephone,Natural Gas and Electcic Service shall be delineated in accordance with... ■� ., . E. Section 23-2-160.R.6 of the WCC requices a minimum 40 foot flace radii... F. Sheet G1 contains SWPP notes; therefore, note 3 on sheet 1 that refers to the Town of Wellington Erosion Control standards shall be eliminated. G. The applicant shall include on the Landscape Plan in accordance with... i. Section 26.2.70.B.G states "fescue, brome/fescue... ii. Section 26.2.')0.C.2 states that berming... iii. Section 26.2.70.C.4 states "at least 10% of the area of a parking lot must be landscaped... iv. Section 2G.2.70.D.2.b states "that portion of a lot in any zone district which abuts a public oc private road... v. Section 26.2.70.D.2.d states "a minimum landscape setback along State Highway 119 and theic subsequent frontage roads shall be 50'... vi. The installation schedule shall specify when the landscaping will be installed on site. vii. A landscape maintenance schedule which specifically states who will... viii. The method of native gcass planting shall be called out as... ix. A Noxious Weed Control Plan shall be developed and approved... x. On site Gghting, either dicect illumination oc indirect... "The plat for Lyons 66 Pacific Commerce Paxk was cecoxded June 2Q 200G. The comments psovided above were incocporated into the construcdon and landscape dTawings. 3. The following notes shall be placed on the plat: A. In accordance with the WCC, no land... B. The application may in the future... C. t1ll flquid and solid wastes... D. No permanent disposal of wastes... E. Waste materials shall be handled... F. The applicant shall operate... G. The applicant shall comply with... H. Fugitive dust and fugitive pacticulate... I. This facility shall adhere to... J. Adequate handwashing and toilet faciflties... K. Adequate toilet facilities... L. The facility shall utilize the existing... M. The facility shall utilize the existing... N. All potentially hazardous chemicals... O. The operation shall comply with... P. The applicant shall comply with... Q. Apparatus roads shall be designed... R. Effective January 1, 2003, Building Permits... S. Effective August 1, 2005, Building Permits... T. All structures, including signs, on site must... U. Buildings shall conform to the requirements... V. Exterior illumination of structures and lots shall be restricted as follows: i. Sources of light shall be shielded... ii. Neither the direct nor retlected light... W. The facility shall comply with all... � X. The applicant shall submit evidence of a Colorado Discharge Permit System or CDPS permit... Y. Property maintenance. Property located within Commercial Zone Districts... Z. There shall be no staging or paxking of vehicles on Pacific Circle... AA. This site plan review shall comply with the notes listed under the Lyons 66 Commerce... '1'6e plat fot Lyons 66 Pacific Commexce Paxk was recoxded June 20, 2006. The comments provided above wexe incoipoxated into the constmetion and landscape dxa�vings. 4. Prior to the issuance of each building permit: A. The applicant shall submit evidence to the Department of Planning Services... "I'he applicant will comply B. Buildings shall conform to the requirements of the various codes... The buIlding plans shall confoxm to ihe cuxxent edition of each listed code C. <none> D. Buildings shall be designed and constructed in accordance with the provisions... The building plans shall confoxm to the pxovisions within the fire code E. A complete set of building construction plans, including information... A complete set of construction plans will be submitted F. The buildings will require an engineered foundation... The foundation will be engineexed based on thc soils xepoxt. G. The building will probably be classified as a mixed use, Type M... The building is not anticipated to have fire spxinklexs, a fixe hydrant is located appxoximarely 100' fxom the building H. Building height shall be measured in accordance... Please refexence building elevadons fox building height I. A plan review is required for each building which a building permit... Plan xe�new will be submitted when the site plan review is complete �". 5. Upon approval by the Department of Planning services, the Site Plan Review plat shall be prepared... Thc plat has bcen rccorded 6. Prior to Certificate of Occupancy: A. The applicant shall provide written evidence to the Department of Building Inspection... B. The applicant shall provide written evidence from the St. Vrain... C. A final inspection of occupancy will be requiced by a member... D. In accordance with WCC Ordinance 2005-7 approved June 1, 2005... The xequ�ed documents will be pxovided to the Department of Building Inspecdon. In response to a Memorandum dated Mnrch 13, 2006 to Kim Ogle from Drew Scheltinga: Access- The"CIS has been cevised and resubmitted to CDOT. Also submitted to CDOT axe applications fox access pexmits fox the site. Pexrruts are anticipated to be gxanted in a month. Site Plan- The refexence to the Town of Wellington has been omitted; the xadii of the futuce dcive entrances off of Pacific Cirde have been incxeased [0 40'. Secrion 23-2-160 R7 does not refer to dry� utility seroice, but pavement depth. Secrion 23-2-160 W6 refets ro plats. Dtainage- The detention facilities will be constnicted priox ro the completion of construction fox Lot 1 ln response to comments for Mountain View Protection District. • The total building appears to be about 3,350 squace feet... 11 lettex fxom Little Thompson Water District will confum that all requixements have been met prior to ihe issuance oE the Ceruficate of Occupancy • Fire apparatus to the building appears to be adequate... '1'he pavement will be designed to support thc loads of fire appatatus. • The dumpster location appeacs acceptable... The dumpstex is not located beneath a combusdble roof • Building construction Plans and the final site plan... Building plans will be submitted with the approval of this site plan review • A final inspection of the occupancy will be required... The applicant will comply ��:x. ln response to cornments sent by Charlotte Davis to Kim Ogle dated March 28, 2006: Environmental Health has reviewed the proposal ...We have no objections to the proposal, however,we do recommend that the following conditions be part of any approval: We recommend that the following requirements be met prior to allowing the plat to be recorded: 1. The applicant shall submit evidence of an APEN... �1 copy of the APEN applicarion is attached, a copp of ihe permit�vill be submitted when teceived. 2. The applicant shall submit evidence of an Underground Storage Tank... An appGcation fox the permit is being reviewed; ihe pernut is expected ro be obtained by the end o£the month 3. The applicant shall submit a waste handling plan... Please see the waste handling plan attached to these xesponses. We recommend that the following requirements be incorporated into the permit as conditions that must be met prior to operation: 1. A stormwater discharge permit may be required... A copy of the application is included with ihis submittal, a copy of ihe petmit will be submitted when received. 2. The applicant shall submit evidence of a Retail Food Establishment... A corp of ihe I.icense will be submitted within the next two �veeks when obtained. We recommend that the following requirements be incorporated into the permit as development standards: 1. All liquid and solid wastes... 2. No permanent disposal of wastes 3. Waste materials shall be handled... 4. The applicant shall operate in accordance with the approved "waste handling plan". 5. The appficant shall comply with all provisions... 6. Fugitive dust and fugitive particulate emissions... 7. This faciliry shall adhere to the maximum permissible... 8. Adequate handwashing and toilet... 9. The facility shall utiGze the existing municipal... 10. The faciliry shall utilize the existing public... 11. All potentially hazardous chemicals must be stored and handled... � 12. The applicant shall comply with Colorado... 13. The applicant shall comply with all applicable rules... The applicant will adhere and comply �vith the comments above listed, ensucing that all pxovisions are followed. !n response to a Mernorartdum f'rom Brian Varella to Drew Scheltinga, dated March 27, 2006: • Please cevise the page with the PE stamp and certification statement to show... 1'he number has been added • Please add a note to the drainage plan sheet indicating that it conforms to... The note has been added • Has the proposed detention facility been constructed yet? The detention facility�vill be completed priar to the construction of Lot 1 • The appflcant must design and construct a connection to the proposed... "fhe developed drainage�vill bc slowed and spxead out to surface dxain with the rest of the subdivision south to the detendon facility • Drainage report comments: o Offsite contributions from the east and north must be managed... Dcainage fxom the nocth will be intexcepted by landscaping berms along the narth end of the site and direcred ro the west atound the site. Flows Erom the east will eithex ftow onto the site (included in Basin .�2) ar be intexcepted by� landscaping bexms and d�ected axound the site. Both flows from the north and east axe surface flows, not concentxated flows. o Page 2, 2"d pacagraph- the text identifies soil... The soil is Type B, ihe values have been coccected. o Please corcect numerical ercors in the appendix... The exxors have been corrected. . �� /n response to n Memornndum from Drew Schelringa to Curtis Rowe, dated May I5, 2006.• ...We have reviewed the revised study and have no further comments at this time...Weld County will not approve the site plan until CDOT indicates they have come to an agreement with Kum & Go cegarding temporary access and improvements to SH 66... CDOT has indicated acceptancc of the temporary access design; the perrnit applicauons have been submitted and are anticipared to be gxanted this month. Should you have any qucstions about any of these xesponse, please feel fcee to call to discuss 970 22] 4158 ox I can be xeached via email at I�imberl;•n.northexnenginecrin�.com Sincerely, NOR"1'HERN ENGINEERING Kimberl��J. Dall, EI WASTE HANDLING PLAN During construction, the foilowing wastes are anticipated to be generated and managed: Concrete—waste to be placed in clean-out area and removed at job's end. Masonry mortars— waste to be placed in dumpster. It is anticipated that 4 dumpsters, each at 40 CY, will serve the job. If an additional dumpster is needed, it will be provided. After construction, waste generation would indude packaging of products, and other general solid rubbish. This waste will be stored in an enclosed dumpster until the waste handling facility empties the dumpster and hauls the garbage away. Chemicals expected to be on-site include fuels and oils inside equipment, no storage is anticipated. The combined tank volume for the fuels and oils is 52,000 gallons. The waste handler and facility where the waste will be disposed has yet to be determined, however it will be a commercial waste handling faciliry local to the area. i . , �; , , r�'`�. � � � rf �° W � ,; o � w N ,: _ , o � � � N : . ., ., . ;; � Q� i W � �■� e� :� a .� � � a� W � t ;'�k � J � � � �`�, �� z � i ,� , _ � I u � � �I . . _,; ■ t �� _ �!, • • � �i ;� � , �j :` . Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment Page I of 3 Air Pollution Con[rol Division - LAND DEVELOPMENT - Air Pollutant Emission Notice (APEN) - and - Application for Construction Permit � New Facility ❑ Transfer of Ownership * ❑ Change in Production ❑ No Change(APEN Update Only) All sections of this APEN and application mus[be completed prior to submit[al [o [he Division for both new and existing facilities. An application with missing information may be determined incomplete and may result in longer engineer processing times. *No[e: For[ransfer of ownership or company name change of a permi[,you mus[also submit a Construc[ion Permit Application form. Pemtit Number AIRS Number Company Name: Nor[hern Engineering Billing Address: 200 South College Avenue Zip Code: 80524 Fort Collins,CO Person to Contact Kimbedy Dall Phone Number: 970 221 4158 Email Address: kimberly@northernengineering.com Fax Numbec 970 221 4159 Please provide description of the activity: (Also,please provide a site map) To conshuct a convenience srore with gas sales at Lot I of Lyons 66 Pacific Commerce Park Project Name&Location: Kum&Go#913,Mead,CO County: Weld Section: 26 Township: 3 N Range: 68 W To[al area of Iand in project 1.46 Acres Da[e ear[hmoving will— Commence: Jan 2007 Stop: April 2007 Total area subject to ear[hmoving: 1.46 Acres Total disturbed area at any one time: 1.46 Acres Area to be paved (roads,parking lots): 1.07 Acres Date paving will be completed: April 2007 Estimated time to complete entire project(includes buildings) 4 months List any known or suspected contaminates in the soil: None Known Brief description of how the project development will occur(attach an additional page if necessary): The site will be ovedot graded to final elevations for the conshuctiou of the store,carb,gutter,and pavement. Before the commencement of grading,the site shall be pro[ected with erosion control measures as illustra[ed in the construction plans. Landscaping shall be ins[alled and permanen[vegetation es[ablished prior to the removal of[he [emporary erosion control measures. Revised September 2004 http://www.cdphe.state.co.us/ap/stationarv.asp . Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment Page I of 3 Air Pollution Control Division - LAND DEVELOPMENT - Air Pollutant Emission Notice (APEN) - and - Appiication for Construction Permit � New Facility ❑ Transfer of Ownership * ❑ Change in Production ❑ No Chan�e(APEN Update Only) All sec[ions of this APEN and application mus[be comple[ed prior[o submittal to[he Division for bo[h new and existing facili[ies. An application wi[h missing informa[ion may be determined incomplete and may result in longer eugineer processing times. *No[e: For[ransfer of ownership or company name change of a permi[,you must also submit a Cons[ruction Permi[Application form. Pemtit Number AIRS Number Company Name: Northern Engineering Billing Address: 200 South College Avenue Zip Code: 80524 Por[Collins,CO Person to Contact: Kimbedy Dall Phone Number: 970 221 415R Email Address: kimberly@northernengineering.com Fax Number. 970 221 4159 Please provide description of the activity: (Also,please provide a site map) To construc[a convenieuce store with gas sales at Lot 1 of Lyons 66 Pacific Commerce Park Project Name&Loca[ion: Kum&Go#913,Mead,CO County: Weld Section: 26 Township: 3 N Range: 68 W Total area of land in project 1.46 Acres Date earthmoving will— Commence: 7an 2007 S[op: April 2007 Total area subject to earthmoving: 1.46 Acres Total disturbeA area at any one time: I.46 Acres Area to be paved(roads,parking lots): I.07 Acres Date paving will be comple[ed: April 2007 Estimated time to complete en[ire project(includes buildings) 4 months List any known or suspected contaminates in the soil: None Known Brief descrip[ion of how the projec[developmen[will occur(attach an additional page if necessary): The site will be ovedot graded to final elevations for the construction of the store,curb, gutter,and pavemenL Before the commencement of grading,the site shall be protected with erosion con[rol measures as illusUated in the construc[ion plans. Landscaping shall be installed and permanent vegetation established prior[o the removal of the temporary erosion con[rol measures. Revised September 2004 http://www.cdphe.state.co.us/ap/s[ationary.asu � Colorado Departmen[of Public Heal[h and Environmen[ Page 2 of 3 Air Pollution Control Division - LAND DEVELOPMENT - FUGITNE DUST CONTROL PLAN FOR LAND DEVELOPMENT (This mus[lx submitted wifi the Air PolWtant Emission Noticeand-Application for Emission PermiU Regulation No. I requires that a fugi[ive dust control plan be submi[ted by applicants whose source/ac[ivity resul[s in fugi[ive dus[emissions. The conVol plan must enable the soume to minimize emissions of fugitive dust ro a level that is technologically feasible and economically reasonable. If the control plan is not adequa[e in minimizing emissions a revised control plan may be required. The control plan(if acceptable to the Division) will be used for enforcement putposes on the sources. Please check [he dust con[rol measures which you propose for your ac[ivity. The Division will enforce the control measures checked. Use separate sheeGs if more space is needed. Also note items with an asterisk(*). This indicates those measures which will probably be required. I. Con[rol of Unoaved Roads on Si[e ❑ Warering ❑ Frequent(Watering Freqaency of 2 or More Times Per Day) ❑ As Needed ❑ Application of Chemical S[abilizer ❑ Vehicle Speed Control Speeds limited to mph maximum. Speed limit signs must be posted. (Generally 30 mph is maximum approvable speed on site.) ❑ Gravelling II. Control of Dismrbed Surface Areas on Site � Watering ❑ Frequent(Watering Prequency of 2 or More Times Per Day) � As Needed ❑ Application of Chemical Stabilizer ❑ Vehicle Speed Control Speeds Limited To MPH Maximum. Speed Limi[Signs Must Be Pos[ed. ❑ Revegetation Revegetation Must Occur Within One Year Of Soil Disturbance ❑ Seeding with mulch ❑ Seeding without mulch ❑ Furrows at right angle to prevailing wind Depth of furrows Inches(must be greater than 6") ❑ Compac[ion Of Disturbed Soil On A Daily Basis To Wi[hin 90%Of Maximum Compac[ion (As determined by a Procror Test). ❑ Founda[ion areas only;or ❑ All distarbed soil. � Wind Breaks Type: Silt Fence (Example: Snow Fence, Silt Fence,etcJ ❑ Synthetic Or Nataral Cover For Steep Slopes. Type: (Nettiug,Mulching,etcJ Revised Sep[ember 2004 http://www.cdphe.state.co.us/�p/stationary.asu , Colorado Departmen[of Public Heal[h and Environmen[ Air Pollution Control Division - LAND DEVELOPMENT - III. Preven[ion Of Mud And Dirt Carried Out On[o Paved Surfaces. � Prevention � Gravel En[ry Ways ❑ Washing Vehicle Wheels ❑ O[her. ❑ Cleanup of Paved Areas Prequency: Times Per Day ❑ S[reet Sweeper ❑ Hose With Water ❑ Other: Additional Sources of Emissions Lis[any o[her sources of emissions or con[rol methods Wattles are to be installed at the curb openings to prevent sediment from leaving the parking lot. Signature of Legally Authorized Person(not a vendor or consultant) Dafe Name(please print) Title ♦ � Check the appropriate box if you want: ❑ Copy of the Preliminary Matysis conducred by the Division ❑ To review a draft of the permit prior to issuance (Checking any of these boxes may result in an increased fee and/or processing[ime) Send this form along with$I 1996 to: Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment Telephone: (303)692-3150 Air Pollution Control Division APCD-SS-Bl 4300 Cherry Creek Drive South Denver,CO 80246-1530 Small Business Assistance Proeram (303)692-3148 Small Business Ombudsman (303)692-2135 Revised September 2004 http://www.cdohe.staCe.co.us/ap/stationary asQ STATE OF COLORADO Updated 3/2006 GENERAL PERMIT APPLICATION FORM ONLY AND STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN GUIDANCE FOR STORMWATER DISCHARGES ASSOCIATED WITH CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY ATTENTION This document contains only the two-page application form for the CDPS Stormwater Construction Permit. You must follow the application instructions and the process for developing a Stormwater Management Plan (SWMP). The complete application document is on the Division's web page at: http://www.cdphe.stataco.us/wq/PermitsUniUstormwater/S WConstructionApplica6on.pdf DO NOT SUBMIT YOUR SWMP NEW FOR THIS APPLICATION REFER TO THE COMPLETE APPLICATION AND INSTRUCTION FOR FURTHER INFORMATION • Site Map/Legal Description—A site map or legal description (subdivision/blocWlot) indicating the site boundaries is now required. • Applicant and Operator Liability—An applicant under this permit agrees to assume liabiliry for compliance with the requirements of the Construction General Permit for the entiretv of the construction site/project described and applied for, until such time as the applicant takes the necessary actions to amend, transfer, c�r inactivate Iheir certification, or[he permit expires. The Application Certification language has been revised to clarify this requirement. It is [he applicant's responsibility to be familiar with the requiremen[s of the permit and ensure compliance with those requirements. • Restrictions on Who May Apply for and Maintain the Permit—The applicant mus[be either the owner and/or operator of the construction site. An operator at a construction site who is no[covered by a certification held by an appropriate entity may be held liable for operating without the necessary permit coverage. Refer to Parts B and C of the Instruc[ions. • Stormwater Management Plan Guidance—The guidance which was previously available as a separate document has now been added as Appendix A to the application. The guidance has been revised and upda[ed. Additional Guidance Additional information, including further discussion on permi[tee and operator IiabiliCy, is available in [he Stormwa[er Fact Sheet for Construction, available from the Division's web site a[ www.cdphe.state.co.us/wq/PermitsUniU. If you have questions on completing this application, you may contact the Division at cdphe.wqstorm@state.co.us or(303)692-3517. ApplicaHon Completeness: All items of the application must be completed accuratelv and in Iheir entire[v or Ihe applica[ion will be deemed incomplete, and processing of the application will not begin until all information is received. (Do not include a copy of[he Stormwater Management Plan, unless requested by the Divisioa) One ori inal copy of the completed application (no faxes or e-mails) shall be submitted, only to: Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment Water Quality Control Division WQCD-Permits-B2 4300 Cherry Creek Drive South Denver,Colorado 80246-1530 3/06/Cons[ i GENERAL PERMIT APPLICATION For Agency Use Oniy STORMWATERDISCHARGES ASSOCIATED WITH: o�i�aeo��-ta __i i __ CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY "^^^'" °°, `�°� COR - 03 vcrmiiNo.<coa-o3oo00) BillingCode: 9A 9B 9C(I) 9D(2) 9E(3) 9F(4) ALL APPLICANTS MUST FOLLOW THE DIRECTIONS FOR COMPLETION OF THIS FORM IN PART D OF THE INSTRUCTIONS Please print or type. All items mus[be completed accurately and in their en[irety or the application will be deemed incomplete and the application remrned. Processing of[he application will not begin until all information is received. Please refer to the instructions for informa[ion about the required items. Original signatures for Parts 8 and 9 are required. I. Name and address of the permit applicant Company Name Kum &Go, LC Mailing Address 6400 Westown Parkway City, State and Zip Code West Des Moines, IA 50266 Phone Number ( 515 )457 6121 Who is applying? Owner ❑ Develope� Contractor ❑ Local Contact(familiar with facility) Kimbedy Dall, Northern Engineering Title Proiect Eneineer Phone Number (970) 221 4158 Local Contact E-mail Address Kimberly@northernengineering.com Legally Responsible Person (applica[ion signer)E-mail Address 2. Location of the construcfion site: Street Address(or cross streets) Southwest corner of Hwy 66 and Mead Sireet City(if unincorporated, so indicate) unicorporated County Weld Name of plan, project, or development Kum & Go#913 Latitude/Longitude—use one of the following formats: Lati[ude _ / / _ _ _Longitude _ _ _ /_ _ /_ _ _(e.g., 39°42'll", 104°SY57") degrees minu[es seconds deerees minutes seconds -or- Latiwde 4 0 . 2 3 3 Longitude 1 0 4 . 9 7 6 (e.g., 39.703°, 104.933°') degrees([0 3 decimal places) degrees(ro 3 decimal plaees) 3. Legal Description (subdivisian,block,and lot)or Map Indicating Site Location/Boundaries: If a map is attached to provide this information, this must be indicated below. Maps mus[be folded to 8'/z x I I inches. Map Attached? �Yes, skip to item 4 - No; include legal description per Instructions(use separate sheet if needed): Subdivision(s), Lot(s), Block(s): 4. Area of the construction site: Total area of project site(acres) 1.46 Area of project site to undergo disWrbance (acres) 1.46 Total disturbed area of Larger Common Plan of Development or Sale, if applicable (i.e., total including all phases, fi(ings, lots, and infrastructure oot covered by this application, SEE INSTRUCTIONS!) I 4fi acrrc 3/06/Const ii 5. Nature of the wnstruction activity: Check the appropriate box(s)or provide a brief description that indicates the general namre of the construction activities. (The full description of activities must be included in the Stormwater Management Plan.) L!Single Family Residential Development �I Multi-Family Residential Development �Commercial Development I�Oil and Gas Production and/or Exploration(including pad sites and associated infrastructure) f 'Highway/Road Development(not including roadways associated with commercial or residential development) i I Other, Describe: 6. Anticipated wnstruction schedule: (SEE INSTRUCTIONS! Providing incorrec[ information may resul[ in viola[ions.) Cons[ruction Start Date: 0 1 / 0 I / 2 0 0 7 Final Stabilization Da[e: 0 5 / 0 I / 2 0 0 7 mon[h day year month day year 7. The name of the receiving waters(s). (If discharge is [o a di[ch or storm sewer, also include[he name of[he ultimate receiving water): Lyons 66 Pacific Commerce Park Deten[ion Pond STOP! A Stormwater Management Plan (see Appendix A) must be completed prior to signing the following certifications! 