The URL can be used to link to this page

Browse Search

Home My WebLink About20083155.tiff STOP 0 STREET PETITION Online Signatures Collected : 404 Written Signatures Collected : 292 Total Signatures Collected : 696 I 2008-3155 t Stop 0 Street Published by Judy Firestien on Sep 04, 2008 Petition History and Background: • The noise and pollution caused by the construction and use of the O Street extension and alignment will severely impact the ecosystem of the Cache la Poudre River riparian corridor. American Rivers has already declared the Cache la Poudre River America?s third most Endangered River. The highway will negatively impact the Cache la Poudre National Heritage Area and the Poudre River Trail Corridor. The Colorado Department of Wildlife opposes the O Street Alignment. There is an abundance of wildlife in this last stretch of undeveloped riparian corridor. Construction of this highway will cause wildlife and recreation areas to be destroyed and open space opportunities to be lost. Homes and farmland will be demolished and rural character and heritage lost. Petition Text: To Weld County Commissioners and representatives and officials of the City of Greeley, Town of Windsor, County of Weld, and State of Colorado: We, the undersigned residents of Northern Colorado, are deeply concerned about the plan for the extension and alignment of O Street(County Road 64) between Weld County Road 27 and Weld County Road 23. We urge our representatives and public officials to: Consider other alternatives to the O Street extension such as improvement and widening of US Hwy 34 and State Hwy 392 and use of the existing Weld County Road 64.5. If an alternative for O Street must be approved, we urge our representatives and public officials to: Approve the blue alignment alternative which travels south of the intersection of O Street and 83rd Avenue. (The blue alignment would be less destructive than the currently preferred yellow alternative which travels straight through the intersection and destroys two homes and the associated farm buildings. Alignment alternative information provided per the study completed by Felsburg, Holt and Ullevig.) Total signatures 349(Signature comments can be viewed in the Appendix of this document) # FirstName Surname Town/City S/C/P Comment Date 349 Laura Sales Greeley Colorado View Nov 17,2008 348 Gerald Unrein Greeley CO N/G Nov 16,2008 347 Kathleen Unrein Greeley CO N/G Nov 16,2008 346 Marvin Wirth Greeley CO View Nov 16,2008 345 Dannie Sinele Greeley Colorado N/G Nov 16,2008 344 Susan Sinele Greeley Colorado View Nov 16,2008 343 shelley gotchey Greeley Colorado View Nov 16,2008 342 Cathy Insley Greeley CO N/G Nov 16,2008 341 Amber Johnson Greeley CO View Nov 16,2008 340 LouAnn Hergert Greeley CO N/G Nov 16,2008 339 Lauren Hergert Greeley CO N/G Nov 16,2008 338 Torn Hart Greeley Colorado View Nov 16,2008 PETITION:Stop O Street Page 1 Powered by GOPen,on # FirstName Surname Town/City S/C/P Comment Date 337 Regan Romero Greeley Colorado N/G Nov 15,2008 Weld 336 Michael Dillon Windsor Colorado N/G Nov 15,2008 335 Curtis Rickert Windsor CO N/G Nov 14,2008 334 Judy Stevens Greeley Colorado N/G Nov 14,2008 Weld 333 Linda Langewisch Parker Co N/G Nov 14,2008 332 Katherine Rickert Windsor CO View Nov 14,2008 331 MICK MOORE ATWOOD KS N/G Nov 14,2008 330 scott Langewisch Parker co N/G Nov 14,2008 329 Virgil Taylor Gill CO View Nov 14,2008 328 Pam Young Lone Tree CO View Nov 14,2008 327 Burton Dines Tabernash CO N/G Nov 14,2008 326 Lily Dines Tabernash CO N/G Nov 14,2008 325 Darren Dines Tabernash CO N/G Nov 14,2008 324 Leslie Dines Tabernash CO N/G Nov 14,2008 323 Akashah Adamson Greeley Colorado N/G Nov 13,2008 322 Christine Curl Keenesburg CO N/G Nov 13,2008 321 Tyler Beckle Greeley Colorado N/G Nov 13,2008 320 Lori Reeves eaton co N/G Nov 13,2008 319 Rodney Cole Keenesburg CO N/G Nov 13,2008 318 Susan Cole Keenesburg CO N/G Nov 13,2008 317 Ri delRio Greeley Co View Nov 13,2008 316 Jamie Hoover Greeley Co N/G Nov 13,2008 315 Jammy Pyeatt Greeley Colorado,weld N/G Nov 13,2008 314 Marie Hauer Lone Tree CO N/G Nov 13,2008 313 Susie Hoodecheck Lone Tree CO N/G Nov 13,2008 312 Garland Aberegg Weld County Colorado View Nov 13,2008 311 Vince Grimes eaton co. View Nov 13,2008 310 Lourdes valdez greeley colorado N/G Nov 13,2008 309 Allison Berry Pierce CO N/G Nov 13,2008 308 Jennifer Daniels Greeley Colorado View Nov 13,2008 307 Kimberly Browning Englewood CO View Nov 13,2008 306 Maureen Meegan Denver CO N/G Nov 13,2008 305 Doug Jenkins Castle Rock CO N/G Nov 13,2008 304 Lisa Goodrich Boulder CO View Nov 13,2008 303 Martha Cowley Erie CO View Nov 13,2008 302 Jodi Courson Thornton CO View Nov 13,2008 301 Kristi Burgert Denver CO N/G Nov 13,2008 300 Robin Brilz Aurora CO View Nov 13,2008 299 Daniel Block greeley colorado N/G Nov 13,2008 298 Denise Block greeley colorado N/G Nov 13,2008 297 Johnny Castellano Centennial CO View Nov 13,2008 296 Ann Conroy Englewood CO N/G Nov 13,2008 295 Raul Olives Windsor CO View Nov 13,2008 294 Joshua Ortiz Denver CO View Nov 13,2008 293 Shernetla Vaughn Denver CO N/G Nov 13,2008 292 janice Gaskin denver co N/G Nov 13,2008 291 Erika Gaskin denver co N/G Nov 13,2008 290 Elizabeth Katein Fort.Collins Colorado View Nov 12,2008 289 Anna Leyva Aurora Co N/G Nov 12,2008 268 Michelle White Longmont Co View Nov 12,2008 PETITION:Stop O Street Page 2 Poweredcyy P! „ # firstName Surname Town/City S/C/P Comment Date 287 Lupe Barraza Fort Collins Colorado View Nov 12,2008 286 Scott Rundquist Aurora Co N/G Nov 12,2008 285 Jeff Sebeckis Denver CO View Nov 12,2008 284 Amanda Whipple Denver Colorado N/G Nov 12,2008 283 Leslie Cary Greeley Co N/G Nov 12,2008 282 Ashley Pyeatt Greeley CO,Weld N/G Nov 12,2008 281 rocio escalante henderson colorado N/G Nov 12,2008 280 Kelly Silverthome Edgewater CO View Nov 12,2008 279 Dominick mattie III denver colorado N/G Nov 12,2008 278 Christian Eaton Boulder CO N/G Nov 12,2008 277 Jeff Davis Greeley Co View Nov 12,2008 276 James Roland Denver CO N/G Nov 12,2008 275 Scottie Chen Centennial Colorado N/G Nov 12,2008 274 Lori Hoffner Greeley CO View Nov 12,2008 273 Christy Knutson Windsor Colorado N/G Nov 12,2008 272 Elaine Hoff Greeley CO View Nov 11,2008 271 Karen Lock Windsor CO N/G Nov 10,2008 270 Dewayne and Ruby Dill Greeley Co. View Nov 08,2008 269 Grace Euresti Greeley Colorado N/G Nov 07,2008 268 Adelina Lopez Evans CO View Nov 06,2008 267 Virginia Lightsey-Ceehorne Greeley CO View Nov 06,2008 266 erich hoffmann windsor colorado N/G Nov 05,2008 265 Michele Geisick Wiggins CO N/G Nov 04,2008 264 Patrick Pyfrom Eaton Colorado View Nov 04,2008 263 CJ Butner Ft Collins CO N/G Nov 04,2008 262 Kari Romanoski Windsor Co N/G Nov 04,2008 261 Rex Rhoads Greeley CO N/G Nov 03,2008 260 Leslie Lang Greeley Colorado N/G Nov 03,2008 259 Brian Weber Grreley CO N/G Nov 02,2008 258 Kathleen Hettinger Ault Colo N/G Nov 02,2008 257 Kevin Hettinger Ault CO N/G Nov 02,2008 256 Brad Budner Greeley CO N/G Oct 31,2008 255 Alicia Budner Greeley CO N/G Oct 31,2008 254 Jennifer Diaz Windsor Weld N/G Oct 30,2008 253 Daniel Peck Greeley Co. N/G Oct 29,2008 252 Vivien Peck Greeley CO N/G Oct 29,2008 251 JACK MAYFIELD GREELEY COLORADO View Oct 29,2008 250 Vicky Citrino Greeley Co N/G Oct 28,2008 249 Paulette Ott Evans Co View Oct 28,2008 248 Ann Lacefield Greeley Colorado N/G Oct 27,2008 247 Micheal Smith Greeley CO View Oct 27,2008 246 Erik Truchses Greeley Co View Oct 27,2008 245 Harold Buxman Greeley Co. N/G Oct 27,2008 244 Clint Harris Greeley CO,Weld View Oct 27,2008 County 243 Efrem Pisano Greeley Colorado, View Oct 26,2008 Weld County 242 Angie Friehauf Bellvue Co N/G Oct 26,2008 241 john pascal 2110 39 th ave greeley co N/G Oct 25,2008 240 Mary V Woodward Greeley CO View Oct 25,2008 239 Bradley Olson Greeley CO View Oct 25,2008 238 Harold Long Greeley CO N/G Oct 25,2008 PETITION:Stop O Street Page 3 powered by QyBytto' tt FirstName Surname Town/City S/C/P Comment Date 237 Carol Long Greeley CO N/G Oct 25,2008 236 Wade,Mark,Dean. Firestien Greeley Colorado View Oct 25,2008 235 Linda Meintzer Evans Co View Oct 24,2008 234 Jacob Hergenreder Greeley Colo. View Oct 24,2008 233 Laura Hiebenthal Greeley CO N/G Oct 24,2008 232 James Rupp Greeley Colorado N/G Oct 24,2008 231 ray and sheryl hardesty eaton co N/G Oct 24,2008 230 Delila Margaret Peterson Greeley Colorado View Oct 24,2008 229 Albert L. Peterson Greeley Colorado View Oct 24,2008 228 tarry granlund greeley colorado N/G Oct 24,2008 227 Diana Hoff Fest Severance Colorado View Oct 24,2008 226 Jenny Straight Windsor CO N/G Oct 24,2008 225 Sherri Zuhlke Greeley CO View Oct 24,2008 224 Kay Albert Eaton CO View Oct 24,2008 223 Rebecca Buller Evans CO N/G Oct 23,2008 222 Kelly Anderson Greeley Colorado N/G Oct 23,2008 221 Slade Davis Greeley Colorado N/G Oct 23,2008 220 Brittany Dees Windsor Colorado N/G Oct 23,2008 219 Sheri Dalgliesh Evans Colorado N/G Oct 22,2008 218 Amy Ogden Greeley CO N/G Oct 21,2008 217 Matthew Mondragon greeley colorado N/G Oct 21,2008 216 Cynthia Moore Johnstown CO N/G Oct 21,2008 215 sarah byrne Greeley Co View Oct 20,2008 214 April Martzall Greeley Colorado N/G Oct 20,2008 213 stacy maddera greeley co N/G Oct 20,2008 212 Kyle Atchley Greeley CO N/G Oct 18,2008 211 Michelle McDermott Greeley CO View Oct 18,2008 210 Mary kay Pascal greeley co N/G Oct 17,2008 209 Cindy Nichols Greeley Colorado N/G Oct 16,2008 208 Mark Nichols Greeley Colorado N/G Oct 16,2008 207 Heather Patrick Greeley Colorado N/G Oct 16,2008 206 Ashlee Dieck Greeley Colorado N/G Oct 16,2008 205 Judy Dieck Greeley Colorado N/G Oct 16,2008 204 Bert Dieck Greeley Colorado N/G Oct 16,2008 203 Trevor Dieck Greeley Colorado N/G Oct 16,2008 202 Betty Warren Greeley Colorado N/G Oct 16,2008 201 Jesse Reese Greeley Colorado N/G Oct 16,2008 200 Alyssa Scritchteld Windsor CO N/G Oct 16,2008 199 Nadine KLER Greeley weld,co. N/G Oct 15,2008 198 JULIAN KLER Greeley weld,co. N/G Oct 15,2008 197 mary goheen greeley co View Oct 13,2008 196 Emily McDonald Greeley Co View Oct 13,2008 195 Denise Hunteman-Baker Greeley Co N/G Oct 12,2008 194 Casey Johnson Greeley CO N/G Oct 12,2008 193 Albert Figueroa Akron Colorado N/G Oct 12,2008 192 Dean Thompson Greeley CO. N/G Oct 12,2008 191 Chrissy Jack Greeley CO N/G Oct 10,2008 190 Rick Warehime Greeley CO View Oct 10,2008 189 Harry Bruntz Greeley CO View Oct 10,2008 188 Kathy Moore Denver CO N/G Oct 10,2008 187 Robert Lindschmidt Greeley Colorado N/G Oct 10,2008 186 Joe and Dale Bisceglia Windsor Colorado N/G Oct 09,2008 PETITION:Stop O Street Page 4 Po,.re,bd ey 6bPeWon # FirstName Surname Town/City S/C/P Comment Date 185 Lara Wiley Greeley Colorado N/G Oct 09,2008 184 HOWARD KLINGER GREELEY CO N/G Oct 09,2008 183 Sarah Wood Greeley CO N/G Oct 09,2008 182 Chris Repka Greeley Colorado N/G Oct 07,2008 181 Donald Luther Greeley Co. N/G Oct 07,2008 180 Pamela Luther Greeley Co. N/G Oct 07,2008 179 Kristi Ensz Greeley CO N/G Oct 04,2008 178 Robert Cantrell Kersey CO N/G Oct 04,2008 177 Dawn Mayer Ft.Collins Colorado N/G Oct 04,2008 176 Ty Calkins Greeley CO N/G Oct 04,2008 175 Cori Layton Greeley Colorado N/G Oct 03,2008 174 Maria Gutierrez Greeley, CO USA N/G Oct 02,2008 173 Dennis Brunner Greeley Colorado View Oct 02,2008 172 Christopher Brunner Greeley Colorado N/G Oct 02,2008 171 Darrell Brunner Greeley Colorado View Oct 02,2008 170 Teresa Brunner Greeley Colorado View Oct 02,2008 169 Jamie Elder Centennial CO View Oct 01,2008 168 Dennis Steele Greeley CO N/G Sep 30,2008 167 Kate Hamilton Greeley Co View Sep 29,2008 166 Rob Davis Mead CO N/G Sep 28,2008 165 Kevin Kulp Greeley Colorado View Sep 28,2008 164 Julia Michels Windsor CO View Sep 26,2008 163 Lee Johnson Greeley CO View Sep 26,2008 162 Shannon Kammerer Fort Collins CO N/G Sep 25,2008 161 rene oya Greeley CO N/G Sep 25,2008 160 Andrea Vitullo Greeley CO,Weld View Sep 25,2008 159 Joyce Flot Greeley CO View Sep 24,2008 158 Luis Cantarero Fort Collins CO View Sep 24,2008 157 ken suffer greeley co N/G Sep 24,2008 156 Emily Tatar Windsor CO N/G Sep 24,2008 155 Brad Snow Greeley Co. View Sep 24,2008 154 Kevin Tanner Castle Rock Colorado N/G Sep 23,2008 153 George Magnuson Northglenn Colorado N/G Sep 23,2008 152 Shirley Magnuson Northglenn Colorado N/G Sep 23,2008 151 Todd Magnuson Thornton Colorado N/G Sep 23,2008 150 Scott Magnuson Brighton Colorado N/G Sep 23,2008 149 Paula Magnuson Farmington New Mexico N/G Sep 23,2008 148 Paul Magnuson Farmington New Mexico N/G Sep 23,2008 147 Leslie Tanner Castle Rock Colorado N/G Sep 22,2008 146 MIKE KELLY GREELEY CO N/G Sep 22,2008 145 JOAN KELLY GREELEY CO N/G Sep 22,2008 144 Steve Hall Centennial Colorado View Sep 21,2008 143 Karen Omeg Severance Colorado View Sep 21,2008 142 Gordon Omeg Severance Colorado View Sep 21,2008 141 Candie Joshi Windsor CO View Sep 21,2008 140 Corey Muhr Greeley Colorado N/G Sep 20,2008 139 jessica craven greeley co N/G Sep 19,2008 138 Kathy Schraeder Greeley Co View Sep 19,2008 137 Kenneth Schraeder Greeley Colorado N/G Sep 19,2008 136 megan duperreault fort collins co N/G Sep 19,2008 135 Steve Niccolai Greeley CO N/G Sep 19,2008 134 Thomas Sas Greeley CO View Sep 19,2008 PETITION-.Stop O Street Page 5 Powered by GoPetit.. # FirstName Surname Town/City S/C/P Comment Date 133 Ann Richardson Greeley CO N/G Sep 19,2008 132 James Thomason Greeley CO N/G Sep 19,2008 131 Nancy Harris Greeley Colorado N/G Sep 19,2008 130 Cheryl Stimson Littleton CO N/G Sep 19,2008 129 Tyree Schraeder Greeley Colorado N/G Sep 18,2008 128 Helen Ruth Greeley Co N/G Sep 18,2008 127 Nicole Knuppel Greeley Colorado View Sep 17,2008 126 David Arellano Greeley Colorado N/G Sep 17,2008 125 Helen Lohnes Greeley CO N/G Sep 17,2008 124 Joyce Tooley Greeley Co. N/G Sep 17,2008 123 George Tooley Greeley Co. N/G Sep 17,2008 122 Michael Amatrone Greeley CO N/G Sep 17,2008 121 Cynthia Quick Greeley CO View Sep 17,2008 120 Joseph Harpring Greeley CO View Sep 17,2008 119 Peter Hodges Sedalia CO View Sep 17,2008 118 MARK STANFIELD GREELEY CO View Sep 16,2008 117 meghan stiles Greeley CO View Sep 16,2008 116 Robert &Marilyn Sitzman Nekoosa WI N/G Sep 16,2008 115 Thomas Clark Greeley Colorado N/G Sep 16,2008 114 Cynthia Purcelley