The URL can be used to link to this page

Browse Search

Home My WebLink About20071374.tiff BEFORE THE FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION WASHINGTON,D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) SagamoreHill Broadcasting of ) Wyoming/Northern Colorado, LLC ) CSR-7132-A ) For Modification of the Television Market ) For KGWN-TV Cheyenne, Wyoming ) ) Facility Id. No. 63166 ) ) TO: Federal Communications Commission ) Chief, Media Bureau ) OPPOSITION OF CBS TELEVISION STATIONS INC. Howard F. Jaeckel 51 West 52nd Street New York,New York 10019 April 30, 2007 2007-1374 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page SUMMARY PRELIMINARY STATEMENT 1 BACKGROUND 5 ARGUMENT I. In the Circumstances Here Presented, The Commission Should Not Grant A Market Modification Tending To Undermine The Network/Affiliate System 7 II. Petitioner's Showing On The Criteria For Market Modification Does Not Warrant Granting The Petition 12 1. Petitioner Has Failed to Demonstrate a History of Carriage in Larimer and Weld Counties 13 2. Viewing of KGWN in the Subject Communities is Negligible, Both in Cable and Non-Cable Households 16 3. KGWN Holds No Advantage Over KCNC in the Strength of Signal Placed Over Larimer and Weld Counties 18 4. KGWN's News and Other Coverage of the Subject Communities Does Not Warrant Market Modification, Particularly in View of the Coverage Available From KCNC 21 III. The Petition Should Be Dismissed For Its Failure To Provide All The Information Required By The Commission's Rules 24 CONCLUSION 25 HFJ/64761 SUMMARY CBS Television Stations Inc. ("CBS"), licensee of KCNC-TV Denver, Colorado, opposes the Petition for Special Relief(the "Petition") filed by SagamoreHill Broadcasting of Wyoming/Northern Colorado, LLC ("Petitioner" or"Sagamore Hill") on behalf of KGWN-TV, Cheyenne, Wyoming. The Petition seeks to expand the television market of KGWN to include cable systems serving various communities in Larimer and Weld Counties, Colorado, which are part of the Denver DMA. Both KCNC and KGWN broadcast the programming of the CBS Television Network, on channels 4 and 5 respectively. Therefore, affording KGWN must carry rights on the subject cable systems would threaten substantial competitive harm to KCNC by requiring those systems to offer duplicative network programming on the channel position adjacent to that of KCNC-TV. The Commission has long expressed concern about granting market modification petitions that would be potentially disruptive of the network-affiliate system,particularly where the must-carry rights of the home market affiliate would be affected. While KCNC's ability to claim must-carry, should it choose to do so, might indeed be affected by the Commission's grant of the instant petition, CBS submits the Commission should look beyond this consideration in reviewing the impact of market modification on a home-market affiliate. Both the Commission's regulations and the Satellite Home Viewer Act recognize the importance to the network/affiliate system of maintaining an affiliate's exclusivity as the local outlet for network programming. This factor should therefore be weighed by the FCC against the strength of the petitioning station's showing under the statutory criteria for market modification. Especially when viewed from this perspective, it is clear that Sagamore Hill's showing in the instant case is wanting. -�- HFJ/64765 While Petitioner asserts that KGWN has been historically carried on cable systems serving the subject communities, its own data shows its record of carriage to be at best spotty; of the 35 communities named by Petitioner, KGWN was carried by cable systems during the 1990s in less than a third. Today, of all cable systems serving Larimer and Weld Counties, KGWN is carried only on those operated by US Cable, which reach a fraction of cable subscribers in those counties. Moreover, Petitioner provides no evidence that the systems that currently do not carry KGWN did so at some point in the past, and then decided to drop the station. Nor do existing viewing patterns support Petitioner's claim that Larimer and Weld Counties should be considered part of KGWN's market. Petitioner provides no specific data on viewing of KGWN in the subject communities. This is understandable, since Nielsen data shows that viewing of KGWN in the subject counties is negligible in both cable and non-cable households. KGWN places a strong signal over portions of the subject communities, and a Grade B signal over virtually all of Larimer and Weld Counties. Therefore,this is one basic criterion for market modification that KGWN meets. But where, as here, the petitioning station is seeking a Commission mandate compelling a cable system to carry its largely duplicative network programming -- in the process doing competitive harm to the home-market affiliate and perhaps even casting doubt on the home station's carriage on the system -- bare satisfaction of the statutory criteria should be only the beginning of the Commission's inquiry. In this case, KGWN's good technical coverage of the subject communities should not be entitled to significant weight, since that coverage is at least equaled by KCNC's. KGWN's news and other coverage of the subject communities does not warrant market modification, particularly in view of the coverage available from KCNC. KGWN's initiative in -ii- HFJ/64765 recently commencing a news broadcast devoted solely to Northern Colorado on its digital channel is entitled to little weight, since few viewers now have the receiving equipment necessary to view it over-the-air, and its carriage on cable systems would not presently be mandatory even if the instant petition were to be granted. And while CBS believes that KCNC's coverage of Northern Colorado is superior in quality and scope to that of KGWN, one thing certain: the FCC need not mandate cable carriage of KGWN in Larimer and Weld Counties to ensure that the needs of Northern Colorado for local news and information are met. Petitioner has failed to submit audience data as required by Section 76.59 of the Commission's rules. It has also failed to provide the coordinates of the headends of any cable systems other than those operated by Comcast,thus making it impossible for the Commission to determine the possible impact of granting the petition on KCNC's must- carry rights. Finally, while Petitioner has provided considerable data about population growth in Larimer and Weld Counties—all of which says nothing about the nexus between KGWN and the subject communities—it has provided no "data on shopping and labor patterns in the local market," beyond road maps showing that travel between Cheyenne and the subject communities is not difficult. Petitioner's failure to submit the basic evidence expressly required by the market modification rule also requires that the petition be denied. -111- HFJ/64765 BEFORE THE FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) SagamoreHill Broadcasting of ) Wyoming/Northern Colorado, LLC ) CSR- 7132-A ) For Modification of the Television Market ) for KGWN-TV Cheyenne, Wyoming ) ) Facility Id. No. 63166 ) TO: Federal Communications Commission Chief, Media Bureau OPPOSITION OF CBS TELEVISION STATIONS INC. PRELIMINARY STATEMENT CBS Television Stations Inc. ("CBS"), licensee of KCNC-TV Denver, Colorado, respectfully submits its opposition to the above-captioned Petition for Special Relief(the "Petition") filed by SagamoreHill Broadcasting of Wyoming/Northern Colorado, LLC ("Petitioner" or"Sagamore Hill") on behalf of KGWN-TV, Cheyenne, Wyoming. The Petition seeks to expand the television market of KGWN to include cable systems serving various communities in Larimer and Weld Counties, Colorado, which are part of the Denver DMA. Both KCNC and KGWN broadcast the programming of the CBS Television Network, on channels 4 and 5 respectively. Therefore, affording KGWN must carry rights on the subject cable systems would threaten substantial competitive harm to KCNC by requiring those systems to offer duplicative network programming on the channel position adjacent to that of KCNC-TV. The Commission has long expressed concern about granting market modification petitions that would be potentially disruptive of the network-affiliate system. Thus the Commission has stated: In any instance where a network affiliate attempts to encroach into another market the potential effect can be severe and must be taken into account. . [W]e are especially concerned . . . not [to] unduly upset the economic marketplace expectations underlying the affiliation concept.' To be sure,the Commission has sometimes granted market modification petitions by network affiliates notwithstanding this concern. But those cases all involved a set of circumstances not present here, including for example: (1)the fact that the home market station was substantially more distant from the cable systems in question than the station seeking market modification; (2)the fact that the communities in question were in the same state as the station seeking modification, whereas the home market affiliate was not; (3)the fact that the out-of-market affiliate, but not the home market station, was significantly viewed in the communities in question; and(4) the fact that ratings information showed a viewer preference for the out-of-market affiliate.2 Not only are these factors not present here, but Petitioner's showing on the basic statutory criteria for market modification falls short. Thus, while Petitioner asserts that KGWN has been historically carried on cable systems serving the subject communities, its own data shows its record of carriage to be at best spotty;of the 35 communities 1 Guy Gannett Communications, Inc., 15 FCC Rcd 10762, 10766 (internal quotation omitted). 2 See, discussion in note 22, infra. 2 named by Petitioner, KGWN was carried by cable systems during the 1990s in fewer than a third.3 Today, of all cable systems serving Larimer and Weld Counties, KGWN is carried only on those operated by US Cable, which reach a fraction of cable subscribers in those counties. Moreover, Petitioner provides no evidence that the systems that currently do not carry KGWN did so at some point in the past, and then decided to drop the station. Nor do existing viewing patterns support Petitioner's claim that Larimer and Weld Counties should be considered part of KGWN's market. Conceding in a footnote that"KGWN-TV's measurable ratings [in the counties] are . . . low,"4 Petitioner provides no specific data on viewing of KGWN in the subject communities. Petitioner's reticence on this subject is understandable: Nielsen data shows that viewing of KGWN in the subject counties is negligible -- in both cable and non-cable households -- and is dwarfed by KCNC's audience in those counties. With these factors weighing heavily against Sagamore Hill's effort to have the FCC mandate carriage of KGWN in Larimer and Weld Counties, Petitioner places heavy emphasis on its service to the subject communities. It appears that KGWN has, particularly in the last two years, provided some news and other programming relevant to those communities—although the Northern Colorado news program to which Petitioner gives such emphasis is broadcast as a digital program stream, and is therefore presently available only to the handful of viewers who own digital television sets, and would not be entitled to mandatory carriage in any case. But in the instant circumstances, where 3 Petition at Exhibit H-1. 4 Petition at note 89. 3 granting the petition would allow one network affiliate"to encroach into another market . [thus] upset[ing] the economic marketplace expectations underlying the affiliation concept,"the Commission should give particular weight to the statutory mandate that it consider"whether any other television station that is eligible to be carried by a cable system in such community . . . provides news coverage of issues of concern to such community."5 As we will show, KCNC-TV provides superior news coverage of the communities in question. Indeed, as will appear below,no less an authority than the president of Sagamore Hill has acknowledged that KGWN has neither the aspiration,nor the ability, to provide coverage of Northern Colorado equal to that provided by KCNC.6 As the legislative history of the 1992 Cable Television Competition and Consumer Protection Act makes clear,the primary concern of Congress in giving the Commission authority to expand a station's television market was to prevent consumers from "losing access to local stations because they are outside the [DMA] in which a local cable system operates." 7 It was not the Act's purpose to have the Commission assist television stations seeking to expand their economic markets by mandating their carriage on cable systems that had never carried the station, rather than letting such carriage be determined by competitive marketplace factors, such as the appeal of a station's programming to the system's subscribers. In this case, forcing cable systems to carry an out-of-market station broadcasting network programming largely duplicative of a local 5 47 U.S.C. § 534 (h) (1) (c) (ii). 6 See pages 6-7, infra. 7 H.R. Rep. 102-628, 102d Cong., 2d Sess. 97 (1992) (emphasis added). 