The URL can be used to link to this page

Browse Search

Home My WebLink About840303.tiff RESOLUTION RE: APPROVAL OF USE BY SPECIAL REVIEW FOR AN OIL AND GAS SER- VICES CONSTRUCTION YARD - TIMOTHY AND DONNA SHARP WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, pursuant to Colorado statute and the Weld County Home Rule Charter, is vested with the authority of administering the affairs of Weld County, Colorado, and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners held a public hearing on the 1st day of February, 1984 , at the hour of 2 : 00 o' clock p.m. in the Chambers of the Board for the purpose of hearing the application of Timothy and Donna Sharp, 21588 Weld County Road 52 , Greeley, Colorado 80631 , for a Use by Special Review for an oil and gas services construction yard on the following described real estate, to-wit: Part of the NE4, Section 34 , Township 5 North, Range 65 West of the 6th P .M. , Weld County, Colorado WHEREAS, Section 24 . 4 . 2 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance provides standards for review of said Use by Special Review, and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners heard all of the testimony and statements of those present, has studied the re- quest of the applicant and the recommendations of the Weld County Planning Commission and all of the exhibits and evidence pre- sented in this matter, and having been fully informed, finds that this request shall be approved for the following reasons : 1 . The submitted materials are in compliance with the application requirements of Section 24 . 7 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. 2 . It is the opinion of the Board of County Commissioners that the applicant has shown compliance with Section 24 . 4 . 2 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance as follows: a. The uses which would be permitted will be com- patible with the existing surrounding land uses and with future development of the surrounding area as permitted by the existing zoning. b. The Weld County Comprehensive Plan discourages nonagricultural uses from taking place on prime agricultural lands . This Use by Special Review area, however, is located on Class VI poorly drained soils. Therefore, this proposal is con- sistent with the Weld County Comprehensive Plan. LHR 119 �'1-.Jyc 840303 Page 2 RE: USR - TIMOTHY AND DONNA SHARP c. The proposal is consistent with the intent of the "A" Agricultural Zone District in which it is located. d. No overlay districts affect the site. e. Use by Special Review Operation and Design Stan- dards provide adequate protection of the health, safety and welfare of the neighborhood and County. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Com- missioners of Weld County, Colorado that the application for a Use by Special Review for an oil and gas services construction yard on the hereinabove described parcel of land be, and hereby is, granted subject to the following conditions : 1 . The attached Standards for Use by Special Review shall be adopted and placed on the Use by Special Review plat prior to recording. 2 . No additional building or electrical permits shall be issued for the Use by Special Review Permit area until the Standards for the Use by Special Review have been placed on the Use by Special Review plat and the plat has been delivered to the Department of Planning Services Office. The above and foregoing Resolution was , on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the 1st day of February, A.D. , 1984 . °-11917t-tee. i) BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ATTEST: i�1 vt,-;e e. `4 �, ' i�;;,,;;{ ;y,1 WELD COUNTY, COLORADO 41 Weld County Clerk and Recorder EXCUSED and Clerk to the Boar-d-- Norman Carlson, Chairman BY: (,/c_ 1/„/L.42/L- 4/Lo/ \-k;,..___ 4\1\,0A5-County erk J cqu ine John on, Pro-Tem APPROVED AS TO FORM: 'S/ kJ Gene R. Brantner / p, County Attorney Ch c Carlso ) J T. Martin n n 020684 OPERATION STANDARDS Timothy Sharp U.S.R. - 602:83:65 1. The uses permitted shall be an Oil and Gas Services Construction Yard as described in the application materials on file with the Department of Planning Services. 2. The Use by Special Review Area shall be maintained in such a manner so as to prevent soil erosion fugitive dust and growth of noxious weeds. 3. The LaSalle Fire Protection District shall be notified by the applicant upon obtaining final inspection of the proposed building addition by the Weld County Building Inspection Department. The applicant shall provide the LaSalle Fire Protection District with information regarding the number, placement, and location of five (5) extinguishers on the property which shall have the approval of the LaSalle Fire Protection District. 4. Hazardous substances (including quantities of diesel fuel and gasoline and in excess of 120 gallons) per CRS 29-22-107(2) (a) shall be listed with the State Health Department, Division of Waste Management and with the Weld County Emergency Response Coordinator. Evidence of this listing shall be provided to the Department of Planning Services prior to final approval by the Board of County Commissioners. The Department of Planning Services staff will work with the applicant to comply with this standard. 5. The applicant shall comply with the design standards for the Use by Special Review, Section 24.5 et seq. , of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. 6. The applicant shall comply with the Operation Standards for Uses by Special Review, Section 24.6 et seq. , of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. 7. Representatives or members of the Weld County Health Department and Weld County Department of Planning Services shall be granted access onto the site at any reasonable time in order to insure the operations carried out on the site comply with the Development Standards stated hereon and all applicable Weld County Regulations. 8. The Use by Special Review area shall be limited to the plans shown hereon and governed by the Standards as stated above and all applicable Weld County Regulations. Any material deviations from the plans and/or Standards as shown or stated above shall require the approval of an amendment of the Permit by the Weld County Planning Commission and the Board of County Commissioners before such changes from the plans and/or Standards are permitted. Any other changes shall be filed in the office of the Department of Planning Services. 9. The property owner and/or operator of this operation shall be responsible for complying with all of the above stated Standards. Noncompliance with any of the above stated Standards may be reason for revocation of the Permit by the Board of County Commissioners. HEARING CERTIFICATION DOCKET NO. 84-1 RE: USR, OIL AND GAS SERVICES CONSTRUCTION YARD, TIMOTHY AND DONNA SHARP A public hearing was conducted on February 1 , 1984, at 2:00 P.M. , with the following present: Commissioner Norman Carlson, Chairman, Excused Commissioner Jacqueline Johnson, Pro-Tem Commissioner Gene Brantner Commissioner Chuck Carlson Commissioner John Martin Also present: Acting Clerk to the }ward, Mary Reiff Assistant County Attorney, Lee Morrison Planning Department Representative, Rod Allison The following business was transacted: I hereby certify that pursuant to a notice dated January 9, 1984, and duly published in the LaSalle Leader on January 12, 1984, a public hearing was conducted for the purpose of considering the request of Timothy and Donna Sharp for a Use by Special Review for an oil and gas services construction yard. This hearing was continued from January 25, 1984. Lee Morrison, Assistant County Attorney, read this request into the record. Chairman Pro-Ten Johnson reminded the applicants that only four Commissioners were present and they could request another continuance if they did not wish to proceed with the hearing today. The applicants indicated that they wished to be heard today. Rod