HomeMy WebLinkAbout20071332.tiff SITE SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND USE BY SPECIAL
REVIEW (USR) APPLICATION
FOR PLANNING DEPARTMENT USE DATE RECEIVED:
RECEIPT#/AMOUNT# /$ CASE#ASSIGNED:
APPLICATION RECEIVED BY PLANNER ASSIGNED:
Parcel Number: 080111000030
Legal Description: Lot A of Amended Recorded Exemption AMRE-178 being part of Section 11,Township 6 N, Range
64 W.
Flood Plain:None Zone District:Agricultural (A) Total Acreage:591.03 Acreage for USR: 591.03
Overlay District None Geological Hazard: None
FEE OWNER(S)OF THE PROPERTY:
Name: Brad and Scott Cockrofts Dairy LLC Phone: (970) 353-3299
Address: 27906 WCR 388 Kersey, CO 80644
APPLICANT:
Name: Brad and Scott Cockrofts Dairy LLC Phone: (970)353-3299
Address: 27906 WCR 388 Kersey, CO 80644
AUTHORIZED AGENT (See Below:Authorization must accompany applications signed by Authorized Agent)
Name: Cody Hollingsworth, AGPROfessionals, LLC
Address: 4350 Highway 66, Longmont, CO 80504
Phone: (970) 535-9318 Email: chollingsworth@agpros.com
PROPOSED USE: A Site Specific Development Plan and Special Review Permit for an Agricultural Service
Establishment primarily engaged in performing agricultural, animal husbandry, or horticultural services on a fee or
contract basis including Livestock Confinement Operations (a dairy operation for a total of 4,500 head) in the A
(Agricultural)Zone District.
I(We)hereby depose and state under penalties of perjury that all statements, proposals,and/or plans submitted with
or contained within the application are true and correct to the best of my(our)knowledge. Signatures of all fee owners
of property must sign this application. If an Authorized Agent signs,a letter of authorization from all fee owners must
be included with the application. If a corporation is the fee owner, notarized evidence must be included indicating that
the signatory has to legal authority to sign for the corporation.
Sign ur : wne or Authorized Agent Date
EXHIBIT
2007-1332
AGPRO ■
COMPLETE LAND AND RESOURCE SOLUTIONS
October 12, 2006
To Whom It May Concern
I have contracted with AGPROfessionals, LLC to process all work related to a
Site Specific Development Plan and Use by Special Review application to be
filed in Weld County. AGPROfessionals, LLC is authorized to represent Brad
and Scott Cockcroft, Brad and Scott Cockcrofts Dairy, LLC throughout this
process.
Sincerely,
r-c464. -atik
Brad Cockcroft
ceP. 4144(722-
Scott Cockcroft
ENGINEERING, PLANNING, & CONSULTING
AGPROfessionals, LLC
4350 Highway 66• Longmont,CO 80504
970.535.9318/office• 303.485.7838 /metro.970.535.9854/fax • www.agpros.com
SITE SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND USE BY SPECIAL
REVIEW(USR) QUESTIONNAIRE
The following questions are to be answered and submitted as part of the USR application. If a question
does not pertain to your use, please respond with "not applicable", with an explanation as to why the
question is not applicable.
1. Explain, in detail, the proposed use of the property.
The proposed use of this property is a Freestall Dairy, located on one contiguous parcel totaling
approximately 591.03 acres. Activities will include milking dairy cows, raising replacement stock,
composting, and farming. Supporting infrastructure includes freestall barns, buildings and corrals
for livestock husbandry, equipment storage, maintenance facilities, and waste management
control structures. This proposal is to expand the current use by right dairy of 2,364 to a Use-By-
Special Review for 4,500 cattle.
The facility will be operated under applicable local, state and federal regulations as well as
standard and traditional Dairy Farm operating and best management practices.
2. Explain how this proposal is consistent with the intent of the Weld County Code, Chapter 22
(Comprehensive Plan).
Section 22-2-60 A.Goal.1 states"Conserve agricultural land for agricultural purposes which foster
the economic health and continuance of agriculture". 1. A.Policy 1.1 states "Agricultural zoning
will be established and maintained and promote the County's agricultural industry. Agricultural
zoning is intended to provide areas for agricultural activities and other uses interdependent upon
agriculture."
The proposed use is consistent with the Weld County Comprehensive plan through the
preservation, enhancement and growth of agriculture. The facility supports commercial and
industrial uses directly related to or dependent upon agriculture. The proposed site is not located
within a flood hazard zone, a geologic hazard zone or airport overlay zone. The property use is
necessary in Weld County to preserve the agricultural economic base historically attributed to the
area. Typically, dairy operations contribute 2.5 times their gross sales into the local economy.
The proposed request is consistent with the Weld County Comprehensive Plans support of
agricultural activities.
3. Explain how this proposal is consistent with the intent of the Weld County Code, Chapter 23
(Zoning)and the zone district in which it is located.
This proposal meets the intent of the agricultural zone district where the site is located. A
livestock confinement operation exceeding four(4)animal units is permitted in the A(Agricultural)
zone district as a Use-by-Special Review. Currently there are similar uses in the area. Public
health, safety and welfare are protected through adherence to applicable county, state and
federal regulations and requirements.
4. What types of uses surround the site? Explain how the proposed use is consistent and
compatible with surrounding land uses.
Agricultural uses surround this site. Adjacent land uses are farming, and cow calf operations as
well as several existing confined animal feeding operations in the area. They are located: 1 1/2
miles southwest, one directly south and adjacent to this facility, one 1 ' miles north, and one 2 ''A
miles north. This proposal is compatible with the surrounding agricultural uses and the Weld
County Comprehensive Plan.
5. Describe, in detail, the following:
a. How many people will use this site?
At full build-out approximately fifty (50) employees, the owners and owners' family, sales
representatives and supply delivery people.
b. How many employees are proposed to be employed at this site?
At full build-out there will be approximately fifty(50)employees working over 3 shifts.
c. What are the hours of operation?
The facility will operate 24 hours per day. Equipment operations, trucks, farming
activities and maintenance activities, other than emergencies, will occur primarily during
daylight hours.
d. What type and how many structures will be erected (built)on this site?
Milking Parlor; Office; Special Needs Barn, Calving Barn, Agricultural Equipment Storage
Building; Corrals; Commodity Sheds; Freestall barns; Storm water/Process Wastewater
Containment Structures and any other accessory structures needed to operate the dairy
under the best management practices. Please refer to the site plan maps for detailed
drawings of the site and structures to be built.
e. What type and how many animals, if any, will be on this site?
This facility was originally built as a use by right dairy on 591.03 acres, allowing for 2,364
head of cattle.The applicant is requesting expand to 4,500 head. This includes milk
cows, dry cows, springers, bulls, heifers, and calves.
f. What kind (type, size, weight)of vehicles will access this site and how often?
Typical vehicles accessing this site include feed and hay delivery trucks, semi-
tractor/trailer, employee and owner vehicles, animal product vendors, and ag-related
equipment. Operating equipment includes typical farming equipment, tractors, loaders
and attachments. The following numbers are anticipated upon full build-out of the site.
Semi-Tractor Milk Trailer 14-21/wk
Semi-Tractor Commodity Trailer 10/wk
Commodity Farm Trucks 5/wk, seasonal(hay and silage)
Hay Trucks, Semi-Tractors daily during hay season
Silage—daily during silage cutting season
Rendering Truck—when needed.
Employees—Daily
Semi-Tractor, Livestock Trailer- 1/wk
g. Who will provide fire protection to the site?
Galeton.
h. What is the water source on the property? (Both domestic and irrigation).