Windsor CO N/G Sep 16,2008 113 Laurie Reinke Greeley CO N/G Sep 15,2008 112 Doreen Warrender Evans CO N/G Sep 15,2008 111 Joleita Felte Windsor CO N/G Sep 15,2008 110 Harold Felte Windsor CO N/G Sep 15,2008 109 Julie Stout Severance CO N/G Sep 15,2008 108 Susan Granlund Windsor CO N/G Sep 15,2008 107 James Sewald Greeley CO,Weld N/G Sep 15,2008 106 Michael Lowell Loveland Colorado N/G Sep 15,2008 105 Karen Gullickson Greeley CO View Sep 15,2008 104 Karen Morehead Erie CO View Sep 14,2008 103 Zach Marshall Ault CO N/G Sep 14,2008 102 Cindy Fireslien Windsor CO N/G Sep 14,2008 101 Gene Fireslien Windsor CO N/G Sep 14,2008 100 Renea Johnson Wellington CO N/G Sep 14,2008 99 Terry Johnson Wellington CO N/G Sep 14,2008 98 Joann Firestien Ault CO N/G Sep 14,2008 97 George Firestien Ault CO N/G Sep 14,2008 96 Bob Zuellig Fort Collins Colorado N/G Sep 14,2008 95 Deborah Margos Erie Colorado N/G Sep 14,2008 Weld 94 David Margos Erie Colorado N/G Sep 14,2008 Weld 93 Prabodh Joshi windsor co View Sep 14,2008 92 Robert Papish Fort Collins Colorado View Sep 14,2008 91 todd valencia highlands ranch Colorado N/G Sep 14,2008 90 Barbara Carbaugh Windsor CO N/G Sep 14,2008 89 Dana Heiny Evans CO View Sep 14,2008 88 Everett Foos Greeley CO N/G Sep 14,2008 87 Steve Frye Greeley Co View Sep 14,2008 86 Pamela Frye Greeley Co View Sep 14,2008 85 valerie olson greeley co N/G Sep 14,2008 84 David Frye Greeley Co View Sep 14,2008 PETITION:Stop O Street Page 6 powered by GoPewloo # - FirstName Surname Town/City S/C/P Comment Date 83 Megan Wommack Greeley CO N/G Sep 14,2008 82 Juanita Lohnes Greeley CO View Sep 14,2008 81 Mark Savedra greeley co View Sep 13,2008 80 bernice daniel johnstown co,weld co N/G Sep 13,2008 79 Josette Schaffer Greeley CO N/G Sep 13,2008 78 Vera Foos Greeley CO N/G Sep 13,2008 77 Denise Wiedeman Eaton CO N/G Sep 13,2008 76 Robed Swanson Greeley CO N/G Sep 13,2008 75 Jennifer Hettinger Windsor CO View Sep 13,2008 74 Judy Firestien Greeley CO View Sep 13,2008 73 Dana Laratta Littleton CO N/G Sep 13,2008 72 Jane Millwe Eaton CO View Sep 13,2008 71 Kristy John Ault CO View Sep 13,2008 70 Erica Cooper Windsor CO N/G Sep 13,2008 69 Rhonda Young Windsor Colorado N/G Sep 13,2008 68 Margaret E Moody Eaton CO N/G Sep 13,2008 67 Roger Ulane Loveland CO View Sep 13,2008 66 Brad Smith Aledo Texas N/G Sep 13,2008 65 Trade Serrato surprise az N/G Sep 12,2008 64 Stephen Serrato surprise az N/G Sep 12,2008 63 Lori Zimmer Eaton CO View Sep 12,2008 62 Nicole Vieira Fort Collins CO View Sep 12,2008 61 Jhenna Schauermann Greeley CO N/G Sep 12,2008 60 Diana Blevins Greeley Colorado N/G Sep 12,2008 59 Kendall Read Centennial CO N/G Sep 12,2008 58 Bruce Morehead Erie CO View Sep 12,2008 57 Fred Keubler Washington Utah View Sep 12,2008 56 Mark Vieira Fort Collins Colorado N/G Sep 12,2008 55 jamie sturgess centennial colorado View Sep 12,2008 54 Calvin Ikenouye Windsor CI View Sep 12,2008 53 Cheryl MaRTIN Evans CO N/G Sep 12,2008 52 Christian Site Colorado Springs Co View Sep 12,2008 51 Alphretta Erdmann Briggsdale CO View Sep 12,2008 50 Michelle Podtburg Windsor CO View Sep 12,2008 49 Jason Cummings Wellington Colorado N/G Sep 11,2008 48 William Davis Breckenridge Colorado View Sep 11,2008 47 Anne Davis Mead CO N/G Sep 11,2008 46 Fred Newcomer Breckenridge CO N/G Sep 11,2008 45 Dan Simpson Wheat Ridge Colorado N/G Sep 11,2008 44 Ken Podtburg Greeley, co View Sep 11,2008 43 Adam Macy Timnath CO View Sep 11,2008 42 Robert Triplett Denver Co. View Sep 11,2008 41 Scott Speidel Loveland CO,Larimer N/G Sep 11,2008 40 Richard Enns Fort Collins CO N/G Sep 11,2008 39 Judy Pabst greeley CO N/G Sep 11,2008 38 Cynde Dupre Windsor CO N/G Sep 10,2008 37 Michael Valdez Windsor CO N/G Sep 10,2008 36 Brett Valette Superior Colorado N/G Sep 10,2008 35 Allen Shaw Denver CO View Sep 10,2008 34 Patrick Laing FORT COLLINS CO N/G Sep 10,2008 33 TAD STOUT Severance COLORADO N/G Sep 10,2008 32 Albert Allison Greeley CO View Sep 10,2008 PETITION:Stop 0 Street Page 7 Powered by GOPeeylan # FirstName Surname Town/City S/C/P Comment Date 31 Vincent Snyder Greeley Co N/G Sep 10,2008 30 Barbara Snyder Greeley Co View Sep 10,2008 29 Stefanie Autrey Longmont CO View Sep 10,2008 28 Robert Kali Fort Collins CO N/G Sep 10,2008 27 Regina Oswald Fort Collins CO N/G Sep 10,2008 26 Wendy Kruger Fort Collins Colorado, View Sep 10,2008 Weld 25 charleen schaeffer windsor colorado N/G Sep 10,2008 24 Vickie Stimac Windsor CO N/G Sep 10,2008 23 PHYLLIS DERR PIERCE COLORADO N/G Sep 10,2008 22 Justin Buxman greeley co N/G Sep 09,2008 21 Jaimie Bean Windsor CO N/G Sep 09,2008 20 Sandy Brug Windsor CO View Sep 09,2008 19 Kathy White Eaton CO View Sep 09,2008 18 Lee Meek Windsor Co. N/G Sep 09,2008 17 George Siglinger Greeley Colorado N/G Sep 08,2008 16 jeremy brinkman greeley colorado View Sep 08,2008 15 Peggy Cowan Loveland Colorado View Sep 08,2008 14 Brenda&Gary Marshall Windsor Colorado N/G Sep 08,2008 13 Lisa Loos Greeley CO View Sep 08,2008 12 Harley Lowe Greeley Colorado N/G Sep 08,2008 11 Linda Law Greeley Colorado N/G Sep 08,2008 10 Jerry&Dorothy Firestien Greeley Colorado N/G Sep 08,2008 9 Steve Heinike Greeley Colorado View Sep 08,2008 8 Toni Riemer Greeley CO N/G Sep 08,2008 7 tern Keeney Greeley CO N/G Sep 07,2008 6 Kristin Kurz Greeley Colorado N/G Sep 06,2008 5 Weston Kurz Greeley co View Sep 06,2008 4 marilyn weinmeister greeley co N/G Sep 06,2008 3 kent erb severance co N/G Sep 06,2008 2 Ruth Firestien Greeley CO View Sep 04,2008 1 Roger Firestien Williamsville New York View Sep 04,2008 ti N/C-field not collected by the author N/G-not given by the signer S/C/P-State,County or Province 'View-view comment . PETITION:Stop O Street Page a Powered by S s.P Appendix: All signatures comments 349 Back to signature list Are you people crazy? Why are you spending my tax dollars to create a quicker route to shopping in McWhinneyland? After all the work that was done by the wonderful people on the PoudreTrail Committee you want to build a 4 lane road alone it!!!! 346 Back to signature list There are other alternatives that are less harmful to the neighborhood. Tjhe historicak significance shoud not be overlooked. 344 Back to signature list I can't understand why this road is necessary at all.There can't possibly be enough people using the road to justify its cost at this time or in the near future. 343 Back to signature list The road is not progress- it's a destruction of diversity and the beauty of our countryside. 341 Back to signature list I absolutely, 100%support the Firesteins in their efforts to stop the building of a needless road. This is their family home, their history and heritage.We as a community should protect this at all costs. The last thing Weld county needs is another road, destroying nature and wildlife. Shame on you,Weld County Commissioners, and any other govt. agency trying to destroy the Firesteins home. It is utter nonsense! STop O street! Listen to the people for a change!! 338 Back to signature list The Poudre River corridor is a valuable asset to citizens of Northern Colorado and is the only local outdoor recreation area we have that is assessable without driving to the mountains .The trail and open space offer a get-away from the urbanization that is rapidly removing our connection to the outdoors. I feel that preservation of its natural resources, wildlife and open space far exceeds the need for another roadway. Please support the use of exixting roadways and the landowners property 332 Back to signature list Weld Counties economic base is agriculture and we should do everything to strengthen it. O street extension would cut through productive agriculture and limited natural resources making what exists non-reclaimable in the future-a signficant wasteful impact. 329 Back to signature list My wife and I appreciate what you are going through. We are in the path of the super slab and it has surely reduced our property value. Good luck. 328 Back to signature list This is completely uncalled for since there is a perfectly acceptable alternative. PETITION:Stop 0 Street Page 9 Powered by GOPeuA4„ 317 Back to signature list Let them keep their homes you arrogant SNOTS!!!! 312 Back to signature list In this day and age, with our current economy and very uncertain future, it is not a good use of our resources to waist them on what is not critical. 311 Back to signature list do not need any more long wide loads on secondary roads. can not get roads around my home repaired or properly engineered. 308 Back to signature list I do wish you luck in the quest of keeping your home. God Bless you and your family. 307 Back to signature list If there is an alternative to disrupting someones home, history and property then it should be taken. In this case there is an alternative. Shame on you for taking away something from someone else. Find another way. 304 Back to signature list Thanks! 303 Back to signature list Given world shortages in asphalt,the sensitive and valuable nature of the land in question, it seems the only valid option is to use our existing infrastructure by expanding it to the capacity needed.Another road will not solve the inadequacy of the existing infrastructure. However another road could destroy what can never be replaced. 302 Back to signature list Best wishes to this family. My husband and I saw this on FOX 31 news. It means a lot to keep things in the family. 300 Back to signature list There is NO reason the that county, City of Greeley and the Town of Windsor can NOT use the alternative route; this is wrong. The Southern Alternate Route would be just as benificial!Without BIG GOVERNMENT trying to take over. 297 Back to signature list Have some campassion. Use the alternative route and don't destroy peoples past, present and future. 295 Back to signature list Leave the houses alone!!! Make due with what you got and leave the poudre alone!!! 294 Back to signature list PETITION:Stop O Street Page 10 Powered by G.Pe,mon Sounds like a corrupt politic. 290 Back to signature list The city does NOT have the right to take someones house and memories away for ANOTHER road.You can never replace what was made in that house, or the people who grew up there. I support the family! Greely can find a different route.That's the last thing we need is more roads and people losing their homes. FIND A NEW ROUTE!You've done it before, and you can do it again! 288 Back to signature list Too much farm land and rural land is being taken for'growth.' Government needs to think of the little person and not what is easier for them. This is the lives and memories of people... our people...Colorado people! The Government needs to do the right thing, which is to NOT destroy these homes and lives. These people and their families have paid their taxes...why shouldn't their money fight for them and not just line the pockets of the city and county officials? 287 Back to signature list Another example of how the city and the counties think they can take whatever they want.To them,it's just a house,to you,it's your life,memories and family.l'd like to say"Hell no to 0!!" Good luck and God Bless 285 Back to signature list After reviewing the information here and on the news, I don't believe that imminent domain is just in this case. Make the main road angle around. Perhaps a look into making this house and property a national historic monument should also be reviewed before a judgement is passed. 280 Back to signature list Thoughts and prayers are with you. I think it is horrible when local governments can't plan for better alternatives!! It seems ridiculous that they can just take away land and destroy homes in the name of growth. Best of luck to you and your family! 277 Back to signature list It's not right 274 Back to signature list The southern route is much preferred. The road would still be built and the Firesteins' houses would be left alone. 272 Back to signature list Please listen to your constituents regarding this matter. 270 Back to signature list There is no reason for spending money to put a road there, because its not a busy road, we have other roads close by to use. It is a waste of peoples homes and land and money. There has to be something there for someones personal gain. I say NO to the road. 268 Back to signature list PETITION Stop O Street Page 11 Powered by GoPebton People have the right to keep there homes. 267 Back to signature list There are plenty of other options for traffic. To extend O street through these existing homes is not needed and would be morally irresponsible. 264 Back to signature list I strongly suggest routing O street not to destroy these houses. 251 Back to signature list INSTEAD OF WASTING MONEY ON A STUDY TO BUILD ANOTHER ROAD, WHICH IS GOING TO DESTROY SOMEONES PROPERTY , THAT MONEY WOULD BE BETTER USED TO IMPROVE AND MAINTAIN OUR EXISTING NET WORK OF ROADS. WHY NOT IMPROVE AND WIDEN HWY 257 NORTH FROM HWY 34. THERE ARE A LOT FEWER HOMES ALONG THAT ROUTE. TO ME IT JUST SEEMS LIKE ANOTHER WASTE OF TAX PAYERS MONEY THAT COULD BE PUT TO BETTER USE. 249 Back to signature list Do not destroy peoples long standing homes when there are alternatives. 247 Back to signature list 64.5 is only about a half mile north and it doesn't make sense to build another road parallel to it. and 34 and 392 aren't that far away either.There is definately not a strong enough need here to justify taking private property. 246 Back to signature list Expand 392 instead 244 Back to signature list Just what we need, more development when other roads and areas are seriously neglected. No thank you. 243 Back to signature list This is wrong they refused to sell. So you can't do this to their property.They have a wonderful house and a good farm. They live their. I would understand if it was just fields but this is a house with people who live in it. Please don't tear down their house. Please just don't. 240 Back to signature list Alternatives to the proposal need to be carefully considered. If 392 and 34 are insufficient for existing and anticipated traffic needs, improving either and/or both highways is preferable to carving a new thoroughfare. The commissioners need to present a more powerful argument than, eg, "a faster route to Centerra ," before displacing current private property owners. 