Allison, representing the Planning Department. read the favorable recom- mendation of the Weld County Planning Commission into the record. He also stated that nine Operation Standards were reeuntnended with the Use by Special Review application. Mr. Sharp came forward to answer questions of the Board. He stated that they have already complied with Operation Standard #4, although they did not feel this was necessary. Commissioner Johnson questioned the access onto Weld County Road 52. The applicant stated that the current two accesses have been there for a number of years and that they do not expect that this Use by Special Review will significantly increase the volume of traffic in the area. The area under consideration has been used as a farm storage area previously. Londell Bunting, a neighbor, came forward and commented on the improvements the Sharps have made since acquiring this property. Commissioner Martin moved to approve_ this request for a Use by Special Review for an oil and gas services construction yard for Timothy and Donna Sharp, with the Operation Standards as recommended. Commissioner Brantner seconded the motion, which carried unanimously. APPROVED: • 1/47111 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS A1'rhST: 611":44:442/1"4.7.1 WELD COUNTY, COLORADO • Weld County Clerk and Recorder EXCUSED and Clerk to the Board- Norman Carlson, Chairman (/ Deputy County C4drk - cqu 'ne J on, Pro-Tem Ada le e-ilsbtAt Gene R. Brantner Chuck Carlson T�-c_-/-Y4f - -, �;Ali- 7v TAPE #84-8 qhn T. Martin DOCKET #84-1 IER 119 020684 ATTENDANCE RECORD DATE: February 1 , 1984 TODAY' S HEARINGS ARE AS FOLLOWS: COZ , A to C-4 , Vern Johnson DOCKET #83-90 USR, Oil & Gas Service Construction Yard, Timothy & Donna Sharp DOCKET #84-1 USR, Dog Kennel, Lewis & Barbara Cornell, DOCKET # 84-3 PLEASE write or print legibly your name, address and the DOCKET # (as listed above) or the applicant' s name of the hearing you are attending. NAME ADDRESS HEARING ATTENDING fF�\;� :gis4 G c It '-s a.. C,ceetej (. c /l J�}DN�VL,A��3 r�? 2)6-C &.) L��. c5,� C ro p i e t-� 0 7 - c�Q, . t rs-4 q W C i(/ 6-.x .es)l e/ 8'e1 BEFORE THE WELD COUNTY, COLORADO PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION OF RECOMMENDATION TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Moved by Doug Graff that the following resolution be introduced for passage by the Weld County Planning Commission. Be it Resolved by the Weld County Planning Commission that the application for: vrin pn! TV pnI!timem o CASE NUMBER: USR 602:83:65 nC-7-3rrl NAME: Timothy and Donna Sharp 1\7 l \+ JAN 51984 ADDRESS: 21588 Weld County Road 52, Greeley CO 80631 1` / (Y \ COLO. REQUEST: A Use by Special Review Permit for an Oil and Gas Services construction yard LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the NEZ, Section 34, T5N, R65W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado LOCATION: Two (2) miles southeast of Evans; south of Weld County Road 52 and east of Weld County Road 43 be recommended favorably to the Board of County Commissioners for the following reasons: 1. The submitted materials are in compliance with application requirements mf Section 24.7 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. 2. It is the opinion of the Planning Commission that the applicant has shown compliance with Section 24.3. 1 et seq. of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance as follows: - The uses which would be permitted will be compatible with the existing surrounding land uses and with future development of the surrounding area as permitted by the existing zoning; - The Weld County comprehensive Plan discourages nonagricultural uses from taking place on prime agricultural lands. This Use by Special -Review area however is located on Class VI poorly drained soils. Therefore this proposal is consistent with the Weld County Comprehensive Plan; - The proposal is consistent with the intent of the "A" Agricultural Zone District in which it is located; - No overlay districts affect the site; - Use by Special Review Operations and Design Standards provide adequate protection of the health, safety and welfare of the neighborhood and County. The Planning Commission recommendation for approval is conditional upon the following: 1. The attached Standards for Use by Special Review be adopted and placed on the Use by Special Review plat prior to recording. 2. No additional building or electrical permits shall be issued for the Use by Special Review Permit area until the Standards for the Use by Special Review have been placed on the Use by Special Review plat and the plat has been delivered to the Department of Planning Services office. Motion seconded by: Louis Rademacher USR 602:83:65 Timothy and Donna Sharp A Use by Special Review Permit for an Oil and tas Services construction yard Part of the NE1, Section 34, T5N, R65W of the 6th Y.M. , Wa1-d County, Colorado January 3, 1984 Page 2 Vote: For Passage Against Passage _Lydia Dunbar Doug Graff Sharon Linhart Bill McMurray Louis Rademacher Jack Holman Bob Ehrlich The Chairman declared the Resolution passed and ordered that a certified copy be forwarded with the file of this case to the Board of County Commissioners for further proceedings. CERTIFICATION OF COPY I, Bobbie Good, Recording -Secretary of the Weld County Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the -above and foregoing Resolution is a true copy of the Resolution of the Planning Commission of Weld County, Colorado, adopted on January 3, 11384 and recorded in Book No. IX of the proceedings of the said Planning Commission. Dated the 4th day of January, 1984. ZaLSvs Cl\e,n a, Secretary Date: January 3, 1984 CASE NUMBER: USR -602:83:65 NAME: Timothy and Donna SSarp ADDRESS: 21588 Weld County Road 52, Greeley CO 8-0631 REQUEST: A Use by Special Review Permit #or an Oil and gas Services construction yard LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the NE1, Section 34, T5N, R65W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado LOIC-ATION: Two (2) -miles southeast of Evans; south of Weld County Road 52 and east of Weld County Road 43 THE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT THIS _REQUEST BE APPROVED FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS: 1. The submitted materials are in compliance with application requirements of Section 24.7 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. 2. It is the opinion of the Department of _Planning Services staff that the applicant has shown compliance with Section 24.3.1 et seq. of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance as follows: - The uses which would he permitted will be compatible with the existing surrounding land uses and with future development of the surrounding area as permitted by the existing zoning. - The Weld County comprehensive Plan discourages non agricultural uses from taking place on prime agricultural lands. This Use by Special Review area however is located on Class VI _poorly drained soils. Therefore this proposal is consistent with the Weld County Comprehensive Plan. - The proposal is consistent with the intent of the "A" Agricultural Zone District in which it is located. - No overlay districts affect the site. - Use by Special Review Operations and Design Standards provide adequate protection of the health, safety and welfare of the neighborhood and County. The Department of Planning Services staff recommendation for approval is conditional upon the following: 1. The attached Standards for Use iy Special Reviewire adopted and placed on the Use by Special Review plat prior to recording. 2. No additional building or electrical permits shall be issued for the Use by Special _Review IPermit area until the Standards for the Use by Special Review have been placed on the Use by Special Review plat and the plat has been delivered to the Department of Planning Services office. OPERATION STANDARDS Timothy Sharp U.S.R. - 6,RD:83:65 1. The uses permitted shall be an Oil and Gas Services Construction Yard as described in the application materials on file with the Department of Planning Services. 