4 network affiliate that it already carries -- and that local viewers clearly prefer--would do nothing to protect the interests of the systems' subscribers, but would rather constitute unwarranted government intervention to promote the economic interests of a television station for which those subscribers have evidenced no demand. BACKGROUND In its petition, Sagamore Hill claims that"KGWN-TV has been a fixture in Northern Colorado . . . for more than half a century." 8 According to press reports, however, KGWN's interest in Larimer and Weld Counties is of considerably more recent vintage. Thus, in its March 21, 2003 edition,the Northern Colorado Business Report noted that"Cheyenne television station KGWN Channel 5 has cast its eyes on Northern Colorado,with plans to gain viewers and advertisers in the growing markets of Larimer and Weld counties."9 In addition to approaching Northern Colorado cable systems to seek carriage, the article reported, KGWN had "started to include Fort Collins weather forecasts" in its nightly news programs, and joined local chambers of commerce. In addition, KGWN "hope[d] to open a satellite office in Northern Colorado"by the end of 2004. The article went on to describe in some detail the business strategy behind these moves: According to Nielsen Media Research, which monitors television ratings across the country, Cheyenne ranks No. 8 Petition at 9. 9 "Channel 5 zeros in on region,"Northern Colorado Business Report, March 21, 2003, page Al. 5 197 out of 210 television markets in the country with 51,840 television-owning households. . . .Nielsen includes Fort Collins, Greeley and Loveland in the Denver market, which ranks No. 18 and has 1,381,620 television households. [KGWN's general manager] said the station's ultimate goal is to redraw the Nielsen boundaries to bring Northern Colorado into the Cheyenne market. . . . If Cheyenne could absorb the Larimer and Weld county markets in its Nielsen boundaries, [the general manager] estimated the market ranking would catapult to "probably 120." Nielsen boundaries are significant because they allow a station to show advertisers how its programming rates in a certain territory. KGWN can currently claim viewers in Northern Colorado because of its broadcast signal, but it can't measure that viewing beyond anecdotal evidence. To date, most of KGWN's advertising sales in Northern Colorado target Cheyenne-area viewers who shop in Fort Collins, Greeley and Loveland. With more proof of Northern Colorado viewing, the station would have a greater lure for advertisers. KGWN's business strategy was further described in a May 27, 2004 e-mail message from Sagamore Hill's president, Louis Wall,to KCNC-TV's general manager, seeking his support for KGWN's efforts to win cable carriage in Larimer and Weld counties: Our goal is to sell advertising to guys who are in the newspaper, outdoor, direct mail and on radio. The rates there are commensurate with the population base, so we will be competitive and can get guys on TV,that could graduate to Denver economics. As an over-the-air station we are dedicated to Wyoming, we cannot go overboard on covering Northern Colorado....we get a lot of heat on this issue from our Wyoming viewers. So, our coverage HAS to be limited...but it can be enough to get us some ad dollars. If we can get 2-300k from Northern Colorado, that's a big 6 deal for us . . . .10 Petitioner's efforts to gain voluntary carriage for KGWN by cable operators met with some limited success. In 2005, it completed a carriage deal with US Cable, then reported to have about 5,000 subscribers in Larimer County." But it was unable to convince other local operators, accounting for the vast majority of cable subscribers in Larimer and Weld,that the value of KGWN to their customers merited the allocation of the required bandwidth to carry the station. We note, in this context, that it is in the obvious business interest of those operators to offer a channel lineup having maximum possible appeal to its existing and potential subscribers. With Petitioner having failed to win voluntary carriage, the instant petition followed. ARGUMENT I. IN THE CIRCUMSTANCES HERE PRESENTED,THE COMMISSION SHOULD NOT GRANT A MARKET MODIFICATION TENDING TO UNDERMINE THE NETWORK/AFFILIATE SYSTEM. Io E-mail Message dated May 27, 2004 from Louis Wall, President, SagamoreHill Broadcasting, to Walt DeHaven, Vice President and General Manager, KCNC-TV (emphasis in the original). (A copy of Mr. Wall's e-mail is attached hereto as Exhibit A.) To be clear, we do not suggest there is anything the least bit wrong with this business strategy or the means of its implementation—namely, to build an audience in Northern Colorado, in part through some local news coverage, in order to attract local advertisers. CBS and KCNC are in exactly the same business, and we believe we serve the public well in the process,with first rate news and entertainment programming. We cite Mr. Wall's e-mail only to place in perspective Petitioner's claims that KGWN's unique coverage of Northern Colorado warrants government intervention to help the station achieve its business goals. 11 See, "Cheyenne's Channel 5 inks cable deal,"Northern Colorado Business Report, October 14, 2005, page 1. 7 Both the FCC and the Congress have long recognized the importance to the network/affiliate system of limiting the extent to which multichannel video programming distributors ("MVPDs") may carry network programming from a distant station that competes with a local network affiliate's broadcast of the same programming in its own market. Thus the Commission has adopted the network non-duplication rules, which allow a local affiliate, with certain exceptions, to require cable systems within a specified radius of its community of license to black out duplicating,network programming on an affiliate it imports from another community.12 Similarly, the Satellite Home Viewer Act13 allows satellite carriers to provide an out-of-market network station only to subscribers unable to receive an over-the-air signal of Grade B intensity from a local affiliate of the same network. These regulations prohibit MVPDs from voluntarily carrying network programming from distant affiliates that they would otherwise wish to provide. It stands to reason, therefore, that in applying its standards for market modification, the Commission should act cautiously in requiring cable systems to carry such duplicating network programming. In fact, the Commission has acted with such caution,repeatedly stressing its concern with granting a market modification where the status of the home market affiliate might be undermined. 12 47 CFR § 76.92. 13 17USC § 119. 8 Thus, in Guy Gannett Communications, Inc.,14 the Commission declined to expand the market of WGME-TV, a CBS affiliate licensed to Portland, Maine,to include certain communities in New Hampshire that were a part of the Boston DMA. Despite finding WGME's showing to be sufficient on the four statutory factors governing market modification petitions,the Commission found the potential effect on the must carry rights of the CBS affiliate in the Boston market to be an overriding consideration warranting denial. Jeopardizing the in-market affiliate's must carry status,the Commission noted, would give rise to "a situation not intended or envisioned by the Cable Act."15 On reconsideration, the Commission affirmed its ruling, further emphasizing this point: In any instance where a network affiliate attempts to encroach into another market the potential effect can be severe and must be taken into account. . [W]e are especially concerned that our decision not unduly upset the economic marketplace expectations underlying the affiliation concept.16 Similar facts were presented in Pacific and Southern Company, Inc., 17 which also involved the efforts of a Portland network affiliate to expand its market to include certain New Hampshire communities in the Boston DMA. Once again,the Commission rejected the request, stating: 14 13 FCC Rcd 23470 (1998), recon. denied, 15 FCC Rcd 10762. 15 13 FCC Rcd at 23478. 16 15 FCC Rcd at 10766 (internal quotation omitted). 17 14 FCC Rcd 4558 (1999). 9 In light of. . . the potential danger to [the home market affiliate's] must carry status in more than a third of requested communities, we see no reason to interfere with the present affiliate relationship of the relevant [television markets] or change the status quo of the stations involved, despite the otherwise strong showing provided by [the out- of-market station].18 In the above cases, the Commission's concern was that granting a market modification petition might put the home-market station's must-carry rights at risk.. This is so because the Commission's rules exempt cable operators from having to carry duplicating affiliates of the same network,while at the same time prescribing that if only one is carried it must be the station whose community of license is closest to the system's principal headend. 19 Were the Commission to grant Sagamore Hill's petition here, KGWN's claim to must-carry rights would be superior to that of KCNC, at least on systems located in Larimer County.20 As shown by the attached Engineering Statement,the reference points of Cheyenne are 41.4 miles from the Comcast headend in Fort Collins, while the 18 Id. at 4566. 19 See, 47 CFR §§ 76.56 (b) (5), 76.56 (b) (4) (ii). 20 It is unclear to what extent the same would be true of the Weld County systems. Denver's reference points are two-tenths of a mile closer to the Comcast head-end in Greeley, as compared to those of Cheyenne. See, Engineering Statement of Joseph M. Davis, attached hereto as Exhibit B, at 1, Table 1. However, contrary to the requirement of Section 76.59 of the rules, see 47 CFR § 76.59 (b) (1), Petitioner has not provided the locations of any cable head-ends other than Comcast's in either Weld or Larimer counties. Given that Denver's reference points are marginally further from the reference points of the Greeley community than are Cheyenne's, it is impossible to say,without specific information as to the head-end locations of other cable systems serving Weld County, whether KGWN or KCNC would have the prevailing must-carry claim on those systems. 10 distance between that headend and Denver's reference points is 57.9 miles 21 On this ground alone, Sagamore Hill's petition should be denied as to the Larimer County systems 22 We respectfully submit, however,that in reviewing the impact of market modification on a home-market affiliate,the Commission should do more than consider whether that station's must-carry rights might be affected. As noted above, both the Commission's regulations and the Satellite Home Viewer Act recognize the importance to the network/affiliate system of maintaining an affiliate's exclusivity as the local outlet 21 Id. zz While the Commission has occasionally granted market modifications despite the potential impact on the home market affiliate,the facts of those cases were entirely unlike the ones presented here. For instance, in Young Broadcasting of Lansing, Inc., 18 FCC Rcd 24889 (Media Bureau 2003), of the six cable systems serving the county in question, only one did not carry the out-of-market affiliate, and the petitioning station had been carried on that system from 1983 to 2000 prior to being dropped; the home-market affiliate provided no local news, sports, weather, or community programming for residents of the cable communities; petitioner produced newspaper articles and letters from viewers expressing their unhappiness with the system's decision to cease carrying the station; and the petitioning station was significantly viewed in the county in question while the home-market affiliate was not. In Ackerley Media Group, Inc., 18 FCC Rcd 16199, 16204-05 (Media Bureau 2003), the home market station's city of license was more than twice as far from the relevant cable system as the community of the petitioning station, and in Seal Rock Broadcasters, LLC 18 FCC Rcd 16262, 16266 (2003),the distance was almost double. (Here, Cheyenne and Denver are essentially equidistant from the population centers of Loveland and Greely, while Fort Collins is only approximately 18 miles closer to Cheyenne than Denver. See, Exhibit B,Engineering Statement of Joseph M. Davis, at 1, Table 1.) Other examples include Brazos Broadcasting Company, 10 FCC Rcd 8759 (Cable Services Bureau 1995), where the petitioning's station's transmitter was located in the county at issue and its ratings outstripped those of the home-market affiliate, and Withers Broadcasting Company, 21 FCC Rcd 5909 (Media Bureau 2005), where the out-of-market affiliate had been continuously carried on the cable systems in question for approximately forty years, and the cable communities the station sought to include in its market were in its own state. 