239 Back to signature list Take care of the existing roads. The links to 125 are enough for the Greeley area. I sense that someone is thinking on making money on the deal. PETITION:Stop 0 Street Page 12 Powered by GoaeLlon 236 Back to signature list These homes have been in our family for many years. Was our grandfathers home and our dads home. They do not need to be taken away for a road. This would be so sad for our family's. 235 Back to signature list This area does not need expansion.This area needs preserved. Just stop! 234 Back to signature list We don't need to have our tax dollers wasted on a road we don't need.Displaceing people that have lived in the area for decades doesn,t make any sense. 230 Back to signature list Build 47 Avenue all the way through!!! Y29 Back to signature list If you need to build a raod, how about finishing 47th Avenue through Arrowhead. That is REALLY needed. 227 Back to signature list Any alternative is better than tearing two families out of their homes. I would rather it stay as it is and let those who want to drive 55-65 mph use 392 or 34.Why do we always have to destroy farmlands and wildlife habitats for our own convenience . .just so we can get somewhere faster? Let us keep some of the tranquility of living in and around farmlands and driving those cool curvy roads.They are disappearing fast enough as it is! 225 Back to signature list Let them keep their homes! 224 Back to signature list This is not needed, HWY 34 and 392 are with in a few miles. 215 Back to signature list Government needs to understand that taking a man's land is unamerican and a slap in the face to the hard workers of this country. Approach landowners that are willing to sell to expand the roadway, even if it means added roadway. Using a heavy hand to get what government thinks is for the"greater good", is not right. Have a conscience. 211 Back to signature list Not necessary! 197 Back to signature list Please do not tear down this family's homes. please try to go around the property. 196 Back to signature list PETITION:Stop O Street Page 13 Powered by QOE'ee,lon An uncalled for route that is invasive and thievery to give"Fair Market Value"for ANY house at this time 190 Back to signature list No need for a new 4 lane highway so close to the other one.A waste of tax payers money!!! 189 Back to signature list Ridiculous!The county needs to take care of the current roads instead of building new ones.There is a new 4 lane on 83rd Ave which is only 2 miles away!!! Stop wasting tax payers money!! 173 Back to signature list As a US Marine, I've commited myself to the protection of the average citizen, I am not interested in supporting a wealthy developer at the expense of someone's three generation home. Pelican Lakes doesn't need their own road! 171 Back to signature list Puffing Weld County Road 66 through would make a lot more sense than "O" Street. Only one mile needs built, three miles need paved, and it actually goes into a Town instead of a residential area. 170 Back to signature list I don't know why you are building a road that goes nowhere, and considering tearing down peoples homes to do it. 169 Back to signature list Please find an alternative route! 167 Back to signature list the destrution of two homes for the extention of a road is a thoughtless and cruel attack on the livelyhood of the families that live in those homes in a time when our homes and land are all we have that is real and secure. 165 Back to signature list The homeowner has the rights to the property. If the government wants the property, it is free to make an offer. This country is a capitalist country, not Socialist. That is why we are the most powerful. 164 Back to signature list It is absolutely unneccessary to continue this road through these farms!! There is already an existing road that winds around them, which is done is several other towns in this area. Furthermore, nobody wants the peace and quiet of the Poudre River Trail to be loud, smelly, and congested by a road right next to it. Do not use eminent domain for a bad policy!! 163 Back to signature list There isn't enough traffic on O St continuing west into Windsor to warrant a 4 lane highway. US34 bypass is 4 lanes, US34 business route(10th St)and CO392 will soon be 4 lanes. These major road systems are enough to handle current and future vehicle traffic. These government entities can&rsquost manage their current road system. If Weld County, City’s of Greeley and Windsor have so much money for this silly project, then add bike lanes the entire length for the safety of cyclists and motorists. PETITION:Stop O Street Page 14 Powered by cl}Pewioo 160 Back to signature list I am appalled that the city would consider destroying these peoples home&property for convenience sake! STOP 0 Street. 159 Back to signature list Why do we always have to destroy establised residence to build streets. roads, etc. What do you plan on doing with the gravel pit just west of the homes. Think again. There is already an existing road. Fix it up, straighten out the curves a little. Be practical. 158 Back to signature list I urge the commisioners to take an approach that studies wide alternatives and preserves the rural flavor that makes Colorado a jewel among these United States of America. 155 Back to signature list A flashing red light would save a lot of our money,homes,land,wildlife,traffic etc. 144 Back to signature list I have hunted and fished on the Stout's property for the past 6 years and have found it to be one of the best wildlife habitat developments in Northern Colorado. They have spent many long hours and considerable amount of money developing the property for wildlife and fisheries. I truly would hate to see it destroyed just to put in another highway. There are alternatives and I urge you take them and leave this property as is. Steve Hall 143 Back to signature list I do not see any meed for this proposed extension. 142 Back to signature list I do not see any need for this proposed extension. 141 Back to signature list There is an alternative available to preserve these people's historic homes and some of Colorado's beautiful natural habitat. This shouldn't be an issue! 138 Back to signature list I don't think at this time we should spend any money for a project under the economic conditions. I think the eco system should be left as is too. We just got the poudre river trail and it does not need the destruction of a highway! Since the Firestiens have lived on and at this farm for generations it should not be allowed to kick them out of their heritage home. 134 Back to signature list Why go directly thorugh these homes when there are acceptable alternatives! PETITION:Stop O Street Page 15 Powered by GoPell,ron 127 Back to signature list We only have so many places left like the Poudre River corridor left and we're planning on destroying it for what? A road that has several, much less disasterous alternatives. Stop this nonsense and stop O street. 121 Back to signature list Just continue to use the road 1/2 mile to the north and save the money for something much more important for the county. Don't abuse imminent domain in this case! 120 Back to signature list There are better routes that cause less disruption to private property. To the commissioners, please re-consider your motives and the alternatives. 119 Back to signature list Please choose to not destroy homes and property when you have another choice. Make us proud of our local government! 118 Back to signature list Leave well enough alone!!!! To the commissioners: How can you sleep at night? 117 Back to signature list please save the homes 105 Back to signature list Please--the Firesteins have given so much to the county and the community. Please save their homes. 104 Back to signature list This habitat is too important to destroy with a road! 93 Back to signature list please find a different way instead going through the houses. 92 Back to signature list I don't feel that O street should be allowed to go through this property, this family has been on this farm for many generations.There alot of different alternatives to diveriting this road rather than right down inbetween these two homes, Please preserve this family farm show some compassion for what Greeley is known for the family farm. Thank You, Bob Papish 89 Back to signature list It is wrong to destroy long-standing homes, farms, and wildlife preserves in order to maintain a straight line on a road when there are acceptable and supported alternatives. PETITION:Stop 0 Street Page 16 Powered by_G_oPe,l,ron 87 Back to signature list I thought Americans were known for leaving a better place for the next generation. I am finally old enough to appreciate the heritage and wildlife of the Poudre corridor and now I see attempts to destroy it.What am I supposed to tell my children when they ask what I did to make things better? PLEASE do not destroy what is left of this area. 86 Back to signature list Why did Greeley and Weld County waste time and money for a study when their minds were already made up?We were presented with flawed spreadsheets showing the chosen route to be the most cost effective.We were told that they"would get back with us"on anything that would have made their decision less atrtactive, which they never did. Our elected officials obviously have NO concern for those that they represent. This isn't about 2 little homes, it is about the American way of life. Vote NO 84 Back to signature list Please do not proceed with this expansion before you have a complete understanding. There were a number of SERIOUS concerns not addressed by the study, not the least of which is the negative national publicity sure to follow if the proposed (yellow)route is chosen 82 Back to signature list This is another time when the City and County has pushed ahead with their plans without considering the community. They plan on spending more money than necessary and push people out of their homes at the same time. I would like to know the real reason they insist on destorying these people lives and over spend taxs payers money. 81 Back to signature list This road is not nessassary, i drive by it everyday its only a waste of time and money. plus you can get where you need to go just take the roads that are already made. 75 Back to signature list I can't believe after all of the destruction near these communities this year, people would seriously try to ruin someone elses home and heritage! 74 Back to signature list One alternative is to leave things as they are. The Poudre Trail and Poudre Learning Center could be integrated more with this area, creating an open space community buffer and preserving the river corridor,wildlife habitat and rural character for future generations to enjoy. If you are going to create something for the public good, give the public a chance to enjoy open space rather than asphalt! Please preserve and protect this area rather than destroy it with a four lane highway! 72 Back to signature list There are better options than ruining the lives and property of the land owners 71 Back to signature list I sure think it's funny that the republicans advertise about eminent domain being a bad thing, but all the county commissioners are republicans. I think they're all a bunch of hypocrits. Save the farm! PETITION'.Stop O Street Page 17 Pave tl by GoPennon 67 Back to signature list Displacing people from their homes and destruction of wildlife areas is not justifiable for a new street. Respect the people who live there and the historical use of the land. There are plenty of good roads in the area and traffic certainly isn't a critical issue. 63 Back to signature list The government should respect the land owner's rights and not be a bully and just take what they want. Remember we vote in these people. If they don't do what we want, pay them back on election day. 62 Back to signature list This piece of property MUST NOT be intruded upon by this road. THere are other alternatives that will not destroy tons of riperian habitat, other wildlife refugia and HOMES/LIVES. 58 Back to signature list This property is a jewel of wildlife habitat that should not be destroyed. Please reconsider other alternatives to the destruction of these delicate and precious riparian areas. 57 Back to signature list I have watched the area of concern be developed into a Premier recreational spot for hunting and fishing. Your plan would destroy it. It's obvious you have no concern for those who live there and those who have given so much to society and made so much available to the community. 55 Back to signature list keep working toward consensus alternative routes that protect private property and protect habitat. 54 Back to signature list This proposal is unacceptable. There are many alternatives to be expolored that pose far less loss to this community. 52 Back to signature list Wildlife habitats are endangered epecially the migratory and resident bird populations that this area of the State is know for. 51 Back to signature list There is no reason to extend O street and destroy people's homes. The existing routes are more than enough. 50 Back to signature list There are other alternatives besides destroying the Firestien property. The heritage that their family farm displays fits nicely with the theme of the Poudre River/Trail/Schoolhouse, and can easily be chronicled for educational purposes. 48 Back to signature list I am opposed to this destruction of riparian environment and critical waterfowl flyway. I also oppose the proposed removal of private dwellings and an owners property rights. PETITION.Stop O Street Page 18 Powered by§QV oujrn 44 Back to signature list I am sure officials can curve the road around the houses. 43 Back to signature list Don't allow the road please. Spare the Poudre and all the people's lives that are affected. 42 Back to signature list The community's approved route is much more reasonable and preserves homes and valuable habitat. 