Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20073019.tiff Esther Gesick From: Bill Jerke Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2007 2:26 PM To: Esther Gesick Subject: FW: Stop Uranium Mining in Northern Colorado Original Message From: Nick Bair [mailto:bairinc@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2007 12:16 PM To: Dave Long; Douglas Rademacher; Rob Masden; Bill Jerke; William Garcia; Bruce Barker; Trevor Jiricek; Monica Mika Subject: Stop Uranium Mining in Northern Colorado To whom it may concern, I have serious concerns about the proposed uranium mining project in northern Colorado near Nunn. Everything I have read about uranium mining in the west indicates it cannot be done without significant risk to both local and regional water supplies. There are also potentially dire consequences to human health in the immediate vicinity of the mining. We don't need a uranium mine in northern Colorado. As my representative, I urge you to put a stop to it now. Thank you. Nick Bair 004,71“ CneNc j0L /2161 Da- -o7 1 2007-3019 Dear William Jerke, In November of 2005 we were able to move into our new home.The dream of living in the country away from city lights,air and noise pollution had come true.we have wanted this life style for several years in hopes of having a plan for our retirement years and gave up our last dime for the investment of this acreage for our future.We were glad and compliant to the CRP restrictions we bought into. Now,only a few months later we find that a Canadian company had bought the adjoining land and wants to mine it. WHY DIDN'T THE TRUSTED SERVANTS OF WELD COUNTY INFORM US OF THIS!We would NEVER have come here! Our property value will surely decline dramatically with a`gravel pit'in our`front yard'. We face a future of light pollution,water pollution,noise pollution,and air pollution.More so than any urban owned homes.Powertech offered us$100.00 to come onto our property via a sweet and syrupy contract,to test the soil and vegetation. This is truly rude to the property owners of who's lives they are disturbing.We asked for contract changes,but they said`We'll just put you down as unwilling to cooperate'.This is not true,but it did show their selfishness and non commitment to their project. Hoping for some answers at the Nunn/Powertech town meeting,on July 19'",we only walked away emotional and confused.The'spin doctors'they sent could or would not answer our questions adequately and alleviate our concerns on what`treatment'they would use in their ponds waste water and how they would protect our life giving waters:only stating"We have put up Bonds to insure this doesn't happen"Does that mean we will filter the toxins through wads of money? Do you know that the Nunn aquifer flows into the front range of Fort Collins,Boulder,and Greely?When asked about light pollution Mr.Blubaugh stated:"I'm sure we will do everything we can to keep the glare down"Do YOU believe that?When asked about the noise pollution there was no answer. The clouds of dust will choke the air and the gravel roads could become washboards and rutted.How will Weld county's economy deal with the polluted air and water,the damaged roads,and scaring of the landscape?I believe the inner conflicts of the Federal government do not allow them to sufficiently commit to the research and challenges of the mining industries,and are often woefully inadequate.We need to know how Powertech will hold themselves exempt from its obligations.So far they have offered only far-fetched dreams.How will they respond if they fail to deliver?What about the occasional`accident'?If we can not thwart them.Lets ask them to double reinforce their containment structures.County employment will be limited to a few short months.Then only a few maintenance employees will be needed. Already in the last two weeks of their'test drilling',our water has turned from a light sandy brown to a ash gray! We are building a neighbor hood out here of good productive members of the Weld County community. Come and see how beautiful it is.Have you driven here to see what's going on?Meadowlarks abound.Antelope have been counted to over 300 in a herd. Please,please do not allow this neighborhood to become an industrial site! With Colorado gaining a reputation as up and coming Green conscious state this is a slap in the face to those intelligent hard working people that are working on the'cool fuels'of our future.There should be a promotion of energy efficient