HomeMy WebLinkAbout20071327.tiff WIWDc. SITE PLAN REVIEW
COLORADO Administrative Review
Planner: Michelle Martin
Case Number: Site Plan Review SPR-407
Parcel Number: 1471 30 400103
Applicant: Neal and Judith Foster (Foster Equipment)
Legal Description: Lot A of Amended Corrected RE-470 being Pt. of SE4 of Section 30, Township 1
North, Range 66 West of the 6th P.M. Weld County, Colorado
Zoning: 1-3 Industrial Zone District
Proposed Use: Site Plan Review for an office building for heavy equipment sales, service,
warehouse, and maintenance building for heavy equipment
Site Plan Review Standards
Meets the Intent of
Comments the Weld County
Code
Site Plan Certification Included in Application YES
Retention Facilities Refer to the Weld County Department of Public Works NO
Engineering Dept. referral dated 11/21/06
Off-street Parking The applicant shall delineate 29 parking spaces NO
Loading Areas YES
Access Need to address the concerns as stated in the referral NO
dated 11/21/06 from the Department of Public Works
Setback Requirements 25 Feet YES
Offset Requirements 10 Feet YES
Landscaping Need to address Section 23-3-350.G.1 of the Weld NO
County Code
Trash Collection and Need to address Section 23-3-350.H of the Weld NO
Storage County Code
Potable Water Well # 116824 YES
Sewage Disposal Septic YES
Environment Standards YES
Property Maintenance Need to address Section 23-3-360.G of the Weld NO
County Code
/L /j293
2007-1327
SPR-407 Foster Page 1
This site plan review is approved with the attached conditions:
1. Prior to recording the Site Plan Review plat, the applicant shall address the following to the
Department of Planning Services' satisfaction:
The applicant shall submit a waste handling plan, for approval, to the Environmental
Health Services Division of the Weld County Department of Public Health & Environment.
Evidence of their approval shall be submitted to the Weld County Department of Planning
Services. The plan shall include at a minimum, the following:
1) A list of wastes which are expected to be generated on site (this should include
expected volumes and types of waste generated).
2) A list of the type and volume of chemicals expected to be stored on site.
3) The waste handler and facility where the waste will be disposed (including the facility
name, address, and phone number). (Department of Public Health and Environment)
The applicant shall attempt to address the requirements (concerns) of Greater Brighton
r Fire Protection District, as stated in the referral response dated 10/31/06. Evidence of
such shall be submitted in writing to the Weld County Department of Planning Services.
(Greater Brighton Fire Protection District)
y
The applicant shall address the requirements (concerns) of the Colorado Department of
Transportation, as stated in the referral response dated 11/7/06. Evidence of such shall
be submitted in writing to the Weld County Department of Planning Services. (Colorado
Department of Transportation)
The applicant shall address the requirements (concerns) of the Office of the State
Engineer, Division of Water Resources, as stated in the referral response dated 10/30/06.
Evidence of such shall be submitted in writing to the Weld County Department of
Planning Services. (Division of Water Resources)
The applicant shall provide written evidence of a repermitted well for outside irrigation,
provide an irrigation plan detailing how the proposed landscaping will be irrigated, or
propose another form of landscaping that complies with Section 23-3-350.G of the Weld
County Code. (Department of Planning Services)
E. The application shall revise the Landscape / Screening Plan in accordance with Section
23-3-350.G, delineating the following information:
An installation schedule which specifies when the landscaping will be installed on
site. (Department of Planning Services)
No more than eighty-five percent (85%) of the total area of a lot in any
Commercial Zone District shall be covered. Land shall not be deemed covered if
it is used for growing grass, shrubs, trees, plants or flowers or if covered by
decorative gravel or wood chips, or if it is otherwise suitably landscaped.
(Department of Planning Services)
The landscape / Screening Plan shall address Section 23-3-350.B of the Weld
County Code regarding sufficient screened off-street parking. (Department of
Planning Services)
4. The landscape / Screening Plan shall address Section 23-3-360.G of the Weld
County Code regarding property maintenance. (Department of Planning
Services)
SPR-407 Foster Page 2
The applicant shall either submit a copy of an agreement with the property's mineral
owner/operators stipulating that the oil and gas activities have been adequately
incorporated into the design of the site or show evidence that an adequate attempt has
been made to mitigate the concerns of the mineral owner/operators. Drill envelopes can
be delineated on the plat in accordance with the State requirements as an attempt to
mitigate concerns. The plat shall be amended to include any possible future drilling sites.
(Department of Planning Services)
/
G. ) The applicant has submitted a Private Improvements Agreement according to policy
regarding collateral for improvements and post adequate collateral for all landscaping,
transportation (access drive, parking areas, et-cetera) and non-transportation (plant
materials, fencing, screening, water, signage et-cetera). The applicant shall submit to the
Department of Planning Services an itemized landscaping bid for review. The agreement
and form of collateral shall be reviewed by County Staff and accepted by the Board of
County Commissioners prior to recording the Site Plan Review plat. Or the applicant
may submit evidence that all the work has been completed and approved by the
Department of Planning Services and the Department of Public Works. (Department of
Planning Services)
The plat shall be amended to delineate the following:
All pages of the plat shall be labeled Site Plan Review SPR-407. (Department of
Planning Services)
The Site Plan Review Map shall be prepared in accordance with Section 23-2-
160.V of the Weld County Code, specifically to scale and label all adjacent
County Roads. (Department of Planning Services)
,a.✓✓✓ The vicinity map shall be delineated on the plat in compliance with Section 23-2-
160.V.6 of the Weld County Code, specifically illustrating the parcel and
surrounding parcels. (Department of Planning Services)
The approved Landscape /Screening Plan. (Department of Planning Services)
The sight distance triangles shall be delineated on the plat. Any existing
landscaping within the sight distance triangles shall be removed and relocated.
(Department of Public Works)
The applicant shall provide at a minimum twenty-nine (29) parking stalls for this
facility of which two (2) must meet the requirements of the Americans with
l Disabilities Act. The dimensions of the parking stalls shall adhere to Section 23-
4-30 and Appendix 23-A of the Weld County Code. This site will be required to
meet all requirements of the American Disability Act (ADA). ADA parking spaces
are twenty (20) feet by eight (8) feet with five (5) foot aisles. A minimum of one
space must be van accessible with an eight (8) foot aisle. An accessible path
shall be required from the building to the public right-of-way. Further, the ramps
from the parking area shall identify a landing area for non-ambulatory users of
this facility. (Department of Planning Services)
The applicant shall delineate the location of curb stops in the parking areas per
Section 23-4-30.D of the Weld County Code. (Department of Planning Services)
The applicant shall show the type of lighting that will be used on site in
conformance with the Weld County Code. (Department of Planning Services)
SPR-407 Foster Page 3
( 2 The location and dimensions of any proposed signs per Article IV Division 2 of
the Weld County Code. (Department of Planning Services)
Section 23-3-250.A.6 of the Weld County Code addresses the issue of trash
collection areas. Areas used for storage or trash collection shall be screened
from adjacent public rights-of-way and adjacent properties. These areas shall be
designed and used in a manner that will prevent wind or animal scattered trash.
/// (Department of Planning Services)
County Road 4 is classified by the County as a local paved road, which requires
80 feet of right-of-way at full build out. The applicant shall verify the existing right-
of-way and the documents creating the right-of-way. If the right-of-way cannot be
verified, it shall be dedicated. The plat shall delineate the existing right-of-way
and the documents which created it along with any additional right-of-way
reservation required. (Department of Public Works)
/16 The two approved access into the site from County Road 4. (Department of
Public Works)
The following notes shall be placed on the plat:
1. All proposed or existing structures will or do meet the minimum setback and
offset requirements for the zone district in which the property is located.
Pursuant to the definition of setback in the Weld County Code, the required
setback is measured from the future rights-of-way line.
2. In the event that a portion of the building is proposed to be leased or sold to
another party in the future, the applicant shall submit a copy of the lease of sales
agreement and information regarding the proposed use of the leased portion to
the Weld County Building Inspection Department, Mountain View Fire Protection
District and the Department of Planning Services for review. Based upon the
proposed use and/or impacts of the leased portion, the Department of Planning
Services may require a new Site Plan Review application. (Department of
Planning Services)
3. In accordance with the Weld County Code, no land, building or structure shall be
changed in use or type of occupancy, developed, erected, constructed,
reconstructed, moved or structurally altered or operated in the Commercial and
Industrial Zone District until a Site Plan Review has been approved by the
Department of Planning Services. (Department of Planning Services)
4. All liquid and solid wastes (as defined in the Solid Wastes Disposal Sites and
Facilities Act, 30-20-100, C.R.S., as amended), shall be stored and removed for
final disposal in a manner that protects against surface and groundwater
contamination. (Department of Public Health and Environment)
5. No permanent disposal of wastes shall be permitted at this site. This is not meant
to include those wastes specifically excluded from the definition of a solid waste
in the Solid Wastes Disposal Sites and Facilities Act, 30-20-100.5,C.R.S., as
amended. (Department of Public Health and Environment)
6. Waste materials shall be handled, stored and disposed of in a manner that
controls fugitive dust, blowing debris and other potential nuisance conditions.
(Department of Public Health and Environment)
SPR-407 Foster Page 4
7. The applicant shall operate in accordance with the approved "waste handling
plan". (Department of Public Health and Environment)
8. The facility shall adhere to the maximum permissible noise levels allowed in the
Commercial Zone District, as delineated in 25-12-103, Colorado Revised
Statutes. (Department of Public Health and Environment)
9. Fugitive dust and fugitive particulate emissions shall be controlled on this site.
(Department of Public Health and Environment)
10. Sewage disposal for the facility shall be by septic system. Any septic system
located on the property must comply with all provisions of the Weld County Code,
pertaining to Individual Sewage Disposal Systems. (Department of Public Health
and Environment)
11. Adequate hand washing and toilet facilities shall be provided for employees and
patrons of the facility. (Department of Public Health and Environment)
12. The facility shall utilize the existing commercially permitted well. (Commercial
Well # 116824) (Department of Public Health and Environment)
13. All potentially hazardous chemicals must be stored and handled in a safe manner
in accordance with product labeling and in a manner that minimizes the release
of hazardous air pollutants (HAP's) and volatile organic compounds (VOC's).
(Department of Public Health and Environment)
14. If applicable, the applicant shall obtain a stormwater discharge permit from the
Colorado Department of Public Health & Environment, Water Quality Control
Division. (Department of Public Health and Environment)
15. The operation/property shall comply with all applicable rules and regulations of
the State and Federal agencies and the Weld County Code. (Department of
Public Health and Environment)
16. A building permit application must be completed, and two complete sets of
engineered plans bearing the wet stamp of a Colorado registered architect or
engineer must be submitted for review. A geotechnical engineering report
preformed by a registered State of Colorado engineer shall be required.
(Department of Building Inspection)
17. A plan review must be approved and permit must be issued prior to the start of
construction. (Department of Building Inspection)
18. The new construction and/or change of use shall conform to the requirements of
the 2003 International Building Code, the 2005 National Electrical Code and
Chapter 29 of the Weld County Code. (Department of Building Inspection)
19. Setback and offset distance shall be determined by the 2003 International
Building Code and Chapter 23 of the Weld County Code, (Offset and setback
distances are measured from the farthest projection from the structure).
(Department of Building Inspection)
20. Prior to the release of building permit, the applicant shall submit evidence of
approval from the Greater Brighton Fire Protection District to the Weld County
Building Department.
21. Landscaping materials as indicated in the approved Landscape / Screening Plan
shall be maintained at all times. Dead or diseased plant materials shall be
SPR-407 Foster Page 5
replaced with materials of similar quantity and quality at the earliest possible
time. (Department of Planning Services)
22. Lighting shall comply with the requirements and standards for off-street parking
spaces per Section 23-4-30.E, Section 23-2-250.D and Section 23-3-250.8.6 of
the Weld County Code. (Department of Planning Services)
23. All structures, including signs, on site must obtain the appropriate building
permits. (Department of Planning Services)
24. Effective January 1, 2003, Building Permits issued on the proposed lots will be
required to adhere to the fee structure of the Weld County Road Impact Program.
(Ordinance 2002-11) (Department of Planning Services)
25. Effective August 1, 2005, Building permits issued on the subject site will be
required to adhere to the fee structure of the Capital Expansion Impact Fee and
the Stormwater/Drainage Impact Fee. (Ordinance 2005-8 Section 5-8-40)
(Department of Planning Services)
26. The property owner shall allow any mineral owner the right of ingress or egress
for the purposes of exploration development, completion, recompletion, re-entry,
production and maintenance operations associated with existing or future
operations located on these lands. (Department of Planning Services)
2. Prior to Operation:
A. A stormwater discharge permit may be required for a
developmenUredevelopment/construction site where a contiguous or non-contiguous land
disturbance is greater than or equal to one acre in area. The applicant shall inquire with
the Water Quality Control Division (WQCD)of the Colorado Department of Public Health
and Environment at www.cdphe.state.co.us/wq/PermitsUnit if they are required to obtain
a stormwater discharge permit. Alternately, the applicant can provide evidence from
WQCD that they are not subject to these requirements. (Department of Public Health
and Environment)
3. Prior to the Issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy:
A. An individual sewage disposal system is required for the proposed office and shop
buildings and shall be installed according to the Weld County Individual Sewage Disposal
Regulations. (Department of Public Health and Environment)
B. The septic system is required to be designed by a Colorado Registered Professional
Engineer according to the Weld County Individual Sewage Disposal Regulations.
(Department of Public Health and Environment)
Site Plan Review conditionally approved by: Michelle Martin, Planner II
Date: January 4, 2007
SPR-407 Foster Page 6
a DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES
SOUTHWEST OFFICE
4209 CR 24.5
LONGMONT, CO 80504
PHONE: (720)652-4210, Ext. 8730
FAX: (720) 652-4211
'Ripe
COLORADO
October 26, 2006
Neal &Judith Foster
do Randall King
300 Madison Av
Loveland CO 80537
Subject SPR-407 -Site Plan Review for office building for heavy equipment sales, service warehouse
and maintenance building for heavy equipment located on a parcel of land described as Lot A
of Amended Corrected RE-470; being part of the SE4 of Section 30, Ti N, R66W of the 6th
P.M., Weld County, Colorado.
Dear :
Your application and related materials for the request described above are complete and in order at this time.
Our Department will be processing the Site Plan within 60 days upon receipt of the application. You will be
notified by this office at the end of the review period regarding the site plan.
It is the policy of Weld County to refer an application of this nature to any town or municipality lying within three
miles of the property in question or if the property under consideration is located within the comprehensive
planning area of a town or municipality. Therefore,our office has forwarded a copy of the submitted materials
to the Brighton, Fort Lupton and Lochbuie Planning Commission for their review and comments. It is
recommended that you and/or a representative be in attendance at the Brighton, Fort Lupton and Lochbuie
Planning Commission meeting to answer any questions the Commission members may have with respect to
your application. Please call Brighton at(303)655-2023,Fort Lupton at(303)857-6694 and Lochbuie at(303)
655-9308, for further details regarding the date, time, and place of the meeting.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please feel free to call or visit our office.
Sincer ly,
yea.
e Gt/J
Michelle Martin
Planner
• n •
\ . . .
VJ
N V
LL
U
o
.\_. .
c c
1 Q N
Li :;
L_ 0-
• c c:.5
co
\---\.•
a)Qtm
U' a p .
0] Q c
CD cn
D • Q
• •
S \\11 . •
•
en
E � \ \ \ • ,
ca cv-2
z _
'O - N Vl 2 N ai r-a U " .V -2-70
2. W U N -2 't. N
0 Ea m -ca) c - mE 'CDLmC) •
rs via 0 ctt 3 EU � U1 c vY otJ •
m c0 ,c. c3Eo moac.) —
N! , 709. 0 a L N a a^ y to i.- • � t U N U 5 LL L V
L.1 'U 2 c co'
m
a H
= w E
m ml
toll l -I : i ! L i J: I , i i I I i i i t - c o -.I ! i
SITE PLAN REVIEW (SPR) APPLICATION
FOR PLANNING DEPARTMENT USE DATE RECEIVED:
RECEIPT#/AMOUNT# 1$ CASE #ASSIGNED:
APPLICATION RECEIVED BY PLANNER ASSIGNED:
Parcel Number I l 7 I - 3 O - ' - 0 n - 1 o 3-
(12 digit number-found on Tax I.D.iinformation,obtainable at the Weld County Assessor's Office, or www.co.weld.co.us).
in
Legal Description See €Nvll DT 11 , Section ao, Township I North, Range tp(pWest
LoUBlock: N IA Zone District: 13 , Total Acreage: `7 , Overlay District: /1/0i7e_,
FEE OWNER(S) OF THE PROPERTY:
Name: Ne& D. Pus-fez
Work Phone#C 2P-3)i)le A9 — 3900 Home Phone#60-1)04 —4:B y2Email Address:
Address: 28 )3 Cortina Lane / Everjreen Colorado 80139
City/State/Zip Code y�
Name: 3Ud 1T1 f . RR-Fef-
Work Phone# Home Phone#l!o )&71/—�1/2EmailAddress:
Address: 2513 Cortina, Lane/ Fve.ymQn Co/on7do BDy39
City/State/Zip Code
Name:
Work Phone# Home Phone# Email Address:
Address:
City/State/Zip Code
APPLICANT OR AUTHORIZED AGENT(See Below:Authorization must accompany applications signed by Authorized Agent)
Name: Kl
Work Phone#(q]0) -307 Home Phone# Email Address: lefi 0 -rYl I , coYY1
Address: 300 Ha rson Avenue / Loveland Colorado BOSS?
City/State/Zip Code
PROPOSED USE: I fo
Sev ice i.�r]YP ISP �j In3 %
o {'IR]y� -ECIU r
I (We) hereby depose and state under penalties of perjury that all statements, proposals, and/or plans submitted with
or contained within the application are true and correct to the best of my(our)knowledge. Signatures of all fee owners
of property must sign this application. If an Authorized Agent signs, a letter of authorization from all fee owners must
be included with-tft application. If a corporation is the fee owner, notarized evidence must be included showing the
signatory has'to I al authority to si4n for the corporation.
' :'..< 1 v-7 � : t t � -Z- 1 ,'�.
i.
Signature: Ow r or Authorized Agent date Signature: Owner or Authorized Agent Date
-3-
EMERGENCY CONTACT INFORMATION
PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT
Business Name: F?ete Egv/pmen+ ampanullnrzPhone:St ) Q059 --3c oO
Address: 1 / JJ �p
Business Owner: Neal F(7Sf>r Phone:(30 ) 059— v 11)0
Home Address: 2813 Co r-h nQ bane City: EVCrire
List three persons in the order to be called in the event of an emergency:
NAME TITLE ADDRESS PHONE
Rul
er er Pfes_rciei & (3O ) 229-5070
Rob 3ordon Used Equ',per)* Manage,,' -ftee
l:lnda Wllen Df/OCe, Mona?'" J O7c) 311 - 0190
Business Hours: S:DtQnl S :DO 2rn Days: MOYLJG�yI " 1 rids? /
Type of Alarm: None Burglar r/ / Holdf(u_pI, Fire Silent (Audible)
Name and address of alarm company: ii-re TQ�hOlOgl� - LOVe)ahci
Location of Safe: 11111 J
MISCELLANEOUS INFORMATION:
Number of entry/exit doors in this building: S Location(s): '2. OA) Nor-H4 I on-. sow'fk
2. OM Is alcohol alcohol stored in building? ,NO Location(s):
Are drugs stored in building? /t/O Location(s):
Are weapons stored in building? NO Location(s):
The following programs are offered as a public service of the Weld County Sheriff's Office. Please indicate the
programs of interest. Physical Security Check Crime Prevention Presentation
UTILITY SHUT OFF LOCATIONS:
Main electrical: (-Jes.t Ua el2 R',c1et o(' O-F O- 'cc.. pw'IStj
Gas shut off: t4 4i Cud-e..br OJ.6:c.e IIua-,Icili+a.qJ
Exterior water shutoff: Sc y:14\ � yn-
\ Wei.t � 4er ///1P�
Interior water shutoff: IM ec 14e-w'cak/' DD 7�EX7n /1-I�c Si-' e�+�"� Q14-1 C
Litt
-5-
n n
it,* ZNIL-- , DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES
Idy l SOUTHWEST4209 CR CFFICE
24.5
COLORADO LONGMONT, CO 80504
PHONE: (720)652-4210, Ext. 8730
FAX: (720)652-4211
Application being sumbitted: S PR
Submittal fee: I cat. Check# z2.$` ) Cash
i
Name of person submitting: c ...S ( 47 k,,,,5
Contact name(if different from above):
Telephone number. er?7,o-`roq- wry" E-mail: Z de. .C,-,; _ ri,t„
The Department of Planning Services is accepting the paperwork for this Land Use Application with
the understanding that the application has not been determined to be a complete application with
all of the appropriate documents and exhibits.
The Department of Planning Services will determine prior to the end of the next business day
whether the submitted documents are in compliance with the Weld County Code,and as such,shall
be deemed a complete application.
The Department of Planning Services shall also determine prior to the end of the next business day
whether the submitted fees are appropriate for the requested application. Should there be a
discrepancy with the application,the Department will contact the applicant/applicant's representative
via telephone.
Land use cases will not be set up or processed until the requested application materials have been
submitted and the appropriate fees paid.
Thank you for your assistance and cooperation.
I understand and agree to the conditions stated herein: ` -- �"`--41
Signature
Signature of staff member received from: 1 A .70.
Date: (� doci `_J
WELD COUNTY, COLORADO
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES
4209 CR 24.5
LONGMONT,CO 80504
PHONE: 720-652-4210,EXT. 8730/FAX: 720-652-4211
• • r1-^
Date: I1';� , E 20 Receipt No.
l
Received From: •�.., f1
#
Permit Type No. Description Fee gt
4221-RE/SE
4221-ZPM H
4221-US R
�•4-22`1-SITE PLAN REVIEW '') ( j_ � �UU �' y
4221-CHANGE OF ZONE 1
4221-PUD
D
4221-MINOR/MAJOR SUB
# OF BUILDABLE LOTS
4221-ADDITIONAL 30% 1
FEE FOR SUB's
4221-RE-SUBDIVISIONS
4221-BOA
4221-FHDP/GHDP
4430-MAPS I POSTAGE
4430-COPIES
4730-INVESTIGATION FEE
6560-RECORDING FEE
MISC.
JJy��
JCASH CHECK NO. / TOTAL FEE
Receipted By: DL# Exp.
- t ri \ a CONTRA TLNG
Section 23-2-160
Item A
Project: Foster Equipment
Re: Application
Attached hereto is a copy of the Site Plan Review (SPR) Application.
General Contracting • Consulting • Design/Build • Construction Management
300 Madison Avenue Loveland . Colorado 80537 . 970.669.3077 . Fax: 970.669.2183
www.kingcontracting.com email: kci@frii.com
•
SITE PLAN CERTIFICATION
I (We) hereby certify that the uses, buildings, and structures located on:
See @c htb(-+ fl
(legal description)
are designed and will be constructed and operated in accordance with the applicable Performance Standards and
District Requirements for the =3 zone district as stated in the Weld County Code and in
accordance with any conditions imposed by the Board of County Commissioners at the time the property was zoned
or rezoned. I understand my failure to comply with the performance standards and/or any conditions could result in the
County initiating a compliance action against me.
•
Signature of Property Owner
The foregoing instrument was subscribed and sworn to before me this :N.& day of
20 , by Las-sc.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
My Commission expires:
NdCary Public
-4-
Page 1 of 2
Michelle Martin
From: Michelle Martin
Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2007 9:37 AM
To: 'Randy King'
Cc: Jesse Hein
Subject: RE: SPR-407
No I have not received verification of any agreement with Jess Hein. The following items still need to
be addressed per staff comments dated 1/4/07: 1.E.2, 1.E.3, 1.E.4, 1.H.4, 1.H.7, 1.H.8, 1.H.10, 1.H.11
and the improvements agreement. The Department of Public Works and the Department of Planning
Services both review the improvements agreement and this point in time the Department of Planning
Services will need to see the following changes a bid for all the landscaping, fencing, lighting (you will
need to add the fencing requirements and lighting to the exhibits). You will also need to update the
completion exhibit to be more specific(example March of 2007). The Department of Public Works is
still reviewing the improvements agreement with regards to the roads.
The paper copy of the plat is ready for pick up in our south office. Let me know if you have any
questions.
,Aptein
Planner II
4209 CR 24.5
Longmont, CO 80504
mmartin@co.weld.co.us
PHONE: (720)652-4210 x 8730
FAX: (720) 652-4211
From: Randy King [mailto:randy@kingcontracting.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2007 8:51 AM
To: Michelle Martin
Subject: RE: SPR-407
Michelle:
Jesse Helms and my engineer agreed on everything last week. Did you get verification of thatm?,
Randy King
From: Michelle Martin [mailto:mmartin@co.weld.co.us]
Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2007 8:10 AM
To: Randy King
Subject: RE: SPR-407
HI Randy,
You can pick up the red line copies of the plat for SPR-407 this afternoon from our south office. I will
also send you can email of what conditions still need to be addressed. Let me know if you have any
02/20/2007
Page 2 of 2
questions.
JILL& dinar,
Planner II
4209 CR 24.5
Longmont, CO 80504
mmartin@co.weld.co.us
PHONE: (720) 652-4210 x 8730
FAX: (720) 652-4211
From: Randy King [mailto:randy@kingcontracting.com]
Sent: Friday, February 16, 2007 1:26 PM
To: Michelle Martin
Subject: SPR-407
Since I did not get comments from you I assume the only unsatisfied person was Jesse Hein. He will be satisfied
soon thus what is our exact instructions next?
Per our January 17th meeting with the owner we need to keep this going.
Randy King
02/20/2007
4
-Cant 641
•
‘IP
soK gesare
rAgi llet.65;NS
6Y
V s. j19
CONTRACTING
Section 23-2-160
Item E
Project: Foster Equipment
Re: Detailed Use
Attached hereto is a copy of the Owners Statement Of USE.
General Contracting • Consulting • Design/Build • Construction Management
300 Madison Avenue Loveland • Colorado 80537 . 970.669.3077 . Fax: 970.669.2183
www.kingcontracting.com email: kci@frii.com
115TER
EQUIPMENT CO., INC.
12739 WELD COUNTY ROAD 4
BRIGHTON, CO 80603
303-659-3900 FAX 303-659-5158
August 7, 2006
Re: Use of Property
To Whom It May Concern,
The subject property is currently zoned 1-3.
The proposed use of the property is consistent with other properties in the area.
The basic use of the property is display and storage of heavy construction equipment for the benefit of
a construction equipment dealer, including facilities necessary for the display, sales and service of the
equipment.
Foster Equipment has been in business for over 20 years as a Construction Equipment Dealer, selling
new and used equipment to contractors, municiplalities and governmental agencies in the Rocky
Mountain region. Foster Equipment has been located and operating in the property next door to the
location of the proposed site plan application for over 15 years. We specalize mostly in equipment
related to concrete construction.
Kind regards,
Rob Jordan
BMENTCO, INC C
Summer 2006 `-
•., �xh !
O
t ^ s osh Truck C Corn
4
kPLP4 . I�
, , 4
Premier
/ t W w
i Portable Low Profile
, ' fi ,- , l
' ₹m l � , Concre B te atch Plant
!
i., _, 1
i Ilr r
ter' ti> f rk: �` iII1 1 01 Il �.> J =w. 7 ��..
` : _ �,
i LA
.j
4
t In
e� 1 • q ' -
4 y4 ,A �.
CO s CONE CO. McNei/us. SConlro
1
,,., Mo ,�,r,r.,. u— Solutions
NEW GENERATION
COMMANDER III
TRIMMERISLIPFORM PAVE
a
PAd -snail
11
mss'- .-, - __ _--- , 7►!
ar cr-3cc00
TRIMMERISLIPFOOII PRYER,"
I
• fr I. t;
b �
All
i 2,,
; 7 kli
se
l
+"r' ms's ° , . z�
5 <_-
GO O
The Worldwide Leader in Concrete Paving Technology
•ti*;MilemakerTM
• Series '" • Production capacities from 160 to 425 TPH.
• Highly portable plants for contractors
always on the move.
-� -^` x Ili,"37' • Separate drying and mixing drums ensure
Ilk v.:,::;:4' /
the lowest aggregate moisture levels
possible.
• Separate mixing drum introduces asphalt,
RAP, other additives and modifiers away
from the drying and combustion zones,
eliminating unfavorable emissions.
filtiilk • Efficiently processes up to 40% RAP.
• Straightforward plant design that's easy to
.,1 , set up, even easier to maintain.
• rt - 94 9 . • Customizing your Milemaker asphalt plant is
made easy with stationary or self-erecting
` - — sa` portable silos, slat conveyors, cold feed
- - bins, additive and RAP systems and
baghouses.
• More than 650 ADM plants sold around the
kii„ world.
i A ll1Icy,J
: iv
Illsi lllllu lllbR.be
Roacbuilderni
series
NI
• Lowest cost per ton of any parallel flow asphalt
plant in its class -.
• Unbeatable fuel efficiency and low maintenance c ,, -x.
cost
• Portable plants with quick start-up and easy -
installation 1 r,
• Easy operation with individual processors ` !r
• Minimal manpower requirement: one plant -a. !^.�i
operator, one loader operator
• Precision accuracy and control over liquid, a:
-
aggregates, and additives f ,,,,t!� ' x �? - '°t
• Standard parts and components for quick repair, -.41;44-',"11
if necessary J
8s1 us ,d -
• Complete system: dryer/mixing drum, cold feed p'• ! a 'S
bins &conveyors, silo systems, A.C.tanks with '
either baghouse or wetwash system, and many 7, `
other customizing options :. `
h
( a ("CM A
3 y
.^ ---..%
fY" to r
i
J ....„.
' f
�y
Y" �, r .! „
. �' 1
4 �.
i
! 1r #
� 1,
_ PI
r`
if ri,771. I.. :li '1„.
I
I
I 21
I.
FAUSAgi
.1 TRANS-FLO CORPORATION O INFERN-O-THERM
C Cement Blowers & Feeders Water Heaters/Chillers Concrete Drilling
it
iiniNar
Sii%
INFERN-O-THERMe Water Heaters/Chillers
.^ 2x000 to'25 000 ga/ r;.___pi, _. ,
x
Uplift Ava//a6/e: •.
r
„„,,, , ? ,,.,. : e.
WA-
F_ = t!)'
r`` �„µk H
• Insulated with 3 inch, 4 pound density"Thermafiber" mineral wool and covered with
.025"stucco embossed aluminum jacket
• "Cloverleaf'supercharger gives over 90% combustion efficiencies
•Tank is mounted on twin heavy-duty skid supports for stability& ease of transport
AMERICAN
CSHERM4L
American GeoThermal's air-cooled chiller systems are available
in 10, 15, 20 and 25 nominal hp. capacities. The system
features 2 separate refrigeration circuits. It is designed to chill
water to 35°F. Two completely independent refrigeration circuits
provide continuous operation even if one circuit should fail.
Other features include:
• Cupro-nickel heat exchangers IZIIII .
• unit-mounted water circulating pump
• CPU control (programmable controller)
• independent refrigerant gauges -
• diagnostic fault lights
• indicating thermostat w/dilution control
• freeze protection
• high voltage single point hookup
CON-E-CO. AAERJcaN WAMninifrawat
l S
.. m,.�.�..., G RMAL Valves,Gates Concrete Vibrators
REED / I
En? Tr'
Applications:
Shotcrete Foundations ' Refractory Materials r Mines
ce Concrete Pumping Slope Stabilization Slabs Backfill
Pressure Grouting Pools Rockscaping Flowable fill
C. TRANS-FLO CORPORATION
-.
NI� r _- 1i, � �
fr
--
® z
, , rr anew-
r Srwxiaea-...,ya-'
9TH
u '
Pneumatic Bulk Material Movers
• Transfers material from tanker or rail car to storage
• Transfers material from storage to process
r-
Control y � s
Solutions ". ""..earawas..sa,e,a4.05raor.,
Computer Automation System -
for Ready-Mix Plants - l�—ir % ris ,
�
,r-
silitall . ,
. .
. ...
„ .
Economic multi-gang system-ideal for highway rehab,
airport work,and lane additions
Standard 18"drill depth-farts in a 4'patch and drills within 6"
of a comer
Adjustable spacing-up to 36"or more
Totally pneumatic-requires a minimum of 200 cbn
• Full Automation Control ideal for straighdine drilling and patching
• Simple To Operate Oil Injection-individual oiling from a single reservoir
• Powered by Windows®-based hatchWareTM Optional on-grade conversion kit-drill becomes more
• Choice of Options versatile
• Fast,Accurate and Reliable Patented Si-steering feature-allows ohe operator to
maneuver with ease
nil • Auto Vibe
P • T Mo read out- 1 to - utororors
Two mode selection -auto or
manual scan I7actunuA171C*
ng Quality Products Since 1968 • Alarm settings-high and low VPM
• •
Innovative Vibrator • All vt - new e or oldcan be
retrofitted with sensors
Monitoring System nor
Auto Vibe II
• VPM readout of up to 62 vibrators while you
are paving.
• Ambient temperature and relative humidity.
• Monitor ground speed and distance traveled. Auto Vibe`" - _ • Monitor real time and job time.