35 Back to signature list I oppose the proposed routing 32 Back to signature list How can a route that causes so much personal property damage or loss be the best route and/or the cheapest? 30 Back to signature list This is very unfair to take this route through these homes when other options are available and acceptable. Why does this need to be changed anyway? I travel this road everyday and see no reason to change the street.The river is another thing that would be damaged by the change.Why disturb all of this and on top of it, take someone's estate that has been in their family for generations? I guarantee, no one that has presented this as an option would like this to happen to them. 29 Back to signature list I find it reprehensible that given alternate solutions that have been voted on already,the local government has taken it upon themselves to not only go against the communities decision, but to destroy someone's home as well as the environment. Government is supposed to be for the people, by the people....not for the government. 26 Back to signature list I can't believe the County and powers-that-be would sacrifice people's homes when the preferred route would SAVE them. 20 Back to signature list I would hope that the commissioners would respect private property rights and agree to either NOT extend street or agree to use a different route other than through the Firestien's houses. This is a ridiculous idea. Before you spend money on this sort of thing, FIX THE BAD ROADS THAT ARE ALREADY IN THE COUNTY. 19 Back to signature list The fact that these property owners and the citizens of Northern Colorado have to go to these lengths to save their properties is ridiculous. There are already alternative routes which will clearly disrupt fewer properties and minimize the harm to our ecosystem. Why would the cities choose the MOST harmful route for all? It is time that EVERYONE protect what little land we have left, instead of bulldozing ahead with little consideration to those that have helped to settle our county. STOP NOW PETITION'.Stop O Street Page 19 Powered by Gopeo,on 16 Back to signature list there should be lots of resonable options for this. stealing someone's property and destroying their homes is NOT a reasonable option. Shame on you greeley. 15 Back to signature list I was born and raised in Greeley, CO. I am saddened to see our agricultural history being destroyed by"progress"daily. It's time to preserve our history and stop the growth. It makes much more sense to widen highway 392 and west 10th street in Greeley. These roads are much more traveled, and extending 0 street only destroys the lives of the farmers, and our agricultural history. Please DO NOT extend 0 street! Thank you. 13 Back to signature list I have attended some of the meetings held for this proposal: I am concerned that the comments made by the people- truly effected by this proposal- are not being considered. Please contact every one that you can with your concerns- Judy and Ruth do not need to lose their homes. 9 Back to signature list As a resident of the area, I would like to know that the planning for expansion and improvements in the area are well thought through and balanced with regards to the impact to the residents,the environment, and the future requirements of the city and county. It appears that the planning board has taken the"easiest"solution with respect to the level of planning efforts at the expense of the individual property owners. 5 Back to signature list When the government has an opportunity to save a person's private property i.e. there are alternatives,then government should do so. This is such a case. 2 Back to signature list This has been my home for 56 years and I am very opposed to the 0 Street plan. It would destroy the Firestien home place, historic buildings, and property. 1 Back to signature list This will destroy a way of life for all people in it's path. I urge the county comissioners to re-consider this project. Please take a different approach! PETITION:Stop O Street Page 20 Powered by GoPe,ilion Stop the Widening of 0 Street Petition Published by Judy Firestien on Sep 10, 2008 Petition History and Background: Many home owners along O Street will be negatively impacted by the widening of O Street, causing some homes to be deemed uninhabitable and destroying others. Homes and farmland will be ruined and rural character and heritage lost. Petition Text: To Weld County Commissioners and representatives and officials of the City of Greeley, Town of Windsor, County of Weld and State of Colorado: We, the undersigned residents of Northern Colorado, are deeply concerned about the plan for the widening of O Street between 83rd Avenue(County Road 27)and Hwy 85. We urge our representatives and public officials to: Consider other alternatives to the widening of O Street such as improvement and widening of US Hwy 34 and State Hwy 392 to alleviate projected traffic flow. Total signatures 31 (Signature comments can be viewed in the Appendix of this document) # FirstName Surname Town/City S/C/P Comment Date 31 Steve Graham Greeley CO View Nov 16,2008 30 Brianna Cruz-Heath Eaton CO View Nov 14,2008 29 Rodriguez Claudia Evans Co,Weld View Nov 13,2008 28 Peggy Cowan Loveland Colorado N/G Nov 10,2008 27 Scott Chvatal Atwood KS N/G Nov 09,2008 26 Sadie M Schraeder Windsor Co N/G Nov 02,2008 25 Jennifer Beilman Greeley CO N/G Oct 19,2008 24 Brooke Delisle-Bettmann Greeley CO N/G Oct 14,2008 23 Phyllis Schultz Greeley CO View Oct 09,2008 22 George Doering Greeley CO N/G Oct 09,2008 21 Gayle Doering Greeley CO N/G Oct 09.2008 20 Jan Meyer Windsor CO N/G Sep 23,2008 19 Dana Wagenhoffer Milliken CO View Sep 22,2008 18 Jane Miller Eaton CO View Sep 21,2008 17 Lorraine Seger Ault CO View Sep 20,2008 16 Lisa Wolfe Windsor CO N/G Sep 17,2008 15 Shirley J Stroberg Eaton CO View Sep 14,2008 14 Zachery Marshall Ault Colorado N/G Sep 14,2008 13 George&Joann Firestien Ault Colorado N/G Sep 14,2008 12 Chuck&Delores Ehrlich Casper Wyoming N/G Sep 14,2008 11 Wilbert&Viola Gebhardt Windsor Colorado N/G Sep 14,2008 10 Dawn Stein Greeley CO View Sep 13,2008 9 Freddy&Gloria Keil Greeley Colorado View Sep 13,2008 8 Richard Moore Greeley CO View Sep 13,2008 7 Sharon M. Cropper (Schmidt) Greeley Co. View Sep 13,2008 6 Mike Brehon Greeley Co. View Sep 13,2008 PETITION:Stop the Widening of O Street Petition Page 1 Powered by GoPetiOon # FirstName Surname Town/City S/C/P Comment Date 5 Ramona Valdez Windsor Co. View Sep 11,2008 4 Glen Sanders Severance Co View Sep 11,2008 3 Cathy Thomas Littleton Co N/G Sep 11,2008 2 Elizabeth Ponce Greeley CO View Sep 10,2008 1 Wendy Kruger Fort Collins Colorado, N/G Sep 10,2008 Weld I 'N/C-field not collected by the author 'N/G-not given by the signer 'S/C/P-State,County or Province 'View-view comment PETITION:Stop the Widening of O Street Petition Page 2 Powered by GOPetitiey Appendix: All signatures comments 31 Back to signature list I just moved back to Greeley from Texas and am disgusted in how much farmland is being eaten away. There are plenty of roads to get from Greeley to Windsor or Loveland without displacing a family history by building another stupid high traffic road. Drivers can use hwy 34 or 392. 30 Back to signature list I am completely against imminant domain. Find another way to complete O Street 29 Back to signature list Please leave the familys house there. Where I Personlly do not see no problem in making the street around teh house instad of through it. 23 Back to signature list I understand your position and surely stand on your side of this concern. My years of living in peace in the country were wonderful and I want you to live there without damage to your property. Good Luck! 19 Back to signature list Don't destroy another persons property just to straighten a road. These people have spent there lives paying for their farms and homes and citizens of Greeley, Weld County and Windsor have NO right to take these peoples homes-just to straighten a road.As my representative I request that you VOTE NO!!!! 18 Back to signature list Good luck, Ruth. Keep fighting, 17 Back to signature list Once again, the Weld County Commissioners have made a decision that has damaging effects on our environment and public recreation. This group continues to respond to a few"squeaky wheels"and disregard options that benefit the greater good of the community. 15 Back to signature list I feel this is taking our freedom away. A committe should not be allowed to take postion of proporty when there is another way around it. 10 Back to signature list Use the existing road, save taxpayers money and save these folks homes! If it was a city council member who lived in any of the properties affected it's guaranteed they would use any alternative route! 9 Back to signature list We suggest that the County Commissioners and Representatives reconsider other alternatives to help alleviate the future traffic flow and problems and not destroy the pristine farms and land that has been in the families livlihood for years. Why do we have to use this idea ---- I'm sure we can come up with a better plan for all individuals concerned! PETITION:Stop the Widening of 0 Street Petition Page 3 Powered by Qi Po l.0o Kindest regards, Gloria, Freddy&family 8 Back to signature list It makes no sense to run a road through choice farmland when a road 1/2 mile north of 0 Street and 83rd Ave could be used!! 7 Back to signature list Just like you indicated Save the tax payers money and use and make the road that is present improved. How dare the city goverment try destroying productive land which has been protected for decades,plus it being very fertile land. 6 Back to signature list we're against the road. There are better alternatives! 5 Back to signature list There are always other alternatives to look at then to take away what doesn't belong to you! I suggest you work on I-25 and Hwy 392 which needs huge relief. Why is it that contractors with money get their way? What about the pioneesrs who settled and the hard working people, don't we count? 4 Back to signature list This road widening should never happen.There are other alternatives then taking a property and destroying it. The people that live there(whom I know)count on that property for their livelihood. Look in the mirror and ask yourself if you would like it to be kicked out of your home, something you have spent your entire life building. (Do you like what you see in looking back at you?)Come on, do the right thing. Do NOT kick these people out. 2 Back to signature list This farm has been in the family for generations. It should not be stolen from the family for the sake of"progress".There are other alternatives. PETITION'Stop the Widening of 0 Street Petition Page 4 Powered by GoPeo,an STOP O STREET PETITION To Weld County Commissioners and representatives and officials of the City of Greeley, Town of Windsor, County of Weld, and State of Colorado: We, the undersigned residents of Northern Colorado, are deeply concerned about the plan for the extension and alignment of O Street (County Road 64) between Weld County Road 27 and Weld County Road 23. • The noise and pollution caused by the construction and use of the O Street extension and alignment will severely impact the ecosystem of the Cache la Poudre River riparian corridor. American Rivers has already declared the Cache la Poudre River America's third most Endangered River. • The highway will negatively impact the Cache la Poudre National Heritage Area and the Poudre River Trail Corridor. • The Colorado Department of Wildlife opposes the O Street Alignment. There is an abundance of wildlife in this last stretch of undeveloped riparian corridor. Construction of this highway will cause wildlife and recreation areas to be destroyed and open space opportunities to be lost. • Homes and farmland will be demolished and rural character and heritage lost. We urge our representatives and public officials to: Consider other alternatives to the O Street extension such as improvement and widening of US Hwy 34 and State Hwy 392 and use of the existing Weld County Road 64.5. If an alternative for O Street must be approved, we urge our representatives and public officials to: Approve the blue alignment alternative which travels south of the intersection of O Street and 83rd Avenue. (The blue alignment would be less destructive than the currently preferred yellow alternative which travels straight through the intersection and destroys two homes and associated farm buildings (Alignment alternative information per the study completed by Felsburg, Holt and Ullevig.) Name (Please Print) City, State,Zip 1. O/ iUFr- e. iLL Lifra1m;F km S',2-O 2. 3. 4. 5. RETURN COMPLETED PETITION TO: STOP O STREET, 30951 Weld pounty Road 7 Cr;CO 80631 �.1?/t (t P/?( 1C L C1Lc J /t1E�7 tai y�r «I28 Srf± w% u2�-=1 2�� pih (V� /l lc / ~ arLaa STOP O STREET PETITION To Weld County Commissioners and representatives and officials of the City of Greeley, Town of Windsor, County of Weld, and State of Colorado: We, the undersigned residents of Northern Colorado, are deeply concerned about the plan for the extension and alignment of 0 Street (County Road 64) between Weld County Road 27 and Weld County Road 23. • The noise and pollution caused by the construction and use of the 0 Street extension and alignment will severely impact the ecosystem of the Cache la Poudre River riparian corridor. American Rivers has already declared the Cache la Poudre River America's third most Endangered River. • The highway will negatively impact the Cache la Poudre National Heritage Area and the Poudre River Trail Corridor. • The Colorado ['apartment of Wildlife opposes the 0 Street Plignrnent. There is an abundance of wildlife in this last stretch of undeveloped riparian corridor. Construction of this highway will cause wildlife and recreation areas to be destroyed and open space opportunities to be lost. • Homes and farmland will be demolished and rural character and heritage lost. We urge our representatives and public officials to: Consider other alternatives to the 0 Street extension such as improvement and widening of US Hwy 34 and State Hwy 392 and use of the existing Weld County Road 64.5. If an alternative for O Street must be approved, we urge our representatives and public officials to: Approve the blue alignment alternative which travels south of the intersection of 0 Street and 83rd Avenue. (The blue alignment would be less destructive than the currently preferred yellow alternative which travels straight through the intersection and destroys two homes and associated farm buildings (Alignment alternative information per the study completed by Felsburg, Holt and Ullevig.) Name Please Print? City, State, Zip - ATF/tay fl /teJ.S(H P ££,uftc✓/Iig.:4e /i, f/hxm5OR,fi,C 60_75C 2. in AN, S L. W\ c acv / 3I yl AV Le �062L/ 7 r 3. 