Existing North Weld County Water District tap, One Deep Aquifer well as evidenced with
accompanying permit copy, and Irrigation water rights as historically operated in the
Larimer/Weld irrigation company.
What is the sewage disposal system on the property? (Existing and proposed).
There is currently a septic system in place for the parlor as evidenced by the permit
accompanying this application, as well as a new permit for the housing.
j. If storage or warehousing is proposed, what type of items will be stored?
Storage and warehousing are not proposed as the primary use of this site. Feed,
livestock bedding, manure, equipment parts and supplies typical of farming activities will
be stored on site.
6. Explain the proposed landscaping for the site. The landscaping shall be separately
submitted as a landscape plan map as part of the application submittal.
The will be no additional Landscaping.
7. Explain any proposed reclamation procedures when termination of the Use by Special Review
activity occurs.
Reclamation procedures include compliance with applicable state regulations to manage solid
manure and stormwater runoff until all relative material is adequately removed. Should the facility
be permanently discontinued for use as a dairy, it would be marketed under applicable county
planning and zoning regulations to its greatest and best use.
8. Explain how the storm water drainage will be handled on the site.
Storm water drainage will be handled with one solid separator, two settling basins and two lagoon
ponds. The ponds will be maintained and operated in accordance with the Comprehensive
Nutrient Management Plan. Specific details regarding storm water management are outlined in
the Comprehensive Nutrient Management Plan.
9. Explain how long it will take to construct this site and when construction and landscaping is
scheduled to begin.
This site was initially constructed as a use by right dairy. Construction for the use-by-right
capacity is complete. The dairy now wishes to expand to 4,500 head of cattle and apply for a
Use-By-Special Review permit.
10. Explain where storage and/or stockpile of wastes will occur on this site.
The manure produced at the facility will be composted or hauled off and provided to local farmers.
Storm water and process wastewater will be stored in wastewater retention structures, which are
designed to meet all required regulations. No hazardous material storage is proposed for this
site. Stormwater and wastewater will be periodically land applied at agronomic rates. Details of
the manure management system are outlined in the Nutrient Management Plan. Debris and
refuse will be collected and removed by a local trash service, such as Waste Management or BFI.
Brad and Scott Cockrofts Dairy, LLC
Manaxement Plan
For
Nuisance Control
For
Brad and Scott Cockrofts Dairy, LLC
Brad and Scott Cockroft
279036 WCR 388
Kersey, CO 80644
Developed in accordance with
Generally Accepted Agricultural Best Management Practices
Prepared By
AGPROfessionals, LLC
4350 Highway 66
Longmont, CO 80504
October 2006
Brad and Scott Cockrofts Dairy,LLC
AGPROfessionals,LLC
Introduction
This supplemental Management Plan for Nuisance Control has been developed and implemented
to identify methods that Brad and Scott Cockrofts Dairy, LLC, will use to minimize the inherent
conditions that exist in confinement feeding operations. This supplement outlines management
practices generally acceptable and proven effective at minimizing nuisance conditions. Neither
nuisance management nor this supplemental plan is required by Colorado State statute or
specifically outlined in the Colorado Confined Animal Feeding Operations Control Regulations.
This is a proactive measure to assist integration into local communities. Brad and Scott
Cockrofts Dairy, LLC will use these management and control practices, to their best and
practical extent.
Legal Owner, Contacts and Authorized Persons
Correspondence and Contacts should be made to:
Scott Cockroft
Brad Cockroft
27906 WCR 388
Kersey, CO 80644
The individual(s) at this facility who is (are) responsible for developing the implementation;
maintenance and revision of this supplemental plan are listed below.
Scott Cockroft Owner
(Name) (Title)
Brad Cockroft Owner
(Name) (Title)
Legal Description
The confined animal feeding facility described in this NMP is located at:
Lot A of Amended Recorded Exemption RE-178 being part of Section 11, Township 6N, Range
64W of the 6th P.M.
2
Brad and Scott Cockrofts Dairy,LLC
AGPROfessionals,LLC
Air Quality
Air quality at and around confined animal feeding operations are affected primarily from the
relationship of soil/manure and available moisture. The two primary air quality concerns at
dairies are dust and odor. However, the management practices for dust or odor control are not
inherently compatible. Wet pens and manure produce odor. Dry pens are dusty. The two
paragraphs below outline the best management practices for the control of dust and odors that
Brad and Scott Cockrofts Dairy, LLC will use. The manager shall closely observe pen
conditions and attempt to achieve a balance between proper dust and odor control.
Dust
Dust from pen surfaces is usually controlled by intensive management of the pen surface by
routine cleaning and harrowing of the pen surface. The purpose of intensive surface
management is twofold; to keep cattle clean and to reduce pest habitat. The best management
systems for dust control involve moisture management. Management methods Brad and Scott
Cockrofts Dairy, LLC shall use to control dust are:
1. Pen density
Moisture will be managed by varying stocking rates and pen densities. The animal's wet
manure and urine keep the surface moist and control dust emissions. Stocking rates in
new portions of the facility will be managed to minimize dust.
2. Regular manure removal
Brad and Scott Cockrofts Dairy, LLC will continue to conduct regular manure removal.
Manure removal and pen maintenance will be conducted as needed.
3. Sprinkler systems
Sprinkler systems, timed appropriately, are an effective method for keeping pen surfaces
moist. Dairy cattle produce significant moisture through urine and feces. Pens surfaces
are extensively maintained for cattle health.
4. Water Trucks
Should nuisance dust conditions arise; water tanker trucks or portable sprinkling systems
may be used for moisture control on pens and roadways to minimize nuisance dust
conditions.
Odor
Odors result from the natural decomposition processes that start as soon as the manure is
excreted and continue as long as any usable material remains as food for microorganisms living
everywhere in soil, water and the manure. Odor strength depends on the kind of manure, and the
conditions under which it decomposes. Although occasionally unpleasant, the odors are not
'` dangerous to health in the quantities customarily notices around animal feeding operations and
fields where manure is spread for fertilizer.
3
Brad and Scott Cockrofts Dairy,LLC
AGPROfessionals,LLC
Brad and Scott Cockrofts Dairy, LLC will use the methods and management practices listed
below for odor control:
1. Establish good pen drainage
Dry manure is less odorous than moist manure. The dairy will conduct routine pen
cleaning and surface harrowing to reduce standing water and dry or remove wet manure.
2. Regular manure removal
Reduce the overall quantity of odor producing sources. The dairy will conduct routine
pen cleaning and harrowing as needed.
3. Composting
Reduces volume, nutrients and minimizes odor and pests.
4. Reduce standing water
Standing water can increase microbial digestion and odor producing by-products. Proper
pen maintenance and surface grading will be conducted by the dairy to reduce standing
water.
The stormwater ponds will be dewatered regularly in accordance with the Manure and
Wastewater Management Plan for Brad and Scott Cockrofts Dairy, LLC. No chemical
additives or treatments of the stormwater ponds for odor control are planned. Research to
date indicates poor efficacy, if any, of these products.
5. Land application timing
Typically air rises in the morning and sinks in the evening. Brad and Scott Cockrofts
Dairy, LLC will consider weather conditions and prevailing wind direction to minimize
odors from land application.
If it is determined that nuisance dust and odor conditions persist, Brad and Scott Cockrofts
Dairy, LLC may increase the frequency of the respective management practices previously
outline such as pen cleaning, surface grading and pen maintenance. Additionally, if nuisance
conditions continue to persist beyond increased maintenance interval controls, Brad and Scott
Cockrofts Dairy, LLC will install physical or mechanical means such as living windbreaks
and/or solid fences to further minimize nuisance conditions from dust and odors.