11 for network progranuning.23 This factor should therefore be weighed by the FCC against the strength of the petitioning station's showing under the statutory criteria for market modification. Especially when viewed from this perspective, it is clear that Sagamore Hill's showing in the instant case is wanting. II. PETITIONER'S SHOWING ON THE CRITERIA FOR MARKET MODIFICATION DOES NOT WARRANT GRANTING THE PETITION In the 1992 Cable Act, Congress directed that the FCC should take account of the following factors in considering petitions for market modification: (I) whether the station, or other stations located in the same area, have been historically carried on the cable system or systems within such community; (II) whether the television station provides coverage or other local service to such community; (III) whether any other television station that is eligible to be carried by a cable system in such community . . . provides news coverage of issues of concern to such community or provides carriage or coverage of sporting and other events of interest to the community; and (IV) evidence of viewing patterns in cable and noncable households within the areas served by the 23 We note in this connection that KGWN has invoked the Commission's network non-duplication rules to require cable systems within its exclusivity zone to black-out network programming on KCNC -- much to the displeasure of local residents. See, Chris George, "Residents Riled Over Channel 5 Monopoly," Wyoming Tribune-Eagle (Cheyenne) April 19, 2001, page Al. Despite numerous complaints from unhappy former viwers in Cheyenne, KCNC did not oppose KGWN's move, because it did not wish to infringe on the station's market exclusivity. See, Chris George, "KCNC Not Expected to Object to Local Blackout," Wyoming Tribune-Eagle (Cheyenne) May 8, 2001, page A4. 12 cable system or systems in such community.24 In the instant case,three of these four factors weigh heavily against expanding KGWN's market. 1. Petitioner Has Failed to Demonstrate a History of Carriage in Larimer and Weld Counties. This is not a case like the one presented by Young Broadcasting of Lansing, Inc.,25 in which the petitioning station sought to include in its market an area in which it was carried by all cable operators except one, by which it had been dropped after more than fifteen years of continuous carriage. Here, Petitioner's own data show that even during the 1990s,the vast majority of the systems serving Larimer and Weld Counties did not carry KGWN. Indeed, carriage was limited to only two operators, Fanch Communications (now Charter) and United Artists Entertainment.26 Presently,the situation is even more stark. Apart from US Cable of Coastal Texas, with which Sagamore Hill struck a deal in 2005, no other operator in Larimer and Weld Counties carries KGWN. And Petitioner provides no information as to which, if any, systems in the subject communities carried the station in the ten year period between 1995 and 2005. The following chart shows the extent of carriage of KGWN by the systems listed in the 2007 Television & Cable Factbook as serving Larimer and Weld Counties. Carriage information was cross-checked against local information available by zip code 24 47 U.S.C. § 534 (h) (1) (c) (ii). 25 18 FCC Rcd 24889 (Media Bureau 2003) 26 Petition at Exhibit H-1. 13 on the TV Guide Web Site, with discrepancies being resolved in favor of the presumably more recent information in TV Guide. CARRIAGE OF FULL POWER TELEVISION STATIONS IN THE CHEYENNE-SCOTTSBLUFF DMA ON CABLE SYSTEMS SERVING LARIMER AND WELD COUNTIES, COLORADO Cable MSO County Additional Subscribers KGWN- KDEV, ICLWY, KTNE-TV, KTUW-DT, system Communities TV, Cheyenne Cheyenne Aliance,NE Scottsbluff, served Cheyenne (ABC, (Fox, (PBS, NE (CBS, Channel Channel 40) Channel 13) (ND,channel Channel5) 11) 16) Estes Park, Orange Larimer 3,688 NO NO NO NO NO CO Broadband Fort Comcast Larimer 97,944 NO NO NO NO NO Collins,CO (Includes Fort Collins& Greeley) LaPorte, US Cable of Larimer Poudre Valley Not YES NO NO NO NO CO Coastal Texas Mobile Home available Park, Wellington. Longmont, Comcast Larimer, Berthoud, 97,944 NO NO NO NO NO CO Boulder, Campion, (Includes Weld Dacono,Erie, Fort Evanston, Collins& Firestone,Fort Greeley Lupton, Frederick, Hygiene, Lafayette, Larimer County, Louisville, Loveland, Superior. Loveland US Cable of Larimer Not YES NO NO NO NO (Columbine Coastal Texas available Mobile Home Park Denver Comcast Adams, Numerous 467,320 NO NO NO NO NO Suburbs Arapahoe, (includes Boulder, Denver) Broomfiel d,Clear Creek, Denver, Douglas, Elbert, Jefferson, Weld. Eaton,CO US Cable of Weld Ault,Nunn, N.A. YES I NO NO NO NO Coastal Texas Pierce. 14 Gilcrest US Cable of Weld Platteeville 526 NO NO NO NO NO Coastal Texas Greeley Comcast Weld Evans,Garden 18,729 NO NO NO NO NO City,La Salle, Weld County, Windsor Hudson Orange Weld Keenesberg Not NO NO NO NO NO Broadband available Keenesberg US Cable of Weld Not NO NO NO NO NO Coastal Texas available Johnstown US Cable of Weld Milliken YES NO NO NO NO Coastal Texas Kersey US Cable of Weld Not NO NO NO NO NO Coastal Texas available Mead K2 Weld NO NO NO NO NO Communicati ons Weld Champion NO NO NO NO NO County Broadband (River Valley Village Mobile Home Park) Sources: 2007 Television&Cable Factbook Cable Volume 1,at D195-D230(Warren Communications News 2007); htto://www.tvcuide.comilistinasidefault.aspx. In addition to the fact that only one operator carries KGWN in the subject communities (and not on all of its Weld county systems), it is notable that no other station in the Cheyenne-Scottsbluff DMA is carried by any cable system serving Northern Colorado. This would indeed be an oddity if the natural market of Cheyenne television stations really included Larimer and Weld Counties. Rather than a history of carriage, the available information indicates that Northern Colorado cable systems have overwhelmingly chosen not to carry Cheyenne television stations, including KGWN. The logical conclusion is that those stations have not been demanded by Northern Colorado cable customers. The Commission has repeatedly stated that a history of carriage on an area's cable systems "demonstrates that the relevant 15 cable subscribers value the station."27 But if that is the case, then it must be allowed that a long record of very limited carriage may demonstrate the converse. 2. Viewing of KGWN in the Subject Communities is Negligible, Both in Cable and Non-Cable Households. If the proof of the pudding is in the eating, then the test of whether a station has become an integral part of a community should be in the watching. That is why Congress directed the Commission to consider, in evaluating the merits of a market modification petition, "evidence of viewing patterns in cable and noncable households within the areas served by the cable system or systems in [the subject] community." Given the importance of this criterion, Petitioner's assiduous avoidance of the subject is striking. While asserting that"[1]ocal viewers in the Cable Communities turn to KGWN as a source of local programming,"28 it offers no evidence that they do so, beyond noting that KGWN is"significantly viewed" in Larimer County—which means only that, in 1972, the station met the rather minimal circulation standards necessary to be accorded that status.29 (In Weld County KGWN does not even meet the "significantly viewed" standard.30) Instead of providing audience data, Petitioner attempts to explain and discount KGWN's "low"ratings in a footnote, and then moves quickly to a discussion of the 27 See, e.g., News Press and Gazette, 10 FCC Rcd 10331, 10333 (1995);News Presss and Gazette, 10 FCC Red 10-327, 10329 (1995). 28 Petition at 23. 29 See, http://www.fcc.gov/mb/significantviewedstations.pdf. 30 Id. 16 percentage of KGWN's total advertising revenue that has been derived from Northern Colorado businesses over the last three years—a figure that ranges between 8.46%to 12.8%. 31 Petitioner's reticence concerning its audience in the subject communities is understandable, since it has almost no audience in Larimer and Weld counties, either in cable or non-cable households. The following table shows the average household audience of KWGN and KCNC in Weld and Larimer Counties during rating periods over the last ten years 32 Where Larimer or Weld County figures are not reported for KGWN, it is because a minimum 0.5 HH share is required by Nielsen for reporting. WELD COUNTY DENVER y,DMA { �..�ir.,.., ttc. _ 5 c.i_�.i$GW t 1ti `aA.�i m i ...... IMIONVitigg Cable Non-Cable Cable Non-Cable TV HH CABLE % 1997 982 1,178 NA NA 54,310 54% (MAY,JULY, NOV 1996;FEB 1997) 1998 1,230 1,459 NA NA 55,370 52% (MAY,JULY, NOV 1997;FEB 1998) 1999 1,529 1,230 NA NA 57,480 58% (MAY,JULY, NOV 1998;FEB 1999) 2000 2001 2002 1,230 601 NA NA 69,220 63% (MAY,JULY, NOV 2001;FEB 2002) 2003 1,415 1,010 NA NA 67,360 54% (MAY,JULY, NOV 2002;FEB 2003) 2004 1,399 1,239 NA NA 72,730 50% (MAY,JULY, NOV 2003;FEB 2004) 2005 1,262 1,205 NA NA 75,540 48% (MAY,JULY, NOV 2004;FEB 2005) 2006 1,260 1,237 0 41 78,680 50% (MAY,JULY,NOV 2005;FEB 2006) 31 Petition at 24. 32 Data for 2000 and 2001 was not available. 17 LARIMER COUNTY DENVER(( DMA �+ �y� 'n • fk M�i+<µ� I 59.. . t kHiil r ..0N;l\#1M„111 Cable Non-Cable Cable Non-Cable TV HH CABLE % 1997 1,924 1,664 46 12 84,040 68% (MAY,JULY, NOV 1996;FEB 1997) 1998 2,510 1,213 8 30 85,200 72% (MAY,JULY,NOV 1997;FEB 1998) 1999 2,227 791 0 58 86,710 71% (MAY,JULY,NOV 1998; FEB 1999) 2000 2001 2002 1,795 698 0 72 98,420 66% (MAY,JULY,NOV 2001;FEB 2002) 2003 2,303 969 NA NA 101,170 65% (MAY,JULY, NOV 2002;FEB 2003) 2004 2,131 1,037 NA NA 103,350 64% (MAY,JULY, NOV 2003;FEB 2004) 2005 1,997 1,266 NA NA 102,370 60% (MAY,JULY, NOV 2004;FEB 2005) 2006 2,016 948 NA NA 102,400 59% (MAY,JULY,NOV 2005;FEB 2006) Source: Nielsen; County Coverage Study; County Summary M-Su 7A-1A Moreover, during the last five years the annual DMA review that Nielsen uses to make market assignments has consistently shown that KGWN's audience in Larimer and Weld counties amounts at most to a fraction of a share point.33 A station that petitions for market modification when its audience in the subject communities is so negligible is not seeking to have its natural market recognized, but is rather trying to enlist the Commission and the mandatory carriage rules in support of its efforts to create a new one. We respectfully submit that this is not what Congress had in mind when it enacted the market modification provision. 3. KGWN Holds No Advantage Over KCNC in the Strength of Signal Placed Over Larimer and Weld Counties KGWN places a strong signal over portions of the subject communities, and a Grade B signal over virtually all of Larimer and Weld Counties. Therefore, this is one basic criterion for market modification that KGWN meets. 33 See, Exhibit C, attached hereto. 18 But where, as here,the petitioning station is seeking a Commission mandate compelling a cable system to carry its largely duplicative network programming -- in the process doing competitive harm to the home-market affiliate and perhaps even casting doubt on the home station's carriage on the system -- bare satisfaction of the statutory criteria should be only the beginning of the Commission's inquiry. In this case, KGWN's good technical coverage of the subject communities should not be entitled to significant weight, since that coverage is at least equaled by KCNC's. As shown by the Engineering Statement of Joseph M. Davis (attached as Exhibit B),the percentages of Larimer County residents that KCNC-TV and KGWN-TV serve with City Grade, Grade A and Grade B signal coverage are very nearly the same,with KGWN having a slight advantage with respect to City Grade and Grade A coverage. In Weld County, however, KCNC reaches a significantly greater percentage of the population with a City Grade and Grade A signal. Thus KCNC provides City Grade coverage to approximately 114,059 residents of Weld County (63.04 percent of the population), while KGWN reaches only 19,813 persons with this quality signal (or 10.95 percent of the population). Similarly, KCNC is able to offer Grade A coverage to 68.7 percent of Weld County residents (124,306 people), as compared to just over half for KGWN (93,948 persons). The figures from Table 2 of the Engineering Statement are reproduced below: 19 Table 2: Population Coverage Summary Larimer County,CO Weld County,CO (Total County population (Total County population 251,494) 180,936) Signal Level KGWN-TV KCNC-TV KGWN-TV KCNC-TV City Grade Longley-Rice coverage (>74 Db) 19,813 114,059 Population covered 191,717 182,193 10.95% 63.04% Percent of total county population 76.23% 72.44% Grade A Longley-Rice coverage (>68 dBµ) Population covered 203,847 195,551 93,948 124,306 Percent of total county population 81.05% 77.76% 51.92% 68.70% Grade B Longley-Rice coverage (>47 dBµ) 180,642 180,650 Population covered 234,806 235,805 Percent of total county population 93.36% 93.76% 99.84% 99.84% The signal strengths placed by each station at the reference points of the major population centers in the two counties are likewise similar, as shown by Table 3 of the Engineering Statement. 20 Table 3: Longley-Rice Signal Strength Facility Longley-Rice Signal Level(dBµ)At City Reference Points Fort Collins,CO Loveland, CO Greeley, CO KGWN-TV analog Ch. 5 80.4 76.1 71.6 KCNC-TV analog Ch.4 71.5 81.8 58.2 It is clear, then, that the technical coverage of KCNC and KGWN of the counties in question is essentially equal. In these circumstances, the fact that KGWN provides a good signal to the subject communities should be accorded relatively little weight. 