The URL can be used to link to this page

Browse Search

Home My WebLink About20060486.tiff 1,174 City&County of Denver JOHN W. HICKENLOOPER Mayor February 7, 2006 Weld County Commissioners Weld County PO Box 758 Greeley, CO 80632 Dear Sir or Madame: Enclosed are Noise Reports for the 4th Quarter of 2005 (October 1, 2005 to December 31, 2005) and the 2005 Annual Report (January 1, 2005 to December 31, 2005) from the Denver International Airport Noise Office. If you have any questions regarding these reports, or if I can be of further assistance, please contact me at (303) 342-2360. Sincerely, Andrea C. Christensen Denver International Airport Aviation Noise Analyst DENVER INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT Department of Aviation Airport Office Building 8500 Pena Boulevard Denver,Colorado 80249 303.342.2200 www.FlyDenver.corn C°"'stNf /16``"'CW 2006-0486 Co-- 13—cc J 'C z 0 DEN NOISE OFFICE E i ! N 4TH QUARTER 2005 i": NOISE REPORT Lw .*A5 JANUARY 31, 2006 5:30 PM FOURTH QUARTER 2005 NEWS INSIDE T rr I s ISSUE The number of potential Class II NEPS violations The number of households registering at least one registered during the fourth quarter of 2005 was complaint decreased by 30%(35 vs.50 in 2004). 4OMS SYSTEM 2 zero. During the fourth quarter 2004,there was Ten households registered a combined 61%of one potential Class II NEPS violation,which oc- total complaints. Please see pages seven and curred at NEPS grid point(E,-1)in Area 3. Please eight for complaint and operational statistics. .TUNE POLICY 3 see page six for NEPS information. Aa°S DEN'sl at esen dusk. ry Terminal at ,.',.. There was no potential 65 DNL noise contour The terminal roof's zEPS AND RMT violation for the quarter. The 65 DNL contour con- outer waterproof shell 4 is made of a Teflon ' tinued to be completely contained within the coated woven fiber glass;the inner mem- boundaries of the City and County of Denver. brane is made of .. '•`- uncoatedwovenfiber " — - -. TN QUARTER 5 Please see page five for DEN contour map. glass. The inner and :r`.;—`_ . CONTOUR outer roof membranes comprise 15 acres of There were 23%fewer noise complaints re- material �. ceived during the quarter,as compared to the **.,EPS TABLE 6 fourth quarter of 2004(207 vs.267 in 2004). E 5ry` cu PLAINT AND 7.9 rERATIONAL HOMEBUYER 'S GUIDE INTIATIVE ATISTlcs Denver International Airport and the DIA Part- community around DIA that understands how the Y UTILIZATION 9 nership are creating a guide and other informa- airport—now and with future expansions—will inter- I tional materials for the real estate community and act with the rapidly growing northeast quadrant of gsq,. for people who may buy homes in the future near the Denver Metro area. Denver International Airport. The specific purpose Modeled after a very successful similar effort is to have communication tools that clearly explain at Washington's Dulles International Airport,this SPECIAL POINTS the benefits of living and working close to the air- OF N T E R E 5 T undertaking will include developing pamphlets port and to tell homeowners what to expect in and web site information that will be made avail- v*;� • terms of planned airport growth,aircraft flight NEPS violations, able to prospective homebuyers during the prop- 1, 6. paths,and noise. The result will be an informed erty buying process. A task force that includes -retions are up,see ., ,„,r .. •, home builders and developers is guiding develop- •• ment of the homebuyer's guide and other commu- page 7. ,r - ' • nication products. plaints are down, ^ Page T �.",.. plaint map,see - - r�" + r ms's 'I F • c` 5 4�.,Wg xC L 3 A5•::' Bringing In the wheat near DEN s. , 3j JCARTER 2005 NOISE REPORT JANUARY 31, 2006 5:30 PM Page2 DEN AIRPORT NOISE AND OPERATIONS SYSTEM The DEN Airport Noise and The DEN ANOMS system In addition,the ANOMS Operations Monitoring System monitors noise levels at 27 system records weather in- e (ANOMS)is a state-of-the-art corn- permanent and 4 portable formation from three remote puter system designed to enable noise monitoring terminals. stations,which include a . I the City and County of Denver to These terminals are located RACAL recording device to monitor aircraft noise in the vicin- throughout the Denver metro record pilot/controller radio t ity of the airport. In addition to area(see map on page 3 for transmissions. i monitoring noise levels,the sys- RMT locations). tem calculates Noise Exposure '- The system also records the Performance Standards.(NEPS) movement of all aircraft in the ;�'Q , *i'" at 101 grid points in Adams •• ' ` County(see map on page 3 for vicinity of DEN by utilizing FAA Remote Monitoring Terminal air traffic control radar data. (RMT)with a weather collect- NEPS locations). ing station. This makes it possible to match actual flights with noise events. ARTSMAP ARTSMAP is a specially de- the data. Currently,ARTS- signed noise modeling program MAP is used at several major that automatically creates noise airports nationally. It allows _` contours. ARTSMAP is designed the DEN Noise Abatement Of- to P MAP is create contours from actual fice to perform noise data "_Igned to radar flight tracks that our office analysis,generate daily auto- r¢g ' - to contours receives from the FAA ARTS sys- mated noise contours,receive tem which is sent via modem, detailed runway utilization,and si actual eliminating the need for manual airline fleet mix identification. 