The URL can be used to link to this page

Browse Search

Home My WebLink About20080560.tiff MEMORANDUM • f TO: Clerk to the Board 1119 DATE: February 14, 2008 COLORADO FROM: Jacqueline Hatch, Planner SUBJECT: Correction USR-1638 Bartez LLC The Department of Planning Services requests that the description of the application be changed "A Site Specific Development Plan and a Special Review Permit for a Use by Right, an accessory use, or a Use by Special Review in the Commercial or Industrial Zone District (truck parking, maintenance and office) in the A (Agricultural)Zone District." Thank you. IS • x • i Y Esther Gesick te-om: Jacqueline Hatch nt: Friday, February 29, 2008 12:10 PM o: Esther Gesick; Jennifer VanEgdom Subject: FW: need info Esther/Jenny The email below is for USR-1638 which is scheduled for March 4, 2008 before the Board of County Commissioners. Thanks let me know if you have any questions. Jacqueline From: Bethany Salzman Sent: Friday, February 29, 2008 11:04 AM To: BornRegal@aol.com; Jacqueline Hatch Subject: RE: need info I am forwarding your complaint to Jacqueline Hatch, as she is the planner that is processing this USR application. Her phone number is 720-652-4210, Ext 8730 • From: BornRegal@aol.com [mailto:BornRegal@aol.com] Sent: Friday, February 29, 2008 8:08 AM To: Bethany Salzman Subject: need info While browsing thru the website trying to find out information about a development plan that we are highly opposed to across the road from us, i came across your site. And had to point this fact out to you and Weld county. The opening page: Zoning Code Compliance; "to ensure that land use and land development are consistent with adopted codes so that quality of life and property values are maintained for County residents, business and property owners through responses to citizen concerns. " I realize this is not probably your department, but i did have to chuckle to myself when i read the above statement. I am strongly opposed to USR-1638, and have found out that the planning dept. approved this. Quality of life and property values??? If you know the right person to contact on this i would appreciate your help. I have a letter for hearing on March 5th, but would appreciate a phone number to obtain more information. Thankyou, C. Gildea EXHIBIT 1 L se4-14 , Esther Gesick om: BornRegal@aol.com nt: Friday, February 29, 2008 1:54 PM o: Esther Gesick Subject: hearing permit#1638 In regards to the notice I received about the upcoming hearing of permit # 1638, changing the property on rd. 22 to industrial from ag. I sent a protest letter to the planning dept. but seeing that they did approve this, (case # USR-1638) we want to further our protest. After reading the referrals on your web site, i am even more concerned about the decision of Weld county to allow this to happen. Some of our concerns are; What this will do to our home value that we are building across the street. We have put a lot of time, money and work into building a dream home and this will certainly hurt our value. There are several more nice homes recently built in the area. Also the fact that they will have a commercial well permit concerns me, as we are drilling one too and they are very close to us. In one part it mentions them having mobile homes for their employee housing (an eye sore in itself) and they would be on this well too. Another concern is all the reference to the handling of their "waste", and disposal of it. The additional traffic that this business will create, looking like approx. 