The URL can be used to link to this page

Browse Search

Home My WebLink About20071164.tiff Town of Mead L%Y�II► , � I P.O.Box 626 441 Third Street Mead"A Little Town Mead,Colorado 80542-0626 Mil a Big Fume- (970)535-4477 April 5, 2007 • CERTIFIED MAIL# 7005 3110 0002 9815 6442 Weld County Board of Commissioners P.O. Box 758 Greeley, CO 80632 RE: Request for Comments and Recommendations on the Annexation of the Sorrento Estates Annexation No.s 1 Through 4. Gentlemen: Enclosed is a copy of the application, annexation maps and other supporting material for the proposed annexation of the Sorrento Estates Annexation No.s 1 through 4, to the Town of Mead. This property is located in Weld County on approximately 160 acres at the Southeast corner of WCR 5 and WCR 32. the properties designated for "low-density" residential development in the area comprehensive plan. The concept plan for the development of the property calls for 175 single-family lots on the property. Property in the immediate area consists of large lot county subdivisions and agricultural land.. The purpose of this referral is to obtain the comments and recommendations of various governmental agencies and service providers as to the appropriateness of the annexation. Your comments are welcome and will assist the Board of Trustees and Planning Commission in their review of the proposal. We ask that your comments reach us no later than May 9, 2007. We ask that you forward your response directly to Samson, Pipis & Marsh, LLC, c/o Gary West, P.O. Box 1079, Longmont, CO 80502. Thank you for your cooperation and assistance. Verytruly yours, ickky Candace Bridgwater Town Clerk Referral Letter-Sorrento Annexation wpd 414/07(1:53 am) j", D)( nj 50 CM P\ )3-5 l l ( 2007-1164 L.art 0mar jc6-3)9_6252 February 6, 2007 Project No. LIBER-7A8B-01-200 Board of Trustees (MIL,ado 80537 Town of Mead 441 Third Street P.O. Box 626 Mead, Colorado 80542 RE: Sorrento Addition Annexation and Zoning Honorable Board of Trustees: On behalf of Liberty Properties LLLP, we respectfully request your review and consideration of the proposed 161.83 acre Sorrento Addition Annexation, located at the southeast corner of Weld County Road 5 and Weld County Road 32. The proposed zoning for the development is Low Density Estate Residential (LDER). The property is located one and a half miles west of 1-25 and a half mile north of Highway 66. It is bounded by County Road 32 (Future Adams Avenue) on the north; County Road 5 (Future 1-25 Parallel Arterial) on the west; Eden's Reserve PUD on the east and vacant farm land to the south. This property is centrally located in a region of significant growth, which has placed greater transportation demands on both highway corridors. To relieve the pressure of the increased local traffic, arterial roadway classifications have been given to County Road 32 (Adams Avenue) and County Road 5. Included in the Sorrento Addition Annexation is the provision to annex 3.64 acres of offsite right-of-way for the future Adams Avenue, as well as right-of-way for the 1-25 Parallel Arterial that will run along County Road 5. The ±158 acre site development area of the Sorrento Addition includes: • 94.04 acres of low density estate residential use; • 23.15 acres of interior road right of way; and, • 37.51 acres of open space/park land which also includes: o a 6.45 acre community recreation center site, o 11.68 acres of active play area, o 19.37 acres of bufferyards, drainage ways, and recreational/detention pond area. We appreciate your time and look forward to working with the Town of Mead on this exciting development Please contact us if you have any questions or need clarification on the enclosed Annexation submittal information. Respectfully submitted, LANDMARK ENGINEERING LTD � gisatudintt, Tiffane Johnson Project Manager TJ/tv • PETITION FOR ANNEXATION TO: THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF MEAD, COLORADO: (I/We), , the undersigned landowner(s), in accordance with Colorado law, hereby petition the Town of Mead and its Board of Trustees for annexation to the Town of Mead of the following described unincorporated territory located in the County of Weld and State of Colorado, to-wit: As part of this petition, your petitioner further states to the Board of Trustees of Mead, Colorado, that: 1. It is desirable and necessary that the territory described be annexed to the Town of Mead. 2. The requirements of C.R.S. sections 31-12-104 and 31-12-105, as amended, exist or have been met in that: a. Not less than one-sixth of the perimeter of the area proposed to be annexed is contiguous with the Town of Mead or will be contiguous with the Town of Mead within such time as required by 31-12-104. b. A community of interest exists between the area proposed to be annexed and the Town of Mead. c. The area proposed to be annexed is urban or will be urbanized in the near future. d. The area proposed to be annexed is integrated with or is capable of being integrated with the Town of Mead. e. No land within the boundary of the territory proposed to be annexed which is held in identical ownership, whether consisting of one tract or parcel of real estate or two or more contiguous tracts or parcels of real estate, has been divided into separate parts or parcels without the written consent of the landowner or landowners thereof, unless such tracts or parcels were separated by a dedicated street, road or other public way. f. No land within the boundary of the area proposed to be annexed which is held in identical ownership, comprises twenty acres or more, and which, together with the buildings and improvements situated thereon has an assessed value in excess of two hundred thousand dollars ($200,000.00) for ad valorem tax purposes for the year next preceding the annexation, has been included within the area proposed to be annexed without the written consent of the landowner or landowners. g. No annexation proceedings have been commenced for any portion of the territory proposed to be annexed for the annexation of such territory to another municipality. h. The annexation of the territory proposed to be annexed will not result in the detachment of area from any school district. i. The annexation of the territory proposed to be annexed will not have the effect of extending the boundary of the Town of Mead more than three miles in any direction from any point of the boundary of the Town of Mead in any one year. j. Prior to completion of the annexation of the territory proposed to be annexed, the Town of Mead will have in place a plan for that area,which generally describes the proposed: Location, character, and extent of streets, subways, bridges, waterways, waterfronts, parkways, playgrounds, squares, parks, aviation fields, other public ways, grounds, open spaces, public utilities, and terminals for water, light, sanitation, transportation, and power to be provided by the Town of Mead; and the proposed land uses for the area; such plan to be updated at least once annually. Annexation Pebtion October 26.1995 1 • k. In establishing the boundary of the territory proposed to be annexed, if a portion of a platted street or alley is to be annexed, the entire width of the street or alley has been included within the territory to be annexed. The Town of Mead will not deny reasonable access to any landowners, owners of any easement, or the owners of any franchise adjoining any platted street • or alley which is to be annexed to the Town of Mead but is not bounded on both sides by the Town of Mead. 3. The owners of more than fif ty percent of the area proposed to be annexed, exclusive of dedicated streets and alleys, have signed this petition and hereby petition for annexation of such territory. 4. Accompanying this petition are four copies of an annexation map containing the information following: a. A written legal description of the boundaries of the area proposed to be annexed; b. A map showing the boundary or the area proposed to be annexed, said map prepared and containing the seal of a registered engineer; c. Within the annexation boundary map, a showing of the location of each ownership tract in unplatted land and, if part or all of the area is platted, the boundaries and the plat numbers of plots or of lots and blocks; d. Next to the boundary of the area proposed to be annexed, a drawing of the contiguous boundary of the Town of Mead and the contiguous boundary of any other municipality abutting the area proposed to be annexed, and a showing of the dimensions of such contiguous boundaries. 5. Upon the Annexation Ordinance becoming effective, all lands within the area proposed to be annexed will become subject to all ordinances, rules and regulations of the Town of Mead, except for general property taxes of the Town of Mead which shall become effective as the January 1 next ensuing. 6. The zoning classification (land use) requested for the area proposed to be annexed is Low Density Residential .05-1 Dwelling Unit per acre in Performance District 1. • WHEREFORE, the following petitioner respectfully requests that the Town of Mead, acting through its Board of Trustees, approve the annexation of the area proposed to be annexed. By this acknowledgment, the undersigned hereby certify that the above information is complete and true. (If the applicant is not the owner(s) of the subject property, the owner(s), mortgage and/or lienholder shall also sign the Application.) Applicant: r ^,+, �, rs, l L i P Date: 5 j � r%-• Owners ei[th it / Lt ��`�rpt J�..n lilr`I61. o-�r,•f" (r nDate: I 7 k If 1-- 1 .. 7- C' STATE OF COLORADO ) Y J SS. COUNTY OF The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 7 day of / letcet'-t , 200 '7 by i'14/1;I CI 4 Y✓ict. My commission expires:c 00.4' Witness My hand and official seal. i / �, • // 'Notary Public --- `yN ANDCf,R • gr.'• ••••so u: NOTARY Is Annexation Petition October 2.:993 • • lcti+•.OFp PUBLIC•.�: 2 . . ,O?: NyCommission Exviros^9n" ^e Owner: Date: STATE OF COLORADO ) SS. COUNTY OF S&utlt The forego'''ng instrumentwas acknowledged before me this aj day of rft,C,h 200 1' by r .j &x1&cn My commis ion expires: Witness My hand and official seal. 0,Q2uitnv A _auAO .o ary Public �r��1EYG ‘,1 %0 1/4' R�t°yo5' f fJ. ff9` f8 o`Oixt i , commission Expires 08!15/09 Annexation Petibon October 26,1995 3 Landowner/Petitioner Date Signed Legal Description Mailing Address of Land Owned Kenneth A. Williamson, See Exhibit A General Partner 4068 Camelot Circle Longmont, Colorado 80504 Annexation Petition October 26,1995 4 EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION Parcel No. 1: The East One-Half of the following described parcel: That portion of the Northwest Quarter of Section 21,Township 3 North, Range 68 West of the 6th P.M.,Weld County, Colorado, more particularly described as follows: Considering the East line of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 21 as bearing South 00 degrees 01'00" East, and with all bearings contained herein relative thereto; Beginning at the Northwest Corner of said Section 21; thence along the North line of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 21, North 89 degrees 2327" East, 2639.36 feet to the North Quarter Corner of said Section 21: thence along the East line of said Northwest Quarter, South 00 degrees 01'00" East, 360.05 feet to the most Northerly Corner of that certain tract of land as described in Deed recorded in Book 228 at Page 105, records of said Weld County;thence along the Northwesterly and Westerly lines of said tract the following two (2) courses and distances: (1) South 20 degrees 2226"West, 143.50 feet(record S. 21 degrees 19'W., 143'); (2) South 00 degrees 01'00" East, 2158.00 feet to the South line of said Northwest Quarter from which the Center of said Section 21 bears North 89 degrees 23'45" East, 50.00 feet; Thence along said South line,South 89 degrees 23'45"West,2591.57 feet to the West Quarter Corner of said Section 21;thence along the West line of said Northwest Quarter, North 00 degrees 01'52"East,2651.04 feet to the Point of Beginning. Parcel No. 2: The West One-Half of the following described parcel: That portion of the Northwest Quarter of Section 21,Township 3 North, Range 68 West of the 6th P.M.,Weld County, Colorado, more particularly described as follows: Considering the East line of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 21 as bearing South 00 degrees 01'00" East, and with all bearings contained herein relative thereto; Beginning at the Northwest Corner of said Section 21; thence along the North line of the Northwest Quarter • of said Section 21, North 89 degrees 23'27" East, 2639.36 feet to the North Quarter Corner of said Section 21; thence along the East line of said Northwest Quarter, South 00 degrees 01'00" East, 360.05 feet to the most Northerly Corner of that certain tract of land as described in Deed recorded in Book 228 at Page 105, records of said Weld County;thence along the Northwesterly and Westerly lines of said tract the following two (2) courses and distances: (1) South 20 degrees 2226" West, 143.50 feet(record S. 21 degrees 19W., 143'); (2) South 00 degrees 01'00" East, 2158.00 feet to the South line of said Northwest Quarter from which the Center of said Section 21 bears North 89 degrees 23'45" East, 50.00 feet; Thence along said South line, South 89 degrees 23'45"West,2591.57 feet to the West Quarter Corner of said Section 21;thence along the West line of said Northwest Quarter, North 00 degrees 01'52"East,2651.04 feet Annexation Petition October 26,1995 5 TOWN OF MEAD LAND USE CODE FORM D-2 PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICATION AND DECISION RECORD FOR A LAND USE CHANGE OF MAJOR IMPACT Name of Subdivision: Sorrento Estates Annexation Applicable Section(s): Copies Required: 44 A. Preliminary Plat Submission Requirements. 1. Applicant's name, address and telephone number: Property Owner/Applicant Owner's Representative Liberty Properties, LLLP Landmark Engineering 4068 Camelot Circle 3521 West Eisenhower Blvd. Longmont, Colorado 80504 Loveland, CO 80537 Contact: Ken & Connie Williamson Contact: Tiffane Johnson/Ken Merritt 970-535-6074 970-667-6286 2. Legal description of the property proposed for the land use change: (See attached Legal Description) 3. Proposed land use change located in Mead Performance District No. 1 . 4. Give a brief nonlegal description of the existing land use of the site and of the general character of the use of adjacent lands. (See attached exhibit) 5. Give a brief nonlegal description of the proposed land use change including the number of living units, type of home occupation proposed, the placement of a mobile home, etc. (See attached exhibit) 6. Provide a sketch plan of the proposed land use change, including a site analysis consisting of a map, plot plan or diagram showing the total acreage, abutting landowners and land uses, streets, highways, utilities that will service the proposed development; and major physical features, including drainage and the location of natural hazards. [attach maps and sketches as necessary] (See attached exhibit) 7. A master development plan, if the land use change is proposed to be constructed in stages requiring separate reviews and approvals. (See attached exhibit) 8. Provide an elevation drawing of the proposed structure(s)showing height and describing the exterior materials. [attach drawings as necessary] (See attached exhibit) 9. The fiscal impact analysis, Form D-4. (See attached Form D-4) 10.Provide other information that the applicant believes will assist the Planning Commission and the Board of Trustees in making a fair decision. [attach additional sheets as necessary] (See attached exhibit) mead-02 Form LuGwpd 1/13/07(4 03 pm) Page 1 of 8 11.Signature of the Applicant: By this acknowledgment,the undersigned hereby certify that the above information is complete and true.(If the applicant is not the owner(s)of the subject property,the owner(s),mortgage and/or lienholder shall also sign the Application.) 4 F v'j- L.1_L P _x Owner/Applicant: ,is'�r r,-,`;' /6u f, L! PP /�� 2-rt.2t ,(, Date: -2 Zr Owner/A Owner: �p _ Date: 461 l-r��ldc�•' /" _ t�l /� >� 5 ! 9 STATE OF COLORADO ) / ( c. ,jr"^ 6- lC SS. COUNTY OF 4 ;]kr\ ) tThe foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this / day of i Y)r r(' 4't , 2007 by 1 Ant-( 6l -A Will,Il, n-1,1`:/^r"4 My commission expires: Li.- .2S -.iuc,Y: M.96-.- Witness My hand and official seal. ••4, ? 5/ :ter [. p,11 (�.r k? t /pre ell NOTARY �x Notary Public ay PUBLIC STATE OF COLORADO ) Nh,Commission Esping:OW ** SS. COUNTY OF (,Ur Irk ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 5 day of AL,/ , • l,i , 20 C. y by My commission expires: t sr s; " Witftess My hand and official seal,. 0;.::..F i /Notary Public - i —i-- PUBLIC *****************APPLICANT NOT TO WRI . 'y w' LINE*****"************* B. Review Agency Comments. �rCammbdeoExplm.'09t2812008 1. Building Official: 2. Town Engineer: 3. Town Attorney: 4. Other Referrals: Mead-02 Form LUC.wad 1/13/07(4.03 pm) Page 2 of 7 C. Further information requested, if any: D. Action by the Planning Commission: 1. The application is complete. Yes O No❑ 2. The application is for a Major Land Use Change. Yes ❑ No❑ 3. The requirements of the Mead Land Use Code have been satisfied. Yes❑ No❑ 4. If the application is for the annexation of property, has the annexation question benn submitted to,and approved by the electorate? Yes O No❑ 5. The application is: ❑ approved ❑ disapproved ❑ approved with the following conditions: a) b) c) (attach additional conditions as necessary) DONE by the Mead Planning Commission of Mead, Colorado,this_day of , 2p_. ATTEST: Secretary to the Commission Chairman E. Action by the Board of Trustees. 1. The application is complete. Yes ❑ No O 2. The application is for a Major Land Use Change. Yes O No❑ 3. The requirements of the Mead Land Use Code have been satisfied. Yes O No ❑ 4. The application is: ❑ approved ❑ disapproved ❑ approved with the following conditions: a) b) Mead-02 Form Luc.wpd 1/13/07(4.03 pm) Page 3 of 7 c) (attach additional conditions as necessary) DONE by the Mead Board of Trustees of Mead, Colorado, this_day of , 20 ATTEST: Town Clerk Mayor Mead-n2 Form LUC wpd 1113/07(4'.03 pm) Page 4 of 7 • FORM D-2 (continued) EXHIBIT PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICATION AND DECISION RECORD FOR A LAND USE CHANGE OF MAJOR IMPACT 2. Legal description of the property proposed for the land use change: Parcel No. 1: The East One-Half of the following described parcel: That portion of the Northwest Quarter of Section 21, Township 3 North, Range 68 West of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado, more particularly described as follows: Considering the East line of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 21 as bearing South 00 degrees 01'00" East, and with all bearings contained herein relative thereto; Beginning at the Northwest Corner of said Section 21; thence along the North line of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 21, North 89 degrees 23'27" East, 2639.36 feet to the North Quarter Corner of said Section 21: thence along the East line of said Northwest Quarter, South 00 degrees 01'00" East, 360.05 feet to the most Northerly Corner of that certain tract of land as described in Deed recorded in Book 228 at Page 105, records of said Weld County; thence along the Northwesterly and Westerly lines of said tract the following two (2) courses and distances: (1) South 20 degrees 2226"West, 143.50 feet (record S. 21 degrees 19'W., 143'); (2) South 00 degrees 01'00" East, 2158.00 feet to the South line of said Northwest Quarter from which the Center of said Section 21 bears North 89 degrees 23'45" East, 50.00 feet; Thence along said South line, South 89 degrees 23'45"West, 2591.57 feet to the West Quarter Corner of said Section 21; thence along the West line of said Northwest Quarter, North 00 degrees 01'52" East, 2651.04 feet to the Point of Beginning. Parcel No. 2: The West One-Half of the following described parcel: That portion of the Northwest Quarter of Section 21, Township 3 North, Range 68 West of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado, more particularly described as follows: Considering the East line of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 21 as bearing South 00 degrees 01'00" East, and with all bearings contained herein relative thereto; Beginning at the Northwest Corner of said Section 21; thence along the North line of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 21, North 89 degrees 2327" East, 2639.36 feet to the North Quarter Corner of said Section 21; thence along the East line of said Northwest Quarter, South 00 degrees 01'00" East, 360.05 feet to the most Northerly Corner of that certain tract of land as described in Deed recorded in Mead-D2 Form LUC.wpd 1/13/07(4:03 pm) Page 5 of 8 Book 228 at Page 105, records of said Weld County; thence along the Northwesterly and Westerly lines of said tract the following two (2)courses and distances. (1) South 20 degrees 2226"West, 143.50 feet (record S. 21 degrees 19W., 143'); (2) South 00 degrees 01'00" East, 2158.00 feet to the South line of said Northwest Quarter from which the Center of said Section 21 bears North 89 degrees 23'45" East, 50.00 feet; Thence along said South line, South 89 degrees 23'45"West, 2591.57 feet to the West Quarter Corner of said Section 21; thence along the West line of said Northwest Quarter, North 00 degrees 01'52" East, 2651.04 feet 3. Proposed land use change located in Mead Performance District No. _ 1 . 4. Give a brief nonlegal description of the existing land use of the site and of the general character of the use of adjacent lands. Sorrento Estates Annexation is 156+/- acre parcel located southwest of Mead, a half mile north of Highway 66 and one and a half mile west of 1-25. The property is bound on the north by County Road 32 and vacant farm land; on the east by Greater Western Railroad, a private residence and Edens Reserve PUD; to the south by farmland; and to the west by Weld County Road 5 (future 1-25 Parallel Arterial) and farmland. This site is unique due to its proximity to the intense development occurring in nearby City of Longmont, the Town of Mead, and Weld County's MUD District. In addition to being located near these urbanizing areas, the western boundary of the property is the future 1-25 Parallel Arterial Road. 5. Give a brief nonlegal description of the proposed land use change including the number of living units, type of home occupation proposed, the placement of a mobile home, etc. Sorrento Estates PUD is low density estate residential community with 175 lots complemented by a neighborhood recreation center. The average lot size within the Sorrento Estates PUD will be 23,408 square feet (0.54 acres). The single family estate lots will be arranged along curvilinear tree line streets and quite cul-de-sacs and will include custom and semi-custom homes each with a unique architectural style. Approximately 37.51 acres of park and open space will be dedicated with the Sorrento Estates development in the form of parks and play areas (11.68 ac), bufferyards (4.56 ac), greenbelts (14.81 ac) and a 40,000 square foot recreation center(6.45 ac). The size and location of parks, open play areas and greenbelts will provide pedestrian access for children and will encourage safe walking and bicycling routes with minimized street crossings. All lots within the Sorrento Estates development back to park or openspace. The neighborhood recreation center has been centrally located in order to provide easy access to and from neighborhoods. The recreation center is intended to be a meeting place for the development to encourage interaction with neighbors. The recreation center is primarily intended for the Sorrento PUD residents however, will also be available to the public through membership. The 40,000 square foot recreation center building may house community offices, restaurant and health club, a gathering space, mini-library, game room, and media room. Additionally, a community pool, tot lot play area, play fields, barbeque pits and picnic areas will be located adjacent to the recreation center building. Mead-D2 Form LUC wpd 1/13/07(4:03 pm) Page 6 of 8 Once the 100th building permit has been issued construction of the neighborhood recreation center shall begin. Sales of 100 lots within the Sorrento development will allow the developer to gain the necessary capital to build the recreation center and associated infrastructure. In addition to the economic feasibility needed to make construction viable, the Sorrento community will need to be effectively established and able to support and maintain a recreation center with so many amenities. 6. Provide a sketch plan of the proposed land use change,including a site analysis consisting of a map,plot plan or diagram showing the total acreage,abutting landowners and land uses,streets,highways,utilities that will service the proposed development; and major physical features, including drainage and the location of natural hazards. See Concept Plan. 7. A master development plan, if the land use change is proposed to be constructed in stages requiring separate reviews and approvals. The platting of the Sorrento Estates Annexation will occur in a single phase however, it is anticipated that construction may occur in three phases as depicted on the Concept Plan. At this time a construction sequencing plan has not been prepared. 8. Provide an elevation drawing of the proposed structure(s) showing height and describing the exterior materials. The homes will be custom and semi-custom homes, each with a unique architectural style. Site design and architectural standards will allow for individuality, while maintaining a common theme that provide continuity throughout the development by incorporating architectural features,material,color,landscape, and fencing. 9. The fiscal impact analysis, Form D-4. Included. 10. Provide other information that the applicant believes will assist the Planning Commission and the Board of Trustees in making a fair decision. The Sorrento Estates Annexation and PUD is consistent with the goals and objectives in the Town of Mead Comprehensive Plan because it creates a community that meets the needs of Mead's diverse population by complementing the existing housing market with a low density residential estate lot development and community recreation center. Sorrento Estates PUD will be unique due to its proximity to the intense development occurring in the surrounding area and its adjacency to the 1-25 Parallel Arterial (County Road 5), Adams Avenue (an arterial) and close proximity to the 1-25 and Highway 66 Corridors. The Sorrento Estates PUD will offer a transportation network including local, collector and arterial roadways adjacent to and within the site to ensure adequate access and safe vehicular, bicycle, and pedestrian movement. This location offers an opportunity to create a neighborhood that encourages connectivity, protects view corridors to the West,provides open space and recreational amenities,and will provide quality residential housing that will create a neighborhood worth coming home to. The development contains single family estate lots complemented by a neighborhood recreation center designed to invite neighbors to share in the community experience and encourage active lifestyles. Mead-D2 Form LUC wpd 1113107(4'.03 pm) Page 7 of 8 The Sorrento Estates PUD will establish an effective visual transition with low density housing(0.5 to 1.0 dwelling units per acre)as identified on the"Land Use Plan" creating a semi-rural gateway as you travel toward the 1-25 parallel arterial. The Sorrento Estates PUD will offer a$3.8 million dollar fiscal benefit to the Town of Mead from revenues (one-time and recurring) including but not limited to; property tax, building permits, transportation, open space, police protection, municipal facilities, park system, recreation center, downtown revitalization, capital equipment, street maintenance, storm water and drainage. mead-oz Form LUC wpd 1/13/07(0:03 pm) Page 8 of 8 TOWN OF MEAD LAND USE CODE FORM D-4 FISCAL ANALYSIS (Required for all Preliminary and Final Applications) (for Major Land Use Changes) Applicable Section(s): Copies Required: 44 Applicant's name,address and telephone number: Property Owner/Applicant Owner's Representative Liberty Properties, LLLP Landmark Engineering 4068 Camelot Circle West Eisenhower Blvd. Longmont, Colorado 80504 Loveland, CO 80537 Contact: Ken & Connie Williamson Contact: Tiffane Johnson/Ken Merritt 970-535-6074 970.667-6286 Name of the Project: Sorrento Addition REVENUES. A. Recurring Revenues: 1. Property Tax. Market value all single family units[ $750,000 x 175 units 1j11 x factor[ 7.96 % 112' =Assessed Valuation f$10,447,500.001 Market value all multi-family units[ - 1111 x factor[ 7.96 % 1(2)=Assessed Valuation [ N/A 1 Market value all mobile home units[ - 1111 x factor f 7.96 % 1(21= Assessed Valuation f N/A 1 Market value all non-residential structures [4,000,0001111 x factor( 29% 1(21 =Assessed Valuation [$1,160,000.00 1 Total Assessed Valuation r$11,607,500.00 1 Total Assessed Valuation[ 11.607.5001x Town mill levy f 8.919 mills 113)= Town Property Tax Revenue 1 [$103,527.00 Total Assessed Valuation f 11,607,500]x St. Vrain School mill levy[ 39.982 mills 1(3) =School Property Tax Revenue [$464,091.00 1 Total Assessed Valuation[ 11,607,5001 x Mt. View Fire District mill levy( 8.037 mills 113)= Fire District Property Tax Revenue [ $93,289.00 1 °1 Developer's projected market value. (2'Call county assessor to determine what factor to use in order to obtain current assessed value of proposed development from market value in the area. 12)Contact the Town Clerk for current factors. Mead.o.Fom,Luc Revised 1.3I-06..yd January 31,2006 Page 1 of 6 Total Assessed Valuation [$11,607,500]x Weld County mill levy[ 17.900 mills ](3)= County Property Tax Revenue f$207,775.00] Total Assessed Valuation f$11,607,500]x St.Vrain San. Dist. mill levy[ 3.918 mills 1(31 = St. Vrain San. Dist. Tax Revenue [$45,478.00 ] Total Assessed Valuation f 11,607,500]x all other mill levies f 4.503 mills ]I'1 = Other Property Tax Revenue f$52,268.00 ] Total Property Tax Revenue f$966,428.00] 2. Sales Tax. Population in the development[438]x the last year's per capita collection [ $48.46 1(31 = total annual sales tax revenue [$21,225.00] Estimated gross retail sales within the development [$250,000 1x 2%P) = total annual sales tax revenue [$5,000 ] 3. Sewer Revenue. Population in the development f - ]x the last year's per capita collection f $75.21 ]13) = total annual sewer revenue [ N/A 1 4. Other Revenue (taxes, fees, permits, etc.). Population in the development[438 Ix the last year's per capita collection f $65.80 ]13j = total other revenue [$28,820.00] Nonresidential- business licenses, liquor licenses, etc.l'1 = total annual other revenue f N/A TOTAL RECURRING REVENUE f $55,045.00 ] B. One-Time Revenues. 1. Building Permits. Market value of structure(s) [$131,250,000.001(1)x factor J .0099375 + $30.00/BP ]1'1= building permit revenue [$1,309,547.001 2. Use Taxes. Market value of structure(s) [$131,250,000.001(11 x 50% x 2% = use tax revenue [$1,312,500.00] 3. Sewer Plant Investment. Total taps x factor[ $6,000.00 F '=total PIF [ N/A ] (')Developer's projected market value. (2)Call county assessor to determine what factor to use in order to obtain current assessed value of proposed development from market value in the area. 131 Contact the Town Clerk for current factors. Mad-n.4 Form LUC Revised I-31-06.wpd January 31,2006 Page 2 of 6 4. Storm drainage. Number of dwelling units[ ]x$131 = residential storm drainage impact fees [ N/A Square feet of nonresidential development[ - ] x $0.08/sq.ft. =nonresidential storm drainage impact fees [ N/A ] 5. Transportation. Number of dwelling units [ 175]x$1,350 = residential transportation impact fees [$236,250.00 ] Square feet of nonresidential development[40,0001 x $0.37/sq.ft. = nonresidential transportation impact fees [$14,800.00 6. Open Space. Number of dwelling units[ 175]x$1,852 = residential open space impact fees [$324,100.00 Square feet of nonresidential development[40,000] x $0.47/sq.ft. = nonresidential open space impact fees [$18,800.00 ] 7. Police Protection. Number of dwelling units[ 175 175 1x$50 = residential police protection impact fees [$8,750.00 ] Square feet of nonresidential development[40,0001 x$0.01/sq.ft. = nonresidential police protection impact fees [$400.00 1 8. Municipal Facilities. Number of dwelling units[ 175 ]x$1, 697 = residential municipal facilities impact fees [$296,975.001 Square feet of nonresidential development f 40,000 ] x $0.43!sq.ft. = nonresidential municipal facilities impact fees [$17,200.00 9. Park System. Number of dwelling units[ 175 ]x$462 = residential park system impact fees [ $80,850.00 ] 10. Recreation Center. Number of dwelling units[ 175 ]x$1, 683 = residential recreation center impact fees [$294,525.00 ] 19 Developer's projected market value. (a Call county assessor to determine what factor to use in order to obtain current assessed value of proposed development from market value in the area. Contact the Town Clerk for current factors. Mead-D.4 Form LUC-Revised Ian.06.wpdJanuary 31,2006 Page 3 of 6 11. Downtown Revitalization (public facilities). Number of dwelling units[1751 x $304 = residential downtown revitalization impact fees [ $53,200.001 12. Capital Equipment. Number of dwelling units[ 175 lx$316 = residential capital equipment impact fees [$55,300.001 Square feet of nonresidential development[40,0001 x $0.09/sq.ft. = nonresidential capital equipment impact fees [$3,600.001 TOTAL ONE TIME REVENUE [$4,026,797.001 II. EXPENDITURES. A. Recurring Costs. 1. Street Maintenance. Acres in development[ 1571x 4% x factor[ $2,287.00 ]13) = total street maintenance costs [$14,362.001 2. Police Protection. Projected population at full development( 438 1 x per capita cost of police protection ( $23.87 1t3j = total police protection costs [$10,455.001 Square feet of nonresidential development( - 1 x [ - 1a1 = nonresidential police protection costs [ N/A 1 3. General Government. Projected population at full development[438 J x per capita cost of general government[ $87.18 1"' = total general government costs [ $38,185.001 Square feet of nonresidential development[ - 1 x [ - 10) = nonresidential general government costs [ N/A 1 4. Parks and Recreation. Projected population at full development[438 1 x per capita cost of park maintenance[$10.00 1131 = total park maintenance costs I$4,380.00 1 5. Sewer Collection and Treatment. Projected population at full development[ - 1 x per capita cost of sewer collection and 111 Developer's projected market value. is Call county assessor to determine what factor to use in order to obtain current assessed value of proposed development from market value in the area. 13)Contact the Town Clerk for current factors. Mead.D-4 Form LUG Revised 1-31.06.wpd January 31,2006 Page 4 of 6 treatment( $100.20 1(31= total sewer costs [ N/A 1 6. Storm Water and Drainage. Projected population at full development[ - x per capita cost of storm water and drainage maintenance ( - 1(31 = total storm water costs ( N/A Square feet of nonresidential development( - 1 x [ - 131= nonresidential storm water costs ( N/A TOTAL RECURRING COSTS ($67,382.00] B. One-Time Costs. 