The URL can be used to link to this page

Browse Search

Home My WebLink About20081300.tiff • („vii Weld Counter Refprr eld County an r °partment WeldieountRimAILDING -,ant IS01 r 2CO2 IUNC January 4, 2008 JAN 1 : , RE's .IVE 0 COLORADO The Weld County Department of Planning Services has received the following item for review: Applicant Martin &Johanna Bangma 1989 Case Number AMUSR-686 Trust& Rocky Mountain Fuel Company, represented by Mile High Dairy LLC, do Dusty McCormick/AGPROfessionals LLC Please Reply By February 1, 2008 Planner Jacqueline Hatch Project Site Specific Development Plan and Special Review Permit for a Livestock Confinement Operation (1,940 head dairy including milking cows, dry cows, heifers, and calves)and one single family dwelling unit per lot other than those permitted under Section 23-3-20.A of the Weld County Code(two single family employee homes) in the A(Agricultural)Zone District. Legal A parcel being part of the E2 and Lot B of RE-525, also being part of the E2 of Section 17, • T3N, R68W of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado. Location West of and adjacent to CR 5 and north of and adjacent to CR 32. Parcel Number 1207 17 000014 & 1207 17 000027 The application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Please reply by the above listed date so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Any response not received before or on this date may be deemed to be a positive response to the Department of Planning Services. If you have any further questions regarding the application, please call the Planner associated with the request. Please note that new information may be added to applications under review during the review process. If you desire to examine or obtain this additional information, please call the Department of Planning Services. Weld County Planning Commission Hearing (if applicable) March 18, 2008 ❑ We have reviewed the request and find that it does/does not comply with our Comprehensive Plan ❑ We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests. )KSee attached letter. U Please notify me of any public hearings regarding this request. Comments: • F. Signature Date 4/�� gl Agency Map SON W6-1-(4 9177, W +Weld County Planning Dept. +4209 CR 24.5.Longmont,CO.80504 +(720)6524210 ext 8730 +(720)6: 2008-1300 SI190M LITTLE THOMPSON WATER DISTRICT Directors: District Manager: Alex Sauer,President Richard H.H.Whittet Jim Cooper • Kathy Gallivan-Crist January 14, 2008 835 E.Highway 56 Mac Juneau Berthoud,CO 80513 Dave Lorenz Richard Macomber Weld Co!1^ty PI97mng Department $�!iT!': BUILDING F 970.532.2096 Gary Olson .�IfVV CJi ! 970.532-3734 www.LTWD.orp JAN 1 2002 Jacqueline Hatch Weld County Planning Dept. 4209 CR 24.5 Longmont, CO 80504 Dear Jacqueline: This letter is in response to your request for comments on the proposed special review permit for Mile High Dairy(AMUSR-686). Little Thompson Water District currently serves this property through a 2" tap (# 3211). We will continue to serve this property subject to the rules and regulations of the District. We do have a couple of items that need to be considered as this special review permit is reviewed: • The Diary should evaluate the size of the existing water service to determine if it will be adequate to provide the volume and pressure needed to serve the increased needs of the proposed use. A larger or additional tap may be needed to meet the needs of the larger dairy. A larger tap or multiple taps could require upgrades to the water system in the area to mitigate the impacts of the additional demand on the system. The District rules require each residence to have an individual water tap. Existing customers with multiple residences are required to meet this requirement whenever the tap is transferred. The District can also allow multiple residences on a single tap, if the County has allowed the accessory dwelling, and the customer obtains an accessory dwelling permit from the District. If you have questions,please contact me. Regards, Michael T. Cook District Engineer • - C7 -, trge‘c..%) • Weld County Referral IJanuary 4, 2008 C. COLORADO The Weld County Department of Planning Services has received the following item for review: Applicant Martin &Johanna Bangma 1989 Case Number AMUSR-686 Trust& Rocky Mountain Fuel Company, represented by Mile High Dairy LLC, do Dusty McCormick/AGPROfessionals LLC Please Reply By February 1, 2008 Planner Jacqueline Hatch Project Site Specific Development Plan and Special Review Permit for a Livestock Confinement Operation (1,940 head dairy including milking cows, dry cows, heifers, and calves) and one single family dwelling unit per lot other than those permitted under Section 23-3-20.A of the Weld County Code (two single family employee homes) in the A(Agricultural)Zone District. Legal A parcel being part of the E2 and Lot B of RE-525, also being part of the E2 of Section 17, • T3N, R68W of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado. Location West of and adjacent to CR 5 and north of and adjacent to CR 32. Parcel Number 1207 17 000014 & 1207 17 000027 The application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Please reply by the above listed date so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Any response not received before or on this date may be deemed to be a positive response to the Department of Planning Services. If you have any further questions regarding the application, please call the Planner associated with the request. Please note that new information may be added to applications under review during the review process. If you desire to examine or obtain this additional information, please call the Department of Planning Services. Weld County Planning Commission Hearing (if applicable) March 18, 2008 ❑ We have reviewed the request and find that it does/does not comply with our Comprehensive Plan ❑ We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests. al See attached letter. ❑ Please notify me of any public hearings regarding this request. Comments: • SignatureDate 1It-1 l p8 Agency ry\,{ ,V,;p� Sire\� �•1 r c +Weld County Planning Dept. :4209 CR 24.5,Longmont,CO.50504 •:(720)6524210 ex1.8730 +(720)6524211 fax • °uNrq'" MOUNTAIN VIEW FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Administrative Office: 9119 County Line Road •Longmont, CO 80501 • E • 1 e (303) 772-0710 •FAX (303) 651-7702 Vies January 17, 2008 Ms. Jacqueline Hatch Weld County Planning Department 4209 Weld County Road 24.5 Longmont, CO 80504 Dear Ms. Hatch: I have reviewed the submitted material pertaining to Site Specific Development Plan and Special Review Permit for a Livestock Confinement Operation at 15333 Weld County Road 5 in Weld County (Care Name: Bangma, Cate Number: AMUSR-686). The property named is within the boundaries of the Mountain View Fire Protection District and receives service from the District. • • All construction shall be in accordance with the provisions of the 2006 International Fire Code. • Water supply for fire protection may be required for a new dwelling (the employee housing). Water supply for fife protection is not required for a single-family residence that is not larger than 3,600 gross square feet. If a residence exceeds 3,600 gross square feet, water supply for fife protection requirements apply. • If water supply for fire protection is not available from fire hydrants, the installation of a residential fire sprinkler system is accepted as an alternative to meeting the required fire flow for residential