The URL can be used to link to this page

Browse Search

Home My WebLink About20082139.tiff Town of Mead P.O.Box 626 441 Third Street Mead"A time Town Mead,Colorado 80542-0626 With a Big Future" (970)535-4477 CERTIFIED MAIL#7007 1490 0004 3518 9064 July 29, 2008 Weld County Board of Commissioners P.O. Box 758 Greeley, CO 80632 RE: Request for Comments and Recommendations on the Annexation of"High Point at Mead." Gentlemen: Enclosed is a copy of the application, annexation maps and other supporting material for the proposed annexation of"High Point at Mead" to the Town of Mead. This property is located in Weld County on approximately 600 acres at the northwest corner of WCR 38 and 1-25. The proposed development will consist of approximately 1,036 single family medium density units and 400 multi-family high density units. WCR 9 YZ will act as a buffer separating the residential community from the commercial land uses. The land use to the west of WCR 9 %2 and along 1-25 will incorporate approximately 61 acres of commercial as well as 82 acres of mixed use development dedicated for commercial and light industrial use. The proposed development will be the first in the area, but will accurately depict the Town of Mead Comprehensive Plan. The existing adjacent land owners consist of low density homes surrounded by agricultural land. Future development to the south will create similar proposed land uses and create continuity between the Town of Mead and the proposed Site. Future development east of the Site is shown on the comprehensive plan as low density residential. The purpose of this referral is to obtain the comments and recommendations of various governmental agencies and service providers as to the appropriateness of the annexation. Your comments are welcome and will assist the Board of Trustees and Planning Commission in their review of the proposal. We ask that your comments reach us no later than August 15. We ask that you forward your response directly to Samson, Pipis & Marsh, LLC, do Gary West, P.O. Box 1079, Longmont, CO 80502. Thank you for your cooperation and assistance. Very truly rs, Candace Bridgwat Town Clerk 0 � �y 7L,1 c— t�1 . ft / I�1� Referal Notiice.wppdd7/29/08 3'.28 pm c 6 Ck 2008-2139 Town of Mead P.O.Box 626 441 Third Street Mead"A Lime Tom Mead,Colorado 80542-0626 With a Big FuWrt" (970)535-4477 July 31, 2008 Weld County Board of Commissioners P.O. Box 758 Greeley, CO 80632 RE: Correction of Location for the Annexation of"High Point at Mead." Gentlemen: In the referral packet you received earlier this week, the location of the High Point at Mead Annexation was inadvertently referenced as the northwest corner of WCR 38 and I-25. As you have probably discovered, the correct location is the northeast corner of WCR 38 and I-25. We apologize for the error and any confusion it may have caused you. Thank you for your cooperation and assistance. Very truly rs, CaLn+dQacce�Bridgwat Town Clerk Application for Annexation High Point at Mead Mead, Colorado Submittal Date: May, 2008 Resubmitted Date: July, 2008 Prepared for: ath of Growth Partners, Ltd. & - and 389 Partners, Ltd. 5953 Dallas Parkway, Suite 200-A Plano, TX 75093 Prepared by: CH2M HILL, Inc. 9191 South Jamaica Street Englewood, CO 80112-5946 11 n a *W •f. � . .. r x � * q � a y /w r <. M • 45s, t 1 • a • Annexation Application Mead, Colorado High Point at Mead Submittal date: May, 2008 Resubmitted:July,2008 Table of Contents I. Professional Qualifications/Resumes II. Annexation Documents 1. Conceptual Plan Application and Decision Record (D-2) 2. Fiscal Impact Analysis (D-4) 3. Agreement for Payment of Review Expenses (D-5) • 4. Annexation Base Fees 4.1. Application Fee -Annexation 4.2. Application Fee -Concept Plan 4.3. Engineering Plans Check Fee 4.4. Cash Deposit for Reimbursement of Town's Cost 5. Letter of Intent 6. Annexation Petition 6.1. Annexation Petition 6.1.1. Signatures of Landowners 6.1.2. Mailing Address of Each Signer 6.1.3. Legal Description of Land Owned 6.1.4. Date of Signature Signing 6.2. Affidavit of Circulator 7. Proof of Ownership 8. Mailing List of Adjacent Property Owners 9. Envelopes for Mailing Notices and Referrals 10. Annexation Maps 10.1. Annexation Map Certificate 10.2. Annexation Map 10.3. Annexation Map (3 Mylar Originals)1 10.4. Annexation Map Land Surveying Standards Checklist 10.5. Annexation Map (AutoCAD file)2 • t All Mylar originals are included in separate cover 2 All electronic tiles are included in Section IV • 10.6. Legal Description (word processing file)2 11. Northern Colorado Water Conservancy District Petition 12. Warranty Deed for Non-tributary Water Rights 13. Annexation Impact Report 13.1. Annexation Impact Report (word processing file)2 13.2. Annexation Impact Report Map (AutoCAD file)2 14. Concept Plan 14.1. Concept Plan 14.2. Concept Plan (1 Mylar Original)1 14.3. Concept Plan (AutoCAD file)2 III. Annexation/Development Information 1. Preliminary Soils Report 2. Preliminary Utility Report 3. Water Rights Report 4. Ecological Survey 5. Preliminary Traffic Report 6. Statement of Community Need 7. Statement of School Impact 8. Development Impact Assessment Statements 8.1. Water 8.2. Sewer • 8.3. Natural Gas 8.4. Electric 8.5. Telephone 8.6. Streets 8.7. Drainage 8.8. Law Enforcement 8.9. Fire Protection 8.10. Parks and Recreation 8.11. Environmental Considerations 8.12. Economic Development Potential 9. Will Serve Letters 10. Development Compatibility Statements 10.1. Street Master Plan 10.2. Subdivision Plan 10.3. Comprehensive Plan 10.4. Land Use Code 10.5. Existing and Adjacent Land Use 11. Preliminary Drainage Report IV. Electronic Files 1 All Mylar originals are included in separate cover • 2 All electronic files are included in Section IV • Bonner Gilmore Senior Project Manager Program Management Education Bachelor of Science Civil Engineering Distinguishing Qualifications • Master Planning,visioning,entitlement, architectural and civil coordination and construction management experience for master planned developments and mixed use communities. • Management of heavy civil construction including highways,landfills,lakes,dams,levees,bridges, water transmission lines, lift stations,pump stations,water tanks and golf courses. Relevant Experience Mr. Gilmore is a Program Management Senior Project Manager with the Land Development group in CI 12M HILL's Denver office. He has more than 13 years experience in various aspects of development and construction and has worked on multiple long term projects as construction superintendent,project manager and development manager. Representative Projects Master Planned Mixed Use Communities Sun City Roseville, Roseville CA 1,200 acre active adult community including 27 holes of golf,more than 1,900 homes and amenities such as a 50,000 S.F. recreation center,tennis courts,bocce ball courts and miles of walking trails. Sun City Lincoln Hills,Lincoln CA 3,400 acre mixed use development with 36 holes of golf,more than 6,800 homes,400,00 S.F. of retail/commercial space and amenities including two recreation centers totaling 110,000 S.F., tennis courts, bocce ball courts,soft ball field, and improved open space with more than 20 miles of walking trails. Anthem Colorado, Broomfield,CO 2,750 acre mixed use development with more than 3,500 homes, 806 acres of improved open space (passive and active recreation included), and in excess of 4,000,000 S.F. of retail, commercial and office park. Heavy Civil Construction Six miles of highway relocation for the Federal Highway Administration—Dobbins,CA I lighway 193 relocation for Cal Trans—Lincoln,CA State I lighway 7 widening—Broomfield,CO Four cell expansion for Yolo County Landfill -Davis, CA Siena Reservoir—Broomfield, CO State certified Siena Dam—Broomfield, CO 16 miles of FEMA approved levee construction adjacent to the Sacramento River—Sacramento, CA Single span bridge within State Highway 20—Dobbins, CA Single span bridge—Broomfield, CA Four miles of 30" spiral welded water transmission line—Lincoln, CA • Two miles of 28" mortar lined,spiral welded water transmission line—Broomfield, CO • 4.5 i1V1GD lift station—Broomfield, CO 1.5 MGD irrigation pump station—Lincoln,CA Five million gallon concrete water storage tank—Lincoln,CA 27 holes of a Greg Nash championship golf course—Lincoln,CA • • • Joshua S. Hooper, PE Project Manager—Land Development Education B.S.,Civil Engineering,University of Colorado Distinguishing Qualifications • Civil infrastructure design for master planned communities and residential subdivisions • Site civil design for commercial and mixed-use developments • Entitlement strategy and coordination for master planned communities, mixed use developments and urban infill redevelopments Professional Registrations Registered Professional Engineer,State of Colorado#39335 Relevant Experience Mr.Hooper is a civil engineer and project manager with the land development group in CH2M I IILL's Denver office. He has 9 years of regional experience in civil engineering design and has worked on all phases of land development projects including due diligence studies for land acquisition,concept planning,entitlement coordination, final design,construction document preparation,permitting and construction oversight. Representative Projects Liberty,Ada County,Idaho (2007-current)—2,000 acre master planned community near Boise,Idaho • currently in early stages of entitlement strategizing with preliminary planning and engineering. Palisade Park,Broomfield,Colorado (2007-2008) -160 acre mixed-use development consisting of regional drainage infrastructure,offsite utility coordination and onfite gas surface use agreement assistance. The Children's Hospital North Campus,Broomfield,Colorado (2007)—Ambulatory surgery center site civil design within the Palisade Park development. Park Highlands,North Las Vegas,Nevada (2006-2007)-2,600 acre master planned community being developed by Olympia Group. Involved in the early stages of civil engineering design. Anthem Colorado, Broomfield,Colorado (2004-2006)-3,000 acre Pulte/Del Webb master planned community including a large active adult component. Completed numerous subdivisions,gas pipeline relocation,and master utility and drainage design. Prairie Center,Brighton, Colorado (2003-2005)-270 acre retail power center including anchor stores Home Depot and Super Target. Assisted in civil design related to irrigation ditch relocation, master drainage and utilities. jack Kerouac Lofts,Denver,Colorado (2002-2003)—Residential loft building in the Prospect Neighborhood of lower downtown Denver. Brighton Crossing,Brighton, CO (2000-2001)-630 acre master planned community by Carma Developers. Involved in master drainage design and utility coordination. • Professional Organizations/Affiliations Urban Land Institute (ULI) - Member • Timothy Siedlecki Project Manager Planning and Urban Design Education B.S. Landscape Architecture,The Ohio State University Distinguishing Qualifications • Community planning,program development and visioning experience for master planned communities and resort residential communities. • Landscape architecture design of master planned community and resort residential infrastructure project management experience,including roadways,parks and open space,community facilities and recreation centers. Relevant Experience Mr. Siedlecki is a Planning and Urban Design Project Manager with Land Development in CIl2M I IILL's Denver office. He has 10 years experience in various aspects of land planning and community visioning including site analysis, program and design development, cost estimating and municipal entitlement coordination. Representative Projects Community Planning and Landscape Architecture Bromley 1lighlands,Brighton, CO Liberty, Ada County ID 411 Bayshorc, Longmont, CO Anthem Colorado, Broomfield, CO Palmilla, I.a Quinta, CA Codorniz, La Quinta, CA Fieldstone at Tallyn's Reach,Aurora,CO Autumn Lake, Madison,WI Community Amenities and Landscape Architecture Desert Mountain,Scottsdale AZ Saguaro Forest Cochise Geronimo Village of Seven Arrows Lone Mountain Interlocken Advance Environment Technology,Broomfield,CO Tallyn's Reach,Aurora, CO Architectural Bridge Enhancements Anthem Colorado, Broomfield,CO Desert Mountain,Scottsdale AZ Professional Affiliations American Society of Landscape Architects International Council of Shopping Centers Urban Land Institute • JACQUELINE A. DOWDS BENNETT, P.E. SENIOR TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER, CH2MHILL • Education design volumes. Conducted intersection analyses. MS/Engineering/1993 Recommended roadway and intersection BS/Civil Engineering/ 1991 improvements. Wrote Access Control Plan for segment of SH 7 adjacent to development. Professional Registration and Museum of Nature and Science Parking Garage Memberships (Denver,CO)—Analyzed the effect of the additional Professional Engineer/CO,WY volume generated by the parking garage on the adjacent street network. Estimated turning movement Distinguishing Qualifications volumes and analyzed intersection level of service for • Broad range of experience across all facets of existing and projected conditions during weekday and transportation planning and traffic design weekend peak and non-peak periods. • Experience with using travel demand model output Aurora Sports Park(Aurora,CO) Developed trip and performing post-model adjustments as necessary generation/distribution to determine volume flows internal and external to site. Used volumes to analyze • Effective communicator experienced in working with and design adjacent signalized intersections. Obtained others and helping groups reach consensus an access permit for the intersections. Experience Summary Valmont Road Widening(Boulder, CO)— Determined optimal lane configurations for arterial Fifteen years of experience leading and conducting and intersections. Work included analyzing options to multimodal transportation planning, traffic impact eliminate cut-through traffic, signal interconnection studies, corridor studies, traffic signal design, with a railroad crossing,provisions for bike facilities, construction traffic control and phasing design, signing and signal design. and striping design, and interchange feasibility studies. SH 14 Frontage Road (Fort Collins, CO) • Traffic Impact Study Experience Conducted an analysis to determine optimal Colorado Springs Airport Business Park (Colorado intersection reconfiguration. Work included data Springs,CO)—Analyzed the effect of a proposed collection, accident analysis, preliminary design and development adjacent to the airport terminal. cost estimate of alternatives, and recommendation for Developed trip generation/distribution to determine improvement. Extensive involvement with business flows internal and external to the site. Assisted with owners and residents was required to produce a travel demand modeling to forecast 2030 daily and solution that was sensitive to access issues and peak hour volumes for study area. Determined design agreeable to all parties. volumes from 2030 forecast and trip generation Lennox Development(Richardson,TX)— process. Conducted intersection and interchange Developed trip generation/distribution to determine analyses. Recommended roadway,intersection, and volume flows internal and external to site. Used interchange improvements to accommodate volumes to analyze and design adjacent signalized development volumes. Provided volume input to the intersections and roadway improvements. air quality analysis process. Yellowstone National Park(WY)—Collected and Marksheffel Road Corridor Study(Colorado analyzed traffic data to determine levels of service for Springs, CO) - Managed the traffic planning aspects junctions and road segments for existing and future of this study. Work included projecting volumes with conditions. Analyzed accidents and recommended the regional travel demand model and recommending improvements for high accident locations. lane configurations for this roadway widening project. Worked with PPACG staff to obtain concurrence on the volume projections. State Highway 7 Improvements(Thornton, CO)— Analyzed the effect of a proposed development on SH 7. Developed trip generation/distribution to all determine volume flows internal and external to site and forecasted background traffic growth to determine • Brett W. Schlanger Project Engineer—Land Development Education B.S., Civil Engineering, University of New Hampshire,2005 Distinguishing Qualifications • Civil infrastructure design for master planned communities and residential subdivisions • Site civil design for commercial and mixed-use developments Professional Registrations Certified Engineer In Training(Eli) Relevant Experience Mr. Schlanger has been working in the land development industry for over 2.5 years and is currently working as a project engineer in the CH2M HILL's Denver office. He has worked on various assignments with land development projects including master drainage studies,construction document preparation, site grading, utility design and roadway design. Representative Projects and Dates of Involvement Palisade Park, Broomfield, Colorado (2007-current) —160 acre mixed-use development consisting of regional drainage infrastructure and utilities currently under construction The Children's Hospital North Campus, Broomfield,Colorado (2007) — Ambulatory surgery center within the Palisade Park development. Park Highlands, North Las Vegas,Nevada (2006-2007) -A 2,600 acre master planned community being developed by Olympia Group. Springfield Airport, Springfield Missouri (2006)—Drainage analysis and design for the proposed tarmac and surrounding areas. • WESTERN ENVIRONMENT Lys EQOLOGZ 'NG • GREG D. SHERMAN, P.G. President PROFESSIONAL CAPABILITIES: Mr. Sherman has more than 33 years of professional experience. He is currently President of WESTERN E 1ltR,ONMENT AND ECOLOGY, INC. Prior to his current position, he was the Principal Geologist/Project Director with Roy F. Weston in its Lakewood, Colorado office. Duties performed in these capacities involved responsibility for CERCLA RIIFS studies and RCRA investigations. His professional assignments include project management and technical direction of the design and installation of the 2,000-foot long the 881 Hillside Groundwater Interception trench at the Rocky Flats Nuclear Weapons Plant in Jefferson County, Colorado. Mr. Sherman was Field Operations Manager for the installation of 75 groundwater extraction wells and vapor extraction and sparging points. This work was completed on the Stanford Research Park Superfund site in Palo Alto, California. Recently, he has concentrated on VOC remediation system design and installation utilizing on-site re-injection of treated groundwater and enhanced oxygenation systems. Mr. Sherman was lead investigator for the City of Wheat Ridge regarding the characterization of the Jay Street Park. This project, which was submitted to the Colorado Voluntary Clean-Up Program, received a grant from the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment for innovative use of a Brownsfields site. Mr. Sherman and Western Environment and Ecology, Inc. was selected by the Cities of Aurora and Lakewood as their approved USEPA Brownsfields contractor. Mr. Sherman is past Chairman of the Rocky Mountain Section of the Association of Engineering Geologists. He has served as Chairman of Executive Enterprises Seminars on Sampling and Data Analysis. He has extensive experience in geotechnical and geological investigations, groundwater studies, UST testing and evaluation, construction materials testing and mineral resource evaluation. Mr. Sherman is recognized in the region as one of the leading experts in underground storage tank management and mine subsidence. He has placed special emphasis on the • application of geophysical techniques to environmental and geotechnical investigations. Clients 22!17 WEST POWERS AVENUE LITTLETON, COLORADO &012,0 PHONE (303)7,30-345,2 - FA= (303)730-3461 WWW.WESTERNENVTifozusitp'O]t • for these projects range from Federal, state and local governments to private industry and commercial developments. The project types included petroleum distribution facilities, nuclear power plants, highways and streets, dams and reservoirs, transmission lines, sewage treatment plants and sewage systems, hazardous and industrial waste disposal areas, and mining facilities, as well as residential and commercial developments. Mr. Sherman has performed geotechnical and geological investigations in Alaska, Arizona, California, Colorado, Idaho, Illinois, Montana, New Mexico, New York, Nevada, North Dakota, South Dakota, Texas, Utah and Wyoming. Additionally, he has international evaluation experience in the Middle East, Central America and Mexico. REGISTRATION/CERTIFICATION Wyoming Professional Geologist#2296 Indiana Certified Geologist#786 Certified Professional Geologist, CPG#6586 • Petro Tite Training Course, 1986 40-Hour OSHA Training Course, 1987 8-Hour OSHA Supervisor Course, 1987 Nuclear Density Gauge Operation and Safety Training Course, 1984 NRC Quality Assurance Training, 1978 Asbestos Inspector, 1996 EXPERIENCE Western Environment and Ecology, Inc., Littleton, Colorado; President, 1994. SEACOR, Inc., Lakewood, Colorado; Principal Scientist, 1992-1993. Roy F. Weston, Inc., Lakewood, Colorado; Principal Geologist, 1990-1992. ATEC Associates, Inc., Denver, Colorado; Environmental Division Manager, 1985-1990. Tierra Consultants, Inc., Denver, Colorado; President, 1982-1985. Apache Energy and Minerals, Denver, Colorado; Senior Project Geologist, 1979-1982. • • Dames and Moore, Denver, Colorado; Project Geologist, 1977-1979. Resource Associates of Alaska, Fairbanks, Alaska; Staff Geologist, 1976. Uranerez U.S.A., Inc., Casper, Wyoming; Staff Geologist, 1975-1976. Amoco Production Company, Denver, Colorado; Lab Technician, 1974. Cities Service Company, Durango, Colorado; Field Technician, 1973. EDUCATION B.S., Geology, University of Northern Colorado, 1975 Graduate Studies, New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology, 1977 AWARDS Rocky Mountain Associate of Geologists, Outstanding Senior, 1975 Who's Who in the West, 1988 Colorado Wildlife Federation, 1996 Conservationist of the Year (Owl Mountain Partnership) • PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATIONS Association of Engineering Geologists American Institute of Professional Geologists Senior Scientist Colca Canyon Scientific Expedition, 1990 Colorado School of Mines, Non-facility Senior Design Team Advisor PUBLICATIONS/PRESENTATIONS Greg D. Sherman and Brian R. Partington., "Abandoned Mine Subsidence Prediction Using British National Coal Board Methods, Boulder/Weld Coal Field, Denver, Colorado"Proceedings if the International Association of Engineering Geologists, 2006 Meeting Nottingham, England. September 2006. Sherman, Greg D., "Sampling and Data Analysis"; Executive Enterprises Seminar, Chairman, May 1992. Sherman, Greg D., "Statistical Design of Sampling Plans"; Executive Enterprises Seminar, June 1990. • • Sherman, Greg D., "Impact of the EPA UST Regulations"; Tri-State Petroleum Marketer, December 1988. Sherman, Greg D., "Variables Effecting Volumetric Leak Detection Methods for Underground Storage Tanks"; Paper given to the Colorado Section, American Society of Civil Engineers, 1988. Sherman, Greg D., "The Impact of Underground Storage Tank Regulations on Industry"; Extended Abstracts, American Institute of Chemical Engineers, National Meeting, 1988. Sherman, Greg D., "Assessment of Subsidence Damage to Existing Structures in Louisville, Lafayette, Colorado"; Proceedings of the Colorado Governor's Conference on Subsidence, 1985. Sherman, Greg D., "Geology and Mining History of the Boulder/Weld Coal Field"; Paper given at Denver Coal Club Meeting, 1985. Sherman, Greg D., "The New Mexico Gold Belt Regional Structural Implications"; Proceedings of the Western Mining Association, 1982 Convention. Sherman, Greg D., "Colorado Front Range Uranium Deposits, A Possible Origin": in review. • Sherman, Greg D., "Origin of Monoclinal Folding Near Livermore, Colorado"; Mountain Geologist, April 1976. • t- Serkan Sengul, P.E. Project Manager EDUCATION Masters in Engineering, Civil Engineering, University of Colorado at Denver, In-progress Bachelors of Science, Civil Engineering, University of Colorado at Boulder Geo-Denver 2007, Denver. Colorado Design and Repair Guidelines For Shallow Foundations On Expansive Soils, Denver, CO, National Association of Wastewater Transporters(NAWT)Training Program, Boulder, CO, Colorado Public Health Association, 5151 Annual Education Conference, Vail, Colorado, Geo-Frontiers Conference, Austin, Texas Construction QC/QA for Geosynthetic Installations, Austin, Texas Building on Expansive and Collapsible Soils, Denver, Colorado Post Tensioning Institute Technical Conference, Denver, Colorado Design of Post-Tensioned Slab-on-Ground Technical Short-Course, Denver, Colorado GEO3: GEO Construction, Quality Assurance/Quality Control Technical Conference, Dallas, TX PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATIONS and CERTIFICATIONS . . P.E. — Professional Engineer—Colorado NICET Level II—Asphalt, Concrete, Soils ACI Certified; Level I Troxler Nuclear Safety Certification OSHA 40-Hour HAZWOPER Training Member—Colorado Association of Geotechnical Engineers(CAGE) • Member—Colorado Professionals in Onsite Wastewater(CPOW) Member—American Society of Civil Engineers(ASCE) Member—Post Tensioning Institute (PTI) Member-The International Association of Foundation Drilling (ADSC) Member—Colorado Environmental Health Association (CEHA) EXPERIENCE . • Geotechnical engineering including project coordination and planning, data analysis and final report preparation for geotechnical investigations of roadways, bridges, commercial buildings, residential developments, drainage systems, retaining systems, and septic systems. These investigations included deep borings, coring, downhole/crosshole seismic testing and crosshole sonic logging, responsible for overseeing and performing quality control, quality assurance and project management services. Field testing and observation including soils testing (field and laboratory), drilled pier observation. concrete testing (field and laboratory), structural masonry testing and observation, asphalt field testing, post-tension cable placement and elongation observation testing and reinforcing steel observation. . PROJECT EXPERIENCE • The Spire High-Rise, Denver HDTV Transmitter Tower and Facility, Golden Glasshouse Residential Towers, Denver Applewood Senior Living Facility, Lakewood Union Station Redevelopment, Denver Lakota Park Development, Winter Park 411° Dahlia Pond 1, Commerce City Grand Elk Ranch and Club, Granby Arrowhead Develoevelo pment, Winter Park Grand Park Development, Fraser GROUND ENGINEERING CONSULTRNT5 Y Flatirons, Inc. • Surveying, Engineering& Geomatics 3825 Iris Avenue, Ste 100 Boulder, CO 80301 JOHN B. GUYTON, PLS 303-443-7001 jbguyton@flatsurv.com SUMMARY OF QUALIFICATIONS Registered Land Surveyor with 37 years of professional experience in Surveying and Mapping. Work environments include: public and private sector projects, Hazwoper sites, construction layout, subdivision infrastructure, office and field, rural and urban. Also held leadership roles ranging from Project Manager to President and Principal Surveyor. Specific areas of expertise include: • Management of projects for timely& • Expert CounseUExpert Witness for cost effective completion cases involving boundary law • Speaker at Real Estate Seminars • Knowledgeable in Land Law • Colorado PLS 16406 • OSHA 40 hr qualified(CFR 1910.120) • Arizona RLS 17249 • Cost Estimating • Wyoming LS 4919 • Nevada RLS 8268 • California LS 5545 • President, Professional Land Surveyors • of Colorado, Inc. PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE Flatirons,Inc., Surveying,Engineering and Geomatics 1986—Present Boulder, CO Chairman & Chief Executive Officer Supervise field and office personnel,prepare estimates/project scope documents, boundary analysis, ensure effective communication with client and timely completion of projects for a private company contracting to municipalities, governments, and private clients. Achievements Counselor to the Colorado Attorney General's Office regarding questions on professional standards for registered surveyors and law pertaining to boundary surveys. Contributor to the state licensing examination process for Land Surveyor certification and to legislation regarding monumentation and plat recordation. Expert witness in court cases involving boundary and title disputes. Knowledgeable in Land Law. Testimony to the State Legislature regarding Senate Bill 87. Speaker at Half Moon Colorado Real Estate Titles&Title Insurance Seminar, 1997. I • Selected by the Survey Quorum as a panel member monitoring activities of registrants under review by the State Board of Registration for Professional Engineers and • Professional Surveyors, 1988 - 1998 and 2002. Court appointed Boundary Commissioner for multiple court cases. Colorado representative,National Council of Engineering Examiners. Speaker at GIS In The Rockies Conference, 2002. Speaker at Lorman Real Estate Descriptions and Survey Review Seminar, 2005. Instructor,"Boundary Disputes: Resolving Client Conflict," National Business Institute, Denver, 2007. Worked with State Senator Abel Tapia and State Representative Jim Ken on the passage of House Bill 1225 concerning land surveys and met with Governor Bill Ritter for fmal signing, 2007. Education Bachelor of Arts, History Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado Surveying&Mapping Degree Brinker School of Surveying&Mapping, Denver, CO Associates Degree, Surveying &Mapping Red Rocks Community College,Denver, CO Memberships • Western Federation of Professional Surveyors, Colorado Representative Professional Land Surveyors of Colorado, Inc.,President Colorado Section, American Congress on Surveying and Mapping, Past President GIS in the Rockies Conference,Board Member Publications "Letter to the membership in support of the Metro State Surveying Program", Side Shots, Journal of the PLSC, February 1993. Flatirons Surveying, Inc. informational brochure, "What Kind of Survey Do I Need?" Flatirons, Inc. website,www.Flatsurv.com PLSC informational pamphlet, "When you need a Land Survey." Quarterly "Letter from the President",Side Shots, Journal of the PLSC "Beware the ILC Survey",Denver Business Journal, July 22-28,2005. "Drainage System Design Critically Important for Projects," The Book of Experts, Boulder County Business Report, 2005. "Professional Land Surveyors of Colorado -Making a Difference through Standards of Care, Ethics, and Education,"Side Shots, May, 2006. "Property Line Agreements Do Not Constitute Subdivisions of Land Subject to Review By Local Authorities," Guyton&Bristow,Side Shots, May 2006. "Curative Statutes and Doctrines to Correct Title Irregularities,"PLSC Fall Technical Program, Colorado School of Mines, 2006. "Will GIS Do Away with the Need for Land Surveys?" The Book of Experts, Boulder County Business Report, 2007. • "Legal Principles of Boundary Conflict Resolution,"Annual Meeting, Central Colorado Professional Surveyors, 2008 • TOWN OF MEAD LAND USE CODE FORM D-2 ANNEXATION AND CONCEPTUAL PLAN APPLICATION Applicable Section(s): Copies Required: A. Conceptual Plan Submission Requii' ments. 1. Applicant's name, address and telephone number: HD Path of Growth Partners, Ltd. & 1-25 and 389 Partners, Ltd., c/o CH2M HILL, Inc. 9191 South Jamaica Street Englewood, Colorado 80112 (303) 771-0900 2. Legal description of the property proposed for the land use change: PROPERTY DESCRIPTION THE WEST HALF OF SECTION 35 AND THE SOUTHERLY 30 FEET OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 26, TOWNSHIP 4 NORTH, RANGE 68 WEST OF THE 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN AND THE NORTHERLY :30 FEET OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 2, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 68 WEST OF THE 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, WELD COUNTY, COLORADO. LESS AND EXCEPT PARCELS DESCRIBED AT RECEPTION NO. 1505381, AT BOOK 1041, PAGE 278 AND AT BOOK 1528, PAGE 526, RECORDED AT THE WELD COUNTY CLERK & RECORDER'S OFFICE. AND ALSO THE EAST HALF OF SECTION 35 AND THE SOUTHERLY 30 FEET OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 26, TOWNSHIP 4 NORTH, RANGE 68 WEST OF THE 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN AND THE NORTHERLY 30 FEET OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 2, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 68 WEST OF THE 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, WELD COUNTY, COLORADO. LESS AND EXCEPT THE EASTERLY 30 FEET OF THE EAST HALF OF SAID SECTION 35, THE EASTERLY 30 FEET OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 2, THE EASTERLY 30 FEET OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 2 AND A PARCEL DESCRIBED AT RECEPTION NO. 02204895, RECORDED AT THE AT THE WELD COUNTY CLERK & RECORDER'S OFFICE. CONTAINING 26,206,407 SQUARE FEET, (601.616 ACRES), MORE OR LESS, TOGETHER WITH AND SUBJECT 11 ALL EASEMENTS AND RIGHT OF WAYS EXISTING AND/OR OF PUBLIC RECORD. 3. Proposed land use change locred in Mead Performance District No. 1 4. Give a brief nonlegal description of the existing land use of the site and of the general character of the use of adjacent lands. • . HIGH POINT AT MEAD-D•2 FORM LUC DOC 1/13/07(4'.05 r r: 1 of 6 • Agricultural 5. Give a brief nonlegal description of the proposed land use change including the number of living units, type of home occupation proposed, the placement of a mobile home, etc. Single Family & Multi-Family Residential. Commercial, Open Space, Mixed Use Development If the proposed land use change involves the annexation of land, the applicant must submit a petition and supporting documents in the form prescribed by C.R.S. 31-12-101, et seq. In addition, the applicant shall post a bond or other security as required by Section 16-20-40 of the Mead Municipal Code. 6. Provide a sketch plan of the proposed land use change, including a site analysis consisting of a map, plot plan or diagram showing the total acreage, abutting landowners and land uses, streets, highways, utilities that will service the proposed development; and major physical features, including drainage and the location of natural hazards. [attach maps and sketches as necessary] 7. A master development plan, if the land use change is proposed to be constructed in stages requiring separate reviews and approvals. 8. Provide an elevation drawing of the proposed structure(s) showing height and describing the exterior materials. [attach drawings as necessary] 9. The fiscal impact analysis, Form D-4, • 10. Provide other information that the applicant believes will assist the Planning Commission and the Board of Trustees in making a fair decision. [attach additional sheets as necessary] Please see the Letter of Intent and the detailed narrative statements and reports provided with the annexation application. • HIGH POINT AT MEAD-D-2 FORM LUC DOC 1/13/07(4 05 Prr 2 of 6 • 11. Signature of the Applicant: By this acknowledgment, the undersigned hereby certify that the above information is complete and true. (If the applicant is riot the owner(s) of the subject property, the owner(s), mortgage and/or lienholder shall also sign the Application.) [ �-.� Owner: 41-� C �r,��. �ti��1 Date: f'� -c Benson Armistead, Director of Asset Management HD Path of Growth Partners, Ltd. By HDC Partners GP, LLC, general partner i Owner Date: Benson Armistead, Director of Asset Management 1-25 and 389 Partners, Ltd. by Prosperia Land Partners Ill, LLC, eneral partner Applicant: / Date: s /?J (attach additional sign ores as necessary) STATE OF TEXAS ) SS. COUNTY OF COLLIN) The fog instrument wa acknowledged before me this I 3 day of emu'( , 20 (3t My commission expires: 411,(1 Witness han a d of' ial seal. � MLAPEYY0N ►#';40 MY COMMON WIRES Notary Public U -3 Ap12q,9012 STATE OF TEXAS ) SS. COUNTY OF COLLIN) 3 14 The foregoing instrument was ac nowledged before me this day of N\ca , 20 O by So eMS ` My commission expires: '4(40`I — Witn f�Qyfia and fic al seal { JIEyT0N e..JC ( ''�l+ • MY COMMISSION EXPIRES Notary Public U � g0.2012 • HIGH POINT AT MEAD-D-2 FORM LUC.DOC 1f13/07(4.05 pmt 3 of 6 • ""`******"""APPLICANT NOT TO WRITE BELOW THIS LINE""******,.«...... B. Review Agency Comments. 1. Building Official: 2. Town Engineer: 3. Town Attorney: 4. Other Referrals: C. Further information requested, if any: D. Action by the Planning Commission: 1. The application is complete. Yes n No Li 2. The application is for a Major Land Use Change. Yes❑ No❑ 3. The requirements of the Mead Land Use Code have been satisfied. Yes❑ No Si 4. If the application is for the annexation of property, has the annexation question been submitted to,and approved by the electorate? Yes❑ No • 5. The application is: El approved ❑disapproved ❑approved with the following conditions: a) b) c) (attach additional conditions as necessary) DONE by the Mead Planning Commission of Mead, Colorado, this_day of , 20_. ATTEST: Secretary to the Commission Chairman E. Action by the Board of Trustees. • HIGH POINT AT MEAD O-2 FORM LUC DOC 1/13/07(9 O5 CT 4 of 6 • 1. The application is complete. Yes No n 2. The application is for a Major Land Use Change. Yes❑ No❑ 3. The requirements of the Mead Land Use Code have been satisfied. Yes❑No❑ 4. The application is: Li approved ❑disapproved r3 approved with the following conditions: a) b) c) (attach additional conditions as necessary) • • HIGH POINT AT MEAD•D-2 FORM LUC DOC 1/13/07;4.05 pa.' 5 of 6 • DONE by the Mead Board of Trustees of Mead, Colorado, this_day of , 20_ ATTEST: Town Clerk Mayor • • HIGH POINT AT MEAD-0-2 FORM LUC DOC 1113/07 14 05 pm 6 of 6 TOWN OF MEAD LAND USE CODE FORM D-4 FISCAL ANALYSIS (Required for all Preliminary and Final Applications) (for Major Land Use Changes) Applicable Section(s): Copies Required: Applicant's name, address and telephone number: HD Path of Growth Partners,Ltd. & 1-25 and 389 Partners,Ltd., c/o CH2M HILL, Inc. 9191 South Jamaica Street Englewood,Colorado 80112 (303}771-0900 Name of the Project: High Point at Mead REVENUES. A. Recurring Revenues: • 1. Property Tax. Market value all single family units[$317,016,000 ll" x factor[ 7.96% 1(2) =Assessed Valuation [$25,234,473] Market value all multi-family units[ $20,000,000 ID) x factor 1 7.96% ,j'2i =Assessed Valuation [$1,592,000 ] Market value all mooile home units[ 0 ]I° x factor[7.96% ]12) =Assessed Valuation 1 0 1 Market value all not -residential structures [ 155,618,100 ] ' x factor 1 29% ..j'Z'=Assessed Valuation [$45,129,249] Total Assessed Valuation [$71,955,722] Total Assessed Valr•ation[ 71,955,722 1x Town mill levy [ 8.919 mills ;X31=Town Property Tax Revenue [ $641,773 ] Total Assessed Valuation [ 71,955,722 ] x St.Vrairt School mill levy [ 39.982 mills,_)(3)=School Property Tax Revenue [$2,876,934 ] Page 1 of 6 'I)Developer's projected market value. '?'Call county assessor to determine what factor to use in order to obtain current assessed value of proposed development from market value in the area. `3i Contact the Town Clerk for current fact•rs. iMead - 1)-4 Form LUC - Revised ' 31-06.doc January 31. 2006 • Total Assessed Valuation [ 71,955,722 1 x Mt. View Fire District mill levy[ 8.037 mills 1(31= Fire District Property Tax Revenue [$578,308 ] Total Assessed Valuation [ 71,955,722 )x Weld County mill levy[ 17.900 mills 1'31 =County Property Tax Revenue [$1,288,007] Total Assessed Valuation [71,955,722 )x St. Vrain San. Dist. mill levy[3.918 mills 1{31 =St. Vrain San. Dist. Tax Revenue [$281,923 Total Assessed Valuation [71,955,722 ] x all other mill levies [ 4.503 mills )1'1=Other Property Tax Revenue [$324,017 I Total Property Tax Revenue [$5,990,9621 2. Sales Tax. Population in the development ( 3501 x the last year's per capita collection [ $48.46 11 1 =total annual sales tax revenue [$169,658 ] Estimated gross retail sales within the development [ 169,658 ] x 2%'31 =total annual sales tax revenue [$3,393 1 3. Sewer Revenue. Population in the development [ 3501 1x the last year's per capita collection[ $75.21 ](3) =total annual sewer revenue [$263,310 1 • 4. Other Revenue (taxes,fees, permits,etc.). Population in the development [ 3501 Ix the last year's per capita collection f $65.80 )131 =total other revenue [$230,366 Nonresidential - business licenses, liquor licenses, etc.131 =total annual other revenue [$10,000 ] TOTAL RECURRING REVENUE [$676,727 B. One-Time Revenues. 1. Building Permits. Market value of structure(s) [71,955,722 ]1'1 x factor f .0099375 + $30.00/BP In) =building permit revenue f$758,140 1 2. Use Taxes. Market value of structure(s) [71,955,722 11'1 x 50% x 2%= use tax revenue [$719,557 ] Page 2 of 6 m Developer's projected market value_ '2'Call county assessor to determine what factor to use in order to obtain current assessed value of proposed development from market value in the area. Contact the Town Clerk for current factors. • Mead - D-4 Form LOC - Revised 1-31-06.doc January 31, 2006 • 3. Sewer Plant Investment. Total taps x factor [ $6,000.00 1,3t =total PIF [$8,616,000 ] 4. Storm drainage. Number of dwelling units f 1436 )x$131 = residential storm drainage impact fees [$188,116 ] Square feet of nonresidential development[ 1,559,230 x $0.08!sq.ft. = nonresidential storm drainage impact fees [$124,738 1 5. Transportation. Number of dwelling units 1 1436 ] x$1,350 = residential transportation impact fees [$1,938,600 ] Square feet of nonresidential development[1,559,230 1 x $0.37!sq.ft. = non,esidential transportation impact fees [$576,915 ] 6. Open Space. Number of dwelling units[ 1436 1 x $1,852 = residential open space impact fees [$2,659,472 ] Square feet of nonresidential development [1,559,230 ] x$0.47/sq.ft. = nonresidential open space impact fees [$732,838 ] • 7. Police Protection. Number of dwelling units [ 1436 )x $50 = residential police protection impact fees [$71,800 1 Square feet of nonresidential development [1,559,230 1 x $0.01/sq.ft. = nonresidential police protection impact fees [$15,590 ] 8. Municipal Facilities. Number of dwelling units [ 1436 ] x $1, 697 = residential municipal facilities impact fees [$2,436,892 ) Square feet of nonresidential development[1,559,230 ] x $0.43/sq.ft. = nonresidential municipal facilities impact fees [$670,469 ] 9. Park System. Number of dwelling units 1 1436 1 x $462 =residential park system impact fees [$663,432 ] 10. Recreation Center. Number of dwelling units 1 1436 1 x $1, 683 Page 3 of 6 ill Developer's projected market value. ‘2'Call county assessor to determine what factor to use in order to obtain current assessed value of proposed development horn market value in the area. f31 Contact the Town Clerk for current factors. Mead - D-4 Form LUC - Revised 1 -31-06.doc January 31. 2006 • = residential recreation center impact fees [$2,416,788 ] 11. Downtown Revitalization (public facilities). Number of dwelling units[ 1436 ] x $304 = residential downtown revitalization impact fees [$436,544 ] 12. Capital Equipment. Number of dwelling units f 1436 ] x$316 = residential capital equipment impact fees [$453,776 ] Square feet of nonresidential development [1,559,230 ] x $0.09/sq.ft. = nonresidential capital equipment impact fees [$140,330 ] TOTAL ONE TIME REVENUE f$23,619,997] II. EXPENDITURES. A. Recurring Costs. 1. Street Maintenance. Acres in development [ 595 1x 4%x factor[ $2,287.00 ]131 =total street maintenance costs [$54,430 ] • 2. Police Protection. Projected population at full development [3501 ] x per capita cost of police protection f $23.87 1131 =total police protection costs [ $83,569 ] Square feet of nonresidential development [ ] x [ ]131 = nonresidential police protection costs [ N/A 3. General Government. Projected population at full development [ 3501 1 x per capita cost of general government [ $87.18 1(31 =total general government costs [ $305,217 ] Square feet of nonresidential development f ] x f 1(31 = nonresidential general government costs [ N/A 4. Parks and Recreation. Projected population at full development '. 3501 ] x per capita cost of park maintenance [$10.00 ]fat =total park maintenance costs [$35,010 1 Page 4 of 6 `°Developer's projected market value. ,2r Call county assessor to determine what factor to use in order to obtain current assessed value of proposed development from market value in the area. 'a'Contact the Town Clerk for current factors. • Mead -D-4 Form LUG - Revised I-31-06.doc January 31, 2006 • 5. Sewer Collection and Treatment. Projected population at full development [ 3501 1 x per capita cost of sewer collection and treatment [ $100.20 1'3' =total sewer costs [$350,800 ] 6. Storm Water and Drainage. Projected population at full development [ 1 x per capita cost of storm water and drainage maintenance [ 1131=total storm water costs [ N/A Square feet of nonresidential development[ x [ ]131 = nonresidential storm water costs [ N/A TOTAL RECURRING COSTS I$829,026 ] B. One-Time Costs. 1. Park and Recreation. Projected population at full development [ 3501 1 x .001 facilities per capita x 5,000 sq.ft. x average cost per sq.lt. for recreation facilities J $65.00 1'31 =total recreation facilities costs [$1,137,825 2. Sewer Plant. • Projected population at full development [ 3501 ] x gallons per capita[ 120 gal. 111x cost per gallon of capacity[ $3.50 ]l3) =total cost of sewer plant [$1,470,420] TOTAL ONE-TIME COSTS [$2,608,245] TOTAL RECURRING REVENUES [$6,667,689 TOTAL RECURRING EXPENDITURES [$829,026 ] DIFFERENCE [$5,838,663] TOTAL ONE-TIME REVENUES [$23,619,997] TOTAL ONE-TIME EXPENDITURES [$2,608,245] DIFFERENCE [$21,011,752] ***********************************************************Or************* Page 5 of 6 Developer's projected market value. (2'Call county assessor to determine what factor to use in order to obtain current assessed value of proposed development from market value in the area. 13'Contact the Town Clerk for current factors. 1111 Mead - D-4 Form LUC - Revised 1-31-06.doc January 31, 2006 III. Signature of the Applicant. By this acknowledgment, the undersigned hereby certify that the above information is complete and true. (If the applicant is not the owner(s) of the subject property,the owner(s), mortgage and/or lienholder shall also sign the Application.) Owner: —,E��ti^ Date: ‘A 74 2i floe LY ri,..r 3 e 9 rven.r,va-.1;Gm ay 4-N71e..R.it 0- Arre. ut,,' ®wlaeF: -0eFt' Applicant: Date: (attach additional signatures as necessary) STATE OF EOL(iRAUC��O) SS. COUNTY OF ept-Lif fore 'ng instrument w s acrno�'/ledge� before me this C>l I day of Ju�Q , 20 by Y�YI n/rYl(�SJ{GLG� My commission expires: �� 3 �(/ Witness My hand and official see.' e • _ Notary Publ• /WitsLi. wit. MARY E.PATRICK 8 �.•: i MY COMMISSION EXPIRES tat May13,2012 • Page 6 of 6 f°Developer's projected market value. / Of L '2'Call county assessor to determine what l actor to use in order to obtain current assessed value of proposed development from market value in the area. Contact the Town Clerk for current face..s. • Mead - D-4 Form LUC -Revised !-31-06.doc January 31, 2006 III. Signature of the Applicant. By this acknowledgment, the undersigned hereby certify that the above information is complete and true. (If the applicant is not the owner(s) of the subject property,the owner(s), mortgage and/or lienholder shall also sign the Application.) Owner: "` Date: 6--7 U gi /Or //-D Pig--r-u- 0 t Win 1.1 Vgnirnil '-61 LrD. Gyff"r:BY !+Dc- Pa szrr, t l-7LJ1 / Gate: Applicant: Date: (attach additional signatures as necessary) STATE OF CBO) COUNTY OF UN1) IV ) SS. l'n20 /as fforro ping Inmost�mpint w as-�,knowledged before me this day of ` Wit fc My commissionexndo: µvn�I 131aOia � � Witness My hand and official sLtaL a .Jt • Notary Pub U 2 '�° _ MARY E.PATRICK t: MY COMMISSION EXPIRES May 13,2012 Page 6 of 6 L Or 2.- "'Developer's projected market value. °Call county assessor to determine what factor to use in order to obtain current assessed value of proposed development from market value in the area. • o,Contact the Town Clerk for current factors. Mead - D-4 Form LUC - Revised 1-31-06.doc January 31, 2006 • TOWN OF MEAD LAND USE CODE FORM D-5 AGREEMENT FOR PAYMENT OF REVIEW AND DEVELOPMENT EXPENSES INCURRED BY THE TOWN THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this_day of , A.D. 20_, by and between the TOWN OF MEAD, COLORADO, a municipal Corporation, hereinafter referred to as "the Town," and HD Path of Growth Partners, Ltd. &I-25 and 389 Partners, Ltd„ hereinafter referred to as"the Owner/Developer;" WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the Owner/Developer owns of certain property situated in the County of Weld, State of Colorado, and legally described as follows, to-wit: PROPERTY DESCRIPTION THE WEST HALF OF SECTION 33 AND THE SOUTHERLY 30 FEET OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 26, TOWNSHIP 4 NORTH, RANGE 68 WEST OF THE 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN AND THE NORTHERLY 30 FEET OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 2, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 68 WEST OF THE 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, WELD COUNTY, COLORADO. • LESS AND EXCEPT PARCELS DESCRIBED AT RECEPTION NO. 1505381, AT BOOK 1041, PAGE 278 AND AT BOOK 1528, PAGE 526, RECORDED AT THE WELD COUNTY CLERK & RECORDER'S OFFICE. AND ALSO THE EAST HALF OF SECTION 35 AND THE SOUTHERLY 30 FEET OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 26, TOWNSHIP 4 NORTH, RANGE 68 WEST OF THE 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN AND THE NORTHERLY 30 FEET OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 2, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 68 WEST OF THE 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, WELD COUNTY, COLORADO. LESS AND EXCEPT THE EASTERLY 30 FEET OF THE EAST HALF OF SAID SECTION 35, THE EASTERLY 30 FEET OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 2, THE EASTERLY 30 FEET OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 2 AND A PARCEL DESCRIBED AT RECEPTION NO. 02204895, RECORDED AT THE AT THE WELD COUNTY CLERK & RECORDER'S OFFICE. CONTAINING 26,206.407 SQUARE FEET, (601.616 ACRES), MORE OR LESS, TOGETHER WITH AND SUBJECT TO ALL EASEMENTS AND RIGHT OF WAYS EXISTING AND/OR OF PUBLIC RECORD. WHEREAS, the development process included all aspects of land use including but not limited to annexation, subdivision, change of land use and the installation of public improvements; and WHEREAS, the Owner/Developer desires to develop said property and has made application to the Board of Trustees of the Town of 11/1,. ad for approval of Annexation and High Point at Mead - D-5 Form LUt. .doc • Revised 1!6l03(10.30pm) Page 1 of 4 . WHEREAS, the Parties hereto recognize that the cash deposits and non-refundable land use fees as specified by the Municipal Code of the Town of Mead may not be adequate to fully cover the Town's expenses in considering the referenced application, including, but not limited to, legal publications, planning services, engineering services, attorney fees, consultant fees, reproduction of material, public hearing expenses and recording documents; and WHEREAS, the Parties hereto recognize that the Town will continue to incur expenses throughout the entire development process until final completion of the development project; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and of the mutual promises and conditions hereinafter contained, it is hereby agreed as follows: 1. FULL AND SEPARATE ACCOUNTING OF REVIEW AND DEVELOPMENT EXPENSES. The Town will maintain separate accounts of all monies collected and expended as a result of the review of the above referenced application throughout the development process. Monthly statements of expenses incurred and the balance remaining in the account will be made available to the Owner/Developer by the Town. 2. EXPENDITURE OF FEES PAID BY THE OWNER/DEVELOPER. The Town shall expend the monies collected from the Owner/Developer in the form of land use fees and cash deposits, in the payment of expenses incurred in processing the Owner/Developer's request, throughout the development process until final completion of the project. Expenses shall include, but not limited to, fees charged to the Town for legal publications, planning services, engineering services, attorney services, consultant services, reproduction of material, public hearing expenses, the securing of permits and easements and the recording of documents. Any cash deposits held by the Town and not expended, will be refunded to the • Owner/Developer, without interest, upon completion or termination of project. 3. PAYMENT OF REVIEW AND OTHER EXPENSES BY THE OWNER/DEVELOPER. In the event that the Town incurs expenses for the review of the Owner/Developer's request, greater than the monies collected from the Owner/Developer in the form of land use fees and cash deposits, the Owner/Developer shall reimburse the Town for the additional expenses and/or replenish the cash deposits to the level specified. Said reimbursement and/or replenishment shall be made within ten (10)days of the Town submitting an invoice for the expenses, or a demand for the replenishment of the cash deposit. Failure by the Owner/Developer to pay within the specified time shall be cause for the Town to cease processing the application, or deny the Owner/Developer of the right to appear before Planning Commission or the Board of Trustees, or deny approval of the application, withhold the issuance of building permits or certificates of occupancy. 4. APPLICATION TERMINATION Except where the law or an agreement with the Town provides otherwise, the Owner/Developer may terminate his application at any time by giving written notice to the Town. The Town shall immediately take all reasonable steps necessary to terminate the accrual of costs to the Owner e.g., notify newspapers to cancel publications, etc. The Owner/Developer will continue to be liable for all costs reasonably incurred by the Town to terminate the application. 5. COLLECTION OF FEES AND COSTS. If the Owner/Developer fails to pay the fees required herein when due, the Town may take those steps necessary and authorized by law to collect the fees due. The Town shall also be entitled to High Point at Mead - D-5 Form LUC.doc Revised 1/6/03(10 30 Dm) • Page 2 of 4 • all court and attorney's fees, other costs incurred in collection and interest on the amount due at the rate of 18% per annum. 6. PERSONAL GUARANTY. At the option of the Board of Trustees, the Owner/Developer may be required to provide a personal guaranty for the payment of review and other expenses. 7. ORIGINAL COUNTERPARTS. This Agreement may be executed as counterparts, each of which will be an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Town and the Owner/Developer have caused this Agreement to be duly executed on the day and year first above written. By this acknowledgment, the undersigned hereby agreed to be bound by the terms and conditions of this agreement. (Signature Instructions:And additional signature lines and notary certificates for each signature.) TOWN OF MEAD OWNER/DEVELOPER By Richard W. Macomber, Mayor Benson Armistead Director of Asset Management • HD Path of Growth Partners, Ltd. by HDC Partners GP, LLQ; general partner Benson Armistead Director of Asset Management 1-25 and 389 Partners, Ltd. by Lanterra Interest, LLC, general partner ATTEST: By Candace Bridgwater, Town Clerk High Point at Mead - D-5 Form LU:..doc • Revise0. 