Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20082013.tiff SUMMARY OF THE WELD COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Tuesday, July 15, 2008 A regular meeting of the Weld County Planning Commission was held in the Southwest Weld County Conference Room, 4209 CR 24.5, Longmont, Colorado. The meeting was called to order by Chair, Doug Ochsner, at 1:30 p.m. ROLL CALL ABSENT Doug Ochsner-Chair Tom Holton -Vice Chair Nick Berryman Paul Branham Erich Ehrlich Robert Grand Bill Hall Mark Lawley Roy Spitzer Also Present: Michelle Martin, Department of Planning Services; Dave Snyder, Department of Public Works; Lauren Light, Department of Health; Cyndy Giauque, County Attorney (via phone), and Kris Ranslem, Secretary. Robert Grand moved to approve the June 17, 2008 Weld County Planning Commission minutes,seconded by Nick Berryman. Motion carried. The Chair read the case into record. CASE NUMBER: PZ-1079 APPLICANT: Schrage Living Trust PLANNER: Michelle Martin LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot B of RE-4042, being part of the E2 NE4 of Section 6,T4N, R68W of the 6th P.M.,Weld County, Colorado. REQUEST: Change of Zone from A(Agricultural)to Planned Unit Development with Estate uses for five(5)residential lots and 7.7 acres of common open space(Schrage PUD). LOCATION: South of and adjacent to State Highway 60 and west of CR 3. The Chair asked if there was anyone in the audience who wished to speak for or against this application. No one wished to speak. The Chair asked Michelle Martin, Department of Planning Services, if she wishes for this case to remain on the Consent Agenda. Ms. Martin replied yes. The Chair asked the applicant if they wish for this to remain on Consent as well. The applicant indicated that they do wish for this to remain on Consent. Commissioner Grand referred to the letter that Ms. Martin handed out and asked if there was a concern from Magpie on what they voiced. Ms. Martin said that in a phone conversation that she had with them today,they indicated in previous emails that they wanted to work with Mr. Schrage on the construction documents for the road going to the oil and gas facilities and they wanted a more formalized agreement at this point. Mr. Schrage has indicated that he is willing to work on a formalized agreement with them and if that doesn't get done before the Board of County Commissioners hearing,we will then add it as a condition of approval. Ms. Martin added that at this point in time they are working towards that agreement. Mr. Grand clarified that it wasn't an issue and Ms. Martin replied no. Tom Holton moved that Case PZ-1079 be forwarded to the Board of County Commissioners along with the � Conditions of Approval and Development Standards with the Planning Commission's recommendation of /t aL t1 U cl— �-al-3118 2008-2013 approval, seconded by Erich Ehrlich. Motion carried unanimously. The Chair asked the public if they wished to make any comments. No one wished to speak. The Chair asked the Commissioners if there was any new business they wish to discuss. Commissioner Lawley referred to the Oil and Gas Company involved in the last case and asked Ms. Martin how their concerns go into a condition of approval. Ms. Martin commented that if they don't have a formalized agreement established by the time of the Board of County Commissioners hearing, at that hearing we can request that prior to recording the plat the applicant have that agreement established. Mr. Lawley expressed concern for the landowner as it can be rather restrictive for the applicant to obtain this type of agreement. Ms. Martin commented that in this case the agreement deals with the construction of the access road. She added that Magpie has indicated in earlier emails that they are okay with the development; however, they are just concerned with how the access will be built. Mr. Lawley clarified that his concern is in general with it being restrictive for the landowner to get that agreement. Ms. Martin agreed that a Surface Use Agreement can be restrictive. She added that if the applicant and the oil and gas company do not reach an agreement,the Planning Department would take it back for reconsideration of that one condition and then the Board of County Commissioners would hear both sides and make a determination at that point. Meeting adjourned at 1:38 p.m. Respectfully submitted, LIS/Whitt' aka- Kristine Ranslem Secretary Hello