products such as light bulbs and building materials along with clean energy technologies. We know that farms have one of the lowest failure rates of any industry even if the farm subsidy dollars do go to the millionaires. The boom and bust cycle of this industry is often out of sync with our government revenue.Can we set aside money to cover an economic dip with out raising taxes? U3O8 is a finite resource and Weld county needs to plan for the future.The county owned roads should be maintained by Powertech to Weld County standards.U3O8 is not cheap,and extremely more dangerous that wind, solar,and other forms of power generation. Who will ensure public safety and who will pay for any untoward effects?I for one will expose Powertech for any and all damages that might occur.The essay from Gorski and Voss claim that the native ground H2O must be returned to the same quality. What is it going to become?! Your knowledge and powers are direly needed.And,not only should Weld County should be protecting its occupants,but the State as well. Frightened and hopefully not alone, Jody Shine 47059 WCR 23 Nunn,Co. $ n 80648 O Sshines@peoplepc.com (Tl 3� August 8,2007 C) O N Nn cn P.S. I've sent this via postal mail,since there was no response to my e-mails. M J —O rn D rn-i v CS N-< .D i 8'17 �9 as of Esther Gesick From: Bill Jerke Sent: Friday, September 07, 2007 11:24 AM To: Esther Gesick Subject: FW: Proposed Uranium Mining Original Message From: hughesnet user [mailto:thunderclap@hughes.net] Sent: Friday, September 07, 2007 10:08 AM To: Bill Jerke Cc: William Garcia Subject: Proposed Uranium Mining I would like to know what the county's position is on this subject! I would also like to know why there has not been anyone attending meetings or letting the people affected know what the county is proposing to do (if anything) ? From everything I have read and heard it seems this subject is being ignored! I hope you can inform me otherwise. There are a lot of un-happy people including my self. This is not going to benefit anyone except Power Tech. I would appreciate a response. Thank you! Sincerely, Lindsey R. Hauger /9&/ g-C(47 1 off/ -/ 1-U7 9/10/2007 Mr. Long: I am writing to you regarding the proposed uranium mining here in Northern Colorado. I live in nearby Fort Collins and work in Wellington as a chaplain on a 100-acre farm that doubles as a drug and alcohol rehabilitation program. Obviously,this mining operation hits close to home both figuratively and literally. I am confident that you have heard about all of the damaging environmental impacts that this process will surely have; I assume you know that uranium mining, no matter what the process might be (there is no such thing as "safe mining"), will not and cannot benefit the soil, the water supply, and the lives of the residents and farmers who live on this land. So if this project does not benefit the soil, water, and residents who actually live here in Northern Colorado,who or what will this mining help? The only benefactor in this scheme, I'm afraid, will be Powertech Industries, a mega company that has no relation to Colorado and is not even based in The United States. This is a company driven by greed and nothing more; their goal is to drain the resources from Colorado's land and leave when they have sucked us dry. Let's not kid ourselves here: Powertech does not give a damn about Coloradoans and our land, heritage, and lifestyle. If we allow them,they will bleed us dry, leaving any number of contaminants, poisons, and toxins in their wake, and we as well our children and grandchildren will have to deal with the consequences. The biggest defense I've heard from Powertech is that their mining will "create more jobs." We in Northern Colorado do not care. We have enough jobs—we're doing just fine up here. Even so, if we think that these "jobs" are actually going to stick around once the uranium is gone, we are fools. These are jobs that are only created because Powertech cannot find machines to do these jobs more cheaply. Powertech, despite their claims, is not a company of heroes and saviors coming down to save us from an economic quagmire. This is exploitation and disrespect, plain and simple. In closing, I need you, an elected leader, to know that we in Northern Colorado are depending on you and putting our trust in you. We need you to step up NOW and be a voice for us here in the hot zone. These are our homes, this is our land, and this is our way of life that is being