The URL can be used to link to this page

Browse Search

Home My WebLink About20060254.tiff Weld County Referral 111k. September 28, 2005 COLORADO The Weld County Department of Planning Services has received the following item for review: Applicant Sonja Stonestreet Case Number PZ-1095 Please Reply By October 26, 2005 Planner Sheri Lockman Project PUD Sketch Plan for Nine (9) Residential Lots (Waterford Hill PUD). Legal Pt of Lot 2 of RE-2690; pt SE4 of Section 31, T8N, R67W of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado. Location /z mile north of CR 86 and west of and adjacent to CR 15. Parcel Number 0555 31 000048 The application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Please reply by the above listed date so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Any response not received before or on this date may be deemed to be a positive response to the Department of Planning Services. If you have any further questions regarding the application, please call the Planner associated with the request. Please note that new information may be added to applications under review during the review process. If you desire to examine or obtain this additional information, please call the Department of Planning Services. Weld County Planning Commission Hearing (if applicable) December 6, 2005 ❑ We have reviewed the request and find that it does/does not comply with our Comprehensive Plan ❑ We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests. oar See attached letter. t_ L Comments: '' Iran .t i b-jrrifil '11Y1 ^ e j�hllfd Dr iIDA4LAS}- VVh* is yvI lti • M 1 e4 19.{v p04-4.pfort La.!-j MAil .S11nSat mileal Om . sit or ail IAnaCart.. rhai-uKaA tenatA Alta babas Signature Date I04,0,0C Agency P 1-• LI I r,.tt ca • •:•Weld County Planning Dept. ❖918 10th Street, Greeley,CO.80631 •4(970)353-6100 ext.3540 4(970)304- HIBR 2006-0254 1 CLIl Weld County Referral September 28, 2005 Wilge. COLORADO The Weld County Department of Planning Services has received the following item for review: Applicant Sonja Stonestreet Case Number PZ-1095 Please Reply By October 26, 2005 Planner Sheri Lockman Project PUD Sketch Plan for Nine (9) Residential Lots (Waterford Hill PUD). Legal Pt of Lot 2 of RE-2690; pt SE4 of Section 31, T8N, R67W of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado. Location 1/2 mile north of CR 86 and west of and adjacent to CR 15. Parcel Number 0555 31 000048 The application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Please reply by the above listed date so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Any response not received before or on this date may be deemed to be a positive response to the Department of Planning Services. If you have any further questions regarding the application, please call the Planner associated with the request. Please note that new information may be added to applications under review during the review process. If you desire to examine or obtain this additional information, please call the Department of Planning Services. Weld County Planning Commission Hearing (if applicable) December 6, 2005 ❑ We have reviewed the request and find that it does/does not comply with our Comprehensive Plan We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests. C See attached letter. Comments: Signature C Gr>a Date ////%/vS Agency ❖Weld County Planning Dept. +918 10th Street, Greeley,CO.80631 ❖(970)353-6100 ext.3540 +(970)304-6498 fax DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES ratl BUILDING INSPECTION PHONE (970)353-6100, EXT.3540 FAX (970)304-6498 WELD COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 918 W. 10t° Street Greely, CO. 80631 COLORADO Applicant: Sonja Stonestreet Project: PUD Sketch Plan for (9) lots with Residential Lots Legal; Pt re-2690, pt e4 fo section 31 T8N,R67Wof lot of the 6th P.M.Weld County Colorado Case Number: PZ-1095 1. Building permits shall be obtained prior to the construction of any building. Buildings that meet the definition of an Ag Exempt Building per the requirements of Section 29-1-20 and Section 29-3-20 B.13 do not need building permits, however a Certificate of Compliance must be filed with the Planning Department and an electrical and/or plumbing permit is required for any electrical service to the building or water for watering or washing of livestock or poultry. 2. A plan review is required for each building except for buildings that meet the definition of Ag Exempt buildings. Plans shall bear the wet stamp of a Colorado registered architect or engineer. Two complete sets of plans are required when applying for each permit. 3. Buildings shall conform to the requirements of the codes adopted by Weld County at the time of permit application. Current adopted codes include the 2003 International Building Code; 2003 International Mechanical Code; 2003 International Plumbing Code; 2002 National Electrical Code and Chapter 29 of the Weld County Code. 4. Each building will require an engineered foundation based on a site-specific geotechnical report or an open hole inspection performed by a Colorado registered engineer. Engineered foundations shall be designed by a Colorado registered engineer. 5. Building height shall be limited to the maximum height allowed per Table 503. Wall and opening protection and limitations shall be in accordance with Table 503 Separation of buildings of mixed occupancy classifications shall be in accordance with Table 302.3.2 and Chapter 3. Setback and offset distances shall be determined by the Zoning Ordinance. 6. Building height shall be measured in accordance with the 2004 International Building Code for the purpose of determining the maximum building size and height for various uses and types of construction and to determine compliance with the Bulk Requirements from Chapter 24 of the Weld County Code. Building height shall be measured in accordance with Chapter 23 of the Weld County Code in order to determine compliance with offset and setback requirements. Offset and setback requirements are measured to the farthest projection from the building. Weld County Code in order to determine compliance with offset and setback requirements. Offset and setback requirements are measured to the farthest projection from the building. 