The URL can be used to link to this page

Browse Search

Home My WebLink About20081298.tiff Mile High Dairy • Manajiement Plan For Nuisance Control For Mile High Dairy Bangma 15333 WCR 5 Mead, CO 80504 Developed in accordance with Generally Accepted Agricultural Best Management Practices Prepared By • AG PRO AGPROfessionals, LLC 4350 Highway 66 Longmont, CO 80504 November 2007 • 2008-1298 Mile High Dairy AGPROfessionals,LLC • Introduction This supplemental Management Plan for Nuisance Control has been developed and implemented to identify methods that Mile High Dairy, will use to minimize the inherent conditions that exist in confinement feeding operations. This supplement outlines management practices generally acceptable and proven effective at minimizing nuisance conditions. Neither nuisance management nor this supplemental plan is required by Colorado State statute or specifically outlined in the Colorado Confined Animal Feeding Operations Control Regulations. This is a proactive measure to assist integration into local communities. Mile High Dairy will use these management and control practices, to their best and practical extent. Legal Owner, Contacts and Authorized Persons Correspondence and Contacts should be made to: Wes Bangma 15333 Weld County Road 5 Longmont, CO 80504 The individual(s) at this facility who is (are) responsible for developing the implementation; maintenance and revision of this supplemental plan are listed below. • Wes Bangma Owner (Name) (Title) (Name) (Title) Legal Description The confined animal feeding facility described in this NMP is located at: Part of the East Y= of Section 17, Township 3 north, Range 68 west of the 6th P.M. • 2 Mile High Dairy AGPROfessionals,LLC • Air Quality Air quality at and around confined animal feeding operations are affected primarily from the relationship of soil/manure and available moisture. The two primary air quality concerns at dairies are dust and odor. However, the management practices for dust or odor control are not inherently compatible. Wet pens and manure produce odor. Dry pens are dusty. The two paragraphs below outline the best management practices for the control of dust and odors that Mile High Dairy will use. The manager shall closely observe pen conditions and attempt to achieve a balance between proper dust and odor control. Dust Dust from pen surfaces is usually controlled by intensive management of the pen surface by routine cleaning and harrowing of the pen surface. The purpose of intensive surface management is twofold; to keep cattle clean and to reduce pest habitat. The best management systems for dust control involve moisture management. Management methods Mile High Dairy shall use to control dust are: 1. Pen density Moisture will be managed by varying stocking rates and pen densities. The animal's wet manure and urine keep the surface moist and control dust emissions. Stocking rates in will be managed to minimize dust. • 2. Regular manure removal Mile High Dairy will continue to conduct regular manure removal. Manure removal and pen maintenance will be conducted as needed. 3. Sprinkler systems Sprinkler systems, timed appropriately, are an effective method for keeping pen surfaces moist. Dairy cattle produce significant moisture through urine and feces. Pens surfaces are extensively maintained for cattle health. 4. Water Trucks Should nuisance dust conditions arise; water tanker trucks or portable sprinkling systems may be used for moisture control on pens and roadways to minimize nuisance dust conditions. Odor Odors result from the natural decomposition processes that start as soon as the manure is excreted and continue as long as any usable material remains as food for microorganisms living everywhere in soil, water and the manure. Odor strength depends on the kind of manure, and the conditions under which it decomposes. Although occasionally unpleasant, the odors are not dangerous to health in the quantities customarily notices around animal feeding operations and fields where manure is spread for fertilizer. S 3 Mile High Dairy AGPROfessionals,LLC • Mile High Dairy will use the methods and management practices listed below for odor control: 1. Establish good pen drainage Dry manure is less odorous than moist manure. The Dairy will conduct routine pen cleaning and surface harrowing to reduce standing water and dry or remove wet manure. 