The URL can be used to link to this page

Browse Search

Home My WebLink About20082140.tiff Town of Mead P.O.Box 626 441 Third Street Mead^A Little Town Mead,Colorado 80542-0626 With al+a Future" (970)535-4477 CERTIFIED MAIL#7007 1490 0004 3518 9323 July 29, 2008 Weld County Board of Commissioners P.O. Box 758 Greeley, CO 80632 RE: Request for Comments and Recommendations on the Annexation of the Equinox Annexation. Gentlemen: Enclosed is a copy of the application, annexation maps and other supporting material for the proposed annexation of the Equinox Annexation to the Town of Mead. This property is located in Weld County on approximately 79 acres located to the east of WCR 7 and north of State Highway 66. Proposed land uses include Mixed Use (including Commercial, Office, Retail, and Civic- 48 acres at full build out) and Residential - 61 acres at full build out. The final configuration and variety of the Mixed Use land is designed to contain flexible uses to best fit the community's future needs.. The purpose of this referral is to obtain the comments and recommendations of various governmental agencies and service providers as to the appropriateness of the annexation. Your comments are welcome and will assist the Board of Trustees and Planning Commission in their review of the proposal. We ask that your comments reach us no later than August 15. We ask that you forward your response directly to Samson, Pipis & Marsh, LLC, c/o Gary West, P.O. Box 1079, Longmont, CO 80502. Thank you for your cooperation and assistance. Very truly yours,*24_O_ Candace Bridgwater Town Clerk �ur l t c i<C—V2z.d /2C, PG, C/Yl Referral Notice.wpd 7/29/08 5:00 pm / 2008-2140 A Town of Mead 4 ' I P.O.Box 626 441 Third Street Mead-w Little Towo Mead,Colorado 80542-0626 With a Big Future' (970)5354477 CERTIFIED MAIL# 7007 1490 0004 3519 0305 August 1, 2008 Weld County Board of Commissioners P.O. Box 758 Greeley, CO 80632 RE: Notice of Public Hearing - Equinox Annexation to the Town of Mead Planning Commission- 7:00 P.M., Wednesday, August 20, 2008. Gentlemen: Please be advised that a public hearing before the Mead Planning Commission has been set to review and consider the annexation of a portion of the southwest quarter of section 22, Twp. 3 North, Range 68 West of the 6th P.M.. The property is owned by Equinox Mead, LLC, 9055 E. Mineral Circle, #100, Centennial, CO 80112 and Rodney J. Schmidt, 1873 Blue Mountain Road, Longmont, CO 80504 and is proposed to be developed with Mixed Use (including Commercial, Office, Retail, and Civic - 48 acres at full build out) and Residential (61 acres) of land uses. In accordance with C.R.S. § 31-12-108 (2), this notice has been sent to the Board of County Commissioners and County Attorney for Weld County, and to each special district or school district having territory within the area to be annexed. This notice has also been sent to service providers and those holding a franchise with the Town. Attached is a copy of the published public hearing notice, together with a copy of the applicant's petition for annexation and the adopted resolution finding substantial compliance and initiating annexation proceedings. As one of the Town's referral agencies, you have previously received copies of the"Letter of Intent"provided with the application, maps of the property location and a"concept plan" for the development of the property. Copies of the full application, as well as the full-sized maps submitted with the application are available for review in the Mead Town Hall, 441 - 3rd Street, Mead, Colorado. Written comments may be sent to Dan Dean, Town Manager, Box 626, Mead, CO 80542. Very truly yours Candace Bridgwater Town Clerk NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING MEAD PLANNING COMMISSION EQUINOX ANNEXATION NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Board of Trustees of the Town of Mead has adopted a Resolution of Substantial Compliance initiating annexation proceedings for the "Equinox Annexation," said Annexation being more particularly described in the following Resolution No. 24-R-2008. The Planning Commission of the Town of Mead will hold a Public Hearing commencing at 7:00 o'clock P.M., Wednesday, August 20, 2008, at the Mead Town Hall, 441 - 3rd Street, Mead, Colorado 80542, for the purpose of reviewing the petition and making a recommendation to the Board of Trustees regarding whether the property proposed to be annexed meets the applicable requirements of the statutes of the State of Colorado and is eligible for annexation to the Town of Mead, and to recommend the appropriate land use for the property, if requested. Any person may appear at the Public Hearing and be heard regarding the matters under consideration. Copies of the petition and supporting material submitted to the Town are on file and available for public inspection in the Office of the Town Clerk, at the Mead Town Hall, 441 - 3r° Street, Mead, Colorado 80542. Dated this 29`h day of July 2008. TOWN OF MEAD, COLORADO By: /s/Candace Bridgwater Town Clerk Equinox Annexation PA's 1 -6 PUD PETITION FOR ANNEXATION TO: THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF MEAD, COLORADO: We, Rodney J. Schmidt and Mead Partners Operating Company, LLC (Schmidt/Debrine property) and Equinox Mead, LLC by George R. Hanlon, Manager of Mead Land Venture, LLC, Gene A. Osborne of Mead Land Venture, LLC, New Frontier Bank, and Tom Schmidgall (Schmidt/Hurt property)the undersigned landowner(s), in accordance with Colorado law, hereby petition the Town of Mead and its Board of Trustees for annexation to the Town of Mead of the following described unincorporated territory located in the County of Weld and State of Colorado, to-wit: See legal description in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. As part of this petition, your petitioner further states to the Board of Trustees of Mead, Colorado, that: 1. It is desirable and necessary that the territory described in Exhibit A be annexed to the Town of Mead. 2. The requirements of C.R.S. sections 31-12-104 and 31-12-105, as amended, exist or have been met in that: a. Not less than one-sixth of the perimeter of the area proposed to be annexed is contiguous with the Town of Mead or will be contiguous with the Town of Mead within such time as required by 31-12-104. b. A community of interest exists between the area proposed to be annexed and the Town of Mead. c. The area proposed to be annexed is urban or will be urbanized in the near future. d. The area proposed to be annexed is integrated with or is capable of being integrated with the Town of Mead. e. No land within the boundary of the territory proposed to be annexed which is held in identical ownership, whether consisting of one tract or parcel of real estate or two or more contiguous tracts or parcels of real estate, has been divided into separate parts or parcels without the written consent of the landowner or landowners thereof, unless such tracts or parcels were separated by a dedicated street, road or other public way. 1 f. No land within the boundary of the area proposed to be annexed which is held in identical ownership, comprises twenty acres or more, and which, together with the buildings and improvements situated thereon has an assessed value in excess of two hundred thousand dollars ($200,0O0.00) for ad valorem tax purposes for the year next preceding the annexation, has been included within the area proposed to be annexed without the written consent of the landowner or landowners. g. No annexation proceedings have been commenced for any portion of the territory proposed to be annexed for the annexation of such territory to another municipality. h. The annexation of the territory proposed to be annexed will not result in the detachment of area from any school district. i. The annexation of the territory proposed to be annexed will not have the effect of extending the boundary of the Town of Mead more than three miles in any direction from any point of the boundary of the Town of Mead in any one year. j. Prior to completion of the annexation of the territory proposed to be annexed, the Town of Mead will have in place a plan for that area, which generally describes the proposed: Location, character, and extent of streets, subways, bridges, waterways, waterfronts, parkways, playgrounds, squares, parks, aviation fields, other public ways, grounds, open spaces, public utilities, and terminals for water, light, sanitation,transportation, and power to be provided by the Town of Mead; and the proposed land uses for the area; such plan to be updated at least once annually. k. In establishing the boundary of the territory proposed to be annexed, if a portion of a platted street or alley is to be annexed, the entire width of the street or alley has been included within the territory to be annexed. The Town of Mead will not deny reasonable access to any landowners, owners of any easement, or the owners of any franchise adjoining any platted street or alley which is to be annexed to the Town of Mead but is not bounded on both sides by the Town of Mead. 3. The owners of more than fifty percent of the area proposed to be annexed, exclusive of dedicated streets and alleys, have signed this petition and hereby petition for annexation of such territory. 4. Accompanying this petition are four copies of an annexation map containing the information following: a. A written legal description of the boundaries of the area proposed to be annexed; 2 5. Upon the Annexation Ordinance becoming effective, all lands within the area proposed to be annexed will become subject to all ordinances, rules and regulations of the Town of Mead, except for general property taxes of the Town of Mead which shall become effective as the January 1 next ensuing. 6. The zoning classification (land use) requested for the area proposed to be annexed is Residential and Mixed Use in Performance District 3. WHEREFORE,the following petitioner respectfully requests that the Town of Mead, acting through its Board of Trustees, approve the annexation of the area proposed to be annexed. By this acknowledgment, the undersigned hereby certify that the above information is complete and true. (If the applicant is not the owner(s)of the subject property, the owner(s), mortgage and/or lienholder shall also sign the Application.) Rodney J. Schmid 1( Owner. Date: _9 - ZU C) Rodney J. Schmidt STATE OF COLORADO) SS. COUNTY OF 12,oc.ticier-) The forego ing,igsttnn d ent was acknowledge before me this q day of 200-6 by 99<L r�c nn --- . My commission expires: z '1-11 ZOf O •• Witness My hand and official seal. '• A p� °2 Notary Public - 2 i :� Q Ov Owner. Date: 5 —9— 2-°`3 ......... G\`\`��.�. Mead Partners Operating, LLC by Rodney J. Schmidt STATE OF COLORADO) SS. COUNTY OF tci-z.r) The foregoing/ st ument was acknowledg d,before me this day of kflAy 20 t by i' Qc l&.y7 [ h m t o(.}- My commission expires: 2 CI 141 1 ?dfo QY p•Rti' Witness My hand and official seal. =�? p • O= ' U :0„ otary Public Jw p 3 Equinox Mead, Owner. Date: S-2g, Z o e Equinox Me , by George R. Hanlon, Jr., Manager of Equinox Mead Land Venture, LLC STATE OF COLORADO) ) SS. COUNTY OFArap(that.} r } The foregoing instrument was ackrpwlqdged before me this L-f U day of 114 20 by (ifDr-0-c Z. a-.1)1O7\.-, ILY VINZ My commission expires: JD/aO/1O • OTARY PUBLIC Witness My hand and official seal. SAT OF COLORADO . 0/30/2010 Notary Public .� Y onamOwner. �T�� Date: 5(28�c7 Equinox Mead, LLC by Gene A. Osborne, Equinox Mead Lan d Venture, LLC • STATE OF COLORADO) SS. COUNTY OF A. The foregoing inst ument was acknowledged before me this day 20Oby _(DS ) OILY VINZ NOTARY PUBLIC My commission expires: h/3D//O TE OF COLORADO Witness My hand and official seal_ M i cite; 10/30/2010 Notary Public gtrawat: Date: New Frontier Bank by STATE OF COLORADO) ) SS. COUNTY OF The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 20 by _ My commission expires: Witness My hand and official seal. Notary Public 4 Equinox Mead, Owner. Date: 7-42o S Equinox Mea , by George R Hanlon,Jr., Manager of Equinox Mead Land Venture, LLC • STATE OF COLORADO) ".��) SS. COUNTY OFAr ctkvt, The foregoing instrurpent was ackr8wiedged before me this mot"r1 day of ► ! 20 Oa by (.7ff) _)"<.1---a r)101"\—) l OT`s SLY VINZ My commission expires:1 D 7(1O OTARY PUBLIC Witness My hand and official seal. 7sTAT OF COLORADO Notary Public v 0/30t2010 ' E Owner. Date: 5(s3/03' Equinox Mead, LLC by Gene A. Osborne, Equinox Mead ancfVenture, LLC STATE OF COLORADO) ) SS. COUNTY OF ri)T' a8iO The foregoing inst ment was acknowledged before me this day 20Otby ��]f .OAa ILY VINZ (VOTARY f U8LIC My commission expires: t0/.3D//o TE OF COLMIADO Witness My hand and official seal. M f ores 10/30/2010 Notary Public j L,mer.lr/erf 1--13 v /b _ Date: '✓ New Frontier Bank by- /...t ), STATE OF COLORADO) ) SS. COUNTY OF4/-y4' ) The foregoing in tVIment was acknowl dged before me this.2U day of 20d by My commission expires: to -?- Witness My hand and official seal. 0� �•! A��/' ary Public SHARON L. BARUR X Owner. t/C C Date: 5714Tom Sc midget! STATE OF S9L-9RADOfa'4 SS. COUNTYOFO ) The foregoing instrument r'w,a-s acknowledged before me this day of 20 Q by �4'Dl4 9-4Arv1fn— I My commission expires: Witness My hand and official seal. el MOdIIIEE WHIM No ry Pu lic V , mittilsollain tam Applicant Applicant: c_e Date: 0,03 Mead Development Group by Roger Hollard STATE OF COLORADO) SS. COUNTY OF 7801143010:0}(1143010:0 y`��) p The„fo,{egoing instrument was acknowledged before me this C day of /—/ Y VINZ 20 Ubby (5OG1,r' tir7��a c�U N T Y PUBLIC �J STAT OF COLORADO My commission expires: Witness My hand and official seal. CrMy Commission Expires 10/30/2010 Notary Pub Landowner/Petitioner Date Signed Legal Description Mailing Address of Land Owned Rodney Schmidt 1873 Blue Mountain Road See Exhibit A Longmont, CO 80504 Mead Partners Operating Company, LLC See Exhibit A By Rodney J. Schmidt 1873 Blue Mountain Road Longmont, CO 80504 I 5 New Frontier Bank See Exhibit A Tom Schmidgall See Exhibit A Equinox Mead, LLC by George R. Hanlon,Jr., Manager of See Exhibit A Equinox Mead Land Venture, LLC 9055 East Mineral Circle, Suite 100, Centennial, CO 80112 • Equinox Mead, LLC by Gene A. Osborne of Equinox Mead Land Venture, LLC See Exhibit A 9055 East Mineral Circle, Suite 100, Centennial, CO 80112 Mead Development Group by Roger Hollard -See Exhibit A 9055 East Mineral Circle, Suite 100, Centennial, CO 80112 j AFFIDAVIT OF CIRCULATOR STATE OF COLORADO ss. COUNTY OF being first duly sworn upon oath, deposes and says that(he or she)was the circulator of this Petition for Annexation of lands to the Town of Mead, Colorado, consisting of[ ] pages including this page and that each signature hereon was witnessed by your affiant and is the signature of the person whose name it purports to be. Circulator STATE OF COLORADO ) ) SS. COUNTY OF The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this— day of _ 200 by My commission expires: Witness My hand and official seal. Notary Public 6 TETRA TECH..,,._.‘ lb EXHIBIT A A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED IN THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH,RANGE 68 WEST OF THE 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN,TOWN OF MEAD, COUNTY OF WELD,STATE OF COLORADO BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE WEST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 22 WHENCE THE SOUTHWEST CORNER BEARS SOUTH 00°26'23" EAST 2648.73 FEET, SAID LINE FORMING THE BASIS OF BEARING FOR THIS LEGAL DESCRIPTION; THENCE NORTH 88°50'51"EAST 30 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY OF WELD COUNTY ROAD NO. 7 AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING;THENCE ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 22 NORTH 88°50'51" EAST 1185.50 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WESTERLY BOUNDARY OF MULLIGAN RESERVOIR; THENCE ALONG THE BOUNDARY OF SAID MULLIGAN RESERVOIR THE FOLLOWING 15 COURSES; SOUTH 15°09'21" EAST 283.80 FEET;THENCE SOUTH 22°38'20" EAST 191.40 FEET;THENCE SOUTH 45°12'21" EAST 151.80 FEET; THENCE NORTH 64°29'39" EAST 129.30 FEET; THENCE NORTH 37°40'39" EAST 154.50 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 82°23'21" EAST 110.90 FEET;THENCE SOUTH 48°31'21" EAST 126.40 FEET; THENCE SOUTH ., 15°25'21" EAST 197.70 FEET;THENCE SOUTH 00°36'39" WEST 223.70 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 21°35'21" EAST 145.20 FEET;THENCE SOUTH 71°15'21" EAST 128.90 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 81°55'21" EAST 308.50 FEET; THENCE NORTH 67°28'39" EAST 175.20 FEET;THENCE NORTH 49°09'39" EAST 131.40 FEET;THENCE NORTH 23°17'39" EAST 192.26 FEET; THENCE NORTH 69°39'13" EAST 76.17 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT B OF RECORDED EXEMPTION NO. 1207-22-4-AMRE-2318; THENCE ALONG THE BOUNDARY OF SAID LOT B THE FOLLOWING THREE COURSES;THENCE SOUTH 01°09'47" EAST 575.55 FEET;THENCE SOUTH 88°49'54" WEST 318.27 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00°26'39" EAST 521.10 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF TRACT 2 OF WEINGARDT ESTATES; THENCE ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID TRACT 2 SOUTH 88°49'43" WEST 1076.97 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE EBERL AGRICULTURAL UNIT DEVELOPMENT; THENCE ALONG THE BOUNDARY LINE OF SAID EBERL AGRICULTURAL UNIT DEVELOPMENT THE FOLLOWING 2 COURSES; NORTH 00°26'23" WEST 303.71 FEET;THENCE SOUTH 88°49'55" WEST 1403.01 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF WELD COUNTY ROAD NO. 7; THENCE ALONG SAID LINE NORTH 00°26'23" WEST 475.78 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT A OF RECORDED EXEMPTION NO. 1207-22-3 RE3126; THENCE ALONG THE BOUNDARY OF SAID LOT A THE FOLLOWING 3 COURSES;THENCE NORTH 89°33'37" EAST 276.73 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00°23'23" WEST 255.26 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89°33'37" WEST 276.73 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EAST RIGHT-OF- WAY LINE OF WELD COUNTY ROAD NO. 7; THENCE ALONG SAID LINE NORTH 00°26'23" WEST 851.11 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. THE ABOVE DESCRIBED TRACT CONTAINS 77.300 ACRES MORE OR LESS. 1900 S.SUNSET STREET,SUITE I-F LONGMONT.CO B0501 TEL:303.772.5282 FAX 303.772.7039 www.tetratech.com PLANNING • LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE URBAN DESIGN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ARCHITECTURE Nuszer Kopatz Urban Design Associates 1117 Cherokee Street Denver, CO 80204 July 16, 2008 Mead Planning Commission & Board of Trustees NUSZER KOPATZ Town of Mead urban design°ss«°res PO Box 626 Mead, CO 80542 Re: Letter of Intent—Equinox Annexation PA 1-6 PUD Application Dear Planning Commission & Town Board Members: On behalf of Mead Development Group, I welcome the opportunity to present for your consideration the attached application for the annexation of approximately 78.9 acres of land into the Town of Mead, Colorado. • The proposed annexation plan comprises two parcels of land located in unincorporated Weld County, approximately three-quarters of a mile west of Interstate 25 on the northeast corner of State Highway 66 and Weld County Road 7. (See attached Vicinity Map). Proposed Land Uses The proposed bubble plan is a diagrammatic vision of the proposed land uses to be developed within the Equinox Annexation and Rezoning PA's 1-6 PUD. The overall vision for the PUD incorporates additional land parcels that are already annexed into the Town and other parcels that are planned to be annexed at a later time. Proposed land uses include Mixed Use (including Commercial, Office, Retail, and Civic) (—48 acres at full build out) and Residential (— 61 acres at full build out). This particular annexation application includes the land covered by PA's 1-3. Single Family Detached Residential uses are anticipated for PA-1 while Single Family Detached and Single Family Attached Residential and Mixed Use uses are anticipated for PA's 2-3. The final configuration and variety of the Mixed Use land is designed to contain flexible uses to best fit the community's future needs. In preparing the land use proposal and annexation request, the design team carefully considered the Town of Mead's future land use plan as depicted in the Town of Mead 2004 Comprehensive Plan. The character and pattern of surrounding land uses were also • considered, in understanding that future development should be compatible with existing 1 1 1 17 CHEROKEE STREET DENVER, COLORADO 80204 303.534.3881 fax 303.534.3884 www.nuszerkopaIzcorn and future development. In order to accomplish compatibility, the bubble plan is designed • with appropriate land uses that transition from lower density residential uses at the north perimeter to more intensive residential uses that surround the interior civic, mixed use and commercial uses. The Mixed-Use area planned for the southern perimeter is compatible with the commercial uses planned directly to the west and south across Highway 66. Traffic and Access The PUD plan proposes one full service, one three-quarter turn and one right-in/right-out access point along State Highway 66 and two full service access points on Weld County Road 7. The more southern of the two access points on Weld County Road 7 is envisioned as a roundabout that will serve the Equinox Annexation and Rezoning PA's 1- 6 PUD Application and Mead Place to the west. The roundabout is intended to promote safer speeds within the community and to reduce turning movement and wait times at the Weld County Road 7 and State Highway 66 intersection. The roundabout will direct the majority of traffic on Weld County Road 7 into the Mead Place and Equinox Annexation and Rezoning PA's 1-6 PUD developments. The northern entrance is intended primarily as a residential entrance to accommodate the remaining residential traffic associated with this project traveling north on Weld County Road 7. Thus, the character and amount of traffic on Weld County Road 7 north of this site is intended to remain similar to today's standard. Preliminary discussions of the plan with the Colorado Department of Transportation and • the Town of Mead staff have been very positive with the understanding that improvements along State Highway 66 and Weld County Road 7 will be necessary to serve the development. Mead Development Group has also begun discussions with CDOT about obtaining access permits for State Highway 66 and is aware of the permit application process. A copy of the Traffic Impact Analysis from LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc. is included in this submittal package for your review. Landscaping and Open Space The design team understands that one of the most important components of a successful community is its curb appeal and amenities. Thus, the proposed PUD provides for a generous amount of open space and parks within a variety of active and passive configurations. The proposal will meet the intent of Town of Mead's Comprehensive Plan for parks and open space. Parking will be set back a minimum of 20' from Weld County Road 7 and 50' from State Highway 66. Buildings will be set back a minimum of 40' (50' for PA's 2-6) from Weld County Road 7 and 50' from State Highway 66. In addition, a comprehensive and layered streetscape vision will be developed within these buffer areas, as well as within the internal community streets. The landscape will be developed to provide identity to each type of area and distinguish them from other areas. Buildings and Architecture The final plan of the community will entail provisions for appropriate residential and architectural controls, which will promote variety and continuity in building design, the • use of high quality building materials, and the use of architectural features appropriate to 2 the scale and character of the Town of Mead. The Equinox Annexation and Rezoning • PA's 1-6 PUD contains Housing Diversity Standards and a separate Design Guidelines document will be created during the platting phases. Water and Sewer Service According to the local water and sewer districts, water and sewer services are readily available to the Equinox Annexation and Rezoning PA's 1-6 PUD properties. The property will be primarily served by Longs Peak Water District and the Saint Vrain Sanitation District. The applicant has initiated discussions with both service districts. In closing, Mead Development Group is committed to working with the Board of Trustees and the Town of Mead staff to develop a master planned community that Mead will support and enjoy. We look forward to your support of this application. Please contact me with questions and requests for additional information at 303-534-3881 x 141. Sincerely, Randy Duzan, Principal Attachments: Vicinity Map Annexation Application CC: Joe Gerdom Gary West Dan Dean • 3 COUNTY ROAD 34 / WELKER AVE. n n C C O N COUNTY ROAD 32 D 0 v v C V MULLIGAN RESERVOIR rafl STATE HIGHWAY 66 • EQUINOX ANNEXATION PA's 1-6 PUD SITE FOSTER RESERVOIR OCOUNTY ROAD 28 Equinox Annexation PA's 1 -6 PUD VICINITY MAF Mead, Colorado OWNER: OPERA,1NG,co Date: July 16, 2008 °738i° 774-1822 NUSZ ER K0P, Scale : 1 " = 3000' NOM i ," • Equinox Annexation PA's 1 - 6 PUD PETITION FOR ANNEXATION TO: THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF MEAD, COLORADO: We, Rodney J. Schmidt and Mead Partners Operating Company, LLC (Schmidt/Debrine property) and Equinox Mead, LLC by George R. Hanlon, Manager of Mead Land Venture, LLC, Gene A. Osborne of Mead Land Venture, LLC, New Frontier Bank, and Tom Schmidgall (Schmidt/Hurt property) the undersigned landowner(s), in accordance with Colorado law, hereby petition the Town of Mead and its Board of Trustees for annexation to the Town of Mead of the following described unincorporated territory located in the County of Weld and State of Colorado, to-wit: See legal description in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. As part of this petition, your petitioner further states to the Board of Trustees of Mead, Colorado, that: 1 . It is desirable and necessary that the territory described in Exhibit A be annexed to the Town of Mead. 2. The requirements of C.R.S. sections 31-12-104 and 31-12-105, as amended, • exist or have been met in that: a. Not less than one-sixth of the perimeter of the area proposed to be annexed is contiguous with the Town of Mead or will be contiguous with the Town of Mead within such time as required by 31-12-104. b. A community of interest exists between the area proposed to be annexed and the Town of Mead. c. The area proposed to be annexed is urban or will be urbanized in the near future. d. The area proposed to be annexed is integrated with or is capable of being integrated with the Town of Mead. e. No land within the boundary of the territory proposed to be annexed which is held in identical ownership, whether consisting of one tract or parcel of real estate or two or more contiguous tracts or parcels of real estate, has been divided into separate parts or parcels without the written consent of the landowner or landowners thereof, unless such tracts or parcels were separated by a dedicated street, road or other public way. • 1 • f. No land within the boundary of the area proposed to be annexed which is held in identical ownership, comprises twenty acres or more, and which, together with the buildings and improvements situated thereon has an assessed value in excess of two hundred thousand dollars ($200,000.00) for ad valorem tax purposes for the year next preceding the annexation, has been included within the area proposed to be annexed without the written consent of the landowner or landowners. g. No annexation proceedings have been commenced for any portion of the territory proposed to be annexed for the annexation of such territory to another municipality. h. The annexation of the territory proposed to be annexed will not result in the detachment of area from any school district. i. The annexation of the territory proposed to be annexed will not have the effect of extending the boundary of the Town of Mead more than three miles in any direction from any point of the boundary of the Town of Mead in any one year. j. Prior to completion of the annexation of the territory proposed to be annexed, the Town of Mead will have in place a plan for that area, which generally describes the proposed: Location, character, and extent of streets, subways, bridges, waterways, waterfronts, parkways, playgrounds, squares, parks, aviation fields, other public ways, grounds, open spaces, public utilities, and terminals for water, light, sanitation; transportation, and power to • be provided by the Town of Mead; and the proposed land uses for the area; such plan to be updated at least once annually. k. In establishing the boundary of the territory proposed to be annexed, if a portion of a platted street or alley is to be annexed, the entire width of the street or alley has been included within the territory to be annexed. The Town of Mead will not deny reasonable access to any landowners, owners of any easement, or the owners of any franchise adjoining any platted street or alley which is to be annexed to the Town of Mead but is not bounded on both sides by the Town of Mead. 3. The owners of more than fifty percent of the area proposed to be annexed, exclusive of dedicated streets and alleys, have signed this petition and hereby petition for annexation of such territory. 4. Accompanying this petition are four copies of an annexation map containing the information following: a. A written legal description of the boundaries of the area proposed to be annexed; • 2 • 5. Upon the Annexation Ordinance becoming effective, all lands within the area proposed to be annexed will become subject to all ordinances, rules and regulations of the Town of Mead, except for general property taxes of the Town of Mead which shall become effective as the January 1 next ensuing. 6. The zoning classification (land use) requested for the area proposed to be annexed is Residential and Mixed Use in Performance District 3. WHEREFORE, the following petitioner respectfully requests that the Town of Mead, acting through its Board of Trustees, approve the annexation of the area proposed to be annexed. By this acknowledgment, the undersigned hereby certify that the above information is complete and true. (If the applicant is not the owner(s)of the subject property, the owner(s), mortgage and/or lienholder shall also sign the Application.) - Rodney J.Schmid / Owner: Date: —9 - ZC) o 0 Rodney J. Schmidt STATE OF COLORADO) SS. COUNTY OF Po<Uderj The foregoing,igstrument was acknowledge(' before me this q day of 20 0 by 77-c—ocvnEil , , gel, M -- ��u uuwrrnurr, • J ,e,r, ��ii My commission expires: a) H 2Ol o �° C,..••• ••..,. • Witness My hand and official seal. z- ' 4pSY .%. Notary Public a ( •d i U `•�= E 0v 2 % PV :vO K Owner: ' Date: 5 ,9- 2C°8 ''.,rSTATE. 0 Mead Partners Operating, LLC by Rodney J. Schmidt �'nnuiuu" STATE OF COLORADO) SS. COUNTY OF ldu') The fore oin st ument was acknowled before me this_� day of _ nrrrrnr 9 9 9 20 by N-ockv\Q 'I c h m. t `\``��‘0 vis •. ar ,, My commission expires: -2 �r4I Rio � f R1' •: Witness My hand and official seal. =co Op P/ °•0= otary Public -3 s v0" ;per; • 3 • Equinox Mead, Owner. Date: S- 261- 2-,P0 Equinox Me , by George R. Hanlon, Jr., Manager of Equinox Mead Land Venture, LLC STATE OF COLORADO) SS. COUNTY OF4p ak The foregoing instrument was acknQwl dged before me this m/ day of r is 20O43 by IIP.Or3-ultfiRn1C3NJ ILY VINZ My commission expires: ID/ Di RD OTARY PUBLIC Witness My hand and official seal. S AT OF COLORADO Notary Public .7 'y or1:1mi = 0/30/2010 Owner. \ . � Date: te8F�g Equinox Mead, LLC by Gene A. Osborne, Equinox Mead an Venture, LLC STATE OF COLORADO) SS. COUNTY OFA.rap ) �,•��' The foregoing instyument was acknowledged before me this �" day 20O by l7Jc"Xk.A.0Shi?rrr ) ILY VINZ • My commission expires: 10/30//O NOTARY PUBLICTE OF COLORADO .�Witness My hand and official seal. , M elves 10/30/2010 Notary Public Utnkdda/• fen: Date: New Frontier Bank by STATE OF COLORADO) SS. COUNTY OF The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 20_by My commission expires: Witness My hand and official seal. Notary Public • 4 • Equinox Mead, Owner. Date: S-29-7-n 8 Equinox Me , L by George R. Hanlon,Jr., Manager of Equinox Mead Land Venture, LLC STATE OF COLORADO) ) SS. COUNTY OF4pn ctiVickj n(,� The foregoing instrument was acknowledged oefore me this k--f(l day of I 9 20CY?, by l7tDro-C ,r<. &n ONJ -- J - ILY VINZ My commission expires:10/�/ID • �1OTARY PUBLIC Witness My hand and official sea(. SAT OF COLORADO Notary Public '� 'y o - 0/30/2010 Own en. - r . r— Date: (11O1 Equinox Mead, LLC by Gene A.Osborne, Equinox Mead iandrVenture, LLC STATE OF COLORADO) SS. COUNTY OF 7,4,.- The foregoing instyyuument was acknowledged before me this day 20O9by l7f{'X1C,/t 0 6h-5r C ) 1 ILY VINZ • My commission expires: 1013al NOTARY PUBLIC /O /// TE OF COLORADO Witness My hand and official seal. M I out 10!30/2910 Notary Public WS Gies itoidee: S d b r Omer. Date: a New Frontier Bank by; fr ✓}f • l Gt y STATE OF COLORADO) SS. COUNTYOFt(I-t-e, The foregoing in ttyument was acknowiedged before me this 3 ) day of .7-22. --/ 20a____by CGo —I ✓1� //�/� - O My commission expires: aO - Witness My hand and official seal. 9// ✓ /Jy��`— 0 ary Public• f SHARON L. BARER • • X Owner. Date: 571:214/ Tom Sc m>dgall STATE OF SeLCRADO r*t is ss. COUNTY OF*W5 ) The by foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of try 20(155_ My commission expires: Witness My hand and official seal. a Nem Es No ry Public4 Werni-_ am Applicant Applicant: . Date: Yz$3 Mead Development Group by Roger Hollard STATE OF COLORADO) �'SS. COUNTY OF�} Thel,.,o,c{egoing um ic r trument was cknowledged before me this ��" / /day of Y VINZ • 20 Abby J - HYD 110-r i_2 N T Y PUBLIC . i STAT OF COLORADO My commission expires: a _ - - .«••• Witness My hand and official seal. r�( ��My Commission Expires 10/30/2010 NootallotaryPPub�ic(! � Landowner/Petitioner Date Signed Legal Description Mailing Address I of Land Owned • Rodney Schmidt 1873 Blue Mountain Road See Exhibit A Longmont, CO 80504 Mead Partners Operating Company, LLC See Exhibit A By Rodney J. Schmidt 1873 Blue Mountain Road Longmont, CO 80504 • 5 • New Frontier Bank See Exhibit A Tom Schmidgall See Exhibit A Equinox Mead, LLC by George R. Hanlon, Jr., Manager of See Exhibit A Equinox Mead Land Venture, LLC 9055 East Mineral Circle, Suite 100, Centennial, CO 80112 Equinox Mead, LLC by Gene A. Osborne of Equinox Mead Land Venture, LLC See Exhibit A 9055 East Mineral Circle, Suite 100, Centennial, CO 80112 Mead Development Group by Roger Hollard ,See Exhibit A 9055 East Mineral Circle, Suite 100, Centennial, CO 80112 AFFIDAVIT OF CIRCULATOR STATE OF COLORADO ) ss. COUNTY OF , being first duly sworn upon oath, deposes and says that(he or she)was the circulator of this Petition for Annexation of lands to the Town of Mead, Colorado, • consisting of[ ] pages including this page and that each signature hereon was witnessed by your affiant and is the signature of the person whose name it purports to be. Circulator STATE OF COLORADO ) SS. COUNTY OF The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 200 by My commission expires: Witness My hand and official seal. Notary Public • 6 TETRA TECH . ,,._: . lit Ili EXHIBIT A A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED IN THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 68 WEST OF THE 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, TOWN OF MEAD, COUNTY OF WELD, STATE OF COLORADO BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE WEST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 22 WHENCE THE SOUTHWEST CORNER BEARS SOUTH 00°26'23" EAST 2648.73 FEET, SAID LINE FORMING THE BASIS OF BEARING FOR THIS LEGAL DESCRIPTION; THENCE NORTH 88°50'51" EAST 30 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY OF WELD COUNTY ROAD NO. 7 AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 22 NORTH 88°50'51" EAST 1185.50 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WESTERLY BOUNDARY OF MULLIGAN RESERVOIR; THENCE ALONG THE BOUNDARY OF SAID MULLIGAN RESERVOIR THE FOLLOWING 15 COURSES; SOUTH 15°09'21" EAST 283.80 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 22°38'20" EAST 191.40 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 45°12'21" EAST 151.80 FEET; THENCE NORTH 64°29'39" EAST 129.30 FEET; THENCE NORTH 37°40'39" EAST 154.50 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 82°23'21" EAST 110.90 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 48°31'21" EAST 126.40 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 15°25'21" EAST 197.70 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00°36'39" WEST 223.70 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 21°35'21" EAST 145.20 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 71°15'21" EAST 128.90 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 81°55'21" EAST 308.50 FEET; THENCE NORTH 67°28'39" EAST 175.20 FEET; THENCE NORTH 49°09'39" EAST 131.40 FEET; THENCE NORTH 23°17'39" EAST 192.26 FEET; THENCE NORTH 69°39'13" EAST 76.17 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT B OF RECORDED EXEMPTION NO. 1207-22-4-AMRE-2318; THENCE ALONG THE BOUNDARY OF SAID LOT B THE FOLLOWING THREE COURSES; THENCE SOUTH 01°09'47" EAST 575.55 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 88°49'54" WEST 318.27 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00°26'39" EAST 521.10 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF TRACT 2 OF WEINGARDT ESTATES; THENCE ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID TRACT 2 SOUTH 88°49'43" WEST 1076.97 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE EBERL AGRICULTURAL UNIT DEVELOPMENT; THENCE ALONG THE BOUNDARY LINE OF SAID EBERL AGRICULTURAL UNIT DEVELOPMENT THE FOLLOWING 2 COURSES; NORTH 00°26'23" WEST 303.71 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 88°49'55" WEST 1403.01 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF WELD COUNTY ROAD NO. 7; THENCE ALONG SAID LINE NORTH 00°26'23" WEST 475.78 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT A OF RECORDED EXEMPTION NO. 1207-22-3 RE3126; THENCE ALONG THE BOUNDARY OF SAID LOT A THE FOLLOWING 3 COURSES; THENCE NORTH 89°33'37" EAST 276.73 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00°23'23" WEST 255.26 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89°33'37" WEST 276.73 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EAST RIGHT-OF- WAY LINE OF WELD COUNTY ROAD NO. 7; THENCE ALONG SAID LINE NORTH 00°26'23" WEST 851.11 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. THE ABOVE DESCRIBED TRACT CONTAINS 77.300 ACRES MORE OR LESS. ii 1900 S.SUNSET STREET,SUITE I-F LONGMONT,CO 80501 TEL:303.772.5282 FAX 303.772.7039 www.tecratech.com TOWN OF MEAD • LAND USE CODE FORM D-2 CONCEPTUAL PLAN APPLICATION AND DECISION RECORD FOR A MAJOR LAND USE CHANGE Applicable Section(s): Copies Required: A. Conceptual Plan Submission Requirements. 1. Applicant's name, address and telephone number: Mead Development Group; 9055 East Mineral Circle, Suite 100, Centennial, CO 80112 Ph. 303-726-2147 2. Legal description of the property proposed for the land use change: See Exhibit A attached. 3. Proposed land use change located in Mead Performance District No. 3. • 3. Give a brief non-legal description of the existing land use of the site and of the general character of the use of adjacent lands. The existing land use is primarily agricultural. One single-family residence is located on the property. The adjacent lands are primarily agricultural with very low density single-family residential to the north, south and east. The Mead Place community has been approved to the west and will contain mixed use, commercial, and residential when constructed. 5. Give a brief non-legal description of the proposed land use change including the number of living units, type of home occupation proposed, the placement of a mobile home, etc. If the proposed land use change involves the annexation of land, the applicant must submit a petition and supporting documents in the form prescribed by C.R.S. 31-12-101, et seq. In addition, the applicant shall post a bond or other security as required by Section 16-20-40 of the Mead Municipal Code. The proposed land uses include categories of single-family detached residential and mixed use. The mixed use category can include commercial, retail, office, civic, single-family attached, single-family detached, parks, and open space areas. The maximum number of residential units allowed is 1,143 and the maximum mixed-use square footage allowed is 568,617 square feet. There are no home occupations proposed at this time. Annexation is required for 2 of the parcels within the Equinox Annexation and Rezoning PA's 1-6 PUD Application. An annexation petition is attached for those parcels. 6. Provide a sketch plan of the proposed land use change, including a site analysis consisting of a map, plot plan or diagram showing the total acreage, abutting landowners • and land uses, streets, highways, utilities that will service the proposed development; and major physical features, including drainage and the location of natural hazards. [attach maps and sketches as necessary] • See attached plans 7. A master development plan, if the land use change is proposed to be constructed in stages requiring separate reviews and approvals. See Tab 11 8. Provide an elevation drawing of the proposed structure(s) showing height and describing the exterior materials. [attach drawings as necessary] Elevations of the proposed structures will be provided during the platting stages. 9. The fiscal impact analysis, Form D-4. See Tab 2 10. Provide other information that the applicant believes will assist the Planning Commission and the Board of Trustees in making a fair decision. [attach additional sheets as necessary] See attached documents in the notebook. 11. Signature of the Applicant: By this acknowledgment, the undersigned hereby certify that the above information is complete and true. (If the applicant is not the owner(s) of the subject property, the owner(s), mortgage and/or lienholder shall also sign the Application.) Rodney J. Schmidt • x Owner Date: S f - loot?, Rodney J..Schmidt STATE OF COLORADO) ) SS. COUNTY OF fxuidtcr) The foregoing ipstryment was acknowledged before me this c day of 1 20 OA by d<o d/let) J ��l M io/�— `p��nivunmign0. i J ,c OAVI$ My commission expires: 2-1I4ko,a ` "RV m ' O� Witness My hand and official seal. a • 0. Notary Public Puev /T. X Owner: Date: 5 "g - l0c'ts Mead Partners Operating, LLC by Rodney J. Schmidt STATE OF COLORADO) SS. COUNTY OFi3u*fr ) The foregoinginstrument was acknowledged before me this 4 day of Met- • 20 by iiI-e�rl.� D . Sc V� n1 i CA 4— ) 2 :t(OeteG4ARy: • My commission expires: Z11'02-0,0 = ; ? 1 Witness My hand and official seal. a �G o= Notary Public °;q OF 0to tomilinmo Equinox Mead, Owner Date: s Z8- Zoog Equinox Mead LL y eorge R. Hanlon, Jr., Manager of Equinox Mead Land Venture, LLC STATE OF COLORADO) SS. COUNTY OFicainhct . The foregoing jpstrument was acknowledged before me this ^�Jv clay of 20 O@ by c-7 ct'.p.—_,4? -' on , NOTA PUBLIC My commission expires: )O/3O/1 v STATE OF COLORADO Witness My hand and official seal. F:774 y cam ss;on expires 10/30/2010 O Notary Public ` _ Owner: .1 Date: 5/'LS/oe Equinox Mead, LLC by Gene A. Osborne, Equinox Mead Land Venture, LLC • STATE OF COLORADO) SS. • COUNTY OF tocch The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 68 day of [CAA N7_, 20 by Crcnork hoer*r 7 NOTAP, P IBLIC I STATE OF CULORADO My commission expires: 1O/3D/to �, • My mission =xcras 10/0/2010 Witness My hand and official seal. L7 L Notary Public Owner: Date: New Frontier Bank by STATE OF COLORADO) SS. COUNTY OF The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 20by • My commission expires: Witness My hand and official seal. 3 • , /alAA My commission expires: "Z1 l`f 12°1 n / 1 e Witness My hand and official seal. ( --. _ �� G t o= c s\ P u e� ,r,Q�: Notary Public 9.- -d'Tq• �oFr�.... o,`` no Equinox Mead, Owner: Date: SC' L8- Zoo 5 Equinox Mead LL y eorge R. Hanlon, Jr., Manager of Equinox Mead Land Venture, LLC STATE OF COLORADO) SS. COUNTY OP/IffaPthLY The fo egoing Astrument was acknowledged before me this ay o n 20 00 byi-R Ian1nrl NOTA PUBLIC) STATE OF COLORADO My commission expires: 1O/3p11O '� Witness My hand and official seal -Kerr; Expires 10/30/2010 Notary Public C Owner: -,, * _ - Date: VS8/as Equinox Mead, LLC by Gene A. Osborne, Equinox Mead Land Venture, LLC • STATE OF COLORADO) ) SS. COUNTY OF A YOpnhLP The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me th• is 68} day of 20 by Crunc A on{ -- T t 9 - NOTAP, Pr BLIC STATE OF C LORADO My commission expires: )O/3o�io N4O4< ^�" • Witness My hand and official seal. teg mission Expires 10/30/2010 / C/. Notary Public s✓ Owner: Date: 3a o r New Frontier Bank by ha, PteC , STATE OF COLORADO) SS. COUNTY OF%(Y44c') 6� The foregoing instf ument was cknowledged before me this-3U day of , 20 by -cJ�� „to �..y� ��A .�q9Y p My commission expires: lv %-l/ 9i^;, Witness My hand and official seal. • 5Aa5r 3 � 1c `, iTe .. ,"�_ £OF' CLLv.y • Notary Public y( Owner: c�j Date: �� Tom chmidgall STATE OFee6ARABej- +St'`.-Sorer SS. COUNTY OF rra The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this I* day of miry 20�U by \t- 5 -Arret tiff— My commission expires: Witness My hand and official seal. KEDIEUGENESCNIEUR N to Public onotravm► • Applicant w�� s"" as • Applicant: Date: 7��oe) Mead Development Group by Roger Hollard STATE OF COLORADO) SS. COUNTY OF,Ary rtfi • The foregoin9_instrument was mcknowledged before me this e 20 aa. by Ko91-(' -{-}o l) J EMI Y V NZ NOTAR . UBLIC My commission expires: /0/3Dh D STATE OF COLORADO ♦_J Witness My hand and official seal. • c'Y res 10/30/2010 Notary Public *****************APPLICANT NOT TO WRITE BELOW THIS LINE******************* B. Review Agency Comments. 1. Building Official: 2. Town Engineer 3. Town Attorney: 4. Other Referrals: • C. Further information requested, if any: 4 • D. Action by the Planning Commission: 1. The application is complete. Yes_ No_ 2. The application is for a Major Land Use Change. Yes_ No_ 3. The requirements of the Mead Land Use Code have been satisfied. Yes No 4. If the application is for the annexation of property, has the annexation question been submitted to, and approved by the electorate? Yes_ No 5. The application is: o Approved o Disapproved o approved with the following conditions: a) b) c) • (attach additional conditions as necessary) DONE by the Mead Planning Commission of Mead, Colorado, this_day of , 20 ATTEST: Secretary to the Commission Chairman E. Action by the Board of Trustees. 1. The application is complete. Yes No 2. The application is for a Major Land Use Change. Yes No 3. The requirements of the Mead Land Use Code have been satisfied. Yes No 4. The application is: o approved o disapproved o approved with the following conditions: a) • b) 5 • c) (attach additional conditions as necessary) DONE by the Mead Board of Trustees of Mead, Colorado, this_day of , 20 ATTEST: Town Clerk Mayor • • 6 TOWN OF MEAD LAND USE CODE • FORM D-4 FISCAL ANALYSIS (Required for all Preliminary and Final Applications) (for Major Land Use Changes) Applicable Section(s): Copies Required: Applicant's name, address and telephone number: Mead Development Group 9055 East Mineral Circle, Suite 100 Centennial, CO 80112 Ph:303-726-2147 Name of the Project: Equinox Annexation and Rezoning PA's 1-6 PUD Application REVENUES. A. Recurring Revenues: 1. Property Tax. Market value all single family units [64,750,000]('1 x factor [ 7.96 % ](2) =Assessed Valuation [5,154,100] • Market value all multi-family units [215,550,000]t'1 x factor [7.96 % r=Assessed Valuation [17,157,780] Market value all mobile home units [N/Al(') x factor[7.96 7.96 % 1(2) =Assessed Valuation [ N/A ] Market value all non-residential structures [68,234,040]i" x factor[ 29% 1(2) =Assessed Valuation [19,787,871.6] Total Assessed Valuation [42,099,752] Total Assessed Valuation [42,099,752] x Town mill levy [ 11.522 mills 1(3) = Town Property Tax Revenue [485,073.3425] Total Assessed Valuation [42,099,752] x St. Vrain School mill levy [ 37.798 mills 1(3) = School Property Tax Revenue [1,591,286.426] Total Assessed Valuation [42,099,752] x Mt. View Fire District mill levy [ 7.817 mills 1(3)= Fire District Property Tax Revenue [329,093.7614] Page 1 of 8 (1)Developer's projected market value. (2)Call county assessor to determine what factor to use in order to obtain current assessed value of proposed development • from market value in the area. (3)Contact the Town Clerk for current factors. Mead - D-4 Form LUC - Revised 1-31-06.doc January 31, 2006 Total Assessed Valuation [42,099,752] x Weld County mill levy[ 16.804 mills ](3) = County Property Tax Revenue [707,444.2326] • Total Assessed Valuation [42,099,752] x St. Vrain San. Dist. mill levy [ .197 mills )(3) = St. Vrain San. Dist. Tax Revenue [8,293.6511] Total Assessed Valuation 1142,099,752] x all other mill levies [ 4.253 mills 1(i) = Other Property Tax Revenue [179,050.2453] Total Property Tax Revenue [3,300,241.659] 2. Sales Tax. Population in the development[2,743*] x the last year's per capita collection [ $48.46 ](3) = total annual sales tax revenue [132,925.78] Estimated gross retail sales within the development [unknown] x 2%131 = total annual sales tax revenue [Not Available] 3. Sewer Revenue. Population in the development[2.743*] x the last year's per capita collection J $75.21 ](3) = total annual sewer revenue [N/A****] 4. Other Revenue (taxes, fees, permits, etc.). • Population in the development [2,743*] x the last year's per capita collection[ $65.80 ](3) =total other revenue [180,489.40] Nonresidential - business licenses, liquor licenses, etc.(3) =total annual other revenue [Not Available] TOTAL RECURRING REVENUE [3,613,656] B. One-Time Revenues. 1. Building Permits. Market value of structure(s) [348,534}040]1"x factor[ .0099375 + $30.00/BP ) = building permit revenue [3,465,057.023**] 2. Use Taxes. Market value of structure(s) [348,534,040)1') x 50% x 2% = use tax revenue [3,485,340.4] 3. Sewer Plant Investment. Page 2 of 8 (1)Developer's projected market value. (2)Call county assessor to determine what factor to use in order to obtain current assessed value of proposed development from market value in the area. • (3)Contact the Town Clerk for current factors. Mead- D-4 Form LUC - Revised 1-31-06.doc January 31, 2006 Total taps x factor [ $6,000.00 ]t3f = total PIF [ N/A**** 4. Storm drainage. • Number of dwelling units [1,143*] x $131 = residential storm drainage impact fees [149,733] Square feet of nonresidential development [568,617] x $0.08/sq.ft. = nonresidential storm drainage impact fees [45,489.36] 5. Transportation. Number of dwelling units [1,143*] x$1,350 = residential transportation impact fees [1,543,050] Square feet of nonresidential development [568,617] x $0.37/sq.ft. = nonresidential transportation impact fees [210,388.29] 6. Open Space. Number of dwelling units [1,143*] x$1,852 = residential open space impact fees [2,116,836] Square feet of nonresidential development[568,617] x $0.47/sq.ft. = nonresidential open space impact fees [267,249.99] 7. Police Protection. Number of dwelling units [1,143*] x $50 • = residential police protection impact fees [57,150.00] Square feet of nonresidential development[568,617] x $0.01/sq.ft. = nonresidential police protection impact fees [5,686.17] 8. Municipal Facilities. Number of dwelling units [1,143*] x $1, 697 = residential municipal facilities impact fees [1,939,671.00] Square feet of nonresidential development[568,617] x $0.43/sq.ft. = nonresidential municipal facilities impact fees [244,505.31] 9. Park System. Number of dwelling units [1,143*] x $462 = residential park system impact fees [528,066.00] 10. Recreation Center. Number of dwelling units [1,143*] x $1, 683 = residential recreation center impact fees [1,923,669.00] Page 3 of 8 ii)Developer's projected market value. (2)Call county assessor to determine what factor to use in order to obtain current assessed value of proposed development • from market value in the area. (')Contact the Town Clerk for current factors. Mead - D-4 Form LUC - Revised 1-31-06.doc January 31, 2006 11. Downtown Revitalization (public facilities). Number of dwelling units [1,143`] x$304 • =residential downtown revitalization impact fees [347,472.00] 12. Capital Equipment. Number of dwelling units [1,143'] x $316 = residential capital equipment impact fees [361,188.00] Square feet of nonresidential development [568,617] x$0.09/sq.ft. = nonresidential capital equipment impact fees [51,175.53] TOTAL ONE TIME REVENUE [16,741,727.07] II. EXPENDITURES. A. Recurring Costs. 1. Street Maintenance. Acres in development [108.6] x 4% x factor [ $2,287.00 ](3) =total street maintenance costs [248,368.20] 2. Police Protection. Projected population at full development[2,743`] x per capita cost of police protection [ $23.87 ](3) • =total police protection costs [65,475.41] Square feet of nonresidential development [568,617] x [unknown](3) = nonresidential police protection costs [Not Available] 3. General Government. Projected population at full development [2,7431 x per capita cost of general government [ $87.18 ]tai = total general government costs [239,134.74] Square feet of nonresidential development [568,617] x [unknown]t3) = nonresidential general government costs [Not Available] 4. Parks and Recreation. Projected population at full development [2,7431 x per capita cost of park maintenance I $10.00 113) = total park maintenance costs [27,430.00] 5. Sewer Collection and Treatment. Page 4 of 8 (1)Developer's projected market value. (2)Call county assessor to determine what factor to use in order to obtain current assessed value of proposed development • from market value in the area. (' Contact the Town Clerk for current factors. Mead - D-4 Form LUC - Revised 1-31-06.doc January 31, 2006 Projected population at full development [2,743*] x per capita cost of sewer collection and treatment [ $100.20 ]tat=total sewer costs [N/A***] • 6. Storm Water and Drainage. Projected population at full development [2,743*] x per capita cost of storm water and drainage maintenance [unknown?) =total storm water costs [Not Available] Square feet of nonresidential development [568,617] x [unknown?) = nonresidential storm water costs [Not Available] TOTAL RECURRING COSTS [580,408.35] B. One-Time Costs. 1. Park and Recreation. Projected population at full development [2,743*] x .001 facilities per capita x 5,000 sq.ft. x average cost per sq.ft. for recreation facilities J $65.00 ]tat = total recreation facilities costs [891,475.00] 2. Sewer Plant. Projected population at full development [2,743*] x gallons per capita [ 120 gal. e)x cost per gallon of capacity[ $3.50 ]tat=total cost of sewer plant [ N/A***] • TOTAL ONE-TIME COSTS [891,475.00] TOTAL RECURRING REVENUES [798,488] TOTAL RECURRING EXPENDITURES [580,408.35] DIFFERENCE [218,080] TOTAL ONE-TIME REVENUES [16,741,727.07] TOTAL ONE-TIME EXPENDITURES [891,475.00] DIFFERENCE [15,850,252.07] NOTE: *Assumes a maximum total buildout of 1,143 dwelling units at an average rate of 2.4 people per dwelling unit. **Assumes 50 total commercial units that require building permits. *** Fees will be paid to St. Vrain Sanitation District. ************************************************************************* Page 5 of 8 i't Developer's projected market value. (2)Call county assessor to determine what factor to use in order to obtain current assessed value of proposed development • from market value in the area. (3)Contact the Town Clerk for current factors. Mead - D-4 Form LUC - Revised 1-31-06.doc January 31, 2006 III. Signature of the Applicant. By this acknowledgment, the undersigned hereby certify that the above information is complete and true. • (If the applicant is not the owner(s)of the subject property, the owner(s), mortgage and/or lienholder shall also sign the Application.) Rodney J.Schrtf t� y Owner. Date: 5/28/$ Rodney J. Schmidt STATE OF COLORADO) SS. COUNTY OFARAfl 0't) fore oing instrument wars,acknowled ed before me this (7?`7 da o 20 Cby r�t� �, clf'l1(hlf E I VINZ My commission expires: i0/40/ NOTARY PUBLIC Witness My hand and official seal. '•" E OF COLORADO ' ' . - '/30/2010 Notary Public % Owner Date: 6 'cl— zcc 3 Mead Partners Operating, LLC by Rodney J. Schmidt STATE OF COLORADO) SS. COUNTY OF ?balder) • The for9goin$instrument was acknowledged before me this q day of l ' I(x.' 20 C by (Coot At/ Sc �N Tnlir' J , Li�'� My commission expires: 2 1 c z-84.O Witness My hand and offici4 s I! 414 `z A �r USt. V € Notary Public $9 , 6LI0c Equinox Mead '., pFCo`ED.C%`` OwneK /Ilium inn r: 6 Date: Jrzg- Zaa� Equinox a d, by George R. Hanlon, Jr., Manager of Equinox Mead Land Venture, LLC STATE OF COLORADO) SS. COUNTY OFk )) #e foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 20 by C7rrr✓ir t., ( _o-n1o1"\ D - -- My commission expires: /D/3p/l p EMILY VINZ NOTARY PUBLIC Page 6 of 8 STATE OF COLORADO in Developer's projected market value. - -4 m Call county assessor to determine what factor to use in order toOtd em yal J/apppsed development • from market value in the area. ")Contact the Town Clerk for current factors. Mead - D-4 Form LUC - Revised 1-31-06 January 31, 2006 Witness My hand and official seal. Notary Publi CyY�! /1 • Owner: �Q�� Date: 57Z8/Do \� Equinox Mead, LLC by Gene A. Osborne, Equinox Mead Lan Venture, LLC STATE OF COLORADO) SS. COUNTY OFftrapali ) EMILY VINZ •TARY PUBLIC The foregoin instrument was acknowledged before me this day • • •..i • • •RADO 20 by On-tr; O,S 9 X)T K My •r. ission Expires 10/30/2010 My commission expires: Witness My hand and official seal. , Notary Publi Owner. Date: New Frontier Bank by STATE OF COLORADO) SS. COUNTY OF The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 20 by • My commission expires: Witness My hand and official seal. Notary Public )C Owner: 011/5Date: ctZ �0 Tom Schmid all r I STATE OFE969Rfls9) kcrt VVfl SS. COUNTY OF*$`15 ) � The yoregoing instrument before me this IA day of Vyl 20 N_e I My commission expires: / 1 Witness My hand and official seal. circa__ i r_ BE No Public L iN0►rrlr Paean Page 7 of 8 (')Developers projected market value. (2)Call county assessor to determine what factor to use in order to obtain current assessed value of proposed development • from market value in the area. ")Contact the Town Clerk for current factors. Mead - D-4 Form LUC - Revised 1-31-06 January 31, 2006 Witness My hand and official seal. • 67-Cb C� Notary Publi Owner: % � Date: 7/Z9D6 Equinox Mead, LLC by Gene A. Osborne, Equinox Mead Land Venture, LLC STATE OF COLORADO) SS. COUNTY OFRpct}j6C) , EMILY VINZ �uV' TARY PUBLIC 20 43 he foregoinginstrument was acknowledged before me this v day f ! RADO by 07/P'X1P-; as hnrnt My ission Expires 10/30/2010 My • Witness My ��"}/� /) Witness My hand and official seal. �/Y C vJ Notary Publ. _ Owner: A Date:- 5/310 r New Frontier Bank Al STATE OF COLORADO) ) SS. COUNTY OF i// ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this y 50 day of 20 cif by �PR • My commission expires: G-9-7/ ' y p , Witness My hand and official seal. t5� ems- Notary Public 'C Owner. r/ Date: L dip c�9� ��r J Tom Schmid all E (1 F CV\' STATE OF`£9L-AL w v ) SS. COUNTY OF*$rn5 )20Thee foregoing instrument was OA before me this l 1"` day of hell y My commission expires: Witness My hand and official seal. KETTNEMEOMER N to Public C _ 11AlsCatlllLdm„is * *040abilatiosai,gusto Page 7 of 8 t'r Developer's projected market value. w Call county assessor to determine what factor to use in order to obtain current assessed value of proposed development • from market value in the area. m Contact the Town Clerk for current factors. • Mead -D-4 Form LUC - Revised 1-31-06 January 31,2006 Applicant Applicant Date: 57t 7o& • Mead Development Group by Roger Hollard EMILY VINX / NOTARY PUBLIC € STATE OF COLORADO) STATE OF COLORADO SS. COUNTY OF rnn[ ) � � MyC®mnri�.s Ewifei§10/9@/2010 he fore oin"glinstrumenrtLLwas acknowledged before me thisC41 day of �CQ 20 by 7t C.r 4tIIo r ' My commission__ expires: __ / �Witness My hand and official seal. � L rdnNotary Public • Page 8 of 8 ")Developers projected market value. m Call county assessor to determine what factor to use in order to obtain current assessed value of proposed development • from market value in the area. (3)Contact the Town Clerk for current factors. Mead - D-4 Form LUC - Revised 1-31-06 January 31, 2006 (4 8., U zzz^ = 1114 o ¢ q4S. "=2NNwp≤WQ„a Om R2 Cu NUNNFPLOVZ UWW NSz 0 Fri �zd ii � $W 4w�'oN v"i�zt� 'o omw� <rroo v gdgl Hw �S _�znc2 FE^ wo.- rw d' aF io tm'�s '=rno� LL m" ooi� = „� W 0o x wNw g� z _ F$ ^o oox_`o. _o3n�ooC <Fiz Q SFg so yoo g,G0*,- r�N g!LI.,i .. >oV 8 s g 'off i U' o ,S-Spy2 PA 3Ow V z-„2,-,,,,,„„0„.„„..„,- -wnw ~Oon3Fo ��o wdi k 'Y" S8 2 NOa '-o w w=Ooom w V71 w z1 oN 11'6 HILwowi 'o^�'xwrcon 0W� ogJFoo Gm J 1i ; 8� 8� a > � o _ m m a i 1 Cj 0 �3 iZ'�'0t5 s �nm3o n=S vi -Ls a a i k t IVS Oo Or LLil NVwwxw_Zn >2 wJV a Zw w i1 Zzo Whmroo0 •'t'°OoinTo J3 O pt wz v,ip t . w 0 fl'ge pL' oa w� _ x"� "<'o oso9�oNm m^i 30o3rim�ti rc 8 0$ awo o' o wire-0�Nr�w zz0' 0I '-Cu mo Qag8 o3F ! w!0000G:Eum i"WmY zp wz�Gm oN R. o x t "o o z"'LLJ3za'I"v rcx N z,$ < , w € 3 0 0No'9'n,Y. L:j4.'" murwh �F n a x o �Nn m 'o rc'nh '- m a iwo iro waarnox�wnwnw�^n?"toF.�wzoN nW z 3 m 8 ON°5 gga n,0„oaAioy.2.8:8-2-�" wzy - zY 0 z o wzs w&� 0}�^S. �o il. GnwE.L 1ng°io3e'ao 03 rc o N•-s.... Sg0 N"ta<q§una'oih_mi o?oziiel ci p aI w ?x>� $no -',, s�-m�f9,nx ,fit, ? -,,,..,:4 o o 20 $ Cu w 6 u % o x �5 mg .0 o,s� Smom� rc i 2iS. t'=ah".2¢ &§ r om o o o Y • QWO9w y~5 2°6'8'868,8:R.0 bb2n S�m2f�n0=,-,°• =Q2�200nN bi a si V V 2 zz= 0 Ox oio- zaw0 o.8-x,o NW w Wv N O 3= 0 8'8 55 ,=F/. 2 5 x1OUo <od ghggdrvr�lrm�vOi�.lrx-�nFw�o NOz23J< r2 �-�- m 0 x O U x0 -X00 F.J < F< Y< 9 NwOy 0 El V lVL ZFOJ ZV U zV m w¢ 8n - wa �/ sLLto a NNNp ZZ w NW Iw w FEO ¢ W mO3 ry &O 2 00 Z a oa O Z 22 o 2 I m Z Z W Q wli0 a 8 Fw 8 Z a 8 J a N O o oa S ti 0 S Or J 50 N Or o S nO ouzo 00 'a a m o� 'a x cm� o� ₹ K 0 om 3 x Q r z w-i z o 2 g o W 3 Y Y�Z gron zz,� z z Z � � pp ¢can a o o Si 3 0 o H 3 N o a i N Q W F 82 -83. N 3 N -S 't ? N QSQ s- 3 Z E 3 3 3 3 Z Z W^O� 0 0 O N O CuO gi O O O Z cdKZ O o 0 O ZC V 2 Q Z U d Z J.0 O S F Z O S_ 3 m N tS 3 S bl cS O� a O¢� O9� O¢� C < Ldi 0CL m¢ 0O K 00 a Oo < co �V = ¢O IY D O 5>- O 5' N O VY Y F o o Lvl 2 o 6N' a U c.z o 0 Cu 0 0 5 Cu i5] W W = o w 0 z o w Z o wo s gtiow o op7 u o zmo 0 C 0 o 0 5 orcr H1 S9w on 'o 0 w a e ca do �� 9 z H 'L o < 0; N o0 3 3 0 so 0F.O Z OC 0 3 n F . pw Ww32O0 o Q Gig 0602 o5wu =S a 28O-' 2 owgo g z rcw oo8� Cu N ire ¢ i DrimZ m� o <k1 i O o8=° 3 E lx p o is 0 n '',Tit v. SNN " a a oo � n x 5 3 o O g a o z$ o 1 w a L0450 - oQ i N m w a • `-w' I o o . og--, N 0 i t u z5 Cu0 <° o W{{ H w0 L1,i \ 0 4 . - $ o �r 2.22 t o — < > 2 3 ao= `, z p o =a _� m 'ibi" o w y owo w s a mgB E .c , E vzoi ! z12 E 1w 2 ri CU{ N O zrc m o l7 w 5528 g O U ax o _ V : f §106 oY$ o I N 2 zzm oo'.....f .,r O $ �o o w w of m wi cc rc zt ..: $ z m ozo N O I z u. a a wa Y oW$ z i LL "9 .E2 u o¢ z II�o O r Q FMwWmw LL` ¢J3o 'G C 0, Uwm x 8 i 'YE m Wa 4 a _� �am� 6 rc V raircr a C 6f'_m g in f Sven aru ri wxa.wi a,Vfl0N.\ ^S\S.S\wvn-ioo oagVS OxwiOC "4 mvo-t Soot Li H�an.e.0 INN >- V 4,7,0W c W Odo• m 0- ZU Oul I o a'no _ yr z �P mym LW 200 ,`fl , Z I z0 zw wwN r ua „\\\\\QQ1'09;4z•z. Z -`.� .\\\\\\\�\\ jam - o rz a� ��i = 0 3 ? c�z moow o � r UaN ,rrrn W Or. Z 4J m �� 2o � ,N �:. U' QaPi a arum I's C d^` O W J po z p z 3 J �z w ,,- z �n strew �M ,n z S 0000 I-25 r\ Z .�,6£+.9e.,6L o�N z o� '" o �n a 'Ed z ww o ?�' 2 Fwwm I '<< w°z NW owa it � 0 �W!w , (1J w 7-00 N T - � o • j $li It st. z o a J N tl OOmwi \ r'L. M Za.`MV \� �_ Ji Z !- 00 O \\ n • ‘,3 dN N z _ w g�o� oa" �\\\SQP'2,6; 9"E, Q21.1 ON\\\\\\\\ qat ��(O oa � rl \\i iGpb R}unoo .> � '�' `^ caai'� N� ka Z V O an oo� S a�T I _ c- ao N x. vn iD 'z o.n w .axFf oz ZQi ,,� a Z uo^ `\z v' W WnOz `V I...: a no pN KVj4 za am �U i �� to . attto to rEd • I N N o I its S00'36'39"�/N '- _3 C1i 2521^ 223.70, in opm zp u MNno C .g ?) o H ^will WNoa� :71- 01 NOo 01O) o°d ioNO ao� ZO • zn _ _ _ _ J oc7m w� L \ - - \ F^o 00. Z / \ S a r .4"------------ , \ W 2ah I I \ m - O Q U p N \ ce_p ri O N Den I I \w `n a4� o � w oa 51 " am <,N\ Op ro M J UU UiOp\ o u_— Z MO oar g= _w\ Er _�" u OOi oz I zQ g0�\ ,-zpx '_� � N dz I az N\ 06 woam W Nof z ^ Uac I za I wa'flk 'n o o t" 5-o ,I.2'20i M„ Z,9Z.00N a N tno 10 7 Za•n a Z '. iV ��cn N oao oah $ E Cl oM_`' "c:'z a ai St 5'09a�, .;n du,� m \SA& 55-w oat m 4000 N \08 n^ N \HN0 Z N 72 -O 7j (. xa n O t m ei \a�,n w(5N n � 1 N 24\OaZo 0n n =ran Illirly Li i\ CC.< - - . I ZI m0 2 -z\ 0 OZ - �` I b Z . O O _ \ o dm W ii L 0 N ' W ^ _ \ n o �r N r , 0 3 " m 2'ori \ m o0 20 to �, m 'En ,- ,2 I I 2 0 i[i J o Nr CO m d Cr W w - - �� h 500'26'25"E 250.94 i8 r '0, o o I I I u z I I Ll rI 'n o oa 0 52 \ L J ) \ cn m NN\ z 2) I- �tnm w0 Nw \ WQJN WW ;m W F p 2 i F-u'l()r, CL N z� < z5` 6 _ \\ ≤ u_a 9 •SSZ M„£Z,9Z.QDN "'8 I 3o,a `o' 3aam CI M M C2 Il+ Ya,aO _:3 Y Z Z I i OO'OOOL "° I. JZ N re a0 Up 2. N JO 3aj0 6Qm O N mUa' Qw ¢U w 0W o- it J NI Z Ot�a 23pa' W w 21 p2 400¢ x= 41 3om of ON�ao a�aCJ �J o N x?. to,1K 3 Z fin o yL N O K \ m O OY _ —92SSmZ Wc,Yt,9 \ JaQ bison -00 a. p-N � wl M Om te? n m OU,bO M 1ix 0 \ W Z 1 ^ + i OUaN uN O6 �^ _ = E�M \- �'�w - • ...-_...J.,...�I�..__ �` z� L.nsn-Z _ w_ xN T} f N F, \\\\-\\\\_\_N"1\N l'l S9 M_,£Z 9 Z.00IJ.\ \\\N\\\\ \\N' \N\\\\\\\\\\\�BL'SL M �9 Z_0[_\\ _ _ ___ z m z L aVOb 1N 00 013M Z$b9Z n„L�3Z.b(4,,,\,( if o ci onw Tito I ZZ NOI103S 213121Vf10 1S3MH1210N 1111 1SEM 7 (1F2 N2 -0o ONI21V39 JO SISVB oN° mx I Wf�N ban N� ZO Jdi m N Z W Om\mw xO. 00 ^znor n N O 3 z.. a, ain,v tawl wu twos Ca 402002/•rp'2ae\N]T,o]oRe\a O hvho IF WOO„1000 In An•ADW,wM SCOL (MI XYd LOMBBowoOJ +oi 2l1lerc1 3NOHd 4 4 R 4-,SIS 1WS WunS S 0061 y � � db'W.1110d314l0VdWl 0 0 SK NlLW9nSltMld'ddV NOLLtls3NNY 901fMLI V f H331 V11131 W and 9LsmdONINO23a SK 91WWOo 3B NOLLCNIddtl NOLLVXdNNV BM1dYM: 2 u °a d6 H3 83W30 NMO1(Nil SVI' lN1BW9fIS NOILYJIIddY NOLLtl%3NNtl 9WtlW52 I 03,OVEN:yol,Wd AB NOSflOS3O 31V0 %NVW 311 0Y321 xanno3 YNIO � IJ� qW SC1d1 ' I .. <SZQ�i llM p $�^^^,{2^ Cf�G�F �$TG5 OLLI9m S _yGy��SA��$9$N}�Vi!biU Y M [-§illtil-51 di I <r� o Y r. Id R! to = S I P -8M ce g 8 qI N o 2 I % @ a ; 1I ' b e 3 E u- a ul Q4m g dii .I aoZa rG m r r �' i3` $ 5«i^ �Rm �8 s 2 a^ 888Fa ^3a_am. 9go 52 3o a ^�'§ _ N 0O IA o i tl 2 a� §9$5 iii Igg r~° a s LIA z _ w — il 811 Irti°11" 611:iF^ M ..12 ';'10"Il W \rX ' ) I ' --, �NN � \ O o \N. \ ��/ p i „ II � _ I \ , go yJ� / / kit r J Y 1 1 ! yC \ O I ! \, Ll !I 1111 �' ��. 