The URL can be used to link to this page

Browse Search

Home My WebLink About20061964 Page 1 of 1 Esther Gesick From: Chris Gathman Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2006 5:07 PM To: Robb@CassedayCreativeDesigns.com; Linda Hulse Cc: Drew Scheltinga; Esther Gesick Subject: PF-1090 continuance Robb, I understand that PF-1090 is likely going to be continued. You should probably coordinate with Esther Gesick at Clerk to the Board on hearing dates. Then send a formal written request for a continuance. Be sure to leave enough time to address all of Public Works concerns, allow for adequate Public Works review time and allow for time for Planning Staff to prepare the recommendation to the Board. You do not want to have the Board continue the case again if at all possible. Chris 7/14/2006 2006-1964 Page 1 of 2 Esther Gesick From: Robb R Casseday [robb@cassedaycreativedesigns.com] Sent: Friday, July 14, 2006 3:50 PM To: Esther Gesick; Chris Gathman Cc: brad@keirnes.com; 'Tom Frame'; linda@cassedaycreativedesigns.com Subject: RE: PF-1090 continuance Attachments: Continuance Letter to WCBOCCs.doc Esther: Please ask for a date of Wednesday, October 4th, 2006. Thank you. Best Regards, Robb Robb R. Casseday, ALA,NCARB Architect Planner 55 South Elm Avenue, Ste.210 Eaton,CO 80615 (970)454-8740 phone&fax (970) 381-6022 cell robb@CassedayCreativeDesigns.com www.CassedayCreativeDesigns.com CORRECTNESS: If you have any questions or concerns please contact us. Otherwise at information found on this email and its attachments will be considered coned. CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail is intended solely for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged information. Any review,dissemination,copying,printing or other use of this e-mail by persons or entities other than the addressee is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error,please contact the sender immediately and delete the material from your computer. From: Esther Gesick [mailto:egesick@co.weld.co.us] Sent: Friday, July 14, 2006 2:30 PM To: Chris Gathman Cc: robb@cassedaycreativedesigns.com Subject: RE: PF-1090 continuance Chris and Robb, The Board is going to need a date specific to continue to...how far out are we talking? Esther From: Chris Gathman Sent: Friday, July 14, 2006 2:12 PM To: Esther Gesick Subject: FW: PF-1090 continuance From: Robb R Casseday [mailto:robb@cassedaycreativedesigns.com] 7/20/2006 Page 2 of 2 Sent: Friday, July 14, 2006 1:58 PM To: Chris Gathman Cc: brad@keirnes.com; 'Tom Frame'; linda@cassedaycreativedesigns.com Subject: RE: PF-1090 continuance Chris and Esther: Attached please find our formal request to the Board to Continue the Eagle View PUD (PF-1090) hearing date. If you have any questions or concerns, please let me know as soon as possible. Thanks and have a good weekend. Best Regards, Robb Robb R.Casseday,A1A, NCARB Architect/Planner 55 South Elm Avenue, Ste. 210 Eaton,CO 80615 (970)454-8740 phone&fax (970)381-6022 cell robb@a CassedayCreativeDesigns.com www.CassedayCreativeDesigns.com CORRECTNESS: ff you have any questions or concerns please contact us. Otherwise at information found on this email and Its attachments wN be considered correct. CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail is intended solely for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged information. Any review,dissemination,copying,printing or other use of this e-mail by persons or entities other than the addressee is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error,please contact the sender immediately and delete the material from your computer. From: Chris Gathman [mailto:cgathman@co.weld.co.us] Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2006 5:07 PM To: Robb@CassedayCreativeDesigns.com; Linda Hulse Cc: Drew Scheltinga; Esther Gesick Subject: PF-1090 continuance Robb, I understand that PF-1090 is likely going to be continued. You should probably coordinate with Esther Gesick at Clerk to the Board on