2. Regular manure removal Reduce the overall quantity of odor producing sources. The Dairy will conduct routine pen cleaning and harrowing several times per month. 3. Composting Reduces volume, nutrients and minimizes odor and pests. 4. Reduce standing water Standing water can increase microbial digestion and odor producing by-products. Proper pen maintenance and surface grading will be conducted by the Dairy to reduce standing water. The stormwater ponds will be dewatered regularly in accordance with the Manure and Wastewater Management Plan for Mile High Dairy. No chemical additives or treatments of the stormwater ponds for odor control are planned. Research to date indicates poor efficacy, if any, of these products. • 5. Land application timing Typically air rises in the morning and sinks in the evening. Mile High Dairy will consider weather conditions and prevailing wind direction to minimize odors from land application. If it is determined that nuisance dust and odor conditions persist, Mile High Dairy may increase the frequency of the respective management practices previously outline such as pen cleaning, surface grading and pen maintenance. Additionally, if nuisance conditions continue to persist beyond increased maintenance interval controls, Mile High Dairy will install physical or mechanical means such as living windbreaks and/or solid fences to further minimize nuisance conditions from dust and odors. Insects and rodents inhabit areas that 1) have an adequate to good food supply and 2) foster habitat prime for breeding and living. Key practices Mile High Dairy will use to manage insects and rodents are to first eliminate possible habitat and then reduce the available food supply. • 4 Mile High Dairy AGPROfessionals,LLC • Pest Control Insects and Rodents 1. Regular manure removal and composting Manure management removes both food sources and habitat 2. Reduce standing water Standing water is a primary breeding ground for insects 3. Minimize fly habitat Standing water, weeds and grass, manure stockpiles, etc., are all prime habitat for reproduction and protection. Reduce or eliminate these areas where practical. 4. Weeds and grass management Keep weeds and grassy areas to a minimum. These provide both protection and breeding areas. 5. Minimize stockpiles or storage of manure Stockpiles of manure provide both breeding and protective habitat. Keep stockpile use to a minimum. 6. Biological treatments Parasitic wasps are excellent biological fly control and are widely used. The wasps lay their eggs in fly larvae hindering fly reproduction. 7. Baits and chemical treatments Due to environmental and worker's safety concerns, chemical treatments are a last line of defense for insect control. Baits and treatments must be applied routinely. However, they are very effective. Rodent control at Mile High Dairy is best achieved by minimizing spillage of feedstuffs around the operation. Good housekeeping practices and regular feed bunk cleaning, site grading and maintenance are used to reduce feed sources. Rodent traps and chemical treatments are effective control methods and will be used as necessary. In the event it is determined nuisance conditions from pest such as flies and rodents persist, Mile High Dairy will initially increase the frequency of the housekeeping and management practices outlines previously. Iffurther action is necessary, Mile High Dairy will increase use of chemical controls and treatments, such