• Alarm range settings to verify operating Auto Vibe III has all features of
j _ range is being maintained (audible alarm as Auto Vibe II Plus:
well as monitor automatically displays • Programmable VPM Set Point
' vibrator you want to see). • One button to turn all vibrators on or off.
.ea
• Scan mode automatic scroll through or • Two button to speed all vibrators up or down
manually select vibrator you want to see. instantly.
• User can input slump and air entrainment. • Programmable ground speed set point for
automatic VPM slowdown and speed up.
p PRSRTSTD
U.S.POSTAGE
PAID
FR7M
IPMENTCO.,INC. BRIGHTON,CO
PERMIT NO.51
12739 Weld Count,/Road 4 4. Brighton,Colorado 80603
Phone: 303-659-3900♦ Fax: 303-659-5158
AIRY-
libt
III®�
New Meade
- KRMCA KAPA CRMCA CCA WCA NMRMCA Address Correction Requested
FOSTER EQUIPMENT, INC.
Foster Equipment Company, Inc., a supplier of construction equipment in the Rocky
Mountain Region, has provided quality and excellence to the construction industry since
1982. For most of our product lines we serve the States of Colorado, New Mexico,Wyoming,
Utah, Idaho and Montana along with parts of Nebraska and Kansas. We are a full service
dealer with New Equipment Sales, Parts, Service and Used Equipment Departments.
Neal Foster: President and Corporate Sales
neal(a�fosterequipment.com Cell Phone: 303-674-8482
Fred Beattie: Northern Territory Sales
fred(cfosterequipment.com Cell Phone: 720-320-2448
Barry Winchell: Southern Territory Sales
barry(c fosterequipment.com Cell Phone: 303-514-7724
Rob Jordan: Used Equipment Manager
rob@fosterequipment.com
Doug Hocum: Parts Manager
doug@fosterequipment.com
Linda Allen: Accounting and Office Manager
linda@fosterequipment.com II
r.„. „
,..
, ,1 aIw Nk
CONTRACTING
9 .
Section 23-2-160
Item H
Project: Foster Equipment
Re: Road Access
Attached hereto is a copy of the Weld County Road Access Information Sheet.
General Contracting • Consulting • Design/Build • Construction Management
300 Madison Avenue Loveland . Colorado 80537 • 970.669.3077 . Fax: 970.669.2183
www.kingcontracting.com email: kci@frii.com
WELD COUNTY ROAD ACCESS INFORMATION SHEET
Weld County Department of Public Works
111 H Street, P.O. Box 758, Greeley, Colorado 80632
Phone: (970)356-4000, Ext. 3750 Fax: (970)304-6497 /�
Road File#: Date: 7 _ / 7- O(o
RE#: and
y� Other Case#:
1. Applicant Name t, a D. and Sod•
1Ikh H . Foster- Phone (303)&59 " 00
Address 28)3 Cortina Lane: City Evergreen State CO Zip80+81
2. Address or Location of Access Ful I feint treeSs-na ditches or curb orgy-it-ter
Section fir) Township IN Range (b(� Subdivision Block Lot' Weld
County Road#: - Side of Road N Distance from nearest intersection I37 5 t
3. Is there an existing access to the property? Yes No #of Accesses FI )� Ft�r)
4. Proposed Use: RIB atgrl ttO�I
❑ Permanent ❑ Residential/Agricultural t�Industrial
❑ Temporary ❑ Subdivision ❑ Commercial ❑ Other
5. Site Sketch
Legend for Access Description:
AG = Agricultural
L__
RES = Residential
O&G = Oil 8 Gas
D.R. = Ditch Road •
= House
O = Shed D
A = Proposed Access—3
• =Existing Access
Ni
weld Cooniii***************************************
OFFICE USE ONLY:
Road ADT Date Accidents Date
Road ADT Date Accidents Date
Drainage Requirement Culvert Size Length
Special Conditions
❑ Installation Authorized ❑ Information Insufficient
Reviewed By: Title:
-6-
LAG
CONTRACTING
Section 23-2-160
Item I
Project: Foster Equipment
Re: Employees
Foster Equipment Company has reported that Ten (10) employees could be
associated with the proposed use and building complex. Of that total two will be
staffed within the shop building, one will supervise the shop facility and parts area
for both buildings and three will remain in the office building. Currently there are
two salespeople in the field. The remaining capacity is for planned growth.
General Contracting • Consulting • Design/Build • Construction Management
300 Madison Avenue Loveland . Colorado 80537 • 970.669.3077 • Fax: 970.669.2183
www.kingcontracting.com email: kci@frii.com
TERAll
3 a . INIGT
GQKTRAG IN
9 —
Section 23-2-160
Item J
Project: Foster Equipment
Re: Setback and Offset
Foster Equipment Company will locate the office building 20' from the adjacent
side property thus exceeding the section 23-3-250 paragraph 2. The same
applies to the shop building which will be 38' from the adjacent side property line.
The Foster equipment office building will also locate 61' from the street right of
way of County Road Four thus exceeding the section requirements of 23-3-350
paragraph 1 .
General Contracting • Consulting • Design/Build • Construction Management
300 Madison Avenue Loveland • Colorado 80537 • 970.669.3077 . Fax: 970.669.2183
www.kingcontracting.com email: kci@frii.com
- t rnIA:\ G
.... ...CONTRACTING
Section 23-2-160
Item M
Project: Foster Equipment
Re: Landscaping
Per meeting with Planning officials on September 11 , 2006, Foster Equipment
Company acknowledges 6.8% of the 4 acre parcel, approximately 11 ,775sf, shall
be landscaped per the definition of section 23-3-350 G.
This percentage is based upon the hardship on not having commercial water
available to landscape such a large area as suggested by planning regulations.
The plantings shown on the plan will be maintained by the same private well on
the property as used for potable water. The other landscape area is considered to
be dry landscape consisting of rock mulch. The public right of way area along
county road four will be maintained at 10' as also explained in the same section.
The office building parking area will be landscaped per the attached plans and
details which show buffering from County Road Four.
General Contracting • Consulting • Design/Build • Construction Management
300 Madison Avenue Loveland • Colorado 80537 • 970.669.3077 . Fax: 970.669.2183
www.kingcontracting.com email: kci@frii.com
01/12/07 12:44 FAX ¢1006
Jul. 12. 2007 12:40PM King ractinj Inc. No, 7501 P. 1
EIK11-911.
300 Madison Avenue
Loveland,Colorado 80537
(970)669-3077
(970)669-2183 Fax
kci@frii.com
TRANSMITTAL
Tat Weld County Dept. of Planning sggad Th
918 10th Street cotter
Greeley, Colorado 80631 Fed
Fed Ex
Passim:1 X
Attu:Michelle Martin Other
Transmitted For
Date:January 12,2007 Approval
Use on project
Project Foster Equipment Your Piles X
Enclosed: Dear Ms. Martin,
Enclosed are the responses that you requested pursuant to the site plan
conditions for the Foster Equipment project S,P,R-407.These responses are
pursuant to item number one section A,B,C,D,Band F.Item G is still
forthcoming.Please review and keep these in the appropriate file and if you
have any questions or concerns please feel free to contact either Foster
• Equipment or myself.
By: Randal F.King CC:Foster Equipment Company
President Attn:Neal Foster
(303)659-5158
01/12/07 14:44 FAX Q004
-
Jan. 12. 2007 12:40PM K'ingi.tracting Inc. No. 7501 P, 2
January 9,2007
•
Weld County Planning Commission
Attention: Mebane Martin
4209 CR24.5
Longmont,CO 80504
Dear Ms.Martin:
Subject Case Number SPR-407;Parcel Number; 1471 30 400103;Site Plan
Review for office building for heavy equipment sales,service warehouse
and maintenance building for heavy equipment.
This letter is in response to your request for additional information relative to the Site
Plan Review plat Our Company is involved with the sales of new and used concrete
related construction equipment. Consequently,the demand.for disposable wastes are
minimal.
Wastes Expected to be Generated on Site.
Typical wastes generated by selling and servicing heavy equipment includes cardboard,
shipping containers(sometimes reinforced by wood and disposed of in the dumpster),
engine oil(100 gallons/yr.),lubricating grease(25 lbs./yr,), batteries(12/yr),and some
general office trash that is not recycled(1.2 yard dumpster)emptied twice a month. The
engine oil,lubricating grease,batteries,and trash are picked up and properly disposed of
by our suppliers listed below.
Raptor Used Oil Recovery
4440 Navajo Court
Greeley,CO 80634
970 346-8208
Product Used Oil&Cheese
Interstate Batteries
300 Willow
Pt.Collins,CO 80524
970 484.1307
Product:Used Batteries
Waste Management of Denver
FO Box 1238
Englewood, CO 80150
303 797-1600
Product:Dumpster Waste
01/12/07 12:44 FAX - - -
-
_ _ -
¢j 009
Jan. 12. 2007 12:41PM King nt rack ing Inc. �-. No. 7501 P. 3
$eouirements of the Colorado Department of Transportation.
Access from WCR 4 to US 85 does not have a negative effect on our business. We are
aware of CDOT's US 85 Access Control Plan Which shows WCR 4 is to become a 1/4
access in an interim condition with it ultimately being closed to US 85 in the long term.
This should have minimum effect on our business;however,it could have a negative
effect on property values.
01/12/07 12:44 FAX __ _, _. I1002
Jan. 12. 2007 12:41PM Kingntracting Inc. No, 7501 P. 4
•
Weld County Planning Commission
Attention: Michelle Martin
January 9,2007
Page 2
&fjuiremcnts of the Office of the State Engineer,Division_of Water Resources.
Well No. 116824 is currently permitted for drinking and sanitary purposes only in an
individual commercial business. Our Site Plan will be revised to exclude trees,bushes
and plants.
Surface Mining,
Neal D.Foster and Judith A.Foster are the owners of the property's mineral rights.
They have no intentions of mining minerals.
Sincerely,
Foster Equipment Company,Inc.
Neal D.Foster,President
CC Randy King,Building Contractor
01/12/07 12:43 FAX _ _ LJoo1
Jan. 12. 2007 12:41PM Kini^ ntracting Inc. No. 1501 P. 5
EK!NG
11TR11�
Memo
To: Weld County Planning Services Project: Neal & Judith Foster
Attn: Michelle Martin Project Number. SPR 407
Total number of pages: 1 Re: Brighton Fire Comments
Item 1-B
1. King Contracting acknowledges that all construction drawings will be
submitted to the greater Brighton fire protective district for approval
2. The signage as requested is shown on sheets A1.1 and A3.1
3. Spray painting operations are not performed in this facility
King Contracting. Inc.
Randal F. King
President
General Contracting • Consulting • Design/Build • Construction Management
300 Madison Avenue Loveland . Colorado 80537 . 970,889,3077 . Fax: 970.869.2183
www.kingcontracting.com email: kci@frii.com
*HILTON® WALL SCONCE (Various reflectors are protected by U.S.Patent No.6A64,378.)
HOUSING—The one-piece die-formed aluminum half-cylindrical housing is designed for
downght only,uptight only,and combination uplight/cloymfight applications. Al mounting
hardware is stainless sted or ekxtro-zinc plated sled.
WALL MOUNT-A galvanized-steel universal wall mounting plate easily mounts directly to a
4"octagonal or square junction box. M EPDM gasket is supplied to be installed between .. ty:
the mounting plate and junction box,sealing the junction box from entrance of water. The
galvanized-steel universal plate allows the future to securely attach to the mounting plate
using a unique clanging design which is locked into place with two hex-head screws. The
universal plate permits the future to be mounted in the uplghting or downfightng position. . ---.
Downlight future used in uptight position is listed for damp(covered)loxatlons. _
DOOR FRAME—The aluminum pan style door frame mounts to the housing using two or Flamm fixtures
stainless steel,recessed and motive fasteners for easy access into the fixture. A one-piece meet IESNA
extruded silicone gasket seals the door frame against the housing. The door swings open .,/I4,cia lass na°non.
and is held in place by a wire retainer. (Downright Only)
LENS/GASKET—A tat dear tempered glass downright lens is sealed to the door with a one-
piece EPDM gasket The uptight lens utilizes a diffused tempered glass lens secured with o mr Ns o N s
multiple lens dips and a one-piece extruded silicone gasket M optional po>ycarbnate
dnwlight lens is available on most Compact Fluorescent fixtures.
SOCKETS—HID lamp holders are glazed porcelain,medium base for wattages up to 175 watts
and mogul base for 250 watt—both are 4KV pulse rated. The Compact Fluorescent times
Sure a one-piece thermoplastic socket #••\
nano
LIGHT SOURCES—The torture's destined to operate w th horrontal Pulse Star[Melai f♦alide, / 84'ST
•
Super Metal Heide,Metal Halide,High Pressure Sodium and single or double Compact u °
Fluorescent lamps. Lamps supplied as standard—HID(clear,shipped installed)and — (m.6) — Rte
Compact Fluorescent(coated,4100K,shipped in separate carton). 7-314•
BALLASTSAEECTRICAL COMPONENTS—Electrical components are factory-mounted in Universal Mounting Plate Top View
housing and prewred with voltage specific leads which extend from the back of the unit unmet) ameba am
trough a rubber grommet This grommet prevents the entry of insects,dust and moisture —11/15 .
into the fodre. The need to open the fixture to make wiring connections is eliminated, m7mme)
his making instlation quick and easy.UL listed HID components with high-power factor it
meown
ans
ballasts rated fir- F starling. Compact Ruorescent ballasts are Electronic Universal 4sna
Voltage(120-277V,50/60Hz)or 347V(60Hz),0°F starting. Compact Fluorescent fixtures
with UE(Universal Electronic)voltage are available with an optional dimming ballast for
multiple types of controls such as bufid'ng lighting oxntrds and occupancy sensors.Bally memmh 2a — —� Rum) .._{
back-up is available for UE voltage only.7w ilable battery back-up is voltage specific with Front View Side View
32°F rated starling temperature for Us.ppicetons for 26 watt through 70 watt lamps.
Consult factory for available wattages and voltages for use in Canada.
EMERGENCY OPERATION•A variety of integral emergency options are avalable to campy
with Life Safety Codes which require emergency fighting along the path of egress on the
bulking's exterior,so biking occupants can exit safely Integral Emergency Battery Back-
up option is available on Compact fluorescent wits. Emergency Quartz option is offered on HID units. Options for one o t o 12 volt separate circuit(s),for use with up to 35 watt
Halogen lamp(s)at available on both Compact Fluorescent and HID units.
RERECTORS/DISTRBUTION PATTERNS—Multiple reflector systems are available to deliver a
narrow,wide or wal wash pattern.
Dowdight—Forward Throw(FTM,FT),Wall Wash(WW)and Type III(3)reflectors.
Uptight—Wall Wash(WW). Uptight&Downight Combination
Up&Dowd'ght Combination—Faward Throw with 10%uptight(F1M 10,FT10),Type
III with 10%upigt(310),Forward Prow with narrow uptight(FTN),Forward Throw wiM 'HIPPING VvhIGHTs Hilton Wartscuuce
wide uptight(FTW),Type III with narrow uptight(3N),and Type III with wide uptight(3W). cam,t. Es.Nha M/a1.) simnel ii.)
rda mil c..) Has(m/t)
FINISHES—Each&lure is finished with LSI's DuraGripe polyester powder fnishing process. HIWSD-HID 11/24 616/24.25 394/15.5 343/13
The DuraGrip fnish withstands extreme loather changes without cracking or peeing and HIWSD-CFL 8/17 616/24.25 394/15.5 343/13
is guaranteed kr fNe hi years. Standard colors include bronze,black pbtinum plus,buff, HIWSU-HID 10/22 618/24.25 394/15.5 343/13
white,satin verde green,metaNc saver,and graphite. HMIS-HID 11/24 618/24.25 394/15.5 343/13
HIWS-CFL 8/17 616/24.25 394/155 343/13
DECAL STRIPING—LSI offers optional color-coordinated decals in 9 sandard colors to accent
the fixture. Deals are guaranteed for 5 years against peeing,cracking or Axing.
PHOTOMETRICS—Please visit our web site at www.blinhkarietcont for detailed
photometric nab. lyaya
a Q I'+a6M W�Omsor4)lout
oat location
Prated Name h Faire Type I ®2007
LSI INDUSTRIES INC.
Ao.avr•Sart-Kelm. CON e
HILTON® WALL SCONCE
LUMINAIRE ORDERING INFORMATION
[cremate La tie I. Leninaire
Prefix Distribution Vial a E Light Source Lens Vol e. Finish
HIWSDI 3-Type 3 Wide 50 PSMH-Pulse-Start Metal Halide 250 Watt F-Flat Clear 120 BRZ-Bronze
(Downlight) FT-Forward Throw 70 SMH-Super Metal Halide 250 Watt Tempered Glass 208 BLK-Black
WW-Wall Wash 100 MH-Metal Halide
150 50,70,1003,150,175,250 Watt 240 WHT-White
175 HPS-High Pressure Sodium 277 BUFPLP-Platinum uff Plus
347 BUG-Ratf
250 2 50,70,100,150 Watt 480 SVG-Satin Verde
FTM-Forward Throw 26 CFL-Compact Fluorescent F-Flat Clear LIE-Universal Electronic Green
Medium 32 Single 26,32,42,57,70 Waft Tempered Glass (120v-277v 50/60Hz) GPT-Graphite
42 CFL2-Compact Fluorescent MSV-Metallic Silver
57 Double 26,32,42 Watt FPC-Flat Clear 347 (60Hz)6
WW-WaH Wash 70 CFL-Compact Fluorescent Polycarbonate
Single 26,32,42 Watt
HIWSU WW-Wall Wash 50 MH-Metal Halide 120
(Uplight) 70 50,70,1003,150,175,Watt F-Flat Diffused 208
Wet 100 HPS-High Pressure Sodium Tempered Glass 240
Location 150 50,70,100,150 Watt Y77
Listed 175 347
....._- _.— 480 ._
26 CFL--Compact Fluorescent UE-Universal Electronic
32 Single 26,32,42 Watt (120v-277v 50/60Hz)
42 347 (An-1716
HIWS 310 -Type 3,10%Up 50 PSMH-Pulse-Start Metal Halide 250 Watt 120
(Uplight FT10 -Type FT,10%Up 70 SMH-Super Metal Halide 250 Watt F-Flat Clear 208
and 3N-Type 3,Narrow Up 100 MH-Metal Halide Tempered Glass 240
Downlight 3W-Type 3,Wide Up 150 50,70,1003,150,175,250 Watt 277
Combo.) FTN-Forward Throw,Narrow Up 175 HPS-High Pressure Sodium 347
FTW-Forward Throw,Wide Up 250 2 50,70,100.150 Watt 480
FTM10-Forward Throw 26 CFL-Compact Fluorescent F-Flat Clear UE-Universal Electronic
Medium,10%Up 32 Single 26,32,42,57,70 Watt Tempered Glass (120v-277v 50/60Hz)
42 CFL2-Compact Fluorescent FPC-Flat Clear
57 Double 26,32,42 Watt Polycarbonate4 347 (60Hz)6
70
1
I I I
HIWS 310 175 MH F 120 BRZ 45 Siphons
PC1120-Button-Type Photocell
EXAMPLE OF A TYPICAL ORDER PC1208-Button-Tyype Photocell
PCI240-Button-Type Photocell
PC1277-Button-Type Photocell
PC1347-Button-Type Photocell
TP-Tamper Proof
PMA-Pole Mott Adaptor for use with square poles
PMAR-Pole Mount Adaptor for use with rood poles
DIM- CFL Control Voltage Dimming Ballast°
C-Coated MH or PSMH Lamp
SOT-Standby Quart(Time Delayle-1°
f D OI N Ol E S SON-Standby Quartz(Non-Time Delay)tle
1- Listed for wet locations(Downlight Only) Listed for damp locations If used for uptight(in covered locations only). B ED-Emergency Quartz(S- On erg Back-up'
circuit-HID only)1°
2- 250 watt available with Forward Throw or Forward Throw Combo distribution only. EM - Eme
rgency One 12V Circuit Provision with
3- Supplied with an HX-HPf transformer as standard. Also available with a 120/277 volt CWA transformer. Consult 35 Watt Halogen Lamp12
factory. EMI IL-One Emergency 12V Circuit Provision
4- FPC lens available on Downlight feature only -Less Halogen Lampt2
5- For International voltages,consult factory, EM2-Two Emergency 12V Circuit Provisions
with(2)35 Watt Halogen Lamps12
6- 347 volt CFL is not available with dimming ballast(DIM)option. Consult factory for battery back-up(BB)option. EM2LL-Two Emergency 12y Circuit Provisions
7- Tamper-proof ScrewdrIer mist be ordered separately. See Accessories. -Less Halogen Lamps1
8- CFL Dimming Control by others. LL-Less Lamp
Color Den Lamp
9- SOT or SON available on 100 Watt minimum HID fixtures. 45-Light Gold Metallic
10-Fixtures shipped with 100 Watt,120 volt quartz lamp. 20-Charcoal Metallic 55—Black
11-Battery Back-up available on single and double voltage specific units. On double units,one lamp will be energized by 94-Blue Metallic 50—White
battery back-up(BB)option. Consult factory for specific Means of Egress lob application compliance. 59-Dark Green 51—Dark Red
12-Utilizes GY6.35 socket(s). 12 volt separate circuit(s)required. 21 -Tomato Red 700—Aztec Silver Metallic
ACCESSORY ORDERING INFORMATION -
DesalpYss Mr NSmir Dosaiplbn WS Mother
FK120-Single Fusing FK120' PS-PoNcarbonate Shield 205254"
FK277-Single Fusing FK27T _ _SW -Surface Wiring Box — 17315681K
DFK208.240-Double Fusing DFK208.240' SCD -Tamper-proof Screwdriver 36449
FK347-Single Fusing FK347+ _ Mvaaabe on HID radon only. Fusing to be installed in a wmpatibk junction box suppled b/wntractor
-Double Fusing
K % DFK480T 1e Available on downlghtneure only
NOW Nome I Fixture Type I 02007
Awn sy s�trra� Catalog i LSI INDUSTRIES INC.
OF II
HOUSING-OFII housing is one-piece,die-cast aluminum ensuring weather-tight
construction.
DOOR FRAMES-The one-piece die-cast aluminum lens frame is hinged and
secured to the housing with four captive screws.
LENS/GASKET-OFII has one-piece,high impact,flat dear tempered glass lens. ,' ` ..
The lens frame features a continuous silicone gasket for ma>amum sing to the
housing. •Celth" * .'
SOCKETS-Porcelain mogul-base sockets feature nickel-plated lamp grip screw
shell.
•
LIGHT SOURCES-Pulse-Start Metal Halide,Metal Halide or High Pressure
Sodium. Clear lamp is supplied as standard.
(Shown wr F optional Yoke Mount)
BALLASTS-CWA high-power factor type ballast.All ballast types are designed for
-20°operation.
REFLECTORS/DISTRIBUTION PATTERNS-MI OFII fixtures are available DIMENSIONS
with a precision-formed anodized aluminum wide beam reflector for optimum
photometric performance. Photometric data is tested in accordance with IESNA 23" 10"
guidelines. (584mm) (254mm)
MOUNTING-Mounting arm accepts 2-3/8"0.D.x 4-3/4"minimum tenon.
Medium Ibdure is avahlale with optional yoke mount
FINISH-Each OFII fixture features a powder coated baked-on bronze,black, 23"
platinum plus,or white enamel finish. (584mm)
PHOTOMETRICS-Please visit our web site at www.ksi-ndustries.egm for
detailed photometric data.
0FL2-E.P.A.-3.8
16' 6.75"
(406mm) (171mm)
7
16'
(406mm)
OFtM2-E.P.A.-1.9
SHIPPING WEIGHTS OF II
Catalog Naar aright(41ea) Length(man)WIRY(■fl)S (n4
OFM2 15/34 610/24 464/18.25 2410.5
OFL2 32/70 635/25 635/25 305/12
Aft. Mild Nam I Fain Type h 02007
LSI INDUSTRIES INC.
40...,...•s..C,ri.. away a I
OF II
LUMINAIRE ORDERING INFORMATION
lnNeter Dislnbnlion Lamp LinLight Source Lens Voltage Lu finish e
Preto Walla e q 9
OFM2- WB—Wide Beam 150 PSMV—Pulse-Start Metal Halide F—Flat Clear 480 BRZ-Bronze
Medium 175 320 Watt Tempered Glass MT—Multi Ta 1 BLK-Black
250 MH—Metal Halide TT-Tri-Tapz PLP-Platinum Plus
320 175,250,400 Watt 1A/HT-White
400 HPS—High Pressure Sodium
150,250,400 Watt
OFL2— WB—Wide Beam 1000 MH—Metal Halide
Large 1000 Watt
ICJ I I
0FM2 WB 400 MH F 480 BRZ PCRPC
EXAMPLE OF A TYPICAL ORDER
PCRPC—Photoelectric Control
with Twist lock Receptacle3
YK—Yoke Mount'
FOOTNOTES:
1- MT—Multi Tap consists of 120V,208V,240V,and 277V. Multi Tap is pre-wired for highest voltage. Alternate voltages will require field re-wiring.
2- TT—Tri-Tap is shipped standard for Canadian applications. Tri-Tap consists of 120V,277V,and 347V. Tri-Tap is pre-wired for highest voltage. Alternate voltages will require field
re-wiring.
3-Specify line voltage.
4-Available on OFM2 Medium only.
ACCESSORY ORDERING INFORMATION -
Snaila Da Number Dewipdea Order Rimier
OF1v2-GS Glare Shield 159227(BRZ) FK277-Single Fusing FK277
OFM2-GS Glare Shield 179146(BLK) DFK208.240-Double Fusing DFK208,240
0FM2-VS Vandal Shield 159229 DFK480-Double Fusing DFK480
0FL2-GS Glare Shield 1737110 _ FK347-Single Fusing FK347
FK120-Single Fusing FK120
•
ni ,
Glare Shield Vandal Shield
Pmj.et Name I Fialure Type I ®2007
LSI INDUSTRIES INC.
.u+.so.S...rmo.. Calaldg I I
FLOOD LIGHTING BRACKETS
TENON BRACKETS
BKS-PTB-2 1T BKS-PTB-3 11T BKS-PTB330 BKS-PTB-4
1T '( 32mm) (432mm) 30"(762mm) 1T 1T
(432mm) (432mm) I (432mm) (432mm)
r
(51rm1 r (76 m n r
PPEE (51mmm1 r (51Fia�
PIPE (51mm1
BKS-PTB-3-120 1T BKS-PTB-12 BKS
EE-PTB-13 BKS-PTB-1330
1T (432mm)
(432mm) I I 24' (762mm) I
46' (610mm) '
�2a 1219mm)
(51mm)
PE �—iv
BKS-P1B-14 BKS-PTB-15
2�610mm)� 2P
(610mm) JI
r
BOLI ON RHACKE IS
BKS-FB0-5 43/4' BKS-FB0-1S 161? BKS-FBO-30 30"
(121mm) (470mm)--1 (762mm)"
i .
J
f/ •
LP-'
ROOD BRACKET ORDERING INFORMATION
ftraeket RiarL?I trnckel tracker
Des iyralmn Type Conb9uralion flesh Options EPA
TENON MOUNT PTB1 2 BRZ—Bronze None 1.6
BKS—Bracket Steel 3 BLK—Black 2.1
3-30 PLP—Platinum Plus 2.4
4 BUF—Buff P3
WHT—White
3-120 SVG—Satin Verde12 2.0
13 Green 1.8
1.8
GPT—Graphite
I 13-30 MSV-Metallic Silver 2.1
14 2.5
15 3.3
BOLT-ON FB02 5 .1
BKS—Bracket Steel 18 .6
I 30 1.0
J I NOTE:Standad slip-fitter fits 2-3/8'0.L3 tenon(2.0 pipe tenon)
I I
BKS - FBO - 5 - BRZ- 1- PTB brackets sllpm 2-3/8"O.0.tenon.
2- F80 brackets require pole preparation and must be ordered with"SF"or"DP pole option.
EXAMPLE OF A TYPICAL ORDER 3- The bracket EPA should be added to the fixture EPA when selecting the proper pole.
SHIPPING WEIGHTS Flood Brackets
CalNog Number Ed.Weight(kglbe.) Catalog Number &I.Waigbt(kg'IS.) _ Catalog Member EsI Weight(twAha.)
BKS-PTB-2 11/24 --- BKS-PTB-12 9/28 BKS-PTB-15 21/47 ._
BKS-PTB-3 15/32 BKS-PTB-13 13/32 BKS-FBO-5 2/5
--- -__ _ - - - _..._...._..._.__._._.____
BKS-PTB-3-30 13/29 BKS-PTB-13-30 15/38 BKS-FBO-18 8/14
.............._ ---
BKS-PTB-4 18/40 BKS-PTB-14 17/19 8KS-FBO-30 13/29
BKS-PTB-3-120 15/32
kr
Project Name I Fixture Type I 02007
L5I INDUSTRIES INC.
Amvo..rwa S..oae.a.. Caialeg t I
STEEL SQUARE POLES
POLE SHAFT-Pole shaft is electro-welded ASTM-A500 Grade C steel tubing with a minimum DIMENSIONS
yield strength of 50,000 psi.On Tenon Mount steel poles,tenon is 2-38"O.D.high-strength pipe.Tenon is 4-3/4"in length.Straight poles are 4",5",and 6"square. SON—
Soso—
2-3Ilr(60mm)O.D.x 4-3/4"(121mm) Boll-Oe Mould
HAND-HOLE-Standard hand-hole location is 12"above pole base.Poles 22'and above have a Tenon 2-Bon Patters
3"x 6"reinforced hand-We. Shorter poles have a 2"x 4"non-reinforced hand-hole.
BASE-Pole base is ASTM-A36 hot-rolled steel plate with a minimum yield strength of 36,()00
psi.Two-piece square base cover Is optimal.
ANCHOR BOLTS-Poles are furnished with anchor bolts featuring mint-plated double nuts and ,
washers.Galvanized anchor bolts are optbunl.Anchor bolts conform to ASTM-A36 with a
minimum yield strength of 36,000 psi. SOP-
14'-39' Square Pelt Top
GROUND LUG-Ground lug is standard. (4.3m-11.9m)
DUPLEX RECEPTACLE-Weatherproof duplex receptacle is optional. g
GROUND FAULT CIRCUIT INTERRUPTER-Ground fault circuit interrupter is optional. Hand-hole
FINISHES-Each pole is finished with LSI's DuraGripa baked-on polyester-powder finishing sot-
process to give the pole an exceptionally attractive appearance.The process electrostatically No Mating Holes
applies and thermally fuses a polyester powder to the pole.This unique protection process M I — 1
provides an extremely smooth and uniform fetish which withstands extreme weather changes It
without cracking or peeling.DuraGrip finish features a two-year limited warranty.Standard Optimal radar
finish colors available for poles are bronze,Wait platinum plus,buff,white,satin Verde green, love
/ill
metallic silver,and graphite. Optional DuraGrip Plus features added protection with a 3.0 to 5.0 mil ihleWheSs of polyester-powder finish plus an inner coaling.This specially developed I e. SF-
inner waling is a thermal plastic hydrocarbon resin applied to the Inside of the pole to seal Pole Preparation
and protect against atmospheric and corrosive matter.DuraGrip Plus finish features a five- Prolestioa �)
year limited .,.warranty. rr. ehm
Both
DETERMINING THE LUMINAIRE/POLE COMBINATION FOR YOUR APPLICATION: Cl
•Select haninaire from Luminaire Ordering Information. a 1, Fonadatioe
•Select bracket configuration. eon.
•Refer to Lunlretre EPA Chart to determine EPA value.
•Select Height of pole.
•Select MPH to match the wind speed in the application area.(Windspeed Map located in DRILLING L O CA t I O N S
Appendix) Side"C"
•Confirm the pole EPA that is equal to or exceeds the luminaire/bracket EPA as was ri, - ;
previously determined.
POLE SEL[CTIOI CHAR!'. 4"(102unnl.5"1117mm1 and 6'11a2nnin steel square'Ales
Side"D"\1J2
—Side"B"
Height EPA's. 0utside Material Bolt
70 MPH 180 MPH 190 MPH'100 MPH Dimensions Circle
14 (4.3m) 233 ' 16.7 ' 12.2 . 90 4'(102mm) 5116 B
16'(4.9m) 18.6 13.1 9.3 6.5 14"(102mm) 5116 B
16 (49m) 34.6 250 18.5 13.8 5"127mm) S11G C I
18 (5.5m) 14.4 9.7 65 4.2 4 f102mm) 5116 B Side"A"(Had-Mole Side)
18'(5 5m) 27.9 19.7 14,1 10 t 5'/127mm1 S116 C
20'(61m) 110 7.0 42 - 22 4'(102mm) 6116 B Side: A B C D
20'(6,1m1 18 7 12 8 8 8 5 9 ' 4"1102mm) SO7G B Hand-hole_- _._—_.X I-- -_
20'(6.1m) 225 154 105 70 5'(127mm) 5116 C Single.
20-(6.1m1 35.5 ` 254 184 ' 134 5'1127mm) 5076 D D7 Roo X x
22'16 7m) 10.4 6.3 ! 3.4 1.4 4"(102mm) S116 B nq0° ___X_22'(67m) 187 126 I 84 54 4'1102mm) 5076 B T00° __- -_ X
22'(6.7m) 20.8 13.8 8.9 5.5 5'(127mm) S116 C ' X
22'(8.7m) 34 0 23.9 I 17.0 . 12 0 5' TNi20°
(127mm) S076 0 Jul2 X y X x
24' 3m) 7.1 I 4.0 I 1.5 - 4'1102mm) 6116 B
24'V3m) 15.1 9.7 6.0 33 4 (102mm) 51,1/6 8 Single FRO -._X
24'(73m) 167 105 L _6.2 1 3,1 _ Sr(127mm) S116 C Double FRO , X I X.
