The URL can be used to link to this page

Browse Search

Home My WebLink About20071411.tiff Town of Mead /IY�II► , � ' P.O.Box 826 441 Third Street Mead•A Little Town Mead,Colorado 80542-0626 With a Mg Future' (970)535-4477 CERTIFIED MAIL #7006 2150 0002 8658 5032 April 30, 2007 Weld County Board of Commissioners P.O. Box 758 Greeley, CO 80632 RE: Notice of Public Hearing - Edward Minch Annexation Planning Commission - 7:00 P.M., Wednesday, May 16, 2007 Gentlemen: Please be advised that a public hearing before the Mead Planning Commission has been set to review and consider the annexation of the Northwest Quarter of Section 9, Twp. 3 North, Range 68 West of the 6'h P.M., County of Weld, State of Colorado. The property is owned by Edward Minch, 17072 County Rd 5, Mead, CO 80542 and under contract to Intermountain Development and Investments, 1440 W. State St#6, Pleasant Grove, Utah 84062. The property is proposed for the development of approximately 180 single-family dwellings on the 94.252 acres. In accordance with C.R.S. § 31-12-108 (2), this notice has been sent to the Board of County Commissioners and County Attorney for Weld County, and to each special district or school district having territory within the area to be annexed. This notice has also been sent to service providers and those holding a franchise with the Town. Attached is a copy of the published public hearing notice, together with a copy of the applicant's petition for annexation and the adopted resolution finding substantial compliance and initiating annexation proceedings. As one of the Town's referral agencies, you have previously received copies of the"Letter of Intent"provided with the application, maps of the property location and a"concept plan" for the development of the property. Copies of the full application, as well as the full-sized maps submitted with the application are available for review in the Mead Town Hall, 441 - 3rd Street, Mead, Colorado. Written comments may be sent to Michael D. Friesen, Town Manager, Box 626, Mead, CO 80542. C) ;T9 O Very truly yours, m -;O 3m L,�z(.C.e_ `n c) ao Candace Bridgwater In QDP 73-C Town Clerk O _ cn -J �ue`( QVICLC 2007-1411 ac i6-o7 (7° tt,SD, C f \ NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING MEAD PLANNING COMMISSION EDWARD MINCH ANNEXATION NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Board of Trustees of the Town of Mead has adopted a Resolution of Intent initiating annexation proceedings for the "Edward Minch Annexation," said Annexation being more particularly described in the following Resolution No. 17-R-2007. The Planning Commission of the Town of Mead will hold a Public Hearing commencing at 7:00 p.m., Wednesday, May 16, 2007, at the Mead Town Hall, 441 - 3r° Street, Mead, Colorado 80542, for the purpose of reviewing the petition and making a recommendation to the Board of Trustees regarding whether the property proposed to be annexed meets the applicable requirements of the statutes of the State of Colorado and is eligible for annexation to the Town of Mead, and to recommend the appropriate land use for the property, if requested. Any person may appear at the Public Hearing and be heard regarding the matters under consideration. Copies of the petition and supporting material submitted to the Town are on file and available for public inspection in the Office of the Town Clerk, at the Mead Town Hall, 441 - 3rd Street, Mead, Colorado 80542. Dated this 26th day of April, 2007. TOWN OF MEAD, COLORADO By: /s/Candace Bridgwater Town Clerk TOWN OF MEAD, COLORADO RESOLUTION NO. 17-R-2007 A RESOLUTION FINDING SUBSTANTIAL COMPLIANCE AND INITIATING ANNEXATION PROCEEDINGS FOR CERTAIN PROPERTIES IN WELD COUNTY, COLORADO TO THE TOWN OF MEAD, SAID ANNEXATION TO BE KNOWN AS THE EDWARD MINCH ANNEXATION. WHEREAS, a written petition together with four (4) prints of an annexation map for annexation of certain properties have been filed with the Board of Trustees of the Town of Mead by Edward Minch, 17072 County Rd 5, Mead, CO 80542 and Intermountain Development and Investments, 1440 W. State Street, #6, Pleasant Grove, Utah 84062; and WHEREAS, the Board of Trustees has reviewed the petitions and supporting material; and WHEREAS, the Board of Trustees wishes to permit simultaneous consideration of the subject property for annexation and zoning, if requested in the petition; and WHEREAS, the Board of Trustees has reviewed the petitions and desires to adopt by Resolution its findings in regard to the petitions; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF MEAD, COLORADO, as follows: Section 1. The petition, whose legal description is attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated by reference herein, is accepted and determined to be in substantial compliance with the applicable laws of the State of Colorado. Section 2. No election is required under C.R.S. §31-12-107(2). Section 3. No additional terms and conditions are to be imposed except those provided for in the petitions. Section 4. The Board of Trustees will hold a public hearing for the purpose of determining if the proposed annexation complies with C.R.S. §31-12-104, and with C.R.S. §31-12-105, and will hold a public hearing to determine the appropriate zoning of the subject properties if requested in the petition, at the Mead Town Hall, 441 3rd Street, Mead, Colorado 80542, at the following time and date: 7:00 pm, Monday June 11, 2007 Section 5. Any person may appear at such hearing and present evidence relative to the proposed annexation or the proposed zoning. • Section 6. Upon completion of the hearing, the Board of Trustees shall set forth, by resolution, its findings and conclusions with reference to the eligibility of the proposed annexation, and whether the statutory requirements for the proposed annexation have been met, and further, will determine the appropriate zoning of the subject property if requested in the petition. Section 7. If the Board of Trustees concludes, by resolution, that all statutory requirements have been met and that the proposed annexation is proper under the laws of the State of Colorado, the Board of Trustees shall pass one or more ordinances annexing the subject property to the Town of Mead, and shall pass one or more ordinances zoning the subject property if requested in the petition. INTRODUCED, READ, PASSED, AND ADOPTED THIS 9th DAY OF April , 2007. ATTEST: TOWN OF MEAD By /s/Candace Bridgwater By /s/ Richard W. Macomber Candace Bridgwater, Town Clerk Richard W. Macomber, Mayor EXHIBIT A EDWARD MINCH PROPERTY Legal Description: A TRACT OF LAND LOCATED IN THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 68 WEST OF THE 6 P.M., COUNTY OF WELD, STATE OF COLORADO, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE NORTH SECTION LINE OF SAID SECTION 9, N 89°23'24" E, A DISTANCE OF 1235.00 FEET FROM THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 9, THENCE S 3°30'00" W, A DISTANCE OF 30.21 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE: S 3°30'00" W, A DISTANCE OF 480.42 FEET; THENCE N 89°15'20" W, A DISTANCE OF 161.00 FEET; THENCE S 3°30'00" W, A DISTANCE OF 198.00 FEET; THENCE S 12°08'00" W, A DISTANCE OF 329.15 FEET; THENCE N 89°15'20" W, A DISTANCE OF 135.00 FEET; THENCE S 12°28'18" W, A DISTANCE OF 105.28 FEET; THENCE N 89°15'47" E, A DISTANCE OF 169.50 FEET; THENCE S 00°00'00" E, A DISTANCE OF 1187.00 FEET; THENCE S 33°08'30" E, A DISTANCE OF 322.25 FEET; THENCE N 89°16'06" E, A DISTANCE OF 1492.79 FEET; THENCE N 00°05'55" W, A DISTANCE OF 2548.45 FEET TO A POINT, FROM SAID POINT THE NORTH 1/4 CORNER OF SAID SECTION 9 BEARS N 00°05'55" W, A DISTANCE OF 30.13 FEET; THENCE S 89°23'24" W, A DISTANCE OF 1404.72 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. • Letter of Intent Annexation Proposal April 2, 2007 Board of Trustees, Town of Mead: Intermountain Development and Investments (IDI), in connection with Edward Minch living at 17072 County Rd 5, Mead CO 80542, wish to express our intent to annex a 95 acre piece of property currently owned by Edward Minch and under contract to purchase by IDI. The proposed property is located on the west border of the North Creek subdivision, south of County Road 36,north of County Road 34 and east of County Road 5 (See attached legal description). IDI and Mr. Minch would like to propose the start of annexation proceedings for this property. We would like to begin the process in the spring of 2007. The current land use for the area according the Land Use Plan of Mead is Low Density Residential. It is our proposal to change this land use to Medium Low Density Residential upon or before annexation. We would like to have 180 single family units approved for this parcel. On April 24, 2006, IDI appeared before the Board of Trustees and presented a concept plan outlining our ideas and intent for the area. The residential neighborhood consists of one-quarter,one-third,one-half, and two-third acre lots. The master plan includes a series of parks,trails and recreational areas throughout the community. The plan was well received and encouraged at that time. IDI specializes in custom home neighborhoods with a dedication to amenities, parks and recreation for it residents. The Town of Mead and the Highland Lake area will provide the atmosphere desired of country living and a healthy life-style. The decision of County Road 5.5 will affect the design and lay-out of the property. We have included concept plans with and without the proposed county road. IDI is excited to introduce a premiere healthy-living community to Mead. We believe our design will add to the beauty and feel of the Town of Mead. gBarn Intermountain Development and Investments, LLC cc;PL 3SR p 2 3 At kA G P Y 1 nAtAg ( 31 leg pAV 2 g s $ f aFsc5�.6s g q a2 ,n VA it Aaagg'e 4 s€ �^ S4I a I ] a' G�R air €:”. aE R-, s #x ° A It- §' y . P a dP o 5 tie rn3xn _ s a 9" �m p 4 It IAN! ll 44 a a k 5^ I s a¢iiyA S a �� I I � Q §, 9 e,aa.� gg-Pa a xF - , [ ; gt �3 .,JIB a € a t c� g., a G i °r R t a s m S III ' e s°-s v y# $� gg3ea ', m N yp .'� k5- e 4n m• e @4x s� a5. p a 44�,� ie J x O H n & H AS i x5e.� ;�syti s tp�,+ i? v id¢ pa'a4 1 V s A W. a :AI I' �I, ^, . ,.0!:;: ::E_,,;-as e r r c�xir G a0. �r ISa Li I I Vt$ �i a' ra+ as §n a eek�iY �< x� °� gt a5 ° o Ea g a �` §§ n^� ¢ ��T a o $yr ; t 31 31i r 4a•d ₹, ,t Coe @ a a a gAvAi Ag A a gVi s 1xiysa� izS Fv 4y t grl r R 5 r 24-46OAa 8I ai F A I ! 5 Aie s# A.'@ AM x,.�A,§ak t 8a a m e a e pt . s a-sx47, ?≤ a i ₹ 4yg•eE 2 i 26 L s I s t 4x K. 1Jj• ..4:-,- -„.7.q.°� e K. affi ( ..x4.% e 'y OF.,, O .1�� -` a1 6fl i`5.9M1 _ ., AnAT Al 4 a h `)s 1 T .. Fs§i.3 w 4$ H a f 3tri� $ dh.o co o u L I:I i _ o g p, g;•0 ti o ilia I' I }Fir , l { y o0i� : 1 .. a <—-9—f I_ L. i . . L 9 ILE A- , ni y fl W tits; I ii E y -.. ` - °....2' Y7 �� a� • c. E 1. O ' z 3 • Li, it_ AA I,, 3n i e A {J , rie i _ c$ fl g $5 - c It ZgS� b• 71 ts s1 Ip n ek P1y i I � y e o� M .4444, «unz ax pu [erea, ox.ar- l w R I'4 g. F' N t_`4 : XI , .. Master Plan Including Highway County Road 36 .-1,y.,1.:.7: :,:'‘,::.,.'-..:".',.',!:':: : : Iz"�{.f�z'� -W-4:.: I y;Ir" 7 I 1. F' .� rl� w x � 1 ,� J. h ( ' I rte\ ► %. . A I 1 , I LIAA ` I mp Or 1 � 11111111 , I • County Road 34 SITE TABLE Area: ACRES 42 2/3 Acre Lots 7.37 © 43. 1/2 Acre Lots 22.66 1/3 Acre Lots 12.71 + 1/4 Acre Lots 23.13 friT AIrt, r. r)e tl • Open Space 12.79 1 t.r,;N. istNC Ylwo 9.sm w. atom,pr 6109'7 Local Road 'T Recreation Trail t.8o1a82299: t.01102.993 www.ntalab.cmn Master Plan Non-Highway Alternative County Road 36 1 , I / a az'� T�t `" i ?, ,srs ,:t,..:74,-.0%,,„,':EI 1 r !--$:.",,,-.4 %y, /: I yr �( -_ I £ � ,try 1 t n xtr. �.`.d,e5. "d'4.rtlC'' .Illi t-,..7^ ..^ . ,.e. e ' / j ' I 9r' r 1 1 l ar; jir 1 1 L `7�.�L'b. r+-4.6) .s:•":f: 16 t'^ti`"- L .+1 to-_1 rii, e; i" .v"?-a off': County Road 34 SITE TABLE I ACRES © 3/3 Acre Lots 13.03 1/2 Acre Lots 23.51 1/3 Acre Lots 26.39 pgg;;{as,p„g pp y 6� + 1/4 Acre Lots 12.17 AL t o; t eb Ei open space 12.05 �� Local Road Recreation Trail .eo �cem.002S999 t Town of Mead P.O.Box 626 441 Third Street Mud^w Little Town Mead,Colorado 80542-0626 With a Big Future" (970)535-4477 May 9, 2007 • CERTIFIED MAIL # 7006 2150 0002 8658 5834 Weld County Board of Commissioners P.O. Box 758 Greeley, CO 80632 RE: Request for Comments and Recommendations on the Annexation of Edward Minch Annexation. Gentlemen: Enclosed is a copy of the application, annexation maps and other supporting material for the proposed annexation of the Edward Minch Annexation to the Town of Mead. this property is located in Weld County on approximately 94 acres between WCR 36 and WCR 34 '/2 , west of the North Creek subdivision in Mead. The purpose of this referral is to obtain the comments and recommendations of various governmental agencies and service providers as to the appropriateness of the annexation. Your comments are welcome and will assist the Board of Trustees and Planning Commission in their review of the proposal. We ask that your comments reach us no later than June 5, 2007. We ask that you forward your response directly to Samson, Pipis & Marsh, LLC, c/o Gary West, P.O. Box 1079, Longmont, CO 80502. Thank you for your cooperation and assistance. aa Very truly yours, 1 Candace Bridgwater Town Clerk Edward Minch Annexation County Road 36 . � r I 1 1 County Road 341/2 SITE TABLE IArea ACRES + 2/3 Acre Lots 7.37 + 1/2 Acre Lots 22.66 Q1/3 Acre Lots 12.71 + 1/4 Acre Lots 13.13 fitNorthern + Open Space 14.4 ERGINEEPING Local Road .1' ' Recreation Trail Bubble Diagram Only-Actual road alignments and acreages TBD Approximately 180 Single Family Dwelling Units Annexation Application Mead, Colorado Minch Annexation Table of Contents I. Annexation Documents 1. Conceptual Plan Application and Decision Record(Form D-2) 2. Fiscal Impact Analysis(Form D-4) 3. Agreement for Payment of Review Analysis (Form D-5) 4. Agreement for Payment of Election Expense(Form D-6) 5. Annexation Base Fees 5.1 Application Fee—Annexation($300) 5.2 Application Fee—Concept Plan($50) 5.3 Engineering Plans Check Fee ($350) 5.4 Cash Deposit for Reimbursement of Town's Cost ($5000) 6. Letter of Intent 7. Annexation Petition 7.1 Annexation Petition 7.1.1 Signatures of Landowners 7.1.2 Mailing Address of Each Signer 7.1.3 Legal Description of Land Owned 7.1.4 Date of Signature Signing 7.2 Affidavit of Circulator 8. Proof of Ownership(Title Report) 9. Mailing List of Adjacent Property Owners 10. Envelopes for Mailing Notices and Referrals * 11. Annexation Maps 11.1 Annexation Map 11.2 Annexation Map(3 Mylars) * 11.3 Annexation Map Land Surveying Standards Checklist 11.4 Legal Description(Word Processing File) 12. Northern Colorado Water Conservancy District Petition 13. Warranty Deed for Non-Tributary Water Rights 14. Annexation Impact Report 14.1 Annexation Impact Report(Word Processing File) 14.2 Annexation Impact Report Map 15. Concept Plan 15.1 Concept Plan 15.2 Concept Plan (1 Mylar Original) * 15.3 Concept Plan (AutoCAD File) II. Annexation/Development Information 1. Preliminary Soils Report 2. Preliminary Utility Plan 3. Water Rights Report 4. Statement of Community Need 5. Statement of School Impact 6. Development Impact Assessment Statements 6.1 Water 6.2 Sewer 6.3 Natural Gas 6.4 Electric 6.5 Telephone 6.6 Streets 6.7 Drainage 6.8 Law Enforcement 6.9 Fire Protection 6.10 Parks and Recreation 6.11 Environmental Considerations 6.12 Economic Development Potential 7. Development Compatibility Statements 7.1 Street Master Plan 7.2 Subdivision Plan 7.3 Comprehensive Plan 7.4 Land Use Code 7.5 Existing and Adjacent Land Use 8. Drainage Report * Item to be provided with Final Submittal • TOWN OF MEAD LAND USE CODE FORM D-2 CONCEPTUAL PLAN APPLICATION AND DECISION RECORD FOR A MAJOR LAND USE CHANGE Applicable Section(s): Copies Required: A. Conceptual Plan Submission Requirements. 1. Applicant's name, address and telephone number: tan—Y4 Mott�.15nan_ ttiJtp4.0-4. CI a..4 .S-�.vc.�s't&c. 4 s I 4 L..) S-1/4-a4c. S4 (p V(r sP....tk G,rat; LAX IviO2- 2. Legal description of the property proposed for the land use change: SEE Pen-Ar ItFD 3. Proposed land use change located in Mead Performance District No. 1 . 4. Give a brief nonlegal description of the existing land use of the site and of the general character of the use of adjacent lands. Cu.t(CAV4- Low Atm. rk.. Ctrsr.•Q.c...,4 . QS - .1. nt..L ctC.r t•J 0 .c.. k gL..I..L:.;O r D. Iota ..e s td.a-k- .1e pe.i %; - . Ohm.V- t."' t LtwA \0 oft Div ;L.a..rt-sy x aeess tt I -E - 4")C.3 t.Th3 o... So... ,wt6-c con'. { . 5. Give a brief nonlegal description of the proposed land use change including the number of living units,type of home occupation proposed, the placement of a mobile home,`etc. �j el)PoSc YVIc-eR:....�..n �Ow rt_5; rt- al I . S - Z.- - D/A..c . C_t,. t-4 ?r a 63 a.� s1,-.ws 1U - to o et......tr.,,� ....; r .• s:�k.3 `. I,6t r)/4 r t/s r 2/3 at-et ta-ts Mead Form D-2.wpd October 26.1995 Page 1 of 4 If the proposed land use change involves the annexation of land,the applicant must submit a petition and supporting documents in the form prescribed by C.R.S. 31-12-101, et seq. In addition, the applicant shall post a bond or other security as required by Section 16-20-40 of the Mead Municipal Code. 6. Provide a sketch plan of the proposed land use change, including a site analysis consisting of a map, plot plan or diagram showing the total acreage, abutting landowners and land uses, streets, highways, utilities that will service the proposed development; and major physical features, including drainage and the location of natural hazards. [attach maps and sketches as necessary] 7. A master development plan, if the land use change is proposed to be constructed in stages requiring separate reviews and approvals. 