HomeMy WebLinkAbout20082190.tiff Town of Mead
P.O.Box 626
441 Third Street
Mead"A Little Town Mead,Colorado 80542-0626
With a Big Future (970)535-4477
•
CERTIFIED MAIL# 7007 1490 0004 3519 0718
August 1, 2008
Weld County Board of Commissioners
P.O. Box 758
Greeley, CO 80632
RE: Notice of Public Hearing- Sekich Business Park No. 6 Annexation
Planning Commission - 7:00 P.M., Wednesday, August 20, 2008.
Gentlemen:
Please be advised that a public hearing before the Mead Planning Commission has been
set to review and consider the annexation of Lot 10, Block 2, Sekich Business Park. The property
is owned by the NSN Group LLC and SNH LLC, 4325 Hilltop Rd, Longmont, CO 80504-9682
and is proposed to be used for industrial purposes.
In accordance with C.R.S. § 31-12-108 (2), this notice has been sent to the Board of
County Commissioners and County Attorney for Weld County, and to each special district or
school district having territory within the area to be annexed. This notice has also been sent to
service providers and those holding a franchise with the Town.
Attached is a copy of the published public hearing notice, together with a copy of the
applicant's petition for annexation and the adopted resolution finding substantial compliance and
initiating annexation proceedings. As one of the Town's referral agencies, you have previously
received copies the application and the annexation map for the property. Copies of the full
application, as well as the full-sized maps submitted with the application are available for review
in the Mead Town Hall, 441 - 3rd Street, Mead, Colorado. Written comments may be sent to Dan
Dean, Town Manager, Box 626, Mead, CO 80542.
Very truly yours
Candace Bridgwater
Town Clerk
A5efc (.70 : ' sc' (2J c
2008-2190
a4
N£1
_____IL Ee nil
4s�
IOD g g4
A1NI10J Q73M
Iii
- g p
...L/1-6'as\...woo f11JM P ¢kp p II . ' 9i n s w
i1 w A330+.401;41 65 $ Y11 Il� I I l CS® i
L 11 3 b : II
75 a71 &' ebb aP I- 'j
ID 1 D yg Y ; i Ub Y �ii�i
= A YA : ill C �a QVJ i
bI3ov >wg I�agwaI.
a f f t
��Q� aa ■ jg E
SL-i 3LY15631N1 H 0r— 3R O i a s till 4 y b I
LT_P iYa 9 N
F � t � I I a:� b Pull
to 2;011,,,. p.agyl .1 Q R g l$ b g 11 I it
" Y
I 'El tgl al g Z bop gb osi
Z 0g !z PIo 114
Z aU ' I
O
�o
H o<
7. I
rp *I D si _ i '• S^ o
W • ,,
g ne 6 b! W R g f
e 11W o a a R3yR "3g t g-"�t ;/i-v affil r MOM 07311307311Z oaf Q :e i g wJN —"Arson sancta
i III
ZWOFZ / o.v< -�� ---\- �Ewwa.rtrr`.✓,______- - i1 r
-- -
m o ,bb — u mn y II
1IOK VW' Ii �SMw I I l ,w�Z161 E�K¢0.10N ■ '• j w,KF1N1N '•
<ZU r • w i - il ! `i :I 1
< vj W M 1W1. qk ...•i '4 4,4 OB110M ( i `itr e I 1 wI t
W JOB i ___._. I _.... 'i -f \a ail I�t ep
I—Rv l c iI }
VALL �� ----• lill j 'it i Pp 4. ,, w'.
W ?10 11: 4 i.. RI Ili F , I1 g - @
D 6,°- 1:.) i i_ . §ri
Z
CO a s.
_ <*
u.,
W
U
zz
Wm c i NI at g Ii;
Li p x il
g QQ
�� j¢s; @ i1 ` i III iii 11n 3
_ • 8gig( Y� t Ili'
Y
E i ° II g IEa Ind
t Ili g
bC s i � a" 4 bag I i it bI gt
CC: 6 FF 1N■ x !I, Il 1 ! a g i , i ev pbpls 1
eb i � � s �41Y1=a °< b° � � 6 a � b Ji
E 1t � !s Z
til di �� @9pg 98 a i gigi5 ! k O g8 g g� tQ b i i ° a I a g a gait ll
tig4+ a g I9v' bill b Pg bb b qQ R b iilllow i�" �li aI9b5ai 'IJ !!,g g � ' b� ��iii A l gi5���'nag� I I� � � � � agg 1 I �i ��
o p. bi a I . bbQ i�04. $ gbh gik iE E @ i - bbybybybbiyybyb 3 N 9 1 5 gE I 5F i
-ill
g !� B i§ b 8 B 8b : g UMW a 3 Z is -,0 .
,..° t. , a - ii Ai lil 9a ii; liot $$$$ erUMMWb Ii- W b g g €fii:g
Fib ga $ Pr i0li ;gAP � a 3w b b LjIe ji i1a g
iia gbEiplbiib •bkb IMill@ a _ ! K Ca it ew .gF iba
cat a e:ill.2 . 9 i .5spa ipb Ix Ri lb it a. bbb d g agip !§ , t a l;g m i is nw ai I
L g�� ig eg �x E.ab A E @ t I. � � bibs; . k .b p� i U bi; . .a I.,
g l II s I it ig. l �- I. g I @I I � i'I I I igil bh b I ;I J Mill
r�I ' . l!ibgy li t
g ! C i ill hi.IIi Iw . . .9
4r
J
PETITION FOR ANNEXATION
TO: THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF MEAD, COLORADO:
(I/We), , the undersigned landowners, in accordance with Colorado law, hereby petition the Town
of Mead and its Board of Trustees for annexation to the Town of Mead of the following described
unincorporated territory located in the County of Weld and State of Colorado, to-wit:
LOT 10"LOT 10 BLOCK 2, SEKICH BUSINESS PARK", AS RECORDED AT RECEPTION NO.
02210262 IN BOOK 1260, ON APRIL 09, 1990, OF THE RECORDS OF THE WELD COUNTY CLERK
AND RECORDER;
TOGETHER WITH THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PARCEL:
BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 10, "LOT 10, BLOCK 2 SEKICH BUSINESS
PARK"AND CONSIDERING THE EAST LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 23,
TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 68 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M. TO BEAR NORTH 01°05'34"WEST WITH
ALL BEARINGS CONTAINED HEREIN RELATIVE THERETO;
THENCE NORTH 01°05'34"WEST, 30.00' FEET WESTERLY OF AND PARALLEL TO SAID EAST LINE,
A DISTANCE OF 60.00 FEET TO THE NORTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF MULLIGAN DRIVE;
THENCE NORTH 89°23'54" EAST, ALONG AN EXTENSION OF SAID NORTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY
LINE OF MULLIGAN DRIVE,A DISTANCE OF 30.00 FEET TO SAID EAST LINE;
THENCE SOUTH 01°05'34"WEST, ALONG SAID EAST LINE, A DISTANCE OF 1972.33 FEET TO A
POINT BEING 40.00 FEET NORTHERLY OF THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SOUTHWEST QUARTER,
ALSO BEING THE NORTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY OF STATE HIGHWAY 66;
THENCE SOUTH 89°06'08"WEST, 40.00 FEET NORTHERLY OF AND PARALLEL TO SAID SOUTH
LINE, ALSO BEING SAIID NORTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY OF STATE HIGHWAY 66,A DISTANCE OF
30.00 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 01°05'34"WEST, 30.00 FEET WESTERLY OF AND PARALLEL TO SAID EAST LINE,
ALSO BEING THE EASTERLY LINE OF THE FOLLOWING FOUR (4) PARCELS:
1) LOT 4, BLOCK 4 OF"REPLAT'A'OF SEKICH BUSINESS PARK, RECEPTION NO. 01952675;
2) LOT 5, BLOCK 4 OF"SEKICH BUSINESS PARK", RECEPTION NO. 01923948;
3)LOT 9, BLOCK 2 OF "SEKICH BUSINESS PARK";AND
4) SAID LOT 10, "LOT 10, BLOCK 2 SEKICH BUSINESS PARK";
A DISTANCE OF 1912.48 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING;
SAID OVERALL PARCEL CONTAINING 205,437 SQUARE FEET OR 4.716 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
As part of this petition, your petitioner further states to the Board of Trustees of Mead, Colorado,
that:
1. It is desirable and necessary that the territory described be annexed to the Town of Mead.
2. The requirements of C.R.S. sections 31-12-104 and 31-12-105, as amended, exist or have
been met in that:
a. Not less than one-sixth of the perimeter of the area proposed to be annexed is
contiguous with the Town of Mead or will be contiguous with the Town of Mead within such time
as required by 31-12-104.
Annexation petition 6/25/2008 1
b. A community of interest exists between the area proposed to be annexed and the
Town of Mead.
c. The area proposed to be annexed is urban or will be urbanized in the near future.
d. The area proposed to be annexed is integrated with or is capable of being integrated
with the Town of Mead.
e. No land within the boundary of the territory proposed to be annexed which is held in
identical ownership, whether consisting of one tract or parcel of real estate or two or more
contiguous tracts or parcels of real estate, has been divided into separate parts or parcels without
the written consent of the landowner or landowners thereof, unless such tracts or parcels were
separated by a dedicated street, road or other public way.
f. No land within the boundary of the area proposed to be annexed which is held in
identical ownership, comprises twenty acres or more, and which, together with the buildings and
improvements situated thereon has an assessed value in excess of two hundred thousand dollars
($200,000.00)for ad valorem tax purposes for the year next preceding the annexation, has been
included within the area proposed to be annexed without the written consent of the landowner or
landowners.
g. No annexation proceedings have been commenced for any portion of the territory
proposed to be annexed for the annexation of such territory to another municipality.
h. The annexation of the territory proposed to be annexed will not result in the
detachment of area from any school district.
i. The annexation of the territory proposed to be annexed will not have the effect of
extending the boundary of the Town of Mead more than three miles in any direction from any point
of the boundary of the Town of Mead in any one year.
j. Prior to completion of the annexation of the territory proposed to be annexed, the Town
of Mead will have in place a plan for that area, which generally describes the proposed: Location,
character, and extent of streets, subways, bridges, waterways,waterfronts, parkways,
playgrounds, squares, parks, aviation fields, other public ways, grounds, open spaces, public
utilities, and terminals for water, light, sanitation, transportation, and power to be provided by the
Town of Mead; and the proposed land uses for the area; such plan to be updated at least once
annually.
k. In establishing the boundary of the territory proposed to be annexed, if a portion of a
platted street or alley is to be annexed, the entire width of the street or alley has been included
within the territory to be annexed. The Town of Mead will not deny reasonable access to any
landowners, owners of any easement, or the owners of any franchise adjoining any platted street
or alley which is to be annexed to the Town of Mead but is not bounded on both sides by the Town
of Mead.
3. The owners of more than fifty percent of the area proposed to be annexed, exclusive of
dedicated streets and alleys, have signed this petition and hereby petition for annexation of such territory.
4. Accompanying this petition are four copies of an annexation map containing the information
following:
a. A written legal description of the boundaries of the area proposed to be annexed;
Artr.exa Lion Petition 6/25/2006 2
b. A map showing the boundary or the area proposed to be annexed, said map prepared
and containing the seal of a registered engineer;
c. Within the annexation boundary map, a showing of the location of each ownership
tract in unplatted land and, if part or all of the area is platted, the boundaries and the plat numbers
of plots or of lots and blocks;
d. Next to the boundary of the area proposed to be annexed, a drawing of the contiguous
boundary of the Town of Mead and the contiguous boundary of any other municipality abutting the
area proposed to be annexed, and a showing of the dimensions of such contiguous boundaries.
5. Upon the Annexation Ordinance becoming effective, all lands within the area proposed to be
annexed will become subject to all ordinances, rules and regulations of the Town of Mead, except for
general property taxes of the Town of Mead which shall become effective as the January 1 next ensuing.
6. The zoning classification (land use) requested for the area proposed to be annexed is
Industrial in Performance District 1.
WHEREFORE, the following petitioner respectfully requests that the Town of Mead, acting
through its Board of Trustees, approve the annexation of the area proposed to be annexed. By this
acknowledgment, the undersigned hereby certify that the above information is complete and true. (If the
applicant is not the owner(s)of the subject property, the owner(s), mortgage and/or lienholder shall also
sign the Application.)
Owner: Date:
Owner: Date:
ApplicantlS � Date: 7--/
YO
(attach additional signatures as necessary)
STATE OF COLORAD )
) sS,
COUNTY OF W )
(/ The for goi g instrument a a ; ledged before me this �V day of
200 n by Ork,
My commission expires: /1.3 /
Witness My hand and official seal.
SiZit
Notary Public
•
Annexation Petition 6/25/2008 3
July 14, 2008
Mead Board of Trustees
441 3`a Street
Mead, Colorado 80542-4477
RE: Request for Annexation
Lot 10 Block 2 Sekich Business Park
Gentlemen:
NSN Group LLC would like to request the Annexation of Lot 10, Block 2 of Sekich
Business Park into the Town of Mead. This annexation will continue the process of
annexation of this subdivision into the town. Attached for our approval are the necessary
annexation documents prepared in accordance with the Town of Mead Criteria.
Following annexation, it is our intention to initiate a minor replat of this parcel and
develop the property. We look forward to working with the Board of Trusties and Town
of Mead staff on this project.
Si "rely;
pka_eifi 14*/
ayne Schell
Manager
NSN Group LLC
4325 Hilltop Road
Longmont, Co. 80504
Landowner/Petitioner Date Signed Legal Description
Mailing Address of Land Owned
-lit tog"
w.S
Annexation Petition 6)25/2008 4
AFFIDAVIT OF CIRCULATOR
STATE OF COLORADO )
ss.
COUNTY OF 4,-1-17 )
1�
/v' > r '5 4 LL— , being first duly sworn upon oath, deposes and says
that (he or he)was the circulator of this Petition for Annexation of lands to the Town of Mead, Colorado,
consisting of[�. ] pages including this page and that each signature hereon was witnessed by your affiant
and is the signature of the person whose name it purports t / / 1 ,i
oobb
Ci
Circulator-
STATE OF COLORADO )
C./�l,Cl� ) SS.
COUNTY OF
The foreg9ing instrument wa ac no I ged before me this l 1/4
day of
200 by LA-O ne CA4 .
My commis on expires: a o -ft)
Witness .
Witness My hand and official seal.
Notary Public
•
Annexalion Petition 6/2512008 5
Town of Mead
� ) I P.O.Box 626
441 Third Street
Mead"A ante Town Mead,Colorado 80542-0626
With a Big Future" (970)5354477
CERTIFIED MAIL# 7007 1490 0004 3518 9552
July 29, 2008
Weld County Board of Commissioners
P.O. Box 758
Greeley, CO 80632
RE: Request for Comments and Recommendations on the Annexation of the Sekich
Business Park Annexation No. 6.
Gentlemen:
Enclosed is a copy of the application, annexation maps and other supporting material for
the proposed annexation of the Sekich Business Park Annexation No. 6 to the Town of Mead.
This property is located in Weld County on approximately 4.7 acres at the southwest corner of
Mead Street and WCR 9 ''A within the Sekich Business Park. The property is currently zoned for
industrial uses in Weld County and will continue to be used for industrial uses in the Town of
Mead.
The purpose of this referral is to obtain the comments and recommendations of various
governmental agencies and service providers as to the appropriateness of the annexation. Your
comments are welcome and will assist the Board of Trustees and Planning Commission in their
review of the proposal. We ask that your comments reach us no later than August 15. We ask that
you forward your response directly to Samson, Pipis & Marsh, LLC, c/o Gary West, P.O. Box
1079, Longmont, CO 80502.
Thank you for your cooperation and assistance.
Very truly yours,
Candace Bridgwater
Town Clerk
)l-
C FiLiiti
Referral Notice-SBP#6 wpd 7/29/08 10:30 am
e o ' _ Deng
• D-2 Form, Conceptual Plan Application
and Decision Record
D-4 Form, Fiscal Impact Study
3 D-5 Form, Agreement for Payment of
Review Expenses
nti
ar
Letter of Intent
5 Annexation Petition
6 Proof of Ownership
Mailing List of Adjacent Property Owners
Envelopes for Mailing Notices and
Referrals
erkAnnexation Map
Northern Colorado Water Conservancy
District Petition
Warranty Deed for Non tributary Water
Rights
Annexation Impact Report
Concept Plan
• Annexation/Development Information
15 Town Policy Statement
TOWN OF MEAD
LAND USE CODE
FORM D-2
PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICATION AND DECISION RECORD
FOR A LAND USE CHANGE OF MAJOR IMPACT
Name of Subdivision: Sekich Business Park
Applicable Section(s):
Copies Required:
A. Preliminary Plat Submission Requirements.
1. Applicant's name, address and telephone number:
NSN Group LLC and SNH LLC 4325 Hilltop Road, Longmont CO 80504-9682, (970) 535-4780
2. Legal description of the property proposed for the land use change:
Lot 10, Block 2, Sekich Business Park
3. Proposed land use change located in Mead Performance District No. 1 .
4. Give a brief nonlegal description of the existing land use of the site and of the general character of
the use of adjacent lands.
The existing and proposed land is zoned industrial, the land use of the adjoining properties are
industrial .
5. Give a brief nonlegal description of the proposed land use change including the number of living
units, type of home occupation proposed, the placement of a mobile home, etc.
The proposed land use is industrial
6. Provide a sketch plan of the proposed land use change, including a site analysis consisting of a
map, plot plan or diagram showing the total acreage, abutting landowners and land uses, streets,
highways, utilities that will service the proposed development; and major physical features,
including drainage and the location of natural hazards. [attach maps and sketches as necessary]
7. A master development plan, if the land use change is proposed to be constructed in stages
requiring separate reviews and approvals.
8. Provide an elevation drawing of the proposed structure(s) showing height and describing the
MEAD-D-2 FORM LUC 1/13/07(403 pm) Page 1 of 4
exterior materials. [attach drawings as necessary]
O9. The fiscal impact analysis, Form D-4.
10. Provide other information that the applicant believes will assist the Planning Commission and the
Board of Trustees in making a fair decision. [attach additional sheets as necessary]
11. Signature of the Applicant: By this acknowledgment, the undersigned hereby certify that the above
information is complete and true. (If the applicant is not the owner(s) of the subject property, the
owner(s), mortgage and/or lienholder shall also sign the Application.)
Owner: Date:
Owner: �/'/j /� Date:
Applicar '� �///,L it Jw/i Date: 7.7 V t9(
(at addi`tii nal signatures as ne ssary)
STATE OF COLORADO
SS.
COUNTY OF )
J ' / /
The re oing I ment asgclsngwledged before me this J 7 day of—by geMycommslonexpires: /J3—/QP .YPUBLH
EILA I GOODWes h nd and Dffici Ial.