as fly sprays, baits, and rodendicide for pest control. • 5 I Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment Nutrient Management Plan for USR • GENERAL INFORMATION: Name of Facility:_Mile High Dairy Facility Physical Location: 15333 WCR 5,Longmont,CO 80504 PRODUCTION AREA SECTION: A. STORAGE OF MANURE AND PROCESS WASTEWATER -61.17(8)(c)(i) The CAFO will ensure adequate storage of manure and process wastewater,including procedures to ensure proper operation and maintenance of the impoundments and tanks. The following procedures will be followed by the facility: (A) Except during the designed storm event,manure and process wastewater stored in impoundments and terminal tanks will be removed as necessary to maintain a minimum of two feet of freeboard,or Department-approved alternative freeboard. (B) Whenever the design capacity of impoundments and tanks is less than the volume required to store runoff from the 25-Year,24- Hour Storm,X Chronic Storm or 100-Year,24-Hour Storm the structures will be dewatered to a level that restores the required capacity once soils on a land application site have the water holding capacity to receive process wastewater. Process Wastewater Storage Information: 2. Total Capacity Required to 3. Total Capacity Required to I. Impoundment/Tank/Drainage Hold all Wastes Accumulated Contain Storm Event Runoff 4.Total Capacity Available(acre-feet) Basin ID During the Storage Period and Direct Precipitation (acre-feet) (acre-feet) Runoff pond 6.35 13.98 20 • Manure Storage Information: 2. Amount of Manure Produced 3. Total Amount of Non-pen Area Manure Storage I. Manure Storage Area ID (tons/year) Available(tons) Compost 41,592 tons, 86% moisture 95,759 tons, 86%moisture Check here X if excess manure is transferred to a third party. Check here 1 if manure is stockpiled in pen area. RECORDKEEPING REQUIREMENT: I)Documentation that except during the designed storm event,manure and process wastewater stored in impoundments and terminal tanks is removed as necessary to maintain a minimum of two(2)fed offreeboard,accept where the operator has requested and the Ag Program has approved an alternative freeboard level 2)Documentation that wheaevtr the available capacity of impoandmmfa and tanks is less than the volume required to store runoff from the designed storm event,the structures shall be dewatued to a level that restores the required capacity once soils on a land application site have the water holding capacity to receive process wastewater. B. MORTALITY MANAGEMENT—61.17(8)(c)(ii) The CAFO will ensure proper management of animal mortalities to ensure that they are not disposed of in a liquid manure,storm water,or process wastewater storage system that is not specifically designed to treat animal mortalities. Method of Animal Mortalities Handling(check all that are applicable): Composting X Rendering • Burial thr Other: RECORDKEEPIAG REQUIREMENT: 1)Documentation that ensures the proper management of animal mortalities to ensure that they are not disposed of in a liquid manure,storm water, or process wastewater storage system that is not specifically designed to treat animal mortalities. NMP for Mile High Dairy for USR 11/5/07 Page 1 of 5 s • C. CLEAN WATER DIVERSION—61.17(8)(c)(iii) • The CAFO will ensure that clean water resulting from the 25-Year,24-Hour Storm,X Chronic Storm or 100-Year,24-Hour Storm is diverted from the production area. Clean water diversions used(check all that are applicable): Location Used: X Berms Part of west side X Channels Ditch on north side Natural Topography _South,east and part of west Other RECORDKEEPING REQUIREMENT: 1)Documentation that clean water is diverted from the designed storm event from the production area D. PREVENTION OF DIRECT CONTACT OF ANIMALS WITH WATERS OF THE UNITED STATES—61.17(S)(c)(iv) The CAFO will prevent direct contact of confined animals with surface waters. Waters of the U.S.means,in