8. Provide an elevation drawing of the proposed structure(s) showing height and describing the exterior materials. [attach drawings as necessary] 9. The fiscal impact analysis, Form D-4. 10. Provide other information that the applicant believes will assist the Planning Commission and the Board of Trustees in making a fair decision. [attach additional sheets as necessary] 11. Signature of the Applicant By this acknowledgment, the undersigned hereby certify that the above infomration is complete and true. (If the applicant is not the owner(s) of the subject property, the owner(s), mortgage and/or lienholder shall also sign the Application.) Owner: am./ ( u,,,.AZ, Date: .2 - - 0 7 Owner: Date: Applicant: Date: -O (attac dition gn res as necessary) STATE OF COLORADO ) SS. COUNTY OF Weld ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of ,Gbrvcr4 ,20 by Sdwn.rd Mr+1cl, a..4 5+tr j $4iv1e3 —‘1t'11O311 My commission expires: 63_ �O mow 'tH fl Witness My hand and official sepCJ p �/ f Nvaa Notary Public is '•. MOH * *'**'APPLICANT NOT TO WRITE BELOW THIS LINE'**"***********` f �a' mead Form D.2.wpd October 09,1995 Page 2 of 4 B. Review Agency Comments. 1. Building Official: 2. Town Engineer: 3. Town Attorney: 4. Other Referrals: • C. Further information requested, if any: D. Action by the Planning Commission: 1. The application is complete. Yes[] No[] 2. The application is for a Major Land Use Change. Yes [1 No[] 3. The requirements of the Mead Land Use Code have been satisfied (see attached Form D-5). Yes [] No I 4. If the application is for the annexation of property, has the annexation question benn submitted to, and approved by the electorate? Yes[] No[1 5. The application is: [ ]approved [ ]disapproved [ ]approved with the following conditions: a) b) c) (attach additional conditions as necessary) DONE by the Mead Planning Commission of Mead, Colorado,this_day of ,20 . ATTEST: Secretary to the Commission Chairman E. Action by the Board of Trustees. • Mead Form D-2.wpd October 26,1995 Page 3 of 4 1. The application is complete. Yes[ ] No[ ] 2. The application is for a Major Land Use Change. Yes[ ] No [ ] 3. The requirements of the Mead Land Use Code have been satisfied (see attached Form 0-5).Yes [ ]No [ ] 4. The application is: [ ]approved [ ]disapproved [ ]approved with the following conditions: a) b) c) (attach additional conditions as necessary) DONE by the Mead Board of Trustees of Mead, Colorado,this_day of , 20 ATTEST: — Town Clerk Mayor mead Form 12-2..pa October 26.1995 Page 4 of 4 LEGAL DESCRIPTION EDWARD MINCH PROPERTY A TRACT OF LAND LOCATED IN THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECHON 9, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 68 WEST OF THE SIXTH P.M. COUNTY OF WELD, STATE OF COLORADO, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE NORTH SECTION LINE OF SAID SECTION 9, N 89°23 24"E, A DISTANCE OF 1235.00 FEET FROM THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 9, THENCE S 3°30'00" W, A DISTANCE OF 30.21 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE S 3°30'00" W A DISTANCE OF 480.42 FEET; THENCE N 89°15'20" W, A DISTANCE OF 161.00 FEET; THENCE S 3°30'00" W,A DISTANCE OF 198.00 FEET; THENCE S 12°08'00" W A DISTANCE OF 329.15 FEET; THENCE N 89°15'20" W,A DISTANCE OF 135.00 FEET; THENCE S 12°28'00" W, A DISTANCE OF 105.28 FEET; THENCE N 89°15'47"E, A DISTANCE OF 169.50 FEET; THENCE S 00°00'00"E,A DISTANCE OF1187.00 FEET; THENCE S 33°08'30"E, A DISTANCE OF 322.25 FEET; THENCE N 89°16'06"E, A DISTANCE OF 1492.79 FEET; THENCE N 00°05'55" W,A DISTANCE OF 2548.45 FEET TO A POINT, FROM SAID POINT THE NORTH 1/4 CORNER OF SAID SECTION 9 BEARS N 00°05'55" W, A DISTANCE OF 30.13 FEET; THENCE S 89°23 24" W,A DISTANCE OF 1404.72 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. THUS DESCRIBED TRACT CONTAINS 94.252 ACRES MORE OR LESS, TOGETHER W1TH AND SUBJECT TO ALL EASEMENT AND RIGHT-OF-WAY EXISTING AND/OR OF PUBLIC RECORD. TOWN OF MEAD LAND USE CODE FORM D-4 FISCAL ANALYSIS (Required for all Preliminary and Final Applications) (for Major Land Use Changes) Applicable Section(s): Copies Required: Applicant's name, address and telephone number: ^ . 1N�`EfMOt,tArlcal\N DEVPIO/MeiL /*`/ Gv f S a f 6 Name of the Project: pleAsewt GI'UVt?t UT $Y0 6'Z I. REVENUES. A. Recurring Revenues: 1. Property Tax. Market value all single family units [ '5MM ]I1' x factor[ 7.96 % J12)=Assessed Valuation If 2j t \ Market value all multi-family units [ 3(11 .f(' _ x factor[7.96 % ]0'-1=Assessed Valu lion [ Vj$( Market value all mobile home units [ ]1'1 # /��f(((('''' x factor[7.96 % r=Assessed Valua on L ] Maxfaket ctovalue all non-residential structures [ tal ]111 !_76_____.] / „ ' x factor[ 29% ]hI =Assessed Valuation ,L'f�J7L ] Total Assessed Valuation #C3tS.53ZMil IN Total Assessed Valuation Town mill levy[ 8.919 mills ]13)= Town Property Tax Revenue F 31 1/64.2 \ 2 Total Assessed Valuatior$ 3a5t23OOq x St. Vrain School mill levy[ 39.982 mills ]f31= School Property Tax Revenue [/y3t2.[S.]SZ Total Assessed Valuation[3.'Z‘00(�x Mt. View Fire District mill levy[ 8.037 mills Y31= Fire District Property Tax Revenue ,n,?-n.53 53 b" eveloper's projected market value. 'a'Call county assessor to determine what factor to use in order to obtain current assessed value of proposed development from market value in the area. P1 Contact the Town Clerk for current factors. Mead-Dd Form LUC-Revised 1-31-06.wpd January 31,3006 Page 1 of 6 Total Assessed Valuation [-J cJ uZ-. A Weld County mill levy [ 17.900 mills 1(3'= County Property Tax Revenue [6.5j 51.210 Total Assessed Valuation [--17K7-4)61.21x St. Vrain San. Dist. mil levy[3.918 mills 1(31 = St. Vrain San. Dist. Tax Revenue f Ir331/R Total Assessed Valuation[ a 2‘`cQx all other mill levies [ 4.503 mills ]'3) = Other Property Tax Revenue [/6ti L1.75 Total Property Tax Revenue IP 2,4'13515 2. Sales Tax. Population in the development[ SoO ] x the last year's per capita collection [ $48.46 )'3' 51= total annual sales tax revenue [ Z-1,2 Estimated gross retail sales within the development �q _� [ 1 x 2%"' = total annual sales tax revenue [T (75. 3. Sewer Revenue. t� Population in the development[ SOO ] x the last year's per capita collection ] $75.21 ]'3i = total annual sewer revenue 13-7,6(3 4. Other Revenue (taxes, fees, permits, etc.). �1 Population in the development[ 'SOO ] x the last year's per capita collection j $65.80 ]'3' = total other revenue [ t��a ] Nonresidential- business e licenses, liquor licenses, etc.'3' ,,.�/ = total annual other revenue [ 'r,_�1 TOTAL RECURRING REVENUE [39ft5Z0-]5( B. One-Time Revenues. 1. Building Permits. Market value of structure(s)f 1l SMM]t"x [i c4 factor[ .0099375 + $30.00/BP r3j= building permit revenue [ fi-)S.kt)11 2. Use Taxes. cl,,, � `" ' Market value of structure(s) M ]t+� x 50% x 2% = use tax revenue S/5CIOQ 3. Sewer Plant Investment.Total taps x factor[ $6,000.00 1(31=total PIF [45:661600 4 a 661600 "'Developers projected market value. "'Call county assessor to determine what factor to use in order to obtain current assessed value of proposed development from market value in the area. '"Contact the Town Clerk for current factors. Mead-64 Form LUG Revisal I 3I.O6w$January 31,2006 Page 2 of 6 4. Storm drainage. Number of dwelling units ( i uV ] x $131 [ ��t� = residential storm drainage impact fees Square feet of nonresidential development[ ] }�,y.� x $0.08/sq.ft. = nonresidential storm drainage impact fees [ 'T (/� ] 5. Transportation. 4 7 Number of dwelling units ( tSO] x $1,350 G1 = residential transportation impact fees [2 f3t066i Square$0.3 feet . nrinti l transportation [ V ] [ YJ 1 x $0.37/sq.ft. = nonresidential transportation impact fees 6. Open Space. Number of dwelling units [ 1%0 ]x$1,852 `'�� = residential open space impact fees 13 330 Square feet of nonresidential development[ ] x $0.47/sq.ft. = nonresidential open space impact fees ( 1 0 ] 7. Police Protection. Q�� Number of dwelling units [ l V� 1x $50 41 clj l ]006 = residential police protection impact fees � Square feet of nonresidential development[ V ] � x $0.01/sq.ft. = nonresidential police protection impact fees [ 41 1 8. Municipal Facilities.Number of dwelling units [ /150 50]x$1, 697= residential municipal facilities impact fees 12,, 1frSt1160] Square feet of nonresidential development[ C ] x $0.43/sq.ft. = nonresidential municipal facilities impact fees ( (4 0 ] 9. Park System. Number of dwelling units [ /156]x$462 Ink/4 ��(/ = residential park system impact fees ^[nt f 60] 10. Recreation Center.Number of dwelling units (/CM) 1 x $1, 683 = residential recreation center impact fees "'Developer's projected market value. (21 Call county assessor to determine what factor to use in order to obtain current assessed value of proposed development from market value In the area. (2)Contact the Town Clerk for current factors. Mead-D-4 Form LUC- Revised tatob...va January 3t.zase Page 3 of 6 11. Downtown Revitalization (public facilities). Number of dwelling units [ ' pV] x $304 = residential downtown revitalization impact fees [ 1,72eP 12. Capital Equipment. Number of dwelling units [ V\ ) ] x$316 Q)[C7 ) ] = residential capital equipment impact fees °{ Jb V Square feet of nonresidential development[ ] di 1 x $0.09/sq.ft. = nonresidential capital equipment impact fees 1/U( TOTAL ONE TIME REVENUE 161t)I`6Q-} II. EXPENDITURES. A. Recurring Costs. 1. Street Maintenance. Acres in development[ (1.%.5 ] x 4% x factor[ $2,287.00 ]I Q= total street maintenance costs o\ 1 , 11 2. Police Protection. Projected population at full development[ S OD ] x per capita cost of police protection [ $23.87 J dP I/\9 zc] =total police protection costs 1 Square feet of nonresidential development [ O ] x [ Fs) = nonresidential police protection costs ��{. %V� 3. General Government. Projected population at full development[ SOD ] x per capita cost of general government[ $87.18 i(3) S c,2 0] =total general government costs Square feet of nonresidential development [ 6 ] x [ ]131= nonresidential general government costs 4. Parks and Recreation. Projected population at full development[ SOO ] '�c x per capita cost of park maintenance [$10.00 11't ` l c �� ] = total park maintenance costs 5. Sewer Collection and Treatment. �C Projected population at full development[ S o6 ] (1)Developers projected market value. "1 Call county assessor to determine what factor to use in order to obtain current assessed value of proposed development from market value in the area. "1 Contact the Town Clerk for current factors. Mud-D-4 Form LUC-Revised 1-31-06.wpd January 31,2006 Page 4 of 6 x per capita cost of sewer collection and Q\'"7 treatment [ $100.20 1{3)=total sewer costs 6. Storm Water and Drainage. Projected population at full development [ S 3 x per capita cost of storm water and drainage 0 maintenance [ ](3)=total storm water costs [ ] Square feet of nonresidential development[ O ] x [ r3) = nonresidential storm water costs [ clfr (25 TOTAL RECURRING COSTS '[I Iel 5O B. One-Time Costs. 1. Park and Recreation. Projected population at full development[ S0O ] x .001 facilities per capita x 5,000 sq.ft. x average cost per sq.ft.for recreation facilities J $65.00 = total recreation facilities costs �_➢/Gam/ 2. Sewer Plant. �+-� Projected population at full development [ S0d I x gallons per capita [ 120 gal. ]'3)x cost per gallon of �O, capacity[ $3.50 J") = total cost of sewer plant 1111wwww O06 TOTAL ONE-TIME COSTS *[72i^ ] TOTAL RECURRING REVENUES tiS"li\`3Z0.]SJ TOTAL RECURRING EXPENDITURES $L1,36L3y DIFFERENCE 412q7‘I S9•l? TOTAL ONE-TIME REVENUES 3,3gy 47 TOTAL ONE-TIME EXPENDITURES �,7Z,SOq DIFFERENCE i[3,022,►TR Page 5 of 6 Ill. Signature of the Applicant. By this acknowledgment,the undersigned hereby certify that the above information is complete and true. (If the applicant is not the owner(s)of the subject property, the owner(s), mortgage and/or lienholder shall also sign the Application.) Owner: 5 (9,t.at.A6J Date: .2 - S - a 7 Owner: 1) �� Date: L t� Applicant: �� f cess: (attac a di nal signatures as necessary) STATE OF COLORADO) SS. COUNTY OF Wt( d ). ►T—�� The fore9.oi�ng instrument was acknowledged before me this -" day of f abro a.r Y 2007 by Cdtdafd M1 i'tl.�. atd S rl i,r .�.c,,rnCS I , My commission expires: 03-.24(-2.4a Witness Witness My hand and official seal. of Public ,moo O11PU®1�C lra i :' ROBERT ` fist RYAN fff cN ; SWORD lt\C OCO"- , . 1'I Developer's projected market value. n1 Call county assessor to determine what factor to use in order to obtain current assessed value of proposed development from market value in the area. PI Contact the Town Clerk for current factors. Meth D-4 Fenn LUG Revisal I-31-06.wpd loamy 31,2006 Page 6 of 6 2. EXPENDITURE OF FEES PAID BY THE OWNER. The Town shall expend the monies collected from the Owner in the form of land use fees,in the payment of expenses incurred in processing the Owners request, through the development process until final completion of the project, including, but not limited to,fees charged to the Town for legal publications, engineering services, attomey services, consultant services, reproduction of material, public hearing expenses, the securing of permits and easements and the recording of documents. 3. PAYMENT OF REVIEW AND OTHER EXPENSES BY THE OWNER. In the event that the Town incurs expenses for the review of the Owner's request,through the development process until final completion of the project, greater than the monies collected from the Owner in the form of land use fees,the Owner shall reimburse the Town for the additional expenses. Said reimbursement shall be made within ten (10)days of the Town submitting an invoice for the expenses. Failure by the Owner to pay within the specified time shall be cause for the Town to cease processing the application,or deny approval of the application, withhold the issuance of building permits or certificates of occupancy. 4. APPLICATION TERMINATION. Except where the law or an agreement with the Town provides otherwise, the Owner may terminate his application at any time by giving written notice to the Town. The Town shall immediately take all reasonable steps necessary to terminate the accrual of costs to the Owner e.g., notify newspapers to cancel publications, etc. The Owner will continue to be liable for all costs reasonably incurred by the Town to terminate the application. 5. COLLECTION OF FEES AND COSTS. If the Owner fails to pay the fees required herein when due, the Town may take those steps necessary and authorized by law to collect the fees due. The Town shall also be entitled to all court and attomey's fees, other costs incurred in collection and interest on the amount due at the rate of 18% per annum. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the Town and the Owner have caused this Agreement to be duly executed on the day and year first above written. By this acknowledgment, the undersigned hereby certify that the above information is complete and true_ (If the applicant is not the owner(s)of the subject property, the owner(s), mortgage and/or lienholder shall also sign the Application.) Owner: Er, ...L 7>t,.1 A Owner: Applicant: (atta dditio 4 at res as necessary) ATTEST: TOWN OF MEAD By Town Clerk Mayor O-5FORM W 95 October 28,1995 Page 2 of 3 STATE OF COLORADO ) ) SS. COUNTY OF tA)e-td ) The foo�repyoing instrument was acknowledgeQ before me is a day of 1 �DIU4r< , 200n by IZduisrd t4.nr L nts d My commission expires:03 -2/- zeta Witness My han d fficial l. Notary Pubiir ............ 