G f<2 j 2,4,e v STATE OF COLORADO
Notary Public w�. •. >- ��
My Commission Expires 11/03/2010
*****************APPLICANT NOT TO WRITE BELOW THIS LINE*******************
B. Review Agency Comments.
1. Building Official:
2. Town Engineer:
3. Town Attorney:
4. Other Referrals:
C. Further information requested, if any:
D. Action by the Planning Commission:
UMEAD-D-2 FORM LUC 1/13/07(4O3 pm)
Page 2 of 4
D. Action by the Planning Commission:
1. The application is complete. Yes G No G
2. The application is for a Major Land Use Change. Yes G No G
3. The requirements of the Mead Land Use Code have been satisfied. Yes G No G
4. If the application is for the annexation of property, has the annexation question benn submitted to, and
approved by the electorate? Yes G No G
5. The application is:
G approved
G disapproved
G approved with the following conditions:
a)
b)
c)
(attach additional conditions as necessary)
DONE by the Mead Planning Commission of Mead, Colorado, this day of , 20_
ATTEST:
Secretary to the Commission Chairman
E. Action by the Board of Trustees.
1. The application is complete. Yes G No G
2. The application is for a Major Land Use Change. Yes e No G
3. The requirements of the Mead Land Use Code have been satisfied. Yes e No G
4. The application is:
G approved
G disapproved
G approved with the following conditions:
a)
MEAD-D-2 FORM LUC 1113/07(4:03 pm) Page 3 of 4
b)
c)
(attach additional conditions as necessary)
DONE by the Mead Board of Trustees of Mead, Colorado, this day of , 20_
ATTEST:
Town Clerk Mayor
MEAD-D-2 FORM LUC 1/13/07(4:03 pm) Page 4 of 4
TOWN OF MEAD
LAND USE CODE
FORM D-4
FISCAL ANALYSIS
(Required for all Preliminary and Final Applications)
(for Major Land Use Changes)
Applicable Section(s): Article XV
Copies Required: 5
Applicant's name, address and telephone number:
NSN Group LLC ,4325 Hiltop Road, Longmont Co 80504-9682, (970)535-4780
Name of the Project:
Sekich Business Park Annexation No. 6
REVENUES.
A. Recurring Revenues:
1. Property Tax.
Market value all single family units [ 0 in)
x factor [ 7.96 % 1(2)=Assessed Valuation [Q..]
Market value all multi-family units 1 0 1t'I
x factor[7.96 % 1(2) =Assessed Valuation [0 1
Market value all mobile home units [0 1t'I
x factor[ 7.96 % 1(2)=Assessed Valuation [p ]
Market value all non-residential structures [1,450,000+ 750,0001(1)
x factor [ 29% 1(2) = Assessed Valuation [638,000]
Total Assessed Valuation [638,000]
Total Assessed Valuation [ ]x Town mill
levy [ 8.919 mills 1(3) =Town Property Tax Revenue [5,6901
Total Assessed Valuation [ 1 x St. Vrain School mill
levy[ 39.982 mills 1(3)= School Property Tax Revenue [25,509]
Total Assessed Valuation [ 1 x Mt. View Fire
District mill levy 1 8.037 mills 1(3) = Fire District
Page 1 of 6
111 Developer's projected market value.
rl)Call county assessor to determine what factor to use in order to obtain current assessed value of proposed development
from market value in the area.
(3)Contact the Town Clerk for current factors.
Mead - D-4 Form LUC - Revised 1-31-06 January 31, 2006
Property Tax Revenue [5,128]
Total Assessed Valuation I 1 x Weld County mill
levy [ 17.900 mills 1(3) = County Property Tax Revenue [10,846]
Total Assessed Valuation [ 1x St. Vrain San. Dist. mill
levy ( 3.918 mills 1(3) = St. Vrain San. Dist. Tax Revenue [2,5001
Total Assessed Valuation 9 Ix all other
mill levies [ 4.503 mills 1(J) =Other Property Tax Revenue [2,8731
Total Property Tax Revenue 152,5461
2. Sales Tax.
Population in the development[ 4 ix the
last year's per capita collection [ $48.46 1(3)
= total annual sales tax revenue [485]
Estimated gross retail sales within the development
1 0 1 x 2%(3) = total annual sales tax revenue (20,000]
3. Sewer Revenue.
Population in the development[ 4 1x the
last year's per capita collection J $75.21 1t3)
=total annual sewer revenue 17521
4. Other Revenue (taxes, fees, permits, etc.).
Population in the development[ 4 1x the
last year's per capita collection J $65.80 1t3)
=total other revenue [6581
Nonresidential - business licenses, liquor licenses, etc.(3)
=total annual other revenue [01
TOTAL RECURRING REVENUE [21,895]
B. One-Time Revenues.
1. Building Permits.
Market value of structure(s)[1,450,000+750,000](')x
factor J .0099375 + $30.00/BP 1(41= building permit revenue [21,893]
2. Use Taxes.
Market value of structure(s) [1,450,000+750,0001() x
50% x 2% = use tax revenue [22,000]
3. Sewer Plant Investment.
Page 2 of 6
()Developer's projected market value.
(2)Call county assessor to determine what factor to use in order to obtain current assessed value of proposed development
from market value in the area.
(3)Contact the Town Clerk for current factors.
Mead - D-4 Form LUC - Revised 1-31-06 January 31, 2006
Total taps x factor [ $6,000.00 1(3) =total PIF [12,000]
4. Storm drainage.
Number of dwelling units [ 0 ] x $131
=residential storm drainage impact fees [0 1
Square feet of nonresidential development[9,684+6,336]
x $0.08/sq.ft. = nonresidential storm drainage impact fees [1,2821
5. Transportation.
Number of dwelling units [ 0 ] x $1,350
= residential transportation impact fees [0 ]
Square feet of nonresidential development [9,684+6,336]
x$0.37/sq.ft. = nonresidential transportation impact fees [5,927]
6. Open Space.
Number of dwelling units [ 0 1 x $1,852
=residential open space impact fees 1 0 1
Square feet of nonresidential development [9,684+6,336]
x$0.47/sq.ft. = nonresidential open space impact fees [7,529]
7. Police Protection.
Number of dwelling units [ 0 1 x $50
= residential police protection impact fees [p ]
Square feet of nonresidential development[9,684+6,3361
x$0.01/sq.ft. = nonresidential police protection impact fees [ 160]
8. Municipal Facilities.
Number of dwelling units [ 0 1x$1, 697
= residential municipal facilities impact fees []
Square feet of nonresidential development[9,684+6,3361
x$0.43/sq.ft. = nonresidential municipal facilities impact fees [6,887]
9. Park System.
Number of dwelling units [ 0 1 x $462
= residential park system impact fees [01
10. Recreation Center.
Number of dwelling units [ 0 ] x$1, 683
=residential recreation center impact fees 10]
Page 3 of 6
111 Developers projected market value.
(21 Call county assessor to determine what factor to use in order to obtain current assessed value of proposed development
from market value in the area.
(3t Contact the Town Clerk for current factors.
Mead - D-4 Form LUC - Revised 1-31-06 January 31, 2006
11. Downtown Revitalization (public facilities).
Number of dwelling units [ 0 ] x$304
= residential downtown revitalization impact fees U
12. Capital Equipment.
Number of dwelling units ( 0 ] x $316
= residential capital equipment impact fees (01
Square feet of nonresidential development(9,684+6,336]
x $0.09/ sq.ft. = nonresidential capital equipment impact fees [1,4421
TOTAL ONE TIME REVENUE [79,120]
II. EXPENDITURES.
A. Recurring Costs.
1. Street Maintenance.
Acres in development[4.716] x 4% x factor [ $2,287.00 ]t3)
= total street maintenance costs [ 431 ]
2. Police Protection.
Projected population at full development [ 4+6 1
x per capita cost of police protection [ $23.87 1t3)
=total police protection costs [2391
Square feet of nonresidential development(
x [ 1t3) = nonresidential police protection costs [01
3. General Government.
Projected population at full development( 4+6
x per capita cost of general government[ $87.18 ]�)
=total general government costs [872]
Square feet of nonresidential development [9,684+6,336]
x [ 1(3) = nonresidential general government costs [01
4. Parks and Recreation.
Projected population at full development [ 4+6
x per capita cost of park maintenance [$10.00 1(3)
=total park maintenance costs [100]
5. Sewer Collection and Treatment.
Page 4 of 6
(1)Developer's projected market value.
(11 Call county assessor to determine what factor to use in order to obtain current assessed value of proposed development
from market value in the area.
(3)Contact the Town Clerk for current factors.
Mead - D-4 Form LUC - Revised 1-31-06 January 31, 2006
Projected population at full development[ 4+6 1
x per capita cost of sewer collection and
treatment [ $100.20 1(3) =total sewer costs [1,002]
6. Storm Water and Drainage.
Projected population at full development [ 4+6 1
x per capita cost of storm water and drainage
maintenance [ 1t31=total storm water costs [ 01
Square feet of nonresidential development [9,684+6,336]
x [ 1131 = nonresidential storm water costs [0 1
TOTAL RECURRING COSTS [2,664]
B. One-Time Costs.
1. Park and Recreation.
Projected population at full development [ 4+6
x .001 facilities per capita x 5,000 sq.ft. x average cost
per sq.ft. for recreation facilities J $65.00 ]131
=total recreation facilities costs [6501
2. Sewer Plant.
Projected population at full development [ 4+6 1
1 '
x gallons per capita [ 120 gal. x cost per gallon of
capacity[ $3.50 1(3) =total cost of sewer plant [35]
TOTAL ONE-TIME COSTS [685]
TOTAL RECURRING REVENUES [52,546]
TOTAL RECURRING EXPENDITURES [2,664]
DIFFERENCE [49 8821
TOTAL ONE-TIME REVENUES 179,120]
TOTAL ONE-TIME EXPENDITURES [685]
DIFFERENCE [78,435]
*************************************************************************
Page 5 of 6
"1 Developer's projected market value.
(2)Call county assessor to determine what factor to use in order to obtain current assessed value of proposed development
from market value in the area.
(3)Contact the Town Clerk for current factors.
Mead - D-4 Form LUC - Revised 1-31-06 January 31, 2006
HI. Signature of the Applicant.
By this acknowledgment, the undersigned hereby certify that the above information is complete and true.
(If the applicant is not the owner(s)of the subject property, the owner(s), mortgage and/or lienholder shall
also sign the Application.)
Owner: Date:
Owner: ,%/j�� Date: �p
Applicanr��' ^'r Aire Date: 7-25-02?
(attach additional sig es as necessary)
STATE OF COLORADO)
SS.
COUNTY OF 4A€C)
20 The foregoinginst ument was acknp^Ir;d��before me this -eciday of 4/y
y �f � /
My commission expi es: 3-0
Witness My hand and official seal.
Notary ublic
SHEILA L. GOODMAN
NOTARY PUBLIC
STATE OF COLORADO
My Commission Expires 11/03/2010
Page 6 of 6
",Developer's projected market value.
(21 Call county assessor to determine what factor to use in order to obtain current assessed value of proposed development
from market value in the area.
(3)Contact the Town Clerk for current factors.
Mead - D-4 Form LUC - Revised 1-31-06 January 31, 2006
TOWN OF MEAD
LAND USE CODE
FORM D-5
AGREEMENT FOR PAYMENT OF
REVIEW AND DEVELOPMENT EXPENSES INCURRED BY THE TOWN
Name of Subdivision: Sekich Business Park
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this 2nd day of July , A.D. 2008, by and between the
TOWN OF MEAD, COLORADO, a municipal Corporation, hereinafter referred to as "the Town," and
NSN Group LLC , hereinafter referred to as "the Owner/Developer;@
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, the Owner/Developer owns of certain property situated in the County of Weld, State
of Colorado, and legally described as follows, to-wit:
Lot 10, Block 2 Sekich Business Park
WHEREAS, the development process included all aspects of land use including but not limited to
annexation, subdivision, change of land use and the installation of public improvements; and
WHEREAS, the Owner/Developer desires to develop said property and has made application to
the Board of Trustees of the Town of Mead for approval Annexation into the Town of Mead
; and
WHEREAS, the Parties hereto recognize that the cash deposits and non-refundable land use fees
as specified by the Municipal Code of the Town of Mead may not be adequate to fully cover the Town's
expenses in considering the referenced application, including, but not limited to, legal publications,
planning services, engineering services, attorney fees, consultant fees, reproduction of material, public
hearing expenses and recording documents; and
WHEREAS, the Parties hereto recognize that the Town will continue to incur expenses throughout
the entire development process until final completion of the development project;
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and of the mutual promises and conditions
hereinafter contained, it is hereby agreed as follows:
1. FULL AND SEPARATE ACCOUNTING OF REVIEW AND DEVELOPMENT EXPENSES.
The Town will maintain separate accounts of all monies collected and expended as a result of the
review of the above referenced application throughout the development process. Monthly
statements of expenses incurred and the balance remaining in the account will be made available
to the Owner/Developer by the Town.
MEAD-D-5 FORM LUC
Revised: 1/6/03(10:30 pm) Page 1 of 3
2. EXPENDITURE OF FEES PAID BY THE OWNER/DEVELOPER.
The Town shall expend the monies collected from the Owner/Developer in the form of land use
fees and cash deposits, in the payment of expenses incurred in processing the
Owner/Developer's request, throughout the development process until final completion of the
project. Expenses shall include, but not limited to, fees charged to the Town for legal publications,
planning services, engineering services, attorney services, consultant services, reproduction of
material, public hearing expenses, the securing of permits and easements and the recording of
documents. Any cash deposits held by the Town and not expended, will be refunded to the
Owner/Developer, without interest, upon completion or termination of project.
3. PAYMENT OF REVIEW AND OTHER EXPENSES BY THE OWNER/DEVELOPER.
In the event that the Town incurs expenses for the review of the Owner/Developer's request,
greater than the monies collected from the Owner/Developer in the form of land use fees and
cash deposits, the Owner/Developer shall reimburse the Town for the additional expenses and/or
replenish the cash deposits to the level specified. Said reimbursement and/or replenishment shall
be made within ten (10)days of the Town submitting an invoice for the expenses, or a demand for
the replenishment of the cash deposit. Failure by the Owner/Developer to pay within the specified
time shall be cause for the Town to cease processing the application, or deny the
Owner/Developer of the right to appear before Planning Commission or the Board of Trustees, or
deny approval of the application, withhold the issuance of building permits or certificates of
occupancy.
4. APPLICATION TERMINATION.
Except where the law or an agreement with the Town provides otherwise, the Owner/Developer
may terminate his application at any time by giving written notice to the Town. The Town shall
immediately take all reasonable steps necessary to terminate the accrual of costs to the Owner
e.g., notify newspapers to cancel publications, etc. The Owner/Developer will continue to be liable
for all costs reasonably incurred by the Town to terminate the application.
5. COLLECTION OF FEES AND COSTS.
If the Owner/Developer fails to pay the fees required herein when due, the Town may take those
steps necessary and authorized by law to collect the fees due. The Town shall also be entitled to
all court and attorney's fees, other costs incurred in collection and interest on the amount due at
the rate of 18% per annum.
6. PERSONAL GUARANTY.
At the option of the Board of Trustees, the Owner/Developer may be required to provide a
personal guaranty for the payment of review and other expenses.
7. ORIGINAL COUNTERPARTS.
This Agreement may be executed as counterparts, each of which will be an original, but all of
which together shall constitute one and the same instrument.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Town and the Owner/Developer have caused this Agreement to be
duly executed on the day and year first above written. By this acknowledgment, the undersigned hereby
agreed to be bound by the terms and conditions of this agreement.
MEAD-D-5 FORM LUC
Revised. 1/6/03(10:30 pm) Page 2 of 3
(Signature Instructions:And additional signature lines and notary certificates for each signature.)
TOWN OF MEAD OWNER/DEVELOPER
NSN Group LLC
Corpora a if pp' le
By By l�Gy � ,A�",/�
Richard W. Macomber, Mayor
ATTEST:
By
Candace Bridgwater, Town Clerk
STATE OF COLORADO )
)ss.
COUNTY OF )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of
, 20_by as Mayor and as Town Clerk of the Town
of Mead.
My commission expires:
Witness my hand and official seal.
Notary Public
STATE OF COLORADO )
)SS.
COUNTY OFDia )
nt was acknowledged before e th's,/ ay of sc 1'
20&The oregoing 'n ru eby�•��,�No � as 1/11�1iy�.lgi.,rq 1Atte .
My commission expires: //- 3-,4
Witness my hand and official seal. A
Notary Pu
SHEILA L. GOODMAN
NOTARY PUBLIC
STATE OF COLORADO
My commiSSOri Expires 1 1103/201 0
Cam: MEAD-D-5 FORM WC
Revised: 713ro3(10:30pm) Page 3 of 3
July 14, 2008
Mead Board of Trustees
441 3`d Street
Mead, Colorado 80542-4477
RE: Request for Annexation
Lot 10 Block 2 Sekich Business Park
Gentlemen:
NSN Group LLC would like to request the Annexation of Lot 10, Block 2 of Sekich
Business Park into the Town of Mead. This annexation will continue the process of
annexation of this subdivision into the town. Attached for our approval are the necessary
annexation documents prepared in accordance with the Town of Mead Criteria.
Following annexation,it is our intention to initiate a minor replat of this parcel and
develop the property. We look forward to working with the Board of Trusties and Town
of Mead staff on this project.
OSincerel
ayne chell
Manager
NSN Group LLC
4325 Hilltop Road
Longmont, Co. 80504
)
PETITION FOR ANNEXATION
TO: THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF MEAD, COLORADO:
We, NSN Group LLC and SNH LLC, 4325 Hilltop Rd, Longmont, CO 80504-9682, the
undersigned landowners, in accordance with Colorado law, hereby petition the Town of Mead and its
Board of Trustees for annexation to the Town of Mead of the following described unincorporated territory
located in the County of Weld and State of Colorado, to-wit:
Lot 10, Block 2, Sekich Business Park, as further defined in Exhibit A attached hereto
and incorporated herein by this reference.
As part of this petition, your petitioner further states to the Board of Trustees of Mead, Colorado,
that:
1. It is desirable and necessary that the territory described in Exhibit A be annexed to the Town
of Mead.
2. The requirements of C.R.S. sections 31-12-104 and 31-12-105, as amended, exist or have
been met in that:
a. Not less than one-sixth of the perimeter of the area proposed to be annexed is
contiguous with the Town of Mead or will be contiguous with the Town of Mead within such time
as required by 31-12-104.
b. A community of interest exists between the area proposed to be annexed and the
Town of Mead.
c. The area proposed to be annexed is urban or will be urbanized in the near future.
d. The area proposed to be annexed is integrated with or is capable of being integrated
with the Town of Mead.
e. No land within the boundary of the territory proposed to be annexed which is held in
identical ownership, whether consisting of one tract or parcel of real estate or two or more
contiguous tracts or parcels of real estate, has been divided into separate parts or parcels without
the written consent of the landowner or landowners thereof, unless such tracts or parcels were
separated by a dedicated street, road or other public way.
f. No land within the boundary of the area proposed to be annexed which is held in
identical ownership, comprises twenty acres or more, and which, together with the buildings and
improvements situated thereon has an assessed value in excess of two hundred thousand dollars
($200,000.00) for ad valorem tax purposes for the year next preceding the annexation, has been
included within the area proposed to be annexed without the written consent of the landowner or
landowners.
g. No annexation proceedings have been commenced for any portion of the territory
proposed to be annexed for the annexation of such territory to another municipality.
h. The annexation of the territory proposed to be annexed will not result in the
detachment of area from any school district.
