Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20070934.tiff Esther Gesick _From: Dave Long ant: Monday, April 02, 2007 2:25 PM i o: Esther Gesick Subject: FW: Proposed Dairy Original Message From: Allisen Brisben [mailto:abrisben@hotmail.com] Sent: Friday, March 23, 2007 6:03 PM To: Dave Long Subject: Proposed Dairy I hope strongly that you with deny the request to put a large dairy near a Golf Course and subdivision. I live in the Hawkstone Subdivision. I would be forced to relocate and stop being a memeber to the Eaton Country club if this dairy is put in. I feel that a dairy of this size and magnitude will be, smelly, dirty and increase health risk such as allergy and asthma flair ups. There is no way that all of those animal could be properly care for and cleaned up after. I grew up in Montana where they use open range for cattle and don't confine them to small pens where the animals are packed in on top of each other. I hope you will take into consideration the damage and monetary loss that may impact the Eaton Country Club. There is no need to store that many cattle in one location this close to a town or subdivsion. thanks for your time and consideration. Concerned Hawkstone resident. EXHIBIT 1 2007-0934 -1)7), USC hk/583 Page 1 of 1 Esther Gesick From: Rob Masden Sent: Monday, April 02, 2007 3:34 PM To: Esther Gesick Subject: FW: Please vote against the DeHaan Dairy proposal From: KENNETH W VANCE [mailto:mvance2000@msn.com] Sent: Monday, April 02, 2007 2:25 PM To: Dave Long; Douglas Rademacher; Rob Masden; Bill Jerke; William Garcia Subject: Please vote against the DeHaan Dairy proposal Gentlemen, My name is Ken Vance and my wife, Mary, and I live in the Hawkstone subdivision of Eaton. We are asking that you vote against the DeHaan Dairy proposal as it is much too close to the towns of Ault and Eaton. My wife and I are lifelong residents of Weld County and are quite aware of the importance of agriculture to the people of Weld County. However, this dairy cannot be considered in that vein as it is simply big business, and such should be subject to the same scrutiny as any other type of manufacturing plant. The odor and additional truck traffic on already overburdened county roads should not be tolerated. Thank you for your consideration, Ken and Mary Vance 1307 Swainson Road Eaton, Colo 80615 EXHIBIT 4/3/2007 Page 1 of 1 Esther Gesick From: John Nuspl [Ipsunj@hotmail.com] Sent: Monday, April 02, 2007 5:42 PM To: Esther Gesick; Bill Jerke; William Garcia; Douglas Rademacher; Dave Long; masden@co.weld.co.us Subject: DeHanan proposed dairy Dear Sirs: As residents of Hawkstone we are writing to express our opinion on the aforementioned proposed dairy's location which is adjacent to our home. We support economic development and agriculture but feel the dairy's location should be in a more remote location. There are numerous locations in the hinterlands of Weld county that would be satisfactory for such a business venture. The odor and subsequent property devaluation would bring a negative impact to our Hawkstone property, therefore, necessitate our seeking to relocate, if this proposal is approved. Please consider the wishes of the masses as you deliberate on this important proposal. Thank you for your consideration. John & Lou Gen Nuspl It's tax season, make sure to follow these few simple tips Check it out! EXHIBIT 1 FE 4/3/2007 Esther Gesick —.From: Dave Long ant: Tuesday, April 03, 2007 9:11 AM 1O: Esther Gesick Subject: FW: DeHann Dairy vote. Original Message From: Lester Ewegen [mailto:ljewegen@earthlink.net] Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2007 7:04 AM To: Dave Long Cc: Bill Jerke; William Garcia Subject: DeHann Dairy vote. 04/03/07 We are les and Judith Ewegen, our address is 37615 WCR 39. We are strongly opposed to a large dairy with-in two miles from our home. We agree the county needs to provide space for the agriculture industry, but this area has become a residential area which is not compatible with the smell, dust, and traffic associated with a commercial dairy. For the reasons listed above, we urge your vote against the location of this dairy at hiway 14 and road 39. Sincerely Les and Judith Ewegen EXHIBIT 1 1 Page 1 of 1 Esther Gesick From: Rob Masden Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2007 