24'(7.3m) 28.6 196 13.4 I 69 5'(127mm) SO7G 0 I*Other two locations will be 120°to the left and noht of Side A.
24'(73m) 462 i 326 . 232 • 166 6(153mm) S07G J Hole:Consult factory for custom variations.Standard SF and DF pole preparations are
26'(7,9m1 5 3 2 1 ' — — 4"1102mm) 5116 B located 3/4 of the Imipht of the pole from the base,unless otherwise specified.
26'(7.910) 12.0 1 72 39 15 4"(102mm) 5070 B
26'(79m) 13.2 7.6 I 3.8 ' 1-0 5'(127mm) S11G C SHIPPING WEIGHTS-Steel Square Poles
26'(7 9m1 24 0 t 15 8 103 61 5"1127mm) 5076 D 4"(102mm)sq.11 Ga.is approximately 7.50 Ibs./fl.
28'(7.9m) 39.6 9 12.5 17.5 12.9 6'(152mm) 5076 J 4"(102mm)sq.Ga.is approximately 10.00 lbs/ft. _
28'(8.5m) 339 12.5 7.5 99 6'(152mm) 5076 D 5" 127mm s Ga_isa approximately 9.00 lbs./ft.
38 91m) 16.3 29.6 1 15.1 97 6'( 11mm) SO/b J �__ _)_q pP Y
30 (9.tm) 16.3 9.6 � 5.0 1 7 5"(11/mm) 50/6 D 5"(127mm)sq.Ga,is approximately 12.50 Ibs./A.
30'(9.1m) 28 8 y 18.5 I 116 6 6 6"152mm) S076 J 6"(152mm)sq.Ga is approximately 15.40 Ibs/h.
35'(10.7m) 183 10.0 I 4.3 — 6"(152mm) 5076 J _Anchor Bolts(3/4"x 30")(19mm x 762mm) IS lbs.(7kq)/set
39'(11.9m) 11.5 F 4 3 — — 6'(152mm) S07G J Anchor Bolts(1"x 36")(25mm x 914mm) 30 Ibs.(14kg)/set
P"Refer to EPA ialoaeliee on neat page.
II luminaire weight weeds 250 Ihs.(113.#g),consult factory
For,ppl'ampons in Florida m Canada,consult factory
Piffled Name i Fixture Type I L O2O07
INDUSTRIES INC.
ACbsPa ,.na S-.cK•d•„ Catalog It I
STEEL SQUARE POLES
ORDERING INFORMATION
P Material Height' Mounting Pole Finish Dplions
Serierie s Con Iiguralion
Square pole for S11G-11 Ga.Steel 14' S—Single/Parallel BRZ-Bronze GA—Galvanized Anchor Bolts
Bolt-on mount I SO7G-07 Ga.Steel 16' D180°—Double BLK-Black SF-Single Flood3
2-Bolt Pattern 18' D90°-Double PLP-Platinum Plus DF-Double Flood3
4SQBO l 20' DN90°-Double BUF-Buff DGP-DuraGnp®Plus
6S0B0 22' T90°-Triple WHT-White LAB-Less Anchor Bolts
24' TN120°-Triple SVG-Satin Verde
26' 090°-Quad Green
28' QN90°-Quad GPT-Graphite
30' MSV-Metallic Silver
Square Pole for 35 PT—Pole Top Mount
Pole Top Mould 39'
4SOP
5SQP Standard SF and DF pole preparations
6S0P are located 3/4 of the height of the pole
Square Pole for N—Tenon Mount from the base,unless otherwise specified
Tenon Mount Consult Pole Selection (Standard tenon
4SQN Chart on opposite page size is 2-3/8'O.D.)
5SQN
6S0N
Square Pole I-For usg with Internal
(No mounting holes Slip-Fitte(
No pole top caps)
4S01
5SQI '
1 I I
I5SOBO S07G 24 D180 PLP SF DGP FOOTNOTES.
1- Pole Heights will have.1-1/2'tolerance
EXAMPLE OF A TYPICAL ORDER 2- See Area Lighting Brackets Section.
3-See Flood Lighting Brackets Section.
ACCESSORY ORDERING INFORMATION BOLT CIRCLE
oesertpnee order Meier 4 (102mm)square r(127mm)square S(127mm)square r(152mm)square
4BC-4"Sguare Base Cover 122559CLR tam(2samml w. 1a11t(257man)ate. 10-1T(257mm)ee. Ir(agsmm)ee.
5BC—5'Square Base Cover 122561CLR -' ���I
_ 6BC-6'Square Base Cover 122563CLR CC .:._71 C yy
ER2—Wealhemroof Duplex Receptacle 122586CLR �l 1
GFI—Ground Fault Circuit Interrupter 122567CLR ll.(m,.)aa Id tide trltn..l)mma.eaa title 11'117km)ma.lea Crde ���� '
MHP—Mouakq Hale Plugs(3 plugs) 132336 Irian..lma.Mk G.te
_Vibration Damper-4'Square Pole 172539
Vibration Damper-5'Square Pole .1Z253R B C D J
Vibration Damper-6'Square Pole 178361 Slotted Slotted Slotted Slotted
Bolt Circle 8%11(203mm-279mm) 9"-1V(229mm-279mm) 9"-11'(229mm-279mm) 12'(305mm)
Anchor Bolt 3/4'x30' 314"x30' 1"x36" 1'x36'
Six (19mm x 762mm) (19mm x 762mm) (25mm x 914mm) (25mm x 914mm)
Anchor Bolt 3-1/4" 3-1/4' 4° 4"
Pro)ection (83mm) (83mm) (102mm) (102mm)
Base Plate Opening 3-516" 4-3/4' 4-5/6" 5-5/8'
for Wreaay Entry (92mm) (121mm) (117mm) (143mm)
Base Plate 10-1/8"sq.x 3/4'thk. 10-1/8'sq.x3/4"thk. 10-1/8"sq.x1"thk. 1Ysq x 1-1/8'thk,
Dimensions (257mm x 19mm) (257mm x 19mm) (257mm x 25mm) (305mm x 29mm)
Note:Base plate illustrations may change without notice.Do not use for setting anchor bons.
Consun factory for the base plate tenphtes.
EPA INFORMATION
All LSI Lighting Systems'poles are guaranteed to meet the EPA requirements listed.LSI Lighting Systems is not responsible if a pole order has a lower EPA rating
than the indicated wind-loading zone where the pole will be located.
CAUTION:This guarantee does not apply if the pole/brackeVTature combination is used to support any other items such as flags,pennants,or signs,which would
add stress to the pole.LSI Lighting Systems cannot accept responsibility for harm or damage caused in these situations.
NOTE: Pole calculations include a 1.3 gust factor over steady wind velocity.Example:poles designed to withstand 80 MPH steady wind will withstand gusts to 164
MPH.EPAs are for locations 100 miles away from hurricane ocean lines.Consult LSI for other areas. Note:Hurricane ocean lines are the Atlantic and Gulf of Mexico
coastal areas.For applications in Florida or Canada,consult factory.kr. Project Name I Future Type I 0 200
LSI INDUSTRIES INC.
A m�4re Sass. WAIN► I
r firigrn.n.
'_.aC0NTRAC-TING
9/40-
Section 23-2-160
Item O
Project: Foster Equipment
Re: Parking
Foster Equipment Company has allowed us to design the off-street parking
adjacent to the proposed building so that it meets the location requirements as
addressed in section 23-4-20. The architectural design has taken into
consideration all of section 23-4-30 as well as 23-4-40. The attached plan shows
in detail all of our off-street parking and the associated items necessary to meet
the supplementary regulations as explained in article 4.
General Contracting • Consulting • Design/Build • Construction Management
300 Madison Avenue Loveland • Colorado 80537 • 970.669.3077 • Fax: 970.669.2183
www.kingcontracting.com email: kci@frii.com
i - r fir I \ r ',
.. CONTRACTING;
9n-
Section 23-2-160
Item P
Project: Foster Equipment
Re: Loading
The loading and service areas for Foster Equipment will be located behind the
screened fenced area that surrounds the office area. Primarily the loading and
loading area will take place directly adjacent to the north of the maintenance shop
so that the materials can either be put into storage within the open yard or taken
directly into the building for service, assembly or maintenance. The area adjacent
to that yard and maintenance shop is approximately 75 feet in width and 150 feet
in length which far exceeds the requirements in 23-4-50. In addition, the entire lot
area outside the storage and maintenance building is pre-existing recycled
asphalt; thus, satisfying the requirements of 23-4-50 item C.
General Contracting • Consulting • Design/Build • Construction Management
300 Madison Avenue Loveland • Colorado 80537 . 970.669.3077 • Fax: 970.669.2183
www.kingcontracting.com email: kci@frii.com
IN
CONTRACTING
9110.
Section 23-2-160
Item R
Project: Foster Equipment
Re: Accesses
The site due to its size and frontage on County Road 4 shall have three accesses.
The first will service the fenced and screened yard area of the facility and shall be
30 feet in width and constructed of recycled asphalt so as to meet the
requirements of the code. The second driveway will be concrete paved and will be
maintained at 24 feet in width to allow for two-way traffic. That second driveway
will be an alternate route to go directly to the office and shop buildings. The third
access will come off of the other end of the concrete paved parking lot to allow the
second exit off of the parking lot to be able to disburse traffic in a uniform method.
This exit is also 24 feet in width and concrete paved all the way to County Road
24. Since this area and lot does not have drainage ditches anywhere on County
Road 4 the requirements for culvert and drainage structures are not going to be
used on this project.
The attached engineering report from Laube Engineering, will detail how we meet
or exceed the minimum standards as required by Department of Public Works.
General Contracting • Consulting • Design/Build • Construction Management
300 Madison Avenue Loveland • Colorado 80537 • 970.669.3077 . Fax: 970.669.2183
www.kingcontracting.com email: kci@frii.com
SKIN°
CONTRACTING
900
Section 23-2-160
Item T
Project: Foster Equipment
Re: Trash
Foster Equipment will maintain one two-yard dumpster behind the fenced area
that separates the office building from the yard. The dumpster will be will below
the top of the screened fencing and will be maintained on a weekly basis.
General Contracting • Consulting • Design/Build • Construction Management
300 Madison Avenue Loveland • Colorado 80537 • 970.669.3077 • Fax: 970.669.2183
www.kingcontracting.com email: kci@frii.com
IWO
., ,. CONTRACTING
Section 23-2-160
Item U
Project: Foster Equipment
Re: Use statement
Foster Equipment Company recognizes the existing and potential future
development around this site. The operations of Foster Equipment Company are
self-contained within the structures and consist of little or no activity that would be
disruptive to neighbors or neighboring uses.
1 . Noise — Facility use is in conformance with Colorado statutes regarding
transmission.
2. Air quality — This facility's use does not generate any concern of air pollution;
thus, we maintain that the air quality standards by Colorado statutes.
3. Water quality — The operations of Foster Equipment does not use water as a
part of our process; therefore, the water quality is in accordance with Colorado
statutes.
4. Radiation and radio active materials — These processes do not apply to Foster
Equipment.
5. Heat — The operations of Foster Equipment does not generate heat; therefore, it
is within Colorado statutes.
6. Glare — All lighting used will be directed in such a manner as to prohibit off-site
light and glare to any adjacent properties or public right of ways.
7. Property Maintenance — Foster Equipment Company will maintain the property
as required per Weld County statutes.
General Contracting • Consulting • Design/Build • Construction Management
300 Madison Avenue Loveland • Colorado 80537 . 970.669.3077 • Fax: 970.669.2183
www.kingcontracting.com email: kci@frii.com
1
t
- 4 . acra IN
„e CONTRACTING
9,40
Section 23-2-160
Item X
Project: Foster Equipment
Re: Tax Verification Statement
Foster Equipment Company recognizes and verifies all real estate taxes have been paid for this
property.
General Contracting • Consulting • Design/Build • Construction Management
300 Madison Avenue Loveland . Colorado 80537 • 970.669.3077 • Fax: 970.669.2183
www.kingcontracting.com email: kci@frii.com
Identify Results ^ http://maps2.merrick.com/Website/Weld/setSgl.asp?cmd=QUERY...
r^•
Land Details
Account#: R2827804 Parcel#: 147130400103
Owners Name &Address: Property Address:
FOSTER NEAL D & Street:
2813 CORTINA LN City:
EVERGREEN, CO 80439
Land Type Abst Code Unit of Measure # of Units
Agricultural 4117 Acres 0
Acres Sauare Ft. Frontage Ft.
4 174240 0
1 of 1 10/3/2006 9:01 AM
Identify Results . http://maps2.mern J om/Website/Weld/setSgl.asp?cmd=QUERY...
Parcel Valuation
Account#: R2827804 Parcel#: 147130400103
Owners Name &Address: Property Address:
FOSTER NEAL D & Street:
2813 CORTINA LN City:
EVERGREEN, CO 80439
Business/Complex:
Legal Description
PT SE4 30-1-66 LOT A AMD CORR REC EXEMPT RE-470
Land Value $1,823 Land Assessed Value $530
Impr. Value $2 Impr. Assessed Value $0
Total Value $1,823 Total Assessed Value $530
Total Taxes: $39.04 Amount Due: $0.00
Tax Area: Bordering County:
Township Range Section Ouart. Sec. Subdivison Name Block# Lot#
01 - 66 - 30 - 4 - -
Land Subtotal: Acres:4
Sale Price Sale Date Deed Type Reception #
$225,200 4/10/2006 WD 3379575
1 of 1 10/3/2006 9:01 AM
Identify Results http://maps2.mcrrick.Rm/Website/Wetd/setSgl.asp?cmd=getparcel&a...
Parcel Summary
Parcel#: 147130400103
Owner: FOSTER NEAL D &
Address: 2813 CORTINA LN
City: EVERGREEN
State: CO
Zip Code:80439
Detail Information:
IMES LANG BUILDING
=Zan OMENS
Tax Summary
Account# R2827804
Total Taxes: $39.04
Amount Due: $0.00
Mill Levy: 73.677
Tax Year: 2005
Current taxes and mill levy are year 2005 which are payable in 2006.Tax deadline for the full payment is April 30. Payment after this date will incur interest.
Adjustments to Total Taxes Due,such as Senior Citizen's Exemption, Special Improvement districts,Declaration Penalty, TO 1000 Penalty or prior years'
delinquent taxes are not included.
Treasurer's Office
1 of 1 10/3/2006 8:58 AM
10/03/06 09:07:10 AM
Weld County,Colorado-Mozillo Firefox 1- ���
Eb Edt Yew S10 tookn:arks look bell) :Q
4 • - u�.:' kt•:JJ •s2 mernckc mJwe•5deJwd•JNewer.km7Thle=We•/2r y%2CNe2r .. ..
.i ,-s rr
...i.-7,,,,, l'iTA(.T �rCLr VInHC
Parcel Summary t r
-� '__._ _—`_ _.__... u Layers
Parcel*:147130400103 I
Owner: FOSTER NEAL D& _ � I� ry;aF
Address:2813 CORTINA LN { or t•;n. ar•G0x�ms
City, EVERGREEN i 4 Fa
Stab: CO .y
Zip Code:80439 x iQ ® iU LF.�arlamx Id I I 1 r n:- • r r- : I
E 4 c: :ar ir-•d:
It �„, u .rt-,Limit
ecn rz rq nc3L ( F° q, ® Ve
I
Tax Summ "' ~fr
Account* R2827804 4 'yf.r'1 — - _ ® TR Dr na
pbl lazes: $39.04
Amount Due: fD.DD Jd I .4 t ® rr,t r� III Fh FleaI
KU levy: 73.677 ;s
ax Year: 2003 _.}fS<i PJ rer + rn ii ..ee.i
Gond fares aS i ware wx7005Nwh are payableb2006Ter
• aoline brrie NIpaseetesAOF30 Pareentalrrio dab v kraut � r i ;,,Refresh M-•..
ret 4e{efrerbb TobiT Doe such asardorUapri&iaspbzt r r
SpedNlapWarearirtr DedanE ye onha TD nay t000Peoryrior 2
4
. ars'debpuNMannotadWrtl. 1 : wi4
Treasurers Office J
Zenon and bond 63': 120&' et jfl0 :j8 Ela •.. Zoom In
§fMERRICK
StdK F -r.er ec,�I =„ _ : ,,zed County,Lolwo.., < . 9.07 Art
IN
IN r CONTRACT1HG
Section 23-2-160
Item N
Project: Foster Equipment
Re: Stormwater Runoff
Attached hereto is a copy of the Report from Laube Engineering.
General Contracting • Consulting • Design/Build • Construction Management
300 Madison Avenue Loveland . Colorado 80537 . 970.669.3077 . Fax: 970.669.2183
www.kingcontracting.com email: kci@frii.com
LAUBE 6250 W 10th Street, Ste 3
/'r Greeley,CO 80634-8856
ENGINEERING, LLC e-mail: Iaubeeng@gwest.net
Fax: (970) 356-3143
Telephone: (970)356-3099
October 12, 2006 Project No.: 327
Randy King
King Contracting, Inc.
300 Madison Avenue
Loveland, CO 80537
Subject: Drainage Report for Foster Equipment Company, Inc. Facility
Property located directly east of 12739 WCR 4
Brighton, Colorado
Dear Randy:
This submittal is a drainage study for the proposed development. A variance to Weld County
Code Chapter 24-7-130 will be required because a stormwater retention pond (release by
infiltration into the subgrade soils) has been designed instead of a detention pond (release to an
existing drainage system).
It has been a pleasure being part of your project. If you have any questions, please call me at
(970) 356-3099.
Sincerely,
LAUBE ENGINEERING, LLC 4
Keith A. Laube, P.E.
Civil Engineer
Drainage Report for
Foster Equipment Company. Inc. Facility
Property Located Directly East of 12739 WCR 4
Brighton, Colorado
Prepared For:
King Contracting, Inc
300 Madison Avenue
Loveland, CO 80537
Prepared By:
Laube Engineering, LLC
6250 W 10th Street, Ste 3
Greeley, CO 80634
(970) 356-3099
Project No. 327
October 12, 2006
Table of Contents
Engineer Certification
General Location and Description 1
Site Location 1
Project Description 1
Drainage Basin and Site Design Information 1
Drainage Basin 1
Site Drainage 1
Adjacent Site Drainage Conditions 1
Site Flood Hazard 1
Soil and Groundwater Conditions 2
Drainage Design Criteria 2
Storm Drainage Criteria 2
Development Criteria References and Constraints 2
Hydrological Criteria 2
Hydraulic Criteria 2
Drainage Facility Design 2
General Concept 2
Specific Details 3
Erosion Control 3
Conclusions 3
Appendix A—Runoff and Detention Volume Calculations 4
ENCLOSURES 11" x 17" Drainage, Grading and Erosion Control Plan
Laube Engineering, LLC
Drainage Report
Foster Equipment Company, Inc.
New Office/Shop Building
Page i
Engineer Certification
I hereby certify that this report for the drainage design for the Foster Equipment Company, Inc.
property located directly east of 12739 Weld County Road 4, Brighton, Colorado was prepared
by me (or under my direct supervision) in accordance with the provisions of the Weld County
Storm Drainage Criteria for the owners thereof.
R
. R'
31874 '
. -o
to i1.4•../
t
�NAI \
Keith A. Laube, P.E.
Registered Professional Engineer
State of Colorado No. 31874
Laube Engineering, LLC
Drainage Report
Foster Equipment Company, Inc.
New Office/Shop Building
Page 1
General Location and Description
Site Location
The site is located in the southeast quarter of Section 30, Township 1 North, Range 66 West of
the 6th P.M. in Weld County, Colorado. More specifically, the site is located on the north side
of WCR 4, approximately % miles east of U.S. Highway 85 and about 400 feet west of Weld
County Road 27. The Fulton Lateral Ditch extends along the east side of Weld County Road 27
and the Union Pacific Railroad is located approximately 200 feet east of Weld County Road 27.
A large pond left from a sand/gravel pit operation is located northwest of the site.
In general, land within the site vicinity is industrial. The existing Foster Equipment Company is
located on the property west of the site and Tri County Parts and Equipment is located along
the south side of Weld County Road 4. The land east of the site is vacant and a few residential
homes are located further east of the site. A former sand and gravel pit operated on land north
and northwest of the site.
Project Description
The property is 4.0 acres and presently consists of crushed recycled asphalt surface. The project
will consist of constructing a 5,400 ft2 office building and a 6,000 ft2 shop building. Paved
parking and drives are planned along south and east sides of the office building. Access to the
lot will remain from Weld County Road 4.
Drainage Basin and Site Design Information
Drainage Basin
The site is located in the South Platte River basin. The South Platte River is located
approximately '/z miles west of the site. In general, drainage within the site vicinity flows
northwest to the South Platte River.
Site Drainage
The site is located between two drainage barriers. U.S. Highway 85 extends in a north-south
direction west of the site and the Union Pacific Railroad extends in a north-south direction east
of the site. The site currently drains north. The topography of the site slopes to the north at
about 0.5% with a total relief of about 1 foot across the site.
Adjacent Site Drainage Conditions
The site receives off-site flows from the north half of Weld County Road 4, extending for the
property frontage. The retention pond has been designed to accommodate this off-site runoff.
Site Flood Hazard
The site is in a flood zone "C" according to the Flood Insurance Rate Map (Community Panel
Number 080266 0995C) dated September 28, 1982. The flood zone "C" designation includes
areas of minimal flooding.
Laube Engineering, LLC
Drainage Report
Foster Equipment Company, Inc.
New Office/Shop Building
Page 2
Soil and Groundwater Conditions
Soil information was been obtained from the Soil Survey for Weld County. The Soil Survey
indicates Altvan soil type on the site. The Altvan soils are poorly graded sands that are
classified as Hydrologic Group B.
Drainage Design Criteria
Storm Drainage Criteria
This drainage report was prepared to conform to the Weld County criteria and the Urban Storm
Drainage Criteria Manuals (Volumes 1 and 2 issued June 2001 and Volume 3 issued September
1999), prepared by the Denver Urban Drainage and Flood Control District.
Development Criteria References and Constraints
Site grading was performed to match existing grades where appropriate. Proposed site grades
match existing grades at property lines. Due to the existing watershed barriers and relatively
flat topography within the site vicinity, it is our opinion that it is not feasible to gravity drain a
site detention pond. Since the native sandy soils provide good infiltration rates, a site retention
pond has been designed for the proposed development.
Hydrological Criteria
Stormwater runoff was analyzed using the Rational Method, which is considered acceptable for
sites less than 160 acres. Using the Urban Storm Drainage Criteria Manual, the 100-year one-
hour rainfall for this area is 2.6 inches. The 100-year one-hour rainfall for Greeley is 2.78
inches, slightly more than the subject site. Because the Greeley rainfall values are tabulated, the
rainfall intensity data used for this site is from the City of Greeley Storm Drainage Manual
(Table 3.3). Using the Greeley rainfall data will provide conservative runoff rates and pond
volume. Drainage calculations and referenced information is included in the appendices. The
drainage structures on the site have been designed for a minor storm with a 5-year return period
and a major storm with a 100-year return period.
Hydraulic Criteria
The FAA Method, as described in Volume 2 of the Urban Storm Drainage Criteria Manual,
was used to calculate the pond volume. The retention pond volume has been sized based on 1.5
times the capacity required for the 100-year storm event for the developed conditions plus 1-
foot freeboard. Since there is not an emergency spillway, the pond has been oversized to
accommodate the 2-hour, 100-year storm event assuming no infiltration.
Drainage Facility Design
General Concept
The proposed grading tries to minimize the amount of disturbance to the land while providing a
site plan that provides adequate drainage for the proposed development. Stormwater runoff will
sheet flow northeast across the site to the proposed retention pond. A gentle drainage swale
runs through the center of the crushed recycled asphalt surface to convey runoff from the paved
parking areas to the proposed retention pond. Runoff coefficients have been calculated using
proposed surfaces.
Lauhe Engineering, LLC
Drainage Report
Foster Equipment Company, Inc.
New Office/Shop Building
Page 3
Specific Details
A soil percolation test performed west of the proposed shop building yielded a percolation rate
of 1.6 minutes per inch. Conservatively estimating the percolation rate at 3 minutes per inch,
the infiltration rate through the 9,500 ft2 pond bottom (approximately half of the area covered
during the 100-year storm) is 4.4 cfs. Using an outflow of 4.4 cfs, the pond volume to store the
100-year storm is 10,242 ft3. The retention pond has been designed to retain 15,363 ft3 (1.5
times the volume required for the 100-year storm event) plus 1-foot freeboard (this follows the
recommendation for retention ponds - Volume 2,USDCM).
The bottom of the retention pond is at elevation 95.9 and the top of the pond is at elevation
98.25. The depth of water in the retention pond will be about 13 inches (elevation 97.0) during
a 100-year storm event and 16 inches (elevation 97.25) for a volume of 1.5 times the 100-year
storm event. The retention pond drain time for the 100-year storm event is estimated to be
about 2 to 4 hours.
Because a feasible discharge location for emergency flows is not available, an emergency
spillway has not been designed. Instead, the pond capacity has been designed to accommodate
the 2-hour, 100-year storm event assuming no infiltration of water through the pond bottom.
The pond volume required for the 2-hour, 100-year storm event is 24,823 ft3. The designed
pond has capacity for this volume with 9 inches of freeboard. Since the pond does not have a
built-up berm, it is our opinion that 9 inches of freeboard is sufficient for the assumption that
no infiltration will occur through the pond bottom. The drainage easement shown on the plans
includes the pond area required to hold the 2-hour, 100-year storm event.
Erosion Control
Erosion control during construction of the project should consist of installing silt fence along
the east and north property lines adjacent to the proposed retention pond. The retention pond
should be constructed as a sediment basin prior to other earthwork operations. We recommend
that the construction access drive be the existing gated access. Since the existing site surface is
crushed recycled asphalt and no earthwork is planned near the east access, it is our opinion that
vehicle tracking control is not necessary. We suggest seeding proposed grass areas and placing
crushed recycled asphalt in drive/storage areas upon completion of grading.
Conclusions
This drainage design conforms to the Weld County stormwater drainage criteria.
Laube Engineering, LLC
Appendix A—Runoff and Detention Volume Calculations
Site Location Map (8'/2"x 11") Al
Stormwater Runoff Coefficient A2
Table RO-3 Imperviousness Values A3
Table RO-5 Runoff Coefficients A4
Time of Concentration A5
Figure RO-1 Average Overland Flow Velocity A6
Peak Runoff Flowrates A7
Figure RA-2 Rainfall Depth-Duration-Frequency: 5-Year, 1-Hour Rainfall A8
Figure RA-6 Rainfall Depth-Duration-Frequency: 100-Year, 1-Hour Rainfall A9
Table 3.3 —Extended Duration-Intensity-Frequency Tabulation, Greeley, Colorado.....A10
Retention Pond Infiltration Rate Al 1
Retention Pond Sizing During the 100-Year Storm Event Al2
Retention Pond Sizing During the 100-Year Storm Event (no infiltration) Al3
Retention Pond Stage-Storage Table A14
Drainage swale through crushed asphalt parking/drive area to the retention pond A15
Laube Engineering, LLC
Site Location Map A
N
Foster Equipment Company, Inc. Facility
Property East of 12739 WCR 4
Brighton, Colorado
'1 I o
) , - J r:,.
J
�__-__ ' 0935 BM. • gg
• 4938
al
V 492
Well
5I
F
J
ram /
7- r 1: (Elevator h Feedlot
19 �: R •� :))�2I
r
Well 20
ora o { _---- ((,
ir/ � - N
J r Cso 0
3
- Mabtlakom independence r _
�`� _ School - it
,.- � - Well - •' 8M �SOOi
414926. _ Water 9 Y !1 4950 ^ J
' ° Tank _
! i ° Towe s Y I -
r 0.0.0. -_ E� _ —_ -.
I �ri:IIIIIIIIIII
Site ,�r
00 i3029 28. K.,. I. Gra el Pils \il' m
I I, I 4958 / II ,
.
Iii WC,Ilt 4 • . '1895 O2
Lb
(J\_ I1 O NN
�n SJ
�/
�, well I°98 -
o
—1 1 oftiL4 33/I 147..? 14.97' - I 32! 7y �`_
! I I I —solo
141, • ��' 7/ Qt:k J, L /I
3 3 Motile .a •' • I RIGHTON
0 0
I
¢ ¢ J n ,# -, 9L LINE _ - o \) •� •I- ` •7-... .
•-9AS ,.1 9tt 1 955 / I•• r •�...� -,,C i 97 r- '�• 04 .�� > 150; • • � • I-
AI
STORM RUNOFF COEFFICIENT, C
Historic Site Conditions:
s Percent Weighted Weighted Weighted
Surface Area (ft-) Cs C10 Ctoo
Impervious Average Average Average
grass/landscape 174,034 0 0.08 0.08 0.15 0.15 0.35 0.35
gravel - 40 0.30 0.00 0.36 0.00 0.50 0.00
roofs - 90 0.73 0.00 0.75 0.00 0.81 0.00
Total 174,034 Avg=0% C5 = 0.08 C10 = 0.15 C100 = 0.35
Proposed Conditions for Basin A plus north half of WCR 4 R.O.W.:
z Percent Weighted Weighted Weighted
Surface Area (ft ) Impervious C5 Average C70 Average Ctoo Average
grass/landscape 11,775 0 0.08 0.01 0.15 0.01 0.35 0.02
gravel/crushed asphalt 141,901 40 0.30 0.23 0.36 0.28 0.50 0.38
roofs 11,400 90 0.73 0.04 0.75 0.05 0.81 0.05
concrete/asphalt 20,058 90 0.73 0.08 0.75 0.08 0.81 0.09
Total 185,134 Avg=46% C5 = 0.36 C10 = 0.41 C100 = 0.54
Runoff Coefficient (C) based on Hydrologic Soil Group B (per Weld County Soil Survey)
King Contracting, Inc.
Laube Engineering, LLC Foster Equipment Company, Inc
10/12/2006 A 2 East of 12739 WCR 4, Brighton, Colorado
DRAINAGE CRITERIA , !UAL (V. 1) RUNOFF
TABLE RO-3
Recommended Percentage Imperviousness Values
Land Use or Percentage
Surface Characteristics Imperviousness_
Business:
Commercial areas 95
Neighborhood areas 85
Residential:
Single-family •
Multi-unit(detached) 60
Multi-unit(attached) 75 _
Half-acre lot or larger `
Apartments 80
Industrial:
Light areas 80
Heavy areas 90
Parks, cemeteries 5
Playgrounds 10
Schools 50
Railroad yard areas 15
Undeveloped Areas:
Historic flow analysis 2
Greenbelts, agricultural 2
Off-site flow analysis 45
(when land use not defined)
Streets:
Paved 100
Gravel (packed) 40
Drive and walks 90
Roofs 90
Lawns, sandy soil 0
Lawns, clayey soil 0
* See Figures RO-3 through RO-5 for percentage imperviousness.
Based in part on the data collected by the District since 1969, an empirical relationship between C and
the percentage imperviousness for various storm return periods was developed. Thus, values for C can
be determined using the following equations (Urbonas, Guo and Tucker 1990).
