Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Browse
Search
Address Info: 1150 O Street, P.O. Box 758, Greeley, CO 80632 | Phone:
(970) 400-4225
| Fax: (970) 336-7233 | Email:
egesick@weld.gov
| Official: Esther Gesick -
Clerk to the Board
Privacy Statement and Disclaimer
|
Accessibility and ADA Information
|
Social Media Commenting Policy
Home
My WebLink
About
20083311.tiff
a itc it. C. COLORADO 264 2008-3311 SOCIAL SERVICES Revenue Changes $25,000,000 a ■2008 $20,000,000 ❑2009 $15,000,000 $10,000,000 $5,000,000 - 8 - - $0 Property taxes Federal/State Fund Balance 2009-Revenue Total $25,728,417 (2008' $27,680,814) Fund Balance, Property taxes, $1,700,000, 7% $5,775,000, 22% Federal/State, $18,253,417, 71% 265 SOCIAL SERVICES 2009 Expenditures Total $24,724,150 (2008 $26,500,814) Child Welfare Core Services 43% $10,550,000 1% $250,000 TANF $3,195,00C 13% Administration 18% $4,450,000 Miscellaneous 9% $2,203,000 LEAP $152,00C AND $104,000 0% 1% Day Care 4% $1,085,150 Child Support Admin $2,735,00C 11% $12,000,000 o Expenditure Changes ❑2009 $10,000,000 ■2008 $8,000,000 $6,000,000 $4,000,000 $2,000,000 w N Illi r t.5; $0 r JL t t '/ O, I ado I e P o`aye \a G � CFcy Dai p aa�a GC P . rig 266 SEVEN YEAR TREND Social Services $30 — $25 — . , 4 $20 — yxi F �:: aF (I) k "4 O ax 4.:" i'.@ $ $15 - _ 4 s 4T -454 $10 4. - 4. -`- Ate, S,i $5 - _ - - mac: $0 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 267 SOCIAL SERVICES FUND SUMMARY The former Department of Social Services has merged with the former Division of Human Services, effective June 1, 2008, to form the Weld County Department of Human Services. It is anticipated that this merger, over time, will produce significant productivity improvements and cost savings. The programs administered by the two separate departments will, however, continue to be budgeted under two distinct Funds. The total Social Services Fund budget is $24,724,150. The programs are funded by property tax of $5,775,000, fund balance of $695,733, and state and federal funds of $18,253,417. The Department continues to pursue innovative programs to avoid, or reduce the duration of, clients' need for services. While this drives greater costs in the current year, it is anticipated that these measures will enable the Department to avoid costs in future years. As consumer costs for fuel, utilities, and food continue to rise, and as homeowners face mortgage foreclosure situations, more Weld County citizens are being placed in a position of requiring assistance. Food Assistance, Medicaid, and LEAP caseloads have experienced moderate increases in recent years. The department anticipates growth in OAP over the next decade due to the number of citizens that are reaching retirement age. The Department has increased the amount of resources dedicated to detecting client fraud. The major challenge associated with fraud is the difficulty of establishing the true household composition. The County Contingency Fund,from which Weld County has received approximately$200,000 per year, has been abolished and restructured under the County Tax Base Relief Fund. Weld County is not likely to receive significant revenue from this fund,due to its relatively high assessed property value per capita. The Work-Load Study, conducted by Deloitte Consulting as a contractor for the State, determined that the County Administration appropriation was under-funded, state-wide, by a total of approximately$28 million. The restructuring of the County Contingency appropriation has enabled the State to provide an additional$13.7 million to partially fund this shortfall in State Fiscal Year 2008-09. This increase in funding will provide some level of relief to Weld County in managing the increased costs associated with greater demand for the services we provide. The number of cases and requests for Child Support Establishment and Enforcement continues to grow. The Department continues to use all available collection techniques, enabling total collections to grow at a rate of approximately 5% per year. In mid-year 2008, the Department enacted policy requiring Low-Income Child Care recipients to apply for Child Support Enforcement services. CBMS continues to impact the productivity of staff and create delays in the delivery of payments and benefits for Food Assistance, Medicaid, Colorado Works, and State-Only Programs. Many of the inefficiencies creating these delays are being resolved. However,the inefficiencies that remain continue to impact the time required to process cases and the number of cases in pending status. New legislation enacted in the 2008 Legislative Session placed restrictions on the amount of TANF County Reserve counties are allowed to maintain. Weld County is not currently in danger of forfeiting any of its Reserves, due to this legislation. We are, however, researching means of accessing the funds forfeited by other counties to the State-wide Reserve funds, in order to improve services to clients. 268 Quality day care, at an affordable cost,will continue to be a challenge for working families to obtain. The Department is researching the possibility of increasing the rate paid per child/per day to providers who undergo training and assessment to enhance the quality of the care provided. Other efforts have been, and continue to be, implemented to ensure that funds are being used to provide services to best serve the citizens of Weld County. The demand for Child Welfare services continues to expand in Weld County, as it has throughout the State. The Department is continuing to seek out and encourage the provision of services,with associated costs, early in the involvement with families, in order to avoid the need for more costly services as the involvement continues. Working with the Inter-agency Oversight Group, the Department has moved toward a policy of utilizing local placement options for children, whenever possible,to increase parental involvement and to decrease case-worker travel costs. The need for Supervised Visitations has become a significant issue in recent years. The Department is participating in State-wide discussions regarding the potential of a new method of allocating available Child Welfare appropriations among counties. The current discussion favors a model based on relative desirable outcomes. 269 DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES ESTIMATED REVENUE 2009 FEDERAL AND STATE COUNTY TOTAL County Administration $ 3,560,000 $ 890,000 $ 4,450,000 Other Programs 1,790,000 67,500 1,857,500 Child Support Administration 1,873,100 861,900 2,735,000 TANF - Colorado Works 1,709,917 1,485,083 3,195,000 Aid to the Needy Disabled 0 104,000 104,000 Child Care 575,150 510,000 1,085,150 Old Age Pension 153,250 8,750 162,000 Child Welfare 6,900,000 3,650,000 10,550,000 Core Services 0 250,000 250,000 LEAP 152,000 0 152,000 General Assistance 105,000 78,500 183,500 Sub-Total $ 16,818,417 $ 7,905,733 $ 24,724,150 Federal/State Reimbursement $ 16,818,417 Claims Collection Incentives $ 50,000 TANF Adjustment 850,000 Child Support Incentives 250,000 Use of Deferred Revenues 285,000 Sub-Total Revenue $ 18,253,417 County Property Tax/Penalties $ 5,775,000 Fund Balance Usage $ 695.733 Total Revenue $ 24,724,150 270 DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES MANDATED FEDERAL AND STATE PROGRAMS Assistance Payment Programs: Most assistance payment programs are mandated by the federal or state government. Consequently, local government is limited as to what can be done to reduce costs from these programs. Federally State Mandated Mandated Temporary Assistance to Needy Families X X Aid to the Needy Disabled X X Low Income Energy Assistance X X Old Age Pension X General Assistance* Optional Optional State law allows counties the option of having a general assistance program and, if established, to determine the benefit level. Social Service Programs: Social service programs administered by the department are mandated by federal or state law; however, local governments have a higher degree of managerial flexibility with these programs. Federally State Mandated Mandated Child Protection - Casework Services X X Youth Services - Casework Services X X Administration: Costs associated with administration also include compensation for direct services through caseworkers, technicians and support staff. In addition, overhead such as rent, utilities, travel, supplies, and equipment are funded through administrative allocations. The State establishes administrative allocations and reimburses at various rates depending on the type of expenditure and program. Expenditures greater than allocation are not guaranteed to be reimbursed. Generally, they are at least partially reimbursed through the use of transferred TANF funds, surplus distribution, or Federal pass-thru revenues. 271 SOCIAL SERVICES FUND SUMMARY OF REVENUES 200 2008 2009 2009 2009 Fund Org Acct Account Title Budget Request Recommend Final TAXES 2100 42111 4112 CURRENT PROPERTY TAXES 5,775,000 5,775,000 5,775,000 5,775,00( INTERGOVERNMENTAL 2100 42700 4320 FEDERAL GRANTS 105,000 105,000 105,000 105,00( 2100 42110 4336 REIMBURSEMENTS 6,873,100 3,560,000 3,560,000 3,560,00( 2100 42111 4336 REIMBURSEMENTS 1,675,000 1,435,000 1,435,000 1,435,00( 2100 42115 4336 REIMBURSEMENTS 210,000 1,790,000 1,790,000 1,790,00( 2100 42200 4336 REIMBURSEMENTS 1,772,317 1,873,100 1,873,100 1,873,10( 2100 42365 4336 REIMBURSEMENTS 2,010,417 1,709,917 1,709,917 1,709,917 2100 42375 4336 REIMBURSEMENTS 550,000 575,150 575,150 575,15( 2100 42380 4336 REIMBURSEMENTS 130,000 153,250 153,250 153,25( 2100 42410 4336 REIMBURSEMENTS 6,190,280 6,900,000 6,900,000 6,900,00( 2100 42415 4336 REIMBURSEMENTS 108,000 0 0 2100 42610 4336 REIMBURSEMENTS 181,700 152,000 152,000 152,00( TOTAL INTERGOVERNMENTAL 19,805,814 18,253,417 18,253,417 18,253,411 TOTAL SOCIAL SERVICES FUND 25,580,814 24,028,417 24,028,417 24,028,411 272 SOCIAL SERVICES SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES 2009 2008 2009 2009 2009 Fund Org Expenditure Function Budget Request Recommend Final 42110 ADMINISTRATION-REGULAR 7,752,264 4,450,000 4,450,000 4,450,000 42115 OTHER PROGRAMS 308,500 1,857,500 1,857,500 1,857,500 42200 CHILD SUPPORT ADMINISTRATION 2,645,250 2,735,000 2,735,000 2,735,000 42365 COLORADO WORKS 3,495,500 3,195,000 3,195,000 3,195,000 42370 NEEDY AND DISABLED 86,000 104,000 104,000 104,000 42375 DAY CARE&ADMINISTRATION 1,146,600 1,085,150 1,085,150 1,085,150 42380 OLD AGE PENSION 153,500 162,000 162,000 162,000 42410 CHILD WELFARE&ADMINISTRATION 10,148,000 10,550,000 10,550,000 10,550,000 42415 PLACEMENT ALTERNATIVE CARE 400,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 42610 LEAP ADMINISTRATION&OUTREACH 181,700 152,000 152,000 152,000 42700 GENERAL ASSISTANCE 183,500 183,500 183,500 183,500 TOTAL SOCIAL SERVICES 26.500.814 24,724.150 24,724,150 24.724.150 273 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: SOCIAL SERVICES BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: County Administration -- 2100-42110 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: Expenditures for staff compensation and operations,attributable to Food Assistance, Medicaid, Adult Protection, and Common support programs. The State establishes an allocation that limits the reimbursement for administrative expenditures. ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED FINAL RESOURCES LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 3,082,971 $ 5,952,000 $ 3,200,000 $ 3,200,000 Supplies -312,559 -200,000 -200,000 -200,000 Purchased Services 1,266,153 1,698,764 1,300,000 1,300,000 Fixed Charges -63,618 105,000 0 0 Contra Expense -29,566 -3,500 -50,000 -50,000 Capital 86,675 200,000 200,000 200,000 Gross County Cost $ 4,030,056 $ 7,752,264 $ 4,450,000 $ 4,450,000 Revenue 2,338,014 6,873,100 3,560,000 Net County Cost $ 1,692,042 $ 879,164 $ 890,000 $ 4,450,000 Budget Positions 93 99 104.5 104.5 SUMMARY OF CHANGES: The Work-Load Study, conducted by Deloitte Consulting as a contractor for the State,determined that the County Administration appropriation was under-funded, state-wide, by a total of approximately $28 million. The restructuring of the County Contingency appropriation has enabled the State to provide an additional $13.7 million to partially fund this shortfall in State Fiscal Year 2008-09. This increase in funding will provide some level of relief to Weld County in managing the increased costs associated with greater demand for the services we provide. Many of the productivity issues surrounding the implementation of CBMS have been dealt with. However,the inefficiencies that remain continue to impact the time required to process cases and the number of cases in pending status. Food Assistance and Medicaid caseloads continue to increase. As the economy weakens, more Weld County citizens are being placed in a position of requiring assistance. Unfortunately, this also creates a greater possibility of clients obtaining benefits greater than the amount they are legally eligible to receive. The Department is requesting the addition of five positions in these programs, whose responsibilities will assist in ensuring that the appropriate amount of assistance is provided to each client. The Department is also requesting the addition of one-half Adult Protection Case-Worker position to handle the increased caseload in that program. 274 COUNTY ADMINISTRATION (CONTINUED) 2100-42110 OBJECTIVES: Administer OAP, Food Stamps, Medicaid, Common Support,and Adult Protection. PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Work Outputs Case Load (Average) 15,500 16,000 16,640 Efficiency Measures FTE's per 10,000/capita 3.957 3.750 4.153 Per capita cost $4.29 $3.67 $4.70 Effectiveness Measures(desired results) Error rate below State average 100% 100% 100% Determine eligibility and provide service 100% 100% 100% FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. The additional 5.5 FTE are recommended, based upon workload. BOARD ACTION: Approved as recommended, including the additional 5.5 FTE. 275 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: SOCIAL SERVICES BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Non-Program Revenue -- 2100-42111 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: County Contingency, Fraud, IV-E, TANF Adjustment, and Property Tax. ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED FINAL RESOURCES LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Supplies 0 0 0 0 Purchased Services 0 0 0 0 Fixed Charges 0 0 0 0 Capital 0 _ 0 0 0 Gross County Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Revenue 6,464,576 7,450,000 7,210,000 7,210,000 Net County Cost $ -6,464,576 $ -7,450,000 $ -7,210,000 $ -7,210,000 Budget Positions - - -- - - - - SUMMARY OF CHANGES: Property tax is budgeted at $5,775,000 for 2009. The difference is a combination of special revenue from various department programs. Child Support Federal Incentives are no longer received as a direct revenue, but rather as a reimbursement of expenditures,so they are reflected in Budget Unit 2100-42200. The Child Support TANF-Retained Incentive has been increased from one-half to the full amount of the State Share, estimated at $250,000. The County Contingency appropriation has been abolished, and re-funded as the County Tax Base Relief Fund, from which Weld County will not likely receive revenues. Parental Fee Incentives earned are estimated at$140,000,the TANF Adjustment is$850,000 and the TANF Work Participation Bonus is estimated to be earned at$145,000. Incentives earned as the result of claim collections for Food Assistance, Medicaid, TANF, and State-only Programs are estimated to be $50,000. OBJECTIVES: Track revenue for Social Services Department that is not associated with program expenditures. FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. BOARD ACTION: Approved as recommended. 276 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: SOCIAL SERVICES BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Other Programs -- 2100-42115 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: This budget unit was established for minor or temporary programs for the Department of Social Services. It includes Employment First, Medical Exams, Fraud,Food Stamps Refunds, House Bill 04-1414(IV-E),AFDC Retained Collections,Collaborative Management, and Building Healthy Marriages. ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED FINAL RESOURCES LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 168,936 $ 126,000 $ 683,000 $ 683,000 Supplies 23,852 0 0 0 Purchased Services 19,635 7,500 7,500 7,500 Fixed Charges 1,487,979 175,000 1,167,000 1,167,000 Capital 0 0 0 0 Gross County Cost $ 1,700,402 $ 308,500 $ 1,857,500 $ 1,857,500 Revenue 1,221,194 210,000 1,790,000 1,790,000 Net County Cost $ 479,208 $ 98,500 $ 67,500 $ 67,500 Budget Positions 4.5 4.5 11.5 11.5 SUMMARY OF CHANGES: In 2008, $1.4 million of expenditures and revenues related to the Building Healthy Marriages and Collaborative Management initiatives were funded in the Human Services Fund. In 2009, they have been moved to the Social Services Fund. The Department is requesting the addition of one position, to be assigned to the Fraud Investigations Unit, in order to deal with increased incidences of reported intentional actions leading to overpayment of benefits. The remaining six additional positions represent the six Building Healthy Marriages employees who were re-assigned, during 2008, from the former Division of Human Services to the Department of Human Services, within the Social Services Fund. OBJECTIVES: Employment First is a program to assist clients in obtaining jobs, so the need for food assistance is reduced. Medical Exams is a program that is used to determine the medical condition of clients applying for benefits. Fraud is a program that is designed to detect clients that should not be receiving benefits. Building Healthy Marriages is a federal grant to assist married couples in improving their relationships and providing supportive services, if appropriate. The Collaborative Management initiative is intended to encourage collaboration among agencies in addressing the needs of children at risk of out-of-home placement. HB-1414 replaces the previous IV-E Incentive payments with a reimbursement-based distribution. 277 OTHER PROGRAMS (CONTINUED) 2100-42115 PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Work Outputs Case Load 2,000 2,000 2,000 Efficiency Measures FTE's per 10,000/capita .191 .188 .225 Per capita cost(county support) $0.08 $0.42 $0.44 Effectiveness Measures(desired results) Cases referred to D.A. - conviction rate 90% 90% 90% Assess, register, & serve mandatory food stamp recipients 100% 100% 100% Request medical exams as required 100% 100% 100% FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. The additional position is recommended, along with the transfer of the six positions. BOARD ACTION: Approved as recommended. 278 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: SOCIAL SERVICES BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Child Support Administration - -2100-42200 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: This program is designed to obtain and enforce child and medical support for dependent children to offset part of the TANF and foster care costs. In addition, child support and medical support are enforced for non-TANF clients based on court orders. ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED FINAL RESOURCES LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 1,939,246 $ 2,073,000 $ 2,145,000 $ 2,145,000 Supplies 229,005 100,000 200,000 200,000 Purchased Services 284,757 384,750 300,000 300,000 Fixed Charges 56,289 87,500 90,000 90,000 Contra Expense 0 0 0 0 Capital 0 0 0 0 Gross County Cost $ 2,509,297 $ 2,645,250 $ 2,735,000 $ 2,735,000 Revenue 1,565,373 1,772,318 1,873,100 1,873,100 Net County Cost $ 943,924 $ 872,932 $ 861,900 $ 861,900 Budget Positions 29 29 29 29 SUMMARY OF CHANGES: In mid-year 2008, the Department enacted policy requiring Low-Income Child Care recipients to apply for Child Support Enforcement services. These new cases are being absorbed into the existing caseload without additional staffing in Child Support. Concentration will remain on maintaining a strong level of customer service to manage consumer needs. OBJECTIVES: Obtain child support and medical support payments for TANF and non-welfare households. Child Support collections lower the cost of the TANF Program and help to keep other households self-sufficient. Administrative costs cover compensation for legal technicians, parent locators, and attorney costs. 279 CHILD SUPPORT ADMINISTRATION (CONTINUED) 2100-42200 PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Work Outputs Case Load 6,500 6,500 6,500 Efficiency Measures FTE's per 10,000/capita 1.234 1.208 1.190 Per capita cost(county support) $3.20 $3.64 $3.54 Effectiveness Measures (desired results) Establish Paternity 94% 94% 95% Cases with Court Orders 84% 84% 85% Collection Rate Current Support 61% 61% 62% Cases Paying on Arrears 53% 53% 70% FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. BOARD ACTION: Approved as recommended. 280 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: SOCIAL SERVICES Temporary Assistance to Needy BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Families and Administration (TANF) --2100-42365 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: Assistance payment grants for eligible recipients of the TANF program. This budget unit also has administrative funding for TANF staff and operating costs. ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED FINAL RESOURCES LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 1,244,061 $ 1,726,500 $ 1,400,000 $ 1,400,000 Supplies 90,390 45,000 45,000 45,000 Purchased Services 47,230 64,000 65,000 65,000 Fixed Charges 1,399,148 1,675,000 1,700,000 1,700,000 Contra Expense -27,538 -20,000 -20,000 -20,000 Capital 0 5,000 5,000 5,000 Gross County Cost $ 2,753,291 $ 3,495,500 $ 3,195,000 $ 3,195,000 Revenue 1,744,214 2,010,417 1,709,917 1,709,917 Net County Cost $ 1,009,077 $ 1,485,083 $ 1,485,083 $ 1,485,083 Budget Positions 11 11 11 11 SUMMARY OF CHANGES: No significant changes in this program. CBMS continues to impact the productivity of staff and create delays in the delivery of payments and benefits. Many of the inefficiencies creating these delays are being resolved. New legislation enacted in the 2008 Legislative Session placed restrictions on the amount of Reserve counties are allowed to maintain. Weld County is not currently in danger of forfeiting any of its Reserves, due to this legislation. We are, however, researching means of accessing the funds forfeited by other counties to the State-wide Reserve funds, in order to improve services to clients. OBJECTIVES: Provide assistance payments to eligible recipients of the TANF Program. The average household is comprised of the caretaker mother and two children. Provide employment training, work experience, and job placement for clients. Provide for funding necessary for staff associated with the TANF Program. 281 TANF ADMINISTRATION (CONTINUED) 2100-42365 PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Work Outputs Case Loads (Average) 500 500 520 Efficiency Measures FTE's per 10,000/capita .468 .458 .451 Per capita cost(county support) $6.32 $6.19 $6.09 Effectiveness Measures (desired results) Work participation rate - one parent family 50% 50% 50% Work participation rate - two parent family 90% 90% 90% FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. BOARD ACTION: Approved as recommended. 282 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: SOCIAL SERVICES BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Aid to Needy Disabled -- 2100-42370 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: Assistance grants for eligible disabled and Medicaid benefits for SSI clients. ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED FINAL RESOURCES LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Supplies 0 0 0 0 Fixed Charges 98,973 106,000 144,000 144,000 Contra Account -59,287 -20,000 -40,000 -40,000 Capital 0 0 0 0 Gross County Cost $ 39,686 $ 86,000 $ 104,000 $ 104,000 Revenue 0 0 0 0 Net County Cost $ 39,686 $ 86,000 $ 104,000 $ 104,000 Budget Positions -- -- -- -- SUMMARY OF CHANGES: No significant changes are anticipated for 2009 for this program. OBJECTIVES: This program is designed to provide money grants and Medicaid for eligible disabled clients. Another component of this program serves clients as supplement to their Social Security benefits. 283 AID TO NEEDY DISABLED (CONTINUED) 2100-42370 PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Work Outputs Case Load 2,600 2,600 2,700 Efficiency Measures Per capita cost(county support) $0.32 $0.36 $0.42 Effectiveness Measures(desired results) Establish program eligibility within 60 Days 100% 100% 100% FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. BOARD ACTION: Approved as recommended. 284 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: SOCIAL SERVICES BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Child Care - -2100-42375 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: Provision of day care services for children from TANF and "income eligible" households. ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED FINAL RESOURCES LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 588,333 $ 612,500 $ 634,000 $ 634,000 Supplies 49,418 17,000 51,150 51,150 Purchased Services 23,550 9,500 25,000 25,000 Contra Expense -37,061 0 -50,000 -50,000 Fixed Expense 365,849 507,500 425,000 425,000 Capital 0 0 0 0 Gross County Cost $ 990,089 $ 1,146,500 $ 1,085,150 $ 1,085,150 Revenue 529,825 550,000 575,150 575,150 Net County Cost $ 460,264 $ 596,500 $ 510,000 $ 510,000 Budget Positions 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 SUMMARY OF CHANGES: The Department is researching the possibility of increasing the rate paid per child/per day to providers who undergo training and assessment to enhance the quality of the care provided. In mid-year 2008, the Department enacted a policy requiring Low-Income Child Care recipients apply for Child Support Enforcement services. Other efforts have been, and continue to be, implemented to ensure that funds are being used to provide services to best serve the citizens of Weld County. OBJECTIVES: Purchase of day care services for eligible children. This program also includes services for a small number of"special needs" children when child protection is a concern. The program is available to clients enrolled in the TANF Program. The department pays state rates for payment of day care services for special needs children who are in child protection. 285 CHILD CARE (CONTINUED) 2100-42375 PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Work Outputs Case Load 650 650 675 Efficiency Measures FTE's per 10,000/capita .234 .229 .226 Per capita cost(county support) $2.57 $2.49 $2.10 Effectiveness Measures(desired results) Process applications within 60 days 100% 100% 100% Error rate under 5% 5% 5% FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. BOARD ACTION: Approved as recommended. 286 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: SOCIAL SERVICES BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Old Age Pension - -2100-42380 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: This program provides money payments to eligible seniors who meet income, resource and age tests. Program costs are reimbursed 99.5 percent by the state. Administrative costs are reimbursed 80 percent and are included as part of the Social Services Administrative budget. ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED FINAL RESOURCES LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 129,056 $ 125,000 $ 133,500 $ 133,500 Supplies 18,998 9,000 9,000 9,000 Purchased Services 9,468 11,000 11,000 11,000 Fixed Charges 13,162 10,500 10,500 10,500 Contra Expense -12,908 -2,000 -2,000 -2,000 Gross County Cost $ 157,776 $ 153,500 $ 162,000 $ 162,000 Revenue 139,417 130,000 153,250 153,250 Net County Cost $ 18,359 $ 23,500 $ 8,750 $ 8,750 Budget Positions - - -- - - - - SUMMARY OF CHANGES: No significant changes are anticipated for 2009 for this program. OBJECTIVES: Provide money payments and Medicaid to eligible seniors who qualify by meeting age, resource and income tests. Program costs are reimbursed 100 percent by the state, except for home care allowances where the county contribution is five percent. Administrative costs are reimbursed 80 percent by the state. OAP money payments serve as income supplement to social security payments in many OAP households. 287 OLD AGE PENSION (CONTINUED) 2100-42380 PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Work Outputs Case Load 2,200 2,200 2,300 Efficiency Measures Per capita cost(county support) $0.15 $0.10 $0.05 Effectiveness Measures(desired results) Approve applications within 45 days 100% 100% 100% FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. BOARD ACTION: Approved as recommended. 288 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: SOCIAL SERVICES BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Child Welfare and Administration -- 2100-42410 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: Placement of children in substitute 24-hour care family foster homes, group homes, residential treatment centers, and residential child care facilities. ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED FINAL RESOURCES LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 6,388,603 $ 6,055,000 $ 6,850,000 $ 6,850,000 Supplies 639,829 500,000 700,000 700,000 Purchased Services 900,967 1,043,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 Contra Expenses -194,373 -350,000 -350,000 -350,000 Fixed Charges 1,972,963 2,850,000 2,300,000 2,300,000 Capital 0 50,000 50,000 50,000 Gross County Cost $ 9,707,989 $ 10,148,000 $ 10,550,000 $ 10,550,000 Revenue 6,278,173 6,190,280 6,900,000 6,900,000 Net County Cost $ 3,429,816 $ 3,957,720 $ 3,650,000 $ 3,650,000 Budget Positions 79 89 93 93 SUMMARY OF CHANGES: The demand for Child Welfare services continues to expand in Weld County, as it has throughout the State. The Department is continuing to seek out and encourage the provision of services,with their associated costs, early in the involvement with families, in order to avoid the need for more costly services as the involvement continues. Working with the Inter-agency Oversight Group, the Department has moved toward a policy of utilizing local placement options for children, whenever possible, to increase parental involvement and to decrease case-worker travel costs. The Department is participating in State-wide discussions regarding the potential of a new method of allocating available appropriations among counties. The current discussion favors a model based on relative desirable outcomes. The need for Supervised Visitations has become a significant issue in recent years. The Department has contracted with vendors to supply the staff needed to provide these court-mandated services, at an annual cost of approximately$500,000. The Department is requesting the addition of four positions, including one manager-level position, to provide these services directly, thus allowing us to reduce our dependence on these contracted services. 289 CHILD WELFARE AND ADMINISTRATION (CONTINUED) 2100-42410 OBJECTIVES: Expenditures in this program are for the placement of children into facilities due to abuse or for placement of youth beyond control of their parents. Placements are made in family foster homes, group homes, child placement agencies, and residential child care facilities. Some costs are reduced by the collections from parents and social security. PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Work Outputs Average Case Load 1,100 1,100 1,100 Efficiency Measures FTE's per 10,000/capita 2.362 3.542 3.815 Per capita cost(county support) $15.69 $16.49 $15.59 Effectiveness Measures (desired results) Reduce RTC placement(Average) 90 90 90 FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. The additional four positions that reduce the dependence on contracted services are recommended, and appear cost effective. BOARD ACTION: Approved as recommended, including the additional four positions. 290 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: SOCIAL SERVICES BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Core Services - -2100-42415 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: Program designed to avoid placement of children into the foster care program primarily through counseling and parental education. ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED FINAL RESOURCES LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Supplies 0 0 0 0 Purchased Services 0 0 0 0 Fixed Charges 256,134 400,000 250,000 250,000 Capital 0 0 0 0 Gross County Cost $ 256,134 $ 400,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 Revenue 104,856 0 0 0 Net County Cost $ 151,278 $ 400,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 Budget Positions 3 3 3 3 SUMMARY OF CHANGES: No significant change for this program is anticipated in 2009. Core Services will continue to be used to limit and shorten the number of foster care placements and to meet the demands of the Drug Court and associated programs. OBJECTIVES: This program is designed to provide services such as counseling, day treatment, and education to prevent out-of-home placements. In addition, services are provided to reunite families with children in foster care. A plan is developed on an annual basis and submitted to the State for approval. Cases are monitored to determine the effectiveness of providers and program. 291 CORE SERVICES (CONTINUED) 2100-42415 PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Work Outputs Case Load 150 150 160 Efficiency Measures Per capita cost(county support) $1.19 $1.22 $1.03 Effectiveness Measures(desired results) Amount above allocation 0 0 0 FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. BOARD ACTION: Approved as recommended. 292 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: SOCIAL SERVICES Low Income Energy Assistance Program BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: and Administration --2100-42610/42620 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: Administration of the Low Income Energy Assistance Program. This program is 100 percent federally funded. ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED FINAL RESOURCES LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 125,570 $ 163,500 $ 135,000 $ 135,000 Supplies 1,666 2,000 2,000 2,000 Purchased Services 8,879 16,200 15,000 15,000 Fixed Charges 1,863 0 0 0 Contra Expenses -1,405 0 0 0 Gross County Cost $ 136,573 $ 181,700 $ 152,000 $ 152,000 Revenue 121,125 181,700 152,000 152,000 Net County Cost $ 15,448 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Budget Positions 5 5.5 5.5 5.5 SUMMARY OF CHANGES: No significant changes for this program are anticipated for 2009. OBJECTIVES: These funds are used to administer the Low Income Energy Assistance Program. Eligibility is determined after an application is submitted by clients. Staff are seasonal or temporary. 293 LEAP ADMINISTRATION (CONTINUED) 2100-42610/42620 PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Work Outputs Case Load (End of Program) 4,000 4,500 5,000 Efficiency Measures FTE's per 10,000/capita .213 .229 .225 Per capita cost(county support) $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Effectiveness Measures (desired results) Determine eligibility within 45 days 100% 100% 100% Stay within allocations 100% 100% 100% FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. BOARD ACTION: Approved as recommended. 