9:12 AM To: Esther Gesick Subject: FW: USR-1583, DeHaan Dairy From: Alissa Kendall [mailto:kendalaa@hotmail.com] Sent: Monday, April 02, 2007 7:54 PM To: Dave Long; Douglas Rademacher; Rob Masden; Bill Jerke; William Garcia Subject: USR-1583, DeHaan Dairy Dear Gentlemen, I am writing to convey my most adamant opposition to the proposed 8,000 head dairy operation at the intersection of WCR 39 and WCR 80 (case number USR-1583). I am a resident of the Hawkstone community,just to the south of the proposed dairy site. We chose to purchase a home in this area, in part, because of the rural setting. However, placing a livestock facility of this magnitude so near an established residential area seems inappropriate and incompatible. I have very serious concerns that this will impact the value of my home, as no one will want to live in a neighborhood plagued with the problems such a massive dairy can cause. If you have ever been around a dairy farm, you know about the overwhelming number of flies. This may seem like a diminutive issue, but the cumulative effect of their waste is atrocious (and very difficult to clean) not to mention a serious health concern, both from the diseases the insects carry themselves as well as the pesticides needed to keep them under control! Furthermore, we would have to face other problems such as water and air pollution, detestable odor, dust and extensive truck traffic. None of these conditions are conducive to raising a family, as many of us in the Hawkstone community are trying to do. Had we known we would be moving in to a situation where our health and comfort would be traded for filth and stench, I assure you we would have built a home elsewhere. Please do not put my community in jeopardy. Weld County should not mix land uses in this way. Placing a dairy of this size so near a growing neighborhood is inappropriate and wrong. I urge the county to deny this proposal and protect the families in Hawkstone. Most sincerely, Alissa Kendall McEachern 670 Red Tail Drive Eaton, CO 80615 (970) 454-3102 Mortgage rates near historic lows. Refinance $200,000 loan for as low as $77l/month* EXHIBIT 1 >yN 4/3/2007 USia#/58-3 Page 1 of 1 Esther Gesick From: Rob Masden Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2007 9:12 AM To: Esther Gesick Subject: FW: Proposed DeHaan Dairy From: STAN JUDY A HORN [mailto:sjhorncol@msn.com] Sent: Monday, April 02, 2007 8:46 PM To: Dave Long; Douglas Rademacher; Rob Masden; Bill Jerke; William Garcia Subject: Fw: Proposed DeHaan Dairy Original Message From: STAN JUDY A HORN To: dlong@weld.co.us ; drademacher@weld.co.us ; rmasden@weld.co.us ; bjerke@weld.co.us ; wgarcia@weld.co.us Sent: Saturday, March 31, 2007 12:44 PM Subject: Proposed DeHaan Dairy Dear Board of County Commissioners, - We are voicing our concerns and anxiety about the proposed DeHaan dairy. We live in the Hawkstone Subdivision and cannot believe that this issue is even on your agenda! This is a subdivision in which houses are valued from the $200,000's to $900,000's and to even conceive of putting a Huge dairy with it's attendant smells, flies and truck traffic within a few blocks boggles our mind. We moved here from Mesa, AZ and there was a dairy in our subdivision before we moved in. Fortunately it was closed when we lived there. Our neighbors told us about the huge masses of flies and smells they had while it was running. They said it was a horror story. There was also a dairy about five miles from the Superstition Mall in Mesa, and when we got out of our car to go into the mall we made the comment about the "Dairy Air" and made a mad dash to get indoors as it was pretty powerful even from that distance. We cannot believe that you want a dairy next door to a subdivision which is planning to expand in that direction. What this would do for home sales and re-sales we cannot even imagine. How would you like a dairy of that size in your back yards? Please think hard about this issue and we beg all of you, use common sense and vote this issue down! Sincerely, Stan and Judy Horn 1360 Swainson Rd. Eaton, CO 80615 EXHIBIT TT 4/3/2007 Page 1 of 1 Esther Gesick From: DOUGLAS A HALL [hall_ds@msn.com] Sent: Sunday, April 01, 2007 7:33 PM To: Esther Gesick Subject: Docket#2007-18 OPPOSITION OF