The URL can be used to link to this page

Browse Search

Home My WebLink About20071658.tiff RESOLUTION RE: ACCEPT RECOMMENDATIONS OF ALIGNMENT OPTIONS FROM COUNTY ROAD 27 (TWO RIVERS PARKWAY)ALTERNATIVE ALIGNMENT STUDY TO BE USED BY WELD COUNTY FOR FUTURE TRANSPORTATION PLANNING WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, pursuant to Colorado statute and the Weld County Home Rule Charter, is vested with the authority of administering the affairs of Weld County, Colorado, and WHEREAS,transportation plans along County Road ("CR")27(the"Two Rivers Parkway") have consistently identified a need for planning alignments to allow for optimum movement of traffic along said roadway, and WHEREAS, previously, the Board of County Commissioners commissioned a study to determine various alternative alignments for said roadway, and WHEREAS,the"Weld County Road 27(Two Rivers Parkway)Alternative Alignment Study," dated February, 2007, identifies and recommends two options for the optimal alignment of said roadway, those being Option 3 for the north end of said roadway and Option 1 for the south end, and WHEREAS,accepting these recommendations now will allow Weld County and/or affected municipalities to preserve needed rights-of-way for the recommended arterials so as to allow construction when the optimal alignments are needed, and allows for implementation in an orderly fashion with the goal of minimizing impacts to adjacent properties in the future. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, that, as shown and recommended in the "Weld County Road 27 (Two Rivers Parkway)Alternative Alignment Study," dated February, 2007, Option 3 for the north end of said roadway and Option 1 for the south end be, and hereby are, accepted to be used by Weld County for future transportation planning for the alignments of said roadway. 2007-1658 EG0056 ACCEPT RECOMMENDATIONS OF ALIGNMENT OPTIONS FROM WELD COUNTY ROAD 27 (TWO RIVERS PARKWAY) ALTERNATIVE ALIGNMENT STUDY PAGE 2 The above and foregoing Resolution was,on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the 11th day of June, A.D., 2007. .� BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS j EL ' EL OUNTY, COLORADO ATTEST: gal/ � • D /id E. Long, Chair Weld County Clerk to the B -r./� Vi-n5 d r 2th Ian � .F�'' Nj°L��!illiam H. rke Pr(Te BY:) + ity Cle to the Boa@ Willia F. Garcia APP AST A _ D� Robert D. Masden my A for ey Q2 _mgke - uglaslRademacher Date of signature: (O`dD7 2007-1658 EG0056 tre...\\1141114r .... Ail- — - . 'Ilk • . ■ • . _ • . COLORADO 392 . . - . • Weld County Road 27 . • . [Two Rivers Parkway) • • Alternative Aliment • • -- St udy 34 • - - - . -r t - 34 • . , . , ;• - = Final Report • �o February 2007 ta . . le•. ..... . I r •• _ .. P° . j .• Weld county Pa Works 1111 N St, Greeley, CO 8.32 2007-1658 — Table of Contents 1. Introductions — Background Page 1 Purpose of the Study Page 1 Public Process Page 1 — 2. Existing Conditions Page 2 3. Identification of Alternatives Page 2 4. Future Construction and ROW Schedule Page 2 5. Generation of Alternatives — Figure 1 - South Segment (SH 60) Page 4 Figure 2 - North Segment (SH 392) Page 5 Table 1 - Evaluation Criteria Definitions Page 6-7 Table 2 — South Segment Evaluation Matrix Page 8-9 Table 3 — North Segment Evaluation Matrix Page 10-11 — South Segment Options/Preferred Option Page 12 North Segment Options/Preferred Option Page 13-14 6. Recommendations — Alignments Page 14 Implementation Process Page 14 Figure 3 — South Segment