1. Park and Recreation. Projected population at full development( 438 1 x .001 facilities per capita x 5,000 sq.ft.x average cost per sq.ft. for recreation facilities J $65.00 V31 = total recreation facilities costs [$142,350.00 ) 2. Sewer Plant. Projected population at full development[ - 1 x gallons per capita( 120 gal. 1" x cost per gallon of capacity( $3.50 V3 = total cost of sewer plant ( N/A 1 TOTAL ONE-TIME COSTS ($142,350.001 TOTAL RECURRING REVENUES ($55,045.00 1 TOTAL RECURRING EXPENDITURES ($67,382.00 1 DIFFERENCE (NET FISCAL DEFICIT) [($12,337.00) 1 TOTAL ONE-TIME REVENUES I.$4,026,797.00 1 TOTAL ONE-TIME EXPENDITURES I.$142,350.00 1 DIFFERENCE (NET FISCAL BENEFIT) ( $3,884,447.001 ************************************************************************* Page 5 of 6 III. Signature of the Applicant. By this acknowledgment, the undersigned hereby certify that the above information is complete and true. (If the applicant is not the owner(s) of the subject property, the owner(s), mortgage and/or lienholder shall also sign the Application.), .-1 I / 272 404)-A,247(1477.Owner Applica : 4.17 E 7✓/{/r//Lei �Z ut L lDate: •g 7 Owner: Date: 3"-C C 7 STATE OF COLORADO) j�7 7 G>o. ties(_7 COUNTY OF ti;ai<( ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this / day of vry'tr,,c 1, 1 , 20 C 7/ by h, A 14 'rtL' c• ;7�<.,, ;� My commission expires: '/ 3 _„2c: r M. nF ., Witness My hand and official seal. � ��•' Rs'• " lit./ /1 / , /flVII 1 . v ' OJ NOTARY •.z• Notary Public : . PUBLIC STATE OF COLORADO) %.13s• &CO ... SS. MyCaaYNnion Es • COUNTY OF 1,7 ) Phe5:0978?^^0 The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this f day of )V''t r::r , 20 ! 7 by ' • s„ My commission expires: i Witness My hand and official seal. i^? .1,7; vY j--?y',�_1 .•• ANON. •. SIN-.......q . Notary Public ��: e . •O° NOTARY •• �s uyi PUBLIC My Commission Expfa:08nl12000 In Developer's projected market value. la Call county assessor to detennine what factor to use in order to obtain current assessed value of proposed development from market value in the area. n Contact the Town Clerk for current factors. Mnd-n4 Form LUG Rc.,s^d iII-06..pd January II,2006 Page 6 of 6 JA:, stewart title of colorado - Longmont Division 1729 Terry Street Longmont. CO 80501 303-651-1401 Office 303-651-1501 Fax Date: January 26, 2007 Our Ref: 200700032 To: Landmark Engineering Your Ref: NW4 21-3N-68 Attn: Tiffane Johnson Title Commitment American Land Title Association Commitment— 1982 TITLE INSURANCE COMMITMENT BY • stewa r t. —.title guaranty company • Order Number: 200700032 We agree to issue policy to you according to the terms of the Commitment. When we show the policy amount and your name as the proposed insured in Schedule A, this Commitment becomes effective as of the Commitment Date shown in Schedule A. If the Requirements shown in this Commitment have not been met within six months after the Commitment Date, our obligation under this Commitment will end. Also, our obligation under this Commitment will end when the Policy is issued and then our obligation to you will be under the Policy. Our obligation under this Commitment is limited by the following: The Provisions in Schedule A. The Requirements in Schedule B-I. The Exceptions in Schedule B-II. The Conditions on Page 2. This Commitment is not valid without SCHEDULE A and Sections I and II of SCHEDULE B. r.- THIS COMMITMENT IS NOT AN ABSTRACT, EXAMINATION, REPORT OR REPRESENTATION OF FACT OR f'.. TITLE AND DOES NOT CREATE AND SHALL NOT BE THE BASIS OF ANY CLAIM FOR NEGLIGENCE, NEGLIGENT MISREPRESENTATION OR OTHER TORT CLAIM OR ACTION. THE SOLE LIABILITY OF COMPANY AND ITS TITLE INSURANCE AGENT SHALL ARISE UNDER AND BE GOVERNED BY PARAGRAPH 4 OF THE CONDITIONS. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Stewart Title Guaranty Company has caused its corporate name and seal to be hereunto affixed by its duly authorized officers on the date shown in Schedule A. stewart .title guaranty company /wir 91/15t1tr( ei�ee of 7ThAO nrd / mf,±'_* ea, t• °. 19 08 ?o rI President xt�YPSt� Countersigned: Stewart Title of Colorado- Longmont Division 1729 Terry Street Longmont,CO 80501 Agent ID# : 067289 • Order Number: 200700032 Page I of 2 Commitment-235 W/O Disclosure CONDITIONS 1. DEFINITIONS (a) "Mortgage" means mortgage, deed of trust or other security instrument. (b) "Public Records" means title records that five constructive notice of matters affecting your title — according to the state statutes where your land is located. 2. LATER DEFECTS The Exceptions in Schedule B — Section II may be amended to show any defects, liens or encumbrances that appear for the first time in the public records or are created or attached between the Commitment Date and the date on which all of the Requirements (a) and (c) of Schedule B — Section I are met. We shall have no liability to you because of this amendment. 3. EXISTING DEFECTS If any defects, liens or encumbrances existing at Commitment Date are not shown in Schedule B, we may amend Schedule B to shown them. If we do amend Schedule B to show these defects, liens or encumbrances, we shall be liable to you according to Paragraph 4 below unless you knew of this information and did not tell us about it in writing. 4. LIMITATION OF LIABILITY Our only obligation is to issue to you the policy referred to in this Commitment when you have met its Requirements. If we have any liability to you for any loss you incur because of an error in this Commitment, our liability will be limited to your actual loss caused by your relying on this Commitment when you acted in good faith to: Comply with the Requirements shown in Schedule B—Section I. or Eliminate with our written consent any Exceptions shown in Schedule B —Section II. We shall not be liable for more than the Policy Amount shown in Schedule A of this Commitment and our liability is subject to the terms of the Policy form to be issued to you. 5. CLAIMS MUST BE BASED ON THIS COMMITMENT Any claim whether or not based on negligence, which you may have against us concerning the title to the land must be based on this Commitment Order Number; 200700032 Page 2 of 2 Commitment—235 W/O Disclosure DISCLOSURES Pursuant to C.R.S. 10-1 1-122, notice is hereby given that: A. THE SUBJECT REAL PROPERTY MAY BE LOCATED IN A SPECIAL TAXING DISTRICT; B. A CERTIFICATE OF TAXES DUE LISTING EACH TAXING JURISDICTION SHALL BE OBTAINED FROM THE COUNTY TREASURER OR THE COUNTY TREASURER'S AUTHORIZED AGENT; C. INFORMATION REGARDING SPECIAL DISTRICTS AND THE BOUNDARIES OF SUCH DISTRICTS MAY BE OBTAINED FROM THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, THE COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER, OR THE COUNTY ASSESSOR NOTE: Colorado Division of Insurance Regulations 3-5-1, Paragraph C of Article VII requires that "Every title entity shall be responsible for all matters which appear of record prior to the time of recording whenever the title entity conducts the closing and is responsible for recording or filing of legal documents resulting from the transaction which was closed." Provided that Stewart Title of Colorado - Longmont Division conducts the closing of the insured transaction and is responsible for recording the legal documents from the transaction, exception number 5 will not appear on the Owner's Title Policy and the Lender's Title Policy when issued. NOTE: Affirmative Mechanic's Lien Protection for the Owner may be available (typically by deletion of Exception No. 4 of Schedule B, Section 2 of the Commitment from the Owner's Policy to be issued)upon compliance with the following conditions: A. The land described in Schedule A of this commitment must be a single-family residence, which includes a condominium or townhouse unit. B. No labor or materials have been furnished by mechanics or materialmen for purposes of construction on the land described in Schedule A of this Commitment within the past 6 months. C. The Company must receive an appropriate affidavit indemnifying the Company against unified Mechanic's and Materialmen's Liens. D. The Company must receive payment of the appropriate premium. E. If there has been construction, improvements or major repairs undertaken on the property to be purchased, within six months prior to the Date of the Commitment, the requirements to obtain coverage for unrecorded liens will include: disclosure of certain construction information; financial information as to the seller, the builder and/or the contractor; payment of the appropriate premium; filly executed Indemnity agreements satisfactory to the company; and, any additional requirements as may be necessary after an examination of the aforesaid information by the Company. No coverage will be given under any circumstances for labor or material for which the insured has contracted for or agreed to pay. NOTHING HEREIN CONTAINED WILL BE DEEMED TO OBLIGATE THE COMPANY TO PROVIDE ANY OF THE COVERAGES REFERRED TO HEREIN, UNLESS THE ABOVE CONDITIONS ARE FULLY SATISFIED. • order Number: 200700032 Stewart Title of Colorado-Longmont Di"i>ion Disclosures • DISCLOSURE Order No: 200700032 To comply with the provisions of C.R.S. 10-11-123, the Company makes the following disclosure: (a) That there is recorded evidence that a mineral estate has been severed, leased or otherwise conveyed from the surface estate and that there is a substantial likelihood that a third party holds some or all interest in oil, gas, other minerals, or geothermal energy in the property; and (b) That such mineral estate may include the right to enter and use the property without the surface owner's permission. Note: Order No:200700032 Stewart Title of Colorado-Longmont Division Mineral Disclosure Rev.07/2001 COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE • SCHEDULE A 1. Effective Date: January 18, 2007 at 7:45 a.m. Order No.: 200700032 2. Policy or Policies To Be Issued: Amount of Insurance (a) A.L.T.A. Owner's (Standard) 85,000.00 Proposed Insured: Commitment Only (b) A.L.T.A. Loan 3. The estate or interest in the land described or referred to in this Commitment and covered herein is: Fee Simple 4. Title to the Fee Simple estate or interest in said land is at the effective date hereof vested in: Liberty Properties LLLP 5. The land referred to in this Commitment is described as follows: See Attached Legal Description STATEMENT OF CHARGES These charges are clue and payable before a Policy can be issued: N/A Stewart Title Guaranty Company Conuniunent-Schedule A Page 1 of) Exhibit A LEGAL DESCRIPTION Order No.: 200700032 Parcel No. I: The East One-Half of the following described parcel: That portion of the Northwest Quarter of Section 21, Township 3 North, Range 68 West of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado, more particularly described as follows: Considering the East line of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 21 as bearing South 00 degrees 01' 00" East, and with all bearings contained herein relative thereto; Beginning at the Northwest Corner of said Section 21; thence along the North line of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 21, North 89 degrees 23' 27" East, 2639.36 feet to the North Quarter Corner of said Section 21; thence along the East line of said Northwest Quarter, South 00 degrees 01' 00" East, 360.05 feet to the most Northerly Corner of that certain tract of land as described in Deed recorded in Book 228 at Page 105, records of said Weld County; thence along the Northwesterly and Westerly lines of said tract the following two (2) courses and distances: (1) South 20 degrees 22' 26" West, 143.50 feet(record S. 21 degrees 19' W., 143'); (2) South 00 degrees 01' 00" East, 2158.00 feet to the South line of said Northwest Quarter from which the Center of said Section 21 bears North 89 degrees 23' 45" East, 50.00 feet; Thence along said South line, South 89 degrees 23' 45" West, 2591.57 feet to the West Quarter Corner of said Section 21; thence along the West line of said Northwest Quarter, North 00 degrees 01' 52" East, 2651.04 feet to the Point of Beginning. Parcel No. 2: The West One-Half of the following described parcel: That portion of the Northwest Quarter of Section 21, Township 3 North, Range 68 West of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado, more particularly described as follows: Considering the East line of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 21 as bearing South 00 degrees 01' 00" East, and with all bearings contained herein relative thereto; Beginning at the Northwest Corner of said Section 21; thence along the North line of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 21, North 89 degrees 23' 27" East, 2639.36 feet to the North Quarter Corner of said Section 21; thence along the East line of said Northwest Quarter, South 00 degrees 01' 00" East, 360.05 feet to the most Northerly Corner of that certain tract of land as described in Deed recorded in Book 228 at Page 105, records of said Weld County; thence along the Northwesterly and Westerly lines of said tract the following two (2) courses and distances: • Stewart Title Guaranty Company Commitment—Schedule A Page 2 or 3 (1) South 20 degrees 22' 26" West, 143.50 feet (record S. 21 degrees 19' W., 143'); • • (2) South 00 degrees 01' 00" East, 2158.00 feet to the South line of said Northwest Quarter from which the Center of said Section 21 bears North 89 degrees 23' 45" East, 50.00 feet; • Thence along said South line, South 89 degrees 23' 45" West, 2591 .57 feet to the West Quarter Corner of said Section 21; thence along the West line of said Northwest Quarter, North 00 degrees 01' 52" East, 2651.04 feet to the Point of Beginning. Stewart Title Guaranty Company Commitment—Schedule A Page 3 of 3 COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE SCHEDULE B—Section 1 REQUIREMENTS Order Number: 200700032 The following are the requirements to be complied with: (a) Payment to or for the account of the grantor(s) or mortgagor(s) of the full consideration for the estate or interest to be insured. (b) Proper instrument(s) creating the estate or interest to be insured must be executed and duly filed for record, to wit: None— Commitment Only C STEWART TITLE Order Number: 200700032 GUARANTY COMPANY Commitment—Schedule B I Page I of I kh' COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE E' SCHEDULE B—Section 2 EXCEPTIONS Order Number: 200700032 The policy or policies to be insured will contain exceptions to the following unless the same are disposed of to the satisfaction of the Company: 1. Rights or claims of parties in possession, not shown by the public records. 2. Easements, or claims of easements, not shown by the public records. any , which a 3. correctpancies,suney and nspection cts in of the remises would disclose, andndary lines, shortage in area, rwl ichlaresnotrshown by the public records. 4. Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor or material heretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by laws and not shown by the public records. 5. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, if any, created first appearing the public records or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof, but prior to the date the proposed insured acquires of record for value the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this commitment. 6. Unpatented mining claims, reservations or exceptions in patents, or an act authorizing the issuance thereof; water rights, claims or title to water. 7. 2007 taxes, a lien, not yet due or payable. 8. 2006 taxes, a lien, now due and payable. 9. The lien of any unpaid taxes or assessments against said land, if any. No examination has been made. 10. The Right of Way for railway in width and in manner and form as provided by Acts of Congress as reserved by Denver Pacific Railway and Telegraph Company in Deed recorded May 23, 1877 in Book 22, Page 68. 11. A Right of Way over a portion of said land as granted to Mountain States Telephone and Telegraph Company by instrument recorded May 7, 1930 in Book 894, Page 390. The route of said right of way is not described in said instrument. 12. A Right of Way over a portion of said land as granted to n Book 894, a Mountain e States Telephone and Telegraph Company by instrument recorded May 7, 1930 The route of said right of way is not described in said instrument. Order Number:200700032 STEWART TITLE GUARANTY COMPANY Commitment—Schedule B 2 , Page 1 of 2 13. A Right of Way over a portion of said land as granted to Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Company by • instrument recorded December 3, 1981 in Book 954 at Reception No. 1876097. The route of said right of way is not described in said instrument. 14. An Easement for Water Pipe Line over a portion of said land as granted to Kiteley Farms by instrument recorded January 14, 1983 in Book 986 at Reception No. 1914355. The route of said easement is more particularly described in said instrument. 15. An Easement over a portion of said land as granted to the Northern Colorado Water Conservancy District by instruments recorded March 28, 1996 in Book 1539 at Reception No. 2482998 and April 4, 1996 in Book 1540 at Reception No. 2484148. 16. Such rights as may exist in said land lying within Weld County Road 5 & 32. 17. Such rights as may exist in said land lying within any ditches, canals and/or reservoirs. 18. Any existing Leases and/or Tenancies. 19. Terms and Conditions as set forth in a Contract to Buy and Sell Real Estate dated March 21, 2005 by and between John Leonard Warner Trust and Liberty Properties, LLLP. 20. A Deed of Trust to secure an indebtedness in the original amount of S1,825,000.00, dated October 27, 2006, recorded November 3, 2006 as Reception No. 3432549. Grantor: Liberty Properties LLLP Trustee: Public Trustee of Weld County Beneficiary: Colorado Business Bank 21. A Deed of Trust to secure an indebtedness in the original amount of$1,346,762.00, dated October 27, 2006, recorded November 15, 2006 as Reception No. 3435014 and re-recorded December 26, 2006 as Reception No. 3443698. Grantor: Liberty Properties LLLP Trustee: Public Trustee of Weld County Beneficiary: Colorado Business Bank • STEWART TITLE Order Number:200700032 • GUARANTY COMPANY Commitment—Schedule B 2 Page 2 of 2 Privacy Policy Notice • PURPOSE OF THIS NOTICE Title V of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) generally prohibits any financial institution, directly or through its affiliates, from sharing nonpublic personal information about you with a nonaffiliated third party unless the institution provides you with a notice of its privacy policies and practices, such we are you e swith this o which as the type of information that it collects about you and the categories of persons or entities towhom it may be disclosed. In compliance with the GLBA, providing document, which notifies you of the privacy policies and practices of Stewart Title of Colorado -Longmont and Stewart Title Guaranty Company. We may collect nonpublic personal information about you from the following sources: • Information we receive from you, such as on applications or other forms. Information about your transactions we secure from our files, or from our affiliates or others.•• Information we receive from a consumer reporting agency. Information that we receive from others involved in your transaction, such as the real estate• agent or lender. Unless it is specifically stated othenvise in an amended Privacy Policy Notice, no additional nonpublic personal information will be collected about you. We may disclose any of the above information that we collect about our customers or former customers to our affiliates or to nonaffiliated third parties as permitted by law. r rs to the Wes of may disclose this nonaffiliated companies that 1perform marketing serviceson about our customers ro n our behalf or withwhom following e have types of non joint marketing agreements: Financial service providers such as companies engaged in banking, consumer finance, • securities and insurance. Non-financial companies such as envelope stuffers and other fulfillment service providers.• N UT YOU AWE DO NYONE NOT DISCLOSE AI\TY ANY PURPOSE THAT IS NOT SPECIFICALLY LIC I CPE�H O ED BYY LAW. WITH We restrict access to nonpublic personal n l information ation beuttyyou u to those We maintain es s who need to know that information in order to p products your nonpublic personal and procedural safeguards that comply with federal regulations to guard P information. • • In7oice 1 . Stewart Title of Colorado - Longmont Division DATE INVOICE# 1729 Terry Street , — _--- Longmont, CO 80501 1/26/2007 66 I r_-- --- LEGAL DESCRIPTION _ 1 ICI BILL TO � I N—W 4 21-3N-68,County of Weld, Aibnrty PropeJhs State of Colorado Attn:Tiffanc Johnson ' Ph. 970-667-6286 II I TERMS-�_.- P.O NUMB ER Net 30 Days _.- _. r._- -------- ITEM COD AMOUNT - -- -- -- - - DESCRIPTION - - -- -- � - - --- -- E 195 00 . Mist Commitment Only Fee 195 00 Mist; i Surrounding Property Report(I Hour a$100/Hour) , I I I I I , 1 I --- Total $295.00 Liberty Prop. I il jF Y ? ! I J % f l•"/-f[�� L�[ �. ft..f/.C•L [✓ fF /!yam i F _ • w� ! .. ... -. .. --.. �..n�?`i A c i L .,lie riJ- f ..s aXl.� _. .. v 5 st <+s i J. a ' '!Oa/ �c- r [�/-(.[iw/iu�t.,1.._. L.< 4;i2 t!irLeLa� a.el ..(<i..Laa rte . :. �-1 rs fJLa....[-tr --ya�.l ✓.uLi +/l,Ititi.2L?.4 iv YR✓ ._f4_iC ' / `I-�y Mle rv/ µ //J/ S Y ._ ,C,4'41.--, J / NI I/) w yy,+{� �trlwn..ra�./.' .4.ca7 --.-i "v.....i,. Ziy:. -. I �d '✓.lai d ! L ;"'- h `y.rk)s��r, r �t'H '? I Vn/ .t n-4 - L.y[4V .. _/L77 "'i '° f Tidy(-a4i:./u..u ?Yir.c<Ai_ .i.ti.;c• - !. .._ .h r.. ...• 1 . AA ... C...� ( .Ia L.J/ tfA L�.CLW. /i<. _. F .r bra,. �.i�.<y.. -_-.4a -t.✓ I•cl' n 1 T.'r�.'C.'4 T. ., a't 3L.,P. ca NG <. �/,. 7:-. tr( _I.t... i%...c.L�.e:.le to ./y +Y1«J'��,i'a*tia �T� �J v Ain I- ioL._e.a ii<...Za..t_o _...t/Z i .g.rf,s •'e s2� 'M„(i. yy -b.� ' .. .. .«� / yr Ci,}r7�.U•%%u . < -.c.<.<.(., /`' / '17-=1� -Lsc...r.,_y-i•et..t _rrLc.c..L e i i ' c..w_..<1_C.G a..�cf/.�Ca..-a..uw_ .1....� /ir_:G.�,. ...1_.f.�_.G`i-._«iJt<`.� tfc 1 s c<..�,..[t i .7 I/• _ � F Y 4 aL �_.<C iC Gq/ .c._l..ii<. _�c /c4 tY1" : .��./1e ,' cn�+aki a''..:4_ ,.- .1 :.'i<. S�.v✓,7./1( •L•Q- jj ' ' •n•<xd=a:Y'i , CRLi1� �✓I-f� /f f/�Ilt vi7. l 'Y .-tL.Z..�r,. ro. �..-<.r -h-<ifC )7 'Kr}.< ,, J&-'/E iL1 x..(.) y � (fr4•r-�•ti<a--.Cd/1�.-. �/� 4:0.•:-.•, I - ✓•_-iil./- r a�.1e- -..c -47: :6ktic c w. . 11 7j ? `1.2y. ,.( s i% r�r: I L `- • i9li«...[c.u.c.. ift yr;-t(" ".r "r i < a.a</ee./..1. v.. Y M ! C `Y =,4..+.._-!.w...a..<.�c y r & .11r.L...-._.ui.Ar." ..+J X . •u. 7}«� C.....s t.6.rri , - 1',..4.`"Ii ri,-4,...117,,:-.,-,:,.::4r . 9 . }i: 4,_n �<-y iG! .� SCl ' *yr�r �_e..uiu:..< ..w.vi.«. s`ia`- -�.. O i � .t'��ylik! yf/�, � .?3.w tP�t <S `syr'f"-"..�'�.'}, fox/i v. rl ' f�i .,ccu_a. i....a4FT.4..✓v_<a.Za r i`'j. '.t'r?'ehu , x -;} -�i'�Y s rk'a :�l4S.X�� y� V. ` --IC-Ai-Y.;f 1G..taL.y.LL'9 y::::; „/„�/4.t ._ .e• -K' �.7'as;tifi , ' la[�{�fti. . A 4 r 1S. g rsT�Hg • ♦f •—"--i s / [ 'fiy � Fio' "'�s< Y y. Lr ...,C' , }F77 ti F''+t ^ 1'Ffi -R t a .i..�,•, <e.. }� '7 P/1.j' -� KY{a .:4,.-;40:,-,,,-.W.PY �• �. i iz,atz� !Y ...4.. ,' Yy.` -•-• . `. ,M `r -tIs '�, �M. 1 ice" ' • -'-'t l.,_ -f �' .xse az.r',4" .f.n'rPi ,4N'�" ti•�z , to r '. �.` �L' <...(•s<..�iiii-te i7W S. ._ sdL -, �..r 1_.-G r[-•[mkt "C�it.,^.'r:.nl"s,..4 ., tv- . `''S G'n' f rrci+ .l�r`•" a i �r4 }?( o ryo 6�'t.t•< rrFT.:44'r .fe ��K,�Q0.L..d'fi"3#` < h'y-sus .-a4b�o +na.e?d,.eCwL�.t+ws./..-• z /rev^- « {qw • ".'" • )�• %5-f A ,v}�iT` Aa, j� 't5z4., yyi• f'^r...+.A.n„ . ,�wq.'ui`� Ea�ias-.,..t.. C =.tA. l•e; '#'°... -.+i_'an - C' hX r'S. 'L: "�`" a]e.. g `.1 5'��s r a S i_i • -0,.,..... �atn r " '4'-..a Y' .r_ � ,� y. �„on. / i ram 7 i . 1 } d p`se ik.i>� a • al�x•''YL>•^'.'Hi s..1.x ,44-.7.-;t4 .uL[ 4��£ skk,. - -s. 1tEit1 .a,iZ'iw .mac` . i�-ti3..A,--i +. 3'+ .. .,t.S. ba'L SY{ me..W�gqY.-�1;t+; .r.�' �n -.n.2La[ -'7p"°t5"u'.�.:3«.4L.i ih.1�`L' Lw. a 5 +rc'3- i .% v... dHIQ,lJ" t A K� araiy75'f- h� );, u?>s:1st,1 }, - _r .+,I • •Jy•. ' . It- 'i( h' 'h ' XC+•k � r pL - 't t1• "' MVFa+1 yl'_'�\i�°Ify`� ;f+a'C �qA�'?a ry.. y �t '1, of .r-S� t a> ,. \ . tCx.s `S�.• 3',`7 rS:44". t'L� 14' tIiaRC .Re�mt•/4'vr•-, .5+-'aa:AtTvR*�.� r1itt; �r�.1 �)y "+h fl:+ r 14t1°�. tyl, t Jl . .tpl » +. .v atrr el itri.: YjL1 I `'t-t v`'+t .< " r r?y . -LtR;-: C1 /e.s.., t At {a..21 -r:,,1/2J 11412.N'l'N} a ?c1} `�-..-`YS'-,c. '{4 1 I 1l;0 444. kl'4'. � r' y C li.,,-n�,,l , .3' 1♦ a. ' a f1 J (£-�yaz�r .r +.� �. Y..-- :/ 17: . l 4 *•�•1 iJ• ] +-/v °..(-1;a...:',..;•-•_ f :ytf, lvti. L: rk' I /,.. .Vl ee.el. alii..s�y. I:...`4-Y u! J✓✓ .J-. rl Li- -_ �.� . ._...e ,�.�.-,. .�.I <r � l• tF.i. j.�u� .� /La.I .(rt "C EFP'� t ' / /.. ,, `. . • - • i f ; - -.. [ .c.c....y+<.[ .,i.< / tt / I.✓ a. ..cL 47'rr1 r. �`JL�. 1 [�. i . .. .M i -1-42ti4.I (kae.c«' LC-4c.Grt..,'a e.s Y4ry y I'd,..�.. .✓✓. ..,.y 4;•{/:?2(1,;/ -• _...+•• ..t �r.ak lCt/:AZ am t .-•.'r,{'^S .LCw 1./:.t.. ..-.r , e .<.e /J /.........,47°-.:C4'-'1,•"."4;._.-..01; r . a.,u k• .4 :./--e, •r..1/ 4 -r.- : 7 ''�.VA le. `./.G c.!«L..-. ./.t, cC t4-td.+v <N t .p. „ tt V r er rt t .r r• xy}�•- f*kcc_ ✓ .:c�<.. ;II.el h' S++!Z+; ...( ,7 I.. 1e.._“t • et...,_G. + r Fdy'�Z rV•.W "!tir aY.. ,.J.. e./ [5✓1 )i4( {'•t-,.•� f 4 `• ++ ul- 4c .. ic. t' ✓.t.,a.e ii r/ GL: 1 :."' ;.1..1:1;g:1; .„46 . ` j 3 of cai_ a n ' / .4. ''.5".,Mr, .+1 f f I �'�,ey3��, ,F- -,,.e( .. L ./..--. /el '..a -<, a.c....V .Tammy t- ?.IC 1. ..t. ....r e( ,--, t. I - i CYC'- .,• s ia-e----,--- f_.v.. t..�...._ . ca._<--t '!<.- -ris.L.C-ttG �W...g " ..t '. „,/,...,..........<r...e...f ♦ iv .< I t uwvisl. " I e �.X 1•a.0 . a.: +ut.ef� �1 f?: s Ft �. . .S..,=4r d t^u.r4yy .al1Sl�� 'R� i i_a. -e its /J.se.. +.t,. •twrFrt? d 't"M.✓�ig., i ce.. tVi.° I ' tt c.Gai.<_.e. .u/ ,..eo,I [,F lL ,t.4 i_e.:e15.Glif✓.Gll •.w .Vt,cw-r4 •e I kli,� a t.I_i../ ./e,.m 1....,./ , ✓,..«.(N eGe..l 1 ry , ''G Jam• /!/ / 1 R`i l`'1�-ly,�+{"• ,'� rr R ..Q 4Qt ;Lvi:iY,° .C�eieia,.. F ..c-< < 1,, 11..?..;� i a", i''a+e4�• �� '5/2)1,/.4 .y � .:/._...-ee, t` -V1 'Zi'r ls' Y✓`e" '' :rt• [ ./ Lt,.t'....i -- /C ._,_!-J ,_ '{ LC e . f 'L,rl{t,�"'p'e•es,. p I -09.011‘.4.,w.,• .,-. tom. t . ./.+, it ,z-. ,,;..e., .;.L _. / '. . .1 i•/i .;',..we Ie./. ... ,U:.cwt. G/7...........>.a F.Y. `./_L.l..�... _' .e.✓. . ✓..'n...4„ v 11.01,14.:404W-....71., .� .1. .-.> ...+.I 'c �s.u. .-. !:f .-.< .. w l i +t• ;;y.�`.1.‘Y.'45/U:,C& .e.,—"a.f.. 1 .,w z•.,„- 1...._ n •9y�r-�++�4 1t .,rAz la—‘-' ;,�... . �:..t..c,.�.✓ e,lr ..t,t,� vtv.w.Gzt�aR SY+y�„'.a(. GvtK. t. F/_. e.. do•.�.a.. 1L 9�i ) { r_"v.. eyn...-a e. .e<.• „A......c(t e,tr.-...J,. • 4 • ' -4- a c .w a.._..r.I el ....a 4•'4 i rl•4• • //' / - iruc�ie2�d (/ 1 ".)i•t4.'1:1'. '..A.V.L a........✓ 4/ .....' ..tW .2r24-: Y✓„$Caf,..RL4I V.LLA/ . Ctc4 L! .L t ... )f1 rt�� • �'(L.(. ,-C.,./ Fe c .. IL 'r-.c.cc ad .'a..a..cc- +<L.-fie.'+.mac c. .�t.: •i.n...ee .770.,-."4:4.3.4v. �, , ,or -;,ii-- /S• . I I'- ,,,..144.,.. .,....2447,.. ✓.. - « . i....aaa. ./• c�; w-stlau� fg- .& cl /---9---. `'v..+..L• .,-+ a j1 t / t. _ i t './^ .G....<� .,.,•/1 ./ ✓ iir +.la«cat..} fi....t/ a t.a• /f.1.. 1. ,o,„,....;_.,„.„,..1sY'r },P-'(/I . (.- ,. ,.44 ...r % g [n ,,. 9 e..;...( r s I, . y. ._ 4 4 4 4 , r_u f ti.f� V...w. c .1,... "..- [ tt..aL_,/x1,44 I +.. .vey r±M .i "... i _- f..-.....,,' .,aa�/ IINJr 're✓e* .,/..t`.!...f„%re ta. k d .c..-t,. e t.•+ y'„'""s' R r 2'�'�l t.�. "u'�/cctGc.rJ rC; �` r� tit ..- .. _ :4444 . �+...a� . �,A. riJ'i ..x�;=(r}+.I.L.e : } .."' :k yi;,, Rmfr / , I A u r'I C _ 1: RJC..LC r•.t/.e aa.de.1;:t a4 1 .y,tr l„ � l.. ? R J } _.,..2- _'__ I "I"' ! t r'+,:,. /G"'Lt.."' 1..,, r( ... -v e,.-.+.- `�`, w 4C- u.C+ , ,s P i ,- y •. l W•/. / J r rx r/ r :1/2,-.• t.ea ,y .. I- -7: — :il;-"t/ .l 1114-i _«.i N�, ^.l} .2$1.4,144,14 .�M Lr[ lta.'f..7 .rAp,.1 r J' t a s n' f s . 4444 s.. S� •a'''s r . L-&' IS A-4-0444-1,;414-'4't✓,f.Ltf..l^ /Gael aL,C . a r ,�"'.%4 , >, a..,eT•s i' -•1 a at ` n 1.Q,.'''')).. rr..., y$1(,,, _[ : h 1 y.ry - ,y„•7w3Trtr u 4,..:€,ayk "AA T...Cf_l+rut aCR ."'r. � L#•1 iy Y,lt !t'�, etc ''.77 If .Pr { i(Co. • .�,YiS a i `St 0 tr r-c( f. r; "{'}v :-.•' ,..---,Y.'" X %< l�6KR ' �E� "..`s ' t• C �f, t)� `^t ] ' 1('.t'"� t X .nl4+ " �.�'i �� e� +�_r s iY�' iTrt (4.-t-..�''^w•..+./ tf`•! u.t_4C�,rL�Z.fe,. '.'$? f' w ( 4i t a L. z 4S .. t t y .F j�2.4Fi y f.t.T , -,9.),.. ,. �• l i .• .a ° �Srl ..hr • Y 74iddItt[. Y14 ✓ �Li `:9:. -.r.c. )/GRt" .'''o hi �!».y ;�yf �LL Y„rt•}/.. �..' „__j 1. • �' . • J ta p(f 5y• " Z_s.�fz yryei+f %►i.��' • s7 :it ^ ...+ r.g, aA d .s �rM.f( t 1 , ¢ 4,-,4,.„---, r ..u.re•5sx r W ia .' t�4 y + t + -4444.1.--A4 C ,• .re vtr --,..4.,...„.y�.. !t/,,((t �a4:c9IS. nisiri'3'y�}i T W �2 2g�. 't att� �h�y.• L,�•, n r .. ‹..• w4 ) R •'a s5..Y. it: t 44 'i �Ar^k.5: r if a+ dais +� 1 � '''F ,d�y: si'.W 3,.lE+aa..L.• �Yw r� %��r.il�i r��L e y"`-r Ir r `i ^TP �� . t•- sn , ` 7*zt 1 + -„,,.7.,,.^'. "^"' ...c.Mt•'X��.m/`�a 'J.7.ct in.-.s.�.d >' `� trY i rt • �s.H:v�Y" :-,, n‘ 1 6O1 1= being retelved In lull payment thereby, • _ $a ' ?Omen Our'hand a and nil thla .3 ". dey of A2:11...., A. O, 100 al.. ..V11�.'ln.f l ...C•.).1.Jl,a'.IQ r •.'. ti; Wllnesse•: .(.., , `- .r ' , ! e • ._. . •...• ._ .. a caz I '' e)t --..fl'rinrk.n M,. �nan• <, Zu ° it .r...., , __390(3 t.s) r` I ,. ,(t i1. �� r 1 . ,SEAL) , k9/ 3QO - • II,I( ,;'U INUt '3r1V 1 ��' I,.IIIV r „ I)j n V n lI o Correct: e r ( Appen ,' - '0 II -71. (./` • 5' i / er i Approved,: I! Y, .,,. y ller \ ,.. bl„ror, r. • .= !�V S 63•oo RECEIVFn OF THE MOUNTAIN STATES TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH CO. • E� Si 1,71 ;at) e;CInRJ L Dollars, in iva sldw.lion nl .._ ..7,C .i;C ...timidly prang twin aabl Comp g,l r,y, he n E slamtors and■sslpns,Iho right.prlrilego and authority to cunatruth operate and mahnaln Ila limn sal Telephone and TMew anti,in,het. E..,i- e a t Ing the neca Cory underground conduit,polo., Laid".wlrra nod fa'Urn upon, over nod ncruss the Drnperly Which y.a ' 7 oen,or in which . ...0 .. o" ,..... ...hive any Interest, In the l.11pt_f`lllr .—t * Ll ' :!1 d. ;.;;I1::.Y OF t. ;i lCr:(IC t;.t, � • lying aalth or Canal to :act t r,. �lztaoa 1G I • 1 ' �( ), lrnd .t.:c oat.. t:a�. n.., t: u ;: lrti,- Q\ Zoa. tor. • vctlon Ilyenty-ot`c (L1 ) .n11 In u'r1�Ll( 1 I _.:;r:i: 'Y RaaEo Si ,•o-01Eht (!57 i 1,ua l uC s , ' 'rero e i 1 — t..o :.Lz tl: t C.t::l Prl:u.,,c1. ..ur,. . ,. - • 23 s, Lz ' ...... rmmry of -'JtI . .. • :-, .. . __w and $laic of r °. t•q.j... j and upon and.along the roads, slant or high aye adjoining lb, old property, with :h. right to permit the attachment of the wires a l any °that company, and the right to trim any trees gong said !Ines ao a to keep the wires cleared at lent lorty•olght incite., to curt :'' ' and let the t:n<a.eary guy and brae ogles and anchors and to attach lhersla the recce nary guy wire. il• P Pro:ldod - - .,_. _„4ba....ShA_.a0.aG....'. °1,ppq....,.RRd _.... .aEf D...........a(Q„L�r.,4,e, canntructod 03,o7e the ': { Zaat 1.1uo-,or -tbe,,aboTO.,Caacrlbol,.praper.ty - • ff ro Fr r [ • I i,a\ T 1.'t r... i.. �. .", 11 1 '.1.,_Y..,:Y'I-•I'.•,.,,,I.y:r,'....,I nlH,.l. , 1...A•:,..... 1 �.....t f' ., .. .. I......... a r • �.: 1 si {i1 iscelrs din lull payment trglor. ., N1+..L.� { {v i t—lit I i(tia a.{P.!,,2:2 'AAAd.,T area A s thin 14 �., �y ttt"`"''' •(^ ,� ° n �yx r,ty s.� y,�g �� t, D 1 LL � opt �olo redo * +' C..I. ,-__ T/f� .nte srteli 'rt ti V • InaA<•Aee"" ' , r A • r E7 ijT' r ..ekeCyt,• r „1 + / la ['� /) �,./ .« _:.. ' x r a �r«... •S rr G./.G r [_r• r...•sl(G.)a .{r_C p ..7 s tv „' ,•'.r+: f si / (SEAL) . O i; �r i s �ls1Al '..� R,,,t ye•. r ,,: \•grata rMXI tio4 114 •1 FO tnag 1_,p; of 'I faInclrh ti,‘" �' t• • - - * - tl� t )j ' ,1I C )'.71ti a - 5� -a 5f S4 Inee ti-j I (SEA ,s. '1' i� IS' ruf pew. req� / fi.(�w r.. f ' . s; ,..„ . •,, i + _ vkl _. La ed Owvn) t t 1 -44, . .. 's-r.al{Otepslga''ll floe"_tl1C�C7'��s.7C,t.Re C CRAB Ma(f. '9) ,n 't :'1 • ,-4,},,z,cr P r ` jp ≥' ♦} ;.pis r°'+i:` s 49-!,�i _ :.,/{ ,f en Y- 4 tr.,,..-' uit''t-?e11,1,-it At ti•t \ e, 7 ASlittr . 'a.c,erL� dta' `tv f�� s` '(PTa�°.a .EIMIeTi a� ¢ ye§ ) �, < +.C,, ..t� xbsrr w �l'�Sri :iltSl �T�'W.74I•Y'tfNYn � .a` �w4.1 �' I it .-- ;S . ' ..ary iSCCl12,-'1'�''� ;laY MIt1a'BSa:3SSa�y�iQ`oR94.�"'ey' ..,r1� ea .a.Cc:a4ww.a' � 'k `§a ♦ s If- r • --- a %4..1 sr�• 'Si el i a• ♦ r6 crag + • r , _E ,r2.,,,„!‘•• ay1 • p I b >~ • r• Pe w Ml.:t- ♦a wr It •, .:-„:;;;',..',V,. r e 0 a .n .. e i• 4er.rr , • R ,]'i,t t•fk In eT . c''''''1':',"''''''' y ee• ro� s 4 rp:' ! � ° r, a �,i i rF > 4A{ a s ••b t;rK n,• i 1 .c.....:-.ilt.. {r..s,-,. • \ I t � w o e s. ♦ � w+ • "+e44 l G a eo � e Ct � e •irl�e,-"• "5-n-',•,,,,:. •,,. ,t;,-,..,•.. "'.++ta.•v r.f•it'• ,e �.;y+10, 'i d,V,...4 4,tc r•. 'pr ae , ! t ,� n :v e ,M1+r �e r M te., ;( a• r. . %•y 9 .•l,vrnte..re,..x ,-' ,•arii44a4.r'en4•d. , nes Y•' rs} '.1 a.••e . ...\. ; ,{t �• 1: ':k'J t .₹.+• .I +iJ !"..1Y� 1., e{ r�.e . ,it.l. * .- • --..r ` _ _ c - 1 ., :jEe,37.is,� ` lee ,-:.'. , ,,v e ♦ `at' / fi.°. d1 t 4 • 1 21tr !Tr YA i!'.R ('t t n 4 i3..-1.a,;•-.,-1-,.:47.,...4.9.1.2,-,-- ne-t�^S,r -I.4kse - ,_ � r • s l e �d ra-i ;I^("i 1 f t s, sl ti,,'e Y.r1 +„.k.r�.F 7+ 7 di.i4d,:cxsi ^<.! n r ...! •Sef 1 t! tl a se '1.w e.. 1 - p Jt t�G... '`: a •.[.1.-:•: > (E ..-7.i yk .•tA.:`.:L f, 4b,;''''.445-,•:".•:. fi •�N *sy"'�trt4ysd' • t• 1 e i 1 C. > A 1 t 1 t'...y 9 I 1:a. r'f •r-ri 3 'Sr. T'+S`�,.I•.sti•a :) IY ,�•t1'I %y Af•• .r.•.T �. w e m[ •,wy. r � r+. J '? i tti✓` '�I,� t ,as •tlel - •+t rAI •-K ♦ e �' 4 h r r < �u e y ! t ry e. T.f i."^ir""' ,� ♦ �t tr{�a ! -14 -c Chris a Yana` , +t Yy . 'Xrt 1 Yr X r S rwri a • 1 , y p, p •pe_ 1 r4l.."i W in�„1 r� 4 +i i fiar l I cr .5-i-i-4. t7.?•.. .ro4'1•• h.rt+.,.•, �{,w-+,:'r•4 s ,.t i..a` 11...r.+aa+Y f .:1 } Y{ii p { r M tin r S:I �� i _ - tT..•r t •.--. 3—ylrh,. .tld Cyr J a� .thc. .:4 J , f. __•-- 4 r. 'frp- nn: ..,,,,..::;,•_,..,;:-.!.., y y; 74 Sc i v Ij ^ 1 �1 �/1 �i Ch Uc -i c— I i:Jt >Y�� •i y.. • 5 ' n.rl.. 'r r,. n I ,rn N¢ -A t. r1.,r a.r.l,r....e... rT • > t u -._• ` A • 1 - '? S ° • Rrcr,vcn or THE MOUNTAIN STATES TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH CO. ` ty ' : te Z1 it. +z' t _ c°1 { r • �1.i1' •riot rut: S0/10J Spa+, 1t7r 1 3 • UelAr%In ennrlNnlbn al'Nib 1 ,. 4.„1:y vim n nln qnl Comp q,u• a .-+ ( •nnvin nd•ram..O.tlnl.p•L11• rv.ph.•ntiva. 1� I mmA rolM1mll/Ins enmlrurl.e/ 1 nA 1i•11 II r•ITI Ann.lad i,l. Pi4c i- I,*f In,In•nrmi•r/unMry.mM rnn.hll,polo%nb1„..0 n•nr1 141•„• / sal'went to 1 ens•rlr.nl<n I 1 '..,.1.::•7-2I.. V jY h ` ..r.0,h,04e4 i hn..ny Inl,rnl.Inmr;CrtLarpt [Porter :la.) of Ue :Y1:tl.•mt 1 ++ t t�s_ 0,1 A t '.(I u A't eater (�,1 lYl+c no rtr c. :c:al, rod Rn Nartl..ca quarter (:711.1 "f the '� +'Ps e r.IYJ ••? } Ethanol Qunrtar 1..1.•; of faction 9 IAtun (15).-ir..n.l.l; Troa ' 'ail,. ,r-Lv %.'",, 1 ;; .riy rr-Ii) }..1 ! I .1.1,-eI+I1 rip ..oat n JUtl..lct:,I frle:lrrl L'arillen _ i'+t s >.a • 1 .? Pr4 - r • . `. r )A i.e- H. • Cnnr/nl -4111 1411 r Q >1 N 9 1 „n rr+mA•I,q In.rn.n. .Irreh v 4,2••q.•nelnl.p the,old 1 p nr 014 14•ethl ',' m•rap mn a lI 0. IM1. ... nl • ,1.{ "� -- I. re/.rn.rrn...r.nnr.r..•I\..Ipnl r,Lrm•n/,re.