structures. • Water supply for fire protection is not required for, barns, corrals, storage buildings and accessory buildings provided the buildings is not being used as living space and hazardous activity will not be occurring within the structure. The milking parlor will need to be constructed of non-combustible construction. • Fire access roads shall be provided for all structures in excess of 150 feet from a public access road. Access roads shall consist of an all-weather surface capable to withstand the imposed loads of fire apparatus (75,000 pounds). • Station 1 Station 2 Station 3 Station 4 Station 5 Station 6 Station 7 9119 Cnty Line Rd. 14308 Mead St.,Unit B P.O.Box 575 P.O.Box 11 10911 Dobbin Run 50 Bonanza Dr. P.O.Box 40 Longmont,CO Longmont,CO 299 Palmer Ave. 8500 Niwot Road Lafayette,CO Erie,CO 100 So.Forest St. 80501 80504 Mead,CO 80542 Niwot,CO 80544 80026 80516 Dacono,CO 80514 Ms. Jacqueline Hatch • January 17, 2007 Page Two • If not already provided, approved address numbers shall be placed the property or on a freestanding sign in such a position to be plainly visible and legible from the street fronting the property. Address numbers or letters shall contrast with their background. We appreciate being involved in the planning process. Should you have any questions, please contact me at (303) 772-0710. Sincerely, LuAnn Penfold Fire Marshal LMP/lp cc: project file • Ip01.14.08 • ,_D a • Weld County Referral IWeld C County Planning Department GREELEY OFFICE January 4, 2008 JAN l a0o8 COLORADO RECEIVED The Weld County Department of Planning Services has received the following item for review: Applicant Martin &Johanna Bangma 1989 Case Number AMUSR-686 Trust& Rocky Mountain Fuel Company, represented by Mile High Dairy LLC, do Dusty McCormick/AGPROfessionals LLC Please Reply By February 1, 2008 Planner Jacqueline Hatch Project Site Specific Development Plan and Special Review Permit for a Livestock Confinement Operation (1,940 head dairy including milking cows, dry cows, heifers, and calves)and one single family dwelling unit per lot other than those permitted under Section 23-3-20.A of the Weld County Code(two single family employee homes)in the A(Agricultural)Zone District. Legal A parcel being part of the E2 and Lot B of RE-525, also being part of the E2 of Section 17, T3N, R68W of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado. • Location West of and adjacent to CR 5 and north of and adjacent to CR 32. Parcel Number 1207 17 000014 & 1207 17 000027 The application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Please reply by the above listed date so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Any response not received before or on this date may be deemed to be a positive response to the Department of Planning Services. If you have any further questions regarding the application, please call the Planner associated with the request. Please note that new information may be added to applications under review during the review process. If you desire to examine or obtain this additional information, please call the Department of Planning Services. Weld County Planning Commission Hearing (if applicable) March 18, 2008 ❑ We have reviewed the request and find that it does/does not comply with our Comprehensive Plan ❑ We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests. •_ ' See attached letter. ❑Please notify me of any public hearings regarding this request. Comments: �, C UT-PcoZ�fZTDLL ' .'•i2e --64 "GI�f7AA � r P' 4449 124(ak19 r VA ( PQopo5eo 1-6-1‘-47506-C6-7 i- &M M.&Rr f?Y `> A ITIM AL INt C5CMATWN Q&QV('a✓r(O • &AL WH S%Z& tS roe.- 96-C421005 FLA-k r Sari—I SV 6t2142e U P LA-t-er sv-Arr /�brt, IS 5 Gtizibt} +> 4-�-T. t) .s y 140144 566-12M `)< Signature �/ Date t j tT, 0B Agency _✓7C w 1-425 +Weld County Planning Dept. +4209 CR 24 5,Longmont,CO.80504 +(720)6524210 ext 8730 4(720)652-4211 fax �C r U A-%T W64- 4 N +- FP( wV U '19'f S tip (°711' • a DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES BUILDING INSPECTION NORTH OFFICE • WUD 918 1O0th Street 631 GREELEY, COLORADO 80631 0) 353-6100, EXT.3540 C. PHONE (97SOUTHWEST OFFICE FAX (970) 304-6498 COLORADO 4209 CR 24.5 LONGMONT CO 80504 PHONE (720)652-4210 ext. 8730 FAX (720)652-4211 January 31, 2008 Martin & Johanna Bangma Site Specific Development Plan and Special Review Permit for a Livestock confinement Operation. AmUSR-686 1. A building permit shall be obtained prior to the construction of the milking parlor, freestall barns and employee housing. 2. A plan review is required for each building for which a building permit is required. Building plans for the milking parlor and freestall barns shall bear the wet stamp of a Colorado registered architect or engineer.Two complete sets of plans are required when applying for each permit. Include a Code Analysis Data sheet which is provided by the Weld County Building Department with each Building permit application. • 3. Buildings shall conform to the requirements of the various codes adopted at the time of permit application.Currently the following has been adopted by Weld County:2006 International Building Code;2006 International Mechanical Code; 2006 International Plumbing Code; 2006 International Fuel Gas Code; and the 2005 National Electrical Code and Chapter 29 of the Weld County Code. 4. All structures will require an engineered foundation based on a site-specific geotechnical report or an open hole inspection performed by a Colorado registered engineer. Engineered foundations shall be designed by a Colorado registered engineer. 5. Fire resistance of walls and openings, construction requirements, maximum building height and allowable areas will be reviewed at the plan review. Setback and offset distances shall be determined by the Zoning Ordinance. 6. Building height shall be measured in accordance with the 2006 International Building Code for the purpose of determining the maximum building size and height for various uses and types of construction and to determine compliance with the Bulk Requirements from Chapter 23 of the Weld County Code. Building height shall be measured in accordance with Chapter 23 of the Weld County Code in order to determine compliance with offset and setback requirements. When measuring buildings to determine offset and setback requirements, buildings are measured to the farthest projection from the building. Property lines shall be clearly identified and all property pins shall be staked prior to the first site inspection. 7. Provide letter of approval Mountain View Fire protection District prior to construction of any structure. 8. There are 10 historical building permits with final approval and one expired permit on record for these parcels. Sincerely, • Roger Vigil Building Official . ( jk \\ Weld County Referral • January 4,2008 MCECEVETI O JAN . 