MARGARET DEHANN PROPOSED DAIRY This message is from Douglas and Susan Hall residing at 348 Hickory Ave which is located in Eaton Commons development of Eaton, Colorado. We are in agreement with the Weld County Planning Commission that has recommended that the proposed dairy operation for this area be DENIED. We believe that there are more appropriate areas for this type of operation than this location. We chose to buy in Eaton because of its potential to be a pleasant and quiet place to enjoy are retirement. We love the small community atmosphere and for the most part fresh air that surrounds Eaton. Yes, we knew this was a farming area and a few small feed lots in the area but with development of the several housing areas felt this was going to be a growing area but not on the edge of an 8,000 head dairy. Our concerns include, of course, the smell but also the traffic on CR 39 and our property values. Eaton Commons is an affordable place for families to purchase homes and raise their children. A large operation such as proposed dairy would be detrimental to already lower property values and will create driving hazards for anyone using CR 39 and other area roads. An 8,000 head dairy is not a normal agriculture use for our area. It is big business and should NOT be allowed in a low impact agriculture/suburban area. We urge you NOT approve this operation for this area just as the Weld County Planning Commission voted on December 5, 2006. Don't let Eaton become another "Gilcrest" in Weld County and help us to maintain and pursue a healthy quality of life for our expanding community. Respectfully, Douglas and Susan Hall EXHIBIT I TT 4/3/2007 .. ..__.... .. ......... Page 1 of 1 Esther Gesick From: William Garcia Sent: Monday, April 02, 2007 1:49 PM To: Esther Gesick Subject: FW: DeHaan Dairy From: PBL61155@aol.com [mailto:PBL61155@aol.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2007 2:16 PM To: William Garcia Subject: DeHaan Dairy Bill, The proposal for a dairy the size of the DeHaan Dairy does not seem logical in the suggested area. In addition to the cities nearby the Eaton Country Club, there are many people from Fort Collins, Windsor, Greeley, and other areas who use the facility for business and social activities. We would discourage the acceptance of the dairy in this area. Thank you for your consideration. Billie Lesh AOL now offers free email to everyone. Find out more about what's free from AOL at AOL..com. EXHIBIT I KK 4/3/2007 Page 1of1 Esther Gesick From: Dave Long Sent: Monday, April 02, 2007 2:24 PM To: Esther Gesick Subject: FW: DeHaan Dairy USR-1583 From: PBL61155@aol.com [mailto:PBL61155@aol.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2007 2:10 PM To: Dave Long Subject: DeHaan Dairy USR-1583 Dave, We are very concerned about the possibility of the proposed dairy. The location is in an area that is established with small farms and is near the existing Eaton Country Club. The prevailing winds tend to be from a direction that would impact an area that is used for business and social activities for many groups from Greeley, Eaton and Northern Colorado. The list of members contains many individuals from that area and also quite a few from Cheyenne, Fort Collins and Windsor. It would seem that this is not an ideal location for the dairy. Thanks for your consideration. Peck and Billie Lesh AOL now offers free email to everyone. Find out more about what's free from AOL at AOL.com. EXHIBIT LL USE #/5s3 4/3/2007 Esther Gesick --From: WILLIAM MAURY HEISS [mlbheiss@msn.com] ant: Monday, April 02, 2007 1:05 PM fo: Esther Gesick Subject: DeHaan Dairy Hearing We are strongly opposed to the possibility of the 8, 000 head dairy locating east of Ault. Such an operation locating so close to some very nice housing would be a health hazard and would decrease property values. Monfort Feed Lots moved east and south. Why can't this operation do the same? Sincerely, William and Maury Leigh Heiss 1485 Falcon Ridge Rd. Eaton, CO 80615 EXHIBIT mM Page 1 of 1 Esther Gesick From: Dave Long Sent: Monday, April 02, 2007 1:31 PM To: Esther Gesick Subject: FW: Proposed hearing on 8000 cow DeHaan Dairy USR-1583 From: JPeter1218@aol.com [mailto:JPeter1218@aol.com] Sent: Monday, April 02, 2007 8:33 AM To: Dave Long Subject: Proposed hearing