'd"' 8y flight track data manipulation. The ARTS- MAP software is installed on a computer in the Noise Abate- ment Office. The program ana- lyzes,views,reports,and stores - Li-- LAND USE AND ZONING Urban growth and develop- with a 10 decibel penalty ap- land use planning by the ment in the areas surrounding plied to nighttime operations) surrounding jurisdictions,in DEN,particularly non-compatible is a line inside which,under accordance with guidelines residential and other noise- Federal guidelines,no residen- promulgated by the Denver -4141.144 sensitive land uses,is of utmost tial development should occur. Regional Council of Govern- concern to the City and County of The operational 65 Ldn ments and the Denver/ Denver. The Noise Office has Adams County Intergovern- noise contour for the airport,as developed noise contours sur- mental Agreement. Addi- created by ARTSMAP, is in- rounding the airport,inside which tional mapping for DEN that cluded in this report. However, DEN's Terminal tent roof view certain types of land uses are not for DEN,the 60 Ldn noise con- includes the applicable noise from the South. recommended. The 65 Ldn noise contours is available upon tour is used for compatible contour(average decibel level request. t• r,. (,� J1a� ARTER 2005 NOISE REPORT JANUARY 31, 2006 5:30 PM Page3 '�SYt, d.4 Y•_w�.. .. DEN NOISE HOTLINE POLICY The purpose of the DEN Noise system,where specific com- police action. Phone harass- Complaint Hotline is to provide plaints can be matched to indi- ment is a state criminal offense • an opportunity for individuals to vidual flight tracks. It is essen- and can carry a jail sentence express their concerns regarding tial for all information to be en- and/or fine. Threats involving - 4 noise generated by aircraft oper- tered correctly in order for the aircraft and/or the airport are a 6111 ating at DEN. Citizens are asked system to be effective. very serious matter and are a to leave their name,address federal criminal offense. To fiat-Ai-1r. Profanity will not be toler- `: and the date and time of their make a threat,even jokingly, ated,and will result in the com- DEN's FAA Control Tower is complaint on the hotline. Com- will result in a notification to the located on C Concourse. It is plaint not being registered. Any plaints are downloaded daily by Denver Police Department and 327 feet tall,or 33 stories attempt to deliberately tie-up or high. our Noise Analysts and then may involve an FBI investigation. abuse the Hotline may result in transcribed into the ANOMS GLOSSARY OF TERMS Sound: A rapid variation in air Nearly all aircraft sound level posed to a particular Ldn level. pressure,which is perceived by measurement is conducted us- These contour lines are nested the ear and brain as sound. ing A-weighting. in such a way that contours closer to the airport generally Noise: Generally considered to Eauivalent Continuous Sound surround areas that experience be any sound,which is deemed Level(Lea): A measurement of higher noise levels than con- undesirable by an individual. the average sound energy ex- tours farther out. Annual Ldn perienced over a period of time. Decibel: Sound is measured by contours are used to determine pressure or energy This average sound level is ex- its in terms whether certain types of zoning pressed in decibels,and in- of decibels. The decibel scale is or land uses are compatible with cludes a notation of the period logarithmic;when the decibel particular annual Ldn noise lev- level increases by 6 dB,the of time,which it covers(such as els. 65 Ldn is considered by measured sound is twice as Leq(24)for an average of the many federal agencies to be the sound level over a 24-hour pe- loud. level at which residential land riod). Noise Abatement: A measure or use becomes incompatible. Day Night Level(Ldn): Also re- action that minimizes the Remote Monitoring Terminal ferred to as DNL. Similar to a - - amount or impact of noise on (RMT): Consists of a noise level Leq measurement, but is con- the environs of an airport. Noise analyzer,a weatherproof micro- ducted over at least a 24-hour abatement measures include aircraft time span and includes a 10dB operating procedures phone,a system controller,a and a dedicated nighttime penalty. For an Ldn power supply, and use or disuse of certain telephone line to download DEN Arrival runways or flight tracks. These calculation,all noise that occurs g noise data to the ANOMS sys- rocedures at night(defined as 10:00 pm to operating procedures are con- tem,all mounted in a weather- 7:00 am)is artificially increased trolled by the FAA. proof cabinet. for the public's increased sensi- A-Weighted Sound Level(dBA): tivity to noise during these A type of sound level measure- hours. ment which reduces the effect surround- of very high and very low fre- Noise Contour. A line ing an airport that encloses a quencies in order to mimic the response of the human ear. geographic region,which is ex- x ( ,•$'S NOISE REPORT JANUARY 31, 2006 5:30 PM Page4 NOISE EXPOSURE PERFORMANCE STANDARDS (NEPS) GRID COORDINATES, IGA CONTOUR, AND REMOTE MONITORING TERMINAL (RMT) LOCATIONS I 1 s tQ 1 $ w co cc l�Ur' po tg = tt i 4:5"'''''h. OF 3 U c E H � \` Z Z V • I ' F, jae is,CO CO T C Q Q U Q m yc L • ' I— Q - U' U_ O Z N 2 J AT 1 Z L__ 71/1/ . -. ,,:.... :, \ i 1 O xx.a..1. ,a m a v C co �, _ .arm, O � t'''. ,: • .<a- 9-^z § s vat T3 hrt y W4` r L ®` `• a , T .:. \\/ ''Q• • ! W dccW a I Q ! '� , I y��' ,Q_ f i..- i xu' co \ c° • Or cari a s I �% \ ,, '-, 4 s�Y*". m 4' 0 t\ i Q d e I qA ' C7•o S ! •- • �� N•�` a w • �it- AK ce ' �• � a � E v o a ...I__- o , I j • r • • �� • • • //— a v O D i / Z I CI o a �" 6 OT e ry: .4;4•' COS NOISE REPORT JANUARY 31, 2006 5:30 PM , Page5 4TH QUARTER 2005—DEN 65 LDN CONTOUR a N e %o� I 6 0 � ®Weld W i b fs O g 6 of G alia 0®4 : (I . c Dc ) t ® Adams t Wit: 44 Adams -----t------ o u ��' ' .mot o o rV< Rocky Y S Mountain 1-7—• Arsenal _ ►ii' i. Legend ^ e 1 m -...- DEN Property Line j I Il County Boundary a- Noise Contours ED IGA 65 LDN Contour Denver ��. -- DEN 4q05 65 LDN Contour Adams v P Arapahoe Miles aDEN 4Q05 65 LDN Contour 0 0.5 1 2 3 4 : 4 }{AIjARTER 2005 NOISE REPORT JANUARY 3i, 2006 5:30 PM Page6 4TH QUARTER 20O5-DENVER/ADAMS COUNTY IGA NEPS VALUES Area 2 Area 1 4Q05 4Q05 Grid IGA Annual Calculated Difference Grid IGA Annual Calculated Difference Points Leg(24) Leq(24) Leq Points Leq(24) Leq(24) Leg - A,1 38.6 35.7 -3.0 C,4 44.2 35.3 -8.9 A,2 37.6 36.2 -1.4 C,5 36.7 33.6 -3.1 ^ - A,3 42.3 37.0 -5.3 C,6 36.0 32.8 -3.2 r A,4 45.3 37.7 -7.6 D,4 41.1 - 35.1 -6.0 A,5 43.9 38.3 -5.6 D,5 34.2 _ 34.5 0.3 A,6 37.5 38.6 1.1 D,6 36.0 34.2 -1.8 A,7 37.7 39.1 1.4 0,7 41.4 35.0 -6.5 A,8 36.5 37.9 1.4 E,4 38.3 35.1 -3.2 _ M A,9 36.3 35.6 • -0.7 E,5 34.8 35.5 0.7 A,10 37.6 34.6 -3.0 E,6 36.7 34.8 -1.9 A,11 39.2 34.4 : ..--4.8 E,7 41.4 35.1 -8.3: A.12 41.2 33.9 -7.3 F,2 51.7 39.2 -12.5 6,2 39.5 36.7 .