The URL can be used to link to this page

Browse Search

Home My WebLink About20073262.tiff s Traffic Impact Study 7 c THE WATERFRONT AT FOSTER LAKE ) �.. Weld County, Colorado E ) }O f5 Prepared For. Tetra Tech RMC 1900 S. Sunset St.,#1-F ( ; Longmont, CO 80501 I r C2= J i t (T f > f �^ j= E ( 3 Prepared By: t_ Eugene G. Coppola P.E. E P. O. Box 260027 Littleton, CO 80163 r 303-792-2450 o r wA�August 29, 2006 " � !o 'a €� OF COL E I F {. - 2007-3262 I _.,' IC) E Table of Contents (' I. INTRODUCTION 1 II. CURRENT CONDITIONS 3 A. Road Network 3 I B. Traffic Volumes 3 C. Operating Conditions 6 I f_ D. Surrounding Land Uses 7 i III. FUTURE CONDITIONS 7 A. Development Assumptions 7 ( B. Site Traffic 9 € f , t ' C. Trip Distribution 10 („ D. Background Traffic 10 le; E. Future Total Traffic 16 C F. Future Roadway System 16 IV. TRAFFIC IMPACTS 23 A. Future Roadway Features 24 41 VI. CONCLUSIONS 30 i IF > t t � Y aa ( g[£ U 11; € � ; i f . f 1 1. f 10 List of Figures E Figure 1 Vicinfy Map 2 i a Figure 2 Current Roadway Geometry 4 ( ) Figure 3 Current Traffic 5 Figure 4 Concept Plan 8 Figure 5 Site Traffic Distribution 11 Figure 6 2010 Site Traffic 12 i Figure 7 2015 Site Traffic 13 Figure 8 2025 Site Traffic 14 ( ° Figure 9 2010 Background Traffic 17 Figure 10 2015 Background Traffic 18 { Figure 11 2025 Background Traffic 19 Figure 12 2010 Total Traffic „ 20 Figure 13 2015 Total Traffic 21 Figure 14 2025 Total Traffic 22 i Figure 15 2010 Roadway Geometry 25 Figure 16 2015 Roadway Geometry 28 Figure 17 2025 Roadway Geometry 31 k Er L F { ell s U Ci • 11 t ffi` 1 _ I. INTRODUCTION The Waterfront at Foster Lake is a proposed residential development consisting of both single family and multi-family uses. As currently envisioned, it will have 1,268 t single family residential units, 375 multi-family units, and a community center. The site is generally located between County Road 26(CR 26)and County Road 28 (CR 28), east of County Road 7(CR 7) in Weld County, Colorado. A vicinity map is presented in Figure 1. f t } ( l This traffic impact study assesses the development as currently defined. It contains ( the investigations and analyses typically contained in a full traffic study. Key steps undertaken as part of this study are defined below. { ' • Obtain current traffic and roadway data in the immediate area of the site. • Evaluate current traffic operations to establish baseline conditions. ( • Determine site generated traffic volumes and distribute this traffic to the nearby { street system. • Estimate roadway traffic for Phase 1 (2010), Phase 11 (2015), and Phase Ill `. (2025)of development. ( ,' • Evaluate future traffic conditions with each phase of The Waterfront at Foster (_? Lake fully developed. I • Identify areas of potential deficiencies. • Recommend measures to mitigate the impact of site traffic as appropriate. [ t 1 . t. r , tiI I ilp i f i (.) C3 1 . , i IINV VICINITY MAP t : . c • iiiive,...4.1la II , ,. w liG II■ • n � .1 ' ' 11. I ,t CUM A w'1 P... i''1 ■ THE WATERFRON "a: ,„'r..9-L, 7 . ► AT FOSTER LAKE 27 .�■ x 26 - Foster c ' { Sat" -. �- Lake 5 JAMES 4%PIO ENDA ' ANDS SON PROPERTY 3 �' di "/ //%y "'It ' /if .',.,/NCI / /77,/ 0,-_-• T / :, ✓y Fr _la.fLL • ' /:7// r, �: - lic .%r h G ( ! I t s rCo .7r,, ,e- ' C is ., 59ccti1c ' t = C f a.=ah1 %! LAMS noon %�� Cl) K �- Cs ( •` h O i 7 J —4t F) ._. I tit I 1 D ,7 Z000' •000' TETRATECH INC ,, ( "Mb IUOL.UlfA.OUNEtP601NIg40DIEo! t60.fltl llttlEO.U/I INOPP UUi�i i t 08/29/06 ALS 1 OF 1 I SCALE. 1- = 2000' J08/ 80-5161.002.0, Figure 1 C 2 VICINITY MAP € ( } z- C i 0 II. CURRENT CONDITIONS A. Road Network i.., The site is traversed on the north by CR 28 and on the south by CR 26. CR 7 is adjacent to the north half of the site and 1-25 is adjacent to the site on the east. These i roadways are under Mead,Weld County and Colorado Department of Transportation ( p (CDOT) control. SH 119 and SH 66 are major east-west arterial roadways having regional signifi- ( . cance. They are four lane and two lane highways,t- L respectively, extending from ` Longmont to 1-25 and beyond in both directions. These regional roadways are cur- f rently accessed from the site using CR 7 or the combination of CR 7, CR 26, and CR i ' 5%. t All roadways in the immediate area of the site are two lane unpaved roadways. SH 66, SH 119, CR 5%, and CR 26 west of CR 5% are paved. Existing roadways and I (' geometry are shown on Figure 2. The intersection of CR 7 and SH 66 is under traffic (-) r t signal control with all other intersections stop sign controlled. it C 1 ( > B. Traffic Volumes C- ' U Recent traffic counts in the area of The Waterfront at Foster Lake were obtained for Fr C: both the morning and afternoon peak hours. Area peak hour and daily traffic is presented on Figure 3. As shown, negligible peak hour traffic currently exists on It nearby streets. Count tabulations are available in Appendix A. il. i `,' .,- ii (I 3 f i_ { 3 i » I /� - . �. » IV I. L••• -- •2• I | i C. V } y • d S - --....- — -»- } + + } • + S d S E . S S ( d } S ! S ( U 4- Jain ( Q ( S ! Q ` 1 /! QI2 rits(1.: fi _{ . m ,5 Num T [ ] ©` CURRENT ROADWAY GEOMETRY ( ` 4 | 9 . . . . . . . . .. �. ... ,- � i�■ O . ; -- • § }s, ^� | / 3 ( w -, RSV ; 6 99 . CR- ( d ■ ■■ &- ( S J\ `� } 1,1-'1 4 9■/ } ( ( t S W cR_ » iQ 10 Q ! a 5 [ ( S .___ ' 11|{ C]snag , � ( 11103-0 . y . r' , ! 2 .` !r d it set m { • a I . td § • ! 5 CURRENT TRAFFIC I ` • i ._l ...: iv '11 C. Operating Conditions I U All critical intersections were evaluated using current traffic loadings and roadway f ,- `' geometry. For evaluation purposes, desirable operations are defined as overall level- F : of-service(LOS)"D"or better at signalized intersections. At unsignalized locations, 1 level-of-service"E/F" is considered acceptable for critical left turn movements. Other f G ( movements should operate at level-of-service "D`or better. These levels-of-service i ( = are considered normal at stop sign controlled intersections during peak-hour condi- i� i tions. At off-peak times, significantly better operating conditions can be expected. t i r Both peak hour periods were analyzed y2ed using capacity analysis procedures and re- sufted in the operating levels-of-service(LOS)shown on Table 1. All traffic move- (, ments operate at level-of-service 'E'or better, while all intersections operate at level- a of-service"C"overall during both peak hour periods. Other intersections were not ( I investigated given the negligible amount of traffic at those intersections. Accordingly, (. acceptable operations are assumed at other intersections. Capacity work sheets are ill included in Appendix B F . Table 1 t-' CURRENT OPERATING CONDITIONS t . LEVEL OF SERVICE (_ Location Control Movement AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour SH66=CR7 Signal EB C C tr-, WB B B NB C C i ( > _ SB D D s Overall C C CR 28—CR 7 Stop NB LTR A A i -t SB LTR A A WB LTR A A ( i .l EB LTR A A ( SH 119-CR S% Stop EB L A C t r SBL F F SB R D C iI.1 , ., • I v. t f . ( r- ( iilk D. Surrounding Land Uses The area surrounding The Waterfront at Foster Lake is currently undeveloped. No other significant development exists in the area of the site; however, a number of major developments are planned. t III. FUTURE CONDITIONS t = kr 5 A. Development Assumptions 3 i t. The current development schedule anticipates groundbreaking as soon as practical ' with some 20 years required for build out of The Waterfront at Foster Lake. At this t ' time, a blend of residential land uses is anticipated. It is expected that the project will evolve as a blend of 1,268 single family residences, 375 mufti-family residences, and t a community center. The site will have an intemal circulation system consisting of local roadways with full movement connections to the adjacent street system. This access scheme will be supplemented by connections to both Kiteley Ranch and Mead Crossing. Construction will consist of three phases generally starting in the northwest t� corner of the site continuing to the east and then to the south. A preliminary schedule assumes Phase I (589 units)is developed in 2010, Phase it (446 units) is developed t by 2015, and Phase III(608)is developed by 2025. Phase III represents project build (''; out. This schedule is considered preliminary and is subject to change due to market c ( demands, financing, agency approvals, and other such factors. A concept plan for (); The Waterfront at Foster Lake is presented on Figure 4. There are two mixed use ` ( ("flex') areas, which will be either commercial or residential in the future. The mixture and amount of uses in these areas has not been determined and the developer Ll wishes to have the flexibility to match the market demand and interest. These areas ( have the potential for a variety of residential and/or commercial uses and will go through separate Final Plat and Site Plan Review processes. For purposes of this study, multi-family uses were assumed on those parcels. 7 .., I ( 1 `.- f ( i • i. . , I t L.-sit, Ly i. : gg ems Q . • • �h, q��Aq��• Iillidlllt� :J !. Cim moss El i bq •„ 0. illlll - �f►iil► :1j4 • SWO illllll �y �•� i 'C �• ss (%. unmW �E,k. , Inup : i t Y��i` ►tb ti=c �� YIY� i -- �E ♦♦♦..'q F 'JIIIIIIII® �� i 1 ili3/4 { e , •% {{{{1111111 Il1f 11111 O am ••• a is Sea .ittet� - Seat. : � ( glom ma i� /111 ♦,\\• rr, _ • Figure 4 I 7 8 CONCEPT PLAN I f.1 I ✓ i •gip8. site Traffic iv Site generated traffic was estimated using standard generation rates and procedures consistent with those presented in "Trip Generation, Seventh Edition'. This reference ( 7 is published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers(ITE)and is nationally recog- t l _ nized. Viz ; If While some internal trips will be realized within this development, no reduction was , assumed in this study. This resulted in a very conservative analysis, leaving room for t r future modifications to the development plan. Site traffic estimates are presented on ! r : Table 2 J j • Table 2 . SITE TRAFFIC ESTIMATES Daly AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Phase K Use Size Rate Trips Rate In Out Rate In Out I Single Faintly 284 D.U. 9.57 2,718 0.75 54 160 1.01 181 106 f , MultI-Family 305 D.U. 5.86 1,787 0.44 23 111 0.52 106 53 Sub-Total 4,505 77 271 287 159 C 1 II Single Family 376 D.U. 9.57 3,598 0.75 71 212 1.01 239 141 .> Multi-Family 70 D.U. 5.86 410 0.44 5 26 0.52 24 12 Sub-Total 4,008 76 238 263 153 III Single Family 608 D.U. 9.57 5,819 0.75 118 342 1.01 387 227 (! TOTAL 14,332 269 851 937 539 f .+ 3 As indicated above, The Waterfront at Foster Lake is expected to generate up to O t 1,120 morning peak hour trips, 1,476 afternoon peak hour trips, and 14,332 trips per day. Trips associated with the community center are considered insignificant for f i purposes of this study. f 'e { O If , e• r 9 t ! f i I ' C. Trip Distribution • +_> Trip distribution is a function of the origin and destination of site users, their work and shopping patterns and the available roadway system. In this case, major work, i; shopping and recreational areas am situated to the west and south of the site. This is f s consistent with current traffic patterns. Most, if not all, of the traffic will approach the site using SH 66 or SH 119. The estimated directional distribution of site traffic is i; shown on Figure 5. ( Site access is proposed via a number of access points providing direct or indirect access to the major street system. Primary access will be provided by several full E i movement intersections along CR 7 and CR 28 and connections to adjacent Bevel- opment. Anticipated morning and afternoon peak hour site traffic is shown on Figure . ( 6 for 2010, Figure 7 for 2015, and Figure 8 for 2025. These estimates reflect an expanding street system and access through other developments. IP , f ; t D. Background Traffic f ' Background traffic corresponding to Phase I (2010), Phase II (2015)and Phase III } (;-J (2025)was developed. This included a general increase in traffic plus traffic resulting from other nearby development. General increases in traffic were estimated using CDOT published growth rates on SH 66 and SH 119. There are numerous develop- ments planned within the area between SH 66 and SH 119 and from CR 5%to east of () 1-25. Background traffic and planned roadway improvements for each time frame are ft O sensitive to the traffic generated by other developments. Brief descriptions of as- sumed development activity and associated roadway improvements follow. -` t F } 10 I_ - f 3 ` dtiZIF l (• : � � ■ N ; 25% ! / M . . � ( y ( ) �,( {< ' S ( . y } Asik } G G d ( O ! y Nominal* } S $ an te , • Q ge 25%* ' ( C _m .%20A County Road awIplay a ��■� . traffic traveling west [ SITE TRAFFIC__ 9 - ( 9 ! t } .? iii t"1 / tt w (� 1 V VIZJI 1 1 2a70m s@gyr25'100 L Kiii s i {, r SH i6 ~ t ' t.ao d t....: C 0-25/10 W20-. �t-s t ( tr g I ..----,*Snot A 3 t O 11 / IC` ,sstrnt e 1 t70M0 e_ r3o2o i %(1 ₹ t r}E_ V RRgg ...---SCR 28 to i i - ri --- ± `'+ at-So/25 1O ) t r; , 10 CR 26172 t its C((_.S NMI --NM ��lll tr. .,? It ` CR26 to Y"' LE{,ENO: AMIPM Peek How tlo ' K3 off N a NmiilMl J r NOT@ Rdrs+sdbl\ss,srt5ltliWs- SH 118---11C-- Rims-# Liam `10 Rims i I / 12 2018 SITE TRAFFIC e0%M� 0-35/100 20/66..1 k.P t- ( )Cj 0/,s--0 t,0A0 IOH) �- NM SI5 tr �t � tr 1 Li gi ..2 III .iii ( SN66~ 11 bF ♦`\� • 1 ons ; \\ 6/25 a. 1 F..I `2S/10 1 !fns_ L5120 ; • 1 i : I r 01 r \\ 1 ss 'KJO t t: 3 ` �-yStreetA i \\\ t 1 t yt we • i C :E? T t ( ) C 1 111 , -( 'SCR 2e...--- ft - --- co to L215/145 [ l- ,t ,...:r-120/1110 (-' CR 26112 ( ) r f i 515m �NM r� if y 4 444. , LEGEND:AMIPM Peek N0/, . , CR26 s ` N.Nominal O NOTES: Rounded whiles. SIM bulk will also SS sIF O6.0/Mead Canning and r e new Y11 ssceens,CR 51l2b mass SNOS. SH 11$ 40/+0/1 at—moss:S FFe1Ne 7 1. F €v, • 13 2016 SITE TRAFFIC 1 I - , Ai_� • . ( ) 2 ----N\\ §1 dl r3tt l4 5 40/140-Ny j-30/95 p65J Lund 15150-0 1020 i5 1R4 25710 e-5/25( ) ti r L. K1± : K _ y\ )icy iir y ( ) SH66 ~ I ;„1„,i,,,, �j (" 5j '\t1çj i t I YY l.,f •25/,0 I 2ono5J ,520 \ SR5J L4 tr 't 1 0:1rNno_.,_ dic.‘.. , lc( ( ( .......:_fic :............): k.-70140 ' ; , \\� :\\ iltill ' ` jiO2G I \ r 3 -- Ct ...c f:1 0 , SI F I 1 S zt 2 . of ao n CR28 = 4rit 0 J 1 € , i r , '" Is t,5>5„ao j ,r 110/95 ..•.. € t ' 5/20-1, ir-15/50 5Ib ,0 �"� CR 26112 I) 4-- I C_ �t1 O i IlC i co L3 45/,30—. t—�O,25 l € C. P� * ,05� 'i°r 25/,5-� 4—Saso I#1 a I d- $ 3,251/4:_b-40 r14o� ,rrura%(i CR 26 .` 1 _ ( LEGEND: MYPM Pak Hour `✓ " NOTES: Randal brand 51wHdx. ) $hs Naval Mao use SYMIF NsNa�YW Ohm Mad Craning rM Oho Mw SH118 541J t Sa% ^NCR 512b 6N t5. I O14 2n6 ant TRAFFIC i ( O It is assumed that Kiteley Ranch and Liberty Ranch will be fully developed by 2010. Traffic from these developments was added directly into background traffic; however, some turning vehicles associated with Liberty Ranch were transferred from the CR 7 I intersection with SH 66 to the new CR 5% intersection with SH 66. These vehicles i I { were mostly associated with the retail area within Liberty Ranch. CR 5%is assumed • i ti built within Liberty Ranch but not to the south. Additionally, some 10% of Adler Estates was assumed developed. { I! 5 [ t. 72015 5 jj t \,l ( By 2015,Adler Estates was assumed fully developed as were the new high school and Mead Crossing. Additionally,the CR 28 underpass under 1-25 was assumed ( available as indicated in the St Vrain Lakes Development traffic impact study. CR 5'% • E was assumed built south of Liberty Ranch with a connection to CR 7,just north of CR 28. CR 5%was also assumed built to the north of SH 66. Additional development within the St. Vrain Lakes Development is expected by 2025. This increased development resulted in additional traffic using the CR 28 underpass. Traffic using F ( � sing the and erpass in 2025 was estimated at twice the traffic using the under- pass in 2015. Since there will be a limited number of attractions on the west side of O 1-25 that can be easily accessed using the State highway system, the underpass is (I expected to serve a limited function. Traffic going west on CR 28 will likely turn south (3 on CR 7 and connect.with CR 26. CR 26 is likely to be the selected alignment since f there are a number of obstructions along other routes. The CR 7—CR 28 intersection I ' will need traffic signals to accommodate westbound to southbound left-turning vehi- r U. cies. 3 (.: S 1 O ICI 1• s V 15 } (..' 1z"-- Ia Adjustments were made to reflect a changing and expanding street system within the } _ study area. This effort considered a larger study area than related to this specific t project. Consequently, shifting traffic pattems and the availability of multiple travel routes were considered. At a number of locations, peak hour traffic was reduced to reflect the transfer of traffic movements to alternate routes. Improvements identified t 4 f " In the individual traffic impact + 3 studies for each development were considered available t ` in the indicated time frames. In some instances, however, the expanded street system will mitigate congestion levels by providing alternate travel routes. , Figure 9 presents 2010 background traffic, Figure 10 presents 2015 background traffic and Figure 11 presents 2025 background traffic. It should be noted that traffic estimates for 2025 are best considered an"order of magnitude"rather than precise r : k. estimates given the number and size of future developments, an expanded street system and significant changes in area traffic patterns_ ake r, E. Future Total Traffic € Total traffic, the combination of site traffic and background traffic,was developed for (.` each phase of development. Total traffic for 2010. 2015, and 2025 is shown on Figures 12, 13, and 14, respectively. O { F. Future Roadway System ( 1 I (3 Major roadway widening and intersection improvements are expected by the 2010, f f 2015, and 2025 time frames. These improvements are needed to accommodate regional traffic growth, other development traffic, and expansion of the area street t ' system to serve future traffic demands are generally defined below. i i 16 1 CJ 3 l ( , • I ; 111; c as, �. eennJ i oin f,..) i k ' s$onao-. .—rowan i . sonw-\ 35170 I `_` tg'`" � . • I i i 4 ; r k i k_. it' i 1 ( I; (Nj i Cs.,e, )1 ellty, ( i ,i, ii, \ ,19 CR 28 U f l_\ E t-1 S i { CR2612 t_1 O K NM-• �-NRi tr4 s "4T `� )j l 0 Mt-s is5 )I cc) CR26 f ; LEGEND AM'PM Peek Now i r � tJ it N:Nanial (.i ' NOTE Raided breast 5 wham. RN 119e` ,32N2150-+ 4-2235/111 •' �` ..# 2010 BACKGROUND TRAFRC 17 ` | / • - ! « - �. • _�§ , tI \\ 1I 115 �t : i ■ | t k '••..... %III I ( i ®® IQ 12 ` d ! d ! ( : Fb ( ! S { d . { .. Q ak 5/5-* \ �-ca a i 4-5/5 70/75 I |� - ( G %.,:§A } 1 / | Q �CRam I .... ,, ( G re is ! 2 ■ 5/5 ni � 15 *-._ k l | �_, ! C | / ..- |§ * : »a LEGEND: ___ { % I2 ■ ®Nominel % ��g m _._._. e,_�� ; . • iEli Fieur0l ( / 2 _�_ 1 ‘-' ' ! S • . . .. . . . i l i I i. (. 