Annexation Pe66on NSN&Sekich eosi ess Perk
1
i. The annexation of the territory proposed to be annexed will not have the effect of
extending the boundary of the Town of Mead more than three miles in any direction from any
point of the boundary of the Town of Mead in any one year.
j. Prior to completion of the annexation of the territory proposed to be annexed, the Town
of Mead will have in place a plan for that area, which generally describes the proposed: Location,
character, and extent of streets, subways, bridges, waterways, waterfronts, parkways,
playgrounds, squares, parks, aviation fields, other public ways, grounds, open spaces, public
utilities, and terminals for water, light, sanitation, transportation, and power to be provided by the
Town of Mead; and the proposed land uses for the area; such plan to be updated at least once
annually.
k. In establishing the boundary of the territory proposed to be annexed, if a portion of a
platted street or alley is to be annexed, the entire width of the street or alley has been included
within the territory to be annexed. The Town of Mead will not deny reasonable access to any
landowners, owners of any easement, or the owners of any franchise adjoining any platted street
or alley which is to be annexed to the Town of Mead but is not bounded on both sides by the
Town of Mead.
3. The owners of more than fifty percent of the area proposed to be annexed, exclusive of
dedicated streets and alleys, have signed this petition and hereby petition for annexation of such territory.
4. Accompanying this petition are four copies of an annexation map containing the information
following:
a. A written legal description of the boundaries of the area proposed to be annexed;
b. A map showing the boundary or the area proposed to be annexed, said map prepared
and containing the seal of a registered engineer;
c. Within the annexation boundary map, a showing of the location of each ownership
tract in unplatted land and, if part or all of the area is platted, the boundaries and the plat numbers
of plots or of lots and blocks;
d. Next to the boundary of the area proposed to be annexed, a drawing of the contiguous
boundary of the Town of Mead and the contiguous boundary of any other municipality abutting
the area proposed to be annexed, and a showing of the dimensions of such contiguous
boundaries.
5. Upon the Annexation Ordinance becoming effective, all lands within the area proposed to be
annexed will become subject to all ordinances, rules and regulations of the Town of Mead, except for
general property taxes of the Town of Mead which shall become effective as the January 1 next ensuing.
6. The zoning classification (land use) requested for the area proposed to be annexed is
"Industrial" in Performance District 1.
WHEREFORE, the following petitioner respectfully requests that the Town of Mead, acting
through its Board of Trustees, approve the annexation of the area proposed to be annexed. By this
acknowledgment, the undersigned hereby certify that the above information is complete and true. (If the
applicant is not the owner(s)of the subject property, the owner(s), mortgage and/or lienholder shall also
sign the Application.)
Annexation Petition NSN&Sakion Business Perk
2
Owner: 1114O. Date:
ayne hell, Manager, NSN Group, LLC
Owner: Date: ?'21
ayne S I, Manager, SNH, LLC
(attach additional signatures as necessary)
STATE OF COLORADO )
SS.
COUNTY OF 7,e)Q.dt)
The fore of g instrument was a noo l before me this c2`J day of e�
200 by !J l yc3
My commission expires: /1— 3-10
Witness My hand and official seal. ddiAz otary Public
SHEILA L. GOODMAN
NOTARY PUBLIC
STATE OF COLORADO
My Commission Expires 11/03/2010
Annexation Petition NSN 8 Sekicft Business Palk
3
EXHIBIT A
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
SEKICH BUSINESS PARK ANNEXATION NO. 6
JULY 24, 2008
A PARCEL LOCATED IN THE SOUTH HALF OF SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 68
WEST OF THE 6TH P.M., COUNTY OF WELD, STATE OF COLORADO, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY
DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
LOT 10"LOT 10 BLOCK 2, SEKICH BUSINESS PARK", AS RECORDED AT RECEPTION NO.
02210262 IN BOOK 1260, ON APRIL 09, 1990, OF THE RECORDS OF THE WELD COUNTY CLERK
AND RECORDER;
TOGETHER WITH A PORTION OF WELD COUNTY ROAD 9.5;
SAID COMBINED PARCEL OF LOT 10 AND A PORTION OF WELD COUNTY ROAD 9.5 BEING
MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 10, "LOT 10, BLOCK 2 SEKICH
BUSINESS PARK"AND CONSIDERING THE EAST LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF
SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 68 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M. TO BEAR NORTH
01°05'34"WEST WITH ALL BEARINGS CONTAINED HEREIN RELATIVE THERETO;
THENCE NORTH 01°05'34"WEST, 30.00 FEET WESTERLY OF AND PARALLEL TO SAID EAST
LINE, ALSO BEING THE EASTERLY LINE OF LOT 5, "LOT 5 BLOCK 1 SEKICH BUSINESS PARK"AS
RECORDED AT RECEPTION NO. 02300610 IN BOOK 1348, ON AUGUST 19, 1992 OF SAID
RECORDS OF WELD COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER; ALSO BEING THE EASTERLY LINE OF
BLOCK 1, "FINAL PLAT OF SEKICH BUSINESS PARK"AS RECORDED AT RECEPTION NO.
01923940 IN BOOK 993, ON APRIL 19, 1983, OF SAID RECORDS OF WELD COUNTY CLERK AND
RECORDER; A DISTANCE OF 696.54 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID BLOCK 1;
THENCE NORTH 89°27'14" EAST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SOUTHWEST QUARTER, A
DISTANCE OF 30.00 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SOUTHWEST QUARTER;
THENCE NORTH 89°26'37" EAST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF
SAID SECTION 23, A DISTANCE OF 90.88 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THAT PARCEL
DESCRIBED AT RECEPTION NO. 02838515, RECORDED ON APRIL 06, 2001 OF SAID RECORDS
OF THE WELD COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER;
THENCE SOUTH 00°58'21"EAST ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID PARCEL DESCRIBED AT
RECEPTION NO. 02838515, A DISTANCE OF 2609.11 FEET TO A POINT BEING 40.00 FEET
NORTHERLY OF THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER, ALSO BEING THE
NORTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF STATE HIGHWAY 66;
THENCE SOUTH 89°39'16"WEST, 40.00 FEET NORTHERLY OF AND PARALLEL WITH SAID
SOUTH LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER, A DISTANCE OF 85.41 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF
SAID SOUTHWEST QUARTER;
THENCE SOUTH 89°06'08" WEST, 40.00 FEET NORTHERLY OF AND PARALLEL TO THE SOUTH
LINE OF SAID SOUTHWEST QUARTER, A DISTANCE OF 30.00 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 01°05'34"WEST, 30.00 FEET WESTERLY OF AND PARALLEL TO SAID EAST
LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER, ALSO BEING THE EASTERLY LINES OF THE FOLLOWING
THREE (3) PARCELS:
1) LOT 4, BLOCK 4 OF"REPLAT'A'OF SEKICH BUSINESS PARK, RECEPTION NO. 01952675;
2) LOT 5, BLOCK 4 OF"SEKICH BUSINESS PARK", RECEPTION NO. 01923948;
3) LOT 9, BLOCK 2 OF"SEKICH BUSINESS PARK",
A DISTANCE OF 1302.71 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 10;
THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHERLY, WESTERLY AND NORTHERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID LOT 10
THE FOLLOWING SIX (6) COURSES:
1) SOUTH 89°23'00"WEST, A DISTANCE OF 233.03 FEET;
2) NORTH 01°05'34"WEST, A DISTANCE OF 488.31 FEET;
3) NORTH 26°02'45"WEST, A DISTANCE OF 63.14 FEET;
4) NORTH 34°53'40"WEST, A DISTANCE OF 29.59 FEET;
5) NORTH 46°47'25"WEST, A DISTANCE OF 57.86 FEET:
6) NORTH 89°23'54" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 317.54 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING,
CONTAINING A CALCULATED AREA OF 454,487 SQUARE FEET, OR 10.343 ACRES, MORE OF
LESS.
a Stewart Title of Colorado,Inc.
�/�/
SteA A/art a 1729 Terry Street
Longmont,Colorado 81501
title of colorado Phone 303-651-1401
Fax 303-651-1501
Date: May 12,2008
Order Number: 13331
Buyer: Town of Mead
Seller: NSN Group, LLC,a Colorado Limited Liability Company and SNH, LLC, a Colorado
Limited Liability Company
Property Address: 4402 Hilltop Road, Mead,CO
Tax Schedule Number: R0054692-120723001025
Please direct all Escrow inquiries to: Please direct all Title inquiries to:
Kathy Mercier Paul Muchow
Phone: 303-651-1401 Phone: 970-669-4071
Email Address: kmercier@.stewart.com Email Address: paul.muchow@stewart.com
LISTING BROKER: SELLER:
None
NSN Group,LLC,a Colorado Limited Liability Company
SNH,LLC,a Colorado Limited Liability Company
4325 Hilltop Road
Longmont,Colorado 80504
SELLING BROKER: BUYER/BORROWER:
None
Town of Mead
***SEND EXCEPTIONS***
***SEND EXCEPTIONS***
We Appreciate Your Business And Look Forward to Serving You in the Future.
ALTA Commitment(6/17/06)
ALTA Commitment Form
COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE
Issued by
stewart
title guaranty company
Stewart Title Guaranty Company, a Texas Corporation ("Company"), for a valuable consideration,
commits to issue its policy or policies of title insurance, as identified in Schedule A, in favor of the
Proposed Insured named in Schedule A, as owner or mortgagee of the estate or interest in the land
described or referred to in Schedule A, upon payment of the premiums and charges and compliance with
the Requirements; all subject to the provisions of Schedules A and B and to the Conditions of this
Commitment.
This Commitment shall be effective only when the identity of the Proposed Insured and the amount of
the policy or policies committed for have been inserted in Schedule A by the Company.
All liability and obligation under this Commitment shall cease and terminate six months after the
Effective Date or when the policy or policies committed for shall issue, whichever first occurs, provided
that the failure to issue the policy or policies is not the fault of the Company.
The Company will provide a sample of the policy form upon request.
This commitment shall not be valid or binding until countersigned by a validating officer or authorized
signatory.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Stewart Title Guaranty Company has caused its corporate name and seal to
be hereunto affixed by its duly authorized officers on the date shown in Schedule A.
Countersigned:
-_ stewart 6
Authorized Conni<,:im�amrc --title guaranty company / F•� 1 .
- Senior Chairman oft e Board
Stewart Title of Colorado,Inc. a1ek
1729 Terry Street 4.1,44#4S1, GE`G� to
Longmont,Colorado 81501 111A0181f2p1F,# Chairman of the Board
Phone 303-651-1401 '€ysd
Fax 303-651-1501 OlkA' , �
President
Order Number: 13331 ALTA Commitment(6/17/06)
COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE
SCHEDULE A
1. Effective Date: April 30, 2008 at 7:30 A.M. Order Number: 13331
2. Policy or Policies To Be Issued: Amount of Insurance
(a) A.L.T.A. Owner's (Standard) $ TBD
Proposed Insured:
Town of Mead
(b) A.L.T.A. Loan
3. The estate or interest in the land described or referred to in this Commitment and covered herein is:
Fee Simple
4. Title to the Fee Simple estate or interest in said land is at the effective date hereof vested in:
NSN Group, LLC, a Colorado Limited Liability Company and SNH, LLC, a Colorado Limited
Liability Company
5. The land referred to in this Commitment is described as follows:
See Attached Legal Description
Purported Address: STATEMENT OF CHARGES
4402 Hilltop Road These charges are due and payable
Mead,Colorado before a Policy can be issued:
SEE STATEMENT OF CHARGES, ATTACHED
HERETO
Order Number: 13331 stewart
ALTA Commitment(6/17/06)—Schedule A title guaranty company
Page 1 of 3
EXHIBIT "A"
Lot 10, Block 2, Sekich Business Park, a P.U.D., tract located in the SW1/4 of Section 23,
Township 3 North, Range 68 West of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado, said lot being more
particularly described as follows:
Beginning at the Northwest corner of Block 2, Sekich Business Park, according to the recorded
Plat thereof, and considering the West line of said Block 2 as bearing South 00°16'59"West, and
with all other bearings contained herein relative thereto; thence along the North line of said
Block 2, N89°43'01"E, 824.57 feet to the Point of Beginning, thence continuing along the North
line of said Block 2, N89°43'01"E, 317.54 feet to a point on the West right of way line of County
Road Number 9-1/2; thence along said right of way line S00°46'27"E, 609.77 feet; thence
S89°42'07"W, 233.03 feet; thence N00°46'27"W, 488.31 feet; thence N25°43'38"W, 63.14 feet;
thence N34°34'33"W, 29.59 feet; thence N46°28'18"W, 57.86 feet to the True Point of
Beginning, County of Weld, State of Colorado.
And
Lot 11, Block 2, Sekich Business Park, a P.U.D., tract located in the SW1/4 of Section 23,
Township 3 North, Range 68 West of the 6'h P.M., Weld County, Colorado, said tract of land
being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the Northeast Corner of Block 2,
according to the recorded Plat of Sekich Business Park, a P.U.D. Tract located in the SW 1/4 of
Said Section 23, and considering the North line of Block 2 as bearing S89°43'01"W, with all
other bearings contained herein relative thereto; thence along the North line of Block 2,
S89°43'01"W, 522.75 feet to a point on the East right of way line of Hilltop road; thence along
said East right of way line S00°14'44"E, 314.56 feet to the true Point of Beginning; thence
continuing along said East right of way line S00°14'44"E, 295.23 feet more or less to the
Northwest corner of Lot 9, Block 2, Sekich Business Park P.U.D.; thence along the North line of
said Lot 9 N89°42'07"E, 295.35 feet more or less to the Southwest corner of Lot 10, Block 2,
Sekich Business Park P.U.D.; thence along the West line of said Lot 10 N00°46'27"W,297.40
feet; thence S89°16'42"W, 292.61 feet to the True Point of Beginning, County of Weld, State of
Colorado
Order Number: 13331 stewart
ALTA Commitment(6/17/06)—Schedule A •tale guaranty company
Page 2 of 3
SCHEDULE A
STATEMENT OF CHARGES
TO BE DETERMINED
Order Number: 13331 stewart
ALTA Commitment(6/17/06)—Schedule A title guaranty company
Page 3 of 3
COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE
SCHEDULE B —Section 1
REQUIREMENTS
Order Number: 13331
The following are the requirements to be complied with:
1. Payment to or for the account of the grantor(s) or mortgagor(s) of the full consideration for the
estate or interest to be insured.
2. Proper instrument(s) creating the estate or interest to be insured must be executed and duly filed for
record.
3. Evidence satisfactory to Stewart Title Guaranty Company of payment of all outstanding taxes and
assessments as certified by the County Treasurer.
4. Execution of affidavit as to Debts and Liens and its return to Stewart Title Guaranty Company.
5. Payment of any and all Homeowners assessments and expenses which may be assessed to the
property.
6. Execution of an acceptable survey affidavit certifying that there have been no new improvements
constructed or major structural changes made on the subject property.
7. Relating to SNH, LLC, a Colorado Limited Liability Company, The Company requires for its
review the following:
a) Copy of the "Articles of Organization," the Operating Agreement and the regulations of the
limited liability company and any amendments thereof
b) A certificate of good standing, evidencing that the company is in good standing in the state of its
formation
c) Execution of Statement of Authority pursuant to the provisions of Section 38-30-172 C.R.S.
Note: At the time the Company is furnished these items, the Company may make additional
requirements or exceptions.
8. Relating to NSN Group, LLC, a Colorado Limited Liability Company, The Company requires for
its review the following:
a) Copy of the "Articles of Organization," the Operating Agreement and the regulations of the
limited liability company and any amendments thereof
b) A certificate of good standing, evidencing that the company is in good standing in the state of its
formation
c) Execution of Statement of Authority pursuant to the provisions of Section 38-30-172 C.R.S.
Note: At the time the Company is furnished these items, the Company may make additional
requirements or exceptions.
Order Number: 13331 stewart
ALTA Commitment(6/17/06)—Schedule R I
Page I of 2 title guaranty company
9. Deed from SNH,LLC, a Colorado Limited Liability Company to Town of Mead, conveying all
their right, title and interest in and to Lot 10, Block 2, Sekich Business Park, a PUD.
10. Deed from NSN Group, LLC, a Colorado Limited Liability Company to Town of Mead, conveying
all their right, title and interest in Lot 11, Block 2, Sekich Business Park, a PUD.
Order Number: 13331 ste /�/ems rt
ALTA Commitment(6/17/06)—Schedule B l a7`�iYVGY `
Page 2 of 2 --bile guaranty company
COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE
SCHEDULE B -Section 2
EXCEPTIONS
Order Number: 13331
The policy or policies to be insured will contain exceptions to the following unless the same are
disposed of to the satisfaction of the Company:
1. Rights or claims of parties in possession, not shown by the public records.
2. Easements, or claims of easements, not shown by the public records.
3. Any encroachment, encumbrance, violation, variation, or adverse circumstance affecting the title
that would be disclosed by an accurate and complete land survey of the Land and not shown by the
public records.
4. Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor or material heretofore or hereafter furnished,imposed
by law and not shown by the public records.
5. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, if any, created, first appearing the
public records or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof, but prior to the date the
proposed insured acquires of record for value the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by
this commitment.
6. Unpatented mining claims, reservations or exceptions in patents, or in acts authorizing the issuance
thereof.
7. Water rights, claims or title to water.
8. Any and all unpaid taxes and assessments and unredeemed tax sales.
9. Reservation of by Union Pacific Railroad Company all coal and other minerals in the instrument
recorded July 9, 1909 in Book 233 at page 230, together with the appurtenant rights to use the
surface. The Company makes no representation as to the present ownership of this interest.
10. Surface Owners agreement recorded December 13, 1974 at Reception No. 1650216.
11. Reservations, terms and conditions in Warranty Deed recorded July 22, 1971 at Reception No.
1572048.
12. All matters as shown on the Final Plat of Sekich Business Park recorded April 19, 1983 at
Reception No. 1923948.
13. All matters as shown on the Sekich Business Park plat recorded November 12, 1991 at Reception
No. 2268960.
Order No.: 13331
ALTA Commitment Stewaf t
nt(6/17/06) Schedule B 2
Page 1 of 2 title guaranty company
14. All matters as shown on the PUD Rezoning Map of Sekich Business Park Plat recorded April 19,
1983 at Reception NO. 1923946.
15. Terms, provisions, covenants, conditions, restrictions, easements, charges, assessments and liens
provided in the Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions recorded April 25, 1983 at Reception No.
1924535; Addendum recorded April 26, 1983 at Reception No. 1924757; Amendments recorded
July 26, 1989 at Reception No. 2186362 and Amendment recorded December 15, 1994 at
Reception No. 2419226, but omitting any covenant, condition or restriction, if any, based on race,
color, religion, sex, handicap, familial status, or national origin unless and only to the extent that
the covenant, condition or restriction (a) is exempt under Title 42 of the United States Code, or (b)
relates to handicap, but does not discriminate against handicapped persons.
Order No.: 13331 Stewart
ALTA Commitment(6/17/06) Schedule B 2
Page 2 of 2 title guaranty company
DISCLOSURES
Order Number: 13331
Note:Pursuant to C.R.S. 10-11-122, notice is hereby given that:
A. The subject real property may he located in a special taxing district;
B. A certificate of taxes due listing each taxing jurisdiction shall be obtained from the county treasurer or the
county treasurer s authorized agent;
C. Information regarding special districts and the boundaries of such districts may be obtained from the board of
county commissioners, the county clerk and recorder,or the county assessor.
Note: Colorado Division of Insurance Regulations 3-5-1, Subparagraph (7) (E)requires that Every title entity shall
be responsible for all matters which appear of record prior to the time of recording whenever the title entity conducts
the closing and is responsible for recording or filing of legal documents resulting from the transaction which was
closed. Provided that Stewart Title of Colorado, Inc. conducts the closing of the insured transaction and is
responsible for recording the legal documents from the transaction, exception number 5 will not appear on the
Owner s Title Policy and the Lender s Title Policy when issued.
