The URL can be used to link to this page

Browse Search

Home My WebLink About20081681.tiff Page 1 of 2 Kim Ogle IIIFrom: Jeff Stewart[Jeff.Stewart@woodward.com] Sent: Monday, June 02, 2008 3:22 PM To: Kim Ogle Subject: RE: USR-1654 Mr. Kim Ogle, Thank you for sending this to me. I am disappointed in the recommendation for approval since it does not adequately address concerns dealing with traffic flow and safety. Please consider the following information in your decision. The intersections of CR66 with both CR43 and CR41 are not adequate to safely accommodate the Semi tractor- trucks that the permit references. Semi tractor-trucks cannot make the turn west on CR66 from CR43 south nor can they make the corner from CR66 east onto CR43 south. This means that the trucks will be using both lanes of CR43 and CR66 to make the turns. Given the high speed of the traffic flow on CR43 this will be very dangerous and will result in accidents. You may recall the tragic incident on hwy 392 last year where a beet truck collision resulted in the death of a local woman. Our driveway is on CR 43 and due to the volume and speed of the traffic we often have to wait a considerable period to safely turn onto CR43. This is the same traffic the trucks on CR66 will see as they seek to turn either north or south, except that they will always need to use both lanes of CR43 to navigate the turn. The Semi • tractor-trucks trucks turning onto CR66 west from CR43 they will not be able to make the corner when there is a vehicle in the east bound lane of CR66. In addition during the haul period there is no location for the trucks to park while waiting to unload. Since CR66 which has no shoulders to accommodate parking, these trucks will be sitting in the CR66 east bound and westbound lanes creating another dangerous situation for traffic. The school bus travels this road every morning and afternoon. It is unreasonable to put the school bus and its passengers in a dangerous situation by expecting the school bus to navigate between farm trucks on a busy road in order to get these children home. A proposed beet dump on CR43 and O'street just two miles to the south was rejected a few years ago for traffic safety reasons. This current proposed location has exactly the same problems as the previous site on CR43. If anything this site is significantly worse than the previously rejected site since that site had a four way stop. I feel that the approval of this proposal will result in an unsafe traffic conditions for the people of Weld County. These future accidents are avoidable by instructing the applicant to find an appropriate site capable of safely accommodate the traffic the beet dump will generate. Thank you, Jeff Stewart • . . 7..„. • • 06/02/2008 2008-1681 Page 2 of 2 • Original Message From: Kim Ogle [mailto:kogle@co.weld.co.us] Sent: Monday, June 02, 2008 1:53 PM To: Jeff Stewart Subject: as requested Kim Ogle(Planning Manager T:970 356 4000 x 3549 F.970 304 6498 Weld County Planning Services-Greeley Office 918 Tenth Street(Greeley CO 80631 kogleh co.weldco.us *** The information in this e-mail is confidential and intended solely for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If you have received this e-mail in error please notify the sender by return e-mail delete this e-mail and refrain from any disclosure or action based on the information. • • 06/02/2008 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS' SIGN POSTING CERTIFICATE • THE LAST DAY TO POST THE SIGN IS JUNE 8, 2008 THE SIGN SHALL BE