01011015 4-1o651u7 i 'Ili i ' , SH66 13 i k i Iit E t t r - ₹ (1 i f } f ', I 13CR26 2ono � sWC ifi ^a f -' CR 261/2 N. i () rTh --riE ( n !} gon25—I, ,-270/185 IL 5/200 X07 O-2` It-120/76t..i: ` a T..2 10 ig- r�5/35 3 \ dRf8 \ t r� O CR26 t \ N gI ( i ND: RAW Risk Now f yE O g N-Nominal t t NOTE: Rounded b newest i hides. f ' i 1 SH 119 aatao� � E - `` (2J 35013$20.-4. 4-2675128 1 Ram11 i v 2025 BACKGROUND TRAFRC 19 I � � 4 � , ! IC , �_, , w ' _ n - �_ ~ - |! y ... . e■� / CI _ h is �25/10 2045-0 _ f } tr 10125(Ai ,. 4_� , | - � r.-gzE ( ( J� �It-_ | d ! -- ®- ( S � � �_e _ 9 ) d | r 1 ( K & / © . Q I' Si I7- 0 § c.28 ! d _ ! Q ...e.( Q KIM.1 E [ S ( / ,aa n | © ! b ! > . _—+ �_ |■ [ _, 1 { yam r2i'ift / |■ ! ( ) - [ 2 A■ [ G _m ___ [ _ | di NOTE Rounded.roost.vehicles, {ii 132012150-o 4-2235/1115 12 d 2018 TOTAL I 20 TRAFRC | / ! « i el I Lr i1 r turn U29M5J� � Y3tt pt t 10/30 tOH01 t5/5 [ I- � ^05/3 0 124366--• 4 .-NM O 1 u \\Ji ..... L-3II is i - , -xi,!I l : SH 66 \ ' Ji' \ ` N\i it 5 (.) X 10 I 100240-4 15/20 `, 7x175-► 6--210215 .-2I5lM3 1 1 1 it , 8 K.... 1 • rk z • • o • �� 1 • i , ; i t) ....•a I • 1 1 1 ( t 1 itSei U \ O �, i 1 ii i � CR26 j t NS-- �pry50 C) 4015� 90,210 I 11 r'r� k (> as I IN. -----\\ C1 CR26112 s 1 1 :. xr iE. 95/230—4 4-270255 I (.S 2015—+ 4-10/10 !(0-135/45 5157 r10M CO 1700/65 1\ / �.; \\11 //// r - t i K il 1 (-I CR 26 ‘I,C 0 LEGEND:AMIPN Perk Hour I ; rill N.Nominal (.> a NOTE Rounded to 11411•113 vuNdet 4 F 1 8H 116�`` 236#315- 70 16162625-+ �-27261,97( g# / F16M1.1a 1 +� / 21 ` 2015 TOTAL TRAFNC J a I O It- I el i l rill '1i I `dun 2o/6J� Y` 15/50)Kilt -#rairt t5/10 t 701722211sT 0-1/30/310 2151656-4 4.-410/406 100/370-. 21365 c°jiiji � 16 li$ /3, t `; -( i SH66 ~ � I ICII) li• 525} �% s5sin-%,rzsrwi r''- t (1) e ~ 055 I epp$ 1 r ill &beaA } ; 1 I. N\ "---/,• • 1 �Saeet t3 1 • wta� 114/5 •\ .v t 1115690 4-3701365 N� \ S O--3O20 I 2 \ ilfr i_ i Q 1 �{ t 1 �� U 1 Ll i S not 11000 O! `. of G 3000 s f CR 28 x 1a1o1 1i CO taro—. � i3oe° { 66150.7 el (230215 R (' �P 1751425--► ��2 .5♦ 2070 15150 �j f c ≥ N O CR 26 1/2 I 7000, 1601425-4 e-260/305 f'.x / 5/5Th rN/N ( \\'\.........________21 3 iS �� ` 'R. it 1 0 t O 215635-4 4--3001310 1 to 30/10Th (-325/250 k-205/1 1 O 4 gggt Qr 00a43-4 s-2,0,150 F7 35/140Th 1rwN 4, r ` ~ o f ( ) CR 26 `` 12000 Fi Y It LEGEND: AM/PM Peek Hour 10 III Coaeo-fi �°� CI / 8 N NamiW `-?Ei Ilk 8H 110 R`` ► 4-3575tH NOTE Rounded b nwut 5 waliaes. Rpm 14 6 2025 TOTAL TRAFFIC•i (' 1 -- i I i 2010 Bald CR 7 from SH 66 to CR 28 to a three-tame roadway adjacent to development. xv Build Intersection improvements at the SH 66—CR 7 i intersection in conjunction with the Kiteley and Liberty Ranch n { � developments, tEf Budd CR 5'%, south of SH 66, as part of Liberty Ranch. ( 2015 Widen SH 66 to a four-lane arterial street. c ' Build CR 5'%from Liberty Ranch to CR 7. (,) 2025 Widen SH 119 to six lanes. Expand the area street system consistent with regional ( planning documents. ( C Site specific improvements related to the development of The Waterfront at Foster (,) Lake will be determined in the following sections of this report. ` ( ; IV. TRAFFIC IMPACTS in order to assess operating conditions with The Waterfront at Foster Lake fully developed, highway capacity analysis procedures were utilized at key intersections. 4 { These are: 1)the SH 119—CR 5'%intersection; 2)the SH 66—CR 7 intersection, 3) the CR 7—CR 28 intersection; 4)the CR 7—CR 2634 intersection, and, 5)primary f site access intersections. Analyses were undertaken for all time frames; however, an 1O intersection was only investigated if it served critical site traffic movements. ( At the onset of these undertakings, traffic was reviewed at each location to identify the need for additional auxiliary lanes or an upgrade in intersection control. Findings are ff ( = documented in the following sections. r 23 is . I ', i I C) I ,..3�1 \ A. Future Roadway Features I i , , Z .12 : t { I ? The following auxiliary lanes and traffic control improvements are needed in 2010 at I ` ' the indicated intersections. These are based upon CDOT's State Highway Access t' `i } Code criteria for NR B roadways, a 40 mile per hour speed limit, and the "Manual on ti Y Uniform Traffic Control Devices". Improvements at the CR 7 and CR 5%intersections ( with SH 66 are needed in conjunction with the Liberty Ranch and Kiteley Ranch i i _i developments. I i, i CR 7—SH 66 Northbound and southbound left-and right-turn lanes and ''s 0 an eastbound right-turn lane. CR 51/2—SH 66 Bufld intersection with all auxiliary lanes. (_ CR 7—Street A A southbound left-tum lane. • ( ) ( 's CR 7—Street B A southbound left-turn lane. ID CR 7—CR 28 A southbound left tum lane. Roadway geometry and traffic controls for 2010 are shown on Figure 15. Building CR 7 to a three lane roadway adjacent to the Waterfront at Foster Lake site will provide t the needed left turn lanes. A three lane roadway section is also considered reason- s ; E0 able for CR 28 adjacent to development. With this section a left-turn lane will be I U provided along CR 28 even though it will not be warranted at this time. C} 0 Capacity analyses were undertaken to assess 2010 operating conditions with Phase I (` of The Waterfront at Foster Lake, Kiteley Ranch and Liberty Ranch fully built, 10%of i ( Adler Estates built, and regional traffic growth. Resultant operating conditions are j t , shown on Table 3 with capacity work sheets available in Appendix C. It should be 1 U noted that operating conditions were assessed to the level needed to show represen- ( tative conditions and therefore, additional 'tweaking' is expected to result in improved 1 L operations. Primary or major site access intersections were fully evaluated with minor site intersections determined acceptable based on review. i 0 24 it ' i P \_r c ! ( ' z� dl� IIZI ED-1/4 w r) _..0 sit_ 1. , )1P ' ; sass~ i , lit* It 1 1 , 1 •' 1 1 E ( ; ,- BMW A j , l > I F l 1 i 11 \ 1 \ { j is �.Sasa`a % e>- ' 1 I cty , 1 O I SIT • 44 al _ � + e - { ; + (-' CR 261/2 €• / f (j Ve7 I CR 26 i () I (I) F f y LI Sa11945.........all —. .— Flouts 1s �i 0 ` — 25 2019 ROADWAY GEOMETRY 1 i-.i ( '; i0 (mg Table 3 { r 2010 OPERATING CONDITIONS(WITH PROJECT) LEVEL OF SERVICE Location Control Movement AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour O SH 66-CR 7 Signal EB B C in WB B D I , NB D D ('-q SB D D i CI Overall C D (,`5 CR 28-CR 7 Stop NB LTR A A SBL A A t i (s WBL A B ( ) WBTR A A I C.i EB LTR A B G SH 119-CR 5% Signal EB A A I (_- WB C A SB D C W Overall B A I ( CR 7-B Street Stop SBL A A 1O WB LR A A 1 ( } CR 28-D Street Stop EB L A A i0 SBLR B B O As shown above, all intersections are expected to operate acceptably. l (1 `h 0 2015 (3 €, Construction of CR 28 thro ugh ugh The Waterfront at Foster Lake is expected as devel- (, opment continues to the east. Additionally, it appears that an eastbound right-turn (; lane will be needed on CR 28 at Street F. By 2015, the high school is assumed bukt E c; and will drive roadway improvements at the CR 28—CR 26% intersection. It is I /(/ expected that CR 7 and CR 26%will be built as three lane roadways with all tum O I 0 lanes at the intersection of these two roads. SH 119 will be reaching traffic levels e O 26 Ltj. i (�t E , ; IIIrequiring the addition of another through lane in each direction. This widening was f assumed completed by 2015. i ) . 0 s ( ‘, Intersection operations were evaluated with additional nearby development, the i ( Improvements associated with those developments, and Phase II of The Waterfront at t , Foster Lake. Peak hour traffic projected for 2015 was loaded onto the 2015 street , system shown on Figure 16. Future operating conditions are shown below. . i �,. Table 4 =-: 2015 OPERATING CONDITIONS(WITH PROJECT) I im LEVEL OF SERVICE ' Location Control Movement AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour SH 66-CR 7 Signal EB C C { Pb WB C D t NB D D t SB D D i iiiOverall C D t CR 28—CR 7 Stop NB LTR A A t Fr SB L A A WBL C D xf } WBTR B B ( EB LTR B C SH 119-CR S% Signal EB C D (s WB D D € ( SB E C (, Overall D D I (s CR 7—B Street Stop SB L A A t ( E WB LR B B k ( CR 28 -D Street Stop EB L A A I O SB LR B B I ` ) CR 28—F Street Stop EB L A A E ( '• WBL A A i 4,-,,F _ it )t) NB LTR B B {j SB LTR A A imp I 27 Ii lb $ I ( i JlL A 0 N J sH66 i \ t3 t \\ a COi ;�Nr ; i s �' E 1 I 0 ��---b....9060A A ; \\ ; , 1 e �'�► N 0)•- 1 ; ,� 1l ip f t , F CR26 , �' 44 is ; ( + et ) 1 c) r' f *1 4- E..' CR 261/ —1 O R 1 ( Eeer-- i f { ...---'7 1 ricy i E CR26 ; it 4 C t t{/ -) J ts 9H119 -r e �— ~ f— Boue 16 CI 28 2016 ROADWAY GEOMETRY R ) 1k I-) i l 1 0 i As indicated, acceptable conditions are expected provided the identified improve- i ments are available. Capacity work sheets are available in Appendix D. I Li 4 n p \ j f i,. In the long-term, a second southbound left turn lane will be needed on CR 5%at SH U 119. Additionally,traffic signals will be needed at the CR 7—CR 28 intersection. t Approach geometry improvements will likely be needed in conjunction with signalize- C. tion. An eastbound right him lane will also be needed on CR 26% at Street I. Road- (i way geometry and controls in 2025 are shown on Figure 17. ( ' s { I Total traffic in 2025 was loaded onto the 2025 roadway system to assess future ( 1 operations. Resultant levels of service are shown on Table 5. • ' Table 5 (._) 2025 OPERATING CONDITIONS(WITH PROJECT) ₹ LEVEL OF SERVICE Location Control Movement AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour ( SH 66-CR 7 Signal EB C C C., _ WB C D t• NB C C SB C D C { Overall C C CR 28—CR 7 Stop NB LTR D C ( I SBL C C WBL B B WBTR C C EBLTR C C SH 119- CR 5% Signal EB A D WB r" D D SB D D ( Overall C D OCR 7—B Street Stop SBL A A WBLR B B 1 ili IF,1 29 [ I3 fU e : j"1 10 Table 5 2025 OPERATING CONDITIONS (WITH PROJECT) LEVEL OF SERVICE t `—' Location Control Movement AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour C CR 28—D Street Stop EB L A A SBLR B B i ( ' CR 28-F Street Stop EB L A A € t WBL A A NB LTR B C t , SB LTR B B ( 1 CR 7-CR 26% Stop SB L A B WBL E E WBR i B C CR 26%-I Street Stop WB LT A A , NBLR B B is 4 tI ca As shown, all intersections will continue to operate acceptably. Capacity work sheets are in Appendix E. i_ (' VI. CONCLUSIONS ( Based on the analyses and investigations described above, the following can be , concluded: a �: € O 4_• • Current operating conditions are acceptable in the area of The Waterfront at i .w Foster Lake site. ( , t • The proposed development will add significant but manageable traffic to the (1/4 area street system. At build out, this development will generate 1,120 morning _; U peak hour trips, 1,476 afternoon peak hour trips and 14,332 daily trips. H i c 30 ii ( 1 k_ i n , m r- cap_ Eletseit) f ( 1 $H 66 1 \` 1 I • 1 1 • 1 \ r • (.."Th I t (KAO. i ) i Kit* .. OAS I t 1 1 1 t %F Shoet A ; 1 1 • .i 1 direst 8 It �I r •\�\ \` N I li • e ( 1 ty i , € , 1 lc D Si A `\ N. .........--% `"SCR 28 _ C -� � CO Ff Mr -resc-- I0 V ( i I .J CR 26112 ;- [ [ 1� EA ,� t0 Vey e� , 'Y' € e Fc, 1) r Ktr a t ' CR26 ti 'g (J al 119 * L—'► 4— Flews 17 v 2026 ROADWAY GEOMETRY \ 31 _ • r U C `3 • • CR 7 and CR 28 should be twat with one lane in each direction plus a painted It center left-turn lane adjacent to development and extended as development 4 + proceeds. t_ ,i ( 3 • CR 26% should be(wilt to three lanes adjacent to the high school and taper to 3 t a residential street as it enters The Waterfront at Foster Lake development t ' E f • Auxiliary lanes will be needed at the site access points with the various phases 3 ( of this development. Appropriate roadway geometry and controls are shown l on Figures 15, 16, and 17. • The Waterfront at Foster Lake is viable from a traffic engineering perspective. ( t With implementation of the identified improvements,the traffic impacts of The Water- ` (' front at Foster Lake,other develo pment, and a general growth in regional traffic can be fully mitigated. These improvements will facilitate acceptable operating conditions for the foreseeable future. € tir i O f 0 F 0 f") V-1 (0 F Fi 5 0 i [[.i t F x i 3 i IP 32 y! `J s- i .• \ It I) r APPENDIX A tf ) I 0 } S 3 Iti t } ; (3 l O r" O C) E � j O O F _f i (( i y I in I ( ) Rocky Mountain Counts, LLC. 1 I ti 1108 Ctlerty Ct. Ft. Lupton, CO 80621 File Name : SH66CR7AM Ph (303)641-0445 F.(303)857-9191 Site Code :00000000 Start Date :5/12/2006 Page No : 1 I iu I 1st 7 - Pb+N_d-tMtl d CR 7 X186 Westbound Northbound I t j i Star • 1 Psd App. LM4 Thr Rip Pd App. taw lit Rip Pad App. k4tt Thr Pad I App. tali Tins u ht Total u ht s Ts$ k Total p ht Tout Tail 3 i.s'" ! Psotor to 1A to 1. 1.0 1.0 1D 1.0 1D 1.0 1.0 1. [0 1.0 1. . 1.0 I07:00 AM 4 0 34 1 126 0 0 126 1 6 0 2 0 133 142 j 307 I 07:15AM 5 1 40 46 2 157 0 0 159 1 2 0 3 6 162 168 376 l ' E 07:30 AM 2 1 40 43 1 180 2 0 183 0 1 2 3 8 140 145i' 377 c l 07:45 AM 3 1 29 33 1 156 2 0 159 1 0 3 4 14 141 155' 351 1 ( ) Taut 14 3 139 156 5 621 4 0 630 4 3 5 12 i 37 576 6131 1411 i (i` 08:00 AM 2 3 28 33 1 143 6 0 150 1 3 1 5 11 116 127 315 08:15 AM 4 1 22 27 1 105 1 0 107 0 0 1 1 3 156 159 294 } ( ) 0&30AM 0 0 15 15 2 122 0 0 124 0 2 2 4 15 79 1 95 238 08:45 AM 2 2 29 33 0 104 1 0 105 0 0 1 1 12 108 0 120, 259 f ( Total 8 6 94 108 4 474 6 0 496 1 6 5 11 41 459 1 501j 1106 ( Total 22 9 233 0 264 9 105 12 0 1116 5 8 10 0 23 78 705 1 1114 2517 i '' Appreh% 8.3 3.4 88 0.0 0.8 1.1 0.0 27 8 8 0.0 7.0 01 O. c ( Total% 0.9 0.4 9.3 0.0 10.5 0.4 4 5 0.5 0.0 44.3 02 0.3 0.4 0.0 0.9 3.1 4 0.0 0. 44.3 ( 1 1 acr : f`f i' t.S 1 4 I E. I O i F 1 1 3 C,1 4 -rt t i g fit; W : ; ' ;: i a t:} A r 0 3 t f 1 �� i {3 ti t r lbw Potts I ( I Out t T.u) i al at I U 111 ii 1 ) ( ) Rocky Mountain Counts, LLC. (") 1106 Cherry Ct Ft. Lupton, CO 80621 File Name :SH66CR7AM Ph (303)641-0445 F.(303) 857-9191 Site Code : 00000000 ( Start Date : 5/12/2006 Page No :2 I CR7 8H66 CR7 I 51166 (...t i Southbound Westbound SWt laR TM 1 App.olal Let AP0. Left n Northbound' P+d MP. , TAr APV. Im (.-.j Peak Harr From C760AAtb06: • T PWc1�1u M • T•bl u M • TaW u It • TaW Topll { Internal07:15 AM on ( ) Volume 12 6 137 0 155 5 636 10 0 651 3 6 6 0 15 39 659 0 0 596! 1419 € f Parted 7.7 3.9 6a 0.0 0.8 % 1S 0.0 0 0 0 0.0 6.5 0.0 0.0 ( ' V0 n:ia 2 1 40 0 43 1 180 2 0 183 0 1 2 0 3 8 140 0 0 1461 377 pt FPeak actor 0.941 (. High kit d7:1S AM 07'.,10 AM 06:00 AM 07:15 AM I Volume 5 1 40 0 46 1 160 2 0 183 1 3 1 0 5 6 162 0 0 166 i 4 Peak 0.64 0.66 0.75 0.89 Factor 2 9 0 0 O �..' oil Ta1M rol in t 2101 Ri 1 4 ED I � ( ) r b10ee Ma90 AM yy�� g i W little 5 5 i (..;r 1e•.aa.a ri Cs I' r, t ) ( I ; i `-1 E ) t 41 I re € t tea n.e teal I `ti 0 0.1171- 7-14;4T I Cr1 t ( ) I .1 h ii t I (=' i (" E ...i 1 I ' Rocky Mountain Counts, LLC. O 1106 Cherry Ct. Ft. Lupton, CO 80621 File Name :SH66CR7PM Ph (303) 641-0445 F.(303) 857-9191 Site Code : 00000000 .. Start Date : 5/11/2006 f l { 86 ' i 7 sift Printed-Unsigned Page No : i I NorthbCR ound ad ou I ., � 6a+6ibgnd YYaatliaM Ea49fouM I .., I Stettin* tart 11w Wahl Tai tat Thrppu Right t w Len Thu Tow U6 TMu Right Tots la Tai { i Fodor 0446PM 1 ii 6 13 to 13 22 1O i59 182 fir 1.o 0 10 T4 4 1�0 115o 10 179, 367• 04:15 PM 4 2 11 17 1 152 3 166 0 4 0 4 20 171 0 191 I 366 i t_.i 04x0 PM 0 0 14 14 1 156 4 191 3 0 0 3 33 159 2 194 402 0445 PM 2 0 14 16 3 158 4 165 1 1 0 2 18 151 0 1691 352 (-': total 12 5 62 69 5 465 14 874 5 4 13 91 610 2 733 I 0489 1 (, 0540 PM 2 2 24 26 0 183 4 187 2 0 2 29 109 1 139 I 356 I .... 05:15 05:15 PM 4 2 22 28 1 175 1 In 2 1 3 39 212 2 253 461 t . 05:30 PM 1 3 11 15 1 192 4 197 2 0 2 43 147 1 191 405 05:45 PM 0 2 9 11 0 161 4 186 1 1 2 41 138 1 180 358 1 Tool 7 9 66 42 2 711 13 726 7 2 9 182 806 6 783 1580 'r t_; Grand Total 19 14 118 151 7 1366 27 1400 12 6 22 243 1246 7 1496! 3069 I t Appnfi% 12.6 9.3 78.1 0.5 97.6 1.9 18. 54.5 27.3 162 83.3 0.5 i 6 Total% 0.6 0.5 3.8 4.9 02 44.5 0.9 45.6 0. 0.4 0.2 0.7 79 404 0.2 48.7 Oa MI Tad s I k. i �1 1 G F (_ I (_ I . ,_s . r ti D I W >z 1 r 4 r6 ii 10 ti C tr Vic, 41 T r I ( ) € ill EU tt 3 CR7 i �( , i O , , u I -i Rocky Mountain Counts, LLC. U' 1108 Cherry Ct. s• Ft. Lupton, CO 80621 File Name : SH66CR7PM Ph (303)641-0445 F.(303) 857-9191 Site Code : 00000000 I { f Start Date : 5/11/2006 Page No : 2 7 i_i SR S3 9. 1 Tom. t 7 Northbound J __ f ��A LM 'Mull Ltotal I 1� �.M 'bm Right AFR �.w� !CT `yl+y...y�n_I^• APP- Int T ! £ l .; Peak Hour 04 PM05:46 1 . 1bl MY , Teal I t..- Intmlion 05:00 PM i t i. Volume 7 9 66 82 2 711 13 726 0 7 2 91 152 606 5 763' 1580 i Percent 9.5 11.0 00.5 0.3 97.9 1.9 0.0 77.8 22.2 119.9 71.4 0.7 I E...�? Volume 4 2 22 28 1 175 1 177 0 2 1 3 39 212 2 253' Volu 461 (-) Peck Factor 0.857 High Mt 05:00 PM 05:30 PM 05:15 PM i s 't Vol me 2 2 24 28 1 192 4 197 0 2 1 3 39X212 2 253 E 1.� Peak Factor 0.732 0.921 't - 0.750 0.754 (+ t i (' W •k Tam r—rm EMI I (_% 1 ( 1 4 (_ i (\..; i i t €._7 .--1 a -721-twka (:) €qi l (' 4, ? r Olea her ( ? aaaala� 1 1ei e t Tel 5d Tam / CRT L, I () I (-) P 11111 i ` a # EJ 1 (,; i Center buttes L Cods : 1 ?101: 3 (,7UO: 11-7 flit: ICVC121 Dust: tt-21 : kraals y: Vehicle DM: 2/23/16 4 ..«.«..».. ....«_.«....___.« �............. __....._._ [ fi ` 1111 MOD 1IILIfII 101 TB K1I0/: 6:30 II - 1:31 II I DIBCIIII SNIT MI II ►01111$ ... lIIt11t6 ... i MI NIL IOU IlCt01 lint his Left total lfllt tin Left lath 6:30 IN 1.51 I 3 4 7 I 43 51 I (' last 5:30 11 0.51 0 6 1 7 I 16 14 Intl 7:1511 1.63 1 1 1 11 10 II 11 I (' hat 6:65 IN 0.13 1 7 3 10 0 70 30 ! i ' Satire Isterseetioe € # Iorti f:5S II 1.51 0 4 3 7 0 S7 43 r...4 t_> Gut 0.63 0 4 1 5 0 /I 21 $ Intl 0.51 1 6 1 I 12 75 12 i r i lest 0.13 I 7 3 10 0 70 30 z CR-7 r..---41._ µ4 N f — II—F-13 c Y jF l_; _ "z.. t ate. 1's`.0 4 it CI. ---31-r----- i 7 0 ` r 5 c x_.' �rS-s a�x' € _ CR-28 I ` 5 4 1 i4 L 3 1 f.I ( if' 7 10 CR-28 :1 - ( : 0 , 1 6 1 Illi 5 w 1 _ _ __ , E ( ,__ CR-7 r -. SL touter Snares cm): I NCI: 1 � I: Cl-1 NU: 1C17C121 I CI-21 Noraab It: lelieles Ihtt: 2/21/11 e ( Pill ntl40u167NI0 !OtlRPtli00: 4:01 n - 6:10n 1U I • IRLCTIOI NW nu tl *001 t .... Ptttglt ... . flog MI101t ?ACTOR tint tire kit total lint lire Left i t 1 i', North 4:11 n 0.51 6 6 2 14 .43 13 14 tut S:N Pt I.5$ 3 7 1 11 21 64 9 I f 0ostt 4:11 II 0.75 2 1 2 12 11 67 17 .`• Nut 4:15 II 1.67 0 4 4 1 0 S0 SO : ' lithe Ietetuctiot North 4:31 n 0.69 4 5 2 11 36 45 11 I i • tut 1.35 1 6 I 7 14 16 0 1 C , Saetl 1.75 2 I 2 12 17 67 17 € Nest 0.41 1 1 1 4 0 SO SO 1 { . Y -' TTa F ( CR-7/ ft, _ 4 5 2 ' 11 1 ; CEffe:-..74:4- 7'AY r to -- CR-28 ' C• F 1 L 4 0 II I .U ... .........: I I 4 8 CR-28 E P. f ; 0 12 � t � U 4 r- ,C .. 2 8 1 2 3 €€ % SLS I'1 S.. CR-7 L k` [ 1 I l (_) Rocky Mountain Counts, LLC. 14. 1106 Cherry Ct. Ft. Lupton, CO 80621 File Name : SH119CR5AM Ph (303)641-0445 F.(303) 857-9191 Site Code : 00000000 I e; r Start Date : 5/12/2006 etra-uns86rd Page No : 1 Groups P 4 ',--'1 CRS 1/2 SR 112 SN119 I ( r salt Tine tan sa.Rrip�M.'