The URL can be used to link to this page

Browse Search

Home My WebLink About20072014.tiff ER ( - GUARD • z.1,--- ,-.179 ZF, !�FR'SN ` max.,._ -....«..... V " 1 y�am 'Y..IF "c1 7:.: p ITS 6��i. (F5:a`�9SY 1 Y;1 i191iC._` MV32�' • 1 INrls.,... a ' �.c�rns • eras. e r rr4 ^ ..x n .� ,, r "fir : " • ' ix R14^ _ b � . .. ifr_._. Pi . ro --- .� E i . itili-Ero-Guard West, Inc Denver. Colorado: 2007 Brian Dingels. Quontin McMillan & Don Nelson Your Leader In Erosion Control Blankets EXHIBIT 2007-2014 (Sr: I 1. I � 1 J M N n n op 'fa coti0 Ci • J C) i�A.O a' �l Si 9 O on D CI 4 = N S ' J W .] U _iix la o O 3 a c.) F, O J 7 M.. 4 (.) m o a 7 it. ? .r c ,.., .,..., c m,„,,,,,, L.,.. <v ri vn<D r--<� 4E i 3 . ,...., •cn l:CD 0 W "Ti i0 0 OO Dr I - LE 4., •, , 4_,; t;: LI.I r l . i FR ( - GUARD a a x�Y K v. fie,=.. S. is di 0 •d C an W xM b , w. t os^' ♦ r.- Xs`14 �i,p ..Ar y ' / l i lest ��►. i SO 4 '.' t v d YON likaditP 111 Coaktal Ittankti* ER ( 1 - GUARD , ,_ .„..., - ii: ms's ,4' k f 1 ' t Axid - fi. a as � s .2. �� .�J� " . is (� � I- I. C y 4 tom. r Yoko.Lewitt In Eros n Control Rla**its ERA - GUAR D of as, �e s titPy za <� Vaal/ rtstwal .. ` {PY xcM SaSF AI;� a5 b33b°r9'3F xA."eF to XV 111111111111F 61 � Y Ytattir litaklet in Erosion Control Rlaattt`ts ERL) - DUARD •,, Y��tt _ � 1TJSya� ter:' %3,3`ac A w . t • _. .O >r - .} 1 1 C jm .v l£• , c P r r Tit 4.i y� \ ie y�q • Your LCAKitt Irk Erasion Control Ittartkets el 1 i k 1 ig ; /,, / `4 3 I I IIf' l; I r it ��. , mq hi 17 II zi iiti g� V lied I Y I i3 1 1 • / f e fi g fiit @ / iI AA ao AA AA AA g q a 2N la '• 9 `9 IdiA FA 1 Aa to RA .a..1 au AA lma4 X• 41 3 tN A Le o v � &. m&3 « lc' A) CANNA n oM a CO W In m W• AI CC , J m t `6 C1 oe A pp 0.221'6 7C •' i 9 h ...... Mtx$ p 4 >dW 5 m 1-4 I + x i 1110 MJi-.4 0 esn eus arouem e<A-aes on Rot • MEMORANDUM BBA water consultants BISHOP-BAOGDEN ASSOCIATES, INC. To: Jay Pansing and Roy Enter From: Amanda Peirce and Chris Sanchez Subject: Projections of Water Requirements for Two Development Scenarios and Water Supply Availability in Accordance with Weld County 300-Year Rule Job: 0533.00 Date: March 14, 2006 As requested by Mr. Jay Pansing, we have updated our ground water availability estimates based on Weld County's 300-year rule, and completed an estimate of the water requirements for two development scenarios in order to determine water supply adequacy based on the 300-year rule. Our ground water quantification based on a 100-year aquifer life was presented in a previous memo dated December 20, 2005, although it should be noted that the values presented below are based on an updated property area of 138 acres. The updated ground water quantification based on a 300-year aquifer life is presented in Table 1. Table 1 ANNUAL APPROPRIATION FOR A 138 ACRE TRACT PER WELD COUNTY 300-YEAR RULE: SEC. TWP RNG ACRES ,••••••• 28 02N 64 138 NONTRIBUTARY NOT NONTRIBUTARY TOTAL AVERAGE ANNUAL AVERAGE ANNUAL ANNUAL AQUIFER ACRES SAT. APPROP ACRES SAT. APPROP APPROP UPPER DAWSON LOWER DAWSON DENVER UPPER ARAPAHOE LOWER ARAPAHOE 138 .0 85.2 6.7 6.7 LARAMIE-FOX HILLS 138 .0 158.4 10.9 10. 