Note: Affirmative Mechanic s Lien Protection for the Owner may be available (typically by deletion of Exception
No. 4 of Schedule B, Section 2 of the Commitment from the Owner s Policy to be issued)upon compliance with the
following conditions:
A. The land described in Schedule A of this commitment must be a single-family residence, which includes a
condominium or townhouse unit.
B. No labor or materials have been furnished by mechanics or materialmen for purposes of construction on
the land described in Schedule A of this Commitment within the past 6 months.
C. The Company must receive an appropriate affidavit indemnifying the Company against unfilled
mechanic s and Materialmen s Liens.
D. The Company must receive payment of the appropriate premium.
E. If there has been construction, improvements or major repairs undertaken on the property to be purchased,
within six months prior to the Date of the Commitment, the requirements to obtain coverage for
unrecorded liens will include: disclosure of certain construction information; financial information as to
the seller, the builder and/or the contractor;payment of the appropriate premium;fully executed Indemnity
agreements satisfactory to the company; and, any additional requirements as may be necessary after an
examination of the aforesaid information by the Company.
No coverage will be given under any circumstances for labor or material for which the insured has contracted for or
agreed to pay.
Note:Pursuant to C.R.S. 10-11-123, notice is hereby given:
A. That there is recorded evidence that a mineral estate has been severed, leased or otherwise conveyed from the
surface estate and that there is a substantial likelihood that a third party holds some or all interest in oil, gas,
other minerals,or geothermal energy in the property; and
B. That such mineral estate may include the right to enter and use the property without the surface owner s
permission.
This notice applies to owner s policy commitments containing a mineral severance instrument exception,or exceptions,
in Schedule B, Section 2.
NOTHING HEREIN CONTAINED WILL BE DEEMED TO OBLIGATE THE COMPANY TO PROVIDE
ANY OF THE COVERAGES REFERRED TO HEREIN UNLESS THE ABOVE CONDITIONS ARE FULLY
SATISFIED.
Order Number: 13331
Disclosures
Stewart Title of Colorado, Inc.
Privacy Policy Notice
PURPOSE OF THIS NOTICE
Title V of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) generally prohibits any financial institution,
directly or through its affiliates, from sharing nonpublic personal information about you with a
nonaffiliated third party unless the institution provides you with a notice of its privacy policies
and practices, such as the type of information that it collects about you and the categories of
persons or entities to whom it may be disclosed. In compliance with the GLBA, we are
providing you with this document, which notifies you of the privacy policies and practices of
Stewart Title of Colorado, Inc.
We may collect nonpublic personal information about you from the following sources:
Information we receive from you, such as on applications or other forms.
Information about your transactions we secure from our files, or from our affiliates or
others.
Information we receive from a consumer reporting agency.
Information that we receive from others involved in your transaction, such as the real
estate agent or lender.
Unless it is specifically stated otherwise in an amended Privacy Policy Notice, no additional
nonpublic personal information will be collected about you.
We may disclose any of the above information that we collect about our customers or former
customers to our affiliates or to nonaffiliated third parties as permitted by law.
We also may disclose this information about our customers or former customers to the
following types of nonaffiliated companies that perform marketing services on our behalf or
with whom we have joint marketing agreements:
Financial service providers such as companies engaged in banking, consumer finance,
securities and insurance.
Non-financial companies such as envelope stuffers and other fulfillment service
providers.
WE DO NOT DISCLOSE ANY NONPUBLIC PERSONAL INFORMATION ABOUT YOU
WITH ANYONE FOR ANY PURPOSE THAT IS NOT SPECIFICALLY PERMITTED BY
LAW.
We restrict access to nonpublic personal information about you to those employees who need
to know that information in order to provide products or services to you. We maintain
physical, electronic, and procedural safeguards that comply with federal regulations to guard
your nonpublic personal information.
Stewart Title Guaranty Company
Privacy Policy Notice
PURPOSE OF THIS NOTICE
Title V of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) generally prohibits any financial institution,
directly or through its affiliates, from sharing nonpublic personal information about you with a
nonaffiliated third party unless the institution provides you with a notice of its privacy policies
and practices, such as the type of information that it collects about you and the categories of
persons or entities to whom it may be disclosed. In compliance with the GLBA, we are
providing you with this document, which notifies you of the privacy policies and practices of
Stewart Title Guaranty Company .
We may collect nonpublic personal information about you from the following sources:
Information we receive from you, such as on applications or other forms.
Information about your transactions we secure from our files, or from our affiliates or
others.
Information we receive from a consumer reporting agency.
Information that we receive from others involved in your transaction, such as the real
estate agent or lender.
Unless it is specifically stated otherwise in an amended Privacy Policy Notice, no additional
nonpublic personal information will be collected about you.
We may disclose any of the above information that we collect about our customers or former
customers to our affiliates or to nonaffiliated third parties as permitted by law.
We also may disclose this information about our customers or former customers to the
following types of nonaffiliated companies that perform marketing services on our behalf or
with whom we have joint marketing agreements:
Financial service providers such as companies engaged in banking, consumer finance,
securities and insurance.
Non-financial companies such as envelope stuffers and other fulfillment service
providers.
WE DO NOT DISCLOSE ANY NONPUBLIC PERSONAL INFORMATION ABOUT YOU
WITH ANYONE FOR ANY PURPOSE THAT IS NOT SPECIFICALLY PERMITTED BY
LAW.
We restrict access to nonpublic personal information about you to those employees who need
to know that information in order to provide products or services to you. We maintain
physical, electronic, and procedural safeguards that comply with federal regulations to guard
your nonpublic personal information.
Stewart Title of Colorado, Inc.
DISCLOSURE
The title company, Stewart Title of Colorado, Inc. - Longmont Division in its capacity as
escrow agent, has been authorized to receive funds and disburse them when all funds
received are either: (a) available for immediate withdrawal as a matter of right from the
financial institution in which the funds are deposited, or (b) are available for immediate
withdrawal as a consequence of an agreement of a financial institution in which the funds
are to be deposited or a financial institution upon which the funds are to be drawn.
The title company is disclosing to you that the financial institution may provide the title
company with computer accounting or auditing services, or other bank services, either
directly or through a separate entity which may or may not be affiliated with the title
company. This separate entity may charge the financial institution reasonable and proper
compensation for these services and retain any profits there from.
The title company may also receive benefits from the financial institution in the form of
advantageous interest rates on loan, sometimes referred to as preferred rate loan
programs, relating to loans the title company has with the financial institution. The title
company shall not be liable for any interest or other charges on the earnest money and
shall be under no duty to invest or reinvest funds held by it at any time. In the event that
the parties to this transaction have agreed to have interest on earnest money deposit
transferred to a fund established for the purpose of providing affordable housing to
Colorado residents, then the earnest money shall remain in an account designated for such
purpose, and the interest money shall be delivered to the title company at closing.
CONDITIONS
I. The term mortgage, when used herein, shall include deed of trust, trust deed, or other security
instrument.
2. If the proposed Insured has or acquired actual knowledge of any defect, lien, encumbrance, adverse
claim or other matter affecting the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this
Commitment other than those shown in Schedule B hereof, and shall fail to disclose such
knowledge to the Company in writing, the Company shall be relieved from liability for any loss or
damage resulting from any act of reliance hereon to the extent the Company is prejudiced by failure
to so disclose such knowledge. If the proposed Insured shall disclose such knowledge to the
Company, or if the Company otherwise acquires actual knowledge of any such defect, lien,
encumbrance, adverse claim or other matter, the Company at its option may amend Schedule B of
this Commitment accordingly, but such amendment shall not relieve the Company from liability
previously incurred pursuant to paragraph 3 of these Conditions and Stipulations.
3. Liability of the Company under this Commitment shall be only to the named proposed Insured and
such parties included under the definition of Insured in the form of policy or policies committed for
and only for actual loss incurred in reliance hereon in undertaking in good faith (a) to comply with
the requirements hereof, or (b) to eliminate exceptions shown in Schedule B, or (c) to acquire or
create the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. In no event shall such
liability exceed the amount stated in Schedule A for the policy or policies committed for and such
liability is subject to the insuring provisions and Conditions and Stipulations and the Exclusions
from Coverage of the form of policy or policies committed for in favor of the proposed Insured
which are hereby incorporated by reference and are made a part of this Commitment except as
expressly modified herein.
4. This Commitment is a contract to issue one or more title insurance policies and is not an abstract of
title or a report of the condition of title. Any action or actions or rights of action that the proposed
Insured may have or may bring against the Company arising out of the status of the title to the estate
or interest or the status of the mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment must be based on and
are subject to the provisions of this Commitment.
5. The policy to be issued contains an arbitration clause. All arbitrable matters when the Amount of
Insurance is $2,000,000 or less shall be arbitrated at the option of either the Company or the
Insured as the exclusive remedy of the parties. You may review a copy of the arbitration rules at<
http://www.alta.orm/>.
stewart
title guaranty company
All notices required to be given the Company and any statement in writing required to be furnished the Company shall be
addressed to it at P.O. Box 2029,Houston,Texas 77252.
Page 1 of 1
Property Owners Within 300 ft. of Parcel# 120723001023
NAME MAILING ADDRESS PARCEL IDENTIFICATION
530 HOLYOKE CT
BENSON FARMS LTD LIABILITY CO 120723400029
FORT COLLINS,CO 80525
COLE FLOYD R & 2467 TULIP ST
120723001027
Additional Owners: LONGMONT,CO 80501
COLE PAMELA B
1110 W LAKE COOK RD STE 220
ESSEX HOLDINGS INC 120723001003
BUFFALO GROVE,IL 60089-1990
4045 SPECIALTY PL
FBVAM INVESTMENTS LLC 120723001019
LONGMONT,CO 80504
4325 HILLTOP RD
NSN GROUP LLC 120723001025
LONGMONT,CO 80504
SEWCZAK KERRY K REVOCABLE 247 SPRINGHILL LANE
TRUST 120723001022
BERTHOUD,CO 80513
4325 HILLTOP
SNH LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY 120723001028
LONGMONT,CO 80504
C/O DIV OF HWYS - STATE OF
STATE DEPT OF HIGHWAYS COLO 120723001010
4201 E ARKANSAS AVE
DENVER,CO 80222
http://maps2.merrick.com/website/weld/setsql.asp 6/27/2008
Envelopes for mailing Notices and Referrals
Will be provided with Final Submittal.
LARGE MAPS AVAILABLE
FOR
VIEWING
AT THE CLERK TO THE BOARD'S
OFFICE, IN THE PUBLIC REVIEW FILE.
Northern Colorado Water Conservancy District Petition
Not Applicable.
SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED
NON-TRIBUTARY AND NOT NON-TRIBUTARY
GROUNDWATER
THIS DEED, made this 25 day of July, 2008, NSN Group, LLC and SNH, LLC of the County
of Weld, State of Colorado, grantors and the Town of Mead, P.O. Box 626, Mead, CO 80542, of the
County of Weld, State of Colorado:
WITNESSETH, that the grantors, for and in consideration of the sum of Ten dollars and other
good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, have-
granted, bargained, sold and conveyed, and by these presents do grant, bargain, sell, convey, and confirm,
unto the grantee and its successors and assigns forever, all the real property, together with improvements, if
any, situate, lying and being in Lot 10, Block 2, Sekich Business Park located in the SW 1/4 of Section 23,
Township 3 North,Range 68 West of the 6th PM, County of Weld, State of Colorado, described as
follows:
All non-tributary and not non-tributary groundwater as defined by C.R.S.
' 37-90-103, whether adjudicated,unadjudicated, permitted or
unpermitted, underlying the property described in Exhibit A, attached
hereto and incorporated by reference herein.
Also known by street and number as: 4400 Mulligan Drive
Assessor's schedule or parcel number: Lot 10, Block 2, Sekich Business Park
TOGETHER with all and singular the hereditaments and appurtenances thereto belonging, or in
anywise appertaining, and the reversion and reversions, remainder and remainders, rents, issues and profits
thereof; and all the estate, right, title, interest, claim and demand whatsoever of the grantor(s), either in law
or equity, of, in and to the above bargained water rights,with the hereditaments and appurtenances;
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the said water rights above bargained and described with the
appurtenances, unto the grantee and its successors and assigns forever. The grantors, for themselves, their
heirs and personal representatives or successors, do covenant and agree that they shall and will
WARRANT AND FOREVER DEFEND the above-bargained water rights in the quiet and peaceable
possession of the grantee, and its successors and assigns, against all and every person or persons claiming
the whole or any part thereof,by, through or under the grantors.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the grantors have executed this deed on the date set forth above.
Date 7-Z$'-O% Signature by l/i.� ,•
Date Signature
MASTER WATEP FIGHT- DEED - -. r E_.;( ,„i, 24, _40'8
STATE OF COLORADO )
SS.
COUNTY OF r)eic )
he fpregoing instrument was acknowledged b�effoo th's r5 • day of
(7cc20Y UCll�c�ytP C/r �
My commission expires: if_ /�J
Witness My hand and official seal.
Notary Public
SHEILA L. GOODMAN
NOTARY PUBLIC
STATE OF COLORADO
My Commissior.. r.:<.,)res 11103/2010
MASTEF WP'EF P;I3HT. JEER - 'IIII'!!-i „_i J_ July 2A. -....
Annexation Impact Report
Not Applicable—Property is less than 10 acres.
LARGE MAPS AVAILABLE
FOR
VIEWING
AT THE CLERK TO THE BOARD'S
OFFICE, IN THE PUBLIC REVIEW FILE.
GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT
PROPOSED ADDITION TO TOTAL CONCRETE SERVICES/LUCHT'S
CONCRETE PUMPING BUILDING
4462 HILLTOP ROAD- LOT 11, BLOCK 2, SEKICH BUSINESS PARK
TOWN OF MEAD, WELD COUNTY, COLORADO
TERRACON PROJECT NO. 22085021
April 1, 2008
Prepared for:
Total Concrete Services
4325 Hilltop Road
Mead, Colorado 80504
Attn: Mr. Al Nissen
Prepared by:
Terracon Consultants, Inc.
1242 Bramwood Place, Suite 2
Longmont, Colorado 80501
Phone: 303-776-3921
Fax: 303-776-4041
lferracon
1ferracon
Consulting Engineers 8 Scientists
April 1, 2008 Terracon Consultants, Inc
1242 Bramwood Place
Longmont,Colorado 80501
Total Concrete Services Phone 303 776 3921
4325 Hilltop Road Fax 303 776 4041
Mead, Colorado 80504 www terracon corn
Attn: Mr. Al Nissen
RE: Geotechnical Engineering Report
Proposed Addition to Total Concrete Services/Lucht's Concrete Pumping
4462 Hilltop Road— Lot 11, Block 2, Sekich Business Park
Town of Mead, Weld County, Colorado
Terracon Project No. 22085021
As requested, Terracon Consultants, Inc. (Terracon) has completed a geotechnical
engineering exploration for the proposed addition to the Total Concrete Services / Lucht's
Concrete Pumping building, located on Lot 11, Block 2 of the Sekich Business Park, at 4462
Hilltop Road in Mead, Colorado. This study was performed in general accordance with our
proposal number G2208021 dated February 21, 2008.
The results of our engineering study, including the boring location diagram, test boring
records, laboratory test results and the geotechnical recommendations needed to aid in the
design and construction of foundations and other earth connected phases of this project are
attached.
Based on the geotechnical engineering analyses, subsurface exploration and laboratory test
results, we recommend that the proposed addition to the existing building be supported on a
spread footing foundation system.
Swell-consolidation tests indicate that the subsurface soils likely to influence slab-on-grade
performance generally have low swell potential when wetted. Slab on grade may be used on
the site provided that some movement can be tolerated.
Existing fills and soft, high moisture content clays were encountered in our test borings.
Existing fill and soft/unstable clays are not suitable for use below spread footing
foundations. In order to use a spread footing foundation, these materials, where present,
will need to be removed and recompacted or replaced below the building footprint.
Delivering Success for Clients and Employees Since 1965
More Than 95 Offices Nationwide
Proposed Addition to Lucht's Concrete Pumping Building lrerracon
4462 Hilltop Road-Lot 11,Block 2,Sekich Business Park
Town of Mead,Weld County,Colorado
Terracon Project No.22085021
Other design and construction recommendations, based upon geotechnical conditions, are
presented in the report. We appreciate being of service to you in the geotechnical
engineering phase of this project, and are prepared to assist you during the construction
phases as well. If you have any questions concerning this report or any of our testing,
observation, design and consulting services, please do not hesitate to contact us.
Sincerely,
TERRACON CONSULTANTS, INC.
p0 REG,S
O •,c, w, 1I
4
Darrel DiCarlo Eric i"�, P.E.
Project Engineer Geotechnical Department Manager
Copies to: Addressee (3)
iii
Proposed Addition to Lucht's Concrete Pumping Building lierracon
4462 Hilltop Road•Lot 11,Block 2,Sekich Business Park
Town of Mead,Weld County,Colorado
Terracon Project No.22085021
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page No.
Letter of Transmittal ii
INTRODUCTION 1
PROJECT DESCRIPTION 1
SITE EXPLORATION PROCEDURES 2
Field Exploration 2
Laboratory Testing 2
SITE CONDITIONS 3
SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS 3
Soil and Bedrock Conditions 3
Field and Laboratory Test Results 4
Groundwater Conditions 4
ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATIONS 4
Geotechnical Considerations 4
Foundation Recommendations 5
Floor Slabs 7
Earthwork 9
General Considerations 9
Site Preparation 9
Subgrade Preparation 9
Fill Materials and Placement 10
Excavation and Trench Construction 11
Additional Design and Construction Considerations 11
Exterior Slabs 11
Underground Utilities 12
Corrosion Protection (Concrete) 12
Surface Drainage 12
GENERAL COMMENTS 13
iv
Proposed Addition to Lucht's Concrete Pumping Building lierracon
4462 Hilltop Road-Lot 11,Block 2,Sekich Business Park
Town of Mead,Weld County,Colorado
Terracon Project No.22085021
TABLE OF CONTENTS (Cont'd)
APPENDIX A
Boring Location Diagram Al
Logs of Borings A2 to A3
APPENDIX B
Swell-Consolidation Test Curves B1 to B6
Grain Size Distribution/Soil Classification Curve B7
APPENDIX C:
General Notes: Drilling & Exploration Cl
Unified Soil Classification C2
Rock Classification C3
V
GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT
PROPOSED ADDITION TO TOTAL CONCRETE SERVICES /
LUCHT'S CONCRETE PUMPING BUILDING
4462 HILLTOP ROAD- LOT 11, BLOCK 2, SEKICH BUSINESS PARK
TOWN OF MEAD, WELD COUNTY, COLORADO
TERRACON PROJECT NO. 22085021
April 1, 2008
INTRODUCTION
This report contains the results of our geotechnical engineering exploration for the proposed
addition to the Total Concrete Services / Lucht's Concrete Pumping building, located on Lot
11, Block 2 of the Sekich Business Park at 4462 Hilltop Road, in Mead, Colorado. The site
is located in the Southwest IA of Section 23, Township 3 North, Range 68 West of the 6th
Principal Meridian in Weld County, Colorado.