8. Stormwater Management Plan Certitication: "I certify under penalty of law that a complete Stormwater Management Plan,as described in Appendix A of this applicatian,has been prepared for my activity. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the Stormwater Management Plan is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for falsely certifying the completion of said SWMP, including the possibility of fine and imprisonment for knowing violations." Signature of Legally Responsible Person (submission must include original signature) Date Signed Name(printed) Title 9. Signature of Applicant "I certify under penalty of law that I have personally examined and am familiar with the i�formation submitted in this application and all attachments and that, based on my inquiry of those individuals immediately responsible for obtaining the information, I believe that the information is true, accurate and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fine or imprisonment. "I understand that submittal of this appiication is for coverage under the State of Colorado General Permit for Stormwater Discharges Associated with Construction Activity for the entirety of the construction site/project described and applied for,until such time as the application is amended or the certitication is transferred, inactivated,or expired." Signature of Legally Responsible Person (submission must include original signature) Date Signed Name (printed) Title 3/06/Cons[ A_� . . . . � ., . ..,. . . .: _ .;'�' � i� l i J% CA 0G�2(05121X6i �eG4Clrr;er,k21 JF.a� GaL0p,qD0 DEVaAiMEo�r oK v��L�^I Jr4y DENVER C0802r,L4578 14aqI.TH Awp�NVIROkpa�Nt RETAil. PpQD �S'1"ABLISHMENT LICENSE APPLICATION FOR CALENDAR YEAfi �,,y� Yhleappll�tlmwlli6areJactadunlesse!Iquostlonsarefollyansworod,prcperrarc�,ipencoisaneched,andHeellhDepatlmomapprovyl HaalthPepancontNpproval is oEUinotl.The Sta�e may convatl qo��rhack to a ons tiine aloctronic�anking Iransacllon.Your hank eaounl may Oe deqiled as 'l�— serly as the samo tlayraeaivnC by the State,If eonverted,your ehaekwlll not be rewrnad,I/your eheck Is rn�ocled due m Insuf�cleM e!uncollectad(unds,ihc��aD9hrnon�pr gpyepp q' Moko romitteoce payaGla b: WtLU �'UPJ��'cu��'��F°unt direcly/rom your pank eaounf alectronloally, PlIBIIC HEAL7H AND fP�VIR0NMEN'T Typo of pwnaranlp '` _. ❑Individual/lllndivMuef nrsole pmp�iR��p�Xar,��u��/r��e��a enG�satl a�UaN�and provldB s nofadrod co ofon- � ❑Cen o a'lioo nershlp ❑LimIlotl PnrinoahIp�mitatl LIa�IIhy Company ❑LImhed Lia6flh PaAnershl PY '�P�°�ad idantifiwfIonJ °� ❑"S"Cwpore;bn ❑qaeociallon y P (aLimiledLlebiliryL7mlteaPaMorship ❑JnintVanmrn ❑7n;yt ❑�.�teta qGovemmenf ��IS/Licnnse to be IseuaC In�he name(s)af(!❑uli l gol nermeool coyorafjonolndd'duelownar oRneme ol�rst poq�e��h N n p fi1 [` / r' _ -�'-�'] �,---� -_` �-. C�__ fnemesolsoconaendendlriunelpennersorrorpaotionorocers) — 7 de Namo —�'--�---�—��— = .:_ x-�'- �,-, � _� FEINNumboqSocielSecu�IlyNuro6a� L'—�Yl � � � J �� . _ _ 9us�ness�outed at pi�.ra.,,.,��ou�o,ary xai..,n�e ziv�ony -�---':._�--L.y l� .5 �/ k''( ! I �� ` � �� i - a-�-� -�� -� Y�� N,�n wh h h nass Is aqunlly lo(atatl �(/c� �.-� Phone Number MBlling Addf666 p/dllreron�!rom localbn Abaw;lnqctlo alrBet,elty�elete,and 21P tatlnj /l`�t ' 'L"'- ��7 �>�.�.,i�`� -r:-m��; . �C' l..t.-�'c ' % --' � Dateyou¢IaneaCusinass f�� J'�� , �"�-�'"� ��' r}F _ . �/-�l ❑If seas`onel,mark each O JAN � ^ `�4'� � huslnossmonlh. ❑FEB ❑PR ❑Jl1NE ❑AUG cpp�P7 ❑N0V � " -� ` � Seasonal Dates o/oparallon:8 In Date �DEC � � End Da(e � -Ar yo��aWa for reportinp Slate sales lax7��Yas ❑ ryo Monlh 00y MonN Day It yss,do yQu hava a pept.W Ro�enue Sqlas Tex n.cwunl Numbur'FLd� yary L+Quo� ❑ No Gamtng7 y� �� r � K ro.elve Ne nama and adaless(aocoun!numher,it poss�6le)ol ih�lndividual or 6r�m res ona ble f r e�mam o�a saWs t x�/ _�Ci��i P P Y -�'tn "—�--- Cob�atlo Sales TaY qcceunt Numbar �'-- Nama any address olprevlouc ovmor — In ronsiUeraikn tpereol,1 da hereby cerGfy that 1�ave mmplietl with alf Irems of saMtafion as Ilsted in tlie Colorado Relall Foai Esrablishment Code,an� IhetlhavecomppeGwl�hellorde�sgivenmebyauthorizetllnspeciorsottheColoradoDepartmentofPubllcHealthandEnvironmentwloraiboatdofheatth. 1 tlo hereCy a3ree tpat in the event�ha�ihe rtems of sanitalion aro not romplled with,I w11i disconttnua sarving tootl unlil such Ijme es raquiramants ara maL SiBnatun �� Pale �� 9 �,ti_, r� ' ��3�� Wealtb Department Use Oniy No(oo Llce�yo(School,ChedtaGle,Penal Ins4WNon,Chmch,OiherJ........................ GrorsN Sbre 20.D01-40,000 Sq Ft,......_........(3280 7501 Aa6teufanl0-t00 5gak�........._..., �IJI73 750)..........., §0 Groce S�ore 40,001-7 , q ........S13A.00 Tem ara /S acielEwnlEstabllshmen.�.�.."...'(�21� 750).......S754.00 Gmcory5tore�ver70,0 O�Sq0Ft.Ft.,.��.�...........(3282 7O)�.......S250�0p .. Moblle UniL............... � . ............ ................ _�3288 750).,...... 5154.00 P N P t_.....,.,.(7287 750)........ 5754.00 Gracory w/DalI0.3,000 Sq Ft..._........................(37BJ 750).......5130,00 Reale�ran�10�.200 Suic.......... 3275 75p �rocary w/Dall3,pp1-10.000 Sq Ft................. 3284 i5a Rastaurent Ovar 200 See�s.............................(a2�5 7saj�.....,.Si e8.00 Grocery w/0eli i0,W7,-20.000 Sq Ft...............,p2e5 750j�......,S240.0o Cvccary Slore 0.3,000 Sq Ft. . pa77 7!0),,,..,,,,,y55 00 Gmcery w/De1120,�07-40,000 Sq F6......,.,_..,, �2g0 750 MoGlle Unit(Propackepetl foods 6roce w)Defl 40,�07- q � 1�•-.��5263.00 ' J...........�,,.......(3292 7501...,.,.,..455.00 `Y 70,o00S Fl._.............(�Y67 1601......,.$900A0 Tempo�ary/Spaual Evnnt Estecllshmanl Grocery wlpeli over 70.000 Sq Ft...,..... (PmPacMageC Foods).................. ........,....(3288 760)........5383.00 G��ry Siao 3,061•10.000 Sq Rl....� ...`(349J �50)......,...555.00 ..,...�... GrocerySbra10,001-2�,0�0SqF1................�(3279750�...,�...57a5.00 (99g) fietaivza Time 0cr .^F, 'G:�0FM _ _ _ _ _ — _ __ N 0 RTH E R N ADDRESS: PHONE: 970.221.4158 200 S.College Ave. Suite 100 WEBSITE: E N G I N E E R I N G fort Collins,CO 80524 FAX: 970.221.4159 WWW northemengineering.com TRANSMITTAL DATE: November 3, 2006 NAME: Kim Ogle COMPANY: Weld Counry ADDRESS: 918 Tenth Street Greeley, CO 80631 PROJECT NAME: Kum & Go #913 PROJECT/BG: 177-001.02 FROM: Kimberly Dall SENT VIA: ❑ Pick up ❑ Mail � Courier ❑ Hand Delivered ❑ Fed Ex ENCLOSED ARE THE FOLLOWING: � Drawings ❑ Shop Drawings ❑ Specs/Project Manual � Reports ❑ Contracts ❑ Redlined Drawings ❑ CDs/DVDs ❑ Other COPIES TITLE SIZE MEDIA SHEETS/SET 1 Redline Drainage Report 5 Noxious Weed Plan 5 Retail Food License ** If enclosures listed above are not received, please notify our office THESE ARE TRANSMITTED: � For Approval ❑ Loan to Us ❑ For Review/Comment � For Your Use ❑ For Your Recard � As Requested ❑ Reviewed REMARKS: These documents should have been included in the FedEx packages, please include these with the rest of the submittal. Please call with any questions or if you require further plans or information. Thank you. SIGNED: N 0 RT H E R N ADDRESS: PH0NE:970.221.4I58 200 S.College Ave. Suite 100 WEBSITE: E N G I N E E R I N G Fort Collins,C0 80524 FAX:970.221.4159 WWW northemengineering.com TRANSMITTAL DATE: November 2, 2006 NAME: Kim Ogle COMPANY: Weld County ��'�� c ' ADDRESS: 918 Tenth Street �� Greeley, CO 80631 PROJECT NAME: Kum & Go #913 PROJECT/BG: 177-001.02 FROM: Kimberly Dall SENT VIA: ❑ Pick up ❑ Mail ❑ Courier ❑ Hand Delivered � Fed Ex ENCLOSED ARE THE FOLLOWING: � Drawings ❑ Shop Drawings ❑ Specs/Project Manual � Reports ❑ Contracts ❑ Redlined Drawings ❑ CDs/DVDs ❑ Other COPIES TITLE SIZE MEDIA SHEETS/SET 1 Redline Drainage Report 5 Final Drainage Report 5 Final Construction Plans 24x36 Bond 5 5 Landscape Plan 24x36 Bond 1 5 Responses to comments 5 APEN Application 5 SWMP Application 5 Sign detail ** If enclosures listed above are not received, please notity our office THESE ARE TRANSMITTED: � For Approval ❑ Loan to Us ❑ For Review/Comment � For Your Use ❑ For Your Record � As Requested ❑ Reviewed REMARKS: Please call with any questions or if you require further plans or information. T ank yo . SIGNED: <- Landowner Management Plan 1. Name Kum & Go L.C. Address 6400 Westown Parkway 50266 City, State and Zip West Des Moines, IA 2. Legal DescriPtion_ Lot 1 Block 1 Lyons 66 Pacific Commerce Park; Part of the NW '/a of Section 26, Section 26, T3N R 68W Weld County, Colorado Parcel Number: 1207-26-000034 3. Brief description of land and current use(s). The parcel is approximately I.3 acres an size, cur-re�itly vacanX and is located adjcicerzt to the southwest corraer of the frontage rond of L-25 mad State Higliway 66. The properX�� is zoned PUD: C-3 & /-1 4. Future plans for the land. The pnrcel is to be developed as a commercial prapertv f'eaturing a Kum & Go Conve�aaence Store nnd Gas Statiori. 5. Description of weed infestatioa (Aiaswer B or C) A. Weed Species. B. Acres Infested. C. Percent Infested Noxioais Weeds on or near the property Canada thistle Mc�sk thistle Fielcl bindweed D. Speci�ic location of infestation(s) on land. (Wetland. along ditch,f'ence line. ete.) 6. Management Plan A. Techniques I will use to keep the noxious weecls from going to seed that will also reduce infestation. These plants wil! be kept from goi�ig to seed duri�i,�� tlae corastructro�z phase. Thev will eit/aer� be removed nxechmiically or spot treated with a Glyphosaze prnduct scich as Rourid-up. After construction conipletion the areas aroimd the facEliry will be landscaped. Appropriare c{temacals, such as Coia�i-ont, will be used to treat ciray esistartg problem still occurri��g. B. Implementation schedule. Spring of 2007. In May the property will be reviewed Any eDiemacal treatments thnt are needecl will be mr�de by tlae end of'May,first half of Jtane. If construction has not yet beg��, culditionc�l chemical treatments wdll be used as needed tliroug/i-out the sunimer and fall. C. Anticipated length of implementation (years). 3 to 5 years, as needed. ,,,�'/ r�7 Landowner Signature �✓y�'T �� •C . Date: ��/ �� ) � � �� - /�/-�l �J`t�'u�-, � , �,�,�. 01 '11/2666 11: 44 3636667991 , BOULDER PAC ^ � . � .-. PAGE 01:02 Boulder Pacific Fatc Sheet To: ��', �'y' L'; �G�n,-�-z y ,�� C�� Date: ///�O � 97d - �L/ � �( 9 a Weld County Planning Department S0UTHWFST BUILDING Frox�� MAY 3 1 2006 Subject: �z�z��"�'3 c�� G� //��.,�, ='��EC�B\f ED �� l�� t'� L.c. � ,��2;� ��.�" i..zr� ��, �•�, ' / � �� .. ,��'a�iiz.v��✓ .�,� Or� Cu� � " �C��i �rn.o ?�i�� r/ylG�� / lG�-� (/J !I! � ' �� ?� ,�G 4�2� �Cj �..?�rrl. 1224 Connmerce Crt.Kd�yette, C�. 80026 ph� (303)9z6-7858 fax: 303-666-7gg1 / ��1��/� � �i'1/�lJ-�� ,� ��-��-�- \ ��- ---- _�� 01/11/2006 11: 44 � 303666^991 _ B0ULDER PAC ,,,� . PAGE 02/02 Transnation Title ItMsur�nce Company COMMITMENT FOR TITI.E IDISi7RANCE SCHEDULE A Commitment No.: 10608657 1. Eff'ective Aate of Commitmem: Fe6ruary 17,20p5,At 7:00 am 2- Policy or Policies to be iasued: Amount Yremium A.. ALTA OWIVERS ppLIG� � �`i'BD STBD Proposed INSURED; Lovdand InWptment Company,a Iimited paHnerahip B ALTA LOAN ppLICl' Proppsed�i5URED: C. ALTA LOA.Pi pOLICY � Proposed BVSfJRED: TAi Informa4ou Servic� $25.00 TOTAL $,�p 3• Tlxe ertato or iutaresc in the land described or referred to.in the Commitment and covered herein is Fa Simple, 4. Title to said estate or interest in said land is at the eff'ective daLe hereofvested jn; Lyoas 66 Pacific,I,LC,a Colorado limited lisbi4ty comp�q ' � Vcating Deed recordetl Marrb 15,2000 at Becoppon No.3755526, � s. Thc land ref�i�ed w in this Couiinimaent is�dexNbeA�as follows: _ _Sce ExlUbft A Attached Issued at Denver,Colorado . . Februazy 25,2005 . �� - Page 2 oP 10 - �'raffic Impact Study - _ SH-66 Kum � Go _ _ _ Prepared for: " Kum & Go, L.C. �Kfmley-Hom and Associates,Inc.2005 " �� Kimley-Horn � — and Associates, Inc. _ .. _ T R A F F I C I M P A C T S T U D Y SH-66 Kum & Go Weld County,Colorado Prepazed for Kum&Go L.C. _ 6400 Westown Parkway West Des Moines,Iowa 50266 _ Prepared by Kimley-Horn and Associates,Inc. 950 Seventeenth Street _ Suite 1050 �, E Denver,Colorado 80202 �� NiE� ., �,. (303) 228-2300 � �'�.o _ (303) 446-8678 FAX ;" ^0355 "'; ��•., 9I12'dj r� oFF�s��NAI+E��\`� July 2005 _ This document, together zoith the concepts and designs yresented herein, as an instrument of sernice, is intended only far the specific purpose and client far which if zuas prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document evithout zuritten authorizarion and adaptation by Kimley-Horn and Associates, _ Inc. shall be without liability to Kimley-Horn attd Associates, Ine. TABLE OF CONTENTS -. TABLE OF CONTENTS................................................................................................................. i APPENDICES ................................................................................................................................i i - LIST OF TABLES..........................................................................................................................ii LISTOF FIGLJRES ........................................................................................................................i i - 1.0 EXECUTNE SUMMARY ...................................................................................................... 1 2.0 INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................................... 5 - 3.0 EXISTING AND FUTiJRE CONDITIONS ............................................................................ 7 3.1 Existing Roadway Network........................................................................................................... 7 — 3.2 Existing Study Area......................................................................................................................... 7 3.3 Existing Traffic Volumes................................................................................................................ 7 " 3.4 Unspecified Development Traffic Growth................................................................................. 10 4.0 PROJECT TRAFFIC CHARACTERISTICS......................................................................... 13 — 4.1 Trip Generation.............................................................................................................................. 13 4.2 Trip Distribution............................................................................................................................ 14 "_ 4.3 Traffic Assignment........................................................................................................................ 14 4.4 Total Background Plus Project Traffic........................................................................................20 5.0 TRAFFIC OPERATIONS ANALYSIS ................................................................................. 23 5.1 Analysis Methodology.................................................................................................................. 23 r 5.2 Key Intersecrion Operational Analysis.......................................................................................24 5.3 Interun Access Along SH-66........................................................................................................ 25 5.4 Auxiliary Lane Recommendations along SH-66....................................................................... 28 6.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS................................................................. 30 Kimley-Horn and Assaciates, Inc. 067951.002 -SH-66 Kum £�Go _ Pagei APPENDICES — Appendix A - Conceptual Site Plan Appendix B-Intersection Count Sheets — Appendix C- CDOT SH-66 Traffic Growth Information Appendix D-Trip Generation Worksheets " Appendix E - HCS Analysis Worksheets Appendix F - Peak Hour Signal Warrant LIST OF TABLES � Table 1 - Kum&Go Project Traffic Generation..................................................................................14 Table 2- Level of Service Definitions................................................................................................... 23 Table 3 -SH-66 &Mead Street LOS Results........................................................................................ 24 Table 4 -SH-66 and Temporary Access LOS Results......................................................................... 26 LIST OF FIGURES Figure1 -Vicuuty Map............................................................................................................................6 Figure 2- Existing Laneage and Control............................................................................................... 8 i Figure 3- Existing Traffic Volumes........................................................................................................ 9 Figure 4-2006 Background Traffic Volumes...................................................................................... ll Figure 5-2025 Background Traffic Volumes...................................................................................... 12 Figure 6- Non Pass-by Trip Distriburion............................................................................................ 15 Figure 7-AM Pass-by Trip Distribution............................................................................................. 16 Figure 8-PM Pass-by Trip Distribution.............................................................................................. 17 Figure 9-Non Pass-by Traffic Assignment........................................................................................ 18 Figure 10-Pass-by Traffic Assignment............................................................................................... 19 Figure 11 - 2006 Background Plus Project Traffic Volumes.............................................................. 21 Figure 12- 2025 Background Plus Project Traffic Volumes.............................................................. 22 Figure 13 - Interim Access Traffic Volumes and Storage Requirements......................................... 27 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 067951.002 -SH-66 Kum fd Go _ Page ii 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY A Kum & Go convenience store and gas station is proposed to be located on the southwest — corner of the State Highway 66 (SH-66) and Mead Street intersecrion in unincorporated Weld County, Colorado. Along project frontage, SH-66 is a Colorado Deparrinent of Transportation — highway categorized as NR-A with a 50 mile per hour speed limit. The project is anticipated to include a gasoline service station with 16 fueling positions and associated convenience market. — It is expected that the project would be completed by the year 2006. Analysis was therefore completed for the 2006 short term horizon as well as the 20251ong-term horizon, as required by ' the Colorado Departrnent of Transpartation(CDOT). — The purpose of this study is to identify traffic generation characteristics, to identify potenHal traffic related 'unpacts on the local street system, and to develop mitigation measures required — for identified impacts with development of the project. CDOT identified the existing intersecrion of SH-66 and Mead Street for evaluation in this study. Primary access to the site is expected to be provided by SH-66. Ultunately, direct access to the — project&om the highway is proposed to be provided by a new north-south roadway that will align with Mead Street. Driveways to the project site are proposed along a new east-west access � street to be constructed approxiinately 200 feet south of SH-66 and directly south of this project. This new east-west roadway will intersect with the extension of Mead Street. In the interun if right-of-way is not made avai]able for this new north-south roadway on the eastem project edge, access to the proposed Kum & Go will be provided via one full movement temporary access along SH-66. This study identifies the location of this access and its impact. The entire development is expected to generate approximately 2,604 daily weekday driveway trips. Of these, 161 trips are expected to occur during the weekday morning peak hour, while 214 trips are expected during the weekday aftemoon peak hour. Since this project is a commercial development, a certain percentage of trips are expected to be pass-by trips. Pass-by trips are those vehicles already on the street network, passing by which will be attracted to the Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 067951.002 -SH-66 Kum &Go _ Page 1 site. Accounting for pass-by trips, approximately 1,302 weekday daily, 61 weekday morning _ peak hour, and 94 weekday afternoon peak hour trips are expected to be generated new to the street network. Distribution of site traffic on the street system was based on the area street system — characterisrics, existing traffic patterns, anticipated sunounding development areas, and the proposed access system for the project. Assigiunent of the project traffic was based upon the — trip generation described previously and the distributions developed. — Based on the analysis presented in this report, Kimley-Horn believes the proposed Kum & Go convenience mazket and gas station will be successfully incorporated into the existing and — future roadway network. The proposed project development and expected traffic volumes resulted in the following recommendations: • According to the Colorado State Highway Access Code far category NR-A roadways with a — 50 mile per hour speed limit, the following apply with regards to auxiliary turn lane requirements at the SH-66/Mead Street intersection with development of the Kum & Go + project and access provided via the new north-south roadway to align with Mead Street: — o A westbound to southbound left turn deceleration lane is recommended based on the projected traffic volume and the highway NR-A classification. The CDOT Access — Code threshold for requiring this left turn lane is 10 vehicles per hour, while the project is anticipated to have 35 vehicles per hour on this movement. This left turn + lane presenfly exists for the access into the commercial development to the east. The code requirement states this left turn lane is to include 50 feet of storage and 500 feet of deceleration length (which includes a 15 to 1 taper). In essence, this lane would need to include a full lane width for 370 feet (50 feet of storage plus 320 feet for deceleraHon) and a 180 foot taper. This existing left turn lane length should be verified and lengthened if necessary to meet the current Code requirements. Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 067951.002 —SH-66 Kum £d Go � Page 2 o An eastbound to southbound right turn decelerarion lane is recommended based on _ the projected traffic volume and the highway NR-A classification. The CDOT Access Code threshold for requiring this lane is 25 vehicles per hour, while the project is _ anticipated to have 68 vehicles per hour on this movement. This right turn lane presently exists for the access into the commercial development to the east. The code � requirement states this right turn lane is to include 500 feet of decelerarion length (which includes a 15 to 1 taper). In essence, this lane would need to include a full — lane width for 320 feet and a 180 foot taper. This existing right tum lane length should be verified and lengthened if necessary to meet the current Code — requirements. — o A northbound to eastbound right tum acceleration lane was not found to be required with development of this project. The CDOT Access Code threshold for — requiring this lane is 50 vehicles per hour, while the project is anticipated to have only 35 vehicles per hour on this movement. o A northbound to westbound left turn acceleration lane is not recommended for this — intersection based both on anticipated traffic volumes and that the median area is already being used as a deceleration lane for left turns onto northbound Mead Street. • In the case that right-of-way is not available for construction of the new north-south — roadway to align with Mead Street, east of this project; temporary access to the highway is proposed. This temporary access is anticipated to allow full turning movements. Based — upon existing left lurn demands to the north on Mead Street,and left tums into the site, it is recommended that this driveway be located a miniinum 250 feet west of the SH-66 and ' Mead Street intersection. It is believed sufficient project frontage exists to meet this spacing requirement. Striping modifications along SH-66 will be necessary to designate a left turn in — to the site if this temporary access is needed. Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 067951.002 —SH-66 Kum f>Go Page 3 • All on-site and off-site signing and striping improvements should be incorporated into the — Civil Drawings, and conform to CDOT standazds, as well as the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices 2003 (MUTCD). a Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 067951.002-SH-66 Kum f>Go _ Page 4 2.0 INTRODUCTION Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. (Kimley-Horn) has prepared this report to document the _ results of a Traffic Impact Study of future traffic conditions associated with a proposed Kum & Go project to be located on the southwest comer of the State Highway 66 (SH-66) and Mead — Street intersecHon in unincorporated Weld County, Colorado. The vicinity map illustrating the project site location is shown in Figure 1. The project is anticipated to include a convenience market and gasoline station with 16 fueling — positions. It is expected that the project would be completed by the yeaz 2006. Analysis was therefore completed for the 2006 short term horizon, as well as the 2025 long-term horizon. The — current site plan illustrating the development and access locations is shown in Appendix A. — The purpose of this study is to identify traffic generation characteristics, identify potential traffic related impacts on the local street system, and to develop mitigation measures required — for identified impacts with development of this project. CDOT identified the existing intersection of SH-66 and Mead Street far evaluarion in this study. Primary access to the site is expected to be provided by SH-66. Ultimately, direct access to the — project from the highway is proposed to be provided by a new north-south roadway that will align with Mead Street. Driveways to the project site are proposed along a new east-west access — street to be constructed approximately 200 feet south of SH-66 and directly south of this project. This new east-west roadway wfll intersect with the extension of Mead Street. In the interim if — right-of-way is not made available for this new north-south roadway on the eastern project edge, access to the proposed Kum & Go will be provided via one full movement temporary — access along SH-66. This study identifies the location of this access and its impact. + Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 067951.002 -SH-66 Kum fa Go Page S �� S i� L $ � � i $j� � N � �(� � �: i � ° ��f V I r �. Z ) . 1 t ¢ �. ' ' u � a � 3�, �, � � ��`�s �` � , � � b g , r,�j' rp :,M.3 `� .� §�� p (§��d • � �-2� . e� .. . . . , i _-7 > +s � t� . :� 1 Sh,-`� ,.�,., � ''� : , � J� � �}�$� �m � ' *;�, � .. . 'v .¢', ' j' �.. z' '`,. ,r� ��. „3 i ! : Y t _l�a. ��+,� t !�, . 1 '�`` � � ,� ;� � 3 � �,� -: _, '� �. � � : � .-d � „ -. ° . _ � _ , �,. � � ., :.... E^a�,�� < ,. _ _ „ _ , �€ t+ � T e � � . � �� ' t ` � �` ��-� {• A 6 �' � r �t � . � *�,„� j�( �a 1 1�n 4 r:� jR i �"�'T."�., '�:a s � � `z:��~ . _ ,. . .,� .:�: `, .....,�. ..i ..� . .... .. . :. � . F ��a, • • : • . . • , . � _, : 3.0 EXISTING AND FUTURE CONDITIONS 3.1 Existing Roadway Network _ The proposed Kum & Go gas station and convenience market in unincorparated Weld County, Colorado is to be located on the southwest comer of the State Highway 66 (SH-66) and Mead — Street intersection. Prunary access to the site is expected to be provided by SH-66. SH-66 provides access to I-25. The State Highway Access Category Schedule categorizes the segment — of SH-66 along project frontage as NR-A. In the site vicinity, SH-66 provides one lane of travel in each d'uection with a 50 mile per hour posted speed limit. Along project frontage, there is a — median along SH-66 separaring eastbound and westbound traffic. The T-intersection of Mead Street with SH-66 operates with tcvo-way stop control along Mead Street. Mead Street is a two- — lane, undivided collector, providing access to several commercial and industrial developments. The intersection lane configurations and control for the study area are shown in Figure 2. 3.2 Existing Sfudy Area — The existing site is comprised of vacant land. The land adjacent to this project along the north side of SH-66 is comprised of various commercial and industrial uses. A John Deer Tractor — Sales business is located directly east of the site. All other surrounding areas consist of primarily vacant land. These land uses are also shown in Figure 2. 3.3 Exisfing Traffic Volumes — Existing peak hour hirnutg movement counts were conducted at the existing study intersection of SH-66 & Mead Street on Wednesday, July 6u, 2005. The counts were conducted during the — AM and PM peak hours of adjacent street iraffic in 15-minute intervals from 7:00 AM to 9:00 AM and 4:00 PM to 6:00 PM on this Wednesday. These turning movement counts are shown in " Figure 3 with count sheets provided in Appendix B. Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 067951.002 -SH-66 Kum £r Go _ Page 7 - �o� NORTH Ni5 66']51 0�'�[ Q O � � U F O �' LL Industrial N N � � d015 � � � t —+� W ` — Industrial Industrial �' � � Vacant Q • Serves as Right Turn Lane � into Commercial Property ' Driveway to the East � "� Commercial i _ SH-66 Commerciol — Vacant i::�aea.�c*��;;;:y ii LOCAII ::�.:f ::�:::::�:.._:�. � V4COf1t VOCOfIt t LEGEND � Study Area Key Intersection sTov Stop Controlled Approach — Existing Roadway ---- Futwe Roadwoy _ SH-66 KUM & GO EXISTING INTERSECTION FIGURE 2 LANES AND CONTROL �^ �er-Ham m,�, �I , and Associates, Inc L?lu� NORTH Nr=_ oe�eei.00z a � o a U Watlr�es0ay,July bih,2005 � AM Peak]:00-8:00; PM Peak 4:30-530 O 4 � m N � � m �55(47) — j � f 397(D7) I� 142(132)� 236(339)� w — w � � a i � a I — SH-66 � :'•��FFOJECT��.:::.:j. :: �LOCRn� ::c`: ::::.::_:�::..::: _ LEGEND � SWdy Area Key Intersection � xx�%X� AM(PMj Peak Hour Traffic Volume — Existlny Roadway --- Future Roadway _ SH-66 KUM & GO 2005 EXISTING FIGURE 3 TRAFFIC VOLUMES - ❑�� KimleyHan o,m= � and Assaciates,Inc 3.4 Unspecified Developmeni Traffic Growfh � According to information provided on the website far the Colorado Deparhnent of Transportation, State Highway 66 carries approximately 12,500 vehicles per day with — approximately nine percent heavy vehicle traffic. The 20-year growth factar along this stretch of the highway, 1.67, equates to an annual growth rate of approximately 2.6 percent. SH-66 — traffic growth information is provided in Appendix C. Addirionally, site traffic volumes were estimated for the vacant land surrounding the site along the south side of SH-66 and were — included in the long term background traffic projections. It was assumed that this land would develop with general office buildings and support retail/restaurant services. Appendix D — contains the trip generation expected from this approximate 25-acre area. Background traffic volumes for 2006 and 2025 are shown in Figures 4 and 5,respectively. Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 067951.002 -SH-66 Kum F�Go Page 10 - �� NORTH ur� uc-_isi.cc_ 0 � o � � r 0 � LL a n " �Sfi(48) � `� F407(284) � � 146(135)� 242(348)-► w � w � � a � n N I �- SH-66 ::_::PR0JECT��::>:": � :: I0CATI ... :::::::�::�::�::: _ LEGEND � Study Area Key In[ersection (— Xxpa) AM(PM) Peok Hour Troffic Volume � — Existing Roodway --- Future Roodway _ SH-66 KUM & GO 2006 BACKGROUND FIGURE 4 TRAFFIC VOLUMES - ❑�� Kim�ey-Han�,�, � and Associates,Inc. - �o�-�- NORTH �vrs oe�e=� o�_� a o n �92(78) � I 1 <-663(462) y �I L�57(10) 237(220)� � ? 7� 39a(566)—) � � � 456(79)� m m^ F w � w � � a � N N � — SH-66 _ :f��aeo,�cr�s>:: tt �xnno :.::. :;::;y::�._:;.' � -- _ � i � � - � - - - , . _ , • � LEGEND � � Study Area Key Intersection - � xxpa) AM(PM) Peok Hour Traffic Volume — — Existing Roadway --- Future Roadway _ SH-66 KUM & GO 2025 BACKGROUND FIGURE 5 TRAFFIC VOLUMES � KmIeY•Han o,� � and Associates,Inc. 4.0 PROJECT TRAFFIC CHARACTERISTICS 4.1 Trip Generation _ Site-generated traffic estimates are determined through a process known as trip generafion. Rates and equations are applied to the proposed land use to estimate traffic generated by the _ development during a specific time interval. The acknowledged source for trip generarion rates is the Trip Generarion Reporti published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE). ITE � has established trip rates in nationwide studies of similar land uses. For this study, Kimley- Horn used the ITE Trip Generation Report average trip rates that apply to Gasoline/Service — Station with Convenience Store (945) for traffic associated with the development. — The entire development is expected to generate approximately 2,604 daIly weekday driveway irips. Of these, 161 trips are expected to occur during the weekday morning peak hour, while -- 214 trips are expected during the weekday afternoon peak hour. Since this project is a commercial development, a certain percentage of trips are expected to be pass-by trips. Pass-by — trips are those vehicles already on the street netcvork, passing by which will be attracted to the site. Accounting for pass-by trips, approximately 1,302 weekday daily, 61 weekday morning — peak hour, and 94 weekday afternoon peak hour trips are expected to be generated new to the street network. Pass-by calculations were based on the procedure and information provided in — the ITE Trip Generation Handbook,June 2004. — Table 1 summarizes the estimated traffic generation for the entire proposed development. The trip generation worksheets are included in Appendix D. These calculations illustrate the — equations used, direcHonal distribution of trips, number of daily trips, and expected pass-by volumes based on the published TTE pass-by rates. 1 InsHtute of TransportaHon Engineers, Trip Generation: An Informa6on Report, Seventh EdiHon, Washington DC,2003. � Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 067951.002 -SH-66 Kum F�Go Page 13 Table 1 -Kum &Go Project Traffic Generation — Vehicles Trips AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour — Daily In Out Total In Out Total Gasoline Service Station with Convenience Store " (16 fueling positions) Non Pass-By 1,302 30 31 61 47 47 94 Pass-By 976 50 50 100 60 60 120 — Total 2,604 80 81 161 107 107 214 _ 4.2 Trip Disiribution Distriburion of site traffic on the street system was based on the area street system _ characteristics, existing traffic pattems, anticipated surrounding development azeas, and the proposed access system for the project. The directional distribution of traffic is a means to � quantify the percentage of site-generated traffic that approaches the site from a given d'uection and departs the site in the same direction. Figure 6 illustrates the expected project non pass-by _ trip distribution for the site. Figures 7 and 8 illustrate the expected AM and PM pass-by distriburions for the site, respecrively. Pass-by distributions were prepazed separately for the _ AM and PM peak hours based upon the existing traffic patterns passing-by the site along SH- 66. 4.3 Traffic Assignment _ Traffic assigrunent was obtained by applying the distributions to the estimated traffic generation of the development shown in Table 1. Non pass-by and pass-by traffic assignments _ aze illustrated in Figures 9 and 10, respectively. Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 067951.002 -SH-66 Kum £�Go Page 14 �00 NORTH MS O6]351.G02 o � I I 1 F � IL �Y �I �107 � 1 � I 80%-y t� t` t` o� o 0 F ,." w — w � � a i � N O� � I 80� , �� SH-66 � :�! PRO.£Ci��;'y:�. ;:��aan ::o:. ::::�:;:;�.;::�.' � � I _ I ,' � � � ' � ,' ' _ LEGEND � Study Area K'.ey Intersection �xX%(XX/) Entering (Exitinq) Percentoge o( Vehicles — Existing Roacway ---- Future Roodway SH-66 KUM & GO FIGURE 6 NON PASS-BY TRIP DISTRIBUTION �^ ICmley-Han m,�, �I , and Associates,Inc. - �o� N O RTH pi5 n6'95i.on_ � I I f F � IL �Y �I �60% � � � � 407� n o �o a � �- — w � N a � n N � 60� � — � �_ss �6�� —� 4�7 4�% � :�:� PROJECT��::::;;. ':�� ::��LOCAT c?� :��'�.��::::� ' _ r i _ � ,� � _ _ _ - _ ,- � � LEGEND � Study Areo Key Interrection �XX%(Xx�) Entering (Exi[ing) Percentoge of Vehides — Existing Roadway --- Future Roadwoy SH-66 KUM & GO FIGURE 7 AM PASS-BY TRIP DISTRIBUTION � w�er-Han o,�, ��and Associates,Inc ' ��o� NORTH Ili5 Ofi?551.G��'L r` I I I F IC y 1 �50% � � � � 50%�j N a` � � w � w � � a � n N _ � ;50% SH-66 E50% 50� 50% '�'> PROJECT�::.k}. � ::::IOCATI P::i �::�:�:.��:.:::�'� / - � i _ � ,� �. _ _ _ - _ , , , _ �E�EN� � Study Area Key Intersection �Xx%(XX%) Entering (Exiling� Percentage of Vehlcles " — Existing Roadwoy --- Future Roadway SH-66 KUM & GO FIGURE 8 PM PASS-BY TRIP DISTRIBUTION - ❑�� Kmley-Han o,�, � end Associates,Inc. ^ �o� NORTH Nrs oe�9s euz � F �1 J. � �3�s� � '�Tl' �<t38�� w _ w � � < � N N � .— SH-66 jj PROJECi��jj_!j. � :i�::�LOCATI _..: '::'':�:'::�:::.::. � - � i � � - �. - - _ , . _ , , , ,� LEGEND � Study Area Key Intersection E— Xx(XX) AM(PM) Peok Hour Troffic Volume � — Existing Roodway ---- Fulure Roodway — SH-66 KUM & GO FIGURE 9 NON PASS-BY TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENT �^ ��Y-H�,o,00, �/ , and Aasociates,Inc - Do� NORTH ri.� co-»,.oaz � E--30�-3�) � � � �30(30) -20(-30)--) � � � 20(30)� o 0 F o w � w � N a i N N � — SH-66 � `: PROJECT�.4:.: ..�.:LOCATIO 'r:.�: :;!:;::'::��.:_.:. ' _ r i _ � ,� � _ _ _ - _ , . , _ LEGEND � Study Areo Key Intersection � XX(XX) AM(PM) Peak Hour Troffic Volume — — Existing Roodway --- Future Roadwoy SH-66 KUM & GO FIGURE 10 PASS-BY TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENT - ❑�� KiMey-Han�,�, � and Associates,Inc. 4.4 Total Background Plus ProjecT Traffic , Site traffic volumes were added to the background volumes to represent estimated traffic conditions for the short term 2006 horizon and long term 2025 horizon. These total traffic _ volumes are illusirated for the 2006 and 2025 horizon years in Figures 11 and 12, respectively. Kimley-Harn and Associates, Inc. 067951.002 -SH-66 Kum £�Go Page 20 �o�l NORTH n�rs c;-_''.'.,__ ¢ ._ o rc � r 0 _ a � " �56(48) � � � f 377(254j �33(35) 145(135)� � R� T � 222(318)—� � I I 44(68)� v � �N w — w � � a � � N I — SH-66 .� '!��PROJECT�::_i:S � :�� :�: �LOCATIO ::'r:: :�:�:�::�::.:� _ LEGEND � Study Areo Key In[ersection F— xx(zX) AM(PM) peak Hour Troffic Volume — Exlsting Roadway ---- Future Roadwav _ SH-66 KUM & GO 2006 BACKGROUND PLUS FIGURE 11 PROJECT TRAFFIC VOLUMES �^ �,�Y-H«�m,�, �I , and Associates,Inc. �O� NORTH Nrs oe-ea�.ao�_ m o p �92(78) � I I <-633(432) `�' 1 �90(45) 23?(220)� � T 7� 3��(536)� � I I soo(ia�)� m � �a w � w � � a � n N I — SH-66 � :i GftOJECi��:91i1. �� £��LWATO �:::6: ?£c:��..:-. � � I � I ,' � � � � � � / , I _ LEGEND � S[udy Areo Key Intersection � XXpOO AM(PM) Peak Hour Traffic Volume � � — Existing Roadway --- Future Roadway _ SH-66 KUM & GO 2025 BACKGROUND PLUS FIGURE 12 PROJECT TRAFFIC VOLUMES �^ �ev-Han�_�, �I \ and Associates,Inc 5.0 TRAFFIC OPERATIONS ANALYSIS Kimley-Hom's analysis of traffic operaHons in the site vicinity was conducted to determine _ potenrial capacity deficiencies in the 2006 and 2025 development horizons at the identified key intersections. The acknowledged source for determining overall capacity is the current edition .-. of the Highway Capacity Manualz. — 5.1 Analysis Mefhodology Capacity analysis results are listed in terms of Level of Service (LOS). LOS is a qualitative term — describing operating conditions a driver will experience while traveling on a parricular street or highway during a specific time intervaL It ranges from A (very little delay) to F (long delays — and congestion). For intersections and roadways in this study area, Kimley-Horn recommends intersection LOS D as the minimum threshold for acceptable operarions. Table 2 shows the — defuution of level of service for signalized and unsignalized intersecrions. � Table 2-Level of Service Definitions — Level of Signalized Intersection Unsignalized Intersection Service Average Total Delay Average Total Delay se veh sec/veh _ A ≤10 ≤]0 B >10 and ≤20 >10 and ≤ 15 C >20 and ≤35 >15 and ≤25 _ D >35 and ≤55 >25 and ≤35 E >55 and ≤80 >35 and ≤50 F >80 >50 Definitions provided from the Highway Capacity Manual,Special Report 209,Transportation Research Board,2000. Study area intersecrions were analyzed based on average total delay analysis for signalized and _ unsignalized intersecHons. Under the unsignalized analysis, the level of service (LOS) for a z Transportation Research Board,Highway Capacity Manual,Special Report 209,Washington DC,2000. � Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 067951.002 -SH-66 Kum Fd Go Page 23 two-way stop controlled intersection is determined by the computed or measured control delay � and is defined for each minor movement. Level of service for a two-way stop-controlled intersection is not defined for the intersection as a whole. Level of service for a signalized and _ four-way stop controlled intersecrion is defined for each approach and for the intersection. " 5.2 Key Intersection Operational Analysis Calculations for the level of service at the key intersection of SH-66 with Mead Street are — provided in Appendix E. The existing year analyses are based on the lane geometry and intersection control shown in Figure 2. All future signalized intersecrion analysis utilizes ` optimized cycle lengths unless mentioned otherwise. Level of service for signalized and unsignalized intersections was calculated using HCS analysis software. SH-66&Mead Street This existing T-intersection of SH-66 with Mead Street operates with two-way stop control along Mead Street. As such, all movements at the intersection operate acceptably during both AM and PM peak hours. In 2006, all movements at this intersection are expected to continue to operate acceptably at LOS D or better during both AM and PM peak hours,with or without the addirion of project traffic. By 2025 prior to the addition of project traffic, the intersection is anticipated to meet peak hour signal warrants. A peak hour warrant figure illustrating these ^ volumes is attached in Appendix F. The minor street volumes do not include right tuming vehicles. Therefore,it is anticipated that this intersection would be signalized sometime prior to 2025. With signalization in the long-term 2025 analysis year, this intersection is expected to operate acceptably (LOS D or better) during both the AM and PM peak hours, with or without the addition of project traffic Table 3 provides the results of the level of service at this intersection. ' Table 3 - SH-66 &Mead Street LOS Results AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour _ Delay LOS Delay LOS Scenario sec/veh (sec/veh) Kimley-Horn and Assaciates, Inc. 067951.002-SH-66 Kum £d Go Page 24 2005 Existing TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL — Eastbound Left 8.7 A 5.3 A Southbaund Left 151 C 16A C Southbound Ri ht 11.8 B 11.5 B _ 2006 Background TWO-WAYSTOPCONTROL Eastbound Left 5.8 A 8.4 A _ Southbound Left 15.4 C 16.3 C Southbound Ri ht 11.9 B 11.7 B 2006 Total TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL — Eastbound Left 8.7 A 8.3 A Westbound Left 7.8 A 8.2 A Northbound Through/Left 27.3 D 32.8 D — Northbound Through/Right 9.5 A 10.4 B Southbound Through/Left 18.4 C 21.4 C Southbound Ri ht 11.6 B 11.3 B _ 2025 Background SIGNALIZED 16.8 B 34.3 C 2025 Total SIGNALIZED 18.2 B 38.1 D Based on the results of the analysis through this key intersection, no unprovements have been � recommended to accommodate the addition of project traffic. 5.3 InTerim Access Along SH-66 It is possible that when the Kum&Go is set to open,the proposed north-south roadway to align with Mead Street will not yet be in place due to right-of-way issues. Therefore, CDOT has agreed to allow a temporary full movement SH-66 access to the project. It is recommended that this temporary access be constructed to provide maxunum back-to-back storage for westbound to southbound left turning vehicles entering the site and eastbound to northbound left tuming vehicles traveling north along Mead Street. The storage demand for westbound to southbound left turning vehicles is 50 feet and the storage demand for eastbound to northbound left turning vehicles is 150 feet, based upon the CDOT calculation of 1 foot per vehicle (rounded to the nearest 50 feet). Since the site frontage is approximately 275 feet, a driveway located on the western edge of the property would allow for an approximate 75 foot taper between these tcvo left tum lanes along the highway. To provide a minimum taper of 50 feet, this temporary access should be located a ininimum 250 feet west of the SH-66 and Mead Street intersection. Striping Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 067951.002 -SH-66 Kum F�Go Page 25 modificarions along SH-66 will be necessary to designate a left turn in to the site if this _ temporary access is needed. Figure 13 illustrates the background plus project peak hour traffic volumes for this interim condirion, as well as the storage requirements and available storage _ along SH-66 at the temporazy access and the adjacent intersection with Mead Street. _ In addition, a level of service evaluation was conducted for this temporary access intersection with the highway. It is expected that all movements will operate acceptably at this intersecrion — as shown in the following Table 4. i Table 4- SH-66 and Temporary Access LOS Results AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour ' Delay LOS Delay LOS Scenario sec/veh sec/veh) 2006 Total — TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL Westbound Left 8.4 A 8.8 A Northbound Left 22.6 C 263 D _ Nmthbound Ri ht 10.5 B 11.9 B Kimley-Horn and Associates, Ina 067951.002 -SH-66 Kum fa Go Page 26 - �00 NORTH �is oe:�asi ec� � � � �5s(a8) E-49fi(446) w I 1 F410(289) �36(39) � IC �1 140(139)� � 368(453)—� � � � 245(353)� 44(68)� v n � � � Q w � � 250' MINIMUMI SH-66 �so' — iso'� — �::::::;:'::::::::'::;;:;;::::::::: }"""' PROJECT :::::: 1:: : : : LOCATION ::; : LEGEND � � Study Area Key Intersection � XxOoO AM(PM) Peak Hour Traffic Volume — Existing Roadwoy �' --- Future Roadway . �X%' LeR Tum Lone Lengths XXX'� _ SH-66 KUM & GO INTERIM ACCESS TRAFFIC VOLUMES FIGURE 13 AND STORAGE REQUIREMENTS - ❑�� KimleY•Han�,�, � and Associates,Inc 5.4 Auxiliary Lane Recommendations along SH-66 � It is recommended that all auxiliary lanes along project frontage be constructed in accordance with the current CDOT State Highway Access Code. The State Highway Access Category _ Schedule categorizes the segment of SH-66 along project frontage as NR-A. In the site vicinity, SH-66 provides two lanes of travel in each direction with a 50 mile per hour posted speed limit. _ As such, turn lane requirements at the existing intersection of SH-66 with Mead Street with development of this Kum&Go project are as follows: • A westbound to southbound left turn decelerafion lane is recommended based on the — projected traffic volume and the highway NR-A classification. The CDOT Access Code threshold for requiring this left turn lane is 10 vehicles per hour, while the project is — anticipated to have 35 vehicles per hour on this movement. This left turn lane presently exists for the access into the commercial development to the east. The code requirement — states this left turn lane is to include 50 feet of storage and 500 feet of deceleration length (which includes a 15 to 1 taper). In essence, this lane would need to include a full lane — width for 370 feet(50 feet of storage plus 320 feet for deceleration) and a 180 foot taper. This existing left turn lane length should be verified and lengthened if necessary to meet the — current Code requirements. — • An eastbound to southbound right turn decelerarion lane is recommended based on the projected traffic volume and the highway NR-A classification. The CDOT Access Code — threshold for requiring this lane is 25 vehicles per hour, while the project is anricipated to have 68 vehicles per hour on this movement. This right turn lane presently exists for the ' access into the commercial development to the east. The code requirement states this right turn lane is to include 500 feet of deceleration length (which includes a 15 to 1 taper). In essence, this lane would need to include a full lane width for 320 feet and a 180 foot taper. This existing right turn lane length should be verified and lengthened if necessary to meet ' the current Code requirements. Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 067951.002 -SH-66 Kum fa Go _ Page 28 • A northbound to eastbound right turn acceleration lane was not found to be required with _ development of this project. The CDOT Access Code threshold for requiring this lane is 50 vehicles per hour, while the project is anticipated to have only 35 vehicles per hour on this — movement. — • A northbound to westbound left turn acceleration lane is not recommended for this intersection based both on anricipated traffic volumes and that the median area is already — being used as a deceleration lane for left turns onto northbound Mead Street. Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 067951.002 —SH-66 Kum £�Go Page 29 6.