threatened. We need to continue to be stewards of this great land, not mere takers. I, along with numerous other Coloradoans, hope and pray that you will do what is right for our state. Sincerely, �/f A.,(7.G/vim— Brad Rhoda 2022 W.Vine Dr., Fort Collins, CO 80521 PL F(11 • 0/97rn uvt//r'i?77 0q- /9-0-7 Esther Gesick From: Bill Jerke Sent: Monday, September 10, 2007 8:54 AM To: Esther Gesick Subject: FW: Uranium Mining Original Message From: Kevin Hettinger [mailto:kevinhettingerl@yahoo.com] Sent: Friday, September 07, 2007 9:31 PM To: Dave Long; Douglas Rademacher; Rob Masden; Bill Jerke; William Garcia; Trevor Jiricek; Monica Mika Subject: Uranium Mining I have serious concerns about the proposed uranium mining project in northern Colorado near Nunn. Everything I have read about uranium mining in the west indicates it cannot be done without significant risk to both local and regional water supplies. There are also potentially dire consequences to human health in the immediate vicinity of the mining. We don't need a uranium mine in northern Colorado. As my representative, I urge you to put a stop to it now. How can you allow so many families to be effected by one terrible decision. You will force people to live next to such a hazard, or walk away from their homes and start from scratch. To cause peoples properties to become so devalued is a crime! There is no need for uranium mining in such a populated area, it does not belong in our county or state! I expect you will make the right decision and not allow the mines. Thank you Kevin Hettinger Yahoo! oneSearch: Finally, mobile search that gives answers <http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt= 48252/*http://mobile.yahoo.com/mobileweb/oneSearch?refer=1ONXIC> , not web links. Y.i Ocp PO - ' O E rn an m 0 -0 30 m - co _o m D rn=-i 1 Ll8lC1 �' i ,ntriunitel1750 °`r- / 1 -07 Sharon Kahl From: Vicky Sprague Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2007 12:02 PM To: CTB Subject: FW: uranium mining For the file please. Vicky Sprague, Office Manager Board of Weld County Commissioners 915 10th Street, 3rd Floor P. O. Box 758 Greeley CO 80632 Telephone: 970-336-7204 Fax: 970-352-0242 vsprague@co.weld.co.us Original Message From: curt martin (mailto:curtgracemartin@hotmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2007 11:59 AM To: kevin@kevinlundberg.com; wqcd@state.co.us; ggibson@larimer.org; krennels@larimer.org; jackson.dan@epa.gov; Trevor Jiricek; reubanks@larimer.org; steve.tarlton@state.co.us; governor.ritter@state.co.us; steve.johnson.senate@state.co.us; Vicky Sprague Cc: curtgracemartin@hotmail.com Subject: uranium mining my name is grace martin, and I have several health problems including MS. I am concered about this uranium mining I have heard about in northern colorado. Please don't let them do it. I need clean water to drink, if nothing else. I'm also concerned about everyone else's health, and the environment. grace /8c/' 1 Q✓nini-V /c4Trures 09 '/9-07 Sept. 3, 2007 David Long, "The County Commissioners are responsible for the public health policies of all the public health programs county wide." "... Commissioners are required to ... deal in ... personal property... approve and execute contracts ... in the name of the county. Furthermore, "Each Commissioner has primary responsibility for one of the county's five departments, two of them being; Health Services, and Planning Services." This is what is written on the Weld County Public Health web-site, and the Weld County Commissioners web-site. A meeting was held on August 22nd in Ault CO, in which presentations were given regarding potential health impacts, not only for the public, but also for a highly valued underground resource lying beneath Weld County, specifically; water, as it is found, and drawn from, in the Laramie/Fox Hills water bearing sedimentary rock aquifer. Tens of thousands of rural residents depend and rely upon this source for their drinking water, for livestock water, etc. As you well know, Powertech Uranium Co. is seeking permission to extract naturally occurring uranium oxide, that is contained in very minute, extremely low concentration levels, as it is found in the Laramie/Fox formation, using a chemically laden liquid injection pumping process called in situ mining. Had you attended the Ault meeting, you would have been informed of the ominous nature and complex problems associated with the in situ mining process. The difficulty of interpreting and predicting multiple