The purpose of these services is to provide information and geotechnical engineering
recommendations relative to:
• Subsurface soil and bedrock conditions
• Groundwater conditions
• Foundation design and construction
• Floor slab design and construction
• General earthwork considerations
• Site drainage considerations
The recommendations contained in this report are based upon the results of field and
laboratory testing, engineering analyses, experience with similar soil conditions and
structures, and our understanding of the proposed project.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Based on information provided, the proposed project will include the construction of an
addition to the existing building at 4462 Hilltop Road, Lot 11 Block 2 of the Sekich Business
Park in Mead, Colorado. The addition will encompass about 5,400 square feet in plan area
1
Proposed Addition to Lucht's Concrete Pumping Building lierracon
4462 Hilltop Road-Lot 11,Block 2,Sekich Business Park
Town of Mead,Weld County,Colorado
Terracon Project No.22085021
and will be a single-story, slab-on-grade structure with a mezzanine level, using steel
framing and metal siding construction. Foundation loads were not available at the time this
report was prepared. For our analysis, we have estimated maximum continuous wall and
column/point foundation loads to be on the order of 2 to 3 kips per linear foot and 100 to
125 kips, respectively. Ground level floor loads are anticipated to be light.
Final site grading plans were not available for review prior to preparation of this report.
However, we understand that the ground level floor will be constructed to match the
elevation of the existing building. We estimate that this will involve cuts and/or fills or the
order of 1 to 2 feet in order to achieve floor slab construction grades. If foundation or floor
loads or type or depth of construction vary from those outlined above, or if location of
construction changes, we should be contacted to confirm and/or modify our
recommendations accordingly.
SITE EXPLORATION PROCEDURES
Field Exploration: Two test borings were drilled on February 29, 2008. The borings were
drilled to depths of about 20 to 25 feet below existing grade at the approximate locations
shown on the Boring Location Diagram, Figure 1. The borings were advanced with a truck-
mounted drilling rig, utilizing 4-inch diameter solid stem auger.
The borings were located in the field by pacing or measurements with a mechanical
surveying wheel using existing building corners and/or other site features as a reference.
Right angles for locating the borings were estimated. Approximate ground surface
elevations at each boring location were obtained by measurements with an engineer's level
and rod from a temporary bench mark (TBM) shown on the Boring Location Diagram. The
accuracy of boring locations and elevations should only be assumed to the level implied by
the methods used.
Lithologic logs of each boring were recorded by the geotechnical engineer during the drilling
operations. At selected intervals, samples of the subsurface materials were taken by
means of driving a California barrel sampler. Penetration resistance measurements were
obtained by driving the California barrel into the subsurface materials with a 140-pound
hammer falling 30 inches. The penetration resistance value is a useful index in estimating
the consistency, relative density, or hardness of the materials encountered. In addition,
groundwater levels were recorded in each boring at the time of site exploration and, where
possible, three days after completion of drilling.
Laboratory Testing: Samples retrieved during the field exploration were returned to the
laboratory for observation by the project geotechnical engineer and were visually classified
2
Proposed Addition to Lucht's Concrete Pumping Building lierracon
4462 Hilltop Road-Lot 11,Block 2,Sekich Business Park
Town of Mead,Weld County,Colorado
Terracon Project No.22085021
in general accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System described in Appendix C.
Samples of bedrock were classified in accordance with the general notes for Rock
Classification. An applicable laboratory testing program was formulated to determine
engineering properties of the subsurface materials, after which, the field descriptions were
confirmed or modified as necessary. Boring logs were prepared and are presented in
Appendix A.
Laboratory tests were conducted on selected samples and are presented in Appendix B.
The test results were used for the geotechnical engineering analyses and the development
of foundation and earthwork recommendations. Laboratory tests were performed in general
accordance with applicable local standards or other accepted standards.
Selected samples were tested for the following engineering properties:
• Water Content •
• Grain Size Distribution
• Dry Unit Weight •
• Atterberg Limits
• Swell-Consolidation Potential •
Water Soluble Sulfate Content
• Unconfined Compressive Strength
SITE CONDITIONS
The site is currently occupied by the existing Lucht's Concrete Pumping building, a single to
two-story pre-engineered steel building. The project is located on Lot 11, Block 2 of the
Sekich Business Park, on the east side of Hilltop Road in the Town of Mead, Colorado. In
general, the site is surrounded by commercial and/or light industrial development. The
ground is gravel surfaced across the majority of the proposed building addition area and is
generally even, with a slight slope downward to the south and east. The surrounding areas
are mostly used for parking and/or equipment storage. A small, concrete-lined irrigation
ditch was noted near the eastern property boundary. This ditch did not contain water at the
time of our exploration.
SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS
Soil and Bedrock Conditions: As presented on the Logs of Borings, approximately 6
inches of gravel was encountered at the surface of Boring 1. Soils to a depth of about 7
feet consisted of lean clays with varying amounts of sand and silt, encountered as both
man-made fills and in native states. Existing fill was encountered in Boring 2 and extended
from the ground surface to a depth of about 4 feet below present site grade. The materials
underlying the surface soils and extending to the maximum depth of exploration consisted
3
Proposed Addition to Lucht's Concrete Pumping Building lrerracan
4462 Hilltop Road-Lot 11,Block 2,Sekich Business Park
Town of Mead,Weld County,Colorado
Terracon Project No.22085021
of clayey siltstone to interbedded sandstone/claystone/siltstone bedrock. For more detailed
descriptions of the subsurface conditions, please refer to the individual boring logs.
Field and Laboratory Test Results: Field test results indicate that the clay soils (fills and
native) vary from very stiff to soft in consistency. The bedrock varies from weathered to
very hard in hardness.
Laboratory test results indicate that the clay soils have low swell potential and low to
moderate compressibility (settlement potential) under light to moderate loads. The dry
density of the clays varied between 83 to 106 pcf at moisture contents ranging from 19 to 35
percent. Unconfined compressive strength of clay samples tested varied from 740 to 4,860
psf. The clayey siltstone and interbedded sandstone/claystone/siltstone bedrock is
considered to be non-expansive or have low swell potential.
Groundwater Conditions: Groundwater was observed at depths of about 18% to 19 feet
below grade in the test borings at the time of field exploration. When checked three days
after drilling, groundwater was measured at a depth of about 10 feet below present site
grade in Boring 2. Boring 1 had been backfilled by others; however, the in-situ moisture
content of the clay sample taken from Boring 1 indicates that groundwater is likely present
at about 4 to 5 feet below present site grade or may have been at or near this level
sometime in the past. These observations represent groundwater conditions at the time of
the field exploration, and may not be indicative of other times, or at other locations.
Groundwater conditions can change_ with varying seasonal and weather conditions, and
other factors.
ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATIONS
Geotechnical Considerations: Based on the geotechnical conditions encountered in our
test borings, the site appears suitable for the proposed construction provided certain
precautions and design and construction recommendations outlined in this report are
followed. We anticipate that low swelling clays will be encountered in the excavation. Existing
fills and soft/unstable, high moisture content clays were encountered in our test borings and
will require special attention during construction.
Considering the size and type of construction planned and the subsurface conditions
encountered in our test borings, we believe that the proposed addition can be supported on a
spread footing foundation.
Swell-consolidation test results and physical properties indicate that the clay soils on the site
have low swell potential when wetted. Based on this data, we judge the soils on this site to
4
Proposed Addition to Lucht's Concrete Pumping Building lierracon
4462 Hilltop Road-Lot 11,Block 2,Sekich Business Park
Town of Mead,Weld County,Colorado
Terracon Project No.22085021
fall within the "Low" slab performance risk category as defined by CAGE (Colorado
Association of Geotechnical Engineers). Consequently, we believe slabs-on-grade can be
supported on the site soils provided some movement can be tolerated. Slab movement on
the order of 1 inch is possible, and would be considered normal for soils like those found at
this site.
As discussed previously, existing man-made fills and soft/unstable clays were encountered in
our test borings. Existing fill and soft/unstable clays are not suitable for support of spread
footing foundations. These materials, where present, will need to be removed and
recompacted or replaced below foundations. Shallow groundwater may be present on the
site at a depth of about 4 to 5 feet below current site grade near Boring 1. Excavations in
the vicinity of the northwest corner of the building addition should be limited to about 2 feet
below present site grade, or as shallow as possible, in order to reduce construction
complications associated with shallow groundwater and associated low strength soils.
Areas of low strength or otherwise unsuitable soils could be encountered below slabs and/or
at foundation bearing depth and these conditions may require some corrective work such as
removal and re-compaction or replacement with imported granular soils or gravel.
Support of floor slabs on or above existing fill soils is discussed in this report. However,
even with the recommended construction testing services, there is an inherent risk for the
owner that compressible fill or unsuitable material within or buried by the fill will not be
discovered. This risk cannot be eliminated without completely removing and replacing the
fill below the building footprint, but can generally be reduced to a reasonable level by
thorough exploration and proper testing and observation during construction.
Grades must provide effective drainage away from the structure during and after
construction. Water permitted to pond next to the structure can result in greater soil
movements than those discussed in this report. These greater movements can result in
unacceptable differential slab movements, cracked slabs and walls, and other structural or
architectural defects. Estimated movements described in this report are based on effective
drainage for the life of the structures and cannot be relied upon if effective drainage is not
maintained.
Recommendations for the design and construction of foundations, floor slabs and
foundation drainage are outlined in the following sections.
Foundation Recommendations: Considering the size and type of construction planned
and the subsurface conditions encountered in our test borings, we believe that spread
footings can be used for support of the proposed building addition. These
recommendations are applicable for maximum continuous wall and column/point foundation
5
Proposed Addition to Lucht's Concrete Pumping Building Terracon
4462 Hilltop Road-Lot 11, Block 2,Sekich Business Park
Town of Mead,Weld County,Colorado
Terracon Project No.22085021
loads up to 2 to 3 klf and 100 to 125 kips, respectively. If higher loading is anticipated, we
should be contacted to review and possibly revise our recommendations. Footings should
bear upon undisturbed natural soils or on engineered fill tested and approved by Terracon
and may be designed for a maximum net allowable soil bearing pressure of 1,500 pounds
per square foot (psf). The design bearing pressure applies to dead loads plus design live
load conditions. Exterior footings and foundations in unheated areas must be protected
from frost action. The normal depth of frost protection in this area is assumed to be around
36 inches.
To reduce the potential of "pumping" and softening of the foundation soils and the
requirement for corrective work, we recommend the excavation be completed remotely with
a track-hoe.
Areas of soft/unstable, high moisture content clays (such as those encountered in Boring 1
at a depth of about 4 feet) may be encountered at foundation bearing depth after the
excavation is completed for footings. When such conditions exist beneath planned footing
areas, stabilization will be required. Soft soils should be removed to minimum depths and
horizontally beyond the edge of footings as determined by the geotechnical engineer and
should be replaced with washed gravel or granular fill which has been approved by
Terracon.
Existing fill on the site should not be used for support of foundations without removal and
recompaction. Where soils are loosened during excavation or in the forming process for the
footings, they should be removed or re-compacted to at least 95 percent of the standard
Proctor maximum dry density (ASTM D698) at 1 percent below to 3 percent above optimum
moisture content.
Where practical, we recommend that the addition be constructed structurally independent of
the existing building in order to mitigate the effects of possible differential movement
between the structures. The influence and interaction of existing and proposed footings on
the foundation soils should be considered. This should be taken into account in the design
of the proposed additions. Care should be taken during construction to avoid affecting the
foundation of the existing and adjacent structure. This may require shoring of excavations
or underpinning of existing foundations to protect the structural integrity of the existing
building.
Footings should be proportioned to reduce differential foundation movement. Proportioning
on the basis of relative constant dead-load pressure can provide a means to reduce
differential movement between adjacent footings. Total movement of footings designed and
constructed in accordance with the above criteria is estimated to be on the order of about 1
6
Proposed Addition to Lucht's Concrete Pumping Building lierracon
4462 Hilltop Road-Lot 11,Block 2,Sekich Business Park
Town of Mead,Weld County,Colorado
Terracon Project No.22085021
inch. Differential movement could approach about 1/2 to '/, of the estimated total movement
Additional foundation movements could occur if water from any source infiltrates the
foundation soils; therefore, proper drainage away from the foundation system should be
provided in the final design, during construction and maintained throughout the life of the
facility.
Footings, foundations and walls should be reinforced as necessary to reduce the potential
for distress caused by differential foundation movement. Foundation excavations should be
observed by the geotechnical engineer to confirm that satisfactory bearing materials are
present and that subsurface conditions are consistent with those encountered in our
borings. If the soil conditions encountered differ significantly from those presented in this
report, supplemental recommendations will be required.
Floor Slabs: Swell-consolidation test results indicate that the clay soils on the site have low
swell potential when wetted. Based on this data and on our experience in the area we judge
the clay soils on this site to fall within the "Low" slab performance risk category as defined
by CAGE (Colorado Association of Geotechnical Engineers). Consequently, we believe
slabs-on-grade can be supported on the site soils provided some movement can be
tolerated. Slab movement on the order of 1 inch is possible and would be considered
normal for soils like those found at this site. If slab movement can not be accepted or must
be reduced, we are available to discuss slab movement mitigation techniques, at your
request.
As mentioned previously, around 4 feet of existing fill was encountered Boring 2. We are
not aware whether the fill was placed under the testing and observation of a geotechnical
engineer It is possible that zones or layers of poorly compacted fill may be encountered on
the site or unsuitable materials (such as organics and construction debris) may be present
within or buried by the fill. The existing fill will present a risk of settlement for on grade slabs
or other features constructed near the ground surface. This risk cannot be eliminated
without completely removing and replacing the fill, but can generally be reduced to a
reasonable level by thorough exploration and proper testing and observation during
construction. If the owner is willing to accept the risk of slab movement related to
settlement of the existing fills, then a portion of the in-place fill could be left below on grade
slabs. We suggest at least the upper 18 inches of the existing fill be removed or scarified
and re-compacted beneath slabs. However, it should be recognized that this alternative will
not eliminate slab settlement due to the presence of the underlying fill and that leaving a
portion of the existing fill soils below slabs would involve a risk of greater than normal post-
construction settlement.
7
Proposed Addition to Lucht's Concrete Pumping Building lierracon
4462 Hilltop Road-Lot 11,Block 2,Sekich Business Park
Town of Mead,Weld County,Colorado
Terracon Project No.22085021
For structural design of concrete slabs-on-grade, a modulus of subgrade reaction of 100
pounds per cubic inch (pci) may be used for floors supported on properly compacted fill
consisting of the on-site clay soils. A modulus of 150 pci may be used for floors supported
on at least 8 inches of non-expansive imported granular fill approved by Terracon.
Additional floor slab design and construction recommendations are as follows:
• As a precautionary measure, we suggest a minimum 1%-inch void space be
constructed above, or below non-bearing partition walls placed on the floor slab.
Special framing details and/or connections should be provided at door-jambs and
frames within partition walls to avoid potential distortion. Partition walls should be
isolated from suspended ceilings.
• Positive separations and/or isolation joints should be provided between slabs and all
foundations, columns or utility lines to allow independent movement.
• Frequent control joints should be provided in slabs to control the location and extent
of cracking.
• Fill/backfill placed beneath slabs and exterior to the foundation walls/grade beams
should be moisture conditioned at optimum or above and should be well compacted.
• In areas subjected to normal loading, we suggest the provision of a minimum 4-inch
layer of clean-graded gravel or aggregate base course beneath interior slabs. This
material can help to distribute floor loads and can act as a capillary break. For
heavy loading, reevaluation of slab and/or base course thickness may be required.
Slab reinforcement and thickness should be designed based on the actual loads
imposed and on the intended slab use.
a The use of a vapor retarder should be considered beneath concrete slabs on grade
that will be covered with wood, tile, carpet or other moisture sensitive or impervious
coverings, or when the slab will support equipment sensitive to moisture. When
conditions warrant the use of a vapor retarder, the slab designer and slab contractor
should refer to ACI 302 for procedures and cautions regarding the use and
placement of a vapor retarder.
• Floor slabs should not be constructed on frozen subgrade
• Other design and construction considerations, as outlined in the ACI Design Manual,
Section 302.1R are recommended.
8
Proposed Addition to Lucht's Concrete Pumping Building Terracon
4462 Hilltop Road-Lot 11,Block 2,Sekich Business Park
Town of Mead,Weld County,Colorado
Terracon Project No.22085021
Earthwork:
General Considerations: The following presents recommendations for site preparation,
excavation, subgrade preparation and placement of engineered fills on the project
Earthwork on the project should be observed and evaluated by Terracon. The
evaluation of earthwork should include observation and testing of engineered fill,
subgrade preparation, foundation bearing soils, and other geotechnical conditions
exposed during the construction of the project.
Site Preparation: Strip and remove any vegetation and debris from proposed building
areas. Existing fills should also be removed from below proposed foundations and, if
desired to reduce the potential for movement related to leaving the existing fills in place,
slab areas. Stripped materials consisting of vegetation and organic materials should be
wasted from the site, or used to revegetate landscaped areas or exposed slopes after
completion of grading operations.
Existing concrete flatwork should be removed from within the proposed construction
area. This should also include removal of any loose backfill or fills. Materials derived
from the demolition of existing concrete flatwork should be removed from the site, and
not be allowed for use in any on-site fills.
Exposed areas which will receive fill, once properly cleared, should be proof-rolled to
delineate weak or disturbed areas at or near subgrade level. Weak areas should be
corrected prior to fill placement.
If unexpected fills or underground facilities are encountered, such features should be
removed and the excavation thoroughly cleaned prior to backfill placement and/or
construction.
Penetration resistance measurements and in-situ moisture contents indicate that the clay
soils are susceptible to disturbance and loss of strength under repeated wheel loads_ This
condition can lead to "pumping" soils and unstable subgrades could develop. If unstable
conditions develop during earthwork activities or foundation construction, some method of
soil improvement or stabilization will be needed prior to fill placement or foundation and
slab construction. In any event, we feel the appropriate method and level of stabilization
(if any) should be evaluated and can best be determined on a case-by-case basis during
construction.
Subgrade Preparation: Existing fills and soft/unstable, high moisture content and/or
disturbed clays may be encountered at foundation bearing depth after excavation is
9
Proposed Addition to Lucht's Concrete Pumping Building Terracon
4462 Hilltop Road-Lot 11,Block 2,Sekich Business Park
Town of Mead,Weld County,Colorado
Terracon Project No.22085021
completed for footings. When such conditions exist beneath planned footing areas, they
should be removed and re-compacted or replaced with approved engineered fill.
Subgrade soils beneath interior and exterior slabs should be scarified, moisture
conditioned and compacted to a minimum depth of 18 inches where existing fills remain
below slabs and 12 inches for native soils. The moisture content and compaction of
subgrade soils should be maintained until slab construction. Prior to slab construction,
the subgrade should be proof-rolled in the presence of the geotechnical engineer to
delineate sofUloose or disturbed areas at or near subgrade level. Heavy construction
equipment such as a loaded water truck or tandem axle dump truck can be used for
proofrolling. Unsuitable areas should be over-excavated and replaced with suitable fill if
the affected soils cannot be moisture adjusted and densified in place or they should be
stabilized by other suitable methods.
Fill Materials and Placement: Clean on-site soils or imported soils approved by the
geotechnical engineer may be used as fill and/or backfill on the site.
Imported soils (if needed) should be evaluated and approved by the geotechnical
engineer prior to delivery to the site. In general, imported materials meeting the
following properties should be acceptable for use on the site.