on 8000 cow DeHaan Dairy USR-1583 Dear Commissioner Long: My husband, Clarence E. Brown and myself, M. June Petersen own and live at 800 Hawkstone Dr., #11, Eaton, CO. We wish to take this opportunity to express our concern regarding the above referenced issue. We purchased property in Eaton and moved here from Greeley in 2001. One of the reasons was to escape the volume of people living in Greeley, and to avoid the noted "smell"that goes along with living in Greeley. Although we are not immune to the smell in Eaton, we feel that the proposed dairy would bring about problems that we have tried to avoid by moving from Greeley. Highway 39 is only a two lane highway and is not equipped to handle a large amount of traffic. There is already agriculture within the area consisting of cattle and occasionally we do get an odor from them. We feel that adding an additional 8,000 cattle will generate more traffic and odor. Regardless of what the owners say about taking all the proper methods to eliminate the smell, it CANNOT be avoided by any means. We attended the hearing which was held at the Planning and Zoning Board, which they voted to deny the proposal, and were informed by a resident that the area proposed lies within the urban growth plan for the Town of Eaton. Please consider our objection when placing your vote on this proposal. It is our opinion that a yes vote will definitely affect the people, the property values and the air in which the residents in Hawkstone live. A nay vote from you would be appreciated. Thank you for accepting our views and concerns. Sincerely, M. June Petersen Clarence E. Brown See what's free at AOL.com. EXHIBIT 1 n1 4/3/2007 Page 1 of 1 Esther Gesick From: Dave Long Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2007 9:21 AM To: Esther Gesick Subject: FW: OPPOSED TO DeHAAN DAIRY From: R Fred DeVore [mailto:rfd@peterbiltwy.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2007 9:19 AM To: Dave Long Cc: Douglas Rademacher; Rob Masden; Bill ]erke; William Garcia Subject: OPPOSED TO DeHAAN DAIRY Commissioners; My wife and I are strongly opposed to the proposed DeHaan Dairy. I built her a house in the Hawkstone subdivision of Eaton less than 1 year ago, and we certainly would not have done so if we would have known such a dairy was being proposed. We feel the insects, odor, wastewater, lighting and noise pollution would have a great negative effect on our property values and our neighborhood in general. In addition, the increased truck traffic on County Rd 35 would be nuisance as well as dangerous. With all the vacant property in Weld County farther to the East, there is no reason to locate a dairy this close to residential housing. If you have any questions, please contact my wife, Kim, at 970-454-2322, or myself at 307-631-2445. Thank you. R Fred DeVore EXHIBIT 1 00 4/3/2007 Esther Gesick .From: Dave Long ent: Tuesday, April 03, 2007 9:22 AM fo: Esther Gesick Subject: FW: Deliaan Dairy USR-1583 Original Message From: Dennis McKevitt [mailto:dmckevitt@sc.rr.com] Sent: Monday, April 02, 2007 2 :35 PM To: Dave Long Subject: DeHaan Dairy USR-1583 Mr. Long, we are owners in Hawkstone at 1485 Red Tail Road, Eaton, CO. While we realize the importance of dairy farming in the area, we believe there should now be more distance between such farms and the local residences that are building up in the area. If Eaton has any hope of growing and attacking new families or businesses it will have to better zone livestock farms to not interfere with the day to day lives of those living in the area. I believe we all know the area is farm land and we want and like that to continue, but to make it even more offensive to the smell is not the direction we who own and live in Eaton want to see things go. A farm with 8, 000 cows will simply add to this problem and drive people away. I assume this matter is even subject to approval because of the size of the herd and the unpleasantness of the noise and smell to those that live in the area. Please help those of us that own in the Hawkstone development to keep our homes and their values and don't force us out. Thanks for your consideration. EXHIBIT it Ii Sp #)5 3 Apr-O3-O7 1O:O7A P_O1 f hNTlri [PURINA CHOWS - PINTO . BEANS TM NORTHERN FEED & BEAN COMPANY Phone:(970)352-787.5 