Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20062404 INVENTORY OF ITEMS FOR CONSIDERATION Applicant St. Vrain Lakes PUD Case Number 2006-004 Metropolitan District Submitted or Prepared Prior to At Hearing Hearing 1 Staff Comments X Department of Planning Services Field Check Form n/a / - Letter to Applicant X Affidavit of sign posting n/a Legal Notifications X 2 Application X Maps X Deed/Easement Certificate n/a Surrounding Property/Mineral Owners n/a Utilities n/a 3 Referral List X Town of Erie, referral received July 14,2006 X City of Dacono, referral received July 25, 2006 X Mt.View Fire Protection District, referral received July 28, 2006 X Weld County Department of Public Health & Environment, referral received July X 21,2006 4 Referrals with comments X i.� Weld County Department of Finance, referral received July 23, 2006 X City of Longmont, referral received August 2, 2006 X St.Vrain Sanitation District, referral received July 19,2006 X Longs Peak Water District, referral received July 19,2006 X / Weld County Department of Public Works, email dated July 24, 2006 & a X memorandum dated July 25, 2006 Bernard, Lyons,Gaddis&Kahn, referral received July 21,2006 X 5 PC Exhibits X L•- 5.a Copy of applicants presentation X 1 -Planning-Gemmissian-Resafufion--,c1y /�/crn i�„'elf '//o" i-ca r: vi °, X EXHIBIT I hereby certify that the eighteen items identified herein were submitted to the Department of Planning Services a scheduled Bo unty Commissi Jacqueli Hat h . PI 'liner 2006-2404 a DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES 4209 CR 24.5 LONGMONT, COLORADO 80504 WEBSITE: www.co.weld.co.us PHONE (720) 652-4210, EXT. 8730 FAX (720) 6524211 COLORADO August 5, 2006 St. Vrain Lakes PUD do Kristen D. Bear White, Bear&Ankele PC 1805 Shea Centre Drive Suite 100 Highlands Ranch, CO 80129 Subject: Service Plan Application for Proposed St. Vrain Lakes PUD Metropolitan District 1, District 2, District 3, and District 4. Legal: Located on parts of Sections 25, 35 and 36, T3N, R68W of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado. Dear Ms. Bear: The Department of Planning Services has reviewed your request for Weld County approval of the four Special District Service Plans referenced above. These requests are scheduled before the Weld County Planning Commission on August 15, 2006, at 1:30 p.m. The hearing will take place at the Southwest Weld County Service Center at 4209 CR 24.5, located in the northeast corner of 1-25 and Highway 119. Please consider these comments as an unified response to the Special District Provisions. POSSIBLE ISSUES SUMMARIZED FROM APPLICATION MATERIALS The criteria for review of this Metropolitan District are listed in Section 32-1-203(2) and Section 32-1-203(2.5), C.R.S. and Section 2-14-20 through Section 2-14-70 of the Weld County Code. The Department of Planning Services' staff has received responses from the following agencies: • Weld County Department of Public Health & Environment, referral received July 21, 2006 • Weld County Department of Finance, referral received July 23, 2006 • City of Longmont, referral received August 2, 2006 • Town of Erie, referral received July 14, 2006 • Mt. View Fire Protection District, referral received July 28, 2006 • City of Dacono, referral received July 25, 2006 • St. Vrain Sanitation District, referral received July 19, 2006 • Longs Peak Water District, referral received July 19, 2006 • Weld County Department of Public Works, email dated July 24, 2006 & a memorandum dated July 25, 2006 • Bernard, Lyons, Gaddis & Kahn, referral received July 21, 2006 St. Vrain Lakes Metropolitan Districts Page 1 The Department of Planning Services' staff has not received responses from the following agencies: • Weld County Attorney's Office • Oil and Gas Conservation Commission • Town of Berthoud • Town of Firestone • Town of Frederick • Town of Mead • Little Thompson Water District The Department of Planning Services in conjunction with the Weld County Attorney's Office and Weld County Finance Department recommend that the Planning Commission approve the attached Service Plan for St. Vrain Lakes PUD Metropolitan District for the following reason: It is the opinion of the Department of Planning Services' staff that the applicant has shown compliance with Section 32-1-203(2) and Section 32-1-203(2.5), C.R.S. as follows: 1. Section 32-1-203(2) states the Board of County Commissioners shall approve the Service Plan unless evidence satisfactory to the Board of each of the following is presented: a) There is sufficient existing and projected need for organized service in the area to be serviced by the proposed special district. The submitted Service District #1 and supporting Financing Districts #2-4 are proposed to provide urban services within an area of Weld County that is zoned PUD with (E) Estate; (R-1) Low Density Residential; (R-2) Duplex Residential; (R-3) Medium Density Residential; (R-4) High Density Residential; (C-1) Neighborhood Commercial, (C-2) General Commercial and continuing Oil and Gas Production Uses in the Mixed Use Development