2. The Use by Special Review Area shall be maintained in such a manner so as to prevent soil erosion fugitive dust and growth of noxious weeds. 3. The Use by Special Review area shall be limited to one (1) access point on Weld County Road 52; a fifteen (15) inches by sixty (69) feet CMP culvert shall serve the access point. 4. The LaSalle Fire Protection District shall be notified by the applicant upon obtaining final inspection of the proposed building addition by the Weld County Building Inspection Department. The applicant shall provide the LaSalle Fire Protection District with information regarding the number, placement, and location of fife extinguishers on the property which shall have the approval of the LaSalle Fire Protection District. 5. Hazardous substances (including quantities of diesel fuel and gasoline and in excess of 120 gallons) per CRS 29-22-107(2) (a) shall be listed with the State Health Department, Division of Waste Management and with the Weld County Emergency Response Coordinator. Evidence of this listing shall be provided to the Department of Planning Services prior to final approval by the Board of County Commissioners. 6. The applicant shall comply with the design standards for the Use by Special Review, Section 24.5 et seq. , of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. 7. The applicant shall comply with the Operation Standards for Uses by Special Review, Section 24.6 et seq. , of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. 8. Representatives or members of the Weld County Health Department and Weld County Department of Planning Services shall be granted access onto the site at any reasonable time in order to insure the operations carried out on the site comply with the Development Standards stated hereon and all applicable Weld County Regulations. 9. The Use by Special Review shall be limited to the plans shown hereon and governed by the Standards as stated above and all applicable Weld County Regulations. Any material deviations from the plans and/or Standards as shown or stated above shall require the approval of an amendment of the Permit by the Weld County Planning Commission and the Board of County Commissioners before such changes from the plans and/or Standards are permitted. Any other changes shall be filed in the office of the Department of Planning Services. 10. The property owner and/or operator of this operation shall be responsible for complying with all of the above stated Standards. Noncompliance with any of the above stated Standards may be reason for revocation of the Permit by the Board of County Commissioners. LAND USE APPLICATION SUMMARY SHEET January 3, 1984 CASE NUMBER: USR-602:83:65 NAME: Timothy and Donna Sharp ADDRESS: 21588 Weld County Road 52, Greeley, Colorado 80631 REQUEST: A Use by Special Review Permit for an Oilfield Construction Yard LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the NE14, Section 34, T5N, R65W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado LOCATION: Two (2) miles southeast of Evans; south of Weld County Road 52 and east of Weld County Road 43 SIZE OF PARCEL: 14.39 acres, more or less POSSIBLE ISSUES SUMMARIZED FROM APPLICATION MATERIALS: The criteria for Use by Special Review is listed in Section 24.3 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. The use proposed is allowed in the "A" (Agricultrual) Zone District as a Use by Special Review. The Department of Planning Services has not received any objections regarding this application. JRM:rjg FIELD CHECK FILING NUMBER: USR-602:83:65 DATE OF INSPECTION: December 14, 1983 NAME: Timothy and Donna Sharp REQUEST: Use by Snecial Review Permit for an Oilfield Construction Yard LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the NE4, Section 34, T5N, R65W of the 6th P.M. LAND USE: N Residence, crop production E Crop production and residence S General farming W Crop production _ ZONING: N Agricultural LOCATION: Two (2) miles southeast of Evans; E Agricultural south of Weld County Road 52 and east of S Agricultural Weld County Road 43 W Agricultural COMMENTS: Access to the subject site is from Weld County Road 52, a dirt road. Improvements consist of a corral for livestock, a warehouse, a shop, a residence, an office and garage, etc. (See plat map for location.) There are also numerous trees (conifers) on the property. The land is nearly level. a‘9,,,-- BY: .:2?If 4...4 tr { .714 es R. Mayer , ur nt Planner JRM:rjg ] z z ] ] 3 E !• 'V ! v to I� t y � v 1• p i'e i T p . i \ •• •, , att r • 771°,11• I:I .•.m.. . 1e.._ a '© e e .0 Il.o •. • ] 'o ` ° l •L� IIU=o Ra • • • e \9C ••• 0.:r„ r▪ y• 1\ 15/223 24 5 : 7▪ 1, )" "° / xo i• xr••I xx 0 z> \ a e x• •) xx \•�•C•[Q{ ��^1 n, 20 ` q S•: • !tll•1• • • 9-,. ••3 i'•..cxaELL°- • •ti• • • . �I \ h : •- a0 tc • -..t-, so o•n z, • �/ A'r0N rub</2 • J• • • • • e • • • •° p ▪ i .a�•7 Ii. rotx] x, w • x . ) tn., ,e .xns Ct_ pJ 1 • I r=te•- •• t . . L - - - - e • to •] 55 900„„ 'ti . --...51/ �,1 • • '• • • • °M • 1� O • I, t ▪'•• .u• �.pi \ 11® cram; xR �s -Z.,Ix]]II L.v t L pp{ (-� y1 y t: E° J ]• •kp ' : , . Sn:.b.. o o, � K• , 7. • y ... / ! • ,. B 1 —-- el._ I .._9. . coos ti ,. ' flSt"17.--....J •`\\\VVII\\ `mil • r ^II x2 �. r 95• •Lrr ��. top VtL�C��,-__RD�EN CITY r • ' • .• ,`I o• ,..F41: zn0: i] I in . I 1 to LL • z] z I ;-xx t • • • 25 • 1 .n ]• • \n xs 1i� I—ri"I r z it .n, •• •• » •rr Si• I J- a '°'I 3 n I ar I / R14.' »" � . .1 , • First rCorrettion ' �-✓ Line _� N011 - _ - _ _-, 1 9▪ i. '1-'1.-\. pNY I ••.• LA SA LE J y-• • I ;r<# • • z �� REAT 1 O.. 1q6 ▪•e)'UNION _ .'�' IFIL •I •I 1 . • • ` 's !u• •� ,MrunN• o.De ii•3�• ene /c•'L-/�w"l • MP POZ • 4, • - IDI� • - - -� •zirrorai+ I_ CP I� '_ - - r-: :::]- - -• a"y: ", r r• . . - _._ -j:-_-.." • '-.: ! _fit.;. - , ._ • • JJ J/ r �. • • O •• I • •I a''' ! • ••n ' n ' u ' a lb .. /,,!t • n I • • x • r• � r• •I. Gd • ow, •f _ /j•!rr 3'•�• e •° ..... • •I•Ri] • • _- a r .32 �// • • : : :• . nil` • ['e .• ! '• •� •II✓4CC, n • _ ® ▪ P• ••• rt •Ittl,• ° e' (1JO1 r•! • ' I O Cj u f14~4 u • I• •o s" i• • 'L' • n ••': • • 80 u i n tl• n• ' u ,` • •.• la 1/1 • •x, _ _._ , •! _• '. 01. . n, • • a• • u • E° n t• ! •n•••! n ' t• I SO to• ai I e▪N`.I� r" ..!GiLCRE5T•Iy�••L _ ]i• l<' _ f1 _•_ • !• _ H.• ,•t — y;I e E 223• m I ' r' • • ♦ I r _ �j I •• r , • ] • • • •.- I I 1 1 w I n I I u rr ] r n n �i n I • n I 7 I • R LATiEVILLE • ' I P I I 1 43 m � _-‘,__LiN 1.9 o °- - \ v I I b E a I( n I II o ( - 'dam O � m a d q m -4660' 3b!,I. 1� a e 0wER o A{tP F.. 41 a C 1 El w I I a I 0 N A650�` w 111 a A61° 4 I ✓' ovff` . i o 0 Z d __ — III 60 pltcr 1 w ' o eo 1 • i z o IL r1 e e l F i•�. i i Sy - el 2 - r N O COb z a C P A mV .. .M ... Cr v> ,rh`0 �� : .. b 9 a R W i t Td — v �i o �1 m a� I �a c-„. 6 6 P —u N 3-1M C In II: ...• .. 9 0 _ IV' m I IA 9 ., "•.. Il.•• j i. ... I�� 1 �.. A1 • �,• �_� Z au c _ l�Nl�II I Iv _ 1 _ 1 r m �♦� NO I 0 . • i L L,t, ri 's Pr;.;r�r Y s� �.,\?Ix.i:- s ,• _ tF ii ' ' ' 4" LI::i 11, ...";144. :'.:1:1A1.' ' 4 . 7;111 ' „'I . '7:-111 .71.;17:76 ''i '- .).;', ''l,i‘ . .„. ..., r 4 4� ,._: 4 .. tt. 1 c....1 as 4 7 °i s • C+ m" 1' 'i9"n G- -� y - r.a t +1 ?ramp„'. y' st mt At4. \` ri " k *. ryL 4';'''4,1"' f_� ?may ~ /�(��/\\' . , 44 A/ e t' i t t i i ..it.� } "`-°n• < '' 1 it ,'' . r:;— figs . ', rr >au *•.1M.$ ,:,.E.v, d.r a ti j r'z444 f a b— sue: r.P.i.,:"67.?,-;,sr :G& r4F. .kiy r .. 'y� , $, y r: _ 3 } n.. 44 S P4'}� t »e9 i,,6 V s( k '`K .F • a. as^iF 4 +a x '.r4. - segos'. � f 1 - _1!1—br"s t= .r-x - q, -r R nr 4 rsud" v h _> - V -7:7,3.. y A 2Fk yS $ i t, - S 'At.- x ,,,f _$ t e" Iw C .. ' 'i l \ e YY .4.,..!%1�sS , 3 Y.. "F ': .;1r.. 4.----,..?..-?-.' > 1 ,: d S 4y � S ," + 4! 4h, m 4,4 rk 4 S S9' '•^8 $ r. 44 9M1 ]Alp j {, 1:: Kf... —_-.iY # -' 'f•,.i i', s •A` of 1. y,��y- #, � x � t ` ".ti �x �*„`�P�i�'•� '�_ .. .