10% more on road 22. I've researched and cannot find a business already in existence by this name, so am assuming it is a new business, and its not real clear on exactly what type of business this is. While researching your site, i did run across a statement under your zoning code compliance, " to ensure that land use and land development are consistent with adopted codes so that quality of life and property values are maintained for county residents, businesses and property owners through response to citizen concerns. " I cannot see where allowing this industrial business is in the best interest of our properties or owners in e area! s too late for us to sell and find a better location to build our house, but it is not to late for Weld county to not let this happen. I have seen many other fitting sights for this business to be put in weld county besides in the midst of ag. land. Please let me know if it would help if we get a petition signed by homeowners in the area and bring it to the hearing. Thankyou, Carol Gildea 13935 CR 22 303-452-8851 Delicious ideas to please the pickiest eaters. Watch the video on AOL Living. <http://console.mxlogic.com/redir/?mnNPPlEVjjdIIFLT7e9CM0pYzcE4uSF_bUPAxZs9Rc5VRbH7 JfbBGJNbHiIlb5SvNOeS9- _ unl4aQbEdKKBIjKtVcsilwA6xNSRfIGJuXdXTLuZQTPhOYrLRXThjopvd79EVdTdAaNx7OeDwHgDYKr7cLICQkXIc ELcce6QXCOvX6k29Ewm-aIFCy034n6nzs_3 VU3 zg9J4SOOC_ssyyrlldm> • 1 Esther Gesick Orom: Richard Hawley[RHawley@ftlupton.k12.co.us] ent: Wednesday, March 05, 2008 12:29 PM o: Esther Gesick Cc: Don Dunker Subject: RE: Docket#2008-18-TL1952/ USR1638 Greetings, I am sending this because we were apparently omitted from the normal plan review process. Due to the increase in truck traffic that this operation will add to the current high level of truck traffic, the fact we pick up students on the opposite side of this proposed site and there is a hill that obstructs the view of this bus stop for eastbound traffic we are asking that the 45 mile per hour speed limit be extended approximately one half mile further east from its present position. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Dick Hawley Director of Support Services Weld County School district RE-8 South Denver Avenue Fort Lupton, Colorado 80621 Phone: 303-857-7370 Fax: 303-857-7178 • EXHIBIT a U5fl 11(x3$ 1 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS' SIGN POSTING CERTIFICATE • THE LAST DAY TO POST THE SIGN IS February 24, 2008THE SIGN SHALL BE POSTED ADJACENT TO AND VISIBLE FROM A PUBLICALLY MAINTAINED ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY. IN THE EVENT THE PROPERTY BEING CONSIDERED FOR A SPECIAL REVIEW IS NOT ADJACENT TO A PUBLICALLY MAINTAINED ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY, THE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES SHALL POST ONE SIGN IN THE MOST PROMINENT PLACE ON THE PROPERTY AND POST A SECOND SIGN AT THE POINT AT WHICH THE DRIVEWAY (ACCESS DRIVE) INTERSECTS A PUBLICALLY MAINTAINED ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY. I, Hannah Hippely, HEREBY CERTIFY UNDER PENALTIES OF PERJURY THAT THE SIGN WAS POSTED ON THE PROPERTY AT LEAST TEN DAYS BEFORE THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS HEARING FOR USR-1638 IN THE AGRICULTURAL ZONE DISTRICT. Hannah Hippely Name of Person Posting Sign — Hannah Hippely • Signature of Person Pots o .ti g Sig STATE OF COLORADO ) ss. COUNTY OF WELD The foregoing instrument was subscribed and sworn to me thispiay of , 2008. WITNESS my hand and official seal. yI!,vCl; 101 1 N tart' u is ;lci.O% s r,. My Commission Explr ti t5F sft? My Commission Expires: 10-14-2011 • EXHIBIT Ft (As n#1 ,38 fro. t�"1 1 e... !C'1 1- ' .. s:. 14 t '?�'.. •i;,•,:!,,t Nx 4. 'err � {:. w Y.-111r! .. ..14 s Z'f.y. A,,� a :i • i iii, ; ii, s• kiE; .