HomeMy WebLinkAbout20072731 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY
AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: HUMAN SERVICES FUND
BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Head Start Program - - 60000-2611
DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: Health, nutrition, education and day care programs for
economically disadvantaged pre-school age children.
ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED RECOMMEND
RESOURCES LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY
Personnel Services $ 1,794,041 $ 1,700,000 $ 2,084,000 $ 2,084,000
Supplies 403,341 143,200 416,500 416,500
Purchased Services 856,479 1,125,500 470,266 470,266
Fixed Charges 10,190 10,000 3,000 3,000
Gross County Cost $ 3,064,051 $ 2,978,700 $ 2,973,766 $ 2,973,766
Revenue 3,064,051 2,978,700 2,973,766 2,973,766
Net County Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0
Budget Positions - - -- - - --
SUMMARY OF CHANGES: Slight decrease of$4,934 in grant funding level.
OBJECTIVES: 1) Administer program in accordance with Department of Health and Human
Services(DHHS)rules and regulations; and 2) Provide services to eligible clients as specified in
the Head Start plan approved by the Board.
PERFORMANCE MEASURES
ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED
Work Outputs
Clients Served 562 562 562
Efficiency Measures
Per capita cost $13.93 $13.15 $12.74
Per capita cost (county support) In-Kind $3.48 $3.29 $3.19
Effectiveness Measures (desired results)
Maintain full case load slots 562 562 562
FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval.
BOARD ACTION: No change.
309
2007-2731
BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY
AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: HUMAN SERVICES FUND
BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Migrant Head Start- - 60000-2614
DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: Health, nutrition and day care programs for infant/toddler and
preschool-age migrant children in Northeast Colorado and the Western slope.
ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED RECOMMEND
RESOURCES LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY
Personnel Services $ 1,317,432 $ 1,284,500 $ 1,382,646 $ 1,382,646
Supplies 297,669 99,000 262,000 262,000
Purchased Services 740,521 834,100 671,012 671,012
Fixed Charges 1,112 1,300 1,110 1,110
Gross County Cost $ 2,356,734 $ 2,218,900 $ 2,316,768 $ 2,316,768
Revenue 2,356,734 2,218,900 2,316,768 2,316,768
Net County Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0
Budget Positions - - - - - - --
SUMMARY OF CHANGES: Increase of$97,868 in grant funding level.
OBJECTIVES: 1) Administer program in accordance with DHHS rules and regulations; and 2)
Provide services to eligible clients as specified in the Migrant Head Start plan.
PERFORMANCE MEASURES
ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED
Work Outputs
Clients served 266 266 275
Efficiency Measures
Per capita cost $10.65 $9.79 $9.93
Per capita cost (county support) In-kind $2.68 $2.45 $2.48
Effectiveness Measures (desired results)
Maintain performance standards Yes Yes Yes
FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval.
BOARD ACTION: No change.
310
BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY
AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: HUMAN SERVICES FUND
BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Building Healthy Marriages - - 60000-2615
DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: The Weld County Healthy Marriage Initiative is strengthening
marriages by providing low-income couples with marriage education and support services on a
voluntary basis so that they can gain the skills necessary to have healthy marriages.
ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED RECOMMEND
RESOURCES LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY
Personnel Services $ 300,262 $ 354,389 $ 354,389
Supplies 32,190 25,747 25,747
Purchased Services 336,396 443,199 443,199
Fixed Charges 0 0 0
Gross County Cost $ 0 $ 668,848 $ 823,335 $ 823,335
Revenue 668,848 823,335 823,335
Net County Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0
Budget Positions - - - - - - --
SUMMARY OF CHANGES: This program was new in 2007.
OBJECTIVES:
PERFORMANCE MEASURES
ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED
Work Outputs
Clients Served 0 125 175
Efficiency Measures
Per capita cost 0 $2.95 $3.53
Per capita cost (county support) In-Kind
FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval.
BOARD ACTION:
311
BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY
AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: HUMAN SERVICES FUND
BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Preschool Fund - - 60000-2617
DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: Contracted Preschool slots with various school districts.
ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED RECOMMEND
RESOURCES LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY
Personnel Services $ 135,493 $ 82,600 $ 89,108 $ 89,108
Supplies 6,974 0 3,000 3,000
Purchased Services 64,900 35,892 35,892
Gross County Cost $ 142,467 $ 147,500 $ 128,000 $ 128,000
Revenue 147,500 128,000 128,000
Net County Cost $ 142,467 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0
Budget Positions - - - - - - --
SUMMARY OF CHANGES: Funded at contract level with participating school districts.
OBJECTIVES: Provide preschool services to school districts requesting the services.
PERFORMANCE MEASURES
ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED
Work Outputs
Clients served 41 41 41
Efficiency Measures
Per capita cost $0.66 $0.65 $0.55
Effectiveness Measures (desired results)
Full slots maintained Yes Yes Yes
FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval.
BOARD ACTION:
312
BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY
AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: HUMAN SERVICES FUND
BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Building Health Marriages NSF - - 60000-2618
DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: This fund houses the Non-Federal Share (matching) for the
Building Healthy Marriages Initiative.
ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED RECOMMEND
RESOURCES LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY
Personnel Services $ 0 $ 0 $ 0
Supplies 0 0 0
Purchased Services 10,000 0 0
Fixed Charges 0 10,000 10,000
Gross County Cost $ 0 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 10,000
Revenue 10,000 10,000 10,000
Net County Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0
Budget Positions - - - - - - --
SUMMARY OF CHANGES: Funded at grant level.
OBJECTIVES: To record the cost of training counselors in the Building Healthy Marriages Initiative.
PERFORMANCE MEASURES
ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED
Work Outputs
Participants n/a n/a n/a
Efficiency Measures
Per capita cost n/a $0.04 $0.04
FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval.
BOARD ACTION:
313
BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY
AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: HUMAN SERVICES FUND
BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Wagner/Peyser- - 60000-2626
DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: Administer all Job Service activities to the residents of Weld
County.
ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED RECOMMEND
RESOURCES LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY
Personnel Services $ 558,758 $ 433,000 $ 692,800 $ 692,800
Supplies 1,337 800 2,000 2,000
Purchased Services 12,759 136,000 75,004 75,004
Gross County Cost $ 572,854 $ 569,800 $ 769,804 $ 769,804
Revenue 572,854 569,800 769,804 769,804
Net County Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0
Budget Positions - - - - - - - -
SUMMARY OF CHANGES: Funded at grant level.
OBJECTIVES: 1) Administer Wagner/Peyser Contract in accordance with DOL rules and
regulations; and 2)Provide services to eligible clients as specified in the One Stop plan approved
by the Board.
PERFORMANCE MEASURES
ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED
Work Outputs
Clients served 16,000 16,000 18,000
Efficiency Measures
Per capita cost $2.60 $2.51 $3.30
Effectiveness Measures (desired results)
Job placements 60% 60% 60%
FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval.
BOARD ACTION:
314
BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY
AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: HUMAN SERVICES FUND
BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Summer Job Hunt- - 60000-2627
DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: Administer youth employment program for the summer months.
ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED RECOMMEND
RESOURCES LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY
Personnel Services $ 26,776 $ 26,000 $ 28,500 $ 28,500
Supplies 1,424 0 1,500 1,500
Purchased Services 2,800 5,000 3,000 3,000
Gross County Cost $ 31,000 $ 31,000 $ 33,000 $ 33,000
Revenue 31,000 31,000 33,000 33,000
Net County Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0
Budget Positions - - - - - - - -
SUMMARY OF CHANGES: Funded at grant level.
OBJECTIVES: 1) Administer Summer Job Hunt contract in accordance with DOL rules and
regulations;and 2)Provide services to eligible clients as specified in the One Stop plan approved
by the Board.
PERFORMANCE MEASURES
ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED
Work Outputs
Clients served 2,743 2,743 2,750
Efficiency Measures
Per capita cost $0.14 $0.14 $0.14
Effectiveness Measures (desired results)
Clients placed in employment 514 514 515
FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval.
BOARD ACTION:
315
BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY
AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: HUMAN SERVICES FUND
BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Consumer Navigator- - 60000-2628
DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: Program to enhance workforce center services to the disabled
of the community.
ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED RECOMMEND
RESOURCES LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY
Personnel Services $ 40,018 $ 40,850 $ 44,000 $ 44,000
Supplies 1,628 500 0 0
Purchased Services 1,650 1,000 1,000
Gross County Cost $ 41,646 $ 43,000 $ 45,000 $ 45,000
Revenue 41,646 43,000 45,000 45,000
Net County Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0
Budget Positions - - - - - - - -
SUMMARY OF CHANGES: Funded at grant level.
OBJECTIVES: To keep clients off public assistance and employed.
PERFORMANCE MEASURES
ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED
Work Outputs
Clients served 260 260 260
Efficiency Measures
Per capita cost $0.19 $0.19 $0.19
Effectiveness Measures (desired results)
Output goals maintained Yes Yes Yes
FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval.
BOARD ACTION:
316
BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY
AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: HUMAN SERVICES FUND
BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Employment First- - 60000-2629
DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: This program allows eligible Food Stamp clients to participate
in various job search and development activities to retrain them for better paying jobs.
ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED RECOMMEND
RESOURCES LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY
Personnel Services $ 100,000 $ 110,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000
Supplies 2,000 2,000 2,300 2,300
Purchased Services 63,000 36,800 53,940 53,940
Gross County Cost $ 165,000 $ 148,800 $ 156,240 $ 156,240
Revenue 165,000 148,800 156,240 156,240
Net County Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0
Budget Positions - - - - - - - -
SUMMARY OF CHANGES: Funded at contract level of$156,240
OBJECTIVES: 1)Administer program in accordance with USDA rules and regulations; and 2)
Provide services to eligible clients as specified in the Employment First plan approved by the Board.
PERFORMANCE MEASURES
ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED
Work Outputs
Clients served 1,458 1,458 1,458
Efficiency Measures
Per capita cost $0.75 $0.66 $0.64
Effectiveness Measures (desired results)
Clients placed in employment 300 300 300
FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval.
BOARD ACTION:
317
BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY
AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: HUMAN SERVICES FUND
BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Tony Grampsas Youth Services - - 6000-2630
DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: This grant provides employment and training opportunities to
high risk youth.
ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED RECOMMEND
RESOURCES LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY
Personnel Services $ 0 $ 0 $ 0
Supplies 0 0 0
Purchased Services 0 0 0
Gross County Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0
Revenue 0 0 0
Net County Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0
Budget Positions - - - - - - - -
SUMMARY OF CHANGES: Program discontinued by the state.
FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: n/a
BOARD ACTION: n/a
318
BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY
AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: HUMAN SERVICES FUND
BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Assistance to Needy Families - - 60000-2632
DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: Employment/Training program for clients on welfare.
ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED RECOMMEND
RESOURCES LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY
Personnel Services $ 425,170 $ 565,800 $ 498,950 $ 498,950
Supplies 4,740 2,000 0 0
Purchased Services 149,690 165,000 241,240 241,240
Gross County Cost $ 579,600 $ 732,800 $ 740,190 $ 740,190
Revenue 579,600 732,800 740,190 740,190
Net County Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0
Budget Positions - - - - - - - -
SUMMARY OF CHANGES: Increased funding of$7,390, per grant contract.
OBJECTIVES: Provide employment services to TANF clients.
PERFORMANCE MEASURES
ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED
Work Outputs
Clients served/month 320 320 330
Efficiency Measures
Per capita cost (county support) $2.64 $3.23 $3.18
Effectiveness Measures (desired results)
Meet Federal participation rates Yes Yes Yes
FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval.
BOARD ACTION:
319
BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY
AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: HUMAN SERVICES FUND
BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Workforce Investment Act(Administration)60000-2635
DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: This program tracks the administration for all of the Workforce
Investment Act grants.
ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED RECOMMEND
RESOURCES LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY
Personnel Services $ 144,015 $ 105,500 $ 122,300 $ 122,300
Supplies 251 500 200 200
Purchased Services 9,665 15,000 13,425 13,425
Gross County Cost $ 153,931 $ 121,000 $ 135,925 $ 135,925
Revenue 153,931 121,000 135,925 135,925
Net County Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0
Budget Positions - - - - - - - -
SUMMARY OF CHANGES: Increased funding of$14,925, per grant funding level.
OBJECTIVES: To assist client in finding employment.
PERFORMANCE MEASURES
ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED
Efficiency Measures
Per capita cost $0.70 $0.53 $0.58
FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval.
BOARD ACTION:
320
BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY
AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: HUMAN SERVICES FUND
BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Workforce Investment Act (Adult Program) 60000-2636
DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: This program provides employment and training for eligible
adults.
ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED RECOMMEND
RESOURCES LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY
Personnel Services $ 248,168 $ 176,000 $ 180,000 $ 180,000
Supplies 2,734 3,500 2,500 2,500
Purchased Services 254,973 121,700 184,168 184,168
Gross County Cost $ 505,875 $ 301,200 $ 366,668 $ 366,668
Revenue 505,875 301,200 366,668 366,668
Net County Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0
Budget Positions - - - - - - - -
SUMMARY OF CHANGES: Funded at grant level.
OBJECTIVES: Provide eligible adults with core services to attain employment.
PERFORMANCE MEASURES
ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED
Work Outputs
Clients served 160 150 172
Efficiency Measures
Per capita cost $2.30 $1.33 $1.57
Effectiveness Measures (desired results)
Entered employment rate 88% 88% 88%
FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval.
BOARD ACTION:
321
BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY
AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: HUMAN SERVICES FUND
BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Workforce Investment Act(Youth Prog ram)60000-2637
DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: This program provides employment and training programs for
in-school and out-of-school youth.
ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED RECOMMEND
RESOURCES LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY
Personnel Services $ 341,236 $ 320,000 $ 308,450 $ 308,450
Supplies 16,145 9,000 14,610 14,610
Purchased Services 210,619 108,000 191,027 191,027
Gross County Cost $ 568,000 $ 437,000 $ 514,087 $ 514,087
Revenue 568,000 437,000 514,087 514,087
Net County Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0
Budget Positions - - - - - - - -
SUMMARY OF CHANGES: Increased grant funding level of$77,087.
OBJECTIVES: To provide core services to eligible youth.
PERFORMANCE MEASURES
ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED
Work Outputs
Youth served 160 170 197
Efficiency Measures
Per capita cost $2.20 $1.93 $2.19
Effectiveness Measures (desired results)
Entered Employment rate (Older Youth) 79% 79% 79%
Skill Attainment rate (Younger Youth)
FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval.
BOARD ACTION:
322
BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY
AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: HUMAN SERVICES FUND
BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Multi-Disciplinary Youth Assessment - - 60000-2638
DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: This program provides planning and treatment plans for at-risk
youth in combination with the DA, SS, North Range and Island Grove.
ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED RECOMMEND
RESOURCES LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY
Personnel Services $ 46,476 $ 39,600 $ 41,100 $ 41,100
Supplies 210 2,000 500 500
Purchased Services 342 0 0 0
Gross County Cost $ 47,028 $ 41,600 $ 41,600 $ 41,600
Revenue 41,600 41,600 41,600 41,600
Net County Cost $ 5,428 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0
Budget Positions - - - - - - - -
SUMMARY OF CHANGES: No change.
OBJECTIVES: 1)Administer program in accordance with Social Services contract.
PERFORMANCE MEASURES
ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED
Work Outputs
Clients served 120 120 120
Efficiency Measures
Per capita cost $0.18 $0.18 $0.18
Effectiveness Measures (desired results)
Maintain requirements of contract Yes Yes Yes
FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval.
BOARD ACTION:
323
BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY
AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: HUMAN SERVICES FUND
BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: 10% Incentive Grant (CIMS) 60000-2639
DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: To foster the development and continuous improvements of the
Weld County region workforce system.
ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED RECOMMEND
RESOURCES LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY
Personnel Services $ 0 $ 15,500 $ 15,500
Supplies 0 0 0
Purchased Services 0 4,000 4,000
Gross County Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 19,500 $ 19,500
Revenue 19,500 19,500
Net County Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0
Budget Positions - - - - - - - -
SUMMARY OF CHANGES: Grant funding level is budgeted at a more realistic level for 2008.
OBJECTIVES: To meet annual requirements of grant.
PERFORMANCE MEASURES
ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED
Efficiency Measures
Per capita cost $0.00 $0.00 $0.08
FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval.
BOARD ACTION:
324
BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY
AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: HUMAN SERVICES FUND
Workforce Investment Act
BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: (Statewide Activities Grant) 60000-2640
DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: These funds are incentive grants based on performance of the
WIA programs and are used for staff training, administration, contracted services and other
programs.
ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED RECOMMEND
RESOURCES LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY
Personnel Services $ 1,170 $ 15,000 $ 3,000 $ 3,000
Supplies 636 0 9,000 9,000
Purchased Services 9,714 10,000 13,000 13,000
Gross County Cost $ 11,520 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000
Revenue 11,520 25,000 25,000 25,000
Net County Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0
Budget Positions - - - - - - - -
SUMMARY OF CHANGES: Grant funding level is budgeted at a more realistic level for 2008.
OBJECTIVES: To meet annual requirements of grant.