Recommended Alignment Page 15 Figure 4 — North Segment Recommended Alignment Page 16 Typical Sections Page 17 TWO RIVERS PARKWAY wink, Alternative Aliunment Study OOLORADO Weld County Public Works Department INTRODUCTION Background Long range planning is necessary to provide a safe and efficient network of roadways in Weld County. The backbone of this network is a strategic system of seven arterial roadways. One of these roadways is WCR 27 (Two Rivers Parkway) from State Highway 60 north to State Highway 14. The Weld County Public Works Department is addressing concerns at several locations along Two Rivers Parkway that have disjointed intersections or poor geometry. Purpose of the Study The purpose of this study is to establish preferred alignment options for Two Rivers Parkway. The roadway has been divided into a north and south segment for analysis purposes. The North Segment includes the roadway from WCR 64.5 to SH 392 and the South Segment includes the roadway from SH 60 to WCR 378. Several alignments were proposed and were illustrated at public meetings and are currently available for review on the Weld County website. Public Process The study process began in 2003 with the collection of traffic accident records, traffic daily volumes, and information from other local and state agencies. Existing and future land uses were reviewed, sometimes in the field with local landowners. This information, along with land geometrics, parcel ownerships and other pertinent data, was utilized to develop the alternative alignments. Two public open house meetings were held during the initial stages of review, one for the South Segment near SH 60 on March 18, 2004 and the other for the North Segment near SH 392 on March 24, 2004. Approximately 19 residents attended the South Segment meeting and 23 residents attended the North Segment meeting. A combined final public open house was held on April 11, 2006 to review the selected preferred alignments for both segments of Two Rivers Parkway in which 25 residents attended. In order to ensure maximum public involvement for all open house meetings, invitations were sent to all of the property owners within the study area as well as posting notices on the County website. Over 300 invitations were mailed as part of the three open house meetings. 1 - a \ TWO RIVERS PARKWAY _ wokAlternative Alignment Study COLORADO Weld County Public Works Department 4. EXISTING CONDITIONS Information was gathered concerning the existing conditions for each study area. This included meetings in the field with individual landowners to consider potential impacts and looking at issues not visible from GIS mapping. Other sources of data included information gathered from the Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT) and local town or city near the study areas. 1DEN17FIC "'ION OF AL, E RNA TIVFS Design Parameters Design parameters were established that identified general guidelines to be used for the alternative alignments. They include the following: Classification as a major arterial Right of Way width is 140 ft The posted speed limit is 55 mph with the design speed 60 mph Construction of the new arterials may be dependant on new development and require that portions (interim condition) of the ultimate section be built initially with the entire roadway to be completed when traffic demands increase Major structures, such as bridges, may be built full width as it is difficult to widen in the future `i. f z_4 ct.JF F_ CONsTRi . CTICN