The URL can be used to link to this page

Browse Search

Home My WebLink About20073886.tiff Brad Mueller From: Brad Mueller Sent: Monday, April 23, 2007 1:24 PM To: Tom Honn Cc: Brad Mueller Subject: RE: Gold Stone Creek Covenants Tom -- t Nice to see you again today. Here's a rundown of outstanding items : * IA -- The surety agreement was approved by the Board on April 11, so that ' s taken care of. ✓ * CC&Rs -- The signed copy you provided includes a Section 2 . 06 on page 4 for a Private Exclusive Easement. Is that the one that was eliminated? If so, these pages probably need to be changed. Either way, we can't record these with a blank, so the alternative would be to know the date and reception number of the Grant of Easement. * Plat -- The County Attorney' s office has indicated that the BCC approval certificate is fine, so no changes are required on Sheet 1. I received the Sheet 2 and 3 copies from the surveyor. I forget what we decided -- were you going to provide new copies of the mylar it for these two sheets, for the note that was added? The notes on the draft were put in a strange location -- rather than adding to General Note 6, they were added elsewhere on the sheet, which makes them a bit hard to find. I 'd suggest combining the notes with General Note 6, then getting us the mylars, if that was the intent. (Though if it ' s preferred, the notes can stay where they are. ) * Fees are as follows: -- plat -- $31 CC&Rs -- $96 -- Water Agreement -- $36 -- Deeds -- $18 I think that ' s it. Thanks for forwarding all of the other remaining items -- DOW letter, etc. If there are any questions, please let me know; otherwise, I ' ll look forward to getting these last items and getting this wrapped up. Brad Mueller Weld County Planning Services Original Message From: Tom Honn [mailto:honn@thinair.net) Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2007 3 :29 PM To: Brad Mueller Subject : Fw: Gold Stone Creek Covenants Brad: Here is the DOW comment. Have you seen the revised plat language from Interemill. If so I will get the revised mylars. Is there a Commissioner date for the agreement? See you tonight. Tom Original Message From: "Rogstad, Larry" <Larry.Rogstad@state.co.us> To: "Tom Honn" <honn@thinair.net> Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2007 1:18 PM Subject : RE: Gold Stone Creek Covenants Thanks Tom for Apilding the covenants for review, and also for updating 6frin/Wile4tteta n.O 1 x2007-3 /6-' -&97O ,oz/17O • me on steps you have taken to conform with requests from Weld County Planning Department based on input from the Colorado Division of Wildilfe on the Gold Stone Creek development . Based on our conversation and the covenants reviewed, the Division of Wildlife is satisfied that you have complied with our suggestions, consequently we have no objection with you moving forward with your project. Hopefully this email will satisfy the planning staff that we are in accord on this project. If they require you to get a signed document from us let me know and I will prepare and forward a letter. This email was prepared and submitted by Larry Rogstad, District Wildlife Manager Colorado Division of Wildlife 2017 68th Avenue Greeley, Colorado 80634 Phone: 970-302-7394 Original Message From: Tom Honn [mailto:honn@thinair.net] Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2007 8 :55 AM To: Rogstad, Larry Subject: Gold Stone Creek Covenants Larry: The atorney' s office had trouble emailing last week. Here are the covenants that have information about wildlife and pasture issues. I look forward to receiving your letter regarding our working to address DOW concerns. Thanks. Tom Honn 2 Page 1 of 1 Brad Mueller From: Intermill Land Surveying, Inc. [intermill@gwest.net] Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2007 10:53 AM To: Brad Mueller Subject: Gold Stone Creek MS Attachments: Final Plat pg3 4-11-07.pdf; Final Plat pg2 4-11-07.pdf Brad, Tom Honn requested that I send you pages 2 and 3 for your review. We added a note below the entry detail that describes what the uses for Outlot C and D shall be. Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns. Thanks- Toby Childers Intermill Land Surveying, Inc. NOTICE: USE OF THIS ELECTRONIC MEDIA BY ANYONE OTHER THAN INTERMILL LAND SURVEYING, INC. SHALL BE AT THE SOLE RISK OF SUCH USER AND WITHOUT LIABILITY OR LEGAL EXPOSURE TO INTERMILL LAND SURVEYING, INC. BY SAVING THESE FILE(S),USER ACCEPTS RESPONSIBILITY FOR THIS ELECTRONIC MEDIA. 04/18/2007 • - wm • & , L r El t PI ' ' li 00 - F, � . : — . �' S ' 8e. LI 0 c et a= 3 a Et of l [ 1`X-1 ° q r 1 !c 4—, as °,7?, __ __. 11 ,. ° 1_i 1 �/� 0 oq .8 —.-. d9 I VU p�Z� `o M5!zA -� e e O¢ R4 zoom F e LLL��/ a M1 iN 1'0 S �� _- - _ - -uw ' —._ — --_ 3! —i ,—\7.-----, — _— — WELD COUNTY ROAD 29 T /t > 1 o 19 Al j �B Mil zm '.2,1.! „• zm- LLI o al fi 8'B ;a ,+c- I: e a /_ 2 - Za s - 9 p 2- g a Z 0 � �€.1717r a $ ?any — . g P 4 01 A�� r Fx • • fli -.,3303. 33- 4 O a Om s 3 o, ox CD tj'S EltEtl 7 I ,,I4CA 'ia' g`4'. n �7 s ---„, ' 1 a 3 v ir i ,r c �. o ,-V m,z,ec 1 — — �0n 3 / o_ g t o w o 0 ., o 0 o c ;- I 0 0 ¢O .00 _o S . p m — L' ,:.i. s - �� eit S 0111 Z s .. CU . J mR VV .0 40 4 IOC 'Ft SHIP rP /e Ja iii @�7 `c 3 )\ h o Cp EK/ rTh 'I l c ?; =o " 578M ' �z ' �__- d a,1 II, N a ( Cr c>. co `o r\ t o v z g' p p L".J \ �j o f /cam ` '„ 5 8 2 — i 1 Y A617\ 0 L/� `�' 4' e 9 PIt' ,-\ IEF .r rA © / I it I1 3°30 � 32 97 t O2'3 % a- - 3 LL z 5 Z c 32' 71 3 , j K ail „ I ' Z I Ii . Pa / . , • • Page 1 of 2 Brad Mueller From: Cyndy Giauque Sent: Monday, April 23, 2007 11:49 AM To: Brad Mueller Subject: RE: BCC Certificate (MF-1081) Brad, It's okay to include the additional statement on the plat concerning the responsibility for the roads. Cyndy From: Brad Mueller Sent: Monday, April 23, 2007 9:51 AM To: Cyndy Giauque Subject: FW: BCC Certificate (MF-1081) Did you have an opinion on this? I'll call you this morning, since this is the last remaining issue for us to record the plat. Thanks -- Brad From: David Bauer Sent: Monday, April 09, 2007 12:10 PM To: Brad Mueller Subject: RE: BCC Certificate (MF-1081) Brad, I don't know what you want in the way of response from me but I would think that the more detailed description of the conditions of plat acceptance would be very acceptable. If those conditions are not noted there, then where are they noted? David Bauer Weld County Public Works From: Brad Mueller Sent: Monday, April 09, 2007 11:55 AM To: Cyndy Giauque Cc: David Bauer Subject: BCC Certificate (MF-1081) Cyndy, Appendix 26-P.4. reads: "This plat is accepted and approved by the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, State of Colorado." I have an applicant that has submitted a minor subdivision plat that reads: "This plat is approved by the board of County Commissioners of Weld County, State of Colorado. Approval of this plat does not constitute acceptance of the roads and rights-of-way for maintenance by Weld County. The construction, maintenance, snow removal and all other matters pertaining to or affecting the roads and rights-of-way are the sole reasonability of the land owners within the minor subdivision." 