•.lose ull Irma•. I t ran t • L t ":„teJ. 11 ,,,,i; [k r V �^ m.. p nry r.pa • l Ina 1 •nn r'ondcnasn me le rn•<n nb Inn IF•nnrssu pry rT .lr.— yy.,. I FILL ll.c fur IInr r all :c rcco+n all taco. alone. acid lulnlhualr an. :cl o.•rn.tl linea n., a., 'tif 4 Al - ,1 a , d .e 1.1rI /^ . tat : 1d1..+1,44 nr•In I In 101 n.r'n.nne.rrnr / • yr1• " '. WI.... 'ir, n.nn ,e..w ml. -•/•'/ n.ra i./4 ca ..- .� n txl`.1 -I Jo'n h-1-411-4'.4:1‘15 .°$4.4/ nit +n 1 -. . Sis, r Jti a ?1SCy} 4a i .. .. .Snell l ,a t e. nLI. 4.y *'t .. ........... 77 :� 1 'a _ Ratlx hill i%Li:394 - r 0" ,.a • t i {�^ K c 1 / • /J A.r • r < a `�. . a • n < a7" /��/ C`<C? /.✓ L.... . / cr � i 4� '� r I . IA; S 15').0 _ RECEIVCr or THE MOUNTAIN STATES TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH CO p j • dt .s, r _ - - _ _ _ .s. .p „I; f1 ♦ ON3 Iry:pN..DT !11'_ CO :10,/10�d•mr..In r.nddmnnn.I MA Ye. .6 nrr n1 1 If cos rI +t < t y y.n .E ;orw..ne*Wont.Ih rgnl.Ed(flop and.mn.Aryp wnu,ra.an I d I I I It,nn.,a nl.pn• 1 1•a pn.Ind+n. It, < iaa r .:The nro.s.rr d 1 and r•Mdt.pals..t,Mts..I ....dun..r n. .,, ind onon ma properll which la -_ y {+ i • 1, -n,.t ln.N,F -...L. hit iTblo.dl la.Rao .(by)..at.the 3outh..,t cu,rtar (-e'I QQ1. t o f ar Jaet Ions S1rtoon (1a) aaa the Northeast quert•r OTTO of lLa goaIns t quarter _... , r • a ! 1 (LZi) of 5lotion twenty-pod (t11,.?omsti;.1io IT)..North, ponce.t Illy-al.Lt lut L. , '',`roe } a Test at the 'J Ls lE. 16th) Prinell.cl 'tarlatan._ ._ ..._ , I - - II (: [ ri I. - [flat,J._. T.Id _. d1 1I M Col OredQ .. • a : t'• 4 ;St. _ 1 d yr..M J'i Ir• d..•t r•I Flln /•.dl t I i In mkt rot ny .,ih IA allot 11 h lF n n t 1 Ih I y t ` [i ••r IA done / Ar IM1 111111 41 r 4 ••l p 14 n 11 .1 1 1 @.N I d I I t I 1/ I1M1t n %1 t an•i• r M1 r i I. I 5.1 the nc M nr r'/ d irx.l sad.n<w.End l Ina h Owns Ih,puma."pry,A x r /d i + .Iht ; d I r l ry d�, I S r 'fit. . it w1li6Y hadxi 1rM1_TI `Me.d-dx—'i.c It +i {;r r t t 1 51 + as �s ��.Ili it �+ %eab 'Ja,�B 5.r.Iw /i�Zt'L�. M 1 't �K?Pel ?mot ,(c'olp ri f .e { 't w n tz and '' g I- IKni...4 .:fit .E t 1. :1 Ttr"f f� ir-, , ✓ f'def.. •:1 (,R tn.w•..wa..J i • '7y'} ' , •<- •., I `r.- = 111•; r (11x) '{ /r.{1411 u ' 1-11tuu .p"-Si L .r : 1J t o . I r. a >. ti 1, kK Id' r *41:11, 4 . _ v » .,•S: , p[xj • • i r t .:. '41. I.; G. It 414 a •• •• r ur t'. . .. • , `ti' t-.[O.o.l 'I ♦.- , }• t. . 2 e- t'q a i •E r.�a r•- li •f. JI- t 'h •Wd 3, -:-.444.:.- r r • . {N; adr�`i P.M A`J,ru. -- ,•yors Ill r . 7�ave..t.2 fA •...I;:�f%�1 3vi`+, R1-F>4< t i•TCrr. al+`a •. . a k C •t"rtl F�r�t'.F7+5.t .'F S „e A.v;17-1-` 1ieiir-T-P- 41_4'S' a s t:54•E F 1♦'� 7 a V. a®vr�iss +s.�r¢xasttileu r low t .e1pYt'�1i t I 1.. •p acv ,+,“145454.140.1.1.4rd 1044,•••V.1, l 2i act. • t..Aiiti •z +; `•r l ' 't n14 4 :-.:,. 1! ?f '% J •V t♦ ,, W w ,?s.: .y Yap![ rat1 .rho .• .. r',^ 1 ptit ..A 1• ; ;xf -.1' ro - ... . +• '� t nair`tW,..XT' . v'k.. ..m.''';!::.$!'n�2 .d F•.•a. Book.954. Rutty I ION.1876.97 DATE_ R$7_ �ulir (Minh,T1ME � COIARAII) MARY ANN-FTVERSTEIN Clerl Rrrorder Weld h, fnlneev> ' • /o Right-of-Way Grant K\0s Al.1. MIEN H\ rlt_sr. PRESENTS. that Ky-Ry Farms; Margret L. Salberg, Kathryn L. Hobbs. Martha J. Warless Benson f% Longmont Colorado of the Post Office of in the State of_ • hereinafter rotor-red to a. "Grant„r-' 'whether one or morel. in consideration of One Dollar(31.00). to tfieni herd __:a -r._hI,h c is each, aykaowledp_d,sad t ie Funher coneaei. ion, .1 r ri g_ per linear red, to be paid before the 1418( pipe line hereinafter specified in laid_d0 • hereby grant and convey unto PINIIINDLE:E:k511atN PIPE LINE COMPANY. a Delaware Corporation, having on office in Kansas City. Missouri. its successors and assigns. hereinafter referred to as "Grantee.- a Right-of-May to la,, construct. maintain, lower.inspect.repair,replace.relocate,change the size of,operate.and remove a pipe line • XADTAIKpLX1441JU(i11XJOCCalWO alts I(KalatXtat drip..pipe line markers,valves.launchers.receivers,cathodic equipment. teat leads, and all appurtenances convenient for the maintenance and operation of said lined(.nd for the transportation of oil. gas. or other substances therein,under.on.over and through the premise.hereafter described. o and the Grantee is granted the right of ingress and egresot to,on.from and over the following described premises for o the purposes aforementioned in the County of We id _ in the State of Colorado,to-wit: 0 The Northwest Quarter less 3 acres more or less of Section 21, Township 3 North, Range 68 West of the 6th P.M. M C TO HAVE AND TO 1101A said eaeemeers.rights.and right-of-way unto the acid PANIIANDI,E EASTERN PIPE LINE COMPA.Nl', its successors and assigns. XINKUX XXLIALIANICIXPeX)000 IDYAKXYYXYKI(XXiteXIYYYYYYYYYYXYYYPECKaharti X1(I istE KY)(YKKDGXY KYa XY.XXXDIYd001XKYY. Grantee to have the right to select and change the route Xaxar(Pipe liner herein authorized to he laid under, upon dyer an/b .art the Arne described premise•. All pipe inatalird hereunder shall be buried a mini- Titmum of Xe4XIXXIW in,n t�an or:null not construe' or plat anything over or no close to any pipe line or other facility of Grantee as will he likely to interfere with Grantee's surveillance of or acess thereto by use of equipment or means customarily employed in the sue,cillnnrr or inr aintrnan cr of pipe IincZ nor intentionally cause the original cover over nay pipeline to be reduced Leroy. wholievernis the greater of n minimum cover of Iwo(2)feet nr below the mini- mum cover required rata v time Iry ant npplionble pipe line anGtr rode. All damage to growing crops.drainage tile ,s rind fence. of Grantor nsi ned b. the ,n n•truttion ,r repair of any of the facilities herein authorized to be main- tained and ',permed he Grantee shall !,r 'mid by Grantee after the damage is d„ne.,aid damage, if not mutually agreed upon, to be ascertained and determined bo three disinterested persons,one to Inc appointed by the Grantor, one to be appointed by the Grantee. anti the third in be ho.en by thr two sn sppninted.The written award of such three persons shall be final and ronclusive. Payment of all moneys becoming due hereunder may he pail to KY-KY Parma.Archer G. Salbere. at Longmont, Colorado. 80501 This Grant shall be binding upon the heirs. executors, administrators, successor., and assigns of the parties hereto, aaatl rights herein granted, or any of them separately. may be released or assigned in whole or in part. It is understood that this Grant cannot be changed in any way except in writing,signed by the Cantor and a duly authorized agent of the Grantee. W. L. Robertson • This instrument prepared by P.O. Bon 1348,Kansas City, t Missouri 64141. PANHANDLE EASTERN PIPE LINE COMPANY, also having a legal address of P. 0. Box 127, Brighton, Colorado 80601. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Grantors have hereunto.et their hands and seals this day of November , A.O., t9 81 Ky-RY Farms' ` 44tt 4 tCfr<l{/4.(/ Ma rgre L. Salberg 47/45-44C7-. ->c,eto x gamst • Kathryn Dobbs, Martha J. HarlErss Benson BOOK_95 RECEPTION 18'76091' -- a.-a • ACKNOWLEDGMENT FOR HUSBAND AND WIFE _ s'I'.ATE OF col ARADO 1 ss. I COUNTY OF 1 . The foregoing inelrnmeol wee acknowledged before me this ,day of — by std - - ' • L..1•-.A ..A ..;r. •ou•. •vu¢ My Commission aspires: ACKNOWLEDGMENT FOR INDIVIDUAL STATE OF COLORADO 1 1 as. COUNTY OF Boulder 1 The fore i euvment was acknowledged before me this 17th.day of_ November 19 B1 , going ,a by MareariS,L. Salhere Kethtya T . He',b% and Ky-Ry Farm], By: Arthur C. Solberg, Agent. mss ., r. ''Ll f'.L1G 40L Main Street. Longmont, CO 83501. . My'.oesmIssionnplees: —_`larch 5, 1992 gr.Ce k, (IdWldA i) "1 ®AwTRUST INSURANCE STATE OP CALIFORNIA tiro—y'w r� S5. COUNTY OP S.dN_f!iC9-�----} On____lr€!!bCt__O., /'r/_._before me,the andenlaned.a Notary Public In sad for NM State.personallym otallr appeared Ni�A ^ -Y. N.M7ass_134se"�i zmil ,known lo me ' 2 to be due Pr wbeae tunic •o ✓ob,arbed E to the*NAln inselllenettl std.ckaowledaed that_ .c onPtaAL SEAL 1 eeaeu,ed the same Wait BYRON STRAUSBAUGH WtTNES5 my hand sod Macial teal. '4t 9 NOTARY FMK CALIFORNIA KINCIPAL Of NC{IN � � SAN 0400 COUNT' /{n (7 L My CraltMc WANE oaVWaw 71,I Siatstorc ≥A"t'c C) Atv-,5114, g — Mil inn Ne aa4tl s—i isdl H n N X r i a. wr. .c o 6 r0 M 1 w v sI c 0 u s w E J t �! a ;11:;:<; Z I .F I e e Si G b • P C O O CY a WR: au aCmI W UST.O G Z• S Z Q aO Z W O o 1 .x ...• K O` t al z C Y 6t1 an N U aE _ +` 'Y 9� • A81919365 Ir 0986 REC 01914355 01/14/03 11 :09 F 1355 MARY ANN FEIIERSTEIN CLERK & RECORDER WELD CO,1/003 CO• GRANT OF EASEMENT MARTHA J. HARLES5, MARGARET L. SALBERG and KATHRYN L. HOBBS of 1309 Carolina Avenue, Longmont, Boulder County, Colorado, Owners of the following described property in Weld County, Colorado, to-wit: NW 1/4 of Section 21, Township 3 North, Ranoe-68 Rent of the 6th P.M.; excepting that portion heretofore conveyed by Deed of record to The Northern Construction Company; in consideration of $10.00.and other valuable consideration, receipt of which is acknowledged, hereby grant, bargain, sell and convey to KITELEy FARMS, A GENERAL PARTNERSHIP, of 13844 Weld County Road 7, • Weld County, Colorado, Grantees, the following easement to-wit: An easement located in the NW 1/4 of Section 21, Township 3 North, Range 68 West of-the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado, said easement being 20 feet in width, ten feet on each side of the following described centerline: Beginning at a point on the North line of Section 21, whence the NW corner of said Section 21 bears South 89°32'37'West 496.41 feet} thence South 27°38'48" East, 2,985.60 feet to the-point of termination located on the South line of the NW 1/4 of said Section 21, whence the West one-quarter corner of said Section 21 bears South 89'29'25' p, West 1902.85 feet.This , opeation an maintenancea t of an agricultural is for e cirrigation nwaterrpipeline dfor the benefit of and appurtenant to the following described real property owned by the Grantees: The SW 1/4 of Section 21, Township 3 North, Range 68 West of the 6th P.M., weld County, Colorado. The Grantees promise to construct this pipeline at sufficient depth to insure that theOwners' farming operations or any other use of th it pr -ty will not-damage cPc enrage'it nor be interfered with t.,, it,. •.:a to operate and maintain this pipeline in good condition, to make 'necessary repairs .thereon within a -reasonable length of tine after • notice, to Use It solely for agricultural irrigation purposes, and to pay for all drop and/or;Other actual damages caused by'auch ' construction, opcia-Elonnd m;alntenance. 'The Grantees agree that the above described easement replaces and eliminates the existing open ditch, which runs to the east of and rcoghly parallel cothe above described easement, and which, heretofore, the Grantees used for the delivery of their irrigation water. Grantees agree that the owners may fill In this existing open ditch, and they hereby abandon any and all rights that they may have B 0986 REC 01914355 01/14/83 11 09 $9.00 2/003 ) .' F 1356 MARY ANN FEUERSTEIN CLERK & RECORDER WELD CO, CO had therein. This agreement shall extend to and be binding upon the heirs /t,It, legal representatives and assigns of the parties. °5tE u�m!J4{".a,� ra o lc ry c_• • k Executed this v{/ day of 4•2„t-r.- , 19J'?.- , I,.,4. ,'I,:'-> . e II ® �ts San �'""' ,11 VWWWW W+nvs vAN :I OFHNn.,,l flAt 5EAl NOTARY ACKNOWLEDGEMENT MARTHA S Core { lj INDIVIDUAL _„ 7, , f.0lMr IVaIC MA:IrVOA { 15- fJy. rrisrirm m 5.4.11 Oa G0Cu0T STATE CI CALIFORNIA r',an ov II Lo I/v El DEA I (0UNIY rn __'s��_ __��fr�_� _ 155 '.\NLWhY:.V.":,ry/.,y�'LY il On this oat_day ol.l_«?NfsFC_,in the year r'1 before nip,the under,gned a Notary Public in and fur said i• County and State,personally appeared _. _i'V'14 ✓ N?_er-aCeff __ _ _ _ - __ „ —— — -- — - - personally known to me for proved to me on the basis of satisfactory es,- I I donee)to be the persen(sli•ihnse nanre(s115/areSeh',Lr,bed to this instrument and acknowfedye that _- _ _ _ Ii - - -_ - _. __executed it ,----.7 t. , //may/y'7� �J a1 M'S 451/,9'4 ll • • • • • • e. 'lc •E II I' • H 0Y86 RFC 01914355 01/14/83 1 F 135/ MARY ANN FEUEf.•SiE IN CLERY,1 .09 tY• ti 3/003 .l RECORDER WELD C CO K!TELE? PARKS • a general partnership -„4„._2.1)O„�Ha Kart ar Har es I/ � lr'-'�dikPartn a G Narga t L. SalberL GRANTEE fj r/� Ka r f-a-/ Yn Hobbs State of Colorado OWNERS ) s6, • .{iCS' t of ) 4...,, ,,,,._ .,L,_<, cribe d and 198,..2_svdrn to before me this -s ' ., OZrR by �ir-2�� t�1 .day of \�';U1+ cdemi as ionmy nexpiregfflci^-E`o•c/Sl/ /G /•!�� Notary Pub- / ri Address: f/p/ 7Rx.�_..i State of Colorado ) cm4."4��nz, t*�,pnSa7 County of ) ss. 6i•' !bed nd,�rn t fore.me this .,?d-4- day of _ . 4 My hand and Official teal, <Je4_!� t Pii salon expires: %JiL,.LJS/v{L t \SAN 74? t- ' J y" G� Notary Publ COLORADO Address: / ,.94_..e..;,-,--/ State 6f t) ot;yyy,-cr.�-",e te7So/ County of Boulder ) LG. /- - _ Subscribed and sworn to before me this 13th day January Jain_ �, 198 3 by ERNEST N. KITEL.EY-- of 7/11 F.+1 to^in m'• :.i d and fly commission ex s: J ins seal. .;4w»y.4...?;, pi res: July 24, 1984 ACTAR ' ' : 44::•,-`.". AddreNotarss Public NU 0 i 401 Main Street 9L\. ya, • . f.:•e.'it e. 80501 EASEMENT DEED This Easement Deed Is made this eiH day of 9(i998.by and between Martha J. Berson- as Trustee of the MARTHA J. BENSON TRUST,whose address is%Richard L Salberg, 435 Karsh Drive.Longmont. Colorado,80501.5217('GRANTOR').and the Northern Colorado Water Conservancy District,acting by and through the Southern Water Supply Project Water Activity Enterprise,a govemment-owned business within the meaning of Article X Section 20(21(d),of the Colorado Constitution.organized pursuant to C.R.S.§§37-45.1-101 et sea. whose address Is 1250 North Wilson Avenue. Loveland.Colorado 80537('GRANTEE-). GRANTOR,for an in consideration of the sum of FIVE THOUSAND FIFTY SIX AND 25/100 DOLLARS paid by the GRANTEE to the GRANTOR the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged,has granted,bargained,sold and conveyed,and by this Easement Deed does grant.bargain,sell,convey and confirm to the GRANTEE-Its successors and assigns forever, a permanent non-exclusive easement on and under the property described on Exhibit A attached Q hereto and incorporated herein by this reference,located in Weld County, Colorado('Property); for the purpose of: 1. Surveying,locating,Installing,constructing,using,operating.maintaining, inspecting, repairing,altering,removing and replacing one or more burled water Pipelines.In whole or in part,and all nernsary subsurface and surface appurtenances for the transportatloo of water and the operation and control of water pipelines: 2. Marking the location of the Properly and pipeline or pipelines thereunder by suitable markers set and maintained In the ground at locations which shall not interfere with such reasonable use as GRANTOR shall make of the Property under the terms of thus Easement Deed; 3. Cutting and clearing trees.brush.debuts,and other obstructions on the Property that might interfere with the operation and maintenance of GRANTEE's activities and facilities on the Property;and The GRANTEE,ITS SUCCESSORS&ASSIGNS shall; 5. Insofar as practicable bury all pipe and communication and control cables to a sufficient depth at the time of construcuon so as not to Interfere unreasonably with the ordinary cultivation of the Property; 6. Insofar as practicable,restore the surface of the ground to Its condition prior to installation,construction,maintenance,alteration.or replacement of the pipeline or pipelines and appurtenances thereto: 7. Insofar as practicable,repair or replace all existing improvements on the Property. at no cost to the GRANTOR including but not limited to fences,drain tile.water lines,Irrigation systems,ditches,landscaping.private roads and other Improvements to the conditions existing prior to GRANTEE'S aHlvtues on the Property should those improvements be damaged or disturbed by GRANTEE,or at Wd-+a Awmiut Wawntr pm, 2482998 8-1539 P-755 03/28/96 03:17P PG 1 OP 8 Weld County CO Clerk & Recorder 1, 4 I>0C 41,00 IUlI llllill iIl ._ 1 IT;�Itii�►1�!II�T • GRANTEE'S option pay the actual cost to repair or replace such items caused by GRANTEE'S activities on the Property; 8. Pay the GRANTOR for any crop damage and damage to livestock and other items caused by GRANTEE'S activities on the Property. Including but not limited to crop damage caused by interference with Irrigation and loss of irrigation water caused by GRANTEE'S activities on the Property,and 9. Restore or replace improvements made by the GRANTOR on the Property that were made with the written consent of the GRANTEE as provided in paragraph 14 below, should these improvements be disturbed by the GRANTEE,on the condition that the GRANTOR pays one-half of the costs for such restoration or replacement. The GRANTOR reserved the right to use and occupy the Property for any lawful purpose consistent with the rights and privileges granted herein including the right to grant easements and rights-of-way upon, over, and across so long as such uses-easements, and rights-of-way do not interfere with or endanger the Property or any of the GRANTEES facilities on or under the Property or GRANTEE'S use thereof.provided that GRANTOR shall not 10. Construct or allow the construction of any buildings or other structures on or under the Property; 11. Impound water or other substance on or over the Property, except as may be rim-vs- ory for the normal irrigation practices of GRANTOR; 12. Stare or dtspose of any dangerous,toxic or hazardous substance on or under the Property,except pursuant to normal fanning practices; 13. Alter or replace any fence on the Property without the prior written consent of GRANTEE. This provision shall not apply to normal repair, maintenance, or replacement of any existing fence with similar materials: 14. Use the Property for any purpose except agriculture without the prior written consent of GRANTEE; provided,however,the written consent of the GRANTEE will not be unreasonably withheld for the following uses: a. Wen space areas with or without landscaping but excluding fences. other than along property lines,retaining walls,and trees; b. Paved,gravel-surfaced, or unsurfaced local sidewalks,driveways, or roadways; C Paved,gravel-surfaced.or unsurfaced parking areas except uses involving long-term storage: d. Paved,gravel-surfaced,or unsurfaced recreation areas(excluding buildings'such as trails.bike paths,basketball courts, tennis courts, volleyball courts: and e. Temporary covers or enclosures not requiring the construction or a foundation and not to be used for long-term storage. f Utility lines crossing at right angles. 2482998 B-1539 P-755 113/28/96 03:17P PG 2 OF 8 f lib'�IILli II 111 1 IR�IA I{V I ID®1 I 15. Plant or allow any trees to grow on the Property without the prior written consent of GRANTEE. The corral,drain tiles,pipes,and other drainage apparatus presently located on the Property shall be allowed to remain in their current location. GRANTOR may maintain and repair such Items and may replace them with similar Items. Except In the case of an emergency. In the event that GRANTOR must engage in ground disturbing activities to maintain.repair, or replace such Items on the Property.GRANTOR shall give the GRANTEE reasonable advance notice prior to such maintenance,repair. or replacement. In the event of an emergency. GRANTOR shall attempt to give GRANTEE notice of ground disturbing activities by telephone. GRANTOR shall not interfere with or damage the GRANTEE'S pipeline in performing such maintenance,repair, or replacement. GRANTEE'S obligations hereunder shall be enforceable against the GRANTEE. Its successors,and assigns by GRANTOR, her heirs, successors, and assigns. GRANTOR_ MAR'yTH-A J.BENSON TRUST By:Martha J.B on Title:Trustee of the MARTHA J.BENSON'TRUST STATE OFGALIFo2.R1ti 1 COUNTY OF`'RR p/Ce-V j ss. The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of (`1(Mc tf . 1996, by Martha J.Benson,Trustee,of MARTHA J. BENSON TRUST, GRANTOR My commission expires 'TAM .I . 19,47 ... Witness my hand and official seal. Notary Public t, SEE ATfAcrtre7 CALIrck lel ac4NOL{{JCE-pLrTtric 2482998 B-1539 P-755 03/28/96 03:17P PG 3 OF 8 Lnd-rf\i__ dbt,_.na.we 3 Illl�l�lllatl{ NT-- 7 hiP MIME 1— CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT . State of California County of San Diego i On MflRCM "fie(916 before me, Paul V Mr Nutt Net pry 0uh 1 it en and M el elks FO..%In en.Notary ruble) personally appeared m a k-rtt-A 5Y. f FA 50 N M anti)a59^•14)etrl O personally blown tome—OR—/1 proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the persontsl whose name(s)is/arp subscribed to the within instrument 1 and acknowledged to me that fie/she/they executed the I I same in his/herfrrejr authorized capacity(ec)r,and that by11. I ,rrnek, PAUL V.McNUTF his/her/their signalurels)on the Instrument the person(s), U U NOTARY ue i19830e6 m or the entity upon behalf of which the person(`t)acted, cv CALIFORNIA O ill t y executed the kI5INR)enl. 4 era SAN GEGO COUNTY ro My Scorn.bores.inn.a I.tee? I WITNESS my hand and official seal. 1' 1 &Wrr ryMl OPTIONAL Thatch the information below a nor requited by law,k may prows npMet for i aneo eq d 0m tie document and ttrAY p'ewra keudMnf remove!and nntedmenf el to rpm to another OcganM. Description of Attached Document Title or Type of Document: PA-5F_MEN T- P1.tr7 Document Date: !14kc-t{ Q 1`Th Number of Pages:,_ Signer(s)Other Than Named Above:_ • Capacity(ies) Claimed by Slgner(s) • Signets Name: Signer's Name: ❑ Individual \ ❑ Corporate Officer 0 Individual Title(s): 0 Corporate Officer ❑ Partner rwr—❑Limited ❑General Partann(Titie( ): _ 1 ❑ Attorney-in-Fact or—❑Umited ❑General ,�1t O Trustee 0 Aaomey-in-Fad 1 O Guardian or Conservator , aRg ,,, 0 Guardian 0 1 an or Conservator s❑ Other. loo al rant hafts 0 Other: N roe drummer. 1 L •Signer Is Representing: 1 Signer Is Representing: N k. 2482998 B-1539 P-755 03/28/96 03:17P PG 4 OF 8 Ada.,CSToi-i..,co,;n«.n III lain lItII.i ii. l — __1 Il;JlillillltIfid LEGAL DESCRIPTION FILE NO, 1001487 'EXHIBIT A' PERMANENT EASEMENT AN UNDIVIDED 46.875% INTEREST IN THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PROPERTY: PARCEL 11 A PORTION OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 16, AND THE NORTH HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 21. BOTH IN TOWNSHIP I NORTH, RANGE 68 WEST OF THE 6T1I PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, WELD COUNTY, COLORADO, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS; COMMENCING AT THE SOUTH QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 16; THENCE NO1 DEGREE 12 MINUTES 44 SECONDS W ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 16 A DISTANCE OF 15.00 FEET TO •TIIE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE 589 DECREES 02 MINUTES 41 SECONDS W ALONG A LINE REIN: 15.00 FEET NORTHERLY OF AND PARALLEL WITH THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF THE 0001'IIWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 16 A DISTANCE OF 817.76 FEET; THENCE S00 DECREES 46 MINUTES 10 SECONDS E A DISTANCE OF 121.48 FEET; THENCE SO8 DECREES 57 MINUTES 52 SECONDS W A DISTANCE OF 1822.24 FEET: THENCE NO0 DECREES 18 MINUTES 28 SECONDS W ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 21 A DISTANCE OF 50.00 FRET; THENCE NOB DECREES 57 MINUTES 52 SECONDS E A DISTANCE OF 1771.84 FEET; THENCE NOO DEGREES 46 MINUTES 10 SECONDS W A DISTANCE OF 121.55 FEET; THENCE H89 DEGREES 02 MINUTES 41 SECONDS E ALONG A LINE BEING 65.00 FEET NORTHERLY OF AND PARALLEL WITH TOE SOUTHERLY LINE OF 911E SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 16 A DISTANCE OF 867.37 FEET: THENCE 501 DEGREE 12 MINUTES 44 SECONDS C ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF TIIE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 16 A DISTANCE OF 50.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, COUNTY OF WELD, STATE OF COLORADO. MARLA M. MCOMDER PI,S 24961 MERIIICK L COMPANY P.O. BOX 22026 DENVER, CO 80014 NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON CREATING NEWLY CREATED LEGAL DESCRIPTION 178-J5-106.5 C.R.5.) 2482998 B-1539 P-755 03/28/96 03:17P PG 5 OP 8 Lliiltllli i ;: l I I I --. U VIII IEIII II illll _.. :a`........ h A portion of S1/2E1/2SW1/4 Section 16 lc N1/2NW1/4 Section 2l i Township 3 North, Range 68 West, 6thP.µ. • • Weld 2ounty, Colorado Oil/I m. M Olli es''”CC. ,,,kLca N I.n tht S[Intl' ((gime SI/ • SN I CO' t.n..It.c{ M/I b 10111.4Y ✓ in/4i hc:i 'SW XVI ii helm K PC9 I FV..1 -I.meac.r . 'kw* t.a mnl A • I I Iammal t.wnW II L 61 oes "Les.KR) co -1°. 'I : oo s! I I. 1 I. I I.•Nr faun an YUN.M y Fr, I , re.:m 1s-v7kxl: Ki F-' i ....err tewatA Y- II v') 1141 tan , III IS...IM0. E C.;) 0.132 Kt) I, to..p' 4,,,o o W. IIT._I`o'; ' ' b11 0•'I Is - nl.q tevn.d 1 T St R • IeIw ou >j1 F to ---1 . 51.0‘NM) el ulk nrp N'Ieet_, 0 I..r:. 7qi - --. ' t..o..r N u m het Ir. es. n Ie......:S WI n N....O.N....O.4”,tN• )k.IL: P I. I. V . .x h L . to ic-I II t P.1E6 iaMe1PUS5 Nas II cm, QI ' I •. o _.• was KR) -�! KK 01Ili, s^ •3 4Ita..r fn. ' •l..,hjl OF M/(Mx _---1,l -_ - _ - I ' Social l r. n . �...*., ter n rte s my r om 'tI' Pc usi.x.L I IWS �siRlr-- . t..n..C • Loss Casa So&•OAS so anilC SCJil Iasi: I-$J-q%.cl:•x IS t•'Pri(—.4 So I.UaI es I .. I..w:s_N-li o..`M+... 1S.p r 1ae..I A. C•1.147 a �! [.•A '.w ta.L•tY I n'n4 tne....l Ma•INS acres 1610,1 PREPARED IY KRRICIX S CVIS'ANY • • AD NO tR-at. MARTHA J. BENSON, etal. N.C.W.C.D. Block and Veatch SC141 I{1 T ,1Ow51M )SCAN i00 11 ICI SfN11'•1tp' • ru.up PEN - HUDSONIlr. noon norm( Yin eosin cowed* --ft. ' t5%l.Qll ma taw' Ml.I.}I.II PARS/VRt( eta- K..n1M.Is ey I ! I !1 MIllllIIIE I Commitment Number, 1001487 • The policy or policies to be issued will contain exceptions to the following unless the same are disposed of to the satisfaction of the Company: 1. Rights or claims of parties in possession not shown by the public records. 2. Easements or claims of easements not shown by the public records. 3. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortages in area, encroachments, and any facts which a correct survey and inspection of the premises would disclose and which are not shown by the public records. 4. Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor, or material heretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law and not shown by the public records. 5. Defects, liens, encumbrAnces, adverse claims or other matters, if any, created, first appearing in the records or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to the date the proposed insured acquired of record for value the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. 6: .Taxes or special assessments which are not shown as existing liens by the public records. 7. ALL TAXES AND ASSESSMENTS, NOW OR -HERETOFORE ASSESSED, DUE OR PAYABLE. 8. EASEENT AND RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH LINES AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES GRANTED TO THE MOUNTAIN STATES TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH CO. AS SET FORTH IN INSTRUMENT RECORDED MAY 7, 1930, IN BOOK 194 AT PAGE 390, UPON THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREIN SET FORTH. 9. RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR PIPELINES AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES, UPON THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREIN SET FORTH AS GRANTED To PANHANDLE EASTERN PIPE LINE COMPANY BY INSTRUMENT RECORDED DECfl BER 3, 1981, IN BOOK 954 AT RECEPTION NO. 1876097. NOTICE OF GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF AREA SERVED WAS RECORDED JUNE 26, 1986, IN BOOK 1117 AT RECEPTION NO. 2058722. SAID INTEREST HAS BEEN CONVEYED TO KN FRONT RANCE GATHERING COMPANY, A COLORADO CORPORATION, EY INSTRUMENT RECORDED APRIL 5, 1993, IN BOOK 1376 AT RECEPTION NO. 2327621 AND HAS BEEN ENCUMBERED BY A MORTGAGE GRANTED TO NATIONSBANC LEASING CORPORATION, A NORTH CAROLINA CORPORATION, RECORDED APRIL 7, 1993, IN BOOK 1377 AT RECEPTION NO. 2327864. 10. AN EASfHFNT FOR AN IRRIGATION WATER PIPELINE AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES GRANTED TO KITELEY FARMS, A GENERAL PARTNERSHIP, AS SET FORTH AND DESCRIBED IN INSTRUMENT RECORDED JANUARY 14, 1983, IN ROOK 996 AT RECEPTION NO. 1914355, UPON THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREIN SET FORTH. 11. EASEMENT AND RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR GAS PIPELINES TO PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO, A COLORADO CORPORATION, AS EVIDENCED BY PLAT RECORDED OCTOBER 28, 1994, IN BOOK 1465 AT RECEPTION NO. 2412934. 12. NOTICE PURSUANT TO 9-1.5-103, C.R.S., CONCERNING UNDERGROUND FACILITIES OF UNITED POWER, INC.. RECORDED JANUARY 24, 1991, IN BOOK 1288 AT RECEPTION NO. 2239296. 13. EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS-OF-WAY FOR WATER LINES OWNED BY LITTLE THOMPS0N VALLEY HATER DISTRICT AND OVERHEAD ELECTRIC PRESUMED TO BELONG TO UNITED POWER, INC., • • 2482998 B-1539 P-755 03/28/96 03:17P PG 7 OF 8 1r111111tin 11 ,1 ;71 11-flllllllitf;f I AS SHOWN ON SURVEY ENTITLED MARTHA J. BENSON, ET AL., JOB NO. 272-1184, DAT} FEBRUARY 28, 1995, PREPARED BY HERRICK i COMPANY. 11. EASEMENT AND RIGHT-OF-NAY FOR WELD COUNTY ROAD 5 AND WELD COUNTY ROAD 32. 2482998 B-1539 P-755 03/28/96 03:17P PG 8 OF 8 } IIICIG®III !III ill It 1 • • EASEMENT DEED This Easement Deed is made this BYKlay of MARC.H1996.by and between Richard L. Solberg.Charles IL Hobbs. Bruce L Hobbs, Barbara K. Bucklew,Judith A. Henry, and Michael W.Hobbs.whose address Is c/o Richard L. Solberg,435 Harsh Drive,Longmont.Colorado, 80501.5217 CGRAMTOR'l,and the Northern Colorado Water Conservancy District, acting by and through the Southern Water Supply Project Water Activity Enterprise,a government-owned bustness within the meaning of Article X.Section 20(21(dl.of the Colorado Constitution, organized pursuant to C.R.S.g§37.45.1-101 tt ems,whose address Is 1250 North Wilson Avenue,Loveland.Colorado 80537('GRANTEE"). GRANi'OR for an in conslderauon of the sum of FIVE THOUSAND SEVEN HUNDRED FORTY THREE c1-O DOLLARS paid by the GRANTEE to the GRANTOR the recMairilltaffidcncy of which Is-hereBy acknowledged.has granted,bargained, sold and conveyed,and by this Easement Deed does grant,bargain,sell,convey and confirm to the GRANTEE,its successors and assigns forever, a permanent non-exclusive easement on and under the property described on Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference,located in Weld County,Colorado('Property"): for the purpose of: 1. Surveying. locating,Installing,constructing,using.operating.maintaining. Inspecting,repairing,altering removing and replacing one or more buried water pipelines,in whole or in part,and all necessary subsurface and surface appurtenances for for the transportation of water and the operation and control of water pipelines: 2- Marling the location of the Property and pipeline or pipelies suitable markers set and maintained in the ground at loca thereunder tions which shall not interfere with such reasonable use as GRANTOR shall make of the Property under the terms of this Easement Deed; 3. Cutting and clearing trees. brush, debris, and other obstrucuons on the Property that might interfere with the operation and maintenance of GRANTEE'S activities and facilities on the Property:and The GRANTEE,TES SUCCESSORS&ASSIGNS shall: 5. Insofar as practicable,bury all pipe and communication and control cables to a sufficient depth at the time of construction so as not to interfere unreasonably with the ordinary cultivation of the Property: 6. Insofar as pracncablc restore the surface of the ground to its condition prior to installation.construction.maintenance. alteration,or replacement of the pipeline or pipelines and appurtenances thereto: 7. Insofar as practicable. repair or replace all existing Improvements on the Property. at no cost to the GRANTOR including but not limited to fences.drain tile,water lines. irrigation systems.ditches,landscaping private roads and other Improvements to the conditions tasting prior to GRANTEES activities on the Property should those improvements be damaged or disturbed by GRANTEE, or at lend'�ati�va W eAeb..y.e, 2484148 B-1540 P-764 04/04/96 02:45P PG 1 OF 8 Weld County CO Clerk & Recorder 41.REC IXIC 41.00 - - _ t 1gflj*IUL I- • • GRANTEE'S option pay the actual cost to repair or replace such Items caused by GRANTEE'S activities on the Property: 8. Pay the GRANTOR for any crop damage and damage to livestock and other Items caused by GRANTEE'S activities on the Property, Including but not limited to crop damage caused by interference with irrigation and loss of irrigation water caused by GRANTEE'S activities on the Property:and 9. Restore or replace improvements made by the GRANTOR on the Property that were made with the written consent of the GRANTEE as provided In paragraph 14 below, should these improvements be disturbed by the GRANTEE,on the condition that the GRANTOR pays one-half of the costs for such restoration or replacement The GRANTOR reserves the right to use and occupy the Property for any lawful purpose consistent with the rights and privileges granted herein including the sight to grant casements and rights-of-way upon.over,and across so long as such uses, easements, and rights-of-way do not interfere with or endanger the Property or any of the GRANTEE'S facilities on or under the Property or GRANTEE'S use thereof,provided that GRANTOR shall not: 10. Construct or allow the construction of any buildings Cr other structures on or under the Property. 11. Impound water or other substance on or over the Property,except as may be necessary for the normal irrigation practices of GRANTOR; 12. Store or dispose of any dangerous,toxic or hazardous substance on or under the Property, except pursuant to normal farming practices: 13. Alter or replace any fence on the Property without the prior written consent of GRANTEE. This provision shall not apply to normal repair,maintenance,or replacement of any existing fence with similar materials: 14 Use the Property for any purpose except agiiculture without the prior written consent of GRANTEE; provided,however,the written consent of the GRANTEE will not be unreasonably withheld for the following uses: { a- Open space areas with or without landscaping but excluding fences, other than along property lines.retaining walls,and trees: b- Paved.gravel-surfaced,or unsurfaced local sidewalks, driveways, or roadways: c. Paved.gravel-surfaced,or unsurfaced parting areas except uses tnvolving long-term storage: d. Paved,gravel-surfaced.or unsurfaced recreation areas(excluding buildings,such as trails,bike paths,basketball courts, tennis courts. volleyball courts: and t Temporary coves or enclosures not requiring the construction of a foundation and not to be used for long-term storage. Utility lines crossing at right angles. 