HomeMy WebLinkAbout20072276.tiff Page 1 of 1
Esther Gesick
From: Kim Ogle
Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2007 5:10 PM
To: Esther Gesick
Subject: FW: Holton Lakes Permit(USR 1608)
Please add to case file. Concerns from CDOT have been resolved per this e-mail from Joe Intermill, CDOT
Consultant
Kim Ogle Planning‘1mrv.c,
'F:970.356.4000 x 35491 F:970 304 6498
Weld County Planning Services-Greeley Office
918 Tenth Street Greeley CO 80631 1 kogle{alco.weld.co.us
From: JSI3841@aol.com [mailto:JSI3841@aol.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2007 5:07 PM
To: Kim Ogle
Cc: Gary.DeWitt@DOT.State.CO.US; bill.timmons@boral.com; mjhart0l@gmail.com
Subject: Holton Lakes Permit (USR 1608)
Kim:
This is to notify you that it appears CDOT's concerns over the Holton Lakes Gravel pit and Water Storage
Permit have been addressed and resolved.
Gary DeWitt CDOT Region 4 Materials Engineer, and I reviewed the Rational of Approval of Application Over
Objections, published by the Colorado Division of Reclamation, Mining &Safety. We then met on site with Bill
Timmons, General Manager of Boral Aggregates, and Mike Hart, Hart Enviromental. We subsequently reached
an agreement of drainage issues and excavation set back distances from US Highway 85 and SH 52.
Considering this agreement and the conditions stated in the revised permit application, we filed a Party Status
Withdrawal Form with DRM&S and withdrew as an Objecting Party to the Permit Application.
Based on the revised Excavation Set Back requirements and drainage stipulations stated in the documents
mentioned in the paragraph above, we also request that The Weld County Planning Department withdraw
CDOT's name as an objecting party to Weld County granting the Holton Lakes Permit, USR 1608.
Thank you for your cooperation in this matter and the assistance you have given us during this process.
Joe A. Intermill, Jr.
Consultant for Colorado Department of Transportation.
Get a sneak peek of the all-new AOL.com.
EXHIBIT
Usk*Rea
8/8/2007 r77�
a a,
v,,, :„...,#.
— HART ENVIRONMENTAL
PO. Bos I ura Boulder ( olor,rdo Sumo Pborre: t ).3. I I r 06O2
or,DI
weid Coa,'.r
August 9, 2007
C,((
Mr. Kim Ogle RE'.., _ D
Weld County Planning Department
918 10th Street
Greeley, CO 80631
RE: USR 1608 (Holton Lakes) Requested to Amend Resolution Docket#: 2007-65
Dear Kim:
My client, Ready Mixed Concrete Company (Ready Mixed) and Kerr-McGee have
been actively working to develop a Surface Use Agreement that meets the needs of all
parties. To that end, Ready Mixed desires to amend the language of condition I.K.on
page 6 of the resolution (2007-2263 PL 1921) drafted by the Clerk to the Board of the
Weld County Commissioners for USR 1608.
- Specifically,Ready Mixed desires to amend the fourth sentence of 1.K. as follows:
Section 22-5-100.A of the Weld County Code states, "oil and gas
exploration and production should occur in a manner which minimizes
the impact to agricultural uses and the environment and reduces the
conflicts between mineral development and current and future surface
uses." Section 22-5-100.B of the Weld County Code states "...encourage
cooperation, coordination and communication between the surface owner
and the mineral owner/operators of either the surface or the mineral
estate." Section 22-5-100.B.1 of the Weld County Code also states, "new
development should be planned to take into account current and future oil
and gas drilling activity to the extent oil and gas development can
reasonably be anticipated." The applicant shall either submit enter a
Surface Use Agreement with Kerr-McGee Oil & Onshore LP ("KMG")
pursuant to that certain Dispute Resolution Agreement dated August 9,
2007 between the applicant and KMG a copy of an agreement with the
property's mineral operators stipulating that the oil and gas activities have
been adequately incorporated into the design of the site or show evidence
that an adequate attempt has been made to mitigate the concerns of the
mineral owner/operators." Drill envelopes can be delineated on the plat
in accordance with the State requirements as an attempt to mitigate
concerns. The plat shall be amended to include any possible future
-_ drilling sites. (Department of Planning Services)
EXHIBIT
I
lase l bog
Mr. Kim Ogle
August 9, 2007
Page Two of Two
I look forward to discussing this letter and the proposed revisions to paragraph 1.K.,
as described above, with you during our meeting tomorrow morning.