04/23/2007 • • Page 2 of 2 A question: • Would this alternate approval certificate be acceptable? (This info about the roads and maintenance is correct in this case.) The owner is in China for months on end, so getting a new mylar is very difficult. If this approval certificate is not acceptable, we will probably ask the engineering company to provide a letter and come in an alter the existing one. Thanks, Brad • 04/23/2007 • • Page 1 of 1 Brad Mueller From: Cyndy Giauque Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2007 3:04 PM To: Brad Mueller Subject: FW: Letter of Credit rules FYI From: Bruce Barker Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2007 2:58 PM To: Cyndy Giauque Subject: RE: Letter of Credit rules Ideally, it would be best to have it be submitted by the entity that is obligated to do the improvements, but in the end, I am not sure it matters. It the collateral expires, I think the company is still obligated to provide adequate collateral via the subdivision improvements agreement. From: Cyndy Giauque Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2007 1:53 PM To: Bruce Barker Subject: FW: Letter of Credit rules Bruce, Have you run into this before?? Thanks. Cyndy From: Brad Mueller Sent: Monday, March 26, 2007 10:51 AM To: Cyndy Giauque; Donna Bechler Subject: Letter of Credit rules Cyndy or Donna, Does a Letter of Credit for collateral in conjunction with a subdivision have to be in the name of the landowner (in this case, an LLC), or can it be in the name of someone else (in this case, the individual who is a member of the LLC and the developer)? Thanks for your thoughts. Brad 03/27/2007 • ` r X �, DATE , • ...G:'.c NO. 5586 , I r j O RECEIVED FROM I^ L' +.1•rt 1 1 ' ,•i� i ':c.k (./ ..' ' %c_fi A ,-; — - 2 tn CD p ADDRESS .r.:4 to- 'i ^! C .��" ,�('f L �'t i� 1._.(`./,C -, / - i `'h"� i.'7 a CO U) i14 r. 1�'t`.L.,/I I• i� �rrt_ s.<<r '+'h',4 E�., tti "PC. 1QQLLARSS :c .. . tJ o y 'Z7 i rit r 1 7 S ! .4:F l.. ' vmIt FOR 'IX-.ti.. • } ! 't. .• r .. k ,� t r •t ,.. o u'O3 o ; d O O ACCOUNT HOW PAID ClN 'IT ''h ` I I r,,._; LnS•! ar.,.;)urI- { ' !!!!!!ti a AMT NAIL) . , IJi) CHECK M1 .-1t'�Y. '�, ti 11 A ;!AI AF CE MONEY l I f. }7 •. �� .11 3 Weld County Planning Department f REELEY OFFICE MAR 2 8 2007 RECEIVED • • • Weld County Planning Department GREELEY OFFICE • DEC 1 2004 Highland Schools Wel0EggiNtiD 209 W. First Street Ault, Colorado 80610 (970)834-1345 Branch Office(970)834-1185 Educational Excellence Through December 10, 2004 Community Unification Gold Stone Center, LLC C/O Walter Huang 1714 Topaz Drive Suite 240 Loveland, CO 80537 RE: MK-1081 To Whom It May Concern, Weld RE-9 School District with district offices located in Ault Colorado has adopted a methodology to determine an in-lieu payment for residential dwelling units sufficient to provide adequate educational opportunities for children who will be living in new residential developments. The school district methodology has been developed in a manner so as to fairly apportion the cost of acquiring school sites made necessary by residential development. The in-lieu payment per dwelling unit is $759. Your total in-lieu of payment is $6,831 as you are creating nine new residential dwellings. Payment should be hand delivered or mailed to Weld RE-9 School District, P.O. Box 68, Ault, Colorado 80610. Please reference your case number, which is MK- 1081, on your payment to the district. A receipt will be mailed to the party requesting the exemption. Please direct any questions to Dennis Scheer, Superintendent of Schools, 210 West First Street, Ault CO 80610, or by calling (970) 834-1345. incerely, Dennis M. Scheer, Ed. D Superintendent of Schools Weld RE-9 School District • w NOTES RECEIPT DATE NO. RECEIVED FROM 614;0,-AL Lt` Jtoamtr wit-8.. _ -...ADDRESS Acid 6511'"4.-- C/Ctlt St.bsli"✓isda"' FOR 1.3(kAir 54-1"A. 4.1 i k ,rcxM,,i vuA- ACCOUNT HOW PAID &I'i•[4"; e-„jyc , va,-. 1h AMT.OF '- CASH 1 .G 70' ACACCOUNT ..T��-t/w✓tom a; 7 AMT.PAfD "(J,I, t, - �CHECK � � BALANCE MONEY 81 141-43Q "vI y DUE ORDER - V(:2005 ®8L810 ' -1414O-- 4 lam^ 2808 CHINA DRAGON 1,L,(ro,Vet 4i-1('- „, 1714 TOPAZ DR.,SUITE 240 y LOVELAND,CO 80537 " �� DATE 3-�Z3-�b0 7 82-461-1070 ZV4PAY �`" " TO THE' ORDER 0FI+'L W-4-O 141441 k 6- 4 1)i 5"j Cl'c---t- kA`L��Ui1tiYRpk. w /• Al U DOLLARS e «....:.., S TT Ave CENTENNIAL Lmewa.1"01 CO 005376832 Hank of the West (970)270.1547 H (A)4I-IL icL I FOR (.1 . .-.. --------- - •,. - • -... -_-_,,,,,.......---.=_-- ----,-..-..,-�_� ., _i STATE OF COLORADO ) COUNTY OF WELD ) S.S. PETITION OF INCLUSION COUNTY OF LARIMER ) NORTH WELD COUNTY WATER DISTRICT TO: THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF NORTH WELD COUNTY WATER DISTRICT I/we, being all of the owners of the below described real property, which property is capable of being served with the facilities of the aforesaid District, hereby petition the Board of Directors of said North Weld County Water District to include the attached described real property within the boundaries of said District. Assent to the inclusion of such property is hereby given by the below signers, which signers constitute all of the owners of said below described property. C—r, c 5fpLcC2,71-62,71 — 1 )-27-0 6 I Owner Lvcj- cu 'c4« Date Owner Date Owner Date Owner Date STATE OF CpGQ,l41)O ) COUNTY OF /4,Q/J M ) ss COUNTY OF ) Subscribe to and sworn that the foregoing petition has been reviewed and petitioner knows contents thereof are the same and accurate to petitioners knowledge. erSA S+,t ,,,r--,:„, LL C II-27-04 Owner L664. L.) 7,1,— 7 Date Owner Date Owner Date Owner Date The foregoing LPctition was acknowled ed before me this a7 day of* , 0190‘by 4/a/Ai W ttU tw r /leCnhr Witness by hand and official seal: lOTq�'it� . My Commission Expires: -n No Public i • • WATER SERVICE AGREEMENT (Gold Stone Creek Minor Subdivision - SINGLE SYSTEM) THIS AG$E,EMENT is made and entered into as of the 1St'- day of Alva" g095, by and between the North Weld County Water District, acting by and through the North Weld County Water District Enterprise (hereinafter "District") and Walter Huang, Gold Stone Center LLC, (hereinafter "Developer'), of Gold Stone Creek Minor Subdivision, (hereinafter"Development"). RECITALS WHEREAS, District is a statutory special district formed under the laws of the State of Colorado and is a quasi municipal corporation; and WHEREAS, the District Enterprise was created by the District, in order to comply with the provisions of Section 20, Article X of the Colorado Constitution and Article 45.1 of Title 37 of the Colorado Revised Statutes, as applicable; and WHEREAS, the District owns, maintains and operates a system for the storage of and distribution of potable water within Weld County and Larimer County, Colorado; and WHEREAS, the Developer desires to contract with the District for certain potable water supplies and services for the Development known as Gold Stone Creek Minor Subdivision located in the North % of the Northwest ' of Section 16, Township 8 North, Range 66 West of the 6th Principal Meridian, County of Weld, State of Colorado, known as Weld County Parcel # 055316200014; and WHEREAS, Developer intends to plat and/or develop more than three residential lots which will require dedication of raw water and/or payment of cash in lieu of raw water dedication in accordance with the terms of this Agreement; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the covenants and agreements hereinafter set forth, it is agreed by and between the District and Town as follows: ARTICLE 1 WATER SUPPLY/FACILITIES 1.1 The District shall furnish Development a customary supply of water for a total of nine (9) individual Single-Family residential water taps ("Taps"). The District shall furnish 70% of an acre foot (228,000 gallons) of water per equivalent tap per annual water year, if the allotment for Colorado-Big Thompson (CBT) project water, which is determined by the Northern Colorado Water Conservancy District is 50% or greater, North Weld County Water District will restrict the delivery as necessary when the CBT allotment is less than 50%. 