HomeMy WebLinkAbout20073400 RESOLUTION
RE: APPROVE SECOND SEMI-ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT FOR THE BUILDING
HEALTHY MARRIAGES PROJECT AND AUTHORIZE CHAIR TO SIGN
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, pursuant to
Colorado statute and the Weld County Home Rule Charter, is vested with the authority of
administering the affairs of Weld County, Colorado, and
WHEREAS, the Board has been presented with a Second Semi-Annual Progress Report
for the Building Healthy Marriages Project from the County of Weld, State of Colorado, by and
through the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County,on behalf of the Department of Social
Services, to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and
Families, for a period commencing April 1, 2007, and ending September 29, 2007, with further
terms and conditions being as stated in said report, and
WHEREAS, after review, the Board deems it advisable to approve said report, a copy of
which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Weld
County, Colorado, ex-officio Board of Social Services, that the Second Semi-Annual Progress
Report for the Building Healthy Marriages Project from the County of Weld, State of Colorado, by
and through the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, on behalf of the Department of
Social Services,to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services,Administration for Children
and Families be, and hereby is, approved.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Board that the Chair be, and hereby is, authorized to
sign said report.
The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by
the following vote on the 31st day of October, A.D., 2007, nunc pro tunc April 1, 2007.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
, ' WEI COUNTY, COLO_ DO
ATTEST: r \. :
avid E. Long, Chair
Weld County Clerk to the - a
�� tiet61 William H. e; Pro-Tem
BY:
Dep Clerk the Board
/
Willi mF. Garcia
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Robert D. Masden
1115. -Co my A rney ilutgli7"::tevAr
Rademach r
Date of signature: Ir7
2007-3400
SS0034
(' f , SSC( o 5 //-a/ —o7
a
(iVis; DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES
P.O. BOX A
igiipe
GREELEY, CO. 80632
Website:www.co.weld.co.us
Administration and Public Assistance(970)352-1551
Fax Number(970)353-5215
COLORADO
Memorandum
TO: David E. Long, Chair Date: October 29, 2007
Board of County Commissioners
FR: Judy A. Griego, Director, Social Services % t/��} �7
RE: Building Healthy Marriages Project Semi=Annual Progress Report
2 for the OFA Healthy Marriage Demonstration Program.
Enclosed for Board approval is the Building Healthy Marriages Project Semi-Annual Progress
Repot#2.
The major provisions of the report are as follows:
1. The report encompasses activities that have occurred from October 1, 2006 through to
September 30, 2007
2. All of the allowable activities have been initiated and are receiving clientele for service.
Policies for issues of domestic violence, faith-based regulations, and voluntary
participation have been developed and initiated. Of the service unit goals 5 out of 9 were
met and exceeded, giving a total of 332 service units. Baseline infonnation for program
evaluation has been collected and analyzed supporting the need for such a program in
Weld County. Implementation issues have been identified with relevant plan of actions
to improve the programmatic issues.
3. The cost of the Building Healthy Marriage Project is as follows:
Federal Grant: $855,138.28*
TANF MOE Reduction Reserve: $102,702.00
TANF Community Investment: $ 60,866.26
If you have any questions, please contact me.
2007-3400
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
ADMINISTRATION FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES
Semi-Annual Progress Report-Cover Sheet
*This cover sheet must accompany all reports submitted*
Grant Number: 90FE0134
Budget Period 09/30/2006 to 09/29/2007 Project Period 09/30/2006 to 09/29/2011
Grantee Name and Address: David Long, Weld County Commissioner, Weld County
Dep ent of Social Services, 315B North 11th Ave, Greeley, CO 80631
cv3. OCT 31 2007
David Long, Chair Date
Telephone Number: (970) 352-1551
Project Title: Healthy Marriage Demonstration, Priority Area 2
Period Covered by Report: April 1, 2007 thru September 29, 2007
(Check One)
First Semi-Annual Progress Report
Second Semi-Annual Progress Report X Final Report
Name and Phone Number of Project Director: Paule S Brown (970) 352-1551 ext
6552
Author's Name and Telephone Number: Ann Bruce (970) 352-1551 ext.6225
Date of Report: _October 30, 2007
Report Number: (Number sequentially beginning with 1) 2
Name of Federal Project Officer: Ms. Michele Walters
Comments, (if any):
If you have any questions, please contact me: Ann Bruce, Building Healthy Marriages
Program Manager(970) 352-1551 ext 6225
was2-.3YolJ
Suggested Semi-annual Report Format
OFA Healthy Marriage Demonstration Program
I. Grant Information—Provide the following information:
• Weld County Department of Social Services, 90FE0134
• Government entity
• Priority Area — 2
• The target population includes engaged and married couples whose incomes are
below 200% of the poverty level residing in Weld County. There is a focus on
reaching couples in the northern and southern parts of Weld County. Provisions
have been made to meet the needs of our Latino population as well.
