HomeMy WebLinkAbout810772.tiff RESOLUTION
RE: APPROVAL OF SITE PLAN - LOT 9 , ALTHEN-BOYER COMMERCIAL
UNIT DEVELOPMENT - TOM FOSTER AND RON VAUGHT
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County,
Colorado, pursuant to Colorado statute and the Weld County Home
Rule Charter, is vested with the authority of administering the
affairs of Weld County, Colorado, and
WHEREAS, on March 23, 1981, the Board of County Commis-
sioners of Weld County, Colorado heard the application of Tom
Foster and Ron Vaught for approval of the Site Plan for Lot 9 ,
Althen-Boyer Commercial Unit Development, located in part of
the Southwest Quarter of Section 23, Township 1 North, Range
68 West of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado, and
WHEREAS, the Weld County Department of Planning Services
has recommended approval of said Site Plan for Lot 9 , Althen-
Boyer Commercial Unit Development subject to the following:
1. The applicants providing on-site water
storage of 25,000 gallons for fire pro-
tection purposes in accordance with the
recommendations of the Dacono Fire Pro-
tection District.
2 . The applicants amending the site plan
map to show the location of the water
storage tank.
3. The Development Standards for the site
plan.
4 . No building or electrical permits being
issued on the site plan area until the
Development Standards for the site plan
have been placed on the site plan plat
and said plat being delivered to the
offices of the Department of Planning
Services.
5. The Dacono Fire Protection District ap-
proving the location of all fire pro-
tection facilities, including hydrants
or water storage tanks . (Development
Standard #9)
/�. h.. • / .� 810 77 2
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Com-
missioners of Weld County, Colorado that the aforementioned appli-
cation for approval of the site plan for Lot 9 , Althen-Boyer
Commercial Unit Development be, and hereby is, approved.
The above and foregoing Resolution was , on motion duly made
and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the 23rd day of
March, A.D. , 1981 .
" • , BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
ATTEST: `Trfh+�. t arn> WELD COUNTY, COLORADO
Weld County Clerk and Recorder 0�...•., _ (Aye)
/and rk to the Boar$ _ Ch ck Carlsoi1, Chairman__ ABSENT DATE SIGNED (Aye)
eputy Cou y""Clerk j Norman Carlson, Pro-Tem
6/
APPROVED AS TO FORM: liiilzAly (Aye)
IZit: 9 ` // � C. W. Kirby /
Co my Attorney ABSENT DATE SIGNED (Aye)
J h�n� T. Martin
-1171 e/l kn (Aye)
ne K. Steinmark
DATE PRESENTED: MARCH 25, 1981
9,5,
iarc�i 23,
r-_�
1!E : Torn Foster and Ron V'auaht
REQUEST: Site Plan, Lot 9, Althen-Boyer Commercial Unit Development
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: part of the SWµ, Section 23, TIN, R68W
LOCATION: 2 miles west and 3 miles south of Dacono on the west side of 1-25
THE DE•PAP.TENT OF PLANNING SERVICES STAFF P.ECO.•`_ !E.',)S TEAT THIS
REQUEST BE approved FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS:
1 . The proposed use complies with the uses permitted for the Althen-Boyer _
Commercial Unit Development as outlined in the Development Standards for
the Planned Unit Development. _
2. The Weld County Health Department has set forth no objections to this
request provided the applicant complies with the stipulations contained
in its letter dated March 4, 1981 .
3. The Weld County Engineering Department has indicated that there are no
engineering problems anticipated by this request.
The Department of Planning Services staff recommendation for approval is
conditional ' upon the following:
I . The applicants providing on-site water storage of 25,000 gallons
for fire protection purposes in accordance with the recommendations
of the Dacono Fire Protection District.
2. The applicants amending the site plan map to show the location of the
water storage tank.
3. The attached Development Standards being recommended and approved for
the site plan.