POSTED ADJACENT TO AND VISIBLE FROM A PUBLICALLY MAINTAINED ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY. IN THE EVENT THE PROPERTY BEING CONSIDERED FOR A SPECIAL REVIEW IS NOT ADJACENT TO A PUBLICALLY MAINTAINED ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY, THE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES SHALL POST ONE SIGN IN THE MOST PROMINENT PLACE ON THE PROPERTY AND POST A SECOND SIGN AT THE POINT AT WHICH THE DRIVEWAY (ACCESS DRIVE) INTERSECTS A PUBLICALLY MAINTAINED ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY. I, KIM OGLE, HEREBY CERTIFY UNDER PENALTIES OF PERJURY THAT THE SIGN WAS POSTED ON THE PROPERTY AT LEAST TEN DAYS BEFORE THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS HEARING FORA SITE SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND SPECIAL REVIEW PERMIT FOR AN AGRICULTURAL SERVICE ESTABLISHMENT PRIMARILY ENGAGED IN PERFORMING AGRICULTURAL, ANIMAL HUSBANDRY OR HORTICULTURAL SERVICES ON A FEE OR CONTRACT BASIS, INCLUDING SORTING, GRADING AND PACKING FRUITS AND VEGETABLES FOR THE GROWER (HANDLING AND STORAGE OF SUGAR BEETS) IN THE AGRICULTURAL ZONE DISTRICT. KIM OGLE Name of Person Posting Sign • rug Signatur erson Posting Sign STATE OF COLORADO ) ss. COUNTY OF WELD i � ?? in � The foregoing instrument was subscribed and swe this/3 day of it X"p , 2008. WITNESS my hand and official seal. ' 41D,I"INi ‘`It $Ip t (1T9) ) ry Nota Public tt�� CFC000ePo� My Commission Expires: KT`7 k—.OO • Y _ Pri I lir Ai � ''�♦.i 04.• . ♦ 1.-• e• ({ !f •ss' _ l" •f .tr' �Th ,i'*I4 42,4; �� `/ ' y1 \•r, Jy.1 p:VC, • 4-::).746. ‘‘,j - ' •! 1 ' - - -,'\•' •r _(`r �. . ` f � •I • + /��•► t't f •! {J jJA �f-. 1 ( IlDWAIWril.` 104. � ) .� \ �f(�I•y� ♦ ,�' 'F 1t; pffn- \ r I • '' , { �• - � �,.Nil . I . . 1 / �� \� • .41.1.41. .24" • !4 Yle ,,{•f \� • .1 .. .9 • , ." Si , . .1. 1/4 , '1, -•.) , , th., # kt, # a:' 1 f i 4 • . 'Hs Ayr- • • 1 ' 'Y. • 11 S- a . �� •, II P tt •� 1• •I .1 J•+,\4 .l •0 j y ♦ •'. • • �.•) , ✓i � r ��cit. ,{ b „ • . = ,,,ii i •, 4. Y .i.It4ir ;1 may+ y{- de ... /it f ✓ .+. - �-/ . ) .��'�t ,. 0i,•4 j _ ' ..1 gs sjair 't ` ,A e, . + 'TN '� •1, prJ.•},t p`.a 1. r. f s ! •1_ 4 mow,.. • ! . � s 1 •--,* n ., ♦ ;•6 _-ot..� fr ' . . �" ' s� 1• y r� rr4 ,� � ;\1.�j�t !V•.I \\ ) � � r' � / ' .. ! 4• ••� , ; 1 ICJ ,;� ' y ,+ I: 1 }l. �K it.., . • 4 f C 1 / •) 4_ , ,,, .7 tr e .yaw arsi.mpe,- J r %f 4 \ .e...fri . , e : le:, (LI...m.1 ( Ati, ,,,,,,,,t,,,i.,i4;/ :T.:. its *6".."--...... . .. - • 2 4 -. ty ti. b?..to • ; J• 4 ,.* . . .r , • 2 0 _ ek Cr .... c-_,) `C; 4.—". p (5 Z� rs • C o U tl If CD 0 .. , x C L_ _ CC C> >, al �-�— w °' U O 0) a) CO ej,j g o ternJ 0 AI c� p U are Q a) W c U) 1 I las .0 c ..c. ;IIII eit ° O g D Z gQ can p c Liu .... ti) Ill , Q � O air- 3V �, _ - , t a (13 1 o Q Cr • Y . " It ;_ t € 0.. _. 41Or d • 0. 44 ' 4 • I. • .444 + 4 i 1 • A .Sict k 4/1 IP t ✓ 'del r t ♦ 4 1 t� j r �f l .' (, n, III ll IA .. ,J 4 i ' 1 , l CV r1 �, 11 ` 1 _ Si ;•Mail .'u^ i re . II' 1 -%) Vii' rt Weld County Referral hiDe Jeld CyPniDtmentApril 25, 2008 GREELEY OFFICE JUN 4 2008 COLORADO RECEIVED The Weld County Department of Planning Services has received the following item for review: Applicant Western Sugar Cooperative Case Number USR-1654 c/o Mike Otto Please Reply By May 25, 2008 Planner Kim Ogle Project Site Specific Development Plan and Special Review Permit for an Agricultural Service establishment primarily engaged in performing agricultural, animal husbandry or horticultural services on a fee or contract basis, including