II. Major Activities and Accomplishments—Provide a summary of your major activities
during this reporting period, including those activities that were not completed in the
first reporting period, in relation to the projected accomplishments outlined in your
project application or subsequently approved revisions providing the following
information:
From October 2006 through September 2007, efforts began and grew in outreaching to
the Weld County community, including the faith-based community to spread the
Healthy Marriages message. Community partners met on a monthly basis and the
Community Mediation Project provided BHM marriage education classes in a variety of
venues, utilizing BHM trainees. The project secured interview spots on local radio
stations and in the newspaper. Project marketing outreach efforts included Head Start,
Social Services, Sertoma, Kiwanis, State Farm, Hispanic Women's Group, Catholic
Charities, Migrant Council, Chambers of Commerce, Department of Public Health,
Sunrise Health Clinic, Weld County Children's Festival, Fort Lupton Trapper Days and
numerous local churches. BHM staff manned an information booth for the Cinco de
Mayo celebration on May 5, 2007 as well as at the local Children's Festival,
Department of Social Services lobby, Employment Services lobby, town celebrations,
community fun fests, church community outreach events, and the University of
Northern Colorado Fall Bizarre. Flyers and welcome letters were sent to Weld County
couples who applied for marriage licenses to invite them to participate through
premarital inventory opportunities. Billboards and bus benches were designed to be
multi-cultural and in both Spanish and English. They were put up throughout the
county. In July the Project received Federal approval to add the position of Hispanic
Outreach Coordinator to assist in recruitment within the Latino Community. This
individual was hired and Hispanic participants made up the second largest ethnic
group. The Hispanic Healthy Marriage Initiative held a forum in September in which
BHM staff members spoke on the panel about recruiting Hispanic couple to a marriage
project. The Project hosted two kick off events in the fall, one in Greeley and one in
Fort Lupton, as well as a Labor Day 1st Annual BHM Fun Run, attended by a record
number of 350 people, and two Marriage Symposiums, one in Greeley and one in Fort
Lupton. BHM also co-hosted an informational gala in which Building Healthy Marriages
was highlighted and Dr. L. Parrot was the keynote speaker. This event was attended
by 156 community, faith-based, and state leaders where discussion for strategies to
sustain the Project was initiated. The Project Website was completed, flyers and
10/29/2007
posters were printed and distributed and information kiosks were developed. Another
technological activity includes all the partners of BHM continuing to work together with
the Tapestry system to ensure coordinated and thorough data collection and tracking.
The multi-partner contract with Tapestry is moving forward to the final stage of
development. Training for those directly involved with providing services included
cultural competency, domestic violence awareness, substance abuse awareness,
working with Faith-Based community, setting boundaries and assessment /family
advocacy training was completed. The Project's continues to be evaluated via program
satisfaction surveys, marital satisfaction inventory pre-test and more definitively through
the post—test to be given on the anniversary of the couples joining the Building
Healthy Marriages. The first post-tests are scheduled to be administered in January of
2008. Finally, goals were set and exceeded in the following areas: Assessments,
Marriage Seminars, Conflict Resolution class, Financial Management, and Marriage
Enrichment weekends.
• Allowable Activity Area(s) — Identify the allowable activity area as stated within
your approved grant application.
• Schedule of Accomplishments - List accomplishments in chronological order and
provide target dates, where available, from your project proposal.
• Projected Accomplishments — Provide quantitative projections of the
accomplishments to be achieved, the projected number to be achieved during this
budget year (i.e. FY 2007) and the number achieved to date. Include a short
description of what is being counted.