° co.reed Thy Westbou1.0nd Eastbound O 1 Fodor 1.0 l.0 1.0Ri lt MAP.Toed 11.9 Tiro• A a.> Int. I 07:O0AM 12 13 25 403 10 413 pi 2850 290 726 f 07:15 AM 15 26 41 436 8 444 3 273 276 761 0730 AM 16 29 45 506 11 517 3 263 286 648 I t..y' ___ 07:45AM 11 26 36 648 14 562 5 260 285 8� tout a4 96 150 1893 43 1936 18 1119 1139 3225 1 � ,; 0S:00 AM 13 24 37 432 5 222 227' 696 E 06:15 AM 7 19 26 7317 26 343 13 242 255 624 06:70 AM 15 24 319 29 348 6 216 222 609 1 ? 00:15 AM 4 15 19 !16 8 326 17 261 606 Toed 39 82 121 1377 72 1449 41 Carl 965 2535 I �'t E Grand Toed 93 176 271 3270 115 3385j 59 2043 2102 5758 Apprch% 34.3 65.7 96.6 3A 2.8 97.2 "v { Toed% 1.6 3.1 4.7 56.8 2.0 58.8 1.0 35.5 36.5 { [ Cab V1 i.- W In Tad 1 174J E}i1 I 445J 91• . of l7 W ` i 4 €. C �)o (_4 4 as I ?205E7PDA5AY �t ( ' --- f 2/2006 846:00 Ma 'o i f (l P 1O C3 t 0 '-I ( Ri 0 f ill , t# t % i in i . , Rocky Mountain Counts, LLC. i C 1106 Cherry Ct. Ft. Lupton, CO 80621 File Name : SH119CR5PM ill Ph (303)641.0445 F.(303) 857-9191 Site Code : 00000000 : r_ - Start Date : 5/10/2006 t Page No : 1 mita P I f r cR 5112 Periled- 1119 &1119 I (;� I Right Time Lett T A Litlir App.TOM k t.Tow , actor 1.0 1,p App.-Teed Thu1. 1 free.Total 1 b 04:0D PM 9 9 18 255 25 310 ¶6 356 374 702 04:15 PM 6 13 10 322 9 331 8 mo 7es 748 o1:m PM 7 9 16 312 14 �32q60D X18 416 434 �777�5 I t i — 0/.4y� 14 3042 g 1308 54 1357 12 1501 14� 3085 "S Teed E , 0510 PM 11 9 20 355 11 386 18 464 4821 868 t C 05:15 PM 3 14 17 365 13 378 21 472 403 888 3 05:30 PM 5 21 26 263 106 371 28 166 163 880 `% 06:16 PM 11 19 30 321 10 331 X�22 �86 MO 751 Tatl 30 63 03 1304 142 1446 89 1759 1048 3387 % () Geed f.-; Total 86 105 1711 2607 196 2503+ 161 3350 3511 6485 € i ' App¢h% 38.6 81.4 93.0 7.0 4.6 95.4 Tula,% 1.0 1.6 2.6 40.2 3.0 432 2.5 51.7 54.1 Cabin S C 3 (ill efffitel 4 t kJ • L,-; t; T �� ,l... ��J{ It��9pe�JJt{�'J Mw�1 = q II 1 i i ee,4.5 �uI Will € F, c l..j i ( 1 e ; 4 f-1 tJ 1 ( ) ial S a! l I U "-3 Iii Rocky Mountain Counts, LLC. r 1106 Cherry Ct Ft. Lupton, CO 80621 File Name : SH119CR5PM r0 Ph (303)641-0445 F.(303)857-9191 Site Code : 00000000 fr Start Date : 5/10/2006 ( Page No : 2 IC i .y. I CR 5112 SH 119 SH 119 }t t Stem Yens I 4Q J 1 J Soultbound Eastbound App TAM T1ru 1 t n I Ma.TOM lA I T1 Ana.TOM Int.MS I ' Peak Mem From 84.11{33666 PM b 05:48 PM-Paid a' Narsseton 0045 PM I { -' *I . 33 55 66 1367 138 1505 95 1820 1915! 3506 I ( y Psrasat 37.5 62.5 90.8 02 5.0 95.0 05:15 Vane 3 14 17 365 13 378 21 472 4931 666 Peak Fader 0.980 HON. 05:30 PM 04:45 PM 05:15 PM 1 Voksns 5 21 26 384 6 390 21 472 493 Peak Fedor 0.846 0.965 0.971 it % Outut am tali i ( + ® In i nit I t k , 4 Y k-, 3 i U F i a €, F. ��y, I dig —' a— i ' F t F . 1 � Hi IO E It i () I i_ 1 ` ' i t I - () Silk ➢IIP 1O I ( 1 | d ) Lei .q ti } / APPENDIX B ( ( t 2 ( � Q : Q . U S S ( Q S d S I | ( I0 | ki | d . » | ! » ... . . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . ...... ... ...�.. �.. .. .. . I `-, wo-Way Stop Control`_.: Page 1 of 1 tel TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY GC CRT-CR28 1 /Co. . Ipate(Analysis Time Period Year &f015 25 TOT Waaiptlon i i acMeet Street: CR 28 . , : . i Street: CR 7 K� -on Orientation: th Period In . 0.25 E jar Street Harlhbound Southbound i. vernal 1 2 3 4 5 6 if. L T R L T R € plume 1 6 - 1 3 4 0 I k p-Hour Factor,PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 s (*Hourly Flow Rate,HFR 1 6 1 3 4 0 I k Heavy Vehicles 0 _ _ 0 Ian Type Undivided i Channelized 0 nes 0 1 0 0 1 0 (rion LTR LTR team Signal 0 0 inor Street Westbound Eastbound (Aovement 7 8 9 10 11 12 I L T R L T R i -1 plume 1 4 0 3 7 2 t k-Hour Factor,PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 i y Flaw Rate,HER 1 4 0 3 7 2 yercent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 \Dercent Grade(%) 0 f _,d N tiered Approach 0 �� N f 4torage 0 0 Channelized 0 t 0 1 0 0 1 0 ? . LTR LTR 1 >� NB SB Westbound Eastbound dto�� 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Cane Configuration LTR LTR LTR LTR }(`rplr) 1 3 5 12 (m)(vph) 1631 1627 897 934 I d5vic 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 %queue length 0.00 0.01 0.02 0.04 [ a,ntroi Delay 7.2 7.2 9.0 8.9 A A A A ( S — p proach Delay _ 9.0 l p —oach LOSA A A Reserved TM Copyright 0 200 Uoieeraly of Flxida,All Riper Reserved Vpyoo 4.I f Venice 4-rr to (_ (_% - I ' 'Two-Way Stop Control Page I of I 1, 7WO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY t. I ,Agenncy/Co. GC CR 7-CR 2e ; I r,Date Performed 8/23�06 I i, ,Analysis Time Period AM Year ®1015 25 TOT I i_Project Description v fEasUWeat Sleet: CR 28 ; Street CR 7 ('Intersection Orientation: North-South C .,.- N- '- Period S • 0.25 ! _ _ t-.Major r. Street Northbound Southbound E (Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 I volume L T R L T R 2 8 2 2 5 4 eak-Hour Factor,PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flow Rate,HFR. 2 ( 8 2 2 54 i (-Median Heavy Vehicles 0 — — 0 — — Type Undivided (S rm AT Chaelited 0 0 j t.1 lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 • LTR ., , ,m al 0 LTR 0 ) 1 rrwr Street WestboundWestboundEastbound . i t1/4 tMovement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R _Volume 0 6 1 4 4 0 -Hour Factor,PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 f Flow Rate,HFR 0 6 1 4 4 0 terceM Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade(%) 0 0 red Approach N f. (lineage0 O i )T Channei¢ed 0 0 k anes 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 LTR LTR t NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 . 9 10 11 12 (t lane Configuration LTR LTR LTR LTR ,}( ) 2 2 7 8 i tfC(m)(vph) 1624 1823 894 922 I iY/c 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 (fa%queue length 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.03 yonlol Delay 7.2 7.2 9.1 8.9 LDS A A A A f ipproach Delay — — 9.1 8.9 �iT oach LOS — — A A -ghts Reserved I wont Copyright �.Ir Copy 0 2003 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved Venice 4.11 (-i > ( _ i F i :- f Two-Way Stop Control Page I of 1 I TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY ._ i i • - GC Intersection 119-CR 5.5 1 . Jurisdiction I Date Performed .e a r Analysis Year 910 15 25 TOT I i Analysis Time Period ?Ty PM AP ! r Project Description I `.trEasUWest Street: 5N 119 • , . , Swat: CR 51/2 1 ( Intersection Orientation: East-N4at , Period025 I ( t ( .jor Street Eastbound Westbound ivement 1 2 3 4 5 - 6 ( L T R L T R ( Naume 0.11111 18 1119 0 0 1893 43 . peak-hour factor,PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 I "Hourly Flow Rate(veNh) 18 1119 0 0 1893 43 ( °portion d heavy i yehides,PNv 0 — — 0 — — (tjMedian type Two Way Left Trent Lane I rIRT Channelized7 0 c 0 s � 1 2 0 0 2 1 iguration L T o R . ` ( i Minor Street Northbound Southbound -- nt 7 8 9 10 11 12 F L T R L T R I ume(vehlh) 0 0 0 54 0 96 ?eeak-tour factor,PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 4,- fi'Flow Rate(veh/h) 0 0 0 54 0 96 c)roportion of heavy 0 0 0 0 0 0 i ()etudes, Pm/ E Clement grade(%) 0 0 I /'dared approach N N 1 ‘e Serge 0 0 `I f7T Channelized7 0 0 e enes 0 0 0 1 0 1 t onfiguraIkm L R roach FB WB Northbound Southbound II (Xement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 rne Configuration L 1. R )olume,v(vph) 18 54 96 I padty, cm(vph) 308 so 266 1 Jc ratio 0.06 0.63 0.36 eue length(95%) 0.19 2.92 1.58 ( `'.ontrol Delay(shreh) 17.4 100.4 26.0 eOS C F D €i lit=delay(slush) — 52.8 LOS —s — F TM �� Capy0rYt O 2001 Unliterary ofnai4,All Rib Reserved Vey 4.11 I ( : 4 i U: li ` 'wo-Way Stop Control Page i of I H is TW0.WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY t Y I GC Intersection 119-CR 5.5 A9ency1Co. Jurisdiction /Date for ". Analysis Yew 9015 25 TOT Y ; Analysis Time Period 111/// I (-aLrojed Desayrton kEastlwest street: SH 119 • I . • Street CR 51/2 ( intersection Orientation: st-bleat , Period(Ms': 0.25 l k•. ._ € ajor Street Eastbound _ Westbound t.rvement 1 2 3 4 5 6 I I f R L T R boiume(wehth) 95 4 1820 0 0 1367 138 &S-hour factor.PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 f hourly Row Rate(yeah) 95 1820 0 0 1367 138 of heavy 0 — — 0 — — I ((Median type Two Way Left Turn Lane Channelized? 0 0 nes 1 2 0 0 2 1 I 1bonfigu ration • L T T R . ( 1pstream Signal 0 0 ( ?Minor Street Northbound Southbound ement 7 8 9 10 11 12 I L T R L T R I olume(veh/h) 0 0 0 33 0 55 E 4eak-tour factor,PHF 1.00 - 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 cloudy, FlowRate( ) 0 0 0 33 0 55 krrroportion of heavy 1 -*hides, Ppm 0 0 0 0 0 0 c,tercent grade(%) 0 0 I ("pared approach N N I { Storage 0 0 I ifiT Channelized? 0 0 s Janes 0 0 0 1 0 1 / nfi uration L R t row EB W6 Northbound Southbound 1, r ovement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 _ a h.l ne Configuration L L R olume,v(vph) 95 33 55 i ($patty,c,(vph) 451 108 396 £ ratio 0.21 0.31 0.14 I ?ueue length(95%) 0.79 1.17 0.48 t^ trot Delay(s/veh) 15.1 € Yps(� C 5 F C 8 4 1 delay(s/veh) - - 29.4 D F C L LOS - - ,. (,:s2enr" Copyright O]eN UwvvWr of no"idy M Ride ReavtA VniialI.if O I (-I l �. ' Full Repot Page 1 of 3 FULL.REPORT GC intersection 66-7 It Agency or Co. Area Type Ad other erns s i Dale PerformedJurisdiction i -Time Per� Ailifr•r, Analysis Year 5401015 25 TOT i C. Grade= 0 0 1 0 t1 .I Y r I Oradea 0 for AaOr k.4 I j . 1 = T Et I ___,4 ° _ i`i R I1 ---.7"— �( ! � =L t ( ( ° 1 y r t (-f — r it = TR I ('l .v` y = LR 0 ' _ ° f = LTR ( EB WB NB SB 7' LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH R7 LT TH RT - (_Volume(veil" 152 606 5 2 711 13 0 7 2 7 9 66 • 1 f*Heavy veh 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 g(IF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.80 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 ated (P/A) PPPPPPPPPPPP I (,F tartup lost time 2.0 20 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Cpct eff.green 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 20 2.0 ,lAnlvaltype 3 3 3 3 3 3 _ I p lnit Extension . 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 I (ied/Bike/RTOR Volume 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 cjane Width 120 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 z ing(Y or N) N N N N N N N N r 1Y 0 0 0 0 0 0 ''trBd timing 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 [ y Penn WB Only EW Perm 03 04 NS Pe 06 07 08 (diming G= 20.0 G= 60.0 G= G= G= 30.0 G= G = G= ( Y= 0 Y= 5 Y= Y= Y= 5 Y= Y= Y= g `Y ration of Analysis(hrs)=0.25 Cycle Length C-= 120.0 tE e t J O t I () _) ' 'Fuli Report Page2of3 VOLUME ADJUSTMENT AND SATURATION FLOW RATE WORKSHEET 'f .Joel Description -... - i : 5 { i EB WB NB SS j LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT ` _IYoitme 152 606 5 2 711 13 0 7 2 7 9 66 iC I C THE 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 { ( rdj.Flow Rate 169 673 6 2 790 14 0 8 2 8 10 73 f (Lane. Group L TR L TR LTR LTR {:(Adj.flow rate 169 679 2 804 10 91 Iti ((Prop.LT or RT 0.000 — 0.009 0.000 — 0.017 0.000 — 0.200 0.088 — 0,802 ; - - satibw 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 I isuq��m•of lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 i,W 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.981 1.000 0.981 1.000 I 1.000 f (9 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 ti 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 ja 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 I i j t"i U 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 i ( -T 0.318 1.000 - 0 950 1.000 - 1.000 - 40.984 - 1 OecondaryfLT - 0.160 - - r12T I kt. - 0.999 - 0.997 0.973 — 0.892 Sb 1.000 1.000 — 1.000 1.000 — 1.000 — 1.000 — 13 1.000 — 1.000 1.000 — 1.000 E t tj• satftow 604 1861 1805 1859 1849 1687 Uc. adj.satfiow _ 305 _ VJ — — c i Ili €? E o 'Full Report Page 3 of 3 I I CAPACITY AND LOS WORKSHEET Proles Description It { • , e group L TR L 7R LTR LTR R (. i j.flow rate 169 878 2 804 10 91 (, + :Most rate 804 1861 1805 1859 1849 1667 (' .-t time 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 t r'een ratio 0.50 0.50 0.67 0.67 0.25 025 (-Ilene group cap• 302 931 454 1239 462 417 I /c ratio 0.56 0.73 0.00 0.65 0.02 0.22 low ratio 0.28 0.38 0.05 f 0.43 0.01 lit lane gip N N N Y N V I € um flow ratios 0.49 (Lost time/cycle 10.00 a ( ical',lc ratio 0.53 i � - NB SB : E > ES 1Lane group L TR L TR LTR LTR !Adj.flow rate 169 679 J 2 804 _ 10 91 ne group cap. 302 931 454 1239 482 417 I v/c ratio 0.56 0.73 0.00 0.65 0.02 0.22 E (tJn,,mien ratio 0.50 0.50 0.67 • 0.67 0.25 0.25 1 d_delay d1 20.8 23.6 12.2 11.7 33.9 357 I ay factor k 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 Itnt rem.delay d2 0.50 0.50 7.3 5.0 0.0 2.6 0.1 1.2 I _ factor 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 song delay 28.1 28.6 12.2 14.4 34.0 38.9 ane group LOS C C B B C I D I �.delay 28.5 14.4 34.0 36.9 (I approach LOS C B € C '��i��.t.,it'dt-ersec_delay 225 intersection LOS C $ f.dt 000 ' copyright 02000 University ofersion 4.11 Florida.nortds All Rights Reserved e4-' IC.F { . (i [[ 1 Ca 1 O I ` \`Full Report Page i of 3 is FULL REPORT t GC Intersection 66-7 lt iAgercY or Co. Area Type AM other was -11Date Performed •: krrisdiction � (Ti, me Period W • Analysis Year ®1015 25 TOT i E Graft 0 0 1 0 I ; 4' rf r ` )) I Jr Grades 0 Slims bs k. J 1 = T I• o I �lr a R ( ..�` ' fr ' _I = I_ F o ` I ;ri r tf- iTR i 'I r 1 t i G"°'` o 9LT ( , J y = L I f — Grade- 0 ger = LTR ( o 1 o • ( ? _ EB WB NB SB s LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT ;volume(vph) 39 559 0 5 636 10 3 6 6 12 6 137 Heavy veh 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 QHE 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 F aced /A) P P P P P P P P P P P P I tartup lost time 2.0 2.0 2.0 20 2.0 20 ('dcL •9 20 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 20 (r�� - 3 3 3 3 3 3 S IJnit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 l Ued&Biice/RTOR Volume 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 E `r to Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 _ 12.0 _ �9n'orN) N N N N N N N N ngfir ( r�stopsAr 0 0 0 0 0 0 f tig 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 i WB Only EW Perm 03 04 NS Perm 06 07 08 G= 20.0 G= 60.0 G = G= G= 30.0 G= G= G= Wining Y= 0 Y= 5 Y= Y= Y= 5 Y= Y= Y= tration of Analysis(hrs)=0.25 Cycle Length C= 120.0 II I Li (,1 ors v 'Full Report Page 2 of 3 l ,y VOLUME ADJUSTMENT AND SATURATION FLOW RATE WORKSHEET ('Project Description t� a - WS NB S8 {_1 LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT !Volume 39 559 0 5 636 10 3 6 6 12 6 137 t`PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 C ( Adj. Flow Rate 43 621 0 6 707 11 3 7 7 13 7 152 , .Lane Group L TR L TR LTR LTR 1Adj.flow rate 13 621 6 718 17 172 . LT or RT 0.000 - 0.000 0.000 - 0.015 0.176 - 0.412 0.076 0.884 i { - 1 :base satflow 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 C_ tum.of lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 ! 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 11Dk V 1.000 0.980 1.000 0.981 1.000 1.000 ( 19 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 it ell) 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 I ( `bb 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 I r 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 ?fir 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 I ( T 0.382 1.000 - 0.950 1.000 - 0.964 - 0.983 - secondary fLT - 0.203 - l - �S/RT - 1.000 - 0.998 - 0.944 - 0.881 I b 1.000 1.000 - 1.000 1.000 - 1.000 - 1.000 € xI — rrpb - 1.000 — 1.000 — 1.000 — 1.000 I 1•satflow 726 1863 1805 1859 1730 1646 1 .adj.satflow — 386 — — —gi I O iv t .S 4 t: ( IC-1 I • ;Full Report Page 3 of 3 ( , CAPACITY AND LOS WORKSHEET • I�, 1 ES WB NB SB ( 'Lane group L TR L TR LTR LTR ( t -Adj.lbw rate 43 821 6 718 17 172 I ( -Satflow rate € 726 1863 1805 1859 1730 1846 I eLost time 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 I (`Green ratio 0.50 0.50 0.67 0.67 0.25 0.25 1 ,-.Lane group cap. 363 932 494 1239 433 412 4. I C lv/c ratio 0.12 - 0.87 0.01 0.58 0.04 0.42 i {`Flow ratio 0.06 0.33 0.39 0.01 0.10 f _Crit lane group N N N Y N Y (.1Sum flow ratios 0.49 I (}'Lost time/cycle 1000 I ( ..cIv/c ratio 0.54 I_y Iok f EB WB NB SB J one group L TR L TR LTR LIR kdj•flow rate 43 621 6 718 17 172 no group caP-4,3 363 932 494 1239 433 412 fC ratio 0.12 0.87 0.01 0.58 0.04 0.42 ('Green ratio 0.50 0.50 0.67 0.67 40.25 0.25 I (1t/nit.delay dt 15.9 225 10.9 10.9 34.1 37.7 i `t lay factor k 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 I ncrem.delay d2 0.7 3.8 0.0 2.0 0.2 3.1 F factor 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 • i Ci trol delay 16.6 26.3 10.9 12.8 34.3 40.8 r. 22.anee�group LOS B C B B C D I Apprch.delay 25.6 128 34.3 40.8 1 '?Approach LOS C B C D I l 1.„atersec.delay 21.5 Intersection LOS C F ' noo Copy'igtl 0 2000 Uei a,iryof florid'.All Rids Reserved Vation 1.1( £[( v...F t- (-) € ( . 0 Iii E 0 CI I O Id I 11.10 4S } S | 2 APPENDIX C to S . ) ! / (, | d 1) i . ) c S Q (1 ! Q ) 6 S [ / : Q | U { | » | Q 2 O | 9 I ' 'Fu11 Report - Page 1 of 3 l FULL REPORT alyst GC Intersection 68.7 1 Date cy or C . r ,. Area Type Al other areas t f Jurisdiction ime Period f�PM Analysis Year EX015 251O 1 Grade= 0 1 ' ' ict [ 3 iii tiJ Grade= to € Slw Auer } f ' i i Fi, - -- 1 I Ir. = T r i_i! I f p lfl; - et i. ` R Ef:lI r —+ ..t.... : 1 �) L td � _ 1 l7; 1 ,> / r I e r = TR I �, (r' 7 Grade= 0 i ' + "4 = LT . 1.) r = LR i t, Gad" "-rt. = LTR r r r T EB SR WB NB C LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT t ume(vph) 45 615 70 160 700 10 195 55 325 15 35 140 i (11, Heavy 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 tI5HF 0.90 0.92 0.90 0.90 0.92 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 ctuated(P/A) P P P P P P P P P P P P ( )artup lost time 20 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 20 2.0 2.0 20 2.0 2.0 i txt eff.green 20 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 20 20 20 20 E ) vai type 4 4 3 3 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 }c} hit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 €*I/Bike/Ft:TOR Volume 0 0 , 15 0 0 0 0 80 0 Et Line Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 120 12.0 12.0 120 120 120 12.0 120 to in9(Y or N) N N N N N N N a (` arkh gthr N - I stops/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 _id timing 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 EB Only EW Perm WB ONy 04 NB Oniy NS Perm 08 = �G= 11.0 G 60.0 G= 8.0 G= rrfning ` G= 12.0 G= 14.0 Or G= Y= 0 Y= 0 Y= 5 Y= Y= ! (gation of Analysis(hrs)=0.25 5 Y= 5 Y= Y: r T Cycle Length C= 120.0 (3 i () 1 'Full Report Page 2 of 3 ) C VOLUME ADJUSTMENT AND SATURATION FLOW RATE WORKSHEET Project Description (li ES WB NB SD i t. LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT 1Volume 45 615 70 160 700 10 195 55 325 15 35 140 -- - IPHF 0.90 0.92 0.90 0.90 0.92 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 1 raj. Flow Rate 50 668 61 178 761 11 217 61 272 17 39 117 _1 ( ane Group L T R L TR L TRL T R 9Adj.flow rate 50 668 61 178 772 217 61 272 17 39 117 1 (Prop.LT or RT 0.000 — 0.000 0.000 — 0.014 0.000 — 0.000 0.000 — 0.000 b €78p ase salflow 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1 I ( Num.of lanes 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 (-;MI 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1 1.000 0.980 1.000 1.000 0.981 1.000'1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 I (ftyftg 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 s f ! (IP 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1Oth 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 l l 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1 MLU 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 i.