part: a) All waters...susceptible to use in interstate or foreign commerce...; b) All interstate waters...; c) All other waters such as intrastate lakes,rivers,streams(including intermittent streams),mudflats,sandtats,wetlands'(including wetlands adjacent to waters identified in(a)through(e)of this definition),sloughs,prairie potholes,wet meadows,playa lakes,or natural ponds the use,degradation,or destruction of which would affect or could affect interstate or foreign commerce including any such waters: I) Which are or could be used by interstate or foreign travelers for recreational or other purposes; 2) From which fish or shellfish are or could be taken and sold in interstate or foreign commerce;or 3) Which are used or could be used for industrial purposes...; d) All impoundments of waters otherwise defined as waters of the United States under this definition';and e) Tributaries of waters identified in paragraphs(a)through(d)of this definition. Wetlands means those areas that are inundated or saturated by surface or groundwater at a frequency and duration sufficient to support,and that under normal circumstances do support,a prevalence of vegetation typically adapted for life in saturated soil conditions. h Waste treatment systems,including treatment ponds or lagoons designed to meet the requirements of C W A(other than cooling ponds as defined in 40 CFR 423.11(m)which also meet the criteria of this definition)are not waters of the United States. This exclusion applies only to manmade bodies • of water which neither were originally created in waters of the United States(such as disposal area in wetlands)nor resulted from the impoundment of waters of the United States. 1. Do waters of the U.S.flow throu: the,roduction area? 1 Yes X No 2. Do the animals have access to waters of the United States? ❑ Yes X No 3. If yes,list the measures used to prevent direct contact(e.g.fencing)of animals with waters of the United States: Animals are kept in corrals and freestalls that do not contact waters of the US RECORDKEEPING REQUIREMENT': 1)Documentation that them is prevention of direct contact of confined animals with waters of the United States. E. CHEMICAL AND OTHER CONTAMINANT HANDLING—61.17(8)(c)(v) The CAFO will ensure chemicals and other contaminants handled on-site are not disposed of in any manure,storm water,or process wastewater storage system unless specifically designed to treat such chemicals and other contaminants. Check all that are applicable: Chemicals are used and empty containers are disposed of in accordance with manufacturer's guidelines X Chemicals are not stored in a room with a floor drain that discharges outside X Where are chemicals stored: Shop X Storage is covered X Storage has secondary containment-fuel tanks Chemicals are stored in proper containers X Where are chemicals disposed:not in wastewater pond No chemicals are used at the facility I Other: RECORDKEEPING REQUIREMENT: I)Documentation that chemicals and other conmmiomts handled on-site are not disposed of in any mamas,storm water,or process wastewater storage system unless specifically designed to teat such chemicals and other contaminants. • NMP for Mile High Dairy for USR 11/5/07 Page 2 of 5 • LAND APPLICATION SECTION: • If manure or process wastewater will be applied to a land application site,check the box here and go to Part(F):X If neither manure nor process wastewater will be applied to a land application site or be transferred to a third party,check the box here and go to Part(M): If neither manure nor process wastewater will be applied to a land application site,but one or both will be transferred to a third party,check the box here and go to Part(G)then to Part(M): F. CONSERVATION PRACTICES—61.17(8)(c)(vi) The CAFO will identify and implement site-specific conservation practices to control runoff of pollutants to surface water. I. Conservation Practices for Land Application Sites Please