CA = KA + (1.3113 - 1.4412 + 1.135i- 0.12) for CA ≥0, otherwise CA = 0 (RO-6)
CCD = KCD + (0.858i' - 0.78612 + 0.774i+ 0.04) (RO-7)
CB = (CA + CcD)/2
in which:
i = % imperviousness/100 expressed as a decimal (see Table RO-3)
06/2001 RO-9
Urban Drainage and Flood Control District
3
DRAINAGE CRITERIA JUAL (V. 1) RUNOFF
TABLE RO-5
Runoff Coefficients, C
Percentage
Imperviousness Type C and D NRCS Hydrologic Soil Groups
2-yr 5-yr 10-yr 25-yr 50-yr 100-yr
0% 0.04 0.15 0.25 0.37 0.44 0.50
5% 0.08 0.18 0.28 0.39 0.46 0.52
10% 0.11 0.21 0.30 0.41 0.47 0.53
15% 0.14 0.24 0.32 0.43 0.49 0.54
20% 0.17 0.26 0.34 0.44 0.50 0.55
25% 0.20 0.28 0.36 0.46 0.51 0.56
30% 0.22 0.30 0.38 0.47 0.52 0.57
35% 0.25 0.33 0.40 0.48 0.53 0.57
40% 0.28 0.35 0.42 0.50 0.54 0.58
45% 0.31 0.37 0.44 0.51 0.55 0.59
50% 0.34 0.40 0.46 0.53 0.57 0.60
55% 0.37 0.43 0.48 0.55 0.58 0.62
60% 0.41 0.46 0.51 0.57 0.60 0.63
65% 0.45 0.49 0.54 0.59 0.62 0.65
70% 0.49 0.53 0.57 0.62 0.65 0.68
75% 0.54 0.58 0.62 0.66 0.68 0.71
80% 0.60 0.63 0.66 0.70 0.72 0.74
85% 0.66 0.68 0.71 0.75 0.77 0.79
90% 0.73 0.75 0.77 0.80 0.82 0.83
95% 0.80 0.82 0.84 0.87 0.88 0.89
100% 0.89 0.90 0.92 0.94 0.95 0.96
Type B NRCS Hydrologic Soils Group
0% 0.02 0.08 0.15 0.25 0.30 0.35
_
5% 0.04 0.10 0.19 0.28 0.33 0.38
10% 0.06 0.14 0.22 0.31 0.36 0.40
15% 0.08 0.17 0.25 0.33 0.38 0.42
20% 0.12 0.20 0.27 0.35 0.40 0.44
25% 0.15 0.22 0.30 0.37 0.41 0.46
30% 0.18 0.25 0.32 0.39 0.43 0.47
35% 0.20 0.27 0.34 0.41 0.44 0.48
40% 0.23 0.30 0.36 0.42 0.46 0.50
45% 0.26 0.32 0.38 0.44 0.48 0.51
50% 0.29 0.35 0.40 0.46 0.49 0.52
55% 0.33 0.38 0.43 0.48 0.51 0.54
60% 0.37 0.41 0.46 0.51 0.54 0.56
65% 0.41 0.45 0.49 0.54 0.57 0.59
70% 0.45 0.49 0.53 0.58 0.60 0.62
75% 0.51 0.54 0.58 0.62 0.64 0.66
80% 0.57 0.59 0.63 0.66 0.68 0.70
85% 0.63 0.66 0.69 0.72 0.73 0.75
90% 0.71 0.73 0.75 0.78 0.80 0.81
95% 0.79 0.81 0.83 0.85 0.87 0.88
100% 0.89 0.90 0.92 0.94 0.95 0.96
06/2001 RO-11
Urban Drainage and Flood Control District Al-
/ 1 1
O
O) >. O
C C O
II --c- er c a U
~ m E c
c o O
O U F E r 0
E c O c c
E c�, Em
'E Y o.NI
O m
O'U
c CO r o w
co D ~ C Co w c0')
J li N
'E a F C N O
F
E E S
CO
_ _ w
O C r O O C O)
`- F Hp
•.=—
.-
>. T
3 D � 0 4 !: :
O
g (a 0 0 N fa O CO O L
O E. T J Ol t 2 C T O O N
++ u H O) ca) H O) d m
CC C
r o O
0 n^ o 0 n^ o
a)
us o O Cl) o O
C
O To m _-
U > c
`- m N m q ` to
O F J F J
O
p. � � E E N E � .E 'E TO a) 2 cd
- F F — F F
o c 0 c
w at m
LL C15-oCD — ^ co LL � t:_- .V a O
C - O 'O - CO
c Y on o c >- = U a
m o o m Lo cc o
0 0 a`) 0
> >
0 Sao O ma^ o
m F. o0 o m a o0
— L _ t
O O To O
•'' Cw O �
.... C r
— a) v ;C a) v
— J — J
0 O
N C J
C O
O
P a H
N c
Q
'v m mc mm a>U m 8v c.c C C WCV
OO c c cn c ala) •N 'p 'N .Oxa oa JO
A5
DRAINAGE CRITERIA . JUAL (V. 1) RUNOFF
50
30
3
0
t- 2 0 3 4"
= o°
0 # or ra*, �W/
Q
W • �� t/
VJ
a 10 4 J 3
_ o 0 A 44
r
0 0 41 CJ et y4-
W
Jr , JPo oe .W
V 4r f
U) A. JJ 0 49 O
�.7 i yb v aN 4v
W
CO 3 r $ Ve' r VP' W
J .'r C I A. rW �.4.
0 .1 04'
cc 2 - . +O lyr j
y ! P
ill et
4f r
et 4 0
�4r
1 4r
5 A ' f1)//
.1 .2 .3 .5 1 2 3 5 10 20
VELOCITY IN FEET PER SECOND
FIGURE RO-1
Estimate of Average Overland Flow Velocity for Use With the Rational Formula
06/2001 RO-13
Urban Drainage and Flood Control District
Peak Runoff Flowrates
5-Year Storm Runoff for Historic Conditions:
Design Runoff Time of Rainfall Area Runoff, Q
Point Basin Coefficient Concentration, Intensity (acres) (cfs)
(C5) tc(minutes) (la)
1 Site 0.08 40 1.92 4.00 0.6
100-Year Storm Runoff for Historic Conditions:
Design Runoff Time of Rainfall Area Runoff, Q
Point Basin Coefficient Concentration, Intensity (acres) (cfs)
(C100) tc(minutes) OHO
1 Site 0.35 40 3.95 4.00 5.5
5-Year Storm Runoff for Proposed Conditions:
Design Runoff Time of Rainfall Area Runoff, Q
Point Basin Coefficient Concentration, Intensity (acres) (cfs)
(C5) tc(minutes) (la)
1 Site 0.36 14 3.52 4.25 5.4
100-Year Storm Runoff for Proposed Conditions:
Design Runoff Time of Rainfall Area Runoff, Q
Basin Coefficient Concentration, Intensity
Point (C100) tc(minutes) (Iwo)
(acres) (cfs)
1 A 0.54 14 6.57 4.25 15.2
King Contracting, Inc.
Laube Engineering, LLC Foster Equipment Company, Inc.
10/12/2006 ^ East of 12739 WCR 4, Brighton, Colorado
RAINFALL DR \GE CRITERIA MANUAL (V. 1)
R 71 W R 70 W R 69 W R 68 W R 67 W R 66 W R 65 W R 64 W R 63 W
1.3 1 41.45 1.45 1.4 1.35 1.35 1.4
�i r i t
F I L•OIGMONT I F
Z
2
FN
I NIWOT I I / \I ,,,
1I—' I
/ 3I z
III
J
2~
WE �
BRIGHT•"• ADA S m
w w K 0
0
o I
m
B0* DER
JE ERSON r I J
o N /
cs
P— 4 0 1 r DENVER F
il
ro
1.1 " 137
I /
/ 0 •VER ' 39
ADAMS
N ARPPAHOE
vp
[tee- -
1,0 • ��
RG'EEN
` 1 1 i
ut
1.4
LL ' F
"Li
PAHOE ARPAHOE
D• GLAS ELBERT
g
PAR ER
f • 5a
D 0
00
W
•
tn
.... SEDALIA tn
n
X 1.39
-
1.0 1.17 1.2 1.3 FRANKE.
1.4 1.4
R 71 W R 70 W R 69 W R 68 W R 67 W R 66 W R 65 W R 64 W R 63 w
FIGURE RA-2
Rainfall Depth-Duration-Frequency: 5-Year, 1-Hour Rainfall
RA-14
06/2001
A8 Urban Drainage and Flood Control District
RAINFALL DRAIN = CRITERIA MANUAL (V. 1)
R 71 W R 70 W R 69 W R 68 W R 67 w R 65 w R 65 W R 64 VI R 63 W
2.4 2.5 2.65 2.7 2.7 2.6 2 65 2.7
Z
2 6 LONGMONt \
o
•
N ► NIWO, 1 ,
h
J
51 o z
I/ ELD BRIGH10 • OWE
2.3
/m `0
10j DER
J F ER ON 7 -t t
¢j ENVER
F `
I / o
2.2 / ' A w
/ ADAMS
O'•VER ARAPAHOE
F 2.15 Sit
2.1 J�� �� 2.7
i 14
EVE SEEN
ui
11a \ / X2.65
w4 `
1 , A {TAHOE ARAPAHOE
2.05 , , 0 b G1AS ELBERT
ON6ER
• Ia
PAYER to
1 o PcR
I • ow
to
0 w
2.05 SEDALIA vi
F , ---.›,4ANKt4WN 2.6 r
2.5
R 71 W 1 R 70 w 15 2R 269 W 23 • 4R 68 W R 67 W R 66 5
R 65 W R 64 W R 63 W
FIGURE RA-6
Rainfall Depth-Duration-Frequency: 100-Year, 1-Hour Rainfall
RA-18 06/2001
AUrban Drainage and Flood Control District
Table 3.3. Extended Duration-Intensity-Frequency Tabulation, Greeley, Colorado.
a`' " ' Storm7;requency
Duration 2-YeaC 5 year 10-year 25-year 50-year 100 year
(inlhr) .. : (inlhr) : (in/hr) (inhu) (in%hr) (mlhr) ,'•
'
5 min 3.62 5.19 6.12 7.31 8.73 9.67
10 2.81 4.02 4.75 5.67 6.78 7.51
15 2.37 3.4 4.01 4.79 5.72 6.34
20 2 2.86 3.38 4.03 4.81 5.34
25 1.77 2.54 3 3.58 4.28 4.74
30 1.64 2.35 2.78 3.22 3.97 4.39
40 1.34 1.92 2.27 2.7 3.23 3.59
50 1.16 1.66 1.96 2.34 2.8 3.1
60 (1 hr) 1.04 1.49 1.76 2.1 2.51 2.78
80 0.8 1.14 1.47 1.61 1.91 2.16
100 0.67 0.94 1.2 1.3 1.58 1.79
120 (2 hr) 0.58 0.8 0.96 1.14 1.3 1.5
150 0.49 0.66 0.78 0.93 1.1 1.23
180 (3 hr) 0.42 0.56 0.67 0.8 0.92 1.05
4 hr 0.33 0.44 0.53 0.62 0.72 0.81
5 0.27 0.36 0.43 0.5 0.57 0.66
6 0.23 0.3 0.37 0.43 0.49 0.57
8 0.2 0.24 0.29 0.34 0.39 0.44
10 0.15 0.2 0.24 0.29 0.32 0.36
12 0.13 0.17 0.2 0.25 0.28 0.31
14 0.11 0.15 0.18 0.23 0.24 0.27
16 0.1 0.13 , 0.16 0.2 0.22 0.24
18 0.09 0.12 0.14 0.18 0.19 • 0.21
20 0.08 0.11 0.13 0.17 0.18 0.19
22 0.07 0.1 0.12 0.16 0.16 0.17
24 _ 0.07 0.09 0.11 0.14 0.15 0.16
Retention Pond Infiltration Rate
Q = kiA where:
Q = infiltration rate into bottom of pond
k = soil percolation rate
i = hydraulic gradient (assumed to be 1.0)
A = average area of pond bottom
k determined from soil percolation test performed at a depth of 2.5 feet
soil classification: poorly graded sand
k = 1.6 minutes per inch = 8.7 x 104 ft/s
Use k = 3.0 minutes per inch = 4.63 x 10° ft/s
Assumed maximum area of pond bottom = 9,500 square feet
Q = KiA = 4.4cfs
King Contracting, Inc.
Laube Engineering, LLC Foster Equipment Company, Inc.
8/24/2006 A I l East of 12739 WCR 4, Brighton, Colorado
Retention Pond Sizing for 100-Year Storm Event
(Retention pond volume required for subject property)
Site Drainage Basin Area (area being detained) 4.250 acres
Time of Concentration tc 14 minutes
100-year Developed Runoff Coefficient, C100 0.54
Maximum release due to infiltration along bottom of pond (Qo„) 4.4 cfs
Rainfall 100-Year Inflow Average Outflow Storage Storage
Duration, t Rainfall Volume Outflow Volume Volume
Intensity, 3 CIAt - kQo ,t
Volume (ac-
(minutes) CIAt (ft3) kQa , (cfs) kQo ,t (ft") ft)
1100(in/hr)(ft3)
5 9.67 6,697 4.40 1,320 5,377 0.123
10 7.51 10,402 4.40 2,640 7,762 0.178
15 6.34 13,172 4.40 3,960 9,212 0.211
20 5.34 14,792 4.40 5,280 9,512 0.218
25 4.74 16,413 4.40 6,600 9,813 0.225
30 4.39 18,241 4.40 7,920 10,321 0.237
35 3.94 19,099 4.40 9,240 9,859 0.226
40 3.59 19,889 4.40 10,560 9,329 0.214
45 3.32 20,692 4.40 11,880 8,812 0.202
50 3.10 21,468 4.40 13,200 8,268 0.190
55 2.93 22,320 4.40 14,520 7,800 0.179
60 2.78 23,102 4.40 15,840 7,262 0.167
70 2.42 23,462 4.40 18,480 4,982 0.114
80 2.15 23,822 4.40 21,120 2,702 0.062
90 1.94 24,183 4.40 23,760 423 0.010
100 1.76 24,376 4.40 26,400 -2,024 -0.046
120 1.50 24,930 4.40 31,680 -6,750 -0.155
180 1.05 26,177 4.40 47,520 -21,343 -0.490
Required Pond Volume = 1.5 x calculated volume = 15,481 ft3
King Contracting, Inc.
Laube Engineering, LLC Foster Equipment, Inc.
10/12/2006 East of 12739 WCR 4, Brighton, Colorado
A I 2
Retention Pond Sizing for 100-Year Storm Event
(Retention pond volume required for subject property assuming no infiltration)
Site Drainage Basin Area (area being detained) 4.250 acres
Time of Concentration t, 14 minutes
100-year Developed Runoff Coefficient, C100 0.54
Release due to infiltration along bottom of pond (Qo i) 0.0 cfs
Rainfall 100-Year Inflow Average Outflow Storage Storage
e
Rainfall Volume 9
Duration, t Volume Outflow Volume Volume (ac-
(minutes) Intensity, CIAt (ft3) kQo„t (cfs) kQo„tt (ft3) CIAt sQo �t ft)
Imo (in/hr)(ft )
5 9.67 6,697 0.00 0 6,697 0.154
10 7.51 10,402 0.00 0 10,402 0.239
15 6.34 13,172 0.00 0 13,172 0.302
20 5.34 14,792 0.00 0 14,792 0.340
25 4.74 16,413 0.00 0 16,413 0.377
30 4.39 18,241 0.00 0 18,241 0.419
35 3.94 19,099 0.00 0 19,099 0.438
40 3.59 19,889 0.00 0 19,889 0.457
45 3.32 20,692 0.00 0 20,692 0.475
50 3.10 21,468 0.00 0 21,468 0.493
55 2.93 22,320 0.00 0 22,320 0.512
60 2.78 23,102 0.00 0 23,102 0.530
70 2.42 23,462 0.00 0 23,462 0.539
80 2.15 23,822 0.00 0 23,822 0.547
90 1.94 24,183 0.00 0 24,183 0.555
100 1.76 24,376 0.00 0 24,376 0.560
120 1.50 24,930 0.00 0 24,930 0.572
Required Pond Volume = 24,930 ft3
King Contracting, Inc.
Laube Engineering, LLC Foster Equipment, Inc.
10/12/2006 I3 East of 12739 WCR 4, Brighton, Colorado
Retention Pond
Stage-Storage Table
Water Elevation Area (ft2) Cumulative
Depth (ft) (feet) Volume (ft3)
0.00 95.90 0 0
0.10 96.00 4,676 156
1.10 97.00 19,017 11,197 100-year volume
1.35 97.25 26,524 16,864 1.5 times 100-yr volume
1.62 97.52 34,031 25,017 2-hr 100-yr storm with no release
2.35 98.25 58,836 58,503 top of berm
Pond volume for 100-year storm = 10,321 ft3 (Elevation = 97.00)
1.5 times 100-year pond volume = 15,481 ft3 (Elevation = 97.25)
Volume for 2-hr 100-yr storm with no infiltration = 24,930 ft3 (Elevation = 97.52)
Pond berm elevation = 98.25
King Contracting, Inc.
Laube Engineering, LLC Foster Equipment Company, Inc.
10/12/2006 A 14 East of 12739 WCR 4, Brighton, Colorado
Normal Flow Analysis - Trapezoidal Channel
Project: Foster Equipment Company, Inc.
Channel ID: Swale through crushed recylced asphalt parking/drive area
n T
F
X
Y 1� •
Y° / 1
Z1 a 13 > Z2
Design Information(Input)
Channel Invert Slope So= 0.0067 ft/ft
Manning's n n= 0.025
Bottom Width B= 0.00 ft
Left Side Slope Z1 = 10.00 ft/ft
Right Side Slope Z2= 10.00 ft/ft
Freeboard Height F= 0.00 ft
Design Water Depth Y= 0.77 ft
Normal Flow Condtion (Calculated}
Discharge Q= 15.26 cfs
Froude Number Fr= 0.73
Flow Velocity V= 2.57 fps
Flow Area A= 5.93 sq ft
Top Width T= 15.40 ft
Wetted Perimeter P= 15.48 ft
Hydraulic Radius R= 0.38 ft
Hydraulic Depth D= 0.39 ft
Specific Energy Es= 0.87 ft
Centroid of Flow Area Yo= 0.25 ft
Specific Force Fs= 0.17 kip
UD-Channels Center of Lot 327.xls, Basics 8/16/2006, 12:37 PM
A 1
I rd
>n .wm nwwYf/ "—."-milt
e.c nr ron� roa n .voa� Y au rlau.wor.rin LEY0B 0.'1 17V1'73A07 - 0nP♦L�/'
- r r ria ni. l .,••••' "- 3'W��N0SI01'll OOf lC/dt 10 78P1/iy��� �js �
motto
—ruW xn. PI DHI2I�3MIJDL3 3HRtl I avr LOMIN0J 9VrY as ACA mourn 7$ m
'Ii lib
hi il
a Ea : rn k r a 3 I i e
I
= !I! w 6 �a�� III 1 o i
U 1 lli
p 6
qii
7 [€
4
I u eai m` II E . I II I : ': f8 r. isR i
I 1 '
6S 8' w aid
IIe61; W n
J 6 q
2
Y as ie°' i'M r Mb LLfi
N EI �w
I c 1111
4 a� v n E ll g!', F
` 8.6
Z (n2 : 1I1 E < o ei � A � EII � �
/1u.
I
Ilc 1 I I ! a Y 8 Y C 2 $ 3 9 ! _ ' iE�� s 11 i!
I li�li !� Yl
I I t I
@ @ %PI 9
ii All asap a S#
a 'lai 4i AI gig it
6 al Y C II I I F Z °liS
I
�' fig; I 0 q :I ?
C W , L € -' Ly ui
.N'11 hn..@py �. �. I < l II
IYI
�-�x__ x x I-
6 :1
!S i O n all c 4 LL�¢
u
i o$ iI = VI
c. ^f Si C iy I ti gW
\,.._/„.„...„..
irl I
' JI
oN \ C 1 1 Iil g.:J 1 DLO
\\ 4 1 € a
IL
aa
1'`9.2°'.92. I --- -------
qY y8 ) n
h �, l .Y �e 1^a I - :
'DEI 1 I
{ � iwal
- h'`-1\
a 4- �q! ' ' it I I!I
� � wtE
5
" 5.0• •
114 it..r 4 , .
"4444 '51?ueewm nu.a !III 4'
11 I I ^7.I li, IllCIO=vI 'Ior I I 1 in
11 1� I
1 / \ ) 1\ - ri- \ ll I :
I��MM//�N1���� Y[ an crab,-- arms ----,
OJI '/ / , I • •HLI : jti
Et Wit i I I
\i r E
av
Ve
`gA AS ...------
\-0 wall ti B: i ii I , it n
iii ,,,,,. , w
�, I aga I I \ ? -
I d III
---- — — ill I
Stormwater Management Plan (SWMP)
Foster Equipment Company,Inc.
12739 WCR 4,Brighton, Colorado
The SWMP was prepared in accordance with good engineering, hydrologic and pollution control
practices. The main objective of this plan is to identify Best Management Practices (BMP's)
which when implemented will meet the terms and conditions of the general permit.
The plan identifies potential sources of pollution, including sediment,which may reasonably be
expected to affect the quality of stormwater discharges associated with the construction activity
of this facility. In addition,the plan describes the implementation of BMP's which will be used
to reduce pollutants in stormwater discharge associated with the construction activity.
Construction operations must implement the provisions of the SWMP required under this part as
a condition of the permit.
1. Site Description
a) The planned construction activity consists of constructing an office and a shop building
and parking lot/drives. The construction activity will consist of grading to achieve desired
grades for the building,parking lot and driveways. The activity will also include the
construction of underground utilities and septic leach field. The finished construction will
include concrete pavement, concrete walks, gravel driveways and landscaped areas.
b) The proposed sequence for major activities is as follows:
• Installation of erosion control devices that will include excavation of the
stormwater retention pond to be used as a sediment basin during construction
activities.
• Topsoil stripping and subgrade preparation for cut and fill per the grading plan.
• The building pad will be prepared for foundation and slab-on-grade construction.
• Construction of underground utilities beginning with leach field and water lines,
followed by dry utilities.
• Placement of concrete pavement in parking areas and gravel in driveways.
• Landscaping
c) The total area of disturbance on the 4-acre site will be approximately 3.0 acres.
d) The estimated 100-year runoff coefficient for the site prior to construction is 0.35 and is
expected to be 0.54 after construction activities are completed. The percent impervious
before and after construction is estimated to be 40%and 46%respectively.
e) The site currently consists of a vacant property with crushed recycled asphalt surface.
f) We do not anticipate any other potential pollution sources
g) We do not anticipate any non-stormwater discharge from the site during construction.
h) The stormwater from this site will be routed to the proposed stormwater retention pond
located at the northeast corner of the property. Stormwater in the retention pond will be
released by infiltrating the sandy subgrade soils. The site and retention pond is located in
the South Platte River basin.
2. Site Map
Please refer to sheet C2 and C3 for the site map and SWMP and BMP specifics for this
project. These plans identify the area of disturbance, areas of cut and fill, and location of
erosion control devices. There are no existing springs, streams, wetlands, or other surface
waters on this site. The site is not located within the 100-year floodplain.
3. BMP's for Stormwater Pollution Prevention
a) Erosion and Sediment Controls
• Structural Practices
This project will utilize gravel and rock rip rap to minimize erosion.
• Non-structural Practices
Contractor is responsible for periodic inspection and maintenance of erosion
control devices.
b) Materials Handling and Spill Prevention
The contractor is responsible for identifying and specifying material handling and
spill prevention control to include, but not limited to, exposed materials such as
fertilizers,waste piles, and equipment maintenance and fueling areas.
4. Final Stabilization and Long term Stormwater Management
Final stabilization will be achieved by the final vegetative cover. The contractor will be
responsible for establishing healthy stands of grass and vegetative cover where specified. The
landscaped areas will be irrigated and will be maintained by the owner upon completion of
construction.
5. Other Controls
None.
6. Inspection and Maintenance
The contractor is responsible for the inspection and maintenance of erosion control devices.
iLOhI
29 2007
L_
Stormwater Management Plan (SWMP) V �, — __J
Foster Equipment Com an Inc. �'' :NTY f
Company,
For property directly east of 12739 WCR 4,Brighton, Colorado
The SWMP was prepared in accordance with good engineering, hydrologic and pollution control
practices. The main objective of this plan is to identify Best Management Practices (BMP's)
which when implemented will meet the terms and conditions of the general permit.
The plan identifies potential sources of pollution, including sediment, which may reasonably be
expected to affect the quality of stormwater discharges associated with the construction activity
of this facility. In addition, the plan describes the implementation of BMP's which will be used
to reduce pollutants in stormwater discharge associated with the construction activity.
Construction operations must implement the provisions of the SWMP required under this part as
a condition of the permit.
1. Site Description
a) The planned construction activity consists of constructing an office and a shop building
and parking lot/drives. The construction activity will consist of grading to achieve desired
grades for the building, parking lot and driveways. The activity will also include the
construction of underground utilities and septic leach field. The finished construction will
include concrete pavement, concrete walks, gravel driveways and landscaped areas.
b) The proposed sequence for major activities is as follows:
• Installation of erosion control devices that will include excavation of the
stormwater retention pond to be used as a sediment basin during construction
activities.
• Topsoil stripping and subgrade preparation for cut and fill per the grading plan.
• The building pad will be prepared for foundation and slab-on-grade construction.
• Construction of underground utilities beginning with leach field and water lines,
followed by dry utilities.
• Placement of concrete pavement in parking areas and gravel in driveways.
• Landscaping
c) The total area of disturbance on the 4-acre site will be approximately 3.0 acres.
d) The estimated 100-year runoff coefficient for the site prior to construction is 0.35 and is
expected to be 0.53 after construction activities are completed. The percent impervious
before and after construction is estimated to be 30%and 42%respectively.
e) The site currently consists of a vacant property with crushed recycled asphalt surface.
O We do not anticipate any other potential pollution sources
g) We do not anticipate any non-stormwater discharge from the site during construction.
h) The stormwater from this site will be routed to the proposed stormwater retention pond
located at the northeast corner of the property. Stormwater in the retention pond will be
released by infiltrating the sandy subgrade soils. The site and retention pond is located in
the South Platte River basin.
2. Site Map
Please refer to sheet C2 and C3 for the site map and SWMP and BMP specifics for this
project. These plans identify the area of disturbance, areas of cut and fill, and location of
erosion control devices. There are no existing springs, streams, wetlands, or other surface
waters on this site. The site is not located within the 100-year floodplain.
3. BMP's for Stormwater Pollution Prevention
a) Erosion and Sediment Controls
• Structural Practices
This project will utilize gravel and rock rip rap to minimize erosion.
• Non-structural Practices
Contractor is responsible for periodic inspection and maintenance of erosion
control devices.
b) Materials Handling and Spill Prevention
The contractor is responsible for identifying and specifying material handling and
spill prevention control to include, but not limited to, exposed materials such as
fertilizers,waste piles, and equipment maintenance and fueling areas.
4. Final Stabilization and Long term Stormwater Management
Final stabilization will be achieved by the final vegetative cover. The contractor will be
responsible for establishing healthy stands of grass and vegetative cover where specified. The
landscaped areas will be irrigated and will be maintained by the owner upon completion of
construction.
5. Other Controls
None.
6. Inspection and Maintenance
The contractor is responsible for the inspection and maintenance of erosion control devices.
Drainage Report for
Foster Equipment Company. Inc. Facility
Property Located Directly East of 12739 WCR 4
Brighton, Colorado
Prepared For:
King Contracting, Inc
300 Madison Avenue
Loveland, CO 80537
Prepared By:
Laube Engineering, LLC
6250 W 10th Street, Ste 3
Greeley, CO 80634
(970) 356-3099
Project No. 327
October 12, 2006
Revised January 16, 2007
r
LAUBE 6250 W 10th Street,Ste 3
ENGINEERING, LLC Greeley,CO 886384-8856
e6250 laubth @ Ste Set
Fax: (970)356-3143
Telephone: (970)356-3099
January 16, 2007 Project No.: 327
Randy King
King Contracting, Inc.
300 Madison Avenue
Loveland, CO 80537
Subject: Drainage Report for Foster Equipment Company,Inc. Facility
Property located directly east of 12739 WCR 4
Brighton, Colorado
Dear Randy:
•
This resubmittal is a drainage study for the proposed development. The redesigned retention
pond is smaller and deeper than the original design. Parking, driving, and displays are not
included in the area of the new pond. Since the pond bottom will not be used for display and
parking,the calculation to check the pond volume assuming no infiltration is not necessary.
A variance to Weld County Code Chapter 24-7-130 will be required because a stormwater
retention pond (release by infiltration into the subgrade soils) has been designed instead of a
detention pond (release to an existing drainage system).
It has been a pleasure being part of your project. If you have any questions, please call me at
(970) 356-3099.
Sincerely,
LAUBE ENGINEERING, LLC
Keith A. Laube, P.E.
Civil Engineer
Table of Contents
Engineer Certification
General Location and Description
Site Location 1
Project Description 1
Drainage Basin and Site Design Information 1
Drainage Basin 1
Site Drainage 1
Adjacent Site Drainage Conditions 1
Site Flood Hazard 1
Soil and Groundwater Conditions 2
Drainage Design Criteria 2
Storm Drainage Criteria 2
Development Criteria References and Constraints 2
Hydrological Criteria 2
Hydraulic Criteria 2
Drainage Facility Design 2
General Concept 2
Specific Details 3
Erosion Control 3
Conclusions 3
Appendix A—Runoff and Detention Volume Calculations 4
ENCLOSURES: 11"x 17" Drainage, Grading and Erosion Control Plan
Laube Engineering, LLC
Drainage Report
Foster Equipment Company, Inc.
New Office/Shop Building
Page i
Engineer Certification
I hereby certify that this report for the drainage design for the Foster Equipment Company, Inc.
property located directly east of 12739 Weld County Road 4, Brighton, Colorado was prepared
by me (or under my direct supervision) in accordance with the provisions of the Weld County
Storm Drainage Criteria for the owners thereof.
cy�Q OA G,jGFpo.
; c?:p t
I '� 31874 m' '
S " Y
Keith A. Laube, P.E.
Registered Professional Engineer
State of Colorado No. 31874
Laube Engineering, LLC
Drainage Report
Foster Equipment Company, Inc.
New Office/Shop Building
Page 1
General Location and Description
Site Location
The site is located in the southeast quarter of Section 30, Township 1 North, Range 66 West of
the 6th P.M. in Weld County, Colorado. More specifically, the site is located on the north side
of WCR 4, approximately '/ miles east of U.S. Highway 85 and about 400 feet west of Weld
County Road 27. The Fulton Lateral Ditch extends along the east side of Weld County Road 27
and the Union Pacific Railroad is located approximately 200 feet east of Weld County Road 27.
A large pond left from a sand/gravel pit operation is located northwest of the site.
In general, land within the site vicinity is industrial. The existing Foster Equipment Company is
located on the property west of the site and Tri County Parts and Equipment is located along
the south side of Weld County Road 4. The land east of the site is vacant and a few residential
homes are located further east of the site. A former sand and gravel pit operated on land north
and northwest of the site.
Project Description
The property is 4.0 acres and presently consists of crushed recycled asphalt surface. The project
will consist of constructing a 5,400 ft2 office building and a 6,000 ft2 shop building. Paved
parking and drives are planned along south and east sides of the office building. Access to the
lot will remain from Weld County Road 4.
Drainage Basin and Site Design Information
Drainage Basin
The site is located in the South Platte River basin. The South Platte River is located
approximately '/I miles west of the site. In general, drainage within the site vicinity flows
northwest to the South Platte River.
Site Drainage
The site is located between two drainage barriers. U.S. Highway 85 extends in a north-south
direction west of the site and the Union Pacific Railroad extends in a north-south direction east
of the site. The site currently drains north. The topography of the site slopes to the north at
about 0.5%with a total relief of about 1 foot across the site.
Adjacent Site Drainage Conditions
The site receives off-site flows from the north half of Weld County Road 4, extending for the
property frontage. The retention pond has been designed to accommodate this off-site runoff.
Site Flood Hazard
The site is in a flood zone "C" according to the Flood Insurance Rate Map (Community Panel
Number 080266 0995C) dated September 28, 1982. The flood zone "C" designation includes
areas of minimal flooding.
Laube Engineering, LLC
Drainage Report
Foster Equipment Company, Inc.
New Office/Shop Building
Page 2
Soil and Groundwater Conditions
Soil information was been obtained from the Soil Survey for Weld County. The Soil Survey
indicates Altvan soil type on the site. The Altvan soils are poorly graded sands that are
classified as Hydrologic Group B.
Drainage Design Criteria
Storm Drainage Criteria
This drainage report was prepared to conform to the Weld County criteria and the Urban Storm
Drainage Criteria Manuals (Volumes 1 and 2 issued June 2001 and Volume 3 issued September
1999), prepared by the Denver Urban Drainage and Flood Control District.
Development Criteria References and Constraints
Site grading was performed to match existing grades where appropriate. Proposed site grades
match existing grades at property lines. Due to the existing watershed barriers and relatively
flat topography within the site vicinity, it is our opinion that it is not feasible to gravity drain a
site detention pond. Since the native sandy soils provide good infiltration rates, a site retention
pond has been designed for the proposed development.
Hydrological Criteria
Stormwater runoff was analyzed using the Rational Method, which is considered acceptable for
sites less than 160 acres. Using the Urban Storm Drainage Criteria Manual, the 100-year one-
hour rainfall for this area is 2.6 inches. The 100-year one-hour rainfall for Greeley is 2.78
inches, slightly more than the subject site. Because the Greeley rainfall values are tabulated, the
rainfall intensity data used for this site is from the City of Greeley Storm Drainage Manual
(Table 3.3). Using the Greeley rainfall data will provide conservative runoff rates and pond
volume. Drainage calculations and referenced information is included in s. The , /
drainage structures on the site have been designed for a minor storm wi a 5-year retu eriod v
and a major storm with a 100-year return period.
Hydraulic Criteria
The FAA Method, as described in Volume 2 of the Urban Storm Drainage Criteria Manual,
'/
was used to calculate the pond volume. The retention pond volume has been sized based on l.S
times the capacity required for the 100-year storm event for the developed conditions plus 1- ✓
foot freebo
Drainage Facility Design
General Concept
The proposed grading tries to minimize the amount of disturbance to the land while providing a
site plan that provides adequate drainage for the proposed development. Stormwater runoff will
sheet flow northeast across the site to the proposed retention pond. A gentle drainage swale
runs through the center of the crushed recycled asphalt surface to convey runoff from the paved
parking areas to the proposed retention pond. Runoff coefficients have been calculated using
proposed surfaces.
Laube Engineering, LLC
Drainage Report
Foster Equipment Company, Inc.
PL.1552--
New Office/Shop Building S C
Page 3 ��
eirek—
Specific Details
A soil percolation test performed west of the proposed shop building yielded a percolation rate
of 1.6 minutes per inch. Using a pert i la 'e n rate at 1.6 minutes per inch, the infiltration rate
through the 5,650 112 pond bottom ' 4.' cfs sing an outflow of 4.8 cfs, the pond volume to
store the 100-year storm is 9,136 ft . -- e retention pond has been designed to retain 13,705 ft3
(1.5 times the volume required for the 100-year storm event) plus 1-foot freeboard (this follows
the recommendation for retention ponds -Volume 2, USDCM).