-2.8 F,3 43.7 36.0 . -7.7 6,4 42.5 38.3 -4.2 F,5 37.3 - 34.2 -3.1 B,5 43.1 39.1 -4.1 F,6 38.5 34.3 -4.2 _ 6,6 39.0 39.4 •.0.4 F,7 42.1 34.6 -7.5 B,7 39.0 39.8 X0.8 G,2 51.2 39.8 -11.4 - B,8 38.0 38.1 ::0.1 G,3 42.1 - 35.6 -6.5 B,9 38.3 36.0 • 2.3' G,4 40.2 ^ -33.8 -6.4 B,10 39.0 35.7 X3.3 H,2 50.1 40.9 -9.2 _ 6,11 40.4 35.7 -4.7 H,3 46.0 35.9 -10.1 B,12 ` 42.6 35.2 ,-7.4.; H,4 1 46.1 34.1 -12.0 C,2 41.0 37.6 .;:.-3.4,,,, C,3 43.3 38.2 5.1 Area 3 - C,4 43.5 38.9 -4.6 4Q05 C,5 43.4 39.9 -3.5 Grid IGA Annual Calculated Difference T C,6 43.3 40.2 -3.1 Points Leg(24) Leg(24) Leg C,7 43.3 40.6 -2.7 A,-1 38.9 31.8 -7.1 - C,8 42.6 I- 38.4 -4.2 A,0 39.6 32.1 -7.5 C,9 42.2 36.8 -5.5 A,1 43.2 32.7 -10.5 ^C,10 41.6 37.1 -4.5 A,2 45.7 33.7 -12.0 C,11 42.5 36.9 -5.6 A.3 45.6 34.9 -10.8 C,12 44.3 35.8 -8.5 B,-1 37.9 31.4 -6.5 ..D,2 41.7 37.8 -3.9 6,0 39.2 31.7 -7.5 D,3 46.2 38.9 -7.3 8,1 42.6 _ 32.1 -10.5 0,4 -48.4 39.5 -8.9 B,2 45.8 33.0 -12.8 D,5 48.2 40.7 -7.5 6,3 45.7 34.3 -11.4 D,6 46.2 41.3 `-4.9 C,-1 36.7 31.8 4.9 D,7 44.2 41.4 -2.8 C,0 j 37.1 31.9 -5.2 D,8 43.7 38.5 -5.2 C,1 39.5 32.2 -7.3 D,9 43.1 37.9 -5.2 C,2 44.8 33.1 -11.7 D,10 44.9 38.3 -6.6 C,3 46.5 33.9 -12.6 D,11 44.5 37.2 ':-7.3 D,-1 32.6 32.6 0.0 D,12 45.1 35.6 -9.5 D,0 33.3 32.6 -0.8 E,1 42.4 36.7 -5.7 D,1 37.3 32.6 -4.7 E,2 42.2 37.9 4.3 D,2 43.0 I 33.0 -10.0 E,3 46.7 39.6 -7.1 E,-1 31.4 • 32.7 1.3 ~E,4 v 51.2 40.5 -10.7 E,0 33.1 32.3 -0.8 E,5 51.0 41.7 -9.3 E,1 36.2 32.2 -4.0 E,6 44.6 42.6 -2.1 E,2 40.6 32.7 -7.9 E,9 43.1 39.3 -3.8 F,1 36.5 32.1 -4.4 E,10 43.1 38.8 -4.4 F,2 39.4 33.1 -6.3 E,11 46.1 36.9 -9.2 G,1 42.5 33.3 -9.2 41 " �. ARTER 2005 NOISE REPORT JANUARY 31, 2006 5:30 PM, Pagel 4TH QUARTER 2005—DEN COMPLAINT AND OPERATIONAL STATISTICS fi.h..e/Awad .sr MSM.a - ..L.". sbliCofnmunity• No.of No.of No.of No.of Community" Calls Callers Calls Calls 4005 4005 4Q04 4Q03 Total Calls for 4q05 by Community` Arvada 0 0 0 0 Aurora 55 9 65 66 Watkins Bailey 0 0 0 0 Thornton We Westminster Bennett 0 0 2 7 PA �I 3i Aurora Boulder 8 1 9 5 Pro Brighton 15 4 6 13 Northglenn Broomfield 0 0 0 0 14. Castle Rock 0 0 0 1 Commerce City 26 3 14 11 Denver 2 2 3 14 Elizabeth 85 6 68 46 Boulder Englewood 0 0 0 0 4% Evergreen 1 1 9 40 Fort Collins 0 0 0 23 Elizabeth/ Fort Lupton 0 0 0 0 Denver/ qp/ p� Commerce City Brighton Franktown 0 0 0 0 t3% 7% Golden 0 0 0 2 Henderson 0 0 0 50 Highlands Ranch 1 1 0 0 Hudson 0 0 1 1 Top Ten Complainants Vs. All Others Kiowa 0 0 0 0 18% Lafayette 0 0 0 0 Lakewood 1 1 14 63 39% Littleton 0 0 0 6 All Lochbuie 0 0 0 0 1 1% Louviers 0 0 0 1 Others Nederland 0 0 0 2 1% Northglenn 2 2 0 0 8% Parker 0 0 21 270 Pine 0 0 0 0 Thornton 2 2 22 22 2% I 6% Watkins 2 2 2 2 Westminster 7 1 31 23 2% / L5% 5% Wheatridge 0 0 0 0 3%J Overall Total 207 35 267 668 •See map on next page for location of known noise complaints. k 1. ,; i ipstwre 4405 Noise Complaint Calls-Daytime vs. Nighttime 0) z o 2C— 6111 Time Complaint Received cc 2 m o m c` c` m m a m m 4Dth05 2005 through v °, n a m' ,z c 3 er 3 3 October through Januarythrough • .z m rn cr m m December Total December Total Day Hours (7:00 am to 9:59 pm) 64 131 240 206 172 173 193 311 188 114 35 46 195 1,873 Night Hours 11 27 33 30 29 30 43 28 13 6 4 2 12 256 (10:00 pm to 6:59 am) Total 75 158 273 236 201 203 236 339 201 120 39 48 207 2,129 *it I Conitpaileon: 2004 Total Operations vs.2005 Total Operations 5`_000 T X00 08 52065 4947 49744 520000 . - _ __.--_ -- -. .._. _ 48053 __ - _ -5139x_. - -- --- -- - - - 50000 46475 45 518047273 4658947601- - 45382 100 43722_ _. . 48114 47942 45 44028 -- 4 4788 44537 4551G 45521 46083 - - 45100 4227 40000 l i l i i i i -i { --40000 Jai Feb Ma Apr Mw in 11 kg S$J a1 Nov Cec —•-2004 X2005 ' I. TER 2005 NOISE REPORT {�:R JANUARY 31, 2006 5:30 PM Page 4TH QUARTER 2005-DEN COMPLAINT AND OPERATIONAL STATISTICS I r� o.v. m - .. , __� to z ��r .. A 0_ M . m A tr----..j..-‘ ti Z J U O o i Z w ' S U O O r faill•li d °I I � - .l • r ‹,:ig o , •.. • i sae LI, Z �i `1�� s D �i � � i- Ai' , , a I. • i ( .- cot— CO F- . r > of f p z al D 0 I , <1 U • D ro 1 O m ., > Z z • • §j s a$ W CI (, t >sI. z�tiL in 4-`t a ,. 8 )> • +,ar •.AR7ER''2005 NOISE REPORT JANUARY 31, 2006 5:30 PM Page9 4TH QUARTER 2005-DEN RUNWAY UTILIZATION \116R1 ARR 1 I6L� 14 2%! - -- _-_ ARR DEP s , �DEP ARR : 08 n 26'. DEP ARR 04% ', . 298%. .. _. 00P 17♦2 o% i I \17L�ARR 60/ A J ARR ,_ili LL 7 DEP O 1% 63% 15.41 160`4 DEP DEP 1 i DEP I 41°/u 00% ' 1 % ' "' � ARR ! I ARR I / i_ / 21% I /34L1 L34R J I DEP 02 26 4% DEP ARR DEP li DEP ti ARR -- - ' I ARR 07 12[1 32/0 L 00 ai `` 261 /1'+1074 25 I ARR /35L Day Arrivals(7:OOam -9:59pm) Day Departures(7:OOam -9:59pm) 0 35R 0 35R 0 . 0 35 35L •34Ri4 I�34R 034E ■34L O2 time { 025 ■25 \25 ®9R � 0217R •17Lic= .017E 0' 1 1 0 8R EL O L i ❑ 6L u 8 ■8 i t 7 ■7 0 2000 4000 0000 8000 10000 12000 14000 16000 18000 Nvrr' 0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 12000 M000 16000 18000 2 Night Arrivals(10:OOpm -6:59am) I Night Departures(10:00pm -6:59am) 0 35R 035R I 0 35L ❑35L ■34R = ■34R 1 ■34L I ■34L 026 026 ■25 p II 25 •17R ■9R •17L Ill=12112211Ma ■17L 0-6R ill I 0 b O'6L I 0 16E ■8 ■8 ■7 I Ni 0 200 400 600 800 1000 200 1400 BOO 1800 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1800 1800 DEN IS TEN ! February 27,1995. It was called Push Night. Denver International Airport celebrated it's A winter storm threatened. At Denver's worn and 10th year of operation on February 28,2005. S;;:kirr venerable Stapleton and w,the alines haskeleton cut over the first flight n se arrived on a snowy mothrough ng back flight schedules and were keeping skeleton over 350 million passengers have flown through crews. In the evening dusk,lines of tugs hauled DEN. Denver International Airport currently ranks equipment northward in the largest logistical as the fifth-busiest airport in North America and movement of the time outside of a full-scale the 10th-busiest in the world. VISION military mobilization. The last flight of Stapleton left at 9:00 Working together,we will be the tie P Sourer Sunday,February 27th,2005 special Feature to the p.m.that evening,a Continental DC-10 bound Denver Post and the Rooky Mountain News, world's finest airport. non-stop for London's Gatwick Airport. The fol- lowing morning at 6:00 a.m.a United Airlines t�O.Nnno, Boeing 737 from Colorado Springs landed at the st, MISSION first major built-from-the-ground-up airport in the nn'�AA5 United States since the 1970s—Denver Interna- IOtk