4.-11 •. ft 11( 4 �>nf2 Co. d5SSo RETUR O PLETED PETITION TO: STOP O STREET, 30951 Weld County Road 27, Greeley, CO 80631 STOP 0 STREET PETITION 6.c WilVA (ASCU& 15eli Utter/ CO CI.57-0t 7. '� .C_ t U /l (,t/v- /37 Sc.e t, e tc.;ex- r-#i2 . l.P)s u d cc fc.. , Co gOS 8. �/ 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. STOP 0 STREET PETITION To Weld County Commissioners and representatives and officials of the City of Greeley, Town of Windsor, County of Weld and State of Colorado: We, the undersigned residents of Northern Colorado, are deeply concerned about the plan for the extension and alignment of 0 Street (County Road 64) between Weld County Road 27 and Weld County Road 23. • The noise and pollution caused by the construction and use of the O Street extension and alignment will severely impact the ecosystem of the Cache la Poudre River riparian corridor. American Rivers has already declared the Cache la Poudre River America's third most endangered river. • The highway will negatively impact the Cache la Poudre National Heritage Area and the Poudre River Trail Corridor. • The Colorado Department of Wildlife opposed the O Street Alignment. There is an abundance of wildlife in this last stretch of undeveloped riparian corridor. Construction of this highway will cause wildlife and recreation areas to be destroyed and open space opportunities to be lost. • Homes and farmland will be demolished and rural character and heritage lost. We urge our representatives and public officials to: Consider other alternatives to the widening of 0 Street such as improvement and widening of US Hwy 34 and State Hwy 392 and use of the existing Weld County Road 64.5. If an alternative for O Street must be approved, we urge our representatives and public officials to: Approve the blue alignment which travels south of the intersection of 0 Street and 83`d Avenue. (The blue alignment would be less destructive than the currently preferred yellow alternative which travels straight through the intersection and destroys two homes and associated farm buildings. Alignment alternative information per the study completed by Felsburg, Holt and Ullevig.) NAME (PLEASE PRINT) City, State, Zip 1. 2. -UV,b�FL. �. KchcoJ�.r W1hetSeor Co 8 o SS a, 3. RETURN COMPLETED PETITION TO: STOP O STREET, 30951 Weld County Road 27, Greeley, CO 80631 STOP 0 STREET PETITION 4. Jeannc Harsh, Leswe.ia4Act CO $053$ 5. 4 Isig Yusr it re;e rb.it— 017ici-t o4. n o l©55-0 Z'/Oo Pt cone-6* s�w.bex ( ahuair - i s co Ro5a5 7. Lin A p) 'Vi A/SH UICLuNG7`ANICci SOS-5(9 8. MA."7 L urr er' C5 4cs Pet//c Cn Sear/7 9.Mari/351 J & ,9h?a) LQYeiand W 10531 lJ// 1o.`f lP.c {-Jot bitty' (3bb,ItAcQ-46(1, yee%( )&1)63/ Cora. Iv Goerzt � •.ff i W.C.? k b/�ree le 12.IJ e►-sob /€e f' lI /sofr - /an's- C'-nakraRo-.d.o 13. / r 6 eA" / J L //o tter& )4/?a A.462 t io e d 14. rrn n , i 1,+ �Z . U �{ -� D n 15. ✓fRIvA F SAAik c‘A0 So? t'eLtcae deisirtr,C,ka 16. Joyce_(thin metier (p Lo c", &J,'ndso i e 17. Lc, rn , ;der /991 - S°SF Rv ad l'rr eiy,C`' 18. -Aratif3 C (rQrLlf7 at7y c �LOCAL (Alath/Drib 806SO 19. .1, f .e tit 3. Dr' e}'\'‘ 42 0 0- r S.4i ; „I c o r, Ca . 8o 5.1-4: RETURN COMPLETED PETITION TO: STOP O STREET,30951 Weld County Road 27, Greeley, CO 80631 20. Do0 O1 Het-t&t.. 3 TXcmckrou A-r6 Fr. d'oLL os, Ce Saws 21. 74iA ,?4eaBY /coal LOA L,vu r rx.in tc C44 so6c. O-6 90≤so 22.my,ead 3 ANAtnnd /37/ J,qi.✓,hv et/ 2e - 11,n/oowt Cis 70-4--; 23. c/art,c 2 I Niacar 32/2 .Lace 4o 1-n Foci CO/%s%S 80So?,g 24.leo.VA #c777nfyez Lci - Co. yes. 25. My 4#/ricer" 12/ x- 4-pe e1v Co a9s 26. Eicio tot $ 1 /oo2 3 # W i v-ttro r 27. if a- h o l d W Di.i Let 7h acre) 13 rd. e er PT/.W415 i0- 28. /504 �i-frodie 4-j 8130 5pbarmbrFa AyJg. 10Rosa I ,' ,\ 1 29G,Qry eij v 30. Mel J aco y dos 6 s}. wl.�dsy; ca, 22 l (,v ',NbSbe 31. A)e U UJ'k& ee^ t; s4kPe1Su c,Ktc Cr' 32. fLMER L /4W Q.de; 4/4K s>:, w /A/Pc90 CO 33. /Pat L. vd 30, we- SJ- tv.'.4dsdr Go 34.��-1jJ f/ Co 35. vg s f J /444 tour O pt !] c rt. 36. X� 1033W 3 3 Lt/ �,4�1. 7t0:7S RETURN COMPLETED PETITION TO: STOP 0 STREET,30951 Weld County Road 27, Greeley, CO 80631 37. cC U,(t-v it 4'0_1 /�S g 4I �GJ fr 38. 71y Sir 14 V 39.274eta Sitekt.— J ` D ( , 6 14g/ "y'lJlf' 40. 'Makic,C .. &mom 41. 42. 1,45(fN r 1lxlaK ;L`26 1-trc.e */ EAT-74N 43. aet44.4c-de e.rt .J3 i rye eVYz> Ems,C:7, 44. art j 45. a+At Vrecjgr isot ole,4u C1 . GreeIo-y ,C°P 46. (to r,e�[c )t�aKS & 38.ts — w/y °Ai G ce .ersinf, rt , 47.2..A /l}-a114 St 48.Y2tux.ld f ak 39o4 W o'LIsT cSk. G r C4eM ,CO go 63t 49. r 11i. /est 2„,_ /S'4 s) iZ� �� go`6jt" 5 fr, 51. n .L .. G Pr0YY3 mot~ 52. mdek lQ/tj tits 3n-ru SR£SIEY CO SO&31 53. aa59. 4L eC�� *D l�, Co S'a6 RETURN COMPLETED PETITION TO: STOP 0 STREET, 30951 Weld County Road 27, Greeley, CO 80631 57. - 55. (1 dwa l 'mMy Hiciad 56. (6,--e& (3 L`i'-1 rwwwee► 3te'rent t S re r 57. AL-fcc4VrtnC 51iai (& ilc-ia i J-5 58AkA,t Amiu d 9 )ZU mri iE_ .\i„vAi PS 59.72 -�J 1 avl J C,✓c ,✓„2s 60. LO Ali kantr-7Q-- P��i,( I 62 n-Y)Q/l/ 61. 0--.------...r, ),_Uc.. /2o..-L..-_,L_,--- rm 62. d1VUE 0,614/zu. (ID 4/44,,6/2 63. A . beL Xg 11'/I142Q-12 64. q • - uA Ai- c\ JaeltattikL J 1 Ca * ic-- 65. LA A 1 ik-c'ty` —7s s I, p 4 uir i 66. !J,t*h (HA/ roc.----1 (` 1/, (v C 67. I -KA:0 ow c, et) ,fl ire / / k) 68.1'fl-/ 69.A4, (g., co:it__ 70. RETURN COMPLETED PETITION TO: STOP O STREET,30951 Weld County Road 27, Greeley, CO 80631 5-i r n r\ce ..r„ �r-i rt Oaki 71. ',l/ (1J flit 5 fiCl � Vr / I 72O H 4 i R1{ - - _t? kR\ - I MCK clic} it 73. -7� 7_,42r-1------ 1DN1N \). S ` — 74. 1,Oj act ✓f L`x-c6-e_ v7 75. 9AA \ &9 r, cSaya IA 1-YO IA 76. Ld /rit-,-in. v1*---— Cl/VAC ti /!SC!!174.1 77. C: (1 C2r1 \\ ; t I , �J 78. -a \ccc �\N!1 A c.. 79. Pa wit xi/l/'Ifl4' /�� l 80. c1dnr / 81. \ , .--y` .-.----lL 7u (.r a/s:14 r,>>,-- 82. to `e' 0,•ff)t c..<cz c 83. ar ---- v-7�i1 i A--c-4 , k\A c c�9 if r 14 84. l4' I 4' * cute 2 - 1 `'ci1ei(kIvl 85. A. h l % eaVfi A. 1, ` C. t n �j� X11 87.\ L 9t.{ A ) l i- GWE Gl D.L J ik- ss R TU N COMPL ITION TO: ST O STREET, 30951 Weld County Road 27, Greeley, CO 80631 88. 1�..7/#4nL.e-) ,D R.- 89. &77 GUa /ke,C Cvindso2, Co 0D4r I C.kPy Nei-sit // ' 90. �/ Gf/ig4/ ojsoP C0 91. Ho ward fiers h N ,'n eI So Ov 92. . frIA4a7W2112 W e ek -1-&A/42,S CQ 93. it r'4 He' aS v r, ec617F- 1.e, i Hci npin./Cd 94. LJesle y LU€Ae (-Fee 41 co 95. 1/ (4k. WeSICS't2•c"" Z?RE:E c.L7 Qb.. 96. 01.):=11/4)(V( . VeSST CR @CS:k ELy C 0 97. Liatt .f k,g4s2 A-�) e® / r- 98. 7 /'o Stillf /c14(1-- f Atli) (6 e /� 99. 6 CU/MS ins Gre l 100. 5S G72�466e C2 Sy eo 101. 2J4 / .2✓ Cr 1, �CO 102. -da7 2 i•->-r.- vac-je_ �-C7�C�'�'L- , GvCd 103. CZ A`.+ "v 104. 1� 7.a1.�X.�p J atoeni et, RETURN COMPLETED PETITION TO: STOP O STREET, 30951 Weld County Road 27, Greeley, CO 80631 105. v SEA A . ( Ndtsr 106.MA re>- T 02.4 ✓ /rte' 1^ 107. v79rle T KJ09frkt r 108. ArineLee, lC ewi 109. tiliQ.rren Rr2ri1 J 110. /5 R Y SU/NE/joie? 111. G u 9 re- r\ S t 112.D 17( Cr Vi 9T 113. O4 Kc r y W. E 114. r-- `✓ !v At a 115. 0k/r9_ 116. R DLyn 1ipfon 117. Deb flu 0I I ers 118. renew_ n J-- 0 nson 119. LJDhri5an 120. tiIO8'1i .. 1bJO56nn 121. niekAr J /J So in TURN COMPLETED PETITION TO: STOP 0 STREET, 30951 Weld County Road 27, Greeley, CO 80631 C2 STOP 0 STREET PETITION NAME (PLEASE PRINT) City, State, Zip 13( • Canrist,u‘a_ k-.\.n5kfu-vol Gccebe--1 co g O6i t . � � ti \\ �, , c:,:\ Z Gi&E: 1@Y co, s(> 4-, '3Q L_or-eA-e f t.F.e.456w. L� r.eLlr2y ( n �WCo3+ fina±i ln-t eYS L7ree6y re) E'er', s , Aeuss6tt. i,„4 / 1 _ /— _sec,rk/. �,e,e44C6y Co Ovtv3y i3c \-\ .(':A\mer c, -A h3 Gceei C ©j rzr3c(%o 1-I 1 /.itJ p f,/ 4/7,e , r CO 0637 rSock5 kt• S P AQWCS Cate 1wJ e gu39 0 N --a u\Vri-// Cae,el ey (t `S0(o3 V !:) _/kw_, h , s--ntf Q-A/ lw 0Si3v 00 a s6' of ioft Lr/4t'5 ro 8-OL0zo `'3 Tare. Kcwcfrnan EJaf13 ('_0 8[Xo20 ee ?1 ttiCA 6ceeley 8 Ro63Y �� l`-rANe,., Qv.h(1 6 teeAcbCo O6L( \\., CO �S° RETURN COMPLETED TITION TO: STOP O STREET, 30951 Weld County Road 2 , Greeley, CO 8 63 CO W ZO S- i ci l� M {nva n G-1l:l an a STOP 0 STREET PETITION NAME (PLEASE PRINT) City, State, Zip )GF \ er.J 1-"ic4 N ec/n; ct bee e l e j I to. si Ob 3c l4 (i1r,a ' Gn99 CO sg(0.3A if;-, , Ste 3: 1-kiNAgfra a,?-e-al gas/ H, J ,t-iti r , ok:�t.,F, rocL_fr z� (z` aC%ie ;�� 'y1 ter ' , Ci fl_l i c y'�i(,; . H.,, I LSOO JL /-/opger p:� pa .y7-24-7aV 7:Sci.n e din 0 ne- (3-i c_e•e1,,4 00 20 6 ay Ic,b 1 > e. n r-r--, n-,M ( fl1 o ,k,4 r V,--(. 4 C O SOG2o icutcl .qtuLs C9`PRQ.ci Co 2Jo,Sj Hik : 1„1,, ,,, ,, ()Stun C er Jr1 VD (c 7 3oh i\c,�`\1()orya \ Greeye L) C0 90G3/ V)cc 'M\ al,v\\ c G‘1=e_(e ll CO c'%%31 RETURN COMPLETED PETITION TO: STOP O STREET, 30951 Weld County Road 27, Greeley, CO 80631 0 (&) Cc) ( r)(e' 3/ 0_15f i'e L . cay (.712c->✓ c Co 'D ', 3 / STOP 0 STREET PETITION NAME (PLEASE PRINT) City, State, Zip y, } ,,, 1� GeCb t C: BZ,i3! ''et'` vktcc,o'Y-vsjtx Bi-teiai, co Soto \ D`i--4<ctir 1/4--e t, vi , ter C (c s\O I:-/ o SC--lKoebC]Z free(el , Q ga63 I 7 l' ,-, Som .8N �e z& CO '3063 ke.6tK4kL, IC411i'n 61 r.e.eie,y / (O 804 'S Li "Ilacy C . 54-e;o b(ectjc v Qv"e 'c9 CO 0ce3 ay, .siY,:vd ecLeK C`7 u- `ft//4 o`l '5r 61SOCLK kAJ C/) Mc/ -, l J Alan .D 0 6redi) CO 80h3 t/ S4 ,-r hJe S 4J;,,.csor . Co ftsSca re,e I . a , r;: ? (2 / w zed 62,e / Ga may- xi/044,o, 7ti rcff Ci'.efi-A0—, a ,rie9CQ3- 5 RETURN COMPLETED PETITION TO: STOP O STREET, 30951 Weld County Road 27, Greeley,CO 80631 > I PAW-PC/L ✓ L o,e/Wc& G E Le 7 _a Y6C 5/ C o- i-te-A. ..Y, i,-"tea. Co . 8 0 5 So Dame, CP[ eP \STOP 0 STREET PETITION COSI 11 O4y, Ske, Z;p ///c-, ec./4 /LSD y o� i a Kot` 7' a ft . S/v ' G' .B2sj" asi ecz3/ H Il it E-f-c1 - i� a .,o t3/ ilidy c /140 £ta4 re astsiy , ' n Weed C / ca 8004 APIA{1Rle L�arC' &re-elei (dSo6al . 4ba&&.ct frtigcnity, eo grecor 0 A , . gobsci jkan, r �r)v. 6Q.(-E- le,--,Awf-tt -61<_/L-- 43A/ Co( (Vcs(a2a 1i'Ilain )7IlersrcrkAle! SL�111�(� S Q `,'�/� � ,�c� � / ��v Bas RETURN COMPLETED PETITION TO: STOP O STREET,30951 Weld County Road 27, Greeley, CO 80631 t STOP 0 STREET PETITION NAME (PLEASE PRINT) City, State, Zip Jamb �l Gar e.e\e,�, , �0b 3f 2i..,-; nk... le-r.15 I- 61 -4.--e-/ a . C",o 1_1 ) I- i r i 9 c - - . e e@ RE t Crr eet PP 9'.x.37 I\eo Lew /2 Glee/-0' y O; eoG3Li 1\11 Fr I P A -F ' s (3, i-f i . _ r, ( n Lafr�1 'be.rh it`c _ f . Coil c s co S S'.29 C4bf-r/ Cite 4 gfdopi1 Ca. 6/5-46/ e. .v"-_ r Cb '� �� -2;C Pel (vrazIoy Cd , fart Batnal.S (real OD KAG3 ) n ( >( / f-//i` vl i I`C�P( �r,L PPet if r- 4,7„5r,t rPPIr, (6 1637 RETURN COMPLETED PETITION TO: STOP O STREET, 30951 Weld County Road 27,Greeley, CO 80631 f STOP 0 STREET PETITION NAME (PLEASE PRINT) City, State, Zip Vi z&in1( Pr E.•"hona5 ror-eel-9 Co Tseb3tf , 'G . kt+ ConV j, n GC-eeisi Ct go634- \1 cK ; L ICo<wten EO3-on Go 80615 Mat < e_ Po cwAnn E air)n CoR-0445 )116/1, I i A d a44 1 6ree4 do gd 631 1 l r. 2 so o ( : er,,07, pot/ Ocj l a"t d V1�S • d i✓�l" ( Ulf (4(v, 16kg-. v, (a,� FLfa.c \ A L.," a c co O5S(:,) 2? fr i :TV:t7 0 ($17}D tit, : skips dg, ( () Ec c5-0 Can,n rtt,&n itt9.5 F+ Ld l L I,its GZ) 8165 all- , I )e,/ irl l-1-c r ci---c-tIt t rc %'3Y __sob4, „<„,..,,,,,, � rce l c Co 8 °65<( / ' Mdrlu �t Kt 4.er". `1 rce (er CO 130C-VI 04/110 -1? )(1x.-P_:r- Q / CD gosj ` ' ` aji t 1w ►,,AL,A, G r c c /Gy Go rd a 3g f AA nary E. em r_c�r/�' C, �^ e l �� l�3 RETURN COMPLETED PETITION TO: STOP O STREET, 30951 Weld County Road 27, Greeley, CO 80631 STOP 0 STREET PETITION NAME (PLEASE PRINT) City, State, Zip 23m %c'r v. ., ,-)n cicle, ,-- .11-211.4.likar4 gat i, a, eleeie y Co F06 3 Y t- rock 6ree fey Co ?oGzO Sh,,'Jc NI .Bresky E✓any Co So 620 7°Sc--C Auer .`x,e_ 1 \ L roe]cy 66 80 36f g r l'illPtliI CArk Get9 te-t/ CO s ocs R, iiiI.,- gm or c"--41 -ra-te 't CO - C) (O3 /y 13 r i rde -b Fri tt CifteietiGel 80(03 - ' ' A \\OSker pa n chi\I-Anc,, km5-3-2 ' - cm&r-c -4s-4sLin,, LicbiQel G ,G • g os3RAT.' - cL -1---i-b-e„ --e-•9-c- / 67Thcti4-(27/ CCOCY r\LV £!2 �e��d (CO Dd ,,,, , (\44„__ ,., KANP— RiciAs ( a `dia 0t.A/ (r 6r< le° , CO ON/ / ( ,/,,, 9e,& VeA✓\ I o,,A5 co 2000 RETURN COMPLETED PETITION TO: STOP O STREET, 30951 Weld County Road 27, Greeley, CO 80631 STOP 0 STREET PETITION To Weld County Commissioners and representatives and officials of the City of Greeley, Town of Windsor, County of Weld and State of Colorado: We, the undersigned residents of Northern Colorado, are deeply concerned about the plan for the extension and alignment of 0 Street (County Road 64) between Weld County Road 27 and Weld County Road 23. • The noise and pollution caused by the construction and use of the 0 Street extension and alignment will severely impact the ecosystem of the Cache la Poudre River riparian corridor. American Rivers has already declared the Cache la Poudre River America's third most endangered river. • The highway will negatively impact the Cache la Poudre National Heritage Area and the Poudre River Trail Corridor. • The Colorado Department of Wildlife opposed the 0 Street Alignment. There is an abundance of wildlife in this last stretch of undeveloped riparian corridor. Construction of this highway will cause wildlife and recreation areas to be destroyed and open space opportunities to be lost. • Homes and farmland will be demolished and rural character and heritage lost. We urge our representatives and public officials to: Consider other alternatives to the widening of 0 Street such as improvement and widening of US Hwy 34 and State Hwy 392 and use of the existing Weld County Road 64.5. If an alternative for 0 Street must be approved, we urge our representatives and public officials to: Approve the blue alignment which travels south of the intersection of O Street and 83rd Avenue. (The blue alignment would be less destructive than the currently preferred yellow alternative which travels straight through the intersection and destroys two homes and associated farm buildings. Alignment alternative information per the study completed by Felsburg, Holt and Ullevig.) RETURN COMPLETED PETITION TO: STOP O STREET, 30951 Weld County Road 27, Greeley, CO 80631 STOP 0 STREET PETITION NAME (PLEASE PRINT) City, State, Zip • RETURN COMPLETED PETITION TO: STOP O STREET, 30951 Weld County Road 27, Greeley, CO 80631 STOP 0 STREET PETITION %�NAM_E (PLEASE PRINT) City, State, Zip ./ -7) �' I l i C)-1+ '1 s it_eAe. C.c� f(D Y ?E';' 'Sam Wck c 5 GN.Q__(.3Ae_ I Co E63(1 .... -)� - ---ct a vo( C 't .4,, c,ii-, CI re eA c Li Cc &6,3q ____----, , ,.,,,,.4, j (3 bn a V C\ c,--t-t---, a t-e,e, de.LA Co FacSV `,',-, r-.e lble. C I- 04-c k 6 r•e e (,2-11 CU WC)(D RETURN COMPLETED PETITION TO: STOP O STREET, 30951 Weld County Road 27, Greeley, CO 80631 STOP O STRrr T T rT; ; :::4 NAME (PLEASE PRINT) City, State, Zip -le-7(9 l o - ' - (7,---ee (, (. ® , 5�''6 J/ ' I 7 i 1 1 7e, • e 7c,?. 