Please do not hesitate to call me if you have any questions regarding this letter.
Sincerely,
Michael J. (Mike) Hart
Cc: by e-mail: Bill Timmons, ready Mixed Aggregates
Tommy Holton
Jeff Schwarz
Keith Crouch
Joe King
John Butera
August 15, 2007
To The Board of County Commissioners of Weld County
RE: Docket#: 2007-65
From: Sandra L. Neb
645 S. Grand Ave.
Ft. Lupton, Co 80621
I am writing to express my concerns as a person who owns property across Highway 85
from the proposed project. I have several concerns that I would encourage the
Commissioners to address and think seriously about. They are as follows:
• Traffic—Acceleration and deceleration lanes are a must on Highway 52.
The traffic is already heavy and this project will pose a serious safety
problem. Pearson Park is utilized heavily at certain times of the year
making these lanes a must. I don't know if this would be addressed in the
CDOT regulations and standards, but if not, PLEASE require this.
• E.P.A. air quality and permits are a necessity also.
• The ideal benefit for the city and homeowners along Highway 85 would
be a sound barrier on the east side of Highway 85. The sight, noise and
site lighting will be a deterrent for any future home sales for a
considerable amount of time. A cost sharing between the City of Ft.
Lupton, homeowners and the developers and CDOT might be a
possibility. If we can work cooperatively for a win- win situation for all
involved, it could be a model for others to follow.
• White noise ie: back up beepers installed under the vehicles and exhaust
that go down into the ground rather than up in the air would enhance the
operation also.
• Hours of operation should be addressed so it is not a 24 hour 7 day
operation.
I appreciate you taking the time to thoughtfully consider and hopefully implement some
of these requests.
Respectfully submitted,
Sandra L. Neb
EXHIBIT
Ust Roo
a > 4'! Kerr! Gee
o—
_Jr CD
w r e w August 14, 2007 Kerr-McGee Oil&Gas OnShore LP
it 0 rem (r 1999 Broadway.Suite 3700,Denver.Colorado 80202
0te-.a 303-296-3600•Fax 303-296-3601
VIA FACSIMILE AND U.S. MAIL
Weld County Board of County Commissioners
915 10`h Street
Greeley, Colorado 80631
Re: Ready Mixed Concrete Mineral Facility- Site Specific Development Hai
and Special Review Permit (Case No. USR-1608)
Ready Mixed Concrete Company - Applicant
Township 1 North, Range 66 West of the 6th P.M.
Section 6 & 7: Portions
Weld County, Colorado
Dear Mr. Ogle,
Kerr-McGee Oil & Gas Onshore LP ("KMG") is the owner of valid oil and gas
leases underlying all or part of Sections 6 & 7, Township l North, Range 66 West, for
which Ready Mixed Concrete Company ("Ready Mixed") is seeking approval. KMG has
executed a Dispute Resolution Agreement with Ready Mixed and supports the amended
Section 1.K of the Resolution of the Weld County Planning Commission. KMG is in the
process of negotiating with Ready Mixed a Surface Use Agreement, the terms of which
will govern the parties' simultaneous use of the subject property. KMG does not object to
the approval for which Ready Mixed is applying. However, the parties have not yet
concluded an agreement, and KMG therefore requests that the Weld County withhold
final approval of the plat until the parties execute and record a surface use agreement.