1-800-316-232o FAX: (970)352-7833 P.O. Box 149 LUCERNE,CO R0646 Weld County Commissioners March 29,2007 970-352-0242 To Whom It May Concern: Northern Feed & Bean is in support of Great Western Dairy's request to build a new dairy on their proposed site in the Eaton/Ault area. Robert W. Pemberton Northern Feed & Bean EXHIBIT u see 417583 Apr 03 2007 4: 01PM The Dairy Ruthority, LLC (970) 351-8134 p. 2 A The Dairy Authority, LLC 7 8215 W.20*St,Suite A Greg Goodell, DVM Greeley,Colorado 80634 Scott T.Smith,DVM Ph:970.351.8102 Fax:970.351.8134 Chris Koeller,DVM URL:W W W.DaityMD.com To Weld County Commissioners, This letter is in reference to the permit request for the DeHaan family to build a dairy near Ault. I am a veterinarian who has been in dairy practice in Greeley and Weld County for 15 years. Our practice consists of myself,partner Greg Goodell and 5 employees.Our livelihood depends on dairy producers staying in business in the local area.In order for this to happen,families like the DeHaan's need to continue to grow their business in order to survive in times of low margins like we are currently experiencing.Weld County has a strong agricultural history and we would like to see that continue.As you probably already know,each dollar that is generated on a dairy farm is multiplied five to seven times through the local community.This adds up to a significant positive economic impact for the local economy. We have done business with the DeHaan family for the past 3 years on various levels. They are exceptional dairy producers and stewards of livestock. They have committed significant time, money and thought into the planning of their dairy site.Casey DeHaan has training and experience in dairy facility design and site selection. I know the plan for the facility is intended to take advantage of the natural contour of the terrain and have minimal impact on the surrounding area. I would appreciate your consideration of our support for this project to go forward as proposed. We need to keep high caliber producers such as the DeHaan family in our area.Thanks for your consideration. Sincerely, 1.1 Scott T Smith DVM EXHIBIT With specialists in Dairy Management Systems,Milk Quality Lab.Reproduction.Finance and Nutrition __� _ Page 1 of 1 Esther Gesick From: Bill Jerke Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2007 9:11 AM To: Esther Gesick Subject: FW: Opposition of the proposed DeHaan Dairy From: Kate Hodgson [mailto:khodgson@electsys.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2007 8:31 AM To: Dave Long; Douglas Rademacher; Rob Masden; Bill Jerke; William Garcia Subject: Opposition of the proposed DeHaan Dairy I am writing to oppose the proposed DeHaan Dairy application. I am a resident of the Hawkstone Housing Development and a member of the Eaton Country Club. I travel county road 39 daily in my commute to Fort Collins for work. My major concerns regarding the location of this 8,000 head facility are as follows: • the impacts to the roadways and traffic conditions • the impact to the water tables and contamination considerations • the general concerns of fly and pest implications to homeowners and the local bar and lounge at the Eaton Country Club and the outdoor use of the course • nighttime light trespass and dark skies considerations for neighbors • loss of property value to the adjacent property owners and their frustrations of dealing with such an impacting new neighbor Thank you for the opportunity to have stated my opposition. Kate Hodgson 1475 Hawkridge Road Eaton, CO 80615 970-454-2870 4/4/2007 �3o 7-0931 3 April, 2007 Weld Board of County Commissioners Mr. Rob Masden; I request you not approve the DeHaan Dairy's permit for several reasons. A corporation is a legal figment having the rights and responsibilities of a person: but in practice heavy on rights, negligent of responsibilities. Numerous examples exist their only responsibility of importance is to the corporate bottom line, with a willingness to sacrifice safety and health to corporate profit: tobacco, asbestos, timber and mining corporations come to mind - and last summer's E-coli outbreak traced to a corporate dairy farm in California. The dairy's disregard for community reactions to this proposed location a significant sign of their lack of