PERFORMANCE MEASURES
ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED
Efficiency Measures
Per capita cost $0.05 $0.11 $0.11
FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval.
BOARD ACTION:
325
BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY
AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: HUMAN SERVICES FUND
BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: 25% Rapid Response 60000-2642
DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: These funds are incentive grants based on performance of the
WIA programs and are used for equipment for developing mass application taking via the internet
with a smart board.
ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED RECOMMEND
RESOURCES LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY
Personnel Services $ 0 $ 0 $ 13,825 $ 13,825
Supplies 0 0 0 0
Purchased Services 0 0 0 0
Gross County Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 13,825 $ 13,825
Revenue 0 0 13,825 13,825
Net County Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0
Budget Positions - - - - - - - -
SUMMARY OF CHANGES: This is a new grant in 2008.
OBJECTIVES: Incentive grant for technology applications to workforce development.
PERFORMANCE MEASURES
ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED
Work Outputs
Clients served - - - - 75
Efficiency Measures
Per capita cost - - - - $0.06
FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval.
BOARD ACTION:
326
BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY
AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: HUMAN SERVICES FUND
Workforce Investment Act
BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: (Dislocated Worker Program) 60000-2643
DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: This program provides retraining for laid off clients.
ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED RECOMMEND
RESOURCES LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY
Personnel Services $ 193,809 $ 160,000 $ 241,330 $ 241,330
Supplies 4,899 2,000 43,600 43,600
Purchased Services 197,225 188,600 194,416 194,416
Gross County Cost $ 395,933 $ 350,600 $ 479,346 $ 479,346
Revenue 395,933 350,600 479,346 479,346
Net County Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0
Budget Positions - - - - - - - -
SUMMARY OF CHANGES: Grant funding level has increased $128,746.
OBJECTIVES: Provide retraining for eligible laid off clients.
PERFORMANCE MEASURES
ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED
Work Outputs
Clients served 140 140 140
Efficiency Measures
Per capita cost $1.80 $1.55 $2.05
Effectiveness Measures (desired results)
Entered employment rate 88% 88% 88%
FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval.
BOARD ACTION:
327
BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY
AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: HUMAN SERVICES FUND
BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Educational Lab - - 60000-2645
DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: This fund covers the cost of operating the Computer Education
Lab.
ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED RECOMMEND
RESOURCES LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY
Personnel Services $ 151,207 $ 150,000 $ 157,000 $ 157,000
Supplies 38,283 15,000 18,000 18,000
Purchased Services 40,663 121,000 125,000 125,000
Gross County Cost $ 230,153 $ 286,000 $ 300,000 $ 300,000
Revenue 249,468 286,000 300,000 300,000
Net County Cost $ -19,315 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0
Budget Positions - - - - - - - -
SUMMARY OF CHANGES: Salaries are up $7,000, Supplies $3,000, and services $4,000 to
support the lab.
OBJECTIVES: Provide a computer educational experience for clients.
PERFORMANCE MEASURES
ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED
Work Outputs
Clients served 1,135 1,135 1,200
Efficiency Measures
Per capita cost $1.05 $1.26 $1.29
Effectiveness Measures (desired results)
GED's obtained 65 65 70
FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval.
BOARD ACTION:
328
BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY
AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: HUMAN SERVICES FUND
BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: AmeriCorps Program - - 60000-2646
DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: Youth Corp program.
ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED RECOMMEND
RESOURCES LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY
Personnel Services $ 152,810 $ 187,650 $ 189,880 $ 189,880
Supplies 6,360 11,150 11,320 11,320
Purchased Services 0 0 0 0
Gross County Cost $ 159,170 $ 198,800 $ 201,200 $ 201,200
Revenue 159,170 198,800 201,200 201,200
Net County Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0
Budget Positions - - - - - - - -
SUMMARY OF CHANGES: Grant funding increased $2,400.
OBJECTIVES: Provide Federal AmeriCorps program for youth to receive stipends and college
tuition credits for public service work.
PERFORMANCE MEASURES
ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED
Work Outputs
Participants in program 12 12 12
Efficiency Measures
Per capita cost $0.73 $0.88 $0.87
Effectiveness Measures (desired results)
Clients completing program 10 11 10
FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval.
BOARD ACTION:
329
BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY
AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: HUMAN SERVICES FUND
BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Tight Corp Program - - 60000-2648
DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: Youth Corp Program
ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED RECOMMEND
RESOURCES LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY
Personnel Services $ 70,750 $ 85,600 $ 93,620 $ 93,620
Supplies 4,590 7,200 8,400 8,400
Purchased Services 90,690 107,700 119,440 119,440
Gross County Cost $ 166,030 $ 200,500 $ 221,460 $ 221,460
Revenue 166,030 200,500 221,460 221,460
Net County Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0
Budget Positions - - - - - - - -
SUMMARY OF CHANGES: Funding level of the Youth Corp Grant is up $20,960.
OBJECTIVES: To engage youth in community service and educational activities in lieu of out of
home placement with the Department of Social Services.
PERFORMANCE MEASURES
ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED
Work Outputs
Participants 24 24 24
Efficiency Measures
Per capita cost $0.76 $0.88 $0.95
Effectiveness Measures (desired results)
Participants completing program 18 18 18
FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval.
BOARD ACTION:
330
BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY
AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: HUMAN SERVICES FUND
BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Pillars of Successful Independence - - 60000-2640
DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: A TANF Program for foster children,ages 13-1/2 to 15 preparing
them for transition to adulthood.
ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED RECOMMEND
RESOURCES LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY
Personnel Services $ 0 $ 0 $ 66,265 $ 66,265
Supplies 0 0 600 600
Purchased Services 0 0 22,248 22,248
Gross County Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 89,113 $ 89,113
Revenue 0 0 89,113 89,113
Net County Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0
Budget Positions - - - - - - - -
SUMMARY OF CHANGES: New grant program for 2008
OBJECTIVES: To provide core services to eligible youth.
PERFORMANCE MEASURES
ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED
Work Outputs
Clients served - - - - 15
Efficiency Measures
Per capita cost - - - - $0.38
Effectiveness Measures (desired results)
To enhance the ability of Foster children to
gain independence. - - - - 15
FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval.
BOARD ACTION:
331
BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY
AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: HUMAN SERVICES FUND
BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Area Agency on Aging (Administration) 60000-2651
DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: This Older American's Act Grant administers the Senior
programs of the Area Agency on Aging.
ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED RECOMMEND
RESOURCES LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY
Personnel Services $ 59,440 $ 58,770 $ 27,710 $ 27,710
Supplies 585 500 60 60
Purchased Services 8,090 7,580 42,411 42,411
Gross County Cost $ 68,115 $ 66,850 $ 70,181 $ 70,181
Revenue 55,764 54,499 57,830 57,830
Net County Cost $ 12,351 $ 12,351 $ 12,351 $ 12,351
Budget Positions - - - - - - - -
SUMMARY OF CHANGES: No change.
OBJECTIVES: 1)Administer program as defined by CDHS/OAA rules and regulations; and 2)
Provide services to eligible clients as specified in the Area Agency on Aging grant approved by the
Board.
PERFORMANCE MEASURES
ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED
Work Outputs
Programs administered 11 11 11
Efficiency Measures
Per capita cost (county support) $0.06 $0.06 $0.06
Per capita cost (other) $0.26 $0.24 $0.25
FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. This is the only
locally funded program in Human Services Fund.
BOARD ACTION:
332
BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY
AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: HUMAN SERVICES FUND
BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Area Agency on Aging(Support Services)60000-2652
DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: This grant provides several contracted services to the elderly;
adult day care, home nursing care, peer counseling, outreach, respite services, legal counseling
and ombudsman assistance.
ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED RECOMMEND
RESOURCES LAST Pt CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY
Personnel Services $ 87,475 $ 81,550 $ 85,050 $ 85,050
Supplies 560 800 0 0
Purchased Services 129,865 143,960 149,560 149,560
Gross County Cost $ 217,900 $ 226,310 $ 234,610 $ 234,610
Revenue 217,900 226,310 234,610 234,610
Net County Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0
Budget Positions - - - - - - - -
SUMMARY OF CHANGES: Grant funding is up $8,300.
OBJECTIVES: 1)Administer program as defined by CDHS/OAA rules and regulations; and 2)
Provide services to eligible clients as specified in the Area Agency on Aging grant approved by the
Board.
PERFORMANCE MEASURES
ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED
Work Outputs
Outreach - Homebound Spanish elderly 2,000 2,000 2,000
Adult day care 7,000 7,000 7,000
Peer Counseling 2,500 2,500 2,000
Legal consultation/representation 925 950 900
Homemaker and personal care 1,200 1,200 1,100
Nursing home advocacy 1,600 1,600 1,600
Efficiency Measures
Per capita cost $0.99 $1.00 $1.01
Effectiveness Measures (desired results)
Work output goals are maintained Yes Yes Yes
FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval.
BOARD ACTION:
333
BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY
AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: HUMAN SERVICES FUND
Area Agency on Aging
BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: (Congregate Meal Program) 60000-2653
DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: This grant provides meals to the senior population at 23 nutrition
sites around the county.
ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED RECOMMEND
RESOURCES LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY
Personnel Services $ 74,430 $ 82,670 $ 70,620 $ 70,620
Supplies 7,500 7,000 3,630 3,630
Purchased Services 309,260 293,160 330,770 330,770
Gross County Cost $ 391,190 $ 382,830 $ 405,020 $ 405,020
Revenue 391,190 382,830 405,020 405,020
Net County Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0
Budget Positions - - - - - - - -
SUMMARY OF CHANGES: Budget is based on grant level.
OBJECTIVES: 1)Administer program as defined by CDHS/OAA rules and regulations; and 2)
Provide services to eligible clients as specified in the Area Agency on Aging grant approved by the
Board.
PERFORMANCE MEASURES
ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED
Work Outputs
Meals served 58,000 58,000 56,000
Efficiency Measures
Per capita cost $1.78 $1.69 $1.74
FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval.
BOARD ACTION:
334
BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY
AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: HUMAN SERVICES FUND
Area Agency on Aging
BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: (Home Delivered Meals) 60000-2654
DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: This grant provides home delivered meals through Meals on
Wheels and also funds the Liquid Supplement Program.
ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED RECOMMEND
RESOURCES LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY
Personnel Services $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0
Supplies 0 0 0 0
Purchased Services 42,000 42,000 42,000 42,000
Gross County Cost $ 42,000 $ 42,000 $ 42,000 $ 42,000
Revenue 42,000 42,000 42,000
Net County Cost $ 42,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0
Budget Positions - - - - - - - -
SUMMARY OF CHANGES: No change.
OBJECTIVES: 1)Administer program as defined by CDHS/OAA rules and regulations; and 2)
Provide services to eligible clients as specified in the Area Agency on Aging grant approved by the
Board.
PERFORMANCE MEASURES
ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED
Work Outputs
Meals Served 15,500 15,500 15,500
Efficiency Measures
Per capita cost $0.20 $0.19 $0.18
Effectiveness Measures (desired results)
Work output goals are maintained. Yes Yes Yes
FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval.
BOARD ACTION:
335
BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY
AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: HUMAN SERVICES FUND
BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Area Agency on Aging (Health Services) 60000-2655
DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: This grant provides health services to senior community. This
grant supports the annual senior health fair and the wellspring club.
ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED RECOMMEND
RESOURCES LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY
Personnel Services $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0
Supplies 0 0 140 140
Purchased Services 12,890 14,980 12,900 12,900
Gross County Cost $ 12,890 $ 14,980 $ 13,040 $ 13,040
Revenue 12,890 14,980 13,040 13,040
Net County Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0
Budget Positions - - - - - - - -
SUMMARY OF CHANGES: Grant funding level is down $1,940.
OBJECTIVES: 1)Administer program as defined by CDHS/OAA rules and regulations; and 2)
Provide services to eligible clients as specified in the Area Agency on Aging grant approved by the
Board.
PERFORMANCE MEASURES
ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED
Work Outputs
Clients served 1,000 1,000 1,000
Efficiency Measures
Per capita cost $0.06 $0.07 $0.06
Effectiveness Measures (desired results)
Work output goals are maintained Yes Yes Yes
FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval.
BOARD ACTION:
336
BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY
AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: HUMAN SERVICES FUND
Area Agency on Aging
BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: (Elder Abuse Grant) 60000-2657
DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: This grant provides for educational training to the community on
elder abuse.
ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED RECOMMEND
RESOURCES LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY
Personnel Services $ 3,113 $ 2,190 $ 2,230 $ 2,230
Supplies 0 0 0 0
Purchased Services 0 0 0 0
Gross County Cost $ 3,113 $ 2,190 $ 2,230 $ 2,230
Revenue 3,113 2,190 2,230 2,230
Net County Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0
Budget Positions - - - - - - - -
SUMMARY OF CHANGES: Funding level is up $40.
OBJECTIVES: Provide training to the community on elderly abuse.
PERFORMANCE MEASURES
ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED
Work Outputs
Educated CNA, staff, NH residents/families 200 200 200
Efficiency Measures
Per capita cost $0.02 $0.01 $0.01
Effectiveness Measures (desired results)
Education of long term staff 200 200 200
FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval.
BOARD ACTION:
337
BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY
AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: HUMAN SERVICES FUND
Area Agency on Aging
BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: (Special Ombudsman) 60000-2658
DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: These funds supplement the support services fund.
ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED RECOMMEND
RESOURCES LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY
Personnel Services $ 6,025 $ 5,340 $ 4,530 $ 4,530
Supplies 0 0 0 0
Purchased Services 0 0 860 860
Gross County Cost $ 6,025 $ 5,340 $ 5,390 $ 5,390
Revenue 6,025 5,340 5,390 5,390
Net County Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0
Budget Positions - - - - - - - -
SUMMARY OF CHANGES: Funding level is up slightly by $50.
OBJECTIVES: 1)Administer program as defined by CDHS/OAA rules and regulations; and 2)
Provide services to eligible clients as specified in the Area Agency on Aging grant approved by the
Board.
PERFORMANCE MEASURES
ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED
Work Outputs
Complaints investigated 100 150 150
Efficiency Measures
Per capita cost $0.03 $0.02 $0.03
Effectiveness Measures (desired results)
Work outputs are maintained Yes Yes Yes
FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval.
BOARD ACTION:
338
BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY
AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME HUMAN SERVICES FUND
Area Agency on Aging
BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: (Single Entry Point) 60000-2659
DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: This grant provides case management services to Medicaid
eligible clients.
ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED RECOMMEND
RESOURCES LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY
Personnel Services $ 515,650 $ 527,030 $ 760,840 $ 760,840
Supplies 2,300 1,100 870 870
Purchased Services 83,335 117,210 96,570 96,570
Gross County Cost $ 601,285 $ 645,340 $ 858,280 $ 858,280
Revenue 601,285 645,340 858,280 858,280
Net County Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0
Budget Positions - - - - - - - -
SUMMARY OF CHANGES: Grant funding is up $212,940.
OBJECTIVES: 1)Administer program as defined by CDSS rules and regulations; and 2)Provide
services to eligible clients as specified in the Area Agency on Aging grant approved by the Board.
PERFORMANCE MEASURES
ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED
Work Outputs
Clients served 700 750 800
Efficiency Measures
Per capita cost $2.74 $2.85 $3.68
Effectiveness Measures (desired results)
Divert Medicaid Eligible clients from
Institutional care to cost effective home care 700 700 800
FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval.
BOARD ACTION:
339
BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY
AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: HUMAN SERVICES FUND
BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Federal Transit Grant - - 60000-2662
DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: This grant supplements minibus services to the elderly of the
County.
ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED RECOMMEND
RESOURCES LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY
Personnel Services $ 88,240 $ 88,190 $ 81,080 $ 81,080
Supplies 0 0 0 0
Purchased Services 155,210 40,400 117,920 117,920
Gross County Cost $ 243,450 $ 128,590 $ 199,000 $ 199,000
Revenue 243,450 128,590 199,000 199,000
Net County Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0
Budget Positions - - - - - - - -
SUMMARY OF CHANGES: CDOT funding is up for van purchases.
OBJECTIVES: 1)Administer program as defined by CDOT rules and regulations;and 2)Provide
services to eligible clients as specified in the FTA grant approved by the Board.
PERFORMANCE MEASURES
ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED
Work Outputs
Miles tracked 770,000 770,000 353,500
Efficiency Measures
Per capita cost $1.11 $0.57 $0.86
Effectiveness Measures (desired results)
Passenger trips 76,054 134,000 22,500
FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval.
BOARD ACTION:
340
BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY
AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: HUMAN SERVICES FUND
BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: NEMT Transportation - - 60000-2663
DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: Non-Emergent Medicaid Transit provides medical transportation
for Medicaid clients with broker services.
ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED RECOMMEND
RESOURCES LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY
Personnel Services $ 0 $ 0 $ 28,539 $ 28,539
Supplies 0 0 0 0
Purchased Services 0 0 58,841 58,841
Gross County Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 87,380 $ 87,380
Revenue 0 0 87,380 87,380
Net County Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0
Budget Positions - - - - - - - -
SUMMARY OF CHANGES: New funding source for non-emergent Medicaid transit.