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Based on the analysis presented in this report, Kimley-Horn believes the proposed Kum & Go — convenience market and gas station will be successfully incorporated into the existing and future roadway network. The proposed project development and expected traffic volumes — resulted in the following recommendarions: — • According to the Colorado State Highway Access Code far category NR-A roadways with a 50 mile per hour speed limit, the following apply with regards to auxiliary turn lane — requirements at the SH-66/Mead Street intersection with development of the Kum & Go project and access provided via the new north-south roadway to align with Mead Street: o A westbound to southbound left turn deceleration lane is recommended based on — the projected traffic volume and the highway NR-A classification. The CDOT Access Code threshold for requiring this left turn lane is 10 vehicles per hour, while the ' project is anticipated to have 35 vehicles per hour on this movement. This left turn lane presenfly exists for the access into the commercial development to the east. The — code requirement states this left turn lane is to include 50 feet of storage and 500 feet of deceleration length (which includes a 15 to 1 taper). In essence, this lane would "� need to include a full lane width for 370 feet (50 feet of storage plus 320 feet for decelerarion) and a 180 foot taper. This existing left turn lane length should be — verified and lengthened if necessary to meet the current Code requirements. o An eastbound to southbound right turn decelerafion lane is recommended based on the projected traffic volume and the highway NR-A classification. The CDOT Access Code threshold for requiring this lane is 25 vehicles per hour, while the project is anticipated to have 68 vehicles per hour on this movement. This right turn lane presently exists far the access into the commercial development to the east. The code requirement states this right turn lane is to include 500 feet of deceleration length (which includes a 15 to 1 taper). In essence, this lane would need to include a full Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 067951.002—SH-66 Kum £�Go Page 30 lane width for 320 feet and a 180 foot taper. This existing right turn lane length _ should be verified and lengthened if necessary to meet the current Code requirements. o A northbound to eastbound right turn acceleration lane was not found to be — required with development of this project. The CDOT Access Code threshold for . requiring this lane is 50 vehicles per hour, while the project is anticipated to have — only 35 vehicles per hour on this movement. — o A northbound to westbound left turn accelerafion lane is not recommended for this intersection based both on anricipated traffic volumes and that the median area is — akeady being used as a deceleration lane for left turns onto northbound Mead Street. — • In the case that right-of-way is not available for construction of the new north-south roadway to align with Mead Street, east of this project; temporazy access to the highway is — proposed. This temporary access is anticipated to allow full tuming movements. Based upon existing left turn demands to the north on Mead Street, and left tums into the site, it is — recommended that this driveway be located a ininiinum 250 feet west of the SH-66 and Mead Street intersection. It is believed sufficient project frontage exists to meet this spacing — requirement. Striping modifications along SH-66 will be necessary to designate a left turn in � to the site if this temparary access is needed. • All on-site and off-site signing and striping improvements should be incorporated into the — Civil Drawings, and conform to CDOT standards, as well as the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices 2003 (MUTCD). Kimley-Harn and Associates,Inc. 067951.002 -SH-66 Kum £a Ga Page 31 _ APPENDICES Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. _ 067951.002/SH-66 Kum Fj Go \I�[ \ APPENDIX A Conceptual Site Plan Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. _ 067951.002/SH-66 Kum £�Go o=r� s��c-szz-sis-n� ggZOS DMO� 'sauioW sad }saM � ,Nwr��x �io-9z:-Sa-�e H�1��S — Nd'Id �,LIS � � o '�DM�JDd uMo}saM 0049 � `��' [ o xaimuo�xi�wMr�q c o � U a � — � '� � �� `0� �8 Wfl�l s�z iix� - �z-1 � xy okN ��6 3mm w�� q a x ; _ c � Q O � _ �� - �� -{-------------j--------- �- - --------'�-------- � I , �o � � ' i � I — j � � i I � � � — ---------- , ; ;.- o ,- ---- --- - , , - � I �i ° I � , --y ; -- -- ; � --- — I %' � i a � I� � , I , '° '��' � � , � ,o�H L ,�o, D, ° I I I � ° �i cL o j gb � I I ' I ' D � °' � � �j I Lp e� i�o� p �i I T ' .��c ,�s D 4 � ! { � D I I D _ g �o i�o; � < � o I � I ' � �� o � � i ' � � � I I — I ``� � `�. � I � ! � j.... - I k': � i _ � ' � r I � L-------- �� , I -�,.r{�. �� . � _ � ---- -L� - �� I ��p � - I � � I � � - I � � I APPENDIX B Intersection Count Sheets Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. _ 067951.002/SH-66 Kum£�Go o=r� _ All Traffic Dafa Services. Inc 9660 W 44th Ave Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 www.alltrafficdata.net File Name : MEAD&SH66AM "' Site Code : 00000000 Start Date : 7/6/2005 Page No : 1 Grou s Printed-Unshifted-Bank 1 -Bank 2 MEAD i, SH 68 MEAD SH 68 �— __ , . Southbountl I Westbountl __ NorthDound EastDountl Start Time Lek Thru Right _ Peds' Left Thru I Right Peds Left Thru _RigM Peds Lelt� Thru Righl Peds InL To�lal ; 07:00 AM 5 0 � 27 0 I 0 89 18 0 0 0 0 0 42 59 0 7 241 07:15 AM 7 0 26 0 0 98 13 0 ', 0 0 0 0 38 60 0 1 241 07:30 AM 5 0 34 0 0 105 13 0 i 0 0 0 0 32 60 0 0 249 � _.,.,_07:45 AM 9 _ 0__._29_ 0 0 107 11 0 0 0 0 0 30 57 0 0 243 Tolal 28 0 it6 0 0 397 55 0 0 0 0 0 142 � 236 0 2 974 ^ 08:47AM 18 0 92� 0 �0 287 �5� 0 0 0 -..._.�0 0 101 186 '--0 0 72� � Grand Tolal �� 44 0 208 0 0 664 112 0 0 0 0 0 243 422 0 2 1895 ApprCh% I 77.5 0 82.5 0 0 85.6 14.4 0 0 0 0 0 36.4 63.3 0 0.3 Tolal% 2.6 0 _ 12.3 0 0 39.T 6.6 0 0 0 _ 0 0 14.3 24.9 0 0.1 Unshifted � 44 0 208 0 0 664 112 0 0 � �0 0 0 243 422 0 2 1695 %Unshifted 100 0 700 _ _ 0 _ 0 �o0 100 . _0 0 0 0__ 0 100 100 0 100 _ 100 � Bank 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 %Bankt 0 0 0 __ 0 0 0 __ 0 _ 0 0 0 __0 0 0 ___, 0 0 0 0 Bank 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 %Bank2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 MEAD Oul In Tolal _ � 252 807 208 M 0 RipM LeI,ft Petls �� 4 A(y � N 0 ~f � * � m� � m� NoM �° ' �-�� a�—� I/6/2005 0]:00 AM f- 2 N — N - 7I6@005 08:45 AM � m y "� v Uns�iReE i° Ir y� � a Bank 1 O1 0l Bank 2 �S—' _ All Traffic Data Services, Inc 9660 W 44th Ave Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 www.alltrafficdata.net File Name : MEAD&SH66AM - Site Code : 00000000 Start Date : 7/6/2005 Page No : 2 --- _ Peak Hour Analysis From 07 00 AM to 08 45 q r� SH 86 MEAD � SH 66 Southbound _ i Westbound T Northbountl Eastbound StaA 7ime � Left T�m RigM Peds .�.ow! LEft Thm RigM1� Peds ..p..,u LC%�`Thm Rig�t Pe75 .�..<u LEft TMi RiqM PeEs r.w..ew im.ro�a� M-Peak 1 0(1 . .. . -.. Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:00 AM 07:00AM 5 0 27 0 32i 0 89 18 p 107 0 0 0 0 0 42 59 0 1 102 2qi 07:15 AM 7 0 26 0 33! 0 98 13 0 109 0 0 0 0 0 38 80 0 7 99 241 07:30 AM 5 0 34 0 39 i 0 105 13 0 118 0 0 0 0 0 32 60 0 0 92 2d9 � 07:45 AM 9 0 28 0 38 0 107 �� 0 118 0 0 0 0 0 30 57 0 0 87 243 __ -_' —_ _ —.-..— TrnalVolume p6 0 ii6 0 142 0 397 55 0 452 0 0 0 0 0 142 236 0 2 380 974 %App.Totai 18.3 0 81.7 0 0 87.8 122 0 0 0 0 0 37.4 62.1 0 0.5 _— — — _ _ PHF 722 .000 .853 .000 .910 .000 .928 764 __000 .958 .000 .000_ .000 .000 .000 ,845 .983 000 500_ .931 .978 '� MEAD Out In Total 1W 142 339� � 116 26 0 Right Lelft Petls I ♦� 4 — Peak Hour Data m� �m o � =v� T � � NS NOM �u IScn i°ne ^ N i ^�� Peak Hour 8epins a107:00 AM �2 J N 5� N N _� � » Unshifletl � a Bank 1 o y � O Benk2____. � � �E a— _ All Traf/ic Data Services, Inc 9660 W 44th Ave Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 www.alltra�cdata.net File Name : MEAD&SH66AM - Site Code : 00000000 Start Date : 7/6/2005 Page No : 3 _ All Traffic Data Services, Inc 9660 W 44th Ave Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 www.alltrafficdata.net File Name : MEAD&SH66PM Site Code : 00000000 Start Date : 7/6/2005 Page No : 1 __ ..._ ____ ___. Grouos Printed-UnshiNed.-Bank 1 -Bank 2 MEAD SH e6 MEAD SH 66 � — Southbound __ _ Westbound _ Northbountl __ Eastbound _ Start Time Le(1 Thm Right Peds Lefl Thm Right Peds Left Thru Right Peds Left Thru Right Peds InL Total _— - - - -- Faclor . 1.0 1 0 1.0 1.0 1.0 _ 1.0 1.0 7.0 1.0 1.0 1 0 __ 1,0 1.0 _ 1.0 � 1.0 1.0 04:00 PM t0 0 28 0 0 74 10 0 0 0 0 0 32 80 0 0 234 � 04:15 PM 5 0 33 0 0 63 12 0 0 0 0 0 22 82 0 0 217 04:30 PM 8 0 56 0 0 65 10 0 0 0 0 0 33 97 0 0 269 04:45 PM 18 0 39 0 0 63 8 0 0 0 0 0 38 89 0 0 255 TOWI � 41 0 156 0 0 ��265 40 0 0 0 0 0 125 348 0 0 975 � 05:00 PM 9 0 59 0 0 70 79 0 0 0 0 0 31 85 0 0 273 05:15 PM 9 0 33 0 1 79 10 0 0 0 0 0 30 68 1 0 231 05:30 PM 17 0 38 0 0 64 B 0 0 0 0 0 25 112 0 0 262 05:45PM_ 6 _. 0 25 0 _0__ 57 14 0 ._ 0 0., 0 0 18 110 0 0 230 Total 41 0 155 0 1 270 49 0 0 0 0 � 0 104 375 1� 0 996 Grand Tolal 82 0 311 0 1 535 89 0 0 0 0 0 229 723 1 0 1971 ADP�h% 20.9 0 79.1 0 0.2 85.8 142 0 0 0 0 0 24 75.9 0.1 0 ___ Tolal% 42 0 15.8 _ 0 0.1 27.1 4.5 0 0 0 0 0 1t6 3fi7 0.� 0 UnshiRed 82 0 311 0 7 535 89 0 0 0 0 0 229 723 1 � 0 1971 — %Unshifted 10Q. 0 100 0 __ 100 100._ 100 0 0 0 0__ 0 100 100 700 0 700 Bank 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 � 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 %Bank1 0 ,,, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Bank 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 %Bank2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 MEA� ul In Talal 318 393 711 311 0 82 0 — Right Thru Left Petls � 1 4 _. . J o� rvo-1 1 �� WO NaM 1 �^i c� r�� "—�� I &' �' 7/6/2005 04:00 PM � a— ]/6/2005 05:45 PM "'� $ '8� �s U u�i 0� Unshi(tetl � �a Bank i � 'a�o ^ a Benk 2__ �o o�—' _ —' . _� '— _. —. .. � ! � � I � I �I �efl Thru �PoAht PeGs � _.OL OL.... ��0. —_l, -- � �.. � �01 �� Out In Total _ All Traffic Data Services, Inc 9660 W 441h Ave Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 www.alltrafficdata.net File Name : MEAD&SH66PM - Site Code : 00000000 Start Date : 7/6/2005 Page No : 2 — � � _ : _ . . :� . . 1 � 11 - � . , - ' : 1 1 . • �� MEAD SH66 MEAD �SHEastbountl Southbound WesiDound Northbound I °^e LEft N A�GM etls y.ne. �eR i m Rig�l e s �.r.w �ery m RigM1t s ��en �u Rg�t s y...w im.imai � Peak Hour Malysis From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM-Peak 1 of t Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:30 PM 04:30 PM 8 0 56 0 64 0 65 10 0 75 0 0 0 0 0 33 9� 0 0 �30 269 04:45 PM �8 0 39 0 57 0 63 8 0 71 0 0 0 0 0 I 38 89 0 0 127 255 05:00 PM 9 0 59 p 68 0 70 18 0 89 0 0 0 0 0 31 85 0 0 116 2�3 '� 05:15 PM 9 0 33 0 42 � �9 70 0 90 0 0 0 0 0 30 68 � 0 99 237 Tomlvowme 44 0 187 0 231 1 277 47 0 325 0 0 0 0 0 132 339 1 0 �472 7028 xnpp.iaei �g 0 81 0 0.3 852 14.5 0 0 0 0 0 28 77.8 02 0 PHF 611 .000 792 .000 .849 250 .877 .818 �.000 -903 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .868 .874 250 �.000 .908 .941 _ All TraKic Data Services. Inc 9660 W 441h Ave Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 www.alltra�cdata.net File Name : MEAD&SH66PM - Site Code : 00000000 Start Date : 7/6/2005 Page No : 3 � MEAD � In To�lal � 787 0 Rig�l Thru Lelft PeAs � 1 v --- -- " Peak Hour Data F� �� t t�. � tA � �J � m Norlh °'^� �� ~2� � �p Peak Hour Begins al 04:30 PM - �+� � r �n `° 'rc� UnshifteG �� ` y� Bank 1 m 8 nk2 0� 8 0 a � o — r �, T r Th�u ht PeGs � O Oul In Toql � APPENDIX C CDOT Traffic Information for SH-66 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. _ 067951.002/SH-66 Kum f�Ga o=r� Traffic Information for Highway 0�6 From RefPoint 40 To RefPoint 45 ' _ _ __ __ ay�px � �xc : a �''#u � ��P �� 4 i�+ '�`�'� $ I� ,��Y �i� I "' � t�"�. �� 3 ��r`� t� p � : �.},�t�p p�� * g �' v i�' +- +�'�� I � � � f �'�� {��;} t �1 .�h5� � f� §� �� i � '��w*�. �. s� �+� j� — 7 �,`' b� � En r%��`�$.. ��yfii�, y�yyt� � '� '�y��} � f�}'� �i � a d � � M"� A1 �Cr�XI�Ef}��S� � �{��#j�� h'N � � h � � � � ..t � y i . �! � t Y '� ��ykt.� t( � � SY V'�ti ,^'� P I �.:.:'f�;i°�tH� 9 MH� � ��II 5 Yt.i! q ,e'� ��,� i� � � . �d . �� ' ��4y.n�.7� r� ' .. ._5Fd, ...� ..i, r I.. . .im.... ' ' . �ecn u.:.e. .e ... � . u ,. . . .�.. _ '� 066B 42.737��44.921 ;ON SH 66 E/O I-25, 12 500�� 2004� � � 580� 560 9.10% 1.67 12�' 25,350�� i�E/O I-25 E Factor i � __ _ _ � "FRONTAGE RD APPENDIX D Trip Generation Worksheet Kimley-Horn and Assaciates, Inc. 067951.002/SH-66 Kum £r Go \I�C \ ��f� Kimiey-Hom �. . and Assaaates,Inc, Project SH-66 Kum &Go — Subjecf Trip Generation for Gasoline/Service Station with Convenience Market Designed by EAG Dafe July 08, 2005 Job No. 67951.002 Checked by Dafe Sheet No. 1 of 1 TRIP GENERATION MANUAL TECHNIQUES — ITE Trio Generation Manual7th Edition,Average Rate Equations Land Use Code-Gasoline/Service Station with Convenience Store (945) Independant Variable-Vehicle Fueling Positions(X) Vehicle Fueling Positions= 16 Positions — X = 16 T = Average Vehicle Trip Ends — Peak Hour of Adiacent Street Treffic. One Hour Between 7 and 9 a m (Paae 1799) Average Weekday Directional Distribution: 50% ent. 50% exit. _ T= 10.06(X) T = 161 Average Vehicle Trip Ends T= 10.06` 16 80 entering 81 exiting 80 + 81 = 161 Peak Hour of Adiacent Street Traffic. One Hour Between 4 and 6 o m (oaae 17921 Average Weekday Diredional Distribution: 50% ent. 50% exit. T= 13.38 (X) T = 214 Average Vehicle Trip Ends T= 13.38* 16.000 107 entering 107 exiting 107 + 107 = 214 Weekdav(oaae 17981 Average Weekday Directional Distribution: 50%entering, 50°/a exiting — T= 162.78(X) T = 2604 Average Vehicle Trip Ends T= 162.78" 16.000 1302 entering 1302 exiting — 1302 + 1302 = 2604 Non-Pass-bv Trin Volumes(oaaes 72 and 74 Trio Generetion Handbook June 20041 _ PM Peak Hour= 56% Pass By AM Peak Hour= 62% Pass By IN Out Total AM Peak 30 31 61 PM Peak 47 47 94 — Daily 651 651 1302 �N iGmieyHorn '■■r and Assoc(atas, Inc. Project SH-66 Kum&Go �" Subject Trip Generation for anticipated surrounding development Designed by EAG Date July 08, 2005 Job No. Checked by Date Sheet No. 1 of 1 TRIP GENERATION MANUAL TECHNIQUES ITE Trio Generation Manual 7th Edition, Average Rates _ Land Use Code- Office Park(750) Independant Variable-Acres _ Acres= 25.0 X = 25.0 T =Average Vehicle Trip Ends — AM Peak Hour luaae 12641 Average Weekday Directional Distribution: 89% ent. 11% exit. — T= 25.65 (X) T = 641 Average Vehicle Trip Ends T= 25.65 * 25 570 entering 71 exiting _ 570 (*) • 71 = 641 (*) TRIP END WAS CHANGED BY t TO SATISFY THE TOTAL _ PM Peak Hour Ipaae 12651 Average Weekday Directional Distribution: 14% ent. 86% exit. T= 2828 (X) T = 707 Average Vehicle Trip Ends " T= 2828* 25 99 entering 608 exiting 99 + 608 = 707 Weekdav Ipaue 12631 Average Weekday Directional Distribution: 50% entering, 50% exiting T= 195.11 (X) T = 4878 Average Vehicle Trip Ends _ (T)= 195.11 * 25 2439 entering 2439 exiting 2439 + 2439 = 4878 G:\-tpto\067951002 - Evans Kum&Go\[OFFPARK Acres.XLS]Sheet 1 APPENDIX E HCS Intersection Analysis Worksheets Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. _ 067951.002/SH-66 Kurn F�Go \I�� TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY _.:.. . ,-, ,s, , � :., � �� c �rt�,ii ... -y�+ �4� �. 3t,�,�# d�� d v v a , . .. ,..,.x.�° :�:. �r _ �'.<< ..��' „t�_: ..._.,�� !,i �' '�� , . ". .�u ^ ! � 1 � Analyst EAG Intersection SH-66/Mead Street AgencylCo. Kimley-Horn Jurisdiction CDOT Date Performed 7/8/2005 Analysis Year 2005 Analysis Time Period AM Existing Pro'ect Descri tion 067951002-SH-66 Kum & Go _ EasUWest Street: SH-66 North/South Street: Mead Street Intersection Orientation: East-West Stud Period hrs : 0.25 ' � : .::;: 4 }t ' ,�'4i ... t fi.: t � .rt 3 .� M4 P�i'j t('H .; :.�. �• 61rs��L��.m,�",�',..�.. �d .fl�-�..��i.:. . �'�.', ,,,�,�i�i4-^ $��y�'�F:v S- 'r:.'� ,�'.f_s�„ '� ,s. ,��t.: _ Ma'or Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R _ Volume vehlh 142 236 0 0 397 55 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 Hourl Flow Rate (veh/h) 144 240 0 0 405 56 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PH� 0 - -- 0 -- — Median pe Raised curb _ RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 1 1 0 0 1 1 Configuration L T T R _ U stream Si nal 0 0 MinorStreet Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 � L T R L T R Volume veh/h 0 0 0 26 0 116 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 _ Hourl Flow Rate (veh/h) 0 0 0 26 0 118 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PH� 0 0 0 0 0 0 _ Percent grade (%) 0 0 Flared approach N N Storage 0 0 — RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 1 0 1 Configuration L R . , � � .� , _. ._ . Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound _ Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L L R Volume, v (vph) 144 26 118 _ Capacity, cm (vph) 1111 383 650 v/c ratio 0.13 0.07 0.18 Queue length (95%) 0.45 0.22 0.66 — Control Delay (s/veh) 8.7 15.1 11.8 LOS A C 8 _ Approach delay (s/veh) -- -- 12.4 Approach LOS -- -- 8 HCS2000T'� Copyright 2i 2003 University of Fbrida,All Rights Reserved Version 4.Id TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY . .m . . � �f,' i � N>>i�.:.: ��:a � .:: i':�.,:. n ,�. � „� ,� x ,., n�;:�: �;-- � ir' .;� . �, . f�,�. ' � . �.:.:...... . _� .�k��U��.'. .. ,: �3fi. .��: .e,1.�i,�.�'r : Analyst EAG Intersection SH-66/Mead Street Agency/Co. Kimley-Horn Jurisdiction CDOT _ Date Performed 7/8/2005 Analysis Year 2005 Analysis Time Period PM Existing Pro'ect Descri tion 067951002-SH-66 Kum & Go _ EastlWest Street: SH-66 North/South Street: Mead Street Intersection Orientation: East-West Stud Period hrs : 0.25 � �_:�� ,� _ 0 ��: � �t } �'yF d : .X;,�,d r exsa�t� � a: iv+� r : • . . .::; ; � ; �n �. ;�� u _ ��'' rtt. �. :w '��."e''A}.?'� n i ,�'+� ,,rv{:.: z . _ Ma'or Street Eastbound WestboundX Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R _ Volume veh/h 132 339 0 0 277 47 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 140 360 0 0 294 50 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PH� 0 -- -- 0 -- -- Median type Raised curb _ RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 1 1 0 0 1 1 Configuration L T T R U stream Si nal 0 0 MinorStreet Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 _. L T R L T R Volume vehlh 0 0 0 44 0 187 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 � Hourl Flow Rate (veh/h) 0 0 0 46 0 198 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PH� 0 0 0 0 0 0 _ Percent grade(%) 0 0 Flared approach N N Storage 0 0 — RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 1 0 1 Confi uration L R Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound _ Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L L R Volume, v (vph) 140 46 198 — Capacity, cm (vph) 1226 373 750 v/c ratio 0.11 0.12 0.26 Queue length (95%) 0.39 0.42 1.06 Control Delay (s/veh) 8.3 16.0 11.5 LOS A C 8 _ Approach delay (s/veh) -- -- 12.4 Approach LOS -- -- 8 HCS1000TM Copyright�2003 Universiry of Fbrida,All Rights Reserved Version 4.I J TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY . �. . ... .. .,�,. S:t� a.:;:;�, {fi{9}� � i��,. �ry�' ..�. ...:i!>.�,y � �}{,j�� .. .,,, .. � _ .,t�. �I w`..,r.�t:rT `m-: 3I �� ie�'�li��i.�r �� '� Sv5C��& Analyst EAG Intersection SH-66/Mead Street Agency/Co. Kimley-Horn Jurisdiction CDOT _ Date Performed 7/8/2005 Analysis Year 2006 Analysis Time Period AM Background Pro'ect Descri tion 067951002- SH-66 Kum & Go _ EasUWest Street: SH-66 North/South Street: Mead Street Intersection Orientation: East-West Stud Period hrs : 0.25 :a� � �� w ... . s. ...,..; :�; ' y'' "� �V'i � �, �F�- rn ,, � ;�:. s�.(�g � � i.„� ` � ' �� '�'� ' � ;".� ��'�J.a��-�(r'.� „ ' _s�;��:�."- �1...+�'.v�t'y. f. ,�_��Er"``v�.w.� b _ Ma'or Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R _ Volume veh/h 146 242 0 0 407 56 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 Hourl Fiow Rate (veh/h) 148 246 0 0 415 57 Proportion of heavy � vehicles, PH� � '- — 0 � — Median type Raised curb _ RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 1 1 0 0 1 1 Configuration L T T R _ U stream Si nal 0 0 MinorStreet Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 _ L T R L T R Volume veh/h 0 0 0 27 0 119 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 _ Hourl Flow Rate (vehlh) 0 0 0 27 0 121 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PH� 0 0 0 0 0 0 _ Percent grade(%) 0 0 Flared approach N N Storage 0 0 — RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 1 0 1 Confi uration L R , _; h.h: Er, Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L � {� Volume, v(vph) 148 p7 �2� _ Capacity, cm (vph) 1100 374 642 v/c ratio 0.13 0.07 0.19 Queue length (95%) 0.46 0.23 0.69 — Control Delay (s/veh) 8.8 15.4 11.9 LOS A C g Approach delay (s/veh) -- -- �2.5 r Approach LOS -- -- g HCS1000T'� Copyright�2003 Universiry oCFlorida,All Rights Reserved Version 4.Id ..:, a-., TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY r. � :.� _.= M, � ,fir m.,� ,�, �. � — ,; .. .�� . �., � s �� `�'�. � � ;:, r a - . _ r , F _�: Analyst EAG Intersection SH-66/Mead Street Agency/Co. Kimley-Horn Jurisdiction CDOT _ Date Pertormed 7/8/2005 Analysis Year 2006 Analysis Time Period PM Background Pro'ect Descri tion 067951002-SH-66 Kum & Go _ EasUWest Street: SH-66 North/South Street: Mead Street Intersection Orientation: East-West Stud Period hrs : 0.25 .. .. ,.. ,�:;x -. ,: ��, . . . . Fr: � ,,:ia y�� . ..,�,r. � � a � � � � � Z� .. � . �""_� ' y''�"i . . � .:, e a...::i .� .; . .n .. .rnR' ' . .�s kC °�..._.a#�n A{- �k��; _ Ma'or Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R _ Volume veh/h 135 348 0 0 284 48 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 143 370 0 0 302 51 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PH� � -' -- 0 -- � Median type Raised curb _ RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 1 1 0 0 1 1 Configuration L T T R _ U stream Si nal 0 0 MinorStreet Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 _ L T R L T R Volume veh/h 0 0 0 45 0 192 Peak-hourfactor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 � Hourl Flow Rate (veh/h) 0 0 0 47 0 204 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PH� 0 0 0 0 0 0 _ Percent grade (%) 0 0 Flared approach N /y Storage 0 0 — RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 1 0 1 Configuration L R Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound _ Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L L R Volume, v (vph) 143 47 204 — Capacity, cm (vph) 1217 365 742 v/c ratio 0.12 0.13 0.27 Queue length (95%) 0.40 0.44 1.12 Control Delay (s/veh) 8.4 16.3 11.7 LOS A C 8 ^ Approach delay(s/veh) -- -- �2.5 Approach LOS -- -- g NCS2000T'� Copyright O 2003 Oniversiry of Florida,All Rights Reserved Version 4.1d TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY � ,;��_ „ .�_ . � �.�, �,r-,+ ,.. �� x :,.:��,-, � y'�;'��r, �� (�:q.�.��, � ��• - 0 � .r o_ry. i ... I� . . I., u . ,e+n'ui...� ., e. � ..( Analyst EAG Intersection SH-66/Mead Street AgencylCo. Kimley-Horn Jurisdiction CDOT _ Date Performed 7/8/2005 Analysis Year 2006 Analysis Time Period AM Total Pro ect Descri tion 067951002-SH-66 Kum & Go _ EastlWest Street: SH-66 North/South Street: Mead Street Intersection Orientation: East-West Stud Period hrs : 0.25 _ � � � aw� ; : n = �� :, � . ,:. � �sEr ,� � � i t ��u F r�°'.: , .. ., .,I,.�. `�. .v� ,r,�� i� 'h�b � �.tn}�tl" �j'��4 iy r __ .. ��.. . ..:�m . . .. ....<< . ::.:. : . . .��: . .�. �. . . _ Ma'or Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R _ Volume veh/h 146 222 44 33 377 56 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 Hourl Flow Rate (veh/h) 148 226 44 33 384 57 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PH� 0 - - 0 — -- Median t e Raised curb _ RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 1 1 1 1 1 1 Configuration L T R L T R U stream Si nal 1 0 MinorStreet Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 _ L T R L T R Volume veh/h 55 2 23 27 3 119 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 _ Hourl Flow Rate (veh/h) 56 2 23 27 3 121 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PH� 0 0 0 0 0 0 _ Percent grade (%) 0 0 Flared approach N N Storage 0 0 — RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 0 1 1 0 1 1 Confi uration LT R LT R Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound _ Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L L LT R LT R Volume, v (vph) 148 33 58 23 30 121 _ Capacity, cm (vph) 1130 1305 219 818 299 668 v/c ratio 0.13 0.03 0.26 0.03 0.10 0.18 Queue length (95%) 0.45 0.08 1.03 0.09 0.33 0.66 — Control Delay (s/veh) 8.7 7.8 27.3 9.5 18.4 11.6 LOS A A D A C 8 _ Approach delay (s/veh) -- -- 22.2 12.9 Approach LOS -- -- C 8 HCS2000TM Copyright�2003 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved Version 4.Id TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY ,:- ,�::. � � -„s � '^` �g '��,�':�"�'� r,��;` `` �#;'=�r � �,:;'. �� „ � � 1 i� f° _ Analyst EAG Intersection SH-66/Mead Street Agency/Co. Kimley-Horn Jurisdiction CDOT Date Performed 7/8/2005 Analysis Year 2006 Analysis Time Period PM Total Pro'ect Descri tion 067951002-SH-66 Kum 8 Go _ East/West Street: SH-66 North/South Street: Mead Street Intersection Orientation: East-West Stud Period hrs : 0.25 ,� ,_ 3 � � : ,�„� . ., x�� ;r �� . �. . c �3H ,. .m: m:.' . " �. . � i......:.....v ....