hearing dates. Then send a formal written request for a continuance. Be sure to leave enough time to address all of Public Works concerns, allow for adequate Public Works review time and allow for time for Planning Staff to prepare the recommendation to the Board. You do not want to have the Board continue the case again if at all possible. Chris 7/20/2006 Casseday Creative Designs, LLC 55 South Elm Avenue, Suite 210 Eaton, CO 80615 July 20,2006 Weld County Commissioners 915 10th Street Greeley,CO 80632 Dear Commissioners: This letter is written to request that the Eagle View PUD Subdivision Final Plat hearing scheduled for Wednesday,July 26,2006 be continued. The unexpected need has arisen to conduct additional engineering work to address additional questions raised by Public Works that require the input and cooperation of CDOT and/or Ogilvy Irrigation and Land Company,the owners of Seeley Lake and its inlet ditch. Sincerely, Robb R.Casseday,AIA Architect/Planner CC: Brad Keirnes Chris Gathman Esther Gesick Casseday Creative Designs, LLC Architecture — Planning — Environmental Compliance — Graphic Design (970) 454-8740 — (970) 454-8742 fax enzittl:robb@CeessetlayCreatioc•De,igrrs.com nun. ir,sedrryC retell neDe.i,cn .om t:� I}sist�1�I3 A!>47:1 _ 10/02/2006 09:16 3035723516 DUKE ENERGY PAGE D2/02 IlliDuice DUKE ENERGY FIELD SERVICES IEnergy Rittht of way 2324 North 7(h Aven(ic Fit1d Services Gree'ev, CO 80631 970 356 9700 303 572 3516 tax October 2. 2006 Casseday Creative Designs, LLC Attention: Linda Hulse 55 South Elm Avenue, Suite 210 Eaton, CO 80615 Re: Ridgeview/Eagle View Farms DEFS Pipeline Relocation/Abandonment Dear Linda: Duke Energy Field Services, LP has reviewed the drawing you provided indicating the location of our pipeline to be relocated. As drafted, Operations sec no conflicts with the understanding the pipeline will require a minimum of 4-feet of cover, no trees within our 20-foot easement, and access in the event of repair or maintenance. The walking trail. poses no issues as defined within the drawing. If you have any questions or concerns,please feel free to contact me at (970)378-6351. Best regards, Duke Energy Field Services,LP a:///i ic-ort-7 Lew Hagenlock Right of Way Manager LH/lc EXHIBIT I,.irnr f'rn:lranlc5, 1.1.P SS Sohrlr F,1m Soo,. 200 Er ree Crrl utalr Rfie•:S \ BRA 57S 9154 WAN ra.4:it nc•,cn+» • KEIRNES' September 29, 2006 David Fagerberg 3527 Cindy Place Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Dave: This letter serves to acknowledge our mutual understanding that the underdrain serving a portion of your property east of Weld County Road 35 may be realigned and reinstalled in conjunction with the development of Eagle View Farms PUD. The manner of the realignment and reinstallation of the underdrain will be at the discretion of Eagle View Farms so tong as it provides positive drainage from the manhole in the northeast corner of the PUD parcel which the underdrain enters that serves your property to the cast of WCR 35. Please acknowledge your agreement hereunder by signing below. Thank you very much. Sincerely, Brad Keirnes Manager Eagle View Farms, LLC Signed this 3C7_day of September, 2006, by: David Fagerberg EXHIBIT MEMORANDUM wilge TO: Board of County Commissioners 10/4/2006 .44 COLORADO FROM: Chris Gathman - Planner II SUBJECT: Proposed amendments to PF-1090 resolution 1) Condition 1.B should be amended: the date of the referral response shall be changed from "July 25, 2006" to "September 25, 2006". 2) Condition 1.S should be amended: This pertains to the underdrain easements: this condition s'hould be amended to read: "There are two existing pipes that drain farm ground located to the east of County Road 35 (one on the north end of the development and one in the center). The applicant intends to replace the existing underdrain pipes and reroute them along the north end of the PUD. This drain system will not be owned and should not be maintained by the Homeowner's Association. A signed and recorded easement agreement covering the proposed underdrain shall be submitted to the Departments Public Works of Planning Services." 