�, i.. 1. S`y�i• ,ly :yam ♦.;:.1 s t,0.1.µ.+7x ';4 '� � x ..t R,..„.. ,.. ., .......„,„ , •f r.%'�''' _ i i f ..-.,,,a,,, efr te• " ,•::% s,$,',RYI_i 7�?.x� j. .s"Fae ' r .� o a '' } t szi4,'ti3 APPLICATION }r77- 1Th -•'iE BY SPECIAL REVIEW c '. ,r / ,+ ,-�, Department of Planning Services, 915 Tenth Street, Greeley1olorado7) 1jD � II Phone - 356-4000 - Ext. 400 Case Number Date Received Application Checked by .d i 1 Application Fee / 5.-c a Receipt Number r / '1 5.1 Recording Fee ft_a r Receipt Number 4`?/„ t TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT: (please print or type, except for necessary signature) I (we) , the undersigned, hereby request hearings before the Weld Cous•,,y Planning Commission and the Weld County Board of County Commissionens -concerning the pro- posed Special Review Permit of the following described unincorporated area of Weld County Colorado: LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF SPECIAL REVIEW PERMIT AREA:part of NEB Section 34 T 5 N, R 65 w LEGAL DESCRIPTION of contiguous property owned upon which Special Review Permit is proposed: Section T N, R W Property Address (if available) 21588 Weld C'n„nty Rnad #52 PRESENT ZONE Agricultural OVERLAY ZONES MflNP TOTAL ACREAGE 14. 19 +/ • - PROPOSED LAND USE Oilfield Construction Yard EXISTING LAND USE SAME - - Was previously farm & dairy SURFACE FEE (PROPERTY OWNERS) OF AREA PROPOSED FOR REZONING: Name: Timothy J. & Donna J. Sharp Address: 21588 Weld Co. Rd. 52 City Greeley, CO Zip 80631 Home Telephone # 330-1511 Business Telephone # 330-1511 Name: Address: City Zip Home Telephone # Business Telephone 4 Name Address: City Zip Home Telephone # Business Telephone # APPLICANT OR AUTHORIZED AGENT (if different than above) : Name: Address: City Zip Home Telephone # Business Telephone # Owner(s) and/or lessees of mineral rights on or under the subject properties of record in the Weld County Assessor's Office: Name: Joseph W. & Katherine M. Brantner • Address: 2127 Buena Vista Dr. City Greeley, CO Zip 80631 Name: BASIN EXPLORATION Address: 425 W. Mulberry #208 City Ft. Collins, CO Zip 80521 Name: Address: City Zip I hereby depose and state under the penalities of perjury that all statements, proposals and/or plans submitted with or contained within this application are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. COUNTY OF WELD STATE OF COLORADO ) / �/ / _ i /24- jam, . Signature: ,Owzier or Authorized` Agent " Subscribed and sworn to before me this ,3(n day of ,‘ 19 0 ; tL co NOTARY PUBLIC My commission expires '•r..i expres Feb. 73, 1985 x citathAvii services Inc. iiatifigetiMelkikaigaiblidliMMINARMilet WELD COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION 915 10th Street Greeley, Colo 80631 RE: USE BY SPECIAL REVIEW APPLICATION 1. a. We feel that our proposal will be consistant with the Weld County comprehensive plan, in the fact that we are doing little more than the average large scale farmer. We will be storing our machinery in the confined area on the map. The proposed shop is to enable us to do our repairs out of the harsh weather. b. Our plan is consistant with the intent of the district in which the use is located, in the fact that our nearest neighbor that could be disturbed is over 800 feet away from where the equipment is to be stored and our traffic should be of no interference to anyone. Also, there are several other small construction businesses in our area which cause no problem to anyone. c. See a and b above. - d. We feel this would fit with the county plans in the fact that we are 3 miles from the nearest residential area, and 2 miles from the nearest commercial area. We feel that it would take several years for the residential area to get this far. e. N/A f. The ground we intend to use is basically seep ground, not productive farm land. We have already hauled in extensive amounts of fill, in order to use this land for storage of our equipment. g. As most farmer' s in the area do store and maintain their equipment on their property with no danger of health, safety, or welfare, we feel that our use would not be any more extensive than their' s is today. We have, however, put up several trees and a 6 ' high privacy fence along the roadway to keep anything from becoming an eye-sore or causing any distraction to persons driving past our location. (CONTINUED) \� ( . Page 2 (CONTINUED) 5. a. Type of use will be to store and maintain the equipment necessary to operate our business; Black Hawk Services , Inc. ; which is in the excavation and road building busi- ness , primarily oil field related, partially agricultural related. We also do roustabout work. The term rousta- bout is used in describing the people necessary to build the tank batteries and piping and fencing work around the oil field locations. b. Proximity would be about 100 ' from the owner ' s homesite and about 800 ' from the next nearest residence which is across the county road and about 700 ' to the west. c. There would be only 1 shift worked. At the present time we employ approximately 15 people. There are times when we employ as many as 30 . For future expansion, we could say the top number of employees at any one time would be 50. There would be no more than 5 in the varu at any one time; the rest would be in the field working. d. 10 f. N/A g. One shop added to, which is now 26 ' x 60 ' . We would like to add an addition to this of 60 ' x 60 ' , which would leave the main shop 85 ' x 60 ' approximately. There are presently an old milk barn that we restored and use for storage of pipe, fittings , etc. Also a 35 ' x 35 ' metal building which was used to house combines and we now use it for storage of tires , oil, and miscellaneous items. h. The type, size , weight, and frequency of vehicular traffic and access routes that will be utilized are as follows: 2 - Semi trucks 5 - 2-ton trucks 10 - pickup trucks These would travel the road a maximum of twice a day per vehicle; once going out to work and once coming in from work. Also, the necessary number of cars for the employees to get to the job once in the morning and again in the evening to go home. The routes they would use mainly would be county road #43 and county road #52. However, there could be the use of county road #49 involved also. i. The primary sewer usage is a septic system, already in existance. j . There will be no stock piles of any materials. The waste areas are taken care of by dumpsters , which are dumped when necessary, by Bunting Trash Service. Storage has already been explained by the fact that we have a storage building that used to be a milk barn. (CONTINUED) I Page 3 (CONTINUED) k. Trash is removed as necessary by Bunting Trash Service in their dumpsters. 1. Everything is already constructed and was operated as a farm, so there will be no construction. m. We have already planted 50 to 75 trees and erected a 6 ' privacy fence. These items were put up to cut down on the visibility. n. The reclamation would be actually to put the ground back to farming or to a farm yard. o. We have many fire extinguishers placed around the various buildings and various places around the yard. We are also under the LaSalle volunteer fire department district. O en n 'N S'jI •N b 1 AnwitQ fr`Lac i . c7; t ftX t e is) 46 CC m .eR .„,--.4,-,.:,,,,--„fq N W N d a cCri # F+ .r i.a'a.`ay� Kx t,7z' zv,'� "] ,#,m..�.e�*t .,rte . X S� r xgsi eiR a41 ` qtr'it :'4„ A 1• - ''�Y`.a{#-� ;9-Cc —Cc 'tic' 0 1 " 1 w 7a s t. p(eq.- .x ' Q a Lq� // n'. ''y;'r,'x'zk".tN a. �, +i'r •k" t,it RF "�;,•ry ; c. r € n V 1 m -,I.. .‘..1;.Y F \ A ai"r' t x' r :3.0.2;A:47 v �k ¢ f - 7iC51y�\�Jj� `Nr 4.tr f -Iv:".... .f 111 . .iX { rq y+w y+ .