9 2008 1COLORADO • The Weld County Department of Planning Services has received the following item for review: Applicant Martin&Johanna Bangma 1989 Case Number AMUSR-686 Trust&Rocky Mountain Fuel Company,represented by Mile • High Dairy LLC.clo Dusty McCormick/AGPROfessionals LLC Please Reply By February 1,2008 Planner Jacqueline Hatch Project Site Specific Development Plan and Special Review Permit for a Livestock Confinement Operation(1,940 head dairy including milking cows,dry cows,heifers,and calves)and one single family dwelling unit per lot other than those permitted under Section 23-3-20.A of the Weld County Code(two single family employee homes)in the A(Agricultural)Zone District. Legal A parcel being part of the E2 and Lot B of RE-525,also being part of the E2 of Section 17, T3N,R68W of the 6th P.M.,Weld County,Colorado. • Location West of and adjacent to CR 5 and north of and adjacent to CR 32. Parcel Number 120717 000014& t207 17 000027 The application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated_ Please reply by the above listed date so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. My response not received before or on this date may be deemed to be a positive response to the Department of Planning Services. If you have any further questions regarding the application, please call the Planner associated with the request. Please note that new information may beadded to applications under review during the review process. If you desire to examine or obtain this additional information,please call the Department of Planning Services. Weld County Planning Commission Hearing(if applicable) March 18,2008 O We have reviewed the request and find that it does/does not comply with our Comprehensive Plan ❑ We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests. See attached letter. Please notify me of any public hearings regarding this request. . Comments: . • Signature Date '2.--4/.og Agency a OrM&v PWel County Planning Dept. O4209 CR 24.5,Longmont,CO.50504 +1720)052-4210 ex1.0730 P(720)652-4211 fax Td wd£s:To Benz se 'RaA bbi'_SBze£0£: '0N Xtld J0SSH 2 woaaao: w0d3 • MEMORANDUM 1O: Jacqueline Hatch,Weld Coun ng PROM: Joe t,rerdom,Town Planner DATE: January 23,2008 SUBJ: Weld County Referral: AMUSR 686:Mile High Dairy On behalf of the Town of Mead,I am responding to the above captioned development referral. Based on a review of the materials submitted by Weld County, the Town has the following comments and observations concerning this proposal. This request is for the substantial expansion of an existing dairy on the north side of WCR 32 and adjacent to the west side of WCR 5. The permit application states the dairy would be on a 60 acre parcel with confined feeding pens, a new milk parlor,and other accessory buildings. The number of animals would increase from 900 to 1940,a 115%increase. The number of employee on-site housing units would be decrease from six(6)units to three(3)units. The application indicates that 41,592 tons of manure would be produce on a yearly basis. Although the existing manure storage area shown in the operation is reduce by 60%compared to the proposed new area,the application indicates there will be room for storage of 95,759 tons of manure within the permit area,The excess manure will be spread and incorporated (tilled in)on land to the west of the dairy;most will need to be hauled to third party locations in the area. The amount and location ofthese off-site locations is not indicated. Also, wastewater from animal waste and pen run-off will be collected on site and periodically discharged through pivot irrigation on a tract to the west of the dairy operation. This she is centrally located in the Mead Planning Area and is designated as medium to low density residential(1.1 to 10 dwelling units pa acre). Based on the Town's adopted plan, the location of this proposal in relationship to the Towns planning area,and other approved developments adjacent and nearby,the Board of Trustees request the applicant consider annexing into the Town of Mead. Should the County elected to process this application through the County process, the Town would request the following conditions be added as conditions of approval: 1. The number of access points is shown as five(5).This would appear to be excessive for the use at this location. The applicant has indicated to the Mead Board that the southern most access on WCR 5 could be eliminated Also, the drive way onto WCR 5 (shown on the site plan as the exit for truck circulation)should be redesigned to bring vehicles onto the road at a perpendicular intersection. • c;pl1x)M&Anwrrs • 935?ETRAS STREET,ERIE.COLORADO 80S' ; • LERL' MASSOC@M5N.COM • 303.625.5244 2d Wd£s:tO Baez 50 "cRd MM25929202: 'ON XWd 3055W 'a W0Qa39: W0N. 2. Manure and waste disposal.The current application contains little in the way of clear criteria for gauging compliance: The Town supports clear and enforceable standards for this proposal. 3. Landscaping. The proposed planting plan will have little impact on the screening goals articulated by the applicant as currently designed. An increase in trees and shrubs should be included or decreasing the spacing between trees. 4. A lighted sign is not in keeping with the character of the area. Any lighting should be from above and tightly focused so as not to cast glare into the mad or into the night sky. A low, monument sign would be compatible with the use and surrounding area. 4111 WC 01230R AMUSR 63.6. 41 <,ru11UM FYASSC!(:1A7'f'S • 93S PETRAS STREET,ERIE.COLORADO 805 16 • C1ItDOMASSOCC6'MSN.COM • 303,8213.5 244 2d Wdt'S:TO 8002 SO 'clad bbZS8Z8£0£: '0N XUd DOSSU 2 WOQa30: W02ad Weld County Planning Department ) SOUTHWEST BUILDING L FEB 07 2008 Kicert;t:, • Weld Countys'cMw& January 4, 2008 C. COLORADO The Weld County Department of Planning Services has received the following item for review: • Applicant Martin&Johanna Bangma 1989 Case Number AMUSR-686 Trust& Rocky Mountain Fuel Company, represented by Mile High Dairy LLC, do Dusty McCormick/AGPROfessionals LLC Please Reply By February 1, 2008 Planner Jacqueline Hatch Project Site Specific Development Plan and Special Review Permit for a Livestock Confinement Operation (1,940 head dairy including milking cows, dry cows, heifers, and calves)and one single family dwelling unit per lot other than those permitted under Section 23-3-20.A of the Weld County Code (two single family employee homes) in the A(Agricultural)Zone District. Legal A parcel being part of the E2 and Lot B of RE-525, also being part of the E2 of Section 17, T3N, R68W of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado. • Location West of and adjacent to CR 5 and north of and adjacent to CR 32. Parcel Number 1207 17 000014 & 1207 17 000027 The application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Please reply by the above listed date so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Any response not received before or on this date may be deemed to be a positive response to the Department of Planning Services. If you have any further questions regarding the application, please call the Planner associated with the request. Please note that new information may be added to applications under review during the review process. If you desire to examine or obtain this additional information, please call the Department of Planning Services. Weld County Planning Commission Hearing (if applicable) March 18, 2008 ❑ We have reviewed the request and find that it does/does not comply with our Comprehensive Plan ❑ We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests. Or See attached letter. ❑ Please notify me of any public hearings regarding this request. Comments: • Signature - �� Date Agency / _ e��`l `' er. c 'O. Cie'a +Weld County Planning Dept. :•4209 CR 24.5,Longmont,CO.80504 C.