211 i r ROBERT `: I�r RYAN I Nom. SWORD /c ; tt' OF C ••'•#/ O-5FORM.W P5 October 26.1995 Page 3 of 3 TOWN OF MEAD • LAND USE CODE FORM D-5 AGREEMENT FOR PAYMENT OF REVIEW AND DEVELOPMENT EXPENSES INCURRED BY THE TOWN THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into thi -slay of chat .D. 2ftair by and between the TOWN OF MEAD, COLORADO, a municipal Corporation, hereinafter r erred to as"the Town," and_ twirer•+O 1wasoe:K bt,.oct„Q,,,t_4 r -T.,,,r,GAIN c.,k: , hereinafter referred to as "the Owner," WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the Owner owns of certain property situated in the County of Weld, State of Colorado, and legally described as follows, to-wit: SE-E 4rilt-&H-la fxHtB►r WHEREAS, the development process included all aspects of land use including but not limited to annexation, subdivision, change of land use and the installation of public improvements; and WHEREAS, the Owner desires to develop said property and has made application to the Board of Trustees of the Town of Mead for approval of ; and WHEREAS, the Parties hereto recognize that the land use fees as specified by the Municipal Code of the Town of Mead may not be adequate to fully cover the Town's expenses in considering the referenced application, including, but not limited to, legal publications,engineering services, attorney fees, consultant fees, reproduction of material, public hearing expenses and recording documents; and WHEREAS, the Parties hereto recognize that the Town will continue to incur expenses throughout the entire development process until final completion of the project, including but not limited to engineering services, attorney fees, consultant fees, reproduction of material, securing permits and easements; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and of the mutual promises and conditions hereinafter contained, it is hereby agreed as follows: 1. FULL AND SEPARATE ACCOUNTING OF REVIEW AND DEVELOPMENT EXPENSES. The Town will maintain separate accounts of all monies expended as a result of the review of the above referenced application throughout the development process. Monthly statements of expenses incurred will be made available to the Owner by the Town. Expenses charged to the Owner's account shall include,but shall not be limited to legal publications, engineering services, attorney fees,consultant fees, reproduction of material, public hearing expenses,the securing of permits and easements and the recording of documents. D-5FORM.W P5 October 26.1995 Page 1 of 3 LEGAL DESCRIPTION EDWARD MINCH PROPERTY A TRACT OF LAND LOCATED IN THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 68 WEST OF THE SIXTH P.M, COUNTY OF WELD, STATE OF COLORADO, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE NORTH SECTION LINE OF SAID SECTION 9, N 89°23'24"E,A DISTANCE OF 1235.00 FEET FROM THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 9, THENCE S 3°30'00" W, A DISTANCE OF 30.21 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE S 3°30'00" W, A DISTANCE OF 480.42 FEET; THENCE N 89°15 20" W, A DISTANCE OF 161.00 FEET; THENCE S 3°30'00" W, A DISTANCE OF 198.00 FEET; THENCE S 12°08'00" W, A DISTANCE OF 329.15 FEET; THENCE N 89°15'20" W,A DISTANCE OF 135.00 FEET; THENCE S 12°28'00" W, A DISTANCE OF 105.28 FEET; THENCE N 89°15'47"E, A DISTANCE OF 169.50 FEET; THENCE S 00°00'00"E, A DISTANCE OF1187.00 FEET; THENCE S 33°08'30"E, A DISTANCE OF 322.25 FEET; THENCE N 89°16'06"E,A DISTANCE OF 1492.79 FEET; THENCE N 00°05'55" W,A DISTANCE OF 2548.45 FEET TO A POINT FROM SAID POINT THE NORTH 1/4 CORNER OF SAID SECTION 9 BEARS N 00°05'55" W, A DISTANCE OF 30.13 FEET; THENCE S 89°23'24" W A DISTANCE OF 1404.72 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. THUS DESCRIBED TRACT CONTAINS 94.252 ACRES MORE OR LESS, TOGETHER WITH AND SUBJECT TO ALL EASEMENT AND RIGHT-OF-WAY EXISTING AND/OR OF PUBLIC RECORD. Letter of Intent Annexation Proposal April 2, 2007 Board of Trustees, Town of Mead: Intermountain Development and Investments(IDI), in connection with Edward Minch living at 17072 County Rd 5, Mead CO 80542, wish to express our intent to annex a 95 acre piece of property currently owned by Edward Minch and under contract to purchase by IDI. The proposed property is located on the west border of the North Creek subdivision, south of County Road 36, north of County Road 34 and east of County Road 5 (See attached legal description). IDI and Mr. Minch would like to propose the start of annexation proceedings for this property. We would like to begin the process in the spring of 2007. The current land use for the area according the Land Use Plan of Mead is Low Density Residential. It is our proposal to change this land use to Medium Low Density Residential upon or before annexation. We would like to have 180 single family units approved for this parcel. On April 24, 2006, IDI appeared before the Board of Trustees and presented a concept plan outlining our ideas and intent for the area. The residential neighborhood consists of one-quarter, one-third, one-half, and two-third acre lots. The master plan includes a series of parks, trails and recreational areas throughout the community. The plan was well received and encouraged at that time. IDI specializes in custom home neighborhoods with a dedication to amenities, parks and recreation for it residents. The Town of Mead and the Highland Lake area will provide the atmosphere desired of country living and a healthy life-style. The decision of County Road 5.5 will affect the design and lay-out of the property. We have included concept plans with and without the proposed county road. IDI is excited to introduce a premiere healthy-living community to Mead. We believe our design will add to the beauty and feel of the Town of Mead. g Barn Intermountain Development and Investments, LLC EDWARD MINCH ANNEXATION PETITION FOR ANNEXATION TO: THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF MEAD, COLORADO: I, Edward Minch, the undersigned landowner, in accordance with Colorado law, hereby petition the Town of Mead and its Board of Trustees for annexation to the Town of Mead of the following described unincorporated territory located in the County of Weld and State of Colorado, to-wit: SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT As part of this petition, your petitioner further states to the Board of Trustees of Mead, Colorado, that: 1. It is desirable and necessary that the territory described above be annexed to the Town of Mead. 2. The requirements of C.R.S. sections 31-12-104 and 31-12-105, as amended, exist or have been met in that: a. Not less than one-sixth of the perimeter of the area proposed to be annexed is contiguous with the Town of Mead or will be contiguous with the Town of Mead within such time as required by 31-12-104. b. A community of interest exists between the area proposed to be annexed and the Town of Mead. c. The area proposed to be annexed is urban or will be urbanized in the near future. d. The area proposed to be annexed is integrated with or is capable of being integrated with the Town of Mead. e. No land within the boundary of the territory proposed to be annexed which is held in identical ownership, whether consisting of one tract or parcel of real estate or two or more contiguous tracts or parcels of real estate, has been divided into separate parts or parcels without the written consent of the landowner or landowners thereof, unless such tracts or parcels were separated by a dedicated street, road or other public way. f. No land within the boundary of the area proposed to be annexed which is held in identical ownership, comprises twenty acres or more, and which, together with the buildings and improvements situated thereon has an assessed value in excess of two hundred thousand dollars ($200,000.00)for ad valorem tax purposes for the year next preceding the annexation, has been included within the area proposed to be annexed without the written consent of the landowner or landowners. g. No annexation proceedings have been commenced for any portion of the territory proposed to be annexed for the annexation of such territory to another municipality. h. The annexation of the territory proposed to be annexed will not result in the detachment of area from any school district. i. The annexation of the territory proposed to be annexed will not have the effect of extending the boundary of the Town of Mead more than three miles in any direction from any point of the boundary of the Town of Mead in any one year. j. Prior to completion of the annexation of the territory proposed to be annexed, the Town of Mead will have in place a plan for that area, which generally describes the proposed: Location, character, and extent of streets, subways, bridges, waterways, waterfronts, parkways, playgrounds, squares, parks, aviation fields, other public ways, grounds, open spaces, public utilities, and terminals for water, light, sanitation, transportation, and power to be provided by the Town of Mead; and the proposed land uses for the area; such plan to be updated at least once annually. k. In establishing the boundary of the territory proposed to be annexed, if a portion of a platted street or alley is to be annexed, the entire width of the street or alley has been included within the territory to be annexed. The Town of Mead will not deny reasonable access to any landowners, owners of any easement, or the owners of any franchise adjoining any platted street or alley which is to be annexed to the Town of Mead but is not bounded on both sides by the Town of Mead. 3. The owners of more than fifty percent of the area proposed to be annexed, exclusive of dedicated streets and alleys, have signed this petition and hereby petition for annexation of such territory. 4. Accompanying this petition are four copies of an annexation map containing the information following: a. A written legal description of the boundaries of the area proposed to be annexed; b. A map showing the boundary or the area proposed to be annexed, said map prepared and containing the seal of a registered engineer; c. Within the annexation boundary map, a showing of the location of each ownership tract in unplatted land and, if part or all of the area is platted, the boundaries and the plat numbers of plots or of lots and blocks; d. Next to the boundary of the area proposed to be annexed, a drawing of the contiguous boundary of the Town of Mead and the contiguous boundary of any other municipality abutting the area proposed to be annexed, and a showing of the dimensions of such contiguous boundaries. 5. Upon the Annexation Ordinance becoming effective, all lands within the area proposed to be annexed will become subject to all ordinances, rules and regulations of the Town of Mead, except for general property taxes of the Town of Mead which shall become effective as the January 1 next ensuing. 6. The zoning classification(land use) requested for the area proposed to be annexed is in Performance District 1. WHEREFORE, the following petitioner respectfully requests that the Town of Mead, acting through its Board of Trustees, approve the annexation of the area proposed to be annexed. By this acknowledgment, the undersigned hereby certify that the above information is complete and true. (If the applicant is not the owner(s)of the subject property,the owner(s), mortgage and/or lienholder shall also sign the Application.) Owner. EZ44.,.j Date: Z - r - a Y Owner: Date: Applicant: Date: 25-07-- STATE OF COLORADO ) COUNTY OF W Q. Id SS. The;�oreeoyoing instrument was acknowledge�dd before rpke this 6 day of hrUCi.P A-- 2001_by t-dwa,r A A:hr.G, 441,4 St, r:n 6.4.,A ar-MyW i commission expires: ci 3 -Z4l 2uv� Witness My hand and official seal. N ry Public •SpRY PG®�� ROBERT RYAN ? u+:, SWORD i• .. • OF CON- ,— ,-, Landowner/Petitioner Date Signed Legal Description Mailing Address of Land Owned a w�.,.r-d Al(NA Pt gOK 2 Paa(,6D LEGAL DESCRIPTION EDWARD MINCH PROPERTY A TRACT OF LAND LOCATED IN THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 68 WEST OF THE SIXTH P.M., COUNTY OF WELD, STATE OF COLORADO, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE NORTH SECHON LINE OF SAID SECTION 9, N 89°2324"E, A DISTANCE OF 1235.00 FEET FROM THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 9, THENCE S 3°30'00" W A DISTANCE OF 30.21 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE S 3°30'00" W, A DISTANCE OF 480.42 FEET; THENCE N 89°15'20" W, A DISTANCE OF 161.00 FEET; THENCE S 3°30'00" W,A DISTANCE OF 198.00 FEET; THENCE S 12°08'00" W,A DISTANCE OF 329.15 FEET; THENCE N 89°15'20" W,A DISTANCE OF 135.00 FEET; THENCE S 12°28'00" W, A DISTANCE OF 105.28 FEET; THENCE N 89°15'47"E,A DISTANCE OF 169.50 FEET; THENCE S 00°00'00"E, A DISTANCE OF1187.00 FEET; THENCE S 33°08'30"E,A DISTANCE OF 322.25 FEET; THENCE N 89°16'06"E,A DISTANCE OF 1492.79 FEET; THENCE N 00°05'55" W, A DISTANCE OF 2548.45 FEET TO A POINT, FROM SAID POINT THE NORTH 1/4 CORNER OF SAID SECTION 9 BEARS N 00°05'55" W,A DISTANCE OF 30.13 FEET; THENCE S 89°23'24" W, A DISTANCE OF 1404.72 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. THUS DESCRIBED TRACT CONTAINS 94.252 ACRES MORE OR LESS, TOGETHER WITH AND SUBJECT TO ALL EASEMENT AND RIGHT-OF-WAY EXISTING AND/OR OF PUBLIC RECORD. a LandAmerica COMMITMENT NO.: CWLM0001150 C-3 PROPERTY: TBD ^. CO 916 17th Avenue Longmont, CO 80501 SELLER: Edward L. Minch BUYER: Reddline Services, Inc., a Utah PHONE: 303-772-9164 corporation FAX: 303-772-9197 ESCROW CLOSER: Jennifer Engelking DATE: February 23, 2007 jengelking@landam.com We appreciate the opportunity to be of service to you. Please contact the above if you have any questions concerning this transaction. Please send loan documents to: COLongmont@landam.com Reddline Services, Inc. Attn: Sterling Barnes 1404 W. State Rd. Ste. 6 E-mail: sterling@myutahland.com Pleasant Grove, UT 84062 Edward L Minch P.O. Box 253 Mead, CO 80542 Century 21 Mackenzie Gold Phone: 303-995-4101 Attn: Carol Davis Fax: 970-535-4362 3314 WCR 36 E-mail: c21cdavis@aol.com Mead, CO 80542 TBD IN LandAmerica WIRE TRANSFER INSTRUCTIONS: Beneficiary Bank: Wells Fargo Bank (22) 420 Montgomery Street San Francisco, CA 94104 Beneficiary ABA Number: 121000248 Beneficiary Name and Address: Commonwealth Land Title Insurance Company 916 17th Avenue Longmont, Colorado 80501 Beneficiary Account Number: 9763221349 Please reference: Our File Number: CWLM0001150 Customer Name: Buyer - Reddline Services, Inc., a Utah corporation Seller- Edward L. Minch a LandAmerica PRIVACY POLICY NOTICE LandAmenca Financial Group, Inc. and its family of affiliated companies ('LandAmenca') respect the p vary of our customers' personal information. This Notice explains the ways in which we may coiled and use personal information under the LandAmenca Privacy Policy. LandAmenca provides title insurance and other real estate services through its affiliates.The three largest members of the LandAmenca family, Commonwealth Land Tide Insurance Company, Lawyers Tide Insurance Corporation, and Transnation Title Insurance Company,and their title affthates,issue title policies and hande real estate closings across the country. You may review a complete list of the LandAmenca family of affiliates covered by this Privacy Policy on our website at httollwww.landam.cann under the privacy policy link or request a copy be sent to you from the address listed below. The LandAmenca Privacy Policy applies to all LandAmenca customers, former customers and applicants. Please visit our website for an explanation of our privacy practices relating to electronic communication. What kinds of information we collect Depending on the services you use, the types of information we may collect from you,your lender,attorney,real estate broker,pubic records or from other sources include: information from forms and applications for services,such as your name,address and telephone number information about your transaction,including information about the real property you bought sold or financed such as address, cost,existing liens,easements,other title information and deeds with closing, escrow, settlement or mortgage lending services or mortgage loan servicing, we may also coded your social security number as well as information from thud parties including properly appraisals,credit reports, loan applications, land surveys,real estate tax information,escrow arrmmt balances,and sometimes bank account numbers or credit card account numbers to facilitate the transaction,and information about your transactions and experiences as a customer of ours or our affiliated companies, such as products or services purchased and payments made. How we use and disclose this Information: We use your information to provide you with the services, products and insurance that you, your lender, attorney, or real estate brokers have requested. We disclose information to our affiliates and unrelated companies as needed to carry out and service your transaction,to protect against fraud or unauthorized transactions, for institutional risk control,to provide infonnation to government and law enforcement agencies and as otherwise permitted by law. As required to facilitate a transaction,our title affiliates record documents that are part of your transaction in the public records as a legal requirement for real property notice purposes. We do not share any nonpublic personal information we collect from you with unrelated companies for their own use. We do not share any information regarding your transaction that we obtain from third parties (including credit report information) except as needed to enable your transaction as permitted by law. We may also disclose your name, address and property information to other companies who perform marketing services such as letter production and mailing on our behalf,or to other financial service companies(such as insurance commas,banks,mortgage brokers,creed companies)with whom we have joint marketing arrangements. Additionally,some LandAmenca alfilates may share information about their transaction and experiences with you in order to identify opportunities to market other LandAmenca services or products that may be useful to you. How we protect your information: We maintain administrative,physical,electronic and procedural safeguards to guard your nonpublic personal information. We reinforce ow pnvacy policy with our employees and ow contractors. Joint marketer*and third parties service providers who have access to nonpublic personal information to provide marketing or services on our behalf are required by contract to follow appropriate standards of security and confidentiality. True insurance agents may be covered by this pulley: If your transaction goes through a title insurance agent that is not part of the LandAmenca family,the agent handling your transaction should provide you with the agents own privacy policy or evidence that the agent has adopted our policy. If you have any questions about this privacy statement or our practices at LandAmenca, please email us at customerservicealandam.com or write us at LandAmenca Privacy,P.O,Box 27567,Richmond,VA 23261-7567 Effective June 2006 Commonwealth Land Title Insurance Company COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE Schedule A I. Effective Date: February 20, 2007 at 7:00 am Commitment No.: CWLM0001150 C-3 2. Policies to be issued: Amount A. ALTA Residential Owner's Policy (06-01-87) $1,140.000.00 Proposed Insured: Reddline Services, Inc., a Utah corporation B. ALTA Loan Policy (10/17/92) TO BE DETERMINED Proposed Insured: To Be Determined 3. The estate or interest in the land described or referred to in this Commitment and covered herein is Fee Simple and Title to the estate or interest in the land is vested in: Edward Minch 4. The land referred to in this Commitment Is described as follows: Lot B of Recorded Exemption No. 1207-09-2-RE1720, recorded April 19, 1995 in Book 1488 at Reception No. 2434744, being a part of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 9.Township 