HomeMy WebLinkAbout20081157.tiff 282
RESOLUTION
RE: AMEND SETTING OF HEARING DATE, SETTING OF BRIEFING SCHEDULE, AND
ESTABLISHMENT OF CRITERIA FOR APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION DENIAL
OF USE BY SPECIAL REVIEW#1629 FOR A MAJOR FACILITY OF A PUBLIC UTILITY
OR PUBLIC AGENCY - A. DALE SLATER TRUST B / UNITED POWER, INC.
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, pursuant to
Colorado statute and the Weld County Home Rule Charter, is vested with the authority of
administering the affairs of Weld County, Colorado, and
WHEREAS,on January 15, 2008,in accordance with Chapter 23 of the Weld County Code,
the Weld County Planning Commission voted to deny the application of A. Dale Slater Trust B,
Attn: Nancy Slater, 13433 County Road 7, Longmont, Colorado 80504/ United Power, Inc., 500
Cooperative Way, P.O. Box 929, Brighton, Colorado 80603, for a Site Specific Development Plan
and Use by Special Review Permit#1629 for a Major Facility of a Public Utility or Public Agency
(electrical substation), subject to the provisions of Section 23-4-420, in the A (Agricultural) Zone
District, and
WHEREAS, on March 14, 2008, United Power submitted an appeal of the Planning
Commission's findings, pursuant to Section 2-4-10 of the Weld County Code, and
WHEREAS, by and through Resolution #2008-0914, the Board set a public hearing on
April 23, 2008, at 9:00 a.m., for the purpose of taking oral argument and considering said appeal,
with an accompanying briefing schedule, and
WHEREAS, the completion of the transcription of proceedings before the Planning
Commission on January 15, 2008, has been delayed and,as a result,the hearing date and briefing
schedule set in Resolution #2008-0914 must be modified, and
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners now deems it advisable to amend its
hearing setting and briefing schedule, and to establish the criteria for the appeal so as to assist the
parties in their briefing and preparation for said hearing.
C a NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Weld
g County, Colorado, that a public hearing to take oral argument and to consider the appeal of the
cam Planning Commission's denial of a Site Specific Development Plan and Use by Special Review
as Permit#1629 for a Major Facility of a Public Utility or Public Agency(electrical substation), subject
to the provisions of Section 23-4-420, in the A(Agricultural)Zone District,for A. Dale Slater Trust B
o / United Power, Inc., be, and hereby is, scheduled for May 14, 2008, at 9:00 a.m., and that the
imm
9 ` hearing originally set for April 23, 2008, be, and hereby is, vacated.
E
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Board that the Clerk to the Board be, and hereby is,
.M N ordered to obtain a transcript of the proceedings before the Planning Commission on January 15,
=__-- - 2008, and to include it in a complete record of the case being certified by the Clerk no later than
o April 25, 2008.
=coo
-0
N BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Board that the Clerk to the Board be, and hereby is,
;2 o ordered to send a copy of the complete certified record of the case to persons who request a copy
=o of the same and to the Board for its review.
cc
�wr—m -
0 2008-1157
=M� „ ( �L, PLOO hiL PL1963
US -cP-o- O
RE: AMEND SETTING OF HEARING DATE, SETTING OF BRIEFING SCHEDULE, AND
ESTABLISHMENT OF CRITERIA FOR APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION DENIAL OF
USR#1629 - A. DALE SLATER TRUST B / UNITED POWER, INC.
PAGE 2
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Board that the Clerk to the Board be, and hereby is,
ordered to send notice of said May 14, 2008, hearing to those persons who previously received
notice of the January 15, 2008, Planning Commission hearing.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Board that United Power, Inc., shall have to,and until,
April 30, 2008, in which to file its brief in the appeal; any persons wishing to respond, in writing, to
the United Power, Inc., brief shall then have to, and until, May 6, 2008, to file such response; and
United Power, Inc., shall then have to, and until, May 9, 2008, in which to file a reply to any
responses thus filed.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Board that the criteria for the Board to determine
whether or not it should grant the appeal shall be whether the Planning Commission exceeded its
jurisdiction or abused its discretion in denying the Site Specific Development Plan and Use by
Special Review Permit #1629 for a Major Facility of a Public Utility or Public Agency (electrical
substation), subject to the provisions of Section 23-4-420, in the A(Agricultural)Zone District, for
A. Dale Slater Trust B / United Power, Inc.
The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by
the following vote on the 21st day of April, A.D., 2008.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
a WELD COUNTY, COLORADO
ATTEST: U1 War �/ ' et, =XCUSED
y 185: <,,: o�, Iliam H. Jerke, Chair
Weld Count Clerk to the =oa w `.j`. ` < \ \�
i ' \` f a Robect . Masden, Pro-Tem
BY. l � 1tab" • e . r' � .