4. No building or electrical permits being issued on the site plan
area until the Development Standards for the site plan have been
placed on the site plan plat and said plat has been delivered to the
offices of the Department of Planning Services. -
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
TOM FOSTER and RON VAUGHT
I . The permitted uses on the hereon described property within the Commercial
Unit Development shall be those uses as listed in the Commercial Zone
District of the Weld County Zoning Resolution adopted by the Weld County
Board of County Commissioners. Any changes of use on a lot which has been
approved in a final site plan review shall be subject to review again for
the new use.
2. Agricultural production will be permitted. If agricultural production is
not pursued on all or any protion of the Commercial Unit Development that
portion not in agricultural production shall be maintained in a manner
so as to prevent fugitive dust, erosion, growth of noxious weeds.
Nonornamental ground cover shall not exceed 12 inches in height.
3. Use of property shall comply with all County and State Health Standards
and Regulations pertaining to air quality, water quality, noise emission,
and disposal systems.
4. Maximum height of buildings shall be 40 feet. Minimum front setback shall
be 50 feet. Side and rear setbacks shall be in compliance with Weld County
requirements for commercial zoning.
5. Access to the property shall be limited to one from the private interior
road as shown hereon.
6. Lighting shall be of the mercury vapor type. Lighting plan, when developed
shall be submitted to the County, the State Highway Department, and all
affected power and utility companies for approval .
7. Signs shall be limited to one ( I ) for Lot 9. Signs shall conform with
State Highway recommendations regarding lighting size and be in compliance
with the requirements of the Weld County Zoning Resolution.
B. The recommendations of the Subsurface Rock Stability Report by Fox and
Associates, Inc. dated January 4, 1974, and addendum report dated January
22, 1974, shall be incorporated in the design and construction of any
structures placed or built on Lot 9. Information pertaining to "kip loadings"
of piers shall be submitted to the Director of the Building Inspection
Division prior to the issuance of any building permit for construction
within Lot 9.
9. All fire protection facilities, including hydrants, or water storage
tanks shall be located in accordance with the recommendations of the
Dacono Area Fire Protection District.
10. The site plan shall be limited to the plan submitted and governed by
the Development Standards stated above and applicable Weld County
regulations. Any material deviations from the plans and/or Development
Standards, as shown or stated above shall require the approval of an
amendment to the site plan by the Planning Commission and the Board
of County Commissioners before such changes from the plans and/or
Development Standards shall be permitted. Any other changes from
the plans and/or Development Standards shall be filed in the office
of the Department of Planning Services.
VT:rg
R & T CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
P . O. Box 831
Longmont , Colorado 80501
February 8 , 1981
Ms . Vickie Traxler
Assistant Zoning Inspector
Weld County Department of Planning Services
915 — 10th Street
Greeley , CO 80631
Re : Request for contracting shop on Lot 9, Althen-Boyer
Commercial Unit Development , a subdivision locating
in the SW1/4 , Section 23 , TIN, R68W of the 6th P.M. ,
Weld County , Colorado
Dear Ms . Traxler :
R & T Construction wishes to establish a mechanical contracting
office and shop on the above mentioned site .
We will be conducting the installation of plumbing and heating
systems in schools , bank buildings and other commercial and
industrial buildings . We also install process piping in water
treatment plants , sewage treatment plants and process food
systems in various types of food processing plants .
We plan to have no more than six people employed at our shop
and office location.
Truck traffic will consist mostly of just pickup trucks with
an occasional truck. and trailer. Ninety percent of our
materials are delivered straight from our supplier to the
jobsite .
We will store materials such as fittings , valves , copper pipe ,
tools and office supplies inside our shop . Outside there will
be steel pipe , cast iron water main, soil pipe along with our back-
hoe , tamper, field office trailer, and field office storage van.
This material and equipment will be moving back and forth from the
shop to the jobsite .
C
Weld County Department of Planning Services
February 8 , 1981
Page 2
We have looked over the development standards and we feel. we
can operate our shop within these standards .
If you need any further information regarding our intended
operation, please let us know .