3 North, Range 68 West of the 6th P.M., County of Weld, State of Colorado. Premiums and Fees: $2,545.00 Owner's Policy - Basic Rate TBD Simultaneous Loan Additional Endorsements and Coverages Available Upon Request (applicable charges apply) $25.00 Tax Information Services NOTE: Based on the information provided for the application of this commitment, the premiums and fees stated herein represent the qualifying applicable filed rates and/or available dicrrbmted programs. Please contact us should you have any questions regarding any of these charges. Prepared By: Sean Stevens Commitment No. CWLM0001150 C-3 SCHEDULE B - SECTION 1 REQUIREMENTS The following are the requirements to be complied with prior to the issuance of said policy or policies. Any other instrument recorded subsequent to the date hereof may appear as an exception under Schedule B of the policy to be issued. Unless otherwise noted, all documents must be recorded in the Office of Clerk and Recorder of the county in which said property is located. NOTE: Pursuant to Senate Bill 91-14 (C.R.S. 10-11-122) the Company will not issue its policy or policies of title insurance contemplated by this commitment until it has been provided a Certificate of Taxes Due or other equivalent documentation from the County Treasurer or the County Treasurer's authorized agent; or until the proposed insured has notified or instructed the Company in writing to the contrary. NOTE: Effective September 1, 1997, C.R.S. 30-10-406 requires that all documents received for recording or filing in the Clerk and Recorder's office shall contain a top margin of at least one inch and a left, right and bottom margin of at least one-half inch. The Clerk and Recorder may refuse to record or file any document that does not conform. NOTE: If this transaction includes a sale of the property and the price exceeds $100,000.00, the seller must comply with the disclosure/withholding provisions of C.R.S. 39-22-604.5 (Non withholding). A_ Certificate of Satisfaction issued by the Clerk of the Court, of Judgment in favor of BC Services, Inc. against Edward D. Minch, et al, in the amount of$605.07 plus interest and court costs, entered on May 27, 2005 in the Case No. 05C-002832, Combined Court, County of Weld, recorded June 28, 2005 at Reception No. 3298468. NOTE Assignment of Judgement to 1670 WCR Investors, LLC recorded August 8, 2005 as Reception No. 3311134. B. Intentionally Deleted. C. Deed sufficient to convey fee simple estate or interest in the land described or referred to herein, to the proposed insured, Schedule A, Item 2A. NOTE: Section 38-35-109 (2) of the Colorado Revised Statutes, 1973, requires that a notation of the legal address of the purchaser (not necessarily the same as the property address) be included on the face of the deed to be recorded. NOTE: C.R.S.39-14-102 requires that a Real Property Transfer Declaration accompany any conveyance document presented for recordation In the State of Colorado. Said dedaration shall be completed and signed by either the grantor or grantee. D. Deed of Trust sufficient to encumber the fee simple estate or interest in the land described or referred to herein, for the benefit of the proposed insured. NOTE: Said document must be executed by the President, Vice President or other designated authority with corporate seal or facsimile affixed. E. Payment of all taxes and assessments now due and payable. Commitment No.CWLM0001150 C-3 SCHEDULE B - SECTION 2 EXCEPTIONS The Policy or Policies to be issued will contain exceptions to the following unless the same are disposed of to the satisfaction of the Company: 1. Rights or claims of parties in possession not shown by the public records. 2. Easements, or claims of easements, not shown by the public records, 3. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, encroachments and any facts which a correct survey and inspection of the premises would disclose and which are not shown by the public records. 4. Any lien or right to a lien, for services, labor or material heretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law and not shown by the public records. 5. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, if any, created, first appearing in the public records or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof but pnor to the date the proposed insured acquires of record for value the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. Note: The above exception will not appear on policies where dosing and settlement has been performed by the Company. 6. Any and all unpaid taxes and assessments. 7. Reservation of right of proprietor of any penetrating vein or lode to extract his ore, in U.S. Patent recorded March 3, 1882 in Book 20 at Page 357. 8. Right(s) of way, including its terms and conditions, whether in fee or easement only, as granted to Mountain State Telephone and Telegraph Company, as described in instrument recorded May 7, 1930 in Book 894 at Page 392. 9. Right(s) of way, including its terms and conditions, whether in fee or easement only, as granted to Platte River Power Authority, a political subdivision of the State of Colorado, as described in instrument recorded April 3, 1978 at Reception No. 1749130 affecting the following described property: as more particularly described in said instrument. 10. All notes, easements and road rights of way as shown on the Recorded Exemption No. 1207-09- 2-RE1720 recorded April 19, 1995 in Book 1488 at Reception No. 2434744. ti. Terms, agreements, provisions, conditions and obligations as contained in Agreement by and between Edward Minch and The County of Weld, a body corporate and politic of the State of Colorado recorded April 6, 1999 at Reception No. 2685275. 12. Right(s) of way, including its terms and conditions, whether in fee or Payment only, as granted to The County of Weld, a political subdivision of the State of Colorado, as described in instrument recorded April 6, 1999 at Reception No. 2685276 affecting the following described property: as more particularly described in said instrument. Commitment No. CWLM0001150 C-3 13. Right(s) of way, including its terms and conditions, whether in fee or easement only, as granted to Town of Mead, Colorado, as described in instrument recorded May 18, 2001 at Reception No. 2849694. 14. Terms, agreements, provisions, conditions and obligations as contained in Ordinance No. 299 recorded September 7, 2001 at Reception No. 2882188. 15. Matters of survey as shown on Land Survey Plat recorded January 22, 2002 at Reception No. 2918779, NOTE: Pursuant to C.R.S. 10-11-122 notice is hereby given that: (A) The subject property may be located in a special taxing district; (B) A certificate of taxes due listing each taxing jurisdiction may be obtained from the County Treasurer or the County Treasurer's authorized agent; (C) INFORMATION regarding special districts and the boundaries of such districts may be obtained from the Board of County Commissioners, the County Clerk and Recorder, or the County Assessor. NOTE: If Schedule B of your commitment for an owner's title policy reflects an exception for mineral interest or leases, pursuant to C.R.S. 10-11-123 (HB 01-1088), this is to advise: (A) That there is recorded evidence that a mineral estate has been severed, leased, or otherwise conveyed from the surface estate and that there Is a substantial likelihood that a third party holds some or all interest in oil, gas, other minerals, or geothermal energy in the property; and (B) That such mineral estate may include the right to enter and use the property without the surface owner's permission. NOTE: The policy(s) of insurance may contain a clause permitting arbitration of daims at the request of either the Insured or the Company. Upon request, the Company will provide a copy of this clause and the accompanying arbitration rules prior to the closing of the transaction. NOTE: This commitment is for the 1992 version of the ALTA form title insurance policy. The 2006 version of that ALTA policy form is now available upon request. There is no difference in the premium. There are no differences in the underwriting requirements to be satisfied. Please ask about significant changes that benefit the Insured provided by the new policy forms. Issued by Commonwealth Land Title Insurance Company COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE LandAmerica Commonwealth Commormealth Land Title Insurance Company,a Nebraska corporation,herein called the Company,for a valuable consideration,hereby commits to issue its policy or policies of title utsurance,as identified in Schedule A,in favor of the proposed Insured named in Schedule A,as owner or mortgagee of the estate or interest covered hereby in the land described or referred to to Schedule A,upon payment of the premiums and charges therefor,all suiject to the provisions of Schedules A and B and to the Conditions and Stipulations hereof. This Commitment shall be effective only when the identity of the proposed Insured and the amount of the policy or policies committed for have been inserted in Schedule A hereof by the Company,either at the ome of the issuance of this Commitment or by subsequent endorsement This Commitment is preliminary to the Issuance of such policy or policies of title insurance and all liability and obligations hereunder shalt cease and terminate six(6)months alter the effective date hereof or when the policy or policies committed for shall be issued,whichever first occurs,provided that the failure to issue such policy or policies is not the fault of the Company. This Commitment shall not be valid or binding until countersigned by an authorized officer or agenL IN WITNESS WHEREOF,Conimomvealth Land Title Insurance Company has caused us corporate name and seal to be hereunto affixed by its duly authorized officers,this Commitment to become valid when cotntersigncd by an authorized offieer or agent of the Company. Commonwealth Land Title Insurance Company AttBSt: 7") Bv: ��...t � �� (� I SEAL ifI President Secretary t CONDITIONS I. The term mortgage,when used herein,shall include deed of trust,trust deed,or other secunty instrument 2. If the proposed insured has or acquired actual knowledge of any defect,ben,encumbrance,adverse claim or other matter affecting the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment other than those shown m Schedule B hereof,and shall fail to disclose such knowledge to the Company in writing,the Company shall be relieved from liability for any loss or damage resultmg from any act of reliance hereon to the extent the Company is prejudiced by failure to so disclose such knowledge. If the proposed bisrwsd shall disclose such€mowledge to the Company,or if the Company otherwise acquires actual knowledge of any such defect,hen,encumbrance,adverse claim or other matter,the Company at its option may amend Schedule B of this Commitment accordingly,but such amendment shall not relieve the Company from liability previously incurred pursuant to paragraph 3 of these Conditions and Stipulations. 3. Liability of the Company under this Commitment shall be only to the named proposed Insured and such parties included under the definition of Insured in the form of policy or po€ic►es corramiled for and only for actual loss incurred in reliance hereon in undertaking in good faith(a)to comply with the requirements hereof,or(b)to eliminate exceptions shown in Schedule B,or(c)to acquire or create the estate or interest or mortgage then on covered by this Commitment. €n no event shall such liability exceed the amount staled in Schedule A for the policy or policies committed for and such liability is subject to the insuring provisions and Conditions and Stipulations and the Exclusions from Coverage of the form of policy or policies committed for in favor of the proposed Insured which are hereby incorporated by reference and are made a Ft of this Commitment except as expressly modified herein. 4. Any action or actions or rights of action that the proposed insured may have or may bring against the Company arising out of the status of the title to the estate or interest or the status of the mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment must be based on and are subject to the provisions of this Commitment_ ALTA Commitment 1966 (Revised 7/1/06) Commonwealth Land Title Insurance Company NOTICE TO PROSPECTIVE INSURED OWNER: Re: Mechanic's Lien and Gap Protection This is to advise that Commonwealth Land Title Insurance Company makes available to its prospective insured owners, in conjunction with their Commonwealth Land Title Insurance Company policy covering a single family residence, including a condominium or townhouse unit, protection against mechanic's liens. This protection is not automatic nor given in all cases, but is subject to the Company's Underwriting requirements, and does not cover those liens which arise out of work contracted for or entered into at the request of the insured owner. These underwriting requirements include, but may not be limited to, the following: 1. Receipt by the Company of agreement(s) indemnifying it for any loss resulting from its granting of lien protection, executed by the seller, contractor or others who might have incurred debts which could result in mechanic's liens; 2. Information concerning the solvency and whereabouts of the parties set forth in Item No. 1, possibly including financial statements; 3. Evidence of payment of any bills which might have been incurred for work done on the property, depending upon the length of time elapsed since the last work was completed and what remains to be done; 4. In the event of extensive recent construction, whether on all of the improvements upon the property or not, additional items required may include: (a) the Company's review of the owner's and/or builder's history relative to construction projects previously completed or presently under construction; (b) review of the construction loan agreement, if applicable; (c) review of any performance or materialmen's bonds concerning this construction, if applicable; (d) payment of the appropriate charge for mechanic's lien protection during construction, if applicable. This is also to advise that, pursuant to Regulation of the Colorado Insurance Commissioner, every title entity shall be responsible for all matters which appear of record prior to the time of recording, and subsequent to the effective date of the commitment, whenever the title entity conducts the closing and is responsible for recording or filing of legal documents resulting from the transaction which was closed. This does not include those matters created, suffered, assumed or agreed to by the insured. The prospective insured is advised to inquire of the closing entity as to whether it is an office of Commonwealth Land Title Insurance Company, or is an independent agent which will be the responsible entity relative to the closing only. Property Owners Within 300 ft. of Parcel# 120709000054 PARCEL NAME MAILING ADDRESS IDENTIFICATION # 717 W FIFTH AVE 1670 WCR INVESTORS LLC 120709000053 LONGMONT,CO 80501 16763 WESTVIEW DR BIESTERFELD MARTHA J& 120709109008 MEAD,CO 80542 16783 WESTVIEW DR BLACKBURN SANDER A & LINDA S 120709110001 MEAD,CO 80542 2559 SERENA DR BRANDON BOBBI JO & FRED 120709101002 MEAD,CO 80542 16668 COUNTY RD 5 BROOKS BRYAN S & YAVETTE S 120709000015 MEAD,CO 80542 16873 WESTVIEW DR BROWN MICHAEL E & 120709110005 MEAD,CO 80.542 CHAPMAN ROBERT W& 16755 WESTVIEW DR CATHERINE J 120709109007 MEAD,CO 80542 16543 WESTVIEW DR COCHRAN KEITH A & 120709109002 MEAD,CO 80542 16758 WESTVIEW DR ELSHIRE ROBERT D & LISA R 120709104003 MEAD,CO 80542 16778 WEST VIEW DR GUZMAN EDWARD RICHARD & 120709102001 MEAD,CO 80542 2544 MEADOW LANE HEDGECOCK HOYT JR&EVELYN M 120709106001 MEAD,CO 80542 C/O LAWRENCE M JENSEN CPA HIGHLANDLAKE CHURCH INC 717 W FIFTH AVE 120709000007 LONGMONT,CO 80501 17029 WELD CO RD 5 HIGHLANDLAKE PROPERTIES LLLP 120709000002 MEAD,CO 80504 2063 WELD CO RD 34 1/2 HOCKADAY KELLY D &BRENDA M 120709000017 MEAD,CO 80542 HOLLAND PHILIP DANIEL P O BOX 596 120709000051 file://C:\Documents and Settings\Carol Davis\My Documents Winch Field\300 ft from Mi... 2/5/2007 MEAD,CO 80542 P O BOX 596 HOLLAND PHILIP DANIEL 120709000052 MEAD,CO 80542 16789 WEST VIEW DR JONES LONNIE C 120709110002 MEAD,CO 80542 KRISHER GREGORY S & LORETTA P O BOX 487 ANN 120709109001 MEAD,CO 80542 2544 SERENA DR LANDWEHR CHERYL ANN 120709102003 MEAD,CO 80542 2545 SERENA DR LEICK TAMMY L 120709101001 MEAD,CO 80542 LITZENBERGER LEONARD & MARY 16084 COUNTY ROAD 5 ELLEN 120709300026 MEAD,CO 80542 16924 COUNTY RD 5 MAGAZINER BLAIR L & RUTHE E 120709000018 MEAD,CO 80542 16930 COUNTY RD 5 MCLEAN JOHNA L& 120709000005 MEAD,CO 80542 441 THIRD ST MEAD TOWN OF 120709421238 MEAD,CO 80542 P O BOX 217 MEAD TOWN OF 120709110051 MEAD,CO 80542 PO BOX 217 MEAD TOWN OF 120709111052 MEAD,CO 80542 PO BOX 253 MINCH EDWARD 120704000013 MEAD,CO 80542 2403 COUNTY RD 36 MINCH JOHN& • 120704400048 MEAD,CO 80542 16685 WESTVIEW DR MRAZ JASON E & 120709109005 MEAD,CO 80542 16881 WEST VIEW DR OVERHOLSER R DUANE 120709110006 MEAD,CO 80542-9778 2558 SERENA DR OWEN THOMAS R&NORMA J 120709102004 MEAD,CO 80542 file://C:\Documents and Settings\Carol Davis\My Documents\Minch Field\300 ft from Mi... 2/5/2007 2545 JARETT DR PALS WILLIAM D & 120709106024 -- MEAD,CO 80542 PO BOX 756 RANDALL CAROL E& GLORIA J 120709109009 MEAD,CO 80542 16786 WESTVIEW DR RAYHILL BARRY E& LAURIE A 120709102002 MEAD,CO 80542 2544 JARETT DR RISEDORF GREGORY A & KELLY A 120709107001 MEAD,CO 80542 2059 COUNTY RD 36 SALMEN JEFFERY D & 120704000038 MEAD,CO 80542 16797 WEST VIEW DR SCHAAF RANDY C & 120709110003 MEAD,CO 80542 PO BOX 612 SEGO DAVID L &TAMARA L & 120709104001 MEAD,CO 80542 SENESAC STEPHEN JOHN & SHERYL 2025 WELD CO RD 36 LYNN 120704000010 MEAD,CO 80542 2558 MEADOW LN SLIGER CHRISTOPHER P & SALLY D 120709106002 MEAD,CO 80542 16778 WCR 5 SMITH JEFF L SR& PAULI A 120709000008 MEAD,CO 80542 17008 COUNTY RD 5 SPAHN NANCY JO 120704000039 MEAD,CO 80542 PO BOX 161 SPELLMAN GARY 120709109003 MEAD,CO 80542 16920 WELD CO RD 5 SPROUSE JANE E 120709000006 MEAD,CO 80542 PO BOX 547 STAHL KRISTINE MARY& 120709106023 MEAD,CO 80542 2558 JARETT DR STOWERS BRADLEY D& 120709107002 MEAD,CO 80542 16697 WESTVIEW DR STRUTT DALE D& MARY E 120709109006 MEAD,CO 80542 16671 WESTVIEW DR file://C:\Documents and Settings\Carol Davis\My Documents\Minch Field\300 ft from Mi... 2/5/2007 THOMAS CATHY L MEAD,CO 80542 120709109004 2061 WELD CO RD 34.5 TOMKY MICHAEL L & 120709000016 MEAD,CO 80542 2099 COUNTY RD 36 TUTTLE RODNEY W 120704000012 MEAD,CO 80542 P O BOX 295 VONALT FAMILY TRUST& 120709100011 MEAD,CO 80542-0295 WHITEAKER THEODORE R& 16869 WESTVIEW DR GENEVIEVE M 120709110004 MEAD,CO 80542 file://C:\Documents and Settings\Carol Davis\My Documents\Minch Field\300 ft from Mi... 2/5/2007 To be Completed TOWN OF MEAD -- by Surveyor m Annexation Map Engbeer. Land Surveying Standards Name of Annexation: `'_`:;1.