1/6/03(10.30 pm) Page 3 of 4 • STATE OF COLORADO ) )SS. COUNTY OF The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 20 by as Mayor and as Town Clerk of the Town of Mead. My commission expires: Witness my hand and official seal. Notary Public STATE OF TEXAS St COUNTY OF COLLIN ) Thn foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 13 mac.day of ( , 20 by (1Sor• A-ro.,1/453,reaek l My commission expires: 14(.b t.I-- OK1PEYTON Witness My hand and and official seal. Rte . D�-, f* MYcoMMts$IONEXPPES • n Ap120,201!Notary Public C ^ L _. STATE OF TEXAS SS. COUNTY OF COLLIN ) Thg,foregoing in_strument was cknowledged before me this O3\ day of , 20 68 by het\Son Pt-Cmc5 My commission expires:"tt d0 1 la Witness My hand and official seal. OO tt„ 7 MY VI E%PYiES 40, KT Notary Public H "� - pQ�t2 is High Point at Mead - D-5 Form LU('.doc • Rev:saa 1/6/03 po ao omi Page 4 of 4 AVEX FUND V, INC. 8982 05/19/08 Check#: Vendor ID: TOWN MEAD Vendor Name: Town of Mead ice No. Date Invoice Amount Amount Paid Discounts Taken Credits Taken Net Amount 908 05/19/08 5700.00 5700.00 0.00 0.00 5700.00 Net Check Amt 5700.00 8982 Frost National Bank AVEX FUND V, INC. I� J 5953 DALLAS PARKWAY, SUITE 200-A PLANO,TEXAS 75093 30-9-1140 ************ Five Thousand Seven Hundred & 00/100 Dollars 0 DATE AM.OLNT 05/19/08 5,700.00 P e,Flo Town of Mead AUTuuntu0 SIG u 0'OO8982H' 1: 1L40000934: 33005556611• • CH2M HILL 9191 South Jamaica Street 411 Denver,CO 80112 Tel CH2 HILL Fax 72 .286.900 Fax 720.286.9250 July 1,2008 Mead Board of Trustees Town of Mead P.O. Box 626 Mead, CO 80542 Letter of Intent Dear Town Board Members: On behalf of HD Path of Growth Partners, Ltd. and I-25 and 389 Partners, Ltd.,we welcome the opportunity to present the High Point at Mead (Site) petition for annexation. The annexation incorporates all 601 acres of the Site into the Town of Mead, Colorado. The proposed Site will consist of single-family and multi-family residential, commercial, open space and mixed use development. Foreseeing the development of future roadways and access points to the property, the owner's have proposed a land use plan that is similarly depicted in the Town of Mead 2004 Comprehensive Plan. • The High Point at Mead property is located in unincorporated Weld County, at the northeast corner of Interstate-25 (I-25) and County Road 38 (CR 38) and bound by future CR 11 to the east and future CR 40 to the north. The property is within a portion of the south half of Section 26 and a portion of Section 35, Township 4 North,Range 68 West,6TH P.M. as well as a portion of the north half of Section 2, Township 3 North, Range 68 West, 6th P.M. (See attached vicinity map.) Proposed Land Uses The proposed development will consist of approximately 1,036 single family medium density units and 400 multi-family high density units. CR 9.5 will act as a buffer separating the residential community from the commercial land uses. The land use to the west of CR 9.5 and along I-25 will incorporate approximately 61 acres of commercial as well as 82 acres of mixed use development dedicated for commercial and light industrial use. The proposed development will be the first in the area,but will accurately depict the Town of Mead Comprehensive Plan. The existing adjacent land owners consist of low density homes surrounded by agricultural land. Future development to the south will create similar proposed land uses and create continuity between the Town of Mead and the proposed Site. Future development east of the Site is shown on the comprehensive plan as low density residential. • • Traffic and Access The proposed development will utilize one point of access until future development in the region is stimulated. Improvements to CR 38 will be made in order to provide adequate access to the proposed development. The Town of Mead Transportation Plan references the future growth within the region and eventual need for an interchange along I-25 at either CR 38 or CR 40. The internal roadway system consists of multiple collectors and one major arterial, CR 9.5. The major arterial is utilized as a buffer between the residential and the commercial land uses and will promote access to the development. The collector roadways meander through the residential neighborhoods as well as provide access to the commercial and mixed use parcels. The proposed residential curvilinear collector will promote a safe traffic speed and create desirable community character. A preliminary traffic report has been included with the petition for annexation. Landscaping and Open Space The parks and open space within High Point at Mead will serve its residents and users as an opportunity for recreation, gathering, passive use and scenic beauty. These areas are envisioned as a series of connected open spaces, each with its own unique character linked by an extensive trail system. These trails will be located within outlots, landscape buffers, 4111 street right of ways, parks and open spaces providing pedestrian connectivity and promoting the outdoor lifestyle associated with Colorado. Building and Architecture The goal of HD Path of Growth Partners, Ltd. and I-25 and 389 Partners, Ltd. is to develop an attractive, pedestrian friendly community that offers a variety of housing options, retail and employment centers with compatible architectural styles reflective of the western region. Water and Sewer Service The Site falls within the boundaries of the Little Thompson Water District (LTWD) and the Town of Mead Sewer. The sanitary sewer for the proposed Site will outfall to the future Town of Mead Wastewater Treatment Plant located east of I-25 and CR 34. A commitment letter from the Town of Mead Sewer has been included. The applicant has closely coordinated details pertaining to the Site with the district engineer and will continue the effort upon approval of the annexation. The LTWD stated that a commitment letter will be issued once their water analysis of the land use plan is complete. School Districts 4111 The 2004 Town of Mead Land Use Plan School District Boundary Map shows that the Site is bisected by the Johnstown/St. Vrain Valley School District boundary line. Discussions with • both school districts have led to the likely decision that the Site will be served by both districts. The yield rates for each district were obtained and are tabulated in the section, Statement of School Impact. Community Amenities The High Point at Mead property will include a pedestrian friendly network of parks,open space, and trails. Future programming at the Preliminary and Final Plat stage of each phase of development will evaluate the need for additional amenities. The High Point at Mead development will provide an array of opportunities for the Town of Mead. The proposed Site provides a diverse land use plan and will promote the future growth of adjacent properties. We look forward to working with the Town of Mead to build a desirable community and hope the Board of Trustees and Mead citizens support this opportunity. Sincerely, r • Bonner Gilmore Attachments: Vicinity Map • • VICINITY MAP STATE HWY 56 t COUNTY ROAD 44 ro O S COUNTY ROAD 40 2 w 1 tr) / § 1 c4 COUNTY ROAD 38 X o of _ COUNTY ROAD 34 — n R O rc i 1 HWY 66 0 HIGH POINT AT MEAD PETITION FOR ANNEXATION • TO: THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF MEAD, COLORADO: (We), HD Path of Growth Partners, Ltd. And 1-25 and 389 Partners, Ltd. the undersigned landowner in accordance with Colorado law, hereby petition the Town of Mead and its Board of Trustees for annexation to the Town of Mead of the following described unincorporated territory located in the County of Weld and State of Colorado, to-wit: pROPERTY DESCRIPTION THE WEST HALF OF SECTION 35 AND THE SOUTHERLY 30 FEET OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 26, TOWNSHIP 4 NORTH, RANGE 68 WEST OF THE 6Th PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN AND THE NORTHERLY 30 FEET OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 2, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 68 WEST OF THE 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, WELD COUNTY, COLORADO. LESS AND EXCEPT PARCELS DESCRIBED AT RECEPTION NO. 1505381, AT BOOK 1041, PAGE 278 AND AT BOOK 1528, PAGE 526, RECORDED AT THE WELD COUNTY CLERK & RECORDER'S OFFICE. AND ALSO THE EAST HALF OF SECTION 35 AND THE SOUTHERLY 30 FEET OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 26, TOWNSHIP 4 NORTH, RANGE 68 WEST OF THE 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN AND THE NORTHERLY 30 FEET OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 2, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 68 WEST OF THE 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, WELD COUNTY, COLORADO. • LESS AND EXCEPT THE EASTERLY 30 FEET OF THE EAST HALF OF SAID SECTION 35, THE EASTERLY 30 FEET OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 2, THE EASTERLY 30 FEET OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 2 AND A PARCEL DESCRIBED AT RECEPTION NO. 02204895, RECORDED AT THE AT THE WELD COUNTY CLERK & RECORDER'S OFFICE. CONTAINING 26,206,407 SQUARE FEET, (601.616 ACRES), MORE OR LESS, TOGETHER WITH AND SUBJECT TO ALL EASEMENTS AND RIGHT OF WAYS EXISTING AND/OR OF PUBLIC RECORD. As part of this petition, your petitioner further states to the Board of Trustees of Mead, Colorado, that: 1. It is desirable and necessary that the territory described above be annexed to the Town of Mead. 2. The requirements of C.R.S. sections 31-12-104 and 31-12-105, as amended, exist or have been met in that: a. Not less than one-sixth of the perimeter of the area proposed to be annexed is contiguous with the Town of Mead or will be contiguous with the Town of Mead within such time as required by 31-12-104. b. A community of interest exists between the area proposed to be annexed and the Town of Mead. c. The area proposed to be annexed is urban or will be urbanized in the near future d. The area proposed to be annexed is integrated with or is capable of being integrated • Annexation Petiliol 1/30/20] 1 • with the Town of Mead. e. No land within the boundary of the territory proposed to be annexed which is held in identical ownership, whether consisting of one tract or parcel of real estate or two or more contiguous tracts or parcels of real estate, has been divided into separate parts or parcels without the written consent of the landowner or landowners thereof, unless such tracts or parcels were separated by a dedicated street, road or other public way. f. No land within the boundary of the area proposed to be annexed which is held in identical ownership, comprises twenty acres or more, and which, together with the buildings and improvements situated thereon has an assessed value in excess of two hundred thousand dollars ($200,000.00) for ad valorem tax purposes for the year next preceding the annexation, has been included within the area proposed to be annexed without the written consent of the landowner or landowners. g. No annexation proceedings have been commenced for any portion of the territory proposed to be annexed for the annexation of such territory to another municipality. h. The annexation of the territory proposed to be annexed will not result in the detachment of area from any school district. i. The annexation of the territory proposed to be annexed will not have the effect of extending the boundary of the Town of Mead more than three miles in any direction from any point of the boundary of the Town of Mead in any one year. j. Prior to completion of the annexation of the territory proposed to be annexed, the Town • of Mead will have in place a plan for that area,which generally describes the proposed: Location, character, and extent of streets, subways, bridges, waterways, waterfronts, parkways, playgrounds, squares, parks, aviation fields, other public ways, grounds, open spaces, public utilities, and terminals for water, light, sanitation, transportation, and power to be provided by the Town of Mead; and the proposed land uses for the area; such plan to be updated at least once annually. k. In establishing the boundary of the territory proposed to be annexed, if a portion of a platted street or alley is to be annexed, the entire width of the street or alley has been included within the territory to be annexed. The Town of Mead will not deny reasonable access to any landowners, owners of any easement, or the owners of any franchise adjoining any platted street or alley which is to be annexed to the Town of Mead but is not bounded on both sides by the Town of Mead. 3. The owners of more than fifty percent of the area proposed to be annexed, exclusive of dedicated streets and alleys, have signed this petition and hereby petition for annexation of such territory. 4. Accompanying this petition are four copies of an annexation map containing the information following: a. A written legal description of the boundaries of the area proposed to be annexed; b. A map showing the boundary or the area proposed to be annexed, said map prepared and containing the seal of a registered engineer; c. Within the annexation boundary map, a showing of the location of each ownership tract in unplatted land and, if part or all of the area is platted, the boundaries and the plat numbers of plots or of lots and blocks; • Annexation Petition V30/207 2 • d. Next to the boundary of the area proposed to be annexed, a drawing of the contiguous boundary of the Town of Mead and the contiguous boundary of any other municipality abutting the area proposed to be annexed, and a showing of the dimensions of such contiguous boundaries. 5. Upon the Annexation Ordinance becoming effective, all lands within the area proposed to be annexed will become subject to all ordinances, rules and regulations of the Town of Mead, except for general property taxes of the Town of Mead which shall become effective as the January 1 next ensuing. 6. The zoning classification (land use) requested for the area proposed to be annexed is single family residential, commercial and mixed use in Performance District 1. 7. Petitioners reserve the right to withdraw this Petition and to withdraw their signatures thereon at any time prior to commencement of roll call before the Board of Trustees for the vote upon second [i.e.,final] reading of the annexation ordinance. WHEREFORE, the following petitioner respectfully requests that the Town of Mead, acting through its Board of Trustees, approve the annexation of the area proposed to be annexed. By this acknowledgment, the undersigned hereby certify that the above information is complete and true. (If the applicant is not the owner(s) of the subject property, the owner(s), mortgage and/or lienholder shall also sign the Application.) tria /Owner ' - � �"" Date: S/21f o� Owner: �y <�✓� pcn� �� Date: s/Ll/v 8 • �+H�+gl.�c,i4 idrrtTE.iTi Applicant: Date: (attach additional signatures as necessary) STATE OF COLORADO ) SS. COUNTY OF L,,,, w ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this .�] ' day of • 200 by o My commission expires: Spr✓ c') /' _ Witness My hand and official seal. \ / Notary Public itastadissasibasdrise „,./ VERONICA LUSTER Notary Public State of Colorado entiemetworrelerrn • Annexation Petition 1/30/207 3 s Landowner/Petitioner Date Signed Legal Description Mailing Address of Land Owned HD Path of Growth Partners, Ltd. & 1-25 and 389 Partners, Ltd. As shown in this petition 14875 Landmark Boulevard, Ste.306 Dallas, Texas 75254 CH2M HILL, Inc. 9191 South Jamaica Street As shown in this petition Englewood, Colorado 80112 S • Annexation Pelillon 1130/207 4 • AFFIDAVIT OF CIRCULATOR STATE OF COLORADO ss. COUNTY OF , being first duly sworn upon oath, deposes and says that(he or she)was the circulator of this Petition for Annexation of lands to the Town of Mead, Colorado, consisting of[ ] pages including this page and that each signature hereon was witnessed by your affiant and is the signature of the person whose name it purports to be. Circulator STATE OF COLORADO ) SS. COUNTY OF The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 200 by My commission expires: Witness My hand and official seal. • Notary Public • Annexation Petition 1/30/207 5 SECURITY 2695 Rocky Mountain Avenue,Suite 270 Loveland,CO 80538 TITLE Phone: (970)663-6600 GUARANTY �t Fax: (970)663-1017 Thank you forgiving us the opportunity to provide your closing and settlement services DELIVERY TRANSMITTAL DATE: July 1,2008 FILE NO.: S0246976 Amend No.5 PROP.ADDR.: TBD Weld County Road 38,Mead,CO 80542 OWNER/BUYER: HID Path Growth Partners LTD and I-25 and 389 Partners LTD Below is a list of clients to whom the attached materials have been delivered. Should you have any questions regarding these materials,please contact Security Title Guaranty Co.at the phone number below. Please review the attached materials carefully. Schedule A has been amended as follows: Legal Description and added Exception Schedule BII has been amended as follows: Deleted Exceptions Please Deliver To The Customers Listed Below: TO: Security Title Guaranty Co. ATTN: Becky Warner Loveland PHONE: (970)663-6600 2695 Rocky Mountain Avenue FAX: (970)663-1017 Suite 270 E-MAIL: rwarner@stgco.com Loveland,CO 80538 DELIVERY: E-MAIL •❑ If checked,supporting documentation enclosed NO.OF COPIES: 1 TO: Stanford Real Estate,LLC ATTN: Thomas Peterson 3555 Stanford Road#204 PIIONE• (970)226-1414 Fort Collins,CO 80525 FAX: (970)226-3348 E-MAIL: srellc@gwest.net DELIVERY: E-MAIL& EXPRESS DELIVERY ®If checked,supporting documentation enclosed NO.OF COPIES: 1 S 07/01/2008 3:20.21 nn RM File No.: S0246976,Amcnd.No.5 • STANDARD COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE ISSUED BY Security Title Guaranty Co. AS AGENT FOR First American Title Insurance Company INFORMATION The Title Insurance Commitment is a legal contract between you and the company. It is issued to show the basis on which we will issue a Title Insurance Policy to you. The Policy will insure you against certain risks to the land title, subject to the limitations shown in the Policy. The Company will give you a sample of the Policy form,if you ask. The Commitment is based on the land title as of the Commitment Date.Any changes in the land title or the transaction may affect the Commitment and the Policy. The Commitment is subject to its Requirements,Exceptions and Conditions. THIS INFORMATION IS NOT PART OF THE TITLE INSURANCE COMMITMENT. YOU SHOULD READ THE CONLMITMENT VERY CAREFULLY. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS ABOUT THE COMMITMENT PLEASE CONTACT THE ISSUING OFFICE. AGREEMENT TO ISSUE POLICY First American Title Insurance Company, referred to in this commitment as the Company, through its agent Security Title Guaranty Co.,referred to in this Agreement as the Agent,agrees to issue a policy to you according to the terms of this commitment. When we show the policy amount and your name as the proposed insured in Schedule A, this commitment becomes effective as of the Commitment Date shown in Schedule A. If the Requirements shown in the Commitment have not been met within six months after the Commitment date, our obligation under this Commitment will end.Also our obligation under this Commitment will end when the Policy is issued and then our obligation to you will be under the Policy. Our obligation under this Commitment is limited by the following: The Provisions in Schedule A. The Requirements in Schedule B-1. The Exceptions in Schedule B-2. The Disclosures and Conditions contained in this Commitment. This Commitment is not valid without SCHEDULE A and Sections 1 and 2 of SCHEDULE B attached. • 07/01/2008 3:20:21 nn RM File No.: S0246976,Amend.No.5 • CONDITIONS 1. DEFINITIONS (a) "Mortgage"means mortgage,deed of trust or other security instrument. (b) "Public Records"means title records that give constructive notice of matters affecting the title according to state law where the land is located. (c) "Land" means the land or condominium unit described in Schedule A and any improvements on the land which are real ProPerty 2. LATER DEFECTS The Exceptions in Schedule B—Section 2 may he amended to show any defects,liens or encumbrances that appear for the first time in public records or are created or attached between the Commitment Date and the date on which all of the Requirements of Schedule B— Section 1 are met.We shall have no liability to you because of this amendment. 3. EXISTING DEFECTS If any defects,liens or encumbrances existing at Commitment Date are not shown in Schedule B,we may amend Schedule B to show them.If we do amend Schedule B to show these defects,liens or encumbrances,we shall be liable to you according to Paragraph 4 below unless you knew of this information and did not tell us about it in writing. 4. LIMITATION OF OUR LIABILITY Our only obligation is to issue to you the Policy referred to in this Commitment,when you have met its Requirements.If we have any liability to you for any loss you incur because of an error in this Commitment our liability will be limited to your actual loss caused by your relying on this Commitment when you acted in good faith to: • comply with the Requirements shown in Schedule B-Section 1 or • eliminate with our written consent any Exceptions shown in Schedule B-Section 2. We shall not be liable for more than the Policy Amount shown in Schedule A of this Commitment and our liability is subject to the terms of the Policy form to be issued to you. 5. CLAIMS MUST BE BASED ON THIS COMMITMENT Any claim,whether or not based on negligence,which you may have against us concerning the title to the land must be based on Iles Commitment and is subject to its terms. • DISCLOSURES GAP PROTECTION When this Company conducts the closing and is responsible for recording or filing the legal documents resulting from the transaction,the Company shall be responsible for all matters which appear on the record prior to such time of recording or filing. MECHANIC'S LIEN PROTECTION If you are a buyer of a single family residence you may request mechanic's lien coverage to be issued on your policy of insurance. If the property being purchased has not been the subject of construction, improvements or repair in the last six months prior to the date of this commitment,the requirements will be payment of the appropriate premium and the completion of an Affidavit and Indemnity by the seller. If the property being purchased was constructed,improved or repaired within six months prior to the dale of this commitment,the requirements may involve disclosure of certain financial information,payment of premiums,and indemnity,among others. The general requirements stated above are subject to the revision and approval of the Company. SPECIAL TAXING DISTRICT NOTICE The subject land may be located in a special taxing district;a certificate of taxes due listing each taxing jurisdiction shall be obtained from the county treasurer or the county treasurer's authorized agent;and information regarding special districts and the boundaries of such districts may be obtained from the board of county commissioners,the county clerk and recorder,or the county assessor. PRIVACY PROMISE FOR CUSTOMERS We will not reveal nonpublic personal information to any external non-affiliated organization unless we have been authorized by the customer,or are required by law. See attached Privacy Policy of Mercury Companies Inc.and Security Title Guaranty Co. CONSUMER DECLARATION STATEMENT This Comminnent for Title Insurance may include a Schedule B exception reference to recorded evidence that a mineral estate has been severed, leased,or otherwise conveyed from the surface estate.If such reference is made,there is a substantial likelihood that a third party holds some or all interest in oil,gas,other minerals or geothermal energy in the property.The referenced mineral estate may include the right to enter and use the property without the surface estate owner's permission.You may be able to obtain title insurance coverage regarding any such referenced mineral estate severance and its affect upon your ownership.Ask your title company representative for assistance with this issue. S 07/01/2008 3:20:21 nn Rid File No.: S0246976,Amend.No.5 • ....--------------- '+"woarevt y s at+nprti.sisr•. ir,e Privacy Policy of Mercury Companies,Inc. And Security Title Guaranty Co. We Are Committed to Safeguarding Customer Information In order to better serve your needs now and in the future,you have provided or will provide us with certain information. We understand that you may be concerned about what we will do with such information—particularly any personal or financial information. We agree that you have a right to know how we will utilize personal information you provide to us. Applicability This Privacy Policy governs ow use of the information that you provide to us. It does not govern the manner in which we may use information we have obtained from any other source,such as information obtained from a public record or from another person or entity. Types of Information Depending upon which of our services you are utilizing,the types of nonpublic personal information that we may collect include: • Information we receive from you on applications,forms and in other communications to us,whether in writing,in person,by telephone or any other means: • Information about your transactions with us,our affiliated companies,or others;and . • Information we receive from a consumer-reporting agency. Use of Information The information you provide us is for our own legitimate business purposes and not for the benefit of any affiliated or nonaffiliated party. Therefore,we will not release your information to affiliated and nonaffiliated parties except:(1)as necessary for us to provide the product or service you have requested of us;or(2)as permitted by law. We may,however,store such information indefinitely,including the period after which any customer relationship has ceased. Such information may be used for any internal purpose,such as quality control efforts or customer analysis. Furthermore,we may also provide all the information we collect,as described above,to companies that perform marketing services on our behalf,on behalf of our affiliated companies,or to other financial institutions with whom we or our affiliated companies have joint marketing agreements. Former Customers Even if you are no longer our customer,our Privacy Policy will continue to apply to you. Confidentially and Security We will use our best efforts to ensure that no unauthorized parties have access to any of your information. We restrict access to nonpublic personal information about you to those individuals and entities that need to know that information to provide products or services to you. We will use our best efforts to train and oversee our employees and agents to ensure that your information will be handled responsibly and in accordance with this Privacy Policy. We currently maintain physical,electronic,and procedural safeguards that comply with federal regulations to guard your nonpublic personal information. Security Title Guaranty Co. 2695 Rocky Mountain Avenue. Suite 270 Loveland,CO 80538 Phone: (970) 663-6600 • Fax: (970) 663-1017 COMMITMENT SCHEDULE A Commitment No: S0246976,Amend.No. 5 1. Commitment Date: June 24,2008 at 8:00 a.m. 2. Policy or Policies to be issued: Proposed Insured: Policy Amount (a) Owner's Policy $ TO COME TBD 3. Fee Simple interest in the land described in this Commitment is owned, at the Commitment Date by: • RD Path Growth Partners, LTD., a Texas limited partnership (Parcel A) and I-25 and 389 Partners,LTD.,a Texas limited partnership(Parcel B) 4. The land referred to in this Commitment is described as follows: See Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof. (for informational purposes only) TBD Weld County Road 38,Mead. CO 80542 PREMIUM: Informational Commitment $414.00 Extra Parcel $ 300.00 07/01/2008 3:20:56 rm RM • 07/01.'2008 3:20:21 no RM File No.: S0246976,Amend.No.5 0 Exhibit A Parcel A: The West!'2 of Section 35, Township 4 North,Range 68 West of the 6th P.M.,County of Weld, State of Colorado, EXCEPTING THEREFROM those portions of said land as conveyed by instruments recorded April 25, 1939 in Book 1041 Page 278;April 8, 1959 in Book 1528,Page 526;July 6, 1967 in Book 583,Reception No. 1505381; February 20,2001 at Reception No. 2826736 and April 7,2003 at Reception No. 3049575. Parcel B: Parcel One: A portion of the Northwest Quarter of Section 35,Township 4 North, Range 68 West of the 6th P.M., Weld County,Colorado,being more particularly described as follows: Considering the North line of the Northwest Quarter of Section 35,Township 4 North,Range 68 West as assumed to bear South 89°07'48"West and with all bearings contained herein relative thereto: Beginning at the Northeast Corner of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 35,said point being the True Point of Beginning; Thence along the North line of said Northwest Quarter South 89°07'48"West 2621.76 feet to the East line of that certain parcel of land as described in Book 1041 at Page 278,records of Weld County; Thence along said East line South 00°24'48"West 1628.83 feet; Thence departing said East line North 89°07'48"East 2621.06 feet to the East line of said Northwest Quarter; thence along said East line North00°26'16"East 1628.84 feet to the Northeast corner of said Northwest Quarter 0 and the True Point of Beginning,County of Weld,State of Colorado. Parcel Two: The East half of Section 35,Township 45 North, Range 68 West of the 6th P.M.,Weld County,Colorado, excepting therefrom the following described property: A tract of land located in the Southeast Quarter of said Section 35 described as follows: Commencing at the Southeast Corner of said Section 35 and considering the South Line of Southeast Quarter to bear North 90°00'00" West,with all other bearings contained herein being relative thereto; Thence North 00°50'42"East,30.00 feet along the East line of said South Quarter to a point on the North Right- of-Way line of Weld County Road No. 38 and the True Point of Beginning; Thence North 90°00'00"West, 1709.00 feet along said North Right-of-Way line; Thence North 00°50'42"East,561.00 parallel with the East line of said Southeast Quarter; Thence South 90°00'00"East, 1709.00 feet parallel with the South line of said Southeast Quarter and to a point on the East line of said Southeast Quarter; Thence 00°50'42"West,561.00 feet to the True Point of Beginning,County of Weld, State of Colorado. 0 0?/01i2008 3:20:21 nu RM File No.: S0246976,Amend.No.5 Form No. 1344-BI (CO-88) • ALTA Plain Language Commitment SCHEDULE B—Section 1 Requirements The following requirements must be met: a. Pay the agreed amounts for the interest in the land and/or for the mortgage to be insured. b. Pay us the premiums,fees and charges for the policy. c. Obtain a certificate of taxes due from the county treasurer or the county treasurer's authorized agent. d. Provide us the "Affidavit and Indemnity" signed by the parties listed in Paragraph 3, Schedule A of this Commitment and notarized. e. The following documents satisfactory to us must be signed,delivered and recorded: NONE AT THIS TIME • • 07/01/2008 3:20:21 nn RM File No.: S0246976,Amend.No.5 Form No. 1344-B1 (CO-88) • ALTA Plain Language Commitment SCHEDULE B—Section 1 Requirements(Continued) NOTE: IF THE SALES PRICE OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY EXCEEDS $100,000.00 THE SELLER SHALL BE REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH THE DISCLOSURE OR WITHHOLDING PROVISIONS OF C.R.S. 39-22-604.5 (NONRESIDENT WITHHOLDING). S • 07/01/2008 3:20:21 nn RM File No.: S0246976,Amend.No.5 Form No. 1344-B2(CO-88) 0 ALTA Plain Language Commitment SCHEDULE B—Section 2 Exceptions Any policy we issue will have the following exceptions unless they are taken care of to our satisfaction: 1. Taxes and Assessments not certified to the Treasurer's Office. 2. Any facts, rights, interests or claims which are not shown by the public records but which could be ascertained by an inspection of the land or by making inquiry of persons in possession thereof 3. Easements,or claims of easements,not shown by public records. 4. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines,shortage in area,encroachments, and any facts which a correct survey and inspection of the land would disclose,and which are not shown by the public records. 5. Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor or material heretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law and not shown by the public records. 6. Any and all unpaid taxes,assessments and unredeemed tax sales. 7. Reservations by the Union Pacific Railroad Company of(1) oil, coal and other minerals underlying the • land, (2) the exclusive right to prospect for, mine and remove oil, coal and other minerals, and (3) the right of ingress and egress and regress to prospect for,mine and remove oil,coal and other minerals,all as contained in Deed recorded April 28, 1909 in Book 233 at Page 206,and any and all assignments thereof or interests therein. 8. An easement for a pipeline and incidental purposes granted to Wyco Pipe Line Company by the instrument recorded March 13, 1947 in Book 1199 at Page 389. Partial Release of Right of Way conveyance recorded August 17, 1967 in Book 585 at Reception No. 1506784. 9. An easement for communication systems and incidental purposes granted to American Telephone and Telegraph Company by the instrument recorded May 16, 1968 in Book 595 at Reception No. 1516509. Quit Claim Deed recorded September 04, 1969 in Book 614 at Reception No. 1536307. Amendment of Grant of Easement recorded December 29, 1995 in Book 1525 at Reception No. 2469722. 10. An Oil and Gas Lease, from Union Pacific Railroad Company as Lessor(s) to Pan American Petroleum Corporation as Lessee(s) dated November 30, 1970, recorded December 29, 1970 in Book 638 at Reception No. 1559661, and any and all assignments thereof or interests therein. 11. An undivided full interest in all oil, gas and associated liquid hydrocarbons conveyed to Champlin Petroleum Company by Mineral Deed recorded March 22, 1974 in Book 710 at Reception No. 1632495, and any and all assignments thereof or interests therein. 12. An easement for water lines and incidental purposes granted to Little Thompson Water District and Central Weld County Water District by the instrument recorded August 29, 1989 in Book 1242 at Reception No.2189962. III 07/01/2008 3.20:21 mi RM File No.: S0246976,Amend.No.5 Form No. 1344-B2(CO-88) 0 ALTA Plain Language Commitment SCHEDULE B—Section 2 Exceptions(Continued) 13. An easement for water lines and incidental purposes granted to Central Weld County Water District by the instrument recorded December 05, 1989 in Book 1250 at Reception No.2199407. 14. An easement for water lines and incidental purposes granted to Central Weld County Water District by the instrument recorded December 05, 1989 in Book 1250 at Reception No. 2199410. 15. An easement for a water pipeline and incidental purposes granted to Michael Hayden and Judy O. Hayden by the instrument recorded February 08, 1990 in Book 1255 at Reception No.2204894, 16. Notice concerning underground facilities of United Power, Inc., formerly Union Rural Electric Association,Inc.recorded January 24, 199I in Book 1288 at Reception No.2239296. 17. Terms, conditions,provisions, agreements and obligations contained in the Option and Lease Agreement by and between Glen S. Douthit and U S West NewVector Group, Inc. as evidenced by Memorandum recorded July 20, 1995 in Book 1502 at Reception No. 2447517. 18. All items as set forth on the Plat of Subdivision Exemption No. 555, recorded February 16, 1996 in Book 1 532 at Reception No.2476722. III19. Terms,conditions,provisions,agreements and obligations contained in the Site Lease with Option by and between Glen S. Douthit and Western PCS III License Corporation, as evidenced by Memorandum recorded December 13, 1996 in Book I581 at Reception No.2525000. 20. Terms, conditions, provisions, agreements and obligations specified under the Utility Easement Agreement by and between Glen S.Douthit and Western PCS III License Corporation recorded February 26, 1997 in Book 1593 at Reception No. 2535047. 21. All items as set forth on Subdivision Exemption No. 632, recorded March 11, 1997 in Book 1595 at Reception No. 2537251. 22. Terms, conditions, provisions, agreements and obligations specified under the Utility Easement Agreement by and between Glen S. Douthit and Western PCS III License Corporation recorded March 19, 1997 in Book 1596 at Reception No. 2538462. 23. An easement for a single pipeline and incidental purposes granted to Duke Energy Field Services,LP by the instrument recorded December 21,2001 at Reception No.2911291. 24. An Oil and Gas Lease, from RME Petroleum Company and RME Land Corp as Lessor(s) to United States Exploration, Inc. as Lessee(s) dated October 25, 2001, recorded May 20, 2002 at Reception No. 2952960, and any and all assignments thereof or interests therein. 25. Request for Notification of Surface Development recorded May 28,2002 at Reception No. 2955250. 26. All items as set forth on Land Survey Plat recorded January 31,2005 at Reception No.3257298. • 27. An easement for a pipeline and incidental purposes granted to Duke Energy Field Services, LP by the instrument recorded August 02,2006 at Reception No. 3408256. 07/01/2008 3:20:21 nn RM File No.: 50246976,Amend.No.5 Form No. 1344-B2(CO-88) AJ.TA Plain Language Commitment 0 SCHEDULE B—Section 2 Exceptions (Continued) 28. An easement for a pipeline and incidental purposes granted to Duke Energy Field Services, LP by the instrument recorded August 02,2006 at Reception No. 3408257. 29. An easement for a pipeline and incidental purposes granted to Duke Energy Field Services, LP by the instrument recorded August 02,2006 at Reception No.3408258. 30. All items as set forth on ALTA/ACSM Land Title Survey recorded September 06, 2006 at Reception No. 3417604. 31. Terms, conditions, provisions, agreements and obligations contained in the Town of Mead, Colorado Ordinance No. 586 recorded March 14, 2007 at Reception No. 3461758. 32. Terms, conditions, provisions, agreements and obligations contained in the Town of Mead, Colorado Ordinance No. 587 recorded March 14.2007 at Reception No. 3461759. 33. All items as set forth on I-25/WCR 36-WCR 40 Annexation Map recorded March 14, 2007 at Reception No. 3461760. 34. Request for Notification of Pending Surface Development recorded August 15, 2007 at Reception No. 3497279. III 35. Request for Notification of Surface Development recorded October 15,2007 at Reception No. 3511023. 36. Rights of Way for Weld County Road 38 and Weld County Road 40. 37. Rights of Way for the Farmers Extension Ditch and the Highland Ditch as the same affect the land. 38. Any existing leases or tenancies. 39. Any water rights or claims or title to water, in,on or under the land. 40. Deed of Trust from HD Path of Growth Partners, Ltd., to the Public Trustee of Weld County, for the benefit of Charles W. Davidson and Anita Davidson, Trustees of The Davidson Living Trust dated 12/06/1989, securing an original principal indebtedness of$350,000.00, and any other amounts and/or obligations dated December 12,2005,recorded December 16,2005 at Reception No. 3348321. 41. Rights of way for County Roads 30 feet wide on either side of Section and Township lines,as established by the Board of County Commissioners for Weld County,Colorado, recorded October 14, 1889 in Book 86 at Page 273. 42. Road Viewers Report recorded April 24, 1900 in Book 83 at Page 268. 43. An easement for a drain, pipeline, sump and incidental purposes granted to Emil A. Olson by the instrument recorded April 25, 1951 in Book 1301 at Page 309. III 07/01/2008 3:20:21 nu RM File No.: 50246976,Amend.No.5 Form No. 1344-B2(CO-88) • ALTA Plain Language Commitment SCHEDULE B—Section 2 Exceptions(Continued) • • 000000o 000000000000 El • co N o m w c000000"00°"';400 000000000 000 ,- 00000 0..000°0 ocoaccommocomsOO88,08cco m OOOOOOOOOOOOOOO000 0000000000 000000000 X0000000 0000 0000000000002000 0000000000 000000000 H0000000 0 -00- _01 E E D E o w a w _ .2E “- 3 r E E `a 3 t E v - - '0�j i m p m 3500003505_ m c9>m0 m w`o o '300= 55 „coo 2�°7 m o o a¢a(9 d m a a u ¢m a o o 3 0 m I. o o a n 0 2 6 b ¢ 0 — .¢LLmm d -46 -25 ¢'a J ^' 0 ` ,,-,0=-0, 8 _ m o v ¢ 0 6 0, . - €00000000o00 2 cc 8022 � z0C 0OO O AA6om N0 C ¢d?0.':a m •0 N o m, N 0 m u 7 m m N X O e N a -0 0 0 0---a e 0 0 N N O M 66 J u CO 00 - 6o 2al CC tea - p - 0 m 600' .E_ __,6 c'e15 C mm 63 m o w a s __ ` O 0 a, HHUo o E N 2 E E m; M 8m a mwmom 'o`0 u c° " ' u, �O C ug 3m:,c, g, d Ev Z U m I D`- c a C '� _$ rnF c c 2 v o '01a 5 gE 10}t32 Q E1" °3'0mmG83 " (j u m m EEcoonogn N o c a co ¢a a<aa<ea`a9 a a` a c<_00uu33E O o E x _ — c c c c c c c c c ¢E>3>0>>Y n R a c o =c E 0 m m m m u m Y w -2 04'85) 55 E 0 E' E' ? ? d E E E'm` E E°0 (C) a 0352255555255555555, 55 0 E 000aocin m 00 o oaf�oEE m 000000D0Dc00D00000000000 0000000000 00 a a¢ 003 0 z m '1_5a>-.5 _ mrne - u = >m>0>3 Y i a n AT:EM.a m o 080 213E m m I ¢ u a 5055 - 2 o E m U 3 .o- 0 0 ` m w E O_ o O _ V'?F N E `m 0 U _ _ _ O ¢ j o pQ 50-5 5'0.,r, .54-1L- 525VI0U _ C8pd7, U a 2t .5 o c ° __ - " h 3 8 - Y m ea -0 -5c?'..N O _ l6 :1'l m0 a.a0,0 d c 0 n 8 2c ` 3 A' Q- m. 5'02,1 _ 0 z °0 C c-0-0 E o c t li' r %c J E g E o m E 0 o o 0,o- d m d v.E o._ c` • E > > EEh o,,' � � E' t, - 30` 0`n o 2. 05--".-716 m 6= =4.0 `m' o 0 o 0 0 c o O o w`a a _ m ->` 53> 013.0,, ,„„ 82,58, 8800;," F-5. 8F-> p` ` o o o r 00 6 E ;0. °0�' EO `00 E m a LL 3 3 3 0> Co�3 x D 0 0 2 0 0 H 0 o -O,m w 9 r r,HH 0 Og ` c o u. �, 5¢°m`o r H0 ax x xxx xxx xxx xx xxx x xx a • • AFFIDAVIT OF INTERESTED LAND OWNERS SURFACE ESTATE Subject Parcel: 106135000026 THE UNDERSIGNED, states that to the best of his or her knowledge the attached list is a true and accurate list of the names, addresses, and the corresponding Parcel Identification Number assigned by the Weld County Assessor of the owners of the property(the surface estate)within 500 feet of the property being considered. This list was compiled utilizing the records of the Weld County Assessor available on the Weld County Internet Mapping site, http://www.co.weld.co.us, and has not been modified from the original. The list compiled from the records of the Weld County Assessor was assembled within thirty days of the application's submission date. -[/L]JtjtkJenner Shepherd,'said Undersigned'and Marketing Resource Specialist with SECURITY TITLE GUARANTY CO; - "� a'` - Compiled said list utilizing the records of the Weld County Assessor available on the Weld County Internet Mapping Signature site,http://www.co.weld.co.us,and has not been modified from the original.The list compiled from the records of �7 the Weld County Assessor[ssess was assembled on July 0 '008 at 3:00pm.Parcel#106135000026 _ /_'c ,' a �tryyy''��,w��,,,,,,�� J&iferA.Sh lend- Date 3,0[x'► . Marketing Resource Specialist at SECURITY TITLE GUARANTY CO. r 343 W.Drake Road,Suite 200,Fort Collins,CO 80526,OFFICE:970.226.1901 FAX:970-225.6088 Property Owners Within 500 ft. of Parcel# 106135000026 NAME MAILING ADDRESS PARCEL IDENTIFICATION# • BACKLUND LEONORA WILLSON 2621 WISTERIA CT (51% INT) & GRAND IUNCTION,CO 81506- 120702200055 Additional Owners: 8528 BRODERICIC SARAH S (49%INT) 2034 FALCON DR GADDIS FAMILY REGISTERED 106136000028 LLLP LONGMONT,CO 80504 5953 DALLAS PARKWAY STE HD PATH GROWTH PARTNERS LTD 200 A 106135000004 PLANO,TX 75093 • 5953 DALLAS PARKWAY STE • HD PATH GROWTH PARTNERS LTD 200 A 106135200029 PLANO,TX 75093 • 5953 DALLAS PARKWAY STE • I-25 AND 389 PARTNERS LTD 200 A 106135000027 • PLANO,TX 75093 KAI KARRIE M & 5454 CR 38 • 120701200034 Additional Owners: PLATTEVILLE,CO 80651-9621 KAI ROSALBA ATTN: BARBARA A HORST • LUMBERMENS INVESTMENT CORP P O BOX 2030 120702000048 AUSTIN,TX.78768 MARKOFF JOSEPH& Additional Owners: 6989 ESTES DR MARKOFF JAMES A& 120702000037 MARKOFF WILLIAM E & ARVADA,CO 80004 ROTELLO HELEN A& WILSON SANDRA L MARTINI DAVID B & 5083 CR 38 106136000050 Additional Owners: PLATTEVILLE,CO 80651 MARTINI LORI E 4709 CR 38 RAMOS FRANK 106135000025 PLATTEVILLE,CO 80651 VETTER TOME & 4700 CR 38 120702000038 Additional Owners: PLATTEVILLE,CO 80651 VETTER NANCY D 5139 CR 38 YOUNG BRENDA LEE 106136300011 PLATTEVILLE,CO 8065.1 • S Identify Results Page 1 of 1 WELD COUNTY ASSESSOR • PROPERTY PROFILE Account#: R4704386 Parcel#: 106135000026 Tax Area: 3983 Bordering County: Acres: 132 Township Range Section Quart.Sec. Subdivison Name Block# Lot# 04 - 68 - 35 - 0 - - Owners Name&Address: Property Address: I-25 AND 389 PARTNERS LTD Street: 5953 DALLAS PARKWAY STE 200 A City: PLANO,TX 75093 Business/Complex: Sales Summary Sale Date Sale Price Deed Type Reception # 12/14/2006 $5,180,000 SWD 3442783 Legal Description 25881 SE4 35 4 68 EXC TR OF LAND 1709' X 510'ALSO EXC 1709' X 51' EXC UPRR RES (1R5D) Land Valuation Summary Unit of Number of Assessed • Land Type Abst Code Actual Value Measure Units Value Agricultural 4167 Acres 4 Agricultural 4127 Acres 58.9 Agricultural 4117 Acres 9.96 Agricultural 4117 Acres 56.04 Agricultural 4127 Acres 3.1 Land Subtotal: 132 $27,292 $7,920 No Buildings on Parcel • http://maps2.merrick.com/W ebsite/W eld/setSgl.asp?cmd=QUERY&DET=PP&pin=10613 5... 7/2/2008 Weld County, Colorado Page 1 of 3 Weld County, Colorado 71 85 ; 14 w R7 "• . 34 «.,( K; 25 88 t a' 0 "alt ir-T c) r w' f .„Wx fY' w ot- t-• t' *a•;6 , 1 • MEAD �y e... 031180111 ? .. 03 fiNV * n 3 fhrV/!►I .194gM� G • http://maps2.merrick.com/MerricklM S/ims?ServiceName=weldovr&Form=True&Encode=... 7/2/2008 • AFFIDAVIT OF INTERESTED LAND OWNERS SURFACE ESTATE Subject Parcel: 106135000027 THE UNDERSIGNED, states that to the best of his or her knowledge the attached list is a true and accurate list of the names, addresses, and the corresponding Parcel Identification Number assigned by the Weld County Assessor of the owners of the property (the surface estate)within 500 feet of the property being considered. This list was compiled utilizing the records of the Weld County Assessor available on the Weld County Internet Mapping site, http://www.co.weld.co.us, and has not been modified from the original. The list compiled from the records of the Weld County Assessor was assembled within thirty days of the application's submission date. Jennifer A.Shepherd,'said Undersigned'and Marketing Resource Specialist with SECURITY TITLE GUARANTY CO: — Compiled said list utilizing the records of the Weld County Assessor available on the Weld County Internet Mapping Signature site,http://www.co.weld.co.us and has not been modified from the original.The list compiled from the records of the Weld Comp Assessor wasassembled on July 02 2008 at 3:00pm.Parcel#106135000027 7/Oa/g8 ennifer A Shep erd U ! Date Marketing Resource Specialist at SECURITY TITLE GUARANTY CO. ttt""""' ,,, ��•��_ 343 W.Drake Road,Suite 200,Fort Collins,CO 80526,OFFICE:970.226.1901 FAX:970-225.6088 Property Owners Within 500 ft. of Parcel# 106135000027 NAME MAILING ADDRESS PARCEL IDENTIFICATION# • FRONT RANGE INVESTMENT ATTN: JAY PHILP HOLDINGS LLC PO BOX 88198 106125000004 TUKWILA,WA 98138-2198 FRONT RANGE INVESTMENT ATTN: JAY PHILP HOLDINGS LLC PO BOX 88198 106126200004 TUKWILA,WA 98138-2198 2034 FALCON DR GADDIS FAMILY REGISTERED 106136000028 LLLP LONGMONT,CO 20504 5953 DALLAS PARKWAY STE HD PATH GROWTH PARTNERS 200 A 106135200029 LTD PLANO,TX 75093 5953 DALLAS PARKWAY STE HD PATH GROWTH PARTNERS 200 A 106135000004 LTD PLANO,TX 75093 5953 DALLAS PARKWAY STE I-25 AND 389 PARTNERS LTD 200 A 106135000026 PLANO,TX 75093 I-25 AND 389 PARTNERS LTD (75% 5953 DALLAS PARKWAY STE • NT) 200 A 106135200028 PLANO,TX 75093 Additional Owners: • ENGEL RICHARD L(25%INT) 5139 CR 38 YOUNG BRENDA LEE 106136300011 PLATTEVILLE,CO 80651 • • Identify Results Page 1 of 1 WELD COUNTY ASSESSOR • PROPERTY PROFILE Account#: R4704586 Parcel#: 106135000027 Tax Area: 3985 Bordering County: Acres: 158 Township Range Section Quart. Sec. Subdivison Name Block# Lot# 04 - 68 - 35 - 0 - - Owners Name &Address: Property Address: 1-25 AND 389 PARTNERS LTD Street: 5953 DALLAS PARKWAY STE 200 A City: PLANO, TX 75093 Business/Complex: Sales Summary Sale Date Sale Price Deed Type Reception# 12/14/2006 $5,180,000 SWD 3442783 Legal Description 25880 NE4 35 4 68 EXC UPRR RES (2R) Land Valuation Summary Unit of Number of Assessed • Land Type Abst Code Actual Value Measure Units Value Agricultural 4127 Acres 55.3 Agricultural 4127 Acres 102.7 Land Subtotal: 158 $10,562 $3,060 No Buildings on Parcel • http://maps2.merrick.com/W ebsite/W eld/setSgl.asp?cmd=QUERY&DET=PP&pin=106135... 7/2/2008 Weld County, Colorado Page 1 of 3 Weld County, Colorado 85 14 ' 4 52 71 {' 34 ' ed 5 ; , } x 1. al a5 kv � M1gin m • • ._ *r a ; • 1 . owenv . y �, . • s' 4 I a _ ' 3 , tt lu S.MEAD C� Y' #° : tE tt aaueew :. W •Corny.Colorado p lx: -r nib' • http://maps2.merrick.com/MerricklMS/ims?ServiceName=weldovr&Form=True&Encode=... 7/2/2008 • AFFIDAVIT OF INTERESTED LAND OWNERS SURFACE ESTATE Subject Parcel: 106135200028 THE UNDERSIGNED, states that to the best of his or her knowledge the attached list is a true and accurate list of the names, addresses, and the corresponding Parcel Identification Number assigned by the Weld County Assessor of the owners of the property(the surface estate)within 500 feet of the property being considered. This list was compiled utilizing the records of the Weld County Assessor available on the Weld County Internet Mapping site, http://www.co.weld.co.us, and has not been modified from the original. The list compiled from the records of the Weld County Assessor was assembled within thirty days of the application's submission date. Jennifer hephrd,'said Undersigned`and Marketing Resource Specialist with SECURITY TITLE GUARANTY CO; Compiledlist l st utilizing the records of the Weld County Assessor available on the Weld County Internet Mapping Signature site,http://www.co.weld.co.us,and has not been modified from the original.The list compiled from the records of the Weld County Assessor was assembled on July 02,2008 at 3:00pm.Parcel#106135200028 ' vTunmcbLAQ egia.plutrQ, 7 ( �CbB_ �P'� Jennifer A.Shepherd T Date Marketing Resource Specialist at SECURITY TITLE GUARANTY CO. 343 W.Drake Road,Suite 200,Fort Collins,CO 80526,OFFICE:970.226.1901 FAX:970-225.6088 Property Owners Within 500 ft. of Parcel# 106135200028 NAME MAILING ADDRESS PARCEL IDENTIFICATION# • 18199E 160 COYLE ROBERT WILLIAM 106134000027 BRIGHTON,CO 80601 FRONT RANGE INVESTMENT ATTN: JAY PHILP HOLDINGS LLC PO BOX 88198 106126200004 TUKWILA,WA 98138-2198 5953 DALLAS PARKWAY STE FID PATH GROWTH PARTNERS 200 A • 106135200029 LTD PLANO,TX 75093 5953 DALLAS PARKWAY STE I-25 AND 389 PARTNERS LID 200 A 106135000027 PLANO,TX 75093 7785 HIGHLAND MEADOWS RC INVESTMENTS LLC PKWY STE 100 106127000013 FORT COLLINS,CO 80528 • AFFIDAVIT OF INTERESTED LAND OWNERS Page 1 of 1 • AFFIDAVIT OF INTERESTED LAND OWNERS _SURFACE ESTATE Subject Parcel: 106135200028 THE UNDERSIGNED, states that to the best of his or her knowledge the attached list is a true and accurate list of the names, addresses, and the corresponding Parcel Identification Number assigned by the Weld County Assessor of the owners of the property (the surface estate) within 500 feet of the property being considered. This list was compiled utilizing the records of the Weld County Assessor available on the Weld County Internet Mapping site, http://www.co.weld.co.us, and has not been modified from the original. The list compiled from the records of the Weld County Assessor was assembled within thirty days of the application's submission date. Signature Date Property Owners Within 500 ft. of Parcel# 1061. 3.5200028 NAME MAILING ADDRESS PARCEL IDENTIFICATION # • 18199E 160 COYLE ROBERT WILLIAM 106134000027 BRIGHTON,CO 80601 FRONT RANGE INVESTMENT ATTN: JAY PHILP HOLDINGS LLC PO BOX 88198 106126200004 TUKWILA,WA 98138-2198 5953 DALLAS PARKWAY STE HD PATH GROWTH PARTNERS 200 A 106135200029 LTD PLANO,TX 75093 5953 DALLAS PARKWAY STE 1-25 AND 389 PARTNERS LTD 200 A 106135000027 PLANO,TX 75093 7785 HIGHLAND MEADOWS RC INVESTMENTS LLC PKWY STE 100 106127000013 FORT COLLINS,CO 80528 • http://maps2.merrick.com/website/weld/setsgl.asp 7/2/2008 Identify Results Page 1 of 1 WELD COUNTY ASSESSOR • PROPERTY PROFILE Account#: R2576403 Parcel#: 106135200028 Tax Area: 3989 Bordering County: Acres: 96.13 Township Range Section Quart. Sec. Subdivison Name Block# Lot# 04 - 68 - 35 - 2 - - Owners Name&Address: Property Address: I-25 AND 389 PARTNERS LTD (75% INT) Street: WELD 5953 DALLAS PARKWAY STE 200 A City: WELD PLANO, TX 75093 Additional Owners: ENGEL RICHARD L(25% INT) Business/Complex: Sales Summary Sale Date Sale Price Deed Type Reception# 12/14/2006 $5,180,000 SWD 3442783 Legal Description PT NW4 35-4-68 BEG NE COR NW4 589D0TW 2621.76' S0D24'W 1628.83' N89D07'E 2621.06' NOD26'E 1628.84'TO POB (1.87R)WELD • Land Valuation Summary Land 7 e Abst Code Unit of Number of Assessed yP Measure Units Actual Value Value Agricultural 4127 Acres 81.13 Agricultural 4127 Acres 15 Land Subtotal: 96.13 $6,271 $1,820 No Buildings on Parcel • http://maps2.merrick.com/W ebsite/Weld/setSgl.asp?cmd=QUERY&DET=PP&pin=10613 5... 7/2/2008 Weld County, Colorado Page 1 of 3 Weld County, Colorado • /. 85.. 71 14 52 71 nw FI; 34 e` P 25 66 " , , .. JOHNSTOWN t i . " ,_ U BERTHOUD ' � , -1 ,, T fl S 9 .a''' • owmw: • — a . y 7{ Y . , A 1 e D I t_ a �ji ,, �., . ., Gi i_ omeew 1'r'1 '+r!"'%'^S " :0 3000ti- • http://maps2.merrick.com/Merrickl MS/ims?ServiceName=weldovr&Form=True&Encode=... 7/2/2008 AFFIDAVIT OF INTERESTED LAND OWNERS SURFACE ESTATE iS • ct Parcel: 106135000004 UNDERSIGNED, states that to the best of his or her knowledge the attached list is a true and accurate list of the names, addresses, and the corresponding Parcel Identification Number assigned by the Weld County Assessor of the owners of the property (the surface estate) within 500 feet of the property being considered. This list was compiled utilizing the records of the Weld County Assessor available on the Weld County Internet Mapping site, http://www.co.weld.co.us, and has not been modified from the original. The list compiled from the records of the Welc County Assessor was assembled within thirty days of the application's submission date. JJJ `/ Todd J.Gilchrist,Business Development Manager with SECURITYTITLE GUARANTY CO., /�o/1 "% compiled this list on-line at the Weld County Assessor's/Weld County Internet Mapping official web-sites,http://www.co.weld.co.us/departments/assessor/index.html. The information/data ignature automatically displayed on the web-site has not been modified in any manner. The list was assembled is °i d y of Ju y,2008. - 7. 