� . �h�...x � . � . .rz. . .i ,t-;: _ Ma'or Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R _ Volume veh/h 135 318 68 35 254 48 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 143 338 72 37 270 51 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PH� 0 -- -- 0 -- — Median e Raised curb _ RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 1 1 1 1 1 1 Configuration L T R L T R _ U stream Si nal 0 0 MinorStreet Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 _ L T R L T R Volume veh/h 68 4 35 45 4 192 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 _ Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 72 4 37 47 4 204 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PH� 0 0 0 0 0 0 _ Percent grade (%) 0 0 Flared approach N N Storage 0 0 — RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 0 1 1 0 1 1 Configuration LT R LT R _ Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L L LT R LT R Volume,v (vph) 143 37 76 37 51 204 � Capacity, cm (vph) 1250 1160 204 709 270 774 v/c ratio 0.11 0.03 0.37 0.05 0.19 0.26 Queue length (95%) 0.39 0.10 1.62 0.16 0.68 1.06 — Control Delay (s/veh) 8.3 8.2 32.8 10.4 21.4 11.3 LOS A A D B C 8 Approach delay (s/veh) -- -- 25.4 13.3 Approach LOS -- -- D B HCS1000T'� Copyright�2003 University of Fbrida,All Rights Reserved Version 4.Id SHORT REPORT ��- ;. h.. _... ,,,,,�� e � ,.� n ..:, �� . , s �' �Y { ( �Y�i: y yyy�If I" I ' £ J h i J E �'i 'k � Ab1Y{+ �..��' i Y .u��n f r u1"'�- .�E e I&'�� '— Malyst EAG Intersection SH-66/Mead Street Agency or Co. Kimley-Horn Area Type All other areas Date Pertormed 7/8/2005 Jurisdiction CDOT _ Time Period AM Background Analysis Year 2025 �� .�, .. .... �e,�� - � �� `qg �t,. __�"'"� �i� n` t�� ra'� � �f Ur�v»Yv a vr w p }� . e :: t . �. ' : , -� s: .�.�.� ,t� . . :` . . ..,: :: t... ,... .....�..., r..__ �=k ",_;�„�.�¢�s ^,�:_,...� �'.:� ... .:,.: EB WB NB SB — LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Num. of Lanes 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Lane group L T R L T R L T R L T R Volume v h 237 394 456 57 663 92 57 7 7 43 57 194 % Heav veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 _ PHF 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 Actuated PIA P P P P P P P P P P P P Startu lost time 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Ext. eff. reen 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 — Arrival e 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Ped/Bike/RTOR Volume 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12,0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking/Grade/Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N _ Parking/hr Bus stops/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 — Phasin Excl. Left EW Perm 03 04 Excl. Left NS Perm 07 08 Timing G = 15.0 G = 76.0 G = G = G = 5.0 G = 10.0 G = G = Y= 3 Y = 4 Y= Y= Y= 3 Y= 4 Y= Y= _ Duration of Anal sis hrs = 0.25 C cle Len th C = 120.0 r EB WB NB SB — Adj.flow rate 242 402 465 58 677 94 58 7 7 44 58 198 Lane group cap. 564 1203 1144 778 1203 1144 177 158 390 182 158 390 _ v/c ratio 0.43 0.33 0.41 0.07 0.56 0.08 0.33 0.04 0.02 0.24 0.37 0.51 Green ratio 0.78 0.63 0.71 0.78 0.63 0.71 0.15 0.08 0.24 0.15 0.08 0.24 Unif. delay d1 7.5 10.2 7.2 3.6 12.5 5.4 44.9 50.6 34.7 44.5 52.0 39.3 Delay factor k 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 Increm. delay d2 2.4 0.7 1.1 0.2 1.9 0.1 4.9 0.5 0.1 3.1 6.5 4.7 " PF factor 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Control delay 9.9 11.0 8.2 3.8 14.4 5.6 49.7 51.1 34.7 47.6 58.5 44.0 ,,,, Lane group LOS A 8 A A 8 A D D C D E D Apprch. delay 9.6 12.7 48.4 47.3 Approach LOS A 8 D D Intersec. delay 16.8 Intersection LOS 8 I HCS2000T�`� Copyright�2000 Universiry of Florida,All RigMs Reserved Version 4.1e SHORT REPORT .r _k P ...v h'��i C '�3� � �Y �?: 'e .�� ..., { $..�� u-�ari}.iA., Stk�:rid'(� i �,,A ..i� ., i :; d,� . .>.e"C'i"., _v.v.�..�.i . d „�..: ..: ��A#�C111��*�iiuPi'��fl��F�(�i"tY��i#��k�' ?S � IF '': + �. � ... M`rti,r?e . ....er .#;t .��€�t �,m'�e"�� — Analyst EAG Intersection SH-66/Mead Street Agency or Co. Kimley-Horn Area Type All other areas Date Pertormed 7/8/2005 Jurisdiction CDOT _ Time Period PM Background Analysis Year 2025 ,,. . . , ,w; � ' . 7 va�,el. . �:: ��.„F-�1. �`_...�,� '. `��i��:..�' ,�.tl,�, -.t �S'U `�. �S`n�#�'�,u,'�� . .�::ar w.s,.s,�,7.xr,a' t c t�v! as�'t.: n:,�.9i%ni-�_._',_ EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Num. of Lanes 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 _ Lane group L T R L T R L T R L T R Volume v h 220 566 79 10 462 78 486 61 61 73 10 312 % Heav veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 _ PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Actuated P/A P P p p p p p p p p p p Startu losttime 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2,0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Ext. eff. reen 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival e 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 _ Ped/BikeIRTOR Volume 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking/Grade/Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N � Parking/hr Bus stops/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 — Phasin Excl. Left EW Perm 03 04 Excl. Left NS Perm 07 08 Timing G = 4.0 G = 54.0 G = G = G = 11.0 G = 37.0 G = G = Y = 3 Y= 4 Y= Y = Y = 3 Y = 4 Y = Y= _ Duration of Anal sis hrs = 0.25 C cle Len th C = 120.0 EB WB NB SB Adj.flow rate 234 602 84 11 491 83 517 65 65 78 11 332 Lane group cap. 307 855 929 225 855 929 593 586 606 572 586 606 _ v/c ratio 0.76 0.70 0.09 0.05 0.57 0.09 0.87 0.11 0.11 0.14 0.02 0.55 Green ratio 0.51 0.45 0.57 0.51 0.45 0.57 0.43 0.31 0.38 0.43 0.31 0.38 _ Unif. delay d1 34.2 26.6 11.4 19.2 24.5 11.4 33.3 29.7 24.4 20.8 28.9 29.5 Delay factor k 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 Increm. delay d2 16.3 4.8 0.2 0.4 2.8 0.2 16.1 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.1 3.5 — PF factor 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Control delay 50.5 31.4 11.6 19.6 27.3 11.6 49.5 30.1 24.8 21.3 28.9 33.0 _ Lane group LOS D C 8 B C B D C C C C C Apprch. delay 34.4 24.9 45.0 30.8 Approach LOS C C D C r Intersec. delay 34.3 Intersection LOS C HCS2000TM CopyrigM O 2000 Universiry of Fiorida,All Rights Reserved Version 4.1e �.� � SHORT REPORT `.�}'�' �t�'i 3.. � x-r�mt' '� � d''�;"' � . a,•' ' _'a y "�: :G t,..n �� !.� y.:. ��.� _4'�.. ..a "kr:��fG- � �� : � i Y�Ccy�. �' .��..3._:��°.�" .��z ,.S��:�!sF. ._ '�� . Analyst EAG Intersection SH-66/Mead Street Agency or Co. Kimley-Horn Area Type All other areas Date Performed 7/8/2005 Jurisdiction CDOT — Time Period AM Total Analysis Year 2025 ,. . , ,. .,,- - t f � �'r �, . .,�p��d�..�.'��:t �� N�r f y�i,t �k�S}rt.L^?I'h u r�+f��Ht� �o- �*��'��*t�.... .s�v F;:I x�',7`, : �� .0�"'".� EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Num. of Lanes 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 _ Lane group L T R L T R L T R L T R Volume v h 237 374 500 90 633 92 112 9 30 43 60 194 % Heav veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 , PHF 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 Actuated P/A P P P P P P P P P P P P Startu lost time 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 _ Ext. eff, reen 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival t e 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 _ Ped/Bike/RTOR Volume 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking/Grade/Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N _ Parking/hr Bus stops/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 — Phasin ExG. Left EW Perm 03 04 Excl. Left NS Perm 07 08 Timing G = 15.0 G = 76.0 G = G = G = 5.0 G = 10.0 G = G = Y= 3 Y= 4 Y = Y= Y = 3 Y= 4 Y = Y = — Duration of Anal sis hrs = 0.25 C cle Len th C = 120.0 EB WB NB SB Adj.flow rate 242 382 510 92 646 94 114 9 31 44 61 198 Lane group cap. 587 1203 1144 795 1203 1144 177 158 390 182 158 390 — v/c ratio 0.41 0.32 0.45 0.12 0.54 0.08 0.64 0.06 0.08 0.24 0.39 0.51 Green ratio 0.78 0.63 0.71 0.78 0.63 0.71 0.15 0.08 0.24 0.15 0.08 0.24 _ Unif.delay d1 6.9 10.1 7.5 3.6 12.2 5.4 48.4 50.7 35.2 44.5 52.1 39.3 Delay factor k 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 Increm. delay d2 2.1 0.7 1.3 0.3 1J 0.1 16.7 0.7 0.4 3.1 7.0 4J — PF factor 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Control delay 9.0 10.8 8.7 3.9 13.9 5.6 65.0 51.3 35.6 47.6 59.1 44.0 — Lane group LOS A B A A 8 A E D D D E D Apprch. delay 9.5 11.9 58.3 47.6 Approach LOS A B E D Intersec. delay 18.2 Intersection LOS 8 HCS1000T'� Copyright�2000 Univeaity of Florida,All RigMs Reserved Version 4.1e + SHORT REPORT � � . ,. . " � "��P._.. .r��'.; ,. � _., �z`�J"�,r`.�}`.hE::��v .�,��'�_ . � �,��. : �� ., .s;i'��L,,?g�..,, '� _-��5�.„�xr`�:`.�,i;_ — Analyst EAG Intersection SH-66/Mead Street Agency or Co. Kimley-Horn Area Type All other areas Date Pertormed 7/8/2005 Jurisdiction CDOT _ Time Period PM Total Analysis Year 2025 �_�:: � s (j� : F� �..!�� ^` . � ��..'..� .� .,°�t�: `.. t µ��. .,:: 5 F�i i ,.; 3i9°v�'::� .�a. z i t + k' 3��,+ a �: . ' . uh�e�.... ....iE. u .. ! �'7�.at .i-.e:.iw J.v .. � '-3 G �� 4 �. ...p . EB WB NB SB — LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Num. of Lanes 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 _ Lane group L T R L T R L T R L T R Volume v h 220 536 147 45 432 78 554 65 96 73 14 312 % Heav veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 _ PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Actuated P/A P P P P P P P P P P P P Startu lost time 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 ` Ext. eff. reen 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival t e 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 � Ped/Bike/RTOR Volume 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking/Grade/Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N _ Parking/hr Bus stops/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 — Phasin Excl. Left EW Perm 03 04 Excl. Left NS Perm 07 08 Timing G = 4.0 G = 54.0 G = G = G = 11.0 G = 37.0 G = G = Y= 3 Y= 4 Y= Y= Y = 3 Y= 4 Y= Y = , Duration of Anal sis hrs = 0.25 C cle Len th C = 120.0 EB WB NB SB — Adj.flow rate 234 570 156 48 460 83 589 69 102 78 15 332 Lane group cap. 331 855 929 248 855 929 591 586 606 571 586 606 _ v/c ratio 0.71 0.67 0.17 0.19 0.54 0.09 1.00 0.12 0.17 0.14 0.03 0.55 Green ratio 0.51 0.45 0.57 0.51 0.45 0.57 0.43 0.31 0.38 0.43 0.31 0.38 Unif. delay d1 32.2 25.9 12.0 19.0 23.9 11.4 36.6 29.8 25.0 20.8 28.9 29.5 � Delay factor k 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 Increm. delay d2 12.0 4.1 0.4 1.7 2.4 0.2 36.2 0.4 0.6 0.5 0.1 3.5 " PF factor 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Control delay 44.3 30.0 12.4 20.8 26.4 11.6 72.8 30.2 25.6 21.3 29.0 33.0 _ Lane group LOS D C B C C B E C C C C C Apprch. delay 30.6 23.8 62.6 30.7 Approach LOS C C E C Intersec. delay 38.1 Intersection LOS D HCS1000TM Copyright O 20W University of Florida,All Rights Reserved Version 4.l e � Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 2 — TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY ,_,..,. . m � ,._ � ,, -r �� ;:: � � ,1 u �fi = � �; �! ��„�,.'ii:�.... !u t:�f� ..�„ �..-��.� ..i �. ��C�7 a�� ;ni.�� .. .'.:' �:. ., i,.��r .k`�g. � Analyst CDR Intersection SH-66& Temporary Access Agency/Co. Kimley-Horn �urisdiction Weld County, CO Date Performed 7/12/2005 Analysis Year 2006 — Analysis Time Period Total AM Peak Pro'ect Descri tion SH-66 Kum 8 Go _ EasUWest Street: SH-66 North/South Street: Tem ora Access Intersection Orientation: East-West Stud Period hrs : 0.25 _ , .. ::��:� :� -� �: ��:�� . �� ..a, � , .x_ J ' l:'� �'' ��.� :n.iy. . .�f1 _ Ma'or Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R _ Volume veh/h 0 368 44 36 496 0 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Fiow Rate 0 387 46 37 522 0 veh/h — Proportion of heavy vehicles, PH� � -- — 10 -- — Median pe Undivided RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 1 1 0 Configuration TR L T U stream Si nal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound _ Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 55 0 25 0 0 0 , Peak-hourfactor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate 57 0 26 0 0 0 veh/h Proportion of heavy — vehicles, PH� 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent grade (%) 0 0 Flared approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized? 0 0 � Lanes 1 0 1 0 0 0 Configuration L R , - , ,. .,. �., _ _ . , : — Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L L R ' Volume, v (vph) 37 57 26 Capacity, cm (vph) 1085 261 646 _ v/c ratio 0.03 0.22 0.04 Queue length (95%) 0.11 0.81 0.13 � file://C:�Documents%20and%20Settings\curtis.rowe�I,ocal%20Settings\Temp\u2k32B.tmp 7/12/2005 � Two-Way Stop Control Page 2 of 2 _ Control Dela slveh 8.4 22.6 10.8 LOS A C B Approach delay __ __ 18.9 _ s/veh Approach LOS -- -- C HCSZOOOTM CopyrigM�2003 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved Version 4.1d file://C:�Documents%20and%20Settings\curtis.rowe�L,ocal%20Settings\Temp\u2k32B.tmp 7/12/2005 Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 2 — TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY . e '� �- �.. . . . .._�'� h�i �.t r �I��i i! � N�°:�i� '� #c , F � N� �� .s+� F,'� i � �t �;.t L .r.�-� � � ' � �!��'�x� x , �..,,.:: ,,, �'� � � ��"�� a� ,i — Analyst CDR Intersection SH-66& Temporary Access Agency/Co. Kimley-Horn Jurisdiction Weld County, CO Date Performed 7/12/2005 Analysis Year 2006 — Analysis Time Period Total PM Peak Pro'ect Descri tion SH-66 Kum & Go _ EasUWest Street: SH-66 North/South Street: Tem ora Access Intersection Orientation: East-West Stud Period hrs : 0.25 . . �r„„_.. ,.: � ,. . _ Ma'or Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R _ Volume veh/h 0 453 68 39 446 0 Peak-hourfactor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate 0 476 71 41 469 0 veh/h — Proportion of heavy vehicles, PH� � � -- 10 — -- Median type Undivided " RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 1 1 0 Configuration TR L T — U stream Si nal 0 0 MinorStreet Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 68 0 39 0 0 0 Peak-hourfactor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 — Hourly Flow Rate �1 0 41 0 0 0 veh/h Proportion of heavy — vehicles, PH� 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent grade (%) 0 0 Flared approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized? 0 0 , Lanes 1 0 1 0 0 0 Configuration L R _ Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L L R —� Volume, v (vph) 41 71 41 Capacity, cm(vph) 983 239 566 v/c ratio 0.04 0.30 0.07 Queue length (95%) 0.13 1.20 0.23 file://C:�Documents%20and%20Settings\curtis.rowe�L,ocal%20Settings\Temp\u2k324.tmp 7/12/2005 _ Two-Way Stop Control Page 2 of 2 _ Control Dela s/veh 8.8 26.3 11.9 LOS A D 8 Approach delay s/veh -- -- 21.0 Approach LOS -- -- C HCS1000TM Copyrighl m 2003 Oniversity of Fbrida,All Rights Reserved Version 4.1d file://C:�Documents%20and%20Settings\curtis.rowe�I,ocal%20Settings\Temp\u2k324.tmp 7/12/2005 APPENDIX F Peak Hour Signal Warrant Kimley-Horn andAssaciates, Inc. 067951.002/SH-66 Kum f�Go _I��' - � w w � � ' � w o � � o� � � � ��' QM � �� o � - O � o � � � ❑� o X � � cn o X � .-\ Q w N � CO — � � Q N C� O O J W � � Z W o C,� L � J Q O � O — Q � O J � _ � > LL Y � � Q > X c� O O � � `� O I v o � � � i i 0 ; N z z I N � � C� �j Q a O � � a� - � Q w w � o' a ° " > o O °C z O � a U � _ o Q � o � _ � � i � w �, - Y 0 w � � = m � � Q � o cn ,� F- � uJ J � cv o � -a a — � � � o � � � , � o O O d O � � L � � ('7 Q N � �'�' �oz �� N�Q ZO O w W W O~W � O � � � N O H Q � � � a Q w� O � � tt - Si � T O 0 D U �az Q Q � � '� � � � a ' � = O O og� L L � ina � � a �� a o � O O� N //� Q � L N Q W VJ O � � � KVIK V � � � � r Z V1 U — J = _ -' � go �" } � � w � oo� � �_ � � � � W ws ¢ � Z O O O O M a Q- � � � � " w o0 �c � � N � � � a;w L � � V7 �+�- � E c0 _ F � C d � c0 p p C I a a 3 � o � O � � = W a i o � N N � � s a� o U Hdn — H�vobddv 3wmon H�iH � � X } o a� � N N X } o a s i33als boNiw - a � � — 1��2�1S ab'�W � � w s = o . �, — Final Drainage and Erosion Control Study for Kum & Go#913 — Weld County, Colorado October 31, 2006 Prepared For: Kum&Go L. C. 6400 Wes[own Parkway Wes[Des Moines,Iowa 50266 Prepared By: � NORTFIERN ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC. 200 S.College,Suite 100 Fort Collins,Coloredo 80524 Phone:(970)221-4158 Fax:(970)221-4159 — Project Numbec 177-001.01 � � N 0 RT H E R N ADDRESS: PHONE:970.221.4158 y�EBSITE: E N G I N E E R I N G 200 S.College Ave.Suite 100 FortCollins,C080524 FAX:970.221.4159 WWWnorthemengineering.com October 31, 006 Weld County Public Warks Department "� 1111 H Street P.O. Box 758 Greeley, Colorado 80632 ^ RE: Kum & Go#913 Weld County, Colorado Project Number: 177-001.01 — Dear Staff: Northern Engineering Services, Inc. is pleased to submit this Final Drainage Report for Kum & Go #913 far your review. We understand that review by Weld County is to assure general _ compliance with standardized criteria contained in the Weld Countv Storm DrainaQe Criteria. If you should have any questions oc comments as you review this report, please feel free to contact me at your convenience. Sincerely, � NORTHERN ENGIN RING SERVICES, INC. i ^ Kimber all, E.I. Project Engineer Table of Contents VICINITY MAP Page � I. Introduction � I.I Objective � L2 Mapping and Surveying 0 II. Site Lacation and Descriotion 0 2.l Site Location 0 — 2.2 Existing Site Description 2 III. Historic Drainaee 1 � 3.I Historic Drainage 1 IV. References and Desian Criteria 3 _ 4.l References 3 4.2 Hydrologic Criteria 3 V. Develoaed Drainaee 2 — 5.1 Proposed Site Improvements 2 5.2 General Description of Flow Routing 4 53 Detention 3 — 5.4 Rainfall Erosion Control Plan 3 5.5 Water Quality 5 — VI. Conclusions 5 6.1 Compliance with Standards 5 _ VII. References 6 Appendices APPENDIX A: Onsite Runoff(Rational Method) APPENDIX B: Approved Drainage Report for Lyons 66 Pacific Commeme Park I hereby certify that this report for the final drainage design of Kum & Go #913 was prepared by me (or under my direct supervision) i� accordance with the provisions of the Weld County storm " drainage criteria far the owners thereof. ^ � �\p\\\\\111111�11�11"/�//i///�j/� Registered Professiona Engineer `�\�,o�`P'��iu�;v STF9F% _ �o;',�e ,,;�, o� ��. -� ,:. , � � ;�. � State of Colorado No. 27362 ` ;� �73�'e� °'; � - ; :,�__ _ �q; i�� . /PO. . •``„\; �%/,� '��('p��oa.�!'�.�'\\ /��//%//G I(�IIIP'1,;``,\\"; , ��y�r? � ►�"`' F'"�".y l�.�e ' . 'I�C , "� _ .+� I � "�� 1 � � ' �:� �-r�� _ � �� , i r,�� , ---�-�----� ; � - �i �; i - i � .. � � �=:L �'��,� __� � ��; � i" � 5r G �I \ C4 L_ � . � .. _...�� _ ..1� � ��-��.��. � �) � � � . � � i 1.-. �j'I @y�1�ii►"a ,> .,. j � � �! . t...--r=--- � 4 r T --- _ � � . . � �F,, I � v � s . ' � ^7 � , � II , I � � _ , _� --', 1_ L t I _...--- I _ ,— � � T �—r--� �-r---- i . � Y � �y � � � tt t"'�.rl� ' � ' � �-�'�� L �-- .,-e.�.J,, l j � � � T 'I � -r `r�`-��`-"r '�,_.� ,, y r ��*=�('�) � ��° ,, . � ' w: I f � � �( �I f 4�...�._...� � (h �4�___�I t ' . � I � ! � � � � I� . I I � Yt � -- � �lf`--�I�`�� I }____ -s.ir.� --1. M1�� . " � , �y.i - _, _-�. � . i ;i1 �N4�`=.,.�� .. ,� . I:� � � ' 5 I ,r� ��h r . 1� � L . �� .1"'J; � 1�...-_ `�I � ,, �� , �"��E f , � , ��, i �k � d� ' i I � I ___��__,.,____r-------- 1 � � �� Final Drainage and Erosion Control Study for "� Kum & Go#913 Fort Collins, Colorado _ October 31, 2006 - I. Introduction 1.1 Obiective � This report summarizes the results of final storm drainage analysis for Kum & Go #913. The drainage system for Kum & Go #913 has been designed to safely convey up — to the 100-year design storm per Weld County Criteria and discharge at or below allowable release rates. — L2 Mapning and Survevina Topography of the site with a contour interval of one-foot was prepared by Northem " Engineering Services. Northern Engineering Services, Inc. surveyed the site in November 2005. ` II. Site Location and Description _ 2.1 Site L,ocation The proposed Kum & Go #913 site is located in the northwest quarter ('/a) of Section _ 26, Township 3 North, Range 68 West of the 6th Principal Meridian in Weld County, Colorado. More specifically, the site is located at the southeast comer of the intersection of Interstate 25 and Colorado State Highway 66 at Mead, Colorado in the _ Lyons 66 Pacific Commerce Park Subdivision, it is Lot 1 of said subdivision. Currently, this site consists of unutilized open land supporting native grasses and other ,r vegetation. This development is not contained within any 100-year flood zones. 2.2. Existing Site Description " In the existing conditions, this property contains no structures and generally slopes from northeast to southwest at slopes ranging from 1%o to 4%. — There is an existing irrigation Iateral that runs adjacent to the site; the right to abandon this lateral has been purchased by a separate party. The site is bound by future I-25 Frontage Road to the east, future Pacific Circle to the south, Colorado State Highway 66 to the north and Lot 2 of Lyons 66 Pacific Commerce Park to the West. Existing utilities serving the site include an 8" sanitary sewer line running north/south _ along the east property boundary and a multitude of utilities along the south side of Highway 66, including several dry utilities and a 2" water line. There are severai utilities proposed with the development of Lyons 66 Pacific Commerce Park, including , a 16" waterline to run parallel to the existing 8" sanitary sewer line along the east edge of the site. The design of the waterline has been completed; a portion of the line is to be constructed to serve the Kum & Go #913 site. A temporary connection to the _ existing 2" waterline will serve to circulate the water until the rest of the 16" waterline is constructed with the future development of Lyons 66 Pacific Commerce Park. It is our intent to follow the approved utility designs for Lyons 66 Pacific Commerce Park. According to the Soil Survey of Larimer County Area, Colorado prepared by the United States Department of Agriculture Soil Conservation Service and Forest Service — in cooperation with Colorado Agricultural Experiment Station issued December 1980, this site consists mostly of hydrologic soil group `B.' III. Historic Drainaee — 31 Historic Drainaee In the historic conditions, the site conveys rainwater via overland flow from northeast '- to southwest. There are no existing drainage features on site. Runoff, once off-site, would be intercepted by the concrete irrigation ditch and conveyed downstream. It should be noted that historic flows are not calculated with this report as those '� calculations are included in the approved drainage report for Lyons 66 Pacific Commerce Park, included in the appendix for reference. The flows allowed to be released from this site are determined by the master plan of the subdivision set forth in ' the Final Drainage Report for Lyons 66 Pacific Commerce Park. N References and Desi n Criteria � 41 References Drainage criteria outlined in both the Weld Countv Storm Drainaee Criteria and the Urban Storm Drainaee Criteria Manual, Urban Drainage and Flood Control District, Wright Water Engineers, Denver, Colorado, June 2001 have been referenced in the _ preparation of this study. Additional information from the Final Drainaee Report Lvons 66 Pacific Commecce Park Weld County, Colorado prepared by Swift and Associates dated February 7, 2004, sealed Apri19, 2004. _ 4.2 Hvdrolo�c Criteria The Rational Method was used to determine runoff rates iu accordance with the Weld _ County Storm Drainage Criteria. The design rainfall intensities were based on Rainfall Intensity Curve Data prescribed , by Boulder County for Zone 1. The intensity curve table has a five (5) minute time increment. The intensities were interpolated to determine approximate intensities on one (1) minute time steps. In accordance with the Weld Counry Design Criteria, the 5- _ year, 10-year and 100-year storm events were analyzed for this proposed development. In calculating the time of concentration for the rainfall intensities, the procedures — outlined in the Urban Storm Drainage Criteria Manual were used. The runoff coefficients in the Rational Method were based on Table RO-5 of the — Urban Drainage and Flood Control District Drainage Criteria Manual. — V Developed Draina�e 5.1 Pro�sed Site Improvements In the proposed conditions, there will be a Kum & Go convenience store and gas pumps covered by a canopy constructed on site. The permanent access to this '— development will be from Pacific Circle. Two entrances to Pacific Circle will be constructed, both 40' wide, one shared with Lot 2, the other solely for Lot 1. The temporary access will serve Kum & Go #913 until the relocated East Frontage Road ' and Pacific Circle are constructed. CDOT will construct the East Frontage Road and improvements to Hwy 66; the date of construction is undetermined at this time. Pacific Circle will be constructed with Phase 2 of Lyons 66 Pacific Commerce Park. — The site will have 17 total parking spaces, and features wide areas for circulation between the pumps and the store. Utility improvements will be limited to providing services to the building. "— 5.2 General Description of Flow Routing This development is contained within the Lyons 66 Pacific Commerce Park — Subdivision; the drainage for this lot was master-planned with that subdivision. Flows are conveyed via surface drainage generally from northeast to southwest to curb and gutter or concrete pans. When Pacific Circle is constructed, the runoff will be � conveyed to Pacific Circle, where they are transported via curb and gutter to a I S' Type R inlet and eventually conveyed to the subdivision's detention pond. [n the _ interim condition, concentrated and surface flows will be directed south toward Pacific Circle. The concentrated flows from the parking lot will pass through a curb cut to a rock channel. The channel will slow and spread the flows to prevent erosion of the _ undeveloped land. The master plan allowed for each site to be 70.5% impervious. The proposed Kum & Go #913 site is 72.6% impervious, very close to the assumed value. As the Kum & Go #913 site is in compliance with the master plan conditions, _ no additional drainage mitigation measures will be necessary to bring the site to acceptable conditions. ^ 5.3 Detention _ In the southeast portion of the subdivision, a detention pond is to be constructed to accommodate storage volumes required to physically reduce runoff rates to historic rates after development of the subdivision occurs. This pond will be constructed prior , to the completion of construction for Kum & Go #913. Piease reference the Final Drainage Report for Lyons 66 Pacific Commerce Park within the Appendix for further information. 