Sincerely ,
Tern Wart,
Tom Foster
>er
.4,4‘;/.402/
Ron Vaught
RV:dv
r:' ggl0j7 .
n RE FEB 'gi -„,
Ct/V f
is
\GQ a nninw�co�� In DQ.
•
r DEVELOPMENT ,STANDARDS
1 . The permitted uses on the hereon described property within the
Commercial Unit Development shall be those uses as listed in the
Commercial Zone District of the Weld County Zoning Resolution adopted
by the Weld County Board of County Commissioners.
2 . Agricultural production will be permitted. If agricultural production
is not pursued on all .or any portion of the Commercial Unit
Development that portion not in agricultural production shall be
maintained in a manner so as . to prevent fugitive dust, erosion,
growth of noxious weeds, and non-ornamental ground cover shall not
exceed 12 inches in height.
•
3. Access to property to be limited to two (2) from Frontage Road
(County Road 9) and one (1) from County Road 6 as shown on the
drawings.
4. Maximum height of buildings shall be 40 feet.
5. Minimum front setback shall be 50 feet. Side and rear setbacks shall
be in compliance with Weld County Requirements for commercial zoning.
6. Lighting shall be of the mercury vapor type. Lighting plan, when
developed, shall be submitted to the County, the State Highway
Department, and all affected power and utility companies for approval.
7. No fencing shall be permitted along the right-of-way of the Bull
Canal as requested by the Farmers Reservoir and Irrigation Company.
Fencing permitted along lot lines shall be chain link.
- 8. All interior roads to be private, maintained at owners expense and
constructed to Weld County Standards.
9. Signs shall be limited to two (2) for overall site and one (1) per
individual site. Signs shall conform with State Highway recommendations
regarding lighting size and be in compliance with the requirements
of the Weld County Zoning Resolution.
10 . Acceptability of sewage systems. in the Commercial Unit Development
area shall be subject to the approval of the Weld County Health
Department.
11 . The recommendations of the Subsurface Rock Stability Report by Fox
and Associates, Inca dated- January 4 , 1974 and addendum report dated
January 22 , 1974 , shall be part of the Development Standards.
•
12 . It is intended to use the water storage area both as a reservoir
for fire protection and a storage area for drainage. A detailed
drainage plan shall be submitted to the County Engineer for approval
at the time the site plan is reviewed by Weld County.
13 . All fire protection facilities, including hydrants , shall be located
in accordance with the recommendations of the Dacono Area Fire
Protection District as defined by letters from such District dated
April 20, 1976 and April 7, 1974 and on file with the Weld County
Department of Planning Services. Compliance will be reviewed at the
time of the site plan review.
14 . Information pertaining to "kip loadings" of piers shall be submitted
to the Director of the Building Inspection Division prior to the
issuance of any building permit for construction with-in the
Commercial Unit Development area. X
15. A final site plan for each lot within the Commercial Unit
Development shall be reviewed by the Board of County Commissioners
for their approval . Any changes of use on a lot which has been
approved in a final site plan review shall be subject to review
again for the new use. The final site plan review shall include the
following:
a. Identification in detail of the proposed use;
b. The number, type, and frequency of traffic generated;
c. A drainage study for the lot;
d. The number of employees;
e. Indication of the location of the proposed access;
f. Indication of landscaping proposed;
g. Information on what provisions shall be made for fire
protection so it will be in compliance with #13 above.
h. Indication of the water requirements of the proposed use; and
i. Indication of the sewage requirements and details on the
proposed system.
This required information shall besubmitted in a combination of
written and map form utilizing the Weld County PUD guidelines.
The final site plan map shall be recorded in the Weld County
Clerk and Recorder ' s office.
•
•
•f. aX C 2- SSOC. . .-mt.