7 6 Todd J.Gil nst Date .Business Development Manager/Security Title Guaranty Co. • 343 W.Drake Rd.,Suite 200,Fort Collins,CO.80526/P:(970)226-1901 Property Owners Within 500 ft. of Parcel# 106135000004 NAME PARCEL IDENTIFICATION MAILING ADDRESS AMERICAN TELEPHONE&TELEGRAPH 106135000002 CO STATE ASSESSED, *RICAN TELEPHONE & TELEGRAPH 106135000003 STATE ASSESSED, BACKLUND LEONORA WILLSON (51%INT) 2621 WISTERIA CT GRAND JUNCTION,CO 81506- 120702200055 Additional Owners: 8528 BRODERICK SARAH S (49% INT) CENTRAL WELD COUNTY WATER DISTRICT & 2235 2 AVE 106135000005 • Additional Owners: GREELEY,CO 80631 LITTLE THOMPSON WATER DISTRICT 5953 DALLAS PARKWAY STE 200 HD PATH GROWTH PARTNERS LTD A 106135200029 PLANO,TX 75093 5953 DALLAS PARKWAY STE 200 1-25 AND 389 PARTNERS LTD A 106135000026 PLANO,TX 75093 5953 DALLAS PARKWAY STE 200 1-25 AND 389 PARTNERS LTD A 106135000027 gib PLANO,TX 75093 MARKOFF JOSEPH & 120702000037 Additional Owners: 6989 ESTES DR MARKOFF JAMES A & MARKOFF WILLIAM E & ARVADA,CO 80004 ROTELLO HELEN A& WILSON SANDRA L PO BOX 38 SF LLC 120703000025 BERTHOUD,CO 80513 OLSON GILMAN E (HEIRS OF) & PO BOX 38 120702000036 Additional Owners: MARGARET B TRUSTEE BERTHOUD,CO 80513 PO BOX 38 OLSON MARGIL TRUST 106134000029 BERTHOUD,CO 80513 VETTER TOME & 4700 CR 38 120702000038 Additional Owners: VETTER NANCY D PLATTEVILLE,CO 80651 VIDER TIMOTHY HUGH & 4200 CR 38 120702200054 Additional Owners: PLATTEVILLE,CO 80651 VIDER DIANA LYNN • • !8.. 27 �= y`�-I BERTHOUD26 �rt.,..;.?., * ii ,', . A z YYYp **St"'R' ,„I '3 X31.19T}Y . 1 i E d a 1� au; - 3g a..' HSH,, ,4p7-L MUM,�L. �h'�'� L_ �,7 4 =Ell I 1 r ham 1 �-c'� .44° ` s `l / II- I • �'t l�#4'`` J- f ter` .. k 0 AFFIDAVIT OF INTERESTED LAND OWNERS SURFACE ESTATE iict Parcel: 106135200029 UNDERSIGNED, states that to the best of his or her knowledge the attached list is a true and accurate list of the names, addresses, and the corresponding Parcel Identification Number assigned by the Weld County Assessor of the owners of the property (the surface estate) within 500 feet of the property being considered. This list was compiled utilizing the records of the Weld County Assessor available on the Weld County Internet Mapping site, http://www.co.weld.co.us, and has not been modified from the original. The list compiled from the records of the Weld County Assessor was assembled within thirty days of the application's submission date. :Todd J.Gilchrist,Business Development Manager with SECURITY TITLE GUARANTY CO., ash/141 compiled this list on-line at the Weld County Assessor's/Weld County Internet Mapping official web-sites,http://www.co.weld.co.us/departments/assessor/index.html. The information/dataignature automatically displayed on the web-site has not been modified in any manner. The list was assembled this 7th day ooff�July,2008. 7-7 a7J/I Date Todd J.Gi tnst"" 1 Business Development Manager/Security Title Guaranty Co. 343 W.Drake Rd.,Suite 200,Fort Collins,CO.80526/P:(970)226-1901 Property Owners Within 500 ft. of Parcel# 106135200029 NAME MAILING ADDRESS PARCEL IDENTIFICATION AMERICAN TELEPHONE &TELEGRAPH 106135000002 CO STATE ASSESSED, RICAN TELEPHONE &TELEGRAPH 106135000003 STATE ASSESSED, 18199E 160 COYLE ROBERT WILLIAM 106134000027 BRIGHTON,CO 80601 5953 DALLAS PARKWAY STE 200 HD PATH GROWTH PARTNERS LTD A 106135000004 PLANO,TX 75093 5953 DALLAS PARKWAY STE 200 I-25 AND 389 PARTNERS LTD A 106135000026 PLANO,TX 75093 5953 DALLAS PARKWAY STE 200 I-25 AND 389 PARTNERS LTD A 106135000027 PLANO,TX 75093 I-25 AND 389 PARTNERS LTD (75% INT) 5953 DALLAS PARKWAY STE 200 A 106135200028 Additional Owners: ENGEL RICHARD L (25% NT) PLANO,TX 75093 835 E HWY 56 „LE THOMPSON WATER DISTRICT 106134000026 BERTHOUD,CO 80513 POBOX38 OLSON MARGIL TRUST 106134000029 BERTHOUD,CO 80513 y , 2 tF "Z , . 1 } �T t.✓ t4 M f M1 ,, ::,.„,),,,,,,,,,,:,:::„.„:„-„,...s.-_,,,,,, ::::::::::';:i.,.,,iefi,;::,,,,,,,:,,,,,!,, ,:,,,..,... :, -:.,,,,,7,„, WNBBW m �.._ ,e sy t 7n ' 5"+�. .. , ii 1 ,„ r f 10 0 Envelopes for Mailing Notices Have Been Included With the Original Submittal • TOWN OF MEAD Standard Form Certificates And Signature Blocks For Annexation Maps The Annexation Map shall contain on its face the following certificates.Text is to be 12 pt.(0.16608")AutoCAD Roman Simplex,Helvetica,Arial or similar san serf type.Add signature lines to the Certificate of Ownership and spaces in the Notary Certificate as necessary for multiple owners.Add additional Notary Certificates as necessary for out-of-town signatories.Remove extra titles and signature lines in the Certificate of Ownership and spaces in the Notary Certificate as appropriate.The certificates are to be placed in columns not more than 6 2"in width.If multiple columns are required,separate the columns by 1". Certificate of Ownership. Know all men by these presents that HD Path of Growth Partners, Ltd. & 1-25&389 Pariners.Ltd. being the Owner(s),Mortgagee or Lienholder of certain lands in Weld County,Colorado, have herewith petitioned to the Town of Mead for the annexation of the property being described as follows: PROPERTY DESCRIPTION THE WEST HALF OF SECTION 35 AND THE SOUTHERLY 30 FEET OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 26, TOWN .HIP 4 NORTH, RANGE 68 WEST OF THE 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN AND THE NORTHERLY 30 FEET OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 2, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 68 WEST OF THE 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, WELD COUNTY, COLORADO. LESS AND EXCEPT PARCELS DESCRIBED AT RECEPTION NO. 1505381, AT BOOK 1041, PAGE 278 AND AT BOOK 1528, PAGE 526, RECORDED AT THE WELD COUNTY CLERK & RECORDER'S OFFICE. • AND ALSO THE EAST HALF OF SECTION 35 AND THE SOUTHERLY 30 FEET OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 26, TOWNSHIP 4 NORTH, RANGE 68 WEST OF THE 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN AND THE NORTHERLY 30 FEET OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 2, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 68 WEST OF THE 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, WELD COUNTY, COLORADO. LESS AND EXCEPT THE EASTERLY 30 FEET OF THE EAST HALF OF SAID SECTION 35, THE EASTERLY 30 FEET OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 2, THE EASTERLY 30 FEET OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 2 AND A PARCEL DESCRIBED AT RECEPTION NO. 02204895, RECORDED AT THE AT THE WELD COUNTY CLERK & RECORDER'S OFFICE. CONTAINING 26,206,407 SQUARE FEET, (601.616 ACRES), MORE OR LESS, TOGETHER WITH AND SUBJECT '10 ALL EASEMENTS AND RIGHT OF WAYS EXISTING AND/OR OF PUBLIC RECORD. Thus described tract contains 601.6 acres more or less,together with and subject to all easements and rights-of-way existing and/or of public record. • HIGH POINT AT MEAD-ANNEX X PLAT CERTIFICATES(FORMS)DOC 1/'3/07(3 03 pm) Page 1 of 4 • ,y Executed th•s '=day of /144 ,20(x. 'Alit'.(..Gds✓ _, ...cc 1vs,.:•...71.c•,.•.-- Benson Armistead,Director of Asset Management HD Path of Growth Partners..Ltd. by HDC Partners GP.LLQ1'general pa r r : G cr.:+.(1,r.� i../. ( . -; mot.. Benson Armistead,Director of Asset Management 1-25 and 389 Partners, Ltd. by Lanterra Interest,LLC,general partner State of Texas ) ss County of Collin ) The foregoing certificate of own r F was acknowledgec before me by 5.0 r\ pk-rr►�t and this % ay of , 20 0 t � Witness My Hand and Sea _ QQ` ill -"'(-)l4 ^'NOI Pu lic 0 4 My commission expires r'`‘ t .0 it 4-O k State of Texas ) C�!,; (1A�J PEYit]N AV MAMMON WIRES Ili ! ss _' Aprl20,1012 County of Collin ) " `` .a. y-.- a- •••• The foregoing certificate of own rs�was acknowledged before me by rl A $6 and this t 'day of KNe4., ,20_ Witness My Hand and Seal i_.a0L4-x �v-` 4o Pl�lic My commission expires '�1 o-O • < �&b OALJ.PEYTON • is . MY 6301.4B1301DPFIES Apd 20,9012 IIIHIGH POINT AT MEAD•ANNEX&PLAT CERTIFICATES(Forms)DOC 1/13107(303 pm) Page 2 of 4 • Surveying C$errtificate. I % 6� ,a registered Professional Land Surveyor in the State of Colorado,do hereby certify that the Annexation Map shown hereon is a correct delineation of the above described parcel of land and that at least one-sixth t/6)of the peripheral boundary of said parcel is contiguous to the present boundary of the Town of Mead. 4,315.02. feet contiguous,perimeter 2$,317.71 feet I further certify that this map and legal description were prepa -. nder my personal supervision on this I day of Yut' ,20 O Nay.,•..., O► stl ( ........ Sit ite 'r by V ®PWE Gyf'•• ! (SEAL) aI iaa4 t.A.�' • HIGH POINT AT MEAD-ANNEX 8 PLAT CERTIFICATES(FORMS)DOC 1/13/07(3:03 pm) Page 3 of 4 • • Planning Commission Certificate. Reviewed by the Mead Planning Commission this day of 20 Attest. Chairman Planning Commission Secretary Certificate of Approval by the Board of Trustees. This annexation map of the A Annexation to the Town of Mead@ is approved and accepted by Ordinance No. ,passed and adopted at the regular meeting of the Board of Trustees of Mead,Colorado, held on , 20_, and recorded on as Reception No. , in the records of the Clerk and Recorder of Weld County,Colorado by the Boe:rd of Trustees of Mead,Colorado. Attest: Mayor Town Clerk Recorder's Certificate. This Annexation Map was filed for record in the office of the County Clerk and Recorder of Weld County at _ o'clock, M.,on the_day of A.D., 20_, in the book page, , map reception no. Weld County Clerk and Recorder by: Deputy CONCEPT PLAN(MAP) Modified Standard Form Signature Blocks Planning Commission Certificate. Reviewed by the Mead Planning Commission this day of ,20_. Attest. Chairman Planning Commission Secretary Certificate of Concept Plan Approval by the Board of Trustees. This Concept Plan map of the A @ is approved and accepted by Resolution No. ,passed and adopted at the regular meeting of the Board of Trustees of Mead, Colorado, held on ,20_,by the Board of Trustees of Mead,Colorado. Attest: Mayor Town Clerk • HIGH POINT AT MEAL)-ANNEX&PLAT CERTIFICATES(FOR:IS) 1/13/07(3 03 pm) Page 4 of 4 • To be Completed TOWN OF MEAD by Surveyor or Annexation Map Engineer. Land Surveying Standards Name of Annexation: High Point at Mead Surveyor: John B. Guyton, PLS Date Initials Items 07-01-08 JBG 1. A scale drawing of the boundaries of the land parcel. 07-01-08 JBG 2. All recorded and apparent rights-of-way and easements,and,if research for recorded rights-of-way and easements is done by someone other than the professional land surveyor who prepares the plat,the source from which such recorded rights-of-way and easements were obtained. 07-01-08 JBG 3. All dimensions necessary to establish the boundaries in the field.(The dimensions must be shown to all control monuments used in the field survey.If the boundary runs down a line or parallels a line,the dimensions to get from the control line or monuments to the parcel must be shown.Dimensions to both ends of the control line must be shown.) 07-01-08 JBG 4. A statement by the professional land surveyor that the survey was performed by such surveyor or under such surveyor's responsible charge. 07-01-08 JBG 5. A statement by the professional land surveyor explaining how bearings,if used,were determined 04/16/08 JBG 6. A description of all monuments,both found and set,which mark the boundaries of the property and of all control monuments used in conducting the survey.(Monuments such as section corners are control monuments.If you are running down a line or paralleling a line,the monuments at both ends of the line must be shown. It must be labeled on the map or plat if a monument is found or set.) 04/16/08 JBG 7. A statement of the scale or representative fraction of the drawing,and a bar-type or graphical scale 07-01-08 JBG 8. A north arrow. 07-01-08 JBG 9. A written property description,which shall include but shall not be limited to a reference to the county and state together with the section,township,range,and principal meridian or established subdivision,block and • lot number,or any other method of describing the land as established by the general land office or bureau of land management.(Property description is to be written in upper case type.) 07-01-08 JBG 10. Any conflicting boundary evidence.Ties to and descriptions of all conflicting corners are shown. 07-01-08 JOG 11. Location map.Minimum one and one-half mile radius of the property with principal roads labeled. 07-01-08 JOG 12. Certificate block-based on the Town's standard certificates for annexation maps. 07-01-08 JBG 13. The signature and seal of the professional land surveyor. Initials of draftsperson,date of drawing and AutoCAD file name. 07-01-08 JBG 14. All calculations have been double checked on final map for any errors,transpositions,the sum of the parts equals the total length,etc. 07-01-0B JBG 15. Corner recordations have been made,or what is found in the field is identical with a previously filed corner recordation.Corner recordations have to be filed on all sections,'/4 section and aliquot corners of a section. 07-01-08 JBG 16. Dimensions of lots and area of the lot are to be placed inside the lot,dimensions of blocks or parameters of polygons are to be placed outside the block or polygon.Widths of roads,and easements are to be placed between the r.o.w.lines when possible. Dimensions must clearly indicate the terminus point at each end. Curve data may be presented in tabular form,or with leader dimension lines. 07-01-08 JOG 17. All text and numbers are to be large enough to clearly legible at the scale drawn.Paragraph text,legal descriptions and certificates are to be in 12 pt.(0.16608")AutoCADTM Roman Simplex,Helvetica,Arial or See similar"san serf"type.Title of plat is to be centered at top of the plat in type not less than.3"high. Note Below 07-01-08 JBG 18.An AutoCADTM drawing file(Release 14-2002)of the map,x-refs and all font files used,on 3 V"IBM formatted disk is to be provided.A word processing file of the legal description on 3 Y2"IBM formatted disk is to See be provided(Word Perfect 6.1 preferred). Note Below INSTRUCTIONS 1. This checklist is required to be completed by the responsible surveyor or engineer and submitted with the annexation map. 2. The completed check list is to be maintained in the Applicant's File. 3. Items#1 through 10 refer to C.R.S.38-51-106,Surveying statutes. Official Use Only Reviewed by: Date: • NOTE:TEXT RESTRAINTS STATED IN ITEM 17.WERE NOT COMPLETELY MET. BECAUSE FLATIRONS,INC.WANTED THE ENTIRE ANNEXATION MAP ON ONE SHEET WE DETERMINED IT WOULD BE BEST TO CHANGE THE TEXT SIZE OF THE OWNERS CERTIFICATE DUE TO THE LENGTH OF THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION. JOE GERDOM WITH THE TOWN OF MEAD STATED ON 04/16/08 THAT THIS WAS ACCEPTABLE.INFORMATION REQUIRED IN ITEM NO. 18 HAS BEEN PUT ON A CD INSTEAD OF A 3 1/"FLOPPY DISK. LARGE MAPS AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING AT THE CLERK TO THE BOARD'S OFFICE, IN THE PUBLIC REVIEW FILE. CH2M HILL 8191 South Jamaica Street Denver,CO 80112 illTel 303.771.0900 CH2MHILL Fax 720.286.8250 May 19,2008 Mead Board of Trustees Town of Mead P.O. Box 626 Mead,CO 80542 Northern Colorado Water Conservancy District Petition Dear Town Board Members: The High Point at Mead property located in the south half of Section 26 and a portion of Section 35, Township 4 North, Range 68 West,6TH P.M. as well as a portion of the north half of Section 2, Township 3 North, Range 68 West, 6th P.M is located within the boundaries of the Northern Colorado Water Conservancy District(NCWCD). A letter from the NCWCD stating the aforementioned has been included. • Sincerely, 2C26r Attachments: NCWCD Letter • ,4444, Northern Colorado Water Conservancy District• 220 Water Avenue • Berthoud, CO 80513 • 470-532-7700 • (ax 97O532 O942 March 6, 2008 Mr. Brett Schlanger CH2M HILL 9193 South Jamaica Street Denver, CO 80112 Dear Mr. Schlanger: As requested, this letter will confirm that lands owned by the Avex Group located in the N'%of Section 2, Township 3 North, Range 68 West and in S'h of Section 26 and a portion of Section 35, Township 4 North, Range 68 West are located within the boundaries of the Northern Colorado Water Conservancy District. If you have any questions, please feel free to call me at 970-622-2216 • Sincerely, /4 air Marilyn L. Conley Allotment Contracts Manager 1p • • High Point at Mead Annexation Impact Report Mead, Colorado • Prepared for: HD Path of Growth Partners, Ltd. & 1-25 and 389 Partners, Ltd. 5953 Dallas Parkway, Suite 200-A Plano, TX 75093 Prepared by: CH2M HILL, Inc. 9191 South Jamaica Street Englewood, CO 80112-5946 CH2MHILL Project No. 368816 CH2MHILL May 2008 • ANNEXATION IMPACT REPORT ACKNOWLDGEMENT This report for High Point at Mead was prepared by me or under my direct supervision in accordance with the provisions of the Town of Mead Standards for the owners thereof. Joshua S. Ho er Registered Fjfofessional Engineer State of Colorado N10.939335 Date MPS For and on behalf of CH2M HILL • High Point at Mead Annexation Impact Report 2 • High Point at Mead Annexation Impact Report General Site Location and Description The High Point at Mead (Site) is located in unincorporated Weld County, at the northeast corner of Interstate-25 (I-25) and County Road 38 (CR 38) and bound by future CR 11 to the east and future CR 40 to the north. The property contains a portion of the south half of Section 26 and a portion of Section 35,Township 4 North, Range 68 West, 6TH P.M. as well as a portion of the north half of Section 2, Township 3 North, Range 68 West, 6th P.M. The 595 acre development will consist of single family and multi-family residential, commercial, open space and mixed use development. Extension to Municipal Services Water Service The High Point at Mead property is located within the Little Thompson Water District (LTWD). The applicant is in discussion with the LTWD and will obtain an agreement to serve the site prior to final approval. The LTWD has several waterlines and a water vault located at the south west corner of the Site. The likely point of connection will be • established in this corner north of CR 38. In order to ensure the proposed demands are met the ultimate decision for the point of connection will be determined by the LTWD. Sewer Service The High Point at Mead property is located within the Town of Mead Sewer boundaries. The applicant has been in discussion with the Town of Mead Sewer and has received a 'will serve'letter for the property. The Town of Mead is currently constructing a new wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) which will serve the property. The WWTP will be located south of the Site along CR 34. The applicant has been in discussion with Jim Wright of JB Wright & Associates concerning the point of connection to the new WWTP. The proposed point of connection will likely be at the northeast corner of I-25 and CR 34 which will tie into a 21" RCP that discharges to the WWTP. The unlikely scenario will be for the Site to discharge at the head works of the future WWTP. A finalized design report will fully analyze both scenarios and take into consideration any recommendations from the Town of Mead. Fire protection The proposed Site is bisected by the Johnstown/Mountain View Fire District boundary line. However, an intergovernmental agreement with the Town of Mead that basically whatever is annexed into the Town of Mead will be serviced by the Mountain View Fire District. The • applicant has contacted Randy Templeton, Mountain View Fire Chief and has received a 'will serve'letter for the proposed Site. High Point at Mead Annexation Impact Report 3 • Electric The electric service to the Site will be provided by United Power. The applicant has contacted Monica Hansen, District Representative and has received a 'will serve'letter for the proposed Site. Natural Gas The natural gas provider of the Site will be SourceGas. The applicant has contacted Joe Valdez, the regional SourceGas representative and has received a 'will serve' letter for the proposed Site. Telephone The telephone and communication systems will be provided by Qwest. The applicant has contacted Bart Garner, Field Engineer and has received a 'will serve' letter for the proposed Site. Law Enforcement The High Point at Mead property is currently under the protection of the Weld County • Sheriff's Department. Upon annexation, law enforcement will be provided by the Town of Mead through its contract with the Weld County Sheriff's Department. Municipal Extensions As of the first submittal for the annexation to the Town of Mead it is uncertain of any plans of the municipality for extending to or otherwise providing for within High Point at Mead. The method under which the municipality plans to finance the extension of the municipal services into the area to be annexed is also uncertain at the time of first submittal • High Point at Mead Annexation Impact Report 4 • Local Public School Impacts The High Point at Mead property is bisected in the east/west direction by the Johnstown/St. Vrain Valley School District boundary line. The discussions with both districts have led to the understanding that the Site will likely be served by both school districts. The respective yield rates for each district have been utilized in the following tables to calculate the approximate number of students generated at full build out. Johnstown School District Impact Current Standard Percent of Number of Units, Yield Rate Projected Student Yield Facility Facility Standard Occupancy Capacity Capacity Single Multi- Sin le Famil Multi- Family Family g y Family Single Family Multi-Family, Elementary 518 200 0.345 0.177 178/ 35.4 550 550 38.9% Middle 518 200 0.17 0.087 88.1 17.4 550 550 19.2% School High 518 200 0.195 0.1 101 2 School 0 700 1000 12.1% lIll Total 0.71 0.364 368 73 1. The school district boundary line bisects the High Point at Mead property therefore the total number of units is halved. 2. The multi-family(ME)yield rates are based on the ratio of the MF occupancy rate of 1.9 to the single family(SF)occupancy rate of 3.7 multiplied by the SF yield rate. St.Vrain School District Impact Current Standard Percent of Number of Units, Yield Rate Projected Student Yield Facility Facility Standard Occupancy Capacity Capacity Single Multi- Single Family Multi Family Family Family Single Family Multi-Family Elementary 518 200 0.22 0.15 114.0 30 483 525 26.0% Middle 518 200 0.1 D.06 School 51.8 12 645 750 8.1 High School 518 200 0.11 0.06 57 12 1308 1200 5.5% Total 0.43 0.27 223 54 1. The school district boundary line bisects the High Point at Mead property therefore the total number of units is halved. • High Point at Mead Annexation Impact Report 5 LARGE MAPS AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING AT THE CLERK TO THE BOARD'S OFFICE, IN THE PUBLIC REVIEW FILE. Preliminary Geotechnical Subsurface Exploration And Limited Geologic Study Proposed Development Weld County Road 38 and Interstate 25 Weld County, Colorado • Prepared for: Avex Group 14875 Landmark Boulevard, Suite 306 Dallas, TX 75254 Attention: Mr. Ben Armistead Job Number 08-0009 April 15, 2008 e GROUPID ENGINEERING CONSUITRNTS, INC. 41 Inverness Drive East, Englewood, CO 80112-5412 Phone (303) 289-1989 Fax (303)289-1686 www.groundeng.com Office Locations: Englewood Commerce City • Loveland • Granby • Gypsum • TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Purpose and Scope of Study 1 Proposed Construction 2 Site Conditions 2 Geologic Setting 2 Geologic Hazards 3 Subsurface Exploration 7 Laboratory Testing 8 Subsurface Conditions 8 Anticipated Foundation Systems 9 Anticipated Floor Systems 10 Water-Soluble Sulfates 11 Soil Corrosivity 11 Site Grading 14 Excavation Considerations 17 • Utility Recommendations 18 Surface Drainage Recommendations 19 Underdrain/Subsurface Moisture Infiltration 21 Preliminary Pavement Recommendations 22 Additional Exploration Requirements 23 Closure 23 Site Map Figure 1 Logs of Test Holes Figures 2 through 4 Legend and Notes Figure 5 Swell Consolidation Test Results Figures 6 through 17 Compaction Test Report Figure 18 Summary of Laboratory Test Results Tables 1 and 2 • Proposed Development Weld County Road 38 and Interstate 25 Weld County, Colorado • PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF STUDY This report presents the results of a geotechnical evaluation performed by GROUND Engineering Consultants, Inc. (GROUND) to provide preliminary geotechnical recommendations for the proposed approximate 640-acre development to be located near the northeast corner of the intersection of Weld County Road 38 and Interstate 25, in Weld County, Colorado. Our study was conducted in general accordance with GROUND's Proposal No. 0801-0107, dated March 10, 2008. Any prospective buyer or future ownership must be made aware of and must agree to the terms, conditions, and liability limitations outlined in the proposal. Field and office studies provided information regarding surface and subsurface conditions, including depths to bedrock. Material samples retrieved during the subsurface exploration were tested in our laboratory to assess the engineering characteristics of the site earth materials, and assist in the development of our preliminary geotechnical recommendations. Results of the field, office, and laboratory . studies are presented below. This report has been prepared to summarize the data obtained and to present our conclusions and preliminary recommendations based on the proposed development and the subsurface conditions encountered. Preliminary design parameters and a discussion of geotechnical engineering considerations related to the construction of the proposed development are included. When final structure types, location(s), and dimensions are known, lot/parcel-specific final geotechnical subsurface exploration programs must be performed in order to confirm the preliminary recommendations provided as well as to provide additional, detailed, building-specific design information. Additionally, detailed subsurface explorations will be necessary in order to provide pavement design recommendations for the private and public paved areas upon completion of near final site grading. This report should not be used for detailed design purposes. • Job No. 08-0009 GROUND Engineering Consultants,Inc. Page 1 Proposed Development Weld County Road 38 and Interstate 25 Weld County, Colorado • PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION No details regarding the proposed construction on this property were available for review at this time. Detailed grading plans, development plans, and final building layouts and roadway construction details had not yet been prepared. SITE CONDITIONS At the time of our exploration, the site generally existed as vacant land that appeared to have been used for agricultural purposes in the past. Several existing gas/oil wells and tank facilities existed throughout the site. At the time of our subsurface exploration, the approximately northeast quarter of the site was -_ - — being utilized for agricultural purposes. An - existing concrete lined canal/ditch traversed • the approximate southeast quarter of the site. A significant amount of water was observed flowing in this canal/ditch at the time of our subsurface exploration. The topography of the site was relatively flat to gently rolling. The northwestern and southeastern portions of the site were gently rolling with elevation differences of approximately 15 feet or more. The maximum elevation difference across the site was approximately 30 feet or more. The site was bordered by the frontage road for Interstate 25 to the west, Weld County Road 40 to the north, Weld County Road 38 to the south and vacant/agricultural land to the east. GEOLOGIC SETTING The subject parcel lies within the Denver Basin geologic province that consists largely of a sequence of sedimentary rock formations deposited and preserved in a structural depression in north-central Colorado. In the general project area, these sedimentary rocks dip eastward at low angles (less than 10 degrees, typically) and are overlain by a variety of surficial deposits including alluvial (stream-laid) sediments, eolian (wind-blown) materials and colluvial (slope-wash) deposits. • Job No.08-0009 GROUND Engineering Consultants,Inc. Page 2 Proposed Development Weld County Road 38 and Interstate 25 Weld County, Colorado • Published maps, e.g. Tweto (19791), depict the site as underlain by Upper Pleistocene Eolian deposits, underlain in turn by strata of the upper Cretaceous Pierre Shale Formation (Upper Member). In the northern Colorado Front Range, the Upper Member of the Pierre Shale consists largely of clay shales and claystones that typically are moderately to highly expansive. Sandstones are encountered locally and in greater abundance than reported by available publications. The bedrock materials encountered in the test holes are interpreted to be Pierre Shale materials. The shallow sands and clays are interpreted to be severely weathered eolian soils. GEOLOGIC HAZARDS Expansive Soils The shallow earth materials underlying the site included sand and clay overburden materials and claystone bedrock with interbedded lenses and layers of sandstone and siltstone bedrock. Swelling clayey soils and bedrock change volume in response to changes in moisture content that can occur seasonally, or in response to changes in land use, including development. Expansion potentials vary with moisture contents, density and details of the clay chemistry and mineralogy. The swell potential • in any particular area can vary markedly both laterally and vertically due to the complex interbedding of the site soil and bedrock materials. Moisture changes also occur erratically, resulting in conditions that cannot always be predicted. The site soils were low to highly plastic (see Table 1). Swell-consolidation testing indicated low potentials for expansion in the overburden clays and low to high potentials for expansion in the claystone bedrock. Our experience in the project area indicates that the surficial clays and claystones of the Pierre Shale typically are moderately to highly expansive. There is a significant amount of risk involved where structures are placed on these types of soils. However, with appropriate geotechnical design, properly implemented during construction, the proposed development is feasible with regard to expansive earth materials. It is important that the soil conditions be reviewed on an individual structure basis when the site-building layout is known so that appropriate geotechnical recommendations can be developed. Collapsible Soils Certain surficial deposits in the Front Range area, typically eolian (wind-blown) materials including loess, are known to be susceptible to local hydro- Tweto, O., 1979, Geologic Map of Colorado, U.S. Geological Survey. Job No.08-0009 GROUND Engineering Consultants,Inc. Page 3 Proposed Development Weld County Road 38 and Interstate 25 Weld County, Colorado • consolidation or "collapse." Hydro-consolidation consists of a significant volume loss due to re-structuring of the constituent grains of the soil to a more compact arrangement upon wetting under a surcharge load. Site surficial soils are interpreted to be eolian materials and the index parameters for some of the site soils assessed for this study fell into the range typically associated with collapsible soils (e.g. Naval Facilities Engineering Command, 1986)2. Swell- consolidation testing indicated moderate to high potentials for hydro-consolidation in the shallow soils (see Table 1). Therefore, the likelihood of encountering collapsible soils on the subject site is considered high overall and moderate at any specific location. Geotechnical evaluations of individual building sites, therefore, should include an assessment of the possible presence of collapsible materials in the foundation soils, so that remedial design and construction can be implemented, where appropriate. Radon Testing for the possible presence of radon gas prior to project development does not yield useful results regarding the potential accumulation of radon in completed structures. Radon accumulations most typically are found in basements or other • enclosed portions of buildings built in areas underlain at relatively shallow depths by granitic crystalline rock. The likelihood of encountering radon in concentrations exceeding applicable health standards on the subject site, underlain by relatively deep soils and sedimentary bedrock, is significantly lower. GROUND recommends that radon testing be performed in each building on-site, after construction is completed. Proper ventilation usually is sufficient to mitigate potential radon accumulations. Building designs should accommodate such ventilation for all building areas. Seismic Activity/Faulting Neither site reconnaissance nor review of available geologic maps indicated the trace of an active or potentially active fault traversing or immediately adjacent to the site. Therefore, the likelihood of surface fault rupture at the site is considered to be low. The closest documented active fault to the site is the Rocky Mountain Arsenal Fault, which is located approximately 25 miles to the south and west (Kirkham and Rogers, • 2 Naval Facilities Engineering Command, 1986, Design Manual 7.01, Soil Mechanics, 348 pp. Job Na 08-0009 GROUND Engineering Consultants,Inc. Page 4 Proposed Development Weld County Road 38 and Interstate 25 Weld County, Colorado • 19813). (Several potentially active faults are mapped approximately 20 miles or more to the northwest.) The Rocky Mountain Arsenal Fault is approximately 15 miles in length, trends generally northwest/southeast and is considered to be a right-lateral, strike-slip fault. The most recent significant seismic movements associated with the fault occurred in the 1960's, generating earthquakes up to magnitude 5.5. Research performed by the U.S. Geological Survey concluded that a strong correlation existed between the seismic activity of this fault and pressure injection of liquid waste into a disposal well located at the nearby Rocky Mountain Arsenal. Pressure injection in the disposal well was discontinued in 1966 and only minor seismic activity along the fault has been recorded since. The risk of this fault, giving rise to damaging, earthquake-induced ground motions at the site is considered to be relatively low given the low previously recorded seismic magnitudes. The project area falls within Seismic Performance Category A based on AASHTO guidelines, and is considered to have a low probability for large, damaging earthquakes. We consider the site to fall within the parameters of a Seismic Site Class D site, in accordance with 2003/2006 IBC. If a quantitative assessment of the classification or • higher seismic site class classification is needed, shear wave velocity testing will be required. A proposal for this work can be provided upon request.) Compared with other regions of Colorado, recorded earthquake frequency in the project area is relatively low. Slope Stability and Erosion Colton and others (1978°; Colton 19785), as well as larger scale geologic maps providing coverage of the site that were reviewed for this study, did not depict landslide deposits on or adjacent to the subject site. During our preliminary reconnaissance of site area, no evidence was noted of mass-wasting processes associated with steep slopes, such as landslides, slumps or unusual soil creep. Therefore, the likelihood of project developments being affected by large scale, unanticipated slope instabilities is considered to be relatively low. However, the site was slightly to moderately hilly, with several tributary streams flowing near the southeastern margin of the property to which several gullies descended. That 3 Kirkham, R.M., and W P. Rogers, 1981, Earthquake Potential in Colorado, A Preliminary Evaluation, Colorado Geological Survey, Bulletin 43. 4 Colton, R.B., J.A. Holligan, and L.W. Anderson, 1975, Preliminary Map of Landslide Deposits, Denver 1°x 2°Quadrangle, Colorado, U.S. Geological Survey, Miscellaneous Field Studies Map MF-705. • 5 Colton, R.B., Geologic Map Of The Boulder-Fort Collins-Greeley Area, Colorado, U.S. Geological Survey, Miscellaneous Investigation Series, Map l-855-G. Job Na 08-0009 GROUND Engineering Consultants,Inc. Page 5 Proposed Development Weld County Road 38 and Interstate 25 Weld County, Colorado • portion of the project should be evaluated in more detail with regard to potentially unstable slopes, once project grading plans have been developed, based on the types of proposed improvements and their proximity to those slopes. Preliminarily, we recommend that un-retained, permanent slope cuts be less than 15 feet in height and maintain a maximum 3:1 (horizontal : vertical) slope angle or less with proper erosion control measures implemented. Proper surface drainage controls to reduce the potential for erosional slope damage need to be implemented in the grading design to control runoff, which may be increased due to proposed pavement surfaces, structures and landscape irrigation. Re-vegetation or other means of protection should be used on graded slopes. Flooding The subject property lies above several active channels of streams that are tributary to the Saint Vrain Creek. Significant fluctuation in the flow of these drainages can be expected during seasonal run periods. Neither the site nor that stream channel, however, is depicted on FEMA (2008)6 as lying within an area of elevated risk of flooding. Therefore, the site does not appear to be vulnerable to flooding, with the • exception of possible local, surface saturation during episodes of heavy rainfall and associated temporary ponding of run-off in areas of relatively slow surface drainage. Wetlands Potential (Explicit designation of wetlands was not included as part of the scope of this study.) Beyond the northwestern margin of the site, a stream channel was noted, but no surface water, typical phreatophytes or other indications of conditions similar jurisdictional wetlands were apparent on the project site, during GROUND's site reconnaissance. However, during site development all regulations concerning wetland protection, as well as any other areas designated as wetlands by the Federal Wetlands Protection Act should be adhered to. Mining Activity and Subsidence Review of U.S. Geological Survey topographic maps covering the site (e.g., U.S.G.S. 1950, revised 1969)' and Jones, and others (1978)8 and other available, published maps depicting areas of coal extraction, did not indicate past mining activities on or adjacent to the subject parcel. No indications of mining activities 6 Federal Emergency Management Administration, 2008, fttp://msc.fema.gov/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/ FemaWelcomeView?storeld=10001&catalogld=10001&langld=l. U.S. Geological Survey, 1950(revised 1969) 7.5 Minute Series(Topographic), Johnstown Quadrangle, Colorado. • e Jones, D.C., J.E. Schultz and D.K. Murray, 1978, Coal Resources and Development Map of Colorado, Colorado Geological Survey, Map Series 9. Job No.08-0009 GROUND Engineering Consultants,Inc. Page 6 Proposed Development Weld County Road 38 and Interstate 25 Weld County, Colorado • were apparent on the site during the site reconnaissance. Therefore, there appears to be little potential for surface subsidence associated with consolidation of former mine workings at depth. Oil/gas production is apparent on this project site, however. Further description of these resources is outside our scope of services. Published geologic maps do not indicate formations underlying the site at shallow depths that include evaporite (salt, gypsum, etc.) deposits, limestones or other materials vulnerable to subsurface dissolution. Therefore, the likelihood of subsidence or other mining-related hazards appears to be low. Based on the published information reviewed for the site and the findings of this preliminary assessment, the site appears to be feasible for development with respect to potential geologic hazards and general geotechnical design concerns. SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION • The subsurface exploration for the project was conducted on March 19, 2008. A total of fifteen (15) test holes were drilled with a truck-mounted, continuous flight power auger rig to evaluate the subsurface conditions as well as to retrieve soil and bedrock samples for laboratory testing and analysis. The test holes were drilled at the approximate locations indicated in Figure 1. A representative of GROUND directed the subsurface exploration, logged the test holes in the field, and prepared the soil samples for transport to our laboratory. Samples of the subsurface materials were taken with a 2-inch I.D. California liner sampler. The sampler was driven into the substrata with blows from a 140-pound hammer falling 30 inches. This procedure is similar to the Standard Penetration Test described by ASTM Method D1586. Penetration resistance values when properly evaluated indicate the relative density or consistency of the soils and bedrock. Depths at which the samples were obtained and associated penetration resistance values are shown on the test hole logs. The approximate locations of the test holes are shown in Figure 1. Logs of the exploratory test holes are presented in Figures 2 through 4. Explanatory notes and a • legend are provided in Figure 5. Job No.08-0009 GROUND Engineering Consultants,Inc. Page 7 Proposed Development Weld County Road 38 and Interstate 25 Weld County, Colorado • LABORATORY TESTING Samples retrieved from our test holes were examined and visually classified in the laboratory by the project engineer. Laboratory testing of soil samples obtained from the subject site included standard property tests, such as natural moisture contents, dry unit weights, grain size analyses, and liquid and plastic limits. Swell-consolidation, unconfined compressive strength, water-soluble sulfate content, and corrosivity tests were performed on selected samples, as well. A compaction test was performed from a composite bulk sample collected from the auger cuttings of the test holes in the upper 0.5 to 4 feet. Laboratory tests were performed in general accordance with applicable ASTM testing procedures. Results of the laboratory-testing program are summarized on Tables 1 and 2. Swell consolidation test results are presented in Figures 6 through 17. Compaction test results are presented in Figure 18. SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS • The subsurface conditions encountered in the test holes generally consisted of a thin layer of topsoil, approximately 2 to 3 inches thick, underlain by sands and clays that extended to variable depths of approximately 6 to 23 feet below the existing grades. These materials were underlain by claystone bedrock that extended to the test hole termination depths of approximately 20 to 50 feet, below existing grades. Man-made fill was not encountered during drilling operations. It is likely that man-made fill exists on this site, however. The exact extents, limits, and composition of the man- made fill were not determined as part of the scope of work addressed by this study, and should be expected to exist at varying depths and locations across the site. Groundwater was encountered in Test Hole 7, located just north of the irrigation ditch, at a depth of 15 feet below the below existing grades, at the time of drilling. Groundwater was not encountered in any other test holes at the time of drilling to the depths explored. Groundwater levels will fluctuate, however, in response to annual and longer-term cycles of precipitation, irrigation, surface drainage, land use, proximity to the existing creek/drainage ditch, and the development of transient, perched water conditions. • Job Na 08-0009 GROUND Engineering Consultants,Inc. Page 8 Proposed Development Weld County Road 38 and Interstate 25 Weld County, Colorado • Sands and clays typically classified as lean slightly sandy to sandy clays with localized layers and lenses of clayey and/or silty sands. They were generally fine to medium grained, low to highly plastic, loose/soft to very stiff/medium dense, slightly moist to moist, pale brown in color, and locally calcareous. Claystone bedrock was locally interbedded with layers and lenses of sandstone and siltstone bedrock. It was generally fine to medium grained, moderately to highly plastic, very hard with very dense and resistant lenses of sandstone bedrock, slightly moist to moist, pale brown to brown to orange brown to gray in color, and locally iron stained. Swell-consolidation testing indicated a variable potential for heave, ranging from low to high, in the tested on-site materials. Measured swell values ranged from 0.4 to 4.5 percent upon wetting against a 1,000 psf surcharge load. Swell-consolidation testing indicated moderate to high potentials for consolidation in the tested on-site materials, as well. Measured consolidation values ranged from —0.7 to -4.0 percent upon wetting against a 1,000 psf surcharge load. Please refer to Table 1 and Figures 6 through 17 for additional detailed information. • ANTICIPATED FOUNDATION SYSTEMS The recommendations provided below are preliminary. They are provided in order to assist in overall project cost estimates. These should not be used for design purposes. All recommendations provided herein are subject to revisions and modifications after a site-specific study(s) is performed. As discussed above, the site was underlain by native soils and bedrock with low to high potentials for heave and consolidation. We estimate the potential depth of wetting at the site to be approximately 15 to 20 feet. We recommend that structures with low tolerance for post-construction movement, i.e. %-inch or less, should be founded on a deep foundation system such as straight-shaft piers advanced into the underlying bedrock. A drilled pier foundation system would result in the least risk of post-construction movement of the building structures normally associated with heaving soils and bedrock. GROUND anticipates that deep foundation systems such as straight-shaft piers may be designed for allowable end bearing pressures of 20,000 to 30,000 psf and a skin friction of between 2,000 to 3,000 psf for • the portion of the pier penetrating competent bedrock. We estimate that piers will Job No.08-0009 GROUND Engineering Consultants,Inc. Page 9 Proposed Development Weld County Road 38 and Interstate 25 Weld County, Colorado • require a minimum length of 25 to 35 feet and penetrations into competent bedrock of 10 to 15 feet. However, site-specific conditions will need to be identified in order to provide final recommendations. Structures with higher tolerance for movements, i.e. 1 to 1.5 inches or more, could be supported on shallow foundation systems, such as spread footings. Based on the preliminary subsurface conditions encountered it appears that shallow foundation systems will have to be placed on a layer of moisture-density treated fill soils. GROUND anticipates that a processed fill depths to be approximately 5 to 15 feet below the foundation elements. Greater fill depths may also be necessary depending on final site grades. On-site materials appear suitable to be used as properly moisture conditioned and compacted fill material under the structure footprints (it may be necessary to excavate and replace materials more than one time to achieve necessary reductions in as-built heave potentials, particularly where the native heave potentials are greater than about 6 percent). GROUND anticipates that shallow foundation systems may be designed for an allowable soil bearing pressure of 1,500 to 2,500 psf, based on final site grades and structure types/movement tolerances. Spread footings should have a • minimum footing dimension of 16 or more inches. Final geotechnical exploration must be performed in order to confirm building-specific foundations recommendations, including fill prism depths, prior to final design. ANTICIPATED FLOOR SYSTEMS Slab-on-grade construction has been used in the Front Range area with varying degrees of success. Slab movements are directly related to the increases in moisture contents to the underlying soils and bedrock after construction is completed. As mentioned previously, if the Client is willing to assume the risk of post-construction movements as a result of heave or collapse, slab-on-grade construction could be used. Slab movements may occur, although the actual amounts of movement are difficult to quantify. The on-site materials, exclusive of topsoil, vegetation, and any deleterious materials, may be suitable to support lightly to moderately loaded slab-on-grade construction, provided they are placed on or a properly moisture-density treated layer processed to a depth determined following a final geotechnical exploration. Overexcavation and replacement with import structural fill materials may also be deemed necessary in areas • where expansive materials are in close proximity to floor systems, but commonly, Job No.08-0009 GROUND Engineering Consultants,Inc. Page 10 Proposed Development Weld County Road 38 and Interstate 25 Weld County, Colorado • properly processed site soils along with adequate surface drainage can result in reasonable potential movements. Slab-on-grade floor systems should be placed on a layer of moisture-density treated fill soils. GROUND anticipates that a processed fill depth of approximately 10 to 15 feet below the slab may be necessary to reduce movement to approximately 1 to 1.5 inches and to make movements more uniform. Greater fill depths may also be necessary. Overexcavation and replacement with on-site materials or import materials will be required in the event site grading does not allow for the above-indicated fill depths. Although not anticipated, it may be necessary to excavate and replace materials more than one time to achieve necessary reductions in as-built heave potentials, particularly where the native heave potentials were greater than about 6 percent. GROUND recommends the use of structural floor systems for structures with a low tolerance for post-construction movement as the floor systems resulting in the least potential for post-construction movement. Such systems are supported on a deep foundation. As mentioned previously, site-specific conditions will need to be identified in order to provide final recommendations.• WATER-SOLUBLE SULFATES The concentrations of water-soluble sulfates measured in selected samples obtained from the test holes ranged from less than 0.01 percent to 0.03 percent (Table 1). Such concentrations of water-soluble sulfates represent a negligible degree of sulfate attack on concrete exposed to these materials. Degrees of attack are based on the scale of 'negligible,' 'moderate,' 'severe' and 'very severe' as described in the "Design and Control of Concrete Mixtures," published by the Portland Cement Association. Based on these data GROUND, makes no recommendation for use of a special, sulfate- resistant cement in project concrete. SOIL CORROSIVITY The degree of risk for corrosion of metals in soils commonly is considered to be in two categories: corrosion in undisturbed soils and corrosion in disturbed soils. The potential for corrosion in undisturbed soil is generally low, regardless of soil types and conditions, because it is limited by the amount of oxygen that is available to create an electrolytic • Job No.08-0009 GROUND Engineering Consultants,Inc. Page 11 Proposed Development Weld County Road 38 and Interstate 25 Weld County, Colorado • cell. In disturbed soils, the potential for corrosion typically is higher, but is strongly affected by soil conditions for a variety of reasons but primarily soil chemistry. A corrosivity analysis was performed to provide a general assessment of the potential for corrosion of ferrous metals installed in contact with earth materials at the site, based on the conditions existing at the time of GROUND's evaluation. Soil chemistry and physical property data including pH, oxidation-reduction (redox) potential, sulfides, and moisture content were obtained. Test results are summarized on Table 2. Soil Resistivity In order to assess the "worst case" for mitigation planning, samples of materials retrieved from the test holes were tested for resistivity in the in the laboratory, after being saturated with water, rather than in the field. Resistivity also varies inversely with temperature. Therefore, the laboratory measurements were made at a controlled temperature.