5.4 Rainfall Erosion Control Plan — The proposed rainfall erosion control plan during construction will consist of temporary structural erosion control measures. Silt fencing will be installed at the locations where sediment is expectant to convey to offsite locations. Gravel inlet — protection will be installed at the two curb cut openings; cobble channels will slow runoff from the curb openings. — Vegetative erosion control consisting of straw mulch with temporary seeding must be used on all open space areas that are disturbed with this project. It will be clearly noted on the plans that no soils shall remain exposed for more than thirty days before — requiring temporary or permanent erosion control measures, unless approved by Weld County. All temporary erosion control structures are to remain in p►ace until permanent vegetation has been established. 5.5 Water Ouality ' The water quality portion of the pond has been designed with Final Drainage Report for Lyons 66 Pacific Commerce Park; please reference the report within the appendix for further information. _ VI. Conclusions 6.1 Compliance with Standards � This Final drainage analysis has been performed according to design criteria found in the Storm Drainage Criteria, Weld County, Colorado, dated January 2006 and the _ Urban Storm Drainaee Criteria Manual, Urban Drainage and Flood Control District, Wright Water Engineers, Denver, Colorado, September 1999. This analysis also conforms to the approved Lyons 66 Pacific Commerce Park drainage report. VII. References l. Storm Drainage Criteria, Weld County, Colorado, January, 2006. 2. Urban Storm DrainaQe Criteria Manual, Wright Water Engineers, Denver, Colorado, September 1999. 3. Final Drainage Report Lyons 66 Pacific Commerce Park, Swifr and Associates, February 7, 2004/Apri19, 2004. i � � o � m ° N � � _ _ N � ' lD 0.� V V lD ^ '° M � O O O O O � � ' 0 � � � � �[ O � � � y So � E 1 lD lD N N ln y � W V � � � � � 0 � rn V � m 0 N � .�{ �J O N N � > 1 N � - - � V ,^ �:. �$2��.� O 0000 L _ � ., � �Q � `wl � � � 1p h N N N � t ` � N uiO O V �U V � , �. O O O O O -,� � 'o � � _ � ^ E_ ' "� p �� e° b° E° y O - � O O � c O O p N O O N N � � r � � - r O � � � 0� � _ � N u - � � � U � @ � N lD O LIl (�1 � W � g000 � � q o - - � ��' Z` E _ mvm � � A ��:. �aooao ;, u � � � 5 a m � ` " L m � o o` P y N Q y� b C � g � 1UL a �7E. ocoov o � _ o ,� +� . 00000 o � � :o 0 0 0 0 � v � `o ,. � `o m � m O � � � � � � i � � � v - h O O � �E � � - O O O � o q o O - 0 0 ` i ' . � � N � � . �{ Y � g °� � Q �i 3 � _ p ~ � s 6 � � @ � °� m t� O N V � '� _ N _ � N m � ` � � O - O O � O o ` � N � � ' � � o `m � � y „ °' : 3 ° N � EE v N !� a A �'- (1 � � u � l+ v p � 0 ^ q m U . �¢ - N ttl V � U � = i�f Q U u�' K e� N U o � Q Q Q Q _ H W a � u N 3 � o � ^ � 3 2 w v o 0 p � � E � m � � O a m N m - ^ a - o m o � N _ � y' 9 �' O N O O � E O 'G JI� _ — _ � � � � F d c io v m r Ut 0 � p � E lD al K1 m 0 � V y � � 5 V 2 a a a a V � @ z z z z .� '^ > V' Fj� m O S O O O � b � O O O O � � � > � N O O O O g� O O O O � N O, ` v g,� O O O O Oy � � a � aa � E z — z z � W Z' O V O O v � � ) � O 4l O O � � �- o Noo > N � o O o 0 O �� o <voo W _ � y� aNao N _ � 2 io m m n V � E �p n �n ttl � y � m � O O Q � �� N � '� g V cv v� O W N — _ � C � J O — � r m O O y O �C cv m (v cv c � — o '^ .. _ S s o � 9 Y CU c n U A y O C � � � � � O N N � � � U ^ � O � Q � o 0 0 0 U w o N u ] U .� p . � � o� � � 4 3 3 II � � ° � � � � O H U p 6 � � � Q 'm a a ¢ ¢ U I � w � � m 3 �. _ ° y � i+ �, p _ �u > � � 3 3 � � '^ 3 � ~ - � N w � � a \ + w o � F m � j-�' c m� � y II � N II � u m " � � ry m a .. 3 � [" u� r" � � > > `op � 0 8 m a v n � a � o m o 0 � o ^ in n c� N O mo � o '� ovoo - N m - � — � o m � v m - o � o � a '� omoo � U � � � �� 3 ��n rcl N O O � � T� O N O O � 8 2 m � O O � � '^ — — — VJ Z O � o € � � � d� QV � lD N I� h � N ^ i➢ O V V � � - m n n N � ifl V N N O � N ^ l0 N N Lfl � € t9 O O O � � ,= m m v v � � 8 m �n _ _ _ w N v v � U O O O O � � o N V — — ` - l0 lD N N L� U O O O O � � �O O N N V � � � a{ O O O O — � O � �o n <v cv U �n �n O O '6 O O O O � c �D v O O � � E lD m ul �n O m K — � `o_ O v N N � a � m � o �n o �u O N w � u `v >. N � 0 - 0 O 6 � �� Q �` o U � > U � '�, a� � 3 . II � ° o' � 0 � �. U � m � �- c — ni m v 7�i G ¢ ¢ a I � W o � U O '� � — " p r '� U'� t3 � a lD + � " `� w `n �' T+ rn O J H II II II .� � � O o� - a m v � � N H � > > � Broad-Crested Weir: ,� Pro�ect: Kum � Go #9 I 3 Pro�ect # I 77-00 I Design Point: I — Governing Equations: If the weir is long in the direction of flow so that the flow leaves ihe weir in essentially a horizontal direction,the weir is a broad- crested weir. Feference 1)"Hydraulic Engineering,Roberson,Cassidy&Chaudhry.,John W iley&Sons, 1995,pg 212)' Q=0.385�il�2g�"'��Z _ 'where O is flow rate in CFS "where C is rallo ol acNal discharge to fheorefical discharge. A value oi C can be obtained from Figure 4-36 of Relerence 1. 'where L is the crest length of the weir(FTJ 'where H is the height o�flow over the crest(F� ^ 'where P is Me vertical distance irom weir crest to pondlchannel invert(FT) Broad-Createtl Welr Coeffielent(C) � ios � ...._...._ .t . _ _ i �"' � '_____. ..—_ .� L'. ; �.� . U ues 1 __ — _ ' — iy . � — 1 - , ...-,...m-..r„�` as i � H � a� � � .. P ' BFd0AD—CREHTED 0 oz o� as o.e i IfSIR W(H+P) �' . .. , .. , Valld I/0.1<WL<0.6 Input Parameters: _ Length (L)= 2.00 FT Crest Elevation = 4984.88 FT "In the case of a curb opening, P=0 Upstream Invert Elevation= 4984.88 FT - De th vs. Flow: Depth Above Eievation F�oW CHECK � Crest(ft) (ft) W(H+P) C �f$ H/L 0.00 4984.88 1.00 1.31 0.00 INVALID 0.10 4984.98 1.00 1.31 0.26 INVALID _ 020 4985.08 1.00 1.31 0.72 INVALID 023 4985.11 1.00 1.31 0.90 � Q�� 0.116 0.30 4985.18 1.00 1.31 1.33 0.150 0.40 4985.28 1.00 1.31 2.05 0.200 � 0.50 4985.38 1.00 1.31 2.86 To of Curb 0.250 Q,�=0.9 CFS (Basin A7) Broad-Crested Weir: _ Pro�ect: Kum � Go #9 I 3 Pro�ect # I 77-00 I Design Point: 2 - Governin Equations: If the weir is long in the direction of flow so that the flow leaves the weir in essentially a horizontal direction,the weir is a broad- crested weir. Reference 1)"Hydraulic Engineering,Roberson,Cassidy&Chaudhry.,John Wiley&Sons, 1995,pg 212)" Q=o.sssCL�z��2 � 'where Q is llow rate in CFS 'where C is ratio o/actual discharge to theoreNcal discharge. A value of C can be obtained from Figure 4-36 O/Relerence 1. "where L is the crest length of the weir(FT) 'where H is the height ol flow over the crest(FT) "where P is the veRical distance lrom weir crest to pondlchannel invert(FT) Broatl-Crested Weir Coefflelent(C) � i.os � -.._._.� . _._-_.--_ .. ..__..._.... _ ' - - - - �� `a� p ass - � , �-_ _ �t�,� 0.9 � �_ _ . � . , . �'_��',r1 � H ' .� , P 2{ g(dpA�CRESTLD `. o es IISIR a Oz oa ac oe i W(HrP) , . , , , ., .. .. Valid i/0.1<WL<0.8 Input Parameters: Length (L)= 4.00 FT Crest Elevation = 4979.85 FT "In the case of a curb openmg, P=0 Upstream Invert Elevation= 4979.85 FT - De th vs. Flow: Depth Above Elevation Flow CHECK _ Crest(ft) (ft) W(H+P) C �}$ H/L 0.00 4979.85 1.00 1.31 0.00 INVALID 0.10 4979.95 1.00 1.31 0.51 INVALID 0.20 4980.05 1.00 1.31 1.45 INVALID 0.30 4980.15 1.00 1.31 2.66 INVALID 0.40 498025 1.00 1.31 4.10 INVALID 0.46 4980.31 1.00 1.31 5.10 � Q�o 0.116 '� 0.50 4980.35 1.00 1.31 5.73 Top of Curb 0.125 0.60 4980.45 1.00 1.31 7.53 0.150 0.69 4980.54 1.00 1.31 9.20 � �1�00 0.171 - Q�o=4.7 CFS, Q��=9.2 CFS (Basin A2) " The Qepth above crest for Q I 00 is conservabvely high, calculated as such that the curb he,ight reaches 0.69'. In actuality, the curb is only 0.5' tall, the Flow wdl spread and over top the curb before reachmg a depth of 0.69'. Swift and Associates �— Town Planning � Urban Design � Civil Engineering , - FINAL DRAINAGE REPORT ' LYONS 66 PACIFIC COMNiERCE PARK _ WELD COLJNTY, COLORt�DO I I hereby certify ttiat this drainage report(plan)for the Snal drainage design of Lyons 66 Pacific — Commerce Park,Weld County, Colorado,was prepared by me(or under my direct supervision)in accordance with the r ' of the Stonn Drainage Design and Technical Criteria Regulations in Section 10.13 of ihe Wel 'on Ordinance for the owners thereof. — o�� dW�:�lF�F ,,•. 9 ; ... John J. .E.,No. 3(�6 lo i .�`�.••1��-a 7i'��tr ��w�� S��N E��'� PREPARED FOR: ' 66 Pacific,LLC '� 1210 Commerce CouR,Unit#36 Lafayette,Colorado 80026 , — October 9,2000 August 20, 2003 Febnrary 7,2004 � 421 21°`,Suite 212,Longmont,Co,80501 (303)772-7052;FAX 851-7226 Introduction: The subject property is located in the NW '/< of the NW Y<of Section 26, Townsiup 3 North, Ranee 68 West of the 6`°P.M. The site contains a total of 35.0 t acres, more€€rf — less. The property is currently going through the subdivision process in the county to subdivide the property into 15 commercial /light industrial lots varying in size from 1 _ acre to 3 acres more or less. The property is presently undeveloped and bound by I-25 to the west, Highway 66 to the _ north, a John Deere Dealership to the east and the Rademacher farm to the south. The existing site is not currently being utilized. The improvements on the ro consist of P pertY a private irrigation lateral and a storm water conveyance from I-25. As part of this _ development, the I-25 conveyance will be realigned, but wiil continue to serve its existing function. The right to abandon the irrigation lateral has been purchased. _ The property is approximately l Y2 miles north of the St Vrain Creek. Mulligan Reservoir and Foster Reservoir are each about YZ mile to the west. The drainage from this property eventually reaches the St. Vrain Creek to the south. The inigation lateral that bounds the — west and part of the northem boundary characterizes the property. This ditch is constructed as a flat concrete lined ditch but separates the highway drainage (both I-25 and Highway 66) from the properry drainage. The site slopes from the northwest corner — down to the southeast corner at less than 1.0%. The site also slopes up from the northwest corner to both the southwest and northeast corners: The I-25 drainage ditch is the low point in the properry and traverses from the west to southeast property lines. Tlus — concrete lined ditch is fed from a 24 inch RCP from under the frontage road and the adjacent ROW. , — The site is not in the 100 year flood zone. The proposed development consists of IS commercial/light industrial lots and the , — associated access roads and utilities. Because of the size and location of the property, the ' rational method has been used to determine historic and developed runof�'rates. " Drainage Design: HISTORIC—For purposes of examining the eacisting condition on site,the property has — been e�camined as a whole. A historic(exisring)time of concentraUon of 53.37 minutes was derived and the Intensity Frequency Duration curves prescribed by Boulder County for Region 1 were used to determine the rainfall intensity. The curves published by , — Boulder County were created using the method described by Urban Drainage and Flood Control and this property is in close enough pro�mity to the applicable region that the _ curves are deemed adequate. This analysis reveals the following historic flow rates 5-vear historic 10-year historic 100-year historic _ 5.32 cfs 12.95 cfs 41.31 cfs 421 21°`,Suke 212,LongmoM,Co,80501 (303)772-7052;FAX 651-7226 _ (See appendix A). Additionally, there are off-site contributions from a sliver of highway 66 near the northeast comer of the site, along with severa] acres of the adjacent John Deere dealership. Drainage from this area will be accepted in its existing state and _ quantity, with the understanding that any improvements to the John Deere site would require detention and release at these existing rates. This drainage will be routed through the site and detention faciliry, however it will not be detained, as it is simply of�site pass _ through. A second off-site pass through situarion occurs with the CDOT I-25 drainage that enters — the site. Near the mid-point of the western property line,a 24"RCP enters the site from a series of drainage inlets that capture median drainage from I-25. It appeazs that the basin to this pipe includes ali of the I-25 ROW for a YZ mile to the north and approximately'/< — mile to the south as well as the north and south ROW of State Highway 66 from I-25 to the eastem boundary of the subject property. Currently,URS Corporation has been contracted by the drainage division of CDOT to eatamine the drainage situation in this — ai'ea as part of the I-25 widening project. After discussing the situation with Pieter Van Ry of URS, 2 important pieces of information came to light. First, the exact drainage area that contributes to this outlet pipe is in question and second, because of the need to lower ' I-25 as part of the aew widening,the ouflet will become obsolete. Because CDOT could not provide exact information regarding the highway drainage in this azea, the I-25 ROW _ drainage was determined by the 24 inch outlet pipe being the limiting factor. It would be possible for water to pond in the ROW area above the inlet to a depth of 4980.10 feet (before it would overtop adjacent banks). Utilizing ttris information, and HY8 culvert _ design software it was determined that the maximum theoretical capacity of the outlet pipe is approximately 43.00 cfs. (See Appendix B) Much of the I-25 ROW drainage infrastructure was in disrepair with pipes being silted full and crushed in some instances. _ This value will be very conservative as compared to the actual flows. My discussions with URS also revealed plans on the part of CDOT to increase the flow to _ this conveyance in the future. It is not the responsibility of this site to accept any flows greater than the existing historic condition. Regardless, the lowering of I-25 with the widening project wili require this conveyance to be lowered in the future. Due to the _ exceedingly flat nature of the site, this lowering will require that the conveyance "chase grade"downstream and of�site. While it would be beneficial to both CDOT and the developer of this site to work together on this future solution and to share the associated _ costs Mr. Van Ry made it cleaz that the timing of tlus work and design on the part of CDOT would be well into the future. The conclusion to this situarion then is that the developer of this project will preserve the existing CDOT drainage conveyance by _ rerouting it through the site at his cost. In the future, CDOT may find need to remove and replace the conveyance. If so, they will have to do so at their cost. _ DEVELOPED- Calculation of developed flows has been performed for the property as a whole, in order to size the required detention facility. (See Appendix A). T'he following are the developed flow anticipated for the site and assume that the enrire site, less _ required landscape areas, will be covered with hard surface (roof or asphalt). 421 21",Suite 212,Longmont,Co,80501 (303)772-7052;FAX 651-7226 _ STREET CAPACITY— The capacity of the two streets has been analyzed at critical locations designated by the design points on the drainage plan. The purpose of this check is to insure both the ability of the sVeet to convey the minor storm as wel( as the quantity _ of flow that will be intercepted by the inlets. The results of this analysis can be reviewed in appendix B. CULVERTS -CDOT is currently undertaking a drainage study in this area relating to the I-25 widening project. Preliminary results provided by CDOT's consultant, URS, shows an intention to alter the existing drainage pattems in the area and an anticipated upsizing — of the 24"pipe that brings their drainage into the site to a 54"pipe. Along with this enlazgement of the pipe comes greater than existing flows. Ciearly this change is not consistent with the e�usting(historic)drainage patterns in the area, and the final results of — this study may well indicate other plans. As explained above, this development is currently planning to accommodate the exisrrng flow for this scenario by rerouting the I- 25 drainage ditch that passes across the site to a location along the west and south — property lines. T'he ditch will be piped for some 850' followed by 1000' of concrete lined ' ditch (See Appendix D for concrete ditch design information). This drainage flow is only to be passed through the site, and will not be detained. All conveyances associated with " this drainage will be kept separate from the site conveyances and detention facility. (See ' Appendix C for all culvert design information). '— Additionally, several culverts across the site carry drainage from inlet to inlet or to ditches. Theses culverts have been analyzed by use of HY8 culvert design software or Eagle Point Storm Sewer design software. The data that pertains to each pipe has a file — name that consist of the culvert# preceded by Davis (e.g. DAVIS 1 pertains to culveR Cl). DTTCHES—T'here aze 3 ditches that wnvey drainage along common lot lines. The ' location of these ditches can be seen on the drainage map. 'These ditches accept both surface flows, as well as inlet discharge and carry those flows to the detention pond. All , ditches aze proposed as"V" shape ditches with 4:1 side slopes. The only exception to this is the concrete lined ditch along the south properiy line that serves to carry the CDOT _ flows across the site. The flow in this concrete lined ditch is simply a"pass-through" , from off-site upstream to off-site downstream, and as such it is not passed through the detention pond. (Ditch calculations can be found in Appendix D.) EROSION CONTROL-Several measures aze proposed for the control of erosion. Silt fence is proposed along all property lines downstream from disturbed areas. Staked hay _ bales are proposed at appropriate intervals along the drainage ditches. Permanent riprap is shown at culvert inlets and outlets, as well as at ditch intersections to control scour. _ WATER QUALTTY—Storm water quality management will be achieved through the use ' of the retention portion of the pond. Suspended particles will settle out from the retained stormwater and a regular maintenance program for removal of sedimentation will be _ required of the subdivision association. �. 421 27",Suite 212,Longmont,Co,80507 (303)P2-7052;FAX 651-7226 ^ The selected structural Best Management Practice (BMP) is that of a"Retention Pond Sedimentation Facility." For the Water Quality design, an assumed m�imum site imperviousness of 80%has been utilized. This imperviousness yields a required Water '- Quality Capture Volume of 46,347 cu ft, well within the wnfines of the retention portion of the pond. Water Quality calculations can be found•at the end of Appendix A. ' Coaclusion: ^ T'he information and design provided within complies with the standards as outlined in ' the Storm Drainage Design and Technical Criteria Regulations in Section 10.13 of the _ Weld County Subdivision Ordinance and the Urban Drainage and Flood Control District Design Manual. The proposed development of this site poses no adverse impact on up or down stream development or drainage ways. � ► 421 21�,Suke 212,LongmoM,Co,80501 (303)772-7052;FAX 651-7226 i " APPENDIX A ,' i � 427 27a,Suite 212,Longmoirt,Co,80501 (303)772-7052;FAX651-7226 � s Tta tC��'4 ..,;�. �` p,§4'.-E*r �ab�.t � J<<� ' � � n� Fx� s}� t�.k x . �� - b.�v� �` s fi'W�Rff ,:¢a� �`.�� i��€ ��_ x �pi.�'r"w � ' � BASIN:ALL(UNDEVELOPED) 7�QUNOFF COEFFICIENTS-UNDEVELOPED Su�/oce Mea qrea FREDUENCY Type feaee) 2 5 10 100 � Tabl 35.01 100 HerC Surf 0.00 0.00 0.87 0.87 0.86 0.89 Gtp9 95.07 100.00 0.05 0.7 01 O4 GmvN 0.00 0.00 0.15 025 0.35 0.85 Roo( 0.00 0.00 0.8 0.85 0.8 0.B � �� 0�� 0.00 0.B7 0.88 0.8 0.B3 � Talals 35.01 WENiHTED 0.06 !':0:10 6.20 .`:. dA0 ^. � STOWCRUNOFFCOEFFICIENTS ::c�aa_.. .. .....rn�.a� i a.TME OF CONCENTRATION ^ UNDEVELOPEDBASIN � MfMLTRAVELqSTANCE < � . INfTIALSLOPE % � ^ 57FtEET 7RAVELpSTANCE 1280 ' STREETSLOPE 0.5 . GRWNDTYPE rlbw VELOCRY 7.8 ^ Initiel Ti� 7. 1A 5 = q025 min ',, 5"CS 3•� S4wttt. LROJ 73.73min usEnr�oFr.o�cexriumir�s a ssa�wu � INFALL INTENSITIES � �wm�pnnmamezuie�rowrenM .aemw; Ea.(�1 r.,�wM<er�l . , Ea.R) wn•W4`�9Yac) . �R Z�� 10 YMr 700 Yar 1 . A tJ0]! 200te H.6H3 �. B 16.8[.'W u.1T6 -0.q1 C. 3�T13SZ1 1EW.60] -13.008 r"2 nan oes� � , �rum ru�s � �x - �tAejnmr I5� :137 kulrc � 110� . �Y�6LN(r. fl00. T':2�.06ililhr... . W(. Jii� i.P�+,K RUNOFF RATES-UNpEVELQPEp o.an .., os- eaz ers aio- izas�rs moo- u;a, c�s . � �"F �,�'('�L �L r'� } �t ,�°' .� .' '�,y�.'l��}�"2�,�, "m E,�"�'+,t�v. �`�"+s�`X+i ..'L y� i : . � y�..S g�_ � � � � ;a r � r't a �4at ,�� '�. �� ' k � =, ��ri" `i .� �u � 3 > �'^' . , .� � �a „� � , ��'� � ., t � ,s�.. . '� � ,��. � , � �� ,, „ � ..w; BASIN: ALL DEVELOPED 'rUNOFF COEFFICIENTS-0EVELOPED Surtaca Nea Area FREQUENCV � TY� f��) % 2 5 10 100 Total 35.01 100 Nard Surt 18.37 52.48 0.87 0.87 0.88 0.&9 O� 10.� 29.52 0.05 0.1 02 0.4 � Grovel 0.00 0.00 0.75 0.25 0.35 0.85 I R°°f 6�� 17.89 0.8 0.85 0.9 0.9 ' �°� 0.� 0.00 0.87 0.88 0.9 0.93 _ Totals 35.01 WEIGHiE6 0.82 . D.&t -:� 0.88 -O�:76 ::� ;:Y13TORIC RUNOFF COEFFICIENTS r:.0 �,�i _ i ,—,,,j�,' �LI-L .a ,`�C100� Oi4 _ ��a,aL I �,am_� _ SZ_�I"77o ��,9q�� •' ��ME OF CONCENTRATION "�F ('�'''"� � �.�.�lv �- ^ DEVELOPED BASIN ;pr:,� _ (DU �� . .�b-]�.t: _ � INITULL TRAVEL DISTANCE �500' Qp� 3?�2 - 5•'`.'2�`� � INITIAL SLOPE % 43 !y,-� — �p7,'1.'s`�� TRAVEL TIME DISTANCE �ri6'�f-� �� r �� TRAVEL TIME SLOPE % ��!''�"3 ?' GROUNDTVPE � vE�ociTv '��a � '� °J r��` � S�`�,)_�" F � InitiN Ti- 1.9(1.1' �-..t��,f�+ (S)"3333 � . TrevN Tt = Ugpy _ . 24.32 min . � TOTAL TIME OF CONCENTRATION - 37.57 MIN �, Ui&?f10TIME 25.06 MIN IYlIE YIM�,16f;CdN6EAiSIiATk)N IIS Ttl s '��: . • . 46:08';MIN � ' INTENSRY RATE8 i5 = YiW 7NIiG � i10= S.W≤IMU � H00= i.76�WNii' �= 3.83 , \K RUNOFF RATES-0EVELOPED �=CiA a5 = ::� f0.27�eft �� oto = +'72.4i.an ,. (��) ^ ca�oo- t24s6 ors "� ��1n`�.a P�� ^ETENTION POND DETENTION PONDINPUT BASIN:ALLDEVELOPED E�ev. Nea elev. Incc Sum Sum .ft. ste Volume Voluma De 61.0� 0.� 0.00 0.00 0 � 62.00 4757.00 1.00 5931.00 5931.00 i �.� i20B8.00 1.00 13762.00 19893.W 2 . 84.00 22528.00 1.00 24297.00 43990.00 3 �.+`.� 34878.00 1.00 37880.00 BiB70.00 4 , 88.00 48236.W 1.00 50051.00 131921.00 5 �. 67.00 75039.00 1.00 58801.00 190822.00 6 . Bb.00 84752.00 1.00 84752.0� 275574.00 7 �- 88.W 84800.00 1.00 84800.00 370174.00 8 ).FAA MASS BALANCE DETENTION STORAGE METHOD ' MASS BALANCE Q=piq Hislaic Tc= 10 min � HiaOoric C = 0.4 � HisOorici = 7.37 iNhr 10D YEAR STORM ONLY FOR ZONE I,ADAMS COUNTY . � ENTER OUTIET PIPE Q= 5.32 cfs � � ACREAGE Camposd Time of CA� � 'C' concentra6on � � 35.01 � �-- 075 25.1 2818 POND ., Minules Sewnd¢ in6enaity 707AL Outlet D'Af. , dume k^3 wlume� 5 300 8.W 74550 74.550 � 10 800 7.31 - H4,72B 3192 1N.536 � 15 900 8.04 142,183 4.788 137,405 � � 12IX1 5.25 184,784 8,384 158.410 30 1800 421 188.7L3 9,578 188,847 �- � � 2.75 2589fi2 19,152 239,810 �'. 