1111rir 1 0 \ r't �.. 2 • 11 r I I o k\\') Y,..7dl II I I 11 Z \� 1 �� III � w v � ti� �vA� / - kl I 0- _ `��re ,� / d hl f 11 6111 j x II I I _ i `/ f/,� cam-- —C -;c, ;I i It' D 1^ - II/ I ^ / //AC # `� I'�/ \I I, ,—t,.:r--._ _fir- — i , a \\ n \�1 I x r 1 W iii r II 1 r)p I I I « .� \�v J\ h lrr ' I. �_� Ili ¢ 1 (1 x I J I I nl e 0 ki 4 I. I. �'U 3` O 2 1 Y \I W 6 � I L' � � U �1� YET{, 2 IAA i ;< ll I i zp2- I ' I I {V' Q� +% �1 0 LP ri 1 1 ('' a o� o 'Y ?fa, 11 — ---11- g a z i I I I II g ag^ Iii f II 1 °1 a s xLUCI !sill) i - 0 I Lu I � ''d _ II d -II a D I I ao Paz 41A. °Ifi. sr I s I a X _ � 4 0 Qd M I ti n ' I y I g6 r L I y Y%t-'�- -�� f 6 r III I I a ° xFffi^ c, z III / 1 II I ill I / II1 n I V n I``r lj£ I Y. I II'III^ 71.� �- } \ \�. o .. - - —3N-1"tlM XI3dSON0�.9L1 LL 1�5a I ! II• 1� <-t - � .— 3N431d SD i;'N0 • --se . .IMO -/i° l 3N1'M31tlM dSONOI / (— pA NY3d /'/ 1 ` ._.aA}3@Nad 013LL—.-.-_� _d pl �'/ / ll r o O I "� CC' �� II i1 II 11 I _ I S I W I LL I W I J I W I m I < a.minANONn<ISI Sr 3611 die dWl:L1OAY1 BMA 1Lod3L 10VW0101•XIJMMISOYTC dP<InOPo-1909i EI:d:oNIMWa wdw 12'91 NM 2•13<xl TETRA TECH 0 July 17, 2008 Town Manager 441 Third Street P.O Box 626 Mead, CO 80542 RE: Equinox Annexation and Rezoning PA's 1-6 PUD (formerly submitted as Mead Town Center) Annexation Impact Report Tetra Tech Job No. 133-2606408001 Dear Town Manager: Equinox Annexation and Rezoning PA's 1-6 PUD subdivision is requesting annexation into the Town of Mead, proposing a residential and commercial/mixed-use development. The area is located north of State Highway (SH) 66 and west of Weld Country Road (WCR) 7. The proposed subdivision is approximately 110 acres. In preparation for the • annexation process, this report analyzes the proposed development's impact with respect to the Town of Mead's and St. Vrain Valley School District's services. This report addresses the Town's review comments, dated April 17 and June 30, 2008, for the previous submittals of the annexation and rezoning application for Equinox PA's 1-6 PUD dated March 25, 2008. If you have any questions or comments concerning this report, please feel free to contact us at 303-772-5282. Sincerely, TETRA TECH I Cameron Fowlkes, P.E. Project Manager Attachments • P.\133_26064_08001 Mead Place\Deliverables\Annexation\Annexation Impact Report.doc 1900 S Sunset Street Suite I-F Longmont,CO 80501 Tel 303772.5282 Fax 302 7727039 www,tetratech.com General Site Location and Description • The annexation portion of the Equinox Annexation and Rezoning PA's 1-6 PUD is located in the southwest quarter of section 22, Township 3, Range 68 West of the 6th Principal Meridian, Town of Mead, County of Weld, State of Colorado. More specifically, the site is bounded by Weld County Road 7 to the west, associated land that is being rezoned and included as part of the Equinox Rezoning PA's 1-6 PUD application and State Highway 66 to the south, existing agricultural vacant land and I-25 to the east and Mulligan Lake and existing large lot residential to the north. Strategically located at a newly realigned interchange of Highway 66 and I-25, this project will act as a source of energy to the up and coming activity center of Mead. The proposed PUD (PA's 1-6) includes 113.1 acres of residential and mixed use development with a maximum of 1,143 single-family detached and attached residential units and 568,617 s.f. of commercial, office, civic, and retail space. Plans for Extension of Municipal Services Water At this time, the Equinox annexation and rezoning project is located within the service district of the Longs Peak Water District (LPWD). The LPWD is scheduled to install a transmission line from north to south through the Mead Place development adjacent to • the Highland Ditch. The applicant is coordinating with the LPWD to make a connection into the new transmission line. It is the applicant's intent to pursue the use of a secondary non-potable irrigation system within the development. This system may be contained on site, or may be part of the non-potable irrigation system that will be pursued through the Longs Peak Water District or the Highland Ditch Co. Sanitary Sewer Currently, the Equinox annexation and rezoning development is within the Town of Mead Sanitation District boundary. Two parcels within the project boundary are also included in an IGA boundary with Saint Vrain Sanitation District (SVSD). The applicant is presently petitioning to get the entire project site included in the Saint Vrain Sanitation District's 208 service boundary. The applicant is requesting the Town's support and assistance in this petition. Servicing the proposed development through SVSD will allow the sanitary sewer to be a gravity system as opposed to a pumped and force main system if the proposed property were served through the Town of Mead Sanitation District. The applicant has contacted the SVSD Engineering Manager to confirm the capacity of the district's `North Line' which will service the project. Currently, the `North Line' is built through the Mead • Crossing development and terminates on the south side of SH 66 just east of the subject properties. Off-site improvements will need to be constructed in order to make a • connection to the existing sanitary sewer system. Natural Gas Natural gas will be provided by Xcel Energy. The applicant has met with Nicci McManigal of Xcel Energy and confirmed that the subject property will be served by Xcel Energy. Xcel Energy has existing gas service lines in the State Highway 66 and Weld County Road 7 corridors as well as a gas regulator station north of the project site near the Town of Mead. Electric Electric service will be provided by United Power. The applicant has contacted Monica Hanson with United Power and a"will serve" letter is attached. Telephone Qwest will be the communications service provider. The applicant is currently in contact with Barton Garner of Qwest. The Equinox annexation and rezoning project will be served from existing infrastructure near the Town of Mead. A "will serve" letter is attached. • Streets The PUD plan proposes one full service, one three-quarter turn and one right-in/right-out access point along State Highway 66 and two full service access points on Weld County Road 7. The more southern of the two access points on Weld County Road 7 is envisioned as a roundabout that will serve the Equinox Annexation and Rezoning PA's 1- 6 PUD and Mead Place to the west. The roundabout is intended to promote safer speeds within the community and to reduce turning movement and wait times at the Weld County Road 7 and State Highway 66 intersection. The roundabout will direct the majority of traffic on Weld County Road 7 into the Mead Place and the Equinox Annexation and Rezoning PA's 1-6 PUD developments. The northern entrance is intended primarily as a residential entrance to accommodate the remaining residential traffic associated with this project traveling north on Weld County Road 7. Thus, the character and amount of traffic on Weld County Road 7 north of this site is intended to remain similar to today's standard. Preliminary discussions of the plan with the Colorado Department of Transportation and the Town of Mead staff have been very positive with the understanding that improvements along State Highway 66 and Weld County Road 7 will be necessary to serve the development. Mead Development Group has also begun discussions with CDOT about obtaining access permits for State Highway 66 and is aware of the permit application process. A copy of the Traffic Impact Analysis from LSC Transportation • Consultants, Inc. is included in this submittal package for your review. Law Enforcement• The proposed development is currently under the protection of the Weld County Sheriff's Department. Law enforcement will be provided by the Town of Mead through its contract with the Weld County Sheriff's Department. Fire The proposed development is within the Mountain View Fire Protection District. The applicant has contacted the Fire Marshal and Fire Chief about service to this property. There is a possibility that a portion of land may need to be donated for fire protection use. The Fire District will follow up on this topic during the referral process after the initial annexation application submittal. Existing School District and Special Districts The site is located within the following school and special districts: Longs Peak Water District Longmont Soil Conservation District Northern Colorado Water Conservancy District St. Vrain & Left Hand Water Conservation District St. Vrain Valley School District • Weld Library District Local Public School Impact The proposed development will generate approximately 444 students. This is based on a student yield of 0.430 for single-family detached units and 0.37 students for single-family attached units. The yield is itemized as follows (185 single-family detached units and 958 single-family attached units): Number of Yield Rate* Projected Student Student Facility Percent of Units Yield Standard Standard Capacity SFD SPA SFD SFA SFD SFA Total Elementary 185 958 0.22 0.20 40.1 191.6 231.7 525 students 44.1% Middle School 185 958 0.10 0.09 18.5 86.2 104.7 750 students 14.0% High School 185 958 0.11 0.09 20.9 86.2 107.1 1200 students 8.9% Total 0.43 0.37 80 364 444 * Student Yield Rates based on criteria provided by Saint Vrain Valley School District dated April 2008. • ' • 232 elementary students or 44.1% of the standard capacity of a 525-student • elementary school. • 105 middle school students or 14.0% of the standard capacity of a 750-student middle school. • 107 high school students or 8.9% of the standard capacity of a 1200-student high school. • P:\133_26064_08001 Mead Place\Deliverables\Annexation\Annexation Impact Report.doc • NITED • POWER Your Touchstone Energy'Partner April 1, 2008 Mr. Josh Sherman,E.I.T. Tetra Tech 1900 South Sunset Street, Suite 1-F Longmont, CO 80501 Dear Mr. Sherman: United Power is the provider of electric service in the area to the proposed Mead Place -Town • Center project located at the NE intersection of CR 7 and HWY 66. The electrical distribution in the area may need to be upgraded depending on the requirements of the site and in providing capacity and safe reliable power to the area. Service will be provided according to the rules,regulations, and policies in effect by United Power at the time service is requested. We look forward to this opportunity to provide electric service. If you have any questions, please give me a call at 303-637-1336. Since ly, MS{ Monica L. Hansen District Representative UNITED POWER,INC. PO BOX 929 • Brighton.CO 80601 303-659-0551 • 800-468-8809 • fax 303-659-2172 www.unitednower.com FROM (M0M)MAR a apace a:al'Sr. a:awn..7600000052 0 2 �• 3f3/2008aiV Qwest Bart Gamer Qwest. Field Engineer Spirit of Service RE:MEAD TOWN CENTER Tetra Teck Josh Sherman This is a will serve letter for Mead Town Center_ Qwest will provide service for the Mead Town Center .This is planned to be annexed by the town of Mead. Qwest requests plans to be submitted to allow Time for engineering and construction to take place on a reasonable schedule. Fart Garner Field Engineer Qwest Communications 303 255 6122 DRAFT Equinox Annexation and Rezoning (PA's 1 -6) PUD • July 16, 2008 PUD Development Plan Regulations General Provisions Authority This PUD Development Plan is authorized by Section 16-3-40, 16-4-80 and 16-4-90 of the Town of Mead Land Use Code. Applicability The provisions of this PUD Development Plan shall run with the land. The landowners, their successors, heirs, or assigns shall be bound by this Development Plan, as amended and approved by the Town Manager or Town Board of Trustees. Adoption The adoption of this PUD Development Plan shall evidence the findings and decision of the Town of Mead Board of Trustees that this Development Plan for the Equinox Annexation and Rezoning PA's 1-6 PUD is in general conformity with the Town of Mead Area Comprehensive Plan; is authorized by the provisions of Section 16-4-80 and 16-4-90 of the Town of Mead Land Use Code. Relationship to Town Regulations The provisions of this PUD Development Plan shall prevail and govern the development the Equinox Annexation and Rezoning PA's 1-6 PUD, provided however, that where the provisions of this PUD Development Plan do not address a particular subject, the relevant provisions of the Town of Mead Land Use Code, as amended, or any other applicable ordinance or regulations of the Town of Mead, shall be • applicable. Enforcement To further the mutual interest of the residents, occupants, and owners of the Development and of the public in the preservation of the integrity of this PUD Development Plan, the provisions of this Development Plan relating to the use of land and the location of common open space shall run in favor of the Town of Mead and shall be enforceable at law or in equity by the Town without limitation on any power or regulation. Conflict Where there is more than one provision within this PUD Development Plan that covers the same subject matter, the provision which is most restrictive or composes higher standards or requirements shall govern unless determined otherwise by the Town. Maximum Level of Development The total number of dwellings (density) or the total commercial, business, or industrial (sq. footage) approved for development within the Planning Areas are the maximum development requested for platting or construction (plus approved density transfers, if any). The actual number of dwellings or level of development for commercial, business, or industrial properties may be less due to subdivision or site improvement plan requirements or other requirements of the Town Board of Trustees. Project Tracking At the time of subdivision final plat for any portion of the development, the applicant shall provide a summary of the development to date, along with the new final plat submission to ensure maximum development limits are not exceeded. • July 16, 2008 1 DRAFT Statement of Commitments • The statement of commitments shall, in all cases, describe the development commitments including a method for assigning responsibility to heirs, successors, or assigns, and timing of the fulfillment of these commitments for the following: A. Dedication. A description of dedications for public use, either in specific acreage dedication (referenced by number, letter, or symbol)or specific amounts of cash-in-lieu of land or facilities. Describe the proposed ownership, utility provision, improvement schedule, and maintenance provisions for land dedicated.Any provision for on-demand dedication for right-of-way easements, parks, trails, and school sites should be stated. Title insurance shall be provided by the applicant for land dedicated to the Town. In all cases, dedicated land shall be conveyed to the Town by Warranty Deed and the Town may further convey the land to the appropriate agency, unless otherwise specified by the Board of Trustees. A minimum of 20% of the project area (22.6 acres)will be dedicated as either open space, trails, parks, or civic gathering areas. More detailed information as to the specific locations and size allocations of the dedications are not available at this time. B. On or off-site improvements. Provision shall be made for the construction of community on or off-site improvements through irrevocable letters of credit for the imposition of pro rata fees for the following: This information can be provided at more detailed design phases in the future. 1. Wildlife Preservation Plan 2. Wetlands/Riparian Preservation Plan 3. Project Phasing • 4. Fire Protection—see the Development Impact Assessment Statements in Tab 20. 5. School Sites—see Tab 19. 6. Payment of Taxes on Land to be Dedicated for Public Use 7. Other Commitments Imposed by the Board of Trustees— No commitments have been imposed by the Board of Trustees at this time. Overall PUD Intent These PUD Development Standards serve to regulate land use within the Equinox Annexation and Rezoning PA's 1-6 PUD. These Regulations are enforceable within the Equinox Annexation and Rezoning PA's 1-6 PUD and take precedent over the Town of Mead Zoning Regulations and Land Use Code where applicable. Definitions Building Group—Within the Single-Family Detached category, a building group is a single detached dwelling unit. Within the Mixed Use category, a building group is the building footprint created by a set of attached units or stores. Building Cluster-A home, or group of homes, that is accessed off of, or grouped around, a common interior access easement. PUD Net Developable Area—The remaining acreage of the overall development site after publicly dedicated Right-of-Way is excluded. Net Planning Area Development Area -The remaining platted acreage of a Planning Area, or portion thereof, after publicly dedicated Right-of-Ways and oil/gas well setbacks are excluded that creates the Planning Area boundary. • On—Street Parking— Pull-in (90 degree or angled) parking or parallel parking on the side of a street. July 16, 2008 2 DRAFT Parking Court— An off-street parking area that is used exclusively for and contains parking stalls which • are accessed by a single drive aisle. Parking Lot—An off-street parking area that is used exclusively for and contains parking stalls which can be accessed by more than one drive aisle. Planning Area—A Planning Area(PA)delineates a land area boundary with a specific land use and like density. The Planning Area may have a unique set of dimensional and density standards. Density Regulations The total number of residential dwelling units within the Equinox Annexation and Rezoning PA's 1-6 PUD is limited to 1,143 units, and may be any combination of Single-Family Detached or Attached. The maximum amount of mixed use retail/office use is .25 FAR within a given planning area or 568,617s.f. for the overall development. Dwelling units and non-residential square footage may be transferred from Planning Area to Planning Area as long as the transfer does not result in a change of the number of units or the Net Planning Area Development Area by more than 10% of the maximum allowable amounts for any Planning Area on the PUD Land Use Plan (Exhibit B). Transfers of more than 10% require Board of Trustees approval. Mixed use, such as retail/office, is not allowed in PA-1. PA-6 does not allow residential or non-residential structures. General 1. No obstructions taller than 24", including buildings, will be allowed within the corner sight triangles. 2. Oil and gas well and production facility setbacks to lot lines are a minimum of 150'; to occupied buildings are a minimum of 200'; to a building intended as a place of assembly, institution, or school is 350'; to streets is 75'. 3. A surface use agreement, whether a detailed agreement between parties or based upon State Senate Bill 237, pertaining to the on-site oil/gas wells shall be in place before the Board of Trustee's final action on the preliminary plat. • Open Space Dedicated open space or park land may be designated for either the Town or the Homeowner's Association. Open space areas can include, but are not limited to, parks, trails, ponds, landscape buffers, civic gathering areas and common areas, all subject to final Board of Trustee's approval. A minimum of 20% of the overall project area (22.6 acres) shall be dedicated as open space or park land and can occur in any Planning Area. Open Space areas shall be a minimum of 30' in width. The width of open space areas may be reduced from 30'for short distances to accommodate topography, connectivity and other design constraints based on administrative approval. The following shall not count towards open space: • Private lots or yards on fee-simple lots • Public or private street rights-of-ways • The 150' radius setback area surrounding Oil and Gas wells and/or Oil and Gas well production facilities. • Parking areas and driveways • Designated outdoor storage areas • Detention areas • Actual flow channel areas Residential - Single Family Detached Intent To provide development standards for single-family residential lots in PA- 1. • July 16, 2008 3 DRAFT Minimum Lot Size Development Standards • PA— 1 =the minimum lot size is limited to 4,500 s.f. Lots adjacent to existing homes along the northern perimeter boundary shall be a minimum of 10,000 s.f. Encroachments and Projections Eaves and window wells may encroach into the side, rear and front yard setbacks up to 2'. Parking Standards Parking may occur within any of the following: free standing garages and carports, garages within residential buildings, and tandem parking, or on —street parking (pull-in or parallel). Parking lots are not permitted except for parks and open space area parking requirements. Long, monotonous drive lanes flanked with on-street parking or large, undivided parking lots are not permitted within residential areas. When parking within residential structures is not used, parallel parking along local drives and dispersed parking courts are the desired alternatives. Parking courts should be concealed from neighborhood streets and entry drives with screening whenever feasible. Unless existing adjacent uses are considered incompatible, the extent of parking on perimeter drives should be minimized. On-street parking is allowed if is mostly configured as parallel parking. Housing Model Diversity A mix of housing models shall be included based on the size of the project area. In order to promote such variety, the following minimum standards shall be met: • A minimum of two (2) housing collections shall be required for every forty-five (45)acres or more, including such plans that are part of a phased overall development. • Required differentiation in models may be defined by significant variation as demonstrated by the following components: • Floor plan configuration. Massing. Garage configuration. Garage orientation Size. Program. Color scheme. Exterior materials. • No more than one repetition of a floorplan or model with the same elevation style shall be planned within 3 lots on the same block face. • Identical models, including those with different color schemes and/or different exterior materials, shall not be placed adjacent to each other or directly across any street from one another. • Models are encouraged to have a mix of 1-story, 1%-story and two story configurations. • Models are encouraged to have a mix of garage loading configurations, such as: detached, semi-detached and attached garages in front and side loaded. • Variation in garage forward versus house forward elevations is encouraged. Side loaded garages are considered a house forward elevation. • These requirements are in addition to requirements for Stylistic Diversity contained herein. Stylistic Diversity The following minimum standards shall be met: • A minimum of three (3)distinct models per housing collection will be required. Each model will be required to have at least three (3) architectural styles and color schemes which may be selected to promote architectural diversity and allow latitude for homebuyer • preferences. July 16, 2008 4 DRAFT • Refer to the Architectural Patterns section of the Residential Development Regulations • for information on acceptable styles that may be derived for each model. Mixed Use Intent To provide standards for a variety of compatible uses, including, but not limited to residential, neighborhood retail and commercial, regional commercial, office, community recreation, places of worship, and civic facilities. Residential over retail or office, and office over retail are permitted uses in PA's 2-6. Single-Family Detached and Attached residential uses are allowed in PA's 2- 6. Purpose The Mixed Use (MU) District is intended to provide for well designed, attractive, and innovative buildings housing certain compatible retail, business, office, residential and institutional uses for a large tract of land that gives reasonable flexibility needed for development over a period of time to both the developer and to the municipality, but excludes uses that are too intensive, are purely or essentially manufacturing in nature, or are more suitable for typical industrial parks. Permitted retail uses may be combined in one building or on one lot. Permitted retail uses may include other retail stores not specifically listed herein, which are determined to be compatible with and similar to permitted uses by the Zoning Administrator. Permitted uses 1. Residential - Single Family Detached 2. Residential - Single Family Attached • 3. Antique shops and associated repair and restoration activities incidental to such retail trade, but specifically excluding rummage and similar second-hand, resale, surplus, and consignment shops,flea markets, and similar operations; 4. Art galleries, studios, and art supply stores; 5. Automotive uses as follows (subject, however, to conditional use permits for certain functions): (a) Automobile accessories and parts retail stores; (b) Automobile rental facilities when part of another permitted or conditional use such as, but not limited to, a hotel; (c) Automobile retail service stations ('gas stations) and car washes, including sales of convenience foods and goods incidental to the retail sale of automotive fuel: 6. Indoor banquet facilities; 7. Bowling alleys; 8. Catalogue sales stores; 9. Catering facilities, if incidental to restaurants or banquet facilities; 10. Clothing, dry goods, and shoe stores; 11. Crafts and picture framing stores, retail only; 12. Department stores smaller than 25,000 square feet; 13. Dining, open-air; 14. Drive-in, drive-up, or drive-through service as part of any permitted or conditional use; 15. Drug stores and pharmacies; 16. Furniture, home furnishings, and floor covering stores; 17. Grocery or fruit and vegetable stores; 18. Hardware, home improvement, and home decorating stores; 19. Home appliance sales and service stores, conducted as one integrated operation; 20. Interior decorating shops, with furniture repair and refinishing only if incidental to retail sales; 21. Jewelry and watch sales and repair shops; 22. Liquor retail sales stores, but only carry-out packaged goods; • 23. Mailing and packaging service shops, retail only; 24. Meat, seafood, or poultry markets, if no slaughter or stripping is involved July 16, 2008 5 • DRAFT 25. Office equipment and computer sales and repair; • 26. Office supply stores; 27. Parks and open space, including outdoor plazas; 28. Pet shops or animal care clinics, excluding extended stay boarding services, when conducted wholly within an enclosed building; mix. 29. Post offices; 30. Quick-printing and copying shops; 31. Rental service stores; 32. Restaurants, fast-food or tablecloth sit-down, and outdoor patio types; 33. Restaurants with sales of alcoholic beverages for consumption on the premises, if incidental to the serving of food and subject to the issuance of a liquor license in accordance with the provisions of the Mead Municipal Code; 34. Restaurants including indoor dancing or live entertainment, excluding adult use oriented entertainment; 35. Sporting goods, hobby, and toy stores; 36. Theatres, indoor motion picture; 37. Video and electronic media rental and sales stores; 38. Yard and garden equipment retail sales with service facilities that are secondary to the permitted or conditional use, conducted as one integrated operation and wholly within a completely enclosed building, except for outside storage and display areas; 39. Any public building, structure, or facility erected or leased by any municipality, county, state, or federal government, or branch, department, or agency thereof, other than office uses as permitted in this district, excluding correctional facilities; 40. Business offices, such as corporate headquarters, district, branch, sales, telemarketing, advertising, computer facility, payment processing, and similar business offices in which goods, wares, or merchandise are not commercially created, displayed, stored, exchanged, or sold on the premises; 41. College, business, or trade schools and personnel training centers (public or private) • 42. Drive-in, drive-up, or drive-through facilities associated with any permitted or conditional use; 43. Professional offices, such as medical and dental offices and clinics, legal, insurance, real estate, accounting, and other similar professional offices; 44. Financial offices and institutions, such as commercial banks, savings and loans, stock or commodities brokers, commercial and real estate financing offices, credit unions, real estate title, mortgage figs, and other similar financial services offices, but not including drive-through facilities; 45. Offices of non-profit organizations, such as professional organizations, civic, social, and fraternal associations, political organizations, and similar entities, but not Houses of Worship; 46. Hotels and motels, including dining and meeting rooms, restaurants, lounges, and related accessory uses; 47. Public or private clubs, athletic, and recreational facilities, including health clubs, gymnasiums, and indoor sports facilities; 48. Dance studios, yoga studios, multipurpose performance spaces 49. Live-work spaces, retail, office, and residential 50. Salesrooms for display of sample products only and offices that are incidental to the permitted uses in this Section; 51. Services or commercial uses intended primarily to serve the immediate convenience needs of persons employed in the area, including stationery and office supply stores, mailing services, restaurants, dry cleaners, excluding large scale dry cleaning plants, and similar uses; 52. Accessory buildings, accessory structures, and accessory uses to the permitted principal uses in this Section as provided for in the Mead Zoning Code; 53. Off-street parking and loading facilities as required or permitted by the Mead Zoning Code; Conditional Uses. 1. Department stores larger than 25,000 square feet. 2. Hotels and motels, including dining and meeting rooms, restaurants, lounges, and related • accessory uses; 3. Houses of Worship and associated day schools, limited to a 10-acre maximum site; July 16, 2008 6 DRAFT 4. Landscaping and gardening centers for retail sale of plants, flowers, trees, seeds, and related • landscaping materials, and nurseries operated in conjunction therewith; 5. Nursing homes, convalescent and assisted care homes, hospices, and other similar specialized care facilities; 6. Outdoor sales, storage, and display in conjunction with any permitted or conditional use; 7. Retail sales accessory to the permitted principal uses that are limited to 10% or less of the total square footage; Prohibited Uses. 1. Industrial Uses Residential - Single Family Attached Uses General Single Family Attached products may include building groups and clusters with maximum Planning Area densities of 12.0 du/ac in PA-2 and 20 du/ac in PA's 3-5. Clustered homes may be detached or attached products. Units may be developed on fee-simple lots or with the area between buildings groups designated as common area. Parking Standards Required parking spaces may be attached, detached, or clustered in a common parking area. A ratio of .5 spaces per unit shall be provided as guest parking. Parking may occur on any of the following: on—street parking (pull-in or parallel), parking courts, small parking lots,free standing garages and carports, garages within residential buildings, and tandem parking. Projects with long, monotonous drive lanes flanked with on-street parking or large, undivided parking lots are not permitted. When parking within residential structures is not used, dispersed parking • courts and parallel parking along local drives are the desired alternatives. Parking courts, or small parking lots, should be concealed from neighborhood streets and entry drives by placing them to the rear of buildings whenever feasible. Unless existing adjacent uses are considered incompatible, the extent of parking on perimeter drives should be minimized. On-street parking is allowed if is mostly configured as parallel parking. General Neighborhood Commercial, Regional Commercial, Retail, Office and Civic Uses Parking Standards Parking may occur on any of the following: on—street parking (pull-in or parallel), parking courts, or parking lots. Parking courts and parking lots, should be screened from perimeter neighborhood streets and entry drives with berming and landscape material, where possible. Street Standards Maximum cul-de-sac length = 600' Minimum horizontal radius (centerline) on a local street = 100' Street classifications and cross sections Exhibit C • July 16, 2008 7 DRAFT Dimensional Standards • ^ bra f.x - ,i, .'_ s 3 r# 1, g `. Pi;. Building Setback from 40' 50' N/A 50' N/A N/A WCR7 Parking Setback from 20' 20' N/A 20' N/A N/A WCR7 Building Setback from N/A N/A N/A 50' 50' N/A State Highway 66 Parking Setback from N/A N/A N/A 50' 50' N/A State Highway 66 Oil &Gas Well/Production Facility 150' 150' 150' 150' 150' 150' Setbacks to Lot Lines • Well/Production eIllProduction Facility 200' 200' 200' 200' 200' 200' Setbacks to Occupied Buildings Oil & Gas Well/Production Facility Setbacks to Buildings of 350' 350' 350' 350' 350' 350' Assembly, Institutions or Schools Oil &Gas Well/Production Facility 75' 75' 75' 75' 75' 75' Setbacks to Streets Residential ��. Minimum Lot Size (s.f.) 4,500 s.f. 1,500 s.f. 1,500 s.f. 1,500 s.f. 1,500 s.f. N/A Minimum Lot Size on 10,000 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Northern Boundary s.f. Minimum Lot Width at 45' 20' 20' 20' 20' N/A Setback Line(feet) Minimum Lot Width at 30' 20' 20' 20' 20' N/A Property Line (feet) Minimum Building N/A 1,000 s.f. 1,000 s.f. 1,000 s.f. 1,000 s.f. N/A Footprint(s.f.) • Maximum Building 35' 35' 45' 45' 45' N/A Height July 16, 2008 8 DRAFT `.'. ; r,,,,t4 `,, � .., ,fit .le,ii�qygydbd� l ` , Setbacks -, ,,is..,-,,,4,..,..,e,,,,;", f'- : .� 3. �:_. '6 .;f,<4_,4��,t. • Front Building from Property Line/ R.O.W. /Interior 15' 10' 10' 10' 10' N/A Access Easement Garage Door from Right- of-Way/ Interior Access 20' 20' 20' 20' 20' N/A Easement Rear Front Load Products Building from Property 15' 10' 10' 10' 10' N/A Line • Rear Load Products To Building from Lot Line/ 0' 0' 0' 0' 0' N/A Alley Access Easement To Building from Alley 4' 4' 4' 4' 4' N/A Pavement Edge Side Attached Units N/A 0' 0' 0' 0' N/A Detached Units 5' 5'/0' 5'/0' 5'/0' 5'/0' N/A • Corner Yard 10' 10' 10' 10' 10' N/A Building Separation between Building 10' 20' 20' 20' 20' N/A Groups2 Separation between 30' 20' 20' 20' 20' N/A Building Clusters Building Setback from 20' 20' 20' 20' 20' N/A Collector Parking Setback from 15' 15' 15' 15' 15' N/A Collector Building Setback to Interior Access 15' 10' 10' 10' 10' N/A Easement Building Separation to Detached Garage or 10' 10' 10' 10' 10' N/A Carport Structure Minimum Off-street Parking Spaces per 2 2 2 2 2 N/A dwelling unit Mixed Use 0," 20' IIIBuilding Setback from Collector N/A 20' 20' 20' N/A July 16, 2008 9 DRAFT Parking Setback from N/A 15' 15' 15' 15' N/A • Collector Building Setback from Commercial Local (with N/A 10' 10' 10' 10' N/A and without Parking) Off-Street Parking Setback from N/A 15' 15' 15' 15' N/A Commercial Local (with and without Parking) Building Setback to Interior Access N/A 10' 10' 10' 10' N/A Easement Parking Setback to Interior Access N/A 0' 0' 0' 0' N/A Easement Building Separation N/A 15' 10' 10' 10' N/A from Parking Maximum Building N/A 45' 55' 55' 55' N/A Height 1 —Flag lots are permitted with a minimum 30'width at the property line. • 2—The more restrictive standard applies. • July 16, 2008 10 O s z o ° CL Na g ,sXO ~ ZC° c F z E F 4 ° - o ° DZ ° (nu m N _ u o Q w a°z w ° Z w Q w ° fr o h o o = - W Q d U 96 o oa _ Q ° - m M ° i ° ° a °� ° w °I ° < m g a o ° N > s u°5 9 = m x ° o ! w _ g i < O F ¢ S o n t y F F ry = i C LL F a O O = :i 5 s 3 i 8 3 w 8 �_ g i RE a - C w - - 3 F - - 3 a- - - ; z - W 'm' z F g a a = o C a- ti j o ~i gF [~ a : � 5 o i o O u 0 0 O rc p w _ ,I s p a -- = os o a 3 3 a 9 3 g 9 a z U 8 U w o 0 0 a- ° g r o LL g ° u o 2 LL F a g ° a ' a- o o p Zyu r 1- y ¢ s !' 8 . w w m s . w e m o 22 s if w € .a . 9 < ui- pa a 9 Q w tat, LL 0 0 0 OOOC a n ry N M • m 9 z F 9 o - x . aok wwn� � z 8z w - ,5 owp-; r • w ° w ��//'�� ° o w Q o m w Qo w a- °w o 8 Z =O0) VJ - 0 u0 '� o g � W W g W( g i o g s o g o 0w 9 o w > O M E Q w ry m n N r w SOOF- /^'� < y s ° N f a N g < f • N U LL q t CL ry F N F w 2 F N 4 /� - a _ F - g 9 - g V F ~ I ~ 0 0 a z a a 0 ° ° o gz Qo o^^ _ 0 _ o o ° o wu o o - o ° LL a o ° 5 LL 5 HN ow _ w o = z 2 ° 1— '4" 5 2 o o 0 z o Isla' u- w W W 9 a- �� a 2 � OQ = O a a- waa d LL Z r— CO O COQW W w rot O � OCO ° ' < = gee ow - € ° 0 rl • O I— . E: o oaaa-2 _ n y LE 22 a aago 'orN � ¶ ° o �� Z EE Z ° ogo ° E6 -w gb2 < ° m 02 2i 22 o wt2o ors ° �<. ° 3g Sco 0iaF88 8 ! xgt ° 9 i22 w 02 2k i 90 ` ° Na . aaa- _ m < X O � . � i o io ¢ gz ° z z 009 : o oa3om9 9 26 42 . 2 % ° rcm pm t o w W U ? ma wNmaF o � mgaz N x o = z oo m grci o ' 000m _f om � ! G � - a- a- ° 3 a ° i Z ono os $ rc ° w afaa Copo o s ° ° o r o rc 2 ti ° ; G o w F F o o' ° F a -° 'E f o s F 0 ' .. ° ° o ° J o ° 3 0 � � ° ° � F R w 3 - z ° - z '122 - o g x g o6 H ° ° S rc s g i z g X i t ig2w > � . a : o g z o ' atg . - a rc V o r < o ! g ° o w a ₹ o o n o 9 9 2 a i o `o ° 6 ; w o . o O0 F ° . _ 6 V o ; , 5A o W - ° ° z x ° ° o o a o Z Q g m 3 n3 ° 3 ° � oT _ U' L g a �' ¢ T2 = 22R2$ o C7 ° ur : a- g 8LL o a 5 a 'uw ° 9 g ow Z 9 z ° ° a a m J ° m 3 . LL ° ° - o ° - o b w ° o 0 5 o O g ; F0 F r O F r �n a e W00 8 9 9 8 9 8 8 9 8 . a m ° m ° a i g s w u . a m 3 . a a- gel w 0 0 o O o - 5 oo 8a- 8 0 3 9 0 ° a. a- w o 8 'om �3JI is 50 ° ° . ' hm a5Wz o o° 5 = taw 1 2 g e o � i wg z w G ` v o a- ~ m ;' o 2 c= _ _ g,I< 9 I � a 2 a- 5262 _ & ; CL 0, 26 ew6yEE u Cy �' o f 9E =I a o 'z' s 5 .. ; 8 F' s ay _ § Z a E0 § IN °z ' i � _ i� s ° ° g td t W g F E ° .ss I w s Z a ° e rc K = o O as r � tit 2 ZLiu A I l`—� Mpg o a w ° ° € ° o 2622 UJ S V 3 _i : f E a W _ $ S E u4 S E u`1 ug ut T 2 t f ug O L3CMNTYg 7 U o &B asSVggggc, c 11 0 q z F2 020022 2Ett2tttttttt9ttg tt2g91223 ° 2t29 w o 09 O020 29s : 000 , 99 - 92902\ }, Q U c Z o g ° c o' o o 555555 ° ° ° 3 z a 3A .DE _ g 1 ' 8 O ° e 5 _ g zwn ° ao ° ja LOIINI*AD5 `� �_t g H a O F p !!II! F _ _ Z Ns�$9 P �� i 8 sF o 0 ° ° ° - ' ! - - E 1- 1- - oa Sg 3O`2- ° Z fp' P I 5 3 ZS F l F ~ E ° F $ o m o o z o o o o r_0 . 5 �_°� ±LL '> O55 as ° °mosao ° mm o 06 z T ES"� z 0a i o o o f N i g m Z ❑ E a m CLL dF X Q Z cD C 0 0 a° a' 2 a z Li m onr: , ii13o 0 5 EL_ omo Q IA N Cn u x w ° ¢ og p < Zb00 . Foie 2 o ` w (7Z W Qu o E° pi - ww ° " ° w - oo o s o o WQ0' di F U ¢ F V f zd o f/I F 2 Q •S z 4 O '4' 95 2 - E o g U V S a s Y O Z r N ° ° `w L.62 O U f F 4445944 °ti ; a .ri a 0 5 ¢ a u m g z £ ill n q$n I -" a a N a% ¢ oa u Z .; o o w Eo ` w g ,-nd w rz y oz R X°I o z Z 1 i5 L goi 5o a r 0 ' o ≤ ° x i0 a ow kw('- oaso ,; ° w i ' w 1- V io aY W Nu „ E : ¢ Jz �z 8 a`� 2t , . a ozoa °aw � o °a so o ' oU i ° ° ra fN z ¢z a z v U s " " `u " - ° z o a - F < - ' EN o i L O a W ¢ w o z x s - W 8g= d Q Z u 0V z o z o ° ¢ o w 3 L' ' 1 .- o r p a o N i. ¢ a 5 3 5 u p O F " o m ¢aa of o o O $ 3 < ° Ooo wow € w 8 ' 00 LL ' « " ° o a i�a 'Eo J z° y'd - V r iu 4 ° W ro QOf. I- 7 j '' ' a m ' ° " 27 an N wN K6 J J 7 7 7 e a H EH 0 o '20 o o p w ,. r .. ° s W ° = w z°- aw no' ¢ a y m E o _ a ° w r " • 2 c i 8 e 3 1 ¢i 7 Q i - y 2 ° o 4 ` r2 t 685' 1 o W ° 6 g N 1 ` o > rc o N Q - w o g z ° 4 ' i ° - ? p w o - - s y z LL ° o o rc o m °¢ ¢ Na „ i "_- ? ? o ° w o x ? xgw ; ° x ` L5 d -' z ' G 6 6 Q F Ti ILL" i ` " w a x > z y 0 o F U ^. O m 50 612 .19 , 5 `626 i ₹ u D v of o ° z ro oQ 'fin A ° ° w a map $ y $ 5a ° � zoa $ a `° 5i g4 LI oy ° • vi 2z 2 n r, oz oz °¢ y c . a. 6004 0 4 'p0z LLa ` ° b za - ° s € . s , ≥ ax � nW ¢ ° LL a ~ " wo xi- z'�� ° a¢ S'_ �w �V1) 'a oz 4 oo � `q Q oo.g '6o z fl fl ab z mxv I a Q U r2i ry ry ^ ^ ' to- Q W 62 z r '83 Z o 4 Z 7 w y O Z z w € 4 0 J < € ≤ Z F ¢ j 0 2 CO a n a 1 O O Ei 0 2 ' 9 ; 2 F (J' _ 2 i _ F W m m 0 ¢ v ° 2 ¢ a < QJ r jg _ " a ysa - re r o .2nx � o 49 wi " w s $i 54x cW 0 w w w W V 2 W w I v' t - E a ^ O Z Z " = a 2 ° w ' a w Z ¢ 'ill z 0 Z y o i A IMQ > > > > N ms °F 0 > 50 5z t., Zo % a5° 0 3 ' - ° "_ o � _� N = w aowa mgx a ioi Z Z O O O O O W Q F g: 8?,- 0 ✓`i OV W u ( ° w O w O Z - _ - 0w uw. a , p2—p.. 71' 1- 2> 0 Ego ' g rig s E as E°- R. a ' o 'Z ° oLL ~O � � w o owg p oE ° O Fo wo? w z as ° r o 0 .1 w d , o f rc ° ° ° F '0 H F Q o a ' a rc = ' Q o ¢ J s N o Y o > ao io s� J 5 F>- 50 $ o oo � a l- zos i5 I— w ! � m w = w o ° , LL V o hil; rmn wt0N _i f � : w2 .jLL6ai — s - LL 'won W LLzfcwW �w2a i aia u n h 0 0~a r r¢ < , E m o ° z n � m z o o ` m W ° F3 aJ io ly ° zOO2woO ; O w < z°-- io " O " ° o < z S o "i' W riE CD z go o � c.1 “ 6 m a a - tw, ~ o - o, £ O 'z do 7. 2 '6 = f ga£ f ohs w ? a C/ O W J ' ° (9 ° w ^ .nF Gc ° ¢ mw ° ° p v, Y- a aH9 '' Oz ° jg J 4 2 " a z9 x ! op -� ❑ < a ❑ W z o O w a ° i > o z Q C9a � a � m a . < s � . < a w ° � ° f ° f efo a Z_ ct Q EIII�/\/ O T T ! EJ ) A .i,• 471,p,&,,:.; r5 kl k n' i Y i. �,,,,,.,,,„.,,...,,,,,,,,,,4„,,,,r,;,,,vLf ?• 4'7..`:','..s,,'a {K vt{ T'l 9 F kJ y" �e T l� ® ❑ O m �I -22 ,42,2:2::yY% 222 w•l _ C ", ;1 .2,2,- Yr ( d � agin `YhY"%�•yy a4'..6 d0,,,;: S � '. a Q J S ,'.^�1..� ! t ( j "Tfr. F • C` ✓ (/� ♦ F.N iF � dY`S i Cfew h � WW r! Z V O W 1l -y _'1 .� ''';',;:i.414; .S1 ,r'4; rw • sr w 1 ,..:,:„. ....:.,......y.:,,... ,...- ! ?+ f z '. a`":(e,..`z�' 'I n. ¢rz 3 x ;;P '42t. >•2''. W 1 1 1 tL W Z ll i4,:g..,--.•,,,,,-- ,E y Meksy ,.D 3, .,„,. �r m�, '» 2v ^ 2 LLI O Q er O 1 J . G:�tr fi x �r F t 4 Y'ci aW ,1 r,.3 �o O co d 1 M � i '1 ,r- SK. rY • h' + .x ��€xr.My.,syzy 'K{1 f xs37 yam"' 4 ¢} i o W '+t t >L2,vet 222. 8- .nC . l ..: ,2.5°...84,*„..„ t WE._ J W = ` "3 c � 4 fsy fa°`. "k'� '"i}f�f-. � ' 2N: Z LL 3` .y' - 50 @ W -...4c::,:,:,,,::-.-- � „t ' ' ' sir f ,} `4 - >4 �t Me.:s ,-.O.4,-.i. rA } rs'r :',$::;;--;,,;;-,;a4-..:•:' F raw g6 1 ` 'F ;,1)Py l f'4T}1! 1M\ (i'+4RF4...;',,,,:::.4-;,..., tl • a fZ R 1 8 i. Q F T izn Sa )� s.. , ? tF' r} i Pa , , , Ii if`₹t� -rx �u` {; a R w 0 s' s c I L t% 9 l t .�, k -i.'S `u ' 1 i7 7 t . Y ' sImm �.F� Tc "4z iieL;'+3)IP/M',,T7,- {1a 3 dl °'3&c {' ,•Pt F .'YY 6^f}.'J fG CI' U o W M4 r z a tier,ri r E sr Y.y rf W J /0,2:0, $4 J .rte .t . r�iXs..r ¢ ,yga,i ,?»` ,-,_'Y a tn U ' f0 Z U - - CC -. .n n fiia SS^ p �` ff � '1 S r U G_ 2 �0` r-7,1,,,.*- 54 ! l a a,,It t f 'W .,„1„.._4,1t,,,:-:-:?,, -[U Q 0 w V, r fi a-r �" ,7 1 z' 4' •.„440.40,,,,,,,,, s 'Z i Q Oa. ~ 2 O d#, .. ,-z 5, s y,, -•r ,�#,{�r c � _- el<ca w a 6,J n ,5,r t �< N u t r 4 c ,�P '� _,,„fl 9 rt§ F K ff Z r. LL. O SC LLI �1 y a re` ! l R ,,s,,,=.,, _ /LLB-: II J} ",. 1.22 t *� r .'27261 . 5/¢Ydryyct .6 Aiiiniir x"'. 2G V ;F2.2,:' 4{ t O 4 $tr 'r ,y ze-. r ,. � eG' y ,''''Yy2"2.444,424z ,424 `%s`-, { 2 �2: r( *' 'g. 'G3 es5tuue; . 'S;2,2;4', - J s f � `'.*L''' _..nr. 3Kr` �+ Yr. ' �.,i•n•),3 Wi ' .uvr,m 1 .' 441 1 ` 1..x.5` .. a YYf ' vq q yl,�.. T'Jt'Vr 4 �.S d �g ,, - < r�'tio - -I, 4: �4 °d pt l 1 ° lr', •"4.� a , ? ,tx+�aW.�'I 'a. ve' rx S <5 PI p 8 f V N, j e ar;'� s ffsi,rj'„� i' ,�> d G E "(₹ e U `�£ -."3�. iii sr Y t,4 74,:t, • y z4 Yew En .u. (`1L �t �₹� R. 5A st `". Y�.t",'w �'4 , , 'rV� lY � � 7Vi + ° 2 i y,sir j .a?a"y4,gw '�ifk �!X`4b'*y , y 3' .xs„�k, _ -_ ".,� . z y6QQt.h � �! q' 5₹'tl i .JY j Ff ;- rt ₹ ]4Yh S - kk .. 3 ao a -- ,vi.irJOY„'rzn.V YWi wJry[n'2IOU! '+w12C.d '1.0 !LO I' ni'J(]t JdIny r,t.LG ioin-,V P,=I�u�.ol Peai0 d I/ 05 Z 6 ee ` o O I 'b3 Q , o•< 4 M— za a 3 _ X a.e'a �C ° z \J HG bz _ D/ • NU Ni Q/ e 4 o<s ® I p V N LL O y of 0 0 H •U w W ♦ , - 1 - 07 TR r J W Q O II ��5 Q Ce U o3 k iii r: 2 w a Q ei, I _ I� Jim H N re O< 5 u ill ) : 2 p N< � �� z N O U __-fl"- N(r < O LL O W Q I ,t;,s o V J 6 N LL N <o p at CG O < ��J .D 1 N 1 c ''. . Z r b < w u" GO 00 o z � o U (e Z Z OJ E- 1 ® Q CD om < rn J IJJ LL b.Lde-1 ri zN 2ow � I- I Wz 'D —J 1:1 O � � OW " 6o ce -a rl I H w z Im I n< III > � Hoc) LE.) D-5 i C/� II a - - �'� w W WW � � 03 oLL '- T J r 3 �� 5I � z H � w n;� ten' J CO) II O z W z oo�5 wi'ji U e< o - o6 "' II .J •- cc o — Z I riz I I rv< W 3 IIB I �/ Q O D J o j p U U ,--- aW3 .„ ` . < o > z LLI LLI X �,3 � t Z U C DF. -- W T o3 , U ��5 p — c ce 1 I ILL T pI lZ o a z o z "'� �I N i K W II Q a � I CZ o v _ 0 WW W J? I j Lu u...-4 C b O Q O • e Z -HI I H II e e I cc w W �� > _ii LSI 94 O ~ 1 V I J ',1 _...Q _. fi L_U / � 5 UE w d �/ U UO w d r dQ .>z % I p ,wU i5 = I Z H U ¢ U ., '^J II `V4V umol pea}yd'.9v co Z o o O ~ z °- , o'az ZZcoi / II =.. ZNfni _� ( \c_ Tüi' i lz Z Y I I za.o Q "—Atl d m z � ' " o Isy W r- 1 = = W cc ' cy II V) ce d p p / U Z Wvl i i O ,D'oZ O Q W z u7 II Lu J Z qJ Z Low .0'OZ O Q• ''-id ai'li Q Z V ,0'09 i J �. ? n. CO T. i r -wasa 1.9 _ V J /<^ --------,) r Z I Oc zz oom a ¢ O = T‹ zN Iowa wuj Ww „, LL. 2 OHwO OEt Z ~ rV �y w w l- > °0 ° 9ZW Oz ww5w D _ ? }O} Y n zCC X O Z O �'r — T iI! Z � II Q X o C 0 II I J Z I z ZICIC cc I cc L ...— I CI Io LL j LW b f PAN 4 NVd A'Z ii �� //'CURB Y V) , I o // rj I 3NVl DNDINVd Z W p, N IH i i I [us J J CIgJJ Ill h Itl T-31911/3/MdO Aaz 1 L ' JJ I LL , r /2 iro�li ,o9c— Q '1 Aaz-) II o 1 a. '.. I i ��atl--r . I ' �2'PAN H N F&CURB Ij U II II i l�- l • /f I I - W I I CG J A'6s Q /y 4 a ri�.aa M,n�dn euuz rvs'. waf5 t-5W2',' P' x�JipaulY 1 "1.tl.uwd emu JOAN npi5oLLp.. uv 4oly «a1PeryYdtluu 0 TETRA TECH July 17, 2008 Town of Mead 441 Third Street P.O Box 626 Mead, CO 80542 Attn: Town Manager RE: Equinox Annexation and Rezoning PA's 1-6 PUD (formerly submitted as Mead Town Center) Northern Colorado Water Conservancy District Petition Tetra Tech Job No. 133-26064.08001 Dear Town Manager: The Equinox Annexation and Rezoning PA's 1-6 PUD subdivision is requesting annexation into the Town of Mead, proposing a residential and commercial/mixed-use development. The project is located in the Southwest Quarter of Section 22, Township 3 North, Range 68 West of the 6th Principal Meridian, County of Weld, State of Colorado. More specifically, the development is • located north of State Highway (SH) 66 and east of Weld Country Road (WCR) 7. The Equinox development is approximately 113 acres. In preparation for the annexation process, this letter addresses the project's inclusion into the Northern Colorado Water Conservancy District (NCWCD). Tetra Tech contacted the NCWCD to determine if the subject property is already included in the district or if a petition would be required. The NCWCD confirmed that the proposed site is located within the district. The NCWCD will provide a letter confirming that the subject property is within the district boundary upon request. Please feel free to contact us with any questions, or if you require additional information. Sincerely, TETRA TECH 7 / ( i 7 Cameron Fowlkes, P.E. Project Manager P:\133_26064_08001 Mead Place\Deliverables\A,mexation\NCWCD Statement.doc • 1900 S.Sunset Street,Suite I-0 Longmont.CO 80501 Tel 303.772.5282 Fax 3037/2-/039 wwwtetratech_corn • • SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED NON-TRIBUTARY AND NOT NON-TRIBUTARY GROUNDWATER THIS DEED,made this day of , between Rodney J. Schmidt, Equinox Mead LLC,Tom Schmidgall, and New Frontier Bank, grantors and the Town of Mead, P.O. Box 626,Mead, CO 80542, of the County of Weld, State of Colorado: WITNESSETH,that the grantors, for and in consideration of the sum of Ten dollars and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, have granted,bargained, sold and conveyed, and by these presents do grant,bargain, sell, convey, and confirm, unto the grantee and its successors and assigns forever, all the real property, together with improvements, if any, situate, lying and being in the South %1 of Section 22,Township 3 North, Range 68 West, of the 6th P.M., County of Weld, State of Colorado, described as follows: All non-tributary and not non-tributary groundwater as defined by C.R.S. § 37-90-103, whether adjudicated, unadjudicated,permitted or • unpermitted, underlying the property described in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein. also known by street and number as: assessor's schedule or parcel number: 120722300002 and 120722000030 • TOGETHER with all and singular the hereditaments and appurtenances thereto belonging, or in anywise appertaining, and the reversion and reversions,remainder and remainders, rents, issues and profits thereof; and all the estate, right, title, interest, claim and demand whatsoever of the grantors either in law or equity, of, in and to the above bargained water rights, with the hereditaments and appurtenances; TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the said water rights above bargained and described with the appurtenances, unto the grantee and its successors and assigns forever. The grantors, for themselves ,their heirs and personal representatives or successors, do covenant and agree that it shall and will WARRANT AND FOREVER DEFEND the above-bargained water rights in the quiet and peaceable possession of the grantee, and its successors and assigns, against all and every person or persons claiming the whole or any part thereof, by, through or under the grantor. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the grantors have executed this deed on the date set forth above. Date Signature RODNEY J. SCHMIDT (OWNER OF PARCEL AT REC. NO. 3414623 and REC.NO. 3519971) • 1 Date 5-9( - 2 Signature SY • RODNEY J. SCHMIDT (OWNER OF PARCEL AT REC.NO. 3414623) STATE OF COLORADO ) ) SS. COUNTY OF Ecialcier ) The foregoing instrument was�acknowledged before me this q day of Mal20 U� by i7—od tc 3 . Schm;e1 f � 'pVIS �i�gq��. My commission expires: "21141 zo i o . - tte 0= gPAY\ . Witness My hand and official seal. L - m� ? U los ( • Notary Public 51% s1• p0Ov ••',.....z? Date S-Le- ,ZODg Signature Date Vets/Oe Signature . ,,1 EQUINOX MEAD LLC (OWNER OF PARCEL AT REC.NO. 3519971) • STATE OF COLORADO ) SS COUNTY OF A. VpQ'rw t c - - The foregoing instrument was�-_acknowledged before me this Q day;of EMILY VINZ ILIQi ,20 thy ` eeno t 1.14.4n(tn 1f &cne_ dSbervtt . NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF COLORADO My commission expires:/C/. DAD - n ` My Ccmmissllon E .fires 10/30/2010 Th Witness My hand and official seal. �' L�2- if/ tary 13112129) Date 7f IZ or, signature /A5 >/✓ TO SCHMID ALL (MORTGAGE OR LIENHOLDER OF PARCEL AT REC.NO. 3519971) STATE OF COtORAT317 rafatc ) SS. COUNTY OF 9144(z.45, ) 0 C:\Documents and Settingsyschmidt\Local Settings\Temporary Internet files\OLK6\Warranty Deed far Non-tbutary Water Rights doc • The foregoing instrument was acknowled ed before me this rrAl day of Y�Ft`I ,20 D�by V"Wckk My commission expires: Witness My hand and official seal. wetit*r44.w..4S �A 1- Notary Public WNF711MNAWL0N 31Hl1f13 FI1DJ1 • Date 54-10(26 Signature RODNEY J. SCHMIDT (MORTGAGE OR LIENHOLDER OF PARCEL AT REC.NO. 3519971) STATE OF COLORADO ) SS. COUNTY OF Wolcke(' ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this Q day of MU.] ,20 Og by o6(1 e 3 T Sch.rn i 4— .al inn N,��. X41 4I ro to �K"r` q My commission expires: mr p y • Witness My hand and official seal. _= vs Notary Public y PUIr Date Signature NEW FRONTIER BANK (MORTGAGE OR LIENHOLDER OF PARCEL AT REC.NO. 3519971) STATE OF COLORADO SS. COUNTY OF The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 20 by My commission expires: Witness My hand and official seal. Notary Public • C\Documents and SettirgsVSUmidtrLocal Settings\Temporary Internet Files\DLK6\Warranty Deed for Non-tributary Water Rights doc The foregoing instrument was acknowled ed before me this al day of Ifetf` ,20 0X41 by 5U S�tN My commission expires: - Witness My hand and official seal. altiounsitromitiontffis VIOSINIM OIWIdMN104 otary Public 13'30439 a0V39f13 H13M a Date 5.4'Z0CE3 Signature RODNE . SCHMIDT (MORTGAGE OR LIENHOLDER OF PARCEL AT REC.NO.3519971) STATE OF COLORADO ) • SS. • COUNTY OF .£Dulctef ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this q day of C\IV9 ,20 08 by aoc@ney �' cchrn, ouanortf A • My commission expires: "a- -tow et?". %� Witness My hand and official seal. 62-7c7Sc,'(:0 ...4 c Arty - Notary Public P 15 1Qga / o•q''N1GO. `\`C Date ; �f•7v/Ur Signature /0 _ (//4-, ,_.t/ !!! NEW ON ANK . (MORTGAGE OR LIENHOLDE /OF PARCEL AT REC.NO. 3519 I) STATE OF COLORADO ) • SS. COUNTY OF ({/1-eaa ) ) The foregoing instrq ent was c owled re me this day of -7 ,2Q1. by • My commission expires: Cv 9-�f Witness My hand and official sea . . 0 13,O14SPu11 Lti otary Public 4T£ ' ''''' • C\Doamenf,and SeltingsWs hnidf tocat Setlingstiemporary Internet Files10LN6\Warranty Deed for Non-tnbulary Water Nights doc TETRA TECH • EXHIBIT A A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED IN THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 68 WEST OF THE 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, TOWN OF MEAD, COUNTY OF WELD, STATE OF COLORADO BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE WEST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 22 WHENCE THE SOUTHWEST CORNER BEARS SOUTH 00°26'23" EAST 2648.73 FEET, SAID LINE FORMING THE BASIS OF BEARING FOR THIS LEGAL DESCRIPTION; THENCE NORTH 88°50'51" EAST 30 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY OF WELD COUNTY ROAD NO. 7 AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 22 NORTH 88°50'51" EAST 1185.50 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WESTERLY BOUNDARY OF MULLIGAN RESERVOIR; THENCE ALONG THE BOUNDARY OF SAID MULLIGAN RESERVOIR THE FOLLOWING 15 COURSES; SOUTH 15°09'21" EAST 283.80 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 22°38'20" EAST 191.40 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 45°12'21" EAST 151.80 FEET; THENCE NORTH 64°29'39" EAST 129.30 FEET; THENCE NORTH 37°40'39" EAST 154.50 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 82°23'21" EAST 110.90 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 48°31'21" EAST 126.40 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 15°25'21" EAST 197.70 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00°36'39" WEST 223.70 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 21°35'21" EAST 145.20 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 71°15'21" EAST 128.90 FEET; • THENCE SOUTH 81°55'21" EAST 308.50 FEET; THENCE NORTH 67°28'39" EAST 175.20 FEET; THENCE NORTH 49°09'39" EAST 131.40 FEET; THENCE NORTH 23°17'39" EAST 192.26 FEET; THENCE NORTH 69°39'13" EAST 76.17 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT B OF RECORDED EXEMPTION NO. 1207-22-4-AMRE-2318; THENCE ALONG THE BOUNDARY OF SAID LOT B THE FOLLOWING THREE COURSES; THENCE SOUTH 01°09'47" EAST 575.55 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 88°49'54" WEST 318.27 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00°26'39" EAST 521.10 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF TRACT 2 OF WEINGARDT ESTATES; THENCE ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID TRACT 2 SOUTH 88°49'43" WEST 1076.97 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE EBERL AGRICULTURAL UNIT DEVELOPMENT; THENCE ALONG THE BOUNDARY LINE OF SAID EBERL AGRICULTURAL UNIT DEVELOPMENT THE FOLLOWING 2 COURSES; NORTH 00°26'23" WEST 303.71 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 88°49'55" WEST 1403.01 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF WELD COUNTY ROAD NO. 7; THENCE ALONG SAID LINE NORTH 00°26'23" WEST 475.78 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT A OF RECORDED EXEMPTION NO. 1207-22-3 RE3126; THENCE ALONG THE BOUNDARY OF SAID LOT A THE FOLLOWING 3 COURSES; THENCE NORTH 89°33'37" EAST 276.73 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00°23'23" WEST 255.26 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89°33'37" WEST 276.73 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EAST RIGHT-OF- WAY LINE OF WELD COUNTY ROAD NO. 7; THENCE ALONG SAID LINE NORTH 00°26'23" WEST 851.11 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. THE ABOVE DESCRIBED TRACT CONTAINS 77.300 ACRES MORE OR LESS. ii 1900 S.SUNSET STREET,SUITE I-F LONGMONT,CO 80501 TEL:303 772.5282 FAX 303.772.7039 www.tetratech.com • 1,4 ,a axe �. } EE:C May 5, 2008 EARTH ENGINEERING Mead Development Group, Inc. CONSULTANTS, INC. 9055 East Mineral Circle #100 Centennial, Colorado 80112 Attn: Mr. Roger Hollard Re: Stated Groundwater Levels In Our Exploration Report Mead Place / Town Center Planned Mixed Use Development Mead, Colorado EEC Project No. 1072158 Mr. Hollard: We have been asked to reply to the comments from the Town of Mead regarding our stated groundwater in our Subsurface Exploration Report for the Mead Place / Town Center Planned Mixed Use Development, Project No. 1072158, dated January 17, 2008. At the time of our original exploration, twenty one (21) PVC piezometers were installed at each specific boring • location to allow for longer-term monitoring of groundwater levels on the site. The stated groundwater levels on Page 4 of the above referenced report are incorrect. The groundwater levels on Page 4 of the report should read "from approximately six (6) feet to sixteen (16) feet below present ground surface." We apologize for this error and appreciate this being brought to our attention. If you have any questions concerning this report, or if we can be of further service to you in any other way, please do not hesitate to contact us. Very truly yours, Earth Engineering Consultants, Inc. Reviewed by: t" • k 23957 l Gary J. Higgins Lester L. Litton, P.E. Engineering Geologist Principal Engineer • cc: Tiffany Holcomb—tholcomb@nuszer-kopatz.com 4396 GREENFIELD DRIVE WINDSOR, COLORADO 80550 (970) 545-3908 FAX (970) 663-0282 t' .. • SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION REPORT MEAD PLACE/TOWN CENTER PLANNED MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENT MEAD,COLORADO EEC PROJECT NO. 1072158 • S • k' EEC` January 17, 2008 r • EARTH ENGINEERING Mead Development Group,Inc. CONSULTANTS, INc. 9055 East Mineral Circle#100 Centennial,Colorado 80112 Attn: Mr. Roger Hollard Re: Preliminary Subsurface Exploration Mead Place/Town Center Planned Mixed Use Development Mead,Colorado EEC Project No. 1072158 Mr.Hollard: Enclosed, herewith, are the results of the preliminary geotechnical subsurface exploration you requested for the referenced project. In summary, the subsurface materials encountered in the test borings consisted of sandy lean clay overlying siltstone and claystone bedrock. Groundwater was encountered in all borings at the time of our field exploration. • Based on the materials encountered in the test borings, we expect lightly loaded site buildings could be supported on conventional footing foundations bearing on the near surface sandy lean clay soils or underlying highly weathered bedrock. More heavily loaded structures might be supported on drilled pier foundations extending into the bedrock. The near surface soils appear useable for support of the floor slabs and pavements. Preliminary geotechnical recommendations concerning design and construction of the foundations and support of floor slabs and pavements are provided in the attached report. We appreciate the opportunity to be of service to you on this project. If you have any questions concerning the enclosed report, or if we can be of further service to you in any other way,please do not hesitate to contact us. Very truly yours, Earth Engineering Consultants,Inc. Reviewed by: tre, • 23957 fri8 C Gary J. Higgins Lester L. Litton, P.E. • Engineering Geologist Principal Engineer 4396 GREENFIELD DRIVE WINDSOR, COLORADO 80550 (970) 545-3908 FAX (970) 663-0282 • SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION REPORT MEAD PLACE/TOWN CENTER PLANNED MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENT MEAD, COLORADO EEC PROJECT NO. 1072158 January 17, 2008 INTRODUCTION The preliminary geotechnical subsurface exploration for the Mead Place/Town Center Planned Mixed-Use Development property located on the north side of Colorado State Highway 66, starting from approximately one-quarter (''A) mile west of Interstate 25 and continuing approximately one and one-half(1%)miles west to the Great Western Railroad tracks and continuing north for approximately one-half(Y:) mile, in Mead, Colorado, has been completed. As a part of this exploration,twenty one(21)soil borings were extended to • depths of approximately 15 to 25 feet below present site grades to develop information on existing subsurface conditions. Individual boring logs and a diagram indicating the approximate boring locations are provided with this report. Site photographs of the property at the time of our exploration are also provided with this report. The Mead Place/Town Center Property includes approximately 300 acres of development area. We understand this development will include mixed use residential and commercial/retail development. We expect the site structures will be one or two story wood or metal frame buildings constructed either as slab-on-grade or with full basements. Foundation loads for the residential buildings are expected to be light with continuous wall loads less than 2 kips per lineal foot and individual column loads less than 50 kips. Foundation loads for the commercial/retail buildings are expected to be light to moderate with maximum continuous wall loads in the 4 kips per lineal foot range and individual column loads up to 200 kips. Floor loads are expected to be light. Site infrastructure will include city streets and utilities. Small grade changes are expected to develop final site grades. • Earth Engineering Consultants,Inc. EEC Project No. 1072158 January 17,2008 Page 2 The purpose of this report is to describe the subsurface conditions encountered in the borings, analyze and evaluate the test data and provide preliminary geotechnical recommendations concerning design and construction of foundations and support of floor slabs for site structures and geotechnical recommendations for development of site infrastructure. EXPLORATION AND TESTING PROCEDURES The test boring locations were selected and established in the field by representatives of Earth Engineering Consultants,Inc. (EEC). Field locations were determined by pacing and estimating angles from identifiable site features. The twenty one (21) borings were completed in the field by EEC personnel, and subsequently located both horizontally and vertically by Tetra Tech RMC, Inc. Photographs of the site at the time of drilling are included with this report. • The borings were performed using a truck mounted, CME-45 drill rig equipped with a hydraulic head employed in drilling and sampling operations. The boreholes were advanced using 4-inch nominal diameter continuous flight augers. Samples of the subsurface materials encountered were obtained using split-barrel and California barrel sampling techniques in general accordance with ASTM Specification D-1586 and using thin-walled"Shelby"tube sampling procedures in general accordance with ASTM specification D-1587. In the split-barrel and California barrel sampling techniques,standard sampling spoons are driven into the ground by means of a 140-pound hammer falling a distance of 30 inches. The number of blows required to advance the samplers is recorded and used to estimate the in- situ relative density of cohesionless materials and, to a lesser degree of accuracy, the consistency of cohesive soils. In the California barrel and Shelby tube sampling procedures, relatively undisturbed samples are obtained from the field. All samples obtained in the field were sealed and returned to the laboratory for further examination,classification and testing. Moisture content tests were performed on each of the recovered samples. In addition, the • unconfined strength of appropriate samples was estimated using a calibrated hand Earth Engineering Consultants,Inc. • EEC Project No. 1072158 January 17,2008 Page 3 penetrometer. Washed sieve analysis and Atterberg limits tests were completed on selected samples to evaluate the quantity and plasticity of the fines in the subgrades. Swell/consolidation tests were performed on selected samples to evaluate the tendency of the site soils to change volume under load with increased moisture. Results of the outlined tests are indicated on the attached boring logs and summary sheets. As a part of the testing program,all samples were examined in the laboratory by an engineer and classified in accordance with the attached General Notes and the Unified Soil Classification System based on the texture and plasticity of the soil. The estimated group symbol for the Unified Soil Classification System is indicated on the boring logs. A brief description of the Unified Soil Classification System is included with this report. SITE AND SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS The proposed subdivision will be located on the north side of Colorado State Highway 66, • starting from approximately one-quarter (''A) mile west of Interstate 25 and continuing approximately one and one-half(1'/z) miles west to the Great Western Railroad tracks and continuing north for approximately one-half('A)mile,in Mead,Colorado. The site varies in slope,with the western portion sloping gently to the west-southwest and the eastern portion sloping gently to the east-northeast with a maximum difference in ground surface elevation across the site estimated to be approximately 40 feet. The site consists of multiple individual properties and appears to have been used primarily as agricultural and ranching land. Several existing buildings and oil/gas wells were noted across the site by EEC personnel. An EEC field engineer was on site during drilling to evaluate the subsurface conditions encountered and direct the drilling activities. Field logs prepared by EEC site personnel were based on visual and tactual observation of disturbed samples and auger cuttings. The final boring logs included with this report may contain modifications to the field logs based on the results of laboratory testing and evaluation. Based on the results of the field borings and laboratory evaluation, subsurface conditions can be generalized