— Measurements of electrical resistivity indicated values from approximately 1,600 ohm- centimeters in a sample of soil, to approximately 8,600 ohm-centimeters in a bedrock sample. The following table presents the relationship between resistivity and a • qualitative corrosivity ratings: Corrosivity Ratings Based on Soil Resistivity Soil Resistivity (ohm-cm) Corrosivity Rating >20,000 Essentially non- corrosive 10,000 -20,000 Mildly corrosive 5,000 - 10,000 Moderately corrosive 3,000 - 5,000 Corrosive 1,000 - 3,000 Highly corrosive <1,000 Extremely corrosive pH Where pH is less than 4.0, soil serves as an electrolyte; the pH range of about 6.5 to 7.5 indicates soil conditions that are optimum for sulfate reduction. In the pH range above 8.5, soils are generally high in dissolved salts, yielding a low soil resistivity. Testing indicated pH values of approximately 7.4 through 7.510. • 9 ASM International, 2003, Corrosion:Fundamentals, Testing and Protection, ASM Handbook, Volume 13A. 10,3 American Water Works Association ANSI/AWWA C105/A21.5-05 Standard Job No.08-0009 GROUND Engineering Consultants,Inc. Page 12 Proposed Development Weld County Road 38 and Interstate 25 Weld County,Colorado • The American Water Works Association (AWWA) has developed a point system scale used to predict corrosivity. The scale is intended for protection of ductile iron pipe but is valuable for project steel selection. When the scale equals 10 points or higher, protective measures for ductile iron pipe are recommended. The AWWA scale is presented below. The soil characteristics refer to the conditions at and above pipe installation depth. Table A.1 Soil-test Evaluation 11 Soil Characteristic /Value Points Resistivity <1,500 ohm-cm 10 1,500 to 1,800 ohm-cm 8 1,800 to 2,100 ohm-cm 5 2,100 to 2,500 ohm-cm 2 2,500 to 3,000 ohm-cm 1 >3,000 ohm-cm 0 pH 0 to 2.0 5 • 2.0 to 4.0 3 4.0 to 6.5 0 6.5 to 7.5 0 7.5 to 8.5 0 >8.5 3 Redox Potential < 0 (negative values) 5 O to +50 mV 4 +50 to +100 mV 3% > +100 mV 0 Sulfide Content Positive 3% Trace 2 Negative 0 Moisture Poor drainage, continuously wet 2 Fair drainage, generally moist 1 Good drainage, generally dry 0 * If sulfides are present and low or negative redox-potential results (< 50 mV) are obtained, add three points for this range. • Job No.08-0009 GROUND Engineering Consultants,Inc. Page 13 Proposed Development Weld County Road 38 and Interstate 25 Weld County, Colorado • We anticipate that drainage at the site after construction will be good. Nevertheless, based on the values obtained for the soil parameters, the overburden soils/bedrock appear(s) to comprise a highly corrosive environment for metals. Corrosive conditions can be addressed by use of materials not vulnerable to corrosion, heavier gauge materials with longer design lives, polyethylene encasement, or cathodic protection systems. If additional information or recommendations are needed regarding soil corrosivity, GROUND recommends contacting the American Water Works Association or a Corrosion Engineer. It should be noted, however, that changes to the site conditions during construction, such as the import of other soils, or the intended or unintended introduction of off-site water, may alter corrosion potentials significantly. SITE GRADING At the time of this report preparation, detailed development plans and final building layouts and roadway construction details were not available for our review; however, based on observations conducted in the field and existing site topography, we anticipate that cuts and fills across the site could be up to 15 to 20 feet or more. • Site grading should be planned carefully to provide positive surface drainage away from buildings, and all pavements, utility alignments, and flatwork. Surface diversion features should be provided around paved areas to prevent surface runoff from flowing across the paved surfaces. Site materials free of deleterious materials are generally suitable for placement as compacted fill. Claystone fragments larger than 2 inches and sandstone fragments larger than 6 inches in maximum dimension should not be incorporated into project fills. Care should be taken, however, with regard to achieving and maintaining proper moisture contents during placement and compaction. We anticipate that some on-site materials may exhibit significant pumping, rutting, and deflection at moisture contents near optimum and above. Potential earthwork contractors should be made aware that significant processing and reprocessing of the on-site materials will likely be required. The placement of on-site fill materials should be monitored by a representative of the Geotechnical Engineer. Quality control testing should be conducted to assist the contractor in fill placement. • Job No.08-0009 GROUND Engineering Consultants,Inc. Page 14 Proposed Development Weld County Road 38 and Interstate 25 Weld County,Colorado • Prior to earthwork construction, existing vegetation, topsoil, and other deleterious materials should be removed and disposed of off-site. Relic underground utilities, if encountered, should be abandoned in accordance with applicable regulations, removed as necessary, and properly capped. Topsoil/vegetation should not be incorporated into fill placed on the site. Instead, topsoil/vegetation should be stockpiled during initial grading operations for placement in areas to be landscaped or for other approved uses. Prior to filling, the top 12 inches of on-site materials on which fill soils will be placed should be scarified, moisture-conditioned, and properly compacted to provide a uniform base for fill placement. Soils that classify as GP, GW, GM, GC, SP, SW, SM or SC (granular soils) in accordance with the USCS classification system should be compacted to 95 or more percent of the maximum modified Proctor dry density at moisture contents within 2 percent of optimum moisture content as determined by ASTM D1557. Soils that classify as CL, CH, ML or MH (cohesive soils) should be compacted to 95 percent of the maximum standard Proctor density at moisture contents from optimum to 4 percent above the optimum as determined by ASTM D698. • Fill materials should also be placed as indicated above. If surfaces to receive fill expose loose, wet, soft or otherwise deleterious material, additional material should be excavated or other measures taken, to establish a firm platform for filling. Excavated bedrock will require a well-coordinated effort to moisture treat, process, place, and compact properly. Some of the site materials, such as excavated clay soils will require a significant volume of water to be mixed into the excavated material to bring it to uniform moisture content of within 4 percent above the optimum moisture content prior to compaction. Adequate watering, and compaction equipment that aids in breaking down the material (e.g., a Caterpillar 825 compactor-roller) and heavy discs may be needed. Areas of deep fills (greater than 5 feet) are anticipated. Settlements will occur in filled ground, typically on the order of 1 to 2 percent of the fill depth. If fill placement is performed properly and is tightly controlled, in GROUND's experience the majority of that settlement will take place during earthwork construction. The remaining potential settlements likely will take several months or longer, to be realized. • Job No.08-0009 GROUND Engineering Consultants,Inc. Page 15 Proposed Development Weld County Road 38 and Interstate 25 Weld County, Colorado • No fill materials should be placed, worked, rolled while they are frozen, thawing, or during poor/inclement weather conditions. Care should be taken to place all fills in a controlled state. In the event that proper moisture and compaction is not achieved, the potential for structural movement, related to differential settlement, greatly increases. If it is necessary to import material to the site as fill, the imported soils should be free of topsoil, organic material, and other deleterious materials. Imported material should have less than 75 percent passing the No. 200 Sieve and should have a plasticity index of less than 20 or otherwise approved by the Geotechnical Engineer. Imported soils should be tested and approved by the Geotechnical Engineer prior to transport to the site. Permanent site slopes supported by on-site soils and bedrock up to 10 feet in height should be constructed no steeper than 3:1 (horizontal : vertical). Minor raveling or surficial sloughing should be anticipated on slopes cut at this angle until vegetation is well re-established. Surface drainage should be designed to direct water away from slope faces. • Stress Release in Over-Consolidated Soils The removal of large quantities of soils or bedrock (over 10 feet) may result in stress release of the underlying, over-consolidated materials. Stress release usually results in some degree of expansion of the soil strata. It is difficult to quantify the actual amount of expansion that may occur, however, it is possible for the expansion associated with stress release to impact the performance of the structure founded in these areas. It may be advantageous to perform deep cuts as soon as possible to allow as much of the anticipated stress release to occur prior to construction of structures as possible. Drainage Course Subdrain Where the ephemeral drainage courses (gullies) traversing the site will be filled, care should be taken by the Contractor to remove all soft, loose and otherwise unsuitable materials from the gully and backfill it with properly moisture conditioned and compacted fill. The Contractor should anticipate removing 2 to 4 feet or more of low density, unsuitable soils along the gully. Because water will tend to flow along the same routes even after construction in the subsurface, a subdrain should be installed along the axis of the gully at the base of the backfill to carry water to an outlet for gravity discharge. The gully subdrains should consist of perforated drain pipe, free-draining gravel, and • filter fabric. The perforated pipe for the interceptor drain should be rigid and at least 4 Job No.08-0009 GROUND Engineering Consultants,Inc. Page 16 Proposed Development Weld County Road 38 and Interstate 25 Weld County, Colorado • inches in diameter. Criteria for the free-draining gravel are indicated above. Each subdrain collector pipe should be surrounded on the top and sides only with at least 6 inches of free-draining gravel. The gravel surrounding the collector pipe should be wrapped with filter fabric. A typical subdrain system detail can be provided upon request. Clean-outs should be provided to facilitate maintenance of the system. The actual layout, outlets, etc., should be designed by the Civil Engineer. EXCAVATION CONSIDERATIONS Test holes for subsurface exploration were advanced to the depths indicated on the test hole logs by means of truck-mounted, flight auger equipment. Resistant claystone and sandstone bedrock was encountered as shallow as 6 feet below existing grade in the test holes during our investigation. Depending on final grading plans, the use of very heavy-duty excavation equipment, e.g., a Caterpillar D9 or other larger dozers, with a single-shank ripper may be beneficial locally where such materials are encountered. Specialized breaking equipment, or limited, local blasting may be cost effective to facilitate project excavations, particularly in trenches, and to break local masses of • resistant rock, if encountered. Groundwater was not encountered in the test holes during drilling operations within the depths explored below existing grades. As mentioned previously, groundwater levels will fluctuate in response to annual and longer-term cycles of precipitation, irrigation, surface drainage, land use, proximity to the existing creek/wetlands area, and the development of transient, perched water conditions. If groundwater is encountered during excavation, a properly designed and installed de-watering system may be required during construction should shallow groundwater be encountered. The risk of slope instability will be significantly increased in areas of seepage along the excavation slopes. If seepage is encountered, the slopes should be re-evaluated by the Geotechnical Engineer. Good surface drainage should be provided around temporary excavation slopes to direct surface runoff away from the slope faces. A properly designed drainage swale should be provided at the top of the excavations. In no case should water be allowed to pond at the site. Slopes should also be protected against erosion. Erosion along the slopes will result in sloughing and could lead to a slope failure. Any excavations in which personnel • will be working must comply with all OSHA Standards and Regulations. The contractor's Job No.08-0009 GROUND Engineering Consultants,Inc. Page 17 Proposed Development Weld County Road 38 and Interstate 25 Weld County, Colorado • "responsible person" should evaluate the soil exposed in the excavations as part of the contractor's safety procedures. GROUND is providing this information solely as a service to the Client and is not assuming responsibility for construction site safety or the contractor's activities. We recommend that temporary, un-shored excavation slopes up to 10 feet in height be cut no steeper than 2:1 (horizontal : vertical) in the native on-site soils, in the absence of seepage. Some surficial sloughing may occur on slope faces cut at this angle. Local conditions encountered during construction, such as loose, soft, or wet materials, or seepage will require flatter slopes. Stockpiling of materials should not be permitted closer to the tops of temporary slopes than 5 feet or a distance equal to the depth of the excavation, which ever is greater. UTILITY RECOMMENDATIONS Recommendations regarding utility trench excavation are provided in the Excavation Considerations section of this report. On-site soils and bedrock excavated from • trenches are suitable, in general, for use as trench backfill. Backfill soils should be free of topsoil/vegetation, asphalt pavement, debris, and other deleterious materials. As stated previously, the test holes for the subsurface exploration were excavated to the depths indicated by means of truck-mounted, flight auger drilling equipment. Depending on final site grading plans, the use of heavy-duty excavation equipment, e.g., a Caterpillar D9 or other larger dozer, with a single-shank ripper may be necessary to achieve project lines and grades. Specialized breaking equipment, or limited, local blasting may be cost effective to facilitate project excavations, particularly in trenches, and to break local masses of resistant rock. The placement of on-site fill materials should be monitored by a representative of the Geotechnical Engineer. Trench backfill materials should be conditioned to a uniform moisture content, placed in uniform lifts not exceeding 8 inches in loose thickness, and properly compacted as indicated in the Site Grading section of this report. The Contractor should take adequate measures to achieve adequate compaction in the utility trench backfills, particularly in the lower portions of the excavations. Some settlement of trench backfill materials should be anticipated, even where materials are • placed and compacted correctly. The Contractor should take particular care to achieve Job Na 08-0009 GROUND Engineering Consultants,Inc. Page 18 Proposed Development Weld County Road 38 and Interstate 25 Weld County, Colorado • and maintain adequate compaction of the backfill materials around manholes, valve risers and other vertical pipeline elements where greater settlements commonly are observed. Use of "flowable fill," i.e., a lean, sand-cement slurry, should be considered in lieu of compacted soil backfill for areas with low tolerances for surface settlements. Placement of flowable fills in the lower portions of the excavations and around risers, etc., likely will yield a superior backfill, although at an increased cost. Pipe bedding materials, placement, and compaction should meet the specifications of the pipe manufacturer and applicable municipality standards. The Contractor should not anticipate that significant quantities of excavated shallow soils will be suitable for use where relatively free-draining bedding materials are called for. Materials proposed for use as pipe bedding should be tested for suitability prior to use. We assume that surface drainage will direct water away from utility trench alignments. Where topography, site constraints or other factors limit or preclude adequate surface drainage, the granular bedding materials should be surrounded by non-woven filter fabric (e.g., Mirafi® 140N or the equivalent) to reduce migration of fines into the bedding • which can result in severe, local settlements. Development of site grading plans should consider the subsurface transfer of water in utility trenches and the pipe bedding. Sandy pipe bedding materials can function as efficient conduits for re-distribution of natural and applied waters in the subsurface. Cut- off walls in utility trenches or other water-stopping measures should be implemented to reduce the rates and volumes of water transmitted along utility alignments and toward buildings, pavements and other structures where excessive wetting of the underlying soils will be damaging. Incorporation of water cut-offs and/or outlet mechanisms for saturated bedding materials into development plans could be beneficial to the project. These measures also will reduce the risk of loss of fine-grained backfill soils into the bedding material with resultant surface settlement. SURFACE DRAINAGE RECOMMENDATIONS The following drainage precautions should be taken into consideration during design of the proposed development. 1) Wetting or drying of the foundation excavations and underslab areas should be • avoided during and after construction as well as throughout the life of the Job No.08-0009 GROUND Engineering Consultants,Inc. Page 19 Proposed Development Weld County Road 38 and Interstate 25 Weld County, Colorado • facilities. Permitting increases/variations in moisture to the supporting soils may result in a decrease in bearing capacity and an increase in settlement, heave, and/or differential movement. 2) Positive surface drainage measures should be provided and maintained to reduce water infiltration into foundation soils. The ground surface surrounding proposed building exteriors should be sloped to drain away from each foundation in all directions. We recommend a minimum slope of 12 inches in the first 10 feet in the areas not covered with pavement or concrete slabs, or a minimum 3 percent in the first 10 feet in the areas covered with pavement or concrete slabs. In no case should water be allowed to pond near or adjacent to foundation elements. Drainage measures also should be included in project design to direct water away from sidewalks and other hardscaping as well as utility trench alignments which are likely to be adversely affected by moisture-volume changes in the underlying soils or flow of infiltrating water. In GROUND's experience, it is • common that in areas of partially completed paving or hardscaping, bare soil behind curbs and gutters, and utility trenches water is allowed to pond after rain and snow melt events. Wetting of the subgrade can result in loss of support and increased settlements / increased heave. By the time final grading has been accomplished and surface and subsurface drainage measures completed, significant volumes of water can already have entered the subgrade. The Contractor should be directed to maintain the site drainage during construction so that water is directed into appropriate drainage structures during construction. 3) Roof downspouts and drains should discharge well beyond the perimeters of the structure foundations, or be provided with positive conveyance off-site for collected waters. 4) Landscaping which requires watering should be located 10 or more feet from building perimeters. Irrigation sprinkler heads should be deployed so that applied water is not introduced into foundation soils. Landscape irrigation should be limited to the minimum quantities necessary to sustain healthy plant growth. • Job No.08-0009 GROUND Engineering Consultants,Inc. Page 20 Proposed Development Weld County Road 38 and Interstate 25 Weld County, Colorado • Use of drip irrigation systems can be beneficial for reducing over-spray beyond planters. Drip irrigation can also be beneficial for reducing the amounts of water introduced to building foundation soils, but only if the total volumes of applied water are controlled with regard to limiting that introduction. Controlling rates of moisture increase beneath the foundations and floors should take higher priority than minimizing landscape plant losses. Where plantings are deemed absolutely necessary within 10 feet of a building, GROUND recommends that the plants be placed in water-tight planters, constructed either in-ground or above-grade, to reduce moisture infiltration in the surrounding subgrade soils. Planters should be provided with positive drainage and landscape underdrains. 5) Plastic membranes should not be used to cover the ground surface adjacent to foundation walls. Perforated "weed barrier" membranes that allow ready evaporation from the underlying soils may be used. • 6) Detention ponds commonly are incorporated into drainage design. When a detention ponds fills, the rate of release of the water is controlled and water is retained in the pond for a period of time. Where in-ground storm sewers direct surface water to the pond, the granular pipe bedding also can direct shallow groundwater or infiltrating surface water toward the pond. Thus, detention ponds can become locations of enhanced and concentrated infiltration into the subsurface, leading to wetting of foundation soils in the vicinity with consequent heave or settlement. Therefore, unless the pond is clearly down-gradient from proposed buildings and other structures that would be adversely affected by wetting of the subgrade soils, including off-site improvements, GROUND recommends that detention ponds should be provided with an effective, low permeability liner. In addition, cut-off walls and/or drainage provisions should be provided for the bedding materials surrounding storm sewer lines flowing to the pond. UNDERDRAIN/SUBSURFACE MOISTURE INFILTRATION Standard practice for the combination of soil and foundation system proposed for • projects often includes the installation of a perimeter underdrain. If properly constructed, Job No.08-0009 GROUND Engineering Consultants,Inc. Page 21 Proposed Development Weld County Road 38 and Interstate 25 Weld County, Colorado • a perimeter underdrain system can result in a reduction of moisture infiltration of the subsurface soils. However, an underdrain not properly functioning can induce settlement or heave of the subsurface soils and may result in structure/floor slab distress. It is the responsibility of the design team (the architect(s), civil engineer(s), structural engineer(s), landscape architect(s), and ownership) as well as the construction and maintenance contractor(s) to evaluate the possible sources of water in the project area over the life of the structure/facility and provide a design/construction agenda (inclusive of the possible use of a perimeter underdrain system) that ensures that moisture is directed away from the foundation/structure supporting materials prior to being allowed to infiltrate the subsurface soils, before, during, or after construction. Wetting or drying of the foundation excavations and underslab areas should be avoided during and after construction as well as throughout the life of the facility. Permitting increases/variations in moisture to the supporting soils may result in a decrease in bearing capacity and an increase in settlement, heave, and/or differential movement. The actual design/layout, outlets, and location should be designed by the civil consultant. • PRELIMINARY PAVEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS A pavement section is a layered system designed to distribute concentrated traffic loads to the subgrade. Performance of the pavement structure is directly related to the physical properties of the subgrade soils and traffic loadings. The standard care of practice in pavement design describes the recommended flexible pavement section as a "20-year" design pavement: however, most flexible pavements will not remain in satisfactory condition without routine maintenance and reconstruction procedures performed throughout the life of the pavement. The following preliminary pavement section information for anticipated project parking, driveways, and roadway improvements was developed in general accordance with the design guidelines and procedures of the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) and the Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT). Preliminary Pavement Sections We anticipate pavement sections may consist of a full depth asphalt section of • approximately 5 to 7 inches in private paved areas such as parking and access drives. Job No.08-0009 GROUND Engineering Consultants,Inc. Page 22 Proposed Development Weld County Road 38 and Interstate 25 Weld County, Colorado • A minimum section of 6 to 7 inches of Portland cement concrete in areas of high truck traffic/concentrated turning movements such as dumpster pads and loading/unloading areas (private) may also be necessary. Pavement subgrade materials will need to be properly moisture-density treated. Final pavement thickness recommendations will have to be determined during final geotechnical exploration. Concrete pavements should consist of a plant mix composed of a mixture of aggregate, Portland cement and appropriate admixtures meeting the requirements of a job-mix formula established by a qualified engineer as well as applicable design requirements of the governing municipality. Concrete should have a minimum modulus of rupture of third point loading of 650 psi. Normally, concrete with a 28-day compressive strength of 4,250 psi should develop this modulus of rupture value. The concrete should be air- entrained with approximately 6 percent air and should have a minimum cement content of 6 sacks per cubic yard. Maximum allowable slump should be 4 inches. The concrete pavement should contain properly sawed or formed joints at correct spacings. The Project Team should review applicable ACI specifications and guidelines. • Subgrade Preparation Pavements should be placed on a layer of properly prepared subgrade materials. Final thickness recommendations should be determined based on site-specific conditions determined at the time of the final geotechnical exploration. ADDITIONAL EXPLORATION REQUIREMENTS The above data and recommendations are based on a limited preliminary subsurface exploration only. Additional geotechnical studies must be performed to further evaluate the site for site-specific foundation and floor system recommendations, final site grading, groundwater level considerations, and pavement recommendations. This preliminary report should not be used for final design purposes. CLOSURE Geotechnical Review The poor performance of foundations and subsurface structures has been directly • attributed to inadequate geotechnical review and earthwork quality control. Therefore, a Job No.08-0009 GROUND Engineering Consultants,Inc. Page 23 Proposed Development Weld County Road 38 and Interstate 25 Weld County, Colorado • Geotechnical Engineer should be retained to review project plans and specifications to evaluate whether they comply with the intent of the recommendations in this report. The author of this report and/or the reviewing engineer should be contacted directly to provide this review. The review should be reported in writing. In addition, building-specific geotechnical exploration(s) must be completed for the project prior to final design and construction. The preliminary geotechnical recommendations presented in this report are highly contingent upon the completion of final geotechnical studies as well as construction observation and materials testing of project earthworks. If another geotechnical consultant is selected to provide these services, then that consultant must assume all responsibility for the geotechnical aspects of the project by concurring in writing with the recommendations in this report, or by providing alternative recommendations. Limitations This report has been prepared for Avex Group, as it pertains to the preliminary design of • the proposed development as described herein. Any prospective buyer or future ownership must be made aware of and must agree to the terms, conditions, and liability limitations outlined in the proposal. It may not contain sufficient information for other parties or other purposes. In addition, GROUND has assumed that the final geotechnical subsurface exploration will be performed prior to construction. Changes in project plan development or schedule should be brought to the attention of the Geotechnical Engineer, in order that the preliminary geotechnical recommendations may be re-evaluated and, as necessary, modified. The preliminary geotechnical conclusions and recommendations in this report relied upon subsurface exploration at a limited number of exploration points, as shown in Figure 1. Subsurface conditions were interpolated between and extrapolated beyond these locations. It is not possible to guarantee the subsurface conditions are as indicated in this report. Actual conditions exposed during construction should be anticipated to differ, somewhat, from those encountered during site exploration. The recommendations presented herein are being provided without the aid of a detailed final site grading plan as well as a detailed final development plan, which were not • available at the time of this report preparation. When final structure location(s) and Job No.08-0009 GROUND Engineering Consultants,Inc. Page 24 Proposed Development Weld County Road 38 and Interstate 25 Weld County, Colorado • dimensions are known, lot/parcel-specific final geotechnical subsurface exploration programs must be performed in order to confirm the preliminary recommendations provided as well as to provide additional, detailed, building-specific design information. Additionally, detailed subsurface explorations will be necessary in order to provide pavement design recommendations for the private paved areas upon completion of near final site grading. This report should not be used for detailed design purposes. The materials present on-site are stable at their natural moisture content, but may shrink, swell, or lose bearing capacity with changes in moisture content. It is the responsibility of the design team (the architect(s), civil engineer(s), landscape architect(s), structural engineer(s), and ownership) as well as the construction and maintenance contractor(s) to ensure that moisture is not allowed to infiltrate the underlying soils. Performance of the proposed structures and pavement will depend on implementation of the recommendations in this report and on proper maintenance after construction is completed. Because water is the principal cause of volume change in expansive soils • and rock, the design, construction, and maintenance of the improvements must eliminate changes in moisture content of the site soils/bedrock. Structural movements will most likely occur following project completion and should therefore be expected by the Owner. • Job Na 08-0009 GROUND Engineering Consultants,Inc. Page 25 Proposed Development Weld County Road 38 and Interstate 25 • Weld County,Colorado This report was prepared in accordance with generally accepted soil and foundation engineering practice in the Weld County, Colorado area, at the date of preparation. GROUND makes no other warranties, either expressed or implied, as to the professional data, opinions or recommendations contained herein. Because of numerous considerations, which are beyond GROUND's control, the economic or technical performance of the project cannot be guaranteed in any respect. We appreciate the opportunity to complete this portion of the proposed project. Please contact us with any questions or if you require additional information. Sincerely, GROUND • g Consultants, Inc. � i��,? /? Y'. (.' L,' /�' J/ ' • /'/ . qhls<s;.... / Serkan Sengul, P.E. 1 li (----*VVVIAnAlf) "4/LY-/) Reviewed by James B. Kowalsky, P.E. • Job No.G8-0009 GROUND Engineering Consultants,Inc. Page 26 I u p r i ."• f 12 13 14 15 • • • • A 8 9 10 11 • • • • in N W N rn CA q w 5 6 7 Z • • • OP I 1 2 3 4 ' i • • • • SPA; 9 ".1 i / 9 GOOGLE EARTH AERIAL IMAGE (DATE UNKNOWN) GROUND • ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS 1 LOCATION OF TEST HOLES • Indicates test hole number JOB NO. 08-0009 DRAWN BY: HS and approximate location. FIGURE: I APPROVED BY: JK (Not to Scale) CADFILE NAME: 0009SITE.DWG Test Hole Test Hole Test Hole Test Hole Test Hole 1 2 3 4 5 0 a r r i. : r.cr.' 1- ,.e i Y.tr: v r t- xr7 . -.r.,"Y. . 11/12 %Y."' ./'.A'r• ?.. :�- :f-:. :144.i.' iL'::. • ' 16/12 7.7-„r •ry'/• y r7. !.✓.7. .L•r.t.:. :TX"- .;....:'';...1.:..: 9/12 . -'r.'.•:%! 12112I' :: :�� ✓'ry' -r.r./ t i'r. r..e 7 Z%.'L' .�.rz �z.T.7• .%'rz' f/i. 1. /..r L .?..&,:•. rifY:' Y:r'�:: err: 12.i 15%12 ir-z •r1:7: .rxr. TX!' ''.-ir '.67r' d./-7 ./7././1. '.!%'�• /"r'w� r%•7" .7..i, 7112 (_ r.r.•r' .7rz .xr.i' .7.4-r. 9/12 1./f: 'l.'l:: 11112 ;✓: ✓>'/ 17/12 1. .��•j.. t•rr.. r..r.r• :r•r-r: 71.7.1- .,r.•r.••r... rl.i' 7:zi r.1./' .7'r.r..' 'AV:t.' .%.%.J -7'%1. '14.1.- 1-- ►:i:. :Y 38/12 . ;*;,.E' .r IF- .I•r.J' t-'/./ .7.fl. .1;, : 191 f '! :11'L:: .1i/.• tx..• .'i•r.r. 1/: 29/12— . '.1: 'Cfi.Y. XY.%• ..•,X.%' .Y.%.7' 1.%.I• 50/7 ✓•ia ..f.;!.).:. .7-r.'X• 1..'11.' .7'71.• .I'T.rt• T'r.1'. 50/3 .-,...;.v.•20 50/4 yf 15112 r.z.r /11 .%i'1• N - -C a • O 30 50/4 40 • - sc;1 i I I- 50 - GROUND ENGINEERING CONSUL-TRAITS • LOGS OF TEST HOLES JOB NO 08-0009 DRAWN BY: HS FIGURE: 2 APPROVED BY: JK CADFILE NAME: 0009LOG01.DV G Test Hole Test Hole Test Hole Test Hole Test Hole 11 12 13 14 15 0 0 x./.z'• 16/12 1 rX' rf.✓ 1 r '0'12 "..e%r :rl. 12/12 rcrlt.% %:cz.% rr''11.:(Z.I'' 'cra rrr rrt.: ruJ.r Jf.l.'J. 1J:f% !/%' /!%T .4/1" 1sr1 ♦/.% //%i rr;i� ir, //i I 50:7 Y.l.l'/ ./r r. 1 50;4 /T•,. % F /f/ cc:: rYi /i1 nn 26(12 r.cr .rx./ :f✓- 1".l.. 6/12 J//"" 10'12 V 5u;z rr r 1 r r/ i--- -1 Y/X Jr%'1" ✓. ,kr• ✓ice.. c/"r. /.r.r ./o.r 6/12— c% rxr" 5014 ;//:1-" — 20 - ...;.•.e t. 50/7 50/3 !%n G'fY: 0 4- a — 5014 i — 30 50/2 40 - 50/1 50/1 50 GROUND III ENGINEEFIING CONSULTANTS LOGS OF TEST HOLES JOB NO. 08-0009 DRAWN BY: I iS FIGURE: 4 'APPROVED BY: JK CADFILE NAME: 0009LOG03.DWG LEGEND: 0 \ Topsoil Sand and Clay: Typically classified as lean slightly sandy to sandy clays with localized layers and lenses of F.71. clayey and/or silty sands.They were generally fine to medium grained, tow to highly plastic, loose/soft to very stiff/medium dense,slightly moist to moist, pale brown in color.and locally calcareous. I Claystone Bedrock:Locally interbedded with layers and lenses of sandstone and siltstone bedrock It was generally fine to medium grained,moderately to highly plastic. very hard with very dense and resistant lenses of sandstone bedrock slightly moist to moist. pale brown to brown to orange brown to gray in color,and locally iron stained. IJ Drive sample, 2-inch I.D. California liner sample 23/12 Drive sample blow count, indicates 23 blows of a 140-pound hammer falling 30 inches were required to drive the sampler 12 inches. 0 Depth to water level and number of days after drilling that measurement was taken. • NOTES: 1) Test holes were drilled on 03/19/08 with 4-inch diameter continuous flight power augers. 2) Locations of the test holes were measured approximately by pacing from features shown on the site plan provided. 3) Elevations of the test holes were not measured and the logs of the test holes are drawn to depth. 4) The test hole locations and elevations should be considered accurate only to the degree implied by the method used. 5) The lines between materials shown on the test hole logs represent the approximate boundaries between material types and the transitions may be gradual. 6) Groundwater level reading shown on the log was made at the time and under the conditions indicated. Fluctuations in the water level may occur with time. GROUND ENGINEERING CONSULT19NT5 III The material descriptions on this legend are for general LEGEND AND NOTES classification purposes only. See the full text of this report for descriptions of the site materials and related JOB NO. 08-0009 DRAWN BY: HS recommendations. FIGURE. 5 APPROVED BY: JK CADFILE NAME: 0009LEG.DWG • 4 } I ( 1 i ! � i j i , i i ! I I i i I i ! i I i I I I i ! I HMI I 3 t l : • I -I ....4 t } t -i - ! ~ 1 I I ill • N S I ► - Consolidation I ; I I l i with Constant Pressure 2 - I I H i l l -�. I IH Upon Wetting-_ i € I i i i I iIiiiii F I I ; Ii j_ i ! . ! : I I t • I I II i I { I i + i 0 i I ' ! I I t I----- I I I I H , Z ' II 1 OR i I 1 __ I i 1 i I i JIII O I z 2 - _.--_.........L i - I II 3 I 1 i I + �+- I I ! £ I i i I f i i 1 f ! ! I I ! III • 4 I _ I I ill , i I I J' • x i F-r--1-, i t i ' 1,-- T � � IIII , I I i i II ! I 1 . 1 !F I i i ! I I . i I Ili 11 ! i I 1 v 0.1 1.0 10 100 APPLIED PRESSURE-ksf Moisture Content = 6.6 percent Dry Unit Weight = 99.4 pcf Sample of: Clayey Sand From: Test Hole 2 at 7 ft GROUND ENGINEERING CONSULTRNTS • SWELL-CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS JOB NO. 08-0009 DRAWN BY: HS FIGURE:6 APPROVED BY: JK CADFILE NAME: 0009SWL01 DWG 0 I i IIi I i • : -I 1 , I Additional Movement ' I ! i C I i 1 ' ( , i i with Constant Pressure z _ I( I i I I ' i i ' U----F-'---771, on Wetting_._ ' , I ; i i � ' IIil I � � � # ' C 1 . i 1i , I/ nr; :rtt R- 1 -------+ i\l�► .- I I I i a o I I I ---... \i ' 3 -_ I I I I I -1 1 1 I I : i l I f , I i l 1iiIi II I li I r I I ' I rTt i i 1 I I I I ' • 5 I ! II ! I , I , , 1 Ii 0-1 1.0 10 100 APPLIED PRESSURE-ksf Moisture Content = 17.8 percent Dry Unit Weight = 106.4 pcf Sample of: Claystone Bedrock From: Test Hole 2 at 17 ft OROUKII ENGINEERING CONSULTRNTS • SWELL-CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS JOB NO. 08-0009 DRAWN BY: HS FIGURE 7 APPROVED BY: JK CADFILE NAME: 0009SWL02.DWG s 4 # kI I F I I f I ' i I II IJ i , ,i 1 I I I ' ' I I i E F3 _ _ ! ... .Jth__ 4 I --- �.. _. L.JL.. I i T I i - Consolidation } ': I i ! i ' I I ' with Constant Pressure f I ! I i , 2 1 _(_-1: 11II 4—. ; I E Upon Wetting_ � 1 +— -•------1— f � iU I { 4Ii ` rLIIIII1 I I l ' l I I I i IE { • Ii 3 I1III['1 _t � � I ; , i I f ! fit! I f ' I I I II 'La I i ! I I1I EI Icn 0 iaI I 1 ( "_� I 0 Z o I i ' { i i I ! 3 -- I I I I • I • . I .Ii I ; I I , ; i I 1- —T---- _ I I ---- 1 I ____4___,I - , 1 I I I ! ! I , ! I _IijIl 1. 11 ; , 5 0.1 1.0 10 100 APPLIED PRESSURE-ksf Moisture Content = 7.4 percent Dry Unit Weight = 92.4 pcf Sample of: Sandy Clay From: Test Hole 5 at 3 ft GROUND ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS • SWELL-CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS JOB NO. 08-0009 DRAWN BY: HS FIGURE: 8 APPROVED BY: JK CADFILE NAME: 0009SWL03.DWG S 4 ' ! i , l , ; 1 1 III II I ! I ( i t I t t I I I , ; E i I J 1 [ ! I I 3 e 1 1 ' ! I Hi I E { 1 i It I + ' ' ! ! Consolidation I I !I I I i # l with Constant Pressure 2 .— '/ i . UPonwethn g I ( 1 I j I [ I I I i W I Oi z 1 I--- -----'--.-->-.-''-...N.'s...,i s II, oi i cn -1 0 t 1 I I TiU ' 1 I{Il 1 I ? I I i I 5 i I , , ! i I I , 0.1 1.0 10 100 APPLIED PRESSURE-ksf Moisture Content = 10.2 percent Dry Unit Weight = 96.9 pcf Sample of: Clayey Sand From: Test Hole 5 at 8 ft GROUND ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS • SWELL-CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS JOB NO. 08-0009 DRAWN BY: HS FIGURE: 9 APPROVED BY: JK y CADFILE NAME. 0009SWL04 DWG • 8 I ( j j l j ; ! i I f i i } ! it 1 i i I � ` � ll 1----t- I ! f I Consolidation i with Constant Pressure 4 -- .. _. 1 —+-- 4•-- _ i Upon WIettinq..__w i I I i • { I i r i ? , i f t ? i LI ' r i i { ti if : . I i lIi ; 1 l 1j e juilli-------------......11 I / , 0 2 ( 0 z U 6 —� T I i � III iTHi 10 I _ _ I l , I , i I D 1 1.0 10 100 APPLIED PRESSURE-ksf Moisture Content = 7.6 percent Dry Unit Weight = 91,4 foci Sample of: Sandy Clay From: Test Hole 6 at 5 ft GROUND ENGINEERING CONSULTRNTS 0 SWELL-CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS JOB NO. 08-0009 DRAWN BY HS FIGURE: 10 APPROVED BY: JK CADFILE NAME: 0009SW105 DWG • 4 I IIISiii 1 ; t (( III i i f [ l 3 . _...] 1 1 I I I ' -... 1 _I__- I I I i I I I ' Jy ' II !- f ___�,_.. -_L-i___L-_L,_. ' + Consolidation • i ` { i l ; with Constant Pressure .. 2 ._.i # ! I 1 . . ___ Upon Wettin I i I ! II , i i 1fI i ! I1 1i •; ' i i j 1 � 1 1 ( 1 � 1 ! I ? rt I J I H ) 1 III . I I I dill j I o i 1 o I I � l f J 0 I OZ 2 ---_ 1 ! ..._.._._ ._..i.. 1 --_ r 1 L.. ' t I . i i 41) I f l i ' I { i I . 4 I I I I I l i l t f�PT _ . D TI' ---__ml 1-r ' i 5 I i } I I F . , � E 0.1 1.0 10 100 APPLIED PRESSURE-ksf Moisture Content = 16.8 percent Dry Unit Weight = 105.7 pcf Sample of: Claystone Bedrock From: Test Hole 7 at 18 ft GROUND ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS • SWELL-CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS JOB NO. 08-0009 DRAWN BY: HS FIGURE: 11 APPROVED BY: JK CADFILE NAME: 0009SWL06.DWG • 4 i I I ! i • I I ; I E ! I i r ; � I i I ` ; + ; Additional Movement � it ( T . ,i I E 1 ! with Constant Pressure i i i i-- E ; - t) 2 -- ---1-- — � ! t I, i -- ---1 I 1 I_ --_ on_Wettln9 1 i i �— ` I Iii I ! i I I • I ! I r i k ; ______i_____I___._ri_ i .4i__ _ , _. 1. 1 .L ri . Ti (4 0 ---- 11 I._ i - i---I I I • o a + - I i I I 0) , Lo.7-_, I I ` \! I I V j \ _ 1 I 1 I i1. . I i I I I - I IIII I I ' ' I i I ' 1 i • I 1 1 , 1 1 1 . I I i I , 5 I I . 01 1.0 10 100 APPLIED PRESSURE-kst Moisture Content = 17.7 percent Dry Unit Weight = 109.2 pcf Sample of: Claystone Bedrock From: Test Hole 10 at 19 ft GROUND ENGINEERING CONSUITRNTS • SWELL-CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS JOB NO. 08-0009 DRAWN BY: HS FIGURE: 12 APPROVED BY• JK CADFILE NAME: 0009SW107.DWG 1 II 4 r l ? I r I l l l I i I• ? I I ; ' 5 t f _.... S 1 i r { 3 j • II f i i j�I� Additional Movement { ! i i ` I • l with Constant Pressure 2 __,� —4-1—i { __ __ I j 1 U on Wiettin : lill I i i ' ii ; f I I 1 I E I l•• I ! I ; i 1 S I 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 III ( i : 1 r l i HI i I IT 1 i I S J S i i 1 1i I I (II II i i I 1 r I I I I ? I I i l ! I l I I i l i 1 1 j I ill zo I i1.1 II I IQ i I I I I • I I F I I o • II 1 i I i II' Li I I 1 s _....___..._.�. ._.._..._ _ I I I __j__ I. !+.I. ...L- I I ! f 1 i l iw I ! I I I I I I � _ i I . I I I I I II • 4 I—� I — i - 1_ I li I t I rte_._ T � 1 � � �� 1 1 IT�� l I I 1 I I i l ! Hill 1 I I I I ! : 5 ! I . I , . I . ! , 1 l 1 0.1 1.0 10 100 APPLIED PRESSURE-ksf Moisture Content = 14.8 percent Dry Unit Weight = 99.3 pcf Sample of: Claystone Bedrock From: Test Hole 11 at 17 ft GROUND ENOSP4EEIRING CONSULTANTS S SWELL-CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS JOB NO. 08-0009 DRAWN BY' HS FIGURE: 13 APPROVED BY: JK CADFILE NAME: 0009SWL08 DWG • a i I I ' 1 I I ‘ ii f I t I III I • ! }< I I 1 u + ' { ---, I i t ,__-_L.__.i_._i__1'_;-� I , i ! ! I i ' { ; s Consolidation , i ; I I ' '; i ! I with Constant Pressure 2 -._---._�-_ ' -- I - ' i I I Upon Wettin if - ---r---- .—T— lip ' It CI li Jill ' I I il I , . i I } 1 1iil [ f 1 - -( I � J r I I o - 1HL ' zi L11 t lC I I I I I � ' u) i I • , I i H ! I I- 0 I _ _i_ z 2 I I - U i 3 -�_--._- ---1--- �-�- 1-1 0 ! I � I I II I i-- t I � _ � 1 I I : L --, I I ► 1 I �� . I I1 1 I I 5 � 1 . I 0.1 1.0 10 100 APPLIED PRESSURE-ksf Moisture Content = 10.7 percent Dry Unit Weight = 86.1 pcf Sample of: Sandy Clay From: Test Hole 12 at 4 ft GROUND ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS III SWELL-CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS JOB NO. 08-0009 DRAWN BY HS FIGURE: 14 APPROVED BY: JK CADFILE NAME 0009SWL09.DWG • 4 l i t t I ; i ; i 1 j I I f ( 1 t 1 1i t + jI , !tt 1 } ( 1 I ' i i I t { i I I I I I I i ( i I i { t I , Consolidation I :'• I ! i ! with Constant Pressure 2 ! 'i i 1 1 , i ' Upon Wetting.._ it I l i I I i i I t i 1 I J 1: i1JHtLc1i i i •' f' I a � i I I1 _ � I I i Io 3 t -,-- f i 1 I ' l i i II 1 a l_ ---_ I I I --- i "-' T— TrIT ! i 1 I . ! 1 i 0.1 1.0 10 100 APPLIED PRESSURE-ksf Moisture Content = 7.6 percent Dry Unit Weight = 107.1 pcf Sample of: Sandy Clay From: Test Hole 13 at 5 ft GROUND ill ENGINEERING CONSULTRNTS SWELL-CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS JO8 NO. 08-0009 DRAWN BY HS FIGURE: 15 APPROVED BY: JK CADFILE NAME: 0009SWL10.DWG 4 i Z 3 I j i t . i ' I I I ; i 1 , i i l s ? I ; : l i { ! i i i t I j i ! i 1 Li I 11 .1 3 - -� f ' j Consolidation I ! J with Constant Pressure 2 _ �._.. ' I i U on Wettin kll i Hi ii � l 1 - -- I I —4 iI - t ... i1 I �J I 1 ! o I. z `n 2 I --I Oo I ` fi 1r- I l l ilk- 0 4I i II ! i i I , I 1 III 5 - 1 0.1 1 0 10 100 APPLIED PRESSURE-ksf Moisture Content = 14.1 percent Dry Unit Weight 103.4 pcf Sample of: Slightly Sandy Clay From: Test Hole 14 at 2 ft GROUND ENGINEERING CONSUL.TRNTS • SWELL-CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS JOB NO. 08-0009 DRAWN BY HS FIGURE: 16 APPROVED BY: JK CADFILE NAME' 0009SWL11.DWG 4 I # I 7 1 I ( I I l I I i f t [ ! ( i• • i I I ! S 1 i , I ' E I ! 1 11t I3 - , r ( I ` 1..__`—'1--- -H-- i i { j Consolidation I I . ; ( { I 1 i I with Constant Pressure 2 ___ 4 I i � U on Wettm • t _— i t_. i 1I I I -� I I I 3 I -I I / - 1 ! TTt /�iii E f 1 z I ! t O 1 -. -_-t- 1. r:". 3 I- • I ! 5 1 i I ! j 1 1 1 I . . 0.1 1.0 10 100 APPLIED PRESSURE-ksf Moisture Content = 14.5 percent Dry Unit Weight = 112.5 pcf Sample of: Claystone Bedrock From: Test Hole 15 at 20 ft GROUND ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS ill SWELL-CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS JOB NO 08-0009 DRAWN BY HS FIGURE: 17 APPROVED BY: JK CADFILE NAME: 0009SWL 12.DWG COMPACTION TEST REPORT • Curve No.: 3504 Project No.: 08-00ut) Date: Project: \VCR 38 and 1- 5 Location: Composite Sample.From Several,-est Holes Elev./Depth: 0.5 to 4 feet Sample No. 3504 Remarks: MATERIAL DESCRIPTION Description: Classifications - USCS: c., AASHTO: •'-6t13) Nat. Moist. = Sp.G. _ Liquid Limit= 4 Plasticity Index = 16 V.> No.4= ''o % < No.200= S7.-' TEST RESULTS Maximum dry density.W 105.6 pci• Optimum moisture 18.9% 140 _. Test specification: ASTM D698 Method A Standard Compaction S130 ...- i...._... _......_ 120 - 100% SATURATION CURVES --._. ._... ......... .. ..... ._ FOR SPEC GRAY EQUAL TO. 28 '.._..._._._....._... ...�.._-.._.._.._.._. '._ _ - 2 7 26 ', 110 . _a a 100 90 80 41 70 III 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 Water content. Figure i S GROUND ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS, INC. HI B U 4N YA Y N y y Y T co v m o a _� m _m T� m o(nN ) NTTvIDTNmU N' NTNU- co CO N O II:. J. 'D N 'C C a o i p OC N 'C C Od > wc +nOm m - Ol- 0my mmmm2 N m T L 'o N N t N N y,I �, N N L NI y 0-cocoa � I I izoI n ° I3 C)I -° I , �I NI I • w 0 U 7 2 J CO J J CO J U J J J J J J J J J J J ,— øg m 0 _, 6 00000000 co d` O O O O O O 0 J D V u (J co CO D Co W re U '-. iiiiIII ; II ; flI : ; AF Z W 0 J C \ O r. �.. VI- W W r W - O) -.. , co r_ N m -t V R • C eg ` r L m � a ® ' m1 '"zOaa : I ~ CO W o N W Imo- (O u) V (n C) CO N 0) C �O N M W a J J ` co N N M M N N N N N N CO M of V (0 N CO M W L 0 d C N 3 co co W M co O co co N M 0) by N- (O IN CO d' 2 } : uw ! A- CO M W CI v in er N- C) W of N W CO CO CO in m r Ce Cl.c4 a c i 17 z.. r co tt K O N V O C N. M M N. Q N M r r r (n N RI •-• a cO CAm mi �i m g r r CO r CO c0 r r CO r _.__ N y r CO W CO b. co 7 CO W CO r V CO CO IN CO NI O r V' NO C M) V W t`- Oi r r O N O• W N W O I� V O r V' V Z 2 0 r G .9 a6-. U N (OY N N W (n:.. • M CO .- "n V V) N N o 0 J 0 d N tOD o ` ° Z NCO v "n Al W ) (a N IN N m r r r 0 0 n' f° ) )— ` $i0 / ] i /: #jz C (00 -J § ED § { f » ) k / § i7" e4 • § C § / @ § § § J \ \ \ - _ �) 0 E zE re 0 \ f G a. k i v Lo ■ 0. ■ � U) ! % k « \ § JA \ ' o 0"- r; , . let)) h. r 2 0 High Point at Mead Preliminary Utility Report Mead, Colorado Prepared for: • HD Path of Growth Partners, Ltd. & 1-25 and 389 Partners, Ltd. 5953 Dallas Parkway, Suite 200-A Plano, TX 75093 Prepared by: CH2M HILL, Inc. 9191 South Jamaica Street Englewood, CO 80112-5946 CH2MHILL Project No. 368816 CH2MHILL Submittal Date: May, 2008 Resubmitted Date: July, 2008 • • UTILITY REPORT AND PLAN ACKNOWLDGEMENT This report and plan for the preliminary utility design of High Point at Mead was prepared by me or under my direct supervision in accordance with the provisions of the Town of Mead Standards for the owners thereof. I understand that the Town of Mead does not and will not assume liability for utility facilities designed by others. Joshua S. Hoop Registered Pr ession Engineer State of Colorado NI?. 9335 Date 7 d$ For and on behalf of CH2M HILL • • High Point at Mead Preliminary Utility Report i • Table of Contents I. General Site Location and Description 1 II. Purpose 1 III. Existing Conditions 2 IV. Potable Water System 2 Existing Facilities 2 Proposed Facilities 3 Design Criteria 3 Analysis Methods & Results 4 Conclusion 5 V. Sanitary Sewer System 5 Existing Facilities 5 Proposed Facilities 5 Design Criteria 6 • Analysis Method & Results 7 Conclusion 8 VI. References 9 Appendices Appendix A-Potable Water System Design and Map Appendix B -Sanitary Sewer Design and Map • High Point at Mead Preliminary Utility Report ii • I. General Site Location and Description High Point at Mead (Site) is located in unincorporated Weld County, at the northeast corner of Interstate-25 (1-25) and County Road 38 (CR 38). The Site is bound by future CR 11 to the east and future CR 40 to the north. The Site is located in a portion of Section 35,Township 4 North and Range 68 West of the 6th Principal Meridian in the County of Weld, State of Colorado. The following report has been conducted as a requirement of the petition for annexation to the Town of Mead. The 595 acre Site will consist of single family and multi-family residential,commercial, mixed use development as well as parks and open space. The High Point at Mead development is designed to establish growth in an attractive community within the Town of Mead. The proposed land use plan and engineering have been designed to reflect the Town of Mead Comprehensive Plan and other land use regulations within the Town. STATE HWY 56 COUNTY ROAD a • rc COUNTY ROAD 40 0 i � 2 in COUNTY ROAD 38 '99 COUNTY ROAD 34 n D MN 86 VICINITY MAP II. Purpose The intent of this report is to provide an understanding of the proposed utility layout and usage rates for the High Point at Mead development. The proposed demands have been calculated along with points of connection in order to understand the relationship between each utility district and the proposed development. The Site lies completely within the Town of Mead Sewer boundary and within the Little Thompson Water District (LTWD). Thus • upon the approval for annexation to the Town of Mead the Site will be serviced by each of High Point at Mead Preliminary Utility Report 1 . these respective utility districts. A final utility report will be conducted upon approval of the petition for annexation to the Town of Mead and prior to final design of the property. III. Existing Conditions The High Point at Mead Site currently consists of undeveloped agricultural land. The existing topography consists of gentle slopes typically ranging from one to five percent with multiple oil and gas appurtenances scattered throughout the property. The more dominant existing surface features consist of wells with various storage tanks which are all accessible by dirt roads traversing the Site. A small parcel of Section 35 located at the midpoint of the western property line is owned and maintained by the American Telephone and Telegraph Company (AT&T). The AT&T site has dedicated easements for communication systems that run through the High Point at Mead property. Other utilities running though the Site primarily consist of gas pipelines and communication system lines. The Farmers Extension Ditch which is owned and operated by the Farmers' Reservoir and Irrigation Company (FRICO) enters the property from the south approximately one quarter mile east of 1-25. The concrete lined ditch flows parallel along the north side of CR 38 and begins to meander north at the midpoint of Section 35. The ditch flows north for approximately one third mile before heading east off-site. • IV. Potable Water System Existing Facilities The LTWD Online Base Map has been used in conjunction with the ALTA/ACSM Land Title Survey and field utility locates for the Site to locate existing utilities, however exact size and location of all existing water mains surrounding the Site are not certain and currently under review by the LTWD. The applicant for the annexation understands that the intent of the Preliminary Utility Report is for initial review and approval by the LTWD and the Town of Mead. The LTWD shall determine the accuracy of the existing mains shown in the report as well as the available point of connection(s) and pressure(s). This understanding is based on discussions with the LTWD and the process of petitioning for annexation to the Town of Mead. The waterline design and layout established within this report is based on the criteria stated prior and will be finalized upon further discussions with the LTWD and the Town of Mead. The High Point at Mead property is surrounded by various existing water mains primarily located along the east side of the frontage road and along the north side of CR 38. Although the Site will be served by the LTWD not all water mains surrounding the property are owned and maintained by the LTWD. The LTWD and the Central Weld County Water District (CWCWD) have joint responsibility of a 42" transmission line running parallel along the east side of I-25. Based on the LTWD Online Base Map it • appears that the 42" transmission line supplies the region with water from Carter Lake. The transmission main appears to terminate at a water vault located near the southwest High Point at Mead Preliminary Utility Report 2 • corner of the Site. A 6" waterline owned and maintained by the LTWD runs east from the vault through CR 38. A 24" water line owned and maintained by the CWCWD runs parallel to the north side of CR 38. Through discussion with local officials it is understood that an 8" and a 24" stub exist within the southwest corner of the Site, both owned and maintained by LTWD. It is our recommendation that all water line locates and sizes be confirmed by the LTWD and field verified by the contractor prior to construction. Proposed Facilities The proposed waterlines have been designed in conformance with the criteria set forth in the Town of Mead Standards. The primary point of connection for High Point at Mead will be the existing 24" ductile iron waterline stub located in the southwest corner of the Site. The pressure for the 24" stub is regulated by the existing water vault also located in the southwest corner of the Site. A proposed 10" waterline will extend east from the point of connection and shall serve as the second point of connection at the intersection of CR 38 and CR 9.5. At the time of the report no future development was proposed east of the Site, therefore the system is shown modeling a 10" line extended east through CR 38. The 10" line adequately serves the proposed demands of High Point at Mead and may be increased in order to serve future development if determined necessary by the LTWD and the Town of Mead. The High Point at Mead water demands for the residential portion of the development are adequately served by an 8" waterline looped through the single family residential neighborhoods. The commercial and mixed use • parcels will primarily be served by a 12" waterline. A 10" waterline will run north/south through CR 9.5 and will tie to the 8" line serving the residential and to the 12" line serving the commercial. The proposed demands have been broken down based on land use and are included in the Proposed Water System Map located in the back map pocket of Appendix A. Design Criteria The criteria used in preparation for the proposed water distribution system is based on the current Water Line Design Criteria found in the Town of Mead Standards as well as criteria set forth in the surrounding communities. The following is a list of applicable criteria; • Maximum main design pressure: 200 psi • Minimum main design pressure: 45 psi • Residual pressure during fire flow: 40 psi • Maximum length of dead end line no greater than: 600 ft Design standards and criteria from surrounding towns were used in order to supplement the Town of Mead criteria. The following table shows the average demands and peaking factors utilized in the waterline design of Table 2, Water main Design Flows, located in Appenix A. • High Point at Mead Preliminary Utility Report 3 • Land Use Avg Demand Max Day/Avg Day Max Hr/Max Day Residential 145 GPCD* 3.05 1.9 Commercial 1651 GPD/Acre 2.00 1.9 Park 3060 GPD/Acre 3.90 1.9 *Gallons per Capita/Day Upon the approval of annexation, High Point at Mead will be serviced by the Mountain View Fire District. The Mountain View Fire District criteria is as follows; • Single family land use fire flow, 1500 gpm • Commercial &light industrial land use fire flow, 2500 gpm • Heavy industrial fire flow,3500 gpm Analysis Methods & Results Design flow rates (Avg Day, Max Day, and Peak Hour) for the Site are calculated in accordance with the proposed land uses, acreages,and dwelling units established in the land use plan. A water system model was developed using the Bentley WaterCAD V8 software in order to better understand the development of the Site. The model is designed to reflect the proposed demands calculated in Table 2 of Appendix A as well as the pipe network configuration shown in the Proposed Water System Map, also included • in Appendix A. The point of connection for the Site is believed to have substantial pressure; therefore a pressure of 110 psi is utilized to be verified during final design. For the purpose of the WaterCAD model the pressure is converted to an elevation and applied to an elevation of a reservoir located at the point of connection. This allows the software to model the desired pressure at the point of