Overlay District. The subdivision is identified as the St. Vrain Lakes PUD and comprises of approximately 1313 acres with 4800 to 5131 residential lots with an average lot size of 7500-8000 SF. There are also three commercial development areas (40 acres) and a municipal development area (22 acres), three school sites and 334 acres of open space. The PUD is located within the Mixed Use Development (MUD) area, and within the three mile Municipal referral area with the Towns of Mead, Firestone, and Frederick. The Board of County Commissioners approved the Change of Zone application (PZ-1078) on March 15, 2006. The applicant has indicated in their application that the financing plan and the content of the service plan describe the overall development plans for the project. The project will require substantial public improvements, in excess of $99,000,000. in order to facilitate build-out. Implementation of an organized and coordinated financing and phased construction program through the proposed districts is crucial for a development of this size and scope. Accordingly, the demand for the services and facilities to be provided by the districts is demonstrable. St. Vrain Lakes Metropolitan Districts Page 2 b) The existing service in the area to be sewed by the proposed special district is inadequate for present and projected needs. The applicant has indicated in their application that there are currently no other entities in existence in the project area which have the ability and/or desire to undertake the design, financing and construction of improvements needed for the community. It is also the developer's understanding that the County does not consider it feasible or practicable for the County to provide the necessary services and facilities for the project. Consequently, use of the new districts is deemed necessary for the provision of public improvements in the project. Therefore, provision of facilities will not be available through other institutions. The letter from Bernard, Lyons, Gaddis and Kahn representing the St. Vrain Sanitation District dated July 21, 2006 states, "most if not all of the proposed districts boundaries would fall within this districts boundaries and pursuant to Sec. 32-1-107, C.R.S., a metro district possessing the same sanitation district powers as the St. Vrain Sanitation District cannot be formed within the boundaries of St. Vrain without a resolution of approval by this District's board of Directors. This district is willing to grant such a resolution of consent provided that the new metro district agrees to either an amendment of the submitted service plan of the execution of an IGA that expressly limits the exercise of their statutory powers so as to not conflict with this districts exercise of its powers, service plan and service area." The St. Vrain Sanitation District has outlined nine items to be addressed regarding the service plan. Little Thompson Water District has not responded to the referral request at this time. c) The proposed special district is capable of providing economical and sufficient service to the area within its proposed boundaries. The referral dated July 23, 2006 addresses the concerns of Don Warden, Director of Finance. Mr. Warden states, "St. Vrain Lakes Metropolitan Districts 1, 2, 3, and 4 prepared by Stan Bernstein and Associates, Inc., and reviewed by D.A. Davidson & Company appears to be financially feasible and prepared in accordance with the Weld County Code Section 2-14-300). The maximum mill levy of 65 mills with 50 mills maximum for debt service and up to 15 mills for operations and maintenance is consistent and in compliance with Weld County Code Section 2-14-20 (H). The maximum debt mill levy imposition term is consistent and in compliance with Weld County Code Section 2-14-30." The applicant has indicated in their application that the proposed districts are necessary in order to provide at the most economical and efficient means of undertaking the district activities to serve existing and future residents within their respective boundaries. The financing plan demonstrates the feasibility of providing the districts activities proposed here in on an economical basis. The formation of the district will facilitate the financing of the proposed public St. Vrain Lakes Metropolitan Districts Page 3 improvements in the most cost effective manner as the districts will have access to tax-except financing not otherwise available to private entities. d) The area to be included in the proposed special district has, or will have, the financial ability to discharge the proposed indebtedness on a reasonable basis. The referral dated July 23, 2006 addresses the concerns of Don Warden, Director of Finance. Mr. Warden States, "St. Vrain Lakes Metropolitan Districts 1, 2, 3, and 4 prepared by Stan Bernstein and Associates, Inc., and reviewed by D.A. Davidson & Company appears to be financially feasible and prepared in accordance with the Weld County Code Section 2-14-300). The maximum mill levy of 65 mills with 50 mills maximum for debt service and up to 