Sittwiteelsa, Enhancing economic prosperity and 1"5 3005 tional Airport(DEN). quality of life in the Denver region by Shortly thereafter,in a driving snowstorm that connecting its people and products to would have nearly halted operations at the now- the world. closed Stapleton Airport,three aircraft landed simultaneously in near-zero visibility on DEN's three parallel Category Illb ILS(Instrument Land- Leading the aviation industry in safety, ing System)runways,a feat that had never be- service,convenience,efficiency, innova- fore been accomplished at any airport in the tive practices,aesthetics and financial world. strength. Please visit wwwilydenver.com for other DEN Noise Office Reports and information. DENVER INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT `r K. t uievard • NW Corner M!,249 its; S. Y 792200 3 6 .2380 I 1800.417.2988 t :Ili-1 t,4 y�P 2 0 DEN NOISE OFFICE -. , DEN 2005 ANNUAL (ffo,,i4;;;,,kiii,„1:3,40 v ,TWe* NOISE REPORT sct t' A w JANUARY 31, 2006 5:30 PM 2 LU C 2005 IN REVIEW There was one potential Class II violation during year decreased 32%,from 209 in 2004 to 142 in NSD E THIS H l s l s s u F 2005. This was an improvement from the two 2005. The 10 households which registered the potential violations registered in 2004. The loca- highest numbers of complaints per household '.... SYSTEM 2 tion of the exceedance was in Area 3 at NEPS grid accounted for 61%of all complaints received. } point(E,-1). Total aircraft operations at Denver International l` The 2005 65 LDN contour decreased slightly, Airport for 2005 increased by 0.2% compared to Y LINE POLICY 3 particularly to the south. A slight increase was 2004. ,i =' noted to the north compared to the 2004 65 LDN DEN•sleppesen - = e ', WS t Terminal at dusk. P Contour. A small portion of the contour on the a EPS AND RMT MAP 4 The terminal roof's .,.. west side of the airport extended beyond the IGA outer waterproof shell _is made made of a Teflon '-' baseline contour,but was completely contained coated woven fiber within the boundary of the City and County of Den- sass'the inner men. 1--OS ANNUAL 6 Orane is matle of - - �r.� ORT0UR ver. uncoated woven fiber `--- _- _ — . < glass. The inner and - outer root membranes comprise 15 acme of "[ Noise complaints for 2005 decreased by 26% material. NSIEANNUAL NEPS T as compared to 2004. There were 2,129 coin- Sin plaints registered during 2005,versus 2,859 dur- ing the previous year. The number of households 0MPLAINT AND "4`•. [RATI0NAL e_g which registered at least one complaint during the ,�_ATISTICS i"UTutzATioN 10 LAND USE MAP ADOPTION ` Denver International Air- " I THROUGH 4TH 12-19 '^' ___ - __ Y IRTER NEPS TABLES port Design and Planning tr"e DOONTOUR MAPS has adopted a new land use planning contour. This con- / .aa,0°... tour is based on current SPECIAL POINTS modeling and reflects the OF INTEREST. noise impacts that may be `x =NEPS violation,see irt expected from full develop- '.F i Y' ment of Denver Interna- i 7' tional Airport. i •. rations are up,see I _-- 8 You may download a iEn `°°""___ _ k• copy of this map on our web- r--c t plaints are down, site:www. vdenver.com. - - - - - -- - b, it www.flvdenver.com \ yyry jee pages 8' Click on Airport Business ` Wert 0-.9 N Recommended Noise Contours for Land Use Planning ''!Complaint and then follow the Noise T.-.- -- --4.--s-m--......:m.-- ,,,a.v,.. A —*- s location • - Management link to find the ._ra ,-•,see page 9. g new map. The map is in PDF format for easier viewing and printing. 1 •' Please direct any questions about this map to Tom Reed in our Design and Planning Office at 303.342.4498. , r" ,..a + t. ! ' YT0$ ANNUAL NOISE REPORT JANUARY 31, 2006 5:30 PM Paget DEN AIRPORT NOISE AND OPERATIONS SYSTEM The DEN Airport Noise and The DEN ANOMS system In addition,the ANOMS Operations Monitoring System monitors noise levels at 27 system records weather in • - (ANOMS)is a state-of-the-art com- permanent and 4 portable formation from three remote puter system designed to enable noise monitoring terminals. stations,which include a Y , the City and County of Denver to These terminals are located RACAL recording device to monitor aircraft noise in the vicin- throughout the Denver metro record pilot/controller radio t - ity of the airport. In addition to area(see map on page 3 for transmissions. - ' ' monitoring noise levels,the sys- RMT locations). tem calculates Noise Exposure - " . , The system also records the Performance Standards.(NEPS) ',E • ' movement of all aircraft in the :'t-. r' , at 101 grid points in Adams - vicinity of DEN by utilizing FAA County(see map on page 3 for Remote Monitoring Terminal air traffic control radar data. (RMT)with a weather collect- NEPS locations). ing station. This makes it possible to match actual flights with noise events. ARTSMAP ARTSMAP is a specially de- the data. Currently,ARTS- itsigned noise modeling program MAP is used at several major that automatically creates noise airports nationally. It allows contours. ARTSMAP is designed the DEN Noise Abatement Of- ' -TSMAP is to create contours from actual fice to perform noise data re.esigned to radar flight tracks that our office analysis,generate daily auto- E ;to contours receives from the FAA ARTS sys- mated noise contours,receive tem which is sent via modem, detailed runway utilization,and ,ia actual eliminating the need for manual airline fleet mix identification. r *al'flight track data manipulation. The ARTS- MAP software is installed on a "' computer in the Noise Abate- *,y ment Office. The program ana- . ,'.,. .. lyzes,views,reports,and stores --- --- LAND USE AND ZONING Urban growth and develop- with a 10 decibel penalty ap- land use planning by the ment in the areas surrounding plied to nighttime operations) surrounding jurisdictions,in ,er. DEN,particularly non-compatible is a line inside which,under accordance with guidelines .0 residential and other noise- Federal guidelines,no residen- promulgated by the Denver sensitive land uses,is of utmost tial development should occur. Regional Council of Govern- concern to the City and County of The operational 65 Ldn ments and the Denver/ Denver. The Noise Office has Adams County Intergovern- noise contour for the airport,as developed noise contours sur- mental Agreement. Addi- created by ARTSMAP, is in- rounding the airport,inside which tional mapping for DEN that eluded in this report. However, DEN'S Terminal tent roof view certain types of land uses are not for DEN,the 60 Ldn noise con- includes the applicable noise from the South. recommended. The 65 Ldn noise contours is available upon tour is used for compatible contour(average decibel level request. 