connection in order accurately model a true scenario. Three scenarios (Avg Day, Max Day,and Peak Hour) are run using the WaterCAD model to ensure that adequate pressure and flow are maintained throughout each. Once the waterline pipes are sized to handle these three scenarios a fire flow demand is added to the Maximum Day scenario. The fire flow utilized for High Point at Mead Site is 2500 gpm with a residual pressure of no less than 40 psi. The WaterCAD output sheets located in Appendix A highlight the pressure, maximum flow and velocity at each junction for each scenario. • High Point at Mead Preliminary Utility Report 4 • Proposed Demand Summary Average Maximum Peak Basin Junction Day Day Dour GPM GPM C-1 J-1 70 139 264 C-2 J-2 164 552 1049 C-3 J-3 137 439 834 C-4 J-1 194 625 1187 C-5 J-5 110 328 623 C-6 J-6 50 116 221 C-7 J-7 29 60 114 C-8 J-8 56 179 340 Conclusion The proposed waterline design and concepts within this report are based on the Water Line Design Criteria in the Town of Mead Standards. The Site's internal waterline distribution network is designed to adequately convey the demands of the proposed land use plan. The waterline was modeled using the Bentley WaterCAD V8 Software in order to completely understand the necessary pipe sizes internal to the Site. The proposed • point of connection for Site is located in the southwest corner of the Site and shall be reviewed upon by the LTWD and the Town of Mead during review of the annexation. Upon acceptance of the petition for annexation a final water system analysis will be completed taking into account all considerations from the Town of Mead and LTWD. V. Sanitary Sewer System Existing Facilities The Town of Mead wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) currently serving the Town has insufficient capacity for future development as well as inadequate treatment processes. A future WWTP is under construction and will be located east of I-25 and CR 34, approximately two miles south of High Point at Mead. The existing Town of Mead WWTP will be taken offline once the new construction is complete in October of 2008. The future WWTP will serve the existing Town of Mead and future development designated by the Town of Mead. The WWTP is designed to handle a capacity of 0.5 mgd upon completion in October of 2008 and will have the ability for expansion of an additional 0.5 mgd. The Town of Mead's existing WWTP influent is approximately 0.135 mgd. Proposed Facilities The High Point at Mead sanitary sewer design is based on the current Wastewater • Collection Criteria found in Town of Mead Standards as well as criteria set forth in the High Point at Mead Preliminary Utility Report 5 • surrounding communities. The following section,Design Criteria further discusses and outlines the specific requirements. The calculated demands generated within the Site are based on the proposed land use plan and densities referenced in the petition for annexation. The demands have been used to size the pipes and are located in Table 4, Sanitary Sewer Design Flows for Combined Basins,included in Appendix B. The Proposed Sanitary Sewer Map also located in Appendix B shows the proposed sanitary sewer sizes with the overall layout of the sewer system. The proposed sanitary sewer will ultimately discharge to the future WWTP approximately two miles south of CR 38. The natural topography of the Site creates two low points within it's boundaries. In order to adequately serve the Site and discharge to the future WWTP, two lift stations have been implemented into the design. Lift Station A is located at the intersection of CR 9.5 and CR 40. This is a natural low point in the existing topography and will serve the northern portion of the Site. From Lift Station A, flow will be pumped south through a 10" force main under CR 9.5 to the high point in the road, approximately one half mile south of the Lift Station. The pressurized flow will terminate at a proposed manhole and continue to gravity flow south towards CR 38. Lift Station B,located near the intersection of CR 38 and CR 11 will primarily serve the eastern half of the Site. The Lift Station will pump flow west through a 10" force main under CR 38 toward the intersection of CR 38 and CR 9.5. Here, pressurized sewer will enter a manhole and combine will the Site's remaining effluent. The Site's total effluent will gravity flow south through an 18" PVC sewer main offsite to future manhole (MH 14) located near the northeast corner of I-25 and CR 34. MH 14 is part of the proposed design set that will • convey flow from the Town of Mead to the future WWTP. The invert for MH 14 was obtained from the New WWTP Outfall Sewer Addendum No. 1 Drawings by JB Wright & Associates,September 2007. MH 14 ties to a 21" PVC sewer main and ultimately discharges to the WWTP. The exact alignment for the sanitary infrastructure connecting the High Point at Mead sanitary sewer to MH 14 is dependent upon future development south of the Site. The Town of Mead Comprehension Plan shows the development of CR 9.5 through the High Point at Mead Site and continuing further south. Therefore the proposed layout enables the sanitary sewer to gravity flow south through CR 9.5 towards MH 14. However, if development of CR 9.5 were delayed or unexpected the sanitary sewer could also be conveyed south to MH 14 along the existing frontage road. Further discussion with the Town of Mead will help determine the future alignment of the offsite sanitary infrastructure. Currently, there is no knowledge of future development south of the Site, therefore the 18" PVC sewer main has not been sized to receive additional flow. Design Criteria The proposed sanitary sewer system design is based on the current Wastewater Collection Criteria located in the Town of Mead Standards. The following is a list of applicable criteria; • Residential design flow: 100 gal/capita/day • Commercial design flow: 2280 gal/acre/day • • Average of 3.7 persons per dwelling unit is to be used (assumed single family) High Point at Mead Preliminary Utility Report 6 • • Minimum flow for laterals &submains flowing 1/2 full is 400 gal/capita/day • Minimum flow for mains,trunklines &interceptors flowing 1/2 full is 250 gal/capita/day Design standards and criteria from surrounding towns were used in order to supplement the Town of Mead criteria. The following is a list of local design criteria used; • Peaking Factor, PF = 3.8/(ADF)017 , ADF = Average Daily Flow • Maximum PF = 5.0, minimum PF= 2.5 • Maximum flow depth vs. pipe diameter is 80% for pipes 10" and smaller • Minimum pipe slopes: 0.4% (8"),0.28% (10"), 0.22% (12") • Average of 1.9 persons per dwelling unit is to be used for multi family units Analysis Method & Results The preliminary analysis of the sanitary sewer is based on the proposed land use plan and densities referenced in the petition for annexation. The proposed mains and laterals are sized using the peak flow rates calculated in Table 4 of Appendix B. The peaking factor calculation is based on the average daily flow (ADF) and used to determine peak flow rates for each sanitary basin. The pipe sizes,available capacities and minimum velocities are based on Manning's equation with a coefficient of 0.0013. The results are calculated in Table 4,Sanitary Sewer Design Flows for Combined Basins and included in • Appendix B. The design points shown in Table 5, Design Point Summary Table, are included in Appendix B and used to calculate the cumulative peak flow rates and adequately size each pipe segment. As previously stated, the natural topography of the Site creates a low point along the northern boundary and an ideal location for Lift Station A. The 10" force main from Lift Station A will convey flow south to the high point in CR 9.5. Lift Station B,will pump flow through a 10" force main from the southeast corner of Section 35 towards the intersection of CR 38 and CR 9.5. Both force mains are sized based on the cumulative flow rates established in Table 4 of Appendix B and using the Metcalf&Eddy Table 6, Force Main Capacity. The total High Point at Mead average daily flow for sanitary sewer upon completion is 0.767 MGD. The capacity (ADF) for each lift station is determined in Table 4,Sanitary Sewer Design Flows for Combined Basins included in Appendix B. The final utility report for High Point at Mead will discuss the full design of both lift stations and force mains. • High Point at Mead Preliminary Utility Report 7 • Sanitary Sewer Design Flows for Individual Basins Average Residential Commercial Daily Design Individual Basin Arca Land Flow (ADF) Point Basin ID Desc. (acres) Use (GPD) (GPD) (MGD) 1 Al MU 45.3 Comm 103,284 0.1033 2 A2 SF 39.1 Res 57,868 0.0579 3 A3 SF 29.9 Res 44,252 0.0443 4 A4 MF 22.5 Res 34,200 0.0342 8 B1 MU 36.6 Comm 83,448 0.0834 9 B2 ME 15.0 Res 22,800 0.0228 11 B3 - 36.2 Comm 82,536 0.0825 12 B4 - 25.1 Comm 57,228 0.0572 15 B5 SF 37.8 Res 55,944 0.0559 17 B6 SF 16.5 Res 24,420 0.0244 18 B7 SF 30.3 Res 44,844 0.0448 20 Bs SF 62.7 Res 92,796 0.0928 21 B9 SF 21.5 Res 31,820 0.0318 24 BR) SF 21.2 Res 31,376 0.0314 Total 440,320 326,496 0.7668 • Conclusion The proposed sanitary sewer design and concepts within this report are based on the Wastewater Collection Criteria found in the Town of Mead Standards. The Site's internal sanitary sewer is designed to handle and adequately convey the demands of the proposed land use plan. The sanitary sewer was sized using the calculated peak flows and Manning's Equation as shown in Table 4 of Appendix B. Due to the existing topography of the Site and the proposed point of connection, two lift stations have been utilized in order to support the Site's natural topography. The High Point at Mead effluent is approximately 0.767 MGD and will gravity flow south to future manhole (MH 14) that will ultimately discharge to the Town of Mead's future WWTP. The future WWTP is currently under construction and expected to be operational by November of 2008. • High Point at Mead Preliminary Utility Report 8 • VI. References 1. Town of Mead Design Criteria and Construction Requirements,January 1998. 2. City and County of Broomfield Standards and Specifications, 2007. 3. Force Main Capacity Table; Metcalf and Eddy, 1981. 4. New WWTP Outfall Sewer Addendum No. 1 Drawings; JB W right& Associates, Inc., September 2007. 5. Little Thompson Water District (LTWD) Base Map Drawing; www.ltwd.org 6. Town of Mead Land Use Plan; JR Engineering, September 2004. • • High Point at Mead Preliminary Utility Report 9 • • Appendix A Potable Water System • TABLE 1: PROPOSED DEMAND SUMMARY Average Maximum Basin Junction Day Day Peak Hour GPM GPM C-1 J-1 70 139 264 C-2 J-2 164 552 1049 C-3 J-s 137 439 834 C-4 J-4 194 625 1187 C-5 J-5 110 328 623 C-s J-s 50 116 221 C-7 J-7 29 60 114 Ge J-8 56 179 340 • 0 _ - 0 Oa * _* #' n d at a at a b #- 04 0g w' E 0a T' bt a c co ?+, �a ? LlQ ^ et#Zq, o.o. a. d k° Ot . is eiI , $.. o v y cto j a, a, 1aa ;at as, 0: w bG 8 8 8 ,C0 01 Oh $ ggu 88 8 $ o0 8 7 7 PQ. a obi w a `°• acii �.: m ' m 4' ,o +aw, i . Q Q C7 a s a a, ro CO m r w o", m.. a s a a.. .gym a � oaa a, ag a , at � .... 3 O 1p m [c. U..4 w Ir s o0. r� 0 .Q z Z E w $t' co c? c a' a c a F,, r ;1i 3 x c?a. t- co' „ h is ; ; so m 3 > { ^ o "' a M. X Q'; 0. alli N. A i'fil 2 tat,G M m i••4 cu 04 3 1 cG 3 �4 v 0 -� w noC m O o .ao F.: am g 6A 0 m a y 8 . 'I 88 "? 8 X88 0? N8N c8 8R8 :`� '° V�R . ,, u 7a �8 w v co E7 d V 9 O. & 'O Y G. 0.oo F., oza 9 V 0. KR.- .O 6 k K. d 'O a O � o t oo , z voo aa000 . cio o `. o go x r I z to a, .. w I a) • « a a a m .n w N - w a w a t°: a a C tri o '3 ") • 0c' ro a a ca 4-4 .a. r r ao el a• co ,.1 .. w m f0 =o O . co :'.1 ,6 C h coo b c c os c c n va 8 2, .� mp Z ^, w a a. ' a >` v 0 A ›. •;, v - c a o ac. zaaw LARGE MAPS AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING AT THE CLERK TO THE BOARD'S OFFICE, IN THE PUBLIC REVIEW FILE. • Appendix B Sanitary Sewer System • • TABLE 9 SANITARY SEWER DESIGN FLAWS for INDIVIDUAL BASINS Design Flow: User Type Unit Wastewater Flow Rate Commercial 2280 gallons/acre/day SF 4.0 DU/ac a Residential 100 gallons/capita/day MF 8.0 DU/ac People/Dwelling Unit(SF) 3.7 People/Dwelling Unit(Multi-Family) 1.9 Manning's Coefficient 0.015 Residential Commercial Average Daily Design Individual Basin Area Land Flow(ADF) Point Basin ID Desc. (acres) Use (GPD) (GPD) (MGD) 1 Al MU 45.5 Comm 103,284 0.1033 2 A2 SF 39.1 Res 57,868 0.0579 9 AS SF 29.9 Res 44,252 0.0443 4 A4 MF 22.5 Res 54,200 0.0542 8 Bl MU 56.6 Comm 83,448 0.0834 9 B2 MF 15.0 Res 22,800 0.0228 11 BS - 56.2 Comm 82,556 0.0825 12 B4 - 25.1 Comm 57,228 0.0572 • 15 B5 SF 57.8 Res 55,944 0.0559 17 B6 SF 16.5 Res 24,420 0.0244 18 B7 SF 30.5 Res 44,844 0.0448 20 B8 SF 62.7 Res 92,796 0.0928 21 B9 SF 21.5 Res 31,820 0.0318 24 B10 SF 21.2 Res 91,376 0.0314 Total 440,520 326,496 0.7668 S P:\Projects\368816 High Point at Mead\Reports\Utility\San-Demands.xls O I" •• o oe e o e o 0 0 0 'a 0 0 0 0 0 0 o e - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (z. O 'V n a a0 al op a. O at CO o ti 0 m .1 a m a' N a a w Io .+ on y o E. In a In » O w t0 ai t0 ' tp a - n In c0 -i C w g w w 0) .-i a W ty a ;3,5, + 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 040) 0) 0) In a In a' n a 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) a V O t 2 •0 $ O O o O ! m + 0 o r o 04 o n o o 2 o 0 0 'n o m n a to Oa b h In at .N Iq � W � w � d!• In t5).> H h � h >n W In .N to?, n C ^y 1- of 01 04 of o1 01 01 01 01 01 01 Ci of w o1 of of c1 of Gi o1 0) of of o1 of a a A O co co W N a• H H 10 03 N In 0 0 In 0 04 In 03 0 0 In 0 0 0 0 - In In 10 to I- n co a n n w N 0 N 0 n n n N n n n 0 n <n 04 a rj a u a ci a O - -; •; O a of a of a mi O a a a O a O •� O •'- of a: a a 0.. s e e e 0 e e e e e e e e e 0 0 e e e ?gee * e e e e a 0 a 0 a 0 a a ao a d o2. 0 0 a 0 as a o 0 a a 0 a 0 0 V y I ) CO co 03 OD O w w CO co w co a co `n, m m w op ao co 0o O op w 04 cc A b co E y A e o e e o e e o o e e e e e o o e e o e O 0 O 0 o e A Q W W 8 g g 8 c g a' g 0) g 0) 8 0) ° 0) 0) W 0) 0 8 8 8 as a A w o (:.,uric) ,o • co T CO0CD co a� at co da4� re co A In a' DI In CO a• w in w p •', 40 tD at at N 41 » In n 04 to d! 04 CD 0 t- 2., (i O O O a O -; -4 •'; O a -I a c1 O of O ad a d a a --; a -i ci 4 C U w w° W o O w a 04 n a w - 04 .. In n a op 0 w w In CO to a� p - O m In C o (� a w w .+ co a .+ + .+ W a' >n w n w w a .N .+ a a .. O m o pa., k., ci o O O o a .� ci o -. a .. o o d o O O o ci o ci -. .- m z E-' =ct w (.14 al Oil � a888888W88fi8 `48 888888888CCt a MI ,O 10 in >n in a a s a; a t a t a a a a to a s to In 4. Tti m a C + w 0. Y id co q 0) 03 a• N In o 0) M w M In n w to a. In a 0) w W .'� .'. ti ^'1 n C 0 In 0) H of d4 ao w m ao a• In o a w d. CO) a m oa ao m ao tc 4 .22 O O o w O O w o » o d� o o O o 0 0 0 o w w N v le, p. O O O O O O O O O O O O O a a a a O a O O O O O O O a E .;31� > C.) A co a A a x c o v a. m CO O- 1 n 3 ti w PIl CC N d ofPc 0 o A ❑ a4 + 0.1 of a W CC ,c m g •O • Q oi' ' + co N co GC of a7 .-7 p � a = d d < C - < of co co .2 m a ao co w0 co t6 co co co as O 0 01 � �, b .� y ; Q y .Q o Cz Z >n H A ,(Y a f/1 Id Or w' 0 tA�+ a 4Yi 42 2 al Qa Y a t d a w n N A a 03 .. a 0 a a 0 0 G 5 it C a O 3 L d C a o 4 01 CI .0 Y O Y V ^ C U Q w en a' >n to m a o .. CH m a' >n CO n CO a 004 w GI N obi COl C• CO CO C C i 8 'CD 1 w 4 ao 'c n w a.a o .= a • TABLE 5: DESIGN POINT SUMMARY TABLE Combined Average Daily Peak Flow Design Point Flow (ADF) MGD MGD 1 0.1033 0.52 2 0.0579 0.29 3 0.0443 0.22 4 0.0342 0.17 5 0.1375 0.69 6 0.1954 0.98 7 0.2396 1.16 8 0.0834 0.42 9 0.0228 0.11 10 0.2624 1.25 11 0.0825 0.41 12 0.3449 1.57 13 0.0572 0.29 14 0.4022 1.78 15 0.0559 0.28 16 0.0244 0.12 • 17 0.0448 0.22 18 0.0693 0.35 19 0.0928 0.46 20 0.0318 0.16 21 0.0878 0.44 22 0.1806 0.90 23 0.0314 0.16 24 0.2119 1.05 25 0.2812 1.33 26 0.7668 3.05 • • TABLE 6: FORCE MAIN CAPACITY Diameter Velocity= 2 fps Velocity= 4 fps Velocity= 6 fps (Inches) GPM GPM* GPM 6 176 362 528 8 313 626 626 10 490 980 1,470 18 1,585 3,170 4,755 24 2,819 5,638 8,457 36 6,342 12,684 19,026 Souce:Metcalf and Eddy,1981. "The Force Mains for High Point at Mead were designed with an assumed velocity of 4 fps • 0 LARGE MAPS AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING AT THE CLERK TO THE BOARD'S OFFICE, IN THE PUBLIC REVIEW FILE. • Water Rights The High Point at Mead Site currently consists of undeveloped dry agricultural land and was not purchased with any water rights. The Project will obtain the necessary water to serve the development via tap fees from the Little Thompson Water District based on demands explained further in the Utility Report. • • • GENERAL ECOLOGICAL RESOURCES SURVEY HIGH POINT AT MEAD Approximately 595.88 Acres in Section 35 Township 4 North, Range 68 West Weld County, Colorado ix r Ait 4,4} t *sot;�'s re It :.- • PREPARED FOR: Prepared For: CH2M Hill,Inc. Josh Hooper, Project Manager 9193 South Jamaica Street Englewood, Colorado 80112 WEBTErtN IUSTVIItONMENT AND ECOLOGIC. INC. 2217 West Powers Avenue Littleton, Colorado 80120 (303) 730 3452 (phone) (303) 730-3461 (fax) www.westemenvironment.com • • GENERAL ECOLOGICAL RESOURCES SURVEY HIGH POINT AT MEAD Approximately 595.88 Acres in Section 35 Township 4 North, Range 68 West Weld County, Colorado PREPARED FOR: Prepared For: CH2M Hill, Inc. Josh Hooper Project Manager 9193 South Jamaica Street Englewood, Colorado 80112 JUNE 26,2008 Western Environment and Ecology, Inc. Project Number: 493-001-01 Prepared by: asoi W. lbi egor Gre . herman Staff lcientist P_ resi ent- WESTERN ENVIRONMENT AND ECOLOCIFT, INC. 2217 West Powers Avenue Littleton, Colorado 80120 (303) 730 3452 (phone) • (303) 730-3461 (fax) www.westernenvironment.com • TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1 2.0 STUDY AREA 2 3.0 METHODS 5 4.0 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 7 4.1 Wetlands 7 4.2 Species Eliminated from Consideration 8 4.3 Species Included in Survey 9 Western Burrowing Owl 9 Bald Eagle 9 Mountain Plover 10 Plains Sharp-Tailed Grouse 10 Lesser Prairie Chicken 11 Ferruginous Hawk 11 Preble's Meadow Jumping Mouse 11 Black-tailed Prairie Dog 12 Ute Ladies'-Tresses Orchid 13 • Pawnee Montane Skipper 14 Other Wildlife 14 5.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 15 6.0 LITERATURE CITED 16 FIGURES FIGURE 1 Site Location Map 3 FIGURE 2 Site Map 4 TABLES TABLE 1 Threatened and Endangered Species in the Colorado Piedmont 6 APPENDICES APPENDIX A USACOE CONCURRENCE LETTER • APPENDIX B USFWS PREBLE'S MOUSE EXCLUSION LETTER • General Ecological Resource Survey High Point at Mead-j45.xR %Li in 1\Lid Coumr-.Cnit)! dn Page -1- 1.0 INTRODUCTION Western Environment and Ecology, Inc. (Western Environment) was retained by CH2M Hill Inc., to conduct a general survey of ecological resources, including threatened and endangered species, wetlands, and other significant habitats, on approximately 595.88 acres in Section 35 of Township 4 North Range 68 West, Weld County, Colorado. The project is located northeast of the intersection of Interstate Highway 25 Frontage Road and Weld County Road 38. Mr. Josh Hooper, Project Manager for CH2M Hill, indicated that this study was in response to potential annexation of the property to the Town of Mead. The objectives of this study were to (1) establish presence/absence and potential habitat of any federal or state threatened and endangered species on the property, (2) identify any wetlands or other ecologically sensitive areas on or adjacent to the property, and (3) make practical recommendations based on the results of the study if required. ;, • Ai r;a View to west of High Point at Mead Property • WESTERN ENVIRONMENT AND ECOLOGY, INC. General Ecological Resource Survey High Point at Mead-545.88 Acre in Weld(OLIN,.(ulo,cdo Page -2- 2.0 STUDY AREA The project, comprising approximately 595.88 acres, is located in Section 35, Township 4 North, Range 68 West, Weld County, Colorado (Figure 1). At the time of this investigation, the site was in non-irrigated wheat cultivation in the west and northern most fields. The southeast portion of the property, which could be irrigated, appeared to have also been planted in wheat. With the exception of two small metal grain silos, no structures occur on the property. A microwave relay station occupies approximately 20 acres along the western border of the site. Additionally, an abandoned dairy and cattle feedlot are present southeast of the project. Several petroleum production wells and associate facilities occur on the property. The Farmer's Extension Ditch bisects the project flowing from west to east. The ditch, which is concrete lined, ends approximately five miles to the east of the project. The approximate mean elevation of the property is 5,075 feet above sea level (USGS Johnstown 7.5 Minute Quadrangle, 1988). Topography is gently rolling hills with 1 to 9 % • slopes. Site soils include Nunn clay loam, Wiley-Colby complex, interspersed with Colby loam, Otero sandy loam (MRCS), overlying the Cretaceous age Pierre Shale (Tweto 1979). et b x/ s 1 . t I �� dlr ) ,. • I q k. ,3, ! '.C N • 1 • 1 F kt Irrigation ditch looking north • WESTERN ENVIRONMENT AND ECOLOGY, INC. rse.uou j �-' - t �1 % 3 'late, ,uet - J Wear C w Kehler _k,_-----7,--- ___" ✓ 4Os Hummel _ ° a p Pa w ` GaAs H � esenro r I 51 l " fl e ewe ,tile s---sJh�r, -CO akt�L / Sir I / "" 1 thoud 75', I r W 3r N W - sn. .. 'rr,%rt• ._;1 F f ��' "ran _ , G>BaVe, 4 tLfi1 -. - Lake _ sir ICS Rockwell -�_ !! LokeW 0/ 5 it, Res It A 1 7 DI 4``\)c36-.Ee / 'i _.J Bro o '. O RB J oThdm,u k -- - c Walker ER CO l Res&) ' g. J/- 0 iRCO8 ia, rD 7 , , I O / HI hland t _ ,fie - _ i 1 11 PowI, Pab Malay' �' -� Ph c —-c Lake W I\ o 1 % I � Marie � �I a iwr Mead , al rsNL 4 -r ._ ''n _ n! AI ,� )/ USGS 1990 XX,CO 100K Minute Quadrangle, TORO'4.0 2005 N Scale in Feet 1 inch=8000 feet • 4000 0 4000 8000 WESTERN ENVIRONMENT Figure 2- Site Location,High Point at Mead AXE ECOLOGY, BW-J. Approximately 595.88 Acres in Section 35 2217 West Powers Avenue, Township 4 North,Range 68 West of the 6th P.M. Littleton,Colorado 80120 Weld County,.Colorado • MN g . 1 w arak rDitch R 7990 @ounty Road DB ! II Aerial Photo from GoogleEarth N Scale in Feet 1 inch=800 feet --- 400 0 400 800 WESTEEN risTr BSONM 1T Figure 2 -Site Map,High Point at Mead AND ECOLOGY,INC, Approximately 595.88 Acres in Section 35 2217 West Powers Avenue, Township 4 North,Range 68 West of the 6th P.M. Littleton,Colorado 80120 Weld County, Colorado General Ecological Resource Survey High Point at Mead-i49.HS Acres in 14'cld( t,nt'.(-°load() Page -5- 3.0 METHODS Species that are federally or state listed as threatened or endangered, including federally proposed and candidate species, occurring or having historically occurred in the Colorado Front Range Piedmont, were considered for this study (Table 1). The county classification was determined by following the Colorado Field Office of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's county checklist (USFWS, 2002). The list was narrowed based on habitat requirements of the species relative to existing habitats on the project. The property was surveyed on February 29, 2008. Information was collected on topography, ecosystems, and species of flora and fauna found on and adjacent to the property. Photographs were taken, and emphasis was placed on potential habitat of threatened and endangered species, and the presence of wetlands. LNe, i'1rT.b4 4 e ,M Y•+ � f�r� ' ✓ 4".." $.0 R - - •G' •15,`6 /� ti ", r�� xr iz` • e ? ,6 V '4" ' Ye4 'rti ..A. SIOL "�T yip Edge of irrigation ditch, and silos southern portion of the site • WESTERN ENVIRONMENT AND ECOLOGY, INC. • General Ecological Resource Survey High Point at Mead-?9i.Mt Acres in Weld Count)..(°lotado Page -6- Table 1. Common name,scientific name,and status of federal and state threatened and endangered species that could occur or historically occurred in the Colorado Piedmont(CDOW,2003;USFWS,2002). Common Name Scientific Name Status' Birds Bald eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus FT, ST Whooping crane Grus americana tabida FE, SE Least Tern Sterna antillarum FE, SE Eskimo curlew Numenius borealis FE, SE Mountain plover Charadrius montanus FPT, SC Mexican spotted owl Strix occidentalis lucida FT, ST Plains Sharp-Tailed Grouse Tympanuchus phasianellus jamesii SE Western burrowing owl Athene cunicularia ST Lesser Prairie Chicken Tympanuchus pallidicinctus ST Ferruginous Hawk Buteo regalis SC Mammals Black-footed ferret Mustela nigripes FE, SE Preble's meadow jumping mouse Zapus hudsonius preblei FT, ST Canada Lynx Lynx canadensis FT, SE Kit Fox Vulpes macrotis SE • Black-tailed prairie dog Cynomys ludovicianus SC Amphibians Boreal Toad Bufo boreas boreas FC, SE Northern Leopard Frog Rana pipiens SC Plants Ute ladies'-tresses Spiranthes diluvialis FT Colorado butterfly plant Gaura neomexicana coloradensis FT Insects Pawnee montane skipper Hesperia leonardus montana FT 'Status Codes: FE=Federally Endangered,FT=Federally Threatened, FPT= Federally Proposed as Threatened, FC=Federal Candidate, SE=State Endangered, ST=State Threatened, SC=State Concerned • WESTERN ENVIRONMENT AND ECOLOGY, INC. General Ecological Resource Survey High Point at Mead-595.88 Acres In Weld C'ounr:.t1 Olt re(IU Page -7- 4.0 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 4.1 Wetlands No perennial waters, wetlands or obvious wetland habitat was observed on the project. However, wetland vegetation does occur adjacent to the project on the southeast. Additionally, the USGS Johnstown 7.5 minute topographic map indicates an ephemeral lake occurring near the center of the Section. Western Environment was unable to identify any indication of such a feature, although a shallow depression was present. It is our opinion that the Farmers Extension Ditch is not jurisdictional as no nexus with a water of the U.S. exists. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) regulates the discharge of dredged or fill materials into Waters of the U.S. under the authority of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. Waters of the U.S. include ephemeral, intermittent and perennial streams, their surface connected wetlands and adjacent wetlands, certain lakes, ponds, drainage ditches and irrigation ditches that have a nexus to interstate commerce. It is the opinion of Western Environment that the area of the annexation, as shown on Figure 2, does not impact waters or habitat subject to Corps • regulations under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. Western Environment evaluated, to the best of our ability based upon site conditions at the time of the survey, the three components of a jurisdictional wetland as defined in the US Army Corp of Engineers, (ACOE) Wetland Delineation Manual (1987). These components are: 1) Vegetation, 2) Soil and 3) Hydrology. The ACOE Manual defines Nonwetlands as "including upland areas that are neither deepwater aquatic habitats, wetlands, nor other special aquatic sites. They are seldom or never inundated, or if frequently inundated, they have saturated soils for only brief periods during the growing season, and, if vegetated, they normally support a prevalence of vegetation typically adapted for life only in aerobic soil conditions." Vegetation on the site consists of cultivated crops including wheat and corn and invasive and introduced species including: Smooth Bromegrass (Bromus inermis), Milkweed (Asclepias sp.), Russian Thistle (Salsola Tragus), and Kochia (Kochia, scoparia). Two large Cottonwood trees (Populus deltoides) are also present adjacent to the Farmers Extension Ditch. A letter was sent to the Corps requesting preliminary concurrence that no Waters of the • U.S. or wetland habitat occurs in the proposed project area(Appendix A). WESTERN ENVIRONMENT AND ECOLOGY, INC. • General Ecological Resource Survey High Point at Mead-?Lc.%8 Aces in Weld(lminr.t_olorado Page -8- 4.2 Wildlife Species Eliminated from Consideration as Occurring on the Project The following threatened and endangered species that have historically been thought to occur in the Colorado Pediment were immediately ruled out of serious consideration for this project based on available habitat: Mexican spotted owl, Eskimo curlew, whooping crane, least tern, Canada lynx, kit fox, black-footed ferret, boreal toad, and Colorado butterfly plant. The Mexican spotted owl was eliminated because it requires forests that are not present on the project. Eskimo curlew was eliminated from consideration because sightings in Colorado are extremely rare, and it is near extinction (Andrews and Righter, 1992). The whooping crane was also eliminated due to rarity in Colorado, and no known nesting or feeding habitat exists on or adjacent to the property. Less than 20 sightings of whooping cranes along the eastern plains and mountainous regions of Colorado have been recorded since 1931 (Andrews and Righter, 1992). The least tern inhabits sandy shorelines of reservoirs, lakes, and rivers with bare sandy shorelines. This shore bird is a casual to very rare spring and fall migrant on the northeastern • plains of Colorado, and is unlikely to occur on the subject project. The Canada lynx is a rare forest-dwelling species of northern latitudes that feeds primarily on snowshoe hares. No lynx habitat exist on the subject site. The kit fox is only known to occur on Colorado's desert slopes ranging from Montrose to Grand Junction. The black-footed ferret was eradicated from the Colorado Piedmont and has not been reintroduced. Colorado's only alpine species of toad, the boreal toad, has been found in spruce-fir forests and alpine meadows at elevations between 7,000 and 12,000 feet. The toad also requires lakes, marshes, ponds, or bogs with shallow water for breeding. These habitats do not exist on the property. The Colorado butterfly plant has only been found in northern Larimer County in recent years and is generally associated with streams that do not exist onsite (Colorado Native Plant Society 1997). • 'WESTERN ENVIRONMENT AND ECOLOGY, INC. General Ecological Resource Survey High Point at Mead-$0$.55 Acre,in A\bid Count'.Colorado Page-9- 4.3 Species Included in Survey y, , Western Burrowing Owl (Athene cunicularia) State Threatened The burrowing owl is found primarily in eastern a Colorado as a summer resident. Two aspects of the • biology of the western burrowing owl appear to influence both its regional and local abundance: 1) it prefers areas '_ s. of short vegetation, and 2) it rarely, if ever, digs its own burrows. Historically, burrowing owls were common wherever there were prairie dog colonies in northeastern I sit Colorado. No prairie dog colonies were observed on or �E , VI* 4 \ adjacent to the project. This migratory species is most N '* a often seen in Colorado during the summer months. Nom +. t". 144y , 1jorbep.com • burrowing owls or their nests were seen in proximity to Western burrowing owl,photo acquired on the project. www.corbis.com. Bald Eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) Federally Threatened, State Threatened No bald eagles or bald eagle nests were observed on the property. In winter bald eagles are transient and use areas that provide feeding and roosting opportunities. There is no permanent water on the property, therefore, it is unlikely that any bald eagles use the site. However, the Cottonwood trees that occur adjacent to the irrigation ditch could, as all trees can, provide roosting site for eagles migrating between food sources. Western Environment contacted the Colorado Division of Wildlife, Area Officer, Eric Lowery on March 5, 2008. Mr. Lowery indicated the nearest active nest is located on the St. Vrain River, 4.5 miles southeast of the site. There is also a nest on the St. Vrain River near the intersection of County Road 17 and County Road 32, approximately 5.0 miles southeast of the site. • WESTERN ENVIRONMENT AND ECOLOGY, INC. • General Ecological Resource Survey High Point at Mead-?95.88 Acras in A Lid(cunt_CoIU@do Page -10- Mountain Plover (Charadrius montanus) State Concerned Species Typical habitat characteristics of the mountain plover are a mixture of short vegetation, bare ground, and a flat topography at both breeding and wintering locations. This small shorebird breeds in Colorado, and in parts of its breeding range the species commonly shows a preference for prairie dog towns and sites that are heavily grazed by domestic livestock. Prairie dog grazing promotes the short grasses that the plover prefers, and their digging creates areas of bare soil important for plover nesting. Plovers breed in Eastern Colorado from approximately April 1s`through August 1st. Mountain plovers were proposed for federal listing as threatened on February 16, 1999 (USFWS, 1999b), however the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service withdrew the proposal on September 8, 2003. The Mountain plover is a migratory bird and protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act. Harassment or destruction of the species or its nest is a federal offense. Therefore, to insure avoidance of the species, development within grazed sites or prairie • dog colonies should begin during plover non-breeding months. Prairie dog colonies that could provide adequate habitat were not observed. No mountain plovers or their nests were observed on the project. Plains Sharp-Tailed Grouse (Tympanuchus phasianellus jamesiz) State Endangered The Plains Sharp-Tailed Grouse historically occurred on Colorado's eastern grasslands. Grouse habitat is characterized by rolling hills with Gambles oak, sage brush, service berries and grassy glades. This grouse is a resident from Alaska east to the Hudson Bay, and south to northern New Mexico. Currently, Colorado populations occur in Douglas County, northern and eastern Weld County, and Logan County east of Sterling. No known populations of the Plains Sharp-Tailed Grouse are known to occur in proximity to the subject project(CDOW, 2008). • WESTERN ENVIRONMENT AND ECOLOGY, INC. • General Ecological Resource Survey High Point at Mead-t4Stt-Acres in Weld Cumin.Coluradn Page-11- Lesser Prairie Chicken (Tympanuchus pallidicinctus) State Threatened Historically, this bird occupied the grasslands of Texas, Oklahoma, New Mexico, Kansas and southeastern Colorado. It prefers sandy grassland areas abundant in midgrasses, sandsage and yucca. The majority of Colorado breeding pairs occur in the southeastern portion of the state in Baca, Prowers, Kiowa and Cheyenne Counties, and for the most part, on the Comanche National Grasslands near Campo. No known populations of the Plains Sharp-Tailed Grouse are known to occur in proximity to the subject project(CDOW, 2008). Ferruginous Hawk(Buteo regalis) State Concerned This hawk is known to occur throughout eastern Colorado and in northwestern Colorado. In Colorado, the species is a common winter resident, but is considered an uncommon summer • resident on the eastern plains (Andrews and Righter, 1992). Areas that could be potential nesting sites include large trees, rock outcrops, manmade structures such as windmills and power poles, or the ,. `• ground. These birds often can be seen associated • with prairie dog colonies, which they utilize for I. 4 •*::7, foraging. This hawk, as are all birds of prey, is ( , 1 • federally protected under the Migratory Bird Species Act. No Ferruginous Hawk habitat was observed on II y{ � 1 . 1 or near the site. et a Preble's Meadow Jumping Mouse • `l (Zap us hudsonius preblei) " ' Typical Preble's habitat has been described as "well- / Federally Threatened, State Threatened 1Yp developed plains riparian vegetation with relatively • Preble's meadow jumping mouse WESTERN ENVIRONMENT AND ECOLOGY, INC. 0 General Ecological Resource Survey High Point at Mead-5')5 g8 Acres in AVeld C uunty COIoUdo Page-12- undisturbed grassland and a water source in close proximity," and "dense herbaceous vegetation consisting of a variety of grasses, forbs and thick shrubs" (Armstrong et al., 1997). Although any vegetation could offer cover and hibernacula for Preble's, the species is mostly known from habitat containing shrub cover, such as willow or narrow-leaf cottonwood. Preble's are known to regularly range outward into adjacent uplands to feed and hibernate. For this reason, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service generally requires a 300 foot development buffer from the edge of the 100 year flood plain. Riparian habitat with a permanent water source likely suitable to Preble's was not observed on or adjacent to the project. A letter was sent to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service requesting a concurrence letter that the project is not likely to disturb Preble's (Appendix B). Black-tailed Prairie Dog (Cynomys ludovicianus) Former Candidate for Federal Listing, State Concerned The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service was petitioned to list the black-tailed prairie dog as a • threatened species in July of 1998. The agency determined on February 3, 2000, that listing the species was warranted, but it is precluded by other species in greater need of protection (USFWS, 2000). The black-tailed prairie dog was added to the candidate list, and the species' status was reviewed annually. On August 12, 2004 the USFWS :- .: determined that the black-tailed prairie dog no longer meets the Endangered ,. ,, - Species Act definition as threatened, and was removed as a candidate for federal listing. No prairie dogs were observed on or adjacent to the property. . Recently planted Winter Wheat WESTERN ENVIRONMENT AND ECOLOGY, INC. alGeneral Ecological Resource Survey High Point at Mead-3'-tl< \ere5 in Weld Cuunt% Colorado Page -13- Ute Ladies'-Tresses Orchid (Spiranthes diluvialis) . Federally Threatened *, ' }1 i , This orchid usually occurs in"...old stream M � al it channels, alluvial terraces, wet meadows, and other sites 7,4-k, - where the soil is saturated to within 18" of the surface at R { least temporarily during the growing seasons" (USFWS, 1' 'Irk`- ,01 , 4; 1992). The eastern Colorado populations of species are f I, µ located in mesic riparian meadows in relict tall grass /` ,, prairie areas near Boulder Creek, South Boulder Creek, ( - and Saint Vrain Creek in Boulder County, Colorado, and in mesic meadows in the riparian woodland understory along I +•k Clear Creek in Jefferson County, Colorado (USFWS 50 I \ t - CFR Part 17). One population was historically identified Cin-'", ,fir " in Weld County east of Greeley near Crow Creek in 1856, ,e. ! 1Ot' ' to • but is now considered extirpated. Soil conditions and !#' S�11: • . s' ' ,4. • G vegetation composition of known Spiranthes sites suggest \,'g p p gg �i: ; :w�/ �1 ..400, I I that wetlands regulated by the Corps under the Clean � Ute Ladies'-Tresses Orchid Water Act qualify as potential Spiranthes habitat. Orchid surveys are required in Boulder and Jefferson Counties, and in the 100-year flood plains and perennial tributaries of the South Platte River, Fountain Creek, and the Yampa Rivers if construction is expected to impact these areas (USFWS 1992). Generally, these surveys must be completed during blooming season (July 20 to August 31). It should be noted that the survey is only required in areas where proposed construction activities are to occur in potential Spiranthes habitat, and only when a Federal permit (for instance a permit to place fill materials into a Waters of the U.S. under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act) or Federal funding is utilized for an activity in those habitats. If a Federal permit or funding is needed for an activity on the project, the agency responsible for issuing the permit or providing the funds would consult the Service to determine how the action may affect the species or its designated critical habitat. The • Service would then work with the agency and/or landowner to modify the project and minimize WESTERN ENVIRONMENT AND ECOLOGY, INC. General Ecological Resource Survey High Point at Mead-?95.88 Aare,in W-ld Cwmir,( oloruclo Page -14- impacts. No perennial waters occur on the property, nor is Spiranthes designated Critical Habitat. It is the opinion of Western Environment that Spiranthes does not inhabit the project. Pawnee montane skipper(Hesperia leonardus montana) Federally Threatened This butterfly occurs in dry, open Ponderosa pine woodlands at an elevation range of 6,000 to 7,000 feet within the Pikes Peak Granite formation. Assessment of the skipper indicates that the insect's habitat is centered near Deckers, Colorado, with their range estimated to be 37.9 square miles (USFWS, 1998). The adult butterflies emerge from their pupae in late July for feeding and mating. The females then deposit their eggs on the leaves of blue grama grass, the larval food supply. Little is known about the larval and pupal stages of the species. Recent surveys of the skipper suggest that their populations may be at an all time high(recorded) after the Hayman Fire of 2002 (Colorado Natural Heritage Program, January 2005). This is likely due • to the necessity of fire to remove trees, and promote herbaceous grass growth including blue grama and gayfeather on the forest floor. The subject project does not occur in known Pawnee montane skipper habitat. Other Wildlife No other wildlife was observed on the property at the time of the site survey. • WESTERN ENVIRONMENT AND ECOLOGY, INC. General Ecological Resource Survey High Point at Mead-$Li SX c in \\Lid Crnuvr. {tdorad(' Page -15- 5.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS At the time of the survey, no threatened or endangered species or their obvious habitat were seen on the subject site. Responses are expected from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers concurring that no wetlands or Waters of the U.S. subject to regulation under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act occur in the proposed work areas and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service regarding the lack of Prebles's habitat on the project. No other ecological issues were identified with the site. • WESTERN ENVIRONMENT AND ECOLOGY, INC. General Ecological Resource Survey High Point at Mead-SySBX Acn>in \\Lid(.(unI\.Cnlnr"do Page-16- 6.0 LITERATURE CITED Andrews, R. and R. Righter. 1992. Colorado birds: a reference to their distribution and habitat. Denver Museum of Natural History. Denver. 442 pp. Armstrong, D.M., M.E. Bakeman, A. Deans, C.A. Meaney, and T.R. Ryon. 1997. Conclusions and recommendations in: Report on habitat findings on the Preble's meadow jumping mouse. Edited by M. E. Bakeman. Report to USFWS and Colorado Division of Wildlife. Bechard, M.J., Knight, D.G., Smith, and R.E. Fitzner. 1990. Nest sites and habitats of sypatric hawks (Buteo spp.) Washington Journal of Field Ornithology 61:159-170. Colorado Division of Wildlife. 1999. Endangered, Threatened, and Special Concern Wildlife Colorado Division of Wildlife. November 2003. Conservation Plan for Grassland Species in Colorado. Colorado Grassland Species Working Group. November 2003. Denver, Co. Colorado Division of Wildlife. 2006. Natural Diversity Information Source Maps. Last • Updated September, 2006. Colorado Native Plant Society. 1997. Rare plants of Colorado, 2nd edition. Falcon Press® Publishing Co., Inc. and Rocky Mountain Nature Association in cooperation with Colorado Native Plant Society. Helena, Montana and Estes Park, Colorado. 105 pp. Colorado Natural Heritage Program. January 2005. Pawnee Montane Skipper Post-fire Habitat Assessment Survey, September 2004. Fitzgerald, J.P., C.A. Meaney, and D.M. Armstrong. 1994. Mammals of Colorado. Denver Museum of Natural History and University Press of Colorado. Niwot, Colorado. 467 pp. Graul, W.D. 1975. Breeding biology of the mountain plover. Wilson Bulletin 87:6-31. Hoogland, John L. 1995. The Black-tailed Prairie Dog. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago and London. Jennings, W.F. 1989. Final report. Species studied: Eustoma grandiflorum, Spiranthes diluvialis, Malaxis brachypoda,Hypoxis hirsuta, Physaria bellii,Aletes humilis. Unpublished report prepared for the Nature Conservancy under the Colorado Natural History Small Grants • Program. The Nature Conservancy, Boulder, Colorado. 48 pp. WESTERN ENVIRONMENT AND ECOLOGY, INC. General Ecological Resource Survey-Deer C7eek Dine and Luuntc Read I o LnprcUemenk.I It+crt( nuri (olurado Page -17- Jennings, W.F. 1990. Final report. Species studied: Spiranthes diluvialis, Sisyrinchium pallidum. Unpublished report prepared for The Nature Conservancy under the Colorado Natural History Small Grants Program. The Nature Conservancy, Boulder, Colorado. 29 pp. Jones, S.R. 1998. Burrowing owl. Pages 220-221 in H.E. Kingery, ed. Colorado breeding bird atlas. Colorado Bird Atlas Partnership. Denver. Kingery, H.E. 1998. Colorado breeding bird Atlas. Colorado Bird Atlas Partnership. Denver. Long, Kim. Prairie Dogs, A Wildlife Handbook, Johnson Books, Boulder, 2002. National List of Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands, Region 4, 5, and 8, Resource Management Group, Inc., Michigan, 1994. Nichols, F.E. and J.A. Daley. 1995. 1995 Prairie Dog Counts on the Cathy Fromme Prairie. Professional report submitted to the Fort Collins Natural Resources Department. 8p. Remote Sensing Research. 1996. 1996 Coyote Ridge Prairie Dog Study. Professional report submitted to the City of Fort Collins Natural Resources Department. Sibley, David Allen. 2000. The Sibley Guide to Birds. Alfred A. Knopf, Inc. New York. • Tileston, J.V., and R.R. Lechleitner. 1966. Some Comparisons of the Black-tailed and White- tailed Prairie Dogs in North-central Colorado. American Midland Naturalist 75:292-316. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, Soil Survey of Adams County, Colorado. Historical Replica, October 1974. U.S. Department of Agriculture,NRCS. 2001. The PLANTS Database, Version 3.1 (http://plants.usda.gov). National Plant Data Center, Baton Rouge, LA 70874-4490 USA U.S. Department of Agriculture. No date. Midwestern wetland flora: Field office guide to plant species. USDA Soil Conservation Service, Midwest National Technical Center, Lincoln, Nebraska. Jamestown, ND: Northern Prairie Wildlife Research Center Home Page http://www.npwrc.usgs.gov/resource/othrdata/pintguid/pintguid.htm (Version 16JUL97). U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Region 6, Pawnee Montane Skipper Butterfly Recovery Plan. September, 1998 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Ecological Services Colorado Field Office, Federally Listed and • Candidate Species and Their Status in Colorado, August 21,2001. WESTERN ENVIRONMENT AND ECOLOGY, INC. General Ecological Resource Survey-l) cr(leek Ihn(end Count'Road I Sri Improve-lent,I Then Count, (olmado Page -18- U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 1999. Interim Survey Guidelines for Preble's Meadow Jumping Mouse. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 1992. Interim Survey Requirements for Spiranthes Diluvialis. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 1999b. Services proposes to list mountain plover as threatened. News Release 99-02. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Fish and Wildlife Service Proposes to Remove the Preble's Meadow Jumping Mouse from the Endangered Species List, News Release. Jan. 28, 2005. Whitson, Tom, et al. 2000. Weeds of the West. Western Society of Weed Science,Newark, CA. e WESTERN ENVIRONMENT AND ECOLOGY, INC. • APPENDICES • • WESTERN ENVIRONMENT AND ECOLOGY, INC. • APPENDIX A USACOE CONCURRENCE LETTER • WESTERN ENVIRONMENT AND ECOLOGY, INC. \t-Es 1,Ej J N E N] EN O ECOLOGY INC • March 5, 2008 Terry McKee U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Denver Regulatory Office 9307 South Wadsworth Blvd. Littleton, Colorado 80218-6901 Subject: Jurisdiction Determination, Douthit Annexation 595.88 Acres in Section 35, Township 4 North, Range 68 West, Weld County, Colorado. Western Environment and Ecology, Inc. Project Number 493-001-01. Dear Mr. McKee: Western Environment and Ecology, Inc. (Western Environment), on behalf CH2M Hill Inc., seeks concurrence from the Corps that no wetlands or Waters of the U.S. occur on the above referenced property. The site is located northeast of the intersection of Weld County Road 38 and the east frontage road for Interstate Highway 25, in Weld County, Colorado (Figure 1). The project has approximate coordinates of 40.272111N -104.970011E decimal degrees. At the time of this investigation the site was in non-irrigated wheat cultivation in the west and northern most fields. The southeast portion of the property, which could be irrigated, was also planted in wheat. With the exception of two small metal grain silos, no structures occur on the property. A microwave relay station occupies approximately 20 acres along the western • border of the site. Additionally, an abandoned dairy and cattle feedlot are present southeast of the project (Figure 2). Several petroleum production wells and associate facilities also occur on the property. The Farmer's Extension Ditch bisects the project flowing from west to east. The ditch, which is concrete lined, ends approximately five miles to the east of the Douthit Project. It is our opinion that the Farmers Extension Ditch is not jurisdictional, as no nexus with a water of the US exists. No perennial waters, wetlands or obvious wetland habitat was observed on the project. However, wetland vegetation does occur adjacent to the project on the southeast. The approximate mean elevation of the property is 5,075 feet above sea level (USGS Johnstown 7.5 Minute Quadrangle, 1988). Topography is gently rolling hills with 1 to 9 % slopes. Site soils include Nunn clay loam. Wiley-Colby complex, interspersed with Colby loam, and Otero sandy loam (NRCS), overlying the Cretaceous age Pierre Shale(Tweto 1979). Prior to submital for a request for annexation, it is necessary to obtain a concurrence letter from the Corps that the property, as indicated on Figure 2, either does not contain wetlands or Waters of the U.S., or as planed will not impact Waters of the U.S. Attached are photographs illustrating current site conditions. Again, I look forward to receiving your response. As always, do not hesitate to contact me with any questions you may have. Sincerely, WESTERN ENVIRONMENT AND ECOLOGY, INC. Greg D. Sherman P.G. • President att. 2,217 WEST POWERS $,VENUE, . LITT'L,ETON„ C'OLO,S,ADO 8012,0 PRONE (303)730-345.2 ' FAX (303)730-3461 W W W.WESTERNE,N V IRON ME,NT.COM M. , • iti 1' �p�*f° ti's. . H We ► kt %T • -• J, 1,411* `L` eases �~ Farmers Extension Ditch On South Project Boundary • # y� ,yryyV.T r;yc _ yq��, : 0 6 T fit . .i::•,. . View To North Of Fallow Wheat Field • `- / v er w..m*,• �� v ', S - I p / a b 'n, i .S t$ r4, l f r ' t. 9ie la` a xX' s i> l? d/ ltd.. i i as . sir n/y 7i•-4=;,'i 'tic"; is;tick fi}Tlt., v:I\-- ;IA= {'a Soil Sample Adjacent To Ditch Southeast Field • u - ` „y� iY A ' {' 4': ' " ' te t1, A,.E•�cj " .y., •,. ;,1,-.4“\k! 4-,,,,,,:;1„-4,y.„\., d k �y s;',;:"A' , , ,t,n ft Farmers Extension Ditch View To East • • Wheat Field View To East • '11!)t- . t, iq.xs :4 /I! k'l i # Nth fr.yfi"' ': J v WF cl rye... ` .. Wetland Vegetation South Of Project Adjacent To WC Road 38 • qCV\-mil-1 I E/piT Op 4�o �/;\��,� DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY 4{' ��/ � CORPS OF ENGINEERS, OMAHA DISTRICT C°51A,,,, DENVER REGULATORY OFFICE, 9307 S. Wadsworth Boulevard F I! LITTLETON, COLORADO 80128-6901 e t. e March 20, 2008 \�l4ns U[-_-_,---S Mr. Greg Sherman Western Environment and Ecology, Inc. 2217 West Powers Avenue Littleton, CO 80120 RE: Douthit Annexation 595.88 Acres Corps File No. NWO-2008-758-DEN Dear Mr. Sherman: Reference is made to the above-referenced project located in the SW %of Section 35, T4N, R68W, Weld County, Colorado. This project has been reviewed by Mr. Terry MclCee of my office in accordance with Section 404 of the Clean Water Act under which the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers regulates the discharge of dredged and fill material, and any excavation activity associated with a dredge and fill project in waters of the United States. My office agrees with your March 5, 2008 report, which identifies there are no wetlands or tributaries on this property. The Farmer's Extension Ditch is not waters of the U.S. Based on the information provided, a Department of the Army (DA) Permit will not be required for work at this site. Although a DA Permit will not be required for the project, this does not eliminate the requirement that other applicable federal, state, and local permits be obtained as needed. If there are any questions call Mr.Terry McKee of my office at (303) 979-4120 and reference Corps File No. NWO-2008-758-DEN. Sincerely, Ti .thy T. Car y Chi Denver -gill' tory Offi e tm WESTERN ENVIRONMENT AND EcOLOG J INC March 5, 2008 Susan Linner U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Ecological Services Colorado Field Office P.O. Box 25486, DFC (MS 65412 Denver, Colorado 80225-0486 Subject: Preble's Meadow Jumping Mouse Habitat Exclusion, Douthit Annexation 595.88 Acres, Section 35, Township 4 North, Range 68 West, Weld County, Colorado. Western Environment and Ecology, Inc. Project Number 493-001-01. Dear Ms. Linner: Western Environment and Ecology, Inc. (Western Environment), on behalf of CH2M Hill Inc., completed a Preble's habitat assessment of the above mentioned project. The site is located northeast of the intersection of Weld County Road 38 and the east frontage road for Interstate Highway 25, in Weld County, Colorado (Figure 1). The project has approximate coordinates of 39.92824N -105.12522E decimal degrees. At the time of this investigation the site was in non-irrigated wheat cultivation in the west and northern most fields. The southeast portion of the property, which could be irrigated, was also planted in wheat. With the exception of two small metal grain silos, no structures occur on the property. A microwave relay station occupies approximately 20 acres along the western border of the site. Additionally, an abandoned dairy and cattle feedlot are present southeast of the project(Figure 2). Several petroleum production wells and associate facilities also occur on • the property. The Farmer's Extension Ditch bisects the project flowing from west to east. The ditch, which is concrete lined, ends approximately five miles to the east of the Douthit Project. No perennial waters, wetlands or obvious wetland habitat was observed on the project. However, wetland vegetation does occur adjacent to the project on the southeast. The approximate mean elevation of the property is 5,075 feet above sea level (USGS Johnstown 7.5 Minute Quadrangle, 1988). Topography is gently rolling hills with 1 to 9 % slopes. Site soils include Nunn clay loam, Wiley-Colby complex, interspersed with Colby loam, and Otero sandy loam (NRCS), overlying the Cretaceous age Pierre Shale(Tweto 1979). Vegetation on the site consists of cultivated crops including wheat and corn and invasive and introduced species including: Smooth Bromegrass (Bromus inermis), Milkweed (Asclepias sp.), Russian Thistle (Salsola Tragus), and Kochia (Kochia, scoparia). Two large Cottonwood trees (Populus deltoides) are present adjacent to the Farmers Extension Ditch. Prior to submital for a request for annexation, it is necessary to obtain an exclusion letter from the Service. Based on habitat information and the attached photos, Western Environment seeks concurrence from the Service that annexation and subsequent development of the Douthit Property is unlikely to impact Preble's habitat. I look forward to receiving your response. Sincerely, WESTERN ENVIRONMENT AND ECOLOGY, INC. Greg D. Sherman President att. cc. Josh Hooper, CH2M Hill • 2217 "WEST POWERS AVENUE, L,I fl TON, COLORADO 80120 PHONE (303)730-3452 * FA% (303)730-3461 www WESTErtNENVERONMENT.C'om .gyp.... < l t • Farmers Extension Ditch View To Southwest }}f r . „� At a la; .q,.