294 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: SOCIAL SERVICES BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: General Assistance -- 2100-42700 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: Temporary and emergency assistance for applicants for Federal/State categorical assistance programs and help for some medical indigents. Totally funded by County. Expenditures from this program are not covered by TANF, OAP, AND, etc. ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED FINAL RESOURCES LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Supplies 0 0 0 0 Purchased Services 135,626 187,000 187,000 187,000 Contra Expense -62 -3,500 -3,500 -3,500 Capital 0 0 0 0 Gross County Cost $ 135,564 $ 183,500 $ 183,500 $ 183,500 Revenue 0 105,000 105,000 105,000 Net County Cost $ 135,564 $ 78,500 $ 78,500 $ 78,500 Budget Positions -- -- -- - - SUMMARY OF CHANGES: Expenditures for dental, vision, prescriptions, and in-kind services have remained fairly stable over the last few years. The State budget problems have created a stronger need for General Administrative funds. Below is a breakdown of the amounts requested for the different categories under General Assistance: Dental $ 17,000 Vision 22,000 Shelter 40,000 In-Kind 5,000 Prescription 5,000 Burial 78,000 Shelter Care Management 20,000 Refund -3.500 Total $183,500 295 GENERAL ASSISTANCE (CONTINUED) 2100-42700 SUMMARY OF CHANGES (Con't): In 2008, the Board shifted County General Fund dollars to fund the match of the CDOT Transportation Grant in the Human Services Fund, in the amount of $105,000 for Community Services Block Grant(CSBG)funding. The $105,000 was displaced in the Social Services Fund by funding General Assistance with CSBG funds. As a result, the property tax amount for the Social Services Fund was reduced by $105,000, and the property tax for the General Fund was increased by$105,000 to fund this transfer. CSBG funds were added to the Social Services Fund in the amount of$105,000 OBJECTIVES: Provide temporary, emergency assistance for applicants who are recipients of public assistance. Non-mandated and funded 100 percent by the county. PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Work Outputs Case Load excluding shelter(Average) 80 80 80 Efficiency Measures Per capita cost(county support) $0.81 $0.77 $0.75 Effectiveness Measures (desired results) Remain within allocations 100% 100% 100% Shelter nights 2,900 2,900 2,900 FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. BOARD ACTION: Approved as recommended. 296 HEALTH FUND Revenue changes $4,000,000 - rn co M n viln M O $3,500,000 - a- M m M - M O O1 $3,000,000 - - O2008 O 2009 $2,500,000 - - $2,000,000 - -- $1,500,000 . — — O cn 0 0 M O O $1,000,000 - -_--- _ . � o 0 $- O n 49 00 ---,_ 00 O 49 b9 NT 0 $500,000 - cNi ._._._. --- $. . O.... _ .. . - --- E9 ., 49 a, in co 0 r M 49 69 $0 , , - Solid Waste Chg for Federal/State Licenses& Miscellaneous Fund Balance General Fd Trfs Trfs Services Permits 2009 Revenue Total $8,812,531 (2008 $8,847,527) Licenses & Permits, $341,700, 4% _Miscellaneous, Federal/State, $30,500, 0% $3,064,405, 35% Fund Balance, $700,000, 8% Chg for Services, $760,455, 9% Solid Waste Trfs, $325,000, 4°/o General Fd Trfs, $3,590,471, 40% 297 HEALTH FUND 2009 Expenditures Total $8,112,531 (2008 $8,147,527) Health Community Communications, Health Services, $1,108,115, 14% $3,992,124, _ 48% Administration, $215,000, 3% Envirnmental Health Health Services, Preparedness, $2,410,135, $387,057, 5% 30% v. N N $4,500,000 Expenditure Changeso M M $4,000,000 "' 69- $3,500,000 LI) LO $3,000,000 0 ■zoos $2,500,000 ts e N o 200 10 $2,000,000 0 0 $1 ,500,000 $1 ,000,000 0 0 0 0 tri co $500,000 zlit $0 , sr 5 C` 0 5 5 00<4\G0 •c \y4q) \•G�o� 0e�`Ge t�a��5 r �° �° r a ��a� Pad o�F Veit- r<e9 cc0S�a\ G c�`J•�� ��a\` e 0\ 298 SEVEN YEAR TREND Health Subsidy 4T s. 3 fir: --ems .. :! `. N O 2 leek t �; - S 1.5 s _-. _._.. } f try _- -_-. - �. _ati'zirte.. +•: ., _ 4744".� a -" = µ: ms f = . _ rtrir 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 299 PUBLIC HEALTH FUND SUMMARY The 2009 budget for the Weld County Department of Public Health and Environment represents an increase of$651,114 to net county cost over the approved 2008 budget. None of the increase in net county cost for the Department represents actual growth in operations. FTE's are projected to decrease in 2009 to 93.10 from 95.09 approved in the 2008 budget. In preparing the 2009 budget the Department has once again worked diligently to control growth while providing essential public health services to the growing number of residents of Weld County. All of the increase in net county cost to support public health infrastructure is beyond the control of the Department. A total of $292,606 is related to cost-of-living and PERA (Public Employee's Retirement Association) adjustments. The increase of $382,377 in net county cost is due to a decrease in solid waste transfer funds as the result of recent landfill annexations. Taken together, these two components account for nearly all of the increase in net county cost. If the projected increase in allocation of ACS (computer infrastructure)charges of$95,000 is factored in to the Department's budget, then the Department's actual contribution to net county costs from service and program operations is actually negative. With the loss of solid waste transfer funds that were used to support core environmental health services, the Department proposes some additional revenue from fee increases where statutorily allowed and consistent with Weld County Strategic goal #3: "Ensure new growth contributes resources timed to coincide with, and in proportion to, its impact on the infrastructure and support of Weld County." The 2009 budget, as presented, is requested to support achieving strategic goals and priorities, allow for the provision of the ten essential public health services, and enable core public health functions to be fulfilled on behalf of the residents of Weld County. The Administration Services Division's 2009 budget projects a decrease of$267,269 in net county cost(Contra Expense which is allocated as overhead to the other divisions within the Department). This decrease is a result of data processing services being charged to each division directly instead of all fees being charged to the Administration Division. Personnel Services reflects an increase of$28,673 as a result of the proposed cost-of-living salary increase and an increase in the County contribution to PERA. The request for Supplies is projected at a small increase of $400. The $301,342 decrease in Purchased Services is the result of data processing expenses being charged to the individual divisions within the Department. There is a projected 2.3% decrease in revenue from the issuance of certified copies of birth certificates related to an apparent trend of declining numbers of people traveling outside the US;therefore,fewer people who need certified documents for passports. Non-program revenue from per-capita state funding to support essential public health services is increasing by$73,714 in 2009,to a total of$412,171. This increase in per-capital funding is related largely to the growth in Weld County's population. The Health Communication, Education and Planning Division of the Department(formerly known as Health Promotion Section)projects a net increase in county support for its programs of$57,515 when compared to 2008. The Division anticipated the close-out in the latter part of the third quarter of 2008 of an effective five-year grant, Steps to a Healthier Weld, and received approval in its 2008 budget for continued funding of a mission-critical staff position to support county-wide obesity, nutrition and physical activity education programs begun under the Steps Grant. The majority of the projected increase in net county cost for the Division in 2009 is related to support for this position approved in the 2008 budget process. The Division is requesting transition support for an additional 0.5 FTE to the Division's only Office Technician position budgeted in 2008 at 0.5 FTE; 300 this would create a full time Office Technician position. With the retirement of a mission-critical Health Educator in July 2008, the additional Office Technician support will enable the Division to continue to support programs like Drive Smart Weld County. It is anticipated that the Division will receive grant support beginning in the first quarter of 2009 to support this 0.5 FTE expansion. The Division also requests 0.25 FTE addition to the staff of the Abstinence Program, who in 2008 provided as many as 80-90 presentations per month to schools, parents and other interested community groups. No additional county funding is needed to support this expansion. Overall, Division Personnel costs for 2009 decrease by$103,609 and FTE is reduced from 15.0 to 11.75. Supply costs are projected to decrease by$37,201; Purchased Services are projected to decrease by $181,154; and Fixed Charges are anticipated to decrease by $65,705 due to the decrease in FTE and Division operating expenses. The Public Health Services(formerly known as Community Health Services)Division 2009 budget includes a projected increase in net county cost of$146,253. A significant portion of this projected increase is related to cost-of-living adjustments and contributions to PERA. FTE is projected to increase by 1.95 to 45.60 from 43.65 in 2008. Of this increase, 1.45 FTE is related to grant supported programs in which the scope of work called for additional staff. The Division is requesting an addition of 0.5 FTE Office Technician to support Medicaid and CHP+ eligibility activities. The Division projects an increase in volume of eligibility assistance throughout 2009 with the addition of children's presumptive eligibility in 2008 to the historic pregnancy screening programs. Additional Medicaid revenue of$10,624 is anticipated in 2009 from expansion of the eligibility program staff activities; this revenue offsets the county's personnel costs to expand program staff by the 0.5 FTE. The more families who can be assisted in providing adequate documentation for Medicaid and CHP+ eligibility, the more kids who can be connected with community providers for care. Supply costs are projected to decrease by $26,849. Purchased Services expense is anticipated to increase by $236,334 largely related to the increased cost of information technology(e.g.,electronic medical records,system IT infrastructure,maintenance and connectivity). F pen ent of the increase in Purchased Services is related to charges from ACS being alloca -d*e'd• -ctly to the Division and placed in this category rather than under Fixed Charges. A. are , Fixed Charges for 2009 will decrease by$116,234. Revenues are projected to increase by $172,013 for 2009 as a result of the Department being awarded additional federal/state contract funding in a variety of programs, increased Medicaid reimbursement, and increases in fees for clinical services. The Environmental Health Services Division 2009 budget has an increase in net county cost of $489,190 over the 2008 budget. The increase is primarily due to the loss of solid waste funding ($382,377), increased Personnel expenses ($90,039) related to cost-of-living and PERA contribution increases,and the Environmental Health Division's increased proportion of ACS costs. With the exception of the loss of landfill surcharge funding, there are few proposed changes to the Environmental Health Services Division budget from 2008. There is a projected $54,514 increase in Personnel Services. The increase is due primarily to cost-of-living increases ($46,384), PERA ($12,640), and the budgeting of the Weld Wellness program ($30,349) in the Division. A .5 FTE serving Southwest Weld was eliminated ($38,818). In the past, the Division hired temporary personnel to conduct encephalitis surveillance that is now being contracted out resulting in Personnel savings. Consistent with the County's Human Capital Management Program and objectives, the Division has requested a position modification for one mission-critical position as part of the Department's plan to retain exceptional employees;this modification results in additional Personnel expense of approximately$3,500 per year. The Division's Supplies expense is projected to decrease by 5% or $8,331. The reduction is primarily due to contracting out encephalitis monitoring and a more accurate and conservative budget process. The Division projects Purchased Services to increase in 2009 by $136,907. The majority of this increase is due to the 301 budgeting of ACS costs($110,104)in Purchased Services rather than Fixed Charges as had been done in the past. The remainder of the Purchased Services increase is due to the encephalitis surveillance contract and increased anticipated costs in the Household Hazardous Waste program. Revenue generated by the Environmental Health Services Division is expected to decrease by $334,923 (including Contra Expense). The decrease is due to the reduced appropriation of solid waste fees by$382,377. The Division has attempted to offset a portion of the loss of solid waste fees by recovering fees where statutorily authorized. Fee increases in the septic program (increased permit fee),institutions program(increased licensing fees to ambulances and inspection fees to child care facilities),food program(temporary event inspections fee),sludge land application permits, and laboratory(testing fees)should generate approximately$29,925 in 2009. The Public Health Preparedness Division 2009 proposed budget projects an increase in net county cost of $31,870. Sixty-eight percent of this increase is due to Personnel costs related to cost-of-living and PERA contributions. The remainder is due to decreases in grant revenues slightly exceeding decreases in program costs. FTE is projected to remain the same at 2.5. The Department of Public Health and Environment remains challenged by keeping pace with the demand for services as Weld County continues as one of the fastest growing regions of Colorado. In addition, the complexity of the work and the intermittent surges in activity in the area of Public Health(e.g., bioterrorism readiness, disease control and investigation of West Nile virus infection, Pertussis, rabies, Q-fever, influenza, and other communicable diseases endemic to our region, SARS readiness,etc.)create unique staffing issues that add to routine functions. The Department's 2009 budget very conscientiously and modestly anticipates the workload for the coming year and will provide the Department the minimum resources needed to carry out its essential services and core functions in support of Weld County's goals and objectives. 302 PUBLIC HEALTH FUND SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES 2009 2008 2009 2009 2009 Fund Org Expenditure Function Budget Request Recommend Final 2500 41100 ADMINISTRATION 220,000 215,000 215,000 215,000 2520 41210 GENERAL HEALTH EDUCATION 593,339 629,567 629,567 629,567 2520 99900 UNALLOCATED GRANTS 947,396 478,548 478,548 478,548 2530 41300 NURSING 880,396 940,956 940,956 940,956 2530 99900 UNALLOCATED GRANTS 2,670,949 2,915,324 2,915,324 2,915,324 2535 41300 NURSING 122,514 135,844 135,844 135,844 2560 41400 ENVIROMENTAL 2,155,950 2,349,643 2,349,643 2,307.434 2560 99900 UNALLOCATED GRANTS 97,621 99,410 99,410 102,801 2580 41500 PUBLIC HEALTH PREPAREDNESS 67,162 125,976 125,976 125,976 2580 99900 UNALLOCATED GRANTS 392,200 261,081 261,081 261,081 TOTAL PUBLIC HEALTH FUND 8.147,527 8.151,349 8.151.349 8.112.531 303 PUBLIC HEALTH FUND SUMMARY OF REVENUES 200 2008 2009 2009 2009 Fund Org Acct Account Title Budget Request Recommend Final LICENSES&PERMITS 2560 41400 4210 LICENSES 116,400 118,400 118,400 110,80( 2560 41400 4221 PERMITS 205,000 260,500 260,500 230,90( TOTAL LICENSES&PERMITS 321,400 378,900 378,900 341,70( INTERGOVERNMENTAL 2530 41300 4321 MEDICAID 36,900 48,300 48,300 48,30( 2530 99900 4321 MEDICAID 207,547 203,188 203,188 203,18£ 2560 41400 4321 MEDICAID 0 17,800 17,800 17,80( 2530 41300 4322 MEDICARE 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,00( 2530 99900 4322 MEDICARE 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,00( 2530 99900 4336 REIMBURSEMENTS 40,000 42,000 42,000 42,00( 2500 41100 4340 GRANTS 338,457 412,171 412,171 412,17' 2520 99900 4340 GRANTS 999,670 509,535 509,535 509,53: 2530 99900 4340 GRANTS 1,231,477 1,399,825 1,399,825 1,399,82: 2535 41300 4340 GRANTS 83,465 94,659 94,659 94,65c 2560 41400 4340 GRANTS 11,750 12,225 12,225 12,22£ 2560 99900 4340 GRANTS 86,000 80,800 80,800 80,80( 2580 41500 4340 GRANTS 0 6,000 6,000 6,00( 2580 99900 4340 GRANTS 343,077 232,902 232,902 232,9W 2500 41100 4356 COUNTIES 2,939,357 3,587,589 3,587,589 3,590,47' TOTAL INTERGOVERNMENTAL 6,322,700 6,651,994 6,651,994 6,654,87E CHARGE FOR SERVICES 2500 41100 4410 CHARGE FOR SERVICES 220,000 215,000 215,000 215,00( 2530 41300 4410 CHARGE FOR SERVICES 201,350 181,780 181,780 181,78( 2530 99900 4410 CHARGE FOR SERVICES 88,800 88,800 88,800 88,80( 2560 41400 4410 CHARGE FOR SERVICES 269,000 279,375 279,375 274,87: TOTAL CHARGES FOR SERVICES 779,150 764,955 764,955 760,45E MISCELLANEOUS 2560 41400 4510 FINES 0 2,500 2,500 2,50( 2560 41400 4680 OTHER 0 2,000 2,000 2,00( 2530 99900 4690 DONATIONS 15,000 18,000 18,000 18,00( 2560 41400 4730 OTHER FEES 1,900 8,000 8,000 8,00( TOTAL MISCELLANEOUS 16,900 30,500 30,500 30,50( TRANSFER 2560 41400 712700 TRANSFER 707,377 325,000 325,000 325,00( TOTAL PUBLIC HEALTH FUND 8.147,527 8,151,349 8,151,349 8,112,531 304 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENT BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Summary--All Departments - - Fund 2500 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: See individual units. ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED FINAL RESOURCES LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 5,277,386 $ 5,837,681 $ 6,099,432 $ 6,063,907 Supplies 433,445 516,429 418,498 418,398 Purchased Services 1,584,026 1,778,667 1,628,673 1,625,480 Fixed Charges 468,106 937,229 649,554 649,554 Contra Expense -464,247 -922,479 -644,808 -644,808 Capital 22,971 0 0 0 Gross County Cost $ 7,321,687 $ 8,147,527 $ 8,151,349 $ 8,112,531 Revenue 5,162,713 5,208,170 4,563,760 4,522,060 Net County Cost $ 2,158,974 $ 2,939,357 $ 3,587,589 $ 3,590,471 Budget Positions 93.34 95.09 93.60 93.60 SUMMARY OF CHANGES: See individual budget units. OBJECTIVES: 1)To provide preventive health care services to the citizens of Weld County; 2)To monitor and protect the environment of Weld County;3)To provide surveillance of and intervention in developing health problems within the population of Weld County; and 4)To develop programs that address the major public health issues within the county. 305 HEALTH FUND SUMMARY (CONTINUED) FUND 2500 PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Work Outputs See individual budget units Efficiency Measures FTE's per 10,000/capita 3.89 4.07 3.84 Per capita cost(county support) $10.52 $12.59 $14.73 Effectiveness Measures (desired results) See individual budget units FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: See individual budget units. BOARD ACTION: See individual budget units. 306 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENT BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Non-Program Revenue -- 2500-41100 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: Non-program revenues from the State per capita health funds. ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED FINAL RESOURCES LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY Personnel Services Supplies Purchased Services Gross County Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Revenue 309,785 338,457 412,171 412,171 Net County Cost $ -304_785 $ -338,457 $ -419.171 $ -417 171 SUMMARY OF CHANGES:The State appropriation for per capita funding increased $73,714. FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. BOARD ACTION: Approved as recommended. 307 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENT BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Administration Services - - 2500-41100 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: Overall administration of Department of Public Health and Environment,including personnel,fiscal management,data and records management,procurement and facilities management. The Executive Director is the official registrar of vital statistics for Weld County. Records of births and deaths that occur in Weld County are kept and certified copies are available upon request from the deputy registrars. ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED FINAL RESOURCES LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 507,900 $ 552,903 $ 581,576 $ 581,576 Supplies 23,614 16,550 16,950 16,950 Purchased Services 477,855 480,360 179,018 179,018 Fixed Charges 0 0 0 0 Contra Expense -424,083 -829,813 -562,544 -562,544 Capital 0 0 0 0 Gross County Cost $ 585,286 $ 220,000 $ 215,000 $ 215,000 Revenue 206,525 220,000 215,000 215,000 Net County Cost $ 378,761 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Budget Positions 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 SUMMARY OF CHANGES: The Administration Services Division's proposed 2009 budget is showing a decrease of $267,269 in net county cost (Contra Expense which is allocated as overhead to the other divisions within the Department). This decrease is a result of data processing services being charged to each division directly instead of all fees being charged to the Administration Division. Personnel Services reflects an increase of $28,673 as a result of the proposed cost-of-living salary increase and an increase in the County contribution to PERA(Public Employee's Retirement Association). The request for Supplies is projected at a small increase of $400. The $301,342 decrease in Purchased Services is the result of data processing expenses being charged to the individual divisions within the department. There is a 2.3%projected decrease in revenue from the issuance of certified copies of birth and death certificates, as the number of people requesting birth certificates for travel outside of the US appears to be declining. 308 HEALTH ADMINISTRATION (CONTINUED) 2500-41100 OBJECTIVES: 1) Certify death records and home birth records for events that occur in Weld County; 2)Issue birth and death certificates and provide assistance to the public in obtaining these records; 3) Promote effective and efficient delivery of services to the community by providing fiscal and managerial support to the Environmental Health and Public Health Services Divisions. PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Work Outputs Birth/ Death Certificates issued 18,636 19,000 19,500 Efficiency Measures FTE's per 10,000/capita .35 .34 .33 Per capita cost $3.58 $3.56 $2.31 Effectiveness Measures(desired results) Increased number of certified copies of birth and death records issued. Increased collection of Medicaid and self pay revenue for clinic services. FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. BOARD ACTION:Approved as recommended. 309 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENT BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Health Communication Section -- 2520-41210 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: Health Communication, Education and Planning includes grant funded and county funded health promotion/prevention programs that provide resources and expertise for the department and the community. The Health Communication team serves as the liaison with the local TV/radio/newspaper media for the health department. They plan,develop and disseminate emergency communication and educational materials to the public. The Health Promotion Team provides support internally for producing educational materials, reports, and local health data. Health Communication partners with the community in developing and implementing programs to promote healthy behaviors. Programs include traffic safety and prevention of unintentional injuries, nutrition and fitness programs, diabetes and asthma prevention, cancer prevention, tobacco use prevention, and abstinence education for prevention of teen sex, unintended pregnancy and STI/HIV. Coalitions such as Drive Smart Weld County, the Diabetes Coalition, Steps Consortium, the Women's Health Consortium, and the Tobacco Coalition provide support to the department to address these important health issues in Weld County. ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED FINAL RESOURCES LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 796,746 $ 899,501 $ 795,892 $ 795,892 Supplies 70,719 90,985 53,784 53,784 Purchased Services 388,577 421,039 239,525 239,525 Fixed Charges 33,241 142,923 77,218 77,218 Contra Expense 0 -13,713 -58,304 -58,304 Gross County Cost $ 1,289,283 $ 1,540,735 $ 1,108,115 $ 1,108,115 Revenue 1,088,389 999,670 509,535 509,535 Net County Cost $ 200,894 $ 541,065 $ 598,580 $ 598,580 Budget Positions 14.50 15.00 11.75 11.75 SUMMARY OF CHANGES: Personnel costs decrease by$103,609 and FTE's decrease from 15.0 to 11.75 when the Steps Grant ends in September, 2008. New funding from the MCH grant (CDPHE)will cover part of the county funded FTE for activities related to injury prevention. A new grant(cardiovascular disease prevention from CDPHE)replaces the Diabetes Disparities grant and will fund existing FTE. The BT planner, (.5 FTE), will transfer to HCEP from Environmental Health. 310 HEALTH COMMUNICATION SECTION (CONTINUED) 2520-41210 SUMMARY OF CHANGES (CONTINUED): FTE's for the Abstinence Program will increase by .25 Health Communication Specialist I. The increase in salary dollars are offset by a decrease in contract services for the program. The Women's Wellness Connection funding for community outreach ended July 1, 2008, eliminating 1.0 FTE. The.5 FTE Weld County Wellness Program Coordinator has transferred to Environmental Health. Supplies decreased by $37,201. Purchased Services decreased by $181,154. Fixed Charges decreased by$65,705. In Contra Expenses the transfer of BT funding offsets the planner's salary. Revenue decreased by $490,135 with the end of the Steps (HHS)grant in September, 2008 and the Women's Wellness Connection Outreach grant. OBJECTIVES: 1) Identify and implement the best practices for health promotion and disease prevention through population based programs that promote positive human development,behavior change and improved health outcomes for the community;2)Partner with community agencies and schools to implement programs that address identified health issues in Weld County, including tobacco use, abstinence from teen sex, pregnancy and HIV/STI prevention, traffic safety and unintentional injuries,cancer,diabetes, asthma and other chronic disease prevention,and nutrition and fitness education for youth and adults; and 3) Provide accurate and timely communication to the public as the liaison with the media, CDPHE and other local agencies for health information, communicable disease prevention, and emergency preparedness and response. PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Work Outputs Number of adults/youth reached through media releases and program /event participation 3,500,000 4,000,000 5,000,000 Efficiency Measures FTE's per 10,000/capita .64 .642 .48 Per capita cost(county support) $1.92 $2.32 $2.46 Effectiveness Measures (desired results) Reduction in motor vehicle fatalities. 48 45 45 Reduction in teen birth rate for 10-17 yr olds 34.5/1000 33.2/1000 32.0/1000 Reduction in number of adults 18 and over who are obese 27% 20% 26% Smoking rates among adults in Weld County 17% 15% 15% 311 HEALTH COMMUNICA HON SECTION (CONTINUED) 2520-41210 FINANCE/ADMINISTRATIONRECOMMENDATION: The Division is requesting transition support for an additional 0.5 FTE to the Division's only Office Technician position budgeted in 2008 at 0.5 FTE; this would create a 1.0 FTE Office Technician position for the Division. With the retirement of a mission-critical Health Educator in July 2008, the additional Office Technician support will enable the Division to continue to support programs like Drive Smart Weld County. It is anticipated that the Division will receive grant support beginning in the first quarter of 2009 to support this 0.5 FTE expansion. The Division has also requested an additional 0.25 FTE to the staff of the Abstinence Program, which provided as many as 80-90 presentations per month to schools, parents and other interested community groups in 2008. No additional county funding is needed to support this expansion. Both positions are recommended. Policy issue. BOARD ACTION: Approved as recommended. 312 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENT BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Community Health Services --2530-41300 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: Holds clinics for immunizations, family planning, international travel health, and Tuberculosis. Provides immunizations, screening, counseling, communicable disease surveillance, containment, treatment, and teaching. Provides home visits for health promotion, evaluation, health assessment, and community activities. ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED FINAL RESOURCES LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 2,315,384 $ 2,552,731 $ 2,777,745 $ 2,777,745 Supplies 135,540 189,633 162,784 162,784 Purchased Services 424,357 510,938 747,272 747,272 Fixed Charges 226,247 420,557 304,323 304,323 Capital 0 0 0 0 Gross County Cost $ 3,101,528 $ 3,673,859 $ 3,992,124 $ 3,992,124 Revenue 1,661,373 1,909,539 2,081,552 2,081,552 Net County Cost $ 1,440,155 $ 1,764,320 $ 1,910,572 $ 1,910,572 Budget Positions 44.90 43.65 45.60 45.60 SUMMARY OF CHANGES: There was an increase of 1.95 FTE due to additional funds for programs and request of a .5 FTE Office Technician for increased capacity to provide Presumptive Eligibility for Medicaid, an increase in salaries and benefits by $225,015 to cover cost of living increases and new positions. Supplies decreased $26,849 due to completion of IT infrastructure, AED's and need for clinical supplies. Purchased Services increased $236,334 to cover costs of Information Technology and the Electronic Medical Records Systems. Fixed Charges decreased$116,234 due to ACS charges being removed from overhead and placed in Purchased Services. Revenues increased $172,013, which is attributed to the majority of contracts being increased, Medicaid reimbursement rates, and fees for services. OBJECTIVES: 1) To provide preventive and protective health services to the residents of Weld County. 2) Continue program evaluation and on-going analysis of cost effective methods of providing health services. 313 COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES (CONTINUED) 2530-41300 PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Work Outputs Clients served 11,500 15,000 15,000 Efficiency Measures FTE's per 10,000/capita 1.77 1.87 1.87 Per capita cost(county support) $6.36 $7.56 $7.84 Immunizations given 7,000 8,000 7,500 Family Services 1,500 1,800 2,500 Effectiveness Measures (desired results) Fewer unintended pregnancies Increased access to prenatal care in the first trimester Evaluate barriers to accessing health care Ensure provision of immunizations and emergency response according to state law FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: The Division has requested an addition of 0.5 FTE Office Technician to support Medicaid and CHP+eligibility activities. The Division projects an increase in volume of eligibility assistance throughout 2009 with the addition of children's presumptive eligibility in 2008 to the historic pregnancy screening programs. Additional Medicaid revenue of$10,624 is anticipated in 2009 from expansion of the eligibility program staff activities; this revenue offsets the county's personnel costs to expand program staff by the 0.5 FTE. The more families who can be assisted in providing adequate documentation for Medicaid and CHP+ eligibility the more kids who can be connected with community providers for care. Recommend approval. Policy issue. BOARD ACTION: Approved as recommended. The additional 0.5 FTE Office Technician was approved for support of the Medicaid and CHP+ eligibility activities. 314 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENT BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Environmental Health Services --2560-41400 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: The primary mission of the division is to protect and perpetuate the public health of the citizens of the county with scientific risk assessments, the development of policies, monitoring and inspections, consultation, and the enforcement of regulations designed to protect food, water, and air supplies. Services include technical assistance and consultation, monitoring and sampling, inspection and enforcement, education and planning activities. The laboratory's purpose is to process medical and water samples and aid in the evaluation of potential agents of bioterrorism events. ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED FINAL RESOURCES LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 1,516,256 $ 1,644,851 $ 1,734,890 $ 1,699,366 Supplies 170,402 172,961 164,630 164,530 Purchased Services 242,284 267,450 404,169 400,976 Fixed Charges 157,029 247,262 169,223 169,223 Contra Expense -40,164 -78,853 -23,960 -23,960 Capital 22,971 0 0 0 Gross County Cost $ 2,068,778 $ 2,253,671 $ 2,448,952 $ 2,410,135 Revenue 1,559,255 1,397,427 1,106,600 1,064,900 Net County Cost $ 509,523 $ 856,244 $ 1,342,352 $ 1,345,235 Budget Positions 25.45 25.45 25.75 25.25 SUMMARY OF CHANGES: With the exception of the loss of landfill surcharge funding, there are very few proposed changes to the Environmental Health Services (EHS) Division budget. There is a $90,039 increase in Personnel Services. The increase is due primarily to cost-of-living increases ($69,866), and the budgeting of the Weld Wellness program ($30,349) in the Division. In the past, the Division hired temporary personnel to conduct encephalitis surveillance that is now being contracted out resulting in Personnel savings. The Division has requested a position modification which amounts to approximately$3,541/year as part of our plan to retain exceptional employees. Supplies decreased by 5% or $8,331. The reduction is primarily due to contracting out the encephalitis monitoring contract and a more accurate and conservative budget process. Purchased Services has increased by $136,719. The majority of this increase is due to budgeting of ACS costs($110,104)in Purchased Services rather than Fixed Charges as had been done in the past. The remainder of the Purchased Services increase is due to the encephalitis surveillance contract and increased anticipated costs in the Household Hazardous Waste program. 