community interest and responsibility. A dairy in that location would stress the roads and highway requiring expenditures of state and county taxes to improve and maintain. According to a billboard on CR 39, water is a valuable resource to be "bought, sold, rented". There is only a finite supply already over-committed, eastern farmers forbidden to use well water and the projected residential growth making ever greater demands. A new dairy is not a responsible use of such resource when it could be more appropriately located. And let's not forget the smell. Unlike light and sound, which travel in rays and waves, odors are particulates - what you smell is exactly what you get. I knew when moving here there were feed lots in the area - one right across the street. Nose wrinkling on the occasional ripe morning expected, but not the multiplication of that ripeness. Weld invited us urban types by approving several large housing developments; it should not now allow the unnecessary increase of noxious odors. Several groups have announced their opposition to the dairy. A responsible response would have been to contact those groups and seek to allay concerns. The dairy did send a letter to the Hawkstone HOA requesting such meeting. Hawkstone replied in the affirmative, but the dairy did not further pursue the meeting: not the action of a responsible entity. Is it not significant the Planning Commission unanimously disapproved the requested permit? A dairy at that location would be a deterrent to further residential development and a corresponding decrease to the potential tax base; and to those of us here it would present an immediate decline in property values. It is curious why the dairy decided on the location it did; many others present fewer challenges. This is not a case of urban vs. rural. We have matured beyond that confrontational mentality; recent development shows both can peacefully coexist, even cooperate. The dairy confronts, not cooperates. It has ignored community concerns, abandoned local responsibility, would add to stress on land, standard of living, natural resources, and public coffers. Respectfully, James Crabtree 1269 Swainson Road Eaton, CO 80615 r Page 1 of 2 Esther Gesick From: Rob Masden Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2007 9:18 AM To: Esther Gesick Subject: FW: OPPOSE DEHAAN DAIRY Attachments: Weld County Planning Commission.doc From: Roger Schulz [mailto:rogerschulzcpa@slbbi.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2007 10:43 PM To: Bill Jerke; Douglas Rademacher; Rob Masden; Dave Long; William Garcia Subject: OPPOSE DEHAAN DAIRY Gentlemen Please read my letter that I wrote to the Planning Commission as to why you should not approve DeHaan Dairy. We are opposed to the DeHaan Dairy locating at the propose location. PLEASE DO NOT ALLOW THIS DAIRY TO BUILD IN THIS LOCATION! THERE IS WAY TOO MUCH OPPOSITION TO THIS PROPOSAL. PLEASE VOTE RESPONSIBLY. THERE IS A CONCENTRATION OF FEEDLOTS IN THIS VICINTY. THE FLY PROBLEM AND THE ODOR PROBLEM IS ALREADY BEING IGNORED BY WELD COUNTY. PLEASE DO NOT ADD TO THE PROBLEM. PLEASE READ MY LETTER TO THE PLANNING COMMISION. Thank you. Roger Schulz Roger L. Schulz, CPA Schulz and Leonard, P.C. 200 First Street Eaton, Colorado 80615 Phone: 970-454-3371 Fax: 970-454-3465 Roger(te SchulzandLeonard.com www.SchulzandLeonard.com r-. U lt. Alraa 4/4/2007 Roger and Aleta Schulz 18979 Weld County Road 78 P.O. Box 367 Eaton, Colorado 80615 December 4, 2006 Ms. Hanna Hippely, Planner Department of Planning Services 918 10th Street Greeley, Colorado 80631 Re: Margaret DeHaan Case#USR-1583 Site Specific Development Plan and Special Review Permit Dear Ms. Hippely This letter is to express our views concerning the location of the 8,000 head dairy that is being proposed for Weld County Road 39, northeast of Eaton. The concerns that we have are as follows: 1. The planning commission has approved several residential sites within close proximity to where the proposed dairy is going to be placed. The planning commission has also approved a site for a church to be placed within about 1 mile of the proposed dairy site. Does Weld County have a Comprehensive Plan for this area and if so, does it make sense to allow an 8,000 head dairy to be located so close to these new residential lots, the Eaton Country Club and the Town of Eaton's Hawkstone residential subdivision? 