(720)652-4210 eta 8730 4(720)652-4211 fax • Longmont Conservation District 95-95 3cicon Ruud Box 1)-Loogmonl. Colorado X050/ - Phone (303) -Th--1034-- Fax (303) 6X4-9x92 Site Review Memo To: Longmont CD Board From: Nancy McIntyre Subject: (List site name, location, Permit#, Purpose, etc.) Martin&Johanna Bangma, Case#AMUSR-686 is a site specific development plan and a special review permit for a livestock confinement operation. The proposal is to increase the current permit for 900 cows to 1,940 total animals, add new corral areas, a new milking parlor, relocate manure storage and composting area, remove/relocate employee housing, remove/relocate commodities areas and structures, and remove/relocate storm water/process wastewater ponds. Prime Farmland: • The land is prime if irrigated. Some is currently used for cropping the remainder is currently a dairy operation. Water Quality: The Highland Ditch is on the north side of the property. Noxious Weed Control: A noxious weed plan should be developed with the Weld County Weed Department Soils Limitations: N/A Other concerns: A Comprehensive Nutrient Management Plan and a Confined Animal Feeding Operation plan needs to be developed with the Natural Resources Conservation Service. Summary comments: • Cr)1:CFRI 4TION - DEI ELOR,IIE:1T- SELF Call LR\I1E1'T • Weld County Referral January 4, 2008. JAN - 8 2008 COLORADO The Weld County Department of Planning Services has received the following item for review: Applicant Martin &Johanna Bangma 1989 Case Number AMUSR-686 Trust& Rocky Mountain Fuel Company, represented by Mile High Dairy LLC, c/o Dusty McCormick/AGPROfessionals LLC Please Reply By February 1, 2008 Planner Jacqueline Hatch Project Site Specific Development Plan and Special Review Permit for a Livestock Confinement Operation (1,940 head dairy including milking cows, dry cows, heifers, and calves)and one single family dwelling unit per lot other than those permitted under Section 23-3-20.A of the Weld County Code (two single family employee homes) in the A(Agricultural)Zone District. Legal A parcel being part of the E2 and Lot B of RE-525, also being part of the E2 of Section 17, T3N, R68W of the 6th P.M.,Weld County, Colorado. • Location West of and adjacent to CR 5 and north of and adjacent to CR 32. Parcel Number 1207 17 000014 & 1207 17 000027 The application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Please reply by the above listed date so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Any response not received before or on this date may be deemed to be a positive response to the Department of Planning Services. If you have any further questions regarding the application, please call the Planner associated with the request. Please note that new information maybe added to applications under review during the review process. If you desire to examine or obtain this additional information, please call the Department of Planning Services. Weld County Planning Commission Hearing (if applicable) March 18, 2008 ❑ We have reviewed the request and find that it does/does not comply with our Comprehensive Plan ❑ We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests. ❑ See attached letter. ❑Please notify me of any public hearings regarding this request. Comments: • Signature Date OZ/a Agency PO/3 C 64-10,-/C +Weld County Planning Dept. 44209 CR 24.5,Longmont.CO.80504 +(7201652-4210 ext.8730 :•(720)652-4211 fax Weld County Planning Department 4GREELEY OFFICE MEMORANDUM FFB 122008 ' RECEIVED TO: Jacqueline Hatch, Planning Services DATE: February 8, 2008 CFROM: Don Dunker, P.E., Public Works, COLORADO SUBJECT: AmUSR-686, Martin & Johanna Bangma 1989 Trust & Rocky Mountain Fuel Company, represented by Mile High Dairy LLC The Weld County Public Works Department has reviewed this proposal; this project falls primarily under the purview of the Use by Special Review Standards, Weld County Code, Chapter 23, Article II, Division 4, Section 23. Our comments and requirements are asiollows: COMMENTS: WCR 5 is a collector road and requires an 80-foot right-of-way at full build out. There is presently a 60-foot right-of-way. This road is maintained by Weld County. Pursuant to the definition of SETBACK in the Weld County Zoning (23-1-90), the required setback is measured from the future right-of-way line. Our most current average daily traffic count (ADT) reflects an average of 807 vehicles per day travel WCR 5 at is location. REQUIREMENTS: Storm Water Drainage: The storm water drainage will be handled by one retention (collection) pond and two settling ponds located at the southwest end of the feeding facility. The retention ponds will be maintained and operated in accordance with the Colorado Confined Animal Feeding Patrolled Regulation. I am referring the storm water drainage and the complaint to the Department of Health and Environment, which has jurisdiction over any use by special review that would deal with animal units. Please provide supporting calculations to demonstrate that the proposed pond will collect the storm water from the site for a 100-yr developed storm event per the Weld County Code (Ordinances 2001-1; 2003-10, and 2006-7). Label the working dairy operation water elevation within the pond. Label the emergency spillway, direction the spillway flows will flow, and ensure the pond side slopes are protected from erosion during an overflow condition. Please do not draft a drainage report. Circulation: All feed alleys shall be surfaced with gravel and shall be graded to prevent drainage problems. Please indicate and show that there is adequate parking and circulation throughout the milking parlor and office buildings. A 40' radius is required on all accesses to public roads for accesses designed to accommodate truck traffic. {A- minimum effective turning radius of forty (40) feet shall be used for accesses intended to accommodate truck traffic. (Weld County Codification Ordinance 2000-1)) Sec. 8-2-40 B. Road access design standards. •The applicant needs to provide more detail concerning the number of feed and silage trucks per day. adkRight-of-Way: The applicant shall indicate on the plat drawing the existing and/or future right-of-way for WCR The furthest south access into this site and onto WCR 5 shall be closed. Internal circulation can be adjusted to accomplished this closer, with the amount of traffic on this county road accesses too close together create a safety hazard with the traveling public. Easements shall be shown in accordance with County standards (Sec. 24-7-60) and/or Utility Board recommendations. Intersection sight distance triangles at accesses/entrances will be required. All landscaping within the triangles must be less than 3%feet in height at maturity • CC to File: AmUSR-686 PC by Post: Jacqueline Hatch, Planner Mile High Dairy LLC,Applicant AGPROfessionals LLC,Dusty McCormick,Agent M:\PLANNING—DEVELOPMENT REVIEW AmUSR-Amended Use by Special Review\AmUSR-686-Mile High Dairy LLC.DOC • 2 WELD COUNTY ROAD ACCESS INFORMATION SHEET Weld County Public Works Department Date: November 5, 2007 P.O. Box 758, Greeley, CO 80632 *hone: (970)356-4000, Ext. 3750 Fax: (970)304-6497 1. Applicant Name: Mile High Dairy 2. Address or location of access: 15333 WCR 5 on west side of road Part of the East 1/2 of Section 17,T3N, R68W of the 6th P.M.,Weld County,Colorado. Subdivision Block Lot Weld County Road #5 Side of Road West Distance from nearest intersection approximately .36 of a mile north of WCR 32 and WCR 5. 3. Is there an existing access to the property? Yes #accesses 5 4. Proposed Use: Existing Livestock Confinement Operation and Dairy. 5. Site Sketch Legend for Access Description: AGR=Agricultural, RES =Residential, O&G=Oil &Gas, D.R.