315 ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SERVICES (CONTINUED) 2560-41400 SUMMARY OF CHARGES (Con't): Revenue generated by the Environmental Health Services Division is expected to decrease by $290,827 (considering Contra Expense as part of revenue). The decrease is due to the reduced appropriation of solid waste fees by$382,377. The Division has attempted to offset a portion of the loss of solid waste fees by recovering fees where statutorily authorized. Fee increases in the septic program(increased permit fee), institutions program (increased licensing fees to ambulances and inspection fees to child care facilities), food program (temporary event inspections fee), and laboratory(testing fees) should generate approximately$71,625 in 2009. The Environmental Health Services Division's net county cost has increased by$486,308 over the current year. The increase is primarily due to the loss of solid waste funding($382,377), increased Personnel expenses($90,039)as described above,and the Divisions increased proportion of ACS costs. OBJECTIVES: 1) Assist in protecting the public's health from new, emerging, and existing communicable diseases; 2) Expand and maintain community partnerships to maximize resources for solutions to public health issues;3) Attempt to minimize conflicts and the impact of development of rural areas through planning, communication, and service; 4) Strive to appropriately manage natural resources such as water, air, and raw products and their by-products/wastes; 5) Through communication and education, increase public awareness of issues that impact the health and safety of the community and individual; 6) Be prepared to respond appropriately to emergency situations; 7) Assess the community's health status to identify resources, barriers, and unmet needs; and 8) Recruit, support, and retain required levels of qualified staff to have a positive impact in our ability to provide quality customer services, meet program requirements, and reduce errors. PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Work Outputs Food inspections, activities, complaints 2,345 2,400 2,500 Laboratory analyses 25,110 25,150 25,150 Household Hazardous Waste Disposed (#'s) 407,727 425,000 430,000 Environmental Planning Reviews 339 350 275 I.S.D.S. Inspection, activities, complaints 370 380 390 Waste Inspections, activities, complaints 174 185 200 Biosolids Inspections, activities, complaints 148 155 160 316 ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SERVICES (CONTINUED) 2560-41400 PERFORMANCE MEASURES (Continued) ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Efficiency Measures FTE's per 10,000/capita 1.12 1.11 1.06 Per capita cost(county support) $2.25 $3.67 $5.68 Effectiveness Measures (desired results) Reduced illnesses from communicable diseases Minimized environmental impacts from waste disposal and waste facilities Improved water quality Appropriate response to environmental or public health emergencies Improved air quality Reduced environmental impacts from development FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Consistent with the County's Human Capital Management program and objectives, the Division has requested a position modification for one mission-critical position as part of the Department's plan to retain exceptional employees; this modification results in the additional Personnel expense of approximately $3,500 per year. Recommend approval. The fee increases are recommended. It was anticipated last year that the General Fund subsidy would have to be increased in 2009 to cover the loss of Solid Waste fees due to the annexation of the Erie landfill. BOARD ACTION:The Board approved the upgrade of the requested position and all other expense items. The Board also approved the fee increases for the laboratory ($7,100), STD testing ($5,325), and sludge land application permits ($17,500), but did not approve the fee increases for child care centers($4,500),septic permits($47,100),food program for temporary permits($5,000) and ambulance licenses ($2,600). As a result, revenues were reduced $41,700, and the County General Fund subsidy was increased by$41,700. The Board decided to reduce the service level in the Southwest Weld Administrative Office due to the lack of activity. As a result, a 0.5 FTE of an Environmental Specialist position was eliminated ($35,524). 317 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENT BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Public Health Preparedness -- 2580-41500 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: Public Health Preparedness utilizes grants and county funding to enhance the ambient level of emergency preparedness, both internally(county organization)and externally(constituents). This unit is charged with preparing for, and responding to, incidents and events,which threaten the quality and quantity of life within the purview of health and environment; develops exercises and evaluates various plans, procedures and protocols associated with emergency preparedness; is assigned disease investigation duties and functions, along with regional bioterrorism laboratory duties and functions;houses the countywide Health Alert Network, communications and warning operations; and is engaged in local, regional, state and national collaborative efforts associated with these disciplines. ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED FINAL RESOURCES LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 141,100 $ 187,695 $ 209,328 $ 209,328 Supplies 33,170 46,300 20,350 20,350 Purchased Services 50,954 98,800 58,689 58,689 Fixed Charges 51,589 126,487 98,690 98,690 Contra Expense 0 0 0 0 Capital 0 0 0 0 Gross County Cost $ 276,813 $ 459,282 $ 387,057 $ 387,057 Revenue 337,386 343,077 238,902 238,902 Net County Cost $ -60,573 $ 116,205 $ 148,155 $ 148,155 Budget Positions 0 2.5 2.5 2.5 SUMMARY OF CHANGES: The Public Health Preparedness Division 2009 proposed budget projects an increase in net county cost of $31,950. $8,154 is due to Personnel costs related to cost-of-living and PERA contributions. The remainder is due to decreases in grant revenues slightly exceeding decreases in program costs. FTE is projected to remain the same at 2.5. OBJECTIVES: Continue to develop and enhance the ambient level of emergency preparedness within the Weld County Department of Public Health and Environment, while collaterally seeking to mitigate the adverse, or negative ramifications of a system compromise to external customers and constituents. 318 PUBLIC HEALTH PREPAREDNESS (CONTINUED) 2580-41500 PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Efficiency Measures FTE's per 10,000 capita .083 .11 .10 Per capita cost(county support) ($.27) $0.50 $.61 Effectiveness Measures (desired results) Enhance ambient level of community preparedness. Subject matter is difficult to quantify, for example, would each day in which no significant loss of life/property occurred count as a save of the prevailing assessed value within the county? FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. BOARD ACTION: Approved as recommended. 319 Ofcti: 1111111e COLORADO SEVEN YEAR TREND Human Services $18 $16 -.--a--, $14 $12 - %-s is -- m F ,tea. co $10 Z Assn, a_J ._Y. 4 —I x -' _� $6 4 d y - tE — v =i $4 7 a2_ + _- 7 - S7' $2 to $0 { ,-- x- --,- 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 321 HUMAN SERVICES FUND SUMMARY The Human Services Fund for 2009 is projected to decrease by $1,570,351, or 9.8%, for a total of $14,405,966. The main change in revenue is the transfer of the Building Healthy Marriages Grant ($833,335) to the Social Services Fund, the relinquishment of Migrant Head Start on the Western Slope ($810,842), and contracting out the transportation function to the City of Greeley ($571,504). Otherwise, the programs would be up $646,410. Increases are in Area Agency on Aging ($266,680), Head Start($104,557), Job programs ($96,377), and CSBG ($115,140). Being totally reliant upon state and federal funding sources, Human Services continues to operate in an environment of uncertainty. The Human Services Fund budget has been constructed based upon the best available information on the funding levels. It is very likely that many of the amounts will be changed between now and the actual execution of the 2009 budget. The primary programs of Human Services are associated with the Workforce Investment Act(W IA) funded under the Department of Labor, Employment and Training Administration. This program is anticipating $2,730,115 for 2009. In addition, the Job Service contract will be $780,000, and Temporary Assistance to Needy Families (TANF) is funded at $738,220, primarily for training of TANF clients. The Human Services Fund is totally funded through state and federal programs with the exception of the 25% local match for the Aging program, which amounts to $12,351. The transportation function has been contracted to the City of Greeley, effective in 2009. The budgeting for the IGA with the City of Greeley is in the General Fund in budget unit 1000-16500. All Human Services indirect costs are included in the 2009 budget. Other programs of the Human Services Fund remain relatively stable programmatically with the following 2008 funding levels: Transportation $ 0 Supplemental Foods 1,428,630 Area Agency on Aging 1,920,251 Senior Nutrition 491,560 CSBG 279,270 Value of Supplemental Foods Inventory 1,411,850 In the above programs, Weld County must continue to be responsive and reactive to federal and state administrative and budget changes in 2009. The budget includes funding for Head Start programs totaling $3,032,279, with an additional $2,343,302 for Migrant Head Start. Migrant Head Start was reduced $810,842 due to the relinquishment of the Western Slope portion of the program, effective November 7, 2008. The Pre-School Program is funded at $147,510, and all the educational programs total $4,712,249, down $706,285. 322 HUMAN SERVICES FUND SUMMARY OF REVENUES 200 2008 2009 2009 2009 Fund Org Acct Account Title Budget Request Recommend Final INTERGOVERNMENTAL 2611 60000 4314 USDA 200,000 217,500 217,500 217,500 2617 60000 4314 USDA 0 12,000 12,000 12,000 2653 60000 4314 USDA 35,000 33,250 33,250 33,250 2654 60000 4314 USDA 11,000 10,450 10,450 10,450 261496 60000 4314 USDA 73,600 67,000 67,000 42,600 267695 60000 4314 USDA 224,728 208,500 208,500 208,500 2611 60000 4320 FEDERAL GRANTS 2,773,766 2,814,779 2,814,779 2,814,779 2627 60000 4320 FEDERAL GRANTS 33,000 33,000 33,000 33,000 2628 60000 4320 FEDERAL GRANTS 45,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 2635 60000 4320 FEDERAL GRANTS 135,925 0 0 0 2636 60000 4320 FEDERAL GRANTS 366,668 376,710 376,710 376,710 2637 60000 4320 FEDERAL GRANTS 514,087 597,893 597,893 597,893 2640 60000 4320 FEDERAL GRANTS 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 2642 60000 4320 FEDERAL GRANTS 13,825 0 0 0 2643 60000 4320 FEDERAL GRANTS 479,346 299,073 299,073 299,073 2644 60000 4320 FEDERAL GRANTS 0 166,610 166,610 166,610 2649 60000 4320 FEDERAL GRANTS 89,113 0 0 0 2651 60000 4320 FEDERAL GRANTS 57,830 64,600 64,600 64,600 2652 60000 4320 FEDERAL GRANTS 234,110 230,330 230,330 230,330 2653 60000 4320 FEDERAL GRANTS 215,020 271,860 271,860 271,860 2654 60000 4320 FEDERAL GRANTS 31,000 31,000 31,000 31,000 2655 60000 4320 FEDERAL GRANTS 13,040 20,210 20,210 20,210 2657 60000 4320 FEDERAL GRANTS 2,230 2,910 2,910 2,910 2658 60000 4320 FEDERAL GRANTS 5,390 5,740 5,740 5,740 2662 60000 4320 FEDERAL GRANTS 199,000 143,254 143,254 0 2673 60000 4320 FEDERAL GRANTS 80,450 85,310 85,310 85,310 261496 60000 4320 FEDERAL GRANTS 2,243,168 2,276,302 2,276,302 1,489,860 261506 60000 4320 FEDERAL GRANTS 823,335 0 0 0 262695 60000 4320 FEDERAL GRANTS 769,804 780,000 780,000 780,000 263906 60000 4320 FEDERAL GRANTS 19,500 0 0 0 263907 60000 4320 FEDERAL GRANTS 0 18,000 18,000 18,000 265995 60000 4320 FEDERAL GRANTS 0 998,280 998,280 998,280 267695 60000 4320 FEDERAL GRANTS 1,220,131 1,220,131 1,220,131 1,220,131 267895 60000 4320 FEDERAL GRANTS 164,130 279,270 279,270 191,990 2663 60000 4321 MEDICAID 87,380 97,600 97,600 0 2672 60000 4321 MEDICAID 66,290 78,600 78,600 0 267695 60000 4324 VALUE OF INVENTORY 1,421,050 1,411,850 1,411,850 1,411,850 2618 60000 4340 GRANTS 10,000 0 0 0 2632 60000 4340 GRANTS 675,190 738,220 738,220 738,220 2635 60000 4340 GRANTS 0 130,750 130,750 130,750 2638 60000 4340 GRANTS 41,600 54,578 54,578 54,578 2646 60000 4340 GRANTS 151,200 151,200 151,200 151,200 2648 60000 4340 GRANTS 221,460 255,750 255,750 255,750 2649 60000 4340 GRANTS 0 83,051 83,051 83,051 2665 60000 4340 GRANTS 1,600 10,000 10,000 10,000 2666 60000 4340 GRANTS 3,900 5,000 5,000 5,000 2667 60000 4340 GRANTS 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 2669 60000 4340 GRANTS 26,090 0 0 0 2671 60000 4340 GRANTS 331,990 476,520 476,520 476,520 262995 60000 4340 GRANTS 156,240 178,500 178,500 178,500 265995 60000 4340 GRANTS 858,280 0 0 0 2651 60000 711000 TRANSFER 12,351 12,351 12,351 12,351 2662 60000 711000 TRANSFER 105,000 105,000 105,000 0 TOTAL INTERGOVERNMENTAL 15,277,817 15,137,932 15,137,932 13,815,356 323 HUMAN SERVICES FUND SUMMARY OF REVENUES 200 2008 2009 2009 2009 Fund Orq Acct Account Title Budget Request Recommend Final CHARGE FOR SERVICES 2617 60000 4410 CHARGE FOR SERVICES 128,000 135,510 135,510 135,510 2632 60000 4410 CHARGE FOR SERVICES 65,000 0 0 0 2645 60000 4410 CHARGE FOR SERVICES 300,000 240,000 240,000 240,000 2646 60000 4410 CHARGE FOR SERVICES 50,000 70,000 70,000 70,000 2652 60000 4410 CHARGE FOR SERVICES 500 0 0 0 2663 60000 4410 CHARGE FOR SERVICES 0 4,100 4,100 0 2670 60000 4410 CHARGE FOR SERVICES 0 55,750 55,750 0 TOTAL CHARGE FOR SERVICES 543,500 505,360 505,360 445,510 MISCELLANEOUS 2652 60000 4690 DONATIONS 0 100 100 100 2653 60000 4690 DONATIONS 155,000 145,000 145,000 145,000 TOTAL MISCELLANEOUS 155,000 145,100 145,100 145,100 TOTAL HUMAN SERVICES FUND 15,976,317 15.788.392 15,788,392 14,405.966 324 HUMAN SERVICES FUND SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES 2009 2008 2009 2009 2009 Fund Org Expenditure Function Budget Request Recommend Final 2611 60000 HUMAN SERVICES 2,973,766 3,032,279 3,032,279 3,032,279 261496 60000 HUMAN SERVICES 2,316,768 2,343,302 2,343,302 1,532,460 261506 60000 HUMAN SERVICES 823,335 0 0 0 2617 60000 HUMAN SERVICES 128,000 147,510 147,510 147,510 2618 60000 HUMAN SERVICES 10,000 0 0 0 262695 60000 HUMAN SERVICES 769,804 780,000 780,000 780,000 2627 60000 HUMAN SERVICES 33,000 33,000 33,000 33,000 2628 60000 HUMAN SERVICES 45,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 262995 60000 HUMAN SERVICES 156,240 178,500 178,500 178,500 2632 60000 HUMAN SERVICES 740,190 738,220 738,220 738,220 2635 60000 HUMAN SERVICES 135,925 130,750 130,750 130,750 2636 60000 HUMAN SERVICES 366,668 376,710 376,710 376,710 2637 60000 HUMAN SERVICES 514,087 597,893 597,893 597,893 2638 60000 HUMAN SERVICES 41,600 54,578 54,578 54,578 263906 60000 HUMAN SERVICES 19,500 0 0 0 263907 60000 HUMAN SERVICES 0 18,000 18,000 18,000 2640 60000 HUMAN SERVICES 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 2642 60000 HUMAN SERVICES 13,825 0 0 0 2643 60000 HUMAN SERVICES 479,346 299,073 299,073 299,073 2644 60000 HUMAN SERVICES 0 166,610 166,610 166,610 2645 60000 HUMAN SERVICES 300,000 240,000 240,000 240,000 2646 60000 HUMAN SERVICES 201,200 221,200 221,200 221,200 2648 60000 HUMAN SERVICES 221,460 255,750 255,750 255,750 2649 60000 HUMAN SERVICES 89,113 83,051 83,051 83,051 2651 60000 HUMAN SERVICES 70,181 0 0 0 2651 60100 ADMIN COST POOL 0 57,321 57,321 57,321 2651 60105 EMPLOYMENT SERVICES COST POOL 0 5,990 5,990 5,990 2651 60110 AREA AGENCY ON AGING COST POOL 0 13,640 13,640 13,640 2652 60000 HUMAN SERVICES 234,610 115,840 115,840 115,840 2652 60100 ADMIN COST POOL 0 3,860 3,860 3,860 2652 60105 EMPLOYMENT SERVICES COST POOL 0 260 260 260 2652 60110 AREA AGENCY ON AGING COST POOL 0 110,470 110,470 110,470 2653 60000 HUMAN SERVICES 405,020 231,240 231,240 231,240 2653 60100 ADMIN COST POOL 0 2,020 2,020 2,020 2653 60110 AREA AGENCY ON AGING COST POOL 0 137,930 137,930 137,930 2653 60115 TRANSPORTATION COST POOL 0 78,920 78,920 78,920 2654 60000 HUMAN SERVICES 42,000 41,450 41,450 41,450 2655 60000 HUMAN SERVICES 13,040 2,180 2,180 2,180 2655 60105 EMPLOYMENT SERVICES COST POOL 0 30 30 30 2655 60110 AREA AGENCY ON AGING COST POOL 0 18,000 18,000 18,000 2657 60000 HUMAN SERVICES 2,230 0 0 0 2657 60105 EMPLOYMENT SERVICES COST POOL 0 90 90 90 2657 60110 AREA AGENCY ON AGING COST POOL 0 2,820 2,820 2,820 2658 60000 HUMAN SERVICES 5,390 570 570 570 2658 60110 AREA AGENCY ON AGING COST POOL 0 5,170 5,170 5,170 265995 60000 HUMAN SERVICES 858,280 45,890 45,890 45,890 265995 60100 ADMIN COST POOL 0 17,060 17,060 17,060 265995 60110 AREA AGENCY ON AGING COST POOL 0 935,330 935,330 935,330 2662 60000 HUMAN SERVICES 304,000 248,254 248,254 0 2663 60000 HUMAN SERVICES 87,380 101,700 101,700 0 2665 60000 HUMAN SERVICES 1,600 10,000 10,000 10,000 2666 60000 HUMAN SERVICES 3,900 5,000 5,000 5,000 2667 60000 HUMAN SERVICES 10,000 0 0 0 2667 60110 AREA AGENCY ON AGING COST POOL 0 10,000 10,000 10,000 2669 60000 HUMAN SERVICES 26,090 0 0 0 2670 60000 HUMAN SERVICES 0 55,750 55,750 0 2671 60000 HUMAN SERVICES 331,990 258,680 258,680 258,680 2671 60100 ADMIN COST POOL 0 7,660 7,660 7,660 325 HUMAN SERVICES FUND SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES 2009 2008 2009 2009 2009 Fund Org Expenditure Function Budget Request Recommend Final 2671 60110 AREA AGENCY ON AGING COST POOL 0 160,180 160,180 160,180 2671 60115 TRANSPORTATION COST POOL 0 50,000 50,000 50,000 2672 60000 HUMAN SERVICES 66,290 78,600 78,600 0 2673 60000 HUMAN SERVICES 80,450 42,500 42,500 42,500 2673 60100 ADMIN COST POOL 0 3,850 3,850 3,850 2673 60105 EMPLOYMENT SERVICES COST POOL 0 30 30 30 2673 60110 AREA AGENCY ON AGING COST POOL 0 38,930 38,930 38,930 267695 60000 HUMAN SERVICES 2,865,909 2,834,481 2,834,481 2,834,481 267695 60100 ADMIN COST POOL 0 6,000 6,000 6,000 267895 60000 HUMAN SERVICES 164,130 122,000 122,000 122,000 267895 60100 ADMIN COST POOL 0 18,500 18,500 18,500 267895 60110 AREA AGENCY ON AGING COST POOL 0 51,490 51,490 51,490 267895 60115 TRANSPORTATION COST POOL 0 87,280 87,280 0 TOTAL HUMAN SERVICES FUND 15.976,317 15.788.392 15.788.392 14.405.966 326 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: HUMAN SERVICES FUND BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Head Start Program - - 60000-2611 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: Health, nutrition, education and day care programs for economically disadvantaged pre-school age children. ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED FINAL RESOURCES LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 2,031,831 $ 2,084,000 $ 1,836,142 $ 1,836,142 Supplies 416,799 416,500 473,500 473,500 Purchased Services 579,944 470,266 719,637 719,637 Fixed Charges 4,775 3,000 3,000 3,000 Gross County Cost $ 3,033,349 $ 2,973,766 $ 3,032,279 $ 3,032,279 Revenue 3,033,349 2,973,766 3,032,279 3,032,279 Net County Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Budget Positions - - - - - - -- SUMMARY OF CHANGES: No significant changes in this program. OBJECTIVES: 1) Administer program in accordance with Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) rules and regulations; and 2) Provide services to eligible clients as specified in the Head Start plan approved by the Board. PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Work Outputs Clients Served 562 562 562 Efficiency Measures Per capita cost $13.39 $12.74 $12.44 Per capita cost (county support) In-Kind $3.35 $3.19 $3.11 Effectiveness Measures (desired results) Maintain full case load slots 562 562 562 FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. BOARD ACTION: Approved as recommended. 327 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: HUMAN SERVICES FUND BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Migrant Head Start- - 60000-2614 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: Health, nutrition and day care programs for infant/toddler and preschool-age migrant children in Northeast Colorado and the Western slope. ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED FINAL RESOURCES LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 1,433,076 $ 1,382,646 $ 1,408,360 $ 941,387 Supplies 241,351 262,000 246,000 146,600 Purchased Services 687,948 671,012 687,842 444,473 Fixed Charges 1,159 1,110 1,100 0 Gross County Cost $ 2,363,534 $ 2,316,768 $ 2,343,302 $ 1,532,460 Revenue 2,363,534 2,316,768 2,343,302 1,532,460 Net County Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Budget Positions - - - - - - -- SUMMARY OF CHANGES: The Department is examining alternatives to the current method of administration of the Migrant Head Start program. OBJECTIVES: 1) Administer program in accordance with DHHS rules and regulations; and 2) Provide services to eligible clients as specified in the Migrant Head Start plan. PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Work Outputs Clients served 275 275 180 Efficiency Measures Per capita cost $10.43 $9.93 $6.29 Per capita cost (county support) In-kind $2.61 $2.48 $1.53 Effectiveness Measures (desired results) Maintain performance standards Yes Yes Yes 328 MIGRANT HEAD START (CONTINUED) 60000-2614 FINANCE/ADMINISTRATIONRECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. This budget will be reduced with the 2009 contract due to the county relinquishing the western slope portion of the program on November 7, 2008. Final figures will be adjusted with a supplemental appropriation reduction in 2009 with the final contract. BOARD ACTION: The budget was reduced $810,842 due to the County's decision to relinquish the Western Slope portion of the program on November 7, 2008. Only 180 Weld County students will be served. 329 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: HUMAN SERVICES FUND BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Building Healthy Marriages - - 60000-2615 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: The Weld County Healthy Marriage Initiative is strengthening marriages by providing low-income couples with marriage education and support services on a voluntary basis so that they can gain the skills necessary to have healthy marriages. ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED FINAL RESOURCES LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 268,427 $ 354,389 $ 0 $ 0 Supplies 30,933 25,747 0 0 Purchased Services 364,625 443,199 0 0 Fixed Charges 0 0 0 0 Gross County Cost $ 663,985 $ 823,335 $ 0 $ 0 Revenue 663,985 823,335 0 0 Net County Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Budget Positions - - - - - - -- SUMMARY OF CHANGES: This contract will be discontinued in 2009 and combined with the Department of Human Services' Building Healthy Marriages Grant. FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. BOARD ACTION: Approved as recommended. 330 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: HUMAN SERVICES FUND BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Preschool Fund - - 60000-2617 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: Contracted Preschool slots with various school districts. ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED FINAL RESOURCES LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 99,046 $ 89,108 $ 88,900 $ 88,900 Supplies 25,470 3,000 36,610 36,610 Purchased Services 13,739 35,892 22,000 22,000 Gross County Cost $ 138,255 $ 128,000 $ 147,510 $ 147,510 Revenue 138,255 128,000 147,510 147,510 Net County Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Budget Positions - - - - - - -- SUMMARY OF CHANGES: No significant changes in this program. OBJECTIVES: Provide preschool services to school districts requesting the services. PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Work Outputs Clients served 41 41 41 Efficiency Measures Per capita cost $0.61 $0.55 $0.61 Effectiveness Measures (desired results) Full slots maintained Yes Yes Yes FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. BOARD ACTION: Approved as recommended. 331 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: HUMAN SERVICES FUND BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Building Health Marriages NSF - -60000-2618 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: This fund houses the Non-Federal Share (matching) for the Building Healthy Marriages Initiative. ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED FINAL RESOURCES LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Supplies 0 0 0 0 Purchased Services 0 0 0 0 Fixed Charges 0 10,000 0 0 Gross County Cost $ 0 $ 10,000 $ 0 $ 0 Revenue 0 10,000 0 0 Net County Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Budget Positions - - - - - - -- SUMMARY OF CHANGES: This contract will be discontinued in 2009 and combined with the Department of Human Services' Building Healthy Marriages non-federal support fund. FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. BOARD ACTION: Approved as recommended. 332 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: HUMAN SERVICES FUND BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Wagner/Peyser- - 60000-2626 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: Administer all Job Service activities to the residents of Weld County. ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED FINAL RESOURCES LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 597,454 $ 692,800 $ 686,400 $ 686,400 Supplies 24,805 2,000 28,860 28,860 Purchased Services 50,347 75,004 64,740 64,740 Gross County Cost $ 672,606 $ 769,804 $ 780,000 $ 780,000 Revenue 672,606 769,804 780,000 780,000 Net County Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Budget Positions - - - - - - - - SUMMARY OF CHANGES: No significant changes in this program. OBJECTIVES: 1) Administer Wagner/Peyser Contract in accordance with DOL rules and regulations; and 2) Provide services to eligible clients as specified in the One Stop plan approved by the Board. PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Work Outputs Clients served 16,000 18,000 19,000 Efficiency Measures Per capita cost $2.97 $3.30 $3.20 Effectiveness Measures (desired results) Job placements 60% 60% 64% FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. BOARD ACTION: Approved as recommended. 333 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: HUMAN SERVICES FUND BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Summer Job Hunt- - 60000-2627 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: Administer youth employment program for the summer months. ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED FINAL RESOURCES LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 29,301 $ 28,500 $ 29,300 $ 29,300 Supplies 132 1,500 500 500 Purchased Services 3,567 3,000 3,200 3,200 Gross County Cost $ 33,000 $ 33,000 $ 33,000 $ 33,000 Revenue 33,000 33,000 33,000 33,000 Net County Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Budget Positions - - - - - - - - SUMMARY OF CHANGES: No significant changes in this program. OBJECTIVES: 1) Administer Summer Job Hunt contract in accordance with DOL rules and regulations; and 2) Provide services to eligible clients as specified in the One Stop plan approved by the Board. PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Work Outputs Clients served 2,743 2,750 2,750 Efficiency Measures Per capita cost $0.15 $0.14 $0.14 Effectiveness Measures (desired results) Clients placed in employment 514 515 515 FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. BOARD ACTION: Approved as recommended. 334 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: HUMAN SERVICES FUND BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Consumer Navigator- - 60000-2628 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: Program to enhance workforce center services to the disabled of the community. ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED FINAL RESOURCES LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 44,737 $ 44,000 $ 45,000 $ 45,000 Supplies 2,058 0 2,000 2,000 Purchased Services 859 1,000 3,000 3,000 Gross County Cost $ 47,654 $ 45,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 Revenue 47,654 45,000 50,000 50,000 Net County Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Budget Positions - - - - - - - - SUMMARY OF CHANGES: No significant changes in this program. OBJECTIVES: To keep clients off public assistance and employed. PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Work Outputs Clients served 260 260 260 Efficiency Measures Per capita cost $0.21 $0.19 $0.21 Effectiveness Measures (desired results) Output goals maintained Yes Yes Yes FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. BOARD ACTION: Approved as recommended. 335 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: HUMAN SERVICES FUND BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Employment First - - 60000-2629 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: This program allows eligible Food Stamp clients to participate in various job search and development activities to retrain them for better paying jobs. ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED FINAL RESOURCES LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 78,540 $ 100,000 $ 120,000 $ 120,000 Supplies 2,058 2,300 2,500 2,500 Purchased Services 66,918 53,940 56,000 56,000 Gross County Cost $ 147,516 $ 156,240 $ 178,500 $ 178,500 Revenue 147,516 156,240 178,500 178,500 Net County Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Budget Positions - - - - - - - - SUMMARY OF CHANGES: No significant changes in this program. OBJECTIVES: 1) Administer program in accordance with USDA rules and regulations; and 2) Provide services to eligible clients as specified in the Employment First plan approved by the Board. PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Work Outputs Clients served 1,458 1,458 1,750 Efficiency Measures Per capita cost $0.65 $0.67 $0.73 Effectiveness Measures (desired results) Clients placed in employment 300 300 350 FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. BOARD ACTION:Approved as recommended. 336 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: HUMAN SERVICES FUND BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Assistance to Needy Families - - 60000-2632 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: Employment/Training program for clients on welfare. ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED FINAL RESOURCES LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 421,432 $ 498,950 $ 497,070 $ 497,070 Supplies 0 0 0 0 Purchased Services 150,395 241,240 241,150 241,150 Gross County Cost $ 571,827 $ 740,190 $ 738,220 $ 738,220 Revenue 571,827 740,190 738,220 738,220 Net County Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Budget Positions - - - - - - - - SUMMARY OF CHANGES: No significant changes in this program. OBJECTIVES: Provide employment services to TANF clients. PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Work Outputs Clients served/month 320 330 330 Efficiency Measures Per capita cost(county support) $2.52 $3.17 $3.03 Effectiveness Measures (desired results) Meet Federal participation rates Yes Yes Yes FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. BOARD ACTION: Approved as recommended. 337 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: HUMAN SERVICES FUND BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Workforce Investment Act (Admin.) 60000-2635 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: This program tracks the administration for all of the Workforce Investment Act grants. ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED FINAL RESOURCES LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 142,140 $ 122,300 $ 115,000 $ 115,000 Supplies 46 200 200 200 Purchased Services 9,756 13,425 15,550 15,550 Gross County Cost $ 151,942 $ 135,925 $ 130,750 $ 130,750 Revenue 151,942 135,925 130,750 130,750 Net County Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Budget Positions - - - - - - - - SUMMARY OF CHANGES: No significant changes in this program. OBJECTIVES: To assist client in finding employment. PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Efficiency Measures Per capita cost $0.67 $0.58 $0.54 FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. BOARD ACTION: Approved as recommended. 338 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: HUMAN SERVICES FUND BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER:Workforce Investment Act (Adult) 60000-2636 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: This program provides employment and training for eligible adults. ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED FINAL RESOURCES LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 261,055 $ 180,000 $ 181,000 $ 181,000 Supplies 24,890 2,500 25,000 25,000 Purchased Services 275,153 184,168 170,710 170,710 Gross County Cost $ 561,098 $ 366,668 $ 376,710 $ 376,710 Revenue 561,098 366,668 376,710 376,710 Net County Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Budget Positions - - - - - - - - SUMMARY OF CHANGES: No significant changes in this program. OBJECTIVES: Provide eligible adults with core services to attain employment. PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Work Outputs Clients served 150 172 210 Efficiency Measures Per capita cost $2.48 $1.57 $1.55 Effectiveness Measures (desired results) Entered employment rate 88% 88% 86% FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. BOARD ACTION: Approved as recommended. 339 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: HUMAN SERVICES FUND BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Workforce Investment Act (Youth) 60000-2637 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: This program provides employment and training programs for in-school and out-of-school youth. ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED FINAL RESOURCES LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 278,794 $ 308,450 $ 448,420 $ 448,420 Supplies 540 14,610 10,000 10,000 Purchased Services 92,584 191,027 139,473 139,473 Gross County Cost $ 371,918 $ 514,087 $ 597,893 $ 597,893 Revenue 371,918 514,087 597,893 597,893 Net County Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Budget Positions - - - - - - - - SUMMARY OF CHANGES: No significant changes in this program. OBJECTIVES: To provide core services to eligible youth. PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Work Outputs Youth served 170 197 294 Efficiency Measures Per capita cost $1.64 $2.20 $2.45 Effectiveness Measures (desired results) Entered Employment rate (Older Youth) 79% 79% 57% Skill Attainment rate (Younger Youth) FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. BOARD ACTION: Approved as recommended. 340 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: HUMAN SERVICES FUND BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Multi-Disciplinary Youth Assessment - - 60000-2638 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: This program provides planning and treatment plans for at-risk youth in combination with the DA, SS, North Range and Island Grove. ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED FINAL RESOURCES LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 42,764 $ 41,100 $ 50,070 $ 50,070 Supplies 84 500 500 500 Purchased Services 0 0 4,008 4,008 Gross County Cost $ 42,848 $ 41,600 $ 54,578 $ 54,578 Revenue 42,848 41,600 54,578 54,578 Net County Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Budget Positions - - - - - - - - SUMMARY OF CHANGES: No significant changes in this program. OBJECTIVES: 1) Administer program in accordance with Social Services contract. PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Work Outputs Clients served 120 120 120 Efficiency Measures Per capita cost $0.19 $0.18 $0.22 Effectiveness Measures (desired results) Maintain requirements of contract Yes Yes Yes FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. BOARD ACTION: Approved as recommended. 341 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: HUMAN SERVICES FUND BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: 10% Incentive Grant (CIMS) 60000-2639 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: To foster the development and continuous improvements of the Weld County region workforce system. ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED FINAL RESOURCES LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 13,724 $ 15,500 $ 14,220 $ 14,220 Supplies 0 0 0 0 Purchased Services 12,546 4,000 3,780 3,780 Gross County Cost $ 26,270 $ 19,500 $ 18,000 $ 18,000 Revenue 26,270 19,500 18,000 18,000 Net County Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Budget Positions - - - - - - - - SUMMARY OF CHANGES: No significant changes in this program. OBJECTIVES: To meet annual requirements of grant. PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Efficiency Measures Per capita cost $0.12 $0.08 $0.07 FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. BOARD ACTION: Approved as recommended. 