indicate where any of the following best management practices are being implemented to control runoff of pollutants to surface water: Conservation Practice: Land Application Site ID Where Practice is Implemented(for land application sites where surface water is located in or down-gradient of the site): Buffer Setback West pivot is greater than 100 feet from borrow ditch Conservation Tillage Constructed Wetland Infiltration Field Grass Filter Terrace Tail Water Pit Process wastewater is not allowed to reach end of field Other(describe): 2. The facility will also implement the following conservation practices: (A) Solid manure will be incorporated as soon as possible after application,unless the application site has perennial vegetation or is no-tilled • cropped,or except where the nutrient management plan adequately demonstrates that surface water quality will be protected where manure is not so incorporated. (B) Process wastewater to furrow-or flood-irrigated land application sites will be applied in a manner that prevents any process wastewater runoff into surface waters. (C) When process wastewater is sprinkler-applied,the soil water holding capacity of the soil will not be exceeded. (D) Process wastewater will not be applied to either frozen or flooded(i.e.,saturated)land application sites. (E) Manure or process wastewater will not be land-applied within 150 feet of domestic water supply wells,and within 300 feet of community domestic water supply wells. RECORDKEEPING REQUIREMENT: 1)DocumeMetion that alto-specific ctmeavationpracticea have been idmtifed end implemented to control nmoff afpollutanta to surface watt. C. SAMPLING&TESTING OF MANURE,PROCESS WASTEWATER,AND SOIL—61.17(8)(c)(vii)(and associated parts of a CAFO permit( The CAFO will identify protocols for appropriate sampling and testing of manure,process wastewater,and soil. Manure Process Wastewater Soil Frequency of X Annually X Annually For nitrate-As often as necessary to meet the Sampling: (If analyses are conducted (If analyses are conducted application rate calculation requirements: more frequently than more frequently than (indicate frequency)_yearly annually,the analyses must annually,the analyses must For phosphorus—minimum of once every 5 years or as be kept on-site for 5 years.) be kept on-site for 5 years.) necessary to meet the transport risk assessment requirements Analyzed for: Total Nitrogen,Ammonia(as Total Nitrogen,Ammonia Nitrate-to necessary depth zone(s); N),Nitrate(as N),and Total (as N),Nitrate(as N),and Phosphorus—top one-foot Phosphorus Total Phosphorus _ Sampling X CSU Cooperative X CSUCE 568 A X CSUCE 568 A Protocol Used: Extension(CE)568 A Other CSUCE Publication (please cite): Adjacent State CE Publication (please cite): Testing Protocol ❑ CSUCE X USEPA Method X "Methods of Soil Analysis,Part 3,Chemical Used: X Adjacent State CE Department-approved Methods" • (please cite):Olsen Lab, Method(requested m _: Department-approved Method(requested in MDA certified writing) writing) NMP for Mile High Dairy for USR 11/5/07 Page 3 of 5 • H. NUTRIENT BUDGET INFORMATION—61.17(8)(c)(x)(A)(Vl) • Nutrient Budget Information: Crop: Manure and Process Wastewater Application Rate Description of Method(calculation/table)to be Used: Calculated: KSU Bulletin MF-2227 Triticale silage and CSUCE Published Fertilizer Suggestions pasture X Adjacent State CE-Published Fertilizer Suggestions [(yield goal(lbs/a DM))*(0.04)*(1.0)]-(7.2 x ppm NO3- CNMP Method that meets USDA-NRCS standards N(24 in))—(30 x%OM)—previous manure application CO NRCS NMP guidelines credit-plow down legume credit • Department-approved Method Bulletin 568A Sorghum silage and X CSUCE Published Fertilizer Suggestions pasture Adjacent State CE-Published Fertilizer Suggestions [9 x yield goal(t/a)]-[8 x ppm soil NO3-N(ave 2 ft)]—[30 x CNMP Method that meets USDA-NRCS standards %OM]-previous manure application credits-plow down CO