1.2 The water to be furnished by the District shall be potable water, which complies with the Federal Safe Drinking Water Act and any other applicable drinking water regulations. No promise or guarantee of pressure is made by the District or is to be implied from anything contained herein. 1.3 The District shall use reasonable diligence to provide a constant and uninterrupted supply of water, except for interruptions due to: (1) Uncontrollable forces; (2) Operations or devices installed for water system protection; (3) Maintenance, repair, replacement, installation of equipment, or investigation and inspection of the water system, which interruption or reductions are temporary, and in the sole opinion of the District, if necessary. 1.4 The District shall install, own, repair and maintain a meter vault at each individual lot. 1.5 The District estimates the water supply to have a normal pressure range of 100 to 120 pounds per square inch (psi). The Districts maximum pressure that will be supplied to the Development may be as great as 150 psi. Therefore, the Developer or Lot Owner agrees to install preventative plumbing devices to restrict and/or release the pressure. Developer and/or Lot Owner releases District from any and all liability or claims that may be made against the District concerning damage from excessive water pressure supplied to the Development. ARTICLE 2 RESIDENTIAL TAPS 2.1 The District must approve, in writing, all engineering and construction plans and materials of all Water Lines within any Development or Water Lines leading to the Development. The Developer shall be responsible for payment of the total cost of the construction for Water Lines within the Development (or Water Lines that are necessary to serve the Development) that will serve the Taps. 'Water Lines", means all lines which carry water to the meter vault(s) within the Development. 2.2 From the meter to the structure or lot being served with water, water will be delivered through private service lines which are installed by the Developer or Lot Owner, and for which the District has no responsibility or liability. 2.3 The District must approve engineering and construction plans of all Water Lines before construction. Once the District has approved the final Water Line construction, the District will conditionally accept the Water Lines by issuance of a conditional acceptance letter (see Exhibit "A"). Two years after conditional acceptance of the Water Lines, subject to final approval by the District, Developer shall dedicate ownership of the Water Lines to the District. The Developer may use the District's existing Water Lines to serve the individual taps, if the District determines in its sole discretion, that the Water Line may be accessed and has available capacity and pressure to serve the Development. 2,4 For all Water Lines located within the Development's roadway or utility/waterline easements, future repair of paving or other improved surfaces subsequent to the initial installation of any Water Line shall be the responsibility of the Developer, Homeowners Association, or current owner of the Right-Of-Way. The District will repair and backfill the trench to the surface but will not rebuild any surface improvements, including but not limited to pavement, curb and gutter, sidewalk, or landscaping other than grasses. 2.5 No water service will be provided to any water Tap within the Development until all fees, expenses and charges as determined by the District have been paid and/or raw water dedicated. The fees, charges and expenses, and/or water dedication shall be as determined and defined by the District and based upon such fees, charges and expenses, and water dedication requirements then in effect. Developer understands that the amount due for such fees, charges and expenses, and/or water dedication are subject to change or modification at the sole discretion of District. 2.6 Pursuant to this Agreement, the fees, expenses and charges for a water Tap consist of: (1) Review & Inspection Fee as provided in Paragraph 2.8; (2) Infrastructure Enhancement Fee as determined in Paragraph 2.9; (3) Plant Investment Fee as provided in Paragraph 2.10; (4) Mileage Charge pursuant to Paragraph 2.11; and (5) Raw Water or Cash in Lieu Fee as provided in Paragraph 2.12; (6) Raw Water Storage Fee as provided in Paragraph 2.12.2; and (7) Meter Fee as provided pursuant to Paragraph 2.15. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary herein, payment of all fees, expenses and charges as established pursuant to this Agreement shall be a condition precedent to the District providing water service to any Tap within the Development. Except as provided in 7.1, if the total fees, expenses and charges are not paid, all prior fees, expenses and charges paid by the Developer for any improvements made by the Developer shall be considered as forfeited to the District as liquidated damages as accurate calculation and determination of damages would not be possible. 2.7 The Raw Water or Cash in Lieu Fee, Plant Investment Fee, and Mileage Charge must be completed and fulfilled jointly before the District provides any water service. Once these fees have been paid or completed, the Developer or Lot Owner will then have one (1) year to pay for and have the meter set. Upon installation of the meter, or, after one (1) year of payment of these referenced fees whichever occurs earliest, the District shall commence billing the Developer or Lot Owner a Minimum Monthly Charge in accordance with the policies the District then in effect. The Minimum Monthly Charge shall apply whether or not any water is taken through the Tap. 2.8 The District will be expending resources for review and inspection of the Development including but not limited to engineering review, Water Line inspection, surveying, bacteriological testing, and pressure testing of the Water Line constructed for the development. The Developer will be required to reimburse the District for such expenses and shall be known as the "Review and Inspection Fee". The Review and Inspection Fee shall be solely determined by the District, and for this Development said fee shall be the sum of$2,000.00. A portion of this payment determined to be $180.°° of said Fee shall be paid by the Developer and payment shall be made upon execution of this Agreement and the remainder $1,820.00 of said Fee be made prior to commencement of construction of Water Lines that will serve the Development, or the issuance of any residential building permit, whichever occurs earliest. The Review and Inspection Fee, as established in this Paragraph 2.8 is non-refundable. 