Sincerely,
Kerr-McGee Oil & Gas Onshore
C. /M-_--
ohn Butera
Landman
cc: Ready Mixed Concrete Company - Applicant
Joseph H. Lorenzo—Kerr-McGee Oil & Gas Onshore LP
= EXHIBIT
ifrit. .:
Page 1 of 1
Esther Gesick
From: Kim Ogle
Sent: Friday,August 17, 2007 3:33 PM
To: Esther Gesick
Subject: FW: Holton Lakes DRM&S Permit Approval Letter[USR-16081
Attachments: Permit Approval Ltr. 08.17.07.pdf
Kim Ogle I Planning Manager
T:970.356.4000 x 3549[F:970 304 6498
Weld County Planning Services-Greeley Office
918 Tenth Street[Greeley CO 80631 I kogle@co._weld.co,us
From: Michael Hart [mailto:mjhart0l@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, August 17, 2007 2:56 PM
To: Kim Ogle
Cc: Bill Timmons; Tom Holton; Tommy Holton
Subject: Holton Lakes DRM&S Permit Approval Letter
Kim:
Attached is the approval letter from the Colorado Division of Reclamation, Mining and Safety for
Holton Lakes ( Permit#M-2007-008, USR 1608).
Also, who is the audio-visual person at Weld County that I should contact regarding my Power Point
presentation to the Board of County Commissioners next Wednesday the 22nd? I'd like to have an
adequate amount of time to set-up and run through my slides before our case comes up. Of course I will
bring a laptop, but would like to know if there is any hardware I need to bring to link the computer to the
projector.
Thanks, Mike
Michael J. (Mike) Hart
Hart Environmental
(303)444-6602
EXI UBEr
use #10,
8/21/2007
AUG-1T-2001 08:82AV FROM-DIV RECLAMATION MINING 1 SAFETY 3938328102 T-2i3 P.001/001 F-004
_ n trvi t yr L..vLrvI v
DIVISION OF RECLAMATION,MINING AND SAFETY
Deoertment of Natural Re oucces
1313 Sherman Sl.,Room 213 COLORADO
Omn
i,Colorado 10203 — D 1 V,S t 0 J o a
M+one,003)066.3367 Aso. •
RECLAMATION
csx (303)0324106 post-ti1r�q Fax Note T 7671
INING
ra MI) Yt" ROM 4,4 (0021.1 SAFETY
camas e'1L eo. .DR"Ml I a!uam.l•.
August 17,2007 Mane a Phone s Governor
Fere t ni-11f�
l„I�+ Fenn Half if 0.Sh.nnn
Mr.Bill Timmons ddCC Y(1 Executive Obtain
Ready Mixed Conaretc Company Ronne W eummy
14585 Bri htonRoad &DivisionOM-'.
8 Neural Rgtnece,rucst
Brighton.CO 80641
Re: File No.M-2007-008,Holton Lake*, 112e Decision Letter-Financial and Performance Warranty Request
-Co'astrucilon Material Operation
• Dear Mr.Timmons:
On August 13,2007,the Division of Reclamation,Mining and Safety approved your 112e mining permit application,
The amount of financial warranty set by the Division for this operation is 5672,000.00. Please find the attached
reclamation cost estimate for further detail. You must submit a financial warranty in this amount and a performance
warranty in order for us to issue a permit. Jr.the event you have requested a financial warranty form,we have enclosed it
in this letter. If you have not,pine select a type of financial warranty from Rule 4,3. Then contact us so that we can
provide you with the appropriate warranty form. We have enclosed a performance warranty form with this letter nor your
use,
PI EASE NOTE THAT MINING OPERATIONS MAY NOT COMMENCE UNTIL A PERMIT HAS BEEN
ISSUED BY WIZ DIVISION AFTER RECEIPT OF YOUR FINANCIAL WARRANTY AND PERFORMANCE
WARRANTY. A PERMIT WILL NOT BE ISSUED UNTIL WE VERIFY THE ADEQUACY OF BOTH YOUR
FINANCIAL WARRANTY AND PERFORMANCE WARRANTY.