NRCS NMP guidelines legume credit Department-approved Method Bulletin 568A Corn silage X CSUCE Published Fertilizer Suggestions - Adjacent State CE-Published Fertilizer Suggestions 35+[7.5 x yield goal(t/a)]- [8 x ppm soil NO,-N(ave 2 ft)] -. CNMP Method that meets USDA-NRCS standards -[yield goal x 0.85 x%OM]-previous manure application CO NRCS NMP guidelines credits-plow down legume credit Department-approved Method Soil publication#0.565 Alfalfa X CSUCE Published Fertilizer Suggestions Adjacent State CE-Published Fertilizer Suggestions [yield(lbs/a)x(%protein/6.25)x(0.6 soil type CNMP Method that meets USDA-NRCS standards adjustment)]/0.66 efficiency factor-(3.6 x ppm NO3-N(24 CO NRCS NMP guidelines in))—(30 x%OM)—previous manure application credit Department-approved Method • CSU Do-it-Yourself Nutrient Management Plan Dryland Millet X CSUCE Published Fertilizer Suggestions I Adjacent State CE-Published Fertilizer Suggestions See Table. Up to 40 lbs N/A—(30 x%OM) previous -CNMP Method that meets USDA-NRCS standards manure application credit CO NRCS NMP guidelines I Department-approved Method CSU Do-it-Yourself Nutrient Management Plan Small Grain X CSUCE Published Fertilizer Suggestions ❑ Adjacent State CE-Published Fertilizer Suggestions See Table. Recommended N—(30 x%OM)—previous 'J CNMP Method that meets USDA-NRCS standards manure application credit CO NRCS NMP guidelines ▪ Department-approved Method Describe how realistic yield goals will be determined: Ave values for area until a 5 year average is established. Then 5 year average plus 5%except where drought,under-fertilization,or catastrophic event reduces yield. RECORDKEEPING REQUIREMENT: 1)Documentation of the identification of protocols for appropriate sampling and testing of manure,process wastewater,and soil. • NMP for Mile High Dairy for USR 11/5/07 Page 4 of 5 • • I. LAND APPLICATION—61.17(8)(c)(viii) • The CAFO will establish protocols to land apply manure or process wastewater in accordance with site specific nutrient management practices that ensure appropriate agricultural utilization of the nutrients in the manure or process wastewater. The facility will implement the following protocols: (A) No application of manure or process wastewater will be made to a land application site at a rate that will exceed the capacity of the soil and the planned crops to assimilate nitrate-nitrogen within 12 months of the manure or process wastewater being applied. (B) Manure and process wastewater shall be applied as uniformly as possible with properly calibrated equipment. I) Method(s)of manure application?_spreader truck 2) Method(s)of process wastewater application?_pivot and flood 3) Is nutrient application equipment calibrated at least annually? X Yes No RECORDKEEPLVG REQUIREMENT: 1)Documentation that protocols have been established for land application of manure or process wastewater in accordance with site- specific nutrient management practices that ensue appropriate agricultural utilization of the nutrients in the manure or process wastewater. J. PHOSPHORUS AND NITROGEN TRANSPORT—61.17(8)(c)(x)(A) Not applicable K. INSPECT LAND APPLICATION EQUIPMENT—61.17(8)(c)(x)(C) The CAFO will periodically inspect equipment used for land application of manure or process wastewater for leaks. The facility will inspect land application equipment at the following frequencies: (I) Annually(within the six month period prior to the first application of manure or process wastewater);and (2) At least once daily when process wastewater is being applied L. SETBACK REQUIREMENTS—61.17(8)(c)(x)(D) The CAFO will not apply manure and process wastewater: • (I) Closer than 100 feet to any down-gradient surface waters,open tile line intake structures,sinkholes,agricultural wellheads,or other conduits to surface waters unless one of the following is implemented: (11) 35-foot vegetated buffer to any down-gradient water of the U.S.,open tile