ANC MG?";OF ' )in JC H 13o; .., At the time of this publication, no specific schedule for construction or purchasing of the right of way for these two segments of Two Rivers Parkway is known. The construction schedule will be highly dependant on the growth patterns in the area. This study will be used as the basis for planning the corridor area and preserving the rights of way as development occurs. Furthermore, as development occurs, it is anticipated that development adjacent to the arterial will be responsible for the roadway improvements as a means to mitigate their traffic impacts. The County or local agencies within the study corridor will ultimately be responsible for those portions not funded by developments. Construction costs are estimated at $3,000,000 per mile for new four lane road construction and new bridge costs are estimated at $100/sq.ft. 2 6t \ TWO RIVERS PARKWAY _ inkAlternative Alignment Study COIARADO Weld County Public Works Department 5. GENERATION OF ALTERNATIVE Several alignment alternatives were identified for the study areas. The alternatives were generated based upon consideration of meeting the design parameters as described previously and on input from discussions with the local landowners. Refinements of the initial alignments were added as new information was made available from input at the public meetings. The alternatives that were considered for both segments (South and North) are shown on Figure 1 and Figure 2 respectively. The selected alternatives were then evaluated using the following specific criterion which is also shown in more detail in Table 1: Geometry Public Support Transportation Effectiveness Environmental Impacts Right of Way Safety Cost An evaluation matrix was used to then score all of the alignment alternatives for both the South and North Segments. Each criterion was assigned weight factors to be utilized as part of the overall scoring as shown in Tables 2 and 3. 3 1 'a,, ve, q d a) o p aY 4 t a4 ,l" - x y � fit; •�> ‘, se... # 4 e.y' t � ttFi `��,Yv.. ' fi o , t " tile' y t �y� , [g ° R • w b ". s "k s . � Th. ,' ue` r �_ -.� i 0- 3 -a e. t 1 lS �. Y; L " 4fi�S �S 4} r t /4 ?,, w.. 11 fir^ z rF '�- .��, �x X � 5 s✓ + 4 a.,,i.4" ' qtr � r y 1 dt !r -M.•4 ' .q ms - �+ ₹ 1 R TS N N D �.. i 44 I I ` y y{ � , y . ;. ', '• 1 ' !, -Qr.' II(4. fr! 4,‘ - I t.„....;....,,,,,, L. l',"1.,, 4.4tfri; t Fi I `GcC,7 .• I H' brth ). > �Diill \III` i A� `�. ' i.44 �t „.� Tit. .-.. . '� ., I ; vA . + ( ' , • I • . p N >. a `o H al C a) c o' s ° d EC9 , a' 8.. a) 3 m O a)D - C O N a) a) a3 L m a N _ . as a) O) N C a) — ,r (O y W T a) .j O U a s a`) c d , m a a) EL a E -' a) a c -c ii) -c 3 E -� .. a) o o N W a) a) W C J m a) E 2' 0 O > O) a) L E O N -c a) c a) 2 O O y Q) C `� O C a) 8 a) L O ra N m- a N . O CO C co 3'.,. a) L co C . O E 3 a> u ≥ E V — C > a o , ° a) rn s '',. a c m >: ,� 0 ' 3 a it) o 0 ° a '- E a) r O a) a) ..TS o t - ' O3 o m a) c ' o c 3 E m ° a 0 : ° > d L 3 -o m' co , c a ° ° a Y O) O � Lj y0 N = D C O OO C a),. -O .D a' E N.. U U O w N O O w a) c0 o a) O '. a) y � .E, a) UL.. O.. O 7 N _C a1 a3 O (0 ..4 a) O) T `ar °) c c ° a a E a o c g', � � N@ — ° E L 3.9O) c o u) m a) b O o 0) ` W C � E a a " a° 5O 8 C 'N id, a) C .C ' al L. � y 0 0 > a) @ C a 2N L O Ol�', E 0 0 (0 > E O -° - O. O. c m▪em a C O U a) L y'. X °_drutit C o U N C ` a) o C 1�1 ° N O °'' ° N O O ° N d >. MC o C ... C '.I� G N E G w y a) O. o ' ti 3 m C = E m OG a a C aa)) E o '.