342 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: HUMAN SERVICES FUND Workforce Investment Act BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: (Statewide Activities Grant) 60000-2640 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: These funds are incentive grants based on performance of the WIA programs and are used for staff training, administration, contracted services and other programs. ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED FINAL RESOURCES LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 4,154 $ 3,000 $ 4,000 $ 4,000 Supplies 4,920 9,000 8,000 8,000 Purchased Services 19,859 13,000 13,000 13,000 Gross County Cost $ 28,933 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 Revenue 28,933 25,000 25,000 25,000 Net County Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Budget Positions - - - - - - - - SUMMARY OF CHANGES: No significant changes in this program. OBJECTIVES: To meet annual requirements of grant. PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Efficiency Measures Per capita cost $0.13 $0.11 $0.10 FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. BOARD ACTION:Approved as recommended. 343 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: HUMAN SERVICES FUND BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: 25% Rapid Response 60000-2642 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: These funds are incentive grants based on performance of the WIA programs and are used for equipment for developing mass application taking via the internet with a smart board. ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED FINAL RESOURCES LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 12,316 $ 13,825 $ 0 $ 0 Supplies 154 0 0 0 Purchased Services 1,355 0 0 0 Gross County Cost $ 13,825 $ 13,825 $ 0 $ 0 Revenue 13,825 13,825 0 0 Net County Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Budget Positions - - - - - - - - SUMMARY OF CHANGES: Program is discontinued. FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. BOARD ACTION: Approved as recommended. 344 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: HUMAN SERVICES FUND Workforce Investment Act BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: (Dislocated Worker Program) 60000-2643 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: This program provides retraining for laid off clients. ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED FINAL RESOURCES LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 220,208 $ 241,330 $ 165,000 $ 165,000 Supplies 25,121 43,600 23,500 23,500 Purchased Services 304,803 194,416 110,573 110,573 Gross County Cost $ 550,132 $ 479,346 $ 299,073 $ 299,073 Revenue 550,132 479,346 299,073 299,073 Net County Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Budget Positions - - - - - - - - SUMMARY OF CHANGES: No significant changes in this program. OBJECTIVES: Provide retraining for eligible laid off clients. PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Work Outputs Clients served 140 140 120 Efficiency Measures Per capita cost $2.43 $2.05 $1.23 Effectiveness Measures (desired results) Entered employment rate 88% 88% 91% FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. BOARD ACTION:Approved as recommended. 345 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: HUMAN SERVICES FUND BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: WIRED Grant - - 60000-2644 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: This grant will develop the Multi-Industry System Technician (MIST) training program to provide skills necessary for employment in energy and related industries. ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED FINAL RESOURCES LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 0 $ 47,970 $ 48,100 $ 48,100 Supplies 0 11,070 11,100 11,100 Purchased Services 0 108,350 107,410 107,410 Gross County Cost $ 0 $ 167,390 $ 166,610 $ 166,610 Revenue 0 167,390 166,610 166,610 Net County Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Budget Positions - - - - - - - - SUMMARY OF CHANGES: This is a new program beginning on May 8, 2008. FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. BOARD ACTION: Approved as recommended. 346 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: HUMAN SERVICES FUND BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Educational Lab - - 60000-2645 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: This fund covers the cost of operating the Computer Education Lab. ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED FINAL RESOURCES LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 130,594 $ 157,000 $ 140,000 $ 140,000 Supplies 70,128 18,000 60,000 60,000 Purchased Services 41,100 125,000 40,000 40,000 Gross County Cost $ 241,822 $ 300,000 $ 240,000 $ 240,000 Revenue 241,822 300,000 240,000 240,000 Net County Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Budget Positions - - - - - - - - SUMMARY OF CHANGES: No significant changes in this program. OBJECTIVES: Provide a computer educational experience for clients. PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Work Outputs Clients served 1,135 1,200 1,350 Efficiency Measures Per capita cost $1.07 $1.29 $0.98 Effectiveness Measures (desired results) GED's obtained 65 70 90 FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. BOARD ACTION: Approved as recommended. 347 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: HUMAN SERVICES FUND BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: AmeriCorps Program - - 60000-2646 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: Youth Corp program. ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED FINAL RESOURCES LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 122,110 $ 189,880 $ 187,428 $ 187,428 Supplies 16,964 11,320 15,000 15,000 Purchased Services 35,653 0 18,772 18,772 Gross County Cost $ 174,727 $ 201,200 $ 221,200 $ 221,200 Revenue 174,727 201,200 221,200 221,200 Net County Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Budget Positions - - - - - - - - SUMMARY OF CHANGES: No significant changes in this program. OBJECTIVES: Provide Federal AmeriCorps program for youth to receive stipends and college tuition credits for public service work. PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Work Outputs Participants in program 12 12 12 Efficiency Measures Per capita cost $0.77 $0.86 $0.91 Effectiveness Measures (desired results) Clients completing program 11 10 6 FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. BOARD ACTION: Approved as recommended. 348 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: HUMAN SERVICES FUND BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Tight Corp Program - - 60000-2648 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: Youth Corp Program ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED FINAL RESOURCES LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 89,531 $ 93,620 $ 109,295 $ 109,295 Supplies 4,475 8,400 8,400 8,400 Purchased Services 99,776 119,440 138,055 138,055 Gross County Cost $ 193,782 $ 221,460 $ 255,750 $ 255,750 Revenue 193,782 221,460 255,750 255,750 Net County Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Budget Positions - - - - - - - - SUMMARY OF CHANGES: No significant changes in this program. OBJECTIVES: To engage youth in community service and educational activities in lieu of out of home placement with the Department of Social Services. PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Work Outputs Participants 24 24 24 Efficiency Measures Per capita cost $0.86 $0.95 $1.05 Effectiveness Measures (desired results) Participants completing program 18 18 19 FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. BOARD ACTION: Approved as recommended. 349 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: HUMAN SERVICES FUND BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Pillars of Successful Independence - - 60000-2640 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: A TANF Program for foster children, ages 13-1/2 to 15 preparing them for transition to adulthood. ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED FINAL RESOURCES LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 27,148 $ 66,265 $ 57,860 $ 57,860 Supplies 0 600 600 600 Purchased Services 4,131 22,248 24,591 24,591 Gross County Cost $ 31,279 $ 89,113 $ 83,051 $ 83,051 Revenue 31,279 89,113 83,051 83,051 Net County Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Budget Positions - - - - - - - - SUMMARY OF CHANGES: No significant changes in this program. OBJECTIVES: To provide core services to eligible youth. PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Work Outputs Clients served - - 15 15 Efficiency Measures Per capita cost $0.14 $0.38 $0.34 Effectiveness Measures (desired results) To enhance the ability of Foster children to gain independence. - - 15 15 FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. BOARD ACTION:Approved as recommended. 350 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: HUMAN SERVICES FUND BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Area Agency on Aging (Admin.) 60000-2651 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: This Older American's Act Grant administers the Senior programs of the Area Agency on Aging. ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED FINAL RESOURCES LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 51,430 $ 27,710 $ 10,830 $ 10,830 Supplies 380 60 0 0 Purchased Services 20,580 42,411 66,121 66,121 Gross County Cost $ 72,390 $ 70,181 $ 76,951 $ 76,951 Revenue 60,039 57,830 64,600 64,600 Net County Cost $ 12,351 $ 12,351 $ 12,351 $ 12,351 Budget Positions - - - - - - - - SUMMARY OF CHANGES: No significant changes in this program. OBJECTIVES: 1)Administer program as defined by CDHS/OAA rules and regulations; and 2) Provide services to eligible clients as specified in the Area Agency on Aging grant approved by the Board. PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Work Outputs Programs administered 11 11 11 Efficiency Measures Per capita cost (county support) $0.06 $0.06 $0.05 Per capita cost(other) $0.26 $0.25 $0.27 FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. BOARD ACTION:Approved as recommended. 351 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: HUMAN SERVICES FUND BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Area Agency on Aging (Support) 60000-2652 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: This grant provides several contracted services to the elderly; adult day care, home nursing care, peer counseling, outreach, respite services, legal counseling and ombudsman assistance. ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED FINAL RESOURCES LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 77,890 $ 85,050 $ 91,460 $ 91,460 Supplies 20 0 20 20 Purchased Services 111,250 149,560 138,950 138,950 Gross County Cost $ 189,160 $ 234,610 $ 230,430 $ 230,430 Revenue 189,160 234,610 230,430 230,430 Net County Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Budget Positions - - - - - - - - SUMMARY OF CHANGES: No significant changes in this program. OBJECTIVES: 1) Administer program as defined by CDHS/OAA rules and regulations; and 2) Provide services to eligible clients as specified in the Area Agency on Aging grant approved by the Board. PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Work Outputs Outreach - Hispanic Senior Outreach 1,600 500 1,000 Adult day care 7,900 7,000 2,100 Peer Counseling 2,300 2,000 2,000 Legal consultation/representation 1,100 900 900 Homemaker and personal care 1,200 1,100 1,000 Nursing home advocacy 1,600 1,600 1,600 Efficiency Measures Per capita cost $0.83 $1.01 $0.95 Effectiveness Measures (desired results) Work output goals are maintained Yes Yes Yes FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. BOARD ACTION: Approved as recommended. 352 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: HUMAN SERVICES FUND Area Agency on Aging BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: (Congregate Meal Program) 60000-2653 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: This grant provides meals to the senior population at 23 nutrition sites around the county. ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED FINAL RESOURCES LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 145,470 $ 70,620 $ 98,080 $ 98,080 Supplies 7,800 3,630 5,890 5,890 Purchased Services 211,680 330,770 346,140 346,140 Gross County Cost $ 364,950 $ 405,020 $ 450,110 $ 450,110 Revenue 364,950 405,020 450,110 450,110 Net County Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Budget Positions - - - - - - - - SUMMARY OF CHANGES: No significant changes in this program. OBJECTIVES: 1) Administer program as defined by CDHS/OAA rules and regulations; and 2) Provide services to eligible clients as specified in the Area Agency on Aging grant approved by the Board. PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Work Outputs Meals served 46,700 56,000 52,000 Efficiency Measures Per capita cost $1.61 $1.74 $1.85 FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. BOARD ACTION:Approved as recommended. 353 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: HUMAN SERVICES FUND Area Agency on Aging BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: (Home Delivered Meals) 60000-2654 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: This grant provides home delivered meals through Meals on Wheels and also funds the Liquid Supplement Program. ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED FINAL RESOURCES LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Supplies 0 0 0 0 Purchased Services 44,170 42,000 41,450 41,450 Gross County Cost $ 44,170 $ 42,000 $ 41,450 $ 41,450 Revenue 44,170 42,000 41,450 41,450 Net County Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Budget Positions - - - - - - - - SUMMARY OF CHANGES: No significant changes in this program. OBJECTIVES: 1) Administer program as defined by CDHS/OAA rules and regulations; and 2) Provide services to eligible clients as specified in the Area Agency on Aging grant approved by the Board. PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Work Outputs Meals Served 18,000 15,500 13,400 Efficiency Measures Per capita cost $0.19 $0.18 $0.17 Effectiveness Measures (desired results) Work output goals are maintained. Yes Yes Yes FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. BOARD ACTION:Approved as recommended. 354 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: HUMAN SERVICES FUND BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Area Agency on Aging (Health Services) 60000-2655 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: This grant provides health services to senior community. This grant supports the annual senior health fair and the wellspring club. ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED FINAL RESOURCES LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 7,520 $ 0 $ 16,490 $ 16,490 Supplies 290 140 1,700 1,700 Purchased Services 2,070 12,900 2,020 2,020 Gross County Cost $ 9,880 $ 13,040 $ 20,210 $ 20,210 Revenue 9,880 13,040 20,210 20,210 Net County Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Budget Positions - - - - - - - - SUMMARY OF CHANGES: No significant changes in this program. OBJECTIVES: 1)Administer program as defined by CDHS/OAA rules and regulations; and 2) Provide services to eligible clients as specified in the Area Agency on Aging grant approved by the Board. PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Work Outputs Clients served 400 450 450 Efficiency Measures Per capita cost $0.04 $0.06 $0.08 Effectiveness Measures (desired results) Work output goals are maintained Yes Yes Yes FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. BOARD ACTION: Approved as recommended. 355 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: HUMAN SERVICES FUND Area Agency on Aging BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: (Elder Abuse Grant) 60000-2657 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: This grant provides for educational training to the community on elder abuse. ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED FINAL RESOURCES LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 840 $ 2,230 $ 1,010 $ 1,010 Supplies 0 0 0 0 Purchased Services 10 0 1,900 1,900 Gross County Cost $ 850 $ 2,230 $ 2,910 $ 2,910 Revenue 850 2,230 2,910 2,910 Net County Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Budget Positions - - - - - - - - SUMMARY OF CHANGES: No significant changes in this program. OBJECTIVES: Provide training to the community on elderly abuse. PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Work Outputs Educated CNA, staff, NH residents/families 200 200 200 Efficiency Measures Per capita cost $0.00 $0.01 $0.01 Effectiveness Measures (desired results) Education of long term staff Yes Yes Yes FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. BOARD ACTION: Approved as recommended. 356 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: HUMAN SERVICES FUND Area Agency on Aging BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: (Special Ombudsman) 60000-2658 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: These funds supplement the support services fund. ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED FINAL RESOURCES LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 4,500 $ 4,530 $ 3,910 $ 3,910 Supplies 0 0 0 0 Purchased Services 610 860 1,830 1,830 Gross County Cost $ 5,110 $ 5,390 $ 5,740 $ 5,740 Revenue 5,110 5,390 5,740 5,740 Net County Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Budget Positions - - - - - - - - SUMMARY OF CHANGES: No significant changes in this program. OBJECTIVES: 1) Administer program as defined by CDHS/OAA rules and regulations; and 2) Provide services to eligible clients as specified in the Area Agency on Aging grant approved by the Board. PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Work Outputs Complaints investigated 150 150 150 Efficiency Measures Per capita cost $0.02 $0.02 $0.02 Effectiveness Measures (desired results) Work outputs are maintained Yes Yes Yes FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. BOARD ACTION: Approved as recommended. 357 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: HUMAN SERVICES FUND Area Agency on Aging BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: (Single Entry Point) 60000-2659 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: This grant provides case management services to Medicaid eligible clients. ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED FINAL RESOURCES LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 585,600 $ 760,840 $ 866,030 $ 866,030 Supplies 8,170 870 5,710 5,710 Purchased Services 94,340 96,570 126,540 126,540 Gross County Cost $ 688,110 $ 858,280 $ 998,280 $ 998,280 Revenue 688,110 858,280 998,280 998,280 Net County Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Budget Positions - - - - - - - - SUMMARY OF CHANGES:This budget unit will increase by 2 case managers. OBJECTIVES: 1)Administer program as defined by CDSS rules and regulations; and 2)Provide services to eligible clients as specified in the Area Agency on Aging grant approved by the Board. PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Work Outputs Clients served 800 800 1,000 Efficiency Measures Per capita cost $3.04 $3.68 $4.10 Effectiveness Measures (desired results) Divert Medicaid Eligible clients from Institutional care to cost effective home care 800 800 1,000 FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. BOARD ACTION: Approved as recommended. 358 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: HUMAN SERVICES FUND BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Federal Transit Grant - - 60000-2662 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: This grant supplements minibus services to the elderly of the County. ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED FINAL RESOURCES LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 64,617 $ 81,080 $ 104,432 $ 0 Purchased Services 32,551 222,920 38,822 0 Gross County Cost $ 97,168 $ 304,000 $ 143,254 $ 0 Revenue 97,168 304,000 143,254 0 Net County Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Budget Positions - - - - - - - - SUMMARY OF CHANGES: No significant changes in this program. OBJECTIVES: 1)Administer program as defined by CDOT rules and regulations; and 2) Provide services to eligible clients as specified in the FTA grant approved by the Board. PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Work Outputs Miles tracked 325,000 353,500 n/a Efficiency Measures Per capita cost $0.43 $1.30 $0.00 Effectiveness Measures (desired results) Passenger trips 56,700 22,500 n/a FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. BOARD ACTION: On October 27, 2008, the Board decided to enter into an IGA with the City of Greeley to provide all mini bus transit services for Weld County. The contract for the IGA is budgeted in the General Fund in budget unit 1000-16500. 359 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: HUMAN SERVICES FUND BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: NEMT Transportation - - 60000-2663 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: Non-Emergent Medicaid Transit provides medical transportation for Medicaid clients with broker services. ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED FINAL RESOURCES LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 41,153 $ 28,539 $ 29,000 $ 0 Supplies 6,255 0 120 0 Purchased Services 0 58,841 60,880 0 Gross County Cost $ 47,408 $ 87,380 $ 90,000 $ 0 Revenue 47,408 87,380 90,000 0 Net County Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Budget Positions - - - - - - - - SUMMARY OF CHANGES: The department is examining the possibility of contracting with Logisticare to provide the broker services associated with this Budget Unit. We are also attempting to recruit private vendors to provide transportation services, in order to broaden the hours when such services could be made available to clients. OBJECTIVES: To meet the eligible transportation needs of Medicaid clients. Program reinstated in 2008 after elimination in 2006. FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. Concur with contracting with Logisticare and recruiting private vendors to provide transportation services. BOARD ACTION: On October 27, 2008, the Board decided to enter into an IGA with the City of Greeley to provide all mini bus transit services for Weld County. The contract for the IGA is budgeted in the General Fund in budget unit 1000-16500. 360 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: HUMAN SERVICES FUND BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Area Agency on Aging (CHIP) - - 60000-2665 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: This area includes minor sources of funding that supplement the dental, vision, and hearing programs provided through Area Agency on Aging. ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED FINAL RESOURCES LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Supplies 0 0 0 0 Purchased Services 0 1,600 10,000 10,000 Gross County Cost $ 0 $ 1,600 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 Revenue 0 1,600 10,000 10,000 Net County Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Budget Positions - - - - - - - - SUMMARY OF CHANGES:This is a year-to-year grant. We will be applying for it again this year, in the amount of$10,000. OBJECTIVES: Supplement other senior programs in Weld County. PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Work Outputs Clients served 35 25 25 Efficiency Measures Per capita cost $0.02 $0.01 $0.04 Effectiveness Measures (desired results) Maintain work output goals Yes Yes Yes FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. BOARD ACTION: Approved as recommended. 361 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: HUMAN SERVICES FUND BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Area Agency on Aging (NMCM) - - 60000-2666 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: This area includes minor sources of funding that supplement the aging programs. ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED FINAL RESOURCES LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Supplies 0 0 0 0 Purchased Services 7,470 3,900 3,900 3,900 Gross County Cost $ 7,470 $ 3,900 $ 3,900 $ 3,900 Revenue 7,470 3,900 3,900 3,900 Net County Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Budget Positions - - - - - - - - SUMMARY OF CHANGES:This is a year-to-year grant. We will be applying for it again this year. OBJECTIVES: Supplement other senior programs in Weld County. PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Work Outputs Clients served 18 10 10 Efficiency Measures Per capita cost $0.03 $0.02 $0.02 Effectiveness Measures (desired results) Maintain work output goals Yes Yes Yes FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. BOARD ACTION:Approved as recommended. 362 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: HUMAN SERVICES FUND BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Area Agency on Aging (VALE) - - 60000-2667 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: This area includes minor sources of funding that supplement the aging programs. ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED FINAL RESOURCES LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Supplies 0 0 0 0 Purchased Services 5,460 10,000 10,000 10,000 Gross County Cost $ 5,460 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 Revenue 5,460 10,000 10,000 10,000 Net County Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Budget Positions - - - - - - - - SUMMARY OF CHANGES: No significant changes in this program. OBJECTIVES: Supplement other senior programs in Weld County. PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Work Outputs Clients served 600 600 600 Efficiency Measures Per capita cost $0.02 $0.04 $0.04 Effectiveness Measures (desired results) Maintain work output goals Yes Yes Yes FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. BOARD ACTION: Approved as recommended. 363 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: HUMAN SERVICES FUND BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Area Agency on Aging (Other Programs) 60000-2669 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: This area includes minor sources of funding that supplement the aging programs. ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED FINAL RESOURCES LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Supplies 0 0 0 0 Purchased Services 0 0 0 0 Gross County Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Revenue 0 0 0 0 Net County Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Budget Positions - - - - - - - - SUMMARY OF CHANGES: This unit was moved into separate funds for activities previously posted here. See fund 2666 (NMCM) and 2667 (VALE). OBJECTIVES: Supplement other senior programs in Weld County. FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. BOARD ACTION:Approved as recommended. 364 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: HUMAN SERVICES FUND BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Transportation - - 60000-2670 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED FINAL RESOURCES LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 34,562 $ 0 $ 34,900 $ 0 Supplies 0 0 0 0 Purchased Services 0 0 20,850 0 Gross County Cost $ 34,562 $ 0 $ 55,750 $ 0 Revenue 34,562 0 55,750 0 Net County Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Budget Positions - - - - - - - - SUMMARY OF CHANGES: No significant changes in this program. OBJECTIVES: Provide a mail route service to connect Greeley, Del Camino and Fort Lupton County offices three times weekly. FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. BOARD ACTION: The mail route and courier service for the county has been centralized in the Printing and Supply Department in the General Fund, beginning in 2009. 365 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: HUMAN SERVICES FUND BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Area Agency on Aging (State Funds) 60000-2671 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: Supplemental funding source started 7/1/2000. A combination of HB-1072 funds and General Fund Long Bill monies. ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED FINAL RESOURCES LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 91,400 $ 60,700 $ 119,260 $ 119,260 Supplies 300 80 1,500 1,500 Purchased Services 159,600 271,210 355,760 355,760 Gross County Cost $ 251,300 $ 331,990 $ 476,520 $ 476,520 Revenue 251,300 331,990 476,520 476,520 Net County Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Budget Positions - - - - - - - - SUMMARY OF CHANGES:Anticipate increasing the state-funded AAA staff by one information and Assistance position. OBJECTIVES: 1) Administer program as defined by CDHS/OAA rules and regulations; and 2) Provide services to eligible clients as specified in the Area Agency on Aging grant approved by the Board. PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Work Outputs Dental/vision/hearing Clients Served 45 50 100 Meals served 13,000 3,700 6,500 Loneliness contacts 1,700 1,500 1,500 Ombudsman clients served 600 300 600 Chore clients served 35 45 30 Efficiency Measures Per capita cost $1.11 $1.42 $1.95 FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. BOARD ACTION: Approved as recommended. 366 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: HUMAN SERVICES FUND BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Medicaid Transportation - - 60000-2672 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: Non-medical transportation of Single Entry Point clients and medical transportation for Medicaid clients with broker services. ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED FINAL RESOURCES LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 70,975 $ 66,290 $ 40,400 $ Supplies 0 0 160 0 Purchased Services 727 0 38,040 0 Gross County Cost $ 71,702 $ 66,290 $ 78,600 $ 0 Revenue 71,702 66,290 78,600 0 Net County Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Budget Positions - - - - - - - - SUMMARY OF CHANGES: The Department is examining the possibility of contracting with Logisticare to provide the broker services associated with this Budget Unit. We are also attempting to recruit private vendors to provide transportation services, in order to broaden the hours when such services could be made available to clients. OBJECTIVES: To meet the eligible transportation needs of Medicaid clients. FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. Concur with contracting with Logisticare and recruiting private vendors to provide transportation services. BOARD ACTION: On October 27, 2008, the Board decided to enter into an IGA with the City of Greeley to provide all mini bus transit services for Weld County. The contract for the IGA is budgeted in the General Fund in budget unit 1000-16500. 367 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: HUMAN SERVICES FUND BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Part E Family Caregiver Support- - 60000-2673 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: This program provides support to family who are caring for relatives at home. ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED FINAL RESOURCES LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 27,800 $ 0 $ 26,120 $ 26,120 Supplies 1,030 170 190 190 Purchased Services 27,810 80,280 59,000 59,000 Gross County Cost $ 56,640 $ 80,450 $ 85,310 $ 85,310 Revenue 56,640 80,450 85,310 85,310 Net County Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Budget Positions - - - - - - - - SUMMARY OF CHANGES: No significant changes in this program. OBJECTIVES: 1)Administer program in accordance with Older American Act Requirements. PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Work Outputs Care giver Support- units of services 3,300 2,400 1,900 Grandparents raising grandkids - clients served 600 500 300 Efficiency Measures Per capita cost $0.25 $0.34 $0.35 Effectiveness Measures (desired results) Maintain requirements of grant Yes Yes Yes FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. BOARD ACTION: Approved as recommended. 368 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: HUMAN SERVICES FUND BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Supplemental Foods - - 60000-2676 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: This program distributes USDA commodities to low income eligible mothers, infants and children, and elderly of the County. ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED FINAL RESOURCES LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 1,730 $ 0 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 Supplies 1,110,270 1,220,131 1,220,130 1,220,130 Purchased Services 220,740 224,728 198,500 198,500 Gross County Cost $ 1,332,740 $ 1,444,859 $ 1,428,630 $ 1,428,630 Revenue 1,332,740 1,444,859 1,428,630 1,428,630 Net County Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Budget Positions - - - - - - - - SUMMARY OF CHANGES: No significant changes in this program. OBJECTIVES: 1) Administer program in accordance with USDA rules and regulations; and 2) Provide services to eligible clients as specified in the USDA contract approved by the Board. PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Work Outputs Clients served/month 4,400 4,400 4,400 Efficiency Measures Per capita cost $5.88 $6.19 $5.86 Effectiveness Measures (desired results) Maintain or increase average monthly participation rate Yes Yes Yes FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. BOARD ACTION:Approved as recommended. 369 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: HUMAN SERVICES FUND BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Community Services Block Grant- - 60000-2678 95 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: This grant provides a range of community services to the low income and elderly of the community. It's focus has been on transportation in the rural sites. ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED FINAL RESOURCES LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 92,600 $ 43,178 $ 65,690 $ 65,690 Purchased Services 176,530 120,952 213,580 213,580 Gross County Cost $ 269,130 $ 164,130 $ 279,270 $ 279,270 Revenue 269,130 164,130 279,270 279,270 Net County Cost $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Budget Positions - - - - - - - - SUMMARY OF CHANGES: The Department will include emergency assistance support for the 2008-09 grant year. The amounts for the 2008-09 budget year do not include the 2007-08 roll- forward. OBJECTIVES: 1)Administer program as defined by DOL rules and regulations; and 2) Provide services to eligible clients as specified in the CSBG plan approved by the Board. PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Work Outputs Transportation to rural elderly 5,250 6,000 6,100 Volunteer support 1,500 1,500 1,500 Employment opportunities low-income unskilled adult labor force 2,330 2,330 2,330 Efficiency Measures Per capita cost $1.19 $0.70 $1.15 Effectiveness Measures (desired results) Work output goals maintained Yes Yes Yes FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. BOARD ACTION: Approved as recommended. 