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 e (IT 0.950 1.000 - 0.950 1.000 - 0.950 1.000 - 0.717 1.000 - Tiecondary tLT 0.190 - 0393 - 0.641 - - : r Wm- - 1.000 0.850 - 0.998 - 1.000 0.850 - 1.000 0.850 (II Pb 1.000 1.000 - 1.000 1.000 - 1.000 1.000 - 1.000 1.000 ( (, Pb - 1.000 1.000 - 1.000 - 1.000 1.000 - 1.000 1.000 I r" I ( adj. sallow 1805 1863 1615 1805 1859 1805 1900 1615 1363 1900 1615 °mac.adj.sallow 362 - 747 - 1218 - - (> 1 (j a I r,: € = 1 ` *WI Report Page 3 of 3 I " I i CAPACITY AND LOS WORKSHEET - I ` Project li} ` EB WB .. - NB SB .. I ( Mane group L TRL TR L T R L T R I C Adj.flow rate 50 668 61 178 772 217 61 272 17 39 117 I f'ISetflowrate 1805 1863 1615 1805 1859 1805 1900 1615 1363 1900 1615 t tkne 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 20 2.0 2.0 a.2.0 2.0 i [-Preen ratio 0.59 0.59 0.69 0.57 0.57 0.26 0.26 0.37 0.12 0.12 0.25 1 \.(Lane gip cap. 346 1102 1117 494 1053 374 491 592 159 222 404 t e-I k w/c ratio 0.14 0.61 0.05 0.36 0.73 0.58 0.12 0.46 0.11 0.18 0.29 i 1-, (-flow ratio 0.36 0.04 0.42 0.03 0.17 0.01 0.02 0.07 rat.lane group NNNN Y N N N N N Y f 1$um flow ratios 0.59 (3 ost time/cyde 10.00 I r lCriticat v/c ratio 0.64 i i i EB WB NB SB I pane group L T R L TR L T R L T R € sa , `OAdj.flow rate 50 668 61 178 772 217 61 272 17 39 117 I. O/ne WOW cap. 346 1102 1117 494 1053 374 491 592 159 222 404 "lcc ratio 0.14 0.61 0.05 0.36 0.73 0.58 0.12 0.46 0.11 0.18 0.29 Lii l^hvreen ratio 0.59 0.59 0.69 0.57 0.57 0.26 0.26 0.37 0.12 0.12 0.25 s "-risr i nd. delay dl 14.2 15.6 5.9 16.1 19.3 38.3 34.1 28.9 47.4 47.8 36.4 relay factor k 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 h hcrem_delay d2 0.9 25 0.1 20 4.5 6.4 0.5 2.6 1.4 1.7 1.8 I ()F factor 1.000 0.595 1.000 1.000 0.649 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 l L-control delay 15.0 11.8 6.0 18.1 17.0 44.8 34.6 31.5 48.8 495 38.2 cane group LOS BB A B BI D C C D D D i kApprch. delay • 11.5 17.2 37.1 41.8 F.pproach LOS B B D D >tersec•delay 21.6 Intersection LOS C [ 052000". Copy igk o 2000 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved Verami 4.11 f# O (} f; i x t( 1 1 ill () t l '-iPull Report Page 1 of 3 '� FULL REPORT yy GC Intersection 68-7 or Co. Area Type Al odor areas 1 . Date Performed .., won ( -Time Period Analysis Year ,W.5 25 TOT - rr r 1 Grade* 0 r -A, j 1 ( own= o �:l } ± trio= Ma. `..t . = T 5 . F r.t : I e ! -i.t ` R i 1 r -S. � r r li- = L iC I v . r r S . IL_ r . t = TR k 2 Grade r 0 I , .� I 1 ' 1 = LT t) � A* y ci = LR 1 1 = 0 ler = LTR 1 r r I- 5 EB WB NB SB. t �i LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT t (volume(vph) 170 670 200 270 985 15 230 75 365 10 110 70 %f' Heavy Men 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 'riHF 0.90 0.92 0.90 0.90 0.92 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 E (Actuated(WA) P P P P P P P P P P P P tartup lost time 2.0 20 20 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 eff.green 2.0 _2.0 2.0 20 2.0 2.0 20 2.0 2.0 2.0 20 1 ' stype 4 4 3 3 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 I, : Jnit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 10 3.0 10 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 1 oed/Bike&RTOR Volume 0 0 50 0 0 0 0 90 0 0 i (Fyne Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 120 120 12.0 12.0 12.0 120 120 I larking(Y or N) N N N N N N N N arkingThr lla cabs stopsnx 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ¢ t (.fed timing 3.2 3.2 3.2 12 I Ti EB Only EW Perm WB Only 04 ENS Only NS Perm 07 0a 1 { G= 11.0 G= 60.0 G= 8.0 G= G= 120 G= 14.0 G= G= 1 T'TM'_' Y= 0 Y= 0 Y= 5 Y= Y= 5 Y= 5 Y= Y= ion of Anaa rs =0.25 Cycle Length C= 120.0 6 R F t R (1 1 t Li f C}Full Report Page 2 of 3 ( i CI --1 VOLUME ADJUSTMENT AND SATURATION FLOW RATE WORKSHEET 1 .r I ``. EB WB NB se 1 ( LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT I it-/Volume 170 670 200 270 985 15 230 75 365 10 110 70 € { (PHF 0.90 0.92 0.90 0.90 0.92 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 I LA (-1Adj. Flow Rate 189 728 167 300 1071 17 256 83 306 11 122 78 1 (tans Croup L T R L TR L T R L T R (jkdj.flow rate 189 728 167 300 1088 256 83 306 11 122 78 E tirrop.LT or RT 0.000 - 0.000 0.000 - 0.016 0.000 - 0.000 0.000 - 0.000 c Base satflow 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 t')1um.of lanes 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 (w 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 ' 1.000 0.980 1.000 1.000 0.981 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 . ,Ifg 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 (;"2 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 ( b 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 /c/ e 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 l r tiLU 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 yT 0.950 L000 - 0.950 1.000 ' - 0.950 1.000 - 0.703 1.000 - st ndary1LT 0.067 - 0.348 - 0.403 - - 1 I . T - 1.000 0.850 - 0.998 - 1.000 0.850 - 1.000 0.850 [Ikb 1.000 1.000 - 1.000 1.000 - 1.000 1.000 - 1.000 1.000 - € tpb - 1.000 1.000 - 1.000 - 1.000 1.000 - 1.000 1.000 g t.4dj.satflow 1805 1863 1615 1805 1859 1805 1900 1615 1336 1900 1615 ciao.adj.satllow 127 — 662 — 766 — — IO ( II 1 O t0 i ` Full Report Page 3 of 3 :1 CAPACITY AND LOS WORKSHEET 1 :,..'Project Description $$ ES WB NB SB F t.Dane group L T R L TR L T R L T R I ( IAdj.flow rate 189 728 167 300 1088 256 83 306 11 122 78 ) i :8atflow rate 1805 1863 1615 1805 1859 1805 1900 1615 1336 1900 1615 1 0-ost tkne 2.0 2.0 2.0 ' 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 I E_green ratio 0.59 0.59 0.69 0.57 0.57 0.26 0.26 0.37 0.12 0.12 0.25 1 (lane group cap. 229 1102 1117 451 1053 302 491 592 156 i 222 404 's Iv/c ratio 0.83 0.66 0.15 0.67 1.03 0.85 0.17 0.52 0.07 0.55 0.19 ICI ratio 0.39 0.10 0.59 0.04 0.19 0.01 0.06 0.05 _ _ (.,hriit. lane group NNNN Y NNNNNN ii £i3um flow ratios 0.87 I £.lost time/cyde 10.00 (_critical v/c ratio 0.95 g (r EB WB NB SB rf regroup L T R L TR L _ T R L T R I .flow rate 189 728 167 300 1088 I 256 83 306 11 122 78 group cap. 229 1102 1117 451 1053 302 491 592 156 222 404 t tiapc ratio 0.8 0.3 0.66 0.15 0.67 1.03 0.85 17 0.52 0.07 0.55 0.19 i eon ratio 0.59 0.59 0.69 0.57 0.57 0.26 0.26 0.37 0.12 0.12 0.25 331}}h it delay dt 34.7 16.4 6.4 23.8 26.0 42.8 34.5 29.7 47.2 50.0 35.5 'Delay factor k 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 l ncrem.delay d2 27.5 3.1 0.3 7.6 36.6 24.4 0.7 3.2 0.9 9.5 1.1 F factor 1.000 0.595 1.000 1.000 0.649 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Sdontrol delay 62.2 12.9 6.6 31.3 53.5 67.2 35.3 32.9 48.1 59.5 36.5 1 'Mane group LOS E 8 A C D E 0 C D E D F } 9pprch.delay 20.5 48.7 46.8 50.4 k fir pproach LOS C D D D ;[ Uftersec.delay . 39.3 Intersection LOS D B 4W:t'SMOOTY Copyright O 2000 try of Florida,Al)Rights Rextvcd Versoa 4.If f r ,f Li C)Sf3 ({{// IJ l ) P `-'`(/_ $ I /Full Report Page I of 3 _ FU REPORT C. GC Intersection 119-51/2 ncy or Co. Area Type Al other areas i ,- Date Performed 8/22/)5 J iction #`N one Period ®PM Analysis Year EX e15 2 '�, - ,, I I Grads= 0 1 0 I ( E I l' -� Grade= 0 lit llwa I t `,:.t J ` 1 T (.( ' 1 j - 1 R f'f = e z _� M— - 2 r` 1 I tc ' 0 f,s �_ _ f 0 �' = TR i c. Grade 0 i 1 = LT I: ( I f I1 y = LR l H Gale• 'n = LIR $ ill 0 0 0 i :f= EB WB NB SB k (r LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TN RT LT TH RT e (Yolume(vph) 45 1320 2235 60 100 175 '% Heavy veh 2 3 3 2 2 2 i ;t1-IF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.90 0.90 0.95 4 cctuated(PIA) P P P P P P Iartup lost time 2.0 20 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 t .eft.green 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 20 2.0 al type 3 5 5 3 3 3 "r (bnit Extension 10 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 30 1 ( r°ed/BdcelRTOR Volume 0 0 0 0 0 75 I gene Width 12.0 12.0 • 12.0 12.0 12.0 120 • 1 1 arking(Y or N) N N N N N N N N 1 1lParidnglhr d tl3us stoperr 0 0 0 0 0 0 elied timing 3.2 3.2 12 ° EB Only EW Perm 03 04 SB Only 06 07 08 (( liming G= 8.0 G= 80.0 G= G= G= 220 G= G= G= { Y= 0 V= 5 Y= Y= Y= 5 Y= Y= Y= ciiuration of Analysis(Ms)=0.25 Cycle Length C= 120.0 I r fts - t . 1 E -_ ` dull Report Page 2 of 3 1 VOLUME ADJUSTMENT AND SATURATION FLOW RATE WORKSHEET F I `'Project DesaiptIon 1 ( 1 EB WB NB SB ` ` i ' J LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT I. i :'volume 45 1320 2235 60 100 175 I i F 3 � 1 { iPHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.90 0.90 0.95 I ( Adj. Flow Rate 47 1389 2353 67 111 105 tt f4. neap L T T I? L R l� { j•flow rate 47 1389 2353 67 111 105 I (j prop.LT or RT 0.000 - 0.000 0.000 - 0.000 - - I (Base satflow 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 { (Num.of lanes 1 2 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 I 1+W 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 E i 0.980 0.971 0.971 0.980 0.980 0.980 I (4ep 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 = r 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 I Sb 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 z fra 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1S itU 1.000 0.952 0.952 1.000 1.000 1.000 I (il_T 0.950 1.000 - 1.000 - - 0.950 - 1 cSecondaryfLT 0.050 - - - - (pRT 1.000 - 1.000 0.850 0.850 pb 1.000 1.000 - 1.000 - - 1.000 - `Rpb - 1.000 - 1.000 1.000 - - 1.000 ( r 'sdj.satflow 1770 3512 3512 1583 1770 1583 I c.adj.satfbw 93 - - I I I ` . I t o (- 4 l ' 'Full Report Page 3 of 3 i 1 CAPACITY AND LOS WORKSHEET L { Project Dercription 1 L ES WB NB SB I t. _ne group : L T T R ' L R 1 ( j.flow rate 47 1389 2353 67 111 105 I f Mow rate ^1770 3512 3512 1583 J 1770 1583 ost time 2.0 2.0 20 2.0 2.0 2.0 _ v n ratio 0.73 0.73 0.67 0.89 0.18 0.29 , ne gaup cap. 180 2575 2341 1412 325 462 I lc ratio 0.26 0.54 101 0.05 0.34 e ,0.23 f _ low ratio 0.40 0.67 0.04 0.06 0.07 I ii"rit. lane group N f N Y N N V N N E ( turn flow ratios 0.76 i ( ).ost time/cycle 15.00 i I- . >.ntical v/c ratio 0.87• _ I(.ane group L T T R L R . (Actj.flow rate 47 1389 2353 67 111 105 F. group cap. 180 2575 2341 1412 325 462 ' �,I i/c ratio 0.26 10.54 1.01 0.05 0.34 0.23 { ‘1vreen ratio 0.73 0.73 0.67 0.89 _ 0.18 0.29 _ E�nif.delay dl 29.1 7.1 20.0 0.7 42.7 32.2 delay factor k 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 1, I. crem. delay d2 15 0.8 19.8 0.1 28 1-1 1 (r'''IF factor 1.000 0.188 0.163 1.000 1.000 1.000 1 (j,2ontrol delay 32.6 2.1 23.1 0.8 45.5 33.4 ( ane group LOS C A C ` A D C I JY 3.1 22-5 39.6 I t_ipproach LOS A C D } t�Itersec.delay 16.6 Intersection LOS B s _ (jsz000TM Corryrigin O 2000 University of Roods,All Rights Reserved Version 4 If r[ ) 1 Ciiii O (._-_,,)x i � Full Report Page 1 of 3 r FULL REPORT liktGC Intersection 119-51/2 or Co. Area Type AN other areas I .,—,Date Pertained g�yg6 Jurisifiction t Time Period AM Analysis Year a CD 5 25 TOT ED t r , i )_...... 1 a T l ,_1 _ ,_ lef 1 1 . ,,,,, • L, . 1 r = L ,, (JF ° ° F i 1 = TR • l t-.r �� 1� 1y = LR ' °. . ' o ° o = LTR EB WB NB SB `f LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT (Volume(vph) 175 2150 1615 195 65 100 a%Heavy veh 2 3 3 2 2 2 �TOHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.90 0.90 0.95 l ` cdrated(P/A) P p P p P P •:- lost time 2.0 2.0 2.0 20 2.0 2.0 green 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 al type 3 5 5 3 3 3 i ()Jnit 6dension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 1 ( ded/Bike/RTOR Volume 0 0 0 0 0 0 e Width 120 12.0 12.0 12.0 120 120 t elf (Y or N) N N N N N N N N J 1 S:.arldngti r - I ` Yus stopslfv 0 0 0 0 0 0 I (, \ed timing 3.2 3.2 3.2 g. `SY 03 04 SB e � 6= 22.0 OM EVY66 G= G = G= 22.0 G=06 G=07 G=OB [ FEB= 0 Y= 5 Y= Y= Y= 5 Y= Y= Y= }e nation of Analysis(Ms)=0.25 Cyde Length C= 120.0 I t0 O . , ice; *ull Report Page 2of3 f I (- VOLUME ADJUSTMENT AND SATURATION FLOW RATE WORKSHEET r �p p F ,11 ! � •��gyp ss l LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT I ,-lkolume 175 2150 frt. a 1615 195 85 100 f (•ft-IF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.90 0.90 0.95 ('fj•Row Rate 184 2263 1700 217 72 105 IF` neap L T L R F� T R B 4., zz j.flow rate 184 2263 1700 217 72 105 1 -Prop.LT or RT 0.000 — 0.000 0.000 — 0.000 — F I �gase saNlow 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 d E glum.of lanes 1 2 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 E I, 1 0.980 0.971 0.971 0.980 0.980 0.980 F 1 9 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1 `9 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 . 1.000 t Sib 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 I ..d • 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 "2U 1.000 0.952 0.952 1.000 1.000 1.000 0 e tT 0.950 1.000 - 1.000 - - 0.950 - Pcon Lary ILT 0.080 - - - i - 11T - 1.000 - 1.000 0.850 - - 0.850 1)pb ' 1.000 1.000 - 1.000 - - 1.000 1 .1 1.000 - 1.000 1.000 - - 1.000 p1 sa8low 1770 3512 3512 1583 f r 1770 1583 *c.adj.satllow 150 - - () Ili 1O C F 1 t' I ' 'lull Report .- . Page 3 of 3 i l i j CAPACITY AND LOS WORKSHEET 1 Li( ES WB NB SB I group L T T R L R flew rate 184 1700 217 72 105 t, rate 1770 3512 3512 1583 1770 _ 1583 ( .ost time 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 20 2.0 Green ratio 0.73 0.73 0.55 0.77 0.18 0.41 Lane group cap. 408 5 1932 1227 325 646 - (v/c ratio .0.45 0.88 ,0.88 0.18 0.22 0.16 how ratio 0.64 0.48 0.14 0.04 0.07 (-1 rift.lane group N Y N N N Y N N `(1Sum flow ratios 0.69 ()ost time/cycle 10.00 i L' :I v/c ratio 0.75 ER WB _NB SB group(ILane L T T R L R .AiL-iAdj.flow rate 184 2263 1700 217 72 105 e group cap. 408 2575 1932 1227 325 646 v/c ratio 0.45 0.88 0.88 0.18 0.22 0-16 I( Teen ratio 0.73 0.73 0.55 0.77 0.18 0.41 (iOnif.delay dl 18.2 120 r 23.5 3.5 41.7 22.5 ¶i )eIayfactxk 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 `lrilcrem.delay d2 3.6 4.7 6.1 0.3 1.6 0.5 F factor 1.000 0.188 0.185 1.000 1.000 1.000 1,ontrol delay 21.8 6.9 10.5 3.8 43.3 23.0 (mane group LOS C A B A D C 1 1 l ypprch.delay 8.0 -9-7 31.3 (i. roach LOS A A C (. )►tersec.delay 9.7 Intersection LOS A t,2s-52000n4 CopyriRM 0 2000 Ueiversiry of Florida.All Rights Reserved Version d.1 f v O , Lr..� `- (21 f illi j Q t t - 1 1 two-Way Stop Control Page I of 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY t 111 GC Inter CR 28-D STREET „, _ 3 t Agency/Co. I (l Date Performed Analysis Year l0 525 TOT irAnalysis Time Period `,!. -_- Project Description t. ' : _, • t Street: CR 28 . , • , Street D STREET — ( •Memedion Orientation: East-Walt Period 0.25 � ( or Street Eastbound Westbound f `1 • ' ` ' 1 2 3 4 5 6 t - L T R : L T R - Volume(vehlh) 5 5 0 0 5 5 Peak-hour factor,PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ROW Rate(�) 5 5 0 0 5 5 ( not heavy ?vehicles, vehicles,PPIN0 — — 0 — — 1Medlen type Two Way Left Turn Lane L(a2T Channelized? 0 0 Z1la� 1 1 0 0 1 0 L T TR pstream Signal - 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound t jJ4ovement 7 8 9 10 11 12 - L T R L T R R ume(veNhl 0 0 0 5 0 10 Peak-lour factor,PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 , Hourly Flom Rate(veh/h) 0 0 0 5 0 10 F ( 3roportion of heavy 0 0 0 0 0 0 rl/lehides, PMv ?errant grade(%) 0 0 _ared approach N N 1 9 Storage 0 0 It. ciT Channeiized? 0 0 E (banes 0 0 0 0 0 0 I ". LR ) , , .roach EB WB Northbound Southbound � r ement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 Jane Configuration L LR c:plume,v(vph) 5 15 (w.) y cm(vph) 1823 1020 ( c ratio 0.00)(rue 0.01 e length(95%) 0.01 0.04 i I3,ontrol Delay(s/veh) 7.2 I s A 8.8 A I.=ifillaY(s/veh) — — 8.8 LOS — — A 5 Gismon4 Cop/MOM O 2003 Umwwry ofHort MI Men Rained Verson 4.I1 I ' two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 ( .1 t TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY 1 Analyst GC Intersection CR 28-D STREET t t �'/Co• Jurisdiction i (_j Date Performed r r. Analysis Year 0 15 25 TOT c !#Analysis Tine Period AAI 1 roject Description ( d n -rEast/Wost Street CR 28 street Co smen I (.'nten ection Orientation: 411-N6at �` Period : 0.25 k 1 ( llitajor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 II (1 L T R L T R (flume(vim) . 