Insects and rodents inhabit areas that 1) have an adequate to good food supply and 2) foster
habitat prime for breeding and living. Key practices Brad and Scott Cockrofts Dairy, LLC will
use to manage insects and rodents are to first eliminate possible habitat and then reduce the
available food supply.
-_-._------------
Brad and Scott Cockrofts Dairy, LLC will control flies by:
Pest Control
4
Brad and Scott Cockrofts Dairy, LLC
AGPROfessionals,LLC
Insects and Rodents
1. Regular manure removal and composting
Manure management removes both food sources and habitat
2. Reduce standing water
Standing water is a primary breeding ground for insects
3. Minimize fly habitat
Standing water, weeds and grass, manure stockpiles, etc., are all prime habitat for
reproduction and protection. Reduce or eliminate these areas where practical.
4. Weeds and grass management
Keep weeds and grassy areas to a minimum. These provide both protection and breeding
areas.
5. Minimize stockpiles or storage of manure
Stockpiles of manure provide both breeding and protective habitat. Keep stockpile use to
a minimum.
6. Biological treatments
Parasitic wasps are excellent biological fly control and are widely used. The wasps lay
their eggs in fly larvae hindering fly reproduction.
7. Baits and chemical treatments
Due to environmental and worker's safety concerns, chemical treatments are a last line of
defense for insect control. Baits and treatments must be applied routinely. However,
they are very effective.
Rodent control at Brad and Scott Cockrofts Dairy, LLC is best achieved by minimizing spillage
of feedstuffs around the operation. Good housekeeping practices and regular feedbunk cleaning,
site grading and maintenance are used to reduce feed sources. Rodent traps and chemical
treatments are effective control methods and will be used as necessary.
In the event it is determines nuisance conditions from pest such as flies and rodents persist, Brad
and Scott Cockrofts Dairy, LLC will initially increase the frequency of the housekeeping and
management practices outlines previously. Iffurther action is necessary, Brad and Scott
Cockrofts Dairy, LLC will increase use of chemical controls and treatments, such as fly sprays
and baits and Rodendicide for pest control.
5
WELD COUNTY ROAD ACCESS INFORMATION SHEET
Weld County Public Works Department Date: August 10,2006
1111 H Street, P.O. Box 758, Greeley, CO 80632
Phone: (970)356-4000, Ext.3750 Fax: (970)304-6497
1. Applicant Name: Brad and Scott Cockroft Dairy LLC Address: 27906 WCR 388 Kersey, CO
Phone: 970-353-3299
2. Address or location of access: The Primary access will be from CR 72. Approximately'/3 mile east of WCR 57.
Weld County Road#72 Side of Road: South Distance from nearest intersection: Approximately'%mile
east of W CR57.
Is there an existing access to the property? Yes,there are several agricultural entrances that will be preserved.
Please See attached drawings.
3. Legal: Lot A of RE-178 being part of Section 11.Township 6 N, Range 64 W.
4. Proposed Use: 4500 head Dairy Site,with supporting Structures,and Irrigated Farm Ground
5. Site Sketch: Please see
attached.
Legend for Access Description:
AGR= Agricultural
RES = Residential ACRES
O&G = Oil&Gas
OUT
D.R. = Ditch Road House
AG
OIL
•
AG
AG/OIL DITCH
DITCH •s
OIL
fr -
L
OFFICE USE ONLY:
Road ADT Date Accidents Date
Road ADT Date Accidents Date
Drainage Requirement Culvert Size Length
Special Conditions
Installation authorized ❑ Information Insufficient
Reviewed By: Title:
r-.
It I 27/DCo
Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment
Nutrient Management Plan Form for USR
GENERAL INFORMATION:
Name of Facility:_CBS Dairy
Facility Physical f.ocation:_28275 CR 72,Gill CO,80624
PRODUCTION AREA SECTION:
A. STORAGE OF MANURE AND PROCESS WASTEWATER -61.17(8)(c)(i)
The CAFO will ensure adequate storage of manure and process wastewater,including procedures to ensure proper operation and maintenance of the
impoundments and tanks.
The following procedures will be followed by the facility:
(A) Except during the designed storm event,manure and process wastewater stored in impoundments and terminal tanks will be
removed as necessary to maintain a minimum of two feet of freeboard,or Department-approved alternative freeboard.
(B) Whenever the design capacity of impoundments and tanks is less than the volume required to store runoff from the 7 25-Year,24-
Hour Storm,X Chronic Storm or I 100-Year,24-Hour Storm the structures will be dewatered to a level that restores the required
capacity once soils on a land application site have the water holding capacity to receive process wastewater.
Process Wastewater Storage Information:
2. Total Capacity Required to 3. Total Capacity Required to
I. Impoundment/Tank/Drainage Hold all Wastes Accumulated Contain Storm Event Runoff 4.Total Capacity Available(acre-feet)
Basin ID During the Storage Period and Direct Precipitation
(acre-feet) (acre-feet)
West lagoon 30.9 (4 months) 10.58 26.53
East lagoon 26.53
Compost Berm 0 5.51 9.22
Manure Storage Information:
3. Total Amount of Non-pen Area Manure Storage
I. Manure Storage Area ID 2. Amount of Manure Produced(tons/year)
Available(tons)
Manure Storage 98,879(4500 cows) 211,000(part of 26A)
Check here X if excess manure is transferred to a third party.
Check here--. if manure is stockpiled in pen area.
RECORDKEEPING REQUIREMENT:
1)Docummtafiam that except during the designed storm event,manure and process wastewater stored in impoundments anitamiml tanks is
ruined as necessary to maintain d-.'a minimum of two(2)feet of freaboand,except what the operator has requested and the Ag Program has approved
ma altern&ive freeboard leveL
2)Documentation that whenever the available capacity of impoundments and tanks is less than the volume required to stare runoff from the designed
storm event,the structures shall be dewatered to a level that=tires the required capacity once soils on a land application site have the water holding
capacity to receive process wastewater.
B. MORTALITY MANAGEMENT—61.17(8)(c)(ii)
The CAFO will ensure proper management of animal mortalities to ensure that they are not disposed of in a liquid manure,storm water,or process
wastewater storage system that is not specifically designed to treat animal mortalities.
Method of Animal Mortalities Handling(check all that are applicable):
r. Composting
X Rendering
P Burial
Other:
RECORDKEEPING REQUIREMENT:
1)Documentation that amaea the proper management of animal mortalities to ensure that they are not disposed of in a liquid manure,storm water,
or process wastewater storage system that is not specifically designed to treat animal mortalities.
NMP for CBS Dairy USR Page 1 of 7
C. CLEAN WATER DIVERSION—61.17(S)(cxiii)
The CAFO will ensure that clean water resulting from the-. 25-Year,24-Hour Storm,X Chronic Storm or r 1100-Year,24-Hour Storm is diverted
from the production area.
Clean water diversions used(check all that are applicable):
Location Used:
n Berms
X Channels North and west
X Natural Topography South and east
[I Other
RECORDKEEPING REQUIREMENT:
1)Doeumenlatice that clam water is diverted from the designed storm event from the production area
D. PREVENTION OF DIRECT CONTACT OF ANIMALS WITH WATERS OF THE UNITED STATES-61.17(8)(c)(iv)
The CAFO will prevent direct contact of confined animals with surface waters.