2484148 B-1540 P-764 04/04/96 02:45P PG 2 OF 8 i1#mzuuhini tl17 : I1.IIi'I119I1,®I • 15. Plant or allow any trees to grow on the Property without the prior written consent of GRANTEE. The corral, drain Wes.pipes,and other drainage apparatus presently located on the Property shall be allowed to remain in their current location. GRANTOR may maintain and repair such Items and may replace them with similar items. Except in the case of an emergency, In the event that GRANTOR must engage in ground disturbing activities to maintain,repair, or replace such Items on the Property.GRANTOR shall give the GRANTEE reasonable advance notice prior to such maintenance.repair, or replacement. In the event of an emergency. GRANTOR shall attempt to give GRANTEE notice of ground disturbing activities by telephone. GRANTOR shall not interfere with or damage the GRANTEE'S pipeline in performing such maintenance,repair, or replacement. GRANTOR warrants and will forever defend the title to the Property-against all persons claiming by,through, and under the GRANTOR subject to those Exceptions set forth on Exhibit B.attached hereto and made a part hereof by reference. GRANTEES obligations hereunder shall be enforceable against the GRANTEE.Its successors'and assigns by GRANTORS,their heirs successors,and assigns. GRANTOR • Richard L.Salberg CHARLES H.llOBBS By Richard L.Salberg Title: Attorney in Fact and Agent for Charles H.Hobbs BRUCE L. HOBBS QeLJ rM By: Richard L Salberg Title: Attorney in Fact and Agent for Bruce L. Hobbs BARBARA K BUCKLEW p By a L.E-/ Salberg r . g41.8 Title: Attorney in Fact and Agent for Barbara K Buckiew JUDITH A HENRYJ n n Q �lct Lt.t CL� By Richard L Salberg Title: Attorney In Fact and Agent for Judith-A. Henry MICHAEL HOBBBS By Richard L Salberg Title: -Attorney in Fact and Agen for Michael W. Hobbs 2484148 B-1540 P-764 04/04/96 02:45P PG 3 OF 8 ]III�IU IIII III ; I!I Iffll�ll�® NI: STATE OF COLORADO 1 ss. COUNTY OF BOULDER 1 The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 15tb day of March 1996. by Richard L Salbcrg.Individually and as Attorney In Fact and Agent for Charles H. Hobbs. Bruce L Hobbs. Barbara K.Busklcw,Judah A Henry.and Michael W. Hobbs. '= • My-commission expires October 16, 1998. ..4.itloril•kNthicaatiss my hand and official seal. -;. l� �.a �-i: AY1 . ULIrG;-rj`; ''.: `� ; Notary Public " COLD . 2484148 B-1540 P-764 04/04/96 02:45P PG 4 OF 8 f . L+d..a eater mauu 4 ill IL :II I -- I>i 91111®ID Il LEGAL DESCRIPTION FILE NO. 1001487 'EXHIBIT A' PERMANENT EASEMENT AN UNDIVIDED 53.1251 INTEREST IN THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PROPERTY: A PORTION OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE EAST HALF OF TIIE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 16, AND THE NORTH HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 21, BOTH IN TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANCE 68 WEST OF THE 6T11 PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, WELD COUNTY, COLORADO, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTH QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 16; THENCE N01 DECREE 12 MINUTES 44 SECONDS W ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 16 A DISTANCE OF 15.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SO0 DECREES 02 MINUTES 41 SECONDS W ALONG A LINE BEING 15.00 FEET NORTHERLY OF AND PARALLEL WITH THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 16 A DISTANCE OF 817.76 FEET; THENCE SOO DECREES 46 MINUTES 10 SECONDS E A DISTANCE OF 121.48 FEET; THENCE S80 DEGREES 57 MINUTES 52 SECONDS W A DISTANCE OF 182_2.24 FEET: THENCE NO0 DECREES 18 MINUTES 28 SECONDS W ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 21 A DISTANCE OF 50.00 FEET: THENCE N88 DEGREES 57 MINUTES 52 SECONDS E A DISTANCE OF 1771.84 FEET: THENCE MOO DEGREES 46 MINUTES 10 SECONDS W A DISTANCE OF 121.55 FEET; THENCE N89 DEGREES 02 MINUTES 41 SECONDS E ALONG A LINE BEING 65.00 FEET NORTHERLY OF AND PARALLEL WITH THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 16 A DISTANCE OF 867.17 FEET; THENCE SO1 DEGREE 12 MINUTESC 11S E ALONc THEEASTERLY LINE F THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 16 A DISTANCE OF 50.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. COUNTY OF WELD, STATE OF COLORADO. MARLA M. MCOMBER PLS 24961 MERRICK 6 COMPANY P.O. BOX 22026 DENVER, CO 80014 NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON CREATING NEWLY CREATED LEGAL DESCRIPTION (18-75-106.5 C.R.5.) 2484148 B-1540 P-764 04/04/96 02:45P PG 5 OF 8 1IMILIMII611.na HI T lIliul61111111f1- • • A portion of S1/2E1/2SW1/4 Section 16 & N1/2NW1/4 Section 21 Township 3 North, Range 68 West, 6thP.U. • Weld County, Colorado POI. • . 0..N ---•—•••• ••4106P-Der teed?_au.em /t teas,[. S OnYulit/4 ev. of pin(113Dn' C s ern;. 1411144._ViSIT.S cli w 10.07 sick.N r I .PVO,' ._'^_1 ,t rin E..e.aa II W Co _ treJ IO.a... 0 1 i II JJc9 a •ea (IJAQY all) uT 51P 'I R ;x! 11; I P. E... I: I x.wr.e.tnlr. a _ I' Aka kcrs411011 a[.al, O ffi•-P •1,!�{ptI I, j_s0.1P(4ct11}1tT ' vI ch I.•mrl Cn®rit A Z I tics w0. III IS DTJ6'b' C o (0.151 0.R) M17i.eB am' M N W.5y1I •N . • 0 17.6t'1' I. " t ID 1 1; . - - I..w.1(penal ll ISO on id:ill _ - .�-"(14'%.GII) . . w4 .010 Ili!. Il;ll .. - Co o al... !p: _ - 1 C� ., ey R»i.19]10 //��I. �,1I .1, . co �' .-1 Ij. .. /. heels, •o.w ICI 1 / .--n.n,a.nl •tleN I-. • - n. S%6 k•cesbll3 ''I / •lid • 0CS Ave 1F' a�NY (((44.410 I.n EeIU ,', UN x'11/6 kc- . t1ray�C9.CI,I 1.r•.�a j Spice T S xi/14. ale.T -- WO' ... .1-Qr-J -T41 - . lnr 0.1 C ' • I^M r.r1 la .N kn k•ON,pet Gk/1'NC StAlj x.0.:I-50-11 Sean N l.a l^'.e.l Caveat h.•I. 13.1<a l a a x.ay: 4-16-23.ea,.4... !none,lnaat Y..C• 0.161 o0. i � j t.µr.W 1.•p_[.nlr `......nl t......t.... - 1145.o. 1 I• we PRCPARCO ST UtRRIOC k COMPANY • • %b° NO. 1R-1144 MARTHA J. BENSON, etas. N.C.W.C.D. Black 0.110 vecict. s SC Ii k 11 11FMDP J SCAM '-'a 6p Y.51 yµl:1'.100' iO. Kook�xi WI W�1611 FLT C01.01. CalvesIAa IT r FT.LUPION - NUOS1ON .. • MTNI' OAS. 1.10-n USA PPUK '• -- :e1�.Yr.?C1: • - T — Ii IIIII>hulrill I EXHIBIT B Commitment Number' 1001 4 . The policy or policies to be issued will contain eXceptloos to the folleving unless the Sane are disposed of to the satisfaction of the Company: 1. Rights or claims of parties in possession not shown by the public records. 2. Easements or claims of easements not shown by the public records. 3. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortages in area, encroachments, and and facts which a correct survey and inspection of the premises would disclose and which are not shown by the public records. 4. Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor, or material heretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law and not shown by the public records. S. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, if any; created, first appearing in the records or attaching subsequent to the effective dace hereof but prior to the date the proposed insured acquired of record for value the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. 6: .Taxes or special assessments which are not shown as existing liens by the public records. 7. ALL TAXES AND ASSESSMENTS, NOW OR H3STOFORE ASSESSED, DUE OR PAYABLE. S. EASEMENT AND RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH LINES AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES GRANTED DO THE MOUNTAIN STATES TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH CO. AS SET FORTH IN INSTRUMINT RECORDED KAY 7, 1930, IN BOOR 894 AT PAGE 390, UPON THE TEARS AND CONDITIONS THEREIN SET FORTS, 9. RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR PIPELINES AND LNCIDENAL PURPOSES, UPON THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS t3CPREIN SET FORTH AS GRANTED TO PANHANDLE EASTERN PIPE LINE COMPANY BY INSTRU≥*E.YT RECORDED DECsD,BER 1. 1981, IN BOOK 954 AT RECEPTION NO. 1876097. NOTICE OF CENTRAL DESCRIPTION OF APIA SERVE WAS RECORDED JulE 26, 1986, IN BOOK 1117 AT RECEPTION NO. 2058722, SAID INTEREST RAS BEEN CONVEYED TO EN FRONT RANGE GATHERING COMPANY, A COLORADO CORPORATION, BY INSTRUMENT RECORDED APRIL 5, 1933, IN BOOK 1376 AT RECEPTION NO. 2327621 AND HAS BEEN ENCUMBERED BY A MORTGAGE GRANTED TO NATIONSBANC LEASING CORPORATION, A NORTH CAROLINA CORPORATION, RECORDED APRIL 7, 1993, IN BOOK 1377 AT RECEPTION NO. 2327864. 10. AN EASEACNT FOR AN IRRIGATION WATER PIPELINE AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES GRANTED TO XTTELEY FARMS, A GENERAL PARTNERSE:?, AS SET FORTH AND DESCRIBED IN INSTRU1CNT RECORDED JANUARY 14, 1983, IN ROOK 996 AT RECEPTION NO. 1914355, UPON THE TEAMS AND CONDITIONS THEREIN SET, FORTH. 11. EAS}[71T AND RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR GAS PIPELINES TO PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO, A COLORADO CORPORATION, AS EVIDENCED BY PLAT RECORDED OCTOBER 28, 1994, IN BOOK 1465 AT RECEPTION NO. 2112934. 12. NOTICE PURSUANT TO 9-1,5-103, C.R.S., CONCERNING UNDERGROUND FACILITIES OF UNITED POWER, INC., RECORDED JANUARY 24, 1991, IN BOOK 1288 AT RECEPTION NO. 2239296. 13. EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS-OF-WAY FOR WATER LINES OWNED BY LITTLE THOMPSON VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AND OVERHEAD ELECTRIC PRESUMED TO BELONG: TO UNITED POWER, INC., 2484148 B-1540 P-764 04/04/96 02:45P PG 7 OF 8 IMINllI11II ; ill IT I f • As SHOWN ON SURVEY ENTITLED MARTHA J. BENSON, ET AL., JOB No. 27'2-1184, DATED • FEBRUARY 28, 1995, PREPARED BY HERRICK & COMPANY. 14. EASEO.NT AND RIGHT-OF-NAY FOR WELD COUNTY ROAD 5 AND WELD COUNTY ROAD 32. 2484148 B-1540 P-764 04/04/96 02:45P PG 8 OF 8 • 1fV r t Efiii �a 1 : 1, SERIAL 1.txt Parcel name: SERIAL 1 North: 6484.9894 East : -7728. 5480 Line Course: 5 00-01-06 E Length: 30.00 North: 6454.9894 East : -7728. 5384 Line Course: N 79-04-12 W Length: 150.00 North: 6483 .4308 East : -7875.8173 Line Course: N 77-51-22 E Length: 150.00 North: 6514.9859 East : -7729. 1739 Line Course: S 01-11-44 E Length: 30.00 North: 6484.9925 East : -7728. 5480 Perimeter: 360.00 Area: 4,418 sq. ft. 0. 101 acres mapcheck Closure - (uses listed courses, radii , and deltas) Error Closure: 0.0031 Course: N 00-36-25 W Error North: 0.00309 East : -0.00003 Precision 1: 116, 129.03 Page 1 SERIAL 2.txt Parcel name: SERIAL 2 North: 6454.9878 East : -7728. 5383 Line Course: N 86-01-08 W Length: 750.00 North: 6507.0585 East : -8476.7286 Line Course: N 89-23-33 E Length: 747. 60 North: 6514.9850 East : -7729.1706 Line Course: S 77-51-22 W Length: 150.00 North: 6483 .4299 East : -7875 .8140 Line Course: S 79-04-12 E Length: 150.00 North: 6454.9885 East : -7728. 5350 Perimeter: 1797.60 Area: 18,019 sq. ft. 0.414 acres mapcheck Closure - (uses listed courses, radii , and deltas) Error Closure: 0.0034 Course: N 78-01-41 E Error North: 0.00070 East : 0.00331 Precision 1: 528, 705 .88 Page 1 SERIAL 3.txt Parcel name: SERIAL 3 North: 6454.9878 East : -7728. 5383 Line Course: N 86-01-08 W Length: 750.00 North: 6507 .0585 East : -8476.7286 Line Course: S 87-06-09 W Length: 1501.60 North: 6431. 1536 East : -9976.4089 Line Course: N 89-23-33 E Length: 2248.00 North: 6454.9884 East : -7728. 5352 Perimeter: 4499. 60 Area: 67,440 sq. ft. 1. 548 acres Mapcheck Closure - (Uses listed courses, radii , and deltas) Error closure: 0.0032 course: N 79-08-33 E Error North: 0.00059 East : 0.00310 Precision 1: 1, 406, 125 .00 ( . Page 1 SERIAL 4.txt Parcel name: SERIAL 4 North: 6454.9878 East : -7728. 5383 Line Course: S 00-01-06 E Length: 329.90 North: 6125 .0878 East : -7728.4328 Line Course: S 20-26-51 W Length: 143 .00 North: 5991.0978 East : -7778. 3897 Line Course: S 00-01-06 E Length: 2158. 53 North: 3832 . 5679 East : -7777.6990 Line Course: S 89-23-50 W Length: 2591.45 North: 3805 . 3052 East : -10369.0056 Line Course: S 88-56-06 W Length: 30.01 North: 3804. 7474 East : -10399.0104 Line Course: N 00-01-52 E Length: 2652 .10 North: 6456.8470 East : -10397. 5703 Line Course: N 00-08-59 W Length: 30.00 North: 6486.8469 East : -10397.6487 Line Course: N 89-42-11 E Length: 30.00 North: 6487.0024 East : -10367.6491 Line Course: N 89-23-33 E Length: 1891.02 North: 6507 .0523 East : -8476.7354 Line Course: S 87-06-09 W Length: 1501. 60 North: 6431. 1474 East : -9976.4157 Line Course: N 89-23-33 E Length: 2248.00 North: 6454.9822 East : -7728. 5421 Perimeter: 13605.60 Area: 6,959,630 sq. ft. 159.771 acres Mapcheck Closure - (uses listed courses, radii , and deltas) Error Closure: 0.0067 Course: S 33-50-27 w Error North: -0.00560 East : -0.00375 Precision 1: 2 ,030, 688 .06 k Page 1 I ' '�'/I3c/-% )" F/) '7/,/ , LARGE MAPS AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING AT THE CLERK TO THE BOARD'S OFFICE, IN THE PUBLIC REVIEW FILE. Annexation Impact Deport Sorrento Estates_Annexation NAME OF ANNEXATION: Sorrento Estates Annexation The purpose of this report is to satisfy the requirements of CRS 31-12-108.5 which indicates that a municipality shall prepare an Annexation Impact Report and file a copy of the report with the Board of County Commissioners governing the area proposed to be annexed. Attached to this report are the following: • A map showing the present and proposed boundaries of the Town of Mead in the vicinity of proposed annexation. A Vicinity Map is attached. • Impact Report Map — Showing the present streets, major trunk water mains, sewer interceptors and outfalls, other utility lines and ditches, and the proposed extension of such streets and utility lines in the vicinity of the proposed annexation; and • Impact Report Map — Showing the existing and proposed land use pattern in the area to be annexed; a. The area of the proposed annexation is presently being used for cultivated agriculture. The petitioner of the annexation intends to develop the property for low density residential use in accordance with the Town of Mead Comprehensive Plan and development standards. See Concept Plan. b. Attached to this report is a copy of a pre-annexation agreement between the petition and the Town of Mead. A pm-annexation agreement is not anticipated for this project a The Town of Mead, Little Thompson Water District and St. Vrain Sanitation District service providers plan to extend services into the area of the above referenced annexation. The developer will be responsible for the cost of extending streets and utilities to serve the development. The required transportation infrastructure improvements for Adams Avenue (Weld County Road 32) will be extended from the southwest corner of the proposed Range View development to Weld County Road 5. At this time, the Range View Plat is currently in design. The developer of Sorrento Estates Annexation is contributing to a proportional share agreement with the developer of Range View Estates for design and construction of the Little Thompson Water District's 12 inch water main extension from Single Tree Estates west to the Sorrento Estates Annexation. Sorrento EstatesAnnezation I Annexation Impact Report Landmark Engineering Ltd. 3/18/2007 The Sorrento Estates Annexation developer has financed the design and proposed installation of a 15 inch sewer main to be extended from south of Highway 66 north to the southwest corner of the Sorrento Estates Annexation development. Funding for the construction has been contributed to the St. Vrain Sanitation District and construction should begin in the spring of 07. d. The following entities are currently providing services within the Sorrento Estates Annexation vicinity. SCHOOL DISTRICT: St. Vrain Valley School District FIRE DISTRICT: Mountain View Fire District SANITATION DISTRICT: St. Vrain Sanitation District WATER DISTRICT: Northern Colorado Water Little Thompson Water District ELECTRIC POWER: United Power e. The applicant plans to develop 175 residential units in the form of single family detached residential units within the area to be annexed. Housing Type No. of Units Single Family Detached 175 School Grade No. of Students Elementary(0.35) 62 Junior High (0.14) 25 Senior High (0.17) 30 Total 117 Students As has been approved by the School District, a 'cash-in-lieu' fee of approximately $645.00 per lot will be assessed at the time of building permit in lieu of land dedication to the School District for a school site. Sorrento Estates Annexation 2 Annexation Impact Report Landmark Engineering Ltd. 3/18/2007 • • • r1,��[.a, Iw. µ • AROM • 9178' wK+ax �e ��•�9rIR,r ,/� \lIIIliri 111111111 �► . _ ►.,11� 4444 sK!In ' 1 „ alt VICINITY MAI, In-2OOO Sorrento Estate:Annexation 3 Annexation Impact Report Landmark Engineering Ltd. 3/18/2007 LARGE MAPS AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING AT THE CLERK TO THE BOARD'S OFFICE, IN THE PUBLIC REVIEW FILE. �' •FwX'liRFplW'I%:`nmYryi. {�tlmpAR iV.lMRab(OI!' F. 6 q`p I TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS LIBERTY PR®PERRY:' WELD„COUNTY', COLORADO a. . . . . . . .. ... . ..... . ..----•-... $ s TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS, INC .r.-a.,. ,...'„�, LSC TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS, INC.. f r a L. _ 1889 York Street Denver, CO 80206 (303)333-1105 in FAX (303) 333-1107 `` is:o E-mail: Ise@lsedenver.com .war Web Site: http://www.lscdenver.corn r- - . .. TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS, INC. .. January 30, 2007 I Mr. Ken Merritt li 4 Landmark Engineering, Ltd. 3521 W. Eisenhower Boulevard r Loveland, CO 80537 r Re: Liberty Property j' s:" Weld County, CO (LSC #070080) r,; :3 Dear Mr. Merritt: F F-. We are pleased to submit our Traffic Impact Study for the proposed Liberty Property develop il - C' ment located in Weld County, Colorado. This study first provides a summary of the existing roadways and traffic volumes in the vicinity of the proposed development and a summary of f planned improvements to the roadway system. Next, estimates are made of the amount and "A V directional distribution of vehicular traffic likely to be generated. This information is then 4 combined with projected future traffic volumes in the vicinity to evaluate the impact of the new r �. development on the future roadway system and,where appropriate, to make recommendations ti i; for the required roadway improvements. lie: We trust that our findings and recommendations will assist in the planning for the proposed j Liberty Property development. Please call us if we can be of further assistance. )ri Respectfully submitted, RE LSC Transportation Consultant , �S pM,y T�:E a i , O1 "" ::4; 35827 E • 04 *:: '- ,:enj. .in T. Waldm. �.E �'�,`�......•••'•c ,. BTW/w �30 L \\Server 0\fde_servcr\LSC\Projects\2007\070080\Report\TOC Liberty Property.wpd f' t.-..4. Y 4,4N.u.r+u'a ,r3rs"C. ,UW.afg ks.«tlS.ib: '"'.".t,'x,+' .Shy:::;e ..""� `ra++:?iS,e"h;;.'3staAFet $ k"T r: e Traffic Impact Analysis Liberty Property Weld County, Colorado • F.: Prepared for Landmark Engineering, Ltd. 3521 W. Eisenhower Boulevard E,. Loveland, CO 80537 Prepared by LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc. 1889 York Street Denver, CO 80206 ' (303) 333-1105 L January 30, 2007 (LSC #070080) is r TABLE OF CONTENTS f. Section • Description Page pr A Introduction 1 B Roadway and Traffic Conditions 2 • C Traffic Generation 8 D Traffic Distribution 10 E Traffic Assignment 13 F Traffic Impacts 18 G Recommendations 24 i H Conclusions Appendix A: Existing Traffic 25 I Appendix B: Internal Capture Summary Appendix C: Intersection Level of Service Analysis t LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS t, c, Figure Description Page 1 Vicinity Map 4 , 2 Existing Traffic, Traffic Control and Lane Geometry 5 3 Year 2010 Background Traffic 6 4 Year 2030 Background Traffic 7 • 5 Year 2010 Directional Distribution of Site-Generated Traffic 11 6 Year 2030 Directional Distribution of Site-Generated Traffic 12 7 Assignment of Year 2010 Site-Generated Traffic 14 ' 8 Assignment of Year 2030 Site-Generated Traffic 15 9 Year 2010 Total Traffic 10 Year 2030 Total Traffic 16 17 11 Year 2010 Assumed Lane Geometry and Traffic Control 20 a 21 2 12 Year 2030 Assumed Lane Geometry and Traffic Control 13 Year 2030 Average Daily Traffic Impacts 23 • LIST OF TABULATIONS Table Description Page 1 Estimated Traffic Generation 9 2 Intersections Level of Service 22 c SECTION A Introduction The Liberty Property mixed-use development is planned for a parcel of land located to the southeast of the intersection of Weld County Road (WCR) 32 and WCR 5 in Weld County, il Colorado. The 149-acre site is proposed to contain about 175 single-family dwelling units and a 40,000 square-foot health/fitness center. I LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc. has been retained by Landmark Engineering, Ltd. to prepare a Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) of the development, consistent with the require- ments of the Town of Mead and the Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT). This r impact analysis identifies the impacts of the development on the surrounding roadway t . system and describes its access requirements. Specific steps taken in this analysis g process are described below: • A review and analysis of present roadway and traffic conditions in the • 1.` vicinity of the site. IT • A determination of the amount of peak-hour and average weekday traffic that would be generated by the proposed development and an analysis of the directional distribution of that traffic on the surrounding roadway system. a:•: • A projection of future background traffic volumes on the adjacent street system for Years 2010 and 2030 to estimate short and long term impacts: t'` • A determination of future traffic impacts associated with the proposed development. These impacts are based upon estimates of the total amount f- of traffic on the surrounding roadway system in the vicinity of the develop- ment. ;, • A determination of street and access improvements that will be necessary ,( • to mitigate the traffic impacts associated with the proposed development. r-, a,. rate t i p Liberty Property(LSC#070080) January 30, 2007 a LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc. Page 7 E., l r FnF SECTION B Roadway and Traffic Conditions The location of the proposed Liberty Property development is shown in Figure 1. Also • shown in Figure 1 are known developments in the vicinity of the proposed site. Access to the site is proposed via a single full movement access on WCR 5 and two full move- ment access points on WCR 32. Li Area Roadways F'? Major roadways in the vicinity of the site are described below with a brief discussion of anticipated future roadway improvements. Existing lane geometry and traffic controls r` are shown in Figure 2. • SH 66 is a two-lane east-west roadway with continuity from SH 36 on the west to SH 85 on the east. It is classified as a Regional Highway (R-A) according to the Colorado State Highway Access Code. The posted speed limit in the vicinity of the site is currently 60 mph. • WCR 7 is a two-lane north-south roadway with continuity from WCR 26 on the south to SH 60 on the north, at the northern boundary of Weld County. WCR 7 P. is classified as a two-lane minor arterial in the Mead Transportation Plan written by FHU in August, 2006. Its intersection with SH 66 is currently signalized. • WCR 5 is a two-lane north-south roadway with continuity from WCR 26 on the south to SH 60 on the north at the northern boundary of Weld County. Its intersection with SH 66 is currently controlled with north/south-facing Stop signs. A full movement access on WCR 5 south of WCR 32 is proposed as part G of the project. WCR 5 is classified as a major arterial and is projected to have two through lanes (one through lane in each direction) though Year 2030 in the f' Mead Transportation Plan. • WCR 32 is an unpaved, two-lane, east-west roadway with continuity from WCR 17 on the east to WCR 3 on the west. Two full movement access points on WCR 32 are proposed as part of the project. WCR 32 is classified as a two- lane minor arterial in the Mead Transportation Plan. i o Existing Traffic Conditions Existing traffic volumes are also shown in Figure 2 and are based on manual peak-hour r .: traffic counts performed by Counter Measures, Inc. in February of 2006 (SH 66/WCR 7) and November 2005 (SH 66/WCR 5 and WCR 32/WCR 5). The raw count data is Liberty Property (LSC#070080) January 30, 2007 LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc. Page 2 f f . included in Appendix A. Figure 2 also shows existing daily traffic volumes on SH 66, r WCR 32, and WCR 5, which were obtained from 24-hour road tube counts conducted by Counter Measures, Inc. in February 2004 (SH 66) and November 2005 (WCR 32 and WCR 5). SH 66 (west of WCR 7) currently carries about 15,310 vehicles per day, WCR 32 (east of WCR 5) currently carries about 100 vehicles per day, and WCR 5 (south of WCR 32) currently carries approximately 1,050 vehicles per day. i I Future Traffic Conditions Years 2010 and 2030 were chosen as the design years for the project. Year 2010 is the r year the western portion of the proposed project is expected to be built out. Year 2030 e:. is the 20-year horizon used for most long range planning forecasts. Year 2010 and 2030 background traffic projections are depicted in Figures 3 and 4, respectively. These future traffic projections were derived from the Year 2030 daily traffic r projections shown in the Mead Transportation Plan. Background traffic does not include the traffic expected to be generated by the proposed development. rk•. a U F.". 1 L. f::e • Liberty Property (LSC#070080) January 30, 2007 LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc. Page 3 [3.. • N. `Y Q.' • •U U r In e t • .• R. '.;:4"°;;,.:-..-. ..-!:.:::4 �"fr .At,, '•1 r 't +'$Ci -'a�y,.t')'-' 35 5 r:MIye x fnal..-T r X34 O•• ti : �J}i 1,x •` k+f7,*r ''FtJ ',A; if f R.'�.fy,, 4.1lt, 94,Fhs�'� ? ' • ',.T _. r E • —s — y '+1�31w 'if', w•t77}`'S 1.a . P��4 �J ' f i' • � � .: 4:j c L:ti. Z > '"-a� 7).u 1 t Via' r } '�". f r 17•,, ;� '� "`.: �, - rt Sr ' t tp E at y • aflt� {i fi i ^'�,,'7. r . ' A .i. }ti c1+• 1•4,3's Q * •^•J •ft i� �L. 444'4 'l•i'l' .e.4c4fJ' 1 t-• ' `• S iWf� Jy f..G . S ...d"./.•- T ..S6 TTBixh "Vit'2 ,r,r r 't '' "}! a_ar •�^1;" w i ,*+1 of:"`°`a'!M>*7 .:i li F4 :." a.+ j a�`I 0 Fu..l 's a S D L 1't� 3rF ri a.h tr i ° i ':i•,.. 1 r7 r 4 f �.s� . �, y1�t^C�f*• ..:�� ' t1,w r.r a yAM 94:41 "'I' � t;^ e. _,,7-r.Rw.t tai.', 4 t 7� i�ft ; x hyt: yr 1 NY • �, tl e''.'rrt �i*gbFs z �4a' ' S� F F. y, i t, -rt 4,..,., �; d •t" yY'y �fd ,-,,,r,....iii- is: 'A '} d. F ?k3�Sr -�5 I I 1.x 1� p'P, ! c kyj tjE YN a e ram 3 r ,,,,,,,,,A.,,...,,,,,4-A,YL t '.v A . 4w. n Pry? i, x -:1'ti +,` zix r p a kt� ti: }lbst }. ,+{„ ".:. r� c�.�e 4 j 3� "�5 yt 4'_/r y'�rL • 1}'-t xt,.4y rr• 1 • • • \ .Y ti„� I •.'4'14:T"4 fIt of 14 � t�11 • ,.. �,• �' \7 iyiF' ` k Y 4: � } l t ay f r>.u'k . .x^.c,, m sV 1.1�r. - r .f Z "'F5i�+t' � +F i ti'; 't • ,1R 1!•••,,i* ,r. ,.,. • i t` y ! ! ., w�Cd I. .y` ♦ Tr .CLSxaT. . ?. t • e .•` ,w: ,r 1rY,�b. ,.,5. .• �'. 1 *1 Laf'r""' t '"' "` x„ � ` , 'v s f�on 54 j i16, y,,..., .� '.� ,ti^ {!!{,� .S. �3�� a`j .-r ,,777""r14-'37-17,1,Ew(d,99.1�{tv 1Lt-•r y.s. t '+ ,�SL i ;'Cy., r� M1 • k _. ... ly •y .j V.!-.5.-,"':',•:.� ," ri 1 ,, •W Y �" t ro "$.44v, err. %t i ins,✓, xi eR,.9 It♦ ,� tF_•� ,�f C s..r l ",""_- r -Y i,ui o 4. 1 ..^n ..,..i5.;,.., ' 1.nt i7 °f� I '.�►, ',�ir74° 65y `Ytir aJ'^ 1. 4 I•li,1 y• �,t, i' vx r ,.1 ,,1.' • . t • -� •}, ' ..5' { 1 :5.,... i"•1JR.F •- *"� .&Sh 1 l..P�, 'V'h- .,-,* aaru t fyyyy Q.• 7rt a ,� - U r • .5,:_ :,,,f:� Vie •7�"F kl •v'4. Y [ C k'---7--...1,":„,,,...i., • ;,. 411r4..%::".., � r, .}'@`" '• 1 t t,,,A. ,rr'• c,.• 4�. a_�q Ritt 4'4 U Er T • f' G r''F' J, y� d0 t Mrk V t L iii ?] t�' A.''dw' .• t`it b 1 `� .. Ioi' i act § -_S ti ,.S k1"I Y r't ,.,S"�"�`c» I 4i,:;; ;:,-:,.:.•.,,:-..• 41 t1a• •�r 4M1" �`'w ct ,ir{i; /•- +, r r !' 6?) Ly�,-.,, l y1.. 4!'y b• \ wa ....a. I •jf 2't'I �yFw�l t rZF i,..;--14.4,:,..,,' { `;;V.15.4.,,,, 1 tit 4.µ..t..,,✓f 'N•' e P �,JI W.:1,1•••,474915 t9, r 1aT 1 it'1. : N� 1 r .TFitt. t y ,6141 +f ,...tit bI4^7't t'rt.� �v`!'N.. r '7:Z rF N4i '1, c •r} .• 'd ..,i4:".' ' .W.d. !.i` �x�"w'y� s j xr�.,r'C } r t.,tt° [ "tea �+�.ti 'rl � ..,„,r,, .� • ,..'.� .ib�16,d., 6 -F Xpl, 3s +.,1.J'•i�. �1 S�, iSsy a R Ki' .± 4 ` q` ��}q, w F T • 71...,„:„.„.;,,,_.4 e ; j w;1 �Allp�y7vy w Yi h." o.• 4 yy .��Yff,,,r • _�e_ ly, t��'� fid� a�1 •^'4 _ ', 1 wa ft' '..;.'&4.S, "4T-T.• 'v !F �, ± I k Lrit4 I �5 l,..1.',...•?.., +1. J ', • 11.^ H::• 1 •tc t. F)y_ .P(hy V1 T L T 'A' �fM�l ms.µ t -,,,11, r,¢f. y W { " r .• , w r.,,,,,,,,k1/4,,,4 n ;t� is c wit r4 .'.i! °1SF f s t h 1 9,v �.fy. ^r ,ti 1 . :.A I.}, A{�,'"a,. N 5 r ,. :Zi r'i `-s:,e. : �r:/ Vi fir• >,I41114 7 b4 k ac T 7 � • �;,r. . �Y �'z ...,,3 .. C ve'.. �. ., 3 i `M-5i n}' �t- 5.5: y Yc i 1 �-5 "rf Jt NN >d t,. '^n+ a ';05,...,,,,.. .54,,,,-5. ,t, i i.t'iF'4,{ a 1 fm3, • }rte l �. . t '•' ti 1F'4 '7 a T r1!l F }R4 . y'Fi.t x, r x 1 r 4.t "� - a 9 ,,N,,,f ,,. v t: .: �' J v' ,,p-c:',.....4,%.,, :Vt: i1'v r Y` 1 75 q N .l -..;,!..7„ '..•:'; +� ^! r , r ctsz .,,, I ,fi r,,i}j(7,/ 'Y i.y�• '' aa11�� ..1, tJ'y,�'1]i '"i t��.Tr w.'+ ,- t 4.4! d i WL. . ty.�. 4 -4'1'1 �{ YK�YF l� .ti T� ''� k 1�'tR li Yt�.ai+{�1R1.� T r, i�f • t •l 7 '1t7rr ° i .L iA F c -i •1 ` f ^JR R f ry I 4 e a '� a�•"'�: 1`i �� ,� z, 4h ...,,,t.!Trl Fs• ^ +s',,,1r i�g R <� e .r'}:.� x N -a.Wt�• k9 t l�s 4:-.; �. ', t 4- .S1 d 1'T'^,I F i r I . .��^ +1Ti� I.ir.i 1 . •�. I 5 7 .,K. tiF,v-rx>!# i t A'tk' 47:. F. � ,. t44'i.�r 1u*ta}`�6t { $',.'�"''Y^7`t74*fir .i pp xx 'i. � y1 • QNr 4 ;•G"'it�F.1}..�Y �7 r r � è .e/?GSM! 1.: 1° r+ 1 t�' 1 i •. .' r e i la' t ycpas, } v ,. Y n >r 11iai 11 r. —•uI -L r� ,1. ,aka•► ,•• I r rP'K as � t +�'f� A. e i 'r.- ! .L8 i ` r.r et'S•k1e•r P#+ v rl r�l w fry.ri411.t 1� ..1.fHei' rt 1 '�F/ � � *`,lr' f r OL' ��i { .r G t� :,,{F�{3+ �- ai^+r� f�i p �y. �•1, �r '(r'r`'r.i�.7 b ,y l^ . t 4 k'w^ r r ,� ...r... e y'F'it It(`'Il skix 1.. }}r t " e x. t a1k t 4r4dL x nns a 2 3, fM •r .rT 1 a a . ^. 1R'1 i tJr�1, •w1su" a'G.tiL I'd lqh. 4 .33 + 1f 5•4144..„'„; t 5 � rb„ trwiiLL.ati.. ;. Aic ,n l>•r:S•'' 4.`'tl'ti tv°, �r," x, .h • V SLY L ,1 •.•'""•P -'..' .« -''R"A t o yro..a- A s S 3, ' .: •r ,+.. '4-•' ..AA 1 lam, 4 3 P• �� ' .ij �"41:ss4d f'K� sJ J '}T - 1 �\ ;5k..,54'' k•,. Fii. '`!'-`•---'' r; >. .r- �t„ x `. ,� .4' � r 7 tui < Sl.�.'1,� ',t.71'T it ,<, 5i ' `' Iis�"t.! - r ,r �`-' v .+..�, ,, f'.o h�7 n�' �r�'�'�� x�. �S�c'�t�3ly -�a� A.4.;-,. `*i•� :<•a t ��rr�ti. f =rrt.: •;r � 7 �* 1� 0 r �t %� ,1.�,�f 4 zi,,S..k7,1,1"":41 G14 i Lz 51 - t ,fb},,s+ , . i'.r' ! t ^T..:$14!'.41C.-', Q;44,, ''''''',....."'''',',.,41-..';',•;^'4,1f;:',; i r.M t�tr-')i vs.s f'n'M i 1 r:VS:Z:014 �Y ,.fa..� :. :..,..,:,,,,,,,T. d- F +.^,f { ;1,,�Y+#.r,. :,. J t 11 w'�' !4 ,, 1 t41, '•,,,A 4 pXY +L,a.!` r,.., i, .t✓i`.4,t r ,1 l,.: + ••a 1 {ti i iA i'p. r H e l.+t n f t R� ;Y t J T•>. t y. . , • 1 'L e I r l C 1k :✓r^ • Jl l } � . } •� rr'i,,,*1.4,1 x� r. Iii F i 1 _;�41.P�r ,�dyy.� -�x.a�� 1 c 7 } i } { T A ,itlA.n�a ,ri YCe t�• 11 e) a,11 r'p ,Kr pl�4.- e 7> t -•1h 4 t' I a ' 1 r{�m� 4 � .,,g-� t ,A,y 'r45.#55.,:t.-45 Z 24";41 ,Cril'1., L'64 t�? �� 1 •.iJ^'T•• s4P1 r. `� "` :. F .' r'1►„ ry `` � ;,'.;.3:'.4.7'4''• `-77',.%j,:$�" ?�. W-,r• t r'' ? •" A s...ri *1 a.� Y. tEX 1 '-.,[-.fr i.i • �..,...� �''.''.sr '.4r ' let • "r'Hee,,7��'5'ti.+JJ i, t �. ._;.5.Mikir:..-tt t t. G,_..u..:..a...w'+.' • -4-AL,.• -;.v., .tj-V, .,-'437 - t.. ,. '1s, _.`1 tY+.1 4`�' iY i. p..:.w " Y 1,414 e S .1::.:lrnrii :3t1, 2007 �. 1'e l fic 4 F L) >N 06; . h4 I — O O e i. 0 cu r U !- sad 4 i — sZ-I I� C li 4.1 1 •k W I O 1 -t—., 11 I C I O 1 ( , 1 V 1 I 1 1 i L ?DM 1 I I I al; I I O I M y.�` 1 Li') 7--- o m N n I ,-- n i / _ rj� Cl1 N I _ _ — in J O M I ci p "I !'N N o u t \ N sir N U W :a, H w N. r• c H 0 I LD S NOM . m O = M In a. _ O - u f. \\,...... / f OT F- \�/ O Mt_ O \\ N O Jjt_ N = a J Lip - Zn ) o r.x • ( �o eve a a d K _,tr_7 (7, > . r N N'Zi �� 1� I� o I 2. Z O M W N N J rn Ara i January 30, 2007 Page 5 i�ls . M v •O U 00 0 0.L. it L.O.'',`n V) Y E_ CZ-I r Z � N w e \ 1 CC try I I i I s I L ND o _o \ Os I i \ k..r. I t (-4 Nr \ r':' 0 1 S'S ND i I 47 *2- ai I-- ≥ \ DM 3 u O n S N 1/440 1 a 1/40 Y N 2 ° C k n d N r e_. o ^ ^ a• o rn'��f N a in on U ^ in 1. N ti v I N C cc, �NO m a hO J��. , Q KinItr '�N a` �o �^_ O N N x \\::::: 'Or E Y J N V] N.--,,-- \\"----__ O N v d N O a a I V N R 6,9 U A > w • a $ & Z g M Z W o W N INC J ti 4 January 30, 2007 Page 6 [ , \ 7 O .0 z P ® , § okA / O 2 \ Si, { , gZ| / { x& ) x ° \ / } ‘ [ I I § ! / t z Q t / � , I I LDM e . I / 2 & (---- , -------- � \ , ,,,„,„ e ! �x in- j ` S'S ND --<,)i _ / to \ , I u E it ` - § \ DM / me \ : cu 01 /}g�(r 1710 }; - in �6 9|c &2 " \ %° —Jr' 10 \ " � � ` ` `� r =cna 7 = , 2 ! II \ \ 3 ( \ \ z \ INC January 30, 7 . Page7 SECTION C Traffic Generation The Liberty Property development is proposed to contain 175 single-family dwelling units and a 40,000 square foot health/fitness club. The amount of traffic that will be generated by the development in the two analysis years has been estimated using trip generation rates published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers in its report, Trip Generation, 7th Edition, 2003. The results of the generation analysis are given in Table 1. As indicated in Table 1, the Liberty Property Pro ert development is expected to generate about 2,723 external vehicle-trips per day (1,362 entering and 1,362 exiting vehicles in a 24- o hour period). This includes about 49 entering and 116 exiting vehicles during the morning peak-hour and 177 entering and 131 exiting vehicles during the evening peak- hour. r The trip generation estimates associated with full buildout of the site assume an internal capture rate of approximately nine percent. The percentage or internally captured trips r:, was calculated using procedures found in the ITE Trip Generation Handbook, 2004. The calculation table is attached in Appendix B. • t . Liberty Property (LSC#070080) LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc. January 30, 2007 Page 8 , t .`V .3/ '5. CO d f 2 % - / / CO 2 CO ® 2 ,_ — . co I a) .: O R 5 \ 0 0 U) = O - a3 c Tr CO N. R 7a - n « n V # S7-2 \ � > ° % m 7 In F Cal @ 2 co co on — n 0 $ r- csi a < 41, k -.- Z 0 \ 6 � 0 cm o @ y A T3 " $ a k ® 2 � I o w / 6 O s e WI c- o _ 2 CO ` •5 © o - O S � LL - $ I " / \ - d ■ 2 $ I � 3 � o � E 2 0 \ W .11 / c u e ? a) r-- in E / •� > 0 � ® j W < / 03 © 2 d f _ \ / a $ / Fi J / CO 3 / 2 �. Cl) F c LL & t , - _ / . 