20 5 0 0 5 5 4,- eak-hour factor,PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ‘-- oury Flow Rate(vehlh) 20 5 0 .0 5 5 Proportion of heavy € (vehicles,PHV 0 — — 0 — — t Tian type Two Way Left Turn Lane i ( harxrei¢ed? 0 0 ' 11 nes 1 1 0 0 1 0 (-%onfiguration 1. T J I i •stream S'e 0 0 f�inor Street _ W Northbound Southbound i �j vo^� 7 8 9 10 11 12 fume(veh/h) r r r r i 9)1 _�Peak-hour factor,PHF r r 1.00 r r r r 1.00 1.00 Flow Rate wsh/h) r r r 5 r ° oportion of heavy Iehicles, PH,/ r r r r r r i ercent grade(%) r , I j ared approach £ Storage , r T Channelized? , r 1 ones 0 0 0 0 0 0 rgneation LR a i -- 1 1Approach ES WB Northbound - Southbound Se iovement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 clam ConfigurationL LR F plume,v(vph) 20 10 I f.)apadty,cm(vph) 1623 970 f ( >c ratio 0.01 0.01 1 ieue length(95%) 0.04 0.03 n ntrol Delay(s/veh) 7.2 8.7 CDS A A j delay(shish) — — 8.7 1proadi LOS — — A n000tu Copyright 03003 t misty of Florid*,AI Rights Rev S Vwoiom 4.11 I 1f. ^)Two=Way Stop Control Page I of 1 1/4 t TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY ! GC - . CR 7-8 STREET ncy/Co. (/Vale Performed 3,2006 •. Year 1 r 5256; • "Analysis Tine Period g PM 1 • • Description tNyest street: B STREET Street CR 7 . ntersedion Orientation: North-South . . Period Ws: 0.25 C a)or Street Northbound _ Southbound k ( ovement 1 2 3 4 5 6 € (-i L T R L T R € -II, ' II 0 90 5 15 50 0 (:Weak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 lt4ouriy Flow Rate,HFR 0 80 5 15 50 0 i Heavy Vehicles 0 — — 0 — • — (- edian Type Two Way Left Twn Lane (i}tT Channelized 0 0 ( ).anes 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 ?Configuration TR L T -4pstream S 0 0 I. (!Minor Street Westbound Eastbound ( 4oventent 7 8 9 10 11 12 tj t L T R L T R Volume 30 0 70 0 0 0 k-Hour Factor,PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 I riy Flan'Rate,HFR 30 0 70 0 0 0 . ercent Heavy Vehides 0 0 0 0 0 0 E €€A Grade(%) 0 0 i xlared Approach N N taage 0 0 )T Channetized 0 0 € E o guraton 0 0 0 0 0 0 LR ) NB SB Westbound Eastbound # 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 i ovemerrt i (jane Configuration L LR I i (Wh) 15 100 1 C(m)(vph) 1512 912 0.01 0.11 A-%Queue length 0.03 0.37 t Delay 7.4 9.4 1fypS A A - k („ Delay - - 9.4 I tl proach LOS - - A I bights Reserved Ii adnoTM Copyright 02003 UviwSry of Florida,M Rigs Round Varna Alf vision 4.mr I O • I € ( - v `• 'two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 ( TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY _ alyat GC CR 7-B STREET t • . :ncy/Co. `L nalysis Time Period l!V2iA �1`e. Year LJC(�15 •T 1i �ProjectDe n - t/West Street a s7REET' , , Street CR 7 .linteraection Orientation: North-South c- , • Period : 0.25 t 'Major Street Northbound -- Southbound r 4ovement 1 2 3 4 5 6 Fh L T R L T R 1 Lk/dame 0 85 30 80 55 0 I (_Peak-Hour Factor,PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 4 ( busy Flow Rate,HFR 0 85 30 80 55 0 1 ['percent Heavy Vehicles 0 — — 0 — — Median Type Two Way Lett Turn Lane t hT Channegzed 0 0 1 s iConf ration 0 1 0 rn 1 1 0 L T f (iOpstream Signal 0 0 il 1llinor Street Westbound Eastbound • f (:)slovement 7 8 9 10 11 12 [ ( 3 L T R L T R (Volume 20 0 40 0 0 0 k-Hour Factor,PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 S rl Flow Rate,HER F 20 0 40 0 0 0 ( n ercent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 E `1Percent Grade(X) 0 0 t cklared Approach N N t \storage - 0 0 (r,Y.T Channeled 0 0 nes 0 0 0 0 0 0 i .onfigurabon LR •: NB SB Westbound Eastbound I Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 ( t,one Configuration L LR i [ (trph) B0 60 C(m)(vph) 1487 859 lc 0.04 0.07 %queue length 0.13 0.22 ontrol Delay 7.5 9.5 i i S - A A . {1�Delay - 9.5 i /'pproadi LOS - - A ghts Reserved € dWTM Copyright 02003 University orFlorida,AU Rights Reserved i Venice...IfVersion t.l( it 1 g \✓ ( 1")fwo-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 i e .,--i TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY lyst GC Intersection CR 7-CR 28 Judy:fiction i , ate Performed � Analysis Year u T 5 2500 ' l k-Analysis Time Period g' r 1 Description ic st/West Street CR 28 • , • I Street CR 7 'Intersection Orientation: North-South . :,.L i'eriod Ws : 0.25 I ( \} � • Northbound Southbound k (Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 _ I ' L T R L T R £ 'iyolume 0 40 15 10 70 0 (Peak-Hour Factor,PNF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 (iciourly Flow Rate,HFR 0 40 15 10 70 0 € r. nt Heavy Vehicles 0 - - 0 — — edian Type Two Way Left Turn Lane ) (.12T Channelized 0 0 E Ganes 0 1 0 1 1 0 'Configuration LTR L TR I ‘1- stream • nal 0 0 1 (1 in81 or Street 1 Westbound Eastbound I ( Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 i. ) L T R L T R i Volume 40 5 50 5 5 5 Flour Factor,PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 y Flow Rate,HFR 40 5 50 5 5 5 _ (�Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 f ( Grade(%) 0 0 f lhaced Approach N N 0 . 0 k )T Channelized 0 0 9 -)ernes 1 I 0 0 1 0 nfguration L TR LT € R k ,pproach NB SS Westbound Eastbound lovement 1 4 7 4 8 9 10 11 12 : Qane Configuration LTR L L TR LTR {f e/ph) 0 10 40 55 15 t I (fn)(vph) 1544 1563 796 989 807 c 0.00 0.01 0.05 0.06 0.02 queue length 0.00 0.02 0.16 0.18 0.06 i S ntrol Delay . 7.3 7.3 9.8 8.9 9.5 pS A A A A A 'Pproach Delay - —• 9.2 9.5 I proad' LOS — A A gluts Reserved 000" Copyright 02003 Unives yof Florida,MI Rights Reserved Venice 4.11 Version 4.11 E 0e Ica E i I1 fiwo-Way Stop Control Page l of 1 1 : r { 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY ([ (" lyst GC CR 7-CR 28 I ('pate Perfumed fl 06 i Year EX�t5 25 OT ₹S C_`(Analysis Time Period AM/PII� t rojed Description v I ( gastANest Street CR 28 Street CR 7 nlersedion Orientation: Norer South Period in : 0. 5 I . or Street Northbound Southbound I ( )4ovement 1 2 3 4 5 6 ejl L t 4 R L T R I t IVolume 5 90 30 55 55 5 tc 'eak-Hour Factor,PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 i I Bounty Flow Rate,HFR 5 00 30 55 55 5 i ,iPercent Heavy Vehicles 0 — — 0 — — TtMedian Type Two Way Left Turn Lane I ti 2T Channelized 0 0 4• (des 0 1 0 1 1 0 (1^onfiguration LIR L TR - ([(! trearn S' 0 0 1. inor Street Westbound Eastbound • ( lovement 7 8 9 10 11 12 i0 L T R L T R Volume 25 5 25 0 5 0 k-Hour Factor,PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ur. rly Flow Rate,HFR 25 5 25 0 5 0 (3 ercent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 cent Grade(%) 0 0 f fared Approach N N i torage 0 0 s (AT Channelized 0 0 `)arses 1 1 0 0 1 0 ll figuration L TR LTR 1 tt preach NB S13Westbound Eastbound govement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 (Mane Configuration LTR L L TR LTR 1 ()(vph) 5 55 25 30 5 t ( ‘i(m)(vph) 1556 1480 674 876 605 it 0.00 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.01 _ c i35%queue length 0.01 0.12 0.12 0.11 0.02 1 control Delay 7.3 7.5 10.5 9.3 11.0 f1OS A A B A B ()AApproach Delay — 9.8 11.0 )pproach LOS A B 'ghts Reserved t poem Copyright O 2003 thiveniyofFlora All Rights Reined Venice 4.11 i Venial 4.11 i 0 i ( 1 ( (- ( / / | C) � | 1 ] / 55, / APPENDIX | S d Q 0 ( C I iG } C Q ! | 6 Q Q ( O 0 IJ ! O Q | S () ; r G : q |• ! Q J ' Pull Report Page 1 of 3 -I FULL REPORT GC intersection 86-7 i ( gency or Co. ;�, Area Type Al other areas „bate i (-lime Period i17 1 Analysis Year EX 10®ZS 'O�- tit -: .. - - - - '- • k i( Grade= 0 r 1 1 f') i lc [ 4 Grote. ° 9nr 1wer ( , 1 . t E ( -1 t ` } = T 1i ( ; a ° r R ,I H z 3 (I 111 2 is f .t �{ N 1 s ( r r aTR csae- u + ' I Nr1 `�yy . LT iI 1` , ` 7 a . LR 1 'i, l C 1 Grads= 0 = LTR i I r l t 4 ti. EB WB NB SB P () LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT E- 1 ( 'flume(vph) 50 760 125 185 855 15 306 110 290 20 155 150 t pypt Heavy veh 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 t. F 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 -wooded u (P/A) P P P P P P P P P P P P F (.. ..p lost time 2.0 2.0 20 2.0 20 20 2.0 20 2.0 20 20 rtd.eff.green 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 20 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 rnval type 3 4 3 3 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 s r ( t Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 10 j 4)3d/Bice/RTOR Volume 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 hne Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 _ 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 120 12.0 I 12.0 ng(Y or N) N N N N N N N N f rkerglhr I is stops/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 S ‘.ed timing 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 t 1 (, ) Excl.Left E1N Penn 03 04 NB Only NS Perm 07 08 I (Li G= 14.0 G= 50.0 G= G= G= 120 G= 26.0 G= G= r tt } Y= 3 Y= 5 Y= Y= Y= 5 Y= 5 Y= Y= 'duration of Analysis(his)=0.25 Clyde Length C= 120.0 I 2 (j 1 (> t (3 '-'FuI1 Report- Page 2 of 3 VOLUME ADJUSTMENT AND SATURATION FLOW RATE WORKSHEET ` C . _ i ES WB NB SS 1 ( ' LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT .t`}Volume 50 760 125 186 855 15 305 110 290 20 155 150 i IJPHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 I iAdj. Flow Rats 56 844 139 206 950 17 339 122 322 22 172 167 I (, Lane Group L T R L TR L T R L T R 1 C-"Adj.flow rate 56 844 139 206 967 339 122 322 22 172 167 1 CI I `(Prop.LT or RT 0.000 — 0.000 0.000 — 0.018 0.000 — 0.000 0.000 — 0.000 q ( e tee,_ 'ase satiow 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 `lJum.of lanes 1 2 1 1 2 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 (IMt 1.000 ..1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.980 1.000 1.000 O.981 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 ' 1.000 r eg 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 ti ? 1.000 1.000 1.000 1 A00 too() 1.000 1.000 1.000 1 A00 1.000 1.000 f t jbb 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 I '-IPa 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 l tdLU 1.000 0.952 1.000 1.000 0.952 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 / (} T 0.950 1.000 - 0.950 1.000 - 0.950 1.000 - 0.679 1.000 - I (rmecondary(LT 0.162 - 0.211 - 0.441 - _ - 1 �1 - €, kY� — 1.000 0.850 — 0.997 — 1.000 0.850 — 1.000 0.850 { `ice 1.000 1.000 — 1.000 1.000 — 1.000 1.000 — 1.000 1.000 ' Pb — 1.000 1.000 — 1.000 — 1.000 1.000 — 1.000 1.000 Ij'j4. satllbw 1805 .3547 1615 1805 3539 1805 1900 1615 1289 1900 1615 I '9 1. (free. mt. satflow 307 — 402 — 837 — — 6 . 1O i ‘,,) g I i 'Full Report Page 3 of 3 i l_ i 1 i CAPACITY AND LOS WORKSHEET Project Description c ES WB NB SB ( I sne group L T R L 1R L T R L T R '44dj.flow rate 56 844 139 206 967 339 122 322 22 172 167 i:-Satflow rate 1805 3547 1615 1805 3539 1805 1900 1615 1289 1900 1615 _ I "ppLost time 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 20 2.0 i r:Green ratio 0.56 0.42 i 0.56 0.56 0.42 0.36 0.36 0.52 0.22 0.22 0.38 1k jt.ane group cap. 347 1478 902 389 1475 307 681 834 279 412 606 I t. °/c ratio 0.16 0.57 0.15 0.53 0.66 0.85 0.18 0.39 0.08 0.42 0.28 ow ratio 0.24 0.09 0.27 0.06 0.20 0.02 0.09 0.10 a t.lane group NNNNY NNNNNN ( }Sum flow ratios 0.68 (�'ost time/cycle 15.00 F . rilical vie ratio 0.77 ,i EB WB NB SB t (Lane group L T R L TR L TRLT R (-AO.flow rate 56 844 139 206 967 339 122 322 22 172 167 Zane group cap. 347 1478 902 389 1475 397 681 834 279 412 606 /c ratio 0.16 0.57 0.15 0.53 0.66 0.85 0.18 0.39 0.08 0.42 0.28 t ()keen ratio 0.56 0.42 0.56 0.56 0.42 0.36 0.36 0.52 0.22 0.22 0.38 C/mt.delay dl 14.8 26.8 12.8 15.6 28.1 38.0 26.4 17.5 37.5 40.5 26.1 k (,belay factor k 0.50 0.50 0.50 O50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 x x,rem.delay d2 1.0 1.6 0.4 5.1 23 20.3 0.6 1.4 0.6 3.1 1.1 cF factor 1.000 0.876 1.000 1.000 0.876 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 c)'ontrol delay 158 25.1 13.2 20.7 26.9 58.2 27.0 18.9 38.0 43.6 27.3 f ' group LOS 8 C B C C E C B D D C delay 23.0 25.8 37.2 35.7 t I (?pproach LOS C C D D 1 ()tersec.delay 28.6 Intersection LOS C E umber" copyrighi 02000 Wiweiq offaida,All Rides Rcsaval Vernon 4.11 I0 0 p 1 0 [ 1 ' V.] I IIP Li 1 ( 1 'Full Report Page 1 of 3 f 'F_ FULL REPORT GC Intersection 66-7 �Agency Or CO-A Ar ea Type Al other areas _.. Date Performed r I. Ju isdN�bn ff= ....Date Period AM• Analysis Year IX 10025 lr- ( r r r Ri B ; Gala0 ir Aor Aiaa Ri a ' 1I — ifi ' i € f_I 2 -l+ I 244) I t_, 1 = L ICI ' it ' ' I C ` aTR I C.r Grade= 0 1 = LT I {-� I 14) 1 y = LR Grade• d Y ' = LIR I I I r ES WB NB SB i LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT € rit/H veh 180 805 170 310 1415 305 100 180 135 80 s (PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.95 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 t (-Actuated-,Actuated(PIA) P P P P P P P P P P P P C ltartup lost time 2.0 20 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 20 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 ) erxt.eff.green 20 2.0 2.0 20 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 20 20 2.0 Syal lY9e 3 4 3 3 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 nit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 10 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 led/Bace/RTOR Volume 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 's,ane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 120 12.0 120 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 t PPa rki g((Y or N) N N N N N N N N I CiFiarkin r 4 (ilius stops/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 )ed timing 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 plc; Exd.Left EW Penn 03 04 NB Only NS Perm 07 08 maiming G= 15.0 G= 51.0 G= G= G = 17.0 G= 19.0 G= G= Y= 3 Y= 5 Y= Y= Y= 5 Y= 5 Y= Y= `s luration of Analysis(trs)=0.25 Cycle Length C= 120.0 ii I (- z �` : v t [ i Iull Report _ Page 2 of 3 C VOLUME ADJUSTMENT AND SATURATION FLOW RATE WORKSHEET C Project Dsi ipdan e \ 1 EO VVB NB SB I( ( ) IT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT 1t �durne 180 805 170 310 1415 20 305 100 180 15 135 80 i -14IF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.95 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 [ ijut. Flow Rate 200 894 189 344 1489 22 339 111 200 17 150 89 } ciane Group L T R L TR L T R L T R I ({ 1.flow 200 894 189 344 1511 339 111 200 17 150 89 { ? 4 p.LT a RT 0.000 — 0.000 0.000 - 0.015 0.000 — 0.000 0.000 — 0.000 j £lase maw 1900 1900 1800 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 l)um.of lanes 1 2 1 1 2 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 `- (,' t 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 I1.000 0.980 1.000 1.000 0.981 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 0 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Ijab 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 ¢I `�,a} 1.000 1.000 1.000 1000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 • 4 U 1.000 0.952 1.000 1.000'0.952 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 I OT0.950 1.000 - 0.950 1.000 - 0.950 1.000 - 0.685 1.000 OT Liacondary ILT 0.074 - 0.196 - 0.408 I # - IT - 1.000 0.850 - 0.998 - 1.000 0.850 - 1.000 0.850 pb 1.000 1.000 - 1.000 ' 1.000 - 1.000 1.000 - 1.000 1.000 - 1 npb - 1.000 1.000 - 1.000 - 1.000 1.000 - 1.000 1.000 I U1.satfow 1805 3547 1615 1805 3540 1805 1900 1615 1302 1900 1615 It„ac.adj.satlo w 141 - 373 - 776 - - It 4 (.3 lc) 4 f 'Full Report Page 3 of 3 1 l 7 CAPACITY AND LOS WORKSHEET � € t E8 VVB NB S8 (- Lane group L TRL TR L T R 1 T R I ( i.flow rate 200 894 189 344 1511 339 111 200 17 150 89 i tflow rate 1805 3547 1615 1805 3540 1805 1900 1615 1302 1900 1615 t Lost time 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 20 2.0 2.0 20 Green ratio 0.57 0.43 0.61 0.57 0.43 0.34 0.34 0.51 0.16 0.16 0.32 _ Lane group cap. 289 1507 .. 982 394 1505 411 649 821 206 301 525 �¶`(v/,c ratio 0.89 0.59 0.19 0.87 1.00 0.82 0.17 0.24 0.08 0.50 0.17 (-Gr OW ratio 0.25 0.12 0.43 0.06 0.12 0.01 0.08 0.06 rit.lane group NNNN Y NNNNNN f..pum flow ratios 0.80rr, l y ost lima/Cycle . 15.00 t 7ritical v/c ratio 0.92 f.t (ill ane group L T R L TR L T R L T R f 7ndt-flow rate 200 894 189 344 1511 339 111 200 17 150 89 One group cup• 289 1507 982 394 1505 411 649 821 206 301 525 iv/c ratio 0.69 0.59 0.19 0.87 1.00 0.82 0.17 0.24 0.08 0.50 0.17 tt reen ratio 0.57 0.43 0.61 0.57 0.43 0.34 0.34 0.51 0.16 (116 0.32 - r nit,delay dl 31.4 26.5 10.4 17.6 34.5 36.5 27.6 16.6 411 46.1 28.9 s ?elay tabor k 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 r ( rfuaem.delay d2 12.8 1.7 0.4 22.5 24.2 17.0 0.6 0.7 0.8 5.8 0.7 is factor 1.000 0.867 1.000 1.000 0.867 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 (Aontrol delay 44.3 24.7 10.9 40.1 54.1 53.5 28.2 17.3 43.9 51.9 29.6 F0.0ane group LOS DC BD D D C a D D C f 'OPprch•delay 25.7 51.5 38.0 43.6 I �approach LOS C D D D It /Otersec.delay 40.6 Intersection LOS D p t 'u ^' copyight O2000 USwt yofnond..MI Riau Relented Version a.If i F f at i Li E U •e Jo Jo € ( . ' ' FuII Report Page I of 3 FULL REPORT GC Intersection 11951/2 , - or Co. Area Type AN other areas 6 i a,to Performed � r.�4e i. Jurisdiction - me Period 1PM Analysis Year IX 10©2 `l l ( I Grade= 0 1 0 1 I l 01 P �I. 1 - Goa.- 0 se. ileac 1 I I (,) I` , 1 = T ( c\ 1 _ !� . . 1 R € 1 _ I ,, i 1.., 2 (I} 0 0 }T� f = TR rri $ Lt) Grade= 0 I I }- I = LT i i I. Grade 0 o a = LiR t EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT E Volume(vph) 235 1610 2725 55 150 310 Eif'@o ivy veh 2 3 3 2 2 2 I �HF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.90 0.90 0.95 (PwA) P P P P P P I _)tertup lost time 2.0 20 2.0 2.0 , 2.0 20 F xL i 22 eft green 20 20 0 2.0 2.0 20 • ____tve 3 5 5 3 3 3 I nit Extension 30 30 10 3,0 3.0 3.0 )ed/BRut/RTOR Volume 0 0 0 0 0 75 Qane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 120 12.0 12.0 orN) N N N N N N N N Ibrif a/fr 0 0 0 0 0 0 E tiring 3.2 3.2 3.2 I c%,s EB Only EW Perm 03 04 SB Only 06 07 08 Miming G = 8.0 G= 90.0 G= G= G= 12.0 G= G= G= Y= 0 Y= 5 Y= Y= Y= 5 Y= Y= liuration of Analysis(hrs)=0.25 Y Cycle Length C= 120.0 iiikk II 1O O 1 c )Full Report Page 2 of 3 1 { VOLUME ADJUSTMENT AND SATURATION FLOW RATE WORKSHEET fit, - .� ( Project Deadpan_ Dedpan ® WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT i( /plume 235 1610 2725 ' 55 150 310 (PHF 0.95 0.95 0.05 0.90 0.90 0.95 *`_ 1 , 1 . i ( Adj.Flow Rate 247 1605 2868 61 167 247 �. ►�e Group L T T R L R {_(Adj.flow rate 247 1695 2868 61 167 247 Ifrop.LT or RT 0.000 - 0.000 0.000 - 0.000 - - tij 1t ` - f I-u fse sat ow 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 ti F � y�lum.of lanes 1 2 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 f (i�w 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 !Iiiir 0.980 0.971 0.971 0.980 0.980 0.980 cg 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 (-p ,1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 (1 b 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 I. (�,a 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 )11!! -U 1.000 0.952 0.952 1.000 1.000 1.000 E S ,..T 0.950 1.000 — 1.000 — -- 0.950 — . secondary fLT 0.044 #. I (1-kT — 1.000 — 1.000 0.850 — — 0.850 i 1.pb 1.000 1.000 -- 1.000 — 1.000 _ j IT° — 1.000 — 1.000 1.000 -- — 1.000 �dj satflow 1770 3512 3512 1583 1770 1583 I 1„1ec.adj. satflow 83 — _. _ — C- LF E f O IPull Report Page 3 of 3 k ‘i CAPACITY AND LOS WORKSHEET ' .Project Daaipfion EB WB NB SB i JLaneç,roup L T T R L _ R I ( ,Vadj.flow rate 247 1695 2868 61 167 247 I (_tatflow rate 1770 3512 ,3512 1583 1770 1583 i ,Lost time 2.0 2.0 12.