2.9 The District may be constructing substantial Infrastructure, including but not limited to connection to connection to existing 10" waterline in WCR 29, installation of two — 10" and one—8" isolation valves. A portion of these enhancements will be attributable to the Development and an "Infrastructure Enhancement Fee"will be charged to the Developer. The Infrastructure Enhancement Fee shall be solely determined by the District, and for this Development said fee shall be the sum of $5,320.0°. A portion of this payment determined to be $270.°° of said Fee shall be paid by the Developer and payment shall be made upon execution of this Agreement and the remainder $5,050.00 of said Fee be made prior to commencement of construction of Water Lines that will serve the Development, or the issuance of any building permit, whichever occurs earliest. The Infrastructure Enhancement Fee, as established in this Paragraph 2.9 is non-refundable. 2.10 The Developer or Lot Owner will be responsible for making payment of the "Plant Investment Fee". Said payment shall be made prior to the issuance of any building permit or the setting of a water meter, whichever occurs earliest. All Plant Investment Fees paid shall be in accordance with the Plant Investment Fee as established by the District and in effect at the time of the payment. No portion of the Plant Investment Fee shall be returned or refunded once established pursuant to this Agreement and the Development is approved by Weld County, even if the number of lots and/or Taps in the Development is later decreased or unsold. However, if the number of lots and/or Taps increases beyond the number initially established in Paragraph 1.1, Developer will pay the Plant Investment Fee for each new Tap within the Development at the rate for Plant Investment Fees then in effect. 2.11 The Developer or Lot Owner will be responsible for making payment of the "Mileage Charge". Said payment shall be made prior to the issuance of any building permit or the setting of a water meter, whichever occurs earliest. All Mileage Charges paid shall be in accordance with the Mileage Charge as established by the District and in effect at the time of the payment. No portion of the Mileage Charge shall be returned or refunded once established pursuant to this Agreement and the Development is approved by Weld County, even if the number of lots and/or Taps in the Development is later decreased or unsold. However, if the number of lots and/or Taps increases beyond the number initially established in Paragraph 1.1, Developer will pay the Mileage Charge for each new Tap within the Development at the rate for Mileage Charge then in effect. 2.12 The "Raw Water or Cash In Lieu Fee" requirement for this Development shall be met by payment of"Cash in Lieu". The Developer or Lot Owner will be responsible for making payment of this fee. Said payment shall be made prior to the issuance of any building permit or the setting of a water meter, whichever occurs earliest. All Cash In Lieu Fees paid shall be in accordance with the Cash In Lieu Fee as established by the District and in effect at the time of payment. 2.12.1 At the sole discretion of District, the District may allow the Developer to dedicate Raw Water to fulfill the raw water requirement. The raw water requirement for a Residential Tap being a single family residence on one (1) lot shall be the dedication of at least one (1) Unit of Colorado Big Thompson (CBT) project water per Tap, or at least one (1) share of North Poudre Irrigation Company (NPIC) stock for every four (4) residential Taps. 2.12.2 In addition to the dedication of the Raw Water, the Developer shall be responsible for a Raw Water Storage Fee as determined by District. The Raw Water Storage Fee shall be applied once for each Unit of CBT or four times per share of NPIC that is dedicated to the District. The Raw Water Storage Fee payment shall be made in conjunction with the dedication of the Raw Water. 2.13 The Developer shall provide the District with security, as deemed acceptable by District, to secure the installation and warranty of Water Lines within the Development during the two-year conditional acceptance period. Said security shall cover 25% of all costs for construction of said Water Lines, which shall be released at the expiration of the two-year warranty period and upon full acceptance of the Water Lines by the District. The type of security to be accepted shall be at the sole discretion of the District which will normally be a letter of credit, certificate of deposit, or bond. 2.14 During the two-year conditional acceptance period, the Developer will be responsible for any repairs or maintenance of the Development Water Line improvements. All such repairs and/or maintenance shall be in accordance with the District policies and engineering requirements, and shall be reviewed and approved by the District prior to any repairs or maintenance being effected except in emergency situations. 2.15 Prior to a meter being set and water service being provided at or for any Tap, the Developer or parcel owner shall be required to complete the District's Tap application form, pay the Meter Fee, and pay any remaining fees, expenses and charges, if any, in accordance with the policies and procedures of the District at the time of any Tap application, or any other expenses or costs that may be incurred by the District in relation to the Development. • • ARTICLE 3 FIRE PROTECTION 3.1 Fire protection is a basic provision required for development activities in the Weld County for which this Development is to be constructed. The Development may be located within an established fire protection district ("FPD") which has its own policies, procedures and requirements concerning fire protection which may be in addition to or supplement any requirements imposed by the Weld County. Developer understands that District is not responsible for compliance with any such FPD or Weld County requirements and such requirements are the sole responsibility of Developer, FPD and/or Weld County. Developer further understands that District is not required to provide fire flows or even allow fire protection devices, including but not limited to hydrants, Water Lines, sprinklers, and valves, to be installed, inspected, serviced or provided by District. 3.2 However, as a courtesy and public service, District will permit Developer to install certain fire protection infrastructure pursuant to the provision of this Article 3 and any other provisions or requirements deemed necessary by District, in its sole discretion. 3.3 Developer shall provide to the District, FPD and Weld County plans and specifications for fire protection infrastructure, including but not limited to location and size of Water Lines to serve fire hydrants ("Fire Facilities"). Said plans shall be in accordance with any specifications and requirements established by District, Weld County and/or FPD. 3.4 Upon final approval of the plans and design by District, Weld County and FPD, Developer shall be responsible for installation of the same including all costs incurred by District to review plans, installation, and inspection of the same by District. Upon approval of the installation of all such fire facilities by District, Weld County and FPD, District will thereafter assume the responsibility of effecting maintenance and repairs of such facilities but District will be compensated for such maintenance and repairs, in perpetuity, by Developer or Homeowners Association in the Gold Stone Creek Minor Subdivision. Additionally, responsibility for all costs of maintenance and repairs shall become a part of covenants that run with the title to all lots and property within the Gold Stone Creek Minor Subdivision, and which shall constitute a first and prior lien upon all lots and property in said Gold Stone Creek Minor Subdivision. 