7. A Flood Hazard Development Plan shall be submitted for buildings constructed within the 100-year flood plain. Sincerely, Frank Piacentino Plans Examiner Weld County Building Inspection Dept. a 111) Weld County Referral ISeptember 28, 2005 Co COLORADO The Weld County Department of Planning Services has received the following item for review: Applicant Sonja Stonestreet Case Number PZ-1095 Please Reply By October 26, 2005 Planner Sheri Lockman Project PUD Sketch Plan for Nine (9) Residential Lots (Waterford Hill PUD). Legal Pt of Lot 2 of RE-2690; pt SE4 of Section 31, T8N, R67W of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado. Location 1/2 mile north of CR 86 and west of and adjacent to CR 15. Parcel Number 0555 31 000048 The application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Please reply by the above listed date so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Any response not received before or on this date may be deemed to be a positive response to the Department of Planning Services. If you have any further questions regarding the application, please call the Planner associated with the request. Please note that new information may be added to applications under review during the review process. If you desire to examine or obtain this additional information, please call the Department of Planning Services. Weld County Planning Commission Hearing (if applicable) December 6, 2005 ❑ We have reviewed the request and find that it does/does not comply with our Comprehensive Plan ❑ We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests. See attached letter. Comments: Signature ��N an/1c ) 2144/444:7* k4Date /0 /3 /d5 Agency tti • +Weld County Planning Dept. +918 10th Street, Greeley, CO.80631 +(970)353-6100 ext.3540 +(970)304-6498 fax 10/3/05 TO: Sheri Lockman, Planner FROM: Lin Dodge, Building Tech RE: PZ-1095 — WATERFORD HILL PUD Referral Notes for PZ-1095 — Waterford Hill PUd 1. Weld County Code Ord. 2003-6, Section 2-13-70-H limits north-south cul-de-sacs to be identified as "Way"and east-west cul-de-sacs as "Place". WATERFORD HILL PUD Developer: Mary Barstow/Stonestreet Case # PZ-1095 Planner: Sheri Lockman PT SE4 31-8-67 ZONED PUD/ESTATE IS NOTIN FLOOD PLAIN (0475D) NORTH WELD COUNTY WATER DISTRICT INDIVIDUAL SEPTICS XCEL ENERGY POUDRE VALLEY REA QWEST WINDSOR RE-4 AULT FPD FT COLLINS PO 9 LOTS W/ESTATE USES AND 1 OUTLOT FOR DETENTION POND PRELIMINARY ADDRESSING Lot 1 42245 Waterford Hill Drive Lot 2 42248 Waterford Hill Drive -or- 42248 Waterford Hill Court Lot 3 42252 Waterford Hill Court Lot 4 42254 Waterford Hill Court Lot 5 42249 Waterford Hill Court -or- 42252 Waterford Hill Drive Lot 6 42256 Waterford Hill Drive Lot 7 42260 Waterford Hill Drive Lot 8 42257 Waterford Hill Drive Lot 9 42253 Waterford Hill Drive OUTLOT 42247 Waterford Hill Drive Lin Dodge,Building Technician Building Department 918 10'"Street Greeley CO 80631 Phone:(970)353-6100,extension 3574 Fax: (970)304-6498 E-Mail:(dodge@co.weld.co.us STATE 01- COLORADO OFFICE OF THE STATE ENGINEER ----Division of Water Resources � )epartment of Natural Resources T 1313 Sherman Street, Room 818 Ai »�� Denver,Colorado 80203 �1g78� Phone(303)866-3581 October 1:1,2005 FAX(303)866-3589 Weld County Plann• Bill Owens www.water.state.co.us GREELEY OFF`' , Governor Russell George Executive Director Ms. Sheri Lockman OCT 1 7 2005 Hal D.Simpson,P.E. Weld County Planning Department State Engineer 918 10th Street RECEIv . Greeley, Co 80631 Re: Waterford Hill PUD Case No. PZ-1095 SE1/4 of Sec. 31, T8N, R67W, 6th P.M Water Division 1, Water District 3 Dear Ms. Lockman: We have reviewed the above referenced proposal to subdivide a 29.7-acre parcel into 9 single-family residential lots averaging 2.5 acres in size. The State Engineer's Office previously commented on this subdivision by our letter dated June 15, 2005 (copy enclosed)when the proposal was submitted as Watershed PUD. The Water Supply Information Summary Form included in the referral material indicates that the water requirements for the subdivision are 5,625 gallons per day (6.30 acre-feet per year). The water use estimate appears to be high compared to a typical estimate based on an average of 3.5 persons per dwelling and 80 gallons per person per day. No outside uses were identified for any of the 9 residential lots. The proposed water source for this subdivision is still identified as the North Weld County Water District("District"). A letter of commitment for service from the District was not provided. A copy of a draft Water Service Agreement("Agreement")was included in the referral material. According to the information from the Agreement, the District will furnish 70% of an acre-foot (228,000 gallons) of water per tap per annual water year if the allotment for the Colorado-Big Thompson (CBT) project water, as determined by the Northern Colorado Water Conservancy District, is 50% or greater. The District will restrict the delivery as necessary when the CBT allotment is less than 50%. Based upon recent updated information (dated September 29, 2005) provided to this office by the District, the District currently has an adequate uncommitted water supply to provide the water associated with this project. Since no changes in the water supply for this subdivision were identified in this submittal, the comments from our letter dated June 15, 2005 still apply. If you have any question in this matter please contact loana Comaniciu of this office. Sincerely, r7 Dick Wolfe, P.E. 6 Assistant State Engineer cc: Jim Hall, Division Engineer George Varra,Water Commissioner, District 3 Water Supply Branch DwfIC/Waterford Hill PUD STATE OF COLORADO OFFICE OF THE STATE ENGINEER oc c Ototrs Division of Water Resources �ti Department of Natural Resources vs� 1313 Sherman Street,Room 818 G:� i * Denver,Colorado 80203 June 15, 2005 *1876.