HomeMy WebLinkAbout820381.tiff MINUTES OF THE WELD COUNTY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
March 24, 1983
A regular meeting of the Weld County Board of Adjustment was held on March 24, 1983,
at 2:45 p.m. in the Weld County Centennial Building, 915 10th Street, Greeley,
Colorado in the Commissioners' Hearing Room. The meeting was called to order by
the Chairman, Gordon Lacy.
Tape 26 - Side 2
ROLL CALL
Jim Parker Absent - Excused ` 1' c
Ruth McElrath Present [� ��.� ,�
1
Rhonda Giles Present tr''t 2 3 1983
'f
Marion Richter Present
Willis Piper Present
Frank Stewart Present pRE7.EY. COLO.
Shirley Rein Present
Gordon Lacy Present
Mark Weston Absent
Also Present: Greg Oxenfeld, Current Planner, Russ Anson, Assistant County
Attorney, and Bobbie Good, Secretary
A quorum was present
The minutes of the last regular meeting held on February 10, 1983 were approved
as distributed.
CASE NUMBER: BOA-852:83:3
APPLICANT: Raymond 0. Ferrell
REQUEST: A variance of five (5) feet, six (6) inches from the twenty (20) foot
setback requirement in the "R-5" (Residential) Zone District as set
forth in Section 32.7.4 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 19, Block 5, Hill-N-Park Mobile Home Subdivision
LOCATION: 3821 Yosemite Drive, Greeley, Colorado
PROPOSAL: Greg Oxenfeld stated the applicant proposes to build a garage
on the southeast portion of his lot and needs approval of a
five (5) foot six (6) inch variance from the required twenty (20)
foot setback requirement in the Residential "5" Zone District
APPEARANCE: Raymond 0. Ferrell, property owner, appeared and stated his reasons
for applying for this requested variance.
The Chairman called for discussion from the audience. There was none.
The Chairman asked Greg Oxenfeld to read the recommendations of the Department
of Planning Services staff.
820381
)1L %IL-C.-+�. /.. ��U ;�-
MINUTES OF THE WELD COUNTY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
Page 2
March 24, 1983
MOTION:
Rhonda Giles moved BOA-852:83:3 be approved by the Board of Adjustment for the
reasons outlined by the Department of Planning Services staff and the testimony
given by Mr. Ferrell. Motion seconded by Shirley Rein.
The Chairman called for discussion from the members of the Board of Adjustment.
Discussion followed.
The Chairman asked the Secretary to poll the members of the Board of Adjustment
for their decision. Ruth McElrath - yes; Rhonda Giles - yes; Marion Richter -
yes; Willis Piper - yes; Frank Stewart - yes; Shirley Rein - yes; Gordon Lacy -
yes. Motion carried unanimously.
CASE NUMBER: BOA-851:83:2
REQUEST: A sign variance of seven hundred nine (709) additional square
feet and an additional thirty-eight (38) feet in height; and
an additional two (2) directional signs, plus two (2) signs
attached to the wall, but extending three (3) feet above the
roof line; and a fifteen (15) foot setback variance for the
identification sign along Colorado State Highway 119; and a
ten (10) foot variance for an air and water island
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the SE4, Section 3, Township 2 North, Range
68 West of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado
LOCATION: Approximately 3.5 miles northwest of Firestone at Del Camino
Greg Oxenfeld stated the applicant proposes to locate signs for a self-service
fuel center with a convenience store and delicatessin. Each variance is requested
because of the distance (approximately 1/8 mile) of the business from Interstate
25.
APPEARANCE: Jeff Beddingfield, Attorney, representing the Musket Corporation,
and Marty Ruff and Larry Thompson, employees of the Musket Corporation
Tape 27 - Side 1
Mr. Beddingfield explained the reasons for the requested variances and dis-
tributed pictures of the standard "Love's Stop" signage. He explained the
company's request for the additional signs and the setback variance request
for the identification sign along Highway 119. He stated the request for the ten
foot variance for the air and water island was primarily for safety. He also
MINUTES OF THE WELD COUNTY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
Page 3
March 24, 1983
-explained the routes for vehicular and truck traffic entering and exiting from
the property so that smaller vehicles did not mix with the heavier truck traffic.
The Chairman called for discussion from the audience. There was none..
The Chairman asked Greg Oxenfeld to read the recommendations of the Department
of Planning Services staff, which was for denial.