4..-• balliittl€4 P.,i.'-0 C.11.-,,.C: l..L Li; L.r. ILI I h Cti-‘,,-:.2.. 1 Ci 2P-`t . ' 1 t !-. .__ . . L- ..; t.:uf_.. ( L._....v'L)(i vc ?ip() w j,•* t`-',5 ''.7(r..- f*'rt' r,W ..' Cam' l-'CCU i-/ /!",, ‘ \\\c,„A j1/4 cl) \.,..4 i,,p, C4itekil tk) Su 6 ,._)1 M i'�:=)-v . . .... . $ " vi r .y i,t)-_, , _ „...,_ ( ..etkyret.i.. ......__ it! N4-4:-.)_.i2s-e:i ( - )U-- -5 1j __ , ,I / r •r' � ti �� .4�' . !'---_ ,• r% i t \ , (1 2(pi �..` � 4. ' , I • rk.!-- _ . . ,„, r .r : c'r t t: :S'4 5 5 7; STOP O STREET PETITION To Weld County Commissioners and representatives and officials of the City of Greeley, Town of Windsor, County of Weld, and State of Colorado: We, the undersigned residents of Northern Colorado, are deeply concerned about the plan for the extension and alignment of O Street (County Road 64) between Weld County Road 27 and Weld County Road 23. • The noise and pollution caused by the construction and use of the 0 Street extension and alignment will severely impact the ecosystem of the Cache la Poudre River riparian corridor. American Rivers has already declared the Cache la Poudre River America's third most Endangered River. • The highway will negatively impact the Cache la Poudre National Heritage Area and the Poudre River Trail Corridor. • The Colorado Department of Wildlife opposes the 0 Street Alignment. There is an abundance of wildlife in this last stretch of undeveloped riparian corridor. Construction of this highway will cause wildlife and recreation areas to be destroyed and open space opportunities to be lost. • Homes and farmland will be demolished and rural character and heritage lost. We urge our representatives and public officials to: Consider other alternatives to the 0 Street extension such as improvement and widening of US Hwy 34 and State Hwy 392 and use of the existing Weld County Road 64.5. If an alternative for O Street must be approved, we urge our representatives and public officials to: Approve the blue alignment alternative which travels south of the intersection of O Street and 83rd Avenue. (The blue alignment would be less destructive than the currently preferred yellow alternative which travels straight through the intersection and destroys two homes and associated farm buildings (Alignment alternative information per the study completed by Felsburg, Holt and Ullevig.) Name (Please Print) City, State, Zip 1. YPa , tie , L.tJyw,.4v. gene,) Cr. & b 49 2. �✓ �; �1/ i 3. Oa Pa+1y SsJ, Muw�i GaY.bw `N X06;/ 4. /tlo.ry pnn Le r- P/a"L'te0; / � c 804S/ • RETURN COMPLETED PETITION TO: STOP O STREET, 30951 Weld County Road 27, Greeley, CO 80631 r STOP 0 STREET PETITION 6. fray-a.x. toe, E 2/nc 3414 his &n'ese(ay 7. : ._ :�� 3802- kJ i r �Ior/tV�- rc�e. c{ 8O 8. aayy- 9G 4,,e Ct. "B g bye CEO FOc 10. /� '� nppL�. -.l --T i c^T rr_L �v �(ws 11.r..4 S- -�6iEeiaad kJ try M.�' r� - — r f p4.12.13. 14. L2 ��N� ��iT e` ci91 y ze c Ard (o3y 15. tit =t q. X xo 99 9 c3/C. /qlJ• c u er din 7 16. —ss' 7'zjO hi,lr7 ,EJ 40 TAN 17. / - Q �C1 i &RNGLS X BLISS 4ae38 Al/5 � Utn� Cr.�t 96� 18. pLeon� Ge,:si'c < Ira 3 019 au"✓C Cif C. ..� Co 19. I axwl ai 5ec 4 &r' - 918 s- &4 t-a 6all e,Co, Boo q3 20. ls0W‘Cui na bel r s s'on 3 LJ 1 Sr arre,be1 en 21. P h i c e Mat /C Al de d 4i 7.;/ 3 e' C7a) ,l Coe)r 22. 1 Sri"!4- -o .XS,/- yamera 1e. /y ..�, et,..Porati 23.toae r// y ePA Iron 3CGaa &at et4r;vc, ?' 24. R/1}t1v1.69 %�./7/(o 396'1 1-D c3.2.l S/ grre ecia l 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. Petition Title : We are opposed to the extension of O Street and the Widening of O Street from US 85 to SH 257 Petition Signatures Collected in 2005 Total Signatures Collected : 762 WE ARE OPPOSED TO THE EXTENSION OF 0 STREET AND THE WIDENING OF O STREET FROM US 85 TO SH 257 Name Signature Address Date (please print) I 1C \11,11 'r ` del.,,,d)-4,-,A,4-.. Z I If 3 3 0-4 (, 4t S- i0/240r- 4Theettal tv 4 s L SQC l nUs 2.(R33 t v ct /6/7 3 r I I i,i(t nufai11 '\ tI,CICkii/vALIA4s t (ck 4y - w, C .. (G P-11itc i r - : , ' ' Ar 75_29, Ho-Hyke_.,Cir l',/a-itio5 pi* / \,,, c ` ,`►SDwZ £ % 4, z&4 Q\C. srk- tta , I\ c. I sx�a t tom( �- �4 raf it 3 1 Coco I °hC "�"J iIU ,d�'� 'ri�''��45fiJ 3/7 31 4451 F n e" adA5 Itirke-d- 4St C&ArgCet)Q9111241a H _ta., lrft ICer 72O6 /Ross /? if Or -revnEFt,v, , (, O$ U n i AV' l ,tl PI i-la j iC (c� it- 2 ,, a z S •1/2 3 /d 2411rL 17) (6%\0,- (10LUit, 1N9gShke Ot e4t10qt 51.0-1 Sig 1`;' iikAof Q it., 4 or Ccc .rin mthottan`o /14 74- WE ARE OPPOSED TO THE EXTENSION OF 0 STREET AND THE WIDENING OF 0 STREET FROM US 85 TO SH 257 Name Signature Address Date (please print) binic, ..9,‘-- Get( Mo / (Ace `f#ar /383 l Sn? f57 A0 ii-/0`5 ir c � , i rnr, .a.(t._,,,,,,,,, o q i tY /6/iy/cs r4 / (407; t s , - 10//y7Z5 oc Lb,,n- /K j Iq.",..4 1Y1'' . 9573 C✓ 91 5l _ l cf rii0.s / / - .I 7L . Lj/ t /7/2 D •! ,(1, lC 'a -5 '7- inutz 9i't i /Di tcr- .f&5T, a It rJJ -CJ - `sue ..nr� \V4 \C_0..I.m L.. !_�-i CH ., r\\ L k :0 ; 15 'V`C f { C 'C ecit 76„25 Rein„ Pe cA ev. 1 / O/7/5/(z (z QC Laces 9 ,o' ) f't c•cRY1ry „my/cc 7, ,,s_„` c�:,a_4.; ,\ 6-- '16Cj?.: 'D I CG\ c cl L (\ . C`1' l'It`�) 1 �_'J 1`l;l L [� ^ t �( kc , y�'.;dlLEI C^tL Cc) Oc�t'*( to/s/O -Litt,ej . ,yz-mil c e Coq /z/ %6 WE ARE OPPOSED TO THE EXTENSION OF 0 STREET AND THE WIDENING OF 0 STREET FROM US 85 TO SH 257 Name Signature Address • Date (please print) 3/ 1,`,,,, (//t0/ .£ 4 co 5 Pit'a /a- y--; Z f'jjt/ di%DES >4,7it ✓ O/1 ( C? )26"J SI , (m;rdiy- & 33 li_,.,:i'o,., kk,nea /_ 1177 ("Sr,- o_-o Or- i CAI: S 34+ inh d we ( /Cl'7�`v 1 1:/a;1=7, )(35 7 i;(c-/1 e or, lc je119 3� / I[l:PU [LIIC(CC (0,9.At- , Ili&iii/M (CDSC //cif'-Q196abl /G -if-L C (,/( k 1 i ( ( ( lJ-L t C/ iyi.W (c 'Th,ti /o1 oita4 44019 ,c-s __ 0--\-- / /I' 1 ' i ,-7S A ," et /C -P-c": G ('e✓or / Ups-fr,2 .i,� � L-A S Ji'15 1'ill A-✓e 1(-)- c>5 N,L+hL,ei-ea S , reuti y- r 6-3 7 19 Av‘eCt fD —F<—o` '`c (\f\-€41A v jfikidthi * 2S t/e of ,. poi k los li 4 g#Ave_G7-- /o-s--E6 /!7 VcrG Si . W;nr4cor 10— - oC •// ' im,,_1(1 91-1,(p (\ s',#5 S'et4eitz 7(97415— kob-Cr-ka 1raL2A - 2%5tAwse y /y 05 WE ARE OPPOSED TO THE EXTENSION OF 0 STREET AND THE WIDENING OF 0 STREET FROM US 85 TO SH 257 Name Signature Address Date (please print) 6 ( P'YJtJa\\ C'1* ki (aW , loSFQ1 ellQisiRs ►C0 _), - 4-) C ,--4-)4-- 71 C D0 ,.iVVA 7721_ vJ • (• S9'- P-.), Gt•'e e_lc7 i '/Ll nF stzi„,___, / t'v Q3 e47 lAi (-2 t La:S(414 , t Vi)Vt .l:7 e , . Q, f,, ,,_„, .. i.L.,,,o, s(rE LAstioro,M -114 L h.,�/ ee �cci �c �Q,-�rJw ig/Gevas ale Zne/nd /nom> -cS y , arty/ 7e-, Cr c' / /1---'"--1-_,-:" '--'rCJ-1/Al. ffwtc✓7 Ch_Fr " C:" c_iJ 70; '' 11t CLikt/ N ebAL LA" 2?{0-[le* a &tat) C6 Qici>,4 ►o g•0 ' ' 'i its. . ' ;"��lEIv'a� / 61,1/4: l1 h 2CCD____., w 1 J.) o C c v Safe 71)-c' Cl 71 00k V\CA*47.\--Y:i S -\.*N\C,0\c\,\CIVTak c;-14143 1 -I r ' 611 -cktLic le' ET)--OrS ei tick 1 (ZL,tc‘ dd' -di,P)oc) kfut ft -2NN c_111/4_aL )C _t1� -C 3 vfi i ' [b�l L�2�wiaL[tF1v 4A,t t t(L \ , 1CA��''�t )� '9A, ul,N. ��,�L btj(ccv i� '� C' � £.,n,,C Uri . ,:^' L...-:- iyi,s:,:a,+lLn— Or. ,..,._ia.;.- Cc 1,6;CC lC-6-Cs-5°9 - ,/) . / --6,93- r(tfirattuk,(6-. lAktunSe /6/Y/05 e, � w � `" WE An OPPOSED TO THE EXTENSION OF. 0 STREET AND THE WIDENING OF 0 STREET FROM US 85 TO SH 257 Name & Signature Address Date 6/1Jeci5 e%rvirt) �` �� Q 3331aq�M and3-72 6 '� /27C4 ' elt" /'o S // �lc'vJ AC (/(i t i&o,C 9 o Lib/6/' (7 il4 li Zit) haz.k4L?z) 1b 25 /1 , -J 1ar. ;10 , h; -i[.)4-!:'P/ 0 co.iiirg ggo /770,72G_L'/ U'i4/s0.4_ Ce . 974, • 272---i i i 11 nAfrXeicj 130-PK,0 , & ) ( „. CO 2—,:) 7--0.s -z1. Li° 8 s 7 T"--r e ii: 0 • 7:--o G 4.211 gl Lthe_53. A ciel 7----IrciS ` 11/3H -z-i-,./1.7_,/ 7r , 3-Lo J7.M�'`^� d reAe ,-- 2 /1/0...5 w J CIArf 5 . } a., are Cast v‘ . 4.. tpt 4 Gal /o /c e»f(c iiiiWi :t ' St)511 C1lCf 511n Q+ 4,3- P-_ Yce1e ( IL's vios ,±) z. 7S—.. X7(2 (---= eft 3 CL C ci c�tSo v (o �. 1 --o,C--- ,,ll 11 • 41/.1762 _ --27;t-- <.,/,,-t. ) 7/ 9 1-4-2 9c C�.1'/ -7-is E'llc-F,t6vi,,c_ 6rep., Ic-ai: Jet zc Y i Ac. / t ,w/,c-k-i ci z 3 e 4 ci 3 - ,I n� s :�-z Art? -c / flCt 623eiae- s4 � 4/3 � • L.L� s � WE ARE OPPOSED TO THE EXTENSION OF 0 STREET AND THE WIDENING OF 0 STREET FROM US 85 TO SH 257 Name Signature Address Date (please print) 7 _ )44rr %"f/t-- et-tzt /( /L--) / 7// 4 -C�r_ /'ol%- 7 4 e40,4_ r, (/e fix4341 . Ail I --' A ?// 4t// --)-aC.0gS 1 /W)CXt41-71- (Me UO Bcci IF_ Lail - -}7 c, C (1)Q„,c-FrA_V7_,cci,.--6 6 of_Oa,k_oigr 151t(itipa,,j_ litie_ P 11.131,C. ‘ 3't ...� tides bac);c�''�r �''� !_ � , f T 7 -3o�n(lt e t-)D9 AL,lrr I -c i � I J0cc�' /414. 2 ti 2 ca ec3 elfin, CMG W-3-5 s' /qA'/lam Igio Ilthsf S�`S (/� ✓ I y�^'n{�s/\��" /� 1'r i ):/i �re0010. G c' Cr) L Ir I N J�, f I I I4J V I I � III I.L, �./e�. 6�i b.5 II 1&IQ Ilra•,cT,&vi£br n It\ESS\e\2 Cain it, .t tri• l 1Src A Lorca -__,-- �{ " /t4, zs5-j p lU -22-0 s— , ' -"' \\\,;o4,) 4ici•ttti c . �(" � ) � T /S3/ ='5�/'`f iJ& /0 22 ( r- L A _ `� IL 4' 't ;lit 1V 12Di�- 1c'5-t1i ' . (6 It L/6 -179 (3 , d� (�� is 1' 1 k: 4,-<,,i, v� L >' L,'Aafe . 14 9, 't5c , stet 211tr- r! /°k- i i/VC=I . /70/2 _,./6:5 / . i ''-" ' r ,/6.• c Le itc.cii (.17linhcir' ,k ) 7 ' j I h 13 iceo ( ✓Lrik)��G it' Aix 6*e/er� lc/2z/ F� ''') 7 /r-8 4-„,,fr ;vz,('c,.,— Lt_7-1/_H,( l� / , GrQ c' IL/7,A)" / C. _ 3 z2-1 i 1,1 CL- tiew, r_CC' I t -n-ic_� W WE ARE OPPOSED TO THE EXTENSION OF 0 STREET AND THE WIDENING OF 0 STREET FROM US 85 TO SH 257 Name & Signature Address ,�e Date GPci k . ,r; `R\�ox Rc ‘vvr‘ y 6d% tAD - Sl- - C 0 withi 9- /Y - of Jo e- 4-5 .um- 453 cJ SA D} (ratty Cd 10699 9-/59-0<C lu �,J S ;L12'2 R.J ,R; y `I L ( ti, \A \\L-c,-L Q -C ci- ( 5-Uc. y A 11.2 e,- Pool kJ 44751- Gr-,0CQIO 7-6 0 5-- -xEc L3 @ l ink LiS25 kroLY4 0i- , Copt �LI 7 - z -L, -- (L/, -�e f / Z?It S-3 ,e9 C,l-t 6}�jdA 7 -23- `' 1 / 9.7-yrici v , S41/Uctilik- 5 ?VI tsi Cioatte CD 1-23-0c 'l�71 1, , _ ),3 CJ' 11) .-0,. _ C LI 1 ✓ _/ 1 ,:i✓ 3311-1 3 y 7)--t— -f 6 s7�.i /( i.q"v1 1 r 1 1 / WE ARE OPPOSED TO THE EXTENSION OF O STREET AND THE WIDENING OF O STREET FROM US 85 TO SH 257 Name Signature Address Date (please print) ro? p--e� C tl`t3Y ki, ) 4 SV t O)9 jor l ' wendin- itz lc. j V R+ 3-2,C wllPi4b a t !oh Y,t ., _ an-mi 525 , ' j,toodCi. Cv /0/7/05 f/co 44( J4 l �r�e r;,H (.4 /7(7 .3�/ /cc /a,/( �9S 1410/1011 / ---NI4Lc--- ' - • o\DEJ GAR-Err l 5/15-- &. III 8f. AVV & 'a-1 '-°c , ,;. DA„,44, . a;nn _..s41-C-Ihiq 6 gni fk/lA_ c if( 36 . s- , /5 =E Ct x`64 c f L_ ;;lic At&rh)-ez' _ A.fraZrizb V/tii IV VA S3-. clataeC, (e%i-CdS go c i A i / /Z 4i „, A �>Pa 9 /4-/2 -lr - 4-A4L,/ „ --5s-43 56 rct C7- , It jz -c SAA/v riA, Sol 6wt, 3! 33 Lot 42-M-9, areekiten /0-13 -06- J ;r CI( - • IN 31j3 , (s{""3\- . ( redey, C( ic- -r , c- . 1 WE ARE OPPOSED TO THE EXTENSION OF 0 STREET AND THE WIDENING OF 0 STREET FROM US 85 TO SH 257 Name Signature Address Date (please print)in 4l l cf-Pr i telUrs 61.LSS c) i), LIA3 , :6 /fir s+ �:_,C- .t-u✓,.w,A)1 A C'3 240 1.t c5C 11( UIV'Pau S r 0 g+-X e -7 '-e �rFcl°jtl) 1 'ilIDc,(C () )---1 1--( (II .`:1 1,1_. 0L ( c„.acc c 7 (c'., goo(,. '// i'z J:%�✓, M ((L R 1 Cipp 3z.Lq her,sctn ,Yf - CVaAs, C: 9U(;_2c:; IC/iciei / �� H� �� 2�; ��,.�� sl �_ :,, C 3062e 7 o /c if / 1)\ �.0 . 641\46i--1 rNI /CS- ' " =J-ef V Li �� CVS- -��tLuL_l,Vi,itt `u Liz3ca1)04Ct.wi (LEI\-ce scul--/ J `'ft-it)s (frc33.,, c cL, rici3c; 1JCa 5--k ("%eCIC/ Cc gSc(-3/ i1 /5-1A1 c2. / , ,;) .",3c( ta,H7Lk S1/2-CLO /65/3/11--- tr- J�� 157c1<tjI CO, ! jll (St Ord �ailOc- � � - K--- ri Ck2(-O' CO `reka%Ci lC)/( /CIS +��I1i"I« Cre 71'1%4-Z 3a IC�rka Ae.. c\)Encii% etti cirt.cl Cireeic(1 ro St»3z 1 !el )210<cr 1Z3L t07. not At_ ftztiIn) /1-j,' zrzix,2,i,-- di� C va lb SU7,r.-3q IORSS1a�/ IA ��-.. .4i L.O�_., : c 777„:J 2� i`� I j 0 �I6'4 ' ;t f ;, , <_ILI_ _f , L ,L.,,„ <<.LIw. ,�:ti ss �ti✓Y. /c// c-, /c ;_ / ,)°"l Al 'fob e_ c{ • 7 `t lb ri WE ARE OPPOSED TO THE EXTENSION OF 0 STREET AND THE WIDENING OF 0 STREET FROM US 85 TO SH 257 Name Signature Address Date (please print) e - a-a-a--0 Sr [0 17 i s frilai< ,au1 cble,nbeifq "1(n) -40 lfl5 5 ),n2 g26;/l /o/'i4; 1'1 /1 L-\ )1111 i 7CS .2t)-he , Si 4-11i).� iV7r ;v Q -1- r�r � r� 0(U i )i 1 170E / MA 9 (*Le oI lop i/s L? .%12L, c6",( c 6?/' -,f. )213d Al /Oh ,I J. -t;-�7— 4 / 9/ -2 7 arc- Avs 76 /,;,? 'c 2 .2- 4 it)/ �l Si- o ---4-- uS' 2smG�' r�� p� 0 ))..�� zc�`j car / i (�, w O ) %,� � I'(� lI / 3 T7_7. ce) • 77eliz 5y. gr , -in /9/21Y)/ /I&V(7,/2/r-lif,' _/c7-- d 0 e_1_71s.' S- k/t- /CAT,-- ( 1 t---)x) C''rL.Vyct� l .r\ \f'•.(!'\` C`--,ce kcc y Cc Zr. ( r(t-( ( r AlOc. PO eiSee;vobit-c- ✓�1 l e'i{i/y /O A2:-1.71 l%� (. i 1//A._ 1-o AT'45/0-r 3`r 7 Y Co-s147 (it A-rfs O4 C A> - Z,g.-q. ceFUca /O -(d'-or ilMir i 5TH/itiz WE ARE OPPOSED TO THE EXTENSION OF O STREET AND THE WIDENING OF O STREET FROM US 85 TO SH 257 Name Signature Address Date (please print) il OIN s-k.ot Luccs urk. dozos 3bil ,,1,ii, yh'""tut I 6-f A> Rr( Iv I c tl'cl tat, ‘37 0�at1 c Gc ��*f�r!c' /Z-/ �cC � v o)1O-.1-C.).