• It Phone(303)866-3581 FAX(303)866-3589 Weld County Planninn • '10t Bill Owens www.watecstate.co.us GREELEY OF- Governor O C T 1 7 2005 Russell George Executive Director Ms. Sheri Lockman Weld County Planning Department ` t Hal D.Simpson,P.E. 918 10th Street R E C E I V ,_i State Engineer Greeley, Co 80631 Re: Watershed PUD Case No. PK-1095 SE1/4 of Sec. 31,T8N, R67W, 6th P.M Water Division 1,Water District 3 Dear Ms. Lockman: We have reviewed the above referenced proposal to subdivide a 29.2-acre parcel into 9 single- family residential lots ranging in size from 2.5 acres to 2.91 acres. A Water Supply Information Summary Form was not included in the referral material. • The proposed water source for this development is identified as the North Weld County Water District("District"). A letter of commitment for service from the District was not provided. According to the information provided, the developer has verbal agreement for water from the District. Based on current information on file in this office, the District will typically furnish 70% of an acre-foot (228,000 gallons) of water per tap per annual water year if the allotment for the Colorado-Big Thompson (CBT) project water, as determined by the Northern Colorado Water Conservancy District, is 50% or greater. The District will restrict the delivery as necessary when the CBT allotment is less than 50%. Pursuant to Section 30-28-136(1)(h)(II), C.R.S., the State Engineer's office offers the opinion that • with the District as the water supplier, the proposed water supply may be provided without causing material injury to existing water rights and the supply is expected to be adequate, provided the applicant obtain a letter of commitment for service from the District for this development. We recommend that the County obtain a signed copy of the water service agreement from the District prior to the final approval of the subdivision. If you have any question in this matter please contact loana Comaniciu of this office. ce), Wolfe, P.E. Assistant State Engineer cc: Jim Hall, Division Engineer George Varra, Water Commissioner, District 3 Water Supply Branch Subdivision File DW/IC/Watershed PUD a wok/��/nR�lF/�9Id County Referral • '`�tY p��D�par� Off X � "cF men, September 28, 2005 2005 COLORADO �� The Weld County Department of Planning Services has received the following item for review: Applicant Sonja Stonestreet Case Number PZ-1095 Please Reply By October 26, 2005 Planner Sheri Lockman Project PUD Sketch Plan for Nine (9) Residential Lots (Waterford Hill PUD). Legal Pt of Lot 2 of RE-2690; pt SE4 of Section 31, T8N, R67W of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado. Location 'A mile north of CR 86 and west of and adjacent to CR 15. Parcel Number 0555 31 000048 The application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Please reply by the above listed date so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Any response not received before or on this date may be deemed to be a positive response to the Department of Planning Services. If you have any further questions regarding the application, please call the Planner associated with the request. Please note that new information may be added to applications under review during the review process. If you desire to examine or obtain this additional information, please call the Department of Planning Services. Weld County Planning Commission Hearing (if applicable) December 6, 2005 ❑ We have reviewed the request and find that it does/does not comply with our Comprehensive Plan ❑ We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests. See attached letter. Comments: Signature ' / Date /o///S/ N,DAgency / C— +Weld County Planning Dept. +918 10"Street, Greeley,CO.80631 4(970)353-6100 ext.3540 4(970)304-6498 fax 3729 Cleveland Avenue P.O.Box 100 Wellington,Colorado 80549 Telephone: (970)568-3612 Fax: (970)221-4659 North Poudre Irrigation Company October 6,2005 61/4/,; Weld County Planning Dept. 06-1:elel 14,r Greeley,10th Street O 80631 Attn: Sheri Lockman,Planner 4� T4.'�O�Ce'er°,4f Fe s Dear Sheri Lockman, FO I have received the PUD Sketch Plan for Waterford Hill by Sonja Stonestreet and have only the following comments: 1. The Cactus Hill Ditch easement should be 35' on either side of the centerline unless covered by a duly recorded easement/right-of-way document,a copy of such should be produced for our information. Unless a formal easement or right-of-way document exists North Poudre Irrigation Company has a`prescriptive' easement with no specified width extending on both sides of the centerline of the ditch. 2. The potential lot owners adjacent to the Cactus Hill ditch should not interfere, impede, or restrict the Company's access, use of,or maintenance of our ditch easement. This could include but not limited to these examples; vinyl fencing,gates,planting of trees,the restriction of burning the ditch,the application of herbicides to control weeds,use of the ditch road for any other than the operation and maintenance of the Cactus Hill Ditch. It has proven beneficial for prospective purchasers of the lots to contact me and discuss in more detail the relationship that exists between the Ditch Company and lot owner. It you could assist in the passing this information on to others I would appreciate it very much. Sincerely, 251 :2___Le Stephen R. Smith Manager (ilitts") Weld County Referral Weld County Planning Department GREELEY OFFICE September 28, 2005 € OCT X 6 2005 COLORADO RECEIVED The Weld County Department of Planning Services has received the following item for review: Applicant Sonja Stonestreet Case Number PZ-1095 Please Reply By October 26, 2005 Planner Sheri Lockman Project PUD Sketch Plan for Nine (9) Residential Lots (Waterford Hill PUD). Legal Pt of Lot 2 of RE-2690; pt SE4 of Section 31, T8N, R67W of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado. Location 