If you have any questions,please contact me at(303)8664943,
9ipcerciy,
yi 7 •
Erica S.Crosby /
Enviromncntal Protection Specialist
Enclosures)
cc: Mike Hart,Hart Environmental vv./enclosure(s)
Carl Mount,DRMS
Elizabeth Shelton,DBMS
Office of Office of
Mined Land Reclamation Drove, • Omni Junction • Owango Active and Inactive Mines
• BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS'
SIGN POSTING CERTIFICATE
THE LAST DAY TO POST THE SIGN IS AUGUST 10, 2007 THE SIGN SHALL BE POSTED
ADJACENT TO AND VISIBLE FROM A PUBLICALLY MAINTAINED ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY.
IN THE EVENT THE PROPERTY BEING CONSIDERED FOR A SPECIAL REVIEW IS NOT
ADJACENT TO A PUBLICALLY MAINTAINED ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY, THE DEPARTMENT
OF PLANNING SERVICES SHALL POST ONE SIGN IN THE MOST PROMINENT PLACE ON
THE PROPERTY AND POST A SECOND SIGN AT THE POINT AT WHICH THE DRIVEWAY
(ACCESS DRIVE) INTERSECTS A PUBLICALLY MAINTAINED ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY.
I, KIM OGLE, HEREBY CERTIFY UNDER PENALTIES OF PERJURY THAT THE SIGN WAS
POSTED ON THE PROPERTY AT LEAST TEN DAYS BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS HEARING FOR A SITE SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND A
SPECIAL REVIEW PERMIT FOR MINERAL RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT FACILITIES
INCLUDING A CONCRETE BATCH PLANT, A RECYCLED CONCRETE PLANT AND
GRAVEL MINING IN THE A (AGRICULTURAL) ZONE DISTRICT. [USR-1608]
KIM OGLE
N)a of Person Posting Sign
Signature of Person Posting Sign
STATE OF COLORADO
) ss.
COUNTY OF WELD
The foregoing instrument was subscribed and sworn to me this / day of 1/II I, )! , 2007.
WITNESS my hand and official seal. rJ7
Notary Public �� BILLIE J. MOORE
NOTARY PUBLIC
My Commission Expires: IMol i o STATE OF COLORADO
• EXHIBIT
6O
' +^`' , +.Li
g� r' q a. :: } 'l` k, is f- 84.-.(i
-` , ' .44.: i
% (
.• ; Pp. y58�,3 _ yt Y'. i r rt.,r' t _ i yR 1. '�� • 1y b. . L•.
L .t: ��y"",nn i 4 k j „ tiL; s �..
Ki
• 1yJ ' fib;• #,+x, *àt :
• .M'" T k: 11; t4,
t,i .K } $ 4 {.. .J },
II i
j[ A /�t ••
F r
. � ' 1,
1' ma_ 4 /MAY' f $fit F q Y 5
iii.lii.
2w
..,.:!:!:.c.... ..„,...el!, ,, ,.4. „!,, ,4,..„!,4.!!!. ..:„G'+ ..1111/ . r
047
s ,
J ..,
it 8 •111 Z d�" 7isi
•
,7
l 0
;Al • �• mil —O a .:: '.,.'_ 3471
3r31 d'+ �
�r •Z
xt dPt CC lala
ey } v a
•
a
.
3x
i. tpit
=.+pax ;�/ rJ p a •...°t₹" � "
E , i rlefj { Cis �� u s;°� ref 45 c R t^ i ,₹
y .Td'T7$� i`ratty: V.. • T{§°' 'T ' °�' r aT
•
x a :f .7 c 2��Jx • r.; r fYl a .,. m F, e4-••T - ` {' F sa ge ..z� a x,� '.::,.. . a- 's�' . 1,.. s,, }`*, r 'r,..