The bottom of the retention pond is at elevation 91.5 and the top of the pond is at elevation
96.6. The retention pond drain time for the 100-year storm event is estimated to be about 2 to 4
hours. The drainage easement shown on the plans includes the pond area required to hold 1.5
times the 100-year storm event with 1-foot of freeboard.
Because a feasible discharge location for emergency flows is not available, an emergency
�b spillway has not been designed. Since the pond does not have a built-up berm, it is our opinion
. , ` that an emergency spillway is not needed to maintain the integrity of the pond.
Erosion Control
Erosion control during construction of the project should consist of installing silt fence along
the east and north property lines adjacent to the proposed retention pond. The retention pond
should be constructed as a sediment basin prior to other earthwork operations. We recommend
that the construction access drive be the existing gated access. Since the existing site surface is
crushed recycled asphalt and no earthwork is planned near the east access, it is our opinion that
vehicle tracking control is not necessary. We suggest seeding proposed grass areas and placing
crushed recycled asphalt in drive/storage areas upon completion of grading.
Conclusions
This drainage design conforms to the Weld County stormwater drainage criteria.
Laube Engineering, LLC
Appendix A—Runoff and Detention Volume Calculations
Site Location Map (8%"x 11") Al
Stormwater Runoff Coefficient A2
Table RO-3 Imperviousness Values A3
Table RO-5 Runoff Coefficients A4
Time of Concentration A5
Figure RO-1 Average Overland Flow Velocity A6
Peak Runoff Flowrates A7
Figure RA-2 Rainfall Depth-Duration-Frequency: 5-Year, 1-Hour Rainfall A8
Figure RA-6 Rainfall Depth-Duration-Frequency: 100-Year, 1-Hour Rainfall A9
Table 3.3 —Extended Duration-Intensity-Frequency Tabulation, Greeley, Colorado.....A10
Retention Pond Infiltration Rate A 1 1
Retention Pond Sizing During the 100-Year Storm Event Al2
Retention Pond Stage-Storage Table Al3
Drainage swale through crushed asphalt parking/drive area to the retention pond A 14
Laube Engineering, LLC
... a
Site Location Map A
N
Foster Equipment Company, Inc. Facility
Property East of 12739 WCR 4
Brighton, Colorado
.? �
1L I. � Cr—).o93b, 9M 99r
ill 4938 �. _
5
I
Ill
It Weil; —__ !_ rill __ _
940
ram
'.V IeJtar I Feedloi� � � )
19 oweu
d 'LI 20 ) 1• a e
I.i _ _ 7i5 J__15 :5 _____/ (
NIra lit A
�C `� . �, _A , N\ 606°_
° oml -
I
4rk In ependence3,School '' /�� N (\ 2.Welll_ •.•I 8 .'� boo/ t
1
fife, Water 4947 1 4950 I 4999 j / I1/4\ /
° Tank
/ °o TRackow- � 1 / _ . soy
ow- s
'I Site / ,
r
I. i _ o
'
050 530 -- 29 l �� I 28
1 it I•
/
Uvelh )
lI TT
lrLi
• • ;L hi c \
J + I •
. ,<96l 4999 ti%_Si ••l -9960—�// \
:
... o Well
X90,
31�1� . .
/, M1 3/ 8 32 . • NO . 33
'i i• 11 I solo,__
• Sr/ . L74 [ :cetrackJ Mo lle _ :RIGHT0N I . .
BA •�• .95 :i1-••lie • ••Mi spa s. . r— LINE _.— -1• .r 4 • @OS
AI
STORM RUNOFF COEFFICIENT, C
Historic Site Conditions:
Percent Weighted Weighted Weighted
Surface Area (ftz) Ce C10 C10o
Impervious Average Average Average
grass/landscape 174,034 0 0.08 0.08 0.15 0.15 0.35 0.35
gravel - 40 0.30 0.00 0.36 0.00 0.50 0.00
roofs - 90 0.73 0.00 0.75 0.00 0.81 0.00
Total 174,034 Avg=0% C5 = 0.08 C10 = 0.15 C100 = 0.35
Proposed Conditions for Basin A plus north half of WCR 4 R.O.W.:
z Percent Weighted Weighted Weighted
Surface Area (ft ) Impervious O5 Average —1° Average C10o Average
grass/landscape 29,833 0 0.08 0.01 0.15 0.02 0.35 0.06
gravel/crushed asphalt 123,843 40 0.30 0.20 0.36 0.24 0.50 0.33
roofs 11,400 90 0.73 0.04 0.75 0.05 0.81 0.05
concrete/asphalt 20,058 90 0.73 0.08 0.75 0.08 0.81 0.09
Total 185,134 Avg=42% C5 = 0.34 C10 = 0.39 C1oo = 0.53
Runoff Coefficient(C) based on Hydrologic Soil Group B (per Weld County Soil Survey)
King Contracting, Inc.
Laube Engineering, LLC A Foster Equipment Company, Inc
1/16/2007 Z East of 12739 WCR 4, Brighton, Colorado
DRAINAGE CRITERIA MANUAL (V. 1) RUNOFF
TABLE RO-3
Recommended Percentage Imperviousness Values
Land Use or Percentage
Surface Characteristics Imperviousness
Business:
Commercial areas 95
Neighborhood areas 85
Residential:
Single-family *
Multi-unit(detached) 60
Multi-unit (attached) 75
Half-acre lot or larger *
Apartments 80
Industrial:
Light areas 80
Heavy areas 90
Parks, cemeteries 5
Playgrounds 10
Schools 50
Railroad yard areas 15
Undeveloped Areas:
Historic flow analysis 2
Greenbelts, agricultural 2
Off-site flow analysis 45
(when land use not defined)
Streets:
Paved 100
Gravel (packed) 40
Drive and walks 90
Roofs 90
Lawns, sandy soil 0
Lawns, clayey soil 0
* See Figures RO-3 through RO-5 for percentage imperviousness.
Based in part on the data collected by the District since 1969, an empirical relationship between c and
the percentage imperviousness for various storm return periods was developed. Thus, values for c can
be determined using the following equations (Urbonas, Guo and Tucker 1990).
CA = KA + (1.31i' — 1.44/2 + 1.135i— 0.12) for CA ≥0, otherwise CA =0 (RO-6)
CCD = KCD + (0.858i' - 0.786i2 + 0.774i+ 0.04) (RO-7)
CB = (CA + CCDI/2
in which:
= °/0 imperviousness/100 expressed as a decimal (see Table RO-3)
06/2001 RO-9
Urban Drainage and Flood Control District A
DRAINAGE CRITERIA MANUAL (V. 1) RUNOFF
TABLE RO-5
Runoff Coefficients, C
Percentage
Imperviousness Type C and D NRCS Hydrologic Soil Groups
2-yr 5-yr 10-yr 25-yr 50-yr 100-yr
0% 0.04 0.15 0.25 0.37 0.44 0.50
5% 0.08 0.18 0.28 0.39 0.46 0.52
10% 0.11 0.21 0.30 0.41 0.47 0.53
15% 0.14 0.24 0.32 0.43 0.49 0.54
20% 0.17 0.26 0.34 0.44 0.50 0.55
25% 0.20 0.28 0.36 0.46 0.51 0.56
30% 0.22 0.30 0.38 0.47 0.52 0.57
35% 0.25 0.33 0.40 0.48 0.53 0.57
40% 0.28 0.35 0.42 0.50 0.54 0.58
45% 0.31 0.37 0.44 0.51 0.55 0.59
50% 0.34 0.40 0.46 0.53 0.57 0.60
55% 0.37 0.43 0.48 0.55 0.58 0.62
60% 0.41 0.46 0.51 0.57 0.60 0.63
65% 0.45 0.49 0.54 0.59 0.62 0.65
70% 0.49 0.53 , 0.57 0.62 0.65 0.68
75% 0.54 0.58 0.62 0.66 0.68 0.71
80% 0.60 0.63 0.66 0.70 0.72 0.74
85% 0.66 0.68 0.71 0.75 0.77 0.79
90% 0.73 0.75 0.77 0.80 0.82 0.83
95% 0.80 0.82 0.84 0.87 0.88 0.89
100% 0.89 0.90 0.92 0.94 0.95 0.96
Type B NRCS Hydrologic Soils Group
0% 0.02 0.08 0.15 0.25 0.30 0.35
5% 0.04 0.10 0.19 0.28 0.33 0.38
10% 0.06 0.14 0.22 0.31 0.36 0.40
15% 0.08 0.17 0.25 0.33 0.38 0.42
20% 0.12 0.20 0.27 0.35 0.40 0.44
25% 0.15 0.22 0.30 0.37 0.41 0.46
30% 0.18 0.25 0.32 0.39 0.43 0.47
35% 0.20 0.27 0.34 0.41 0.44 0.48
40% 0.23 0.30 0.36 0.42 0.46 0.50
45% 0.26 0.32 0.38 0.44 0.48 0.51
50% 0.29 0.35 0.40 0.46 0.49 0.52
55% 0.33 0.38 0.43 0.48 0.51 0.54
60% 0.37 0.41 0.46 0.51 0.54 0.56
65% 0.41 0.45 0.49 0.54 0.57 0.59
70% 0.45 0.49 0.53 0.58 0.60 0.62
75% 0.51 0.54 0.58 0.62 0.64 0.66
80% 0.57 0.59 0.63 0.66 0.68 0.70
85% 0.63 0.66 0.69 0.72 0.73 0.75
90% 0.71 0.73 0.75 0.78 0.80 0.81
95% 0.79 0.81 0.83 0.85 0.87 0.88
100% 0.89 0.90 0.92 0.94 0.95 0.96
06/2001 RO-11
Urban Drainage and Flood Control District
At
® ) { » \ /\
E ? _ k -5 /
E ® \ CE
vt-
.-
-S
Cr O
C t L\
� � \ §
� v H k N Cu®
LLI
\ & $ « ; $
F— co / gy m r
#a
/ t o ) \ N.
) > / >
e S - a ® a -
\ f k« co_ ) k« -
§ %3 e 4/ 2 co
I- 0 0
C ° a«
g }r # as ;
Ty ..=,..c
$ )—
% ) \� § ( w - §
k k � \/ § . { / / \ � .
#
} % ta _ U_
7 ) § / E % 2 ) § / J /
aa = ! , a = §
> _ ° > _ °iii) 23 » ° ) Zit ®
C 0 ) ' CtC a) )
k 0 0
\ co CO CO j to
` -
2 to In 8
$ t= #!
/ » a kJ ) 7
/ /
DRAINAGE CRITERIA MANUAL (V. 1) RUNOFF
50
30
I-
o
- 20 s 'v
_ Io a s
w f r
¢ *V ��0 w ...7
W • ,f y
a S.
et
1O 4V I y c
z o
J • or !f
a J=c 4' ,PW oe `tee y
f v
N 5 0�o a.
a i if f� 0 3
O
W
Wf rJ y4) , bt 40
f 2 Qf i.
Cl 3 r C Wf 0 WW
7 a, G I ¢ : N=
O 3 c
2tic ` e lye f
W Ise 1 t
I— Ce tf
Q 4 0
4W
It
1
.5 ► f
.1 .2 .3 .5 1 2 3 5 10 20
VELOCITY IN FEET PER SECOND
FIGURE RO-1
Estimate of Average Overland Flow Velocity for Use With the Rational Formula
06/2001 RO-13
Urban Drainage and Flood Control District
,-.. .--. Irt<
\P 561i
Peak Runoff Flowrates OS
7
5-Year Storm Runoff for Historic Conditions:
Design Runoff Time of Rainfall Area Runoff, Q
Basin Coefficient Concentration, Intensity
Point (C5) tc(minutes) (15) ( - (cfs)
1 Site 0.08 40 1.92 1 4.00 0.6
100-Year Storm Runoff for Historic Conditions:
Runoff Time of Rainf- I
Design Area unoff, Q
Point Basin Coefficient Concentration, Intens' y (acres) (cfs)
(C100) tc(minutes) (1100
1 Site 0.35 40 3.95 4.00 5.5
5-Year Storm Runoff for Proposed Conditions:
Design Runoff Time of Rainfall Area Runoff, Q
Point Basin Coefficient Concentration, Intensity (acres) (cfs)
(C5) te(minutes) (15)
1 Site 0.34 14 3.52 4.25 5.1
100-Year Storm Runoff for Proposed Conditions:
Design Runoff Time of Rainfall Area Runoff, Q
Point Basin Coefficient Concentration, Intensity (acres) (cfs)
(C100) t0(minutes) (Iwo)
1 A 0.53 14 6.57 4.25 14.8
King Contracting, Inc.
Laube Engineering, LLC Foster Equipment Company, Inc.
1/16/2007 A
al East of 12739 WCR 4, Brighton, Colorado
RAINFALL DRAINAGE CRITERIA MANUAL (V. 1)
R 71 W R 70 W R 69 W R 68 W R 67 W R 66 W R 65 W R 64 W R 63 W
1.3 1 41.45 1+
z .45 1.4 1.35 1.35 1.4
I1
F I LONGMONi I•
z /
z
NIWOT
•
.3
Z I I ri 111
0 I I z
0
1.2~ I
4
BRIGHT. • A0 5
cc
N o \ I N
O r ,-
m
BO I DER
JE EPSON / I J I
0 in
F 1 w o DENVER F
u. 1-- r
n �.../ n
1.1 .- 1.37 i-
I /
/ D •VER 1.39 AMS
ARA D AHOE
in
tn
1.0 • )l4
N ERG'EEN 1 u in
1� / 4
N in
W• F
\ U
A' •AHOE ARAPAHOE
0• GS ELBERT
ONIFER
•
a o PAR ER y
to
o
owm
tu
•
' SEDALIA vi
1.1 I-
X 1.39
1.0 1.2 1.3 FRNKT'W
1.4 1.4
R 71 W R 70 W R 69 W R 68 W R 67 W R 66 W R 65 W R 64 W R 63 W
FIGURE RA-2
Rainfall Depth-Duration-Frequency: 5-Year, 1-Hour Rainfall
RA-14 06/2001
AQ Urban Drainage and Flood Control District
U
RAINFALL DRAINAGE CRITERIA MANUAL(V. 1)
R 71 W R 70 W R 69 W R 68 W R 67 W R 66 W R 65 W R 64 W R 63 w
2.4 2.5 2.65 2.7 2.7 2.6i 2.65 2.7
2 6 LONOMONT z
\I \ ,
• \ / \
z
eg
nl NIWOi
J
2
II ^ 0
m
/ WELO
I BRIOHTO • -'DAMS
2.3
N o�
.- ms
:0 DER /
J F ER ON J 1 L
tn
N O / ry
1- < . —I ENVER F
1 s
An
/ in
2.2
Y l ADAMS
D VER ARAPAHOE
' 2.15 \
C
2.1� h r I z.7
• \
EVE EEN \ N
un
F \ .a ` -----2.65
I w
A• PAHOE ARAPAHOE
2.05 D 1,CL4S ELBERT
CONIFER
• PA•DER
I o
N. • ow
0m
Ln V. ` ow
\
2.05 6ED'
2.6
r FRANKTIWN F
\ •
2.5
2.1 2.15 2.2 2.3 2,4 2.`-5
R 71 W R 70 W R 69 W R 68 W R 67 w R 66 W R 65 W R 64 W R 63 W
FIGURE RA-6
Rainfall Depth-Duration-Frequency: 100-Year, 1-Hour Rainfall
RA-18 06/2001
Urban Drainage and Flood Control District
A9
Table 3.3. Extended Duration-Intensity-Frequency Tabulation, Greeley, Colorado.
r f, lc t aghr . . ; a. { c SrtormY?ewncy a ..
liaggibi {x2 yd`r^ •S3 yeaig:i:saftograi igiglpsrateoPivg4T100;yQar:
,..,,...k>. .»,,(mlkr),r ₹20Thr) > t (mlhr)' . Vri/hr) ,(. (iiiS ::s (frc(hr)
5 min 3.62 5.19 6.12 7.31 8.73 9.67 _
10 2.81 4.02 4.75 5.67 6.78 7.51 _
15 2.37 3.4 4.01 4.79 5.72 6.34
20 2 2.86 3.38 4.03 4.81 5.34
25 1.77 2.54 3 3.58 4.28 4.74
30 1.64 2.35 2.78 3.22 3.97 4.39
40 1.34 1.92 2.27 2.7 3.23 3.59
50 1.16 1.66 1.96 2.34 2.8 3.1
60 (1 hr) 1.04 1.49 1.76 2.1 2.51 2.78
•
80 0.8 1.14 1.47 1.61 1.91 2.16
100 0.67 0.94 1.2 1.3 1.58 1.79
120 (2 hr) 0.58 0.8 0.96 1.14 1.3 1.5
150 0.49 0.66 0.78 0.93 1.1 1.23
180 (3 hr) 0.42 0.56 0.67 0.8 0.92 1.05
4 hr 0.33 0.44 0.53 0.62 0.72 0.81
5 0.27 0.36 0.43 0.5 0.57 0.66
6 0.23 0.3 0.37 . 0.43 0.49 0.57
8 0.2 0.24 0.29 0.34 0.39 0.44
10 0.15 0.2 0.24 0.29 0.32 0.36
12 0.13 0.17 0.2 0.25 0.28 0.31
14 0.11 0.15 0.18 0.23 0.24 0.27
•
16 0.1 0.13 , 0.16 0.2 0.22 0.24
18 0.09 0.12 0.14 0.18 0.19 0.21
20 0.08 0.11 0.13 0.17 0.18 0.19
22 0.07 0.1 0.12 0.16 0.16 0.17
24 0,07 0.09 0.11 0.14 0.15 0.16
Aio
Retention Pond Infiltration Rate
Q = kiA k i A where:
Q = infiltration rate into bottom of pond
k = soil percolation rate
i = hydraulic gradient (assumed to be 1.0)
A = average area of pond bottom
k determined from soil percolation test performed at a depth of 2.5 feet
soil classification: poorly graded sand
k = 1.6 minutes per inch = 8.7 x 10'° ft/s
Assumed maximum area of pond bottom = 5,650 square feet
Q = KiA = 4.8cfs
King Contracting, Inc.
Laube Engineering, LLC Foster Equipment Company, Inc.
1/16/2007 East of 12739 WCR 4, Brighton, Colorado
AR
Retention Pond Sizing for 100-Year Storm Event
(Retention pond volume required for subject property)
Site Drainage Basin Area (area being detained) 4.250 acres
Time of Concentration tc 14 minutes
100-year Developed Runoff Coefficient, C100 0.53
Maximum release due to infiltration along bottom of pond (gout) 4.8 cfs
Rainfall 100-Year Inflow Average Outflow Storage Storage
Duration, t Rainfall Volume Outflow Volume Volume
Volume (ac-
Intensity,
out ) a,t ( 3) CIAt - Qa tt ft)
(minutes) CIAt (ft3) kQ cfs. kQ t ft (ft3)
1100 (in/hr)
5 9.67 6,516 4.8 1,436 5,081 0.117
10 7.51 10,121 4.8 2,871 7,250 0.166
15 6.34 12,817 4.8 4,307 8,510 0.195
20 5.34 14,394 4.8 5,742 8,652 0.199
25 4.74 15,970 4.8 7,178 8,793 0.202
30 4.39 17,749 4.8 8,613 9,136 0.210
35 3.94 18,585 4.8 10,049 8,536 0.196
40 3.59 19,353 4.8 11,484 7,869 0.181
45 3.32 20,135 4.8 12,920 7,215 0.166
50 3.10 20,890 4.8 14,355 6,535 0.150
55 2.93 21,718 4.8 15,791 5,928 0.136
60 2.78 22,480 4.8 17,226 5,254 0.121
70 2.42 22,830 4.8 20,097 2,733 0.063
80 2.15 23,181 4.8 22,968 213 0.005
90 1.94 23,531 4.8 25,839 -2,308 -0.053
100 1.76 23,720 4.8 28,710 -4,990 -0.115
120 1.50 24,259 4.8 34,452 -10,193 -0.234
Required Pond Volume = 1.5 x calculated volume = 13,705 ft3
King Contracting, Inc.
Laube Engineering, LLC Foster Equipment, Inc.
1/16/2007 \ 12. East of 12739 WCR 4, Brighton, Colorado
Retention Pond
Stage-Storage Table
Water Elevation 2 Cumulative
Depth (ft) (feet) Area (ft ) Volume (ft3)
0.00 91.50 0 0
0.50 92.00 1,472 245
1.50 93.00 2,636 2,271
2.50 94.00 4,030 5,580
3.30 94.80 5,523 9,385 100-year volume
3.50 95.00 6,048 10,542
4.10 95.60 6,981 14,447 1.5 times 100-yr volume
5.10 96.60 14,368 24,902 top of berm
Pond volume for 100-year storm = 9,136 ft3 (Elevation = 94.80)
1.5 times 100-year pond volume = 13,705 ft3 (Elevation = 95.60)
Pond berm elevation = 96.50
King Contracting, Inc.
Laube Engineering, LLC Foster Equipment Company, Inc.
1/16/2007 A 13 East of 12739 WCR 4, Brighton, Colorado
Normal Flow Analysis - Trapezoidal Channel
Project: Foster Equipment Company, Inc.
Channel ID: Swale through crushed recyiced asphalt parking/drive area
F n
X `
Y 1� e
y° / 1
Z1 a 13 Z2
Design Information (Input)
Channel Invert Slope So= 0.0067 fUft
Manning's n n= 0.025
Bottom Width B= r0.00ft
Left Side Slope Z1 = .10.00 ft/ft
Right Side Slope Z2= 10.00 ft/ft
Freeboard Height F= 0.00I ft
Design Water Depth Y= 0.77 ft
Normal Flow Condtion (Calculated'
Discharge Q= 15,26 cfs
Froude Number Fr= 0.73s
Flow Velocity V= ;" 2:57'fps
Flow Area A 5.93;sq ft
Top Width T=^ '',15.411 ft
Wetted Perimeter P :`,.15248 ft
Hydraulic Radius R= 0;381 ft
Hydraulic Depth D 0:39 ft
Specific Energy Es= 0.87:ft
Centroid of Flow Area Yo= 0.25;ft
Specific Force Fs= .;0.17'kip
UD-Channels Center of Lot 327.xls, Basics 8/16/2006, 12:37 PM
A1+
i iv]Y.1 rra m'—I aacaa Iwo nun :umY tau USW Hama Lm awe 00 YNYU4O1 pitsv OOTh0703 N'-4 miOIH p—� 'S
1 INI war woo I 3'Y/3AY NOSI01'N%fi yea 4�1NDfdOAi mutat 'wagOO OLcOg QNY
_ i I. w y... OTI 'omusammia Ea itl'I �I ItOYMlNOJ 9YIM ao► rat SEMI OW SSW =gum 'JMQY?7J in LA NIWA --
I Dart . :lJi^OW m � l m8 0 I1i! I ; ! : o
Y �e °l• a I I fill 5
!Li "
gpp 1
, t y. m is a„l I 1 • x 7 Q , 1 a �•
SE r bd mit ! � Ib I II � I l . .. . t ; Y!
g
; '
R $ WI A
a b ,a J S
II�e 6 � fi ma is fn " R ii ; iii ; B 9 IP I End - @ ■Io I
i v M
j Q G a tai - I
Y r e
r 1
m yC d al J8
O o TiIIdedd26i : Pf ` I lips m i iJIC
I Ili 1 111 1
al 1
iii ig I! 1; g
iC 4 ° �Ei :it
' t i
�'
VA
l 'a 11
t;•, �. 1 I
€ lExArt &M.a.441 I y
;-- ` k x x x�+ ti § 8e4 viu
JO
a I. �.
hi, Si 1 ' id 3a C ti2
i
y \ ,fr t r
@a : \ 1 go
U w � 1.1....)„,......./
d
C I I q r ea—
' .. �' � 1:1 ! lit
1 ₹4 rll ill
ail
N __ d _ zQ ll y
1, I /. .i I 1 'r• I Qj " vC
a 1 Q
AYrY
�lu�T�7 _ � m /� _ � f I s E _l_
4 . gr-Nl
\T1ç1
C� L. i 7 91sT a --- qq � 1
ii
- Ym E g CC_; 111
_I . aig , I
02.•.1'8
i MWWI MT YT�r / \ lip i c a
1 ��mi.." . Af�^�Y'�i..-v/ 14 - 1 I 1111
r iii
�ill
sF Ill i I 71
It
' 4 t Y"li
WYI rf !� u i 1• W
.
a pa
KIN
kCONTRACTING
300 Madison Avenue
Loveland, Colorado 80537
(970)669-3077
(970)669-2183 Fax
kci@frii.com
TRANSMITTAL
To: Weld County Dept. of Planning Submitted Via ■
Courier
Attn: Michelle Martin Mail
Fed Ex
Facsimile X
Date: January 25, 2007 Other
Transmitted For ■
Project: Foster Equipment Approval
SPR-407 Use on project
Your Files X
Enclosed: Dear Ms. Martin,
The engineer and architect has finished the revisions requested in your six
page review and the clarification and modifications from our meeting of last
week with the owner. Per your instructions enclosed is one review set. As
soon as you approve we will submit the required sets per your instructions.
The owners have already submitted to you by mail the letters requested.
Thank you and I appreciate your prompt review.
By: Randal F. King CC: Foster Equipment Company
President Attn: Neal Foster
(303) 659-5158
Stormwater Management Plan (SWMP)
Foster Equipment Company,Inc.
For property directly east of 12739 WCR 4, Brighton, Colorado
The SWMP was prepared in accordance with good engineering, hydrologic and pollution control
practices. The main objective of this plan is to identify Best Management Practices (BMP's)
which when implemented will meet the terms and conditions of the general permit.
The plan identifies potential sources of pollution, including sediment, which may reasonably be
expected to affect the quality of stormwater discharges associated with the construction activity
of this facility. In addition,the plan describes the implementation of BMP's which will be used
to reduce pollutants in stormwater discharge associated with the construction activity.
Construction operations must implement the provisions of the SWMP required under this part as
a condition of the permit.
1. Site Description
a) The planned construction activity consists of constructing an office and a shop building
and parking lot/drives. The construction activity will consist of grading to achieve desired
grades for the building, parking lot and driveways. The activity will also include the
construction of underground utilities and septic leach field. The finished construction will
include concrete pavement, concrete walks, gravel driveways and landscaped areas.
b) The proposed sequence for major activities is as follows:
• Installation of erosion control devices that will include excavation of the
stormwater retention pond to be used as a sediment basin during construction
activities.
• Topsoil stripping and subgrade preparation for cut and fill per the grading plan.
• The building pad will be prepared for foundation and slab-on-grade construction.
• Construction of underground utilities beginning with leach field and water lines,
followed by dry utilities.
• Placement of concrete pavement in parking areas and gravel in driveways.
• Landscaping
c) The total area of disturbance on the 4-acre site will be approximately 3.0 acres.
d) The estimated 100-year runoff coefficient for the site prior to construction is 0.35 and is
expected to be 0.53 after construction activities are completed. The percent impervious
before and after construction is estimated to be 30%and 42% respectively.
e) The site currently consists of a vacant property with crushed recycled asphalt surface.
f) We do not anticipate any other potential pollution sources
g) We do not anticipate any non-stormwater discharge from the site during construction.
h) The stormwater from this site will be routed to the proposed stormwater retention pond
located at the northeast corner of the property. Stormwater in the retention pond will be
released by infiltrating the sandy subgrade soils. The site and retention pond is located in
the South Platte River basin.
2. Site Map
Please refer to sheet C2 and C3 for the site map and SWMP and BMP specifics for this
project. These plans identify the area of disturbance, areas of cut and fill, and location of
erosion control devices. There are no existing springs, streams, wetlands, or other surface
waters on this site. The site is not located within the 100-year floodplain.
3. BMP's for Stormwater Pollution Prevention
a) Erosion and Sediment Controls
• Structural Practices
This project will utilize gravel and rock rip rap to minimize erosion.
• Non-structural Practices
Contractor is responsible for periodic inspection and maintenance of erosion
control devices.
b) Materials Handling and Spill Prevention
The contractor is responsible for identifying and specifying material handling and
spill prevention control to include, but not limited to, exposed materials such as
fertilizers, waste piles, and equipment maintenance and fueling areas.
4. Final Stabilization and Long term Stormwater Management
Final stabilization will be achieved by the final vegetative cover. The contractor will be
responsible for establishing healthy stands of grass and vegetative cover where specified. The
landscaped areas will be irrigated and will be maintained by the owner upon completion of
construction.
5. Other Controls
None.
6. Inspection and Maintenance
The contractor is responsible for the inspection and maintenance of erosion control devices.
LAUBE 6250 W 10th Street,Ste 3
Greeley,CO 80634-8856
ENGINEERING, LLC e-mail: laubeeng@qwest.net
Fax: (970)356-3143
Telephone: (970)356-3099
August 25, 2006 Project No.: 327
Randy King
King Contracting, Inc.
300 Madison Avenue
Loveland, CO 80537
Subject: Drainage Variance Request for Foster Equipment Company,Inc. Facility
Property located directly east of 12739 WCR 4
Brighton, Colorado
Dear Randy:
A variance is requested to the Weld County Code for a stormwater detention pond (Chapter 24-
7-130). Due to site characteristics, we recommend that a stormwater retention pond be
constructed, instead of a detention pond,to accommodate the proposed site improvements.
It is our opinion that it is not feasible to gravity drain a site stormwater detention pond because of
the existing watershed barriers, relatively flat topography, and no existing drainage systems. Due
to the native sandy subgrade soils in this area, a retention pond provides a good method to
manage stormwater runoff from the site. We recommend that the stormwater runoff from this
site be met by a stormwater retention pond.
It has been a pleasure being part of your project. If you have any questions, please call me at
(970) 356-3099.
Sincerely,
LAUBE ENGINEER
ING,ING, LLC
74,56*l//__ ''
Keith A. Laube, P.E.
Civil Engineer
Drainage Report for
Foster Equipment Company. Inc. Facility
Property Located Directly East of 12739 WCR 4
Brighton, Colorado
Prepared For:
King Contracting, Inc
300 Madison Avenue
Loveland, CO 80537
Prepared By:
Laube Engineering, LLC
6250 W 10th Street, Ste 3
Greeley, CO 80634
(970) 356-3099
Project No. 327
October 12, 2006
Revised January 16, 2007
00,
LAUBE 6250 W 10th Street,Ste 3
Greeley,CO 80634-8856
ENGINEERING, LLC e-mail: laubeeng@qwest.net
Fax: (970)356-3143
Telephone: (970)356-3099
January 16, 2007 Project No.: 327
Randy King
King Contracting, Inc.
300 Madison Avenue
Loveland, CO 80537
Subject: Drainage Report for Foster Equipment Company, Inc. Facility
Property located directly east of 12739 WCR 4
Brighton, Colorado
Dear Randy:
This resubmittal is a drainage study for the proposed development. The redesigned retention
pond is smaller and deeper than the original design. Parking, driving, and displays are not
included in the area of the new pond. Since the pond bottom will not be used for display and
parking, the calculation to check the pond volume assuming no infiltration is not necessary.
A variance to Weld County Code Chapter 24-7-130 will be required because a stormwater
retention pond (release by infiltration into the subgrade soils) has been designed instead of a
detention pond (release to an existing drainage system).
It has been a pleasure being part of your project. If you have any questions, please call me at
(970) 356-3099.
Sincerely,
LAUBE ENGINEERING, LLC
Keith A. Laube, P.E.
Civil Engineer
Table of Contents
Engineer Certification
General Location and Description
Site Location 1
Project Description 1
Drainage Basin and Site Design Information 1
Drainage Basin 1
Site Drainage 1
Adjacent Site Drainage Conditions 1
Site Flood Hazard 1
Soil and Groundwater Conditions 2
Drainage Design Criteria 2
Storm Drainage Criteria 2
Development Criteria References and Constraints 2
Hydrological Criteria 2
Hydraulic Criteria 2
Drainage Facility Design 2
General Concept 2
Specific Details 3
Erosion Control 3
Conclusions 3
Appendix A—Runoff and Detention Volume Calculations 4
ENCLOSURES: 11" x 17"Drainage, Grading and Erosion Control Plan
Laube Engineering, LLC
Drainage Report
Foster Equipment Company, Inc.
New Office/Shop Building
Page i
Engineer Certification
I hereby certify that this report for the drainage design for the Foster Equipment Company, Inc.
property located directly east of 12739 Weld County Road 4, Brighton, Colorado was prepared
by me (or under my direct supervision) in accordance with the provisions of the Weld County
Storm Drainage Criteria for the owners thereof.
OQP1/40 AREA/`s2�
U,4i � '� t
i 31874 m:
Keith A. Laube, P.E.
Registered Professional Engineer
State of Colorado No. 31874
Laube Engineering, LLC
Drainage Report
Foster Equipment Company, Inc.
New Office/Shop Building
Page 1
General Location and Description
Site Location
The site is located in the southeast quarter of Section 30, Township 1 North, Range 66 West of
the 6th P.M. in Weld County, Colorado. More specifically, the site is located on the north side
of WCR 4, approximately '/ miles east of U.S. Highway 85 and about 400 feet west of Weld
County Road 27. The Fulton Lateral Ditch extends along the east side of Weld County Road 27
and the Union Pacific Railroad is located approximately 200 feet east of Weld County Road 27.