+ .. A & z r x AWN ,r� U 1 a m s v r1 \ \ n .. �tM ''' r ' \ f 0. b 71:..1./* J\\ - CV n. + ' b 0.. DL, b - \\ 2 z u \ . A`3'� 4R'^ _ iii N Q +j I'' ( r. 1 N a' 1_ 1 _ _ `\ `�` WELD COUNTY, COLORADO, SOUTHERN PART 'l brief description of the soil profile. In each description, The acreage and proportionate extent of each map unit the principal hazards and limitations are indicated, and are given in table 4, and additional information on proper- the management concerns and practices needed are ties, limitations, capabilities, and potentials for many soil discussed. uses is given for each kind of soil in other tables in this The map units on the detailed soil maps represent an survey. (See "Summary of tables.") Many of the terms area on the landscape made up mostly of the soil or soils used in describing soils are defined in the Glossary. for which the unit is named. Most of the delineations shown on the detailed soil map are phases of soil series. Soil descriptions Soils that have a profile that is almost alike make up a _ soil series. Except for allowable differences in texture of 1—Altvan loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes. This is a deep, the surface layer or of the underlying substratum, all the well drained soil on terraces at elevations of 4,500 to 4,900 soils of a series have major horizons that are similar in feet. It formed in old alluvium deposited by the major composition, thickness, and arrangement in the profile. A rivers. Included in mapping are small areas of soils that soil series commonly is named for a town or geographic show evidence of poor drainage. Also included are small, feature near the place where a soil of that series was long and narrow areas of sand and gravel deposits. first observed and mapped. Olney and Nunn, for example, Typically the surface layer of the Altvan soil is grayish are names of two soil series. brown loam about 10 inches thick. The subsoil is brown Soils of one series can differ in texture of the surface and light yellowish brown clay loam and sandy clay loam layer or in the underlying substratum and in slope, ero- about 15 inches thick. The substratum is calcareous loamy sion, stoniness, salinity, wetness, or other characteristics sand about 6 inches thick over gravelly sand. that affect their use. On the basis of such differences, a Permeability and available water capacity are soil series is divided into phases. The name of a soil phase moderate. The effective rooting depth is 20 to 40 inches. commonly indicates a feature that affects use or manage- Surface runoff is slow, and the erosion hazard is low. ment. For example, Olney fine sandy loam, 1 to 3 percent This soil is used almost entirely for irrigated crops. It slopes, is one of several phases within the Obey series. is suited to all crops commonly grown in the area, includ- Some map units are made up of two or more dominant ing corn, sugar beets, beans, alfalfa, small grain, potatoes, kinds of soil. Such map units are called soil complexes and and onions. An example of a suitable cropping system is 3 undifferentiated groups. to 4 years of alfalfa followed by corn, corn for silage, A soil complex consists of areas of two or more soils sugar beets, small grain, or beans. The high clay content that are so intricately mixed or so small in size that they and the rapidly permeable substratum slightly restrict cannot be shown separately on the soil map. Each area in- some crops. eludes some of each of the two or more dominant soils, All methods of irrigation are suitable, but furrow ir- and the pattern and proportion are somewhat similar in rigation is the most common (fig. 4). Proper irrigation all areas. Midway-Shingle complex, 5 to 20 percent slopes, water management is essential. Barnyard manure and is an example. An undifferentiated commercial fertilizer are needed for top yields. group is made up of two or more Windbreaks and environmental plantings of trees and soils that could be mapped individually but are mapped as shrubs commonly grown in the area are generally well one unit because there is little value in separating them. suited to this soil. Cultivation to control competing The pattern and proportion of the soils are not uniform. An area shown on the map has at least one of the domi- vegetation should be continued for as many years as nant (named) soils or may have all of them. Loup-Boel Possible following planting. Trees that are best suited and loamy sands, 0 to 3 percent slopes, is an undifferentiated have good survival are Rocky Mountain juniper, eastern redcedar, ponderosa pine, Siberian elm, Russian-olive, and group in this survey area. hackberry. The shrubs best suited are skunkbush sumac, Most map units include small, scattered areas of soils other than those that appear in the name of the map unit. lilac, Siberian peashrub, and American plum. Some of these soils have properties that differ substan- This soil can produce habitat elements that are highly tially from those of the dominant soil or soils and thus suitable for openland wildlife, including pheasant, cotton- could significantly affect use and management of the map tail, and mourning dove. Such crops as wheat, corn, and unit. These soils are described in the description of each alfalfa provide suitable habitat for openland wildlife, map unit. Some of the more unusual or strongly contrast- especially pheasant. Tree and shrub plantings and ing soils that are included are identified by a special sym- undisturbed nesting cover would enhance openland wil- bol on the soil map. dlife populations. Most mapped areas include places that have little or no This Altvan soil has fair to good potential for urban soil material and support little or no vegetation. Such and recreational development. The chief limiting soil fea- places are called miscellaneous areas; they are delineated tures for urban development are the shrink-swell poten- on the soil map and given descriptive names. Rock out- tial of the subsoil as it wets and dries and the rapid crop is an example. Some of these areas are too small to permeability of the sand and gravel substratum. Septic be delineated and are identified by a special symbol on tank absorption fields function properly, but in places the the soil map. substratum does not contain enough fines to properly -8 SOIL SURVEY filter the leachate. Sewage lagoons require sealing. 60 percent of the unit. Aquents, which have a lighter Lawns, shrubs, and trees grow well. Capability subclass colored surface layer, make up about 35 percent. About 5 IIs irrigated. percent is Aquepts and Bankard sandy loam. 2—Altvan loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes. This is a deep, These are deep, poorly drained soils that formed in well drained soil on terraces at elevations of 4,500 to 4,900 recent alluvium. No one pedon is typical. Commonly the feet. It formed in old alluvium deposited by the major soils have a mottled, mildly alkaline to moderately al- rivers. Included in mapping are small areas of soils that kaline loamy or clayey surface layer and underlying show evidence of poor drainage. Also included are small, material and are underlain by sand or sand and gravel long and narrow areas of sand and gravel deposits. within 48 inches. In places they have a gleyed layer in the Typically the surface layer of this Altvan soil is grayish underlying material brown loam about 10 inches thick. The subsoil is brown Most of the acreage is subject to flooding. The water and light yellowish brown clay loam and sandy clay loam table is at or near the surface early in spring and recedes about 14 inches thick. The substratum is calcareous loamy to as deep as 48 inches late in fall in some years. sand about 5 inches thick over gravelly sand. These soils are used for rangeland and wildlife habitat. Permeability and available water capacity are Some small areas have been reclaimed by major drainage moderate. The effective rooting depth is 20 to 40 inches. and leveling and are used for irrigated crops. Surface runoff is medium, and the erosion hazard is low. The potential native vegetation is dominated by alkali This