4. KGWN's News and Other Coverage of the Subject Communities Does Not Warrant Market Modification, Particularly in View of the Coverage Available From KCNC. CBS does not dispute that KGWN provides some news coverage of Northern Colorado, although its claim to be the"first local broadcast voice"34 for the region must be taken with a grain of salt,particularly in light of the admission of Sagamore Hill's president that"[KGWN] cannot go overboard on covering Northern Colorado"because that would result in"a lot of heat . . . from our Wyoming viewers." 35 Nor do we disparage KGWN's initiative in recently commencing a news broadcast devoted solely to Northern Colorado on its digital channel, although the present significance that may be given that program is limited, since few viewers have the receiving equipment necessary 34 Petition at 12. 3s See discussion at pages 6-7,supra. 21 to view it over-the-air, and its carriage on cable systems would not now be mandatory even if the instant petition were to be granted. But while petitioner claims long service to Northern Colorado, having opened a news bureau in Fort Collins in 2005,36 KCNC has had a bureau in Fort Collins since 1981. The bureau is staffed by a full time reporter and photographer, and serves as a base for other KCNC news crews that are often assigned to cover stories in the region on a given day. The quantity of KCNC's coverage of the region is documented in the logs of its Northern Colorado Bureau going back to August 2000, which are attached as Exhibit D. A few examples of the quality of that coverage will suffice. According to the Larimer County Web Site, the county is the most hazardous. . in Colorado for wildfire[s] . . . [and] the potential of wildfire[s] to burn structures and threaten lives in the County is high and will only continue to grow." KCNC has responded to this issue with extensive news coverage, telling residents what areas are in danger, who needs to evacuate, where evacuees can get help, and how KCNC viewers can help people affected by a fire. The station's news reports include maps,phone numbers for shelters, and specific fire weather forecasts. For example, the Bobcat Gulch fire in July 2000 burned 10,600 acres and destroyed 22 structures, mostly homes. Within hours after the fire started, KCNC had several crews on the story. The crew staffing the Northern Colorado Bureau found back roads to a ridgeline with a clear view of the fire's advance, and which direction the wind was pushing it. Those images, coupled with reports from the station's helicopter, gave 36 See, Tom Hacker, "KGWN Opens Northern Colorado Bureau,"Northern Colorado Business Report, August 5, 2005,page 1. 22 residents crucial information about the path of what became the biggest fire in the history of the Roosevelt National Forest. In the following days, KCNC relayed evacuation information, shelter locations, and reports concerning the progress of the firefighting effort. Mother example of KCNC's focus on issues of the most urgent concern to Northern Colorado residents is flooding. Each June, melting snow in the high country brings the threat of flooding at lower elevations. Summer thunderstorms also cause flooding. In Northern Colorado, the Cache la Poudre River flows through Fort Collins and the Big Thompson River flows through Loveland. Both rivers meet in Greeley at the confluence with the South Platte River. Feeding these three rivers, there are an extraordinary number of smaller tributaries that are prone to flooding. KCNC combines experienced weathercasting with information from field crews and eyewitness accounts to determine where water is rising. Viewers of KCNC in Northern Colorado use this information to protect their homes, businesses, and personal safety. An example of KCNC's reporting on these emergencies is its coverage of a summertime downpour that turned into a deadly flood on July 28, 1997. Ten inches of rain fell in five-and-a-half hours, with the resultant flooding killing five people and injuring another 40. On the campus of Colorado State University, the flood caused$20 million in damage. KCNC provided shelter information, flood maps, ways for people to donate assistance and money, and ongoing follow-up coverage of efforts in Fort Collins to prevent similar devastation in the future. West Nile Virus has also been an issue of concern in Northern Colorado. In 2003, there were more than 3,000 cases of West Nile in Colorado, which killed 63 people. 23 KCNC has responded by producing numerous reports detailing the spread of the disease, particularly in Larimer and Weld Counties,which were among the hardest hit. These reports have detailed how residents can protect themselves from the mosquito bites which spread the virus. Ongoing coverage has reported on topics including the movement of virus, reducing mosquito populations, mosquito surveillance programs, and concerns about risks of urban mosquito spraying. These are only a few examples of KCNC's coverage of issues of particular concern to Northern Colorado. Others may be found in the coverage summaries that are attached as Exhibit E. Not surprisingly, CBS believes KCNC's coverage of Northern Colorado is superior in quality and scope to that of KGWN. One thing, however, is certain: the FCC need not mandate cable carriage of KGWN in Larimer and Weld Counties to ensure that the needs of Northern Colorado for local news and information are met. III. THE PETITION SHOULD BE DISMISSED FOR ITS FAILURE TO PROVIDE ALL THE INFORMATION REQUIRED BY THE COMMISSION'S RULES. Section 76.59 of the Commission's rules expressly provides that "requests for modification of a television market . . . shall include the following evidence: (1)A map or maps illustrating the relevant community locations and geographic features, station transmitter sites, [and] cable system headend locations . . . . (3) Available data on shopping and labor patterns in the local market. . . . 24 (6)Published audience data for the relevant station showing its average all day audience (i.e.,the reported audience averaged over Sunday-Saturday, 7 a.m.-1 a.m., or an equivalent time period) for both cable and noncable households or other specific audience indicia, such as station advertising and sales data or viewer contribution records. . . . Petitions for Special Relief to modify television markets that do not include such evidence shall be dismissed . . . 37 We have already noted Petitioner's failure to provide available audience data as required by the rule. It has also failed to provide the coordinates of the headends of any cable systems other than those operated by Comcast,thus making it impossible for the Commission to determine the possible impact of granting the petition on KCNC's must- carry rights. Finally, while Petitioner has provided considerable data about population growth in Larimer and Weld Counties—all of which says nothing about the nexus between KGWN and the subject communities—it has provided no "data on shopping and labor patterns in the local market,"beyond road maps showing that travel between Cheyenne and the subject communities is not difficult. Petitioner's failure to meet the basic requirements of the market modification rule also requires that the petition be denied. CONCLUSION There is nothing wrong with any business trying to expand its market. The market modification rule, however, was not intended—and should not be used—as a 37 47 CFR § 76.59 (emphasis added). 25 means of enlisting government support for such private objectives. The petition should be denied. Respectfully submitted, CBS TELEVISION STATION INC. By: tan? r Howard F. eckel Its Attorney 51 West 52"d Street New York,New York 10019 April 30, 2007 26 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, Howard F. Jaeckel, hereby certify that on this 30th day of April 2007, I caused copies of the foregoing "Opposition of CBS Television Stations Inc."to be mailed via first-class postage prepaid mail to the following: g(L-015: Howar F. aeckel Mace J. Rosenstein Comcast of Longmont Covington& Burling LLP 434 Kimbark Street 1201 Pennsylvania Avenue,NW Longmont, CO 80501-5526 Washington, DC 20004-2401 Comcast Comcast of Fort Collins/Greeley 1500 Market Street-35t' Floor 3737 W 10th Street Philadelphia, PA 19102 Greeley, CO 80634-1818 Champion Cable LLC Galaxy Cable, Inc. 380 Perry Street Fl 4, 1 First National Plaza Castle Rock, CO 80104 Sikeston, MO 63801-3012 K2 Communications LLC K2 Communications LLC P.O. Box 232 1447 Lombardi Street Mead, CO 80542 Erie, CO 80516 Orange Broadband Operating Company, LLC Lago Vista MHP 14120 Ballantyne Corporate Place 420 E 57th Street Charlotte,NC 28277 Loveland, CO 80538-1214 US Cable of Coastal-Texas LP US Cable of Coastal-Texas LP 28 West Grand Avenue 14700 W 66th Place Montvale,NJ 07645 Arvada, CO 80004-5928 Ault, Town of Hudson, Town of Town Clerk's Office Town Clerk's Office 201 1st Street 557 Ash Street Ault, CO 80610 Hudson, CO 80642 Berthoud, Town of Johnstown, Town of Town Clerk's Office Town Clerk's Office 318 Nebraska Avenue 101 Charlotte Street Berthoud, CO 80514 Johnstown, CO 80534 Dacono, Town of Keenesburg, City of Town Clerk's Office City Clerk's Office 512 Cherry Avenue 140 S. Main Street Dacono, CO 80514 Keenesburg, CO 80643 Eaton, Town of Kersey, Town of Town Clerk's Office Town Clerk's Office 223 P' Street 332 3`d Street Eaton, CO 80615 Kersey, CO 80644 Estes Park, Town of LaSalle, Town of Town Clerk's Office Town Clerk's Office 170 Macgregor Avenue 128 N 2"d Street Estes Park, CO 80517 LaSalle, CO 80645 Evans, City of Lochbuie, Town of City Clerk's Office Town Clerk's Office 1100 37th Street 703 County Road 37 Evans, CO 80620 Brighton, CO 80603 Firestone, Town of/Evanston Loveland, City of Town Clerk's Office City Clerk's Office 151 Grant Avenue 500 E 3`d Street Firestone, CO 80520 Loveland, CO 80537 Fort Collins, City of Mead, Township of City Clerk's Office Township Clerk's Office 300 Laporte Avenue 441 3`d Street Fort Collins, CO 80521 Mead, CO 80542 Fort Lupton, Town of Milliken, Town of Town Clerk's Office Town Clerk's Office 130 S Mckinley Avenue 1101 Broad Street Fort Lupton, CO 80621 Milliken, CO 80543 Frederick, Town of Pierce, Town of Town Clerk's Office Town Clerk's Office 401 Locust Street 240 W Main Street Frederick, CO 80530 Pierce, CO 80650 Garden City, Town of Platteville, Town of Town Clerk's Office Town Clerk's Office 621 27th Street Rd 400 Grand Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Platteville, CO 80651 Gilcrest, Town of Wellington, Town of Town Clerk's Office Town Clerk's Office 304 8th Street 3735 Cleveland Avenue Gilcrest, CO 80623 Wellington, CO 80549 Greeley, City of Windsor, Town of City Clerk's Office Town Clerk's Office 1000 10th Street 301 Walnut Street Greeley, CO 80631 Windsor, CO 80550 Weld County Larimer County County Clerk's Office County Clerk's Office 4209 County Road 24'/2 205 E 6th Street Longmont, CO 80504 Loveland, CO 80537 Weld County ICRMA-TV County Clerk's Office James Morgese 330 Park Avenue President & General Manager Fort Lupton, CO 80621 1089 Bannock Street Denver, CO 80204 KPXC-TV KDVR Mark Cometta, General Manager& General Bill Schneider Sales Manager Vice President& General Manager 3001 S. Jamaica Court, Suite 200 501 Wazee Street Aurora, CO 80014-2627 Denver, CO 80208 KUSA-TV KMGH Roger Ogden, President & General Manager Darrell Brown, General Manager 500 Speer Blvd. 123 Speer Blvd. Denver, CO 80203 Denver, CO 80203 KBDI-TV KTVD Willard Rolland, President& General Manager Greg Armstrong, Vice President& 2900 Welton Street, First Floor General Manager Denver, CO 80205 11203 E. Peakview Avenue Centennial, CO 80111 KCEC ICDEN Maria Carrera, General Manager Dirk Freeman, General Manager 777 Grant Street, 5th Floor 1601 S. Pearl Street Denver, CO 80203 Denver, CO 80210 KWGN-TV Jim Zerwekh, Vice President& General Manger 6160 S. Wabash Way Greenwood Village, CO 80111 EXHIBIT A Page 1 of 2 Holmes, Wendy From: DeHaven, Walt F Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2004 9:15 AM To: louisshb@bellsouth.net Subject: RE:An idea... Louis,Sorry for the delay but the May sweep has been all consuming.We went back and took a look at meter patems for these counties for the past three years and they are all over the board geographically.With this in mind,we just can't find a way to help with your request without potentially hurting ourselves.We will gladly help you in all other projects which we dicussed.l will be in Vegas next week and will carve out some time if you would like to talk further. Waft : louisshb@bellsouth.net[mailto:louisshb@bellsouth.net] Sent:Thursday,May 13,2004 4:22 PM To:wfdehaven@cbs.com Subject:An idea... Walt: Some thoughts as you consider our proposal on Northern Colorado. I sincerely appreciate you giving this consideration and I wanted to point out some things that may give you some comfort if you can find a way to work with us. 1. Larimer and Weld counties are two of the largest counties in Colorado, they extend practically from the Denver burbs to the Wyoming State Line. Hopefully the meters mirror the population base which places most of those meters closer to Denver. 2. Without question our interest is in the most northern parts of those two counties. We have no interest in anything that is south of Fort Collins. 