A large pond left from a sand/gravel pit operation is located northwest of the site.
In general, land within the site vicinity is industrial. The existing Foster Equipment Company is
located on the property west of the site and Tri County Parts and Equipment is located along
the south side of Weld County Road 4. The land east of the site is vacant and a few residential
homes are located further east of the site. A former sand and gravel pit operated on land north
and northwest of the site.
Project Description
The property is 4.0 acres and presently consists of crushed recycled asphalt surface. The project
will consist of constructing a 5,400 ft2 office building and a 6,000 ft2 shop building. Paved
parking and drives are planned along south and east sides of the office building. Access to the
lot will remain from Weld County Road 4.
Drainage Basin and Site Design Information
Drainage Basin
The site is located in the South Platte River basin. The South Platte River is located
approximately %1 miles west of the site. In general, drainage within the site vicinity flows
northwest to the South Platte River.
Site Drainage
The site is located between two drainage barriers. U.S. Highway 85 extends in a north-south
direction west of the site and the Union Pacific Railroad extends in a north-south direction east
of the site. The site currently drains north. The topography of the site slopes to the north at
about 0.5%with a total relief of about 1 foot across the site.
Adjacent Site Drainage Conditions
The site receives off-site flows from the north half of Weld County Road 4, extending for the
property frontage. The retention pond has been designed to accommodate this off-site runoff.
Site Flood Hazard
The site is in a flood zone "C" according to the Flood Insurance Rate Map (Community Panel
Number 080266 0995C) dated September 28, 1982. The flood zone "C" designation includes
areas of minimal flooding.
Laube Engineering LLC
Drainage Report
Foster Equipment Company, Inc.
New Office/Shop Building
Page 2
Soil and Groundwater Conditions
Soil information was been obtained from the Soil Survey for Weld County. The Soil Survey
indicates Altvan soil type on the site. The Altvan soils are poorly graded sands that are
classified as Hydrologic Group B.
Drainage Design Criteria
Storm Drainage Criteria
This drainage report was prepared to conform to the Weld County criteria and the Urban Storm
Drainage Criteria Manuals (Volumes 1 and 2 issued June 2001 and Volume 3 issued September
1999), prepared by the Denver Urban Drainage and Flood Control District.
Development Criteria References and Constraints
Site grading was performed to match existing grades where appropriate. Proposed site grades
match existing grades at property lines. Due to the existing watershed barriers and relatively
flat topography within the site vicinity, it is our opinion that it is not feasible to gravity drain a
site detention pond. Since the native sandy soils provide good infiltration rates, a site retention
pond has been designed for the proposed development.
Hydrological Criteria
Stormwater runoff was analyzed using the Rational Method, which is considered acceptable for
sites less than 160 acres. Using the Urban Storm Drainage Criteria Manual, the 100-year one-
hour rainfall for this area is 2.6 inches. The 100-year one-hour rainfall for Greeley is 2.78
inches, slightly more than the subject site. Because the Greeley rainfall values are tabulated, the
rainfall intensity data used for this site is from the City of Greeley Storm Drainage Manual
(Table 3.3). Using the Greeley rainfall data will provide conservative runoff rates and pond
volume. Drainage calculations and referenced information is included in the appendices. The
drainage structures on the site have been designed for a minor storm with a 5-year return period
and a major storm with a 100-year return period.
Hydraulic Criteria
The FAA Method, as described in Volume 2 of the Urban Storm Drainage Criteria Manual,
was used to calculate the pond volume. The retention pond volume has been sized based on 1.5
times the capacity required for the 100-year storm event for the developed conditions plus 1-
foot freeboard.
Drainage Facility Design
General Concept
The proposed grading tries to minimize the amount of disturbance to the land while providing a
site plan that provides adequate drainage for the proposed development. Stormwater runoff will
sheet flow northeast across the site to the proposed retention pond. A gentle drainage swale
runs through the center of the crushed recycled asphalt surface to convey runoff from the paved
parking areas to the proposed retention pond. Runoff coefficients have been calculated using
proposed surfaces.
Laube Engineering, LLC
Drainage Report
Foster Equipment Company, Inc.
New Office/Shop Building
Page 3
Specific Details
A soil percolation test performed west of the proposed shop building yielded a percolation rate
of 1.6 minutes per inch. Using a percolation rate at 1.6 minutes per inch, the infiltration rate
through the 5,650 ft2 pond bottom is 4.4 cfs. Using an outflow of 4.8 cfs, the pond volume to
store the 100-year storm is 9,136 ft3. The retention pond has been designed to retain 13,705 ft3
(1.5 times the volume required for the 100-year storm event)plus 1-foot freeboard (this follows
the recommendation for retention ponds -Volume 2, USDCM).
The bottom of the retention pond is at elevation 91.5 and the top of the pond is at elevation
96.6. The retention pond drain time for the 100-year storm event is estimated to be about 2 to 4
hours. The drainage easement shown on the plans includes the pond area required to hold 1.5
times the 100-year storm event with 1-foot of freeboard.
Because a feasible discharge location for emergency flows is not available, an emergency
spillway has not been designed. Since the pond does not have a built-up berm, it is our opinion
that an emergency spillway is not needed to maintain the integrity of the pond.
Erosion Control
Erosion control during construction of the project should consist of installing silt fence along
the east and north property lines adjacent to the proposed retention pond. The retention pond
should be constructed as a sediment basin prior to other earthwork operations. We recommend
that the construction access drive be the existing gated access. Since the existing site surface is
crushed recycled asphalt and no earthwork is planned near the east access, it is our opinion that
vehicle tracking control is not necessary. We suggest seeding proposed grass areas and placing
crushed recycled asphalt in drive/storage areas upon completion of grading.
Conclusions
This drainage design conforms to the Weld County stormwater drainage criteria.
Laube Engineering, LLC
Appendix A—Runoff and Detention Volume Calculations
Site Location Map (8'h"x 11") Al
Stormwater Runoff Coefficient A2
Table RO-3 Imperviousness Values A3
Table RO-5 Runoff Coefficients A4
Time of Concentration A5
Figure RO-1 Average Overland Flow Velocity A6
Peak Runoff Flowrates A7
Figure RA-2 Rainfall Depth-Duration-Frequency: 5-Year, 1-Hour Rainfall A8
Figure RA-6 Rainfall Depth-Duration-Frequency: 100-Year, 1-Hour Rainfall A9
Table 3.3 —Extended Duration-Intensity-Frequency Tabulation, Greeley, Colorado.....A10
Retention Pond Infiltration Rate All
Retention Pond Sizing During the 100-Year Storm Event Al2
Retention Pond Stage-Storage Table A13
Drainage swale through crushed asphalt parking/drive area to the retention pond A 14
Laube Engineering, LLC
Site Location Map
N
Foster Equipment Company, Inc. Facility
Property East of 12739 WCR 4
Brighton, Colorado
1. J
_ I O
j Jy�r�
• 4935ll BM I �— �• 2 ( • i .
• I ' 4938 1
F493° �� .l� (c/Kr
V( Well,__ '— 1� __- � � I _
�, ° ) I' • t Si
�d940 ��
Grain ,,,((( /
/ •.l'_Eleda[�r� Feedlot/ %
L
19� °Wen �.. 20 ___—ThZ 1
• • • l� __ i sosa_
(( --/------31 /(\ \ \ �
able b Independence a
P rk School i1 r'
�� • —A� \ ••°Well • BhI 1 ••) A 500, A , .
4926 G9G> 4950
° o 'Water _ G999 '____ 1 \�
/II J Tank \--�(�
o Radl• r. � 7 •
— Ilso<
Tows /�. • 1
9 ( - � �� Slte ;
28
{
Xr.vel ' its I�� I CIT
• 4958 ��i .1 4 4 • • • ;500z C2 C+ .•.t , I r 496t 4999 �✓_/
•
•
°Well •31i11 /. ../•M1 4 �i 3
,I 2 I so
_ 33
so
1• il
�. Racetrack I
Lk4L. Cr
'••
5
AI
STORM RUNOFF COEFFICIENT, C
Historic Site Conditions:
s Percent Weighted r Weighted r Weighted
Surface Area (ft ) Impervious C5 Average C70 Average C7°° Average
grass/landscape 174,034 0 0.08 0.08 0.15 0.15 0.35 0.35
gravel - 40 0.30 0.00 0.36 0.00 0.50 0.00
roofs - 90 0.73 0.00 0.75 0.00 0.81 0.00
Total 174,034 Avg=0% C5 = 0.08 C10 = 0.15 C100 = 0.35
Proposed Conditions for Basin A plus north half of WCR 4 R.O.W.:
Percent Weighted Weighted Weighted
Surface Area (ft2) Impervious C5 Average C1° Average C+oo Average
grass/landscape 29,833 0 0.08 0.01 0.15 0.02 0.35 0.06
gravel/crushed asphalt 123,843 40 0.30 0.20 0.36 0.24 0.50 0.33
roofs 11,400 90 0.73 0.04 0.75 0.05 0.81 0.05
concrete/asphalt 20,058 90 0.73 0.08 0.75 0.08 0.81 0.09
Total 185,134 Avg=42% C5 = 0.34 C10 = 0.39 C100 = 0.53
Runoff Coefficient(C) based on Hydrologic Soil Group B (per Weld County Soil Survey)
King Contracting, Inc.
Laube Engineering, LLC Foster Equipment Company, Inc
1/16/2007 East of 12739 WCR 4, Brighton, Colorado
DRAINAGE CRITERIA MANUAL ✓. 1) RUNOFF
TABLE RO-3
Recommended Percentage Imperviousness Values
Land Use or Percentage
Surface Characteristics Imperviousness
Business:
Commercial areas 95
Neighborhood areas 85
Residential:
Single-family *
Multi-unit(detached) 60
Multi-unit(attached) 75
Half-acre lot or larger
Apartments 80
Industrial:
Light areas 80
Heavy areas 90
Parks, cemeteries 5
Playgrounds 10
Schools 50
Railroad yard areas 15
Undeveloped Areas:
Historic flow analysis 2
Greenbelts, agricultural 2
Off-site flow analysis 45
(when land use not defined)
Streets:
Paved 100
Gravel (packed) 40
Drive and walks 90
Roofs 90
Lawns, sandy soil 0
Lawns, clayey soil 0
* See Figures RO-3 through RO-5 for percentage imperviousness.
Based in part on the data collected by the District since 1969, an empirical relationship between C and
the percentage imperviousness for various storm return periods was developed. Thus, values for C can
be determined using the following equations (Urbonas, Guo and Tucker 1990).
CA =KA + (1.31i' —1.44i2 + 1.135i—0.12)for CA≥0, otherwise CA =0 (RO-6)
CCD = KCD + (0.858i' - 0.786i2 + 0.774i+ 0.04) (RO-7)
CB =(CA + CCD)/2
in which:
= % imperviousness/100 expressed as a decimal (see Table RO-3)
06/2001 RO-9
Urban Drainage and Flood Control DIstrict
3
DRAINAGE CRITERIA MANU, (V. 1) RUNOFF
TABLE RO-5
Runoff Coefficients, C
Percentage
Imperviousness Type C and D NRCS Hydrologic Soil Groups
2-yr 5-yr 10-yr 25-yr 50-yr 100-yr
0% 0.04 0.15 0.25 0.37 0.44 0.50
5% 0.08 0.18 0.28 0.39 0.46 0.52
10% 0.11 0.21 0.30 0.41 0.47 0.53
15% 0.14 0.24 0.32 0.43 0.49 0.54
20% 0.17 0.26 0.34 0.44 0.50 0.55
25% 0.20 0.28 0.36 0.46 0.51 0.56
30% 0.22 0.30 0.38 0.47 0.52 0.57
35% 0.25 0.33 0.40 0.48 0.53 0.57
40% 0.28 0.35 0.42 0.50 0.54 0.58
45% 0.31 0.37 0.44 0.51 0.55 0.59
50% 0.34 0.40 0.46 0.53 0.57 0.60
55% 0.37 043 0.48 0.55 0.58 0.62
60% 0.41 0.46 0.51 0.57 0.60 0.63
65% 0.45 0.49 0.54 0.59 0.62 0.65
70% 0.49 0.53 0.57 0.62 0.65 0.68
75% 0.54 0.58 0.62 0.66 0.68 0.71
80% 0.60 0.63 0.66 0.70 0.72 0.74
85% 0.66 0.68 0.71 0.75 0.77 0.79
90% 0.73 0.75 0.77 0.80 0.82 0.83
95% 0.80 0.82 0.84 0.87 0.88 0.89
100% 0.89 0.90 0.92 0.94 0.95 0.96
Type B NRCS Hydrologic Soils Group
0% 0.02 0.08 0.15 0.25 0.30 0.35
5% 0.04 0.10 0.19 0.28 0.33 0.38
10% 0.06 0.14 0.22 0.31 0.36 0.40
15% 0.08 0.17 0.25 0.33 0.38 0.42
20% 0.12 0.20 0.27 0.35 0.40 0.44
25% 0.15 0.22 0.30 0.37 0.41 0.46
30% 0.18 0.25 0.32 0.39 0.43 0.47
35% 0.20 0.27 0.34 0.41 0.44 0.48
40% 0.23 . 0.30 0.36 0.42 0.46 0.50
45% 0.26 0.32 0.38 0.44 0.48 0.51
50% 0.29 0.35 0.40 0.46 0.49 0.52
55% 0.33 0.38 0.43 0.48 0.51 0.54
60% 0.37 0.41 0.46 0.51 0.54 0.56
65% 0.41 0.45 0.49 0.54 0.57 0.59
70% 0.45 0.49 0.53 0.58 0.60 0.62
75% 0.51 0.54 0.58 0.62 0.64 0.66
80% 0.57 0.59 0.63 0.66 0.68 0.70
85% 0.63 0.66 0.69 0.72 0.73 0.75
90% 0.71 0.73 0.75 0.78 0.80 0.81
95% 0.79 0.81 0.83 0.85 0.87 0.88
100% 0.89 0.90 0.92 0.94 0.95 0.96
06/2001 RO-11
Urban Drainage and Flood Control District
4
r 4- t; ()
® J \ Ee
E Z _ 0 — c
E ® \ E / j
-
T3g3 -C �\
C -5
)
RU- CN1
{ ■ H E N \
uJ
Tv
) k -
» #_
k / o k3ci
) « — ) « —
LI
-a _ _ �
\ ) }) [ ) k) n
4270 ! %/ § »« [ ?
C ay a>
§ $ — % $ — ;
O
Tv 7cV
% § ) � 2 ( ) 2
/ ( - k / § \ � \ /
. # . &
! — —
= ® t ) — _ Li ® tks
7 / J \ R \ 7 \ ) % ® /
` 0 & 0
la •® 0) ® [R
] 2e � a ] 7e ~ ®
] _/« / f �« /
a . B O
o + v « <
Fl
k ) 2 so
G 2 -
2 on a 2 }
± ] e a. \0 -Jr
/ /
DRAINAGE CRITERIA MANUAL W. 1) RUNOFF
50
30
03
t�
tWW D Imp 8# aW!
¢ °✓
W • `f ib 0
d 10 ! C 3
2 A. a f 3
bv. •„ al
ip 3f fp
J
W Ov 0 W o ! bi
o. of I o! o! .�
N 5 pap J 4f faW 3f Y
a. e 0 3
W fa 4 bb a bes 1/4
-4
0 cc 3 r 1 p!f Er paf W
n r.: a ti ib iW
O 3 O I pQ h
CC 2 a '...°I Ia Wf
NIIt
I- aW . •
e O
aW
1 of
.5 i i
.1 .2 .3 .5 1 2 3 5 10 20
VELOCITY IN FEET PER SECOND
FIGURE RO-1
Estimate of Average Overland Flow Velocity for Use With the Rational Formula
06/2001 RO-13
Urban Drainage and Flood Control District
Peak Runoff Flowrates
5-Year Storm Runoff for Historic Conditions:
Runoff Time of Rainfall
Design
Basin Coefficient Concentration, Intensity Area Runoff, Q
Point (acres) (cfs)
(C5) t. (minutes) (15)
1 Site 0.08 40 1.92 4.00 0.6
100-Year Storm Runoff for Historic Conditions:
Design Runoff Time of Rainfall Area Runoff, Q
Basin Coefficient Concentration, Intensity
Point
(C100) to(minutes) (loo) (acres) (cfs)
1 Site 0.35 40 3.95 4.00 5.5
5-Year Storm Runoff for Proposed Conditions:
Design Runoff Time of Rainfall Area Runoff, Q
Point Basin Coefficient Concentration, Intensity (acres) (cfs)
(C5) to(minutes) (15)
1 Site 0.34 14 3.52 4.25 5.1
100-Year Storm Runoff for Proposed Conditions:
Design Runoff Time of Rainfall Area Runoff, Q
Point Basin Coefficient Concentration, Intensity (acres) (cfs)
(C100) tc(minutes) (Iwo)
1 A 0.53 14 6.57 4.25 14.8
King Contracting, Inc.
Laube Engineering, LLC Foster Equipment Company, Inc.
1/16/2007 A7 East of 12739 WCR 4, Brighton, Colorado
RAINFALL DRAINAGE URITERIA MANUAL(V. 1)
R 71 W R 70 W R 69 W R 68 W R 67 W R 66 W R 65 W R 64 W R 63 W
1.3 1 41.45 1.45 1.4 1.35 1.35 1.4
I I /7
F I LONGMONT I n
• ( n
I
z I I
z
N
F I NIWOT
J .3
7
-
- J
O_ 2
m� 1
1.2~ I
WE
BRIGHT h • AD S
I- W I I
m
BO I OER
JE ERSON
- / I J I
J-ou
/ tn
N
I... i� p / DENVER
/I f� I 0
n n
1.1 " 1.37 - -
1.39 ADAMS
/
I ' D •VER ARAPAHOE m
a
e
1.0••••.. • )�4
ERG EEN LJ O LL1.4
cn
A PAHOE ARAPAHOE
0 GLAS ELBERT
ONIFER .1 •
N • in
to
PAR ERg yy
• o w ,
o CD
w
•
In
SEDALIA tn
X 1.39
1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 FRANKT W
1.4 1.4
R 71 W R 70 W R 69 W R 68 W R 67 W R 66 W R 65 W R 64 W R 63 W
FIGURE RA-2
Rainfall Depth-Duration-Frequency: 5-Year, 1-Hour Rainfall
RA-14 06/2001
AQ Urban Drainage and Flood Control District
U
. ' RAINFALL DRAINAGE CF...cRIA MANUAL (V. 1)
R 71 W R 70 W R 69 W R 68 W R 67 W R 66 W R 65 W R 64 W R 63 W
2.4 2.5 .65 2.7 2.7 2.6j 2.65 2.7
z 1t
n 2 6 LONGMONT z in
• \ I
ty
.- I cy
NIWOT•
1
z
tELD
2 3 r9 B�HTO • DAMS in
~
rc
a I0i DER m a
JEER ONo r
Q N / in
N
ENVER
g
/
in
in
in
,r.�t�� / ADAMS
m „ D' VER ARAPAHOE
in
* 2.15 \ J F
2.12.7
EVE c EEN
in
in
wa2.65 "'
\\ ► A PAHOE ARAPAHOE
2.05 D CONIFER I,c,
' � GIPS ELBERT
'a PA+,ER
a
m
` g rcto
w
/ \\ o
A
\
n 2.05 SEDALIA in
-, FRANKT WN 2.6
F
2.5
R 71 W1 R 70 W15 R 69 W2.2 3 '4R 68 W R 67 W R 66 W R 65 W R 64 W R 63 W
FIGURE RA-6
Rainfall Depth-Duration-Frequency: 100-Year, 1-Hour Rainfall
RA-18
06/2001
FlUrban Drainage and Flood Control District
Table 3.3. Extended Duration-Intensity-Frequency Tabulation, Greeley, Colorado.
ili§tortiMo
Duration< L-yegs " �; year • 10 year 25 year 50-year 100 year
E' $"
„M.tinlfirl..�•- .,fl ihr) (inlhr) (in1) (i17EhL)' (in )
5 min 3.62 5.19 6.12 7.31 8.73 9.67
10 2.81 4.02 4.75 5.67 6.78 7.51
15 2.37 3.4 4.01 4.79 5.72 6.34
20 2 2.86 3.38 4.03 4.81 5.34
25 1.77 2.54 3 3.58 4.28 4.74
30 1.64 2.35 2.78 3.22 3.97 4.39
40 1.34 1.92 2.27 2.7 3.23 3.59
50 1.16 1.66 1.96 2.34 2.8 3.1
60 (1 hr) 1.04 1.49 1.76 2.1 2.51 2.78
80 0.8 1.14 1.47 1.61 1.91 2.16
100 0.67 0.94 1.2 1.3 1.58 1.79
120 (2 hr) 0.58 0.8 0.96 1.14 1.3 1.5
150 0.49 0.66 0.78 0.93 1.1 1.23
180 (3 lu) 0.42 0.56 0.67 0.8 0.92 1.05
4 hr 0.33 0.44 0.53 0.62 0.72 0.81
5 0.27 0.36 0.43 0.5 0.57 0.66
6 0.23 0.3 0.37 . 0.43 0.49 0.57
8 0.2 0.24 0.29 0.34 0.39 0.44
10 0.15 0.2 0.24 0.29 0.32 0.36
12 0.13 0.17 0.2 0.25 0.28 0.31
14 0.11 0.15 0.18 0.23 0.24 0.27
•
16 0.1 0.13 , 0.16 0.2 0.22 0.24
18 0.09 0.12 0.14 0.18 0.19 0.21
20 0.08 0.11 0.13 0.17 0.18 0.19
22 0.07 0.1 0.12 0.16 0.16 0.17
24 0.07 0.09 0.11 0.14 0.15 0.16
Retention Pond Infiltration Rate
Q = kiA k i A where:
Q = infiltration rate into bottom of pond
k = soil percolation rate
i = hydraulic gradient (assumed to be 1.0)
A = average area of pond bottom
k determined from soil percolation test performed at a depth of 2.5 feet
soil classification: poorly graded sand
k = 1.6 minutes per inch = 8.7 x 10-0 ft/s
Assumed maximum area of pond bottom = 5,650 square feet
Q = KiA = 4.8cfs
King Contracting, Inc.
Laube Engineering, LLC Foster Equipment Company, Inc.
1/16/2007 East of 12739 WCR 4, Brighton, Colorado
All
Retention Pond Sizing for 100-Year Storm Event
(Retention pond volume required for subject property)
Site Drainage Basin Area (area being detained) 4.250 acres
Time of Concentration to 14 minutes
100-year Developed Runoff Coefficient, C100 0.53
Maximum release due to infiltration along bottom of pond (Qo„t) 4.8 cfs
Rainfall 100-Year Inflow Average Outflow Storage Storage
e
Rainfall Volume g
Duration, t Volume Outflow Volume Volume (ac-
minutes Intensity, CIAt - kQ t
(minutes) lion (in/hr) CIAt (ft3) kQout (cfs). kQoutt (ft3) (ft3) «t ft)
5 9.67 6,516 4.8 1,436 5,081 0.117
10 7.51 10,121 4.8 2,871 7,250 0.166
15 6.34 12,817 4.8 4,307 8,510 0.195
20 5.34 14,394 4.8 5,742 8,652 0.199
25 4.74 15,970 4.8 7,178 8,793 0.202
30 4.39 17,749 4.8 8,613 9,136 0.210
35 3.94 18,585 4.8 10,049 8,536 0.196
40 3.59 19,353 4.8 11,484 7,869 0.181
45 3.32 20,135 4.8 12,920 7,215 0.166
50 3.10 20,890 4.8 14,355 6,535 0.150
55 2.93 21,718 4.8 15,791 5,928 0.136
60 2.78 22,480 4.8 17,226 5,254 0.121
70 2.42 22,830 4.8 20,097 2,733 0.063
80 2.15 23,181 4.8 22,968 213 0.005
90 1.94 23,531 4.8 25,839 -2,308 -0.053
100 1.76 23,720 4.8 28,710 -4,990 -0.115
120 1.50 24,259 4.8 34,452 -10,193 -0.234
Required Pond Volume = 1.5 x calculated volume = 13,705 ft3
King Contracting, Inc.
Laube Engineering, LLC Foster Equipment, Inc.
1/16/2007 A 12 East of 12739 WCR 4, Brighton, Colorado
Retention Pond
Stage-Storage Table
Water Elevation Area z) Cumulative
(ft
Depth (ft) (feet) Volume (ft3)
0.00 91.50 0 0
0.50 92.00 1,472 245
1.50 93.00 2,636 2,271
2.50 94.00 4,030 5,580
3.30 94.80 5,523 9,385 100-year volume
3.50 95.00 6,048 10,542
4.10 95.60 6,981 14,447 1.5 times 100-yr volume
5.10 96.60 14,368 24,902 top of berm
Pond volume for 100-year storm = 9,136 ft3 (Elevation = 94.80)
1.5 times 100-year pond volume = 13,705 ft3 (Elevation = 95.60)
Pond berm elevation = 96.50
King Contracting, Inc.
Laube Engineering, LLC Foster Equipment Company, Inc.
1/16/2007 A 13 East of 12739 WCR 4, Brighton, Colorado
Normal Flow Analysis - Trapezoidal Channel
Project: Foster Equipment Company, Inc.
Channel ID: Swale through crushed recylced asphalt parking/drive area
F
n /
Y \I < Yo
• VYo
Z1 c 13 Z2
besign Information(Input)
Channel Invert Slope So= 0.0067 ft/ft
Manning's n n= 0.025
Bottom Width B= 0.00 ft
Left Side Slope Z1 = !£ 10.00 ft/ft
Right Side Slope Z2= 10.00 ft/ft
Freeboard Height F= 0.00 ft
Design Water Depth Y= 0.77 ft
Normal Flow Condtion(Calculated'
Discharge Q= 15.26 cfs
Froude Number Fr= 0.73
Flow Velocity V= 2.57 fps
Flow Area A= 5.93'sq ft
Top Width T= 15.4O.ft
Wetted Perimeter P= 15.48 ft
Hydraulic Radius R= 0,38 ft
Hydraulic Depth D= 0,39'ft
Specific Energy Es= 0,87'ft
Centroid of Flow Area Yo= 0.25 ft
Specific Force Fs= 017 kip
UD-Channels Center of Lot 327.xls, Basics 8/16/2006, 12:37 PM
A14-
- v
arvorooWnriz
1 vv awe v a. any wcw wtw ION w •ur t w WW1 ww m an MO�'IN���03 'ON73A07 #v 0
MI r.ww' AM
YN N06u0M 0w ya 1 uppx)lIIDIdOM gum J1% i& 0ig?r ataa a m
iir I oil. Ili
.CI is ic..9,ik 1!1; k 5 a i a
a ! ill % la)i
01 ci! 6 a * I l ; si I; 2
I ii
iis , `1 c�
2j g j •
ii a ngg R wi 6 i F t zi FF hls ' W 'S
J a i a
w g 8 aiii ! iIt
of dflD ! fflI
l¢ Jq � {y, liW(n R 4 kti L. P I-" ❑ i
M GI -Jo
i 1
YC d ! I
' c I' ) ; I � I. I. � mil MI Si � S ! � i a = 1
ii
1I I � �° 1 " "
\ iii:1 i " I
ii.il '•' � a
a i a 1O 5
'� 1 :ii - i rz j
at SS 1yz-.7
' Ia$ E ! di::
4 li
i• Ed i4V
X—%—, %� I I O kg N 6
J 1 �u
l�S i a ` is iE I.I EW
ftL1
p i
I
gel
.‘ 1,...6 Y .
1 ' ' 1•
MEP/14
IIIy1 i "to
i 1 ) y a,iL I i� � � i _ I � ill
i ur
4
G N�
1 4 " i.. 1 r."— - §F
�I I I '4I 1
_. I I. F
.11 a
4\T7 '
wwn uaan nu N , , ..
1. _ � i x-li 7-` 1 r Ii
I I ! I I I ii II .4 4 'ii "� ; T.-
i WYIWWa� \ m1 ill
I i itYI PLII lOn1 Y�) N
\ 77Ati.srs �--'L Li1'in-AJ -Y--- - III 1 ! E.at ..n.mww ill ..- I t-i � a.s.
ret. ii:1 ____ Ty ' :1
i \ i 1
st..21 i 1 .
la i: 11 :i .
�i
~`�w i a i jai '.1 ti•
REFERRAL LIST
Name: Neal and Judith Ft r Case#: SPR-407
County Towns & Cities Fire Districts
_Attorney _Ault _Ault F-1
0 Health Department _Berthoud _Berthoud F-2
_Extension Office 0 Brighton _Briggsdale F-24
_Emergency Mgt Office- Ed Herring _Dacono 0 Brighton F-3
0 Sheriffs Office _Eaton _Eaton F-4
0 Public Works _Erie _Fort Lupton F-5
_Housing Authority _Evans _Galeton F-6
_Airport Authority _Firestone _Hudson F-7
0 Building Inspection 0 Fort Lupton _Johnstown F-8
0 Code Compliance_AnnJ Beth _Frederick _LaSalle F-9
Kim Ogle (Landscape Plans) _Garden City _Mountain View F-10
_Lin (Addressing Change of Zone) _Gilcrest _Milliken F-11
_0_Ambulance Services _Greeley _Nunn F-12
_Grover _Pawnee F-22
State _Hudson _Platteville F-13
0 Div. of Water Resources _Johnstown _Platte Valley F-14
_Geological Survey _Keenesburg _Poudre Valley F-15
_Department of Health _Kersey Raymer F-2
0 Department of Transportation _LaSalle _Southeast Weld F-16
_Historical Society 0 Lochbuie _Union Colony F-20
_Water Conservation Board _Longmont _Wiggins F-18
_Oil & Gas Conservation Commission _Mead _Windsor/Severance F-17
_Milliken
Division of Wildlife _New Raymer
0 South Hwy 66 (Loveland) _Northglenn
_North Hwy 66 (Greeley) _Nunn
Division of Minerals/Geology _Pierce Commissioner
_Platteville
Soil Conservation Districts _Severance
_Big Thompson/ FTC _Thornton
_Boulder Valley/Longmont _Windsor
_Brighton/SE Weld
_Centennial Counties
Greeley/West Greeley 0 Adams
_Platte Valley _Boulder
0_W est Adams _Broomfield
_Little Thompson _Larimer
Federal Government Agencies Other
_US Army Corps of Engrs 0 School District RE-27J
USDA-APHIS Vet Service _Central Cola Water Cons
Federal Aviation Admin (Structures _RR
over 200 ft or w/in 20000 ft of Pub _Ditch Company
Airport _Art Elmquist (MUD Area)
_Federal Communications Comm
Referral List _ cl
Name: vS�'2- Case# ,�L /
i
County Towns&Cities Fire Districts
A ey Ault _Ault F-1
th Department _Berthoud _Berthoud F-2
_Extension Office on _Briggsdal 24
ergency Management Office-Ed Herring _Dacono 0h
84 ton F-3
eriffs Office _Eaton _Eaton F-4
ublic Works _Erie _Fort Lupton F-5
_Housing Authority _Evans _Galeton F-6
.��art Authority • _Firestone- Hudson F-7
• ilding Inspection // upton _Johnstown F-
Il'.de Compliance,J !Y ` _Frederick LaSalle F-9
Assessor Office/Chris Woodruff(Final Ran) _Garden City _Mountain View F-10
_Kim Ogle(Landscape Plans) _Gilcrest _Milliken F-11
' or Peggy(Addressing Change of Zone) _Greeley _Nunn F-12
mbulance Services _Grover _Pawnee F-22
g _Hudson _Platteville F-13
iv.of Water Resources _Johnstown _Platte Valley F-14
_Geological Survey _Keenesburg _Poudre Valley F-15
ep ent of Health _Kersey _Raymer F-2
partment of Transportation Ile _Southeast Weld F-16
_Historical Society chbuie _Union Colony F-26
Water Conservation Board - _Longmont _Western Hills F-20
_Oil&Gas Conservation Commission _Mead Wiggins F-1B
Division of Wildlife _Milliken _Windsor/Severance F-17
Outh Hwy 66(Loveland) New Raymer
_North Hwy 66(Greeley) _Northglenn Legal '
_Division of Minerals/Geology _Nunn Parcel ID#
Soil Conservation Districts _Pierce Zone Acres?
_Big Thompson _Platteville USDA
Boulder Valley _Severance Airport
_Brighton _Thornton Geo Haz
_Centennial _Windsor FP? Panel#
_Fort Collins Co 'es Road Impact Fee Area?
_Greeley ams (SW#1_,#2 ,#3_,Windsor_)
_Longmont _Boulder IGA? ORD#
_Morgan _Broomfield MUD?
_Platte Valley _Larimer
the t Weld Other
est Adams _Central Cob.Water Conservancy Dist
Federal Government Agencies . L Hand ter
_US Army Corps of Engrs ool DisMct RE-_2 7 , Ret—i A'''''
USDA-APHIS_ Vet Service _Art Elmquist(MUD Area)
_Federal Aviation Admin(Structures over _Ditch Company,
over 200 ft or w/in 20000 ft of Pub Airport Commissioner
_Federal Communications Comm —1 F
11-02-2006 13:41 FROM-ADAMS COUNTY PlaNING +3038537015 1-845 P.001/001 F-298
riertitS
pcWeld County Referral
.