370 SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS Special Revenue Funds are established to account for taxes or other earmarked revenue of the county which finance specified activities as required by law or administrative action. CONTINGENCY FUND: The Contingency Fund is funded at the level of $7,400,000. Given the uncertainty of state and federal funding and tax collections, it is recommended that this amount, coupled with the approximate $2,750,000 carry-over fund balance in the General Fund be retained. SOLID WASTE FUND: The Solid Waste Fund is funded at the anticipated revenue level of fees at $660,000, with an anticipated beginning fund balance of$500,000. Half of the funds are committed to the Household Hazardous Waste Program ($330,000). A total of$330,000 is designated for roads impacted by landfills. CONSERVATION TRUST FUND: The Conservation Trust Fund is budgeted at$425,000 based upon the anticipated operating costs for 2009. The budget reflects funding of Island Grove Park only. EMERGENCY RESERVE FUND: The Emergency Reserve Fund is established per Amendment One(TABOR),passed November 3, 1992. The amendment requires that an emergency reserve be created to be used for declared emergencies only. It also requires each local government to reserve one percent or more for 1993, two percent or more for 1994, and three percent or more for all later years of the fiscal year spending, excluding bonded debt service. Caused reserves apply to the next year's reserve. A reserve of $5,000,000 has been established for 2009, which is greater than the required three percent of fiscal spending. 371 CONSERVATION TRUST FUND SUMMARY OF REVENUES 200 2008 2009 2009 2009 Fund Org Acct Account Title Budget Request Recommend Final TAXES 2200 73700 4332 LOTTERY 396,000 420,000 420,000 420,00( MISCELLANEOUS 2200 73700 4610 EARNINGS ON INVESTMENTS 9,000 5,000 5,000 5,00( TOTAL CONSERVATION TRUST FUND 405,000 425,000 425,000 425,00( 372 CONSERVATION TRUST FUND SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES 2009 2008 2009 2009 2009 Fund Org Expenditure Function Budget Request Recommend Final 2200 73700 CONSERVATION TRUST 405,000 425,000 425,000 425,000 TOTAL CONSERVATION TRUST FUND 405.000 425.000 425.000 425.000 373 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: CONSERVATION TRUST FUND BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Conservation Trust Fund -- 2200-73700 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: Accounts for revenue received from the State of Colorado to be used for the acquisition, development, and maintenance of new conservation sites within Weld County. ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED FINAL RESOURCES LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Supplies 0 0 0 0 Purchased Services 396,667 392,599 401,601 401,601 Fixed Charges 0 0 0 0 Capital 0 12,401 23,399 23,399 Gross County Cost $ 396,667 $ 405,000 $ 425,000 $ 425,000 Revenue 431,372 405,000 425,000 425,000 Net County Cost $ -34,705 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Budget Positions - - - - - - - - SUMMARY OF CHANGES: Revenues from the Colorado Lottery are being projected at$420,000 and$5,000 from interest earnings. Island Grove Park will have a gross cost of$490,601, less than $90,000 in revenue,for a net of$401,601, up$9,002 from 2008. Increase is due to increased gas costs to heat the building. The new fee schedule will generate more funds to offset the costs. A total of$23,399 is allocated for capital improvements to the buildings. Since 2002, the Missile Site Park has been funded in the General Fund. OBJECTIVES: See criteria following Administrative Recommendation. 374 CONSERVATION TRUST FUND (CONTINUED) 2200-73700 PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Work Outputs Island Grove Park Visitors 411,000 412,000 415,000 Efficiency Measures Per capita cost (county support) $1.68 $1.74 $1.65 Cost Per Visitor $0.92 $0.98 $0.97 Effectiveness Measures (desired results) Percentage of increased use 1% 1% 1% Percentage of increased revenue from user fees to support parks 0% 2% 15% FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Historically, the following is the amount of money received annually since the lottery started: 1983 $ 194,698 1984 195,304 1985 151,033 1986 138,069 1987 162,736 1988 154,074 1989 130,764 1990 136,726 1991 200,103 1992 220,219 1993 264,371 1994 205,534 1995 327,162 1996 312,024 1997 356,262 1998 363,962 1999 286,971 2001 358,802 2002 391,780 2003 385,070 2004 361,926 2005 333,837 2006 453,233 2007 431,372 375 CONSERVATION TRUST FUND (CONTINUED) 2200-73700 FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION(CONTINUED): The funds have been used for maintenance and development of Island Grove Park and the Missile Site Park, with the exception of the following items: Entity Purpose Amount 1983: Greeley Civic Auditorium $ 141,464 1984: Greeley Civic Auditorium $ 143,000 1985: Greeley Civic Auditorium $ 90,000 1986: Greeley Civic Auditorium $ 51,500 LaSalle Community Center 10,000 Ault Park System 7,500 Dacono Park Improvements 3,000 Windsor Park Improvements 6,000 Ft. Lupton Pearsin Park Sports Complex 10,000 Independence Stampede Headquarters Facility 5,000 Since 1987 all funds have gone to the two county parks. Beginning in 2002 only Island Grove Park has been funded. In 1984,the Board adopted the following criteria, in priority order,for the use and allocation of Weld County lottery funds. This policy remains in force today: 1. To maintain and develop the two existing county parks. 2. Projects must enhance the quality of life for the citizens of Weld County. 3. Projects must contribute to or compliment the economic development activities of Weld County. 4. Projects must have an area impact or significance. 5. Funds used for local community projects must have substantial local support. 6. Outside of existing county parks, no operating funds shall be contributed to projects. 376 CONSERVATION TRUST FUND (CONTINUED) 2200-73700 FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION(CONTINUED): Capital of$23,399 is requested for minor projects. Recommend approval. ITEM REQUESTED RECOMMENDED Undesignated $ 23,399 $ 23,399 $ 23,399 $ 23,399 BOARD ACTION: Approved as recommended. 377 CONTINGENCY FUND SUMMARY OF REVENUES 200 2008 2009 2009 2009 Fund Org Acct Account Title Budget Request Recommend Final TAXES 2300 90300 4112 CURRENT PROPERTY TAXES 2,000,000 0 0 TOTAL CONTINGENCY FUND 2,000.000 0 0 378 CONTINGENT FUND SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES 2009 2008 2009 2009 2009 Fund Org Expenditure Function Budget Request Recommend Final 2300 90300 CONTINGENT 7,400,000 7,400,000 7,400,000 7,400,000 TOTAL CONTINGENT FUND 7.400.000 7.400.000 7.400.000 7.400.000 379 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: CONTINGENCY FUND BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Contingency Fund -- 2300-90300 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: The Contingency Fund exists to cover reasonably unforeseen expenditures or revenue short-falls. ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED FINAL RESOURCES LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Supplies 0 0 0 0 Purchased Services 0 0 0 0 Fixed Charges 0 7,400,000 7,400,000 7,400,000 Capital 0 0 0 0 Gross County Cost $ 0 $ 7,400,000 $ 7,400,000 $ 7,400,000 Revenue/Fund Bal. 2,597,291 5,400,000 7,400,000 7,400,000 Net County Cost $ -2,597,291 $ 2,000,000 $ 0 $ 0 Budget Positions - - - - - - - - SUMMARY OF CHANGES: The Contingency Fund is funded at the level of $7,400,000 by a carry-over fund balance of$7,400,000. OBJECTIVES: n/a FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the amount of $7,400,000 and the Emergency Reserve of$5,000,000 provide adequate reserves for the county and should be retained. BOARD ACTION: Approved as recommended. 380 EMERGENCY RESERVE FUND SUMMARY OF REVENUES 200 2008 2009 2009 2009 Fund Org Acct Account Title Budget Request Recommend Final TAXES 53100 4112 CURRENT PROPERTY TAXES 0 0 0 ( TOTAL EMERGENCY RESERVE FUND 0 0 0 381 EMERGENCY RESERVE FUND SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES 2009 2008 2009 2009 2009 Fund Org Expenditure Function Budget Request Recommend Final 2400 53100 EMERGENCY RESERVE 5,000,000 5,000,000 5,000,000 5,000,000 TOTA EMERGENCY RESERVE FUND 5,000.000 5,000.000 5.000.000 5.000.000 382 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: EMERGENCY RESERVE FUND BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Emergency Reserve -- 2400-53100 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: The Emergency Reserve Fund is established per Amendment One (TABOR), passed November 3, 1992, which requires that an emergency reserve be established to be used for declared emergencies only, and that each local government shall reserve for 1993 1 percent or more, for 1994 2 percent or more, and for all later years 3 percent or more of the fiscal year spending, excluding bonded debt service. Caused reserves apply to the next year's reserve. ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED FINAL RESOURCES LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Supplies 0 0 0 0 Purchased Services 0 0 0 0 Fixed Charges 0 5,000,000 5,000,000 5,000,000 Capital 0 0 0 0 Gross County Cost $ 0 $ 5,000,000 $ 5,000,000 $ 5,000,000 Revenue/Fund Bal. 0 0 0 0 Net County Cost $ 0 $ 5,000,000 $ 5,000,000 $ 5,000,000 Budget Positions - - - - - - - - SUMMARY OF CHANGES: The emergency reserve is funded at $5,000,000, which meets the three percent fiscal year spending requirement. OBJECTIVES: n/a FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that $5,000,000 be funded to comply with the TABOR Amendment requirement passed in 1992. Reserve is funded from carry-over fund balance. BOARD ACTION:Approved as recommended. 383 SOLID WASTE FUND SUMMARY OF REVENUES 200 2008 2009 2009 2009 Fund Org Acct Account Title Budget Request Recommend Final CHARGE FOR SERVICES 2700 90200 4410 CHARGE FOR SERVICES 635,000 660,000 660,000 660,00( TOTAL SOLID WASTE FUND 635,000 660,000 660,000 660,00( 384 SOLID WASTE FUND SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES 2009 2008 2009 2009 2009 Fund Orq Expenditure Function Budget Request Recommend Final 2700 21240 TRANSFER 61,892 0 0 0 2700 90200 SOLID WASTE 440,000 330,000 330,000 330,000 2700 90200 TRANSFER 707,377 330,000 330,000 330,000 TOTAL SOLID WASTE FUND 1.229.269 660.000 660.000 660.000 385 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: SOLID WASTE BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Code Enforcement -- 2700-21240 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: This budget accounts for code enforcement for littering, illegal dumping, and roadside trash pick-up program. ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED FINAL RESOURCES LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Supplies 0 0 0 0 Purchased Services 453 0 0 0 Fixed Charges 81,892 81,892 0 0 Gross County Cost $ 82,345 $ 81,892 $ 0 $ 0 Revenue 0 0 0 0 Net County Cost $ 82,345 $ 81,892 $ 0 $ 0 Budget Positions - - - - - - - - SUMMARY OF CHANGES: The Code Enforcement function has been combined with the Animal Control function in the Sheriff's Office. As a result of the drop in revenue from solid waste fees, this budget unit, starting in 2009, is funded in the General Fund. See budget unit number 1000-21230 for a detailed discussion of the change in the program. OBJECTIVES: 1)Mitigate the impact of solid waste sites in Weld County;and 2)Provide roadside trash pick-up and enforcement. 386 CODE ENFORCEMENT (CONTINUED) 2700-21240 PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Work Outputs Number of Complaints 790 800 n/a Efficiency Measures Per capita cost (county support) $0.361 $0.351 $0.00 Effectiveness Measures (desired results) Reduced roadside litter 90% 90% n/a FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. BOARD ACTION: Approved as recommended. 387 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: SOLID WASTE BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Solid Waste Fund -- 2700-90200 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: This fund accounts for revenue received from a surcharge on dumping fees at solid waste disposal sites to combat environmental problems, promote trash clean- up, provide for the household hazardous materials program, and to further improve and develop landfill sites within the county. ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED FINAL RESOURCES LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Supplies 0 0 0 0 Purchased Services 141,378 1,147,377 660,000 660,000 Fixed Charges 1,166,673 0 0 0 Capital 0 0 0 0 Gross County Cost $ 1,308,051 $ 1,147,377 $ 660,000 $ 660,000 Revenue 1,148,263 635,000 660,000 660,000 Net County Cost $ 159,788 $ 512,377 $ 0 $ 0 Budget Positions - - - - - - - - SUMMARY OF CHANGES: Due to the annexation of the Erie Laidlaw landfill, the revenue from that site($740,000 annually),will not be received after 2007. The Department of Public Health and Environment costs for the Household Hazardous Waste program will be $330,000. $330,000 is requested for road projects to mitigate landfill impacts. OBJECTIVES: 1) Mitigate the impact of solid waste sites in Weld County; and 2) Provide Household Hazardous Materials Program. 388 SOLID WASTE FUND (CONTINUED) 2700-90200 PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Work Outputs Landfill Inspections 45 45 45 Household Hazardous Material (HHM) $707,377 $707,377 $330,000 Surcharge Collected $375,000 $635,000 $660,000 Efficiency Measures Per capita cost (collected) $6.07 $5.27 $2.71 Per capita HHM cost $3.12 $3.03 $1.35 Effectiveness Measures (desired results) Community Clean-ups 4 2 2 Increased volume of HHM diverted from landfills 10% 10% 10% FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. There are no undesignated funds in the 2009 budget to mitigate impacts of landfills, such as road access, cleanups, and transfer stations. A $500,000 fund balance also exists for the same needs if required. As indicated above, revenues have been held conservative. Due to the annexation of the second Erie landfill,the county has lost the revenue from that site. Erie will pay approximately$13,000 for Health Department inspections of the landfill in Erie, and for costs to offset the receiving of household hazardous wastes from Erie residents. BOARD ACTION: Approved as recommended. 389 Attirl Ink COLORADO 390 SEVEN YEAR TREND Capital Expenditures 18 --- 16.40 16 14 13.21 12 10 co z O J J_ f 8 -.. _ _ ---__..__ _.___. _--- ------- -__... - __7.54--- _ 6.63 - 6.36 6 3.79 4 - 2.26 2 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 391 CAPITAL EXPENDITURES FUND SUMMARY The Capital Expenditures Fund was established to budget for financial resources used for the acquisition or improvement of the capital facilities of the county. A detailed Long Range Capital Plan for 2009-2013 is presented in this section and relates to the specifics of the 2009 capital project budget. The Capital Expenditures Fund accounts for various capital improvement projects for county buildings. The 2009 program is funded at $16,400,000, with $8,000,000 from property tax, $300,000 from capital expansion fees, $6,000,000 from Energy Impact Grants, and$100,000 from interest. Anticipated projects include $8,000,000 for a Regional Crime Lab Building, $5,000,000 for a Community Corrections Facility, $250,000 for remodels and upgrades of Public Works facilities, and $100,000 for special projects. No carry-over beginning fund balance is anticipated, and $3,050,000 ending reserve fund balance is anticipated at the end of 2009. Capital projects impacting the 2009 and future years operational costs include the additional Social Services Building which will add approximately $187,500 annually, with the majority of the costs covered by Human Services grant programs. The Administration Building will add about$115,000 in operational costs in 2012. The addition of a 20,000 square foot administrative building at the Southwest Weld County Service Center will add operational costs for the building of $95,000 in 2013. The Regional Crime Lab will add $185,000 in operating costs in 2010 that will be shared by the participating agencies. The Community Corrections Facility will add $185,000 in operating costs, which will be totally paid for by the Community Corrections grant programs. Staff for the operations of the facilities will come from shifting staff from departments in Greeley offices and operations. The special projects and Public Works facilities projects are primarily cosmetic enhancements to buildings that will not impact operating costs, but will improve the appearance and functionality of the buildings involved. 392 CAPITAL EXPENDITURE FUND SUMMARY OF REVENUES 200 2008 2009 2009 2009 Fund Org Acct Account Title Budget Request Recommend Final TAXES 4000 17500 4112 CURRENT PROPERTY TAXES 6,000,000 8,000,000 8,000,000 8,000,00( INTERGOVERNMENTAL 4000 17500 4340 GRANTS 750,000 8,000,000 8,000,000 8,000,00( MISCELLANEOUS 4000 17500 4610 EARNINGS ON INVESTMENTS 35,000 100,000 100,000 100,00( FEES 4000 17500 4730 OTHER FEES 250,000 300,000 300,000 300,00( TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURE FUND 7,035,000 16,400,000 16,400,000 16,400,00( 393 CAPITAL EXPENDITURES FUND SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES 2009 2008 2009 2009 2009 Fund Org Expenditure Function Budget Request Recommend Final 4000 17500 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT AND ACQUISITION 7,535,000 16,400,000 16,400,000 16,400,000 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURE FUND 7,535.000 16.400.000 16.400.000 16.400.000 394 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: CAPITAL EXPENDITURES BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Capital Expenditures -- 4000-17500 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: Capital projects for general county use. Created in accordance with C. R. S. 29-1-301(1.2) April 5, 1984. Formerly Public Works - County Buildings Fund (Fund 33). ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED FINAL RESOURCES LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Supplies 0 0 0 0 Purchased Services 0 0 0 0 Capital 9,367,309 6,375,000 16,400,000 16,400,000 Gross County Cost $ 9,367,309 $ 6,375,000 $ 16,400,000 $ 16,400,000 Revenue 11,949,234 500,000 8,400,000 8,400,000 Fund Balance (8,145,434) 0 0 0 Net County Cost $ 5,563,509 $ 5,875,000 $ 8,000,000 $ 8,000,000 Budget Positions -- -- -- -- SUMMARY OF CHANGES: The Capital Expenditures Fund accounts for various capital improvement projects for county buildings. The 2009 program is funded at $16,400,000, with $8,000,000 from property tax, $300,000 from capital expansion fees, $8,000,000 from Energy Impact Grants,and$100,000 from interest. Anticipated projects include$8,000,000 for a Regional Crime Lab Building, $5,000,000 for a Community Corrections Facility, $250,000 for remodels and upgrades of Public Works facilities, and $100,000 for special projects. No carry-over beginning fund balance is anticipated, and $3,050,000 ending reserve fund balance is anticipated at the end of 2009. OBJECTIVES: n/a FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Budget reflects the 2009 funding level of the Proposed Long Range Capital Plan for 2009 - 2013. The actual plan is on the pages immediately following. BOARD ACTION: Approved as recommended. 395 el*:, . 111k WELD COUNTY LONG RANGE CAPITAL PROJECTS FIVE-YEAR PLAN 2009 - 2013 Presented By: Donald D. Warden, Director Finance and Administration September, 2008 397 LONG RANGE CAPITAL PROJECTS FIVE YEAR PLAN 2009 - 2013 INTRODUCTION: Section 14-3 of the Weld County Home Rule Charter provides: "The Board may require that the Director of Finance and Purchasing submit, at the time of submission of the annual budget, a five-year capital improvements program and budget. Such program shall include recommended projects, construction schedule, estimate of cost,anticipated revenue sources, methods of financing, and such other information as may be required." This five-year plan projects capital improvements for 2009 - 2013. The recommended program for capital construction is intended as a guideline to be adjusted by the Board of County Commissioners on an annual basis. It represents flexible goals for organizing solutions to county program needs, and it is intended to provide the Board of County Commissioners with the perspective for making fiscal policy decisions. Annual modifications in the plan will reflect necessary adjustments and priorities, changes in programs, and readjustments of other county fiscal requirements. This report has four(4) sections: 1. Introduction 2. Financing Alternatives 3. 2009 - 2013 Five-year Plan 4. 2009 Budgetary Impact The section on financing recommends a program for funding the next five years' capital construction. This section lists the various sources of revenue currently available to the county, and the alternatives available for financing the remainder of the capital projects program. The 2009-2013 five-year plan section provides a list of recommended projects and the time schedule for the next five fiscal years. Additionally, it provides justification for the recommendation and attempts to enumerate problems and recommended solutions for the capital improvements program over the next five years. The project section describes each recommended project, and provides information on the existing situation, the proposed solution, and the financing plan for each project. The last section of the report provides a recommended 2009 budget for the capital construction program. It provides specific detail regarding each recommended project and the impact on the 2009 county budget. 398 FINANCING ALTERNATIVES 399 FINANCING Overview: There are a number of ways to finance capital improvement projects. Some of the most common methods are: 1. Pay as you go: Pay as you go is a method of financing capital projects with current revenues -- paying cash instead of borrowing against future revenues. Pay as you go has several advantages. First, it saves interest cost. Second, pay as you go protects borrowing capacity for unforeseen major outlays that are beyond any current year's capacity. Third, when coupled with regular, steady completion of capital improvements and good documentation and publicity, pay as you go fosters favorable bond ratings when long term financing is undertaken. Finally, the technique avoids the inconvenience and considerable cost associated with marketing of bond issues, advisors, counsel, printing, etc. However, there are practical and theoretical disadvantages to a pay as you go policy. First, pay as you go puts a heavy burden on the project year. Second, it creates awkward fluctuating expenditure cycles which do not occur with extended financing. Third, a long life asset should be paid for by its users throughout its normal life rather than all at once by those who may not have the use of it for the full term. Finally, when inflation is driving up construction costs, it may be cheaper to borrow and pay today's prices rather than wait and pay tomorrow's. 2. All borrowing policy: An all borrowing policy or a substantial reliance on debt financing is another approach. The annual available resources could be used entirely for debt service with the size of the annual resources setting the limit on the amount that could be borrowed. 3. Capital reserve: A capital reserve plan is an approach where the annual resources available could be accumulated in one or more capital reserve funds, the amounts invested, and when any funds become adequate to pay for a proposed project, the fund could be expended. This is a good approach when a county has a capital requirement which can wait. Accumulation of the necessary capital funds over a period of time is a feasible approach,assuming a relatively stable construction dollar. HB1111 passed in 1982 specifically provides for a capital improvements trust fund for capital reserves. 400 4. Partial pay as you go policy: A partial pay as you go policy is a common approach. Some of the annual resources would be used to finance capital improvements directly, and the remainder would go for supporting a debt program. Even if a local government pursues a borrowing policy, an initial down payment out of current revenues is a possibility. A customary five to ten percent down is a limited pay as you go policy, and assures that the voters authorizing the approval will make a cash contribution so all of the burden will not be postponed. 5. Joint financing: An ever increasing number of cities and counties are benefitting from joint development of a project. The construction of a city/county office building and recreational areas are examples. This avenue of funding and planning capital projects normally is advantageous to both jurisdictions. 6. Lease/Purchase: Local governments can utilize lease/purchase methods for needed public works projects by having it constructed by a private company or authority. The facility is then leased by the jurisdiction on an annual or a monthly rental. At the end of the lease period, the title to the facility can be conveyed to the jurisdiction without any future payments. The rental over the years will have paid the total original cost plus interest. This method has been used successfully in a number of jurisdictions. The utilization of a building authority would fall under this category of financing. Numerous considerations are involved in the selection of the foregoing approaches, or some combination thereof: 1. Political realities may preclude utilization of one or more of the above alternatives. For example, the passage of general obligation bonds as a debt financing mechanism has not met recent success at the polling places in most jurisdictions. 2. The pay as you go concept has three distinct advantages. A. It provides great flexibility to the county for future periods of economic recession or depression but does not accumulate large fixed-charge costs. B. It avoids the payment of interest charges. C. It imposes upon public officials the full political responsibility for levy of the taxes necessary to pay the local share of such projects. 3. The debt financing approach has the advantage of spreading the cost over a generation of current users of public facilities, thereby imposing upon each a significant portion of the cost of each project. 4. In an inflationary period, one must take into account the extent to which prepayment for capital outlay is warranted, when the opportunity for repayment of the principal and interest in dollars that are less expensive can be arranged. 401 5. During periods of rapid rise in costs, the time delay necessary to accumulate down payments or full pay as you go resources invites higher costs which may wipe out most, if not all, of the advantages of non-payment of interest. In the five-year capital projects plan, a combination of funding methods will be recommended to finance capital construction in an attempt to balance the economy of a payment in full program with the fairness of sharing the burden among present and future taxpayers. This recommended financial program reflects consideration of many factors, including the availability of cash, anticipated interest rates at the time of construction, and projected inflationary cost increases that would result from project delays. 402 DEBT FINANCING Before discussing specific types of borrowing, it is appropriate to review some of the basic constitutional statutory provisions which generally are applicable to debt financing. Article XI, Section 6 of the Colorado Constitution provides that no debt may be created by a political subdivision of the state, unless the question of incurring such debt has been approved by a majority of the qualified electorate voting. Any obligation paid, or contracted to be paid, out of a fund that is a product of a tax levy is a debt within the means of the Constitution (Trinidad vs. Haxby, 136 Colorado 168, 315 p 2d 204 -- 1957). In addition to voter approval, Article XI, Section 6 requires the debt be incurred by adoption of a legislative measure which is irrevocable until the indebtedness is fully paid or discharged. The ordinance must: 1. Set forth the purpose for which the bond proceeds will be applied, and 2. Provide for the levy of the tax which, together with such other revenues as may be pledged, will be sufficient to pay the principal and interest of the debt. The Constitution delegates to the Legislature the duty to establish statutory limitations on the incurrence of debt. The total amount of debt which a county may incur may not exceed 3 percent of the assessed value in the county, which is slightly over$108 million dollars in Weld County. Section 4 of Article X, Section 20 (TABOR Amendment) requires voter approval for any form of multi-year debt. It states that an election is required: "Except for the refinancing of district bonded debt at a lower interest rate or adding new employees to existing district pension plans, creation of any multiple-fiscal year direct or indirect district debt or other financial obligation whatsoever without adequate present cash reserves pledged irrevocable and held for payments in all future fiscal years." In addition to the state statute, Section 14-6 of the Weld County Home Rule Charter specifies: "The incurring of indebtedness by the county and the issuance of evidences of such indebtedness shall be authorized, made and executed in accordance with the laws of the state, including the borrowing of money to fund county projects, the pledging of project revenues and repayment thereof, and the issuance of revenue warrants, or revenue bonds, or other forms of evidence of such obligations." Before discussing specific types of bonds, it is appropriate to review some of the general characteristics of bonds. Bonds mature serially, that is, a portion of the principal is retired over the entire term of the bond issue. Interest on municipal bonds is free from Federal Income Tax which is an important feature to prospective purchasers. The term or the length of time to maturity of municipal bonds can vary considerably. Generally, the last maturing bond comes due ten to thirty years from the date of issue. Normally, the longer the maturity of the bonds, the higher the yields or return on investment demanded by the market price. Thus, a bond issue that runs thirty years will pay a higher net effective interest rate than a bond issue that runs twenty years. 403 General Obligation Bonds: General obligation bonds are secured by a pledge of the full faith, credit and taxing power of the county. The county is obligated to levy sufficient taxes each year to pay the principal and interest of the bond issue. Consequently, general obligation bonds are a debt subject to the constitutional and statutory provisions discussed earlier. Because the issue of general obligation bond pledges its full faith and credit and agrees to levy the ad valorem taxes necessary to repay the principal and interest of the bond, it is generally agreed to be a more secure investment than other types of bonds. Thus, the major advantage of general obligation financing is the low rate of interest as compared to the interest of other types of bonds. The law permits general obligation bonds to have a thirty-year term; however, general obligation bond issues usually have terms of twenty years or less. General obligation bonds, in addition to being secured by full faith and credit of the issuer, may provide additional security by pledging certain available revenues. The major disadvantage of general obligation bonds is the fact that it does require voter approval prior to issuance. Voter resistance to increased taxes may prevent a successful bond election. Revenue Bonds: Revenue bonds are not a debt in the constitutional sense. They are secured by the revenue derived from the project to be constructed, not by pledge of the full faith, credit, and taxing authority of the county. Projects typically financed by revenue bonds include airports, stadiums, and park facilities. Under the TABOR Amendment, revenue bonds can only be used for enterprise funds and operations. Although it may seem possible to pledge any non-tax revenues for payment of revenue bonds, there should be a relationship between the type of revenue pledged for payment of the bonds and the project to be financed. Although revenue bonds need not comply with the constitutional statutory provisions generally applicable to a debt,there are several statutory provisions which may affect the issuance of certain types of revenue bonds and the statutes should be consulted for specific provisions regarding the issue of revenue bonds if this method is considered. Revenue bonds are considered to be less secure than general obligation bonds because of the inability of the issuer to levy taxes to assure the payment of principal and interest. Thus, there is normally a higher interest rate on revenue bonds. The term of revenue bonds is often beyond twenty years, frequently as long as thirty years. The concept of issuing revenue bonds is based on the theory that certain projects which benefit only certain individuals should be self-supporting and should be paid for by the user of that project rather than the populace as a whole. Thus, airport revenue bonds are paid for by air travelers and airlines and parking revenue bonds are paid for by users, etc. In order for a county to issue a revenue bond, the system which generates the revenues to repay the principal and interest of the bond must: 1. Have a good operating history documented by audited figures. 2. Reflect good debt service coverage through use of a feasibility study completed by a recognized expert in the field. 404 In analyzing a revenue bond issue for underwriting, an investment banker will look not only at operating statistics and coverages, but also at more basic elements, such as the necessity of the service, control over competition, and delinquency procedures. Revenue bonds are becoming more popular because they do not require voter approval and do not apply in statutory debt limits. Leases: A less traditional method of financing county facilities is a lease arrangement. A lease is executed with the county, which gives the county the option to purchase the equipment or facility during the term of the lease. All or part of the lease payments may be applied to the purchase prices. A bona fide lease option agreement is not a debt; however, an installment purchase program is a debt. A bona fide lease/option agreement is characterized by two factors: 1. Annual rental payments with automatic renewal of the lease unless terminated by either party, and 2. No obligation on the part of the local government to purchase the property if the lease is terminated. Also, some court cases indicate the annual rental must be paid from non-property tax revenues to avoid the lease being considered a general obligation. Upon exercise of the option, the local government obtains full legal title to the property. Leases of this nature are distinctively different from more conventional means of financing. Of primary importance is the security which underlies the lease period. It is not a promise to levy taxes or a pledge of revenues from the system. Rather, it is usually a promise to pay only one year at a time, with an implied intention to continue payment until ownership is transferred. As ultimate security, the holder of the lease may look to the asset which is being leased in the event of a default. There is little statutory or judicial guidance in the area of leases of this type, and the obligation to continue lease payments until title transfers is a moral, rather than a legal obligation. As a consequence, the underwriting or placement of a lease is more difficult than the underwriting of conventional bonds. The term of the leases generally are short, usually from seven to ten years. Because the security underlying the lease is not good compared with conventional financing, interest rates on leases are higher. Building Authority: A building authority is a non-profit corporation which generally is formed at the request of the governing body of the county or local jurisdiction,which also appoints the Board of Directors of the corporation. Weld County created such an authority in 1987 named the Weld County Finance Corporation. The directors are the Director of Finance and Administration, County Attorney, and Director of Public Works, each appointed for ten year terms. 