2 o c e o I:. ® � Cof Co$ 0 To c / 2 q ± 3 k $ 2 L. f `,I) _o O_ & ■ O % D . / 0 _ Cl) 2 � 7e CD E § / i E LL 7 § a D u L o it) / m b O b 2 Cr) al a) / @ f / �� January 30, 2007 Page 9 i r.: SECTION D r` Traffic Distribution The directional distribution of generated vehicular traffic on the roadways in the vicinity of the proposed Liberty Property development is one of the most important elements in f:, planning its specific access requirements and in determining its traffic impacts on surrounding roadways and intersections. Major factors which will influence the traffic distribution include: "i • The site's location relative to the population and activity centers in Weld County and the surrounding areas. t:' • The future roadway network serving the area. dr; c:.: • The specific access and circulation characteristics of the development plan. r„ 16 Based upon the influences described above, Figures 5 and 6 show the anticipated ; directional distribution of traffic to be generated by the Liberty Property development for Vic: the Year 2010 and 2030 street networks, respectively. As indicated, the following •.,, c.::; distribution is assumed for this analysis: To/From 2010 2030 West SH 66 50% 42% East SH 66 44% 32% North WCR 5 3% 13% 4'< South WCR 5 1% 10% West WCR 32 1% 1% East WCR 32 1% 2% i ti Liberty Property (LSC#070080) January 30, 2007 LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc. Page 10 tF ' F.' SECTION E Traffic Assignment Traffic Assignment Figures 7 and 8 illustrate the assignment of project-generated traffic. The assignment was derived by applying the estimates of the site-generated traffic from Table 1 to the directional distribution of site-generated traffic shown in Figures 5 and 6. The assign- ment varies between the two time horizons due to different distributions shown on ='1 Figures 5 and 6. These two figures show the number of project-generated vehicle turning movements expected at the intersections of SH 66/WCR 5, WCR 32/WCR 5 as well as a:> the three site access intersections. Background Traffic As mentioned in Section B, background traffic is defined as the traffic on the roadways "' without any consideration of project-generated traffic. It reflects traffic from surrounding developments and an "improved" future roadway network. Figures 3 and 4 show Years 2010 and 2030 background traffic, respectively. These fig ures p y. do not include any of the traffic generated by the proposed development. Year 2030 has been selected as an appropriate analysis year for evaluating future traffic impacts. It represents the time at which the surrounding developments are expected to be completed and roadway improvements made. P"- C.# Total Traffic For the Liberty Property Traffic Study, total traffic volumes are the sum of background traffic volumes plus project-generated traffic volumes. Project-generated traffic from Figures 7 and 8 has been added to the Year 2010 background traffic volumes from Figure 3 to yield Year 2010 total traffic, with these quantities being represented in Figure 9. Project-generated traffic from Figure 8 has been added to the Year 2030 back- ground traffic from Figure 4, with the resulting Year 2030 total traffic shown in Figure 10. Liberty Property (LSC#070080) January 30, 2007 LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc. Page 13 n O U v O N r = 4 N n` O^' T -� W O ``/ SZ-i O N N 44 Z Z Q) \ CU U ' (--- i 1- ;":: I tip(23 r-'° I 5 / i N r• M OJ O O / LNDM N — \ N o 3 ry " it rce n M U \ M N S'521D 0 0 LLJ w o 6 {` S II—DM 4N I p Lo o c Lo x 1 E Y a O N n v — n n N e N U_ N Y N N 0 p c, N c 4, �Ri' um O' _k �N R.R ^O w N ` 7 O N O it � �Ha : ₹ t97 1 Y 6:3 O N Uj mp N a U e 4 O o II ' R PJ January 30, 2007 Page 14 f v U o v c) oel p v� to ��.y n Y4 G' S -r-. Li: O `V O (V QSI I - -- a) EL — sz-I o C 0 N. Q x a�oic 4 tie ii5 it N M i'44 04 0 M / K :_ 3 I I L 10 1'I - s \ NI O tr s-S 2O 4 h I L1J I I— w sNDM 1 0 l0 Y v O I .u a o o ea p 6-1 o N 1- M f- 0 o E z V Y J _.....-lit- --) x MU O O ^ N 0j P a a o n Z M o W - Z g 0 a" W N J it 5 R . o January 30, 2007 Page 15 !. cc, cu o E.; „.11 Qo 0 p �Oo �1 �r k ti u... c Qy N ".C c �� (...—r.-•' --- S Z-f a r \ J ` \ h• 6 \ O O 1 7. hE! i I fir 0 I v O N N / y.. r M / M% O O r r / a 1 I L21JM I 1 , f—-- N u fir m \ S3M z m 1 o VD x c O f: ' _ a al a o In v a IN o 01.A IQ H N-r V ��L N v J L. S s � � e _ ` _ In o t e m N L N O Nr N N co Nip _ O a ~ O v v N °° f•• �01 1 f r .O ..-n- .0 rN � �fir�vl r z v7 Y} Y-1 \\.:„........_--6 .-7', `4 ^ N N O 3. •15IN O N O V :- 0. Q O $ w... I II r 1— Q) $O •�'' — l�n z fag. J w c o January 30, 2007 "` Page 16 o o ELu Oczo N Q O.y 1 SZ I �'W Lo a`• k. y.. \ J n^ \ h N 1 "1 l 1 t 'n rn n N 'n o co 'n / CC I L ≥JDM l o...s \ o o LI ,n \ I t�� O ,, N \ ..-+- _ 7, p S ID o I.� I L I ` ' u Ql __y' S 21JM o a ito Lc:= v c r': N a m .7'2 s A- in:-----.....-.\\\ a 07) i",-3' ..-. 1, rl 'r1 h U � it p 'n n 7 b w W JjL a _s JL a JL o a'o ++ Y _�. 4•1 e{ 'V 4.0'O rf:O O {A o K....4. o 'n - ) f— o j-qtr 'N �" �` 1tr °2 2 0 raa U O '� '� Y _a €,�" ,nO uj 4 O O O RN CO a\'n. y U--> c o % pit E Y f January 30, 2007 c. "`" Page 17 E . SECTION F cl Traffic Impacts Level of Service Capacity Analyses A significant methodology for determining traffic impacts is to examine the Levels of Service at the individual intersections and access points that will be directly impacted by a development. To assess the traffic impacts of the Liberty Property mixed-use development, intersection Level of Service analyses have been conducted at intersections 61 in the vicinity of the site. Intersection capacities have been analyzed in accordance with the requirements of the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM), using the methodology outlined in "Signalized and Unsignalized Intersection Capacities". The concept of Level of Service (LOS) is used as a basis for computing combinations of roadway operating conditions. By definition, six different Levels of Service are used (A, B, C, D, E, and F) with "A" being a free-flow condition and "E" representing the "capacity" of a given inter- section or traffic movement. Traffic volumes used in the analyses include those from fy; Figures 2, 3, 4, 9, and 10. The lane geometry and traffic controls used in the analyses are shown in Figures 2, 11, and 12 for Existing and Years 2010 and 2030, respectively. The results of these capacity analyses are found in Appendix C and are summarized in Table 2. • SH 66/WCR 5: The critical approach at this existing north/south Stop controlled intersection currently operates at capacity during the PM peak-hour. As background traffic volumes increase, the critical approach is expected to operate at or above capacity(LOS"E"and"F") during both morning and evening peak-hours by Year 2010. With the addition of site-generated traffic, the critical approach is expected to operate at a poor Level of Service(LOS "F") during both morning and evening peak-hours by Year 2010. However, traffic volumes at this intersection are expected to be sufficient to warrant a traffic signal by the Year 2010 with the addition of site generated traffic. As a signalized intersection, all approaches are expected to operate at an acceptable Level of Service (LOS "D" or better) through Year 2030 with or without site- generated af, traffic. WCR 32/WCR 5: The critical approach at this east/west Stop controlled inter- section is expected to operate at a good Level of Service (LOS "C" or better) through the Year 2030 with or without the addition of site-generated traffic. Liberty Property (LSC#070080) January 30, 2007 LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc. Page 18 r • WCR 5/Site Access: The critical approach at this proposed westbound Stop controlled site access intersection is expected to operate at a good Level of Service (LOS "C" or better) during both morning and evening peak-hours through the Year 2030. • WCR 32/West Site Access: The critical approach at this proposed northbound Stop controlled site access intersection is expected to operate at a very good Level of Service (LOS "B" or better) during both morning and evening peak- hours through the Year 2030. • WCR 32/East Site Access: The critical approach at this proposed northbound Stop controlled site access intersection is expected to operate at an excellent Level of Service (LOS"A") during both morning and evening peak-hours through the Year 2030. Average Daily Traffic Impacts Figure 13 shows the projected Year 2030 weekday project-generated traffic and the projected Year 2030 weekday total traffic as well as the Level of Service "C" capacity of the study area roadways. On SH 66, project-generated traffic is expected to account for approximately five percent of the total 2030 traffic; on WCR 5, south of the proposed site, project-generated traffic is expected to account for approximately 24 percent of the total Year 2030 traffic; and on WCR 32, project-generated traffic is expected to account for about three percent of total Year 2030 traffic east of the site and approximately 30 percent of total Year 2030 traffic adjacent to the site. • Liberty Property (LSC it 070080) January 30, 2007 LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc. Page 19 i N o co N t F n ao (jf 'ti+ o Pi 17 c O U n� T� n e V r \ _ V >- _U T Sz-r z o. ft \ O \ z 1 Oct Li I N >. I CZ CD I / cu I U i \ I L um 1 N \ K N f't '1:>._.,Dpi U H — ssa�— Ch C'-s I r _ Li saJM :I,:,. 7-11.7/1-/ :71_ .4) ti C CF' C UI Cn u to 9 a 0 o e H N p II II Ig z R Li.] January 30, 2007 Page 20 '.i ti., e� W a t. °a" U '-I , ___._.____ -.._m____„ .v� , �� SZ-I \ (n L w Nl' \ O � \ M C 1 Oct d I N I N N iii O M / ^` u I U I LNJM A;= \ si C I----) \ r fir} I I K L. S bJM ---<13- — ks::\N>, 71ft 19 U C a Cu a N 1 a 2 O S F- in- Y o II II P cl-, z Lu LLL J ; January 30, 2007 a.Y Page 21 \ /p so - ~ � mil |en 21 / _ N in e , _ « co Clii El » > •< , , , , , = : o = § � : , « / o « \ « « % . « « ; & > 3 � II III = = : oo § o = „ 3 I ii Ilk » , _ S2 2 ; ) < , ' ' II co co << ; III[ , , , , , , , ) / ! « < _ : C0C0 « _ < « co ) , N It » / / � « < � � / = = oe , < _ « \ _ < c . « _ < N- in s # 9 : co : : = = eu = ; « « « /R m , , ,T. , , , , , , ] {) ( § , in f � « � ] o >- .0 \ � oa. u .. 10 5 > < « « = o ] = = eon ; « « < m , , , , , , , , , E - CO tt co m \ § I [ -6 cc co ci « ` � - - 2 , , , , , , y it _ ; 4 � < < WO § « « < « & , , , , , , , , , { 07 § , , CO O 15 e ® f & _ t ° - 3 ° ! G - - ® * � ; l7 « < : o / , , lilt « < « « ; iii , ii , ii o o o E e o u 0 L ® ` ° ° E Ci / \ ) ci ! i - - ® ` _ _ (\ ie7i to co a § m ( 8 ` ® P. � § / ® f( \ \ \ \ {\\ & {{}}\ \ k2sff \ flf } \\\ \ \\\ \\ t 2 , } ; s « [ « - « t { { Not 5r, @ ! « z \ tt ] + tff MO l : 3z * a 2 : « ! 2 _ _ m : f « : : ; IwA 2 « > 6 } 2kd � th (7 6 f6 6 \ \ / 0 z -• \ January 30, 200 7 © Page 22 F.d cu cip s 112 bp `j o E•'i N 7 o 0o rid Po „, c) U o S N I S Z Is. .. I =.a O I 0 I O. / a N r M ai C4 r < K.. isi L21JM F 0 l ..., 0 Etc O O. O O O 00 +"F O O yc p o O O a 0 - _ 1 _ _ _ _ .t 0 o S.S ND I N U 3 0 \IL, \\ W r. F- o 0 0 �� J U u 0 o a ti K7 S JM \ � � IiOO OOO oOO MOin OnO,,,N O R M O t O N III r. N .- v1 t 1 Z o W in C re) k - W n J • January 30, 2007 ° Page 23 4,. SECTION G Recommendations Access Recommendations Figures 11 and 12 show the recommended Year 2010 and Year 2030 traffic control and lane geometry at the major intersections serving the Liberty Property mixed-use develop- ment. Shown below is a summary of the recommended roadway improvements for the site access, the WCR 5/WCR 32 and SH 66/WCR 5 intersections, and their required is lengths. These recommendations are based on Year 2030 total traffic volumes shown in ) Figure 10 and the Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT) State Highway Access Code, March 2002, assuming that WCR 5 is classified as major collector roadway (NR-C) with a 35 mph speed limit and SH 66 is a Non Rural Arterial (NR-A) with a posted speed of 60 mph. • Year 2010 • Signalization of the SH 66/WCR 5 intersection (the Liberty Property develop- ment should only be responsible for its proportionate share of the cost of construction of this traffic signal); • WCR 5/Site Access- an exclusive northbound right-turn deceleration lane with a length of 220 feet which includes a 120-foot taper length; • WCR 5/WCR 32 - an exclusive northbound right-turn deceleration lane with a length of 210 feet which includes a 120-foot taper length; • SH 66/WCR 5 - an exclusive westbound right-turn deceleration lane with a length of 700 feet which includes a 300-foot taper length and an exclusive east- bound left-turn deceleration lane with a length of 965 feet which includes a 300-foot taper length. There is an existing eastbound left-turn lane which may be sufficient to accommodate the short term traffic until SH 66 is widened to four lanes. In addition, the following regional improvements are expected to be constructed by others by the Year 2030: • SH 66 - Widen to four-lane roadway (two lanes in each direction); • WCR 5/WCR 32 - an exclusive southbound left-turn lane; • SH 66/WCR 5 - exclusive southbound left-turn and right-turn and northbound left-turnon deceleration lanes on WCR 5 and exclusive eastbound right-turn and westbound left-turn deceleration lanes on SH 66. • Liberty Property (LSC#070080) January 30, 2007 LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc. Page 24 . 11 SECTION H Conclusions Based upon the foregoing analysis, the following conclusions may be made regarding the Liberty Property development: t• 1. The Liberty Property mixed-use development is planned for a parcel of land located to the southeast of the intersection of Weld County Road (WCR) 32 and WCR 5 in Weld County, Colorado. The 149-acre site is proposed to contain about 175 single-family dwelling units and a 40,000 square-foot health/fitness center. 2. The development will be served by a single full movement access on WCR 5 and two full movement access points on WCR 32. 3. The following distribution is expected for the site generated traffic: To/From 2010 2030 West SH 66 50% 42% East SH 66 44% 32% North WCR 5 3% 13% South WCR 5 1% 10% West WCR 32 1% 1% e.; East WCR 32 1% 2% 4. Traffic control and roadway geometry assumed for Years 2010 and 2030 are illustrated in Figures 11 and 12. Assuming the improvements shown on these figures, all intersections are expected to operate acceptably through the Year 2030. 5. Shown below is a summary of the recommended roadway improvements for the site access,WCR 5/WCR 32 and SH 66/WCR 5 intersections and their required lengths. • Signalization of the SH 66/WCR 5 intersection (the Liberty Property development should only be responsible for its proportionate share of the cost of construction of this traffic signal); • WCR 5/Site Access- an exclusive northbound right-turn deceleration lane with a length of 220 feet which includes a 120-foot taper length; • WCR 5/WCR 32 - an exclusive northbound right-turn deceleration lane with a length of 210 feet which includes a 120-foot taper length; • SH 66/WCR 5 - an exclusive westbound right-turn deceleration lane with a length of 700 feet which includes a 300-foot taper length and an exclusive eastbound left-turn deceleration lane with a length of 965 feet which includes a 300-foot taper length. There is an existing eastbound Liberty Property(LSC#070080) Jarman/30, 2007 LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc. Page 25 1,11 left-turn lane which may be sufficient to accommodate the short term traffic until SH 66 is widened to four lanes. 6. In addition, the following regional improvements are expected to be constructed by others by the Year 2030: f•:. • SH 66 - Widen to four-lane roadway (two lanes in each direction); • WCR 5/WCR 32 - an exclusive southbound left-turn lane; SH 66/WCR 5 - exclusive southbound left-turn and right-turn and north- bound left-turnon deceleration lanes on WCR 5 and exclusive eastbound right-turn and westbound left-turn deceleration lanes on SH 66. fAa 7. Traffic associated with the construction of the Liberty Property mixed-use development can be safely accommodated by the adjacent roadway network flwith the recommendations contained in this report. r-4 4"i Yn e.' t. : r.: t1�F- I� L. • Liberty Property (LSC#070080) January 30, 2007 LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc. Page 26 APPENDIX A Existing Traffic M, Counter Measures .,i`ce Code : 4 PAGE: 1 N/S STREET: WELD CO RD S FILE: WCRSSH66 / STREET: SR-66 Movements by: Vehicles DATE: 11/16/05 mi"> From North From East From South From West Vehicle e a RT THRD LT RT THRU LT RT THRU LT RT TURD LT Total 6:1 12 1 0 0 156 1 0 0 0 2 122 2 296 6: 5 13 1 0 2 171 0 1 0 2 2 162 4 358 ..R ,OTAL 25 2 0 2 327 1 1 0 2 4 284 6 654 7, 0 AM 8 0 0 0 154 1 1 0 0 1 142 4 311 7: 'S 13 0 1 0 203 0 4 0 2 2 147 14 386 7:30 16 0 2 0 175 2 1 2 0 1 166 5 310 7r'5 19 0 2 1 196 0 0 0 1 0 161 4 384 Ri_,OTAL 56 0 5 1 728 3 6 2 3 4 616 27 1451 8100 AM 12 0 0 0 162 1 1 0 0 0 125 4 305 8' 5 9 0 0 0 143 0 1 0 0 1 124 6 284 Break 4 0 PM 10 0 0 1 148 0 0 1 2 0 175 5 342 4:15 5 1 1 0 154 3 4 0 2 2 176 7 355 4''0 9 1 2 0 161 2 0 0 3 3 126 20 327 4, 5 8 0 1 1 190 0 0 1 1 0 137 9 348 al iOTAL 32 2 4 2 653 5 4 2 8 5 614 41 1372 5..0 PM 2 0 0 1 210 3 0 0 0 0 177 11 404 5. S 15 2 1 2 193 0 1 1 1 1 202 19 438 5:30 9 3 4 2 182 0 0 0 0 1 159 17 377 S;:'5 14 2 0 4 156 1 1 0 1 0 168 19 366 3'! .0TAL 40 7 5 9 741 4 2 1 2 2 106 66 1585 DAY TOTAL 174 11 14 14 2754 14 15 5 15 16 2469 150 5651 �., Counter Measures Slid Code : 4 PAGE: 1 NfSSTREET: WELD CO RD 5 FILE: WCRSSH66 E/`.`STREET: SH-66 Movements by: Vehicles DATE: 11/16/05 PEAK PERIOD ANALYSIS FOR THE PERIOD: 6:30 AM - 8:30 AM DIRECTION START PEAK HR VOLUMES .... PERCENTS .,. FROM PEAK HOUR FACTOR Right Thru Left Total Right Thru Left North 1:15 AM 0.11 60 0 5 65 92 0 8 East 7:15 AM 0.91 1 136 3 740 0 99 0 South 6:45 AM 0.54 1 2 4 13 54 15 31 West 6:45 AM 0.94 6. 617 27 650 1 95 4 :i 1 Entire Intersection North 7:00 AM 0.73 56 0 5 61 92 0 8 `.a East 0.90 1 728 3 732 0 99 0 South 0.46 6 2 3 11 55 18 27 West 0.94 4 616 27 647 1 95 4 WELD CO RD 5 N W—I--E S 56 0 5 :; T87'i:;: 61 1 :::::: r >:i 511-66 732 728 27 1 L 3 616 647 SEI-66 62 `5: 4 J 11 3 2 6 WELD CO RD 5 Counter Measures i &Code : 4 PAGE: 1 N/S,STREET: WELD CO RD S FILE: WCRSSH66 /j. :STREET: SH-66 t• Movements by: Vehicles DATE: 11/16/05 PEAK PERIOD ANALYSIS FOR THE PERIOD: 4:00 PM - 6:00 PM DIRECTION START PEAK MR VOLUMES .... PERCENTS ... FROM PEAK HOUR FACTOR Right Thru Left Total Right Thru Left North 5:00 PM 0.72 40 7 5 52 77 13 10 • East 4:45 PM 0.92 6 775 3 784 1 99 0 South 4:00 PM 0.58 4 2 8 14 29 14 57 West 5:00 PM 0.87 2 706 66 774 0 91 9 1.1 Entire Intersection North 5:00 PM 0.72 40 7 5 52 77 13 10 r East 0.88 9 741 4 754 1 98 1 South 0.42 2 1 2 5 40 20 40 West 0.87 2 706 66 774 0 91 9 Zff WELD CO RD 5 N W— HE S Vic' :i:;i:7c6:a;;: cc. 40 7 5 c _; :; 52 9 _. :.::.:;:7:81:..;:;: r :S:•.'• SH-66 754 741 17. LI 66 L 4 P J 706 774 SH-66 : > ::'::.•':713:.::;:: J 2 5 F 2 1 2 :::<13'S:: E WELD CO RD 5 k;fi Counter Measures Ate Code : 2 PAGE: 1 91S STREET: CR-5 FILE: ecr5cr32 f : ;TREET: CR-32 Movements by: Vehicles DATE: 11/16/05 "i, From North From East From South From Vest Vehicle eu 1 ET THRO LT RT TURD LT RT TURD LT RT TURD LT Total 6.10 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 14 6 5 0 21 1 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 1 0 28 _R LOTAL 0 34 1 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 1 0 42 7 0 AN 0 13 1 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 1 1 22 7` 5 0 15 1 0 0 0 1 22 0 0 0 0 39 7:30 0 23 0 0 1 1 0 11 1 1 1 0 39 1 '5 0 18 1 0 1 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 23 R,: DTAL 0 69 3 0 2 1 1 41 1 2 2 1 123 8;00 AM 0 8 1 1 1 1 0 4 0 0 0 0 16 3 >5 0 7 1 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 13 Break 1 —1 PM 1 6 2 0 0 0 2 15 0 0 0 1 27 4:15 0 5 1 1 0 0 0 15 0 0 0 0 22 1.10 0 10 1 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 22 1. 5 0 9 2 0 0 1 0 8 1 0 1 0 22 .1'IOTAL 1 30 6 1 0 1 2 49 1 0 1 1 93 5.0 PM 0 10 0 0 1 0 1 13 1 1 0 0 27 56:5 0 9 0 0 0 0 2 11 0 0 0 0 22 5:30 0 7 1 1 0 0 0 13 1 0 0 0 23 5 :5 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 7 1 0 0 0 24 1. 3TAL 0 42 1 1 1 0 3 44 3 1 0 0 96 AV TOTAL 1 190 13 3 4 3 6 149 5 3 4 2 383 •`- Counter Measures site Code : 2 PAGE: 1 NiS STREET: CR-S FILE: xcrSct32 1.-. STREET: CR-32 Movements by: Vehicles DATE: 11/16/05 PEAK PERIOD ANALYSIS FOR THE PERIOD: 1:00 AM - 8:00 AM DIRECTION START PEAK HR VOLUMES .... PERCENTS ... FROM PEAK HOUR FACTOR Right Thru Left Total Right Thru Left North 7:00 AM 0,78 0 69 3 72 0 96 4 East 7:00 AM 0.38 0 2 1 3 0 61 33 South 7:00 AM 0.47 1 41 1 43 2 95 2 Nest 7:00 AM 0.63 2 2 1 5 40 40 20 • t„ Entire Intersection {v;f North 7:00 AM 0.78 0 69 3 72 0 96 4 East 0.38 0 2 1 3 0 67 33 South 0.47 1 41 1 43 2 95 2 Nest 0.63 2 2 1 5 40 40 20 CR-5 N ti85;Y:S: E 5 . ::4 z:::'': :.: 0 69 3 :::.:::::.::::.::::.:::::::::::::i::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: 3 .:::::: . .. . . r :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :.:::::: ::> CR-32 3 2 1 L 1 ....:i.e.......;:.E 2 5 CR-32 ie 2 r 43 1 41 1 ;r:S; 2't :i:''`S:S CR-5 Counter Measures ji.J Code : 2 PAGE: 1 N/S STREET: CR-5 FILE: vcr5cr32 1'`.''STREET: CR-32 Movements by: Vehicles DATE: 11/16/05 r._ PEAK PERIOD ANALYSIS FOR THE PERIOD: 4:00 PM - 6:00 PM DIRECTION START PEAK HR VOLUMES .... PERCENTS ... FROM PEAK HOUR FACTOR Right Thru Left Total Right Thru Left North 5:00 PM 0.67 0 42 1 43 0 98 2 East 4:15 PM 0.75 1 1 1 3 33 33 33 South 4:00 PM 0.76 2 49 1 52 4 94 2 West 4:00 PM 0.50 0 1 1 2 0 50 50 €a Entire Intersection North 5:00 PM 0.67 0 42 1 43 0 98 2 ri East 0.50 1 1 0 2 50 50 0 South 0.83 3 44 3 50 6 88 6 Nest 0.25 1 0 0 1 %100 0 0 2L ME C R—5 N S 4.'' '.'.'...4 C:•:C:: a • 0 42 1 J ' 43 1 k . §:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: r , , xf:::::::::K: S CR-32 2 1 L0 0 c,., f. ,. . :::::..0 0 1 CR-32 :ik 1 i 50 3r ;8t:a:;`.:it :`?;>' 3 4 4 3 t CR-5 Counter Measures *** Weekly Summary for week of November 13, 2005 *** Page 3 Data File : M1105002 . PRN ^ ' ttion : 000000111517 Lane(s ) : 1 cantification : 000000111517 Direction : Northbound City/Town County : WELD Location : CR-5 8/0 CR-32 c**************************************************************************** 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Wkday Daily Time Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Avg. Avg. 00 2 2 1 02 :00 0 0 0 IF- 00 1 1 1 00 1 1 1 ub' 00 2 2 1 06.: 00 7 7 5 3H00 19 19 14 ..&: 00 32 • 32 23 09:00 32 32 23 f "'00 14 14 10 : 00 13 13 9 12 : 00 33 33 24 .7:00 22 22 16 ` :00 27 27 19 X3:00 39 39 28 16: 00 46 46 33 :a: 00 53 53 38 C.:00 50 50 36 19:00 45 45 32 "r' :00 35 35 25 : 00 32 32 23 2200 20 20 14 23:00 7 7 5 :00 1 1 1 Totals 533 533 381 % Avg Wkday 100. 0 Q.: Ivg Day 140.0 nF Peak Hr 12 :00 AM Count 33 _L Peak Hr 17 :00 PM Count 53 Counter Measures *** Weekly Summary for week of November 13, 2005 *** Page 4 a` ***************************************************************************** Data File : M1105002 .PRN S`- ation : 000000111517 Lane(s) : 2 C entification : 000000111517 Direction : Southbound City/Town County : WELD Lrcation : CR-5 S/O CR-32 ***************************************************************************** 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Wkday Daily Time Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Avg. Avg. ). :00 1 1 1 02 : 00 0 0 0 x' : 00 3 3 2 7~ :;: 00 1 1 1 J5 :00 7 7 5 06: 00 16 16 11 T• : 00 40 40 29 11: 00 61 61 44 09 : 00 48 48 34 1' 00 26 26 19 1 00 19 19 14 12 : 00 28 28 20 1' : 00 34 34 24 L. : 00 27 27 19 11: 00 30 30 21 16:00 36 36 26 00 36 36 26 L : 00 46 46 33 19 : 00 21 21 15 1" : 00 13 13 9 ! :00 8 8 6 22 : 00 10 10 7 21.: 00 4 4 3 : 00 1 1 1 Totals 516 516 369 ***************************************************************************** % Avg Wkday 100.0 `9i. Avg Day 140.0 Am Peak Hr 08 :00 AM Count 61 ''__ Peak Hr 18 : 00 PM Count 46 I . Counter Measures *** Weekly Summary for week of November 13, 2005 *** Page 1 Data File : M1105001 .PRN i' ltion : 000000111519 Lane(s ) : 1 ctntification : 000000111519 Direction : Eastbound City/Town County : WELD recation : CR-32 E/O CR-5 :**************************************************************************** 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Wkday Daily Time Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Avg. Avg. < ' 00 0 0 0 02:00 0 0 0 ' ,:00 0 0 0 p;s00 0 0 0 05 :00 0 0 0 n§:00 0 0 0 00 2 2 1 ., :00 7 7 5 09 :00 6 6 4 C'00 0 0 0 :00 1 1 1 12:00 6 6 4 ":00 3 3 2 00 6 6 4 i500 5 5 4 1600 5 5 4 a 00 8 8 6 _x:00 3 3 2 19 : 00 0 0 0 - 00 1 1 1 00 1 1 1 22:00 1 1 1 7? •00 0 0 0 `:00 0 0 0 Totals 55 55 39 % Avg Wkday 100. 0 " v\vg Day 140 .0 AM Peak Hr 08 : 00 AM Count 7 . Peak Hr 17 : 00 PM Count 8 Counter Measures *** Weekly Summary for week of November 13, 2005 *** Page 2 Data File : M1105001 . PRN -.'ition : 000000111519 Lane(s) : 2 i ?ntification : 000000111519 Direction : Westbound City/Town County : WELD T.rcation : CR-32 E/0 CR-5 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Wkday Daily Time Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Avg. Avg. :00 0 0 0 02 :00 0 0 0 'F :00 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 00: 0500 1 1 1 000 1 1 1 P 00 1 1 1 ..c :00 3 3 2 09 :00 7 7 5 :00 1 1 1 : 00 5 5 4 12 :00 4 4 3 '' : 00 2 2 1 :00 6 6 4 so : 00 4 4 3 16:00 8 8 6 00 2 2 1 00 3 3 2 19 :00 0 0 0 - : 00 0 0 0 :00 0 0 0 22:00 0 0 0 9'x :00 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 Totals 48 48 34 ***************************************************************************** % Avg Wkday 100.0 = Avg Day 140 .0 AM Peak Hr 09 :00 AM Count 7 _ Peak Hr 16 : 00 PM Count 8 ***************************************************************************** • ii, COMA MOUS 12-12-2004 f11 lastly Salary for leek Of febnary 8, 2004 'to 09:23 tg 2 • --Pile: 10204001.P11 Sta: 020957000000 Id: 020957000000 Could: 01 • :ity/Tova: IIID Comity: I16D ` ;ocatioe: 8I-66 1/0 CS-1 Point: bit inslc 2-1 lirectioe: Eat 7 9 10 11 12 13 14 Daily Ikday heed 6 Tide Sae Doe Tee led The [xi Sat Avg. Avg. lrg. 11:00 - - 29 - - - - 29 29 12:00 _ - 10 _ 19 19 13:00 10 10 10 14:00 - - 11 - - - - 17 17 7115:00 68 61 ::11:40 - - 201 - - - - 201 287 11:00 - - 511 - - - - 511 517 ,..11:00 - - 627 - - - - 627 621 x: 19:00 - - 501 - - - - 501 501 t .10:00 - - 376 - - - - 376 316 11:00 - - 361 - - - - 367 367 419 419 x - -: 12:00 - - 419 - - 414 414 if, 13:00 - - 414 - - - - 439 414 14:00 - - 439 - - - - 439 472 ^::: 15:00 - - 472 - - - - 582 472 ''., 16:00 - - 582 - - - - 647 541 17:00 - - 641 - - - - 683 683 .. 11:00 - - 683 - - - - 465 465 19:00 - - 465 - - - - 465 275 ' 20:00 - - 275 - - - 21:00 - - 201 - - - - 201 I07 r 22:00 - - 111 - - - - 171 117 `�. 23:00 - - 103 - - - 103 10353 53 24:00 - - 53 - - - i . Totals - - 1154 - - - - 7754 1151 0 0 ltg Itday - - 100.0 - - - - 0 Avg Day - - 100.0 - - - - U1 Peat It Some Ion 08:00 lose loos Ion Iola . U! Tout - - 627 - - - - PI Peat Ir lone lone 11:00 tone lone lone Ione PI Coast - - 683 - - - - i F , Cousin Insults . 12-12-2004 ata hotly Sultry for leek Of Pantry 1, 2004 1ee 09:13 Pg 1 ,-,tila: 10204001.111 Its: 020957000000 Id: 020957000000 Could: 01 ` ':lty/Pon: IUD County: SILO Acstlot: 1I-66 110 CI-7 Porut: Mr ;wain: 1-1 lirection: hit 8 9 10 11 11 13 14 Daily Bkday Stead Time Su Ion he Bed tko Fri Sat lag• Avg. Avg. 31:00 - - 36 - - - - 36 36 12:00 - - 21 - - - - 17 27 =13:00 - - 14 - - - - 14 14 34:00 - - 24 - - - - I4 24 "':05:00 - • 69 - - - - 69 69 `:',06:00 - - 124 - - - - 124 124 37:00 - - 491 - - - - 491 491 31:00 - - 719 - - - - 719 119 09:00 - - 511 - - - - 571 571 "10:00 - - 424 - - - - 424 424 11:00 - - 390 - - - - 390 390 ":'12:00 - - 386 - - - - 306 316 13:00 - - 425 - - - - 425 425 14:00 - - 411 - - - - 411 411 ': 15:00 - - 426 - - - - 426 426 16:90 - - 557 - - - - 557 557 , 11:00 - - 510 - - - - 578 570 ,.., 11:00 - 662 - - - - 662 662 19:00 - - 462 - - - - 462 462 `x'' 10:00 - - 229 - - - - 229 229 21:00 - - 107 - - - - 187 101 r 11:00 • - 164 - - - - 164 164 L 23:00 - - 112 - - - - 112 112 24:00 - - 66 - - - - 66 66 Tattle - - 1554 - - - - 7554 7554 0 4 lag Skday - - 100.0 - - - - A . 01vg Day - - 100.0 - - - - di Peak It None lone 00:00 lone loan lone lone s U Coat - - 719 - - - - PI Peak Ir Ione Ione 18:00 lona loon Ione lone PS Coat - - 662 - - - - Counter Measures i'r- Code : 10 PAGE: 1 N/S STREET: CR-1 • FILE: WCR1SR66 -I".."-STREET: SR-66 Movements by: Vehicles DATE: 2/23/06 yin From North From East From South From West Vehicle n RT TRH LT RT TRH LT RT THU LT RT THU LT Total 6:30 28 1 2 0 132 0 1 0 2 0 123 2 291 5''5 37 1 3 0 111 1 0 0 0 0 163 5 321 I OTAL 65 2 5 0 243 1 1 0 2 0 286 7 612 7 '0 AM 39 0 4 1 105 0 0 0 1 1 157 9 317 5 38 2 1 1 153 1 1 1 0 0 178 6 382 7:30 43 0 2 4 148 0 2 2 0 0 168 11 380 7.:45 26 0 8 0 162 0 0 1 1 1 145 6 350 ,OTAL 146 2 15 6 568 1 3 4 2 2 648 32 1429 S::00 AM 16 2 2 2 120 0 2 2 0 0 120 1 213 ,T5 15 0 2 2 121 0 3 1 1 0 115 12 272 Break I. 0 PM 10 2 6 0 149 1 2 2 0 1 162 29 364 4:15 16 0 2 6 145 2 0 2 0 2 113 21 309 4:30 26 1 S 2 155 0 3 1 0 1 145 31 370 I .5 18 0 2 7 175 1 2 2 1 6 127 26 367 .1'TOTAL 70 3 15 15 624 4 7 7 1 10 547 107 1410 "0 PM 8 2 S 2 169 1 0 2 1 1 145 19 355 S'1S 17 0 4 5 195 3 2 2 0 1 158 44 431 5:30 26 1 0 2 174 0 0 2 1 1 132 41 380 c s 12 0 4 1 161 1 1 2 0 0 153 29 364 r: OTAL 63 3 13 10 699 5 3 8 2 3 588 133 1530 DAT TOTAL 375 12 52 35 2375 11 19 22 8 15 2304 298 5526 ". Counter Measures i', Code : 10 PAGE: 1 N/S STREET: CR-7 FILE: NCR1SH66 -/. STREET: SR-66 Movements by: Vehicles DATE: 2/23/06 PEAK PERIOD ANALYSIS FOR THE PERIOD: 6:30 AM - 8:30 AM DIRECTION START PEAK HR VOLUMES .... PERCENTS ... FROM PEAK HOUR FACTOR Right Thru Left Total Right Thru Left North 6:45 AM 0.94 151 3 10 170 92 2 6 East 7:15 AM 0.91 1 583 1 591 1 99 0 South 7:30 AM 0.75 7 6 2 15 47 40 13 Nest 6:45 AM 0.95 1 666 31 698 0 95 4 I_' Entire Intersection North 7:00 AM 0.91 146 2 15 163 90 1 9 F -' East 0.89 6 568 1 515 1 99 0 South 0.56 3 4 2 9 33 44 22 Nest 0.93 2 648 32 682 0 95 5 CR-7 N W—{—E S : :;42::::: 146 2 15 L _ 163 6 - :::.x.:.::::::::::::::•::::,/:::::::÷:c.:.:.Fi 716 ::::::: r SH-66 575 568 • 32 1 L 1 648 682 SH-66 2 9 4 3 J; r5:.? 2 CR-7 Counter Measures Code : 10 PAGE: 1 N/S STREET: CR-7 FILE: WCR1SH66 1/7-STREET: SR-66 Movements by: Vehicles DATE: 2/23/06 PEAK PERIOD ANALYSIS FOR THE PERIOD: 4:00 PM - 6:00 PM DIRECTION START PEAK HR VOLUMES .... PERCENTS ... FROM PEAK HOUR FACTOR Right Thru Left Total Right Thru Left North 4:00 PM 0.69 70 3 15 88 80 3 17 East 4:45 PM 0.90 16 713 5 734 2 97 1 South 4:30 PM 0.80 7 7 2 16 44 44 12 West 5:00 PM 0.89 3 588 133 724 0 81 18 Entire Intersection North 4:45 PM 0.77 69 3 11 83 83 4 13 East 0.90 16 713 5 734 2 97 1 South 0.75 4 8 3 15 27 53 20 West 0.86 9 562 130 101 1 80 19 CR-7 N W—f—E S 69 3 11 785 c?'t L :,:::: 16 „„„„,:,:„„„ 83 SH-66 734 713 fZU 130 L 5 562 701 SH-66 Et 577 J 9 15 • 3 8 4 17 ' CR-7 APPENDIX B Internal Capture Summary F a L 5 E 0 m 15272 mo mo a E 'R Tic a) ac 'xi c �' w w W W t • w w w n' cur a at w a m o a U e co co r C O O O O I O O O O y N N E E a_ c a_ W Z W Z 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m E a C a Z ► a) Z C = G O O N aN N Of O> c0 e0 O O O Q O O O H r or N o H Z o Fes- Z 0 0 0 m L. N N w fn N .1"7-, �a e O I O J (7) t p N e W W w W we w F O • • co • O N N O O' e. 0 S 0 0 0 x C COJ W I 0 0 0 ea. - q 0 e a . N / _ o co 0 a _• : _ z 0 d e e a L my i E a) a 22 z N _, _ [1 0 O N N 00 d O W O O N co O N O D O) N r- co a) O a) U on co r` on ca w Sys mm E W 6 0 0 0 0 0 - m `u• za e e e e co d W 0J ea N N ON D y "' az _ — _ _ _ _ _ •. J ~ W • $ � O w LU N 0 0 w d 0g = .- O m O. ��JJ H €., a m N / o e ' N COet N to N O [.;: a -' o el o a y o p O co co 0 r` O N N -en 0 ca 0 Of .0 -0 r 7. 0 0 0 0 03 o m a) m r. 0 0 co co 9 co W ° m N E CL) c0 r- O C 0 0 C = C N W m W m O u a v m m Id m v m d W o S° v a) 0 e E o w t- E N 0 o F- m m ) m o ''m (.2 (7 .c C N _ = W O. N ✓ _ c •cF C a m ~ W a a)▪ V V coff NN a) to 0wF v) CC O c0 c0 c0 O ' O V V COu0 O 2 f' ) e. o I- co o F O E- a L. E 0 a) • 0 w m +`- N 0 J cn `a) 'K To e N I 0)j - CO p1 '% at e a h N- LL T W W F N w w l- c_ n co m O ° F o O w m N N c e a N U U co co) N :C a)Y 7 cu y N — ...... Z H E c m o # m o m m II O o To (D a) mm m II `mm ui • OH WW .). � UW WW1 �wW 0 APPENDIX C Intersection Level of Service Analysis F-, HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Existing AM Peak (Nov 2005) 1: WCR 32 & WCR 5 1/22/2007 a c 4\ t r- `- d Movement EBL EST' EBR WBL WET WBR ? NBL NBT NBR SBL_ SBT SBF₹ Lane Configurations 4 4 4+ 4+ Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% Volume(veh/h) 1 2 2 1 2 0 1 41 1 3 69 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92_ 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate (vph) 1 2 2 1 2 0 1 45 1 3 75 0 t Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) • Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage yi Right turn flare (veh) La Median type None None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) pX, platoon unblocked vC, conflicting volume 130 129 75 132 129 45 75 46 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 130 129 75 132 129 45 75 46 tC, single(s) 7.1 6.5 6.2 ' 7.1 6.5 6.2 ; 4.1 4.1 tC, 2 stage (s) tE(s) ; 35 4.0 33 3.5 4.0 3.3' 2,2 2.2 ' p0 queue free % 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 cM capacity(veh/h) 839 759 986 - 835 760 1025 , 1524 1562 0irecfibn„Cane# EB 1 WB'1' _ NB 1 SB,1 , Volume Total 5 =.3 47 78 Volume Left 1 1 1 3 Volume Right 2 0 1 0 cSH 854 783 1524 1562 Volume to Capacity 0.01 0.00 0.00 :'A 00 6 Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 0 0 0 Control Delay(s) 9.2r 9.6 0.2 0.3 Lane LOS A A A A Approach Delay(s) 9.2 9.6 0.2, 0.3 Approach LOS A A Intersection;Sumriary' Average Delay 0,9 Intersection Capacity Utilization 15.1%` ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 Liberty Property (LSC#051470) Existing AM Peak (Nov 2005) Ben Waldman Page 1 LSC, Inc. c } HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Existing AM Peak (Nov 2005) 2: SH 66 & WCR 5 1/22/2007 • Movement EBL EST ,EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR `SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations ' ' fi 4 4. Sign Control Free Free Stop Stop • Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% Volume (veh/h) 27 616 4 3 728 1 3 2 6 5 0 56 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate (vph) 29 670 4 3 791 1 3 2 7 5 0 61 • Pedestrians t Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (fUs) rPercent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) u Median type None None Median storage veh) ri Upstream signal (ft) pX, platoon unblocked vC, conflicting volume 792 674 1589 1529 672 1534 1531 792 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 792 674 1589 1529 672 1534 1531 792 • tC, single (s) 4.1 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 tC, 2 stage (s) tF(s) ' 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 p0 queue free % 96 100 95 98 99 94 100 84 cM capacity (veh/h) 828 917 71 113 456 90 112 389 . Direction;Lane'# EE 11, ;EB 2, WB.1 'WE.I2 NB 1'r SB 1';' . , • Volume Total 29 674 3 792 12 66 Volume Left 29 0 3 0 3 5 Volume Right ' 0 4 0 1 7 61 cSH 828 1700 917 1700 151 305 Volume to Capacity 0.04 0.40 0.00 0.47 0.08 0.22 - Queue Length 95th (ft) 3 0 0 0 6 20 Control'Delay(s) 9.5 0.0 8.9 ' 0.0 31.0 20.0 Lane LOS A A D C Approach Delay(s) 0.4 0.0 31.0 . '20.0 Approach LOS D C Interse'ctiort'Su`mmary Average Delay 1.3 Intersection Capacity Utilization 49.0% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 Liberty Property (LSC#051470) Existing AM Peak (Nov 2005) • Ben Waldman Page 2 LSC, Inc. 1 3 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Existing PM Peak (Nov 2005) 1: WCR 32 & WCR 5 1/22/2007 Movement EBL EBT EBR" !''WBL , VVBT, WBR`"'NBL "NBT NBR 5BL= SBT sek Lane Configurations 4, 4, 4, 4+ Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% Volume (veh/h) 0 0 1 0 1 1 3 44 3 1 42 - 0 • Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate (vph) 0 0 1 0 1 1 3 48 3 1 46 0 Pedestrians ) ' Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) pX, platoon unblocked vC, conflicting volume 105 105 46 105 104 49 46 51 • vC1, stage 1 conf vol • vC2, stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 105 105 46 105 104 49 46 51 f.:;. tC, single (s) 7.1 6:5 6:2 7.1 6.5 6.2' 4.1 4.1 tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s) 3.5 4.0 3.3 '. 