2. Weld County Road 39 is a highly traveled road. Although we understand that there was a traffic count, it was taken in June, at a slow time of the year. There is sugar beet dump located across WCR 39 to the west which creates an enormous amount of traffic. There are several months during the year that there is a lot of traffic, especially during harvest. We do not believe that the road or the bridges would be able to handle the several thousands of trucks per year that will be going in and out of this dairy. There are many residential accesses to WCR 39, as well as 2 major residential subdivisions, and the main entrance to the Eaton County Club. We believe that the increase in traffic would be unsafe for the people that live and drive this road. 3. There are already several (at least 4) feedlots within about a 1 mile radius of the proposed dairy site. Each of these feedlots are already feeding several thousand head of livestock. Weld County has made no attempt or at least no progress in the last several years to deal with the severe dust problems, fly problems or odor problems that these existing facilities create. To approve this special use permit would just exponentially multiply these problems. We would encourage the Planning Commission to not approve this application for the Site Specific Development Plan and Special Review Permit. At the very least, the Planning Commission should not approve this permit until the applicants comply with all of the requirements are met and specify in detail how the fly problems, dust problems, odor problems and ground water contamination will be dealt with. For them to say that they will deal with these issues "per existing industry practices"is too vague. We understand that Weld County is a"right to farm"county. That is one of the reasons we live here. We are not opposed to the dairy locating in Weld County, however this is a poor choice for a location. Just because this is a"right to farm" county does not mean that there should be a blatant disregard for the existing neighbors and future growth of this area. We think, that for the planning commission to allow this dairy to locate at this site would be irresponsible and, at the very least, poor fiscal management. Sincerely, Roger and Aleta. Schulz ‘70 '(' aim r MEMORANDUM Wi`ge TO: Board of County Commissioners COLORADO DATE: April 4, 2007 FROM: Hannah Hippely SUBJECT: USR -1583 — Resolution Changes Staff is requesting that the following changes be made to the resolution. 1. Insert Development Standard which reads: Signs shall adhere to Article IV Division 2 of the Weld County Code as it related to signs in the A (Agricultural) Zone District" as #25 and renumber accordingly. (Insert as #25 and renumber accordingly) No 2. Development Standard #23 shall be amended to read: The applicant shall adhere to the approved lighting plan. Sources of light shall be shielded so that light rays will not shine directly onto adjacent properties where such would cause a nuisance or interfere with the use on the adjacent properties. 3. Add as a Condition under Prior to Recording the Plat: The applicant shall submit a Landscape/Screening Plan to the Department of Planning Services for review and approval. The applicant shall place "plant material" or other landscaping to mitigate the impacts of the facility from adjacent properties. The plant material or other screening shall be placed between the road right-of-way and the proposed improvements. The buffer strip shall be a minimum of ten (10) feet in width and run the length of the property line. Upon approval, the Landscape/Screening Plan shall be placed on the plat. ` 4. Amend Development Standard #24 to read: The applicant shall adhere to the proposed Landscaping/Screening Plan. Landscaping and Screening materials as indicated in the approved plan shall be maintained at all times. Dead or diseased plant materials shall be replaced with materials of similar quantity and quality at the earliest possible time. 5. Add the following Development Standard: The property owner acknowledges that mineral owners and lessees have real property interests that entitle them to surface use in accordance with Colorado State Statutes and applicable Colorado oil and Gas Conservation Commission regulations. 