405 The building authority issues its own bonds to finance a facility. To achieve the same lower interest rates that traditional municipal bonds enjoy, the building authority must obtain a ruling from the Internal Revenue Service that the interest on the authority's bonds is exempt from Federal Income Tax. Such an exemption is granted if the IRS finds the authority's bonds are issued on behalf of a political subdivision, which is determined based upon the following factors as detailed in IRS Revenue Ruling 63-20. 1. The authority engages in activities which are essentially public in nature. 2. The corporation is not organized for profit. 3. The corporate income does not inure to the benefit of any private person. 4. The political subdivision has a beneficial interest in the corporation, while the indebtedness is outstanding, and it obtains full legal title to the property on the retirement of the debt. 5. The corporation has been approved by the political subdivision which has approved the specific obligation of the corporation. Like municipal bonds, bonds issued by a corporation usually are subject to registration and other requirements of the Securities Act of 1933 and the Security Exchange Act of 1934. After receiving a favorable ruling from the IRS, a "no action" letter should be secured from the Security and Exchange Commission, exempting the authority's bonds from these requirements. The authority then issues bonds pledging the annual rental payments as security. After issuance of bonds and construction of the facilities, the authority leases the facilities to the county. Again, this must be a bona fide lease and possess all the elements discussed under Lease/Purchase. The bonds of a building authority are similar to municipal leases in the manner in which they are viewed by investors. As with a simple municipal lease, building authority bonds are less secure than general obligation or revenue bonds. As a result, bonds issued through a building authority bear higher interest than more secure issues. Certificates of Participation (COP) may be issued in the same manner as bonds. As a practical matter the COP is the same as a bond, except from a legal point of view, the COP is evidencing assignment of proportionate undivided interests in rights to receive certain revenues in the form of a lease or rental amount for the purpose of providing funding for capital improvements. The lease and COP do not constitute a general obligation or other indebtedness of the county within the meaning of any constitutional, statutory or home rule charter debt limitation. The lease is a year-to-year obligation. The use of Certificates of Participation(COP)has been the only debt vehicle Weld County has ever used in the implementation of its debt policy options. The only COP issued by Weld County was done in 1997, and was paid off August 1, 2007. No outstanding debt exists for Weld County. 406 BUILDING AUTHORITY FINANCE The Philosophy: Tax-exempt financing is available through a building authority with the issuance of bonds when the facilities financed are for public purposes and the benefit is to the sponsoring public entity. The Building Authority: A building authority is a Colorado non-profit corporation created by the county itself. The county adopts a resolution calling for the creation of the Building Authority and directing counsel to draw articles of incorporation and by-laws in compliance with Colorado Statutes. A board of directors is formed. The board may consist of County Commissioners or administrative personnel or individuals not associated with any public entity. The Weld County Finance Corporation, created in 1987, consists of the Director of Finance/Administration, County Attorney, and Director of General Services as directors. Tax-Exemption of Interest: Once the non-profit corporation is created, the tax-exempt nature of interest paid on the corporation's bonds must be assured. A revenue ruling is requested from the Internal Revenue Service on the non-profit status of the corporation pursuant to Internal Revenue Code, 103(a)1 and Revenue Ruling 63-20, and on the tax-exempt status of interest paid. Such an application involves considerable work and a detailed analysis of the situation which is presented to the Internal Revenue Service. The application includes information as to public purpose, the county, the agency using the facilities, the proposed lease terms, terms of title reversion to the county and the proposed method of financing. Corporate Bonds and the S.E.C.: As corporate bonds are subject to registration requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission, a "no action" letter must be obtained from the S.E.C. In essence, the S.E.C. says that no action will be taken if the bonds of the building authority/non-profit corporation are not registered. The Purchase Contract: Once the building authority is created with powers to act, it may enter into a contract to purchase the facility. The contract should be subject to: 1. A favorable revenue ruling from the Internal Revenue Service. 2. Receipt of an S.E.C. "no action" letter. 3. Finalization of financing. 407 The Bond Issue: When all legal and tax questions are answered the building authority may issue bonds for the purchase of the facility. Normally the bonds are sold directly to an underwriter who then resells the bonds to the ultimate investor. The bonds that are issued will be an obligation of the building authority only and not a debt obligation of the county. The County Lease: Upon the issuance of the bonds and the purchase of the building by the building authority, the county can lease the building from the authority. The lease would be from year-to-year with automatic renewal unless otherwise terminated. A county lease for any period in excess of one year constitutes a debt and must be approved by voters. The Bond Security: The security of the bond holders may be only in a pledge of lease revenues by the authority. The bond holders may also have a first mortgage lien on the building. The combination of the two results in a more secure bond and a correspondingly lower rate of interest. Partial Seller Financing: Depending on factors such as the seller's motivation, whether there is an existing loan on the building, and negotiations,a bond issue can be for only the amount necessary fora down payment. The sellers can carry back the balance, receiving installment sale tax benefits on the capital gains. A revenue ruling would be required, however, interest paid on a promissory note to the seller may also be tax exempt. The total cost to the county and the building authority then may be substantially lower on this basis. 408 COMPLETED CAPITAL PROJECTS 2003- 2007 Actual Actual Actual Actual Actual Requirements Total 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 Centennial Complex $ 4,378,072 $ 260,851 $2,457,424 $1,009,526 $ 21,400 $ 628,87 Courthouse 411,147 48,735 264,443 97,96! West Annex 190,633 179,783 10,850 Downtown Parking / Future Expansion 790,212 748,333 41,879 Planning Building 495,727 495,727 Grader Sheds 331,938 151,926 180,01; Human Services 34,455 34,455 Health Department 17,576 17,576 Island Grove 969,493 136,704 34,717 44,627 753,445 Jail 24,762,589 5,053,255 265,562 269,087 8,182,712 10,991,97: Sheriffs Admin Bldg 32,222 32,222 No. County 2,087,561 178,554 1,909,007 Complex Public Works 219,340 101,959 53,010 64,37 Social Services 518,469 17,546 500,92: Southwest Complex 23,917 23,917 Southeast Complex 5,036,889 206,432 1,371,376 2,492,806 966,27! Training Center 11,068 11,068 North Admin Bldg 2,128,789 929,713 1,199,076 Alternative Use Bldg 1,887,721 1,887,72 Building & Grounds Headquarters 755,685 755,68, Miscellaneous 1,216,339 28,624 148,844 500,073 309,525 229,27: $ 46,299,842 $5,875,889 $6,582,520 $4,497,990 $13,040,370 $16,303,07: NOTE: Expenditures listed in year incurred. 409 FIVE YEAR CAPITAL PROJECTS PROGRAMS 2009 - 2013 Requirements Total 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Capital Reserve $ 16,650,000 $ 3,050,000 $ 6,950,000 $ 2,250,000 $ 1,400,000 $ 3,000,00( Jail Expansion 0 0 0 0 0 SW Administration 4,000,000 0 0 0 4,000,000 Storage Garage 0 0 0 0 0 Courts 1,500,000 0 0 0 1,500,000 Social Services 0 0 0 0 0 Admin Bldg 5,000,000 0 0 5,000,000 0 Misc Projects 500,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,00( SS Parking 0 0 0 0 0 Grader Shed 0 0 0 0 0 PW Projects 500,000 250,000 250,000 0 0 Regnl Crime Lab 8,000,000 8,000,000 0 0 0 DA Building 4,000,000 0 0 0 0 4,000,00( Southeast Admin 0 0 0 0 0 Community Corr. 5,000,000 5,000,000 $ 45,150,000 $16,400,000 $ 7,300,000 $ 7,350,000 $ 7,000,000 $ 7,100,00( 410 RESOURCE CAPACITY FUNDING SOURCES ***************** CASH FLOW ANALYSIS 411 CAPITAL EXPENDITURES FUND RESOURCE CAPACITY 2009 - 2013 PROPERTY GRANTS FEES TOTAL TAX INTEREST 2009 $ 8,000,000 $ 8,000,000 $ 100,000 $ 300,000 $16,400,000 2010 6,000,000 800,000 200,000 300,000 7,300,000 2011 6,000,000 750,000 300,000 300,000 7,350,000 2012 6,000,000 0 600,000 400,000 7,000,000 2013 6,000,000 0 700,000 400,000 7,100,000 412 CASH FLOW ANALYSIS BEGINNING ENDING FUND REVENUE RESOURCES FUND BALANCE EXPENDITURES BALANCE 2009 $ 0 $ 16,400,000 $ 16,400,000 $ 13,350,000 $ 3,050,000 2010 3,050,000 7,300,000 10,350,000 350,000 $ 10,000,000 2011 10,000,000 7,350,000 17,350,000 5,100,000 $ 12,250,000 2012 12,250,000 7,000,000 19,250,000 5,600,000 $ 13,650,000 2013 13,650,000 7,100,000 20,750,000 4,100,000 $ 16,650,000 413 CORRECTIONAL FACILITY Existing Situation: The Centennial Complex Jail was constructed in 1978, and was remodeled three times to increase the capacity to 294 beds. In 1997, Phase I of the North Jail Complex was constructed with 160 beds, and all the core service facilities. The North Jail Complex is currently designed for a build out of 640 beds, but the site can accommodate a 960-bed facility. Each phase would be in increments of approximately 160 - 226 beds. Jail population continues to grow in Weld County. Phase II has been completed and opened in January, 2004. Phase II added 226 beds based upon the design. Construction of Phase II allowed for the closure of the Centennial Jail and conversion of the space to accommodate Court needs. Phase III which added 374 beds, was constructed in 2006 - 2007, and was opened in February 2008. Proposed Solution: It is proposed that additional phases of the North Jail Complex be constructed in increments of 160 -226 beds as needed. The total project of approximately 211,355 square feet will be constructed in phases. The first phase constructed in 1997 was 125,775 square feet. It included the core service facilities,such as kitchen,administrative offices,medical detention, booking area,and lobby to accommodate 640 inmates. Phase II has 226 beds and is both maximum and medium security to accommodate the projected inmate classifications. Phase II was constructed in the 2002-2003 time frame and became fully operational as of 2004. Phase III has 374 beds and was constructed in 2006 - 2007. Financing: It is recommended that the county budget$16,650,000 in the 2009 - 2013 capital plan budget for 350 additional beds. Nothing will be in the Capital budget in 2009 for jail construction. Impact on Operational Costs: In 2014 it is anticipated that the new jail capacity will be opened. The use of the capacity will be phased in over a two to three year period, depending on inmate population growth. Based upon past phased openings of the jail, the estimated additional annual costs are: Item 2013 2014 2015 Staffing $ 1,210,000 $ 770,000 $ 1,100,000 Medical Costs 0 600,000 320,000 Food 0 400,000 200,000 Utilities 0 60,000 0 Maintenance 0 60,000 0 414 WELD COUNTY BUSINESS PARK Existing Situation: In 1987 Weld County acquired 160 acres located in the southwest corner of"O" Street and North 11th Avenue in Greeley. Funds for the property came from the sale of the Health Building. Proposed Solution: The property is large enough to allow for future consolidation of county facilities in one area. The utilities and site improvement were developed in 1988 at an estimated cost of$1,750,000 with the aid of a$630,000 EDA Grant. The first facilities, completed in 1989, included a 15,000 square foot building for Human Services and a county motor vehicle shop. Fifty to 60 acres have been developed for building and storage sites and approximately 60 acres can be mined for gravel and reclaimed in an attractive way. The new correctional facility is located on this site, as well as Human Services, Health Department, Household Hazardous Waste Building, Training Center, Motor Pool, Public Works, Law Administration, Buildings and Grounds, Alternative Programs Facility, and two administrative buildings. A portion of the property was made available for commercial development and offered at no cost or low cost to private parties for economic development incentives. A PUD was approved for land use purposes in 1989. Financing: Development, using future years' funds, is programmed into the long-range plan under specific projects, which include a correction facility ($16,650,000), Community Corrections Facility ($5,000,000), and Administrative Facility($5,000,000). Impact on Operational Costs: See individual projects for cost impacts. 415 GRADER SHEDS / STORAGE BUILDING Existing Situation: The county currently has 18 grader sheds throughout Weld County, to accommodate road maintenance functions in all sectors of the county. The grader sheds are in various conditions, ranging from good to needing replacement. Seventeen have recently been replaced -- Nunn (1981), Gwonda (1982), Vim (1983), New Raymer(1984), Mead (1985), Rockport(1986), Kiowa (1987), Severance (1987), Gilcrest (1989), Ault (1989), Briggsdale (1991), Keenesburg (1994) Stoneham (1994), Dacono (1995), Fort Lupton (2000), Gill (2001), Galeton (2003), and New Raymer (2004), and Rockport (2007). In addition, four ice control storage buildings were constructed in 2001- 2003. An additional storage facility at the Public Works Headquarters was built in 2003. A new Buildings and Grounds facility was built in 2007, and the old facility was converted to a storage garage for emergency vehicles. Proposed Solution: An analysis of existing grader sheds determined which are required for the operational functions of the road maintenance operation in Weld County. In the process some have been sold, others consolidated, and some identified for replacement. In cases where existing grader sheds will accommodate the maintenance function, it is suggested that attention be given to those sheds that need maintenance or major improvements. Where necessary, replacement sheds have been identified. Additional storage buildings are needed, as well as office space. Financing: The county, since 1982, has totally reconstructed and upgraded all grader and road maintenance facilities. The county should continue a sound maintenance and replacement program, so the buildings do not fall into the disrepair condition they were in prior to 1982. The funding mechanism should be a pay-as-you-go function out of the Capital Fund. Funds in the amount of$250,000 per year in 2009 - 2011 are included for other Public Works facilities. Impact on Operational Costs: Since the old grader sheds are being replaced with new sheds, the county's experience is that there is approximately a $1,000 per year savings on the utilities due to the use of radiant heat and improved insulation. Staffing is unchanged. 416 JUSTICE CENTER Existing Situation: The Justice Center includes the Courthouse, Court Annexes, and Centennial Center buildings. It provides for the space needs of the 19th Judicial District. Under state law the county is obligated to provide and maintain the facilities for court related activities. The Courthouse was built in 1917 and is maintained on the Federal Register of Historical Buildings. After many remodels and upgrades it still functions as the main court facility for Weld County. In the mid-1980's two buildings across the street from the Courthouse were acquired and remodeled to house the Probation Department. In 2001, the West Courthouse Annex Building was acquired to house the District Attorney Juvenile Division. As the population grows and court related activities grow the space requirements continue to expand. Four courtrooms were added in 2008. Proposed Solution: With the growing needs of the courts it will require that the county convert the Centennial Center, including the jail, to courtrooms and court-related offices. With the construction of Phase II of the North Jail, the Centennial Jail was closed and remodeled into court-related space in 2004. All Sheriffs office administrative functions, along with Communications and Records, were moved to the new Public Safety Administrative Building next to the North Jail in 2003. Over time the entire Centennial Complex will become court-related space, as well as the two annex buildings to the west and east of the Courthouse. In 2004, three additional district courtrooms were created, a juvenile courtroom, and one additional county courtroom, and in 2007 four additional court rooms were built. These courtrooms will supplement the current vacant district courtroom and the visiting judge courtroom to accommodate four anticipated additional judges through 2011. The first floor of the Centennial Jail has been converted into courtrooms. The second and third floors of the jail are being remodeled for additional court and office facilities. First floor Centennial offices were converted into office space for the Clerk to the Court. The space in the Courthouse occupied by the Clerk to the Court was converted into a district courtroom. Space occupied by the Weld County Commissioners and administrative functions will be converted to court-related space after these functions move to a new administrative building sometime after 2011. Financing: The county can accommodate court related activities in the space of the Justice Center for several years. In addition, the block to the southeast of the Centennial Complex has been acquired by the county and converted into a parking lot. In the future when the need arises, that block can serve as a site for court building expansion and a parking garage structure to accommodate court space needs. Also, in the next decade it may be necessary to have court facilities in the southern part of Weld County where the population is growing at a rapid rate. The funding mechanism for all court facility needs should be a pay-as-you-go function out of the Capital Fund. The following page is a schedule of proposed conversion of Justice Center space. 417 CAPITAL PLAN FOR JUSTICE CENTER YEAR CURRENT USE NEW USE COST 2008 Vacant Work Release (30,000 sf) $ 4,275,000 2008 Second Floor Old Jail 2 Courtrooms $ 1,500,000 2008 Third Floor Work Release 2 Courtrooms $ 1,500,000 2008 Third Floor Work Release DA Offices $ 1,000,000 2011 Vacant Administrative Bldg. $ 5,000,000 2012 Planning Probation $ 100,000 2012 Third Floor Centennial 2 Courtrooms $ 1,200,000 2012 First Floor Centennial 1 Courtroom $ 200,000 2013 Vacant DA Building $ 5,000,000 2014+ Third Floor Centennial (DA) 2 Courtrooms $ 750,000 2014+ Second Floor Centennial 2 Courtrooms $ 750,000 2014+ First Floor Centennial (DA) Court Offices $ 200,000 Impact on Operational Costs: Under Colorado law, county governments are required to provide space for the courts and maintenance of the facility, but all personnel and other operating expenses are paid for by the State of Colorado. The estimated additional building maintenance costs by year are: 2009 $ 104,200 2010 0 2011 160,000 2012 0 2013 176,000 2014 0 418 ALTERNATIVE PROGRAMS BUILDING Existing Situation: Alternative programs are currently housed in the old jail and in the West Courthouse Annex. As jail crowding becomes more and more of a problem, the alternative programs, such as work release and pre-trial programs, are used more and more by the Court. The programs currently occupy approximately 20,000 square feet. The space that the programs occupy is needed for courtrooms and Probation office space. Proposed Solution: To accommodate the space needs of the alternative programs and allow for growth in the programs, a 30,000 square foot building is proposed. The facility will be constructed in the Weld County Business Park. This puts the facility in closer proximity to the jail for support services. Financing: The new 30,000 square foot Alternative Programs Building was completed in 2008. Impact on Operational Costs: Impact of additional costs on the 2008 budget was$156,300 for utilities and maintenance. Staffing costs were unchanged, since personnel were transferred from the old facility to the new building. 419 LAW ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION BUILDING Existing Situation: Growing needs of the courts require that the county convert the Centennial Center, including the jail, to courtrooms and court-related offices. With the construction of Phase II of the North Jail, the Centennial Jail will be closed and remodeled into court-related space. In addition,all Sheriff's office administrative functions, along with the Communications and Records, was relocated in 2004 to accommodate the courts. Proposed Solution: Since the entire jail operation was moved to the North Jail there are logistical advantages to relocate all Sheriff office functions near the jail site. To accommodate the space needs of the Sheriffs Office, a 22,000 square foot office building near the North Jail site was constructed in 2002. The building houses the Sheriff's office functions, Communications, and Records. This allows for the consolidation of all criminal justice functions at one site with the exception of patrol substations. Financing: The new Public Safety Administration Building was constructed in 2002. Funds in the amount of $2,500,000 were budgeted in 2002 for the construction of a 22,000 square foot office building. In 2009, the Records Unit will be moved from the Law Enforcement Administration Building to the former Human Services Building to free up space for the Sheriff's Office. Impact on Operational Costs: There will be no impact of additional costs on the 2009 budget for utilities and maintenance since the space has been maintained in the past. Staffing costs are unchanged, since personnel were transferred from the old facility to the new building. 420 REGIONAL CRIME LAB Existing Situation: Currently the county has a crime lab located in the basement of the Centennial Complex. The space is inadequate to meet the size and program requirements. Weld County is taking the lead to create a regional crime lab for Northern Colorado that would house approximately 40 crime lab staff members from various law enforcement agencies and CBI. The crime lab will be located on the University of Northern Colorado Campus in order to offer classes and internships for UNC students wanting crime lab experience and education through the criminal justice program. Proposed Solution: The proposed regional crime lab facility will consist of two floors(20,000 square feet per floor), for a total of 40,000 square feet. It will be located on the University of Northern Colorado Campus and will contain private and open office areas,waiting areas, lobby space, meeting/conference rooms, elevator(s),complete laboratory and forensics discovery area. It will be fully fire sprinkled. Building construction will be similar to those county facilities recently constructed at the Weld County Business Park. The construction will also incorporate some of the elements of the design criteria for the University of Northern Colorado. Financing: The new regional crime lab will be constructed in 2009 on the UNC campus. Land has been donated by UNC. An Energy Impact Grant in the amount of$6,000,000, along with $2,000,000 in county funds, will fund the construction portion of the project. Impact on Operational Costs: There will be additional costs in the 2010 budget for utilities and maintenance, in the amount of $104,200. However, participating agencies will pay approximately 80%of this cost, or$83,000 for a net county cost of $21,200. Staffing costs are unchanged, since personnel will be transferred from the old crime lab to the new building. 421 COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS FACILITY Existing Situation: The Community Corrections program has been operated by private contractors since its inception in Weld County in the early 1980's. The facility that the contractors have used is the site known as The Villa, which is old dormitories on the UNC campus. UNC has encouraged the Community Corrections Facility to move off campus due to the facility housing convicted felons that are returning to the community from the Colorado Department of Corrections. Recently, there have been problems with the contractor that owns the facility providing the community correction services. The county realizes that without a county-owned community corrections facility it limits the county's choices for a contract provider of the service and the option of the county operating the facility itself through the Sheriff's Office. Proposed Solution: The Board of Weld County Commissioners, in May 2008, made the decision that the county should construct its own Community Corrections Facility in the Weld County Business Park. The site will be at the entrance of the park at the northwest corner of 11th Avenue and H Street. A 30,000 square-foot building will be constructed in 2009 to accommodate the program. Financing: The new Community Corrections Facility will be constructed in 2009 in the Weld County Business Park. An Energy Impact Grant in the amount of$2,000,000,along with$3,000,000 in county funds will fund the project. Impact on Operational Costs: There will be additional costs in the 2009 budget for utilities and maintenance, in the amount of $160,000. However, the majority of the program costs are paid for from state contracts with the State Department of Corrections. The total program costs are $2,113,810 and revenues are $2,021,263 in the 2009 budget. Currently, the program services are provided by a private contractor. A study is being conducted to determine whether the contract should be continued or the program should be brought in-house with county staff. 422 DOWNTOWN GREELEY PARKING AND LAND Existing Situation: The Courthouse and Centennial Center are located in the center of downtown Greeley. The future plans are for these facilities to be the judicial center for the 19th Judicial District that serves Weld County. Parking has been a long time problem in the area for citizens using the facilities. In addition, as Weld County looks to the future there will be a need to have land to locate future court facilities. The court administration is insistent upon having a centralized location, since other jurisdictions have had logistical problems attempting to split court facilities into more than one location. As a result, there is a need to acquire land adjacent to the current location to accommodate future court facilities. Proposed Solution: In July, 2003, the county purchased a portion of an adjacent block of property to the Centennial Complex and Courthouse to allow for surface parking in the immediate future, and to provide future building sites for future court facilities. Opportunity existed to purchase approximately 100,000 square feet adjacent to the current facilities in 2003. The parking was developed in 2004, and needed facilities can be constructed on this site in the future. Financing: In 2003, fund balance from the General Fund in the amount of$1,500,000 was transferred to the Capital Expenditure Fund to acquire the site and put money aside for the parking improvements in 2004. Approximately 250 parking spots have been developed to serve the area. As portions of the site are needed for court building sites, a parking structure can be built to accommodate added parking needs or land to the east or south of the site can be acquired for surface parking. Impact on Operational Costs: No new operation costs are anticipated. 423 ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE BUILDING Existing Situation: The long term plan with the development of the Weld County Business Park was for the eventual move of all administrative functions of the county to the business park. All of the functions were housed at the Centennial Complex in 1976. In 1990-91 the Assessor, Treasurer, Clerk and Recorder, and Planning were relocated to the business park. With the future space demands of the courts it is anticipated that the remaining county administrative functions at the Centennial Complex will need to be relocated to the Weld County Business Park within the next 10 years. This will leave the Centennial Complex as a justice and law enforcement center exclusively. Proposed Solution: In order to accommodate the court's space needs and the county's administrative functions it will be necessary to construct a new administrative facility at the Weld County Business Park in the next 10 years. To accommodate the space needs of the existing administrative functions and plan for future growth it is anticipated that a building comparable to the new Health Building will be required. Financing: It is recommended that in the Capital Improvement Plan that the county begin to accumulate funds in a reserve for the future construction of a new administrative building. Estimated costs for the facility will be $5,000,000. In the ten-year Capital Improvement Plan $5,000,000 is reserved for 2011. Impact on Operational Costs: There will be additional costs in the 2012 budget for utilities and maintenance, in the amount of $180,000. There will be no additional staffing costs since the staff will be moving from other facilities to occupy this building. Moving and relocation costs are estimated to be $50,000. 424 SOCIAL SERVICES BUILDING ANNEX Existing Situation: The Social Services Building was acquired in the 1970's and in the mid 1990's an annex was added. In 2005,additional land was purchased,adjacent to and south of the two existing buildings. The additional land will accommodate another 20,000 square foot building and parking. Proposed Solution: It was proposed that a new 40,000 square foot building be constructed in Greeley on the Social Services site in 2008. The building will accommodate the current services, plus allow room for future expansion and consolidation of the Human Services and Social Services Departments. Financing: The building was constructed in 2008. Funds in the amount of$6,000,000 were budgeted in the 2008 budget for the 40,000 square foot building. Additional parking was constructed in 2007, in the amount of$500,000. Impact on Operational Costs: There will be additional costs in the 2009 budget for utilities and maintenance, in the amount of $210,000. However, the majority of the program costs are paid for from grants from the State Department of Social Services. There will be no additional staffing costs since the staff will be moving from other facilities to occupy this building. Moving and relocation costs are estimated to be $45,000. 425 SOUTHWEST COUNTY SERVICE CENTER Existing Situation: The Southwest County Service Center was developed in 2000-2001. With the growth in the area, additional facilities will be required to house all the County functions required to service the area. Proposed Solution: It is proposed that an additional 20,000 square foot building be constructed on the Southwest Weld County Service Center site in 2013. The building will accommodate the current services, plus allow room for future expansion of services in the area. Financing: The building will be constructed in 2013. Funds in the amount of$4,000,000 are budgeted in the 2013 budget for the 20,000 square foot building. Impact on Operational Costs: There will be additional costs in the 2014 budget for utilities and maintenance, in the amount of $120,000. There will be no additional staffing costs since the staff will be moving from other facilities to occupy this building. Moving and relocation costs are estimated to be $30,000. 426 SOUTHEAST COUNTY SERVICE CENTER Existing Situation: The Southeast County Service Center was acquired as a used building in the early 1980's from the City of Fort Lupton. With the growth in the area, the building was no longer large enough for the functions located in the building, and the building was in need of remodeling. Proposed Solution: In 2006, a new 20,000 square foot building was constructed in east Fort Lupton on a five-acre site. The building accommodates the historic services provided, plus Probation and increased Social Services. The location of the building in east Fort Lupton will better accommodate not only Fort Lupton residents, but also residents from the Hudson and Lochbuie areas. Financing: The building was constructed in 2006. Impact on Operational Costs: No new operational costs are anticipated. 427 MISCELLANEOUS PROJECTS Existing Situation: Each year there are several small projects to update or renovate county facilities, provide for new county programs, and remodel to accommodate changing programs or meet new legal standards. An approach which provides miscellaneous funds of this nature can prevent postponing necessary remodeling of facilities and, thus, avoid added cost or delay of potential savings to the county and taxpayers. In addition, such an approach can also make better utilization of existing facilities in order to avoid the acquisition of new space and facilities. Carpet replacement should be included in this category. Proposed Solution: It is recommended that an amount of$100,000 per year be set aside for such projects in the Long Range Capital Projects Plan. Financing: It is recommended the county budget $100,000 in each future year. Impact on Operational Costs: No new operational costs are anticipated. 428 ACCUMULATIVE CAPITAL OUTLAY/CONTINGENCY Existing Situation: If Weld County is to embark upon a number of ventures in capital projects over the next five years, it is suggested the county proceed very cautiously and very conservatively in the area of financing. To do this, it is suggested that a contingency be set aside each year on a pay as you go basis to accommodate unanticipated cost increases or emergency situations which cannot be foreseen at this time. If the contingency amount is accumulated over the next five years, it can be used as a reserve for the capital projects program in future years, or it can be used as a funding mechanism in years beyond 2013. The primary reserve would be for a future correctional facility or other facilities at the North County Complex and southwest and southeast County administrative office sites. Proposed Solution: Budget any carry-over amount each year on a contingency basis that ultimately could be used to meet any contingency or emergency situation, or could be used as an accumulation of capital outlay funds for funding of projects beyond 2013. Financing: It is recommended that the county budget fund balance carry-overs in the capital fund each year as a contingency. Impact on Operational Costs: None. 429 MISCELLANEOUS FUNDS 430 AIRPORT Existing Situation: The Weld County Board of County Commissioners, with approval of the Airport Master Plan, committed to participate in certain enhancements at the Airport facility, especially those enhancements that will ensure the safety of airport operations. If the Board decides to continue to participate in the joint funding of the Greeley/Weld County Airport Authority with the City of Greeley, funds should be provided for in the Long Range Capital Projects Plan to accommodate the FAA ADAP program during the next five years. Funds can also be made available to maintain FAA constructed facilities. Proposed Solution: In the Long Range Capital Projects Plan for 2009, funds are included to accommodate capital improvements at the Greeley/Weld County Airport. If funding is provided, it should be for projects that emphasize safety features and other essential enhancements to the current operation. Financing: Funding, in the amount of $15,000 is required in the Airport's 2009 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). Impact on Operational Costs: Although the Airport Authority may incur additional operational costs from the projects in the Airport CIP, no new operational costs are anticipated as a result of the Airport CIP for Weld County government. 