3. We do not have to be EVEN CLOSE to your channel position. If you are on Channel 5....45 is ok with us. No one is going looking for CBS on Channel 45. 4. Consider this....as we all know the proponderence of viewing is to the Denver over-the- air channels. If viewers are on ch.'s 5,6,7 and the like, to think they would jump all the way over to Ch. 45 for CBS is a huge stretch of the imagination. 5. Our goal is to sell advertising to guys who are in the newspaper, outdoor, direct mall and on radio. The rates there are commensurate with the population base, so we will be competitive and can get guys on TV, that could graduate to Denver economics. 6. As an over-the-air station we are dedicated to Wyoming, we cannot go overboard on covering Northern Colorado....we get a lot of heat on this issue from our Wyoming viewers. So, our coverage HAS to be limited...but it can be enough to get us some ad dollars. If we can get 2-300k from Northern Colorado, that's a big deal for us....and not enough to make a dent in that 10M in developmental needed next year for you guys. 7. We will run promotion of Your News on KGWN. There is huge viewing to Denver in Wyoming as you know....so we don't mind doing our part even though that goes against conventional wisdom. Page 2 of 2 8. We will help YOU sell advertising in Northern Colorado on KCNC. We will be glad to distribute sales information and sales programs from KCNC and you can just give our sales guy a bird dog fee. 9. We are open to anything that you may like that can give us an opportunity to sell advertising in Northern Colorado. 10. Cheyenne Is the 196th market....our production values, both for our news and even our rebroadcast of CBS, Is not KCNC quality. Remember this Network Non-Duplication is not a, "forever thing." If KGWN shows evidence that it is hurting your ratings you can always change your mind and ask it to be enforced. I trust that you find (or found) that the meters for those Northern Colorado zip codes is closer to 4% than 18-20%....I sure hope so. Anyway....Walt ...thanks....if there is a way we can work together on this, all of us at KGWN would be so appreciative. I will call you on Friday. louts Louis Wail SagamoreHill Broadcasting LLC 3825 Inverness Way Augusta, GA 30907 706.855.8506 fax 706.855.8747 847.722.4998 Cell Louis5HB8BeliSouth.net EXHIBIT B SIFI/6476I Chesapeake RF Consultants,LLC RadInfrequency Car.ubng Engineers olgltal Tele.INan and Radio Enaineerina Statement prepared for CBS Television, Inc. This statement has been prepared on behalf of CBS Television, Inc. ("CBS") in support of CBS's opposition to a Petition for Special Relief for SagamoreHill Broadcasting of Wyoming/Northern Colorado, LLC ("SagamoreHill'). SagamoreHill is licensee of KGWN-TV (facility ID 63166, analog Ch. 5, digital Ch. 30, Cheyenne, WY) and the subject petition seeks to modify the KGWN-TV television market to include certain cable communities in Larimer and Weld Counties,both Colorado. CBS is the licensee of KCNC-TV(facility ID 47903,analog Ch.4,digital Ch.35,Denver,CO),which carries CBS television network programming as does KGWN-TV. The instant statement and associated exhibits provide distance and predicted coverage data to support CBS'opposition. Table 1, below, summarizes the distances from the reference points for Denver and Cheyenne to the reference points for the cable communities and the associated cable receiving locations discussed in SagamoreHill's petition. Table 1: Distance Computation Summary Cable Headends and From Denver Reference Point From Cheyenne Reference Point Community Reference Points Distance Distance Azimuth Distance Distance Azimuth (km) (miles) (`T) _ (km) Comcast Fort Collins Headend 93.1 57.9 354.1 66.6 41.4 200.9 Comcast Greeley Headend 78.8 49.0 15.3 79.2 49.2 175.2 Fort Collins,CO Reference Point 94.3 58.6 354.9 64.9 40.4 200.3 Greeley,CO Reference Point 79.5 49.4 17.1 79.4 49.3 173.4 Loveland,CO Reference Point 73.5 45.7 354.0 84.6 52.6 195.0 Coverage predictions for the analog KGWN-TV facility (BLCT-1639)are supplied on the attached Figure 1 based on the terrain-dependent Longley-Rice methodology I. The map also 'See Order on Reconsideration in CS Docket 95-178(16 FCC Rcd 5022),which encourages parties in market modification proceedings to provide maps using the Longley-Rice methodology. The Longley-Rice computer program input data includes a location variability of 50%,a time variability of 50%,a situation variability of 50%,horizontal polarization,0.005 Sim conductivity,a climate constant of 15,an assumption of continental temperate climate zone,a receive antenna height of 10 meters,a terrain profile step size of 0.1 kin and a grid cell size of 0.5 km. No"clutter" factor was employed. A sample ofthe calculations performed are discussed in the 1995 booklet released by the National Chesapeake RF Consuian LLC Engineering Statement Rae Comm DOM TeNIWbn and Radio Television, Inc (page 2 of 3) depicts the locations of the KGWN-TV transmitter, the KGWN-TV Grade B(47 dBµ) coverage contour,2 the cable system headend locations, and various community reference point locations including those of Fort Collins, Greeley, and Loveland. A similar map is provided as Figure 2 which supplies predicted coverage for the analog KCNC-TV facility (BLCT-510). Detailed population counts(2000 census)were extracted from the Longley-Rice coverage determinations for the counties of Larimer and Weld. A comparison for each facility is provided in Table 2 below. Table 2: Population Coverage Summary Larimer County,CO Weld County,CO (Total County population (Total County population 251,494) 180,936) Signal Level KGWN-TV KCNC-TV KGWN-TV KCNC-1V City Grade Longley-Rke coverage(>74 dep) Population covered 191,717 182,193 19,813 114,059 Percent of total county Population 76.23% 72.44% 10.95% 63.04% Grade A Longley-Rke coverage(>68 dBy) Population covered 203,847 195,551 93,948 124,306 Percent of total county population 81.05% 77.76% 51.92% 68.70% Grade B Longley-Rke coverage(>47 dBy) Population covered 234,806 235,805 180,642 180,650 Percent of total countypopulation 93.36% 93.76% _ 99.84% 99.84% A comparison of the Longley-Rice predicted signal levels at the reference points for each community and cable system receiving location is provided in the following Table 3. Table 3: Longley-Rice Signal Strength Longley-Rice Signal Level (dBN)At City Reference Points Fadlity Fort Collins,CO Loveland,CO Greeley,CO KGWN-TV analog Ch. 5 80.4 76.1 71.6 KCNC-TV analog Ch. 4 75.5 81.8 58.2 Telecommunications and Information Administration:George Hufford, The ITN Irregular Terrain Model,version 1.2.2- The Algorithm and the associated booklet-The Irregular Terrain Model,January 26, 1999. Digitized NED 3 arc-second twain data were employed. 2 Contour distances were predicted using the standard method specified by the Commission in§73.684 utilizing z_e.r cecond digitized terrain data and the F(50,50)curves for Lo-Band VHF television in§73.699. Via` Chesapeake RF Consultants,LLC Engineering Statement eeE&aheeKY Consulting Engineers Digit&Telewwn and Paea CBS Television, Inc (Page 3 of 3) Certification The undersigned hereby certifies that the foregoing statement was prepared by him or under his direction, and that it is true and correct to the best of his knowledge and belief. N \(-O4 ,2 K . Joseph M. Davis,P.E. April 27,2007 Chesapeake RF Consultants, LLC 11993 Kahns Road Manassas, VA 20112 703-650-9600 List of Attachments Figure 1 KGWN-TV Predicted Longley-Rice Coverage Figure 2 KCNC-TV Predicted Longley-Rice Coverage • E E 2 a� c9d�u c e ‘.1t Ii ; = 4I N I N 4 3 1 10 VI c a CL 3 _ 3v w • ,p .: , , , _ ,. S . Is. . . . . .. . . „,, , , , . A., , , , ,,; ._ . . •,. ,. .,.. .c. -.A .. ' le : 1 • " E ;. tit l .'j // ` _ Aat, ii ii 41 ' 1 r [ r - Ill L was•< , r :( ;fife' T IS ftNA V Se 1,_ .4 y ;"1.. ' G ` C sIf P 6 re m ryryc , a'i m l ~A pp}+ W i ._ C n Y V 17L5 2 y m _ R o o g it f st ai or E an C n c x Q V `.g 4 & - ono, u I I p q r- v tij X6c 8 . v E" In i !.r". -- - ^ctitri E r q �Yv MJji#i?ai J/" al + Jrr5 iTF mi ( { .a l s..76 tLI 9 _ S V 1 q O mp CJSZ to c ;.%�. • p O 1 & n a a e i" R : Onni EXHIBIT C Fffl/64761 DMA REVIEW 07-08 VIEWING SHARES FOR LARIMER COUNTY, CO DMA With Reported Viewing Station Share Lincoln & Hastings-Krny 0.0 KWNB 0.0 KPNE 0.0 Denver 47.8 KWGN 3.1 KMGH 8.5 KTVD 2.1 KRMA 1.4 KUSA 13.8 KCNC 12.1 KDVR 4.6 KCEC 0.3 KFCT 0.4 KBDI 0.6 KPXC 0.3 KTFD 0.0 ALT 0.5 KRMT 0.0 KWHD 0.0 Colorado Springs-Pueblo 0.0 KXRM 0.0 Cheyenne-Scottsbluff 0.1 KLWY 0.0 KGWN 0.1 Rapid City 0.0 KIVV 0.0 KDUH 0.0 Grand Junction-Montrose 0.0 KFQX 0.0 Albuquerque-Santa Fe 0.1 KOAT 0.1 KOB 0.0 Los Angeles 0.0 KCBS 0.0 • DMA REVIEW 07-08. VIEWING SHARES FOR LARIMER COUNTY, CO DMA With Reported Viewing Station Share Cable Origination and Pay Cable 50.7 Non-DMA Area 1.2 (Includes Homeless. Stations and LPTV Stations. ) DMA REVIEW 07-08 VIEWING SHARES FOR WELD COUNTY, CO DMA With Reported Viewing Station Share 50.1 Denver KMGH 9.4 KUSA 12.3 KRMA 2.1 ALT 0.4 KCNC 11.6 KDVR 5.2 KTVD 1.7 KBDI 0.7 KRMT 0.0 KWGN 2.6 KPXC 0.3 KFCT 0.2 KCEC 2.8 KTFD 0.7 KZCO 0.1 Colorado Springs-Pueblo 0.0 KXRM 0.0 Cheyenne-Scottsbluff 0.2 KGWN 0.1 KLWY 0.0 Los Angeles 0.0 KTLA 0.0 Cable Origination and Pay Cable 48.1 Non-DMA Area 1. 6 (Includes Homeless Stations and LPTV Stations. ) DMA REVIEW 06-07 VIEWING SHARES FOR LARIMER COUNTY, CO DMA With Reported Viewing Station Share New York 0.2 WNBC 0.2 WABC 0.0 WCBS - 0.0 Lincoln & Hastings-Krny 0.0 KWNB 0.0 Sioux Falls (Mitchell) 0.0 KPRY 0.0 North Platte 0.0 KNOP 0.0 58.6 Denver. KDVR 5.0 KFCT 0.8 KTVD 2.2 KCEC 0.7 KCNC 12.4 KUSA 17.2 KWGN 3.1 KRMA 2.0 KMGH 13.3 KBDI 0.8 KPXC 0.3 ALT 0.4 KWHD 0.0 KRMT 0.1 KTFD 0.2 Colorado Springs-Pueblo 0.0 KOAA 0.0 Cheyenne-Scottsbluff 0. 1 KLWY 0.0 KGWN 0.0 DMA REVIEW 06-07 VIEWING SHARES FOR LARIMER COUNTY, CO DMA With Reported Viewing Station Share Rapid City 0.0 KIVV 0.0 Grand Junction-Montrose 0.0 KKCO 0.0 Los Angeles 0.0 KTLA 0.0 KABC 0.0 Cable Origination and Pay Cable 40.0 Non-DMA Area 1.1 (Includes Homeless Stations and LPTV Stations. ) • DMA REVIEW 06-07 VIEWING SHARES FOR WELD COUNTY, CO DMA With Reported Viewing Station Share New York 0.0 WABC 0.0 Lincoln & Hastings-Krny 0.0 KPNE 0.0 Sioux Falls(Mitchell) 0.0 KPLO 0.0 Denver 56.5 KUSA 17.6 KCNC 10.7 ALT 0.8 KRMA 1.9 KBDI 1.0 KMGH 11.5 KDVR 4.0 KTVD 2.1 KWGN 3.1 KTFD 0.3 KCEC 2.4 KPXC 0.3 KFCT 0.5 KRMT 0.1 KWHD 0.0 Colorado Springs-Pueblo 0.0 KXRM 0.0 Cheyenne-Scottsbluff 0.3 KGWN 0.2 KLWY 0. 1 Rapid City 0.0 KDUH 0.0 Casper-Riverton 0.0 KCWC 0.0 DMA REVIEW 06-07 VIEWING SHARES FOR WELD COUNTY, CO DMA With Reported Viewing Station Share Grand Junction-Montrose 0.0 KKCO 0.0 KFQX 0.0 Los Angeles 0.0 KCBS 0.0 KABC 0.0 Cable Origination and Pay Cable 42.2 Non-DMA Area 1.0 (Includes Homeless Stations and LPTV Stations. ) DMA REVIEW 05-06 VIEWING SHARES FOR LARIMER COUNTY, CO DMA With Reported Viewing Station Share New York 0.0 WNBC 0.0 WCBS 0.0 WABC 0.0 Lincoln & Hastings-Krny 0.0 KWNB 0.0 Sioux Falls (Mitchell) 0.0 KPLO 0.0 56.1 Denver KUSA 17.9 KRMA 2.2 KCNC 11.7 . KBDI 0.9 KWGN 4 .1 KDVR 5.2 KMGH 10.2 KTVD 2.4 KCEC 0.1 KPXC 0.5 KTFD 0.0 KFCT 0.6 -. KRMT 0.0 ALT 0.2 KWHD 0.1 Colorado Springs-Pueblo 0.0 KRDO 0.0 Cheyenne-Scottsbluff 0.0 KLWY 0.0 KGWN 0.0 Rapid City 0.0 KDUH 0.0 DMA REVIEW 05-06 VIEWING SHARES FOR LARIMER COUNTY, CO DMA With Reported Viewing Station Share Casper-Riverton 0.0 KCWC 0.0 Grand Junction-Montrose 0.0 KFQX 0.0 Albuquerque-Santa Fe 0.0 KREZ 0.0 Los Angeles 0.0 KTTV 0.0 KNBC 0.0 KABC 0.0 KCBS 0.0 Cable Origination and Pay Cable 42.8 Non-DMA Area 1.0 (Includes Homeless Stations and LPTV Stations. ) DMA REVIEW 05-06 VIEWING SHARES FOR WELD COUNTY, CO DMA With Reported Viewing Station Share North Platte 0.0 . KNOP 0.0 KPNE 0.0 Denver 57.0 KWGN 4 .4 KCNC 11.7 KDVR 4.0 KMGH 7.8 KRMA 1.9 KUSA 16.1 KTVD 2.9 KBDI 0.8 KCEC 4.5 KFCT 0.5 KPXC 0.8 KWHD 0.0 ALT 0.1 KTFD 1.3 Cheyenne-Scottsbluff 0.1 KGWN 0.1 Rapid City 0.0 KDUH 0.0 Casper-Riverton 0.0 KFNR 0.0 Los Angeles 0.0 KTTV 0.0 Cable Origination and Pay Cable 41.3 Non-DMA Area 1.5 (Includes Homeless Stations and LPTV Stations. ) DMA REVIEW 04-05 VIEWING SHARES FOR LARIMER COUNTY, CO DMA With Reported Viewing Station Share New York 0.1 WCBS 0.0 WNYW 0.0 WNBC 0.0 WABC 0.0 Lincoln & Hastings-Krny 0.0 KWNB 0.0 Denver 55.4 KCNC 11.5 KDVR 5.1 KMGH 10.1 KPXC 0.6 KUSA 18.1 KWGN 4.1 KTVD 2.1 KRMA 1.9 KBDI 1.3 KFCT 0.3 KWHD 0.0 KCEC 0.3 KTFD 0.1 Colorado Springs-Pueblo 0.0 KXRM 0.0 KRDO 0.0 Cheyenne-Scottsbluff 0.1 KGWN 0.1 • KLWY 0. 1 KKTU 0.0 Rapid City 0.0 KDUH 0.0 Casper-Riverton. 0.0 KCWC 0.0 Grand Junction-Montrose 0.0 KFQX 0.0 DMA REVIEW 04-05 VIEWING SHARES FOR LARIMER COUNTY, CO DMA With Reported Viewing Station Share Albuquerque-Santa Fe 0.0 KREZ 0.0 KOB 0.0 Los Angeles 0.0 KCBS 0.0• . KTTV 0.0 Cable Origination and Pay Cable 43.4 Non-DMA Area 0.9 (Includes Homeless Stations and LPTV Stations. ) • DMA REVIEW 04-05 VIEWING SHARES FOR WELD COUNTY, CO DMA With Reported Viewing Station Share New York 0.0 • WCBS 0.0 North Platte 0.0 KNOP 0.0 62.2 Denver KUSA 17.1 KMGH 9.4 KWGN 4.7 KCNC 12.3 KDVR 4.8 KTVD 2.6 KPXC 1.1 KBDI 1.3 KFCT 0.6 KCEC 5.7 KRMA 1.5 KRMT 0.0 KTFD 1.1 KWHD 0.1 Cheyenne-Scottsbluff 0.1 KGWN 0.0 KLWY 0.0 Rapid City 0.0 KDUH 0.0 Casper-Riverton 0.0 KTWO 0.0 Grand Junction-Montrose 0.0 KKCO 0.0 Albuquerque-Santa Fe 0.0 KOB 0.0 Los Angeles 0.0 KTTV 0.0 DMA REVIEW 04-05 VIEWING SHARES FOR WELD COUNTY, CO DMA With Reported Viewing Station Share Cable Origination and Pay Cable 36.6 Non-DMA Area 1.1 (Includes Homeless Stations and LPTV Stations.) DMA REVIEW 03-04 VIEWING SHARES FOR LARIMER COUNTY, CO DMA With Reported Viewing Station Share 0.0 New York WWOR 0.0 WNBC 0.0 WABC 0.0 WNYW 0.0 Lincoln 6 Hastings-Krny 0.0 KWNB 0.0 0.0 North Platte O? 0.0 58.2 Denver KUSA 17.4 KDVR 5.2 KFCT 0.5 KTVD 2.2 KCNC 12.5 KWGN 4 . 