1/2 mile north of CR 86 and west of and adjacent to CR 15. Parcel Number 0555 31 000048 The application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Please reply by the above listed date so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Any response not received before or on this date may be deemed to be a positive response to the Department of Planning Services. If you have any further questions regarding the application, please call the Planner associated with the request. Please note that new information may be added to applications under review during the review process. If you desire to examine or obtain this additional information, please call the Department of Planning Services. Weld County Planning Commission Hearing (if applicable) December 6, 2005 ❑ We have reviewed the request and find that it does/does not comply with our Comprehensive Plan ❑ We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests. X See attached letter. Comments: Signature f 1 Date 0 - ' - Os Agency \,.) Le +Weld County Planning Dept. +918 101h Street, Greeley,CO.80631 ❖(970)353-6100 ext.3540 ❖(970)304-6498 fax I 0 0) U) '7 W N N 0) C C 0) w O O O E O 0) QO a) d U a) 72- N O E o ._._ _...._._ ca in 0 E _ t 0 O O « I >, 0) C T o N O U) N c J = O O O G) 0 0 0 0 U u) > a zzz >- zzzz 2 'm J CC ___ I C -c O m 2 N c c H -o U p �" N N N a) >.o ._ i — o. I ≥ O Q a 0 0 0 N O c0 IU) (f) U) co to U I U Q ToN O m d O liiU I = (EE '13_ 00 0 T c a) O m > > LT, > y w U a) ._ Q) O O r t COU) :.� U) N n > 0 o L _.I „ rn 2 p N t p Op I N 00 - m ca 3 ? m c N a�in o u`°) TO O N 2 a) 0 t- y 0 T> v U 3 a 0 m = O rn 2 co U U) _.f:. 17 coY m — N c c m c m H 0 C 0 0 U O r.-m .� .a) .C C > n o C p3 3 m a>) t° w 4; '.G :;.J ,iJ Cl) O L _.__ N ) « U cu N r o o o t...L I -O W > 2 "NO O N N co W <x n (nWC Vf L' E z O N IN w a) z N E Cl) n) EEEIE E i_ o N - L co co co co m o = O U `- R J J J J J, T 0 rn -_iI - ~ -O -o m sic o = aa' _ o O c o15 O) ', C N. (0 o a (/) W@!) U) TTU) aU 2 U) I- O L co O 0) 0) N E C -0 lE CO O o c c, c c m talc z m d CO CO > IL LL IL la a (q (A lL wl in- 0 C N Ti E U 5 a) O'., 'I m f6 � i T,_ Y l z N c: c I : N N a) T ,.� _ ,O O O T T O O a) N C O d w O O N N d 0) N 2 O ,T ie N C QZz!0000 o 0 O O Z ' IQ _. ... C ` r O NI= CI 0 wr r°Di v v 004 lion aNi n ° o c as - CUIaM: 2 I a' 0 0 I Q a 0) n a 2 ,. Applicant: Sonja Stonestreet pi_. \D AS Harmer: Sheri Lockman Case Number: -RE- 258 '13-1/N\it - _4a La e --- ��47 63 N � � 53 \� 47 WCR 15� 'I /�_ 34 47 38 47 38 �� ) � , t 61 '-' 1 V � 3, 38 -- 61 4 \ ' �7 X48 i 52 \38 53 / CR 86 2 �/ X47 47_ N �2 31 32 33 �� , Legend ------- Property Boundary* Lakes — — Highways Soil Types — — Major roads r"-.-.-_ Rail Road A' Local roads Floodplains 1 V Streams&Ditches Boundaries are estimated OCT-31-2005 MON 12:48 PM WINIISOR SCHOOL DISTRICT FAX NO. 97L686 5280 P. 01 WELD COUNTY RE-4 WINDSOR, COLORADO 80550 Phone:970-686-8000 Fax: 970-686-5280 Memo To Mary Barstow/Sonya Stonestreet From: John Karbula,Superintendent of Schools Co Sheri Lockman(planner) Date: 10/31/05 Re: Waterford KIN PUD(Case U P1(4095) In reference to a letter from Mary Barstow dated 9/29/05: As noted in Brian Lessman's initial comments,the district will require cash in lieu of land dedication in the amount of$10,931.13. This may as requested by Mr. Barstow,be collected at the building permit stage. As regards the bus stop and bus turnaround:our typical requirement is for a turning radius of 80'. The planned bus stop has a radius of 46',considerably more than we require. Further discussion will be required to finalize this element of the plan. Please contact my office should an appointment be required. •Pagel OCT-31-2005 MON 02:20 PM WIN OR SCHOOL DISTRICT FAX NO. 97,(,686 5280 P, 01 a (it Weld County Referral • September 28, 2005 C. COLORADO The Weld County Department of Planning Services has received the following item for review: Applicant Sonja Stonestreet - Case Number -PZ-1095 Please Reply By October 26, 2005 Planner Sheri Lockman Project PUD Sketch Plan for Nine(9) Residential Lots (Waterford Hill PUD). - Legal Pt of Lot 2 of RE-2690; pt SE4 of Section 31,TaN, R67W of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado. Location Ya mile north of CR 86 and west of and adjacent to CR 15. Parcel Number 0555 31 000048 The application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Please reply by the above listed date so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Any response not received before or on this date may be deemed to be a positive response to the Department of Planning Services. If you have any further questions regarding the application, please call the Planner associated with the request. Please note that new information may be added to applications under review during the review process. If you desire to examine or obtain this additional information, please call the Department of Planning Services. Weld County Planning Commission Hearing (if applicable) December 6, 2005 ❑ We have reviewed the request and find that it does/does not comply with our Comprehensive Plan ❑ We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests. See attached letter. Comments: V'Gstt '.teLic 'FO trawovtht attend Si' cad has isfves S Tv .gci to f.7,'a gna s snt4 ark n(A e; \owi o4inl cca►-iM ui 4'1A ppvne>wt.4-' 10;921. Coed 6/14/OS) - Signature • Date O131 /D5 Agency U • rA Ce w+1 Sala!). OriikoJt' VZ1r-N • +Weld County Planning Dept. +918 10'^Street,Greeley,CO.80631 -(97D)353.6100 ext.3540 4(970)304.6498 fax OCT-31-2005 MON 12:48 PI1 WIND OR SCHOOL DISTRICT FAX NO. 970,688 5280 P. 02 ��.,� 1719 East Mulberry EJ 1 Fort Collins, Colorado 80524 xchange 970-221-1428 OCT 03 2005 September 29, 2005 John Karbula Superintendent Weld County School District RE-4 1020 Main St. Windsor, Co. 80550 Dear John, T understand from Stephanie that you would be willing to collect the cash in lieu of land dedication fees for Waterford Hill at the building permit stage. I really appreciate your consideration on