= w o m E O Q n0 'to a s c o. w O a E o CO W .f°g. . tpl l9 U O C to d c c .65 _ aai c �a RS cu o a) n ) a) a 0 O a) Q t i° W w _ a Q c� o ¢ c V I ) g § : ) . ( .- , ) co | \ \ Cu — — o -c ' _ co CO I2 _• _ \ ) ico c \ ) » 1 _ _ ( i ) \ / 7 O 43 2 iii / ) co co | 01C ® - z - k ) \ \ COo * s 00 Fc \/4- \ ) / \ \ § / k — ( 2 Cu } / co \ a o \ ` E § ) t } — y k \ k \ ) \ —C 03 © _ k 2 '- Co o ( / C • � = _C / / $ } co\ \ TS ; / \ \ \ / Cu \ { C0 .\ . C.) - � ` / / 3 ( $ { Z / ) 2 2 a ) ) § k _ \ f \ § § 2 § a) § { ( | 2a \ \ ) - | k ) ( E8 ≥CD § \ § / + R 2 \ § ® 7 ] / �) - | 34 & 2 ( # 2 \ k % /a ) ■co [k 2 ) 2 [ f | \ ` » _ O ; � 8 ( \ 2x ) /�\ / c / r \ _ 2 ± % k 4E & ] 2 / a O1D M 101) ; ® m ....6N, / . \ _ co 0 § , j , CO �§ \ iii jj —__ 2 i / \ 4 ; G ) / _ lie Me a G o 0 0 0 a a c ° '1 N a N ZV r r r N — C ` — m p > d .. O `�' N W • N N N a s NOi 7 N M M N Co M M RI i el — s- c t N V oi ei N °1 _ V ZV V } £ •z o.Ott TI N N N 1- 1- NN N N m M M M °! M N N NCD a .)- NNN cc to c co t co t co ru. — F--- E ' m E E 0 iii8 C7 ° m 3 ..lift m ° a It c O a J W mto m a a E -- m c c o > I- am a Q a ~ > m co P c Si ≥ 2 a o G 1... Q U m 0 a- • m 145 m ~ Q o { - a t > m C m t. a m e 3 a >, CO E O o ~ a rtca i O m W U liii a U u aan— a 't° Eea° E `° a a b s 3 c ca o jiit lila' W =o , flH _ t4• 3 � a � � �i4 C E u a o 1731 >, r O ° a c g c d itsan0 in u, o ti ti • Cf) N N • • t 2 CO CO N CO T- 1A c I )- -0 r t Q f t0 1CM• Nice) co a d C i< 1 .Or > •C2,1) 2> d _' co C O L c tal P. U o F-- Q m ° m co b , Q m a) tb i) "' s o r 1 oo ..._ m� �� U j m L _ 1:4 Q� Ny y' 7%. N 4144 Ili1 U h V — Its- 318 I- — ' o 0 4 0 0 0 'n V m O ad Or O ' z — G C. a O N N O r O N N O N .- O N N a N N O M N N N N V 7 6f CO — 0 .O CC a a 0 0 0 0 I— N co of m v ad of 1 N — L 0 O Z T 15 O ` 0 L p, O O N N N ? v : 1M N In t • N rIr CA a N N n• N N 4 N N C FC 0 — Q E t a Z , 0 o 0 0 0 in o v> _ ai o C: O — V of Q r L J Ci 0_ C G Z C c . I � ._ ° a° o o O. 0 J O O 4J 1(1 N in a �f1 0 in 1f1 _ V V M CO CO ly M M NN '<t7 C C 0 C U f Q y — 3 o 0 0 tri O o 'Q. — 1 m Yf ' Z E a to m a a `m °m y � > jE E rn N x (7 ID v 2 m w g1 : i m it mAto c L >mt- Q w z d t N 3 CO 1 0 2 c ° maim " a m CO � � o o � ctis � `S ],amm ¢cm E 0 � JY LU � 't curie ° c ; � E $ � > a.— m CS — �� 4 in E= J NDjilQ OH V Otia T m � a �� O ° o on m •> a H 40 Miiii 47, m — M 0 a I.- w S .- co t) in - S 4 • a o — s'' n e 0 3 — w o CO w C CO E _ > D t' Q D vs 0. f N W r L• C 3c .� V — cc ¢ a W jd i " ro-' — �' O F a' O ts _ d a t w m c t- C. o t R in — 5 O i U 0 y }1 CC v coco .® � j t fetes TWO RIVERS PARKWAY _ wokAlternative Alignment Study pgpDp Weld County Public Works Department South Segment (SH 60) - Both alignment options begin at State Highway 60 and end at WCR 378. It is anticipated that both intersections would be improved when this project is constructed. CDOT is working on designs for constructing a traffic signal at the SH 60 intersection. Intersection improvements will be designed - to accommodate the new alignment and create a more standard signalized intersection. All curves were designed at 1900 foot radiuses to accommodate 55 mph speed limits. The existing roadway would remain as a County road and serve local traffic needs. Option 1 Option 1 takes a direct northern route along the section line from SH 60 until it crosses the Big Thompson River. At that point it turns NE and follows the RR tracks until it aligns with the existing - Two Rivers Parkway. It is anticipated that WCR 378 would be reconstructed to make a "T"- intersection into Two Rivers. Local landowners