= Ditch Road CP 34 . itch DR High1° dr G I Hones GR Porlof- AG AG _ WCP 32 AG . ��' �+ 1 WADS OFICE USE ONLY: Road ADT Date Accidents Date Road ADT Date Accidents Date Drainage Requirement Culvert Size Length Special Conditions Installation authorized Information Insufficient Reviewed By: Title: Weld County Planning Department SOUTHWEST BUILDING STATE OF COLORADO Bill Ritter,Jr.,Governor FEB 15 2008 G�� O DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES p01. • DIVISION OF WILDLIFE RECEIVED 3it AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER ON OF 6" Thomas E. Remington, Director 6060 Broadway For Wildlife- Denver, Colorado 80216 For People Telephone: (303)297-1192 wildlife.state.co.us January 30,2008 Weld County Planning Jacqueline Hatch 4209 CR 24.5 Longmont, CO 80504 Subject: Martin&Johanna Bangma 1989,case number AMUSR-686, site specific development plan and special review permit for a livestock confinement operation Dear Jacqueline: The Colorado Division of Wildlife has checked and reviewed the subject property and proposed development as to potential impacts on wildlife. According to the Colorado Division of Wildlife Natural Diversity Information • Source Maps for Weld County,this general area provides winter range for bald eagles, foraging areas and winter range and winter concentration areas for ducks and geese,and is within the overall range for pheasant and mule deer and white-tailed deer. Raptors and songbirds have also been observed in the area. In addition, a check with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service as to the Preble's Meadow Jumping Mouse may be appropriate for any development that would possibly occur near wetlands associated with the property. A row of cottonwood trees is located on the southern edge of the property.A raptor survey may be warranted to determine utilization of the area and potential impacts to raptors if disturbance is expected. Please refer to "Recommended Buffer Zones and Seasonal Restrictions for Colorado Raptors"prepared by Gerald R. Craig, Colorado Division of Wildlife, February 8, 2002. Utilization of these recommendations will assist in minimizing impacts to wildlife. Native trees and downed or dead wood on the property should be left in place for continued benefits to wildlife. Upon disturbance of any areas, noxious weeds should be monitored and controlled. Homeowners should also be aware that planting trees, shrubs and other herbaceous plants may attract wildlife which may result in damage to ornamental landscaping by wildlife. Under Colorado law, homeowners will be responsible for damages incurred as this type of damage is not eligible for reimbursement by the Division of Wildlife. Water quality may be impacted and any storage ponds should be built and maintained to minimize impacts to wildlife. Screening structures and water quality monitoring and other measures may be necessary. Close coordination with the Colorado Division of Wildlife may assist in minimizing impacts to wildlife while maintaining quality water resources in the area. The following notice is also applicable for any heavy equipment that may come in contact with any water resources in the area: If heavy equipment is acquired that was previously working in another stream, river, lake, • DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES,Harris D.Sherman,Executive Director WILDLIFE COMMISSION,Tom Burke,Chair•Claire O'Neal,Vice Chair•Robert Bray,Secretary Members,Dennis Buechler•Brad Coors•Jeffrey Crawford•Tim Glenn•Roy McAnally•Richard Ray Ex Officio Members,Hams Sherman and John Stulp pond, or wetland within 10 days of working on this project,one of the following disinfection practices is necessary to prevent the spread of New Zealand Mud Snails and other aquatic hitchhikers into this drainage. These practices are also necessary after project completion,prior to this equipment being used in another stream, river, lake, pond, or wetland,for the same purpose: • Remove all mud and debris from equipment(tracks,turrets,buckets,drags,teeth,etc.)and the equipment must be kept dry for 10 days OR • Remove all mud and debris from equipment(tracks,turrets, buckets,drags,teeth,etc.)and spray/soak equipment with a 1:1 solution of Formula 409 Household Cleaner and water. Keep equipment moist for at least 10 minutes OR • Remove all mud and debris from equipment(tracks, turrets, buckets, drags,teeth,etc.)and spray/soak equipment with water greater than 130 degrees F for at least 10 minutes. • Clean hand tools, boots,and any other equipment that will be used in the water using one of the above options as well. Homeowners should also be made aware of the presence of native predators. Pets should not be allowed to roam free. All domestic livestock and farm animals should be secured with wildlife proof fencing appropriate for the species being raised. Pets as well may negatively interact with wildlife even on the home-sites and homeowners will be responsible for handling these problems. Homeowners should secure pet and animal feeds,trash containers, and charcoal/gas grills. Pets should have current shots. All control of nuisance wildlife will be the homeowner's responsibility with the possible exception of bears and mountain lions. The developers may wish to review the Division publication: Developing with Wildlife in Mind. Homeowners and potential homeowners will find additional recommendations and information in these Division of Wildlife publications: "Living With Wildlife In Coyote Country", "Living With Wildlife: Canada Geese", "Don't Feed the Wildlife", and"Too Close For Comfort". Homeowners should also be aware that hunting may be an ongoing fall and winter activity on lands surrounding the development. Shooting will occur normally in the early mornings until dark on these areas. The sounds of gunfire may be somewhat distracting,yet should be noted to the potential owners and developer. Thank you for your consideration of these comments. If you have any questions regarding these comments, please contact District Wildlife Manager Suzanne Kloster at 303-485-0593. Sincerely, Mark Leslie Area Wildlife Manager cc: Kathi Green,Acting Northeast Regional Manager John Bredehoft,Assistant Director Suzanne Kloster, DWM File: Mark Leslie,Area Wildlife Manager Area 2 files • ! | 0 ) k o CO cro 3 ; z 41) ) I 2 C k k § § 2 « % § 0 § $ k § ■ i % 21 CO 2 § • § ow , § ' 0 = co ci . A ■ 0 N 'C k / e "0 2 a) Z" E E u. O a as es § N § § § \ k § N N \ { « CO 0 12 40 { CO O ) u.C f oo co ! E f 0 k 2 O CO CO 0 0 - - 0 • RECOMMENDED* BUFFER ZONES AND SEASONAL RESTRICTIONS FOR COLORADO RAPTORS *These zones and seasonal restrictions are recommended as guidance only and may be subject to change. They do not represent official Division policy. Prepared By Gerald R.Craig Colorado Division of Wildlife Updated February 8,2002 Tolerance limits to disturbance vary among as well as within raptor species. As a rule, ferruginous hawks and golden eagles respond to human activities at greater distances than do ospreys and kestrels. Some individuals within a species also habituate and tolerate human activity at a proximity that would cause the majority of the group to abandon their nests. Other individuals become sensitized to repeated encroachment and react at greater distances. The tolerance of a particular pair may change when a mate is replaced with a less tolerant individual and this may cause the pair to react to activities that were previously ignored. Responses will also vary depending upon the reproductive stage. Although the level of stress is the same, the pair may be more secretive during egg laying and incubation and more demonstrative when the chicks hatch. The term "disturbance" is