this. Please note that this is the arrangement in your referral comments back to Weld County Planning. Enclosed is a copy of Brian Lessman's referral from June showing a per lot fee of$1,214.57. Also enclosed is a 8"a l 1"of the entry showing the bus turnaround and shelter. The paved radius is 42' with an additional 4" shoulder for a total radius of 46'. Please feel free to contact Mike Ketterling at KBN Engineers if you have any questions. Thanks again. Sincerely,,, ,, C? Mary Barstow . Agent for Sonya Stonestreet (970)227-2725 Specializing in land development and real estate investments. NOV-08-2005 TUE 02: 17 PM WINDSOR SCHOOL DISTRICT FAX NO, 970 686 5280 P. 01/01 WELD COUNTY RE-4 WINDSOR,COLORADO 80550 Phone:970-6868000 Fax:970-686-5280 Memo To Sherry Lockman From John Karbula, Superintendent of Schools CC: Data 11/7/OS Re Waterford Hill PUP(Casa 1$P2.1095) • In speaking with engineer Michael Ketterling, I have made a dear determination that plans he has FAXED to me meet all bus tum-around requirements as set by Weld County School District RE-4. • Previous communication(dated 10/31)regarding these standards was a result of not having proper information, Information Mr.Ketterling has now provided. • Please proceed with the knowledge that the bus turn-around meets our standards and that we will,as previously stated, require cash-in-lieu of land dedication In the amount of$10,931.13 •Page 1 6O c;.4%,:, *eye co County Referral 1/4(ek 111 I OCT ZD/CFpa'4ea/ September 28, 2005 005. C. F COLORADO The Weld County Department of Planning Services has received the following item for review: Applicant Sonja Stonestreet Case Number PZ-1095 Please Reply By October 26, 2005 Planner Sheri Lockman Project PUD Sketch Plan for Nine (9) Residential Lots (Waterford Hill PUD). Legal Pt of Lot 2 of RE-2690; pt SE4 of Section 31, T8N, R67W of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado. Location /2 mile north of CR 86 and west of and adjacent to CR 15. Parcel Number 0555 31 000048 The application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Please reply by the above listed date so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Any response not received before or on this date may be deemed to be a positive response to the Department of Planning Services. If you have any further questions regarding the application, please call the Planner associated with the request. Please note that new information may be added to applications under review during the review process. If you desire to examine or obtain this additional information, please call the Department of Planning Services. Weld County Planning Commission Hearing (if applicable) December 6, 2005 We have reviewed the request and find that it does/does not comply with our Comprehensive Plan O We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests. O See attached letter. Comments: Signature Date i olef ps Agency i�0 a v rY Sficteeref l of C.s a ❖Weld County Planning Dept. ❖918 10th Street, Greeley, CO.80631 4(970)353-6100 ext.3540 ❖(970)304-6498 fax Weld County Sheriff's Office M e mo To: Sheri Lockman From: Ken Poncelow Date: October 28,2005 Re: PK-1095 The Sheriffs Office recommends the following improvements for this housing sub-division: 1. The Sheriffs Office requests that builders and developers designate an area by the entrance of the sub-division in which to place a shelter for school children awaiting the school bus. This area should also include a pull off for the school bus which enables it to safely load and unload children out of the roadway. 2. Either mail distribution within the sub-division or a central drop off location within the sub-division should be developed so that residents do not have to cross a county road to obtain their mail. 3. A permanent sign should be placed at the entrance to the subdivision detailing the name of the sub-division,address,and a graphical presentation of the roadways within the subdivision. There should be a plan developed to maintain this sign. 4. If the roadways within this sub-division are not maintained or adopted by the county, individuals purchasing property in this sub-division should be notified that the Sheriffs Office will have limited traffic enforcement powers. 5. A plan should be developed to maintain roadways within the sub-division especially during inclement weather conditions for emergency vehicles. 6. The Sheriffs Office is very supportive of homeowner funded homeowner's associations. These associations provide a contact for the Sheriffs Office and a means of maintaining common areas. 7. If there are oil or gas production facilities within this sub-division,they need to be fenced off in order to mitigate the potential for tampering. These facilities are known to create an attractive nuisance for young people. Tampering not only creates a significant danger to safety but also of environmental damage with extensive mitigation and clean-up costs. 8. The names of all streets within the sub-division should be presented to the Sheriffs Office for approval. This will eliminate duplication of street names within the county. 