15 mills for operations and maintenance is consistent and in compliance with Weld County Code Section 2-14-20 (H). The maximum debt mill levy imposition term is consistent and in compliance with Weld County Code Section 2-14-30." In conclusion, in review of the financial aspects of the service plan for St. Vrain Lakes PUD Metropolitan District I find the plan to be consistent and in compliance with all sections of the Weld County Code Article XIV relating to financing of metropolitan districts. In addition, the Financial Plan for the St. Vrain Lakes Metropolitan District prepared by George K. Baum & Company appears to be financially feasible. Therefore, I recommend approval of the service plan." The applicant has indicated in their application that the matters described in the Consolidated Service Plan for St. Vrain Lakes Metropolitan District #1-4 establish that the creation of the district is in the best interest of the area to be served, in that they establish a demand for public improvements that otherwise will be unmet by other governmental entities. The districts also offer the advantage of obtaining public financing to fund these improvements. In addition, the use of a multiple district structure is beneficial, as it permits: (a) the phasing of improvements to occur according to logical development modules, resulting in a more specific association of cost with benefit and less incentive to initiate pubic improvements programs too far in advance of development; (b) the ability to arrange for delivery of public infrastructure in a manner that will conform to the approved development plans that will be associated with the project in the future, thus permitting development of the project in accordance with County expectations; and (c) maintenance of a reasonably uniform mill levy and fee structure through coordinated planning and financing for construction of public improvements. 2. Section 32-1-203(2.5) states "the Board of County Commissioners may disapprove the service plan if evidence satisfactory to the Board of any of the following, at the discretion of the Board, is not permitted": a) Adequate service is not, or will not be, available to the area through the county or other existing municipal or quasi-municipal corporations, including existing special districts, within a reasonable time and on a comparable basis. The applicant has indicated in their application that there are no other governmental agencies in existence within the area which have the legal and St. Vrain Lakes Metropolitan Districts Page 4 financial ability to undertake the financing, design, and completion of the public improvements needed to serve the St. Vrain Lakes PUD Development. The letter from Bernard, Lyons, Gaddis and Kahn representing the St. Vrain Sanitation District dated July 21, 2006 states, "most if not all of the proposed districts boundaries would fall within this districts boundaries and pursuant to Sec. 32-1-107, C.R.S., a metro district possessing the same sanitation district powers as the St. Vrain Sanitation District can not be formed within the boundaries of St. Vrain without a resolution of approval by this District's board of Directors. This district is willing to grant such a resolution of consent provided that the new metro district agrees to either an amendment of the submitted service plan of the execution of an IGA that expressly limits the exercise of their statutory powers so as to not conflict with this districts exercise of its powers, service plan and service area." The St. Vrain Sanitation District has outlined nine items to be addressed regarding the service plan. Little Thompson Water District has not responded to the referral request at this time. b) The facility and service standards of the proposed special district are compatible with the facility and service standards of each county within which the proposed special district is to be located and each municipality which is an interested party under Section 32-1-204(1). The applicant has indicated in their application that the service plan and all applicable rules and regulations of the County and other jurisdictions require that all facility and service standards associated with the public improvements must be met. Consequently, all facility and service standards will be compatible with all governing jurisdictions. c) The proposal is in substantial compliance with a master plan adopted pursuant to Section 30-28-106, C.R.S. The proposed Services Plans are in conformance with the adopted Weld County Comprehensive (Master) Plan. The applicant has indicated in their application that the service plan clearly states that all pubic improvements must be in accordance applicable ordinances, codes and regulations of the County, inclusive of the applicable master plan and any water quality management plan. The service plans future makes it clear that the County has exclusive jurisdiction over all property development issues within the boundaries of the districts. d) The proposal is in compliance with any duly adopted county, regional, or state long-range