2005.ANNUAL NOISE REPORT JANUARY 31, 2006 5:30 PM Page3 DEN NOISE HOTLINE POLICY The purpose of the DEN Noise system,where specific com- police action. Phone harass- ` Complaint Hotline is to provide plaints can be matched to indi- ment is a state criminal offense - ' an opportunity for individuals to vidual flight tracks. It is essen- and can carry a jail sentence ' ."VP express their concerns regarding tial for all information to be en- and/or fine. Threats involving - • . { noise generated by aircraft oper- tered correctly in order for the aircraft and/or the airport are a ating at DEN. Citizens are asked system to be effective. very serious matter and are a 'I* ` to leave their name,address federal criminal offense. To h"" "'" {.' Profanity will not be toter- •.w• c"g° and the date and time of their make a threat,even jokingly, ated,and will result in the com- DEN's FAA Control Tower is complaint on the hotline. Com- will result in a notification to the located on C Concourse. It is plaint not being registered. Any plaints are downloaded daily by Denver Police Department and 327 feet tall,or 33 stories attempt to deliberately tie-up or high. our Noise Analysts and then may involve an FBI investigation. abuse the Hotline may result in transcribed into the ANOMS GLOSSARY OF TERMS Sound: A rapid variation in air Nearly all aircraft sound level posed to a particular Ldn level. pressure,which is perceived by measurement is conducted us- These contour lines are nested the ear and brain as sound. ing A-weighting. in such a way that contours closer to the airport generally Noise: Generally considered to Equivalent Continuous Sound surround areas that experience be any sound,which is deemed Level(Leg): A measurement of higher noise levels than con- undesirable by an individual. the average sound energy ex- tours farther out. Annual Ldn perienced over a period of time. Decibel: Sound is measured by contours are used to determine pressure or energy This average sound level is ex- its in terms whether certain types of zoning pressed in decibels in- of decibels. The decibel scale is ,and or land uses are compatible with cludes a notation of the period logarithmic;when the decibel particular annual Ldn noise lev- level increases by 6 dB,the of time,which it covers(such as els. 65 Ldn is considered by Leq(24)for an average of the measured sound is twice as many federal agencies to be the loud. sound level over a 24-hour pe- level at which residential land riod). Noise Abatement: A measure or use becomes incompatible. action that minimizes the Day Night Level(Ldn): Also re- . • . - ferred to as DNL. Similar to a Remote Monitoring Terminal x Nn '+ r' a.• amount or impact of noise on (RMT): Consists of a noise level the environs of an airport Noise Leg measurement,but is con- �xr €=` , P analyzer,a weatherproof micro- T ��..r . abatement measures include ducted over at least a 24-hour n ;Ait,3` ,,,,;a.;r u't time phone,a system controller,a span and includes a 10dB aircraft operating procedures power supply,and a dedicated and use or disuse of certain telephone line to download runways or flight tracks. These calculation,all noise that occurs noise data to the ANOMS sys- at eratin procedures night(defined as 10:00 pm to operating g are con- tem,all mounted in a weather- 7:00 trolled by the FAA. am)is artificially increased proof cabinet. for the public's increased sensi- A-Weighted Sound Level(dBA): tivity to noise during these A type of sound level measure- hours. ment which reduces the effect Noise Contour: A line surround- of very high and very low fre- ing an airport that encloses a quencies in order to mimic the response of the human ear. geographic region,which is ex- - < 0.d -4y;y,rt 4r 2005 ANNUAL NOISE REPORT JANUARY 31, 2006 5 30 PM Page4 NOISE EXPOSURE PERFORMANCE STANDARDS (NEPS) GRID COORDINATES, IGA CONTOUR, AND REMOTE MONITORING TERMINAL (RMT) LOCATIONS zQ 1 i s w y 1 a r Y K .. O O N t O O O + U U I N €G - m o * o Q E c m o M E a t z co co D 0 'a Q Q E o m c r o 5 g '3'. c ..„ i a g u co— I +m) / of L Q I _ y b ply 40( r- O c it r .- CC i Z �\ C o 4) �y I 0 N s ® VI ui 4( t.4,Fyy Gt © S,`Ci' �'Y Zit-, 0) to a' .�y xB!' � L+s' x6+ 1 ;®y 4"-‘0.l a I i �� ', II. Cl Y'..,V521' 0S'ANNUAL NOISE REPORT JANUARY 31, 2006 5:30 PM Page5 .. 2005 Annual Contour and NEPS January 1 , 2005 through December 31 , 2005 Please Note: Does NOT include the impact of extraordinary weather to the NEPS values. OS-ANNUAL NOISE REPORT JANUARY 31, 2006 5.30 PM Page6 ,4,:;,,L:— 2005 ANNUAL — DEN 65 LDN CONTOUR . L c!,__., ,c. N ea _ i a .. ti, �VVeidO W --- .11-4.-- E o o P S ,'- )o R,VC ti, l E fro v cG f c L .) J 1 d cop. ce %i 0y 0 1 Adams ` — ` 1 K , Adams ! 0 r —, ---! r\r"\,..„......__ Rocky i l ' Mountain — I I Arsenal -_. ! , i ` Legend I, G ro DEN Property Line a \ 4 ! 1 County Boundary Noise Contours ` 1-1 IGA 65 LDN Contour Denver � - DEN 2005 65 LDN Contour I, Adams A. ..1 \ist Arapahoe " DEN 2005 65 LDN Contour 0 0.5 1 ri as 2 g Miles 4 * 6.1S5.ANNUAL NOISE REPORT JANUARY 31, 2006 5:30 PM Pagel 1:W 2005 ANNUAL -- DENVER/ADAMS COUNTY IGA NEPS VALUES Area 2 Area 1 2005 2005 Grid IGA Annual Calculated Difference Grid IGA Annual Calculated Difference Points Leg(24) Leg(24) Leg Points Leq(24) Leq(24) Leg A,1 38.6 36.0 -2.6 C,4 44.2 35.9 -8.3 A,2 37.6 36.9 -0.7 C,5 ; 36.7 34.0 -2.7 A,3 42.3 37.7 -4.6 C,6 36.0 33.2 -2.8 A,4 45.3 38.3 -7.0 D,4 41.1 35.5 -5.6 A,5 43.9 39.2 -4.8 D,5 34.2 34.6 0.4 A,6 37.5 39.2 1.7 D,6 36.0 34.2 -1.8 A,7 37.7 39.7 2.0 D,7 41.4 34.9 -6.6 A,8 36.5 38.4 1.9 E,4 38.3 35.5 -2.8 A,9 36.3 36.2 -0.1 E,5 34.8 - 35.5 0.7 A,10 37.6 35.4 -2.2 E,6 36.7 34.7 -2.0 A,11 39.2 35.4 -3.9 E,7 I 41.4 34.7 -6.7 y A,12 41.2 35.0 -6.2 F,2 51.7 41.4 -10.3 - B,2 39.5 37.2 -2.3 F,3 43.7 37.7 -6.0 8,4 42.5 39.0 -3.6 F,5 37.3 34.5 -2.8 B.5 43.1 39.9 -3.2 F,6 38.5 - 34.5 -4.0 B.6 39.0 40.1 1.1 