soil is used almost entirely for irrigated crops. It sacaton, switchgrass, and western wheatgrass. Saltgrass, is suited to all crops commonly grown in the area, includ- sedge, rush, and alkali bluegrass are also prominent. ing corn, sugar beets, beans, alfalfa, small grain, potatoes, Potential production ranges from 3,000 pounds per acre in and onions. An example of a suitable cropping system is 3 favorable years to 2.000 pounds in unfavorable years. As to 4 years of alfalfa followed by corn, corn for silage, range condition deteriorates, the switchgrass, alkali sugar beets, small grain, or beans. Land leveling, ditch sacaton, and western wheatgrass decrease and saltgrass, lining, and installing pipelines may be needed for proper sedge, and rush increase. water application. Management of vegetation should be based on taking All methods of irrigation are suitable, but furrow ir- half and leaving half of the total annual production. Seed- rigation is the most common. Barnyard manure and com- ing is difficult and costly because numerous tillage prac- mercial fertilizer are needed for top yields. tices are required to eliminate the saltgrass sod. Windbreaks and environmental plantins of trees and Switchgrass, western wheatgrass, alkali sacaton, tall shrubs commonly grown in the area are are generally well wheatgrass, and tall fescue are suitable for seeding. They suited to this soil. Cultivation to control competing can be seeded into a clean, firm seedbed. Seedbed vegetation should be continued for as many years as preparation usually requires more than 1 year to possible following planting. Trees that are best suited and eliminate the saltgrass sod. A grass drill should be used. have good survival are Rocky Mountain juniper, eastern Seeding early in spring has proven most successful. redcedar, ponderosa pine, Siberian elm, Russian-olive, and Wetland wildlife, especially waterfowl, utili'a this unit. hlac, Si ry. The shrubs best suited are skunkbush sumac, The wetland plants provide nesting and protective cover, lilac, Siberian can peashrub,produce and m plum. as well as some food. The nearby irrigated cropland, This soil habitat elements that are highly suitable for openland wildlife including pheasant,'cotton- where wildlife obtain much of their food and fmd protec- tail, and mourning dove. Such crops as wheat, corn, and tive cover, makes this unit valuable to both wetland and alfalfa provide suitable habitat for openland wildlife, openland wildlife. especially pheasant. Tree and shrub plantings and Openland wildlife, especially pheasant, use this unit for undisturbed nesting cover would enhance openland wil- cover and nesting. Deer find excellent cover in some Wife populations. _ areas. This Altvan soil has fair to good potential for urban These valuable wildlife areas should be protected from and recreational development. The chief limiting soil fea- fire and fenced to prevent encroachment and overuse by tures for urban development are the shrink-swell poten- livestock. They should not be drained. tial of the subsoil as it wets and dries and the rapid These soils have good potential as a source of sand and permeability of the sand and gravel substratum. Septic gravel. Cabblity subclass VIwy Salt eadow range site. tank absorption fields function properly, but in places the 'r4- d.MAquolis and Aquepts, floodeThis nearly level substratum does not contain enough fines to properly map unit is in depressions in smooth plains and along the filter the leachate. Sewage lagoons require sealing, bottoms of natural drainageways throughout the survey Lawns, shrubs, and trees grow well. Capability subclass area. Aquolls, which have a dark colored surface layer, , Ile irrigated. make up about 55 percent of the unit. Aquepts, which 3—Aquolls and Aquents, gravelly substratum. This have a lighter colored surface layer, make up about 25 nearly level map unit is on bottom lands and flood plains percent. About 20 percent is soils that are well drained of all the major streams in the survey area. Aquolls, and soils that have sandstone or shale within 48 inches of which have a dark colored surface layer, make up about the surface. WELD COUNTY, COLORADO, SOUTHERN PART 9 These are deep, poorly drained soils that formed in If summer fallowed in alternate years, this soil is well recent alluvium. No one pedon is typical. Commonly the suited to winter wheat, barley, and sorghum. Winter soils-have a mottled,-mildly to moderately alkaline loamy wheat is the principal crop. Thepredicted average yield is or clayey surface layer and underlying material that ex- _33 bushels per acre. If the crop is winterkilled, spring tends to a-depth of 60 inches or more. In places they have wheat can be seeded. Generally precipitation is too low a gleyed layer in the underlying material. for beneficial use of fertilizer. Most of the acreage is subject to excessive runoff. The Stubble mulch farming, striperopping, and minimum til- water table is at or near the surface in spring and during lage are needed to control-soil blowing and water erosion. the peak of the irrigation season. Terracing also may be needed to control water erosion. These soils are used for rangeland and wildlife habitat. The potential native vegetation on this range site is Some small areas are irrigated pasture. dominated by sand bluestem, sand reedgrass, and blue The potential native vegetation is dominated by grama. Needleandthread, switchgrass, sideoats grama, switchgrass, prairie cordgrass, saltgrass, alkali sacaton, and western wheatgrass are also prominent. Potential big bluestem, indiangrass, western wheatgrass, slender Production ranges from 2,200 pounds per acre in-favora- wheatgrass, sedge, and rush. Cattails and bullrush grow ble years to 1,800 pounds in unfavorable years. As range in the swampy spots associated with these range sites. condition deteriorates, the sand bluestem, sand reedgrass, Potential production ranges from 4,000 pounds per acre in and switchgrass decrease and blue grama, sand dropseed, favorable years to 3,000 pounds in unfavorable years. As and sand sage increase. Annual weeds and grasses invade the site as range condition becomes poorer. range condition deteriorates, the tall and mid grasses decrease, production drops, and saltgrass, sedge, and rush Management of vegetation should be based on taking increase. The farming and irrigation in adjacent areas has half and leaving half of the total annual production. Seed- ing is desirable if the range is in poor condition. Sand increased the amount of salts on much of the acreage. bluestem, sand reedgrass, switchgrass, sideoats Management of vegetation on this soil should be based grama,on taking half and leaving half of the total annual produc- blue grama, pubescent wheatgrass, and crested wheat- grass are suitable for seeding. The grass selected should tion. Switchgrass, big bluestem, indiangrass, western meet the seasonal requirements of livestock. It can be wheatgrass, pubescent wheatgrass, intermediate wheat- -seeded into a clean, firm sorghum stubble, or it can be grass, tall wheatgrass, and tall fescue are suitable for drilled into a firm prepared seedbed. Seeding early in seeding. The plants selected should met the seasonal -spring has proven most successful. requirements of livestock. For successful seeding, a firm Windbreaks and environmental plantings are generally prepared seedbed is needed. A grass drill should be used. suited to this soil. Soil blowing, the principal hazard in Seeding early in spring has proven most successful. Til- -establishing trees and shrubs, can be controlled by cul- lage is needed to eliminate the undesirable vegetation. tivating only in the tree row and by leaving a strip of Wetland wildlife, especially waterfowl, utilize this unit. vegetation between the rows. Supplemental irrigation The wetland plants provide nesting and protective cover may be needed at the time of planting