--?P•RD IVYeNeu Vac;Jcr,-1 Surveyor CLC'- —,—RA-‘E, Date Initials Items ti/3, `•r�r Ica to 1. A scale drawing of the boundaries of the land parcel. 2. All recorded and apparent right-of-way and easements.and,if research for recorded rights-of-way and f3n- ter easements is done by someone other than the professional land surveyor who prepares tee plat,be source 1, from which such recorded rights-of-way and easements were obtained. 1 3. AY dimensions necessary to establish the boundaries in the field.(The dimensions must be shown to all a./ control monuments used to the fold survey.If the boundary runs down a line or parallels a Ihe,the dimensions `0(o )1-4, to get from the control line or monuments to the parcel must be shown.Dimensions to both ends of the control line must be shown.) 4. A statement by be professional land surveyor that the survey was performed by such surveyor or under such surveyor's responsible charge. • • �� 5. A statement by the professional land surveyor expiating how bearings,if used,were detemined t I 6. A description of all monuments,both found and set which mark the boundaries of the property and of all ,>s, control monument used in conducting the survey.(Monument such as section corners are control r�b -7 -' monuments.If you are running down a the or paallelkhg a Inc.the monuments at both ends of the the must be shown.It must be labeled on the map or plat if a monument Is found or set) 30,E l i - 7. A statement of the scale or representative fraction of the drawing,and a bar-type or graphical scale t1f441: 8. Anorth avow. tar/ 9. A written property description,which shat include but shat not be limited b a reference b the county and 30 state together with the section,township,range,and principal meridian or establshed subdtvtion,bock and in Co (6'- lot number,or any other method of describing the land as establshed by tie general land once or bureau of and management(Property description Is to be written In upper case type.) tl f g cyott, 10. My conflicting boundary evidence.Ties to and descriptions of all conflicting corners are shown. it/b�� 11. Location map.Minimum one and one-oaf mile radius of the property with principal roads labeled. t 1 f 12. Certificate block- maps. ��'a,;,_ ,L., based on the Town's standard cartncatea for annexation *, 13. The signature and seal of the professional land surveyor.Initial of draftsperson,date ofdrawing and AutoCAD fie name. 11/3 ! 0 < 14. All calculations have been double checked on final map for any errors,transpositions,the sum of the parts (04, X,,.-' equals the total length,etc. i 3re 15. Corner recordation have been made,or what Is found h the field is identical with a previously filed corner r,•pe„ iF-,t recortlatlan.Corner recordalona have to be Sled on allsections,'/.section end aliquot corners of a section. 11/ 18. Dimensions of lots and area of the lot are to be placed Inside the lot dimensions of bbcks or parameters a a , . of polygons are to be pissed outside to block or polygon.Widths of roads,end easement are to be laced A19C? AZ�, between the r.o.w.tiles when possible.Dimensions must clearly indicate to terminus point at each end. Curve data may be presented h tabular form,or with leader etmension lines. ll f3_deb •1, / 17. All text and numbers are to be large enough to clearly legble at the scale drawn.Paragraph text legal Y descriptions and certificates are to be In 12 pt(0.186081)AutoCAD Roman Simplex,Heketica,Aril or similar'van serf type.Tub of plat is to be ceMeretl at top of the plat in type not less than.3'hgh. 'I f3Q 18. An AutecAD",drawing file(Release 12 or higher)of the map,and al fontfles used,on 3 W BM 11M t�TO �. formatted disk t b be provided.A wind processing file of the legal description on 3 W IBM formatted disk t to be provided(Word Perfect6.1 preferred). INSTRUCTIONS 1. This checkist Is required b be completed by the responsible surveyor or engineer end submitted with the annexation map. 2. The completed check 1st is to be maintained In the Applicant's File. 3. Items#1 trough 10 refer to C.R.S.38-51-108,Surveying sautes. Official Use Only Reviewed by: Date: enn.vuon Map Land Surveying Sana,da Cl,ntm..ryd 10/5/00 Nate vin Page 1 of 1 T1-AC ,'-s IAA- Sv13M 1TTAL 1S A ee .ovE THE. l";';,_r.t: At-)r-k Ss- .SSt,, V..A ? kJ. b'vl t,.. Tt-IE 51611^-'Lyre—C Fy '(" Y3. =" gaep 5 1 g b Tall V a. hp 1 9 a5 a " 12 &"A �i4R s' I3a °"1S b r 3 33 t ale 'b°g:x = b133 g1Y3 g9 1 a 33 �. a 9 i I s s i� �e�@ 3€ aG C= �89�& Bs a z 2iii d 3 I m �A 1 s _ 3 �4 :ggt,a-.p.!- t 11 I 5141 a € ba s EV gb ;gi'1=BEa'se?e $ 7 O g it . tgg1 Y. €'fr�1e•3' -g1q. a v 9 @$ "qa₹ o 1 { o it f 5' $ 8 :€ i'� RB €g Ay'§ y b y O.$,§ �, i ;-$8X8 ; °—J 1 A b"b $ F E3 5 tt' n a�byby's0a$�tltl$8 v S 4 E in as 2 s A ,,b v €_ d 3'§g o£b H I $863A"5g,y₹b. C tlb b { ¢ b °u Yy % o "s_� § 1.1 a A°3. g3 1 ! Ya ! 1 1 11 i x gg G o !� 58 b 'h,i bi bibi mg b e gg gi d gr 4 li:p'A l:tY�'!s,7 sac u i Ri € s .!=§I I; a t ! 5pu 4° 5 d tax \, t{" g@ o ' ri ' ti q gX off: w �.. f ' a $� YS l -✓ f.f� i y6 `#`FF yse F R% "._ N a F'l S -@ Y 1 4 .a 9₹y9 WiE� - - q .i 0s $Ep 3A3F ozu aMo - s z w _ �3 JO k _ / O. 0 0 _— a -,s.-a.3z .ss.3ZSo. y yy c4 .=<-, i f11 $Fom U d3 e^ E 9 i u .P_ <m 8 5 r. ill _" 21 5 i c orr qi �I p a nF q b ,I 3A o Ufa 3p ti y ¢ i'g _I » r =a 3'A 5 bkb tn I .! ;� $ Tnn ‘-----.� iY'OBt Op OC.CS .. ^- pl nl i3 t1 --e ;16 II0 x: . 03 x ga I M .SI'YZ[ - „�_—nl�,�. I 4alL •00,80;1 S .00'CBII 1.000OF05 ' VA' WV ddNl10J 09-3-4L - IS :III ic 12 ➢I fi ��- 12. NCWCD Petition After contacting the NCWCD and speaking with Marilyn we have confirmed that the Minch property is already in the district and does not need to petition to become part of the district. This petition has been excluded from the application for this reason. SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED NON-TRIBUTARY AND NOT NON-TRIBUTARY GROUNDWATER THIS DEED, made this day of , between Edward Minch, 17072 County Road 5,Mead, CO 80542 of the County of Weld, State of Colorado, grantor(s) and the Town of Mead, P.O. Box 626,Mead,CO 80542,of the County of Weld, State of Colorado: WITNESSETH,that the grantor(s),for and in consideration of the sum of Ten dollars and other good and valuable consideration,the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, ha granted, bargained, sold and conveyed,and by these presents do_grant,bargain, sell,convey, and confirm, unto the grantee and its successors and assigns forever,all the real property,together with improvements, if any, situate, lying and being in the SEE EXHIBIT A(ATTACHED)County of Weld, State of Colorado,described as follows: All non-tributary and not non-tributary groundwater as defined by C.R.S. § 37-90-103,whether adjudicated,unadjudicated,permitted or unpermitted, underlying the property described in Exhibit A,attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein. also known by street and number as: assessor's schedule or parcel number: TOGETHER with all and singular the hereditaments and appurtenances thereto belonging, or in anywise appertaining,and the reversion and reversions,remainder and remainders,rents, issues and profits thereof; and all the estate,right,title, interest,claim and demand whatsoever of the grantor(s), either in law or equity,of, in and to the above bargained water rights,with the hereditaments and appurtenances; TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the said water rights above bargained and described with the appurtenances,unto the grantee and its successors and assigns forever.The grantor(s),for_sel heirs and personal representatives or successors,do covenant and agree that shall and will WARRANT AND FOREVER DEFEND the above-bargained water rights in the quiet and peaceable possession of the grantee,and its successors and assigns,against all and-every person or persons claiming the whole or any part thereof,by,through or under the grantor(s). IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the grantor(s)ha_executed this deed on the date set forth above. Date 4 - .5 - /1 7 Signature Trial. _,( Date 1'6'67" Signature STATE OF COLORADO ) SS. COUNTY OF i,(),(cI ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 53/4 day of Fehr Laty ,20 by R-G.✓arcl Mt not, a ,/ 54e/;hr 84,-., I My commission expires: 03- Zed g Witness My hand and official seal. Notary]'ffblic air ppY PU®�ie'14 i ' ROBERT tit RYAN i ft N/; SWORD ®o, LEGAL DESCRIPTION EDWARD MINCH PROPERTY A TRACT OF LAND LOCATED IN THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 68 WEST OF THE SIXTH P.M, COUNTY OF WELD, STATE OF COLORADO, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE NORTH SECTION LINE OF SAID SECTION 9, N 89°23 24"E,A DISTANCE OF 1235.00 FEET FROM THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 9, THENCE S 3°30'00" W, A DISTANCE OF 30.21 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE S 3°30'00" W, A DISTANCE OF 480.42 FEET THENCE N 89°15'20" W, A DISTANCE OF 161.00 FEET; THENCE S 3°30'00" W, A DISTANCE OF 198.00 FEET; THENCE S 12°08'00" W, A DISTANCE OF 329.15 FEET; THENCE N 89°15'20" W, A DISTANCE OF 135.00 FEET; THENCE S 12°28'00" W A DISTANCE OF 105.28 FEET; THENCE N 89°15'47"E,A DISTANCE OF 169.50 FEET; THENCE S 00°00'00"E, A DISTANCE OF1187.00 FEET; THENCE S 33°08'30"E,A DISTANCE OF 322.25 FEET; THENCE N 89°16'06"E, A DISTANCE OF 1492.79 FEET; THENCE N 00°05'55" W, A DISTANCE OF 2548.45 FEET TO A POINT, FROM SAID POINT THE NORTH 1/4 CORNER OF SAID SECTION 9 BEARS N 00°05'55" W,A DISTANCE OF 30.13 FEET; THENCE S 89°23 24" W A DISTANCE OF 1404.72 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. THUS DESCRIBED TRACT CONTAINS 94.252 ACRES MORE OR LESS, TOGETHER WITH AND SUBJECT TO ALL EASEMENT AND RIGHT-OF-WAY EXISTING AND/OR OF PUBLIC RECORD. February 5, 2007 Michael D. Friesen, Town Manager 441 Third Street P.O. Box 626 Mead, CO 80542 RE: Edward Minch Annexation Annexation Impact Report Intermountain Dev. & Inv.,LLC Dear Mr. Friesen: Edward Minch jointly with Intermountain Development& Investments, LLC is requesting annexation into the Town of Mead, proposing a single family home development. The area is located between WCR 34.5 and WCR 36, and between WCR 5 and the North Creek Subdivision. The proposed 95.5 acre development consists of residential land uses with single family lots ranging from .25 acres to .66 acres in size. In preparation for the annexation process, this report analyzes the proposed development's impact with respect to the Town of Mead's and St. Vrain Valley School District services. Sincerely, Sterling Barnes Intermountain Development& Investments, LLC Attachments: General Site Location and Description The Edward Minch Property site is located between WCR 34.5 and WCR 36 (South to North) and between WCR 5 and the North Creek Subdivision(West to East). The property is roughly 95.5 acres and is currently used for agricultural uses. Plans for Extension of Municipal Services Water At this time, the Minch Property is located within the service district of the Little Thompson Water District(LTWD). It is the applicant's intention to have the proposed development on the site served by LTWD. The applicant is in discussions with the water district concerning the project and will be obtaining an agreement to serve the site prior to final approval of the annexation. There is an 8-inch waterline that services the North Creek Subdivision, which borders the site on the southeast corner. There is also an 8-inch water line in County Road 7, which is approximately 0.5 miles east of the site. The 8-inch water line servicing the North Creek Subdivision would need to be extended approximately 100 feet in County Road 34.5 to service the property. The 8-inch water line would need to be continued through the Minch property to County Road 36. Based on experience in the area, Mike Cook at LTWD believes that the existing 8-inch waterlines will provide sufficient service for the site. If water demand exceeds the capacity of the existing 8-inch waterlines, service would need to be extended south from County Road 38 to the site. This would require 1.5 miles of waterline, a master meter, and a pressure reducing valve. There is a great opportunity for the Minch Property to have a non-potable water system for lot and open space irrigation. There are 80 shares of Highland Lake water for the site. The best alternative for an on-site irrigation system would be to place a pump station which can draw water directly from Highland Lake. If that is not possible, a small lake would be needed on-site. Sanitary Sewer There are two possibilities for sanitary sewer service for the Minch Property: connection to the lift station in North Creek subdivision or connection to the gravity sewer in Western Meadows subdivision. Preliminary sizing information from JR Engineering indicates that either option is feasible with regards to capacity. If gravity flow to the North Creek subdivision is possible, and the undeveloped topography indicates that it is,then connection to the lift station would require the least amount of off-site improvements. There is an 8-inch gravity sewer line throughout the North Creek subdivision including a line in West View Drive, which is the westernmost street in the subdivision. In addition,there is a 10-inch gravity line stubbed to the western edge of the Western Meadows site approximately 1,100 feet south of County Road 34.5. Natural Gas Natural gas will be provided by Xcel Energy. The applicant is currently in contact with Xcel Energy. Electric Electric service will be provided by United Power. The applicant has contacted United Power and a "will serve" letter may not be issued until the project is further in the design process. Application materials have been obtained and an onsite meeting is scheduled after annexation has been completed. Telephone Qwest will be the communications service provider. The applicant is currently in contact with Qwest. Streets Site access should not be a concern for the Minch property. The site is bounded on the north by County Road 36 and on the south by County Road 34.5. In addition, a small section of the property is bounded by County Road 5 to the west. Access to the site is possible from all three existing roads. County Road 34.5 is currently a two-lane paved road. It is possible that turn lanes will be required for access to the site depending on the traffic study recommendations. County Road 36 will need to be improved where it touches the North boundary of the Minch Property. County Road 5.5 is a future arterial that may affect the Edward Minch Annexation Property. The road is a result of a 2003 study regarding parallel reliever arterials. Upon final decision of road alignment,the Minch property will understand its direct affects. If built, County Road 5.5 would likely be a 4-lane arterial with a design speed of 55 mph(posted at 40 or 45 mph). The Minch Property would need to dedicate the full 100-foot right-of-way needed for the ultimate section, but would be required only to build the 2-lane interim section. Final concept plans for the lay- out of the Minch property will be determined by the alignment of County Road 5.5. Law Enforcement The proposed property would be provided law enforcement services under the Town's current contract with the Weld County Sheriff's Department. The applicant is currently in contact with the Weld County Sheriff's Office. Fire The proposed property is within the Mountain View Fire Protection District. The applicant is in contact with the district about service to this property. Existing School District and Special Districts The site is located within the following school and special districts: St. Vrain Valley School District Little Thompson Water District Mountain View Fire Protection District Northern Colorado Water Conservancy District Longmont Soil Conservation District St. Vrain Left Hand Water Conservancy District Weld Library District Local Public School Impact The proposed development will generate approximately 118 students. This is based on a student yield of.66 for single-family detached units. The Minch property will have 180 single-family detached units. The yield is itemized as follows: • 58 elementary students or 11% of the standard capacity of a 525-student elementary school. • 31 middle level students or 4%of the standard capacity of a 750-student middle school. • 29 high school students or 2%of the standard capacity of a 1200-student high school. Edward Minch Annexation County Road 36 it k I I t 6 County Road 34 1/2 1 SITE TABLE Area: ACRES 1/3 Acre Lets 7.37 © + 1/2 Acre Lots 22.66 4O 1/3 Acre Lots 