ambiguous and experts disagree on what actually constitutes a disturbance. Reactions may be as subtle as elevated pulse rate or as obvious as vigorous • defense or abandonment. Impacts of disturbance may not be immediately evident. A pair of raptors may respond to human intrusion by defending the nest, but well after the disturbance has passed, the male may remain in the vicinity for protection rather than forage to feed the nestlings. Golden eagles rarely defend their nests, but merely fly a half mile or more away and perch and watch. Chilling and over heating of eggs or chicks and starvation of nestlings can result from human activities that appeared not to have caused an immediate response. A `holistic' approach is recommended when protecting raptor habitats. While it is important for land managers to focus on protecting nest sites, equal attention should focus on defining important foraging areas that support the pair's nesting effort. Hunting habitats of many raptor species are extensive and may necessitate interagency cooperation to assure the continued nest occupancy. Unfortunately, basic knowledge of habitat use is lacking and may require documentation through telemetry investigations or intensive observation. Telemetry is expensive and may be disruptive so a more practical approach is to assume that current open space is important and should be protected. Although there are exceptions, the buffer areas and seasonal restrictions suggested here reflect an informed opinion that if implemented, should assure that the majority of individuals within a species will continue to occupy the area. Measurements are somewhat imprecise (fractions of a mile) and reflect the need to maintain some flexibility to adjust buffer zones depending upon intervening terrain and vegetation • screens that obscure the activity. This document is intended to be modified and refined as additional information becomes available,hence the provision of a revision date. BALD EAGLE Nest Site: Year around closure to surface occupancy* (beyond that which historically occurred in the area) within 'A mile radius of nest. No human encroachment from November 15 through July 31 within '/2 mile radius of the nest. This closure is more extensive than the Northern States Bald Eagle Recovery Plan due to the generally open habitat used by Colorado's nesting bald eagles. Aside from four Colorado sites in coniferous forests, all others are in cottonwood riparian zones that don't have the vegetational density, and therefore obscurity offered by the habitats in the lake states. Recent evidence suggests that pairs nesting at lower elevations frequent and maintain their nests throughout the year. If it is necessary to work within the '/2 mile buffer, the intrusion should be restricted to August 15 through October 15. Winter Night Roost: Activity should be eliminated within 1/4 mile radius of winter roosts between November 15 and March 15. If periodic visits (such as oil well maintenance work) are required within the buffer zone after development, activity should be restricted to the period between 1000 and 1400 hours from November 15 to March 15. Limited restrictions may be necessary out to '/2 mile if there is a direct line of sight from the roost to the activities. Hunting Perch: Diurnal perches associated with important foraging areas should also be protected from human encroachment. Preferred perches may be at varying distances from human • encroachment and buffer areas will vary. However, at least 2 management plans recommend zones that range from 1/8 mile (200 meters) to 1/4 mile (400 meters) depending upon topographic or vegetational screening. GOLDEN EAGLE Nest Site: No surface occupancy* (beyond that which historically occurred in the area) within 1/4 mile radius of the nest site and associated alternate nests. Seasonal restriction to human encroachment within '/a mile of the nest and any alternate nests from January 1 to July 15. OSPREY Nest Site: No surface occupancy* (beyond that which historically occurred in the area) within 1/4 mile of the nest site. Seasonal restriction to human encroachment within ''A mile of the nest from April 1 to August 31. Some osprey populations have habituated and are tolerant to human activity in the immediate vicinity of their nests. FERRUGINOUS HAWK Nest Site: No surface occupancy* (beyond that which historically occurred in the area) within '/2 mile radius of the nest site, and associated alternate nests. Seasonal restriction to human encroachment within ''A mile of the nest and any alternate nests from February 1 to July • 15. This species is especially prone to nest abandonment during incubation if disturbed. * Surface occupancy includes human habitation as well as non-human habitation,examples of which would be oil and gas wells,tanks,roads,tracks,trails,etc. • RED-TAILED HAWK Nest Site: No surface occupancy* (beyond that which historically occurred in the area) within 1/3 mile radius of the nest site, and associated alternate nests. Some members of this species have adapted to urbanization and may tolerate human habitation to within 200 yards of their nest. Development that encroaches on rural sites is likely to cause abandonment. Seasonal restriction to human encroachment should be in effect from February 15 to July 15. SWAINSON'S HAWK Nest Site: No surface occupancy* (beyond that which historically occurred in the area) within 1/4 mile radius of the nest site, and associated alternate nests. Some members of this species have adapted to urbanization and may tolerate human habitation to within 100 yards of their nest. Seasonal restriction to human encroachment within 1/4 mile of the nest from April 1 to July 15. PEREGRINE FALCON Nest Site: No surface occupancy* (beyond that which historically occurred in the area) within 'h mile of the nest site. Seasonal restriction to human encroachment within '/z mile of the nest cliff(s) from March 15 to July 31. A 1 mile buffer with a closure from February 1 to • August 31 was originally stipulated in the approved Recovery Plan, but recent field evidence suggests that the zone can be reduced to %z mile. Due to propensity to relocate nest sites, sometimes up to '/z mile along cliff faces, it is more appropriate to designate 'Nesting Areas' that encompass the cliff system and a '/z mile buffer around the cliff complex. PRAIRIE FALCON Nest Site: No surface occupancy* (beyond that which historically occurred in the area) within '/z mile radius of the nest site. GOSHAWK Reynolds et al. (1993) proposed 30 acres for the nest, a post fledge family area of 420 acres, and a foraging area of 5400 acres in size that encompasses habitat for squirrels, rabbits, jays, woodpeckers and grouse. For purposes here, it seems that a buffer of '/z mile around the nest should protect the integrity of the nesting and post fledging effort. Occupancy of the nesting and brood rearing area takes place from early March through late September. • BURROWING OWL Nest Site: *Surface occupancy includes human habitation as well as non-human habitation,examples of which would be oil and gas wells,tanks,roads,tracks,trails,etc. • No human encroachment or disturbance within 75 yards of the nest site from April 1 through July 31. This period is necessary to avoid disturbing nesting owls. However, owls may be present at burrows up to a month before egg laying and several months after young have fledged. Therefore it is recommended that efforts to eradicate prairie dogs or destroy abandoned towns not occur between