3.5 As additional consideration for this Agreement, Developer understands that District has not and will not perform any independent review or analysis of the adequacy of any fire facilities. Accordingly, Developer releases District from any and all liability or claims of any type that could be made against the District, including but not limited to water pressure, line size, lack of water, maintenance, volume or velocity of flow, or any other item related to fire facilities in the Development. 3.6 All final approval of this Development must make reference to the responsibility of the property and owners concerning expenses of maintenance and repairs for the fire facilities pursuant to Paragraph 4.4 ARTICLE 4 PETITION OF INCLUSION 4.1 If determined to be necessary by District, the Developer agrees to sign and execute a standard Petition of Inclusion, Exhibit "B". • ARTICLE 5 EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS-OF-WAY 5.1 As additional consideration for this Water Service Agreement, Developer agrees to sign and execute any necessary Easements and Rights-of-Way regarding specific locations, widths, size of pipeline(s) or pumping facilities and descriptions for Water Lines or pumping facilities as determined by the District. This Agreement is conditional upon execution and recording of the Easement and Right-of-Way Agreement, and until such Easement and Right-of-Way Agreement is finalized to the satisfaction of the District and recorded, District shall not be required to provide any services of any type. 5.2 Additionally, Developer shall convey Outlot A to North Weld County Water District in fee simple marketable title by a General Warranty Deed. Such conveyance shall be free and clear of all liens and encumbrances and shall be finalized not later than 30 days after the date of this Agreement. Said Outlot A shall be utilized by North Weld County Water District for a pumping facility. If the District does not utilize Outlot A within 10 years from the date of this Agreement, the District shall convey said Outlot A to the then current owner of Lot 9 of Gold Stone Creek Minor Subdivision. This Agreement is specifically conditional and shall not be final until proper execution and recording of the General Warranty Deed described hereinabove concerning Outlot A with Developer understanding that in the event Outlot A is not so conveyed, this Agreement is null and void and the District shall not be required to provide any services of any type for the Development. 5.3 Any final development plat must be reviewed and approved by District as to all aspects of Easements and Rights-of-Way for water appurtenances, pumping facilities, pipelines and fire facilities. All such items must be dedicated for public use and District must approve the final plat. ARTICLE 6 MISCELLANEOUS 6.1 This Agreement is conditional as the final plat of the Development has not yet been approved by Weld County. If the final plat is not approved on or before the 1st day of October, 2006, this Agreement can then be terminated by Developer and the same shall be considered null and void. Notwithstanding any language to the contrary, Developer shall be entitled to a refund of 98% of costs and expenses paid pursuant to Article 2.10, 2.11 and 2.12 if such refund is applied for within one year of the payment made to the District. The 2% retention by the District shall be considered as administrative expenses. All or any portion of costs or expenses the Developer incurred pursuant to Articles 2.1, 2.8, 2.9 and 2.15 shall not be entitled to a refund of any amount. 6.2 This Agreement cannot be assigned by Developer without the express written approval of District. 6.3 This Agreement shall inure to and be binding upon the parties hereto and their heirs, executors, personal representatives, successors and assigns. I IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement the day and year first above written. DEVELOPER: 66-'4 4e c By: c-Ctr. w 14, By: DISTRICT: ATTEST: NORTH WELD COUNTY WATER DISTRICT By: By: ad 4ri Secr ry President STATE OF COLORADO ) ) ss. COUNTY OFAel/e/liccA ) lei/emberThe foregoing instrument was/ac/.k/nowledged before a this a7 day of °v,3�, by �u/4 b/. /. t�j R�fr7Ac m6lr oper. R2& ✓ ✓ Witness my hand and official seal. My commission expires: /that O* A/ii!09 Notary P blic h.Q ` fl I\ 41. \O r® STATE OF COLORADO ) ) as. COUNTY OF WELD The foregoing instru2.0"0 me^n was acknowledged before me this /3z12 day of Altai 2OCXO , ZW Sr by CAAe-r\es Linz bar as President and j as Secretary of North Weld County Water District. Witness my hand and official seal. My commission expires: \O o08" ps�PNN D ilK0 1/4 '2 NOTARk . %u'.A •. PUBLIC . OZ� Notary Public �Po\,. i�� opfc oto\\\ass Brad Mueller From: Pam Smith Sent: Monday, November 27, 2006 10:29 AM To: Tom Honn Cc: Brad Mueller Subject: RE: Gold Stone covenants Hi Tom, Thanks for forwarding the covenants to me. I have reviewed them and they are fine. By this email I am notifying Brad of the same. Hope you had a great Thanksgiving! Pam Pam Smith ISDS Program Coordinator Weld County Health Department 1555 N 17th Ave Greeley, CO 80631 ph 970-304-6415 x2211 fax 970-304-6411 psmith@co.weld.co.us Original Message From: Tom Honn [mailto:honn@thinair.net] Sent: Wednesday, November 22, 2006 9:33 AM To: Pam Smith Subject: Gold Stone covenants Pam: I thought Brad would have routed the covenants to you but I guess he didn't. I have attached them for you to see Sections 4.05 and 4 . 19 D to see if you are ok with how the attorney worded the septic issue. I believe it captures what you wanted. Let me no if you need any revision. Thanks. Tom 1 • . Page 1 of 2 Brad Mueller From: Brad Mueller Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2006 7:07 PM To: Tom Honn Cc: Brad Mueller Subject: Sorry to miss your call . . . g.GoonDAB(-C? C D74 or v.i,c erz ACRC:E.1"I (c,c0C. Tom pet t‘c.epeD .o✓'+ ' I'm sorry to have missed your call; I was in a hearing much the day and didn't get back until later. Here is a list of the items that remain outstanding with the Gold Stone application (MF-1081) before we can record the plat. I'll assume you have a copy of the Board's Resolution, so I'll just refer by number. 1.B.1 —The CC&R's still make reference to the"old" legal, rather that the subdivision name and blank for filling in the reception number. (CC&R Exhibit A) The original CC&R will be recorded concurrent with the plat, and we'll fill N�_ ` in the reception number at that time. C £cse' --) 4'/a-.k 4crs J' 1.B.2. It's not clear whether there is reference to the Colorado Common Interest Ownership Act provisions, or / needs to be. l5 1.B.5—There's no owner notification about nuisance wildlife issues. 