Dep y Clerlc to�the Board j �
Will F. Garcia
APPROVED AS TO FORM: .V__) ck,l\ EI� /
n David E. Long
( .0 Attor A VJ r 1�_ (�
A.,5,_ Coin Attomsyi r
Dougla4 Rademach
Date of signature: 3k/ft
1 VIII HIII HID IIIII III 1111111111111 III HIIHMI
3554282 05/15/2008 01:39P Weld County, CO 2008-1157
2 of 7 R 0.00 D 0.00 Steve Moreno Clerk & Recorder PL1963
•
1
Bruce Barker
From: Mark Meyer[mmeyer@rothgerber.com]
Sent: Friday, April 18, 2008 10:38 AM
To: Bruce Barker; David Foster
Cc: Esther Gesick; Michelle Martin; Jason Maxey
Subject: RE: Appeal Timeline
Attachments: United Power Appeal Reso 42108 v2 RJL(00552232).DOC; REDLINE. United Power Appeal
Reso 42108 v2 RJL(00552231).DOC
L�
United Power REDLINE. United
tppeal Reso 42108.. Power Appeal R...
Bruce and David:
Attached please find our comments to the draft Resolution, both in
clean and redlined formats. In the initial draft, the final resolution
inserted a standard of review that would be applicable in an appeal with
a court, for example, under a 106 matter. Here, Section 2-4-10.D. makes
it clear that the BOCC "shall hear all the available facts pertinent to
the incident . . . and shall render a determination . . . . " As such,
please make the revisions we propose so that we are not adding a
standard which does not apply to this hearing.
Thank you.
Mark A. Meyer, Esq.
Rothgerber Johnson & Lyons LLP
1200 17th Street, Suite 3000
Denver, Colorado 80202
Phone: (303) 623-9000
Facsimile: (303) 623-9222
E-mail: "mmeyer@rothgerber.com"
****************************************************************************
NOTICE: This electronic mail transmission may constitute an
attorney-client communication that is privileged at law. It is not
intended for transmission to, or receipt by, any unauthorized persons.
If you have received this electronic mail transmission in error,
please
delete it from your system without copying it, and notify the sender
by
e-mail, so that our address record can be corrected.
*******************************+********************************************
>>> "Bruce Barker" cbbarker@co.weld.co.us> 4/17/2008 4:27 PM >>>
Mark and David:
Please review the attached. Let me know if you see the need for any
changes.
Esther and Michelle: Please let us know if you see the need for any
changes.
Thanks. EXHIBIT
Bruce Barker.
4/21/2008 8:13 AM 111111111111111I 11111 III 1111111 MIII III 11111 IIII 1111 VII' ca
3554282 05/15/2008 01:39P Weld County, CO
3 of 7 R 0.00 0 0.00 Steve Moreno Clerk & Recorder
15, 2008,and to include it in a complete record of the case being certified by the Clerk no later
than April 25, 2008.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Board that the Clerk to the Board be,and hereby
is,ordered to send a copy of the complete certified record of the case to persons who request a
copy of the same and to the Board for its review.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Board that the Clerk to the Board be, and hereby
is,ordered to send notice of said May 14, 2008,hearing to those persons who previously
received notice of the January 15,2008, Planning Commission hearing.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Board that United Power shall have to and until to
April 30, 2008, in which to file its brief in the appeal; any persons wish to respond in writing to
the United Power brief shall then have to and until May 6,2008,to file such response; and
I United Power shall then have to and until May 9, 2008, in which to file a reply to any responses
thus filed.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Board that the criteria for the Board to determine
whether or not it should grant the appeal shall be whether United Power has met its burden of
proof under Section 23-4-420 and the applicable standards set forth in Section 23-2-400 with
respect tgthe Site Specific Development Plan and Use by Special Review Permit#1629 for a -- Deleted:the Planning Commission
Major Facility of a Public Utility or Public Agency(electrical substation), subject to the provisions exceeded itsjunsdiction or abused its
discretion in denying
of Section 23-4-420, in the A(Agricultural)Zone District,for A. Dale Slater Trust B/United
Power.
The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made and seconded, adopted
by the following vote on the 2151 day of April,A.D.,2008.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
WELD COUNTY, COLORADO
ATTEST:
William H. Jerke,Chair
Weld County Clerk to the Board
Robert D. Masden, Pro-Tem
BY:
Deputy Clerk to the Board
William F. Garcia
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
David E. Long
County Attorney
Douglas Rademacher
2008-"
PL1963
11111 11111 111111H III 1111111111111 III IIIII IIII IIII
3554282 05/15/2008 01:39P Weld County, CO
4 of 7 R 0.00 D 0.00 Steve Moreno Clerk & Recorder
Sec.2-4-10.Appeals process.
The Board of County Commissioners shall act as a board of appeals to hear complaints on actions
taken by County boards, commissions and departments. Except for decisions made by the Board
of Adjustment and Uniform Building Code Board of Appeals, procedure for appeals shall be as
set forth in this Chapter,by resolution of the Board, or as otherwise provided by law.
A. Any person appealing an action by a County board, commission or department to the
Board of County Commissioners shall file such a complaint, in writing, with the Clerk to the
Board within sixty(60) days of the incident in question.
B. Such complaint shall include:
1. The name of the employee, board, commission or department against which
the complaint is made.
2. A description of the basic facts involved in the complaint.
C. The Clerk to the Board shall schedule a hearing with the Board of County
Commissioners, to be held within fifteen(15) days of the filing of the complaint, and shall notify
all parties involved in the incident.