9 KPXC 0. 9 KBDI 0. 6 KRMA 1. 4 KMGH 11.2 KWHD 0. 1 KCEC 1.2 KRMT 0.0 Colorado Springs-Pueblo 0.0 KOAA 0.O Cheyenne, WY-Scottsbluff, NE o.z KGWN 0.1 KLWY 0.0 0.0 Salt Lake City KSTU 0.0 0.0 Albuquerque-Santa Fe KASA 0.0 DMA REVIEW 03-04 VIEWING SHARES FOR LARIMER COUNTY, CO DMA With Reported Viewing Station Share 0.0 Los Angeles KCBS 0.0 KNBC 0.0 KABC 0.0 Cable Origination and Pay Cable 40.7 Non-DMA Area 0.7 (Includes Homeless Stations and LPTV Stations. ) DMA REVIEW 03-04 VIEWING SHARES FOR WELD COUNTY, CO DMA With Reported Viewing Station Share 0.0 New York WWOR 0.0 Wichita-Hutchinson Plus 0.0 KBSL 0.0 Lincoln & Hastings-Krny 0.0 KWNB 0.0 0.0 North Platte KNOP 0.0 60.1 Denver KMGH 10.7 KUSA 19.5 KBDI 0.7 KFCT 0.8 KCNC 11.8 KRMT 0.0 KPXC 0.9 KTVD 2.4 KRMA 1.5 KWGN 6.0 KDVR 5.0 KCEC 0.6 KWHD 0.1 Colorado Springs-Pueblo 0.0 KXRM 0.0 Cheyenne, WY-Scottsbluff, NE 0.1 KGWN 0.1 KLWY 0.0 0.0 Rapid City KEVN 0.0 KDUH 0.0 Casper-Riverton 0.0 KKTU 0.0 DMA REVIEW 03-04 VIEWING SHARES FOR WELD COUNTY, CO DMA With Reported Viewing Station -. Share Los Angeles 0.0 KABC 0.0 KNBC 0.0 Cable Origination and Pay Cable 39.0 Non-DMA Area - 0.6 (Includes Homeless Stations and LPTV Stations. ) EXHIBIT D r or 01 w IC w a 0 v C co m 2 — — 0) m m c 't 'tf31 1 E E W L co N l0 a T T 8 co a . t l`0 5 ; _ a a D C— Y CC cg N N O > O C i0) > > ; vc C o 0 0 Z m m c 0 r— c a o ca N Et t W C I-- I— O 'O •G w c c V V °1 '� coal O.Y E c T >. d In S o o o > m a E -c t oa a YYdE• -yLo € °moo' EE E16 16 'o0' 0 V• N «22 4-1 w r N H m C G c o o o N C y E E c .c r x m •>, __Q ) d E b o C C ° w O 0 0 ▪ N C O `� tic c t y m > = O515w � 00 � _ siico=�Qa rd1 a EQ N t r > > C C C V E E :13- .2- C y 0 Y .2128 o N " C tC +� EEcano5 2co2' '5 'oEc c = C > .i = mew ! O -0 U 2 O Y O 5 15 7 -o -oa o y H 2 d c c y E t c w d o c g a m 0, d 0 y oW o p H C o N y o o y 0 $ a N CO H j 7 y 7 J 0 M >. C _COOL) OO w c r C O O CO Ea 0- o y (U C I_ 15 W C C conic o y I_ O) c o t t N 0 t w' � x$ c L or ofa aci o o m v E Y E 'E a E > W - C CD a0 S. 'O m O CD C tC6 d > > > m c 0 m E 0 0 Oow .s.° 00 O y 7y Y .7.. L N .c .c r .. O t o ' �' l0 '00_ C O w N 'O w r ow W N N .-• a f/1 E U E Ol .. a O N t). Z p1 o 01 Ol in o o O) Of O) O) Y Ol N 01 Ol Ol 01 01 so Ol O7 p O OY OY YY O OY YYY aY OY Y ...0) OYY .1L Y Y LL > > a > a a n > > a a n n rn a > a s n > a n a a a t d co r CO N r E N N N N ell r N N r fV N r N N r N N N N r N 07 ,.... N N Clip_ r a Oi Pt 0 O O' 0 0 O' o o O' ON O O O' 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 9 0 6- 2 2 O� 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a TO O 0) 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 Z Qj y^ N w y N N d N N y y NN N N N N N N N N (-FUN N N C w N E al o o .C t ] m 0 ` o m .C d E E c c c E y w H 'E y0y 7 X E n E d e--) got)c U aoi C m '00 O ` O C N N N o C y y • O ,.O„ .O-. w O N C O N C co N N N C C t- 0 • '• OE a a >. C N t w O) cp O a 02V . 3 N O .C U U •N N N C o .C O E N a N d 0 C — 0 2 0 E O y u) d t L N 7 co O y y v C C w -0 O Y > ,m E o O O coamt ccccEECs- ooUcY3z3 cr .crm ,., yro m o a rn o _'o ,.. CO o D o t m 12 U .C E c`3 `0 i s w 10) m 0 U > _ am m E 'o oaa .. 0 0 0` 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 r•••• f`.- t-- 0 l'... I..- l`.. 0 r-- t•-• t•- 14.- r•-• f`- I,- 0 0 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N 0 f, f� 1� 0 co M f� N r O Q) Q ;1 O O) T GO OD f� iN M r O) W ;so C C7 N N (NCO N N N N 01.- ‘_o) M V '7 V V V V V V V V V V C') C) f7 0) f+) M (V) M M Cr) Y Q N 3 yy a CO E aco m to co m co ca En C E Qt o0 CI co N C— L_ L — p E �0t g co m L CA 10 c t C C C O L C ,_ d U *B. O Y fa c C C m p m J >` "• - m E > v` o = d ..- o = m 5 8 c 01� 'LLm m L (p r ;C c t c 8 y co 0 .42016m -. m m y ° ° ES — .c E d 3 x c 2E) a t m a) • m r m e rA q z c - en• OD co L U N N y O J •L• 7 C O L , m a 2ci,cn dd � y 8. m. N .� m m YrhA N w m C• t m — O co c W � 7 to N H t 0 ° � V G. '0 L 'f0 N 0 — 7 12 C O m m m ,. It m -m0 C a o 3 c�p 0 .. y WIDE w x x ^ m m L NO 'a m L L C o L 7 O N C co N V 8 N m 8 m C .x C :O 7 c L c L L L E a E 0 c a m co 0 0 w E o16 co) 76 d 8 0 m co c- c P- co c �' 2 r = > > E E 8 m •c m o —7O . `8 v m E a) co n m COm U E c a •a� w oaa - c� uEE wEv > _ — M Y r.. Y p. co Y Z N Ol CO Of 0) 01 YY YYY Y co o) n > a a. O YYY YY n a aaa a > as >a n a a a N N N N c.4 N N N N N N N N , 0 r ri ro n 0 0 0 0 N r� n r� r% r; r r r; r` r� o r ra r n r 0 r- r� o 0 0 o r r- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0) 0) 0) 00 AO92UU.0000000000o 00000 oo m^ d 9)(17 CV. NN N G1 N 0) NNNNNNN wNNN O) NNNNN ENN d N 0 CO • la N •O 'O T m in y O C C co .E a to co co• o - aXi m m n $ 3 c� °1 ' _aril co c L m 1- cb L °� c d Ol L Y a_ J 7 U U .. Y W n0 -0 " m .m. C 3 -01) C c E m a l a a Y y o m c Y y v o � m ; H o 3 8 C 8 ID E m P C y in V 9 a_ O Q N E L' ,N C �, n L •O N O Doc .O J 'O E O E « E Y.ft co C O ~ C 8 O L U U i c C a m N O O7 m p t c N f 2p L m m -o m E V 1:1 in 0 # y T N N > 8 2 Y C V o — E o r n € `° r m E o •E w O• C C C y m co O m > 02 Y m cci .? av ( NN V E o aci o o m m E . cOw Ea3 o .o5 'orno m .. t 0 0 0 r• N. r� r- 0 r- 0 o 0 r• r• 8 8 8 8 0 r- 8 8 8 0 8 8 r` n 0 n n r• r- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N CV N N C N N N N N N N N N W f�O f�0 r N a a N N N I� N CO M M CO CO N .- Cr) n f7 M a f f N M d • N t C N O co 4 a a � O O ti N 9 N co E 0 3 o dwr O O R > �`rnv> o o v .0 N :0 (CO U c to O t ` U N 0 C E 3 C 'C L L b E as 6 it ,._� tTL L co L N N co ID C CC C 03 _ ` c Y rEov cc ° uai I V V 2 co crd .2 d c c �i m O 0 N a s a N co N o C C O C w y C C CO L C `L' O N N a d O .N > c N oto t. ° 00 5on > mto w c c8 d�((ENNppp] N C E "' 3to lii .� N y co co N O w J O Q� _ 'O J N N N O O N o c N 'n N 80, 20 c V •C c, C N J = Ew � c = Z' EPEE co co auo ,- , 8 3 V8L •. n L 2' L L w ` o C 8 - 00E 0 N Ol N 12 13 m N N O 0) > ._ .'_` ^ -c E C N 7 goo'. y m d la E `° °' ▪ of a :: :c a v a a a v E c� :? c� « a c� c E c 3 0 z0 o) o) o) o) co Y Y Y Y o) o) o) o o) o) o) o) Y YYY a as as as a > aaa as a a n a _ e i O r N 0 r � Nr- coNCOommcbo0000000008CD 9co0 oTooT000000 ._ 000 . . . 00000000o CP) 0P) O N 0I N N CON N N N N N U) N N N G) N N N NJ CNN V N N N N 77 O N N N V O > «., C r p o N �p {{{lCppp1 9 3 ,_ N N 7 z' z ! j o) o) y N m N O 0 p C J SO in 'y h N N N N N V .•-• O W O a w g N V N O L C a or,y , O O O a a3 ,__ O C T, O c 0 2 >' l0 Oi N coC l cp E C a >` U •y L - - O w c ail o) Ol y V y N N EN U N a2i 3 E v c 'E E O E E w 3 3 ,m r r d o E E e `O -o Emir) E n oc c g E j, > O• 7 l0 > y C N C C 'N-' V V CD O N N 3 N w C CU E D Q 0 CO y Jy N U C. N N 2 U o) -8g E N N O 3 O E o o) N Y o 0 3 o N > O a U V F U V N. r N. h to to 0 CO 0 CO CO CO CO CO CD to c0 CO CO CO CO to CO CD to CO V O CO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N O CO O Nt CO ? NNN N N N N O) LC) I a r co e C to t r O N N N N .•4- N N f� c ( N N N C� (� N N• (� N N N �V � r r r Vco y w L 0� 0 Y as t c E Y N � ti 'E N ' m 'O 0 w15 V w imp co a_w O E vas E `H E m c 8 w o r 8 w T co a 0 t CEm O t Y e ow c0 � U ibm vw _ w a7r ftlu m° .. C v w w t a •E N v w c t `oi ,v_ c a m c Y w E 8 w mcam o. c c 4. cc 0c8 Eat E 2 w O] L w — o w o c w tax a ° E ° cca w coca 4.• • _ � _ a d o �C d v m Ease) € a E d m c r m `° m ° w co aa) v= cell mrn c c m o o E o a c N c E v aci a r w w t m o H E 0 o c .CAN �' ` v i 0 m : .y E To N c •O O p a) r O 1° m E RHII m Ogtm ° cw acio 03°c r Ia0 - c w a E °q w w t y c� a v v w w w vi E , 'w a) o> o o 0) - 0) a Y Y Y oY Y w . O Y Y w a > O a a 01 0) : O 0 0 0 O. 0 0 - 00 01 0 Z YYYY >. -YS. . c0 > I 0 > > 2 202: 20. x > •Z a n aaaac0 000 0 > t0 00. o _ cON moo coO rrrrr rmrc4Igc4c4mmmmroc4mm cocpcoc oO dco a5co000 • cbocbmogmmc? cb0 0000 0 0 0 i >co O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 a 0 0 cp 0 0 ° 0 0 Fp a0 0 0 0 O ° c O N N N N N N N N is N N N N N N N N N N N N a) N N N N N N v N T To 0 aa) aa) 0) 8 E >c o 3 va) o c y " ° w m w o m O N 'o L E U• m la m m ° E c > > w w Eco v w w o w m w 0 -au —0 w o C t o o C N w m -0 -067- 0-° '- O C D cow 3 C w Y r 0 i .Si E > E .c w c m m C 0 '°O co c w =p ° r m c v 1 o > E w C C > w CO •C o v v D. o m v o 2 072. 0c131:, Y o m ° m E ° c m o o o ° m 'w vim E m E aE E 220132 C c l�0 A •0 a 431 0 7 N N n N o N U o m o a) v ° cc in ° m m c O f`0 a rn o d .n a > s v E d a w w w , m c� o � =28 .� 30 ..- 000000000000000000000000000000000 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Q N N N Q N N OrfONvr OO0) aoCvMMrMNNNNNN rrrr ° INN lnOW N . . . . . . . O o 0a) 0) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O r r r 0) 0 to a1 a N . . . d Y 0 2 44 m .L• 'O L L CD C m m C V C C— r— _ -- O O` L N 0 -45 xiL « CO N Y o d m 'm3 �+ ami •E m o Or .t m E w L . l00 N .0to Mo CO 15ma "Co � � _ 2g a x3 ' a L _ (0 > 0 O E m L 07 M coN I. v 'V - O a1 'C c 'o a1 v = N Y C C Y, ° w ; N C y E 08 E C Et O 'O 0 13 13 13 O N 2 N 30 O 2 w_ .o N cOco N N o .. O- .y N 0 O , a 0 O co s co > C C Z a0i c '->0 E t_. co ai g >, ids 32 a= a° a O y O N 01 m ` •C L N E S+ L �! > 4 N > c• N m m « N 2 > E m aci 1:Q3 o f a1 a 2 o 0 O a c .r fl !JH 2 AN 0e DNwE cc c€ E8 rdc� SEec co e _v -o a >' m v c� > > .T a N 3 co a m m o N I.- i, fO0 N a a `m yOy it, j {r�pp €oral co t > :: t w m PI x E H N d o h N M M N U 3 _ L +., o V w, r_ 01 C _ Stn '0 N E Ol O « o) CL Y Y 2a9: 172 01 O1 01 01 0 Ae N 01 0 0/ O1 O1 Y 0) (O CO Y O Y Y Y Y s O Y > Y O Y Y a Y _Z O N 0 Y 0. a a a nnaaa > O. a > anco 0. co f0 23 23 23 u1 ,O M cb cb 4c) `40c48 '40c4cou? u? 12 `? u' u' oo �n `. 0000 . N t0 N co N f0 N a° 0 a° a° co a° co a7 N N g 8 N N N N co m N a7 a° f0 0 ' 0 0 0 0 23 0 0 0 0 ..... 0 0 O1 O1 Q) O O 00 01 023 St) 001 0) 0001 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O • N N N N N N d c4-10-' N 'co- or N N N N N N N N N (VON N N N N N N N N of « E. p N > y e N a 'C « 3To- a1 Re m 0 - O m .= C 01 T > -0 n V O c '0 -0 c o m O � � _ a>`1 d � c� o m m '� o w C y c � = c m a � m CD 0 � v •Y •c ' a 0 � c«a ! ma c c 0 3 E « o P N 0 x a O a >, o. j C N ,_ n •- 0 •; N L2 N L O 0- x O a1 L on m E U m a a"- EEC"r0 = —lO N w :. >, n .- N a1 d m O' •p L O 01 E Y N O 01 E • D o m s E SI a o �. N C L > N E v N m a . a m m o _ « co N m N a O` = O 2 .0 02 N N m N p re m c8 o a>i a`1 Lm. c`N �° E o v a`1 a`1 a L t' E E =° dN .c 0 € 0 o m r 3 m m E a 0 j C 01 > O .N 7 J O m co Y > y m - N N N O O N > > .- m E n 0 3 3 a v o v°°_ v E c� v E 3 3 o w rn o L L G c m o v= _ 3 O 0 23 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 `23 23 8 23 23 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N N N N N N N N N N a O 01 N a r O a r O 0 0 Tr 0 o M N .- O 01 10 l0 t f� a) V. e (O a7 1n a Cr) N N N r 03 M N N N N N r e- r. r 0) 01 O O o 01 W O1 231 0) O O O 0 0 CO ao ao ao ao N N r r r N N N N N of co aNIn N to J CO L O roT � ._ t a a m e—L 2 a> '5 € 43 E ° CO m J N N O of t• a a m` m t3 fl a _ 0 '-• 0 O. C a ayi a c c v x c• w .- E d w c N O O ow E EP. o = — v m •C 3Era o o m g c g o g nor. _ m o c 16 '0 CD c 0 H E n -y c 2. C N .c C co - .C p -0 co ..... m a N N a pp�� e- J L m = 0 • 'o d g co _ lD o C L .C N .. r N O N 0 E O Y € E co J A O c w w er d N V « 0. E w E a a03 H Y Zit g 0 CD 0 0 0 ≥ ≥ a 11 Z Y a XS COOZ > 0tO 'Q • 0. - - M c? 6 ' m 6 o o O O d N O 0�p to t0 0 O to � � p O t0 t0 t0 l0 t0 NN N o CD CD f0 N N > c N 0 0 0 0 ' 0 0 0 N ((�� ' u�i ��pi 0 O O C 0) CD y y Fp 0 0 0 0 F0 O O co 00 a O O 0 cg 0 00 0 N N N cm d N d d" 'O 'O W N N N N d N N N d N a N N N N N _N N N L W N CD E L. -C .O w. to 123c .c ca t tocoa at`a) 'tc—. .a a N N N c .co 0 O' b dd to to x y C in 0 w liu 3 L — c r 'm Y J E en a > j v O` N 0. U d co N J tD CD N L Y N CD T tp L O O ≥ w ly0 N C Y N O] N AL. O N O) cY_0 lTC `y '� J Y d L y V E w O N 0 3 L r t t 1.3E2 C N .o. C y C 3 f0 O t3 w T N H N O. 5 C N - € N N N w o f N W 'O N J •C E E N V 'O R o d Y J m = V C .y O d m m N t0 N r T d �.. J p O N t0 l0 3 m m, E d E L of a 8 47 a m E .0 v c w i . E "rn L W - w E 3 rn rn § 88S 0 o m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - 002 000000000000000000000000000 2 ,=1.5: N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N NO N� 1-- --- - N N N N N N N r r o ta0 N N N N N N O O r O O O ;BLOW) t0 t0 t0 w o t0 w t0 o tp t0 to to t0 o t0 t0 to tp t0 t0 o t0 n ,b N io a d N O I . Lp > O.C m E. m tx 07) OOO L E Q T c m a in a m o w c c (8 O O i a of m ofd C M m = O m ao 461 .� c > c m CD O O- C N 'g y L o c o m m am •C �m�00 m 2 C CO) uo W C 0 0 E E L O 3 m c u o w $ m 8. c mod 3 d � M - o $ _ 0o v 2 ca' S Em E °�' c c m (p ? O1 E .c w OD C 9 C >, O T •O j • 0 y _ coC O > co E a a) m p C O m m y •O N L O a 8 V' 0 CO > E E F- $ O _o Y m °= m api 9. ° m = E rn o o f r c_ m c v m m c .= ox c U 8. 8 C Y C E C 8 N N 2 :pt. ?.m r w O �' E ..- oevE w E s4.S > tm 0 � mt- 0 Sl o m m goy C. ° c c 3 m m r S m C a > c c o a m O H “) -15 ,- .