12.71 1/4 Acre Lots 23.13 Northern t Open Space 16.4 G Local Road y Recreation Trail Bubble Diagram Only-Actual road alignments and acreages TBD Approximately 180 Single Family Dwelling Units 1. Preliminary Groundwater Levels and Soils Groundwater: In addition to the report prepared by Soilogic, Inc,we have done some preliminary soils investigation. A general summary of the water levels of the site are contained in the Soilogic report. Current ground water levels in the southern and northeastern portions of the site may impact the feasibility of full basement construction. TST Engineering is designing an underdrain system to bring the water level down to allow for basements in the homes. Current water levels range from 4.4 to 13.8 feet below ground surface. Soilogic assumes that these water levels will go down as farming irrigation tapers off. Soils: The subsurface materials found in drilling locations consisted mostly of low to moderate plasticity clay. It is assumed that there is some weathered siltstone with interbedded sandstone bedrock. The bedrock is assumed to be at depths of 13 feet and below. Soft soils have been encountered near current groundwater levels in a portion of the site. Backfill procedures or alternative deep foundation systems could be considered to secure these sites. Continuing evaluations of water levels and soils will contribute to the final design of underdrain system and fill levels. Because the property topography is fairly flat, soil strengths and compaction is a point of consideration but not a major concern at this point. • April 14, 2006 My Utah Land Company 1404 West State Street, Suite 6 Pleasant Grove, Utah 84062 Attn: Mr. Brett Redd Re: Monitoring Well Installation Highland Lake Property Mead, Colorado Soilogic Project # 06-1007 Mr. Redd: As requested, Soilogic, Inc. (Soilogic) personnel have completed the monitoring well installation you requested for the referenced property. Field slotted PVC piezometers were installed at eight (8) locations on the development property on April 10, 2006. One (1) monitoring well remained intact from a previous exploration and is designated as well P-9 on the attached piezometer location diagram. Groundwater level measurements were completed approximately 4 days after installation of the new wells and are indicated on the attached groundwater level summary sheet. We appreciate the opportunity to be of service to you on this project. If we can be of further service to in any way or if you have any questions concerning the enclosed information, please do not hesitate to contact us. Very Truly Yours, Soilogic, Inc. • • Wolf von Carlo If P.E. Principal Engineer APRIL 2006 PROJECT # 06-1007 PIEZOMETER LOCATION DIAGRAM ( f'1 . .- AI.I WELD COUNTY ROAD 36 N C a O >- F- z D O P P—B Irrigation Ditch P-5 P_9 +� y� T TTT P-6 TP—{ T N P-1 NOT TO SCALE WELD COUNTY ROAD 34.5 Note: Several shallow irrigation ditches located on property not indicated on diagram_ HIGHLAND LAKE PROPERTY MEAD, COLORADO Soilogic, Inc. 1435 Hilltop Circle • Windsor, CO 80550 • (970)674-3430 _ d_ r-._ U i . 19 co . J Ifl fi . CD :4. U H- Z >- 1 re 1 W X °i a ` u� N O O CD U) CD a o O Q 0 Cl. X O 2 O 4t o "' J Y O a N w t Q CJ .o = uJ o J J O p Q 3 v Lo O Q V a Lu O 4 P Z U1 0_ H- co 2 `n aa) i9 o 0 2 0 X d_ m C (-N 5 d N d V co o a) O (a N CO 0 O v ------ M..M..MOW P . \ Y m N i gm=nom il e i u i 7met! I 3 re .. Min% �...._. N jIROHIAND LAKE PROPERTY ANNEXATION lilliPEt 3. Water Rights Report The applicant is in discussion with Little Thompson Water District to provide domestic water service to the site. The applicant plans to provide all water rights required by the district to provide that service. The applicant currently owns 80 Highland Lake Water Shares. Other water rights will be contracted and purchased through Little Thompson Water District. The exact number of shares needed will be determined by a study done by Little Thompson Water District In the future, applicant will provide a copy of water rights and water needs study conducted by Little Thompson Water District Current Water Rights Owned: 80 Shares of Highland Lake Water 4. Statement of Community Need Both the Weld County and Town of Mead comprehensive plans acknowledge that the Mead area has the capacity to and will grow significantly between the years 2000 and 2020. The projected minimum growth rate of 3%for Weld County likely underestimates the growth rates that the Town of Mead will experience during the planning period, largely due to the number of already approved subdivisions,the community's proximity to the high growth communities of Longmont and Boulder, and the Town's close proximity to the high growth communities immediately adjacent to the City of Denver, such as Arvada, Thornton and Westminster. Furthermore,Northern Colorado's natural beauty, educational,employment, recreational and cultural opportunities,and desirable climate will continue to attract people to communities like the Town of Mead. The particular demographic profile attracted to the area will be broad and will include families with children, retirees,and single adults. The development proposal's response to the projected demand for housing and parks in the Mead area follows: Expanded Availability of Goods and Services With an additional 500 residents, Mead will begin to attract larger commercial opportunities along its freeway exit and other key commercial areas. Commercial builders waiting for specific residency requirements will begin to show interest in the Town of Mead as population increased. Increased Tax Revenues The preliminary fiscal impact assessment estimates that this development will generate 3.0 million dollars of net one-time revenues and a minimum of 250,000 dollars of annual net recurring revenues. Expanded Housing Opportunities The conceptual master plan proposes the construction of an estimated 180 homes over a period three to five years to support the projected population growth of Mead during the 20 year planning period. The preliminary development plan suggests a variety of lot sizes,price ranges and housing styles. Open Space, Active and Passive Recreation Improvements At build-out, it is estimated that the proposed development will contain approximately 14.4 acres of common open space,consisting of parkland with passive and active recreational areas. The development plan contemplates a comprehensive master plan of integrated parkland and open space sufficient in size and character to support what the Town's comprehensive plan identifies as desired. 5. Statement of School Impact The proposed development will generate approximately 118 students. This is based on a student yield of.66 for single-family detached units. The Minch property will have 180 single-family detached units. The yield is itemized as follows: • 58 elementary students or 11%of the standard capacity of a 525-student elementary school. • 31 middle level students or 4%of the standard capacity of a 750-student middle school. • 29 high school students or 2%of the standard capacity of a 1200-student high school. 6. Development Impact Assessment Statements General Site Location and Description The Minch site is located in the Northwest Ws section 9, Township 3 North, Range 68 West of the 6th P.M., Town of Mead, County of Weld, State of Colorado. More specifically, the site is bounded by Weld County Road 36 to the north, Weld County Road 5 to the west, Weld County Road 34 % to the south and the North Creek subdivision to the east. The 95 acre development consists of/ acre, 1/3 acre, 'V2 acre and 2/3 acre lots. The development impact of the proposed annexation is: 6.1 Water Demand At this time, the Minch Property is located within the service district of the Little Thompson Water District(LTWD). It is the applicant's intention to have the proposed development on the site served by the LTWD. The applicant is in discussions with the water district concerning the project and will be obtaining an agreement to serve the site prior to final approval of the annexation. There is an 8-inch waterline that services the North Creek Subdivision, which borders the site on the southeast corner. There is also a 8-inch water line in County Road 7, which is approximately 0.5 miles east of the site. The 8-inch water line servicing the North Creek Subdivision would need to be extended approximately 100 feet in County Road 34.5 to service the property. The 8-inch water line would need to be continued through the Minch property to County Road 36. Based on experience in the area, Mike Cook at LTWD believes that the existing 8-inch waterlines will provide sufficient service for the site. If water demand exceeds the capacity of the existing 8-inch waterlines, service would need to be extended south from County Road 38 to the site. This would require 1.5 miles of waterline, a master meter, and a pressure reducing valve. There is a great opportunity for the Minch Property to have a non-potable water system for lot and open space irrigation. There are 80 shares of Highland Lake water for the site. The best alternative for an on-site irrigation system would be to place a pump station which can draw water directly from Highland Lake. If that is not possible, a small lake would be needed on-site. 6.2 Sanitary Sewer Demand There are two possibilities for sanitary sewer service for the Minch Property: connection to the lift station in North Creek subdivision or connection to the gravity sewer in Mead Meadows subdivision. Preliminary sizing information from JR Engineering indicates that either option is feasible with regards to capacity. If gravity flow to the North Creek subdivision is possible, and the undeveloped topography indicates that it is, then connection to the lift station would require the least amount of off-site improvements. There is an 8-inch gravity sewer line throughout the North Creek subdivision including a line in West View Drive, which is the westernmost street in the subdivision. In addition, there is a 10-inch gravity line stubbed to the western edge of the Mead Meadows site approximately 1,100 feet south of County Road 34.5. 6.3 Natural Gas Natural gas will be provided by Xcel Energy. There is an existing 3-inch gas line in County Road 34.5 that stops at the southeast corner of the Minch property and a 1.25 inch line in County Road 36 that ends west of the property boundary. 6.4 Electric Demand Electric service for the Town of Mead is provided by United Power. 6.5 Telephone Qwest will be the communications service provider. 6.6 Streets Site access should not be a concern for the Minch property. The site is bounded on the north by County Road 36 and on the south by County Road 36 and on the south by County Road 34.5. In addition, a small section of the property is bounded by County Road 5 to the west. Access to the site is possible from all three existing roads. County Road 34.5 is currently a two-lane paved road. It is possible that turn lanes will be required for access to the site depending on the traffic study recommendations. County Road 36 will need to be improved where it touches the North boundary of the Minch Property. County Road 5.5 is a future arterial that may affect the Edward Minch Annexation Property. The road is a result of a 2003 study regarding parallel reliever arterials. Upon final decision of road alignment, the Minch property will understand its direct affects. If built, County Road 5.5 would likely be a 4-lane arterial with a design speed of 55 mph(posted at 40 or 45 mph). The Minch Property would need to dedicate the full 100-foot right-of-way needed for the ultimate section, but would be required only to build the 2-lane interim section. Final concept plans for the lay- out of the Minch property will be determined by the alignment of County Road 5.5. 6.7 Drainage The topography of the site slopes primarily from west to east. Slightly more than half of the site (55 acres) drains to a weir on the eastern edge of the property. This weir drains into North Creek, which is the swale through the North Creek subdivision. The remainder of the site drains into the existing irrigation ditch that cuts from the west to east across the property. Historically, the entire property drained to North Creek. Please refer to the"Preliminary Drainage Report" provided by TST Engineering. 6.8 Law Enforcement The proposed property would be provided law enforcement services under the Town's current contract with the Weld County Sheriffs Department. The applicant is in contact with the Weld County Sheriffs Office. 6.9 Fire The proposed property is within the Mountain View Fire Protection District. The applicant is in contact with the Fire Marshal about service to this property. 6.10 Parks and Recreation Mead requires .08 Ac per unit in residential areas to be dedicated as open space. Using the basis of 180 residential units on the Minch property,the required residential open space area is 14.4 Ac. The proposed site plan provides around 14 Ac of open space for residential use on the Minch property which fulfills the general requirement. Applicants may request a decrease in open space requirement per lot based on the size and cost of the possible county road 5.5. The open space provided conforms to the suggestions in the Town of Mead Comprehensive Plan for Parks. A large park space is located in the central part of the site and will function as the neighborhood park. Sidewalks and other pathways throughout open space areas will create a pedestrian trail network which will provide access to the neighborhood park. An active play area will be designated within this space and may include a children's playground, picnic shelter, shade structure, benches, small sport court, or other similar features. Enhanced landscape improvements and open turf areas for active play are also anticipated. Passive play areas will also be included throughout the neighborhood park and the remainder of the site. Detention areas are located throughout the site. Some of the detention areas will be counted towards the provided open space amount and will be based upon the depth of the pond and the frequency that the pond will be available to be used for an open play areas. 6.11 Environmental Considerations The applicant is hiring a consultant to perform an environmental assessment and will provide a copy of the report upon completion. 6.12 Economic Development Potential Economic development opportunities attributable to this development include: • Customer Base Expansion:New and existing businesses will also benefit from the development in that an estimated 520 new residents will live in Mead, contributing to the customer base that supports local businesses. • One-time Revenue Generation: In addition,the Town of Mead will benefit from the standard municipal revenues associated with new construction and development activity, estimated at 3.3 million dollars. • Recurring revenues: Recurring revenues associated with this development are estimated at 400,000 dollars annually with annual recurring expenditures of only 120,000. 7. Development Compatibility Statements General Site Location and Description The Minch site is located in the Northwest '/a section 9, Township 3 North, Range 68 West of the 6th P.M., Town of Mead, County of Weld, State of Colorado. More specifically,the site is bound Weld County Road 36 to the north, Weld County Road 5 to the west, Weld County Road 34/12 to the south and the Northwest subdivision to the east. The 95 acre development consists of'A acre, 1/3 acre, V2 acre and 2/3 acre lots. The development compatibility of the proposed annexation is: 7.1 Street Master Plan Access to the proposed subdivision will be from County Road 36 and County Road 34 '/2. At this time, the Town of Mead has said to plan on the anticipated County Road 5.5 to connect these two county roads. Currently,there are 4 major interior roads that will enter the interior of the development from County Road 5.5. The traffic study will dictate the need for turning lanes as traffic increase on County Road 5.5. All interior local streets and street cross sections within the Minch development will adhere to Town of Mead Construction Standards and will be designed and established upon annexation. 7.2 Subdivision Plan The proposed development is a single family detached subdivision that will provide the following advantages: • Housing variety—The larger lot sizes and the variety of lot sizes allows for a variety of housing styles to meet different housing needs. Within the proposed single family detached residential area of the subdivision, lot sizes range between ''A acre and 2/3 acre,while the overall residential density remains at 2.0 dwelling units per acre. The lots will be large enough to encourage a country living feel and small enough to maintain quality landscaping features. • Livable streets—The limited number of entrance roads into the subdivision will encourage only the use of road by local residents. Streets will be wide and traffic will be low enough to encourage walking,bike riding and other activities on the roads and trials of subdivision. • Recreation—With the large parks, the trail system and access to Highland Lake,residents will enjoy an outdoor lifestyle. The goal is to provide larger lots and access to area recreational parks and activities. 