as follows. • • Earth Engineering Consultants,Inc. EEC Project No. 1072158 January 17,2008 Page 4 Approximately 6 to 12 inches of topsoil and vegetation were encountered at the surface of the borings. The topsoil and vegetation were underlain by five and one-half(5''A) feet to fourteen (14) feet of brown to red sandy lean clay or lean clay with sand over siltstone/claystone bedrock. The sandy lean clay or lean clay with sand was soft to very stiff with low to no swell potential as measured in laboratory testing at current moisture and density. The underlying siltstone/claystone bedrock was soft to moderately hard and was generally less weathered with depth. The bedrock formation exhibited low to no swell potential as measured in laboratory testing at current moisture and density. The stratification boundaries indicated on the boring logs represent the approximate locations of changes in soil and rock types. In-situ, the transition of materials may be gradual and indistinct. • GROUNDWATER CONDITIONS Observations were made while drilling,after completion and several days after drilling of the borings to detect the presence and depth to hydrostatic groundwater. Field slotted PVC piezometers were installed at each of the boring locations to allow for the longer term measurements. At the time of drilling, free water was observed at depths ranging from approximately seven(7)feet to thirteen(13)feet below present ground surface. Longer term measurements in the cased borings would be required to more accurately evaluate groundwater levels and fluctuations in the groundwater levels over time. Fluctuations in groundwater levels can occur over time depending on variations in hydrologic conditions and other conditions not apparent at the time of this report. Zones of perched and/or trapped water may be encountered at times throughout the year in more permeable zones in the subgrade soils. Perched water is commonly encountered in soils overlying less permeable bedrock. The location and amount of perched/trapped water can also vary over time depending on hydrologic conditions and other conditions not apparent at the time of this report. • • Earih Engineering Consultants,Inc. • EEC Project No. 1072158 January 17,2008 Page 5 ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Foundations At expected foundation bearing depths,the subgrade materials may consist of either stiff to soft lean clay soils or highly weathered bedrock. An approximate bedrock contour diagram and a diagram indicating the expected depth to bedrock are provided with this report. Those diagrams are based on a limited number of data points and,unlike surface contours, visual confirmation of topographic features is not possible. The site structures are expected to have foundation column loads varying from less than 50 kips to greater than 200 kips. In general,we expect column loads less than 100 kips could be supported on footing foundations bearing in the overburden lean clay soils. We expect column loads in excess of 200 kips would likely be supported on footing foundations bearing • on structural fill, directly on the site bedrock or on drilled pier foundations bearing on the weathered bedrock. Support of column loads in the range of 100 to 200 kips could be either footings or piers extending to the bedrock and might be able to be supported on fooling foundations on the overburden soil, depending on the consistency of the material at the specific building location. Footings in this load range to be supported on the lean clay soils should be evaluated separately based, in part, on the thickness of the clay layer above the bedrock and associated settlement estimate. Footing Foundations Based on materials observed at the test boring locations, we anticipate lightly loaded structures could likely be supported on footing foundations bearing in the overburden sandy lean clay soils. A portion of the site structures,whether based on full basement construction or on specific site locations, may have footing foundations extending to bear on the siltstone/claystone bedrock. Footing foundations on the siltstone/claystone bedrock could generally be used to support light to moderately heavy loads. • Earth Engineering Consultants,Inc. EEC Project No. 1072158 January 17,2008 Page 6 For lightly loaded footing foundations bearing on the overburden sandy lean clays, we suggest foundations would extend through all existing vegetation and surface topsoil and bear in the natural, stiff to very stiff lean clay with varying amounts of sand. For design of footing foundations bearing in the natural, stiff to very stiff lean clay,we would anticipate using net allowable total load soil bearing pressures in the range of 1,500 psf to 3,000 psf. The net bearing pressure refers to the pressure at foundation bearing level in excess of the minimum surrounding overburden pressure. Total load should include full dead and live loads. Softer overburden soils were encountered in borings B-3, B-5, B-7, B-14 and B-16. Care should be taken during final design and construction to thoroughly evaluate the bearing soils to see that all footing foundations are supported on suitable strength natural materials. If unacceptable soils are observed,it may be necessary to remove those materials and develop • suitable fills for support of the foundations or extend footings to bear in the underlying bedrock. For footing foundations extending to bear in the soft to moderately hard highly weathered siltstone/claystone bedrock, we expect net allowable total load soil bearing pressures in the range of 5,000 psf would be possible. We would expect the foundations for individual buildings be extended to bear in similar strata. Exterior foundations and foundations in unheated areas would normally be located at least 30 inches below final adjacent exterior grade to provide frost protection. We believe formed continuous footings would have minimum widths in the range of 12 to 16 inches and isolated column foundations would have minimum widths in the range of 24 to 30 inches. Care should be taken at the time of construction to see that footing foundations are extended to suitable strength natural materials. Care should also be taken during final design and construction to see that the swell potential of anticipated bearing soils is evaluated to reduce the potential for higher expansive materials remaining in place beneath the footings. Earth Engineering Consultants.lnc. • EEC Project No. 1072158 January 17,2008 Page 7 We would expect the long-term settlement of the outlined footing foundations supported on suitable strength sandy lean clays or underlying highly weathered sandstone bedrock would be estimated to be less than 1 inch. Specific building settlement should be evaluated as a part of final design and would depend on design loads and bearing materials. Drilled Pier Foundations For support of more heavily loaded buildings,where footings would not extend to bear in the highly weathered bedrock, we anticipate drilled pier foundations would be used. Drilled piers would develop bearing capacity through end bearing and skin friction in the underlying highly weathered siltstone/claystone bedrock. We suggest total load end bearing pressures of 15 to 30 ksf would be recommended for design of drilled pier foundations extending at least 5 feet into the underlying bedrock. Skin friction values of 1500 to 3000 psf would be expected for at least a portion of the penetration. • Based on subsurface conditions observed at the time of our field observations,we anticipate temporary casings may be required to maintain open boreholes for construction of the drilled pier foundations. Care would be required at the time of construction to thoroughly clean the bearing surface and to place concrete as soon as practical after completion of the borings. Seismic Based on the results of our completed subsurface exploration of the site,foundations bearing on the site overburden sandy lean clay and/or clayey sand soils or foundations extending in the underlying bedrock,would be supported on a seismic Site Class D, in accordance with the International Building Code (2003 IBC). Floor Slab/Pavement Subgrades Any existing vegetation and/or topsoil should be removed from beneath fill, floor slabs, slabs-on-grade and proposed pavements. After stripping and completing all cuts and prior to • Earth Engineering Consultants,Inc. EEC Project No. 1072158 January 17,2008 Page 8 placement of any fill,structures or pavement,we recommend the in-place soils be scarified to a minimum depth of 9 inches,adjusted in moisture content and compacted to at least 95%of the material's maximum dry density as determined in accordance with ASTM Specification D-698,the standard Proctor procedure. The moisture content of the scarified soils should be adjusted to be within the range of±2%of standard Proctor optimum moisture at the time of compaction. Fill soils required to develop site grades should consist of approved, low-volume change materials which are free from organic matter and debris. Based on testing completed as a part of this project, it is our opinion the near surface sandy lean clay could be used as fill in these areas. Off-site similar soils or possibly,structural fill could also be used in the building areas. • The site sandy lean clay would be susceptible to strength loss and instability when wetted. If construction occurs during wet periods of the year, stabilization of the pavement subgrades may become necessary to develop a suitable paving platform. Fly ash stabilization of the pavement subgrades could be considered. We would be pleased to provide additional recommendations concerning subgrade stabilization at your request. Care should be taken after preparation of the subgrades to avoid disturbing the subgrade materials. Materials which are loosened or disturbed by the construction activities or materials which become dry and desiccated or wet and softened should be removed and replaced prior to placement of the overlying floor slabs, flatwork or pavements. Pavements We expect the site pavements will be used predominately by automobiles and light trucks. Some heavier truck traffic may use a portion of the pavements. Based on prior experience with similar soil subgrade and traffic conditions,we recommend • the pavement section for "local", low volume streets consist of at least 4 inches of hot Earth Engineering Consultants,Inc. • EEC Project No. 1072158 January 17,2008 Page 9 bituminous pavement(HBP)over 6 inches of aggregate base course(ABC). Thicker sections may be warranted in higher traffic volume pavements or areas of heavier truck traffic. The recommended pavement section is a minimum. Final pavement design should be based on street classification/project traffic as well as subgrade conditions. The asphalt pavement should consist of grading S (75)with PG 58-28 asphalt cement. The aggregate base should be Class 5 or Class 6 base. Positive drainage should be developed across the pavements and away from the pavement edges to avoid wetting the pavement subgrades. Subgrades allowed to become wetted subsequent to construction can result in unsatisfactory performance of those improvements over time. Other Considerations . Positive drainage should be developed away from the structures with a minimum slope of 1 inch per foot for the first 10 feet away from the building in landscape areas although flatter slopes could be used in hardscape areas. Care should be taken in planning of landscaping adjacent to buildings to avoid features which would pond water adjacent to the foundations or stemwalls. Placement of plants which require irrigation system or could result in fluctuations of the moisture content of the subgrade material should be avoided adjacent to the structure. Roof drains should be designed to discharge at least 5 feet away from the structures and away from the pavement areas. Utility Installation We expect conventional excavation method to be used in utility installation. Bedding around utility pipelines should be placed in accordance with recommendations from the pipeline designer. Backfill soils placed above the utility lines should consist of approved materials which are free from organic matter and debris. The on-site soils could be used as utility backfill. • Earth Engineering Consultants,Inc. EEC Project No. 1072158 January 17,2008 Page 10 Groundwater was observed at depths ranging from 6 to 16 feet below present site grades in the borings. Excavations extending to the wetter clay soils could create difficulties for backfilling of the utility trenches. Drying of the subgrade soils may be required to use those materials as backfill. In general,the subgrade soils could be used as overlot fill and backfill soils although care will be necessary to maintain sufficient moisture to reduce potential for post-construction movement. Utility backfill should be placed in maximum 9-inch loose lifts,adjusted to within±2%of optimum moisture content and compacted to at least 95%of standard Proctor maximum dry density per ASTM Specification D-698. GENERAL COMMENTS • The analysis and preliminary recommendations presented in this report are based upon the data obtained from the soil borings performed at the indicated locations and from any other information discussed in this report. This report does not reflect any variations that may occur between borings or across the site. The nature and extent of such variations may not become evident until construction. If variations appear evident, it will be necessary to re- evaluate the recommendations of this report. It is recommended that the geotechnical engineer be retained to review the plans and specifications so comments can be made regarding the interpretation and implementation of our geotechnical recommendations in the design and specifications. It is further recommended that the geotechnical engineer be retained for testing and observations during earthwork and foundation construction phases to help determine that the design requirements are fulfilled. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of the Mead Development Group, Inc. for specific application to the project discussed and has been prepared in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering practices. No warranty,express or implied, is • made. In the event any changes in the nature,design or location of the project as outlined in ) Earth Engineering Consultants,Inc. • EEC Project No. 1072158 January 17,2008 Page 11 this report are planned,the conclusions and recommendations contained in this report shall not be considered valid unless the changes are reviewed and the conclusions of this report are modified or verified in writing by the geotechnical engineer. • • DRILLING AND EXPLORATION IlliDRILLING&SAMPLING SYMBOLS: SS: Split Spoon- 13/8" I.D.,2"O.D.,unless otherwise noted PS: Piston Sample ST: Thin-Walled Tube-2"O.D.,unless otherwise noted WS: Wash Sample R: Ring Barrel Sampler-2.42" I.D.,3" O.D.unless otherwise noted PA: Power Auger FT: Fish Tail Bit HA: Hand Auger RB: Rock Bit DB: Diamond Bit=4",N,B BS: Bulk Sample AS: Auger Sample PM: Pressure Meter HS: Hollow Stem Auger WB: Wash Bore Standard"N"Penetration: Blows per foot of a 140 pound hammer falling 30 inches on a2-inch O.D.split spoon,except where noted. WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENT SYMBOLS: WL : Water Level WS : While Sampling WCI: Wet Cave in WD: While Drilling DCI: Dry Cave in BCR: Before Casing Removal AB : After Boring ACR: After Casting Removal Water levels indicated on the boring logs are the levels measured in the borings at the time indicated. In pervious soils,the indicated levels may reflect the location of ground water. In low permeability soils,the accurate determination of ground water levels is not possible with only short term observations. DESCRIPTIVE SOIL CLASSIFICATION PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF BEDROCK Soil Classification is based on the Unified Soil Classification DEGREE OF WEATHERING: system and the ASTM Designations D-2488. Coarse Grained Slight Slight decomposition of parent material on Soils have move than 50%of their dry weight retained on a#200 joints. May be color change. • sieve;they are described as: boulders,cobbles,gravel or sand. Moderate Some decomposition and color change Fine Grained Soils have less than 50% of their dry weight throughout. retained on a#200 sieve;they are described as : clays, if they High Rock highly decomposed, may be extremely are plastic, and silts if they are slightly plastic or non-plastic. broken. Major constituents may be added as modifiers and minor HARDNESS AND DEGREE OF CEMENTATION: constituents may be added according to the relative proportions Limestone and Dolomite: based on grain size. In addition to gradation, coarse grained Hard Difficult to scratch with knife. soils are defined on the basis of their relative in-place density Moderately Can be scratched easily with knife. and fine grained soils on the basis of their consistency. Example: Lean clay with sand, trace gravel, stiff(CL); silty Hard Cannot be scratched with fingernail. sand,trace gravel,medium dense(SM). Soft Can be scratched with fingernail. CONSISTENCY OF FINE-GRAINED SOILS Shale,Siltstone and Claystone: Hard Can be scratched easily with knife,cannot be scratched with fingernail. Unconfined Compressive Strength,Qu,psf Consistency Moderately Can be scratched with fingernail. Hard < 500 Very Soft Soft Can be easily dented but not molded with 500- 1,000 Soft fingers. 1,001 - 2,000 Medium Sandstone and Conglomerate: 2,001 - 4,000 Stiff Well Capable of scratching a knife blade. 4,001 - 8,000 Very Stiff Cemented 8,001 - 16,000 Very Hard Cemented Can be scratched with knife. RELATIVE DENSITY OF COARSE-GRAINED SOILS: Poorly Can be broken apart easily with fingers. N-Blows/ft Relative Density Cemented 0-3 Very Loose 4-9• 10- Loose 10-29 Medium Dense ^ 30-49 Dense EO 3E 50-80 Very Dense �••/ 80+ Extremely Dense U UFIED SOIL CLA.SSILFICA'!U'N SYSTEM • . ._,, Soil Classification — Group Group Nome Criteria for Assigning Group Stmbds and Group norm Using leboratary Tests Symbol Coarse—Grained Grovels more than Clean Grovels Less Soils more than 50% of coarse thon 5% fines Cu Z4 and <C,c53` GW Well—graded grovel' 50% retained on fraction retained • - No. 200 sieve on No. 4 sieve Cu<4 and/or 1>Cc>3' GP Poorly—graded gravel` Grovels with Fines Fines classify as ML or MH Cµ Silty grovel, GM more than 12% fines Fines classify as CL or CH GC Cloyey Gravely." Sands 50% or Cleon Sands Less Cum and 1<C.c≤3` sw Well—graded sond' more course than 5% fines fraction passes Cu<6 and/or 1>Cc>3` SP Poorly—graded sond' No. 4 sieve Sands with Fines Fines classify as ML or MH Sµ Silty sand" more than 12% fines Fines classify as CL or CH SC Cloyey sond" ..- Fine-Groaned Silts and Clays inorganic Pl>7 and plots on or above 'A'Line' CL Lean cloy'"" Soils 50% or Liquid Limit less more posses the than 50 Pl<4 or plots below 'A'Line ML Silt'U.'. No. 200 sieve organic Uquid Limit - oven dried Organic cloy+uwr <0.75 OL Uquid Umit - not dried Organic silt"" Sills and Clays inorganic PI plots on or above "A-Line CH Fat clay`}" Liquid Umit 50 or more pi plots below 'Aline MH Elastic Silt' organic Uquid Umit - oven dried Organic cloy"•' III <0.75 OH Uquid Umit — not dried Organic slt' Highly organic soils Primarily organic matter, dark in color, and organic odor PT Peat 'eased n on th! motertol passing Iha 3-tn. (75- 5CU}�Q'Cc= (e r-) 'If sal contains IS l0 295ilus No. 200. add D K "Nth sond or 'slat grower, whichever is sIl field sample contaned cobbles or boulders, predominant err both, add 'with cobbles or boulders, or bath- 'if sal eontotns 2 30- plus lie. Zaa to group nome. 'II sot contains 2152 Bond, add'wtlh•sond'lo predominantly sond. add 'sandy to gram CCrovels with S to )2X Sans required duol nook. group son+e. +ymnd,e cif fines elassily m CL-Ml, use duo( symbol cif soi contains 2 3az alas Na 200 aW-alt well graded gravel with sat CC-C.11. or SC,SU, predominantly growl, odd gravely TOW oup tly-0C well-graded grovel with day 'Sr fins pre orgonic,odd'with organic lines-to ��'� CP-Ctd poony-graded 9,End with sit grwp namePI.24 and plats on or above 'A' line. GP-0C poorly-graded gravel with cloy +II sal contains >i5Syravel, add'•ilh mover •PIS4 or plots below'A' One. °Soonde with 5 to 12.Z roes require died PI plate an or shove A'lko.. to group none. sywlbds; of Ativb limits °PI plots below 'A' One. SW-SM w5R-,yodel sand witA sell Ct erg plots shaded area, col is e SW-SC w gr all- oded sand with cloy -Bl, filly cloy. SP-gf poorly graded sond with slit SP-SC poorly graded sand with tloy so ...." / For oodresam.f 5a.-�einad mar el grairwd write me ro .d toed.a ma.: saw tamale..r.s•-err. hwtomus.t'eve r.u-us C,, -- ere N-473(LL-ip) ‘./ e tavdan.f v-line -j. Q r X 4° dr draw r�-se at 's a n-7, Z G r 3e._ L--- a1O-.4 fir ' a �'' Cf\- H aA OH r to- i MLiCL • r as 10 10 .le 50 50 50 r0 a7 10 /0i 110 UOuio UMIT (IL) R hR a ®e \ L O Y ',,�t```q. qay C��}, ° 'm9 �'^, t ® I i : `� VI cn I ' iktn ' � � � ,i-41'544� ,..;`�\`®" \ 'tgJ.#1 � � I¢rid m' .ate 1. ' if U�S2t ,- $ t ^',rr t ,'r �I.1.427.01- �� 7. �, Y y,71�v� r i 'b''fa );,, f 3 ! U' qt gpp cra ti �I? y e & \''.‘, LFa'�^v�ul t 5 . W , n Pr;n IP 9 k �-! j co N i - a 3 / ' $ i`, I s 4. ,y1 N 1 'I l h i aS t I � cG °� _ IX Y al � �,0.?F ,� x `o- ..,,,11.",;,:::€-;a;r 411,..G� ":A„.4 v --4,-1.,-.. i �1 ��# Q H Q C •J,1 '.,.-\i, y 1 ‹rI.I, Mt+e e la 'if s4, a i.,i U O ' ''5.:1‘! r 4 r P ✓\,;:?' �, t#, �� v 5 � #' 'a#� I Lr a ~a i r ' iI.7 ��* -...6,4, 4mN1 # qt 12, w% c `₹ sd! q 3 r6,4 U Ifs t• it •i ,� i``,} \tag. Y?7 v 4 :i f y, t II e 47• • a {•r ! .+ 1lt; " 'C..e'�'*•�.; `r'i{-4''� slii` € "�'e. . I .�' � fr J Q a _-- ��ci r _� �Ee �'v'G'.�lbt �i ` �F psi �( • J'rS� ? � a, l t 0 #k CC ',I y ':� a �' 4 7 O � � ti �� "\y# l b # 11115777 k r .' g4.,„) . �`� ? Ili 4 1 i�.; i '.v to.Sfrj •X " ,i,�j 1. A / jk .J.. i C 1 , F ��' �iiv T4,irru -,14+ ✓r !yt 3 i,}. 4:2. 1,91'7-';'",,--) y.1, „\ 4n m_fa I sKt 5 f I..3 ,- v' . ., �� e s ° f M �.A" ireV 'iS c ., It•�LJ r �C ;;-,-,„,--k € , 7 k ; ,"�. r r.rte .:Y G [I t ` + zrt4 i"Mi.., ,yi ✓+ a . "' Sk ;-.::-'7- W a 3 iii , ;�,�; A1 f .. I": I f ..�3' , 75 1. N Y ; 1 F.4A L�L� L ''',,7,;,,;.:'`,',, ', ATy t _. * � iNVF}H5 �� h>s kIr ;,4'..,',.,,:,,,,,:,;„:1,...A1:.: .u'4. .r et .. r. Ali a,.i9�. .+>u" _.. • I cn 4975Dil 4970 CO mn0rn z O 499s Imu V mo— rn O z w 14 I z a w W IM° go N O dry^ v fV I Fly. Ocam . f P y' Y A W o 4960 2. 4Q 1"0-• CO h t 4995 CO mom'- �m m Co '�. o r N a 8 n o Ct Cr 1\. n O 4 4970 '�n co at u Q ix D 4975 � — �i O W Z —m 5 I- ) 4990 m m a� �-' 1Z 4995 ; O U O W 0 A 489 Z in ,tt Imo join 2.o$ u o U 1-- O • cool b mom bed"- V6 O O0O 4- I aim x U ` U lf) 50W R' CgVi'� ix W N 50+75 4m�j $ ' m W J W ct N • O W m b v qm0 m /,M�qp^p O h AA mvt9 F o a O % Ymp^ 1` off ec Q ~ in rot rn W W U om o = W I- -) o i o 2 w W a. 5005 CL ON W - - 4975 W c rci gin*: INo .r-- 8«O x ca .. Z � 3YWO W O kQ he r v F 0. NQ- m m — 0 C t N n m m 4� I� I CO Mi. 4 / �� 0} 4970 '49� § • "Wm en i co in sr 0 4965 2 O §e z to C.I at sr | p 6.4 a k • 2 , §, # wooj ,§ 0O 2| \ - 2 r \ lx J in D erg. ti 7 )) < § 4 4 - |, o R - 955 ■2 Crz « § �} _ 7 �tri k2 0 0 co 5000 � cn §i © ~ © P +o ° +. § k 'I \ 5005 |[ ® g / 2 Z. _ , k # #%: )2 ) } e o 0o ) Jo ; 5005 CT m A/ flliV en § 4993 - �� ■ | h § | +i - +} iu % °am in - / \ 943 ii 1 i ..L.. ) /• jN�wF"q H9f'.} 'LH 4"-. ' 6 ui r •,, • t F a ,$ t 11+ . M+ff , Pi•X pc;•. , nay �k•,'`.' Y •"� f -- .nx t i 5 2.;t.a e ye k: A w' 5 �, ` y.y o > o .;r.,t+nM;. "" .5'y< r e ` �E�y�4-Y'^j*t' SKfiWja. \`t v�'a�Y�,,�' i,�nv y p �tw.w ��aT ,�.;,�^'y, •4} R �gn{y�. * �;1 krya• s'^ hy y 1 rr'i,x. Vi','.. .•Fa ..,,,,,.',4-Spyr p A n^[+.�•rr...}�. '' �:.)r--, .8 xv K i x }$r a� 5mt�12,Y,�NI41 '^ zti r , � - a',d iK9 l .el «„ 4,f. :.t, ,$O�y itl'Zr^ 7 r�ja r XiN a 1 x 1 PHOTO # 1 .. Y •• - a ,-x ee4s RH$ f} E x P7a is °� gnu �^ sr Ei } - i r.'z�rt� ni a F'�li` r �Y rrtt . 2 v� ax �`bwy ,,' r .p s:^. '' I ,x"'^ r a'3'' + §:ar „ C• , ,43. S ,a. 5i 4 �., 'y'� 3 'a } a ty "� �� Nix �+Pr4� 6 ri xy ii Y 4N4-. L V iito " : 4 yx"5 ` ,2? K mGWh' `s`y y ¢ r Y"",-. �j'i"tltwuce'^f„", `=, , .. 3' " .�k „k.144 d4 ka�tE.£� `'�'r s , �'�w r s� i• IT: •- 1:-0 , } � 4n}tax r>�,�, �.,� sfi yy a�� a , z f i�dpyGih'Y '�r1„F'ytv��.ryr�'t y ir`➢3' 1 , h� a�,9 Vt i PHOTO # 2 MEAD EQUINOX DF.VEI,0PMENT MEAD,COLORADO EEC PROJECT No. 1072 i 58 . DECEMBER 2007 k 4 4y hr; z } 15,5vXrsk :'!! i ;ø r r`as'`t tt',, *# t s; 3' L -?.,=19.,''',1A,'7,.:,:' s sr X { w7p a ii �z. Yig"rf ,i- $ F1 1' a ' y x' Y � ppyy�,, t J J }ttt ,,,% F v.+ -, 4 6 - , e"'R4'wi? 7 5 - t"' - ItH i �' 't f t fi t y S , 'X,+nSY�.K� aXit. ' .3�ve2'tvi�'X x a..;+" . r.5 { rc n M V i W _ t" .fi • _ P ^t5 '�y"^}x } �' P;H0T0 # 3 s. 4'1 `4 s ri ``�^tv td msy� y, �Yp 4r%�.S .S n > 'd i j t S� r Y4 4<@ b1 m'3 @""44 yy #� .,u� t• 11,5'1frS--, �(,I I I het 4 pT-'q, $ { d &fly F - 51 ', t; b Q.++ ^3r 4.l 4 s n 4 Z,t ---,/,-A, �a �d"Y :$an. r"„u . }at?1 i�t:2a pt i : 1 v ? .4- 6 1� ft 4 a Pre`', `'w.�' -t': 7 :r._ a ,F l t v ,k L.k w g d �: � 1_ f I PHOTO # 4 .. „p rxrax zX,3, t.}.,� ., MEAD EQUINOX DEVELOPMENT • MEAD,COLORADO j :, . EECPROIECTNO 107215S 1;1 EEC _ DECEMBGR 2007 MEAD PLACE!TOWN CENTER MEAD,COLORADO • PROJECT NO: 1072158 , DATE: DECEMBER 2007 LOG OF BORING B-1(PIEZOMETERI RIG TYPE: CME46 SHEET 1 OF 1 WATER DEPTH FOREMAN: DG START DATE 1212112007 WHILE DRILLING None AUGER TYPE:4"CFA ► FINISH DATE 12121/2007 AFTER DRILLING WA OPT HAMMER: MANUAL SURFACE ELEV 5000.03' 1114/2000 4991.0Y SOIL DESCRIPTION _ 0 I n ou MC DD A11Mrr$ -290 SWELL �E IF EFT) (BLOWS:FT) WSW) (X) (PPEE)a,Ka,LL _-R 1%) PRESSURE %®i000 PSF VEGETATION A TOPSOIL _ — _^ 1 SANDY LEAN CLAY(CL) _ _ brown,rust 2 stiff -3 -4 CS 5 4000 18.9 106.4 37 21 59.2 <500Eef None S 1-3 CLAYSTONE/SANDSTONE/SILTS TONE 7 brown,rust _ - B moderately hard _ _ 9 CS - - _6NY1_ 9000+ 14.4 118.7 --- ---_ 10 cemented lenses 10't0 11' t 1- • 12 brown rust.gray _ _ 13 14 SS 1-5 50/7- 1 .. 11.7 BOTTOM OF BORING AT 15 d -16 1-7 18 1-0 2-0 2-1 22 23 24 2-5 26 Earth Engineering Consultants MEAD PLACE/TOWN CENTER •� MEAD,COLORADO PROJECY NO 1073169 DATE: DECEMBER 2007 LOG OF BORING 13-2(PIEZOMET£R) RIG TYPE CME46 SHEET 1 OF 1 WATER DEPTH FOREMAN: DO START DATE 12121/2007 _WHILE GRILLING _ 5004.77' AUGER TYPE: 4`CFA FINISH DATE 1212112007 AFTER DRILLING 14/A SPT HAMMER: MANUAL SURFACE ELEV 6012.27' 1114/2008 5004.4T SOIL DESCRIPTION o N au MC Do wL MTS .200 SWELL TY►[ (PEET) snows?it man 1%I (PCf) LL P1 1%) P0[831010 %01000P5 VEGETATION 6 TOPSOIL - - 1 LEAN CLAY WITH SAND(CL) _ _ brown,rust 2 medium to salt ICs —3— 6 3000 25.5 96.6 41 22 66.9 <S00psf Nom • SS -S 3 1000 27.5 HIGHLY WEATERED CLAYSTONE 6 brown,gray.rust soft 7 6 9 CS - 30 90004 16.2 111.2 CLAYSTONEISANOSTONEISILTSTONE 10 brown,rust,gray _ _ moderately tiara 11 1-2 13 1-4 SS i-s 351r 2500 25.0 18 17 18 1-9 CS - sMl' 90004 14.6 117.7 20 21 2-2 23 24 SS 2-5 .. 6.3 BOTTOM OF BORING AT 25.O - - 26 Earth Engineering Consultants MEAD PLACE/TOWN CENTER MEAD,COLORADO • PROJECT NO: 1072156 DATE: DECEMBER2007 LOG OF BORING a-3(PIEZOMETER) RIG TYPE: CM£46 SHEET 1 OF 1 WATER DEPTH FOREMAN: DO - START DATE 12/2112007_ WHILE DRILLING 500&16' AUGER TYPE: 4'CFA FINISH DATE 12/21/2001 AFTER DRILLING WA SPT HAMMER: MANUAL SURFACE ELEV 5015.16' 1114/2006 5007,06' SOIL DESCRIPTION 0 to ou Mc DO Ai/14!T7 .100 SWELL Trim (FEET) (ELOW9/FT) (F-S9 11:l I LL `-pi 1X) _ PREf6URE %®WOO PSF VEGETATION&TOPSOIL 1 SANDY LEAN CLAY(CL) _ _ brown nisi 2 medasm to SON 3 -4 CS -- - ---- ,,_ _ ------ __,_--- - - 5 1 1500 27.0--- -- - -__--- ^ 6 7 HIGHLY WEATERED CLAYSTONE _ - t:rown.grey,rust 6 soft to moderately hard - - SS 10 24 I 7500 19.6 - ------ — -.__.._— -- 11 • 12 less weathered with depth -13 -14 1 S5 - —- — . 15 --- 50/6" 0000. 14.8 114.0 .__ __ - -16 17 1-8 19 SS 20 5018' 9000+ 17.0 -- ~ 2- 1 2-2 23 2-4 SS 25 60!5.5' 16.6 • H0T70M OF BORING AT 24.5 - - 28 Earth Engineering Consultants . MEAD PLACE/TOWN CENTER MEAD,COLORADO PROJECT NO: 1072168 DATE: DECEMBER 2007 LOG OF BORING B-4)PIEZOMETER} RIG TYPE: CMEA5 SHEET 1 OF I WATER DEPTH FOREMAN: DG START DATE 12/21/2007 WHILE DRILLNG None • AUGER TYPE: 4'CFA FINISH DATE 12121!2007 _ AFTER DRILLING WA SPT HAMMER: MANUAL SURFACE ELEV 5008.57 111412008 4098.3W SOIL DESCRIPTION 0 M au MC DO A.t1MTS -mo SWELL TYPE.f EET1i (8LOWLrI) (PIP) (Y.) IPCr) LL P1 {%I PRESSOR! %�1000 PS, .�� s r - VEGETATION&TOPSOIL _ 1 SANDY LEAN CLAY(CL) — — brown.rust 2 still to very stiN _ _ calcareous deposits 3 4 10 9000. 10.9 100.8 38 24 75.9 [CS — — 7 WEATHERED CLAYSTONE/SANDSTONEJSILTSTONE _ _ brawn,rust 8 calcareous deposits -9 soft to rrloderate ly hard SS 1-0 37 9000. 15.2 _ 11 12 13 14 SS 15 3016' 9000. 16.9 BOTTOM OF BORING AT 15 O 10 1-7 18 1-9 20 2-1 22 2-3 24 • 25 2-6 Earth Engineering Consultants MEAD PLACE/TOWN CENTER MEAD,COLORADO • PROJECT NO:1072163 DATE: DECEMBER 2007 LOG OF BORING B-S(PIE2OMETER) RIO TYPE:CMFA6 SHEET 1 OF 1 WATER DEPTH FOREMANt DO START DATE 1212112007 WHILE DRILLING 4996.0 AUGER TYPE: 4'CFA FINISH DATE 1212112007 AFTER ORILUNO WA SPT HAMMER: MANUAL SURFACE ELEV 6009.03' 1/1412000 6000.23' SOIL DESCRIPTION �^ o N au MC 00 44.041111 400 SWILL 1 rm (FEET) (BWWSIFI) Inn (%) (Pent a M On PREMIUM 14 41000 PaP VEGETATION 6 TOPSOIL _ _ 1 SANDY LEAN CLAY(CL) _ _ brown 2 stdf to sort ICS — — 3 6 4000 22.0 93.9 4 SS S 2 3000 21.0 6 7 0 9 CS - - 12 9000+ 19.1 100.4 31 15 91.1 4600p61 Norse 10 WEATHERED CLAYSTONE/SANDSTONE/SILTSTONE _ _ 1111 brown.rust.gray 11 stiff to moderately hard 12 13 14 SS 15 soar — 20.5 16 lase weathered with depth 17 1S 19 CS — - 5011' 9000. 12.0 120.2 31 15 64.5 1100pa1 0.9% 20 2-1 22 2-3 2-4 SS 25 5013.6' -- 27.6 BOTTOM OF BORING AT 25.0 26 Earth Engineering Consultants MEAD PLACE!TOWN CENTER MEAD.COLORADO PROJECT NO: 1072158 DATE: DECEMBER 2007 LOG OF BORING S-8(PIE2OMETER) RIO TYPE°M45 SHEET 1 OF 1 WATER DEPTH FOREMAN: DO START DATE 1212112007 WHILE DRILUNG 4906.T AUGER TYPE: 4"CFA FINISH DATE 12/21/2007 AFTER DRILLING WA SPT HAMMER: MANUAL SURFACE ELEV 4094.77 111412008 4997.5 SOIL DESCRIPTION 0 N CU MC 00 MIMIS) d00 SWELL nrE (MEEEI (SLOssarrTI (PU) (%1 (PC)) LL A (%) PRESSURE 16 1000 PRP VEGETATION&TOPSOIL _ _ 1 LEAN CLAY WITH SAND(CLI _ brown,rust 2 stiff 3 4 CS - - 5 3000 23.7 100.9 39 21 87.4 4500p01 Non* S increase in send with depth -6 -7 -B 9 SS 10 41 90004 15.9 • WEATHERED CIAYSTONE/SANDSTONEISILTSTONE 11 brown,rust _ _ sort to moderately hard 12 13 1-4 CS — — 6016 9000. 15.5 115.9 16 18 1-7 1-8 19 SS 20 50/9" 5500 15.8 21 22 2-3 24 • 6S 25— — s018" 3000 18.9 BOTTOM OF BORING AT 25 7 26 Earth Engineering Consultants MEAD PLACE I TOWN CENTER MEAD,COLORADO PROJECT NO: 1072158 DATE: DECEMBER 2007 LOG OF BORING B-7(PIEZOMETER) RIG TYPE: CME45 SHEET 1 OF 1 WATER DEPTH FOREMAN: DG START DATE 12/21/2007 WHILE DRILLING 4981.87 AUGER TYPE 4"CFA FINISH DATE 12/2112007 AFTER DRILLING _ N/A SPT HAMMER: MANUAL SURFACE ELEV 4988.17 1!14/2008 4982.37 SOIL DESCRIPTION o N ou MC DD A-Lw11s -200 awEll {TVP! (FEET) 1DLOWS,TT) (PSF) (%1 inn LL L PRESSURE %A 1900 NSF, VEGETATION&TOPSOIL _ _ SANDY LEAN CLAY(CL) _ _ Drown 2 stiff to soft -3 4 CS — — 2 — 27.7 1 91.8 —- 5 6 7 WEATHERED CLAYSTONE/SANDSTONE _ _ brown.rust pray a sob calcareous dopos,tn -9 SS 10 17 7000 15.4 11 12 13 14 SS -15 50 9000. 18.4 ROT TOM OF BORING AT 1S Cr 1-6 17 1-8 1N t; 2-0 2-1 2-2 i I 2-3 _ _ 24 I { 25 • 2.6 Earth Engineering Consultants • MEAD PLACE/TOWN CENTER MEAD,COLORADO PROJECT NO:1072166 DATE; DECEMBER2007 LOG OF BORING Bd(PIEZOMETER) RIO TYPE: CME4S SHEET 1 OF 1_ WATER DEPTH FOREMAN: DG START DATE 12/21/2007 RILE OR]LUNG None AUGER TYPE 4"CFA FINISH DATE 12/21/2007 AFTER DRILLING _ N/A SPT HAMMER: MANUAL SURFACE ELEV 488.&47 1/14/2008 4977.1' SOIL DESCRIPTION o N DU wC DO xanrms -200 /WELL 1 TYPE (FEET IslowS+F11 man (%) (PCF) LL R CY.) PREEOURF %q toco par VEGETATION 6 TOPSOIL _ _ 1 SANDY LEAN CLAY ICLI _ _ Grown 2 soft CS — - 3 13 7500 19.4 106.5 42 26 60.6 <S00ps1 Nona 4 SS 5 7 6500. 20.4 ._._._ 6 7 CS - 21 9000• 16.7 116.0 40 22 96 2000psr 1.2% 10 • WEATHERED CLAYSTONUSANOSTONEISILTSTONE 11 brown,rust.gray - - soR to moderately hard 12 I 13 -1d SS 1-5 36/0" rt 9000. — 16.0 16 1-7 1-8 19 lass weathorad with Booth SS 2-0 5017" 7500 13.0 21 22 23 2-4 •. SS 2-6 60/10.5- 9000• 13.6 BOY TOM OF BORING AT 25.17 26 Earth Engineering Consultants MEAD PLACE I TOWN CENTER • MEAD,COLORADO PROJECT NO: 1072159 DATE: DECEMBER 2007 LOG OF BORING B-9(PIEZ0METER) RIG TYPE: CME4S SHEET 1 OF 1 WATER DEPTH FOREMAN: DG START DATE 12/21/2007 WHILE DRILLING 4991 2W AUGER TYPE: 4"CFA FINISH DATE 12/21/2007 AFTER GRILLING SPT HAMMER: MANUAL SURFACE ELEV EOOS.29' 111412000 4998.19' SOIL DESCRIPTION O M Ou MC DO A.4JMR9 -200 SWELL ITYPE (FEET) (nowarrn MET) 11.1 F) L PS (%) PRESSURE j% 1000 PST VEGETATION&TOPSOIL _ _ SANDY LEAN CLAY(CL) _ _ brown 2 stiff 3 4 CS - - 12 9000 18.9 107.1 3$ 18 63.4 <S00psf None-_ 6 8 7 WEATHERED CLAYSTONE/SANDSTONE _ _ brown.rust.gray 9 calcareous deposits soft to moderately hard SS 10 50 15.1 1-1 • 12 13 1-4 SS i-s_.r 50 9000 17.3 BOTTOM OF BORING AT 15 d 76 1-7 1-8 19 211 2-1 - - 22 23 2-4 1:1 i Earth Engineering Consultants MEAD PLACE I TOWN CENTER • MEAD,COLORADO PROJECT NO: 1072158 DATE: JANUARY 2008 LOG OF BORING B-1 D(PIEZOMETERJ RIO TYPE: CME45 SHEET 1 OF 1 WATER DEPTH FOREMAN: DG START DATE 113/2005 WHIt£DRILLING None AUGER TYPE:4"CFA __ _ FINISH DATE 1/312005 ___,AFTER DRILLING N1A SPT HAMMER: MANUAL SURFACE ELEV 4973.23' 1!1412008 4952.87 SOIL DESCRIPTION u N au MC DO A-ENAFT1 -mo DWELL _ 4 TYPE IfEET) IDLOWDIFT) (P$F1 7%7 (PCP) LL PI (%( J PRESSURE %*WOO POP VEGETATION 8 TOPSOIL _ _ SANDY LEAN CLAY(CL) - _ brown,rust 2 51(1 3 CS - - 8__ 3000 18.5 104.5 29 12 TT.B <60090! Non. 6 6 7 a 9 20 9000. 18.8 CLAYSTONEJSANDSTONEISILTSTONE SS 10- • Drown.gray.rust - - calcareous deposds 11 soft to moderately hard _ _ 12 -13 -14 SS 15 34/7.6' 9000. 15.0 —�— - RO1TOM OF BORING AT 15 7 16 -17 18 19 20 21 22 2-3 2-4 _ _ • 25 2-6 Earth Engineering Consultants MEAD PLACE I TOWN CENTER MEAD,COLORADO • PROJECT NO: 1072156 DATE: JANUARY 2006 LOG OF BORING B•11(PIEZOMETER) RIG TYPE: CME46 SHEET 1 OF 1 WATER DEPTH FOREMAN: DG START DATE 11312006 WHILE ORILUNG 4987.13 AUGER TYPE: r CFA FINISH DATE 113/2006 AFTER DRILLING WA SPT HAMMER; MANUAL SURFACE ELEV 4076.13' 111412006 4967.73' SOIL DESCRIPTION 0 R 00 MC 00 ArUISTS 4100 SWELL TWE (PEET) IK0YY91F1) (PSR 4 (%I 1PCF) Ll P1 I%1 b,„PRESSURE 501000 PRP VEGETATION&TOPSOIL — — 1 SANDY LEAN CLAY(CL) _ _ brown,rust 2 stiff to soft -3 -4 I ,.� _ _ 6 2500 24.7 95.4 8 7 B 9 3 — 26.4 99.1 10 11 •CLAYSTONE/SANDSTONEJSILTSTONE — — brown.gray.rust 12 calcareous deposits _ soft 13 14 SS 1-5 27 9000 18.4 BOTTOM OF BORING AT 15.0' 1-8 17 18 19 20 2-1 ++, 2-2 23 2-4 2-6 •28 Earth Engineering Consultants • MEAD PLACE/TOWN CENTER MEAD,COLORADO PROJECT NO: 1072166 DATE: JANUARY 2008 LOG OF BORING 8-12(PIEZOMETER) RIG TYPE:CME48 SHEET 1 OF 1 WATER DEPTH FOREMAN: DG START DATE 1/3/2908 _WHILE DRILLING 4965.2T AUGER TYPE:4`CFA FINISH DATE 1/3/2008 AFTER DRILLING WA SPY HAMMER:MANUAL SURFACE ELEV 4976.7T 1/14/2008 4968.1T SOIL DESCRIPTION 0 N 0U lac 00 A.UMfl5 -2os SWELL TYPE FEET) ietOWavFl) IPsq (%I Inn LL N 1%) PRESSURE %j1000IMF VEGETATION&TOPSOIL - _ I LEAN CLAY WITH SAND(CL) _ _ brown,rust 2 medium 3 4 CS - - 4 2000 26.3 06.4 38 20 58.1 <600 pet None 6 Increase in sand veth depth -6 e 9 CLAYSTONEISANDSTONE/SILTSTONE - - brown,rust SS 10 17 5000+ 18.5 • soil to moderately hard - - well cemented lenses i 1 - - 2 13 14 CS - 60/5" 0000' 18.4 108.4 is 1-6 1-7 less weathered with depth 18 1-9 SS 20 5W4.6" - 19.9 2-1 22 23 24 • SS 26 50/4" 4000 20.0 BOTTOM OF BORING AT 25 0 2-6 Earth Engineering Consultants MEAD PLACE/TOWN CENTER • MEAD,COLORADO • PROJECT NO: 1072158 DATE: JANUARY 2008 LOG OF BORING B•131P1EZOMETER) RIG TYPE: CME45 SHEET 1 OF 1 WATER DEPTH FOREMAN: DG START DATE 11312008 WHILE DRILLING 4994.0T AUGER TYPE: 4"CFA FINISH DATE 1/3/2008 AFTER DRILUNO N/A _ SPT HAMMER: MANUAL SURFACE ELEV 5004.sr 111412008 4993.OT SOIL DESCRIPTION D N Wl MC OO A.c.'MrI ,200 SWELL (FEE1i_(aL.OVIFT) IP$!1 (%) (PCF) LL W IX) PRESSURE %elate PSF VEGETATION&TOPSOIL - - 1 SANDY LEAN CLAY(CL) ,. brown,rust 2 shit CS - - 4 8000 15.8 106.9 3 SS 5 6 3000 2210 6 WEATHERED CLAYSTONEJSANDSTONE/SILTSTONE _ __ brown.pray.rust 7 soft a -9 SS 1-0 18 6500 23.2 11 • CLAYS TONE/SAN DSTONUS ILTS TONE 12 brown rust _ _ moderately hard 13 f , 14 SS 1-5 5019" - 19-D V BOTTOM OF BORING AT 150' 18 1- 1 18 19 2-0 21 22 23 -24 2s- 2'3 Earth Engineering Consultants • MEAD PLACE I TOWN CENTER MEAD,COLORADO PROJECT NO: 1072160 DATE: JANUARY 2004 tOG OF BORING 8.14(PIEZOMETER) RIO TYPE:CME46 SHEET 1 OF 1 WATER DEPTH FOREMAN:DG START DATE 11312000 WHILE DRILUNG None AUGER TYPE:4"CFA FINISH DATE 1/312000 AFTER DRILLING NIA SPT HAMMER MANUAL SURFACE ELEV 5007.00 1/14/2000 4994.8 SOIL DESCRIPTION o N ou wt: oo *-U 8T$ .100 SWELL TYvc (FEED 1Mo1ar71) t+en {% (PCP) Lt n t%1 PRESSURE %G1900 PO -- VEGETATION&TOPSOIL — — 1 SANDY LEAN CLAY(CL) brown.rust 2 stAlto soft _ _ organics 3 4 3 7500 10.0 101.0 s 6 -7 CLAYSTONE/SANDSTONEJSILTSTONE B brown.gray,rust — — calcareous deposits 9 sun to moderately hard CS — _ 46 9000+ 15.9 113.8 33 16 39.5 000 pet 0.3% 10 • 11 12 13 -14 SS 1-5 50 5500 15.7 BOTTOM OF BORING AT 15.0 16 1-7 10 19 20 21 22 23 2-4 • 25 2-6 Earth Engineering Consultants MEAD PLACE f TOWN CENTER MEAD,COLORADO • PROJECT NO: 1072158 DATE: JANUARY 2005 LOG OF BORING 8-15(PIEZOMETER) RIG TYPE: CME45 SHEET 1 or t WATER DEPTH FOREMAN: OG START DATE 1/3/2008 WHILE DRILLING 4971.28' AUGER TYPE:4"CFA _ FINISH DATE 1/3/2008 AFTER DRILLING _ WA SPT HAMMER: MANUAL SURFACE ELEV 4487.76' 1/14/2008 4971.75' SOIL DESCRIPTION 0 N t]Il MC 00 ALMfts -Zoo SWELL TYPE [FElTI (el Waal) (Paf} PRESUME %tPLF] ti % CA) Q 1000.5E VEGETATION A TOPSOIL _ SANDY LEAN CLAY(CL) brawn,nut 2 Mitt to very slttl _ 3 4 CS 9 9000 12.1 100.3 38 23 67.5 1200psf 1.1% 5 increase in Sand wth depth 6 7 B 9 SS 10 6 8000 17.7 WEATHERED CLAYSTONEJSANDSTONEISILTSTONE 11 • brawn,gray.rust _ soft to moderately hard 12 13 14 SS 15 38/8" 9000. 22.2 15 wotl cemented lenses 16 to 17' _ 17 18 19 CS _ 20 50/2.6" -- 18.2 toss wo anho+ed w,Ur cIepIll - 21 2-2 23 2-4 SS 2s sal" BOTTOM Of BORING AT 25.17 26 Earth Engineering Consultants . MEAD PLACE f TOWN CENTER MEAD,COLORADO PROJECT NO:1072158 DATE: JANUARY 2006 LOG OF BORING B•18(PIFZOMETER) RIG TYPE:CME46 SHEET 1 OF I WATER DEPTH FOREMAN:DG START DATE 11312008 WHILE DRILLING 4986.06' AUGER TYPE:4"CFA FINISH DATE 11312008 AFTER DRILLING WA SPT HAMMER: MANUAL SURFACE ELEV 5008.58 111412008 4994.. SOIL DESCRIPTION - 9 N 00 $10 00 AUMII% 400 IWEJL 1 rf E PWJ ieL ILF►t P6s) 110 I►cr) u. P1 Kl ►Rlawe! %•MOPS, VEGETATION 6 TOPSOIL _ — 1 SANDY LEAN CLAY(CL) _ _ brown to devi brown 2 still to soft 3 5 9000. 18.8 97.8 <600 per None 4 SS -6 2 3000 22.5 8 -7 8 CLAYSTONE/SANDSTONEISILTSTONE _ brown,rust gray 9 soft to moderately hard CS - _ 30111" 9OOO 10.2 109.6 10 • 11 1-2 13 1-4 SS 1-6 5O111' - 18.6 1-6 17 1-8 19 GS 20 6019.6' — 11.2 less weathered with depth _ _ 21 22 23 2-4 • SS 2$ 50110' 9OOO* 18.9 BOTTOM OF BORING AT 25.0' 26 Earth Engineering Consultants MEAD PLACE/TOWN CENTER MEAD,COLORADO • PROJECT NO:1072155 DATE: JANUARY 2008 LOG OF BORING 8-17{PIEZOMETER) RIG TYPE: CME45 SHEET 1 OF 1 WATER DEPTH FOREMAN: DG START DATE 1/312005 WHILE DRILLING AUGER TYPE 4"CFA FINISH DATE 11312005 AFTER DRILLING N/A SPT HAMMER: MANUAL SURFACE ELEV 4981-36' 1/14/2008 4970.56' SOIL DESCRIPTION 0 N QU MC Uo A-LIMITS _ mo swat. f TYPE [PEETI ISLOWsrrO) {'Sr) (%I IPCF) LL PI t t% PRESSURE %e1000 PSF VEGETATION 8 TOPSOIL - - SANDY LEAN CLAY(CO Crown to dark brown 2 sal/ organics -3 4 CS - - - --- - --. .--- - . 6 6 9000• 17.9 104.7 6 7 CLAYSTONE/SANOSTONEISILTSTONE -9 brown,rust,gray - - softtomoderatelyhard SS 10 23 9000. 15.9 f 1- • 12 13 1-4 CS - - _ -- —— M 16 50/8" 9000. 14.2 119.5 38 18 520 1200 psf 0.4% 16 1-r less woatnered with depth 1-6 19 SS 20 sour 9000+ 14.4 - I --Y----- -- —_ — --- 21 2-2 2-3 24 SS 25 50/10" 9000. 14,1 BOTTOM OF BORING AT 25.v 28 Earth Engineering Consultants • MEAD PLACE/TOWN CENTER MEAD,COLORADO PROJECT NO:1072166 DATE: JANUARY 2008 LOG OF BORING B•16(PIEZOM£TER) RIG TYPE: CME46 SHEET 1 OF 1 WATER DEPTH FOREMAN: DG START DATE 114/2008 WHILE DRILLING 4972.64' AUGER TYPE: 4"CFA FINISH DATE 114/2005 AFTER DRILLING WA SPT HAMMER: MANUAL SURFACE ELEV 4982.54' 1114/2008 4974.94' SOIL DESCRIPTION 0 5 Ou MC DO MANTIS -100 SWELL TrYTD IrEE1) IBLOWS/F11 IP$11 (16) IPCF) u. (%1 ►RESSVR! %•1000►!! VEGETATION&TOPSOIL - - SANDY LEAN CLAY(CL) - - brown 2 still CS — — — calcareous deposits 3 12 6600 26.2 94.0 33 16 76.4 900 per 0.3% 4 SS 6 4 3000 24.1 6 7 6 9 CLAYSTONEISANDSTONEISILTSTONE _ — gown.rust.gray SS 10 15 7000 20.1 • soft to moderately herd — it 12 1-3 14 CS — 13 $0/8" 9000 19.4 104.3 NL NP 32.7 c600 pef None 16 1-7 1-8 I less weathered with depth 19 SS 20 60/0" 9000 23.3 21 • 22 23 24 . SS 25 50/1" 3500 21.5 • BOTTOM OF BORING AT 25.0' - - 26 Earth Engineering Consultants MEAD PLACE I TOWN CENTER • MEAD,COLORADO • PROJECT NO: 1072155 DATE: JANUARY 2008 LOG OF BORING 8.19(PIEZOMETER) RIO TYPE: CME46 SHEET 1 OF 1 WATER DEPTH FOREMAN: DG START DATE 1/44008 WHILE DRILLING None _ AUGER TYPE: 4"CFA FINISH DATE 1142008 AFTER DRILLING SPTHAMMER: MANUAL SURFACE ELEV 5013.29' 1/142008 500179' SOIL DESCRIPTION 0 N oU MC 00 A.UWT9 .200 META TYPE {FEET) (aLOWWOF1) (PM 1%) IPCF) LL P1 tx) PRESSURE %11000 PET - s'---+0 VEGETATION 5 10PSOIL SANDY LEAN CLAY(CL) -. _ Or own 2 Off organics,cal;aceoLs -3 4 [CS 4 2600 27_8 920 39 22 81.2 <500 Pal None 5 6 7 8 CLAYSTONE/SANOSTONEISILTSTONE _ brown,gray.rust 9 soft 10 moderately hard _ _ SS 10 so 6500 _ 20.5 _11_ 12 1-3 1-4 SS 1-s 50/4" 6500 15.0 BOTTOM OF BORING AT 15.0' 16 11 18 -19 20 21 22 2-3 2-4 1::1 • Earth Engineering Consultants • MEAD PLACE/TOWN CENTER MEAD,COLORADO PROJECT NO: 1072158 DATE: JANUARY 2068 LOG OF BORING 8.20(PIEZOMETER) RIG TYPE: CME45 SHEET 1 OF 1 WATER DEPTH FOREMAN: DG START DATE 114/2008 WHILE DRILLING Nona AUGER TYPE: 4`CFA FINISH DATE 114/2005 AFTER DRILUNG WA SPT HAMMER: MANUAL SURFACE ELEV 4973.48• 1114/2008 4952.08' SOIL DESCRIPTION o N ou MC O0 Ainrrs .200 _ SWILL TYPE IFE En KM Mon (641 P'DP) LL N 1%) FRESSURI II 1000 POP VEGETATION 3 TOPSOIL _ _ t SANDY LEAN CLAY(CL) - - brown to dark brown 2 MAI to very stilt - - C81Caeous 3 4 CS - - 29 9000 16.7 111.0 a -6 7 -9 4 gray SS 1-0 16 6500 - 25.9 • S1Y 12 13 14 WEATHERED CLAYSTONEISANDSTONE/SILTSTO _ brown,gray.rust SS 15 30 7500 22.0 soft BOTTOM OF BORING AT 15.0• 16 17 -1D 19 20 2-1 2-2 23 24 • -26 26 Earth Engineering Consultants MEAD PLACE I TOWN CENTER MEAD,COLORADO • PROJECT NO: 1072158 DATE: JANUARY 2005 LOG OF BORING B-21(PIEZOMETER) RIG TYPE: CME45 SHEET 1 OF 1 _ .WATER DEPTH FOREMAN: DO START DATE 11812008 WHILE DRILUNG , 49&6.66' AUGER TYPE: 4"CFA FINISH DATE 116/2008 AFTER DRIWNG 14.6' SPTHAMMER: MANUAL SURFACE ELEV 4977.65' 1/1412009 4966,35' SOIL DESCRIPTION D N 0(1 ( DD A-UM(TS 200 iWELL TYPE DE ET) IIUDWBrfl) IPSO 1 (PCF) U. P1 (K) PRTZSURE % 1009 PSP TOPSOIL A VEGETATION - - 1 SANDY LEAN CLAY(CL) _ _. txown 2 ma to soft 3 CS 5 6 6 -7 0 9 SS 10 2 S CLAYSTONE/SANDSTONE ISILTSTONE 12 brown/prey/ru4t — _ soft to moderately hard 13 1-4 SS 16 31 • IS 17 16 1-9 SS 2-0 ED 2-1 I' 22 2-3 2-4 --- SS 25 50/6.6'__ - --- - - BOTTOM OF 9ORINC AT 25.5' 29 Earth Engineering Consultants SWELL/ CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS •' Material Description: Sandy Lean Clay(CL) Sample Location: Boring 1, Sample 1, Depth 4' Liquid Limit: 37 IPlasticity Index: 21 1% Passing#200: 59.2% Beginning Moisture: 18.9% Dry Density: 106.4 psf 'Ending Moisture: 20.1% Swell Pressure: <1000 psf %Swell @ 1000: None 10.0 - i 80 6.0 4,0 C 20 . d J00 •, '6 Water Added -2,0 .;. -4.0 o , _- to C I O V -8,0 I 1 -10.0 1 0.01 0.1 1 10 Load (TSF) Project: Mead Place/Town Center • Mead, Colorado Project#: 1072158 Date: January 2008 SWELL! CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS Material Description: Lean Clay with Sand(CL) • Sample Location: Boring 2, Sample 1, Depth 2' Liquid Limit: 41 Plasticity Index: 22 % Passing#200: 88.9% Beginning Moisture: 25.5% Dry Density: 98.8 psf 'Ending Moisture: 24.7% Swell Pressure: <1000 psf % Swell @ 1000: None 10.0 — 8.0 6.0 4.0 '-- « 2.0 E pm, Water Added •2.0 O v -6.0 U -8.0 -10.0 0.01 0.1 1 10 Load(TSF) Project: Mead Place!Town Center - Mead, Colorado • Project#: 1072156 Date: January 2008 SWELL/CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS Material Description: Sandy Lean Clay(CL) Sample Location: Boring 5, Sample 3, Depth 9' Liquid Limit: 31 Plasticity Index: 15 % Passing#200: 61.1% Beginning Moisture: 19.1% Dry Density: 108.4 psf iEnding Moisture: 20.2% Swell Pressure: <1000 psf % Swell @ 1000: None 10.0 8.0 6.0 . 13 N 4.0 2.0 m E cp Ill co P ._ Water Added -2.0 .- -4.0 - -._.._ ._. ..... .. __.. .:. _._.- . c 0 a . -10.0 !_ _ 0.01 0.1 1 10 Load(TSF) Project: Mead Place/Town Center Mead, Colorado EEC C Project#: 1072158 G Date: January 2008 SWELL/ CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS Material Description: Sandy Lean Clay (CL) • Sample Location: Boring 5, Sample 5, Depth 19' Liquid Limit: 31 Plasticity Index: 15 I% Passing#200: 64.8% _ Beginning Moisture: 12.0% Dry Density: 120.2 psf 'Ending Moisture: 17.9% _ Swell Pressure: 1800 psf %Swell @ 1000: 0.9% 10.0 8.0 6.0 w 4.0 -.. __. . . ., 2.0 c m d f 0.0 - . . . . ._ .. __ . --_.: . . • c d d o. -2.0 Water Added! -4.0 O a O • -10.0 0.01 0.1 1 10 Load(TSF) Project: Mead Place/Town Center Mead, Colorado t E CG C • Project#: 1072158 Date: January 2008 _ SWELL/CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS • Material Description: Lean Clay with Sand (CL) Sample Location: Boring 6, Sample 1, Depth 4' Liquid Limit: 39 Plasticity Index: 21 % Passing#200: 87.4% Beginning Moisture: 23.7% Dry Density: 100.9 psf 'Ending Moisture: 23.4% Swell Pressure: <1000 psf % Swell @ 1000: None 10.D 6.0 - .._ . .. .__ ..:._,. _-_ Ti to ' « 2.0 c • E f0.0 .------"-------__.______7N , 0 u m °' -20 _...:. , _ Water Added -. -4.0 c Ti h c o -8.0 --. _ -10.0 ----- 0.01 0.1 1 10 Load(TSF) Project: Mead Place/Town Center • Mead, Colorado E E C Project tt: 1072158 G Date: January 2008 SWELL I CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS • Material Description: Sandy Lean Clay(CL) Sample Location: Boring 8, Sample 1, Depth 2' Liquid Limit: 42 'Plasticity Index: 25 % Passing#200: 80.6% Beginning Moisture: 19.4% Dry Density: 106.5 psf 'Ending Moisture: 21.2% Swell Pressure: <1000 psf %Swell @ 1000: None 10.0 . 8.0 6.0 ._ m 4.0 e 20 - m m f 0.0 e a - - -- Water Added a 2.0 -4.0 -10.0 0.01 0.1 1 10 Load(TSF) Project: Mead Place/Town Center Mead, Colorado Project#: 1072158 Date: January 2008 SWELL/CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS Material Description: Lean Clay(CL) Sample Location: Boring 8, Sample 3, Depth 9' Liquid Limit: 40 !Plasticity Index: 22 I% Passing#200: 96.0% Beginning Moisture: 15.7% Dry Density: 116 psf 'Ending Moisture: 17.4% Swell Pressure: 2000 psf %Swell @ 1000: 1.2% 10.0 — 6.0 73 4.0 c 2.0• E ' f 0.0 m m a WaterAdded 20 -4.0 to C U -8.0 -10.0 0.01 0.1 1 10 Load(TSF) Project: Mead Place/Town Center • Mead, Colorado Project#: 1072158 Date: January 2008 SWELL/ CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS Material Description: Sandy Lean Clay (CL) • Sample Location: Boring 9, Sample 1, Depth 4' Liquid Limit: 38 Plasticity Index: 18 % Passing#200: 53.4% Beginning Moisture: 18.8% Dry Density: 107.1 psf lEnding Moisture: 19.5% Swell Pressure: <1000 psf %Swell @ 1000: None 10.0 -_- 8.0 6.0 v 40 c 0 E f 0.0 7. n Water Added 2.0 : -4.0 0 o32 : I -8.0 -10.0 0.01 0.1 1 10 Load(TSF) Project: Mead Place I Town Center Mead, Colorado EEC . Project#: 1072158 G Date: January 2008 SWELL/CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS Material Description: Brown/Rust Sandy Lean Clay Sample Location: Boring 10, Sample 1, Depth 4' Liquid Limit 29 Plasticity Index: 12 % Passing#200: 77.8% Beginning Moisture: 20.8% Dry Density: 102.4 psf f Ending Moisture: 21.2% Swell Pressure: <1000 psf %Swell @ 1000: None 10.0 8.0 . 6.0 in 4.0 - 2.0 • u -2.0 Water Added -4 0 c o v -6.0 • o N C U -8.0 . 10.0 ' 0.01 0.1 1 10 Load(TSF) Project: Mead Place/Town Center Mead,Project#: 1072158 II E E E C • Date: January 2008 SWELL/ CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS Material Description: Brown/Rust Lean Clay with Sand • Sample Location: Boring 12, Sample 1, Depth 4' Liquid Limit: 36 Plasticity Index: 20 % Passing#200: 88.1% Beginning Moisture: 25.2% Dry Density: 100.2 psf 'Ending Moisture: 23.9% Swell Pressure: <1000 psf % Swell @ 1000: None 10.0 8.0 6.0 m cn 40 -. c 2.0 m E 2.0 . ..Water Added... -4.0 03 U -8.0 ! ., -10.0 0.01 0.1 1 10 Load (TSF) Project: Mead Place/Town Center Mead, Colorado GC E C • Project#: 1072158 Date: January 2008 SWELL/CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS ' Material Description: Brown/Gray/Rust Claystone/Sandstone/Siltstone Sample Location: Boring 14, Sample 2, Depth 9' Liquid Limit: 33 Plasticity Index: 16 % Passing#200: 39.5% Beginning Moisture: 15.1% Dry Density: 112.6 psf lEnding Moisture: 17.5% Swell Pressure: 1200 psf %Swell @ 1000: 0.3% 10.0 8.0 6.0 . a- 4.0 C 2.0 . _ a, • a -2.0 -Water Added -4 0 O o -8.0 -10.0 0.01 0.1 1 10 Load(TSF) Project: Mead Place/Town Center Mead, Colorado E E C Project#: 1072158 Date: January 2008 SWELL/ CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS j Material Description: Brown/Rust Lean Clay with Sand III , , Sample Location: Boring 15, Sample 1, Depth 4' Liquid Limit: 38 Plasticity Index: 23 % Passing#200: 67.5% Beginning Moisture: 11.3% 'Dry Density: 99.2 psf 'Ending Moisture: 24.8% Swell Pressure: 1500 psf % Swell @ 1000: 0.8% 10.0 , _. ------7-----7-T _ - --- .-,._._.._..._... ..- , i . i jI i . $.0 i• a : I i• i 3 , I I I r_._._. _ ._.. ............... : is :. I • III C I I• i i , i :Water Added o. . • . —4.0 —_...._...__..._:.. . ... . ...... ..... —__ _ _ .9 i . j i H-_j 32 I o I I I I i I ` I i I [ , I !I U l i ; I i t � i •• i ii - : I , i : iI • I -10.0 I' I f _ .. 0.01 0.1 1 10 Load(TSF) Project: Mead Place/Town Center _ r Mead,Colorado EEC _ • Project#: 1072158 Date: January 2008 ,..,. SWELL/CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS ll Material Description: Brown/Dark Brown Sandy L can Clay Sample Location: Boring 16, Sample 1, Depth 2' Liquid Limit: 'Plasticity Index: 1%Passing#200: Beginning Moisture: 18.5% Dry Density: 104.8 psf ,Ending Moisture: 20.6% Swell Pressure: <1000 psf %Swell @ 1000: None 10.0 .. ----.---.._... c : ; .I. .j Ij ! I 1 i I I ' 8 Q • -- �__ t i __ , . I i • I I f I . 2.Q ; : • m c iWater Added I I I I : ; : : -4.0 i _ _..._. - • - C ti i ; t i j c I I i 1 O ; i i • C..) , i S ! • i i f i i! i i I . -8.0 .-..._.._..__....-..1__._ _:....._...... __..._. ,.--4-..-• -..-_....._a.---1----- 1I Ir•-10.0 l l LI � `.......- .... 0.01 0.1 1 10 Load(1SF) Project: Mead Place/Town Center III _ Mead, Colorado ;' E E ', Project#: 1072158 Date: January 2008 "__ �z SWELL/CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS Material Description: Brown I Rust/Gray Claystone/Sandstone/Siltstone • Sample Location: Boring 17, Sample 3, Depth 14' Liquid Limit: 36 Plasticity Index: 16 % Passing#200: 52.0% Beginning Moisture: 14.2% Dry Density: 119.6 psf 'Ending Moisture: 3.1% Swell Pressure: 1400 psf % Swell @ 1000: 0.3% 10.0 8.0 6.0 _ ._ _ . - - - _----. . . 4.0 c 2.0 . m • m Water Added a -2 0 -40 c to O a -6.0 U -10.0 0.01 0.1 1 10 Load(TSF) Project: Mead Place/Town Center Mead, Colorado • Project#: 1072158 Date: January 2008 SWELL /CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS • Material Description: Brown Sandy Lean Clay Sample Location: Boring 18, Sample 1, Depth 2' Liquid Limit: 33 Plasticity Index: 18 I% Passing#200: 76.4% Beginning Moisture: 24.5% Dry Density: 98.9 psf !Ending Moisture: 26.1% Swell Pressure: 1100 psf % Swell @ 1000: 0.1% 1 8.0 60 . _ m 4.0 . _ c 2.0 • d Water Added -2.0 , -4.0 c • o o U -8.0 0,01 0.1 1 10 Load(TSF) Project: Mead Place/Town Center 41 Mead, Colorado r E c Project#: 1072158 Date: January 2008 SWELL/ CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS Material Description: Brown/Rust I Gray Claystone I Sandstone/Siltstone • Sample Location: Boring 18, Sample 4, Depth 14' Liquid Limit: NL Plasticity Index: NP % Passing#200: 323% Beginning Moisture: 21.0% Dry Density: 104.2 psf 'Ending Moisture: 22.7% Swell Pressure: <1000 psf % Swell @ 1000: None 10.0 8.0 . 6.0 o 4.0 2.0 G m E •f 00 aWater Added -2.0 -4.0 : 0 6.0 j N C 0 U 8.0 -10.0 0.01 0.1 1 10 Load(TSF) Project: Mead Place/Town Center Mead, Colorado E EC Project#: 1072158 Date: January 2008 • SWELL / CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS Material Description: Brown Sandy Lean Clay Sample Location: Boring 19, Sample 1, Depth 14' Liquid Limit: 39 Plasticity Index: 22 % Passing#200: 61.2% Beginning Moisture: 24.1% Dry Density: 97.9 psf 'Ending Moisture: 22.6% Swell Pressure: <1000 psf %Swell @ 1000: None 10.0 8.0 60 4.0 2.0 C i E 0.0 !. m Water Added C a -8.0 -100 -_ 0.01 0.1 1 10 Load (TSF) Project: Mead Place/Town Center • Mead, Colorado EE C Project#: 1072158 ,,r Date: January 2008 PRELIMINARY DRAINAGE REPORT FOR EQUINOX PLANNING AREAS 1 -6 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT MEAD, COLORADO Prepared for: EQUINOX MEAD,LLC c/o Roger Hollard • 9055 E Mineral Circle#100 Centennial, CO 80112 Prepared by: TETRA TECH 1900 South Sunset Street, Suite 1-F Longmont, Colorado 80501 Tetra Tech RMC Job No. 133-26064.08001 Initial Submittal: March 25, 2008 Revised Submittal: May 9, 2008 Final Submittal: July 17, 2008 [it TETRA TECH • 0 TETRA TECH July 17, 2008 Mr. Dan J. Dean Town Manager 441 Third Street P.O. Box 626 Mead, CO 80542 Re: Preliminary Drainage Report for Equinox Planning Areas 1-6 PUD (formerly submitted as Mead Town Center) Revised per Town comments Tetra Tech Job No.: 133-26064.08001 Dear Mr. Dean: Tetra Tech, on behalf of Equinox Mead LLC, is submitting this revised Preliminary Drainage Report for Equinox Planning Areas 1-6 Planned Unit Development(PUD) for your review. The proposed site is located at the northeast corner of Weld County Road 7 • and State Highway No. 66. Proposed development of the site will consist of residential housing in the northern portion of the project and a mixed-use commercial development in the southern portion of the project. This report addresses the Town's review comments, dated April 17 and June 30, 2008, for the initial submittal of the annexation and rezoning application for Equinox Planning Areas 1-6 PUD dated March 25, 2008. If you have any questions or comments concerning this report, please feel free to contact us at 303-772-5282. Sincerely, TETRA TECH , .:-- (a/(M -tri7 osh Sherman Cameron Fowlkes, P.E. Project Engineer Project Manager • 1900 5.Sunset Street,Suite I-F Longmont.CO 80501 Tel 303.7725282 Fax 303772.7039 wvew.tetratech.rom P:\133_26064_08001 Mead Place\Deliverables\Annexation\Prelim Drainage Report Xmittal Letter.doc Eli TETRA TECH ENGINEER'S CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that this design for the Preliminary Drainage Report for Equinox Planning Areas 1-6 Planned Unit Development was prepared by me (or under my direct supervision) in accordance with the provisions of the "Town of Mead Storm Drainage Criteria and Construction Standards, January, 1998" for the owners thereof. 0 LICE,y`��• 6 c: \` .EE 0.. rl r•. f / 9318 ' ei� Cam:. 6p., Fowlkei...4"j; Regist• 64y.'. i ngineer State of : ' .•-:'39318 • • P:\133_26064_08001 Mead Place\Deliverables\Annexation\Prelim Drainage Report Xmittal Letter.doc TABLE OF CONTENTS • Page 1.0 Introduction 1 2.0 Intent 1 3.0 Design Reference 1 4.0 Existing Drainage Characteristics 2 5.0 Developed Drainage Characteristics 2 6.0 Conclusion 3 7.0 References 4 Appendices Vicinity Map and FIRM A • Historic and Developed Runoff Calculations B Preliminary Detention Pond Design C Storm Drainage Master Plan Back Pocket Historic Drainage Plan Back Pocket Preliminary Drainage Plan Back Pocket • . - i - PRELIMINARY DRAINAGE REPORT • EQUINOX PA'S 1-6 PUD MEAD, COLORADO 1.0 INTRODUCTION The Equinox PA's 1-6 PUD project consists of several parcels of land located in the Southwest Quarter of Section 22 and the Northwest Quarter of Section 27, Township 3 North, Range 68 West of the 6th Principal Meridian, County of Weld, State of Colorado. Properties within the proposed development include: the Schmidt-Hurt parcel, the Schmidt-Debrine parcel, the Wulf parcel, and the Chansler parcel. The proposed development is bound by the Hunter's Cove subdivision to the north,Mulligan Reservoir and agricultural land to the east, State Highway No. (SH) 66 to the south and Weld County Road (WCR) 7 to the west; also included is a parcel of land directly south of SH 66 and east of WCR 7. The proposed project is approximately 113 acres which includes residential zoning in the northern portion of the development and a commercial/mixed use component in the southern portion of the project. The included property that is south of SH 66 is primarily encumbered by the Highland Ditch and is planned to remain as undeveloped open space. The proposed development will consist of single family homes, general commercial, village mixed use, streets, utilities, existing gas wells, open space, detention ponds and landscaping. Access to the site will be provided from State Highway No. 66 as well as Weld County Road 7. • A Vicinity Map has been included in Appendix A of this report. 2.0 INTENT The intent of this report is to provide a preliminary storm drainage study for the proposed Equinox planned unit development. This report examines the historic drainage patterns for the subject properties and provides a preliminary design for the developed runoff. The drainage design for developed flows generated from the proposed development is intended to not adversely impact to the historic local and regional drainage patterns. 3.0 DESIGN REFERENCE The drainage design criteria were taken from the "Town of Mead Storm Drainage Criteria and Construction Standards, January, 1998." All drainage basins were less than 90-acres in size; therefore, runoff rates were calculated using the Rational Method. The values for runoff coefficients, C, were taken from the "Urban Storm Drainage Criteria Manual Vol. 1, June, 2001 " for the appropriate hydrologic soils group. Rainfall intensities, I, were taken from the "Town of Mead Storm Drainage Criteria and Construction Standards, January, 1998."for the anticipated future land use. The 2-year event and the 10-year event were used for calculations involving the minor storm, and the 100-year event was used for calculations involving the major storm. Detention volumes were sized to detain the 100-year developed flow rates and treat onsite runoff for water quality purposes before discharging at the 10-year historic release rate. The • - 1 - "Drainage Master Plan, July, 1998" for the Town of Mead, Colorado, was also referenced for • historical drainage flow rates and patterns. 4.0 EXISTING DRAINAGE CHARACTERISTICS The subject properties presently consist of agricultural farmland with associated homesteads and farm buildings. Per the Town of Mead "Drainage Master Plan, "the Equinox PUD is within the Foster Reservoir Drainage Basin and the Mulligan Lake Basin. More specifically, the southern portion of the proposed project is within Sub-basin 102 of the Foster Reservoir Basin and the northern portion is within Sub-basin 103 of the Mulligan Lake Basin. Runoff from the proposed project within Sub-basin 102 sheet flows from west to east before being collected and passed under SH 66 to the south. Ultimately, runoff from Sub-basin 102 discharges into Foster Lake and then St. Vrain Creek. Runoff from the proposed project within Sub-basin 103 sheet flows from the southwest to the northeast and discharges into Mulligan Reservoir. According to the "Drainage Master Plan, "Mulligan Reservoir is adequately sized to detain the historic 100-year release of storm water runoff from Sub-basin 103. However,no formal detention agreement is in place with the owner's of the Reservoir. The Storm Drainage Master Plan has been included in the back pocket of this report. For the purposes of this report,historic drainage basins for the proposed development have been further subdivided. Aerial topography in conjunction with site investigation was used for basin delineation. Offsite drainage basins, O1 and O2, are parcels included in the afore mentioned Sub-basins, but the parcels are not within the proposed development's boundary. Basins H1 • through H3 include the parcels of land that will be included within the project's boundary. The Historic Drainage Plan has been provided in the back pocket of this report. According to the "Soil Survey of Weld County, Colorado, Southern Part"the subject site predominately consists of Wiley-Colby complex, 1 to 3 percent slopes. Based on USGS mapping, the site has considerably less slope than indicated in the soil survey. Leveling of the ground surface is likely a result of farming practices. The soil survey states the following about the Wiley-Colby soils, "Permeability is moderately slow. Surface runoff is medium, and the erosion hazard is moderate." Wiley-Colby soils are classified as a hydrologic soil group B. The proposed project is adjacent to a FEMA designated floodplain for Mulligan Reservoir. The floodplain is designated as Zone A. No base flood elevation is determined for this floodplain and the horizontal delineation for this floodplain is approximate. All proposed development for the Equinox project will be out of the Mulligan Reservoir floodplain. FIRM Panel 850 has been included in Appendix A of this report. 5.0 DEVELOPED DRAINAGE CHARACTERISTICS The site plan for the proposed development is conceptual at this time. As a result, the developed drainage design is also conceptual in nature. The site was divided into five basins (Al thru A4, and B1) based on land use and the historic drainage patterns. Developed runoff generated from Basins Al thru A4 will be directed through the development's storm infrastructure system before • being detained, treated for storm water quality and discharged at the 10-year historic release rate. - 2 - Detained storm water discharge from Basins A will be directed to Mulligan Reservoir. Runoff • from developed Basin B1 will also be directed through the development's storm sewer system before being detained, treated for storm water quality and discharged at the 10-year historic release rate. Detained runoff from Basin BI will be discharged to the east and then ultimately directed south under SH 66 via existing culverts. Drainage Basins Al thru A4, and B1 are labeled on the enclosed Preliminary Drainage Plan. Offsite basins, O1 and O2, will follow historic drainage patterns. These offsite flows will be routed through the proposed development. Offsite runoff from Basins O1 and O2 will either be routed separately through the proposed site and release directly into Mulligan Reservoir, or the offsite runoff may be combined in the proposed drainage system and conveyed through the proposed detention pond(s) before being released to Mulligan Reservoir. Routing of offsite flows will be further evaluated once a site plan in more defined. Basins O1 and O2 are labeled on the enclosed Preliminary Drainage Plan. Although the future development intends to provide detention basins for the project, the developer may proceed with discussions with the owner's of Mulligan Reservoir to better understand the potential for detaining developed storm water runoff from Basins Al thru A4 within the Reservoir. The parcel of land south of SH 66, which is included in the project boundary, is primarily encumbered by the Highland Ditch and is planned to remain as undeveloped open space. Therefore, no drainage calculations have been performed for this parcel. This parcel is labeled • on the enclosed Preliminary Drainage Plan. 6.0 CONCLUSION In conclusion, the intent of the proposed drainage study for The Equinox Planning Areas 1-6 Planned Unit Development is to provide a preliminary drainage design that will not adversely affect the existing drainage facilities or drainage patterns surrounding the site. The Town of Mead "Drainage Master Plan, July, 1998"was referenced while evaluating the existing drainage patterns and proposed drainage improvements. The preliminary drainage design for the proposed project complies with the"Town of Mead Storm Drainage Criteria and Construction Standards, January, 1998. " A copy of the Storm Drainage Master Plan for the Town of Mead, Historic Drainage Plan, Preliminary Drainage Plan, runoff calculations, and detention calculations are included for your review. • - 3 - • 7.0 REFERENCES 1. Sear-Brown Group, The. Drainage Master Plan, July 1998, Town of Mead. 2. Town of Mead Standard Design Criteria and Construction Requirements, January 1998. 3. Town of Mead Storm Drainage Criteria and Construction Standards,January 1998. 4. United States Department of Agriculture, et. all. Soil Survey of Weld County, Colorado, Southern Part, September 1980. 5. Urban Storm Drainage Criteria Manual, Vol. 1 —3, June 2001. • • - 4 - APPENDIX A Vicinity Map and FIRM EQUINOX ANNEXATION AND REZONING PA's 1 -6 PUD / _It �� MEAD t° ��. County Rd 34 x m O id w ASIC .._4ti rill E i Dili > -7z, k 5 ULL"raN 'a i,1aTrta =;_I • -- 17/ a e Hwy 66 d o n m 0 N 28 C 27F� {t•` C- 26 a v a 1Vi m o a 3000' 1500' 0' 3000' 6000' ij § Iiiil CI) o SCALE IN FEET 2 N N Drawing Description Project No.: 133-26064-08001 el TETRA TECH Date: 17 JUL 2008 co VICINITY MAP Designed By: JJA T www.lelratech.com Drawing No. al911900S.Sunsel8treet,Sle.1-F EQUINOX LAND, LLC Longmont,Colorado 80501 PHONE:(303)772-5282 FAX:(303)772-7039 Copyright: Tetra Tech • o%CE 11- 11 / . d 'a I cs, Q a HG tooauEZo o u�o5oEi- 8 ta >11 � m e W $ES�o d m L w F. ¢ � H �0 W: it2 E T. «�gs< .� D o Z ��1 O N` N ? Q umB ulWi 0 _ �, O135 w � �y$� "'' �o 8o'3x re I o � UUJ a: sf E'g8 4. as 8 z oLLr—m §1 M _ _ _ Qa9So$ $� 08 $ A°=gE _ya aE o'er -�� in Ditch V N p' r! E - - II II El Ditch c op a t1�a4'y°� W N 2 O 4 W i.._ \_._N. co to J tt N tt O /... CC LI -- flu .? I • N. 0 o m w N N NN N • APPENDIX B Historic and Developed Runoff Calculations R d f7 1- r r N > O N E N p O p co 'n • " U ? N a) m m m co o ' co O o C 3 Ce N N c0 )O N 11:10 [7 } O O O C N I- Iti i S) 0 0 0 0) 0 t } r r r o r GC) N N N CJ N _ O J N N y } r r r m r .