water quality management plan for the area. The Department of Planning Services has not received a referral from the Little Thompson Water District at this time and is unable to evaluate water quality St. Vrain Lakes Metropolitan Districts Page 5 standards, although the proposed District presumably would comply with state and other jurisdictional requirements. e) The creation of the proposed special district will be in the best interests of the area proposed to be served. The applicant has indicated in their application that the matters in the service plan establish that the creation of the districts is in the best interests of the area to be served, in that they establish a significant demand for public improvements that will not otherwise be provided by existing governmental entities. The districts offer the advantage of obtaining pubic financing to fund these improvements. In addition, the use of a multiple district structure is beneficial , as it permits: (a) the phasing of improvements to occur according to logical development modules, resulting in a more specific association of cost with benefit and less incentive to initiate pubic improvements programs too far in advance of development; (b) the ability to arrange for delivery of public infrastructure in a manner that will conform to the approved development plans that will be associated with the project in the future, thus permitting development of the project in accordance with County expectations; and (c) maintenance of a reasonably uniform mill levy and fee structure through coordinated planning and financing for construction of public improvements. 3. Section 2-14-10 states "The County establishes the following as its policy for the review and approval or disapproval of Service Plans, including any amendment thereof, for Metropolitan District and other Title 32 Special Districts." a) Section 2-14-10.8 The County generally accepts the formation of districts where it is demonstrated the formation of a district is needed to provide public services or facilities to local development and will result in benefits to existing or future residents of the County and the District. Section 2-14-10.8 The submitted Service District and supporting Financing Districts are proposed to provide urban services within an area of Weld County that is zoned PUD with (E) Estate; (R-1) Low Density Residential; (R-2) Duplex Residential; (R-3) Medium Density Residential; (R-4) High Density Residential; (C-1) Neighborhood Commercial, (C-2) General Commercial and continuing Oil and Gas Production Uses in the Mixed Use Development Overlay District. Identified as the St. Vrain Lakes PUD and comprising of approximately 1313 acres with 4800 to 5131 residential lots with an average lot size of 7500-8000 SF. There are also three commercial development areas (40 acres) and a municipal development area (22 acres), three school sites and 334 acres of open space. The PUD is located within the Mixed Use Development (MUD) area, and within the three mile Municipal referral area with the Towns of Mead, Firestone, and Frederick. The Board of County Commissioner approved the Change of Zone application (PZ- 1078) on March 15, 2006. St. Vrain Lakes Metropolitan Districts Page 6 b) Section 2-14-20.C The Service Plan shall enumerate and describe all powers requested on behalf of the district. Demonstration of the need or benefit of each power is required. Powers which are not clearly needed will not be approved in the service plan. As previously discussed, the need for urban-level services has been adequately demonstrated. The applicant has indicated in their application that the districts expect and are authorized to own, operate and maintain certain public improvements not dedicated to the County or other governmental entitles, the scope of which shall include, but not necessarily be limited to park and recreation improvements, lake and water amenities within the project and associated recreation facilities and buildings. Certain other public improvements will be dedicated to either County, or in the case of water a sanitation improvements to the Little Thompson Water District and the St. Vrain Sanitation District, respectively, according to the requisite procedures for eth specific entity. Determination of both the scope and manner in which specific public improvements will be dedicated to the County and/or other governmental entities will be the subject of separate agreements among the interested parties. c) Section 2-14-20.D Any Intergovernmental Agreement which is required, or known at the time of formation of the District to likely be required to fulfill the purposes of the District, must be described in the Service Plan, along with supporting rationale. The Service Plan shall provide that execution of intergovernmental agreements by the District that are not described in the Service Plan shall require 45 day notice publication and written notice to the County pursuant to Section 32- 1-207(3)(6), C.R.S. The proposed Service Plans explain that water and sanitation services will be provided