F,7 42.1 - --34.7 -7.4 8,7 39.0 40.4 1.4 G,2 51.2 42.1 -9.1 B,8 38.0 38.6 0.6 G,3 42.1 37.5 -4.6 - 1 B,9 38.3 36.5 -1.8 G,4 40.2 35.0 -5.2 - B,10 39.0 36.3 -2.7 H,2 I 50.1 43.1 -7.0 B,11 40.4 36.5 -3.9 H,3 i 46.0 38.0 -8.0 8,12 42.6 36.0 -6.7 H,4 46.1 - 35.6 -10.5 C,2 41.0 37.9 -3.1 C,3 43.3 38.9 -4.4 Area 3 C,4 43.5 39.6 -3.9 2005 C,5 43.4 40.8 -2.6 Grid IGA Annual Calculated Difference C,6 43.3 41.1 -2.2 Points Leg(24) Leq(24) Leg C,7 43.3 41.2 -2.1 A,-1 38.9 32.5 -6.4 C,8 42.6 38.8 -3.8 A,0 39.6 32.8 -6.9 . C,9 42.2 37.1 -5.1 A,1 I 43.2 - 33.3 -9.9 C,10 41.6 37.5 -4.1 A,2 ; 45.7 34.3 -11.4 . C,11 42.5 37.6 -5.0 A,3 j 45.6 35.6 -10.0 C,12 44.3 36.5 -7.8 B,-1 ; 37.9 32.3 -5.6 D,2 41.7 38.4 -3.3 6,0 I 39.2 32.5 -6.7 D,3 46.2 39.6 -6.6 6,1 42.6 - 33.1 -9.6 D,4 48.4 40.5 -7.9 6,2 45.8 33.9 -11.9 D,5 48.2 41.9 -6.4 B,3 45.7 35.2 -10.5 D,6 46.2 42.2 -4.0 C,-1 36.7 33.0 -3.7 D,7 44.2 41.9 -2.3 C,0 ; 37.1 33.0 -4.1 D,8 43.7 38.8 -4.9 C,1 39.5 33.3 -6.2 D,9 43.1 38.2 -4.9 C,2 44.8 34.2 -10.6 D,10 44.9 38.7 -6.3 C,3 46.5 35.4 -11.1 D,11 44.5 38.0 -6.5 - D,-1 32.6 33.6 1.0 D,12 , 45.1 36.6 -8.5 D,0 33.3 33.7 0.4 _ E,1 42.4 37.6 -4.8 D,1 37.3 33.8 -3.5 E,2 42.2 38.8 -3.4 D,2 43.0 34.2 -8.8 E,3 46.7 40.4 -6.3 E,-1 31.4 - 33.6 2.2 E,4 51.2 41.6 -9.6 E,0 33.1 33.4 0.3 _ E,5 51.0 43.1 I -7.9 E.1 36.2 33.4 -2.8 E,6 44.6 43.7 1 -1.0 E,2 40.6 _ 34.2 -6.5 E,9 43.1 39.6 t -3.5 F,1 36.5 33.1 -3.5 E,10 43.1 39.2 -3.9 F,2 39.4 33.9 -5.5 E,11 46.1 --38.0--1 -8.1 G,1 42.5 34.4 -8.1 ANNUAL NOISE REPORT , ":1, x Cl '55 JANUARY 31, 2006 5:30 PM PdgeB 2005 ANNUAL - DEN COMPLAINT AND OPERATIONAL STATISTICS r',3 1 1 i"ee Complaint Calls by Community* No.of No.of No.of No.of Total Calls for 2005 by Camunityr Community Calls Callers Calls Calls 2005 2005 2004 2003 Nkstminster Arvada 16 1 1 0 5% Aurora 399 22 540 1,063 Thornton Arvada Bailey 0 0 1 0 Parker Two Watkins P/o Bennett 19 2 6 38 3% 1% Awra Boulder 54 3 115 42 Northglenn Brighton 335 17 226 113 'PA 'B% Broomfield 0 0 1 0 Castle Rock 2 1 1 3 Bennett Lakewood Commerce City 230 17 258 91 7 Pk Denver 39 13 53 77 2% Elizabeth 500 10 495 243 Englewood 0 0 0 1 Golden Boulder Evergreen 59 1 151 136 P/ 3% Fort Collins 0 0 28 47 Evelytaet Fort Lupton 0 0 1 2 Franktown 0 0 0 2 3% Brighton Golden 12 4 4 2 8°/ Henderson 2 1 14 63 ElizabethVCommerce City Highlands Ranch 1 1 1 1 Denver 11% Hudson 2 1 8 13 23% 2% Kiowa 1 1 0 1 Lafayette 0 0 0 2 Top Ten Complainants vs.All Others Lakewood 47 2 120 511 Littleton 0 0 1 25 15% Lochbuie 0 0 0 0 14% Louviers 0 0 1 13 Nederland 0 0 4 64 39% All _sigill11% Northglenn 28 9 16 5 omens Parker 54 8 161 1,246 _fr--8% Pine 0 0 0 1 Thomton 203 20 473 325 -5% Watkins 27 5 27 21 3%,---- / \ ------...._5% Westminster 97 2 151 242 1 Wheatridge 2 1 1 1 Overall Total 2,129 142 2,859 4,394 3%� `4% 4% 'See map on next page for location of known noise complaints. lrl tt ;bpfapadrom 2005 Noise Complaint Calls,Daytime vs. Nighttime -n 0 Z O m N E D 0 O o m Time Complaint Received 'c 2 m aC r`o m o `m �' January through ,. R 3 '' ,< m' a- o g g December Total m m m Day Hours (7:00 am to 9:59 pm) 64 131 240 206 172 173 193 311 188 114 35 46 1,873 Night Hours 11 27 33 30 29 30 43 28 13 6 4 2 256 (10:00 pm to 6:59 am) Total 75 158 273 236 201 203 236 339 201 120 39 48 2,129 'IllothiyCOmparlton 2004 Monthly Aircraft Operations vs.2005 Monthly Aircraft Operations 55000 52208 52065 53000_ - _- - __ -_49127 48054 49744 51392- 53000 46475 ggp35 51D0 47273 46599 47601 45362 _447Y� 48111 47942 44028 736 45200=- 45i'6 44527 45931 46083 4`D00 4227 40000 I i I I I I I i I I 40000 Jan Fsb Ma Apr Mw in Al Atg 8aP at NOV DEC ; 1i.t.: ¢,.p 13"ANNUAL. NOISE REPORT JANUARY 31, 2006 5:30 PM Page9 2005 ANNUAL - DEN COMPLAINT AND OPERATIONAL STATISTICS • - z o — I tC . •- Z W zQ z CO p Z W III Q • . Z ' O W O • y;= a \ � aa Q fejt- )- ll Z • le-. • i Ifr..=:! ,r •• Lip• g� _ • • (�' O _i • `y • �`` C � � Z • i' • - & J ita, -.• ` te as • ., • • �r. ., 3,,,,,,-(,..„0:00:is----.,,,,, , _ /_____::. : , i : ,•-•\..- ,• . ,€,_i__ ,,..1 „,,,,,,.., 1� r� F� I• it\ 1 `-/ 1 Z co_ LL LL a w� , a U y / c) CC w z . Z UO O W r 1 a V a JJJ O r z O 1 N .1- 1 '' I `''81c1ANNUAL NOISE REPORT JANUARY 31 2006 5 30 PM Page 10 2005 ANNUAL — DEN RUNWAY UTILIZATION Lid ARR 2 7% _ 08 � P__ —1 C \� �, ARR s DEP DEP �, ARR ---- ---.,— 0.0% v 303%-s 0.0%r. 5.5%. 26. DEP ARR _ 03% 269%, --- 2" DEP 17R/ 00% - -is \_ / 117 5 55 6% i ARR DEP 0.1% 74% 159%. 147% DEP DEP _-._ y DEP 0 0% 1 5% ARR ARR / 11 21% i 34LA 34R; DEP 0 2% 29 5% DEP TARR DEP A ,U DEP ARR �-- ARR J , 14.2%,, / ARR 351.1 `'� (35R, 2004 vs.2005 DEN Daytime Arrivals & Departures 50000 - - - -- 50000 as as .c .c45000 - 45000 m .- II LL 4- 40000 - 40000 p It Vt 35000 I I I I I I I I 35000 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec —s-2004 -4--2005 2004 vs 2005 DEN Nighttime Arrivals & Departures 3500 -- 3500 _I) 3000 - 3000 w LL LL 0 2500 ; - 2500 p It 2000 I I I 2000 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec —s-2004 -4,-2005 V fi S s4"1 J� ANNUAL NOISE REPORT JANUARY 31, 2006 5 30 PM Page11 k Quarterly NEPS Tables and Contour Maps • 1Q05: January 1 , 2005 through March 31 , 2005 (pages 12-13) • 2Q05: April 1, 2005 through June 30, 2005 (pages 14-15) • 3Q05: July 1 , 2005 through September 30, 2005 (pages 16-17) • 4Q05: October 1 , 2005 through December 31 , 2005 (pages 18-19) ,, „ r::"ii,-;1".41,:,,,,:iANNUAL NOISE REPORT JANUARY 31, 2006 5:30 PM Page 12 1,--, 1.!(:4"..-,.•• . .ii...... 15T QUARTER 2005 - DEN 65 LDN CONTOUR �2 u N .. I q ' . 0 ,ti. Weld W _'50`_ E S V / l: \ S mss' Adams 1 . s Adams « ( ...