--- = o m C A o 0 0 n o d o 0 0 `- o 0 > CC N Co Z C O illt 8 m 8 H J J D z ✓ a u, to c « o 0 m 0 J o v m N m N P QN U it • Li- Li- O d > mom ° Z U po 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 .t ' Ce m 0 y m t U n } N N _ O 0 0 0 O O ce 2' o r E O Us- 12 I W cn en en o m d } o 0 0 o w Co o 0 0 0 0 (9 _ 'a N z Oe Q Nce a) N it in ❑ Y CJ V j K O O [p CJ N Q O O O O Q O N O ,- en o •0 a J o d U of ❑ C a.. N Y D = C N o m o) 6m V 0 a 16 U co off+ N o 0) '^ w N r- N CY d Q to c, m a) N O ' O O m To CO U Q up 25 O 6 N V d F Q ` o W >' y Q N a C C — iii =re O N 0 O N co .-N O o N O O O> N CO O d >- O O 2 9 O o ei in 6 O) N N N y N F 0 C T 2 N - V 0 O N m O o OI w ` o 3 c m • U O 0 N (n N Y 0 co r C O d m N = z s 001; m J V d' y m = ~ enl rnp ¢ 4 Q J d • HISTORIC RUNOFF CALCULATIONS Time of Concentration: Tc = Ti + Tt = {0.395 * (1.1-05) * (Li)112 } / S113 ; where length of overland flow, Li ≤ 500 ft Tt = Lt/ (60 * V) ; V = Cv * (SW)v2 C„ = 5 (per Table RO-2, USDCM V.1) Basin C5 LT S V Ti Tt T, * (ft) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (min) (min) (min) • Hi 0.09 1805 0.00194 0.22 70 99 169 H2 0.10 2285 0.00175 0.21 72 142 214 H3 0.10 832 0.0012 0.17 82 32 114 O1 0.13 277 0.0018 0.21 52 0 52 O2 0.13 1403 0.00214 0.23 65 65 131 * If T,≥60 min, use 60 min (limitation of IDF curve is 60 minutes) * If T,≤ 10 min, use 10 min (per Section RO 2.4.4, USDCM V.1) • P:\133_26064_08001 Mead Place\Deliverables\Drafts\DraftRpts\DRAINAGE\Prelim Runoff Calcs.xls O 000)0)0 N 0) } co r- n n n V co O O O O O O O O 0 F Ucla iii "' 0 CO N N N N0 O 0 O r r 0 r N 0 N} Or- r r• r N N >. 6V r r N1-• O 6 00 00000 00 O U)0)r(00 NrQ E o r 0 0 6 ON nn n 0(0 •.- y r r ' v a my °? .0 cf(O (O(O N r O 2> o R tO m r o [7 ni N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 d 0 O O (0 N V N 0 C K N O) 000 0 0 A V' O N (OO 6 V CO(7 N r N 0 0 d CO 0 r 0 (V(O m Z 00 r N 6(7 - O O >_ N CO CO N N O OCti a, N O It 6 Q d co J w J v a) m m U x o'(?�v '^ oo > r '').rn (No .- oor r.I 5 O� Lc)Q)r0 6 y a 0000[0 (hN Q E E r o 0 ET It' O 2 t LL 0 E • LL To 8 Z d (p y N r (O C▪ 0 0 0 0 O O d y to r a N m 'n r 1 C) O CO co 0) .�.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 �. N O O (O Of,- 0 0 0 0 0 0 d N 0 0 0 0 O O C O (h (7 C, (h N r r c r Ce E Q A _ d W 1° = d d cc U ¢ H ._y N- n O O N 0 00000 L- 0 6 d CO 0 C ClO Inc J U >. N O r o CC O O O O O ()N d r N - m r O - W O O O O O O 0 O O O O O r(7 ›- N N N N r C J m N U d r o U W U 2 g,9 { ❑ o Nc, O O 0 12 K r N d d 2 A 0J O N C7 O U N O) r- r N r Q) O d a N M r a w y N 100)co. O nN U E ry O)(O CON 610 d j O O a O O 0 (0 N N N O(0 rl E r r r CO to W K H a n U' r aN) O z U o m o Q r J Zre Zr O o m p t d CO ' m r 0) co N (O r t0(0 O N m CO , 0. (O V 0 co CJ d' 0 O N r co 6 N O n o CO o r p C r r W O N 0 r O w NO OO OO F-O F- C7N N r O) N �� d OhO CON N ,- - O Ei cr o m LL U `m EE zco co c 0 0 0 ' a v o o U N ry d d 0 C d N i J : J d _o C n to 0 0 U O U 9 > d CO (7 V r N CD N N O N Cl V r N d �^ v q m d d t°es, N d ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ m 00 on,,, N d ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ m 00 00 q n � x o j m > H d m > F u y a m ` „ o E E 0 P n d i 'b E 'm _Qa" x " 0 m 6 o d o o a• Q a N M O J W U K • : : o 0 • di 0 co nl a C C. No) in U r r r £ N r r r r H 41 wd r r r r r- 5 N V V V V V O 42 r r- r r 'C- Z 0 a .w • « « « O ? . « . « « • « « « « co Co O 0 0 0 0 0 a v N N N N N L J r r r r r r a � J U w Co 00 up co r -C V V V U3 M M U U ° OOOO Q O M N O U74=4 H c ONV CD b _ M r O CO cc; — 3 LL .1:3 N r r r > o • LL c o OU) C CO CO O 0 r co r--. r in. ? N Z c ~' E OCA CZJNr r N U C U _ ° o Q Q N E V I` CT CA W O W FU E co N r N N L o )n aE o O + a O C O J o as 0 W v vvv v J o O _ n II W U a) N * ~ to Q C E N O) CO CO CO C EC U £ N r '@ > 4O N ~ 2 s o m c O o N - U o -o J CO = O Q co L 0 _ — O V p c4s4 E in y $ O C() O N coO E I2 x E Q O E w E •E w L.T. E Li N Li, N + a) Cn ScE Eci) E > �N r N Cl d- r II II N N U CO QQQQm U NI U U) O U CO F- F_cue) > « . « « `+ DRAINAGE CRITERIA MANUAL (V. 1) RUNOFF ' TABLE RO-3 Recommended Percentage Imperviousness Values Land Use or Percentage Surface Characteristics Imperviousness Business: Commercial areas 95 Neighborhood areas 85 Residential: Single-family Multi-unit(detached) 60. -Multi-unit(attached) 75 Half-acre lot or larger Apartments 80 Industrial: Light areas 80 Heavy areas 90 Parks,cemeteries 5 Playgrounds . 10 Schools 50 Railroad yard areas 15 Undeveloped Areas: Historic flow analysis 2 Greenbelts, agricultural 2 Off-site flow analysis 45 (when land use not defined) III Streets: Paved 100 Gravel (packed) 40 Drive and walks 90 Roofs 90 Lawns, sandy soil 0 Lawns,clayey soil 0 *See Figures RO-3 through RO-5 for percentage imperviousness. Based in part on the data collected by the District since 1969,an empirical relationship between C and the percentage imperviousness for various storm retum periods was developed. Thus,values for C can be determined using the following equations(Urbonas, Guo and Tucker 1990). CA =KA + (1.31P — 1.44i 2 + I.135i—0.12)for CA≥0,otherwise CA=0 (RO-6) Cm =r K0 + (0.8l581' - 0.78612 +0.774i+ 0.04) (RO-7) CB =\CA + CCD)/2 in which: j i i=% imperviousness/100 expressed as a decimal(see Table RO-3) 06/2001 RO-9 Urban Drainage and.Flood Control District DRAINAGE CRITERIA MANUAL(V. 1) RUNOFF 0 90 5,000.sq.k.horses f 80 • . 14 000 sq.n borne4 r Ise / . r �o r / 3.000 sq.ft.homes . / • r • r r 60 / / _ „ r r r • o r $ so / ` • fr r 12.000 sq.n t tomes . E . • r le- l c • r a - Y ' a � �/ / ro r To . / I . / / 1 1OO / r •- r 11.000 sq.ft.homes 30 .11 a. 0." j- 20 �../ I / l 10 0 , 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 Single Family Dwelling Units per Acre FIGURE RO-3 Watershed Imperviousness, Single-Family Residential Ranch Style Houses • 06/2001 Urban Drainage and Flood Control District RO-15 DRAINAGE CRITERIA MANUAL(V. 1) RUNOFF 0 TABLE RO-5 Runoff Coefficients, C Percentage Imperviousness Type C and D NRCS Hydrologic Soil Groups 2-yr 5-yr 10-yr 25-yr 50-yr 100-yr 0% 0.04 0.15 0.25 0.37 0A4 0.50 5% 0.08 0.18 0.28 0.39 0.46 0.52 10% 0.11 0.21 0.30 0.41 0.47 0.53 15% 0.14 0.24 0.32 0.43 0.49 0.54 20% 0.17 0.26 0.34 0.44 0.50 0.55 25% 0.20 0.28 0.36 0.46 0.51 0.56 30% 0.22 0.30 0.38 0.47 0.52 0.57 • 35% 0.25 0.33 0.40 0.48 0.53 0.57 40% 0.28 0.35 0A2 0.50 0.54 0.58 45% 0.31 0.37 0A4 0.51 0.55 0.59 50% 0.34 0.40 0.46 0.53 0.57 0.60 55% 0.37 0A3 . 0.48 0.55 0.58 0.62 60% 0.41 0.46 0.51 0.57 0.60 0.63 65% 0.45 0.49 0.54 0.59 0.62 0.65 70% 0.49 0.53 0.57 0.62 0.65 0.68 75% 0.54 0.58 0.62 0.66 0.68 0.71 80% 0.60 0.63 0.66 0.70 0.72 0.74 85% 0.66 0.68 0.71 0.75 0.77 0.79 90% 0.73 0.75 0.77 0.80 0.82 0.83 95% 0.80 0.82 0.84 0.87 0.88 0.89 100% 0.89 0.90 0.92 0.94 0.95 0.96 Type B NRCS Hydrologic Soils Group 0% 0.02 0.08 0.15 0.25 0.30 0.35 5% 0.04 0.10 0.19 0.28 0.33 0.38 10% 0.06 0.14 0.22 0.31 0.36 0.40 15% 0.08 0.17 0.25 0.33 0.38 0.42 20% 0.12 0.20 0.27 0.35 0.40 0.44 25% 0.15 0.22 030 0.37 0.41 0.46 30% 0.18 0.25 0.32 0.39 0.43 0.47 35% 0.20 027 0.34 OA1 0.44 0.48 40% 0.23 0.30 0.36 0.42 0.46 0.50 45% 0.26 0.32 0.38 0.44 0A8 0.51 50% 0.29 0.35 0.40 0.46 0.49 0.52 55% 0.33 0.38 0.43 0.48 0.51 0.54 60% 0.37 0.41 0.46 0.51 0.54 0.56 65% 0.41 0.45 0.49 0.54 0.57 0.59 70% 0.45 0.49 0.53 0.58 0.60 0.62 75% 0.51 0.54 0.58 0.62 0.64 0.66 80% 0.57 0.59 0.63 0.66 0.68 0.70 85% 0.63 0.66 0.69 0.72 0.73 0.75 90% 0.71 0.73 0.75 0.78 0.80 0.81 95% 0.79 0.81 0.83 0.85 0.87 0.88 100% 0.89 0.90 0.92 0.94 0.95 0.96 Ill 06/2001 RO-11 Urban Drainage and Flood Control Distrid , re i . . . .. . „. . . .. . .. .. .. _. ._ ph. • • . • - _.,'=. Z tx. ___ __. _ ..,•____ __._ .._ . _ . _ ..„. , a,4 -- - - '_ _ _ --1; _. � — o CY_w_ _-_ : _ —:,--7-= - - — =_ CC _- —i-07-— =— � -- - ,--� _ CO - - -74-2_-.7- t):,: :-- _ _ _� C - CI LU - r- r:_ =_ T�:J z _ _:o =,_ .=; -�-- n: RIP = It - r j+t —, _ _ ---01� itF�E F N( _-Q=—L-I_�_-- _ j ' 8 _ 0 G� tF. • � .. .. . — —, Z O F- RUNOFF DRAINAGE CRITERIA MANUAL(V. 1) • L= length of overland flow(500 ft maximum for non-urban land uses, 300 ft maximum for urban f land uses) S= average basin slope (ft/ft) Equation RO-3 is adequate for distances up to 500 feet. Note that, in some urban watersheds, the overland flow time may be very small because flows quickly channelize. 2.4.2 Overland Travel Time. For catchments with overland and channelized flow,the time of concentration needs to be considered in combination with the overland travel time,t„which is calculated using the hydraulic properties of the swale, ditch,or channel. For preliminary work,the overland travel time, t,, can be estimated with the help of Figure RO-1 or the following equation(Guo 1999): V=Cvswus (RO-4) in which: V=velocity(ft/sec) C,.= conveyance coefficient(from Table RO-2) • S„,=watercourse slope(ft/ft) ( TABLE RO-2 Conveyance Coefficient, C. Type of Land Surface Conveyance Coefficient, C Heavy meadow 2.5 Tillage/field 5 Short pasture and lawns 7 Nearly bare ground 10 Grassed waterway 15 Paved areas and shallow paved swales 20 The time of concentration,tn is then the sum of the initial flow time, t,, and the travel time, t„ as per Equation RO-2. 2.4.3 First Design Point Time of Concentration in Urban Catchments. Using this procedure,the time of concentration at the first design point (i.e., initial flow time, t;) in an urbanized catchment should not exceed the time of concentration calculated using Equation RO-5. tc 180 + 10 (RO-5) I;• ,4- J i RO-6 06/2001 Urban Drainage and Flood Control District ` }n -'.�2 - `q'It` + { .c48:'04/1 3 �� f: 8g, i 6-441-) 4‘44-M,,,,-.4114,‘' _ '-;1.44-4:?-? '�S- tea ` 0- lt zf" 5 <1. 1'244 (( 82 ^✓" , t A a -88.....2,,k1O,,,"77,11 x '1''Z';t -`1r /��I-----ee-'''t1 :4 iK + ye n F +. +i - - '\ 'lt -t 1� 4.3 fi v- }.,:fr x yF� h.,s'�x'i 8z' ,z -. .,,. 3 t .�.,w " ? 10•51S"` ;£ �. x ` ; a Ct1 17 '4Y v ' d+ b it , +£ ''' `--+A�' 3 d' > ` 5k' r v`-ail • ��r _i4.4,-„a„.„..,,,.....„,,,.„4„,„&„,„,„„..„.„. & t x+ �k �tt �,� v `ri4y ` ,S,` Y £ F. of h s •, / k.�: * h r- - - h..SS ett .- . S+,eS Y S � lr ;V i ..b4 � E - 1 t W !'23+1 31+ V 15 i `' ' �- 7i�� ..r. ' S I - h 0. i �m t ;r ✓ :"z �' � e L � •<r1,0 4.4 S---,1'4-4F,34,14,15:: '� n "5 haw `,A.'3.0;,...7.2):-.±:1-"t4,:„ 3 Nt h ice? .. "`I 'P ills t3 :3 S g ` t .A ., ., 2 23 tnt d}3 ,- ti - �YWr 1 82car . 7:::::_r;:col,c-;.:44%,„„„...,..,;21.f.,%-- •';ti479 1 ',:‘1,-:--:,44` ' > 42 f kk 4. �r io `l c, - _ it x few i S .1^�' rp'* t ; • r SSrr4�+r lent •848-.2"t2)::::,.f22844---,8-4,2,8-,4 .3,'- 4QA '�;- , BORN e -tia.r t"r4 5 t` ri;t.L1 1 -_:2 ow w s o 0 • . O C C 0 O m r :E. 0 a� a O 0 0 C C a a a C i t c iii a) 0) c a) C 0 2 J r r a 0 0 0 C (p C 0 C C 0 - 0 c0 0 0 >. a) o a) = a) a) N o) > O) O) 0) N as a) a3 0) -•-•co CO CL C q C C 2 O a) a) 0 a) a) a O- Z U IX V c O 0 0 c N c a) >, 0 >, N >. T O a as O- 'C a t a _ a) a3 '� Tom ma m a 0 O E J E o E O E O .� J (n (n a (n a (n a 0 i O 2 O 0 O O O O m -0 - a." I CO E E 7 a • c N C• O N a3 a3 u) a3 n Y Y Y m Cl) -O N a) 'O a C N N N a) ® C a) N C F- m 0 O L 30 0 30 O L O p n a CO t m o a c w N N a O L Z a m O co a) V (n O a a C w O O o O c2 N Cl) V) U N r a) a) oO a C a C a O N U U o co 0 r m o a) '5 . C >. 6 o a a) C m "" CO W U : w N 0 0 N U a d a N , M M Q a 0' E E O o 9 N ra U Q CO O , O a o >, O m Q >, a m 5 C o U a as w a) cn E o c a a o o a a) —_ O z c z 0 6 d • U o CO OI a) co O N U) 0) N a) m c0 h coa d U) V V APPENDIX C Preliminary Detention Pond Design • DETENTION POND SUMMARY The percent imperviousness in the following spreadsheets was estimated for each Basin based on the proposed land use. The percent imperviousness will be revised for the Final Drainage Report. Pond Storage Qout (100-yr) (ac-ft) (cfs) Basin Al 2.83 9.06 Basin A2 3.03 6.47 Basin A3 3.48 7.43 Basin A4 2.12 4.52 Basin B1 2.36 5.04 Total 13.82 32.52 Check: Qout (100-yr dev.) ≤ Qout (10-yr hist.) Basin A1+A2+A3+A4 = 27.48 cfs≤ Basin H1+H2 = 27.60 cfs Basin B1 = 5.04 cfs ≤ Basin H3 = 7.20 cfs • • P:\133_26064_08001 Mead Place\Deliverables\Drafts\DraftRpts\DRAINAGE\Det Pond Summary.xls � F}tt DEtEWitaFt,i/OCUME tWi:11 b iED•FAA M Yt OD. •...?,Y,-,''1,•,', (see t75DM voltilil8'•.....,...ilage Cha to lle•scriptioh of 44tiodj ,1j r -......::::,402,4-:,..V,,.,...- :::. Project: Mead Town Center III Basin ID:Developed Basin Al (For catchments less than 160 acres only. For larger catchments,use hydrograph routing method) (NOTE:for catchments larger than 90 acres,CUHP hydrograph and routing are recommended} . • #may 1.. DetetmtnaUon of MINOR Detention Votume using Mod)fiedYM Method .` ' nation of MAID tr;tng /t•• , De6lgnjnformation(Input Deslan Information IInpM1j Catchment Oraimpe Irropennousnsur I.-l`',?;'9.00', 2.Pane 4 CJIWYwt 6.i,ap.Imperviousness I,• 50.00 panne Celdcnerd DreL,.ve A . A-'•:131.230':'^rues Celchwere L1o.ape her A• 3i 230 arm Pmed.velopnerl BRCS Sol Group Type.'0 131-0$4,....' B.C.a D Rena Re Meson Period for Detention Carta I.`,i'I,'. woprdoro Dele Soi Group r '�7•%:"t;'.'seers(z,s.10,25.5a.or 100) Ration Parcel for DMenliOn Control �7•�,^.1M;�yews(7,5.Di 10.25,50,or 1001 Tote of C0.:erq.ton of walersfed '.C ''6:C':7 s',mute, rang of Concerereuon of Weer-shod To- 22 mines Allowable Unit es.Rate q-EL L.'003 Ulan. AAormble Unit Release Rom y Onelou Praoe oal,on p,- 9•'<1 .2.61 6.f,)nos.o '`ii';:0.95..-%.•x1w O..s-h.0.a Precipitation Pr•M26t'�.0 axles Deign Ralydell IDf Formula I•C,-P,rIC,.t,)'C, Oesla.Pelee'lDF Formula I•C.•P./IC,elcrC, Coen amt On. C,• .._e20.50:13 Coefficient One C,• 76.50 Co.Tcent Two el•t"."".---44410'-rt. Coercion'Two C•7. 10 Coerce.Thee CI-d 0,76925:: Cwr0dM. Thee C,• 0.789- Determination of Average Outflow Nom the Basin IGakulaledl: Determination of Average Outflow from the Basin(Calculaledl, Runoff Coercive C w 0.29 Runoff Coef5rient C w 0.52 Inflow Peek Runoff Op-ii• 16.02 rte 1,ibr Peek Runoff Dpi.• 70.43 do A9dvebia Peek Outflow Pate Opod a 0.01 do Someeoy Peek Outlaw Role Opod w 9.06 05. Mod.FAA Mier Storage Vol...,• 32,432 able feel Mod.FM Mete Storage V oA.ne• 123,401 cable re+l ��`��,y. Mod FAA Minor Storage a 0.745 .w.4 Mod FAA Myer Storage Velal.e)• 2914 eoen ,. S.,-45F e-Enter Rainfall Duration Increment*Ircreere Valle Mere(eq_5 rq_5-MiUes) R.itel Rallis. Infi0. 7 Mluemet Avow* Outflow &nape Rainfall Rectal Inflow 09500ner0 Aver ogo Outflow Storer D.+.tion hMreity Volum. Fens Ola0ow • Volume Valet Duauen Inlen.ry Volume F0000 Outflow Volume Vdgdre nine.. rehire 7 M wok Iee1 de waic feel cute gala niter Inches/lc cubic Ieet As cubic feet cubic feel ':. 6.iv7, 1x4614) Rube) (.01004) _ (90404) (outrul_ Wave)1 _UMW) (0045611 (0010041 (alWI) (WWI) (output) (aMa) X11 17 090 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 000 0 000 1 Dore 0 0 S 3.20 6,664 0.61 0.56 167 0,517 5 6.76 42,761 e61 i 5.50 1,667 41,119 13 2.55 13,541 0.73 0.06 306 13444 10 7.00 60,107 0.73 6.50 3,952 64,236 IS 2.14 17.410 054 0.76 605 16.725 15 5.57 65.799 0.04 7.62 6.654 74914 20 1.66 24103 0.45 0.86 1.037 19060 20 5.06 99,036 O06 466 10,374 04662 25 , 1.64 72,252 - 1.00 091 1,360 24893 26 450 109616 1.00 A04 13,565 94033 30 1.47 24,032 1.00 0.01 1,620 22402 30 4.05 116,306 1.00 0.06 16.302 102,060 35 ^ 1.34 25,649 1.00 0.91 1,902 23.647 35 269 125,662 1.00 toe 19,019 104643 40 1.24 24670 1.00 0.91 2,174 24.690 40 140 132,366 1.00 9.06 21,736 110.632 45 , 1.16 240.'0 1.00 0.61 2.446 24593 45 115 139,127 7 1.00 900 24,468 113,674 60 1.07 29067 1,00 0.91 2.717 24370 50 291 143,292 1.00 506 27,170 154,121 66 T 1.01 30,037 1.00 0.91 2,989 27.049 55 270 147.974 I 1.00 0.06 20.607 114087 00 0.05 30,907 1.00 0.01 3.260 27,641 60 260 152,266 t _ 1,00 906 32.894 119,664 66 090 31,700 1.00 0.01 3522- 24177 66 147 156.206 1.00 9.06 35,321 120.066 ;• 70 , 065 32453 1.00 0.91 3, 340 004 24649 70 2.34 159.6)2 t 1.00 906 36 121.634 75 061 39,147 1.00 0.95 4,076 29,071 75 223 163_251 -t 1.00 9.06 40,756 122536 /D 0.78 33797 1,00 091 4.347 29,450 60 214 166,0:7'.._ 1.00 0.00_ 43,472 123024 66 0.74 34.410 1.00 0.01 4,610 29.791 85 245 169.515 ' 1.00 0.06 44189 123,325 0) 0.72 34,909 1.00 0.91 4.691 30.096 60 1.97 172,367 1.00 0.04 _ 46,906 123,461 05 0.54 36,5311 1,00 0.91 5,182 34376 96 1,00 175,072 1.00 906 61,073 123,449 100 086 34000 1.00 0.91 5.434 30,626 100 1.02 177.646. 1.00 0.66 54.340 123316 • 106 0.64 36,659 1.00 0.91 4706 30,063 105 1.78 190,099 1.00 906 57.067 123042 • 110 042 37,036 1.00 0.91 4977 31.067 110 1.70 112.444 1.00 906 69774 1222.670 • 110 0.90 37.491 1,00 091 4249 31,242 115 1.66 154,692 1.00 0.06 ' 82,491 122,201 120 066 37.029 1,00 0.01 8,621 31,408 120 1.60 066.649 1.00 9.06 64205 121,041 125 0.58 34350 1.00 0.01 6,793 31.558 125 1.55 164925 1.00 906 67.026 124909 130 0.56 347.044 766 1.00 0.61 31,692 130 1.61 100,924 ' 1.00 906 70,642 120,202 136 0.63 34148 1,00 091 7.334 31,612 136 1.47 102.653 1.00 906 73,359 119,494 140 0.62 39626 1.00 091 7.006 31,916 140 1.43 194,717 1.00 9.06 76,076 114641 145 0.51 39,002 1.00 _ 091 7,079 32.013 145 1.39 190,521 1.00 9.06 74793 117,727 160 046 44247 1.00 0.91 4191 32.006 150 1.36 196.268 1.00 906 61,510 116.766 166 446 40,601 1.00 0.01 0.423 32.166 155 1.32 190,903 1.00 9.06 64,227 115,733 100 0.47 40,925 1.00 0.01 4691 32230 • 160 1.29 201,606 1.00 v 9.08 89944 114,464 136 0.49 41,249 I 1.00 0.01 0.066 32,263 16 1.26 203.207 1.00 906 69661 113646 170 0.46 41,545 I 1.00 095 9.238 32,327 170 1.24 204,763 1.00 0.06 92,376 11;364 176 0.44 41,873 I 100 0.91 0,510 32,363 175 1.21 206277 1.00 0.06 96,016 111.182 180 0.43 40,172 1.00 0.01 4761 31361 180 1.18 207,753 1.00 0.06 67.612 101,941 106 0.42 42,454 t.00 091 10.063 32,411 185 1.54 299,193 1.00 905 100,620 10696 100 0.41 42,749 7.00 0.91 10,325 32.471 190 1.14 210,597 1.09 906 103246 107,361 106 0.45 43,028 1.00 091 10,696 32,432 196 1.12 211.969 1.00 9.06 10496 108,006 200 0,40 43,300 7,00 091 10,869 32,432 200 1,09 213,310 1.00 9-06 104860 104,129 206 0.36 43,586 1.00 0.91 11,140 71,426 206 1.07 214,821 1,00 908 111,397 103223 210 0.36 43827 700 0.91 11,411 32.415 210 1.06 215,904 1.00 0.06 114.114 101,790 216 038 4081 1.00 091 11,63 32396 215 1.04 217,159 1.00 0.06 11461 100,325 230 0.37 44331 1.00 0.91 11.966 32,376 220 1.02 214369 1,00 0.06 119546 16.041 225 036 44,576 1.00 091 12,227 32.340 225 1.00 219696 1.00 406 122265 97,320 230 036 44,516 1.00 0.91 12,496 32318 230 0.99 220,777 1.00 906 124,962 96,794 235 0.36 44051 ' 1.00 0.91 12,770 32.291 236 0.97 221.936 f 1.00 I 0.06 ' 127,899 04,237 240 0.36 45,282 1.00 0.91 13,042 32,240 240 0.06 223074 1.00 006 130,416 92.657 24$ 034 45,509 1,00 091 13,313 32.116 245 094 224.191 1.00 1I' 0.06 133,133 91.057 260 0.34 45.732 1.00 0.91 13606 32,148 260 0.92 225,268 1.00 I 0.00 135,161 60.437 256 0.33 44560 1.00 091 13,957 32094 266 001 226,366 1.00 f1) K06 134660 07.794 2'00 0.33 46.589 1.00 991 14,126 32.037 260 0.00 227,426 1.00 406 141.286 06,141 265 0.32 49377 I 190 0.01 14,400 31,977 205 OAS 228,447 1.00 0.06 144,002 64,466 270 0.32 46,546 1,00 091 14,672 31,913 270 097 229,492 1.00 906 144719 82,774 275 931 46.790 1.00 451 14,944 31,846 275 O66 230,601 1.00 906 149,436 61,065 L 290 0.31 46,991 1.00 0.91 15215 31,78 , 280 0.06 231.400 1.00 9.06 152,153 79.340 245 030 47,169 1.00 0.91 05.407 31,747 285 054 232,470 1.00 906 154,670 77.401 290 0.30 47.386 100 061 15.769 31,626 _ 290 0.6 233432 1.00 9.06 157,667 75,646 795 030 47,577 1.00 6.91 16,030 31.547 206 002 2'34,361 1.00 A06 160,301 74,077 1 III 300 0.29 47,767 1.00 0.91 16.302 31.465 _ 300 0.81 2311,316 1.00 9.06 163.021 72.294 Med.FM Minor Storage Volume Irene 11.1• 32,432 Meg FAA 1114.30..v.l•w.(ouble 101• 123,441 Mod.FAA Minor Storage Vol...1•c•lt)c 0.7445 Mel FM Map.swag.vow..Mon-No 2_6341 UDFCCI DETENTION VOLUME ESTIMATING WORKBOOK Version 2.03,Released February 2006 1 -O.MMon Baait Al.d.,"Sodded FAA 152006.170 PM bE1ENTJON V0Ll1MEB:rn4 M0DIFIE6 FAA M , ...;::,,--A t%,. ....'.. • . c Pc S?f U M Yotunie 2 Storage-Chapter for desc*1i%lon of is y ,t:; a4ilisitr s ..., . . yr , 0 Project: Mead Town Center — Basin ID:Developed Basin Al Inflow and Outflow Volumes vs.Rainfall Duration 250,000 200,000 —__ • •• 150,000 ' — • . , a :_ .. • _.. u- V A : • �o ♦•... . ••�•••••_• i... ••g .• ' .•••. . 1 . .. .. ..i•> 100,000 • • ___ ••, l • • • . •4• • �0•,• •:•�•.• ••• , • ....i .._.; ._ .... ..._ it • • 50 1 oDOott a a _ . _..... s�o ._._...._._................ 000.o oq.goo00.t3000o0o0ooQo0ogo00o0ooQ.q.00. 0 I 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 Duration(Minutes) -0-Minor$torn Inflow Volum• -a—Minor Storm Outflow Votuan O Minor Stone Storage MANY -•-Major Slam Inflow Volume --&—Major Storm Outflow Volume • Major Storm Storage VoNwm \ / • UDFCD DETENTION VOL VME ESTIMATING WORKBOOK Version 2.03,Released February 2008 llt)DNMion_Bav Al.do,Marled FAA 1512O34.1 20 pM •> ` rDETEHTIQNVOLUIYi1=BY`, HirMOQIF�AAMEtllOp -' s '',1 s x.iYs.:-•rr�'C4.2 ^ts.. E ... (See U$�.M 1(0 (0,2 S*oaJP,y tee, �Xo- .,...t.$ ^A' �sl�'...:i.x. '` • 0 Project: Mead Town Center Basin 10:Developed Basin A2 (For catchments less than 160 apes only. For larger catchments,use hydrograph routing method) (NOTE:for catchments larger than 90 acres,CUHP hydrograph and routing are recommended) Ir1e8. BeterminatIow of MINOR Detention Voluma(king Modified TAA Method +• ?, ..' •�-+y , �v'r t .,37, ._oettxldlnaNQt!of MAJOR oftotl YolJrttgh(ng 6loaned.FAA McThgd' Design Informatlgn(Inp11U: Peskin infolination linputti Caldme t Gramme Inpviuxn.ay 1.• ;:87.00'.,.. meant Catchment Det aining Imperviousness I•a 82 CO percent Catchment Deanne Area A•• .'21.570 acres Catchment Drainage Area A- 21 570 saes Predevelepne6 NRCS Sol Croup Type. '.8 A 9.C.w0 Preoerelo0rw4 NRCS Sol Group Tan Period let Detention Contra T... •10 ' toe'r 9 rl 0.(or D Reg ..::ywaa 12,5.10.25,50,a 100) Raven Pw iod fw Detente.Control T-l�'��;'f,�06�?_D.'.�.lyoen(2.5.10,25.50.a IMO Tyne el Comer4etnn of kNaterkhon Tc." `;''24 .} mecums Thle'I Concentration of watershed TO. 24 mindea ABawbb kh.t Rdatee fate '1 ..r.`0.03':' ahlerre A2ow.N.Unit Release Rate a-R&M=der we One-hair Recipiatan P,. .:`•1:61 : 41,41•. CrroJO.r Proca Goon P..k'f, + inches Design Rainfall'DI Form). I=C,'P,l(C,OIJ^C, D..Ign 9.04.01OF Form.le 1•C,'P,!(C,e1J°C, Coeffc.nt On. C,- ''2060' Cae8cle4 One CI. 26,50 Coefficient Two Cr. '10 CoeffratTwo Ca. 10 Coefficient Try.. C,_,.. 0.789`..., Coelived Three Ce• 0.786 •— ermin f vet utflow mth B lc ula . PS(ermInatlon of Average Outflow trod)the Bak)ICalcutale4L Runoff Codfa ant C• 0.66 Runoff Coefficient C. 0.72 _ Inflow Peek Rural? Opih• ,99.62 de Ireow Peak R.adl opal. 71.50 de Allowable Peek O.nbow Rate (*out• 073 de Mowed.Peek Outflow Rate 0I*o.a• 6.47 de Mod.FM Minor Steep.Volum.. 121,437 cubic feel Mott.FM Myer Storage Volvo.a 135600 a.bk tad Mad FAA Minor Storage. 2.7.6 *craft Mod FM Mal..Storage Volume)• 3633 smell c,--..>+15 <-Enter Rodeo Meehan lrcrsmer1N tiara.,Vere/M.(e.g.512 5-.tMe1) Redd Rainfall IrA.w 441.41r.ent Awage Outflow Sloral7• Rana Ranh& led... MWymMB Average O.tfrow Slope Ova00. Mansity Velure Factor Oul m Volume Volum. [A.at58 1r4.eir Volum Fad.. °M ow •Velum. Volume mw.M4 041..Ire abr lest do cubic Met cubic fay r.'eo,Us Inc0.4 M cubic 1..1 do cubic feet cubic feel (mat I9u40l (o.dpa) (156.61 (01016) 114.0 8.524) (•9.4) (IMMO (Meat) (0004 (auAl) (OUi 111) _ laawg _ 3 f•-,,, K.,,, i1 003 0 i 000 COO 0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 100 0 0 15 362 46.577 1 0.61 0.80 538 46.141 15 5.87 02.023 0.61 626 4,732 77291 30 250 63,049 1.00 0.73 1.320 61,729 30 4.05 113.218 1.00 6.47 11.046 101.570 45 1.94 73.562 100 073 1,000 71.562 45 311 132,096 100 0.47 17,472 114,623 60 1.81 01,086 I 1.00 0.73 2,110 761447 - 60 2.60 141009 1.00 647 23296 122313 76 1.36 16963 l 1,00 073 3,300 83563 75 223 156,160 1.00 5.47 20.120 127,046 90 1.21 91.797 _ 1.00 0.n 3.060 87.637 90 1.97 164,640 1.00 5.47 34,946 120898 1 105 1.09 9(914 1.00 0.73 4,620 91,291 106 1.76 172231 1.00 647 40,767 131,486 120 0.59 06510 1.00 0.73 5,280 94,229 120 1.60 178,600 100 6.47 48,591 132066 136 0.00 102707 1.00 0.73 5,040 96,767 136 1.47 104,431 1.00 6.47 62,415 1312,018 i 150 0.61 106,601 1.00 0.73 0,600 90900 150 1.36 100809 1.00 6.47 60239 131,370 165 0.76 108.221 I 1.00 0.73 7.260 100,961 165 1.26 194333 1.00 647 64,003 130270 180 0.73 110.842 I 1.00�..._ 0.73 7.021 102722 180 1.18 104060 1.00 5.47 69,867 128794 1% 069 112,666 100 073 1681 104.307 106 1.12 202,712 1.00. 647 76,711 177,002 0 210 166 114,961 1.00 0.73 9.241 106.742 210 1.06 _ 206,476 1.00 1.47 61526 124940 225 0.62 11490 1.00 0.73 9,901 107,046 225 100 210,005 100 8.47 87.369 122648 240 059 118602 1.00 0.73 10,561 106.241 240 0.86 253,332 1.00 5.47 0.9,162 120160 255 0.68 120656 1.00 073 11221 100,334 255 D.91 214480 1.00 647 09.006 117.474 270 0.64 17{220 1.00 0.73 11,681 110,339 270 067 219,470 1.00 647 104.830 114840 265 062 123,605 1.00 0.73 12541 111.265 286 0.84 222.315 1.00 6.47 110,864 111,864 300 000 125,321 1.00 0.73 13301 112,120 300 0.91 225.036 1.00 6.47 118471 1014660 316 040 124771 1.00 073 13,881 012910 316 0.78 227,643 1.00 047 122,302 106.341 330 ,, 0.41 124163 1 1.00 0.73 14,621 113,642 330 076 234142 1.00 647 ' 128126 102,016 346 0.46 128501 1.00 0.73 16,191 114320 346 072 232,646 1.00 6.47 _ 133.960 98698 360 0.43 130.791 I 1.00 0.73 15,641 114,960 360 0.70 234.061 1.00 6.47 13(774 08067 375 0.42 132.035 ) 1.00 073 19.501 115,534 376 065 237.095 1.00 6.47 145,698 91,407 390 041 133.237 i 100 0.73 17,161 114078 390 008 238264 100 647 161.421 87,832 405 039 134.400 ! 100 0.73 17,621 116,679 406 a64 241.343 1.00 647 167245 14,007 420 0.36 138626 1.00 0.73 14401 117,047 420 0.62 243,387 ' 1.00 6,47 103,069 80290 435 0.37 136.621 1.00 0.73 19141 117,460 436 001 245,331 1.00 8.47 168603 76,438 460 036 137,604 1.00 073 19,801 117,602 450 0.50 247,238 1.00 447 174,707 72521 466 0.36 134716 1.00 ti 0.73 20481 114256 465 0.57 240093 1.00 647 180,541 68.652 490 0.36 130.721 1.00 0.73 21.121 114600 460 0.56 250.097 1.00 647 106.365 64,632 496 0.34 144700 103 0.73 21,781 11(019 495 0.55 252866 1.00 647 100,109 60406 610 0.33 141,064 1.00 0.73 22,441 114213 510 054 254360 1.00 647 108,013 56366 626 0.32 142666 1.00 0.73 23.101 119.463 625 0.62 268040 1.00 8,47 201037 52203 540 032 143,494 1.00 073 .23.762 119.732 640 0.51 267.672 1.00 6.47 200000 44011 665 0.31 144.362 1.00 0.73 24,422 114160 565 0.50 260.266 1.00 647 215.484 431762 670 0.30 145,250 1.00 0.73 26,062 120168 570 0.40 280825 1.00 6.47 221,300 30,517 585 0.30 146.099 1.00 0.73 73742 120,367 586 0.48 762360 1.00 6.47 221.132 35,218 600 0.29 146.930 1.00 0.73 26,402 120,629 600 0.47 263643 1.00 647 232.950 38607 616 0.29 147,744 1,00 0.73 27,062 120.083 615 0.46 2861305 1.00 6.47 234780 28626 630 026 140542 1.00 0.73 27,722 120,820 630 0.45 266737 1.00 647 244.804 22134 645 0.28 149,324 1.00 073 26,382 120,943 645 0.45 266142 1.00 647 250.428 17,714 660 0.27 150007 1,00 0.73 29,042 121.060 060 0.44 269619 1.00 6.47 256232 13260 675 027 150.044 1.00 0.73 . 29,702 121,143 675 043 270.871 1.00 6.47 212078 8.796 690 0.26 161,504 1.00 073 30,362 121.222 , 890 0.42 272109 1.00 8,47 267.600 4209 706 026 152310 1.00 0.73 31,022 121289 705 042 273501 1.00 6.47 273.723 -221 720 0.25 163.023 1.00 073 31.662 121,341 720 0.41 274783 1.00 6.47 278547 4,764 735 0.26 1531721 1.00 0.73 32342 021.362 735 0.40 276.042 1.00 647 283.371 -8329 750 0.24 154,413 100 073 33.002 121.411 750 040 277,290 1,00 647 291,196 •13.015 764 0.24 110.091 1.00 0.73 33,662 121,429 704 039 278,496 1.00 647 297,019 -1(521 780 024 165.730 j 1.00 073 34,372 121.437 780 0.38 _ 274696 1.00 647 302843 ,23,147 7% 0.23 160,415 ( 1.00 073 34,962 121,431 795 0.36 280,675 1.00 6.47 308,867 •27,791 810 023 157,082 1.00 073 36,642 121,420 810 037 262,036 1.00 6.47 314,491 .12,464 026 023 167.099 1.00 073 36,302 121,317 025 0.37 263160 1,00 6.47 320316 -57.134 640 022 156,326 1.00 073 38,962 121.264 640 036 204,307 1.00 647 326,138 41,832 656 022 158945 1.00 0.73 371671 121,322 666 036 286,417 1.00 647 331,962 45.645 _ 670 022 169664 1.00 073 30262 1211272 170 0.36 206511 1.00 6.47 337,766 '61279 • 866 0.72 160.136 1.00 0.73 36.942 121.212 866 0.35 217.390 1.00 - 647 349.610 36,026 9 169 00 021 746 1.60 073 3x503 121,145 500 0.34 206,664 100 6.47 349,434 1 -60,760 Mod FAA Miner Stowage Volume(cubic 0). 121,417 Mod FAA Major Stara Vokne'cubic Med.FAA Mine Storage Volta .(.cr.-1LI c 2,71178 Mod FAA Ma Sterge I Igo 2.05 2• for erg.Yahyn.(acn4l}� 7.012. UDFCD DETENTION VOLUME ESTIMATING WORKBOOK Version 2.03,Released February 2008 (AD.MnOul_B.eb.A2.d•.Msd4.d FM 3/5/2006,122 PI4 DETENTION.VOLUME BY.THE MODIFIED FAA METHb17,' - ' - ,1See USDCM Volume 2 Storage Clitipler for tie;crlp1iori of titethoej '.,;` _ ... . Project: Mead Town Center Basin IO:Developed Basin A2 Inflow and Outflow Volumes vs.Rainfall Duration 400,000 . 350.000 ----- - • __.... _ -- • • 300,000 - - 250,000 — u A 200,000 — -- ' U - i . ' m • E _ 150.000 — _ 4 ! ' - 1 •a ill Cp00 '0000070000000060000000000 DO 00000 0 0,4000 =' •" . 100,000 • r • 50,000ti • 0 - . . • i • 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 Duration(Minutes) _ -9-Mlner Sierra 11AlowVelune -6-Mlnor Storm Outflow Volum. 0 Mina Storm Storage Volume -e-Major Storm Inflow Volume -A-Major Slam Outflow Volume • Major Slam Stag.Volume 1 4111 UDFCD DETENTION VOLUME ESTIMATING WORKBOOK Version 2.03.Released February 2008 UO-O.l n Bran A2'iv..Modee0 FM 315.20011,1:27 PM DETENTION Vbl;UAAE BY2T}tE MQDIFIED FAA METHOD ' , r :'I (See USDCM VOIII 2 S .. . y: tolagee<tar tlescriptim:of methoft) ' • Project: Mead Town Center Basin ID:Developed Basin A3 (For catchments less than 150 acres only. For larger catchments,use hydrograph routing method) (NOTE:for catchments larger than 90 acres,CUHP hydrograph and routing are recommended) 3.7 ,t' ,1FA1 (a R Detenpon Vohtme Using 56ad;8ed FAA Mettlod -*v,•" g f pn ofMA,1pR - DesiOn IMormallon7lnaulF. "'•� _----- ' m mention VWume"{jsing Madill FAA tA¢5fwd- De Catchment founa(iooiheinous south I Design Intorinatton(Input): ":5200;. percent Catchment Dr.roge Imperviousness 1.. 2.0 80 pervert _CNUmet Drain..Mee A 4,780 " acres Catchment Or.inage Area A- 24.100 scree P.Oevelopme t MRCS Soil Group Type= Fr A\B.C.or 0 Predeveloprnert NRCS Sol Group Type r B A B.C.or 0 Realm Plod for Detention Control T ". 10 150 7448$(2.5,10.25,50,Or 100) Return Period for Detention Owned T :=k-jpa'46P.l years(2,5.10,25.50.or 100 Tine of Core.rtretivtd Watershed Tc 1 z4 •w�ltmtl Tn..of CO.on,*M,on of Watershed To24 unkuW Allowable Unit Release Rale G 003 i'clyaae Allowable Unit Release Rate Cr'Gr.�Q;9& 'ctyeoe One-hour-hourPrecipitation, OM.q.4 P.e gilam., P 'rP,j85 :'=nth. noshgn Raln4.91DF Formula 1=C,•P,J(C,.TJ•C _ Design Rainfall IDF Formula I=C,•P,/(C,.TJ"C, Coefficient One C,_.i.)2350.-:. Coefficient One Cr- 2650 -.--- Coefficient Too Ct- •';113'", ' Coefficient Thee Coefficient Two Cr= M Ca'•,.r0.7e0.:. Coefficient Three Co° 0.789 p_elermf anon of Average Outflow from the Basin(Calculated)' F Determination of Average Outflow from the Basin ICslculated): Runoff Coefficient Co 0.65 Runoff Coen tent C• 0.72 Inflow Peak Runoff Corn a 45.75 cfs Inflow Peek R,roll Op-in• 62.15 do Allowable Peel.Outflow Rife Op-.nA= 0.84 d. Allowable Peek Outflow Rat. OP'14 a. 742 cisMinorMod.FAA Nor Storms.Volume. 139,508 _ Cubk het Mod.FAA Major Storage Volume e 181,757..E(ptee4 1�r Mod.FAA Minor Swage a 3203 ,weal Nod.FAA Major Stowe Velum). 3,494 .0004 g<•+�r 0-Ewa Barrel Oration Inuerwr4y Increase Value Hart(.s.5 for 5•Minutes) Pastel Rafe brow Adjustment Average Outjbw Storage Rainfall Rainfall Inh w 8d}memrt Ammrmo. Mawr Storage Amalie. Interiorly Volume Cooke Outflow Volume Volume Duelnn Intensify Volume Fodor Outlaw Volume Volume minutes inches/Is cubic Net at cubic Net cubic feet mutes inches l h cubic teal ets cubic foal cubic foal (output) (0.16,0) (oodP4) 11544.1) _ (oelw6) (output) toward) lert011 (oulpa) IMAM lwMul (output) (outM) Pitr 0.00 • 0 0.03 0.00 0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 000 0 0 15 3.02 52,475 081 0.68 616 51,059 • 15 687 94,230 0,81 6.04 5,436 88.793 30 250 73,432 i 1,00 0.84 _ 1,517 709,6 30 4.05 130,067 1.00 7.43 13,381 115.686 a5 1.94 84.509 1.00 0.04 2,275 62254 46 3.15 151.753 1.00 _ 7.43 20,072 131,681 60 1.64 93.755 1.00 0.64 3,033 90,122 60 200 157,278 1.00 7.43 _ 26,762 140,515 75 1.38 90,106 1.00 0.54 0791 96.113 75 2.23 179.399 1.00 7.43 33,453 145,946 90 1.21 106.458 1.00 0.84 4,540 100,005 00 1.07 189,371 1.00 7.43 40,144 140,227 105 1.09 110.186 1.00 084 5.305 104,880 105 1.70 197,865 1.00 7.43 40.834 151.031 120 0.00 114.310 100 0.34 5,065 100,252 120 1.60 205,282 1.00 7.43 53,525 151.757 136 0.90 117,902 1.00 0.54 0.424 111,157 135 1.47 211.677 1,00 7.43 60,215 161.682 150 0.54 121.306 1.00 054 7.503 113.722 160 1.36 217.627 1,00 7.43 65906 150.521 165 0.78 124,320 1.00 0e4 8.341 115986 163 119 223,253 1.00 7.43 73,597 140.666 _100 - 0.73 127.109 1.00 0.84 0.099 110.009 100 1.18 _ 226249 COO 7.43 00.287 147,960 195 0.50 120.687 I 1.00 0.84.� 6557 110.630 . 195 1.12 232,879 1.00 7,43 earn 145,002 41) 210 O.Os 132004 I 1.00 0.84 10,616 121.479 210 1.00 237,202 1.00 7.43 93668 143.634 225 0.62 134,363 1.00 0.54 11.374 122,979 225 1.00 241.257 1.00 7.43 100.359 140,880 240 0.59 138,481 190 0.84 12.132 121.349 240 0.96 245,080 1.00 7.43 107.060 138.000 256 0.58 136496 1.00 0.84 12.801 123,006 255 0.91 248,896 1.00 7"43 113,740 134.056 _ 270 0.54 140,408 7.00 0.64 13.849 126.769 270 0.87 253.131 1.00 793 120,431 131.700 206 0.52 142.230 1.00 0.54 14,407 127,623 286 054 255,403 1.00 7.43 127.121 126201 330 050 143,971 1.00 0.84 15,/85 126005 300 0.81 258,528 1.00 7,43 133,512 124.71$ 316 0.48 145,837 1.00 0.94 •15,924 124713 • 315 0.76 201.620 1.00 743 14.503 121.017 330 0.48 147.23$ 1.00 004 115,652 130.554 330 075 264,392 1.00 l 7.43 147,193 117,199 345 045 146773 900 0.44 17,440 131.333 . 345 0.72 257.153 1.00 7.43 163.554 113.269 300 0.43 150.255 _ 100 0.94 _ 18,105 132,063 • 360 0.70 209.012 1.00 7.43 180574 104236 375 Q42 151084 1.00 Des 15.067 132,727 • 375 0.88 272.379 1.00 7.43 167,254 106,114 390 0.41 163,066 1.00 0.54 18775 133.350 390 0.66 274.850 1.00 - 7.43 173,958 100,003 405 0.39 154,402 100 0.84 20473 133.025 405 0.64 277.259 1.00 7.43 150545 06613 420 0.30 166,897 1.00 0.84 21.232 134.466 • 420 062 279,665 1.00 7.43 187.337 92.248 435 037 156.063 100 0.84 21,990 134.903 435 0.61 281,841 1.00 7.43 104,027 97,813 450 0.36 161173 1.00 0.54 22,748 135,425 450 0.69 254,032 1.00 7.43 200.718 03,314 465 0.35 159380 1.00 084 23.506 135,853 465 0.57 208,152 1.00 7.43 207,409 74763 4810 0.36 160,514 1.00 0.44 24265 136,250 480 036 269.235 1.00 7.43 f 214,099 74,136 405 - 0.34 161,639 1.00 084 25.023 135,616 495 055 290,254 100 7.43 220700 69,466 510 a38 102.735 1.00 0.44 23,781 136,954 510 064 202223 100 7.43 t 227,480 64.742 525 0.32 163804 4.00 084 26,539 137.265 525 0.52 296143 1.00 7.43 234.171 69972 640 0.32 154.840 1.00 0.54 27,298 137.551 840 031 296.018 1.00 7.43 240862 55,150 655 0.31 154,869 1.00 0.84 20566 137,812 566 060 297.850 1,00 7.43 247,542 50,298 570 030 186,666 1.00 _ 044 26514 136051 570 0.49 209.541 • 1.00 7.43 264343 45,390 565 0.90 167.541 100 0.84 25,572 135.269 585 0.45 301.392 1.00 { 7.43 200.033 40,459 600 025 100796 1.00 O44 30.331 138,455 600 047 303,107 1.00 7.43 267.624 35,403 615 029 159.731 1.00 0.54 31,009 138.643 515 0.46 306,797 1.00 7.43 274,315 30,472 630 0.29 170.640 1.00 0.54 31,447 134001 630 0.46 300.433 1.00 7.43 251,006 25.427 545 920 171.647 1.00 0.84 32006 136,441 646 0.4$ 300.046 1.00 7.43 207.546 20,360 660 027 172425 1.00 0.44 33.364 139,064 660 044 309.629 1.00 7.43 294.306 16,242 075 027 173293 1.00 0.54 34.122 139.171 675 _ 0.43 341,162 1.00 793 301,077 10.106 690 020 174,142 1.00 ores 34.540 134282 690 0.42 312.707 1.00 7.43 307.706 4.930 705 010 174,976 1.09 044 35.539 139.337 705 0.42 314,204' 1.00 7.43 314468 -254 720 025 175,795 1.00 g54 _36.397 139.306 720 0.41 315.670 _ 1.00 7.43 321.149 6473 _ 735 0.26 178,801 1.00 004 37.155 139.445 735 0.40 317,122 1.00 I 7.43 327.610 -16717 750 024 177,303 33 100 014 37,913 139,479 750 040 310.544 5.00 7.43 334.530 •16.655 765 024 179.122 S 1.00 0.04 38,672 139.500 765 039 319,943 1.00 I 7.43 341,221 "21.277 740 0.24 174030 I 1.00 0.54 39.430 139,606 700 0.38 321.320 1.00 7.43 347,911 26,592_ 795 028 179 1.00 0.84 46105 134505 706 035 322,674 1.00 7.43 354.502 41,927 610 023 100,436 1 1.00 054 40.046 130,489 810 0.37 324,008 1,00 7.43 361,202 -37154 325 023 191.167 1.00 0.44 41.705 130,463 825 0.37 325.322 1.00 7.43 387.503 ♦2.681 840 0.22 151,605 ? 1.00 0.54 42453 119425 840 035 325.617 1.00 7.43 374.674 X8,067 655 022 192,508 I 1.00 0.54 43,221 139377 055 034 327,892 1.00 7.43 _ 381.364 43,472 578 0.22 103199 1.00 0.84 43,950 130.319 670 0.35 324149 1.00 7.43 365066 -64905 685 0.22 103.989 l 1.00 004 44.738 139,251 486 0.36 330,380 1.00 ( 743 394,745 44,367 _ j• 9O0 0.21 154,670 1.00 084 46,495 139,174 900 0.34 331,611 1.00 i 7.43 401,430 49825 Mod.FAA Mktg Storage Vol...,..(cubic ft). 139,358 Mod FAA Major 544049.Vol....(cubic ft). 151,757 Mod.FAA Mow slung.Vol.....(.v.-1t)• 32027 Nod FAA Major Sla000e Vol.,...(.cs.-11.)0 3.4439 UDFCD DETENTION VOL LIME ESTIMATING WORKBOOK Version 2.03,Released February 2008 03.0.rim_B.ekl 63.66 Npd4.d FM 153/2000,123 PM *i°1k:l . �'„k TEN bE 1ON VO(l1M.E BY THEM '�,• J )J1VHOb:•. :.,. -iile, ,7,-.--...-;; {See LiSOCM Volume 2 5torage Chaptetr ., oo+nettiodj•; • • Project: Mead Town Center Basin ID:Developed Basin A3 -- - - - - — Inflow and Outflow Volumes vs.Rainfall Duration 450,000 _ I I . • • • 400,000 - - - 350,000 - • 300:000 I .. • i li 250,000 a E 200,000 a 150,000 '• .- =�: - = ......00OG11.ZJO'oolaooati o • • oc000�©oob=000000e•• ..._._r ..._ :... 100,000 — -- ;*, j • . d.. • 50,000 - - j 1• : I 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 Duration(Minutes) `t-Minor Sterne brow Volu.. -6-Minor Sloan Outflow Volume O Minor Storm Storage VAMP - Major Slam Inflow Volu,. -+M Major Storm Outflow Vora..» • Major Mom Storage Velem . UDFCD DETENTION VOLUME ESTIMATING WORKBOOK Version 2.03,Released February 2008 tA-oebrtut 84tH A3.,da,Mod(nd FM 315/2006.1 13 CN s 41..51 DETENTION VOLD ,BY jFt NAOW ED EAA METHOD. . ' r `" �., {See USP47a V Wtatle 5toelicieC er for descffpdgrt of rte hodj_, • Project:Mead Town Center i Basin ID:Developed Basin A4 (For catchments less than 160 acres only. For larger catchments,use hydrograph routing method) aa (NOTE:for catchments larger than 90 acres,CUIiP hydrograph and routing are recommended) hfjltYdlrme_Ushlg A194jitFt= �'. .Drrptn '!F, '.,.O-a:r.. t 'k fa. *..y tlkrr:4..../7li(Re Usi. Modified FAA Method ()mice Information Ilnout�; m." ... �---- -- _ —_ Design InformaU07111n0u1)< Catchment Draiege Imperviousness I,• 8700 Derced Catchment Drainage Io m'000aMat I.• Crti.n4r4 Drainage NM A= ,S�sO: w 82.00 .pe . m C�Irhmst Drainage Area A� 15065 wee ProdewtMoment NRCS Sod Group Type- G ',;J A.B.C.or 0 0.sdmvelowasra 46405 Sat Group T cr R Period for D.lenlion Control - 10 year,(2,5.10.25.50.a 100) Return Period fa Detention Control 39T D a,�;; ( -.0ara 2.ram 5.Nan 110.26.50,a 100) rm.dcatceba6on of Watered 1.- 24 nw.,te T of Conudrotlon of Watershed Tc• 4 minuet A6ueade Orel Release Rate a` 0.03�' delete Allowable UM Release Rate q a,',w",:r;y.'�_ru' chime Oro-hour Pracipis5ort On hour Proq,tabon Ps a o�3 t!, Mfg lea Design Rainfall IDF Formula Is C,'P,I(C,.TeC, Omafy Rainfall IOF Formula i•C,'PaC,.TJ"C. Coefficient One C,• ..28.50.; Coefficient One reeflctena Too C,_ .10 Cn` 20 Coefficient Thee Coefficient Tao C.• 10 10 4= ��0.780_... CoeK iea Pam Caw 3 T59 pelerminatlon of Ayeraael)ufflow from the Basin(Calculated); Pe termination of Average Outflow from the Basin{Calculated'- Pima C.oafriciect C= 005 Runoff 00.480ie C• 072 Irllsw Peak Runoff Qyit• 27.50 d. Idlav Peek Runoff Obet. 4902 der Alnr.da Peak Outflow Rata ul• 462 d. Mod FAA Minor Stange Valente or 04.705 cob'.Diet AapAaW Peak Outflow Rote pp-s Mod.FAA Storage Major Say Vollmer.. 7 ruble F..1 Mod.FAA Minor E 1rr.pa• 1.946 sonde Mod FAA Maier S , Volume). 2111 enn.a :si."fe`2.tt'a3rr'.7t's-Enter Raidet Duration incremental Immerse Vale Hem 1..0.5 for SMieasa) Rainy Redd Inflow r Ndjullmad Amr ay Outflow Storage Rainfall Rainfall l„1ar Adjufeted Awape Qa60w 9baga Duration Iaeroay Volume Facke Outlaw Volume V.8,... ... -.FAaation IMera7y Volume Factor 0146. Whirrs Ward midt.. inch.,Ito cubic feel or w6ic Reel cubic Feet minute* melee 1 h cubic Met der c11610 led cubic het Ro ll ,aa{1 (dutma) 00r60 (0,6 s) 0.41 latdroll (e651) (Woo) (output) baotpd1 twtatt1 iww 11 nl (w6m, d _ Ioutw0.00 0 I 0.0D 0.00 0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 t 0.00 0 0 15 362 31,691 0.81 0.42 374 91,617 15 5.57 57,268 0.61 3,67 3,304 53,964 30 2.50 44,021 1.00 0.51 022 43,090 30 4.06 79.048 1.00 (i 4.52 6,132 70,916 45 1.94 61,300 1.00 051 1,383 40.978 46 3.15 92.226 1.00 462 12,109 80,029 • 60 181 56,615 1.00 0.51 1.843 54,771 60 2,60 601,663 1.00 t 4.52 15.266 85,396 76 1.34 40.717 1.00 0.61 2304 58413 75 223 109,020 1.00 i 4.62 20.391 58.898 50 1.21 64,092 1.00 0.61 x765 61,327 90 1.97 ' 115,093 24.777 90.891 105 149 66.967 1.00 0.61 3.226 63,741 106 1.76 120,252 1.00 452 28,463 91,790 _ 12D 0.99 60.177 1.00 0.61 3.607 66.700 120 1,60 124,760 1-00 4.52 32,530 97,230 136 0.90 71,700 1.00 0.51 4,140 07,662 136 9.47 126,758 t40 4,52 36,696 02.172 150 004 73.723 1.00 061 4500 59,114 ISO 1.38 132.384 1.00 4.62 40.882 91,722 165 0.78 75,550 1.00 051 5000 70,490 166 1.26 _ 1355,662 040 4.52 44.728 90,983 -180 0.73 77,250 1,00 0.51 6630 71,720 . 180 1,10 138,717 100 4.62 48,714 50,923 105 0.69 78617 1.00 0.51 5961 7x826 195 1.12 141,532 1.00 4.52 52651'' 89,671 210 0.45 80016 1.00 0.51 5452 73.520 210 1.06 144.159 1.00 4.62 56,977 87.232 0 225 0.82 61,853 1.90 061 8.913 74,740 225 1.00 148.824 1.00 4.52 60,993 86,631 240 0.69 62,046 1.00 061 7,373 75,573 240 0.05 145947 1.00 462 65,060 63,897 256 0.56 64,170 1.00 061 7,034 76,330 265 0.91 151.115 100 452 69.125 52.019 270 0.64 55.333 1.05 0.91 8.205 77,836 270 0.97 163.232 1,00 452 73,192 80,041 206 0,52 86,440 1.00 061 5756 77,684 286 0.54 155221 1.00 4.62 77.256 77,683 300 0.50 57,496 140 051 9217 78,201 300 0.81 157,120 _ 1.00 4262 81,324 76,700 315 0.48 88,511 1.00 0.61 0,670 .78.833 315 0.78 155030 1.00 462 85,300 73.548 330 0.46 89,482 1.00 0.51 10,138 79,344 330 0.76 160,683 1.00 4.62 69,450 71.227 345 0.45 60,417 1.00 0.51 10,599 77,818 346 0.72 162.361 1.00 452 93,523 60,839 360 '0.43 91,317 1.00 0.51 16,060 00,257 360 0,70 163,978 1.00 452 67,589 66.389 375 0.42 92,166 1.00 0,51 11,621 80,865 375 0.60 165,538 1.00 4.62 101,055 83853 390 0.41 93,025 1.00 0.51 11,062 61,043 390 0.66 167,046 1.00 4.62 105721 61,324 406 0.39 63,837 1.00 0.61 12.443 81.396 405 064 160,504 1.00 452 100.787 65716 420 0.35 04,024 1.00 0.61 12903 81,721 420 _ 082 169,917 1.00 4.52 113,664 56,063 436 0.37 95,389 1.00 0.61 13,304 02.024 436 561 171,226 1.00 452 117,020 53,366 450 0.36 _ 96,130 1.00 0.51 13,826 62.304 460 0.50 172620 1.00 462 121.965 50,634 .466 0.35 95851 1.00 0.51 11,220 62,565 465 057 473.014 1.00 402 120,062 47.562 460 0,35 97.662 1.00 0,60 14,747 82,805 460 0.56 175,174 1.00 l 462 130.116 45056 495 0.34 05236 1.00 0.50 16,206 63.025 466 0.56 178,402 1.00 l 452 134105 42.217 610 0.33 69,002 1.00 051 15006 83,233 560 0.64 177.596 1.00 I 4.52 136251 30,317 525 0.32 09552 1.00 0,61 18,129 163.422 625 052 175765 1,00 1 462 0(x317 36.448 540 0.32 100,186 1.00 061 16,500 83.598 640 0.61 170,901 1.00 1 4,52 140.303 33,521 565 0.31 100,806 1.00 _ 051 17.061 83,755 645 0.50 151,016 1.00 4.52 160,449 30658 570 0.30 101,412 6.00 061 17,612 83,990 570 0.40 152,106 1.00 462 154616 27680 565 0.30 102006 1.00 0.61 17,073 64.033 586 040 153,171 1.00 452 150682 21,590 000 0.29 102,586 1,00 861 16433 84,152 000 0.47 164,213 1.00 4.52 12.648 21,505 615 0.20 103,154 1.00 051 10.694 84,260 615 0.46 165.234 1.00 l 462 100,714 16,619 630 0.30 103,711 1,00 0,51 19,366 84356 630 0.46 185234 1.00 4.62 175780 15463 555 O28 104,257 1.00 061 19616 84,441 845 0.45 107,214 1.00 4,82 174847 1;368 660 027 104,790 ' 1.00 051 20,277 84,516 600 0.44 185176 1.00 452 175913 9,264 875 0.27 105,318 1,00 0.51 20,730 84,581 875 0.43 189,120 1.00 4.62 182.979 6,141 690 0.26 105834 1.00 0.61 21.190 64,636 650 0,42 190.047 1.00 4.52 187.045 3,002 705 025 100311 1.00 0.51 21,869 64.802 706 0.42 193,957 1.00 162 191.111 -154 720 0.25 105Rip 140 050 22,120 64,719 720 0.41 191.651 1.00 4.52 195178 4326 736 0.25 107.329 1.00 0.51 22551 84,746 735 0.40 192,730 1.00 4.52 199244 -5513 750 0.24 107,810 1.00 0.61 23,042 84,766 _ 750 540_ 193,506 1,00 1 462 203,310 -0.715 765 0.24 100,254 1.00 0.51 26603 84,781 766 0.39 194,445 1.00 I 462 207,376 -02,931 _ 781 0.24 105749 1,00 0.61 23,963 84,786 780 0.38 105201 1.00 4.52 211.442 -16,161 726 023 109206 1,00 0.61 24,424 i 84,784 796 836 196,106 1,00 i 452 215509 -19.404 610 0.23 109659 1.00 061 74,885 94,774 010 0.37 198,916 1.00 1 4.52 216575 •22,869 625 0.23 110,104 140 0.51 25,346 y 44,758 8226 037 107,714 1.00 I 462 223,041 -25,827 640 0.22 110.542 1.00 051 25607 -I 84,73 640 036 195501 1.00 I 4.52 227.707 -29,207 e 865 022 110.974 140 0.61 28,258 --_- 84.706 556 036 195276 1.00 4.52 231.773 -32498 070 , 022 111,399 1.00 051 26,728 84,671 670 0.35 200.040 1,00 452 235,840 45,600 • 066 0.72 111.819 1.00 0.51 27.109 64.630 886 0.85 200.79D 1.00 4.52 239.906 40.113 900 0.21 112x33 1.00 0.51 27,860 54,562 000 0.31 201.536 1.00 452 743,072 X243 11d.fM Moor 04raa.Volume 1[93442). 84,769 Mod.IAA Iola Storage Voltars(cubic tit= 02231 Nod FAA Mar 6404.9.Volum fear..#.). tam Mod.FAA N .Storage Vakanc here-h)= 7.1173 UDFCD DETENTION VOLUME ESTIMATING WORKBOOK Version 2.03•Released February 2008 UT1-13ebn6m_BLain MA,44oa5ed FAA 3056006 1224 PM •`..r&,......,,., i [�r�� NTtdN VUKtE BY I?IE I�IOfF7tS FAAlE7NOD •- =,i1.4. ,�. 3 i={See VSdCM VOt6 =Serage. apti er g7. ,a.11O9n tADO'. , • J • Project: Mead Town Center Basin ID:Developed Basin A4 / Inflow and Outflow Volumes vs.Rainfall Duration 300,000 -- —�.__..------ • • • 250,000 • • tt 200.000 ( : -- • '•d►• . • • 111 _.�. . . ,. m m LL • U 150,000 o • • .. • . -_ l • 100.000 _ — i I• _ _ • r •m ,ilIt O000pooO _.. j•.... . . .... ..,..- ••• .800000 7.QA.9O.Q. 000000000 bO000Oa000 coor:0 --- 1.. •-- - 6 0°t ' ; --4,11 • • 4j 50,000 1 • -4,I;i,.••• ' I , l ••. . • 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 Duration(Minutes) , -9- em Storms Inflow Varese -8-Minor Storm Outflow Volume o Minor storm storage Volume M -IP-Maier Stain In/ow Volume -t-Myer Storm Outgrew Vohmme • Myer Storm Storage Volume J 0 UDFCD DETENTION v0LUME ESTIMATING WORKBOOK Version 2.03,Released February 2008 UO-Del•rabn Bon Al,la.Mod7nd FM 315.7008.1 24 PM DkTENT10N „ ..4 f'{ 0.1',,i'''+ 5 3. c intt ,,Ak.')A34:1 .: 1See 0pCM Vohime'25�4 Mi TtYK N� di,s f') Project: Mead Town Center Basin 33:Developed Basin B1 (For catchments less than 160 acres only. For larger catch menu,use fiydrograph routing method) 55�� (NOTE:for catchments larger than 90 acres.CUHP hydrogreph and routing are recommended) ti:7k00471 ,..84i..9ib. Wk ooluntl00111g 66o�flcd FAIMethnC *-',17;.:446V R Defetltl/1ioon.. :116h �`FM M6fJ1oJ.. �.�: n Information(boot)- Deakin Information(Input(; Calderon(D.b0g.Innbersbusness I. ISIMall pour( CatcMrrt On4trepe Imparvioson►sa I,= 62.00 loath Colhnen(Damage N0 A=lear.re L'-Yi,c.75 aa r Drainage CatdvntDrainageMa ege A• 16.600 acres Predevorrw MR CS RCS 502 Group Type'Wr.ttA I A B,C.as D Pre4evtbpner4 NRCS Sol Group Type• B A,B.C.d 0 Rehm Prod for Detail tide Control r• . :p�s,,yews(2.5,10.25,50,a 100) Return Peeiod to Detention Contra I.•L., �; yearn(2.5.10.25.50,w 100) Tare of Concentration of Watershed Tc• ',-, •'n nrw. r of Corx00001<,n of Welerv.ed Too 15 as:notes Allowable Uret Release R.1. q- v,b _.. Ch/... Allowable Unit Release Rat. Precipitation Pi-=EMI brdra Ore,.o,a AecgRaem P.• 0v2r6;;?Y7-':-n47.ea Design Rainfall 1OF F eon ola t•C,'P,/(C,.T,)'C, Dealpn Rainfall 101.1on0,Aa I•C,'PAC,.L.3=C, Coefficient One C,- 26.5O%' Coeffcirt Or.. C,• 2610 Co.lf et(Two Cr•' : 10'..i=. Coefficient Too Cr• 10 Cwen Thre e C,= ...:0.703. C Ock.t Twee C.• 0.789 Determkeat on of Average Outflow from 1110 Basin(Calculated!: Determircat10n of Average Outflow horn the Beshl1Calculatedl• Runoff Cow art C• 065 Rural('sett.art C. 072 Inflow Pee)Runnel Op^• 3953 da I rdwv Peak Runoff 09.0. 70.90 eta Abw.N.Pak Ou18aw Rate Op-o.6- 0.57 do Allowable Pak Outflow Raw Opcul• 5.04 d. Mod.FAA Minor Str.O.Vol ms a 0,602 eu61c fool Mod FAA Major 5wr.9.Vd..n 0 102,900 rnW0 AN Mod.FAA Minor Stengs• 2171 acre-fl Mod.FAA Meld Storage VolLe e)• 2.362 ere-R I)-' 16'x;.1 r-Enter 8.00.0 0..etia,.roennns.Worms.Value Hat.(a 5,for I)fircnes) Rental Rainfall Inflow Adkntn.nt Akre. allow Strove Reinfa9 R..del Irtlow AdjuslnMN Avwagm Outflow SMfap. Gumboil Irt•nsty Vdenn. -Fea6n 0.Ilbw Volume Vcluno U.alon Irtemty Vedur a Fedor O1t60n Volume Worn mi1W.a .wise I h cubic feel dm cubic bet were feet mimes :cross 1 le oat.feel di orble 108 eel*WA ) {otrlpUl 100005) 10001 l0ADA1 (3.401) (•ud0t1 (jowl) touWAl (ovtputl (nu'pnl l.wwt] (05000 Isdot01 7,4 ' 0.00 0 0.00 o 00 0 0 0 000 a 000 ) 0 ao 0 0 IS 3.62 35,370 1,00 067 514 35,062 IS 5.67 62,66. 1.00 1 5.04 4.636 69,346 30 2.50 49,107 1.00 0.57 1.026 49,079 30 4.06 89,161 1.00 5.04 9,072 M104 45 1.00 57,294 1.00 0.57 1.642 66.752 46 816 102,06) 1.00 6.04 13,600 W.275 60 1.61 62.150 1.00 0.67 2,068 61,100 60 2.50 113.409 1.00 6.04 10.144 96,265 _ 76 1.36 67.732 5.00 067 2.570 65,162 75 2.23 121,626 1.00 E 6.04 22,680 96,046 se 1.21 71,497 - 1,00 057 3,064 60.412 90 1.97 120.317 1.00 ) 6.04 27.216 101.171 106 1.09 74,704 5.00 0.57 3,099 71,105 105 1.76 134.146 1.00 f 6.04 31.762 10,304 120 0.99 77,504 1.00 0.67 4.113 73,361 120 1.60 139,174 1.00 f 5.04 36,288 102,688 136 000 79,994 1.00 0.57 4,627 76,366 136 1.47 143,646 1.00 i 5.04 40,624 102,622 150 0.64 62240 100 0.67 5.141 77,100 150 1.36 147,079 1.00 4 5.04 46.360 102.319 166 0.78 64,299 1.60 0.57 5,655 76,634 166 126 161,366 1.00 I 6.04 49,896 101,462 100 6.73 60.176 1.00 057 6,169 W006 100 1.16 154,744 1.00 ( 5.04 54,432 100,02 196.3 069 67,924 1,00 017 6,663 61.241 196 1.12 157,064 1.00 6.04 51966 90.910 ,S 210 0.66 84668 1.00 0.67 7.197 82,366 210 1.00 180.616 1.00 _ 6.04 83.304 00.311 225 0.62 91.067 1.10 057 7.717 63,375 216 1.00 183,584 1.00 5.04 88,010 9,524 240 059 92,330 1.00 0.67 622b 84.304 240 ‘.- 0.96 161150 1.00 6.04 72.079 93,580 255 3.60 181,646 1.00 017 4739 86.756 266 051 001606 1.00 # 6.01 77,100 91.493 270 0.64 95,192 1.00 0.67 9.253 65,039 270 067 170,936 1.50 k 5.04 51,640 80,216 28 2655 0.62 06,427 1.00 017 9,756 09,660 5 064 173,164 100 i 6.04 80.104 06.970 300 0.50 97.007 1.00 0.57 10,262 67,326 300 0.00 176,273 1.00 604 90.720 64,553 3)6 0.46 00,787 1.00 0.57 10.790 97,841 3)6 0.79 177,302 1.00 6.04 01256 0046 330 , 046 99,621 1.00 0.57 11,310 61St) 330 0,75 179246 1.00 104 99,79! 74456 346 0.45 100.963 l 1.00 067 11,924 80,04 345 672 161,120 1.00 5.04 104,326 76,792 360 0.43 101,80 1.00 0.57 12.336 . 84530 360 0.70 162.624 2.00 5.04 100.8644 74.050 376. 042 10283'7 1.00 0.67 12,662 60.065 - 375 016 164,664 1.00 6.04 _ 113,400 r 71,264 390 0.41 103,773 100 0.57 18366 90407 390 0.68 190,345 1.00 5.04 117.916 60409 406 0.30 104,679 1,00 0.57 18000 94719 406 014 187,972 1.00 6.04 122472 66,600 420 • 0.35 ' 006.667 1.00 0.67 14,304 91,163 420 0.62 109,649 1.00 614 127,006 62,641 4W 0.37 106,409 1.00 067 14.006 01101 436 011 191,071 1.00 104 131144 51634 460 0.30 007,236 7,00 067 16.422 91,614 450 0.59 192.664 1.00 6.04 134080 68,414 406 0.36 101040 1.00 037 15,906 92,104 465 0.57 104,006 1,00 6.04 140116 63,310 • 480 0.36 101823 1.00 057 16,451 9,373 460 0.56 191414 1.00 5,04 546,152 60,262 _ 496 0.34 100.506 1.00 0.67 11966 92.621 495 955 106.703 1.00 614 140,666 47,006 510 0.36 510329 1.00 0.67 17,479 02.850 510 0.51 191117 1.00 6.04 154,224 43,883 575 0.32 111,054 ' 1.00 0.67 - 17,903 01061 521 012 100,410 1.00 5.04 ' 156,700 40,669 540 022 111.762 10D 017 06,607 67,256 640 061 200,600 1.00 6.04 002.200 37,304 666 031 112,463 1.00 0.67 19.021 93,432 566 0.60 201,032 1.00 6.04 167,832' 34,100 1 670 0.30 113,129 1.00 0.57 19,536 83.504 570 0.49 208146 1.00 6.04 172366 30.776 586 0.39 113,701 1.00 0.57 20049 00,742 566 0.48 204,334 1.00 5.04 071004 27.430 600 029 114,436 1.00 0.57 20.563 90,575 600 0.47 206,496 1.00 6.04 161,440 24,060 016 029 110,072 130 0.57 21,077 03,995 015 0.46 201636 1.00 104 181076 70,660 630 0.20 , 116094 110 0-57 21,501 04.102 630 0.45 207,751 _1.00 6.04 190.612 17,239 048 0.29 , 110.303 1.00 0.67 22,105 04,197 645 0.46 201145 top I 5.04 192,046 13.797 600 t 027 111000 1,00 0.57 71,620 94,261 660 0.44 209,916 1.00 5.04 100,594 10.334 676 027 117,487 1,00 0.67 28134 94,363 676 0.43 210.971 1.00 5,04 204,120 1661 600 026 111062 100 0.57 23.648 94,416 100 042 212,006 1.00 5.04 200.656 3.349 705 026 111a26 1,00 057 24,162 94,466 706 0.42 212.020 100 604 212.192 -172 720 0.26 119.163 1.00 0.57 24,676 94.507 720 0.4) 214,017 1,00 104 _ 217.726 -3,711 736 6.25 110.729 1.00 0.67 25,190 04,530 736 0.40 214,660 1.00 5.04 222264 -7,266 750 0.24 120266 100 067 26,704 94,562 760 0.40 215,062 1.00 5.04 220.600 .10336 765 0.24 120794 110 0.57 21210 54,676 766 0.36 216.611 1.00 104 231,336 , -14,426 700 0.24 121,314 1.00 0.67 20.732 04,562 700 0.36 217,844 1 1.00 5.04 236.672 .10.029 705 023 121120 110 0.57 27.246 94,579 706 0.36 216,262 100 ( 104 240406 .21,846 010 0.23 122,329 1.00 057 27.760 _ 94.500 610 0.37 210,687 0.00 004 244,644 -25277 625 023 122525 I 1.00 0.57 20,274 91,551 625 0.37 220,667 0.00 - 6.a 240.400 -21,923 00 72 0 0 123,314 1.00 0.67 28,768 94.626 040 V 0.36 221,435 1.00 0.04 264,016 .73,561 666 0.72 123,796 I 1.00 017 29,303 94,491 065 036 222,300 1.06 601 261662 .8662 570 0.72 124.270 I 1.00 I 0.57 20,617 94.454 670 036 223,162 1.00 5.04 263.060 -31935 606• 0.22 124.730 1-00 0.57 __ 30,331 94,407 686 0.36 723,982 1.60 504 267.624 -43.022 9000 0.21 125,200 1.00 0.57 30.645 01,365 900 034 I 224.021 i 1.00 i 504 272,160 I .47,339 Mod.FAA lake.Storage Volume(ruble 6)• 0,582 Mod FAA Malec stone 0.441..)erh5e N. 102,40 Mod.FAA Moor Stomps VOhtm.(.ore-11). 21713 Mod.FAA Maid Storage Valor 2.3416 UDFCD DETENTION VOLUME ESTIMATING WORKBOOK Version 2.03,Released February 2008 010 Oeb.40n_5asn 81 ado.MoA4od FM 315/2005,125 PM .s 7 7�Y r4t H `` '4 w-1 DETENTi t.UM Tit 'ED��1A,(`Wi `y e raw' 1.,h `#x `', F=;,"2°;;;."� y may. t)t4 O E BY �� y- *+f I i s .�-z,�• a.1a gi34 ,.# eel .c+ a;j t 11ar t Se✓:11.SOC111 vwwne�zs e : _.__.Te,•s;cQ�11T'�iR ` > .. ',fir.: } .& , x rF -sib-` Project Mead Town Centerdill) — — /BSSYIID:Developed Basin BT Inflow and Outflow Volumes vs.Rainfall Duration 300,000 . • 250.000 —. _.__ 200,000 --•- • • • V . 0150.000 • -.._. • , E . D _ I • .. .... O I > :. .. I . ._. E .; - __.. _..... . 100.000 �• ♦.• �� .• t. • fl0000000000g000b0000g00000 •000000000aoOO • la a._• 50.000 .•,.• i t •� 1 ttr • • a. o • 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 Duration(Minutes) $Mtnur Storm Inflow Volume -6-Minor Storm Outflow Volume 0 Minor Storm Stooge Volume -0.-Major Stan Yellow Volam. f MaJor Storm Outflow Volumes • Major Sloan Stomp.Volume. 0 UDFCD DETENTION VOLUME ESTIMATING WORKBOOK VersIon 2.03.Released February 2006 UD-0eter nn Bash B1.i4:5 ModFed FAA 7/512'0011.1.75 PIA STORAGE DRAINAGE CRITERIA MANUAL(V.2) the calculated 100-year volume. Others require that the 100-year volume be added to the WQCV. All jurisdictions require the WQCV be added to the 5-or 10-year volume. When clear written local criteria on this matter are absent,the District recommends that no less than 50%of the WQCV be added to the calculated 100-year volume for 100-year volumes obtained using empirical equations and the FAA Method. However,unless the local jurisdiction requires adding all or part of the WQCV to the 100-year volume obtained using the simplified Full Spectrum Detention design; District does not recommend adding any part of the WQCV to the 100-year volume. When the analysis is done using hydrograph routing methods, each level of controls needs to be accounted for and the resultant 100-year control volume used in final design. 3.2 Sizing of On-Site Detention Facilities 3.2.1 Maximum Allowable Unit Release Rates for On-Site Facilities The maximum allowable unit release rates in the Denver area per acre of tributary catchment for on-site detention facilities for various design return periods are listed in Table SO-1. These maximum releases rates will apply for all on-site detention facilities unless other rates are recommended in a District- approved master plan. For regional facilities see Section 3.2.5. Allowable unit release rates in Table SO-1 for each a soil group in the tributary catchment shall be area- weighted to composite the allowable unit release rate for the total catchment. Multiply this rate by the total tributary catchment's area to obtain the design release rates in cubic feet per second (cfs). Whenever Natural Resources Conservation Service(NRCS)soil surveys are not available, approximate their equivalent types using results of detailed soil investigations at the site. Table SO-1—Maximum Unit Flow Release Rates(cfs/acre)from On-Site Detention Facilities Design Return NRCS Hydrologic Soil Group Period (Years) A B C & D 2 0.02 0.03 0.04 5 0.07 0.13 0.17 10 0.13 0.23 0.30 25 0.24 0.41 0.52 50 0.33 0.56 0.68 100 0.50 0.85 1.00 3.2.2 Empirical Equations for the Sizing of On-Site Detention Storage Volumes Urbonas and Glidden (1983), as part of the District's ongoing hydrologic research, conducted studies that evaluated peak storm runoff flows along major drainageways. The following set of empirical equations provided preliminary estimates of on-site detention facility sizing for areas within the District. They are • (SO-8 (June rev.)01/2007 Urban Drainage and Flood Control District LARGE MAPS AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING AT THE CLERK TO THE BOARD'S OFFICE, IN THE PUBLIC REVIEW FILE. 061L-ELL IWCI YVd RLPUL(COO 3NOHd d-Ias was ld�ss oWl doc,da.d., „ ° lbf11d3ON00 © � CD SW TI11MSRS ivNI ddv NOII NW I90,nrll c HD31 ‘R1131 K $ OL3WW003NNOLLY dd NOLLtl%3NNV wudvo x and NOLLW3NNVxo on u �y� OW NOLLtlX3NNtl 1(ONIf103 U sLr I IVLIWSn6 NOLLVaIIdd0 NOLL'OGNNV ssarrvsz I w3ry do NMOl:OuI NN AS NOLLAINOS3a 3.ra ANN 311'aNVI%OMna3]ONC) 1.2 i z z t yo 5 & o N jihfflfl O k3 c � � w 1 e _ II 2 J Fill , W I I I JLU I � , I ( � ��' \ C‘a N II III s • > l �I 11 I i i :\ �\ > --IV aIIy'-' ill-,'N A' \It-aY , ) �� bF a i- I Ill I 3 3 I J 7` III o E - h) H I) 1'` I Z \ ° % I IV — I < O c I 11 F I I U > � \ II � I iI eI 0Lc- i u _ w %�_ 1 la f l Ii' J III III I — v �II �� w`� Qo IIIiI II awl i a / a''t Il �_� 2 � �. 7 W � h 'I ;� 4 I �i' \� - /top � • II I II '/ i ' 1� J,I I tlII °,a � lip O3 C ; w I III II wab € o� I I I :III dd �� I a+ I II I I i II , I 1 _I _� � � N. I „I.r I Lt AY ICI $ ci . 1 I ' Y h 1 ir%%% `� 11 —. III i H od_ 1 H W� RsLT FL-) I � ` IIa ("w31- c3 I1 / • D itciig2 HI • 1O t . X_ ,I W I IQ � l ' a 1idd II 7/ QO I / nZ ��r, a l 8 aw 2 ' , . F lel F , ' i ; ckLici I Y III° `, II , S > d III I F ) T1 A IIII • I n I, / il E i ��I o ° d't, .- d II r ,t i I `�l \ H %� J II 1 99 r o 1 �I 1 I el 11 �,�'T tat I 1 3M i M NV3dSONOI An. LLVOOI XO - I II I� — _ e isimmusej 11- _ 1..1ry I �i`IC� 3'J •1F L'y l�N(�!f f--� �'_—,.f<.A.� 119 .,ate \\ J `�\' oD c ._913#Oll1d01311--3__'�� I ` 13` /�//'/ L 2i�M 1� 4�r 11 _ I -IF)I 3NIlNd.VM dSONOI 3tti pd °2 1 V I I I o,0 / I { '� �1 L 11 -, I _ T = I O I - I w ° I O I m < SYIS YANONtl Areal': 1511 SILL-N00:InOAV1 DMO' 1d3.N 0]LRI3.q S'Tho.pd DMY 100.WW2-k£4Vd:ONIMYWO 64 5S L'91 NM'MMNIIN • Statement of School Impact The proposed development will generate approximately 444 students. This is based on a student yield of 0.430 for single-family detached units and 0.37 students for single-family attached units. The yield is itemized as follows (185 single-family detached units and 958 single-family attached units): Number of Yield Rate* Projected Student Student Facility Percent of Units Yield Standard Standard Capacity SFD SFA SFD SFA SFD SFA Total Elementary 185 958 0.22 0.20 40.1 191.6 231.7 525 students 44.1% Middle School 185 958 0.10 0.09 18.5 86.2 104.7 750 students 14.0% High School 185 958 0.11 0.09 20.9 86.2 107.1 1200 students 8.9% Total 0.43 0.37 80 364 444 *-Student Yield Rates based on criteria provided by Saint Vrain Valley School District dated April 2008. • 232 elementary students or 44.1% of the standard capacity of a 525-student elementary school. • • 105 middle school students or 14.0% of the standard capacity of a 750-student middle school. • 107 high school students or 8.9% of the standard capacity of a 1200-student high school. • P:\133_26064_08001 Mead Place\Deliverables\Annexation\Statement of School Impact.doc Equinox Annexation and Rezoning PA's 1-6 PUD • Development Impact Assessment Statements July 17, 2008 General Site Location and Description The annexation portion of the Equinox Annexation and Rezoning PA's 1-6 PUD is located in the southwest quarter of section 22, Township 3, Range 68 West of the 61h Principal Meridian, Town of Mead, County of Weld, State of Colorado. More specifically, the site is bounded by Weld County Road 7 to the west, associated land that is being rezoned and included as part of the Equinox Rezoning PA's 1-6 PUD application and State Highway 66 to the south, existing agricultural vacant land and 1-25 to the east and Mulligan Lake and existing large lot residential to the north. Strategically located at a newly realigned interchange of Highway 66 and 1-25, this project will act as a source of energy to the up and coming activity center of Mead. The proposed PUD (PA's 1- 6) includes 113.1 acres of residential and mixed use development with a maximum of 1,143 single-family detached and attached residential units and 568,617 square feet of commercial, office, civic, and retail space. 20.1 Water Demand At this time, the Equinox Annexation and Rezoning project, PA's 1-6 PUD, is located within the service district of the Longs Peak Water District(LPWD). The LPWD is scheduled to install a transmission line from north to south through the Mead Place development adjacent to the Highland Ditch. The applicant is coordinating with the LPWD to make a connection into the new transmission line. It is the applicant's intent to pursue the use of a secondary non-potable irrigation system within • the development. This system may be contained on site, or may be part of the non-potable irrigation system that will be pursued through the Longs Peak Water District or the Highland Ditch Co. 20.2 Sanitary Sewer Demand Currently, the Equinox Annexation and Rezoning development, PA's 1-6 PUD, is within the Town of Mead Sanitation District boundary. Two parcels with in the project are also included in an IGA boundary with Saint Vrain Sanitation District (SVSD). The applicant is presently petitioning to get the entire project included in the Saint Vrain Sanitation District's 208 service boundary. The applicant is requesting the Town's support and assistance in this petition. Servicing the Equinox development through SVSD will allow the sanitary sewer to be a gravity system as opposed to a pumped and force main system if the proposed property were served through the Town of Mead Sanitation District. The applicant has contacted the SVSD Engineering Manager to confirm the capacity of the district's 'North Line'which will service the project. Currently, the 'North Line' is built through the Mead Crossing development and terminates on the south side of SH 66 just east of the proposed development. Off-site improvements will need to be constructed in order to make a connection to the existing sanitary sewer system. Table 20.2.1 provides the projected maximum sanitary sewer demand for the project. • 1 • Table 20.2.1: Sanitary Sewer Demand Land Use Rates Residential Commercial Residential Commercial *Demand (units) (acre) (gal/unit/day) (gal/acre/day) (gal/day) Equinox Annexation and Rezoning 1,143 77.9 270 1,100 317,300 PA's 1-6 PUD 20.3 Natural Gas Natural gas will be provided by Xcel Energy. The applicant has met with Nicci McManigal of Xcel Energy and confirmed that the subject property will be served by Xcel Energy. Xcel Energy has existing gas service lines in the State Highway 66 and Weld County Road 7 corridors as well as a gas regulator station north of the project site near the Town of Mead. 20.4 Electric Demand Electric service will be provided by United Power. The applicant has contacted Monica Hanson with United Power and a "will serve" letter is attached. 20.5 Telephone Qwest will be the communications service provider. The applicant is currently in contact with Barton Garner of Qwest. The proposed project will be served from existing infrastructure near the Town of Mead. A"will serve" letter is attached. 20.6 Streets • The PUD plan proposes one full service, one three-quarter turn and one right-in/right-out access point along State Highway 66 and two full service access points on Weld County Road 7. The more southern of the two access points on Weld County Road 7 is envisioned as a roundabout that will serve the Equinox Annexation and Rezoning PA's 1-6 PUD and Mead Place to the west. The roundabout is intended to promote safer speeds within the community and to reduce turning movement and wait times at the Weld County Road 7 and State Highway 66 intersection. The roundabout will direct the majority of traffic on Weld County Road 7 into the Mead Place and the Equinox Annexation and Rezoning PA's 1-6 PUD developments. The northern entrance is intended primarily as a residential entrance to accommodate the remaining residential traffic associated with this project traveling north on Weld County Road 7. Thus, the character and amount of traffic on Weld County Road 7 north of this site is intended to remain similar to today's standard. Preliminary discussions of the plan with the Colorado Department of Transportation and the Town of Mead staff have been very positive with the understanding that improvements along State Highway 66 and Weld County Road 7 will be necessary to serve the development. Mead Development Group has also begun discussions with CDOT about obtaining access permits for State Highway 66 and is aware of the permit application process. A copy of the Traffic Impact Analysis from LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc. is included in this submittal package for your review. • 2 20.7 Drainage • Currently, the Equinox Annexation and Rezoning properties primarily consist of agricultural farmland with associated homesteads and buildings. Per the Town of Mead Drainage Master Plan, dated July 1998, the proposed development is within two drainage basins. Historically, the southern portion of the site, approximately 16 acres, discharges to the south under State Highway No. 66 via existing culverts where flows are directed to Foster Reservoir and ultimately St. Vrain Creek; the northern portion of the site, approximately 94 acres, sheet flows from the southwest to the northeast and discharges into Mulligan Reservoir. Mulligan Reservoir discharges into an open ditch to the north where flows are directed east under Interstate 25 and ultimately to Lake Thomas and St. Vrain Creek. There is a parcel of land south of State Highway 66 that is included in the Equinox Annexation and Rezoning PA's 1-6 PUD application. This parcel of land is primarily encumbered by the Highland Ditch and is planned to remain as undeveloped open space. Developed flows will be detained, treated for water quality and released at the 10-year historic discharge rate per the Town of Mead construction standards. All detained flows will follow historic drainage patterns. Please refer to the Preliminary Drainage Report for Equinox Planning Areas 1-6 Planned Unit Development, dated July 17, 2008,for more detailed drainage information. The proposed project is adjacent to a FEMA designated floodplain for Mulligan Reservoir. The floodplain is designated as Zone A. No base flood elevation is determined for this floodplain and the horizontal delineation for this floodplain is approximate. All proposed development for the Equinox Annexation and Rezoning project will be out of the Mulligan Reservoir floodplain. 