CONSULTING Elf 'JEERS & GEOLOGISTS
SOIL, FOUNDATION & GEOLOGICAL INVESTIGATIONS
4765 INDEPENDENCE ST. • WHEATRIDGE, COLORADO 80033 • TEL. (303) 024.5578
ADDENDUM TO REPORT
SUBSURFACE ROCK STABILITY
OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4
OF SEC 23, T1N, R68W, OF THE 6TH P.M.
• WELD COUNTY, COLORADO
• JANUARY 4, 1974
•
•
Prepared for:
Mr. Jack Boyer
•
Job No. 2141-01116
January 22, 1974
Fnu, ui Pon Sods Ins.••so„ _ ` - C✓'."0' • G'uL"tl P i rr C vL our^y'nt • Engineering Geology • Asphalt & Conrn`te . CeSJirs & i est..ng
Better definition has been received concerning the part of Section 23, T1N,
R68W, of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado, to be developed. The redefined area
is shown by the stippled pattern on Plate 2 (attached) , and the following remarks
pertain to only that part of the S/2 of the SW/4 of Section 23. -
The positions of the mine workings (entries , drifts, haulage ways, etc.)
shown on Plate 2 are approximate. They have been copied from the final survey map
of the Washington Mine. If we assume that the final survey map is a correct
representation of the actual workings , then the following remarks are believed
to be correct.
We believe that Lot Numbers 1 through 10 are safe for a light industrial type
• of development. This opinion is based on the fact that the coal pillars between
the workings are indicated to be intact by the records at the State Mine Inspector's
office. However, care must be exercised in designing and positioning foundations
for all structures to be constructed on Lot Numbers 1 , 2, 3, 4, 5, and 7. If by
the nature of the proposed structure or by the nature of the equipment or materials
to be contained therein, the loading will be in excess of 3000 psf for any part of
the structure, we recommend that the specific site be drilled and tested for rock
stability in accordance with the type and amount of loading anticipated.
By exercising this type of caution, we believe that no structures will ever be
subjected to structural damage caused by subsidence at the Washington Mine workings
shown in the stippled area on Plate 2. We further recommend that the general pre-
cautions stated in the original report be adhered to fcr all development work in
this redefined area.
F. M. FOX & ASSOCIATES, INC. cc:R e
4.114:-L4/ 0 icez) ; /ate
Harvey C. Olander, Frederick M. Fox,
Staff Geologist ( President
•
4�Ji
Copies: 3
BAF:pw '% 'en;
'aaaasz�
X
•
'27 Dac !mo Area Fire Pro ection District
kill
March 11, 1981
Mr. Bud Althen
5720 South Pearl Street
Littleton, Colorado 80120 •
Sir;
Regarding our conversation on the possible use of the lake
on your property for stored water to meet the needs of the
developement proposed on lot 9, the Foster-Vaught developement,
I submit the following.
First of all I stated that we would need a guarantee that the ,
•
lake will at all points in time contain the minimum requirement
of 25,000 gallons of water. If such requirements were to fail •
we would then need an on sight storage tank or other arrangements.
I was on the sight today and looked over the possibility of the
line to the dry hydrant as I explained it to you. First of all
the elevation of the water as compared to the elevation of the '
proposed developement sight is going to have the water pipe at
least 20 to 25 feet in the ground at the sight, plus a riser to
the fire department connection. We only safely plan on lifting
the water a maximum of 20 feet when needed with a pumper. I see
the lift as too high.
Also the depth of the lake is not nearly as deep as I was to
believe and the request that I made that the end strainer on the
dry hydrant be at least 24 inches below the top water level at
it's lowest point and at least 24 inches from the bottom of the
lake will be nearly impossible to meet with the present water
level.
Another problem I see is the amount of moss and silt in the lake
and this coupled to the shallow depth of the water the suction
intake on the line will plug before any apreciable amount of
water can be obtained for fire fighting in the case of need.
The roadway of course will have to be given a sufficient base
to asure it' s being capable of year around usage, which we have
agreed upon.