D. The Board of County Commissioners shall hear all the available facts pertinent to the
incident, may schedule a second hearing within thirty(30) days following the initial hearing if the
Board determines such a need, and shall render a determination within thirty(30)days of the final
hearing.
E.No person shall be denied the right to appeal,provided that he or she complies with
the administrative procedures established by the Board.
1111111 11111 111111 11111 III 1111111 111111 111 11111 1111 1111
3554282 05/15/2008 01:39P Weld County, CO
5 of 7 R 0.00 0 0.00 Steve Moreno Clerk & Recorder
CHAPTER 3
Human Resources
Sec.3-4-70.Grievance hearing.
I. Review of appeal.
1. The Director of Human Resources shall transmit the Grievance Board's decision, the
notice of appeal and any memorandum brief to the Board of County Commissioners for review.
2. The Board of County Commissioners may affirm the Grievance Board's decision,
modify it in whole or in part, or remand the matter to the Grievance Board for further fact-
finding. A modification may only be made if, based upon the Grievance Board's findings of fact,
the decision is clearly wrong or is in excess of the Grievance Board's jurisdiction, authority,
purposes or limitations as defined by this Chapter and the procedures outlined in Chapter 2 of this
Code. The Board of County Commissioners may review the entire hearing record upon a majority
vote of the Board of County Commissioners.
CHAPTER 20
Road Impact Fees
Sec. 20-1-330. Standards.
If, on the basis of generally recognized principles of impact analysis, it is determined that
the data, information and assumptions used by the applicant to calculate that the Independent Fee
Calculation Study satisfy the requirements of this Section, the fee determined in the Independent
Fee Calculation Study shall be deemed the fee due and owing for the proposed traffic-generating
development. The adjustment shall be set forth in a Fee Agreement. If the Independent Fee
Calculation Study fails to satisfy the requirements of this Section, the fee applied shall be that fee
established for the traffic-generating development in Section 20-1-220 above.
Sec. 20-1-340. Appeal of decision.
A. A fee payer affected by the administrative decision of the Director on an Independent
Fee Calculation Study may appeal such decision to the Board of County Commissioners, by filing
with the Director within ten (10) days of the date of the written decision a written notice stating
and specifying briefly the grounds of the appeal.
B. The Board of County Commissioners, after hearing, shall have the power to affirm or
reverse the decision of the Director. In making its decision,the Board of County Commissioners
shall make written findings of fact and conclusions of law, and apply the standards in Section 20-
1-330 above. If the Board of County Commissioners reverses the decision of the Director, it shall
instruct the Director to recalculate the fee in accordance with its findings. In no case shall the
Board of County Commissioners
I IIIIII IIIII IIIIII IIIII III 1111111 IIIIII III IIIII IIII IIII
3554282 05/15/2008 01:39P Weld County, CO
6 of 7 R 0.00 D 0.00 Steve Moreno Clerk & Recorder
Jennifer VanEgdom
From: Bruce Barker
Sent: Monday, April 21, 2008 9:25 AM
To: Bill Jerke; Rob Masden; Dave Long; Douglas Rademacher; William Garcia
Cc: Michelle Martin; Esther Gesick; Jennifer VanEgdom
Subject: FW: Resolution Redline- United Power Special Use
Attachments: FGMMC email logo 2.jpg
This came in on Friday and went into"Junkmail." Pertinent to discussion of Planning Item 2 on the agenda for April 21,
2008.
Original Message
From: Cynthia M. Treadwell [mailto:ctm@fostergraham.comj
Sent: Friday, April 18, 2008 11:55 AM
To: mmeyer@rothegerber.com; Bruce Barker
Cc: David Foster
Subject: Resolution Redline - United Power Special Use
Gentlemen:
Our client will not consent to the redline changes proposed. Respectfully, there are already several significant jurisdictional
issues and this proposed language substantially alters the scope of the review and does not reflect any of the intent or
discussion to date.
FGMMC email logo
2.jpg (10 KB)...
We believe that for clarification purposes an ad itional sentence needs to be added to the end of that
paragraph as follows: "This appeal shall be conducted in accordance with the standards of C.R.C.P. 106(a)(4)."
Cynthia M. Treadwell
Foster Graham Milstein Miller& Calisher LLP
621 Seventeenth St., 19th Floor
Denver, CO 80293
(303)333-9810
(303)333-9786 (fax)
www.fostergraham.com <blocked::http://www.fostergraham.com/>
PLEASE NOTE: This email message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and
may contain information that is privileged, confidential, and/or exempt from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient,
you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you
have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately. FEDERAL TAX ADVICE DISCLAIMER: We are
required by U.S. Treasury Regulations to inform you that, to the extent this message includes any federal tax advice, this
message is not intended or written by the sender to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of avoiding federal tax
penalties.
HBO 11111 11111111111 III 1111111 IIIIII III 11111 IIII IIII 1
3554282 05/15/2008 01:39P Weld County, CO
7 of 7 R 0.00 0 0.00 Steve Moreno Clerk & Recorder
Hello