were involved in the preliminary alignment phase in order to minimize negative impacts to their properties. This alignment is intended to avoid the — existing water monitoring wells on the waste management site. The new bridge required with this option will be located at the most optimal horizontal alignment in order to minimize costs. — Option 2 Option 2 also begins at SH 60 aligning with the new signal improvements by CDOT. The first — curve begins on the north side of the first parcel of land, minimizing parcel remnants, and then angling NE to cross the river at a point to minimize the skew angle on the bridge. The alignment then curves north to align with the existing Two Rivers alignment utilizing a large portion of the — existing roadway. Intersection improvements at WCR 378 are needed to maximize safety and efficiency. — Preferred Option (South Segment) - As shown in the evaluation matrix, Option 1 emerged as the best alignment. This alignment minimizes negative impacts to properties as well as utilizing the most cost efficient bridge crossing. - 12 ii&Vim' TWO RIVERS PARKWAY Alternative Alignment Study wipe COLORADO Weld County Public Works Department North Segment (SH 392) All north alignment options begin at the south end of the curve on WCR 64.5 and ends at SH 392 or just north of SH 392 (Option 1). All options will require a new RR crossing east of the existing — crossing and the existing WCR 64.5 will be constructed as a "T'-intersection onto Two Rivers Parkway. The curves shown to make this connection should be designed with safe curves per AASHTO standards and to minimize impacts to local properties. It is anticipated that the Colorado — and Southern RR will require the existing crossing to be abandoned before permitting a new crossing. By closing the existing RR crossing, a cul-de-sac turnaround will likely be required on the north side of the tracks. All curves were designed at 1900 foot radiuses to accommodate 55 — mph speed limits. The existing roadway would remain as a County road and serve local traffic needs. — Option 1 Option 1 begins north of "O" Street following the section line of Two Rivers Parkway. As the road — approaches WCR 66, it heads NW and connects back into the existing roadway just south of Bridge No. 27/66A over the Greeley/Loveland Canal No. 2. The alignment continues north and crosses SH 392 at a perpendicular alignment to SH 392. Once beyond the existing residence — located on the north side of SH 392, the road heads SE connecting back into the existing alignment. All curves were designed at 1900 foot radiuses to accommodate 55 mph speed limits. Minimizing negative impacts to local residences while utilizing as much of the existing roadway as - possible was the premise for this option. Option 2 Option 2 begins at the same location as Option 1 and continues north along the section line _ alignment and ends at SH 392. This is the shortest route possible. The location of the roadway would minimize impacts to local residences if it were situated adjacent to the east easement line of the power company. A new bridge will need to be constructed across the Greeley/Loveland Canal. Federal bridge funding would be available to replace the existing bridge at a new section line location. The federal funding would require removal of the existing bridge and terminating the existing roadway on either side of the crossing. Option 3 - Option 3 and Option 2 alignments are identical except the existing bridge across the Greeley/Loveland Canal No. 2 would not be removed and a new bridge would be constructed across the canal. This option was supported by the local residents. 