35 40 3.3 2.2 2.2' p0 queue free % 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 cM capacity(veh/h) 871 782 1024 872 784 1019 1562` 1555 • Direction) Line#j: EB 1 „WB1 NB 1 '1SB 1 Volume Total 1 2 54 47 ': Volume Left 0 0 3 1 Volume Right ' 1 1 3 0 cSH 1024 886 1562 1555 Volume to Capacity 0.00 0.00 0:00 0.00 Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 0 0 0 Control Delay(s) 8.5 9.1 0.5 0.2` g•-, Lane LOS A A A A 1a Approach Delay(s) 8.5 9:1 0.5. 0.2. Approach LOS A A tfiterse"cfion Summary Average Delay 0 6 Intersection Capacity Utilization 14.0% ICU Level of Service A • Analysis Period (min) 15 I Liberty Property (LSC#051470) Existing PM Peak (Nov 2005) • Ben Waldman Page 1 LSC, Inc. HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Existing PM Peak (Nov 2005) 2: SH 66 & WCR 5 1/22/2007 • Movement` • `EBL EBT EBR `+WBL WbT"WBR`' 'NBL'''NBT NBR SBL SBT` 'SBA Lane Configurations 4+ 4. Sign Control Free Free Stop Stop Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% Volume (veh/h) 66 706 2 4 ' 741 9 2 _ 1 2 5 7 40 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate (vph) 72 767 2 4 805 10 2 1 2 5 8 43 Pedestrians p!, Lane Width(ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) pX, platoon unblocked vC, conflicting volume 815 770 1773 1736 768 1733 1732 810 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2,stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 815 770 1773 1736 768 1733 1732 810 • tC, single (s) 4:1- 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 ` 6.2 tC, 2 stage(s) • tF(s) 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 < 3.5 4.0 3.3 p0 queue free % 91 99 96 99 99 91 90 89 chit capacity(veh/h) 812 845 49 79 401 63 80 ' .380 F. - . A . ... DirectGti, Lane# 1 =EBi ; E62 VV 2, r • 'B2 , NB SB1a y Volume Total 72 770 4 815 5 57 Volume Left 72 0 4 0 2 5 Volume Right 0 2 0 10 2 43 cSH 812 1700 845 1700 86 191 Volume to Capacity 0:09 0.45 0.01 !'0.48 ' 0.06 0:30 Queue Length 95th (ft) 7 0 0 0 5 29 Control Delay(s) 9.9 0.0 9.3 0.0 49.7 31:6 r•.> Lane LOS A A E D Approach Delay(s) 0.8 0,0- 49.7 31.6 Approach LOS E D r. infefsectionSUfnmary ' ;_ ;-." ,°` Average Delay 1.6 Intersection Capacity Utilization ` 56.5% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 Liberty Property (LSC#051470) Existing PM Peak (Nov 2005) Ben Waldman Page 2 LSC, Inc. HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis • 1: WCR 32 & WCR 5 1/22/2007 fe &• 4\ t , 1 r Movement BBL EBT EBR :WBL WBT WBR ' NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 4+ 4+ 4, 4' Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free • Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% Volume(veh/h) 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 55 5 5 85 _ 5 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate (vph) 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 60 5 5 92 5 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) pX, platoon unblocked vC, conflicting volume 188 182 95 188 182 62 98 65 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 188 182 95 188 182 62 98 65 7 : tC, single (s) 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 4:1 4.1 tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s) 3.5 4.0 3.3 " 3.5 4:0 3:3 ` 2.2 2.2 p0 queue free % 99 99 99 99 99 99 100 100 cM capacity(veh/h) 760 707 962 760 ; 707 1002 1495 1537 QlMcfion;Lane# = EB 1 'WB�'I` NB•1 , SB 1 ' Volumes Total 16 16 71 103 Volume Left 5 5 5 5 Volume Right 5 5 5 ; 5 cSH 796 805 1495 1537 Volume to Capacity 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.00 Queue Length 95th (ft) 2 2 0 0 Control Delay(s) 9.6 9.6 0.6 - 0.4 ('; Lane LOS A A A A e_ Approach Delay(s) 9,6: 9.6 0.6 0.4 Approach LOS A A Intersection''Sumrriery Average Delay 1.9 Intersection Capacity Utilization 16.1% : ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 Liberty Property (LSC#051470) • 2010 AM Peak Bgrnd with improvements Page 1 LSC, Inc. rHCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2: SF-I 66 & WCR 5 1/22/2007 G : t I ,- t .v t t \* I Movement % EEL EBT EBB- WBL WBT WBR NBL NET 'NBR 'SBL SET SER Lane Configurations ►t tt r ' ft r vi it ' t r Sign Control Free Free Stop Stop Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% Volume (veh/h) 45 620 25 5 720 5 25 15 10 10 15 70 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate (vph) 49 674 27 5 783 5 27 16 11 11 16 76 r Pedestrians EL ` Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) piPercent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None None Median storage veh) PI Upstream signal (ft) pX, platoon unblocked vC, conflicting volume 788 701 1258 1571 337 1247 1592 391 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 788 701 1258 1571 337 1247 1592 391 _" tC, single (s) 4.1 4.1 7.5 6.5 6.9 7.5 6.5 6.9 r: tC, 2 stage (s) tF(s) 2.2 2:2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 p0 queue free % 94 99 71 84 98 90 84 87 t'' cM capacity(veh/h) 827 892 93 102 659 107 99 608 t ; Diredloh,Lana# . EB 1 ' EB;2 EB 3 % E94":•WB 1,,WB 2 ...WE'S , WB d NB,1'-', NB 2' SE 1 S9;2 Volume Total 49 ; 337 337 27 5 391 391 5 27 27 11 16 ( Volume Left 49 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 27 0 11 0 ' Volume Right 0 0 0 27 0 0 0 5 0 11 0 0 cSH 827 1700 1700 1700 892 1700 1700 1700 93 155 107 99 Volume to Capacity 0.06 0.20 0.20 0.02 '0.01 0.23 0.23 0.00 0.29 0.18' 0.10 0.16 f'' Queue Length 95th (ft) 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 15 8 14 Control Delay(s) 9.6 0,0 0.0 0.0 9.1 r 0.0 0:0 0.0 59.2 33.2 42.5 48.2 I' Lane LOS A A FDEE ti»! Approach Delay(s) 0.6 0.1 46.2 20.8 Approach LOS E C ., Intersection Sum' rriary' k_ Average Delay 3.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 41.3%' ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 .1 Liberty Property (LSC#051470) w 2010 AM Peak Bgrnd with improvements Page 1 LSC, Inc. iiHCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2: SH 66 & WCR R 5 1/22/2007 f --♦. C 4\ t t \. 1 4/ Movement EBL EBT ; EBR°' WBL . WBT WBR NBC NBT' NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations lS ft rt 'I ft r ) T, ) + r Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 . Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.94 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 3539 1583 1770 3539 1583 1770 1749 1770 1863 1583 Flt Permitted 0.29 1.00 1.00 0.34 1.00 1.00 0.75 1.00 0.74 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 545 3539 1583 640 3539 1583 1392 1749 1378 1863 1583 i Volume (vph) 45 620 25 5 720 5 25 15 10 10 15 70 1 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow(vph) 49 674 27 5 783 5 .27 16 11 11 16 76 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 13 0 0 2 0 9 0 0 0 62 ' Lane Group Flow(vph) 49 674 14 5 783 3 27 18 0 11 16 14 Turn Type pm+pt Perm pm+pt Perm pm+pt pm+pt Perm Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 4 8 8 2 6 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 53.0 48.0 48.0 53.0 48.0 48.0 21.0 16.0 21.0 16.0 16.0 Effective Green, g (s) 53.0 48.0 48.0 53.0 48.0 48.0 21.0 16.0 21.0 16.0 16.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.59 0.53 0.53 0.59 0.53 0.53 0.23 0.18 0.23 0.18 0.18 Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 389 1887 844 440 1887 844 346 311 343 331 281 v/s Ratio Prot c0.01 0.19 0.00 c0.22 c0.00 0.01 0.00 0.01 ' ' v/s Ratio Perm 0.07 0.01 0.01 0.00 c0.01 0.01 0.01 . v/c Ratio 0.13 0.36 0.02 0.01 0.41 0.00 0.08 0.06 0.03 0.05 0.05 Uniform Delay, dl 8.3 12.1 9.9 7.8 12.6 9.8 26.9 30.7 26.6 30.7 30.7 P:".: Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.7 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.4 0.4 0.2 0.3 0.3 Delay(s) 8.9 12.6 9.9 7.9 13.3 9.8 27.3 31.1 26.8 31.0 31.0 Level of Service A B A AB A CC C C C Approach Delay(s) 12.3 13.2 29.2 30.6 Approach LOS B B C C F Intersection-Summary I - ' ' • - - . ' ' . ' - • - . - - . .. ,-, L HCM Average Control Delay 14.4 HCM Level of Service B HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.30 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 90.0 Sum of lost time(s) 16.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 41.3% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Liberty Property (LSC#051470) 2010 AM Peak Bgrnd with improvements Page 2 LSC, Inc. HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 1: WCR 32 & WCR 5 1/22/2007 C ~ k t , 1 d N( iiem it'• •. ' ` -;SBL:' EBT EBR WBL WB' ` WBR NBL SST 74$I Lane Configurations 4 4 4 4 Sigh Control Stop -Stop. . Free Free Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% Volume(veh/h) 5 5 5 5 5 5..• 5 110 5 5 85 5 • Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate (vph) 5 5 : 5 . 5 5 .5 5 120 5 5 92 5 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) • Walking Speed (ft/s) r Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type!.:::. None • None Median storage veh) F) Upstream signal(ft) pX, platoon unblocked vC, conflicting volume 247 242 95. 247: 242 122 98 125 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2,stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 2.47 242 95 247 242 122 98 125 tC, single(s) 7.1 6.5 6:2 ' 7,1 .6.5 6.2 4.1 4.1 tC, 2 stage (s) tF(s) 3.5 4.0 3.3 ' '3,5 : 4.0 3.3 2.2 2.2 p0 queue free % 99 99 99 99 99 99 100 100 cM capacity(veh/h) 694 655 .:962. .694 655 . 929 1495 1462 Direction; Lane# . SB 1 Valurne Total 16 .16: . -130 103 i., Volume Left 5 5 5 5 Volume Right:.. 5 - ' 5 5 5 . . cSH 748 742 1495 1462 Volume to Capacity 0.02 0.02-• 0.00;. 0:00. 11.s Queue Length 95th (ft) 2 2 0 0 Control Delay(s) 9.9 10.0 . 0.3• : 0.4 Lane LOS A A A A Approach Delay(s) 9.9 10.0". 0.3 0.4 trti Approach LOS A A . ...:. i- £� 7 ..,.:,.. R..- k�-r�":'i"5.•rs-'<..�':1+'C'.. i ,.�2s'::.'2iq.^�:,h.Y.�:b::•.:.d:o:r:.:. i_.R.t•,:ltS'�.: � .'.R" �'tis.%'' ... ._ .. ,:..�."�...,Ye:-•:.�..-i._n. _.�.. _,�[.!. ......, .•<..:f<8 Q....:,'P4Yl_. . .:...y ..5.; - �.y.;:u �:��,.:t.:..`.... s':::? IhtBr�'ecfio �d zl`-�..,_ •y,f,_ .. _ , .s... .. • � . � - � � r..5 .s1 �.�...P.� r.. r. .'.d�'. •-- ..i�x" • .. .. . , .vr.... .........:.i:t"�-�•�,�:i .Y�i'N.._., � Average Delay 1.5 intersection Capacity Utilization 17;J% . ICU level•of:Service A. Analysis Period (min) 15 . • Liberty Property p rty(LSC#051470) 2010 PM Peak Bgrnd with improvements Page 1 LSC, Inc. HCM Unsi nalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 9 P Y 2: SH 66 & WCR 5 • 1/22/2007 EBR WBL WBT_:.WBR ='NBL:�-:".NBT ICI :: ::.SBL:' Stiff SBR Lane Configurations 4� ft r 1r, r Sign Control :.Free ... Free Stop Stop. Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% Volume(veh/h) 85 720 . 25 • i10 750 15 25 • 20 5 10 • 25 60 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate (vph) 92 783 27 11 : 815 16 27 22 •5' .11 -• 27' 65 Pedestrians Lane Width(ft) . . .. Walking Speed (ft/s) ri Percent Blockage LI Right turn flare (veh) Median type None None FA, Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft). pX, platoon unblocked vC, conflicting volume: :832 810 1476.. 1821 391 1429 1832. .408 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2.conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 832 810 1476 1821 391 1429 1832 408 tC,single(s) 4.1 4.1 7.5 6.5 6.9 7.5 8.5 6.9 tC,2 stage(s) tF(s) .. 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 r. s p0 queue free% 88 99 44 67 99 83 59 89 CM capacity(veh/h) 797 812 . 48 67 608 .64 66 593 blrec on, Lane# EB 1 EB 2 ` EB 3 E13:4 iNB 11 i` ₹'.WB S SIVB 4. NB 1 i 2 56 1 otp Volume Total 92 391 391 27 - 11 .: 408 408 . 16 27 27 • 11 27 Volume Left 92 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 27 0 11 0 Volume Right 0 0 0-.. ,.27 :0 •0. , 0 16 0 5 0 0 cSH 797 1700 '1700 1700 812 1700 1700 1700 48 81 64 66 Volume to Capacity 0:12 0,23 : 0.23 0.02 ;:i:0.01 0.24 .. 0:24 0.01 ;..0:58. 0:33 0.17 041 ••• Queue Length 95th (ft) 10 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 53 32 14 40 Control Delay(s) .: :10.1.. 0.0 . 0.0 0.0 9.5 1 0:0 0:0 0.0 :150.5 70.0 72A::: 93:7 Lane LOS B A F F F F Approach Delay(s) . 1.0 0.1 : :110:2 39:,7' Approach LOS F E Irtf"erse�i`Or1.S - - Average Delay 5.9 intersection Capacity Utilization 43.5% : ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 z . Liberty Property (LSC#051470) 2010 PM Peak Bgrnd with improvements Page 1 LSC, Inc HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2: SH 66 & WCR 5 1/22/2007 - -\ t t ti 1 d Movement Elk : EBT- ERR WBL WBT WEIR: 'NBL NBT "NRR 56L?. $BT. SRR • Lane Configurations 11 ft r tie P 1+ t r Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 - 1900_ 1900 ; 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 LaneUtil. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00- 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1:00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1:00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 ; 1.00 0:95" 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 3539 1583 1770 3539 1583 1770 1811 1770 1863 1583 Flt Permitted 0.28 1.00 1.00 ` 0.29 1.00 1:00 0.74 1.00 0.74 1.00 1:00 Satd. Flow (perm) 519 3539 1583 545 3539 1583 1378 1811 1378 1863 1583 r Volume (vph) 85 720 25 10 750 15 25 20 5 10 25 60 r Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow(vph) ; 92 783 27 11 815 16 27 22 5 11 27 65 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 13 0 0 7 0 4 0 0 0 53 Lane Group Flow (vph) 92 783 14 11 815 9 27 23 0 11 27 - ` 12 Turn Type pm+pt Perm pm+pt Perm pm+pt pm+pt Perm Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 4 8 8 2 6 6 Actuated Green,G (s) 53.0 48.0 48.0 53.0 ' 48.0 48.0 21.0 16.0 21.0' '16.0 16.0 Effective Green, g (s) 53.0 48.0 48.0 53.0 48.0 48.0 21.0 16.0 21.0 16.0 16.0 Actuated g/CRatio 0.59 0.53 0.53 0.59 0.53 0.53 '0.23 0.18 0.23 0.18 0.18 Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 375 1887 844 389 1887 844 343 322 343 331 281 v/s Ratio Prot c0.01 0.22 0.00 c0.23 c0.00 0.01 0.00 c0.01 w'3 v/s Ratio Perm 0.13 0.01 0.02 . 0.01; `0.01 0.01 0.01 v/c Ratio 0.25 0.41 0.02 0.03 0.43 0.01 0.08 0.07 0.03 0.08 0.04 Uniform Delay,''dl 8.6 '12:6 9.9 !'' 8.1 12.7 9.9 26:9 ' 30.8 26.6 30.9 ?'30.6 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 1.6 0:7 0.0 °' 0.1 0.7 0:0 0.4 0.4 0.2 0.5 0.3 Delay(s) 10.1 13.3 9.9 8.2 13.5 9.9 27.3 31.2 26.8 31.4 30.9 f,;,.t Level of Service' B B A A B A C C CCC t,., Approach Delay(s) 12.8 13.3 29 3 30.6 Approach LOS $ B CC tapir&ofion Summary , , tr, HCM Average Control Delay g 14.5 i HCM Level of Service B HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.32 t>: Actuated Cycle Length (s)' 90.0 Sum of lost time (s) 16.0 i Intersection Capacity Utilization 43.5% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group t Liberty Property (LSC#051470) 2010 PM Peak Bgrnd with improvements Page 2 LSC, Inc. • HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 1: WCR 32 & WCR 5 1/22/2007 k• 4\ t t ' 1 -' F, Movement EEL BT ' EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL . NET NBR SBL` SET SBR Lane Configurations 4* 4 4, 4, Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free - Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% Volume (veh/h) 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 265 ` 25 25 265 5 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0 92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 092 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate (vph) 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 288 27 27 288 5 • Pedestrians • Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) r Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) 4 pX, platoon unblocked vC, conflicting volume 666 ! 671 291 666 660 302 293 315 • vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 666 671 291 666 660 302 293 315 • tb, single(s) 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 4.1 4.1 tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s) - 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 2.2 2.2' p0 queue free % 98 99 99 98 99 99 100 98 CM capacity(veh/h) 359 368 748 359 373 738 1268 1245 Direction, Lane 11' EB 1 WB 1'"-''NB 1 ;SB i " - ,` . Volume Total 16 16 321 321 Volume Left 5 5 5 27 Volume Right 5 5 27 5 cSH 438 440 1268 1245 Volume to Capacity 0.04 0.04 0.00 0.02 Queue Length 95th (ft) 3 3 0 2 Control Delay(s) 13.5 - 13.5 0.2 0.9 Lane LOS B B A A Approach Delay(s) 13.5 13,5 02 0.9 Approach LOS B B t. Intersection Summary Average Delay 1.1 Intersection Capacity Utilization 38.4% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 Liberty Property (LSC#051470) 2030 AM Peak Bgrnd with improvements Page 1 LSC, Inc. HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2: SH 66 & WCR 5 1/22/2007 C t- t t p `► 1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL VVBT WBR“ NBL NET NBR SBL: SBT , SBR Lane Configurations 111 tt r ►( tt r 1 t r Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1,00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1:00 1:00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0,95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95" 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 3539 1583 1770 3539 1583 1770 1804 1770 1863 1583 Flt Permitted 0.33 1.00 1.00 0.33 1.00 1,00 0.61 1.00 0.53 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 615 3539 1583 615 3539 1583 1141 1804 985 1863 1583 Volume (vph) 155 645 155 30 645 30 155 115 30 30 115 155 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow(vph) 168 701 168 33 701 33 168 125 33 33 125 168 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 78 0 0 15 0 11 0 0 0 138 r Lane Group Flow(vph) 168 ' 701 90 33 701 18 168 147 0 33 125 30 Turn Type ' pm+pt Perm pm+pt Perm pm+pt pm+pt Perm Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 • 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 4 8 8 2 6 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 53.0 48.0 48.0 53.0 48.0 48.0 21.0 16,0 21.0 16.0 16.0 Effective Green, g (s) 53.0 48.0 48.0 53.0 48.0 48.0 21.0 16.0 21.0 16.0 16.0 r Actuated g/C Ratio 0.59 0.53 0.53 0.59 0.53 0.53 0.23 0.18 0.23 0.18 0.18 k. Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 426 1887 844 426 1887 844 301 321 273 331 281 v/s Ratio Prot c0.02 0.20 0.00 0.20 c0.03 0.08 0.01 0.07 v/s Ratio Perm c0.21 0.06 0.04 0.01 00.10 0.02 0.02 v/c Ratio 0.39 0.37 0.11 0.08 0.37 0.02 0.56 0.46 0.12 0.38 0.11 Uniform Delay,d1 8.7 12.2 10.4 8.0 `12.2 9.9 -29.8 33 1' 27.0 32,6 31:0 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 2.7 0.6 0.3 0.4 -0.6 0.0 7,3 ' 4,7 0:9 33 0.8 Delay(s) 11.5 12.8 10.6 8.4 12.8 10.0 37.1 37.8 27.9 35.9 31.8 :" Level of Service B B B A B A D D CDC Approach Delay(s) 12.2 12.5 37.4 33.0 Approach LOS B B D C f:. Iritersection'Summ`ary"" l:< HCM Average Control Delay 18.4 HCM Level of Service B HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.44 Fa Actuated Cycle Length (s) 90.0 Sum of lost time (s) 16.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 54.4% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period,(min) 15 c Critical Lane Group • • Liberty Property (LSC#051470) 2030 AM Peak Bgrnd with improvements Page 2 LSC, Inc. HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 1: WCR 32 & WCR 5 1/22/2007 Movement EBL .EBT EBR WBL WBT': 1N8R NBL.: rf!1C ' ,:`l�E t sBl_ , SBt SI3R Lane Configurations 4, 4, 4+ . 4 Sign Control :Stop Stop Free . Free - • Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% ' Volume(veh/h) 5 10 • 5 5 10.: ': 5:•. : - 5 330 30 30.. .330 5 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0-92 0.92 Hourly flow rate(vph) : 5 11 5 5 1.1. 5 1.5 359 • 33 33 359 5 ' • Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) . Walking Speed (ft/s) r Percent Blockage Li Right turn flare(veh) Median type None . .: . None Median storage veh) Upstream signal.(ft) pX, platoon unblocked vC,conflicting volume 823 829 361 823 815. 375 ,364 391 .: vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage'2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 823 829 361 823 815 375 364 391 f' tC;single:(s) 7.1 6.5 6.2 7--1 6:5 6:2 4.1 4.1 t..; tC, 2 stage(s) tF(s) , 3,5 4.0 : 3.3 3.5 4.0 3,3 • .2,2 2.2 .,, p0 queue free % 98 96 99 98 96 99 100 97 cM capacity(veh/h) 275 296 683 275 302 671 1194 1167 .�r=: '..<:".x�. i'�,,:�l.ar',w�'�'A'�,`k_,:3`J•�, ��.A:s:''^'s�f,L:,4`�`'� ':"a��; ''�"'w't:�'�`�N'h•;w��i:'"�'""-:�'�•ipY'a-�r}, CbFrec1 n, ti' v'°EB 1 'Will" ,Nit SB 1 ,x �, 'i:4Wit�^-1,»i'g .. :44,^;:ii K ANi�I'4k."t'i:�k:. =4'v+•l. 4 Volume Total 22 22 397 397 .r. Volume Left 5 5 5 33 Volume Right.: 5 5 . 33 :5 . cSH 338 340 1194 1167 Volume to Ca pac ••0.06' ° 0.06. 0.00: .::0;03 . p rtY.. . . Queue Length 95th (ft) 5 5 0 2 Control;Delay(s) 16.4 :16. : : 0:2 0.9. Lane LOS CC A A L Approach belay(s) 16.4 .,:...16.3 0.2 '::: .'0.9:... Approach LOS C C ._ ., c..;.:. -„�,-. .:...r_•t .•.,,.. • ,..::... • _. .. .... ..t +'`" 7?�"' :J,':,�.,x:-y;',r.,' 7�•f �is;:r:rs�.r,,'z...� rF•�.:;:b lrttersen Sumrrfary Average Delay 1.4 Intersection Capacity Utilization 45,7% ICU•Level of Service: • A c Analysis Period (min) 15 • Ri ' J F•/ Liberty Property (LSC#051470) 2030 PM Peak Bgrnd with improvements Page 1 LSC, Inc. Fl t ' HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2: SH 66 & WCR 5 1/22/2007 r -. te II-- 't q t t \" 1 d r Movement ` EBL EST.:. EBB.' 'WBL WBT WBR .NBC NBT NBI SBL ;. 'SBT , SBR Lane Configurations vi ft r 'i TT r ' T. ) t r Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 : 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 7 Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 < '1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1_00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1:00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1,00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 3539 1583 1770 3539 1583 1770 1809 1770 1863 1583 ' ' Fit Permitted 0.25 1.00 1.00' 0.25 1.00 1.00 0.53 1.00 0.43 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow(perm) 469 3539 1583 469 3539 1583 985 1809 809 1863 1583 ri Volume(vph) 190 810 190 35 810 35 190 145 35 35 145 190 [; Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow(vph) 207 880 207 38 880 38 207 158 38 38 158 207 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 97 0 0 18 0 10 0 0 0 170 Lane Group Flow (vph) 207 880 110 38 880 20 207 186 0 38 158 37 Turn Type pm+pt Perm pm+pt Perm pm+pt pm+pt Perm g Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6 > ! Permitted Phases 4 4 8 8 2 6 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 53.0 48.0 48.0 53.0 48.0 48.0 21.0 16.0 21.0 16.0 16.0 Effective Green, g (s) 53.0 48.0 48.0 53.0 48.0 48.0 21.0 16.0 21.0 16.0 16.0 T Actuated g/C Ratio 0.59 0.53 0.53 0.59 0.53 0.53 ' 0.23 0.18 0.23 0.18 0.18 Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 348 1887 844 348 1887 844 273 322 242 331 281 r-. v/s Ratio Prot c0.03 0.25 0.01 0.25 c0.04 0.10 0.01 0.08 [) v/s Ratio Perm c0.32 0.07 0.06 0.01 c0.13 0.03 0.02 v/c Ratio 0.59 0.47 0.13 0.11 0.47 0.02 0.76 0.58 0 16 0.48 0.13 Uniform Delay, d1 9.6 13:0 10.5 ' 8.4 13.0 9.9 31:7 33.9 27,2- 33.2 ` 31:1 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental belay, d2 7.3 0.8 0.3 0.6 " 0.8 0,1 17.8 7.4 1.4' 4.9 1.0 Delay(s) 16.9 13.9 10.9 9.1 13.9 10.0 49.5 41.3 28.6 38.1 32.1 Level of Service B B B A B A D D CDC (..; Approach Delay (s) 13.9 13.5 45.5 34.1 Approach LOS B B 0 C t`' Interseetion7Summary L HCM Average Control Delay 20.6 HCM Level of Service C HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.64 -:; Actuated Cycle Length (s) ' 90.0 Sum of lost time(s) 16.0 r. Intersection Capacity Utilization 64.4% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 ;' c Critical Lane Group z Fi Liberty Property (LSC#051470) 6' 2030 PM Peak Bgrnd with improvements Page 2 LSC, Inc. er HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 1: WCR 32 & WCR 5 1/22/2007 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR '..NBC ?NBT NBR SBL SET ri Lane Configurations 4+ 4. Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% Volume(veh/h) 5 5 5 48 6 7 5 56 ' 23 6 86 ' 5 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourlyflowrate(vph) - 5 5 5 52 7 8 5 61 25 7 93 - 5 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (fUs) Percent Blockage, Right turn flare (veh) Median type None None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) t ' pX, platoon unblocked vC, conflicting Volume' ` 204 206 96 ` 202 196 73 99 86 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 204 206 96 202 196 73 99 86 tC, single (s) 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 ' 4,1 4.1 tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s) ' 3.5' 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 2.2 2.2 R,.. p0 queue free % 99 99 99 93 99 99 100 100 cM capacity(veh/h) 738 - 685 960 743 694 9B8 1494 1510 Dirrcfiorr„Lane#1' ES 1 WEE, NB 1' ;581 _.` ` Volume Total '. 16 66 91 105 Volume Left 5 52 5 7 Volume Right , 5 ' 8 25 ` 5 cSH 778 760 1494 1510 Volume to Capacity 0:02 0.09 0.00 0.00 Queue Length 95th (ft) 2 7 0 0 Control Delay(s)' 9.7 10.2 0.5 0.5 Lane LOS A B A A Approach Delay(s) 9.7 10,2 0.5" 0.5 Approach LOS A B °j Ihier ectioYi.5iiri mary � Average Delay 3.3 Intersection Capacity Utilization 20.5% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 • Liberty Property (LSC#051470) 2010 AM Peak Total with improvements Page 1 LSC, Inc. `" HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2: SH 66 & WCR 5 1/22/2007 Movement . " BBL EBT? EBR WBL WBT :WBR • MBL NBT "NBR' SBL'; SBT SBR Lane Configurations " 44 r ►t tt r 'I 1, ) t r Ideal Flow(vphpl) ' 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 r. Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00< 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.94 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 ' 0.95 1.00 1.00` 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1:00 p. Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 3539 1583 1770 3539 1583 1770 1749 1770 1863 1583 t' Flt Permitted 0.29 1.00 1.00 0.34 1.00 1.00 0.75 1.00 0.74- 1.00 ,1.00 Satd. Flow(perm) 545 3539 1583 640 3539 1583 1390 1749 1378 1863 1583 n Volume (vph) 69 620 25 5 720 26 25 15 - 10 60 16 <=127 iA Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0 92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow(vph) 75 674 27 5 783 28 27 16 11 65 17 138 7] RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 13 0 0 13 0 9 0 0 0 113 H Lane Group Flow.(vph) 75 674 14 5 783 15 ' 27 - 18 -0 -:65 17 '. 25 Turn Type pm+pt Perm pm+pt Perm pm+pt pm+pt Perm r., Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 4 8 8 2 6 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 53.0 48.0 48.0 53.0 ,48.0 48.0 21.0 16.0 21.0 16.0' 16.0 Effective Green, g (s) 53.0 48.0 48.0 53.0 48.0 48.0 21.0 16.0 21.0 16.0 16.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.59 0.53 0.53 0.59 0.53' 0.53 0.23 ' 0.18 0.23 0.18 0.18 Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 389 1887 844 440 1887 844 345 311 343 331 281 iill v/s Ratio Prot c0.01 0.19 0.00 c0.22 0.00 0.01 c0.01 0.01 ': v/s Ratio Perm 0.10 0.01 0.01 0:01` 0.01 c0.03 0:02 v/c Ratio 0.19 0.36 0.02 0.01 0.41 0.02 0.08 0.06 0.19 0.05 0.09 Uniform Delay, dl 8.4 12.1 - 9.9 7.8 "12.6 9.9 26.9 30.7 27.5 30.7 30:9 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 '.: Incremental Delay, d2 1.1 0,5 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.4 "0.4 1.2 0.3 0.6 Delay(s) 9.5 12.6 9.9 7.9 13.3 9.9 27.3 31.1 28.7 31.0 31.5 r; Level of Service A B A A B ACC C CC rli Approach Delay (s) 12.2 13.1 29.2 30.6 Approach LOS B B C C Intefsticlion7S"umr'riary ,` ..-.\',?;..-<-1 , Li HCM Average Control Delay 15.3 HCM Level of Service B HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.34 7-.. Actuated Cycle Length (s) 90.0 Sum of lost time(s) 16.0 s Intersection Capacity Utilization 43.7% ICU Level of Service A Analysis'Period'(min) 15 c Critical Lane Group r t. Liberty Property(LSC#051470) F.: 2010 AM Peak Total with improvements Page 2 LSC, Inc. r, tii- HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 5: South Site Access & WCR 5 1/22/2007 4 t i' \► Movement WBL WBR NBT NER SEQ. SBT- Lane Configurations ►Y+ t 4 Sign Control Stop Free Free Grade 0% 0% 0% Volume(veh/h) 65 2 83 27 1 138 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate (vph) 71 2 90 29 1 150 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft)' Walking Speed (ft/s) sg Percent Blockage E.t Right turn flare (veh) Median type None Median storage veh) ' Upstream signal (ft) pX, platoon unblocked vC, conflicting volume 257 105 120 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2,stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 257 105 120 tC, single (s) 6.4 6.2 4.1 tC, 2 stage (s) 3.5 3.3 2.2 p0 queue free °/0 90 100 100 ;'. cM capacity(veh/h) 731 950 1468 birect16n, Lane'# : .VUB-1 NB 1 SB;1 Volume Total 73 120 151 Volume Left 71 0 1 Volume Right 2 29 0 cSH 736 1700 1468 Volume to Capacity 0.10 0.07 0.00 Queue Length 95th (ft) 8 0 0 Control belay(s) 10.4 0.0 0.1 Lane LOS B A 1;3 Approach belay(s) 10.4 0.0 0.1 Approach LOS B intersection Summary Average Delay 2.2 Intersection Capacity Utilization 18.4% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 Liberty Property (LSC#051470) 2010 AM Peak Total with,improvements Page 3 LSC, Inc. 17: HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis : 6: WCR 32 & Western Site Access 1/22/2007 `* c 4— 4N P Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations '�, 4 Sign Control Free Free Stop Grade 0% 0% 0% Volume(veh/h) 20 10 0 33 23 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate(vph) 22 11 0 36 25 0 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) Pt.s.. pX, platoon unblocked vC, conflicting volume 33 63 27 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2,stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 33 63 27 tC,single (s) 4.1 6.4 6.2 tC, 2 stage(s) tF(s) 2.2 3.5 3.3 p0 queue free % 100 97 100 f�' cM capacity(veh/h) 1579 943 1048 Direction, Lane'it EB 1 TWB 1 NB 1 '.ij' 7 Volume Total 33 36 25 t;: Volume Left 0 0 25 Volume Right 11 0 0: cSH 1700 1579 943 $ Volume to Capacity 0.02 0.00 0.03 Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 0 2 Control Delay(s) 0.0 0.0 8.9 Pt- Lane LOS A ≤_, Approach Delay(s) 0.0 0.0 8.9 Approach LOS A ' intersectiion Summary '�,'" t... Average Delay 2.4 Intersection Capacity Utilization 13.3% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 r: :r 1. Liberty Property(LSC#051470) ti 2010 AM Peak Total with improvements Page 4 LSC,, Inc. HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis r.. 8: WCR 32 & Eastern Site Access 1/22/2007 4-- 4\ P • Movement EBT EBR "WBL WBT NBC NBR Lane Configurations 4 "fr Sign Control Free Free Stop Grade 0% 0% 0% Volume (veh/h) 10 10 0 10 23 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 • Hourly flow rate (vph) 11 11 0 11 25 1 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None Median storage veh) Fi,) Upstream signal (ft) pX, platoon unblocked vC,conflicting volume 22 . 27 16 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 22 27 16 tC,single (s) 4.1 6.4 6.2 tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s) 2:2 3.5 3.3 p0 queue free % 100 97 100 cM capacity (veh/h) 1594 988 1063 Directioh'.Lahe# - Volume Total 22 11 26 Volume Left 0 0 25 Volume Right 11 0 1 cSH 1700 1594 991 Volume to Capacity 0.01 0.00- 0.03 Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 0 2 Control Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 8.7 Lane LOS A [1 Approach Delay(s) 0.0 0.0 ; 8.7 Approach LOS A lnteraectiori Summary Average Delay 3.9 Intersection Capacity Utilization 13.3%` ICU Level of Service A r. Analysis Period (min) 15 • Liberty Property (LSC#051470) • 2010 AM Peak Total with improvements Page 5 LSC, Inc. HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis ,„ 1: WCR 32 & WCR 5 1/22/2007 : Movement EBL EBT:' EBR "WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT • 14BR . SBL SBT • SdR Lane Configurations 4, 4, 4, 4 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free • Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% Volume (veh/h) 5 6 ` 6 55 6 7 6 '` 112 72 8 87 5 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate (vph) 5 7 7 60 7 8 7 122 78 9 95 5 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) r Percent Blockage [4 Right turn flare (veh) Median type None None (a Median storage veh) Ii Upstream signal (ft) 4` pX, platoon unblocked vC,conflicting volume 299 328 97 ''298 291 161 100 200 • • vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 299 328 97 298 291 161 100 200 • tC, single (s) 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 4.1 4:1 tC, 2 stage (s) tF(s) 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 2:2 2.2 p0 queue free % 99 99 99 91 99 99 100 99 cM capacity(veh/h) 637 585 959 639 613 884 1493 1372 Direclibri, Lane#' . EB 1 WB 1, N81. =SB 1 Volume Total 18 74 207 109 . Volume Left 5 60 7 9 Volume Right 7 8 78 5 cSH 697 655 1493 1372 Volume to Capacity 0.03 0.11 0.00 0.01 ' Queue Length 95th (ft) 2 9 0 0 Control belay(s)- 10.3 11:2 0.3 0.7 Lane LOS B B A A Approach Delay(s) 10.3 11.2 0.3- - 0.7 Approach LOS B B ¢' Intersection Summary Average Delay 2.8 Intersection Capacity Utilization 27.4% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 • Liberty Property (LSC#051470) 2010 PM Peak Total with improvements Page 1 LSC, Inc. HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2: SH 66 & WCR 5 1/22/2007 '' - —• 'o► s 't t O v► 1 I `" Movement EBL EBT; EBR' WBL WB7 WBR NBL NBT NBR- SBL SST, SBt2 Lane Configurations 1 tt r 'i ft r is f r Sign Control Free Free Stop Stop Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% Volume (veh/h) 173 720 25 10 750 92 25 22 5 68 26 126 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate (vph) 188 783 27 11 815 100 27 24 5 74 28 137 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage 1.'„:4 Right turn flare (veh) Median type None None Median storage veh) Lt Upstream signal (ft) pX, platoon unblocked vC, conflicting volume 915 810 1739 2096 391 1622 2023 408 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 915 810 1739 2096 391 1622 2023 408 tC, single (s) 4.1 4.1 7.5 6.5 6.9 7.5 6.5 6.9 tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s) , 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 ; 3.3 3.5 4.0 ,3.3 ▪ p0 queue free % 75 99 0 37 99 0 33 77 cM capacity(veh/h) 741 812 16 38 608 28 42 593 Direction; Larie#; EB1` 'EIS 2' -BB3 `;EB4 WB1tWB2:EWB3,--1./1/8 `,-N NB.2-;'-'88 =" -'B72 • Volume Total 188 391 391 , 27 11 408 408 ",100 27 29 74 28 Volume Left 188 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 27 0 74 0 Volume Right 0 0 0 27 0 0 0 100 0 5 0 0 cSH 741 1700 1700 1700 812 1700 1700 1700 16 46 28 42 Volume to Capacity 0,25 0.23 0.23 0.02 0,01 0.24 0.24 0.06 1.68 0.64 2.69 0.67 Queue Length 95th (ft) 25 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 99 61 223 63 Control Delay(s) 11.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 9:5 0.0 0.0 0.0 815.5 173:1 .1065.0 193:0 • Lane LOS B A F F F F Approach Delay(s) 2.2 0.1 482:0 359.4 Approach LOS F F H Intet$e�Eroti5umrriary' ,' , , • Average Delay 52.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 50.8% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 ?ry • Liberty Property (LSC#051470) ▪ 2010 PM Peak Total with improvements Page 1 LSC, Inc. , HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis �.; 2: SH 66 & WCR 5 1/22/2007 "` Movement EEL EBT`, EBR` CNBL WBT WEIR !