via an Agreement with the St. Vrain Sanitation District and the Little Thompson Water District. d) Section 2-14-20. E The Service Plan shall include the description of any planned inclusion into, or exclusion of property from, the District's boundaries. The Service Plan shall provide that inclusions or executions by the District that are not described in the Service Plan shall require 45 day notice publication and written notice to the County pursuant to Section 32-1-207(3)(6), C.R.S. The proposed Plans do provide for County notification and/or consideration of any expansion or contraction of the District, regardless of the size of the potential area. Any proposed inclusion or exclusion of property shall require forty-five day published and written notice to the County made pursuant to Section 23-1- 207(3)(b) C.R.S. e) Section 2-14-20.F The Service Plan shall describe any planned extraterritorial service agreement. The Service Plan shall provide that any extraterritorial service agreements by the District that are not described in the Service Plan shall require 45 day notice publication and written notice to the County pursuant to Section 32-1-207(3)(b), C.R.S. St. Vrain Lakes Metropolitan Districts Page 7 The Plans as proposed do exclude the possibility of extraterritorial service agreements. With the specific exemption of facilities to be constructed outside the boundaries of the districts and which are necessary for the development of the project and are set forth as part of the primary infrastructure plan, the district may only provide services to properties outside the districts service area pursuant to extraterritorial service agreements with the written consent of the County's Board of County Commissioners. Any extraterritorial service agreements entered into by the district that are not described in the service plan shall require forty-five day notice publication and written notice to the County pursuant to Section 31-1-207(3)(b) C.R.S. f) Section 2-14-20.G The Service Plan shall outline any anticipated plans or needs for the exercise, by the District, of its power of eminent domain. The Service Plan will contain language limiting the use of the District's power of eminent domain to carry out the District's essential functions and services as well to implement the intent of the "Primary Infrastructure Plan" as defined in the Model Service Plan described in Section 2-14-60. The use of eminent domain will be undertaken strictly in compliance with State laws. The Service Plan shall provide that use of eminent domain or change in the Primary Infrastructure Plan by the District not described in the Service Plan shall require 45 day notice publication and written notice to the County pursuant to Section 32-1-207(3)(b), C.R.S. The proposed Plans do limit the Districts' eminent domain powers. The districts shall have the power to exercise the power of eminent domain, but only in connection with carrying out the districts essential purposes and functions and the districts primary infrastructure plan, provided further, that the use of eminent domain shall be undertake in strict compliance with State and Federal law. The use of eminent domain or a material change in the primary infrastructure plan by the districts not otherwise contemplated herein or required by an approved development plan shall require forth-five day published and written notice to the County pursuant to Section 32-1-207(3)(b)C.R.S. g) Section 2-14-20.H The Service Plan shall restrict the District's debt service mill levy authorization to 50 mills (the "Debt Service Mill Levy Cap'). The Service Plan shall restrict the District's total aggregate mill levy (debt service mill levy plus operations and maintenance mill levy) to sixty-five (65) mill (the `Aggregate Mill Levy Cap'). The maximum mill levy of 65 mills with 50 mills maximum for debt service and up to 15 mills for operations and maintenance is consistent and in compliance with Weld County Code Section 2-14-20 (H). The maximum debt mill levy imposition term is consistent and in compliance with Weld County Code Section 2-14-30. h) Section 2-14-20.J The Service Plan shall require that 30 days prior to an election thereon, proposed ballot questions for a formation election, debt authorization, or de-Brucing will be submitted to Weld County for filing and review. Weld County shall have the right to object to any ballot questions not in compliance with the Service Plan as a major modification of the District's Service Plan pursuant to Section 32-1-207(3)(a), C.R.S. St. Vrain Lakes Metropolitan Districts Page 8 The proposed Plans do provide for any notification and consideration by the County for proposed ballot questions for formation elections, debt authorization, or "de-Brucing" clauses. No later than thirty days prior to an election thereon, proposed ballot questions for a formation election, dept authorization or de- Brucing will be submitted to the County for filing and review. i) Section 2-14-40.A It is the intent of Weld County that "citizen/resident"control of Districts be encouraged to