�S� rA'. ,• rk� d �* J ✓• Farmers Extension Ditch At South Project Boundary • • • L , ft . View Of Fallow Wheat From South Boundary • Winter Wheat In Southeast Field • • View From Center Of Douthit Project To South • i:w.. View From Center Of Douthit Project To North • 2008703-20 13:52 > 3037303461 P 2/2 • STE N t Q}' T 4 EQOLOGT, INC March 5,2008 I a:s.Psi{AND WratiFF SERVICE ntCE9b,ElD, CONCUR NO EPIC;i Susan Limner i', rJR NOT' '°Lc Toni)•: ELY Abr CT R 1 12006 U.S.Fish and Wildlife Service G OR C Ecological Services / Colorado Field Office MAP 1.9 ?q08 I P.O.Box 25486,DFC(MS 65412 OLOR4DO€ELD gatehvisoa (DATE) Denver,Colorado 80225-0486 usan C. Un' r Subject: Preble's Meadow Jumping Mouse Habitat Exclusion,Douthit Annexation 595.88 Acres, Section 35,Township 4 North.Range 68 West,Weld County, Colorado. Western Environment and Ecology,Inc.Project Number 493-001-01. Dear Ms. Limier: Western Environment and Ecology,Inc. (Western Environment), on behalf of CH2M Frill Inc., completed a Preble's habitat assessment of the above mentioned project The site is located northeast of the intersection of Weld County Road 38 and the east frontage road for Interstate Highway 25,in Weld County,Colorado(Figure 1). The project has approximate coordinates of 40.272111N-104.970011E.decimal degrees. At the time of this investigation the site-was&in'non-irrigated•wheat cultivation m the west and northern most fields.,The southeast portion of the property,which could be irrigated, was also planted in wheat. With the exception of two small metal grain silos,no structures occur on the property. A microwave relay station occupies approximately 20 acres along the western border of the site. Additionally,an abandoned daisy and cattle feedlot are present southeast of the project(Figure 2). Several petroleum production wells and associate facilities also occur on the property- The emner's Extension Ditch-bisects the projectil Cuing from'west to east. Theditch, which is concrete lined,ends approximately five miles to the east of the Douthit Project. No perennial waters,wetlands or obvious wetland habitat was observed on the project. However, wetland vegetation does occur adjacent to the project on the southeast. The approximate mean elevation of the property is 5,075 feet above sea level (USGS Johnstown 7.5 Minute Quadrangle, 1988). Topography is gently rolling hills with 1 to 9 % slopes. Site soils include Nunn clay loam,Wiley-Colby complex,interspersed with Colby loam, and Otero sandy loam(MRCS),overlying the Cretaceous age Pierre Sba.e(Tweto 1979). Vegetation on the site consists of cultivated crops'including wheat and corn and invasive and introduced species including: Smooth Bromegrass'(Bromus inenhis);Milkweed(9sclepias sp.),Russian Thistle(Salsala Tragus), and Kochia(Kochia, scoparia). Two large Cottonwood trees(Populus deltoides)are present adjacentto the Farmers Extension Ditch. ' Prior to submital for a request for annexation,it is necessary to obtain an exclusion letter from the Service. Based on habitat information and the attached photos,Western Environment seeks concurrence from the Service that annexation and subsequent development of the Douthit Property is unlikely to impact Preble's habitat. I look forward to receiving your response. Sincerely, WESTE (FNV QNME',NT AND ECOLOGY, NC. Gre President ' att. cc. Josh Hooper, CH2M Hill • P?-t7 'r POWEUS avt z n "r<,iir-rT.r]4T04w, cozortaze aot2O PflON r'.(SO,al`A3a-345A'raax (soar/au-34s1 vw w,wortsirzazirssisrviatonmunortm • High Point at Mead Preliminary Traffic Report Mead, Colorado Prepared for: 411 HD Path of Growth Partners, Ltd. & 1-25 and 389 Partners, Ltd. 5953 Dallas Parkway, Suite 200-A Plano, TX 75093 Prepared by: CH2M HILL, Inc. 9191 South Jamaica Street Englewood, CO 80112-5946 CH2MHILL Project No. 368816 CH2MHILL May 2008 • HIGH POINT AT MEAD TRIP GENERATION STUDY • TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM CH2MHILL High Point at Mead Trip Generation Study Introduction A development, High Point at Mead, is proposed for annexation into the town of Mead. A trip generation study was performed in support of this annexation proposal. This memo documents the study and reports the projected number of trips generated as well as recommended roadway requirements to accommodate these volumes. The site is located east of I-25 and north of County Road 38, extending approximately one mile east and one mile north as shown in purple in the Vicinity Map, Figure 1. There are two portions of the site which are not a part of the development (shown in white in Figure 1): the southeast corner and the existing AT&T property adjacent to the frontage road. The site is bounded by existing roads to the west and south. The southern boundary is County Road (CR) 38,which is currently a gravel road between I-25 and CR 13 with no posted speed. The western boundary is the I-25 Frontage Road,which is a paved 2-way street parallel to the interstate. Interstate access is provided at the CR 34 interchange to the south or to the north at CR 44. 1 lj CRea - — • a _ _.. CR40 _ _. High Poinl at Mend ■ CR 13 w< CR JB f M •nd:CO :, '.. Cfl CR 34 Figure 1. Vicinity Map DEN/MEAD TRAFFIC 1.DOC 2 COPYRIGHT 2008 BY CH2M HILL,INC.•COMPANY CONFIDENTIAL HIGH POINT AT MEAD TRIP GENERATION STUDY • Volumes Background The background traffic volumes assumed in this area are based on the 2030 Traffic Forecasts from the Mead Transportation Plan (2006). These volumes were projected based on the existing traffic volumes and the proposed developments in the area. Figure 2 shows these daily background traffic volumes. Site Generated The preliminary plans for High Point at Mead consist of 1036 dwelling units for single family residential,300 dwelling units for multi-family residential, 81.9 acres (3,568,000 SF) of mixed-use development, and 61.3 acres (2,670,000 SF) of commercial area. Using a Floor- Area Ratio as 0.25, the following square footages were used in the trip generation: - Mixed-Use: 892,000 Square Feet - Commercial: 668,000 Square Feet Since specific land uses are not defined at this time, 15 percent of the commercial area is assumed to be a shopping center and the other 85 percent general office. Using ITE Trip Generation procedures for these land uses, this development will generate approximately 26,850 total vehicle trips per day,as shown in Table 1. Given the land uses are residential and shopping and retail, there will be trips within the development that do not affect the external network. Using the ITE Internal Capture • worksheet to determine the interaction between the proposed land uses, it was estimated that 12 percent of these 26,850 trips would remain internal to the development. Thus, an additional 23,600 vehicle-trips per day would be added to the existing roadway network. Distributing these trips to the external network based on existing travel patterns and proposed future development yielded the following percentages: - 40% North - 50% South - 5% East - 5% West These distributions resulted in the following additional trips to the external roadway network, as seen in Figure 3: - 9,400 North on the Frontage Road to I-25 and Loveland or Greeley - 11,800 South on the Frontage Road to I-25 and Longmont or Denver - 1,200 East on either CR 38 or the future road to Johnstown or Greeley - 1,200 West on CR 38 to Mead Total Volumes The total volumes are the sum of the 2030 background volumes and the site-generated • volumes, as shown in Figure 4. DEN/MEAD TRAFFIC 1.DOC 3 COPYRIGHT 2008 BY CH2M HILL,INC.•COMPANY CONFIDENTIAL HIGH POINT AT MEAD TRIP GENERATION STUDY • County Road 40 w g 3 3 K LL • 6.600 6,800 6,800 County Road 38 vi Figure 2. 2030 Background Daily Traffic • DEN/MEAD TRAFFIC lDOC 4 COPYRIGHT 2008 BY CH2M HILL,INC.•COMPANY CONFIDENTIAL • LO 0 O Co co O N N in o r F Co r .- N (o Co m co y N G O _ in - U) N (o ~ o CO (0 07 U) CO >` 2 m 0. E U) o E (n 0 0 C LO N CO N O C0 — a N 0 O O It .5 LI3 F CO 0 CO 0) N 0 N CO CJ A 0 a c TO F 5c‘i _ c 0 0 n _ c Q C C C U) 0 U) L O 0 C - Co 0 co ((0 ((0 co CO in itl C N 0 C O O w 0 cm 0 • O N 0 0 0 in (00 C _ o ca co CO F Co m ((00 U) CO N CO N 0_ D F co a co w O F • ~ N U) 0 U)) (LO N0 T N O V N M N N U O O C 0 0 0 o w E U) U) O N in L_ N C 7 0)) co N CO N N r w ro 'TIE. F C • y D -O "O Y Y in N N N N L_ >, C O co co cv C To N Co O N N 0 w 5 ^ C 0 0 0 W CO in 0C 0 tl — r C o cu 0 cn C U U C N N N 0 w a F C N N O N O N C 0 N s a) = J Q 0 _' w o 00 N O c O 0 ti 0 N C N c Cf ii 0 0 N Y 6 • 0 C0 N W N C .� N O N o o '7,, C O j 0 CD w CC ovals)'r) a (7 ¢ m a T 0 E — a ~ I- 3 C ~ (n LL (V Li 0 N C .. -0 0 N 7 m a EE ~ y a x • _i c ._ m E E 0 c > > w c x I`° al to 0 U r W u) _ • s v_ 40% 5.504 County Road 40 n a cc t LL 5% 1200 • 5% 1 200 13,000 7,500 50% County Road 3£1 co_ tly Figure 3. Trip Distribution and Site Generated Daily Traffic • HIGH POINT AT MEAD TRIP GENERATION STUDY • Recommendations On-Site Improvements Applying these volumes to the roadway classifications from the Mead Transportation Plan (2006), suggests the following infrastructure improvements are necessary to accommodate the site-generated traffic: - Build CR 40 as a two lane minor arterial from CR 9.5 to the Frontage Road - Pave and widen CR 38 to a four lane minor arterial - Build CR 9.5 as a four lane collector running north-south through the site - Construct an additional two lane north-south road between I-25 and CR 9.5 - Construct an additional two lane east-west collector road between CR 38 and CR 40, along with an extension south to connect with CR 38 - Construct a two lane loop collector road through the site to provide access from the residential areas to the grid roads These improvements should be constructed to the Mead standards as outlined in the Mead Transportation Plan. The phasing of these improvements can be determined once the development phasing is established. Off-Site Improvements The 2030 volume projection for the Frontage Road suggests a two lane major arterial • roadway would be required. The Mead Transportation Plan also indicates a possible new interchange at CR 38 or CR 40, which would provide direct access to support this development as well as those that are west of I-25. These improvements fit into the Mead Transportation Plan,but specific coordination would be needed with other future transportation and development plans in this area. • DEN/MEAD TRAFFIC 1.DOC 7 COPYRIGHT 2008 BY CH2M HILL,INC.•COMPANY CONFIDENTIAL • kr v 5,500 County Road 40 'oi 0 cc S IL 1,200 • / 8.000 19,800 14,300 County Road 38 co Figure 4. 2030 Daily Traffic • • Statement of Community Need As development moves north and south along 1-25, supporting employment centers such as Boulder, Longmont, and Loveland the growth will likely exceed the 3% annual growth expectation. Both Weld County and the Town of Mead have planned for and experienced this type of growth recently and should expect this trend to continue due to their proximity to high growth communities, employment centers and ease of access to I-25. Furthermore, Northern Colorado's allure is enhanced by its desirable climate, unobstructed views of the Front Range, recreation opportunities, advanced education centers, and agricultural heritage. The proposed development's response to the projected demand for housing, goods and services and community facilities in the Mead area are as follows: Expanded Availability of Goods and Services An estimated 535,000 square feet of commercial, retail and employment are planned with this development and will support both the existing and future developments of the Town. The tax basis created by a commercial development of this magnitude can assist the Town of Mead in generating bonds and or advancing Capital Improvement Programs that benefit the entire community. Increased Tax Revenues Consistent with the Town's comprehensive planning objective of balancing residential development and diversifying its tax base, the preliminary fiscal analysis estimates that this development can generate up to a net of 22.5 million dollars of one-time revenues with a potential of 5.6 million dollars of net annual revenues. Expanded Housing Opportunities The conceptual master plan proposes the construction of up to 1,036 single family detached homes, 400 multi-family homes and a mixed use component that could partially develop into a high density town center atmosphere. This approach presents a multitude of opportunities in diversity of housing types. This diversity will result in a variety of housing types, lot sizes, lot types, as well as price ranges. Examples can include single family detached, alley load,common area detached, townhomes,condominiums, and apartments. Open Space,Active and Passive Recreation Improvements The High Point at Mead property has been planned to create a healthy community based environment. This environment is created through an interconnected passive and active open space program that includes up to 106 acres of undeveloped property. At build out, the open space will contain parkland with passive and active recreational areas, landscaped rights-of-way and transitional buffer zones. The parklands shall be consistent in intent and character with the comprehensive master plan as adopted by the Town of Mead. • • Contributions to Public Infrastructure The High Point development intends to contribute its proportionate share to the Town of Mead's current infrastructure. Examples of anticipated infrastructure improvements can include the construction of County Road 9.5 through the development, the extension of County Road 38 adjacent to the development,parklands and open space within the development, as well as sanitary tap fees that support the issuance of the sanitary treatment facility bond. • • • Statement of School Impact The High Point at Mead property is bisected in the east/west direction by the Johnstown/St. Vrain Valley School District boundary line. The discussions with both districts have led to the understanding that the Site will likely be served by both school districts. The respective yield rates for each district have been utilized in the following tables to calculate the approximate number of students generated at full build out. Johnstown School District Impact Current Standard Percent of number of Units' Yield Rate Projected Student Yield Facility Facility Standard Capacity Occupancy Capacity Single Multi- Single Multi- Single Multi- Family Family Family Family Family Family2 Elementary 518 200 0.345 0.177 1787 35.4 550 550 37.3% Middle 518 200 0.17 0.087 88.1 17.4 550 550 18.4% School High 518 200 0.195 0.1 101 20 700 1000 11.6% School Total 0.71 0.364 368 73 III 1. The school district boundary line bisects the High Point at Mead property therefore the total number of units is halved. 2. The multi-family(ME)yield rates are based on the ratio of the MF occupancy rate of 1.9 to the single family(SF)occupancy rate of 3.7 multiplied by the SF yield rate. St. Vrain School District Impact Current Standard Percent of Number of Units' Yield Rate Projected Student Yield Facility Facility Standard Capacity Occupancy Capacity Single Multi- Single Multi- Single Multi- Family Family Family Family Family Family Elementary 518 200 0.22 0.15 114.0 30 483 525 26.0% Middle 518 200 0.1 0.06 51.8 12 645 750 8.1% School High 518 200 0.11 0.06 57 12 1308 1200 5.5% School Total 0.43 0.27 223 54 1. The school district boundary line bisects the High Point at Mead property therefore the total number of units is halved. • • While the School District impacts noted are based on the assumption that the numbers of single family and multi-family dwellings will be split evenly between the Johnstown School District and the St. Vrain School District, it is understood and acknowledged that final allocations between the Districts will be dependent upon the final platting of the property. Applicant fully expects and intends to cooperate with the St. Vrain School District with respect to any School Capital Mitigation Fee, "cash in lieu of land" fees or similar charges typically assessed by the District with respect to similar projects. Applicant also fully expects and intends to cooperate with the Johnstown School District with respect to any capital mitigation fees, "cash in lieu of land" fees or similar charges typically assessed by the District with respect to similar projects. • • • Development Impact Assessment Statements General Site Location and Description The High Point at Mead (Site) is located in unincorporated Weld County,at the northeast corner of Interstate-25 (I-25) and County Road 38 (CR 38) and bound by future CR 11 to the east and future CR 40 to the north. The property contains a portion of the south half of Section 26 and a portion of Section 35, Township 4 North, Range 68 West,6Th P.M. as well as a portion of the north half of Section 2,Township 3 North, Range 68 West, 6th P.M. The 595 acre development will consist of single family and multi-family residential,commercial, open space and mixed use development. 6.1 Water The High Point at Mead property is located within the Little Thompson Water District (LTWD). A Preliminary Utility Report is included with the petition for annexation and assesses the impacts of the proposed development. The LTWD has several water lines running along the Site boundaries and is believed to have adequate pressure to supply the proposed demands. Off the southwest corner of the Site is an existing meter vault which can regulate water pressure depending on the overall demands. The point of connection will likely be near the vault but will ultimately be determined by the LTWD. The applicant is currently in discussion with the LTWD and will be obtaining a 'will serve' notice prior to • final approval. Based on the proposed land use plan the overall average daily flow (ADF) is approximately 839 gallons per minute (gpm). 6.2 Sewer The High Point at Mead property is located within the Town of Mead Sanitation District. A Preliminary Utility Report is included with the petition for annexation and assesses the impacts of the proposed development. The Town of Mead is currently in the process of constructing a new wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) which will be operational November 2008 and will serve the proposed Site. A 'will serve' letter from the Town of Mead Sanitation District has been included in the petition for annexation. The development of the full 595 acres will generate a combined average daily flow (ADF) of approximately 0.795 million gallons per day (mgd). The WWTP will have an available capacity of 0.5 mgd upon completion in November 2008 and expand to 1.0 mgd with future development. The WWTP will treat the existing Town of Mead effluent of 0.135 mgd in November 2008. 6.3 Natural Gas The natural gas provider of the Site will be SourceGas. The applicant has contacted Joe Valdez, the regional SourceGas representative and has received a 'will serve' letter for the proposed Site. • • 6.4 Electric The electric service to the Site will be provided by United Power. The applicant has contacted Monica Hansen,District Representative and has received a 'will serve'letter for the proposed Site. 6.5 Telephone The telephone and communication systems will be provided by Qwest. The applicant has contacted Bart Garner, Field Engineer and has received a 'will serve' letter for the proposed Site. 6.6 Streets The High Point at Mead property will build the necessary improvements to CR 38 for access to the Site. Currently, CR 38 is the only gravel road accessing the Site. The design of CR 38 will be based on the Town of Mead Transportation Plan and the Standard Design Criteria and Construction Requirements. The developer will work with the Town Planning Commission to integrate future expansion into the roadway design. At this time, CR 38 is likely the only road to receive improvements and will preliminarily be the primary point of access. However, future development of the region will initiate more roadway development. The paved frontage road will be removed during construction. The proposed internal roadway design has been based on the Weld County Code. If necessary the applicant will contact CDOT for permission to work in the I-25 right of way. A preliminary traffic report has been included with the petition for annexation. 6.7 Drainage The existing topography of High Point at Mead divides the Site naturally into two watersheds. Historically, runoff generated south of the ridge ultimately releases to the St. Vrain River, while runoff generated to the north ultimately releases to the Little Thompson River. The existing property primarily consists of agricultural fields with oil and gas appurtenances scattered throughout. The existing slopes range from one to ten percent along the drainage paths that release offsite. The proposed drainage design has been in conformance with the Town of Mead Storm Drainage Criteria and Construction Standards. A Preliminary Drainage Report is included with the petition for annexation and includes historic release rates, detention pond sizing and discussion of the hydrologic characteristics and drainage patterns. 6.8 Law Enforcement The High Point at Mead property is currently under the protection of the Weld County Sheriff's Department. Upon annexation, law enforcement will be provided by the Town of Mead through its contract with the Weld County Sheriff's Department. • • 6.9 Fire protection The proposed Site is bisected by the Johnstown/Mountain View Fire District boundary line. However, an intergovernmental agreement states that any parcel annexed into the Town of Mead shall be serviced by the Mountain View Fire District. The applicant has contacted Randy Templeton, Mountain View Fire Chief and has received a 'will serve' letter for the proposed Site. 6.10 Parks and Open Space The proposed parks and open space areas are designed in conformance with the Town of Mead Design Standards. A rate of .08 acres per unit was used to calculate the park/open space requirement in the residential areas. A rate of eight percent of the gross commercial acreage was used to calculate the park/open space requirement in commercial and mixed use areas. The total open space requirement for the High Point at Mead Site is 126.3 acres. The High Point at Mead concept plan has been designed to provide 130.5 acres of open space. The following tables show the requirements and the overall breakdown of open space which does not include detention facilities. Open Space Requirements NUMBER GROSS RESIDENTIALCOMMERCIAL TOTAL OPEN LAN BUSE OF UU'ILS AREA DESIGN DESIGN SPACE (AC) REQUIREMENTS REQUIREMENTS REQUIRED SINGLY FAMILY 1036 1036 N/A 08 AC/1 NI'T 62.88 nunIi- r ,H1f1 N/A o3 AC/UNIT - 32(,0 FAM COMMERCIAL N/A SI 9 H%of GROSS AREA 6.66 MIXED USE N/A 6)3 - 8%of GROSS AREA %20 TOTAL 126.3% OPEN SPACE REQUIREMENTS ARE RASED THE.TOWN OE MEAD LAND USE&DEVIJ.OPMENT CODE. • • Open Space Delineation 'IY)"CAI. PERCENTAGE OF 'I'OT'A!.OPEN SPACE ['ARCM.ID AREA OPEN SPACE (AC) (AC) RESIDENTIAL NII-1 S;8 8„ ,9.02 NII-1 39.1 8% 313 NII-3 uqq 8% 239 NIi-4 ft+Y 8% 071 VII-5 IG5 8% 1.52 NH-O 21.1 8'% 1.90 NII-9 30.3 8% 2.12 MI'-I 31.c 8% 3.00 COMMERCIAL&MIXED USE COMM-I 4bY s% '190 COMM 25.1 8% un 2. MU-I 85.3 8% 3.62 g�MO-4 3ti6 Y�.� 8% 2.93 OPEN SPACE TRACT A I 1002,• '1'I2AC"E 13 ., l00% 5 "1111 C"E C .5� 100'% 5.0 TRACT D 39 100% 2 40 POND IP' -I.5 0% 'ERACI'I-: 10.,3 100% 205 I RACP l' 18 100% 2.8 'GRACE O 11-I 100% II.] TRACT 11 3 1 I 00% 5.1 'I'12AC I'1 16 100% 3.1 POND C. -15 0% TRACE.! 8.3 100% 8.3 "1'INC'I R I .9 100% POND 0* -39 0% "(SAC1'1. 1.9.9 100% 13.9 IrRIETS.8 'Ste }iFR r TOTAL OPEN SPACE 130.58 "I'HE POND AREAS I IAVE NOT ADEN INCLUDED AS OPEN SPACE • • 6.11 Environmental considerations The proposed Site does not appear to inhabit any endangered species or show obvious signs of inhabitance. It also appears that the Site is not subject to any existing wetlands. An environmental assessment entitled, General Ecological Resources Survey, High Point at Mead Annexation has been prepared by Western Environment and Ecology, Inc. The report prepared for the applicant (CH2M HILL) is dated March 6, 2008 and is included with the petition for annexation. 6.12 Economic Development Potential The economic development opportunities attributable to this development include: • Business and job creation-The development has the potential of 535,000 square feet of commercial space for new business and job opportunities. • Customer base expansion that will support local businesses -The project will create an estimated 1,436 new residential units at full buildout to support local business • Revenue generation associated with new construction and development-The town of Mead will benefit from typical municipal revenues associated with development activity. See fiscal analysis for more detail. • • MouNrq," MOUNTAIN VIEW FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT r I E Administrative Office: R I`_r� 9119 County Line Road •Longmont, CO 8O5O1 • E i4i% F (303) 772-0710 • FAX (303) 651-7702 VIEW March 3,2008 Mr. BrettSchlanger CH2M Hill 9191 South Jasmaica Street Denver, CO 80112 Dear Mr.Schlanger, Thank you for your inquiry concerning the fire protection coverage for the property your group intends to develop in unincorporated Weld County. Mountain View Fire District has an intergovernmental agreement with the town of Mead to provide all fire protection services with the incorporated city limits. That means that wherever the town goes, we go, basically. Assuming your plans continue to annex into Mead, Mountain View will be your service provider, and we will pursue the exclusion/inclusion process. If that were not to materialize, service to the area would be split between us and Johnstown along the current lines. Certainly, the fire district supports your petition to the Town • of Mead and wishes you success. Your group may be interested to know that in our five-year plan, Mountain View intends to build a station in the area around and east of Highway 66 and 125. The station will not only provide a better response time to the immediate area, but will also supply a redundancy factor for Mead in the event of simultaneous calls for service. Also,we believe that by adding resources to the area, Mead's Insurances Services Office rating should improve and may result in lower homeowner's and business insurance, providing the Town with a competitive advantage when attracting businesses and home buyers. As your plans develop, I anticipate that you will be working closely with our Fire Marshal, LuAnn Penfold. We :oak forward to providing you with excellent customer service. At Mv, ow Mission is to "Lead our communities in risk reduction activities,while maintaining an efficient and effective safety net of emergency response." Please let me know if I may provide further information or be of service to you. Sincerely, iN i y Randy Templeton, Fire Chief Mountain View Fire District • Xc: Dan Dean, Town of Mead Station 1 Station 2 Station 3 Station 4 Station 5 Station 6 Station 7 9119 Cnty Line Rd. 14308 Mead St.,Unit B P.O.Box 575 P.O.Box I1 10911 Dobbin Run 50 Bonanza Dr. P.O.Box 40 Longmont,CO Longmont,CO 299 Palmer Ave. 8500 Niwot Road Lafayette,CO Erie,CO 100 So.Forest St. 80501 80504 mead,CO 80542 Niwot,CO 60544 80026 80516 Dacono,CO 80514 2/28/2008 • Qwest -at • Bart Garner Q W e s c t. Field Engineer • Spirit of Service' RE: CH2MHILL Avex Group • And Brett Schlanger This is a will serve letter Avex Crroup/Douthit. Qwest will provide service. The general area is East of 1 25 and west of cr 11 Between county mad 38 and 40. About 585 Acres. This is planned to be Annexed by the town of Mead. Qwest requests plans to be submitted to allow Time for engineering and construction to take place on a reasonable schedule. • Bart Garner Field Engineer Qwest Communications • 303 255 6122 • , ` Town of Mead /WIII1► ead PC Box 626 • Third Cd Street Mead, Colorado 80542-0626 Mead-"A Little Town (970)535-4477 Office wan a Big Future" (970)535-0831 Fax • May 14, 2008 • HD Path Growth Partners, LTD 5963 Dallas Parkway Suite 200A Plano, Texas 75093 RE: Town of Mead -Sanitary Sewer Services -"Will Serve" Letter Gentlemen: The Town of Mead is aware that you are a proponent/petitioner for creation of the E I-25 Sanitation District proposal that is presently pending before the Weld County Board of County Commissioners. As you may know, the Town of Mead is the designated wastewater system operator for most of the property included within the boundaries of the proposed district "ultimate service area", pursuant to the Area Wide Water Quality Management Plan 2003 Update as adopted by the North Front Range Water Quality Planning Association ("NFRWQPA"). This designation was made pursuant to Section 208 of the Clean Water Act and the area for which Mead is designated is referred to as the Town of Mead 208 Service Area. As such, the Town of Mead is fully committed to planning for and providing sanitary • sewage collection and treatment within the Town of Mead 208 Service Area. For this reason, the Town adopted the Town of Mead WWTP Facilities Update dated February 4, 2005. This letter will confirm that the Town of Mead is able and willing to provide sanitary sewage collection and/or treatment services to your property within the Mead 208 Service Area when and as development approvals that cannot be served by septic systems are vested and development proceeds with respect to your property, and following receipt of approval from the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment to construct necessary facilities. This "Will Serve" commitment is subject to all of the requirements of the Town of Mead, including Mead's Land Use Code, General Municipal Code, Ordinances, Rules and Regulations, including but not limited to annexation of the subject property to the Town of Mead; compliance with the Town of Mead Comprehensive Plan; agreement to pay the cost of construction and installation of necessary sewer collection and transmission facilities into the-then existing Town of Mead wastewater treatment system; engineering approvals; and compliance with the Town's specifications for public improvements including connections and meters, etc. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Very truly yours, DOAPan J. /A-- Town Manager • • 6 Source Gas May 14, 2008 Brett Schlanger CHM2 - Hill. 9193 S. Jamaica Street Englewood, CO 80122 RE: High Point at Mead Dear Brett: In regard to your recent inquiry regarding the availability of natural gas to the proposed High Point at Mead,CO, SourceGas, LLC pipe lines can provide adequate supplies of natural gas for your present projected load demand. • It is the desire of SourceGas to serve new and existing developments in our service territories. As your project progresses, please allow us to provide your firm with any additional information as necessary. You may rely on us to provide you with exceptional utility service. If you need additional information or I can be of further help, please call me at (303) 833-3313 Ext. 24. Thank you for the opportunity to serve you, Joe Valdez Field Coordinator SourceGas, LLC Cc: Dan Pickett • 3766 Eureka Way Unit#1 Frederick, CO 80516 Northern Colorado Water Conservancy District 220 Water Avenue • Berthoud CO 80513 • 970.5327700 • fax 970-532 0942 • March 6, 2008 Mr. Brett Schlanger CH2M HILL 9193 South Jamaica Street Denver, CO 80112 Dear Mr. Schlanger: As requested, this letter will confirm that lands owned by the Avex Group located in the N%2 of Section 2, Township 3 North, Range 68 West and in S''/2 of Section 26 and a portion of Section 35, Township 4 North, Range 68 West are located within the boundaries of the Northern Colorado Water Conservancy District. If you have any questions, please feel free to call me at 970-622-2216 • Sincerely, Marilyn L. Conley Allotment Contracts Manager 1p • SNIT-_0 • POWER Your Touchstone Energy'Partner in April 1, 2008 Mr. Brett Schlanger CH2M Hill 9191 South Jamaica Street Denver, CO 80112 Dear Mr. Schlanger: United Power is the provider of electric service in the area to the proposed Douthit Annexation of approximately 585 acres, located east of Interstate-25, north of Weld County Road 38 (WCR 38) and bound by WCR 11 to the east and WCR 40 to the north. The electrical distribution in the • area may need to be upgraded depending on the requirements of the site and in providing capacity and safe reliable power to the area. Service will be provided according to the rules, regulations, and policies in effect by United Power at the time service is requested. We look forward to this opportunity to provide electric service. If you have any questions, please give me a call at 303-637-1336. Sincerely, )1, //t1/7 Morlica L. Hansen District Representative • UNITED POWER,INC. PO BOX 929 • Brighton,CO 80601 303-659-0551 • 800-468-8809 • fax 303-659-2172 www.unitedpower.com • departure from the existing Land Use Plan is by adding a multifamily residential parcel that is centrally located to the Mixed Use and Commercial parcels. Within mixed use developments such as High Point at Mead, it is common to plan higher density uses adjacent to mixed use, commercial and retail uses in order to encourage a live, work, play atmosphere. We are requesting an amendment to the Town of Mead's Comprehensive Plan dated September 27, 2004 to include commercial and multi family residential adjacent to CR 9.5 as depicted. One of the goals of the Site has been to promote growth within the development and region and by substantially following the Town's Comprehensive Plan will enable and maintain continuity between future developments and thus help support the desired growth within the region. 7.4 Land Use Code The proposed Plan is generally consistent with the Land Use Code, including street requirements, off street parking requirements, parks and open space, environmentally restricted land, bike and pedestrian ways and historical structure standards. Additional standards will be proposed with the submittal of a PUD after annexation approval. 7.5 Existing and Adjacent land Use The existing land use of High Point at Mead primarily consists of agricultural land. The Site • is encumbered with oil and gas appurtenances which generally consist of storage tanks and wells. A portion of the property is also traversed by the Farmer's Extension Ditch, owned and operated by the Farmer's Reservoir Irrigation Company (FRICO). Adjacent land primarily consists of very low density residential housing surrounded by agricultural land. At this time, no development is slatted for any adjacent property. The Town of Mead Land Use Plan depicts similar land uses to High Point at Mead directly south of the Site and low residential development to the east. Overall the proposed land use plan for High Point at Mead is in conformance with the Town of Mead Land Use Plan and will be compatible with future development throughout the region. • • Development Compatibility Statements General Site Location and Description The High Point at Mead (Site) is located in unincorporated Weld County, at the northeast corner of Interstate-25 (I-25) and County Road 38 (CR 38) and bound by future CR 11 to the east and future CR 40 to the north. The property contains a portion of the south half of Section 26 and a portion of Section 35,Township 4 North, Range 68 West,6114 P.M. as well as a portion of the north half of Section 2, Township 3 North, Range 68 West, 6m P.M. The 595 acre development will consist of single family and multi-family residential, commercial, open space and mixed use development. 7.1 Street Master Plan The primary point of access for the proposed development will be CR 38. Construction improvements for CR 38 will be incorporated with the development of the Site and shall take into account future expansion. It is understood that the developer will work in conformance with the Town of Mead Planning Department to design a street section that will allow for future improvements with minimal demolition. The proposed internal roadway design has been based on the Weld County Code. If necessary the applicant will contact CDOT for permission to work in the I-25 right of way. A preliminary traffic report has been included with the petition for annexation. • 7.2 Subdivision Plan The overall vision for the High Point at Mead represents an opportunity to create an integrated pattern of land uses and development to be defined further in a subsequent PUD submittal after annexation approval. Identifiable neighborhoods will be created by allowing a variety of housing types including, but not limited to attached and detached single family housing, multi-family apartment/condos, and active adult lifestyle housing. A Commercial and Mixed Use Component will allow residents neighborhood shopping and employment opportunities. A pedestrian friendly network of trails linking public spaces, neighborhoods, parks, and open space promotes connectivity. The development will embrace the site's conditions including views and topography as the basis for the design of parks and open space, drainage systems and neighborhood street patterns. Quality architectural styling and construction will ensure the design meets the overall scale and character desired in Mead. 7.3 Comprehensive Plan The High Point at Mead Site has been designed in conformance with the Town of Mead Standard Design Criteria and Construction Requirements. The land uses shown on the Concept Map have been designed to be substantially in conformance with the Town of Mead Land Use Plan as created by JR Engineering, September 2004. Where the land use plan differs from the Town of Meads Comprehensive plan is by adding a commercial parcel adjacent to County Road 9.5. County Road 9.5 has been determined by the Town to be a • future Arterial and a logical placement of the commercial/retail parcel beginning at the intersection of County Road 38 and County Road 9.5 and moving north. The second • High Point at Mead Preliminary Drainage Report Mead, Colorado Prepared for: • HD Path of Growth Partners, Ltd. & 1-25 and 389 Partners, Ltd. 5953 Dallas Parkway, Suite 200-A Plano, TX 75093 Prepared by: CH2M HILL, Inc. 9191 South Jamaica Street Englewood, CO 80112-5946 CH2MHILL Project No. 368816 CH2MHILL s Submittal Date: May, 2008 Resubmitted Date: July, 2008 • • DRAINAGE REPORT AND PLAN ACKNOWLDGEMENT This report and plan for the preliminary drainage design of High Point at Mead was prepared by me or under my direct supervision in accordance with the provisions of the Town of Mead Standards for the owners thereof. I understand that the Town of Mead does not and will not assume liability for drainage facilities designed by others. Joshua S. Ho er Registered P ofession Engineer State of Colorado/17 39335 Date 1 7 f013 For and on behalf of CH2M HILL • • High Point at Mead Preliminary Drainage Report i • Table of Contents I. General Site Location and Description 1 II. Purpose 1 III. Existing Conditions 2 IV. Design Criteria 2 V. Soil Classification 3 VI. Historic Drainage Basins 3 VII. Proposed Drainage Basins 5 VIII. Detention Facility 7 IX. Conclusion 7 X. References 8 Appendices Appendix A-Maps,Tables &Figures • Appendix B-Hydrologic/Hydraulic Calculations and Tables Appendix C-Historic CUHP Input&Output Appendix D-Historic &Proposed Drainage Area Maps • High Point at Mead Preliminary Drainage Report ii • I. General Site Location and Description High Point at Mead(Site) is located in unincorporated Weld County,at the northeast corner of Interstate-25 (I-25) and County Road 38 (CR 38). The Site is bound by future CR 11 to the east and future CR 40 to the north. The Site is located in a portion of Section 35,Township 4 North and Range 68 West of the 6th Principal Meridian in the County of Weld,State of Colorado. The following report has been conducted as a requirement of the petition for annexation to the Town of Mead. The 595 acre Site will consist of single family and multi-family residential,commercial, mixed use development as well as parks and open space. The High Point at Mead development is designed to establish growth in an attractive community within the Town of Mead. The proposed land use plan and engineering have been designed to reflect the Town of Mead Comprehensive Plan and other land use regulations within the Town. STATE HWY 56 COUNTY ROAD 44 n COUNTY ROAD 40 • I I COUNTY ROAD 3E i COUNTY ROAD 34 gn 3 HWY 66 VICINITY MAP II. Purpose The intent of this report is to provide a preliminary storm drainage study for the Site addressing existing and proposed drainage characteristics. The future improvements and modifications to the Site will be minimized in order to reduce significant impacts to the surrounding hydrology. A final drainage report will be conducted upon approval of the • petition for annexation to the Town of Mead and prior to final design of the property. High Point at Mead Preliminary Drainage Report 1 • III. Existing Conditions The High Point at Mead Site currently consists of undeveloped agricultural land. The existing topography consists of gentle slopes typically ranging from one to five percent. The existing Site contains multiple oil and gas appurtenances scattered throughout the property. The more dominant existing surface features consist of wells with various storage tanks which are all accessible by dirt roads traversing the Site. A small parcel of Section 35 located at the midpoint of the western property line is owned and maintained by the American Telephone and Telegraph Company (AT&T). The AT&T site has dedicated easements for communication systems that run through the High Point at Mead property. Other utilities running though the Site primarily consist of gas pipelines and communication system lines. The Farmers Extension Ditch which is owned and operated by the Farmers' Reservoir and Irrigation Company(FRICO) enters the property from the south approximately one quarter mile east of 1-25. The concrete lined ditch flows parallel along the north side of CR 38 and begins to meander north at the midpoint of Section 35. The ditch flows north for approximately one third mile before heading east off-site. Based on the existing topography it's believed that during a major storm event the ditch currently intercepts existing surface drainage. IV. Design Criteria • The hydrological calculations for the proposed development are based on the criteria set forth in the Urban Drainage Flood Control District Manual(UDFCD)per the Town of Mead Storm Drainage Design Criteria and Construction Standards. The historic rates were calculated using the Colorado Urban Hydrograph Procedure (CUHP 2005). The two year storm analysis was conducted for the minor event and the 100 year storm analysis was conducted for the major event. The ten year analysis was conducted in order to calculate the historic ten year discharge rate for the proposed detention ponds per the Town of Mead Storm Drainage Criteria. The five year storm event was also analyzed in order to further understand the drainage characteristics of the Site. The one hour rainfall data for each storm event analyzed was determined using the UDFCD Figures;RA-1,RA-3 and RA-6 located in Appendix A. The percentage imperviousness values listed in the UDFCD Table RO-3 were used to calculate runoff rates for the existing and proposed drainage basins. The surface characteristics for the existing Site primarily exhibit undeveloped agricultural surface features which yield an imperviousness of two percent. The percent imperviousness varies for the proposed basins and is based on a weighted average of the proposed land uses. The proposed values are based on Table RO-3 and the weighted values are included in Table 2,Summary of Proposed Basins located in Appendix B. The typical depression losses were assumed to be minor,thus the default values listed in the UCFCD Table RO-6 are utilized. The infiltration rate and decay coefficient for NRCS hydrologic soil Type C listed in the UDFCD Table RO-7 is analyzed for both the existing and proposed drainage basins. The spreadsheets exhibiting the • aforementioned CUHP design input parameters are located in Appendix C. High Point at Mead Preliminary Drainage Report 2 • The f EMA Flood Insurance Map (FIRM) for the proposed Site is located on Community Panel Number 080266 0725C,map revised September 28, 1982. There are no floodplains located within the boundaries of the proposed Site. The FIRM for the Site is located in Appendix A. The UDFCD Best Management Practices (BMP)methods used to prevent soil erosion and the occurrence of any sediment problems have been utilized throughout the design process. These methods and procedures will be carried out through the final design and construction of the Site. V. Soil Classification The NRCS soil survey for the proposed Site exhibits Type C hydrologic soil classification. The native soils consist primarily of Nunn clay loam and Wiley-Colby complex with small regions of Otero sandy loam throughout the Site. The characteristics of Type C soils typically include susceptibility to water and wind erosion while being highly expansive. VI. Historic Drainage Basins The existing topography of the Site is defined by a small ridge that bisects the north and south regions of the property. The ridge generally descends in an easterly direction towards the property line and naturally divides the Site into two separate watersheds. The overall • existing topography of the Site consists of gentle slopes typically ranging from one to five percent. Two distinct drainage paths exist in the north and southeast portion of the Site. The drainage path to the south of the ridge is well defined with side slopes reaching ten percent. The drainage way becomes concentrated toward the southeast and discharges off the property at the same location. The drainage path to the north has similar characteristics with side slopes reaching up to ten percent and becomes concentrated towards the northern property line,south of future CR 40. Flow is conveyed offsite at the northern most low point along future CR 40. Upon evaluation of the existing topography,four historic drainage basins have been delineated. The determination of the historic drainage basins is based on the existing contours and the natural drainage characteristics of the Site. Each of the historic basins release offsite at a separate design point which can be located on the Historic Drainage Basin Map located in the map pocket. Basin EX-1 The majority of runoff along the south side of the ridge is collected within Basin EX-1. The overland slopes typically range from one to five percent with an overall undeveloped basin imperviousness of two percent. The flow becomes concentrated as runoff gathers toward the southeast portion of the basin. Here, runoff is collected into a defined drainage path with side slopes reaching up to ten percent. The flow is conveyed offsite in a concentrated drainage path where it ultimately discharges to the St. Vrain Creek. The Farmers' Extension • Ditch bisects the basin but has not been evaluated to intercept any flow from upstream High Point at Mead Preliminary Drainage Report 3 • runoff. This decision is based on the preliminary analysis that no developed flow will be discharged into the irrigation ditch. Basin EX-2 The majority of runoff contributing to Basin EX-2 is generated east of the frontage road and south of the ridge bisecting the Site. The overland slopes typically range from one to five percent with an overall undeveloped basin imperviousness of two percent. Runoff generated within the basin collects along the north side of CR 38 and seemingly flows into FRICO Ditch. The assumption is made that the developed flow will not be allowed to discharge into the Ditch,therefore the point of release established for the basin is the existing 12" CMP culvert under CR 38. However, thick vegetation and debris have completely clogged the culvert and have caused flow to bypass the outfall and continue east in a roadside swale along the north side of CR 38. It is presumed that the existing culvert once served as the prime point of release for the basin and shall serve as a proposed point of release for the Site. A small amount of offsite flow via a 15"RCP culvert under the frontage road is conveyed south of the property line in a swale directed toward the 12"CMP. Due to the thick debris and vegetation,flow bypasses the outfall and continues east in a roadside swale. As stated earlier,flow from the roadside swale seemingly discharges into the FRICO Ditch. However,flow from the historic basin will not be assumed to release into the Ditch and will release at design point two (D.P. 2), as shown in the Historic Drainage Basin Map located in the map pocket. Flows during minor storm events are assumed to be contained within the roadside swale,while greater storm events will likely cause flow to overtop CR 38. • Basin EX-3 The small portion of runoff conveyed through Basin EX-3 is generated from the northeast quadrant of the Site. The overland slopes typically range from one to three percent with an overall undeveloped basin imperviousness of two percent. Runoff generated within the basin sheet flows easterly across the property line where it ultimately discharges into FRICO ditch. During major storm events it appears likely that runoff may overtop the ditch and flow into the Davis Reservoir. Basin EX-4 The majority of runoff along the north side of the ridge is collected within Basin Ex-4. The overland slopes typically range from one to five percent with an overall undeveloped basin imperviousness of two percent. The runoff becomes concentrated toward the northern portion of the basin in a defined drainage path with side slopes reaching up to ten percent. The flow is conveyed offsite under an existing dirt road (future CR 40)via two 24"CMP culverts where it ultimately discharges to the Little Thompson River. The existing culverts have been utilized in order to prevent the erosion of the existing dirt road. The existing culverts are not properly installed and may not be sized adequately to convey the major storm event. The confluence of the drainage path offsite and the Little Thompson River is approximately 1.75 miles north of the future CR 40 property line. • High Point at Mead Preliminary Drainage Report 4 • Table 1: Summary of Historic Basins BASIN WATERSHED DESIGN % Q2 Q5 Q10 Q1o° ACREAGE POINT IMPERVIOUSNESS EX-1 256.5 1 2% 0.63 68.8 108.7 361.2 EX-2 87.6 2 2% 0.20 21.9 34.7 116.0 EX-3 81.5 3 2% 0.30 30,6 48.3 152.2 EX-4 196.4 4 2% 0.65 70.8 109.9 355.2 TOTALS 622 - - 1.78 192.1 301.6 984.6 Basin OS-1 The existing 15"RCP culvert under the frontage road at the southwest corner of the Site does not release directly onto the Site. The culvert outfall is located south of the property line and assumed to outfall through the existing 12" CMP culvert under CR 38. However,the excessive vegetation and debris clogging the 12"CMP has caused flow to bypass the outfall and continue east via the roadside swale. Future development of the Site will utilize the location of the existing 12"CMP culvert. Therefore the basin boundaries have been determined in order to assure the culvert is properly sized. The basin area is defined west of the frontage road and contains an area approximately 200 feet west from the mouth of the culvert and spans approximately 600 feet north creating a triangular shape with the frontage road. Similar to EX-2 it is likely that flow during a minor storm event will be contained within the roadside swale,while greater storm events will likely cause flow to overtop CR • 38. Basin OS-1 will be further analyzed in a final design report once the frontage road is removed. VII. Proposed Drainage Basins In order to maintain and emulate the natural drainage patterns of the Site the proposed drainage basin boundaries and points of release have been designed to closely reflect the historic conditions. The proposed roadway network and existing contours outline the limits of the proposed basins that primarily reflect the existing historic basin boundaries. The percent impervious values are based on the proposed land use plan and conform to the UDFCD criteria set forth in Table RO-3. A weighted average of the land use within each basin was used to determine the appropriate imperviousness. The imperviousness values are included in the Proposed Drainage Area Map located in the map pocket. Each proposed basin will release offsite at a relative location to the historic basins. The outfall and detention facilities utilized are further discussed in the later sections of the report. Basin PR-1 The proposed basin is delineated as the contributing watershed to Pond A,totaling 285 acres. The majority of the basin will be primarily composed of single family residential and commercial land uses with open space tracts scattered throughout. A small acreage of multi- family residential falls within the basin boundary and is utilized in the determination of the overall basin imperviousness. The weighted average results in an overall basin • imperviousness of 62 percent. The proposed drainage patterns and the location of Pond A High Point at Mead Preliminary Drainage Report 5 • are designed to reflect the existing topography. The inflow rates,volume and release rates for Pond A are included in Table 3, Summary of Ponds located in Appendix B. Basin PR-2 The proposed basin is delineated as the contributing watershed to Pond D,totaling 56 acres. The majority of the basin will be primarily composed of mixed use development with an open space tract to the south. A small portion of the AT&T parcel to the north has been included into the overall basin acreage. The percent imperviousness is based on a weighted average of the land use and results in an overall basin imperviousness of 83 percent. The proposed drainage patterns and the location of Pond B are designed to reflect the existing topography. The inflow rates,volume and release rates for Pond B are included in Table 3, Summary of Ponds located in Appendix B. Basin PR-3 The proposed basin is delineated as the contributing watershed to Pond C,totaling 80 acres. The majority of the basin will be primarily composed of single family residential with open space tracts scattered throughout. The percent imperviousness is based on a weighted average of the land use and results in an overall basin imperviousness of 60 percent. The proposed drainage patterns and the location of Pond C are designed to reflect the existing topography. The inflow rates,volume and release rates for Pond C are included in Table 3, Summary of Ponds located in Appendix B. Basin PR-4 • The proposed basin is delineated as the contributing watershed to Pond D,totaling 197 acres. The basin land use is composed of single family and multi-family residential and mixed use development with open space tracts scattered throughout. A small portion of the AT&T parcel to the south has been included into the overall basin acreage. The percent imperviousness is based on a weighted average of the land use and results in an overall basin imperviousness of 60 percent. The proposed drainage patterns and the location of Pond B are designed to reflect the existing topography. The inflow rates,volume and release rates for Pond D are included in Table 3, Summary of Ponds located in Appendix B. Table 2: Summary of Proposed Basins WATERSHED DESIGN % TIME OF BASIN ACREAGE CONCENTRATION O+o Qioo (ac) POINT IMPERVIOUSNESS (min) (cfs) (cfs) PR-1 284.7 1 62% 37 636 1287 PR-2 56.4 2 83% 26 243 437 PR-3 80.2 3 60% 40 190 388 PR-4 196.5 4 60% 43 388 797 TOTALS 617.8 - - - 1457 2909 • High Point at Mead Preliminary Drainage Report 6 • VIII. Detention Facility The proposed development of the Site incorporates the use of four detention facilities to maintain the natural drainage patterns surrounding the Site and maintain historic flow rates. Each pond is preliminarily sized using the FAA Detention Method set forth in the UDFCD. Although the use of the FAA method is discouraged with basin sizes greater than 160 acres it was determined to be an adequate design calculation for the preliminary analysis. The detention ponds were sized based on the 10-year historic release rates calculated using CUHP. The final drainage report will provide a full analysis of the detention facilities within the Site using Storm Water Management Model(SWMM). Each pond will also be designed with a water quality capture volume (WQCV) and outfall structure using the criteria set forth in the UDFCD per the Town of Mead Storm Drainage Design Criteria and Construction Standards. Table 3: Summary of Ponds WATERSHED DESIGN VOL VOL POND ACREAGE POINT 5 YR 10 YR (ac) (ac-ft) (ac-ft) POND A 284,7 1 10.96 38.16 POND B 56.4 2 294 8.18 POND C 80.2 3 1.99 8.23 POND D 196.5 4 5.08 20.88 • TOTALS 617.8 IX. Conclusion The existing drainage patterns for High Point at Mead have been studied and incorporated into the design of the proposed development. The design calculations and improvements included with the Preliminary Drainage Report have been in conformance with UDFCD and the Town of Mead. The preliminary analysis has determined that the Site is not located within any floodplains and that no offsite flow will impact the Site. The Preliminary Drainage Report analyzed the proposed drainage basins under the assumption that no runoff will be allowed to discharge into FRICO ditch. Further design of High Point at Mead will assure that little or no runoff enters the ditch. The proposed design has incorporated the use of detention facilities to assure downstream properties will not be negatively impacted. The Preliminary Drainage Report has been prepared as part of the petition for annexation into the Town of Mead. Upon approval of the annexation a final drainage report will be completed taking into account all considerations from the Town of Mead. • High Point at Mead Preliminary Drainage Report 7 • X. References 1. Town of Mead Storm Drainage Criteria and Construction Standards,January 1998. Vol. 2 of 2. 