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1Green ratio 0.82 0.82 0.75 0.89 10.10 0.21 f t _- Lane group cap. 180 2868 2634 1412 177 330 my/c ratio 1.37 0.50 1.09 0.04 0.94 0.75 ratio 0.48 0.82 0.04 0.09 0.16 1 y (_.r.rit- lane group N N N N N Y N N - s m flow ratios 1.72 i. C ost time/cycle 10.00 .i•:. v/c ratio 1.87 Eli Wg NB SB i . Lane group L T 7 R L R \-(Adj.flow rate 247 1695 2868 61 167 247 (pane group cap. 180 2868 2634 1412 177 330 Ivic ratio 1.37 0.59 1.09 0.04 0.94 0.75 t (-)Green ratio 0.82 0.82 0.75 0.89 0.10 0.21 1 f�.delay dl 46.3 3.9 15.0 0.7 53.7 44.6 i y factor k 0.50 0.50 O.5O 0.50 0.50 0.50 ncrem delay d2 198.6 0.9 47.1 0.1 54.2 14.4 (E- air 1.000 0.273 0.510 1.000 1.000 1.000 �EC.ontrol delay 244.9 , 2.0 54.7 0.8 107.9 59.0 i (lane group LOS F A D A F \ E (.t ch.delay 32.9 - 53.6 78.7 i Approach LOS C O E 1 f� r��tersec. delay 48.0 Intersection LOS D Copyright O 2006 University of Florida,AU Rights Reserved Yusioat 4.!f 1 (") 1 (r I FU 3Eli 14 i i i I (-) I `Tull Report Page 1 of 3 I - , FULL REPORT t GC Intersection 11941/2 I ( or Co. Am Type AN other areas Performed Jurisdiction I ( imBe Period Analysis Year IX10®2• •j3 I .. Grades 0 1 0 1 (..1' Gerdes 0 El)M.e [ ( I ( K 1 = T ( f _ R { 1 2 —.es . tie-- • 2 r ', I = L (13 o I o f (') =TR (.1 Grades 0 I I j 1 = LT (A y = LR Tir t Gad*- Y�` LIR a � 0 O 0 y EB WI NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT volume( ) 315 2625 1970 170 95 230 I ?HeavyV 2 3 3 2 2 2 ° F 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.90 - 0.90 0.95 led(PIA) P P P P P P j ups time 2.0 2.0 20 2.0 2.0 2.0 3 ef•green 2.0 20 20 2.0 2.0 2.0 _ EvaltYPe 3 5 5 3 3 3 f�dansion 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 10 3.0 ti.RTOR Volume 0 0 0 0 0 60 th 12.0 12.0 12.0 120 12.0 12.0 YorN) N N N N N N N N us sfopsllr 0 0 0 0 ` 0 0 ) s. 3.2 3.2 3.2 fij EB Only EW Perm 03 04 SB Only 06 07 os G= 22.0 G= 66.0 6= G= G= 22.0 G= G= G= { } Y= 0 Y= 5 Y= Y= Y= 5 Y= Y= Y= 'placation of Analysis(hrs)=0.25 Cycle Length C= 120.0 s 1 (J 1 4 6 `' I () I : Full Report Page 2 of 3 VOLUME ADJUSTMENT AND SATURATION FLOW RATE WORKSHEET I ( • . Description ( Ii EB VVB NB SB I ( '' IT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH i RT I f't aurae d • r 315 2625 1970 170 95 230 (a HF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.90 0.90 0.95 E (' 4d1. Flow Rate- 3 332 2763 2074 189 106 179 t iiti. ne Group L T T R L R 332 2763 106 179 id.flow rate 2074 189 1 'Prop LT or RT 0.000 — 0.000 0.000 — 0.000 — — a I (pose satflow 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 F ' alum.of lanes 1 2 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 P C 1.000 t000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 c V 0.980 0.971 0.971 0.980 0.980 0.980 (9 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 tio 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 c is 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 I AU 1.000 0.952 0.952 1.000 1.000 1.000 e 'T 0.950 1.000 - 1.000 - - 0.950 f - tL6econdary 1LT 0.061 - - - - I4 .1T - 1.000 - 1.000 0.850 - - 0.850 1.000 1.000 - 1.000 - - 1.000 - c1ipb 1.000 - 1.000 1.000 - - 1.000 ldj. satflow 1770 3512 3512 1583 1770 1583 yI Jet.adj.satflow 113 — — — — ! O P ii • 4J J 'Full Report Page 3 of 3 t E • t CAPACITY AND LOS WORKSHEET JProject Description • EB WB NB SB ` rare group L T T R L R ( � j.flow rate 332 2763 2074 , 189 106 179 tflow rate 1770 3512 3512 .1583 V 1770 1583 ( ? ost time 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 _ ( reen ratio 0.73 0.73 0.55 0.77 0.18 0.41 1 Lane group c• 387 2575 1932 1227 325 646 l.Ivlc ratio 0.86 1.07 1.07 0.15 0.33 0.28 (how ratio 0.79 0.59 0.12 0.06 0.11 e (tom.lane group N Y N N N Y N N �lSum flow ratios 0.85 U ost time/cycle 10.00 i Vritical vk ratio 0.92 ( i_. -_- :-.::-...,:-......„.!;•-..;,:.. .-,:::)::-...,..-.5,_ ,.:_.t,- (--; E8 WB NB SB lLane group L T T R L R _Adj.flow rate 332 2763 2074 189 106 179 tine grog call- 387 2575 1932 1227 _ 325 646 rvlc ratio 0.86 1.07 1.07 0.15 0.33 0.28 if reen ratio 0.73 0.73 0.55 0.77 0.18 0.41 WM. delay dl 39.1 16.0 27.0 3.4 42.6 23.7 1 (-1Oelay factor k 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 y 0.50 0.50 J�ncrem. delay d2 21.1 41.1 43.4 0.3 2.7 1.1 VF factor 1.000 0.430 0.256 1.000 1.000 1.000 t1. delay 60.2 48.0 50.4 3.7 45.2 24.7 clone group LOS E D D A D C (APprch•delay 49.3 46.5 32.4 S kpproach LOS 0 0 C ciltersec.delay 47.3 Intersection LOS D ( 1u ., szoao copyn�fic 02000 University anomie.MI Rights Rescr+bA Version 4.11" J r ) O J 0 p1 • } O (_) I `' two-Way Stop Control Page t of t If t TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY GC • CR7-CR28 I t Co. j 'mate Performed &O3�TD06 Yew B)C 100 .k Irats Time Period AillpA(1 ct Desorption 'v`1 Vest Street CR 28 Street CR 7 i f nteraection Orientation: North-Sotrlh Period : 0.25 1 r Street Northbound Southbound I 9Aovement 1 2 3 4 1 5 8 ) ( L T R L T R Volume 15 175 80 85 275 5 1 ()eak-Hour Factor,PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 i "'lowly Flow Rate,HFR 15 175 80 65 275 5 6 ,3?ercent Heavy Vehicles 0 — • — 0 — — i m7Aedian Type Two Way Left Turn Lane (.)tT ChannaUzed 0 0 fOarses 0 1 0 1 1 0 LTR L TR i pstream Sgnal 0 e0 [! inor Street Wes Eastbound f ( vement 7 8 9 10 11 12 ` 0 L T R L T R I tVolume 190 5 220 5 5 40 E k-Hour Factor,PH.F 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 rly Flow Rate,HFR 190 5 220 5 5 40 ) " Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 ercent Grade(%) p 0 flared Approach N N �pmg 0 0 1 T Channeruzed 0 0 Ibanes 1 1 0 0 1 0 tion L TR LTR SB Westbound Eastbound ement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 One Configuration LTR L 1 TR LTR t 1vph) 15 65 190 225 50 i L(m)(Wh) 1294 1322 425 814 628 E c 0.01 0.05 0.45 0.28 0.08 €i %queue 0.04 0.15 2.25 1.13 0.26 rrtml Delay 7.8 7.9 20.1 11.1 11.2 i SLbS A A C B B L.)Proach Delay — — 15.2 11.2 1 Icisproach LOS - - C B Reserved Coma 02003 Uoiwwry of(9wMh,All Riau BdaxA Version 4.11 I Vella l.lf 1 [() L_.) e ( . E c two-Way Stop Control Page l of 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY GC .eertiuf CR7-CR28 l •:. - /Co. ...r. i (,Date Performed 8/2 r r: Year IX 1 o023 CO I Analysis Time Period AM 1i er • .led Description lc , Street CR28 • Street OR 7 Intersection it • Nort)-South b . , Period In • 0.25 . — l:I Street MoAlrbound Southbound I C 1 2 3 4 5 6 I -% L T R L T R I `(Volume 15 175 240 185 140 10 (.peak-Hour Factor,PHF 1.00 i 1.00 • 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 t Toady Flow Rate,HER 15 _ 175 240 185 140 10 irlPeroent Heavy Vehlc es 0 _ — — 0 — gType Two Way Left Turn Lane ?ST Channeiized 0 0 ( Janes 0 1 0 1 1 0 I € onfigur+don LW L TR `-lUpstreerrm Signal 0 0 u F (- nor Street Westbound _ Eastbound I Ctiovement 7 8 9 10 11 12 I 0 L T R L T R (Valuate 210 5 150 5 5 5 k- low Factor,PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 t rly Flow Rate,HER 210 5 150 5 5 5 st 4ercent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 F ercent Grade(%) 0 0 TPjr`lared Approach N N ( t. 0 0 torahe _ ,�tT Ctmanrmelized 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 Lion L 7R LTR t . I NB SB Westbound Eastbound a '.„movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 f Sane Configuration LTR L L 7R LTR s .,- h) 15 185 210 155 15 I t ,(m)(vph) 1444 1155 343 721 344 ?ic 0.01 0.16 0.61 0.21 0.04 115%queue length 0.03 0.57 3.85 0.81 0.14 i Zentrol Delay 7.5 8.7 30.7 11.4 15.9 A A D 8 C 1 wproach Delay — — 22.5 15.9 € proad%LOS — — C C nights Reserved i wen Copyright 02003 University ofFlorida,All Rights Reserved Vasim Lrf l Vanton4.rf . 0_ U p 3 € ( Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 ! ti Ii TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY i GC Intersection CR 7-8 STREET ! l Agency/Co. ...! #-' Time Date PeA PSgfr Year EX 1Q�5'23`� J I ` Project Description F •East/West Street 8 STREET i - . Street CRY i Intersection Orientation: North-Souui call.,:,,, Period its : 0.25 s` ( — — IC Maio,Street Northbound SouttlbotaW `-4Movement — 1 2 3 4 5 6 i rn L T a L T R '-'Volume 0 395 5 15 315 0 • ( Weak-Hour Factor,PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 i Cr: �ly Flow Rate,HFR 0 395 5 15 315 0 - Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 — — 0 — — _,`' (- tan Type Two Way Left Turn Lane Crhanneted 0 0 t C)..anes 0 1 0 1 1 0 -1onfiguration TR L T `''Upstream Signal 0 0 t tnor Street Westbound Eastbound - It (gr#�ovement 7 8 9 10 11 12 f i L T R L T R !Volume 30 0 70 0 0 0 € k-How Factor,PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 I Flow Rate,HFR 30 0 70 0 0 0 (1 ercent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 I ]Percent Grade(%) 0 0 .-=lared Approach N N }t btorage '0 0 q )2T Channdized 0 0 g , Manes 0 0 0 0 0 0 ( - LR tNB SB Westbound Eastbound rctovement. 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 { )ane Configuration L LR _ 1 (1(vPh) 15 100 5r(m)6911) 1170 596 We 0.01 0.17 i -.115%queue length 0.04 0.60 151.Ionkpl Delay 8.1 12.3 (SOS A 8 1pproach Delay — — 123 ( LOS — - B *gilts Reserved net Copyright 02003 University of Flerids,,w Right.Reserved Version 4.11 I Version CH U 0 , • f , # ti t Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of I It . r TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY it . 1 i 9enrt GC CR7-B STREET E f-Date Performed Year EX 1• at e i ,. Time Period AM& 4 _ , o1erA Description lJ i r t/West Street 8 STREET • i . t Street: CR 7 l Intersection Orientation: NatlrSouth Period In : 0. 5 Itt 1 ( .rS*ne Southbowid t (' . ement 1 2 3 4 5 6 t ; L T R L T R 1 (Volume 0 300 30 80 305 0 - (_peak-Horr Factor,PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 I-lowly Flow Rate,HFR 0 300 30 60 305 0 (,;Percent Heavy vehicles 0 — — 0 — — fkiedian Type Two Way Left rum Lane (iT Channelized 0 0 • 'Ganes 0 1 0 1 1 0 t ( 9 TR L T pstream Signal 0 0 i (1 Uinta Street Westbound Eastbound • t. 7 Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 I L T R L T R i 'Volume 20 0 40 0 0 0 k-Hour Factor,PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 y Flow Rate,HFR 20 0 40 0 0 0 E erc:ent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 percent Grade(%) 0 0 €$ .ha red Approach N N torage 0 0 1 ( ?TChannelized 0 0 if ' nes 0 0 0 0 0 0 f • :lion LR 1 " f r 'proach NB SB Westbound Eastbound f c iovemenl 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 x ()ane Configuration L LR a Y�(vPh) 60 60 (".(m)(vPh) 1241 620 l &ic 0.05 _, 0.10 s 5%queue length 0.15 0.32 € ; :day 8.0 11.4 ) J0S A B , Delay — 11.4 proach LOS — — B ghts Reserved earTM Cow 02103 University of Fled(:,AR Rights Raaved version 4.ir Venison s.1 r ) O I6 )Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of I I k TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY ICb Analyst GC Intersection CR 28-D STREET I Agency/Co. Jurisdiction Date Performed_ Analysis 5 Year 10 5 TOT Analysis Timer Project Description PAI 1 U. `East/West Street: CR 28 . i . F Sheet: D STREET € t ,Intersection Orientation: East-West Period 0.25 1 r Major Street Eastbound Westbound € ‘. ement I :Volume(vehlh) t 5 5 I Peak-hour factor,PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.'> C. ( . dy Flow Rate(vehm) 15 1CND r ,. { C 'i•roportan of heavy I )vehicles,PM, r f, E. dian type Two Wa Left Tum Lane I Me Channelized? c r I. C C . nes 1 1 r , _ :;.n Upstream Signal 0 ' 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R tome(r�eWh) 0 0 0 5 0 110 eak-hour factor,PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 (-proportion y (veh/h) 0 0 0 5 0 110 p roportion of heavy I clyehides Pow0 0 0 0 0 0 (eerc ent grade(%) 0 0 ! J fared approach N 1) Storage 0 0 ( 2T Channelized? 0 0 ( anes0 0 0 0 0 0 infiguration LR • . . EB Will Northbound Southbound .11 vemeni 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Sane Configuration L LR (Volume, v(vph) 15 115 Et 3aPadtY. Cm(vPh) 1283 750 I +ic ratio 0.01 0.15 _ uueue length(95%) 0.04 • 0.54 Cyontrol Delay(s/veh) 7.8 10.7 OS A B 1 ,t,iir delay( h) - - 10.7 LOS - - B IC/WWKind Copyright 0]903 u.iNnay silica ,Aft RKhn Roevci Vayioe 4.11 i 1O . 1Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst GC Intersection CR 28-O STREET r Agency/Co Jurisdiction Ii ( Date Performed 6?3f1006 Analysis Year 106®25 TOT . Analysis Time Period ,ti:2 J 1 (- Project Description [ C. East/West Street tit 28 • , • , Street: D STRaT C Intersection Orientadort --West -- •,1 Period 4,1 ): 0.25 y Major Street Westbound i L Movement 1 Eastbound3 4 5 6 L' L T A R L T R i c Volume(veh/h) 75 240 0 0 265 20 (. Peak-hour factor,PhIF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flow Rate(veh/h) 75 240 0 0 265 20 I ( on of heavy t i1vehides,P� 10 — — 0 — — f-tMedian type Two Way Left Turn Lane ( /RI Charnelized? 0 0 ! clans 1 1 0 0 1 0 3 (Configuration L T 7R. r ,l)pstream Signal 0 0 Inor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 _ L T R L T R €itlume(veh/h) 0 0 0 5 0 80 �e_a-�kJ-�h�our factor,REF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 i1orriy Flow Rate(veti/h) 0 0 0 • 5 0 80 ( I .$roportionofheavy tyehides• Priv 0 0 0 0 0 0 I ( .ercent grade(%) 0 0 /fared approach N N i Storage 0 0 € T Channelized? 0 0 p lc_ nes 0 0 0 0 0 0 I iguration LR I EB WB Northbound Southbound Siktovement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 Sane Configuration L LR Volume,v(vph) 75 85 ;rapacity,cm(vph) 1289 746 Q/c ratio 0.06 0.11 9ueue length(95%) 0.19 0.38 YControl Delay(s/ueh) 8.0 10.4 OS A B delay(s/veh) 10.4 LOS — — B OvocTM Ceps*02001 UdwriyofFlorida,MI Rights Resr.ed Val : 4.t( O Li l { 'Two-Way Stop Control Page I of I E ( TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY i Analyst GC Intersection CR 28-F STREET i Agenq/Co Jurisdiction r t.) Date Performed 3/22/006 Analysis Year O25,4• (, Analysis Time Period g PM r`Project Description k East/West Street: CR 28 it . i Street: F STRaT IQ.inersection Orientation: East-Nest Period 0 f l'Major Street Eastbound Westbound 1 r Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 ti- L I R L T R (,Volume(veh/h) 10 35 25 5 110 5 i r Peak-hour factor,PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ‘ Hourly Flow Rate(vetch) 10 35 25 5 110 5 € of heavy i gvehides,PHs/ 0 - - 0 — — C Median type Two Way Left Turn Lane lRT Channekzed? 0 0 Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 `l.to niguratlon L 7R L TR. tf 1¢Ipstream Signal 0 0 I nor Sheet Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 I T R L T R € olume(veh/h) 70 5 5 5 5 40 } E eak-hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 y Hourly Flow Rate(vehlh) 70 5 5 5 5 40 ' t'proportion of heavy t �t)/ehicles,PIN 0 0 0 0 0 t grade(X) 0 0 i Flared approach N N T Storage 0 0 ) crisi Channelized? 0 0 Canes o 1 o 0 1 o c'^.nfiguaakon _ LTR LTR f ES WB Northbound Southbound 4Aove l 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 ne Configuration L L LTR LTR Volume,v(vph) 10 5 80 50 YF,apacily,cm(vph) 1487 1556 722 890 ( /c ratio 0.01 0.00 0.11 0.06 iL queue length(95%) 0.02 0.01 0.37 0.18 t `l?' trot Delay(slush) 7.4 7.3 10.6 9.3 OS A A B A I delay(s/veh) — — 10.6 9.3 j roach LOS — — B A I (Is2000TM Copyright 02003 University ofNatidt,All Rights Reserved . Veenen 4.11 i () ) 4 ` `'Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of I Ii ` „ TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY t Analyst GC Intersection CR28-FS Ire_r ( k Agency/Co. . ion ` Date Performed 8Q3�06 Analysis Year �ge I i C. Analysis Time Period AM'/? Pro)ed 'EastiWest Stree CR Z8 . , Street F STREET (.�,k)tersection Orientation: - shoHaLePeriod twat 0.25 i (}Major Street Eastbound Westbound I (;,Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 I. T R L T R l (-Volume(vehlh) 10 85 80 5 145 5 I ( Peak-hour factor,PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 (Hourly Flow Rate(veh/h) 10 85 80 5 145 5 (proportion of heavy f t yehides.Puy — 0 — _ I (AMedian type Two Way Left Turn Lane ]RT Channellized? 0 0 Manes 1 1 0 1 1 0 Con L TR L TR. ti ( pstrearn Signal — - 0 0 nor Street Northbound Southbound w ovement 7 8 9 10 11 12 [Wdume(vehth) 50 5 5. 5 5 70 ',Peak-hour factor,PHF r r r r r r 1.00 1.00 1.00 I `l(kourly Flow Rate(vehJh) 50 5 5 5 5 70 1 ((Ptuportiun of heavy r t yehides Pm( r r 0 0 0 1 I (dement grade(%) r 0 Flared approach N I (t,) Storage r 0 ) \RT Channelized? r 0 1.f canes 0 1 0 0 1 0 ' LTR LTR 1 ('Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound i chovement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 I ( ne Configuration L L LTR LTR (;dome,v(vph) 10 5 60 80 GaP•ty. c„(vPhh) 1444 1426 630 859 1 ( lrc ratio 0.01 0.00 0.10 0.09 YY length(95%) 0.02 0.01 0.31 0.31 Delay(shreh) 7.5 7.5 11.3 9.6 C OS A A 8 A I oath delay(s/veh) — — 11.3 9.6 LOS — — B A Ius7aodTM Copyright 02003 Ushers*of Florida,Ail Rights Raened Verson 4.11 I () ! d La I a I t, } Q | S APPENDIX E I 10 IS ( k | S Q w Q Q S . 10 ft | { d { 6 O ! 2 q • . v . ( / C ! | | 0 0 l ( i FULL REPORT ( 1 Analyst GC Intersection 86-7 or Co. Area Type Mother areas ate rme Perfod e2p6 Jurisdiction i Time Period ,PM Analyses Year IX eta — 1 ) r le 4 -' Grsd.- 0 1 I I - - . IC) [ H? ( (i Go.d.• 0 law ;� 4 ` - I = T r i ' R t J i _ 1 (` 1 t � Ii _ F � r I = T R (1 -***\ 1.-Grade=o I 1 = LT _'rte"—I = 1 j Grads=Grads=( -- c - o icier = LTR 1 1 1 I ! EB WB NB SB . :. .. _ LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT r 1/olume(vph) 60 1010 75 180 1065 25 200 80 250 30 135 180 %Heavy veh 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 F (- HF 0.90 0.95 0.90 0.90 0.95 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 F (actuated(P/A) PPPPPPPPPPPP i 'JJEStartup lost time 2.0 2.0 2.O 2.0 2.0 20 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 _ d.e1L 2.0 2.0 20 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 20 20 2.0 type 3 4 3 3 ' 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 a nit Extension 3.O 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.O 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 =ted/Blice/RTOR Volume 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a ne Width 120 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 [ arking(Y or N) N N N N N N N N I Ciparkingthr (,Bus stops/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 lqed timing 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 ( ( ) Excl.Left EW Perm 03 04 NB Only NS Perm 07 08 ° (filmingG= 14.0 G= 50.0 G= G= G= 120 G= 26.0 G = G= T Y= 3 Y= 5 Y= Y= Y= 5 Y= 5 Y= Y= F( (Juration d Analysis(hrs)=0.25 - [ Cycle Length C= 120.0 O F. a t s (�f I Full Report Page 2 of 3 F ( ) I { } "1 i VOLUME ADJUSTMENT AND SATURATION FLOW RATE WORKSHEET c. (, project Description I it . EB WB NB SB ( tc LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT _ TH RT ( `Volume 60 1010 75 180 1065 25 200 80 250 30 135 180 € , �_IPHF 0.90 0.95 0.90 0.90 0.95 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 1 ( , I r Adj. Flora Rate 67 1063- 83 200 1121 28 222 89 278 33 150 200 ( ane Group L T R L T R L T R L T R t - dj.flow rate 67 1063 83 200 1121 28 222 89 278 33 150 200 E C. iProp.LT or RT 0.000 - 0.000 0.000 - 0.000 0.000 - 0.000 0.000 - 0.000 -18ase saltbw 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 I Glum.of lanes 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I� I (w 1.000 1.000 t.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 # 1.000 0.980 1.000 1.000 0.980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 � (Kg 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 k;b 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 I (I.L 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.952 1.000 1.000 0.952 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 I 'dLTI 0.950 1.000 - 0.950 1.000 - 0.950 1.000 - 0.899 1.000 - f (jecondary iLT 0.106 - 0.126 - 0.479 - - r chr . - tom 0.850 - t.000 0.850 - 1.000 0.850 - 1.000 0.850 Siipb • 1.000 1.000 - 1.000 1.000 - 1.000 1.000 - 1.000 1.000 - F`i4'" - 1.000 1.000 - 1.000 1.000 - 1.000 1.000 - 1.000 1.000 �2dj.sallow 1805 3547 1615 1805 3547 1615 1805 1900 1615 1329 1900 1615 (i, c.adj.satlbw 201 - 240 - 911 - - (3 rip r c (? �i i^jFull Report Page 3 of 3 CAPACITY AND LOS WORKSHEET r Project Description EB WB NB $6 1 ( Fine group L T R L T R L T R 1 T R ( J.now rate 67 1063 83 200 1121 28 222 89 278 33 150 200 c- Satflow rate 1805 3547 1615 1805 3547 1615 1805 1900 1615 1329 1900 1615 (-Lost time 2.0 20 2.0 2.0 2.0 20 2.0 2.0 20 2.0 2.0 2.0 :.;Green ratio 0.56 0.42 0.56 0.56 0.42 0.42 0.36 0.36 0.52 0.22 0.22 0.38 1. Lane group cap. 300 1478 902 317 1478 673 416 681 834 288 412 606 ( /c ratio 0.22 . 