20.8 Law Enforcement The proposed property is currently under the protection of the Weld County Sheriffs Department. • Law enforcement will be provided by the Town of Mead through its contract with the Weld County Sheriffs Department. 20.9 Fire The proposed property is within the Mountain View Fire Protection District. The applicant has contacted the Fire Marshal and Fire Chief about service to this property. There is a possibility that a portion of land may need to be donated for fire protection use. The Fire District will follow up on this topic during the referral process after the initial annexation application submittal. 20.10 Parks and Recreation The Town of Mead requires that .08 acres of open space per residential unit and 8% of the total commercial area be dedicated as parks or open space. We understand that"parks"means developed open space with recreational facilities and "open space"means land generally left in its natural state or with very low intensity passive uses, and the balance between terms is worked out for each development. Using the basis of 1,143 total built residential units and 568,617 square feet of mixed use space built on a maximum of 52.4 acres, the total required parks and open space dedication, based on the Town of Mead standards, for this project would be: 1,143 x .08 acres = 91.44 acres for residential 52.49 x .08% = 4.19 acres for mixed use = 95.63 acres for Total Project(84.6% of the total site) Due to the unique nature of this project and the larger, overall benefits it will bring to the Town, a PUD is being implemented. This PUD modifies the parks and open space requirement to be based on a straight twenty percent for the overall project area in order to allow for feasible • development to occur in the project. The PUD will incorporate the vision for an active civic area 3 that provides developed open space benefits, a potential recreation center, as well as, traditional • parks and open space areas. Please refer to the PUD document for specific details. The open space and park areas provided will conform to the intent found in the Town of Mead Comprehensive Plan. A variety of parks, open space, trails and possible recreation center will be provided within this project and will contain elements of both active and passive play, such as playgrounds, open turf areas, ball courts, picnic areas, etc. Connections between parks and open spaces will be provided through an internal trail system, utilizing a combination of sidewalks along streets and off-street trail corridors. Pedestrian corridors and alternatives to vehicular travel will be emphasized to access nodes and activity centers within the community. Detention areas will be provided throughout the site, but will not count towards the required open space and park areas. Any oil and gas well setback areas will also not count towards the required dedications. 20.11 Environmental Considerations A Phase I Environmental Assessment has been performed on this property and no concerns have been identified except standard oil/gas well criteria. 20.12 Economic Development Potential Economic development opportunities attributable to this development include: • Business and Job Creation: Up to 568,617 square feet of commercial/retail/office/civic space will be constructed as part of this development, thus creating up to 568,617 square feet of new business activity and new job opportunities within the retail, service, governmental, construction, and professional industries. • Customer Base Expansion: New and existing businesses will also benefit from the development in that an estimated 2,743 new residents will live in Mead, contributing to the customer base that supports local businesses. • • Revenue Generation: In addition, the Town of Mead will benefit from the standard municipal revenues associated with new construction and development activity, estimated at$798,488* dollars. Recurring revenues associated with this development are estimated at$3.6 million* dollars annually. * Revenues are based on Form D-4. Some factors on this form are unknown, thus the actual revenues that could be generated are expected to be higher. P:\133_26064_08001 Mead Place\Deliverables Annexation\Develop Impact Assessment Statements_NK.doc • 4 • INITED • POWER Your Touchstone Energy'Partner Klbi April 1, 2008 Mr. Josh Sherman,E.I.T. Tetra Tech 1900 South Sunset Street,Suite 1-F Longmont, CO 80501 Dear Mr. Sherman: United Power is the provider of electric service in the area to the proposed Mead Place-Town Center project located at the NE intersection of CR 7 and HWY 66. The electrical distribution in • the area may need to be upgraded depending on the requirements of the site and in providing capacity and safe reliable power to the area. Service will be provided according to the rules,regulations, and policies in effect by United Power at the time service is requested. We look forward to this opportunity to provide electric service. If you have any questions, please give me a call at 303-637-1336. Since ly,&tai /n Monica L. Hansen District Representative UNITED POWER,INC. PO BOX 929 • Brighton,CO 80601 303-659-0551 • 800-468-8809 • fax 303-659-2172 www.unitedpowercom (MOM>MAR 0 2008 8:21/ST. 0:20/140.7600000082 P 2 3/3/2008 • Qwest Bart Garter QQ �� Field Engineer Qwest. Spirit of Service RE:MEAD TOWN CENTER Tetra Teck Josh Sherman This is a will serve letter for Mead Town Center_ Qwest will provide service for the Mead Town Center .This is planned to be annexed by the town of Mead. Qwest requests plans to be submitted to allow Time for engineering and construction to take place on a reasonable schedule. Bart Gamer Field Engineer Qwest Communications 303 255 6122 • 3 \ EQUINOX ANNEXATION AND REZONING PA's 1-6 PUD • Development Compatibility Statements July 16, 2008 General Site Location and Description The annexation portion of the Equinox Annexation and Rezoning PA's 1-6 PUD is located in the southwest quarter of section 22, Township 3, Range 68 West of the 6'"Principal Meridian, Town of Mead, County of Weld, State of Colorado. More specifically, the site is bounded by Weld County Road 7 to the west, associated land that is being rezoned and included as part of the Equinox Annexation and Rezoning PA's 1-6 PUD and State Highway 66 to the south, existing agricultural vacant land and 1-25 to the east and Mulligan Lake and existing large lot residential to the north. Strategically located at a newly realigned interchange of Highway 66 and 1-25, this project will act as a source of energy to the up and coming activity center of Mead. The proposed PUD (PA's 1- 6) includes 113.1 acres of residential and mixed use development with a maximum of 1,143 single-family detached and attached residential units and 568,617s.f. of commercial, office, civic, and retail space. 7.1 Street Master Plan The PUD plan proposes one full service, one three-quarter turn and one right-in/right-out access point along State Highway 66 and two full service access points on Weld County Road 7. The more southern of the two access points on Weld County Road 7 is envisioned as a roundabout that will serve the Equinox Annexation and Rezoning PA's 1-6 PUD and Mead Place to the west. The roundabout is intended to promote safer speeds within the community and to reduce turning movement and wait times at the Weld County Road 7 and State Highway 66 intersection. The • roundabout will direct the majority of traffic on Weld County Road 7 into the Mead Place and the Equinox Annexation and Rezoning PA's 1-6 PUD developments. The northern entrance is intended primarily as a residential entrance to accommodate the remaining residential traffic associated with this project traveling north on Weld County Road 7. Thus, the character and amount of traffic on Weld County Road 7 north of this site is intended to remain similar to today's standard. Preliminary discussions of the plan with the Colorado Department of Transportation and the Town of Mead staff have been very positive with the understanding that improvements along State Highway 66 and Weld County Road 7 will be necessary to serve the development. Mead Development Group has also begun discussions with CDOT about obtaining access permits for State Highway 66 and is aware of the permit application process. A copy of the Traffic Impact Analysis from LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc. is included in this submittal package for your review. 7.2 Subdivision Plan Details of the specific Subdivision Plan are unknown at this time. A maximum of 1,143 residential units are allowed within PA's 1-6. Within PA— 1, 185 Single-Family Detached Units are allowed. The minimum size of lots along the northern perimeter boundary will be 10,000 s.f. and the minimum size allowed in the rest of the planning area is 4,500 s.f., although many lots are anticipated to be larger. Single-Family Attached Units are allowed in the other planning areas to provide a transition in use and density to the mix of uses, including commercial, office, retail, and civic, anticipated in PA's 2-6. The inclusion of the Single-Family Attached types will bring a variety of housing types to the Town, thus increasing the diversity of options available to residents. The neighborhoods and mixed use areas will be designed to take advantage of and preserve the • views to Mulligan Reservoir and the Front Range Mountains. 1 r 7.3 Comprehensive Plan . The proposed project is compatible with the Town's Comprehensive Plan in several ways and meets several of the Comprehensive Plan's Goals and Objectives: Community Character Goal: To create and sustain a community with a friendly, small-town atmosphere or character. 1. Adopt measures that promote citizen interaction typical of`small town"/"Main Street" communities. The proposed project creates a central main street/civic area that will provide gathering places for residents to interact and civic areas to hold public events such as the Town Easter Egg Hunt. The scale of the proposed mixed-use area will maintain the small town atmosphere. 2. Find, promote, and create things that make Mead unique. The Equinox Annexation and Rezoning PA's 1-6 PUD will create a unique place within Mead and will be a unique mix of residential and mixed-use areas that will distinguish Mead from other shopping areas on the Front Range. Visual interaction and connections to the Mulligan Reservoir will be incorporated to meet this end. Environment and Natural Resources Goat To develop a balanced approach to growth which integrates new development into the natural environment. 1. Preserve and enhance areas of natural beauty or resources for leisure, passive recreation, education and research. Provide appropriate buffers around these resources to protect their • quality. The Mulligan Reservoir area will be preserved. Visual connections will be provided to it and possible walkways near the perimeter will allow the feeling of closeness without actual intrusion into the lake. Buffer areas will be provided along the perimeter where the property lines are nearby. A trail system will be incorporated into the open spaces that will provide leisure and recreation opportunities. View shed areas will be preserved to maintain views to the Front Range Mountains. 2. Provide appropriate open space buffers within the community that addresses the goals and objectives of an open space plan. Appropriate landscape and/or open space buffers will be provided along the project edges and natural resources to meet the objectives of the open space plan. Transportation Goal: To create an efficient, safe, and economical transportation network for the movement of people and goods within the Town's planning area and surrounding region. 1. Provide a transportation network that is coordinated with adjacent communities, Weld County, and the State of Colorado to ensure safe and convenient travel and reasonable access throughout the area. The proposed transportation network through the central/core civic area will consist of residential and commercial collectors and local streets designed to specifically accommodate the anticipated users of this area. Connection points to Weld County Road 7 and State Highway 66 will be limited to reduce increased traffic on these roads. A roundabout on Weld County Road 7 is anticipated and will reduce traffic wait times while enhancing the safety of . vehicles on this street. 2 • 2. Require land development to bear a proportionate share of the cost of provision of new or improved street systems to accommodate the development. Mead Development Group anticipates bearing the proportionate share of the cost of the provision of new and improved streets to accommodate the development of the Equinox Annexation and Rezoning PA's 1-6 PUD. 3. Consider the provision of innovative transportation features, such as roundabouts, traffic calming, and so forth, where appropriate. A roundabout on Weld County Road 7, as well as possible roundabouts within the interior of the project, are anticipated to be built. Other traffic calming features, such as curb bumpouts at intersections and pedestrian speed tables may also be incorporated. 4. Establish a pedestrian/bicycle system which separates pedestrian and bicycle traffic from automotive traffic as much as possible and links residential areas with key community facilities. Pedestrian and bicycle access and circulation will be separated as much as possible from vehicular traffic. A trail system via individual trail corridors and sidewalks will offer alternative options to link residential areas with the mixed-use areas, as well as park areas. Land Use Goal: To provide a range of compatible land use activities which are respectful of the natural environment, coordinated with supporting infrastructure, and provide a fiscally balanced pattern of development. 1. Establish a pattern, character, and density of land uses organized around accessibility, • environmental conditions, site conditions, location, community facilities, public utility capacity, traffic impact, and public safety. A site analysis is preformed by a variety of consultants to advise on the most appropriate uses of the land given the environmental and site conditions. The PUD Plan and future, detailed plans will incorporate the advice of these consultants. The proposed land uses will be organized around accessibility and community facilites. 2. Diversify Mead's tax base through development of well-planned and designed commercial development along Stage Highway 66, Interstate 25, Welker Avenue east of WCR 7, downtown, future regional arterials, and other major collector streets and intersections where appropriate. The Town's tax base will increase through the development of up to 568,617 s.f. of non- residential mixed-uses, such as commercial, retail, office, and civic land uses. This will primarily occur along the north side of State Highway 66 and east of Weld County Road 7 in the southern half of the project area. 3. Establish and maintain orderly transitions in use and density between existing and new developments, or in the layout of new developments, to avoid abrupt changes in character. The PUD Plan is designed to provide transitions in density from existing uses and planned uses. The lowest density development will occur on the northwest edge near the existing large lot residences. Density will progressively increase to the south and east to provide the highest density nearest to the central core activity area. 4. Provide parks, recreational areas, and open space to meet the needs and demands of the residential population. Provide parks and open space to meet the needs and demands of the • business/day employment population, but not necessarily public recreation facilities for them. 3 A minimum of 20% open space and parks (in addition to private open space areas on individual lots)will be provided within the project area. This will include a variety of spaces, • such as parks, trails, open spaces, civic interaction areas and a possible recreation center for public use, including business/day employment populations. 5. Consider flexible ways of regulation residential density in the promotion of lot size and housing types. The Equinox Annexation and Rezoning PA's 1-6 PUD proposes lot sizes and density that is different that what the Town's Land Use Code currently allows. These changes will allow a wider variety of housing types to occur in the Town. Housing Goal: To provide a range of housing opportunities of quality construction for a vital community. 1. Encourage a diverse housing stock which provides fora balanced range of housing opportunities that encourage the preservation of the character of existing neighborhoods and the development of future neighborhood forms which develop as a result of market demands. The Equinox Annexation and Rezoning PA's 1-6 PUD proposes lot sizes and density that are different than what the Town's Land Use Code currently allows. These changes will allow a wider variety of housing types to occur in the Town that can encourage a variety of lifestyles and user groups to live in Mead. The final mix of housing types within the project will be influenced by residential market demands. 2. Encourage new housing developments to present a character of public and private living environments consistent with good examples of patterns of developments. The Equinox Annexation and Rezoning PA's 1-6 PUD will incorporate a variety of public and • private living spaces that are associated with good examples of development patterns. These will incorporate a variety of housing types, housing product within types, parks and open spaces, pedestrian connectivity, and a balance of non-residential uses within easy accessibility for residents to encourage lifestyles less dependent on vehicles. 3. Consider an anti-monotony ordinance for housing construction in single-family detached subdivisions. The Equinox Annexation and Rezoning PA's 1-6 PUD contains Housing Diversity Standards and a separate Design Guidelines document will be created during the platting phases. Economic Development Goal: Promote a healthy and sustainable tax base to provide goods and services to meet the demands of area residents. 1. Promote enhancement of the tax base through economic development efforts to attract commercial establishments along State Highway 66, Interstate 25, Welker Avenue east of WCR 7, downtown, future regional arterials, and other major collector streets and intersections where appropriate. The Town's tax base will increase through the development of up to 568,617 s.f. of non- residential mixed-uses, such as commercial, retail, office, and civic land uses. This will primarily occur along the north side of State Highway 66 and east of Weld County Road 7 in the southern half of the project area. 7.4 Land Use Code The proposed project uses the Town's Land Use Code as an underlying basis. A variety of additional standards are proposed in the accompanying PUD. These additional standards • generally reflect additional road configurations not previously encountered in the Town, setback 4 • changes to accommodate a wider variety of housing options, and open space standards that • become necessary with the higher range of densities proposed. 7.5 Existing and Adjacent Land Use The existing land use of the Equinox Annexation and Rezoning PA's 1-6 PUD is generally agricultural on vacant land. A handful of single-family detached residents exist on these properties. Existing landowners are under separate contract agreements with Mead Development Group, and it's assigns, to accommodate their individual needs through the review and development process. Adjacent Land Uses include large lot single-family detached to the north; agricultural and vacant land directly to the east; the approved Mead Place PUD to the west, which will include commercial, mixed-use and single-family detached and attached residential; and an approved commercial and residential project with Centex Homes directly to the south, across State Highway 66. • • 5 •;' TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS MEAD TOWN NT MEAD, COLORADO ■ <fl Z_ wor TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS, INC. :, LSC TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS, INC. lAli IA i 1889 York Street Irimow Denver, CO 80206 (303) 333-11115 \ ► FAX (393) 333-1107 r a--- r'61 ; w! E-mail: Ise@lscdenver.rom �� Web Site: http://www.lsedenver.com TRANSPORTATION A CONSULTANTS, INC. €x I March 8, 2007 w Mr. Todd DeNeui * Lordson Corporation I 383 Inverness Parkway, Suite 470 Englewood, CO 80112 Re: Mead Town Center iiiti Mead, Colorado "'°p (LSC #070010) lv'.a 1 rt Dear Mr. DeNeui: c LiJi We have completed our Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) report of the proposed Mead Town Center ,I development to be located in the northeast corner of the State Highway 66 (SH 66)/Weld • County Road (WCR) 7 intersection in Mead, Colorado. This site is presently within the juris- r diction of the Town of Mead, Colorado and this report has been prepared in accordance with their requirements. This study first provides a summary of the existing roadways and traffic volumes in the vicinity of the proposed development, followed by estimates of the amount and '1I directional distribution of vehicular traffic likely to be generated. This information is then DI combined with projected future traffic volumes in the vicinity to evaluate the impact of the new tpl development on the existing and future roadway system and, where appropriate, to make r recommendations for the necessary roadway improvements. (.4 We trust that our findings and recommendations will assist in the planning of the proposed r development. Please call if we can be of further assistance. Respectfully submitted, a LSC Transpor ' ts, Inc./®� wrap 3�8/° t, 7 :a, 35827 V: q dd--- 4.91 oea. By: 3, enjamin . , .E., PTOE p' ttl Ni 0 BTW/SM /wc " -.h O:ALSCVProjects\2007V070010\Report\Town CanterATOT-Mead Town Center.wpd , S �y4 W�'e TEA 5�jy� Qq� V p {^� El £?wP .a'a :"G,"!.Much.pN,s.l x a''aa4 f teaty F i.Yff W.�t Mal�ft"V.YF'YFI+%i.J.11WEE�. zlt L. -'n'4 A Traffic Impact Analysis Mead Town Center Mead, Colorado • Prepared for Lordson Corporation 383 Inverness Parkway, Suite 470 Englewood, CO 80112 Prepared by LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc. 1889 York Street Denver, CO 80206 (303) 333-1105 • March 8, 2007 (LSC #070010) • TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Description Page A Introduction 1 B Roadway and Traffic Conditions 2 C Trip Generation 7 D Traffic Distribution 9 E Traffic Assignment 11 F Traffic Impacts 16 G Recommendations 23 H Conclusions 24 Appendix A: Traffic Counts Appendix B: Capacity Analysis LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS Figure Description Page • 1 Vicinity Map 4 2 Existing Traffic, Traffic Control, and Lane Geometry 5 3 Year 2030 Background Traffic 6 4 Directional Distribution of Site-Generated Traffic 10 5 Year 2030 Assignment of Site-Generated Traffic 13 6 Pass-By Trips 14 7 Year 2030 Total Traffic 15 8 Year 2030 Average Daily Traffic Impacts 18 9 Year 2030 Recommendations 19 LIST OF TABULATIONS Table Description Page 1 Estimated Traffic Generation 8 2 Existing Intersection Levels of Service 20 3 Year 2030 Intersection Levels of Service 21 0 • SECTION A Introduction The Mead Town Center mixed-use development is planned for a parcel of land located to the northeast of the intersection of State Highway (SH) 66 and Weld County Road (WCR) 7 in Mead, Colorado. The development is proposed to contain 425 single-family dwelling units, 685 multi-family dwelling units, 1,140,000 square feet of retail space, and 476,000 square feet of office space. LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc. has been retained by Lordson Corporation to prepare a Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) of the development, consistent with the require- ments of the Town of Mead and the Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT). This traffic impact analysis identifies the impacts of the development on the surrounding roadway system and describes its access requirements. Specific steps taken in this analysis process are described below: • • A review and analysis of present roadway and traffic conditions in the vicinity of the site. • A determination of the amount of peak-hour and average weekday traffic that would be generated by the proposed development and an analysis of the directional distribution of that traffic on the surrounding roadway system. • A projection of future background traffic volumes on the adjacent street system for Year 2030 to estimate the long term impacts. • A determination of future traffic impacts associated with the proposed development. These impacts are based upon estimates of the total amount of traffic on the surrounding roadway system in the vicinity of the develop- ment. • A determination of street and access improvements that will be necessary to mitigate the traffic impacts associated with the proposed development. • Mead Town Center(LSC#070010) March 8, 2007 LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc. Page 1 • SECTION B Roadway and Traffic Conditions The location of the proposed Mead Town Center development is shown in Figure 1. Also shown in Figure 1 are other known developments in the vicinity of the proposed site. Access to the site will be provided from one full movement access on SH 66 on the south; one 3/4 restricted movement access (no left-turns from the side street to SH 66 allowed) from SH 66 to be lined up with the proposed 3/4 access from the Kiteley Ranch develop- ment on the south; and three full movement accesses from WCR 7 on the west. Area Roadways Major roadways in the vicinity of the site are described below with a brief discussion of anticipated future roadway improvements. Existing lane geometry and traffic controls are shown in Figure 2. • • SH 66 is a two-lane east-west roadway with continuity from SH 36 on the west to SH 85 on the east. The Colorado State Highway Access Code classifies SH 66 in the vicinity of the site as a Regional Highway (R-A). The posted speed limit in the vicinity of the site is currently 60 mph. • WCR 7 is a two-lane north-south roadway with continuity from WCR 26 on the south to SH 60 on the north. WCR 7 is classified as a two-lane minor arterial in the Mead Transportation Plan written by FHU in August, 2006. Its inter- section with SH 66 is currently signalized. • WCR 5 is a two-lane north-south roadway with continuity from WCR 26 on the south to SH 60 on the north at the northern boundary of Weld County. Its intersection with SH 66 is currently controlled with north/south-facing Stop signs. A full movement access on WCR 5 south of WCR 32 is proposed as part of the project. WCR 5 is classified as a major arterial and is projected to have two through lanes (one through lane in each direction) through Year 2030 in the Mead Transportation Plan. • WCR 5.5 is a two-lane north-south roadway which currently exists south of SH 66 and provides access to the Liberty Ranch development. A traffic signal is planned at the SH 66/WCR 5.5 intersection. • WCR 32 is an unpaved, two-lane, east-west roadway with continuity from WCR 17 on the east to WCR 3 on the west. WCR 32 is classified as a two-lane • minor arterial in the Mead Transportation Plan. Mead Town Center(LSC#070010) March 8, 2007 LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc. Page 2 • • Hunters Cove Road is a two-lane collector roadway which currently serves the residential development located east of WCR 7. The intersection of WCR 7/ Hunters Cove Road is controlled by a Stop sign on Hunters Cove Road. It is currently posted at 35 mph in the vicinity of the site. Existing Traffic Conditions Existing traffic volumes are also shown in Figure 2 and are based on manual peak-hour traffic counts performed by Counter Measures, Inc. in January of 2007. The raw count data is included in Appendix A. Figure 2 also shows existing daily traffic volumes on SH 66, WCR 32, WCR 7, and WCR 5, which were obtained from 24-hour road tube counts conducted by Counter Measures, Inc. in February 2004 (SH 66), November 2005 (WCR 5), and January 2007 (WCR 32 and WCR 7). SH 66 west of WCR 7 currently carries about 15,300 vehicles per day, WCR 32 east of WCR 7 currently carries about 400 vehicles per day, WCR 7 north of SH 66 currently carries about 2,650 vehicles per day, and WCR 5 south of WCR 32 currently carries approximately 1,050 vehicles per day. Future Traffic Conditions • Year 2030 was chosen as the long-term design year for the project. Year 2030 is the 20- year horizon used for most long range planning forecasts. Year 2030 background traffic projections are depicted in Figure 3. These future traffic projections were derived from the Year 2030 daily traffic projections shown in the Mead Transportation Plan by FHU, August, 2006. Note that traffic expected to be generated by the surrounding developments including Mead Place, Kitely Ranch, Liberty Ranch, and Liberty Property were added in calculating Year 2030 background traffic volumes. Back- ground traffic does not include the traffic expected to be generated by the proposed Mead Town Center development. • Mead Town Center(LSC#070010) March 8, 2007 LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc. Page 3 o CZ tait � � � ., 4� € m lT. 15 t Tirra 11 p�. ; } .--1".C .. �J • :11,4' r a4. U ril+..'4 3` 4L d ✓ .gyp y F'0 ♦ , .§„ - G a.Sit II a',44 i E=' r1:4%.1.7-7! k,. ;.:7_,..,;—.5-e-164411. .. r r r fie,-.. ,9� "' ,. -3.7,,,,-.-iiik‘x-%,\N\Dt, vy,,,,..t. ,:ix,k.,,;:c..,1 ,.:, t n\ ,�,yw t 1 t .� �A k \g ��A,.h�,\} h .tg 4 �J Z �y. -,,,i2 �s.1 kh^S �S u✓ - 3 yF �1,,,,,,,,, `15.1*--- •� ) _` `#\' -0; l C n - yo t gyp)X-' _ jx , +� ', �{_ of u� . ,-,,,,,..to. ��.L' �. �2 a �>�g rho tt a - „ if ‘74‘ r aka ti a u i w.. a • t o ‘ i.v;ifr;E •i � '. +6\{i,yS p kC: .( Ysdi ;:q4-...4 'a 1'l i ii t `� ✓��`+X, a' s µ� y 1 F t rx f ,./ *Ya a ars.r. ,, F v +Y� r' kr v P .ita. �� ;" V''��W.. y 1�t Y.+ V '5 i' 4 - S t"''`—� C - N""Fr f{ ._ Sffi Tdk• ` 4 j)�4 i L ' r s,,`y'* : iz 4 # r;11.+€11✓ — A f ;' fi x 0- +;,rte I' 'ail' ' v.-� - .11:'4-:'...%-.4.0 t " 'ylif t7 ^` s .7.-,q--?.7.,...6 M. '� y -�?' t. .0'11—' e."(`'i-eg ,� Ytr^ -CH ht^ ��,, ,t„0 �, 4 a„ , . b�" ' bQ , w A 'it 1 r Yrt. #pica y " `y-:. Ill;41• '� s ' � ' ralit;( ' $ �.,' -t .-.''• ` / to ,}?` aw at;."_:-.1. a`f 4:1„---' t k ice yry t ' A. F SV 'i rr1 �1` q a 1a �,y ^av x .4::,..t,�y Ha. } 4 i\ .wz �`';4.:40' 1' j4 1 - t'�s�ys.,`421 1_�,a}. :Xi ^a"F !^ t a't S7,'.3 v , .'..e}.- ''''4‘4244.' Y! lie 1 A 9.1r. I,* '- Pl i }$ ;±:: f' rtt,„ �cx 4`'x7H;?' a R`i, oJ31. -- . ' ' l'' ". �f � '� k.9 9/99f 'ka S r �. h „h "� y�'?� a '" i .,i,ot a�9 t h • it , , `ak`J, r t -t a nAlai r 4 _:e , ,. Ili w } 5 _ri �. F ` r st. Kl. a `£ t 4 P} 51 Et r� w �`9�3 .dye n t � -kT+Y 3a err ga Y .! „ Iic� �+ � 3 t Ak .1'D Zvi.i, . 11-4.t * ... _ t ' 3� -"`tt. �i-�""e '� ,, i buy s �2 �t?i 1, ., It..da„^g.y+. ^..- t, .h;6' i t s R. 4. Ta i e March 8, 2007 Page 4 Je N . s p o a) V • uo 4••=1p m �' o an alan p "uo cu Ala 1,1,2 Q1' C U U orn -*In TI- ce cri N o l l vlm —IL— mlm vlv -IN .X -- W oci �l -1 "l� ri�' -lfr tlm - mlN "11 r „in I lr olN /z� rio l 0VD rlo O ri 2 4_1 7",_+"\\ -__—__. - js _I O � � , i r m M 1 w4• L et v Ay 41 a4o\ 0 iN (t -11— r 0 ., y_ L _ 1 , mlN -O I 6, L NJM V 'Ci O L OiN un r- -E+++ �,\ • 7 7 M ,,Ni r C N f M r r ± TSXoM mlm " 0tn men OIN n' '\\\ ,p lgp ad" rl V mlv l mI .2 r Lo N 91) IL,T) a ,,Dly) 'Rla SDM j ? ~i V OA \ V o HI!' _l I1 r Nl'n -_-_-1 —i� y O Ho mil'- _ V N mr / �1 / 01‘13 Nl�n V- p_ / I I O NHN r�L NH fI u a a 61 't 10 (NI m a F 1 r _ ) v In Nl� TN �f r mla 0, E E ID w , mlv vl� Mlm Olv a rn s @@ ?Pr Nl� nl� o n > - 3 - (n ¢ fr • ) 0 ll Q Y II II II 0 It 8 W O r C7 O 17 W M NI m i0 J en N ^ 6 March 8, 2007 Page 5 en p U s • • — v re) s o 2& N nq U Om -E c ?-12 'n o 1 L N� •IN 1 O O OIM L t- �OM �N r Mio �� CO rti 1 inIM r_i� f u m O M --2 O f oltQ M ^ M K2I� — cz-I 1 --- — i N. _ ;— • cc• \ w• ,/ i � t f �1 Kw' ltn M1� ._- ��WIN �� 1 . J 1� MIM p��bjs. r N� • L a� j , a OO Hie) y 1 1 I O N M 0 NIN �f r MIM di vi L2DM rtIN In d' 1� M mo J1�— Mlo -I-) -nlin ^ v>m J C OIM vIIN V M I ,9,1',.:3, N M 1 0 O n Ts------^ ,� ,i� Ifr Nim �� 01n cc (-le- U N N o�� Oho �I� up w N N N M oio J1�— NIM N s11J L. W OIH^O, to n �O O is U OI• LnIN ii.) CIF- 1 t r N cIm M OIO OIO 1 O M V � � O , y M O0J NI IN -O I 'nI N U U G oIo �f r M�� mI0 NI� ? N m o o O` Cr O SIN O O J �I0 oIo N�M rI� O U I > Y Y n O O O O O MN -lfr -1? v D 2 O • OIM MINO N M m M IL IO o a m Lai z CD II`131r- _J NM March 8, 2007 Page 6 • SECTION C Traffic Generation The Mead Town Center development is proposed to contain 425 single-family dwelling units, 685 multi-family dwelling units, 1,140,000 square feet of retail space, and 476,000 square feet of office space. The amount of traffic that will be generated by the develop- ment has been estimated using trip generation formulae rates published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers in its report, Trip Generation, 7"' Edition, 2003. The results of the generation analysis are given in Table 1. As indicated in Table 1, the Mead Town Center development is expected to generate approximately 38,447 external vehicle-trips per day (19,224 entering and 19,224 exiting vehicles) in a 24-hour period. This includes 1,000 entering and 682 exiting vehicles during the morning peak-hour and 1,770 entering and 2,078 exiting vehicles during the evening peak-hour. • Due to the mixed-use nature of the site, there will be a sizeable percentage of internal trips, or trips that stay within the confines of the development (i.e., people from the residential part of the development may make trips to the shopping center). Procedures found in the ITE Trip Generation Handbook, 2004, were used to estimate these trips. The overall internal trip percentage was calculated to be 10 percent for the shopping center, 15 percent for the office space and 20 percent for the residential development, as shown in Table 1. • Mead Town Center(LSC#070010) March 8, 2007 LSC Transportation Consultants,Inc. Page 7 V - O Q O CO Co CO LN O O CO O N CD N. 0 0 9 = N C C J A Y Sc) DJ NI CO C a 3.) C (O O Co O� 0 C 0 m�2 N N N. 0 t co a W 0. co D -c a c ~ c 3 u) (0 0 0 N 0 OD N- 0) 0 0 0 O Z O O N N (O U) U 0 I L J c Y O 0 O > a O C Co 0 O To m a Co U) V L CoiU o p c C ai O (0 v co EU V N- C O) co N LU LO r V ICJ • a) D (U Q N N V tO (- > O N Q m m Co0 C Q 0 0 U O_ >. - m 0 i- . 0 0 0 o W CO .. m O 0 0 H CO a 0) L 0) To 0 c c -, 0 0 0 c -m a> a o UU O o J z0 — ,- r- N N 0 = U aa)) E Q ^ J N V n Co a O co N Co 0 W N xU o o ui 0 10 Z .O. O a) W C -O V a N )O v CD CO .0 0 d (a ` C N N CO Co d ) V (� 0 f0 u) a O O O c73- 0 O N LL 3 p (0 -C CO RQ co V O a O J (V CI) (OU Co CO CO H Q' F- .po o = O o 0 6 6 o dTo l0 O -- Y _ I— f0 N a) N O O m a co n 0) N- c CO E W CD 2c CO CO o L E F- 0 C) Q o � o o ..=- 1° 0 cQ -J a p-- is C -J W .6° C F 0 T L 0 I r CJ 0 Y• (0 Oir) m u) y N U Eas.W > 0 N 2- 0) N C O O Q 2 c o E m m E a) o C S L w E — c Ea)— m N- c o 3 .- 0 .C co Y Y ❑ ❑ C in E 0 0 o• 0 (0 (n LU a u, C a C L O Q V N- N Co y 0 ._ N C CI- 0 v m c n D D E a) m ,- CO 0- u) 0 0 ,- H O N [D D 2 N 0 0 . U >-U ,0 N O 0 E , D 0 O O mO (m - Om u) -C c - a c CO O E aa`)cu 9D a) Ec C . O c m m 0 U 0 L O c 0 Is 0 C CO (n U' fn N N C t O j m M O O O 3 N m 0 CA S J 0 m f- N N N.0.. 0 CO • C - ry 0 m v a 0 E O Z Z Z Z C D O o U E 0 n00a) Oym '5m • • c 0 2 o - -0 7 J -0 p � -E 0 0 >2 U D D D D L 3 U E m U .E 0 m m m m ~ ❑ m m O 0) O CO - J J J J II C O 0 0 0 a v a--) a - is; Ff I-- I- Y ❑ cH c o) m m m a 0 0 S 0 o 0 ,- N m V )U0 C--- • F- CO C) U) Z H Z ,.,. _- March 8, 2007 Page 8 • SECTION D Traffic Distribution The directional distribution of generated vehicular traffic on the roadways in the vicinity of the proposed Mead Town Center development is an important elements in planning its specific access requirements and in determining its traffic impacts on surrounding roadways and intersections. Major factors which will influence the traffic distribution include: • The site's location relative to the population and activity centers in Weld County and the surrounding areas. • The future roadway network serving the area. • The specific access and circulation characteristics of the development plan. Based upon the influences described above, Figure 4 shows the anticipated directional • distribution of traffic to be generated by the Mead Town Center development for the Year 2030 street network. As indicated, the following distribution of external site-generated traffic is assumed for this analysis: To/From Distribution West SH 66 25% East SH 66 30% North WCR 5 7% South WCR 5 10% West WCR 32 2% East WCR 32 3% North WCR 7 8% South WCR 7 5% Mead Place 10% • Mead Town Center(LSC#070010) March 8, 2007 LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc. Page 9 v c o • 3 0 o 0- C) F�' L O L a Z C v • 1 '4J — • W 40- O 0co cu U r% Nal 0 ct L szi V i e.i • -1 a) to j o 4....) ( _ I I <�_./ .Li) mwj ;Da,\ I-J &, I in illi _ _ H ti I L a � U <i L NDM t I z 0 r' r 5'5 ADM s • u to N N O 5 ADM N III N O c 0 c d 0- 0 a a) - n' c 0 t W 6 2 N 4 Q. J II Z LJ 3 O O A. w a 2 Y itt March 8, 2007 Page 10 • SECTION E Traffic Assignment Traffic Assignment Figure 5 illustrates the assignment of project-generated traffic. The assignment was derived by applying the estimates of the site-generated traffic from Table 1 to the directional distribution of site-generated traffic shown in Figure 4. Pass-By Trips Table 1 also shows pass-by trips which were calculated using the ITE Trip Generation Handbook. Pass-by trips are made as intermediate stops on the way from an origin to a primary trip destination without a route diversion. Pass-by trips are attracted from traffic passing the site on an adjacent street or roadway that offers direct access to the generator. Approximately 34 percent of the traffic generated by the shopping center is assumed to be pass-by trips as recommended by the ITE Trip Generation Handbook(Table • 5-4). Figure 6 shows the pass-by trips for the proposed development. Background Traffic As mentioned in Section B, background traffic is defined as the traffic on the roadways without any consideration of project-generated traffic. It reflects traffic from surrounding developments and an"improved"future roadway network. Figure 3 shows the Year 2030 background traffic. This figure does not include any of the traffic generated by the proposed development. As previously discussed, the background traffic projections shown in Figure 3 include traffic expected to be generated by the nearby developments including Mead Place, Kitely Ranch, Liberty Ranch, and Liberty Property. The Year 2030 has been selected as an appropriate analysis year for evaluating future traffic impacts. It represents the time at which the surrounding developments are expected to be completed and roadway improvements made. Total Traffic • For the Mead Town Center Traffic Impact Analysis, total traffic volumes are the sum of background traffic volumes plus project-generated traffic volumes. Project-generated Mead Town Center(LSC#070010) March 8, 2007 LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc. Page 11 • traffic from Figure 5 and pass-by trips from Figure 6 were added to the Year 2030 back- ground traffic volumes from Figure 3 to yield Year 2030 total traffic,with these quantities being represented in Figure 7. • • Mead Town Center(LSC#070010) March 8, 2007 LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc. Page 12 Li', •F.., U o • �o o a ao z. et V i Q U J y , v NIA �nI .�� m NI, J hlN en cv (/) --J J 04n0 K- L or I` �� f 'T-18 oN co 5.... CD ;gigr Rs I� I� Or. SZ, Ji O — • ., � w / \::i ; r9IM t E— % ' N 1CA I? N� in tv¢ `\ mNW ° I �Io pdH- M NbJ ^Ot i�o� i I l `&h LNJM t K �i l� 1 N0 c41 Im vMilg JIL MIv N _4 4_ e-IOJ OIOJ MIN IN� -.Itn sa5n O •ce ml Pi U _.------#'/2 N P 3 up LO R ,o hIM NMIM = N M N "IM —H s5)1DcoD _ NI`° I,-m c7 tr' NIM rV ti" (Dreg j L �IW ...914° cI^ t__ `,211; U V , V M cM —1i O NIN ip`o I O .. O ',ID' AIM Hop , J J �� _ Y ja ~ 14Im ,im NIO 0 0 O O '''''''''"---_ ; .‘„,,,..„. ....,._ N N s • a a o a a w u s w47) IS J NIM 4 March 8, 2007 Page 13 C ) 6- • — v� 0 .., .� o ov o�' L2.9 ^ p a, Q I J �Ip NIW CO v L- O W v NIm Cn U C rI o_ I ro K- M 7I" 1f ,-,10� h N r2 r I---- - 1 �a I NIA /-\ I OiL 11 EI J/� N LU t i N Ji < c°!VW ,oJ\ ( cola e Of Hos u ' ,i LNJM u Nr. ccww • ` 0 .•U Vo VD 2 6 N s>DM m 0 w c v s e a en Ito . . v oIn N^ D W to O -n U 0 c Q a O 2 3w v IT o 0° o o D O n O 9 NIO Y Y e �I" O a U • cc o !- 0 Q v W II Z e CD Is' t J N M s !.C ; March 8, 2007 Page 14 U s • :36. O _ s 3 ` O `� E [� O a~ c k Q� N h� N d in Plitnr in n CD I y �I� J �la NIN^ CD O U COHN N r 0IM VIO Jl J• 2I� NIQ Ink r -loirt —1, L-- 010 -I- 'Dr' ol� �f N v M Q Ml0 n o in f— ,T,p2 0Ia �oIW WIC 0 OrQ � sz-1 Jl ' I • i 4. ce i U I M enIN f (� (n II I N oh .� a mrow TJIL inlM \ _i zI o in A� ( i M�vN, a NI", 7"JS /l N f L aJM O \n \n \nl\n "'I'n z zi mIN QI", M Q ",I", ",IM ol� J 1(� NIN r\O PN rid O M� �M Cl) �If \Y/ Olln 01 an QM MU n N oI in (-4 „ --- -SSa5M—,. NIm 8m �f 01 • • �IQ SIN 3in rtIR u 47 't IN in NI0 I �Jm ai 010 JIL rIt "�M� .—} in I s a� w 212 olo 0 N 01M C Q Q 0l0 "lf(' oIo inn AIM w olo I� or _ill_ �I, .n 10 0 in in Jo y -ii-- C iti 0 MIS M N M C U 0 C NI„ nilo oIo �I� ol� Mfr M� a N r N N t 0 \p N Q N I O 1 O O " I" J "I� AIM 1J1L �I� Ala NIA O� � N O OIN' J L 0 0 in O O J NN AIM NN n rI en I_ I -6- 91 1 -1C Q �IN �1r- oIQ v v w 1 a. 8 • OIN '49 d F O` N 1. 0 v • Z 8 W Z F CD 0I $ J N M Y ii. March March 8, 2007 Page 15 • SECTION F Traffic Impacts Average Daily Traffic The traffic impacts of the Mead Town Center development can be expressed in terms of average daily traffic (ADT) volumes, in which project-generated traffic is shown as an increment of total traffic. These comparisons are shown in Figure 8. Traffic volumes for project-generated traffic and total traffic are compared with anticipated LOS"C" roadway capacity estimates. Level of Service Capacity Analyses A significant methodology for determining traffic impacts is to examine the Levels of Service at the individual intersections and access points that will be directly impacted by a development. To assess the traffic impacts of the Mead Town Center mixed-use development,intersection Level of Service analyses have been conducted at intersections • in the vicinity of the site. Intersection capacities have been analyzed in accordance with the requirements of the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM), using the methodology outlined in "Signalized and Unsignalized Intersection Capacities". The concept of Level of Service (LOS) is used as a basis for computing combinations of roadway operating conditions. By definition, six different Levels of Service are used (A, B, C, D, E, and F) with "A" being a free-flow condition and "E" representing the "capacity" of a given inter- section or traffic movement. Traffic volumes used in the analyses include those from Figures 2, 3, and 7. The lane geometry and traffic controls used in the analyses are shown in Figures 2 and 9 for Existing and Year 2030, respectively. The results of these capacity analyses are found in Appendix B and are summarized in Tables 2 and 3. • SH 66/WCR 7:This existing signalized intersection currently operates at a good overall intersection Level of Service (LOS"B") during both morning and evening peak-hours. By the Year 2030,with the improvements shown in Figure 9, this intersection is expected to operate at an acceptable Level of Service (LOS "D" or better) for all approaches during both morning and evening peak-hours with or without site- generated traffic. • • WCR 7/WCR 32: This unsignalized intersection currently operates at an excellent Level of Service (LOS "A") for all approaches during both morning and Mead Town Center(LSC#070010) March 8, 2007 LSC Transportation Consultants,Inc. Page 16 • evening peak-hours. This intersection is expected to operate at a very good Level of Service (LOS "B" or better) for all movements during both morning and evening peak-hours through Year 2030 with or without the addition of site- generated traffic. • WCR 7/Hunters Cove Road: This existing unsignalized intersection currently operates at an excellent Level of Service (LOS "A") for all approaches during both morning and evening peak-hours. This intersection is expected to operate at a very good Level of Service (LOS "B"or better) for all movements during both morning and evening peak-hours through Year 2030 with or without the addition of site-generated traffic. • WCR 32/Hunters Cove Road: This existing unsignalized intersection currently operates at an excellent Level of Service (LOS "A") for all approaches during both morning and evening peak-hours. This intersection is expected to operate at a very good Level of Service (LOS "B"or better) for all movements during both morning and evening peak-hours through Year 2030 with or without the addition of site-generated traffic. • SH 66/RTO Site Access: This right-turn-only restricted movement access inter- section is proposed to be constructed in conjunction with the construction of the site. All approaches of this intersection are expected to operate at a good Level of Service (LOS "C" or better) through Year 2030. • WCR 7/Road A: This site access intersection is proposed to be constructed in conjunction with the construction of the site. Our analysis shows that, as a Stop controlled intersection, the westbound approach is expected to operate at a poor Level of Service (LOS "F") during the PM peak-hour by the Year 2030. However, this intersection is proposed to be constructed as a roundabout. As a roundabout, all approaches of this intersection are expected to operate at a very good Level of Service (LOS"B"or better) through Year 2030 with or without the site traffic. • WCR 7/Road B: This site access intersection is proposed to be constructed in conjunction with the construction of the site. All approaches of this inter- section are expected to operate at a good Level of Service (LOS "C" or better) through Year 2030. • WCR 7/Road C: This site access intersection is proposed to be constructed in conjunction with the construction of the site. All approaches of this inter- section are expected to operate at a good Level of Service (LOS "C" or better) through Year 2030. • WCR 32/Road B: This site access intersection is proposed to be constructed in conjunction with the construction of the site. All approaches of this inter- section are expected to operate at a very good Level of Service (LOS "B" or better) through Year 2030. • Mead Town Center(LSC#070010) March 8, 2007 LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc. Page 17 <0 Cn o • o w �^ W O U MC 0 0 � L� O O N N O 0 p �. O Co ct O O K o W ~ OCV (� riC OO O 6-- 06- 0 V) O ^ N 0, a) V r M en co -- c -I 0 O �___---_�__ _ O N - 0 0 — � � 0 vl o �_ .l M N o E i ' I OO ,4:- o W1 co i I I cen rn in b of J _1 • • L. ' —' J / < <a�M 0 O 0 O �, ' 0 0 0 0 0 0 •I ;, ce I iuS 0 0 N K� 0 0 O 00 O SS NOM—".",... o 0 ^ o o o O N. U LO t5 N N tr, co 3 T T to h O_ co O 71 0 O 3 u V) h T.- C-14 v=i v O M co N O a a V N 0 0 N r K 0 S) M \ U 0 0 O O \ O O D a 0 cn en u w o N 0 0 . 0.)o O O CD N cs O O 11- 4 O N. M II 'n N O N.ln N � ^ O— 0 0 1,0 en O 9 vi N to R p C 0 e z o ui • # CD M W K J 4 March 8, 2007 Page 18 • v o � 3 M O O a u N 'ti{J' Si ,_ \cu c � 15,T cu U E / \ 1 + O ' i E J N � —,�1} M- row ¢ A4, i °I i Kji �,�e I . it -, 7 LXM ±• P _ L .`"n 4SS NJM_`.Z , i ��l- U \-,.. )N • - - c X)M a C 0 E N > a O- E a w J 4. C O U O U V co 0 N 2 0 a U N C O O a* O 2 • z n n ii n Pi W @ Y ! C March 8, 2007 6 Page 19 Table 2 Existing Intersection Level of Service (1) Mead Town Center Mead, Coloraodo (LSC #070010, March, 2007) Year 2007 Existing Traffic Level of Level of Traffic Service Service Intersection Location Control AM PM SH 66/WCR 7 Signalized Eastbound Left A B Eastbound Through & Right B B Westbound Left A A Westbound Through & Right B B Northbound Left, Through, & Right C C Southbound Left, Through, & Right C C • Entire Intersection Delay(sec/veh) 16.9 15.0 Entire Intersection LOS B B WCR 7/WCR 32 Unsignalized Eastbound Approach A A Westbound Approach A A Northbound Left A A Southbound Left A A Critical Movement Delay(sec/veh) 9.6 9.3 WCR 7/Hunters Cove Road Unsignalized Westbound Approach A A Southbound Left A A Critical Movement Delay(sec/veh) 9.9 9.4 WCR 32/Hunters Cove Road Unsignalized Eastbound Left A A Westbound Left A A Northbound Approach A A Southbound Approach A A Critical Movement Delay(sec/veh) 8.8 $ 8 Note: (1) Using 2000 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) methodology and Level of Service (LOS)definitions. • March 8, 2007 Page 20 0- Table 3 (page 2 of 2) Year 2030 Intersection Level of Service (1) (2) Mead Town Center Mead, Colorado (LSC#070010, March, 2007) Year 2030 Year 2030 Background Plus Background Traffic Site-Generated Traffic Level of Level of Level of Level of Traffic Service Service Service Service Intersection Location Control AM PM AM PM WCR 7/Road B Unsignalized Eastbound Approach B B B C Westbound Approach — — C C Northbound Left A A A A Southbound Left — — A A Critical Movement Delay(sec/veh) 12.0 13.4 15.0 24.2 WCR 7/Road A Unsignalized Eastbound Approach B B B D Westbound Approach — — C F Northbound Left A A A A Southbound Left — A A Critical Movement Delay(sec/veh) 12.7 16.2 21.3 Eastbound Approach Roundabout A A A B • Westbound Approach B B A B Northbound Approach A A A A Southbound Approach A A A A Intersection Delay(sec/veh) 6.2 8.7 6.7 10.1 Intersection LOS A A A B WCR 7/Road C Unsignalized Eastbound Approach B B B B Westbound Approach — — B C Northbound Left A A A A Southbound Left — A A Critical Movement Delay(sec/veh) 10.2 10.1 12.5 15.0 WCR 32/Road B Unsignalized Westbound Left — — A A Northbound Approach — — B B Critical Movement Delay(sec/veh) — — 10.1 11.6 Note: (1) Using 2000 Highway Capacity Manual(HCM)methodology and Level of Service(LOS)definitions. (2) Assumes two through lanes in each direction on SH 52. ' Delay more than 100 seconds • March 8, 2007 Page 21 0 Table 3 (page 1 of 2) Year 2030 Intersection Level of Service (1) (2) Mead Town Center Mead, Colorado (LSC #070010, March, 2007) Year 2030 Year 2030 Background Plus Background Traffic Site-Generated Traffic Level of Level of Level of Level of Traffic Service Service Service Service Intersection Location Control AM PM AM PM SH 66/WCR 7 Signalized Eastbound Approach B C B C Westbound Approach C C C D Northbound Approach A B B B Southbound Approach A B B C Intersection Delay(sec/veh) 14.4 19.9 15.8 33.4 Intersection LOS B B B C WCR 7/WCR 32 Unsignalized Eastbound Approach A A A B Westbound Approach A A A B Northbound Left A A A B Southbound Left A A B B Critical Movement Delay(sec/veh) 8.8 9.0 10.9 14.0 WCR 7/Hunters Cove Road • Unsignalized Westbound Approach B B B B Southbound Left A A A A Critical Movement Delay(sec/veh) 10.9 10.8 11.5 12.6 WCR 32/Hunters Cove Road Unsignalized Eastbound Left A A A A Westbound Left A A A A Northbound Approach A A B B Southbound Approach A A B B Critical Movement Delay(sec/veh) 9.5 9.5 10.6 11.2 SH 66/RTO Site Access Unsignalized Southbound Approach — — C C Critical Movement Delay(sec/veh) — — 10.7 21.3 SH 66/FMA Site Access Signalized Eastbound Approach — — B C Westbound Approach — B C Southbound Approach — — C D Intersection Delay(sec/veh) — 15S Intersection LOS 2 C 9 — — B Note: (1) Using 2000 Highway Capacity Manual(HCM)methodology and Level of Service(LOS)definitions. (2) Assumes two through lanes in each direction on SH 52. ' Delay more than 100 seconds • March 8, 2007 Page 22 • SECTION G Recommendations Access Recommendations Figure 9 shows the recommended Year 2030 traffic control and lane geometry at the major intersections serving the Mead Town Center mixed-use development. These recommendations are based on Year 2030 total traffic volumes shown in Figure 7 and the Colorado Department of Transportation(CDOT) State Highway Access Code,March 2002, assuming the current CDOT classification and speed limit for SH 66 (Non Rural Arterial (NR-A) with a posted speed of 60 mph). These improvements include the following which are likely either entirely or partially the responsibility of the Mead Town Center develop- ment: • SH 66/Full Movement Access: Construct westbound double left turn lanes, an eastbound right-turn lane with a length of 700 feet which includes a 300-foot taper length, and a traffic signal. • • SH 66/RTO Access: An exclusive westbound right-turn deceleration lane with a length of 700 feet which includes a 300-foot taper length; • SH 66/WCR 7: Construction of a second left-turn lane for the eastbound approach allowing for a dual left-turn (the cost of construction of this improve- ment should be shared between the Mead Town Center development and the proposed Mead Place development to the west); • WCR 7/Road A: Construction of a single-lane roundabout (the cost of construction of this roundabout should be shared between the Mead Town Center development and the proposed Mead Place development to the west). In addition, the following regional improvements are recommended: • SH 66 - Widen to four-lane roadway (two lanes in each direction); • SH 66/WCR 7 - Construction of double left-turn lanes for the westbound approach; • SH 66/WCR 5 - Signalization of the intersection and construction of turn lanes as shown in Figure 9. • Mead Town Center(LSC#070010) March 8, 2007 LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc. Page 23 • SECTION H Conclusions Based upon the foregoing analysis, the following conclusions may be made regarding the Mead Town Center development: 1. The Mead Town Center mixed-use development is planned for a parcel of land located to the northeast of the intersection of SH 66 and Weld County Road (WCR) 7 in Mead, Colorado (see Figure 1). 2. The Mead Town Center development is proposed to contain a maximum of 425 single-family dwelling units, 685 multi-family dwelling units, 1,140,000 square feet of retail space, and 476,000 square feet of office space. The site is expected to generate approximately 38,447 external vehicle-trips per day (19,224 entering and 19,224 exiting vehicles) in a 24-hour period. This includes 1,000 entering and 682 exiting vehicles during the morning peak-hour and 1,770 entering and 2,078 exiting vehicles during the evening peak-hour. 3. Access to the site will be provided from one full movement access on SH 66 on the south; one 3/4 restricted movement access (no left-turns from the side • street to SH 66 allowed) from SH 66 to be lined up with the proposed 3/4 access from the Kiteley Ranch development on the south; and three full move- ment accesses from WCR 7 on the west. 4. The following distribution is expected for the site generated traffic: To/From Distribution West SH 66 25% East SH 66 30% North WCR 5 7% South WCR 5 10% West WCR 32 2% East WCR 32 3% North WCR 7 8% South WCR 7 5% Mead Place 10% 5. Traffic control and roadway geometry assumed for Year 2030 is illustrated in Figure 9. Assuming the improvements shown on this figure, all intersections are expected to operate acceptably through the Year 2030. 6. The following improvements are likely either entirely or partially the responsibility of the Mead Town Center development: • Mead Town Center(LSC#070010) March 8, 2007 LSC Transportation Consultants,Inc. Page 24 . • SH 66/Full Movement Access: Construct westbound double left turn lanes, an eastbound right-turn lane with a length of 700 feet which includes a 300-foot taper length, and a traffic signal; • SH 66/RTO Access: An exclusive westbound right-turn deceleration lane with a length of 700 feet which includes a 300-foot taper length; • SH 66/WCR 7: Construction of a second left-turn lane for the eastbound approach allowing for a dual left-turn (the cost of construction of this improvement should be shared between the Mead Town Center develop- ment and the proposed Mead Place development to the west); • WCR 7/Road A: Construction of a single-lane roundabout (the cost of construction of this roundabout should be shared between the Mead Town Center development and the proposed Mead Place development to the west). 8. In addition,the following regional improvements are expected to be constructed by others by the Year 2030: • SH 66 - Widen to four-lane roadway (two lanes in each direction); • SH 66/WCR 7 - Construction of double left-turn lanes for the westbound approach; • SH 66/WCR 5 - Signalization of the intersection and construction of turn lanes as shown in Figure 9. • 9. Traffic associated with the construction of the Mead Town Center mixed-use development can be safely accommodated by the adjacent roadway network with the recommendations contained in this report. • Mead Town Center(LSC#070010) March 8, 2007 LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc. Page 25 • APPENDIX A Traffic Counts Counter Measures ?', Code : 8 i STREET: CR-S PAGE: 1 S ER: 50-66 FILE: CR-55566 h CIO Y: MEAD/WELD Movements bp: Vehicles DATE: 1/17/07 1__ From North From East From South From West Vehicle ;gin AT THEO LT HT TORO LT ET TRH LT ER THEO LT Total 1 0 11 0 0 0 123 0 0 0 0 0 133 3 270 5:45 18 0 0 0 146 1 0 0 0 0 157 1 323 I TOTAL 29 0 0 0 269 1 0 0 0 0 190 4 593 P...0 AN 20 0 0 1 152 0 1 0 0 0 175 4 353 1:1S 15 1 1 0 146 1 0 0 0 0 163 22 349 10 24 0 0 0 198 0 1 1 1 0 152 3 380 r 5 21 3 0 0 178 1 0 0 1 0 156 4 364 ( TOTAL 80 4 1 1 674 2 2 1 2 0 646 33 1446 1 0 AM 8 0 1 0 132 0 1 1 I 0 134 3 281 1:15 17 0 0 2 109 0 1 0 0 0 135 3 267 Break :00 PM 6 0 1 1 143 1 1 1 1 0 129 19 303 €'5 3 0 1 2 151 1 1 0 1 1 165 12 338 is 0 6 0 0 0 164 3 0 1 0 0 155 9 338 :45 5 0 1 4 170 1 0 0 2 1 163 15 362 ,TOTAL 20 0 3 7 628 6 2 2 4 2 612 55 1341 5 0 5 0 183 3 1 1 0 D 169 11 378 :1� 8 0 0 Z 193 0 0 1 0 2 177 12 395 '-1 8 0 0 0 206 1 0 1 2 1 171 14 404 i 7 0 0 1 146 0 1 2 0 0 122 16 295 TOTAL 28 0 5 3 728 4 2 5 2 3 639 53 1472 TOTAL 182 4 10 13 2540 13 8 9 9 5 2456 151 5400 0 Counter Measures " Code : 8 PAGE: 1 iTREET: CR-5 FILE: CR-55866 IF: SH-66 IT : MRAD/WELD Moveaents by: Vehicles DATE: 1/17/07 PEAK PERIOD ANALYSIS FOR THE PERIOD: 7:15 AN - 8:15 AM DIRECTION START PEAK HR VOLUMES .... PERCENTS ... FROM PEAK 80➢R FACTOR Right Thru Left Total Right Thru Left North 7:15 AM 0.77 68 4 2 74 92 5 3 East 7:15 AM 0.83 0 654 2 656 0 %100 0 South 7:15 AM 0.58 2 2 3 7 29 29 43 West 7:15 AM 0.86 0 605 32 637 0 95 5 Entire Intersection North 7:15 AN 0.77 68 4 2 74 92 5 3 East 0.83 0 654 2 656 0 %100 0 South 0.58 2 2 3 7 29 29 43 Vest 0.86 0 605 32 637 0 95 5 �I CR-5 ::;:i=: N S . ':::.::•:•:34;x.':' 68 4 2 6:i:Ef•iS:::::: i::r.;•:. 725 ..i: r fzm -. a SFI-66 656 654 32 L 2 7605 637 SH-66 :':= . .... 09 0 7 2 • AS CR-5 Counter Measures fie Code ; 8 PAGE: 1 STREET: CA-S FILE: CR-53066 . 'STREET: SR-66 II Ti; MEAD/VELD Movements by: Vehicles DATE: 1/17/07 PEAK PERIOD ANALYSIS FOR THE PERIOD: 4:00 PN - 6:00 PM DIRECTION START PEAK HR VOLUMES .... PERCENTS ... • FROM PEAR HOUR FACTOR Right Thru Left Total Right Thru Left North 5:00 PM 0.82 28 0 5 33 85 0 15 East 4:45 PM 0.92 6 752 5 763 1 99 1 South 5:00 PM 0.75 2 5 2 9 22 56 22 West 4:45 PM 0.96 4 680 52 736 1 92 7 Entire Intersection North 4:45 PM 0.80 26 0 6 32 81 0 19 East 0.92 6 752 5 763 1 99 1 South 0.67 1 3 4 8 12 38 50 West 0.96 4 680 52 736 1 92 1 CR-5 ; ?s N E S !0 61:::::_::x:;`;:: 26 0 6 io�ii}ti�N£ir.'ii:�S{r:�E'LLtii:rr,:}`�•r.:::::}:>tii � 32 'S ,Me.x.. ,:z;.. :•:•:. r 6 AR 3H-66 763 752 52 i L 5 680 736 SH-66 : # 4 687 7 :€5r;: 8 •::::: 9 4 3 1 • 65 4tnEf w E i p 51-0,E.I, 3 4- e S Md e V • 71 f R rnr - SS 'r Lin,1 ot 1 v t 0 cii- Counter Measures ite Code : 13 PAGE: 1 I STREET: CR-1 FILE: CR76066 I_ STREET: SH-66 IT. : MEAD/WELD Movements by: Vehicles DATE: 1/16/07 From North From East From South From West Vehicle egin PT THRD LT RT TURD LT RT THAD LT RT THRD LT Total 6 0 23 3 1 1 77 0 1 0 0 1 156 1 264 6.,5 42 0 5 1 88 0 1 0 0 0 171 9 317 R TOTAL 65 3 6 2 165 0 2 0 0 1 327 10 581 7 O AM 37 0 5 0 116 0 0 1 2 0 161 13 335 7:15 34 1 5 4 117 0 2 2 0 0 168 15 348 7.00 44 2 4 3 135 0 1 0 1 0 140 10 340 7 5 47 1 2 0 131 4 1 2 1 0 131 11 331 R tOTAL 162 4 16 7 499 4 4 5 4 0 600 49 1354 B 0 AM 19 1 2 1 127 0 0 0 0 1 109 7 261 B 5 14 0 2 1 115 0 1 0 0 0 124 9 266 Break I:u0 PM 20 2 2 1 148 0 0 2 0 1 119 18 313 1:15 10 2 3 3 134 0 0 2 0 0 125 27 306 I 0 13 2 1 4 168 0 1 0 2 1 131 29 352 ( S 8 2 1 2 164 1 0 1 0 1 134 24 338 I TOTAL 51 8 1 10 614 1 1 5 2 3 509 98 1309 S 14 0 2 2 192 2 1 0 1 0 156 31 401 5,� 17 0 1 2 141 1 2 1 0 0 125 33 329 5;30 12 1 0 3 154 0 0 0 1 1 123 35 330 is S 10 1 4 7 141 0 0 2 0 0 115 37 317 I _3TAL 53 2 7 14 634 3 3 3 2 1 519 _ 136 1377 Iv TOTAL 364 18 40 35 2154 8 11 13 8 6 2188 309 5154 0 Counter Measures to Code : 13 PAGE: 1 ! !TIBET: CR-7 FILE: CR7SH66 I 111: 5H-66 7Y : MEAD/WELD Movements by: Vehicles DATE: 1/16/07 PEAK PERIOD ANALYSIS FOR THE PERIOD: 6:30 AN - 8:30 AM DIRECTION START PEAK ER VOLUMES .... PERCENTS ... FROM PEAK HOUR FACTOR Right Thru Left Total Right Thru Left North 7:00 AM 0.91 162 4 16 182 89 2 9 East 7:15 AM 0.95 8 510 4 522 2 98 1 South 7:00 AM 0.81 4 5 4 13 31 38 31 West 6:30 AN 0.95 1 656 38 695 0 94 5 Entire Intersection North 7:00 AM 0.91 162 4 16 182 89 2 9 East 0.92 7 499 4 510 1 98 1 South 0.81 4 5 4 13 31 38 31 West 0.89 0 600 49 649 0 92 B CR-7 N asr:rr S • 61 :?` 162 4 16 182 7 r.„§ze...,,.,.... ......_ SH-66 510 499 ......... 49 L 4 i 600 649 5H-66 S'r: J0 13 4 5 4 • CR-7 Counter Measures :e Code : 13 PAGE: 1 TREET: CR-7 FILE: CRISH66 T P: RH-66 7/ • MEAD/WELD Movements by: Vehicles DATE: 1/16/07 PEAK PERIOD ANALYSIS FOR THE PERIOD: 4:00 PM 6:00 PM DIRECTION START PEAR HR VOLUMES PERCENTS ,.. FROM PEAK HOUR FACTOR Right Thru Left Total Right Thru Left North 4:00 P6 51 8 7 66 77 12 11 East 4:30 PM 0 0.87 10 671 4 685 1 98 1 South 4:30 PM 0.75 4 2 3 9 44 22 33 West 4:30 PM 0.89 2 546 117 665 0 82 18 Entire Intersection North 4:30 PM 0.85 52 4 5 61 85 7 8 East 0.87 10 671 4 685 1 98 1 South 0.15 4 2 3 9 44 22 33 West 0.89 2 546 117 665 0 82 18 CR-7g. N :::.: W+E S • *129 52 4 5 61 10 ::::::„................::::::................,.......„.......::::::::::::: ....,„ r .: SH-66 685 671 :::::::::÷x-:- ........................:. 117 L 4 1 546 665 SH-66 : 5 s : 2 i p9 3 2 4 sr 10 '::zir: • CR ::;:::s —7 atI9t6rciLi 611- ULP f p y�,. f - 5 x, 14 - Ito V <1 Counter Measures to Code : 16 PAGE: 1 STREET: BUNTERS COVE RD FILE: HUNTADAM . STREET: ADAMS RD (CR-32} .I T: MEAD/WELD Movements by: Vehicles DATE: 1/16/07 Trot North Fro® East From South From West Vehicle gin RT THRU LT RT PERO LT RT THRU LT RT THRU LT Total 0 0 1 0 1 4 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 9 :;5 0 3 3 1 2 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 12 TOTAL 0 4 3 2 6 2 1 0 0 0 3 0 21 , 0AN 0 2 1 0 1 3 1 1 0 0 5 0 14 ';15 0 4 2 0 5 0 1 1 2 0 4 1 20 •70 2 1 1 0 9 1 1 0 0 1 3 0 19 5 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 3 TOTAL 3 7 4 0 16 4 3 2 2 1 13 1 56 DAM 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 3 1 10 5 0 0 2 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 5 Break :u0 PM 0 0 0 0 7 1 0 0 0 0 2 1 11 :15 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 2 1 7 0 1 0 1 1 3 0 2 0 0 1 3 0 12 _5 0 0 0 6 2 0 1 2 1 0 3 0 15 TOTAL 2 0 2 7 13 1 4 2 1 1 10 2 45 i • 0 0 0 1 3 2 3 3 0 0 2 0 14 1 1 2 1 6 0 3 2 1 0 2 0 19 30 0 1 2 2 2 0 0 2 0 0 3 0 12 '; 5 0 0 0 1 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 5 .OTAL 1 2 4 5 13 2 7 7 1 0 7 1 50 TOTAL 6 14 16 14 50 9 17 11 6 2 37 5 187 • Counter Measures ite Code : 16 PAGE: 1 ' STREET: HUNTERS COVE RD FILE: HUNTADAM STREET: ADAMS RD (CR-32) ;I.7: MEAD/WELD Movements by: Vehicles DATE: 1/16/07 PEAK PERIOD ANALYSIS FOR THE PERIOD: 7:00 AM - 8:00 AM DIRECTION START PEAK HR VOLUMES .... PERCENTS ,.. FROM PEAK HOUR FACTOR Right Thru Left Total Right Thru Left North 7:00 AN 0.58 3 7 4 14 21 50 29 East 7:00 AN 0.50 0 16 4 20 0 80 20 South 7:00 AM 0.44 3 2 2 7 43 29 29 West 7:00 AM 0.75 1 13 1 15 7 87 7 Entire Intersection North 7:00 AM 0.58 3 7 4 14 21 50 29 East 0.50 0 16 4 20 0 80 20 South 0.44 3 2 2 7 43 29 29 West 0.75 1 13 1 15 7 87 7 HUNTERS COVE RD amN S • 3 7 4 lj:V.'._:Irifti.':.•i :':••:•'4 A•.'.•. ::.2.'(..'.'L:Y:'Y 21 "' f;;:: ADAMS RD (CR-32) 20 16 ....,... 1 [- 4 1 13 15 ADAMS RD (CR-32) J1 7 2 3 :. :12 fg f; r 2 • fe HUNTERS COVE RD Counter Measures to Code : 16 PAGE: 1 STREET: HUNTERS COVE RD FILE: HURTADAM STREET: ADAMS RD (CR-32) itMEAD/WELD Movements by: Vehicles DATE: 1/16/07 PEAK PERIOD ANALYSIS FOR THE PERIOD: 4:00 PH - 6:00 PM DIRECTION START PEAK HR VOLUMES .... PERCENTS ... FROM PEAK HOUR FACTOR Right Thru Left Total Right Thru Left North 4:45 PM 0.44 1 2 4 7 14 29 57 Bast 4:30 PM 0.78 9 14 2 25 36 56 8 South 4:30 PM 0.75 9 7 2 18 50 39 11 West 4:00 PM 0.81 1 10 2 13 8 77 15 Entire Intersection North 4:30 PM 0.38 2 1 3 6 33 17 50 East 0.78 9 14 2 25 36 56 8 South 0.75 9 7 2 18 50 39 I1 West 0.69 1 10 0 11 9 91 0 HUNTERS COVE RD :c;: 3;:: N t S • fa:ir fir ':: 2 1 3 ... ............................... . ............................. aaffEW— 18 r x.x.x.:.:.:.:.:.4z:K.:.:.s.:.:::::.:::::::::::.