9, 1.C—We'll need an original, signed copy for recording (along with fees). However, because of some of the missing info discussed above, at this point, we should get another draft copy that we can quickly double-check. Rif 1.D. —Signed deed (and fees) needed. .1 1.E. — Signed deed (and fees) needed. (You might need another for Outlot C —for the sign lot— see comments below.) ✓,, 1.F —State HOA info needed. i 1.1.2 & 3— It's not clear whether the final Grading Plan and CD's have been submitted and approved by Public Works. They may have been, but I just don't have information from them or you that they have. 1.1.4—The original, signed Improvement Agreement is needed, along with the surety info (letter of credit, bond, etc.) Then, we will have to schedule this before the Board and get their approval before the plat can be recorded. We need maybe two weeks after getting the original and surety to get it through the Board meeting. V 1.J —We need evidence that school fees are paid. 4, ‘,4Ia.27L1VC LE-r'TEi 1.L.2 —The subdivision monumentation sign info should be on the plat. (As an aside, the advertising sign info you gave Kim —technically an "on-site real estate promotion sign"—is not yet allowed by our Code, though recent Code changes will soon allow it. It can be up to 48 sq ft in size and will need a building permit.) 1.L.3—The submitted plat shows an easement for the sign, not the common ownership parcel required by this �` condition. Revise the plat to make Outlot C (and D?), and make sure its big enough so that the sign can meet setbacks of 10'. Also, since it too is an outlot, we'll need a deed for it as well as Outlot B. Comments about the submitted plat: First, under the notes, as from the Resolution (1.M) 11/21/2006 • • Page 2 of 2 • Note 7 should have the actual street name, not [new road name]. • Note 9 has a typo (also in the Resolution)—should say Section 23-4-60. • Note 27 can be taken out—it was only meant to reference the notes from the COZ, which were correctly put on the draft plat. Other notes, to comply with Section 24-3-50.0 (see condition 1.L.1): J • The Certificate of Ownership is incorrect. See Section 24, Appendix 24-F of the Code. • The Easement Dedication certificate in Appendix 24-F (2)should be added. • The Certificate of Approval by the BCC is incorrect (too much language). See Appendix 24-F. • As discussed, and outlot (or two?) is needed for the sign(s) at the entrance. Revise Sheet 2. / • Does the 30' driveway easement need to be created and recorded separately for some reason? If not, it will be dedicated by the plat and the added Easement Dedication. AFinally, the last document needed before the plat can be recorded is a signed recordable copy of the Water Agreement, plus recording fees. I hope this is the information that you were calling about. Please feel free to call me on Monday with questions; otherwise, we will keep watching for these outstanding items. Thank you, Brad Mueller Weld County Planning 11/21/2006 rage i ui z • • Tom Honn From: "Brad Mueller' <bmueller@co.weld.co.us> To: "Tom Honn" <honn@thinair.net> Cc: "Brad Mueller' <bmueller@co.weld.co.us> Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2006 8:07 PM Subject: Sorry to miss your call . . . Tom, I'm sorry to have missed your call; I was in a hearing much the day and didn't get back until later. Here is a list of the items that remain outstanding with the Gold Stone application (MF-1081) before we can record Jthe plat. I'll assume you have a copy of the Board's Resolution, so I'll just refer by number. 3' 1 '`. 1.6.1 —The CC&R's still make reference to the"old" legal, rather that the subdivision name and blank for filling in the reception number. (CC&R Exhibit A) The original CC&R will be recorded concurrent with the plat, and we'll fill ,.Lw 4' in the reception number at that time. 14 1.6.2. It's not clear whether there is reference to the Colorado Common Interest Ownership Act provisions, or I ,1 ".- needs to be. J ! ;� 1.B.5—There's no owner notification about nuisance wildlife issues. yi Li II 1 —We'll need an original, signed copy for recording (along with fees). However, because of some of the missing info discussed above, at this point, we should get another draft copy that we can quickly double-check. ''C AD. —Signed deed (and fees) needed. 1.E. —Signed d edJaodfee eeded. (You might need another for Outlot C—for the sign lot—see comments 1/4ybelow.) V 1.F—State HOA info needed. 1.1)2 & 3— It's not clear whether the final Grading Plan and CD's have been submitted and approved by Public Wbrks. They may have been, but I just don't have information from them or you that they have. 4.1.4—The original, signed Improvement Agreement is needed, along with the surety info(letter of credit, bond, ✓ etc.) Then, we will have to schedule this before the Board and get their approval before the plat can be recorded. We need maybe two weeks after getting the original and surety to get it through the Board meeting. L./1.J—We need evidence that school fees are paid. 1.L.2 —The subdivision monumentation sign info should be on the plat. (As an aside, the advertising sign info you gave Kim—technically an "on-site real estate promotion sign"—is not yet allowed by our Code, though recent Code changes will soon allow it. It can be up to 48 sq ft in size and will need a building permit.) 3—The submitted plat shows an easement for the sign, not the common ownership parcel required by this condition. Revise the plat to make Outlot C (and D?), and make sure its big enough so that the sign can meet setbacks of 10'. Also, since it too is an outlot, we'll need a deed for it as well as Outlot B. Comments about the submitted plat: First, under the notes, as from the Resolution (1.M) • Note 7 should have the actual street name, not[new road name]. • Note 9 has a typo (also in the Resolution)—should say Section 23-4-60. 3/26/2007 Page 2 of 2 • • • Note 27 can be taken out—it was only meant to reference the notes from the COZ, which were correctly put on the draft plat. Other notes, to comply with Section 24-3-50.0 (see condition 1.L.1): • The Certificate of Ownership is incorrect. See Section 24, Appendix 24-F of the Code. • The Easement Dedication certificate in Appendix 24-F (2) should be added. • The Certificate of Approval by the BCC is incorrect(too much language). See Appendix 24-F. • As discussed, and outlot(or two?) is needed for the sign(s)at the entrance. Revise Sheet 2. • Does the 30' driveway easement need to be created and recorded separately for some reason? If not, it will be dedicated by the plat and the added Easement Dedication. o size Finally, the last document needed before the plat can be recorded is a signed recordable copy of the Water Agreement, plus recording fees. I hope this is the information that you were calling about. Please feel free to call me on Monday with questions; otherwise, we will keep watching for these outstanding items. Thank you, Brad Mueller Weld County Planning 3/26/2007 • • Page 1 of 1 Brad Mueller From: Brad Mueller Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2006 7:22 PM To: Tom Honn Cc: Brad Mueller Subject: Clarification . . . Is there any reason that the draft resubmitted CC&R's don't use the septic language that you and Pam talked about on October 17? Different language than what the two of you discussed was used; you'll need to make sure it's OK with Pam, or use what you discussed. Brad 11/21/2006 • • Page 1 of 5 Brad Mueller From: Peter Schei Sent: Monday, November 13, 2006 11:46 AM To: Brad Mueller