+e' YS'"" p ry Ct t t, Ut.. :ns;P ' t_y��,.• k).--:'•
et' R • ;..
d. * pip .x Jai a: yq • ' ,i \ .•tb`'.- , P � �:t x, x ' .
i. -:'• th e !n . . .tt .fat '4 •- �,,,. �...1/4"4".<;1",k.., dry t '
isft
�y yl "fit,, �t s,1 i z+.}l;"; � '� ` ' tai A'.1. �$ott.""'
'a• x g, .fr} `� e` ... y "'�*, • yM-,:,ry«b"' 4x ,�'� »�..ati' _..wyr.. - ..—. ._ + ~ .. "+' `ai
09/17/2007 13: 43 3038570351 CITY OF FT LUPTON PAGE 02/02
August 21, 2007
To: The Board of County Commissioners
Weld County, Colorado
Re: Case# USR 1608
Docket#2007-65
Greetings:
Please be advised that I am not protesting the above-mentioned proposed project but am
expressing concerns for my personal property, the area as a whole and consideration for several
requests.
Traffic will be greatly impacted on US Highway 85,which has already become far too congested
and also Colorado Highway 52. 52 is the main east/west corridor through Fort Lupton and being
only a 2-lane highway exhibits high traffic numbers. Increased truck traffic will only add to the
already risky driving conditions. Requiring acceleration and deceleration lanes be created will be
of some help to relieve the highly congested area.
We have all heard the phrase "development and progress is good but not in my backyard". Well
unfortunately, this project will be"in my backyard". I live at 725 S Grand Avenue that is
approximately one-half mile south of Highway 52, across US Highway 85 and directly east of the
proposed first phase of the project. Homeowners in this area paid premium prices for lots with a
mountain view. These views will be obscured., for a time,by"the sand hills"that will he created.
Although the ground west of the highway sets lower, it is not so low to prevent me from seeing
the top of tractors as they travel down the farm access road.. Therefore, l request these sand hills
not be allowed to be higher than 20 feet. Other requests include hours of operation be limited to
sunup to sunset on week days and not a 7 day operation; and that an earthen barrier be
constructed on the east side of Highway 85 for sound, dust and unsightliness. Further plans of
the City of Fort Lupton include a walking trail near the west edge of the greenbelt area directly
east of Highway 85. This bather would also serve as a safety feature for users of the trails.
I encourage the Commissioners to give serious thought and consideration to not only my
concerns and request but for the good of die impacted citizens.
Thank you.
Sincerely,
7thB /T
Barbara Rodgers
ll
725 S Grand Avenue
Fort Lupton, CO 80621
MjElFril
USR-1608 HOLTON LAKES CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
•
The Applicant, Ready Mixed Concrete Company, requests an amendment of Condition
1.K. (page 6) of the Resolution for Docket# 2007-65 as follows:
Section 22-5-100.A of the Weld County Code states, "oil and gas
exploration and production should occur in a manner which minimizes
the impact to agricultural uses and the environment and reduces the
conflicts between mineral development and current and future surface
uses." Section 22-5-100.B of the Weld County Code states"...encourage
cooperation, coordination and communication between the surface owner
and the mineral owner/operators of either the surface or the mineral
estate." Section 22-5-100.B.1 of the Weld County Code also states,
"New development should be planned to take into account current and
• future oil and gas drilling activity to the extent oil and gas development
can reasonably be anticipated." The applicant shall either submit enter a
Surface Use Agreement with Kerr-McGee Oil& Onshore LP ("KMG")
pursuant to that certain Dispute Resolution Agreement dated August 9,
2007 between the applicant and KMG a eopy of an agreement with the
property's mineral operators stipulating that the oil and gas activities have
been adequately incorporated into the design of the site or show evidenee
that an adequate attempt has been made to mitigate the eoneerns of the
mineral owner/operators." Drill envelopes can be delineated on the plat
in accordance with the State requirements as an attempt to mitigate
concerns. The plat shall be amended to include any possible future
drilling sites. (Department of Planning Services)
EXHIBIT
•
L - •
Hello