0.72 0.09 0.63 0.76 0.04 0.53 0.13 0.33 0.11 0.36 0.33 {7Plow ratio 0.30 0.05 0.32 0.02 0.05 0.17 0.02 0.08 0.12 ( merit.lane group NNNNYNNNNNYN 1 ( Sum flow ratios 0.61 (-lost timelcycie 20.00 j EICritical We ratio 0.73 - i i EB WB NB SB f {bane group L T R L T R L T R L T F? I t-jAdj.flow rate 67 1063 83 200 1121 28 222 89 278 33 150 200 i ne group cap. 300 1478 902 317 1478 673 416 681 834 288 412 606 , c ratio 0.22 0.72 0.09 0.63 0.76 0.04 0.53 0.13 0.33 0.11 0.36 0.33 r !Green ratio 0.56 0.42 0.56 0.56 0.42 0.42 0.36 0.36 0.52 0.22 0.22 0.38 cling.delay dl 16.8 29.2 123 18.6 29.8 20.8 28.5 25.9 18.9 37.8 40.0 26.7 { (belay factor k 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 �x rem.delay d2 1.7 3.0 0.2 9.2 3.7 0.1 4.8 0.4 1.1 0.8 2.5 1.5 I ( F factor 1.000 0.876 1.000 1.000 0.876 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 fi Vontrol delay 18.5 28.6 12.5 27.8 29.9 20.9 33.4 26.3 18.0 38.6 424 28.2 Clan group LOS BCB , C C C CC B D D C I c)PPrch•delay 26.9 29.4 25.1 34.7 (f)PProach LOS C C C C 1 c)itersec.delay 28.4 Intersection LOS C i ( Qrnm tM Copyright C 2000 USvaaity of Florida,Al!Ricks Rained Vernon 4.If I ai i ( ) I () 10 [ip f. O &t F :i I I `-)Fu11 Report Page I of 3 FULL REPORT (. GC Intersection 66-7 k nwy or Co. Area Type Al other aroas r Date Performed � Jurisdiction I tine Period A' "lJ Analysis Year EK 10 f5 tJ EI �� Prt.�.. .-'I ..�:.. .. .. :. (T e {( Grades 0 1 1 1 \i`r t i ,J C( Grad.. 0 {( ( 1 Slw Anm £ , 1 / I l . R iO I vL lc ) 1 1 1 (�) I �' : T R A3 Grade. o j I = LT 1 O , a s (=i) IV). idr y = LR 1 4 Grads= 0 it. s = LTR 1 / 1 f C EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT s (iVolume(vph) 220 1045 215 310 1470 50 130 55 180 25 50 100 'f Heavy veh 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 , 0 HF 0.90 0.95 0.90 0.90 0.95 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.80 I `Actuated(P/A) P P P P P P P P P P P P _ I CItartup lost time 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 20 20 20 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 r` etf.9reen 2.0 2.0 2.0 20 20 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0- 2.0 2.0 2.0 type 3 4 3 3 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 _3.0 I ewBa e/RTOR Volume 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 i Width 120 12.0 12.0 120 120 12.0 120 120 12.0 120 12.0 120 1 arking(Y or N) N N N N N N N N arkingNx Il vitas stops/Fir 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 (idled timing 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 Excl.Left EW Perm 03 04 NB Only NS Penn 07 08 1 luing G= 17.0 G= 55.0 G= G= G= 17.0 G= 130 G= G= Y= 3 Y= 5 Y= Y= Y= 5 Y= 5 Y= Y= E ration of Analysis Mrs)=0.25 Cycle Length C= 120.0 I I Id I E (.J I C ) Full Report Page 2 of 3 n VOLUME ADJUSTMENT AND SATURATION FLOW RATE WORKSHEET O EB WB NB SB ( ) LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT I ' olume 220 1045 215 310 1470 50 130 55 180 25 50 100 G ( F 0.90 0.95 0.90 0.90 0.95 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 090 0.90 0.90 E (+. i, i , .j.Flow Rate 244 1100 239 344 1547 56 144 61 200 28 56 111 (-H Lane Group L T R L T R L T R LT R f- • .j.flow rate 244 1100 239 344 1547 56 .144 61 200 28 56 111 t ' Prop.LT or RT 0.000 — 0.000 0.000 — 0.000 0.000 — 0.000 0.000 — 0.000 Base satflow 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 iei I ( um.of lanes 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 f 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 s v 1.000 0.980 1.000 1.000 0.980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 F 9 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 (71p 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 (, 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 ((1r,a 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 LU 1.000 0.952 1.000 1.000 0.952 1.000 '1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 - ( T 0.950 1.000 — 0.950 1.000 — 0.950 1.000 — 0.717 1.000 — s �pecondarytLT 0.069 — 0.143 - 0.583 - - if ty7tT - 1.000 0.850 - 1.000 0.850 - 1.000 0.850 - 1.000 0.850 € 1rLpb 1.000 1.000 — 1.000 1.000 — 1.000 1.000 — 1.000 1.000 — { _I ' _ _ t , — 1.000 1.000 — 1.000 1.000 — 1.000 1.000 — 1.000 1.000 - Itch.saHiow 1805 3547 1615 1805 3547 1615 1805 1900 1615 1363 1900 1615 l' (jsc.adj.sallow 131 — 271 — 11108 — 's — �((LL i 1 0 (.} Full Report Page 3 of 3 ( I ( \) CAPACITY AND LOS WORKSHEET r i 1 Project Descripdon (, EB WB NB _ se C)Lane group LTRL T R L T R 1 T R i ( Adj.flow rate 244 1100 239 344 1547 56 144 61 200 28 56 111 I ( Satflow rate 1805 3547 1615 1805 3547 1615 1805 1900 1615 1383 1900 1615 € •Lost time 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 20 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 i Green ratio 0.63 0.46 0.64 0.63 0.46 0.46 0.29 0.29 0.47 0.11 0.11 0.29 I t. - 0►oup cap. 319 1626 1036 387 1626 740 422 554 767 148 206 471 C /c ratio 0.76 0.68 0.23 0.89 0.95 0.08 0.34 0.11 0.26 0.19- 0.27 0.24 .. 1 C Flow ratio 0.31 0.15 0.44 0.03 0.03 0.12 0.02 0.03 0.07 C.'Crit.lane group N N N N Y N N N N N Y N _ ( ' flow ratios 0.69 s I .. 1-t time/cycle 20.00 . ( dtical v/c ratio 0.82 t 1 EB WB NB SB I _Lane group L T R L T R 1. T R L T R . F j.ltowrate 244 1100 239 344 1547 56 144 61 200 28 56 111 I group cap. 319 1626 1036 387 1626 740 422 554 767 148 206 471 lc ratio 0.76 0.68 0.23 0.89 0.95 0.08 0.34 0.11 0.26 0.19 0.27 0.24 ratio 0.63 0.46 0.64 0.63 0.46 0.46 0.29 0.29 0.47 0.11 0.11 0.29 _ ntf.delay dl 135.2 25.5 9.0 24.2 31.2 18.2 32.8 31.1 18.9 48.7 49.2 32.3 ¢ day factor k 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 I {-kecrem.delay d2 16.0 2.3 0.5 24.9 13.4 0.2 2.2 0.4 0.8 2.8 3.2 1.2 F factor 1.000 0.826 1.000 1.000 0.826 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1 (i.tontrol delay 51.2 23.3 9.6 49.1 39.2 18.4 35.0 31.5 19.7 51.5 524 33.5 I lane group LOS DCAD D BCC B DDC Ipprd1.delay 25.6 40.4 26.9 41.5 l ,Ipproach LOS C D C D I )rtersec.delay 33.4 Intersection LOS C i 6.1520Nni Copyright O2000 University of Florida,AD Rights Reserved Vasioo 4.If t (1 C) 1 F C i 0 0 0 IC) \.i i . Full Report Page 1 of 3 jj FULL REPORT ilklyst Intersection CR 28-CR 7 :ney or Co. Area Type AN other seas 1 ,pD Timeealtae Parkrd Ana Performed is Yw ®63 n Grade = 0 0 I I 1 CI r (' 4 Grade= 0 I (-1 t se. lip. { I = T f lj I at S.' I ' ") = L 1 -1 0 ` 1• r I _ TR i 1. CI Gads o Vi = LT . } = LR Ii Grade= o %fir = LTR r r r ; ' . . I EB WB NB SB LT TN RT LT TN RT LT TH RT LT TH RT 1 9/olume(vph) 10 10 95 230 20 200 35 250 145 60 430 5 c)%Heavy veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 "IPHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 r aced(PIA) PPPPPPPPP PPP al ( tartup loet time 2.0 20 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 .eft.green 2.0 2.0 2.0 20 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 type 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Jnit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 10 10 3A 3.0 10 $edlBike/RTOR Volume 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 t Width 12.0. 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 'rig(Y or N) N N N N N N N N r g stops/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 sl,9ed timing • 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 I 9 WB Only EW Penn D3 04 Exit Left NS Perm 07 08 ( G= 150 G= 17.0 G= G= G= 8.0 G= 45.0 G= Sr rmn9 Y= 0 Y= 5 Y= Y= Y= 5 Y= 5 Y= Y= u ration of Analysis(hrs)=0.25 Cycle Length C= 100.0 I to lo 1O I t Full Report Page 2 of 3 I t 1 I C. VOLUME ADJUSTMENT AND SATURATION FLOW RATE WORKSHEET ( ( i t Duaiplbn • I Cl� EB WB NB SB I "J LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT I t e/olume 10 10 95 230 20 200 35 250 145 60 430 5 I :I'HF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 s i -Adl.Flow Rate 11 11 83 256 22 222 39 - 278 161 67 478 6 ( ne Group L TR L TR L T R L TR i t` ` 1•flow rata 11 94 256 244 39 278 161 67 484 t .p.LT or RT 0.000 - 0.883 0.000 - 0.910 0.000 - 0.000 0.000 - 0.012 t ( s base satilow 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 C um.of lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 t I 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 3 `c' 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 e "_A 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 - I ( '' 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 [b . 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 E - U 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 a J. ' T 0.607 1.000 - 0.950 1.000 - 0.950 1.000 - 0.950 1.000 I r •=ry 1LT 0.509 - 0.290 - 0.470 I iT - 0.868 - 0.864 - 1.000 0.850 - 0.998 I (►.,r!pb 1.000 1.000 - 1.000 1.000 - 1.000 1.000 - 1.000 1.000 - I r4 - 1.000 - 1.000 - 1.000 1.000 - 1.000 I _ I ?)di. satflow 1154 1648 1805 1641 1805 1900 1615 1805 1896 I E (Jae.adj.mellow - 967 - 551 - 894 - l O H J ii Fult Report Page 3 of 3 CAPACITY AND LOS WORKSHEET Description ('it 1 _ - EB WA NB SB ._. 1 ( lane group L TR L TR L T R L TR _ { .j.flow rate 11 94 256 244 39 278 161 67 484 ( Sow rate 1154 1648 1805 1641 1805 1900 1615 1805 1896 i (- • time 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 -= ratio 0.17 0.17 A 0.32 0.32 0.58 0.45 0.65 0.58 0.45 ( Lane group cap. 196 280 435 4 525 420 855 1050 591 853 I /c ratio 0.06 0.34 0.59 0.46 A 0.09 0.33 0.15 0.11 0.57 i - • ratio 0.01 0.06 0.15 4 0.15 0.10 0.26 Zane group N Y N N NNNNY I (_•• m flow rhos 0.49 (_.! ost time/cycle 20.00 f { ritical We ratio 0.61 IEB WS NB SB ` group L TR L TR L T R L TR t j•flowrate 11 94 256 244 39 278 161 67 484 group cap. 196 280 435 525 420 855 1050 591 853 t tic ratio 0.06 0.34 0.59 0.46 0.09 0.33 0.15 0.11 0.57 • (i reen ratio 0.17 0.17 0.32 0.32 0.58 0.45 0.65 0.58 0.45 I d({ .delay dl - 34.8 36.5 27.1 27.2 11.2 17.7 6.8 9.7 20.3 " ay factor k 0.50 0.50 4 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 I em.delay d2 0.5 3.2 5.7 2.9 0.4 1.0 0.3 0.4 2.7 iPF factor 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Control delay 35.3 39.7 32.8 30.1 11.6 18.7 7.1 10.1 23.0 ( group LOS D D C C 8 8 A 8 C rch.delay 39.3 31.5 14.2 21.5 proach LOS D C 8 C itersec.delay 23.6 Intersection LOS C CksraootM Copysigin O 2000 University of Florid.MI Rights Reserved Version 4 I V I 0 f r e Li iiF . O 1U 'Full Report Page l of3 i FULL REPORT • Intersection CR 28-CR 7 € ( •, . or Co. Area Type AM other rues Ir - r me� 8 Jurisdiction Analysis Yearfl)Y 0 ( w__. t Gmde= 0 ._I1 ff GnMa 0 e 1 as Mr. s �' • _ 1 = T a l 1 f (1 r ' ox. R -( (.4 0 � {l l k Grade•0 _ = LT 1. C% it , C ys ( = LR ! ! + GeW.= 0 r r r = LIR s �_`; LT EB WS NB SB TN RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT 1 f /oiume( ) 10 10 50 215 30 180 30 410 355 205 395 5 I /'%Heavy veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (4HF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 _0.90 0.90 0.90 1 ( .uate (P/A) P P P P P P P P P P P _ P (; taK lost� up e 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 20 t (ie 1.Imo n 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 3 3 xtens nit3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Eion 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 jed/Bike/RTOR Volume 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 e ifione Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 120 120 12.0 12.0 12.0 9 g corking(YofN) N N N N N N N N `u}}arkingthr g clue stops/Iv 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 I teed timing 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 9 WB Only EW Perm 03 04 Exd.Left NS Penn x=07 08 'suing G= 15.0 G = 19.0 G= G= G= 7.0 G= 44.0 G= G= $ Y= 0 Y= 5 Y= Y= Y= 5 Y= 5 Y= Y= +ration GlAnelysis(hrs)=0.25 iICycle Length C= 100.0 F It ) pE !C.1 L j``) { `l 1 ' 'FullR� � Page 2 of 3 ( .,i VOLUME ADJUSTMENT AND SATURATION FLOW RATE WORKSHEET I ( }PrOled Demotion S ( EB WB NB BB }€ l } LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT E ( )Volume 10 10 50 215 30 180 30 410 355 205 1 395 5 `s - PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.00 0.90 0.90 0.00 0.90 1 E_P Adj.Flow Rate 11 11 44 239 33 200 33 456 394 228 439 6 E (" ne Group L TR L TR L T R L TR a E 4Adj.flow rate 11 55 239 233 33 456 394 228 445 ' ::Prop.LT or RT 0.000 - 0.800 0.000 - 0.858 0.000 - 0.000 0.000 - 0.013 s • li iBase satflow 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 I (l;Num.of lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 (:i W 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 V 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1 1--Al 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1 (IP 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 i ( bb 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 I a 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 a IU 1.000 1.000 - 1.000 1.000 - 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 (it T 0.613 1.000 0.950 1.000 0.950 1.000 0.950 1.000 i (4' dary tT - 1 (juecon - - 0.624 - 0.316 - 0.306 - {(t RT. 0.880 0.871 1.000 0.850 0.998 1pb 1.000 1.000 - 1.000 1.000 - 1.000 1.000 - 1.000 1.000 - 1.000 - 1.000 - 1.000 1.000 - 1.000 _ ndj.radio* 1166 1672 1805 1655 1805 1900 1615 1805 1896 j (lam.adj.salfbw - 1186 - 600 - 582 - (> 0 ; f ( F .) + ` Full Report Page 3of3 I ' i U i CAPACITY AND LOS WORKSHEET ( . Project Description t ) = [ EB WB NB SB I )Lane9rWP L TR _ L TR L T R L TR i t )AdJ.flow rate 11 55 239 233 33 456 394 228 445 gi ( )Satflow tale 1166 1672 1805 1655 1805 1900 1615 1805 1896 ( tom 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Green ratio 0.19 0.19 0.34 0.34 0.56 0.44 0.64 0.56 0.44 'Lane group cap. 222 318 496 583 420 836 1034 411 834 I {_'v/c ratio 0.05 0.17 0.48 0.41 0.08 0.55 0.38 0.55 0.53 i k-Flow ratio 0.01 0.03 0.14 0.24 0:24 0.23 I (: •lane P N Y N N N Y N NIN I (, um flow ratios 0.48 (%Lost time/cycle 20.00 vic ratio �_' 0.59 f EB WB NB SB . f Lane group L TR L TR L T R L TR ;Adj.flow rate 11 55 239 233 33 456 394 228 445 i Om 9rouP caP• 222 318 496 563 420 836 1034 411 834 (preen ratio 0.05 0.17 0.48 0.41 0.08 0.55 0.38 0.55 0.53 € `Breen ratio 0.19 0.19 0.34 0.34 0.56 0.44 0.64 0.56 0.44 i nIf.delaydi 33.1 33.9 25.1 25.3 11.6 20.6 8.6 13.5 20.5 I i ay factor k 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 - 19ncrem.delay d2 0.4 1.2 3.3 2.2 0.4 26 1.1 . 5.3 2.4 C (,.�F faces 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1 ( trol delay 33.5 35.1 28.5 27.6 120 23.2 9.6 18.8 229 (1ane group LOS C D C C B C A B C 1 (lpprch.delay 34.8 28.0 16.7 21.5 pproach LOS C C B C cntersec.delay 21.4 Intersection LOS C (' i_ �TM dit*Ccc O2000 University of Florida,AR Rights Reserved Version/.t( 4 (,) (.) I - 1 t7 I 11 . . [4{ ( 1 f o!' `•'Full Report Page 1 of 3 FULL REPORT GC Intersection 1195 in .H . - or Co. Area Type All outer areas Date Performed -de 2478 Jurisdiction PeriotrY d 1:171 Analysis Year IX f0150 et Gam. ° 1 0 2 ti (1 Grade 1 ° (e) 1�oattcAlk.r t` - \-... t = T . l 1 t f ( 1. \ = R ('I 3 —i �— J Y 4 L . ( E ° ` jji I 1 a it" � { t , ALT iI 1. ° 0 0 = LiR f I ( EB WB NB SB C LT TH AT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH AT (volume(vph) 130 2360 3575 100 385 250 ) f%Heavy veh 2 3 3 2 2 2 € t HE 0.90 0.95 0.95 0.90 0.90 0.90 /A) P P P P P P rtup lost time 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 t (4:1 et green 2.0 20 2.0 , 2.0 20 20 rt rival type 3 5 5 3 3 3 (at Extension 3.0 3.0 10 10 3.0 3.0 jed/Bike/R 0 0 TOR Volume 0 0 0 40 , ane Width 12.0 120 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 (Tacking(Y or N) N N N N N N N N Vatting/11r (vi° us stopsAr 0- 0 0 0 0 0 tiring 3.2 3.2 3.2 9 EB Only EW Perm 03 04 SB Only 06 07 08 Q . G= 8.0 G= 83.0 G= G= G= 19.0 G= G= G= • 1'3 Y= 0 Y= 5 Y= Y= Y= 5 Y= �r5UY= Y= of A�y�(his)=0.25 Cycle Length C= 120.0 1 () iU ' 'Full Report Page 2 of 3 is ( VOLUME ADJUSTMENT AND SATURATION FLOW RATE WORKSHEET C.Project Description i fi EB WB NB SB f a LT TH RT LT TN RT LT TH RT LT TH RT (Volume 130 2350 3575 100 385 250 st.i �.PHF 0.90 0.95 0.95 0.90 0.90 0.90 I (adj.Flow Rate 144 2474 3763 111 428 233 t i- plane Group L T T R L I? `+dj.flow rate 144 2474 3763 111 428 233 -(Prop.LT or RT 0.000 - 0.000 0.000 - 0.000 - - I 1 C''..-11-t- _ I sat0w 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 ' um.of lanes 1 3 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 2 0 1 I (IN 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 i V 0.980 0.971 10.971 0.980 0.980 0.980 } I c 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 i (JP 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 i ( b 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 E F Is) 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 F,.� U 1.000 0.908 0.908 1.000 0.971 1.000 - (" T 0.950 1.000 - 1.000 - - 0.950 - i . (.4econdary f.T 0.048 - - - - xt - 1.000 - - 1.000 0.850 - - 0.850 1.000 1.000 1.000 - 1.000 - - 1.000 - 1.000 1.000 - - 1.000 +dj.satflow 1770 5025 5025 1583 3437 1583 Sec.adj.sallow 90 — — — — t 7. 1' Itoi t I - ( ) 11 'Full Report Page 3 of 3 i t CAPACITY AND LOS WORKSHEET . ES wB NB SB _ ( •Lane group L T T R L R r • j.flow rate 144 2474 3763 111 _ 428 233 Satflow rate 1770 5025 5025 1583 3437 1583 t. Lost time 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 20 2.0 _ reen ratio 0.76 0.76 0.69 0.89 0.16 .2.0 E_jLane group cap. 180 3811 3476 1412 544 ` 422 jv/c ratio 0.80 0.65 1.08 0.08 0.79 0.55 jFlow ratio 0.49 0.76 0.07 _0 12 0.15 'Grit. lane group N N Y N N Y N N (-.jSum flow ratios 0.94 ( 'Lost time/cycle 15.00 (( Critical v/c ratio 1.07 ``1 EB WB NB SB {Lane group L T T R L R -lAdj.flow rate 144 2474 3783 111 428 233 I group cap- 180 3811 .3476 1412 544 422 lc ratio 0.80 0.65 1.08 0.08 0.79 0.55 ~ j -i5 Green ratio 0.76 0.76 0.69 0.89 0.16 0.27 f �IUnif.delay dl 4Q 2 6.9 18.5 0.8 48.6 37.8 a t (ibelay factor k 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 nc rem. delay d2 30.0 0.9 43.0 0.1 11.0 5.1 1 factor 1.000 0.207 0.398 1.000 1.000 1.000 1 (- �; _ 1 ontrol delay 70 2 2.3 50.4 0.9 59.5 43.0 s (.mane group LOS E A O A E D t €. perch.delay 6.0 49.0 53.7 (Approach LOS A D D I 1 Q terser. delay ' 33.7 Intersection LOS C t (,+CS200OTM Copyright 02000 University or flaida,M Rights Reserved Venice 4.1t i ( t F �,: i U O fi t t iii l ` k) i '- ' FuD Report Page 1 of 3 FULL REPORT I ( - — - i • -tyst GC Intersection 119-5 1/2 ( . •;ncy or Co. Area Type All other woes ( •- e Performed 82 t.: Jurisdiction t ne Period 'T AM� Year EXl01 2 0 . Grade« ° 1 ° 2 £ �awnww■w■■■ (111■�Ji■■iilfry li■■/�■�/■1 k._ 1■■■■■■■■■ti titer- o 1 1■■Itt■i■■t#� 1■■■i■■■/■� Shoal 4 1 tww■iwww = T 1■I>i/_7■� �w��t ( _it ■/ra■■rl ( Hfifll■■■! 3 1■C��■� fliifl:��i■� 3 . f ' °'". 1i■fllH■1 ■■H■■Ilsl = L Ntlt�■■/1 /H■.=■I ° s 1 f��iH■t1 �H��■mil ° T R 3 ��taltaltts�s t;t�taslt;lti�t a 1 (') Grande.