=NBL NBT NBR SBL SEM SBR Lane Configurations '5 ft r '1 t r '5 1+ ►j t r Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 19b0 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 ` 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0,95 : 1.00 1:00 ' 0.95 1,00 1.00 1.00 1:00 ' 1.00 1:00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1:00 0.95' '1.00 1.00 0.95' 1.00 ' 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow(prot) 177O 3539 1583 1770 3539 1583 1770 1815 1770 1863 1583 • Flt Permitted 0.28 1.00 1.00 0.29 "1.00 1.00 0.74 1.00 0.74 ; 1,00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 519 3539 1583 545 3539 1583 1377 1815 1375 1863 1583 Volume(vph) 173 720 25 10 750 92 25 22 5 68 26 126 4 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow(vph) 188 783 27 11 815 100 27 24 5 74 28 137 • RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 13 0 0 47 0 4 0 0 0 113 ✓ Lane Group Flow(vph) 188 783 14 11 815 53 27 25 0 74 28 24 Turn Type pm+pt Perm pm+pt Perm pm+pt pm+pt Perm Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 4 8 8 2 6 6 Actuated Green,G (s) 53:0 48.0 48.0 53.0 48.0 48.0 21.0 16.0 21.0 16.0 16.0 Effective Green, g (s) 53.0 48.0 48.0 53.0 48.0 48.0 21.0 16.0 21.0 16.0 16.0 `' Actuated g/C Ratio 0.59 0.53 0.53 0.59 0.53 0.53 0.23 0.18 0.23 0.18 0.18 .1' Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 375 1887 844 389 1887 844 343 ! 323 343 331 281 U v/s Ratio Prot c0.03 0.22 0.00 0.23 0.00 0.01 c0.01 0.02 �.` v/s Ratio Perm c0.27 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.01 c0.04 0.02 v/c Ratio 0.50 0.41 0.02 0.03 0.43 0.06 0.08 0.08 0.22 0.08 0.09 Uniform Delay, dl 9.2 126 9.9 ' 8.1 12.7 10.1 26.9 30.8 27,6 30,9 30.9 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay; d2 4:7 0:7' 0.0 ;0.1 0:7 0.1 - 0.4 0.5 1,4 i' 0.5 06 Delay(s) 13.9 13.3 9.9 8.2 13.5 10.3 27.3 31.3 29.0 31.4 31.5 Level of Service B B A A B BCC CCC Approach Delay (s) 13,3 13.1 29.4 30.7 Approach LOS B- B C C } intersectian;Summary ;: , ; E_ HCM Average;Control Delay 15.5 HCM Level of Service B HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.42 '" Actuated Cycle Length (s) 90.0 Sum of lost time(s) 16.0 , Intersection Capacity Utilization 50.8% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group ryifi l�S Liberty Property (LSC#051470) 2010 PM Peak Total with,improvements Page 2 LSC, Inc. HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 5: South Site Access & WCR 5 1/22/2007 Movement WBL : WBR- NBT =; NBR ` SBL' SBT` • Lane Configurations ►T 4 Sign Control Stop Free Free • Grade 0% 0% 0% Volume(veh/h) 75 2 187 100 3 145 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate (vph) 82 2 203 109 3 158 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) EPercent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type Norte Median storage veh) h.. Upstream signal (ft) pX, platoon unblocked vC, conflicting volume 422 258 312 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 422 258 312 F-.. tC, single (s) 6.4 6.2 4.1 r`. tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s) 3.5 3.3 2.2 • p0 queue free % 86 100 100 cM capacity(veh/h) 587 781 1248 • Direo#ion,Lane;ek7, . WB 1'.12.NB 1 Volume Total 84 312 161 Volume Left 82 0 3 Volume Right 2 109 0 cSH 591 1700 1248 Volume to Capacity 0.14 0.18 0.00 " Queue Length 95th (ft) 12 0 0 Control Delay(s) 12.1 0.0 0.2 . .. Lane LOS B A 1 Approach Delay(s) 12.1 0.0 0.2 Approach LOS B • Intersects' n r. f =.' • Average Delay 1.9 Intersection Capacity Utilization 26.9% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 f.. Liberty Property (LSC#051470) 2010 PM Peak Total with improvements Page 3 LSC, Inc. HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 6: WCR 32 & Western Site Access 1/22/2007 -. _p c 4- 4\ l+' Movement , • EBT EBR :1A/BY. Lane Configurations 4 V Sign Control Free Free Stop Grade 0% 0% 0% Volume(veh/h) 46 36 1 36 26 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate (vph) 50 39 1 39 28 1 Pedestrians 4= Lane Width(ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) ti Percent Blockage ' ;A Right turn flare (veh) Median type None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) pX, platoon unblocked vC, conflicting volume 89 111 70 f; vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 89 111 70 tC, single(s) 4.1 6.4 6.2 . - tC, 2 stage (s) tF(s) 2.2 p0 queue free % 100 97 100 cM capacity(veh/h) 1506 885 993 ,: 1�lrection Lane# :EB i ',WB 1 Ng- f • .. . �� Q.::: Volume Total 89 40 29 '••-• Volume Left 0 1 28 Volume Right 39 0 1 • cSH 1700 1506 889 Volume to Capacity 0.05 0.00 0.03 • Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 0 3 Control Delay(s) 0.0 0.2 9.2 Lane LOS A A Approach Delay(s) 0.0 0.2 9.2 Approach LOS A Intersection Summary Average Delay 1.8 Intersection Capacity Utilization 14.6% ICU Level of Service A F. Analysis Period (min) 15 Liberty Property (LSC#051470) 2010 PM Peak Total with improvements Page 4 LSC, Inc. HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis F. 8: WCR 32 & Eastern Site Access 1/22/2007 K ` 4-- 4\ P Movement. : EBT EBR WBLi WBT NBL: NBR,' Lane Configurations '4 4 'Yr Sign Control Free Free Stop Grade 0% 0% 0% Volume(veh/h) 11 36 1 11 26 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate (vph) 12 39 1 12 28 1 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (fUs) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None ✓ Median storage veh) r'( Upstream signal (ft) pX, platoon unblocked vC, conflicting volume 51 46 32 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 51 46 32 tC, single(s) 4.1 6.4 6.2 t;S tC, 2 stage (s) tF(s) 2.2 s 3.5 3.3 • p0 queue free % 100 97 100 cM capacity(veh/h) 1555 964 1042 DIfiatiatc Lani#111EB`1 WB' NB,1 ,,, Volume Total 51 13 29 Volume Left 0 1 28 Volume Right 39 0 1 cSH 1700 1555 967 Volume to Capacity 0.03 0.00 0.03 Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 0 2 Control Delay(s) 0.0" ' 0.6 8.8 " Lane LOS A A L Approach Delay(s) 0.0 0.6 8.8 Approach LOS A Inte'rse ion Summaryt'15. Average Delay 2.9 Intersection Capacity Utilization ' 13.3% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 Iy Liberty Property(LSC#051470) 2010 PM Peak Total with improvements Page 5 LSC, Inc. } HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 1: WCR 32 & WCR 5 1/22/2007 Movement . EBL `EST EBB- WEL WBT WBR NBL . NBT NBR BBC SST `SBR Lane Configurations ', 4+ 4, 4+ Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% Volume (veh/h) 5 5 5 ' 43 6 14 5 271 41 29 267 5 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate (vph) 5 5 5 47 7 15 5 295 45 32 290 5 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) in Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None None n, Median storage veh) r Upstream signal (ft) e.a pX, platoon unblocked vC, conflicting volume 702 706 293 692 686 317 296 339 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2,stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 702 706 293 692 686 317 296 339 r tC, single (s) 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 4.1 4.1 tC, 2 stage (s) tF(s) 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3` 2.2 2:2 i<• p0 queue free % 98 98 99 86 98 98 100 97 cM capacity(veh/h) 333 350 746 343 359 724 1266 1220 Urtecfiin;'Larie# 'ES 1 WW1:-7,:NB,1 =;SB t . Volume Total 16 68 345 327 Volume Left 5 47 5 32 Volume Right 5 15 45 5 cSH 416 391 1266 1220 Volume to Capacity 0.04 0.18 0.00 " 0.03 &'4 Queue Length 95th (ft) 3 16 0 2 Control Delay(s) 14.0 16.2 0.2 1.0 r Lane LOS BC A A [5, Approach Delay(s) 14.0 16:2 0.2 1.0 Approach LOS B C lnters`i ctibh Summary` "' z Average Delay 2.3 Intersection Capacity Utilization 44.7% ICU Level of Service A ti Analysis Period (min) 15 • Liberty Property (LSC#051470) 2030 AM Peak Total with improvements Page 1 LSC, Inc. e-1 ` HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2: SH 66 & WCR 5 1/22/2007 jA -. 'c ♦- ti 4\ t /' `' l 1 Movement BBL EBT.' EBR WBL WBT WBR , NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR • Lane Configurations 11 tt r ) ikt r 'I 1+ 'I + r Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow(prot) 1770 3539 1583 1770 3539 1583 1770 1806 1770 1863 1583 Flt Permitted 0.33 1.00 1.00 0.33 1.00 1.00 0.58 1.00 0.52 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 615 3539 1583 615 3539 1583 1084 1806 962 1863 1583 F Volume(vph) 175 645 155 30 645 45 155 120 30 66 126 203 :k' Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow(vph) 190 701 168 33 701 49 168 130 33 72 137 221 {. RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 78 0 0 23 0 10 0 0 0 182 Lane Group Flow (vph) 190 701 90 33 701 26 168 153 0 72 137 39 Turn Type pm+pt Perm pm+pt Perm pm+pt pm+pt Perm Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 4 8 8 2 6 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 53.0 48.0 48.0 53.0 48.0 48.0 21.0 16.0 21.0 16.0 16.0 Effective Green, g (s) 53.0 48.0 48.0 53.0 48.0 48.0 21.0 16.0 21.0 16.0 16.0 • Actuated g/C Ratio 0.59 0.53 0.53 0.59 0.53 0.53 0.23 0.18 0.23 0.18 0.18 Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 426 1887 844 426 1887 844 291 321 269 331 281 v/s Ratio Prot c0.02 0.20 0.00 0.20 c0.03 0.08 0.01 0.07 v/s Ratio Perm c0.24 0.06 0.04 0.02 c0.10 0.05 0.02 v/c Ratio 0.45 0.37 0.11 0.08 0.37 0.03 0.58 0.48 0.27 0.41 0.14 Uniform Delay, dl 8.9 12.2 10.4 8.0 12.2 10.0 30.0 33.2 27.6 32.8 31.2 - Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 3.4 0.6 0.3 0.4 0,6 0.1 8.1 5.0 2.4 3.8 1.0 Delay(s) 12.2 12.8 10.6 8.4 12.8 10.0 38.1 38.3 30.1 36.6 32.2 Level of Service B BB A B ' B D D CDC Approach Delay(s) 12.3 12.4 38.2 33.3 Approach LOS B B D C Intersection Summary . _ . , _:: HCM Average Control Delay 19.1 HCM Level of Service B HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.48 .-: Actuated Cycle Length (s) 90.0 Sum of lost time(s) 16.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 56.1% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group 1. • Liberty Property (LSC#051470) 2030 AM Peak Total with improvements Page 2 LSC, Inc. r--...-: HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 5: South Site Access & WCR 5 1/22/2007 r Movement : VVBL ` WBR `,NBT NBR '..` SBL SBT ` a :;r, s.r,:-,:, Lane Configurations Y + 4 Sign Control Stop Free Free • Grade 0% 0% 0% Volume(veh/h) 57 6 316 24 3 338 • Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate (vph) 62 7 343 26 3 367 :. • Pedestrians ' Lane Width (ft) • . Walking Speed (ft/s) 1.4 Percent Blockage ' E::::,, Right turn flare (veh) Median type None t Median storage veh) t° Upstream signal (ft) �'' pX, platoon unblocked vC,conflicting volume 730 357 ' 370 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 730 357 370 tC, single(s) 6.4 6.2 . : 4.1 t.:: tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s) 3.5 3.3 2.2 v. p0 queue free% 84 99 100 r cM capacity(veh/h) 388 688 1189 Direction°Lane# WB 1. .NB i -:SB 1 .."-r,, y rr""�• 1 .... < .. ��` �~� •.w.` •:'5•k r ...4 :�`.'4^"":did h..,;�� Yf�k�.}�'tL,i Volume Total 68 370 371 Volume Left 62 0 3 Volume Right 7 26 0 ` .. cSH 405 1700 1189 Volume to Capacity 0.17 0.22 0.00 .:s Queue Length 95th (ft) 15 0 0 Control Delay(s) 15.7 0.0 0:1 T Lane LOS C A L Approach Delay(s) 15.7 0:0 0.1 . . Approach LOS C t IntersectiorVS,ummary f ' ` = ,u 1: • Average Delay 1.4 Intersection Capacity Utilization 30.4% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 v Y ti:� }w` Q Liberty Property (LSC#051470) `.>' 2030 AM Peak Total with.improvements Page 3 LSC, Inc. r' r ti HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 6: WCR 32 & Western Site Access 1/22/2007 " c 4_ 4\ /1" r" Movement EBT .' EBR 'WBL '.WBT�, NBL . NBR" Lane Configurations I 4 Sign Control Free Free Stop Grade 0% 0% 0% Volume(veh/h) 65 10 0 79 24 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate (vph) 71 11 0 86 26 1 Pedestrians t. Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s)PPercent Blockage `� Right turn flare (veh) Median type None 3 Median storage veh) ; Upstream signal (ft) .r pX, platoon unblocked vC, conflicting volume 82 162 76 -, vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 82 162 76 . tC, single (s) 4.1 6.4 6.2 ._`.. tC, 2 stage (s) • tF(s) 2.2 3.5 3.3 .: p0 queue free % 100 97 100 cM capacity(veh/h) 1516 829 985 . Direction,.Lat e# EB 1 ,WB 1 NB:1 y ..6.3?.,2}.:1 m�4•" = ';',46,::10'1,7";7,„ n' ; J" Volume Total 82 86 27 Volume Left 0 0 26 ` Volume Right 11 0 1 . cSH 1700 1516 834 Volume to Capacity 0.05 0.00 0.03 _ . Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 0 3 Control Delay(s) 0.0 0.0 9.5 Lane LOS A Approach Delay(s) 0.0 0.0 9.5 Approach LOS A Intersection Summary . , ` Average Delay 1.3 Intersection Capacity Utilization 14.2% ICU Level of Service A • Analysis Period (min) 15 Liberty Property (LSC#051470) 2030 AM Peak Total with improvements Page 4 LSC, Inc. HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis R 8: WCR 32 & Eastern Site Access 1/22/2007 S • . .. C T P 7' Movement.`.' EBT EBR_ WEL..'WET `` 'NEIL .NBR . " Lane Configurations '+ 4 l'Ir Sign Control Free Free Stop ' Grade 0% 0% 0% Volume(veh/h) 56 10 1 55 24 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate (vph) 61 11 1 60 26 1 Pedestrians Lane Width(ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) 11 Percent Blockage r Right turn flare(veh) Median type Nohe Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) p pX, platoon unblocked vC, conflicting volume 72 . 128 66 , vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol . . vCu, unblocked vol 72 128 66 ,, tC,single (s) 4.1 6.4 6.2 i t ( ) C, 2stage (s) tF 2.2 . .3.5. 3.3. p0 queue free % 100 97 100 cM capacity(veh/h) 1528 866 997 Direction; Lane.# . .EB 1:..`VVB 1,.:-.NB i Volume Total 72 61 27 .. Volume Left 0 1 26 Volume Right 11 0 1.: cSH 1700 1528 870 8 '- Volume to Capacity 0.04 0.00 0.03 r'Y Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 0 2 Control Delay(s) 0.0 0.1 ._'. 9.3 t:';i Lane LOS A A L Approach Delay(s) 0.0 0.1 9.3 Approach LOS A .- InersectionISummary _= ` r .;:. k .- Average Delay r Y, �: a aY 1.6 Intersection Capacity Utilization 13.7% • ICU Level of service A Analysis Period (min) 15 L. Liberty Property(LSC#051470) i. 2030 AM Peak Total with improvements Page 5 LSC, Inc. `1 HCM Unsignalized intersection Capacity Analysis 1: WCR 32 & WCR 5 1/22/2007 Movement : .EBL, `.E T EBR WBL WST 'WBR``''Nt l_ NBT NBR >$ !r` :'S T SBR Lane Configurations Sign Control :Stop' : Stop free Pre p:, Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% Volume(veh/h) 5 11 6 49 11' 15:: 6.'., .. 337 89 44.: ::339: 5 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate(vph) 5 12 7. 53 12 : 16 7 366 97 48 .368 5 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage • . Right turn flare (veh) Median type : None None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) pX, platoon unblocked vC, conflicting volume 917 943 371 907 897 . 415 374 .. .463 G',`• vC1, stage 1 conf_vol vC2',stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 917 943 371 907 897 415 374 463 tC,:single(s) 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 .4,1 . 4.1 • tC, 2 stage (s) 3.5: 4.0 3.3 .3.5. 4:0 , 3.3. -;2.2: .. 2.2 p0 queue free % 98 95 99 77 95 97 99 96 cM capacity(veh/h) • 229 :. 250 675 236 266 638 • 1185 1098 EQ.;17WB 1` NB 1 S8 Volume Total' 24 82 470 422 ' . • Volume Left 5 53 7 48 • Volume.Right. :: 7 16:. : . ::97 5.. cSH 294 275 1185 1098 1.s �.� Volume to Capacity 0:08. .0:30 .° 0.01 0.04 • d s Queue Length 95th (ft) 7 30 0 3 Control Delay(s) : 18:3 : 23.5 0.2 1.4 Lane LOS C C A A Approach.Delay(s) 18.3 23:5: • 0.2 ::.11.A Approach LOS C C ._. ........ ...:.:f;;::..-.. •.:K err§ :� xr. .,:-, - a.. Intersio Emma - - -- - ., Average Delay 3.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 61.3% ICU Level of Service Analysis Period (min) 15 • r4 1"• • Liberty Property (l_SC#051470) 2030 PM Peak Total with,improvements Page 1 LSC, Inc. 11 ' HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2: SH 66 & WCR 5 1/22/2007 s -Nit r F- t 4\ t / `► 1 d Movement EBL EBT EBR WBE.7.WBT WBR NBL NBT • NBR SBL ' SBT' rSBR Lane Configurations ili t r 'i ft r ) vi t r Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 `1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 - Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 "1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 ; 1.00 Frt 1.00 - 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00' 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1:00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 3539 1583 1770 3539 1583 1770 1813 1770 1863 1583 Flt Permitted 0.25 1.00 1.00 0.25 < 1.00 1.00 0.49 1.00 0.39 1:00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 469 3539 1583 469 3539 1583 920 1813 723 1863 1583 Volume (vph) 264 810 190 35 810 91 190 163 35 77 158 ` 245 l Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow(vph) 287 880 207 38 880 99 207 177 38 84 - 172 266 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 97 0 0 46 0 8 0 0 0 173 r Lane Group Flow(vph) 287 880 110 38 880 53 207 207 0 84 172 93 Turn Type pm+pt Perm pm+pt Perm pm+pt pm+pt Perm Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 4 8 8 2 6 6 Actuated Green, G'(s) 53.0 48.0 48.0 53.0 48.0 48.0 21:0 16.0 21.0 16.0 16.0 Effective Green, g (s) 53.0 48.0 48.0 53.0 48.0 48.0 21.0 16.0 21.0 16.0 16.0 1. Actuated g/C Ratio 0.59 0.53 0.53 0.59 0.53 0.53 0.23 0.18 0.23 0.18 0.18 , Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 348 1887 844 348 1887 844 262 322 227 331 281 v/s Ratio Prot c0.05 0.25 0.01 0.25 c0.04 0.11 0.02 0.09 v/s Ratio Perm c0.44 0.07 0.06. 0.03 c0,14 0.07 0.06 v/c Ratio 0.82 0.47 0.13 0.11 0.47 0.06 0.79 0.64 0.37 0.52 0.33 Uniform Delay, dl 13.3, 13.0 10.5 8.4 13:0 10.1 32,1 34:3 28.0 33.5 32:3 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 19.5 0.8 0.3 0.6 0.8 0.1 21.1 9.5 ` 4.6 5.7 ' 3:1 Delay (s) 32.8 13.9 10.9 9.1 13.9 10.3 53.2 43.8 32.6 39.2 35.4 • Level of Service C B B A B B D D CDD Approach Delay (s) 17.4 13.3 48.4 36.2 Approach LOS B B D_r D e' Infeisectiori'.Summary 'e _ HCM Average Control Delay 23.0 s HCM Level of Service C HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.81 • Actuated Cycle Length (s) 90.0 Sum of lost time(s) 16:0 P Intersection Capacity Utilization 69.2% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 • c Critical Lane Group • Liberty Property (LSC#051470) 2030 PM Peak Total with,improvements Page 2 LSC, Inc. FHCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2: SH 66 & WCR 5 1/22/2007 r --. Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL 'WBT WBR NBL NBT'` NBR SBL . SBT `''SBR Lane Configurations ill tT r vi tT r 'I Ta 'I + 1 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 190O 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 _ Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 • Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prat) 1770 3539 1583 1770 3539 1583 1770 1813 1770 1863 1583 Flt Permitted 0.25 1.00 1.00 0.25 1.00 1.00 0.49 1.00 0.39 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 469 3539 1583 469 3539 1583 920 1813 723 1863 1583 t' Volume (vph) 264 810 190 35 810 91 190 163 35 77 158 245 I Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow(vph) 287 880 207 38 880 99 207 177 38 84 172 266 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 97 0 0 46 0 8 0 0 0 173 Lane Group Flow(vph) 287 880 110 38 880 53 207 207 0 84 172 93 ' ' Turn Type pm+pt Perm pm+pt Perm pm+pt pm+pt Perm Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 4 8 8 2 6 6 • Actuated Green, G (s) 53.0 48.0 48.0 53.0 48.0 48.0 21.0 16.0 21.0 16.0 16.0 Effective Green, g (s) 53.0 48.0 48.0 53.0 48.0 48.0 21.0 16.0 21.0 16.0 16.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.59 0.53 0.53 0.59 0.53 0.53 0.23 0.18 0.23 0.18 0.18 Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 348 1887 844 348 1887 844 262 322 227 331 281 • v/s Ratio Prot c0.05 0.25 0.01 0.25 c0.04 0.11 0.02 0.09 t v/s Ratio Perm c0.44 0.07 0.06 0.03 c0.14 0.07 0.06 v/c Ratio 0.82 0.47 0.13 0.11 0.47 0.06 0.79 0.64 0.37 0.52 0.33 Uniform Delay, dl 13.3 13.0 10.5 8.4 13.0 10.1 32.1 34.3 28.0 33.5 32.3 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ••• Incremental Delay, d2 19.5 0.8 0.3 0.6 0.8 0.1 '21.1 9.5 4.6 5.7 3.1 Delay(s) 32.8 13.9 10.9 9.1 13.9 10.3 53.2 43.8 32.6 39.2 35.4 Level of Service C B B A B S D D C D D _ Approach Delay (s) 17.4 13.3 48.4 36.2 Approach LOS B B D D infersection.Summary L HCM Average Control Delay 23.0 HCM Level of Service C HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.81 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 90.0 Sum of lost time (s) 16.0 a _ Intersection Capacity Utilization 69.2% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 . c Critical Lane Group • • Liberty Property (LSC#051470) 2030 PM Peak Total with improvements Page 2 LSC, Inc. HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 6: WCR 32 & Western Portion Access 1/22/2007 '> C `r p Movement EBT EBR `WBL WBT NBL O R r Lane Configurations 4 'V Sign Control Free Free Stop Grade 0% 0% 0% Volume (veh/h) 112 37 1 103 28 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate (vph) 122 40 1 112 30 1 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (fUs) Percent Blockage i Right turn flare (veh) Median type None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) pX, platoon unblocked vC, conflicting volume 162 256 142 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 162 256 142 tC, single (s) 4.1 6.4 6.2 tC, 2 stage (s) tF(s) 2.2 3.5 3.3 p0 queue free % 100 96 100 cM capacity(veh/h) 1417 732 906 • Direction, Lane# "r EB 1 WE 1 NBA a . ; Volume Total 162 113 32 Volume Left 0 1 30 Volume Right, 40 0 1 cSH 1700 1417 737 Volume to Capacity 0.10 0.00 0.04 i. Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 0 3 Control Delay(s) 0.0 0.1 10.1 Lane LOS A B Approach Delay(s) 0.0 0.1 10.1 Approach LOS B lnterseetirin Summary 4,y Average Delay 1.1 Intersection Capacity Utilization 18.1% ICU.Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 Liberty Property (LSC#051470) 2030 PM Peak Total with,improvements Page 4 LSC, Inc. 1,1 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis • 8: WCR 32 & Eastern Portion Access 1/22/2007 l \ / • Moved enf EST EBR WBL Wet NBL NBR Lane Configurations I+ 4 V Sign Control Free Free Stop Grade 0% 0% 0% Volume (veh/h) 76 37 2 76 28 2 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate (vph) 83 40 2 83 30 2 Pedestrians • Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) r Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None �? Median storage veh) F• Upstream signal (ft) pX, platoon unblocked vC, conflicting volume 123 190 103 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 123 190 103 tC, single (s) 4.1 6.4 6.2 tC, 2 stage (s) tF(s) 2.2 3.5 3.3 E , p0 queue free % 100 96 100 cM capacity(veh/h) 1464 798 952 btrectiah" Lane# Eb 1 WB 1 ' ;NB i,. Volume Total 123 85 33 f`; Volume Left 0 2 30 Volume Right 40 0 2 cSH 1700 1464 807 Volume to Capacity 0.07 0.00 0.04' Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 0 3 Control Delay(s) 0.0 0.2 9.6 r Lane LOS A A Li Approach Delay(s) 0.0 0.2 9.6 Approach LOS A Intersection summary Average Delay 1.4 Intersection Capacity Utilization 16:3% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 a'r • Liberty Property (LSC#051470) • 2030 PM Peak Total with improvements Page 5 LSC, Inc. r r 4 PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION FOR NW 1/4, SECTION 21, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 68 WEST, OF THE 6TH P.M. WELD COUNTY, COLORADO Prepared For: Liberty Properties, LLLC P.O. Box 10 Mead, Colorado 80542 April 29, 2005 Project No. LIBERP-5D7H-01-709A1 LANDMARK ENGINEERING LTD. 3521 W. EISENHOWER BLVD. LOVELAND, CO 80537 fr LandMa ■■ ENGINEERING Ltd. Engineers • Planners • Surveyors • Architects • Geotechnical April 29, 2005 Project No. LIBERP-5O7H-01-709A1 Liberty Properties, LLLC P.O. Box 10 Mead, Colorado 80542 ii f"•, Gentlemen: The enclosed report presents the results of a preliminarygeotechnical investigation for the NW 1/4, Section 21, Township 3 North, Range 68 West of the 61h P.M., Weld County, Colorado. If you have any questions or if we can be of further assistance, please contact our office as soon as possible. Sincerely, Landmark Engineering Ltd. -�r ` t Larry filler ` Geol gist L /tv �� , 4J � 4r- v Enclosure '1`)? ih177 4 The above has been reviewed and approved under the direct supervision of Wayh G..Tho4tp` Colorado P.E. 35177. , " ' 3521 West 1: isenh n ,rer Boulevard and Loveland .land , Colorado 80537 Loveland (9701667 6186 Fur (970) 667-6298 Metro ( 303) 6'9-71?J TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Letter of Transmittal Table of Contents II Scope 1 Site Location and Description 1 Field Investigation 1 Laboratory Testing 2 Subsurface Conditions 2 Foundation Recommendations 3 Floor Slabs 7 Basements 9 Site Grading, Landscaping and Drainage 9 Flexible Pavement Thickness Design 10 General Information 12 Location of Borings Plate 1 Legend of Soils and Rock Symbols Plate 2 Boring Logs Plates 3 - 14 Consolidation - Swell Tests Drawings 1 -7 Suggested Specifications For Placement of Compacted Earth Fills and/or Backfills Appendix A Flexible Pavement Calculations Appendix B Ft, SCOPE • The following report presents the results of a geotechnical investigation for NW 1/4, Section 21, Township 3 North, Range 68 West of the 6`" P.M., Weld County, Colorado. The investigation was performed for Liberty Properties LLLC. The purpose of this investigation was to obtain the technical information and subsurface property data necessary for the preliminary design and construction of foundation systems for the proposed residential development. The conclusions and recommendations presented in this report are based upon analysis of field and laboratory data and experience with similar subsurface conditions in the general vicinity. SITE DESCRIPTION The 160± acre site is located southwest of Mead at the Southeast corner of Weld County Roads 5 & 32. The parcel is presently farmed with the east half cultivated in wheat and the west half to be planted with corn. Topographically, the site generally slopes slightly to the south @ 1 - 2% ±. FIELD INVESTIGATION The field investigation consisted of 12 borings at selected locations on the site. The borings were advanced with an Acker AD-11 drill rig utilizing 4-inch diameter continuous flight augers. As the boring operation advanced, an index of soils relative density and consistency was obtained by use of the standard penetration test, ASTM Standard Test D-1586, The penetration test results listed on the boring logs are the number of blows required to drive 1 • the 2-inch diameter split-spoon sampler 12 inches, or increments as shown, into undisturbed soil using a 140-pound hammer dropped 30 inches. Undisturbed samples for use in the laboratory were taken in 3-inch O.D. thin wall Shelby samplers, hydraulically pushed into the soil and 2.5-inch O.D. California Samplers driven into the soil. Undisturbed and disturbed samples were sealed in the field and preserved at natural moisture content until tested in the laboratory. Complete logs of the boring operation are shown on the attached plates and include visual classifications of each soil, location of subsurface changes, standard penetration test results, and subsurface water level measurements at the time of this investigation. LABORATORY TESTING Laboratory tests were performed to determine visual classification, moisture contents, dry densities, swelling and consolidation characteristics, plasticity, gradation and soluble sulfates. SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS Subsurface strata were relatively uniform over the site, consisting of overburden lean clay soil underlain with a sandy claystone/clayey sandstone bedrock of the Pierre Shale Formation of the Cretaceous Age. A description of each follows. Lean Clay-At the surface in all borings and extending to depths ranging from 5 to 10 feet, a lean clay with sand soil was encountered. Based on field and laboratory data collected, this material offers low to very low bearing capacities in its current, moist-wet state. These soils tend to consolidate or swell slightly when subjected to a 500 p.s.f wet surcharge. 2 r Sandy Claystone/Clayey Sandstone - Below the overburden soils a weathered turning to competent interbedded sandy claystone poorly cemented clayey sandstone bedrock was found. Tests suggest this stratum offers moderate to high bearing capacities while exhibiting low to moderate swell potential. The low swell potentials were noted in the sandstone layers while the claystone possess the moderate swell values. Groundwater- At the time of this investigation and 24 hours later, free groundwater was encountered in all borings at depths ranging from 4'-10" to 12'-0". These water levels should be anticipated to fluctuate throughout the year, and therefore, may not be indicative of high groundwater levels. It appears, for the most part, that a perched water table exists on top of the impervious bedrock stratum. It is our professional opinion that the current groundwater levels are contributed to and charged by localized irrigation. it is possible that if irrigation ceases on the site, the groundwater levels could drop. Also, cut-off subdrain systems employed around the parcel could intercept groundwater from adjacent irrigated fields. FOUNDATION RECOMMENDATIONS The selection of the foundation type for a given situation and structure is governed by 2 basic considerations. First, the foundation elements must be designed to be safe against shear failure in the underlying soils and/or bedrock; and second, differential settlement or other vertical movement of the foundation must be reduced to a reasonable level. Two basic methods are available to us in selecting the foundation type and allowable loads. These are the standard penetration test and consolidation-swell testing. Ultimately, the bearing capacity of the foundation soil depends upon the size and shape of the foundation element, the depth below the surface, and the physical characteristics of the supporting soil or bedrock. 3 Continuous Spread Footing Foundations r-. Where the foundation will be placed on the natural undisturbed lean clay with sand soils, # I and at least 3 feet above the sandy claystone/clayey sandstone bedrock, the foundation could be a continuous spread footing foundation designed for a maximum allowable a bearing capacity range of 500- 1250 pounds per square foot (dead load plus half live load) and a minimum dead load range of 0 - 400 pounds per square foot to help counteract swelling should the subsoils become wetted. All footings should be placed a minimum of } 30 inches below finished grade for frost protection. Foundation walls should be reinforced with rebar to span an unsupported length of 10 feet or as required by the Foundation Engineer. Splicing and placement should comply with ACI 318, ACI 332, or as required by the Foundation Engineer. Drilled Pier (Caisson) and Grade Beam Foundations As an alternative or where the bottom of the foundation is to be placed within 3 feet of the sandy claystone/clayey sandstone bedrock, the foundation could be a drilled pier(caisson) and grade beam foundation. The piers should be designed for a maximum end bearing of 16,000 pounds per square foot (dead load plus half live load), and side shear of 1,600 pounds per square foot for that portion bearing in the firm competent sandy c/aystone/clayey sandstone bedrock. Foundations should be designed and spaced such that a minimum load of 6,000 pounds is achieved on each pier to counteract uplift due to the swell pressure exerted in the zone of moisture variation. Difficulty is sometimes experienced in achieving the desired minimum load using dead load alone. Therefore, one half the side shear value given above maybe used to resist uplift, provided the sides of the hole are grooved or roughened in the firm competent bedrock. This roughening should occur in the lower 8 feet of the drilled pier. 4 In drilling the piers the following design and construction details should be observed. - i 1. Piers should be designed for the maximum end bearing pressure and side shear _ I specified in this report. 2. All piers should be designed for the minimum dead load pressure specified in this report. 3. All piers should penetrate a minimum of 8 feet into the firm bedrock stratum, with a minimum length of 18 feet and a minimum diameter of 10 or 12 inches. 4. All piers should be reinforced for their full length to resist tension. We recommend the use of at least a quantity of 2, Grade 60, No. 5 reinforcing bars for 12-inch diameter piers. For larger piers the area of reinforcing shall be equal to or greater than 0.5 percent of the gross cross-sectional area of the pier; or as required by the foundation engineer. 5. A 4-inch minimum void space should beprovided beneath p all grade beams between piers to ensure the concentration of dead load pressure on the piers. 6. All piers should be carefully cleaned and dewatered before placing concrete. In our opinion, casing and/or dewatering probably will be required. Concrete and reinforcing steel should be placed in the caisson holes immediately after drilling, • cleaning and dewatering. 7. Most of the bedrock at the site can be drilled with a normal heavy commercial sized pier drilling rig. Some of the bedrock is very hard and problems may arise if the contractor attempts to drill the pier holes with a small drill rig. In case drilling refusal is encountered, the depth of penetration into bedrock may be reduced if design criteria are adjusted accordingly. 5 •tT � f 8. Pier holes should be observed during construction by a competent Soils Engineer or technician to ensure that penetration is started at the proper depth and no loose material remains in the holes. Steel Helical Pier and Grade Beam As an alternative to a drilled pier(caisson) and grade beam foundation, a steel helical pier and grade beam may be a viable option. The helical pier should be an 8-inch single helix designed for a total minimum load capacity of 20,000 pounds. All piers should bear into , the interlayered sandstone/sandstone bedrock. All other manufacturers installation guidelines and specifications should be followed. The following requirements should be followed in the design of the foundation system: 1. All footings, pads, caissons, or helical piers should bear on or in the same type of soil or bedrock. Foundation elements and concrete floorslabs should not be placed on frozen ground, topsoil, or inadequately compacted or unsuitable fill material. 2. All below grade habitable space should be protected by a properly installed perimeter subdrain system around the exterior of the foundation. Crawl spaces should also be protected with a subdrain system if ground water or site grading conditions warrant installation. 3. Partition walls should not be placed directly on concrete floorslabs. They should be suspended from the floor joists or roof assembly, or other approved methods that will allow the slab to move vertically, unimpaired for a minimum vertical distance of 2 inches. Foundation elements shall be provided for all bearing walls. Bearing • walls should be isolated from the remaining concrete floor slab. 6 t. 4. Based on the presence of soluble sulfates, a Type I- II or Type II cement should be used for all concrete exposed to the soils or bedrock. 