80 5400 1.94 274 028 28 T2B 245.300 � 12(1 72p0 1.52 286,270 38.304 24�.886 7B0 10800 1.08 ?88.454 57,458 241998 , FIY47tl1AU1A tr�tlME+ � '- 11'!968 �U:FT. :, i30 Afin �f� J.Q.F"Q �'+"'-r""�N '7'"r e r+ V w („s J M'� Lyons 66 Paci�c Commerce Park — Drainage Design DEVELOPED DRAINAGE Developed Runoff Rates Q = CIA .y � J�} Fv4 ) � 1�.1��,f � eFtF �`,��yf��8 St. � . �-��Ib4'��f r.."�4��4�"Jy+, ..x.: DETENTION POND SIZING — Using the asymmetrical triangular hydrograph ' 100 year storm: V ,00 = 1.335(tc)(60)(Qd-Qh) — Q a = 124.25 cfs Q n = 0.00 cfs 'V:�bb � =.`�r48��`9��d�:; "" , FOR COMPARISON ONLY � ' USE FAA RESULTS FOR DESIGN — Developed Drainage Basin C Page 1 4/7/04 ,�- Y" � ._ L STAG E vs . STO RAG E � L LYONS 66 PACIFIC COMMERCE PARK ;►, � � 69 �� ' �._.� � �,,� 68 ��'��'��, � l � � 67 . 1 i � 66 � ' �- � H; . ; � � 65 �;;��f; �� `��'�CC`�'��`: �_�I , a. ' ` � 64 �� r � I_ � � � � o � - 6 3 ��'��:: `��r� ��,'�� ' �.._. � x � � � � " t, . � ., = . �'^,•. , .' � I_ 62 ��r�� , �� ,.�,. �. � w�� 61 ; il- 0 100000 200000 300000 40000 � �_ Volume (cu ft) � i I_ � f�� ( vR j � g � � P P l ' ^ BASIN: 50 DEVELOPED 7.RUNOFF COEFFICIENTS-DEVELOPED �� ^ �� FREQUENCY � TY� (°'°°1 % 2 5 10 700 ToW BA2 �pp , — Hfrd Surt 3.53 55.00 0.87 D.87 0.88 0.89 ' �'� 1.� 20.00 0.05 0.1 0.2 0A � ' Grovel 0.00 0.00 0.15 0.25 035 0.85 RaoF 1.81 25.00 0.8 0.85 0.9 0.9 .. � �� 0.� 0.00 0.B7 0.BB 0.9 0.93 Totals 6.42 VYEIGNTED �. O.d4 5' .U.71 .:- 0.26 6�:79 �:�. ' STORIC RUNOFF COEFFICIENTS -CYODi. O.i' a.TIME OF CONCENTRATION ' ^ DEVELOPED BASIN INITIALTRAVELDISTANCE <S0ry �5 .� INITIAL SIOPE % 2 Z TRAVEL TIME DISTANCE � 710 � TRqVEL TIME SLOPE % 0.5 GROUND TYPE GRASSED WATERWAY � VELOCITV . 1.1 '. IniON Ti= 1.8(1.7-05HLy�.5 - 8.20 min S".3333 _ I Tnvd Tt = Ll80V - 10.76 mn TOTAL TIME OF CONCENTRATION - 18.96 MIN ��i U18M10TIME - 15.74 MIN U8E71MEOCGEYNCEh71i7►YN5NA� tc :�: - r - 16.il:MIN i INTENBRV MTE8 i5 = A3i.YJM' � ito= 5:Y21nfIiV � 1700= 6.181n1A! LnX= z.aa il iK RUNOFF RATES-0EVELOPED � O=CiA ' QS = i: 1dB6.oir-:: Q70 = `�� 16:�5 tN ;'- moo= ,�. 91:82 cis; �� :2 �.. � - - BASIN: 60 DEVELOPED .tUNOFF COEFFICIENTS-0EVELOPED ^ �� e FREOUENCY �. TYPB 1�) % 2 5 10 100 Todl 2.25 . 100 � Hard Surf 1.46 85.00 0.87 0.87 0.88 O.B9 � Graea 0.23 10.00 0.05 0.1 02 0.4 �! �i1°°°� �� 0.00 0.15 025 0.35 0.85 � Roof 0.56 25.00 0.8 0.85 0.9 0.9 � �°� 0.� 0.00 0.87 O.BB 0.8 0.93 ,. Tomle 2.25 WEI6HTE0 0.77 . 0.79 :��..: D.l3 0;li -;` ISTORIC RUNOFF COEFFIGENTS . 1C1UOW pti � .iME OF CONCENTRATION ^ DEVELOPED BASIN � INITULLTRAVELDISTANCE <500' � �pp , INITULL SLOPE % Z � � 7RAVEL TIME DISTANCE �5 �, TRAVEL TIME SLOPE % 0.5 GROUND 7VPE PAVED 6 GUTTER VELOqTV � 1.5 � ImEal Ti= t.&1.1-05)(Lp.5 - 4.83 min S".3333 Trawl Tt = L/B0V � 7.50 min � TOTAL TIME OF CONCENTRATION - 12.13 MIN U1BM10TIME 14.31 MIN US67iMEbK CdYJGEMI'R0.tfON k8 7a '±. 72 i7.MIN - INTENST'RATE8 i 5 = .S.�W..INfir , . . � i10= . ."�i.3d..MNii`� .. i100= '8.82.Mi(d`, , - LnX= 2.W ii AK RUNOFF RATES-0EVELOPED a=cw � as = �:. 819.cfr:� mo = 'I:b7 �rs — moo= 12.K6 Ms` ��. ti ko` �� a:.g�� ^ BASIN: 70 DEVELOPED � IUNOFF COEFFICIENTSAEVELOPED - � Surtece Aree qrea FREQUENCY TYP° (°�"°) % 2 5 70 100 � Tdal 1.52 �pp - Hqrd Surt 0.98 85.00 0.87 0.87 0.88 0.89 Graes 0.15 10.00 0.05 0.7 02 OA � � - Gravel 0.00 0.00 0.15 0.25 0.35 0.65 � Roof 0.38 25.00 0.8 0.85 0.8 0.9 � �� 0.00 0.87 O.BB 0.8 0.93 '� Tumis 1.52 WEIGNTEQ 0.77 �� 0.79 ::�U.62 ��:Oi84 ::: ' "1STORIC RUNOFP COEFFIdENTS ��:C10M - 0.8-. � , ME OF CONCENTRATION ^ DEVELOPEDBASIN . � INRULLiRAVELDISTANCE <5pp' � INITIAL SLOPE % 2 � TRAVEL TIME DISTANCE 20 TRAVEL TIME SLOPE % 0.5 GROUND NPE PAVED&GUTfER VELOCITY 1.5 ^ IriiGel Ti= 1.8(1.1-05)(LN.5 - 8.80 min � ., - S^3933 _ � Travel Tt = L/fi0V - 0.Y2 min � � 70TAL TIME OF CONCENTRATION - 8.ffi MIN . — U18W70TIME - 12IXi MIN I USE7INIEOFGbNC�NTpl4l"iONN$ 7c + ltlt7 MIN - '�. INTENBRV RATES i 5 = l.BS:WNF iio= �I.JB Ililhr.: , '� fl00= 8.721YJfir,•. � LnX= ... z.ta i, '�qK RUNOFF RATES-0EVELOPED � Q=CiA . 05 = - 4.36 afs-i Q�o = 6.<1 ms ' mao= 6�82 v»s �. _ �.k:t g�' s � . ��' �p� ,�f i �- � .��q� . j a � -y � "r, � �,x� L. Q.':r�. '^r x:�e . BASIN: 80 DEVELOPED :UNOFF COEFFICIENTS-0EVELOPED S�� Nw FREQUENCY ^ TY� (a"�) % 2 5 10 700 � Toml 0.85 �pp Hard Surt 0.42 85.00 0.87 0.87 0.88 0.89 - Graea 0.07 10.00 0.05 0.1 02 0.4 � Gravei 0.00 0.00 0.15 0.25 0.35 0.65 � Raof .. � 0.16 25.00 0.8 0.85 0.9 0.9 � .. �� 0.00 0.87 O.BB 0.9 0.83 ��. Tolals 0.85 WEN3HTE6 0.77 : .0.79 `.�0.82 _O:dl '.: ).i4STORIC RUNOFF COEFFICIENTS '�:CiGIY� b:7. ME OF CONCENTRATION DEVELOPEDBASIN I INITIAL TRAVEL DISTANCE <500' 0 INITIAL SLOPE % � Z TRAVEL TIME DISTANCE � ��, TRAVELTIME SLOPE % 45 � GROUNDTVPE CONCRETECHANNEL VELOCfTV 32 � InBW Ti= 1.9(1.1-CS)(L)".5 - 0.00 min , S"3333 - TravN Tt = LlBOV 323 min � TO7AL TIME OF CONCENTRATION - 323 MIN L/190+tOTIME - 13.14 MIN II Ilg�`I'IME0FCbNCENI'1'p�['176NN6 Tc � �: � 5-7tS MIN ... ^ INTENSIiY RATES � 15 = ti.Gh�Yiilr '. i10= g:�:� . � . 1100= Y.1p ryjj�tr � , �= 1.17. .._,'.. S; "�AK RUNOFF RATEBAEVELOPED a=cw — os = , 3.58 ars s � Qto = .:� .3.18 eisY� otao= b.1b aflr: �_� � � BASIN: 90 DEVELOPED 1.RUNOFF COEFFICIENTS-0EVELOPED � Surtece A�ea qrea FREQUENCY TYPa I�sl % 2 5 10 100 - To1al 7.Id �pp � — — HardSurf 0.96 55.00 0.87 0.87 0.88 0.89�. : ., �. Grvas 0.35 2tl.00 0.05 0A 02 OA � Gravel 0.00 0.00 0.75 0.25 0.35 0.85 RooF 0.44 25.00 0.8 0.85 0.9 0.9 '�' OMier � 0.00 0.W 0.87 0.88 0.9 0.93 � To�ls 1.74 4VEIGFITEp O.EY : 0.71 �: 6.76 OiI9 �'- . ISTORIC RUNOFF COEFFICIENTS ^ tC700� 0:4. �3.TIME OF CONCENTRATION � �. DEVELOPED BASIN INITIAL TRAVEL DISTANCE <500' 300 INITNL SLOPE % Z � TRAVEL TIME DISTANCE �Sp �� TRAVEL TIME SLOPE % 0.5 GROUND ttPE GRASSED WATERWAY �- VELOCITV > > � InifialTi= 1.8(1.iC51(L)".5 - 70.00 min S^.3333 �� Trawl Tt = � L/e0V = 227 min TOTAL TIME OF CONCENTRATION - 12.27 MIN ,LH80+10TIME 1250 MIN ff$ETIME0K�iC0NCENT�WTWN�NB tc -: � .s 1�37MIN iN�eam nnrea— �s = a,m'mm� , � �m= �.ss.whr ' ' ��oo= •e.ecmmr LnX= ...2.5� � AK RUNOFP RATES-DEVELOPED _ a=cw a5 = 4'rS2 cri'' o�o = fi:64 eis i a�ao= 8.Y2 tfa. e �4�.: - � � -B . , � � F .C _ BASIN: 100 DEVELOPED . :UNOFF COEFFICIENTS-0EVELOPED ^ S�°� � Area FRE�UENCY TY� l°�') % 2 5 10 100 �� Toml 10.P �pp � � Hard Surt 4.85 45.00 O.B7 0.87 0.88 0.89 .. ^ Graea 3.77 35.00 0.05 0.1 0.2 0.4.. - Giavel 0.00 0.00 0.15 0.25 0.35 0.85.- � Roof 2.15 ZO.Op 0.8 0.85 0.9 0.9 � 0� 0�� 0.00 0.87 O.BB 0.9 0.93 ' To�ls � � 10.T7 WEWN7ED .' U.67 I 0.lD s�0.d6 'Os92 -!. ' ISTORIC RUNOFF COEFFICIENTS .:'c10U� D:�' ' ME OP CONCENTRATION �. DEVELOPED BASIN , INITIAL iRAVEL DISTANCE <500' . q75 � INITIAL SLOPE % p , � TRAVEL TIME DISTANCE �p �. TRAVELTIMESLOPE % 0.5 �. GROUND NPE GRASSED WATERWAV VELOCITY 1.1 InIfialTi= 7.8f1.1-05XL)".5 - 16.28m"vi S^.3333 � Trovel ft = UBW - 72.88 min ' TOTAL TIME OF CONCENTRATION 2H.77 MIN , UtBMtOTIME = 17.38 MIN 11�E71ME LYF CbpCENTFFkTION A9 .Tc :�:�:. . . .�i , •. 17.�Sd ININ • �, INTEN8ITY MTES i 6 = Zi6ziYldV;`, , � � . no= � 'b:ef:INAr . , �. i100= ;.73�INf�r LNC= 33] t I AK RUNOFF RATES-0EVELOPED - q=ciA .. '�. QS = �::. i91d'eril. mo = 1 Z6t39'ats': ' .�. a100= ' *{.i8 �Yfl��. �:� � ;;: e � � BASIN: 10/20/40 AT PACIFIC SUMP DEVELOPED �.�Z Of S�4 �✓ i.RUNOFF COEFFICIENTS-0EVELOPED P�f�,1-r Z � ^ S�� FREQUENCY � TY� (�) % 2 5 10 100 Total �Z.gq 100 - ' ' ... Hard Surt 8.95 55,Op 0.87 0.87 0.88 0.88� O� 2.53 20.00 0.05 0.1 0.2 0.4 � Grevel 0.00 0.00 0.4 0.45 0.5 0.6 Raof 3.16 25.W 0.8 0.&5 0.9 0.8 "� Other 0.00 0.00 0.87 0.88 0.8 0.83 . I T� 1284 V1IEfGHTEU 0.89 '�. 0.97 '..0.�6 0:)9 ::� � � STORIC RUNOFF COEFFIqENTS � �C7tl0� pj�.. b. iIME OF CONCENTRATION ��, DEVELOPEDBASIN � INITNL TRAVEL DISTANCE <5pp� � �„ INITIAL SLOPE % 2 , TRAVEL TIME DISTANCE � i TRAVELTIME SLOPE % 0.5 GROUND TVPE PAVED 8 GUTTER �. VELOCRY 1.5 �� Irvtial Ti= 1.811.1-CS)fLl".5 - 12.81 min S^.3333 � TravM Tt = Ugpy _ i - 8.89 rtun . TOTAL TIME OF CONCENTRATION - 21.80 MIN � lliBO*10TIME - 1772 MIN U��TIINEflF�bNCpNTNX710N-XB �Ta . 77.?2��MIN . INTEN8ITY RATES i5 = � •.2W,hYM;f. .. i10= :� J.AE NJlira . . , I700= t: b:77.MiM' �' 3.08 �, ,K RUNOFF RATES-0EVELOPED _, Q=cw : as = ��.26.78�ets �.:. Q10 = fJd.BG:Ca; ' r atoo= b7:94 uts � � o ^ BASIN: TOTAL AT PACIFIC SUMP DEVELOPED ��,� ��-f--f��„J 7.RUNOFF COEFFICIENTS-0EVELOPED �� SJ�r L)- � r . Surhoe q� . � - � Type �ecre.) FREQUENCY % Z 5 � 10 100 ' . - . Tdal 16.41 1� , .� � Herd Surt 9.03 55.00 0.87 0.87 O.eg -0.gg. ', Grasa 328 20.40 0.05 0.7 02 0.4 I' �K� 0.00 _ . o.00 o.a o.as os o.s Roor a.�o zs.ao o.e o.es o.a o.a � "' OUar 0.00 0.00 0.87 0.88 0.8 0.93 ' Totnls� 18.41 WEMsHYEb 0.89 ': 0.77 :: 0.7b U:78 ?: � �� ISTORIC RUNOFF COEFFICIENTS � -rCttlO� Oi4 - . b.TIME OF CONCENTRATION . , ^ DEVELOPEDBASIN INITIAL TRAVEL DI6TANCE « � � INRIAL SLOPE % Z TRAVEL TIME DISTANCE � ; TRAVEL TIME SLOPE % 0.5 OROUND TYPE PAVED 8 GUTTER — VELOCIIY ', 1.5 � IniCe17= 1.&1.1-05I(L)".5 ' 12.97 min S .3333 �' Treoal Tt = Ll80N - 8.89 min _ TOTAL TIME OF CONCENTRATION 21.80 MIN � ,U18M10TIME 17Y2 MIN � t19E'I�M�'BKCCNCEN7R7F1'WWNN718 �Te - f9.�':�:MINI INTENSITY RATES � I5 = ':. ' ,:: .;2.il�Wlv` . , ... �� tl0= �_battL iM�f. , noo= d.» uinw'. �- 3.08 � ^AK RUNOFF RATES-0EVELOPED _ Q=cw 05 = .;'94�77 tts '� mo = 'd4:99.u� : . � atao- 7d.46 as �.•_ `- , J ` � � J / � � � �.c. C f +=� r C_. . 1� ✓� �N� (�{" � r� r- . G. !� �:.� /! � ._. - � tJ�1..i. ' . > . i , ^ . � �r i-rt r+""� �,� r a.J � � �D1/`'"��v'^'�';�i.� ,.J _ �IT.�x.( �L . i �� I J �/� f � r� �G �R-�:"�/r�"1` ^�� It _ _ �� . . f1 S' .$ '-'i`^'� N'A r � r- �, .. . .t�.� ._ y, , �f;��:��o .. .� .. : _ v � � �°� / - � �' ( /-� �-L � r�'�K v i d`.� F c C fP..__ L ,� r.. ' r �<-. r-- .--�. ,r�,: ... .�� i ... /�'��..�� ll� 1" . � f'J.. b-'p:f} _' ) .� � `�� /4 G ! T �� / ' 7, �� c !.�C,�. �,- 1 _ � k . � i �` ��1 ; — � _ �' �'� ' z � � � ,cro� � -- ,�',� p�r -;-� /�40C � /�. I 3 / � � Na �r'/a--/-�z SH t= O / !-: G -�. ,__ 1" :��„ �' �- ✓r+a r' � � M n^. � � t uR� I�-'f - Z ... ��t k � �; �'N "1� i-!-=.,2 F�R t1-,...� , ' � O�� `r�-� LY� V/, , 1 / ��, ._ .. t �� L� (�- ) ... ' 1 �� ±' S�c r� VJ�,�/��" - (i�f !L�".,G-, ..�.—'�-- � Z � fy _ � ��. � ��k - � � a� (4�=� 1� — � Z _ .� - ' � ,�- . `�.^a f � �� .(� STRUCTURAL BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES DRAINAGE CRITERIA MANUAL ('J. 3) �.50 t � Q �.�lllp VS�� .'�" /�"'.'.�i C�aNJQ IZ`IA"7,N� - 0.45 --- -- ---- ----- - Exlended Delenlion Basin 0.40 40�hour Drain Time � � —_ __ _ _ . —_ _____. —____.. __ _ ._ � � Cons(ructed Wetland Basin / , y �.35 -- - "------ —--— --� 24-hour Drain Time ---- - --/ --�/� — m / / t � ° 6-hr drain lime a=Q7 J � 0.30 - -- --- _ —� a 12-hr drain(ime a=0.8 �A'� / °1 24-hr drain Ilme a=0.9 � L � m �.2rJ __ 40-hrdralnlime a=1.0 ._ .____—_ --_.__-- _._ �7,. .�_._.___ .' � �.2� ___— --_ _- _-_ -- -_- � o / -- 3 0.15 --- -- -- - �� '� Q.�Q --- — - ------- Retention Pond,Porous Pavemenl - ---- � Detention and Porous ^ 0.05 -- , — —,_--- _ ___ LandscapeDetention � 12-hour Drain Time �.�� " 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8� 0.9 1 Totel Impervlouen�ae Retlo(I�I„qH00) �� c� , � FIGURE EDB-2 Water QuaNty Capture Volume (WQCV�, 80'" Percentile Runoff Event ,,,� S-42 9-1-99 Urban Drainage and Flood C��nlrol Disfrid I APPENDIX B .. .. 421 21°`,Sude 212,Longmont,Co,80501 (303)772-7052;FAX 651-7226 STREET CAPACITY CHECK - INITIAL STORM "" PACIFIC CIRCLE AND FRONTAGE ROAD 3-7-04 BASIC DATA � All street sections are the same. 40' flowline to flowline 2' gutter pan _ 0.16' rise from flowline to edge of gutter 2%asphait cross-slope crown of street is at 0.52' when flowline is at 0.00' .., sidewalk width is 6' back of walk at 0.62' when flowiine is at 0.00' - BASIC REQUIItEMENTS Pacific Circle is considered a local street. The Frontage Road is considered a Collector. Per the requirements of the UDFCD manual, Street Capacity for Initial Storm, for Local — streets, the maximum permitted encroachment is that flow may spread to crown of street. For Collectors, flow spread must leave at least one lane free of water. Design Point 1 (North) — inlet 5 (triple 15' Type R) � Basin 20 Total QI0 = 1533cfs Street slope= 0.50% _ Nature of check-Drainage entering street from north side, check north"half capacity" assuming Y=crown elevation(0.52'). Also, check inlet"take down"and sireet "pass through". .. NATURAL CHANNELS �' VARIABLES LIST: Y - FLOW ELEVATION Q - FLOWRATE S - CHANNEL SLOPE � VARIABLE TO BE SOLVED (Y,Q OR S) ? Q Enter up to 20 cross- section points. Enter <Return> only for distance to end. �` Y (FT) ? .52 S (FT/FT) ? .005 CROSS-SECTION POINTS DIST ELEV COEFF ------------------ 0 .62 .013 6 .5 .013 RESULTS 6.1 0 .013 " _________________ 8 .16 .013 Q= 12.28 CFS 26 .52 .013 � A= 4. 11 SF P= 21.42 FT � V= 2.99 FPS � F= 1.19 SUPER-CRITICAL FLOW Result - Checking the inlet tables, we find that the inlet will intercept 5.7cfs (actual capacity, after reduction) at maximum (0.50')depth of flow. This allows 9.63 cfs to pass "' down the north side of Pacific Circle. Design Point 1 (South) Basin 20 _ Total Q10 = 1533cfs Street slope=0.50% '� Nature of check-Drainage entering street from north side, check south depth of flow _ assuming Q=3.05 cfs. Total 15.33 cfs, less the 12.28 cfs that fills the north side of street to the crown. Check clear asphalt. �, NATURAL CHANNELS VARIABLES LIST: � Y - FLOW ELEVATION Q - FLOWRATE S - CHANNEL SLOPE ' VARIABLE TO BE SOLVED (Y,Q OR S) ? Y Enter up to 20 cross- ,� section points. - '�� Enter <Return> only for ��, distance to end. Q (CFS) ? 3.05 ^� S (FT/FT) ? .005 CROSS-SECTION POINTS '�, � DIST ELEV COEFF DIST ELEV ---------------- ---------- .� 26 .52 .013 � 44 .16 .013 ��, RESULTS 45.9 0 .013 _________________ 46 .5 .013 � Y= 0.34 FT 52 . 62 .013 ', A= 1.35 SF P= 11.43 FT V= 2.25 FPS . � F= 1.14 SUPER-CRITICAL FLOW Result-Depth of flow on the south side of street(034') indicates gutter full (0.16'j and '- first 9' of asphalt inundated(0.18'/2°/a�I'). There will be 9' of clear asphait at this point (20' from crown to flowline, less 2' gutter pan, less 9' asphalt) during the 10 year event. Design Point 2 _ Basin 10/20/40 less Inlet 5 , Total Q10 =28.95cfs Street slope=0.50% ,,, Nature of check—Drainage from basins 10, 20, 40 enters from both sides of street and overtops crown to equalize depth of flow on both sides. Determine depth of flow at this ' point. �' NATURAL CHANNELS VARIABLES LIST: � ' Y - FLOW ELEVATION Q - FLOWRATE S - CHANNEL SLOPE �� VARIABLE TO BE SOLVED (Y,Q 0R S) ? Y Enter up to 20 cross- � section points. ! Enter <Return> only for .. distance to end. Q (CFS) ? 28.95 ^ S (FT/FT) ? .005 CROSS-SECTION POINTS i . DIST ELEV COEFF DIST ELEV COEFF .. '--------------- ----------- ! 0 .62 .013 6 .5 .013 � RESULTS 6.1 0 .013 '� _________________ 6 .16 .013 � Y= 0.54 FT 26 .52 .013 A= 9.13 SF 44 .16 .013 � � P= 44.95 FT 45.9 0 .013 , V= 3.13 FPS 46 .5 .013 F= 1.21 SUPER-CRITICAL FLOW 52 .62 .013 Result-Depth of flow is 0.54', 0.02' above crown of roadway. There is no clear asphalt � — at this locarion. This is the worst case location on the site. As this is only 0.02' above the ' crown of the roadway,and since the street has two points of egress,ttus depth of flow is acceptable. ; � Design Point 7 (North) Basin 60 _ Total Q 10=42%of Basin 60=0.42x7.81cfs=3.28cfs Street slope=0.50% Nature of check—Drainage entering street from north side, check north side depth of � flow. � NATURAL CHANNELS VARIABLES LIST: Y - FLOW ELEVATION Q - FLOWRATE S - CHANNEL SLOPE ^ VARIABLE TO BE SOLVED (Y,Q OR S) ? Y Enter up to 20 cross- , section points. � Enter <Return> only for ^ distance to end. � ''�� Q (CFS) ? 3.26 � '� S (FT/FT) ? .005 CROSS-SECTION POINTS �, DIST ELEV COEFF DIST ELEV ------------------ -------- 0 .62 .013 6 .5 .013 � RESULTS 6.1 0 .013 I� _________________ 8 .16 .013 � Y= 0.35 FT 26 .52 .013 � A= 1.44 SF � P= 11.80 FT V= 2.28 FPS F= 1.14 SUPER-CRITICAI, FLOW , Result-Depth of flow on the north side of street(035') indicates gutter full (0.16')and first 9.5' of asphalt inundated(0.19'/2%=9.5'). There will be 8.5' of deaz asphalt at this — point(20' from crown to flowline, less Y gutter pan, less 9.5' asphalt)during the 10 year ' event. " Combine this amount with clear feet of asphalt on south side of street to determine total clear feet of asphalt. ! Design Point 7 (South) — inlet 4 Basin 30 — Total Q 10= 8.60cfs Sireet slope=0.50% , Nature of check—Drainage entering street from south(east, off-site)side, check south side depth of flow. ��. ^ NATURAL CHANNELS VARIABLES LIST: Y - FLOW ELEVATION Q - FLOWRATE S - CHANNEL SLOPE VARIABLE TO BE SOLVED (Y,Q OR S) ? Y Enter up to 20 cross- � section points. �� Enter <Return> only for distance to end. Q (CFS) ? 8.6 � � S (FT/FT) ? .005 C.R03S-SECTION POINTS P19T ELSV CO�FE . DIST ELEV -------- ^ "u ' _o< :Ot9 � S .h t 4 RESULTS 6.1 0 .013 . ,_ �ma_s�====______= a � c ro s Y= 0.47 FT 26 .52 .013 ��, A= 3_10 SF P= 17.71 FT � � V= 2.77 FPS � �, F= 1.15 SUPER-CRITICAL FLOW Result -Depth of flow on the south side of street(0.47') indicates gutter full (0.16')and first 1S.5' of asnhalt inundated(0.31'/2%=15.5'). There will be 2.5' of clear asnhalt at — this point(20' from crown to flowline, less 2' gutter pan, less 15.5' asphalt) during the 10 vear event. , '— Combining the 8.5' of clear asphalt on the north side of the street with the 2.5' of clear asnhalt on the south side of the street we find 11' of clear asnhalt. or one clear Vavel lane. _ This is the worst case location on the Frontage Road. � Checking the inlet tables, we find that the inlet will intercept 4.95cfs (actual capacity, _ after reductionl at 0.47' denth of flow. This allows 3.65 cfs to tiass down the north side of Pacific Circle. �� LG��.� �air-�Q 4� i��ets 2,3 (total of 4 triple 15' Type Rs) — Basin 10/20/40/60/70 less Inlet 5 ', Tofal Q10=39.29cfs (Q25�1Ox133=52.39 cfs) Street slope = sump — Nature of check—Drainage from basins 10,20,40, 60, 70 sumps at this point. Check , inlet "take down". — Checking the inlet tables,we find that the inlets will each intercept 1539cfs (actual capacity, after reduction)at 0.50' depth of flow. For the 4 inlets,this yields a total capacity of 61.56 cfs. This capacity is well above the required 52.39 cfs that the sump can — expect to intercept. Notice that 5239cfs is the estimated Q25 (assumed to be QIOx1.33) that must be passed under collector streets at crossings of this nature. _ Design Point 5 — inlet 1 Basin 30/8U less Inlet 4 Total QI O=6.85cfs _ Street slope= sump � Nature of check—Drainage from basins 30 and 80 sumps at this point. Check inlet "take down". Result- Checking the inlet tables, we find that the inlet will intercept 15.39cfs(actual capacity, aS�r reduction) at 0.50' sump depth. This capacity is well above the required _ 6.85 cfs that the sump can expect to intercept. � _ � . . � _ —_ . . _ � • :• � • . . . . , . . . � � / � � � � . . . � , , � � � � � '•' ��--�� `---�°—�� ;�� .. �:�=��'._�=''=- =�_��= �__-__ � Y;��1 r��.�_ww i�•��r wim�� se�� ..Y'u�' r�- �A�nii��iui�sm�m� ��w� � auiis�i�� e!'��'��m u��iiiii�� • • � � �rM�Y�mi�ii�ii�i t� ��i��minY�� ~ �� Y�Y��YW�Ai��aY1WWYYY�W� W0��YYB � � i�Y � � Z..j� �Cy.�� S�� TJ _ ___ ____ •C . � _ _ ��:�...�.....'�..�.�� __. _____�_ _ ^� �. • �...��.�Q� ..�... .�� ..'.. �_..__ _ _____.__'�'^...�� '��:::�.� '�'.'1 �. . .�.............� ............:� . � �. _ �..�.. �. . . � ��.��.�... • �.. .. S�i�::� . .�:':i::�:��J .'.�.... ' .�.' '.......:..:�_�____�_�__�_�_�___��_�_��_��.�.�...�. -� S�::��....::t:::::.^.::......��........::."'..�� . �. __....._..:�._��:W�:::.�.:•�.C�.� • ....::...::...........�"..�... ......... . . .� . . �.'. ��.r ___ . ___ _____�_ ___________ _ __ _ __ _ _ . .::� • � :::.:••:.:.. ••" "' ._:-��,.,°_e^'�E?i:F.fiti:a:ee:ii'�:`-:"�:�� ee.::::;:^�..:..°'..:::�=s�.:c3::_::?EE_�-:3'e:?t�,-i�elt �._.�EE::e�?:�� _ � �� — — _— �;�:=:::.:.. �5: s.'"' _ __-=-- — — �—��_�_ y;��i� ^��see:�^�:�=w� _—��w=�� r��u�d'..�'�.�.�'s: ':EF';�_�=::_s-::_�—'—e.::.`=T�`= a � � a,a�,�s:eW�E.�:..:_e� ':,- _—.�.='--_��__�� E''�.�E'��' . , .. ..:----=�:..�....e.�..---�—�--� �� Y�„11�4�i��Y�tii14V�i��_��I�-�� M�m��w�A�S�i�lr�� =�_ a� mo��_.nv..��iiu��:ouii�imr.�.aie��$iiuunu vmfs�r�+� ��Z u��versrZ T�'__=�• ��' �-.r._ — _____ �ao=�=_� � L�^ ' �i�:��J�i� � �� _�� i � �'-..�.:Y'."�. � ______ ___ __ ..'�':m��.�:�..:y: ��,�.�3�� a -,—� ..:�_.. .. ..._ ..�� —� ..Y�- • � :�CC�]^:.:CY�:��.:C�::'`::^��::7��"' � �::��•.:�:�..'�•E:-:=. .�� ..�.. � ... .� . ...777...6.. ��'�..:...............71.::.^,7:::.:X::7Y::..i�7.^'..�.�".�..�s ' ... -..�.. '^"'.^...:.'.:...^'..:' � �'. ��.W... . ... . . ..�.'- . ... .... - ...1..... :.:�........� ... ...��.�.:�..........e::.'��.7..""..'.::::'�'..:�.�.��P..� ��..��.I71:7C7:.• ...........�� ."" "7:....................7� ��R1:. �.I. �� ::i:: �.�7: ..=..�� a W:i:�'�:R:eoEE:�.::�M:.� —c�-��-�d..rv;i:��oP3�- .....a......::_...Y�� y�un��um� u„ �m u��mu�mnnumnm�o�u�u�owo�m��uw �io o�i� ��YItlNtlN�1�INYlY�pl��pn pN��OY��.�MAw��p�OM��v�l�� q�O mAs yM!��I%��IIIIIII�II�IIIIIII�Ip�pIO�:�IIIAY�Ip��j\;��A�m p;1�q��YY p p��p , iiiiiuriiiiiii iii�ii i`ii��,i iiiiiii�iiui ip�iiiiiiiiii�iii��i ni�i��iiiiiri�� iii�i��°� 1 � Y�IIIIIIIII�IIIIIIIIIIOII��IIIIIIIIIIIItlp��pppp��ry�pOW��ux�wuiumm� npp� p11111t1111�WItI11NI1W �p1O111W1IWtl��p��ry��p�p��OIOmOI1O1101�_`�� 1 .�.:7:��i��':'C�'�:e�-.'��`� ��.��__ --��—� �. r:�— �a�w=—= �=--�=�--'33;�—�� Ev=�_'—�,Y ?—=-�':��==—^_ � ' ' :�:r s��-�a..�-�==.^_ �=�`'._'`==��a r i�:.W.��o- —�e� � � �'L3L.�.� 1�i��:��-e.=.�'9S��L�.'L�'�� ..s. ��' . ��..�....�.s.o.��.�.� � �'�'�S i8��in�r w�o�:Ni��••��'e�s �� smw�u��iw�n��ea� r�!""... .avr.��n..:.eo�.aS�i�i�iiio�si�iw��ia�oiii�� a�w�i 1 .nw.sv�us nor u_Y�s�rur��iv "' i'_ f��•_'�a—_A 6�. ' rr�� 'r_ '._+_ s_= �'_ ---� oe 1 . 6'�=�.r'�=�_�::�_=�-----=s_� —�'_.� 1 � �= `-_--_ --�.�_� ` —^�� --�� ' A, a` __ _.� s_ �� aia�?�.:::�__� :_. ��_::5=s�sz:� '=�� . .�✓.iu ��......�"�••..••—..._��--""_�..— ._ , � :�i . '��ii �i�ii�� ti�� 7A:CI ..�".`^.'.'.^.^ �� '.^'.:77 ��_^�A�w L��......'�t.. L�� C �".C2C.aS�:u'��.9:�^��:�:7C .....�CL.:C.....�. .....�.��.. }......aT7:�,� �~ ��:��:�::r� == ' �....:..:::�:e:_3•' �:y��:d .�� ..S��_� q"�o:.:.:' �S�as �...�r�_.= _ � � � . � : � � � • � � • • � �► . ._ • •• . .- . ..� . , _ � . . .- . � . _. -•- , � , c —:'�� e e i c � a - � _ _ ___ • - r • . . . . . � . a � i � � . � . • � . � � , • • . � , ,'_�L��—�.v�� ..��9...��— ��,-�—"..o''...=�`-- �='�.:.:�"'7C.�.�.:...�..�..�r..��',%C'.u"��'��'�. � �s-�.s�i-r:e-......�.�......��.:: ..��.e��..r:'.e"�:::�.'•'�i�•^•C^��' S � 1 �.r��m�=uu'�i�iiiu_"""'iiii u��u�um • ��w� �� ze.�.i;==�� _"' Nn..x n ..� __________- YW��WWWY�YW�� a' :--._._.___`_:'�:=_::.---------= Ls��__._._ m,� �:_-::::::::�-,-----�.._...�___=_='°__��""__--_.----°-'--'_'— -•--_•••_..........._____•-:=:•-_.....--------------------•--_ �'------- .. _-- ----�.._..._ � --.._.-------' •-•--•• ---- �-•-••-.......:::-:::�_:: ------ s-.::::��__;-��:::_:::,�� __ ...._..._..._.__..-i::.:::::::::.:___='_--:__------_�::.�_:-.�.:-_:::_..� :"';: -�__� r'ee:?:.:•r.:•o.,.:•.r.....'-"'"":._::car.--'--'_e___a:'"�.:-_._.j.,.`..�"'-"vsai:i=::=�•_ �s......:.:...•:}.':t:...."-'eooc' ' ____"" '"" _.._:`"'� """_ • �;............�..:.:.:i,.:-r:::a:::::�ii2Ecie__="ac'e'�'c:s.::��:i�:i��:.-x=::E=��' � 5:;��: •.:::iE:P:-�::5::�eeeeeieEiee�3�=c _ ' }�� __ ;_...-�::5:�::�::�:•._+•.�?i="_ �:.«.«'j'" ...............��:'ce :+��t .�.""" ^..'�.^��".� �.7w'4't.«iwi�r..� =_��e .~'^r.� ��_ .�:�'�: � �:w-.:..++..+...�.^�_�. "`:::::.:�.�� '�.�`-7S�.:�' �'i.'�L':��T�� .v'„��'��SC�� `f�-s��d r�i�-' -___- _-_—�Y''==�;=��_-_ ea : :aa ��:^:�"=`=��"::�=—=-=-==.�_`� �.::e:�:a.:.:::::e- ---- ---�—��-.�,;:�—�. �.---_� �"� :C•...-s'^� --....-� ! —.._ I �iY.� w•..��s Y ��-•�•Y ww'��uiuuie�rlYu��.iili�SiiM�� __`_ -- �__Y=`- __ � �u.��sm��.u_uwu�n�urs sr'�y` _'_-�'t �_ "'______' �s._o� 1 �__ '_ __ ______ '_ _. __==s__oo_ �� i�_ .-�.. ..-.�^�� ` �� .�� _ �� L�.��=� � ....'�.' _ A.�^3 _ • �l�p��::G�'.�.'l�"... �� -- �.�.��.� -�. ��S � =�� - � �� :i.'�� ^]u:: �-7^' �� " '�� 'y �� M��C� �":: m ��f�w�'i�.:�u�.mu u::i r��'TjSs��i 9....::�Yw�:.�i�i.��" ::um�.�"��'� ''��•='� --��;�� nuuuiu�u�m�nwn�u�muu��uu�o�n�o�i�iimw o�in��i.._ u amw=nun�xnuumumuw��uo�anw��o�o�w�m�u�u�u pbY��q�1�s�� O�I�p11111110Y1�YY��p�1�111�011��t��1��l�11��191SOINO�I��YI 1\IO„-I�YIYY 1 �i�wriiiiiiiiiii�ii°iiiiiiiiiiiiiii�iiinn°iuiiiiiiiiiiii�,�ewu�uo�inii�u � ji i�unumam� muuwmnu mmm■ wnu�um II��u�q�WpIMINWIp11nIRn�� Uj uu!i iyu �° �iiiiiiiii=iiiiiii!iiiiiiiiiiiuiiiiiiiiiiii�iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiim�..�.�o��w:n�"�:::�=::n��iiiili�Wpli�YN � � mu��uwnuuiiw�nwnmLuuunwn��m�n�mu.—�• � �.�'�_�._�?_-:�3�::�_--: —__'�=m�ommnmm�� .��_��-'_'--��_—'�`�-.��=_=�� - 1 �:�'�7'�'Jr'�.�.��"��':�L� �__�� .. � ��. t i� ..... .. ��_' ��w_�� i+3"��:::;_-?��:�—��.=.-��,"^=�� • :.::sib��..s."�^'�?�'�.::9�::�r��^?:c::.::::::�.e^="""°�'�:�._�_� ............. �.:.,�a�...a... 1 ruu�u�umric.rimr.nw-.m�r..usru�u�u��iw�"��'wmrm iun�vur �. �J ' �u0v�r�u�Y �W�v�� IIr'iilii .3 ::� - �.o=:__.. —_ ��' � � —�. ��v��t�].�`�`�.��. �� ` ��C�� ₹:i��'!�� •�. �� .� .� n:'�^- _ .' ----- - - .'-'��— � ��a��J�•' �a� -='= -�� - �� ?�� ___ .�.�..... :�a �.�C��o�"'7�'u��'.IC:7�t�i:iic11J9��w.'�w: yST.w�'.""� --- ��-•�a_�aa � • � : � : � � , . , , � � � . ► � ✓ � � : .- . . . .