3) This condition should be added and renumbered as condition 1.T: "The applicant shall provide a signed and recorded easement agreement with the Ogilvy Irrigating and Land Company covering the proposed easement located on the western edge of the PUD." 4) Condition S (should read U) — item 11 should read: "The ditch easement between Ridgeview Farms, LLC and the Ogilvy Irrigating and Land Company shall be shown and dimensioned on the plat. The recording information in regards to the easement shall be indicated." 5) Condition S (should read U) — Item 14 should be removed. (No site triangles are required). SERVICE.TEAMWORK.INTEGRITY.QUALITY EXH'BIT to kcirnes Companies, LLP 55 South Hill Menus Suer 200 Eauoo. Colorado no6!S Fax assn 5.9254 w.keirn eceem KEIRNES' October 2, 2006 Don Wacker, President Ogilvy Irrigating and Land Company 822 7th Street, Ste 760 Greeley, CO 80631 Re: Eagle View Farms PUD situated on 63 acres southwest of the intersection of WCR 35 and SH 392 in Weld County, Colorado. Dear Don: Please acknowledge your review and finding of no conflicts with the Final Construction Plans and Final Plat dated September 12, 2006, including the revisions to be made thereto as generally depicted on Exhibits A (North Ditch Segment-- Easement)and Exhibit B (South Ditch Segment —Reconfigured Detention Pond)attached hereto, and that ditch activities have been adequately incorporated into the design of the site for the above referenced development that borders the Seeley Lake Inlet Ditch, by signing below. This acknowledgement shall also include approval of the continuing discharge of any groundwater from the relocated underdrain beneath the project property and to the continued discharge of stormwater from the site via the planned stormwater detention system into the Seeley Lake Inlet Ditch, as shown on the above referenced plans. Thank you very much. Sincerely, 6:15z„.0 / Brad Reines Manager Eagle View Farms, LLC Ogilvy Irrigating and Land Company hereby acknowledges and approves the above referenced matters this 3 day of 6Pc is S , 2006, by: Signed: �e�c/�J Name: DONALD G LJitC_J<E Title: fire c /of e,h EXHIBIT �4Orb i---L,77-V OA-J T I • Ot I I 3.: If I c Dc 1 I I 1 ; + • r , LOT7 �I I\ 1.753 acres U 1 \ 1\` \ y \ • \ I — \\ d 1 1 LOT 8 EA GL \ \ \ � \1 ` 1.76± acres — A A. »- v • V\ N \ A' \ LOT 9 \\ \ \ 1.75± acres \ v , \ \_- \ \. V V. ` v \ V y LOT 12 1 ,I 1.76± acres I ) 1 I ' A A -- — r � II \\ I ANN' OUTLOT A NVA 13.36± acres 06 15' Utility @i o / Od, ..h___\ -�""""� M�8 Drainage a! 10' Irrigation \ 2 yp 20' Utility and re : .Sh Vii, Easement N Easement 0 Drainage Easement �d --;•P an ° LOT 10 °{y v LOT 3 !P1.77₹ acres 1 acres .. '� LOT 9 -1°' 'v 'Ra. 1h 1.75± acres 'r+' 15 Utility k' dW v 533.13'20'5 1101470 �I N "y .� Drainage Easement �W ---79.54' Algid,"� a. W. ICr; �� 533't 3'20'5 CICC 11111 20' Utility k m—. m ,r d'.' e. I1 I Drainage Easement — y� y LOT 11 68.25' r. 10' Irrigation .8 41, _.I. +.X a 1.763 acres 9 p' . p 20' Utility $/; ;m ',3 /Easement y and Drainage q"1 u' e• ,6� H. 2', Easement 60' Right of Way 59 - 9} 10, 0� LO .76₹ `�, +o'\-rL� ;3� 10� ^,....„....._ 20' Utility and ��8 1�1v �'�to ..8 00, �,g• Drainage Easement 1 J b , P C33 15' Utility & � �+ �hbb5ti ��,p• S*y� . �,�7g'- �,�T"�`� Drainage Easement LOT 12 2'� to 5. " �ti��QO �yh3 f° \_20 Utility and 1J6₹ acres ice,/ 711 ,//t,/ b'S�� 0 J� 4 Q �� 60' Ri ht of Drainage Easement 78 {y3, /i171i/7 4o• 5� �� ^ 20' Utility and mo ? 21717 i �`��.' C:c .2 �;• Drainage Easement "' I. '3 `�• y i 022 031 + 71 w� G'° Gam/ Gbi.., 15' Utility & m �� . , 10' Irrigation Drainage Easement IA 10' irrigation '°'- � Easement a u /Easement 023 o 9311,71, - o - LOT 15 372 51 ° N823529 E_ Z45— 1.J5₹ acres , _ o� 7ti N8735 29 E Y65 20 ��C Jg t° 20' Utility and ' 20'-Utility & - — tY \,t°• Drainage Easement .7 a 0 " Drainage 15' Utility h� , . reo Easement Drainage Easement o - I OUTLOT C 10' 2ti i LOT 16 L28.00' dia. ` ]( . 