varying factors is not an exact science. The end results of missing even only one detail will result in disaster. Disturbing this sedimentary rock water bearing aquifer via an in situ mining process, that is to say; by pumping chemically laden fluids into that aquifer, and thereby releasing other more concentrated unwanted existing minerals, including selenium, arsenic, radium, etc. to name just a few, of which may not be extracted along with the desired low concentrations of uranium oxide, is not only unwise, but should never even be considered in a drinking water aquifer to begin with! Furthermore, special attention was brought forth and notice made that no Weld County Commissioners were in attendance at the August 22nd meeting. Even the Greeley Tribune reported the lack of attendance by the Weld County Commissioners, in a news article the following day. The radioactive nature of uranium, specifically of it's harmful consequences upon being exposed to it's varying forms, places it into an extremely high level category of importance regarding health and safety issues. For this reason, with regard to the other negative factors involved in the in- situ mining process, the County Commissioners being responsible for the public health policies of Weld County, should be seen attending public meetings that address problems and health risks that would result. A / 4-4,71",v; 5z-paA/S o4- /9i -o7 Therefore, attending informative meetings pertaining to issues that threaten the health of the public and the well being of any and/or every water bearing formation that supplies water to the public in your county, would indeed fall into the very same category of"responsible" duty on the behalf of the members of the Weld County Board of Commissioners. David Long, District 1 has been assigned directly under your jurisdiction regarding your role in the board of Weld County Commissioners. The lack of attendance by not even one member of the board at the public meeting held on August 22nd, has been seen as a missed opportunity on the County Commissioners behalf by concerned citizens who not only attended, but by those who are watching in the background. Now is the time to be seen and to show concern regarding these issues that stand before you, that undoubtedly will shape the future of not only Weld County, but the State of Colorado as well. Be therefore encouraged not to send a similar message of apathy to the public regarding upcoming future opportunities, rather, become involved and be seen as being informed, not only to the pertinent subjects relating to the well being of the underground reserves of water in your county, at such public gatherings, but also, just for the reason of respect for the general public that elected you into your job. Sincer y, acit. not '" nt Wel County, CO P.J. POPPE 22620 WCR 64 GREELEY, CO 80631 PROTECT NORTHERN COLORADO S,, r FROM URANIUM MINING r WELD COUNTY COULD BE COLORADO'S GATEWAY TO URANIUM MINING • Overseas demand is driving the price for uranium to record highs. • Low-grade uranium exist,g, vast areas of Colorado and when left un ; • rbed poses no danger. ire INING WILL BE IN YOUR • • Powertech Ur as obtained mineral rights to 6,0, - ' Colorado to mine ur, •, ellington,11 miles of Fort C= ` reeley. • Open p hem portion of the mi Col& S , it r•L" ♦ In- uranium is im, -A ns. N DANCE ' , ♦ f as a bee • mine ° ceasit • Paa., d with N r -s E :,�{ a s into ,< , r= .. ... -from its sandstone layer then the resulting uraniu c # 3r, '-n with heavy metals,is pumped to the surface. • Powertech's mining will take place within and using water from the Laramie-Fox Hills aquifer. This aquifer covers most of the Denver Basin area,a% ;:d imately 7 1'.:';a quare miles along the Front Range from Wyoming to Colorado Springs and eas I.municipal,agricultural and residential wells use the Laramie-Fox Hills aquifer e, • `;2001,prior to northern Colorado's population explosion,33,700 recorded wells ; , „, E THE NVI ' ' 1 • * � KS ARE HIGH ,k�: • Spills,leaks,mechanical f ,1 r' ` all types of uranium mining. I'd 4" i*"'xrtj xr ke tY I. •A trail of hazardous m„ s mining of radioactive uranium through to opium contained in the spent fuel of nuclear power plant . • Uranium mining will pollute r ,, ans livestock, wildlife Y m and crops to radiation and heat/ % `L'1 ' `**' '`t�; ?i ure*� STOP THE URANIUM RUSH TO COLORADO FORT COLLINS TOWN MEETING TUESDAY SEPTEMBER 25TH 7:00 PM TO 9:00 PM CANYON WEST ROOM AT THE LINCOLN CENTER 417 WEST