9 Note: These quantities are based on a 300-year aquifer life per Weld County Amend Section 27-2-170, Public Water Provisions). The actual economic life of the aquifer may be less than 300 years. Actual ground water availability will not be known until wells are drilled,constructed,and tested on the property. As stated above, two development scenarios were considered. Scenario 1 represents the water requirements for 9 single-family residential lots and 4 industrial lots. Scenario 2 represents the water requirements for 13 single-family residential lots and no industrial lots. As presented below, the projected water requirements for each scenario does not exceed the available nontributary ground water entitlement of 10.9 acre-feet per year(Table 1). EXHIBIT S '— , 5 1 www.bbawarer.00m. ;13 b.t'.r Hampden Acrow. it it 1050 E n, nood,Cniorulo 80'l0 phone 303$06-8952 :IN 30;.306.9951 Page 2 March 14,2006 For both scenarios water use rates for industrial uses and outside irrigation were taken from the Douglas County Zoning Resolution Section 18A, Water Supply—Overly District which assumes 0.1 gallons per square foot per day for industrial uses and 2.5 acre-feet/acre for irrigation uses. In-house residential demands were based on 3.5 people per household and 80 gallons per day per person. Scenario 1 which is outlined in Table 2 includes nine residential lots with 6,000 square feet per lot of irrigation and 4 industrial use lots with 1,000 square feet of irrigation per lot. Scenario 2 includes 13 residential lots and no industrial lots. For Scenario 2, the available ground water supplies can support up to 9,000 square feet of irrigation per lot. Because of the uncertain water uses associated with the industrial lots, and because the development will rely on non-renewable water supplies, we recommend including provisions to minimize outdoor irrigation. Although the annual nontributary entitlement is sufficient to support large irrigated areas, we recommend a development plan with smaller lawn sizes. Note that only 98 percent of the nontributary water is consumable in accordance with Senate Bill 5, but as presented in Table 2, more than 40 percent of the water pumped from the nontributary Laramie-Fox Hills aquifer will be return flow, which is more than adequate to provide sufficient relinquishment to the stream system. . _., ivwiw_b1 rwater:coal aish p > ≥du, 1 w&.Lit III(_ Table 2 Determination of Water Demands and Consumptive Use Enter Property 9 Residential Lots and 4 Industrial Use Lots • Indoor Residential Irrigation 9 Single-Family Residential Lots 6.000 ft'-tLot 3.5 Persons per unit 54,000 ft: 80 gal/person/day 1.24 ac 2.00 ac-ftfac 4 Industrial Use Lots 80% %efficiency 10,000 Square-feet of building space/Lot 3.10 ac-ft 0.1 gal/sgft/day Industrial Irrigation 1,000 ftyLot 4,000 ft' 0.09 ac 2.00 ac-ft/ac 80% %efficiency 0.23 ac-ft Indoor Outside Irrigation Total Residential Industrial Residential Industrial Month Demand Demand CU Demand Demand CU Demand CU (at) (at) (af) (at) (at) (at) (at) (at) [I] [2] [31 [4] [51 [6] [7] [8] ..*--- Jan 0.24 0.38 0.06 0.62 0.06 Feb 0.22 0.34 0.06 0.56 0.06 Mar 0.24 0.38 0.06 0.62 0.06 Apr 0.23 0.37 0.06 0,60 0.06 May 0.24 0.38 0.06 0.23 0.02 0.20 0.87 0.26 Jun 0.23 0.37 0.06 1.05 0.08 0.90 1.73 0.96 Jul 0.24 0.38 0.06 0.98 0.07 0.84 1.67 0.90 ' Aug 0.24 0.38 0.06 0.55 0.04 0.47 1.21 0.54 Sep 0.23 0.37 0.06 0.29 0.02 0.25 0.92 0.31 Oct. 0.24 0.38 0.06 0.62 0.06 Nov 0.23 0.37 0.06 0.60 0.06 Dec 0.24 0.38 0.06 0.62 0.06 _ Total 2.82 4.48 0.28 3.10 0.23 2.66 10.63 3.39 Notes'. (I)Residential demands based on I 