00T 2 7 Z5Ou October 26,2006
COLORADO . •
The Weld County Department of Planning Services has received the following item for review;
•
Applicant Neal and Judith Foster Case Number SPR-407
Please Reply By November 24,2006 Planner Michelle Martin
Project Site Plan Review for office building for heavy equipment sales, service warehouse
and maintenance building for heavy equipment,
Legal Lot A of Amended Corrected RE-470; being part of the SE4 of Section 30, Ti N,
R66W of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado,
Location North of and adjacent to CR 4 and west of CR 27. For a more precise location,
see legal.
Parcel Number 1471 30 400103
— -
The application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you
consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Please reply by the above listed date so that we may
give full consideration to your recommendation. Any response not received before or on this date may be
deemed to be a positive response to the Department of Planning Services. If you have any further questions
regarding the application, please call the Planner associated with the request. Please note that new
information may be added to applications under review during the review process. If you desire to
examine or obtain this additional information, please call the Department of Planning Services.
❑ We have reviewed the request and find that it does/does not comply with our Comprehensive Plan
3( We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests.
❑ See attached letter.
Comments:
Signature /1
Agency Cotey., f ��, 47 Date
+Weld County Planning Dept. +4209 CR 24.5, Longmont,CO.80504. +(720)652-4210 04,8730 +(720)652-4211 fax
it/
D
(1: Weld County Planning Department
SOUTHWEST BUILDING
NOV 9 2006
iiREcW9WfOUhh1tYReferral.
C. October 26, 2006
COLORADO
The Weld County Department of Planning Services has received the following item for review:
Applicant Neal and Judith Foster Case Number SPR-407
Please Reply By November 24, 2006 Planner Michelle Martin
Project Site Plan Review for office building for heavy equipment sales, service warehouse
and maintenance building for heavy equipment.
Legal Lot A of Amended Corrected RE-470; being part of the SE4 of Section 30, T1 N,
R66W of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado.
Location North of and adjacent to CR 4 and west of CR 27. For a more precise location,
see legal.
Parcel Number 1471 30 400103
The application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you
consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Please reply by the above listed date so that we may
give full consideration to your recommendation. Any response not received before or on this date may be
deemed to be a positive response to the Department of Planning Services. If you have any further questions
regarding the application, please call the Planner associated with the request. Please note that new
information may be added to applications under review during the review process. If you desire to
examine or obtain this additional information, please call the Department of Planning Services.
U , We have reviewed the request and find that it does/does not comply with our Comprehensive Plan
U4 We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests.
Li See attached letter.
Comments:
Signature 77)7
��ilr V /16r/200C
Agency (1,-7 77Ci pe/. 4/An/ Date
+Weld County Planning Dept. ❖4209 CR 24.5, Longmont,CO.80504 4(720)652-4210 ext.8730 4(720)652-4211 fax
WIWeld County PlanniWekLtCounty Referral
CGREELEY OFFICE I DC NOV 1 5 2006 October 26, 2006
COLORADO RECEIVED
The Weld County Department of Planning Services has received the following item for review:
Applicant Neal and Judith Foster Case Number SPR-407
Please Reply By November 24, 2006 Planner Michelle Martin
Project Site Plan Review for office building for heavy equipment sales, service warehouse
and maintenance building for heavy equipment.
Legal Lot A of Amended Corrected RE-470; being part of the SE4 of Section 30, Ti N,
R66W of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado.
Location North of and adjacent to CR 4 and west of CR 27. For a more precise location,
see legal.
Parcel Number 1471 30 400103
The application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you
consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Please reply by the above listed date so that we may
give full consideration to your recommendation. Any response not received before or on this date may be
deemed to be a positive response to the Department of Planning Services. If you have any further questions
regarding the application, please call the Planner associated with the request. Please note that new
information may be added to applications under review during the review process. If you desire to
examine or obtain this additional information, please call the Department of Planning Services.
❑ We have reviewed the request and find that it does/does not comply with our Comprehensive Plan
We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests.
U See attached letter.
Comments: - `" Ifs_Ar S
Signature t I l l 0 k,
Agency �� iC, j)c Date V
•:•Weld County Planning Dept. +4209 CR 24.5,Longmont,CO.80504 +(720)652-4210 ext.8730 x••(720)652-4211 fax
Page 1of1
Michelle Martin
From: Jesse Hein
Sent: Wednesday,April 18, 2007 2:11 PM
To: Michelle Martin
Subject: SPR-407
Michelle,
Public Works has received a revised set of the construction plans and drainage report for SPR-407 which are
signed, stamped and dated by a professional engineer. This concludes the known requirements from the Public
Works department.
Have a great day,
Jesse
Jesse Hein
Weld County-Public Works Department
1111 -H Street
Greeley,CO 80632
970.356.4000 x3750
jhein@co.weld.co.us
04/18/2007
Page 1 of 1
Michelle Martin
From: Jesse Hein
Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2007 2:54 PM
To: Michelle Martin
Subject: RE:
Hey Michelle,
I've reviewed both cases; each meets the requirements of Public Works. A sign-off memo for each case will be
following.
Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.
Thanks
Jesse
From: Michelle Martin
Sent: Friday, March 30, 2007 1:43 PM
To: Jesse Hein
Subject:
Hi Jess,
SPR-401 and SPR-407 are just about ready to be recorded do you have any
outstanding issues besides the improvements agreements?
./dlca� Asa
Planner II
4209 CR 24.5
Longmont, CO 80504
mmartin@co.weld.co.us
PHONE: (720)652-4210 x 8730
FAX: (720) 652-4211
04/09/2007
Page 1 of 2
Michelle Martin
From: Michelle Martin
Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2007 3:46 PM
To: 'Randy King'
Cc: Jesse Hein
Subject: FW: Clarification
Hi Randy,
The Department of Public Works and the Planning Department has had the chance to review the
improvements agreement for SPR-407. The Department of Planning Services will need to review the
bid for the fencing/screening. Please refer to the following email regarding the Department of Public
Works and their comments.
S ./(4 n
Planner II
4209 CR 24.5
Longmont, CO 80504
mmartin@co.weld.co.us
PHONE: (720)652-4210 x 8730
FAX: (720) 652-4211
From: Jesse Hein
Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2007 9:03 AM
To: Michelle Martin
Subject: RE: Clarification
Hey Michelle,
I reviewed the resubmitted portions of the On-site Improvements Agreement for SPR-407. The changes are
acceptable and meet the requirements outlined in Public Works comments dated February 22, 2007.
Public Works will require a copy of the entire revised Improvements agreement for our records.
Please let me know if you have any other questions or concerns.
Jesse
From: Michelle Martin
Sent: Monday, March 05, 2007 10:28 AM
To: Jesse Hein
Subject: FW: Clarification
Please review and let me know what you think. This is for case SPR-407.
Planner II
4209 CR 24.5
Longmont, CO 80504
03/06/2007
Page 2 of 2
mmartin@co.weld.co.us
PHONE: (720) 652-4210 x 8730
FAX: (720) 652-4211
From: Randy King [mailto:randy@kingcontracting.com]
Sent: Monday, March 05, 2007 9:38 AM
To: Michelle Martin
Subject: RE: Clarification
Here is another copy.
Randy
From: Michelle Martin [mailto:mmartin@co.weld.co.us]
Sent: Monday, March 05, 2007 8:27 AM
To: Randy King
Subject: RE: Clarification
Hi Randy,
I did not receive an attachment with your email but yes I will need to review the revised exhibits.
Sa Yin/diet,
Planner II
4209 CR 24.5
Longmont, CO 80504
mmartin@co.weld.co.us
PHONE: (720)652-4210 x 8730
FAX: (720) 652-4211
From: Randy King [mailto:randy@kingcontracting.com]
Sent: Friday, March 02, 2007 9:40 AM
To: Michelle Martin
Subject: Clarification
Dave informed me of the requirements to resubmit exhibit AA and AB or sheets 9, 10, 11 and 12 of the
improvements agreement. Attached is the revised agreement in it's entirety. Is this acceptable to you? Do I only
bring you those pages as the complete form was not returned to us?
Please respond as soon as possible.
Randy King
03/06/2007
In_
CountGRy
Planning
Department1 FEB 2 3 2007
,44 MEMORANDUM RECEIVED
' TO: Michelle Martin,W� Planning Department
DATE: 22-February-2007�. FROM: Jesse Hein, Public 'rf'4cs lCepartment
COLORADO SUBJECT: SPR-407,Neal and Judith Foster(Site Plan Review)3
Weld County Public Works Department has reviewed this Site Plan Review request. Comments made during this
phase of the process may not be all-inclusive, as other concerns or issues may arise during the remaining
application process.
Comments
This memorandum is a follow up to comments dated February 12, 2007.
General Comments :
The applicant has submitted a revised drainage report for Foster Equipment Company dated February 14, 2007 and
revised construction plans which are acceptable to Public Works.
The applicant shall provide a full set of construction plans signed, stamped and dated by a professional engineer for the
Public Works Department's files.
Copies of all revised materials must be sent to the Department of Planning Services.
Improvements Agreements:
An Improvements Agreement for Foster Equipment Company has been submitted and is acceptable with the following
revisions:
1. All cost items shall be shown on either the Exhibit A form or the attached Exhibit A.
2. The following item shall be added:
Concrete Driveway and Parking for approximately 11,200 square feet.
3. Engineering and Supervision Costs shall be 5% of the subtotal of all items.
4. Exhibit B shall be revised to show the approximate date of completion(month and year).
Recommendation
❑ The Public Works Department will continue the review process for this site plan once we receive the requested submittal
materials.
The applicant shall address the comments listed above for this review process. The review process will
continue only when all appropriate elements have been submitted. Issues of concern must be resolved with the
Public Works Department prior to recording.*
• PC: SPR-407,Neal and Judith Foster(Site Plan Review)3
Email&Original:Michelle Martin
PC by Post applicant: Randal King
PC by Post engineer: Laube Engineering, LLC
Page 1 of 1 x�a,
Weld County Planning Department
GREELEY OFFICE
0 FEB 1 4 2007
MEMORANDUM RECEIVED
TO: Michelle Martin,Planning Department DATE: 12-February-2007
WI ii P C. FROM: Jesse Hein, Public eparhnent
COLORADO SUBJECT: SPR-407,Neal and Judith Foster(Site Plan Review)2
Weld County Public Works Department has reviewed this Site Plan Review request. Comments made during this
phase of the process may not be all-inclusive, as other concerns or issues may arise during the remaining
application process.
Comments
This memorandum is a follow up to comments dated November 21, 2006.
External Roads: WCR 4 south and adjacent to the property is a local paved road and requires an 80-foot right-of-way at
full build out. There is presently a 60-foot right-of-way. The applicant shall verify the existing right-of-way and the
documents creating the right-of-way shall be delineated on the site plan map. If the right-of-way cannot be verified, it
will be dedicated on the final plat.
Access and Parking: The applicant has provided access and parking to the site which is acceptable to Public Works
Storm Water Drainage: The applicant has requested a variance from the County stormwater detention requirements
(Chapter 24-7-130) in a letter dated August 25, 2006. The request was made due to site constraints, flat topography and
native sandy soils. The applicant has proposed a stormwater retention facility and provided adequate calculation and
infiltration rates to show any stormwater won't be held on site for a period of longer than 72 hours. Weld County Public
Works is in concurrence with this retention facility that infiltrates to the groundwater.
The revised drainage report has been reviewed by Weld County Public Works and will be acceptable after correction of
minor math errors (please see red-line comments in the attached Stormwater Management Plan). A wet stamped, signed
and dated drainage report will be required.
Please show contours for a minimum of 200 ft offsite on the Grading, Drainage, and Erosion Control sheet to verify the
presence or absence of offsite flow contributions to the site.
Please note,the pond surface and subsurface soils shall not be covered with gravels or other materials non-native to the
site. This includes the recycled asphalt gravels proposed for the remainder of the site. The native materials discovered
during the percolation tests must remain intact and uncovered by outside soils, sands, gravels, or other materials.
The following notes shall be added to the general notes on the final plat:
• "Vehicle parking and equipment/material storage shall be prohibited in the proposed retention pond."
• "Unlined drainage facilities and all areas disturbed during construction shall be actively revegetated. Seed mixes
should be selected to match the conditions where they will be used. "
., ,,.... Page 1 of 2 �,..
Recommendation
❑ The Public Works Department will continue the review process for this site plan once we receive the requested submittal
materials.
The applicant shall address the comments listed above for this review process. The review process will
continue only when all appropriate elements have been submitted. Issues of concern must be resolved with the
Public Works Department prior to recording.*
*PC: SPR-407,Neal and Judith Foster(Site Plan Review)
Email&Original: Michelle Martin
PC by Post applicant: Randal King
PC by Post engineer: Laube Engineering, LLC
Page 2 of 2
r Weld"1nty Planning Department
p r,BEELEY OFFICE
(lit
� NOV 27 2006
Re�terral
4119
1 October 26, 2006
"lig.uUC OCT 3 0 2006 D
COLORADO
WELD COUNTY PUBLI 0• IF.p
The Weld County Department of Planning ' • •I. ,in. tern for review:
Applicant Neal and Judith Foster Case Number SPR-407
Please Reply By November 24, 2006 Planner Michelle Martin
Project Site Plan Review for office building for heavy equipment sales, service warehouse
and maintenance building for heavy equipment.
Legal Lot A of Amended Corrected RE-470; being part of the SE4 of Section 30, Ti N,
R66W of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado.
Location North of and adjacent to CR 4 and west of CR 27. For a more precise location,
see legal.
Parcel Number 1471 30 400103 .
The application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you
consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Please reply by the above listed date so that we may
give full consideration to your recommendation. Any response not received before or on this date may be
deemed to be a positive response to the Department of Planning Services. If you have any further questions
regarding the application, please call the Planner associated with the request. Please note that new
information may be added to applications under review during the review process. If you desire to
examine or obtain this additional information, please call the Department of Planning Services.
U We have reviewed the request and find that it does/does not comply with our Comprehensive Plan
❑ We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests.
al See attached letter.
Comments:
Signature 7/4/6Agency 4,e ,r/ Lac cs Date
❖Weld County Planning Dept. ❖4209 CR 24.5, Longmont,CO.80504 ❖(720)652-4210 ext.8730 +(720)652-4211 fax
•
MEMORANDUM
TO: Michelle Martin,Planning Department DATE: 21-November-2006
III
Pۥ FROM: Jesse Hein, Public partment
COLORADO SUBJECT: SPR-407, Neal and Judith Foster(Site Plan Review)
Weld County Public Works Department has reviewed this Site Plan Review request. Comments made during this
phase of the process may not be all-inclusive, as other concerns or issues may arise during the remaining
application process.
Comments
External Roads: The external roadways are capable of handling anticipated traffic from the proposed facility.
WCR 4 south and adjacent to the property is a local paved road and requires an 80-foot right-of-way at full build out.
There is presently a 60-foot right-of-way. The applicant shall verify the existing right-of-way and the documents creating
the right-of-way shall be noted on the site plan map. If the right-of-way cannot be verified, it will be dedicated on the
final plat.
Access: The applicant is proposing three access points to the site. Two access points are proposed for visitor entry, and
the third as access for equipment. Due to the status of WCR 4 and the layout of the site the applicant shall reduce the
number of access point to two.
• The applicant shall utilize the existing gate as one access for the site.
• The applicant shall have one access for visitor/employee parking to the proposed office building.
Public Works recommends centering the access in front of the handicap parking for safety and easier
accessibility/circulation to all parking spaces.
Access flairs for the equipment access shall a have a 40 foot radius per county code 23-2-150 R 6.
Parking: ADA requirements shall be met for this site. Parking Lots shall conform to all standards of the Americans with
Disabilities Act. Public Works recommends striping of the parking and to identify the ADA space(s) with the appropriate
symbols and signs.
Storm Water Drainage: The applicant has proposed a retention facility to manage onsite stormwater discharges. Due to
site constraints, Weld County Public Works recommends approval of the retention facility that infiltrates to the
groundwater under the following conditions:
• Vehicle parking and equipment/material storage shall be prohibited in the proposed retention pond.
• The pond surface and subsurface soils shall not be covered with gravels or other materials non-native
to the site. This includes the recycled asphalt gravels proposed for the remainder of the site. The
native materials discovered during the percolation tests must remain intact and uncovered by outside
soils, sands, gravels, or other materials.
• The proposed retention pond shall be placed in a dedicated drainage easement and surrounded by a
berm or fence. This will prevent vehicle and equipment traffic from damaging the integrity of surface
soils and altering infiltration rates from the pond.
�v� ----. Page 1 oft
• Unlined drainage facilities and all areas disturbed during construction shall be actively revegetated.
Seed mixes should be selected to match the conditions where they will be used. Recommended seed
mixes may be obtained from the Weld County Public Works Pest and Weed Supervisor.
If the proposed retention pond must be resized to accommodate surface uses on the site,the applicant must update
calculations and submit a revised drainage report to Public Works for review and approval.
Please show contours for a minimum of 200 ft offsite on the Grading, Drainage, and Erosion Control sheet to verify the
presence or absence of offsite flow contributions to the site.
Recommendation
❑ The Public Works Department will continue the review process for this site plan once we receive the requested submittal
materials.
The applicant shall address thecomments listed above for this review process. The review process will continue only when all
apptoptiatt.elements have been submitted. Issues of concern must be resolved with the Public Works Department prior to recording.*
* PC: SPR-407,Neal and Judith Foster(Site Plan Review)
Email&Original:Michelle Martin
PC by Post applicant: Randal King
PC by Post engineer: Laube Engineering, LLC
Page 2 of 2 mm
•
STATE OF COLORADO
OFFICE OF THE STATE ENGINEER <61-6626
Division of Water Resources
Department of Natural Resources cS
1313 Sherman Street,Room 818 Weld County Panning Department
Denver,Colorado 80203 SOUTHWEST BUILDING �' _
Phone(303)866-3581
FAX(303)866-3589 NOV 2 2006 Bill Owens
www.watecstate.co.us Governor
October 30, 2006 v
E L �V E D Russell George
Executive Director
Michelle Martin Hal D.Simpson,P.E.
Weld County Planning Dept. State Engineer
4209 CR 24.5
Longmont, CO 80504
Re: SPR-407 - Site Plan Review for office building for heavy equipment sales, service
warehouse and maintenance building for heavy equipment
Dear Ms. Martin:
This referral does not appear to qualify as a "subdivision"as defined in Section 30-28-
101(10)(a), C.R.S. Therefore, pursuant to the State Engineer's March 4, 2005 memorandum to
county planning directors, this office will only perform a cursory review of the referral information and
provide comments. The comments do not address the adequacy of the water supply plan for this
project or the ability of the water supply plan to satisfy any County regulations or requirements. In
addition,the comments provided herein cannot be used to guarantee a viable water supply
plan or infrastructure,the issuance of a well permit, or physical availability of water.
According to the submitted information, the commercial site will be served by well no. 116824.
Well 116824 is currently permitted for drinking and sanitary purposes only in an individual commercial
business. The permit allows an average daily withdrawal of 300 gallons at a pumping rate of 15
gallons per minute. According to Item M of the referral information the plantings (landscaping) shown
on the plan will be maintained by the same private well on the property as used for potable water.
Outside uses, including landscape watering, are not allowed under the terms and conditions of the
current well permit. Therefore,well no. 116824 cannot be used for landscape watering until such time
as the well owner obtains a court approved augmentation plan for the well and the well is repermitted.
The well can be used strictly for drinking and sanitary purposes at the site as long as the annual
withdrawal and pumping rate specified on the permit are not exceeded.
Should you have any questions in this matter, please contact Joanna Williams of this office.
Sincerely,
( N'OttAiRot
Kevin G. Rein, P.E.
Chief of Water Supply
KGR/JMW
Weld County Planning ent 1kig/SS b( -)
a SOUTHWEST BUILDING l
NOV 1 3 2006
RECEIVED
Weld County Referral
Cam 27 2006 October 26, zoos
COLORADO Qvauswerreade
The Weld County Department of Planning Services has received the following item for review:
Applicant Neal and Judith Foster Case Number SPR-407
Please Reply By November 24, 2006 Planner Michelle Martin
Project Site Plan Review for office building for heavy equipment sales, service warehouse
and maintenance building for heavy equipment.
Legal Lot A of Amended Corrected RE-470; being part of the SE4 of Section 30, Ti N,
R66W of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado.
Location North of and adjacent to CR 4 and west of CR 27. For a more precise location,
see legal.
l'
u \;r 1471 30 400103
N i
The application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you
consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Please reply by the above listed date so that we may
give full consideration to your recommendation. Any response not received before or on this date may be
deemed to be a positive response to the Department of Planning Services. If you have any further questions
regarding the application, please call the Planner associated with the request. Please note that new
information may be added to applications under review during the review process. If you desire to
examine or-obtain this additional information, please call the Department of Planning Services.
U We have reviewed the request and find that it does/does not comply with our Comprehensive Plan
U We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests.
U See attached letter.
Comments: --t I 'C cisG Jp CcOss Germ' Bain -4-1ou15 WCR 4 is
Lippo&d +o be.corne) ct_ 3/4 access ivy Avg jnfcri'vn candt+Wvi
u lk 41.MatLi iv c c(o.sd -b US `6S 'in +he 1tY19
418.11'Yl. I l - app l t'c A.44 she u C d be, rnci_o&.Q c1/4. oUrC 01 v_
Signature Gcsi - jt /7 /p co
Agency C O CC P., t cc SS Date
❖Weld County Planning Dept. +4209 CR 24.5, Longmont,CO.80504 ❖(720)652-4210 ext.8730 ❖(720)652-4211 fax
Oct 31 06 03: 39p Admin 303-65,.x--4101 p. 2
Greater Brighton Fire Protection District
425 South Main Street•Brighton,Colorado 80601
Telephone: (303)659-4101•Fax: (303)659-4103•Website: www.gbfpd.org.
October ;1,2006
Ms.Michelle Martin
Weld County Planning Department
918 10th Street
Greeley,CO 80631
SUBJECT: WELD COUNTY REFERRAL
CASE NUMBER: SPR-407
APPLICANT: NEAL AND JUDITH FOSTER
LOCATION: North of and adjacent to CR 4;West of CR 27.
Dear Ms.Martin:
The Fire Prevention Bureau has reviewed the Weld County Referral application dates October
26,2006 and has the following comments for your consideration:
1. The Fire District shall review and approve all construction drawings, automatic sprinkler
system and fire alarm system for the proposed office building for heavy equipment ales and
service warehouse and maintenance building for heavy equipment.
2. New buildings shall be identified with an address number at the main entrance on It 4 and
on the primary structure. The address numerals shall have a height of 5 in and stn ke width
of % in (minimum) mounted on a contrasting background. Fire District rea immends
reflective material for the address number at the main entrance.
3. Applicant shall notify the Fire District if spray-painting operations (Le. an ar a where
dangerous quantities of flammable vapors or combustible residues, dusts, or de) osits are
present)will take place at the proposed service warehouse and maintenance building
Should you have any questions on this review please do not hesitate to contact me.
Respectfully,
Dan Biro
Fire Prevention Bureau
C...at.s r, r4. C.R...rtr.. As cairn, war;. O. Dirtr;.t
` 131
WI I D Weld County Referral
C, October 26, 2006
COLORADO
The Weld County Department of Planning Services has received the following item for review:
Applicant Neal and Judith Foster Case Number SPR-407
Please Reply By November 24, 2006 Planner Michelle Martin
Project Site Plan Review for office building for heavy equipment sales, service warehouse
and maintenance building for heavy equipment.
Legal Lot A of Amended Corrected RE-470; being part of the SE4 of Section 30, Ti N,
R66W of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado.
Location North of and adjacent to CR 4 and west of CR 27. For a more precise location,
see legal.
Parcel Number 1471 30 400103
The application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you
consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Please reply by the above listed date so that we may
give full consideration to your recommendation. Any response not received before or on this date may be
deemed to be a positive response to the Department of Planning Services. If you have any further questions
regarding the application, please call the Planner associated with the request. Please note that new
information may be added to applications under review during the review process. If you desire to
examine or obtain this additional information, please call the Department of Planning Services.
U We have reviewed the request and find that it does/does not comply with our Comprehensive Plan
U We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests.
See attached letter.
Comments:
Signature // — (-Po 004o
Agency Date
*Weld County Planning Dept. ❖4209 CR 24.5, Longmont, CO.80504 +(720)652-4210 ext.8730 +(720)652-4211 fax
rit LH. DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING and BUILDING SERVICES
Weld County Administrative Offices
4209 CR 24.5, Longmont, CO 80504
WEBSITE: www.co.weld.co.us
Phone (720) 652-4210, Ext. 8736
'ilC.
COLORADO Ntwnber 20, 2006
Applicant: Neal and Judith Foster
Case Number: SPR-407
Project: Site Plan Review for office building for heavy equipment sales, service warehouse
and maintenance building br heavy equipment.
Legal: Lot A of Amended Corrected RE-470; being part of S4 Section 30, T1N, R66W, of the
6th PM Weld County, Colorado.
Location: North of and adjacent to CR 4 and vest of CR 27
Parcel Number 1471 30 400103
There are no parcels on record for this parcel.
Prior to any alterations, change of occupancy, or new construction being initiated at this site see
below.
1 A building permit application must be completed, and tvo complete sets of engineered plans
must be submitted for review. A geotechnical engineering report preformed by a registered State
of Colorado engineer shall be required.
2 A plan review must be approved and permit must be issued prior to the start of construction.
3 The new office shall conform to the requirements of the 2003 International Building Code, the
2005 National Electrical Code and Chapter 29 of the Weld County Code.
4 Setback and offset distances shall be determined by the 2003 International Building Code and
Chapter 23 of the Weld County Code (Offset and setback distances are measured from the
farthest projection from the structure).
5 A Flood Hazard Development Plan is required for buildings located within a 100 year flood
plane.
6 A letter from the fire district to ascertain if a permit is required.
Siinccerely,,e g
Robert Powell
Building Plans Examiner
Service,Teamwork,Integrity,Quality
Weld County Planning Depart nt
SDU"`�+EST BUILDINGccm
0 7C I 3 1 2006
re?,
RE LWED
Weld County Plannin�e1d County Referral
C ,s l , 2., October 26, 2006
COLORADO RELti V ED
The Weld County Department of Planning Services has received the following item for review:
Applicant Neal and Judith Foster Case Number SPR-407
Please Reply By November 24, 2006 Planner Michelle Martin
Project Site Plan Review for office building for heavy equipment sales, service warehouse
and maintenance building for heavy equipment.
Legal Lot A of Amended Corrected RE-470; being part of the SE4 of Section 30, Ti N,
R66W of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado.
Location North of and adjacent to CR 4 and west of CR 27. For a more precise location,
see legal.
Parcel Number 1471 30 400103
The application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you
consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Please reply by the above listed date so that we may
give full consideration to your recommendation. Any response not received before or on this date may be
deemed to be a positive response to the Department of Planning Services. If you have any further questions
regarding the application, please call the Planner associated with the request. Please note that new
information may be added to applications under review during the review process. If you desire to
examine or obtain this additional information, please call the Department of Planning Services.
�Uy, We have reviewed the request and find that it does/does not comply with our Comprehensive Plan
0 We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests.
U See attached letter.
Comments:
1 neAZ Cionicti Mb( Cleo el 0 Ann p,Terri feat hee.n
Ux -tc_ •kr) Lm(f, . anti Cc(�Q urdir -\hc ahtru, ()Aral *
Signature r �'\1�,v-v t- ID a (�1�
Agency Lb-TM Ce( N tat g Date
+Weld County Planning Dept. .4209 CR 24.5, Longmont,CO.80504 +(720)652-4210 ext.8730 +(720)652-4211 fax
Page 1 of 1
Michelle Martin
From: Charlotte Davis
Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2007 4:04 PM
To: Michelle Martin
Subject: SPR-407
Michelle,
I am in receipt of a waste handling plan for SPR-407. The plan has been reviewed and is approved. The
condition has been satisfied.
All Health related conditions prior to recording the plat have been met.
Best Regards, Char
Charlotte Davis, MPH
Weld County Department of Public Health & Environment
1555 N. 17th Avenue
Greeley, CO 80631
(970) 304-6415 x2208
FAX (970) 304-6411
01/18/2007
Weld County Planning Department
GREELEY OFFICE
MEMORANDUM DEC 0 7 2006
Kita RECEIVED
TO: MICHELLE MARTIN, PLANNING SERVICES
FROM: CHARLOTTE DAVIS, ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH v )
CSUBJECT:SPR-407 NEAL & JUDITH FOSTER
. DATE: 12/05/2006
COLORADO Cc:
Environmental Health Services has reviewed this proposal for heavy equipment sales,
service warehouse and maintenance building for heavy equipment. We have no
objections to the proposal, however, we do recommend that the following conditions be
part of any approval:
We recommend that the following requirements be met prior to allowing the plat to be
recorded:
1. The applicant shall submit a waste handling plan, for approval, to the
Environmental Health Services Division of the Weld County Department of Public
Health & Environment. The plan shall include at a minimum, the following:
1) A list of wastes which are expected to be generated on site (this should
include expected volumes and types of waste generated).
2) A list of the type and volume of chemicals expected to be stored on site.
3) The waste handler and facility where the waste will be disposed (including
the facility name, address, and phone number).
We recommend that the following requirements be incorporated into the permit as
conditions that must be met prior to operation:
1. A stormwater discharge permit may be required for a
development/redevelopment/construction site where a contiguous or non-
contiguous land disturbance is greater than or equal to one acre in area. The
applicant shall inquire with the Water Quality Control Division (WQCD) of the
Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment at
www.cdphe.state.co.us/wq/PermitsUnit if they are required to obtain a
stormwater discharge permit. Alternately, the applicant can provide evidence
from WQCD that they are not subject to these requirements.
We recommend that the following requirements be incorporated into the permit as
conditions that must be met prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy:
1. An individual sewage disposal system is required for the proposed office and
shop buildings and shall be installed according to the Weld County Individual
Sewage Disposal Regulations.
2. The septic system is required to be designed by a Colorado Registered
Professional Engineer according to the Weld County Individual Sewage Disposal
Regulations.
We recommend that the following requirements be incorporated into the permit as
development standards:
1. All liquid and solid wastes (as defined in the Solid Wastes Disposal Sites and
Facilities Act, 30-20-100.5, C.R.S., as amended) shall be stored and removed for
final disposal in a manner that protects against surface and groundwater
contamination.
2. No permanent disposal of wastes shall be permitted at this site. This is not
meant to include those wastes specifically excluded from the definition of a solid
waste in the Solid Wastes Disposal Sites and Facilities Act, 30-20-100.5, C.R.S.,
as amended.
3. Waste materials shall be handled, stored, and disposed in a manner that controls
fugitive dust, fugitive particulate emissions, blowing debris, and other potential
nuisance conditions.
4. The applicant shall operate in accordance with the approved "waste handling
plan".
5. Fugitive dust and fugitive particulate emissions shall be controlled on this site.
6. This facility shall adhere to the maximum permissible noise levels allowed in the
Commercial Zone as delineated in 25-12-103 C.R.S., as amended.
7. Adequate handwashing and toilet facilities shall be provided for employees and
patrons of the facility.
8. Sewage disposal for the facility shall be by septic system. Any septic system
located on the property must comply with all provisions of the Weld County Code,
pertaining to Individual Sewage Disposal Systems.
9. A permanent, adequate water supply shall be provided for drinking and sanitary
purposes. (Commercial Well — Permit # 116824)
2
10.All potentially hazardous chemicals must be stored and handled in a safe manner
in accordance with product labeling and in a manner that minimizes the release
of hazardous air pollutants (HAP's) and volatile organic compounds (VOC's).
11.If applicable, the applicant shall obtain a stormwater discharge permit from the
Colorado Department of Public Health & Environment, Water Quality Control
Division.
12.The operation shall comply with all applicable rules and regulations of the State
and Federal agencies and the Weld County Code.
3
• 1
q ,nr---,.. -40.--vz ;! 1 ; 1
^
i b.. i E
9t s� ri`:i.iieg, F f r iiS• I A1
-. t� = X 2i i u 5k'
st ii ii tY i i z. �` Pt i, F S ,;tit t •1 +� ;. �.+a •. i .•, ; x
A„„ x £ iirsaRi i ',; ' ,;;gpE i F F; jF r; g
C:)
Icsi dlti�lY 8 ° i "tR 1 - ... ..1..i'r' _ t ..
1` §°j : jiaiFiiz is •
74i a !"t* e I V r,
.04 a ii.:
€ 8 a •� .�
�s 9 �giil"�gYiFio�! !pK {6 C In
1,1 I. ! ' _
w 36i ,ii° E s H- 3 sa B . ! • W
•E l sg iys=,E.bj iii ga gli' i, l { �1 cai
I ? I Iglblk:st"lx'i-bs! i! I e r i • F $ f .g i g ? �. .-^
tl a :OH-1,90— ilE i-� i Sb 5 rc!
t - 8 .zas :aeF�'!!1 it C itr a 1 i S I i' I o,,
@s o $. d b 4 t E
•i= !i ;14i • 8 d
a '.R.5 rt• "s$iig'e$'•_ij 3; E-.4-#E l p• if § (CI pR al as Li= �t
'� =866. ! :� ae a-6is c t,,:
E— g :e
`aar°r of
i t ,3 F 'f',1 , a' '!3 i i Of: ill r�
M :I 3ji" €i :{ X13 ! ( , J 3 i i=4!.1, iii ;I if,F;€ il,, -, ,
iJ1j!