------ /D o :11 VVV Rocky ' Mountain ---- Arsenal --- I �I J.. �: Legend ti• p: '1r t DEN Property Line • \:.) ____ County Boundary Noise Contours Denver L____] IGA 65 LDN DEN1g05 65 LDN Contour r- —1 ij Adams Arapahoe �" DEN 1 q05 65 LDN Contour 0 0.5 1 2 3 47es ,fir.,r,..,;r-, :..; pD5'`Af�RUAL NOISE REPORT JANUARY 31, 2006 5:30 PM Page 13 1ST QUARTER 2005 - DENVER/ADAMS COUNTY IGA NEPS VALUES Area 2 Area 1 1Q05 1Q05 Grid IGA Annual Calculated Difference Grid IGA Annual Calculated Difference Points Leg(24) Leq(24) Leg Points Leg(24) Leg(24) Leq A,1 38.6 j 36.2 -2.4 C,4 _ 44.2 _ 35.1 -9.1 A,2 37.6 36.9 -0.7 C,5 36.7 33.2 -3.5 A,3 42.3 I= 37.9 -4.4 C,6 36.0 32.3 -3.7 A,4 45.3I ~ 38.6 -6.7 D,4 41.1 34.8 _ -6.4 A,5 43.9 39.1 -4.8 D,5 34.2 ' 33.7 -0.5 A,6 37.5 39.1 1.6 D,6 36.0 I 33.3 -2.7 A,7 37.7 39.4 1.7 D,7 41.4 34.2 -7.2 A,8 36.5` 38.4 1.9 E,4 38.3 35.2 -3.1 A,9 36.3 36.1 -0.2 E,5 34.8 - 35.3 0.5 A,10 37.6 34.9 -2.7 E,6 36.7 34.5 -2.2 A,11 39.2 34.7 -4.5 E,7 41.4 34.3 -7.1 A,12 41.2 34.2 -7.0 F,2 51.7 40.8 -10.9 8,2 39.5 37.3 -2.2 F,3 43.7 37.1 i -6.6 B,4 42.5 39.2 -3.3 F,5 37.3 34.6 1 -2.8 B,5 43.1 40.0 -3.1 F,6 38.5 34.7 -3.8 B,6 39.0 39.9 0.9 F,7 42.1 _ 34.9 ; -7.2 8,7 39.0 40.1 1.1 G,2 51.2 41.3 -9.9 - B,8 38.0 38.6 0.6 G,3 42.1 36.9 -5.2 B,9 38.3 36.3 -2.0 G,4 40.2 34.6 1 -5.6 8,10 39.0 35.5 -3.5 H,2 _ 50.1 42.0 i -8.1 8,11 40.4 35.6 -4.8 H,3 46.0 37.1 -8.9 • B,12 42.6 35.0 -7.6 H,4 46.1 35.2 j -10.9 C.2 41.0 37.9 -3.1 C,3 43.3 38.8 -4.5 Area 3 C,4 43.5 39.9 -3.6 1Q05 C,5 43.4 40.9 -2.6 Grid IGA Annual Calculated Difference C,6 43.3 40.8 -2.5 Points Leg(24) Leg(24) Leg C,7 43.3 40.9 -2.5 A,-1 38.9 32.6 -6.3 C,8 42.6 38.7 -3.9 A,0 _ 39.6 32.9 -6.7 - C,9 42.2 36.7 -5.5 A,1 43.2 33.6 -9.6 C,10 41.6 36.5 -5.1 A,2 45.7 34.8 -10.9 C,11 42.5 36.5 -6.0 A,3 45.6 _ 36.4 -9.2 C,12 44.3 35.6 8.7 B,-1 37.9 32.4 -5.6 D,2 41.7 38.5 -3.3 B4O 39.2 32.5 -6.7 D,3 46.2 39.5 -6.8 8,1 42.6 33.1 -9.5 D,4 48.4 40.7 -7.7 B,2 45.8 34.1 -11.7 D,5 48.2 41.9 -6.3 B,3 _� 45.7 35.9 -9.8 D,6 46.2 41.9 -4.4 C,-1 36.7 33.3 -3.4 D,7 44.2 41.5 -2.7 C,0 37.1 _ 33.1 -4.0 _ D,8 43.7 38.7 -5.0 C,1 39.5 _ 33.3 -6.2 _ D,9 43.1 37.4 -5.7 C,2 44.8 _34.1 -10.7 0,10 44.9 37.4 -7.5 C,3 _ 46.5 35.9 I -10.6 D,11 44.5 37.2 -7.3 D,-1 32.6_ 33.6 1.0 0,12 45.1 36.0 -9.1 D,0 33.3 34.3 1.0 E,1 42.4 38.2 -4.2 D,1 37.3 34.2 I -3.1 E,2 42.2 38.8 -3.4 0,2 43.0 34.2 -8.8 E,3 46.7 40.2 -6.6 E,-1 31.4 33.6 2.2 E,4 51.2 41.7 -9.5 E,0 33.1 33.4 0.3 E,5 51.0 43.1 -7.9 E.1 36.2 33.8 -2.4 E,6 44.6 43.1 -1.5 E,2 40.6 34.9 -5.8 ~ E,9 r 43.1 38.4 -4.7 F,1 36.5 T 33.0 -3.5 E,10 43.1 38.2 -4.9 F,2 39.4 I 33.6 -5.8 E,11 46.1 37.6 I -8.5 G,1 42.5 35.2 -7.3 a'r j kiX` y 9,9,0' ANNUAL NOISE REPORT JANUARY 31, 2006 5:30 PM Page 14 2ND QUARTER 2005 — DEN 65 LDN CONTOUR ,t, o N 1 -::-c Weid W --1f�*-- E P S - c r r \ c% ` i l'' Pj b� C-,gyp a ,.s' st J • ;�a� 1 AAdams J i 8 1 , _ Adams _ F.? ___� _ i• �_�r- ------ Rocky Ketow.tajn — - - it �I I _ 'Arsenal _.. 1 _ Legend 2 m DEN Property Line - County Boundary Noise Contours -i IGA 65 LDN Denver ---' -- DEN 205 65 LDN Contour Adams • �t Ns A._v 7 y Arapahoe \. . . mow= Miles DEN 2q05 65 LDN Contour 0 0.51 2 3 4 A'01/4?-'.7 . ANNUAL NOISE REPORT JANUARY 31, 2006 5:30 PM Page 15 2ND QUARTER 2005 - DENVER/ADAMS COUNTY IGA NEPS VALUES Area 2 Area 1 2Q05 2Q05 Grid IGA Annual Calculated Difference Grid IGA Annual Calculated Difference Points Leq(24) Leq (24) Leq Points Leq{24) Leq(24) Leg A,1 38.6 35.9 -2.8 C,4 44.2 36.2 -8.0 A,2 37.6 36.9 -0.7 C,5 36.7 34.4 -2.3 A,3 42.3 37.6 -4.7 C,6 36.0 33.5 -2.5 l A,4 45.3 38.1 -7.2 D,4 4 41.1 35.9 -5.2 A,5 + 43.9 39.2 -4.8 D,5 34.2 34.9 0.7 A,6 37.5 39.2 1.7 0,6 36.0 34.5 -1.5 A,7 37.7 39.3 1.6 D,7 41.4 35.1 -6.3 A,8 36.5 38.5 2.0 E,4 38.3 36.0 -2.3 A,9 36.3 36.4 0.1 E,5 34.8 35.8 1.0 A,10 37.6 35.5 -2.1 E,6 36.7 34.9 -1.8 A,11 39.2 35.5 -3.7 E,7 41.4 34.9 -6.5 A,12 41.2 35.2 -6.0 F,2 51.7 41.7 -10.0 B,2 39.5 j 37.3 -2.2 F,3 43.7 ! 38.2 -5.5 �B,4 _ 42.5 38.7 -3.8 F,5 -37.3 I 34.9 -2.4 6,5 43.1 1 40.0 -3.2 F,6 38.5 34.8 -3.7 B,6 39.0 I 40.0 1.0 F,7 42.1 34.9 1 -7.2 B,7 39.0 40.1 1.1 G,2 51.2 42.6 -8.6 B,8 1 38.0 38.7 0.7 G,3 42.1 38.4 -3.7 8,9 38.3 36.8 -1.5 G,4 40.2 35.9 -4.4 B,10 39.0 36.4 -2.6 H,2 50.1 44.1 -6.0 6,11 40.4 36.6 -3.8 H,3 46.0 39.2 -6.8 B,12 42.6 36.1 -6.5 H,4 46.1 36.6 -9.5 C,2 41.0 37.8 -3.2 C,3 43.3 39.0 -4.3 Area 3 C,4 43.5 39.5 -4.0 2Q05 C.5 43.4 40.9 -2.5 Grid IGA Annual Calculated Difference C,6 43.3 41.0 -2.3 Points Leq(24) Leg(24) Leg C,7 43.3 40.9 -2.4 A,-1 38.9 33.0 -6.0 C,8 42.6 38.8 -3.8 A,0 39.6 32.9 -6.7 C.9 42.2 37.3 _ -4.9 A,1 43.2 33.4 -9.8 C,10 41.6 37.6 -4.0 A,2 45.7 34.2 -11.5 C,11 42.5 37.6 -4.9 A,3 45.6 35.4 -10.2 - C,12 44.3 36.7 - -7.6 B,-1 37.9 32.7 -5.2 D,2 41.7 38.3 -3.4 B,0 39.2 32.8 -6.4 D,3 46.2 39.7 -6.5 8,1 42.6 33.4 -9.2 D,4 48.4 40.5 -7.9 8,2 45.8 I 34.1 -11.7 D,5 48.2 42.1 -6.1 B,3 45.7 35.2 -10.5 D,6 46.2 42.1 -4.1 C,-1 36.7 33.3 -3.4 D,7 44.2 41.7 -2.5 C,0 37.1 33.3 -3.8 D,8 43.7 38.9 -4.8 C,1 39.5 33.6 -5.9 - D,9 43.1 38.3 -4.8 C,2 44.8 34.4 -10.4 0,10 44.9 38.7 -6.2 C,3 46.5 35.2 -11.3 D,11 44.5 38.1 -6.4 D,-1 32.6 33.9 1.3 0,12 45.1 36.8 -8.3 D,0 33.3 33.8 0.5 E,1 42.4 37.4 -5.0 0,1 37.3 34.0 -3.3 E,2 42.2 38.8 -3.4 D,2 43.0 34.4 -8.6 E,3 I 46.7 40.6 -6.2 E,-1 �_ 31.4 33.9 2.5 E,4 I 51.2 41.6 -9.6 E,0 33.1 33.6 0.5 - E,5 51.0 43.4 -7.6 E,1 36.2 33.7 -2.6 E,6 I 44.6 43.4 -1.2 E,2 40.6 34.2 -6.4 E,9 43.1 39.6 -3.5 F,1 I 36.5 33.4 -3.1 E,10 43.1 39.3 -3.8 F,2 i 39.4 34.1 -5.3 _ E,11 1 46.1 38.1 -8.0 - G,1 I 42.5 34.5 -8.0 •a `"A,PiNUAL NOISE REPORT JANUARY 31, 2006 5:30 PM Page 16 3RD QUARTER 2005 -- DEN 65 LDN CONTOUR o n o 0 v4 o a 0 A N `o 'Weld W —, 0_ E a i A /*,'1,:',_. o .. 1 J) Cal.4.t. \-t i/ I Ar° o o Qqo .( , K) 1i P7 aD o o 5 �,�' J A Adams ,,_,),------- /A Adams o r q L�� o w I 1 - >,._, rj Rocky ' Mountain Arsenal — 111 Legend = � V m i ! DEN Property Line •1 } 1 .j n] County Boundary —i 1 V Noise Contours f----: IGA 65 LDN Denver <. _r , -- DEN 3q05 65 LDN Contour .--I Q Adams Nk _ -717 g Arapahoe a o `J' DEN 3q05 65 LDN Contour 0 0.3; 2 3 4Miles . -'.A NOISE REPORT JANUARY 31, 2006 5:30 PM Page 17 a 4 . 