Subject: RE: MF-1081 RE: Shear Project No: 2136-01-04; Gold Stone Creek Minor Subdivision; Weld County (Pierce) 13-Nov-2006. Good Morning, Brad: Yes, PW reviewed the Private IA(see attached) ... should be fine. PC/ BOCC did not want to maintain paved interior roadway, so gravel w/ private maintenance... Memorandum to follow. Have a great day, Peter. Peter SCHEI,P.E.,N.S.P.E. Weld County-Public Works Department 1111 -H Street, Greeley,CO 80632 970.356.4000 x3750 pschei@co.tueld.co.us .NicO .C Fjoh)c ;Veld County' From: Brad Mueller Sent: Monday, November 13, 2006 11:22 AM To: Peter Schei Subject: RE: MF-1081 RE: Shear Project No: 2136-01-04; Gold Stone Creek Minor Subdivision; Weld County (Pierce) Peter, Have you seen and/or approved the IA for this yet? Brad From: Peter Schei Sent: Monday, November 13, 2006 10:58 AM To: Brent Balik Cc: Brad Mueller; Tom Honn Subject: RE: MF-1081 RE: Shear Project No: 2136-01-04; Gold Stone Creek Minor Subdivision; Weld County (Pierce) Importance: High 13-Nov-2006. Good Morning, Brent: 11/13/2006 • • Page 1 of 5 Brad Mueller From: Peter Schei Sent: Monday, November 13, 2006 10:58 AM To: Brent Balik Cc: Brad Mueller; Tom Honn Subject: RE: MF-1081 RE: Shear Project No: 2136-01-04; Gold Stone Creek Minor Subdivision; Weld County (Pierce) Importance: High 13-Nov-2006. Good Morning, Brent: Thank you for submitting the revised cover sheet &cost estimate. As I understand, the Interior Road will be gravel. The revised cover sheet& cost estimate are both satisfactory and acceptable to Public Works. Please be certain you contractor understands the construction requirements for the gravel interior roadway. BUT, please don't wait for placing a copy of the Recorded Plat in the Construction Plans/ Drawings ... an unrecorded copy is satisfactory to be included with the plans. My apology for any mix-up. Public Works would just like to see an unrecorded copy of the Plat included with the Construction Plans. This is helpful to see the 'whole picture'. If someone really needs a copy of the RECORDED Plat later, they can do so. I will look for submittal of the Construction Plans. Be sure to coordinate a hearing and recording of the Improvements Agreement with Brad Mueller in Planning. Thank you for your good work. Have a great day, Peter. Peter SCHEI,P.E.,N.S.P.E. Weld County-Public Works Department 1111-1-1 Street,Greeley, CO 80632 970.356.4000 x3750 psch,ei@co.weld.co.us Homc 1llC c, Cot.;ply From: Brent Balik [mailto:bbalik@shearengineering.com] Sent: Monday, November 06, 2006 4:55 PM To: Peter Schei Cc: honn@thinair.net Subject: RE: MF-1081 RE: Shear Project No: 2136-01-04; Gold Stone Creek Minor Subdivision; Weld County (Pierce) RE: MF-1081 RE:_Shear Project No: 2136-01-04; Gold Stone Creek Minor Subdivision; Weld County (Pierce) Peter, 11/13/2006 Page 2 of 5 Attached is the revised Cover Sheet and Opinion of Costs spreadsheet for your review. The revised pavement section per our conversation at the BCC Hearing has been incorporated into the Cover Sheet. The section provided is recommended by our Geotechnical Engineer . The spreadsheet has been updated to reflect the Pavement Section revision and some minor Water Line revisions. This spreadsheet will be attached to the improvements agreement. Please review and comment. If everything looks OK would you please e-mail our County Planner that status and copy Tom and I? Also, it's my understanding that we will wait for the Plat to be recorded and include that in our 3 sets submitted to you for the Weld County inspectors? If you have any questions or comments or concerns please give me a call or e-mail me. Thank you! Brent Brent Balik Shear Engineering Corporation (970) 226-5334 Shear Engineering Corp. has provided, in the enclosed email, computer data for your use. The information contained in this email is not to be used or relied upon as a final source of design or as completed design results. The information contained herein may be used strictly by the party designated in this message. The receiver agrees that this data may not be transferred to any other party. This information may not represent information shown on recorded, approved or construction documents. The receiver is responsible for verifying the enclosed information with such recorded or approved documents. By opening this email or any attached files, the recipient accepts that the use of this email and the information contained within is used at his/her own risk and that Shear Engineering Corp. assumes no responsibility for damages of any kind resulting from the use of said email or information. From: Brent Balik Sent: Monday, November 06, 2006 07:59 To: 'Peter Schei' Subject: RE: MF-1081 RE: Shear Project No: 2136-01-04; Gold Stone Creek Minor Subdivision; Weld County (Pierce) Hello, Peter: Thank for the information, we appreciate it. We've secured Water District signatures and are prepared to submit the 3 sets of construction plans requested. May we have a set of stamped plans for release to the contractors for the site work construction? All Plans released for construction would then be signed and sealed buy us, have the Water District signatures and be approved by the Weld County Public Works Department. Also, the owner is out of town and is unable to sign the Final Plat to record. Would you prefer the Construction Plans we submit to Public Works include the recorded Plat? Thanks again Peter. 11/13/2006 • • Page 3 of 5 Brent Brent Balik Shear Engineering Corporation (970) 226-5334 From: Peter Schei [mailto:pschei@co.weld.co.us] Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2006 08:44 To: Brent Balik Subject: MF-1081 RE: Shear Project No: 2136-01-04; Gold Stone Creek Minor Subdivision; Weld County (Pierce) Good Morning, Brent: Please route (as needed)to applicable agencies (water district, etc.)first ... Weld County traditionally has not signed Construction Drawings. The Public Works Department will accept the Construction Drawings (full-size paper sets) and then place 'our in- house stamp' on the plan sets for our inspectors to utilize during construction ... this procedure insures inspection from an approved set. Additionally, any changes noted in a contractor's set of plans that are not in the inspector's set are not recognized or acknowledged ... insuring uniformity. We appreciate all your hard work and efforts. We will look forward to receiving the completed plan sets. Have a great day, Peter. Peter SCHEI,P.E.,N.S.P.E. Weld County-Public Works Department 1111 -H Street, Greeley,CO 80632 970.356.4000 x3750 pschei@co.weld.co.us o e Homc o Vvc ici C utinty" From: Brent Balik [mailto:bbalik@shearengineering.