and during dry as well as some food. The nearby irrigated cropland, periods. Trees that are best suited and have good survival where wildlife obtain much of their food and find protec- are Rocky Mountain juniper, eastern redcedar, ponderosa tive cover, makes this unit valuable to both wetland and pine, Siberian elm, Russian-olive, and hackberry. The openland wildlife. - shrubs best suited are skunkbush sumac, lilac, and Siberi- Openland wildlife, especially pheasant, use this unit for an peashrub. cover and nesting. Deer find excellent cover in some Wildlife is an important secondary use of this soil. The areas. These valuable wildlife areas should be protected cropland areas provide favorable habitat for ring-necked from fire and fenced to prevent encroachment and pheasant and mourning dove. Many nongame species can overuse by livestock. They should not be drained. Capa- be attracted by establishing areas for nesting and escape bility subclass VIw; Aquolls in Salt Meadow range site, cover. For pheasants, undisturbed nesting cover is essen- Aquepts in Wet Meadow range site. tial and should be included in plans for habitat develop- -5—Ascalon sandy loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes. This is ment. Rangeland wildlife, for example, the pronghorn an- a deep, well drained soil on uplands at elevations of 4,600 telope, can be attracted by developing livestock watering to 5,200 feet. It formed in alluvium. Included in mapping facilities, managing livestock grazing, and reseeding are small areas of rock outcrop. where needed. Typically the surface layer is brown sandy loam about Few areas of this Ascalon soil are in major growth and 10 inches thick. The subsoil is pale brown and yellowish urbanized centers. The shrink-swell potential of the sub- brown sandy clay loam about 15 inches thick. The sub- soil as it wets and dries is the most limiting soil feature stratum to a depth of 60 inches is calcareous fine sandy that must be considered in planning homesites and con- loam. structing roads. Capability subclass IIIe nonirrigated; Permeability is moderate. Available water capacity is Sandy Plains range site. high. The effective rooting depth is 60 inches or more. 6—Ascalon sandy loam, 3 to 5 percent slopes. This is Surface runoff is slow, and the erosion hazard is low. a deep, well drained soil on uplands at elevations of 4,600 ( (- REFERRAL LIST APPLICANT: Timothy and Donna Sharp CASE NUMBER: USR-602:83:65 SENT REFERRALS OUT: December 1, 1983 REFERRALS TO BE RECEIVED BY December 27, 1983 m m z m 0 m o ZH z H H a z ¢ 44 U) U U Z 0 U 0 Pz 8 W H W m O U O W 0 H W W U O U O W W U 0 � a 0 0 m a z County Attorney (plat only) La Salle Fire Protection Dist. _ c/o Gary Sandau Weld County Health Department P.O. Box 245 X XX La Salle, Colorado 80645 Engineering Department X XX Paulette Weaver County Extension Agent Planning Commission Member 1725 12th Avenue _ Colorado Geological Survey Greeley, Colorado 80631 1313 Sherman Street _ Room 703 Greeley Soil Conservation Denver, Colorado 80203 7 Service 4302 West 9th Street Road iGreeley, Colorado 80634 City of Evans X c/o Glen Crowson P.O. Box 59 3700 Golden St. jState Engineer Evans, Colorado 80620 Division of Water Resources 1313 Sherman St. , Room 818 Denver, Colorado 80203 State Highway Department 1420 2nd Street Greeley, Colorado 80631 Colorado Department of Health Water Quality Control Division 4210 East 11th Avenue Denver, Colorado 80220 themBRA n 1rI aim To James Mayerl, Planning Date December 29, 1983 COLORADO From Ronald K. Stow, Environmental Health 7 Subject: USR-602:83:65 Sharp/Oilfield Construction Yard Our Comments are: 1. Colorado Noise Standards (C.R.S. 25-12-101 et. seq.) must be maintained. 2. Hazardous Substance Reporting (C.R.S. 29-22-107(2) (a)) must be complied with if the materials and quantities held on site are sufficient per that statute RKS/cam r\cr \, 'DEG "J 01963�i.V Weld Co. Planning Commission 4x0 - i � � r +�' 4✓tY l i� December 19, 1983 Mr. James R. Mayerl Department of Planning Services 915 10th Street Greeley, Colorado 80631 Dear Mr, Mayerl, The La Salle Fire Protection District has reviewed the proposal of Timothy & Donna Sharp for an oilfield constrution yard, to be located at 21588 Weld County Road 52, We find no conflicts with our interests as long as the construction and operation of this company complies with all applicable Codes and Standards adopted by the State of Colorado and/or the County of Weld. We have included with this letter a copy of portions of Senate Bill Number 172, Concerning Hazardous Substance Incidents, and Providing for a Statewide System for the Prevention Thereof and the Response Thereto. We would ask that the La Salle Fire Department be notified after construction of the building is completed so that they may get the necessary information refered to in the Senate Bill 172 and also recommend fire extinguisher locations on site. Thank you for this opportunity to comment on this proposal. Sincerely, v1 Gary andau, Fire Marshal La Salle Fire Department cI; Loll o .I _ \' 1\ b:c 201983 Meld Co. Planning Commission 118 MAIN STREET `'.0. ?OX $14 i_,A SALLE, COLORADO 80645 moneys recovered by the attorney general shall be transmitted to the state treasurer, who shall credit the same to the emergency response cash fund. Nothing in this article shall be construed to enlarge or impair any right of recovery or subrogation arising under any other provision of law. The attorney general shall not attempt to recover any moneys from any person responding to a hazardous substance incident pursuant to a mutual aid agreement or to any provision of this article. 29-22-106. Emergency response cash fund. (1) There is hereby created, in the office of the state treasurer, the emergency response cash fund. All moneys collected by the attorney general pursuant to section 29-22-105 and all civil penalties collected pursuant to section 29-22-107 (3) shall be transmitted to the state treasurer, who shall credit the same to the emergency response cash fund. In addition, the general assembly shall annually determine an amount, if any, to be appropriated to said fund. (2) All moneys in the emergency response cash fund are hereby appropriated to the executive director of the department of local affairs to be used as provided in section 29-22-105. The controller, upon presentation of vouchers properly drawn and signed by the executive director of the department of local affairs , shall issue warrants drawn on the emergency response cash fund. All moneys credited to the emergency response cash fund shall remain in said fund to be used as provided in this article and shall not revert to the general fund at the end of any fiscal year. (3) The department of local affairs shall request additional appropriations to the emergency response cash fund when its balance has decreased to below ten thousand dollars. I29-22-107. , Leaislative finding - hazardous substance listingrequi�ed. (1) The general assembly finds , determines, and declares: 37 That the protection of the public from the dangers of hazardous substance incidents occurring on private property, other than residential or agricultural property, is a matter of statewide concern; '..