00%occupancy,9 units,3.5 persons per unit,80 gallons per person per day. (2)Industrial demands based on 100%occupancy,4 lots,6000 sgft of building space per lot,0.1 gallons per sgft per day. (3)Total Indoor Consumptive Use based on 10%CU,((I)+(23)*0.1 (4) Residential liTigation demand,2.5 acre-feet/acre,distributed over May-September (5) Industrial Irrigation demand.2.5 acre-feet/acre,distributed over May-September (6) Total Irrigation Consumptive Use,based on 80%CU (7) Total demand,equal to[1]+[2]+[4]+[5] (6) Total CU,equal to[3]+[6] *Water use rates from the Douglas County Zoning Resolution Section 18A,Water Supply-Overlay District H v1533 En .Enia'newbrm mvc p oni Scnia .^davene,5cen sI Bishop-Booem.nemosn,Inc. 911.2 AM 3/,413505 40 • Table 3 Determination of Water Demands and Consumptive Use Enter Property 13 Residential Lots and No Industrial Use Lots • • Indoor Residential Irrigation 13 Single-Family Residential Lots 9,000 (&Lot 3.5 Persons per unit 117,000 R° 80 gal/person/day 2.69 ac 2.00 ac-ft/ac 0 Industrial Use Lots 80% %efficiency 6.000 Square-feet of building space/Lot 6.71 ac-ft 0.1 gal/sgft/day Industrial Irrigation 0 ft22'Lot 0 112 0.00 ac 2 ac-ft/ac 80% %efficiency 0.00 ac-ft Indoor Outside Irrigation Total Residential Industrial Residential Industrial Month Demand Demand CU Demand Demand CU Demand CU (at) (at) (af) (at) (at) (at) (at) (at) Ill [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] ,/" Jan 0.35 0.00 0.03 0.35 0.03 Feb 0.31 0.00 0.03 0.3I 0.03 Mar 0.35 0.00 0.03 0.35 0.03 Apr 0.34 0.00 0.03 0.34 0.03 May 0.35 0.00 0.03 0.50 0.00 0.40 0.34 0.43 Jun 0.34 0.00 0.03 2.27 0.00 1.82 2.60 1.85 Jul 0.35 0.00 0.03 2.12 0.00 1.69 2.46 1.73 Aug 0.35 0.00 0.03 1.20 0.00 0.96 1.54 0.99 Sep 0.34 0.00 0.03 0.64 0.00 0.51 0.97 0.54 Oct 0.35 0.00 0.03 0.35 0.03 Nov 0.34 0.00 0.03 0.34 0.03 Dec 0.35 0.00 0.03 0.35 0.03 Total 4.08 0.00 0.41 6.71 0.00 5.37 10.79 5.78 Notes: (I)Residential demands based on 100%occupancy, 13 un'ts,3.5 persons per unit,80 gallons per person per day. (2)Industrial demands based on 100%occupancy,0 lots,6000 sgft of building space per lot,0.1 gallons per sgtt per day. (3)Total Indoor Consumptive Use based on 10%CU,((I)+(2))*0.1 (4) Residential In-igation demand,2.5 acre-feet/acre,distributed over May-September (5) Industrial Irrigation demand,2.5 acre-feet/acre,distributed over May-September (6) Total Irrigation Consumptive Use,based on 80%CU (7) Total demand,equal to[l]+[2]+[4]+[5] (6) Total CU,equal to[3]+[6] *Water use races flour the Douglas County Zoning Resolution Section I8A,Water Supply-Overlay District '0533-Enur V. i,ot t*L 'Da*nm,*.*acm�ee 315 vv*anri Sunam2 &airy-BigCan.Pam*ISn.1, . 903 NA 2043X0* NP • COLORADO DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES Office Use Only Form GWS-45(06/2006) DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES 1313 SHERMAN ST,RM 818,DENVER, CO 80203 phone—info: (303)866-3587 main:(303)866-3581 fax:(303)866-3589 HECEIVED http:/Mmw.water.state.co.us GENERAL PURPOSE JUN 13 2007 Water Well Permit Application Review instructions on reverse side prior to completing form. STATE ENGNEER CD(The form must be completed In black or blue Ink or typed. D'1. Applicant Information 6. Use Of Well (check applicable boxes) Name of applicant Attach a detailed description of uses applied for. Horton Farms I LLC; Horton Farms II