13 — (it \ TWO RIVERS PARKWAY walkAlternative Alignment Stidy pgpDp Weld County Public Works Department Preferred Option (North Segment) Option 3 was selected as the preferred alignment for many reasons as shown in the evaluation matrix. This option was also preferred by the majority of attendees at the public open house — meetings. 6. RECOMMENDATIONS Alignments - The location of the preferred alignments is approximate to allow for subtle changes and flexibility to fit future developments within the corridor. Although changes are expected, the overall functionality of the arterials should not be compromised as a result of any modifications. As with - other Strategic Roads within Weld County, the future arterials may be built in phases. An interim section constructed initially and the ultimate roadway section being constructed as traffic demands increase. Either way, the ultimate ROW width shall be preserved initially. The interim and ultimate sections are shown in Figure 5. Implementation Process — The preferred alignment should be used as a tool to acquire right of way as future development occurs along the corridor. — NOTE: All information used to study the area is considered to be conceptual and more detailed design will need to be performed before final alignments are established. 14 Cl) d w mss, LL 0- el 9 y t Proposed ROW = 140' ` , . : - e�' '¢ 1 , 4 +. 4 {ia F * E I a � t L% A# n _"C5" _r.. f -I. ti I • .„.Tier ♦ yi;' ,J _ , y•W a i • 1.•2,1 f. i F , 40 osil 444144‘„ � - t- _f! :iii, mo w .. , ca C y _.YID a� _ a.- a� w el 9 CO TIC a./�` .i fw✓'F'^'�Y' �^ fir P•r"4 .ice?r" ` ��t W "F Pte. 1, / pa - C.; '4 x $ #E. 3f T5 ele ,g, - / i //.Y a r. 1 + I F er;, ? e. , i s"-z ° ritA 3 w } a ry e y : �, wi �. 5 F '.y. Ask-r a 'x �n a , gyp+ IC *6 ' ' ,� • �` - .. P� dF � t Y ! r , • } Y wff ,f P$ F' a' f ,, ' 4 ' -111 € ' F,.. 1 ' .') f r C., v a, C) , , ._ . - t 1 '\1" - 6 fi r a: m:. / it - 4 !I 1 31 .IC‘S 4 _ f, y°` t J I u ill 4 1 H.'L4iEy' '. "-- S ,.f a t ; ` s ig —' ik-: "sill.s, • 44. a, ° ��' , I j j u r __ G E iII 4 w. k,. T h�r 1 g AtRj _: - - JE _ _ _.j. t `\ I `^v-a , i I _ti r3e ii g Typica Sections Figure 5 Weld County The roadway may be initially built as a 2-lane facility or a Strategic Roadway combination of 2-lanes and 4-lanes, depending upon Major Arterial future traffic projections. Accomodations for future widening are being made now,to avoid additional impacts when capacity improvements are needed. • ...E LANE lAWIE Interim Cross Section 1.p COPMOOR ROPY _..............._.....__... .. r LAW LAN VIII • sunlit it r arm W2 err MedanDO , LAW mom Ultimate Cross Section 40 COMMON RdY r siorrotr IOW OM LE OuriPt .«� LANE LANE M-2.Medan Dial ram) uw. Ultimate Cross Section Near Intersections 17 ( 6 /2ylizko 4,v)2 ai 64/e 7 RESOLUTION RE: ACCEPT RECOMMENDATIONS OF ALIGNMENT OPTIONS FROM COUNTY ROAD 27 (TWO RIVERS PARKWAY) ALTERNATIVE ALIGNMENT STUDY TO BE USED BY WELD COUNTY FOR FUTURE TRANSPORTATION PLANNING WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, pursuant to Colorado statute and the Weld County Home Rule Charter, is vested with the authority of administering the affairs of Weld County, Colorado, and WHEREAS,transportation plans along County Road("CR")27(the"Two Rivers Parkway") have consistently identified a need for planning alignments to allow for optimum movement of