OBJECTIVES: To meet the eligible transportation needs of Medicaid clients. Program reinstated
in 2008 after elimination in 2006.
FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval.
BOARD ACTION:
341
BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY
AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: HUMAN SERVICES FUND
BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Area Agency on Aging (CHIP) - - 60000-2665
DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: This area includes minor sources of funding that supplement
the dental, vision, and hearing programs provided through Area Agency on Aging.
ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED RECOMMEND
RESOURCES LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY
Personnel Services $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0
Supplies 0 0 0 0
Purchased Services 10,000 0 1,600 1,600
Gross County Cost $ 10,000 $ 0 $ 1,600 $ 1,600
Revenue 10,000 0 1,600 1,600
Net County Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0
Budget Positions - - - - - -
SUMMARY OF CHANGES: Activity previously reported in AAA (Other Programs) 6000-2669.
Funding source has indicated funds may not be available in the future.
OBJECTIVES: Supplement other senior programs in Weld County.
PERFORMANCE MEASURES
ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED
Work Outputs
Clients served 25 0 4
Efficiency Measures
Per capita cost $0.02 $0.00 $0.01
Effectiveness Measures (desired results)
Maintain work output goals Yes Yes Yes
FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval.
BOARD ACTION:
342
BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY
AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: HUMAN SERVICES FUND
BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Area Agency on Aging (NMCM) - - 60000-2666
DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: This area includes minor sources of funding that supplement
the aging programs.
ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED RECOMMEND
RESOURCES LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY
Personnel Services $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0
Supplies 0 0 0 0
Purchased Services 7,000 0 3,900 3,900
Gross County Cost $ 7,000 $ 0 $ 3,900 $ 3,900
Revenue 7,000 0 3,900 3,900
Net County Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0
Budget Positions - - - - - - - -
SUMMARY OF CHANGES: Activity previously reported in AAA(Other Programs) 60000-2669.
OBJECTIVES: Supplement other senior programs in Weld County.
PERFORMANCE MEASURES
ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED
Work Outputs
Clients served 0 0 11
Efficiency Measures
Per capita cost $0.02 $0.00 $0.01
Effectiveness Measures (desired results)
Maintain work output goals Yes n/a Yes
FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval.
BOARD ACTION:
343
BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY
AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: HUMAN SERVICES FUND
BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Area Agency on Aging (VALE) - - 60000-2667
DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: This area includes minor sources of funding that supplement
the aging programs.
ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED RECOMMEND
RESOURCES LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY
Personnel Services $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0
Supplies 0 0 0 0
Purchased Services 8,500 0 10,000 10,000
Gross County Cost $ 8,500 $ 0 $ 10,000 $ 10,000
Revenue 8,500 0 10,000 10,000
Net County Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0
Budget Positions - - - - - - - -
SUMMARY OF CHANGES: Activity previously reported in AAA(Other Programs) 60000-2669.
OBJECTIVES: Supplement other senior programs in Weld County.
PERFORMANCE MEASURES
ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED
Work Outputs
Clients served 500 0 600
Efficiency Measures
Per capita cost $0.04 $0.00 $0.05
Effectiveness Measures (desired results)
Maintain work output goals Yes n/a Yes
FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval.
BOARD ACTION:
344
BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY
AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: HUMAN SERVICES FUND
BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Area Agency on Aging(Other Programs)--60000-2669
DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: This area includes minor sources of funding that supplement
the aging programs.
ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED RECOMMEND
RESOURCES LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY
Personnel Services $ 0 $ 8,500 $ 0 $ 0
Supplies 0 360 0 0
Purchased Services 0 17,230 0 0
Gross County Cost $ 0 $ 26,090 $ 0 $ 0
Revenue 0 26,090 0 0
Net County Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0
Budget Positions - - - - - - - -
SUMMARY OF CHANGES: This unit was moved into separate funds for activities previously
posted here. See fund 2666 (NMCM) and 2667 (VALE).
OBJECTIVES: Supplement other senior programs in Weld County.
FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval.
BOARD ACTION:
345
BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY
AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: HUMAN SERVICES FUND
BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Transportation - - 60000-2670
DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION:
ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED RECOMMEND
RESOURCES LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY
Personnel Services $ 0
Supplies 0
Purchased Services 0
Gross County Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0
Revenue 0
Net County Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0
Budget Positions - - - - - - - -
SUMMARY OF CHANGES: Program was discontinued.
OBJECTIVES: 1)Administer program as defined by CDOT rules and regulations;and 2)Provide
services to eligible clients as specified in the FTA grant approved by the Board.
FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: n/a
BOARD ACTION: n/a
346
BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY
AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: HUMAN SERVICES FUND
BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Area Agency on Aging (State Funds) 60000-2671
DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: New supplemental funding source started 7/1/2000. A
combination of HB-1072 funds and General Fund Long Bill monies.
ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED RECOMMEND
RESOURCES LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY
Personnel Services $ 57,975 $ 61,030 $ 60,700 $ 60,700
Supplies 0 0 80 80
Purchased Services 128,732 171,430 271,210 271,210
Gross County Cost $ 186,707 $ 232,460 $ 331,990 $ 331,990
Revenue 186,707 232,460 331,990 331,990
Net County Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0
Budget Positions - - - - - - - -
SUMMARY OF CHANGES: Grant funding level is up $99,530.
OBJECTIVES: 1)Administer program as defined by CDHS/OAA rules and regulations; and 2)
Provide services to eligible clients as specified in the Area Agency on Aging grant approved by the
Board.
PERFORMANCE MEASURES
ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED
Work Outputs
Dental Clients Served 40 40 30
Meals served 3,000 3,000 3,000
Loneliness contacts 2,000 2,000 1,500
Ombudsman clients served 850 850 420
Efficiency Measures
Per capita cost $0.85 $1.03 $1.43
FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval.
BOARD ACTION:
347
BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY
AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: HUMAN SERVICES FUND
BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Medicaid Transportation - - 60000-2672
DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: Non-medical transportation of Single Entry Point clients and
medical transportation for Medicaid clients with broker services.
ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED RECOMMEND
RESOURCES LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY
Personnel Services $ 0 $ 46,910 $ 66,290 $ 66,290
Supplies 0 0 0 0
Purchased Services 46,390 0 0 0
Gross County Cost $ 46,390 $ 46,910 $ 66,290 $ 66,290
Revenue 46,390 46,910 66,290 66,290
Net County Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0
Budget Positions - - - - - - - -
SUMMARY OF CHANGES: Increased caseload for Medicaid transit anticipated from Social
Services.
OBJECTIVES: To meet the eligible transportation needs of Medicaid clients.
FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval.
BOARD ACTION:
348
BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY
AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: HUMAN SERVICES FUND
BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Part E Family Caregiver Support - - 60000-2673
DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: This program provides support to family who are caring for
relatives at home.
ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED RECOMMEND
RESOURCES LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY
Personnel Services $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0
Supplies 0 0 170 170
Purchased Services 73,340 78,810 80,280 80,280
Gross County Cost $ 73,340 $ 78,810 $ 80,450 $ 80,450
Revenue 73,340 78,810 80,450 80,450
Net County Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0
Budget Positions - - - - - - - -
SUMMARY OF CHANGES: Funded at grant award level.
OBJECTIVES: 1) Administer program in accordance with Older American Act Requirements.
PERFORMANCE MEASURES
ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED
Work Outputs
Care giver Support - units of services 3,000 3,000 2,000
Grandparents raising grandkids - clients
served 600 600 400
Efficiency Measures
Per capita cost $0.34 $0.35 $0.35
Effectiveness Measures (desired results)
Maintain requirements of grant Yes Yes Yes
FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval.
BOARD ACTION:
349
BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY
AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: HUMAN SERVICES FUND
BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Supplemental Foods - - 60000-2676
DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: This program distributes USDA commodities to low income
eligible mothers, infants and children, and elderly of the County.
ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED RECOMMEND
RESOURCES LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY
Personnel Services $ 0 $ 1,000 $ 0 $ 0
Supplies 1,196,206 1,413,100 1,220,131 1,220,131
Purchased Services 244,839 265,080 224,728 224,728
Gross County Cost $ 1,441,045 $ 1,679,180 $ 1,444,859 $ 1,444,859
Revenue 1,441,045 1,679,180 1,444,859 1,444,859
Net County Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0
Budget Positions - - - - - - - -
SUMMARY OF CHANGES: Supplemental Foods program was decreased at Federal level,
resulting in a decrease of$234,321. Value of inventory is$1,421,050,and is additional to the total
budget of$1,444,859.
OBJECTIVES: 1) Administer program in accordance with USDA rules and regulations; and 2)
Provide services to eligible clients as specified in the USDA contract approved by the Board.
PERFORMANCE MEASURES
ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED
Work Outputs
Clients served/month 30,000 50,000 30,000
Efficiency Measures
Per capita cost $6,55 $7.41 $6.19
Effectiveness Measures (desired results)
Maintain or increase average monthly
participation rate Yes Yes Yes
FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval.
BOARD ACTION:
350
BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY
AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: HUMAN SERVICES FUND
BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Community Services Block Grant- - 60000-2678
DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: This grant provides a range of community services to the low
income and elderly of the community. It's focus has been on transportation in the rural sites.
ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED RECOMMEND
RESOURCES LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY
Personnel Services $ 56,837 $ 79,127 $ 43,178 $ 43,178
Supplies 0 0 0 0
Purchased Services 212,293 190,003 225,952 225,952
Gross County Cost $ 269,130 $ 269,130 $ 269,130 $ 269,130
Revenue 269,130 269,130 269,130 269,130
Net County Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0
Budget Positions - - - - - - - -
SUMMARY OF CHANGES: No change.
OBJECTIVES: 1)Administer program as defined by DOL rules and regulations; and 2) Provide
services to eligible clients as specified in the CSBG plan approved by the Board.
PERFORMANCE MEASURES
ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED
Work Outputs
Transportation to rural elderly 5,150 5,250 5,250
Volunteer support 1,750 1,750 1,750
Employment opportunities low-income
unskilled adult labor force 1,600 1,700 1,700
Efficiency Measures
Per capita cost $1.23 $1.19 $1.16
Effectiveness Measures (desired results)
Work output goals maintained Yes Yes Yes
FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval.
BOARD ACTION:
351
hiDe
SPECIAL, EVENUE
FUNDS
O ��
SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS
Special Revenue Funds are established to account for taxes or other earmarked revenue of the
county which finance specified activities as required by law or administrative action.
CONTINGENCY FUND:
The Contingency Fund is funded at the level of$8,000,000. Given the uncertainty of state and
federal funding and tax collections, it is recommended that this amount, coupled with the
approximate $2,500,000 carry-over fund balance in the General Fund be retained.
SOLID WASTE FUND:
The Solid Waste Fund is funded at the anticipated revenue level of fees at $635,000, with an
anticipated beginning fund balance of$1,100,000. Funds are committed to offset environmental
health costs: the Household Hazardous Waste Program ($707,377), and trash enforcement and
pickup program ($81,892). A total of$440,000 is designated for roads impacted by landfills.
CONSERVATION TRUST FUND:
The Conservation Trust Fund is budgeted at$405,000 based upon the anticipated operating costs
for 2008. The budget reflects funding of Island Grove Park only.
EMERGENCY RESERVE FUND:
The Emergency Reserve Fund is established per Amendment One(TABOR),passed November 3,
1992. The amendment requires that an emergency reserve be created to be used for declared
emergencies only. It also requires each local government to reserve one percent or more for 1993,
two percent or more for 1994, and three percent or more for all later years of the fiscal year
spending, excluding bonded debt service. Caused reserves apply to the next year's reserve. A
reserve of $5,000,000 has been established for 2008, which is greater than the required three
percent of fiscal spending.
353
CONSERVATION TRUST FUND
SUMMARY OF REVENUES
2008
2007 2008 2008 2008
FUND ORG ACCT ACCOUNT TITLE BUDGET REQUEST RECOMMEND FINAL
INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE
2200 73700 4332 LOTTERY 372,000 396,000 396,000 0
MISCELLANEOUS
2200 73700 4610 EARNINGS ON INVESTMENTS 9,000 9,000 9,000 0
TOTAL CONSERVATION TRUST FUND 381.000 405.000 405.000 0
354
CONSERVATION TRUST FUND
SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES
2007
2007 2008 2008 2008
FUND ORG EXPENDITURE FUNCTION BUDGET REQUEST RECOMMEND FINAL
2200 73700 CONSERVATION TRUST 381,000 405,000 405,000 0
TOTAL CONSERVATION TRUST FUND 381,000 405.000 405,000 0
355
BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY
AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: CONSERVATION TRUST FUND
BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Conservation Trust Fund -- 2200-73700
DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: Accounts for revenue received from the State of Colorado to
be used for the acquisition,development,and maintenance of new conservation sites within Weld
County.
ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED RECOMMEND
RESOURCES LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY
Personnel Services $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0
Supplies 0 0 0 0
Purchased Services 352,837 379,667 392,599 392,599
Fixed Charges 300,000 0 0 0
Capital 0 1,333 12,401 12,401
Gross County Cost $ 652,837 $ 381,000 $ 405,000 $ 405,000
Revenue 462,515 381,000 405,000 405,000
Net County Cost $ 190,322 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0
Budget Positions - - - - - - - -
SUMMARY OF CHANGES: Revenues from the Colorado Lottery are being projected at$396,000
and $9,000 from interest earnings. Island Grove Park will have a gross cost of $471,199, less
$78,600 in revenue,fora net of$392,599,up$12,932 from 2007. Increase is due to increased gas
costs to heat the building. A total of $12,401 is allocated for capital, which is for an automatic
handicap door for the 4-H Building. Since 2002, the Missile Site Park has been funded in the
General Fund.
OBJECTIVES: See criteria following Administrative Recommendation.
356
CONSERVATION TRUST FUND
(CONTINUED)
2200-73700
PERFORMANCE MEASURES
ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED
Work Outputs
Island Grove Park Visitors 410,000 411,000 412,000
Efficiency Measures
Per capita cost (county support) $2.97 $1.68 $1.74
Cost Per Visitor $1.59 $0.92 $0.98
Effectiveness Measures (desired results)
Percentage of increased use 1% 1% 1%
Percentage of increased revenue from user
fees to support parks 2% 0% 2%
FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Historically, the following is the amount
of money received annually since the lottery started:
1983 $ 194,698
1984 195,304
1985 151,033
1986 138,069
1987 162,736
1988 154,074
1989 130,764
1990 136,726
1991 200,103
1992 220,219
1993 264,371
1994 205,534
1995 327,162
1996 312,024
1997 356,262
1998 363,962
1999 286,971
2001 358,802
2002 391,780
2003 385,070
2004 361,926
2005 333,837
2006 453,233
357
CONSERVATION TRUST FUND
(CONTINUED)
2200-73700
FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION(CONTINUED): The funds have been used
for maintenance and development of Island Grove Park and the Missile Site Park,with the exception
of the following items:
Entity Purpose Amount
1983:
Greeley Civic Auditorium $ 141,464
1984:
Greeley Civic Auditorium $ 143,000
1985:
Greeley Civic Auditorium $ 90,000
1986:
Greeley Civic Auditorium $ 51,500
LaSalle Community Center 10,000
Ault Park System 7,500
Dacono Park Improvements 3,000
Windsor Park Improvements 6,000
Ft. Lupton Pearsin Park Sports
Complex 10,000
Independence Stampede Headquarters Facility 5,000
Since 1987a11 funds have gone to the two county parks. Beginning in 2002 only Island Grove
Park has been funded.
In 1984,the Board adopted the following criteria,in priority order,for the use and allocation of Weld
County lottery funds. This policy remains in force today:
1. To maintain and develop the two existing county parks.
2. Projects must enhance the quality of life for the citizens of Weld County.
3. Projects must contribute to or compliment the economic development activities of
Weld County.
4. Projects must have an area impact or significance.
5. Funds used for local community projects must have substantial local support.
6. Outside of existing county parks, no operating funds shall be contributed to projects.
358
CONSERVATION TRUST FUND
(CONTINUED)
2200-73700
FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION(CONTINUED):
Capital item requested is an automatic door($12,401). Recommend approval.
ITEM REQUESTED RECOMMENDED
Undesignated $ 12,401 $ 12.401
$ 12,401 $ 12.401
BOARD ACTION:
359
CONTINGENT FUND
SUMMARY OF REVENUES
2008
2007 2008 2008 2008
FUND ORG ACCT ACCOUNT TITLE BUDGET REQUEST RECOMMEND FINAL
TAXES
2300 90300 4112 CURRENT PROPERTY TAXES 2,600,000 2,600,000 2,600,000 0
TOTAL CONTINGERNT FUND 2.600.000 2.600.000 2.600.000 0
360
CONTINGENT FUND
SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES
2007
2007 2008 2008 2008
FUND ORG EXPENDITURE FUNCTION BUDGET REQUEST RECOMMEND FINAL
2300 90300 CONTINGENT 5,450,000 8,000,000 8,000,000 0
TOTAL CONTINGENT FUND 5,450,000 8,000,000 8,000,000 0
361
BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY
AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: CONTINGENCY FUND
BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Contingency Fund -- 2300-90300
DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: The Contingency Fund exists to cover reasonably unforeseen
expenditures or revenue short-falls.
ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED RECOMMEND
RESOURCES LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY
Personnel Services $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0
Supplies 0 0 0 0
Purchased Services 0 0 0 0
Fixed Charges 3,300,000 5,450,000 8,000,000 8,000,000
Capital 0 0 0 0
Gross County Cost $ 3,300,000 $ 5,450,000 $ 8,000,000 $ 8,000,000
Revenue/Fund Bal. 2,006,341 2,850,000 5,400,000 5,400,000
Net County Cost $ 1,293,659 $ 2,600,000 $ 2,600,000 $ 2,600,000
Budget Positions - - - - - - - -
SUMMARY OF CHANGES: The Contingency Fund is funded at the level of $8,000,000 by a
carry-over fund balance of$5,400,000 and property taxes of$2,600,000.
OBJECTIVES: n/a
FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the amount of
$8,000,000 and the Emergency Reserve of$5,000,000 provide adequate reserves for the county
and should be retained.
BOARD ACTION:
362
EMERGENCY RESERVE FUND
SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES
2007
2007 2008 2008 2008
FUND ORG EXPENDITURE FUNCTION BUDGET REQUEST RECOMMEND FINAL
2400 53100 EMERGENCY RESERVE 4,000,000 5,000,000 5,000,000 0
TOTAL EMERGENCY RESERVE FUND 4,000,000 5,000,000 5.000,000 0
363
BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY
AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: EMERGENCY RESERVE FUND
BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Emergency Reserve -- 2400-53100
DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: The Emergency Reserve Fund is established per Amendment
One (TABOR), passed November 3, 1992, which requires that an emergency reserve be
established to be used for declared emergencies only,and that each local government shall reserve
for 19931 percent or more,for 1994 2 percent or more,and for all later years 3 percent or more of
the fiscal year spending,excluding bonded debt service. Caused reserves apply to the next year's
reserve.
ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED RECOMMEND
RESOURCES LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY
Personnel Services $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0
Supplies 0 0 0 0
Purchased Services 0 0 0 0
Fixed Charges 0 4,000,000 5,000,000 5,000,000
Capital 0 0 0 0
Gross County Cost $ 0 $ 4,000,000 $ 5,000,000 $ 5,000,000
Revenue 0 0 0 0
Net County Cost $ 0 $ 4,000,000 $ 5,000,000 $ 5,000,000
Budget Positions - - - - - - - -
SUMMARY OF CHANGES: The emergency reserve is funded at $5,000,000, which meets the
three percent fiscal year spending requirement.
OBJECTIVES: n/a
FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that $5,000,000 be
funded to comply with the TABOR Amendment requirement passed in 1992. Reserve is funded
from carry-over fund balance.
BOARD ACTION:
364
SOLID WASTE FUND
SUMMARY OF REVENUES
2008
2007 2008 2008 2008
FUND ORG ACCT ACCOUNT TITLE BUDGET REQUEST RECOMMEND FINAL
CHARGE FOR SERVICES
2700 90200 4410 CHARGE FOR SERVICES 1,375,000 635,000 635,000 0
TOTAL SOLID WASTE FUND 1.375.000 635.000 635.000 0
365
SOLID WASTE FUND
SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES
2007
2007 2008 2008 2008
FUND ORG EXPENDITURE FUNCTION BUDGET REQUEST RECOMMEND FINAL
2700 21240 TRANSFER 81,892 81,892 81,892 0
2700 90200 SOLID WASTE 585,731 440,000 440,000 0
2700 90200 TRANSFER 707,377 707,377 707,377 0
TOTAL SOLID WASTE FUND 1,375.000 1,229,269 1,229,269 0
366
BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY
AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: SOLID WASTE
BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Code Enforcement -- 2700-21240
DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: This budget accounts for code enforcement for littering, illegal
dumping, and roadside trash pick-up program.
ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED RECOMMEND
RESOURCES LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY
Personnel Services $ 29,383 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0
Supplies 22 0 0 0
Purchased Services 20,055 0 0 0
Fixed Charges 0 81,892 81,892 81,892
Gross County Cost $ 49,460 $ 81,892 $ 81,892 $ 81,892
Revenue 0 0 0 0
Net County Cost $ 49,460 $ 81,892 $ 81,892 $ 81,892
Budget Positions - - - - - - - -
SUMMARY OF CHANGES: The Code Enforcement function has been combined with the Animal
Control function in the Sheriff's Office. As a result,this budget unit reimburses that budget unit for
Code Enforcement costs associated with trash. See budget unit number 1000-21230 for a detailed
discussion of the change in the program.
OBJECTIVES: 1)Mitigate the impact of solid waste sites in Weld County;and 2)Provide roadside
trash pick-up and enforcement.
367
CODE ENFORCEMENT
(CONTINUED)
2700-21240
PERFORMANCE MEASURES
ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED
Work Outputs
Number of Complaints 775 790 800
Efficiency Measures
Per capita cost (county support) $0.225 $0.361 $0.351
Effectiveness Measures (desired results)
Reduced roadside litter 90% 90% 90%
FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval.
BOARD ACTION:
368
BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY
AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: SOLID WASTE
BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Solid Waste Fund -- 2700-90200
DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: This fund accounts for revenue received from a surcharge on
dumping fees at solid waste disposal sites to combat environmental problems,promote trash clean-
up, provide for the household hazardous materials program, and to further improve and develop
landfill sites within the county.
ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED RECOMMEND
RESOURCES LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY
Personnel Services $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0
Supplies 0 0 0 0
Purchased Services 154,706 1,272,725 1,147,377 1,147,377
Fixed Charges 1,244,860 20,383 0 0
Capital 0 0 0 0
Gross County Cost $ 1,399,566 $ 1,293,108 $ 1,147,377 $ 1,147,377
Revenue 1,252,507 1,375,000 635,000 635,000
Net County Cost $ 147,059 $ -81,892 $ 512,377 $ 512,377
Budget Positions - - - - - - - -
SUMMARY OF CHANGES: Revenues are down $740,000. Due to the annexation of the Erie
Laidlaw landfill,the revenue from that site($740,000 annually)will no longer be received after 2007.
Department of Public Health and Environment costs for the Household Hazardous Waste program
will be$707,377. $440,000 is requested for road projects to mitigate landfill impacts. In 2008 the
fund balance will be reduced $594,269.
OBJECTIVES: 1) Mitigate the impact of solid waste sites in Weld County; and 2) Provide
Household Hazardous Materials Program.
369
SOLID WASTE FUND
(CONTINUED)
2700-90200
PERFORMANCE MEASURES
ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED
Work Outputs
Landfill Inspections 45 45 45
Household Hazardous Material (HHM) $707,377 $707,377 $707,377
Surcharge Collected $1,252,507 $1,375,000 $635,000
Efficiency Measures
Per capita cost(collected) $6.36 $6.07 $5.27
Per capita HHM cost $3.22 $3.12 $3.03
Effectiveness Measures (desired results)
Community Clean-ups 4 4 2
Increased volume of HHM diverted from
landfills 9% 10% 10%
FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. There are no
undesignated funds in the 2008 budget to mitigate impacts of landfills, such as road access,
cleanups,and transfer stations. A$500,000 fund balance also exists for the same needs if required.
As indicated above, revenues have been held conservative. Due to the annexation of the second
Erie landfill,the county will be losing the revenue from that site. Erie will pay approximately$13,000
for Health Department inspections of the landfill in Erie, and for costs to offset the receiving of
household hazardous wastes from Erie residents.
It will be necessary in future years to eliminate the$440,000 contributed toward road impacts,and
reduce the Household Hazardous Waste program to half the revenue,or approximately$325,000.
Due to the available fund balance,2008 can be used as a transition year to the lower funding level.
BOARD ACTION:
370
CAPITAL
FUND
It
'^
I7
SEVEN YEAR TREND
Capital Expenditures
14
13.21
,i
-s
12 II.it:O -
�5a
4 'i
N ;fir;
4" i
il
ElQiE
10 - -
8.72
8 8,'1,..5F.f _. ___. - ___..____-- ____ �iq' __. 7.54
CO Z Alit:
<
O 6.63
J
g 6.38
6 ' ° ' __ ___ —_- __
+i'
:",:. 3.79 ° 1 .ii
si
2.26
PlY.I',;..Y.., ,
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2006
371
CAPITAL EXPENDITURES FUND SUMMARY
The Capital Expenditures Fund was established to budget for financial resources used for the
acquisition or improvement of the capital facilities of the county. A detailed Long Range Capital Plan
for 2008-2012 is presented in this section and relates to the specifics of the 2008 capital project
budget.
The Capital Expenditures Fund accounts for various capital improvement projects for county
buildings. The 2008 program is funded at$7,535,000,with$6,000,000 from property tax,$250,000
from capital expansion fees, $750,000 from an Energy impact grant, and $35,000 from interest.
Anticipated projects include$6,000,000 for another Social Services Building,$250,000 for remodels
and upgrades of Public Works facilities,and $100,000 for special projects. Carry-over beginning
fund balance of$500,000 is anticipated,and$1,185,000 ending reserve fund balance is anticipated
at the end of 2008.
Capital projects impacting the 2008 and future years operational costs include Phase IIl of the jail
that will be opened January 1,2008. The additional 374-bed facility will be phased into use with 252
beds used in 2008,and the remainder opened in 2009. It is estimated that operational costs for the
jail will increase approximately$3.4 million over the two year period. The addition of a 40,000 square
foot additional Social Services Building will add operational costs for the building of$120,000 in
2009. Staff for the operations on the facility will come from shifting staff from departments in
Greeley offices and operations.
The special projects and Public Works facilities projects are primarily cosmetic enhancements to
buildings that will not impact operating costs, but will improve the appearance and functionality of
the buildings involved.
372
CAPITAL EXPENDITURES FUND
SUMMARY OF REVENUES
2008
2007 2008 2008 2008
FUND ORG ACCT ACCOUNT TITLE BUDGET REQUEST RECOMMEND FINAL
TAXES
4000 17500 4112 CURRENT PROPERTY TAXES 5,875,000 6,000,000 6,000,000 0
INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE
4000 17500 4340 GRANTS 0 750,000 750,000 0
MISCELLANEOUS
4000 17500 4610 EARNINGS ON INVESTMENTS 100,000 35,000 35,000 0
FEES
4000 17500 4730 OTHER FEES 400,000 250,000 250,000 0
TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURE FUND 6,375.000 7.035.000 7.035.000 0
373
CAPITAL EXPENDITURES FUND
SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES
2007
2007 2008 2008 2008
FUND ORG EXPENDITURE FUNCTION BUDGET REQUEST RECOMMEND FINAL
4000 17500 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT AND ACQUISITION 6,375,000 7,535,000 7,535,000 0
TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURE FUND 6,375.000 7,535,000 7,535,000 0
374
BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY
AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Capital Expenditures -- 4000-17500
DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: Capital projects for general county use. Created in accordance
with C. R. S. 29-1-301(1.2) April 5, 1984. Formerly Public Works - County Buildings Fund
(Fund 33).
ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED RECOMMEND
RESOURCES LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY
Personnel Services $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0
Supplies 0 0 0 0
Purchased Services 0 0 0 0
Capital 21,228,712 6,375,000 7,535,000 7,535,000
Gross County Cost $ 21,228,712 $ 6,375,000 $ 7,535,000 $ 7,535,000
Revenue 11,949,234 500,000 1,035,000 1,035,000
Fund Balance 3,715,970 0 500,000 500,000
Net County Cost $ 5,563,508 $ 5,875,000 $ 6,000,000 $ 6,000,000
Budget Positions -- -- -- --
SUMMARY OF CHANGES: The Capital Expenditures Fund accounts for various capital
improvement projects for county buildings. The 2008 program is funded at $7,535,000, with
$6,000,000 from property tax, $250,000 from capital expansion fees, $750,000 from an Energy
Impact Grant,and$35,000 from interest. Anticipated projects include$4,000,000 for another Social
Services Building,$250,000 for remodels and upgrades of Public Works facilities,and$100,000 for
special projects. Carry-over beginning fund balance of$500,000 is anticipated, and $1,185,000
ending reserve fund balance is anticipated at the end of 2008.
OBJECTIVES: n/a
FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Budget reflects the 2008 funding level of
the Proposed Long Range Capital Plan for 2008 - 2012. The actual plan is on the pages
immediately following.
BOARD ACTION:
375
A‘ef":,
hiDe�„
WELD COUNTY
LONG RANGE CAPITAL PROJECTS
FIVE-YEAR PLAN
2008 - 2012
Presented By: Donald D. Warden, Director
Finance and Administration
September, 2007
377
LONG RANGE CAPITAL PROJECTS
FIVE YEAR PLAN
2008 - 2012
INTRODUCTION:
Section 14-3 of the Weld County Home Rule Charter provides:
"The Board may require that the Director of Finance and Purchasing submit, at the
time of submission of the annual budget,a five-year capital improvements program
and budget. Such program shall include recommended projects, construction
schedule,estimate of cost,anticipated revenue sources, methods of financing,and
such other information as may be required."
This five-year plan projects capital improvements for 2008 - 2012.
The recommended program for capital construction is intended as a guideline to be adjusted by the
Board of County Commissioners on an annual basis. It represents flexible goals for organizing
solutions to county program needs, and it is intended to provide the Board of County
Commissioners with the perspective for making fiscal policy decisions. Annual modifications in the
plan will reflect necessary adjustments and priorities,changes in programs,and readjustments of
other county fiscal requirements.
This report has four(4) sections:
1. Introduction
2. Financing Alternatives
3. 2008 - 2012 Five-year Plan
4. 2008 Budgetary Impact
The section on financing recommends a program for funding the next five years' capital
construction. This section lists the various sources of revenue currently available to the county,and
the alternatives available for financing the remainder of the capital projects program. The
2008-2012 five-year plan section provides a list of recommended projects and the time schedule
for the next five fiscal years. Additionally, it provides justification for the recommendation and
attempts to enumerate problems and recommended solutions for the capital improvements
program over the next five years. The project section describes each recommended project,and
provides information on the existing situation,the proposed solution,and the financing plan for each
project.
The last section of the report provides a recommended 2008 budget for the capital construction
program. It provides specific detail regarding each recommended project and the impact on the
2008 county budget.
378
FINANCING ALTERNATIVES
379
FINANCING
Overview:
There are a number of ways to finance capital improvement projects. Some of the most common
methods are:
1. Pay as you go:
Pay as you go is a method of financing capital projects with current revenues --
paying cash instead of borrowing against future revenues. Pay as you go has
several advantages. First, it saves interest cost. Second, pay as you go protects
borrowing capacity for unforeseen major outlays that are beyond any current year's
capacity. Third, when coupled with regular, steady completion of capital
improvements and good documentation and publicity, pay as you go fosters
favorable bond ratings when long term financing is undertaken. Finally, the
technique avoids the inconvenience and considerable cost associated with
marketing of bond issues, advisors, counsel, printing, etc.
However,there are practical and theoretical disadvantages to a pay as you go policy.
First, pay as you go puts a heavy burden on the project year. Second, it creates
awkward fluctuating expenditure cycles which do not occur with extended financing.
Third,a long life asset should be paid for by its users throughout its normal life rather
than all at once by those who may not have the use of it for the full term. Finally,
when inflation is driving up construction costs,it may be cheaper to borrow and pay
today's prices rather than wait and pay tomorrow's.
2. All borrowing policy:
An all borrowing policy or a substantial reliance on debt financing is another
approach. The annual available resources could be used entirely for debt service
with the size of the annual resources setting the limit on the amount that could be
borrowed.
3. Capital reserve:
A capital reserve plan is an approach where the annual resources available could be
accumulated in one or more capital reserve funds,the amounts invested,and when
any funds become adequate to pay for a proposed project, the fund could be
expended. This is a good approach when a county has a capital requirement which
can wait. Accumulation of the necessary capital funds over a period of time is a
feasible approach,assuming a relatively stable construction dollar. HB1111 passed
in 1982 specifically provides for a capital improvements trust fund for capital
reserves.
380
4. Partial pay as you go policy:
A partial pay as you go policy is a common approach. Some of the annual
resources would be used to finance capital improvements directly, and the
remainder would go for supporting a debt program. Even if a local government
pursues a borrowing policy, an initial down payment out of current revenues is a
possibility. A customary five to ten percent down is a limited pay as you go policy,
and assures that the voters authorizing the approval will make a cash contribution
so all of the burden will not be postponed.
5. Joint financing:
An ever increasing number of cities and counties are benefitting from joint
development of a project. The construction of a city/county office building and
recreational areas are examples. This avenue of funding and planning capital
projects normally is advantageous to both jurisdictions.
6. Lease/Purchase:
Local governments can utilize lease/purchase methods for needed public works
projects by having it constructed by a private company or authority. The facility is
then leased by the jurisdiction on an annual or a monthly rental. At the end of the
lease period, the title to the facility can be conveyed to the jurisdiction without any
future payments. The rental over the years will have paid the total original cost plus
interest. This method has been used successfully in a numberofjurisdictions. The
utilization of a building authority would fall under this category of financing.