3RD QUARTER 2005 - DENVER/ADAMS COUNTY IGA NEPS VALUES Area 2 Area 1 3Q05 3Q05 Grid 1GA Annual Calculated Difference Grid IGA Annual Calculated Difference Points Leg(24) Leq(24) Leq Points Leq(24) Leq(24) Leq A,1 38.6 36.3 -2.3 C,4 44.2 36.7 -7.5 A,2 37.6 37.3 -0.3 C,5 36.7 34.6 -2.1 A,3 42.3 38.3 4.0 C,6 36.0 33.7 -2.3 A,4 45.3 38.9 -6.4 D,4 41.1 36.2 -4.9 A,5 43.9 39.8 -4.1 D,5 34.2 35.0 0.8 A,6 37.5 40.1 2.6 D,6 36.0 34.6 -1.4 A,7 37.7 40.6 2.9 D,7 41.4 35.0 -6.4 A,8 36.5 39.1 2.6 E,4 38.3 35.8 -2.5 A,9 36.3 36.4 0.1 E.5 34.8 35.7 0.9 A,10 37.6 36.1 -1.5 E,6 36.7 34.7 -2.0 A,11 39.2 36.5 -2.7 E,7 41.4 34.5 -6.9 A,12 41.2 36.2 -5.0 F,2 51.7 43.1 -8.6 B,2 39.5 37.6 -1.9 F,3 43.7 38.7 -5.0 B,4 42.5 39.5 -3.0 F,5 37.3 34.4 -2.9 B,5 43.1 40.5 -2.6 F,6 38.5 34.2 -4.3 B,6 39.0 41.0 2.0 F,7 42.1 34.5 -7.6 8,7 39.0 41.4 2.4 G,2 51.2 43.9 -7.3 B,8 38.0 39.1 1.1 G,3 42.1 38.8 -3.3 B,9 38.3 36.9 -1.4 G,4 40.2 35.4 -4.8 8,10 39.0 37.3 -1.7 H,2 50.1 44.7 -5.4 8,11 40.4 37.7 -2.7 H,3 46.0 39.2 -6.8 B,12 42.6 37.1 -5.5 H,4 46.1 36.1 -10.0 C,2 41.0 38.2 -2.8 C,3 43.3 39.6 -3.7 Area 3 C,4 43.5 40.3 -3.3 3Q05 C,5 43.4 41.4 -2.0 Grid IGA Annual Calculated Difference C,6 43.3 42.1 -1.2 Points Leq(24) Leq(24) Leq C,7 43.3 42.3 -1.1 A,-1 38.9 32.5 -6.5 C,8 42.6 39.2 -3.4 A,0 39.6 32.9 -6.7 C,9 42.2 37.7 -4.5 A,1 43.2 33.5 -9.7 C,10 41.6 38.6 -3.0 A,2 45.7 34.4 -11.3 C,11 42.5 38.7 .3.8 A,3 45.6 35.4 -10.2 C,12 44.3 37.6 -6.8 B,-1 37.9 32.4 -5.5 D,2 41.7 38.8 -2.9 8,0 39.2 32.9 -6.3 0,3 46.2 40.3 -5.9 8,1 42.6 33.6 -9.1 0,4 48.4 41.2 -7.2 B,2 45.8 34.2 -11.6 D,5 48.2 42.5 -5.7 B,3 45.7 35.2 -10.8 D,6 46.2 43.4 -2.8 C,-1 36.7 _ 33.3 -3.4 D,7 44.2 43.0 -1.2 C,0 37.1 33.5 -3.6 D,8 43.7 39.3 -4.4 C,1 39.5 33.9 -5.6 D,9 43.1 39.0 -4.1 C,2 44.8 34.7 -10.1 D,10 44.9 39.8 -5.1 C,3 46.5 36.1 -10.4 D,11 44.5 39.0 -5.5 D,-1 32.6 34.2 1.6 D,12 45.1 37.5 -7.6 D,0 33.3 34.2 0.9 E,1 42.4 37.9 -4.5 D,1 37.3 34.4 -2.9 E,2 42.2 39.4 -2.8 D,2 43.0 35.0 -8.0 E,3 46.7 41.1 -5.6 E,-1 31.4 34.1 2.7 E,4 51.2 42.4 -8.8 E,0 33.1 33.9 0.8 E,5 51.0 43.7 -7.3 E,1 36.2 33.9 -2.3 E,6 44.6 45.0 0.4 E,2 40.6 34.5 -6.1 E,9 43.1 40.6 -2.5 F,1 36.5 33.6 -2.9 E,10 43.1 40.3 -2.8 F,2 39.4 34.5 -4.9 E,11 46.I 38.8 -7.3 G,1 42.5 34.4 -8.1 w r- '-'/Ili-ANNUAL 5 ANNUAL NOISE REPORT JANUARY 31, 2006 5:30 PM Page 18 . •ast..�3,41.: . 4TH QUARTER 2005 - DEN 65 LDN CONTOUR N Weld W' E S `L 1 �� 4_ / C`'- NN , i c. K. —4 1 �� , �0 .s. / Adams Z .,•, : A / 1 1 • 1, , 1 Adams j i i (.\I _ Rocky Mountain t-- -- UIJ�' i Arsenal I 1 I — Legend DEN Property Ltne i i 1.-----, 1 ✓ __ County Boundary i Noise Contours Denver 77 1GA 65 LDN Contour j -- DEN 4q05 65 LON Contour 1 Adams U — cu. ` r Arapahoe .. 17(' . Mlles .. DEN 4Q05 65 LDN Contour o 0.51 2 3 4 ,,13-ANNUAL NOISE REPORT JANUARY 31, 2006 5:30 PM Page 19 4TH QUARTER 2005 - DENVER/ADAMS COUNTY IGA NEPS VALUES Area 2 Area 1 4O05 4Q05 Grid IGA Annual Calculated Difference Grid IGA Annual Calculated Difference Points Leq(24) Leg(24) Leq Points Leq(24) Leq(24) Leg A,1 38.6 35.7 -3.0 C,4 44.2 35.3 -8.9 A,2 37.6 36.2 -1.4 C,5 36.7 33.6 -3.1 .,A,3 42.3 37.0 -5.3 C,6 36.0 32.8 -3.2 A,4 45.3 37.7 -7.6 D,4 41.1 35.1 -6.0 A,5 43.9 38.3 -5.6 D,5 34.2 34.5 0.3 A,6 37.5 38.6 1.1 D,6 36.0 34.2 -1.8 A,7 37.7 39.1 1.4 D,7 41.4 35.0 -6.5 A,8 I 36.5 37.9 1.4 E.4 38.3 35.1 -3.2 A,9 ! 36.3 35.6 -0.7 E,5 34.8 35.5 0.7 A,10 37.6 34.6 -3.0 E,6 36.7 34.8 -1.9 ~ A,11 39.2 34.4 -4.8 E,7 41.4 - 35.1 -6.3 A,12 41.2 33.9 -7.3 F,2 51.7 39.2 -12.5 B,2 39.5 36.7 -2.8 F,3 43.7 36.0 -7.7 B,4 42.5 38.3 -4.2 F,5 37.3 34.2 -3.1 B,5 43.1 39.1 -4.1 F,6 38.5 34.3 -4.2 B,6 39.0 39.4 0.4 F,7 42.1 34.6 -7.5 6,7 39.0 39.8 0.8 G,2 51.2 39.8 -11.4 6,8 38.0 38.1 0.1 G,3 42.1 - 35.6 -6.5 6,9 38.3 36.0 i -2.3 G,4� 40.2 �� 33.8 -6.4 6,10 39.0 35.7 I -3.3 H,2 50.1 40.9 -9.2 B,11 40.4 35.7 -4.7 H,3 46.0 35.9 -10.1 B,12 42.6 I 35.2 -7.4 H,4 46.1 34.1 -12.0 C,2 1 41.0 j 37.6 -3.4 C,3 43.3 38.2 -5.1 Area 3 C,4 43.5 38.9 -4.6 4Q05 C,5 I 43.4 39.9 -3.5 Grid IGA Annual Calculated Difference C,6 I 43.3 40.2 -3.1 Points Leg(24) Leg(24) Leg C,7 43.3 40.6 -2.7 A,-1 38.9 31.8 -7.1 C,8 42.6 38.4 -4.2 A.0 39.6 32.1 -7.5 C,9 42.2 36.8 -5.5 A,1 43.2 32.7 -10.5 C,10 41.6 37.1 -4.5 A,2 45.7 _ 33.7 -12.0 C,11 42.5 ' 36.9 -5.6 , A,3 45.6 34.9 -10.8 C,12 44.3 35.8 -8.5 B,-1 37.9 - 31.4 -6.5 D,2 41.7 37.8 -3.9 6,0 39.2 31.7 -7.5 D,3 _ 46.2 38.9 -7.3 B,1 42.6 32.1 -10.5 D,4 48.4 39.5 -8.9 B.2 45.8 - 33.0 -12.8 D,5 48.2 40.7 -7.5 6,3 45.7 - 34.3 -11.4 D,6 46.2 41.3 -4.9 C,-1 36.7 31.8 -4.9 D,7 44.2 i 41.4 -2.8 C,0 37.1 31.9 -5.2 D,8 43.7 38.5 -5.2 C,1 39.5 32.2 -7.3 D,9 43.1 37.9 -5.2 C,2 44.8 33.1 -11.7 D,10 44.9 38.3 -6.6 C,3 46.5 33.9 -12.6 D,11 44.5 37.2 -7.3 D,-1 32.6 32.6 0.0 D,12 45.1 35.6 -9.5 D,0 33.3 - 32.6 -0.8 E,1 42.4 36.7 -5.7 0,1 37.3 32.6 -4.7 E,2 42.-2-------:-37.9 - -4.3 D,2 43.0 33.0 -10.0 E,3 46.7 39.6 -7.1 E,-1 31.4 - 32.7 1.3 E,4 51.2 40.5 -10.7 E,0 33.1 - 32.3 -0.8 - E,5 51.0 41.7 -9.3 E,1 36.2 32.2 -4.0 E,6 44.6 42.6 i -2.1 E,2 40.6 32.7 -7.9 E,9 43.1 _ 39.3 -3.8 F,1 36.5 32.1 -4.4 E,10 43.1 38.8 -4.4 F,2 39.4 - 33.1 -6.3 E,11 46.1 - 36.9 -9.2 G,1 42.5 33.3 -9.2 DEN IS TEN ! February 27,1995. It was called Push Night. Denver International Airport celebrated it's A winter storm threatened. At Denver's worn and 10th year of operation on February 28,2005. Licsi>osilr venerable Stapleton de and ,the airlines g haskeleton cut er 5 the first flight n se arrived on a snowy throughng flight schedules and were keeping skeleton over 350 million passengers have flown through crews. In the evening dusk,lines of tugs hauled DEN. Denver International Airport currently ranks equipment northward in the largest logistical as the fifth-busiest airport in North America and movement of the time outside of a full-scale the 10th-busiest in the world. VISION military mobilization. The last flight out of Stapleton left at 9:00 Working together,we will be the g p Source:Sunday.February 27th,2005 Special Feature to the p.m.that evening,a Continental DC-10 bound Denver Post and the Rooky Mountain New world's finest airport. News non-stop for London's Gatwick Airport. The fol- lowing morning at 6:00 a.m.a United Airlines F eseno NIe Boeing 737 from Colorado Springs landed at the MISSION first major built-from-the-ground-up airport in the 6�l United States since the 1970s—Denver Interna- 10th c9rvtiuensat , Enhancing economic prosperity and lmn zoos tional Airport - (DEN)..) quality of life in the Denver region by Shortly thereafter,in a driving snowstorm that connecting its people and products to would have nearly halted operations at the now- the world. closed Stapleton Airport,three aircraft landed simultaneously in near-zero visibility on DEN's three parallel Category Illb ILS(Instrument Land- Leading the aviation industry in safety, ing System)runways,a feat that had never be- service,convenience,efficienc y, been accomplished at any airport in the tive practices,aesthetics and financial world. strength. Please visit wwwilvdenver.com ter other DEN Noise Office Reports and information. DENVER INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT eat ue. Boulevard r, NW Corner • 80249 � c ,f e:` „gs rc« 2200 xJ - 1.800.417.2988 'Y� Hello