traffic along said roadway, and WHEREAS, previously, the Board of County Commissioners commissioned a study to determine various alternative alignments for said roadway, and WHEREAS,the"Weld County Road 27(Two Rivers Parkway)Alternative Alignment Study," dated February, 2007, identifies and recommends two options for the optimal alignment of said roadway,those being Option 3 for the north end of said roadway and Option 1 for the south end,and WHEREAS,accepting these recommendations now will allow Weld County and/or affected municipalities to preserve needed rights-of-way for the recommended arterials so as to allow construction when the optimal alignments are needed,and allows for implementation in an orderly fashion with the goal of minimizing impacts to adjacent properties in the future. NOW,THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, that, as shown and recommended in the "Weld County Road 27(Two Rivers Parkway)Alternative Alignment Study,"dated February, 2007, Option 3 for the north end of said roadway and Option 1 for the south end be, and hereby are, accepted to be used by Weld County for future transportation planning for the alignments of said roadway. 2007-** EG0056 ACCEPT RECOMMENDATIONS OF ALIGNMENT OPTIONS FROM WELD COUNTY ROAD 27 (TWO RIVERS PARKWAY)ALTERNATIVE ALIGNMENT STUDY PAGE 2 The above and foregoing Resolution was,on motion duly made and seconded,adopted by the following vote on the 11th day of June, A.D., 2007. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY, COLORADO ATTEST: David E. Long, Chair Weld County Clerk to the Board William H. Jerke, Pro-Tem BY: Deputy Clerk to the Board William F. Garcia APPROVED AS TO FORM: Robert D. Masden County Attorney Douglas Rademacher Date of signature: 2007-** EG0056 CERTIFICATE OF MAILING The undersigned hereby certifies that a true and correct copy of the foregoing Notice of Hearing was placed in the United States mail, first class mail, postage prepaid, addressed to the following property owners. DATED this 1st day of June, 2007. BRAVO INTERESTS LLLP BEVERLEE ALLISON 6425 CLEARWATER DRIVE 13165 WELD COUNTY ROAD 64 LOVELAND CO 80538 GREELEY CO 80631 HARRY AND ESTHER BRUNTZ HENRY AND LAVONNA AMEN 12801 WELD COUNTY ROAD 64.5 12902 HIGHWAY 392 GREELEY CO 80631 GREELEY CO 80634 CAMAS COLORADO INC SHAUN AMUNDSEN 1707 COLE BOULEVARD #100 2113 RIVER WEST DRIVE GOLDEN CO 80235 WINDSOR CO 80550 CG'S INVESTMENTS LLC ANTHONY ANTUNA 1924 SEVEN LAKES DRIVE 12598 WELD COUNTY ROAD 64.5 LOVELAND CO 80538 GREELEY CO 80631 GAIL COLEMAN TIMOTHY BATES 12682 SHILO ROAD 13010 HIGHWAY 392 GREELEY CO 80631-9493 GREELEY CO 80631 JEFF COOK DANIEL BECKLE 12691 WELD COUNTY ROAD 64.5 32791 WELD COUNTY ROAD 27 GREELEY CO 80631 GREELEY CO 80634 VAUGHN COOK VIVIAN BEST 5412 EAST COUNTY ROAD 32E 12437 HIGHWAY 392 FORT COLLINS CO 80528 GREELEY CO 80631-9313 COUNTRY VIEW ESTATES LLC GORDON BOERSMA 1092 KIVA CIRCLE 9088 GOLDEN FIELDS LANE WINDSOR CO 80550 LOVELAND CO 80537 HAROLD AND MADELINE DANIELS BRACEWELL PUD HOMEOWNERS' PO BOX 180 ASSOCIATION MILLIKEN CO 80543-0180 C/O WILLIAM ROBERTS 12690 SHILOH ROAD GREELEY CO 80631 WALTER AND HAROLD AND MADELINE DANIELS 1931 HILLROSE DRIVE LOVELAND CO 80538 CERTIFICATE OF MAILING - TWO RIVERS PARKWAY (WCR27) ALTERNATIVE ALIGNMENT STUDY PAGE 2 COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF RUTH FIRESTIEN TRANSPORTATION 30953 WELD COUNTY ROAD 27 4201 EAST ARKANSAS AVENUE GREELEY CO 80631 DENVER CO 80222 FIVE RIVERS RANCH CATTLE DAVE AND LINDA DIMITT FEEDING