intake structures,sinkholes, agricultural wellheads,or other conduits to waters of the U.S.where applications of manure,litter,or process wastewater are prohibited. (III) Alternative compliance practices to the 100-foot setback with prior approval of the Department. Please describe: Compliance Practice Implemented Land Application Site ID Where )(1), (II)or(lll)above(: Practice is Implemented: Down-gradient Surface Waters I West pivot Open Tile Line Intake Structure None Sinkholes None Agricultural Wellheads None Other Conduits to Surface Waters None M. CERTIFICATION STATEMENT I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system,or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information,the information submitted is to the best of my knowledge and belief true,accurate and complete. 1 am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information,including the possibility offine and imprisonment for knowing violations. A. NAME AND OFFICIAL TITLE(PRINT OR TYPE) B. PHONE NUMBER ( ) C. SIGNATURE D. DATE SIGNED • NMP for Mile High Dairy for USR 11/5/07 Page 5 of 5 • • Mile High Dairy I ICD • Table 4: Solid Manure Produced and Associated Nutrients ASAE D384.1-Dec 2001 Moisture Manure Manure TS VS Nitrogen Prosphorus Potassiur Number of Wt./hd, (lbs./day/ (ft3/day/ (lbs./day/ (lbs./day/ (lbs./day/ (lbs./day/ (lbs./da1 Animal Type Hd lbs. Total Wt.,lbs. (%) 1000#) 1000# 1000#) 1000#) 1000#) 1000#) 1000#) Milk Cows 1340 1500 2,010,000 86.0 86.0 1.40 12.0 10.0 0.45 0.094 0.2 Dry Cows 325 1,200 390,000 86.0 86.0 1.40 12.0 10.0 0.45 0.094 0.2 Springers 175 1,000 175,000 86.0 86.0 1.40 12.0 10.0 0.45 0.094 0.2 Heifers 100 750 75,000 86.0 86.0 1.40 12.0 10.0 0.45 0.094 0.2 Totals 1,940 2,650,000 Total Daily Production 227,900 3,710 31,800 26,500 1,193 249 7E Total Annual Production 83,183,500 1,354,150 11,607,000 9,672,500 435,263 90,922 280,50 Manure produced w/moisture content of 86.0% 41592 tons Manure to apply w/moisture content of 46.0% 10,783 tons Compost produced w/moisture content of 40.0% 9,705 tons • • AGPRO 11 LAN DPRO 1 of 1 • • Mile High Dairy USR • Land Application Requirements for 25-year, 24-hour Storm Event 25-year,24-hour storm volume( A.F.), gallons - Total Nitrogen contained in liquid, lbs. - `Total-N= 4.0 lbs./1,000 gal Ammonium-Nitrogen contained in liquid, lbs. - `NH3-N= 2.0 lbs./1,000 gal Organic-Nitrogen contained in liquid, lbs. Organic-N= 2.0 lbs./1,000 gal Ammonium-Nitrogen available after irrigation, lbs. - 45.0% Sprinkler-Irrigation loss` Organic-Nitrogen available 3rd year, lbs. - 42% Equilibrium mineralization rate for organic-N` Nitrogen available to plants(PAN)yr.after yr., lbs. - Soil Organic Matter, % 1.0 Irrigation Water NO3 content, ppm 5.0 Residual NO3 in soil, ppm 12.0 Alfalfa Corn Silage Expected Yield(grain, Bu/acre;silage,tons/acre) 6 25 Based on CSU Extension N req.w/listed O.M., soil N, & Irr.Water NO3,(lb./acre) 192 85 Bulletin#538&#0.565 Acres req. if effluent applied via sprinkler irrigation - - `Taken from CSU's Bulletin No. 568A Best Management Practices for Manure Utilization **Taken from AGPROfessional's records of average manure values given similar management Land Application Requirements for 10-year, 10-day Storm Event Maximum pumping requirement( 14.0 A.F.),gallons 4,555,087 Total Nitrogen contained in liquid, lbs. 12,435 "Total-N= 2.7 lbs./1,000 gal Ammonium-Nitrogen contained in liquid, lbs. 7,015 "NH3-N= 1.5 lbs./1,000 gal Organic-Nitrogen contained in liquid, lbs. 5,421 Organic-N= 1.2 lbs./1,000 gal Ammonium-Nitrogen available after irrigation, lbs. 3,858 45.0% Sprinkler-Irrigation loss` Organic-Nitrogen available 3rd year, lbs. 2,277 42% Equilibrium mineralization rate for organicN* Oitrogen available to plants(PAN)yr.after yr., lbs. 6,135 Soil Organic Matter, % 1.0 Irrigation Water NO3 content, ppm 5.0 Residual NO3 in soil(ave 2 ft), ppm 10.0 Alfalfa Corn Silage Expected Yield(grain, Bu/acre;silage,tons/acre) 