9. The Sheriffs Office encourages Law Enforcement Authorities to provide additional funding for law enforcement requirements in the future. The Sheriffs Office lacks the ability to absorb any additional service demand without the resources recommended in the multi-year plan provided to the Weld County Board of County Commissioners or as 1 indicated by growth not considered at the time the plan was developed. I have no other comments on this proposal. • Page 2 STATE OF COLORADO R. Bill Owens, Governor `p1A e O DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES b Weld County Planning Department DIVISION OF WILDLIFE ;a4y AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER GREELEY OFFICE O40F`t' Bruce McCloskey, Director OCT 2 8 2005 For Wildlife- 6060 Broadway Tenver,hone: (3ado03) 80216 RECEIVED For People Telephone: 1303) 297-1192 October 20,2005 Sheri Lockman—Planner Sonja Stonestreet-Applicant Weld County Planning Department 5429 E. Weld County Road 58 918 10th Street Fort Collins, CO 80524 Greeley, CO 80631 RE: Case Number PZ-1095 Dear Sheri, I received and reviewed the proposal for the PUD sketch plan for nine residential lots(Waterford Hill Estates). During the review, Troy Florian-District Wildlife Manager,made a site visit to the parcel. In this letter you will find the Division of Wildlife comments concerning the proposal. The site is located west and adjacent to WCR 15 and % mile north of WCR 86. The field appears to be an actively farmed Alfalfa hay field irrigated by a Center Pivot Sprinkler system, with homes surrounding the area. The Division of Wildlife recommends that: -Initial construction occur between August 15 and April 1 to prevent the destruction of nesting wildlife. -Construction equipment be cleaned and a weed management plan is used to reduce the spread of weeds. -Any fences built are three or four strand fencing with a bottom strand height of 17 inches and a maximum top strand height of 42 inches, along with installation of double stays between posts. -Leash covenants be used in the development. -Future homeowners are made aware of nuisance wildlife in the area. The mixture of heavy vegetation and bare ground makes for desirable nesting habitat for many of the ground- nesting birds. Human activities around these nests can have negative impacts on them. It is recommended that any construction that takes place on the site occurs before April 1 and after August 15 to minimize any impacts that human activity may have on these nests. With new construction taking place and machinery being transported from one site to another, it is important to help prevent the spread of noxious weeds. Noxious weeds reduce property value and wildlife habitat. Care should be taken to avoid spreading and introducing noxious weeds. Equipment should be cleaned periodically to remove weed seeds even if no weeds are recognized. The area should be promptly re-vegetated using native species to prevent erosion and invasions by weeds. It is also recommended that a weed management plan be developed from during construction and for a period of at least 5 years after construction. We are concerned for the safety of the wildlife in the area if fences are erected, as some types of fencing can be dangerous and even fatal to wildlife. Therefore,we recommend that if any fencing is to be used within or around development sites,either during or after the project, it should be the type that would allow the free passage of wildlife. Fencing plans should avoid the use of woven wire type fences that will trap or prevent movement of wildlife. The Division of Wildlife prefers the use of three or four strand fencing with a bottom strand height of 17 DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES, Russell George, Executive Director WILDLIFE COMMISSION, Jeffrey Crawford, Chair•Tom Burke, Vice Chair• Ken Ton-es, Secretary Members, Robert Bray•Rick Enstrom•Philip James•Claire 0' Neal•Richard Ray• Robert Shoemaker Ex Officio Members, Russell George and Don Ament inches and a maximum top strand height of 42 inches, along with installation of double stays between posts. The 3-rail vinyl fencing mentioned in the referral would work as well as mentioned above. ^ The residential development should include covenants that prevent domestic dogs and cats running at large. Domestic dogs and cats roaming the open space on this development and adjacent property would have a definite adverse impact on wildlife in the area. CDOW feels strongly that this wildlife corridor encompassing the adjacent upland should be protected from domestic pets of local residents inclined to walk dogs in this natural area. It is recommended that the developer make future homeowners aware of nuisance animals that are found in rural areas. Coyotes,raccoons, skunks, and foxes can all potentially cause problems to landowners. Also, homeowners should be made aware of the potential problems that coyotes and skunks can cause with domestic dogs and cats. The new homeowners should also be made aware that it is their responsibility to prevent and handle any problems that may arise. The Division of Wildlife has brochures available to the homeowners that talk about living with wildlife and will also be happy to give suggestions on how to prevent any potential problems. On behalf of the Division of Wildlife, I would like to thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on this proposal. If you or the applicant have any further questions,please feel free to call Troy Florian at(970)443-1993. cer- /* Cl. i'..on Area Wildlife Manager Cc: Troy Florian, District Wildlife Manager DOW Mike Sherman,Habitat Biologist DOW the Weld County GREELEnni g Department OCT 262005 MEMORANDUM RECEIVED IDPPI CiTO: Sheri Lockman,Planning Department DATE: 25-October-2005 WQFROM: Robert Jacobs, EI., Public Works� COLORADO SUBJECT: PZ-1095 Waterford Hill PUD (Zone Change) Weld County Public Works Department has reviewed this change-of-zone request. Comments made during this phase of the subdivision process may not be all-inclusive, as other concerns or issues may arise during the remaining application process. Comments External Roadways: ❑ This development will introduce 86 additional vehicle trips per day to the off-site roadway system based on 9 single-family residential homes. Based on the proposal and impact on surrounding roads,a traffic study is currently not required. ❑ CR 15 is classified by the County as a local road(Weld County Roadway Classification Plan,June 2002)adjacent to the proposed development requiring a 60-foot right-of-way. The applicant shall verify the existing right-of-way and the documents creating the right-of-way shall be noted on the change of zone plat. If the right-of-way cannot be verified, it will be dedicated on the final plat. o CR 15 serving this development is paved and under the jurisdiction/maintenance of Weld County. o