2. Urban Storm Drainage Criteria Manual;Urban Drainage and Flood Control District, (revised 2004). 3. Federal Emergency Management Agency Flood Insurance Rate Map;Weld County, Colorado,Panel Number 725 of 1075,Map Number 080266 0725 C, Sept. 28, 1982. 4. Soil Map-Weld County,Colorado,Southern Part;Web Soil Survey 2.0 National Cooperative Soil Survey,Natural Resources Conservation Service,April 2008. 5. Town of Mead Land Use Plan.JR Engineering, September 2004. • • High Point at Mead Preliminary Drainage Report 8 • APPENDIX A Maps, Tables &Figures • • YW c i I4 w apomE OgLL '4:4-O V— CI L C d w at<..> N CU \ ONo13 N 05 !d 2 co co 1A W O a ••o m gi i W O i =^ h - u5�2 `O Q Z O CO J ix 1 tal t = �` W n W UZI t0 IX � ah"$ a et QC mut >4 414 F �' N d L '^ Cel S = HW a 10.I o^ do � � el E SE" B o e N .�i FI O_W Col)! o La Sa°" � r X I = 4048 ^_ Ca _1. LIJ Li iro o' o W 0 m a8272:5 s ra' Ce O �O\ �O\ Ww w mFa6 to i I s �✓ ' V aw $ `o�Eu Q. 1 Z L` W 6 o�'u „TE TOO OLLa r 2.F E maEa "- 3`o 1a 7 ro ,_,IF \ d O H C I a en" s- ---r � y .f/." ti m o _III I —'� U/ m \II fc\..__, — I I I O if r I III m vim N II O " NC 'III II II II NC/ II o it I \ JI j // li Si 0 CI \ 57-- NN V \ I ,\ __ 4,„0, 9'°s \n ,\L 1 `mil \ • 0098566 OOf9904 000:560 OOLL506 0061944 OOLL544 0089966 c0 01 O O CV r ,!AA ‘ '' '% wt 0) • Jkl a q o C' a. 8 in �I J IF • t c`(y 1 0 LI ✓ m co N G N'0 53 >4.047)< ' lia II o 3t Go i E, too ft r . a , 1\ Fl loth VE lit1 IT 11 . 0 7 kn TTT 4*Yh .3,� ..— 6460 -8 - N y 6•I M4 fji.. .. 0 0 Ii: • .. - Y $ v ,' n. g zQ ZV 0098564 OOfBSbb 0008566 0011540 0041560 00LLS66 0099546 �'' • f a` / CV ` 80 0 |� ® to Zit !. ! E ! 2- y \r{ ) § \ ! , "/| Q $ ({ ] § m - !!Z M 2 §■ ®lo 52 ! )k )� § ■« § ° IL. to r/\ - cc / E/ k � ! + !l !! G % 22 ! | ! a :f! , » �! $ f !f4 22 [k®a 2§jfl « | !{| is 0 ® I§)! | ! k§ - !/I2 . ° - . ! | ) f! ■ #!f! OM '5§i i& , E ® cam° ; to E !! {r $«e /! a: ) ! B„ 0 2 0c . r7 a {2 ) E ! Q S ! E. 3 | . 713 $� co 0- - a. o. 55 2E ii / k1 - , | 2 ! ! | ! ' f : ! ] ® Cl) f ; ! ! ! l22 ; � � a = f . | ! . s 2 - - , 10 •a0Og2 - /0. | O1 | ! | ! \ . ! -I .0. II 2 { 2 | E \ � � ! , \ � ) . z a - 2 ! ! � , � 0_ , _ .E0 " it ; ! ' f | | { ! ! | % # ! % | ; ! f | ! o0 � ! ; -3 W000CD_I_i cc to C . » ex • x , d4 *< © ® > + wi , al . o a. �k } ° . - ` |O q • Soil Map—Weld County,Colorado,Southern Part Town of Mead Annexation • Map Unit Legend Weld County,Colorado,Southern Part(CO618} Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres In AOI Percent of AOI 17 Colby loam,5 to 9 percent 16.4 2.5% slopes 42 Nunn day loam, 1 to 3 percent 360.8 54.3% slopes 53 Otero sandy loam,5 to 9 32.9 5.0% percent slopes 82 Wiley-Colby complex,1 to 3 19.5 2.9% percent slopes 83 Wiley-Colby complex,3 to 5 231.0 34.8% percent slopes 84 Playas 3.4 0.5% Totals for Area of Interest(AOI) 663.9 100.0% • • USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 2.0 4/9/2008 �� Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 3 DRAINAGE CRITERIA MANUAL (V. 1) RAINFALL • R 71 W O. 5 R 70 W R 69 W R 68 W R 67 W R 66 W R 65 W R 64 W R 63 W 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.0 0.95 0.75 .85 1.04 1.04 0.95 1.0 / LONGM MT I • 0.95 I I o • IJ Z NLOT Irv0 I m 1 t WELD BRIGHT() • ADAMS wm En 0 2 O 0 �r CR BOWER .E IR RI o 1 4 a DENVER F /• X 0.97 ADAMS VEf 0.99 F-• FI X RGRE N - • V4 m En ES 1.i IL CC/ A'P PAHOE / \ ARAPAHOE F Dr GLAS 'LBERT CONIFER .✓+1 1 D • R Ft '� W r PAR E o • g ij 72 to =w r Qm ` • 7- SEDALIA 1.05 0.95 X 0.99 w 0. 5 0.8 1.0 0.95 PRANHT'WN 1.0 0.85 0.95 R 71 W R 70 W R 69 W 5 g R 68 W R 67 W R 66 W R 65 W R 64 W R 63 W Figure RA-1—Rainfall Depth-Duration-Frequency: 2-Year, 1-Hour Rainfall • Rev. 01/2004 RA-13 Urban Drainage and Flood Control District RAINFALL DRAINAGE CRITERIA MANUAL (V. 1) • R 71 W R 70 W R 69 W R 63 UI i R 67 W R 66 N' R 65 W R 64 W R 63 W 1.3 1.4 1.45 1.45 1.4 1.35 1.35 1.4 I I LCNGMONi in \_,N4.._, c' NiWOT z I �n 3 I z ~ i t 1.2 WEI BRIGHT•, • ADA S — 0 ct F VrI BO 4IJ ~ ui w o / DENVER tB5• 1.1 ` 1.37 rl X 1. ADAMS E-N'Ln '. / ` D .vER 39 ARAPAHOE H- H. :.. )-1) • i.D ERG EEN —` (Va4 \ ! I ,.4 Lo C w� A GLAS ARAPAHOE T t O• GLA6 ELBERT ONIFER • 1ui 0o PAR ERci co G. • gtt F ow • SEDALIA X 7.39 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 FRANKT•W 1.4 1.4 R 71 W R 7D W R 69 W R 68 W R 67 W R 66 W R 65 W R 64 W R 63 W Figure RA-2—Rainfall Depth-Duration-Frequency: 5-Year, 1-Hour Rainfall • RA-14 01/2004 Urban Drainage and Flood Control District DRAINAGE CRITERIA MANUAL (V. 1) RAINFALL • R 71 W R 70 W R 69 W R 68 W R 67 W R 56 W R 65 W 6 64 W R 63 W 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.75 1.75 1 7 1.65 1.6 1.6 1.65 LOYCMONi \ n z ' Z `— IjI I IWOT I F II • se tEi ? co 0o '551 I ( I WEL' 1.4 BRIGHTO ADA S cf, En I BOiLDER I EF ERSON � ,- , o� � ' tn DENVER r 1 in • flt ADAMS un \ ARAPAHOE cE N 13 EVE• REEN C ' 1.65 0 1 55 1 al alp A';PAHD ARAPAHOE CONIFER 0• GIPS ELBERT Lt oo PAR ER ¢•0 S m , D g- • H. i- 1.3 1.4 1.5 I / . N \ 1.65 1.7 1.65 1.7 R 71 W R 70 W R 59 W R 68 W R 67 W R 66 W R 65 W R 64 W R 63 W Figure RA-3—Rainfall Depth-Duration-Frequency: 10-Year, 1-Hour Rainfall • Rev. 01/2004 RA-15 Urban Drainage and Flood Control District RAINFALL DRAINAGE CRITERIA MANUAL (V. 1) • R 71 W R 70 W R 69 W R 60 W R 67 W R 66 W R 65 W R 64 W R 63 W 2.4 2.5 2.65 2.7 2.7 2.64 2.65 2.7 2.0 LONGMONL z• \ I = I W• fr , ��►r► o TT 2F3wq , e�HTO • DAMS ? / OY JF ER ON r o r , p Q 1 ENVER - Q J / � • r 2.2 a, II •��,�� ADAMS !kV' DVERARAPAHOE ch 2.1 2.1 2.7 • EVE EEN N ` •✓ 4a \ .-----'----.° 2.65 w¢ A'APAHOE ARAPAHOE 2.05 , 4 D GLAS ELBERT CONIFERS •r o PA ER Em w 'P,2.05SEDALIA : \\ 26 to ANK➢WN 2.5 R 71 W 2.1 R 70 W 2.15 2.2 R 69 2.3 .4 68 W R 67 W R 66•5 W R 65 W R 64 W R 63 W Figure RA-6—Rainfall Depth-Duration-Frequency: 100-Year, 1-Hour Rainfall • RA-18 01/2004 Urban Drainage and Flood Control District DRAINAGE CRITERIA MANUAL (V. 1) RUNOFF • Table RO-3—Recommended Percentage Imperviousness Values Land Use or Percentage Surface Characteristics Imperviousness Business: Commercial areas 95 Neighborhood areas 85 Residential: Single-family Multi-unit(detached) 60 Multi-unit (attached) 75 Half-acre lot or larger Apartments 80 Industrial: Light areas 80 Heavy areas 90 Parks, cemeteries 5 Playgrounds 10 Schools 50 Railroad yard areas 15 • Undeveloped Areas: Historic flow analysis 2 Greenbelts, agricultural 2 Off-site flow analysis 45 (when land use not defined) Streets: Paved 100 Gravel (packed) 40 Drive and walks 90 Roofs 90 Lawns, sandy soil 0 Lawns, clayey soil 0 `See Figures RO-3 through RO-5 for percentage imperviousness. CA =K + (1.31i' -1.4412 + 1.135i- 0.12)for CA ≥0, otherwise CA =0 (RO-6) CCD =KCD + (0.858i' -0.786i2 + 0.774i+ 0.04) (RO-7) /Ca = (CA + CCD)/2 • 2007-01 RO-9 Urban Drainage and Flood Control District RUNOFF DRAINAGE CRITERIA MANUAL (V. 1) • in Figure RO-A6 in Appendix A at the end of this chapter. 3.2.2 Depression Losses Rainwater that is collected and held in small depressions and does not become part of the general surface runoff is called depression loss. Most of this water eventually infiltrates or is evaporated. Depression losses also include water intercepted by trees, bushes, other vegetation, and all other surfaces. The CUHP method requires numerical values of depression loss as inputs to calculate the effective rainfall. Table RO-6 can be used as a guide in estimating the amount of depression (retention) losses to be used with CUHP. Table RO-6—Typical Depression Losses for Various Land Covers (All Values in Inches. For use with the CUHP Method) Land Cover Range in Depression (Retention) Losses Recommended Impervious: Large paved areas 0.05- 0.15 0.1 Roofs-flat 0.1 - 0.3 0.1 Roofs-sloped 0.05-0.1 0.05 Pervious: Lawn grass 0.2 -0.5 0.35 • Wooded areas and open fields 0.2-0.6 0.4 When an area is analyzed for depression losses, the pervious and impervious loss values for all parts of the watershed must be considered and accumulated in proportion to the percent of aerial coverage for each type of surface. 3.2.3 Infiltration The flow of water into the soil surface is called infiltration. In urban hydrology much of the infiltration occurs on areas covered with grass. Urbanization can increase or decrease the total amount of infiltration. Soil type is the most important factor in determining the infiltration rate. When the soil has a large percentage of well-graded fines, the infiltration rate is low. In some cases of extremely tight soil, there may be, from a practical standpoint, essentially no infiltration. If the soil has several layers or horizons, the least permeable layer near the surface will control the maximum infiltration rate. The soil cover also plays an important role in determining the infiltration rate. Vegetation, lawn grass in particular, tends to increase infiltration by loosening the soil near the surface. Other factors affecting infiltration rates include slope of land,temperature, quality of water, age of lawn and soil compaction. As rainfall continues, the infiltration rate decreases. When rainfall occurs on an area that has little antecedent moisture and the ground is dry, the infiltration rate is much higher than it is with high RO-20 2007-01 Urban Drainage and Flood Control District RUNOFF DRAINAGE CRITERIA MANUAL (V. 1)III Table RO-7—Recommended Horton's Equation Parameters NRCS Hydrologic Infiltration (inches per hour) Decay Soil Group Initial—f, Final fo Coefficient—a A 5.0 1.0 0.0007 B 4.5 0.6 0.0018 C 3.0 0.5 0.0018 D 3.0 0.5 0.0018 To calculate the maximum infiltration depths that may occur at each time increment, it is necessary to integrate Equation RO-8 and calculate the values for each time increment. Very little accuracy is lost if, instead of integrating Equation RO-8, the infiltration rate is calculated at the center of each time increment. This"central"value can then be multiplied by the unit time increment to estimate the infiltration depth. This was done for the four NRCS hydrologic soil groups, and the results are presented in Table RO-8. Although Tables RO-7 and RO-8 provide recommended values for various Horton equation parameters,these recommendations are being made specifically for the urbanized or urbanizing watersheds in the Denver metropolitan area and may not be valid in different meteorologic and climatic regions. Table RO-8—Incremental Infiltration Depths in Inches* el _ NRCS Hydrologic Soil Group Time in Minutes** A B C and D 5 0.384 0.298 0.201 _ 10 0.329 0.195 0.134 15 0.284 0.134 0.096 20 0.248 0.099 0.073 25 0.218 0.079 0.060 30 0.194 0.067 0.052 35 0.175 0.060 0.048 40 0.159 0.056 0.045 45 0.146 0.053 0.044 50 0.136 0.052 0.043 55 0.127 0.051 0.042 60 0.121 0.051 0.042 65 0.115 0.050 0.042 70 0.111 0.050 0.042 75 0.107 0.050 0.042 80 0.104 0.050 0.042 85 0.102 0.050 0.042 90 0.100 0.050 0.042 95 0.098 0.050 0.042 100 0.097 0.050 0.042 105 0.096 0.050 0.042 110 0.095 0.050 0.042 115 0.095 0.050 0.042 120 0.094 0.050 0.042 * Based on central value of each time increment in Horton's equation. III **Time at end of the time increment. RO-22 2007-01 Urban Drainage and Flood Control District DRAINAGE CRITERIA MANUAL (V. 1) RUNOFF • 90 15,000.sq.ft homesf 1 • 80 .01# 14,000 sq.ft.homes • 0' • 70 / 13,000 sq.ft homes 1. / • • I • 60 • n 3 / o • Z 50 / / • • • 12,000 sq.ft homes k, E Is.-- ea • / • a/ / / /I •« o40 � � a • . • " p° • .homes 30jJon ' 20 1 10 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 Single Family Dwelling Units per Acre Figure RO-3---Watershed Imperviousness, Single-Family Residential Ranch Style Houses • 2007-01 RO-15 Urban Drainage and Flood Control District • APPENDIX B Hydrologic/Hydraulic Calculations &Tables • • TABLE 1 : SUMMARY OF HISTORIC BASINS (CUHPAnalysis) BASIN WATERSHED DESIGN % qz qs O10 O100 ACREAGE POINT IMPERVIOUSNESS EX-1 256.5 1 2% 0.63 68.8 108.7 361.2 EX-2 87.6 2 2% 0.20 21.9 34.7 116.0 EX-3 81.5 3 2% 0.30 30.6 48.3 152.2 EX-4 196.4 4 2% 0.65 70.8 109.9 355.2 TOTALS 622 - - 1.78 192.1 301.6 984.6 • • 0 • TABLE 2 : SUMMARY OF PROPOSED BASINS WATERSHED DESIGN % TIME OF O O BASIN CONCENTRATION Ow goo ACREAGE (ac) POINT IMPERVIOUSNESS (cfs) (cfs) (min) PR-1 284.7 1 62% 37 636 1287 PR-2 56.4 2 83% 26 243 437 PR-3 80.2 3 60% 40 190 388 PR-4 196.5 4 60% 43 388 797 TOTALS 617.8 - - - 1457 2909 Ill 0 • TABLE 3 : SUMMARY OF PONDS WATERSHED DESIGN VOL VOL POND ACREAGE POINT 5 YR 10 YR (ac) (ac-ft) (ac-ft) POND A 284.7 1 10.96 38.16 POND B 56.4 2 2.94 8.18 POND C 80.2 3 1.99 8.23 POND D 196.5 4 5.08 20.88 TOTALS 617.8 - - - • 0 N m r CO c0 L1— U (O CO O 0 0 0 • 0 N N h 0 U c0 CO (n in O 0 0 6 z a) a) r-- v co (o s o 6 v co v v CD ¢ O O O O W 5 N N F U v O v <- < 0 0 0 0 F- Z co o a U cc xcc F ii a z r co O (n W W Z F- LC)`. M N V V W CO LL O ? O R' + Z d m - co z y Lo O N In O Z ] "' M N a V Q n Y U M H W ❑ I O N a ~WET) ^ C) 2 H < OF W ^ v co L0 co CO -J Z D a o N N ,- co e- In IC La K 2 0 OU ~ CO N al O V r co co Z W ~ v m • UE Z ~ v N m ce). Ce)J Z `o Q Z w a o Co m m <O0 Z V > LL (Ni N N (Ni p LL _- W W d 0 ~Q d 2_ > 0 0 0 0 W R' 0 F o a O O O O J NNNN 2 J it LLI > H W 0 o a o {� 1- a 0 0 0 0 O o ^ o O O O (n N N N N I H co N- M h _Z LL t- LO 00 M CO co n o- w Z v V co (n in J ❑ N o N N O O zai m cci o6 w a o 0 0 0 > W 0 e LU IS h N (n N N N N _¢ ~ I ~ O O a O Co z Z it 0 0 0 0 0 3 = w -J CO 7 in N-- V cO"cr fn N c co o 0 co O 00 W 0 0 X N LL GO F CO W c) V N (0 o Q Ka ,,I, c0 O m O W ❑ W o ¢ N N m p 5 Y Z cp • cO o o '" a a a a ai 0 al CO c m LL DETENTION VOLUME BY THE MODIFIED FAA METHOD (See USDCM Volume 2 Storage Chapter for description of method) • Project: HIGH POINT AT MEAD-POND A Basin ID: PR-1 (For catchments less than 160 acres only. For larger catchments,use hydrograph routing method) Warning:This worksheet is not intended for catchments larger than 160 acres. r Determination of MINOR Detention Volume Using Modified FAA Method Determination of MAJOR Detention Volume Using Modified FAA Method -form_Design Information(Input): Design I Drainage Ilmpun: Catchment Drainage nage Area whess A- 84.70 percent Catchment Drainage Area Imperviousness A= 64.70 Percent Catchment oentNCO Area WoupNING-+ e= 284.]00 .-WARNING CatchmenPrndevlop ant NRCS e= 284]00 Pretleve!apmeol NRC5 Soil Gmup Type= L ACBSC,arO PmEevelopment SoilNRC6 Group Type= C ACBSC,orO Return Period for Detention Control T= 5 years(26,1025,50 or 100) Return Period for Detention Control T=) 100 (years t2,5,10,26,50,or 100) Time of Concentration of Watershed Tc= 37 MUMPS Tme of Concentration of Watershed Tc= 37 minutes Allowable Cart Release Rate q= 024 dslacre Allowable Unit Release Rate q= 038 cfslacre One-hour Premptlatlon P,= 135 inches One-hour Preciptallon P,= 2.65 Inches Design Rainfall IDF Formula i.C,Prl(CeTa.Ce Design Rainfall lop Formula i•Cr P,IICa°T.l"Cs Coefficient One Ca= 2050 Coefficient One CI= 20.50 Coefficient Two Cu' 10 Coefficient Two C,= 10 Coefficient Three Cs= O789 Coefficient Three Ca= 0.709 Determination of Average Outflow from the Basin(Calculated): Determination of Avenge Outflow from the Basin(Calculated): Runoff Coefficient C= 047 Runoff Coefficient Ca 0.64 Inflow Peak Runoff Op-in= 24641 ds Inflow Peek Runoff Op-in= 65063 ch Allowable Peak outflow Rate Op-out= 66004 cis Allowable Peak Outflow Rate op-out= 10819 cis Mod.FAA Minor Storage Volume• 477,494 cubic feet Mod.FAA Major Storage Volume• 1,662,285 cubic het Mod.FAA Minor Storage Volume• 10962 acre-ft Mad.FAA Major Storage Volume• 38.160 acre-ft 5 c Enter Rairloll Duration Incremental Increase Value Here le o.Slor 5-Minutes) Rainfall Rainfall !chow Adjustment Average Outflow Storage Rainfall Rainfall Inflow Adjustment Average Outlaw Storage Duration Intensity Volume Factor Outlaw Volume Volume Duration Intensity Volume Factor OlRnow Volume Volume mutes inches/hr cubic lee/ cis cable feet cubic feet minutes Inches l hr cubic feel ch cubic feel cubic feet (input) (output) (output) (output) (output) (output) (output) (input) (output) (output) (output) (output) (output) (output) 0 0.00 0 000 1100 0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 000 ! 0 0 5 450 I 102326 100 0604 20413 161813 s r 592 487,353 100 II 10819 I 32456 454,897 10 362 290605 —. 1.00 66804 40020 249778 10 I ]_11 776,776 100_ 1 10019 64,912 711666 15 304 366553] 100—� 6800 61 239 304208 15 698 1 0]]0]1 100 10019 8]38] 879,703 20 2 63 422,002 100 I 6809 01652 E 314,430 2D 5.16 j 1,128212 1.00 108.9 ! 129,823 800389 23332 25 46],101 100 I 88.09 102 W5 385,116 25 45] ! 1398]662 1.00 108.19 1622]9 1086083 30 2.09 I 504558 1.00 1804 122,478 382,080 30 4.11 I 13006669 1.00 108.19 194,]35 1153,934 35 191 5366412 141 08I 1.00 65.04 142891 ", 393521 35 a 3]5 1033814 100 108.19 u 22],191 1208,823 176 564 6556 15]384 406]5] 40 3.45 150]933 0 10426 250,234 1]57.899 ~ 45 163 1 5886603 0811 456207 167691 42162 45 320 16]3,533 09101 98.69 286,462 1,30],071 50 152 I 6106694 . 0 87 59.27 1]]]97 ^432e9] 50 I 299 I 1632, 08] 94,23 282690 I 13496]8 55 1.43 630651 089 56,97 188000 442648 55 200 i 16685]12712 ,I 084 90.58 298918 1386]94 • 60 35 1 84096 001 55.8 190210 050699 75 264 1734516 I 0.61 r 0]54 3f 5,146 10193]0 65 1,28 1 665,741 077 �. 5344 208,417 45]321 65 250 1]]9506 ] 079 849] 3313]4 1448,132 70 1]1 681358 077 52.05 H 219,623 462]35 70 238 _J 1821250 0.77 082 76 005 347.602 1.4]3,640 75 _.18 1_695929 0]6 5085 220 Bap 470554 ]5 227 1880198 0]5 I_ 0005 363630 1486,3660 00 ( 1.10 709591 072 0980 239038 470564 00 —1 217__t) 1896715 2 073 79.18 j 380057 1,516658 85 106 722454 0]2 J 486] 249243 473211 85 200I 1931088 I 0]2 7]]0 1 38,205 1534,813 102 7306611 071 4805_ 259459 i i- 52 4751662 90 2.00 (983,595 I 071 7639 412,513 1551,082 95 090 796100 070 I 9731 269656 4766465 95 192 1994411 070 7522 i 420,]41 1,5656]0 100 094 I 75]105 059 9664 2]0066247]243 100 185 4 2.023,721 I 069 74 16 j 444,969 15]6]52 105 091 l ]67563 068 I 9604 290669 47],994 105 1.79 _ 20516]3 I 0668 1 73.21 461,197 1,550,476 110 088 1 7]7560 0667 ' 4550 3002]575 4 J 7]285 110 173 -I 2078395 ( 06] I 7234 477,425 16009]0070 115 085 1 ]0]130 066 -4500 I 310482 475,657 115 1 6 2103998 I 066 71.54 7-493,653 i 1,610.345 120 080 ; ]06178 055 4412 rt 320689 475203 120 152 I 212821] I 0.65 7015 525109 126,108 130 078 5699 065 �- 43.73 340 101 474587 130 1.50 2172212-1 064 70.53 542,309 I 16822,106 140 _52!.. 361,514 456351 140 0 63 072 837851 , 063 i 4273 I 371721 463,071 145 140 2259751 0 63 66713 5]4022 1,647330 130 018 03698 061 43.73 341.101 4]250] 130 1.50 21]49921 060 6953 5923366 1832, 135 0.76 821920 0.64 43.37 351308 4]06613 135 149 2198969 064 688 558,5664 1638,404 912 195 0]2 83]55 052 4273 371,721 06503 145 141 2236]51_ O62 8].47 591.020 154],]30 150 0 70 844998 062 55 7.0] 62],476 16514851 160 O6] 059 0 08 233 O6 926 3021342340 460083 155 134 22]]961 062 as2 .1 667704 1 622476( 639_]04 1654,485 TTT 41.91 !- 16 31 2298]566 64 185 004 J- 8650 066 I4 01 87 41264] 453602 165 1.28 2 314 922 0661 6626 655932 1650990 170 064 I 726]8 061 4145 422,753 449925 170 1.26 2332693 i 061 1 65.90 672,160 16660404_ 1]5 463 0]913 56 1.23 032960 1]9 175 133 2399896 081 iii 66558 608300 1661510 100 06 51008 460 4103 943166 442258 180 120 23666]12 I_ 060 I 6624 704615 1662095 185 060 091550 060 1 4004 53373 1866 185 L 10 233109 i 060 6490 720843 1082265 180 059 I 67545 060 66 `- 473579 4339668 190 J 115 2399111 �i 0.60 6466 73]0]1 1601,040 195 051 903392 080 00.99 073705 429606 195 113 2414]38 080 6438 FE 753,299 1,661485 200 05] 909105 059 4033 483992 . 425,113 200 I 111 2,430,012 I 059 64.13 76952] 1600,405 205 056 914,693 0.59 40.18 - ._. _... ,_ _._._ __... 999198 10450 205 109 29448466 059 83.08 765,755 1659,191 210 055 920159 059 4003 1-"- 215 054 5170611 015900 210 l 10] 2479604 I 059 1 6343 811213 1665],654 835753 069 3976 ( 520811 400930 220 I 103 24]3070 I 468 1 63.43 014,411 1,656654 220 052 1 930851 050 I 3963 ; 535024 400935 220 y 103 1550]609 I 050 63.22 034 i 430 1853,438 225 0 52 940828 _ 050 I 39.53_ 545031 T 305697 225 ! 1.00 2611673 058 62.02 656,88'., 1648,172 230 151 "� 940928 058 r 3851 545231 395697 230 100 25t5073J 058 L 626 866,094,_._ J _..._ 1948,178 235 0 50 :. 905869 _ 058 3839 55543] 391032 235 098 266201 058 6263 003,122 145158 ! 950 240 049 ]10 058 3926 5665640 3850]4 240 0.97 2501242 I 0 I 62.45 099350 16 64162 245 049 955419 450 39.17 575,650 379,626 245 095 255396] 050 08 66220 915.578 1638389 —~ 250 048 `960155 05] 390] 1 56605] 3]4098 250 0,94 2566466 0 5 ~ 62.12 0316 1,634,660255 047 i, 964749 057 3119 596263 368486 255 l 093 2578746 i 0.5] I 6196 94803477 1630712 260 046 1 969265 05] 3888606.4705. --— —' 362 785 260 o so D S] 61.01 964.252 ! 1628.555 275 045 1 976073 057 38.70 I 6166]6 35]69 270 I 0.89 2612361 I 057 6163 990718. 1 1617143 270 044 1 9]890 057 38.70 1 836086 341291 270 ) 0.89 26N341 r 057 , 61.33 ,01,98 1,612,603 275 Odd 9823]0 15] 39,61 837,006 345201 275 087 2625840 0 5]"3 r6199 1012916 961296 280 044 T 986 6600 0 5 3853 6647,296 339304 200 0 68 263]154 05] r I— -- I 6I 36 1029,1]3 169980 205. 093 1 004606 057 36.35 ' 65]7021 333262 285 064 ~ 2848285 05]� 81.13 1005001 1502884 _ID 290 Oda T 994866 056 ( 30.4] -r66]]p5 32] 5] 290 .1 004 26659247 066 r 66101 H 10461,829 I 159],6104 295 042 998048 _ 056 3030 6671915 320991 295 (' 0.62 28]0049 ) 056 66090 1677957 1592,190 300 0 42 - 10688] OSfi 3023 666122 314]85 300 082 2600680 i 0.56 ? 60]0 1094085 I 1,586603 Mod.FAA Minor Storage Volume(cubic ft.)• 4]],494 Mod.FAA Major Storage Volume(cubic It). 1662265 Mod,FAA Minor Storage Volume(acre-fl.)= 169618 Mod.FAA Major Storage Volume 38.1800 UDFCD DETENTION VOLUME ESTIMATING WORKBOOK Version 2.03a,Released March 2000 POND A xis,Modified FAA 6/25/2009 12.02 PM P DETENTION VOLUME BY THE MODIFIED FAA METHOD (See(1SOCM Volume 2 Storage Chapter(or description of method) • Project: HIGH POINT AT MEAD-POND A Basin ID: PR-1 Inflow and Outflow Volumes vs.Rainfall Duration 3,000,000 -- • • • : ! I i : 2,500,000 • . I. . . , . . . . . . 2,000,000 + I . .• • Sr 1,500,000 ,r • • [ .• . , I • • 1.000,000 • : • o o s 0 . i.- :.. -- I • 500.000 Cp0o0000000oo-oor'_^ .oOO000r.000000e000 O:OO.O:0010.1.0000 ': - -.: :::: .- • • 0 - I r I 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 Duration(Minutes) - Minor Storm tallow Volume — Minor Storm Outflow Volume 0 Minor Storm Storage Volume ♦—Major Storm Inflow Volume (Major Storm Outflow Volume • Major Storm Storage Volume I • UOFCD DETENTION VOLUME ESTIMATING WORKBOOK Version 2.03a,Released March 2008 POND A xis.Mod.fied FAA 6/25/200e,12 02 PM DETENTION VOLUME BY THE MODIFIED FAA METHOD 5,l — (See USDCM Volume 2 Storage Chapter for descnption of method) SProject: HIGH POINT AT MEAD-POND B Basin ID: PR-2 (For catchments less than 160 acres only. For larger catchments,use hydrograph routing method) (NOTE:for catchments larger than 90 acres,CUHP hydrograph and routing are recommended) Determination of MINOR Detention Volume Using Modified FAA Method Determination of MAJOR Detention Volume Using Modified FAA Method Design Information(Input): -I Design Information(Input): ' Catchment Drainage Imperviousness I. 8300 percent l Catchment Drainage Imperviousness I,• 83,00 percent Catchment Drainage Area Ae 56.400 acres • Catchment Drainage Area A= 58.400 acres Predevelopment NRCS Soil Group Type= C A.B,C.or 0 Predevelopmenl NRCS Soil Group Type= A B,C,or D Return Period for Detention Control T o 5 pare 12.5,10.25,60,or 100) Return Period tot Detention Control T=II 105, years(2,5,ID,25,50,or 700) Time of Concentration of Watershed Te• 28 Minutes Time of Concentration of Watershed Te=ii 2$ minutes that t Release Rate q• 0.39 etelaere Allowable Unit Release Rate q e1 092 Idorm. One-hour Precipitation P,= 1.36 inches One-pour Precipitation P1• 280 inches Design Rainfall OF Formula i-C, P,I(C,+T,IeC, Design Rainfall OF Formula i•Ce P,/(Ca.T,I-Ca , Coefficient One C,• 28.60 Coefficient One Ct= 28.50 i Coefficient Two C2. ID Coefficient Two Ca= 10 Coefficient Three Ca= 0780 Coefnent Three Ca= 0 759 I_ Determination of Average Outflow from the Basin(Calculated): Determination of Average Outflow from the Basin(Calculated): Runoff Coefficient C= 056 Runoff Coefficient C= 0.77 inflow Peak Runoff Op-et ____86 11_,1) Inflow Peak Runoff Op-in= 194.92 'la Allowable Peak Outflow Rate Op-out=_-21 88 s1a Allowable Peak Outlbe.Rate Op.ee4• 34.89 els Mod.FM Minor Storage Volume• 129,336 cable Net Mod.FAA Major Mows Volume• 356,307 cal*pat Mod.FAA Minor Storage Volume• 2.946 eve-6 Mod.FAA Major Storage Volume• 8.180 are-ft 5 <.Enter Setae Durelbn Incremental Increase Value Here(e.9.6 or 5-Minutes) Rainfall Relnfall tallow Adjustment Average Outflow Storage Rainfall Ramps Inflow Adjustment Average Outflow Slone Duration lofatn0y Volume Factor OutRow Volume Volume 0uretion Intensity Volume Factor Outflow Volume Volume mimes Inches 1 hr cubit feat In" cis rabic pet able Stet minutes inches IM ruble led "ma cis cuble feel cubic feat (input! (epout) (aMtl fol69410 looted) (output) (output) (input) (output) (Dotson (output) (Output) lelpat) (output) 0.00 0 0.00 000 0 0 0 0.00 0 000 000 0 0 5 ® 60,721 1.00___,_ 21.88 IIIEMEMEEIll I--- 8.92 IIEIEEELIIMIMTMIIEEIIIMEMOMIZEEMI — 10 MEM 80,643 100 r 21,99 MIDESEMMEIDEMI 10 IIIMEMIIIIIIIMEMIEC=IIIIMMIIMMEIIIIMIIII=M15 c+. 0' 101,1188 1.00 21.88 15 L ,'O. .' �' •,�®es6r_ 20 IIECMIEIMIZEMEICINIIMECIEMIIII=MIIIMIIIII 0IIIIII: IIMEMINIMMEECE 25 UNIEE=IIIIEMEMMEIIIIIMIM 32.025 97,139 ELVIN ® : � 30 22 le �'�Q�ir�f•�{��3•al�� .72�,D+3�nB� .` 54044 I 283.381 3$ 0 149.223 : ' M - 0 ®' 63267 40 1MIMEM .78 158,937 nallIMIIIEZZMNIM13111 26.53 88470 ®'c- 1 as 1.83 ,83,761 0.79 ® 48,480. 117,2114 -•V�� x3,073 50 ® 169,880 Ole 49,762- 63 720,125 389,0 .. 314145 55 IIIIIKEIIIIIIIIIEZIMMICEM 317,699 • 89 1.30 100,518 0.72 76.65 56,927 124,181 - 413,410 0.72 24.80 88,282 324.129 65 1.26 185,201 0.m 16.28 59,910 125,581 424,133 0.70 24.23 94465 329,648 70 1.21 i169,54$169,54$75 69,54$ 0.68 14.07 62,692 126,833 �43c1�,062 0.88 23.74 99,806 334.395 75 193,589 0.87 14.71.,__ ,88,175 ® 75 227 '7'04 0.87 ® 104,890 338,475 80 197,399 1447 I 65,457 M ." 2.17 4.v,'.:: 0-66 m 110,093 341,975-- 85 NM= 200,978 's 72,740- 124,238 BS 2.•: 085 228 - 15,2196_ -...-_- -• 204,390 �.--_ ••,•. -0 6 1 ; 317.510_ �� •.. 78.022 l 128.338 :, -�,.... 2., 488., •0.64 22.31 20499-7 T17.510- . 347.510 .3_._� -.__ .. .__ -...._+ MMI 13.91 78.305 _129,262 •_ f 1:. 0.84 2205 125,702 349.652 100 __ill094 •. � 13.78 82,597 128,030.. 1„ 1D5 0.91 19 Z( 0.62 1303 05,870 I 127,857 I' IIMMIIIII 0.63 21.80 I 136,906 351,435 469,002 ®' 21.80 , 138_708 ....3.333 110 0.08 218,308 I 0.82 13,51 89,162 127,156 11' ® 495,371 21.41 , _141,311 354,050 115 0.06 218,972 i 0.81 13.40 92435 126,537 116 501473 21.23 I 146_514 364.969 _.._ ...._ 120 0.83 221,530 i 0.61 ' 13.28 1 95,717 125,813 120 1.62 I 507,331 MEM�21.0�•71Itrara 151,717 355,615 125 .• 223,990 '.. 13.20 99,000 i 124,991 125 1.57 I 512 966 OM +�a.,i 356,048 _ 130 • : 226,301 •:" 13.11 i 102,282 124,079 130 163 I 678,394 _960 •• . ® 356272 136 -ill. ,648 0.60 13.03 105.565 1.49 623,832 0.80_ ®� ..5557F-_ _ LID 0.74 230,956 i 0.59 12.96 •j, 1.45 } 028,693 .0 g0- ® 172028 356,165 ' �� 232684 0.59 , 12.89 ,7,5' 1.41 533,591 0.59 ,.. 177,731 ' 355,859 150 0.70 235,069 -I- 0.69 I 12.93 115,412 '•-. 1.38 I 538_335 , 0.59 162,834 355,401 135 058 237,077 j- 0.50 ...1._-12.70 118.694 ® ?:35,.. 042.938 0.58 ® 188,197 354,799 780 0.67 289028 t 056 12.71 _121,977 117,051 1.31 547404 i 0.50 20,14 . I ......t_._ '__..- t ® 354.084 165 1 095 240,924 058 1285 125,259 115,884 -'. 1.28 551,745 - 0,58 20.05 198,543 353,203 • 170 0.64 242.766 r 0.59 12.80 -I-128,542 MEM MEMO1.26 I 555.969 19.98 ' 203,748 352,224 ' _-.____" 175 0.83 244,564 r 057 12.55 131,824 „. 112,740 173_ 1.23 580.082 19.80 -209948 351,133 Rio 0,61 246,314 0.57 i 12.51 135,107 111,207 - 3 .__, 180 1.20 564_089 ® 349,938 185 i 0.60 248,020 I-"---- 12.47 05 --- •. .057 738,380 109,631 185 7,18 587,987 19.70 219,354 349,943 .--.. 190 0.59 249,688t 0.57 4243 147 E72 106,014 190 1.16 r 571,811 19.74 229,757 4. 345.774 195 O.SB 261 372 . 0.57 1238 144,954� 708,358 195 1 19 I 575,538 19$1 229,780 t� 945,778 2 _.... -..... IIII 00 057 252902 � 0.58 12.75 148237 104,605 200 1,71 I 679,176 .•- 19.68 233 4,883 344.213 205 0.58 , 254458 038 12.32 151_519 ' 102,937 205 1.09 MENEM 18.53 I 240,108 342570 210 0.66 255_977 0.56 MEM 154,802 101,175 210 1.07 i 586,219 MX= 19.47 245,389 340,850 215 0.54 257,488 0.58 1225 150,084 99,361 1.03 589,028 0.56 19.42 220 0.53 258,924 0.66 I 12.22 191,387 97,557 220 1.03 592988 '®®® 225 0.62 2600,363 056 t 12.20 154,649 95,704_ 226 1.02 586241 IIKEINIIIMEEEMINEMIE ,,.230^ , 0.61 281,754 058 12.17 167932 l 53,623 MEM 1.00 569450 �'T.IINirElli® 333,270 235 0.60 I 283,120 055 I 1214 171214 I 91,915 0.99 602598 0.56 331,215 240 I 0.49._- 264,478 065 1212 174497 j 89981_ IIIIMINIIIIIIIIM 805_887 0.65 275,588 329,1_01_,-_._ 245 0.49 265,002 0.55 12.09 177,779 69,023 245 mr•- 608,720 mizimargimi 281,789 I 326.931 250 0.48 287,103 12.07 181,062 86,042 250 IMI=Ell 611699 gmEmingam 288,982 i-._324707_... 255_ -1.47 , _ 184,344 84,037 _ 255 617,503 14 626 ass ®® -- 290 0.46 147.627 82.011 280 7 503! 32D,1Ds 285 0.48 270,873 , 190909 79964 265 { 0.90 820,332 • 0 55 •c 302,851 , 317,731 270 I 0.46 272,086 194,192 77,896 ��-270 I 0.00 823115- 055 ®" 307,804 -1- 315,311 276 0.44 065 11.97 197.474 75808 275 0.87 1111 825,052 0 55 =UM 313.006 312,848 280 0.44 MIECIIIM80 0.55 11.96 200,758 ` 73.703 280 0.88 628547 0.55 10.94 318,209 1 310338 • 28.5 0.43 276,618 056 11.93 204,039 71570 285 O.ss 631200 055 .... 70.91 32JA12 _ 307789- - 290 ' 0.13 270,709 054 , 11 92 t 207.321 I- 69 436 - 20(1 0.61 033 873 0.51 18.89 328 015 305.198 295 0.5, 277,683 054 , 17.90 210604 07279 295 0,83 636387 333818 302,569 300 042 278,991 f 0.54 I 11.88 1 273 886 65,104 300 0.82 i 836 923 051 1983 339,021 i 295,502 Mod.FAA Minor Storage Volume(cable h.l- 125,336 Mod.FAA Major Storage Volume(cubic IL)• 356,307 Mod.FAA Minor Storage Volume(ears-ff.)• 2.9462 Mod.FAA Major Storage Votu me(acre-fl.). 9.1767 UDFCD DETENTION VOLUME ESTIMATING WORKBOOK Version 2.035,Released March 2008 POND Bats,Modified FAA 6/25O008,1203 PM DETENTION VOLUME BY THE MODIFIED FAA METHOD (See USDCM Volume 1 Storage Chapter for description of method) • Project: HIGH POINT AT MEAD-POND B Basin ID: PR-2 Inflow and Outflow Volumes vs.Rainfall Duration 700.000 aeairee600,000 I M 500,000 I T., 400,000 LL u u •••,.•• ••NN•••••N•••H• ass,"•••• c 300,000 �� •••• > --- ---- - -- -- ----------- 200000 • • -_-.. - - -- i I 000Q0000000 000000000 000p 100,000 Duo oo°°°^000,000 (III' 0 1 0pD0p0p000 0 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 Duration(Minutes) - -Minor Storm Inflow Volume —a—Minor Storm Outflow Volume 0 Minor Storm Storage Volume --Major Storm Inflow Volume —•—Major Storm Outflow Volume • Major Storm Storage Volume • UDFCD DETENTION VOLUME ESTIMATING WORKBOOK Version 2.03a,Released March 2008 POND B.xle,Moth,l N FAA 5/25/2008 12 03 PM DETENTION VOLUME BY THE MODIFIED FM METHOD (See USDCM Volume 2 Storage Chapter for description of method) • Project: HIGH POINT AT MEAD-POND C Basin ID: PR•3 (For catchments less than 160 acres only. For larger catchments,use hydrograph routing method) (NOTE:for catchments larger than 90 acres,CUHP hydrograph and routing are recommended) Determination of MINOR Detention Volume Using Modified FAA Method Determination of MAJOR Detention Volume Using Modified FAA Method Design Information(Input): Design Information(Input): Catchment Drainage imperviousness I.= 6000 percent Catchment Drainage Imperviousness cent catchment Drainage Area A= acres perviousness AI.= 60.00 acres B02W catchment Area A= 80200 Pretlevelopmeto NRCB Soil Group Type= C ]C B'C'DID Returnlepmena NRCS Soil Group Type= C acres Return Period for Detention Control T= 5 years(25.10,25,50,Sr 100) Return Period for Detention Control T=I 100 l yeaminutes 5,10,25,50,or 100) Time of Concentration of Watershed Tc= e Time of Concentration of Watershed = 40 e Allowable Unit Release Rate q= 0 2 minute .30 css/acie Allowable Unit Release Rate t p= 060 cfslacre One-hour Precipitation Pr= 1.95 inches One-hour Precipitation P,= 2 inches Inches Design Rainfall IDF Formula i=C,'Pil(CfF.)^C, Design Rainfall IDF Formula I=CS P,/(C,eT.)"C, Coefficient One Ci= 2650 Coefficient One Ci= 28.50 Coefficient Two c,= 10 Coefficient Two C,= is Coefficient Three C.= 5769 Coefficient Three C,= 0]88 Determination of Average Outflow from the Basin(Calculated): Determination or Average Outflow from the Basin(Calculated): Runoff Coefficient C= 046 Runoff Coefficient C. 083 inflow Peas Runoff Op-in= 04.71 cfs Inflow Peak Runoff Opin= 17395 cis Allowable Peak Outflow Rate Op-out= 3064 cfs Allowable Peak Outflow Rate Opout= 08.36 cfs Mod.FAA Minor Storage Volume• 66,952 cubic feet Mod.FAA Major Storage Volume• 358,588 cubic feet Mod.FAA Minor Storage Volume= 1,996 acre-ft Mod,FAA Major Storage Volume• 0.232 acre-R 5 <-EnterRainfall Duration Incremental Increase Value Here(e.0.5 for 5-Minutes) Rainfall Rainfall Inflow Adjustment Average Outflow Storage Rainfall Rainfall Inflow Adrusfinent Average Outflow Storage Duration Intensity Volume Fader Outflow Volume Volume Duration Intensity Volume Factor Outflow Volume Volume minutes inches/hr cubic feel m cis cubic Net cubic feel minutes inches/hr cubic feet cia cubic feet cubic feet (Input) (output) (output) (output) (output) (output) (output) (input) (output) (output) (output) (output) (output) (output) a 000 _i.. 0 0.00 0.03 a 0 0 0 0 i 0 OM 0.00 0 '. 0 ..._.... 5 I 4.54 I 50,269 100 3060 9191 41078 5 092 i 135,142 I 1.00 4536 10508 120,634 (_ 362 60122 180 3068 . 18362 81]90 10 7A $15399 146 4036 29016 ! 183383 I j 30.54 27.573 15 48.36 43,525 15 263y 110]71 100 yI 30.64 I 38784 { ]9607744 20 5.16 i 3128511 �p ) 40.38 55,033 254818 20 2fi3 1163]1 1.00 i i 819 25 ! 2.334_44 128805 1.00 30.84 45955 02050 25 4.5] 306,280 00 48.36 1 72,541 273,739 30 209 139110 100 3084 55108 03964 30 d.tt 373984 100 45.36 0]049 ( 266,935 191 18]092 1.00 30.64 64,336 0355fi 35 3]5 39]594 _ 1.00 4638 10155] 296,03] 40 1,75 15553] 180 i 3064 7352] 82,010 40 3.45 418140 I 180 4836 ( 116465 I� 302,082 45 183 162304 095 i 29.07 ]0215 _7-84,089 45 I 3.20 i 438330 D95 45]3 I 123,465 3128]9 50 152 163372 090 r-2]_60 82810 85,56$ 50 299 I 052653 I 090_ 935] 1 130,]19 i 321939 55 1.43 _ 173875 086 I_ 26.48 I 8]446 03489 55 2.80 467,445 086 41.81-1 137,973 329,473 • 60 135 1]8909 0.83 1 25.56 I 92001 _.. 869Th 60 ! 264 4 480979 I 053 4034 T- I45Y27 335]52 fi5 120 183548 DB 24.]] r 9859] 86,952 65 250 493451 081 39.10 152481 340,9]3 70 121 18I 655 079 j 28.09 101 92 56,883 70 238 505030 r D]9 3803 159,735 343295 75 1.16 _ 191 B]2 0 7] { v 23.51 105]W 86.250 ]5 2.27 595,030 077 37.11 968,909 848,61 _9 4,44_4444480 1.10 195,639 075 I 2300 110363 05,258 60 208 1 525956 1 075 35.30 I 174,243 351,713 85 ! 1.06 199,185 0 74 1 22.54 114,978 84,207 05 206 535,491 I 0 70 3559 10148] 353,993 r BO 182 202,53744_ 0]2 ( 22.14 119 5]4 8$963563 90 { 2 00 544,502 l 0.72 3495 _ 180751 ! 355,750 L 95 096 205716 ' 071 21.78 I 124159 _ 81546 _ 95 ! 192—1 55367 _ D]1 34.39 136,006 357,042 100 090 208]39 y 0 70 H 21 46 i 128765 79,974 100 1,65 i 561175 i 0]0 33.80 I 203,260 35]915_ 105 091 211,622 F 069 69 21.17 133350 70262 105 179 I 568,926 i 069 3341 210,514 358,412 110 ! CBB 2143]8 068 2090 _I 137955 76423^ 110 173 57fi33fi-1 086 33,00 217]68 353558 __.ass115 092 219654 -_-067 2048 107551 74460_ 115 I 18] 583,435 I 067 _I 3261 225,0$$ T-353413 120 I 125 080 229,593 050 I 20237, 51,147 42 70_9 125 15 120 7 1 598007 066_.f. 31.90 F 239 i 590,251 I 267 3226 5]07It 357276 0.76 2 343 ,794 357335 130 i 0 224,342 0.5065 20.04__. 156338 68,008 130 153 603,122 0.65 31,6 248]09 356,336 135 J 074 i 226799 065 4I 197] 160526 _83,271 135 149 I 609216 I 0.65 31.36 254038 355178 190 1 0 74 I 228]99 _ 084 1 19]1 165528 _63271 140 105 _ ' 615105 I 054 31.11 261,292 ) 353,012 105 072 230,918 080 1955 r 170124 60]94 145 1.41 620802 I 064 3007 268,546 I 352,$56 150 0 70 232,971 063 1901 I 174,7197, 59,252 150 _I_ 1,38 1 626322 063 30.64 ' 275,801 350,521 155 l _-_ I 068 ] 234963 063 1928 179315 5565 155 I 138 I 531675 063 30.44 I 283055 343621 160 067 238,895 0831-19.16 03910 52986 180 131 63 673 063_.... -...-- I _ 30.2 0,309 li 348,589 238]]5 __062 •... _..- 185 085 19.6 166,505 50269 165 126 5459$4 062 3008 297663 j 304,362 _ 170 064 240603 0.62 I 1893 1931c1 47,502 170 1.25 54fi838 i 0.52 _ 2985 30481] j 342,022 175 0.63 244117 061 I 18.73 20,29] 41925 175 123 858283 I 061 I 2957 312,321 336550 ` 180 nisi 244117 061 18]3 202292 41825 180 { 120 853286 0 6 F 2957 318325 336,960 195 0.60 1 245459 61 1864 206,888 30971 195 1.15 660272 061 I 2822 328833 331,457 195 059 I 24]071 060 15.47 1211073 35 ]2 190�__1.13 665504 060 29.15 j 343037 321416 195 058 200,646 060 1639 22604 22972 200 111 i 669504 i 060 i 29.03 I 348,341 325,487 205 05] 25067 060 I 1631 220259- 29,972- 200 1,11 673939 ! 060 _I 2803 I 348,341 322,39]_ 205 055 252 94 060 15.24 225,259 26,917 205 I- 107 6P9Bc 060 28.81 355595 319,182 253,694 Ofi0 L� 210 054 . I 1324 I 234460 23705 215 1.05 682032 I 059 j 2680_ ,_47- 362,850 I 315,895 215 053 255169 059 j 18.18 I 234066 20,705 215 i 1.05 685998 059 I 2868 3]0104 315,895 220 053 I 25065 059 p _-- 18.01 249 056 1]350 220 41 1.02 699 692 0 59 I 28.49 387612 312527 225 052 258420 0.59 17.05 243247 10173 230 1.02 693422 059 1 28.40 39462 309080 230 0 51T 259752 0.59 17.99 I 25224] 235 088 701066 _ 058 28.41 391120 301,585 240 049 I 252119 059 17.93 I 25762 7940 235 I 098 701668 059 I 2622 403170 291,908 240 009 252119432 050 19,88 25]130 4681 240 097 ]04662 950 20,$$ 4063]0 293309 245 049 2fi3032 058 1].83 i 262033 _ 1399 245 095 700211 050 _28. 4136$0 294,583 250 O 260721 058 17]8 286829 820 1908 250 1 084 711,577 058 r 28.06 7 420,882 280795 255 0.47 `265988 _ 0.58 1].]3 I 2]1$24 -523] 255 093 715030 _056 27,91 435,190 256948 200 046 j 25]453 058 1764 I 285410 8587 260 I 090 723720 053 2]81 835390 273078 265 046 I 255 457 050 1]84 $80915 1958 265 099 721]21 053 1 27_80 44265 2]900 270 0 4 005 269861 0 57 1759 I 285010 15349 270 0.89 J ]24953 i 0 57 I 27,]( 498099 2]506c 275 0.44 I 2]0846 0 57 I 17 55 289606 18]60 275 ' 0B] 728144 4 057 I 24]1 45]153 2]0991 0 f 280 04 0 I_ 2]$012 5] 19.51_ 294 201 22 189 280 I 0.85 ]30365 05] l 27 0B8 I 731,279 _j4 0 57 55 464 i ]t 6807,262]00 • 200 0.43 0.43 _i�]3161 0.57 17 47 298]9] 2583] 285 _ 290 0 57 1 17.40 2295 043 I 2]5005 I 303,392 7 -29,101 05] 1]40_- I 346966 32500_ 295 I 083 740400 0 5 r 244] 406169 26231_ 390 042 278502 087 1]3] 1 312583 36081 300 0.B2 i 743,351 i 0.57 j' 2741 483,423 259920 Mad FAA Minor Storage Volume(cubic fig= 66,952 ,MW.FAA Major Storage Volume(cubic R.)• 358,568 Mad FAA Minor Storage Volume(acre-R.). 1.9962 Mad FAA Major Storage Volume(acre-ft.). 8.2316 UDFCD DETENTION VOLUME ESTIMATING WORKBOOK Version 2033 Released March 2008 POND C xls,Modified FAA 6/252000,12:04 PM 1 DETENTION VOLUME BY THE MODIFIED FAA METHOD (See USDCM Volume 2 Storage Chapter for description of method) IIII Project: HIGH POINT AT MEAD-POND C Rasin ID: PR-3 -- — ---. --- -- --- -- I inflow and Outflow Volumes vs.Rainfall Duration 800,000 J t . 700,000 • . • .' .. . I 600,000 •. . . ..__[ ._ I . . .. .....- _.._. .._ .._ . . , --'---- � - - - - w af - - n 400,000 • O , • m • —000300,000 • l_ . . .. ••,, ... . ••• •� —_._. •• _.._ • • III • 200,000 • 100,000 - . oo0O Ow...:i000000000„- 0 p0pOP�00 -- -I _ OQhOvO • . ....--— 0 . 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 Duration(Minutes) —0—Minor Storm Inflow Volume —th—Minor Storm Outflow Volume O Minor Storm Storage Volume ♦—Maor Storm Inflow Volu* --*-Major Storm Outflow Volume • Maor Storm Storage Volume - 1 • UDFCD DETENTION VOLUME ESTIMATING WORKBOOK Version 2.03a,Released March 2008 POND C.xls,Modified Fin./1, 6425/2008,12 04 PM DETENTION VOLUME BY THE MODIFIED FAA METHOD (See USDCM Volume 2 Storage Chapter for description of method) • Project: HIGH POINT AT MEAD-POND D Basin ID: PR-4 (For catchments less than 160 acres only. For larger catchments,use hydrograph routing method) Warning:This worksheet is not intended for catchments larger than 160 acres. Determination of MINOR Detention Volume Using Modified FAA Method Determination of MAJOR Detention Volume Using Modified FAA Method Design Information(Input): Design Information(Input): Catchment Drainage imperviousness 1a= 60.00 percent Catchment Drainage Imperviousness 1,= 8O00 percent Catchment Drainage Area WARNING. A= 108500. c-WARNING Catchment Drainage Area A= 198.500 Predevelopment MRCS Soil Group Type= C ACr55C,orD Fredevelopmenl NRC55oil Group Type= C Ac06C,or0 Return Period for Detention Control T= 5 years(2,5,10,25,50,or 100) Return Period for Detention Control T el 100 Iyears{2,5.10,25,50,or 100) Time of Concentration of Watershed Tc= 43 minutes Time of Concentration of Watershed Ice 43 mmutes Allowable Vno Release Rate q= 0.36 cfslecre Allowable Unit Release Rate cfs/acre One-hour Precipitation P,= 1.35 Inches one-hour Precipitation atlon F,0 65 inches Design Rainfall UV Formula I=C.Pr)ICaFTeI^Cr Design Rainfall l OF Formula i=Ca'P,/let`kl^Cs Coefficient One C,= 28.50 CoeH¢ient One C,= 2650 Coefficient Two C,= 10 Cnarcmlem Two Cc= 10 Coefficient Three C,= 0.789 L coefficient Three C,= 6789 Determination of Average Outflow from the Basin(Calculated): Determination of Average Outflow from the Basin(Calculated): Runoff Coefficient Cu 0.46 _ Runoff coefficient C= 0.63 Inflow Peak Runoff Op-in= 152.79 cis (slew Peak Runoff Op-in= 410.76 cgs Allowable Peak Outflow Rate Op-out= 70.74 cis Allowable Peak Outflow Rate Op-out= 110 00 Mad.FAA Minor Storage Volume a __221,582 cable feet Mod.FAA Major Storage Volume• Mod.FAA Minor Storage Volume 5,08] acre-ftB0Betc ac Mod.FAA Major Storage Volume• 30.885 acre-ft 5 <-Enter Rainfall Dunllon Incremental Increase Value Here(e.g.Slot 5-Minutes) Rainfall Rainfall Inflow Adjustment Average Outflow Storage Rainfall Rainfall Inflow Adjustment Average Outflow Storage Duration Intensity Volume Fader Outflow volume Volume Duration Intenslly Volume Factor Outflow Volume Volume minutes Inches/hr cubic het cis cubic feel cubic feet minutes inches/hr come met ma cubic feet cubic feet (Input) (output) (output) (output) (output) (output) (outpu) {input) (output) (Output) (output) (output) (output) (output) a D.00 o °°°_._._._.__2. j_ D B o I 000 I 5 I 0.00 0.00 0 I o 5 4,54 123,164 r 100 70.74 I 21222 101942 5 8.92 331,115 I 100 11009 • 33,012 288,16 10 3.62 ) 185,305 100 1 70.71 I 42,444 t 153864 10 7.11 527,755 I 100 110.04 85,024 1 461731 15 3.04 _ 246926 100 I 70.74 7 536e5 183280 1 15 5.55 I 663,037~ 100 110.04 89,036 I 564801 20 2.63 255,123 1.00 I 70.74 84,858 200,235 20 510 • 76,525 I 100 I 110.04 ._132040 634,477 25 2.33 315566 100 ' 7074 I 105,110 208978 25 - 457 : 848429-1 100 110,04 185,60 683,369 30 2.09 340,637 1.00 I 70]4 r 12],332 213,506 30 4.11 818307 1.00 110,04 188,072 715,235 56 35 1 382350 100-1 70.74 I 148,554 213,800 35 3 75� 6870 150893 211310 45 320 18_89,B3 100 110,04 l 231,064 760,418 40 1.76 381086 100 70 79 159 776 211310 40 3.45 1024514 I 100 110.04 i- 264096 ]60410 45 _ 183 387884 0.97 0.87 106.98 I 258055 ]00228 50 1.52 412533 083 I 65.43 I 196,304 210230 55 2.99 1,109057 I 093 10179 305,381 1 003,696 55 125 428014 059 82]0 I 208915 21_100 55 2.80 1145300 ` 089 9154 4) 321,067 023,433 • 60 1.35 430348 085 80,42-T-217,520 220,523 4 6 2.64 11]6058 I 0.85 93.98 338373 840,005 85 I 1.25 449)10 003 50.50 1 22813] 7. 221582 85 250 1209,025 I 053 90,98 354,6]9 ( 854,146]0 1]1 460287 1 000 56.81 235)98 2$1520 ]0 _.,238 1237.386 I Deo 6013 - 371,385 I 896,001 75 1.18 ]p 111 0 7 1 5541 249,359 220.752 ]5 22] J 11863,846 D.IO 80.20 357091 0]5,95] _ 80 1 1.10 4]9338 0.77 4 54 16 4 259870 219,3]0 80 217 1]88850 I 0.7] 1 0425 ' 404,39] 804,281 _81 217.448 85 2 08 1 312019 1 0.75 85 16 900028 r0]5 I 5306 1 28050. 215050 90 2.00 1,334,098 074 85.55 43],409 896,809 .53 420,803 891,116 504 025 i 0 72 I 51 19 :I 291,803 6 95 1 2 1,355,034 4 190 081 J 515500 079 4904 313026 1 255,675 110 0 1.73 1412039 072 7923 483,B25 901012 BO 102 496241 1 070 520] 071 78.40 470421 954527 5 I _.y— _ 070 7].29 46,99 90]012_ 100 Doe 511436 0]1 5040 30246 209023 100 105 1374946 105 091 510,500 0]0 49 fig 33025 2DS q]6 105 1]9 1383939 ' r 78.28 503,433 908,882 115 085 531]24 ~ O68 I 484_4 33424] _ 19],4]] 115 18] _1920409 t- 068 ( 7535 I 519,939 909,550 t I 1 I ) 7451 538,445 808 120 050 53]936 O87 4740 344558 1930]0 120 182 1448189 068 500 125 I 050 53,910 I- 06] I 9]90 I 355968 188,441 125 1 5 1,452,250 I t)6] I 7373 I 552,951 909,299 130 -1 078 549886 I 06 T 96 93 I 36606 163506 130 1.53 10]]724 7_ 066 I 7301 568,457 908,26] 135 I 0.78 555,21906 "I-4651 I 3]6,691 178,529 135 149 1482855 0.66 I 72.34585963 906,692 145 I 0.7472 505770 0 6 46.11 30]302 173285 100 105 150]003 1 065 r 603089 904811 145 072 565]]9 , 065 45,]4 ' 39]913 18]866 145 141 I 1521003 . 055 I 71.15 6188]5 90268 150 070 570009 064 I 4539 40852 152280 150 1,38 1534,566 j 064 70.61 635481 899085 155 i 088 5]5608 I 054 9507 I 918135 156553 155 I 13 1541683 084 70.11 851,98] 895,696 160 1 t)6] 590,425 - 083 477_ 46 150,679 _ 160 31 15~ 3 I 698 668,453 091,925 L j 589507 L 063 , 4421 450960 130510 110 1,26J 1584035 083 86]0 701 185 __1 085 505029 0 6 4448 440 357 1448]2 165 120 1572]95 063 8919 684999 081]96 170 I 084 -' 175 I 063 593,860 0824 4361 51579 132289 175 123 1596558 062 88.30 7180101 078547 I 150 081 598117 L 062 4372 472 50 125928 180 120 180]981 0.62 I 8801 734517 673,484 le5 060 602261 061 4350 I 482801 119460 L 185 I 118 I 1819122 I 061 4 576 751023 68088 190 1 059_ 808305 061 4328 1 493412 112694 190 115 629899 081 i 67.33 761529 562465 195 557a Se I 610.255 OB 4308 504023 06232 195 1.13 1690812 00 01 1 8).01 ]BI,65 856 5]] 200 05] 1 817114 060 I 4279 524245 92441 200 101 61139 081 I 8641 86547 044418 205 055 482]581 060 4 42]3 b 525045 82726 205 i 107 161,063 060 i 6613 833,04] 844510 215 055 4 521177 065 42,53 I 535,055 65]28 210 1 0 I 1 671 063 060 I 86.16 •-' 833553 837510 215 054 2519] 080 42.36 k 546 087 78]30 215 i 105 1 1600000]83 I 060 8590 850,059 L 60,724 6 220 053 828]38 080 4220 5570]8 ]1060 220 1 03 1690303 080_ 6585 565,565 _23,]38 225 052 532208 I 059 4205 56]689 64520 225 I 1.02 I 1699633 059 I _8541 883071 016253 230 '051 835611 I 059 4191 1 5]5300 5]312 2304 100 I 1758700 I 059 I— 85.19 0995]] 009,253 L 5 235_ 0 88911 5068 095 059 849] 91606_ 001,9]1 240 09950 638948 D 059 642229 059 4163 599522 42,703 240 1 08] 1726560 e_ 059 64]6 032069 ]93,9]1 245 049 645440 059 41.51 810,133 3 35308 245 095 L 1735208 ' 059 1— 6456 999,095 76,111 250 040 1 648599 59 1 4138 620 744 9856 26 094 1)43897 059 1 &3] 985601 ]]8098 L 255_ 04] 851]03 058 412] I 631356 20348 255 093 1)52641 058 64.19 98210] 789934 _. ._. _1_ 260 0.48 I 0 854]53 0 s5 I 41 15 641988 12]88 285 1 0.91 1780 242 0 58 t 8401 998,513 781829 205 4 040 I 857]53 058 L 4104 l 6525]] 51]6 285 090 . 176836 058 T 6369 1015118 75310] T270 445 660]6 0ase00 4094 663188 _ 2484 270 089 1]]6238 057 63 fie 1031625 ]14813_ 95 044 663,005 059 4064 l 6]3)99 f 10192 275 j on 1751042 050 6352 1008131 735911 280_1 0 4 866463 06 I 4074 684010 1]946 280 I 086 L 1,751724 . 0 58 1 8337 106463] 72]08] 285 043 1 8892]5 a 0 57 0064 685021 25]44 285 085 1]9928 _ OS] H 6322 1081143 718119 • 360 543 LI I 87254] 057 40.55 I 70563�_335ss 290 084 1808]35 0.57 6305 109]649 1 ]09,086 FAA Minor Storage Volume{cubic ft.)• 221,582 295 I z9s- 54z 6]a,ne Mod.M .FAA Minor Storage Vole rne DDETENT VNVOLUM-ft.). 5.0868 Mod.ESTIMATING WORKBOOK Versiono203a.Released March 2080 MalrSorage Volume(acreT[4a ma547_ 355 002 077405 057 038 726854 -00388 300 002_ 1821302 057 8201 1130661 890601 Mod.FAA Major e Volume(cubic E 744 se UDFCPOND D xis,Modified FAA 8/25/2058,12.04 PM L---- DETENTION VOLUME BY THE MODIFIED FAA METHOD (See USDCM Volume 2 Storage Chapter for description of method) E • Project: HIGH PDINT AT MEAD-POND D Basin ID. PR-4 Inflow and Outflow Volumes vs.Rainfall Duration 2,000,000 1,800,000 -- -- -: -- - - 1600,000 ..400............s...."111t- - - _ . 1,400,000 _— .. 1,200,000 01 ai : . • u 1,000,000 . • > 800,000 •� ••�s,o,000 —I• •• —._ = ice= _': _— _.. 600,000 400,000 = i . 200,000 00on t? , 0000ow0000up°OO t • _ _ °o•oo°p°o° 4 -• - 0 I tEl000 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 Duration(Minutes) I -A-Minor Storm Inflow Volume Minor Storm Outflow Volume O Minor Storm Storage Volume —0—Major Storm Inflow Volume er Major Storm OUHI0w Volurw \ — Major Storm Stomp Volume • UDFCD DETENTION VOLUME ESTIMATING WORKBOOK Version 2.03a,Released March 2008 POND D.Ids,Walled FAA 612512008.12:04 PM • APPENDIX C Historic CUHP Input&Output • • CD N N [O c 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 m u m u oct LL • u LL v v u c o v 0 a 0 a c Z p O o 0 0 U E u j LL J ❑ J a j 0000 U m o 0 0 0 ❑ J Q 0 ❑ 00000 y t v 6 0 0 0 ry N O N O O O O E❑ V n a. p 0000 c c d o d o p 0 0 00 L E N C C LL y y O O O o C 9 0 0 0 0 p▪ r M n Cfl CO t 2 p ° c E L . 0000 Da . g 6 6 6 6 E m c 2 E u y E c w w CO CO CO CO y p y a o 0 0 n .2 L y O ❑ y c a �- • 0000 C Z N N N N Ud 6 • E N O h 0 Co Co r CO y o 000 \ 6 0 0 0 o y W 0 r r N iO 0) y 00 o 6000 0) w O 0 3 E N V) V «O D 0 t( N th _N O O co co 0 d E M ❑ O W N N- O co N o O c - v 0 E 6000 CD a c < w 2 d ❑ N y E E ` z c U U U p y ccc O O O O a CI) N f7 N N C q d' KLL >- N } N a N N N N ❑ • = N 0 O CO N u E E L E p My p w www V7 U w V N 0 m 0 E_ ci a N C 7 N V Sy o 0 a N Cl 0 E va 0 0 0 O 0 a et" N LL N N 0 1N d N LO 0 N 0 :%C-3 a w a N b 0 ,78E88 U y t O O O O K U W K C W " �. 00eN E N 0 O N 9 W O 0 v N N 0 Of CJ N N F 0 a Q V N a a O 0) N 00 sex — N: 666 a N C 9 F a E w as 7- 0 )00 a (O O N N C 1` F f- (� V 0 A m Oa N E (0 VON O N E )n " N Cri - ` n C N N N r a c c N m o a N 0 0 0 o0 0 0 m n c .16500. • ri = C c ,rNN O Dh C < V N N 0 3E v ro0 M N N V NNNN 0 0 0 0 N d 9 V) N 0 N a ry V o O 0 0 0 U C co E o a a a E 0 U .) 9 U a N O L C O E w o E o aco t U U U U O O O y__y y_ N O .0 >7 K K K NNN NYN • C d E `o C R a E t www w O q w < CO U w CO O O O cacao a .26666 moot C d a o d LL S U CV LL O 0 O 0 O 0 O 9 C Z O O O O O m co O u ` E ° d❑ J a j 2888 0 6666 o J 0 U 0 0000 m0 0000 y N O ,16666 E00 `- _ m a y 0 0 0 0 C SEES p & 26666 N N C C LL N y O O O O C q ^ 0 0 0 0 p 0 p N c 2 - 0 . 0 . m L y 0 0 0 0 e b L o n U w fa C • 6666 N m m m m y p y o 0 0 0 n '2 L a p ❑ a ` _. • 0 0 0 0 C Z N N N N 00 gm aE E NMO m m r m m0000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 y 0 m m 0 V 0) L j� ) S06666 3E E 2 C 'N 660 . 06666 c N m E tv C OM r r O C 0 M N 0 m A E o 0 0 0 N o & a N O d v E E ` z U U U U m y o o o o a p, 0000 nim _ ccccccw » » x ❑ • U E o z" C m 0 E t E p - N m p X X W X Ul U W W W W t a m n 4 m E h o rn(0 0 ^' J " o N N 0 Q f � N 0 N 0 V a N mrnmm E m 13 m g 0 y LL O N N 0 N CO N co r-- €6. Loco L % V W co a 0 f ry W N N CO 0 0 0 N ✓ y NNN N U20 0 O O O O X V W W - O N 0 cc E �, N N oo N o m vi p v N N T CO N y 01 N N V r 0 0 P V N ‘- -\C a a a a N a: x d A 0 0 0 O CJ m 2 a 9 ti a •E N 0 a 0 0 00 V 0 •A O N A A P A3 CO at CD CO P O N E n Lp ee •c N N SE A P 0 0 a A O P W OWN r- 22 y 0 0 0 A O 3a ai = • ^ LOOM CO C C 0 m 0 h C V P N N C 3 E m` roo NNNN 0 0 � V o 0 O 0 d OD N N 0 N W 0 6 0 0 0 C U U C C A E O C a a E m U 0 m N m E y E 0 m .C L U V U U O O O O N_.2 C K K K K > Y O >- u') N • 0 C w � E o C m a E r E V N V X X X N 0 W W W W O M M 0 c0000 0 0 0 2 t 06 0 66 U 0 o 0 a0 LL • V Q V _ u c0000 0 0 0 C OC o O O a a O m U or, u d - LL J a j O o o O U 06666 ❑ J U U 0000 0 U N W 0 0 0 0 ry N O 26666 300 m m a m 000 6666 6 0 0 � � 0 0 0 _ t S° td '- E• LL � y 0 0000 • _ O O O O O• & L O y E 2 c 0000 — o 226666 o m 8.r u - E c LO 0 0)• = M (LP, M M m g26666 0000 c 2 o u ❑ - - 0 • 0000 C Z N N N N 00 N a a E N i0 (0 0 0)0)'- M y - 0000 ar 0000 O Y 00)r r N 00) 0) Ct 0 0 0 �0 d O O O O C f E N U) r Q 5 N N LU N M . 0 6 6 0 0 0 ° o E ❑ U " C OONN N N o 0 r Q .y E 0000 2 m c > a " N U! ❑ U) y U 0 U Z 8888 N ✓ w VI a cc xxxx zwzz p m » » — m6066 0. 