Percent finer by weight
Gradation (ASTM C136),
6" 100
3" 70-100
No. 4 Sieve 50-100
No. 200 Sieve 30 (max)
• Liquid Limit 25 (max)
• Plasticity Index 6 (max)
Engineered fill should be placed and compacted in horizontal lifts, using equipment and
procedures that will produce recommended moisture contents and densities throughout
the lift. Common fill and/or backfill on the site should be compacted to at least 95
percent of the standard Proctor maximum dry density (ASTM D698). Fill below
foundations should be compacted to at least 95 percent of the standard Proctor
maximum dry density (ASTM D698).
10
Proposed Addition to Lucht's Concrete Pumping Building lierracon
4462 Hilltop Road-Lot 11,Block 2,Sekich Business Park
Town of Mead,Weld County,Colorado
Terracon Project No.22085021
On-site clay soils should be compacted within a moisture content range of 1 percent
below to 3 percent above optimum unless modified by the project geotechnical
engineer. Imported soils meeting the above specifications should be compacted within
a moisture content range of 3 percent below to 2 percent above optimum.
Excavation and Trench Construction: Excavations will likely encounter existing clay
fills, soft/low strength clays and possibly groundwater. Groundwater seepage into
excavations is possible for excavations approaching about 4 to 5 feet below current site
grade. To reduce the potential of "pumping" and softening of the foundation soils and
the requirement for corrective work, we recommend the excavation be completed
remotely with a track-hoe. If seepage occurs or rain or snow-melt water develops, it
should be removed as soon as possible. Control of water in the excavation (if any)
should be feasible with sump pits and pumps.
The individual contractor(s) is responsible for designing and constructing stable,
temporary excavations, as required, to maintain stability of the excavation sides and
bottom as well as adjacent structures. Excavations should be sloped or shored in the
interest of safety following local and federal regulations, including current OSHA
excavation and trench safety standards. If excavations extend to a depth greater than 20
feet, according to OSHA regulations, the side slopes must be designed by a professional
engineer. As a safety measure, it is recommended that vehicles and soil piles be kept to a
minimum lateral distance from the crest of the slope equal to no less than the slope height.
The soils to be penetrated by the proposed excavations may vary significantly across
the site. The preliminary soil classifications are based solely on the materials
encountered in widely spaced exploratory test borings. The contractor should verify that
similar conditions exist throughout the proposed area of excavation. If different
subsurface conditions are encountered at the time of construction, the actual conditions
should be evaluated to determine any excavation modifications necessary to maintain
safe conditions.
Additional Design and Construction Considerations
Exterior Slabs: Exterior slabs-on-grade, exterior architectural features, and utilities
founded on the site soils or in backfill will probably experience some movement due to the
volume change of the material. Fill/backfill consisting of the on-site soils can be expected
to settle about '/� to 1 percent of its original height even when properly compacted.
Potential movement could be reduced by:
• Minimizing moisture increases in the backfill
11
Proposed Addition to Lucht's Concrete Pumping Building lferracon
4462 Hilltop Road-Lot 11,Block 2,Sekich Business Park
Town of Mead,Weld County,Colorado
Terracon Project No.22085021
• Controlling moisture-density during placement of backfill
• Increasing the degree of compaction
• Using designs which allow vertical movement between the exterior
features and adjoining structural elements
• Placing effective control joints on relatively close centers
Underground Utilities: If water is encountered or develops during excavation,
temporary dewatering will be required during pipe placement and backfilling operations
for proper construction. Utility trenches should be excavated on safe and stable slopes
in accordance with OSHA regulations. Backfill should consist of the on-site soil,
processed bedrock or approved imported materials. The pipe backfill should be
compacted to at least 95 percent of the standard Proctor maximum dry density (ASTM
D698). It is strongly recommended that a representative of the geotechnical engineer
provide full-time observation and compaction testing of trench backfill within building
areas.
Underground piping within or near the proposed structure should be designed and
constructed so minor deviations in alignment do not result in breakage or distress.
Utility knockouts in grade beams should be oversized to accommodate differential
movements.
Corrosion Protection (Concrete): We measured the soluble sulfate concentration for a
representative sample of the subsoils which will likely be in contact with structural
concrete. The sulfate concentration measured in the sample was 105 ppm. ACI rates
the measured concentration as being a negligible risk of concrete sulfate attack and
therefore Type I Portland cement should be suitable for concrete on and below grade.
However, if there is no, or minimal cost differential, use of Type II Portland cement
should be considered for additional sulfate resistance of construction concrete.
Foundation concrete should be designed in accordance with the provisions of the AC/
Design Manual, Section 318, Chapter 4.
Surface Drainage: Grades must be adjusted to provide positive drainage away from the
structure during construction and maintained throughout the life of the proposed facility.
Maintenance of surface drainage is important subsequent to construction and becomes
the responsibility of the owner. Infiltration of water into utility or foundation excavations
must be prevented during and after construction. Landscaped irrigation adjacent to the
foundation system should be minimized.
Exposed ground should be sloped at approximately 5 percent grade for at least 10 feet
beyond the perimeter of the building, where practical. The ground surface should be
12
Proposed Addition to Lucht's Concrete Pumping Building iferracon
4462 Hilltop Road-Lot 11,Block 2,Sekich Business Park
Town of Mead,Weld County,Colorado
Terracon Project No.22085021
sloped in such a manner that water will not pond between or adjacent to flatwork,
pavements or structures. Backfill against footings, exterior walls and in utility and sprinkler
line trenches should be well compacted and free of construction debris to reduce moisture
infiltration.
Planters located adjacent to the structure should preferably be self-contained. Sprinkler
mains and spray heads should not be installed or allowed to discharge within 5 feet of
foundation walls. Roof drains should discharge on flatwork or pavements or be extended
away from the structure a minimum of 5 feet through the use of splash blocks or
downspout extensions.
GENERAL COMMENTS
Terracon should be retained to review the final design plans and specifications so
comments can be made regarding interpretation and implementation of our geotechnical
recommendations in the design and specifications. Terracon also should be retained to
provide observation and testing services during grading, excavation, foundation construction
and other earth-related construction phases of the project.
The analysis and recommendations presented in this report are based upon the data
obtained from the borings performed at the indicated locations and from other information
discussed in this report. This report does not reflect variations that may occur between
borings, across the site, or due to the modifying effects of weather. The nature and extent
of such variations may not become evident until during or after construction. If variations
appear, we should be immediately notified so that further evaluation and supplemental
recommendations can be provided.
The scope of services for this project does not include either specifically or by implication
any environmental or biological (e.g., mold, fungi, bacteria) assessment of the site or
identification or prevention of pollutants, hazardous materials or conditions. If the owner is
concerned about the potential for such contamination or pollution, other studies should be
undertaken
This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of our client for specific application to
the project discussed and has been prepared in accordance with generally accepted
geotechnical engineering practices. No warranties, either express or implied, are intended
or made. Site safety, excavation support, and dewatering requirements are the
responsibility of others In the event that changes in the nature, design, or location of the
project as outlined in this report are planned, the conclusions and recommendations
13
Proposed Addition to Lucht's Concrete Pumping Building lrerracon
4462 Hilltop Road-Lot 11,Block 2,Sekich Business Park
Town of Mead,Weld County,Colorado
Terracon Project No.22085021
contained in this report shall not be considered valid unless Terracon reviews the changes
and either verifies or modifies the conclusions of this report in writing_
14
r
® § B k § $ (
D10'619
E - _
m§\ J :
u4e/ !
°dz o2 ; ! !
)§%/ z
2�@ §cam p c
22§) U U /
— Zr§ / �
) ,3 K j
ugvom
,----
` I /S� Q m3
I e/� / A � uu
\m ` i � a a
1 I Eqo k
® ® f ! Icuo,\
%\F.-. - - - - - - - - - - — . . G,
I |
I I w
+ !)
| ` |/ 9 )jai
m-
� � § !. _I %2}
| P .
| \§\
+ !
- - — - - — - - 0- ! I \f,
o w9M / k)k
�,al
§ §2 i
7j/
§|
»
) -.
2/§
LOG OF TEST BORING NO. TB-1 Page 1 of i `
CLIENT
Total Concrete Services
SITE Lot 11,Block 2,Sekich Business Park PROJECT
Town of Mead, Colorado Proposed Addition to 4462 Hilltop Road
Boring Location: NW Corner of Addition SAMPLES TESTS
U, J J
c Z W N O
DESCRIPTION 2 >- po Zy= o�n
W c Z ~ I%W~ oc
S W W > r, KW Z Z�W J ❑
t Approx. Surface Elev.: 98.5 ft o o w o a o ra k z o o
� Wa 3v oa E(U, yNJ
V5 GRAVEL SURFACED PARKING LOT
,Approximately 6 inches.
%%%/� LEAN CLAY
with trace SAND, brown, olive brown, very CL CB 18/12 21 106 4860 +0.7/250
4 stiff.
94.5
SANDY SILTY CLAY - CL CB 5/12 35 83 740 +0.0/250
• tan, beige, cream, soft to medium stiff, 5 ML
calcareous, "wet lense"at about 4 to 5 feet
• 7 91.5 —
Clavev SILTSTONE
gray, olive brown, rust/orange,weathered
to very hard,with lenticular CLAYSTONE
interbeds in upper part, varies to — CB 50/11 18 109 +0.7/1000
interbedded 10
SANDSTONE/CLAYSTONE/SILTSTONE
with depth —
•
CB 50/6 17 102 +0.1/1500
15
4
CB 50/6 13 108
20
25 735 — CB NR 50/1
Bottom of Test Boring 25
t
0
u
z
0
aV
R
W
The stratification lines represent the approximate boundary lines
between soil and rock types: in-situ,the transition may be gra
WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS, ftBORING STARTED 2.29.08 WL 17 0 WL y 18.5 2/29 B'fd 3/3 ir BOerr acon R G CME-55 FOREMAN
RING COMPLETED
2-29-08
DJD
WL APPROVED ESW JOB# 22085021
LOG OF TEST BORING NO. TB-2 Page 1 of 1 \
CLIENT
Total Concrete Services
SITE Lot 11, Block 2,Sekich Business Park PROJECT
Town of Mead,Colorado Proposed Addition to 4462 Hilltop Road
Boring Location. SE Corner of Addition SAMPLES TESTS
J J
ce
DESCRIPTION i zN= ��
aH CO U w0 iu ® u- >- (pawWKd
ct
Approx. Surface Elev.. 99.5 ft o ' r L a s c?)
o a r~n N
EXISTING FILL —
LEAN CLAY with BEDROCK fragments, —
brown, black, rust, gray, very stiff, trace
GRAVEL. CB 27/12 19 106 +0-1/250
i4 95.5 -
LEAN CLAY - CL CB 13/12 20 104 3330 +0.2/500
with trace SAND, brown, olive brown, stiff. 5
7 92.5
- Clayey SILTSTONE
_ olive brown, gray, rust/orange,weathered to very hard, varies to interbedded —
• SANDSTONE/CLAYSTONE/SILTSTONE. - CB 50/4 16
10 -
CB NR 50/2
15
• y
4 -
20 79.5 - CB 50/9 21 107
20
a
u
0
0
aV
a
W
F
F5 The stratification lines represent the approximate boundary lines
between soil and rock types: in-situ,the transition may be gradual
g WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS, ft BORING STARTED 2-29-08
WWL L Y 19 2/29 s 10 3/3 ir err acon RIG BORING COMPLETEDME55FOREMAN 2-29-08
m�WL APPROVED ESW JOB# 22085021
10
8
6
4
J
W
co
2
o• _2
I—
Q
O
O
p -4
U
_6
-8
-10
0 1 1 10 100
APPLIED PRESSURE, ksf
Specimen Identification Classification Yd, pcf WC,%
0
• TB-1 2.0ft LEAN CLAY (CL) 106 21
C,
z
0
p Notes Water Added to Sample at 250 psf
= SWELL/CONSOLIDATION TEST
h 1 rerracon Project
ite Proposed Addition to 4462 Hilltop Road
T
o Site Lot 11, Block 2, Sekich Business Park Town of Mead, Colorado
O Job#: 22085021
Date: 3-7-08
10
8
6
4
(J)
W
2
e 1
O _2
a
co
-4_
-6-
-8
-10
0.1 1 10 100
APPLIED PRESSURE, ksf
Specimen Identification Classification Yd, pcf WC,%
•I TB-1 4.0ft SANDY SILTY CLAY(CL-ML) 83 35
0
Notes: Water Added to Sample at 250 psf.
SWELL/CONSOLIDATION TEST
irerracon Project. Proposed Addition to 4462 Hilltop Road
Site: Lot 11, Block 2, Sekich Business Park Town of Mead, Colorado
0 Job# 22085021
Date: 3-7-08
10
8
6
4
-J
yW
N
2
z
3 -2
Q OO
J
O
Co
Z -4
U
-6
-8
-10
0_1 1 10 100
APPLIED PRESSURE,ksf
Specimen Identification Classification t3, pcf WC,%
•I TB-1 9.0ft Clayey SILTSTONE 109 18
0
0
O
p Notes Water Added to Sample at 1,000 psf
SWELL/CONSOLIDATION TEST
1 irerracon Project: Proposed Addition to Hilltop Road
Site: Lot 11, Block 2, Sekich Business Town
Park Town of Mead, Colorado
O Job# 22085021
Date: 3-7-08
10
8
6 .
4 -
J
W
2
0•--
z
o -2-
I
J
O
O Z -4
C)
-6
-8
-10 -
0.1 1 10 100
APPLIED PRESSURE, ksf
Specimen Identification Classification Yd, pcf WC,%
•I TB-1 14.0ft Clayey SILTSTONE 102 17
a
0
0
Notes Water Added to Sample at 1,500 psf
SWELL/CONSOLIDATION TEST
Project- Proposed Addition to 4462 Hilltop Road
erracon Site Lot 11, Block 2, Sekich Business Park Town of Mead, Colorado
o Job#: 22085021
Date. 3-7-08
10
8
6 -
J 4 -
J
2
i -2-4
-6
-8
-10
0 1 1 10 100
APPLIED PRESSURE, ksf
Specimen Identification Classification Yd, pcf WC,%
_! TB-2 2.0ft FILL; LEAN CLAY with BEDROCK fragments 106 19
cr
cr
Notes Water Added to Sample at 250 psf
(9.
N
O
O
SWELL/CONSOLIDATION TEST
Project. Proposed Addition to 4462 Hilltop Road
1 ferracon Site: Lot 11, Block 2, Sekich Business Park Town of Mead, Colorado
0
Job# 22085021
Date: 3-7-08
10
8
6
J 4
J
L4
2
T.
g -2
o -4
O
-6
-8
-10
0 1 1 10 100
APPLIED PRESSURE,ksf
Specimen Identification Classification Yd, pcf WC,%
• TB-2 4.0ft LEAN CLAY(CL) 104 20
O
Notes Water Added to Sample at 500 psf
0
= SWELL/CONSOLIDATION TEST
Project: Proposed Addition to 4462 Hilltop Road
N 1 Derr acon Site Lot 11, Block 2, Sekich Business Park Town of Mead, Colorado
o Job# 22085021
Date: 3-7-08
U.S SIEVE OPENING IN INCHES I U S SIEVE NUMBERS I HYDROMETER
6 4 3 2 1.5 1 3/4 1/23/8 3 6 810 1416 20 30 40 50 60 100140200
100 I I I 11 f I•
95
•
90
85
80
75
70 -
• 65
x
W 60
>-• 55
to
m
La 50
LL
I- 45
z
w
• 40
w
0-
35
30 -
25
20
15
10
5
0
100 - 10 1 0 1 0 01 0.001
GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS
COBBLES GRAVEL SAND SILT OR CLAY
coarse One coarse medium fine
Specimen Identification Classification LL PL PI Cc Cu
• TB-2 4.0ft LEAN CLAY(CL) 40 19 21
Specimen Identification D100 D60 D30 D10 %Gravel %Sand %Silt %Clay
u • TB-2 4.0ft 4/5 0.0 9.4 90.6
O
O
QU
K •
GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION/SOIL CLASSIFICATION
Project Proposed Addition to 4462 Hilltop Road
1 rerr acon Site Lot 11, Block 2, Sekich Business Park Town of Mead, Colorado
Job# 22085021
o Date. 3-7-08
GENERAL NOTES
DRILLING&SAMPLING SYMBOLS:
SS: Split Spoon- 1-'/8"I.D-,2"O.D., unless otherwise noted HS: Hollow Stem Auger
ST: Thin-Walled Tube-2"0.D.,unless otherwise noted PA: Power Auger
RS: Ring Sampler-2.42"I.D.,3"O.D.,unless otherwise noted HA: Hand Auger
CB: California Barrel- 1.92"I.D.,2.5"0.D.,unless otherwise noted RB: Rock Bit
BS: Bulk Sample or Auger Sample WB: Wash Boring or Mud Rotary
The number of blows required to advance a standard 2-inch O.D.split-spoon sampler(SS)the last 12 inches of the total 18-inch
penetration with a 140-pound hammer falling 30 inches is considered the "Standard Penetration" or "N-value". For 2.5" O.D.
California Barrel samplers (CB) the penetration value is reported as the number of blows required to advance the sampler 12
inches using a 140-pound hammer falling 30 inches, reported as "blows per inch," and is not considered equivalent to the
"Standard Penetration"or"N-value".
WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENT SYMBOLS:
WL: Water Level WS: While Sampling
WCI: Wet Cave in WD: While Drilling
DCI: Dry Cave in BCR: Before Casing Removal
AB: After Boring ACR: After Casing Removal
•
Water levels indicated on the boring logs are the levels measured in the borings at the times indicated. Groundwater levels at other
times and other locations across the site could vary. In pervious soils,the indicated levels may reflect the location of groundwater.
In low permeability soils,the accurate determination of groundwater levels may not be possible with only short-term observations.
DESCRIPTIVE SOIL CLASSIFICATION: Soil classification is based on the Unified Classification System. Coarse Grained Soils
have more than 50%of their dry weight retained on a#200 sieve;their principal descriptors are:boulders,cobbles,gravel or sand.
Fine Grained Soils have less than 50% of their dry weight retained on a#200 sieve; they are principally described as clays if they
are plastic, and silts if they are slightly plastic or non-plastic. Major constituents may be added as modifiers and minor constituents
may be added according to the relative proportions based on grain size. In addition to gradation, coarse-grained soils are defined
on the basis of their in-place relative density and fine-grained soils on the basis of their consistency.