MAGNOLIA STREET, FORT COLLINS CO 80521 For more information go to www.nunnglow.com Coloradoans Against Resource Destruction P.O.Box 271,Nunn, Colorado 80648 '2 August 29, 2007 Weld County Commisioner David Long 905 10th Street Greeley CO 80631 Commisioner Long, I am writing you this letter as a concerned citizen of Weld County. You as our elected officicals need to be aware of the health and safety issues facing Weld County residents, that is being proposed by a uranium mining company named Powertech out of Canada. The proposed methods of mining are unclean, unsafe and unwanted. Please adopt resolutions that will prevent uranium mining in Weld County and surrounding counties, even the entire state of Colorado! A meeting was held in Ault, CO on August 22, 2007 of which I attended. There were no elected County Commissioners in attendance. Therefore I am sending you a couple of flyers that were handed out by other concerned citizens of the county so that you may be aware of the seriousness of this project. One is a short history of the uranium industry and a few of it's problems, the second is a letter that was written by a concerned citizen who heard Governor Ritter speak the morning of August 22 on 7News and responded with the enclosed letter for all to sign and send to the Governor. 4Th you for your time, ®( /1�p Lan S. Poppe LANA POPPE A citizen of Weld County 22620 WCR 64 GREELEY, CO 80631 fi /may U7nwrt u.ni/G O it/S' 08-22-2007 To: Gov. Bill Ritter, Jr. 136 State Capitol Denver, CO 80203-1792 (303 866-2471 Fax (303) 866-2003 Gov. Ritter, Today you addressed a group of people and spoke of the necessity and importance of health care for kids. Your exact words were "...before it's chronic, or God forbid, before it's terminal...". Kids, as you well know, and as you have addressed, are Colorado's future. Insuring that their environment is healthy, is just as important as health care, if not even more so! Therefore, it is of utmost importance that you take steps now, to insure just that ! You are the Governor, you can do something about it, now is the time to act. A mining company by the name of Powertech Uranium Co., is seeking permission to extract naturally occurring uranium oxide, that is contained in very minute, extremely low concentration levels, as it is found in the Laramie/Fox Hills water bearing sedimentary rock aquifer. Disturbing this sedimentary rock water bearing aquifer, that provides tens of thousands of people drinking water, and of those - "kids" - included, via an in situ mining process, that is to say; by pumping chemically laden fluids into that aquifer, and thereby releasing other more concentrated unwanted existing minerals, including selenium, arsenic, radium, etc. to name a few, that may not be extracted along with the desired low concentrations of uranium oxide, is reckless to say the least! Bill Ritter, as the elected Governor of the State of Colorado, it is your duty and responsibility to further insure the health of kids, not only by the measures of health care that you have spoken of today, but by also insuring the safety of the water from which they drink, regardless of the source! An ounce of prevention is worth more than a thousand pounds of cure! Put an end to the proposed in situ mining process by Powertech Uranium Co., not only at the proposed Centennial site, but in all other water bearing areas of the State of Colorado as well ! The Laramie/Fox Hills water bearing formation, is part of the Denver basin sedimentary rock aquifer complex, and as the Colorado Ground Water Association has clearly written - "the City of Denver, for example, would not be what it is today without the presence of the Denver basin aquifers beneath it." As you yourself have clearly stated - "...before it's chronic, or God forbid, before it's terminal." Sincerely, A citizen of the great State of Colorado A SHORT HISTORY OF THE URANIUM WIDUS'f'RY- AND A FEW OF ITS PROBLEMS Uranium was first used as the"mother element for the atomic bomb. In the 1950s and 1960s,tthe nuclear power industry ryas developed. Uranium miningtook place across the West After the Three Mile Island accident in 1979 and the end of the arms race with the Soviet Union,the price of uranium dropped. Uranium miring shut down, and no nuclear power plants were started. The Chemobyl power plant disaster in 1986 sealed the nuclear power industry's tale—the technology was simply judged to be too expensive and too dangerous. Uranium miring has become"hot