MOTION:
Frank Stewart moved BOA-851:83:2 be approved because he did feel that: (1) special
conditions and circumstances do exist which are peculiar to the lot and building;
(2) the signage is compatible with the existing signs in the area; (3) safety is
the primary reason for the request for the smaller directional signs and the
location of the air and water island; and (4) the Colorado State Highway Department
had no objections to this request.
Motion seconded by Ruth McElrath.
The Chairman called for discussion from the Board of Adjustment. Discussion
followed.
The Chairman asked the Secretary to poll the members of the Board of Adjustment
for their decision. Ruth McElrath - yes; Rhonda Giles - yes; Marion Richter -
yes; Willis Piper - no; Frank Stewart - yes; Shirley Rein - yes; Gordon Lacy -
yes. Motion carried with six voting for and one against the motion.
Tape 27 - Side 2
The meeting was adjourned at 3:40 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
l \ j
Bobbie Good, Secretary
BEFORE THE WELD COUNTY, COLORADO BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
MOTION TO GRANT OR DENY APPEAL
Case No. 852:83:3 Date March 24, 1983
APPEAL OF Raymond 0. Ferrell
Address 3821 Yosemite Drive, Greeley, Colorado 80634
Moved by Rhonda Giles that the following resol-
ution be introduced for passage by the Weld County Board of Adjust-
ment :
Be it resolved by the Weld County Board of Adjustment that
the appeal of Raymond 0. Ferrell
for a variance or appeal described as:
Five feet (5') six inches (6") from the setback requirement of twenty feet
(20') from the existing right-of-way in an "R-5" (Residential) Zone District.
on the following described property :
Lot 19, Block 5, Hill-n-Park Subdivision.
be granted ( R1 for the following reasons :
1. The variance requested is the minimum variance possible for making reasonable
use of the lot for placement of the garage;
2. The granting of the variance will be in harmony with the purpose and intent
of this ordinance, and will not be injurious to the public health, safety or
welfare of the surrounding land uses;
3. The Board of Adjustment has not received any objections to this request;
A. It is the Board of Adjustment's opinion that this requested relief is not
detrimental to the public good or contrary to the purpose and intent of the
Weld County Zoning Ordinance and the Residential "5" Zone District.
5. The location of the lot and the location of the mobile home on the lot makes the
requested placement of the garage a reasonable location.
•
Motion seconded by�a �_e
Vote: For Granting of Appea : For Denial of Appeal :
p
/
ik
V¢ �....TY, _.. . V1E- _
804-80-034
BEFORE THE WELD COUNTY, COLORADO BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
MOTION TO GRANT OR DENY APPEAL
Case No.851:83:2 Date March 24, 1983
APPEAL OF The Musket Corporation
Address
Oklahoma 73176
Moved that the following resol-
ution b introduced fo . passage by the Weld County Board of Adjust-
ment :
Be it resolved by the Weld County Board of Adjustment that
the appeal of The Musket Corporation
-for a variance or appeal described as :
1. An additional 709 square feet to the maximum area net face of 150
square feet allowed by right and_an additional 'i8 feet ia_heighr rip
the 40 foot allowed by ght• (SAE ADDITrnNA, w
TACEELLSIlarn—
on the following described property :
Part of the SEZ, Section 3. T2N. R68W of the 6th P.M. . Weld County.
Colorado
be granted (i:WH CM) for the following reasons :
Based upon a review of the submitted application materials and other relevant
information regarding the request, the Board of Adjustment approved this request
for the following reasons:
1. That special conditions and circumstances do exist which are peculiar
to this lot and building;
• 2. The proposed signage is compatible with the existing signs in the area;
3. Safety is the primary reason for smaller directional signs and the
location of the air and water island;
4. The Colorado State Highway Department had no objections to this request.
Motion seconded by
e ,`'/// �
Vote: For Grantin of Appeal : For Denial of Appeal :
•
NIO
77 ter/
804-80-034
The Musket Corporation
March 24, 1983
Page 2
2. An additional two (2) directional signs to the two (2) allowed
by right, plus two (2) signs attached to the wall, but extending
three (3) feet above the roof line where the extension is not
-allowed by right;
3. A fifteen (15) foot setback variance from the twenty-five (25)
foot required setback for the identification sign along Highway
119; and
4. A fifteen (15) foot setback variance for one of the directional
signs and a ten (10) foot setback variance for an air and water
island, both from the twenty-five (25) foot required setback.
Hello