occur as early as possible. The applicant has indicated in their application that the districts are proposed to exist pursuant to a multiple district structure as the projected absorption of the project and public improvements to be financed is projected to extend well over a ten year period from the date anticipated for organization of the districts. Additionally, the project includes multiple uses including various types of residential products and commercial development. The boundaries of the three financing districts are based upon two separate phases of residential development and a separate parcel that shall include commercial development. District number 1 is proposed to be the service district and is expected to coordinate the manner in which the district activities shall be conducted with and between each of the financing district pursuant to one for more district IGA's. j) Section 2-14-50 The Service Plan shall provide for the dissolution of the District after the District's debts and financial obligations are fully defeased and the District has completed all of its operations and maintenance responsibilities. A district with long-term, on-going operations and maintenance will not be obligated to dissolve. However, the Service Plan must provide that in the event said obligations are someday undertaken by another party, or are otherwise no longer the responsibility of the District, it shall be required to dissolve. The applicant has indicated in their application that after all bonds or their debt instruments have been issued by the districts and adequate provision has been made for payment of all debt of the service district and financing districts, the electorate of the districts will have the opportunity to consider either the consolidation of the service district and financing district into a single entity, of the dissolution of the service district and/or financing districts in accordance the state law. Prior to the Board of County Commissioners hearing: (a) The applicant shall amend the Metropolitan District to include the concerns of the Weld County Department of Public Works as stated in their email dated July 24, 2006 & memorandum dated July 25, 2006. Evidence of approval shall be submitted to the Department of Planning Services. St. Vrain Lakes Metropolitan Districts Page 9 Prior to Proceeding to District Court: (a) The applicant shall address the requirements/concerns of the St. Vrain Sanitation District as stated in their referrals dated July 19, 2006. Evidence of approval shall be submitted to the Department of Planning Services. (b) The applicant shall address the requirements/concerns of the letter from Bernard Lyons Gaddis and Kahn representing the St. Vrain Sanitation District as stated in their referrals dated July 21, 2006. Evidence of approval shall be submitted to the Department of Planning Services. (c) The applicant shall address the requirements/concerns of the Longs Peak Water District as stated in their referral dated July 19, 2006. Evidence of approval shall be submitted to the Department of Planning Services. (d) The applicant shall address the requirements/concerns of the City of Longmont as stated in their referral dated August 2, 2006. Evidence of approval shall be submitted to the Department of Planning Services. As discussed, the Special District request is scheduled to be heard by the Planning Commission on August 15, 2006, at 1:30 p.m. The hearing will take place at the Southwest Weld County Service Center at 4209 CR 24.5, located in the northeast corner of 1-25 and Highway 119. This letter and recommendation will be forwarded to the Weld County Planning Commission as the basis of their deliberation. If you have any questions about this staff analysis or County comments, please do not hesitate to call me at 720-652-4210, ext. 8730. Regards, Jacqueline Hatch, Planner II cc: Bruce Barker, County Attorney Monica Daniels-Mika, Director of Planning Services Don Warden, Director of Finance and Administration St. Vrain Lakes Metropolitan Districts Page 10 RESOLUTION RE: ACCEPTANCE OF FILING OF SERVICE PLAN, REFERRAL TO WELD COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FOR STUDY AND RECOMMENDATION,AND SET HEARING DATE FOR CONSIDERATION - ST. VRAIN METROPOLITAN DISTRICT NOS. 1, 2, 3, AND 4 WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, pursuant to Colorado statute and the Weld County Home Rule Charter, is vested with the authority of administering the affairs of Weld County, Colorado, and WHEREAS,the Service Plan for the St. Vrain Metropolitan District Nos. 1, 2, 3, and 4, has been received by the Clerk to the Board from the proposed Metropolitan District's attorneys,White Bear and Ankele, 1805 Shea Center Drive, Suite 100, Highlands Ranch, Colorado 80129, for filing with, and consideration by, the Board of County Commissioners, and WHEREAS,Section 32-1-204(2), C.R.S., requires that the Service Plan be delivered to the Weld County Planning Commission for study and recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners, such recommendation to be received