� l � 'b 3 i�lhi
i iii `i I: ii► i ti mii' 1 li! .iii=t {{ = i EF-3 + l ifi[i E 1ti t k :t r6! ei h:'
11 If fill F3riliel ii Ijj1ifli#i, ij! ;3 3ll ; I+' !•pil1Fii : ii- Ni21 a p y Ii" a
3 ii lip'; i iii i S E i� 4 tl!t z } F l Will!, i {# _:-_`+--1 , yk ii 'pi ' 1;3 # 3l iii# Iy#t3l a# .iiif 1. dill ill Ilfifiilt1.1 iiII! . ;r:i#-1 tI
k . ii#] t ' i ofII F i ;'LillI Q S!ti' j _ \
LI 7 ei ee [[[ Ef
} i ii•#! j 1t31tl it I!!-; I'3ti€H I O 'i 11li1 I"
e; • l ij• 'fill!
i d ,i� r' 1 f t +' f tli3 tb }ia . t �;,#l�!, l�#►
Z .OS J({ IiDIf i{I {g:ts3giitEtilllietiS' SjSj))`` iii i EF' ;' 3i i{
H ,zw ea►t ►— ial •. ia{w E_ ! . it=f# lCtt!!,1i #• i I' E �fl �!iiE i
— O : • s PA
a. d o .oa r r ••oo,saoos ,M =r 8 g$ t P
•
U ss� B,. :s-j (!..
z: k .
W 1 ¢
oE- I rIII
W0A �aJn
p � n� I �i
41 I
U3 Li.
Co) pi• 9g* s '•
W � z i $ a
re •
C4 43' u0 IR - I:
Rs^ 8; ra g$il#ima; ''' 1 ,,
FLOI= _ elg • c !
?
.,i I
Z • s
,
Q I ► 2t
W o I § !yt }
e k
A z a: x _. Ii... ;� . ill Ill,
z o ,€ - `. >
WW11 � 1 t p i Ey- i i�t D
s S - co i
hit * : fll
<C i • y 4E $ i i <1
i t t i : s i. i I bt FiL J4
a iif # i i 1 Ilx EV I• • Ili. J_pT
i[
it id - ,. • 1 S !''l :..',. -i.
.Tti W
a s J��
i t - •
{,n oNU i Uul iu
I , w tp}fa ryuiak n n.til •
•
k . . • •, .• f :
j t; twVmmmM�Hip,,Ptinhm T4jk. Y,
A ' {
•
w
.
d` iF
k A I 1 4,:.,
k M• L;t I-I. , i
1 q p # 13ft _ v
rrk { ti ._ l 1 i
E f. p'� t t + � �-
OH
L;
:. . t '-_, i r t + Ih' •
a i, u I I(t ₹ � r 4; *, I : .a
' ' G '� 7, t i t10 ($ i• 'M x r 1 ''4 k F�I' '� ,:
III y { 1' .
t t - i
It w: n
.� # • .h tl Sep . ,� f l'ar „k ,Ili •
P •, •,'iil .:.: �� : u ft�eN'y A,. 7w>.a.�«.. t` .....
4 Ir ,.t,� +; .r •
y 'd
y • 3' i d "tt• 'gg ii:' Y. �' k '. I
,C • q'��� f '� • t yy�� r
1 I a • rest ' A' •
j
t. '1pG1A 111. Ii°t �.... "}y� f 't,r j pk, i t k.. .,_
4. •atttt•tt
,- 1 -. F(r}/e«t j- �d���� gg t t5i ` �.-
/ w It F uidi `'"
ro:n. {
I'
.,aa,;.x A t V •a (; 1
"kiR
a -..1.4./. .-:.
4 / T $ t' i • r
..�., : ` , ,:RIGHTO } 4 '' i i
vk� ' > 'l x 2.5 o `,- "'
•
ro r
-1 dL5.x'dt', uhs§M1 ry rsf --a% w&.i 'a ,.. ..w ..«.n.k
q,- P
.
T .
Yom'. '+,ad₹
r~ T
5-s xs > y . :,.....i.. .., ,4,5 a., 5.a
•
4 C • €`s ' .. ,L s'$ ...r" _+ �i-0...1t.a''s'_ t "s•�i,♦,• yy, x• z J;;;•4 ₹
: , •r i• ni Y K` a4 # P'µ ;:k p•'''' ,r,'.',..":;;;;,.4;;;
...:y}.} 'I.' rl. K B E
R r'^rv'4•a d « } s v
.#f' L...b {y k.."%P1 ,,'.t�»a+ aR ,e.A ,,: £F tr¢ • £ 'i `%' L ts'd F.'.
P
aq * d s 3 } t'
,
r 4
s.,y a # r ex's gy "'-?''., w ;� .k,41P 1 f "yk j r
{ aT **•1,1
• *' �° k 'sr 3rs^3�a (a4 $ g +i' ai� AR'f+K.5 l k'ro'E$.
�� 'res P;# k 3: ' " ,� -S'rY r warm!.r r✓( 4�>_ >, y5" a�•
1��k:t .
� Wet _ A •I. •''
7� ��SM4�1i1 Valk,
Kri. �`
�'�" ' 4 ka*2a,;e M i j r e r ;2'6' ^f '�,A S_ d
a i'$ .CgQ'+'9b,• 4i —tt xt .e.
-'4-";,:t4.E.tr'' , .',..W24,-44.'"•:4",;:.;•,".• .",:",.. . 44;
-. % x Y,: as ."';'-'”•"...e'4.(1.4.4n, x, w} ( 4 er. ,n".,,.-•.w,•...,
....
_.�y� ad* x.! ur. ay,,,x,,sg.�E.e, 'sw p '� s t 1. zy :L :
1,,,.;:e;44-7.%"..T1.
iiink • v• ff .A�1 'it w x+IIIIIIIIS"r• £ a 'x40'"4, ' t j.:--:-
t s r ' t{ '
t n�. ,.
4 p '' °L`ta' x .w`'d ' "3' sw �„ ` b...4,444, -,,,,,y^`
c'Cii nHi . K * m,�,44. '.+ , dy A.° '.' " a" ":: r :r .rt'.y�� "# s�' ,' auae}.Ae
x: •y ie' is ,. , r ..„ R,, ., ^x . ..,.yam,,,y Y IT-7..•,,71.. ► `I F" Y Y Ir 1
T&s�. {r'. s e 4n A y �< § 1 x P"`
g:�i , rc ,{ }.�
7r: t *•a -..:r. e" A ;y V..di T•FN RP,y
i } ,.p .. ?,s ,'''b?;.; + ' a -'4 ; r� 10"..r.....7,;...'r '*' ��4 s
-'. •
. YwF�R,q a
. „ ,:•. R'+°' _ • ty s: .01.' ✓ r 5 ..,, B r
RS " $
'a} ets,',�� "1s* }
I NG
—*CONTRACTING
Jno.
Section 23-2-160
Item B
Project: Foster Equipment
Re: Warranty Deed
Attached hereto is a copy of the deed identifying the ownership of the property.
General Contracting • Consulting • Design/Build • Construction Management
300 Madison Avenue Loveland • Colorado 80537 . 970.669.3077 . Fax: 970.669.2183
www.kingcontracting.com email: kci@frii.com
1 111111 11111 11111 11111 I1111111111111111111IIII II l
3379575 04/17/2006 Oo..2A Weld County, CO
575 1 of 2 R 11.00 D 22.52 Steve Moreno Clerk& Recorder
WARRANTY DEED
THIS DEED,Made this 10'"day of April,2006,between
Linda Allen
of the said City of Greeley and County of Weld, State of Colorado,grantor,and
Neal D.Foster and Judith A.Foster
Whose legal address is,2813 Cortina Lane,Evergreen,Colorado 80439,grantee:
WITNESSETH,That the grantor for and in consideration of the sum of Two Hundred Twenty Five
Thousand Two Hundred Forty Three and 03/100($225,243.03)DOLLARS,the receipt and sufficiency of which
is hereby acknowledged,has granted,bargained,sold and conveyed,and by these presents does grant,bargain,
sell,convey and confirm,unto the grantee,his heirs and assigns forever,all the real property together with
improvements, if any, situate,lying and being in the County of Summit and State of Colorado described as
follows:
See Attached Exhibit"A"
as known by street and number as:
assessor's schedule or parcel number: 147130400103
TOGETHER with all and singular the hereditaments and appurtenances thereto belonging,or in anywise
appertaining,and the reversion and reversions,remainders,rents,issues and profits thereof,and all the estate,
right title, interest, claim and demand whatsoever of the grantor,either in law or equity,of,in and to the above
bargained premises,with the hereditaments and appurtenances.
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the said premises above bargained and described,with the appurtenances,unto
the grantee,his heirs and assigns forever.And the grantor,for himself,his heirs, and personal representatives,
does covenant, grant,bargain, and agree to and with the grantee,his heirs, an assigns,that at the time of the
ensealing and delivery of these presents,he is well seized of the premises above conveyed,has good, sure,
perfect,absolute and indefeasible estate of inheritance,in law, in fee simple,and has good right,full power and
lawful authority to grant,bargain, sell and convey the same in manner and form as aforesaid,and that the same
are free and clear from all former and other grants,bargains,sales,liens,taxes,assessments,encumbrances and
restrictions of whatever kind or nature soever, except
General taxes for the year 2006 and subsequent years and subject to easements,restrictions,reservations,
covenants and rights of way of record,if any.
The grantor shall and will WARRANT AND FOREVER DEFEND the above-bargained premises in the quiet
and peaceable possession of the grantee,his heirs and assigns,against all and every person or persons lawfully
claiming the whole or any part thereof. The singular number shall include the plural,the plural the singular,and
the use of any gender shall be applicable to all genders.
IN WITNESS WHFREOF,the grantor has executed this deed on the date setforth above.
� rc. lo L7Jt_4Dm
Linda Allen
STATE OU9L O
County of-N.,le _�,yr�s✓
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on April 10,2006 by Linda Allen
My Commission Expires: '9-2 b'-26 O5 Witness my hand and official seal.
MARY SCHWAB
NOTARY PUBLIC
STATE OF COLORADO -56-111-2__MY COMMISSION EXPIRES 9128120(18
Nota _ P blic
1 11111 IIIII IIIII IIIII 111111111111 ��III III IIIII till IIII
3379575 04/17/2006 09:12A Weld County, CO
2 of 2 R 11.00 D 22.52 Steve Moreno Clerk& Recorder
EXHIBIT A
Lot A of Corrected Recorded Exemption No. 1471-30-4-RE470 and a portion of the
Southeast Quarter of Section 30, Township 1 North,Range 66 West of the 6's P.M., Weld
County, Colorado,being more particularly described as follows:
BEGINNING at the Southeast corner of said Section 30,Township 1 North, Range 66
West of the 6th P.M.,thence North 90°00'00"West 1324.18 feet along the South line of
said Southeast Quarter to the Southwest Corner of the Southeast Quarter of said
Southeast Quarter;thence departing said South line North 00°03'26" West 30.00 feet to a
point on the Northerly Right of Way of Weld County Road 4, said point also being the
Southwest Corner of said Lot A and the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING;thence along
said Northerly Right of Way and departing said Southwest Corner North 90°00'00" West
14.23 feet; thence departing said Right of Way North 00°07'51"West 382.95 feet; thence
South 89°59'44" East 14.74 fcct,more or less to a point on the West line of said Lot A
said point also being on the West line of the Southeast Quarter of said Southeast Quarter;
thence along said West line North 00°03'21"West 30.79 feet, more or less to the
Northwest Corner of said Lot A;thence departing said West line and along the Northerly
and Easterly boundary of said Lot A the following(6) courses and distances South
89°59'57" East 434.80 feet;thence South 184.80 feet; thence South 29°35'37"West
68.16 feet;thence Southl6°35'37" West 161.38 feet; thence West 23.88 feet;thence
South 15.00 feet, more or less to a point on the said Northerly Right of Way line; thence
along said Northerly Right of Way North 90°00'00"West 330.77 feet; to the TRUE
POINT OF BEGINNING.
Said Parcel Contains 4.00 Acres, Morn: Or Loss, And Is Subject To All Existing
Easements And/or Rights Of Way Of Record.
AFFIDAVIT OF INTEREST OWNERS
MINERALS AND/OR SUBSURFACE
Property Legal Description: See Attached
Parcel Number 1 4 7 1 - 3 0 - 4 - 0 0 - 1 0 3
(12 digit number-found on Tax I.D.information,obtainable at the Weld County Assessor's Office,orwww.co.weld.co.us).
(Include all lots being included in the application area, If additional space is required,attach an additional sheet)
STATE OF COLORADO
)ss.
COUNTY OF WELD
THE UNDERSIGNED, being first duly sworn, states that to the best of his or her knowledge, the attached list
is a true and accurate list of the names and addresses of all mineral owners and lessees of mineral owners on or under
the parcel of land being considered. The list shall be prepared from the real property records by a person qualified
to do the task, and shall be current as of a date more than thirty(30)days prior to the date the application is submitted
to the Department of Planning Services. Note:Mineral Notification is in addition to that required by C.R.S.24-65.5-102
through 104.
•
By:
By: w
Title: 42Ovu^i Title:
The foregoing instrument was subscribed and sworn to me this ' .C day of ,ft, Toti* . a C. c".l
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
My Commission Expires: -'A`.-o`h
Notary Public
-14-
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
OWNER
FOSTER PROPERTIES, INC.
Lot A of Corrected Recorded Exemption No. 1471-30-4-RE470 and a portion of the
Southeast Quarter of Section 30,Township 1 North, Range 66 West of the 6th P.M., Weld
County, Colorado, being more particularly described as follows:
BEGINNING at the Southeast corner of said Section 30, Township 1 North, Range 66
West of the 6th P.M., thence North 90°00'00" West 1324.18 feet along the South line of
said Southeast Quarter to the Southwest Corner of the Southeast Quarter of said
Southeast Quarter; thence departing said South line North 00°03'26" West 30.00 feet to a
point on the Northerly Right of Way of Weld County Road 4, said point also being the
Southwest Corner of said Lot A and the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence along
said Northerly Right of Way and departing said Southwest Corner North 90°00'00" West
14.23 feet; thence departing said Right of Way North 00°07'51" West 382.95 feet; thence
South 89°59'44"East 14.74 feet, more or less to a point on the West line of said Lot A
said point also being on the West line of the Southeast Quarter of said Southeast Quarter;
thence along said West line North 00°03'21" West 30.79 feet, more or less to the
Northwest Corner of said Lot A; thence departing said West line and along the Northerly
and Easterly boundary of said Lot A the following (6)courses and distances South
89°59'57" East 434.80 feet; thence South 184.80 feet; thence South 29°35'37" West
68.16 feet; thence South16°35'37" West 161.38 feet; thence West 23.88 feet; thence
South 15.00 feet, more or less to a point on the said Northerly Right of Way line; thence
along said Northerly Right of Way North 90°00'00" West 330.77 feet; to the TRUE
POINT OF BEGINNING.
Said Parcel Contains 4.00 Acres,More Or Less, And Is Subject To All Existing
Easements And/or Rights Of Way Of Record.
•
Weld County Planning Commission
Attention: Michelle Martin
January 19, 2007
Page 3
Surface Mining.
Neal D. Foster and Judith A. Foster are the owners of the property's mineral rights.
They have no intentions of mining minerals.
Sincerely,
Neal s er J Foster
CC Randy King, Building Contractor
b, J County Planning Department
SMITH:InST BUILDING
Neal and Judith Foster JAN 3 0 2007
Foster&Foster LLC
12739 Weld County Road 4 R E L.ci VED
Brighton, Colorado 80603
January 19, 2007
Weld County Planning Commission
Attention: Michelle Martin
4209 CR24.5
Longmont, CO 80504
Dear Ms. Martin:
Subject: Case Number SPR-407; Parcel Number: 1471 30 400103; Site Plan
Review for office building for heavy equipment sales, service warehouse
and maintenance building for heavy equipment.
This letter is in response to your request for additional information relative to the Site
Plan Review plat. Our Company is involved with the sales of new and used concrete
related construction equipment. Consequently, the accumulation of disposable wastes
are minimal.
Wastes Expected to be Generated on Site.
Typical wastes generated by selling and servicing heavy equipment includes cardboard,
shipping containers (sometimes reinforced by wood and disposed of in trash barrels
located inside of shop), engine oil (100 gallons/yr.), lubricating grease (25 lbs./yr.),
batteries (12/yr.), and some general office trash that is not recycled (portable trash barrels
—kept inside shop—placed outside on trash pickup days)emptied twice a month. The
engine oil, lubricating grease, batteries, and trash are picked up and properly disposed of
by our suppliers listed below.
Raptor Used Oil Recovery
4440 Navajo Court
Greeley, CO 80634
970 346-8208
Product: Used Oil & Grease
Weld County Planning Commission
Attention: Michelle Martin
January 19, 2007
Page 2
Interstate Batteries
300 Willow
Ft. Collins, CO 80524
970 484-1307
Product: Used Batteries
Waste Management of Denver
PO Box 1238
Englewood, CO 80150
303 797-1600
Product: Trash Barrel Waste
Requirements of the Colorado Department of Transportation.
Access from WCR 4 to US 85 does not have a negative effect on our business. We are
aware of CDOT's US 85 Access Control Plan which shows WCR 4 is to become a 34
access in an interim condition with it ultimately being closed to US 85 in the long term.
This should have minimum effect on our business; however, it could have a negative
effect on property values.
Requirements of the Office of the State Engineer, Division of Water Resources.
Well No. 116824 is currently permitted for drinking and sanitary purposes only in an
individual commercial business. Our Site Plan will be revised to exclude trees, bushes
and plants.
Requirement—Brighton Fire Protection District
1. We acknowledge that all construction drawings will be submitted to the greater
Brighton Fire District for approval.
2. The signage as requested is shown on sheets A1.1 and A3.1.
3. Spray painting operations are not performed in this facility.
r
Weld County Planning Commission
Attention: Michelle Martin
January 19, 2007
Page 3
Surface Mining.
Neal D. Foster and Judith A. Foster are the owners of the property's mineral rights.
They have no intentions of mining minerals.
Sincerely,
Neal s er J Foster
CC Randy King, Building Contractor
_A. ....
- 4, - (rliNG-
CONTRACTING
.90.e.
Section 23-2-160
Item F
Project: Foster Equipment
Re: Well Permit 116824
Attached hereto is a copy of the well completion and pump installation report for
the potable water supply on this project. The location of the well is shown on the
attached drawing.
General Contracting • Consulting • Design/Build • Construction Management
300 Madison Avenue Loveland • Colorado 80537 • 970.669.3077 . Fax: 970.669.2183
www.kingcontracting.com email: kci@frii.com
_26.77 .. ,, .
COLORADO DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES
THIS FORM MUST BE SUBMITTED - 1313 Sherman Street - Room 818
WITHIN 60 DAYS:OF COMPLETION Denver, Colorado 80203
OF THE WORK DESCRIBED HERE-
ON.TYPE OR PRINT IN BLACK WELL COMPLETION AND PUMP INSTALLATION REPORT .,
INK. PERMIT NUMBER w --
WELL OWNER. OVA B'imams 8B' Y.of the a 'A of Sec.
ADDRESS 6N bat S no T. I tior?rb R. 66 6 P.M.
DATE COMPLETED g 4 a1oolo. �8Q • 1y9 Ss HOLE DIAMETER
"• WELL LOG
_/$ in.from frill—to_WI—ft.
Water 12
in. from tO
FCgm To.,., Type and Color of Material - Loc.
A) Sg 0.6, in. from to , ft.
DRILLING METHOD a
Ip►1 '8L1 &OWsiol CASING RECORD: Plain Casing
• 20 20 .> ., .S' Size _4 & kind Pim from _CI._to 2S ..`1t..
.23 ;0; wawa Size & kind from to ft.
' ' -•• Size _ & kind from to. "'ft.
Perforated Casing
Size 4s_& kind __ from ___25 to _14_ft.
Size & kind from _ to • ft.
Size & kind from to _ ft.
GROUTING RECORD
Material
Intervals TOP DOM 108
Placement Method Mill
GRAVEL PACK; Size t lO pa
Interval
TEST DATA
a6Isn ,s -
Date Tested
. 11644 124
Static Water Level Prior to Test _ ft
boiler
Type of Test Pump
abs
Length of Test
I 12 Opt[
$5 Sustained Yield (Metered)
TOTAL DEPTH IS►
Use additional pages necessary to.cpmplete log. Final Pumping Water Level
E 'd ()LES '1N • ' op }uawdinb3 Ja}soj AVIE t1 9006 '8l 'Inf •
OCT-04-06 14:42 FROM-DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES 3038662223 T-173 P.02/05 F-556
— 1
I ✓
y WR-S-6rs.. 76 COLORADO DIVISION OF WATER RE AD VEDI_
318 Centennial Oldg-, 1313 Sherman St.,Diner,Calp/Y R980 .
SEP 2 51980
PERMIT APPLICATION FORM UM MUM
Application must;
IMF ENGINEER
be complete where; I ) A PERMIT TO USE GROUND wATENIR Maga - int
implicadld. Type or, ( IA PERMIT TOCONSTRUCTA WELL a
print in BLACK: FOR: I ) A PERMIT TO INSTALL A PUMP • .
I Is,No overstrikes
or erasures unless', ( ) REPLACEMENT FOR NO.
initiaied. I 1 OTHER
WATER COURT CASE NO.-CO APPLICANT mailing address FOR OFFICE USE ONLY: DI:JOT WRITE IN THIS COLUMN
NAME Sietl a(Z A Ov cue 0 t Receipt No.4 /�t el l 'lJc/
STREET ?IagT E. 10416 ✓'I Ve. Basin Din.
CITY NeAdQ`.<OALI (Still)LN . FI'OG Q -12101 f`.nNDITLQNSOF APPROVAL
TELEPHONE NO. PoIRR - (09(8 !Pane 227-2326- This well shall be used in such a way as to cause
woc no material injury to existing water rights. The
12) LOCATION-OF PROPOSED WELL issuance of the permit does not assure the applicant
that no injury will occur to another vested water
right or preclude another owner of a vested water
County Wei Ci right from seeking relief in a civil court action.
SE _% of the SE• %,Section SO APPBOTSD PO INOT TO CBS 1973, 37-92-802,
(11(c) FOR DRINKING AND SANITARY
Twp. I ;. Rng- Lip U.? • 10 1 P.M. FACILITTIES ONLY IN AN INDIVIDUAL -
J '"•$' 's w1 CONKGROIAL RUSI86SS.
13) WATER USE AND WELL DATA AVERAGE DAILY APPROPRIATION FROM THIS WELL
SHALL NOT EXCEED 300 GALLONS,
Proposed maximum pimping rate(gpm Sl /
Average annual empunt of ground water PERMIT EXPIRATION DATE EXTENDED VVV
to be appropriated iacre-feed: / 4reC — F°°4 — TO: April 20, 1983.
Romper of acres MOO irrigated: ID
Proposed total depth heed: VG'
Aquifer ground wafter is to be obtained from: -
Owners well designation —
GROUND WATER TO BE USED FOR:
I Ltioustriot.o USE ONLY -no ur(gation 101
I a'I DOMESTIC Ili 1 1 INDUSTRIAL 151
I I LIVESTOCK (2) ( ) IRRIGATION 161
I I COMMERCIAL 141 I I MUNICIPAL (B)
I I OTHER 191 APPLICATION APPROVED
DETAIL THE;USE ON BACK IN 111) rr��
PERMIT NUMBED C.1164 J
IC pRILLI R j C
DATE ISSUED
Name ' If 14 ceni C " EXPIRA1 ATE 0CT 20 1982
Street 'IIIII.
•
City immt IS A N 1
I (auu) Izla)
BY
Telephone No. - Lir.No.
LO. F02- COUNTY 2
- -
OCT-04-06 14:42 FROµ-DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES 3038662223 T-173 P.03/05 F-556
-- - 1
•
(5) THE LOCATION OF THE PROPOSED WELL and the area on (6) THE_WF,.I Mt1$T BE LOCATEQ @ELQW' .
which the water,will be used must be indicated on the diagram below. by distances from section Ilnes.
Use the CENTER SECTION it section, 840 acres),for the well location. It -
60 it.from SOU sec.line,
-t- - 1- - -1+ -- 1-- — + — + —h — -+ — 4- C (none or login)
I 14--1 MILE.57;80 FEET—alI 9 sse f.from FP�H1"wwen) see.One
t + - -i- + t -1- + 1- LOT - BLOCK FILING e —
I r I I
SUBDIVISION
* — — NORTH SECTION LINE — —
I I I I (7) TRACT Oa WHICH WEL . WILL 8E
LOCATED Owner: S. R-RNci u le '
NORTH
+ ' a, — + — — 1-- 4 t No. of acres 4 Mora-as _ . Wi11 MIS be
I o I I I I me only well on this treat? y es
4- —P Fs! +- — -4-
(8) PROPOSED CASING PROGRAM
I I r I Mein Casing
+ -I— S — ± — -- -4- - m + i- 6 in. from 6 tr.to .1p ft.
I I I I
Y in from ft.to ft.
+ SOUTH S CTION LINE — —I-
- . f in.
casing
I
I COT in, from .30 ft. to ea O ft.
i- + t + 4 `T 4 + + in,from . ft to It
I
I I I I (9) FOR REPLACEMENT NIEL LS Shea distance
1 R and direction From old well and plans for plugging
Y- -- -1- — - — -I- — t — - - — -I- — -- — 4- it:
Thel.scale of the diagram is 2 inches= 1 mile -
Efach small square represents 40 acres.
WATER EQUIVALENTS TABLE IRounaed F.gureal
An attbtool cpven 1 acre or land 1 loot deep
1 cubic loot pp Second loth . 449 gallons par minute Igpml
A family or 5 will require apprws'mope 1 acrieloot of water par year
1 sae-foot.. 143.560 c,m,e rat .326.900 gallons
1.000 gem pulped commimusly for one day produces 4.42 ataelem.
(1G) Leap ON %li I-tlCHp GROUND WATER WILL BE USED.
Ownerrii: .54-e be AA oat./#'''-IA,.I-. �l No.of acres- a• 454-1
Legal description: See ailse-Apd De c ctititr t
(11) QrTAI LEQ QE$CRIPTION of me use of ground wafer: Household use and demonic wells mutt indicate type of disposal
system tabs used-- e Ilse Ls/,'// /7e, dam esii'.a:, f,or& fm./efa A., aLA).CA,it9-
Ctd 4 ,Ic ,`..e: . As.. a A irr ,Auer), Bt /0 peopleriva4rn11 stink tue&t.
(12)QTHER WATFD RIGbT$ used on This land. Including wells. Give Registration and Water Court Case Numbers.
Type or right Used for(purpose) Description of land on which used
C.e.OP xtL1jS-5 41
•
03) THE APPLICANT(S) STATE(S) THAT THE INFORMATION SET FORTH HEREON IS
TRUE TO HE BEST OF HIS KNOWLEDGE.
/
f�ro, aGr, i�.ci'
SIGIPXTUR OF APPr(reANT(SI
Use additional sheets of paper it more Space is required
OCT-04-06 14:42 FROM-DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES 3038662223 T-173 P.04/05 F-556
IN THR WATER COURT IN AND FOR
WATER DIVISION I, STATE OF COLORADO
CASE NO. W-611
IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION FOR)
WATER RIGHTS OF )) FINDINGS DITHE REFEREE
RULING
STEVE BRANCUCCI )
:THIS CLAIM, having been filed with the Water Clerk, Water
Divijion I, on February 25, 1971, and being heard on the 27th day
of O?tober, A.D. 1971, at the hour of 10:00 A.M. , and the Referee
being fully advised in the premises, does hereby find :
1. All notices required by law of the filing of this
application have been fulfilled, and the Referee has Jurisdiction
of this application.
2. No statement of opposition to said application has
been filed, and the time for filing such statement has expired.
3. The name and address of the applicant is:
Steve Brancucci
8120 E. 104 Avenue
Henderson, Colorado 80640
4. The name of the structure :
Well No. I-801997
Well No. 2-801998
Well No. 3-810285
Well No. 4-810288
5. The legal description of the structure :
Well No. 1-801997: North 200 feet; West 435 feet;
from se Cor. , Section 30, TIN,
R66W of the 6W P.M. , Weld County,
Colorado.
Well No. 2-801998: North 25 feet; West 833 feet;
from SE Cor. , Section 30, TIN,
R66W of the 6:h P.M. , Weld County,
Colorado.
Well No. 3-[10265: North 1325 feet; West 165 feet;
from SE Car. , Section 30, TIN,
R66W of rho 6m P.M. , Weld County,
Colorado.
Well No. 4-1110'286; South 663 feet• West 43 foot ;
from NE Cor. , Section 30, TIN,
R66W of the 6m P.M. , Weld County,
Colorado.
6. The source of water is: Groundwater for all wells.
7. The date of appropriation:
Well No. 1-801997 December 31, 1911
Well. No. •?-R01998 May 31, 1937
OCT-04-06 14:42 FROM-DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES 3038662223 T-173 P.O5/O5 F-556
•
Well No. 3-R10.285 April 30, 1934
Well No. 4-1210.386 May 51, 1936
8. The amount of water claimed:
Wall No. 1-Ro1997 1.80 cubic feet per second
Well No. 2-801998 2.34 cubic feet per second
Well No. 3-810285 1.80 cubic feet per second
Well No. 4-810386 2.50 cubic feet per second
9. The dse of the water is:
Well No. 1-110199^ Irrigation of approximately
26 acres in the SE3i of the
SE% of Section 30, TIN, 866W
of the 6m P.N. , Weld County,
Colorado.
Well No. 2—H01998 Irrigation of approximately
26 acres in the SES6 of the
• SCM of Section 30, TIN, 1168W
of the 6* P.M. , Wald County,
Colorado.
Well No. 3-1110285 Irrigation of approximately
35 acres in the NE3i of the
•
5E14 of Section 30, TIN, 1t66W
of the 615 P.M. , Weld County,
Colorado.
Well. No. 4-R10286 Irrigation of approximately
27 acres in the NE4 of the
NE14 of Section 30, TIN, 966W
•
of the 6m P.M. , Weld County,
Colorado.
• IVHEREFYPRE, the Water Referee rules that Steve 8rancucci be
awarded a priority on Well No. 1-R01997 of December 31, 1911, for
1.8a! cubic feet per second for irrigation purposes; a priority on
Well; No. 2-901998 of May .31 , 1937, for 2.34 cubic feet per second
for irrigation purposes; a priority on Well No. 3-R1028S of April
0, 1954 , for 1.80 cubic feet per second for irrigation purposes;
and a priority on Well No. 4-110286 of May Al . 1936, for 2.50
cubic feet per second for irrigation purposes.
AVM) this p21 day of November, 1971.
l,8cu.c.c.
Thomas J. Aron, r. ,Water eteree
Water Divlaton I, State of Colorado
No protest waft filed In this matter.
•
The Farseeing ruling 13 confirmed
• and approve , mod is made the
Judgment 'Decree of tats Court.
octant fe e /q 7
•
er ^ L
- al . I, INC",
CONTRACTINGa .940
Section 23-2-160
Item G
Project: Foster Equipment
Re: Sewage Disposal
Attached hereto is a copy of the letter from Earth Engineering Consultants
verifying the site is capable of supporting a septic system.
General Contracting • Consulting • Design/Build • Construction Management
300 Madison Avenue Loveland • Colorado 80537 • 970.669.3077 . Fax: 970.669.2183
www.kingcontracting.com email: kci@frii.com
C
. ..
t,
August 3, 2006 EARTH ENGINEERING
CONSULTANTS, INc.
King Contracting
300 Madison Avenue
Loveland, Colorado 80537
Attn: Mr. Randy King
Re: Geotechnical Subsurface Exploration Report
Foster Equipment Buildings
Brighton, Colorado
EEC Project No. 1062100
Mr. King:
Enclosed, herewith, are the results of the geotechnical subsurface exploration completed
by Earth Engineering Consultants, Inc. personnel for the proposed office and shop
buildings for Foster Equipment in Brighton, Colorado. In summary, the subsurface soils
encountered in the test borings consisted of granular and essentially granular soil with
low potential for swelling with increased moisture content at current moisture and density
conditions. Groundwater was not encountered in the test borings.
Based on the results of our field and laboratory testing, it is our opinion the proposed
lightly loaded metal buildings could be supported on conventional footing foundations
bearing in the near surface granular soils. The in-situ soils could also be used for direct
support of floor slabs and pavements. Geotechnical recommendations concerning design
and construction of foundations and support of floor slabs and pavements are presented in
the text of the attached report.
Percolation tests in the in-situ site soils showed percolation rates faster than acceptable
for use of a conventional absorption field. We believe processing of the clayey sands on
the site could be considered to develop an area with acceptable percolation for
subsequent use with a conventional absorption field.
4396 GREENFIELD DRIVE
WINDSOR, COLORADO 80550
(970) 224-1522 FAX (970) 663-0282
Earth Engineering Consultants,Inc.
EEC Project No. 1062100
August 3,2006
Page 2
We appreciate the opportunity to be of service to you on this project. If you have any
questions concerning the enclosed information, or if we can be of further service to you
in any other way,please do not hesitate to contact us.
Very truly yours,
Earth Engineering Consultants,Inc.
Lester L. Litton, P.E.
Principal Engineer
LLL/dmh
Hello