±::::::.:.s.x.:::::::::::::::::::::::::: Mg ADAMS RD (CR-32) 25 14 L 2 10 11 ADAMS RD (CR-32) OM J1 18 2 7 9 • -HUNTERS COVE RD oirt6r rviotto 0.00. P-0 fry N,Er Naas Q0 Ccti;) 5 t4 - 35" yKy\_..) yr Thl srop a, A t • Counter Measures to Code : 2 PAGE: 1 i (TREET: CR-1 FILE: CR-7ADAM t QTR ET: ADAMS RD (CR-32) IT : MEAD/WELD Movements by: Vehicles DATE: 1/16/07 Is Fro® North From East From South From West Vehicle Tin RT TRIM LT RT THRO LT RR TORO LT RT THE( LT Total ! 0 21 0 0 0 5 0 4 0 1 2 1 34 '43 0 23 1 0 0 3 0 7 1 5 0 0 40 TOTAL 0 44 1 0 0 8 0 11 1 6 2 1 74 : ' AN 0 28 0 1 0 2 4 9 0 2 0 1 47 ;15 0 19 1 3 0 3 3 15 2 3 1 2 52 " 1 38 2 5 0 9 0 12 0 0 2 2 71 2 31 0 0 0 3 2 10 0 0 0 0 48 TOTAL 3 116 3 9 0 17 9 46 2 5 3 S 218 AN 2 17 2 2 0 2 1 6 0 2 0 0 34 0 16 1 0 0 1 0 9 0 0 0 1 28 Break 00 PM 1 16 2 4 0 6 3 16 1 0 1 0 50 15 0 13 0 1 0 1 3 26 3 1 1 0 49 1 13 2 0 0 4_ 4 20 1 1 0 0 46 s,. 3 9 0 0 0 1 3 21 1 0 0 0 38 TOTAL 5 51 4 5 0 12 13 83 6 2 2 0 183 1 15 1 1 1 1 2 25 2 0 0 0 49 i1. 0 8 1 1 1 5 2 24 1 0 1 0 44 t0 0 10 0 1 0 0 2 35 0 0 0 0 48 1 12 0 2 0 1 3 35 1 0 0 1 56 4/TAL 2 45 2 5 2 1 9 119 4 0 1 1 197 I 'OTAL 12 289 13 21 2 47 32 274 13 15 8 8 734 0 Counter Measures ,te Code : 2 PAGE: 1 STREET: CR-7 FILE: CR-7ADAM ST ET: ADAMS RD (CR-32) IT ; MEAD/VELD Movements by: Vehicles DATE: 1/16/07 PEAK PERIOD ANALYSIS FOR THE PERIOD: 7:00 AM - 8:00 AM DIRECTION START PEAK HR VOLUMES .... PERCENTS ... FROM PEAK HOUR FACTOR Right Thru Left Total Right Thru Left North 7:00 AM 0.74 3 116 3 122 2 95 2 East 7:00 AM 0.46 9 0 17 26 35 0 65 South 7:00 AM 0.71 9 46 2 57 16 81 4 West 7:00 AN 0.54 5 3 5 13 38 23 38 Entire Intersection North 7:00 AM 0.74 3 116 3 122 2 95 2 East 0.46 9 0 17 26 35 0 65 South 0.71 9 46 2 57 16 81 4 Nest 0.54 5 3 5 13 38 23 38 CR-7 N S 3 116 3 ::Eie:c: :: ::s:>::: :n:-r::>:c•::::;:•::•:t•:. 122 9 _'{`�.ry.......:........ .:i....�....................... r _z5m..::::::;x: x . ...:..... ..4): ...z... 2'g::`: ADAMS RD (CR-32) 26 0 —, L 17 5 I 3 13 ADAMS RD (CR-32) ::: 5 57 2 i 46 9 :::::::::::::::::::::::55::@::::::K:::::::::::.:::::::±:::2::138 • CR-7 ... �: � s Counter Measures ,'^ Code : 2 PAGE: 1 STREET: CR-1 FILE: CR-1ADAM n S BET: ADAMS RD (CR-32) II 1: MEAD/WELD Movements by: Vehicles DATE: 1(16/07 PEAK PERIOD ANALYSIS FOR THE PERI00: 4:30 PM - 5:30 PM DIRECTION START PEAK HR VOLUMES .... PERCENTS .., FROM PEAK HOUR FACTOR Right Thru Left Total Right Thru Left North 4:30 PM 0.19 5 45 4 54 9 83 7 East 4:30 PM 0.54 2 2 11 15 13 13 73 South 4:30 PM 0.91 11 90 5 106 10 85 5 West 4:30 PM 0.50 1 1 0 2 50 50 0 Entire Intersection North 4:30 PM 0.79 5 45 4 54 9 83 7 East 0.54 2 2 11 15 13 13 73 South 0,91 11 90 5 106 10 85 5 West 0.50 1 1 0 2 50 50 0 CR-7 KN W—j—E S ': • 9.2:. .'.`. H.::::":::-;;K:K:g3gititif.:K:K::::::::÷:.:.x.x.x.x.:.:÷:cc. r :33 :z:: ADAMS RD (CR-32) 15 2 ...,..... 0 L 11 i ...::::::.:iiE-::-:i 1 2 ADAMS RD (CR-32) 16 'a*ff-E.cggffg, 1 J 106 = - 5 I 90 it • f ak CR-7 ca- 4i5f 4th f LA) f� 51�f wool Q-o (ca -3z) -___f_ 410? • e,, • • Counter Measures ite Code : 14 PAGE: 1 / STREET: CR-7 FILE: CR-7EONT I. STREET: HUNTERS COVE RD CIIIIIIFT: MEAD/VELD Movements by: Vehicles DATE: 1/16/07 i From North From East From South Frog Nest Vehicle ?gin RT THRO LT RT THRU LT RT TRH LT RT THRU LT Total 6 0 0 27 0 2 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 33 S5 0 33 0 0 0 9 0 9 0 0 0 0 51 1 TOTAL 0 60 0 2 0 11 0 11 0 0 0 0 84 1 0 AN 0 37 0 0 0 6 1 13 0 0 0 0 57 7:15 0 27 0 1 0 9 2 20 0 0 0 0 59 1•'0 0 46 3 0 0 4 0 13 0 0 0 0 66 1 5 0 39 0 0 0 4 1 12 0 0 0 0 56 I TOTAL 0 149 3 1 0 23 4 58 0 0 0 0 238 10AM 0 21 0 0 0 2 2 7 0 0 0 0 32 1 5 0 17 1 0 0 0 2 9 0 0 0 0 29 Break I:u0 PM 0 22 0 2 0 3 0 20 0 0 0 0 47 1:15 0 14 1 0 0 1 3 31 0 0 0 0 50 Ir D 0 16 1 1 0 1 7 26 0 0 0 0 52 1.5 0 8 1 1 0 2 2 24 0 0 0 0 38 f TOTAL 0 60 3 4 0 7 12 101 0 0 0 0 187 D 17 1 1 0 1 6 28 0 0 0 0 54 i0 13 1 0 0 3 3 33 0 0 0 0 53 :30 0 12 0 1 0 3 4 35 0 0 0 0 55 S 0 9 1 2 0 1 6 38 0 0 0 0 57 I ,JTAL 0 51 3 4 0 8 19 134 0 0 0 0 219 ,v TOTAL 0 358 10 11 0 S1 39 320 0 0 0 0 789 0 Counter Measures to Code : 14 PAGE: 1 STREET: CR-7 FILE: CR-7HUNT 3 ET: HUNTERS COVE RD I7Y: MEAD/WELD Movements by: Vehicles DATE: 1/16/07 PEAK PERIOD ANALYSIS FOR THE PERIOD: 6:30 AM - 8:30 AM DIRECTION START PEAK HR VOLUMES .... PERCENTS ... FROM PEAK HOUR FACTOR Right Thru Left Total Right Thru Left • North 7:00 AM 0.78 0 149 3 152 0 98 2 East 6:30 AM 0.73 3 0 26 29 10 0 90 South 7:00 AM 0.70 4 58 0 62 6 94 0 West 7:00 AM 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Entire Intersection North 7:00 AM 0.78 0 149 3 152 0 98 2 East 0.60 1 0 23 24 4 0 96 South 0.70 4 58 0 62 6 94 0 West 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CR-7I-:: .::: N S • .59 0 149 3 •::::�:�:. :::•:;•:�•-::::�.;s:::•;:;:c.;.:;:.; L 152 _____I 1 giagE:0&k.....—____ r fa 'i•`i`'" HUNTERS COVE RD 24 0 ca:;• ..,...... 0 L 23 EiZ 0 0 HUNTERS COVE RD :.S J 0 62 7 11.1111111.111 i:172 ;iS 0 58 4 • CR-7 Counter Measures t= Code : 14 PAGE: 1 TREE?: CR-7 FILE: CR-7HUNT ilillii: HUNTERS COVE RD IT ; MEAD/WELD Movements by: Vehicles DATE: 1/16/07 PEAK PERIOD ANALYSIS FOR THE PERIOD: 4:30 PM - 5:30 PM DIRECTION START PEAK HR VOLUMES .... PERCENTS ... FROM PEAK HOUR FACTOR Right Thru Left Total Right Thru Left North 4:30 PM 0.81 0 54 4 58 0 93 7 East 4:30 PM 0.83 3 0 7 10 30 0 70 South 4:30 PM 0.90 18 111 0 129 14 86 0 Nest 4:30 PM 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Entire Intersection North 4:30 PM 0.81 0 54 4 58 0 93 1 East 0.83 3 0 7 10 30 0 70 South 0.90 18 111 0 129 14 86 0 Nest 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CR-7 N W--F—E S • • 114i 0 54 4 )::::::::::::::::::::4:::.x.x.:*:*>::::::: -6 :::::: r 3 ''` ": HUNTERS COVE RD 10 0 bxR o 1 L 7 0 0 HUNTERS COVE RD Y 22s::.3: 0 i 129 F :ir61 ERm 0 111 18 • .........j......................: wee 151-°? \( 7 • )\fri r14 - 35 f • Counter Measures to Code : 5 PAGE: 1 STREET: CR-5.5 FILE: CR55SH66 STREET: SR-66 TT• : MEAD/WELD Movements by: Vehicles DATE: 1/16/07 From North From East From South From West Vehicle gin RT TURD LT RT TURD LT RT TURD LT RT TURD LT Total 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 1 0 0 0 157 0 258 t.5 0 0 0 0 130 0 1 0 0 0 179 0 310 TOTAL 0 0 0 0 230 0 2 0 0 0 336 0 568 0 AM 0 0 0 0 154 1 0 0 1 0 174 0 330 :15 0 0 0 0 149 2 0 0 0 0 183 0 334 .'9 0 0 0 0 180 0 0 0 4 0 150 0 334 5 0 0 0 0 179 0 0 0 1 3 142 0 325 TOTAL 0 0 0 0 662 3 0 0 6 3 649 0 1323 J AM 0 0 0 0 142 4 0 0 0 0 117 0 263 5 0 0 0 0 126 3 0 0 1 0 133 0 263 Break :u0 PM 0 0 0 0 166 2 0 0 1 2 138 0 309 :15 0 0 0 0 144 0 3 0 1 1 149 0 298 0 0 0 0 183 0 0 0 0 1 161 0 345 .5 0 0 0 0 171 1 0 0 0 1 159 0 332 TOTAL 0 0 0 0 664 3 3 0 2 5 607 0 1284 .1• 0 0 0 0 206 1 2 0 0 0 185 0 394 0 0 0 0 164 0 0 0 1 1 158 0 324 ;3O 0 0 0 0 166 1 1 0 0 0 158 0 326 i 0 0 0 0 151 0 0 0 1 1 152 0 305 .JTAL 0 0 0 0 687 2 3 0 2 2 653 0 1349 ' TOTAL 0 0 0 0 2511 15 8 0 11 10 2495 0 5050 • Counter Measures to Code : 5 PAGE: 1 ;RREET: CR-5.5 FILE: CR555R66 T: 5H-66 TT : MEAD/WELD Movements bp: Vehicles DATE: 1/16/07 PEAK PERIOD ANALYSIS FOR THE PERIOD: 6:30 AM - 8:30 AM DIRECTION START PEAK RR VOLUMES .... PERCENTS ... FROM PEAK HOUR FACTOR Right Thru Left Total Right Thru Left North 12:00 AM 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 East 7:00 AN 0.92 0 662 3 665 0 1100 0 South 6:45 AN 0.38 1 0 5 6 17 0 83 West 6:30 AM 0.95 0 693 0 693 0 1100 0 Entire Intersection North 7:00 AM 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 East 0.92 0 662 3 665 0 %100 0 South 0.38 0 0 6 6 0 0 1100 West 0.89 3 649 0 652 0 1100 0 CR-5 .5 N W—EE S IO 0 0 0 r SH-66 665 662 0 i L 3 649 652 SH-66 ifz 3 J 6 ..:z'tt26:::: 6 0 0 • ffffg CR-5 . 5 Counter Measures : Code : S PAGE: 1 i TIBET: CR-5.5 FILE: CRSSSH66 r T: SE—66 2Y : MEAD/WELD Movements by: Vehicles DATE: 1/16/07 PEAK PERIOD ANALYSIS FOR THE PERIOD: 4:00 PM - 6:00 PM DIRECTION START PEAK HR VOLUMES .... PERCENTS ... FROM PEAK HOUR FACTOR Right Thru Left Total Right Thru Left North 4:30 PM 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 East 4:30 PM 0.88 0 724 2 126 0 1100 0 South 4:15 PM 0.38 5 0 1 6 83 0 17 West 4:30 PM 0.90 3 663 0 666 0 1100 0 Entire Intersection North 4:30 PM 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 East 0.88 0 124 2 726 0 1100 0 South 0.38 2 0 1 3 67 0 33 West 0.90 3 663 0 666 0 1100 0 CR-5 . 5 N W-1---E S 0 0 0 rtir.7t2 5: ':. 0 0 „:::::, ...„......::::............................, .______"..."..":„.„:„.............................., :::.::::::::::::.:,:,:,:,:,:.::::::„:„...:::„.:::.::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::.:.:.:.x.x.:.: r :::::::::::::::::: is SH-66 726 724 0 L 2 663 666 SH-66 ::i: :�: 65:-. 6 3 3 1 0 2 • ik CR-5 . 5 1,4 41"Raf .5; ,s` A fw � f sN -C b 5 • est .%! .SS.PI 1 A 4 46 1 COUNTER MEASURES '9 *** Weekly Summary For Week Of January 14, 2007 *** 08:09 Pg 1 e: M0107006.PRN Sta: 011650000000 Id: 011650000000 Commld: 01 Moen: HEAD County: WELD ion: ADAMS RD (CR-32) 11/0 CR-7 Format: Dir 's: 1-1 Action: East 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Daily Wkday Wkend me Sun Non Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Avg. Avg. Avg. - - - 0 - - - 0 0 0 DO - - - 0 - - - 0 0 0 '" - - - 0 - - - 0 0 0 - - - 1 - - - 1 1 0 au - - - 0 - - - 0 0 0 )0 - - - 0 - - - 0 0 0 2 2 2 0 - 21 - - - 21 21 0 10 - - - 11 - - - 11 11 0 9 9 0 - 12 - - - 12 12 0 au - - - 10 - - - 10 10 0 10 - - - i6 - - - 16 16 0 • 4 4 0 i6 16 16 0 10 - - 21 - - - - 21 21 0 20 20 20 0 16 16 16 0 10 - - 13 - - - - 13 13 0 10 - - 6 - - - - 6 6 0 6 6 6 0 7 7 7 0 10 - - 4 - - - - 4 4 0 2 2 2 0 ils - - 95 102 - - - 197 197 0 Wkday - - 48.2 51.8 - - - Ig Day - - 48.2 51.8 - - - ak Mr None Nona None 08:00 None None None !out - - - 21 - - - ik Dr None None 16:00 13:00 None None Nona -ant - - 21 16 - - - 0 COUNTER MEASURES kkk Weekly Saumary For Week Of January 14, 2007 kka 08:09 Pg 2 is: M0107006.PE3 Sta: 011650000000 Id: 011650000000 ComeId: 01 ty/Toin; MEAD County: WELD :ion: ADAMS ED (CM-32) E/0 CM-7 Format: Dir !s: 2-1 rection; Nesti 14 1S 16 17 18 19 20 Daily Wkday Wkend (se Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Avg. Avg. Avg. . 1 - - - 0 - - - 0 0 0 :00 - - - 0 - - - 0 0 0 -1 - - - 0 - - - 0 0 0 I - - - 0 - - 0 0 0 :00 - - - 1 - - - 1 1 0 ;00 - - - 3 - - - 3 3 0 I - - - 13 - - - 13 13 0 _1 - - - 30 - - - 30 30 0 100 - - - IS - - - 15 15 0 1 - - - 6 - - - 6 6 0 - - - 16 16 16 0 0W - - - 10 - - - 10 10 0 ;00 - - - 12 - - - 12 12 0 AIL 5 5 0 20 - - - 20 20 0 100 - - 17 - - - - 17 17 0 -7 - - 20 - - - - 20 20 0 I - - 1S - - - - 15 IS 0 00 - - 15 - - - - 15 15 0 00 - - 4 - - - - 4 4 0 k - - S - - - - 5 5 0 -J - - S - - - - 5 5 0 00 - - 2 - - - - 2 2 0 2 2 2 0 • :als - - 85 131 - - - 216 216 0 ..4 Wkday - - 35.4 60.6 - - - kvg May - - 39.4 60.6 - - - ak Er None None Hone 08:00 None None None Count - - - 30 - - - :ak Or None lone 17:00 15:00 None None None -Just - - 20 20 - - - 0 COUNTER MEASURES 1R• *** Weekly Summary For Week Of January 14, 2007 *** 08:10 Pg 1 M0107001.PRA Sta: 011659000000 Id: 011659000000 CouuId: 01 y/Tovn: MEAD County: WELD :ion: ADAMS RD (CR-32) W/0 CR-7 Format: Dir ts: 1-1 'action: Bast 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Daily Wkday Wkend me Sun Non Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Avg. Avg. Avg. I - - - 0 - - - 0 0 0 00 - - - 0 - - - 0 0 0 ^1 - - - 0 - - - 0 0 0 1 - - - 1 - - - 1 1 0 uJ - - - 1 - - - 1 1 0 00 - - - 3 - - - 3 3 0 - - - 11 - - - 11 11 0 11 11 11 0 00 - - - 8 - - - 8 8 0 ^ 7 7 7 0 7 7 7 0 WI - - - 8 - - - 8 8 0 00 - - - 10 - - - 10 10 0 13 13 0 1 - - - 1 1 0 00 - - 7 - - - - 7 7 0 "° it 11 11 0 7 7 0 uu 6 6 6 0 00 2 2 2 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 00 D 0 0 0 0 0 0 ars - - 35 81 - - - 116 116 0 Wkday - - 30.2 69.8 - - - vg Day - - 30.2 69.8 - - - ak Hr None None None 07:00 None None None Count - - - 11 - - - mk dr Done None 17:00 14:00 None None None -Just - - 11 13 - - - 0 COUNTER MEASURES . t4+ Weekly Summary For Week Of January 14, 2001 *a* 08:10 Pg 2 fa. M0107007.PRA Sta: 011659000000 Id: 011659000000 Coeeld: 01 :y/Town: MEAD County: WELD ,1 ion: ADAMS RD (CR-32( 0/0 CR-7 Format: Dir s: 2-1 action: pest 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Daily ➢kday Wkend ee Sun Mon Tue Wed Tku Fri Sat Avg. Avg. Avg. - - - 0 - - - 0 0 00 - - - 0 - - - 0 0 ^" - - - 0 - - - 0 0 o - 0 0 in, - - - 1 - - - 1 1 00 - - - 3 - - - 3 3 - - - 2 - - - 2 2 - - - 4 - - - 4 4 00 - - - 6 - - - 6 6 "" - - - 5 - - - 5 5 - - - 5 - - - 5 5 vu - - - 2 - - - 2 2 00 - - - 1 - - - 7 7 S - - - 5 5 4 4 4 00 7 1 7 "" I3 - 13 13 11 - 11 11 nu - - 10 - - - - 10 10 00 - - 3 - - - - 3 3 1 - 1 1 S - 5 5 00 - - 0 - - - - 0 0 -- 1 1 ais - - 51 44 - - - 95 95 0 ., ➢kday - - 53.7 46.3 - - - ,vg Day - - 53.1 46.3 - - - ak Hr None None None 09:00 None None None Count - - - 6 - - ak Hr Hone None 11:00 13:00 None Hone lone __ant - - 13 7 - - - • COUNTER MEASURES I->•1 ttt Weekly Summary For Week Of January 14, 2007 tt* 08:08 Pg 1 l..: M01O7004.PRN Ste: 011651000000 Id: 011651000000 Could: 01 ity/Town: MEAD County: WELD tii Lion: CR-7 SIO HUNTERS COVE RD Forest: Dir Is: 1-1 Itection: North 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Daily Wkday Vkend Ise Sun Mon Tne Wed Thu Fri Sat Avg. Avg. Avg. 7 - - - 5 - - - 5 5 0 ",:00 - - - 1 - - - 2 2 0 "9 - - - 1 - - - 1 1 0 I - - 1 1 0 "J - - - 3 - - - 3 3 0 x:00 - - - 9 - - - 9 9 0 I - - - 24 - - - 24 24 0 I - - - 60 - - - 60 60 0 :00 - - - 49 - - - 49 49 0 "1 - 30 - - - 30 30 0 : I - - - 48 - - - 48 48 0 :Liu - - - 57 - - - 57 57 0 :00 - - - 45 - - - 45 45 0 - - 64 64 64 0 780 78 78 0 :0 101 101 101 0 `"i - - 113 - - - - 113 113 0 I - - 153 - - - - 153 153 0 :uu - - 101 - - - - 101 101 0 :00 - - 65 - - - - 65 65 0 I - - 64 - - - - 64 64 0 : ! - - 40 - - - - 40 40 0 :00 - - 16 - - - - 16 16 0 :"" - - 14 - - - - 14 14 0 tens - - 667 476 - - - 1143 1143 0 I ; Wkday - - 58.4 41.6 - - - 4vg Day - - 58.4 41.6 - - - ak Hr None Bone None 08:00 None None lone count - - - 60 - - - ak Or None None 18:00 15:00 None None lone .nut - - 153 78 - - - 41 COUNTER MEASURES -t0 t*t Weekly Summary For Week Of January 14, 2007 *t* 08:08 Pg 2 ..: M0107004.PRN Sta: 011651000000 Id: 011651000000 CommId: 01 ty/Torn: HEAD County: WELD :ion: CR-7 S/0 HUNTERS COVE RD Format: Dir . 's: 2-1 tection: South 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Daily Wkday Wkend iae Sun Non Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Avg. Avg. Avg. I - - - 3 - - - 3 3 :00 - - - 2 - - - 2 2 an — - - 2 - - - 2 2 ' - - - 4 - - - 4 4 vu - - - 9 - - - 9 9 00 - - - 46 - - - 46 46 - - - 131 - - - 131 131 - - - 196 - - - 196 196 D0 - - - Iii - - - 111 111 ail 77 77 77 66 - 66 66 vu - - - 61 - - - 61 61 00 - - - 61 - - - 61 61 46 46 46 71 71 71 00• - - 99 - - - - 99 99 "" - - 126 - - - - 126 126 - - 132 - - - - 132 132 tie - - 118 - - - - 118 118 00 - - 66 - - - - 66 66 48 48 48 15 25 25 00 - - 14 - - - - 14 14 °° l0 10 10 ace - - 638 886 - - - 1524 1524 0 - Wkday - - 41.9 58.1 - - - vg Day - - 41.9 58.1 - - - tk Hr None None None 08:00 None None None :ount - - - 196 - - - ak Kr None None 18:00 15:00 None None None ant - - 132 71 - - - 0 COUNTER MEASURES F. kit Weekly Salary For Week Of January 14, 2007 a== 08:09 Pg 2 II: 80107005:PRI Sta: 011652000000 Id: 011652000000 Conic!: 01 :JIToRn: MEAD County: WELD is ion: CR-7 8/0 ADAMS RD (CR-32) lariat: Dir r,s: 2-1 Ration: North 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Daily Wkday Wkend We Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Avg. . Avg. Avg. 5 5 0 OD - - - 2 - - - 2 2 0 • 2 1 1 0 - - - 1 - - - 1 1 0 Da - - - 2 - - - 2 2 0 00 - - - 7 - - - 7 1 0 I - - - 24 - - - 24 24 0 L. - - - 66 - - - 66 66 0 00 - - - 58 - - - 58 58 0 `- - - - 27 - - - 27 21 0 - - - 40 - - - 40 40 0 OD - - - 51 - - - 51 51 0 00 - - 42 - - - 42 42 0 iS - - - 56 - - till, - - - 53 - - - 53 53 0 00 - - 80 - - - - 80 80 0 - - 88 - - - - 88 88 0 G _ - - 126 - - - - 126 126 0 00 - - 69 - - - - 69 69 0 D0 - - 50 - - - - 50 50 0 I - - 47 - - - - 47 47 0 t' - - 29 - - - 29 29 0 00 - - 14 - - - - 14 14 0 r - - 8 - - - - 8 8 0 als - - 511 435 - - - 946 946 0 t, Wkday - - 54.0 46.0 - - - vg DIY - - 54.0 46.0 - - - I Lk Hr None None None 08:00 None None None Count - I it Hr None None 18:00 14:00 None None None cant - - 126 56 - - - 0 COUNTER MEASURES . aaa Weekly Summary For Week Of January 14, 2007 *** 08:09 Pg 1 1a': M0107O05.PRN Sta: 011652000000 Id: 011652000000 ConnId: 01 ty/Tovn: MEAD County: WELD [ ':ion: CR-7 1/0 ADAMS RD (CR-32) Format: Dir !s: 1-1 rection: South 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Daily Wkday Wkend [me Sun Mon Tun Wed Thu Fri Sat Avg. Avg. Avg. 1' - - - 0 - - - 0 0 0 00 - - - 1 - - - 1 1 0 si - - - 1 - - - 4 4 0 1 - - - 5 - - - 5 5 0 ud - - - 4 - - - 4 4 0 :00 - - - 31 - - - 31 31 0 - - - 81 - - - 81 81 vv 1 - - - 133 - - - 133 133 0 00 - - - 95 - - - 95 95 0 '"1 - - - 61 - - - 62 62 0 i0 50 50 0 on - - - 50 - - - 50 SD 0 00 - - - S8 - - sa 58 0 39 39 39 0 53 53 53 0 001. - - 76 - - - - 76 76 0 " 62 52 52 0 - 50 50 SO 0 uu 40 40 40 0 00 - - 18 - - - - 28 28 0 11 17 17 0 11 17 17 0 00 - - 8 - - - - 8 8 0 5 5 5 0 als - - 303 654 - - - 967 967 0 Wkday - - 31.3 68.7 - - - vg Day - - 31.3 68.7 - - - ak Kr None "none lone 08:00 lone None None Count - - - 133 - - - ak Er None lone 16:00 13:00 lone None None _.,unt - - 76 58 - - - 0 Counter Measures *** Weekly Summary for week of November 13, 2005 *** Page 3 * ************************************************************************* File : M1105002.PRN ittion : 000000111517 Lane(s) : 1 dentification : 000000111517 Direction : Northbound -ty/Town County WELD ration : CR-5 S-/0 CR-32 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Wkday Daily ' ime Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Avg. Avg. 1 :00 2 2 1 00 0 0 0 :00 1 1 1 4:00 1 1 1 5 :00 2 2 1 ' 00 7 7 5 . : 00 19 19 14 B: 00 32 32 23 00 32 32 23 00 14 14 10 1:00 13 13 9 ? .00 33 33 24 00 22 22 16 .00 27 27 19 5 :00 39 39 28 46 46 33 53 53 38 3: 50 50 36 -00 45 45 32 00 35 35 25 1:00 32 32 23 ? :00 20 20 14 00 7 7 5 00 1 1 1 als 533 533 381 **************************************************************************** Avg Wkday 100.0 ,vg Day 140.0 4 Peak Hr 12 :00 Count 33 Peak Hr 17 :00 Count 53 0 Counter Measures *** Weekly Summary for week of November 13, 2005 *** Page 4 * ************************************************************************* ile : M1105002 .PRN ition : 000000111517 Lane(s) : 2 dentification : 000000111517 Direction : Southbound qty/Town County : WELD ration : CR-5 S/0 CR-32 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Wkday Daily ime Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Avg. Avg 1 :00 1 1 1 ' : 00 0 0 0 :00 3 3 2 a :00 1 1 1 3 : 00 7 7 5 :00 16 16 11 . :00 40 40 29 3: 00 61 61 44 .00 48 48 34 00 26 26 19 L: 00 19 19 14 ' :00 28 28 20 00 34 34 24 .. 00 27 27 19 5 :00 30 30 21 36 26 36 36 26 436 46 46 33 1 . 00 21 21 15 00 13 13 9 .: 00 8 8 6 ! :00 10 10 7 00 4 4 3 00 1 1 1 `als 516 516 369 **************************************************************************** Avg Wkday 100. 0 .vg Day 140.0 I Peak Hr 08 :00 Count 61 I Peak Hr 18 :00 I Count 46 **************************************************************************** • count MOM 12-12-2004 ttl hotly Unify Tor het Of Many I, 2004 *It 01:23 t9 2 11$: 10204001.111 Its: 020957000000 Id: 020957000000 Could: Al @1ty/ton: RID Couty: RID .acatiot: t1-66 1/0 CI-7 Taut: Dlr melt: 3.1 Ureatlos: East 1 9 10 11 12 13 14 Dilly May Read Tina Sn lot Ti. hi 7h hl Set h9. W. leo. 11:00 - - 29 - - - - 29 29 12:00 - - 19 - - - - 19 1! 13:00 - - 10 - - - - 10 10 14:00 - - 11 - - - - 11 17 15:00 - - 60 - - - - 61 61 A:00 - - 217 - - - - 217 287 17:00 - - SIT - - - - 517 517 11:00 - - 627 - - - - 627 627 )9:00 - - 501 - - - - 501 501 10:00 - - 376 - - - - 376 376 367 367 367 - 419 419 419 - - - - - -414 414 414 14:00 - - 439 - - - - 439 139 15:00 - - 472 - - - - 472 472 16:00 - - 512 - • - - 512 512 17:00 - - 641 - - - - 611 647 11:00 - - 613 - - - - 603 613 19:00 - - 465 - - - - 465 465 20:00 - - 275 - - - - 275 275 21:00 - - 207 - - - - 207 207 12:00 - - 177 - - - - 171 177 13:00 - - 103 - - - - 103 103 24:00 - - 53 - - - - 53 53 totals - - 7754 - - - - 7754 1754 0 I Alf Dtday - - 100.0 - - - - 1 leg Day - - 100.0 - - - - II Tat It loll lots 01:00 loss loss loos loss 11 Cout - - 627 - - - - tI halt loos loll 11:00 loss loll lose lose NI Cout - - 613 - - - • 0 • Count 100113 I2-12-2004 n' hotly sugary for Volt Of hbrury I, 2004 to 09:23 t9 1 ME 10204001.t11 Ha: 020957000000 Id: 020957000000 Could: 01 3y/ton: uu Couty: 9110 .aeatlos: 11-66 I/O CI-7 Nut: Olr :uo/s: 1-1 )lruetiot: lilt 1 9 10 11 12 13 14 Dilly 0tdq RS flu su lot he lad ?It Fri lit log. lag. Ivy. 11:00 - - 36 - - - - 36 36 12:00 - - 27 - - - - 27 27 13:00 - - 14 - - - - 14 14 34:00 - - 24 - - - - 24 24 05:00 - - 61 - - - - 69 69 06:00 - - 124 - - - - 1I4 124 17:00 - - 491 - - - - 491 491 11:00 - - 719 - - - - 719 719 09:00 - - 571 - - - - 571 571 10:00 - - 424 - - - - 424 424 1 • 0 - - 390 - - - - 390 390 316 316 316 425 425 • 425 14:00 - - 411 - - - - 411 411 15:00 - - 426 - - - - 426 426 16:00 - - 557 - - - - 557 557 17:00 - - 571 - - - - 571 571 11:00 - - 02 - - - - 662 662 19:00 - - 462 - - - - 462 462 20:00 - - 229 - - - - 221 229 21:00 - - 117 - - - - 117 117 22:00 - - 164 - - - - 164 164 23:00 - - 112 - - - - 112 112 24:00 - - 66 - - - - 66 66 totals - - 7554 - - - - 7554 7554 0 6 N0 May - - 100.0 - - - - I h9 Day - - 100.0 - - - - u tut It Iola has 01:00 Ion Ion Ina you U Cout - - 719 - - - - tI tat Ir loss Ion 11:00 Ion loss Iola Ion HI Cont - - 662 - - - - • Capacity B Analysis HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2007 AM Existing 4: SH 66 & CR 7 2/20/2007 0 3 -' - ' C •— 4\ t ti j d 1.9.- 0 :c:;: .. �, ., it. ili,3-t a,:tf4v .81A 1,.. ? ,('.br-e,rA e S ....-? :. frige Pirl.:'t5-#,..B ' "F." ; Lane Configurations ' 1. '1 '4 4) 4. tddeaI FIo vp tpp :: £ * 1900 11900 r 1900„ 1900 9011 0900 --.1900 :19000199- i190a.. 190 1900 Total Lost time(s) 4.0 -4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lend Uti Factc "� _ ;100 100 . .. 00 1011' 1x09 ., E 4 1 .."fpm m Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.96 0.88 FltPao -,. =095 1PU:_ .1 .�0:95 1;00 0;98- -, _, . , _..F .T. _F1t�g111 ..'' Satd. Flow(prot) 1770 1863 1770 1859 1758 1631 r,.s a r t, �,�reri �`x� � �;�:�,.A 0�. s _i0gFAtiaK aR9�; ::'?: r: ,.F:g fti .e°`s Satd. Flow(perm) 613 1863 473 1859 1664 1606 ,e p T: ..4 :I600 " 0 M� .'t x€99. 1=.7u.r 4 .tfe-P . . .S16 ' 2 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 '--0.92 0.92 0.92 0PiaaggaraMMAISSARTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 r 0 0 0 0 ,_ 0 3 0 0 136 0 Core irM&Fl ( t -'.3 652 = 0.y. ' 4 X550 r 0 ` 0. t•140 n.0=?. = 0 ;:"r r Turn Type pm+pt pm+pt Perm Perm Pate'ct� ha ` t 8+. 2 ' .O .; ' Permitted Phases 4 8 2 6 Acct a ren G(s) f 52:'0 45 0 _152 45:0, ri.-.";19 0 . 19 0 Effective Green, g (s) 52.0 45.0 52.0 45.0 19.0 19.0 glirgr‘Vtip,}.Kfrui"7.!1-57,4a, 054"�''.: , '` eas, 054=,- 0:23 {`w s z.z" 3 Clearance Time(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane a as p?Ph) s 482 1010 , _., 06' i 0Q8 . . 4 381 ` .^C .= ,;;_a68, , _, v/s Ratio Prot c0701 c0 35 0.00 0.30• gal h6e ": _,006 , ,_. `: - ; .r:.. 0 01 c0 94 v/c Ratio 611-; 0.65 0.01 0.55 0.03 0.17 Unifkt i% e a i t 1: 7 0 134 ik 7 ;1223 r24.8. fi ?25-x`„ Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Increme statDetay,;i2 _# .0 5s 3 2 500 2 '�`_ 0=1 1 0 Delay(s) 7.5 16.6 7.7 14.5 24.9 26.6 LereFofel0e ti =:A. ? B' . G .. Approach Delay(s) 15.9 14.4 24.9 26.6 3,�3.c. afi-x`4a•..i..')I. :-6'})..t1. a agt:0 .5f4 nat'-'r"*:r S.1 '?:.i - s a?:` ' iit-. "fiia r HCMagec tz,, trrdt Delay , 15.9 - a ACM Level•of Service B' ` r, ` ",_t "' HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.46 ActuatedCycleLength(s) . +_ ,, 83,0 .,"„ Sum of lost time(s) 12.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 56.7% ICU Level of Service B Anatysis ertoE rl 15 a c Critical Lane Group • Alam 2007 AM Existing Mead Place (LSC#070010) Page 1 LSC, Inc. HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2007 AM Existing 6: SH 66 & CR 5 2/20/2007 W c 4- t 4\ t t ti 1 J _ Lane Configurations vi f+ hi 4 4 SI t anfrojya } " it rwu. '*''l-,efee'p r ::§t0 k" .�'ZQ�fi.*e�-:-.s: Grade 0% o% 0% 0% Vaitrrte eh/h) t4g ,r 6666;: o. 2 644.Y t . �fi.3 2 2' ;:t1-1;::04.74,7:97p$:$ Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Ho 7rl},` I atr• vp.b).`. ... 35,. 6 . 0 . : 2 ; ;t4; 0 Y ., 3 ';;2.....k z.' 2 ' 4.. .: 4, Pedestrians r Walking Speed (ft/s) Right turn flare (veh) Milan.t latiram^:,.S4 E .`. .V.; .. .'. sr .g t�o[le, 706ii C- Median storage veh) ""' Upit 3.bnaljfE pX, platoon unblocked vG• .1411 1.441,0e p `T$1 x 6 58 .. „ =1518 14'42 ,658 14 46 '=;1442' ..1'i vC1, stage 1 conf vol vc2 r.115 vor : , vCu, unblocked vol 711 658 1518 1442 658 1446 1442 711 tGainO a(s)..,.`.. 4 - ° . . 4.x `= .. T 1 ':::-',..0--,..';'5',.62:: :::17.7;;113:. .:;°6 . . 6 2 tC, 2 stage (s) tF s : r 22. a T . 4 0 X3'3 , 351 " `6N p0 queue free% 96 100 96 98 100 98 97 83 • cM caps q(vettl3 a ' a 9 ; 93Q= ,., 76 ,127 44d:= 104 ' i2* ,x_433 BriEcim ia''at. • ,: a ..spins,' €Yj 3:. x`5 -a. # xgr3. :,r ie "'el ; "_ + .L K h .a'��w .G ttlrs..X t .'� L'1 4� �te..`.- efume ,` at r==r�.�, tms g i tt _ * s0.. _ e- t mil. Volume Left 35 0 2 0 3 2 Valama.R,rg"(i( SJ F- : Q_ 0A 4 0 2' a 4= :,'. cSH 889 1700 930 1700 118 356 Votumeyto:gapaoity_ rz.,. Efg4. (t-39_ :.000 ,042< 0ti6 0?3 -_ Queue Length 95th (ft) 3 0 0 0 5 21 Cont4o>;rte X is . ?: <21 Qtr , 8 9 ',0 Q @7;T( 18-Q -≥ Lane LOS A A E C AppfosckOra:y(s) , ,0 5_.. 60. '. 37;.7: mg .'.' 7,'' Approach LOS E C Average Delay 1.4 tntersectioncapacityUtilization:,!cLc '- :--4$4.4"::::::- `, ICULevetofService ' A` :- Analysis Period (min) 15 •Alam 2007 AM Existing Mead Place (LSC#070010) Page 2 LSC, Inc. HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2007 AM Existing 8: SH 66 & CR 5.5 2/20/2007 • Matt. -• f 4- 4\ r � :tICT.a'1n Lane Configurations '1 T V Grade 0% 0% 0% Vl lum [Yeh/h) 649 0, Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 t`t rC fa„Strate t~vph) Pedestrians Walking Speed (ft/s) P`ra Cen agteklike ,:r" R YV x 'x Right turn flare(veh) Me�ia'�[y"�1e •y ,0. a.^- i _ S ks l'5 f F 55` � i ^.+..S '.� 3. Ym� Median storage veh) Upstreattstgnal(fty', " : s it ' r4 e , . ' pX, platoon unblocked vC tJnflktujgvgtdT' 705, 1432 , 7tT5 <,. vC1, stage 1 conf vol vQ2 tag 2 rgrif Vof vCu, unblocked vol 705 1432 705 tQ stngf s)., 4 _ tC,��« j2` stage(s) b�. y Sb,1Y- -.. p0• 411-00.010:0.114!):::;".;', queue free % 100 96 100 cM._caiaca (v.�t 5L; ;- Vdlui o atl l{ t:f 06 t WP Or$� m: Y�'t �tt'y,WS ek,-:Rirc ra7.. P Volume Left 0 3 0 7 cSII 1700 893 1700 147 Votuma to ap 9141Thi 000 aa2 . _ . Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 0 0 3 qdk ti jQelay f'sy`"':: U>0 9=0 :' 0 0 `3_EL_6.F, 4 . . "• Lane LOS A D Approach fJelay(sy; 0.0 00,t 30$ Approach LOS D ≥saa [ Si'a `l Average Delay 0.2 tntersectiort`Capacity Utilization 4a 8%' ICU Level otSerNtoe A Analysis Period (min) 15 • Alam 2007 AM Existing Mead Place (LSC#070010) Page 3 LSC, Inc. HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2007 AM Existing 10: WCR 32 & CR 7 2/2O/2OO7 III _ is > c '_' k- 4r g 1 t \* l i jpr{ d Lane Configurations 44 4+ S`ign£Control a--Free•'- „- ,, ,,Free .Sto z: - 5,- 4, "*, z,-w�"; Grade ° f $top" ; 0% O% O% O% Volum-e(veh/(r). . ._ 5 ,x '> . ,5.. •1' '0 9' . 2 X46 s 9 'i.. {3 'aS ;_ Peak Hour 7 ^ Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92' 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 O 92 0.92 HOIirlyFflo Ar fate, ;yph) ,r„ - ' s ,J n-m- _,18 'Y � 1O ''`1' 2 "5t .... 0 �'� ° t'1-.-*.;.^,C:_... a�.li'.-4 ,__ x s Pedestrians p ' �_.e�;s,^ LS'ew ith(+t . •-. , . - .,.�::-.. . , ix-."``� n.4 �, s "' ar'r''; Walking Speed (ft/s) .. _: Right turn flare (veh) r edlar:t; ew.�.,..axCt .t o- ia_- �, ..,a k -''.:�.. s f�f©tle: '�' .: ik, p -..4. ...- i, .. S s ..�.�-.�rlss�S,_ o-�,z. �� Median storage veh) �" ' tl streams n X platoon unblocked p� a .�. , � _ . . , 3 1/2 i� f 7 -: a w a ,y � vC, con cti 3 atu n (0 :, 125 6 8:' 93 x 614 ry . vC1, stage 1 conf vol k;5 vC21 s(age2 conf vol _ vCu, unblocked vol 1O 9 125 64 6 93 61 5 tC, single(a)I. ,,::n. 4i :41 .=-:r7. , .6: T 6.2.' 71. fi.5., 0 2 tC, 2 stage(s) � �- -� �•3 tEEtsj :ic _�, .,..= 2.2 2 22 . 35., .40k 3.3 _ 35 4j '. 3-3 p0 queue free% 1OO 99 1OO 94 99 1OO 85 1OO • cM capacit r(veh/h 16.10 .. ,t. . _ 1611" t ,.'fg N 738 a, ,}+ . 02 1 '6 T1 Ke Volume Fotalt-- .. �14 28 62,b , 1.33 �- i -- 'r 3 u u , t-',�aa; Volume Left 5 18 2 3 r` ' `" i"" Volume,Right .6 , R6 10 1O' 3, 's: •- : cSH 161O 1611 844 822 " Volume:to Capacity. 0_.00 0701 360,07 „ ©:16 Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 1 6 14 " Control'Dela`y(s):.> . 2 8 _4 8 -'0 6 101 ,.. .. , Lane LOS A A A B _ ApproachDelay(s) 28; ...4.8 ,, 96° ;10:2 ; `_" , Approach LOS A B tn�". fnmaf a -L-----;;, - 7' Average Delay 9.O Intersection Capacity Utilization 17.5% :' ICU Level of Service e , „� (min) 15 ` Analysis Period (m • Alam 2OO7 AM Existing Mead Place(LSC#O7OO1O) Page 4 LSC, Inc. HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2007 AM Existing 12: Hunters Cove Rd & CR 7 2/20/2007 Lane Configurations ►r 1 Sign Control Stop Rree , _ : Ere rt N..=z'r Grade 0% 0% 0% 19 4 2 0.92 3 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 HourlyflowrateEvph) 5 t :!:'•.,6,3„:•..,-‘•::::--.4• "3 16-7 ' _; ~ ,. Pedestrians . _., LarieWidttt(ft) .,E Walking Speed (ft/s) " Percent Blockage , >r T Right turn flare(veh) IWEsdianytyti .. .a - None 5 - - ., i s- r a x , ': Median storage veh) Upstreatnslgnal fft ! x . a r xy s 73 x „ '{ pX, platoon unblocked vC,;confllchng vptUrne 234 65 y, .67 ' ki x _ *:, vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 confvol ' mss;: vCu, unblocked vol 234 65 67 tc1smgte-(s) __ 64 62 ... 4:y} -4 ms`s tC, 2 stage(s) tR(s)' " 3 5 :'33 2z"2 " p0 queue free% 97 100 100 cM capacaty(veh/ti)• 753, g _` -4534 ii Y J 1 W I�� M1 i �#' ` 1 ,1 .'il„ 'i Y..s..� A`t. . ._ n Y�)}�yd � � 1'u...�u_ �.. ...?s Yw.'.r^Sm- 4"2n.siae ?4tiX tit t. c otuma Total '26 *',"6 is ">: , 7, ,.. :w ert: f. "} ";' ;} Volume Left 25 0 3 VolumeRight . :4 4..:;; 0 ` r FF.. cSH 761 1700 1534 Volume'tucapacity 0:03 004 0.00 ,` Queue Length 95th (ft) 3 0 0 Control belay(s) ..•:::•:,;;;:;.,',a2.91,-,-.-..--..0,-Q,..-:,„ 0,2` Lane LOS A A Approach Delay(s) ss : o:o ; 'a.2 Approach LOS A In a 6Witgat tna izsgA - ctia, ' -:ate p. Average Delay 1.1 Interseetio'rtCapacity Utilization 20.2% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 • Alam 2007 AM Existing Mead Place(LSC#070010) Page 5 LSC, Inc. HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2007 AM Existing 14: WCR 32 & Hunters Cove Rd 2/20/2007 } 1 W � B Lane Configurations 4) S[tt[tacitye , A--: Free:- re `�' ,Slop �5tp .�y '�_: Grade 0%. 0% 0% 0% Volnrr)ervefi/h).r _ ''. -1- 1$ t 4 . ,4:6_ .<.0.; 2 ':2 3' d l Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 tld1r}yl&wrate,(vph) . :..1 14, 1 4 f7‘ ... Q 2 ' 2 3- . ..4 ;>a '3 , . k-:3 Pedestrians La6.e ldtt?(tt)4 , w _ Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent iocka 9e{ ° -' ,' , . ,: t,_ .!, Right turn flare(veh) "? `'' ged`la i "N None ,: 1Yone _- Median storage veh) " pX, platoon unblocked vG,§epnfjwt vo1i`iko 4-17 15 :.50 _-:43 153. 47 ,_: 43. 1='7 vC1, stage 1 conf vol KL stage x4of vo} ` s-; vCu unblocked vol 17 15 50 43 15 47 43 17 tC,single(s') 4,1 41` 7.1 :6:5 62,=, 71 '+'=.$5 f 2 tC, 2 stage(s) tr-.44 € ' r. . -2-- 2z ],-.'i--.3.1,-6:,' .:4.0 3A`_ 35,°)4,a- •` 3'3 p0 queue free% 100 100 100 100 100 100 99 100 • 6M -eapacatti(vehlto 1600 y 1603 ,938 846 106& 946 ,. 644, 4.t6 Vt thetTotatit L 't6 22; - -Ii:"'"?-54-157;,';':-rti"E A , r c ,..,. , '," �TF Volume Left 1 4 2 4 Voiu erg tt t` U:.` 3 '!,:::a1;,1 • x cSH 1600 1603 957 913 VolumetoCapacdy ; . ; 0:00 000 -__'.--0.01 oaT2• -::::!;:,- „t:,..f.:;-:-:;;: Length 95th (ft) 0 0 1 1 Corrtra(D lay(S 0.5 ' 1.57:: 8.8 ',8-.8-.: Lane LOS A A A A Ap hach:De(ay(s)'. 0.5 1.5: . '6.8 = "9:0 r- ' Approach LOS A A ttt,t�. claw, .,rattititiria±,;,, 4 r 'nt". gr `. rel: *` ',v.�:?, • t egt.C; s' Average Delay 4.0 Interseetion Capacity Utilization 13.3% ICU Level of Service . A, Analysis Period (min) 15 •Alam 2007 AM Existing Mead Place(LSC#070010) Page 6 LSC, Inc. HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2007 PM Existing 4: SH 66 & CR 7 2/20/2007 mom. Lane Configurations IT) ►t T., 4, 4, Ideal.'FlQw(vphpl) 19110 49017 ':1900 :1900 1900. 1900 :1900 1900„1 1900 1900;g19ti0 1000 Total Lost time(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Ut Factor '_' tOP t9t '1.00, 1'00 1.1.00 f ' -.® Frt 1.60 100 1.00 1 00 0.94 0 88 Fitf?rotepted,. . '<., P95`.`11110 :-..":45:95':4:0(1.*:,,,. .A s `[ 091# ' '[00 ,. ..=:=== '! Satd. Flow(plot) 1770 1862 1770 1859 1722 1639 Fit,Permtted . 1: ' . 02Q,` 00,£:' x034S;i 100. 195 ......., -.,....... . ,.., „.9.,9_,..,-..,.. ..::- Satd. Flow(perm) 378 1862 631 1859 1659 1625 Yi.:10Fn ph ' .. . _ 171 ', 7,;2 4,E a c671a : c14,t `. .�3. _F s 2 h 4 5 `. 4• - 52 ti ;m Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 u.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Af o(h. t, l-s W7 3. r' 2 wi4 729: 1 { 4;` 5-: =+ 4 t.c57 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 3 0 0 45 0 t0(64::: r oti FloY tvph),10177 .55a i . 0••.;-.. . 4 .-739;. KK?0, .i, ..0.n . s<6 4 .0 ',' 0.. : 2.1 . 0 Turn Type pm+pt pm+pt Perm Perm Proecfof Phases, " .. '. 4 3 Permitted Phases 4 8 2 6 Act..krat G en,G1,$) v56 f ,„49..30.,;' 520 47.0'4 170 17.0 Effective Green,g (s) 56.0 49.0 52.0 47.0 17.0 17.0 A efe 9/C-,Iat ' k :0 67 X59;." 0.63 0 5 ; 0.20 „" - 0 20 . .:. Clearance Time(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lan Grptaecyph), �37t 1099. 464 ,1053 c „,,,,-,:.....,,c, ..,,,..,.. '333 • v/s Ratio Prot c0 03 0.32 0.00 c0.40 • v .R. i#. e , 12. '.. .- 6.00 l)i� 0.00 c09 . . . ' I v/c Ratio 0.34 0.54 0.01 0.7d 0 02 0.06 Un efa 1x..,. t r '6 1 2 :, ;6'5 13 0 4 26:x' ,,,. .:2',--.•2&..6.. ."'"',--:=2 ... Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 IncremeiztafDela , 02 , .2.5` 9; ' 00 .3.9; :-.4:04.1.,".t...7 Or# Delay(s)' 11.1 12.2 6.5 16.9 26.4. 26.9 LeveroLSenice & B ,::,4:,: .--:\:-.:p..,` r (C Approach Delay(s) 12.0 16.8 26.4 26.9 A.00 c�Q3 '--.„_:-.7---':-. ...;:t',:'--- •„g - __-C = C I . . �. HCM Mtetagd Conirol Delay 15 0 HCM Level of Service HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.54 Acfuated=Cyde Length(s),. : '83.0 Sum of`lost time(s) 16.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 56.3% ICU Level of Service B AnalysisPeriod,(mir) '= , 15 c Critical Lane Group •Alam 2007 PM Existing Mead Place(LSC#070010) Page 1 LSC, Inc. HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2007 PM Existing 6: SH 66 & CR 5 2/20/2007 0 f . - CI— k- , tPtilr Lane Configurations ►1 ti 1 ti 4) 4, Siiyrtc101:trof. . F s Free; '` ` Free . vsx ₹ . , .Stopw _ _ :fSto xx " Grade 0% 0% 0% . 0% VolumN vettlhi X52' 680 4 ' :' 752 5 . , 6 4 . 1a. 1' ..'p ;0 ,, ;`26 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 '0.92 0.92 6.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly(f(oa rate',(vphl . . .57 .,.739 ...,4.. ' t5. .-&1 . ,: .x4 *3 ... -:f ,. ,...0 s 28 Pedestrians Lane`Wiidth'S. -<s: -:s }.... f*; , ; - '"F. a.::... Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent 8l'ockC ija. :- . -t. ' ..N- .` , .'`.;;1 - '4ill 'w. . t ` ="s,7:: Right turn flare (veh) " ' _ ian- a �� ) ..1,:. ... _.�_: . __ . ..�_ � ._ i.. ��. �.. �Nene'��,��.� _fir 4,�.t�on ef��'�'� ll Median storage veh) Upstream signal,(ft� -T-. s x j pX, platoon unblocked ` `" vC, confltetirig'vofume S'=-82d " ;,7.43 , r;' ;.`1711 X1689 ,'-741° 1,666 ,. 688 821 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2,.stage 2 cenfvol vCu, unblocked vol 824 743 1711 1689 741 1686 1688 821 tC1singlefsf".. . ` .. 2. 44'1. : .'r . 4. . 7`1 s&6 z.f t ;x C_5. 62 tC, 2 stage (s) 2--2 Q 3 a' 3 5 tF(s)��' �u�. t :: .,,. 2.E 35 ,�;4 ">t1Q 33 • p0 queue free % 93 99 93 96 100 90 100 92 • cM caP ity vreh/h) 806 x :x884 62, ,s 6 x;414 68 ` 88 375 nsnn.'. a t�r aat �$ va 4 1 k s - .a. VD,tei, of l z ' K ..G57 ' 8' 5,= 4" 3 5, Et-35" - ~ �. Pgtwft t .., Volume Left 57 0 5 0 4 7 Volume`Right 0n 4,:: €o 7 F 7i 28 M cSH 806 1700 864 1700 79 203 Volume to Capacity = 0..0? ©'44 x0.01. 0-48 L Oil 0,17 Queue Length 95th (ft) 6 0 0 0 9 15 ControlDelay(slm,': :98 00"x ' 9.2 ,_.`;0.0"::::1:$4.i2;=": §4:11:" Lane LOS A A F D Approac5 4-.1*- 0 Q.:1 ._ a 1 ":": 56:2. 126 4,, ' . =:_. . . . Approach LOS F D lritQrsec t [ al - 2� Average Delay 1.2 Intersection Capacity Utilization `._ 53.2% '.'' "ICl1:Level of Service ' " *• Analysis Period (min) 15 • Alam 2007 PM Existing Mead Place (LSC#070010) Page 2 LSC, Inc. HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2007 PM Existing 8: SH 66 & CR 5.5 2/20/2007 • ®r_} ' * x 70.,,:a.;...:E Lane Configurations r+ t y T' SgrtControl' Free . 'Free , lap ,` •.; Grade 0% 0% 0% Volume(vefi/h) 663 3'' 2 724 4 ' 2 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 u.92 Hoa flovi.ate(vph) 724 3z_ 2 ' ':787 Inn t 2 • Pedestrians Lane Width ffl „-' Walking Speed(ft/s) Percent't lockage.'- - Right turn flare (veh) �:�� a. Median storage veh) "`' x'` � - Upstream signal jft pX, platoon unblocked vC co»flicting io!ume. . ` 724. 151.4 x722,., vCt, stage 1 conf vol _ - vC2,stage 2 calif v it vCu, unblocked vol 724 1514 722 tC,662 stage (s) 2 5 tF'(s)^'++ id .3... } 2:r 5. n..3 • p0 queue free% 100 99 99 cM capn'city cveh/h)=. , 879, ;. f 32:• X427' •Voiu of kxu .a `724 3,. 2 r-"787 it, 3 it , E• e j l- k ti S .A Volume Left 0 2 0 1 Volunte'ftight 3'. 0 0 t2 cSH 1700 879 1700 244 Volume to Capacity:; 9.4a 0.00. . . 0.46 0.01`_ Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 0 0 1 Control Delay s) 0.0 ,. 9. � ':010.i =20 0 Lane LOS A C <. ApproacchaDeiay(s ;0.0 0.0 20.0 Approach LOS C Average Delay 0.1 Intersection`Capacity Utilizati n 48.1% ICU Level of Service: .>A Analysis Period (min) 15 • Alam 2007 PM Existing Mead Place (LSC#070010) Page 3 LSC, Inc. HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2007 PM Existing 10: WCR 32 & CR 7 2/20/2007 IIIisc 4 1 t t ' 1 :e€ : Lane Configurations 4) 4) 4, 4, Sig Control, FreeY° Free ,"Stop -.gep ,s, Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% VoItme`(veh/ft} 0 l e. .1 . t 11. aa2 ",: ' ..5I s=9tk f A .4. X45. .:'.'5 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourtyff0*rafcs,::(KPh). `;"-0 .. . j1.: : ' '( ~S ' '. 2- !. . .5.t 9t.5 �. :/ 4 3 w4 'f;-5 Pedestrians Ljje dtt(ft}._;: ° e t; -t " =. � -: Walking Speed (f/s) PercenfFB(ockige c . Right turn flare (veh) Herb re r Inner ` a:1 Nond k Median storage veh) Upsfeam4ignaL(ft) .f =t , r: pX, platoon unblocked " vCx&ilhcbngvolunle, _ ',:,.4:„,:-..::7;4-..;,., `;; g 2 . 59 .. 30 2 90ry x` 29' „ .=a vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2r stage.2 aonf vol L vCu, unblocked vol 4 2 59 30 2 90 29 3 tC single(s}.. , ;4.1 4 i :"; t 17i : "z6S?. 62 71r 65 ff2 tC, 2 stage (s) tF(s1rr��k.‘. ._-,P - : ::22 ._ = )...,- ,22. -1= 35. ..4tT , 33 1 38, A(W 353 p0 queue free % 100 99 99 89 99 99 94 99 ,• cM 00,0 c (veh/h) 16 C7 y ,5620 , 887 857 i083r 803 -X557", 1b&4 Volumg:T'dtel` 'i'S { r.2 {` 1ri 15 5gfltel s,+ c `-nrY try +fzi r` rr " i F`':,xT`,=i Volume Left 0 12 5 4 ' z�. _.,x�-� •,,..� Volum a;Right 1 2 :43-1; 'r 5 . ;'r, cSH 1617 1620 877 870 Volumej_o.Gapacity 0:00 '001," 013 .:_0.07 _.. -= ,,.:,, r.. Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 1 11 5 " Contr`ol:belay(s):') " :- '00q251-3.::]::::-:P `_-_94 Lane LOS A A A Approach.Delay:.(s) U:0 . 5.3 9-7.z, 9 4 Approach LOS A A Average Delay 9.2 Intersection°Capacity Utilisation -20.9% ICU Level'of Service ' ``-. A `: Analysis Period (min) 15 • Alam 2007 PM Existing Mead Place (LSC#070010) Page 4 LSC, Inc. HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2007 PM Existing 12: Hunters Cove Rd & CR 7 2/20/2007 t 1 P ti 1 • kariati . Lane Configurations y ti 4 Sian, ontrot .:, :Stop Free ' fr Grade 0% 0% 0% a Volume(uehfh) . 7 3≥; t11 tS . ,: 4 54 ;',r Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate(vph) . .. '. 3 121" 2(f 4 59 , Pedestrians an dttri19 g Walking Speed (ft/s) Farr rit8'lbckage : .. Right turn flare(veh) _. ..IT Mediap typ ;` None . .._ . Median storage veh) � - "__ .... - - •,-`_- Upstream signal j#()x r, pX, platoon unblocked `" .° " vC, confli" ing"vbliti1e :198,'., 130. 140 ' :' £ .. ' '; vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2;stage 2 con?vol . ` vCu, unblocked vol 198 130 140 tC,single(51F ., ' 6.4 6.2" : , -- ' 41 tC, 2 stage(s) tFis ... -,47.5,- :,,,-.8,.:3,-;',:-: 2'27 _.;. • p0 queue free % 99 100 100 ' ,, • cM capacity'(veh/h) 7813 .1:-„916:::::::-.2.,i;--,...7,;;; ;.1-0:1„. . Orin idtal, - ` ' 't:' "149 -s'' 63,2, z + `.m -�-'_-` a, iyikA rt4 .S.., -s 5".� _ --s `{ --,' n'ct'"' � r`tV ems„, Volume Left 8 0 4 Volume Right_ :3 20:',, .[---.10-,T-,-., cSH 824 1700 1443 Volume Capacity 0 01 -:-.-0:68 .= 0.00 Queue Length 95th (ft) 1 0 0 (pfltroLDelay'(s). . -9.4` 0.0 - 05'; .;r„ - Lane LOS A A :. ApptoacC ©efay(s) ,-„-..,.:,....-:94., A0.0 = 0.5 Approach Lbs A Ctmarj O• ,`.tom.ax.:-. :- n^t° ₹s ' r +�4"t; f -''''''—.1•11-r1"741:._' "--2 Average Delay 0.6 Intersection,Capacity Utilization 16.9% , ICU Level of Service ` A. Analysis Period (min) 15 •Alam 2007 PM Existing Mead Place (LSC #070010) Page 5 LSC, Inc. HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2007 PM Existing 14: WCR 32 & Hunters Cove Rd 2/20/2007 s Lane Configurations 4> 4+ 4) 4+ Sigrr ntr k lfree Free Stop �-Stop , Grade 0% 0%0 0% 0% VoltMe~(vehlh .f . 0 t0 1 2 14 9,, 2 . 7 ,9 3. . 5 i 2 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hour fl v raie,(vphj . . .: ` ,; 1 : 2::-:; ?-:::40t:, :10 2.. 8 . 1a 3. . 1. „. 2 Pedestrians kage<, th(ft R-. .fir, -' Walking Speed (ft/s) P.erce_hIBl&kagn .. . . 4 .. . - 4 4 •• - F Right turn flare(veh) ' ' " ' Median tK a z n. _.. R,.�.. ,max. .. .. �'�-...o-`,'a.��. x.., � :: ....�.; .. . .. .�dflB M1ris.-:-, ' :��tbh� ��':; Median storage veh) OWitit r naIi(ft) .1-V tiV`j '. . .'r " ' pX, platoon unblocked vC canflletki l je 25' .._F- . `12 39 w41 11' 49•.:`. 36 =`27 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2,stage 2Iconf Mit -_ vcu unblocked vol 25 12 39 41 11 49 36 _ 20 KO:, sing (s) . 'eY _ . ,41_.. i ' •-4 1 71 =6,5r-^1`7,4,-#1H--71:,-.7.41-, 65 6.2 tC, 2 stage(s) tF s}_.,y' ,..•' 422. . x,si,a:: .z . ;s22 - x55, =40 33r ,35, ;.' 40 33 p0 queue free % 100 100 100 99 99 100 100 100 } al cM capats Gvehfh 1569- . . .,. : 7- 1607 96₹ 850 1069 934• -855 :1O58 S YWrtcit a r:'l `a- fax, ._� t. -rsa:.z7�' '§ etc" v --- ^t .�..",k": e' Volume Left 0 2 2 3 Volurtre[ ight ' `'j k . ` 10 : ' 2 cSH 1589 1607 961 957 Volumetix Capacity :II 00 s 000 `0.02 6.01 Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 0 2 1 ` 4:6:610119714110:r- -(S:0-'.;' 0 6 8 8 '8,8 -" . Lane LOS A A A Approact Delay(s)' . 0`0;.,, .d.6 •w 8.8.= '8.8 Approach LOS A A ar Average Delay 3.8 Intersection Capacity Utilization -.'40,3%::,,:,,, ICU Level of.Service '' A r. - Analysis Period (mm) 15 • Alam 2007 PM Existing Mead Place (LSC#070010) Page 6 LSC, Inc. HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2030 AM Bkgnd_TC 4: SH 66 & CR 7 3/7/2007 III f _. c 4- k4\ r P \ i d MI. a _''�� Lane Configurations VI tt r '' ++ Id aLf=faV Wi � � d „t900 1900x: 6tk_tViiia Total Lost time(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 eiln aJ�.:arac.,e.s.+.�. "¢r 'W5�-.a,. r.-A. :w- �,; .. '°.C,✓"s: ":�-. Sia' ._..-'".:`?� �;��rr�'. •. S�w:4.. Satd. Flow(prot) 343. 3 3539 1583 3433 3539 1583 1770 1863 1583 1770 1863 1583 Satd Flow(perm) 3433 3539 1583 3433 3539 1583 1182 Va 1863_ 1583 1380 1863 1583 Peak hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 fg RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 68 0 0 30 0 0 0 0 0 0 a " v ' ` P� ,AR''-',..2 '0 " 25. 386:'_ .,1oq W: 2 Turn Type Prot Perm Prot Perm pm+pt Free pm p+ t Free ik P � ,..- &: �?.. ��:qe,Z ; _ ,: _ - 5;- 2 : �,_ _.: .s l�i'+! tl.� Ltl_T 9Y �' � ` _ Permitted Phases 4 8 2 Free l 6 Free A ti7� 2 '�� i.fig' �r h;• t .` t 3 4t' a -`' .. 42.6 31 0.. 100 0 32 �' `�17Ft 4 Effective Green, g (s) 6.7 38.4 38.4 7.0 38.7 38.7 42 6 .31.0 100 0 32.6 21,521.:0t9.0,0 3,.. - _A gato COO E 'I a i9 '043 , `031 : .03 ' 1 Clearance Time(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Grp Cap(vph) 230 1359 608 240 1370 613 584 578 1583 480 466 1583, v/s Ratio Perm 0.03 0.01 c0.11 c0.24+ 0.05 0.14 M. .'- ..„ 'a.37 ,0:55 " " ''?4-81-1 � 4Q404rt '�� .. 6 Uniform Delay, dl 44 6 24.1 19.5 •45.0 22.7 19.0 18 9� 24.1 0.0 24.1 28 6 0.0 rf gr Factor 1.39 0.41 0.09 ,0_90 k; ' r � X04' 1,00 1:0 1.00 ' 1.00 1 00[ Incremental Delay, d2 1.0 0.5 00 2.9 0.2 0.0 0-4 0.1 0.4 0 2 0 3 0.2 Der . R ;- 62:g ` 103 1:8 43_3'1' :1.74' 19..5 19.3; 24.3 ' 0.4 24.3 28:94„c1,2 .2 Level of Service E B ADBBBC ACC A APl clt ei (s) 14.0 - "5 • 22 0 7.9 • 9 7` Approach LOS B C A A R '.:_... HCM Average Control Delay 14.4 HCM Level of Service B HMO Volume to.Mapacity ratid.• - 0.47 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 00.0 Sum of lost time (s) 12 a ` " Intersection Capacity Utdizatio , 50:6% ICU Level of Service =_;r ��''+ Analysis Period (min) 15 C Critical Lane Group' 7 V. , ..: ..M..,., :s:. •s,, __ • Ben Waldman 2030 AM Bkgnd_TC Mead Twon Center(LSC#070010) Page 1 LSC, Inc. HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2030 AM Bkgnd_TC 10: WCR 32 & CR 7 317/2007 f t -1 t /� ti 1 1 Lane Configurations Volume (vph) 10 15 31 23 15 20 27 83 27 10 169 10 P P Hour` ac r n 0 ".:m= :. 09 _ "Vat f 92 , Hourly flow rate (vph) 11 16 34 25 16 22 29 90 29 11 184 11 +1 a Volume Total(vph) 61 63 149 205 • Volume Right(vph) 34 22 29 11 War . .: Flaux Departure Headway(s) 4.5 4.7 4.4 4.4 Capacity(veh/h) 726 703 787 788 Approach Delay(s) 7.9 8.1 8.3 8.8 pra.:;,E4,41,44cte,,t.kr47. „AA • HCM Level of Service A fnterseetia704aai utilization ,49 ='29.s4% M ICU;Les4ei₹r'f , ice �S ' _ a� "'S Analysis Period (min) 15,. x r • Ben Waldman 2030 AM Bkgnd_TC Mead Twon Center(LSC#070010) Page 2 LSC, Inc. HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2030 AM Bkgnd_TC 12: Hunters Cove Rd & CR 7 3/7/2007 • P wt c t Lane Configurations . Grade 0% 0% `, 0% 4 a _j P "tinfa SEL1 , SIr Peak Hour�F}_actor_ 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.01Mt>. 3....:.._a,r.-afra.F xtv� cSs4' -RJer-x3`" atCY„ a Pedestrians 0.107iltaaARSISZTISr Walking Speed(ft/s) fi l tom." -;3, ' ` '� a'€ �<Y a"•s*i,- . Ce4��_° ad`'' i�'.:e''. P it'tIcnO s....,�e ,at F a, t'" �.e '₹ �hhs.'. ,.,_..: . r , Right turn flare(veh) � Mteaxa. Median storage veh)µ . . .wrlat y.�r .....F , - +. ,:'.- ..-«. se .-4c Fa- aa�t+�Ti tC u'�". , .t"#�i i�. pX, platoon unblocked v4ir5tTtttte X93 15 t 14> -. r vC1, stage 1 conf vol V� 2 �St�2 a'. `C uif' (bi iy _+gr� .,.aft ;e'�. .'z y".,`f-Ria 4, .... ` vCu, unblocked vol 393 145 148 ,�":..,�" -'tG�strtgFe�#��i�s.: . , .ry 6� b 6-.�1,.�}t.;.. �.. ,,..�,:anttli;. �" Q?a:,��..�z.,L-:.� ��"�4x, as� Es: �,,`t �w tC,/2 stage (s) tF(s}N S--t i 3r` P , _'3.'.5 c t "''fn"r +,.�.2 a xt a MI* �w p0 queue free % 96 99 100 • el`?�>�a ,st�(ve� � sa��* .902'{� f`", ��- �'t4$�"gtn v— _. Volume Left 27 0 5 Vo1uW113.1 ht' I.,;. 5 S.. / f 0 _ t .w z : 0.1 q W k &a '; 3 cSH 644 1700 1434 _ten: u91uMe fii Cap:4clty 0'91:01-,9101K0 00 Queue Length 95th (ft) 4 0 0 Go tro t)efa ($i 1 t?9 0 0 0'2 Lane LOS B A APRroi et(Delay(s)'- 1t 9 00'x': 02 .. .. `1, , _c . zt,ka nt r ", ->``f Approach LOS B "" Average Delay 1.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 25 5% '' ": ICU Le et of.Service " Analysis Period (min) 15 • Ben Waldman 2030 AM Bkgnd_TC Mead Twon Center(LSC#070010) Page 3 LSC, Inc. HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2030 AM Bkgnd_TC 14: WCR 32 & Hunters Cove Rd 3/7/2007 * Lane Configurations gra: WOr1h0 ta t t *.` � etl sa e k Tt Trfa "S:..;r `^' a _sti*. ik': �tea-'�,�x if��."_�1y 1"a*..m 'i.e �,tt Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 H "u' f! r 5 4fi `" w5 MI5 A_ 2 g �1� -„ �� e . " �n �-.�_ s� �":fax �., �� }�,..�-,.a�.:., t; �r�- Pedestrians ay xa La �*# k }10_, i t z: - X- ^&;. "hj 'eif <,:i„ w-F. ,Ei r," ~:•- . �,t r +. :�4 , 3 .X." r+� ,c'=?'i,F � �r.: f.,a.�,u4vi.'S 'S''f.a...r .a,�av_ Walking Speed (ft/s) " M {ary5 p t Right �fturn �.�.flare(veh)gfd T' v4 iiftit :T,L7,{ Si4.. e r.1�F;nF4 5a a a4'Y.C-2`: Yset : 1'�, ©irt_._mr '. C-rv".' .'-_{+yYA Median storage veh) ""` tJ tfkair sigis l -V � w,-.w xx�a ,.a.ma flfTe �.-,:,„ �,»xr,�,r..y . .sev uY. _ ., .., .. . _�_ �'` R��r�e.z'�Aa .•i �'tns ;r � pX, platoon unblocked v „? 45igrfe5 uto W4 M§ `51 m ...`i36 x,'-1,2 , 48,, 1l3`� 2 -5 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vCu unblocked vol 58 51 136 128 48 133 128 55 tCysm,1sj " : ` `z ,14' . _.. : ;4 4 7 t g -x'62' ;T Tr-.ta i , tC, 2 stage (s) , tR ) .'gfaL_ t.P > t:f :67a 22 `.- 35a"t4'0 R3,3 ' V34St p0 queue free % 100 100 99 99 99 99 99 99 cM`c*A*yefi(h,)tka,OVStiJ : r 1555 � ;rt � " X17 �� 5 ""� 2t "s ��. , P`w _ 1a�. t's�k: .. Yr�.� a +n.`sS�xz`.c.15- ' _•L Sian t?:., -' Ar:4 g4tile,r s', X e = =46`"r X22 x.., C e a, Volume Left 5 5 5 5 Volume Etrghtza r 5, e5# 5 . cSH 1547 1555 851 826 Volumefo tapacltyx== 4. x 0 00'- v Q 90 `0 02 0_:03 ¶ $' Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 0 1 2 ..-x Cartto!.Delay(sr k ` i7 .,:t. ; 9 3 ', Lane LOS A A A A Approach Delay,(s)s f 0:7, . Q 7 9.3 9:5 s Approach LOS A A R r � ': t` ^-*„'"' 4 -_` � � Y II fl ¢y Average Delay 2,8 IntersectiortCapacitylltilzation I4.0% ICU Levet'ofService . q _ Analysis Period(min) 15 • Ben Waldman 2030 AM Bkgnd_TC Mead Twon Center(LSC#070010) Page 4 LSC, Inc. HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2030 AM Bkgnd_TC 22: Road B & CR 7 3/7/2007 t { ~ 4 4\ t t ' 1 r Lane Configurations 4) gt cr �yt' ', ' -r` ia'.t4 ."sr J as " * : ;`t �n""re._2 Y Y'9! f�a : tanii s�?, Grade s_..,fS-.�t w m.,� ...'rR,.l�„u -r ....�..i�e �C ,m ,.;Y..� w C?t...^s�..'�$-:�' ss.._fir o�na ,. v:`i:,_�.F�S, �19- '", '��+ 0% 0% 0% 0% 032615;*::;V .i'd.._ tom. Y wA' nalgffitila tt ` io'r`.; , r.4 xysalIr,ia%` ' -r:gits! Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 (192 0.92 wft ra°t't v h 4,1 (g)47 % ` +' 0 s fi 2 � a � ,& Pedestrians ai R , '_i Walking Speed (ft/s) ' ".atThig145a „_i ��,�",r....#x'..3 .s.'i"=.,.a-' .�-"�-Are'x,. -TA '€..^fi(r: "� 's.�vak t x e s 71:11 s..i ..0.- '. sF', da,...,. ssT.cs...�-"._£'-v Right turn flare (veh) f1. `i`f ty�.,6 es ..₹ `•� Qrle :. $" ellaW gSfect i. `. 3 aif o : ib Median storage veh) Up E j SeaJ(ft),. i eiit r .` 11 "sr.+rat dy sr�.YE-o. oc .� : ti re s a:s . �._ x'",.r_ �x,x..a�x: � -: � "„�'x .rrs ,�,. pX, platoon unblocked g�O e-�x� 417 4t5'_: 269 4 2' ' a /," c .�y^ 1, „N e. t 1ld `3$ ft°` ; �s.:rh a n am ¢ ¢�_l.�:,.+s§. �1�T��x2 J, a ,�;n�.,.�� .�':J �w=s;�� vC1, stage 1 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 417 415 269 462 418 124 273 124 fOacli t,l1,,,, A' tC,j{2 stage ty��``� (s)�{ $. E� s `t_ v ��; � t'ne}T'wR.£Eftti W - .,.. "4. a 4.�*n .e. 4a�3i11 % i f,. ao}; g�W: w1 rac& ,zswearyrC 9 • p0 queue free 96 97 95 100 99 100 99 100 �0. %2a 0101t.i1 .53,g 4 ,iota a C 9 7. 12x0 3 x ire h Volume Left 23 0 11 0 cSH 633 521 1290 1463 Queue Length 95th (ft) 11 1 1 0 C r io 1 Yls ss` _ , Lane LOS B B AY. APproae belay(s)- 11 5 12.,41,;;;;, 0 7 oCo Approach LOS B B Average Delay 2.1 Intersection Capacity,Utilization 1-:,7311_8°4-?x: iCIt LeVel of.Servide q Analysis Period (min) 15 • Ben Waldman 2030 AM Bkgnd_TC Mead Twon Center (LSC#070010) Page 5 LSC, Inc. HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2030 AM Bkgnd_TC 24: Road A & CR 7 3/7/2007 r ~ t 1 t ti t .. tit .wit`RED ,: ritTiM lt5 `?3$ , tt r 7 i7 Lane Configurations � y, � t � � Skit s t w yr� ^kgi..-w�.5�.:',T. Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% FZcN tes,_4g ,.., i`, fg52"a.,,=,ixt T '- ::q.tX243,.._,f t'3 =:dr . ''""fr:l taT�o * 0.92 td Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 —0.92 Nd l � t s � °1 'aii`z "`a . ' !P$ rt 4 "4XgiM ,P i aaid : �2 , kf • Pedestrians Walking.Speed (AAfUs) Rea Right turn flare(veh) _ xyT' Median storage veh) pX, platoon unblocked Ml nl , ` '4t, . iaW -203 ",5.29 k 4Y9 12 ,V•S04'f f , n , i29 , vC1,stage 1 conf vol - ' f " vCu, unblocked vol 472 468 293 529 479 123 304 123 tC, 2 stage(s) .tom 4041119-4:0):0433-e ' 0: Z 4a22, E ,t t 6 gKiet • p0 queue free % 97 98 92 100 98 100 98 100 4 : 6LE 2 t48 jtt$ #, , 928 = 1256 ' , ' 148`4 ` °Q J' t .: Ij 4�IgS fit riMi a 1 :sf.a W1415 '5"`'t3Wih *- r Volume Left 13 0 0 0 26 0 0 0 0 0 ¢7 Q = 0zyco .,0'f ' o). 0 a ..s0 ^'0,: cSH 488 695 1700 476 1256 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 €i a if W,4f 03, k 0.09'- 000 ::0:0? 0t12 007 .100` 0110, 047,x; 001 ::' ::' Queue Length95th (ft) 2 8 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 Ltr, _ti as_ 1aT. 00 127 4,:g ooW; ab ,:a.Q,-...ao `. oQ Lane LOS BB AB A Atte) ,i 160 12 7, 1 4` 0:0 Approach LOS g g Average Delay 2.2 lnt Idh :apatitjutihzation ,33.9%'- lCLNLevelnf Se`ni ae > -p= Analysis Period (min) 15 • Ben Waldman 2030 AM Bkgnd_TC Mead Twon Center(LSC#070010) Page 6 LSC, Inc. HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2030 AM Bkgnd_TC 25: Road C & CR 7 3/7/2007 • f _. - c "- t 4\ t t " 1 1 ei"', t. .1, ,,,:,.:4-.4-;-:!, .'., : i' • a'n '.,,,v91 9v x. h,-;.m ` R7e ra t°� rx`, y i-�' sii 'r^Tal . Lane Configurations 4+ 4 4, : t" �' t oPY ° i'' 1� azgyk [ ;may{ Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 MUM, yg �?y e+�}w }+}fig d F. -, r adr- G,14. .2 .4'r 3%g•.iT'YYT'k k'e F , A.a ,WAK Walking Speed (Ws) Right turn flare(veh) Median storage veh) r�t,_,-n-�', Art- t # Az' 4,1 74 Pitta,aft '}i. W.F,•" ,S#4.'. rv${ .1-1:"' 1 pX, platoon unblocked ve© f 0 € to _ "lkftW 4, l28 '* ' ej,ra vC1, stage 1 conf vol X 11 �S_ � on1t '% _ s ° as .�+��c: x. A 'c."*,-v,'' " t. ...�:: c:.r y r3 ¢2'°, a"+;7!c,i ,,r it." '2v ..f- *``q.. - - -v i..N�a ,R�YS"u 4 vCu, unblocked vol 415 415 264 424 415 145 264 145 tari1t1 Yip# _t T :, a. t -NtEtt 'e* „a'e 4 acM: i1 tC, 2 stage(s) trt y n • p0 queue free% 99 100 99' 100 100 100 100 100 Volume LLe^fth 3 0 3 0 ZoleiRW.f)t� .. a iS , _y .iN'- ,. M . W;s R '.!'„x cSH 702 1700 1300 1438 ggcjVftrsalaGit D P 0"o2 rt. a4r� v o oo%* .` - .z+ ., :`Tet g" , =t e , Queue Length 95th (ft) 1 0 0 0 Lane LOS B A _ A A Pio ppli,ike " F42 T tkp yT Ub- ",., "' . L ry "M 4M Approach LOS B A Average Delay 0.4 Inter?e bartCft as Ublrza_L_on af 122 % .` ` fCULevetof,Service Ac T -/ Analysis Period (min) 15 • Ben Waldman 2030 AM Bkgnd_TC Mead Twon Center(LSC#070010) Page 7 LSC, Inc. HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2030 PM Bkgnd_TC 4: SH 66 & CR 7 3(7/2007 I• -► r '- k t `► yg�1 1 .�r : e.aA' 41�r,. 1'-311 � Lane Configurations W tt r vi tt r 4 r� ' t r ►de 0low vphpi) _ 1 190 JAM .+ .. TIOXr te . _ -Sr! Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane'-gla tractor N... 0 kt `55 ''t o w;E . , 4-7131 I `` Q h 'y9 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00_ 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.15-y¢ 1.00 1.00 0.85 Fits rot"ecte' w* ter- fi e ' s`0 ' . teri x ' V , Satd.t�a Flow(prot) 3433. 3539 1583^ 3433 353.9 1583 1770 1863 1583 1770 1863 1583 FS er ..a .t4•_Y t� Mss`. L0 ' ' "'` `Y x w.., ' S • zS • .• -: Satd. Flow(perm) 3433 3539 1583 3433 3539 1583 1317 1863 1583 1367 1863 1583 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 RTOR Reduction(vph) 0 0 183 0 0 81 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane'Gronli. ibw ph)W 2. c,66 e s A j ;e= ,1 9'; 3 SAYMIPMFaelfaS2 Turn Type Prot Perm Prot Perm pm+pt Free pm+pt Free Protected Phases;N, _ .., .ii r t €K AaS?, . a x` Permitted Phases 4 8 2 Free 6 Free Actuated Green G°(s) .11a m34 1 ti 3 :17 7 X4€0 x 40 329 2 10 : e$1141til E ' Effective Green, g (s) 11.5 34.1 34.1 17.7 40.3 40.3 32.9 20.1 100.0 31.5 19.4 100.0 Actuated g/C Ratio , a 0;12 '-434,; 0 34 0.18' (_`4 0'33 '0 20' 100 0 3 "'w. ,,.'' Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Vehicli,C xtension (s)'`•`V 3�0 ` _3.0: aFfl . t' S 0° t wai"` .0 Rt IMA a Lane Grp Cap(vph) N395 1207 540 608 1426. 638 _ 491 374 1583 479 361 1583 v/s Ratio Prot t # 0 06 x; 0 A i 'c012 =r_: .., 3.. rol �.t.' 0102 .ks � ,.a'-'t-.- "* 'r. s T� v/s Ratio Perm m 0.06 0.03 c0.08 c0.19 0.08 0.09 v/c Ratio , , ; ,, 10532 e.0 55 -*'Aft 7 0 0 0. l,g 0 'kW-PAW' Uniform Delay, d1 41.7 26.7 23.1 38.6 23.9 18.5 25.4 32.5 0.0 26.2 33.2 0.0 Progression3Factor 1.23 057�' 0 28 , 108 059 'ww 6)61 * 100Y 5 O Y 1 100s 111,0 _,r . r -u. s_.z a k ... rzt .�+�x, .z..4 ,� a Incremental Delay, d2 1.3 0.5 0.1 2.6 0.7 0.0 0.5 0.5 0.3 0.5 0.6 0.1 flitat@X 54.9. .7 .,156E 6.5 „44.4 .a1h7 hm11`4 , 25.9 _ 33'_t.s 03;x` 26 7 33`'7. Level of Service D ' B A D B BCC ACC A Approach Dela.(s) 20,6"T 1231]" " 11F8r,'' r Z aAk Approach Los C C B B HCM Average Control Delay 19.9 HCM Level of Service B HCM Volume to apacity rat o 0 537 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 100.0 Sum ofylost of S time(s) 8.0 �r . r ,g lnterseetion.Capacity Utilisation . '`. '55 2!0 ,t, '_ ICU;LevelService - : B Analysis Period (min) 15 c ' Critical Lane Group • Ben Waldman 2030 PM Bkgnd_TC Mead Twon Center(LSC#070010) Page 1 LSC, Inc. HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2030 PM Bkgnd_TC 10: WCR 32 & CR 7 3f7/2007 -' - t t " 1 J Lane Configurations y4.* Sig ontro s. .. ,. : JW Volume (vph) 10 20 38 32 15 10 36 141 35 10 98 10 Pe fio, F,ct. n, 9 _ + h 92#` .92 `"092 ' tk92 °0,?3 .°.� .z.., a O R 09 :„ 0 22 Hourly flow rate(vph) 11 22 41 35 16 11 39 153 38 11 107 11 Volume Total (vph) 74 62 230 128 gteggirw. 3 _ ']o'f, ter£ tfo"ate' { xe T.l1 ^r. Ara z. Volume Right(vph) 41 11 38 11 F1 s ° ° ` 0 0'.09 'Y' x�" � � § yak. Departure Headway(s) 4.5 4.9 4.3 4.5 DegreiUtrll tto * C1 - y 1PR 6`4 a s i Capacity(veh/h) 725 679 797 761 Gon!trid D 'lay . 7 LitT 90 8 3 .'x; ctit'.T ,, :tall' 4` ti. Approach Delay(s) 8.0 8.3 9.0 8.3 MPr0 c ' 'u ` '`fi'p aA ..�4 ` F:. I ". r 4 s m �^5 - m z .. a : 'rag. � � �..c. .'xa ,i4;Twk- �+.,,,�>;.r�a �a..A...,. -re'u4 .�?�"..,- ,n,.`'+ F � "'` �.s��'�+ -A..�.-�4;��. -tat; frPriViiia:54z4-errinan •,;;Ifitt- alarm HCM Level of Service A Intersection 40-WUtTrzation 33r9<°%a , 'q ICLJ Level of Service T Z, `gF 'a fa i :.rh Analysis Period (min) 15 1 • se $ ",k't6` tB : 'x a yg c=,. sf,, # u--t ..,�; 5.ag s3". 2 ,: '^*rr ; a ..._. .s.ry S.a ,._.c �.� Y ., ..ma .._.:��..<�Kv_ -rv+ rt.S �R., �.. � r.'�a.�s..,.h:�. • Ben Waldman 2030 PM Bkgnd_TC Mead Twon Center(LSC #070010) Page 2 LSC, Inc. HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2030 PM Bkgnd_TC 12: Hunters Cove Rd & CR 7 3/7/2007 Lane C o_nyfiggurations ►1t 4 -'a 411W . - j$ffd =`,`Y"saggCeµ #^u'<ts ,LIs 'y `Ere ..Te,+"' .,*,« aE' -: #Wr Grade 0% 0% 0% `.�m.�hµvihaillhiAlditaita .F41 ' MXC .: 41Srw.lidnwa.A: i.vv u1.q.w� k.M�`.=�r�+��aa*s, ::Y�R �n Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Ffaf°itnti ` fairfata:el , .. 5 ti tin A- Zt'�'€... 5 rat `'"``,1 ,14; ' ama iN v i�',,�,� Pedestrians Walking Speed (ft/s) . ., Right turn flare(veh) Median storage veh) U s I pX, platoon unblocked Vg; R s.!n A inJ '429 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 429 241 252 tC,/2�stage (s) 1«l. "' " .-:nx8t . .h* :fie s x•'^'•. ..rt vq t S .Rt- �,+�s+";'�'L �o-J..�:�r `�,�-- . ., .�z�- � . ;`_;. "�k�a��'1 �i �rv'XF`s� ti��r. • p0 queue free% 98 99 100 o,: opa eic4,) 58t . 798:;,. t i; {J �3?% t r: M VAit1 soI' v 2s.212 183 f "' ., T ' a„ o .` Volume Left 11 0 5 Vorui_ k}tight .;' 22ry;k .,,0 -'` ` ',bartVi cSH 638 1700 1313 VolWrhe4to apaeity ,U t)3 ',: 0.15 -.6A?0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 2 0 0 Controt-G)eIa9(SY Lane LOS B A Apgroact Delay(s) ti 10 8; O:U 0.3 a= F Approach LOS B Average Delay 0.5 Intersection Capacity Utilisation 22.6% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 • • Ben Waldman 2030 PM Bkgnd_TC Mead Twon Center (LSC#070010) Page 3 LSC, Inc. HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2030 PM BkgndTC 14: WCR 32 & Hunters Cove Rd 3/7/2007 -fr f t 4\ t P ti j d afir~ : z f; Lane Configurations 4, 4 p ' s c OtI kB a , °£.. `s re , :. „ Sv4 R"Z 0 x ,*Tv,. ._�.. .-%'a _ . . . � free` +g.�";y,$�..-. _. -_.x�t.. ��.' . . "`��"j�frs Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% i )si•,.I`. $* I °5 . k,4r .fr& ' 5, .;_1, letTSP iN5.. ' ATII: ..t$, Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 092 0.92 '0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0 92 Pedestrians _ Meat Meat s.." tyzitf- l.a ., ' .$, -t t c g a. Rf"tx-t. .:w.:.'- v,r Y ;, • 'v' s,,-k; Walking SpeeNde5d��(ft/s) Right ig turn flare (veh) +� ' 4 .zc aiy % • ,. r"^w "r „ r a a _t x ' -e. rr a t-R ti, # Nhe� Median storage veh) .A n* pX, platoon unblocked V� 4 e -`.3 . -,'. .• 65 5,,; . „' 149 14') t62, x'146 F 141% ` vC1, stage 1 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 57 65 149 141 62 146 141 54 t 4 i .r ... ;_.•. sa 4 1 7 . ....tax 6 2 n 71 ;: 5 2 tC, 2 stage(s) ..__ . ... tg . -s w y"r, c ,n. `. ;. a . `2 2 `:�. -.-�. 3 5 x 4tga 11 ; 3 5 ,. 0^� •C • p0 queue free % 100 100 99 99 99 99 99 99 c gR i x.1548 ` 4, .?5'37 .pot, 745 2 r4A9 _t f45 3, • `""€'a`S� '� i•�t' � . , 6' w"A2'2.,�•F . ?^ `" tS'�'�' .a * '-t ey�","*k' y- �M 3iY C �A"G"a5.nxctx-^.4..t"k... •s.. =+` r$ . . __ u.. - -.z' +�_.x 3.s#'r '.,e. .fi2'4rn�§��'�u Volume Left 5 5 5 5 Va0 rre ardia 4 ,*a cSH 1548 1537 836 815 Valugq!t ppQ. E..Q0©, 002x003 Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 0 1 2 Ct3gtlf &764 0 _.07 94 '° ;9'5 ', Lane LOS A A A A Approach LOS A A _- Average Delay 2.6 IntersecttOKatO cIfy utihzaficn 14.4% e . _ ICU Level of Seivice A Analysis Period (min) 15 • Ben Waldman 2030 PM Bkgnd_TC Mead Twon Center(LSC#070010) Page 4 LSC, Inc. • HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2030 PM Bkgnd_TC 22: Road B & CR 7 3/7/2007 7 j 4 ' t r' ' 1 r r= _ .... . ,L . .3. ': 9, .'t.,,l §k �I<K Y'-f�z. ;ITti 3 ti a' �'`��"t'T i _ -:� 1��: � � 'at rr i7 t,'- F'i '�rZ n i�' 9 i - � � �. Lane Configurations A 4, 43 4, :,,e vftF'r; ' axgi irgr i'S.�_.' ""::. ,# F[e& 3 .,.: :�,C 6 ! to Grade M � W f 0% 0% 0% 0% a' x': ps$ ` 2r r 0: l"� ...w x $39`�,�2'29 ..;`�.; ` ,...4 .x�j48 s4,& Peak Hour Factor 0.92 092 092 092 092 0.92 092 092 092 092 0.92 092 H `1 Malt/ .... :j4 r -4 t 4 _ 'a � ,,V r. 17m _ 42 X249, 't` 4A 0 `a' ..r: Zr Pedestrians • Walking Speed(ft/s) � "' - . '�, g¢.n' WRA ra *.+ IY t.•`.4 y. .i r3" ''e : - " t. .i -i" ` -'iy gRight turn flare(veh) _ y p� - 3 } u i,i „n.: ' t1o�Tf a^t- x " .},? x£54`Qb I,' ._..'�i-'v.,.`s {3. i-4' . :i gr- +.d"r:'a ._: Median storage veh) Ih }�7r,. , ' x ". .� .'i"" "N�""c„.,=x,. . '$,.- F ,.. ..x t .. .•a:EE�s-° pX, platoon unblocked t! ,. &f7t•h 509r=? *7 ¢,,523 249»;1189 ' Z t - i. vC1, stage 1 conf vol 9:e2 vCu, unblocked vol 517 509 175 537 523 249 189 249 F, y tC, 2 stage(s) p0 queue free% 97 98 97 100 96_4,100_97._ 100 fi� l e 1 r 445 45 4ef 445 a78 �aC a nan r * WW45,.,V+. a °"sue '�' r351 ' F �_ ....n 'E+ �F.`a is r terra' d r �,'�3r�-h�a'_.i �V3•olume Left 14 0 42 0 cSH 596 445 1385 1317 voCyrt11 Queue Length 95th (ft) 6 3 2 0 Lane LOS B B A pRFfl+ f"s} 1:16_ t34 '. 14ti, '(YO ' t..r Approach LOS B B Average_Delay 2.1 tMers uoritapaedy Utilizati n 42 7% LC(}L^evel of Service A Analysis Period(min) 15 • Ben Waldman 2030 PM Bkgnd_TC Mead Twon Center(LSC#070010) Page 5 LSC, Inc. HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2030 PM Bkgnd_TC 24: Road A & CR 7 3/7/2007 C •—- t4\ t \ '10 1:77,;, i L I % :i'' ) `� 1°4iff Lane Configurations situa�itt'al� e m. t t'(j +5r°.s. :t-zp e. , #n ts-^'z a,3 „„ ,l -1;. Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% ,�y� Iahe:4g4it t:y.- z €t 2 Z " rt96 (k a > fa m �� ..�_�. �e ,. t-.r.�J� AFex' 5,-r:s# . 3,x�-,max.�s�3.:r� � �...'F.�'��t�sx ,�' 0 -'. ' 132��";6 Peak Hour Factor 0.62-0:92- 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 HOMO;rat tki rr '°; I ;f 2 3i D t a1. ,#Ot1 0.4 2 0 , O m O! is`t'4.4 :6nt, Pedestrians �'� A t*Wi "` .b..- :n-. , . .,'an.s �aaa°.S+.Y.�Sx..+' ': ne.^€ , c . ,,,W .s "� §` �� yy -yYi t ., �.-, x Y t � Y-`, � 2 � v �a �x ,tom^,, d'k` � Walking Speed (ft/s) P 45EtWP B�'.` .[ lta .Gi #J'tigt n ..`Y, T {'2�'R r- RTIA �`e�' UIFF _ ,. '':5 .-Lag 'F. Pi �Right�ryi turn flare (veh) ` NtCf�lfd : . frtaf$ UnCg', .�'.*.,-:iZ'�5 , eICW i,A+P .-�?.. t.-F.vtr"�'. i. �R : i Median storage veh) P Ste attia1Ek a * £a._ 3r. «5 r Z i 84 T t -e t !, pX, platoon unblocked vE`sgon" tItC£in9'Y g ' &U9; ,5QQ x:,` 143 1 22 37t 2SSQf f85 ₹. ; 250 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 609 596 143 822 637 250 185 250 -T tgZWSXstk F `, 7 t 6>5 =' 6'2 `,7.1 8. �'41 __a�x.+v p.�r....s .6 b .�� .n .ir c. _,. #- -��€� - .v: ..::4i tC, 2 stage (s) tF ($t i t #t ; i . a.,.i.' 3_ 45 fAIO F 3;ffag2 t - '¢,K .- 22 tt a _ p0 queue free% 89 93 76 100 93 100 93 100 • 'RX §"t7 _�04 . . 00 Z 9 cA!tc�k?�E�Yk�� tl� -� -�4�� -�S"t� .a `�ttt�, ��; �- k�'��t6 M yf , {. � A +S +{sLV �.�� - Y-L't.T'til.r ` ,;! " as4=, (+s i ; -. 1 y, Vs1tu Volume Left 41 0 0 0 101 0 0 0 0 0 Vo(ttr tehR�ght atp n `2(3y= 0 ; ; 0 0 , ; 0 r'0 `''rzs0xf* 41 cSH 363 785 1700 366 1390 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 Votorryo tapapae t 0't1'y 0 31 Queue Length 95th (ft) 10 32 0 6 6 0 0 0 0 0 cantrol ay?st iw 162 116 ` '00' ':156 8 4,0 00 '%O _00; 0.0 Lane LOS C B AC A Appcoactl` eIa?(j), ., ., 12:.3 .. 15 6. .: o ;2 2: °"0:0 Approach LOS B C to :!.%:0i .t....St±c.,ir :a_ g r e s> „ Average Delay 5.5 Intersection-Capagityit,Iization . 38:9% .Level of.S_eivice { Analysis Period (min) 15 • Ben Waldman 2030 PM Bkgnd_TC Mead Twon Center(LSC#070010) Page 6 LSC, Inc. HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2030 PM Bkgnd_TC 25: Road C & CR 7 3/7/2007 1 • • ...a;u:_b.......,,.a.4^�: _. u. :.1E� :.:.11, V!'4P DA 1 ._.._ idq' i P _i Lane Configurations 4) 4 Stgr antra €,' f[5;Ar ��' iaai fie4�s`qg -�br�g s gYE: � Grade 0% 0% 0% gakifjiWtfeI5� 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 H otlrl iat + W—Wi . L ` 064: t; rot , Ttt ' ;T5�R ,"t K* itl ` - 4 Pedestrians Walking Speed (ft/s) _ 5 t- rl:-�. � �.-FI�� .��.. i��Fx,�a-� � .-,.?': , ._ +.��s�Y'f.:��aWasu-y, llgig�.�.��, NZlijtT€o r:r" e�'x.?:�. Right turn flare(veh) Plcirti*Mirgd.il,r�'�e��"ghWarzg", a�'� �£.`tig1t -r,`�.,itatan:,�....': .�:,�."�'=i�:�...��.M Median n y _ Y �y. ,. _� 1 «l w storage veh) itg pX, platoon unblocked z on teErtr tlr"me F ` a6:V l* 6 -X48 ,2&. 48?.__ '°a l ., ,il5o ' ;J vC1, stage 1 conf vol u stage-2,corlf V0I :Zfilit m " s x, lf " c' 'ieb' T "t�. _'l s w ``xx �k.,fq`k y yx m vCu, unblocked vol 460 460 186 465 462 250 188 250 tgrM- t'l. )` _ :: .... f3 tkgLga*E2 , ` '� 8y5_ y 62_ `a4t p .a `7r, `A t_ rS s..