6 25 Based on CSU Extension N req.w/listed O.M.,soil N, & Irr.Water NO3,(lb./acre) 185 101 Bulletin#538&#0.565 Acres req. if effluent applied via sprinkler irrigation 33 61 `Taken from CSU's Bulletin No. 568A Best Management Practices for Manure Utilization **Taken from AGPROfessional's records of average manure values given similar management of scraping fresh manure Land Application Requirements for Average Years' Stormwater&Process Water Maximum pumping requirement( 25.0 A.F.),gallons 8,145,720 Total Nitrogen contained in liquid, lbs. 22,238 "Total-N= 2.7 lbs./1,000 gal Ammonium-Nitrogen contained in liquid, lbs. 12,544 "NH3-N= 1.5 lbs./1,000 gal Organic-Nitrogen contained in liquid, lbs. 9,693 Organic-N= 1.2 lbs./1,000 gal Ammonium-Nitrogen available after irrigation, lbs. 6,899 45.0% Sprinkler-Irrigation loss` Organic-Nitrogen available 3rd year, lbs. 4,071 42% Equilibrium mineralization rate for organicN* Nitrogen available to plants(PAN)yr.after yr., lbs. 10,971 Soil Organic Matter, % 1.0 Irrigation Water NO3 content, ppm 5.0 Residual NO3 in soil(ave 2 ft), ppm 10.0 Alfalfa Corn Silage Expected Yield(grain, Bu/acre; silage or grass,tons/acre) 6 25 Based on CSU Extension N req.w/listed O.M.,soil N,& Irr.Water NO3, (lb./acre) 185 101 Bulletin#538&#0.565 Acres req. if effluent applied via sprinkler irrigation 59 109 `Taken from CSU's Bulletin No. 568A Best Management Practices for Manure Utilization •*Taken from AGPROfessional's records of average manure values given similar management of scraping fresh manure AGPRO 11 LAN DPRO 1 of 1 • w8'—c �,= I 0 3 d' em 8.fie 888^cTi ry o y¢ a ¢ 1- 6 ��`o `�,e 8i i ≥-5E 0 a�"N � m K � O 000m�f "�i si�o 0 O E E g N q urj n q o o 0 o itiE m m o O 3aJc'ory > a ._ _ m dE 12 o 0 p ¢ p u NIPS La N t,1 J 1 F ° O O O,-U3 r r r b .- o o < y So ('n o gy ti o w a C 72 065 L" H 'N O A .3 LL O m ° c0 8888888888O88 8 p 4 ,£m O 0 0 G 0 ¢ z a ¢ j r: 2 d O v g g }Q{g g yQ{ m o m MI g W Z p� 03�' � 888888888S 8 0 � °i m p K .. o c 'r E 0 b' � Q 0 ' 0000 • > fl- 0 = == = x ._ cq K M 0 > E 0 rcR tO Re e� .5_. rn_ Q �� N Bnn��v� � d cn o a 5 IL oa6inmdm T � 0, 000� •- n 8 8O r �= W 2 2 y 00 to i .. P .. _. _. p t K_ o m o u J .8� CQ c o "in2 R?R8228Ei8�8,B 8 0 5 w �` a o a)? et. N 8 . )imav'co"ia04. 4 pn ac E EO w � o a m 0 O c g l _ "E O Y 2 g t $o- Ca�2 na' nn R a n 0 "' g a e co 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 E n g a N a a a p die", (0ao b 0 bm bm.o CO mm CO d, b 4 ❑ Sm 8 m 8 Pa S S P-S mS 'WOJnV leWnIOA $ ! '-a¢ 000000000000 • 'Si N.¢w CV w � � 334 � � � � aa Pd 'Z 6 �J< 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O G• Q a c g N a^ c c ;e c c o W R'c 4 RE w ille Hato. - 5i88; = 0.8; o 0c 8888 8 "' ",<4:�'.3 8 ••ii8 E m a >V w.m-o m rn o n N Mg o W o cc too. S w in �� p gg oo .- o ' 0 06 O ri �< n $ LL re m C W ti 3 ` I .: 5 §Iii'', i§iiEA . 0g8Hi ci 8 oe r ya' dd " H Z $' B 0°00. 00000 WQ cc ¢> 5 <> o $ c O 30 g' in ` m ,5 = ov 8 ` c 8 c Goe 1- co Q2 88 c c b �' gi2 i- Q p 'Rec 2„ �o*d N woo 7- oo O O aal-al oe: "' 8C c J 'aSd =- NC of 6 c 12 ✓ l_J ^w 8. 0 ' 888888888888 80 ; m 53 Tri -5 HIQt a' ffiL craw Q`= � .o C.) Iz LE = N¢KO O O te _ € H_ r _ _ ,S T♦'. c v 11 �� g H C J p O N al O"8 .' `'[T o 5 Z C7) 2 2 W O 'L g W d v ni V4. c 1y a 00 > s3 X590008 ` 000 0o r O0N 8ry 48r ! E O .tae c 2 c c c Q o a r d .0 0 s O E co,,c1g-a = _= s € �� _ c O Y a8e3 $ E PJm y = 0 0 s a z a .� .s S tE 88 A� N88 o o �08 6 • d, d, r O o 0 o o 0 w R al o u L G 0 $ m_ q _ _ Oc Cc = a ' 7, 622 aaa` € `� .00�08oa—. a- .8 g 7m Sc-,8a "'SI, Q ••••' � n n c 2' o c - -a- coobo ob 000d r d'W ti• °� d m m g o g. w "o W N m c m Q _.e o E Eli c g c = 5 m y o 0 m e c 3 � w. _a m 2 '° g s �n � =aa � 518are ..29 TeX .2r' EMIR S 4 ggc2� un E0ariaicC T = Ec Old��N y 2, in 1381 .24` c d" 2 �N� t y -0" ca` a Q E O VU� ¢ L •• K C3 S� (3 . a LT$ = � � J d _ _ m1I N H . 9�S a 2 g o • 2 U 2Q 8u a O: � � ¢'�b' zd ,_ o ¢en ¢' K ti U W CC • • Hello