Numerous considerations are involved in the selection of the foregoing approaches, or some
combination thereof:
1. Political realities may preclude utilization of one or more of the above alternatives.
For example, the passage of general obligation bonds as a debt financing
mechanism has not met recent success at the polling places in most jurisdictions.
2. The pay as you go concept has three distinct advantages.
A. It provides great flexibility to the county for future periods of economic
recession or depression but does not accumulate large fixed-charge costs.
B. It avoids the payment of interest charges.
C. It imposes upon public officials the full political responsibility for levy of the
taxes necessary to pay the local share of such projects.
3. The debt financing approach has the advantage of spreading the cost over a
generation of current users of public facilities, thereby imposing upon each a
significant portion of the cost of each project.
4. In an inflationary period,one must take into account the extent to which prepayment
for capital outlay is warranted, when the opportunity for repayment of the principal
and interest in dollars that are less expensive can be arranged.
381
5. During periods of rapid rise in costs,the time delay necessary to accumulate down
payments or full pay as you go resources invites higher costs which may wipe out
most, if not all, of the advantages of non-payment of interest.
In the five-year capital projects plan, a combination of funding methods will be recommended to
finance capital construction in an attempt to balance the economy of a payment in full program with
the fairness of sharing the burden among present and future taxpayers.
This recommended financial program reflects consideration of many factors, including the
availability of cash,anticipated interest rates at the time of construction,and projected inflationary
cost increases that would result from project delays.
382
DEBT FINANCING
Before discussing specific types of borrowing, it is appropriate to review some of the basic
constitutional statutory provisions which generally are applicable to debt financing.
Article XI,Section 6 of the Colorado Constitution provides that no debt may be created by a political
subdivision of the state,unless the question of incurring such debt has been approved bya majority
of the qualified electorate voting. Any obligation paid,or contracted to be paid,out of a fund that is
a product of a tax levy is a debt within the means of the Constitution (Trinidad vs. Haxby, 136
Colorado 168, 315 p 2d 204 -- 1957).
In addition to voter approval, Article XI, Section 6 requires the debt be incurred by adoption of a
legislative measure which is irrevocable until the indebtedness is fully paid or discharged. The
ordinance must:
1. Set forth the purpose for which the bond proceeds will be applied, and
2. Provide for the levy of the tax which, together with such other revenues as may be
pledged, will be sufficient to pay the principal and interest of the debt.
The Constitution delegates to the Legislature the duty to establish statutory limitations on the
incurrence of debt. The total amount of debt which a county may incur may not exceed 3 percent
of the assessed value in the county, which is slightly over$108 million dollars in Weld County.
Section 4 of Article X, Section 20 (TABOR Amendment) requires voter approval for any form of
multi-year debt. It states that an election is required: "Except for the refinancing of district bonded
debt at a lower interest rate or adding new employees to existing district pension plans,creation of
any multiple-fiscal year director indirect district debt or other financial obligation whatsoever without
adequate present cash reserves pledged irrevocable and held for payments in all future fiscal
years."
In addition to the state statute, Section 14-6 of the Weld County Home Rule Charter specifies:
"The incurring of indebtedness by the county and the issuance of evidences of such
indebtedness shall be authorized,made and executed in accordance with the laws
of the state, including the borrowing of money to fund county projects,the pledging
of project revenues and repayment thereof,and the issuance of revenue warrants,
or revenue bonds, or other forms of evidence of such obligations."
Before discussing specific types of bonds, it is appropriate to review some of the general
characteristics of bonds. Bonds mature serially,that is,a portion of the principal is retired over the
entire term of the bond issue. Interest on municipal bonds is free from Federal Income Tax which
is an important feature to prospective purchasers. The term or the length of time to maturity of
municipal bonds can vary considerably. Generally,the last maturing bond comes due ten to thirty
years from the date of issue. Normally, the longer the maturity of the bonds, the higher the yields
or return on investment demanded by the market price. Thus, a bond issue that runs thirty years
will pay a higher net effective interest rate than a bond issue that runs twenty years.
383
General Obligation Bonds:
General obligation bonds are secured by a pledge of the full faith, credit and taxing power of the
county. The county is obligated to levy sufficient taxes each year to pay the principal and interest
of the bond issue. Consequently,general obligation bonds are a debt subject to the constitutional
and statutory provisions discussed earlier. Because the issue of general obligation bond pledges
its full faith and credit and agrees to levy the ad valorem taxes necessary to repay the principal and
interest of the bond,it is generally agreed to be a more secure investment than other types of bonds.
Thus, the major advantage of general obligation financing is the low rate of interest as compared
to the interest of other types of bonds. The law permits general obligation bonds to have a thirty-
year term; however, general obligation bond issues usually have terms of twenty years or less.
General obligation bonds, in addition to being secured by full faith and credit of the issuer, may
provide additional security by pledging certain available revenues.
The major disadvantage of general obligation bonds is the fact that it does require voter approval
prior to issuance. Voter resistance to increased taxes may prevent a successful bond election.
Revenue Bonds:
Revenue bonds are nota debt in the constitutional sense. They are secured by the revenue derived
from the project to be constructed, not by pledge of the full faith, credit, and taxing authority of the
county. Projects typically financed by revenue bonds include airports,stadiums,and park facilities.
Under the TABOR Amendment, revenue bonds can only be used for enterprise funds and
operations.
Although it may seem possible to pledge any non-tax revenues for payment of revenue bonds,there
should be a relationship between the type of revenue pledged for payment of the bonds and the
project to be financed. Although revenue bonds need not comply with the constitutional statutory
provisions generally applicable to a debt,there are several statutory provisions which may affect the
issuance of certain types of revenue bonds and the statutes should be consulted for specific
provisions regarding the issue of revenue bonds if this method is considered.
Revenue bonds are considered to be less secure than general obligation bonds because of the
inability of the issuer to levy taxes to assure the payment of principal and interest. Thus, there is
normally a higher interest rate on revenue bonds. The term of revenue bonds is often beyond twenty
years, frequently as long as thirty years.
The concept of issuing revenue bonds is based on the theory that certain projects which benefit only
certain individuals should be self-supporting and should be paid for by the user of that project rather
than the populace as a whole. Thus,airport revenue bonds are paid for by air travelers and airlines
and parking revenue bonds are paid for by users, etc.
In order for a county to issue a revenue bond, the system which generates the revenues to repay
the principal and interest of the bond must:
1. Have a good operating history documented by audited figures.
2. Reflect good debt service coverage through use of a feasibility study
completed by a recognized expert in the field.
384
In analyzing a revenue bond issue for underwriting, an investment banker will look not only at
operating statistics and coverages, but also at more basic elements, such as the necessity of the
service,control over competition,and delinquency procedures. Revenue bonds are becoming more
popular because they do not require voter approval and do not apply in statutory debt limits.
Leases:
A less traditional method of financing county facilities is a lease arrangement. A lease is executed
with the county,which gives the county the option to purchase the equipment or facility during the
term of the lease. All or part of the lease payments may be applied to the purchase prices.
A bona fide lease option agreement is not a debt; however,an installment purchase program is a
debt. A bona fide lease/option agreement is characterized by two factors:
1. Annual rental payments with automatic renewal of the lease unless
terminated by either party, and
2. No obligation on the part of the local government to purchase the property if
the lease is terminated.
Also,some court cases indicate the annual rental must be paid from non-property tax revenues to
avoid the lease being considered a general obligation. Upon exercise of the option, the local
government obtains full legal title to the property. Leases of this nature are distinctively different
from more conventional means of financing. Of primary importance is the security which underlies
the lease period. It is not a promise to levy taxes ora pledge of revenues from the system. Rather,
it is usually a promise to pay only one year at a time,with an implied intention to continue payment
until ownership is transferred. As ultimate security, the holder of the lease may look to the asset
which is being leased in the event of a default.
There is little statutory or judicial guidance in the area of leases of this type, and the obligation to
continue lease payments until title transfers is a moral, rather than a legal obligation. As a
consequence, the underwriting or placement of a lease is more difficult than the underwriting of
conventional bonds. The term of the leases generally are short, usually from seven to ten years.
Because the security underlying the lease is not good compared with conventional financing,
interest rates on leases are higher.
Building Authority:
A building authority is a non-profit corporation which generally is formed at the request of the
governing body of the county or local jurisdiction,which also appoints the Board of Directors of the
corporation. Weld County created such an authority in 1987 named the Weld County Finance
Corporation. The directors are the Director of Finance and Administration, County Attorney, and
Director of General Services, each appointed for ten year terms.
385
The building authority issues its own bonds to finance a facility. To achieve the same lower interest
rates that traditional municipal bonds enjoy, the building authority must obtain a ruling from the
Internal Revenue Service that the interest on the authority's bonds is exempt from Federal Income
Tax. Such an exemption is granted if the IRS finds the authority's bonds are issued on behalf of a
political subdivision, which is determined based upon the following factors as detailed in IRS
Revenue Ruling 63-20.
1. The authority engages in activities which are essentially public in nature.
2. The corporation is not organized for profit.
3. The corporate income does not inure to the benefit of any private person.
4. The political subdivision has a beneficial interest in the corporation, while the
indebtedness is outstanding, and it obtains full legal title to the property on the
retirement of the debt.
5. The corporation has been approved by the political subdivision which has approved
the specific obligation of the corporation.
Like municipal bonds, bonds issued by a corporation usually are subject to registration and other
requirements of the Securities Act of 1933 and the Security Exchange Act of 1934. After receiving
a favorable ruling from the IRS, a "no action" letter should be secured from the Security and
Exchange Commission, exempting the authority's bonds from these requirements. The authority
then issues bonds pledging the annual rental payments as security. After issuance of bonds and
construction of the facilities,the authority leases the facilities to the county. Again, this must be a
bona fide lease and possess all the elements discussed under Lease/Purchase.
The bonds of a building authority are similar to municipal leases in the manner in which they are
viewed by investors. As with a simple municipal lease,building authority bonds are less secure than
general obligation or revenue bonds. As a result, bonds issued through a building authority bear
higher interest than more secure issues.
Certificates of Participation (COP) may be issued in the same manner as bonds. As a practical
matter the COP is the same as a bond, except from a legal point of view, the COP is evidencing
assignment of proportionate undivided interests in rights to receive certain revenues in the form of
a lease or rental amount for the purpose of providing funding for capital improvements. The lease
and COP do not constitute a general obligation or other indebtedness of the county within the
meaning of any constitutional, statutory or home rule charter debt limitation. The lease is a
year-to-year obligation.
The use of Certificates of Participation(COP)has been the only debt vehicle Weld County has ever
used in the implementation of its debt policy options. The only COP issued by Weld County was
done in 1997, and was paid off August 1, 2007. No outstanding debt exists for Weld County.
386
BUILDING AUTHORITY FINANCE
The Philosophy:
Tax-exempt financing is available through a building authority with the issuance of bonds when the
facilities financed are for public purposes and the benefit is to the sponsoring public entity.
The Building Authority:
A building authority is a Colorado non-profit corporation created by the county itself. The county
adopts a resolution calling for the creation of the Building Authority and directing counsel to draw
articles of incorporation and by-laws in compliance with Colorado Statutes. A board of directors is
formed. The board may consist of County Commissioners or administrative personnel or
individuals not associated with any public entity. The Weld County Finance Corporation,created
in 1987,consists of the Director of Finance/Administration,County Attorney,and Director of General
Services as directors.
Tax-Exemption of Interest:
Once the non-profit corporation is created, the tax-exempt nature of interest paid on the
corporation's bonds must be assured. A revenue ruling is requested from the Internal Revenue
Service on the non-profit status of the corporation pursuant to Internal Revenue Code, 103(a)1 and
Revenue Ruling 63-20, and on the tax-exempt status of interest paid.
Such an application involves considerable work and a detailed analysis of the situation which is
presented to the Internal Revenue Service. The application includes information as to public
purpose, the county, the agency using the facilities, the proposed lease terms, terms of title
reversion to the county and the proposed method of financing.
Corporate Bonds and the S.E.C.:
As corporate bonds are subject to registration requirements of the Securities and Exchange
Commission,a"no action"letter must be obtained from the S.E.C. In essence,the S.E.C.says that
no action will be taken if the bonds of the building authority/non-profit corporation are not registered.
The Purchase Contract:
Once the building authority is created with powers to act, it may enter into a contract to purchase
the facility. The contract should be subject to:
1. A favorable revenue ruling from the Internal Revenue Service.
2. Receipt of an S.E.C. "no action" letter.
3. Finalization of financing.
387
The Bond Issue:
When all legal and tax questions are answered the building authority may issue bonds for the
purchase of the facility. Normally the bonds are sold directly to an underwriter who then resells the
bonds to the ultimate investor.
The bonds that are issued will be an obligation of the building authority only and nota debt obligation
of the county.
The County Lease:
Upon the issuance of the bonds and the purchase of the building by the building authority,the county
can lease the building from the authority. The lease would be from year-to-year with automatic
renewal unless otherwise terminated. A county lease for any period in excess of one year
constitutes a debt and must be approved by voters.
The Bond Security:
The security of the bond holders may be only in a pledge of lease revenues by the authority. The
bond holders may also have a first mortgage lien on the building. The combination of the two results
in a more secure bond and a correspondingly lower rate of interest.
Partial Seller Financing:
Depending on factors such as the seller's motivation, whether there is an existing loan on the
building,and negotiations,a bond issue can be for only the amount necessaryfora down payment.
The sellers can carry back the balance,receiving installment sale tax benefits on the capital gains.
A revenue ruling would be required, however, interest paid on a promissory note to the seller may
also be tax exempt. The total cost to the county and the building authority then may be substantially
lower on this basis.
388
COMPLETED CAPITAL PROJECTS
2002 - 2006
Actual Actual Actual Actual Actual
Requirements Total 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
Centennial Complex $ 3,784,729 $ 35,528 $ 260,851 $2,457,424 $1,009,526 $ 21,400
Courthouse 313,178 48,735 264,443
West Annex 190,633 179,783 10,850
Downtown Parking /
Future Expansion 1,805,731 1,015,519 748,333 41,879
Planning Building 495,727 495,727
Grader Sheds 313,300 161,374 151,926
Human Services 34,455 34,455
Head Start 210,792 210,792
Health Department 17,576 17,576
Island Grove 969,493 136,704 34,717 44,627 753,445
Jail 17,823,450 4,052,834 5,053,255 265,562 269,087 8,182,712
Sheriff's Admin Bldg 2,902,333 2,870,111 32,222
No. County Complex 2,087,561 178,554 1,909,007
Public Works 154,969 101,959 53,010
Social Services 17,546 17,546
Southwest Complex 384,599 360,682 23,917
Southeast Complex 4,070,614 206,432 1,371,376 2,492,806
Training Center 22,136 11,068 11,068
North Admin Bldg 2,128,789 929,713 1,199,076
Miscellaneous 987,066 28,624 148,844 500,073 309,525
$ 38,714,677 $8,717,908 $5,875,889 $6,582,520 $4,497,990 $13,040,370
389
FIVE YEAR
CAPITAL PROJECTS PROGRAMS
2008 - 2012
Requirements Total 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Capital Reserve $17,835,000 $1,185,000 $6,050,000 $1,950,000 $5,275,000 $2,900,000
Jail Expansion 0
SW Administration 4,000,000 4,000,000
Storage Garage 0
Courts 1,500,000 1,500,000
Social Services 6,000,000 6,000,000
Administration Bldg 5,000,000 5,000,000
Miscellaneous
Projects 500,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000
SS Parking 0
Grader Shed 0
PW Projects 750,000 250,000 250,000 250,000
Alternative Programs
Bldg 0
$35,585,000 $ 7,535,000 $6,400,000 $7,300,000 $6,875,000 $7,000,000
390
RESOURCE CAPACITY
*****************
FUNDING SOURCES
*****************
CASH FLOW ANALYSIS
391
CAPITAL EXPENDITURES FUND
RESOURCE CAPACITY
2008 - 2012
PROPERTY GRANTS INTEREST FEES TOTAL
TAX
2008 $ 6,000,000 $ 750,000 $ 35,000 $ 250,000 $ 7,035,000
2009 6,000,000 0 100,000 300,000 6,400,000
2010 6,000,000 800,000 200,000 300,000 7,300,000
2011 6,000,000 750,000 300,000 300,000 7,350,000
2012 6,000,000 0 600,000 400,000 7,000,000
392
CASH FLOW ANALYSIS
BEGINNING ENDING
FUND REVENUE RESOURCES FUND
BALANCE EXPENDITURES BALANCE
2008 $ 500,000 $ 7,035,000 $ 7,535,000 $ 6,350,000 $ 1,185,000
2009 1,185,000 6,400,000 7,585,000 350,000 $ 7,235,000
2010 7,235,000 7,300,000 14,535,000 5,350,000 $ 9,185,000
2011 9,185,000 7,350,000 16,535,000 1,600,000 $ 14,935,000
2012 14,935,000 7,000,000 21,935,000 4,100,000 $ 17,835,000
393
CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Existing Situation:
The Centennial Complex Jail was constructed in 1978, and was remodeled three times to
increase the capacity to 294 beds. In 1997, Phase I of the North Jail Complex was constructed
with 160 beds,and all the core service facilities. The North Jail Complex is currently designed for
a build out of 640 beds, but the site can accommodate a 960-bed facility. Each phase would be
in increments of approximately 160-226 beds. Jail population continues to grow in Weld County.