2 ❑ • 7 v U E `o z m w E E E L V X M mXAXA U w W W w N 0 L mo co co •- E o a m O d!d Ur f t') N E > Q m • m x o v 0 n n m E d o a o O a N LL O () Q Q 6 N 0N K U d U O O N N Q M N W Q � N co O (O d co d Q P 4 O V y t O O O % W % O N(O N E (O O P N cOlUDON a O)O O m N N N n 0 N N U N CO O d CO Y d d 6 M 2 N 0 0 , n O O d d C • E a E b Ce (0 0 N in o 0 (q .n a'ra 16 m n n v vi at w E m 0 DD (O Q O N E L CC C N N a S E d n _0 d n O P W O N d O O O n c• v3m O- r;• ,T. J o O• c Loom co 0 C P P N N 3E no0 o Q QCO N N N N a O O a O 00 d o 0000 d r r h LO CO V o 0 O O U N a v c A E E o 0. E L 0 A � 3 ✓ E d c E U N y a U U V t o o O O L co N_ _N N_ 0 »» 0 0 0 � w o y � E `o z L CO d E t E a N coQ w a w w N U W W W W O N 00 c0000 0 0 0 Nj o o O O O 0) V o U C K a A LL U co U C O O O O V V LL C 0 O O O O Co U a u E m — LL W❑ J a j 0000 U m o 0 0 0 O J U ❑ 0000 O TC — 0000 a O o O o O b O N O O O O E n d y 0000 C N N N N p m -" 6666 _ t E IC C C '_C IL N 0 0000 C _ 0000 ar L L O N 2 - 0000 • 7777 a Z y o 0 0 0 m v n p n u O E C N MN M U) t") C')(7(') y 0000 o .E .5 m❑ y c c a — • 0000 C 2 N N N N d y u p a E N N N O 0) 0) r m 0 ,-. 0000 o.r o000 p N m 0 t N m n O 0)) S m o 000 c . 3 E N Y) — w O y N N N N) p 0 0 0 0 E C1 ❑ U "' O o m e n O c o" 0 V M w E 0 0 0 0 m � a d ❑ N v E E U U U U ` z O 888 A N N N d a 2 2 2 3 a re6OO d K c )) } O 0000 a 2 ❑ . a U E o m � t p NMy O m x x x CA U wwww N N N E h L E ^ 0 a) N m a 5 O m N of m o ti o � N n O > N N P 9 e, T NO Y] • E N A V O N N E a 3 N N LL 0 P NN ell d ^ v o 0 y •V K • O N OD 0 N W NNP'- a a CANCAN o y N 0 l0 (O 0 d d L W iW O N 0 N CD co 0 E N t0 O N ✓ V Cf. p N N W COCJ N Ti O NN V CO m r CO Y R a a 2 0) I-co O x n00 ei 0 a E a E La o comr d co o N LC) n `o m r e a 3 m a a E [ P O N - E ^ N N r h a n . E 3 E a L PI N O co O d h O P m • Fa?, O a ,E) tO 13 d o >, Y • _ n o rn n C 7 N C Q P N E 3 E 0 ev0 NNNN N N j V 0 O 0 O N N 9 O N CO N 0 LO r p 0 0 0 0 0 u m U a c m E m o a a m V 'O U 7 a- 0 E v E U ra a ji) U U U V t O O o L nit o CC CC CC K 1 j } O 0 0 0 0 = 0 0 0 0 • C y � E `o z A d E E L E U N e) P to O W WwW v 0 (0 C N co. c`! 0 6 0 0 0 N U ry r) o0a LL U A LL U U) O o W O C Z O O 0 0 m U m E LL N❑ J a j 0 0- 00 00 U 0 6 0 0 0 ❑ J a U ❑ 000 co N T.`` 8 0 N d O 0 to U O O O O • u a 0 6 0 0 0 to a• m 0 0 0 0 C 666 0 6 o O 0 0 0 _ r E m _ c N o OOOO C g 0 0 0 0 O a. M M M M L w C• E 0 0 0 0 m y 0 0 0 6 co W t O O' y E 0 c — - LO M LO L0 N• N M M M o y 6666 . 'ZL a E ❑ a — • C • 0 o o 0 N M o 0 (O 0 co in d y a a E r 0 N- N N 0 1- e y 6 0 0 0 r 6 0 0 0 o N 0000 NMI- 0 r m 0 CO o0 a w 6 6 .- c E N N L4)- N 0 NN OO 0N 06666 o o E U C o CO N 'Zr 0 N 0 O c Q o M 'v1 � E 0 0 0 0 t aN, d ❑ N W U v p 0 E v O O m L m o.o.a 0. Z o 0 0 0 m 0 >Tu> > Ti d rn m w,„ca 0000 N N c C } } cc} it N N N ❑ • 7 W U E o z C m cE .c E U — N M O n Cr a s o o it o f/1 U _ a R 0) N C LC a COCO C, d-m E -i N N of E J "- n c c> 0l or o � v) `r u, CO a` • Y o N CO CO W o y 3 LL m n 0 No O 0 Q 1^ 10 `,• (7 r O N _ N O N b W in h 0a N N y y n N N ✓ N y t O O O O K U W H W ._. £0 N O N E O 'V O N N V O N V N O O > N N y h CJ CJ n o © N 0 00) r a 0 a r a rom O M 0 O m d � r act E co N O O) co Ct 6 ` N V CJ cJ OLoO a) O N as `ay C m d EE 0) 6 01 c1. C Ana of vi n` 5 E r n a o n g),5> `O N O N Cl G m ai =• • C .L n 6 01 O O .E n r N O C E 0 N O f0 co co ✓ O N N N j V o 0 0 0 in d 0 N e e 0 0 N 0 0 6 0 0 0 v U C c n E m o a O. E z m 0 v d C 0 d m` E E o E O E N R a ', Tapp d D a a a a z a a a .4))6 m w d m 0 N O O O O O p KKcece >> > >- I N N N N • = 0 C d � E o z )p a E E r E U r N CO Q N K K i V1 O o_n. V N N L N M N N a2 O O O O O mu ry U C 0 2 LL CL • U ' 000 LL U L p) O O) D7 9 L 2 O O 0 0 ry J p t c E O LL d❑ J j 0 0 0 o U p 0 0 0 6 ❑ -J Q U m 000 2• m N 0 O O O O d d p ® O O O ^L❑ U � m m a p O CD O C) N L h m p 0. 0 0 0 � L p N C_ C LL ' y 0 0 0 0 0 8888 p M M M t7 o O• O C S C 0000 m 2 2 6 0 0 6 N y 0. 0 N E C O Nlnhm @ y M M M M p y O O O O O t d a. L . 0 0 o O • M 0 0 o N m m 0 0 u a E 0 r 0 N N O 0 .-. 0000 0000 0000 N M r m L y m O O O N o O J N N v) N 2 - y N 0 0 N r 0 0000 c a E • ❑ U ` C OM m r N O cy o u M E 6000 ry v c J < �. R ❑ N d V D U U E as o.a 2 0 0 0 0 m m > > > > a 0) Cl) 0 v15 v c C E rr r r Y } » 2 ❑ • = d a. 6666 U 0 z 15 m v £ E c L C D � N M V m KKfLK N O a 0. a a --"-na co 0 0 d ry q A E Q c Co N O N Lo- g V m O. > N N(D c • E ° m h o E m v o n o N LL NtoN1- M M 0 0 d 22 " " V K V 0 Q OI M ` O Q Q W O N N CO a 0000 0 N N N 0 M y t O , O O X V W ° W ,� W N O N E 00N N Q Q J V N Q O M O N N h F 0) Q N O 0 h 0 O) y -- a d a ° cdOMb y ^ (O M 0 O a m ° 01 a M o 0 f12 .. O Q C Lg.,.2 cal m 3 m a a 0 0 CO M E m n Et. 3 E L a QOn CO d Q o 0 O NO F <a N N M o v`3ma cc.;• I • v ._ O n 0 C C ^ n vi o G y N 3 E m` y ONOM co o V 0,000 j V 0000 N N O M N.Q Q N Co co 000 m V o 0 0 0 u m O C c co E O a a L m C) v CO CO c w m E E m m` 00000 m 1 n n n n L O o 0 O co > > > > a 0 a OOOO O CCCC 2 V)N N h • Y O y � E O m C m a E E t E V —N M Q is CCCC (0 U a a a a r V CO 0 p N C) N aO O O O q u d U C 0 ° m LL • U A LL U O O C 'p C O d O d Q)O O � 0 III 0 a) E a LL d❑ J R ≥ 0 0 0 0 U x 0 0 0 0 ❑ -J 0 0 00000 ` " 0 0 0 0 U o 0 0 0 a a 4 U d d O O O O a O a I, a a 0 0 0 0 d d d o p = 0 0 0 0 t N d_ `' C LL a y O O O O 0 c 0 0 0 0 C O 0 C 0000 po Z y 0000 a a .c p E u E C.2 h h h h to N M (7 o t7 y Q d O O O O c ❑ a t c a -- • 0 0 0 N (0OO C (2,0 0 (0 a a u p, a E o r o N N 0 p 0 0 0 0 0 or 0000 V l � 0 0 O N CO O) .C 0 0 O0 0 0 n a O c . J ! N N '0 N 0 . y N 0 0 N d 0000 E % 0 0 C COlON O c _ o (0i 'a E O O O y w c P. ❑ m a 0 0 0 v E a O. CL m a o p p p N Z 0 > > > 0 0 x 0 0 I„.) 0 a ❑❑ ❑ J c 2 cc K K C } } } CC 6000 a x ❑ • = d U o C E E E U N M V J A K K t y aaaa co n CO N q Co L b N 'm E CO h D u r o N m 2 > O (n h c • E COJOQ E -07 ON ° a a N LL V a N- og N co.0 ' _ r IO (J m N O m W N CO h m N O a O d y y 0 0 u b b y L W M � W - Co N O N E N V P N 2 C b N V O cJ N Or- O N N h ji W Co CO CO N- il- Cov0 O CO Co O C) Y F b a c CO co m d Y O OO b N c '.1F AD. E to to h 0 moo co b (O V C O F ‘- O �N cot ow. E b CO EE n " (oCo0 eet° o ni ui ` 5 E 0- .c a V o h a ::$10 b N N (D a p a NO n o .`o3mn (y T • ' O h O)r G C h N 0 O J n O E E y a ^ 0 CO CO N 0 h Cj o O o 0 CO •. V M co V v b Co N.0 co co to U 0000 a CO U v c m E m O E' b a L m N 'O U 7 ` N � `v E m o A U m a a a a a d j a cu cp a a a L TT,O O o O > > > > CO wove 0 0 0❑ 2 ttw >Y » 6 o 6 6 • 7-' y 7 E o c m b E t E b r-c;iny N U a a a a v CO C N CO N N > o6666 Z a N U a V C a p LC .2M LL • u c rn o m m 0 2 0 0 o6 a U a E j'- — LL a ❑ J a j O O O O U o6666 0 0 0 ❑ J a 0 ❑ m 600 a Tn V 0000 a U O a a O O O O N E0V a A a a O O O o C 0 N �0 10 a _ L m 2 cv- • it a- 0 O O O O c - 8888 a CO CI (") (") • t O• a E 0000 m 2 26666 0 = a u N- E C O O O O N en MIQMM g26666 o000 a u ❑ a c a �- • 0000 c 2 (N0 000 u a a E ' 0 r 0 N NO ' a 0 0 0 0 g6666 O O O Ul 0000 N M r 0) 7.91ZMWOO 0) a 00 - r C w E Or N N It) N 0 - N N O O N : g6666 C) w❑ a E M C 0 N O O C ^ v 0 r M 'aE o 0 0 0 o : O a � N ❑ d a vDDD 0000 aaa N E a o o O 0 p Z > > > > 0 0 a a a A oo00 E >' >-¢>- > r q r K O O O O x ❑ • U 0 o CA a c L E 2-NMI a th th & f/7 U aaaa d N m r An E „ m n to in- 0 Nn _T CO W • E m = r c n a a c m LL m O O N co W CO .1,1- COON-_ CO d w to"n U K U 2 W " N � 0n 0_ N N O O `^ d m CI N X y N N N N W y o N N E O V O N c- N P 0 N 2. N V O C0 > ` ONNn m CO COJ O 0 co N CO y r r 0 a a m N y W6 O O d a - a E 0 b a in o m Ce a t co, 6P co al N ` Tr N A3ma 0 a m EE m 6 m woo i E E 3 E n P o n P a d d y -too m O h a (Ni O N . a m a T • o _ C E o m o ,- O J N E d o Noo0 m Ln o N N O 0 0 0 0 N d V moo Pa on 000 m5 0 0 0 0 R U C c m E 2 o c a 0 E m a 0 U d 0 a a m E E 0 m d a o a a CO a n n 0. a0 > 0> > > rt d d d ❑ 0 0❑ o K K K K >»> 0 0000 = 0 0 0 0 • = O C y O z c m E E L E U NCO J m KKK K N U a a a • APPENDIX D Historic and Proposed Drainage Area Maps • 0 LARGE MAPS AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING AT THE CLERK TO THE BOARD'S OFFICE, IN THE PUBLIC REVIEW FILE. CD's with Electronic Files Have Been Included With the Original 5 Submittals Town of Mead P.O.Box 626 441 Third Street Mead"A Little Foam Mead,Colorado 80542-0626 with a Big Future- (970)535-4477 CERTIFIED MAIL#7007 1490 0004 3518 9750 August 1, 2008 Weld County Board of Commissioners P.O. Box 758 Greeley, CO 80632 RE: Notice of Public Hearing - High Point in Mead Annexation Planning Commission - 7:00 P.M., Wednesday, August 20, 2008. Gentlemen: Please be advised that a public hearing before the Mead Planning Commission has been set to review and consider the annexation of a portion of Section 35, Township 4 North, Range 68 West of the 6th P.M.. The property is owned by HD Path of Growth Partners, Ltd. and 1-25 and 389 Partners, Ltd., 5953 Dallas Parkway, Suite 200-A, Plano, TX 75093, and is proposed for the development of approximately 1,036 single family medium density units and 400 multi-family high density units. WCR 9 '/2 will act as a buffer separating the residential community from the commercial land uses. The land use to the west of WCR 9 yz and along 1-25 will incorporate approximately 61 acres of commercial as well as 82 acres of mixed use development dedicated for commercial and light industrial use. In accordance with C.R.S. § 31-12-108 (2), this notice has been sent to the Board of County Commissioners and County Attorney for Weld County, and to each special district or school district having territory within the area to be annexed. This notice has also been sent to service providers and those holding a franchise with the Town. Attached is a copy of the published public hearing notice, together with a copy of the applicant's petition for annexation and the adopted resolution finding substantial compliance and initiating annexation proceedings. As one of the Town's referral agencies, you have previously received copies of the"Letter of Intent" provided with the application, maps of the property location and a"concept plan" for the development of the property. Copies of the full application, as well as the full-sized maps submitted with the application are available for review in the Mead Town Hall, 441 - 3`a Street, Mead, Colorado. Written comments may be sent to Dan Dean, Town Manager, Box 626, Mead, CO 80542. Very truly yours, Candace Bridgwater Town Clerk /(3 ti--c.e-up fib' - If -CC� (la fi SG� C' 6^✓k NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING MEAD PLANNING COMMISSION HIGH POINT AT MEAD ANNEXATION NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Board of Trustees of the Town of Mead has adopted a Resolution of Substantial Compliance initiating annexation proceedings for the "High Point at Mead," said Annexation being more particularly described in the following Resolution No. 22-R-2008. The Planning Commission of the Town of Mead will hold a Public Hearing commencing at 7:00 o'clock P.M., Wednesday, August 20, 2008, at the Mead Town Hall, 441 - 3`d Street, Mead, Colorado 80542, for the purpose of reviewing the petition and making a recommendation to the Board of Trustees regarding whether the property proposed to be annexed meets the applicable requirements of the statutes of the State of Colorado and is eligible for annexation to the Town of Mead, and to recommend the appropriate land use for the property, if requested. Any person may appear at the Public Hearing and be heard regarding the matters under consideration. Copies of the petition and supporting material submitted to the Town are on file and available for public inspection in the Office of the Town Clerk, at the Mead Town Hall, 441 - 3`d Street, Mead, Colorado 80542. Dated this 29th day of July 2008. TOWN OF MEAD, COLORADO By: /s/Candace Bridgwater Town Clerk TOWN OF MEAD, COLORADO RESOLUTION NO. 22-R-2008 A RESOLUTION FINDING SUBSTANTIAL COMPLIANCE AND INITIATING ANNEXATION PROCEEDINGS FOR CERTAIN PROPERTIES IN WELD COUNTY, COLORADO TO THE TOWN OF MEAD, SAID ANNEXATION TO BE KNOWN AS THE HIGH POINT AT MEAD ANNEXATION. WHEREAS, a written petition together with four (4) prints of an annexation map for annexation of certain properties have been filed with the Board of Trustees of the Town of Mead by HD Path of Growth Partners, Ltd. and 1-25 and 389 Partners, Ltd., 5953 Dallas Parkway, Suite 200-A, Plano, TX 75093, through the applicant's representative, CH2M HILL, Inc. 9191 South Jamaica Street, Englewood, Colorado 801 12; and WHEREAS, the Board of Trustees has reviewed the petition and supporting material; and WHEREAS, the Board of Trustees wishes to permit simultaneous consideration of the subject property for annexation and zoning, if requested in the petition; and WHEREAS, the Board of Trustees has reviewed the petition and desires to adopt by Resolution its findings in regard to the petition; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF MEAD, COLORADO, as follows: Section 1. The petition, whose legal description is attached hereto as Exhibit A, and incorporated by reference herein, is accepted and determined to be in substantial compliance with the applicable laws of the State of Colorado. Section 2. No election is required under C.R.S. §31-12-107(2). Section 3. No additional terms and conditions are to be imposed except those provided for in the petitions. Section 4. The Board of Trustees will hold a public hearing for the purpose of determining if the proposed annexation complies with C.R.S. §31-12-104, and with C.R.S. §31-12- 105, and will hold a public hearing to determine the appropriate zoning of the subject properties if requested in the petition, at the Mead Town Hall, 441 3`d Street, Mead, Colorado 80542, at the following time and date: 7:00 pm, Monday, September 8, 2008. Section 5. Any person may appear at such hearing and present evidence relative to the proposed annexation or the proposed zoning. w Section 6. Upon completion of the hearing, the Board of Trustees shall set forth, by resolution, its findings and conclusions with reference to the eligibility of the proposed annexation, and whether the statutory requirements for the proposed annexation have been met, and further, will determine the appropriate zoning of the subject property if requested in the petition. Section 7. If the Board of Trustees concludes, by resolution, that all statutory requirements have been met and that the proposed annexation is proper under the laws of the State of Colorado, the Board of Trustees shall pass one or more ordinances annexing the subject property to the Town of Mead, and shall pass one or more ordinances zoning the subject property if requested in the petition. INTRODUCED, READ, PASSED, AND ADOPTED THIS 28'h DAY OF July , 2008. ATTEST: TOWN OF MEAD By /s/ Candace Bridgwater By /s/Richard W. Macomber Candace Bridgwater, Town Clerk Richard W. Macomber, Mayor EXHIBIT A HIGH POINT AT MEAD ANNEXATION Legal Description: A PARCEL OF LAND BEING A PORTION OF SECTION 35 AND A PORTION OF THE SOUTHERLY 30 FEET OF SECTION 26,TOWNSHIP 4 NORTH,RANGE 68 WEST OF THE 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN AND A PORTION OF THE NORTHERLY 30 FEET OF SECTION 2,TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH,RANGE 68 WEST OF THE 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN,COUNTY OF WELD, STATE OF COLORADO,BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: CONSIDERING THE NORTH LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 35 TO BEAR NORTH 88°47'02"EAST BETWEEN TWO FOUND MONUMENTS,THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SECTION 35,A FOUND NO. 6 REBAR WITH 3 ''A INCH ALUMINUM CAP SET IN RANGE BOX STAMPED"MCRAE& SHORT INC. LS 7242, 1994"AND THE NORTH QUARTER CORNER OF SECTION 35,A FOUND NO. 6 REBAR WITH 2 1/2 INCH ALUMINUM CAP STAMPED"TST CONSULTING ENGINEERS, LS 31169, 2001" WITH ALL BEARINGS RELATIVE THERETO: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 35 FROM WHICH THE NORTH QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 35 BEARS SOUTH 89°36'24" WEST A DISTANCE OF 2639.65 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE EASTERN LINE OF SECTION 35, SOUTH 00°18'25"EAST A DISTANCE OF 2646.49 FEET TO THE EAST QUARTER CORNER OF SECTION 35; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID EASTERN LINE, SOUTH 00°17'31"EAST A DISTANCE OF 2056.35 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE FRANK ROMOS PROPERTY SHOWN IN RECEPTION NO. 2204895; THENCE ALONG THE NORTHERN LINE OF SAID ROMOS PROPERTY, SOUTH 88°51'47"WEST A DISTANCE OF 1709.00 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID PROPERTY; THENCE ALONG THE WESTERN LINE OF SAID ROMOS PROPERTY AND THE WESTERLY LINE EXTENDED, SOUTH 00°17'31"EAST A DISTANCE OF 621.05 FEET TO THE SOUTHERN LINE OF A 60' RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR COUNTY ROAD 38; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY,SOUTH 88°51'41"WEST A DISTANCE OF 967.45 FEET; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE, SOUTH 88°53'02"WEST A DISTANCE OF 1870.12 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID SOUTHERN RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE,NORTH 01°18"49"WEST A DISTANCE OF 60.08 FEET TO A SOUTHERN PROPERTY CORNER FOR THE WELD COUNTY WATER DISTRICT AND LITTLE THOMPSON WATER DISTRICT PROPERTY AS DESCRIBED IN RECEPTION NO.2826736; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID WATER DISTRICT PROPERTY,NORTH 88°53'18"EAST A DISTANCE OF 140.39 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID PROPERTY; THENCE ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID WATER DISTRICT PROPERTY,NORTH 01°13'04"WEST A DISTANCE OF 40.09 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID PROPERTY; THENCE ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID WATER DISTRICT PROPERTY, SOUTH 88°53'05"WEST 137.60 FEET; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID NORTH LINE,NORTH 83°15'09"WEST A DISTANCE OF 568.49 FEET TO A NORTHEAST CORNER OF THAT PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN BOOK 1528 AT PAGE 526, ALSO BEING A POINT ON THE EASTERN LINE OF THE RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR FRONTAGE ROAD; THENCE ALONG THE EASTERN LINE OF THAT PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN BOOK 1528 AT 526 AND SAID EASTERN RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE,NORTH 17°04'05"WEST A DISTANCE OF 632.85 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THAT PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN BOOK 1528 AT PAGE 526,ALSO BEING ON THE EASTERN LINE OF THAT PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN BOOK 1041 AT PAGE 278; THENCE ALONG THE EASTERN LINE OF THAT PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN BOOK 1041 AT PAGE 278 AND CONTINUING ALONG THE EASTERN LINE OF SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY,NORTH 00°03'36"EAST A DISTANCE OF 1244.76 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AT&T PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN RECEPTION NO. 1505381; THENCE LEAVING SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY AND ALONG THE SOUTHERN LINE OF SAID AT&T PROPERTY, SOUTH 89°55'39"EAST A DISTANCE OF 989.86 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID PROPERTY; THENCE ALONG THE EASTERN LINE OF SAID AT&T PROPERTY,NORTH 00°04'48"EAST A DISTANCE OF 988.68 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID PROPERTY; THENCE ALONG THE NORTHERN LINE OF SAID AT&T PROPERTY,NORTH 89°51'33"WEST A DISTANCE OF 990.16 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID PROPERTY,ALSO BEING ON THE EASTERN LINE OF THAT PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN BOOK 1041 AT PAGE 278 AND THE EASTERN RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR FRONTAGE ROAD; THENCE ALONG SAID EASTERN RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE,NORTH 00°04'04"EAST A DISTANCE OF 2362.96 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTHERN RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF COUNTY ROAD 40; THENCE ALONG THE NORTHERN LINE OF SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY,NORTH 88°47'02"EAST,A DISTANCE OF 2621.30 FEET; THENCE ALONG SAID NORTHERN RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE,NORTH 89°36'24"EAST,A DISTANCE OF 2639.91 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY, SOUTH 00°18'25"EAST,A DISTANCE OF 30.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. THUS DESCRIBED TRACT CONTAINS 26,174,481 SQUARE FEET OF 600.88 ACRES MORE OR LESS, TOGETHER WITH AND SUBJECT TO ALL EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS-OF-WAY EXISTING AND/OR OF PUBLIC RECORD. HIGH POINT AT MEAD PETITION FOR ANNEXATION TO: THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF MEAD, COLORADO: (We), HD Path of Growth Partners, Ltd. And I-25 and 389 Partners, Ltd. the undersigned landowner in accordance with Colorado law, hereby petition the Town of Mead and its Board of Trustees for annexation to the Town of Mead of the following described unincorporated territory located in the County of Weld and State of Colorado, to-wit: PROPERTY DESCRIPTION THE WEST HALF OF SECTION 35 AND THE SOUTHERLY 30 FEET OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 26, TOWNSHIP 4 NORTH, RANGE 68 WEST OF THE 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN AND THE NORTHERLY 30 FEET OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 2, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 68 WEST OF THE 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, WELD COUNTY, COLORADO. LESS AND EXCEPT PARCELS DESCRIBED AT RECEPTION NO. 1505381, AT BOOK 1041, PAGE 278 AND AT BOOK 1525, PAGE 526, RECORDED AT THE WELD COUNTY CLERK & RECORDER'S OFFICE. AND ALSO THE EAST HALF OF SECTION 35 AND THE SOUTHERLY 30 FEET OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 26, TOWNSHIP 4 NORTH, RANGE 68 WEST OF THE 6113 PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN AND THE NORTHERLY 30 FEET OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 2, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 68 WEST OF THE 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, WELD COUNTY, COLORADO. LESS AND EXCEPT THE EASTERLY 30 FEET OF THE EAST HALF OF SAID SECTION 35, THE EASTERLY 30 FEET OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 2, THE EASTERLY 30 FEET OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 2 AND A PARCEL DESCRIBED AT RECEPTION NO. 02204895, RECORDED AT THE AT THE WELD COUNTY CLERK & RECORDER'S OFFICE. CONTAINING 26,206,407 SQUARE FEET, (601.616 ACRES), MORE OR LESS, TOGETHER WITH AND SUBJECT TO ALL EASEMENTS AND RIGHT OF WAYS EXISTING AND/OR OF PUBLIC RECORD. As part of this petition, your petitioner further states to the Board of Trustees of Mead, Colorado, that: 1. It is desirable and necessary that the territory described above be annexed to the Town of Mead. 2. The requirements of C.R.S. sections 31-12-104 and 31-12-105, as amended, exist or have been met in that: a. Not less than one-sixth of the perimeter of the area proposed to be annexed is contiguous with the Town of Mead or will be contiguous with the Town of Mead within such time as required by 31-12-104. b. A community of interest exists between the area proposed to be annexed and the Town of Mead. c. The area proposed to be annexed is urban or will be urbanized in the near future d. The area proposed to be annexed is integrated with or is capable of being integrated Annexation Petition 1/30/207 1 with the Town of Mead. a No land within the boundary of the territory proposed to be annexed which is held in identical ownership, whether consisting of one tract or parcel of real estate or two or more contiguous tracts or parcels of real estate, has been divided into separate parts or parcels without the written consent of the landowner or landowners thereof, unless such tracts or parcels were separated by a dedicated street, road or other public way. f. No land within the boundary of the area proposed to be annexed which is held in identical ownership, comprises twenty acres or more, and which, together with the buildings and improvements situated thereon has an assessed value in excess of two hundred thousand dollars ($200,000.00)for ad valorem tax purposes for the year next preceding the annexation, has been included within the area proposed to be annexed without the written consent of the landowner or landowners. g. No annexation proceedings have been commenced for any portion of the territory proposed to be annexed for the annexation of such territory to another municipality. h. The annexation of the territory proposed to be annexed will not result in the detachment of area from any school district. i. The annexation of the territory proposed to be annexed will not have the effect of extending the boundary of the Town of Mead more than three miles in any direction from any point of the boundary of the Town of Mead in any one year. j. Prior to completion of the annexation of the territory proposed to be annexed, the Town of Mead will have in place a plan for that area,which generally describes the proposed: Location, character, and extent of streets, subways, bridges, waterways, waterfronts, parkways, playgrounds, squares, parks, aviation fields, other public ways, grounds, open spaces, public utilities, and terminals for water, light, sanitation, transportation, and power to be provided by the Town of Mead; and the proposed land uses for the area; such plan to be updated at least once annually. k. In establishing the boundary of the territory proposed to be annexed, if a portion of a platted street or alley is to be annexed, the entire width of the street or alley has been included within the territory to be annexed. The Town of Mead will not deny reasonable access to any landowners, owners of any easement, or the owners of any franchise adjoining any platted street or alley which is to be annexed to the Town of Mead but is not bounded on both sides by the Town of Mead. 3. The owners of more than fifty percent of the area proposed to be annexed, exclusive of dedicated streets and alleys, have signed this petition and hereby petition for annexation of such territory. 4. Accompanying this petition are four copies of an annexation map containing the information following: a. A written legal description of the boundaries of the area proposed to be annexed; b. A map showing the boundary or the area proposed to be annexed, said map prepared and containing the seal of a registered engineer; c. Within the annexation boundary map, a showing of the location of each ownership tract in unplatted land and, if part or all of the area is platted, the boundaries and the plat numbers of plots or of lots and blocks; Annexation Petition 1/30/207 2 d. Next to the boundary of the area proposed to be annexed, a drawing of the contiguous boundary of the Town of Mead and the contiguous boundary of any other municipality abutting the area proposed to be annexed, and a showing of the dimensions of such contiguous boundaries. 5. Upon the Annexation Ordinance becoming effective, all lands within the area proposed to be annexed will become subject to all ordinances, rules and regulations of the Town of Mead, except for general property taxes of the Town of Mead which shall become effective as the January 1 next ensuing. 6. The zoning classification (land use) requested for the area proposed to be annexed is single family residential, commercial and mixed use in Performance District 1. 7. Petitioners reserve the right to withdraw this Petition and to withdraw their signatures thereon at any time prior to commencement of roll call before the Board of Trustees for the vote upon second[i.e.,final] reading of the annexation ordinance. WHEREFORE, the following petitioner respectfully requests that the Town of Mead, acting through its Board of Trustees,approve the annexation of the area proposed to be annexed. By this acknowledgment, the undersigned hereby certify that the above information is complete and true. (If the applicant is not the owner(s) of the subject property,the owner(s), mortgage and/or lienholder shall also sign the Application.) Owner � � Date: S/21 /243 Owner: Date: 4 L+9 rtiarz b'•FJTi1- Applicant: Date: (attach additional signatures as necessary) STATE OF COLORADO ) SS. COUNTY OF [ ,,,.Y> ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this -2 ' day of 200 by f�r✓,,.:.1 Avensts.Lr( My commission expires: 5pc. c5 _ Witness My hand and official seal. Notary Public VERONICA LUSTER Notary Public { State of Colorado irerentres Annexation Petition 1/30/207 3 Landowner/Petitioner Date Signed Legal Description Mailing Address of Land Owned HD Path of Growth Partners, Ltd. & I-25 and 389 Partners, Ltd. As shown in this petition 14875 Landmark Boulevard, Ste.306 Dallas, Texas 75254 CH2M HILL, Inc. 9191 South Jamaica Street As shown in this petition Englewood, Colorado 80112 Annexation Petition 1/30/207 4 AFFIDAVIT OF CIRCULATOR STATE OF COLORADO ss. COUNTY OF , being first duly sworn upon oath, deposes and says that(he or she)was the circulator of this Petition for Annexation of lands to the Town of Mead, Colorado, consisting of[ ] pages including this page and that each signature hereon was witnessed by your affiant and is the signature of the person whose name it purports to be. Circulator STATE OF COLORADO ) ) SS. COUNTY OF ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 200 by My commission expires: Witness My hand and official seal. Notary Public Mnexat,Dn PBOOUr, 1/301207 5 Town of Mead P.O.Box 626 441 Third Street Mead"A Little Town Mead,Colorado 80542-0626 With a Big Future" (970)535-4477 CERTIFIED MAIL #7007 1490 0004 3519 1586 August 13, 2008 Weld County Board of Commissioners P.O. Box 758 Greeley, CO 80632 RE: Required Annexation Impact Report - High Point Annexation to the Town of Mead. Gentlemen: In accordance with the requirements of C.R.S. § 31-12-108.5, enclosed is a copy of the Annexation Impact Report prepared for the proposed High Point Annexation to the Town of Mead. You have received prior notice of the public hearings before the Planning Commission and the Board of Trustees for this proposal. In the event that you have any questions regarding this Annexation Impact Report, or the proposed annexation, you may contact Richard E. Samson, the Town's Attorney, at(303) 776-1169. Very truly yours, - (k)124.,( t- Candace Bridgwater Town Clerk r Annexation Impact Report High Point Annexation August 13, 2008 Prepared for: Town of Mead P.O. Box 626 Mead, CO 80542 / Table of Contents Page I. Project Description 1 II. Municipal Services 1 III. Special Districts 1 IV. School District Impact 1 V. Exhibits 2 A. Existing Conditions Map and Proposed Land Use Map i Forward: This "annexation impact report" has been prepared pursuant to Section 31-12-108.5 Colorado Revised Statutes, 1986 Repl. Vol. Contained in Appendix "A" is a map depicting the proposed annexation, the existing and proposed public services to the property and the existing and proposed land use for the property. I. Project Description: The property proposed for annexation consists approximately 600 acres and is located east of 1-25 and north of WCR 38. The annexation is contiguous to the Town along its western boundary. It satisfies the 1/6 contiguity with the Town boundaries required by statute. The land proposed to be annexed is owned by HD Path of Growth Partners, Ltd. and 1-25 and 389 Partners, Ltd., 5953 Dallas Parkway, Suite 200-A, Plano, TX 75093, The land is currently zoned A(Agricultural) by Weld County. In conjunction with the proposed annexation, the zoning will change to PUD to allow the development of residential and commercial usesin conformance with the Town's Land Use Code. Adjacent land uses include agriculture, and rural residences on large lots. II. Municipal Services: Municipal services for the High Point Annexation will be provided in the following manner: Electricity Electric services are to be provided by the present supplier, United Power Inc., the electric franchisee for the Town of Mead. Telephone U.S. West Communications. Water Little Thompson Water District. Sanitary Sewer Sewer service will be provided by the Town's sewer system. Fire The site is currently served by the Mountain View Fire Protection District under an IGA between the Town and MVFD. Police Weld County Sheriff, under contract with the Town of Mead. Street Maint. Maintenance of roadways within the annexation will be provided by the Town after construction to Town specifications and acceptance by the Board of Trustees. Financing the municipal services within the area to be annexed is addressed in an annexation agreement between the applicant and the Town of Mead. The annexation agreement is currently under negotiation and is not available at this time. III. Special Districts: The area to be annexed is included within the following special districts: St. Vrain Valley School District Berthoud Fire Protection District Mountain View Fire Protection District Northern Colorado Water Conservancy District St. Vrain - Left Hand Water Conservancy District Little Thompson Water District Weld County Library District Johnstown Reorganize School District RE-5J Thompson Rivers Park and Recreation District Big Thompson Conservation District Longmont Conservation District IV. School District Impact: It is anticipated that the annexation will bring a benefit to the St. Vrain School District RE1J due to the increase in valuation, and will contribute 54 K-12 students to the school system. It is anticipated that the annexation will bring a benefit to the Johnstown School District RE-5J due to the increase in valuation, and will contribute 73 K-12 students to the school system. , V. Exhibits: A. Existing Conditions Map and Proposed Land Use Map - _ - rk nIb.II.”2,N*WIOAI — - . '4 : Y r 4•I E. f? ' 0 I % elL .!-'.- --...=--------7;-:::::"..i,;',... ) I II )9 ,?Dffi E 0 i1'' rT1 a'I 'ii i g:I vg I f l* 4r -0 o Vi' P. w I F. I ..i z ti , I {/Jf r l ye r f i i •Il a - i 1 ,•' Y I i_• i•: _ l.-c,};. •t. : .r _ • !i;�..•. fix,'� $ -.Pr's'. `.S i:.;:i..': !.i�' �,r . _ .`:TysuJwl.?iF .-.yam- -4—'.,r i:' l • ' :. :F:::;;;,-!.:.':;.:1;; 'i-4,...;:::.' Yi Yom•:'..:-:I •'a ''. -. i :f.;1-':::"4':11'r..:-."r:1 t!,-.::.•=1.i Ott rl'ti +Ir:;!_r..F.1171*..''_: ='i' ,>1t!. ;. ;'t•• .'t•..ti,...~ i.tir•no9r1.s I �` ;•:,' :'.;.:•".:.. `r. g k ';',...:.:::.41,.:-.?• i.\:::•:;:::?:.:',..:.4.,..77T . ..-f. _•I I ! 3 • °•_ Asti: _ �� • 4;, III I r �t -. .I ••:`_:: .. • ii'•!.7' - r ICI I I i I I I - �- ";` -::". I' -',-';,. M •' •' t•• . ~ .a. „f r ..,X CHZM ....AAA Ati:t .:R'LlJ.a' '9 •rn.k•N.,*4S LA I-- F 'ii u'A•:-rte:•rty� 1>„uL,:„R,.l..,.•..,, ,_ k i-�. I y nrr. Ye A3 r +I'-.7 Town of Mead I I P.O.Box 626 441 Third Street Mead^A Little Town Mead,Colorado 80542-0626 With a Big Future" (970)535-4477 • CERTIFIED MAIL#7007 1490 0004 3519 1074 August 13, 2008 Weld County Board of Commissioners P.O. Box 758 Greeley, CO 80632 RE: Notice of Public Hearing-High Point Annexation Board of Trustees -7:00 P.M., Monday, September 8, 2008. Gentlemen: Please be advised that a public hearing before the Mead Board of Trustees has been set to review and consider the annexation of the good portion of Section 35,Township 4 North, Range 68 West of the 6th P.M.. The property is owned by HD Path of Growth Partners, Ltd. and 1-25 and 389 Partners, Ltd., 5953 Dallas Parkway, Suite 200-A, Plano, TX 75093. The property is proposed for the development of approximately 1,036 single family medium density units and 400 multi-family high density units. WCR 9 '/ will act as a buffer separating the residential community from the commercial land uses. The land use to the west of WCR 9 Yz and along 1-25 will incorporate approximately 61 acres of commercial as well as 82 acres of mixed use development dedicated for commercial and light industrial use. In accordance with C.R.S. § 31-12-108 (2),this notice has been sent to the Board of County Commissioners and County Attorney for Weld County, and to each special district or school district having territory within the area to be annexed. Attached is a copy of the published public hearing notice, together with a copy of the adopted resolution of intent to annex and the applicant's petition for annexation. You have previously received copies of the"Letter of Intent"provided with the application, and maps of the property location and a "concept plan" for the development of the property. Copies of the full application, as well as the full- sized maps submitted with the application are available for review in the Mead Town Hall, 441 -3`d Street, Mead, Colorado. Written comments may be sent to Dan Dean, Town Manager, Box 626, Mead, CO 80542. Very truly yours, Candace Bridgwater Town Clerk County Notice BOT Hearing.wpd 8/13/08 1046 am I NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING MEAD BOARD OF TRUSTEES HIGH POINT AT MEAD ANNEXATION NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Board of Trustees of the Town of Mead has adopted a Resolution of Substantial Compliance initiating annexation proceedings for the"Highpoint at Mead," said Annexation being more particularly described in the following Resolution No. 22-R-2008. The Board of Trustees of the Town of Mead will hold a Public Hearing commencing at 7:00 o'clock P.M., Monday, September 8, 2008, at the Mead Town Hall, 441 - 3`d Street, Mead, Colorado 80542, for the purpose of determining whether the property proposed to be annexed meet the applicable requirements of the statutes of the State of Colorado and is eligible for annexation to the Town of Mead, and to establish the appropriate land use for the property, if requested. Any person may appear at the Public Hearing and be heard regarding the matters under consideration. Copies of the petition and supporting material submitted to the Town are on file and available for public inspection in the Office of the Town Clerk, at the Mead Town Hall, 441 - 3`d Street, Mead, Colorado 80542. Dated this 29`h day of July, 2008. TOWN OF MEAD, COLORADO By: /s/Candace Bridgwater Town Clerk TOWN OF MEAD, COLORADO RESOLUTION NO. 22-R-2008 A RESOLUTION FINDING SUBSTANTIAL COMPLIANCE AND INITIATING ANNEXATION PROCEEDINGS FOR CERTAIN PROPERTIES IN WELD COUNTY, COLORADO TO THE TOWN OF MEAD, SAID ANNEXATION TO BE KNOWN AS THE HIGH POINT AT MEAD ANNEXATION. WHEREAS, a written petition together with four(4)prints of an annexation map for annexation of certain properties have been filed with the Board of Trustees of the Town of Mead by HD Path of Growth Partners,Ltd. and 1-25 and 389 Partners, Ltd., 5953 Dallas Parkway, Suite 200-A, Plano, TX 75093, through the applicant's representative, CH2M HILL, Inc. 9191 South Jamaica Street, Englewood, Colorado 801 12; and WHEREAS, the Board of Trustees has reviewed the petition and supporting material; and WHEREAS,the Board of Trustees wishes to permit simultaneous consideration of the subject property for annexation and zoning, if requested in the petition; and WHEREAS, the Board of Trustees has reviewed the petition and desires to adopt by Resolution its findings in regard to the petition; NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF MEAD, COLORADO, as follows: Section 1. The petition, whose legal description is attached hereto as Exhibit A, and incorporated by reference herein, is accepted and determined to be in substantial compliance with the applicable laws of the State of Colorado. Section 2. No election is required under C.R.S. §31-12-107(2). Section 3. No additional terms and conditions are to be imposed except those provided for in the petitions. Section 4. The Board of Trustees will hold a public hearing for the purpose of determining if the proposed annexation complies with C.R.S. §31-12-104, and with C.R.S. §31-12-105, and will hold a public hearing to determine the appropriate zoning of the subject properties if requested in the petition, at the Mead Town Hall, 441 3`d Street,Mead, Colorado 80542, at the following time and date: 7:00 pm, Monday, September 8, 2008. Section 5. Any person may appear at such hearing and present evidence relative to the proposed annexation or the proposed zoning. Section 6. Upon completion of the hearing, the Board of Trustees shall set forth, by resolution, its findings and conclusions with reference to the eligibility of the proposed annexation, and whether the statutory requirements for the proposed annexation have been met, and further, will determine the appropriate zoning of the subject property if requested in the petition. Section 7. If the Board of Trustees concludes, by resolution, that all statutory requirements have been met and that the proposed annexation is proper under the laws of the State of Colorado, the Board of Trustees shall pass one or more ordinances annexing the subject property to the Town of Mead, and shall pass one or more ordinances zoning the subject property if requested in the petition. INTRODUCED,READ, PASSED, AND ADOPTED THIS 28th DAY OF July , 2008. ATTEST: TOWN OF MEAD By /s/Candace Bridgwater By /s/Richard W. Macomber Candace Bridgwater, Town Clerk Richard W. Macomber, Mayor EXHIBIT A HIGH POINT AT MEAD ANNEXATION Legal Description: A PARCEL OF LAND BEING A PORTION OF SECTION 35 AND A PORTION OF THE SOUTHERLY 30 FEET OF SECTION 26,TOWNSHIP 4 NORTH,RANGE 68 WEST OF THE 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN AND A PORTION OF THE NORTHERLY 30 FEET OF SECTION 2,TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH,RANGE 68 WEST OF THE 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN,COUNTY OF WELD, STATE OF COLORADO,BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: CONSIDERING THE NORTH LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 35 TO BEAR NORTH 88°47'02"EAST BETWEEN TWO FOUND MONUMENTS,THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SECTION 35,A FOUND NO. 6 REBAR WITH 3 '' INCH ALUMINUM CAP SET IN RANGE BOX STAMPED"MCRAE& SHORT INC. LS 7242, 1994"AND THE NORTH QUARTER CORNER OF SECTION 35,A FOUND NO. 6 REBAR WITH 2 Y2 INCH ALUMINUM CAP STAMPED"TST CONSULTING ENGINEERS,LS 31169, 2001" WITH ALL BEARINGS RELATIVE THERETO: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 35 FROM WHICH THE NORTH QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 35 BEARS SOUTH 89°36'24" WEST A DISTANCE OF 2639.65 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE EASTERN LINE OF SECTION 35, SOUTH 00°1825"EAST A DISTANCE OF 2646.49 FEET TO THE EAST QUARTER CORNER OF SECTION 35; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID EASTERN LINE, SOUTH 00°17'31"EAST A DISTANCE OF 2056.35 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE FRANK ROMOS PROPERTY SHOWN IN RECEPTION NO. 2204895; THENCE ALONG THE NORTHERN LINE OF SAID ROMOS PROPERTY, SOUTH 88°51'47"WEST A DISTANCE OF 1709.00 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID PROPERTY; THENCE ALONG THE WESTERN LINE OF SAID ROMOS PROPERTY AND THE WESTERLY LINE EXTENDED, SOUTH 00°17'31"EAST A DISTANCE OF 621.05 FEET TO THE SOUTHERN LINE OF A 60' RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR COUNTY ROAD 38; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY.SOUTH 88°51'41"WEST A DISTANCE OF 967.45 FEET; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE, SOUTH 88°53'02"WEST A DISTANCE OF 1870.12 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID SOUTHERN RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE,NORTH 01°18"49"WEST A DISTANCE OF 60.08 FEET TO A SOUTHERN PROPERTY CORNER FOR THE WELD COUNTY WATER DISTRICT AND LITTLE THOMPSON WATER DISTRICT PROPERTY AS DESCRIBED IN RECEPTION NO. 2826736; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID WATER DISTRICT PROPERTY,NORTH 88°53'18"EAST A DISTANCE OF 140.39 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID PROPERTY; THENCE ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID WATER DISTRICT PROPERTY,NORTH 01°13'04"WEST A DISTANCE OF 40.09 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID PROPERTY; THENCE ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID WATER DISTRICT PROPERTY, SOUTH 88°53'05"WEST 137.60 FEET; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID NORTH LINE,NORTH 83°15'09"WEST A DISTANCE OF 568.49 FEET TO A NORTHEAST CORNER OF THAT PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN BOOK 1528 AT PAGE 526, ALSO BEING A POINT ON THE EASTERN LINE OF THE RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR FRONTAGE ROAD; THENCE ALONG THE EASTERN LINE OF THAT PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN BOOK 1528 AT 526 AND SAID EASTERN RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE,NORTH 17°04'05"WEST A DISTANCE OF 632.85 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THAT PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN BOOK 1528 AT PAGE 526,ALSO BEING ON THE EASTERN LINE OF THAT PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN BOOK 1041 AT PAGE 278; THENCE ALONG THE EASTERN LINE OF THAT PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN BOOK 1041 AT PAGE 278 AND CONTINUING ALONG THE EASTERN LINE OF SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY,NORTH 00°03'36"EAST A DISTANCE OF 1244.76 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AT&T PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN RECEPTION NO. 1505381; THENCE LEAVING SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY AND ALONG THE SOUTHERN LINE OF SAID AT&T PROPERTY, SOUTH 89°55'39"EAST A DISTANCE OF 989.86 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID PROPERTY; THENCE ALONG THE EASTERN LINE OF SAID AT&T PROPERTY,NORTH 00°04'48"EAST A DISTANCE OF 988.68 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID PROPERTY; THENCE ALONG THE NORTHERN LINE OF SAID AT&T PROPERTY,NORTH 89°51'33"WEST A DISTANCE OF 990.16 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID PROPERTY,ALSO BEING ON THE EASTERN LINE OF THAT PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN BOOK 1041 AT PAGE 278 AND THE EASTERN RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR FRONTAGE ROAD; THENCE ALONG SAID EASTERN RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE,NORTH 00°04'04"EAST A DISTANCE OF 2362.96 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTHERN RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF COUNTY ROAD 40; THENCE ALONG THE NORTHERN LINE OF SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY,NORTH 88°47'02"EAST,A DISTANCE OF 2621.30 FEET; THENCE ALONG SAID NORTHERN RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE,NORTH 89°36'24"EAST,A DISTANCE OF 2639.91 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY, SOUTH 00°18'25"EAST,A DISTANCE OF 30.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. THUS DESCRIBED TRACT CONTAINS 26,174,481 SQUARE FEET OF 600.88 ACRES MORE OR LESS, TOGETHER WITH AND SUBJECT TO ALL EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS-OF-WAY EXISTING AND/OR OF PUBLIC RECORD. HIGH POINT AT MEAD PETITION FOR ANNEXATION TO: THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF MEAD, COLORADO: (We), HD Path of Growth Partners, Ltd. And 1-25 and 389 Partners, Ltd. the undersigned landowner in accordance with Colorado law, hereby petition the Town of Mead and its Board of Trustees for annexation to the Town of Mead of the following described unincorporated territory located in the County of Weld and State of Colorado, to-wit: PROPERTY DESCRIPTION THE WEST HALF OF SECTION 35 AND THE SOUTHERLY 30 FEET OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 26, TOWNSHIP 4 NORTH, RANGE 68 WEST OF THE 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN AND THE NORTHERLY 30 FEET OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 2, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 68 WEST OF THE 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, WELD COUNTY, COLORADO. LESS AND EXCEPT PARCELS DESCRIBED AT RECEPTION NO. 1505381, AT BOOK 1041, PAGE 278 AND AT BOOK 1528, PAGE 526, RECORDED AT THE WELD COUNTY CLERK & RECORDER'S OFFICE. AND ALSO THE EAST HALF OF SECTION 35 AND THE SOUTHERLY 30 FEET OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 26, TOWNSHIP 4 NORTH, RANGE 68 WEST OF THE 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN AND THE NORTHERLY 30 FEET OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 2, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 68 WEST OF THE 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, WELD COUNTY, COLORADO. LESS AND EXCEPT THE EASTERLY 30 FEET OF THE EAST HALF OF SAID SECTION 35, TILE EASTERLY 30 FEET OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 2, THE EASTERLY 30 FEET OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 2 AND A PARCEL DESCRIBED AT RECEPTION NO. 02204895, RECORDED AT THE AT TIE WELD COUNTY CLERK & RECORDER'S OFFICE. CONTAINING 26,206,407 SQUARE FEET, (601.618 ACRES), MORE OR LESS, TOGETHER WITH AND SUBJECT TO ALL EASEMENTS AND RIGHT OF WAYS EXISTING AND/OR OF PUBLIC RECORD. As part of this petition, your petitioner further states to the Board of Trustees of Mead, Colorado, that: 1. It is desirable and necessary that the territory described above be annexed to the Town of Mead. 2. The requirements of C.R.S. sections 31-12-104 and 31-12-105, as amended, exist or have been met in that: a Not less than one-sixth of the perimeter of the area proposed to be annexed is contiguous with the Town of Mead or will be contiguous with the Town of Mead within such time as required by 31-12.104. b. A community of interest exists between the area proposed to be annexed and the Town of Mead. c. The area proposed to be annexed is urban or will be urbanized in the near future d. The area proposed to be annexed is integrated with or is capable of being integrated Annexellon Pelili00 1/30/237 1 with the Town of Mead. a No land within the boundary of the territory proposed to be annexed which is held in identical ownership, whether consisting of one tract or parcel of real estate or two or more contiguous tracts or parcels of real estate, has been divided into separate parts or parcels without the written consent of the landowner or landowners thereof, unless such tracts or parcels were separated by a dedicated street, road or other public way. f. No land within the boundary of the area proposed to be annexed which is held in identical ownership, comprises twenty acres or more, and which, together with the buildings and improvements situated thereon has an assessed value in excess of two hundred thousand dollars ($200,000.00)for ad valorem tax purposes for the year next preceding the annexation, has been included within the area proposed to be annexed without the written consent of the landowner or landowners. g. No annexation proceedings have been commenced for any portion of the territory proposed to be annexed for the annexation of such territory to another municipality. h. The annexation of the territory proposed to be annexed will not result in the detachment of area from any school district. i. The annexation of the territory proposed to be annexed will not have the effect of extending the boundary of the Town of Mead more than three miles in any direction from any point of the boundary of the Town of Mead in any one year. j. Prior to completion of the annexation of the territory proposed to be annexed, the Town of Mead will have in place a plan for that area, which generally describes the proposed: Location, character, and extent of streets, subways, bridges, waterways, waterfronts, parkways, playgrounds, squares, parks, aviation fields, other public ways, grounds, open spaces, public utilities, and terminals for water, light, sanitation, transportation, and power to be provided by the Town of Mead; and the proposed land uses for the area; such plan to be updated at least once annually. k. In establishing the boundary of the territory proposed to be annexed, if a portion of a platted street or alley is to be annexed, the entire width of the street or alley has been included within the territory to be annexed. The Town of Mead will not deny reasonable access to any landowners, owners of any easement, or the owners of any franchise adjoining any platted street or alley which is to be annexed to the Town of Mead but is not bounded on both sides by the Town of Mead. 3. The owners of more than fifty percent of the area proposed to be annexed, exclusive of dedicated streets and alleys, have signed this petition and hereby petition for annexation of such territory. 4. Accompanying this petition are four copies of an annexation map containing the information following: a. A written legal description of the boundaries of the area proposed to be annexed; b. A map showing the boundary or the area proposed to be annexed, said map prepared and containing the seal of a registered engineer; c. Within the annexation boundary map, a showing of the location of each ownership tract in unplatted land and, if part or all of the area is platted, the boundaries and the plat numbers of plots or of lots and blocks; Annexation Petition 1/30207 2 d. Next to the boundary of the area proposed to be annexed, a drawing of the contiguous boundary of the Town of Mead and the contiguous boundary of any other municipality abutting the area proposed to be annexed, and a showing of the dimensions of such contiguous boundaries. 5. Upon the Annexation Ordinance becoming effective, all lands within the area proposed to be annexed will become subject to all ordinances, rules and regulations of the Town of Mead, except for general property taxes of the Town of Mead which shall become effective as the January 1 next ensuing. 6. The zoning classification(land use) requested for the area proposed to be annexed is single family residential, commercial and mixed use in Performance District 1. 7. Petitioners reserve the right to withdraw this Petition and to withdraw their signatures thereon at any time prior to commencement of roll call before the Board of Trustees for the vote upon second Li.e., final]reading of the annexation ordinance. WHEREFORE, the following petitioner respectfully requests that the Town of Mead, acting through its Board of Trustees, approve the annexation of the area proposed to be annexed. By this acknowledgment, the undersigned hereby certify that the above information is complete and true. (If the applicant is not the owner(s)of the subject property,the owner(s), mortgage and/or lienholder shall also sign the Application.) Owner . ",a Dates 2' /0e) 711 aiy+o,� +fyo Ne°s a..re 4 v7r0711-, I Owner 4-toc/ Date: 5721/0 8 cz`�.,n Applicant: Date: (attach additional signatures as necessary) STATE OF COLORADO ) SS. COUNTY OF L.,,,,,,,ee ) 1 The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this <� 'r day of 1�`�• 200 ,( by .1-2)0O,J., Akeen.5fl.,i My commission expires: Vic. /c5 �r {� Witness My hand and official seat a.VVL c., �L4i1 Notary Public VERONICA LUSTER Notary Public State of Colorado isTIPTrPrITIPTrin Annexation Petition 1/30/207 3 Landowner/Petitioner Date Signed Legal Description Mailing Address of Land Owned HD Path of Growth Partners, Ltd. & I-25 and 389 Partners, Ltd. As shown in this petition 14875 Landmark Boulevard, Ste.306 Dallas, Texas 75254 CH2M HILL, Inc. 9191 South Jamaica Street As shown in this petition Englewood, Colorado 80112 Annexation PoWinn 1/30/207 4 AFFIDAVIT OF CIRCULATOR STATE OF COLORADO ss. COUNTY OF , being first duly sworn upon oath, deposes and says that(he or she)was the circulator of this Petition for Annexation of lands to the Town of Mead, Colorado, consisting of[ ] pages including this page and that each signature hereon was witnessed by your affiant and is the signature of the person whose name it purports to be. Circulator STATE OF COLORADO ) SS. COUNTY OF The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 20D by My commission expires: Witness My hand and official seal_ Notary Public Annexation Pea eon 1130/207 5 Hello