`Y t�C, 2 stage(s) ddjj ] ]� J y " ,y�` �� tF i₹m..-yi 5 R F }y]� W V t a s-:IA "ae {{/,n*k{. 4T�.!{S`S t F, "fi.""Y'eF+F. � "i V vge W:a;_':S< _ " � 3 Fk �� i'te �.�. "Ni`� �.yC 4 �rhTF "L 3 YG � S:l • p0 queue free % 100 100 99 100 100 100 99 100 • > , �y`a°k 4 m ink k �rapacltl4�yeoY 8 �% �4�',�8 ,��. ��`�'9 _ CAB 8 ��. �� '1'�rf't3�E3�_�'� � �_... Volume Left 2 0 12 0 cSH 716 1700 1386 1316 Volurne to Capacity 0 0.1; 0.00 '- o. © t Queue Length 95th (ft) 1 0 1 0 Controtpetaytsj .:- tOlt1± ff0.__ 04, , . a`* Y ,. j Lane LOS B A A Approach gelayts) Approach LOS B A 4_k-µ^-�d+ry�f r w �`' # t ..�....i'.:aeJ., .� . . .... � x:[.� maY� -ai K':hw�ku" � i.,.:dii.nu'.u..Ya�....h'`m2ed' - �.. >.ht...a.. ... x ..r_z .. ,,.. .�v".I:.i.c_,.�......�l... .rY_km�sK.+rt.....�.c Average Delay 0.4 Intersection Capacity Utilization . 31_t% ICU Level of Service A4 .,.F Analysis Period (min) 15 • Ben Waldman 2030 PM Bkgnd_TC Mead Twon Center(LSC#070010) Page 7 LSC, Inc. HCM Signalised Intersection Capacity Analysis 2030 AM Total TC 4: SH 66 & CR 7 3/7/2007 ,c,(0.4 '.15,07,0;3K Lane Configurations ti tt r 'r tt p l f r ►I 4 pr ktearw(vphpl x°00 100 1900 S I9O0 19 Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0.m 4.0 • t=ans Dt l Factor " 0 9 t09 ' I1100-Rr 9 5 1 111 �a100 101 100 00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1 00 1.00 0.85 DIS. eP.N. :95"'100Kt60 5 1x00'1 095 .`^ " may ' 4�'aa R b M..a.' dnS 4 "��..M ., h � ..^'S.4+.�ti4g%.:hV' ?iF�� S �R G�aetw 4Sa*n:® 5u Satd. Flow(prot) 3433 3539 1583 3433 3539 1583 1770 1863 1583 1770 1863 1583 germ F edin tom10. 1 00 « *_ Q l oO 684 , ft ,.SQ 0 4 i ab;..A,1oTe Satd. Flow(perm) 3433 3539 1583 3433 3539 1583 1263 1863 1583 1374 1863 1583 Vo, ' ' h,. 1' 9 10? , . .a HI 0 Peak-hour p factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0_ g- a92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 a ,w �lvl'. 1 V 79 '"�r.c-+ . :fr ,' 4 s ''''t28,�u'.i.I.r RTOR Reduction(vph) 0 0 63 0 0 59 0 0 0 0 0 0 Eart&, co.ref lo* vp *. ,50` 1035- vz4a ae :z_ 0,' =rr3ad8 'l t" e. Turn Type P Prot Perm Prot Perm pm+pt Free pm+pt Free Prote ed hase F % h "€ aa4 su le-a -9, Permitted Phases 4 8 2 Free 6 Free Ast sated Greerr" (s) _ s9 8 435 43 51 3 9 7'y 4. -'',43 4`k`32.2F:9 'f9t8 ,104`0 `2,r4>m . Effective Green, g (s) 9.8 43.5 43.5 9.7 43.4 43.4 32.2 19.8 100.0 29.4 18.4 100.0 020`; '�00 Pat Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Ve rel Exte sio sj, =; 0 3.0.,'s. 0 t x.. 3.0 , „ X , . 1. Ci Lane Grp Cap (vph) 336 1539 689 333 1536 687 470 369 1583 448 343 1583 a v/s�atro Prot 0 04 'c0129 ` cO 5 021;, €c006 02 004 < v/s Ratio Perm 0.03 0.03 c0.09 c0.27 0.07 0.20 v(ct, }..., " . 0.45' 067 007 0.47 047 007 ` 047, .0 08p027 0 39' 0i Uniform Delay, dl 42.5 22.6 16.5 42.7 20.2 16.5 26.3 32.7 0.0 27.6 34.1 0.0 ProOresslo8 actor x.34 0 48 013 z1 33' 0 69 „ 0 48 .k f)0 1 00 t 0 _ 1 t1O j k I4 Incremental Delay, d2 0.8 1.0 0.0 1.0 0.2 0.0 0.7 0.4 0.4 0.6 0.7 0.3 Delay<(s 57.9. 1.1.9• 2 2 e 57.8 4 1 T 9 :27 0 33 1 , 0.4 2$2 X34 -( Level of Service ERA E B ACC ACC A Ap`praachhDelay(s) " "16:4 Approach LOS B C B B rtriltn:elfg -,e4atit HCM Average Control Delay 15.8 HCM Level of Service B HCMI,Volume to Capacity ratio 054 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 100.0 Sum of lost time (s) 8.0 Intersecfon Capacity Utilization 58.3% ICU Level of Service B> Analysis Period (min) 15 '' ._x! c Critical Lane Group • Ben Waldman 2030 AM Total_TC Mead Twon Center (LSC# 070010) Page 1 LSC, Inc. HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2030 AM Total TC 10: WCR 32 & CR 7 3/7/2007 + P 1, • Rat. ,1 1 to :: Lane Configurations 1� 4, 4, 4 +1, S rt l 0Rl�p�a g :4 sztF faw to . i `amf e ni, `�gt-m r Volume(vph) 10 75 41 23 43 44 48 107 27 62 187 10 Pea iour Factor , 0 g-aV-491 0 ,t 9 a '923 s 092 t�0'92 092 "€) 2' 0 92 st0 A.92 Hourly flow rate (vph) 11 82 45 �25 47 48 � 52 116�� 29 67 203 11 Volume Vo Total (vph) 137 120 198 282 pnmwy- i...)_ M�� ,ens It..�2e �.#`-- 7"aers:A f::.%' •x..,.'kptws r `,v...;'' ,'* �'` i`Y"-:f,.� s Volume Right(vph) 45 48 29 11 E �- A r g a :...'ar n.viimitiftwii...do t- Departure Headway(s) 5.1 5.2 5.0 4.9 De re`em Jt7izatidn, x €� a f w 0 38 , ti ,r « fi s . Capacity(veh/h)�y_ 629 y 624 678 693 Ge roJ D010114 �`.inn"v �..�9aM..�. .„ ai'1 3 ;it-E w`„.t3s- -'VWg.. i.'xW.. 4i »," ',,,xs , `'' Approach Delay(s) 9.4 9.2 9.8y}} 10.9 ra r S- _IR' z , _ g " '' 1 s",...�i s.* i!'s a axVxv.'.F.�. : r v . .f�TY34 iFs^ � ax�c..�T � �S Y a,' ' qi a r `i�„is '""ac �_^ _..,�m'•'.r.'. ;�. ixaa"s -"u.,w. ,.....� = _t._ __ ilr'�.Y��F�W₹c �++��R�� " i&'�.d �. Fh -mfi anp.�:.=mt� gi - gs:a47.4"_ky s .e+'t'a.; HCM Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 f .. ft rya w .z • Ben Waldman 2030 AM Total_TC Mead Twon Center(LSC# 070010) Page 2 LSC, Inc. HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2030 AM Total TC 12: Hunters Cove Rd & CR 7 3/7/2007 C 4 t P \ Lane Configurationss. 4 :::.1 $aWd'�3�.'-,".�� . u' "z l+ ee.'':o-4: �,3 '. -i � tee. ' '' ' -.-:' r i �v # xv e a. 0% ,. .Frei.W..•:A N_'' :- _,L '3 L1`,�3`'„`s"k ..:i ` ... 7 Grade 0% 0 0% Vb, lnegg1ir' '~, 2 t ;5 ` 'k7 ...: i . 5 T - $ 3 ? s',; N ,k Peak Hour�, _Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 " "kinetilitt St Pedestrians R _ a. xx Maitrittid l` '-.k. �sf�:7 ,e.-.* 4la,,. £°S.OV- tx _a ''a €�+�:�^x,4, .-. F� m'�...s��,'.G �o- 5.5�+ Walking Speed(ft/s) �x Pew rife `s N y �v Y i :'3 k,, r iSg arwr i y g Right turn flare(veh) Nte471- [IWIL; , 6'`1r3[g2H.+.fiti#hg:ff y s 24.:i Y�• 4',• }.`GN M . - `t+i }'"SR..Y�. Median storageveh) .__., �..,x r� r_._ n. .�n_.� .z � pX, platoon unblocked VCSral. W. n 472 194, k g n 5 r ,µw ' , + s OR t,a F i vC1, stage 1 conf vol ;W-t4_ ant!?y. I Q _=�Yy . ,$, '4'. '.'s ti,_i. 1i Yx :4 ` 9x.,'xN 8 Y a vCu, unblocked vol 472 194 197 tC 2 stage (s) t $ kp ttc `gym a a 3 ;_ ,s f 3 7 = y rt r , g{ .. p0 queue free% 95 99 ^ 100 cM 4rs6 Atttfi . fl . X47 n t37B i. .. , g } ,a AraailOrrinptA(cerg R? std' w._ Volume Left 27 0 5 + Volurrie'RjghCj r 5 CJ . ,~ r f cSH 582 1700 1376 Vkt ime t4gapat p t)&@0 12 ;r:0 00 .. _' :.;�1: k> Queue Length 95th (ft) 4 0 0 ` Controt tay is . :n4` 1.'t-,.5-. 0 Q. U .. . Lane LOS B A _ .. es kjEb..Delay_(s) f 11 &, 0 0 . = 0 2 Approach LOS B "'' ) Average Delay 0.9 Intersection Capacity",,tJttlrzet on 0>: . 27.0% ICU Level of Service A'' Analysis Period(min) 15 • Ben Waldman 2030 AM TotalTC Mead Twon Center(LSC#070010) Page 3 LSC, Inc. HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2030 AM Total TC 14: WCR 32 & Hunters Cove Rd 3/7/2007 l l ! ~ 1 t O `► 1 d Lane Configurations 4 4, 4, 4> ,s S.�9.�.. .., it ";; t'�_"�ie - '. }₹`- ". -Y its gfa',`k � iM�e .P ,7%:4p '"z- . ,SYO `'' ;.t; , p4y. Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% b1eW �'- r#x Tm ' :: a .₹s5.a ��... 5.. 5 �,f 05 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 092 0.92 092 0.92 092 092 092 092 ftbQ igt alke .J ` : £jam . 5. t ,.f 6 t 5 5 + t>' Pedestrians atl.'... �tfYa'e eiiT.�,.-::- r4E':m �.,.li' ti�`ro`,'C`;�,Zk Ph.ri ds�� ,c,' . `" ..k,''..}4+.; .., W ..^ 'Y,y, i zy tt,''�'_� Walking Speed (fUs)3 a_ SS-.-, 5tir.F Right turn flare (veh) �. "la T se {,Wsf A':.S ._P .tf ies_:;rr` -z_M eNt* :.r' a ...t.e*F*tc#2., Median storage veh) " i ati tt'ry -+ x € xt£a F. ,. j�.r,. w 'oR W -0vzdu t�-3'�'? ._ Ya, a.,-€:.. Y� .a ,-`m -4 �-Y3- -e r?� « 1.Y. w pX, platoon unblocked " " P ! fir € TttSV W Zi 3 ,"1`73 .. r ,1,14; :3tlt 470 311_ '306 ;-j 1 vC1, stage 1 conf vol gcstcr : gif, o'rf - '_'_ -" " 4 ..: :" ,4 L ', x 1 vCu unblocked vol 114 173 314 306 170 311 306 111 t(' smgt. } s # $ t r s t . ... .,. .,'Q i '... ..a: ,. a .:_7t 63 62': 71 . :.65 &.2 tC, 2 stage(s) tE niati a `��. ', .iiA0'r... 2 2" W 3 X 4,0 3 3 3'5 4 b 3:r3 ,. p0 queue free% 100 100 99 99 99 99 98 99 �p - 1L'1 y/^¢j 4U C�th� �3' y=:Y � �C{FCS� �'�Y,4. .4F��rn.;c -. 5 h✓ ' :: �'��' 2�R -�.�V� � � � .. ��4 � 629 ��,� �`4 J t =, i, cEe'E!�a`�ea5�z:1 3; � n. -� ,'i '! % a laisT°' .:,„s ti 57,1- , "' }"Y a` Na;s Volume Left 5 5 5 5 YOITn e htr - x . F g ale r04 r 5 y ., ,i .. 4, y, cSH 1475 1404 680 670 VptumeFtsiCapa ty. max,,,f''Ut ( 7 - .;. d 03 . . '`l._, . , , x Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 0 2 3 C0trg4 Iaf(W*Sr Uno.fl o c - f. '4Y `,1Q e Lane LOS `A -A, B . .� . .B Apoto-ko f isii(sj`.: }p. A 4,',:.W4 140 6, r,, kn ;. Approach LOS B B u . :31174. .°-a.k ..e....b..... tns...M. ti:.:xAs,n t.2.e1xsMERS...ISSs::' 'Zw.`w..:v.'&ea .w..i_,... Y.._ Average Delay 1.5 In1100.01,Pafrabily Utilizati_d_rt- t`r202%. . ICU Level of Service' A s Analysis Period (min) 15 • Ben Waldman 2030 AM TotalTC Mead Twon Center(LSC#070010) Page 4 LSC, Inc. HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2030 AM Total TC 18: SH 66 & RTO Access 3/7/2007 Lane Configurations ft let pr " T 0ntr{) .;»w' - u's"S'-rW'£ 'tE4N F-`tra r ,4N i` fi ri, ''�`4 AW Grade 0% 0% 0% Vo,u aetiltr sDVF: .YANiti.Sigh`r y � � ,f4.W Z I *. Peak Hour�y Factor p 0.92 0.92 µ 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 FYat ktearat� 171iN €' O t t i M as W 5 , . r r .try '5v p LCD . msm 4. ♦ .. 4 ✓ .nn n .i ni.a .'x iw 52b .�.M1'a. a N✓'F. u� ix v i-✓a .+.*!n :.. Pedestrians ₹ �{}y !kF{'Y- ,RS .R-a W H. �: x i `}vx..K'" }{ T - * a i t it?, i ,�','xti. niii."€txa _., -X I gr. r ,ii 7 #,t i^ � . ym xi ��n�S;� `wa?rts. ,sr%"�.a�...�a,..H,...'au:¢- ��wb"?�.E:.cr+;.. �ss2.n Walking Speed (Ws)I?ti ft Ratfr jN , ,Y '11 _i{ ev :.'t ri 14: 3"' :3 WY Right turn flare (veh) Median i storage veil) } (� tiliA.�riP.,&Yfil slgtiaA(fit/ ? a;:. t 4 . , �8,,: - ""' "'c�+$i ;`ye.: zx .t;Nregx r s pX, platoon unblocked 0.86 0.86 0.86 -V a W W � t F v.~ .,�i�p9A9�u�a ;956 .�-`>ws',�� 1 ��',.. �C�.i�x #��.�� t '�s��Q'°r'ii vC1, stage 1 conf vol 4 __- a 14: a 'r,,,.r a g vCu, unblocked vol 836 1734 234 §4'TY" . ..5:.�°`'.'�a ..R:,+' g .L a"a M E 3 :`:' s-. °i}° ,P'.'n'Sr`�`k. -."".-! tC, 2 stage (s) t $ ,TEPS# €k�' ,.,q t r\; yas .p'�*r"y'.� 4yw ..,v '�*a '~ ,s', . * ..., il kl w7Y 41j � xs _ p0 queue free% 100 , 100 95 _ k C"i+"�a4&+IfiL6`•`l r4V��v ��5� . �s.a ��',��k � � ��.e v -hiiyyys r Y4g(tRxono„q�•,m-•,•^ '€' i3.. O R�9 soi,„ ,,�Z �*+ks w,f?_;fix'' "`r y " .,, a 3 &4` - Volume Left 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sra:U eFtight F csA 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 663 Votume tb Capacity 0`48 k 48 ;D 8 ' tia28 f 0 D 00 . .. 3: '' r !"4-f Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 4 CQntr3t„Delay=�s) x;'`_ Q 0 P:0 GO pO: ,AQ„ f10 Lane LOS g Approach.Aelay(s) =; 0:0 Approach LOS B Average Delay 0.1 Intersection Capacity Utilization 45 0% . ICI!_ Level o Service As _'`r Analysis Period (min) 15 • Ben Waldman 2030 AM Total_TC Mead Twon Center (LSC#070010) Page 5 LSC, Inc. HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2030 AM Total TC 20: SH 66 & FMA 3/7/2007 9 Lane Configurations Vi ft ft r r IdealF (phpl .`w„� „190 , 1900` 1900,x..1900 F0 9 W` _ .= y.. .a -"ate��.. Total l Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lan) Utaf FactorW:.0;9 0;95 ,095v 100 ". 09 .Z', 00 mtt ' e i , �a Frt 1.00- 1.00 1 00 0.85 1.00 0.85 Plt rotdcte y=f t09 ` 90," 100, w 00* 095 10t k,r t £,,. . .sh.4 s Satd. Flow(prat) 3433 3539 3539 1583 3433 1583 Ft et ` i. 0 24� 1 5 0 ' a A 95''x" =^ "h '�,} 1k s .fie .-.s.. a,c?'#..xt -:t �� r�r,�`=' a 's5'rTi w-. c'?�. m�:wf:.d'i� �e .t•.bzi+�T�.. Satd. Flow(perm) 856 3539 3539 1583 3433 1583 Vb me,(v h) ki 348 1158; `'aV6. ,. 4 g 1.6' 1 a..E trazirrx ' Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Ad F vph) hx5„378 2259 822 LL257. 1158 175gra ` RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 51 0 49 LatleGG 'p Flo t.(vph -a 378x,1259` $22 ._..205 O 8 R.. 12` a' liZ 5 a - i 1 Turn Type 3 pm+pt pm+ov pm+ov Protects'+ ases _ 3 Permitted Phases 4 8 6 Actuated Effective Green, g (s) 62.5 62.5 48.8 78.3 29.5 39.2 Ac ted 9JC Ratio ;, 002"i,0.62 Y 0.49'= 078 R t l0.3 # , .. ` €1 -: £ m ..ii . Clearance Time(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 x ,�... r: : , e lcle=F�tt ,stdEt�(s �. • • Lane Grp Cap (vph), 785 2212 1727 1303 1013 684 v/s "atio tot .. . U 0-23' 0.05 t o v/s Ratio Perm 0.25 0.08 0.06 vlcRahsrr'n� R"; q_048•' 007 r4t 016 ':016M iff rlNs -$ ' V 'tax Uniform Delay, dl 9.8 10.9 17.1 2.7 26.0 19.9 Progression Factor 1':70, ,1 29 1 00 1.00 1 0 ` 00k ₹" ATM', " "-`, , „ h ,1 � .. � :& ., n . ..,_., . ,_A Incremental Delay, d2 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 r 0.3 0.1 Level of Service BBB ACC Approac rt3elay(s) 15,,0 13 8 23.1' , x k . ', " , Approach LOS B B C '' HCM Average Control Delay 15.5 HCM Level of Service B HCMeValuume to Capacity,ratio'' 0.45 of r Actuated Cycle Length (s) 100.0 Sum of lost time (s) 8:0 Fz Intersection Capacity Utilization 450% , •ICU Level,of Service Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group " - • Ben Waldman 2030 AM Total_TC Mead Twon Center(LSC#070010) Page 6 LSC, Inc. HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2030 AM Total TC 22: Road B & CR 7 3/7/2007 't'l'^V1 1 t l.y ..:rs'.. t 4a.e1E 3'9 'i y ₹/ 't l.. .i i -1 d '.Y� ' Lane Configurations 4 Sl itro.tr „ tg a , gtpp u" - 3` 'r` a AOA„ so-n ,,: SE Grade is _ x. F 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 IPtbraiiilh , x, g $i `1 +, ""SialIWaiagalreaggia Peak Hour Factor 0.1/2 6.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92' 0.92 0.92 0.92 NI ift idiirt e tv try ,- 23 .` t. ` '_ "23i _ allb a 't �` Pedestrians CWa x44144.r'.,`lking Speed (ft/s) ePA Y ' saw' M'" :`I NA '5O 7 :._ ` - Oka ' s 7 's`"aWN i,��r x", ,- �Ryight turn flare (veh) -� iMY MMediatitre w`t A... Ck t d�t h a a� F�E�r, IS '- 's,=S$.�.. .,u �h!I"-, ^'-# edian storage veh){� cJs SR r)2t` .:t/`' ,.SS E.+. ., r�re"'�r^t '�i ta� § 6 n:;.s ₹ " '� ,ti ts: : ,. ;.,ac,:+ ra s . ..m xb.,+ x d'a�.�„Di. lm.,m .3'r ;' "' ..4�",'w:-�"'...� pX, platoon unblocked v .'jg�-nfi) 0 ¶.otaim 54 E§" 3' .. 1 T"' t .p a 3.a.:'-- .r.*- 11, stage go..:_v X . 6, 3'4'3' y g2 #323 s �Et a � , vC1, stage 1 conf vol ,�,�� Vty..2',J!g: .C6nf VC)t ." .t...... t ' -� .�%". j'.s-t F``" dt ':;j ,P-. .?N gx ;1'l t ' vCu, unblocked vol 546 533 319 568 524 162 323 1 55y, 175 tC, 2 stage (s) il..,A 7 x ... -�- t t, a tF fr��, �... t`�,f��,�Q.� mx"�n ,5r�f);x��,4�.;'�22� ,r ��' ��} � _�,��v ��aa.�� T p0 queue free% 95 97 94 82 99 97 99 99 cM,gapaeity�'cvelf/)' a2s . la .;r' st ' aaz ►,21 N a n tiriallfi Vol pta,""�. ' �' 7 � �# ac as nO �e Left Y_ ._. � r��. S^ '9MS X52 s %s,y �F! "S.+1SY�av k ' Volume Left 23 70 11 9 Volurge Right ;. 4Ot, 3!tta & ri wa r . t , ' I,}A qtr' : a - cSH 547 456 1237 1401 d ' ` ' ' Volumijo Capacity' D 14°. 6z4., 6ro4 # ti:A'(° ". t y 3 .° . Queue Length 95th (ft) 12 20 1 0 Contropelay(s)" Lane LOS BC A A Approach Delay(sj Approach LOS B C77; L " � '-n I -rat Average Delay 3.8 lntersection.CapacityUtilization 35-7%a ictJ Le'v'el Of Service A: k r Analysis Period (min) 15 • Ben Waldman 2030 AM TotalTC Mead Twon Center(LSC# 070010) Page 7 LSC, Inc. HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2030 AM Total TC 24: Road A & CR 7 3/7/22007 f ~ t4\ t P ► r } Lane Configurations j, A 1 t P '5 t P Sigf Control._e' .-� k.'�n?" ` S1*Stop. :2 . . k.,'�aStopA'-`z' l"4�'-�vy A4 Freed 3" •.mot. .t„ i s «. _ a�'zs-_ r..., �s_.s.9_�. ..at.. ��s F � `�°w�'5'a�"C��» ari Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% 'Lolume;(veh/h) ,-",;.r;t,,,14 . ...-16"..< 52. . `= 7T kAct. "I 7. ,.2 1' ' .8 t:t?. e Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0 92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 H#ourly f ow rate(vph t 154 =17 '` 57� 84 4 18 26,. . 15 9 '2 Pedestrians S.1�SY�R y(V.. .i+„ C! .�•i.• 1'..E fi :a.S₹.'; . _. '_ 3 .ys{.rR � J �h a..'Y� � J`e �.{I. :"Y � rz.t's-.3#"��)a s`.�=Y Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent„tlac a u " Right turn flare (veh) aYak:t .Y,id»'��..'?'ka � �„R.,�,x�3s A-.NQne.v E, kj s:. pan One_K.�.. .._,ae"� -',`s , ...tZa' •:',' �. .__ .,_:`C.:=1 = 61); • .. Median storage veh) 1psfrearrrsignal ft ' _ 844 r f f pX, platoon unblocked vt conflictir'g3rolume "._67},_ z;7.27 .385 697 651 153 404 ' 249 ' {Y � }':x vC1, stage 1 conf vol VC' stag 2 conf VOt '� c :.( ak • ms vCu, unblocked vol 671 727 385 697 651 153 404 249 tC, stage (s)2 p0 queue free % 95 95 91 72 89 98 98 98 • cM apacity(vehlh) 322 t 337 663 `304 373 893 154 _ 1.4O.S4,14, "fie @ 1iT!" #-1�"v ''" ., ":.y ri .3„So jt e'. d5 :r k ,�.d-».�mznz��wc�,a� �s ��,�..�� '�.��", -t3.� 34 �' a��'� �, t � �,s}.s..: .... Volgm otal 1 74 ,; �84` 60 26 ° ' 153 6 2 � 85 r 2i + E Volume Left 15 0 84 0 26 0 0 21 0 0 Volrtme Righht. 0 57 4 +::`18 0 cSH 322 540 304 455 1154 1700 1700 1317 1700 1700 Volumeta apactty ,.0.05 -. 0.14=: 0.28 Queue Length 95th (ft) 4 12 27 11 2 0 0 1 0 0 Control Delay,(s) :'•16.7'•,• 12.7 21,3 :.14.1` 8.2' 0.0 d 0 ^":7 8 `0:0 0.0 Lane LOS CBCB A A Approach Delay(s), 13.4`" 18.3 0.8 " i Approach LOS B C 7 Ci- .._ 77 `- Average Delay 4.5 Intersection Capacity Utilization " 37.5% ICU Level of Service. A Analysis Period (min) 15 • Ben Waldman 2030 AM Total_TC Mead Twon Center (LSC#070010) Page 8 LSC, Inc. HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2030 AM Total TC 25: Road C & CR 7 3/7/2007 C t 4\ t ti t Lane Configurations 4 4) 4. 4„ AI htt i E '`A T e.t j ` i ; "tSto r,* ,�`> , ,Pt tr�-�^ � t , app „-, ;ru.s �^F'T* �:S 00/`'".:HZ ,- '�r.'.' ,rvu >ao-0% s^` .O'��is., s�=4` *€` k x`", r��''ta.�. ��(� {1„Grade ( ;�, � a;'�*. �,ry 'Xt' g � g 0/0 §g, 0/o eThi t� '& �-7 • f. f £ bilk• i` a+�s Sark pa`-f ,: R2 titi_ 5. Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0 92 0 92 0.92 0 92 0 92 0 92 0 92 0 92 0 92 09220 92 R g n`4 � - >��.��5a.= t�;��;� �. 0,��-.. �=t(�� , 8�kz � 3° t, �,�„4s �a �"' g9 ��t Pedestrians ^ fmwrj. ' �' " :sh rcrcYY'��i"'° t;_ `�` "36.,R d * c ,°"s f iwb-.3... w r tir , 5>tia.£ s -: -ec- y z,. z aN'�s"°^'�-f^" .iw :+arm f ''bW.. �'x az..ffsx ,�'3•✓:.=,.+. `s'4"vs`5. r�S1, §�.w Walking Speed(Ws) ^ !WIC} 1 x 'k�.`'.2.�..`.y � , 'F^;m-*'" �a'�{. swig. aK ry'.,s�: 4:" .i si' asr a°r" ' L#�+'X +'L . II�pE�S3'� ^�,.-xu'��„-aR$' m"s. �'>Y .�+.-.L; .P.th »�'>}....'.fi i..,.y..rr.. ."Y a �'�•i2§Z dK„ .�`.�X' �X.._.•,.. Right turn flare(veh) 'Y..�:` dianstor .k ' .. Rr aa-a' '".5:6 , hhtenEx.�. ..aa,glr t "*.-. .writ+ffU:'I.N 3?1 WO Median storageveh) gs Yue,�r ii'a a h : ^{ Sxa4.- t' th`'V .: . , xa: „ r 'u, � {>}.ai' i� ' pX, platoon unblocked """��' �` '' �' ��`� 4 -�� ->` �a 5. , ow 1901 ' t�3` u s .. lit F `r m vC1, stage 1 conf vol " uG2stale - .` :� -i vCu unblocked vol 501 497 293 503 494 190 293 193 tC, 2 stage(s) t, . ;e az'"-�` .z� `� 4S- — :tcr`�u, .'3z:''FaiN 3lAFAM. a:-3,3��'' , '2r> `,:_v.M INK42 s.�rt ,�' .�' „ •'t • p0 queue free % 99 100 99 94 100 99 100 100 o f �... .. =M'.'" ri.as�� .c��r�r�. � -.�."�ra,.�$�'��z'��47,��rs�'�"�i"wVJ2lV�52V$3F,flS".w� nq��n'�i g�'��y-:+-: .t o RCS a x'�i��•L�.�'...SxF'.' Volume Left 3 30 3 2 AV- W5:0AMW4:1 ::;;;W.7';FfqN '`tr? cSH 653 517 1268 1380lolw1} g1tu _` O;d OsflO O tlt7 r Queue Length 95th (ft) 2 6 0 _��p C�4ilrsi Zak 1 D 5" 62 r � ` , n. Lane LOS BB A a A Ap 0aPe1ay t IF 10; 3 s ,Zer: „ .Us 1 Approach LOS B B 1 Average Delay 1.2 Intemee� elti.:capac ty Ut liatiO_ _ 27 2ofo ICU Level of Service Analysis Period (min) 15 , • Ben Waldman 2030 AM Total TC Mead Twon Center(LSC#070010) Page 9 LSC, Inc. HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2030 AM Total TC 26: WCR 32 & Road B ` 3/7/2007 • �.{♦ f 4— `f\ Lane Configurations _ 4 V Sign b 10: ,�r ` tfe 7 rte e bi r 4ITS, l ,g 02 Grade 0% 0% 0% Rfh .. r�� s:M,ai- .:.Cgla..,nvav-..... aEa s .92 0.92 >3..�. ,� s..r:"._..6�. `�S,u J'�'e�""_,.x ^k.,£ Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0 H 'i. �ggy E5tt" # fT 47gat.OTM .cFhX'.ri e271, .n6 TSS?i', a3 a-,'d+.:.A. .riL_:,W'.3a{t..il Pedestrians ,1 { rw xtx rs aict S ;3" ..,€a„ t,�,..s x .�tf° •"�` � s kk €'.s^e"i+,'"a�""k ' .mss-�K ��, "�, g h -''-'�- w-z <:x�: *?'y,.: .s...�:;n_.. C a W,"�aSi Walking Speed(f/s) EfTril^�.�' ax�d`"PiW 'hn, W �. ' "`'j'�, Right turn,{fl�are(veh) tita rill, s...`. � S-.r�.. liWa§.`_` '. ' '9s k'{'..EP's x 144Sib Median storage veh) Mf�vai Wes^ ,`.t-. '.Ma" x`�y-t',�f r i 'gt`.:ref4 ''• ."w "'...n ._€`3 xz -iV fiJ�+} 5 iee t.4�Y.. +1`�..... Gw-. .5=5�v f₹--xe ... +F4.�....rathle m.e�- pX, platoon unblocked flgam` t frattllitetWalt_sue,}1 = n 4 ° vC1, stage 1 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 178 237 117 t�$�,�`�I,��e��'�"k•� .�t '� .� .. ...� t �i a ,8�1 �2z3_�' � i..-�. x e a- ar.' .F tC,� 2 stage(s) j�Ci� } y N} fl >. i'�a ' "E 2?-ie{& ₹+A§e';11 STA 3, £M h k v l f S ., .6 k .: 'w .�3 .R.,'Ekn �d.... 2aa -p0• queue free% 98 _ 92 98 Oit ..N-� F'rt ':c.. e�"rt-.cl MAl•. � ��nTs '.i,n i 1agnit�.�n¢. tyF _,f:+ .. l� F- 'l igt4.... i" L`^{.`C' ,fa ^^ Volume Left 0 28 57 ifo rr e l lght ,:- 12 4 Qx u° 3 ._m f cSH 1700 1398 779 Valli teTt©CaM u 0=10 002,;'- d 1E - , r, ;4 Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 2 8 Lane LOS A B Approach ( ela ° s}} :AA Approach LOS B ..'yam a -sS4^ -3 S :t e "3 ;.:�,5• +„f- :4;� x j< p .. .- � 'Y,?+�spas^,! !;: � ,.. -' -'-: ._a-+ _�.�,., ..�-.ra ,�.:w�cY w sue.-a;,.a .:..�_.....E._.a....z3�:a'p'� � m.:.....:estr:ts..b.:�.€zv�,.,... uct.:i::m��,�.,�E:t'._ .._ ,. ..-: Average Delay 2.9 In rsctior1H CapacityUtilization ' 28 1%T ICU €evel of Service A'-' Zint Analysis Period(min) 15 • Ben Waldman 2030 AM Total_TC Mead Twon Center(LSC#070010) Page 10 LSC, Inc. • HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2030 PM Total TC 4: SH 66 & CR 7 3/7/2007 t 4\ t `► 1 d Lane Configurations 1515 4i r ) ) 44 it r 15 4 r Ideal Flow(vp?p 1900 _ G 9O „ 190 ` . F.R ggfilKWICIP. , w E r o Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Utul actor 0 9 ® 11100 k. .. r_, PP FFrt p 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.'00 1.00 ,,'00..85 fit Prot cte ..Sty'.,- it �95 �i - a +.�.t r.- , kia? ' s . t_ .1 rf ,A oo Satd. Flow(prot) 3433 3539 1583 3433 3539 1583 1770 1863 1583 1770 1863 1583 F ' r ed ." •b Satd. Flow(perm) 3433 3539 1583 3433 3539 1583 1340 1863 1583 1231 1863 1583 . 5 :Z.': '-y ""g:„. X34 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 y�' 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 ME per:' _ ' .9 2 2 31 � 1 ,. 4 99 ,& 74A 9 _ RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 171 0 0 211 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lai?' riujFlovct(vp 846': ` • oV T 4 2 1 s "MS.- flteMeat4-791 Turn Type} # Prot Perm Prot o- Perm pm+ptt Free pm+pt Free Protected Phasesr sh.�<"_ate .`k 4� Sin f 8 tSf a 1 4 fYt_�`,'`w..t•i. Permitted Phases 4 8 2 Free 6 Free Actuated Green, G(a x171 'y 8c ' , 7 4"' - 38 9 l389'Nt2Piar ' 294 oo o Effective Green, g (s) 17.1 38.6 38.6 17.4 38.9 38.9 26.6 16.0 100.0 29.4 17.4 100.0 dituatei g/ „,R uo 0-17 0 39'0 3`-fir` 017 x0r39 . #039 02' 1 0G 0 29 s 0mof a Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 q y GrvArif(T Z` ' a3 • 1 n. -�. : .. at1. '' Y c{..: YnX�D.y�S)��'�a,y:3f�� #�6'�4-.;U,{FIS'#'�', � v'�t' � Lane Grp Cap(vph) 587 1366 611 597 1377 616 402 298 1583 427 324 1583 a v/s tto P t .g 01 . F`» ° �c014 'c0 3 xV v/s Ratio Perm 0.0 t 0.09 0.08 0.22 c0.16 c0.24 vfc Rat14s:�`,A e "_ , 5001%` '70.E r .._18 0 82� , 0 gilig a0 5 1s ; a`�+z22:- , 'e�. .a' a-024 Uniform Delay, d1 39.8 25.9 20.2 39.8 30.1 20.4 30.4 36.4 0.0 33.3 35.2 0.0 Progression-Factor _` r1.38 . 0@6 00 1`06 093'_; 190 X1 00 1 0c;w0 00 19 4)0 Incremental Delay, d2 5.7 1.3 0.1 5.6 13.3 0.1 1.0 1.5 0.3 26.5 1.2 0.4 59°8 u.3 ` ., 0<4 Level of Service EBBUDDCD A ED A Approach Approach LOS C D .•B C HCM Average Control Delay 33.4 HCM Level of Service C HCMtVolume to Capacity ratio_ 3 f. :;0Itt .. r i x. Actuated Cycle Length (s) 100.0 Sum of lost time(s) 8.0 Intersection Capac ty Uhhzation 83 3°!° ICU Level'of Service EEC dm Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group, _ • Ben Waldman 2030 PM Total_TC Mead Twon Center (LSC#070010) Page 1 LSC, Inc. HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2030 PM Total TC 10: WCR 32 & CR 7 3/7/22007 • --. i- '-' k t r •"- 19.-�, .�.r.,.�a..�> u`..e ' . .,, , 3aaxft: A.14.8± ti'� r*a pp(a ''`" 37..x.S h...�V_E _..^.:4;i* Lane Configurations 4, 4, 4, Sig! `sot . t- +_g,1.3 Step. F W tat __ . Volume(vph) 10 68 76 32 92 73 68 207 35 48 167 10 Peat . F,r„ or 0 92 ,0 92t,; 92- 9 , ... 9 Hourly flow rate(vph) 11 74 83 35 100 79 74 225 38 52 182 11 aTM, `1...1 X131 4`_w fir , .'',•. c2Y1' k ;NrA�,.', �,'t. ,.'� . '„`. Volume Total(vph) 167 214 337 245 VoIGBf _,r t F:, r � YaT^" Y� SraY Fx` tiq •* ffi 2a Volume Right(vph)_ 83 79 38 11 ord {{ _ Departure Headway(s) 5.7 5.7 5.5 5.6 4egre _ r o s,ru027 , 034_ j 038 * trawg' CCapaciittyy(veh/h) 553 565 616 588 C,ifor Delay s)t' ,r ' 10 8 fit 6'ms ,IE a f`'' ° .''l' r.~ett—gg t.,_,,:,:N.`_4k`:a • zJ Approach Delay(s) 10.8 11.6 14.0 12.1 �x s r > d,. S..�b L 5Yy . A aT'w`r'- z :x r r': '?�"ds sry�i2 F''P• c Atff�.-i 4i�G,�I ,OSyr-., .^�� ,�B B^.-." �.ti$-��.«-,.> w:a�ns, ri�.,su�gr.� .v."'r.��^t :, Ora.'yS ..... xt ��` k f ecb"`i ' SS '`_` u� # .w '. . 3 " 4 iJ'**374 HCM Level of Service B Intersection C"apa'citty Utilization ` x::49 4% st tegoffatof Service s A , 2%.-Fazysixtz Analysis Period(min) 15 .., r4r . . , a • Ben Waldman 2030 PM Total_TC Mead Twon Center (LSC#070010) Page 2 LSC, Inc. HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2030 PM Total TC 12: Hunters Cove Rd & CR 7 3/7/22007 • .t&�.i ha Rix:, _ 'aT 4t YZ�Kv � �9Y tV... T- - . . Lane Configurations fr � t Gade4 _35 .. h0 � t. 0�3p. '... mkx Ee # ,mar �a ��yy 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hn r�ot� rat(t$t 5r t>, , 2 S fr F I M 'AE :, ': Pedestrians �� OllteligfitteatelaVitA a I h f" ll x; �"`w i i x as is +.,s,t .. .rx ,�r�. i:+5Sa'RgY- i w m ,;" rns wm.�;�_,t 7.- .-R.i. Walking Speed`�(fVs) �• t52 riW1543F iz:r ES3 2a3` f- "k 'kfi'-+a. 7 . ;.rrt " .5T" WT 't'Le s $,�"+^ � ' 's, ' �t rn d! -, ,. .,.ate «..+,x,__.. .,. . . ,..-� firs `'..s ..., B uz =£mt +C " .y.} ₹ �' '3 Right turn flare(veh) Median storage veh) "y _ - UPii �`srgti tCt � �3 " rtx;a ,.:,+ te, G.. ;E.:"` .. 5 .'. .r.4�;'., niZet¢ ntiltA Ft fte A a n pX, platoon unblocked Vt:'r,�'©n t 11gm r17lr*R .BS3 t 3M'i x' �' 5.q 4 4 'F'��_;* x �y",.s:.s. 1'�::: t} t a xF. vC1, stage 1 conf vol _ - vC2;Sf3get21'C infka °@ _.:w S'' `-s a" ' vCu, unblocked vol 653 348 359 tC, 2 stage (s) t-Fd., Y iti a.e, e .cam a.O- X'k R , .C' 2:. >"e_+S s�.: "--+S ew..s•_r kx- <+�4 c5 p0 queue tree % 97 99 :; 100 clgf'ca'ocltyoeh7srimt4-gtn9x s 12t10o m q a n tisa YfirtiM". <..S 'v raPA M:4t10 115Wrac�:": 'a yMMC,:_,,,J � e Volume Left 11 0 5 VolumeRi5h1 5_ 22 0 cSH v �493 1700 1200 VoJume to Capacity '003: 421, , 0 00 <`. :.•` Queue Length 95th (ft) 3 0 0 Confrq(ggtays)., t2:6 00 " 02 Lane LOS B A Approaatt,`Delay(s'}` 12 6 0.0, 4:2 w.= , ; f Approach LOS g tt et .., Average Delay 0.4 Intersection Capacity Utilization__ . 28,.3% ' ICU Lever of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 • Ben Waldman 2030 PM TotalTC Mead Twon Center(LSC#070010) Page 3 LSC, Inc. HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2030 PM Total_TC 14: WCR 32 & Hunters Cove Rd 3/7/22007 Lane Configurations 4, r [ 4' 4, 4, Si do ,1 sP.€5 . x. titatetai._ l S 'a st(xp T tO.�� t- ; Grade y gg� 0% 0p% 0% 0% —T:Iggf$47,4:fattligalfgattia Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 *0.92 0.92- 0.92 0.92 '0.92- '0.92 0.92 0.92 '0.92 0.92 ktr5 k 'Wit is£= fi r VVI 5 P r , :. at 1 �1 _�� , , (Peydestrian�s? �F §� �Y R +�. •/ . �'y'�^, �h4✓a ., S £ F. } T3 .'+s au.� ,h*'j .v'*.{. e, s-.. l:,.:t Walking Speed (ft/s) z*'₹r s i.,. . ' Pt• 7 '1"xF'�d �lfel ` Mia, �e, h)._ .�.. _ .s..��. u„z. �.�.. ... ,.. .�.. H ,*:.,x:.. Right turn flare (veh) tr`�°.�.a�'�"_3 ,_.•:tai., t,t$' � 2kV } %� �:`��k�'aE�t�tflrJe'≥ �� Median storage veh) � 6 xlalag4 d .: k M*. .. .,.... V e :Stq x a.wx^`ua,r"X.i 3. ' .#".i^'-. _ 'a 'vv u ITSTJ pX, platoon unblocked vt t� R Y 200 ,;k x1 R i 4 ,,._;$99 a 3B 55 1 ` `t 6 3 c vC1, stage 1 conf vol : raa.r.,s.m n.- s. x ;aa "il ,'a ` ie View v/C'�-u,`unblocked vol 209 158 393 385 155 391 385 L 206 SkI G4.'�l. 4 ui:.'Vt.s l 4l r- 5*' a4 Y.Av F +k" ^'ci -[ 4f$;' 4F gi #-�. -„E;.. _ .� .. v,. , # .. "_... x�°�":,. �sn�^.€j-. c,.;�7� # y-0...u:5 ��n ..aa'�,�:..� � a._,..,.:.- tC,2 stage (s) tg: " .t £'z as f t 2=2 A. . t. Ngni g +mod 13 3-a?+s t i u ' s -va a .. � -.�-d''tf? ,"�� iaQ�3'�'�, • p0 queue free% 100 100 99 99 99 99 98 99 ' xste /h)= ig 4 ,._. ,,. 142EF t a 55 g44 te$,9 , 57t:f4k (35 a + " 1 1 "z a Volume Left 5 5 5 5 W9i !g. _ ., 5 = T 5 6E : _5 ° t . ... t' r :. '. cSH 1362 1422 628 600 Vtl rt i ap c Y-x rt.00 -- aoo 003 a04,,.... ..;, t , : Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 0 2 3 ` ` " `�" C4tfJ to �s1 << Q.3, 0:2 :: fl 9 11-2v Lane LOS A ABB Approach LOS B B Average Delay 1.2 ►nCersectioriCapacify Utilization ° _ ',;22'.2W;4 lCl)tevehof Service A= Analysis Period (min) 15 • Ben Waldman 2030 PM TotalTC Mead Twon Center (LSC#070010) Page 4 LSC, Inc. HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2030 PM Total TC 18: SH 66 & RTO Access 3/7/2007 • 4%. \*. Lane Configurations ?'ft ++ r r !tl9'kttilli4 q � farf .ta-g e atil SA 4iRVJ' < T.:. y h°' nalM ,• Grade 0% 0% 0% ti'oluth e _ g , _ El , �BZ tx�` '.3 <U 220 .. ..... ... . t- t` . t�. Peak Hour Factor 0.92- 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 a rnfrOCAta . ,4,n ill „ .li u M =',g39Mt .,_ fiat ti g" p a Pedestrians �y M„„yppycc."��yyyyyyyy��.��t 4 Sfrr��{{� � kl =:a..�a'�Tn%v.af['nL��.Po�.^�,�o- Walking Speed (f/s) Right turn flare(veh) y a °°t lai " y u - C " NOt?M tCy h i a t a s aye' i"�Fr- Mediiian storage veh) gy �{ U e:F `$If f�dl(let i,�« Ai' `ss« .,us-4x ,t k $U©n_y.,r£,t "a-:. H'.a"ta, pX, platoon unblocked 0.58 0.58 0.58 t x �,. �� "� , `��. r`�-�_4 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 2181 3383 215 t 1[1 F mss-"" 2'- 9 :'(•r do :5 4 4 6 8- {6 9 �' ` �`3 .�. i_°, �' ., P�" `�'- tC, 2 stage(s) u g S .. '.'{ +' 95- 'Yt `y('EYS Ltd. fc ? }Yv 5. ",Y 3b 4 i l t ;`�. � x.��n.r.� �2 , >.�'vs�j:.,'fry;,, ��5`-� ,�3 ,, �.. `� � � ¢�'��"�.'._,... p0 queue free % 100 100 47 • , Ala �L �slr `5.rSIM i1 TNI t IOZP P.7 R'i tsR x ,s.' Volume Left 0 0 0 0 0 0 Vcl₹irf% igh} 0x x Oe t. ;0 1t32 239; x .`.. '.. cSH 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 455 Volum1a l:10.4 y 4- = b 59k 0 50 k 0 57 0:57 ' O1=01 0-53. Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 75 Conntrot ieTa "(sBr r 0.0 r O 0 too ..`0 O _ "t).0 X1:3 Lane LOS Approaak;DglaX(gRs` .xO-:0' 11,11, '.U 0, Approach LOS C Average Delay 1.3 Intersection'CapacityUtilization $9 7%x icct Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 •Ben Waldman 2030 PM Total_TC Mead Twon Center(LSC# 070010) Page 5 LSC, Inc. HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2030 PM Total TC 20: SH 66 & FMA 3/7/2007 pL�ane Configurations '►t ft ft r vi r V aigiphpI)3 tada0 6.9 A ro 0 991"StEW Total Lost time(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4. cs. Land UhF Facto i 00 ds ° #.NT, Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 Satd. �Flow}�Q(prot) 3433�* 3539 3539 1583 3433_ 1583 FltPQrw•'t s ;, s #�> 0 5 9,te_. '9f8"c�'' Ili It 9,' 4 Y 9^'w. - s w .�i ,� s`ri' �, .� 1` c.r; .-fr �" .�- .. � _Y,�'�±Y,t r rb � <: .a�s # 'k%�ti+.-,s"�*„`Ys� a��J€N,";E�' Satd. Flow(�gperm) 277 3539 3539 11583 3433 1583 V ^u"S �t gifts; �1.. �` �1Li '.�-rs°I a c.S�o ; tg'99"'3 l 5 -r l , '• t ; .r�� ₹ om+ lc e3^.zr Peak-hour % factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 to v.P, n �' `5p a Wit. r e an RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 11 0 8 Ea ,„ywEre'yPtt��._,_" . ' ti w 2k�� 2 � � c.cain t;I _ r ' TTurn Type L.- m pm+pt pm+ov pm+ov Pr cd hlas s+fft`r .. xi Permitted Phases 4 8 6 Actuatedf'er G(s,1,n 6.1 15 ' :ta . 9 m zt_ ; itiz ' r ¢ . po ?_ Effective Ert Green,@g (s) 69.1 69.1 48.2 71.1 22.9 39.8 Ac, t g//C tio a s0r6`,' 46 0,7 %gat 4p 'f' sa E "M1',^::R ` '2M g'u:,; Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 %title®_ e0,srz#tr(s) ,r te nwstaisale' Lane Grp OCap . (vph) 725 2445 17066 1189 786 693 v/s Ratio Perm 0.40 0.14 0 20 vfc Ra ai x "A.- :, 075-".s 0, . �`,. .-`a x?c .. .. Uniform Delay, d1 28.5 7.1 24.2 5.1 35.3 25.8 Progression F ctor r'1 6' 07 r �eitx00P4 0.. 'i`_ , i i+T . ,;_;} k:!, -e x 5 t,.,,. Incremental Delay, d2 3.6 0.1 8.9 0.1 4.9 4.4 Dela9,414 , maMlgait x� 5 k40m2;.‘ 30.3 ' . . ,.4;4A.._,.,x' , . F :ei:.4.1.₹ .. Level of Service D AC A DC Approach Detay(s 0 1 s2 ( 353 3 Approach LOS C C D HCM Average Control Delay 26.9 HCM Level of Service C HCM Volume Actuated Cycle Length (s) 100.0 Sum of lost time (s) 8.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 78 8°f ICU"Le'gI of Service :D' Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group - • Ben Waldman 2030 PM Total TC Mead Twon Center (LSC# 070010) Page 6 LSC, Inc. HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2030 PM Total TC 22: Road B & CR 7 3/7/2007 IIII ( ��- -may c 4 k. 4\ t 1 1 �A.l. a , { _.1 e ,..L ^'10.`1 :;'19 1 ,x�`V 9 � % c(iY�.;, \ 1i i C) RA'? i k;:-.-:- .7.14.i.•,1,,,.•,1 ''41T Eitti1 Lane Configurations 4) 4. 4. a5"I IY4Ci�trflt r"c¢ tOp�k'-'�'' �-...:'x 'F '- ifififis '- s .� �• m 9 p � �E4 K ,rli Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% g6ti III tetthjV - ter; 3 k .: 8• ' 'gglif tee? +: 1.a . " 0 l a6` Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 u.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.9z 0.92 H_ot3rlf *rateiuEbl- 14 f s F -Z4 v x'68 St -„—OV " ''_ `"l,3 ai`� Pedestrians / µ " .x, �8AWItla,�ilrv'sv,%i_✓�ik-i 21 -ta ry*.� li K yf. t d ,sk, -E 'a:.^ c"i 'K.. 4.'•# .._v T A`;".�J.��G�Y'....¢-0!lld..9�k t.S'��."-UY,.�a{ FS4's'.Y��. Walkinn^gg Sppeee5d, (ft/s) ss33 F.rt. 414 aXc. .?:4e ."o k9. ' :_.f FT .X.Px i .'# M �'?Fl�9 Ia' u+u�[y ,�Y.e,-.,.' .� f_. .Kk.x h5... �++ �. 9s�'x..n v_ _ Ylv x.. .. §.....i't%$�`�h. '"'3-YX,k« t. •^a ,S.a '. Right turn flare px (veh) MMl '&`+.''' ft0ne�'•x r$-, rlatit Uftl x? " r , y} :." e .era .._„,.k'�z''3h .-,...�.�`r �.�c��.y�kk3 �i3feT�..�'��'�-.�s..c.WM"' S�:.a'-; Median storage veh) Up' treesr. at i' t _ i '.".' = 1te 3 .. tnregr f pX, platoon unblocked vC c i cti7lgvgtii fi " .. 8 8 . n 876 268 8"„k,` ,O1?:, - . fs � '� `4s,`� `. ..k vC1, stage 1 co.nf ff vvol vC2 St2 e 2 hVvb.`' Y,, tz.:; y Z J n zn n It , rvti o 7 i o- . vCu, unblocked vol 858 876 268 855 841 409 283 458 hai. 4 C{ - . tC sing.etst�. .T1. &.,5... 62 ` T� ��s�.�xriB '��4 ��'�£.��£,w4,�..��` '.. tC, 2 stage (s) ��' t :s . $ S`35 4U � a38+ =35V ,40%x x 3 .fieak k; p0 queue free % 94 97 97 73 94 96 97 97 • CW Pki t(elti, 24$ v=270 „ r779z.. Fa5 °;2;8 ` I 8Pt s" i�` 01.7- 3a s,. s+" 'n ,a .r ii; ia; i rr '„'4 '., art :par „ - • • . Volume Left 14 66 42 33 y Vot n16__t i 1% '_g4 237 , 9$ �y{2 " . _*'", , u,.`. .^a'"'`�fi'" ',�i;Lin §. # `₹tt Y .,.::: �'" s,t `X' cSH 385 294 1280 1103 Volume ggapacity "4.42 037 : 0,03` :'6103gµ, f ._.. _ ' ` ° :Y, c1%,,,,,, ,..t, ,.. .-.:,,,u,,,y\124. Queue Length 95th (ft) 10 41 3 2 Confrok_'PAIA(irs 1%cc: 24:2 1 0 A 1 y.t$, . ' (1} , g4'` Lane LOS CC AA A*Vio, trilW 5);Z:L; . 5:6 24:2.'' 1.0 1 t _ z .,.Nfal ,w i , } 'f Approach LOS C C tlfelrs _ Average Delay 4.3 Intersection Capacity Utilization ',__'49.0% : 1CU Levetbf Seiu_ ce, i> AA'' °..#'_ Analysis Period (min) 15 • Ben Waldman 2030 PM Total_TC Mead Twon Center(LSC #070010) Page 7 LSC, Inc. HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2030 PM Total_TC 24: Road A & CR 7 317/2007 C t t r' ti t -' Lane Configurations y7 i S C 4o L tfl ' '- ` �`�' g �� ,, - t4r a' S+Q .t ,;'t -..�4n�-S'~rxp �..t' T autogt�.�,� Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% _- 6 Pt 6 '' d3 ;" 7 ' 93 8" 't,, c l Peak Hour Factor 0.92 }0 92 0.92 0.92 0.92 6.92 0.92 0 92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 H irl ftowrate=())Ri _ t11ta ej 9 47= Y 'k.a 'x x 7 ". Wlk; 7 .06E 7 Pedestrians y La 4..WI,X" ,ft�i,�":Fr..�--cw?_i " #-i± API r.R*n `" ..t*ss 'Av sni *,:,:tx ^�'s€�.''t, ligat = i -�S ..„: Walking Speed (ft/s) Pefce f3[ockage�^ k .� F a3 i M1 4 x xw.:rv..w Fry x .x. .mac x -y C( r r e.v, Y' L. * 'S a)1;4,74 `,X 49 Right turn ry flare(veh) �tlt �3f.RL ,[ #Sr$"... '.".' ...$L4 -�� tPA ...�-�,'_'"A D l}& ° k�k"tr, "z'f` x 7:`k �` �- ` er Median storage veh) ' r -- rgF I gw alata pX, platoon unblocked vC conflr tahg,vatur0 X055 4 m ;1157 699' 371 '272 r s" e" 4� mot, '��'>& vC1, stage 1 conf vol v_�2 st'a e 2 cnnf iGol Fad � } � vCu, unblocked vol 1055 1146 225 1197 999 371 272 564 tCsm9ijtsl - .. . 7i, . r} 5 2a.. 7t h6S,4 62 •` 44.. .". z s, ` 1 ,. tC, 2 stage (s) t $ ._ �3:5335�.{"403 : pr * 22r r p0 queue free % 62 63 74 0 77 88 92 92 • ctapa* iveh/h}` �"a162 m 4 � ' 7& C47r &75y14292 M IA v l 1 ( • Wrtjrr MW ;` ` ;M T ; 12 1 h:V. '=nrW m Volume Left 50 0 195 0 101 0 0 77 0 0 Volame)RFght =, S Ir 2j }' % =7a gn 4 t1 .-19 D,e t4 ,:e � , u cSli 132 436 76 368 1292 1700 1700 1007 1700 1700 VolumeA Capacity Q:38 0 6 ,._255 0 34 0 UB,c. D 22 `D t1 0'0& 9 'tom (Y0%`_ Alt ' Queue Length 95th (ft) 40 107 467 37 6 0 0 6 0 0 Control[)elay(s} `' 46 b 264-;:815 5 "19 3 i_$.Q 0 t 0 D =1 ' } OM0 D a,='" `r Lane LOS ED F C A A ApproachrieIay(s} 297 5.051 k 5 2" '2 g, ' 4 p Approach LOS D F v L' ' Sr;AAi. v.... t.✓pd iYit".:> _CYLn. n5.r.. L j .LG n .wX.>Y41.Y. j63 YL`f�C mew.... w_�«.a. : �J.. a...JM� Average Delay 104.2 Intersection Capacity Utilization ?60 2°foc_ ICU L'e`vel of,servieztB Analysis Period (min) 15 • Ben Waldman 2030 PM Total_TC Mead Twon Center(LSC#070010) Page 8 LSC, Inc. HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2030 PM Total TC 25: Road C & CR 7 3/7/2007 �ii . f '— Tt '\ 1 77 p \► 11 1 1 fAfLane ConfigZuurations 4 I� iQI1trQ1' �fi .. . x.r_ t",a�it01}'�- z3s-' i.y' k a -s,�yw.�:a' �:�� £+�:.- la '� ' Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% E Votnrrie(fretil[- .r". . j 1141;V i :F3$.7, 1 r 'I V$t 324- ; 9 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 H,r �l rrate3t t *2 s dt 5t5-a17 ( , i 52k 2 , '9 4 Pedestrians ta tett + . aati s'i a k h to , r s .- e - ,x. - unt '�-g Speed .e. ;� fin_._. ,...}.e. '.'- a, vn d'=,...t 4 ^#',+! rya.,. ,•3--�-"-• � �^z �39'c..R7 Walking S (ft/s) Peloc z` S x �W� cenfh Right turn flare(veh) '` Mnr1=. t4 3.-, :..°t. t__ sz`None :' ' Mfalia o°i tS"Yttfr.. g arS h Median storage veh) r. U�S�(_8.�d�.- i₹Jt1 I.lE Y ,ng:'` r� '" -i-Mie ? r- te .��.. cra �.." pX, platoon unblocked uC�c, i etr foIi ne xa 1,Q4 . , Pifik 7'18 . 296,t 7O8 O ...36;13- g98:g., ,- 3,; vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2 stag ,06:00t ty ice.. Oita n, t a .ara vCu, unblocked vol 707 718 296 708 705 368 298 384 tE,'itOits) „ .. 7-fi 65 t 62 !r t7° xit...' , &, n,, ?" a,4 t 4- tC, 2 stage(s) tF . 3'5 4 0- 3, ,y 1(.oi "a; s7 2 '', .,.. l ,„ .a4 p0 queue free % 99 100 99 95 100 99 99 99 • &V p?crty,{v i?. 31 °� 11 44 9.._ .:m , aAWDRW426 x "i %,„ ,..TA faiRtitifitagnigifiCaiiYalOTUt lume 2 17 12 134 8 VoVolume'#i Leftrgtlt„ :i5 4 �-"- 32 :: '1" 5, l ., ii cSH 558 380 1263 1175 Volull!e td gapacity t7:t)t 0;06 x`0 01 1k01,r a, . _ �-a ,n y. =z Queue Length 95th (ft) 1 5 1 0 Co0(7010elay(s). 1165E 15 0 0 3 0 3 4., :? 4; ,l r 5 l Lane LOS B C A ""A Approach Delay'(s)t: 11.5 T5.0 ;`' „0.3 .$3 . ,w4t '," ._ Approach LOS B C Average Delay 0.9 Intersection.Capacitguttlization . . '34 0%a . a: ICU Level of Service A.` Analysis Period (min) 15 • Ben Waldman 2030 PM TotalTC Mead Twon Center(LSC# 070010) Page 9 LSC, Inc. HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2030 PM Total TC 26: WCR 32 & Road B / { 3/7/2007 -- Lane Configurations_ '� 4 V Plgt�x3.031t 1D 'ms's;-r l J' aa . a +TM"e` r...sa. g fri�'' W�'cr -.y`�"i#' T.. 94 4"�.. F��mss ' �,�° �—�..e.s.._&��. t.,oSt.f?ra- �, —�„ _ �. � ;= F'��. .:� �� b: &'_€ Grade .,9 0% _ 0% 0% V etUM ria g �t3 40 57 if4:W 49[ �a . fet a'z-..°d��s._.:aS.,�'S..m��.'` �x,.K�?.a ._c�. .F._ =�._<-...., ",`°`'a..- .a�,�� x .x'�=°,.a..+�...r^.,.:'�-`�:' 3,d.... -' F"�t-vM",��"s-, Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 grOWI rat t1 " 92 :'4 }& aZ f a y. 5 F. r a. a�.w,.!�,xy,,, � ,. .� §^;.,'"q�s.,a s+' .�....,., . s o. mss„ .v. r€�._,_..2r ..�xj�,3a�'�"`.*v�.s:'�,;'7�'� i", k. '₹'..3�� r � � -�r,: Pedestrians ititiatTratrizalm-ett" a"�;.i..ce."� , Walking Speed (ft/s) P 'iage vrri Wtw `i x p:. s �s' -5 ate- r �� _ � ";,�i`'r'��'-.s�'� h�;}" £..:�. x�''.�s . ,'tr ,�':-'.'t. ₹,.4 .,"'":. �' t..RSY��w},�. �b'.v� x*c .. Aw" Raµ' Right turn flare (veh) faajair aittiteT:TatieRVAagfcrOtgatiartailMtg**14:1W- `:;11 Median storage vehi)� pX, platoon unblocked "� g EfaAIW, a` ti' W 'fi63=Y:z"a'. ._; r.^. i -�.x -su "a .::' T4�. .. 2$6 1fi� ,.,, vC1, stage 1 conf vol v t„Y$tak onfsoSl - t. a_ *r ka e3 r 2 ..±'_ # ;t ate,.__r3.£ K..%.= t F X lce lk.,jS vCu, unblocked vol 163 266 117 t .bf -ts a 41 6 d ' 6 2 }, , !rte=..{v.5a. ..r ma r �..x -.i �. .. ,�... . — a vl Y b `f`cf'"` 34 tC, 2 stage(s) �... ,F ,.. _.. P.. p0 queue free% 97 78 94 s • F7�1N _ �11 E �Ylfi ax*7AIy $35 `X.. 2114'5 ]#Y.,,) zr ::1\11 It. Volume Left 0 43 152 Vnleinfl n" .,t 9 "' `p cSH 1700 1416 750 \olt th t≤t Capaclf7c . plop -p3 0,27J Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 2 28 'gifi ritV ff _' 6 3 3,a 1'f 6 Lane LOS A B �ipf?laaCpelay,(s}₹ f1+f1 3,3 _"116 • Approach LOS ; :64:185r,°t T3x'da4...° affs i i-S hn-T::;14 7' " ;;:hin'��T`a'.:Kib+ x;� '',rxo'°L'S"`;'' ^-'.4 t. s ^,r *�,r^Fr{k_...�,S.>�..:^,.....,..3..�,.. .w��.sau� a.se. .vde..,�+.S.:rrs�...�..�ue.:�,:lw�.:�PL` ^. �,...S;.... 4'5f Average Delay 5.8 Intersection Capaclt UUhzation 3d_6°!o ICU Level of Service A :: Analysis Period (min) 15 • Ben Waldman 2030 PM Total_TC Mead Twon Center(LSC#070010) Page 10 LSC, Inc. PLANNING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE URBAN DESIGN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ARCHITECTURE Nuszer Kopatz Urban Design Associates 1117 Cherokee Street Denver, CO 80204 July 16, 2008 NUSZER KOPATZ Mead �� design associates Board of Trustees Town of Mead PO Box 626 Mead, CO 80542 Re: Letter of Intent—Equinox Rezoning PA 1-6 PUD Dear Town Board Members: On behalf of Mead Development Group, I welcome the opportunity to present for your consideration the attached application for the rezoning of approximately 35.8 acres of • land into the Town of Mead, Colorado. The proposed rezoning plan comprises three parcels of land located in unincorporated Weld County, approximately three-quarters of a mile west of Interstate 25 on the northeast corner of State Highway 66 and Weld County Road 7. (See attached Vicinity Map). Proposed Land Uses The proposed bubble plan is a diagrammatic vision of the proposed land uses to be developed within the Equinox Annexation and Rezoning PA's 1-6 PUD Application. The overall vision for the PUD incorporates additional land parcels that are currently requesting annexation into the Town and other parcels that are planned to be annexed at a later time. Proposed land uses include Mixed Use (including Commercial, Office, Retail, and Civic) (—48 acres at full build out) and Residential (— 61 acres at full build out). This particular rezoning application includes the land covered by PA's 4-6. Single Family Attached Residential, Mixed Use, Civic, and Commercial uses are anticipated for PA's 4- 6. The final configuration and variety of the Mixed Use land is designed to contain flexible uses to best fit the community's future needs. In preparing the land use proposal and rezoning request, the design team carefully considered the Town of Mead's future land use plan as depicted in the Town of Mead 2004 Comprehensive Plan. The character and pattern of surrounding land uses were also considered, in understanding that future development should be compatible with existing 1 1 17 CHEROKEE STREET DENVER, COLORADO 80204 303.534.3881 fax 303 534.388A nuszcrkopatzcorn and future development. In order to accomplish compatibility, the bubble plan was • designed with appropriate land uses that transition from lower density residential uses at the north perimeter to more intensive residential uses that surround the interior civic, mixed use and commercial uses. The Mixed-Use area planned for the southern perimeter is compatible with the commercial uses planned directly to the west across Weld County Road 7 and south across Highway 66. Traffic and Access The PUD plan proposes one full service, one three-quarter turn and one right-in/right-out access point along State Highway 66 and two full service access points on Weld County Road 7. The more southern of the two access points on Weld County Road 7 is envisioned as a roundabout that will serve the Equinox Annexation and Rezoning PA's I- 6 PUD and Mead Place to the west. The roundabout is intended to promote safer speeds within the community and to reduce turning movement and wait times at the Weld County Road 7 and State Highway 66 intersection. The roundabout will direct the majority of traffic on Weld County Road 7 into Mead Place and the Equinox Annexation and Rezoning PA's 1-6 PUD developments. The northern entrance is intended primarily as a residential entrance to accommodate the remaining residential traffic associated with this project traveling north on Weld County Road 7. Thus, the character and amount of traffic on Weld County Road 7 north of this site is intended to remain similar to today's standard. Preliminary discussions of the plan with the Colorado Department of Transportation and • the Town of Mead staff have been very positive with the understanding that improvements along State Highway 66 and Weld County Road 7 will be necessary to serve the development. Mead Development Group has also begun discussions with CDOT about obtaining access permits for State Highway 66 and is aware of the permit application process. A copy of the Traffic Impact Analysis from LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc. is included in this submittal package for your review. Landscaping and Open Space The design team understands that one of the most important components of a successful community is its curb appeal and amenities. Thus, the proposed PUD provides for a generous amount of open space and parks within a variety of active and passive configurations. The proposal will meet the intent of Town of Mead's Comprehensive Plan for parks and open space. Parking will be set back a minimum of 20' from Weld County Road 7 and 50' from State Highway 66. Buildings will be set back a minimum of 40' (50' in PA's 2-6) from Weld County Road 7 and 50' from State Highway 66. In addition, a comprehensive and layered streetscape vision will be developed within these buffer areas, as well as within the internal community streets. The landscape will be developed to provide identity to each type of area and distinguish them from other areas. Buildings and Architecture The final plan of the community will entail provisions for appropriate residential and architectural controls, which will promote variety and continuity in building design, the use of high quality building materials, and the use of architectural features appropriate to 2 the scale and character of the Town of Mead. The PUD contains Housing Diversity • Standards and a separate Design Guidelines document will be created during the platting design stages. Water and Sewer Service According to the local water and sewer districts, water and sewer services are readily available to the Equinox Annexation and Rezoning PA's 1-6 PUD properties. The property will be primarily served by Longs Peak Water District and the Saint Vrain Sanitation District. The applicant has initiated discussions with both service districts. hi closing, Mead Development Group is committed to working with the Board of Trustees and the Town of Mead staff to develop a master planned community that Mead will support and enjoy. We look forward to your support of this application. Please contact me with questions and requests for additional information at 303-534-3881 x 141. Sincerely, Randy Duzan, Principal • Attachments: Vicinity Map Annexation Application CC: Joe Gerdom Gary West Dan Dean • 3 • COUNTY ROAD 34 / WELKER AVE. (7 f7 -' c z z z COUNTY ROAD 32 x O O D D v v N V MULLIGAN RESERVOIR iS4YaE@ghng STATE HIGHWAY 66 • EQUINOX REZONING PA'S 1-6 PUD FOSTER SITES RESERVOIR O / COUNTY ROAD 28 Equinox Rezoning PA's 1 -6 PUD VICINITY MAP Mead, Colorado MEAD PARTNERS OPERATING,OD Date: July 16, 2008 gigita,tia 774-1822 nTH2,Krt Scale : 1 " = 3000' �onh meomn • TOWN OF MEAD LAND USE CODE FORM D-3 APPLICATION AND DECISION RECORD FOR A LAND USE CHANGE OF MAJOR IMPACT CHANGE IN USE (ZONING) Name of Subdivision: Equinox Rezoning PA's 1-6 PUD Applicable Section(s): 1-4, 6-9 Copies Required: A. Change In Land Use Submission Requirements. 1. Applicant's name, address and telephone number: Mead Development Group, 9055 East Mineral Circle, Suite 100, Centennial, CO 80112 Ph. 303-726-2147 2. Provide a description of the current land use of the property, the proposed land use and the • justification for the proposed change. The current land is used for agricultural purposes and supports one residence. The proposed land use is Mixed-Use and will primarily contain commercial, retail, civic, office, and recreational open spaces. Some single family detached or attached uses are also possible. This change is land use is justified based on the approval of uses for commercial and mixed-use areas directly to the west and south. The approved uses and the proposed uses are in conformance with the land uses found in the 2004 Comprehensive Plan for this Planning Area. 3. Legal description of the property proposed for the land use change. Attach proof of ownership in the form of a current title policy(less than 30 days old), or other evidence of ownership acceptable to the Town Attorney: See Rezoning Exhibit A (attached) for legal descriptions. 4. Provide a list of the owners of adjacent property(300 foot radius, excluding adjacent streets or other rights-of-way)certified by a title company within the previous 30 days. See Tab 7. The owners listed are certified via Weld County. Multiple owners have been researched and included where applicable. 5. Proposed land use change is located in Mead Performance District No. 3 . 6. Attach the Fiscal Impact Analysis, Form D-4, or Form D-4C. 7. Attach the Agreement for Payment of Review and Development Expenses Incurred by the Town, Form D-5. • MEAD-D-3 FORM LUC -CHANGE IN USE.DOC 1/13/07(3:37 pm) Page 1 of 6 a. Application fee(non-refundable)= $50.00. • b. Cash deposit(refundable)for reimbursement of Town=s cost of processing application,publishing and mailed notices, legal,engineering and consulting fees= $2,500.00. 9. Signature of the Applicant: By this acknowledgment, the undersigned hereby certify that the above information is complete and true. (If the applicant is not the owner(s)of the subject property, the owner(s), mortgage and/or lienholder shall also sign the Application.) Mead Partners Operating Co., LLC X Owner Date: S —( —t O6b Mead Pa ers Operating Co., LLC by Rod Schmidt, Manager -CiSTATE OF COLORADO ) COUNTY OF P�r.4tckr ) SS. The forego ng ) /� C �trument was acknowledged before me this "t day of M t[( 20 tom; by Yea Ito/ 3, `I$;uMMwb., a- L/ `OP�,cYANT ac ii��h I My commission expires:;1Z Ifry"'r L6, 3.!%_ ,, Witness My hand and officili seP.T4q s. a zN,• 'oV1O ` @otary Public -O�?^ .-,,,,,p - Off\: oC Owner: rrt�i �fi,;, CQ�4?,P Date: --f 3'..-C J es and Twyla R. Vtlulf Lidih trust • STATE OF COLORADO ) , ) SS. COUNTY OF ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this /311". day of /r CL J 200 1 by /Y1Afy 6,r° p,:nicer hZv ite-� My commission expires: J Witness My hand and official seal. /yt _ /1 y Notary Publ' l J Owner: Date: s - 2,04 Equinox Mead, LL by George R. Hanlon, Jr., Manager Equinox Mead Land Venture, LLC EMILY VINZ STATE OF COLORADO ) NOTARY PUBLIC ,7 �� SS. STATE OF COLORADO COUNTY OF�t� �' rD �fR is ign Expifgs 90/ 0/2898 foregoing ) strument was acnowle ged before a this C-l�-� day of 20 by `—CADYl?�fiJ /1. . Q Y)/ r�l�J My commission expires:) • Witness My hand and official seal. MEAD-D-3 FORM LUC -CHANGE IN USE 1/13/07(3:37 pm) Page 2 of 6 .. EMILY VINZ si NOTARY PUBLIC s TATE COLORADO S s • Notary Public my C missionOF Expires_10/30/2010 Owner. � .�� Date: 5/v1/46 Equinox Mead, LLC by Gene A. Osborne, Equinox Mead Land Venture, LLC STATE OF COLORADO ) / r ) SS. f-t COUNTY OF Ql:flin;t,J `") The forego�iggs instrument was acknowledged before me this a C� 20_?by tif {1e- , AF , t lDrnr - I YVINZ My commission expires: NOT' -Y PUBLIC Witness My hand and official seal. _ ' -TATE OF COLORADO 010 Notary Public -- KC Owner Date: -2 - ZQ &3 Equinox Mead, LLC by Rodney J. Schmidt, General Partner, Rocker Enterprises, LLLP STATE OF COLORADO ) SS. COUNTY OF C1,OLQc{er ) • The foregRmg instrument was acknowledoeed before me this q , day of , 20O8 by (�orin J'- C.ckrAc • My commission expires: 2-1 "-i-t to'° j d�auS(DAVjs'op, Witness My hand and official seal. Notary Public , S :?OiAq awes i _ iir- Chansler P erty - '. PUEll-,G. Q9 Owner: Date: 76 gje..i' C,C'; Robert Chansler 7q7////OF �`,,;,. STATE OF COLORADO ) ) SS. COUNTY OF tx;Gia1/ ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 3 day of J It NA Pitt 20 OR by Kobrit 12,:En5I.e, - +OTA yi`aa My commission expires: I h3/20I' 7 in Witness My hand and official seal _.y(,, . _] G ilidniTi Notary Public OFtcyt.OP P MY COMMISSION EXPIRES Owner: A Date: -S' 28' ZOO JANUARY 23.2012 • Equinox Mead, Ltd by George R. Hanlon, Jr., Manager Equinox Mead Land Venture, LLC / MEAD-0-3 FORM LUC -CHANGE IN USE 1/13/07(3:37 pm) Page 3 of 6 • STATE OF COLORADO ) p ) SS. COUNTY OF }4yn -1 ` , The foregoing instrument wa owl dged before me th �T day of r L' 20 rr tby rr-�� ,,I My commission expires: EMILY VINZ Witness My hand and official seal. NOTARY PUBLIC b STATE O.COLORADO yM� No ary Public My Commission Er:,,-: '0/30/2010 Owner: J GS et- Date: 5/286 g Equinox Mead, LLC by Gene A. Osborne, Equinox Mead Land Venture, LLC STATE OF COLORADO ) SS. COUNTY OF4tp*J '�, FLI The forego''g instrument was acknowledged kefore me thi • day oft-', 20 (13by (7cnc) A. itb me J My commission expires: (� EMILY VIN ; Witness My hand and official seal. / NOTARY PUI3LIc 1 RAD O s Notary Pu lic ,, ,,.�., i / / My Commission Expires 10/30/2010 • Applicant Applicant: tLQ__ Date: 5("800'8 Mead Development Group by Roger Hollard STATE OF COLORADO ) SS. COUNTY OF Arap4.L� Q 1 Toe foregoi instrument w s acknowled a ay of before me this &CJ df Maw , 20 et by apf' HQ / ICS-.{m J My commission expires: EMILY VINZ Witness My hand and official seal. NOTARY PUBLIC ; (-`2. _ Notary Pu li STATE Of COLORADO J{ My Commission Expires 10/30/2010 APPLICANT NOT TO WRITE BELOW THIS LINE******************* B. Review Agency Comments. • MEAD-03 FORM LUC -CHANGE IN USE 1/13/07(337 pm) Page 4 of 6 1. Building Official: • 2. Town Engineer. 3. Town Attorney: 4. Other Referrals: C. Further information requested, if any: D. Action by the Planning Commission: 1. The application is complete. Yes G No G 2. The application is for a change in land use. Yes G No G 3. The requirements of the Mead Land Use Code have been satisfied. Yes G No G 4. The application is: G approved G disapproved • G approved with the following conditions: a) b) c) (attach additional conditions as necessary) DONE by the Mead Planning Commission of Mead, Colorado, this_day of , 20_ ATTEST: Secretary to the Commission Chairman E. Action by the Board of Trustees. 1. The application is complete. Yes G No G • 2. The application is for a minor land use change. Yes G No G MEAD-D-3 FORM LUC -CHANGE IN USE 1113)07(3:37 pm) Page 5 of 6 • 3. The requirements of the Mead Land Use Code have been satisfied (see attached Form D-5). Yes G No G 4. The application is: G approved G disapproved G approved with the following conditions: a) b) c) (attach additional conditions as necessary) DONE by the Mead Board of Trustees of Mead, Colorado,this day of , 20 ATTEST: • Town Clerk Mayor • MEAD-D-3 FORM LUC -CHANGE IN USE 1113/07(337 pm) Page 6 of 6 't TETRA TECH • MEAD TOWN CENTER PA'S 1-6 REZONING EXHIBIT A-LEGAL DESCRIPTION THE WEINGARDT ESTATES SUBDIVISION AND THAT TRACT OF LAND LYING SOUTH OF COLORADO STATE HIGHWAY 66 ALL BIENG LOCATED IN THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 68 WEST OF THE 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN,TOWN OF MEAD, COUNTY OF WELD, STATE OF COLORADO BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 22, WHENCE THE WEST QUARTER CORNER BEARS NORTH 00°26'23"WEST 2648.73 FEET, SAID LINE FORMING THE BASIS OF BEARING FOR THIS LEGAL DESCRIPTION; THENCE ALONG THE WEST LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 22 NORTH 00°26'23"WEST 762.82 FEET; THENCE NORTH 88°49'43' EAST 30.00 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF WELD COUNTY ROAD 7, SAID POINT BEING THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF WEINGARDT,ESTATES AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID WEINGARDT ESTATES NORTH 88°49'43' EAST 2479.98 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WEST BOUNDARY OF LOT B OF RECORDED EXEMPTION NO. 1207-22-4-AMRE-2318; THENCE ALONG THE WEST BOUNDARY OF SAID LOT B SOUTH 00°26'39' EAST 614.82 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF COLORADO STATE HIGHWAY 66; THENCE ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY THE FOLLOWING 4 COURSES; THENCE NORTH 87°34'04'WEST 794.68 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT(SAID CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF 11565.00 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 04°12'46"AND A CHORD WHICH BEARS NORTH 88°4920"WEST 850.12 FEET), 850.32 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89°48'45'WEST 319.40 FEET; • THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT(SAID CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF 11565.00 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 2°18'45", CHORD OF SAID ARC BEARS SOUTH 89°01'54"WEST 466.63 FEET)466.66 FEET; THENCE NORTH 46°52'35"WEST 69.50 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF WELD COUNTY ROAD 7; THENCE ALONG SAID EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE NORTH 00°26'23"WEST 472.24 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. TOGETHER WITH THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED TRACT. COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 22,WHENCE THE WEST QUARTER CORNER BEARS NORTH 00°26'23"WEST 2648.73 FEET, SAID LINE FORMING THE BASIS OF BEARING FOR THIS LEGAL DESCRIPTION; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 22 NORTH 89°2927" EAST 30.00 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF WELD COUNTY ROAD NO. 7 AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE ALONG SAID LINE NORTH 00°2623"WEST 91.34 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTH RIGHT- OF-WAY LINE OF STATE HIGHWAY NO. 66; THENCE ALONG SAID LINE THE FOLLOWING FOUR COURSES; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT(SAID CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF 11415.00 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 02°35'13"AND A CHORD WHICH BEARS NORTH 88°53'39" EAST 515.37 FEET), 515.42 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89°48'45" EAST 320.87 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT(SAID CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF 11415.00 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 04°13'32"AND A CHORD WHICH BEARS SOUTH 88°49'23" EAST 841.66 FEET), 841.85 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 87°34'04" EAST 930.73 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EAST LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 22; THENCE ALONG SAID EAST LINE SOUTH 00°33'32"EAST 20.28 FEET TO THE SOUTH QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 22; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER • OF SAID SECTION SOUTH 89°29'27"WEST 2607.12 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. THUS DESCRIBED TRACTS CONTAIN 35.757 ACRES MORE OR LESS. 1900 S.Sunset Street,Suite 1-F Longmont,CO 80501 Tel:303.772.5282 Fax:303.772.7039 www.tetratech.com TOWN OF MEAD • LAND USE CODE FORM D-4 FISCAL ANALYSIS (Required for all Preliminary and Final Applications) (for Major Land Use Changes) Applicable Section(s): Copies Required: Applicant's name, address and telephone number: Mead Development Group 9055 East Mineral Circle, Suite 100 Centennial, CO 80112 Ph:303-726-2147 Name of the Project: Equinox Rezoning PA's 1-6 PUD REVENUES. A. Recurring Revenues: 1. Property Tax. Market value all single family units [64,750,000](') x factor[ 7.96 % ]2) =Assessed Valuation [5,154,100] • Market value all multi-family units [215,550,0001(1) x factor[ 7.96 % 1(2) =Assessed Valuation [17,157,780] Market value all mobile home units [N/A111) x factor[7.96 % 12) = Assessed Valuation [ N/A ] Market value all non-residential structures [68,234,040](') x factor[ 29% 112) =Assessed Valuation [19,787,871.6] Total Assessed Valuation [42,099,752] Total Assessed Valuation [42,099,752 ] x Town mill levy [ 11.522 mills ](3) = Town Property Tax Revenue [485,073.3425] Total Assessed Valuation [42,099,752] x St. Vrain School mill levy [ 37.798 mills ](3) = School Property Tax Revenue [1,591,286.426] Total Assessed Valuation [42,099,752] x Mt. View Fire District mill levy [ 7.817 mills 1") = Fire District Property Tax Revenue [329,093.7614] Page 1 of 8 (4 Developer's projected market value. (2)Call county assessor to determine what factor to use in order to obtain current assessed value of proposed development • from market value in the area. (3)Contact the Town Clerk for current factors. Mead - D-4 Form LUC - Revised 1-31-06.doc January 31, 2006 Total Assessed Valuation [42,099,752] x Weld County mill • levy[ 16.804 mills ]13) = County Property Tax Revenue [707,444.2326] Total Assessed Valuation [42,099,752] x St. Vrain San. Dist. mill levy [ .197 mills ]13)= St. Vrain San. Dist. Tax Revenue [8,293.6511] Total Assessed Valuation ;42,099,752] x all other mill levies [ 4.253 mills ]1 ) = Other Property Tax Revenue [179,050.2453] Total Property Tax Revenue [3,300,241.659] 2. Sales Tax. Population in the development [2,743*] x the last year's per capita collection [ $48.46 ]13) =total annual sales tax revenue [132,925.78] Estimated gross retail sales within the development [unknown] x 2%(3) =total annual sales tax revenue [Not Available] 3. Sewer Revenue. Population in the development [2.743*] x the last year's per capita collection J $75.21 ]13) =total annual sewer revenue [N/A****] 4. Other Revenue(taxes, fees, permits, etc.). • Population in the development [2,743*] x the last year's per capita collection] $65.80 1131 = total other revenue [180,489.40] Nonresidential - business licenses, liquor licenses, etc.(3) =total annual other revenue [Not Available] TOTAL RECURRING REVENUE [3,613,656] B. One-Time Revenues. 1. Building Permits. Market value of structure(s) [348,534,040]1"x factor[ .0099375 + $30.00/BP ] = building permit revenue [3,465,057.023**] 2. Use Taxes. Market value of structure(s) [348,534,040]1') x 50% x 2% = use tax revenue [3,485,340.4] 3. Sewer Plant Investment. Page 2 of 8 lit Developer's projected market value. 12)Call county assessor to determine what factor to use in order to obtain current assessed value of proposed development • from market value in the area. (3)Contact the Town Clerk for current factors. Mead - D-4 Form LUC - Revised 1-31-06.doc January 31, 2006 Total taps x factor [ $6,000.00 113)=total PIF [ N/A*'** 4. Storm drainage. • Number of dwelling units [1,143'] x $131 =residential storm drainage impact fees [149,733] Square feet of nonresidential development[568,617] x$0.08/sq.ft. = nonresidential storm drainage impact fees [45,489.36] 5. Transportation. Number of dwelling units [1,143*]x$1,350 =residential transportation impact fees [1,543,050] Square feet of nonresidential development[568,617] x$0.37/sq.ft. = nonresidential transportation impact fees [210,388.29] 6. Open Space. Number of dwelling units [1,1431 x$1,852 = residential open space impact fees [2,116,836] Square feet of nonresidential development[568,617] x$0.47/sq.ft. = nonresidential open space impact fees [267,249.99] 7. Police Protection. Number of dwelling units [1,143*] x $50 • = residential police protection impact fees [57,150.00] Square feet of nonresidential development [568,617] x$0.01/sq.ft. = nonresidential police protection impact fees [5,686.17] 8. Municipal Facilities. Number of dwelling units [1,1431 x $1, 697 =residential municipal facilities impact fees [1,939,671.00] Square feet of nonresidential development [568,617] x$0A3/sq.ft. = nonresidential municipal facilities impact fees [244,505.31] 9. Park System. Number of dwelling units [1,143'1x$462 = residential park system impact fees [528,066.00] 10. Recreation Center. Number of dwelling units [1,143*] x$1, 683 = residential recreation center impact fees [1,923,669.00] Page 3 of 8 m Developers projected market value. Call county assessor to determine what factor to use in order to obtain current assessed value of proposed development • from market value in the area. Contact the Town Clerk for current factors. Mead - D-4 Form LUC - Revised 1-31-06.doc January 31, 2006 11. Downtown Revitalization (public facilities). Number of dwelling units [1,143`] x $304 • = residential downtown revitalization impact fees [347,472.00] 12. Capital Equipment. Number of dwelling units [1,1431 x $316 = residential capital equipment impact fees [361,188.00] Square feet of nonresidential development[568,617] x $0.091 sq.ft. = nonresidential capital equipment impact fees [51,175.53] TOTAL ONE TIME REVENUE [16,741,727.07] II. EXPENDITURES. A. Recurring Costs. 1. Street Maintenance. Acres in development [108.6] x 4% x factor[ $2,287.00 ](3) = total street maintenance costs [248,368.20] 2. Police Protection. Projected population at full development [2,7431 x per capita cost of police protection [ $23.87 it 31 • =total police protection costs [65,475.41] Square feet of nonresidential development[568,617] x [unknown]t3> = nonresidential police protection costs [Not Available] 3. General Government. Projected population at full development[2,743'] x per capita cost of general government [ $87.18 ]tat = total general government costs [239,134.74] Square feet of nonresidential development [568,617] x [unknown]t3) = nonresidential general government costs [Not Available] 4. Parks and Recreation. Projected population at full development [2,7431 x per capita cost of park maintenance [$10.00 ](3) = total park maintenance costs [27,430.00] 5. Sewer Collection and Treatment. Page 4 of 8 i°Developer's projected market value. (')Call county assessor to determine what factor to use in order to obtain current assessed value of proposed development • from market value in the area. (3)Contact the Town Clerk for current factors. Mead - D-4 Form LUC - Revised 1-31-06.doc January 31, 2006 Projected population at full development [2,743*] x per capita cost of sewer collection and • treatment[ $100.20 ]13)=total sewer costs [N/A***] 6. Storm Water and Drainage. Projected population at full development [2,743*] x per capita cost of storm water and drainage maintenance [unknown]t31 =total storm water costs [Not Available] Square feet of nonresidential development [568,617] x [unknown]131 = nonresidential storm water costs [Not Available] TOTAL RECURRING COSTS [580,408.35] B. One-Time Costs. 