Waterford Hill PUD has proposed to access CR 15. ❑ CR 86 is classified by the County as a local road(Weld County Roadway Classification Plan,June 2002)adjacent to the proposed development requiring a 60-foot right-of-way. The applicant shall verify the existing right-of-way and the documents creating the right-of-way shall be noted on the change of zone plat. If the right-of-way cannot be verified,it will be dedicated on the final plat. o CR 86 adjacent to this development is gravel and under the jurisdiction/maintenance of Weld County. Internal Roadways: ❑ Internal roads are required to meet Weld County criteria for a PUD. The internal roadway right-of-way shall be sixty(60) feet in width including cul-de-sacs with a sixty-five(65)foot radius,and dedicated to the public. o Cul-de-sacs shall be revised on the final plat to reflect this criterion. o Public Works suggests that the entrance gate island should be located such that there is a 100-foot perpendicular `staging' area for vehicles entering and exiting the subdivision,measured from the centerline of CR 15. ❑ The applicant has indicated in the application materials that the internal roadways of the proposed gated community shall be maintained by the homeowners association. o Weld County does not typically maintain roadways within gated communities. ❑ The applicant shall prepare a pavement design prepared by a professional engineer submitted with the final plan materials. ❑ Easements shall be shown on the final plat in accordance with County standards (Sec.24-7-60) and / or Utility Board recommendations. o All easements (front, side, and rear lot, etc...) shall be shown on the final plat in accordance with Chapter 27, Article IX(PUD Mapping requirements)of the Weld County Code. ❑ Intersection sight distance triangles at the development entrance(s) will be required. All landscaping within the triangles must be less than 3'/2 feet in height at maturity,and noted on the final roadway plans. ❑ The applicant shall submit to Public Works stamped,signed and dated final plat drawings and roadway/construction&grading plan drawings for review with the final plan application and approval. Construction details must be included. U Stop signs and street name signs will be required at all intersections and shown as a signing plan on final roadway plans. The current edition of the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices(MUTCD)shall govern the signing plan. U The applicant shall submit Improvements Agreements According to Policy Regarding Collateral for(on-site)Improvements with the final plan application. These agreements must be reviewed by Public Works and shall be approved by the Board of County Commissioners(BOCC)prior to recording any final plat. --------- Page 1 of 2 Drainaee U A final drainage report stamped, signed and dated by a professional engineer licensed in the State of Colorado shall be submitted with the final plan application. The 5-year storm and 100-year storm drainage studies shall take into consideration off-site flows both entering and leaving the development. Increased runoff due to development will require detention of the 100-year storm developed condition while releasing the 5-year storm existing condition. The final drainage report shall include a flood hazard review documenting any FEMA defined floodways. The engineer shall reference the specific map panel number, including date. The development site shall be located on the copy of the FEMA map. ❑ The applicant shall prepare a construction detail for typical lot grading with respect to drainage for the final plan application. Front, rear and side slopes around building envelopes must be addressed. In addition, drainage for rear and side lot line swales shall be considered. Building envelopes must be planned to avoid storm water flows, while taking into account adjacent drainage mitigation. ❑ Final drainage construction and erosion control plans (conforming to the drainage report) stamped, signed and dated by a professional engineer licensed in the State of Colorado shall be submitted with the final plan application. These plans (stormwater management plans)may be based on Urban Drainage methodology. Recommendation ❑ The Public Works Department recommends approval of this change-of-zone based on the above observations. The applicant shall address the comments listed above at the specific step of the review process stated. The review process will continue only when all appropriate elements have been submitted. Any issues of concern must be resolved with the Public Works Department prior to recording the change of zone and final plat.* PC: PZ-1095 Waterford Hill PUD(Zone Change) Email&Original: Planner: Lockman PC by Post: Applicant: Mary Barstow PC by Post: Engineer: Ketterling, Butherus& Norton ________ Page 2 of 2 Q-nn Weld County Referral September 28, 2005 111k. COLORADO The Weld County Department of Planning Services has received the following item for review: Applicant Sonja Stonestreet Case Number PZ-1095 Please Reply By October 26, 2005 Planner Sheri Lockman Project PUD Sketch Plan for Nine (9) Residential Lots (Waterford Hill PUD). Legal Pt of Lot 2 of RE-2690; pt SE4 of Section 31, T8N, R67W of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado. Location /:mile north of CR 86 and west of and adjacent to CR 15. Parcel Number 0555 31 000048 The application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Please reply by the above listed date so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Any response not received before or on this date may be deemed to be a positive response to the Department of Planning Services. If you have any further questions regarding the application, please call the Planner associated with the request. Please note that new information may be added to applications under review during the review process. If you desire to examine or obtain this additional information, please call the Department of Planning Services. Weld County Planning