Allowable Activity/ Schedule of Projected Accomplishments
Activity Accomplishment for Accomplishments for FY 07 for FY 07
Area(s)' FY 07 Proposed Date of Target' #during #to date
completion completion/ this completed
date status reporting 3
period
served2
1(Public Presentations for October— February—
Advertising) recruitment were September September
made to the Greeley,
Platteville, Evans and
Carbon Valley
Chambers of
Commerce, Latina
Women's Group,
Catholic Charities,
Promises for Children
Coordinating Council,
UW of Weld County,
DSS Case Managers,
Weld Chapter of
Colorado Children's
Association,
CSU-TRiO program,
Kenton Manor, Salud
Clinic,Weld County
Health Department,
Transitional House, A
10/29/2007
Woman's Place,
Room at the Inn.
1(Public BHM staff provided October— February--
Advertising) information to citizens September September
for the purpose of
recruitment at the
following events:
Twombly Elementary
Parents Fair, Kiwanis
of the Rockies, Union
Colony Kiwanis,
KFKA Radio, KGRE
Radio, Balsam Park,
School District 6
Literacy Fair, DSS
Lobby event, Cinco
de Mayo, Kersey
Community
Celebration,Windsor
Days, Ft. Lupton DSS
Facility Opening,
Church of God of
Prophecy
Neighborhood Day,
UNC Fall Bizarre, Ft.
Lupton Trapper Days
Bittersweet Park,
Greeley Fun Fests,
Greeley Tribune,
Northern Colorado
Women's Magazine
1(Public BHM Web Site was April May
Advertising) developed
1(Public Informational April May 5
Advertising) brochures were
developed and
distributed in both
Spanish and English
1(Public Advertising spots May-Kick Off May
Advertising) were placed on the July-Kick Off July
radio and in July-Fun Run August
newspapers July- September
Symposiums
1(Public Advertising spots May-Kick Off May
Advertising) were placed on the July-Kick Off July
radio and in July-Fun Run August
newspapers July- September
Symposiums
1(Public Kick Off events were North —May North—May
Advertising) held in North and South—July South—July
South Weld County
1(Public Healthy Marriage May May
Advertising) Month was declared
by the City of Greeley
and Weld County
1(Public Letters of invitation May May/June
Advertising) were sent to marriage
license applicants
10/29/2007
sent to marriage
license applicants
1(Public Billboard and bus June June
Advertising) bench advertising
was completed in
both Spanish and
English
1(Public Posters were June July 9
Advertising) developed and
distributed in both
Spanish and English
1(Public Informational Kiosks August September
Advertising) were developed
1(Public Family Fun Run was September September 3
Advertising) held 22
1 (Public Symposiums in North September September
Advertising) and South County 20 20
September September
27 27
1 (Public Informational Gala to September September
Advertising) discuss the 25
sustainability of BHM
with Dr. L. Parrot as
the keynote speaker
1(Public Advertising was
Advertising) restricted to event-
specific promotions
and educational
announcements
3(Marriage Needs and Eligibility 125 131 131
education) Assessments
3(Marriage Marriage Seminars 40 51 51
education)
3(Marriage Conflict Resolution 40 51 + 15 51 + 15
education)
3(Marriage Financial 20 28 28
education) Management
3(Marriage Employment Training 50 7 7
education) Services
3(Marriage Health Insurance 5 9 9
education) Access
4 (Pre- Premarital 40 11 11
marital) Inventories
5(Marriage Marriage Enrichment 20 29 29
enhancement Weekends
5(Marriage Marriage Boosters 10 3 3
enhancement
7 (Marriage Marriage Mentoring 20 6 6
mentoring)
10/29/2007
Ill. Compliances and Assurances
Domestic Violence - A key aspect of successful marriage education program is the
safety of its participants. The creators of the Prevention and Relationship
Enhancement Program (PREP) curriculum emphasize that it is not designed as
treatment for domestic violence. To insure that individuals are not further victimized
through involvement or attempted involvement with this project, strategies include:
• intake meeting will include completion of a simply-written consent form that:
o emphasizes the voluntary nature of project activities
o is presented verbally and in writing
o is available in English and Spanish
• portions of the assessment is done individually, so that each person in a
relationship has the opportunity to express themselves without direct input from
the other person
• each assessment uses the same questions, so an abuser is not alerted by
variations
• domestic violence experts will be involved in design of assessment materials
• staff have received training on domestic abuse
• recruitment coordination partners have received similar information to assist
them in their roles
• marriage education curriculum covers appropriate personal boundaries
• Intake and assessment sites include handouts on domestic violence, which will
be displayed with other materials.