Phase II has been completed and opened in January,2004. Phase II added 226 beds based upon
the design. Construction of Phase II allowed for the closure of the Centennial Jail and conversion
of the space to accommodate Court needs. Phase III which added 374 beds,was constructed in
2006 - 2007, and will be opened January 2008.
Proposed Solution:
It is proposed that additional phases of the North Jail Complex be constructed in increments of 160
-226 beds asneeded. The total project of approximately 211,355 square feet will be constructed
in phases. The first phase constructed in 1997 was 125,775 square feet. It included the core
service facilities, such as kitchen, administrative offices, medical detention, booking area, and
lobby to accommodate 640 inmates. Phase II has 226 beds and is both maximum and medium
security to accommodate the projected inmate classifications. Phase II was constructed in the
2002-2003 time frame and became fully operational as of 2004. Phase Ill has 374 beds and was
constructed in 2006 - 2007.
Financing:
It is recommended that the county budget$17,835,000 in the 2008-2012 capital plan budget for
350 additional beds. In addition, $3,000,000 for operation of the additional jail must be
programmed into the operational budget plan for 2013. Nothing will be in the Capital budget in
2008 for the jail construction.
394
WELD COUNTY BUSINESS PARK
Existing Situation:
In 1987 Weld County acquired 160 acres located in the southwest corner of"O"Street and North
11th Avenue in Greeley. Funds for the property came from the sale of the Health Building.
Proposed Solution:
The property is large enough to allow for future consolidation of county facilities in one area. The
utilities and site improvement were developed in 1988 at an estimated cost of$1,750,000 with the
aid of a$630,000 EDA Grant. The first facilities,completed in 1989,included a 15,000 square foot
building for Human Services and a county motor vehicle shop. Fifty to 60 acres have been
developed for building and storage sites and approximately 60 acres can be mined for gravel and
reclaimed in an attractive way. The new correctional facility is located on this site, as well as
Human Services, Health Department, Household Hazardous Waste Building, Training Center,
Motor Pool, Public Works, Law Administration, Buildings and Grounds, Alternative Programs
Facility, and two administrative buildings. A portion of the property was made available for
commercial development and offered at no cost or low cost to private parties for economic
development incentives. A PUD was approved for land use purposes in 1989.
Financing:
Development, using future years'funds, is programmed into the long-range plan under specific
projects,which include a correction facility($17,835,000),and Administrative Facility($5,000,000).
395
GRADER SHEDS / STORAGE BUILDING
Existing Situation:
The county currently has 18 grader sheds throughout Weld County, to accommodate road
maintenance functions in all sectors of the county. The grader sheds are in various conditions,
ranging from good to needing replacement. Seventeen have recently been replaced -- Nunn
(1981),Gwonda(1982),Vim(1983),New Raymer(1984),Mead(1985), Rockport(1986), Kiowa
(1987), Severance(1987), Gilcrest(1989),Ault(1989), Briggsdale(1991), Keenesburg (1994)
Stoneham (1994), Dacono (1995), Fort Lupton (2000), Gill (2001), Galeton (2003), and New
Raymer (2004), and Rockport (2007). In addition, four ice control storage buildings were
constructed in 2001-2003. An additional storage facility at the Public Works Headquarters was
built in 2003. A new Buildings and Grounds facility was built in 2007, and the old facility was
converted to a storage garage for emergency vehicles.
Proposed Solution:
An analysis of existing grader sheds determined which are required for the operational functions
of the road maintenance operation in Weld County. In the process some have been sold,others
consolidated, and some identified for replacement. In cases where existing grader sheds will
accommodate the maintenance function, it is suggested that attention be given to those sheds
that need maintenance or major improvements. Where necessary,replacement sheds have been
identified. Additional storage buildings are needed, as well as office space.
Financing:
The county,since 1982,has totally reconstructed and upgraded all grader and road maintenance
facilities. The county should continue a sound maintenance and replacement program, so the
buildings do not fall into the disrepair condition they were in prior to 1982. The funding mechanism
should be a pay-as-you-go function out of the Capital Fund. Funds in the amount of$750,000 per
year in 2008 - 2010 are included for other Public Works facilities.
396
JUSTICE CENTER
Existing Situation:
The Justice Center includes the Courthouse, Court Annexes, and Centennial Center buildings.
It provides for the space needs of the 19th Judicial District. Under state law the county is obligated
to provide and maintain the facilities for court related activities. The Courthouse was built in 1917
and is maintained on the Federal Register of Historical Buildings. After many remodels and
upgrades it still functions as the main court facility for Weld County. In the mid-1980's two
buildings across the street from the Courthouse were acquired and remodeled to house the
Probation Department. In 2001,the West Courthouse Annex Building was acquired to house the
District Attorney Juvenile Division. As the population grows and court related activities grow the
space requirements continue to expand. Four courtrooms were added in 2007.
Proposed Solution:
With the growing needs of the courts it will require that the county convert the Centennial Center,
including the jail,to courtrooms and court-related offices. With the construction of Phase II of the
North Jail, the Centennial Jail was closed and remodeled into court-related space in 2004. All
Sheriff's office administrative functions,along with Communications and Records,were moved
to the new Public Safety Administrative Building next to the North Jail in 2003. Overtime the entire
Centennial Complex will become court-related space, as well as the two annex buildings to the
west and east of the Courthouse. In 2004, three additional district courtrooms were created, a
juvenile courtroom,and one additional county courtroom,and in 2007 four additional courtrooms
were built. These courtrooms will supplement the current vacant district courtroom and the
visiting judge courtroom to accommodate four anticipated additional judges through 2011. The
first floor of the Centennial Jail has been converted into courtrooms. The second and third floors
of the jail are being remodeled for additional court and office facilities. First floor Centennial offices
were converted into office space for the Clerk to the Court. The space in the Courthouse
occupied by the Clerk to the Court was converted into a district courtroom. Space occupied by
the Weld County Commissioners and administrative functions will be converted to court-related
space after these functions move to a new administrative building sometime after 2010.
Financing:
The county can accommodate court related activities in the space of the Justice Center for
several years. In addition, the block to the southeast of the Centennial Complex has been
acquired by the county and converted into a parking lot. In the future when the need arises,that
block can serve as a site for court building expansion and a parking garage structure to
accommodate court space needs. Also, in the next decade it may be necessary to have court
facilities in the southern part of Weld County where the population is growing at a rapid rate. The
funding mechanism for all court facility needs should be a pay-as-you-go function out of the
Capital Fund. The following page is a schedule of proposed conversion of Justice Center space.
397
CAPITAL PLAN
FOR
JUSTICE CENTER
YEAR CURRENT USE NEW USE COST
2007 Vacant Work Release (30,000 sf) $ 4,275,000
2007 Second Floor Old Jail 2 Courtrooms $ 950,000
2007 Third Floor Work Release 2 Courtrooms $ 950,000
2007 Third Floor Work Release DA Offices $ 100,000
2010 Vacant Administrative Bldg. $ 5,000,000
2011 Planning Probation $ 100,000
2011 Third Floor Centennial 2 Courtrooms $ 1,200,000
2011 First Floor Centennial 1 Courtroom $ 200,000
2013 Vacant DA Building $ 5,000,000
2014+ Third Floor Centennial (DA) 2 Courtrooms $ 750,000
2014+ Second Floor Centennial 2 Courtrooms $ 750,000
2014+ First Floor Centennial (DA) Court Offices $ 200,000
398
ALTERNATIVE PROGRAMS
BUILDING
Existing Situation:
Alternative programs are currently housed in the old jail and in the West Courthouse Annex. As
jail crowding becomes more and more of a problem, the alternative programs, such as work
release and pre-trial programs, are used more and more by the Court. The programs currently
occupy approximately 20,000 square feet. The space that the programs occupy is needed for
courtrooms and Probation office space.
Proposed Solution:
To accommodate the space needs of the alternative programs and allow for growth in the
programs,a 30,000 square foot building is proposed. The facility will be constructed in the Weld
County Business Park. This puts the facility in closer proximity to the jail for support services.
Financing:
The new 30,000 square foot Alternative Programs Building was constructed in 2007.
399
PUBLIC SAFETY
ADMINISTRATION BUILDING
Existing Situation:
Growing needs of the courts require that the county convert the Centennial Center, including the
jail,to courtrooms and court-related offices. With the construction of Phase II of the North Jail,the
Centennial Jail will be closed and remodeled into court-related space. In addition, all Sheriff's
office administrative functions, along with the Communications and Records, was relocated in
2004 to accommodate the courts.
Proposed Solution:
Since the entire jail operation was moved to the North Jail there are logistical advantages to
relocate all Sheriff office functions near the jail site. To accommodate the space needs of the
Sheriffs Office, a 22,000 square foot office building near the North Jail site was constructed in
2002. The building houses the Sheriff's office functions, Communications, and Records. This
allows for the consolidation of all criminal justice functions at one site with the exception of patrol
substations.
Financing:
The new Public Safety Administration Building was constructed in 2002. Funds in the amount of
$2,500,000 were budgeted in 2002 for the construction of a 22,000 square foot office building.
400
DOWNTOWN GREELEY
PARKING AND LAND
Existing Situation:
The Courthouse and Centennial Center are located in the center of downtown Greeley. The future
plans are for these facilities to be the judicial center for the 19th Judicial District that serves Weld
County. Parking has been a long time problem in the area for citizens using the facilities. In
addition,as Weld County looks to the future there will be a need to have land to locate future court
facilities. The court administration is insistent upon having a centralized location, since other
jurisdictions have had logistical problems attempting to split court facilities into more than one
location. As a result, there is a need to acquire land adjacent to the current location to
accommodate future court facilities.
Proposed Solution:
In July, 2003, the county purchased a portion of an adjacent block of property to the Centennial
Complex and Courthouse to allow for surface parking in the immediate future, and to provide
future building sites for future court facilities. Opportunity existed to purchase approximately
100,000 square feet adjacent to the current facilities in 2003. The parking was developed in 2004,
and needed facilities can be constructed on this site in the future.
Financing:
In 2003,fund balance from the General Fund in the amount of$1,500,000 was transferred to the
Capital Expenditure Fund to acquire the site and put money aside for the parking improvements
in 2004. Approximately 250 parking spots have been developed to serve the area. As portions
of the site are needed for court building sites, a parking structure can be built to accommodate
added parking needs or land to the east or south of the site can be acquired for surface parking.
401
ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE BUILDING
Existing Situation:
The long term plan with the development of the Weld County Business Park was for the eventual
move of all administrative functions of the county to the business park. All of the functions were
housed at the Centennial Complex in 1976. In 1990-91 the Assessor, Treasurer, Clerk and
Recorder,and Planning were relocated to the business park. With the future space demands of
the courts it is anticipated that the remaining county administrative functions at the Centennial
Complex will need to be relocated to the Weld County Business Park within the next 10 years.
This will leave the Centennial Complex as a justice and law enforcement center exclusively.
Proposed Solution:
In order to accommodate the court's space needs and the county's administrative functions it will
be necessary to construct a new administrative facility at the Weld County Business Park in the
next 10 years. To accommodate the space needs of the existing administrative functions and plan
for future growth it is anticipated that a building comparable to the new Health Building will be
required.
Financing:
It is recommended that in the Capital Improvement Plan that the county begin to accumulate funds
in a reserve for the future construction of a new administrative building. Estimated costs for the
facility will be$5,000,000. In the ten-year Capital Improvement Plan$5,000,000 is reserved for
2010.
402
SOCIAL SERVICES
BUILDING ANNEX
Existing Situation:
The Social Services Building was acquired in the 1970's and in the mid 1990's an annex was
added. In 2005,additional land was purchased,adjacent to and south of the two existing buildings.
The additional land will accommodate another 40,000 square foot building and parking.
Proposed Solution:
It is proposed that a new 40,000 square foot building be constructed in Greeley on the Social
Services site in 2008. The building will accommodate the current services, plus allow room for
future expansion of services in the area.
Financing:
The building will be constructed in 2008. Funds in the amount of$6,000,000 are budgeted in the
2008 budget for the 40,000 square foot building. Additional parking was constructed in 2007.
403
SOUTHWEST
COUNTY SERVICE CENTER
Existing Situation:
The Southwest County Service Center was developed in 2000 - 2001. With the growth in the
area,additional facilities will be required to house all the County functions required to service the
area.
Proposed Solution:
It is proposed that an additional 20,000 square foot building be constructed on the Southwest Weld
County Service Center site in 2012. The building will accommodate the current services, plus
allow room for future expansion of services in the area.
Financing:
The building will be constructed in 2012. Funds in the amount of$4,000,000 are budgeted in the
2012 budget for the 20,000 square foot building.
404
SOUTHEAST
COUNTY SERVICE CENTER
Existing Situation:
The Southeast County Service Center was acquired as a used building in the early 1980's from
the City of Fort Lupton. With the growth in the area,the building was no longer large enough for
the functions located in the building, and the building was in need of remodeling.
Proposed Solution:
In 2007,a new 23,000 square foot building was constructed in east Fort Lupton on a five-acre site.
The building accommodates the historic services provided,plus Probation and increased Social
Services. The location of the building in east Fort Lupton will better accommodate not only Fort
Lupton residents, but also residents from the Hudson and Lochbuie areas.
Financing:
The building was constructed in 2006 - 2007.
405
MISCELLANEOUS PROJECTS
Existing Situation:
Each year there are several small projects to update or renovate county facilities,provide for new
county programs,and remodel to accommodate changing programs or meet new legal standards.
An approach which provides miscellaneous funds of this nature can prevent postponing
necessary remodeling of facilities and,thus,avoid added cost or delay of potential savings to the
county and taxpayers. In addition, such an approach can also make better utilization of existing
facilities in order to avoid the acquisition of new space and facilities. Carpet replacement should
be included in this category.
Proposed Solution:
It is recommended that an amount of$100,000 per year be set aside for such projects in the Long
Range Capital Projects Plan.
Financing:
It is recommended the county budget $100,000 in each future year.
406
ACCUMULATIVE CAPITAL
OUTLAY/CONTINGENCY
Existing Situation:
If Weld County is to embark upon a number of ventures in capital projects over the next five years,
it is suggested the county proceed very cautiously and very conservatively in the area of financing.
To do this, it is suggested that a contingency be set aside each year on a pay as you go basis to
accommodate unanticipated cost increases or emergency situations which cannot be foreseen
at this time. If the contingency amount is accumulated over the next five years, it can be used as
a reserve for the capital projects program in future years, or it can be used as a funding
mechanism in years beyond 2012. The primary reserve would be for a future correctional facility
or other facilities at the North County Complex and southwest and southeast County
administrative office sites.
Proposed Solution:
Budget any carry-over amount each year on a contingency basis that ultimately could be used to
meet any contingency or emergency situation, or could be used as an accumulation of capital
outlay funds for funding of projects beyond 2012.
Financing:
It is recommended that the county budget fund balance carry-overs in the capital fund each year
as a contingency.
407
MISCELLANEOUS FUNDS
408
AIRPORT
Existing Situation:
The Weld County Board of County Commissioners, with approval of the Airport Master Plan,
committed to participate in certain enhancements at the Airport facility, especially those
enhancements that will ensure the safety of airport operations. If the Board decides to continue
to participate in the joint funding of the Greeley/Weld County Airport Authority with the City of
Greeley,funds should be provided for in the Long Range Capital Projects Plan to accommodate
the FAAADAP program during the next five years. Funds can also be made available to maintain
FAA constructed facilities.
Proposed Solution:
In the Long Range Capital Projects Plan for 2008, funds are included to accommodate capital
improvements at the Greeley/Weld County Airport. If funding is provided,it should be for projects
that emphasize safety features and other essential enhancements to the current operation.
Financing:
Funding, in the amount of$3,947 is required in the Airport's 2008 Capital Improvement Plan.
409
o o 8 8 $! $ "8 8 '8: 8: o
8 8
a a A:' m'. 14: g h P. n A.
n o
8 8 8 8 $. a $' a 8 $''. $' $ i$
co o n
co en
Lei
{in c`i
8 8 8 S $i g; g! 8 g ,g
A
F d
W
W ry
WI
re
as
O 8 8 8 8 8' g$ o $! 8 8; 8
f o0 0 o pp. o c o 2pp5 8 @',. o �i o ¢.. rq.
o N Vi n 8 SG N $ 2: N :a
cc
a A
W
2 U Q
W a CD
w ₹
O
re
a Y
x
N CO
$: a '.$!. ;$q.
a T U o 0 O o .pp a
V _ U -27
V ...: b �C..