FINE-GRAINED SOILS COARSE-GRAINED SOILS BEDROCK
(CB) (SS) fCB) (SS) Relative (CB) (SS)
Blows/Ft. Blows/Ft. Consistency Blows/Ft. Blows/Ft. Density Blows/Ft. Blows/Ft. Consistency
<3 <2 Very Soft 0-5 <3 Very Loose <24 <20 Weathered
3-4 2-3 Soft 6-14 4-9 Loose 24-35 20-29 Firm
5-7 4-6 Medium Stiff 15-46 10-29 Medium Dense 36-60 30-49 Medium Hard
8-15 7-12 Stiff 47-78 30-49 Dense 61-96 50-79 Hard
16-32 13-26 Very Stiff >78 >49 Very Dense >96 >79 Very Hard
> 32 >26 Hard
RELATIVE PROPORTIONS OF SAND AND GRAIN SIZE TERMINOLOGY
GRAVEL
Descriptive Terms of Percent of Major Component
Other Constituents Dry Weight of Sample Particle Size
Trace < 15 Boulders Over 12 in. (300mm)
With 15—29 Cobbles 12 in.to 3 in. (300mm to 75mm)
Modifier >30 Gravel 3 in.to#4 sieve(75mm to 4.75 mm)
Sand #4 to#200 sieve(4 75mm to 0.075mm)
Silt or Clay Passing#200 Sieve(0 075mm)
RELATIVE PROPORTIONS OF FINES PLASTICITY DESCRIPTION
Descriptive Terms of Percent of
Other Constituents , Dry Weight Term Plasticity Index
Trace <5 Non-plastic 0
With 5-12 Low 1-10
Modifiers > 12 Medium 11-30
High 30+
•
lierracon
UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM
Criteria for Assigning Group Symbols and Group Names Using Laboratory Tests" Soil Classification
Group
Symbol Group Name°
Coarse Grained Soils Gravels Clean Gravels Cu>4 and 1≤Cc s 3° GW Well graded gravel`
More than 50%retained More than 50%of coarse Less than 5%fines`
fraction retained on Cu<4 and/or 1>Cc>3° GP Poorly graded gravel`
on No.200 sieve No.4 sieve Gravels with Fines Fines classify as ML or MH GM Silty gravel""
More than 12%fines` Fines classify as CL or CH GC Clayey gravel""
Sands Clean Sands Cu>6 and 1 s Cc≤3` SW Well graded sand'
50%or more of coarse Less than 5%fines°
fraction passes Cu<6 and/or 1>Cc>3° SP Poorly graded sand'
No.4 sieve Sands with Fines Fines classify as ML or MH SM Silty sand°H1
More than 12%fines° Fines classify as CL or CH SC Clayey sand"'
•
Fine-Grained Soils Silts and Clays Inorganic PI>7 and plots on or above"A"line' CL Lean clay"`"
50%or more passes the Liquid limit less than 50
No.200 sieve PI<4 or plots below"A"line' ML Silt"
Organic Liquid limit-oven Organic clay""
dried <0.75 OL
Liquid limit-not Organic silt"LM' •
dried
Slits and Clays Inorganic PI plots on or above"A"line CH Fat clad"
Liquid limit 50 or more
PI plots below"A"line MH Elastic silt"
Organic Liquid limit-oven dried Organic cla}""°
<075 OH
Liquid limit-not dried Organic silt"1A1° •
Highly organic soils Primarily organic matter,dark in color,and organic odor PT Peat
BBased on the material passing the 3-in. (75-mm)sieve Hlf fines are organic, add"with organic fines"to group name.
If field sample contained cobbles or boulders,or both,add"with cobbles ' If soil contains≥15%gravel,add"with gravel"to group name.
cor boulders, or both"to group name. 'If Atterberg limits plot in shaded area,soil is a CL-ML,silty clay.
Gravels with 5 to 12%fines require dual symbols: GW-GM well graded "If soil contains 15 to 29%plus No.200,add"with sand"or"with
gravel with silt,GW-GC well graded gravel with clay, GP-GM poorly gravel,'whichever is predominant_
graded gravel with silt,GP-GC poorly graded gravel with clay. L
°Sands with 5 to 12%fines require dual symbols: SW-SM well graded if soil contains≥30%plus No.200 predominantly sand,add
sand with silt,SW-SC well raded sand with cla SP-SM "sandy"to group name.
9 y, poorly graded
"' If soil contains≥30%plus No.200,predominantly gravel,
sand with sill,SP-SC poorly graded sand with clay
s add"gravelly"to group name.
ECu=Dsa/Dr0 Cc= (D'°? "PI>.4 and plots on or above"A"line
Do x D°o ° PI<4 or plots below"A"line.
F If soil contains≥ 15%sand,add"with sand"to group name. PPI plots on or above"A"line
°If fines classify as CL-ML,use dual symbol GC-GM,or SC-SM ° PI plots below"A"line
60 l i
For classification of fine-grained
soils and fine-grained fraction
so —of coarse-grained soils _ _— \ce.,.! _ "
Vc
Equation of"A"-line ,J,( P
a Horizontal at PI=O to LL=25 5 •
>< 40— then PI=0 73 ILL-20) I !O'` ,
zEquation of"U"-line ••�t
Vertical at LL=16 to PI=7, v
30 — then P1=0 9(LL-8)
U ' I OA
C 20 i'" Ova —_ i
o_ " I MH or OH s,'"
lo of
4� d' _ .A�1 MLorOL ''-I
0 10 16 20 30 40 50 60 70 60 _ 90_ _100 110
LIQUID LIMIT(LL) 1 ierracon _
ROCK CLASSIFICATION
(Based on ASTM C-294)
Sedimentary Rocks
Sedimentary rocks are stratified materials laid down by water or wind. The sediments may be
composed of particles of pre-existing rocks derived by mechanical weathering, evaporation or by
chemical or organic origin. The sediments are usually indurated by cementation or compaction.
Chert Very fine-grained siliceous rock composed of micro-crystalline or crypto-
crystalline quartz, chalcedony or opal. Chert is various colored, porous to
dense, hard and has a conchoidal to splintery fracture.
Claystone Fine-grained rock composed of or derived by erosion of silts and clays or any
rock containing clay. Soft massive; gray, black, brown, reddish or green and
may contain carbonate minerals.
Conglomerate Rock consisting of a considerable amount of rounded gravel, sand and cobbles
with or without interstitial or cementing material. The cementing or interstitial
material may be quartz, opal, calcite, dolomite, clay, iron oxides or other
materials.
Dolomite A fine-grained carbonate rock consisting of the mineral dolomite (CaMg
(CO312]. May contain noncarbonate impurities such as quartz, chert, clay
minerals, organic matter, gypsum and sulfides. Reacts with hydrochloric acid
(HCL).
Limestone A fine-grained carbonate rock consisting of the mineral calcite (CaCo3). May
contain noncarbonate impurities such as quartz, chert, clay minerals, organic
matter, gypsum and sulfides. Reacts with hydrochloric acid (HCL).
Sandstone Rock consisting of particles of sand with or without interstitial and cementing
materials. The cementing or interstitial material may be quartz, opal, calcite,
dolomite, clay, iron oxides or other material.
Shale Fine-grained rock composed of, or derived by erosion of silts and clays or any
rock containing clay. Shale is hard, platy, or fissile may be gray, black,
reddish or green and may contain some carbonate minerals (calcareous shale).
Siltstone Fine grained rock composed of, or derived by erosion of silts or rock
containing silt. Siltstones consist predominantly of silt sized particles (0.0625
to 0.002 mm in diameter) and are intermediate rocks between claystones and
sandstones, may be gray, black, brown, reddish or green and may contain
carbonate minerals.
lierracon
Utility Report
The existing property is currently service by public utilities which are adequate for the
proposed use.
Water Rights Report
The area to be annexed is a part of an established industrial subdivision and is currently
served by a public water system. No additional water rights are necessary or attached to this
parcel.
Statement of Community Need
Annexation of this parcel will continue the process of unifying the public infrastructure
maintenance responsibilities within the existing subdivision boundaries of the Sekich
Business Park. Current public infrastructure maintenance is provided by Weld County and
the Town of Mead.
Statement of School Impact
No impacts to the school system are anticipated as a result of this annexation. The parcel is
currently zoned industrial and that use will continue with the proposed annexation.
Assessment of Impacts
6.01 Water—no impact is anticipated. A public water system tap provides water service to
the existing property. The service tap is located along the northern boundary of the property.
The Little Thompson Water District is the public water system provider.
6.02 Sewer— no impact is anticipated. Service to the parcel is currently provided by the
Town of Mead. Although mainline sewer service is available at the northwest corner of the
lot the elevation of the mains are not suitable for gravity sewer service. As a part of this
project a new sewer main will be constructed through the adjacent lots (via new dedicated
easements) to provide gravity sewer service to the proposed development.
6.03 Natural Gas—no impact is anticipated. Existing gas service is available along the east
boundary of the parcel. Natural Gas is provided by
6.04 Electrical —no impact is anticipated. Existing electrical service is available along the
east boundary of the parcel. Electrical service is provided by
6.05 Telephone—no impact is anticipated. Existing telephone service is available along the
east boundary of the parcel. Telephone service is provided by
6.06 Streets - With the proposed annexation no new streets will be constructed. The parcel
has street access along both the north and eastern boundaries of the parcel. At the request of
the Town of Mead, annexation of a portion of Weld County Road (WCR) 9.5 is included in
this annexation request which will result in additional maintenance responsibilities for this
road.
6.07 Drainage—With the proposed annexation historical drainage patterns will not be
significantly altered outside of the property boundaries. As a part of the improvements,
drainage structures will be designed and constructed to unsure maintenance of historical
drainage patterns and flow rates.
6.08 Law enforcement - no impact is anticipated. Law enforcement is currently provided by
Weld County. MEAD Law Enforcement Ti?
6.09 Fire protection - no impact is anticipated. The current pubic water system is suitable for
the proposed development and within the fire district
6.10 Parks and Recreation—no impact. The current and proposed land use will remain as
industrial and will not have an impact on Parks and Recreation facilities or uses.
6.11 Environmental Considerations—no impact. The potential impacts resulting from this
impact will not change. The proposed land use will remain as industrial zoning consistent
with the adjacent land uses.
6.12 Economic Development Potential. Annexation of this parcel into the Town of Mead
may result in additional tax revenue generation by the industrial end user.
Development Compatability
7.1 Streets Master Plan — no changes are proposed. The existing streets infrastructure is in
place.
7.2 Subdivision Plan - With the proposed annexation and proposed replat only lot line
adjustments are anticipated.
7.3 Comprehensive Plan— no changes in existing land use are proposed with this annexation.
7.4 Land Use Code—No variances from the land use code are requested as a part of this
annexation.
7.5 Existing and adjacent land use—No change in land use is requested as a part of this
annexation. The existing land use is Industrial and that use is consistent with the adjacent
land uses.
Assessment of Impacts
6.01 Water— no impact is anticipated. A public water system tap provides water service to
the existing property. The service tap is located along the northern boundary of the property.
The Little Thompson Water District is the public water system provider.
6.02 Sewer—no impact is anticipated. Service to the parcel is currently provided by the
Town of Mead. Although mainline sewer service is available at the northwest corner of the
lot the elevation of the mains are not suitable for gravity sewer service. As a part of this
project a new sewer main will be constructed through the adjacent lots (via new dedicated
easements) to provide gravity sewer service to the proposed development.
6.03 Natural Gas—no impact is anticipated. Existing gas service is available along the east
boundary of the parcel. Natural Gas is provided by Excel Energy
6.04 Electrical—no impact is anticipated. Existing electrical service is available along the
east boundary of the parcel. Electrical service is provided by Excel Energy
6.05 Telephone—no impact is anticipated. Existing telephone service is available along the
east boundary of the parcel. Telephone service is provided by Quest
6.06 Streets - With the proposed annexation no new streets will be constructed. The parcel
has street access along both the north and eastern boundaries of the parcel. At the request of
the Town of Mead, annexation of a portion of Weld County Road (WCR) 9.5 is included in
this annexation request which will result in additional maintenance responsibilities for this
road.
6.07 Drainage—With the proposed annexation historical drainage patterns will not be
significantly altered outside of the property boundaries. As a part of the improvements,
drainage structures will be designed and constructed to unsure maintenance of historical
drainage patterns and flow rates.
6.08 Law enforcement - no impact is anticipated. Law enforcement is currently provided by
Weld County. Mead Law Enforcement is provided under contract with Weld County
6.09 Fire protection - no impact is anticipated. The current pubic water system is suitable for
the proposed development and within the local fire district
6.10 Parks and Recreation—no impact. The current and proposed land use will remain as
industrial and will not have an impact on Parks and Recreation facilities or uses.
6.11 Environmental Considerations—no impact. The potential impacts resulting from this
impact will not change. The proposed land use will remain as industrial zoning consistent
with the adjacent land uses.
6.12 Economic Development Potential. Annexation of this parcel into the Town of Mead
may result in additional tax revenue generation by the industrial end user.
Town Policy
The existing and propose use of this parcel are consistent with the Town of Mead Streets and
Subdivision plans as well as the Comprehensive Plan, Land Use Code and the adjacent land
uses.
Town of Mead
P.O.Box 626
441 Third Street
Mead"A Little Town Mead,Colorado 80542-0626
With a Big Future" (970)535-4477
•
CERTIFIED MAIL#7007 1490 0004 3519 1401
August 13,2008
Weld County Board of Commissioners
P.O. Box 758
Greeley, CO 80632
RE: Notice of Public Hearing- Sekich Business Park No. 6
Board of Trustees - 7:00 P.M., Monday, September 8, 2008.
Gentlemen:
Please be advised that a public hearing before the Mead Board of Trustees has been set to review
and consider the annexation of the good portion of the southwest quarter of Section 23, Township 3
North, range 68 West of the 6th P.M.. The property is owned by the NSN Group LLC and SNH LLC,
4325 Hilltop Rd, Longmont, CO 80504-9682 and is proposed to be used for industrial purposes.
In accordance with C.R.S. § 31-12-108 (2), this notice has been sent to the Board of County
Commissioners and County Attorney for Weld County, and to each special district or school district
having territory within the area to be annexed.
Attached is a copy of the published public hearing notice, together with a copy of the adopted
resolution of intent to annex and the applicant's petition for annexation. You have previously received
copies of the"Letter of Intent"provided with the application, and maps of the property location and a
"concept plan" for the development of the property. Copies of the full application, as well as the full-
sized maps submitted with the application are available for review in the Mead Town Hall, 441 - 3�
Street, Mead, Colorado. Written comments may be sent to Dan Dean, Town Manager, Box 626, Mead,
CO 80542.
Very truly yours,
Candace Bridgwater
Town Clerk
Co 8 Sp Dist BOT Notice-SBP 6.wpd 8/13/08 3:12 pm
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
MEAD BOARD OF TRUSTEES
SEKICH BUSINESS PARK ANNEXATION NO. 6
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Board of Trustees of the Town of Mead has
adopted a Resolution of Substantial Compliance initiating annexation proceedings for the
"Sekich Business Park Annexation No. 6," said Annexation being more particularly
described in the following Resolution No. 23-R-2008.
The Board of Trustees of the Town of Mead will hold a Public Hearing
commencing at 7:00 p.m., Monday, September 8, 2008, at the Mead Town Hall, 441 - 3r°
Street, Mead, Colorado 80542, for the purpose of determining whether the property
proposed to be annexed meet the applicable requirements of the statutes of the State of
Colorado and is eligible for annexation to the Town of Mead, and to establish the
appropriate land use for the property, if requested.
Any person may appear at the Public Hearing and be heard regarding the matters
under consideration.
Copies of the petition and supporting material submitted to the Town are on file
and available for public inspection in the Office of the Town Clerk, at the Mead Town Hall,
441 - 3rd Street, Mead, Colorado 80542.
Dated this 29th day of July 2008.
TOWN OF MEAD, COLORADO
By: /s/Candace Bridgwater
Town Clerk
s
TOWN OF MEAD, COLORADO
RESOLUTION NO. 23-R-2008
A RESOLUTION FINDING SUBSTANTIAL COMPLIANCE AND
INITIATING ANNEXATION PROCEEDINGS FOR CERTAIN
PROPERTIES IN WELD COUNTY, COLORADO TO THE TOWN OF
MEAD, SAID ANNEXATION TO BE KNOWN AS THE SEKICH
BUSINESS PARK ANNEXATIONS NO. 6.
WHEREAS, a written petition together with four (4) prints of an annexation map for
annexation of certain properties have been filed with the Board of Trustees of the Town of Mead
by NSN Group LLC and SNH LLC, 4325 Hilltop Rd, Longmont, CO 80504-9682; and
WHEREAS, the Board of Trustees has reviewed the petitions and supporting material; and
WHEREAS, the Board of Trustees wishes to permit simultaneous consideration of the
subject property for annexation and zoning, if requested in the petition; and
WHEREAS, it is the desire of the Board of Trustees to also consider the annexation of the
adjacent portion of Weld County Road 9 `/Z, connecting State Highway 66 and Weld County Road
32; and
WHEREAS, the Board of Trustees has reviewed the petition and desires to adopt by
Resolution its findings in regard to the petition;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF
THE TOWN OF MEAD, COLORADO, as follows:
Section 1. The petition, whose legal description is attached hereto as Exhibit A and
incorporated by reference herein, is accepted and determined to be in substantial compliance with
the applicable laws of the State of Colorado.
Section 2. No election is required under C.R.S. §31-12-107(2).
Section 3. No additional terms and conditions are to be imposed except those provided
for in the petitions.
Section 4. The Board of Trustees will hold a public hearing for the purpose of
determining if the proposed annexation complies with C.R.S. §31-12-104, and with C.R.S. §31-12-
105, and will hold a public hearing to determine the appropriate zoning of the subject properties if
requested in the petition, at the Mead Town Hall, 441 - 3rd Street, Mead, Colorado 80542, at the
following time and date:
7:00 p.m., Monday, September 8, 2008.
Section 5. Any person may appear at such hearing and present evidence relative to the
proposed annexation or the proposed zoning.
Section 6. Upon completion of the hearing, the Board of Trustees shall set forth, by
resolution, its findings and conclusions with reference to the eligibility of the proposed annexation,
and whether the statutory requirements for the proposed annexation have been met, and further,
will determine the appropriate zoning of the subject property if requested in the petition.
Section 7. If the Board of Trustees concludes, by resolution, that all statutory
requirements have been met and that the proposed annexation is proper under the laws of the State
of Colorado, the Board of Trustees shall pass one or more ordinances annexing the subject property
to the Town of Mead, and shall pass one or more ordinances zoning the subject property if
requested in the petition.
INTRODUCED, READ, PASSED, AND ADOPTED THIS 28th DAY OF July , 2008.
ATTEST: TOWN OF MEAD
By /s/ Candace Bridgwater By /s/Richard W. Macomber
Candace Bridgwater, Town Clerk Richard W. Macomber, Mayor
EXHIBIT A
SEKICH BUSINESS PARK ANNEXATIONS NO. 6
Legal Description:
A PARCEL LOCATED IN THE SOUTH HALF OF SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH,
RANGE 68 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M., COUNTY OF WELD, STATE OF COLORADO, BEING
MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
LOT 10, BLOCK 2, SEKICH BUSINESS PARK, AS RECORDED AT RECEPTION NO.