• Collaborative efforts have been initiated with Women's Place, an agency that
focuses on domestic violence issues.
• Focus by referral base agencies to expand and create DV programs.
• Weld County is assessing how all of its agencies are addressing and/or
expanding DV issues.
Faith Based Regulations —Training was presented on two separate occasions, about
conducting marriage education, creating and supporting healthy marriages, and
community services as per the Faith-Based Regulations. The first training was held in
March of 2007 and was attended by the lead agency and the partners. The second
training was held in July of this year to train the educational administration partners and
other faith-based and community organizations. To provide the base for these
services, faith-based and community organization leaders have become certified in the
secular version of PREP/ENRICH marriage education curriculum and participating
couples are given a choice between secular and non-secular classroom settings.
Partners also provide an atmosphere in which diverse individuals are comfortable
discussing issues related to marriage, and provide a variety of services, including
conflict resolution training, marriage seminars, marriage enrichment weekends,
financial and other training. Documentation of compliance is maintained with the Weld
County Department of Social Services with specific policies and procedures addressing
the Faith Based Regulations in the Building Healthy Marriages handbook.
10/29/2007
Voluntary Participation —The means that our program ensures that activities are
voluntary begin with our intake meeting that does include completion of a simply-written
consent form that:
o emphasizes the voluntary nature of project activities
o is presented verbally and in writing
o is available in English and Spanish
Also our program utilizes a large referral base that include United Way of Weld County,
Head Start programs, family practice clinics, the BOCES Migrant Program, Promises
for Children, the Right to Read program, faith-based organizations, and the Department
of Social Services. Couples may also be referred from within the Department when
they access Food Stamps, Medicaid, TANF, child support, or other services. The
emphasis on the project activities being voluntary is echoed throughout the literature
and verbal presentations given on behalf of Building Healthy Marriages.
IV. Data Collection - Provide numbers of participants served during the project period.
Numbers must reflect your total project numbers for each allowable activity area. For
those grantees serving Allowable Activity One, Public Advertising Campaigns, you
need not report units served.
Allowable Activity Unit Number of units per FY 07 Number of units since
Area Award date(Sept. 06)
Target #to Date #to Date completed
completed
Allowable Activity#3
Assessments Couples 125 Couples 131 Couples 131 Couples
Marriage Seminars Couples 40 Couples 51 Couples 51 Couples
Conflict Resolution Couples 40 Couples 51 + 15 51+15 Couples(51 within
Couples the context of the
Marriage Seminars; 15
received more intensive
services by request
Financial Management Couples 20 Couples 28 Couples 28 Couples
Employment Services Individuals 50 7 Individuals 7 individuals
Individuals
Allowable Activity#4
Premarital Inventories Couples 40 Couples 11 Couples 11 Couples
Allowable Activity#5
Marriage Enrichment Couples 20 Couples 29 Couples 29 Couples
Weekends
Marriage Boosters Couples 10 Couples 3 Couples 3 Couples
Allowable Activity#7
Marriage Mentoring Couples 20 Couples 6 Couples 6 Couples
10/29/2007
V. Evaluation—Provide information on general project evaluation activities as they relate to your
measurement outcomes.
The MSI-R was chosen as the evaluation instrument for measuring marital stability as it measures
the following:
• Affective • Family History of • Conflict Over
Communication Distress Childrearing
• Role Orientation • Time Together • Dissatisfaction Over Sex
• Problem-Solving • Dissatisfaction With • Global Distress
Communication Children
• Aggression • Disagreements About
Finances
Major reasons were that it is translated into Spanish, normed on different ethnic groups, reading
level appropriate to population (around 6-7th grade reading level is suggested) good psychometric
properties, and has very important subscales, some of which are of particular interest for this grant
(ie. Global Distress, Disagreements about Finances, and subscales addressing areas of conflict or
potential conflict, including Problem-Solving Communication, Aggression, and Conflict over
childrearing). It is widely used, but has not been used with PREP. However, it is one of the more
current tests, having been originally developed around 1985 and revised in mid-1990. Several
other BHM projects around the country are also using this inventory.