March 1 and October 31 when owls may be present. Although owls may occur throughout a prairie dog colony, they have a propensity to frequent the colony margins and buffer zones should be applied to the colony perimeter. Measures that protect and enhance prairie dog colonies will benefit this species. Buffers Documented in the Literature Species Period Optimal Authority Incubation Brood Distance Ferruginous Hawk 380-488yd. 619-781yd 781yd. (.45mi) Holmes Red-tailed Hawk 448-553yd 428-604yd 604yd (.34mi) Holmes Swainson's Hawk 171-203yd 309-382yd 382yd. (.22mi) Holmes Prairie Falcon 500-1000m 1000m Holthuijzen et al. • 546-1093yd 1093yd (.62mi.) Perch Buffers The following buffers for perches were recommended by T. Holmes (1994) to prevent flushing of 90%of raptors wintering in rangeland and agricultural habitats. SPECIES BUFFER AREA (Radius) American Kestrel 75m Merlin 125m Prairie Falcon 160m Rough-legged Hawk 210m Ferruginous Hawk 140m Golden Eagle 300m REFERENCES Call, M. 1979. Habitat management guides for birds of prey. Technical Note No.338, U.S. Bureau of Land Management, Denver Service Center, Denver, CO. 69pp. • * Surface occupancy includes human habitation as well as non-human habitation,examples of which would be oil and gas wells,tanks,roads,tracks,trails,etc. • Greater Yellowstone Bald Eagle Working Group. 1996. Greater Yellowstone bald eagle management plan: 1995 update. Greater Yellowstone Bald Eagle Working Group, Wyoming Game & Fish Dept., Lander WY 82520. 47pp Grier, J.W., F.J. Gramlich, J. Mattisson, J.E. Mathisen, J.V. Kussman, J.B. Elder, and N.F. Green. 1983. The bald eagle in the northern United States. Bird Cons. 144-66. Holmes, Tamara L. 1993. Behavioral responses of grassland raptors to human disturbance MS Thesis. Colo. State Univ, Ft. Collins. 62pp. Holthuijzen, A.M.A., W.G. Eastland, A.R. Ansell, M.N. Kochert, R.D. Williams, and L.S. Young. 1990. Effects of blasting on behavior and productivity of nesting prairie falcons. Wildl. Soc. Bull. 18:270-281. Martin, D.J. 1973. Selected aspects of burrowing owl ecology and behavior. Condor 75:446-456. Northern States Bald Eagle Recovery Team. 1983. Northern States Bald Eagle Recovery Plan. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 75pp. Reynolds, Richard R.T. Graham, H.M. Reiser. 1992. Management recommendations for the northern goshawk in the southwestern United States. Gen. Tech. Rep. • RM-217. Ft. Collins, CO. U.S. Dept of Agri., Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. 90pp. Richardson, Cary T. and C.K. Miller. 1997. Recommendations for protecting raptors from human disturbance: a review. Wildl. Soc. Bull. 25(3):634-638. Rocky Mountain/Southwest Peregrine Falcon Recovery Team. 1984. American peregrine falcon Rocky Mountain/Southwest population recovery plan. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Serv. 105pp. Squires, J.R., S.H. Anderson, and R. Oakleaf. 1993. Home range size and habitat-use patterns of nesting prairie falcons near oil developments in northeastern Wyoming. J. Field Ornithol. 64:1-10. Swenson, J.E. 1979. Factors affecting status and reproduction of ospreys in Yellowstone National Park. J. Wildl. Manage. 43:595-601. Thomsen, L. 1971. Behavior and ecology of burowing owls on the Oakland Municipal Airport. Condor 73:177-192. • * Surface occupancy includes human habitation as well as non-human habitation,examples of which would be oil and gas wells,tanks,roads,tracks,trails,etc. iatit ' County Referral • d 4iuntypiannjng !t%&d REELEY OFFICE IIIIJfl FEB 2 2 2008 January 4, 2008 CM/ED COLORADO The Weld County Department of Planning Services has received the following item for review: Applicant Martin &Johanna Bangma 1989 Case Number AMUSR-686 Trust& Rocky Mountain Fuel Company, represented by Mile High Dairy LLC, c/o Dusty McCormick/AGPROfessionals LLC Please Reply By February 1, 2008 Planner Jacqueline Hatch Project Site Specific Development Plan and Special Review Permit for a Livestock Confinement Operation (1,940 head dairy including milking cows, dry cows, heifers, and calves)and one single family dwelling unit per lot other than those permitted under Section 23-3-20.A of the Weld County Code(two single family employee homes)in the A(Agricultural)Zone District. Legal A parcel being part of the E2 and Lot B of RE-525, also being part of the E2 of Section 17, T3N, R68W of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado. • Location West of and adjacent to CR 5 and north of and adjacent to CR 32. Parcel Number 1207 17 000014 & 1207 17 000027 The application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Please reply by the above listed date so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Any response not received before or on this date may be deemed to be a positive response to the Department of Planning Services. If you have any further questions regarding the application, please call the Planner associated with the request. Please note that new information may be added to applications under review during the review process. If you desire to examine or obtain this additional information, please call the Department of Planning Services. Weld County Planning Commission Hearing (if applicable) March 18, 2008 ❑ We have reviewed the request and find that it does/does not comply with our Comprehensive Plan _O �lNe have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests. See attached letter. ❑ Please notify me of any public hearings regarding this request. Comments: • Signature Date ��.Z cr Agency Zel S,L® . 7 ceel-//- Weld County Planning Dept. •?4209 CR 24.5.Longmont,CO.80504 4+(720)652-4210 ex1.8730 +(720)652-4211 fax Weld County Sheriffs • Office M e mo To: Jacqueline Hatch From: Ken Poncelow Date: February 22,2008 Re: AMUSR-686 The Sheriffs Office approves this plan. Please notify the developer/owner that the Sheriffs Office would be willing to assist in the development of a security plan for the site free of charge. If this is of interest, please have them contact me. • • • MEMORANDUM 0-41t: TO: JACQUELINE HATCH, DEPT OF PLANNING SERVICES IFROM: LAUREN LIGHT O OHADATEN MARCH 7MA2 18 9 TRUST H DAIRY— MARTIN AND COLORADO The Weld County Department of Public Health and Environment has reviewed this application to amend the existing Use by Special Review Permit for a dairy operation. The amendment will increase the number of livestock from 900 to 1940, add new corral areas and milking parlor, relocate manure storage and composting areas, remove/relocate employee housing, and remove/relocate storm water/process wastewater ponds. Potable water is provided from Little Thompson Water District. Individual Sewage Disposal Systems provide sewer provisions. Septic permit G19810123 for the residential house and two mobile homes, that are to be removed per applicants USR map, shall be properly abandoned or reviewed by a Colorado Registered Professional Engineer if the system will be utilized for a different • use. Septic permits G19810124, G19860257 and G19850030 have been approved for existing uses. If the uses are changed, the permits shall be evaluated by a Colorado Registered Professional Engineer to ensure compliance with the Weld County Individual Sewage Disposal Regulations. We have no objections to the proposal, however, we do recommend that the following conditions be part of any approval: We recommend that the following requirements be met prior to allowing the plat to be recorded: 1. Provide documentation, prepared by a Colorado Registered Professional Engineer, that all wastewater impoundments for the confined animal feeding operation (CAFO) meet seepage rate standards of Colorado Water Quality Control Commission Regulation 81 [81.5(2)]. 