•s:, ,�.,.•'4 ... -:i ,:uF t Elx:. K 'C : r--• , . "- ""9-1-....': '''.:".-:i5!;!.:. • -..... g 4, ," isfili 0 490,ti 111` . . _ • • •••• ••, ... „.. .• I"- if ;;•, '•' vilge , . ,...,..i• : :.: .... :'c01.,() ...,.........„......: •,,,i1,.•• .1..... ,. 4,(..; g. A.„... r lhl '': -.."4:... '4 N.J. -.- ..:!".:- ... • .•:••.. .: . , „ .. ... , . RE A REARING, ,-.... :.g : ::.•. : : .,,_,:•,4 :..,f„,.. COLORADO . ,..•:,„., ,,,:::,,,.„. ik • .. :,.. ," . . . .. .. ... • .• • •....., . : . . . . • . " . . :".......-.- :• ,• .. g .. ._ • . • ,.. ..., .. .:,. ..:.".1-11.....,',..... .„ ,. :.:•., ER N I N G .,,,'::-'-.. ii::::7.,...-„,,, HELD, ' PE.,. . f . BE • .,:ri:!"..._ ..) € . ,- -.,4.„it,i.,t:i ., ..., . . • .. : . •-• t: • . ...• :. • y); 4,,ii •.•..,,...,,i,.,..,,...c.,„• .- ...-•• ..,.. ....:...,,,.. •,,,,• ,.... \1.3 -1- :: .. . . .• ,• • .• •••• P+� • • r € 0 Cf:) , ,A1 T Vii . fE f !! 5r-se'...7-*•:'.. , ...,.....z ..4.!, ......i ..... .1:„..:,,:,,,,:4.,:,,4,1iiiv!, ••• ,•: ;,......:•::••••:.• ••.: •.„•:•• • ••••••:....::•.... ...:.:::::.•,:, .::;.::.::..;:::;:.i::.,,:.:::.,:,,•,,,,,::•.h,0„„!!„::: •:: . ......„ y4> ,r AME 31 •kr•tea. -.e •,,, • , ,•: ,. ,: :;,,,,,.:....,.„......,,.... . -. .. .. • ....„, ,..,,,, .. .,,,,i.....i: i(‘-lvyletici... ce- 1 --'Prt;te-ktiry Pk 444 -4tc x >° .•2t-'‘-'•;,,. �'f REQUEST i•:„ . ,:•.•::..:„.:•. : , ... •..- ,.. : . ............ . ... ................„ ... ..... ..... ... . .. .,., :.,..:... . ... ....... . . . .. . . ... •• •............"" , ,," .....• ,. . :tip terSCR .:,...:. • .. ES ► !.4 CASE NO. rs:: :. ;#414#:, ,Itiq .i. 4-- i. • ;- - F OR MORE IN F 0 R M re INFORMATION ,�≤< ; .. 4L.D '''''COUNTY DEPARTME �1 . „. . ....... . ,„„„„,:„:,..„....... s illtA L,• ,..:, �11 .:• PLANNING SERVICES AT :,.,,, . 9��,•A;.;.,ii,..„,,iiiiillii...... f , 3 (910 )3536100ext . 3540Ig �� s �. ,„,.,..i." . d .k: . ,-„,.: r.f.4‘; •,,;. .< :.-, 4... ...- , -"",-- .'•••••• Pi.i. ,d',,filii ., .... , 4( 'A ' 1.... ''e.,''' , ' . if.1.4,...,,,. w q -i .. .-,% '. , .4. , t 1• :'7777 ( r , }7� , Yr�• �'iF ''" - dd.. dii SI . . • ilk: ..I . # -T-st , leilIti• • 1 I JAIL' S * � -7" x 4 I ` I. t _ ., i 1 _ _ _ "Ilak. `. ..it 'C �' _, - _r__. — 1 1 I 1. re • -time O- • - Imo..- .� _ - 1i •lit•7 `j ' :Z_ a . .. :. F. 1 .I 4 AI ._ t ,_ ..... _... . . _ .. 41111- il _ - am. - -. - _��- li iri EXHIBIT N d a •..ice^ D .`3 S #1 3 t MEMORANDUM up illg l • ^ I TO: Clerk to the Board IIIDc DATE: March 5, 2008 COLORADO FROM: Jacqueline Hatch,Planner III SUBJECT: Correction USR-1638 Bartez LLC The Department of Planning Services requests the following changes Development Standards number 27 The application does not propose any portion of the site to be leased to another party. In the event that a portion of the building is proposed to be leased to another party in the future, the applicant shall submit a copy of the lease agreement and information regarding the proposed use of the leased portion to the Weld County Building Inspection Department, Hudson Fort Lupton Fire Protection District and the Department of Planning Services for review. Based upon the proposed use and/or impacts of the leased portion, the Department of Planning Services may • require an Amended Use by Special Review application. (Department of Planning Services) A new condition of approval under"the plat shall be amended to delineate the following" P. 14 The USR boundary shall be reduced in size so it does not encompass the entire 93 acres. Staff is recommending that the boundary only be limited to the proposed use on the property. (Department of Planning Services) Thank you. • EXHIBIT 1 3 LtSF2 '*lto3 Hello