5. The bottom of all foundation components (except piers) should be placed at least 3 feet above subsurface water levels. 6. The completed open excavation should be observed by an experienced Soils Engineer or technician, to confirm the subsurface conditions described in this report and observe any variations which may affect construction at the site. FLOOR SLABS Below, we have provided the following table provided by the Colorado Association of Geotechnical Engineers in their December 1996 report entitled, Guidelines for Slab Performance Risk Evaluation and Residential Basement Floor System Recommendations. This table can be used to evaluate potential slab risk with varying swell percentages. It should be noted that all of our swell tests were performed using a 500 p.s.f. surcharge. RECOMMENDED REPRESENTATIVE SWELL POTENTIAL DESCRIPTIONS AND CORRESPONDING SLAB PERFORMANCE RISK CATEGORIES Slab Performance Representative Representative Risk Category Percent Swell Percent Swell (500 psf Surcharge) (1000 psf Surcharge) Low 0to <3 0to <2 Moderate 3 to <5 2 to <4 High 5 to <8 4 to <6 Very High z 8 z 6 7 Note: The representative percent swell values presented are not necessarily measured ry.! values; rather, they are a judgement of the swell of the soil and bedrock profile likely to influence slab performance. Based on our testing of the encountered materials, swell results fall within the low risk slab performance category. However, slab movements up to a few inches is still possible if subgrade soils become saturated. Therefore, we advise that a structural floor system with a void beneath it be utilized if movement cannot be tolerated. However, the cost of these systems may be prohibitive. Therefore, with the owner/builder recognizing and taking responsibility for risks involved, a floating floor slab bearing on the native materials may be a reasonable option. K•ot If a floating slab option is pursued, it should be constructed to be "free-floating,"isolated from all bearing members, utilities, and partition walls, door frames, cabinets, etc., so that the slab can move unimpaired without producing architectural or structural damage. Slabs should be underlain with a 4-inch layer of washed rock to help distribute floor loads, provide a capillary break, and provide a pathway for potential infiltrating water to be Y• directed toward sump areas. If moisture sensitive floor coverings are used on interior slabs, consideration should be given to the use of barriers to minimize moisture rise o ; through the slab. Positive drainage should be provided for the excavation subgrade to prevent pooling of water beneath the slab. At a minimum, concrete floor slabs should be reinforced with 6" x 6" - W1.4 x W1.4 wire fabric, or equivalent. The slabs should be jointed to a depth of at least 1/4 of the slab thickness in dimensions not to exceed 15 feet K`? or 225 square feet and at areas of potential cracking. Exterior slabs exposed to de-icing chemicals or extreme weathering should be constructed using Type If cement with higher air contents. 8 BASEMENTS ra , Based on current groundwater levels, basement construction is not deemed feasible at the site. However, it may be possible to lower the water table by installing subdrains or by discontinuing flood irrigation on the site. Any basement type construction should be placed a minimum of 3'above high groundwater levels. Also, we do require that all below grade habitable space be protected with a perimeter drain system. tr ii SITE GRADING, LANDSCAPING & DRAINAGE Every precaution should be taken to prevent wetting of the foundation subsoils and/or bed rock and the percolation of water in the backfill zone or other areas that may reach the foundation or slab elements. Water infiltrating near the foundation may result in architectural or structural damage due to consolidating or swelling of the subsoils and/or bedrock. Backfill around the outside perimeter of the structure should be compacted at optimum moisture, or above, and to at least 90 percent of Standard Proctor Density as determined by ASTM Standard Test D-698. A suggested specification for placement of backfills is included as Appendix A. Backfill material should be relatively impervious and non-swelling. The backfill should be free of frozen soil, large dried clods, and organic matter. Backfilling should only be accomplished when concrete strength and adequate support to foundation walls are applied and acceptable to the Foundation Engineer. It is �:. our opinion that the natural soils at the site could be used for backfill material. Finished grades should be sloped away from the structure on all sides to provide positive drainage. A minimum of 6 inches fall in the first 10 feet is required. However, we recommend 12 inches of fall. The fall should be maintained throughout the life of the structure. Sprinkling systems should not be installed or direct water to within 10 feet of the structure. Downspouts with extensions are recommended and should be arranged to carry drainage from the roof at least 5 feet beyond the foundation walls and backfill zone. Should landscaping plants be located next to the structure, we recommend the installation of plants that require minimal watering. 9 f FLEXIBLE PAVEMENT THICKNESS DESIGN Trt In conjunction with the subsurface soil investigation, this office also performed a �<•„ preliminary flexible pavement thickness design for proposed streets within the subdivision. • We have provided design options for local and collector type streets. These designs have been performed in accordance with the A.A.S.H.T.O. Guide For •^. Design of Pavement Structures, 1993 software. Combined subgrade samples revealeda corrected R Value of 5 or less. Using this figure along with an EDLA of 5 and 25 for local and collector streets respectively, structural numbers of 2.29 and 2.97 were calculated, (see worksheets, Appendix B). The following table provides preliminary flexible pavement thickness designs. Hot Aggregate Base Bituminous Course Total Section Pavement Option A 3-1/2" 8" 11.5" Local Street Option B 4" 6" 10" Option A 4-1/2" 9" 13.5" Collector Street Option B 5" 7" 12" Flexible Pavement Construction Recommendations Experience has shown that construction methods can have a significant effect of the life and serviceability of a pavement system. We recommend the proposed pavement to be constructed in the following manner: 10 1. The subgrade should be stripped of existing organics, scarified to 6", moisture treated, and compacted. Soils should be moisture treated to between -2 and +2 percent of optimum moisture content and compacted to a least 95 percent of maximum standard Proctor dry density (ASTM D 698, AASHTO T 95). 2. Utility trenches and all subsequently placed fill should be properly compacted and tested prior to paving. As a minimum, fill should be compacted. to 95 percent of maximum standard Proctor dry density. All fill should be approved by the engineer prior to placing. 3. After final subgrade elevation has been reached and the subgrade compacted, the area should be proof-rolled with a heavy pneumatic-tired vehicle (i.e. a loaded 10- wheel dump truck.) Subgrade that is pumping or deforming excessively should be scarified, moisture conditioned and recompacted. 4. In areas where soft or wet subgrade is encountered, the material should be subexcavated and replaced with properly compacted structural backfill. Where extensively soft, yielding subgrade is encountered, we recommend the excavation be inspected by a representative of our office. Soil stabilization methods, including fly ash or geotextile fabric, may be necessary. 5. Aggregate base course meeting C.D.O.T. Class 5 or 6, should be laid in thin, loose lifts, moisture treated near optimum moisture content, and compacted to at least 95 percent of standard Proctor dry density (ASTM D 698, AASHTO T 99). 6. Hot Bituminous Pavement should be hot plant-mixed material compacted to mix design specifications. The mix temperature at laydown time should be near 235 degrees F or at mix design recommendations. The maximum compacted lift should be 3.0 inches, and joints should be staggered. 11 trj 7. The subgrade preparation and the placement and compaction of all pavement material should be observed and tested. Compaction criteria should be met prior to the placement of the next paving lift. The additional requirements of Weld County, Colorado or Colorado Department of Transportation Specifications Manual should apply. GENERAL INFORMATION The data presented herein were collected to help develop preliminary designs and cost estimates for this project. Professional judgements on design alternatives and criteria are presented in this report. These are based on evaluation of technical information gathered, partly on our understanding of the characteristics of the proposed residential subdivision, and partly on our experience with subsurface conditions in the area. We do not guarantee the performance of the project in any respect, only that our engineering work and judgements rendered meet the standard of care of our profession. The test holes drilled were spaced to obtain a reasonably accurate picture of subsurface conditions for preliminary design purposes. Variations from the conditions portrayed frequently occur. Therefore, additional site specific soil borings may be required and may necessitate modification or design. We recommend that construction be continuously observed by a qualified soils technician, trained and experienced in the field to take advantage of all opportunities to recognize different conditions and minimize the risk of having some undetected condition which might affect the performance of the foundation elements. 12 r E" 1 I i i WELD COUNTY 1{0140 N•.32 �uNrs,f/rerc.� swYyf sc.is i .. ' 1 ��—_•' 70' Rlw___J 1'N.8? 2 3,17 —• "t' • w ,11U� M,UMI wJl �' ft Ifl1 RYIYtN 1 rl ti� 401131_1 ; �� $ �wFrcA uN(uNY•N•!Rwrw e.Laua•v+w+�_ i Z637,36 -4. .. cloos al. .I .1l El W. 1I 4. O II • i h Cm • — , B1 elD11-2 +B-3. �~, I ,...,414.:1,,‘:)N.:8, M e.p J •t .i. IY -•�•t b•1 TDr 1A •P 4. Z N g o C B-4 • B-5 (i0B-6 o >. NW jq SEC. 2 ' o: \".. 3 O AREA 4 V 158.19 Ac,E5 111 I x r 2 o w E k 4:—..? Is ..1 ‘,.., f1/4.giii,B-9 i z B-8IlD ea ? \'''';*- v i 1 ' 4., w b x a a r• !v • 'C-5."... • P .. ' o B-10 .B-11 B-12 8 i o 2 • u. e •it 3. 83'23'115"W uNf NW�Iq![L.Li Il•c,f1 s. E7.23'9S"w 1591.57' Soo;' _ PLATE 1 ��l�r,rfTTl�rc�re CLIENT: Zeek Partnership LLLP/Liberty Properties �jJ�J rneamcriz ®Let _ TITLE: Soil Boring Site Plan ---I4GINEERS/ARCHITECTS/PLANNERS/SURVEYORS 3521 W. i Elrinhowlr 111vd., Loveland. Colorado x0537 PROJECT NUMBER: ZEEKLI-5D711-01-709A1 ( 70) 661-626 D�nv�r (30 3) 629-7121 fox (970) 667-6298 DATE: April 29, 2005 I SCALE: 1"=400t± 1 F'_ LEGEND OF SOIL AND ROCK SYMBOLS ••: '• FILL MATERIAL Depth Below ..•. Surface roo GRAVELS (GW,GP, GM,GC) DY•e; SANDS(SW,SPSM,SC) Water Level �: � 5 After 24 Hours ._.. • P, \ � SILTS ( ML,MH ) � ` �� CLAYS (CL,CH,OL,OH ) R. NNN '""'"' ORGANICS `10 • Shelby Thin-walled Sampler rVN.v WEATHERED BEDROCK • .7";:.47 • Split-spoon Sampler * • CLAYSTONE & SHALE \`; California Sampler 15 `. = SILTSTONE • • it-ti= SANDST0NE • �`.\ ' Bag Sample L,1. LIMESTONE 20 .\V. . , , IGNEOUS/ METAMORPHIC \ � • . ROCKS a4_ SYMBOLS COMBINED * Split-spoon sample utilizes a TO REPRESENT SOIL 140lb. hammer dropping 30", MIXTURES Recording number of blows Example: per 12" or partial increment. hSILTY CLAY (AST"M D1586) ��al GRAVELLY CLAY ��LEffi1LuuIE1UG C IA100 �EMOH �c Lqa PLATE � NUMBER ENGINEERS/ARCHITECTS/PLANNERS/SURVEYORS/GE0TECHNICAL 3521 West Eisenhower Blvd., Loveland, Colorado 80537 2 (970) 667-6286 Denver (303) 629-7124 Fax (970) 667-6298 { LOG OF BORING BORING NO. CLIENT: Zeek Partnership LLLP/Liberty Prop. DRILL RIG: Acker AD-II I • PROJECT NO: ZEEKLI-5D7H-01-709A1 ROD SIZE: AW PROJECT LOCATION: NW 1/4, Sec. 21, T3N, METHOD OF DRILLING: 4"s.s. R68W,Weld County, Colorado DRILLER: LAM DATE DRILLED: April 26, 2005&April 27,2005 ENGINEER/GEOLOGIST: LAM ELEVATION: 5038.6' WEATHER: J W DESCRIPTION -' z REMARKS m ii W Q ^ o_ 2>- < a < O ti Z ix 0 co co (/) O 0 .\\LI lean clay with sand,soft very soft, moist-v. moist, brown-It. brown CL 26.1 90.9 - s" - \ 3/12 -5- v. moist-wet _ \a 9 water @ 5'-5" • - T 30/12 13.3 -10- - sandy daystone, hard-very hard, _ moist, tan-gray with iron staining - 15- _ 50/7 . . 12.7 119.3 - • -20-• -25- -30- -35- -40- PLATE 3 - Landmairk ENGINEERING LTD. LOG OF BORING BORING NO. CLIENT: Zeek Partnership LLLP/Liberty Prop. DRILL RIG: Acker AD-II 2 PROJECT NO: ZEEKLI-5D7H-01-709A1 ROD SIZE: AW PROJECT LOCATION: NW 1/4, Sec.21, T3N, METHOD OF DRILLING: 4" s.s. R68W,Weld County,Colorado DRILLER: LAM DATE DRILLED: April 26, 2005 8 April 27,2005 ENGINEER/GEOLOGIST: LAM ELEVATION: 5035.5 WEATHER: to o f DESCRIPTION a z w REMARKS ►- m n. w o Cl) Cl) CO 5 O 2 O m lean clay with sand,soft-very soft, -#200= 78% r - moist-v. moist, brown-It.brown CL 216 99.4 L.L.= 36 \ 2/14 v. moist-wet P.I.= 18 -5- � water @ 5'-0" -10- LJi 15/12 23.9 sandy claystone/clayey sandstone, poorly cemented, -15- --. hard-very hard,moist, tan-gray with iron staining -20- ---1 50/7 - 13.5 -25- -30- -35- -40- PLATE 4 Landmark ENGINEERING LTD. t•t' r LOG OF BORING BORING NO. CLIENT: Zeek Partnership LLLP/Liberty Prop. DRILL RIG: Acker AD-II 3 PROJECT NO: ZEEKLI-5O7H-01-709A1 ROD SIZE: AW PROJECT LOCATION: NW 1/4, Sec.21,T3N, METHOD OF DRILLING: 4" s.s. R68W,Weld County, Colorado DRILLER: LAM DATE DRILLED: April 26,2005 8.April 27,2005 ENGINEER/GEOLOGIST: LAM ELEVATION: 5031 .9 t WEATHER:Wu r > • w DESCRIPTION cr z REMARKS CO Q. w 1-- U 0.." W >- Q a V Q) o oO c E� a co co CO `y OO9. - lean clay with sand,very soft, \I 1/18 moist-v. moist, brown-It. brown CL 33.3 v. moist-wet -5- \ water @ 4'-10" \I.1/12 28.2 -10- —� - silty claystone sI.sandy, hard, -15- 501-12... moist,tan-oray_with iron staining,_- 16.9 114.1 { -20- -25- -30- „._ -35- -40- PLATE 5 v CLaadmarh ENGINEERING LTD. ., LOG OF BORING BORING r. NO. CLIENT: Zeek Partnership LLLP/Liberty Prop. DRILL RIG: Acker AD-II 4 _ PROJECT NO: ZEEKLI-5O71 -01-709A1 ROD SIZE: AW PROJECT LOCATION: NW 1/4, Sec.21,T3N, METHOD OF DRILLING: 4" s.s. R68W,Weld County, Colorado DRILLER: LAM DATE DRILLED: April 26, 2005&April 27,2005 ENGINEER/GEOLOGIST: LAM ELEVATION: 5026.6 t WEATHER: -J w > _.1w DESCRIPTION cc z Z REMARKS m d W M LL a M I- 0 ~ O O V Z >- g O CO CO c a n n < 2v Oa lean clay with sand, med. slift- soft, moist, brown-It.brown CL Frfl - \�8/12 23.6 - . ' -5- v. moist-wet - — _.— a. - .�� • -- water @ 6'-8" - - --., 15.6 115.0 - - -4—!33/12 -10- - - sandy-very sandy claystone, - - - moist, tan-gray with iron staining - -15- - - '• I - - `� . -20- 1 50/7_. . .. _ 15.7 - Ks l - i - - -25- - I - - -30- - Fr, -35- _ s. . -40- - PLATE 6 - I Landmark ENGINEERING LTD. r . LOG OF BORING BORING NO. CLIENT: Zeek Partnership LLLP/Liberty Prop. DRILL RIG: Acker AD-II 5 PROJECT NO: ZEEKLI-5D7H-01-709A1 ROD SIZE: AW PROJECT LOCATION: NW 1/4, Sec. 21,T3N, METHOD OF DRILLING: 4" s.s. R68W,Weld County, Colorado DRILLER: LAM DATE DRILLED: April 26, 2005 &April 27,2005 ENGINEER/GEOLOGIST: LAM ELEVATION: 5 029.5 WEATHER: • -J """ LL1 1-. `% w DESCRIPTION -' z Z REMARKS = O ii � w N u- n. ) < Q.>- U < 0O 0 >- U o (1) (/) (I) 3 2 U o C. lean clay with sand,soft,moist, brown-It. brown CL -5- \ 3/12 24.1 v.moist-wet �_ water @ 6'-0" 1/12 ___ . 33/12 20.5 -10. -'-- - • clayey sandstone/sandy claystone, moist,tan-gray with - T iron staining • -15- 1. 50/4 _.. 19.6 -20- -25- -30- -35- -40- PLATE 7 • Landmark ENGINEERING LTD. LOG OF BORING BORING NO. CLIENT: Zeek Partnership LLLP/Liberty Prop. DRILL RIG: Acker AD-II 6• . PROJECT NO: ZEEKLI-5D7H-01.709A1 ROD SIZE: AW - PROJECT LOCATION: NW 1/4, Sec.21,T3N, METHOD OF DRILLING: 4" s.s. r R68W,Weld County, Colorado DRILLER: LAM DATE DRILLED: April 26, 2005&April 27,2005 ENGINEER/GEOLOGIST: LAM ELEVATION: 5024.1. ' WEATHER: ip _ w W t-- s-= > I-.. cn v -J w DESCRIPTION fy w Z REMARKS s - Oro a.. w cc u) F' a � r-: in CO W a D O 0 - \ lean clay with sand,med. stiff- - soft, moist, brown-It. brown CL 21.9 103.5 - - 2/12 -5- v. soft, v.moist•wet _ ti water @ '-0" r• \ i • \� -10- —, • -----,..--. - _ . - J J f - clayey sandstone/sandy - - �— claystone, hard-very hard, moist, - -15- 50/9 tan-gray with iron staining -_.__.. 15.7 114.1 - -1 ; -20- 4i r1 •1 - - : ' -Y5- - i _ _ -30- - --1. -35- - -40- - - PLATE 8 - • .Landmark ENGINEERING LTD. i' I LOG OF BORING BORING NO. { CLIENT: Zeek Partnership LLLP/Liberty Prop. DRILL RIG: Acker AD-li 9 PROJECT NO: ZEEKLI-5O7H-01-709A1 ROD SIZE: AW PROJECT LOCATION: NW 1/4, Sec. 21,T3N, METHOD OF DRILLING: 4" s.s. R68W,Weld County, Colorado DRILLER: LAM DATE DRILLED: April 26,2005&April 27,2005 ENGINEER/GEOLOGIST: LAM ELEVATION: 5O2O.5 WEATHER: w w w> -J w DESCRIPTION z w a REMARKS m �f o w < nF U) Q 50 a v r;;;. (/) cn cn 5. 2 0 o ► lean clay with sand,med. stiff- \I _ - 6/12 soft, moist-v. moist, brown-It. CL 21.5 - \ brown 0 - t v. soft,v. moist-wet water @ 5'-3" \1 1/15 32.1 • • -10- \‘'\ \ sandy-very sandy claystone, - hard-very hard,moist, tan-gray - - T with iron staining - -15- 50/12_ 15.6 -20- -25- • -30- - ,, - - - -35- - -40- - PLATE 11• Landmark ENGINEERING LTD. LOG OF BORING BORING NO. CLIENT: Zeek Partnership LLLP/Liberty Prop. DRILL RIG: Acker AD-II 10 PROJECT NO: ZEEKLI-5D7H-01-709A1 ROD SIZE: AW PROJECT LOCATION: NW 1/4, Sec.21, T3N, METHOD OF DRILLING: 4"s.s. R68W,Weld County, Colorado DRILLER: LAM DATE DRILLED: April 26, 2005&April 27,2005 ENGINEER/GEOLOGIST: LAM ELEVATION: 5012.61 WEATHER: F > W r7) I _J J DESCRIPTION w REMARKS f- CO C tu • • U F- 0 � ccnn ( o .L • \''•‘. . lean clay with sand,med.stiff - pip\ soft,moist-v. moist, brown-It. - - brown,vesicular 14.9 91.2 -5- 3.5/12 .- v.soft, v.moist-wet,tan-cream L-` 5/12 - - .r 6/12 sandy clay, med. stiff,brown-It. 19.7 - -10- -'- ' \ brown —, - - water @ 12-0" - - sandy-very sandy claystone, - - • -T-: hard-very hard,moist,tan-gray - -15- • L 50/6 with iron staining_ ._ __. _.. ._ _ .__. - Z'':: - - -20- - I - - - -25- - i F - f - _ -30- - -35- - - -40- _ PLATE 12 - I ie. Landmark ENGINEERING LTD. LOG OF BORING BORING NO. CLIENT: Zeek Partnership LLLP/Liberty Prop. DRILL RIG: Acker AD-II 11 PROJECT NO: ZEEKLI-5O7H-01-709A1 ROD SIZE: AW PROJECT LOCATION: NW 1/4, Sec.21, T3N, METHOD OF DRILLING: 4"s.s. R68W,Weld County, Colorado DRILLER: LAM DATE DRILLED: April 26, 2005&April 27,2005 ENGINEER/GEOLOGIST: LAM ELEVATION: 5019. 1 ' WEATHER: -J W -� w DESCRIPTION J a z w REMARKS F- Z >- �- 0 in c0) can M O 0 .‹ lean clay with sand,med.stiff- - soft, moist-v. moist, brown-It. CL 21.7 97.9 - ! - '\ . 3/12 brown,vesicular - -5- \\ - -' 40/12 14.6 - -10- water @ 10-0"sandy-very sandy claystone, - '' hard-very hard, moist,tan-gray with iron staining - t, -15- - ' silty claystone,sI. sandy,moist, - tan-gray wl iron staining -20- 50/1.1. 15.0 120.4-25- -30- r - r -35- _ c _ -40- - PLATE 13 - Landmark ENGINEERING ENGINEERING LTD. 't- LOG OF BORING BORING NO. CLIENT: Zeek Partnership LLLP/Liberty Prop. DRILL RIG: Acker AD-II 12 PROJECT NO: ZEEKLI-5O7H-01-709A1 ROD SIZE: AW PROJECT LOCATION: NW 1/4, Sec.21,T3N, METHOD OF DRILLING: 4" s.s. R68W,Weld County, Colorado DRILLER: LAM DATE DRILLED: April 26, 2005&April 27,2005 ENGINEER/GEOLOGIST: LAM ELEVATION: 5017.6 WEATHER: -J w W - w DESCRIPTION w z w REMARKS CO Cl W O W >- < a~i- UUi < OZ rU [� cn cn cn J 2 v0 p - lean clay with sand, soft-v. soft, - • moist-v.moist, brown-It.brown CL 20.4 103.3 - 2/12 - -5- \ v.soft,wet 7 water @ 5-2" - Fy • 1/20 25.0 -10- sandy-very sandy claystone, - - — hard-very hard,moist,tan-gray - -15- ' ._ 50/7._ with iron Maining 22.2 - -20- - I:•1 -25- -30- F -35- - -40- - PLATE 14 - `- ' 'Landmarh ENGINEERING LTD. y,. i1 1 I ,E:; I Test Hole No.: 1 1 Depth: 2 1/2 ft Sample Description: lean clay with sand Moisture Content: 26.1 % Dry Density: 90.9 lbs/ft' Swell: --- `'SWELUCONSOLIDATIONI 1.00 Added `" Wateri . III I I I ! ill • Id • 0.00 . �— `.. __�_, -T �- - - --t-l_ i�_.l. _. 1.00 ---t- I i I L� - -!- - -1 1°4'`. J I � � i-- -h-I-- T -2.00 - ----4- I- --1- - _[- I ( J_ • � � I I i III � I. i h � ` o -3.00 — —_.L_— --L „J._ -----\ -_--`I- ��iz -4.00 I� -� ol II I j_ I L'H _ - j r a� 0 1 r1 I -8.00 I : •l , I I • 0.1 1 10 100 LOAD(KSF) s Test Hole No.: 1 I Depth: 15 ft • Sample Description: sandy•claystone .= Moisture Content: 12.7 % [Dry Derls'ty: 119.3 lbs/ft3 Swell: 0.9 % i *+- jSWELUCONSOLTDATIONI ';I 2.00 I IIIIl.44 Iii ; , ' i1 II + Ii_, lii 100 LI...� ._i_. �' Added I I ' I r ri H I I I I � • E ..g: z Water II I i 0.00 • �I 4-1 tl ---•_--.�_. .�._-f-- - - --�- --- . -.. !_..---f._. _.._.I 1 � F � ij l-1.00 - - 4-- i...___ __ 1__-` _.-- I _i__.... —•r U I I I ! I I I I I .1 I f I I 1 � -2.00 I I Is . I ± i s I I II . 0.1 1 10 100 '"'. LOAD(KSF) 1 (*Land mark Client: Zeek Partnership LLLP/Liberty Pr' Project No.: ZEEKLI-5D7H-01-709A1 1 i; 3521 W. Eisenhower Blvd. Loveland, Colorado 80537 DRAWING NO.: 970-667-6286 1 Test Hole No.: 2 I Depth: 2 1/2 ft Sample Description: lean clay with sand it Moisture Content: 23.6 % 'Dry Density: 99.4 Ibs/ft' Swell: --- ttt FSW ELLICONSOLI DATION1 1.00 0.00 I II I ater I l_ II -1.00 i- m 2.00 I I — r -I til o -3.00 — ;-� j-- r— 1 -� � ! I I I ; 4.00 � � I ILF fi r" _ L O 6.00 . -- -j-- ___ --`-'- --- -- ' I t[i i j v 7.00 --- 11 _ �i ` -8.00 , I t 1 I 1 fi 0.1 1 10 100 LOAD(KSF) r Test Hole No.: 3 I Depth: 15 ft Sample Description: silty claystone Moisture Content: 16.9 % Dry Density: 114.1 lbs/ft3 Swell: 3.7 % 'S W ELL/CONSOLIDATION1 T 4.00 I .�= ; � 3.00 - --- � -I_ 7.ti � _ l � 1—. . l w Ir z.oa �I G� — _ 1� 1 � 1 ! I m j o r7 Added L �I a °-° Water it ;,,, 0 0.00 l co Z Ili II I -1.00 -------- --�-- - - -- ----r---I---1 - LI----- -- --L_I 1_L_ -.. 1 1 ! II� I 'I i 11i -2.00 0.1 1 10 100 . LOAD(KSF) Laud ,i ark Clint: Zeek Partnershi LLLP/Libert Po Project No.: ZEEKLI-5D7H-01-709A1 3521 W. Eisenhower Blvd. Loveland, Colorado 80537 DRAWING NO.: 970-667-6286 2 I Test Hole No.: 4 I Depth: 7 1/2 ft Sample Description: weathered, ve sand cla stone Moisture Content: 15.6 ')/0 Dry Density: 115,0 'Ps/ft' Swell: --- % 1 WELUCONSOLIDATIONL 1.00 Added I I I i rl l 1 I f ; , I I I I I vVl__._‘.6.1 ! I riLl.r.I ____. ...._______ ..itli _______ _ __.__ • .I._. ______ ate N Iill e -1.00r , - J.--- I — 1-1- `-7 a i.. o I o -2.00 ----- --1..--_._t- -��-- — ii__-__..__._ .- I--� � -- z �. i . -3.00 - —- ........__�.... - H III -4.00 . lI I II 0.1 1 10 100 LOAD(KSF) Test Hole No.: 6 1 Depth: 2 1/2 ft Sample Description: lean clay with sand Moisture Content: 21.9 % Dry Density: 103.5 lbs/ft3 Swell: --- % • . SWELUCONSOLIDATIONI 1.00 I Aded IiTLItH1TF ; I II00 -!l -•- r- �- I i - F T r- - -- 4.. -- -.--5.00 - —�.._._ L.- - -� ----+—:. I I I t _ ._.-._._ -. t 1- . 6.00 7.00 I I I i E I ! 0.1 1 10 100 LOAD(KSF) , j t o rli Pro ec Zeek Partnership LLLP/Liberty Pry Project No.: ZEEKLI-5D7H-01-709A1 3521 W. Eisenhower Blvd. Loveland, Colorado 80537 DRAWING NO.: 970-667-6286 3 Test Hole No.: 6 I Depth: 15 ft Sample Description: sandy claystone ..'i Moisture Content: 15.7 % Dry Density: 114.1 Ibs/ft' Swell: 1.4 rl SWELUCONSOUDATION • ' 2.00 - - I k i I j liiI fIEI I iIt I I I I 1.00 ---___ ---�----I--I— ' � -- .-� �----- __... � h x Added I fla 0.00 --WateF . -k ----_--- ---- ---4---- ----" ._..f_‘ , s o l i I -1.00 - __ , I __ _ a- - __,1__.-_.__ - t 1- i I . I ' • I I -2.00 -� 0.1 1 10 100 IFj LOAD(KSF) i :t Test Hole No.: 7 1 Depth: 2 1/2 ft Sample Description: lean clay with sand *; Moisture Content: 16.6 % Dry Density: 106.0 lbs/ft3 • c.1.. Swell: 0.1 % _ iSWELUCONSOLIDATION 1 - ] I ! ti 1.00 EI I � � III I • III .'-' ; Addedl !I! I II J 0.00 - ! I± I�f l I .; tT .t1 � I I-1.00 -- --- � -F—-iu • - • , _.t__. _' . ° 111• 300 — __. . -- _1T ±1I- l ..�.1i 1 I ill T I...„ -4.00 I ! I ! I ' 0.1 1 10 100 LOAD(KSF) :.t J ,.., (�I La nd arli Proj c Zeek Partnership LLLP/Liberty Pr proect No.: ZEEKLI-5D7H-01-709A1 1 3521 W. Eisenhower Blvd. Loveland, Colorado 80537 DRAWING NO.: 970-667-6286 4 °; Test Hole No.: 8 I Depth: 7 1/2 ft ti Sample Description: very sandy claystone .1 Moisture Content: 14.4 % Dry Density: 116.5 Ibs/ft' Swell: 0.3 % !SWELL/CONSOLIDATION 1.00 I I . i I I I I ! I W I � � I i 0.00 ---1lUaten I ---- f — -- - - o sr" • p I I i 0 �, 1.00 i- I ! -T— - — s7 O Z r h U I I J . . ! .; -2.00 0.1 1 10 100 ri. LOAD(KSF) Test Hole No.: 10 I Depth: 3 1/2 ft Sample Description: lean clay with sand/sandy clay Moisture Content: 14.9 % Dry Density: 91.2 lbs/ft3 Swell: --- % ISWELUCONS0LIDATI0N '`. 1.00 Added Water; �: ' i I 0.00 -----1 , - ! I ,-� --�J_ i l _ ;--i_ —I_t.- • -' -1.00 ! ..._._._'....-', . tf It i 2.00 __ _,�_1_._ ._._ I -3.00 - — !- __.. i I .. �_ — i — _ ill T -4.00 ..-.. — -- - L- ...._..-- - 1 1 --; I. i:4 o -5.00 - __..— I F- --- --- __ — - - - - .? z 6.00 -}-t IH11 ±::fTI: -8.00 i L i -1- ..ft, 1 . J.- -9.00 0-1 1 10 100 :. LOAD(KSF) - ' eLa ild m ark Client: Zeek Partnership LLLP/Liberty Pro '`� _.../, - Project No.: ZEEKLI-5D7H-01-709A1 I 3521 W. Eisenhower Blvd. Loveland, Colorado 80537 DRAWING NO.: ti 970-667-6286 5 t 0 I Test Hole Norfl .: 11 Depth: 2 1/2 ft Sample Description: lean clay with sand 1 Moisture Content: 21.7 % Dry Density: 97.9 lbs/ft3 Swell: --- % ISWELUCONSOLIDATION I 1.00 Added ! III ' HMI" • 'W ate ! I I I I I ! I • l I ill 1 �-i t i n r i el _i.00 _ ______..._i_f L .__ f_l_ „1_,L ,____LI_____.._i_____i_ _ I_'_.1. t ill ji x -2.00 -- - �� - h—i—ii - - --o a -3.00 ` �f1TiL : .. I I ! I ! I '.. Fill -5.00 •-- -I--_i--J--r• -r - -----it - - - . --- --1— _ I � I 1 I I I ills I , III ! I -6.00i : 0.1 1 10 100 TV LOAD(KSF) Test Hole No.: 11 I Depth: 20 ft Sample Description: silty claystone, sl. Sandy. ill Moisture Content: 15.0 % JDry Density.: 120.4 Ibs/tt3 Swell: 3.6 % ISWELUCONSOLIDATION I os i ti i 4.00 , c I j III I IIIII I + I , i1 ; �.� -, 3.00 - -i.._._. �. _! 1 _i... - - -� T .i.�..�. ..- --�— - i- 1 -6 . i,,, ' � I t ! I � � I fl-.. � N 2.00gri - - t___ _ - . ..._� - - �- �._ 1- ! z I I I- IIIIII I l- ,- i i lO IlQ 1.00 ------Awed----�- --. _-_..L..--- �_ �.(f. _. .__�.__._�.. Lto V1�ater�I I I , ! I I I `I► I _�.1. Z _1.00 .- l _ . i ��_ ,rf. HT it I ! I� I 1—I I I I I I i ,t -2.00 . 0.1 1 10 100 r.1.. LOAD(KSF) w1. ,4 QLiii d ui u r� Client: Zeek Partnership LLLP/Libert Pr' I Project No.: ZEEKLI-5D7H-01 y -7O9A1 Ki 3521 W. Eisenhower Blvd. Loveland, Colorado 80537 DRAWING NO.: 'x 970-667-6286 6 !!. Test Hole No.: 12 [ Depth: 3 ft -, Sample Description: lean clay with sand Moisture Content: 20.4 % jDry Density: 103.3 lbs/ft' Swell: --- % z.• [SWELUCONSOLIDATIONJ 3.00 -. I i I j I • 2-00 E �- l I ' �- ---- —t r -- I A w 1.00 -- - L —.—_— _ —_- - -__..._1_.!-. 0.00 - ! I - -- ---�.- - -----�— li_ _fl . -±- -1.00 --- -r - l i f. Added t I , lE —f �-iJ___ -.L _ _�.__�.. . _ _- h�._.._j- .� _ -- - =a 6.00 T[ TT . flII � . . 0.1 1 10 100 LOAD(KSF) • Test Hole No.: ] Depth: ft Sample Description: sse Moisture Content: % D Densit rbs/fl3 ry �: c Swell: % % SWELUCONSOLIDATION $ 84 'Till II i iI !! L44 . .i +T _ I I Imo--- J4 -_ _.....: Ti- I 1 11-._ . I ..t oo I I f I I-I- i -1_,_t .„. ,. 0 -4 j —� ! I-I1 i i z ,_l--1 Is [ I . I MI 11- F -1- , ill ! • 0.1 1 10 100 LOAD(KSF) i- ':. -1Lb n ni a rl Client: Zeek Partnership LLLP/Liberty Pr' j�tllww Project No.: ZEEKLI-5D7H-01-709A1 3521 W. Eisenhower Blvd. Loveland, Colorado 80537 DRAWING NO.: • 970-667-6286 7 APPENDIX A Suggested Specifications for Placement of Compacted Earth Fills and/or Backfills. iti♦ _ ! GENERAL A Soils Engineer shall be the owner's representative to supervise and control all compacted fill and/or compacted backlit!placed on the project. The Soils Engineer shall approve all earth materials prior to their use, the methods of placing, and the degree of _, compaction obtained. A certificate of approval from the Soils Engineer will be required prior to the owner's final acceptance of the filling operations. MATERIALS ,fix The soils used for compacted fill beneath interior floor slabs and backlit!around foundation walls shall be relatively impervious and non-swelling. Fill materials utilized for street R;-, subgrades shall have elasticities equal to or less than and/or R-values equal to or greater than those upon which the pavement recommendations were based. The materials used should not have any rocks or lumps greater than six inches (6') and shall be free of organics, trash, frozen ground or other deleterious matter. All materials used in either compacted fill or compacted backlit!shall be subject to the approval of the Soils Engineer. PREPARATION OF SUBGRADE All topsoil and vegetation shall be removed to a depth satisfactory to the Soils Engineer before beginning preparation of the subgrade. The subgrade surface of the area to be filled shall be scarified to a minimum depth of six inches (6'), uniformly moistened or dried to within an acceptable moisture content range as determined by ASTM D 698 or as otherwise specified. The surface shall be free of ruts, ridges or other uneven surfaces which would prevent uniform compaction. The subgrade shall then be compacted to 95% or greater of ASTM D 698 or as otherwise specified. ti sa PLACING FILL No sod, brush, frozen material or other deleterious or unsuitable material shall be placed in the fill. The select fill material shall be placed in uniform, level layers in a manner which will preclude the formation of lenses and will result in a uniformly compacted fill. The thickness of each compacted lift shall be six inches (6") or as specified, as determined by the capability of the compaction equipment. Each lift shall be compacted to the requirements described in Compaction Requirements of this Appendix or as specified otherwise. p MOISTURE CONTROL The fill material in each layer, at the time of compaction, shall contain the amount of moisture required for optimum density; and the moisture shall be uniform throughout the fill. Expansive soils may need moisture above the optimum moisture content in order to pre-swell the soil as based on laboratory tests. The contractor may be required to add and thoroughly mix moisture to the backfill material. If, in the opinion of the Soils Engineer, the material proposed for use in the compacted fill is too wet to permit adequate compaction, it shall be dried in an acceptable manner prior to placement and compaction or a suitable imported fill material may be chosen. : I COMPACTION METHODS s When an acceptable, uniform moisture content is obtained, each layer shall be compacted by a method acceptable to the Soils Engineer and as specified in the foregoing report as determined by the Standard Proctor Test (ASTM D 698). Compaction shall be performed by rolling with approved ramping rollers, three-wheel power rollers, or other approved equipment well suited to the soil being compacted. If a sheepsfoot roller is used, it shall be provided with cleaner bars so attached as to prevent the accumulation of material between the tamper feet. ";z ' I COMPACTION REQUIREMENTS The following compaction requirements are based on the Standard proctor(ASTM D 698). Location Compaction Overlot Fills - Supporting Foundations, 95% Exterior Slabs, Roadways, Driveways, Curb, Gutters, Drive-over Walks Overlot Fills - Backlots Where No 90% Structures Will Be Located Utility Lines Under Roadways, Curb/Walk, etc. 95% Under Yards, Backlots, etc. 90% Interior Floor Slabs 95% ± 2% *** If expansive material is used for fill, moisture content should be -1% to +3% above optimum. ** If expansive material is used for fill, moisture content should be optimum to 4% above optimum. i MOISTURE - DENSITY DETERMINATION (PROCTOR) Samples of representative fill materials to be placed shall be furnished by the contractor to the Soils Engineer at least 48 hours prior to compaction testing for determination of maximum density and optimum moisture for these materials. Tests for this determination will be made using methods conforming to requirements of ASTM D 698. Copies of the F!^ results of these tests will be furnished to the contractor. These test results shall be the basis of control for compaction effort. DENSITY TESTS The density and moisture content of each layer of compacted fill will be determined by the Soils Engineer in accordance with ASTM D 1556, 02167 or O2922, at frequencies required by municipal codes, city or county inspectors, or by the Soils Engineer. Any material found to not comply with the minimum specified density shall be recompacted and retested until the required density is obtained. The results of all density tests shall be furnished to both the owner and the contractor by the Soils Engineer. Y-- APPENDIX B FLEXIBLE PAVEMENT CALCULATIONS State: Colorado Job Number: ZEEKLI-5D7H-01-709A1 Agency: Weld County Company: Liberty Properties LLC Location: NW 1/4, Sec. 21, T3N, R6 Contractor: Weld County, Colorado Engineer: Landmark Engineering Ltd Local streets Flexible Analysis =__ Structural Number = 2.29 Design E I8's = 36,500 Reliability = 75.00 percent Overall Deviation = 0.44 Resilient Modulus = 3,775.0 psi Initial Serviceability = 4.50 Terminal Serviceablity = 2.00 Layer Layer Drainage Layer Number Coefficient Coefficient Thickness a(i)*Cd*t _= a (i) ___= Cd =__ __= t 1 0.44 1.00 3.50 1.76 2 0.11 1.00 8.00 0.66 3 4 5 6 Total SN = 2.42 I APPENDIX B FLEXIBLE PAVEMENT CALCULATIONS State: Colorado Job Number: ZEEKLI-5D7H-01-709A1 Agency: Weld County Company: Liberty Properties LLC Location: NW 1/4, Sec. 21, T3N, R6 Contractor: Weld County, Colorado Engineer: Landmark Engineering Ltd Local streets -- Flexible Analysis =__---- _--- I Structural Number = 2.29 t Design E 18's = 36,500 Reliability = 75.00 percent Overall Deviation = 0.44 Resilient Modulus = 3,775.0 psi Initial Serviceability = 4.50 Terminal Serviceablity = 2.00 Layer Layer Drainage Layer Number Coefficient Coefficient Thickness a(i)*Cd*t _= a (i) __ ___= Cd =__ — t =__ _________ 1 0.44 1.00 4.00 1.76 2 0.11 1.00 6.00 0.66 3 4 5 6 Total SN = 2.42 r., APPENDIX B FLEXIBLE PAVEMENT CALCULATIONS State: Colorado Job Number: ZEEKLI-5D7H-01-709A1 Agency: Weld County Company: Liberty Properties LLC Location: NW 1/4, Sec. 21, T3N, R6 Contractor: Weld County, Colorado Engineer: Landmark Engineering Ltd Collector streets -- __ Flexible Analysis -------- Structural Number = 2.97 Design E 18's = 182,500 Reliability = 75.00 percent Overall Deviation = 0.44 • Resilient Modulus = 3,775.0 psi Initial Serviceability = 4.50 Terminal Serviceablity = 2.30 Layer Layer Drainage Layer .,r Number Coefficient Coefficient Thickness a(i)*Cd*t — -- a (i) __ __ — Cd =_ __= t =-- 1 0.44 1.00 4.50(H.B.P.) 1.98 2 0.11 1.00 9.00(A.B.C.) 0.99 3 4 5 6 Total SN = 2.97 rr APPENDIX B bi l FLEXIBLE PAVEMENT CALCULATIONS State: Colorado Job Number: ZEEKLI-5D7H-01-709A1 Agency: Weld County Company: Liberty Properties LLC Location: NW 1/4, Sec. 21, T3N, R6 Contractor: Weld County, Colorado Engineer: Landmark Engineering Ltd Collector streets Flexible Analysis --- Structural Number = 2.97 Design E 18's = 182,500 Reliability = 75.00 percent Overall Deviation = 0.44 Resilient Modulus = 3,775.0 psi Initial Serviceability = 4.50 rt Terminal Serviceablity = 2.30 Layer Layer Drainage Layer Number Coefficient Coefficient Thickness a(i)*Cd*t 1 0.44 1.00 5.00(H.B.P.) 2.20 2 0.11 1.00 7.00(A.B.C.) 0.77 3 4 vv5i 5 I 6 Total SN = 2.97 Hello