431 (Airport Capital Improvement Plan) 432 CONSERVATION TRUST FUND Existing Situation: With the passage of SB119 (The Colorado Lottery), 40 percent of the proceeds of the lottery are earmarked for Conservation Trust Funds in local governments. The earning potential of the lottery is anticipated to be$385,000 per year. The funds must be used for"the acquisition, development and maintenance of new conservation sites or for capital improvements or maintenance for recreational purposes on any public site". (Section 29-21-101, C. R. S.) With the passage of Amendment 8 (GO COLORADO) these funds should stabilize at $396,000 per year, plus lottery sales growth. See Conservation Trust Fund for detailed discussion. Proposed Solution: The Board has the option to use the funds in the following ways: 1. Maintain and improve Island Grove Park. 2. Maintain and improve the Missile Site park. 3. Acquire and maintain open space. 4. Develop and maintain trails. 5. Other project requests from throughout the county. Financing: In addition to Conservation Trust Funds, it is recommended that the county finance parks and recreation projects at a level of$32,000 in the General Fund from property taxes. Funds from 2009 forward are uncommitted. Impact on Operational Costs: No new operational costs are anticipated. 433 ISLAND GROVE Existing Situation: Weld County and the City of Greeley currently have certain joint ventures and commitments to develop the Island Grove Park facility. Some discussion has been held regarding the creation of an Island Grove Park Authority for development and management of the facility. Proposed Solution: If the Board of County Commissioners decides to continue participation in the development of the Island Grove facility, it is recommended that Conservation Trust Funds from the lottery be used to the maximum amount prior to use of county general tax funds. Financing: It is recommended that the county finance any Island Grove enhancements with Conservation Trust Funds resulting from the lottery to the maximum amount possible prior to use of general county tax funds. Beginning in 2003, $100,000 per year in General Fund dollars has been committed to the maintenance of an indoor arena facility. Also, in 2000 the County contributed$1,500,000 towards the construction of the indoor arena facility, known as the Island Grove Community Building. The facility was constructed and will be maintained jointly by the City of Greeley, Farm Show, and Weld County. $250,000 was included in the 2004 General Fund budget to add air conditioning to the Island Grove Community Building. The county paid $1,500,000 in 2006 for the Island Grove Park Master Plan that covers improvements to the park for the next 10 - 20 year period. Impact on Operational Costs: Although the Island Grove Park Authority may incur additional operational costs from the projects in the park's CIP, no new operational costs are anticipated as a result of the park's CIP for Weld County government. In most cases, the new park facilities planned will generate revenues to support the additional operating costs. 434 PROPRIETARY FUNDS SUMMARY Proprietary funds include both Internal Service Funds and Enterprise Funds. Internal Service Funds are established to account for goods and services provided to other departments of the county on a cost-reimbursement basis. Enterprise Funds account for departments providing services primarily to third party payers. PARAMEDIC SERVICE ENTERPRISE FUND: The Paramedic Service is funded totally from 2009 projected fees of$8,598,199 with no county subsidy. Total expenditures include $4,310,174 for salaries, $266,564 for bad debt allowance, $162,129 for depreciation, and the remainder for services and supplies. The budget for new equipment is $250,000. MOTOR VEHICLE FUND: The Motor Vehicle Fund accounts for the revenue and costs generated by equipment and vehicles rented to other county departments. The gross operating budget amounts to$8,516,500 in 2009,with$2,336,700 budgeted for new capital equipment. The budget reflects the continuation of the contract fleet management approach adopted by the Board in August 1984. Depreciation is$2,500,000 for new equipment purchases, plus sale of surplus items of$516,500. HEALTH INSURANCE FUND: The Health Insurance Fund reflects the cost of Weld County's self-insurance program which includes health,dental,and vision coverage. Details of the program and coverage are found under the specifics of the fund summary. In 2009,the county will continue with only dental and vision being self-insured. Health coverage will be provided by a private company on a partially self-insured basis. INSURANCE FUND: The Insurance Fund accounts for all insurance costs for the county. The program is a combination of insured risks and protected self-insurance risks. Gross budget costs are$1,830,000 in 2009,with a property tax levy of$1,500,000. Details of the program are provided under the specifics of the fund summary. PHONE SERVICE FUND: Budget reflects total consolidation of phone service costs of$1,380,705 in Weld County. Funding is at current level and reflects capital upgrades of$250,000. WELD COUNTY FINANCE CORPORATION: Budget contains the funding for the Weld County Finance Corporation, which accounts for the lease purchases of county buildings. As of August 1, 2007, there are no longer any active leases. Weld County has no long-term debt. 435 PARAMEDIC SERVICES FUND SUMMARY OF REVENUES 200 2008 2009 2009 2009 Fund Org Acct Account Title Budget Request Recommend Final INTERGOVERNMENTAL 5000 23100 4340 GRANTS 77,120 38,400 38,400 38,40( CHARGE FOR SERVICES 5000 23100 4410 CHARGE FOR SERVICES 14,466,014 15,436,771 15,436,771 15,436,771 5000 23100 44101 MEDICARE/MEDICAID ADJUSTMENT -6,883,800 -6,876,972 -6,876,972 -6,876,97; TOTAL CHARGE FOR SERVICES 7,582,214 8,559,799 8,559,799 8,559,794 MISCELLANEOUS 5000 23100 4730 OTHER FEES 8,606 0 0 5000 23100 4820 COMPENSATION FOR LOSSES 9,788 0 0 TOTAL MISCELLANEOUS 18,394 0 0 TOTAL PARAMEDIC SERVICES FUND 7,677,728 8,598,199 8,598,199 8,598,194 436 PARAMEDIC SERVICES FUND SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES 2009 2006 2009 2009 2009 Fund Orq Expenditure Function Budget Request Recommend Final 5000 23100 AMBULANCE 7,677,728 8,837,154 8,598,199 8,598,199 TOTAL PARAMEDIC SERVICES FUND 7.677.728 8.837,154 8.598.199 8,598.199 437 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: PARAMEDIC SERVICE ENTERPRISE FUND BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Paramedic Service -- 5000-23100 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: The Weld County Paramedic Service responds to both routine and emergency calls for the county. It is an advanced life support(paramedic)provider. Personnel and vehicles are stationed in Greeley, Evans, and Fort Lupton. ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED FINAL RESOURCES LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 3,877,870 $ 4,142,635 $ 4,549,129 $ 4,310,174 Supplies 404,849 294,380 313,000 313,000 Purchased Services 654,121 531,107 755,555 755,555 Fixed Charges 3,642,601 2,459,606 2,969,470 2,969,470 Capital 344,319 250,000 250,000 250,000 Gross County Cost $ 8,923,760 $ 7,677,728 $ 8,837,154 $ 8,598,199 Revenue 8,652,954 7,677,728 8,837,154 8,598,199 Net County Cost $ 270,806 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Budget Positions 50 51 55 51 SUMMARY OF CHANGES: It is proposed to increase full time personnel by four to 55. This represents two Emergency Medical Technician Paramedics and two Emergency Medical Technicians Basics being added to staffing. The additional personnel will provide 12 hours of coverage per day, seven days per week in the Johnstown and Milliken Fire Districts of Weld County. Milliken and Johnstown Fire Districts are approaching 700 calls per year. Response times are below Performance Measures for Weld County Paramedic Services for fire districts of similar size and population. The increased volume requires the additional coverage to meet Performance Standards for Response Times. The cost of these additional staff members is $238,955. Supplies are up $18,620. Medical supplies are up $20,000 and uniforms are up $10,000 with offsetting reductions in small equipment ($10,000)and other supplies ($1,380). Services are up $224,228. The largest increases are in vehicle costs ($150,321), collection expenses ($58,366), phones ($17,616), data processing ($8,455) and training ($3,273). There were offsetting reductions in repair and maintenance($15,000)and other miscellaneous accounts. Fixed Charges are up $509,864 primary due to bad debt allowances. Capital of $250,000 includes computer equipment ($10,000), radios ($25,000), and $205,000 for the re-chassis of one vehicle and one new ambulance. 438 PARAMEDIC SERVICE (CONTINUED) 5000-23100 SUMMARY OF CHANGES (CONTINUED): Revenues are budgeted at $8,598,199. The department recommends the bundling of rates to collection. Pending the results of the Departmental Performance Analysis a work session and presentation will address this issue. OBJECTIVES: 1)To keep the Ambulance Service on a self-supporting (zero subsidy) basis; 2) To maintain maximum possible collection ratios; and 3) To develop stable revenue sources. PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Work Outputs Total Calls For Service 13,282 13,832 14,523 # Patients Evaluated/Treat/Air Transport 900 1,022 1,073 #Transported Patients 8,866 9.214 9,675 Total Transport Mileage 68,911 78,390 88,000 # Dry Runs: No Patient/ Cancelled 2,792/860 2,824/772 2,965/819 Efficiency Measures FTE's per 10,000/capita 2.20 2.26 2.26 Per capita cost (county support) $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Receipts/Charges Ratio w/contractual 30% 30% 30% Receipts/Charges Ratio w/o contractual 62% 62% 62% Effectiveness Measures (desired results) Cardiac Alert Program: Door to Cardiac 100% @ 100% @ 100% @ Cath Times <90 minutes 49 min 34 min 30 min Fractile Emergency Response Times (<9 minutes 90% of calls) - Weld County 70% 70% 70% Fractile Routine Response Times (<15 minutes 90% of calls) -Weld County 91% 90% 90% 439 PARAMEDIC SERVICE (CONTINUED) 5000-23100 FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: The budget as requested is recommended, except the four additional staff($238,954). The call volume may be up, but the revenue and cash flow will not support the increase at this time. If there is evidence in 2009 that the cash flow is improving due to volume, then the four positions can be reconsidered mid-year 2009. Revenues in the recommended budget have been adjusted accordingly. BOARD ACTION: The Board approved the following: 1. Denied funding for four additional staff members. 2. Approved the new bundling fee structure. 3. On December 8,2008,the Board approved a new vehicle replacement program that will replace all ambulances by 2011 and put all vehicles on a four-year replacement cycle. To accomplish the financing of this change, $1,250,000 was transferred to the Paramedic Services Fund in 2008. 440 MOTOR POOL FUND SUMMARY OF REVENUES 200 2008 2009 2009 2009 Fund Org Acct Account Title Budget Request Recommend Final CHARGE FOR SERVICES 6000 96300 4410 CHARGE FOR SERVICES 4,000,000 5,500,000 5,500,000 5,500,00C MISCELLANEOUS 6000 96300 4680 OTHER 2,300,000 2,500,000 2,500,000 2,500,00( 6000 96300 4810 GAIN LOSS ON SALE 288,500 516,500 516,500 516,50C 6000 96300 4820 COMPENSATION FOR LOSSES 100,000 0 0 TOTAL MISCELLANEOUS 2,688,500 3,016,500 3,016,500 3,016,50( TOTAL MOTOR POOL FUND 6,688,500 8,516.500 8,516,500 8.516,50( 441 MOTOR POOL FUND SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES 2009 2008 2009 2009 2009 Fund Org Expenditure Function Budget Request Recommend Final 6000 17550 VEHICLE REPLACEMENT 2,566,000 2,371,700 2,331,700 2,331,700 6000 96300 COUNTY SHOP 6,518,500 8,516,500 8,516,500 8,516,500 TOTAL MOTOR POOL FUND 9.084.500 10.888.200 10.848.200 10.848.200 442 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: IS - MOTOR POOL BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Motor Pool Equipment-- 6000-17550 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: Use of funded depreciation to acquire vehicles for county use. ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED FINAL RESOURCES LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Capital 2,893,623 2,470,000 2,331,700 2,331,700 Gross County Cost $ 2,893,623 $ 2,470,000 $ 2,331,700 $ 2,331,700 Revenue 0 0 0 0 Net County Cost $ 2,893,623 $ 2,470,000 $ 2,331,700 $ 2,331,700 Budget Positions - - - - - - - - SUMMARY OF CHANGES: See listed equipment on next page. OBJECTIVES: N/A FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. BOARD ACTION: Approved as recommended. 443 IGA EQUIPMENT Request Recommend Approved Sheriff: Patrol Vehicles (9) $ 143,500 $ 143,500 $ 143,500 Cargo Van (1) 43,300 43,300 43,300 SUV 4X4 (4) 112,000 112,000 112,000 SUV 4X2 (2) 50,000 50,000 50,000 Civilian (6) 129,000 129,000 129,000 Animal Control: 3/4 Ton Extend Cab (1) 21,400 21,400 21,400 OEM: Retain 15220071 (1) 0 0 0 Lab: Civilian (1) 21,500 21,500 21,500 Buildings and Grounds: 1/2 Ton Extend Cab (3) 54,000 54,000 54,000 Building Inspection: 4 X 4 Extend Cab (2) 40,000 0 0 Human Services: 15 Passenger Van (2) 74,000 74,000 74,000 Engineering: SUV 4 X 4 (1) 30,000 30,000 30,000 Noxious Weed: 1/2 Ton 4 X 4 Extend Cab (1) 18,000 18,000 18,000 Public Works: See Basic List 1,635,000 1,635,000 1,635,000 Total $2,371,700 $2,331,700 $2,331,700 444 2009 FINAL EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PUBLIC WORKS 09 ,f^{ h4A: ZAC4A * +4. {8910a ", tom! taIc Trucking 1 Tandem Axle End Dump Trailer $38 000 �' -4 oi i' k. g ,.a a .`�a `x.,._' +� ., Graders 3 140H Motor Graders $600,000 1 1/2 Ton Pickup Reg Cab,4X4 Standard Long $22,000 `+ , : t- ............................... ... ... . ^lit! 4z . ,,t„,4 L 9 Bridge 1 Tandem Axle Dump Trk, Reg Cab,Dual Whls w/snow plow $130 000y s . c�a.,`st k "t#.sat ..3E �'?;,.iv:.F_n.x-`�..O ........................x—i,-'_..n, .,+alL-Lfaa :, 1 Tandem Tractor 5th Wheel Reg Cab Dual Axles w/wet kit $130 000 i rtE .l.n.n ' t,,.. 1 Mini Skid Loader, Diesel Engine $30,000 „� 'wC 1 Vibratory Compactor,Smooth Drum,w/Encl Cab+g� $140 000 IB'Ti!' a=a. •- ray ch s>87.. ..imiitit.v . kaW,. • 1 Tandem Flatbed Reg Cab Dual Axles w/hoist i,w$130 000 1 1/2-Ton Pickup, Ext Cab,4X4 w/snow plow $23 000 1 Snow,NPlow�L66(to abe mounted qon 15220116) $4,000 e!cftlf9sl9a ,�"�::< ' t ; `�v;ua. _:, 1 Welder, Diesel Eng $11,000 1 Attachment for Existing Excavator for Concrete Demolition $28,000 1 Attachment for Existing Excavator for Compacting $30,000 Cab,4X4, Dual Wheels,Single Axle $70 000 Maint-Supt 2 1-Ton Trucks, Ext � �� 1 1 1/2-Ton Pickup, Ext Cab,4X4,Standard Short Box $22 000 ....._.._ i���>iti i : �. f °iCMJ'�P �� � k"ri 'n i�H:: : _ ... .,.. _.. . ._.N.7o-tIAB(hl �_,•._<_ ... .,...:_isp ..,....:.. ..dtui-..:� �._ ��",.ir Mining No new equipment needed Pvmt Mgmt 1 Double Drum Steel Wheel Roller Roller w $130,000 �y ' �•±'• ! k f`'f�V i. _''�__'. Ste._;ar�'iivi Y°s ..._ 'i-e:.. :_ x PW,-: :rn 1 1/2-Ton Pickup, Crew Cab,4X4,Standard Long $32,000 �ay M rTEm PIO.; S1,6i M, i ...i x dt......h 4 iRw*7y x: 1 1-Ton Dump Truck, Extend Cab,4X4, Dual Whls/Single Axle $65,000 Admin No new equipment needed GRAND TOTAL PRICE LESS REVENUE $1,113,800 2009 FINAL EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT-PUBLIC WORKS-GENERAL FUND TOTALS 445 Weed/Pest 1 1/2 Ton Pickup, Ext Cab,4X4,Standard Short Body,4 Cy $16,000 it'd ,..r. '' `c!?ki5ii,e4µ ,ate t : ".y itat .,<rL�.? m Fra-.{tia ... _ ,243=i Engineering 1 SUV,4X4 $30 000 Ending Balance(Cost less Trade-1000 Fund) $40,500 446 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: IS - MOTOR POOL BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Motor Pool Administration - - 6000-96300 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: Centralized motor pool support for Weld County. Contract for fleet maintenance is included in this budget unit. ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED FINAL RESOURCES LAST FY CURRENT NEXT FY NEXT FY FY Personnel Services $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Supplies 2,351,718 2,032,000 3,032,000 3,032,000 Purchased Services 2,429,202 2,042,500 2,853,500 2,853,500 Fixed Charges 2,718,734 2,420,000 2,616,000 2,616,000 Capital 5,763 24,000 15,000 15,000 Gross County Cost $ 7,505,417 $ 6,518,500 $ 8,516,500 $ 8,516,500 Revenue 9,388,268 6,688,500 8,516,500 8,516,500 Net County Cost $ -1,882,851 $ -170,000 $ 0 $ 0 Budget Positions - - - - - - - - SUMMARY OF CHANGES: Supplies are up $1,000,000 due to cost of goods sold, which is due to the fuel cost increases. Contract services are up $800,000 due to growth and inflation, and accounting for all shop work going through this budget. Depreciation is up $200,000. Revenues are up $1,828,000. OBJECTIVES: Provide most efficient and economical means of vehicle maintenance for the county departments through privatization. 447 IS -MOTOR POOL ADMINISTRATION (CONTINUED) 6000-96300 PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Work Outputs Number of work orders issued 7,000 7,100 7,200 Number of service/maintenance orders per technician 875 895 900 Efficiency Measures FTE's per 10,000/capita .49 .48 .45 Work orders issued per FTE 615 623 600 Effectiveness Measures (desired results) #of mechanics to vehicle/equipment ratio 1:105 1:105 1:105 FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. Budget has been significantly impacted by fuel costs, which in turn translate primarily into an increase in the Public Works budget. BOARD ACTION: Approved as recommended. Even though fuel prices have dropped in the last two months, the budget was left unchanged due to the volatility of the oil market at this time. 448 HEALTH INSURANCE FUND SUMMARY OF REVENUES 200 2008 2009 2009 2009 Fund Org Acct Account Title Budget Request Recommend Final MISCELLANEOUS 6200 93400 46902 EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTIONS 8,686,111 10,530,000 10,530,000 10,530,00C TOTAL HEALTH INSURANCE FUND 8,686,111 10,530,000 10,530,000 10,530,00C 449 HEALTH INSURANCE FUND SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES 2009 2008 2009 2009 2009 Fund Org Expenditure Function Budget Request Recommend Final 6200 93400 DENTALNISION 8,686,111 10,530,000 10,530,000 10,530,000 TOTAL HEALTH INSURANCE FUND 8.686.111 10.530.000 10.530.000 10.530.000 450 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: IS - HEALTH INSURANCE BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Health Insurance Fund -- 6200-93100/93400 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: Provides for the costs associated with Weld County's self- insured health program. ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED FINAL RESOURCES LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Purchased Services 18,456 181,000 181,000 181,000 Fixed Charges 8,124,088 8,505,111 10,349,000 10,349,000 Gross County Cost $ 8,142,544 $ 8,686,111 $ 10,530,000 $ 10,530,000 Revenue 8,821,434 8,686,111 10,530,000 10,530,000 Net County Cost $ -678,890 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 SUMMARY OF CHANGES: The budget reflects the cost of self-insuring the dental and vision reimbursement plan($210,000),and wellness program($181,000). In addition the budget, in 2005, started to include the self-insured health program offered county employees through Great West Healthcare. OBJECTIVES: 1)Provide employee health/dental/vision insurance in the most cost effective way possible; and 2) Provide a well program to all employees. PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Work Outputs Single coverage 521 645 580 Family coverage 285 340 454 FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. Budget anticipates an 11% county contribution increase, which is the same as the cost increase of medical care. Weld County will utilize Great-West Healthcare, with a hybrid universal health PPO/HMO plan as the health insurance provider in 2009. Dependent coverage contribution has been set at 80% of the employee rate. 451 IS - HEALTH INSURANCE 6200-93100 (CONTINUED) FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION (Continued): In 2005, the county moved its health insurance plan to a consumer driven plan that combines a high deductible PPO insurance policy along with an HMO component for preventative care, with a $20 co-pay and low cost prescriptive drug program. The high deductible policy protects the insured from catastrophic losses, such as prolonged illness, hospitalization or simply an unexpected period of poor health. The plan is a partially self-insured program with stop loss insurance. The goal is to make the employees aware of the true cost of health care,with a program that will encourage employees and their families to make more judicious spending decisions in return for paying lower insurance premiums and lower health care costs. The health plan is being offered through Great-West Healthcare. In 2008, the county moved to a universal health care option that has lower employee premiums and higher co-insurance and out-of-pocket costs. A comprehensive wellness program was also implemented in 2008. 2009 is the second year of the two year rate guarantee approved in 2008. The county will benchmark the county's contribution to a mid-range PPO plan. In future years, the county contribution will increase with the cost-of-living increase for health care, and not be based upon a combination of cost-of-living of healthcare and utilization, since utilization will be controlled by each individual and their family. The 2009 program is calculated with current participation as follows: Single Coverage: 1,034 Dependent Coverage: 454 FIXED COSTS: Health Insurance $ 1,258,000 Administration/Wellness/EAPCosts = 181,000 Fixed Costs: $ 1,439,665 LOSS FUND: Medical $ 8,881,000 Dental = 150,000 Vision = 60,000 Loss Fund Costs $ 9,091,000 GRAND TOTAL - COSTS $10,530,000 REVENUE: Medical $10,320,000 DentalNision 210,000 TOTAL REVENUE $10,530,000 BOARD ACTION: Approved as recommended. The 2009 rate increase of 11% was approved as recommended. No change in the benefit level. 452 INSURANCE FUND SUMMARY OF REVENUES 200 2008 2009 2009 2009 Fund Org Acct Account Title Budget Request Recommend Final TAXES 6300 93300 4112 CURRENT PROPERTY TAXES 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,500,00( CHARGE FOR SERVICES 6300 93200 4410 CHARGE FOR SERVICES 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,00( MISCELLANEOUS 6300 93300 4610 EARNINGS ON INVESTMENTS 30,000 40,000 40,000 40,00( 6300 93300 4820 COMPENSATION FOR LOSSES 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,00( TOTAL MISCELLANEOUS 70,000 80,000 80,000 80,00( TOTAL INSURANCE FUND 1,820.000 1,830.000 1,830,000 1,830,00( 453 INSURANCE FUND SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES 2009 2008 2009 2009 2009 Fund Orq Expenditure Function Budget Request Recommend Final 6300 93200 WORKERS COMPENSATION 1,122,300 1,197,300 1,197,300 1,197,300 6300 93300 LIABILITY 517,700 632,700 632,700 632,700 TOTAL INSURANCE FUND 1,640,000 1,830.000 1.830.000 1.830.000 454 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: IS - INSURANCE BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Insurance Fund -- 6300-93200/93300 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: Central fund to provide county-wide insurance coverage. Administered by Finance and Administration unit in the General Fund. ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED FINAL RESOURCES LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Supplies 1,238 500 500 500 Purchased Services 21,504 31,700 31,700 31,700 Fixed Charges 1,450,308 1,607,800 1,797,800 1,797,800 Capital 0 0 0 0 Gross County Cost $ 1,473,050 $ 1,640,000 $ 1,830,000 $ 1,830,000 Revenue/Fund Bal. 222,497 140,000 330,000 330,000 Net County Cost $ 1,250,553 $ 1,500,000 $ 1,500,000 $ 1,500,000 Budget Positions - - - - - - - - SUMMARY OF CHANGES: The budget is structured with Weld County remaining a member of CAPP, but using the self-insured option under the insurance pool for a fixed cost of $332,200. Effective January 1, 1992,Weld County became self-insured for workers compensation. Workers Compensation includes excess insurance and bonds costing$300,000,claims administration costs of $25,000, and a loss fund of $867,300. A loss fund for all other coverages is budgeted at $300,000. Unemployment insurance is being charged directly to departments. The program is supported by property tax ($1,500,000), charges for service ($250,000), interest ($40,000), and compensation for losses ($40,000). No fund balance reserves are anticipated to be needed to support the loss fund in 2009. OBJECTIVES: Provide county-wide insurance coverage in most cost effective manner possible. 455 INSURANCE FUND (CONTINUED) 6300-93300 PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Work Outputs Number of training sessions 36 36 36 Number of workers compensation claims 106 110 110 Dollar amount of prop/casualty claims paid $185,000 $185,000 $250,000 Efficiency Measures FTE'S per 10,000/capita 0.044 0.043 0.041 Per capita cost (county support) $5.51 $6.42 $6.15 Cost per claim processed $227.27 $220.00 $220.00 Effectiveness Measures (desired results) Number of employees trained 525 550 550 Average loss per workers comp claim $7,605 $7,885 $7,385 Percent increase/decrease in number of claims 3% 0% 0% FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval of the insurance program as outlined above in the summary of changes. In accordance with Section 8-44-204, C.R.S., it is recommended that a mill levy be used to fund the insurance program for local county activities and a charge back mechanism be used only for programs funded by state and federal funding sources. Weld County,through CAPP, has reduced limits of coverage and placed reliance on sovereign immunity to stay within the budgeted amount. The legislative changes in 1986 strengthened the county's position in the use of sovereign immunity limits in Colorado cases. In addition, the county can levy up to 10 mills per year to discharge any judgment against it. Continuation of the self-insured program for workers compensation is recommended,which should result in cost savings, plus no shared risks with other counties. Unemployment costs are recommended to be charged directly to departments for revenue raising strategies and departmental accountability for costs. BOARD ACTION: Approved as recommended. 456 PHONE SERVICES FUND SUMMARY OF REVENUES 200 2008 2009 2009 2009 Fund Org Acct Account Title Budget Request Recommend Final CHARGE FOR SERVICES 6400 17400 4410 CHARGE FOR SERVICES 1,079,414 1,130,705 1,130,705 1,130,70: TOTAL PHONE SERVICES FUND 1,079,414 1,130,705 1,130,705 1,130,705 457 PHONE SERVICES FUND SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES 2009 2008 2009 2009 2009 Fund Org Expenditure Function Budget Request Recommend Final 6400 17400 PHONE SERVICES 1,579,414 1,380,705 1,380,705 1,380,705 TOTAL PHONE SERVICES FUND 1,579,414 1,380,705 1,380,705 1.380,705 458 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Phone Services -- 6400-17400 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: Provide phone services to Weld County and the Court system. ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED FINAL RESOURCES LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 142,033 $ 156,854 $ 158,837 $ 158,837 Supplies 22,285 14,500 14,500 14,500 Purchased Services 731,663 701,057 762,178 762,178 Fixed Charges 137,984 207,003 195,190 195,190 Capital 91,443 500,000 250,000 250,000 Gross County Cost $ 1,125,408 $ 1,579,414 $ 1,380,705 $ 1,380,705 Revenue 1,136,187 1,079,414 1,130,705 1,130,705 Net County Cost $ -10,779 $ 500,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 Budget Positions 2 2 2 2 SUMMARY OF CHANGES: Salaries are up $1,983. Printing is up $2,000 to cover historical patterns. Phone line charges are up$18,960 due to usage, contract payments increased $15,000 for outside support, and repair and maintenance is up $25,161. Overhead is down $11,813. Capital is funded at $250,000 to accommodate the new facilities in 2009, i.e. Human Services, Crime Lab, and Community Corrections. Revenues are up $51,291. OBJECTIVES: To operate and maintain all county phone systems, including research for replacement, improved productivity, and other service requests. 459 PHONE SERVICES (CONTINUED) 6400-17400 PERFORMANCE MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED Work Outputs Incoming calls 5,800,000 6,100,000 6,300,000 Efficiency Measures FTE's per 10,000/capita 0.088 0.086 0.032 Per capita cost (county support) $4.22 $6.77 $5.66 Annual cost per call $0.17 $0.18 $0.19 Effectiveness Measures (desired results) Process requests for service within 7 days 100% 100% 100% FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. BOARD ACTION: Approved as recommended. 460 BUDGET UNIT REQUEST SUMMARY AGENCY/DEPARTMENT NAME: WELD COUNTY FINANCE AUTHORITY BUDGET UNIT TITLE AND NUMBER: Weld County Finance Authority -- 6500-17700 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: Provides funds to cover the lease/purchase of county buildings. ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED FINAL RESOURCES LAST FY CURRENT FY NEXT FY NEXT FY Personnel Services $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Supplies 0 0 0 0 Purchased Services 0 0 0 0 Fixed Charges 5,941,271 0 0 0 Capital 0 0 0 0 Gross County Cost $ 5,941,271 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Revenue 509,591 0 0 0 Net County Cost $ 5,431,680 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Budget Positions - - - - - - - - SUMMARY OF CHANGES: Budget reflects the county's debt service on any long-term debt and/or any lease purchase debt in any given year. With the payoff of the correctional facilities' Certificates of Participation (COP) as of August 1, 2007, Weld County has no long-term debt or long-term lease obligations. OBJECTIVES: n/a FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. BOARD ACTION: Approved as recommended. 461 #, ,cfit IIMc GLOSSARY ACCOUNTING PROCEDURES All processes which discover, record, classify, and summarize financial information to produce financial reports and to provide internal control. ACCRUAL BASIS The basis of accounting under which transactions are recognized when they occur, regardless of the timing of related cash flows. ACCRUED EXPENSES Expenses incurred but not due until a later date. ACTIVITY A specific and distinguishable line of work performed by one or more organizational components of a government for the purpose of accomplishing a function for which the government is responsible. For example, "food inspection" is an activity performed in the discharge of the "health" function. ACTIVITY CLASSIFICATION Expenditure classification according to the specific lines of work performed by organization units. For example, "sewage treatment and disposal", "garbage collection", "garbage disposal", and "street cleaning" are activities performed in carrying out the function of"sanitation". The segregation of the expenditures made for each of these activities constitutes an activity classification. ALLOCATE To divide a lump-sum appropriation into parts which are designated for expenditure by specific organizational units and/or for specific purposes, activities, or objects. ALLOCATED COSTS Indirect costs distributed to programs or departments via a cost allocation plan. ALLOCATION A part of a lump-sum appropriation which is designated for expenditure by specific organizational units and/or for special purposes, activities, or objects. ALLOT To divide an appropriation into amounts which may be encumbered or expended during an allotment period. ALLOTMENT A part of an appropriation which may be encumbered or expended during an allotment period. ALLOTMENT PERIOD A period of time less than one fiscal year in length during which an allotment is effective. Bi-monthly and quarterly allotment periods are most common. ANNUAL BUDGET A budget applicable to a single fiscal year. 463 APPROPRIATION A legal authorization granted by a legislative body to make expenditures and to incur obligations for specific purposes. An appropriation is usually limited in amount and as to the time when it may be expended. APPROPRIATION BILL, ORDINANCE, RESOLUTION, or ORDER A bill, ordinance, resolution, or order by means of which appropriations are given legal effect. It is the method by which the expenditure side of the annual operating budget is enacted into law by the legislative body. In many governmental jurisdictions, appropriations cannot be enacted into law by resolution but only by a bill, ordinance, or order. APPROPRIATION EXPENDITURE An expenditure chargeable to an appropriation. Since virtually all expenditures of governments are chargeable to appropriations, the term expenditures by itself is widely and properly used. ASSESSED VALUATION A valuation set upon real estate or other property by a government as a basis for levying taxes. AUTHORITY A government or public agency created to perform a single function or a restricted group of related activities. Usually such units are financed from service charges, fees, and tolls, but in some instances they also have taxing powers. An authority may be completely independent of other governments or partially dependent upon other governments for its creation, its financing, or the exercise of certain powers. AUTHORIZED POSITION A position (job) authorized by the Board of County Commissioners as part of the annual adopted budget. BOND An interest bearing promise to pay with a specific maturity. BUDGET A plan of financial operation embodying an estimate of proposed expenditures for a given period and the proposed means of financing them. Used without any modifier, the term usually indicates a financial plan for a single fiscal year. The term "budget" is used in two senses in practice. Sometimes it designates the financial plan presented to the appropriating body for adoption and sometimes the plan finally approved by that body. It is usually necessary to specify whether the budget under consideration is preliminary and tentative or whether it has been approved by the appropriating body. 464 BUDGET DOCUMENT The instrument used by the budget-making authority to present a comprehensive financial program to the appropriating body. The budget document usually consists of three parts. The first part contains a message from the budget-making authority, together with a summary of the proposed expenditures and the means of financing them. The second consists of schedules supporting the summary. These schedules show in detail the information as to past years' actual revenues, expenditures, and other data used in making the estimates. The third part is composed of drafts of the appropriation, revenue, and borrowing measures necessary to put the budget into effect. BUDGET MESSAGE A general discussion of the proposed budget as presented in writing by the budget-making authority to the legislative body. The budget message should contain an explanation of the principal budget items, an outline of the government's experience during the past period and its financial status at the time of the message, and recommendations regarding the financial policy for the coming period. BUDGETARY ACCOUNTS Accounts used to enter the formally adopted annual operating budget into the general ledger as part of the management control technique of formal budgetary integration. BUDGETARY COMPARISONS Governmental GAAP financial reports must include comparisons of approved budgeted amounts with actual results of operations. Such reports should be subjected to an independent audit, so that all parties involved in the annual operating budget/legal appropriation process are provided with assurances that government monies are spent in accordance with the mutually agreed-upon budgetary plan. BUDGETARY CONTROL The control or management of a government or enterprise in accordance with an approved budget for the purpose of keeping expenditures within the limitations of available appropriations and available revenues. BUDGETARY EXPENDITURES Decreases in net current assets. In contrast to conventional expenditures, budgetary expenditures are limited in amount to exclude amounts represented by noncurrent liabilities. Due to their spending measurement focus, governmental fund types are concerned with the measurement of budgetary expenditures. BUDGETED FUNDS Funds that are planned for certain uses but have not been formally or legally appropriated by the legislative body. The budget document that is submitted for Board approval is composed of budgeted funds. CALLABLE BONDS Bonds which are redeemable by the issuer prior to the maturity date at a specified price at or above par. 465 CAPITAL BUDGET A plan of proposed capital outlays and the means of financing them. CAPITAL OUTLAY Expenditures for equipment,vehicles,or machinery that results in the acquisition or addition to fixed assets. CAPITAL PROGRAM A plan for capital expenditures to be incurred each year over a fixed period of years to meet capital needs arising from the long-term work program or otherwise. It sets forth each project or other contemplated expenditure in which the government is to have a part and specifies the full resources estimated to be available to finance the projected expenditures. CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND A fund created to account for financial resources to be used for the acquisition or construction of major capital facilities (other than those financed by proprietary funds, Special Assessment Funds, and Trust Funds). CAPITAL RESOURCES Resources of a fixed or permanent character, such as land and buildings, which cannot ordinarily be used to meet current expenditures. CERTIFICATES OF PARTICIPATION(COP) Form of financial instrument similar to a bond to facilitate lease/ purchase agreements. Not a debt of the County. CONSERVATION TRUST State of Colorado lottery funds remitted to the County for parks and recreation use. CONTINGENCY ACCOUNT A budgetary reserve set aside for emergencies or unforeseen expenditures not otherwise included in the budget. CONTINUING APPROPRIATION An appropriation which, once established, is automatically renewed without further legislative action, period after period, until altered or revoked. The term should not be confused with INDETERMINATE APPROPRIATION. COPS UHS Federal community oriented policing grant. COST ALLOCATION PLAN Identification, accumulation and distribution of costs relative to the provision of those services, along with the methods used. C. R. S. Colorado Revised Statutes DA District Attorney DEFAULT Failure to pay principal or interest when due. Defaults can also occur for failure to meet nonpayment obligations, such as reporting requirements, or when a material problem occurs for the issuer, such as a bankruptcy. 