Significant MSI-R Statistics Table 2: MSI-R statistics
(151 Administration) Selected MSI-R Scales
• MSI-R scores above 84 indicate that from January through September 2007
the respondent's perspective problems exist MSI-R#1 Norm
in the couple's marriage. Global Distress
• Global distress is the best overall measure n(valid test responses) 120 -
of marital satisfaction. Respondents in this Mean 8.1 4.1
sample reflect global distress at about the Std. Deviation 5.5 5.2
80th percentile as compared to the norm. Percentile Rank 80`h -
42% of the valid responses scored above % perceiving a problem 42% -
the 84th percentile, indicating their problems
are significant to them. Affective Communication
• The Affective Communication Scale (AFC) n (valid test responses) 124 -
reflects the least degree of problems of the Mean 5.2 3.7
four scales and lowest percentile rank at the Std. Deviation 3.2h 3.3
th Percentile Rank 76 -
76 percentile of the normative sample.
-
Only 28% view affective communication as % perceiving a problem 28%
a significant problem in their relationship. Problem Solving Comm.
• The Problem Solving Communication Scale n (valid test responses) 116 -
(PSC) ranks in the 82nd percentile when Mean 11.1 6.6
compared to the normative sample, Std. Deviation 4.6 5.0
representing the greatest level of distress in Percentile Rank 82nd the scales. 47% of the respondents % perceiving a problem 47% -
indicated that there they are experiencing Financial Disagreement
problems in this area. n(valid test responses) 126 -
• The Financial Disagreement Scale (FIN) Mean 5.1 2.9
reflects the next highest amount of distress Std. Deviation 2.8 2.7
of these four scales at the 815t percentile. Percentile Rank 8l s` -
43% of the valid responses indicated a % perceiving a problem 43% -
problem with finances.
10/29/2007
• In summary, over 40% of the couples in the sample reported experiencing significant
relationship distress. Problem solving communication is the most significant concern,
followed by financial and affective communication problems.
VI. Stories of Impact—Provide any significant stories or insights during this reporting
period concerning the impact of your program to provide Healthy Marriage education
services.
Participants in the Project have consistently provided positive reports about the impact
the activities and service providers have made on their lives. On a satisfaction survey
administered at the end of Marriage Seminars, participants rated the Project on a 1-10
scale, with 10 being the highest rating. Thirty-five couples rated the activities at a 10; 4
at a 9; 3 rated the activities at an 8; 2 at a 7 and 1 at a 5.
Testimony from participants was positive. "I just want to say thank you! We have
learned so much and we are so much closer. Almost like when we were first married.
Our communication is much better. We are climbing out of our daily routine and realize
how important it is to have time together as a couple. Thank you so much and please
continue the work you are doing. You are truly saving marriages one at a time." PC —
wife. "I went in thinking I was going to do things because that's what my wife wanted
and the class really changed my whole life. I think couples as a whole can benefit from
learning how to talk to one another. I think that's why couples don't last is they don't
know haw to address each other's wants and needs." Husband.
Recruitment is the first part of a successful program. The Building Healthy Marriage
Project Coordinator began each recruitment session by emphasizing the importance of
the program to the children of the family. He indicates that not only do Mom and Dad
strengthen their relationship, but the kids begin to view the family differently making the
family unit much more successful. One father even stated how proud he was that his
children, especially his sons, were witness to his participation in this program. The
most significant finding with recruitment was the best practices to recruit the male
participants. The Marriage Project Coordinator brought to the position the unique
perspective of a male that when they enter programs such as this; they come thinking
that they will be blamed for any problems with the relationship. However, as the men
found that the program was not about therapy, blaming or embarrassing, but
discovering and building on strengths, they got excited. They got so excited that they
started inviting their friends, workmates, and family members. Word of mouth has
therefore become a major marketing and motivational factor for the men.