02210262 IN BOOK 1260, ON APRIL 09, 1990, OF THE RECORDS OF THE WELD COUNTY
CLERK AND RECORDER;
TOGETHER WITH A PORTION OF WELD COUNTY ROAD 9.5;
SAID COMBINED PARCEL OF LOT 10 AND A PORTION OF WELD COUNTY ROAD 9.5
BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 10, BLOCK 2 SEKICH
BUSINESS PARK, AND CONSIDERING THE EAST LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST
QUARTER OF SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 68 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M. TO
BEAR NORTH 01°05'34" WEST WITH ALL BEARINGS CONTAINED HEREIN RELATIVE
THERETO;
THENCE NORTH 01°05'34" WEST, 30.00 FEET WESTERLY OF AND PARALLEL TO SAID
EAST LINE, ALSO BEING THE EASTERLY LINE OF LOT 5, BLOCK 1, SEKICH BUSINESS
PARK AS RECORDED AT RECEPTION NO. 02300610 IN BOOK 1348, ON AUGUST 19,
1992 OF SAID RECORDS OF WELD COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER; ALSO BEING
THE EASTERLY LINE OF BLOCK 1, FINAL PLAT OF SEKICH BUSINESS PARK AS
RECORDED AT RECEPTION NO. 01923940 IN BOOK 993, ON APRIL 19, 1983, OF SAID
RECORDS OF WELD COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER; A DISTANCE OF 696.54 FEET
TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID BLOCK 1;
THENCE NORTH 89°27'14" EAST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SOUTHWEST
QUARTER, A DISTANCE OF 30.00 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID
SOUTHWEST QUARTER;
THENCE NORTH 89°26'37" EAST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST
QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 23, A DISTANCE OF 90.88 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST
CORNER OF THAT PARCEL DESCRIBED AT RECEPTION NO. 02838515, RECORDED ON
APRIL 06, 2001 OF SAID RECORDS OF THE WELD COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER;
THENCE SOUTH 00°58'21"EAST ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID PARCEL DESCRIBED
AT RECEPTION NO. 02838515, A DISTANCE OF 2609.11 FEET TO A POINT BEING 40.00
FEET NORTHERLY OF THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER, ALSO
BEING THE NORTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF STATE HIGHWAY 66;
THENCE SOUTH 89°39'16" WEST, 40.00 FEET NORTHERLY OF AND PARALLEL WITH
SAID SOUTH LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER, A DISTANCE OF 85.41 FEET TO
THE EAST LINE OF SAID SOUTHWEST QUARTER;
THENCE SOUTH 89°06'08" WEST, 40.00 FEET NORTHERLY OF AND PARALLEL TO THE
SOUTH LINE OF SAID SOUTHWEST QUARTER, A DISTANCE OF 30.00 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 01°05'34" WEST, 30.00 FEET WESTERLY OF AND PARALLEL TO SAID
EAST LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER, ALSO BEING THE EASTERLY LINES OF
THE FOLLOWING THREE (3) PARCELS:
1) LOT 4, BLOCK 4 OF "REPLAT 'A' OF SEKICH BUSINESS PARK, RECEPTION NO.
01952675;
2) LOT 5, BLOCK 4 OF "SEKICH BUSINESS PARK", RECEPTION NO. 01923948;
3) LOT 9, BLOCK 2 OF "SEKICH BUSINESS PARK",
A DISTANCE OF 1302.71 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 10;
THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHERLY, WESTERLY AND NORTHERLY BOUNDARY OF
SAID LOT 10 THE FOLLOWING SIX (6) COURSES:
1) SOUTH 89°23'00"WEST, A DISTANCE OF 233.03 FEET;
2) NORTH 01°05'34" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 488.31 FEET;
3) NORTH 26°02'45" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 63.14 FEET;
4) NORTH 34°53'40" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 29.59 FEET;
5) NORTH 46°47'25"WEST, A DISTANCE OF 57.86 FEET:
6) NORTH 89°23'54" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 317.54 FEET TO THE POINT OF
BEGINNING,
CONTAINING A CALCULATED AREA OF 454,487 SQUARE FEET, OR 10.343 ACRES,
MORE OF LESS.
SEKICH BUSINESS PARK ANNEXATION NO. 6
PETITION FOR ANNEXATION
TO: THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF MEAD, COLORADO:
We, the NSN Group LLC and SNH LLC, 4325 Hilltop Rd, Longmont, CO 80504-9682,
the undersigned landowners, in accordance with Colorado law, hereby petition the Town of
Mead and its Board of Trustees for annexation to the Town of Mead of the following described
unincorporated territory located in the County of Weld and State of Colorado, to-wit:
A portion of the Southwest one quarter and the Southeast one quarter of Section
23, Township 3 North, Range 68 West of the 6th Principal Meridian, more
particularly described in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein by
this reference.
As part of this petition, your petitioner further states to the Board of Trustees of Mead,
Colorado, that:
1. It is desirable and necessary that the territory described Exhibit A be annexed to the
Town of Mead.
2. The requirements of C.R.S. sections 31-12-104 and 31-12-105, as amended, exist or
have been met in that:
a. Not less than one-sixth of the perimeter of the area proposed to be annexed
is contiguous with the Town of Mead or will be contiguous with the Town of Mead within
such time as required by 31-12-104.
b. A community of interest exists between the area proposed to be annexed and
the Town of Mead.
c. The area proposed to be annexed is urban or will be urbanized in the near
future.
d. The area proposed to be annexed is integrated with or is capable of being
integrated with the Town of Mead.
e. No land within the boundary of the territory proposed to be annexed which is
held in identical ownership, whether consisting of one tract or parcel of real estate or two
or more contiguous tracts or parcels of real estate, has been divided into separate parts
or parcels without the written consent of the landowner or landowners thereof, unless
such tracts or parcels were separated by a dedicated street, road or other public way.
f. No land within the boundary of the area proposed to be annexed which is held
in identical ownership, comprises twenty acres or more, and which, together with the
buildings and improvements situated thereon has an assessed value in excess of two
hundred thousand dollars ($200,000.00) for ad valorem tax purposes for the year next
preceding the annexation, has been included within the area proposed to be annexed
without the written consent of the landowner or landowners.
g. No annexation proceedings have been commenced for any portion of the
territory proposed to be annexed for the annexation of such territory to another
municipality.
h. The annexation of the territory proposed to be annexed will not result in the
detachment of area from any school district.
I. The annexation of the territory proposed to be annexed will not have the effect
of extending the boundary of the Town of Mead more than three miles in any direction
from any point of the boundary of the Town of Mead in any one year.
j. Prior to completion of the annexation of the territory proposed to be annexed,
the Town of Mead will have in place a plan for that area, which generally describes the
proposed: Location, character, and extent of streets, subways, bridges, waterways,
waterfronts, parkways, playgrounds, squares, parks, aviation fields, other public ways,
grounds, open spaces, public utilities, and terminals for water, light, sanitation,
transportation, and power to be provided by the Town of Mead; and the proposed land
uses for the area; such plan to be updated at least once annually.
k. In establishing the boundary of the territory proposed to be annexed, if a
portion of a platted street or alley is to be annexed, the entire width of the street or alley
has been included within the territory to be annexed. The Town of Mead will not deny
reasonable access to any landowners, owners of any easement, or the owners of any
franchise adjoining any platted street or alley which is to be annexed to the Town of
Mead but is not bounded on both sides by the Town of Mead.
3. The owners of more than fifty percent of the area proposed to be annexed, exclusive
of dedicated streets and alleys, have signed this petition and hereby petition for annexation of
such territory.
4. Accompanying this petition are four copies of an annexation map containing the
information following:
a. A written legal description of the boundaries of the area proposed to be
annexed;
b. A map showing the boundary or the area proposed to be annexed, said map
prepared and containing the seal of a registered engineer;
c. Within the annexation boundary map, a showing of the location of each
ownership tract in unplatted land and, if part or all of the area is platted, the boundaries
and the plat numbers of plots or of lots and blocks;
d. Next to the boundary of the area proposed to be annexed, a drawing of the
contiguous boundary of the Town of Mead and the contiguous boundary of any other
municipality abutting the area proposed to be annexed, and a showing of the
dimensions of such contiguous boundaries.
5. Upon the Annexation Ordinance becoming effective, all lands within the area
proposed to be annexed will become subject to all ordinances, rules and regulations of the
Town of Mead, except for general property taxes of the Town of Mead which shall become
effective as the January 1 next ensuing.
6. The zoning classification (land use) requested for the area proposed to be annexed
is industrial uses in Performance District 1.
WHEREFORE, the following petitioner respectfully requests that the Town of Mead,
acting through its Board of Trustees, approve the annexation of the area proposed to be
annexed. By this acknowledgment, the undersigned hereby certify that the above information is
complete and true.
Owner: /s/ Wayne Schell Date: 7/14/08
Wayne Schell, Manager, NSN Group, LLC
Owner: /s/Wayne Schell Date: 7/14/08
Wayne Schell, Manager, SNH, LLC
STATE OF COLORADO
SS.
COUNTY OF Weld
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 14th day of _
July , 200 8 by Wayne Schell
My commission expires:
Witness My hand and official seal.
/s/ Sheila L. Goodman
Notary Public
Landowner/Petitioner Date Signed Legal Description
Mailing Address of Land Owned
NSN Group LLC and SNH LLC, Lot 10, Block 2, Sekich Business Park
4325 Hilltop Rd, Longmont, CO
80504-9682
AFFIDAVIT OF CIRCULATOR
STATE OF COLORADO )
) ss.
COUNTY OF )
, being first duly sworn upon oath, deposes and says
that(he or she)was the circulator of this Petition for Annexation of lands to the Town of Mead, Colorado,
consisting of[ ] pages including this page and that each signature hereon was witnessed by your affiant
and is the signature of the person whose name it purports to be.
Circulator
STATE OF COLORADO )
SS.
COUNTY OF )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of
, 200_by
My commission expires:
Witness My hand and official seal.
Notary Public
EXHIBIT A
SECKICH BUSINESS PARK ANNEXATION NO. 6
Legal description:
A PARCEL LOCATED IN THE SOUTH HALF OF SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 68
WEST OF THE 6T" P.M., COUNTY OF WELD, STATE OF COLORADO, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY
DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
LOT 10, BLOCK 2, SEKICH BUSINESS PARK, AS RECORDED AT RECEPTION NO. 02210262 IN
BOOK 1260, ON APRIL 09, 1990, OF THE RECORDS OF THE WELD COUNTY CLERK AND
RECORDER;
TOGETHER WITH A PORTION OF WELD COUNTY ROAD 9.5;
SAID COMBINED PARCEL OF LOT 10 AND A PORTION OF WELD COUNTY ROAD 9.5 BEING MORE
PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 10, BLOCK 2 SEKICH BUSINESS PARK,
AND CONSIDERING THE EAST LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP
3 NORTH, RANGE 68 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M. TO BEAR NORTH 01°05'34" WEST WITH ALL
BEARINGS CONTAINED HEREIN RELATIVE THERETO;
THENCE NORTH 01°05'34"WEST, 30.00 FEET WESTERLY OF AND PARALLEL TO SAID EAST LINE,
ALSO BEING THE EASTERLY LINE OF LOT 5, BLOCK 1, SEKICH BUSINESS PARK AS RECORDED
AT RECEPTION NO. 02300610 IN BOOK 1348, ON AUGUST 19, 1992 OF SAID RECORDS OF WELD
COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER; ALSO BEING THE EASTERLY LINE OF BLOCK 1, FINAL PLAT
OF SEKICH BUSINESS PARK AS RECORDED AT RECEPTION NO. 01923940 IN BOOK 993, ON
APRIL 19, 1983, OF SAID RECORDS OF WELD COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER; A DISTANCE OF
696.54 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID BLOCK 1;
THENCE NORTH 89°27'14" EAST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SOUTHWEST QUARTER, A
DISTANCE OF 30.00 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SOUTHWEST QUARTER;
THENCE NORTH 89°26'37" EAST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF
SAID SECTION 23, A DISTANCE OF 90.88 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THAT PARCEL
DESCRIBED AT RECEPTION NO. 02838515, RECORDED ON APRIL 06, 2001 OF SAID RECORDS OF
THE WELD COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER;
THENCE SOUTH 00°58'21"EAST ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID PARCEL DESCRIBED AT
RECEPTION NO. 02838515, A DISTANCE OF 2609.11 FEET TO A POINT BEING 40.00 FEET
NORTHERLY OF THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER, ALSO BEING THE
NORTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF STATE HIGHWAY 66;
THENCE SOUTH 89°39'16"WEST, 40.00 FEET NORTHERLY OF AND PARALLEL WITH SAID SOUTH
LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER, A DISTANCE OF 85.41 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF SAID
SOUTHWEST QUARTER;
THENCE SOUTH 89°06'08"WEST, 40.00 FEET NORTHERLY OF AND PARALLEL TO THE SOUTH
LINE OF SAID SOUTHWEST QUARTER, A DISTANCE OF 30.00 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 01°05'34" WEST, 30.00 FEET WESTERLY OF AND PARALLEL TO SAID EAST LINE
OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER, ALSO BEING THE EASTERLY LINES OF THE FOLLOWING
THREE (3) PARCELS:
1) LOT 4, BLOCK 4 OF "REPLAT 'A' OF SEKICH BUSINESS PARK, RECEPTION NO. 01952675;
2) LOT 5, BLOCK 4 OF "SEKICH BUSINESS PARK", RECEPTION NO. 01923948;
3) LOT 9, BLOCK 2 OF "SEKICH BUSINESS PARK",
A DISTANCE OF 1302.71 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 10;
THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHERLY, WESTERLY AND NORTHERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID LOT 10
THE FOLLOWING SIX (6) COURSES:
1) SOUTH 89°23'00"WEST, A DISTANCE OF 233.03 FEET;
2) NORTH 01°05'34" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 488.31 FEET;
3) NORTH 26°02'45" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 63.14 FEET;
4) NORTH 34°53'40" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 29.59 FEET;
5) NORTH 46°47'25" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 57.86 FEET:
6) NORTH 89°23'54" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 317.54 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING,
CONTAINING A CALCULATED AREA OF 454,487 SQUARE FEET, OR 10.343 ACRES, MORE OF
LESS.
Town of Mead
P.O.Box 626
441 Third Street
Mcad"A Little Town Mead,Colorado 80542-0626
w,m a Big Future" (970)535-4477
CERTIFIED MAIL#7007 1490 0004 3519 1517
August 13, 2008
Weld County Board of Commissioners
P.O. Box 758
Greeley, CO 80632
RE: Required Annexation Impact Report - Sekich Business Park Annexation No. 6 to
the Town of Mead.
Gentlemen:
In accordance with the requirements of C.R.S. § 31-12-108.5, enclosed is a copy of the
Annexation Impact Report prepared for the proposed Sekich Business Park Annexation No. 6 to
the Town of Mead. You have received prior notice of the public hearings before the Planning
Commission and the Board of Trustees for this proposal. In the event that you have any questions
regarding this Annexation Impact Report, or the proposed annexation, you may contact Richard
E. Samson, the Town's Attorney, at(303) 776-1169.
Very truly yours, _
Candace Bridgwater
Town Clerk
Co Impact Notice Cover.wpd 8/13/08 9:43 am
Annexation Impact Report
Sekich Business Park Annexation No. 6
August 13, 2008
Prepared for:
Town of Mead
P.O. Box 626
Mead, CO 80542
Table of Contents
Page
Project Description 1
II. Municipal Services 1
III. Special Districts 1
IV. School District Impact 1
V. Exhibits 2
A. Existing Conditions Map and Proposed Land Use Map
Forward:
This "annexation impact report" has been prepared pursuant to Section 31-12-108.5 Colorado Revised
Statutes, 1986 Repl. Vol. Contained in Appendix "A" is a map depicting the proposed annexation, the
existing and proposed public services to the property and the existing and proposed land use for the
property.
I. Project Description:
The property proposed for annexation consists 10.343 acres and is located at the southwest corner of
Mulligan Drive and WCR 9 % in the Sekich Business Park. Included in the territory to be annexed is the
full right-of-way for WCR 9 '/from State Highway 66 northward one half mile. The annexation is
contiguous to the Town along Mulligan Drive, WCR 9% and State Highway 66. The proposed annexation
satisfies the 1/6 contiguity with the Town boundaries required by statute.
The land proposed to be annexed is owned by NSN Group LLC and SNH LLC, 4325 Hilltop Rd,
Longmont, CO 80504-9682. Annexation will enable the property to be served by sanitary sewer services.
The land is currently zoned for industrial uses by Weld County. In conjunction with the proposed
annexation, the zoning will be industrial, in conformance with the Town's Land Use Code. Adjacent land
uses include agriculture, and industrial uses on 2-4 acre lots in both the Town and county.
II. Municipal Services:
Municipal services for the Sekich Business Park Annexation No. 6 Annexation will be provided in the
following manner:
Electricity Electric services are to be provided by the present supplier, United Power Inc.,
the electric franchisee for the Town of Mead.
Telephone U.S. West Communications
Water Little Thompson Water District
Sanitary Sewer Sewer service will be provided by connection to the Town's sanitary sewer
collection system.
Fire The site is currently served by the Mountain View Fire Protection District.
Police Weld County Sheriff, under contract with the Town of Mead.
Street Maint. Maintenance of roadways within the annexation will be provided by the Town after
construction to Town specifications and acceptance by the Board of Trustees.
Financing the municipal services within the area to be annexed is addressed in an annexation agreement
between the applicant and the Town of Mead. The annexation agreement is currently under negotiation
and is not available at this time.
III. Special Districts:
The area to be annexed is included within the following special districts:
St. Vrain Valley School District
Mountain View Fire Protection District
Northern Colorado Water Conservancy District
St. Vrain - Left Hand Water Conservancy District
Weld County Library District
IV. School District Impact:
It is anticipated that the annexation will bring a benefit to the St. Vrain School District RE1J due to the
increase in valuation, and will contribute no K-12 students to the school system.
V. Exhibits:
A. Existing Conditions Map and Proposed Land Use Map
C
NEl e8 e !11
1,1.___.._....__ . !iii;
ri
• "'
�p 4 III • ,
a
�I: , I � � !ill
®e
�, G. i u. ,1, 1 <,--
,.. l i • i I 6 IEI
E p
�.i . I Ili
's m ii�,! I !P!I!
as . Ta 1 ail ill = 1 . t
--'- Q,-`-•� . ,I` �/u
rcki !11I a, I I
w vm•w �� v II g i aig1 .1 G- I
E , ' I a�% e I 1
i I I 0 0.7 ,... .... ... .. . . ... ..... . . ... .. . ......', II 6'i aB Elsa I1 �I
Iii c ��Ili
zo
zN III
O g. pp
w e4 ilW _ J n--- k i RI
Z on 1 s 8Q Iull III.ova_.�.w.uwu�vu 1 'il •'• 0 tl I
V6 I.
Q .-WfIX tlF°1 g61. ill I' �I I Ia
F§a I IV I ,
I;
o� - �;, yes = :Ii
€' .F ' Glii 4°� It I V E I I
w ra r I 'a I
Ic
.1 - , u• e
D bo i §�. .. tine ldGS i ., t ? Rill
/y� Fu vV� bl ._. V1Er
2 t2
CJ -
m`K 1 I , ; .. 1 v .. F •
w ill
( I I;! I �I �1 ! II I 0 OiliI
til € I ,t 14 I .I � II , I I, di ( I Ili
ibb ,
'll 1I' ' III Or; I II �I I I ; ; I 1 1 1. _,E•I �i I t
i 4
':61i II I 'IIflI �p ;� :! I:` �k I I 4 a1F�E Q :; se
1 , 16 .R . ' 'E I I I = I n11 l
tip 1.11! -oil i 1! gI 5 I rl II I I Ilfff@ I I - ,.t' 161 I I
i., .iii I ;li II PI fl I; I 0 i Dim I ,I I,1 1 IiI.E iI E .• '
Oils I OA I I'I I En 1 f i • ..w I I S Fiy I4 ! I$II II
� aI111 ! I'I6 q. Ex I ! . � a i
lir t' ,151I:I P Pig ill 1l if 5.II 1 IIIIIl i i r5 i I I `w1; ;Ii
i11I ri
Al Ii tAli t1',di iI'!•II IIIiI111111 !c' IfI !E,I f II din ill
pi hy,l nii,1. IInII I! II !Iin.I HIM. I!, Ii I 3 1 I sI: IP, O1 it
AU L!! LA II i I ei 1 I F. II It,
II!.hiq
Hello