again in the last few years with talk ahcvit re-starling the nuclear power industry. Prospecting is going on across the West, and mining has restarted in a few locations. Most proposed new mines use"in situ leaching'technology,which involves using an alkaline sotr,n to remove uranium from underground deposits,then pumping it b the surface This fad sheet includes just a few of the problems that have resulted from the uranium industry. It does not pretend to cover the thousands of Incidents'associated with riuclear power plants each year. It does not include the pollution and health problems associated with the enrichment of uranium b prepare it for nuclear power plants. Mining As the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission noted in a report issued in early 2007,"Atftough these In- situ'leach mining techniques are considered more environmentally benign then traditional miring and milling practices they still tend to contaminate the groundwater: Uranium companies have been known to start mining before getting the rosary perms. Hazardous wastes from decades-old uranium mines have entered the water, air, and soil in northwest South Dakota. In Texas and Wyoming,in situ projects contaminated the groundwater. State officials obliged by lowering the water quality standards,so the mining codes could say they didn't do anything'wrong.' Uranium mining in the 1950s—1970s caused widespread water contamination in the Southwestern U.S. Transportation Trucks carrying uranium are just as likely to have accidents as anyone else. In a rural area near Bowdon, N.D., a truck carrying enriched uranium hit a train. The driver was apparently taking back roads to avoid regulation. The driver was killed,and the truck wasn't marked as having radioactive cargo. 45 people— most of them first responders—were exposed before anyone knew they were dealing with radioactive materials. During the first 25 years of the nuclear industry,there were over 200 reported accidents involving nuclear materials. Milling While Powertech says it does not plan to build a uranium mill in our area,there will be retention ponds and radioactive materials on the surface of the ground. So the conditions will be similar as for the situations listed here under"Milling: Uranium mill wastes in the Southwest seriously contaminated drinking water for 50 miles downstream. Plants there were 100 to 100,000 times as radioactive as the water. (Plants concentrate radiation) A retention pond burst in South Dakota in 1962, sending 200 tons of radioactive solids down the Cheyenne River. . On Utah's Green River, a flash flood washed 14,000 tons of tailings downstream. In 1979,a dam in New Mexico broke,and 100 million gallons of radioactive water rushed down a streambed_ Officials estimated that 90 miles of the stream were heavily contaminated. People lost their water supply and were advised not to eat or sell their ivesthek The darn break was the sixth in 20 years. In 1977, a pipeline failure at a New Mexico facility resulted in the spill of 50,000 tons of solids and 2,200,000 gallons of liquids. Taxpayers Tahipayers have footed the bill for the nuclear industry's problems. We paid for the creation of the nuclear industry from the start When uranium companies lett radioactive milt tailings at 22 sites across the West in the 1950x-1970s, taxpayers paid to clean them up. We are still paying for the heath costs for thousands of uranium miners and other nuclear workers who got sick due to exposure to radiation. When a million cubic feet of garbage began to leak from a nuclear repeocessing plant in Buffalo,NY,the company had gone bankrupt Taxpayers p $2 Mon to dean up the mast In case of a nuclear power-related accident,nuclear companies pay a limited portion of the costs of the accident They pay no more than$10 billion—the Chernobyl accident cost just Russia, Ukraine, and Belarus$358 btlion By federal law(the Price-Anderson Ad),we pay the rest Taxpayers have footed the bill for the now 65-year-old search for some way to dispose of nuclear waste— there is sill no permanent disposal fadity for materials that must be aimpletely isolated from oxygen and the environment for tens of thousands of years. For more information or to get involved to help stop uranium mining in northern Colorado, see www.nunnglow.com or call Jay and Robin Davis at 481-6539 or Daryl and Cynthia Burkhardt at 223-1045. For the sources of this information,contact Lilies Jarding, Ph.D., at Iiliasj@hotmail.00m. Hello