\\N2v3141516 ,
p,. Mq
f? a 1g v
• ,. 61.^e, 4-4)
4404 Au
;tiff y
DACONO, COLORADO 80514 FneF'a7 `yy
r ,-�
conts
As I stated to you, the storage of water in the lake would be
acceptable if the minimum amount required was maintained and
I also questioned the possibility of replenishment of the supply
if the water proposals with Northglenn and the Farmers material-
izes.
If you can maintain the water required in the lake at all times
and can run the line to the point of the fire department connec-
tion as stated and have the water flow to the bottom of the riser
in the attached drawing of a dry hydrant connection, by gravity
flow, and NOT have the lift at the connection to beF�4nore than
a maximum of 20 feet, and have sufficient depth of the water at
the point of intake as explained and shown on the drawing, and
be in clear enough water to prevent the clogging of the suction
strainer while being pumped out, I will accept the lake as a
sufficient method of storage and the dry hydrant will work for
the proposal.
As I stated I want the owners of the property and yourself to
be informed as to the problems that can occur if the water supply yz
was to fail in the future, such as we would then demand that an
additional supply be installed to allow the occupancy to continue
as I told you at our meeting.
After my tour of the sight, I sincerely doubt the feasibility of
the lake being used, But if the lot elevations were changed
or a survey could show that the elevation of the water in
comparison to the fire department connection were to be satis-
factory, I could live with the proposal. If this is not possible
we will want other means of on sight storage.
47
Joseph W. Fuss
t441'Fire Chieffc
Dacono Fire Prot. Dist.
Dacono, Colorado
cc/ Weld Planning
Board of Directors
IS
y t;
-)
I -4 a [
•
I a
-i `4 L 2
7 -`4 J 1
a
-c .'+ —
/
C--
i % ,:,d 1
of
•
.
....1
L1
ThI I
Y J
t1 .,-
....,
I ) 1
1 J
`4 I
,
I
'fro j
I 1
I 1
i
'J 1 ', ,
I
,
I
G
m_
i I M Y
n V il t 1
Y
1 Z V 1 e I - t� •L
4. \ T
J
_a-
-4
2 ..
.L - -1.- i
F]
n
I i
4
CO n w
p
i
a 1 el u
i ^ y \
v U . I
1 \' N l
7
II
h •
i Z n:
3 b 5 : 1
st - V1
2
� e- C.... , Q N• 0
1 ,
' ,1 February 13, 1981
I ; �C) CASE N .LR •
COLORADO
REFERRAL
TO WHOM IT ..AY Co::CERN :
Enclosed is an application from Tom Foster and Ron Vaught
for a Site Plan
The parcel of land is described as Lot 9, Althen-Boyer C.U.D.
SW4, Section 23, T1N, R68W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado
The location of the parcel of land for which this application has been
submitted is 2 miles west and 3 miles south of Dacono adjacent to I-25
•
• This application is submitted to your office for review and recommenda-
tions. Any corments or recormendations you consider relevant to this
request would be appreciated. Your prompt reply will help to facili-
tate the processing of the proposal and will ensure prompt considera-
tion of your recouwiendations. If a response from your office is not
received within 14 days of mailing from our office, it may be in-
terpreted to mean approval by your office. If you are unable to
respond within 14 days (but wish to do so at a later date) please
notify our office to that effect.
Check the appropriate boxes below and return to our address listed
above. Please reply by March 2. 19gi so that we may give
full consideration to your recouunendation. Thank you very much for
your help and cooperation in this matter.
1 . K We have reviewed the proposal and find no conflicts with our
interests. w 1( ,Need , Gccep{-alote sewer SYSi-w•�
2. A formal recommendation is under consideration and will be
submitted to you prior to
3 . Please refer to the enclosed letter.
Signed114, Agency (jJ C. ( �.,. '���l�i
~'t
�'.\Assi
stant tant Zoning Administrator
VT:rg
—- 2-h CV v..7lar.� r% N
•
• u f 77\ <:
rJ Y PE
'f' ".