W Q d
X to
0 Q
oc
N EL a LZ
Q .2-
r
W
a
E U —
$ v
I', 5 v E h
a 3 L.- c
m g _ a u
v u m 0 ¢ o
C0 2 U`' a `. d
¢h
LL a)
C
ro =
U y m E a m
a d
O-
a a F U m w m m
E v u e. u £ ro II, r o r LL
^' Q E 8 2 N ro .a E r a r-4 a N a a
E c o a 1 a `m E }$� .. E ro av a : �i of o R : 2 E
Z f N m ) ) m Y m >. '}� ro .. Q Y.. Q JGGOJ Q m
a a to m m m m x m '& �p 4 _ c a`
Q Q Q Q 1 li o U H 0 t o F F Iic L R :S' IL 1- C l-:.. R' F Z
•
410
CONSERVATION TRUST FUND
Existing Situation:
With the passage of SB119(The Colorado Lottery),40 percent of the proceeds of the lottery are
earmarked for Conservation Trust Funds in local governments. The earning potential of the lottery
is anticipated to be$385,000 per year. The funds must be used for"the acquisition,development
and maintenance of new conservation sites or for capital improvements or maintenance for
recreational purposes on any public site". (Section 29-21-101, C. R. S.) With the passage of
Amendment 8(GO COLORADO)these funds should stabilize at$385,000 per year,plus lottery
sales growth. See Conservation Trust Fund for detailed discussion.
Proposed Solution:
The Board has the option to use the funds in the following ways:
1. Maintain and improve Island Grove Park.
2. Maintain and improve the Missile Site park.
3. Acquire and maintain open space.
4. Develop and maintain trails.
5. Other project requests from throughout the county.
Financing:
In addition to Conservation Trust Funds, it is recommended that the county finance parks and
recreation projects at a level of$125,000 in the General Fund from property taxes. Funds from
2008 forward are uncommitted.
411
ISLAND GROVE
Existing Situation:
Weld County and the City of Greeley currently have certain joint ventures and commitments to
develop the Island Grove Park facility. Some discussion has been held regarding the creation of
an Island Grove Park Authority for development and management of the facility.
Proposed Solution:
If the Board of County Commissioners decides to continue participation in the development of the
Island Grove facility, it is recommended that Conservation Trust Funds from the lottery be used
to the maximum amount prior to use of county general tax funds.
Financing:
It is recommended that the county finance any Island Grove enhancements with Conservation
Trust Funds resulting from the lottery to the maximum amount possible prior to use of general
county tax funds. Beginning in 2003, $100,000 per year in General Fund dollars has been
committed to the maintenance of an indoor arena facility. Also, in 2000 the County contributed
$1,500,000 towards the construction of the indoor arena facility, known as the Island Grove
Community Building. The facility was constructed and will be maintained jointly by the City of
Greeley, Farm Show,and Weld County. $250,000 was included in the 2004 General Fund budget
to add air conditioning to the Island Grove Community Building. The county paid$1,500,000 in
2006 for the Island Grove Park Master Plan that covers improvements to the park for the next
10 - 20 year period.
412
P OPRIETARY
FUNDS
PROPRIETARY FUNDS SUMMARY
Proprietary funds include both Internal Service Funds and Enterprise Funds. Internal Service Funds
are established to account for goods and services provided to other departments of the county on
a cost-reimbursement basis. Enterprise Funds account for departments providing services
primarily to third party payers.
PARAMEDIC SERVICE ENTERPRISE FUND: The Paramedic Service is funded totally from
2008 projected fees of$7,677,728 with no county subsidy. Total expenditures include$4,142,635
for salaries, $2,156,555 for bad debt allowance,$171,691 for depreciation,and the remainder for
services and supplies. The budget for new equipment is $250,000.
MOTOR VEHICLE FUND: The Motor Vehicle Fund accounts for the revenue and costs generated
by equipment and vehicles rented to other county departments. The gross operating budget
amounts to$6,518,500 in 2008,with$2,470,000 budgeted for new capital equipment. The budget
reflects the continuation of the contract fleet management approach adopted by the Board in August
1984. Depreciation is $2,300,000 for new equipment purchases, plus sale of surplus items of
$288,500.
HEALTH INSURANCE FUND: The Health Insurance Fund reflects the cost of Weld County's
self-insurance program which includes health,dental,and vision coverage. Details of the program
and coverage are found under the specifics of the fund summary. In 2008,the county will continue
with only dental and vision being self-insured. Health coverage will be provided by a private
company on a partially self-insured basis.
INSURANCE FUND: The Insurance Fund accounts for all insurance costs for the county. The
program is a combination of insured risks and protected self-insurance risks. Gross budget costs
are$1,640,000 in 2008,with a property tax levy of$1,500,000. Details of the program are provided
under the specifics of the fund summary.
PHONE SERVICE FUND: Budget reflects total consolidation of phone service costs of$1,579,414
in Weld County. Funding is at current level and reflects capital upgrades of$500,000.
WELD COUNTY FINANCE CORPORATION: Budget contains the funding for the Weld County
Finance Corporation,which accounts for the lease purchases of county buildings. As of August 1,
2007, there are no longer any active leases. Weld County has no long-term debt.
413
PARAMEDIC FUND
SUMMARY OF REVENUES
2008
2007 2008 2008 2008
FUND ORG ACCT ACCOUNT TITLE BUDGET REQUEST RECOMMEND FINAL
INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE
5000 23100 4340 GRANT 0 77,120 77,120 0
CHARGE FOR SERVICES
5000 23100 4410 CHARGE FOR SERVICES 14,242,187 14,466,014 14,466,014 0
5000 23100 44101 MEDICARE/MEDICAID ADJUSTMENT (6,600,000) (6,883,800) (6,883,800) 0
TOTAL CHARGE FOR SERVICES 7,642,187 7,582,214 7,582,214 0
MISCELLANEOUS
5000 23100 4730 FEES 0 8,606 8,606 0
5000 23100 4820 COMPENSATION FOR LOSSES 0 9,788 9,788 0
TOTAL MISCELLANEOUS 0 18,394 18,394 0
TOTAL PARAMEDIC SERVICES FUND 7.642.187 7.677.728 7.677.728 0
414
PARAMEDIC FUND
SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES
2007
2007 2008 2008 2008
FUND ORG EXPENDITURE FUNCTION BUDGET REQUEST RECOMMEND FINAL
5000 23100 AMBULANCE 7,642,187 7,677,728 7,677,728 0
TOTAL PARAMEDIC FUND 7,642,187 7,677,728 7,677,728 0
415
BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY
AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: PARAMEDIC SERVICE ENTERPRISE FUND
BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Paramedic Service -- 5000-23100
DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: The Weld County Paramedic Service responds to both routine
and emergency calls for the county. It is an advanced life support(paramedic)provider. Personnel
and vehicles are stationed in Greeley, Evans, and Fort Lupton.
ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED RECOMMEND
RESOURCES LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY
Personnel Services $ 3,288,900 $ 3,856,782 $ 4,142,635 $ 4,142,635
Supplies 250,000 179,690 294,380 294,380
Purchased Services 454,748 529,855 531,107 531,107
Fixed Charges 2,137,000 2,800,860 2,459,606 2,459,606
Capital 164,000 275,000 250,000 250,000
Gross County Cost $ 6,294,648 $ 7,642,187 $ 7,677,728 $ 7,677,728
Revenue 6,294,648 7,642,187 7,677,728 7,677,728
Net County Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0
Budget Positions 44 50 51 51
SUMMARY OF CHANGES: It is proposed to increase FTE's by one Paramedic Services
Coordinator($47,577).
The budget request includes the re-chassis of one Braun ambulance($80,000)and the purchase
of one Braun ambulance($140,000). This is consistent with scheduled replacement of ambulances
via re-chassis and fifty percent(50%)of this cost is paid for by a State EMS Provider Grant. The
purchase of the other new vehicle is an altering of the rotation due to excessive maintenance cost
exceeding$1.00 per mile;more than double the cost of other vehicles. Miles driven by the fleet are
rapidly approaching 400,000 miles per year. An Assistance to Firefighter's Grant(AFG) is being
completed and will be presented for the Board's approval to fund the addition of a command vehicle
to the department fleet. Currently, an ambulance must be utilized for incident command for
on-going scene of calls and standbys. With increasing call load and only eleven ambulances in the
fleet this is an outdated and inefficient use of resources. The ambulances must be kept available
for patient transports.
416
PARAMEDIC SERVICE
(CONTINUED)
5000-23100
SUMMARY OF CHANGES (CONTINUED):
The purchase of one additional computer workstation for Evans Station#2 is requested. There is
currently only one field workstation available at this location. Funding of$16,000.00 is budgeted to
support the contracting of two employees,per calendar year,to attend Paramedic Training Centers/
Programs in Denver. There continues to be a shortage of qualified applicants to fill personnel
openings that occur throughout the year. Internal candidates have proven to be the best long term
solution. This creates one open position that will continue to be covered by pad-time staff when
applicants are attending training.
OBJECTIVES: 1)To keep the Ambulance Service on a self-supporting (zero subsidy)basis; 2)
To maintain maximum possible collection ratios; and 3) To develop stable revenue sources.
PERFORMANCE MEASURES
ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED
Work Outputs
Total Calls For Service 12,298 13,282 14,079
# Patients Evaluated/Treat/Air Transport 800 900 950
#Transported Patients 8,210 8,866 9,397
Total Transport Mileage 66,754 72,094 73,045
# Dry Runs: No Patient/ Cancelled 2,586/516 2,792/860 3,069/911
Efficiency Measures
FTE's per 10,000/capita 2.00 2.20 2.26
Per capita cost (county support) $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Receipts/Charges Ratio w/contractual 30% 30% 30%
Receipts/Charges Ratio w/o contractual 64% 62% 62%
Effectiveness Measures (desired results)
Fractile Emergency Response Times (<9
minutes 90% of calls) -Weld County 73% 70% 70%
Fractile Routine Response Times (<15
minutes 90% of calls) - Weld County 91% 91% 90%
417
PARAMEDIC SERVICE
(CONTINUED)
5000-23100
FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: The additional position of Paramedic
Service Programs Coordinator($47,577)will take over duties of the shift supervisors that coordinate
the fleet maintenance,medical supplies and maintenance,controlled drugs program,and facilities
maintenance. Due to the growing volume of calls, the shift supervisors no longer have adequate
time to perform these duties that are divided between them. The position does add overhead to the
service; however, it is recommended due to the growing volume of calls and the workload the shift
supervisors have to deal with operationally. Policy issue.
The fleet changes are consistent with the replacement program and recommended. The increases
in service and supplies are justified based upon growth in volume and inflationary trends.
Revenues are based upon a 6% increase in calls and a 4.3% rate increase. The rate increase is
the smallest in over 10 years and is necessary to continue to keep the service financially sound.
Recommend approval.
BOARD ACTION:
418
MOTOR POOL FUND
SUMMARY OF REVENUES
2008
2007 2008 2008 2008
FUND ORG ACCT ACCOUNT TITLE BUDGET REQUEST RECOMMEND FINAL
CHARGE FOR SERVICES
6000 96300 4410 CHARGE FOR SERVICES 4,107,475 4,000,000 4,000,000 0
MISCELLANEOUS
6000 96300 4680 OTHER 2,256,000 2,300,000 2,300,000 0
6000 96300 4810 GAIN LOSS ON SALE 323,800 288,500 288,500 0
6000 96300 4820 COMPENSATION FOR LOSSES 0 100,000 100,000 0
TOTAL MISCELLANEOUS 2,579,800 2,688,500 2,688,500 0
TOTAL MOTOR POOL FUND 6.687,275 6,688,500 6,688.500 0
419
MOTOR POOL FUND
SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES
2007
2007 2008 2008 2008
FUND ORG EXPENDITURE FUNCTION BUDGET REQUEST RECOMMEND FINAL
6000 17550 VEHICLE REPLACEMENT 2,131,200 2,470,000 2,470,000 0
6000 96300 COUNTY SHOP 6,363,475 6,518,500 6,518,500 0
TOTAL MOTOR POOL FUND 8,494,675 8,988,500 8,988,500 0
420
BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY
AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: IS - MOTOR POOL
BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Motor Pool Administration - - 6000-96300
DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: Centralized motor pool support for Weld County. Contract for
fleet maintenance is included in this budget unit.
ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED RECOMMEND
RESOURCES LAST FY CURRENT NEXT FY NEXT FY
FY
Personnel Services $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0
Supplies 1,992,587 2,051,000 2,032,000 2,032,000
Purchased Services 1,961,505 1,981,500 2,042,500 2,042,500
Fixed Charges 2,419,476 2,330,975 2,420,000 2,420,000
Capital 0 0 24,000 24,000
Gross County Cost $ 6,373,568 $ 6,363,475 $ 6,518,500 $ 6,518,500
Revenue 8,297,299 6,687,275 6,688,500 6,688,500
Net County Cost $ -1,923,731 $ -323,800 $ -170,000 $ -170,000
Budget Positions - - - - - - - -
SUMMARY OF CHANGES: Supplies are down $19,000 primarily in small equipment needs.
Contract services are up$50,000 due to growth and inflation, utilities are up$10,000,and phones
are up$1,000. Anticipated loss on sale of assets is up$35,000,and overhead is up$10,025. Shop
equipment is budgeted at $24,000.
OBJECTIVES: Provide most efficient and economical means of vehicle maintenance for the
county departments through privatization.
421
IS -MOTOR POOL ADMINISTRATION
(CONTINUED)
6000-96300
PERFORMANCE MEASURES
ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED
Work Outputs
Number of work orders issued 6,900 7,000 7,100
Number of service/maintenance orders
per technician 862 875 895
Efficiency Measures
FTE's per 10,000/capita .50 .49 .48
Work orders issued per FTE 612 615 623
Effectiveness Measures (desired results)
#of mechanics to vehicle/equipment ratio 1:105 1:105 1:105
FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval.
BOARD ACTION:
422
BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY
AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: IS - MOTOR POOL
BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Motor Pool Equipment -- 6000-17550
DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: Use of funded depreciation to acquire vehicles for county use.
ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED RECOMMEND
RESOURCES LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY
Personnel Services $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0
Capital 3,274,006 2,131,200 2,593,000 2,470,000
Gross County Cost $ 3,274,006 $ 2,131,200 $ 2,593,000 $ 2,470,000
Revenue 0 0 0 0
Net County Cost $ 3,274,006 $ 2,131,200 $ 2,593,000 $ 2,470,000
Budget Positions - - - - - - - -
SUMMARY OF CHANGES: See listed equipment on next page.
OBJECTIVES: N/A
FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval.
BOARD ACTION:
423
IGA EQUIPMENT
Request Recommend Approved
Sheriff:
Patrol Vehicles (9) $ 216,000 $ 216,000
Cargo Van (1) 35,000 35,000
SUV (2) 60,000 60,000
Animal Control:
4 X 4 Extend Cab (1) 18,000 18,000
OEM:
4 X 4 Crew Cab (1) 28,000 0
Buildings and Grounds:
4 X 4, 3/4 ton (1) 20,000 20,000
Building Inspection:
4 X 4 SUV (1) 23,000 0
4 X 4 Extend Cab (2) 48,000 0
Planning:
4 X 4 Extend Cab (1) 24,000 0
Coroner:
1/2 Ton Pickup (1) 22,000 22,000
Noxious Weed:
2.5 Ton Spray Truck (1) 85,000 85,000
Public Works:
See Basic List 2,014,000 2.014.000 _
Total $2,593,000 $2,470.000
424
^5 ti L t .3,f t ¢ "f hi gi dst�, =f rt .44
�} T 4
0,44:1410
' {f f4IT it *
4' y. 4. ,.
gfI i f1tEti
Ikkikli r k r it iii ^t i AA At 5 a
E 444 4 Iii_ ;IN; i' ii LJ{+�5 , iqi° 4 i' ip4 i.
i a i F 4=i i a ti' �!rApi 1 Sig br i 40
i'a&r � i,< �i r� »( � r m Iiphg �I$ {'�` �� +.,E-a I� rr.4 d�ai
• tip
ifi OiR O lit O l Okt�'Oti p 8 i 0 't Ql, I0thdill jt O44 ` c.R0041.4 O
Qt § �,� o iFi §! QF n t1 O., o��iao it O ,Q ired�o
A.;
O kt(c:,14.14
ii O F3I Li,1,,k O. 0 5 11 Q �"i O iF�5 O o et O 1".O s 6 i H� t+)
i O i O pU r } tQ
N d �
� O, (7 Q ,t Q .I lA7 t. 0J iL l
Alt:ea i t 1k �{Np{ �N �" � t�}r V d +`V y�yt V�'� M d N 3{{9gp
Y } �,f.,yv 1 ''� �G �i .i ���67, i t t N 44.O rt ii 1� §4,�. Its �i „A, °+,s l tun -4i,, rA Pi �4 1.4 ai'
va
tkk �{ i t + L 9 It', d b
U74 ';',,1'.41144I
tt Li i iL iii `4di '�j n� Lh+i ri'i{
9 r} s alit,F �
Fa' a �e i. tt7� )Ito At 4 ls' 1144I Iii a�pI i t d alit,
s 4; N� �
O. /* aye € d '§,ai i ,L 0,,,, E �i I ,A A, r „+e
k44!ki
Z t �q �' „ d�„g i4 � .o�r ty„�. "kkk t i, W a
�i1 xa�z i+,y'r i.i O 4 Vti IM 3 ' 3Z i"' y` ¢.II�IY
441
U a .'Eder i t ,;I F y�.fi t, 3 i- lit v ' .11 'Siw i i.
i : io d No iii! s'`�� >4183.1r*
. o 41i 4044 33
Jit. it. ti ; ',,,AN , 'L iii, -8,A,
i m s i', °ni r'#' .