LLC; Three H-K LLC do Bishop-Brogden Associates, Inc 9 Industrial 9 Other(describe):Domestic, Fire Protection, ❑Municipal Augmentation, Exchange, and all other Mailing ad ho 333 West Hampden Avenue, Suite 1050 ®Irrigation beneficial uses. • --City State Zip code 9 Commercial ' Englewood CO 80110 7.Well Data(proposed) Telephone ft E-mail(Optional) — ----_--- Maximum pumping rats Annual amount to be withdrawn 303)806-8952 csanchez@bbawater.com gpm 2.Type Of Application(check applicable boxes) 15 32.8 acre-feet Total depth Aquifer 0 Construct new well 0 Use existing well 964 Laramie-Fox Hills O Replace existing well O Change or increase use feet O Change source(aquifer) O Reapplication(expired permit) 8. Land On Which Ground Water Will Be Used O Other: Legal Description(may be provided as an attachment): See attached map and 3. Refer To (if applicable) legal descriptions Well permit s Water Court case a _ N/A N/A Designated Basin Determination a Well name or a N/A Lot 3 Well 4. Location Of Proposed Well (II used for crop irrigation,attach a scaled map that shows irrigated area.) County - _ Weld NE 1/4 of the SW 1/4 A. SAcres B. Owner N/A N/A Section Township NorS Range EorW Pnndpal Meriden -- 28 2 9 0 64 O® 6th C. List any other wells orwater rights used on this land N/A Distance of well from section lines(section lines are typically not property lines) 2356 Ft.from❑NOS 1689 FL from❑ E®W 9.Proposed Well Driller License#(optional):Licensed For replacemem wellsonly—distance and direction from old well to new well 10.Signature Of Applicant(s)Or Authorized Agent N/A feet N/A direction The making of false statements hereinconstitutes perjury in the second Well location address(Include City.State.Zip) O them dwell address i5 same as in ten 1. degree,which is punishable as a class 1 misdemeanor pursuant to C.R.S. N/A 24-4-104(13)(a). I have read the statements herein,know the contents thereof and state that they are true to my knowledge. ________ -_-____—____ Sp (Noel orgYel s bus) Optional: GPS well location information in UTM format You must check GPS unit for required settings as follows: • _6_7c'7 Fennel must be UTM Print rams 8 title ❑2ana 12 or CI Zoo/3 Psi tyefNe.r 1- Se/tdaa2- - 6.4•ce- g3aJBc,., Assoc-. Swc. Fasting W44-er to cMiCe (omets. 144.1 { -4:t Af r/tc8N4., Units must be Meters Datum must be NADU Northing Office Use Only USGS map name DWR no. Unit must be sat to trw north map � Surface slew. Was GPS unit thecae fa above? O YES Remember to set Datum to NAD83 5. Parcel On Which Well Will Be Located Receipt area only ___ __JPLEASE ATTACH A CURRENT DEED FOR THE SUBJECT PARCEL) A. Legal Description(may be provided as an attachment): See attached legal descriptions Trans Number:3617693 6/13/2007 1:5537 PM Mika Corrigan(15) Total Trans And:$100.00 CHECK Check Number. 23087 Chock Amount $100.00 8. S of acres in parcel C. Owner WE 138 Three H-K LLC WR • D. NAZI this be the any well on tie parcel?OYES ®NO(if no—Mil other wells) CWCB Other wells may be pursued in the future •TOPO E. State Parcel los(optional): MYLAR • 5B5 DIV_ WD EXy1BR I „ Q I. �� :› �' w a � i LL 4O ry �,. - - 0 s U I `! tla I ,/ ss tla �`� 4P. $ �I j 3 II , r 11 i I ;I �f . ,• �i ��• 00 II II 1- 8 S/1 /i Ca ii © i i �, 1.14 o 1 __ ___ _ ? i •.y • � �f , I I .o T'y i I u c p / I � I \ ..�/ Z I, `r \! t rS ' I'5.. E �. 1 u Q i N . II P i Hello