Waters of the U.S.means,in part:
a) All waters...susceptible to use in interstate or foreign commerce...;
b) All interstate waters...;
c) All other waters such as intrastate lakes,rivers,streams(including intermittent streams),mudflats,sandflats,wetlands'(including
wetlands adjacent to waters identified in(a)through(e)of this definition),sloughs,prairie potholes,wet meadows,playa lakes,or natural
ponds the use,degradation,or destruction of which would affect or could affect interstate or foreign commerce including any such waters:
I) Which are or could be used by interstate or foreign travelers for recreational or other purposes;
2) From which fish or shellfish are or could be taken and sold in interstate or foreign commerce;or
3) Which are used or could be used for industrial purposes...;
d) All impoundments of waters otherwise defined as waters of the United States under this definition';and
e) Tributaries of waters identified in paragraphs(a)through(d)of this definition.
Wetlands means those areas that are inundated or saturated by surface or groundwater at a frequency and duration sufficient to support,and that
under normal circumstances do support,a prevalence of vegetation typically adapted for life in saturated soil conditions.
'Waste treatment systems,including treatment ponds or lagoons designed to meet the requirements of CWA(other than cooling ponds as defined in
40 CFR 423.11(m)which also meet the criteria of this definition)are not waters of the United States. This exclusion applies only to manmade bodies
of water which neither were originally created in waters of the United States(such as disposal area in wetlands)nor resulted from the impoundment
of waters of the United States.
1. Do waters of the U.S.flow throu, the rroduction area? ❑ Yes X No
2. Do the animals have access to waters of the United States? Yes X No
3. If yes,list the measures used to prevent direct contact(e.g.fencing)of animals with waters of the United States:
n/a
RECORDKEEPING REQUIREMENT:
1)Dacuionthat that fa prevention of direct cmteet of cmfined animals with waters of the United States.
E. CHEMICAL AND OTHER CONTAMINANT HANDLING—61.17(8)(c)(v)
The CAFO will ensure chemicals and other contaminants handled on-site are not disposed of in any manure,storm water,or process wastewater
storage system unless specifically designed to treat such chemicals and other contaminants.
Check all that are applicable:
X Chemicals are used and empty containers are disposed of in accordance with manufacturer's guidelines
Li Chemicals are not stored in a room with a floor drain that discharges outside
X Where are chemicals stored:milk parlor with floor drain plug
X Storage is covered
X Storage has secondary containment-fuel
X Chemicals are stored in proper containers
X Where are chemicals disposed:_not in wastewater ponds.
No chemicals are used at the facility
X Other:No pesticides are used
RECORDKEEPING REQUIREMENT:
I)Docomadationt at chemicals and other contaminants handled on-site are not disposed of in any manure,storm water,or process wastewater
storage system unless specifically designed to treat such chemicals and other metammmis.
NMP for CBS Dairy USR Page 2 of 7
LAND APPLICATION SECTION:
If manure or process wastewater will be applied to a land application site,check the box here and go to Part(F):X
If neither manure nor process wastewater will be applied to a land application site or be transferred to a third party,check the box here and go to Part(M):'
If neither manure nor process wastewater will be applied to a land application site,but one or both will be transferred to a third party,check the box here
and go to Part(G)then to Part(M): I I
F. CONSERVATION PRACTICES—61.17(8)(c)(vi)
The CAFO will identify and implement site-specific conservation practices to control runoff of pollutants to surface water.
I. Conservation Practices for Land Application Sites
Please indicate where any of the following best management practices are being implemented to control runoff of pollutants to surface water:
Conservation Practice: Land Application Site ID Where Practice is Implemented(for land
application sites where surface water is located in or down-gradient of
the she):
Buffer SW cmr of NW pivot,NE cmr of SW pivot,N cmr of SE pivot,N field
Setback East dryland,south dryland,NW corner of SE pivot
Conservation Tillage
Constructed Wetland
Infiltration Field
Grass Filter
Terrace
Tail Water Pit
Process wastewater is not allowed to reach end of field
Other(describe):
2. The facility will also implement the following conservation practices:
� •, (A) Solid manure will be incorporated as soon as possible after application,unless the application site has perennial vegetation or is no-tilled
cropped,or except where the nutrient management plan adequately demonstrates that surface water quality will be protected where manure is not
so incorporated.
(B) Process wastewater to furrow-or flood-irrigated land application sites will be applied in a manner that prevents any process wastewater runoff
into surface waters.
(C) When process wastewater is sprinkler-applied,the soil water holding capacity of the soil will not be exceeded.
(D) Process wastewater will not be applied to either frozen or flooded(i.e.,saturated)land application sites.
(E) Manure or process wastewater will not be land-applied within 150 feet of domestic water supply wells,and within 300 feet of community
domestic water supply wells.
RECORDREEPING REQUIREMENT:
I)Docmnentatim that Snepeci9c moservaticatp¢actices Lave been identi&d and implemented to control runoff of pollutants to seduce water.
G. SAMPLING&TESTING OF MANURE,PROCESS WASTEWATER,AND SOIL—61.17(SXc)(vii)land associated parts of a CAFO permits
The CAFO will identify protocols for appropriate sampling and testing of manure,process wastewater,and soil.
Manure Process Wastewater Soil
Frequency of X Annually X Annually For nitrate-As often as necessary to meet the
Sampling: (If analyses are conducted (If analyses are conducted application rate calculation requirements:
more frequently than more frequently than (indicate frequency)yearly/semiannual for double crops
annually,the analyses must annually,the analyses must For phosphorus-minimum of once every 5 years or as
be kept on-site for 5 years.) be kept on-site for 5 years.) necessary to meet the transport risk assessment
requirements
Analyzed for: Total Nitrogen,Ammonia(as Total Nitrogen,Ammonia Nitrate-to necessary depth zone(s);
N),Nitrate(as N),and Total (as N),Nitrate(as N),and Phosphorus—top one-foot
Phosphorus Total Phosphorus
Sampling X CSU Cooperative X CSUCE 568 A X CSUCE 568 A
Protocol Used: Extension(CE)568 A Other CSUCE Publication
(please cite):
- Adjacent State CE Publication
(please cite):
Testing Protocol ri CSUCE X USEPA Method X "Methods of Soil Analysis,Part 3,Chemical
Used: X Department-approved Department-approved Methods"
Method(requested in Method(requested in - Department-approved Method(requested in
writing) writing) writing)
NMP for CBS Dairy USR Page 3 of 7
H. NUTRIENT BUDGETINFORMATION—61.17(8)(c)(x)(ARVI)
Nutrient Budget Information:
Crop: Manure and Process Wastewater Application Rate Description of Method(calculation/table)to be Used:
Calculated:
KSU Bulletin MF-2227
Triticale pasture ] CSUCE Published Fertilizer Suggestions
X Adjacent State CE-Published Fertilizer Suggestions [(yield goal(lbs/a DM))*(0.04)*(1.0)]-(7.2 x ppm NO3-
CNMP Method that meets USDA-NRCS standards N(24 in))—(30 x%OM)—previous manure application
- CO NRCS NMP guidelines credit-plow down legume credit
i Department-approved Method
Bulletin 568A
Sorghum for X CSUCE Published Fertilizer Suggestions
grazing '.! Adjacent State CE-Published Fertilizer Suggestions [9 x yield goal(t/a)]—[8 x ppm soil NO3-N(ave 2 ft)]-[30 x
CNMP Method that meets USDA-NRCS standards %OM]-previous manure application credits-plow down
H CO NRCS NMP guidelines legume credit
LI Department-approved Method
Table 13.04,CSU Do-it-Yourself Nutrient Management Plan
Grass Pasture X CSUCE Published Fertilizer Suggestions
f I Adjacent State CE-Published Fertilizer Suggestions Maximum 185 lbs N with little soil nitrate. See attachment.