}# ; cif/ 1 ► ^ `1 * 6307 1O,5- „,7I /Dy -oS 1 k( Wit.g\ c E rr, tt (Li i ' �ia,i✓A0)1,�y11,1.VV) tp -' t-k . I -0 - I�.n H G`' 1'c' bi�t�1A-12 i-iesce- Ala�,“-r�-I 4^-�- Sb 61 ,'. .z`l* 51et( is/i6/U5 �� c� aarRAtE i7( f'G4� 1/:127i'd gill? &) 2-9 "rte .13R-L; . (6/441- -- :\>5\ir:t.. L k.cc it IS f evrtkahln Oft a-- Ic/llei (6 /LC i ) % 4-LiV-Ihn �- a1tcheIle fen�� jr d<sc, r To ee 1-t1r1�' � - "V. �tMc.Li Liu ui1 - St CIv el-ol ('e 6b34 jc- ke-u5 '' (Baclq qty t cS QQvdu 6.(,. ta),wJ>z', CO ec,O `5e I cp- t u - h; `7,--,-e,,,, ( 6 ,( yr`'.<"-e) ' rtlL;. y T6(13 -%( te - a• Ds- at P 6 c Yc$oo ,- 4 gL(5-3— /dl/rA sr / P,w-Pk —Pe .1,cficS Vjj2& (.3. 9c)3s { -757 coy/6y s O We are opposed to the 0 Street Extension and Widening between Hwy 85 and Hwy 257 Name Signature Address Date (Print Name) //, . ,E Q .7�-,ti cur- 42+' It. Sam a c -. �r�r I , Z . - S 1i/z- 4 r �'�7 7 /;s7�/� /a'z' niSew 4 rood tY>zia. a(4 ,< ?-azszi., 316 A/ 4/.5-12 eh/ c i, 6 e—/ke;, rc 4/4i L1yg , tDGE, �/ &/)..e„c46yr .s5, 2‘) 57 S v)a&J �i'� v A' a L�L�� L' �i ' ,3i) c Sr �✓'nciSL.v ( Ocs S ��iLr�bPkin S, It tV ''''' ix.-eui i&ee_c 731,(4),() 30 cot _24}t-eitut --o `-') 6 f5q b ;11.74 _ ( i ---. 11:CA A-- 2 /c9\-t$(0 CC:tee“-° Opfyi- ii g-i)(14, ,-)c . ',Ali ., r,(4w ,t[ r_AL1.-- �� 9 Ai d e_e. LQ ty_e-ri D t l�i (374'ZMc c-(off/ ley Co 83a3t i jos+ (, ?1 W�57Dr �1 v ` /i � ��ez2�y �a6 -j P11 l-d age n n e 0-A- acG kc/, LIA4a Isantit Cat? 51- /.l WE ARE OPPOSED TO THE EXTENSION OF 0 STREET AND THE WIDENING OF 0 STREET FROM US 85 TO SH 257 Name & Signature Address Date 7 / 303 MeudazJ tb!" ? (-65 �Pl. n'j a ES�ICe PG y �q py C,v,1-„d 5or '`' r At, t-19 1R Ji T°114' ,`I aut'.4.,..SI 5o3 o._ v/Jn s o, '7—3 1— '31>— ---)«nc• Me `n /GJLlf 4 198471 e- 75/0.5 `/If '=/ EARL &&`j ,i ' 3Si' 6,25 ie z-c WE ARE OPPOSED TO THE EXTENSION OF 0 STREET AND THE WIDENING OF 0 STREET FROM US 85 TO SH 257 Name & Signature Address Date \-\01/4,t'hev 0(4rns 40SHAAMV6 X65 hawk IV . U-tinn X131 (OW A-P11,6 /d= &_- 05- Pectic k CA* 7/3/ 4/4„ f ic- %A a.-- L., 3S'o 4 _ S ry 4/- Cr c. 4,, 4 i // H i i A ✓JCPiv� b u.) ti. 19!O to fl,/is)O1-e k. 7, , , zazo Gr;ayef,ad Ln Oa 0-5/3i S Thrt (mill.1si CO �S2-lo lm �a�lcne cx1�r� A� ir,a 1fCZre jrocj 3 IMO� I/-e n)o C./c a Af b; ii gook' s bd ; ri dsar, m gc�550 e3j/ 0 yn� / 6re eie y ,'' y% J, C', , j C� /oyes ILTt! 36. 1-k abcet ceo639 "7/0/As ( I-n,.,,- 2126 Maki dvt WIA..4 c 71 (Ass ' OGAttz:W/tzo-yuz-,. , cR / 2.-- 12stet.„6.6-- r / e ( el4exi ie62. i. / :.., //7z c �cn q1 24 ku.tic 7/3/,- C tS,rc la .� Sl^cR ; c� 01") 9z- c-i � edz m . l ( -lIos WE ARE OPPOSED TO THE EXTENSION OF 0 STREET AND THE WIDENING OF 0 STREET FROM US 85 TO SH 257 Name & Signature Address Date (7Pene-i'll114)Kiktityll g- inct,4O g6.4 ---(9i)4t ,/g , Of-F&_____ MY /17k�f.d.d- nty4;l4,1Ya 1� ••1 70 „i �� r�� , . (v63 / strel CLIAikisar Co. % — ci -LN, /'I 32,0s- a/49e)r S star ca v � =�4C' o I Co 1 TetA.:, �'a`24A-cz CO CI • ‘V 3C L) I // /O ei.. 7[/,J/./c5 i ` /6./ %gGr ,47e- 6 „/7/ (are .ir C.7'y -/-'1 ii r V i. )St\,431,, 0jdr24i ') 1S iep fai/15 cf Ct'fi1e193c, L ` -,11 ---20 c t 'idi 7 /cam+�cz.c ��7 1fJ�`��21 4�� /Is ,%Kaki -7 ; Jr' _ , I I BC 67, -lz ax o I/- c yr gr i • _ s Zu'; z ' J�1 `C /lc ficyo1 11,,, , /(z'x .y�: `a „ f -dL —6 5 6/0D4lt ! t-° 3ZSli3 C- a- 7 ) - l i2 c +r- BOYO/ . Vt('-'414/g/ -- 2k/‘•7.4--e/ r 7—/i/. cr, WE ARE OPPOSED TO THE EXTENSION OF 0 STREET AND THE WIDENING OF 0 STREET FROM US 85 TO SH 257 Name & Signature Address Date (, 'c4 i&tiN/1T) 7 :) -//VT) ..,;e‘i 44 77 ' ,c'- /.:'= ?*L . 1"---<--:-I 7--- ) -S- .''f j!(�.t. _ 1;47) it" (14440‘K ,lOg IP ? 3\ - O , <. , r / 747 704-LN 4,. 7.,/ /0 •ti i-r[c'.L/ L ,/ L- -- ;n tJ •..j/LI ,4(:), ( r e.?1-e;I. (1/3/d- / `j/ d- -)-7 , C T i �1 M C7-b P . t-'f)41 '7 ,_CC" �� CIA# OW J 5 T- 3 ds- ?' ( ' /: (" / /1 L I / l• /y 4../),;•:-/ :< • / • % ' .„ ., ox / 4ço ' "95w) ≤3 4/e C 7 ,-3-.D5" . 27' 1 f 4-at d 604 . q OS- "- Cin 4131-e4i6eis qt / '9 & . 61re--•e i q_frz2≤ ' --., - "--E\-'11 a.dtiL l ?--C _...C.)CC-7, P(0,--5U,fri- `'\ Lf Coc 2 ; S. L r- I, n:— --:-.( 1 /'47 ,L,4...t.i...-c-i,--,t-i---) 17 --1....0-4?-t.4.--- *k-{2.q5z; e..:1 1 4 t-41_,,,b-fil :<„,,,,-,...ca_4,1 6/:-...,_,Li, 4,, ".-� /j .-C/7/111. fC= fly.✓ /Z/i/Zre://,'Z1/1 / //—/ %'�' to it41//‘ 7iil e7 /77 %/4 /-- 7 �& fti �� 1 WE ARE OPPOSED TO THE EXTENSION OF O STREET AND THE • WIDENING OF O STREET FROM US 85 TO SH 257 Name & Signature Address / Date (71A B4"lllt"�� i-1?' ' py ii:i 0k_r) ( rm. ITN . -4A) 6-'fecip_i 0(,) 'To{ g--,..-)-3C: 27,- Pf-1- TY1 ,p, ,6,-,,,.„ rte' A E,, ,, E l F , Aag ?-7-' � g;�_ .os-- a ,c , .\: r;1LAQ \\SS \-\ n' \,k OQ, k&' iu e dos Vy g,cJ6'''''' V (, .i'ri.t.iirli r,4Diky I 5.1 3 a' IV I ie- ,k7 ./JejtC, -)1/(76.: . )2 U) D _ .A.ita_ccif l3 a 3 Q wcia,BP fi-liece C0 S'06,9 A _ . ikkiiii.GQ, -;-,tie )4_ ..6:t-).)0 Pi re br Ldivvelf)eir,Co go c7- , i() h' l '•---(,. . .14 .L:(47)( *--i- -7-7:5 107---t 1,3`, uctoicl _ eit„ V) - _)-V J e.":-.e- ; -- ) e}f-v(Wt 31913 vv c- �- -e 2" [. i / a. C . A;O-1.--- - -2)413 pvic_2 c-vc..:L.. e.t..1 ,c,c, ,,7-., , -:- . / - (/ i". 1 ' 4 'rf. )1U(' 1 [n—I U\i . )1 ‘. .51'1Cir(ts, 141- ' CO C- '1‘..'d .,� (7-7,-----3... -- (.54(c t�1I-N k_ I-(\1 Gi l-tee:c"-kJ cfi 'c'r,A WE ARE OPPOSED TO THE EXTENSION OF 0 STREET AND THE WIDENING OF 0 STREET FROM US 85 TO SH 257 Name & Signature Address Date i>'/ii `"./ %,.:.,2-.;/..; r/ /' / / • -I.---' C:ri , t....( (.., r r r' Zi--'(4 . . . ; / ;,, . T r { ( . 0 r2., (.1:k _ t —i . �: \ . (LS • ?yam - 2 y2, 1 � 3 z_ L , 7 - ) 77, S S I sr` /" 7' --/- -' aLC i 37 06411/41(1 &P-kiitilyhzi) .88..z iv. iliii-J_SLE d tipl Mte&54/121/e5 ' C-Avt-LII _ -111rtk_' _ ,v ttcV-1--1 L21 -10eV.Wooll ht. (AI s . 6i. 6 (, t J21-. 7 Al;..',-ihc. 6 I 11g1-3--lfl€ 4 ,4.a.. r tc-'6314 7,00 .7)z,"\_-,-1-- v i/72.. - 1----, //py -• Li/ ,----._..L_ _,&,,..,_.-- _ co •c•4 L/ t 1Lcv ,1(.0.. . � y +•L fl i ri .'2/ n a / �. Ill ' k{r. /S6‘:-.5/ .,,.../.(i.11111,4" /..)2L'it C- .6--I 1,t��/!1ecl '/I71i ti.502 (cl --e),5 WE ARE OPPOSED TO THE EXTENSION OF 0 STREET AND THE WIDENING OF 0 STREET FROM US 85 TO SH 257 Name & Signature Address Date -iv j Lq KtAxttric, /551 la-7C/n-7 LT A', idscr[ C -,J -LJ J t/ G/(7 L.Ir zlu X1,1 7aUCIt: '/ 1 f Gc Q-nV4u A-1ki. ,L/1twmika, 3 . is 1-41LSL 4t 3 6 rce\, gAve5 /LT, --wit4 inciAlLexi-e.sz &fee-Lc-7y sit Vcc- it Pci iv-) 31 b/ (0- Le.# 67-/3- 6s He; atebe /Vfiuye ' ago To IP*: .xv , Co /3/v3 i1 tI Yt' KWigw ahr, sti coo) 35`'yew& Ct eteLitt, 2-4 `{ - o 1' `'r p(iin 1 f3k, fg rdc/� to V 4 Co 3O6 s / ''2 (6 - ' - K • (724-Q__„, 0 / a 6,14-c--,t- efrad F tct.,,,i) 0 () `I 6 6),0 � J7--1 _2(111A/C. 2-(-e---- = G / ( AI PD ± riA—N ,, 66 �/ .� r �� ( G2te �2uti,.�/� �J�i,,...� 3Y6 � Cep 13 �7 i1� c � t . �� , 73is'7oF ,Di 6 -7-1.-1:10,- era (Mar (6. 33 'la3 ctidRa ? 6r -�loy �'D63r � p 191 5. ypli i ., /�u o ' - 4144 let-'. cl 5 O o6,3,7z WE ARE OPPOSED TO THE EXTENSION OF O STREET AND THE WIDENING OF O STREET FROM US 85 TO SH 257 Name & Signature Address Date ' {'a4e._ -- 'd //c2 - g9"ideil O'ILAItip al/0)0.5- -2- ''` 1V1-ii i/1 4/e) PI, 'f,' 1uCISS J. 64, P-I 0 ` — 11- /-4---Callii; z4" / &- 0-/0 --(3 --- ,---) i, f ' J '' 177 //;_7 • <-//h�,, 1_,, ,, / �/' ., ,, �/4& /)n,_ \JI - /C' Li �f / 7' ' C,C;',.\c,.,36-d ,i- 12, ,(-1't- C4-,-,.,w,ti_}-eiq 3,1 5 4i,z1 i ci i- 3 - re -°- '' '' CJ-L ' Qi G. ,c-l'• styeek A, t -(..)- 8 .... i ii) -ci 7- L2 c-(-0 4-t)--• 1i:Akcion of- � �� 2,- , 1DizosATTbuyA 64 ) 1�cv w �v �Se6-3=) / ' // `Y ?� ' , (1 V,=- 17/.112 sue,- . ?2W 3 _. `'r' i ',c4 / .,7._.-?c, ��cis, G Gfre6: % Co 40E,, / . /:D o c J ? F` Y2.7rrlcr . -X2/1/....2 %4 k 6 1-0:-.4e 1�.6 -d kl, C., M [ -/_2-C�`^ '----------7/2--: Z / c 3/ $vim l/u1 nvtso r, C'O gQS.sz' . '-/.,2--c c' ;?/ «.,.�Z,..., M �1L3',i-- 4-`7 n b)t`r'I Cl501- C 6 g;05.-5--c, g -f•2".;,,,') ' 4 4 . tO; i 62) X65 O G We are opposed to the 0 Street Extension and Widening between Hwy 85 and Hwy 257 Name Signature Address Date (Print Name) ' �xz / '�3 ,�,j,P�.� �,��cS22/-5K-77.2,<,te/ rrn - ii 103,2,4 enake RAid C 2u'-AL'ri4i /vcL tail-11i; I ✓,>,4utui ,Ps :,, //G7 2r4/ c, ,c_ r �� /c 5 l er�; � ,�� , Nti S`151,1313,ig ©ce VA- Co\v ,viv - cj tin 1)- • m(Q) l//rarn `> '1,Q, k M(oc;L L 'in65ciL Sio..1sL 17 77,,v' - C, A e4 V'v Q. & zKcL. halo Lu 7 ii .)1- 3 ,2-es" - / V2eell---)/--- Ke O r,� o , A.3 27I 1\,; , cif tci , -/F'24.---;)2-tri .:47-----7-i P---, 1-ec- I: e_ 04 u ,- Lis I Lie; 5 5 - /1-t. Z,,,r cc/. ' 'M dC.c,/-cyt ( ( ��i zzz.Ft 4{ s r IQ/ft/Wog Co MA '1' , ' ryO3,(31,,6 ��( _,9.4 n \1L \c--)c SL L�M'(G. 2 -> J Sm TA 'AI- `d :--.F -0j C, "t) t / I JG fc Oct,e ' (A 5775-- w, pi Pi 51 h/vek to ro6/4 Y - 7' WE ARE OPPOSED TO THE EXTENSION OF 0 STREET AND THE WIDENING OF 0 STREET FROM US 85 TO SH 257 Name & Signature Address Date , g-b-o Sr ?,3 11 c. (,T l&S scitit ail 2-70O &. C41"61 6-144 Co " ;1 2 4,1 e/ c't-eg5 -� �� . /oat, Lc=(zvicf . kieie( gyCs{Cu e 4oJ4"K0-1•re 1:�ws S®r Cl szos-3.0 i/451,.„, S'iteinin, / tc 74e21-4_,...% at Liz t124,4,-rrf 4slr 6 gt74 C �' � ^ f/ � // n p r )ilu-iSIP. \�( 1nnn filer 1166tAGC.c-u.ii,r,ll al4Z �-Ili,c'li- Flree /ry a"3t6 3'f &I/ _£r/ztne,..7 3/h1gSl,7c2 --, / 6rt< iy re cro & _ 34 Z:-/ :-.,,c-s--1,, li -•rct7' /1337 . ecr,9 7/..f f tCJ 4. rDsZe/s ?o _C cd C c i Si 7` /fl Gam( 7, Sc%ti a-' or is 3" J�&Vtvt2 - -C i ws`► Pan vci5P 11' Wivtd ov 505- 5b 'z'a-15jr-f4,-„0:4 -It g3 /. s0tt,-6,1y3 , , , r,„ , .,... i.,,,t, tit ...,.., 7),:.) v .3: J ! A 0- a. ..' 1(:),,-cr-,c' l c iii ri. 27 , ,,, r Cl/ 6 l / APT C - -;.:f r / -3? • 'k �. - r 137 4/ 2j s%f-c/t CL(c ,ry co Pei 3/ 4 �/a4 ��y di We are opposed to the O Street Extension and Widening between Hwy 85 and Hwy 257 Name Signature Address Date (Print Name) '2cf NJil,ne CA-,,, bet ( I11/4 nn ) f6. 1 Oz- ,5I1 12,4A-4-,, V- xi/a xi/a ao l; cc,; _ `' ,„er' f�e�e 1 -C� Till 1 05 , . e-r1-1Cr\r5Tje r2 '3/ (C-#4/ivi ') J ; LC iitC1-./) .:c, 4,„ lE _ (.2 e ez, O S L &-x; R A .M c.C j� 4 el b �'. is c� rlc� ^c n n C n & kr i ' rnati ,t -ee_l C'1 1 g `�`LZ 3' 3-Aeso.1NA,ede 1,A4.61,7 407 Vi!,9T'5-\,'Kd Aireeley , CO 80631/4/ -105 (d VIJ/1 'V !%/(,� >k III {/y 7 / i 5.7G t a/17-t�� &. 14 ,e S-Ys 'cc? :kr1 ) Y lG•ic✓,6C ,/iv d—, /0A-4 id. D; -5/.3 PAL iect<„, (!.'cfz 7/7-1-_-_ir) . , 7 dilt f ols,r a r� e JAY,,C.--C <L/f N(��N GEC.... � // /s/45 x,.,,� C`J�nrL dJts'.� �,�� l�/ f�,:� y�t� 3i 3� A�a �6�.c.�/ `� //�/, i / ] z; 1 .11 IL'1 r y 1?-1GGiw y WE ARE OPPOSED TO THE EXTENSION OF 0 STREET AND THE WIDENING OF 0 STREET FROM US 85 TO SH 257 Name & Signature Address Date ,,,4 $ d_ /n. /7a / „ l 4(.4(,c • °5- 57l' a e' %,c)e. 02,1 Z1 7 )' v-e l ki lc23 (c.,\„,, --\;„A64001,_ i *,--,,,, h,_,,_ 24___ .--v2, 7,, - '�Z 6 - Cc-1.umnti l g'0 sr 3l 4„—, ? 27-aC f & “5 )J04 7 - 31 -05- i)01 easte x. . ioaep, / 9 yl 4-4-t f' aP . 7 - 3i - 0o' 3`''' ACouly P 7 /did l c 7 - ; 6_, , , 414 a - ,2/5/72±-7- .,;. ,- _ HO/ A 4-hAneino_ /60 i Sta eAie 4U °Y/dl igs 3rd' � ,� 7"..3 a7 W ) ) 5r 7//33/5 tn 7 ( ��) 77 // , sii. 4(1/4 S o M iiitm 3 30I k) 234 St— -/ 131 (0 ----- -y,I - 1 �r S ) ail 3 L.( a4 -7 5/ s .1/4i [%r a 4La (! I d j rz-f'm Fine p "v+; - ?d 115/(05- e .d We are opposed to the 0 Street Extension and Widening between Hwy 85 and Hwy 257 Name Signature Address Date (Print Name) - -2 3)12 O, t11' (�r , CO 8izo31 �S1-7s/,�c�?5 �-eI �-- ��'�k�� Kris-ten �(OSh k(w i i�(z7o c o au. rn. - - " ;' f f ,s� a in ez) gabµ 03/(1: c4. )) (.6 4 (ifr1 //At extra /T3e • .�C/, l52l 4k 2 &at ('c `lob31 L /3 anti ( i I . 777 . �.v .-- � ., S� �', u(e� C'�� V�/Y WE ARE OPPOSED TO THE EXTENSION OF 0 STREET AND THE WIDENING OF 0 STREET FROM US 85 TO SH 257 Name & Signatur Address Date ' 4 Q ( ��5 I M� / yilS /8 65 r Q2)-O(„ 3 1 V 3)745 -3--7{ , ,ura_ ;,1 SS60 7 ki ce So Aivrtteg Sag -F/„i-- ,60¢,,,.Q Q . X a 970 hL ( ._ C Co eb G,t5 Alls: tip c -: ./ cj ;2670a / X.6/J o G 3(> -eel& Lv kO6V 8/0s- (/ Ito �� C o`Z. `�ef9J Mrt� al3 co 7-3 aS .�c� a 75a-G J -7- 3r-o5 -X-a---/-7e-a 22-' Sa-ct./ /lo600 plcu��u-n Rd /--e -u - OY-oe-(reo ;D!et 5- C;Es- � .. ..6".S- f �Lict-t-4- q`4 rts'. om'Cet5 7-- '172 1.r;s ,k-H-c " C 'Po ebc 34J Ev-G....-4 Cc UI.R V Cam/ 113, 103 r," nwk 66 4 a (74..4 civil) / C 1 e;u.ti �t L�i.i cJr -l� :/iii 7--Of- , O� % `' ��:,�,�—f_f 7f,/.1u / c� e/ — //a/. / d.°e 1-I--ds• `::l iD 3e,-niec e l :-ktel( ( bko,,i,.c.e.,4, /lr; n1DQ is??? cuete a7 eatm-5, ay 70 � ;CI. G y s 3 AJ�,,,le . I' /f ��3g.-_� -� d/iiiikaan 2// c %1/c//e t s%s' WE ARE NOT IN FAVOR OF THE 0 ST. EXTENSION Name Address Date PoQa�l s" n - Arm- . D. wcR 70 E�}o Co o'7-2L-o5 3(/`€) CS Q/ f`7� Gte jo SY 7--t1�-®.a u�n_r 1T J-1 Nt r of 1[ggwc�z� ilia A ip•M to •� la / ,J, . ing h EI- 5 U9! but S- .,,.,, J,�; nJ./2p % cerkc( /'_3 d/4/Jag .73 %� ni f.)c S7 7457-q() 2 e5 ` ir/u�-/iJ , at,07 W )21:h: St. 80‘54TA,/as- '-)'la. . e. s yr 7 to 1 g'of.&- ,` to.b a 9. 7pa jo 5--- .(;<i' -, �j I '4 29byw,i Srfu> ckatcy 9043`( 1136) 05 `' IM6& e_ 2K /40g Slver000d (4- (Ay/LeRoy, goSso 8'f((as --C, -,.. Ce•4-4 ILI A Cdnr..unn a r_T Wilt d cell- gnSth 4-4.a/1.4;) a�a✓iti0 s SI7 FLfit $4 WM)b5d/C 9V Lr3O Ey/105 (AM.¢s % oMMrk ,Ir Sr , r/Nisi lvr/Idsa,, '36sso R/IA5 <<: ., i! ' 66 . ',• - t'r. ra, 5-97- !� — ' t/ J _ _ • - r,, / C',6 ri'lh.41_ 5a 35"n Ca dcccic.ci e-.-, -U c iL-4 Z4 Z 7 /63so 4.J ccc 4 "2-47.2Z) r , Y 2 .‘1 s � �Lr.s / . a3 ii /- se _ ; r. ??-pS ,- - 3 ?Jan.' f a 15 Pi-9 r vi ,. . .� t Iy �/' .. . Cc . i P .S v.r nri _ 00 0 qi a - 9 3 or AY L i , /. i 'e . , / liter,p 2 '-!�. i I �7+ CMRt L :` ti..! 9,S8 LS- 7 thit.tE s4 'az. 6/53/0 Q-42 4' WE ARE NOT IN FAVOR OF THE 0 ST. EXTENSION Name Address Date `1(' 14 L, le z Ma et, a.v in 207- / 3c Ao4, J— /2 o ,/;?t - " ce .� . � 1 ' G - _'o• r yi ea. _O. �i' ' .. ✓' j' _ , - Cyr - i C.V- .23 / 'i t O-D-te-!r - -DC a ra , I /' r/ " ' _! - e.._ /9%G .Z Sw S / WE ARE NOT IN FAVOR OF THE 0 ST. EXTENSION N Address a Date 47-1 16217 ally 5T inTo'v 7-aE/--os ( - ,cei C- I 7 -05 , ,i 1Ak D 41-v ti,(1 tsa c_04 flluc-t-)4 U)knds i - (c-LS- C L .. _c y / •. -- — a s- mil,.,. ;- .se.r 7-4-o S 3z i . - ! . = /I ! bLi 1 P 339e9 tact .) 6k-i 7 f ;;� w z vas /�7 / 4,„c, le- e JW; � •i�il7i 1`7.4,4 e . / �/ q2o set...44 eii.".yes-4 7/y/6J_ 46 I 3./L4�/v�..