LLC PO BOX 554 5408 IDYLWILD TRAIL WINDSOR CO 80550 BOULDER CO 80301 KURT AND JEANINE DODGE ARTHUR GARCIA 525 1ST AVENUE 13998 COUNTY ROAD 378 LASALLE CO 80645-3223 MILLIKEN CO 80543-9203 DENNIS DOUGHERTY J. MARK GEORGE 2568 56TH AVENUE 6801 COUNTY ROAD 1 GREELEY CO 80634 WINDSOR CO 80550 NORMAN EMERSON JOHN AND MICHELLE GOAD JR 13237 WELD COUNTY ROAD 66 PO BOX 361 GREELEY CO 80631 WINDSOR CO 80550 ANDREW FARAGO ELSIE GOETZEL TRUSTEE 1092 KIVA CIRCLE 13578 WELD COUNTY ROAD 66 WINDSOR CO 80550 GREELEY CO 80631 ROBERTA FEATHER RICHARD AND MARY ANN GOETZEL 12435 HIGHWAY 392 13489 WELD COUNTY ROAD 66 GREELEY CO 80631 GREELEY CO 80631 STEVEN FIEGEL GEORGE HALL 32801 WELD COUNTY ROAD 27 301 CENTENNIAL DRIVE GREELEY CO 80631 MILLIKEN CO 80543 GERALD FIRESTIEN ELLA MARIE HAYES TRUSTEE 12856 WELD COUNTY ROAD 66 PO BOX 773 GREELEY CO 80631 SARATOGA WY 82331 GERALD FIRESTIEN JAMES HERBST AND MARK FIRESTEIN 12799 WELD COUNTY ROAD 64.5 12600 WELD COUNTY ROAD 66 GREELEY CO 80631 GREELEY CO 80631 LEONARD HOLLADAY 12714 SHILO ROAD GREELEY CO 80631 CERTIFICATE OF MAILING - TWO RIVERS PARKWAY (WCR27) ALTERNATIVE ALIGNMENT STUDY PAGE 3 KALE OIL GAS LLC M A LINBLAD LLC 12406 WELD COUNTY ROAD 64.5 13313 HIGHWAY 392 GREELEY CO 80631 GREELEY CO 80631 ALBERT AND KAREN KAMMERZELL MBM ENTERPRISES LLC 13603 WELD COUNTY ROAD 396 6425 CLEARWATER DRIVE MILLIKEN CO 80543 LOVELAND CO 80538 DOUG KAMMERZELL LOWELL MILLER 12423 STATE HIGHWAY 60 12242 WELD COUNTY ROAD 66 MILLIKEN CO 80543 GREELEY CO 80631 EUGENE AND JANET KAMMERZELL DAVID MITCHELL 22465 HIGHWAY 60 32799 WELD COUNTY ROAD 27 MILLIKEN CO 80543 GREELEY CO 80631 VERN KAMMERZELL ED ORR 12614 HIGHWAY 60 826 9TH STREET #200 MILLIKEN CO 80543 GREELEY CO 80631 ROBERT AND GLORIA KESSLER JOHN AND MARILYN ORTH PO BOX 624 33062 WELD COUNTY ROAD 25 FORT COLLINS CO 80522 GREELEY CO 80631 KIM LAWRENCE RICHARD AND PHYLLIS PODTBURG 12702 SHILO ROAD 12669 WELD COUNTY ROAD 66 GREELEY CO 80631-9493 GREELEY CO 80631 JOHN AND SANDRA LEE 13186 HIGHWAY 392 RANGEVIEW ESTATES LLC GREELEY CO 80631 1092 KIVA CIRCLE WINDSOR CO 80550 ROBERT AND DIANE LEISY RML PROPERTY INVESTORS LLC 12937 HIGHWAY 392 4643 SOUTH ULSTER STREET GREELEY CO 80631 SUITE 1300 DENVER CO 80237-2868 EDWARD LENERS 1801 PINECREST LANE WILLIAM ROBERTS GREELEY CO 80631 12690 SHILOH ROAD GREELEY CO 80631 LEWIS LOWE PO BOX 271192 FORT COLLINS CO 80527-1192 CERTIFICATE OF MAILING - TWO RIVERS PARKWAY (WCR27) ALTERNATIVE ALIGNMENT STUDY PAGE 4 SCHRAEDER LIVING TRUST RICHARD WARKENTIN 31552 WELD COUNTY ROAD 27 6380 WEST 10TH STREET#22 GREELEY CO 80631 GREELEY CO 80634 DALE SELLMER WASTE MANAGEMENT 13276 WELD COUNTY ROAD 64 CORPORATION GREELEY CO 80631 C/O MARVIN F. POWER AND COMPANY DONNA SHABLE PO BOX 802206 22961 WELD COUNTY ROAD 27.5 DALLAS TX 75380-2206 MILLIKEN CO 80543 WILLIAM AND LINDA WIGHAM GLENN SMITH 32706 WELD COUNTY ROAD 27 1640 37TH AVENUE GREELEY CO 80631 GREELEY CO 80634 ERIC AND JANICE WILKINSON STETSON HOMES LLC 12232 HIGHWAY 392 1834 SEVEN LAKES DRIVE GREELEY CO 80631-9357 LOVELAND CO 80538 PATRICIA WILLCUTTS EDWARD AND ELIZABETH 32500 WELD COUNTY ROAD 27 STREHLOW GREELEY CO 80631 32560 WELD COUNTY ROAD 27 GREELEY CO 80631 J _947z))7c, JOE STRICKLIN Deputy Clerk to the Board 7 32550 WELD COUNTY ROAD 27 GREELEY CO 80631 SW MILLIKEN II LLC 333 WEST HAMPDEN AVENUE #810 ENGLEWOOD CO 80110 LARRY AND ELLEN THAYER 1730 WATERFORD LANE FORT COLLINS CO 80525 MARY TIGGES 12404 WELD COUNTY ROAD 64.5 GREELEY CO 80631 LARRY WARKENTIN 12691 WELD COUNTY ROAD 64.5 GREELEY CO 80631 Hello