« 0 vi �� ■i■■tit■■til t LT k ; ■■/■i■■HI ti■■■■*■■■f111 I I,■H■■■ y = L R t/t■■■■■■tl 1 filip 0 0 0 Grade« vie,w LTR ri 3 EB VVB NB SB _ If � LT TH RT LT TH ` RT LT TH RT LT TH RT ( /olume(vph) 280 3820 2870 325 185 175 _ . (, %Heavy veh 2 3 3 2 — 2 - 2 f I1 HF 0.90 0.95 0.95 0.90 0.90 0.90 .. _ (P/A) P P P P 1 (' p lost time 2.0 2.0 , 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 ( '(t.eff.green 20 2 - ,2.0 20 2.0 2.0 A type 3 5 5 3 3 3 iffSriit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 i ( �ed/817Ce/RTOR Volume 0 0 0 O - 0 3.0 40 bane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 i s rl parking(Y or N) N N N J N N N N N arkinglhr stops/hr 0 ' 0 0 0- i 0 0 cf,led timing f X 3.2 3.2 3.2 (1.7 EB Only EW Penn 03 04 SB Only 06 07 08 (-A ing G= 22.0 G= 87.0 G = G= G= 21.0 G= G = G = i Y= 0 Y= 5 Y= Y= Y= 5 Y= Y= Y= figuration of Analysis(hrs)=0.25 t � Cycle Length C = 120.0 i 1� O .1 t O II j Full Report Page 2 of 3 VOLUME ADJUSTMENT AND SATURATION FLOW RATE WORKSHEET 1 ( )Project Description ES WB NB se 1 i j LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Volume 280 3820 2870 325 185 175 . `PHF 0.90 0.95 0.95 0.90 0.90 0.90 ('tAdj. Flow Rate 311 4021 3021 361 206 150 I (Ilene Group 1. T T R L R I (.3 F (jAdj.flow rate 311 4021 3021 361 206 150 Prop.LT or RT 0.000 - 0.000 0.000 - 0.000 - 1 ( : : sallow 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 (_.glum.of lanes 1 3 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 2 0 1 yy(.;p j 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1. tODIV 0.980 0.971 0.971 0.980 0.980 0.980 ' I. ( 9 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 F 'OP 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 ( 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 ('FLU 1.000 0.908 0.908 1.000 0.971 1.000 K (;:1 0.950 1.000 - 1.000 - - 0.950 - E ndary RT 0.060 - - t ( - - - 8 1�T 1.000 1.000 0.850 0.850 € 1.000 1.000 — 1.000 — 1.000 (I- 1 (1111511 — 1.000 — 1.000 1.000 — — 1.000 i (ldj.Waved 1770 5025 5025 ([ sat 3437 1583 Il°)ec.adj.satflow 111 — — — — . C, 1 sit ' yE 11. F O I ( 1 i l `'' I)Full Report- Page 3 of 3 ( _i C. CAPACITY AND LOS WORKSHEET i 1 ES WB NB SB {:.'Lane Group L _ T i T R L R ( .Adj.flow rate _311 4021 3021 361 206 150 ( ;Satflow rate 1770 5025 5025 1583 3437 1583 _ {_ Lost time 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 t-(Green ratio 0.74 0.74 0.56 0.77 _ 0.17 r 0.40 (Lane group cap. 387 3727 2806 1227 601 633 _lv/c ratio 0.80 1.08 L08 0.29 0.34 0.24 t-°Flaw ratio 0.80 0.60 0.23 0.06 0.09 -l'_rit lane group N Y ' N N i N Y N N i . um flow ratios 0.86 {{ t L ost time/cyde 10.00 ( r 'tied vie ratio 0.94 EB WB NB SB clfane group L T T R L R 1Adj.flow rate 311 4021 3021 361 206 150 'Pane group cap. 387 3727 2806 1227 601 633 `'v/c ratio 0.80 1-08 1.08 0.29 0.34 0.24 tureen ratio 0.74 -0.74 0.56 0.77 0.17 0.40 j Jnif. delay dl 38.3 15.5 26.5 3.9 43.4 23.9 �> ay factor k 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 _ 0.50 0.50 cincrem.delay d2 16.1 41.2 41.9 0_6 1.6 0-9 (-t)*factor 1.000 0.464 0.267 1.000 1.000 1.000 ontrol delay 54.4 48.4 49.0 4.5 45.0 24.7 c2ane group LOS 0 D D A D C i (1Apprch.delay r 48.8 44.2 36.5 (..cIpproach LOS D 0 0 s>tersec.delay 46.3 Intersection LOS D ` r 00000 copyright 0 2000 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved version 4-I l f x )i (1 : O (.) ............. ... . `_;`Two-way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 1^. TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY GC , .. CR7-BSTREET to Performed � is Year IX 101 el, Time Period 4 Wn4 IProject Description i tlWest Street: B S7 tee r . , . , Street CR 7 Intersection Orientation: North-South ;;i;� Period hrs 0.25 '- or Street Northbound Southbound ( . ement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R flume 0 305 5 15 230 0 (. eak-Hour Factor,PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 4 ( Flow Rate,HFR 0 305 5 15 230 0 ercent Heavy Vehicles 0 — — 0 — ,_ ian Type Two Way Lett Turn Lane i Channelized 0 0 ( lanes 0 1 0 1 1 0 configuration 1R L T {Ypstream Signal 0 0 '-mor Street Westbound Eastbound (Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume30 0 70 0 0 0 ( k-Hour Factor,PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 t rly Flow Rate,HFR 30 0 70 0 0 0 r lercent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 cent Grade(%) 0 0 ed Approach N N 1 &'forage 0 0 T Channelized 0 0 =nes 0 0 0 0 0 0 i tion LR 7 proach NB SB Westbound Eastbound I zovement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 ) ne Configuration L LR )(vph) 15 100 (y(m)(vph) 1262 677 ) (w;/c 0.01 0.15 € 2JS%queue length 0.04 0.52 l l/ontrol Delay 7.9 11.2 I (;SOS A B r t )pproach Delay — — 11.2 t .roach LOS — — B l -ghts Reserved Doom Copyright 02003 Uivarity of Florida,AR Rights Ripened Van 4.1f 1 Vesta;4.1f f t U 1 ( 'Two-Way Stop Control Page I of I I C TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY hist GC .-r. CR 7-B STREET 1 /Cm ictlon I r ,Date Performed : r .s. -. ysisYear sr tot 5& O© . Time Period AMP Protect Description I EastlWest Street: B STREET . i Street: CR 7 I Intersection Orientation: North-South 'r . Period : O. • •r Street Northbound Soulhbourd t (, ovement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R t. T R t oiume 0 430 30 60 510 0 ." eak-Hour Factor,PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 i urly Row Rate,HFR 0 430 30 60 510 0 i - Heavy Vehicles 0 - - 0 — — I { edian Type Two Way Left Turn Lane I ()c2T Channeized 0 0 I (Panes 0 1 0 1 1 0 ` tguration 7R L T i TUpstreamStnal 0 0 '1Ninor Street Westbound Eastbound • I (yf�-_,vement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R i 'IVoiume 20 0 40 0 0 0 [ Hots Factor,PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 [ Flow Rate,HFR 20 0 40 0 0 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 01 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade(%) 0 0 (Flared Approach N N • forage 0 0 C (xtanrielized 0 0 \ Ganes - 0 0 0 0 0 0 - •nfiguration LR :•roach NB SB Westbound Eastbound 9tovemen1 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 ne Cordguretion L LR i(Wh) 60 60 [ I,(m)(vph) 1112 500 1 "r/c 0.05 0.12 1 N115%Queue length 0.17 0.41 i Y;ontrol Delay 8A 13.2 icios A B @ ()pry Delay — 13.2 $ 5pproach LOS — — 8 'fights Reserved E TM Copyright 02007 Umanityornwi*All Rights Reamed Version lit Version 4.If t U U , I - wo-Way Stop Control Page 1 of I 1 ( TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY `_, Analyst GC Intersection CR 28-D STREET i t, ' Agency/Co. Jurisdiction ( Date Performed 3/2006 Analysis Year 1015®63 r- Analysis Time Period ei PM 1Description } -4East/West CR 2B Street DSTi4EET (_NMersection Orientation: East-West Period Ors : an 1 (`M! Street Eastbound Westbound ovement 1 2 3 4 5 6 1. L T R L T R _ ( Volume(vehlh) 20 195 • 0 0 310 5 (- eak-hour factor,PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 L. ourly Flow Rate(vehfi) 20 195 0 0 310 5 (proportion of heavy (, hides,PMv 0 — — 0 — — ?Median type Two Way Leff Turn Lane : 1ftT Channelized? 0 0 - Manes 1 1 0 0 1 0 a (1:i configuration L T TR. . r'M or EIMSt Signal 0 0 loon Stream Northbound Southbound ent 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R I plume(veh/h) 0 0 0 5 0 100 I peak-hour factor,PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 (sourly Flow Rate(vehlh) 0 0 0 5 0 100 ) ()'roportion of heavy 0 0 0 0 0 0 I (yehkies, PM, Iercent grade(%) 0 0 ,tS1ared approach N N titStorage 0 0 T Channellzed? 0 0 anes 0 0 0 0 0 0 yonfiguration LR Approach ES WB Northbound Southbound ement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Vane Configuration L LR Volume,v(vph) 20 105 _ lapacity, cm(vph) 1257 724 i I- ( c ratty 0.02 0.15 Queue length(95%) 0.05 0.51 I 1 f;pntrol Delay(sNyeh) 7.9 10.8 gOS A B E iirmoaathch delay level) — — 10.8 e LOS B 16%200 M Copyright 02003 uSvc rq ofFlaar,M Rights Roland Vauoo 4.11 IO a '' O J l^3Two-Way Stop Control Page lof1 I r TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst... GC Intersection`' a?28-O STREET - Agency/Co. Jurisdiction ( Date Performed 8/2 .0r. Analysis Year 101 O 1 -1 Analysis Tina Period AM O 1 Project Description ast/West Street: CR 28 . • . I Ste: 0 STREET C Intersection Orientation: West 3 ter- --Period : 0.25 (. )or Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 8 R L T R f ( olume(veNh)- 105 500 0 0 395 20 I •eak-hour factor,PNF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 - ourly Flow Rate(vehihq 105 500 0 0 395 20 E Cis roportion of heavy 4' chides,PM, 0 — — 0 — — — edian type Two Way Left Turn Lane I f RT Channef¢ed? 0 rc. nes 1 1 0 0 1 0 I C tonfguration L T — TR. pstream Signal 0 _ 0 inor Street Northbound Southbound 1W)ovemert 7 8 1 9 10 I 11 I 12 lume(veh/h) 0 0 0 5 L T R 5 s *Peak-hour factor,PI-IF 1.00 0 0 J.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Aoudy Flow Rate(vehlh) 0 0 0 5 0 75 i portion of heavy 0 0 0 0 0 0 t chides, P� ('percent grade(%) 0 0 - I f _ Storage 0 0 cAT Channelized? ?sines 0 0 0 0 onfiguraton 0 0 0 LR , • �• iuent.proach EB WB Northbound Southbound _ 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 6 % are Configuration L ()dun*,v(vph) 105 80 R parity,cm(vph) 1155614 I ( lc ratio 0.09 0.13 Li tmus length(95%) 0.30 0.45 i / g rol Delay(s/veh) 8.4 11.7 A B i *Sig ( ) — — € LOS 11.7 B ill E CaW'ridr 02003 Urratiy ofFlwidl,All Rights Remand Verson s.i(1 O , 11 / / , Two-Way Stop Control Page I of 1 Or y TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY t . s Analyst GC intersection CR28-FSTREET l , ACIewliett Jurisdiction ( Date Performed Analysis Year 15 5 O lim e me Period AP AI „._,Project Description _ t EastWeM Street CR 28 Street F STREET ( intersection Orientatlorc East-Weal (hrs): 0.25 t`14alcr$trset Eastbound Westbound e, _. Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 I {fi L T R L T R cz1.1Vdume(vehlh) 40 90 50 5 165 5 1Peakdrax(actor,PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 curly Flow Rate(vehih) 40 90 50 5 165 5 ct roportion of heavy 0 — — 0 ehides,PM — — edlan type Two Way Left Turn Lane (RT Channeiaed? - 0 0 hands 1 1 0 I 1 cronrfilurslion L TR L TR. :dream S�nal 0 0 ins or StreetNorthbound Southbound a ovement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R olume(vet/h) 95 30 30 5 10 40 teak-hour factor,PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 hourly Flow Rate(veh/h) 95 30 30 5 10 40 O'roportion of heavy 0 0 0 0 0 0 I hides,PM 'ercent 9< (%) 0 0 Flared approach N N r° Storage 0 0 i `ttT Channelzed? 0 0 apes 0 1 0 0 1 0 a CLTR LTR 4 1 1 oath EB WB Northbound Southbound Aovement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 Vane Configuration L L LTR LTR 1 E jdume,v(vph) 40 5 155 55 1 trashy,ca(vph) 1420 1456 624 768 t Up ratio 0.03 0.00 0.25 0.07 ''hreue length(95%)- 0.09 0.01 0.98 0.23 I �i'orrirol Delay(s/veh) 7.6 7.5 12.7 10.0 ' ° COS A A B 8 lIipprztch delay(s/veh) — — 12.7 10.0 LOS _ — — B 8 I0S2000'~ CM,*02003 Uai arty of Paid.,AR Rides Reserved Vase 4.1r ' i"'Two-Way Stop Control . Page 1 of 1 ( Y TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst GC intersection CR 28-F STREET A9encY�- Jurisdiction Date Performed 8223/1006 Analysis Year 1 Ott -I , , Analysis Time Period A__(1 3 i— Project Description ( •East/West Street: CR 28 • , , Street: F STREET (;Intersection d F. ,i . : East-Nest i Period(hrs): 0.25 ( t .j (_ Major Street „�nwR► ( ' ( Volume vehlh r 205 110 25 V5 , € Peak-hour factor,PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Nay Flow Rate(veldh) 40 205 110 25 215 10 ( ' .portion of heavy , ( vehicles,P• M, 0• — — 0 — — Median type Two Way Left Turn Lane ` RT Channelized? 0 0 s :L anes 1 1 0 1 1 0 I Configuration L 7R L TR. 4pstream Signal 1., O 0 IEr nor Street Northbound Southbound y ovement 7 8 9 10 11 12 I L T R L T R i olume(vehlh) 80 10 20 5 60 60 .�eak-hour ,factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 oury Flow Rate(veh/h) 80 10 20 5 60 60 opofion of heavy 0 0 0 0 0 0 c,ehldes,PHv € do a(ya) 0 0 fared approach N N i( Storage 0 0 'T Channelized? 0 0 nes o 1 0 0 1 0 sguratron LTR LTR £.. - '. ` e Approach EB , .. WB . . . Northbound Southbound 7 8 9 10 ane Configuration L L LTR LTR 12 I (i (Volume,v(vph) 40 25 110 125 f;opacity,c,,,(vph) 1356 1257 446 572 ( t tic rata 0.03 0.02 0.25 0.22 'queue length(95%) 0.09 0.06 0.96 0.83 i + ntrol Delay(sNeh) 7.7 7.9 15.7 13.0 Yr'OS A A C B f roach doles(s/veh) — 15.713.0 e _ ch LOS - - C 8 8 1 ('52000 Cbpyrittia a 2003 University ofHnldt,Al Kith Referred vwt a,,4.11 I• ( Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 i I ,ti TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY •nit GC • • CR 261/2-CR 7 z r Date Performed X3/1006 . Year Analysis Time Period 6tgJ�PM (T oject Desaiption 1 EastMest Street CR 261/2 ' . i . . Street CR 7 t� Intersection Orientation: North-South ;mop Period 'hers: 0.25 ( Jot Street Northbound Southbound I '(-Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R I T R ( 3vo1ume 0 305 185 340 235 0 ( Peak-Hour Factor,PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ' flto urty Flow Rate,HFR 0 305 185 340 235 0 E `7Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 - - 0 — — (14edian Type Two Way Left Tun Lane i ( RT Channefzed 0 0 I �lLanes 0 1 1 1 1 0 t f-�Qonfiguration T R L T sipstreem Signal 0 0 inor Street Westbound Eastbound E f}tovement 7 8 9 10 11 12 { L - T R L T R g/olume 150 0 205 0 0 0 § k-Hour Factor,PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 i uriy Flow Rate,HFR 150 0 205 0 0 0 percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 g ercent Grade(%) 0 0 dared Approach N N l ()forage 0 0 IT Channeiized 0 0 ' es 1 0 1 0 0 0 I Conf ration L R Cproach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 - ne Configuration L L R " (wh) 340 150 205 (m)(vPh) 1084 225 740 Elc 0.31 0.67 0.28 1 %queue length 1.35 4.16 1.13 i r nirol Delay 9.8 48.1 11.7 • { S A E B i approach Delay — — 27.1 proach LOS — — D ;roach Reserved O00TM Copyright O 2003 urnwdly of flo i ,All Rights Rognal Vat 4 If Vaiww 4.11 I �l i ( t IC) `Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 , r TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst • GC Intersection CR 261/2-CR 7 k ,Agency/Co. Jurisdiction t"rte tat. Analysis Year O 6 w Li Project Description ! r h Easi/West Street: OR 261/2 Street CR 7 Intersection Orientation: North South Period 0.25 _ ., (-'Major Street Northbound Southbound t_',Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 t L T R L T R 'Volume 0 665 220 245 355 0 (:Peak-Hour Factor,PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ()Hourly Flow Rate,HFR 0 665 220 245 355 0 ( Percent Heavy Vehicles , 0 — — 0 — — Median Type TWO Way Left Tire Lane (ART Channelized 0 0 {Lanes 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 lConfiguuration T R L T I ' Upstream Signal 0 0 ()Minor Street Westbound Eastbound ('Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 ) ( L T R L T R --jVolume 100 0 130 0 0 0 eak-Hotr Factor,PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flow Rate,HFR 100 0 130 0 0 0 ((,Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 s c iPercent Grade(%) 0 0 eared Approach N N ¢ torage 0 0 i ( T Channelized 0 0 1 c1pines 1 0 1 0 0 0 8 Conflgurafiorh L R Cam; — i• ..roach NB SB Westbound Eastbound ovement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Qane Configuration L L R £ (((tty(Wh) 245 100 130 I (�1, (m)(Wh) 773 207 464 �1'v/c 0.32 . 0.48 0.28 ) (b5%queue length 1.36 2.38 1.14 i CI- ',toned Delay 11.8 37.6 15.8 I i (.OS B E C j r . . oath Delay — — 25.3 e ( Approach LOS — — D (( Tights Reserved i MaTM Copyright O 2003 Universityof Florida.Al Rig tamed Rights Roed Version tit Vasian 4.If ) _' i ii I 'Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of I I - TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst GC Intersection CR 281/2-1 STREET t k Agency/Co. Jurisdiction [ ( Date Performed 8123/2006 Analysis Yearet Xi Analysis e Period a PM _I - I sed Description t/West CR 281/2 . , Street !STREET -1 ( nterseelbn Orientation. East-Wbat � it Period . 025 Ic ajor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 8 t L T R L T R ()Volume(veh/h) 0 80 35 5 240 0 `s AAPeak-hour factor,PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 dy Flow Rate(veh/h) 0 80 35 5 240 0 %-. of- heavy 4 hides,PHv 0 - - 0 - - € i- ≤ Median type Tan Wey Left Turn Lane t ' (HT Charnelized? 0 0 t E.-ttanes 0 1 1 i 0 1 0 fguration T R LT € c1Pp stream Signal 0 _ . 0 mor Street Northbound 1 Southbound t -povement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Wdume(vehlh) 120 0 5 _ 0 0 0 E /,eak-dour factor,PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1Houurly Flow Rate(vehfh) 120 0 5 0 0 0 t (r onofhe� 0 0 0 0 0 0 f vehicles,PHy j'yercent grade(%) 0 0 I ?Flared+ N N FY Storage o 0. ykT Channelized? 0 0 f ,lanes 0 o o 0 0 0 ) f •n . ration LR WB Northbound Southbound I (n t • emenl 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 (Jane Configuration LT LR i Volume,v(vph) 5 125 _ tr c capacity.c,, (vph) 1487 696 r/c ratio 0.00 0.18 ortrd ue length(95%) 0.01 0.65 Delay(s/veh) 7.4 11.3 OS A B delay( h) — — 11.3 4 proach LOS — — g E snooty comae 2003 Uiwaiy of Freida,All Rights Reserved Vain 4.11 1 ( f a li J C)Two-Way Stop Control Page I of I } TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY (3� Analyst GC Intersection CR 26-I STREET t I Agency/Co. .Nriu bore () Date Performed &2 06 Analysis Year 25 O _i {_. Analysis Time Period i Project Description . I I. EastiWest Street: CR 261/2 • , • I Street: !STREET C. Intersection Oriental= East-144W Period 0.25 - -- - - Mader Street Eastbound Westbound ( 'Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 ( L T R L T R I ( Volume(veh/h) 0 245 140 5 150 0 J - Peak-to factor,PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ( Peak-hour. 'Hourly Ftow Rate(vehlh) 0 245 140 5 150 0 i ( .Proportion of heavy 0 _ — 0 1 (- vehtdes,PM — — -- Median type Tao Way Le fl Turn Lane 's RT Channefized? 0 0 (-` rues 0 1 1 0 1 0 ( (4 ration T R LT lLlU�pstream Sisal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound i CjMovement 7 8 9 10 11 12 atyi L T R L T R plume(veh/h) 75 0 5 0 0 0 Peak-hour factor,PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flow Rate(vetu/hi 75 0 5 0 0 0 "J.,(cm) of heavy (ireh� PHv 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y lI�d grade h - 0 0 F epproadt N N € t-e Storage 0 0 1 Q T Channetzed? 0 0 `'y}"panes 0 0 0 0 0 0 i r lion (R I EB WB Northbound Southbound ¢ YAovement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 4 (pane Configuration LT LR lolumue,v(vph) 5 80 r— . e�epadly.cm(Wh) 1185 682 t F` c rato 0.00 0.12 ueue length(95%) 0.01 0.41 Delay(shah) 8.1 11.2 claS A B delay(stveh) — — 11.2 I preach LOS , 4 — — B ( s2a Pl capriole,2003 University of Florida,M RirNs Reserved Vaa.00 4.If { U` Hello