1. Park and Recreation. Projected population at full development [2,743*] x .001 facilities per capita x 5,000 sq.ft. x average cost per sq.ft. for recreation facilities J $65.00 ]131 = total recreation facilities costs [891,475.00] 2. Sewer Plant. Projected population at full development [2,743*] x gallons per capita [ 120 gal. r3)x cost per gallon of capacity [ $150 r=total cost of sewer plant [ N/A***] • TOTAL ONE-TIME COSTS [891,475.00] TOTAL RECURRING REVENUES [798,488] TOTAL RECURRING EXPENDITURES [580,408.35] DIFFERENCE [218,080] TOTAL ONE-TIME REVENUES [16,741,727.07] TOTAL ONE-TIME EXPENDITURES [891,475.00] DIFFERENCE [15,850,252.07] NOTE: *Assumes a maximum total buildout of 1,143 dwelling units at an average rate of 2.4 people per dwelling unit. **Assumes 50 total commercial units that require building permits. *** Fees will be paid to St. Vrain Sanitation District. ************************************************************************* Page 5 of 8 01 Developer's projected market value. Call county assessor to determine what factor to use in order to obtain current assessed value of proposed development • from market value in the area. (3)Contact the Town Clerk for current factors. Mead - D-4 Form LUC - Revised 1-31-06.doc January 31, 2006 • III. Signature of the Applicant. By this acknowledgment, the undersigned hereby certify that the above information is complete and true. (If the applicant is not the owner(s)of the subject property, the owner(s), mortgage and/or lienholder shall also sign the Application.) Mead Partners Ope ing Co., LLC 1( Owner. Date: S—9— to t 8 Mead Partners Operating Co., LLC by Rod Schmidt, Manager STATE OF COLORADO ) p ) SS. COUNTY OF �,,iG4er ) The foregqing instrument was acknowledged before me this 9 day of Nil- 20 MS by n t_i cc la rv1/4,i--1-(- . ` o AVIS Bpi/ My commission expires: 2 1 1 4 1201,c) `�� (`�. .. ` Witness My hand and official seal. ( . m.;?FE O4.6.541, �`:o_• i oz- Notary Public •U;•i �] !, _00- )( Owner. /4n&.:_' ^'�,r Date: 1.3 — C& '/ '°' �w� Gov`` J1mes and TwylaCR. Wulf Living Trust ' "a' ivv ` N " ✓✓✓ • STATE OF COLORADO v�l ) SS. . COUNTY OF ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ', 3Tt- day of M£ 20C by Mar4 L K.,mce,beler ' My commission expires: Witness My hand and official seal. Y 1 014,1 Notary Pubfith U Owner Date: --' zg-zt(7g Equinox Mad, b George R. Hanlon, Jr., Manager Equinox Mead Land Venture, LLC STATE OF COLORADO ) ) SS. COUNTY OF 4'Ltz%jfe) 20 )foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of by C7 e_'—trtnIL� J J age 6 of 8 (I)Developers projected market value. m Call county assessor to determine what factor to use in order to obtain current assessed value of proposed development • from market value in the area. (3)Contact the Town Clerk for current factors. Mead - 13-4 Form LUC - Revised 1-31-06 (2) January 31, 2006 EMILY VINZ , NOTARY PUBLIC My commission expires: ATE OF COLOR/40Q Witness My hand and official seal. • 19~10 Notary • Public Owner. Q.--_ Date: 5-/28/0 e Equinox Mead, L by Gene A. Osborne, Equinox Mead Land Venture, LLC STATE OF COLORADO ) SS. COUNTY OF_Ar Dp yt� Jl T.Dg foregoin,9` instrument r ' was ack4owledge before me this day o. 20 C0by ( int.- ,4- u., ILY VINZ My commission expires: / • NOTARY PUBLIC Witness My hand and official seal. ST TE OF COLORADO rn ;� f1/1R�fiis.! •Notary Public J - � .. U3o/2ot0 pc Owner. C Date: S ' — 1-°°I . Equinox Mead, LLC by Rodney J. Schmidt, General Partner, Rocker Enterprises, LLLP STATE OF COLORADO ) SS. COUNTY OF etttvvtQC ) The foregoing,instrument was acknowledged before me this 2 day of r . • 20 O by (La)hi e, tf. Sc 1t✓Iti;04-4- `"`ttuminentoo,�� ``\ ,�0AVI$ �� My commission expires: =-1 r r-1 f 2O r o /1 ` : Witness My hand and official seal. ( a t O•�PRY \ la No ary Pu Ic = v a Chansler Property /s�pus .pie` )C Owner: 4-I 6-t-0-c --c e_24i Date: 6/649. O s orriiiiiiitio Robert Chansler STATE OF COLORADO ) r. SS. COUNTY OF &t,.Idir ) The foregoing instrum nt was acknowledged before me this 5 day of Sit{ 20 (171 by Rabe' t LhanCier J My commission expires: ( Ia3 hall Witness My hand and official seal. CCiiie\INA;>SiX (1)Developers projected market value. mmCall county assessor to determine what factor to use in order to obtain current assessed value ofevelopm t • from market value in the area. AP pr'r Contact the Town Clerk for current factors. SOGa O CO Or Mead - D-4 Form LUC - Revised 1-31-06 (2)January 31, 2006 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES JANUARY 23,2012 • Notary Public • Owner. Date: .s' Zt-ZGOR Equinox Me d, L C by George R. Hanlon, Jr., Manager Equinox Mead Land Venture, LLC STATE OF COLORADO ) SS. COUNTY OF ArO4)abety The foregoin nstrument was ackncw,led d�before me this 20( ) byt D .JI lL' Y I EMIL V Z My commission expires: I C Ida I I O TA NOTARY FCOULORADO Witness My hand and official seal. 10/30/2010 ub Not�� lic I� Owner. _ r Q.n._� Date: 9/tm/a s Equinox Mead, C by Gene A. Osborne, Equinox Mead La Venture, LLC STATE OF COLORADO ) • SS. COUNTY OF ArQa'(iA4.)7 foregoing jnsl as facckknnowledg before me this LIU 20 (� EM LY VINZ • My commission expires: ID NOTA' PUBLIC P �gJ�/O S 'TE OF COLOF.A00 Witness My hand and official seal. _G-f a' � f�'A � Expires 10/30/2019 Notary Public Applicant Applicant Date: S/Z4 09 M ad Development Group by Roger Hollard STATE OF COLORADO ) SS. COUNTY OF,4r hcf..2 ) The foregoing strument was e5d,before me this �J day of 20 by f�t�gNr 0 , J EMILY VINZ ✓J NOTARY PUBLIC My commission expires: I D 3O/i O STATE OF COLORADO Witness My hand and official seal. mission Expires 10/30/2010 Notary Public Page 8 of 8 (1)Developer's projected market value. m Call county assessor to determine what factor to use in order to obtain current assessed value of proposed development • from market value in the area. (3)Contact the Town Clerk for current factors. Mead- D-4 Form LUC - Revised 1-31-06 (2) January 31, 2006 • TOWN OF MEAD LAND USE CODE Form D-5 Agreement for Payment of Review and Development Expenses Incurred by the Town THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this day of , A.D. 20_, by and between the TOWN OF MEAD, COLORADO, a municipal Corporation, hereinafter referred to as "the Town,"and Mead Development Group; 9055 East Mineral Circle, Suite 100, Centennial, CO 80112, hereinafter referred to as "the Owner/Developer"; WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the Owner/Developer owns of certain property situated in the County of Weld, State of Colorado, and legally described as follows, to-wit: See Rezoning Exhibit A—Legal Descriptions WHEREAS, the development process included all aspects of land use including but not limited to annexation, subdivision, change of land use and the installation of public improvements; and • WHEREAS, the Owner/Developer desires to develop said property and has made application to the Board of Trustees of the Town of Mead for approval of Equinox Rezoning PA's 1-6 PUD; and WHEREAS, the Parties hereto recognize that the cash deposits and non-refundable land use fees as specified by the Municipal Code of the Town of Mead may not be adequate to fully cover the Town's expenses in considering the referenced application, including, but not limited to, legal publications, planning services, engineering services, attorney fees, consultant fees, reproduction of material, public hearing expenses and recording documents; and WHEREAS, the Parties hereto recognize that the Town will continue to incur expenses throughout the entire development process until final completion of the development project; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and of the mutual promises and conditions hereinafter contained, it is hereby agreed as follows: 1. FULL AND SEPARATE ACCOUNTING OF REVIEW AND DEVELOPMENT EXPENSES. The Town will maintain separate accounts of all monies collected and expended as a result of the review of the above referenced application throughout the development process. Monthly statements of expenses incurred and the balance remaining in the account will be made available to the Owner/Developer by the Town. 2. EXPENDITURE OF FEES PAID BY THE OWNER/DEVELOPER. The Town shall expend the monies collected from the Owner/Developer in the form of land use fees and cash deposits, in the payment of expenses incurred in processing the• MEAD FORM D-5-CHANGE N LAND USE.DOC 9/12/05 3:07 pm) Page 1 of 3 • Owner/Developer's request, throughout the development process until final completion of the project. Expenses shall include, but not limited to, fees charged to the Town for legal publications, planning services, engineering services, attorney services, consultant services, reproduction of material, public hearing expenses, the securing of permits and easements and the recording of documents. My cash deposits held by the Town and not expended, will be refunded to the Owner/Developer, without interest, upon completion or termination of project. 3. PAYMENT OF REVIEW AND OTHER EXPENSES BY THE OWNER/DEVELOPER. In the event that the Town incurs expenses for the review of the Owner/Developer's request, greater than the monies collected from the Owner/Developer in the form of land use fees and cash deposits, the Owner/Developer shall reimburse the Town for the additional expenses and/or replenish the cash deposits to the level specified. Said reimbursement and/or replenishment shall be made within ten (10)days of the Town submitting an invoice for the expenses, or a demand for the replenishment of the cash deposit. Failure by the Owner/Developer to pay within the specified time shall be cause for the Town to cease processing the application, or deny the Owner/Developer of the right to appear before Planning Commission or the Board of Trustees, or deny approval of the application, withhold the issuance of building permits or certificates of occupancy. 4. APPLICATION TERMINATION. Except where the law or an agreement with the Town provides otherwise, the Owner/Developer may terminate his application at any time by giving written notice to the Town. The Town shall immediately take all reasonable steps necessary to terminate the accrual of costs to the Owner e.g., notify newspapers to cancel publications, etc. The Owner/Developer will continue to be liable for all costs reasonably incurred by the Town to terminate the application. • COLLECTION OF FEES AND COSTS. If the Owner/Developer fails to pay the fees required herein when due, the Town may take those steps necessary and authorized by law to collect the fees due. The Town shall also be entitled to all court and attorney's fees, other costs incurred in collection and interest on the amount due at the rate of 18% per annum. 6. PERSONAL GUARANTY. At the option of the Board of Trustees, the Owner/Developer may be required to provide a personal guaranty for the payment of review and other expenses. 7. ORIGINAL COUNTERPARTS. This Agreement may be executed as counterparts, each of which will be an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Town and the Owner/Developer have caused this Agreement to be duly executed on the day and year first above written. By this acknowledgment, the undersigned hereby agreed to be bound by the terms and conditions of this agreement. (Signature Instructions:And additional signature lines and notary certificates for each signature.) • MEAD FORM D-5-CHANGE IN LAND USE.DOC 9112/05 3:07 pm) Page 2 of 3 • TETRA TECH • • MEAD TOWN CENTER PA'S 1-6 REZONING EXHIBIT A-LEGAL DESCRIPTION THE WEINGARDT ESTATES SUBDIVISION AND THAT TRACT OF LAND LYING SOUTH OF COLORADO STATE HIGHWAY 66 ALL BEENG LOCATED IN THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 22,TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 68 WEST OF THE 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, TOWN OF MEAD, COUNTY OF WELD, STATE OF COLORADO BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 22, WHENCE THE WEST QUARTER CORNER BEARS NORTH 00°2623"WEST 2648.73 FEET, SAID LINE FORMING THE BASIS OF BEARING FOR THIS LEGAL DESCRIPTION; THENCE ALONG THE WEST LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 22 NORTH 00°26'23"WEST 762.82 FEET; THENCE NORTH 88°49'43' EAST 30.00 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF WELD COUNTY ROAD 7, SAID POINT BEING THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF WEINGARDT€STATES AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING;THENCE ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID WEINGARDT ESTATES NORTH 88°49'43'EAST 2479.98 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WEST BOUNDARY OF LOT B OF RECORDED EXEMPTION NO. 1207-22-4-AMRE-2318; THENCE ALONG THE WEST BOUNDARY OF SAID LOT B SOUTH 00°26'39' EAST 614.82 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF COLORADO STATE HIGHWAY 66;THENCE ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY THE FOLLOWING 4 COURSES; THENCE NORTH 87°34'04'WEST 794.68 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT(SAID CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF 11565.00 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 04°12'46"AND A CHORD WHICH BEARS NORTH 88°49'20"WEST 850.12 FEET), 850.32 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89°48'45'WEST 319.40 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT (SAID CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF • 11565.00 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 2°18'45", CHORD OF SAID ARC BEARS SOUTH 89°01'54"WEST 466.63 FEET)466.66 FEET; THENCE NORTH 46°52'35"WEST 69.50 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF WELD COUNTY ROAD 7; THENCE ALONG SAID EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE NORTH 00°2623"WEST 472.24 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.TOGETHER WITH THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED TRACT. COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 22, WHENCE THE WEST QUARTER CORNER BEARS NORTH 00°26'23"WEST 2648.73 FEET, SAID LINE FORMING THE BASIS OF BEARING FOR THIS LEGAL DESCRIPTION; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 22 NORTH 89°29'27" EAST 30.00 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF WELD COUNTY ROAD NO. 7 AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE ALONG SAID LINE NORTH 00°26'23"WEST 91.34 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTH RIGHT- OF-WAY LINE OF STATE HIGHWAY NO. 66;THENCE ALONG SAID LINE THE FOLLOWING FOUR COURSES; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT (SAID CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF 11415.00 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 02°35'13"AND A CHORD WHICH BEARS NORTH 88°53'39" EAST 515.37 FEET), 515.42 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89°48'45" EAST 320.87 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT(SAID CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF 11415.00 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 04°13'32"AND A CHORD WHICH BEARS SOUTH 88°4923" EAST 841.66 FEET), 841.85 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 87°34'04" EAST 930.73 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EAST LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 22; THENCE ALONG SAID EAST LINE SOUTH 00°33'32" EAST 20.28 FEET TO THE SOUTH QUARTER • CORNER OF SAID SECTION 22; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION SOUTH 89°29'27"WEST 2607.12 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. THUS DESCRIBED TRACTS CONTAIN 35.757 ACRES MORE OR LESS. 1900 S.Sunset Street,Suite 1-F Longmont,CO 80501 Tel 303.772.5282 Fax:303.7717039 www.tetratech.com PLANNING • LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE URBAN DESIGN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ARCHITECTURE July 16, 2008 Mr. Dan Dean NUSZER KOPATZ urean design associates Town of Mead 441 Third Street Mead, CO 80542 Dear Mr. Dean, After reviewing the comments received from the Town of Mead Staff on June 30, 2008 regarding the Mead Town Center Annexation and Rezoning applications, we offer the following responses. General Comment: The Mead Development Review Committee consisting of the town engineer, town planner, legal services, and I have reviewed the proposed Equinox(Mead Town Center) Annexation and the • Equinox (Mead Town Center) Application for Rezoning PA 1-5. While we have a number of comments, many of them are minor and easily addressed. Response: All documents have been revised to reflect the new project titles for both the ' annexation and the rezoning proposals in this submittal. General Issues (Equinox Annexation and Equinox Rezoning PA 1-5 Requests) 1. While there is a clear connection between this property and the Town of Mead, the proposed land uses are not consistent with the Town's Comprehensive Plan. The location of uses, type, and density of uses, and amount of open space differ, and in some cases significantly, from the Plan. Therefore, staff would recommend that the property proposed for annexation be found eligible and the annexation advanced. However, the zoning portion of this action should be modified. Rather than the land use plan proposed by the applicant, staff would recommend both the lands to be annexed as well as the area currently in the Town (Weingardt)be zoned, for the time being, as Business Park, General Commercial, and Low Density Residential, in conformance with the Mead Comprehensive Plan. Response: We propose discussing the proposed land use designations at the public hearings. The documents in this submittal reflect the designations that differ from the Mead Comprehensive Plan. Legal Issues (Equinox Annexation and Equinox Rezoning PA 1-5 Requests) 2. Form D-4, Fiscal Analysis (Tab 2). On page 2, the "Total Recurring Revenue" from property taxes, sales tax for all jurisdictions is $3,613,656, instead of the indicated $313,415. On page 5, the "Total Recurring Revenue" is the Town's portion of the page 2 Recurring Revenue, or$798,488 instead of the indicated $313,415. Therefore, the page 5 7'15/2008 1 1 17 CHEROKEE STREET DENVER, COLORADO 80204 303.534.3881 fax 302 f'4.2884 x'xxv cuszeokcccrz.con Recurring Difference should show a positive revenue stream of$218,080, instead of a • negative of$ -266,993 as shown. Since the applicant duplicated the form for the Land Use Change, it contains the same error. Response: The Fiscal Analysis,Form D-4, has been updated to reflect the above numbers. 3. The title of the annexation map is more appropriate for the rezoning map in its reference to the planned unit development and planning areas. I would suggest that the title for the annexation map be modified to read something similar to: ANNEXATION MAP OF EQUINOX ANNEXATION TO THE TOWN MEAD Response: The title of the annexation map has been modified to reflect the new name. 4. The annexation map cover sheet does not follow the Town's standard formatting. The certificate of ownership should be located on the right-hand side of the cover sheet, followed by the signature blocks preceding in.columns right to left. Paragraph text may be reduced to 10 pt. type. Because of the length of the legal description and the difficulty and reading it, each clause is to be on a separate line, and multiple line clauses are to be preceded and followed by a blank line. Response: The annexation map cover sheet has been reformatted to follow the Town's standard format. • 5. There is an irrigation pipeline that crosses the property from the Highland Ditch, eastward below Mulligan Lake to the eastern boundary of the property. The description for this pipeline may be contained in a warranty deed dated May 20, 1910 and recorded in Book 330, at Page 400, Weld County Clerk and Recorder's Office. If this easement has not been formally abandoned, it must be shown on the annexation plat. Abandonment of this irrigation pipeline will require the concurrence of the presently unidentified downstream properties who receive water delivery through this large (24") pipe. A portion of the easement is shown on the Annexation Impact Map and the Drainage Maps. However, the easement continues to the eastern edge of the property as shown in the documentation for Exception 16 and 20. Response: Tetra Tech obtained a copy of the reference document and determined the pipe to be located across the subject property. The approximate location of the pipe is shown on the Utility Plan and the Annexation Impact Report Map. However, there are no defined dimensions for the easement provided in the document; therefore,the easement is not shown on the Annexation or Rezoning Maps but is referenced in the title commitment notes. 6. The right-of-way easement granted to the Highland Ditch Company(Exception No. 11, Equinox Title Commitment) should be shown on the plat if it encroaches on the property being annexed. It is possible that the Highland Ditch does not cross this property and Exception 11 could be removed from the commitment. Response: The warranty deed granting property to the Highland Ditch Co. (Exception No. 11) is for Mulligan Reservoir, not the ditch itself. The reservoir is • shown on the map. 7. The right-of-way for the pipeline identified in the agreement recorded February 25. 1927. 2 15/2008 in Book 801, at Page 520 (Exception No. 12, Equinox Title Commitment) must be shown • on the annexation map if it has not been formally abandoned. Abandonment of this irrigation pipeline will require the concurrence of the presently unidentified downstream properties who receive water delivery through this large (24") pipe. Response: The pipeline referenced in the above document has a point of beginning located in the current Mulligan Reservoir. This document was written prior to the warranty deed for Mulligan Reservoir(see Exception No. 11 in Comment#6). The location or existence of this pipeline is unknown; therefore,the pipeline is not shown on any maps. Language in the document calls for abandonment of the easement upon a 2-year period of non-usage or abandonment of the pipeline. 8. A"legible"copy of the easements, covenants,restrictions, reservations and notes contained on the plat of RE-3126, recorded October 10, 2001, at Reception No. 2891019 (Exception No. 22, Equinox Title Commitment) should be provided. Response: The applicant printed out the link from the electronic title,The resulting plat, however is less than 8.5 x 11 and thus the print is very small, although legible. The engineer also tried to obtain a larger copy of the plat,but all of our resources lead back to the same link on the title commitment.We have enlarged the plat to the extent possible on an 8.5 x 11 sheet. 9. The concrete ditch and field roads as shown on the improvement location certificate dated November 14, 2007 prepared by Tetra Tech should be shown on the annexation map unless it is intended to be abandoned, in which case a note to that effect should appear on the annexation map (Exception No. 25, Equinox Title Commitment). Response: The concrete ditch and field roads have been shown. • 10. The legal description and annexation map do not coincide on the northeastern corner of the property to be annexed, with the legal description for the Recorded Exemption# 1207-22-3 RE1068 and RE3126. Is there an explanation for the difference in the lengths of the final two lines bordering the Mulligan Reservoir? It is understood that because of the different "basis of bearings" used in the two legal descriptions, there may be some variation in the bearings of lines, but there should not be a difference in the length of the line (MTC= 192.26'vs. RE =189.1'; and MTC=76.17' vs. RE=76.7'). The lengths of the other bordering lines match. Response: A boundary survey was conducted on all the properties located in the south half of Section 22. Boundary lines were adjusted to found monuments and adjoining properties. In this specific case,the line was adjusted based on found property corners and the property at Lot B of Recorded Exemption No. 1207-22-4- AMRE-2318. 11. The applicant should use the attached special warranty deed for non-tributary groundwater(Attachment A) instead of the incomplete one provided in the submittal. The special warranty deed has been completed with all of the blanks in the text filled in. The applicant should provide a statement of authority for the signatures for the New Frontier Bank. Response: The warranty deed submitted in this submittal contains the first two pages from the special warranty deed attached in the lastest comments received from the town. Signatures have been obtained in the time between the last submittal and now. These signatures are attached to the back to form the rest of the warranty • deed. 12. The annexation impact report map has been changed to indicate the irrigation pipeline 3 7/15/2008 traversing the northern half of the property. However, this is actually an irrigation • easement and should be labeled as such with the beneficiary and recording information. Response: The approximate location of the pipeline has been provided with a reference to the Reception No. Specific dimensions for the easement are not provided in the recorded document. 13. The PUD Development Plan Map (Tab 14). The cover sheet should contain the dedication and signature blocks on the one sheet. The text may be reduced from the existing 14 pt. type, to 10 pt. type and the vicinity map reduced in size to make this possible. Response: The PUD Development Plan Map has been revised to reduce the size of the text and to contain the dedications and signature blocks on one sheet. 14. The PUD Development Plan Map (Tab 14). In addition to the oil and gas well setbacks specified, the Town prohibits the construction of a building intended as a place of assembly, institution, or school within 350 feet of a well. It should also be noted that these restrictions apply to production facilities as well as the wells themselves. Response: The PUD document has been modified to include oil and gas well and production setbacks from buildings of assembly, institutions, or schools to be 350 feet. 15. Conceptual Utility Plan (Tab 16). Same comment as in Item 10 above. Response: Please see response to comment above. Land Use and Road Circulation Plans (Equinox Annexation and Equinox Rezoning PA 1-5 • Requests) 16. Access and overall roadway design issues will be reviewed at time of platting and will be subject to coordination with CDOT access management plans for Hwy 66 and the Town's transportation plan (including 3`°Street/WCR 7 traffic rotaries). Response: Comment noted. 17. Total dwelling units and resulting densities are inconsistent with current Mead planning standards. Response: We propose discussing the proposed dwelling units and resulting densities at the public hearings. The documents in this submittal reflect the dwelling units and resulting densities that differ from current Mead planning standards. 18. Land use in PA-4 and PA-5 should be predominately non-residential. Land use tables for these PA's should be amended to meet the Mead Land Use Plan recommendations. Overall, commercial land use area minimums should be consistent with the Mead Comprehensive Plan. Response: We propose discussing the proposed land use designations for PA-4 and PA-5 at the public hearings. The intent is that the use in these areas would be predominantly non-residential. A maximum of 40% residential is allowed to accommodate market conditions in the future if the market does not support a high level of non-residential use. The documents in this submittal reflect the land use designations that differ from the Mead Comprehensive Plan. • 4 15/2008 • 19. Cul-de-sac lengths for higher residential densities (over 4.0/du/acre) should not exceed • 500'. The Mead Place approval for 600' was based on lower densities than proposed here. Response: We propose discussing the proposed cul-de-sac length at the public hearings. The documents in this submittal reflect the cul-de-sac length that differs from current Mead planning standards, but is the same as the Mead Place standard. 20. Tab 14/7-8: Street, building, and parking setbacks differ from Mead Place in several areas. Moreover, Mead has an intergovernmental agreement(IGA) with Longmont that affects required setbacks and design along the Hwy 66 corridor(Attachment B). Response: The street, building and parking standards have been reviewed, and revised where appropriate to incorporate the IGA agreement with Longmont. The street and parking setbacks have also been reviewed with regard to the Mead Place standards. Different dimensional standards are proposed in an effort to create the densities that are necessary to support the amount of commercial develoament envisioned for this area. We propose discussing the differing street,building and parking setbacks at the public hearings. 21. The proposed development regulations are not consistent with the State's OGCC rules for building and structure setbacks (OGCC Rule 603). 'The proposed development must comply with Mead Municipal Code Section 16-8-320, Setbacks from oil and gas wells and production facilities. Response: The PUD document has been modified to include oil and gas well and production setbacks from buildings of assembly, institutions, or schools to be 350 feet. • 22. The development regulations propose significantly less open space than required by the Mead Development Code. Also, the Town's policy on acceptable land contributions needs to be referenced. Response: We propose discussing the proposed open space provisions at the public hearings. The documents in this submittal reflect the proposed open space policy, which differs from the Mead Development Code. 23. In terms of permitted uses, it should be clear that all sales must be retail in nature. Response: We propose discussing the proposed land and permitted uses at the public hearings. 24. Front setbacks should clearly account for sidewalks. A minimum 20' from access could infringe on sidewalks. Response: Front setbacks have been reviewed to account for sidewalks. The PUD requires 20' minimum from the garage door to the Right-of-Way line. In these cases, the sidewalk will be in the Right-of-Way, so there is a minimum of 20' to the sidewalk on a front loaded product at the driveway location. The PUD also requires 20' from the Interior Access Easement in residential areas. In the theoretical case of an interior access easement, the street would likely be a private drive and would not have a sidewalk or the street section would be specialized to ensure that a sidewalk was 20' from a garage door. Open Space • 25. The current proposal is not in conformance with Article XIII of the Mead Development Code related to Parks and Open Space. 5 7;15.'_008 Response: We propose discussing the proposed open space provisions at the public • hearings. The documents in this submittal reflect the proposed open space policy, which differs from the Mead Development Code. Environmental and Wildlife Report 26. When a complete development plan is submitted, it will be important to require a landscape maintenance note for any dry land seeding areas. In order for these areas to be established, some form of automatic or manual irrigation is needed. The document refers to Lordson Mead, LLC as the applicant. Is this correct? Response: Comment noted. The Phase I study refers to Lordson Mead as the client. At the time of the report's preparation, March 2007, Lordson Mead, LLC was the party working to submit the annexation and rezoning properties for review by the Town. Since March of 2007 and March of 2008,when the properties where actually submitted for review by the town, Lordson Mead has transferred the application and interest in the property to Mead Development Group, the current applicant. Roger Hollard,the applicant representative, and Rodney Schmidt were part of the Lordson Mead, LLC group and the current applicant and provide continuity between groups. The Phase I report includes the same area of interest that the current application for the Equinox annexation and rezoning covers and the information within is still relevant. 27. The study indicates that some type of hazardous waste/spill affects one of tract, Parcel 3. That parcel is not shown on the map. Response: Nuszer Kopatz has a call placed to the author of the Phase I study to • clarify the location of Parcel 3. At this time,we have not been able to clarify this item, but will pass along the information when it becomes available. 28. Actions to fully mitigate hazardous waste/spills and possible contamination around oil and gas facilities will be required as part of the platting process. Response: Comment noted. i 6 G ii1 01 1 1. ma w4 O a.a = Hill ^ i '3 8 01 e8 u m g 3 I- a y . g c �� °9 W ._ a RW t E d m o= 8 < o 2 O 3 §: X . _; 0 < ` ; a 0 o w g Gt' " i oo H� IM ° 0 $ 2 sa-I 31d1SJ31NI �� < <0'2 ele� /. .,.c �� 2 wa 16 8 I 3I , $ ry 0 a g R S o a E k k 1/40 A H 88 �Q w o F Wozo & y ti III e mii w c G 6 `loo? 3 i u°i 3 FR �- ql 0` 2 S 52 5 • ��00 — og 2 o �' ex J' ` 0 y ;pn� Leib 5 o o oqocc'd ' 3 At. 3 rR. m o e U W i� i St . o Z�YYII 0 / r o LL U m ]< oVry U m 0 - d ta o m— \I L UN 207d A1N003 43 m s^ 0 .F° - ? s �o o i J 3yi _ 20 a 3 `ti o t F w F9 qq 0 °tm Eo 5 o WO a] 6w iEg rc O 8 o p 2 �W =0 Y ol r5 iL _ E 'xJ'rco' ZC0 E k 3 % iJo z`'628 C 3 _xa 'n Y. = < F8 N<0S40 < `n 1 n D2 °9z 6 08 0?, 2m o"' om c‘ a °a td 0W 1-I-o w 3 oO8 j p 0(n 0. U n0 U 4� O o_i m p j a r-.N1 OJ UWO J ' Q Qo O X JwNK 0O m O N Few 0 O p m . 7 a o o ;g p l = m Ixm w _ W o r z = oa t g" m o = . i - J = i D n V GOG K v U p u v U = w w2J� I O 0 Q Cr JOZ O(J 4o 3 = Y O z g oo Z Z s W Z2Z Y F Z O 6 0 U ° Z O SQ¢a ° 3 ° 0 i cS 3 i 1-WZ O^ �• a ^p^^ ° �^^• ° O Nfr- CJO p d oo pI 00 U NQ m O V} JO T J0 VY oZU 2 p O8 € D a� Q U � a�z w 0 ° fpf ° O ° 0 O o <wa 52 5 w z ° I a 2 w w z LLm N w G 0 rr w 8 22 v' V FF w G OU rr • ry 4O~N Li t 0v-ralpZp23° F3 WW Q`� wI� p %O0a1:11,1 aW 0a r Ir.;io la 1a1 Vaa6 Njw°3==iwt zdao'.°� <3O 0QOb F1, -.RN. N O w hi - pOpN ?Z$N< O® I .JN 3-,,,,,(° -osZ�<0u0_ �Nm FI0 Qz ° J_LLJ °w° t(iT 2„2m6< .0 J<m 0i3i<mo3o!aVpF° 58Q w V o ° ~z �08r2zjz W<LLc lag0 ° U� a o apa 0 J p ° S�NJJ O°CUUW>>phw II.J 9N YJZ K 'aJ <.m ZNFj w(ii p OwF,F _mWz w0Ga =<Ztggy4°2 w° t Wa Ill = o wz -� o wr Ju _pa w �'3'aw<L"o_=ems. ° ow90 ow p " xrIGm2 PL°A a= IFSaoGF %;?5;i� 1,7;g83 g83 0 va 03 32515.0< 6.3...2s8' .2'°n �+ ' cnomm � o wa 'm J n� ° zG, e''26-Ooe oe-J'm.eGUhZF Ns �'6o C-SUI 0w 8o tr m n or w0s pwm knit af3vd i.w zoowuo�< F a�i ��oF 0 z a Eii o gca 0g :aoiWi<zn_ol.iw2 o"'Flz.'�u �So.wg--�. m�-0 'mr & E o o2 niti FLLZowGONF0€mw oo°g-vgt-r..7 mpooN 2 o in �+ .= mQ F3mga 0.L.J00..8. ow Ow oOJ 8v w€2..,2 wrmat zza 0z z4 °0 z\ � ° I 0 0 :KS 224O i"tge3e 3gzpw8,oW,4,e, P( g N zo'",r omsy 0G00,8r_n< ro< 26205 p�8Lc, o'48-60°-la "z < 00 3- 'a p w` o_ rc '0'2 8iZ ₹Fa0 '631--e ^,F 2o5-`°2F2 F<"S. t E i-Ft�° omn Flm wB 8 r;(9' Z Ixr 3Q z q;n om2 t,� rz« "2EGt^'aro omo�gaEa ₹₹ om °3 a f o 3`z NUJ swag W«orv2a'z. m �"V4L.'�.,' GrvooB 2dmowm?I�w lm„n a�Wm D ”, ₹ wpm =I 5G7m =Finaw8Y?0. oa '4 w°Fr3< 3<-:$iOO ° 56F2 3 s �z !' m '�°a F in°'=' i" F 3m�e � =o 3o z° ww ii c°i ' }} ° p� w o m r2Fw NNF �? gW ¢ 'VIo &' FI.1₹44>2 "F"Za ti °ym vi F< z U 6p L 33 ¢ G� z F Gw,_Gp o we i r-2tpz )03� � o 3 5 a �o° GmO� .. sCwo'o�rct03'�s Wz = innSrw=-. 8� o y woo n ,.42. p FaF. aarcv,GoE<ama �o 4,4.2w� w+mz. Fo W<ja 1 .. 00 -tw'Iz2. a° "0R °Uwm 8- ap a 5q ojux 31- m'"o< 'n o zr vg JN err z mQ =RN Fo. q F o al � _� sm 2 'a a3-oFs� zF m� On- J�wW -bzo 0 ° G s yy z 32- 0 iioopss0o420.;cmz0 aZ t"� ioo• n=w mt p WI a 6 ZN m a q' a ooF o ♦." n Orr 811_t 0 o 3 3 iV 3 Uw'O = S:Rii !;(2 Sm 2 2 ttOJr2' 18 S w o '£ I _ i- sJtiF zi J'nso qq 000 ¢� a F5 x Fo Fi o o 'J' 2w 55000UOm'ZI'°ICS 3 0 `J' r0-ojrc0Li3mov°'<'ry FJJa OvWi w a FF oYW:Non MWSttx-N1s -3N023AS^.SV.r\Onn Iw OCCL\a:016954 rn!041:11 90Z MI o.r eoq.Ipry Y8 p7 w $ P y g eil CM i i " ss = \ $ U I. c I I 8RI ~$ l£c£LS£ ON -036 \ I ��Vn co orviiea?ao sa 3Ni_vd Ov3ry NOQ'33'32"W 5337_89' ___ __ _ o W g3 h' NM n a Bld?IJXJ CZ -b-ZZ-LOZL 'ON u o I'V NaldlUX3 030!10938 JO 8 101 \ I 590L'.££ 'ON '03d I u—N a (1nnnoruov) OV .3sn aNVI ONI1si<3 1 3 NNVAOM v'N.. z 8 7 O 3 r I •V v CeMd3e e3a0vw3uva II_1 0< - \ b3ffi:U �wn o� $ g 'Ld n a ^ 900'26'39"E 614.82 0 1 f m € 8 I §I , 8 E o� a aH= .per WR k s k 'II o�' 3„W °=6 4R foa - vow c«p biaaC € Ill e'l ,3 eo S ¢� z m ?nz ''m 0co di co r _ _ -I co I 0) } g roc oz I 3 5,, u I ga 0 0 a_ MC 1 Z CO tli oo2 z + Z Ce O I 0w3 = v' __ I Mvd .OSL L J '8 I S0 8 I n of 8� 0 I ..:i b 0 'O py I I ?'�' a w w a E ):60 002 00 I n.!K�CNw QUn- grow I —.°4) � 4iionan z �00H o olW �a � �o 40 �NOJ �d_O z4, W IV wap OwLIJ I r-w ¢C trop 0. (.7 3 Qo aza c az oali oi�. z Z 2mH - 0. N.-N vi_i oCQ o�os, I -z <��0 1.11 Co Z rMIX,_p I n K O Z-I J ZI0 W 00 01 oz ZN I Oi CI Id UnO Z oao� cal a CU z z0z Cr M Egli _ li lf, ZQ —.,c y��, a 2 ow. z ` mo so 3,w O v o1�z '� m in U a z I o] m' co a p w a gV oo w5w - a-. a l z w,s1L2,0 zinj i w •• g ¢wa �; i₹ 'a7 a ,_ § g I W 8 'n impw 3c0 w i`a' : 2ggi 11 6w3 a • 3o c0 aO< 8 3,^. e.▪r?, r m; ogI -s� az z°n'5 k 8 g : I rqG • I _ b w egn �a n z< mn cm I Sae I E M - l7 O • o I I 3 w '▪a to OJ ,=- I I LcO" ^p OCCO o0 „ ,4l'Czs M„ft, 1Z.00N g z La ,„p I `�� zn or- w n o7 L , .a 2 e zo Z.° _,..ti,,2 , E J z O`O La, , V w 8 W N° p t V Z�� r`o n 0_ wwa Svti cn H �� a 'ym t0P o Cc w 00z ©'O_-u U' 1pa 0. 00�, a oLC c, rn CO aQ 4DN z �°5� NH Dam o F n w a IE ,� o Il m 11 a Lu N .' NV W 005 p g aw �� OE X05 gg um 6� rcw R: rD _ '.Q�v �4 ,� w ad w, `,"!.:',,2L u e 6U.n u,; 3n ¢o In `X Et p / w- z aapa 4. Onto 8nm o„ u3m pn . 0b v1O_r0 0 Fzo Cr lipp 90 / _ wpm _ _ --1-1 NLO 1,7 E2 a w i 1/4:- _2._ J y-- `rp,, 0) /IL) OI F p a v' 2 -1' <O (0 po 3 p tZ'ZL4 MSZ 9Z.00N z r b m �-- ro. - Ze Z9G M.tZ.92.00N L 0V0a A1N003 013M ,f L.949Z M„ft,9Z.OON I V a31aVfO 1S3MH1110S 31111 193M I I ONILIV32 30 SISVS (IvanfinOIuOv) V 2011 awl OnIIISIX3 9'oou wan tlw,,,,-, tmmJ-,xonvv..n\n.>\WA''m-aZGVu:axi".no m coz,,,vxi 91 Arc' WI Town of Mead P.O.Box 626 441 Third Street Mead^A Little Tow„ Mead,Colorado 80542-0626 With a Big Future" (970)535-4477 CERTIFIED MAIL # 7007 1490 0004 3519 1548 August 13, 2008 Weld County Board of Commissioners P.O. Box 758 Greeley, CO 80632 RE: Required Annexation Impact Report - Equinox Annexation to the Town of Mead. Gentlemen: In accordance with the requirements of C.R.S. § 31-12-108.5, enclosed is a copy of the Annexation Impact Report prepared for the proposed Equinox Annexation to the Town of Mead. You have received prior notice of the public hearings before the Planning Commission and the Board of Trustees for this proposal. In the event that you have any questions regarding this Annexation Impact Report, or the proposed annexation, you may contact Richard E. Samson, the Town's Attorney, at(303) 776-1169. Very truly yours, - 1(1)24atO— Candace Bridgwater Town Clerk • / Annexation Impact Report Equinox Annexation August 13, 2008 Prepared for: Town of Mead P.O. Box 626 Mead, CO 80542 r Table of Contents Page I. Project Description II. Municipal Services III. Special Districts IV. School District Impact V. Exhibits A. Existing Conditions Map and Proposed Land Use Map Forward: This "annexation impact report" has been prepared pursuant to Section 31-12-108.5 Colorado Revised Statutes, 1986 Repl. Vol. Contained in Appendix "A" is a map depicting the proposed annexation, the existing and proposed public services to the property and the existing and proposed land use for the property. I. Project Description: The property proposed for annexation consists of a single annexation of 77.3 acres and is located north of the Weingart annexation and east of WCR 7. The annexation is contiguous to the Town on its western, southern and eastern boundaries. It satisfies the 1/6 contiguity with the Town boundaries required by statute. The land proposed to be annexed is owned by Equinox Mead, LLC, 9055 E. Mineral Circle, #100, Centennial, CO 80112 and Rodney J. Schmidt, 1873 Blue Mountain Road, Longmont, CO 80504. This annexation will complete the backfilling of the area between Highway 66 (Weingart Annexation)and the Hunters Cove subdivision. A 1.75 acre parcel in separate ownership is exempted from the annexation. The land is currently zoned A (Agricultural) by Weld County. In conjunction with the proposed annexation, the zoning will change to a PUD containing residential and mixed-uses in conformance with the Town's Land Use Code. Adjacent land uses include agriculture, rural residences on large lots, and land proposed for urban density development. II. Municipal Services: Municipal services for the Equinox Annexation will be provided in the following manner: Electricity Electric services are to be provided by the present supplier, United Power Inc., the electric franchisee for the Town of Mead. Telephone U.S. West Communications Water Little Thompson Water District Sanitary Sewer Sewer service will be provided by the St. Vrain Sanitation District Fire The site is currently served by the Mountain View Fire Protection District. Police Weld County Sheriff, under contract with the Town of Mead. Street Maint. Maintenance of roadways within the annexation will be provided by the Town after construction to Town specifications and acceptance by the Board of Trustees. Financing the municipal services within the area to be annexed is addressed in an annexation agreement between the applicant and the Town of Mead. The annexation agreement is currently under negotiation and is not available at this time. III. Special Districts: The area to be annexed is included within the following special districts: St. Vrain Sanitation District St. Vrain Valley School District Mountain View Fire Protection District Northern Colorado Water Conservancy District St. Vrain - Left Hand Water Conservancy District Weld County Library District IV. School District Impact: It is anticipated that the annexation will bring a benefit to the St. Vrain School District RE1 J due to the increase in valuation, and will contribute 444 K-12 students to the school system. V. Exhibits: A. Existing Conditions Map and Proposed Land Use Map I �LK,.4 pI TO., : 1_ • I: 1 �',, MULLIGAN•\ RESERVOIR • !I, �;Ysa:.—. k et-° {.I •i is •. fL�•'' .....7... • E 'j e j '*nt. us%. . „,.•0Iw.� C ii 0 huxW USE •,...* ,..r"r PA•7 S21 i 2!• #�. (4 r£ .•>•71E01.'SF .•.rat-, I•y1. .�� s.cccn_r!+,..:.c•:w _ E .._::_'.. i ................. .....r....... b28 IE • i - n .SJi �1• Ili _ .:Jf'�'.1•' Fri.y.'• pjtT r-";,..: • ;I isPA-5 • j'' _. ! i AIMED USE 2 _ • •1 t t Ut v�' AIDED IISf 1r7"....... •` •• -, ,y-r.__= ,+y2• r Ee'l• 7-vr.owrv • wM_w t :: ^` Ig it - IE' 1 OPEN SPACE /" y .../�. o Town of Mead P.O.Box 626 441 Third Street Mead"A Little Town Mead,Colorado 80542-0626 With a Sig Future"" (970)535-4477 CERTIFIED MAIL#7007 1490 0004 3519 1265 August 13, 2008 Weld County Board of Commissioners P.O. Box 758 Greeley, CO 80632 RE: Notice of Public Hearing- Equinox Annexation Board of Trustees - 7:00 P.M., Monday, September 8, 2008. Gentlemen: Please be advised that a public hearing before the Mead Board of Trustees has been set to review and consider the annexation of the a portion of Section 22, Township 3 North, Range 68 West of the 6th P.M.. The property is owned by Equinox Mead, LLC, 9055 E. Mineral Circle,#100, Centennial, CO 80112 and Rodney J. Schmidt, 1873 Blue Mountain Road, Longmont, CO 80504 and is proposed to be developed with Mixed Use (including Commercial, Office, Retail, and Civic -48 acres at full build out) and Residential (61 acres) of land uses. In accordance with C.R.S. § 31-12-108 (2), this notice has been sent to the Board of County Commissioners and County Attorney for Weld County, and to each special district or school district having territory within the area to be annexed. Attached is a copy of the published public hearing notice, together with a copy of the adopted resolution of intent to annex and the applicant's petition for annexation. You have previously received copies of the"Letter of Intent"provided with the application, and maps of the property location and a "concept plan" for the development of the property. Copies of the full application, as well as the full- sized maps submitted with the application are available for review in the Mead Town Hall, 441 - 3rd Street, Mead, Colorado. Written comments may be sent to Dan Dean, Town Manager, Box 626, Mead, CO 80542. Very truly yours, Candace Bridgwater Town Clerk Notice to Co&Sp Dist SOT Hearing wpd 8/13/08 2:19 pm Equinox Annexation PA's 1 -6 PUD • PETITION FOR ANNEXATION TO: THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF MEAD, COLORADO: We, Rodney J. Schmidt and Mead Partners Operating Company, LLC (Schmidt/Debrine property) and Equinox Mead, LLC by George R. Hanlon, Manager of Mead Land Venture, LLC, Gene A. Osborne of Mead Land Venture, LLC, New Frontier Bank, and Tom Schmidgall (Schmidt/Hurt property)the undersigned landowner(s), in accordance with Colorado law, hereby petition the Town of Mead and its Board of Trustees for annexation to the Town of Mead of the following described unincorporated territory located in the County of Weld and State of Colorado, to-wit: See legal description in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. As part of this petition, your petitioner further states to the Board of Trustees of Mead, Colorado, that: 1. It is desirable and necessary that the territory described in Exhibit A be annexed to the Town of Mead. 2. The requirements of C.R.S. sections 31-12-104 and 31-12-105, as amended, exist or have been met in that: a. Not less than one-sixth of the perimeter of the area proposed to be annexed is contiguous with the Town of Mead or will be contiguous with the Town of Mead within such time as required by 31-12-104. b. A community of interest exists between the area proposed to be annexed and the Town of Mead. c. The area proposed to be annexed is urban or will be urbanized in the near future. d. The area proposed to be annexed is integrated with or is capable of being integrated with the Town of Mead. e. No land within the boundary of the territory proposed to be annexed which is held in identical ownership, whether consisting of one tract or parcel of real estate or two or more contiguous tracts or parcels of real estate, has been divided into separate parts or parcels without the written consent of the landowner or landowners thereof, unless such tracts or parcels were separated by a dedicated street, road or other public way. 1 f. No land within the boundary of the area proposed to be annexed which is held in identical ownership, comprises twenty acres or more, and which, together with the buildings and improvements situated thereon has an assessed value in excess of two hundred thousand dollars ($200,000.00) for ad valorem tax purposes for the year next preceding the annexation, has been included within the area proposed to be annexed without the written consent of the landowner or landowners. g. No annexation proceedings have been commenced for any portion of the territory proposed to be annexed for the annexation of such territory to another municipality. h. The annexation of the territory proposed to be annexed will not result in the detachment of area from any school district. i. The annexation of the territory proposed to be annexed will not have the effect of extending the boundary of the Town of Mead more than three miles in any direction from any point of the boundary of the Town of Mead in any one year. j. Prior to completion of the annexation of the territory proposed to be annexed, the Town of Mead will have in place a plan for that area, which generally describes the proposed: Location, character, and extent of streets, subways, bridges, waterways, waterfronts, parkways, playgrounds, squares, parks, aviation fields, other public ways, grounds, open spaces, public utilities, and terminals for water, light, sanitation,transportation, and power to be provided by the Town of Mead; and the proposed land uses for the area; such plan to be updated at least once annually. k. In establishing the boundary of the territory proposed to be annexed, if a portion of a platted street or alley is to be annexed, the entire width of the street or alley has been included within the territory to be annexed. The Town of Mead will not deny reasonable access to any landowners, owners of any easement, or the owners of any franchise adjoining any platted street or alley which is to be annexed to the Town of Mead but is not bounded on both sides by the Town of Mead. 3. The owners of more than fifty percent of the area proposed to be annexed, exclusive of dedicated streets and alleys, have signed this petition and hereby petition for annexation of such territory. 4. Accompanying this petition are four copies of an annexation map containing the information following: a. A written legal description of the boundaries of the area proposed to be annexed; 2 5. Upon the Annexation Ordinance becoming effective, all lands within the area proposed to be annexed will become subject to all ordinances, rules and regulations of the Town of Mead, except for general property taxes of the Town of Mead which shall become effective as the January 1 next ensuing. 6. The zoning classification (land use) requested for the area proposed to be annexed is Residential and Mixed Use in Performance District 3. WHEREFORE, the following petitioner respectfully requests that the Town of Mead, acting through its Board of Trustees, approve the annexation of the area proposed to be annexed. By this acknowledgment, the undersigned hereby certify that the above information is complete and true. (If the applicant is not the owner(s)of the subject property, the owner(s), mortgage and/or lienholder shall also sign the Application.) Rodney J.Schmid Owner. Date: 9 - Z o C) Rodney J. Schmidt STATE OF COLORADO) SS. COUNTY OF ( ticler) The foregoing stru rent was acknowledgeoi before me this q day of 20 O4 by oOurl-,, S. gen. M • otmurrrrrr i� >>\°�Op,VIS r,Ii,,� My commission expires: 2-11'4/20(0 r,• • R Y. Witness My hand and official seal. � Notary Public . r% G O_ PVOv Owner. Date: 5 -9 Z J /ATE D's, f 1G`\\'\�� Mead Partners Operating, LLC by Rodney J. Schmidt � STATE OF COLORADO) SS. COUNTY OF eSatkctLf-) The foregoings₹ ument was acknowledg before me this q day of �{ 20 ' by I'Y1A 7 Cc 1'1 rn t 00 �.�``��p,�\/Isrrrrurr,��,. My commission expires: q sdrp PRY Witness My hand and official seal. otary Public 0 zo /�rrrrr+�rr�tai f l t tOti�"�`� 3 Equinox Mead, Owner. Date: S-2g- 2,00 g Equinox Me , by George R. Hanlon, Jr., Manager of Equinox Mead Land Venture, LLC STATE OF COLORADO) ) SS. COUNTY OFAr � ) T' ,1� ) The foregoing instrurpent was acknpwledged before me this �-1 c/ day of H 20 by tf�Y'q CSC•+tanI ) ILY VINZ My commission expires: ID/J30l j(7 • OTARY PUBLIC t Witness My hand and official seal. SAT OF COLORADO Notary Public y °R""' 0/30/2010 Owner. �� f Date: 5028�c7$ Equinox Mead, LLC by Gene A. Osborne, Equinox Mead Lan d Venture, LLC STATE OF COLORADO) SS. COUNTY OFAr • ? ) The foregoing ins ment was acknowledged before me this day f •'•� eit +�•• -• •• 200 by ---7-rX]pL.A•0S �Y > OILY VINZ NOTARY PUBLIC ti My commission expires: b/.3D/10 �— TE OF CdUBLI 00 Witness My hand and official seal. M i was 10/30/2010 Notary Public tiern rte: Date: New Frontier Bank by STATE OF COLORADO) ) SS. COUNTY OF The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of _ 20 by My commission expires: Witness My hand and official seal. Notary Public 4 Equinox Mead, • Owner Date: S-Z9-20o g Equinox Mea , L by George R. Hanlon,Jr., Manager of Equinox Mead Land Venture, LLC STATE OF COLORADO) ) SS. COUNTY OFap zhct, ?A The foregoing instrument was ackr,Qwl dged before me this - U t"`'day of d i 20 by C7 f r -tJ c nlor i . J iLY VINZ My commission expires:ID/a)//O • �j�IOTAHY PUBLIC Witness My hand and official sea(. / AC OF COLORADO Notary Public .� 'Y • • = o/30t2ol o Owner: /k Date: 5(�23 o� Equinox Mead, LLC by Gene A.Osborne, Equinox Mead Land Venture, LLC STATE OF COLORADO) ) SS. COUNTY OF4 ) The foregoing inst,ument was acknowledged be�pre me this day 20O by 2]rTY"A- gbh: FLY VINZ NOTARYPUBLIC My commission expires: ID/..3D//O TE of COLORADO a��a Witness My hand and official seal. M I olre$ 10/30/2010 Notary Public i k1 .i9 aa: Date: 5133/4'4V New Frontier Bank by- STATE OF COLORADO) ) SS. COUNTY OFD/1—tel" ) The foregoing in ment was acknowwll dged before me this.3U day of 20j' by ,C,./ _,_y ,ZV • ; My commission expires: lv - Witness My hand and official seal. r,F prrBi 0' f ary Public s SHARON L. BA!',Ell X Owner: Date: -s�, 9lr Tom SVZ/M5 idgall STATE OF 69L-AR.SDO9ncs ) SS. COUNTY OF ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this }Dill day of �w�y 20 by � lAVt— My commission expires: Witness My hand and official seal.KEMIE L Mrwaiw, �,,� I Not ry Pu lic � 1344 Cit."1" Oillikels alpha se. �OAAI Applicant Applicant: Date: % /a8 Mead Development Group by Roger Hollard STATE OF COLORADO) SS. COUNTY OFArap(L The fo egoing ingrument was pcknowledged before me this _ day of Y VINZ 20 Uoby f iOC{�-- >< nIL"* N T Y PUBLIC �J STAT OF COLORADO My commission expires: Witness My hand and official seal. y Commission Expires 10/30/2010 Notary Pubic Landowner/Petitioner Date Signed Legal Description Mailing Address of Land Owned Rodney Schmidt 1873 Blue Mountain Road See Exhibit A Longmont, CO 80504 Mead Partners Operating Company, LLC See Exhibit A By Rodney J. Schmidt 1873 Blue Mountain Road Longmont,CO 80504 5 New Frontier Bank See Exhibit A Tom Schmidgall See Exhibit A Equinox Mead, LLC by George R. Hanlon,Jr., Manager of See Exhibit A Equinox Mead Land Venture, LLC 9055 East Mineral Circle, Suite 100, Centennial, CO 80112 Equinox Mead, LLC by Gene A.Osborne of Equinox Mead Land Venture, LLC See Exhibit A 9055 East Mineral Circle, Suite 100, Centennial, CO 80112 Mead Development Group by Roger Hollard -See Exhibit A 9055 East Mineral Circle, Suite 100, Centennial, CO 80112 AFFIDAVIT OF CIRCULATOR STATE OF COLORADO ) • ) ss. COUNTY OF ) , being first duly sworn upon oath, deposes and says that(he or she)was the circulator of this Petition for Annexation of lands to the Town of Mead, Colorado, consisting of[ j pages including this page and that each signature hereon was witnessed by your affiant and is the signature of the person whose name it purports to be. Circulator STATE OF COLORADO ) SS. COUNTY OF The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 200 by My commission expires: Witness My hand and official seal. Notary Public 6 MbTETRA TECH EXHIBIT A A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED IN THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH,RANGE 68 WEST OF THE 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN,TOWN OF MEAD, COUNTY OF WELD,STATE OF COLORADO BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE WEST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 22 WHENCE THE SOUTHWEST CORNER BEARS SOUTH 00°26'23" EAST 2648.73 FEET, SAID LINE FORMING THE BASIS OF BEARING FOR THIS LEGAL DESCRIPTION; THENCE NORTH 88°50'51" EAST 30 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY OF WELD COUNTY ROAD NO. 7 AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 22 NORTH 88°50'51" EAST 1185.50 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WESTERLY BOUNDARY OF MULLIGAN RESERVOIR; THENCE ALONG THE BOUNDARY OF SAID MULLIGAN RESERVOIR THE FOLLOWING 15 COURSES; SOUTH 15°09'21" EAST 283.80 FEET;THENCE SOUTH 22°38'20" EAST 191.40 FEET;THENCE SOUTH 45°12'21" EAST 151.80 FEET; THENCE NORTH 64°29'39" EAST 129.30 FEET; THENCE NORTH 37°40'39" EAST 154.50 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 82°23'21" EAST 110.90 FEET;THENCE SOUTH 48°31'21" EAST 126.40 FEET; THENCE SOUTH I5°25'21" EAST 197.70 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00°36'39" WEST 223.70 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 21°35'21" EAST 145.20 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 71°15'21" EAST 128.90 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 81°55'21" EAST 308.50 FEET;THENCE NORTH 67°28'39" EAST 175.20 FEET;THENCE NORTH 49°09'39" EAST 131.40 FEET; THENCE NORTH 23°17'39" EAST 192.26 FEET; THENCE NORTH 69°39'13" EAST 76.17 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT B OF RECORDED EXEMPTION NO. 1207-22-4-AMRE-2318; THENCE ALONG THE BOUNDARY OF SAID LOT B THE FOLLOWING THREE COURSES;THENCE SOUTH 01°09'47" EAST 575.55 FEET;THENCE SOUTH 88°49'54" WEST 318.27 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00°26'39" EAST 521.10 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF TRACT 2 OF WEINGARDT ESTATES; THENCE ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID TRACT 2 SOUTH 88°49'43" WEST 1076.97 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE EBERL AGRICULTURAL UNIT DEVELOPMENT; THENCE ALONG THE BOUNDARY LINE OF SAID EBERL AGRICULTURAL UNIT DEVELOPMENT THE FOLLOWING 2 COURSES; NORTH 00°26'23" WEST 303.71 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 88°49'55" WEST 1403.01 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF WELD COUNTY ROAD NO. 7; THENCE ALONG SAID LINE NORTH 00°26'23" WEST 475.78 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT A OF RECORDED EXEMPTION NO. 1207-22-3 RE3126; THENCE ALONG THE BOUNDARY OF SAID LOT A THE FOLLOWING 3 COURSES; THENCE NORTH 89°33'37" EAST 276.73 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00°23'23" WEST 255.26 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89°33'37" WEST 276.73 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EAST RIGHT-OF- WAY LINE OF WELD COUNTY ROAD NO. 7; THENCE ALONG SAID LINE NORTH 00°26'23" WEST 851.11 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. THE ABOVE DESCRIBED TRACT CONTAINS 77.300 ACRES MORE OR LESS. 1900 S.SUNSET STREET,SUITE I-F LONGMONT.CO 80501 TEL:303.772.5282 FAX 303.772.7039 www.tetratech.com NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING MEAD BOARD OF TRUSTEES EQUINOX ANNEXATION NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Board of Trustees of the Town of Mead has adopted a Resolution of Substantial Compliance initiating annexation proceedings for the "Equinox Annexation," said Annexation being more particularly described in the following Resolution No. 24-R-2008. The Board of Trustees of the Town of Mead will hold a Public Hearing commencing at 7:00 p.m., Monday, September 8, 2008, at the Mead Town Hall, 441 - 3rd Street, Mead, Colorado 80542, for the purpose of determining whether the property proposed to be annexed meet the applicable requirements of the statutes of the State of Colorado and is eligible for annexation to the Town of Mead, and to establish the appropriate land use for the property, if requested. Any person may appear at the Public Hearing and be heard regarding the matters under consideration. Copies of the petition and supporting material submitted to the Town are on file and available for public inspection in the Office of the Town Clerk, at the Mead Town Hall, 441 - 3r° Street, Mead, Colorado 80542. Dated this 29th day of July 2008. TOWN OF MEAD, COLORADO By: /s/Candace Bridgwater Town Clerk TOWN OF MEAD, COLORADO RESOLUTION NO. 24-R-2008 A RESOLUTION FINDING SUBSTANTIAL COMPLIANCE AND INITIATING ANNEXATION PROCEEDINGS FOR CERTAIN PROPERTIES IN WELD COUNTY, COLORADO TO THE TOWN OF MEAD, SAID ANNEXATION TO BE KNOWN AS THE EQUINOX ANNEXATION TO THE TOWN OF MEAD. WHEREAS, a written petition together with four (4) prints of annexation map for annexation of certain properties have been filed with the Board of Trustees of the Town of Mead by Equinox Mead, LLC, 9055 E. Mineral Circle, #100, Centennial, CO 80112 and Rodney J. Schmidt, 1873 Blue Mountain Road, Longmont, CO 80504 through the applicant's representative, Nuszer Kopatz, 1117 Cherokee St, Denver, CO 80204; and WHEREAS, the Board of Trustees has reviewed the petition and supporting material; and WHEREAS, the Board of Trustees wishes to permit simultaneous consideration of the subject property for annexation and zoning, if requested in the petition; and WHEREAS, the Board of Trustees has reviewed the petition and desires to adopt by Resolution its findings in regard to the petition; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF MEAD, COLORADO, as follows: Section 1. The petition, whose legal description is attached hereto as Exhibit A, and incorporated by reference herein, is accepted and determined to be in substantial compliance with the applicable laws of the State of Colorado. Section 2. No election is required under C.R.S. §31-12-107(2). Section 3. No additional terms and conditions are to be imposed except those provided for in the petitions. Section 4. The Board of Trustees will hold a public hearing for the purpose of determining if the proposed annexation complies with C.R.S. §31-12-104, and with C.R.S. §31-12- 105, and will hold a public hearing to determine the appropriate zoning of the subject properties if requested in the petition, at the Mead Town Hall, 441- 3`d Street, Mead, Colorado 80542, at the following time and date: 7:00 pm, Monday, September 8, 2008. Section 5. Any person may appear at such hearing and present evidence relative to the proposed annexation or the proposed zoning. Annex PH Notice BOT-Posting wpd ➢/16/08 11:58 am Page 2 of 5 Section 6. Upon completion of the hearing, the Board of Trustees shall set forth, by resolution, its findings and conclusions with reference to the eligibility of the proposed annexation, and whether the statutory requirements for the proposed annexation have been met, and further, will determine the appropriate zoning of the subject property if requested in the petition. Section 7. If the Board of Trustees concludes, by resolution, that all statutory requirements have been met and that the proposed annexation is proper under the laws of the State of Colorado, the Board of Trustees shall pass one or more ordinances annexing the subject property to the Town of Mead, and shall pass one or more ordinances zoning the subject property if requested in the petition. INTRODUCED, READ, PASSED, AND ADOPTED THIS 28th DAY OF July , 2008. ATTEST: TOWN OF MEAD By /s/Candace Bridgwater By /s/Richard W. Macomber Candace Bridgwater, Town Clerk Richard W. Macomber, Mayor Annex PH Notice ROT-Posting wpd 7/16/08 1158 am Page 3 of 5 EXHIBIT A EQUINOX ANNEXATION Legal Description: TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH,RANGE 68 WEST OF THE 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN,TOWN OF MEAD, COUNTY OF WELD, STATE OF COLORADO BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE WEST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 22 WHENCE THE SOUTHWEST CORNER BEARS SOUTH 00°26'23" EAST 2648.73 FEET, SAID LINE FORMING THE BASIS OF BEARING FOR THIS LEGAL DESCRIPTION; THENCE NORTH 88°50'51" EAST 30 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY OF WELD COUNTY ROAD NO. 7 AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 22 NORTH 88°50'51" EAST 1185.50 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WESTERLY BOUNDARY OF MULLIGAN RESERVOIR; THENCE ALONG THE BOUNDARY OF SAID MULLIGAN RESERVOIR THE FOLLOWING 15 COURSES; SOUTH 15°09'21" EAST 283.80 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 22°38'20" EAST 191.40 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 45°12'21" EAST 151.80 FEET; THENCE NORTH 64°29'39" EAST 129.30 FEET; THENCE NORTH 37°40'39" EAST 154.50 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 82°23'21" EAST 110.90 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 48°31'21" EAST 126.40 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 15°25'21" EAST 197.70 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00°36'39" WEST 223.70 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 21°35'21" EAST 145.20 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 71°15'21" EAST 128.90 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 81°55'21" EAST 308.50 FEET; THENCE NORTH 67°28'39" EAST 175.20 FEET; THENCE NORTH 49°09'39" EAST 131.40 FEET; THENCE NORTH 23°17'39" EAST 192.26 FEET; THENCE NORTH 69°39'13" FAST 76.17 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT B OF RECORDED EXEMPTION NO. 1207-22-4-AMRE-2318; THENCE ALONG THE BOUNDARY OF SAID LOT B THE FOLLOWING THREE COURSES;THENCE SOUTH 01°09'47" EAST 575.55 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 88°49'54" WEST 318.27 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00°26'39" EAST 521.10 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF TRACT 2 OF WEINGARDT ESTATES; THENCE ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID TRACT 2 SOUTH 88°49'43" WEST 1076.97 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE EBERL AGRICULTURAL UNIT DEVELOPMENT; THENCE ALONG THE BOUNDARY LINE OF SAID EBERL AGRICULTURAL UNIT DEVELOPMENT THE FOLLOWING 2 COURSES; NORTH 00°26'23" WEST 303.71 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 88°49'55" WEST 1403.01 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF WELD COUNTY ROAD NO. 7; THENCE ALONG SAID LINE NORTH 00°26'23" WEST 475.78 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT A OF RECORDED EXEMPTION NO. 1207-22-3 RE3126; THENCE ALONG THE BOUNDARY OF SAID LOT A THE FOLLOWING 3 COURSES; Annex PH Notice BOT-Posting wpd 7/16/08 11:58 am Page 4 of 5 THENCE NORTH 89°33'37" EAST 276.73 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00023'23" WEST 255.26 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89°33'37" WEST 276.73 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF WELD COUNTY ROAD NO. 7;THENCE ALONG SAID LINE NORTH 00°26'23" WEST 851.11 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. THE ABOVE DESCRIBED TRACT CONTAINS 77.300 ACRES MORE OR LESS. Annex PH Notice BOT-Posting.wpd 7/16/08 11'58 am Page 5 of 5 Hello