1.76₹ acres '00 landscape island d3 to 0/ \ OUTLOT A mow;. LOT 13 LOT 14 t° S•ec./ 10' Irrigation o NI 13.36₹ acres o'.,. 1.75₹ acres 1.713 acres ., Easement t,, N 20' Utility and _ (1p• �'�� 30' 3t Drainage Easements \ LIit; ; Wi ° o u, � I gib* t• . ,"' and EasemeDrainant �ti0/ 20 Utility and J 'Sr O ✓✓ y '\ Drainage Easement tiJ^ I rt.T \ in 20' Utility and o� 15' Utilityasem & i o ,n .� ^ Drainage Easement ta- o 20' Utility kf - Drainage p 0 Drainage Easement Easement 4 LOT 17 nl C)0, ,o_ ,r° 176₹ acres al 0 OG, L A ` - ' lIto' I I I .I 552465/ 5832' --- - 129' o ^io 20' Uti ty4 ondr�✓„ t 8847. ��IQy W 1 I2, N 388 _- _ OOi N Drainage Easement ryl� � P }.+ ' 2990— NIA LOT 18 10' Irrigation �Up I 1.74₹ acres Easement b ti W TLOT A b � lQ \ \ 3.363 acres /U 'r 50 031 N Q4 58 Cr NOF43'31 O/I/II1`, - 120.31' 'VI,O 56-r2.5 7468. . 015 in 3 019 20' Utility R ..i061-15- t o LOT 19 Drainage Easement NI1I11 �W�+{' -1 g i1jjst'//' 1.653 acres ho' 15' Utility t \ r 1�//' ,.✓� „hp Drainage Easement 30 I m LOT 20 \ at r3 1.76₹ acres \ a? .ho Z. 20' Utility and '� 10•I �r^ Drainage Easement �y9 Jr Ditch Easement \ ,L°i \ 20' Utility & Drainage Easement 179.31 _— --- -- _, 47582' • __-.-. { !� -... .. _ _ _ -584"37�5�-E ]'4ita^ „..(---76-1.74, v N89'37'58"w 1353.05' Corner I ,R—SR Revisions to Proposed Resolution of Approval October 4,2006 Revisions/Corrections: Para 2.f. WCR 35 requires a left hand turn lane be constructed as requested by Weld County Department of Public Works. An improvements agreement has been submitted to and approved by Public Works which addresses the safe design of the turn lane and the proposed cost necessary for construction of the turn lane improvement to WCR 35 both of which will be completed by the applicant. Para I.B. The applicant shall address the concerns and comments of the Department of Public Works,as stated in referral responses dated September 22 and 25,2006. Written evidence of such shall be submitted to the Weld County Department of Planning Services. Any and all conditions in the referral responses relating to the Ogilvy Ditch have been addressed and are deemed to be satisfied by the agreement between the applicant and the ditch company dated October 2, 2006(a copy of the letter is made a part of this resolution). Any and all conditions in the referral responses relating to underdrainage of the Fagerberg property onto and across the applicant's property have been addressed and are deemed to be satisfied by the letter submitted by the applicant to and approved by Fagerberg dated September 29,2006(a copy of the letter is made a part of this resolution). Any and all conditions in the referral responses relating to the use of an exclusive easement granted to Duke Energy have been addressed and are deemed to be satisfied by the letter provided by Duke Energy dated October 2,2006 (a copy of the letter is made a part of this resolution). Any required modifications to the Final Plat and Construction Drawings consistent with the above correspondence shall be approved by the Department of Public Works prior to the recording of the final plat. Public Works shall notify the Department of Planning Services of such approval prior to recording of the plat. Easements for the proposed underdrain and the additional agreed upon easement for the Ogilvy Ditch shall be signed and recorded and submitted to Public Works. Such easements shall be shown on the Final Plat and Construction Drawings as necessary. 4.A. "Eaton"shall be substituted for"Ault". Additional Conditions to Resolution: New Para I.C. The north line of lot 7 and the west line of lots 7, 8, 9, and 12 shall be fenced with five(5) foot solid fencing in satisfaction of comments in the September 25,2006 Public Works memo concerning accessibility to the Ogilvy Ditch. Deletions to Resolution: o Opening comment. o I.C. o I.D. o I.L. o I.R. o I.S. o I.S.13. EXHIBIT I EXHIBITS J AND K NOT SCANNED LARGE MAPS CAN BE VIEWED IN FILE Hello