- ` FIR 1 Q10Q1 February 13, 1981
`I � ' . ' ViaO r0UNTY CA N-"
L. ..1.1 1. : Li _J ; Engineering Department
COLORADO
RE_ERR r.L
TO 1 H0`_, IT MAY CONCERN :
Enclosed is an application from Tom Foster and Ron Vaught
,
for a Site Plan
The parcel of land is described as Lot 9, Althen-Boyer C.U.D.
SW1, Section 23, TIN, R68W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado .
The location of the parcel of land for which this application has been
submitted is 2 miles west and 3 miles south of Dacono adjacent to I-25
• This application is submitted to your office for review and recoucnenda-
tions . Any couwients or recommendations you consider relevant to this
request would be appreciated. Your prompt reply will help to facili-
tate the processing of the proposal and will ensure prompt considera-
tion of your recommendations. If a response from your office is not
received within 14 days of mailing from our office, it may be in-
terpreted to mean approval by your office. If you are unable to
respond within 14 days (but wish to do so at a later date) please
notify our office to that effect.
Check the appropriate boxes below and return to our address listed
above. Please reply by March 2. 1981 so that we may give
full consideration to your recommendation. Thank you very much for
your help and cooperation in this matter. .1/4\, '
1. / We have reviewed the proposal and find no conflicts '
interests. C
2. A formal recommendation is under consideration atr3i Mittpe�O .s ;
submitted to you prior to C ..,4 • :J/
3 , Please refer to the enclosed letter. 4e , yCO0'
�\Signed Agency n7; cam ,-:may Date -r1 s/
\iici.c.sc. \Covr-
Assistant Zoning Administrator
4
?AF ENT OF PLA'JN'N ,
P''-LONE 1303125E 12D EX
c:ES.' ET=_
- r r - -1 �_ GREEELEY•COL:=cy_ n:.:
l ; 1 ! ' } '1 February 13, 1981
1
CASE NUMBERLi �._i Li - .
COLORADO
REFERRAL
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
Enclosed is an application from Tom Foster and Ron Vaught
for a Site Plan
The parcel of land is described as Lot 9, Althen-Boyer C.U.A.
SW' , Section 23, T1N, R68W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado
The location of the parcel of land for which this application has been
submitted is 2 miles west and 3 miles south of Dacono adjacent to I-25
• This application is submitted to your office for review and recommenda-
tions . Any comments or recommendations you consider relevant to this
request would be appreciated. Your prompt reply will help to facili-
tate the processing of the proposal and will ensure prompt considera-
tion of your recommendations. If a response from your office is not
received within 14 days of mailing from our office, it may be in-
terpreted to mean approval by your office. If you are unable to
respond within 14 days (but wish to do so at a later date) please
notify our office to that effect.
Check the appropriate boxes below and return to our address listed
above. Please reply by March 2. 1981 so that we may give
full consideration to your recommendation. Thank you very much for
your help and cooperation in this matter.
1. We have reviewed the proposal and find no conflicts with our
interests.
2. A formal recommendation is under consideration and will be
submitted to you prior to
3 . Please refer to the enclosed letter. ,� 7.71%G ;
i Signed C A enc a % / L >
g lC1 g y -4;,; �i, ta,L i to ` l-V
k , r�� 9 i•= RECEIVED of
C'
V •`y Weld Comity
V t:elu-' C �, -nlsslaa ih,
cii
Assistant Zoning Administrator !1 cY
VT:rg J c. '
7/11/R1
•
•
Dacono Area Fire Protection District
�- ' February 21, 1981
r
Department of Planning Services
915 10th Street
Greeley, Colorado 80631
Attn: Vickie Traxler
Asst. Zoning Administrator
Vickie Traxler;
Regarding the application for the site plan proposal of Foster
and Vaught, Lot 9, Althen-Boyer C.U.D. in Weld County at approx-
imately WCR 6 and I-25 frontage road.
As you know from our previous letters of April 20, 1976 and April
7, 1974, that we felt the need for water mains and hydrants or
sufficient on site storage of water. supply for fire fighting.