I l CNMP Method that meets USDA-NRCS standards Subtractions include-(30 x%OM)—previous manure
_. CO NRCS NMP guidelines application credit
Department-approved Method
Soil publication#0.565
Alfalfa Pasture X CSUCE Published Fertilizer Suggestions
Adjacent State CE-Published Fertilizer Suggestions [yield(lbs/a)x(%protein/6.25)x(0.6 soil type
Li CNMP Method that meets USDA-NRCS standards adjustment)]/0.66 efficiency factor—(7.2 x ppm NO3-N(24
f 1 CO NRCS NMP guidelines in))-(30 x%OM)-previous manure application credit
Department-approved Method
ri CSUCE Published Fertilizer Suggestions
Adjacent State CE-Published Fertilizer Suggestions
CNMP Method that meets USDA-NRCS standards
LI CO NRCS NMP guidelines
!I Department-approved Method
fl CSUCE Published Fertilizer Suggestions
ri Adjacent State CE-Published Fertilizer Suggestions
- CNMP Method that meets USDA-NRCS standards
CO NRCS NMP guidelines
1.1 Department-approved Method
Describe how realistic yield goals will be determined:
Crops are grazed and provide only part of the nutrient requirements of the animal. Therefore an average for the area as determined by CSU Extension,
NRCS,or FSA will be used unless a more accurate determination of intake can be made(ie.reduction in intake of TMR,etc.)
RECORDKEEPING REQUIREMENT:
1)Dncomeniatim afihe idmtifcation of protocols fin-appropriate sampling and testing of manure,promo wastewater,and moil.
NMP for CBS Dairy USR Page 4 of 7
I. LAND APPLICATION—61.17(8)(c)(viii)
The CAFO will establish protocols to land apply manure or process wastewater in accordance with site specific nutrient management
practices that ensure appropriate agricultural utilization of the nutrients in the manure or process wastewater.
The facility will implement the following protocols:
(A) No application of manure or process wastewater will be made to a land application site at a rate that will exceed the
capacity of the soil and the planned crops to assimilate nitrate-nitrogen within 12 months of the manure or process
wastewater being applied.
(B) Manure and process wastewater shall be applied as uniformly as possible with properly calibrated equipment.
I) Method(s)of manure application?Spreader truck
2) Method(s)of process wastewater application?pivot
3) Is nutrient application equipment calibrated at least annually? X Yes 11 No
RECORDREEP/NG REQUIREMENT:
1)Documentation that protocols have been established Br land application of mamas or proms wastewater in accordance with site-
specific nutrient management practices that ensure appropriate agricultural utilization of the nutrients in the mamas or process
wastewater.
J. PHOSPHORUS AND NITROGEN TRANSPORT—61.17(8)(c)(x)(A)
Application rates for manure and process wastewater applied to land application sites will minimize phosphorus and nitrogen transport
from the sites to surface waters and will be in accordance with the following standards:
(I) An initial assessment of the potential for phosphorus and nitrogen transport risk to surface water will be made prior to
manure or process wastewater being applied to an application site. There is currently no published tool suitable for
assessing nitrogen transport risk. Phosphorus and nitrogen transport risk assessment will be made using the Colorado
Phosphorus Index Risk Assessment.
The following flow chart will be used to determine whether or not a phosphorus risk assessment must be completed
for a land application sites:
Will animal manure or other organic
nutrients be applied to this site?
A Colorado Phosphorus Index
NO —♦ Risk Assessment is not
required for this site.
YES
1
Is soil test P greater than: A Colorado Phosphorus Risk
10 ppm AB-DTPA;30 ppm Bray P1;40 NO Assessment is not required for
ppm Mehlich 3,or;20 ppm Olsen this site. Base organic nutrient
(NaHCO,) application rates on crop
nitrogen requirements.
YES
Can storm water runoff or irrigation A Colorado Phosphorus Risk
tailwater reach a surface water body? NO Assessment is not required for
(Continuous or intermittent stream, this site. Base organic nutrient
irrigation ditch,lake,or wetland,etc.) application rates on crop
nitrogen requirements.
YES
117
Complete a Colorado Phosphorus Index
Risk Assessment for this site.
NMP for CBS Dairy USR Page 5 of 7
J. PHOSPHORUS AND NITROGEN TRANSPORT—61.17(S)(c)(x)(A)(continued)
On sites for which the facility must complete a Colorado Phosphorus Index Risk Assessment,the following best management
practices will be incorporated,if applicable:
(A) Phosphorus-based manure and process wastewater application rates will be made to an application site where the risk of
off-site phosphorus transport is scored as high.
(B) No application of manure or process wastewater will be made to a land application site where the risk of off-site
phosphorus transport is rated as very high. (Where the initial assessment of a land application site is scored as very high,
the facility has a three-year period within which to manage the site for the purpose of lowering the phosphorus transport
risk assessment rating to high or less. During this period,manure or process wastewater may be applied to the site at either
nitrogen-or phosphorus-based rates.)
(C) No application of manure or process wastewater will be made to a land application site where the risk of off-site nitrogen
transport to surface water is not minimized.
(D) Where a multi-year phosphorus application was made to a land application site,no additional manure or process
wastewater will be applied to the same site in subsequent years until the applied phosphorus has been removed from the
site via harvest and crop removal.
After an initial assessment is made of potential for phosphorus and/or nitrogen transport from a land application site to surface water,
additional assessments will be made at the following frequency,whichever is sooner:
Both phosphorus and nitrogen transport risk Every 5 years
Where a crop management change has occurred For phosphorus-Assess within I year after such a change would
reasonably result in an increase in the transport risk assessment
score.
For nitrogen—Assess within I year after such a change would
reasonably result in the nitrogen transport to surface water not
being minimized.
Where a phosphorus transport risk assessment score was very Assess phosphorus transport risk within 6 months of intending to
high apply manure or process wastewater,except where the initial
assessment is scored as very high,then there shall be a three-year
period within which to manage the site for the purpose of
lowering the phosphorus transport risk assessment rating to high
or less. During this period,manure or process wastewater may
be applied to the site at either nitrogen-or phosphorus-based
ratCS.
Where a nitrogen transport risk assessment reveals that nitrogen Assess nitrogen transport risk within 6 months of intending to
transport to surface water is not minimized apply manure or process wastewater.
K. INSPECT LAND APPLICATION EQUIPMENT—61.17(S)(c)(x)(C)
The CAFO will periodically inspect equipment used for land application of manure or process wastewater for leaks.
The facility will inspect land application equipment at the following frequencies:
(1) Annually(within the six month period prior to the first application of manure or process wastewater);and
(2) At least once daily when process wastewater is being applied
L. SETBACK REQUIREMENTS—61.17(S)(cXx)(D)
The CAFO will not apply manure and process wastewater:
(I) Closer than 100 feet to any down-gradient surface waters,open tile line intake structures,sinkholes,agricultural
wellheads,or other conduits to surface waters unless one of the following is implemented:
(II) 35-foot vegetated buffer to any down-gradient water of the U.S.,open tile intake structures,sinkholes,
agricultural wellheads,or other conduits to waters of the U.S.where applications of manure,litter,or
process wastewater are prohibited.
(III) Alternative compliance practices to the 100-foot setback with prior approval of the Department.