7.3 Comprehensive Plan The proposed project is not currently compatible with the Mead Comprehensive Plan in regards to density but has been introduced to the board of trustees in April 2006 and was well received. Land Use Objectives met: a) Increase Mead's tax base through development of well-planned and well-designed developments b) Establish and maintain orderly transitions in use and density between existing and new developments, or in the layout of new developments,to avoid abrupt changes in character-the proposed project incorporates a smooth transition of 1/4 acre lots along the North Creek subdivision boundary. Moving west,the lot sizes gradually get larger up to 2/3 acre lots along the West boundary to blend with the Highland Lake Area lots and historical sites. c)Provide parks, recreational areas, and open space to meet the needs and demands of the residential population as well as Town requirements for open space. A large neighborhood park will be provided centrally within in the site,and will contain active and passive recreational areas. Housing Objectives met: a) Encourage a diverse housing stock which provides for a balanced range of housing opportunities that encourage the preservation of the character of existing neighborhoods and the development of future neighborhood forms which develop as a result of market demands. b)Enforce strong building codes to ensure quality housing construction. CC&R's will be created to enforce building, landscaping and maintenance of properties. Minch has contracted with Intermountain Development to ensure housing quality and subdivision planning. Intermountain builds neighborhoods that they can be proud of and would like to live in themselves. 7.4 Land Use Code The proposed plan is consistent with the Land Use Code, including Buffer yard standards, and Street requirements,parking requirements, Park and Open Space,Environmentally Restricted Land, Bike and Pedestrian Ways and Historical Structure Standards. There are no known incompatibilities with the Town of Mead Land Use Code. 7.5 Existing and Adjacent Land Use Existing and adjacent land uses consist of a medium sized residential subdivision,agricultural land and the Highland Lake area along County Road 5. To our knowledge,the agricultural areas to the North and to the South of the property have no proposed plans for development. The subject annexation proposal and conceptual land use plan for the Minch Property is compatible with existing and planned development in the area by design except for the petition for increased density to 2.0 dwelling units per acre. The proposed increase in density is to accommodate the expensive off-site improvements that will be incurred throughout the development. \ II i R > PRELIMINARY DRAINAGE REPORT ) « �i 'il, ' FOR THE P2 \ / EDWARD MINCH ANNEXATION \ ' li \ } SUBMITTED/� ». ex.» Town o[ �ead, Colorado .w,#: 2■ 4 # k } } \ 6 \: > -« TST : TST. INC CONSULTING ENGINEERS f , \/. ii U . November 21, 2006 Mr. Brett Redd Intermountain Development 378 North 1350 East Pleasant Grove, UT 84062 Re: Edward Minch Annexation—Preliminary Drainage Report Project No. 1066.0010.00 Dear Mr. Redd, We are pleased to submit the Preliminary Drainage Report for the Edward Minch Annexation in Mead, Colorado. This report has been prepared as part of the annexation process for the property. We appreciate this opportunity to provide our service and enjoy working with you as part of your development team. Please do not hesitate to contact us should you have any questions, or should you desire additional services regarding this or any other project. Respectfully, TST INC CONSULTING ENGINEERS Jamie K. Galyon, P.E. Eric M. Fuhrman, P.E. JKG/EMF/mgf Edward Minch Annexation Preliminary Drainage Report TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1.0 Introduction 1.1 Scope and Purpose 1 1.2 Project Location and Description 1 1.3 Previous Studies 1 2.0 Existing Conditions 2.1 Existing Drainage and Groundwater 4 2.2 Criteria for Hydrologic Analysis 4 2.3 Historic Drainage Evaluation 5 3.0 Developed Conditions 3.1 Developed Drainage Evaluation 5 3.2 Detention Pond Sizing 6 4.0 Conclusion 6 5.0 References 7 Figures Figure 1 —Location Map 2 Figure 2—Development Plan 3 Appendices Appendix A—Groundwater Monitoring Report Appendix B—Drainage Analysis Calculations Appendix C—Drainage Basin Delineation Edward Minch Annexation Preliminary Drainage Report 1.0 Introduction 1.1 Scope and Purpose This report presents the findings of the preliminary drainage analysis for the Edward Minch Annexation in Weld County, Colorado near the Town of Mead. A hydrologic analysis of the existing conditions and anticipated developed conditions was completed to determine the location and magnitude of the storm runoff. The hydrologic data was then used to determine a preliminary size for an on-site detention pond_ 1.2 Project Location and Description The project site is located between County Road 36 and County Road 34.5, and east of County Road 5 in Weld County, Colorado. Refer to Figure 1 for the property location. The parcel is approximately 97 acres. Figure 2, prepared previously by Northern Engineering in Utah, presents the proposed development layout. The layout includes approximately 7.4 acres of 2/3 acre lots, 17.2 acres of 1/2 acre lots, 22.7 acres of 1/3 acre lots, 18.7 acres of 1/4 acre lots, and 12.8 acres of open space. 1.3 Previous Studies The drainage analysis presented in this report has been developed in accordance with the guidelines established by the Storm Drainage Criteria and Construction Standards for the Town of Mead (January 1998). Where applicable, the Urban Storm Drainage Criteria Manual (USDCM) Volume 1 was also referenced. The North Creek at Mead Final Drainage Report (Swift & Associates, undated) and the North Creek at Mead Design Analysis(Sear-Brown, 1999) were also referenced. jjjjCjjjjjjTPlc I II Et",, Edward Minch Annexation Preliminary Drainage Report "_ _ .....:. .v :, y - •`� OAD lye F+i, .-I� r.iJC — - i AKA '•\ .i PROJECT 1' SITE • 7JBD'l1SiCN S. 8 f : CC'JNTYROAD 34.5 ..,., J . TOV4ttC7i " ! e Q MEAD 7 it _ . x . ` , .J' s -.1 11 dSi:l '�.:' Figure 1 - Location Map N.T.S. 2 Edward Minch Annexation County Road 36 I t� , I:,-,1,,,, ,,,,jfr" �,,, tti lam^ t. tT Y 3�.1 cl } t ® 1 it v l .a f 1 x. Ii County Road 341/2 SITE TABLE I ACRES w 2/3 Acre Lots 7.37 © • 1/2 Acre Lots 22.66 . 1/3 Acr.Lots 1271 • 1/4 Acre Lots 23.13 fit Northern * open Spec. 14.4 ENGINEERING yLocal Road R.creatle.Trail .r. Bubble Diagram Only-Actual road alignments and acreages TBD Approximately 180 Single Family Dwelling Units Edward Minch Annexation Preliminary Drainage Report 2.0 Existing Conditions 2.1 Existing Drainage and Groundwater The topography of the site slopes primarily from west to east. Slightly more than half the site (approximately 59 acres) drains to a weir on the eastern edge of the property. This weir drains into North Creek, which runs through the North Creek subdivision. The remainder of the site drains into the existing irrigation ditch that cuts from west to east across the property. Historically, the entire property drained to North Creek. The North Creek at Mead Design Analysis reviews the design of the drainage swale through the North Creek subdivision (Sear-Brown, 1999). The main concern of the drainage analysis was flooding that resulted from the overtopping of the berm along the boundary between the Edward Minch Annexation and the North Creek subdivision. The report concluded that the berm was not tall enough to effectively prevent flooding of North Creek subdivision lots just east of the berm_ Based on recent survey data, the berm has been reconstructed as a result of the report. A detention pond in the area will help the flood situation dramatically. The North Creek at Mead Design Analysis, and the resulting design of the berm and swale, assumes historic flow to the subdivision from the drainage basin above North Creek, including the entire Edward Minch Annexation. Soil information for this site was obtained from the Natural Resource Conservation Service (formerly the SCS). Their data shows that the site is approximately 20 percent Nunn clay loam (soil group 'C') and 80 percent Wiley-Colby complex (soil group 'B'). In April 2006, SoiLogic installed 8 new piezometers on the property. One piezometer was installed for a previous exploration and was used by SoiLogic as a 9"` piezometer. The groundwater level at each piezometer was measured four days after the installation of the new piezometers. Results of the monitoring are included in Appendix A. It is important to note that the property was being actively flood irrigated during the monitoring timeframe. Based on the results of the monitoring, it is likely the site will need an underdrain system. 2.2 Criteria for Hydrologic Analysis The Rational Method was selected to calculate runoff for the project site. The Rational Method is based on the following equation: Q=CIA Where Q is the runoff in cubic feet per second (cfs), C is the runoff coefficient, I is the rainfall intensity in inches per hour, and A is the area of the basin in acres. The rainfall intensities used for the rational analysis were obtained from the Storm Drainage Criteria and Construction Standards for the Town of Mead(January 1998). 1j1j111j1111"" f,'NrO,r FNS 4 Edward Minch Annexation Preliminary Drainage Report 2.3 Historic Drainage Evaluation Two basins were delineated based on historic drainage patterns (Appendix C). These basins were used for the Rational Method calculation of peak runoff for historic/existing conditions. Attenuated flow rates were used to size detention ponds. For purposes of historic drainage evaluation, it is assumed that irrigation ditches are full and therefore all runoff flows to North Creek. The runoff coefficient used in the Rational Method is dependant on the percent impervious of a given basin. For the historic evaluation, residential areas upstream of the site were assumed to be 25% impervious and the irrigated fields were assumed to be 2% impervious. A results summary of the historic hydrologic analysis may be found in Tables 1 and 2. Complete results and calculations are shown in Appendix B. Table 1. Summary of Historic Hydrologic Analysis a' it ,tT 4� r z ,, RAht d try A 53.7 6.9 43.1 124.9 a 58.6 6.5 52.1 159.1 Table 2. Summary of Historic Attenuation .r',.prey i� r x:.a r3L jy. r tikfi9N '�* ,`fy'` a�a� g . A.B 112.3 12.4 87.5 2583 3.0 Developed Conditions 3.1 Developed Drainage Evaluation The project site was delineated into 9 basins based on the proposed development layout, including two off-site basins which contribute to the runoff on the Edward Minch Annexation (Appendix C). The basins were used for the Rational Method calculation of peak runoff for developed conditions. Attenuated flow rates were used to size detention ponds. It is assumed that the irrigation ditch will be diverted through the project site and will therefore not impede drainage to North Creek. Based on the North Creek at Mead Design Analysis, the swale is adequately sized to accept the runoff from the entire Edward Minch Annexation. 5 Edward Minch Annexation Preliminary Drainage Report The runoff coefficient used in the Rational Method is dependant on the percent impervious of a given basin. For the developed conditions, percent imperviousness has been based on the Urban Storm Drainage Criteria Manual. A results summary of the developed hydrologic analysis may be found in Tables 3 and 4. Complete results and calculations are shown in Appendix B. Table 3. Summary of Developed Hydrologic Analysis PEAK U� RC 41 -;-:::::',4{•.it) r I 5.58 7.6 8.3 20.2 2 9.53 4.3 13.7 32.8 3 20.84 10.3 28.9 68.6 4 5.15 3.2 8.6 19.2 5 9.65 4.6 14.4 34.9 6 15.89 2.3 14.1 415 7 23.35 14.1 36.5 823 8 14.05 9.3 22.6 50.0 9 8.30 5.5 13.3 29.5 Table 4.Summary of Developed Attenuation Yv o.e,, d�^ ,ti k� : a T x � . 8� f l'n F, x,74, 4`5 ,�.4 *UK C.a4 Z Lf y.' , 1 I.2 1511 6.9 21.7 52.1 2 4 I 20.26 10.0 29.9 70.4 3 3 2 41.09 19.8 56.6 134.9 4 5,7 33.00 18.5 49.9 115.3 5 6,8,9 3,4 112.34 47.3 135.9 320.8 3.2 Detention Pond Sizing In accordance with the Stonn Drainage Criteria and Construction Standards for the Town of Mead (January 1998), the detention pond for the site was sized to detain the developed 100-year runoff and release at the 10-year historic rate. The 10-year historic runoff is 87.5 cfs. Based on this release rate and the 100-year attenuated inflow of 320.8 cfs, the required storage in the pond is 7.2 acre-ft. Complete detention pond sizing calculations are shown in Appendix B. 4.0 Conclusion Based on the presented drainage analysis of the Edward Minch Annexation, the development of the site will not adversely affect the existing drainage facilities downstream. A 7.2 acre-ft detention pond will be required to detain on-site flows. The ^_ TST,IA(..EnN$UL,1 vv ENGen=ew[ 6 Edward Minch Annexation Preliminary Drainage Report irrigation ditch that transverses the site will need to be diverted and kept in service upon development of the site. Additional drainage facilities, including street capacity, inlets, and storm sewer pipes, will need to be evaluated as the site progresses through the development process. An underdrain system will likely be needed to prevent high groundwater levels from adversely affecting the improvements on the site. 5.0 References The Sear-Brown Group, 1999, North Creek at Mead Design Analysis. The Sear-Brown Group, 1998, Storm Drainage Criteria and Construction Standards, Town of Mead, Colorado. Swift& Associates, undated, North Creek at Mead Final Drainage Report. Urban Drainage & Flood Control District (UDFCD), 2001, Urban Storm Drainage Criteria Manual Volume 1. rs, iNc Cor+SoLruiG E,.tS ,«a,. 7 J-. APPENDIX A Groundwater Monitoring Report LOGIC April 14. ?0()( My Utah Land Company 1 404 West State Street. Suite 6 Pleasant Grove. Utah 84062 Attn: Mr. Brent Redd Re: Monitoring Well Installation I lighland Lake Property Mead_Colorado Soilogic Project !06-1007 Mr. Redd: As requested. Soilogic. Inc. (Soilogic) personnel have completed the monitoring well installation you requested for the referenced property. Field slotted PVC piezomcters were installed at eight (K)locations on the development property on April 10. 2006. One (t)monitoring well remained intact from a previous exploration and is designated as well P-9 on the attached piezometer location diagram. Groundwater level measurement; were completed approximately 4 days :tiler installation of the nest wells and are indicated on the attached groundwater level StIMIllarl shed. We appreciate the opportunity to he of service to you on this project. If we can be of further service to in any way or if you have any questions concerning the enclosed information,please do not hesitate to contact us. Very Truly Yours. Soilogic,lne. y0 - OHC TS_ • Wolf von Carlow' Principal Engineer Soilogic, Inc. 1435 H Wop Circle •Windsor. CO 80550• (970)679-343C APRIL 2OO6 PROJECT # 06-1007 1 PIEZOMETER LOCATION DIAGRAM �`�. `o LOGIC WELD COUNTY ROAD 36 U?j I G }- z 0 u j c / P-7 -847 Irrigation OHM 4 I// e P-5 P-g / P-3 P-2 / f P-4 IY P-1 NOT TO SCALE WELD COUNTY ROAD 34.5 Note: Several shallow irrigation ditches located on property not indicated on diagram HIGHLAND LAKE PROPER IY MEAD, COLORADO el ir, i iji19 -1 U . !-- o to , . 1 0 7 1 i I 1 In i I I F t' I a v., i` • o d iv 1 o • O 4t o 111 i 43 L'3 Z o _ D O cri c,, W 0. t to N : 1111 to d O R " o ch O APPENDIX B Drainage Analysis Calculations '5" (O CO f� CO (O N CO CA CA 6 to to to to to In to to to 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ,-1. r+� d >. CO CO r CO CD r `4) C7 f G 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ra' 3' £ N C L a) co o R Co oD v (O CO m b CI > N N O C) N r CA) ('') M r . d o o 0 o a 0 0 d c. o T 0 0 CV CO O CO CO 0 0 e. >` CV CV CV CV CV 0 N co co cV 0 0 o d 0 0 p 0 0 try �.I m w o a y'x ' CV CV C O d a s o 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 - , p 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 'a ffo a 'a " ;y.^�S, ti,f`,.: • --- ul 0 CV N Cr) 10 CO V'L O 0 C • r . , •k O a I a c "MGR• ci Nr Y•s fN W T .- 5 m _,; :.-R c o r O O v O p tt 1•y .. a C7 O �v <�4{ O W T O 6. N y!_a. ,, et. ,c • a a E a a es co • 4 CV .. S. 01 ` t7 Q' T o E o G . m N `'" RI in • O m f�f) N 6 ^:C�y 'J; a CV to Q) . :�; (13 b w'. A Yu!�MMTM � p_ A a to z T:e,' i- in m b t` to (7 434 t�) F '1 Q to . N '0 . 1° N Q CO ;4 li ! O r CV CI) N' U) CO N. CO O) 15L Iv_.Ccrosui.n.c.tr,o.,n-v_. Table B-3. Hydrologic Analysis RUNOFFtOEE9FYClore{C) A�y Orig . ) AREA nIB , SE " BASIN (Aa)' 2-YR '' S-YR 10-YR le0.YA . ,I 1� ( } v y E Historic A 5172 0.08 0.18 0.28 0.52 500 1.1 36.0 II 58.61 0.06 0.16 0.26 0.51 500 1.2 35.6 Developed I 5.58 0.20 0.28 0.36 0.56 500 1.0 33.0 2 9.53 0.20 028 0.36 0.56 500 1.0 33.0 3 20.84 0.22 0.30 0.38 057 500 1.0 32.1 4 5.15 0.26 0.34 0.41 0.58 500 1.0 30.9 5 9.65 0.20 0.28 0.36 056 500 1.0 33.0 6 15.89 0.08 0.18 0.28 052 500 1.0 37.1 7 2335 0.26 0.34 0.41 058 500 1.0 30.9 8 14.05 0.30 0.36 0.43 0.59 50) 1.0 29.8 9 8.30 0.30 036 0.43 0.59 5(X) 1,0 29.8 Drainage Analysis Calculations-2 of 4 C, .42 — moo, re oc n r " ; T - rl ..� 0 O N in r- — — a !C a — v: r a ,c a ar^ c - N OC �C N a r !r. O VI Co)y C el L r - a 'C rS T w " a N CO a V — N O a .. T N N V> V _ 0 ,L N V: N N: 'C - rr. Q OC V: N O J t._ Wa � .. cxr y� graV �j cam. N F. OG ? 'S ,c N1 ^; T .. v - rr - rn ri - c y.� Ws _ 2,1 .C v n. cr = re.. -it N V a vJ re) it a "^ O v; c c 4 .t 0 v: try- CV- r 6 O r, r, c. C4 a Na ,O Cc in cc in o — ,:c 4 -rc — o q Jr ".�• Q aC c o x .,,,,, _ rr rl ... a. j¢�y L ^ G C V; ir; c C a v: r vi H ei N N C. - V� 'J�, Y a v:. - - N oR P 1- yg � "� N K V ft. T. V' V tr. , re.. red _. 3_ .. s G s' - ; ". ; ',` ^ gam OOOC ^ oohs., 0 .g rt i Y r Y rr: N t "t a Cr_ N r • a - T — N N r. FN N N — N r4 eV C V) ,C+ V — ^ c 0 i& t '4. 0 F F r Y 4 1- V; (V ]r C w N - 44 ' ,,`•^ . s Q Z O r . Vi er .o — ,or ,ct . — v C Q O C(4 C -I' Fes" r-. -. _ ,,J vC r` ( N r ;jf^ a ,i74,-,:r,• -+'a z 'G V } — ,O J n r r- 2 ap e; o 1 € (; 3 + o o c o c c Mt. C9-^"-^1,'",+a c j — O N a - -t V1 V co - N N GC AI, , - rC v: V CC N K iG ,G `D C Q C } Cl ionmare ,n r a, a Cl 6 cc.6 M 6 N CO 5 ., ,, 10.1� CO . 