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2006 8:02 AM To: Peter Schei Subject: RE: Shear Project No: 2136-01-04; Gold Stone Creek Minor Subdivision; Weld County (Pierce) Shear Project No: 2136-01-04 Gold Stone Creek Minor Subdivision; Weld County (Pierce) Peter, Our Planner Tom Honn has requested we finalize the Civil Site Work Construction Plans. We are in the process of addressing the conditions required by the Department of Public Works outlined in the Minor Subdivision Plan Resolution (MF#1081) as they relate to the Plan Set. Upon completion, we would like to Plot mylars for Signature (Weld County Engineering and the Water 11/13/2006 • • Page 4 of 5 District). Once we secure the signatures we would then like to provide the requested 3 copies of the plan set signed and sealed by us. Would you like us to Route to Weld County Public Works or the Water District First? How should we proceed? Thank you, Brent Brent Balik Shear Engineering Corporation (970) 226-5334 From: Peter Schei [mailto:pschei@co.weld.co.us] Sent: Monday, January 30, 2006 11:00 To: bbalik@shearengineering.com; Chris Gathman Subject: RE: Shear Project No: 2136-01-04; Gold Stone Creek Minor Subdivision; Weld County (Pierce) Good Morning, Brent: Please submit ONE copy of requested documents to Public Works, initially. Because we may have comments/ revision requests that require modifying submittal drawings. Once Public Works has"approved"the documents/ plans/ drawings, THEN submit an additional THREE sets of plans for our Field Inspectors (sealed) at Final Plan. Thank you. This will save some paper, time and money. Have a great day, Peter. Peter SCHEI,P.E.,N.S.P.E. Weld County-Public Works Department 1111 -H Street, Greeley,CO 80632 970.356.4000 x3750 pschei@co.weld.co.us 'eo Hcrr tov\cL4 County„ From: Brent Balik [mailto:bbalik@shearengineering.com] Sent: Monday, January 30, 2006 10:54 AM To: Chris Gathman Cc: Peter Schei Subject: RE: Shear Project No: 2136-01-04; Gold Stone Creek Minor Subdivision; Weld County (Pierce) Shear Project No: 2136-01-04;_Gold Stone Creek Minor Subdivision; Weld County (Pierce) Mr. Gathman, 11/13/2006 • . Page 5 of 5 A submittal checklist I pulled from the County Website states that the Planning Department may request additional information for a Final Plat application. We are preparing our Final Plat/Plan submittal. Are we required to submit the same number of copies of Final Utility Plans and Final Drainage Report that were submitted with the change of zone application? We submitted three copies of each. Additionally, we are submit an opinion of costs with this Final Plat Submittal as requested by the consulting Planner. How many of these copies should we submit? Thank you for your assistance. Brent Balik Shear Engineering Corporation (970) 226-5334 11/13/2006 Brad Mueller From: Tom Honn [honn@thinair.net] Sent: Monday, October 30, 2006 2:56 PM To: Brad Mueller Subject: Gold Stone Covenants LL Thomas E. DECL OF Honn.vcf(636 B) ENANTS 10 30 06.d Brad: Sorry I missed you today. I needed to talk to Kim so I gave him the sign info I received after you and I talked last week. It is a lots for sale rather than an identific ion sign. I have included the revised covenents. Please review and the Attorney will finalize every thing. I spole to Kim about our conversation on my property and he has a crude sketch of what we talked about. He seemed to think there may be a date of a code change that might have been done after my RE and it could affect something and he was going to explore it. Thanks a bunch. tom 638m " 11 1 01/12/2001 It FA1 1710307{07■ DI Al w•o• — ' Gold Stone Cree (Tim'e5-Nesvitom► (Amagone BT 36 bold) Editable copy of the I.Oaa. O1., subdivision plat will be Custom o ao9 touts sites •sent in a separate email • 4+ acres each Keep( when I receive it. • "'fir& power "ady • Affordable 'hO `Yfazketed day (Amazone : 24 bold) b.);1 ; Gold Mountain Realty -4o Br • ill Cheng 970-231-0374 C kt/ t *O 14,./LCL (Times New omen o (,) ( +eV 3�y ` �` 0Dek � L 4 I \ II Lit) Q rtiikac c,),7 :0 390'd dIVc3t! INIVW N9IS Ti VEI99890L61 6S:ET 900L/LL(0I 4 • • Brad Mueller From: Peter Schei Sent: Monday, August 21, 2006 9:59 AM To: Brad Mueller Subject: RE: Gold Stone Creek Roadways Good Morning, Brad: I don't recall ever seeing this letter . . . It looks like they changed their minds about paving the interior roadway for the subdivision. I was not aware. The proposed development is a minor subdivision, 9-lots, in an area where with no off-site (County Roads) paving adjacent to the access, and not a CODE requirement . . . So therefore, I would find no conflict with their proposal of not paving the interior development road. All other things being considered, 'the reduction to a gravel standard' will be OK with respect to drainage . . . Conditions now place the site in a more conservative manner. Brad, you are correct to note the change. I am in agreement to proceed forward with the BOCC hearing. This change (no paving of the interior roadway) may be supported . . . BUT the applicant will need to modify the Improvements Agreement to Private (road maintenance) . . .prior to recording. Any modifications to the BOCC resolution should be easily made. Have a great day, Peter. P.S. Thanks for let us know this change ! (Typically, a change from gravel to paving . . . Would be more of a concern. ) Peter SCHEI, P.E. , N.S.P.E. Weld County - Public Works Department 1111 - H Street, Greeley, CO 80632 970.356.4000 x3750 pschei@co.weld.co.us "Welcome Home - to Weld County" Original Message From: Brad Mueller Sent: Monday, August 21, 2006 8 :24 AM To: Peter Schei Subject: FW: Gold Stone Creek Roadways Peter, Please see the attached, indicating a shift in direction with the roads for MF-1081 (Gold Stone) . Were you aware of this? How is this looking otherwise (drainage, etc. ) ? It' s tentatively scheduled with the BCC on Sept 20, although I haven't gotten the official word. Call if we should discuss. Brad Original Message From: Tom Honn [mailto:honn@thinair.net] Sent: Friday, August 18, 2006 2 :02 PM To: Brad Mueller 1 • • • Subject : Gold Stone Creek Roadways Brad : See attached letter. Do we have a date? I will drop off letter from Post office and School regarding street use and easements on Monday. Tom 2 • • August 14, 2006 Weld County Planning Staff 918 10th Street Greeley, CO 80631 RE: Gold Stone Creek MK-1081 We have reviewed the information regarding the above named project. Following are our comments related to the proposed plan: • The entryway detail is acceptable as shown. • The cash in lieu of land dedication fee of$6,831 shall be received by the school district prior to the county approving the plat. • Entryway will be stabilized with recycled asphalt or pavement. Bus service may be suspended or alternate pickup on the county road if the interior roadways are not maintained to a condition to support the bus turnaround. Assuming these conditions are met, this will satisfy the district requirements related to this referral. Sincerely, Lance Yoxsimer Transportation Director August 1, 2006 Brad Mueller, Assistant. Planning Director Weld County Department of Planning Services 918 10th Street Greeley CO 80631 Subject: Final Plat Street design—Gold Stone Creek Subdivision Dear Brad: As a result of the Planning Commission's concern for maintenance issues associated with our proposed paved street, and after considerable discussion,we will be adjusting the street, Gold Stone Creek Street,to a non-paved public street. Please make appropriate adjustments to the staff report for the County Commissioners meeting. Please let me know if you require any further information. Si erel , ,O I omas E. onn, I P Applicant's Representative To: Weld County Planning From: Postmaster—Pierce(Nunn Routes) Subject: Postal requirements for Gold Stone Creek Date: August 1, 2006 The Post Office will deliver mail to individual boxes placed aadjacent to driveways at the edge thg public street named Gold Stone Creek Street. Postmaster Date l � Pierce Post Offi "` Hello