Please describe:
Compliance Practice Implemented Land Application Site ID Where
[(I), (II)or(III)above): Practice is Implemented:
Down-gradient Surface Waters I(setback)and II(buffer) See Fl above
Open Tile Line Intake Structure
Sinkholes
Agricultural Wellheads
Other Conduits to Surface Waters
NMP for CBS Dairy USR Page 6 of 7
M. CERTIFICATION STATEMENT
I certify under penalty of law that this document and al/attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance
with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my
inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system,or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information,the
information submitted is to the best of my knowledge and belief true,accurate and complete. I am aware that there are significant
penalties for submitting false information,including the possibility offine and imprisonment for knowing violations.
A. NAME AND OFFICIAL TITLE(PRINT OR TYPE) B. PHONE NUMBER
( )
C. SIGNATURE DATE
D. SIGNED
NMP for CBS Dairy USR Page 7 of 7
Olsen's Agricultural Laboratory, Inc. . :
210 E. First St. / P.O. BOX 370 / McCook, Nebraska 69001
Office: 308-345-3670 / FAX: 800-886-7422
Website: http://www.olsenlab.com
e
MANURE NUTRIENT REPORT
ACCOUNT#22330
AGPRO ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
4350 HWY 66 SAMPLED:
LONGMONT CO 80504 RECEIVED: 09/22/2005
REPORTED: 09/30/2005
LAB NO:
NAME: ID:
Constituent lbs per ton
Analyzed Results (as received basis) Method
Moisture 64.87 % 105 C 5HR
Solids 35.13.% 105 C 5HR
Ash 23.44 % AOAC 942.05
pH 7.90 s.u. SM 4500 B
Electrical Conductivity 8.50 mmhos/cm SM 4500 B
Soluble Salts 0.54 % 10.8 SM 4500 B
Total Nitrogen (N) 0.58 % 11.6 AOAC 984.13
Organic Nitrogen (N) 0.52 % 10.4. TN-NH4-NO3 '.
Ammonium-N(N) 0.06 % 1.20 SM 4500 H
,crate-N (N) 0.0004 % 0.01 - EPA 353.2
Phosphorus (P) 0.14 % 2.8 AOAC 985.01
Phosphorus(P2O5) 6.4
Potassium (K) 0.39 % 7.8 AOAC 985.01
Potassium (K2O) 9.4
Calcium (Ca) 0.74 % 14.8 AOAC 985.01
Magnesium (Mg) 0.16 % 3.2 AOAC 985.01
Sodium (Na) 0.09 % 1.8 AOAC 985.01
Chloride(CI) 0.13 % 2.6 LACHAT12117071A
Sulfur(S) 0.09 % 1.8 AOAC 985.01
Zinc(Zn) 27.1 mg/kg 0.05 AOAC 985.01
Iron (Fe) 1159.7 mg/kg 2.32 AOAC 985.01
Mangenese(Mn) 42.9 mg/kg 0.09 AOAC 985.01
Copper (Cu) 148.2 mg/kg 0.30 AOAC 985.01
Boron(B) 11.0 mg/kg 0.02 AOAC 985.01 `r
sot The- if yourscir manure v 1oolacevnevt! Plan
Nutrient Recommendations for Grasses
Table 13.04. Nitrogen recommendations for irrigated grasses
(4 tons/acre).
Soil NO3-N* Fertilizer rate
(ppm) (lb N/A)
0 - 6 185
7 - 12 160
13 - 18 135
19 - 24 110
25 - 30 85
> 30 0
* -Concentration of NO3-N(ppm) in the top foot of soil.
Add or subtract 40 lb N/A for every ton/acre above or below 4 tons/A.
Use the same N rates for grass-legume mixtures containing less than 25% legumes.
Table 13.05. Phosphorus recommendations for irrigated grasses, grass-
legume mixtures, and pastures.
Relative Broadcast Fertilizer
Soil test P (ppm)* Level Rate
AB-DTPA NaHCO3 (lb P2O5/A)
0 - 3 0 - 6 low 80
4 - 7 7 - 14 medium 40
> 7 > 14 high 0
* -Concentration of P in the top foot of soil.
13.5
\\z7)0(e
Runoff Calculations
CBS Dairy,for USR
Stormwater Runoff&Pond Capacity Calculations
25-year,24-hour storm amount taken oft of NOAA ATLAS 2,Volume III-Isopiuvials of 25-yr,24 25-24 Event
hr precipitation map,and within the immediate area of the facility. EARTHEN BLDG Total COMPOST
Applicable Storm Event for Location,inches 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
SCS Runoff Curve Number(90 for unsurfaced lots) 90 97 90
(97 for surfaced lots)
S(potential mar retention after runoff begins),inches 1.11 0.31 1.11
Drainage Basin Area,Acres 32.9 2.3 35.2 26
(Separate different drainage areas)
Runoff Produced,Inches 1.98 2.66 1.98
Volume of Runoff Produced,Acre-Ft. 5.44 0.51 5.95 4.30
Surface Area of Ponds,Acres 0.00 0.00 10.26 1.51
Volume Falling Directly on Ponds,Acre-Ft. 0.00 0.00 2.57 0.38
Total Pond Volume Required,Acre-Ft. 8.51 4.68
10-year,10-day storm amount taken from NRCS calculated data of 10-year events according to Chronic Event
�..� Colorado General CAR)Permit requirements,and from the nearest station to the facility EARTHEN BLDG Combined COMPOST
(Sterling,CO).
Applicable Storm Event for Location,Inches 4.21 4.21 4.21 4.21
SCS Runoff Curve Number(81 for unsmfaced lots)' 81 94 81
(94 for surfaced rots)*
S(potential mar retention after runoff begins),inches 2.35 0.64 2.35
Drainage Basin Area,Acres 32.9 2.3 35.2 26.00
(Separate different drainer areas)
Runoff Produced,Inches 2.30 3.53 2.30
Volume of Runoff Produced,Acre-Ft. 6.30 0.68 6.98 4.98
Surface Area of Ponds,Acres 0.00 0.00 10.26 1.51
Volume Falling Directly on Ponds,Acre-Ft. 0.00 0.00 3.60 0.53
Total Pond Volume Required,Acre-Ft. 10.58 5.51
'Taken from Table 2-3 8 of NRCS publication'Technical Release 60.Design of Seth Dams and Reservoirs..adjusted curve numbs from 20 hours to 10 days.
Total Capacity Required for Regulatory Storm Event,acre-feet 0.00 0.00 10.68 6.61
Total Capacity Available,acre-feet 0.00 0.00 69,06 9.22
Excess Capacity Available over Regulatory Requirement,acre-feet 0.00 0.00 42.48 3.71
4 Months Process water Storage 0.00 0.00 30.90 0.00
Optimum Capacity Required for Stormwater 8 Process Water,acre-feet 0.00 0.00 41Aa 6.51
Total Capacity Available,acre-feet 0.00 0.00 53.06 9.22
Excess Capacity Available over Optimum,acre-feet 0.00 0.00 11.68 3.71
AgPro Enveonmertal Services,LLC
Eric W.Dunker,P.E.
West Lagoon
Pond Volumes
CBS Dairy, USR
West Lagoon
Side Slope 4
Bottom Base 378
Bottom Length 378
Depth 9
Volume above
datum Acre
Depth Base Length Area Acre Feet
0.00 378.00 378.00 3.28
1.00 386.00 386.00 3.42 3.35
2.00 394.00 394.00 3.56 6.84
3.00 402.00 402.00 3.71 10.48
4.00 410.00 410.00 3.86 14.26
5.00 418.00 418.00 4.01 18.20
6.00 426.00 426.00 4.17 22.29
7.00 434.00 434.00 4.32 26.53 FREEBOARD
8.00 442.00 442.00 4.48 30.94
9.00 450.00 450.00 4.65 35.50
r-.