We also agreed to let the three existing buildings be construct-
ed and attempt to use the lake or reservoir on the property for
on site storage. There was to be a dry hydrant and line into the
water in the lake and a road to the area for us to use for fire
trucks to draft the water and relay.
As of this date the water supply is not sufficient and does not
maintain a level at which we could reach it for fire fighting if
needed. The Road has been worked on and is only partially accept-
able.
We feel that the on site water supply is not now adequate or has
not ever been, due to the shallow depth of the water at the point
where we need it . Also the distance from the lake to the lot in
question is excessive and we feel we need to have water in lines
or satisfactory storage tanks for fire protection of this area.
We have in the past week had a fire in the area where we had to
call on tankers from the mutual aid stations at Longmont Rural,
Brownsville, and Erie to haul water for fire suppression. This
is nice to have this assistance, but it is not fair for them to
have to transport water for an area that should have it' s own
and on top of that we are pulling the fire protection equipment
out of the areas mentioned to protect an area that they are not
responsible for.
cont;
DACONO, COLORADO 80514
•
Lot 9 Althen Boyer cont;
Also I cannot justify the need to add taxes to support our district
in the purchase of additional water tankers just to be able to
protect a small area of the entire district, and this is what we
would have to do if we continue to let rural areas expand without
water or water lines on site.
Using the plan sent me, I see an office area of 1200 square feet,
and a warehouse area of 5000 square feet, for a total of 6200 square
feet of building. I do not have anticipated heights of the two
parts of the structure, but estimated 12 feet for the office and
20 feet for the warehouse. This gives me an anticipated 114,400
cubic feet of building, plus vehicles and possible fuel supplies
on site.
Assuming the buildings will house only the types of supplies given
in the application, we will need not less than 22,600 gallons of
on site water storage for the fire fighting in the buildings and
somewhat more for the vehicles and fuel storage etc. The total
need of 25,000 gallons of on site storage is not excessive as we
see the plan at this time.
As I have stated in the previous letters, I prefer to have the
area install fire hydrants located on not less than 6" mains and
this will become a needed requirement as this area grows and it
is showing that it will.
Also the uniform fire code adopted by the Board of Directors of the
Dacono Fire Protection Sistrict requires; Section 13,313 (e)
Fire Hydrants and hard surfaced roads shall be installed before
construction is begun above ground level, or before combustible
materials are stockpiled . Fire Hydrant shall be tested and
charged ready for fire department use and access roads shall
include all streets, public parking lots or other vehicular
areas shown on the final developement plan, including street signs.
It is for the above reasons that I request the following plans
be considered for this area;
1 . That the 6" water mains be installed and a fire hydrant located
not more than 600 feet from the buildings in question, said
hydrant charged and tested prior to construction, or
2. That an on site storage tank, capable of not less than 25,000
gallons of water be constructed and filled prior to occupancy
of the buildings.
I firmly believe that the recent events at the shopping venter in
Parker, Colorado should bear out my requests.
I should also like to be notified as to the dates of the hearings
on this site so that myself or a representative could attend if
possible.
Re ectfully
llv
osegn W. Fuss
Fire Chief
Dacono Area Fire Prot. Dist.
J
r-., RECORDING DATA - MAPS & PIAc3
Lot 9 - Althen-Boyer Commercial Unit Development
NAME OF SUBDIVISION — —
Ron Vaught - Thomas R Foster
NAME OF SUBDIVIDER __.._- �-•
A subdivision located in the SW1, Sec 23, T 1 N. , R. 68 W. 6th P.M.
I.OfAT10N OF SUBDIVISION Weld County, Colorado _
DATE OF RECORDING, MAR i_1_i981 BOOK 932 RECEPTION # 185378g
MARY ANN FEUERSTEIN
HELD COUNTY
AND RECORDER
BY: G�/
DEPUTY COUNTY CLERK & RECORDER
File contains
oversized map
Please see original file
Hello