Sorting, Grading and Packing fruits and vegetables for the grower(handling and storage of sugar beets) in the Agricultural Zone District. Legal E2NE4 Section 28, T6N, R65W of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado. Location West of and adjacent to CR 43; South of and adjacent to CR 66. • Parcel Number 0803 28 000075 The application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Please reply by the above listed date so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Any response not received before or on this date may be deemed to be a positive response to the Department of Planning Services. If you have any further questions regarding the application, please call the Planner associated with the request. Please note that new information may be added to applications under review during the review process. If you desire to examine or obtain this additional information, please call the Department of Planning Services. Weld County Planning Commission Hearing (if applicable) June 3, 2008 ❑ We have reviewed the request and find that it does/does not comply with our Comprehensive Plan ❑ We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests. Cr See attached letter. ❑ Please notify me of any public hearings regarding this request. Comments: /5:-24-4.7J ,i . �✓Yab�s� �a S'f /k;r Signature /i�=— f/A�/ Date S • Agency WL +Weld County Pla ing Dept. +918 10th Street,Greeley, O.80631 •,(970)353-6100 ext.3540 4•(970)30 1,44 fa„ 11Rffy ly/�[/flf11111NIY • wwwgxynet O//I. May 20, 2008 Weld County Department of Planning Services Mr. Kim Ogle, Planner 918 10th Street Greeley, CO 80631 RE: Weld County Referral—Case No. USR 1654 Dear Mr. Ogle, The Greeley-Weld County Airport Authority has reviewed the subject Use for Special Review and offers the following Comments: This Use for Special Review is located in the Airport Zoning Overlay District, as adopted by Weld County Ordinance and on the border of the Airport Influence area as depicted in the 2004 Greeley-Weld County Airport Master Plan. The proposed Special Review is also within the established aircraft traffic pattern for Runway 16/34 and in close proximity to the aircraft traffic pattern for Runway 9/27. The Runway Zoning Overlay District will probably not be affected, because this area • concerns the height of structures. Any future structure proposed on this property could be subject to an FAA Aeronautical Study under Part 77 of the Code of Federal Regulations. Although the Authority has no specific objection to this Use of Special Review, its proximity to the airport and location within the above noted areas should be documented for the record with the current and any future property owners. It is recommended that statements concerning the proximity to these areas be included on any final plat recorded for this property. If you have any further questions, please contact me at(970) 336-3002. Sincerely, Kevin M. Freiberg, A.C.E. Assistant Manager • PO Box 727 • Greeley. CO 80632 • (970) 336-3000 • FAX (970) 336-3030 r 71 CO 0 1 W 11 _ .1. ,A. -• .. t '4:-t r- / \ \ ..../ ken 1 0 It-I; CO 1 J M r - - • - + O � w .Y _ __ ,;fit ', Si I d. < �-- O = D ' 1• 0 w O = t,' i I LI - 10 II i 1 ' 1 .. r { •e=s: 1eeS' `.yL1-im 1Mv -aiir. .`___r�. rav�`r�cTara►wiw��avarar�•TiG.TS^�r -•'mil,7!Ai►�-•Tian tit\ Ii r i It a itt I C' ' -e-4&- wort;- , ',' UUi LUwc wa TA Lei •.- , Daw w / i=c)So!-aatW Cn J /' ` ov�cWi��otall � , 03w , A....n....N 4. . , LL 6L_ L.L. I( -; -1 (. it .. . h �• � i �= • f . I �U — ► 1 rI' • \ \ i III II) S • _ I 111 % Z t. 