Settling Basin
Top I 50 420 0.48
VOLUME AVAILABLE VS. DEPTH
DEPTH VOLUME AVAILABLE
0 22.29
1 18.94
2 15.44
3 11.81 PUMPDOWN LEVEL 3.8
4 8.02
5 4.09
6 0.00
7
8
East Lagoon Pond Volume
CBS Dairy, USR
East Lagoon
Side Slope 4
Bottom Base 378
Bottom Length 378
Depth 9
Volume above
datum Acre
Depth Base Length Area Acre Feet
0.00 378.00 378.00 3.28
1.00 386.00 386.00 3.42 3.35
2.00 394.00 394.00 3.56 6.84
3.00 402.00 402.00 3.71 10.48
4.00 410.00 410.00 3.86 14.26
5.00 418.00 418.00 4.01 18.20
6.00 426.00 426.00 4.17 22.29
7.00 434.00 434.00 4.32 26.53 FREEBOARD
8.00 442.00 442.00 4.48 30.94
9.00 450.00 450.00 4.65 35.50
Settling Basin
Top I 50 420 0.48
VOLUME AVAILABLE VS. DEPTH
DEPTH VOLUME AVAILABLE
0 22.29
1 18.94
2 15.44
3 11.81 PUMPDOWN LEVEL 3.8
4 8.02
5 4.09
6 0.00
7
8
Water Balance
CBS Dairy,USR
Table 1:Stormwater/Process Wastewater Accumulation Calculation(Average Years)(Main Dairy Area) Init.Volume
Process Water Generated,GPD= 83,906 Pond Surface Area,ft= 447,000 Evaporation Area,ft' 355,840 10
Precip.' Percent Runoff Area Total Runoff Lake Evap. Evap.Area Total Evap, Process-1120 Net Change Amt.Pum ol.In Lagoor Annual Pumped
Month (inches) Runoff (Acres) (Acre-FL) (incites)"' (Acres) (Acre-Ft.) (Acre-Ft.) (Acre-Ft.) (Acre-Ft.) (Acre-FL) (Acre-Ft.)
Jan 0.49 5.0% 61.20 0.54 1.35 8.17 0.92 7.98 7.61 17.61
Feb 0.37 5.0% 61.20 0.41 1.58 8.17 1.08 7.21 6.55 24.15
Mar 1.13 5.0% 61.20 1.25 2.48 8.17 1.69 7.98 7.55 8.00 23.70
Apr 1.80 7.0% 61.20 2.18 4.05 8.17 2.76 7.73 7.15 8.00 22.85
r. May 2.47 17.0% 61.20 4.25 5.40 8.17 3.68 7.98 8.56 10.00 21.41
a Jun 1.83 15.0% 61.20 2.96 6.53 8.17 4.45 7.73 6.25 10.00 17.66 78.00
Y Jul 1.48 14.0% 61.20 2.32 6.75 8.17 4.60 7.98 5.71 10.00 13.37
Aug 1.15 12.0% 61.20 1.69 6.08 8.17 4.14 7.98 5.53 8.00 10.90
Sep 1.16 12.0% 61.20 1.70 4.50 8.17 3.06 7.73 6.36 8.00 9.26
Oct 1.00 10.0% 61.20 1.37 3.15 8.17 2.14 7.98 7.20 8.00 8.47
Nov 0.82 5.0% 61.20 0.91 1.80 8.17 1.23 7.73 7.41 8.00 7.88
Dec 0.45 5.0% 61.20 0.50 1.35 8.17 0.92 7.98 7.56 15.44
Jan 0.49 5.0% 61.20 0.54 1.35 8.17 0.92 7.98 7.61 23.05
Feb 0.37 5.0% 61.20 0.41 1.58 8.17 1.08 7.21 6.55 8.00 21.60
Mar 1.13 5.0% 61.20 1.25 2.48 8.17 1.69 7.98 7.55 8.00 21.14
Apr 1.80 7.0% 61.20 2.18 4.05 8.17 2.76 7.73 7.15 8.00 20.29
May 2.47 17.0% 61.20 4.25 5.40 8.17 3.68 7.98 8.56 10.00 18.86
Jun 1.83 15.0% 61.20 2.96 6.53 8.17 4.45 7.73 6.25 10.00 15.10 84.00
hi
o Jul 1.48 14.0% 61.20 2.32 6.75 8.17 4.60 7.98 5.71 8.00 12.81
Aug 1.15 12.0% 61.20 1.69 6.08 8.17 4.14 7.98 5.53 8.00 10.34
Sep 1.16 12.0% 61.20 1.70 4.50 8.17 3.06 7.73 6.36 8.00 8.71
Oct 1.00 10.0% 61.20 1.37 3.15 8.17 2.14 7.98 7.20 8.00 7.91
Nov 0.82 5.0% 61.20 0.91 1.80 8.17 1.23 7.73 7.41 8.00 7.32
Dec 0.45 5.0% 61.20 0.50 1.35 8.17 0.92 7.98 7.56 14.88
Jan 0.49 5.0% 61.20 0.54 1.35 8.17 0.92 7.98 7.61 22.49
Feb 0.37 5.0% 61.20 0.41 1.58 8.17 1.08 7.21 6.55 8.00 21.04
Mar 1.13 5.0% 61.20 1.25 2.48 8.17 1.69 7.98 7.55 8.00 20.59
Apr 1.80 7.0% 61.20 2.18 4.05 8.17 2.76 7.73 7.15 8.00 19.74
n May 2.47 17.0% 61.20 4.25 5.40 8.17 3.68 7.98 8.56 10.00 18.30
a Jun 1.83 15.0% 61.20 2.96 6.53 8.17 4.45 7.73 6.25 10.00 14.54 84.00
ea
co Jul 1.48 14.0% 61.20 2.32 6.75 8.17 4.60 7.98 5.71 8.00 12.25
�^ Aug 1.15 12.0% 61.20 1.69 6.08 8.17 4.14 7.98 5.53 8.00 9.78
Sep 1.16 12.0% 61.20 1.70 4.50 8.17 3.06 7.73 6.36 8.00 8.15
Oct 1.00 10.0% 61.20 1.37 3.15 8.17 2.14 7.98 7.20 8.00 7.35
Nov 0.82 5.0% 61.20 0.91 1.80 8.17 1.23 7.73 7.41 8.00 6.76
Dec 0.45 5.0% 61.20 0.50 1.35 8.17 0.92 7.98 7.56 14.33
Jan 0.49 5.0% 61.20 0.54 1.35 8.17 0.92 7.98 7.61 21.93
Feb 0.37 5.0% 61.20 0.41 1.58 8.17 1.08 7.21 6.55 8.00 20.48
Mar 1.13 5.0% 61.20 1.25 2.48 8.17 1.69 7.98 7.55 8.00 20.03
Apr 1.80 7.0% 61.20 2.18 4.05 8.17 2.76 7.73 7.15 8.00 19.18
. May 2.47 17.0% 61.20 4.25 5.40 8.17 3.68 7.98 8.56 10.00 17.74
Jun 1.83 15.0% 61.20 2.96 6.53 8.17 4.45 7.73 6.25 10.00 13.98 84.00
at Jul 1.48 14.0% 61.20 2.32 6.75 8.17 4.60 7.98 5.71 8.00 11.69
Aug 1.15 12.0% 61.20 1.69 6.08 8.17 4.14 7.98 5.53 8.00 9.23
Sep 1.16 12.0% 61.20 1.70 4.50 8.17 3.06 7.73 6.36 8.00 7.59
Oct 1.00 10.0% 61.20 1.37 3.15 8.17 2.14 7.98 7.20 8.00 6.79
Nov 0.82 5.0% 61.20 0.91 1.80 8.17 1.23 7.73 7.41 8.00 6.20
Dec 0.45 5.0% 61.20 0.50 1.35 8.17 0.92 7.98 7.56 13.77
Jan 0.49 5.0% 61.20 0.54 1.35 8.17 0.92 7.98 7.61 21.38
Feb 0.37 5.0% 61.20 0.41 1.58 8.17 1.08 7.21 6.55 8.00 19.92
Mar 1.13 5.0% 61.20 1.25 2.48 8.17 1.69 7.98 7.55 8.00 19.47
Apr 1.80 7.0% 61.20 2.18 4.05 8.17 2.76 7.73 7.15 8.00 18.62
4) May 2.47 17.0% 61.20 4.25 5.40 8.17 3.68 7.98 8.56 10.00 17.18
Jun 1.83 15.0% 61.20 2.96 6.53 8.17 4.45 7.73 6.25 10.00 13.43 84.00
41 Jul 1.48 14.0% 61.20 2.32 6.75 8.17 4.60 7.98 5.71 8.00 11.14
Aug 1.15 12.0% 61.20 1.69 6.08 8.17 4.14 7.98 5.53 8.00 8.67
Sep 1.16 12.0% 61.20 1.70 4.50 8.17 3.06 7.73 6.36 8.00 7.03
Oct 1.00 10.0% 61.20 1.37 3.15 8.17 2.14 7.98 7.20 8.00 6.24
Nov 0.82 5.0% 61.20 0.91 1.80 8.17 1.23 7.73 7.41 8.00 5.65
Dec 0.45 5.0% 61.20 0.50 1.35 8.17 0.92 7.98 7.56 13.21
Maximum Volume Pumped= 84.00 Average Volume in Pond= 14.68 Maximum Volume in Pon0= 24.15
Precipitation for Greeley,CO,NOAA "SCS,National Engineering Handbook '"Evaporation for Greeley,CO,NOAA
I..