Commission Hearing (if applicable) December 6, 2005 ❑ re have reviewed the request and find that it does/does not comply with our Comprehensive Plan 0 We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests. ❑ See attached letter. Comments: (*an AtL}- ,! ) q,' / ty e(,yll p IL/- ii C/h^/ (COQ all /7O 01,22/6 ones 1201-Cr i. Signature ( ) Date Agency (6,740,1 / ❖Weld County Planning Dept. +918 10th Street, Greeley, CO.80631 +(970)353-6100 ext.3540 ❖(970)304-6498 fax Weld County Planning Department GREELEY OFFICE NOV 2 9 2005 CEIVED Memorandum fTO: Sheri Lockman, W.C. Planning DATE: November 23, 2005 e FROM: Pam Smith, W.C. Department of Publ' _ COLORADO Health and Environment CASE NO.: PZ-1095 NAME: Sonja Stonestreet/Waattershheed The Weld County Health Department has reviewed this proposal. The applicant proposes a 9 lot PUD on 29.2 acres. The minimum lot size is 2.5 acres, and coupled with the overall density of one septic system per 3.2 acres does meet current Department policy. No horses or other farm animals will be allowed on the lots. The application has not satisfied Chapter 27 of the Weld County Code in regard to water and sewer service. The application states the water will be supplied by North Weld County Water District and that a water service agreement has been included in the application materials. However, the Department has not received a copy of this letter. Sewer will be provided by individual sewage disposal systems. The preliminary percolation data (submitted in the Sketch Plan application) conducted by Earth Engineering Consultants and dated March 20, 2002 indicates that most of the site will be suitable for conventional septic systems. In 2002 groundwater was noted at 12 feet or greater; however shallow sandstone was found in the southeast portion of the site, potentially requiring mounded systems. Site-specific percolation tests at the time of development will determine current groundwater and soil conditions. The Department requests that the applicant designate two septic system envelopes on each lot, and that the secondary absorption field envelope be preserved in a manner that will allow its future use. The Department further recommends that language for the preservation and/or protection of the second absorption field envelope shall be placed in the development covenants. The covenants should state that activities such as landscaping (i.e. planting of trees and shrubs) and construction (i.e. auxiliary structures, dirt mounds, etc.) activities are expressly prohibited in the designated absorption field site. The Change of Zone application states that these envelopes will be shown during the final design stage. The Department recommends approval with the following conditions: 1. Water service shall be obtained from North Weld County Water District 2. This subdivision is in rural Weld County and is not served by a municipal sanitary sewer system. Sewage disposal shall be by septic systems designed in accordance with the regulations of the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment, Water Quality Control Division and the Weld County Code in effect at the time of construction, repair, replacement, or modification of the system. 3. Primary and secondary septic envelopes shall be placed on each lot. All septic system envelopes must meet all setbacks. 4. Language for the preservation and/or protection of the absorption field envelopes shall be 1 placed in the development covenants. The covenants shall state that activities such as permanent landscaping, structures,dirt mounds or other items are expressly prohibited in the absorption field site. 5. A stormwater discharge permit may be required for a development/redevelopment /construction site where a contiguous or non-contiguous land disturbance is greater than or equal to one acre in area. Contact the Water Quality Control Division of the Colorado Department of Public Health and the Environment at www.cdphe.state.co.us/wq/PermitsUnit for more information. 6. During development of the site, all land disturbances shall be conducted so that nuisance conditions are not created. If dust emissions create nuisance conditions,at the request of the Weld County Health Department, a fugitive dust control plan must be submitted. 7. In accordance with the Regulations of the Colorado Air Quality Control Commission any development that disturbs more than 5 acres of land must incorporate all available and practical methods that are technologically feasible and economically reasonable in order to minimize dust emissions. 8. If land development creates more than a 25-acre contiguous disturbance, or exceeds 6 months in duration,the responsible party shall prepare a fugitive dust control plan,submit an air pollution emissions notice, and apply for a permit from the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment. 9. "Weld County's Right to Farm" as provided in Appendix 22-E of the Weld County Code shall be placed on any recorded plat. O:\PAM\Planning\chzone\PZ-7095 Watershed.RTF 2 12-22-05; 5:54AM;WOODWARD ;S/0952 rb.s u ii i Ault-Pierce Fire Department P.O. Box 1069 Ault, Co. 80610 To: Weld County Department of Planning Date: 12-21-2005 Waterford Hill P.U.D. The proposed plans for the Waterford Hill P.U.D. have been reviewed by the Ault-Pierce Fire Department with Mike Ketterling. We find the proposed plans for water supply and access to the proposed subdivision to be sufficient for the Fire Department requirements. There are four fire hydrants to be located along the roadway in these specific locations. 1) On the lot line between lots 1 and 2 2) On the north end of lot 2 at the "T" intersection 3) On the lot line between lots 7 and 8 4) On the lot line between lots 4 and 5 There is also a proposed second water supply line, 8 inch in Diameter that will enter the subdivision from WCR 15 between lots 3 and 4 to feed into the main line that travels along the main entrance to the subdivision. Larry Sheets Chief Ault-Pierce Fire !--*1 Hello