- - 42EO - m m g O 0 c E (Oi o c m E € m o f > y>y L C E a 3 S L a a .c t HE E o N U OO w U O C a (J N N_.0. E C 3 o • F. .O O o h.wo Y Ya. Ya Y Y Y Y Y Y ma a a a Z Y > > Y > ≥ d 2 D ≥ 2 G ≥ ≥ Y O l- Y Z C. a _ ._ p a . <Omin > <ommm, ul, a io a _ > a• in (o a > m am > m T T M Y M " � �p o 0 o r o <� <p OOONNN N <ONN (O <OO <OCO (ON OOgOOc OOi N N N O O O809) 8888 '880- ?1 T Ol N N O Q1 88O8OO OOO y 'Qj 'y N N N •G1 NCVNNNNNNO N N N N N N N N m C_ C .m. m c m• co Ol m _ co Ol m m C •py U >, L O U m• - m m m L •o mIi2 92 0 (5 2 '0 O M t�l C O C 3 L o OO v w a m a s o O m d 7 � 4 E v m e8 .0 g1.0 2 F tS c a' o E U m '- C m m .- O m Vl m p 3 Y U U i~r 2 •� E d 2 . f`0 O .._. mO ` Ow = pLO 04UIilh # ,54 ° a€ o c O ca c o i w i 72 2 c (mi o 7'e E o g i c P ' _ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 f0 0 O OOOOOOOOOOO OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO N N N N N N N �V N N N N N N N N N N N N N NN NNN N N <O N V' N M (� CO N (O N 1- O O1 CO N V 1- 1- O O IA 71 l= • N N N N N N N •t t M N N �V N N N N N N M M. M M M M M M M M M co u I . . � : $ . co ti, . . .cE c uu. :uoiiuuuuuuuuu'n IL- I. § kJIIII!I! I .. 0 �0 co k 2 � • ° k k > � $ 8k 4 � e @ c ZS % a) � k \ 2 . \ / $ 7 § / f ® c \ & ) } § § \ 7i S - � 8 $ r $ J am . « " 01 2 & : 2 • • « » � iJ � k fa 2 _ \ q - . � Z Vit 2 •i G § § \ t § . \ . , \ } § % \ ( § 2 7 Icv 2 9 f . :to co k § \ ) � e . } � Ea . ! IfC kCO ID 7 E \ 2 ■ k � 6 f ] ' ka173 � k / R pi tu cocvm ■ 2 ka . s Lo 0 co—k ill . 0 ' - t , 01 "i § . - t § } � ' 0 � § > c a > \ ' & JI / } - . 2 . 11110 . I cIit • Lo > 8 . + • m. ~ CO OD ~ 8 8 ) Ak § = $ § � C k - a as nnN - § a c 2 § 9 f E . _ © ° . ZIt § } 2 § f� 3 Si k $ k c co a � k { 0 ) 22co 000I—C $ § c Rao o To 0 .-542 f ` � J � — C ° On ° ' # am © ■ f .. g � -50 . . 2 - so ■ e f \ a / 07o . ■ « © F . o = � a � � � § @e � a2ee oa / 0 © 2 E@ ) ) . 4 : $ 2 _ 6. § � ( E � � ' © © = 2a { { f / § B § § - « ` ° ° ty2A0 oap ci, ! g - E > 2 ecco _ 2 © ` @ � • o a. _ m (fl • 0 • Ui . an ._ u .c • L. .C .0 I"' 80000000000000000000000000000000 0000000000 00000 NNNNNNB@000000000000000000 NNNNNa � � � NNO.INCINNNNNNNNNNDINN .- o0) conNrm2r- TrQ § � B \ © © - 2 ° aak % CDCs, PI CO in � ° & & § § aaNNNaam m -o `i m co �' E 10 a 0 c W O3 z iiiilJIlIIulIltl toa.O+ NEN9 'cEo fEOO mM Wrl 1 Niuuiiiiii :i O > m w p Ner to 0 t° cc O v M E E o £ oN ..772 W a t40 0) d O L • 'O N N rn co C N co .� t. M o• O C m a N(06or ., • E a C C O .O .O Ern N 0 7 .0 !A L y o `1 P. N U E a.. U 12 m m C L N = mpe L MOM s . m win v� V E 2 -, t0ia — ccLic ' o m6 7811 E `° `° `' L 0) c ` C QQ m 7 'O N 28 > C 'N t " m Y "' a V 0 p C m � O L ,?.- C .d z N N .''' V V flU1 U Y8> a g m `° d � c• N C ! O N O C U N y C 7 c .ID 0 N co co_ N V p m to m L O N ... 0 2 C N CS m .7+ N tp w 'c m E Y V H 0 ?, rn Qj a• o 3 « 0 3 N o ' EL ca 3 c E v r m m ' Et '.) v v u§i o N 29 E .. E :: M w o v 2 0 • W d Y Y •0) Y 0 Y Y Y Y Y Y ; Y Y Y Y O Y• > . • • 0) N 0 0) m 0) d m m m Z m > O m O Y Y > m ≥ ≥ ≥ Y Y ≥ Y ≥ ≥ ≥ ≥ 0) 0) 0) > ≥ 0 M ≥ ≥ Y E .≥ > > v vr � tntntntn mvtnvtn iotncot� tntnmvtn — _110 min to to to to w Y y L666 to to i tototo 0 0 0 000 0000 c0 rn o 0 -T000 rnrnrnrn rnrnrrn PP E E d Poo N 0) N • 0) '0 0 0 m 0 0) 000 '0)08) CC C m > C 0 v m O)Tom -0 To 0 e C C t° U N tC C N _ U > W. N - N O) - O F %I = "' € Es "" C l° 0) O O O O L N m V m N t;.- - m r in c c uoi �°- `° = c m E co '� N > o 0 E c_ 9 m w c vow o € i f p U L N 7 745 N �1 Yd . m C L N •E Y •, V C C E co .C w co c 3 c c r _ o c w c ;; m o 7 o ° " t m t a L d a E z to d 1-01 i °) c� ow `m 5. 0 o a) m m ,_ a rA N 'y O C U d C 7 N m N N .O. cC o m c o v a E ? m o x t� .n a o E to E co `) v o - - a m a) of L u • 88888888 t00000t0t00to to tototototo tototototototototo 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N °O h 0 to st M a O) N W N r e — C` N N N N CO to a M t� O) °0 C r °O M N r N N N N N N N N a a a a a a a N , N , N r r r r r r r r r r r r O I a m ME E o d t 14 t CO `m E d o H a c0 a O Wes 7w 3E & g 4.0TO W c o >' $ E `2 Z H L m � v al c EI to- .0.c o § N iii % E � `° o q� o a) 18 v m 8 4tu 0 > .g > u, € = m 0 c y' E a rn v 0 `3 E 8 3 v r E .c 0 U 0 v/ w O O 01 01 N N Y Y co Y NO Y Y y w Y Y Z •≥ OYY > > YYY > > Y > > 0. ° 0. a ≥ ≥ ≥ aaa , a .- aan. aa �o > o. a _ _ a a a . _ n ii N 1010 8 l0 O 117 u7 10 u I0 0 N vv 000000000u7lnoo ,� Oo `0000 `000000000 0 df di C C C C C C u) G) G) C C U) C C C C d G) C C C C C C C C d C d N J V 2 O d c co -d p _Up. l`0 y .Th p ; P 1/43 3 o O y @ N j .5. { ry C 3 7 j N 8 N O E 5 N c c w c `° 0 d o E�p > C o d c ' E c �' O y d IC C O N C 13 ,S Y I]. o p , U N CL 1:23p U 'O N N O' O a V pH O1 Or .O. O. O yto C 9 = y 77 N y N (0 10 O) U C a p y 3 L .. C a 0 0 7 Le YJ al N E ? w N .0 N > c_ y-y u a T " yjy c C x 41 Vayl m O c - > > y>y > j yOy 0 3 V Y a, := 0. Y 0 > 3 O .- O N C1 0 a N N U L Y_ p) 3 10) O O O to 1n In in 10 N in 10 10 1n in in N In In in in 10 10 10 10 V7 O O 10 V7 u7 10 N u) 1p 10 0 0 0 0 00 0 O O. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N ;to h ro 1n Tr el a r 0 0 N C0 C V nt N N N N N N N n- Nr nt C\0 1`0 N 0 O O O r r 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 r r r O) W r r r r r r r r • .. il O. co E co 0 iiuiuiiiuil a CY a) a E S n 3 .0. � d a) t N 'O 1 CO — .C d •6 O co •1 V cE � � E ; 2di °' al A � C E N C 0 C � C: �(p :2:a.O ,� C r° N p C d E � i Y � � I o °' � JN ': E N O E V C .. sC OLCQp� .CVNC yNNJO• Y �� .W-� N L E `+a> y S, caf°iaidcI' c VA _see) � rc ° � oii E ° Y d or, c E 3 c g 'm o C o E N L cu E {yE L U « co c a J= V C L O N Eli 'O w « h d V •- L Y in th Tr LO .Y O O Y Y Y d .5:210 Y+Ili 1 iiiiiiii I liesi co le-oi 1 o II H . • v N ° c .d ' c o � C Q CO Q O > -N Na) `m 0) N• YN a7 O- « CNfa N i- ; EO NN3 '0 U NL 3O N ar ; .. - ; HH1UIhH Eoci - E0003Err . m Ova 0 0 u-, u-, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o o o o o o o o o o o 0 0 0 0 0 gin 0 0 0 00000000000000000000000000000000sin N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N VV N N N CO a— N Cat 92 .A..., co N N a- a- a- a- N N NTao rove) . r.._ NNNNNNmto- o� °� a� arcoaocococococor-- r-- r-- r-- r - 1- N N r-- as (0 (0 (010 (0W N OI N 0- ig w CO C N CO il 5 y o v v Y +-• `) N N d U7 N d 7 ! ! E .c 'O C 0) W W a C 0 0 C y C NC co c '0 -0toOLPCAS liii; j = 0- To 3' i' iW Ae» c _ E a) w p y O) y � � O O � .iC c� € ; C co LI) co 8 CO 7 LO -0 !p O '0 V C co .C O O C E V C C O 01 C y 01 _ N O Icli E .c0- -cN N C CO Y ' O 'C T C N +� d N •C' N !�• N G) C L C > L O O) l0 l0 a `� Ce�pp ��pp OQpp� E y a " e O N C • •g -c U c) 0 cL g >` 7 1p0 C L N •� N - N E co CO E >1,� dy >y. t� HIIHI N �y7y' �pCy7N7 t . •10 •j,NO 38Z - C ur L -o y Z 0 0 O CO O) CO O) CO CO Y O) Y Y O: Y O O O Y 0 0 p, O aaaaa CL Y a O. Y O. > > > a > > Z y a N N a N CO N N N N N N Z O Z. 2 m > > > > a > ,2 ≥ 2 > > > > y .2 . It ) r _ 0 01 N y c d N 0 c, O a) w N N O y 0 O N CO C W co E N C C 7 p d m w E O M 0 O C ` y c m C . co rs mv to' a� o c E >. -0 - c - 0 N E .0 w c L n 0 0 o co E v ern -5. - = � J E v E co co ✓ a>) U E c N m ) > c c m a 8t CD>" E co O >. cO2. p >. — 'O >,L > 7 CO NCJ N U 0 jEituit . a O c7 .! rn O` 0' C, O U) U) U) O IO t0 10 in O 10 r!) in N 828 :300000088888 rp U) tO U) U) LC) t O ,s• O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Q N N N c0 t0 M r c0 N O O U) 10 V. V. M O O f` f7 Cr) co N N " "cr) co r O U) � c� NN N N r' r t0 it) st O M N - e4 N ,,,- LO U) U) O U") U) If) If) M-� D •c • C 6 c a `o co c 2 •E 0 m N N — a a c o E o 5 E • o a) c w ; O O Ccv N > VI m v0 H O. To' 3 m 0 v E 3 o .131 m Y « Tia• E O co 5 m a) .0.. y R 0 o ai to c BE E 1LU ! U1 vc mc V o xw W m E c - � 3 c d o c c v CO w o a m '� $ mW c ni 3 *e o- v 0 2 °1 0) m N m o p a �+ oo nal Y = m6caLmo0t W 2 �o {Ep N m L' a1 C C m 0- E_ _v t m E {5 r .d.. 0 — 0 C U 0 B d 0 9 al 7 -0 43 fA o S C C > V > —co a T ? cob- 2'' a) T c 0 N o O L 'rj �' co U Mal co E •O •. L C Y E O T 3- )0 0- a) "as = E .a) — ow N J g O S) m 3 0 0 E " m n t- > d o 8 m Hwy > E v E t E _ ti) Sian,a v_ o) a) m E 0 m a m « • « 0 —_ 0 N Ol Ol o) o) o) Ol Ol W co O) O Ol OI R. aa a > > > O O ° Y a a v' a a z a s °> °> a > aaaa o. a a °> 15 0) N 0) 0 0 Y > > Y Y Y Y N N N N S N > o ≥ ≥ ≥ ≥ ≥ ≥ ≥ ≥ ≥ ≥ a > a ≥ ≥ a ._ aaaa ≥ > > ≥ 0_ N 10 10 .- i a- f0 a? a? r m- r• ` N N N N N N N fl N N N fl > O g $ $ C oag $ $ $ 8go88 E E ?? E � E E EEO, rnrn •0 7 •≥ T •d 'd v m a� G a) d v _ •a% c c d o arc c c c as m m 0 0 0 0 ei• a) m 0 O 3 v �? ° a a c om 3 a 0 m a3i 0 a V Y w t0 O O �. I! o• m X > 0 w 0 d co moo °� a s m y o E ! C :: 0 m E E) n U > d a m a ��pp E �a 0• a) a ,mom Yto c G. O) = CO y, •O O 0 O •— aa7 a) c S C) N >. — w �' c z m m ` N V c = d 0 '00 " O C o 7 0 co c L O w t m m -a 0 : co ca 1, 0 0 0 03 co 0 a) 7 N O J «O 0 = « 0 a) .0 0 'O 0 0 0 fil of 7 a) O � aai `3rnE vma `3Emvo `333o � > d `3v Ls dmam `3n « gS000000gogoo880888880088888888o ornao (O M N 000 m r- CO C700) 0 M aar9cs NNNN @NNN � � O N f� N a O N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 aaa « r � ri a CO CO t M N il- i W In N l0 a Et m r t = 8 2 -c c lO7 m a O R C CAi . —_o rim 2 lij = 8m o C.O8 !A N C438 mg c Y 2 ++ es- C .__ m T C Cl o O pp5 . N al O m N C O esc a) C m t4 loi J >, % 215m T 1 {p Op -c° V Qi. C co N Y L ° w - m E 7200 c N E aw w E -O 3 a N -00 — >,• a) co a) PP p L ties) 47) 00 . v O 7 712 1 m m C E L T N O O L O N = la c >"G ° o maa m . a ,-- c vv a a a a a a e N a a a a a a a a a °N p mama Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y O Y Y a a a a a a a > o a n a a o a a n a a a > n a a a a i a y a d d a'S d d aZ d N reNNN0;INNI Ma l'7 M M M aN N N g $ $ sga $ $ le > l.. LLY lO �() LO O In N N 1O a, a o) .i rn rn rn rn rn O Q ._ E .j .. .; E — E .s, E .s, .; E .; E E o E E E -6-07 m m ai ai y y w y^ d c d o a� c a> c a�_ c a�, a� c a� c c c c c c `m d £ v c m ao w 13 E 6 r o N C y .o N « 9 O O p C1 w C a y =O L C c C 0 N O '� O N C Y m020 ", , c c a C > d 2 t 0 a g N N 7a a6 N 1p 8 7 n 15 y V Q C N N E N N N O 2 O 1p O O e — E co 'O 'cn O n t• o /a a) L 2 'O w c E t m = ,- .- m O « a O C O N - '54 :5 T O O r.. c 3 7 Y V Ol m L c O 0 .43 •O a N m N la laa 'l0 Cc c N mop 2 !- m a) c lea N Y a d p. N V y L a7 O N « L aaE_ L a a 3 a L .b. 5_ N a i- ... V a7 'O 'O a s a 88888888888 rtDeOr0tb lnr hlOvarolOaooh V MNr OMa Nrr c N N N N N N N N N N r N a Q N Q Q O O O O core,- r r r r O O O a O) a I- r n r l0 lO to to l0 O N N r r tn �_ c - - - - - - - ' co al c :7, a w '0 g 2 CO 0 m `rte° c u -o m o d _ d 3 T 8 d t6 o d c E co co c � L c •c 0 2 •E c r L o m w E t 'm 5 c .5 "- o N n E Ti wt c o >' a crS io ayi °� W d a d o c a c o a Y a c m .c V Og) O E ,� '- a n~ ma m a 3 E '- a a o a� nv m CO 3 d ar t >. 'c E v c� a3i a «? CO cc' Z 7 E 3 > 2 '0. .... v .Y X C N o 8 O co 3 > r tJ r O O1 0l O) Ol of m o W of O 4 0 01 O Ol Ol O! Ol O O 2222OYYY YYYY OYY OY as d d �• aaG. naaa > man aana > na > a i a) a) 2a) 2N2e o a) Z N o a) 0 0 a) a7- a) a) a1 a1 al ` \ \ \ ` ` n ≥ ≥ ≥ ≥ ≥ ≥ ≥ ≥ ≥ ≥ ≥ ≥ ≥ ≥ ≥ ≥ ≥ > > ≥ n ≥ o ≥ a ≥ > > a, I- d d `m `w d d `m a`> 1- co d r 14 4-. 4+ 4+ rrr Ni{ E d NN NN N N E E E E E WWWWWN MOS E E E g g g E g g j g E g g g g g g g IA N In 10 g In N E E .`� E E Z E E E E E E E 0 E E E E cc a7 c C o c c a) O. O. O_ N. C N a) d_ C c c a) C c V C a) c C c c • 0) U E , a) W > 0 c o oo 2 N d d _ E 2 W c s. c > yyyU E E' P2 P2 c 2 Y CO o Z O c �- Y Y Y .... O Y Y 7 n a n d a E " E W o y of N 0 3 E oo a c z 8 o 2 o r E o o a°�i o 0 0° w >. ` f l s a m d °. m o "c c o o o g N L 9 d v e o L d d y c0 m a .R m c a y n N O N 4- m2 d i J cc o o o o 0`1 V O O n J o f c ! C c 0 O d G. = G E E 3, c a .c 3 2 •a •a •a w, w a .c a 0. N y_ w e or c0 0 o o 3 w .c a m gvotoggggg0000000000000000000000000000 O 0 LO Tr M N C N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N r r r 0 Oo m f� m N r 0 O ao N n f� r h ao N v M n t Q V ('7 l'7 ('� N N N r r r r M M M M m N N N N N M m M m m m M M m M i...4. N rl ID a t N 1- !N 1 O3 r H •t a>i co E E 8 8 m c a> r is N co N > C Oo ci c c c o cr.: Z c m m m o c E m o) E .o � � o ._ aTi U 0 « v' co w Vi a• c E S' y '� ww an; d 0 t m o V O a 0 ei C aY « o• b E �n 01_= 0 h O co vo vS VccmU �' m •Q2N c3 c e c :o t o d a, d E v 7 'o N $ o a � m w88xvPo0Ec � •omco E c c m m m t E e c o c z ro -0 o O C N c0 l0F° 0 (00 C a. N L ' Sca E m 2 00 - - sz � 67mYca3 — a m c E c > — o N c rn > y -o p E 'c c o % o •or E ar- cY o m U cnt o o .c ; Y > Nv ca > E o m t E ° N a o a o o NamN lluiIl1lllnfllihni as > - w oY Yj> ≥ Y ≥ _ aa _ aaa _ TT T at 08- 104100 N s z '' N E E N E N N �. 7 , 7 N N - - ' 7 r h et .. _ N N N f0 l0 f0 i N N i E g g g g E E E $ E > > E > E E g a g g E E g g a s 0 0 T u' ul c c cn c cn cn occcc CWVV •W orcTccCC `4) ; CCCCC 'ui c c c c d_ �? c d. o o �_ o d d c c c c d d c c c c c ` t c o m m c o a E E � a Y p c P. C N ~ co coo O = m- co C Oo) 1 d — N 0 .YO . C C) — 2 C 0 ea) .- >.C• d N U t Y N x 0 ^- `- 0 +-� 0 .20 .0. '00 ).N p .0 * 503 fOp E t � M e O) U N L X X O C >, L N d N E ` w N CT N c a d N j W In M m .3-1 C 7 l"0 C H L O d _ co IS CEdC1N 73UNN450 % axv NO_ d 7W 7 ` c O N ''C >i Y N C L p CI C1 p p N L LOM m > O L 7 v v 3 L 3, h n° E d u 'c a °, c ° o a m Y ._ N r L° a U a 0o g 0 o N N N N a� Q aa aa N O) 3- Srrrq g O O 8 8 8 8 8 8 O O 8 O O 3 S8. 8 8 0 8 8 g O s g (� f� N (� �p c+j N O 01 (O l0 ' • N O O) CO 1C co M N ,-- m N M N N mop CO I� f0 000 Ni0• O O M N N N N N N N•ei N N N N N N N N N N _ - r 1.4 g a E c rnI rnrrc1111' rr N Y Y W a 2 - cc : 0 J N O O C t L 'v 8 :(20 U _ go o -150 -8 Y 8y,, , 0 C d `q NN = N N _ a OO �, O Y N O c in ; tb t - a 0 . E g J ? o io OOJ LO E Y r L .03 in w O N O ., > m U N Ti -. d c co '13g1 .. I m N V N v O E t' A J cco cg .