Wr Iii i N ;frPo v�` i 1 i m r U its did d 4444,
f" 'e." c�s Ti i o,co i ' m!' N�.T"' O₹ # N s I. k i, it {:
W i N >b s' 01 O 4 t vii '' (pt L .I�'yP rkYi� :a E.
1 ip Nr li c]..„,..,-(7),,.
` .,t it Apr, ; fa i.i
a x� n it 04ai � ° � lei '' i U ibd .
7 vk �� -it'v1 TE+ �I, t Y ' rnd t�
C3 I N i • 0 P> o , X i, 6 lig C] Sri t 'U w144;
44 apt, it a ' 0 Ivl i 2 cc Y 'i
ot5 a3i ; U �`m 1aLiot
a '''u� 2r fxL m a s x J s 0 U i, W b J b a1+ O
crew �if_O ccIfi O4,OO44
f k Oi a r
: '''`�jJJggggp[p[y, t :Y Y 'O �b i°,[L xE
p , iH P U`?,02i LWr" �fl d �' a D- J h Y LM& U G* Q #
4,4 N o it
a I m
E c H r E
'4,1:141° YimpE Or EO ' ` C9i m. . n 'ra�t m
U LcI a o F- t- 1 o o f �'� � r a'f a� t" c ng O Ii
N r N i A 'O F— t ♦— O: o N Chi
Viii . Ii I1 i;m 1—iii�4,'." ;:,.� ,ua !n sir rzrm co U F" ri Y
ri
litIESIK
r
el
N
Tel
Ui C E
d
Y a O) IT
V
` ` - J
at' F— C7 m ✓A
425
X
ljf 3 ti 1,.1", 1 . §' k L'u �:( i ,f`j
. , .:1 a 'teat a O }7" a pi
,'11,114 144. ! 3w Ali i a " 6 is
uli 11i Nt l ��Par +
H sa .01i J1A
'c ! '�s S, 0 is f o, A'{xs! O
O o yS,,, o h o t, oh'1 O!k, O 9..,-bi 9 ^'U
u a o „= ,, o o �I ' Ort 0 . roh_„ o ! o N�
O! 0 0; 1, o-a Ri tD IN L7 it ..r V h CO 11 n 4.4 i
v• • 1 UJtsr a; M!`iQ v i CO p
at 1,21 » »1 Z4 f»'}d iet sr i trait coR
34,t4 ii.',..,,,,.'7144n, Lr, hi ` t y i t AV tors, r'
41 r1 # , v ` I' Er t h�i
p i II
t i•,,s.'-'11
.,a k k !
pri
aN
,. i9 " 'w'e i- a z? I+ E +4*t 4', 1 f
a yy t E !r, re a } i
jlittil,?; N;1! AD II t t �ri, ,-1 9' :Jim '�Yre: L 'Y{�3M3`
al
iiireil zi I !k�Y Sk m�I I l I Q y i. At..: �:o ,
t ,j �. G I .
I4 N [9] !! hit' .«, - 0,-;',.. �j� 4 ' v =fi m tug,, r in,Ii. NA m x, '0 s,, I a)611' N 'i y t' Ot tt a^v.).24.4.... Nti QS yh.. I JE J
m ! $',e Frio
o !o , t I
L h5. 'i & .4::i, X J
ian
c 31i ii L V L "0 N;, e I
a c a m � a' U
friSSIr ..- 0 ., m U as m " a
31� m 'EI U" aU m,
a> t U I
4 d h O i µ �} a U .. f—�i Uti: I y�,
LL !--e _ C dCOI O
C =a •- a2 4 O C ". E!''
O � U' N s W r � , I;!" F� � l p i V' - co(N I V
",. .-
', z•At ohti
... ,,,
Y V
1, a
., Ui C c
ri 0)
c c .. I-
S
426
f O
O
n'il;;;;01-
escr
H
(OHist
cc -,rhruiti,
O I O ' O
O O
O_
7 4t a; coo ' co
LL
W'
Z`Ca Lii
U m
Q Lt.
g 'O
Et 2 i
F F 3
Z: >.
W sA,C, N
2k
O
W U
W � 'r•e
fn
O °b' m
Nco L• ieTW '-
ea• my he.er
N O
tn
++ C 0)
^ d 77-
a
c I--
a0l
C a
�+ W Cl)
427
HEALTH INSURANCE FUND
SUMMARY OF REVENUES
2008
2007 2008 2008 2008
FUND ORG ACCT ACCOUNT TITLE BUDGET REQUEST RECOMMEND FINAL
MISCELLANEOUS
6200 93400 46902 EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTIONS 8,701,008 8,701,008 8,701,008 0
TOTAL HEALTH INSURANCE FUND 8.701.008 8,701.008 8,701.008 0
428
HEALTH INSURANCE FUND
SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES
2007
2007 2008 2008 2008
FUND ORG EXPENDITURE FUNCTION BUDGET REQUEST RECOMMEND FINAL
6200 93400 DENTALNISION 8,701,008 8,701,008 8,701,008 0
TOTAL HEALTH INSURANCE FUND 8,701,008 8.701.008 8,701,008 0
429
BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY
AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: IS - HEALTH INSURANCE
BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Health Insurance Fund -- 6200-93100/93400
DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: Provides for the costs associated with Weld County's self-
insured health program.
ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED RECOMMEN
RESOURCES LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY D
NEXT FY
Personnel Services $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0
Purchased Services 17,552 27,000 27,000 27,000
Fixed Charges 7,213,696 8,674,008 8,674,008 8,674,008
Gross County Cost $ 7,231,248 $ 8,701,008 $ 8,701,008 $ 8,701,008
Revenue 7,423,303 8,701,008 8,701,008 8,701,008
Net County Cost $ -192,055 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0
SUMMARY OF CHANGES: The budget reflects the cost of self-insuring the dental and vision
reimbursement plan($285,924),Employee Assistance Program($22,000),and wellness program
($5,000). In addition the budget,in 2005,started to include the self-insured health program offered
county employees through Great West Healthcare.
OBJECTIVES: 1)Provide employee health/dental/vision insurance in the most cost effective way
possible; and 2) Provide a well program to all employees.
PERFORMANCE MEASURES
ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED
Work Outputs
Single coverage 549 521 525
Family coverage 321 285 285
FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. Budget anticipates
a 15%county contribution increase,which is slightly higher than the cost increase of medical care.
Weld County will utilize Great-West Healthcare, with a hybrid PPO/HMO plan as the health
insurance provider in 2008. Dependent coverage contribution has been set at 75%of the employee
rate.
430
IS - HEALTH INSURANCE
6200-93100
(CONTINUED)
FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION(Continued): In 2005, the county moved
its health insurance plan to a consumer driven plan that combines a high deductible PPO insurance
policy along with an HMO component for preventative care, with a $20 co-pay and low cost
prescriptive drug program. The high deductible policy protects the insured from catastrophic
losses, such as prolonged illness, hospitalization or simply an unexpected period of poor health.
The plan is a partially self-insured program with stop loss insurance. The goal is to make the
employees aware of the true cost of health care,with a program that will encourage employees and
their families to make more judicious spending decisions in return for paying lower insurance
premiums and lower health care costs. The health plan is being offered through Great-West
Healthcare.
The county will benchmark the county's contribution to a mid-range PPO plan. In future years,the
county contribution will increase with the cost-of-living increase for health care,and not be based
upon a combination of cost-of-living of healthcare and utilization,since utilization will be controlled
by each individual and their family. Forthe proposed budget,the fund is budgeted at the same
rate as the current year. In the final 2008 budget,the actual rate will have been established
and the new rate will be used. The 2008 program is calculated with current participation as
follows:
Single Coverage: 810
Dependent Coverage: 285
FIXED COSTS:
Health Insurance $1,018,780
Administration/Wellness/EAPCosts = 27,000
Fixed Costs: $1,045,780
LOSS FUND:
Medical $7,369,304
Dental = 193,464
Vision = 92,460
Loss Fund Costs $7,655,228
GRAND TOTAL - COSTS $8,701,008
REVENUE:
Medical $8,388,084
DentalNision 312,924
TOTAL REVENUE $8,701,008
BOARD ACTION:
431
INSURANCE FUND
SUMMARY OF REVENUES
2008
2007 2008 2008 2008
FUND ORG ACCT ACCOUNT TITLE BUDGET REQUEST RECOMMEND FINAL
TAXES
6300 93300 4112 CURRENT PROPERTY TAXES 1,250,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 0
CHARGE FOR SERVICES
6300 93200 4410 CHARGE FOR SERVICES 250,000 250,000 250,000 0
MISCELLANEOUS
6300 93300 4610 EARNINGS ON INVESTMENTS 30,000 30,000 30,000 0
6300 93300 4820 COMPENSATION FOR LOSSES 50,000 40,000 40,000 0
TOTAL MISCELLANEOUS 80,000 70,000 70,000 0
TOTAL INSURANCE FUND 1.580.000 1.820.000 1,820.000 0
432
INSURANCE FUND
SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES
2007
2007 2008 2008 2008
FUND ORG EXPENDITURE FUNCTION BUDGET REQUEST RECOMMEND FINAL
6300 93200 WORKERS COMPENSATION 1,112,300 1,122,300 1,122,300 0
6300 93300 LIABILITY 467,700 517,700 517,700 0
TOTAL INSURANCE FUND 1,580,000 1,640,000 1.640.000 0
433
BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY
AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: IS - INSURANCE
BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Insurance Fund -- 6300-93200/93300
DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: Central fund to provide county-wide insurance coverage.
Administered by Finance and Administration unit in the General Fund.
ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED RECOMMEND
RESOURCES LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY
Personnel Services $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0
Supplies 1,695 500 500 500
Purchased Services 17,242 31,700 31,700 31,700
Fixed Charges 1,065,052 1,547,800 1,607,800 1,607,800
Capital 0 0 0 0
Gross County Cost $ 1,083,989 $ 1,580,000 $ 1,640,000 $ 1,640,000
Revenue/Fund Bal. 85,804 330,000 140,000 140,000
Net County Cost $ 998,185 $ 1,250,000 $ 1,500,000 $ 1,500,000
Budget Positions - - - - - - - -
SUMMARY OF CHANGES: The budget is structured with Weld County remaining a member of
CAPP, but using the self-insured option under the insurance pool for a fixed cost of $332,200.
Effective January 1, 1992,Weld County became self-insured for workers compensation. Workers
Compensation includes excess insurance and bonds costing$230,000,claims administration costs
of $25,000, and a loss fund of $867,300. A loss fund for all other coverages is budgeted at
$185,000. Unemployment insurance is being charged directly to departments.
The program is supported by property tax($1,500,000), charges for service($250,000), interest
($30,000),and compensation for losses($40,000). No fund balance reserves are anticipated to be
needed to support the loss fund in 2008.
OBJECTIVES: Provide county-wide insurance coverage in most cost effective manner possible.
434
INSURANCE FUND
(CONTINUED)
6300-93300
PERFORMANCE MEASURES
ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED
Work Outputs
Number of training sessions 36 36 36
Number of workers compensation claims 110 110 110
Dollar amount of prop/casualty claims paid $140,081 $185,000 $185,000
Efficiency Measures
FTE'S per 10,000/capita 0.045 0.044 0.043
Per capita cost (county support) $4.54 $5.51 $6.42
Cost per claim processed $181.82 $227.27 $220.00
Effectiveness Measures (desired results)
Number of employees trained 525 525 550
Average loss per workers comp claim $4,582 $7,884 $7,885
Percent increase/decrease in number of
claims -4% 3% 0%
FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval of the insurance
program as outlined above in the summary of changes. In accordance with Section 8-44-204,
C.R.S., it is recommended that a mill levy be used to fund the insurance program for local county
activities and a charge back mechanism be used only for programs funded by state and federal
funding sources. Weld County,through CAPP,has reduced limits of coverage and placed reliance
on sovereign immunity to stay within the budgeted amount. The legislative changes in 1986
strengthened the county's position in the use of sovereign immunity limits in Colorado cases. In
addition, the county can levy up to 10 mills per year to discharge any judgment against it.
Continuation of the self-insured program for workers compensation is recommended,which should
result in cost savings, plus no shared risks with other counties. Unemployment costs are
recommended to be charged directly to departments for revenue raising strategies and
departmental accountability for costs.
BOARD ACTION:
435
PHONE SERVICES FUNS
SUMMARY OF REVENUES
2008
2007 2008 2008 2008
FUND ORG ACCT ACCOUNT TITLE BUDGET REQUEST RECOMMEND FINAL
CHARGE FOR SERVICES
6400 17400 4410 CHARGE FOR SERVICES 956,579 1,079,414 1,079,414 0
TOTAL PHONE SERVICES FUND 956.679 1.079.414 1.079.414 0
436
PHONE SERVICES FUND
SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES
2007
2007 2008 2008 2008
FUND ORG EXPENDITURE FUNCTION BUDGET REQUEST RECOMMEND FINAL
6400 17400 PHONE SERVICES 1,206,579 1,579,414 1,579,414 0
TOTAL PHONE SERVICES FUND 1,206,579 1,579,414 1,579,414 0
437
BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY
AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: GENERAL SERVICES AGENCY
BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: PBX Phone Services -- 6400-17400
DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: Provide phone services to Weld County and the Court system.
ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED RECOMMEND
RESOURCES LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY
Personnel Services $ 130,219 $ 133,990 $ 156,854 $ 156,854
Supplies 50,111 14,500 14,500 14,500
Purchased Services 655,968 652,560 701,057 701,057
Fixed Charges 309,328 155,529 207,003 207,003
Capital 108,650 250,000 500,000 500,000
Gross County Cost $ 1,254,276 $ 1,206,579 $ 1,579,414 $ 1,579,414
Revenue 1,054,768 956,579 1,079,414 1,079,414
Net County Cost $ 199,508 $ 250,000 $ 500,000 $ 500,000
Budget Positions 2 2 2 2
SUMMARY OF CHANGES: Salary budget includes cost-of-living adjustments, plus the upgrade
of a position due to salary survey data. Phone lines and maintenance costs are up $48,497 with
growth and inflation. Depreciation is up$41,150 in anticipation of the capital outlay for new phone
systems upgrades in 2008. Overhead is up$9,324. Capital is set at$500,000 in order to replace
the Centennial phone system,upgrade Southwest Weld Administration, upgrade Social Services
system network, and install a new voicemail system. The systems recommended for
improvements all have dated technology and are 15+ year old in some cases. Capital reserves
from depreciation are available to pay for the capital items. Revenue is up$122,835. Recommend
approval.
OBJECTIVES: To operate and maintain all county phone systems, including research for
replacement, improved productivity, and other service requests.
438
PBX PHONE SERVICES
(CONTINUED)
6400-17400
PERFORMANCE MEASURES
ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED
Work Outputs
Incoming calls 5,750,000 5,800,000 6,100,000
Efficiency Measures
FTE's per 10,000/capita 0.091 0.088 0.086
Per capita cost (county support) $5.70 $4.22 $6.77
Annual cost per call $0.18 $0.17 $0.18
Effectiveness Measures (desired results)
Process requests for service within 7 days 100% 100% 100%
FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. Capital upgrades
are needed due to some equipment not being able to be covered by maintenance agreements
because of its age. Plus, the upgrade will take advantage of the new phone technologies.
BOARD ACTION:
439
FINANCE CORPORATION FUND
SUMMARY OF REVENUES
2008
2007 2008 2008 2008
FUND ORG ACCT ACCOUNT TITLE BUDGET REQUEST RECOMMEND FINAL
MISCELLANEOUS
6500 17700 4624 RENTS FROM BUILDINGS 741,293 0 0 0
TOTAL FINANCE CORPORATION FUND 741.293 0 0 0
440
FINANCE CORPORATION FUND
SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES
2007
2007 2008 2008 2008
FUND ORG EXPENDITURE FUNCTION BUDGET REQUEST RECOMMEND FINAL
6500 17700 FINANCE CORPORATION 741,293 0 0 0
TOTAL FINANCE CORPORTATIN FUND 741,293 0 0 0
441
BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY
AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: WELD COUNTY FINANCE AUTHORITY
BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Weld County Finance Authority -- 6500-17700
DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: Provides funds to cover the lease/purchase of county buildings.
ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED RECOMMEND
RESOURCES LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY
Personnel Services $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0
Supplies 0 0 0 0
Purchased Services 0 0 0 0
Fixed Charges 563,185 741,293 0 0
Capital 0 0 0 0
Gross County Cost $ 563,185 $ 741,293 $ 0 $ 0
Revenue 743,866 741,293 0 0
Net County Cost $ -180,681 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0
Budget Positions - - - - - - - -
SUMMARY OF CHANGES: Budget reflects the county's debt service on any long-term debt
and/or any lease purchase debt in any given year. With the payoff of the correctional facilities'
Certificates of Participation (COP)as of August 1, 2007, Weld County has no long-term debt or
long-term lease obligations.
OBJECTIVES: n/a
FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval.
BOARD ACTION:
442
Hello