Once recruited, the next step in a successful project is retention and that was achieved
by building a sense of community in which couples feel that they are respected for who
they are and engaged as in an accepting, interactive learning environment. Quite often
the participants list the attention and support of the family advocates as well as the
actual curriculum contents as strengths of the program. An email recently received
from a participant stated "I just wanted to tell you how much my husband and I enjoyed
Session One of the seminar last night. Even after being married 25 years, we found
really good information in the materials and presentation." Another couple came to
10/29/2007
BHM married for 46 years, but has been separated for the past 6 months and seriously
talking about divorce. However, after completing the marriage education seminar and
weekend enrichment they commented on the fact that they were treated with such
respect honored for their experiences and were supported in their efforts to be a strong
couple again. Because of their experience with BHM they have decided to move back
and have started planning a second life together.
There has been an unexpected but positive outcome noted in year one. Due to the
improved communication skills learned at the Marriage Education Seminars, some of
the women have been able to express to their husbands how important going to college
was to them. At this point we have had several women enroll in the local community
college.
VII. Implementation Issues and Concerns — Describe any deviations from the original
project plan during this reporting period, including instances in which projected
activities or schedules were not accomplished as anticipated. Describe special
problems encountered or expected. Please use this section to advise the program
specialist or grants management specialist of any assistance your organization may
need.
The Project set a goal of 50 individuals attending Employment Services of Weld County
employability seminars. This six-week long seminar, however, attracted only a handful
of participants. Participants indicated that the extra time commitment was more than
they could take on. Furthermore, participants indicated that their need was for
immediate employment. BHM adjusted its goal for year two, and will continue to work
with Employment Services to develop a more condensed format for participants. Other
options under investigation are to expand employment services to include the local
secondary education institutes and contract with someone to meet the individual needs
of the participants searching for employment. Really look into employment services
and see what they have to offer.
In addition, it was difficult to interest couples in completing the Premarital Inventories.
After much discussion, it was decided to rename the activity"Relationship Inventory' in
the hope of generating more interest. The second year goal will remain the same.
Financial Management was rolled into Marriage Seminars, again in response to
couples' concerns about time commitment, adding one session to the seminars and
allowing all participants access to that important information.
Not being able to begin services October 1 did create some problems related to
completing goals. However, due to the pilot project initiated by Weld County, we were
able to have the first marriage seminar in January. This contributed to completing and
exceeding some of the goals. Marriage Mentoring got off the ground, with 6 couples
participating. Additional couples went through preparation to begin that activity, and
others expressed interest in it, but they will have to wait until year two to begin.
Marriage Boosters could not be scheduled until couples had completed the Marriage
Seminars, with the late start impacting the number of couples that could participate
before the end of Year I.
10/29/2007
VIII. Financial Status— SF 269 (Long Form): You are required to submit this standard
form to report the financial status of your project to the ACF Office of Grants
Management. Click here to access a blank SF 269 Long Form, or it can also be
accessed here: http://www.acf.hhs.gov/qrants/grants resources.html
See Attached.
Glossary for terminology in these instructions:
' Target- A numerical objective indicating a project's desired level of achievement during the
budget period (i.e. FY 2007). Refer to your approved grant application when possible.
2 # during this reporting period served — Identify the number of participants that have
received a minimum of eight hours of marriage education.
3 # to date completed — Identify the number of participants that have completed your marriage
education program. If class is more than eight hours, completed can be counted as receiving at
least 75% of the curriculum.
Reports are to be submitted by October 30,2007.
Please submit two hard copies of your final report to your assigned Grants Management Specialist:
To send by U.S. Postal Service:
Ms. Carla Stuckey
Grants Management Specialist
Office of Grants Management
370 L'Enfant Promenade, SW
6th Floor East
10/29/2007
Washington, DC 20447
Phone: (202) 401-4965
As a courtesy to the Office of Grants Management, please do not send binders, as there
is limited storage space.
Please provide an electronic copy to your assigned program specialist at the OFA Office:
Ms. Michele Walters
Federal Project Officer
Office of Family Assistance
370 L'Enfant Promenade, SW
5th Floor East
Washington, DC 20447
Phone: (202) 401-5726
Email: michele.walters@acf.hhs.gov
10/29/2007
Hello