(bij That, without the provisions of this section, such protection is inadequate; and r--'"'1 (c) That the provisions of this section are enacted in the exercise of the police powers of this state for the purpose of protecting the peace, health, safety, and welfare of the people of this state: PAGE 6-SENATE BILL NO. 172 6 person who, in accordance with the following table, possesses the specified quantity, or a quantity in excess of that specified, of any hazard type of hazardous substance on private property shall provide the designated emergency response authority and the waste management division of the department of health with a listing of the maximum quantity of each such hazard type reasonably anticipated to be present on the property at any time: Hazard type Quantity Class A or B explosive Any quantity Class C explosive 50 pounds Etiological agent Any quantity Water reactive flammable solid 5 pounds Pyrophoric material 5 pounds Organic/inorganic peroxide 50 pounds Poison A or poison B 100 pounds or 15 gallons Flammable liquid other than a pyrophoric liquid 700 pounds or 120 gallons Compressed flammable gas other than liquefied petroleum gases 3,000 cubic feet or more at one atmosphere at seventy degrees Fahrenheit Liquefied petroleum gases Any installation exceeding 18,000 gallon water capacity Oxidizer 200 pounds or 120 gallons Combustible liquid Class I 120 gallons Class II 240 gallons Class III 500 gallons Corrosive material 200 pounds or 120 gallons • (unless a lesser amount is specified in 49 Code of Federal Regulations Part 172. 101) Irritating material 200 pounds or 120 gallons With respect to the terms listed as hazard types in the table in paragraph (a) of this subsection (2): ' ( I) "Pyrophoric material" means any material which ignites' spontaneously in dry or moist air at or below one hundred thirty degrees Fahrenheit; The remaining terms shall have the meanings ascribed to them in 49 Code of Federal Regulations Subchapter C, as in effect on July 1, 1983. (c)_„ The listing required in this subsection (2) shall be updated at least annually. PAGE 7-SENATE BILL NO. 172 RE:, 4 , , ,iii, re,, , _„ , . ,, ,�� rt I N1u>rae (1031 3564000 Exr -4(1r �\ �i �� 91510EHSTRELT , GRE ELEY,COLORADO 8063' ® 'c CASE NUMBER USR-602:83:65 • COLORADO;y DO December 1, 1983 JJ1.Y�11�J 2 REFERRAL TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Enclosed is an application from Timothy and Donna Sharp for a Use by Special Review Permit for an oilfield construction yarn • The parce.L of land is described as part of the N511+, Section 35, 15:, R65`.: of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado The location of the parcel of land for which this application has been submitted is two (2) miles southeast of Evans; south of Weld County Road 52 and east of Weld County Road 43 This application is submitted to your office for review and recommenda- tions . Any comments or recommendations you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Your prompt reply will help to facili- tata the processing of the proposal and will ensure prompt considera- tion of your recommendations. If a response from your office is not received within 14 days of mailing from our office, it may be in- terpreted to mean approval by your office. If you are unable to respond within 14 days (but wish to do so at a later date) please notify our office to that effect . Check the appropriate boxes below and return to our address listed above. Please reply by December 27, 1983, so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Thank you very much for . your help and cooperation in this matter . 1 . ✓ We have reviewed the proposal and find no conflicts with our interests . 2. A foLmal recommendation is under consideration and will be submitted to you prior to • 3 . Please refer to the enclosed letter. Signed X74../ r,4, ki74,,,...,{,au,w Agency k ALL 1,1„= At Date it -/-7..—Ft c 7.i A /%27 r/) J s R. Mayerl, Cucreni Planner JRM:rjg I•�O.HY. Ln�,�WJ •Ay4',+v`V)"1 Q4:,<WA.:1Y .r rc..a f:C)t? I I . (,_ .Blur [RVICE, �.r!e. ono r o��;l a,r,-�000 EX r 4flt � J i l �),; I �� I 91 5 10 L H STREET tl��! c� ---- 1 GREELEY COLORADO 8063' p. i' Ps 1� 0 9.c3 I !,-- , lit- ® It -u CASE NUMBER USR-602:83:65 COLORADO Wald Co. Planning Commission December 1, 1983 REFERRAL TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Enclosed is an application from Timothy and Donna Sharp for a Use by Special Review Permit for an oilfield construction yard . The parcel of land is described as part of the NE1, Section 34, T5N, R65W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado The location of the parcel of land for which this application has been submitted is two (2) miles southeast of Evans; south of Weld County Road 52 and east of Weld County Road 43 This application is submitted to your office for review and recommenda- tions . Any comments or recouunendations you consider relevant to this recuest would be appreciated. Your prompt reply will help to facili- tate the processing of the proposal and will ensure prompt considera- tion of your recommendations . If a response from your office is not • received within 14 days of mailing from our office, it may be in- terpreted to mean approval by your office. If you are unable to respond within 14 days (but wish to do so at a later date) please notify our office to that effect. Check the appropriate boxes below and return to our address listed above. Please reply by December 27, 1983, so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Thank you very much for your help and cooperation in this matter . 1 . We have reviewed the proposal and find no conflicts with our interests . 2. A formal recommendation is under consideration and will be submitted to you prior to 3 . X Please refer to the enclosed letter . Signed Agency Date /a •(v --le?, >g ie 71C , r:/;) z Jaa*s A. :-layerl, Cusr Planner JRX_rjy - Case ::umoerusR-602:83:65 1 ri _ intr . "'= .15 'r)TkISTqEE- ah ;. ( --- December 2, t983 COLORADO I ILi ' ? , 1963 I I� Weld Co. Planning Commission TO 71HC'.1 IT MAY CONCE3::: Enclosed is an soplication from Timothy and Donna Sharp for a Use by Special Review Permit for an oilfield construction yard The parcel of land is described as part of the NE 1/4, Section 34. T5N, R65W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County. Colorado The location of the parcel of land for which this application has been submitted is two (2) miles southeast of Evans; south of Weld County Road 52 and east of Weld County Road 43 This application is submitted to your office for review and recommendations. Any comments or recommendations you consider relevant to this request would be ap- preciated. Your prompt reply will help to facilitate the processing of the pro- posal and will ensure prompt consideration of your recommendations. If a response from your office is not received within 21 days of mailing from our office, it may be interpreted to mean approval by your office. If you are unable to respond within 21 _-.vs (hut wish to :!o =o at a later date) please notify our office to that effect. Check the appropriate boxes below and return to our address listed above. Please reply by December 17 1983 so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. 1. We have reviewed this request and find that the request (does/ does not) comply with our Comprehensive Flan for the following reasons: 2. We do not have a Comprehensive Plan but we feel this request is (is/ is not) compatible with the interests of our town for the following reasons: Area residents do not object and the use will not adversely affect the City of Evans. 3. A formal recommendation is under consideration and will be submitted to you prior to 4. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Sig r44771440.-,) Agency City of Evans Date 12-15-83 Y anni A /�dministrator Thank you very much for your help and co-operation in this matter. M // fl-a7mes R. 2fayerl, Current Planner -,-=----_ J i i ,7&M:rjg USR-602:83:65 Timothy and Donna Sharp Use by Special Review Permit for an oilfield construction yard Mineral Owners and Leasees Joseph W. and Katherine M. Brantner 2127 Buena Vista Drive Greeley, Colorado 80631 Basin Exploration 425 West Mulberry #208 Fort Collins, Colorado 80521 USR-602:83:65 Timothy and Donna Sharp Use by Special Review Permit for an oilfield construction yard Limon C. Bacon 21482 Weld County Road 52 Greeley, Colorado 80631 Londell A. Bunting 21529 Weld County Road 52 Greeley, Colorado 80631 William and Donna Boulter 101 North Division Street Platteville, Colorado 80651 Leo J. Sitzman 25490 Weld County Road 43 Greeley, Colorado 80631 Hello