2. Provide evidence that a Standard Operating Procedure for sludge and manure removal (cleaning of impoundments to maintain capacity) has been submitted for approval to the Colorado Water Quality Control Division required by Colorado Water Quality Control Commission Regulation Number 81 [81.5 (3)]. • 3. Demonstrate that wastewater impoundments meet required setbacks to water wells and groundwater required by Colorado Water Quality Control Commission Regulation Number 81. [81.5 (6)]. 4. Provide evidence that a CAFO Colorado Discharge Permit has been applied for or obtained from the Colorado Water Quality Control Division. 5. If Septic permit G19810123 is abandoned it shall be abandoned in accordance with Section 30-7-70 of the Weld County Code pertaining to individual sewage disposal systems. In the event the applicant intends to utilize the existing septic system, the septic system shall be reviewed by a Colorado Registered Professional Engineer. The review shall consist of observation of the system and a technical review describing the systems ability to handle the proposed hydraulic load. The review shall be submitted to the Environmental Health Services Division of the Weld County Department of Public Health and Environment. In the event the system is found to be inadequately sized or constructed the system shall be brought into compliance with current Regulations. 6. If the uses are changed for septic permits G19810124, G19860257 and . G19850030, the permits shall be evaluated by a Colorado Registered Professional Engineer to ensure compliance with the Weld County Individual Sewage Disposal Regulations. We recommend that the following requirements be incorporated into the permit as conditions that must be met prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy for the new milking parlor: 1. An individual sewage disposal system is required for the proposed facility and shall be installed according to the Weld County Individual Sewage Disposal Regulations. We recommend that the following requirements be incorporated into the permit as development standards: 1. The facility shall operate in compliance with Colorado Water Quality Control Commission Regulation Number 81. 2. The facility shall maintain CAFO Colorado Discharge Permit coverage and operate in compliance with Colorado Water Quality Control Commission Regulation Number 61. There shall be no discharge of manure or process wastewater into surface water from the production area, except as provided in the facilities CAFO Colorado Discharge Permit. • 2 3. Manure and process wastewater shall be applied at agronomic rates. There shall be no discharge from land application areas except for agricultural stormwater. 4. The facility shall be operated and maintained in a manner to prevent nuisance conditions and operate in accordance with the Management Plan for Nuisance Control submitted with the application materials. 5. The facility shall control fugitive dust on this site and be operated and maintained in a manner to prevent nuisance conditions. The facility shall be operated in accordance, at all times, with their current approved Management Plan for Nuisance Control. 6. The facility shall be operated in a manner to control pests. The facility shall be operated in accordance, at all times, with their current approved Management Plan for Nuisance Control. Additional control measures shall be implemented at the request of the Weld County Department of Public Health and Environment in the event that rodents (which can be determined to be associated with the facility) are in such a number to be considered a nuisance condition. • 7. The facility shall be operated in a manner to control flies. The facility shall be operated in accordance, at all times, with their current approved Management Plan for Nuisance Control. Additional fly control measures shall be implemented at the request of the Weld County Department of Public Health and Environment in the event that flies (which can be determined to be associated with the facility) are in such a number to be considered a nuisance condition. Additional controls shall also be implemented in the event the Weld County Department of Public Health and Environment receives a significant number of fly (associated with facility) complaints, and in the judgment of the Weld County Health Officer, there exists a fly condition requiring abatement. 8. The facility shall be operated in a manner to control odors. The facility shall be operated in accordance, at all times, with their current approved Management Plan for Nuisance Control. Odors detected off site shall not equal or exceed the level of fifteen-to-one dilution threshold, as measured using methods set forth in Regulation 2 of the Colorado Air Pollution Control Regulations. Additional controls shall be implemented at the request of the Weld County Department of Public Health and Environment in the event odor levels detected off site of the facility meet or exceed the level of fifteen-to-one dilution threshold, or in the judgment of the Weld County Health Officer, there exists an odor condition requiring abatement. 9. The applicant shall remove, handle, and stockpile manure from the livestock area in a manner that will prevent nuisance conditions. The manure piles shall not be • 3 allowed to exist or deteriorate to a condition that facilitates excessive odors, flies, insect pests, or pollutant runoff. The surface beneath the manure storage areas shall be of materials which are protective of State waters. These areas shall be constructed to minimize seepage or percolation of manure contaminated water. In no event shall the facility impact or degrade waters of the State in violation of Colorado Water Quality Control Commission Regulation Number 81. 10. Any Individual Sewage Disposal System (I.S.D.S.) on the property shall be permitted, installed, maintained and operated in compliance with Weld County I.S.D.S. Regulations. 11. The facility shall operate in compliance with applicable Colorado Air Quality Control Commission Regulations. There shall be no open burning except "agricultural open burning" as defined by Colorado Air Quality Control Commission's Regulation 9. 12. There shall be no permanent disposal of solid wastes, as defined in the Regulations Pertaining to Solid Waste Disposal Sites and Facilities (6 CCR 1007- 2), at this site. This is not meant to include those wastes specifically excluded • from the definition of a solid waste in the Solid Wastes Disposal Sites and Facilities Act, 30-20-100.5, C.R.S., as amended. 13. The facility shall adhere to the maximum permissible noise levels allowed in the Light Industrial Zone as delineated in Section 25-12-103 C.R.S, as amended. 14. Waste materials, not specifically addressed by other development standards, shall be handled, stored, and disposed in a manner that controls fugitive dust, blowing debris, and other potential nuisance conditions. 15. The applicant shall comply with all provisions of the Underground and Above Ground Storage Tank Regulations (7 CCR 1101-14). 16. Adequate handwashing and toilet facilities shall be provided for employees and patrons of the facility. 17. If applicable, the applicant shall obtain a stormwater discharge permit from the Colorado Department of Public Health & Environment, Water Quality Control Division. • 4 Hello