0 0 0 o a �. 0 i .— — Fr O — rr, oc = -- a vi .o r` C .-04;i,I: F >1 8 O — N V- N N N N N N y N 4% V N i( V V ) l nl V in V) i Vl V1 4Y !, C; C Q r4 r o — C: N Q - N V rr, - e �- Z Y t- v; N b ,Ob bb VG Y+ brt0 � ti : z L N z J ey¢, in in F CO V- N- n vi CI :ri `O Q a arse m r. al 4r. y � O Q v; i- O°' T G TS I.Irvc CO3ut:ant: EMc.inc[a� Table B-5. Detention Pond Sizing Regionat Pond 1i*atDeientiOll Fegtoreelent Area= 11233 ac Frequency= 100 yr C(100yr)=0.57 Release.Rate=87.50 efs 10-yr Historic ;� Mn- T(me(sec): InteneitYRenal , ,Q.in(Cls) -Y.In(et) 'Qoat(cfs) VMAW) Required Volume 5 300 9.39 601.12 180447 87.50 26250 154087 10 600 7.36 471.22 282735 _ 87.50 52500 230235 15 900 6.09 390.13 351120 87.50 78750 272370 20 1200 5.22 334.35 401220 87.50 105000 296220 25 1500 4.58 293.46 440186 87.50 131250 308936 30 1800 4.09 262.10 471779 87.50 157500 314279 35 2100 3.71 237.23 498190 87.50 183750 314440 40 2400 3.39 217.00 520790 87.50 210000 310790 _ 45 2700 3.13 200.18 540486 87.50 236250 304236 50 3000 2.90 185.97 557906 87.50 262500 295406 55 3300 2.71 173.79 574502 87.50 288750 284752 60 3600 2.55 163.22 587605 87.50 315000 272605 65 3900 2.40 153.97 600468 87.50 341250 259218 70 4200 2.28 145.78 612285 87.50 367500 244785 75 4500 2.16 138.49 623210 87.50 393750 229460 80 4800 2.06 131.95 633367 87.50 420000 213367 85 5100 1.97 126.05 642854 . 87.50 446250 196604 90 5400 1.89 120.70 651753 87.50 472500 179253 95 5700 1.81 115.81 660134 87.50 498750 161384 100 6000 1.74 111.34 668052 87.50 525000 143052 105 6300 1.67 107.23 675556 87.50 551250 124306 110 6600 1.62 103.44 682688 87.50 577500 105188 115 6900 1.56 99.93 689483 87.50 603750 85733 120 7200 1.51 96.66 695972 87.50 630000 65972 Required Volume (of) 314897 (acre-ft) 7.23 Drainage Analysis Calculations-4 of 4 APPENDIX C Drainage Basin Delineation `i'1�. Y 3S ''@.3.• Y',y A Lµ9'' ''d: 'I.x+s"` . , ' s, °- > S.x y,.z��n �.; 'W :. °. Yom„ 4 i+'`f i�} tF w `.', ,.Y lag � `$,t A`• t v s w '' �y'4 f -itt,.„r k,cws '- '� '.'l x µrA' '.- F aZ. .Lys-:'trAu 415 J iY' ,,i . Y .. �3a �- a.h"a,._," :- - .yN iG� tt j fir: KT z_ r •t e-* .≤ _ ma ir +�(yi P Y P rtilliC Y- y 'Y Xf/ _:4 : L: 5 Y t Yy XY , Y . ^ E 4• S Pte,?.: feig C `4� '� 6 e r+ -: F 19 �aa A}x w,-:.1,*-, j { ' + k �$t. Lam. a�,._.a' `'ret� sla '`s' '":' °' `[ 'i a' y • may, li,t rS'��.<t ' • f Ta:41i.-F s•t a� t ,P--2:4-1,4-1.1 • a $ tf „s 1 I ` `C K�,"- -'.. + --L*4V,`5fr, ' ' ,zy' K . „�� '. uTa w,t-�'lj'^'n`3.'�«a�,5 'kR 4<fr 3'L� ..t.c.w '- a m v y r . F 'k � s FG+a <,x 4k k3 1 y'Y ; ,n1� [Y N - �.• -.% 9 •-. £S `` a kzt a €° "'?n > m,, .e„eC' fv fi-tYs _ {� y• - z - ik 'i -.t ��3I z..cl4t t t+ Lt>=S s sir vrPls. h i 4T js, ✓k 'f� �'`� d y w � r t r • ex . e 3'-'' l.,t 5 'r" `1Y y 10- r } .' aA« k "5•c. 2• .a s 1 s j r tq t, '.- '*t_, ,„tt yy� n ,c r� yam, • ssr r 3 iv,.., : ��,> .4-s. ._ `l;e..x. 5A tklr:Rfi 1-4X*r'1: s. i^fi krcS + 'J. '� t ; :t s-ir J a^x �4A_ r a ae'., ,� � -t, � �' � �k"m.4. 'T t 4¢i,� s�`Y.S'`h 7 t- ,st. 4 .rµ § _ m`' r Y 4 4+ 'i f. r a ,t z, n-'7. 4414",,------.144'.-"-±1, -;;;,---,,,.. . 5 v r f-1 R,S TJ A*7" r^`y-'I �� e "' f�F z k " n - i y '+. t . ar-,r F s w y a y e tWi '` �'�mr 7 • . eY �1 3 r ..,,,' �,tin,„.4.-4Y2,r • : C\ t �•'�e•� 7,i�i S��y��t '� �g.� }y}y�x aY - k � ° `�` e` 2 < r•�ry r ti,,.a `.,n�pX '₹ ✓ # ` ' tiii t� f A d 3 £5n ,Y„ tq.ri� 'D�'xzv , , b -€w.a t9 , k 3it:'* z :3y ++� s•S ''Sr 3xY .(+. t. S Fr"'rd^ c. -et.n is y o r }e F fi 'µ 3 3s p Y xt"r�' u'#..el P y.,F ems' z: �-: $4 3,4 x k5fn�f 1x a. 1 n - +r :-- Y r i '>" -` s',Vy;.�c€ c eR t?, s -'s7f •°y +• fR°.a 4 "�Sx'xrj' '' of 4y ,1 r �"" u l Z* I r 'r .3K6 Land" hb a +.j fl5 .x a r }w .a I }�r h t Nx t z.vc a ,°o r'r ea" r 'fr y 1 } N ..,> n3 'e` y,.x+ %-i k,-4, r• "tJh m f ik Z`.„ izm »„aE 1• ,,kke , ,..0.,.-„,;:z,, . f. i'P if ,iz fir ` SsW 1.,-. y,� ,t "47:: `aa''a 'Y, < eZL k-qg� > Y x '4`�'-'''t t4 3 d'�.GcY ° .n,. ,7-'µ ' i " z�t'.t. i s t w, ;v^: Y Yt_£-•• 7 x ^kbkkA,,l fit. Y vZ-}a `K.-4 'rk it ts. v n+ k '. • -y4�^ v,}4 t 4•knr fsa� Ttttvzt'..--,-,4,-.44..4 , 581T3 e4' ta:'.wf n "-Iv o.. 'y a A^'k< fk rt a :Ca a -r�d'y1b_t X+"`rs t +y. �'��t .et'x }}'A f .r;IPc ��n FP a e s `E t�{, d 0 ,0 'n'C�,r 'r P 4h x .4O,.g" t s�Y e a 4 1,,, ?.m+g "�F�,, t ea;t..r Y-°'- t } •h`Sr� "� s ,4 t, nti, Y ': N'r! P Tr 44 a .s z. dz,• a9 J.. x�'2rw ra 6 ., trr'i' ''€�A + x.v'x,. t xmt -( g T 1(t r . 4Klt 4, '4 rwx :6440 -fi:Vi'Z Y- w #y x •" 3 h: Js .• 'tY.,. 'k• 4 4. a*n ab t i a z r ,?`�` tii F ��4.t u t n' t n ti,. M' r >'�' : �,,x ' F` .,s z f 'r+ x�ay > is-t {{��r.31 Fea'',�. kf � 'yr *,'.' r ?1 }�% 'fti+ •.,,, €- vj - ; i- ...vK ₹,w.,.. -, ?- c e w-li n .t . .. <RU' s:, `r7. . ,y.-,• _Si t,'-'44---•1 4• 'Q r)y"` M' I 'A"/ r� a f 1°i Pry �'}' 'v ii,- i e f f t Q`� I LFYk� +t �. t '5>r` . eq� tGT4% CI S.# r�. L i i 4,hF+, art2M11FXti% z. 'fnl 4v'3- s-,.+z qfitr<ILL y } r iF' `1"3' y�K x 2f -fri�"✓C<, C J I A w i W�H. t 1 f, h, Y 4 H ; µ�, � Ola nl , z rr........ z11 ,== EDWARD MINCH PROPERTY ANNEXATION ill ne { == Iliglir6 EXISTING DRAINAGE BASINS C__ li ....-- -- _OJT ^f } � Psi ! k #� k YFS t -1,-,-.$,,4' 1 rw { d ''- , •y,t mat s t a _Y� Ma I $ r Ps r SIDti J 4 M1{ fi o Li, • u;,'4 t:,., r. - 4k . Ais , ...iz I p 111 II l imams1111.1_,EIE p Town of Mead P.O.Box 626 441 Third Street Mad"A Little Town Mead,Colorado 80542-0626 With a Big Future" (970)535-4477 May 15, 2007 • CERTIFIED MAIL# 7006 2150 0002 8658 6701 Weld County Board of Commissioners P.O. Box 758 Greeley, CO 80632 RE: Required Annexation Impact Report - Edward Minch Annexation to the Town of Mead. Gentlemen: In accordance with the requirements of C.R.S. § 31-12-108.5, enclosed is a copy of the Annexation Impact Report prepared for the proposed Edward Minch Annexation to the Town of Mead. You have received prior notice of the public hearings before the Planning Commission and the Board of Trustees for this proposal. In the event that you have any questions regarding this Annexation Impact Report, or the proposed annexation, you may contact Richard E. Samson, the Town's Attorney, at (303) 776-1169. Very truly yours, - 1(1,-4'122i,t- Candace Bridgwater Town Clerk 03//13333 04 4) V 91 AYH LODZ SN3NOISSIWW00 .11N000 013M sa' / Ph p,6 /( c 2ev/ec-} C< s-21 - 07 Annexation Impact Report Edward Minch Annexation May 15, 2007 Prepared for: Town of Mead P.O. Box 626 Mead, CO 80542 Table of Contents Page Project Description 1 II. Municipal Services 1 Ill. Special Districts 1 IV. School District Impact 1 V. Exhibits 2 A. Existing Conditions Map and Proposed Land Use Map Forward: This"annexation impact report" has been prepared pursuant to Section 31-12-108.5 Colorado Revised Statutes, 1986 Repl. Vol. Contained in Appendix"A" is a map depicting the proposed annexation, the existing and proposed public services to the property and the existing and proposed land uses for the property. I. Project Description: The property proposed for annexation consists a single annexation of a portion of the Northwest Quarter of Section 9, Twp. 3 North, Range 68 West of the 6th P.M., County of Weld, State of Colorado. The proposed annexation consists of 94.252 acres located west of the North Creek subdivision in Mead, Colorado, and between Weld County Roads 34 ''A and 36. The annexation is contiguous to the Town on its northern and eastern boundaries and satisfies the 1/6 contiguity with the Town boundaries required by statute. The land proposed to be annexed is owned by Edward Minch, 17072 County Rd. 5, Mead, CO 80542 and under contract to Intermountain Development and Investments, 1440 W. State St#6, Pleasant Grove, Utah 84062. The property is proposed for the development of approximately 180 single-family dwellings on the 94.252 acres. The property consists of irrigated agricultural land with a residential subdivision of 1/4 acre, single-family homes abutting the property on the eastern boundary and large lot rural homes on the west. To the north and south, the property remains in agricultural production with individual farmsteads. The land is currently zoned A (Agricultural) by Weld County. In conjunction with the proposed annexation, the zoning will change to medium density residential uses in conformance with the Town's Land Use Code. II. Municipal Services: Municipal services for the Edward Minch Annexation will be provided in the following manner: Electricity Electric services are to be provided by the present supplier, United Power Inc., the electric franchisee for the Town of Mead. Telephone U.S. West Communications Water Little Thompson Water District, property could be subject to the Howland Settlement. Sanitary Sewer Town of Mead. Fire The site is currently served by the Mountain View Fire Protection District. Police Weld County Sheriff, under contract with the Town of Mead. Street Maintenance Maintenance of roadways within the annexation will be provided by the Town after construction of roads to Town specifications and acceptance by the Board of Trustees. Financing the municipal services within the area to be annexed is addressed in an annexation agreement between the applicant and the Town of Mead. The annexation agreement is currently under negotiation and is not available at this time. III. Special Districts: The area to be annexed is included within the following special districts: St. Vrain Valley School District RE-1J Mountain View Fire Protection District Northern Colorado Water Conservancy District St. Vrain - Left Hand Water Conservancy District Longmont Soil Conservation District Weld County Library IV. School District Impact: It is anticipated that the annexation will bring a benefit to the St. Vrain School District RE1J due to the increase in valuation, and will contribute approximately 118 K-12 students to the school system. 1 V. Exhibits C J it i• C 9, c I 0 O a J E N (15E '0 O t t I -O 'p N CO ;p 2 C J ■ ! 1 IIwl ills n t�� .viii! IINWG Infil "Zr t' °AF111I! IARiIP ` .- uuum V _p .i ram yr - ,_., e � ri� � C' 1” EMMEN MN CD a Eta UM s EMS ME ME n 'SEE ! 4 NE .SINE' WM'MSS . R N C IJ a J C a` Ua c 2 �� o o +. +. V U I' t c rJ1 irl i? '.` l r; t . W 1 i ,. -% I W S �� , ' I S . i e I IIII II j{ Town of Mead � 1 P.O.Box 626 441 Third Street Mad"A Utde Town Mead,Colorado 80542-0626 With a Big Future" (970)5354477 May 15, 2007 • CERTIFIED MAIL#7006 2150 0002 8658 6602 Weld County Board of Commissioners P.O. Box 758 Greeley,CO 80632 RE: Notice of Public Hearing- Edward Minch Annexation Board of Trustees- 7:00 P.M., Tuesday,June 11, 2007. Gentlemen: Please be advised that a public hearing before the Mead Board of Trustees has been set to review and consider the annexation of the Northwest Quarter of Section 9, Twp. 3 North, Range 68 West of the 6h P.M., County of Weld, State of Colorado. The property is owned by Edward Minch, 17072 County Rd 5, Mead, CO 80542 and under contract to Intermountain Development and Investments, 1440 W. State St #6, Pleasant Grove, Utah 84062. The property is proposed for the development of approximately 180 single-family dwellings on the 94.252 acres. In accordance with C.R.S. § 31-12-108 (2),this notice has been sent to the Board of County Commissioners and County Attorney for Weld County, and to each special district or school district having territory within the area to be annexed. Attached is a copy of the published public hearing notice,together with a copy of the adopted resolution of intent to annex and the applicant's petition for annexation. You have previously received copies of the "Letter of Intent"provided with the application,and maps of the property location and a "concept plan"for the development of the property. Copies of the full application, as well as the full- sized maps submitted with the application are available for review in the Mead Town Hall, 441 -3r° Street, Mead, Colorado. Written comments may be sent to Town Clerk, Box 626, Mead, CO 80542. Very truly yours, Q)2444-LL Candace Bridgwater Town Clerk a3AI3o3b oft b V 91 AVW l�l Sa3NOISSIWW03 AlNf103 013M Minch B0T Notice to Co&Sp Dlst.wpd 10/27/00(11:27 AM) r NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING MEAD BOARD OF TRUSTEES EDWARD MINCH ANNEXATION NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Board of Trustees of the Town of Mead has adopted a Resolution of Intent initiating annexation proceedings for the "Edward Minch Annexation," said Annexation being more particularly described in the following Resolution No. 17-R-2007. The Board of Trustees of the Town of Mead will hold a Public Hearing commencing at 7:00 p.m., Monday, June 11, 2007, at the Mead Town Hall, 441 - 3r° Street, Mead, Colorado 80542, for the purpose of reviewing the petition and making a recommendation to the Board of Trustees regarding whether the property proposed to be annexed meets the applicable requirements of the statutes of the State of Colorado and is eligible for annexation to the Town of Mead, and to recommend the appropriate land use for the property, if requested. Any person may appear at the Public Hearing and be heard regarding the matters under consideration. Copies of the petition and supporting material submitted to the Town are on file and available for public inspection in the Office of the Town Clerk, at the Mead Town Hall, 441 - 3rd Street, Mead, Colorado 80542. Dated this 11`h day of May, 2007. TOWN OF MEAD, COLORADO By: /s/Candace Bridawater Town Clerk Minch BOT Notice to Co S.Sp Dist.wpd 10/27/00(11:27 AM) TOWN OF MEAD, COLORADO RESOLUTION NO. 17-R-2007 A RESOLUTION FINDING SUBSTANTIAL COMPLIANCE AND INITIATING ANNEXATION PROCEEDINGS FOR CERTAIN PROPERTIES IN WELD COUNTY, COLORADO TO THE TOWN OF MEAD, SAID ANNEXATION TO BE KNOWN AS THE EDWARD MINCH ANNEXATION. WHEREAS, a written petition together with four (4) prints of an annexation map for annexation of certain properties have been filed with the Board of Trustees of the Town of Mead by Edward Minch, 17072 County Rd 5, Mead, CO 80542 and Intermountain Development and Investments, 1440 W. State Street, #6, Pleasant Grove, Utah 84062; and WHEREAS, the Board of Trustees has reviewed the petitions and supporting material; and WHEREAS, the Board of Trustees wishes to permit simultaneous consideration of the subject property for annexation and zoning, if requested in the petition; and WHEREAS, the Board of Trustees has reviewed the petitions and desires to adopt by Resolution its findings in regard to the petitions; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF MEAD, COLORADO, as follows: Section 1. The petition, whose legal description is attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated by reference herein, is accepted and determined to be in substantial compliance with the applicable laws of the State of Colorado. Section 2. No election is required under C.R.S. §31-12-107(2). Section 3. No additional terms and conditions are to be imposed except those provided for in the petitions. Section 4. The Board of Trustees will hold a public hearing for the purpose of determining if the proposed annexation complies with C.R.S. §31-12-104, and with C.R.S. §31- 12-105, and will hold a public hearing to determine the appropriate zoning of the subject properties if requested in the petition, at the Mead Town Hall, 441 3r° Street, Mead, Colorado 80542, at the following time and date: 7:00 pm, Monday June 11, 2007 Section 5. Any person may appear at such hearing and present evidence relative to the proposed annexation or the proposed zoning. Section 6. Upon completion of the hearing, the Board of Trustees shall set forth, by Minch BOT Notice to Co 8 Sp Distwpd 10/27/00(11 27 AM) resolution, its findings and conclusions with reference to the eligibility of the proposed annexation, and whether the statutory requirements for the proposed annexation have been met, and further, will determine the appropriate zoning of the subject property if requested in the petition. Section 7. If the Board of Trustees concludes, by resolution, that all statutory requirements have been met and that the proposed annexation is proper under the laws of the State of Colorado, the Board of Trustees shall pass one or more ordinances annexing the subject property to the Town of Mead, and shall pass one or more ordinances zoning the subject property if requested in the petition. INTRODUCED, READ, PASSED, AND ADOPTED THIS 9th DAY OF April , 2007. ATTEST: TOWN OF MEAD By /s/Candace Bridgwater By /s/ Richard W. Macomber Candace Bridgwater, Town Clerk Richard W. Macomber, Mayor Minch SOT Notice to Co&Sp Dist wptl 10/27/00(11:27 AM) EXHIBIT A EDWARD MINCH PROPERTY Legal Description: A TRACT OF LAND LOCATED IN THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 68 WEST OF THE 6 P.M., COUNTY OF WELD, STATE OF COLORADO, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE NORTH SECTION LINE OF SAID SECTION 9, N 89°23'24" E, A DISTANCE OF 1235.00 FEET FROM THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 9, THENCE S 3°30'00" W, A DISTANCE OF 30.21 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE: S 3°30'00" W, A DISTANCE OF 480.42 FEET; THENCE N 89°15'20" W, A DISTANCE OF 161.00 FEET; THENCE S 3°30'00" W, A DISTANCE OF 198.00 FEET; THENCE S 12°08'00" W, A DISTANCE OF 329.15 FEET; THENCE N 89°15'20" W, A DISTANCE OF 135.00 FEET; THENCE S 12°28'18" W, A DISTANCE OF 105.28 FEET; THENCE N 89°15'47" E, A DISTANCE OF 169.50 FEET; THENCE S 00°00'00" E, A DISTANCE OF 1187.00 FEET; THENCE S 33°08'30" E, A DISTANCE OF 322.25 FEET; THENCE N 89°16'06" E, A DISTANCE OF 1492.79 FEET; THENCE N 00°05'55" W, A DISTANCE OF 2548.45 FEET TO A POINT, FROM SAID POINT THE NORTH 1/4 CORNER OF SAID SECTION 9 BEARS N 00°05'55" W, A DISTANCE OF 30.13 FEET; THENCE S 89°23'24" W, A DISTANCE OF 1404.72 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. Minch BOT Notice to Co 2.Sp Distwpd 10/27/00(1127 AM) Hello