by the Board within thirty(30)days after the filing of the Service Plan, and WHEREAS,the Board deems that the date of filing should be commensurate with the date of this Resolution, in order to allow enough time for referrals of the Service Plans to appropriate agencies for comment prior to the public hearing before the Planning Commission, and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners deems it advisable to accept the filing of the Service Plan as of July 10, 2006, and to refer it to the Weld County Planning Commission for study and recommendation back to the Board of County Commissioners, such recommendation to be received by the Board prior to August 23, 2006, pursuant to the proposed schedule recommended by the applicant, which schedule waives the thirty-day requirement, and WHEREAS,the Board of County Commissioners deems it advisable to set a public hearing date for its consideration of said Service Plan, said hearing date to be August 30, 2006, at 9:00 a.m., and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, that the filing of said Service Plan be, and hereby is, accepted. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that said Service Plan be, and hereby is, referred to the Weld County Planning Commission for study and recommendation back to the Board of County Commissioners, such recommendation to be received by the Board prior to August 23, 2006. 2006-1856 SD0130 RE: SERVICE PLAN - ST. VRAIN METROPOLITAN DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, AND 4 PAGE 2 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, that the public hearing for consideration of the St. Vrain Metropolitan District Nos. 1, 2, 3, and 4, be, and hereby is, August 30, 2006, at 9:00 a.m. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners that the organizers of the proposed Metropolitan District have paid the filing fee of $500.00, by Check #549, as required by Appendix 5-D of the Weld County Code, to the Clerk to the Board. The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the 10th day of July, A.D., 2006. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY, COLORADO ATTEST: M. J. Geile, Chair Weld County Clerk to the Board David E. Long, Pro-Tem BY: Deputy Clerk to the Board William H. Jerke APPROVED AS TO FORM: Robert D. Masden County Attorney Glenn Vaad Date of signature: 2006-1856 SD0130 a. DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES NORTH OFFICE- AA* JIT/H- 918 10TH Street GREELEY, CO 80631631 PHONE: (970) 353-6100, Ext. 3540 IFAX: (970)304-6498 Ce SOUTHWEST OFFICE 4209 CR 24.5 COLORADO LONGMONT, CO 80504 PHONE: (720)652-4210, Ext. 8730 FAX: (720)652-4211 July 10, 2006 St Vrain Lakes PUD Kristen D. Bear do White, Bear&Ankele PC 1805 Shea Cntr Dr Ste 100 Highlands Ranch CO 80129 Subject: 2006-XX - a Service Plan for Metropolitan Districts 1, 2, 3, and 4 (St Vrain Lakes PUD), located on parts of Sections 25, 35, and 36, T3N, R68W of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado.. Dear Applicants: Your application and related materials for the request described above are being processed. I have scheduled a meeting with the Weld County Planning Commission for August 15, 2006, at 1:30 p.m. This meeting will take place in the Hearing Room, Weld County Planning Department,4209 CR 24.5, Longmont,Colorado. It is recommended that you and/or a representative in attendance to answer any questions the Planning Commission members may have. is the applicant's responsibility to comply with state statutes regarding notice to mineral estate owners. Colorado Revised Statute, C.R.S.24-65.5-103 (adopted as part of H.B.01-1088) requires notification of all mineral estate owners 30 days prior to any public hearing. The applicant shall provide the Weld County Planning Department with written certification indicating the above requirements have been met. The Department of Planning Services' staff will make a recommendation concerning this application to the Weld County Planning Commission. This recommendation will be available twenty-four(24)hours before the scheduled hearing. It is the responsibility of the applicant to call the Department of Planning Services'office before the Planning Commission hearing to make arrangements to obtain the recommendation. If you have any questions concerning this matter, please call. Respectfully, Kim le Planner Kim Ogle ..Subject: Service Plan Hearing - St. Vrain tro Districts 1, 2, 3, and 4 (Kim Ogle) Start: Wed 08/30/2006 9:00 AM End: Wed 08/30/2006 10:00 AM Show Time As: Tentative Recurrence: (none) Meeting Status: Not yet responded Required Attendees: Esther Gesick; CTB; Kim Ogle Accepted Service Plan and referred to PC 7/10 Send Notice 8/4 Publication 8/9 PC Hearing 8/15 PC recommendation 8/23 BOCC hearing 8/30 • 1 Ala 1� PR p Is- 1. 1lI ��,',4.(,�,, It. :144‘... -.;... . :6:4,44\ ' d d 'd }t s._ 7h•• ^ and • i :w� r• . y ; S-�a''y _ � 01 / 14 / 2006 01 / 14/ 2006 a y:. 01 / 14/ 2006 - _ T 01 / 14 / 2006 01 / 14 / 2006 ..mo - 1 ^m' • illailMENIMPI - y 01 / 14 / 2006 . T imr 01 / 14 / 2006 M ire 01 / 14/2006 01 / 14 / 2006 Hello