Manure Generation
CBS Dairy,USR
Table 2:Solid Manure Produced and Associated Nutrients
ASAE D384.1 Feb'03 Moisture Manure Manure TS VS Nitrogen Prosphorus Potassium
Number of (lbs./day/ (R3/day/ (lbs./day/ (lbs./day/ (Ibs./day/ (lbs./day/ (lbs./day/
Animal Type Hd Wt./hd,lbs. Total Wt.,lbs. (%) 1000#) 1000# 1000#) 1000#) 1000#) 1000#) 1000#)
Milk Cows 4,500 1,400 6,300,000 86.0 86 1.39 12 10 0.45 0.094 0.29
Dry Cows - 1,200 - 86.0 86 1.39 12 10 0.45 0.094 0.29
Heifers - 450 - 86.0 86 1.39 12 10 0.45 0.094 0.29
Calves - 200 - 86.0 86 1.39 12 10 0.45 0.094 0.29
Totals 4,500 6,300,000
Total Daily Production 541,800 8,757 75,600 63,000 2,835 592 1,827
Total Annual Production 197,757,000 3,196,305 27,594,000 22,995,000 1,034,775 216,153 666,855
Tons produced Iv/moisture content of 86.0% 98,879
Tons to apply wl moisture content of 46.0% 25,635
Tons of compost produced w/moisture content of 40.0% 23,072
Land Application Requirements
CBS Dairy, USR
Table 3: Land Application Requirements for 25-year,24-hour Storm Event
25-year,24-hour storm volume( 13.19 A.F.),gallons 4,298,071
Total Nitrogen contained in liquid,lbs. 17,192 'Total-N= 4.0 lbs./1,000 gal
Ammonium-Nitrogen contained in liquid,lbs. 8,596 *NH4-N= 2.0 lbs./1,000 gal
Organic-Nitrogen contained in liquid, lbs. 8,596 Organic-N= 2.0 lbs./1,000 gal
Ammonium-Nitrogen available after irrigation,lbs. 4,728 45.0% Sprinkler irrigation loss'
Organic-Nitrogen available 3rd year,lbs. 3,610 42.00% Equilibrium mineralization rate for organic-N'
Nitrogen available to plants(PAN)yr.after yr., lbs. 8,338
Soil Organic Matter,% 1.0
Irrigation Water NO3 content,ppm 5.0
Residual NO3 in soil,ppm 10.0 Pasture Corn Silage
Expected Yield(grain,Bu/acre;silage,tons/acre) 4 30 Based on CSU Extension
N req.w/listed O.M.,soil N,& Irr.Water NO3,(lb./acre) 113 134 Bulletin#538
Acres req.if effluent applied via sprinkler irrigation 74 62 1.5 A.F./Acre Irrigation water assumed
*Taken from CSU's Bulletin No.568A Best Management Practices for Manure Utilization
Table 4: Land Application Requirements for 10-year, 10-day Storm Event J
Maximum pumping requirement( 16.09 A.F.),gallons 5,243,141
Total Nitrogen contained in liquid, lbs. 20,973 *Total-N= 4.0 lbs./1,000 gal
Ammonium-Nitrogen contained in liquid, lbs. 10,486 •NH4-N= 2.0 lbs./1,000 gal
Organic-Nitrogen contained in liquid,lbs. 10,486 Organic-N= 2.0 lbs./1,000 gal
Ammonium-Nitrogen available after irrigation,lbs. 5,767 45.0% Sprinkler irrigation loss'
Organic-Nitrogen available 3rd year,lbs. 4,404 42.00% Equilibrium mineralization rate for organic-N'
Nitrogen available to plants(PAN)yr.after yr.,lbs. 10,172
Soil Organic Matter, % 1.0
Irrigation Water NO3 content,ppm 5.0
Residual NO3 in soil, ppm 10.0 Pasture Corn Silage
Expected Yield(grain,Bu/acre;silage,tons/acre) 4 30 Based on CSU Extension
N req.w/listed O.M.,soil N,&In.Water NO3,(lb./acre) 113 134 Bulletin#538
Acres req.if effluent applied via sprinkler irrigation 90 76 1.5 A.F./Acre Irrigation water assumed
*Taken from CSU's Bulletin No.568A Best Management Practices for Manure Utilization
Table 5: Land Application Requirements for Average Years'Stormwater& Process Water I
Maximum pumping requirement( 84.00 A.F.),gallons 27,369,619
Total Nitrogen contained in liquid,lbs. 109,478 *Total-N= 4.0 lbs./1,000 gal
Ammonium-Nitrogen contained in liquid, lbs. 54,739 'NH,-N= 2.0 lbs./1,000 gal
Organic-Nitrogen contained in liquid,lbs. 54,739 Organic-N= 2.0 lbs./1,000 gal
Ammonium-Nitrogen available after irrigation, lbs. 30,107 45.0% Sprinkler irrigation loss*
Organic-Nitrogen available 3rd year,lbs. 22,990 42.00% Equilibrium mineralization rate for organic-N'
Nitrogen available to plants(PAN)yr.after yr.,lbs. 53,097
Soil Organic Matter, % 1.0
Irrigation Water NO3 content,ppm 5.0
Residual NO3 in soil, ppm 10.0 Pasture Corn Silage
Expected Yield(grain,Bu/acre;silage or grass,tons/acre) 4 30 Based on CSU Extension
N req.w/listed O.M.,soil N,& Irr.Water NO3,(lb./acre) 113 134 Bulletin#538
Acres req.if effluent applied via sprinkler irrigation 469 396 1.5 A.F./Acre Irrigation water assumed
'Taken from CSU's Bulletin No.568A Best Management Practices for Manure Utilization
Hello