-,t, // X.,---. z t 7 5 J"/t. 3Y Prt/,r 7171 a . -5" Lice__ /3 L C_ 7 3/as r f ti., rn1�^C In + vim "2. 1 q �YYc ' rr'Z;p�C" 7-7-7j- „t. .7_ 7`GS- - .fklli---mY,1� 413 SSte, lnco (---, ? '7- 0S - ©S Or-2 1 � .i,i-• Si? I u yea' lvil,. DJ'U7C c-O ?-7 p� "mil `ftW.v,' Q me 0r- e.33-e:ciu r\eQ cc) 'I 4r-(?S_" I'vit 4[(AniseA U9 . O J-oS- /'' 74 .t.;� Ser/er ,w�P '(O 7- 7-4S WE ARE NOT IN FAVOR OF THE 0 ST. EXTENSION 1-00 fin g5 60 s2s- one LoH road Name Address Date /i.1cA4SA-0-W- — ilt-H /lir -I/LC- a,-n,.J o 7 Sat RothiCketk,e‘C.• 4- i - S — 3ga4 J .4LIZ-13 pa, 204,4- cIck try',.1 I0 ��f`'iGE3WC� t ete � , — c�0c3 (?'CC C.-Natoli ttwitei r$73 Qcit •21 c. 0 en cs ka r^ AAA Am - 7 1i T a ff 11 �.1d�avi Co SW° 61 ‘ * ,— ., .4, y0/1 corn/ c,VCT t , ' Mor, gos �`°s' 0 -- e �1�i 7- v SAL-,. ` ' W 1 u id D ` SS� ao 7>1 i0/6S n c a st an t k t?ri PU fl. FV Rt3S e 0 1-/-10 055 326$3,�G /2t 4/-- .A f _ 7-ye-0c ' am U-� uV /US Ufi� IW erZ1hWL cam'" 7-10-v i ' ( . ?t (6q, ,, R frf)I(iYIovkPtc)Oh veils rn CC) 1- Ios• '' '�' ' ` �}�'��1(Q_'1i7.'Q�1 qq. ' Wt \I t va sejia'atccCO7-/n -OS- - ,-- - tine :n(4 , 1 * c_tk �-r0 0-224. twtc. -7 i 12405 ( ;; , > ,( c�`%I .,ttc 520 It�4'1A ive 11zlt �eF /279i- were 74, E.o-4nY.. c4 7 /2 or 31° Uw4--fri aq.. .SPsx4.ge,,(O. -7/1Z/4I 53S 1C . -•t- 1€ Ake Art al/ere-eve Cr) eav s'fc-, 11 t/Or -i . ', G. • ! �y if C.cu'u c.:,cv�l • c2 v-eu;,Lc u. . 6D 3�: t i 101 • O tV ?QIIX 0 X151 co 2cP L-1• 0v CO ' I/16A r op() rs. n, f • • ' -i ( i rc lL CC•_ 11'0 50 (4°5 C_ ./7 `-)I a-kJ , ) i (A X Q-Z`\ `re--l-r. r L0 .' -c v •47r4, Tg -el'2_ 33* 71 ,,,, c/? ? ? 5:,-17,.., 7 - 17-0J— WE ARE OPPOSED TO THE EXTENSION OF 0 STREET AND THE WIDENING OF 0 STREET FROM US 85 TO SH 257 Name & Signature Address Date j, 36ap ≤d/o%.? S/Eda s 7- 7Y as- 37,_.)-37 (kick (13 AvAf 8°x/0 -7-aq-a5— a/Y A/if_/ FS 1/. nstikaseithigetsCo' . fv/3r 7-02f--)0 n gs(,lo Ug 1S s Cain- Gila., ,1 ." (s, 1-24-LS ,1'h Savo)) Sap/ tocP. a7K ,rc) Io!5 'a.29• 25 y,r la a7a (a C147 ( ap 7 C29 L,., Lite e in 1 L'o grab///O 7 _ 2 O.� /� q �.cetice., co cam, (� . X 4//90-9 WC/f 90 , 2,Db.sv /A0.5— 1 *A4Ati. e ' e Cro Colds- lzilor vnsicx.7V 5,0-442-n, 41, 1 s�ze k 7t -t-t na G 'f? 777/1a- r 2__ Q33 c.0 . 3 se Cdr _.cji c /4,78,,z co c R '5'3 /-O(lira-, eV V1lv1l-e., WE ARE OPPOSED TO THE EXTENSION OF 0 STREET AND THE WIDENING OF 0 STREET FROM US 85 TO SH 257 Name & Signature Address Date Y� 67(tcp - / - fricarl Azz.teno/Azteci. 7cA-- , i d • ,idia„.(2 ,‘ Lador,ocit, .,:tastzat. 7/.29/ .5- a,/L,t,( idA44,4-n- o20.1?0p cicri 7-A7-Os cIn c r « x, /7_..,____O co, 6 r - c,2 o GEC U CI A '�'�-c t G fi 76 7 L0-0u, 7� ?44 - ' bar-ti ' cz3V cc.27 ,,,ce, ri/27/O sr D [Tnq 3 Z Cc' -�/2f -ar- e Alin &dee ‘ 4-2 '// go G&& 7/9'4/ 7 -a,-or- 7---.2-9-0!` �% rn 9o33 �� .d-,/ C� dfl ' Orilt ylizat 01D33 07G It hi. [4a0 •2liez,j, cg SD631 -/ i—, M-3 /7 /s ic. , } <; ;3_,,,,,AN,AA7 \ \ l iiio i i. Tag-of-C.ya 7 . 4 �g ,e, c'c�6Zo WE ARE OPPOSED TO THE EXTENSION OF 0 STREET AND THE WIDENING OF 0 STREET FROM US 85 TO SH 257 7N e & Signature� Address Date y 71(0 6u r d�-c* -P al 0 7 .z i/o S- J 00f g /y/s hid-ter 224 2-5-33y W c-/2 G a�Z .772-0 J-- &)h U1; 1,K.,,A) (2 '7-3s''404-0 CI . Greelecj ?- aq - os heustr a c, „,, , , D l GPtA 1d 3 7/xq/ <. 1 -41,.._o_42 at, gaiA „,.` )W fl were Iii 5a.l 7`0,9-`a s- :,y it 9/�Q�,(�/7 t"'fit " DiN(� „.... ,,,Aani/ l / 0 4 ��i1. 2y/ " " O!f-,6 a274"oI #O11 rre61 - LV kC1.K1 -7-29 -fT, j`1. 76,00 P/4e4v R2 eta, 7121 .7 /409 .x.4, ,0 64 i/a9lo,� . @c 6--K.c RI 1/02-1444-4.,_ 3337 `L_anM/Sea Evy,Ks dotvAt jitte,4 So/ at0 ' iti4Ve_ Cr C uj 7APO/as -ats " OA `6405 We are opposed to the 0 Street Extension and Widening between Hwy 85 and Hwy 257 Name Signature Address Date (Print Name) Ong- LJY 3 �i,�! A C S340414uLe 7 D c ' 1. 7 . c3� / zcJ AYr .≥d o 208 . kee :9. 7 3o--mss" ri, L aGd 4 1 �2.2g esD _ 7-2c) 05 - Po Poonn So h ns e n ss, I W . l 0 s-i- Li 7i3o i ti L,≥ 1- 11 poi) a /&07 inic'e r0 7/3o/os ��,( i fro /J =`" Iu � N/A�^i AnA"Q7 Ze- -. 4Q1.90 0 6 / /3 7-30 /0 E 4`' a,t- / 40r.1 M. /Llea4DHI Q.r.ra..9 M. 327tt WCe.171./' .7 1 Ilea / -3a -o$ y��Y7� C r 4/17c I �o�@ax lcy 7 20 I, ` 4> `0 1 K 03 6.9453 �"^' & 24a/.r ^f ri Lee z 2S' &L 1 77x _,, Da✓Ltzhe. r,' L &e cOa P/. A_ a�.S i� sC r , , , Alitai L nito e r dick l/��" _ 33% l.3 £`t sm,r cs&4ei7� ) I�ANz l ia2 L �LJ2/ tJog� lllo ��'�e�"o 32 I q-S Ea 5 J,-.? I 6.23qe 012_.w/go . rC VIO c5 - �-v 7S1 6 (c) gcc a999j we la 45 '4r /7cY L . Ge; h '?'/7- t G'.0 r o goticii/ 717A-sr 3-'' b S4- 66 l doc..) ,uv{r S 0/3alos We are opposed to the 0 Street Extension and Widening between Hwy 85 and Hwy 257 Name Signature Address Date (Print Name) 4"' Pgrric k J 04klo� H„ts si3 I V 2 911 ff 7/7//U. ii, (-t-e4ler, cc roc-39 ,Ps end4 LD't \Sxn 2 G w� „goo c r ,k co --)�,3iA,; , 7`�`' ` A 0,4504) -ASP s ilsoP J 1, it/0Y L r' ' QTf1L,q, SQ- bfl C-- .‘s,;<-. \\A 141 V3, 21 &A- 7)3\ U_ V 0_v ?2,0 ��riie-C r, Y3/ 4 .,,p,p ;1{, y. P/ (7 �� 320 *id,r, .1nv/ ?Ai o le,1 (f is 515 rr 3* 11- eire 6• 7 s� �S `" ka(a i; /It 77�+,o .k Sis/*ini3 Zire_eley, 0lb��`-8 71 � f� a r ''W r}-`C' c:),-093, l 'g-a' l Pei , g,3) I u3clz-7 V Fcdbv &) 'lic '•1Cr k4z‘ talk \- P $z ,, �-o inn C 1� �r� li i 7✓4i GIn,r p, Q Vn /Dses J ( Attic. tittoa €.1(0o4L . „ I,C � ff// // pct n / :onto I ('lg j&/D VrLL ,geo L �! ! s ' ' '? l`j.e 4y Co�6'✓>n 003- 637-c Goo..\. Ii ��I.9AP 5Chi-. 1k ) 3Y WCP, -1D a.atn,, , ('A cckcuN vSv-3(2 3 Sc.,Anawm✓k / 18'? 341 c.✓c-M 7(0 Fw.Fon' , Go Sr06,/ r `IS cf.)2 nAi3/4 O., �,,, 6 / io l 6-)C AD Ll C n Co pogi 6'P�—.s'Y ;m_' 1 ,�5 ` /�i, /o de .,0- R L-SO‘.)/ 3 5 ln«� .(2 �: � ,5 I 4, 1 � ,,2R &� i °LWW -713//' J We are opposed to the 0 Street Extension and Widening between Hwy 85 and Hwy 257 Name Signature Address Date (Print Name) C. ' - C CO 7 ` -QS— S 7-Y6 as Co -1 - 30 - 0s" 0 04 1 t+&u cae S j 1t- ,- . I:1? _ C., 7 - 30 -c-c x' 6 kaCt Laee r Gain-e tel-ern 7 r36 - bC ,5-i 3+,4_, /4771-0T '" 7n�N cN Eit. - &t r. co en6_ey 7 MI( -or *)` Karen (c J itin01 .San ) PrcziAt C°- i27GLS 7 3Attf ',,DD A/A ? Li L/ !fie-...a , 9e,, i/- e::-� C°z� F06/5- 7-3/-06-- ."t CAE L, W o LF g .,c/a-1/ ,.10�� Co iaQ is 7 -31-CS `' oncticl i'e_ ` Y tom- 39 oq W215.351 , Qeetey.Cp .stes 9 1.3 5 -eUe /`)Q khrK�S V /tr.,.e_ -. 3J (2-35 O4+ CI- cell/27 7-3` -°� ' Ch ri sfr vtr~ k. Iko_c.r, s CiiLo :rie-mir /a dr.,- 799Se 'CLetr 7-.31-4)6- ';" b Zc - Kititg t, ill) Cr '<I CI F-,c,R. o•'�Z 7 -31, s, 7..k/ wt -LA kvtr\) \ebeir X22(2 W. 11-\1-15-ii G19avN 4-,31-0r- IA4 a� J Cr Grm/4,1✓e. /kJ,K isSnc 380 . vD ' nice ;/,, 4/1/.25v E /b� -c "�.�&, K(tgek ShArmn I<Grat,,hain eenlsha cn g,29q3 ``.- IZt f lei.Ss 6oeigi, Co 7,601 7-3L^!<" WANT TO KEEP UP WITH 0 STREET INFORMATION-GIVE US YO E-MAIL ADDRESS. � i'lLiciptiroic ,^„Q,, a ., lqv :1 Si• cr-e 1.2/ a ?"a6 3, ..thi- - -,-...tac-,_, til 9. - cy,cLe5i- ileme..7, 4). Fob z--fre-- 8.3.,_,„a?�� /262 5/ c cfl s8 pferrc,e C , io65o . -`'r /fl,� / 909, 3 4..../c„4. s 5'. cL c c . 80 , ,,„ la)11Cn1`1Ut* 33 4-1 )c1 s G, 1), co stio4 r ? tie(' 1 7Co1F �C Mein, Co 7OCP J cr 97 L o n 3t4<pcA tA .c . RA . Avo viers CI3 tudiAt /tQ,; i l/ 44ev 55655t'cR Iay Groocr/ Co 7107A9 cl vcCALQ-Al.Q. VAi 1/4-v. 5clo5S W02- 12-`k 6.e0.,e.r, Co S019-1 Co76-1.�fAl Ju.tim. tar /"a Lk , reX,Th Loll C 5.c r.0.41- G-r-Q aD i °LQ1 50(0-7-0 (e,ll e.41Y Qaisleki 5P-t4 Avexyelrivw C.hn , Co ?(21005 "'5161"1., cc WCQt 1 1,"/° t' V G(tfi/1„' W /-Lt Ylit3 )3 due 6 ee V 9(JG, / 1 6") etn e w2ee /a r (9/00 r /d'`' Sit, rreelp, Co L 7 003( ';` ta.d.:-t-4 4Liti-sli0 3-201a U r k 77 ali., CI kThOG ski— ' 1 14:00.? `%" 44 -a .4_.. 3-7 .H Lut t //3- 6a ./ *4ur1LEa..co 9074E ,' 7 ot�i,, v 11 9.0frS�rGC'r Greeley co to/i1 ' 'l.' C (7/l o S talk i4v e_ Q tz.zus i1 Eo Sob 3 1 WANT TO KEEP UP WITH 0 STREET INFORIVIATION-GIVE US YOUR E-MAIL ADDRESS. 16 74. 30 5t; UZ6z2 C CC 06 'f g 6/5 to i1is go .co /e) a p476 46 I 5 r ver_i, co ¶04 3fre i3 FT �vs72y i. G�Ij► _ ZO (id r / as f i St : l UIc( i Ir' Cu CfLYO3 We are opposed to the 0 Street Extension and Widening between Hwy 85 and Hwy 257 Name Signature Address Date (Print Name) n0 130/9,,, i An n e aci S i,ii- > Aar ccl . /We rya- K/tT J?G? 230,e_ 'l 7 9 /�/Zac eo ec.2s-Y 2 u.-/-O �f 7 „reeky C0 , {,, /‘;?A ie.ane e M-e s /.c,,�1Vk ,h, Z Z i48 �b.? !`r Ifr , ��"U' S7h / 7// f/r--s-'4w&/6 � a) aa63 c-t"1 CF CA-4-� /L1 zs t4 t c L /‘,' 2 i9r`Xrt cC S7 " doaro -1-- , rrsn¢r, >vfmr7.�2 :✓ /3//7/9 Tliiy / vdid ,S7‘,/0 ci n 55/- r . - `res ..e/y -3r- , ,e-i --y, /3 it/q Sko j i i /1rio/ Sj o ‘% 3 KF,Aloii ész i ///Si //i Y i ta- p, 14;}0,„ Meg s a .4 /0. ;75 ii as iti"-' Ac -t Fite ;.7f y17 , ;��.....t_c � ad? /J /7 ,1! t tv-AG1z-ices, l °? Alit2z.di:,- 3 d °;2- v) . SP"Zitn Ile,/ /4 03 'A-4 �.,,y j 1 o a /t �,. S/ -,J <Q- tio .�. C.i t4-42-49-10 , Pr) Karen ✓Berr y kto -k,) �: 2102a Isr S1--. ✓f.c� 6re tte/A &03H b / // ' Wad eo- 8 l� '", 'e y Tr rL�T/ �! 72vo E. N �� I� Z3ia!<<ht 4i . J4/ T z“' )7 2 ); �l - IC- T, /i zfli`A e i �t-tti : 0041 - -,-49 l� Ai --��;4/\ to 4 k Ave b 0J.'''~ ill tekeckQ_q-�e1 Vii- C i-t--I ( k�� `�c--C Q %. �- j� J /� )',� H7l`( 15t f "E'cPfle_kay /O U WE ARE NOT IN FAVOR OF THE 0 ST. EXTENSION Name Address Date \ :',n &'W -. arty 400 c\o `f- Have GrePl Py 3y 7/07/03 ,e„� NIAM v �iz,c(� A017 4,8f` (' �/3� -7/7/C ,,iy T uN pp C�� W� 4��5'��,'� I )/)(�� (II u Avr neverr nc'r - S©i ` 1 / /71oS r 5 t,: nc tt j eL:- k4(OGs, . iD .3i, milk /&n -7 I-2l \- 5' ,e 1 ; - .( ,� .3 Pi ,� CQLke4,-. . ., —7- 7 -0 ; 4Pt 4aL-<s?flt-t Co , 0- s -0s— L.-‘' if:kit //4;va Fey >Laeo.1/"fldu v17 7- -7 -c5 . • !,r E- 'cca4e /c Z.!J._.f-. i2.5" 9 .cmeci/a .f414.91 7'-7- C s D ,/ e � 115-4' 4'V � _ . �' Tao or t1Z -Lttw:h ___ -1 a �/ f 5 1Y ,,, 3 f'.%?rim c ? r C&4'/ Cr- -7,.,,,,,,, ,'c i.' . :( _71J ,./7. /,& zit' d , / S, j/ z < 6 /Ll ST--,)S y�/ Y I)ya,�',(al0', /j)-- r,Lihdctl l/1J/0 �_ r : ELI 4Sh-,5E W,OC± � }/ili )) A:14114:1:11C-ItHei"?:: 12, 1--A''S. �/�—jam ,2Z2 £j c>/ OVA,--T-e-f.5 WE ARE NOT IN FAVOR OF THE 0 ST. EXTENSION Name Address Date ./, 7 .l .ace)3 ,; 4c2)7(2S4 YtSSO —5--as- %" �. fpt.) .r08 end .C'!. t..,erz ry ('o (6,516 .7—6 cS rD.� - /7 goy 4k23y-c oI 6, 8O6c1 ---7-c- or 7".' yL525 N 977 //74--61 [:-.-7( CO 7 42-055- 9 z i (Ai C. ' zc> ' .3/ 7/cri G" a ;r, iv i/%L off.At/ cfad3> n .ii��%1 �i 1 ,, ; ' ," ) 12#iI IZ Q- hq'k.> C* . .. CO 8.4 3' -1 u/oc' 12(rcI LC*2- tcY')2— -,7co0 ) �'�"> & 1n 31 -1 ( OS-- 4:: ' \1ti v ,44 ucJL5Z 04 7',. 0frau1et (6.:(., S t3 ( 7-to -O �� 4€ c-12 - 4,5-179 14'L/2- G ,e C4 rro& ( 77670 3i‘tl Lv'cg- 1 o„/6¢ - -C-C2 63, -1-y. -c . ..-psi (// ! - e 1 --Pe .iy 7-1-, . _. �' � ' a i 7 sr - ,L a t• . O C 4 ' 7-6--C_S- ,t'tmil s .%L ' Ii ' , ) • 6C,3i 'Iv. ) C4cc/i.A,e $ gSo52AJe, ca .\ --.\\ (�v_et. C- C;`39j "-�f3� 2 en, h 1 ?Art 2.-9. 1.-7 / !/1/ ti� ;(k? JdA/1sOI'\ 2,2/ng wr,Q.4s Fthx) l}z 'C6A-' <1icz o/ '01-' ( .)47, k44 � .,40"7 /. 7741 51-.C67l,-/ 5Ub 7 Li 7--7 OS �+-� 11, + 4ctc a. yl4"J}- k-,C W'ioiLI T-1I, c5 ^ ,„ , ii 33 1. ani- ec-o-c- ae co' to Al s 7_a i -°-s �� X s2, r l 9o1 Jc' 2 Z� ��7`f, C' �rj Is -7--,. ‘ -as 7 ' �� S,' v .5 Ut 0 67/ s ..-7---;'6 e..1 L !j 7d47 yj/ e' / 0k- >( K 5-� 7,,2.z ,„,)- '7(') ( c),.,.a x�,(2,,,4_,„,,,, ._'5a'/ c41"/ ...?....5-7 ///..✓/ , , ,-Ya,5`z 5/ y. -7/ e �y` c i . L(1' , 1..- 'Jet/ ,,%! ACi5:Y S5.l /i ,e-1t_, ,-4,,_,4O .7 .. 6 . � -7Cfs)'"i�-L %C_ 7a' �t�.r� sz. lk.v� 3.567S GL)C E 4?o / ,c.Ba4u2g,UJ�:�'00•513 -, �6r 30.E 73,2 -tiS WE ARE NOT IN FAVOR OF THE 0 ST. EXTENSION Name Address Date ^,�. /4/ti ot ,Y.i/„c.tic v 1 Pic Iefe/d d ` , .-r/-tee-ley 6 -6,7 ,11 o ( I CR/ E;ves-Fiev( 3()qG t lx)C,2 23 r -ete Co Co- `s--U'-=> ,tiF.„ /_1 '//�_/f r .//3/4s- 4,t/Q2.eL, ., ac..4 6 t-ds- - ' 27,77.,n t,C,.J '1 Ais.4_i<'e,A/ /S/6%..e,e-6/ 4j rC.c /4 6'21�� -. 2Y/4c 1)&07'0 `u:-;4 b y V riVint Co CSc.)c' 2- 1"` ( f�:. ...Q-n-- /4/G 3 tiC a (oh/ AtQa..#,, C3 . 6/: ,/os f' K 7 ,'1 ' ve -,+ : mY . e. c it ) 4 _77 (o ,. r \, R ,l-) rr : < ) l,bI, .. . CAL-31 (,kits ✓1e ' /-Itie. L.✓ i-' /377/ WCa enti 6,....e-ley ,i. . 4"th5i %'1c.f7 or ��-, 0X 4rite) \(.1 �`' /&� IS/ sc./c(E• Its/ �re /e eor ale03 / :A..2/7 7. y_(^]G-_- / / T [/ (�01�%.'�. ( -(cam -, !/z y ,, cE' „( -).. i- 2 6 .3 f j--k - 2 ' 61 &:-.›; �% Z/1a> " 7/29 Zr.,2.5 Gc>,`. ciiso_ j C4, .577-- CM Hr 4)22 ,,,� , ) .u'� eR c? 1€. WC �, Cruel) ' €1J(�/ ./T.__a.�t� 407 5'i- h.��.,,, Po 1/4,1 `� C,t ✓Y . 0--tra. (l�i 3 S� . - •-e9)1,z-� d fate., �1/ . U _ - _, k.- 1.),,, P na,z � l5vl�6p- ${� yy.��e,... a ,CDC • 8cfoa3//� ("{� 4 F• i s I/i% U, /6t O�1 , 1.. -+'if Qt'e / eio t ,7 t 4J . ,c �.a,n,� 673g a). /5"1 SL Lane_ (4i-tau( 106-4*.' 8064`/ 1-c " eV L• Gc7 -540 7 //tt'f-/L2 6;_p/Fir--t ! n 1O 6.4. 2. a,) i' . # -c c,sY ' _. . L._ 41* • / /3r • y e 3Y . ' /Lam{- CJ R.1 fh< Co .:.63 i <AC' 5• C - //, ‘,‘ - 7 1 ,, /la'. Di i 257) - s/ 9 #/ 9.i o. 6.1e �S"c s7- ?wt NX-,-ti.,-�.-,-� 24.37 w tie 04 ca, r-t , .j,.,_ Kct 3 f- ' f/ lk CO 6',37 „ . / da Y g4i2a _//p tI 3.2 4 .1 _./ C? A .. e r c -5 � . 17 ) .7 .v4:V/flat 12, alt,3 '2 /64919-8-e.- .nc_- (2 n 26 6 3/ WE ARE NOT IN FAVOR OF THE 0 ST. EXTENSION Name Address Date )3 r0 A-1 (0.t1 /0972 tacit 72 7-9-cS (1 a (41- ' ), 'PYD _R WE ARE OPPOSED TO THE EXTENSION OF 0 STREET AND THE WIDENING OF 0 STREET FROM US 85 TO SH 257 Name & Signature Address Date .11: r'. . ,,&n, -f X02 37 /lve G- /eyCc, 84Was � Q t i $6a/ g d z 6 .e - cee es- , -1-) 7 % fl. it (.A7)z 6 07 50 A (IN (=- r ; , 3J-- :-/-( Th_ i\--).79ItyP /7/ 0 S C rc)st -(S --Dj 4} a,}..rg 7;40...._.2......•••••4 4...s VHdefre 1.'i - 2v,0_,,,,i-_afeele-69674 ei-e---et f/l, Gv n rJ ( emu " �C��`�� c�l �r I/1 Fo Po w/ ,tn,,, ) )33e2 d'Iae gas:, Ocem -57 40 aet:ittoeta Ake Wej44-1-'ail ge) 4-7 - J/ V-au /0 _r 2G Z l 7 Ave_ C' /� �yta ' tzia, , ce,;6 43) l`' ' 00.4.,7( kv_____/ 237 N Li Y`` Cti„-e pi Di in in— t /2- • 3qz., Circe N WE ARE NOT IN FAVOR OF THE 0 ST. EXTENSION Name Address Date "` C� /4 s l 73/ w ci b y 7 _/ DS cae,,e_ 7- "/- cc ,,L.; ,v e/-et - , ,'5 t7 /-cX 6 `V c5P-�or C u ItinN k 494 - l3- Off- G 1 �� / at1 1(),51/ /479/? alw (p4 �" P� 5 �<._2 4-lrc-a L pJG I.* lit 41 'S sJ C:12 La � 9 1 v 9 1 O s' �_' �'74n tfv<rpfilei /ig c-r9 I".1. 6ct 71rf / ,-- Hello