'It] u., : ;'1 , 00 �rygaW LLZi M�7aW • I J.- IOF �tW a.-1N tW I O. U UQb�ao tq ,` t-. U.Ud-d'-wt� I • hilli \1/4)\ CA . • f :., P X ' MD I et\ H — Y all f I t lk - A-- ;: up Cr _ (DI IL __. y •NF.-o-s. w ^ ' R Y� �p 1 fryI F p d Zihr iiis � 1alai, ti.284iDit In ivi o;dd nd �I cawsJA 1 .a! 'J v� aim . % `. 1 ' I • r. ,. ,,, Wk.. fir,'` ys , , • J Nt- - 6,• �, �; . ` , •,,s ,- , r EXHIBIT r `'i..“1.1 .a`. t ' I I ' • - - y � .�.'•t'�,ti.'' a-' ` i' ./=k • .O: 2014.4., Nsik4„ .0.3 H ,_ � i1� Ja � �s I o0 o l LEI v� 1 I -�144r1 LLI J a ~ CC I S 0, ° < o 0 Q a o toa ce a_ LI cc a_ W V 0) \- I O) PP Od0H Al N/70 07744 1 0 . .. _ _ _.. _�.��. . -a - ate. _ _. i1-�'i.L -+i�� _ ��-�.��_ + . nr4..�:r... __. �"� i Jr �ryM 1S l / NrilY Li • I ' 1 (..----;; • .1 co m a • o I I I I In / 0 : : : • cn o I I w a vLii :.\/.. i-LH-4 . "c • I I I L4J I In I I MEMORANDUM • 11ige, TO: Board of County Commissioners COLORADO DATE: June 18, 2008 FROM: .•Chris Gathman — Department of Planning Services & Don Dunker— Department of Public Works SUBJECT: Recommended Conditions of Approval for USR-1654 The Departments of Planning Services and Public Works are recommending that the following conditions of approval be added to USR-1654: Condition 1.G: The applicant shall complete all proposed improvements inclydinil as halt and culvert improvements associated enlarging the turning radius on the NWAetrt Yr eF o`1rCounty Road 43 and County Road 66 to 36-feet, and the installation of bollards (if necessary)to protect the existing power pole to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works or enter into an Off-Site Improvements Agreement according to policy regarding collateral for improvements and post adequate collateral for all required materials. If an improvements agreement is necessary, the applicant shall submit a draft Improvements Agreement According to Policy Regarding Collateral for Improvements (Public Road Maintenance). The Agreement shall be reviewed and approved by the Department of Public Works.The applicant shall submit a signed copy of the Improvements Agreement along with the appropriate collateral. The agreement and collateral shall be approved and accepted by the Board of County Commissioners prior to recording the Final Plat. Condition 1.H: The applicant shall complete all proposed improvements including placing an 18- inch corrugated metal pipe with flared end sections and a trash rack at bo hha)ions with an • adequate turning radius of 40-feet, replacement of the culvert at the tank most cess, additional pavement from County Road 66 south 100-feet at both the point of ingress and point of egress, the installation of two cattle guards at the point of egress and the installation of a stop sign at the point of egress to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works or enter into an On-Site Improvements Agreement according to policy regarding collateral for improvements and post adequate collateral for all required materials. If an improvements agreement is necessary, the applicant shall submit a draft Improvements Agreement According to Policy Regarding Collateral for Improvements(Private Road Maintenance). The Agreement shall be reviewed and approved by the Departments of Planning Services and Public Works. The applicant shall submit a signed copy of the Improvements Agreement along with the appropriate collateral. The agreement and collateral shall be approved and accepted by the Board of County Commissioners prior to recording the Final Plat. • �R Hello