•O N v E V O O `5 �p N C 500 C 6. N NN . " ' L co loo C h' N 01 d N p8 O -5 O W 6 `� C• v V N N tJ t C CO w N N CO N N g6 ≤ G1 r c�NO o , m c Y 0 O O 4= N N N c _ 2 2 SE v v I— v a = c ... . , E E .000 , 5 CD ° f`O N ti m L Y c Y Y Y A. .. N c ;� c Om0 N E 0 = .00w L v N N N 3 N C N E > > °' d E t = m c = c c o m o= ° 8 c• :° o °c cu7 rcnlimli c� v � � 0 = � U22cou_ al E ., . O w in N cL — O Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y U U U O �: co Z � � ` ` ` O O O Y 0 Y Y Y > Y Y e- ' 1151" . """ ' Y > > > Y ≥ ≥ ≥ > Y ≥ ≥ ≥ ≥ ≥ ≥ a > > > > a a > a r",- 1'7 M > M M M M M M M M M M 0 0 0 0 0 .. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 > OOOOOOO OOOO L EEEv� OEEEEEEE EEEE c c C N v C c c c C C c CCCC22222222 Z Z Z Z Z N Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z co Y co N O C O N :co E E O N N C cu • N C N N N :C. N N 7 N c �. 7 'NC = OZ E O v y w v. N N N E W O N m • 0 .. v O N - I = CO a0 .. m E 3 4) an d 0 w 2 E v t m E :O co _ m > 0 = = -) a m = c DW 5 o c0 a w O v m d c m t r v Y c a, o 0 D O t C c E aNi D Z > > WDOW " 5L N � C � 5 M11. U • UUZ .JLLU2CLOY W U W EYI M M M M M M M M M M M M r OOOOOOOOOOOO O OOOOOOOOOOOO r. 7:: O N N N N N N N N N N N N O O O O N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 M M M M N o N N O O O o v M a r O O O O t N O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 N a N a a N c� N N N N M O N N N N N N N N 8N NN N O N r r r r r r r 4 4 M 0i N r O 6 6 0 6 4 '7 r r r r r EN N N 6. N N N N 6666 r N c i cV N N cV cV N m g a d Hiil I o d v d c W 1 3 al co r CO Q Ea) a1 hi Cc lCa c wJO, w r p0j N E Ji i"al co3 a1 la O N _ 1c Op ENdQ co o N y� C N = •C 52 an N O cto o yC--. lC0 C Q A o m w o w S U aci c .° c > V1 2+ !Q . . • N O w > O o c c - . L C 2-'- CoD 3y •c 'c) J °) d o S3 m m c w d - c L E c EE 8 u ° E c A w J w t) c E N 9 7 N 1:1- c C7 .�. 1lU� 'JO 1Op c J c E W A w Q O J E t V coE '0 1 `7 a w . 3 M w !3 •O O o Q c ._ E lA• OJSSY l~L 'UU .7 O w y O 'a z 1�7]l D Y Y Y Y Y Y O Y O Y Y Y Y Y a O O O O - Qp > > > . M >>is> > N N ti . I I I I I I 000000 N r r r r r r r r r N r N N N N N N 222222 o0 6 00000do066aa6hd6 z z z z z z 0 000000000000000 In U O 0 _ O N r N a) w 6. e al CO C - y }+ L c « c L c o 0 dp c L c = a+ N U J "' L O > G w 'O N (wa w 7 O w w it co ao a) O• o a7 N -0 c fa C A lVJ C 6. O r L N t a) fa w C .E D C O U =_ = = o alt o < `€ E € 2E ° � 8 E88c8o c• V m U y (LA C C .0 ≤ Y x > 7 U p O J p = .0 0 10 d NaLLa` t oU U o .3 w E 0 c5 o `8 0 3 y 0 3 6 3 c 0000000 05 555 5 0 000 0 00000000000000000 000000000000000000 N N N N N N N N N NWO N N N N N N O O O 0 0 % aza to V W r r O W W V N T N M W W M (� f� N . . . . . N rsi gaga a N fa (a a fa a r O N M r r r r N N a .i a v ac o Z ti m E. 0. yC I' c O C C7 W +' al 0 l'• co O _ S � v` ,attjQQ � u fib a0 3 3u, 'li c te £ '—is Ocompq� v' c � rnE E o .� c 5� 11 ! HIJJII ! my m " � camv ,.,,k '� � � .2 aEia n2a EHWU9 ,Q � crnmme —mw39d flII: fluuit 76 cE .oE u �i o S' cQot 2 E $ m `u ,L' mm �,Joouc, auotgc`�, > € ww o a+ Y �i o+ 01 O� 01 01 OI .Kr }, o+ m 01 '� v+ al p+ o+ > ali cm al a > a a > > > a a a a a > a to > a a o> o. > > > m a > a a > o 888888888_ _ o 333 3383333383333383 0 ig a a) E >. >` a 3 c y - € t m € > . w u — E o u E To a L' a ¢ o a�i a tn o t...- m z g u Y le act c mmN o o@ r° alCia a o o .C1 E m y ayi a .ti 47; d p u 3 u a E \ a4i 3 .12 n `' 6 > > u m 5 crnv •- E. y� 3Lb o o in inE {_n .00 >. i, ryya u cN mu u A _ w > > ° w E O 6 u L 01 o U v o (a m m m A N u In = cL V1 OC m w Cll0 0 0 0 0 0 0 r O r 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N N N N N N N N NN N N 04 r m a7 cr r r O I� O O CO r - a a a s a a E2 N N N r - . r c•> r r r r r r 0 0 0 0 0 r r r 0 0 0 0 0 0 CI 1 ZZZZZO Z Z Z Z Z Z 0 0 0 0 Ny a a) a 3 in o a O. zw T fli E 0 L° ca '° �' a v E o m �` S 'r` VQ 52 12 0v rn v L v O a tong 0 t w a g r 0 c A'A c E 3o c 3 �ew E a u a C 8 a v ¢ c2oc �oo �j E � o ,� su '—° � E � z �e � � �, �0rn' � o`+ m c � Vo1 �'2 t d }/� ! E a E � o � o v � E f a' N 2 0)O Yu C. i0 C - IN InJ - N JTnuin 2 c mo m v .� gioou1cla '� 2 E ?'? $ m EZ' 3ogaE) , E ,„ 5co E �6- go10Ct uii, aacw, E, °�'� au anc g tuE 2 Hlogo o ; n a o a > a n c > S °°> a > °O> a a a °°> o 1O t0 @ @ t0 MO t0 t0 �O 43 �O %° t0 t0 tG iD t0 �O 4O co �o `O cO v) V1 u) 6 sO t0 'D t0 000000000,00, 0000000000000 00000000 S CD 6 o 6 o IT I.0.1 E tn in ufga � ;O.8 c 0 G. 2 o ° f v � � f o tf• o o .,... 0 , y °' "C g le n 523 � c222 a o f o z 0 2 S E T °3) r � J - � -6 o o E E w o o E.E n E �n t _ o o F tr$ 2rz ¢ c`� v) � ro c mtm 2rz _ C7 — aQUmu m 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O 0O 0O 0O O Q O N O. O O O i r O A N O) r N O t f7 O) , r r ` r v.- O O O C a O - O) • a O r r r a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 _ co O O - - .-I a ci c 1 C a T.3 2 c ago" V' °Ji E a c tc E o w Q-c w Z. E � y rcEs � ti � a m E 7 N w 3 ru O 3 f m z. C i- N 1E0 in N N ≤ C fa y� oi in G I y — v _ 01 01 E6E ' ra0. m ° mEr: 37Eia � au 9i E0 ° 1t° `8irne � Q10 ° E ° i3intincc 0 t 0 f a 0 3s m � r.. r1 :raicoGs 0 -50t5 ,t G ca m uo ea c mcv w u E to 3 E a E to m „ Y °�37 � �rYL (a E o 1° � � o E cu w c c c m V o eg QS 1i w >a J J 2 !° n rs m O Mi !° m c J CO a a .5 Et, d 0 Y Y Y Y Y Y ° Y Y Y Y cn > °> 'asp/eat ° ° cn n ° n cn a a n n n a > 0 0 o n cn n n > a n a 1p l0 10 IA V1 Y'1 in to ILA V1 IA IA It) IA IA IA Il1 IA 1A IA IA V1 IA IA Ill IA in IA IA IA Y1 Y1 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O co' a O O O O O O O O o O O O O O C c vi YJ O a Si a 3 u � 6 a @ .C y E a y 8 n E -0 VILI in 10 0en 0 0 0 y a1 a2°i v c •g '�° c` • c V 01 4 ro a y m $ o a a d 'O y t? 0 = E (7(�� 7 yayk� t_ pl > in MI > C N O .cu ut7�� yAy V= c al C mu' Q Q O •N N V IL >- V ce Q L Ob U U fa u. L cc d . CO In V a C7 O O OO6OOOOO O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O N N N N N N N O N N O 0000r ino o vo' aC �' va , 00 col0000 O O O O N N O O '- r r p1 co co O 01 O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 rnrn ao. 0) = aoaao 0100) 01 rn rn• 1rn ti. Y rat 1V U) cc)N N N N N _ _ N 0 10 7 •-7�.--,4•7••-7� 16 CO7 7 EXHIBIT E tn:tM4lfi1 KCNC Service in Northern Colorado KCNC-TV opened the Northern Bureau in Fort Collins in 1981 in order to better serve viewers in Northern Colorado. The bureau"territory"primarily focuses on Larimer and Weld Counties, including the cities of Loveland, Greeley and Fort Collins. The bureau has a full time 2-person news crew and serves as a base of operation for other CBS4 crews that are often—on any given day- also working on reports in Northern Colorado. Wildfires During seasonal wildfires we tell residents what areas are in danger,who needs to evacuate, where evacuees can get help, and how other KCNC viewers can help people affected by the fire. Our news reports include maps, phone numbers for shelters, and specific fire weather forecasts. Example: Bobcat Gulch Fire—June 12, 2000—The fire started just north of Drake. Eight days later the fire was declared"contained"after burning 10,600 acres and destroying 22 structures -mostly homes. In the hours after the fire started we had several crews on the story. One crew(Northern Bureau)had found back roads to a ridgeline with a clear view of the fire line and which direction the wind was pushing it. Those images, coupled with reports from our helicopter gave residents crucial information about the path of what became the biggest fire in the history of the Roosevelt National Forest. In the following days KCNC relayed evacuation information, shelter locations, and the progress of the firefighting effort. Other Wildfires: Carter Lake 1/3/2006, Picnic Rock 4/2/04, Storm Mountain 3/3/06, Rist Canyon 4/26/00 Related wildfire reports: fire-proofing mountain homes,new"hotshot"crews, fire crew training, fire-risk from drought,re-seeding to prevent mudslides,water contamination from fire runoff, and Red Cross relief efforts. Wildfire facts: (source: Larimer County Website) "A recent study ranked Lorimer County as the most hazardous County in Colorado for wildfire hazards. An earlier report ranked Larimer County second. Both studies indicate the potential of wildfire to burn structures and threaten lives in the County is high and will only continue to grow as more and more people move to the mountains. A survey completed in 1995 by the Colorado State Forest Service estimates that 57%of subdivisions and other development in western Larimer County have a high fire loss potential. Fire loss potential combines the potential to burn (hazard) with the potential for ignition and the average fire size to estimate the likelihood of a devastating wildfire occurring in a community. Floodin Each June, melting snow in the high country brings the threat of flooding at lower elevations. Summer thunderstorms also cause flooding. In Northern Colorado,the Cache la Poudre River flows through Fort Collins and the Big Thompson River flows through Loveland. Both rivers meet in Greeley at the confluence with the South Platte River. Feeding these three rivers, there are an extraordinary number of smaller tributaries that are prone to flooding. KCNC combines experienced weather-casting with information from field crews and eyewitness accounts to determine where water is rising. Viewers of KCNC in northern Colorado use this information to protect their homes,businesses, and personal safety. Example: Spring Creek Flood—July 28, 1997—A summertime downpour turned into a deadly flood. Ten inches of rain fell in 5.5 hours. Five people died, another 40 people were injured. On the campus of Colorado State University the flood caused $20 million damage. KCNC provided shelter information, flood maps,ways for people to donate assistance and money, and ongoing follow-up coverage of Fort Collins effort to prevent similar devastation in the future. Other floods: Loveland 4/30/99, Weld Dam Breaks 5/5/99 Community Issues KCNC provides coverage of these issues prior to public meetings so that residents will be aware of the issues and able to participate in the public process. Here are just a few examples: Farming/Ranching: 5/11/06 farm wells shut off 5/8/06 expensive gas impact on farmers 2/27/06 farm worker shortage 10/28/00 farmers buy beet plant 4/02/07 dairy milk prices 10/00 beef grading camera 12/15/98 low hog prices Commnni*V ssues (cant'Q) Schools: 4/10/07 grade reconfiguration 5/16/06 Science kids 3/28/06 schools recycle construction waste 12/24/03 school soda machines Traffic/Roads: 2/6/01 roundabout plans 8/22/06 train crossing problems 1/07 new snowplow operations center 11/21/06 deer vs. cars warning 11/1/06 widening i-25 Environment: 3/14/01 new auto emissions program 1/10/01 emissions laws 1/2/01 wolf rescue controversy 12/7/00 chronic wasting disease 2/7/06 oil from algae Public Health West Nile Virus-KCNC produced numerous reports detailing the spread of WNV across Colorado—particularly in Northern Colorado. Larimer and Weld counties were among the hardest hit. Most important,KCNC produced ongoing reports about how residents could protect themselves from mosquito bites which spread West Nile Virus. In 2003,the peak outbreak thus far, West Nile killed 63 Coloradans and there were another 3,000 confirmed cases. Also, the Centers for Disease Control's Vector-Borne Infectious Diseases Division is based in Fort Collins and has been the subject of numerous reports on KCNC. Ongoing report topics include: updates on spread/movement of virus,personal safety, reducing mosquito populations, mosquito surveillance programs, follow-up stories with victims, putting WNV threat in perspective with other health threats, and concerns about risks of urban mosquito spraying. Public Health (cont'd) Chronic Wasting Disease-CWD is a deadly neurological disease found in deer and elk in Larimer and Weld Counties. It is related to Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease in humans and to "Mad Cow Disease." News reports on KCNC include: elk farm closures, deer testing, hunter testing program, risk comparison, economic impact, CWD in Rocky Mountain National Park, CWD research at Colorado State University Encephalitis—Two large college campuses in Larimer and Weld counties add increased risk of the spread of Meningococcal disease. News reports on KCNC include: outbreak information, availability of vaccine,how to protect yourself, antibiotics to protect students, publicize health department warnings. Elections Larimer and Weld Counties are included in Colorado's 4th Congressional District. Our Northern Bureau produces preview reports on all races and issues voters will face. In addition, we provide live coverage of election night returns and reaction, typically from congressional campaign headquarters. 4th Congressional District Races covered: 2006 Marilyn Musgrave vs Angie Paccione 2004 Marilyn Musgrave vs Stan Matsunaka 2002 Marilyn Musgrave vs Stan Matsunaka 2000 Bob Schaffer 1998 Bob Schaffer Sports KCNC is a leader in coverage of Colorado State University athletic events.We provide live post-game coverage of all CSU football games. In addition, we have traveled to nearly all Bowl Game appearances. 12/29/97 Holiday Bowl 12/31/99 Liberty Bowl 12/29/00 Liberty Bowl 12/18/01 New Orleans Bowl 12/31/02 Liberty Bowl 12/31/03 San Francisco Bowl Hello