6. Add the Following Development Standard: The property owner shall allow any mineral owner the right of ingress or egress for the purposes of exploration development, completion,recompletion, re-entry,production and maintenance operations associated with existing or future operations located on these lands. 7. Add the Following Development Standard: The secondary access is to be utilized in harvest season only and shall be gated at all other times. EXHIBIT I lAS ' I : _ 8. Prior to Recording the Plat Condition C6. shall be amended to read: Spaces reserved for the parking of vehicles and all loading zones shall be delineated on the plat. This facility shall adhere to the number of on-site parking spaces indicated in Appendix 23-B of the Weld County Code. The total number of on-site parking for this facility shall be thirty one (31)spaces. In accordance with Section 23-3-350.B,Section 23-3-350.C,Section 23-3-350.D and Section 23-4-30.C all parking, loading areas and street access drives shall be surfaced with recycled asphalt, gravel, recycled concrete, asphalt, concrete or an equivalent material. The plat shall delineate the location and type of surfacing material. Each parking space shall be equipped with wheel guards or curb stops when necessary to prevent vehicles from extending beyond the boundaries of the space and from coming into contact with other vehicles, walls, fences, or plantings. The location of all curb stops in the parking areas per Section 23-4-30.D of the Weld County Code shall be delineated on the plat. 9. The following should be inserted as Prior to Recording the Plat Condition C7 : The applicant has realigned their main/primary entrance to the dairy directly across from the existing access point as suggested. The primary access shall be hard surfaced concrete or asphalt with adequate turning radiuses to accommodate large milk trucks for a minimum of 50 feet and match the edge of the pavement. The purpose of the hard surface is to keep the edge of the pavement from breaking away and from tracking mud or debris on to the asphalt surface.The plat shall delineate the location and type of surfacing material. 10. Prior to Recording the Plat Condition C7 (as it is currently numbered) shall be amended to read: The applicant shall make a reasonable attempt to meet the requirements of the American with Disabilities Act (ADA) and comply with ADA standards for this facility. Two (2) non-ambulatory / ambulatory parking spaces shall be identified on the plat. The parking space must be the closest possible to the entrance. Should the applicant elect to not adhere to the previously discussed Federal Standards,this office requests that the applicant outline how their proposed site design mitigates the requirements of the American's with Disabilities Act. N 11. Prior to Recording the Plat Condition F. shall be moved to a Condition required Prior to Operation; insert the following. 4. Prior to Operation A. Provide documentation, prepared by a Colorado Registered Professional Engineer,that all wastewater impoundments for the confined animal feeding operation (CAFO)will meet seepage rate standards of Colorado Water Quality Control Commission Regulation 81 [81.5(2)]. Evidence of approval by the Department of Public Health and Environment shall be provided to the Department of Planning Services. (Department of Public Health and Environment) 12. Amend Development Standard #5. to read: The facility shall operate in compliance with Colorado Water Quality Control Commission Regulation Number 81. Documentation, prepared by a Colorado registered professional engineer, shall be provided in evidence that all wastewater impoundments for the confined animal feeding operation (CAFO) will meet seepage rate standards of the above stated regulation. The documentation of compliance shall be submitted to the Weld County Department of Public Health and Environment and Department of Planning Services prior to operation of the facility. (Department of Public Health and Environment) 13. Correct the numbering of the Resolution to address the fact that we have , Under the Condition "Prior to Recording the Plat"two letter Cs, and to account for any changes made today. Hello