- . ... . _ - . . . .- . , , ., - � - A • � , < < BOULDER COUNTY � � ` STORM L�RAIPVAGE CRITERIA MANUAL F�GcrR� aos �1L.l.IJ1AI.A,�iLE INLET CAPACITY _ SUMP CONDITIONS - ALL INLETS z U w � _ _ � 12 Q � � V � z wv 8 O3 J O m } J -� < � : . a1JL ! o a 4 TYPE C INIET � o - < � Q � � w 0 0.2 0.4 - 0.8 0.8 1.0 � - DEPTH OF FLOW (FT) I 20 " LL -- -- TYPE 13 COMBINATION � CURB INLET TYPE R ' — . _ � � � �e ' L� 1� � �' ,�.�, � �Q,� o U �k — d 3 ' � S L P�� " i`^P � ,� o �, � J 12 v W !, = G v .� "r �/ F~- W � J C7 m � ♦ W ' < J _ o e ,—. _ (, � t F� . � ov0 a . � � / ,�o � ��1O .g`N Ej � � � �j � 4 • � , - � / 1.=5' �g} < f / 0 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.b _ DEPTH OF FLOW �FT) WRC EMl3. REFERENCE: � WRC ENQINEEflINQ, INC., TM-2 FEB 1984 -f324- - BOULDER COUNTY STORM DRAINAGE CRITERIA MANUAL FIGURE aos ALLOWABLE INLET CAPACITY SUMP CONDITIONS - ALL INLETS z w � J - W tll �2 fn 0 Q - z � 3 = w " 03 J .^ < 1- 8 4 LL ' o a a = TYPE C INLET � o _ — < V S F' � w 0 0.2 0.4 0.8 0.8 1.0 � - DEPTH OF FLOW (FT) 20 ' �, -- -- TYPE 13 COMBINATION w � CURB INLET TYPE R ' — v � >' 7 8 a � 1 N�- � I � Q.� O - d pf' �•� f � ,� '� 3 i , c`� �� P�= C�^^ / ,� � � - W ,2 � .�- l6 � �' w J F, ' z Q �r G��- ` i .3� f-r / ►- � w p � J t 0 � • W _ � 8 � / �J� 3 � O ' O � � •a� '�1 .g�N �� < , � � �i � q • g � ' �'g� t _ / �,5 � / 0 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 _ DEPTH OF FLOW �FT) ' WRC ENl3. REFERENCE: WRC ENQINEERINQ, WC., TM-2 FEB 1884 -�24- APPENDIX C 421 21°',Suke 212,Longmont,Co,80501 (303)772-7052;FAX 657-7226 1 � WRRENT DATE: 01-27-2009 FILE DATE: 01-27-2004 � ��. / ^ CURRaNT TIME: 12:1B:19 FILE NAME: pAVCppT l_ �� ( P � Pf �N7,%n- r�-+ S FHWA CULl2RT ANALy5IS � HY-B, VERSION 4.1 (� � r i .r ��C Uf SITE DATA � ' � CULVERT SHAPE, [�TERIAL, INL6T I J� �r 1 �v � � � L INLET OUTLET CULVBRT � BARRELS � V ELEV. ELEV. LENGTH SHRPE SPAN RISE MANNING INLET � � 1 � L ' �� (FT) (FT) (£T) MATERIAL (FT) (FT) n TYPE �.X �.4D 4 y ,� 1 71.34 70.74 30.01 1 RCP 2.00 2.00 .012 COM/ENTIONAL a � l /Z 2 3 - , M.ax � �•vi ' I6 � i - 4�,�� r � i 2 CORRENT DATE: 01-27-2009 £ILE DATE: 01-27-2004 � CUAAENT TSME: 12:18:19 FILE NAME; DAVCDOT PERFORM7IMCE CURVE FOR CULVERT 1F 1 - 1 ( 2 BY 2 ) RCP � DIS- HEAp- uJJ,ET OUTLET '� CHARGE WATER CONTROL CONTAOL FLO➢7 NOAMAL CRITICAL OUTLET TAII.IWq'gR � FLOW ELEV. DEPTH DEPTH TYPE DEPTH DEPTH VEL. DEPTH VEL. D6PTH (cfs) (ft) (ft) (fq <F4> (ft) (fU Ifps) (ft) (fpn) (ft) ^ � 0 71.34 0.00 0.00 0-NF 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 , 4 72.33 0.99 0.99 1-32n 0.47 0.72 6.96 0.50 2.88 0.58 9 72.87 1.53 1.53 1-S2n 0.67 1.04 8.19 0.74 3.52 0.86 '� 13 73.34 2.00 2.00 1-S2n 0.89 1.29 8.80 0.95 3.93 1.07 17 73.86 2.52 2.52 5-92n 0.99 1.49 9.92 1.13 4.29 1.25 � 22 74.51 3.17 3.17 5-92❑ 1.19 1.65 9.97 1.30 4.50 1.40 � 26 75.32 3.98 3.98 5-32n 1.29 1.78 10.58 1.45 4.72 1.54 30 76.30 4.96 4.96 5-92n 1.44 1.90 11.26 1.59 9.91 1.67 39 77.43 6.09 6.09 5-92n 1.63 2.00 11.85 1.75 5.08 1.79 39 78.69 7,35 5.68 6-FFn 2.00 2.00 12.32 2.00 5.23 1.90 � 43 80.10 8.76 6.68 4-££t 2.00 2.00 13.69 2.00 5.37 2.00 ' ' E1. inlet face invert 71.34 ft E1. outlet invert 70.74 ft E1. inlet ihroat invert 0.00 ft E1. inlet creat 0.00 ft *«`�" 9ITE DATA ***•* CULVEAT INVERT �R**•*:.«...o. �, INLET 9TATION (FT) 0.00 INLET ELEVATION (FT) 71.34 , OUTLET STATION (Pf) 30.00 � � OUTLBT ELBVATION (PT) � 70.74 � NVAffiER OF BARRELg 1 SLOPE (V-FT/H-FT) 0.0200 CULVy+RT LENC�A'H ALONG 9LOPE (FT) 30.01 � •.+.� CULV6RT DATA 9UtQ91RY •••••r•••�«•.+.+.�...rt , HARRBL SFWPE CIRCULAR ' BARREL OIAMET6R 2,00 FT HARREL MATERIAL CONCRETE � BARREL MANNING'3 N 0.012 INLET TYPE CONVENTIONAL INLET SDG6 AND SWLL SQUARE EDGE S2TH F�ADiW.L INLBT DEPA695ION NONE 3 CURRENT DATE: 01-27-2004 FILE DATE: 01-27-2004 CUARBNT TIM@: 12:18:19 FILE NAME: DAVCDOT '�' TAILWATER """�" AL+GULAR CHANNEL CROS9 SECTION "'t•"`�*xRR:..<.r BOTTOM WID'fH (FT) 2.00 � � 3ZDE SLOP6 H/V (X:1) 1.0 ' �. CHANNEL 9LOPE V/H (ET/FT) 0.004 MANNING'3 N (.01-0.1) 0.018 CHANNSL INVERT ELEVATION (FT) 7p,7q ,� CULVERT NO.1 OUTLET INVERT SLEVATION 70.7q y'� '' `�+��w' UNIFORM PLWP W\TING CURVE FOR DO➢PNSTRF.APf CHANNEL FLOLP W.S.E. FROUDE DEPTH VEL. 3HEAR . � (CE9) (FT) NUMBER (FT) (FpS) (PSF) � 0.00 70 J9 0.000 0.00 0.00 0.00 ' 4.30 71.32 0.668 0.58 2.88 0.19 8.60 71.60 0.670 0.86 3.52 0.21 12.90 71.81 0.670 1.07 3.93 0.27 ^ 17.20 71.99 0.670 1.25 4.24 0.31 21.50 72.14 0.669 1.90 4.50 0.35 25.80 72.28 0.669 1.54 4.72 0.39 30.10 72.41 0.669 1.67 4.91 0.42 34.40 72.53 0.669 1.79 5.08 0.45 � 38.70 72.64 0.670 1.90 5.23 0.47 � 43.00 72.79 0.670 2.00 5.37 0.50 APPENDIX C .. 421 21",Suite 212,LongmoM,Co,80501 (303)772-7052;FAX 651-722G i CURggNT DATE: 01-27-2004 FILE DATE: 01-27-2004 � dr' G ^ "' CURE2ENT TIME: 12:18:19 FILe NAME: ppVCD(Yf 1 i J� (� P � P£ �N7,�R /,.�S Ff14ZA CULVERT ANpyySIS ... HY-8. VERSION 4.1 (N � � ≥ � i�� I 3ITE DATA I CULVERT SHAPS. !4\TERIHL, INLET � J � � � �f- , U I L INLET OVTLET CULV6RT � BARqgL3 �. V ELEV. ELEV. LENGTH 9HAYE SPAN RISE DDWNING INLET � %" J `'L � �� (FY') (FT) (FT) MATERIAL (FT) (FT) n TYPE /��, 1 71.34 70.79 30.01 1 RCP 2.00 2.00 .012 CONVENTSONAL � ��'" �4-0�4�C /� 2 3 _ a M•ax C �•v� � 6 ,I ; = 4�,� � � � �- _ ' � CURRENT DATE: 01-27-2004 FILE DATE: 01-27-2004 � CURR$}M' TIME: 12:18:19 FILE NAhffi: DAVCDOT PEAFOAMANCE CURVE FOR CULVERT Y 1 - 1 ( 2 8Y 2 ) RCP DIS- NEAD- IITLET OUTLST �, CHARGE 1PA.T6R CONTROL CONTROL FLO1P NORMAL CRITICAL OUTS,ET TAILNATER FLOW ELEV. DEPTH DEPTH TYPE DBPTH DBPTH VEL. DEPTH VEL. DEPTH (cfs) (ft) (ft) (ft) <F4> (ft) (ft) (fps) (ft) (fpe) (ft) - 0 71.34 0.00 0.00 0-NF 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 � 4 72.33 0.99 0.99 1-92n 0.47 0.72 6.96 0.50 2.98 0.50 9 72.87 1.53 1.53 1-92n 0.67 1.04 8.14 0.74 3_52 0.86 13 73.34 2.00 2.00 1-S2n 0.84 1.29 8.80 0.95 3.93 1.07 17 73.86 2.52 2.52 5-32n 0.99 1.49 9.g2 1.13 4.29 1.25 22 74.51 3.17 3.17 5-32n 1.19 1.65 9.97 1.30 4.50 1.40 ^ 26 75.32 3.98 3.98 5-S2n 1.29 1.78 10.58 1.45 4.72 1.54 30 76.30 9.96 4.96 5-92n 1.44 1.90 11.26 1.59 9.91 1.67 34 77.43 6.09 6.09 5-92n 1.63 2.00 11.85 1.75 5.08 1.79 39 78.69 7.35 5.68 6-FFn 2.00 2.00 12.32 2.00 5.23 1.90 ^ 43 80.10 8.76 6.68 4-FFL 2.00 2.00 13.69 2.00 5.37 2.00 � E1. inlet face invert 71.34 ft E1. outlet invext 70.74 ft E1. inlet thxoat invert 0.00 ft E1. inlet czest 0.00 ft ^ "'k••+ SITE DATA *+i�"F CULVERT INVERT �'�t�*•*+•+x«** INLET 9TATION (FT) 0.00 INLET ELEVATION (FT) 71.34 OUTLET STATION (PT) 30.00 � OtTTLET ELEVATION (FT) � 7p��q N[iMBER OF HAItRELg y SLOPE (V-FT/H-FT) 0.0200 CULVy+RT LSNGTH ALONG 3LOPE (FT) 30.01 � +:i.. CULVBRT DATA 9UMR�RY •++w.kx.Rk�..�..kw:w.x« BARR6L 9HAPE CIRCULNt BARABI. DIAMETER 2.00 FT BARREL MATERIAL CONCRETE BAAREL MNTNING'S N 0.012 '� INLET TYPE CONVENTIONAL INS.ET SDGE AND NALL SQUARE 6DGE KiTH HEApWpLL INLBT DEPRESSION NONE 3 '� CURRENT DATE: 01-27-2004 FILE DATE: 0S-27-2004 CURRENT TII+II:: 12:18:19 FILE NAME: DAVCDOR �+ TAIlHIATER "�"" RSGULNY CHANN$'E CROS9 9ECTION *'•*�*+er:.:.... BdfTOM TiIDTH (FT) 2.00 � � 3ID% SLOPE H/V (X:1) 1 Q CHANNEL 9LOPE V/H (PT/FT) 0.004 MANNING'S N (.01-0.1) 0.018 � CHANAEL INVERT ELEVATION (FT) 7p,7q ^ CULVERT NO.1 OUTLET INVERT ELEVATION 70.7q gT ��"�`��`" UNIFORM FLOSP p},TING CURVE £OR DO➢p[�STREpH CHANNgL FLO9T p*.S.E. FAOUDE DEPTH VEL. 3HEAR � (CFS� (FT) pqM7gER (FT) (FpS) (pSF) 0.00 70.79 0.000 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.30 71.32 0.668 0.58 2.88 0.14 8.60 71.60 0.670 0.86 3.52 0.21 12.90 71.81 0,670 1.07 3.93 0.27 ,�, 17.20 71.99 0.670 1.25 4.24 0.31 21.50 72.14 0.669 1.40 4.50 0.35 25.80 72.28 0.669 1.59 9.72 0.39 30.10 72.41 0.669 1.67 4.91 0.42 39.40 72.53 0.669 1.79 5.08 0.45 � 38.70 72.64 0.670 1.90 S.p3 0.47 43.00 72.7g 0.670 2.00 5.37 0.50 � r y LYONS 66 PACIFIC COMMERCE PARK HYDRAULIC ANAI,ySIS OF CDOT PIPE SYSTEM 1-27-04 PIPE 31 ZS EX23TING 24'• pIpg ENTERING 9ITE FORD1 CDOT INLET BETWEEN 92TE AND FRONTAGE RW�D. 43.00 CFS IS CALCULp1'ED MH$I[.{[n.{ p039IBLE PIpE CAPACITy. _ (SEE HYB OUTPUT DATA, FILE DAVCDOT) Usen Name: Chuck � '� eroject: davia Date: 01-27-pg . � - Network: 01 - cdot outlet Time: 17;2q;p5 Page: 1 _cvc`___mF-PE DATA TotFlow a_-6`v'-a'a-ef_-`Y_ P pipe Dn p Pipe PiPe Pi e e �s n � � ��a��ma:a�z�a��a��:��a�e Len Type Dim P Pipe (cfs) (ft) (in) n Inv Inv E1 E1 � 43.00 302.53 Citculai 36.00 43.00 Zqq,gq 0.013 4967.70 9968.61 pipe 10 Circular 36.00 0.013 4968.81 4969.54 pipe 20 43.00 284.80 Citculer 36.00 0.013 9969.64 4970.50 Pipe 30 - 43.00 27.38 Circular 24.00 0.013 4970.70 4971.24 Pipe 31 � � O ? -" � (I �L User Name: Chuck � Pioject: davis Date: 01-27-04 � Network: 01 - cdot outlet Time: 17:2q;39 Page: 1 �Ss�a HYD1tAVLIC DATA 1 HGL a=:sa=�=:�a��ve��e�� `==i-Qoa ��m��a:�:e�s� UP SGL nEnL EGL SGL HGL (�) �P S Dn (b) ^ 4971.74 0.62 4970.83 4972.31 0.49 4969.84 � 9972.90 0.41 4972.46 4973.48 0.41 49�4•52 0.41 4973.91 4971.88 4977.11 7.56 4975.09 0.41 4973.33 4977.57 4980.02 7.56 9974.66 Usei Name: Chuck � Pioject: davis Date: 01-27-09 Network: 01 - cdot outlet Time: 17:24:q0 Page: 1 a��L9 HYDRAULI�'Dp�� 2 �a��e�a�:»��a�� Dn UP Dn e"�`��z��a»��e m�e�� Dep pep y �P x7 Calc Ciit lin) (inl V ('n'C) K7 D (ft/a) (ft/n) (in) 25.64 36.00 7.98 6.08 0.25 0.144 25.64 " 36.00 36.00 6.08 6.08 36.00 36.00 . 0.75 0.432 25.64 6.08 6.OB 0.25 0.144 25.64 24.00 24.00 13.69 13.69 0.50 1.456 23.57 1 CURRENT DATE: 01-03-2009 FILE DATE: 01-01-2004 � CURRENT TIME: 18:05:17 FILS NAMC: DAVISI EH4PA CULVERT ANALYSIS �. HY-8� VER9ION 4.1 UI SITE DATA � CULVSRT SHAPE, MATERIAL, INLET � � � L INLST OUTL6T CULVSRT � BARRgLS I � V ELEV. ELEV. LENGTH 9HAPE SPAN AI3E MANNING INLET (FT) (FT) (�'P) MATERZAL (£T) (FT) n TYPE 1 66.70 66.58 24.00 1 RCPE 4.42 2.83 .012 CONVENTIONAL 2 I 3 ... q 5 I 6 2 CDRRSNT 11ATE: 01-03-2004 FILE DATE: 01-01-2004 � CURRENT TIME: 18:05:17 FILE NAT1E: DAVISI PERFORMhNCE CURVE FOR CULVERT R 1 - 1 ( 4.916667 HY 2.B33333 J �RCPE DI9- HEF�p- SpLyT OUTLET �. CFIIIRGB 1fATER CONTROL COMfROL FLOW NOW9\L CRITICAL OVTLET TASLiPATER FLOW ELEV. DEPTH DEPTH TYpE DEPTH DEPTH VEL. DBPTH VEL. DEPTH (cfn) �ft) (ft) (ft) <£9> (fq (ft) (fps) (ft) (fpal (ft) 0 66.70 0.00 0.00 0-NF 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 � 6 67.66 0.80 0.96 3-Mlt 0.53 0.60 1.94 0.98 1.60 0.98 12 67.86 1.16 1.16 1-S2n 0.74 0.87 5.60 0.74 1.90 1.2? 18 68.15 1.45 1.45 1-92n 0.92 1.07 6.32 0.92 2.10 1.48 ' 25 68.42 1.72 1.72 1-S2n 1.07 1.25 6.50 1.12 2.26 1.65 31 68.68 1.98 1.98 1-S2n 1.21 1.91 6.91 1,28 2.39 1.79 �' 37 6B.91 2.21 2.21 1-S2n 1.34 1.56 7.28 1.42 2.50 1.92 43 69.14 2.44 2.44 1-92n 1.47 1J0 7.60 1.55 2.60 2.03 46 69.25 2.55 2.55 1-S2n 1.53 1.76 7.77 1.61 2.65 2.09 55 69.59 2.89 2.89 5-52n 1.71 1.94 8.22 1.80 2.77 2,23 � 62 69.82 3.12 3.12 5-92n 1.83 2.05 8.51 1.91 2.85 2.32 ' E1. inlet face invert 66.70 ft E1. outlet invert 66.58 ft E1. inlet Lhzoat invett 0.00 ft 61. inlet crest 0.00 ft . '� .s.+,.. SITE DATA '+•x« CULVEAT INVERT x.ae,.�..�...:i♦ ' INLET STATION (FT) 0.00 INLET ELEVATION (FT) 66.70 . OUTLET STATION (Pf) 29.00 ,� 09TLET BLEVATION (FT) 66.58 NUMBSR OF BARABLS 1 9LOEE (V-FT/N-FT) 0.0050 � CULVERT LENGTH ALONG 3LOpE (FT) 29.00 � +�::� ClTLVERT DATA SUlMARY "kw�+.�er�t�atw�aktwR�t�� BARREL 9HAPE BLLIPTSCW, BARREL 9PAN 4.42 FT BARREL RISE 2.83 FT . HARREL MATERIAL CONCRETE '� HARRE7, MANNING'S N 0.012 INLET TYPE CONVENTIONAL INLET SDG6 AND i�17.L GROOVBD END WITH f6A0iPALL INLET DEPRES3ION NONE � � 3 � CURRENT DATE: 01-03-2004 EILE DATE: 01-01-2009 CURRENT TIM6: 18:05:17 FILE NAME: DAVISI � TAIL5PATER w"""` REGVI.AR CHANNEL CRO9S 9ECTION **k�«�*k***«•� SIDB SLOP6 H/V (X:1) 4.0 -� r CHANNEL SLOPS V/H (FT/FT) 0.005 . bWNNING'S N (.01-0.1) 0.040 CHANNEL INVERT ELEVATION (FT) 66.58 CULVERR NO.1 OUTLET INVERT ELEVATION 66.58 FT ^ +��wat �=pORM FLO➢P RATING CURVS FOA DOWNSTRFJIM CHANNEL FLOSP iP.3,E. FROUDE DEPTN �y_ gt¢�[y (CFS) (FT) NUygER (FT) (FPS) (P9F) 0.00 66.SB 0.000 0.00 0.00 0.00 � 6.15 67.56 0.285 0.98 1.60 0.31 12.30 67.85 0.297 1.27 1.90 0.90 18.46 68.06 0.305 1.48 2.10 0.46 � 24.61 68.23 0.311 1.65 2.26 0.51 30.76 68.37 0.315 1.79 2.39 0.56 - � 36.91 66.50 0.319 1.92 2.50 0.60 43.06 68.61 0.322 2.03 2.60 0.63 46.14 68.67 0.323 2.09 2.65 0.65 55.37 68.81 0.327 2.23 2,77 0.70 � 61.52 68.90 0.329 2.32 2.85 0.73 1 � CURFtENT DATE: 01-03-2009 ��RREA^f TIt�: 18:06:30 FILE DATE: 01-01-2004 ' FILE NAME: DAVI32-3 FH4PA CULVERT ANPyySIS � HY-8, VERSION 4.1 � � SITE DATA I CULVERT 3HAPE MP.T6RIpL Zt77,ET � � � 7. INLET OUTLET CULVERT � 9pRggLS � V I EI.EV. ELCV. LENGTA SHAPg (Fy,) (E,1,) SFN1 RISE MpMJING INLET (FT) I MATERIAL (FT) (FT) n TYPE 1 I 67.68 66.90 156.00 1 ftCPE 3.17 2.00 .012 CONVHNTIONAI. 2 � I 3 � 4 6 I I 2 �URRENI' DATE: 01-03-2004 FILE DATE: 01-01-2004 � CURRENT TIME: 18:06:30 FILE NANIL+: DAVIS2-3 PERFORMANCE CURVE FOR CULVERT k 1 - 1 ( 3.166667 BY 2 J RCPE DIS- HZP.D- INLET OUTLST � CHARGE 17ATER CONTROL CONTROL FT,077 NOAMAL CRITICAL OVTLET TASL➢iATER FLOW ELEV. DEPTH DBPTA TYPE DEPTH DBPTH VEL. DEPTH VEL. DEPTH (cfs) (ft) (ft) �ft) <F4> (ft) �ft) (fpe) (ft) (fpa) (ft) , � 0 69.82 0.00 2.14 0-NF 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2_92 3 69.83 0.57 2.15 9-FFL 0.39 0.42 0.51 2.00 0.00 p_9p � 5 69.86 0.82 2.18 4-FFt 0.54 0.61 1.02 2.00 0.00 p_92 8 69.91 1.03 2.23 9-FEt 0.6'! 0.76 1.53 2,00 0.00 2,92 10 69.98 1.22 2.30 4-FFt 0.78 0.88 2.04 2.00 0.00 Z,9y ^ 13 '70.07 1.40 2.39 4-FFt 0.88 1.00 2.55 2.00 O.pO 2,92 16 70.18 1.56 2.50 4-FFt 0.98 1.10 3.06 2.00 0.00 Z,9y 18 70.31 1.72 2,63 4-£Et 1.07 1.20 3.58 2.00 0.00 Z,9p `, p�,Z 20 70.38 1.80 2.70 4-gFt 1.12 1.24 3.84 2.00 0.00 2,92 ''� � 29 70.62 2.04 2.9g q-FFt 1.25 1.37 4.60 2.00 0.00 p,9p �� 26 70.81 2.20 3.13 4-FFt 1.35 1.45 5.11 2 00 0 00 2,92 61. inlet fece invert � 67.68 ft E1. outlet invert 66.90 ft E1. inlet tiuoat invert 0.00 ft E1. inlet creat 0.00 Et '�`+" 9ITE DATA t*•** CULVERT INVERT �+'+:w...«...x.. INLET 9TATION (FT) 0.00 ZNLET ELEVATIpN (FT) 67.68 �UTLET 9TATZON (p'p) 156.00 � OUTLST BlEVATION (PT) 66.90 NUlIDER OF BARRgLS � 1 SLOPE (V-FT/H-FT) 0.0050 CULV6RT L@NGTH ALONG 9LOP8 (FT) 156.00 ^ "+'� CULVSRT DATA 3UAANRY �+'+a��xtk�:�wt«:�*ri��R• �ARREL 3NApe ELLIPTICAL BARftBL 3PAN 3.17 FT BARRBL RISE 2.00 FT � BNtREL FF�TERIAL CONCRETE BARREL MAMNING'3 N 0.012 INLST TYPE CpJJVgNT20NAL INLST 2DGE AND Wp],L GROOVED 6ND SPITH HL+ADSypLL INLET DSPR69SION NONE 3 '� CURRENT DATE: 01-03-2004 FILE �DATE: 01-01-2004 CURRL'NT TIME: 18:06:30 FILE NHME: DAVI32-3 � TAILIPATER CONSTANT NATER 9URFACE EL6VATION � 69.82 1 CURRENT DATE: OS-03-2009 FILE DATE: 01-01-2009 � CIIRRENT TIM6: 17:55:19 FILE NAME: DAVI54 FHWA CULVERT ANALySIS ^ HY-8, VER9ION 4.1 � UI 3ITE DATA � CULVCRT 9HAPE, MpTERIP.L, INLgT � L INLET OVTLET CULVERT � BARREyg � � V ELEV. ELEV. LENGT2t SHApE 9PAN RISE MANNING INLET (ET) (FT) (FT) I tN�TERIAL (FT) (FT) n TYPE 1 67.88 67.70 36.00 1 RCP 3.00 3.00 .012 CONVENTIONAL 2 I 3 .� 4 6 � 2 CURRENT DATE: 01-03-2004 £ILE DATE: 01-01-2004 � CURRENT TIME: 17:55:19 FILE NAME: DAVI94 PERFORMANCE CURVE FOR CULV$RT # 1 - 1 ( 3 BY 3 ) RCP DIS- F�AD- INyET OUTLET � CHARGE WATER CONTROI, CONTROL FLO9P NORMAL CAITICAI. OVTLET TASLi�1TER FLOW ELEV. DEPTH DEPTH TYPB DEPTH DEPTH VEL. DEPTH VEL. DEPTH (cfs) (fi) (ft) (ft) <F9> (ft) (ft) (fps) (ft) (fpa) (ft) � 0 67.88 0.00 0.00 0-NP 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 � 9 68.63 0.75 0.75 1-32n 0.52 0.59 4.27 0.52 1.40 0.80 7 68.98 I.10 1.10 1-S2n 0.74 0.83 5.04 0.76 1.66 1.04 11 69.29 1.41 1.41 1-32n 0.93 1.03 5.77 0.93 1.84 1.21 14 69.55 1.67 1.67 1-92n 1.00 1.20 6.25 1.08 1.98 1.35 1B 69.78 1.90 1.90 1-92n 1.22 1.35 6.61 1.22 2.09 1.46 � 21 69.99 2.11 2.11 1-S2n 1.35 1.49 6.94 1.35 2.19 1.57 25 70.18 2.30 2.30 1-92n 1.48 1.61 7.21 1.48 2,y7 1.66 29 70.37 2.49 2.49 1-S2n 1.60 1.73 7.45 1.60 2.35 1.74 30 70.41 2.53 2.53 1-52n 1.63 1.76 7.50 1.63 2.37 1.76 _ 36 70.72 2.84 2.84 1-32n 1.85 1.94 7.82 1.85 2.49 1.90 E1. inlet face invert 67.88 ft E1. outlet invert 67.70 £t E1, inlet throat invert 0.00 ft E1. ialet cxeet 0.00 ft � "«•* gITE DATA +***+ CUI�VERT INVERT R•wr�:x...+�... INLET STATION (FT) 0.00 . INLET ELEVATION (FT) 67.88 � OUTLET 3TATION (FT) 36.00 WTL6T ELEVATION (FT) 67.70 � 11UMBER OP BARR@LS 1 SLOPE (V-FT/H-FT) 0.0050 CVLVERT LENGTH ALONG SLOPE (FT) 36,00 � t�x�� CULVERT DATA SUlMARY x+w:ta�rt+�tx�:�+.�i��*+• BARREL 9HApE CIRCULAR BARREL DITMETER 3.00 FT BARREL MATERIAL CONCReTE BARAEL MAN[aING'5 N 0.012 � INS�ET TYPE CONVENTIONAL INlST EDGE AND 1WLL GROOVSD EMD IN wearrornry INLET DEPRSS3ION NONE 3 "' CURRENT DATE; 01-03-2004 FILE DATE: 01-01-2004 CURAENT TITIl:: 17:55:14 FILE NW�: ppy�S4 ,., TAILWAPER `��'i`• RBGULAR CH)WNgL CR039 9ECTION •**t*+***•�*•+«+ 9IDE 97.OPH H/V (X:1) q p �, CHANNEL SLOPE V/H (PT/kT) 0.005 I9INNING'3 N (.01-0.1) 0.040 CH7WNgL INVERT ELEVATION �FT) 67.70 CULVERT NO.1 OUTLET INVERT ELEVATION 67.70 FT � "`""'+ UNIPORM PLO➢T ppTZNG CURVE FOR DOSPN3TREMS CHANNgL FL�17 SB.S.E. FROUDE DEPTH VEL. 9HEHR (CFS) (FT) HUD1g@R (FT) (FPS) (PSF) 0.00 67.7� 0.000 0.00 0.00 0.00 � 3.58 68.50 0.275 O.BO 1.40 0.25 7.16 68.74 0.287 1.04 1.66 0.32 10.73 68.91 0.295 1.21 1.84 0.38 14.31 69.05 0.300 1.35 1.98 0.42 ^ 17.B9 69.16 0.309 1.46 2.09 . 0.46 21.97 69.27 0.308 1.57 2.19 0.99 25.05 69.36 0.311 1.66 2.27 0.52 28.62 69.49 0.314 1.74 2,35 0.54 29.50 69.46 0.314 1.76 2.37 0.55 � � 35.78 69.60 0.318 1.90 2.q9 p,sg i CURAENT DATE: 01-03-2004 FILE DATE: 01-02-2004 .� CIJRF2ENT T1ML: 18:02:05 FILE�NAME: DpVTS5 FH9PA CULVERT ANpJ,ySIS HY-B, VyRSION 4.1 � SITE DATA � CULVERI' SHAPE. MATERIN,. IA7LET � U L INLET OUTLBT CULVERT pp(�gLg + V ELEV. ELEV. LENGTH SHAPE 9PAN RISE MAN[7ING INLET (E'T1 (FT) (ET) MpTERIAL (FT) (FT) n TYPE I 1 68.32 67.98 77.00 1 RCP 3.00 3.00 .012 CONVy+NTIONAL 2 I I 3 I 9 � 6 I I 2 CURAENT DATE: 01-03-2009 FI7.E ➢pTE: 01-02-2004 � CURIYENT TIME: 18:02:05 FILE NAMC: DAVI35 PERFORMANCE CVRVE FOR CULVERT # 1 - 1 ( 3 HY 3 ) RCP D23- H�pp- IpygT OUTLET � . � CHARGB NATLR CONTROL CONfROS. FLOW NORMAL CRITICAL OUTL6T TAILIWTER FLO➢T ELEV. DEPTH DEPTH TYPE DEPTH DEPTH VEy. DEPTH VEL. D6PTH (cfs) (fq (ft) (ft) <£4> (ft) (ft) (fpe) (ft) (fps) (ft) 0 70.72 0.00 2.q0 0-NF 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 2.74 � 3 70.74 0.69 2.42 3-A�lt 0.49 0.53 0.45 p,7g 0.00 2.74 6 70.76 1.01 2.44 3-Mlt 0.71 0.77 0.91 p,7q 0.00 p.74 9 70.79 1.29 2.q7 3-Mlt 0.89 0.95 1.36 2.7g 0.00 2.74 12 70.83 1.53 2.51 3-Mlt 1.03 1.11 1.82 2.7q 0.00 2,7q 15 70.B8 1.75 2.56 3-Mlt 1.16 1.25 2.27 2.7g 0.00 2.74 � 18 70.93 1.95 2.61 3-Mlt 1.29 1.37 2.73 2.74 0.00 p,7g 22 71.07 2.13 2.75 3-Mlt 1.41 1.49 3.18 2.7q 0.00 p.7q 25 71.14 2.29 2.82 3-Mit 1.52 1.59 3.62 2.74 0.00 2.74 28 70.78 2.46 2.46 1-52n 1.63 1.70 7.05 1.63 0.00 2.7g 31 70.93 2.61 2.61 1-32n 1.75 1.80 7.23 1:75 0.00 p.7q ' �81. inlet face invezt 68.32 ft 51. outlet inveit 67.98 ft E1. inlet throet invert 0.00 ft E1. inlet czest 0.00 Et � "`�R* SITE DATA �*��* CULVERT INVERT ••x��*+tr.wRt�• INLET 9TATION (FT) 0.00 INLET ELSVATION (FT) 68.32 OUTLET STATION (FT) 77.00 � ^ OUTygT ELEVATION (FT) 67.98 NUPffiER OF HARRByg 1 SLOP6 (V-£T/H-FT) 0.0044 CULVERT LENGTH ALONG SLOPE (FT) 77.00 � �"" CULVHItT DATA SUIMfARY '•*�'**+�t*•*��3+k>r�+.+ BARREL 9HAPE CIRCUYAR BARREL DINSETER 3.00 £T BARREL MATERIAL CONCRETE 6ARREL FIIINNING'3 N 0.012 � INLET TYPE CONVENTIONAI. ZNLET EDGE AND WALL GROOVED END PRO�IECTION INLST DEPRE39ION NONB 3 � CURRENT DATE: 01-03-2004 FILE DATE: 01-02-2004 CURRENT TII�: 18:02:05 � FIS,E NAME: ILA�V295 ' TAILA*ATEA CON3TANT iPATBR SURgAC6 ELEVATION � 70.72 � i � CURRENf DATE: 01-02-2009 FILE DATE: 01-02-2004 CUARENT TIM�: 10:07:33 FILE NAME: DAVIS6 FHWA CULVERT ANAyySIS � HY-8� VER9ION 4.1 uI STTg DATA � CULVERT 3HAPE, M�TERW, INLgT � 7. INLBT OUTLBT CULVERT � BARqgyg � V ELEV, ELEV. LENGTH 9HApE 9PAN RISE MqNNING INLET I (FT) (�) (FT) MATERIAL (FT) (FT) � n TYpE 1 I 70.65 70.28 74.00 1 RCP 1.50 1.50 .012 CONVENTIONAL 2 I I _ 3 4 5 I 6 2 CURAEp11' DATE: 01-02-2004 FILE OATE: 01-02-2004 � CVRRENT TIt�: 10:07:33 EILE NAME: DAVI36 PERFORMANCE CURVE FOR CULVERT A 1 - 1 ( 1.5 HY 1.5 ) RCP DIS- HEAp- INL6T OUTyET "' CAARGE iQTER CONTROL CONTROL FBOSP NORMAL CRITZCAL OVTLET TAILiPpTER FLOPi EL6V. DEPTH �EPTH TYP6 DEPTH DEPTH VEL. DEPTH VEL. DEPTH (cfs) (ft) (ft) (ft) Ggg> (ft) (ft) (fpa) (ft) (fpn) (ft) � 0 70.65 0.00 0.00 0-NF 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 71.01 0.36 0.36 1-32n 0.26 0.27 2.70 0.26 0.88 0.90 1 71.17 0.52 0.52 1-92n 0.37 0.39 3.27 0.37 1.05 0.52 2 71.31 0.66 0.66 1-32n 0.97 0.49 3.65 0.47 1.16 0.61 Z '71.44 0.79 0.79 1-92n 0.54 0.57 3.95 0.54 1.25 0.68 � 3 71.55 0.90 0.90 1-32n 0.62 0.69 4.18 0.62 1.32 0.73 3 71.64 0.99 0.99 1-32n 0.68 0.70 4.39 0.68 1.38 0.79 . '9 71.74 1.09 1.09 1-92n 0.75 0.'!6 4.55 0 JS 1.44 0.83 5 71.82 1.17 1.17 1-S2n O.B1 0.82 9.71 0.81 1.98 O.BB 5 71.90 1.25 1.25 1-S2n 0.87 0.87 4.84 0.87 1.53 0.92 � 6 72.04 1.33 1.39 3-Mlt 0.93 0.92 4.82 0.95 1.57 0.95 E1. inlet face invert 70.65 ft E1. outlet invert 70.28 ft E1. inlet ihroat invert 0.00 ft E1. inlet creat 0.00 ft r ""� SITE DATA *•"*• CULVERT INVERT R'*t*x*�+t•*•R � INLET 9TATION (FT) 0.00 INLET ELBVATION (FT) 70.65 OUTLST STATION (FT) 74.00 "" OOTLET ELBVATION (PT) 70.28 NIIMBER OF BARR$LS y 9LOPB (V-FT/H-FT) 0.0050 CULVERT LENGTfi ALONG 3LOPE (FT) 74.00 � **`•• CULVERT DATA SUlPSARY �*+�++++..*..�...+...,.t�� 6ARR6L 9HAPE CIRCULAR BARREL DIAMETSR 1.50 E'T BNtREL MATERIAL CONCRETE �„ HARREL MANNING'S N 0.012 INLET TYPE CONVENTIONAL INLET HDGB AND I�LL GROOVSD SND IN wanmmanrL INLET DEPRE9SION NONE 3 ^ CUAAENT DATE: 01-02-2004 FILE DATE: 01-02-2004 C�1�RENT TITfE: 10:07:33 FILE NAME: DAVIS6 TAILYPATER � +•a••"• RSGULAR CNANNEL CR0.49 SECTION **•*«..e.x.w.+.+ 3IDB 9LOPE H/V (X:1) 4.0 CHANNgL 9LOPE V/H (FT/pT) 0.005 '� D7ANNING'S N (.01-0.1) 0.040 CWWJ7gL INVERT ELEVATION (FT) 70.28 CULVERT NO.1 OUTLET INVERT ELEVATION 70.2B FT „� '�'tk`* UNIFOFM FLOSY RATING CURV6 ppR DOWNgTREAM CHANNgL FLWP W.S.E. N'ROUDE DEPTk7 VEL. 9NEAR (CPS) (FT) NUt�ER (FT) (FPS) (P9F) 0.00 70.28 0.000 0.00 0.00 0.00 ,� 0.57 70.6B 0.245 0.q0 0.88 0.13 1.14 70.80 0.256 0.52 1.05 0.16 1.71 70.89 0.263 0.61 1.16 0.19 2•28 70.96 0.268 0.68 1.25 0.21 2.85 7�.01 0.271 0.73 1.32 0.23 � 3•42 '71.07 0.275 0.79 1.38 0.25 3.99 71.11 0.277 0.83 1.49 0.26 4.56 71.16 0.279 0.88 1.98 0.27 5.13 71.20 0.281 0.92 1.53 0.29 - - 5.70 71.23 0.283 0.95 1.57 0.30 i � CURRENT DATE: 01-01-2009 FILE DATE: 01-01-2004 CURREti1' TIME: 16:41:06 £ILE NAME: DAVIS7 FHWA CULVERT ANpLy923 � �HY-8, VERgION 4.1 � I SITE DATA I Ci7LVERT SHAPE, MpTERIAL IIdJ,gT � I U L I �8T OVTLST CULVSRT BARRgyg � �.. V EL&V. ELEV. LENGTH SHAPE SP]{N RISE DWypING INLET � (FT) (FT) (FT) MATERIAL (FT) (FT) n TYPB 1 66.15 65.77 3B.00 1 RCPE 3.75 2.42 .012 CONVENTIONA7, _ I 2 I 3 4 5 I I 6 ^ ' 2 CURR6H7' DA'fH: 01-01-2004 £ILE DATE: 01-01-2004 � CURRENT TIME: 16:41:06 FILE NAME: DAVIS7 PERFORMP.NCE CVRVS FOR CULVERT p 1 - 1 ( 3 JS BY 2.416667 ) RCPE DIS- HCpp�- INyET OIiTLHT � CHARGE 1PATER CONTROL CONTROL FLqP NORHN, CRITICAL OUTLET TA3LWhTER FL� ELEV. DEP'fA DEPTH TYPE DEPTN DEPTH VEL. DEPTH VEL. DEPTH (cfs) (ft1 (ft) (ft) <F4> (ft) (ft) (fps) (ft) (fps) (ft) 0 67.70 0.00 1.55 0-NF 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.93 � 4 67.79 0.61 1.69 3-Mit 0.34 0.47 0.56 1.93 0.00 1.93 7 67.81 0.88 1.66 3-Tf1t 0.50 0.68 1.11 1.93 0.00 1.93 11 67.85 1.10 1.70 3-Mlt 0,61 0.84 1.67 1.93 0.00 1.93 14 67.91 1.33 1.76 3-Mlt 0.72 0.98 Z,pp 1.93 0.00 1.93 18 67.70 1.55 1.55 1-S2n 0.80 1.10 7,35 0.86 0.00 1.93 � 21 67.89 1.74 1.74 1-S2n O.BB 1.22 7.69 0.96 0.00 1.93 25 68.07 1.92 1.92 1-92n 0.96 1.32 7,97 1.05 0.00 1.93 28 68.22 2,07 2.07 1-S2n 1.03 1.42 8.22 1.14 0.00 1.93 3Z 68.38 2.23 2.23 1-32n 1.30- 1.51 8.46 1.23 0.00 1.93 ^ 35 68.53 2.38 2.38 1-S2n 1.17 1.60 8.74 1.30 0.00 1.93 E1. inlet face invert 66.15 ft el. outlet invert 65.77 ft E1. inlet thxoat invert 0.00 ft E1. inlet crest 0.00 ft � x+.x. SITE DATA *�•�R CUSVERT INVERT «w..,.......... INLET $TATION (FT) 0.00 INLET ELEVATION (FT) 66.15 OUTLET 9TATION (ET) 38.00 � OUTLET SLEVATION (ET) 65.77 NI7MBER OF BARREL9 1 SlOPE (V-FT/H-FT) D.O100 CULl2RT LENGTH ALONG SLOpE (FT) 38.00 � +�;++ CULVERT ➢ATA 9UHIMRY rt+t�x�w��a�:��rt:�r+• BARREL 9HAPE BLLIPTICAL BARREL SPAN 3.75 � BARREL RISE 2.92 FT 9ARREL M1ITERIAL CONCRETE � BARAEL FWNNING'S N 0.012 INLHT TYPE CONVHMPIONAL IM.ST EDG6 AND 4WI,L GAOOVED 2ND PROJSCTING INLET DSPRES3ION NONE 3 � CURRENT ➢ATE: 01-01-2004 FILE DATE: 01-01-2004 CUARENT TIME: 16:41:06 FILg NAME: DAVIS7 � TAILA*ATER CON9TANT 1PATER 3URpACE SLEVATION -� 67.70 .. ' APPENDIX D � 421 21",Suite 212,Longmwrt,Co,80501 (303)772-7052;FAX 651-7226 � 5� � N � M � � �,'.��:O O O ti T.., i� � � �:� . �� ' N lN 1� �M � '�.� `-y'N R � -�. (�O ja.�.:N N [V ��117 I�� i�yR4 �' �'"`p N � ' �:�N �,W � � , �i�O O � �� . � �� : � �_.f0 Y�] N ��`V " l�JNO - � N '�".�. h � y' � t}�,� _ T' �� 'r +�. ..'� N N ..� . O � V � .�� N �h �:N � f�O a �'0�O � � � m O � � N J � y � �: e �. N O� �p � � f0 a0 V � r , � (V M � '. 1�= ti � ,� '/� � � � C o r �/I �. N M n y � x O "' Z = 4 � � 0 C ��5'") Z aooc 2 0 a 4�z Q ' '� � _ _ = W � � � � FV- `�,� U y �oo� o � p � o V ^ � � W `� � - LL a O W x,.� — Y � m .=,w Q i ~ �' N C� a � - a � �, ,� � o � �p v� C U t� V Z °�-;.- N � S ��O V� a � � �. y W 2 w Q a� � W � � � a U� W N � J s O J � a � PL1902 Oversized Maps Located in Back of Original File Not Scanned Hello