466 DEFICIT (1) The excess of the liabilities of a fund over its assets. (2) The excess of expenditures over revenues during an accounting period; or, in the case of proprietary funds, the excess of expense over income during an accounting period. DEPRECIATION (1) Expiration in the service life of fixed assets, other than wasting assets attributable to wear and tear, deterioration, action of the physical elements,inadequacy,and obsolescence. (2)The portion of the cost of a fixed asset other than a wasting asset which is charged as an expense during a particular period. In accounting for depreciation,the cost of a fixed asset, less any salvage value, is prorated over the estimated service life of such an asset, and each period is charged with a portion of such cost. Through this process, the entire cost of the asset is ultimately charged off as an expense. DIRECT COSTS Costs that have a clearly identifiable beneficial or causal relationship to the services performed. DURATION The weighted maturity of a fixed-income investment's cash flows, used in the estimation of the price sensitivity of fixed-income securities for a given change in interest rates. EDAP Economic Development Action Partnership. ENCUMBRANCES Obligations in the form of purchase orders, contracts or salary commitments which are chargeable to an appropriation and for which a part of the appropriation is reserved. They cease to be encumbrances when paid or when an actual liability is set up. ENTERPRISE FUND A fund established to finance and account for the acquisition, operation and maintenance of governmental facilities and services which are entirely or predominantly self-supporting by user charges. The Paramedic Services operates as an Enterprise Fund. ESTIMATED REVENUE The amount of projected revenue to be collected during the fiscal year. The amount of revenue appropriated is the amount approved by the Board. EXPENDITURES Decreases in net financial resources. Expenditures include current operating expenses which require the current or future use of net current assets, debt service, and capital outlays. The unmodified use of the term expenditures in this text is intended to mean budgetary expenditures. FISCAL PERIOD Any period at the end of which a government determines its financial position and the results of its operations. 467 FISCAL YEAR A 12-month period to which the annual operating budget applies and at the end of which a government determines its financial position and the results of its operations. FIXED ASSETS Assets of a long-term character which are intended to continue to be held or used, such as land, buildings, improvements other than buildings, machinery and equipment. FTE(FULL-TIME EQUIVALENT) Numeric equivalent of one person occupying one employment position for one year(equivalent of 2,080 hours or 52 forty-hour weeks). FUNCTION A group of related activities aimed at accomplishing a major service or regulatory program for which a government is responsible. For example, public health is a function. FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION Expenditure classification according to the principal purposes for which expenditures are made. Examples are public safety, public health, public welfare, etc. FUND A fiscal and accounting entity with a self-balancing set of accounts recording cash and other financial resources,together with all related liabilities and residual equities or balances, and changes therein, which are segregated for the purpose of carrying on specific activities or attaining certain objectives in accordance with special regulations, restrictions,or limitations. FUND BALANCE Fund balance is the excess of assets over liabilities and is therefore also known as surplus funds. GAAP(GENERALLY ACCEPTED ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLES) Standards for financial accounting and reporting. GENERAL FUND The fund used to account for all financial resources except those required to be accounted for in another fund. GENERAL OBLIGATION BOND A municipal bond secured by the pledge of the issuer's full faith, credit and taxing power. GEOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION SYSTEM(GIS) A computerized data base of all land attributes within the County. The"base map"contains the least amount of common data which is supplemented by attribute overlays. 468 GRANT A contribution by a government or other organization to support a particular function. Grants may be classified as either categorical or block depending upon the amount of discretion allowed the grantee. HIGHWAY USER TAX(HUTF) Revenue that is derived from the state gasoline tax, and restricted for Road and Bridge activities. INDETERMINATE APPROPRIATION An appropriation which is not limited either to any definite period of time or to any definite amount. A distinction must be made between an indeterminate appropriation and a continuing appropriation. In the first place, whereas a continuing appropriation is indefinite only as to time, an indeterminate appropriation is indefinite as to both time and amount. In the second place, even indeterminate appropriations which are indefinite only as to time are to be distinguished from continuing appropriations in that such indeterminate appropriations may eventually lapse. For example, an appropriation to construct a building may be made to continue in effect until the building is constructed. Once the building is completed, however, the unexpended balance of the appropriation lapses. A continuing appropriation, on the other hand, may continue forever; it can only be abolished by specific action of the legislative body. INDIRECT COSTS Costs associated with, but not directly attributable to, the providing of a product or service. These costs are usually incurred by other departments in the support of operating departments. INTERFUND TRANSFER Amounts transferred from one fund to another. INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE Revenue received from another government for a specified purpose. In Weld County, these are funds from municipalities, the State of Colorado, and the Federal Government. INTERNAL SERVICE FUND Funds used to account for the financing of goods or services provided by one department to another department on a cost reimbursement basis, for example, the Printing and Supply Fund and the Computer Services Fund. LINE-ITEM BUDGET A budget that lists each expenditure category(salary, materials, telephone service, travel, etc.)separately, along with the dollar amount budgeted for each specified category. MANDATE Any responsibility, action or procedure that is imposed by one sphere of government on another through constitutional, legislative, administrative, executive, or judicial action as a direct order or that is required as a condition of aid. 469 MATURITY The date when the principal amount of a security is payable. MILL LEVY(TAX RATE) Rate applied to assessed valuation to determine property taxes. A mill is 1/10th of a penny, or $1.00 of tax for each $1,000 of assessed valuation. MODIFIED ACCRUAL BASIS The accrual basis of accounting adapted to the governmental fund type Spending Measurement Focus. Under it, revenues are recognized when they become both "measurable" and "available to finance expenditures of the current period". Expenditures are recognized when the related fund liability is incurred except for: (1) inventories of materials and supplies which may be considered expenditures either when purchased or when used; (2) prepaid insurance and similar items which need not be reported; (3) accumulated unpaid vacation, sick pay, and other employee benefit amounts which need not be recognized in the current period, but for which larger-than-normal accumulations must be disclosed in the notes to the financial statements; (4) interest on special assessment indebtedness which may be recorded when due rather than accrued, if approximately offset by interest earnings on special assessment levies; and (5) principal and interest on long-term debt which are generally recognized when due. All governmental funds and Expendable Trust Funds are accounted for using the modified accrual basis of accounting. NET BUDGET The net budget eliminates double-counting in the budget, such as fund transfers, and thus represents the true level of programmed spending in the budget. NON-DEPARTMENTAL A category established to account for expenses not associated with any specific department, but all departments or many, within a fund. OBJECT As used in expenditure classification, this term applies to the article purchased or the service obtained(as distinguished from the results obtained from expenditures). Examples are personal services,contractual services,materials,and supplies. 470 OPERATING BUDGET Plans of current expenditures and the proposed means of financing them. The annual operating budget (or, in the case of some state governments, the biennial operating budget) is the primary means by which most of the financing acquisition, spending, and service delivery activities of a government are controlled. The use of annual operating budgets is usually required by law. Even where not required by law, however, annual operating budgets are essential to sound financial management and should be adopted by every government. OPERATING EXPENSES Proprietary fund expenses which are directly related to the fund's primary service activities. OPERATING GRANTS Grants which are restricted by the grantor to operating purposes or which may be used for either capital or operating purposes at the discretion of the grantee. OPERATING INCOME The excess of proprietary fund operating revenues over operating expenses. OPERATING TRANSFER Routine and/or recurring transfers of assets between funds. ORGANIZATIONAL UNIT A responsibility center within a government. ORGANIZATION UNIT CLASSIFICATION Expenditure classification according to responsibility centers within a government's organization structure. Classification of expenditures by organization unit is essential to fixing stewardship responsibility for individual government resources. OVERHEAD Those elements of cost necessary in the production of an article or the performance of a service which are of such a nature that the amount applicable to the product or service cannot be determined accurately or readily. Usually they relate to those objects of expenditure which do not become an integral part of the finished product or service such as rent, heat, light, supplies, management, supervision, etc. PROGRAM An organized set of related work activities which are directed toward a common purpose or goal and represent a well defined expenditure of county resources. PROGRAM BUDGET A budget wherein expenditures are based primarily on programs of work and secondarily on character and object class. A program budget is a transitional type of budget between the traditional character and object class budget, on the one hand, and the performance budget, on the other. 471 PROPRIETARY FUND A fund used to account for business-type activities in government. The activities are usually financed with user fees that are directly related to the services received. There are two types of proprietary funds - enterprise and internal service funds. RATINGS Designations used by credit rating agencies to give relative indications of credit quality. RECIDIVISM A relapse into criminal habits after punishment. REGISTERED BOND A bond whose owner is registered with the issuer or its agent. Transfer of ownership can only be accomplished when the securities are properly endorsed by the registered owner. REIMBURSEMENTS (1) Repayments of amounts remitted on behalf of another party. (2) Interfund transactions which constitute reimbursements of a fund for expenditures or expenses initially made from it which are properly applicable to another fund --e.g., an expenditure properly chargeable to a Special Revenue Fund was initially made from the General Fund, which is subsequently reimbursed. They are recorded as expenditures or expenses (as appropriate) in the reimbursing fund and as reductions of the expenditure or expense in the fund that is reimbursed. RESERVE (1) An account used to earmark a portion of fund balance to indicate that it is not appropriate for expenditure. (2) An account used to earmark a portion of fund equity as legally segregated for a specific future use. RESIDUAL EQUITY TRANSFER Non-recurring or non-routine transfers of assets between funds. REVENUE (1) Increases in governmental fund type net current assets from other than expenditure refunds and residual equity transfers. Under NCGA Statement 1, general long-term debt proceeds and operating transfers-in are classified as "other financing sources" rather than revenues. (2) Increases in proprietary fund type net total assets from other than expense refunds, capital contributions, and residual equity transfers. Under NCGA Statement 1, operating transfers-in are classified separately from revenues. REVENUE BOND A municipal bond payable from revenues derived from tolls, charges or rents paid by users of the facility constructed with the proceeds of the bond issue. 472 SOURCE OF REVENUE Revenues are classified according to their source or point of origin. SPECIAL REVENUE FUND A fund used to account for revenues legally earmarked for a particular purpose. SUBACTIVITY A specific line of work performed in carrying out a governmental activity. For example, "cleaning luminaries" and "replacing defective street lamps"would be subactivities under the activity of"street light maintenance". SUBFUNCTION A grouping of related activities within a particular governmental function. For example, "police" is a subfunction of the function "public safety". SURPLUS The use of the term "surplus" in governmental accounting is generally discouraged because it creates a potential for misleading inference. TABOR (TAXPAYERS BILL OF RIGHTS) An amendment to the Colorado Constitution approved by the voters in November 1992. The Taxpayers Bill of Rights has been incorporated in the State Constitution as Section 20 of Article X. The amendment limits growth in both state and local government revenue and expenditures, makes provision for annual elections,and requires voter approval for tax increases. TABOR RESERVE Term applied to a reserve which is required by the TABOR Amendment. Starting in 1995 this reserve is 3%of"Fiscal Year Spending" excluding bonded debt service. This reserve is for use in declared emergencies only. TANF Temporary Assistance to Needy Families. TAXES Compulsory charges levied by a government for the purpose of financing services performed for the common benefit. This term does not include specific charges made against particular persons or property for current or permanent benefits such as special assessments. Neither does the term include charges for services rendered only to those paying such charges as,for example, sewer service charges. TAX LEVY The total amount to be raised by general property taxes. TAX RATE The amount of tax stated in terms of a unit of the tax base; for example, 25 mills per dollar of assessed valuation of taxable property. 473 TAX RATE LIMIT The maximum rate at which a government may levy a tax. The limit may apply to taxes raised for a particular purpose, or to taxes imposed for all purposes, and may apply to a single government, to a class of governments, or to all governments operating in a particular area. Overall tax rate limits usually restrict levies for all purposes and of all governments,state and local, having jurisdiction in a given area. TAX ROLL The official list showing the amount of taxes levied against each taxpayer or property. Frequently, the tax roll and the assessment roll are combined, but even in these cases the two can be distinguished. TRADITIONAL BUDGET A term sometimes applied to the budget of a government wherein expenditures are based entirely or primarily on objects of expenditure. UNC University of Northern Colorado UNINCORPORATED COUNTY Those portions of the county that are not part of a legal entity such as a city or some towns. WELL PROGRAM Wellness health program provided as a fringe benefit to employees. WORKLOAD MEASURES Specific quantitative and qualitative measures of work performed as an objective of the department. WORK PROGRAM A plan of work proposed to be done during a particular period by the administrative agency in carrying out its assigned activities. WORK UNIT A fixed quantity which will consistently measure work effort expended in the performance of an activity or the production of a commodity. YIELD The annual percentage rate of return earned on a security. Yield is a function of a security's purchase price and coupon interest rate. NOTE: Most of the above definitions were taken from Governmental Accounting, Auditing, and Financial Reporting, GFOA, Chicago, 1980, Appendix B. pp. 53-77. 474 COUNTY OF WELD STATE OF COLORADO Operating Indicators by Function/Program Last Eight Years Fiscal Year 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 Function/Program General government: Motor vehicle registration 478.727 294,019 305,879 433,188 439,146 462,877 466,777 484.412 Registered voters(1) 80,041 79,289 85,161 76,245 98,692 99.711 100.924 88,601 Number of votes cast(2) 65,317 22,422 56,730 32,476 89,099 46,327 68,871 30,203 Percent of registered voters voting 81.6% 28.3% 66.6% 42.6% 90.3% 46.5% 68.2% 34.1% Public safety: Adult arrests 1.457 1,520 1.435 2,738 1,387 1,543 1,574 1,606 Juvenile arrests 250 220 337 491 218 206 215 224 Average secure jail population 303 298 330 371 402 455 579 628 E911 calls 55,807 52,000 84,420 72,396 75,276 79,425 92.045 95,524 Building Permits 2,190 2,180 2.082 1,941 2.012 2,082 1,972 2,081 Valuation(thousands) $143,856 $148,426 $125,336 $201,442 $132,178 $104,225 $399,473 $90,446 Public works: Miles of road graveled 427 440 440 440 401 401 160 359 Snow removal lane miles 1370 1390 1390 1,406 33,710 78,435 125,225 222,703 Grading lane miles 123,718 131,171 131,171 126,000 175,910 165,681 164,906 135,779 Miles of Upgrade-Aggregate Surfaced Roads 26 5 5 8 10 0 10 34 Culverts(new and repaired)15'and larger 204 240 240 240 217 217 242 250 Tons of asphalt laid 102,221 80.055 80,055 101,243 95,634 95.634 70,421 67,389 Tons of gravel crushed 490.000 500000 500,000 510.000 487.477 487,477 408,409 411.582 Health and welfare: Social Services Caseload 9.900 9,900 9.900 9.900 12,000 14,000 14,500 15,000 Patient contacts 17.271 16,207 16,207 14,601 15,000 11,000 30.440 11,880 Immunizations 15.979 17,730 5,848 4,600 7,500 6,900 6.360 7,165 Culture and recreation: Visitors-Missile Park 700 700 695 558 575 575 586 595 County Fair Exhibitors — 5,000 2,370 2,410 2.410 2,220 2,422 2,326 Economic assistance: Headstart dents 524 537 577 641 622 562 562 562 Migrant Headstart clients 250 99 200 146 175 266 266 266 Business-type activities: Paramedic Services Patients transported 6.973 6,687 7,027 7,060 7,331 7,284 8,375 8,210 Source:Various Weld County Department records. Note: (1)Beginning in 1999 the number of registered voters reflects active voters. (2)Even years represent general elections.odd years coordinated elections. 475 Consumer Price Index All Urban Consumers — (CPI-U) ammo Percent Change U.S. Denser 18% - - - -Los Angeles Chicago New York 16% — 14% 12% I li \ 10% t 8% 6% \ ip, • 2% ' ,1 x's 0% 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08*09* * Projections from Colorado Legislative Council 2007—U.S. =2.9% Denver=2.2% *2008—U.S.=4.1% Denver=3.5% *2009—U.S. =3.5% Denver=3.2% http://www.state.co.us/gov_dir/leg_dir/lcsstaff/lcs/focus/2008/08forecast0620.pdf 476 Other Indicators Increases in Health Insurance Premiums Compared with Other Indicators CPI-U—All Urban Consumers • 25% 20% ------ 15% --- 10% -- -- --- 5% --- 0% 2002 2003 2004 ' 2005 2006 2007 Proj 08 Proj 09 MOM Pay Increases-Colo 3.6% 3.2% 3.2% 3.4% 3.6% 3.6% 3.5% 3.6% -Health Ins. Increases 22.0% 18.0% 16.0% 11.0% 11.0% 11.0% 12.0% 11.0% -CPI-Denmer 1.9% 1.1% 0.1% 2.1% 3.6% 2.2% 3.5% 3.2% - - - -CPI-U.S. 1.6% 2.3% 2.7% 3.4% 3.2% 2.9% 4.1% 3.5% Health insurance premium increases extracted from MSEC Health&Welfare Plans Survey Economic indicators from Colorado Legislative Council 477 2009 Average Pay Increase Projections Denver/Boulder Industry Type vs. Ten County '; Denver/Boulder—10 County 3.0% 4.4% 3.8% 3.8% 3.8% A 3.6% 3.6% 3.1% 3.2% 3.3% 3.3% 3•4% 3.4% � i erg... � ,.gkn 477 iv':,16.' § t Q .£. ,NL :';'4.. ems gG. J- ,�v .i Y '" 4.. K4 t b � �'(. ir Ffi' .. t °: �' .:i4:1.. y�Y E� 4 A 7...;4 i, A D., k."., � 'M. �4.. 4, 4 k-i. lit..7.4 sxfi� .$ fi �P 'fY TN N Ig�t. I.eyy -4 u J°P c�ec� c• #oe qsip ,Soot G�,`ca";" ' Pay Increase Projections Historical Denver/Boulder vs. Ten County y � tY .�yy:rereeeyy.. • jj�� y m4s 'j k HAS" ;)t£a� 4 yi2 rt 4.- `,} Ne c ,- e,4IA xaap ze ` c'I�y�y; xd; '*A 9 iv, fj: v AS 2 l"e"er�≥,e0. to 1, "`+le IS. $�§� r 4Y ips •1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 Proj 2008 t Denier/Boulder 4.4% 4.5% 4.8% 4.8% 4.4% 3.7% 3.2% 3.2% 3.5% 3.6% 3.6% 3.5% —10 County 4.7% 4.1% 4.4% 3.9% 4.1% 4.6% 4.0% 2.4% 2.9% 3.4% 3.5% 4.0% 478 Rate Range Adjustments - Industry Breakdown On average, the projected adjustments to rate ranges for 2009 are as follows: Hourly Clerical/ Average Production/ Technical Salaried Executive! Projected Industry Maintenance Non-Exempt Exempt Officer Increase Government 2.4% 2.2% 2.3% 2.2% 2.3% Manufacturing 2.2% 2.3% 2.4% 2.3% 2.3% Non-Profit 1.8% 1.8% 1.7% 1.8% 1.8% Software/Hardware 2.2% 2.2% 2.5% 2.0% 2.2% Construction 2.1% 2.1% 2.1% 2.1% 2.1% Oil & Gas No Data 2.8% 2.8% 2.8% 2.8% Mining 2.3% 2.3% 4.8% 4.8% 3.5% Finance/Real Estate 2.0% 2.3 % 2.2% 2.3% 2.2% Health Care 2.4% 2.4% 2.4% 2.2% 2.4% Retail/Wholesale 2.9% 2.1% 1.8% 2.7% 2.3% Service 1.8% 2.4% 2.7% 2.1% 2.3% Insurance 3.3% 2.7% 2.9% 3.0% 2.9% Utilities/Trans./Comm. 2.9% 2.8% 3.1% 2.8% 2.9% ALL ORGANIZATIONS 2.3% 2.3% 2.4% 2.2% 2.3% 0%/3% MODE * 0% (bimodal) 3.0% 0% 0%** * Most commonly occurring percent in the sample- **20% of respondents. (19% of respondents reported a 3.0%projection; 16% reported a 2.0%projection.) 2009 Average Rate Range Projections 4.0% 3.0% - 2.o000: : 1. I 0.0% I I I I I I I I I I I I ,ca a oe Gay ce It .$* \ye cr `Ge ace mot° roc er J �c O \xdA Cr rac` Qua ace\eG�e Goc t' al o IIIIIIIII Industry Type —All Organizations 2.3% 479 Turnover All Employees - Denver/Boulder vs. Ten County • 10 County a Denver/Boulder zag in en 0 o e in RJ ri7 A nmn e e 0 e 4 r it CD N CD ag WI zag o N o r N N Jr • 0 • 69 ' • o It 1. I .... I I I I I • I I I I I 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 Voluntary Separations - Denver/Boulder vs. Ten County • 10 County Denver/Boulder ag cc o C C N rn N aY} e i co a e t. — e 1 n e e n n r Co CO ^ e 'am'F r r In M e • se F M: i11 ^ - rerYOFa o 07Qn. E' tykX au '...$.-., I I .r� I .s, I I I 1 I 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 480 . : .:........ ....... .....:»,..... ..•...:: :r:._+. ,:;......: ...... - - Vii• F:• y4n- ,tr't. - , it i ,» '; "W de ?r`• ` ,y:xir,,i4il f:c u.P:itgi, X i} tt� :,;.§j,,,,,f•.,....,..!,,_ r:i ,i44:;14.41,!,,;. ..> -1ti t..r a Ny x^i''' a .i':"--':'7,17'1" -%.'a rt .i v ki• s< j ' Ir 3 I i,. .r a Ai�'r:'�c-'" .F-"�'.--- = s i,',2r^^1,7:4 krr rtety �f§ „,.?: ,a i f,y..rl4i: n i ar '+ , 'A`- 'n'< it ii 1 A..Gk,Ld AD V 'updated 2009 f., r-ur iii 4{a ..?. ... �f ECONOMY Council for Community&Economic Research 2007 Rate of Inflation (Based on CPI) 2007 Per Capita Income (formerly ACCRA)Cost of Living 3rd Quarter 2007 Denver/Boulder/Greeley +2.19% Weld County Colorado U.S.Average Metro Area 100%Composite Index United States +2.28% $26,280 $40,387 $36,978 Boston,MA 136.6 Flagstaff,AZ 119.1 Chicago,IL 109.9 Reno.NV 109.7 ...a,.:�:::xi 2i,,,,,,ei,45',.:?:.M4s=r ih':t4it:F.::::r::,',:G::?:.:r$E:d'.t:+::3::. ..... ,:;.:... _::_ ...:.; x,R �.. •m � .. m . ..., _�. - ;�: . Bakersfield,CA 108.5 } g 3 s, Li i Olympia.WA 106.3 ��Cgtlhty Avet'�ge k#ouseho`l&•tino4ttte � -,, � � 2006 2001 %Change ,`r. ?; tt•:. Denver,CO 105.0 Las Cruces,NM 103.6 $63,544 $64,487 1.5% u T ! Cheyenne.WY 99.9 f"` GREELEY,CO 99.7 POPULATION Population Charactet1st€cs Weld County Population Wald Co. Greeley 1990 2000 July 2006 1990 2000 July 2006 1990 191 621 60 454 Census Census Estimate Census Census Estimate 2000 ' 180,928 76,930 Weld County 131,821 180,936 236,908 New Raymer 98 91 101 2003 Estimate', 209,909 84,519 Ault 1,107 1,432 1,450 Northglenn(MCP) - 12 12 2011 Projection 288,025 94,176 Berthoud(MCP) - 16 36 Nunn 324 471 534 RACE/ETHNICITY Brighton(MCP) 17 154 229 Pierce 823 884 878 One race Broomfield(MCP) 4 10 n/a Platteville 1,515 2,370 2,65! White 80.94% 78.89% Dacono 2.228 3,015 3,759 Severance 106 597 2,618 Black/AfricanA.mer'oan .64% 1.03% Eaton 1.959 2,690 4,122 Windsor(MCP) 5,062 9,612 11,884 Amer.Indian/Alaskan Native .96% 85% Erie(MCP) 1,244 2,009 6.496 Unincorporated 33,002 41,832 44,498 Asian .97% 1.04% Evans 5,876 9,514 17,351 Native Hawaiian/Patific tsl. .12% .20% Firestone 1,358 1.908 7,132 MCP=Matti County Place Some other race alone 13.75% 14.72% Fort Lupton 5.159 6,787 7,206 Two or?pore races 2.63% 2.90% Frederick 988 2,467 7,370 Hispanic or Latino 27.99% 31.88% Garden City 199 357 349 Greater ar2,ele Non Hispanic of Latino 72.01% 68.12% Gilcrest 1,084 7,162 1.162 y LANGUAGE2006 Population Estirnatc Greeley 60454 76,930 90,285 109,834 English Only speaking 79.70% 78.90% Grover 135 153 156 ii. Spanish Speaking 18.20% 18.50% Hudson 918 1,565 1,606 .! `includes Evans,Garden City,Greeley&LaSalle AGE DISTRIBUTION Johnstown(MCP) 1,579 3,827 8,000 iii- y" Under 18 27.19% 24.78% Keenesburg 570 855 1,187 i,i,t July 2006vi l 1844 43.58% 47.52% Kersey 980 1.389 1.481 Regional Population Estimates 45-64 20.92% 18,71°10 La Salle 1,803 1.849 1,943 i Over64 8.30% 8.98% Loveland 58,867 Adams 413,121.,' Lochbuie 1.168 2,049 3,703 •':Fort Collins 127,658 Boulder County 284,197 MEDIAN AGE 31,21 29.88 Longmont(MCP) - 24 31 'CL ongmont 82,904 Lanmer County 275,587:: HOUSING UNITS 80,773 31,968 Mead 456 2,017 2,881 ' ;:Brighton 30.197 -• AVG.HOUSEHOLD SIZE 2.82 2.65 Milliken 1,605 2,888 5.887 . EMPLOYMENT AND WAGES 2006 Average Annual Wage— 2006 Weld Occupational Hourly Wage— 2006 Regional Turnover Information— All Industries All Industries All Industries Weld County S35,256 Entry Level 5856 Weld County 12.4% Adams County $y 208 Mean(average) $17.28 Adams County 12.5% Median $14.16 Boulder County $52,000 Experienced $21 64 Boulder County 11.3% Larimer County $37.024 Larimer County 13.1% Colorado $43,680Weld Labor Force Commuting out of Weld to Work Colorado 13.0% (2006 est) 75,574(31.8%) Northern/Upstate Colorado Labor Availability Report(October 2007) _..,.. - - Labor Shed Boundaries—30-mile radius from 1-25 and Hwy.34 ,. ..1', vr- . ... . ,, ...: Report Findings: 1: P...,._011:ulatiAct$9x,80 8lvifan t`a for torte of 383,900 4 24,800 uoderemployad"inters4ted in changing jobs 2. 45 900 ava(table wofker8 t r rt$w or sexp4nd?ng,businessea) 5 ‘5,3013,140,9i*:emptoyed nor selatong empioyrnenf might re-enter worktoroe for right job m.., '. ;gar'*.4:. ; 481 EMPLOYMENT AND WAGES Employment Average Wages' 2007 Labor Foree!` + Weld County by Sector 2006 2007 °'0 Change 2006 2007 %Change Employment +i All Industries 80,555 83,355 3.48% $33,748 $35,984 6.63% >:'`'Weld Co Labor Force - 1 '#`� t 8057 . Private 67,642 70,115 3.66% $34,216 $36,608 6.99°0 Employed 1",3,544,.,,,,_ Agriculture,Forestry,Fishing and Hunting 3.741 3,955 5.72% $26,988 $27,612 2.31% Unemployed 5,513 "si;: Mining 2,187 2,927 33.84% $52,832 $57,148 8.17% - Unemployment Rate 4.63°4,: E;?° `' Utilities 237 250 5.49% $63,700 $74,412 16.82% . Adams County "__ Construction 8,002 8,008 0.07% $38,012 $39,364 3.56% Labor Force 220,316''' Manufacturing 10,018 10,047 0.29% $44,720 $44,928 0.47% Employed 2096091' Wholesale Trade 3,597 3,694 2.70% $49,608 $64,896 30.82% Una byad • 10 706 Retail Trade 8,138 8,486 4.28°! $24,388 $25,740 5.54% Unemployment Rate 4.8s°�:t_:: Transportation and Warehousing 1,681 1,790 6.48% $37,076 $39,000 5.19% Boulder County Information 1,131 1,180 4.33% $40,768 $59.592 46.17% Labor Force 178535.:p, Finance and Insurance 3,809 3,764 -1.18% $40,040 $41,548 3.77% Li„mpled 171,94T?=i i Unemployed .. 6 58& Real Estate and Rental and Leasing 1,043 1,094 4.89% $29,952 $31,824 6.25% Unemployment Rate 359% Professional and Technical Services 2,118 2,239 5.71% $45,916 $49,348 7.47% Lad mar Couotyr Management of Companies and Enterprises 992 1,049 5.75% $72,384 $75,140 3.81% Lat:or Force 175 757.;;: : Administrative and Waste Services 4,486 4,933 9.96°0 $22,464 $23,660 5.32°0 Employed 189.092 iV. Educational Services 271 292 7.75% $21,112 $21,008 -0.49% Unemployed ' 6,665 -NU: Health Care and Social Assistance 7,218 7,407 2.62% $35,828 $36,504 1.89% Unemployment Rate 3-791✓4=3_ ; Arts,Entertainment,and Recreation 839 814 -2.98% $12,948 $13,000 0.40% Colorado Accommodation and Food Services 6,162 6.322 2.60% $11,024 $11.908 8.02% Labor Force 2,717,261;,so:; Other Services 1,787 1,857 3.92% $23,504 $24.648 4.87% Employed 2,590,88t al Government 13,093 13,240 1.12°.' $31,460 $32.864 4.46% Unemployed 117 261. •'Based on 2nd Quarter Averages Unemployment Rate 4 3Z°fa:..Aiii; Fastest Growing Industry Sectors in Weld by Fastest Growing Industry Sectors in Weld by I 1 Employment(2006-2007)(from above sector info) Wages(2006-2007)(from above sector info) gg r G F. #, Transportation/ Mining Warehouse Wit, Utilities s Educational Services i 6 Admin and Wholesale Trade i Waste Services .,r f Mining a 9 Information r.• J' x} av o..! .. Am'W.Fx' .t-aai..•ch'g"ex. i 0` itY.t 2U, 1.Y;, 40„> 20`0 30% 40% 93.a K-12 EDUCATION 2006 2007 °i+, 2007 Percent Enrollment Enrollment Change Graduation Graduation RE-1 Gilcrest 1,868 1.804 -3.43% 110 83.3 RE-1J St.Vrain Valley 5,942 6,383 7.42% 78.2 (Dacono,Erie,Mead Firestone.Frederick) RE-2 Eaton 1,708 1,748 2.34% 87 82.9 RE-3J Keenesburg 2,088 2,105 0.81% 106 75.2 RE-4 Windsor 3,689 ... . • 3,868 .. .:•. ,4.85% .. :.. 166 . 83.4 s:.. RE-5J Johnstown-Milliken . • • 2,757 ••:•:•• 2,900 5.19%' - 106 • 79.1 .. Dist.6 Greeley/Uvans ;[18.069 18,401 1.84% :: 1 019` •71.4.!:::•! RE-7 Platte Valley(Kersey) ' 1,145 1,126 -1.66% 76 :91 6 RE-8 Fort Lupton • 0-E 2,506 ,;-2,433 "- -2.91% .'r; 144 75 4 RE-9 Ault-Highland °'' 853 = 832 2.46°`0 53- . t 75 7 RE-10 Briggsdale 145 " 142 -207% 15.,.ii RI b 882 g:itf. RE 11 Prahie 150 166 10.07% . 4 80.0 ::i; RE-12 Pawnee 109 1Q3 , 12.84% 10 76,9,-... • -.V TOTAL 41029t , 42 2.44%. 1896 $O 111''''''''.'' 'NotAvetable , ,A .- ,4, s Allpublic school data from Colorado (y?; ': F .i Lfilr1Et14EtEta+ ta t:;l;l.Ei . L>9partm�fit(3f Education We Ile +Ei+4S l E+ilit i itif' .4N'iid F4ii�9 Private Schools 2006 Graduation �' l r r f.ca"" '` ..7' 't :F:; :`' Adventist.Chrlatian School 2 7 , tiayripral� School Greeley 300 -,1'£,u;};!F,:€ tit High School Graduate or Higher t^ r Mountain, adem •Greele ' 87 ti,, x' x4 y Y y ,n" Weld CO Greeley Shepherd of Fiitts Lutheran School-Greeley 43 #+ °' St.Mary's Catholic School-Greeley 203 .,.rxi 79.6% 79.3°0 ,,a 1'5 i,i i! Atr:i 4F Trinity Lutheran School-Greeley 128 r E l :':' .y.f.ipbK,a'er ESPre s „: E•:.;:,." Pr.vale School - n i .....,:�:._......._.,..::. oc ti L�F ati it Ic from i _ ..r r :a;:;,:F;,,;.'N�r:1xE;y1�. ,,��,•:',� .:�'t . a ab tip!co orodo�ducahonbu n1' w..=, ,, _ i;i:,::v1'::';+i 482 HIGHER EDUCATION University of Northern Colorado—www.unco.edu Weld County is privileged to have within easy commuter distance five major universities: Year EnrollmentLocated in Greeley,UNC offers a comprehensive array of baccalaureate programs and master's and doctoral degrees. Colorado State University Fort Collins 2006-07 20.922 www.colostale.edu University of Colorado-Boulder Boulder 2006-07 28.942 www.colorado.edu Fall 2007 Headcount: 11,509(9,917 FTE) University of Colorado-Denver Denver 2007-08 21,658 www.cudenver.edu Denver University Denver 2007-08 10.713 www.du.edu Aims Community College—www.aims.edu Colorado School of Mines Golden 2006-07 3,975 www.mines.edu all totals include undergraduate degree and advanced degree students With campuses in Greeley,Ft.Lupton and Loveland,Aims is one of the largest comprehensive community colleges in Some College Associate Bachelors Degree Colorado with over 1,500 day and evening courses offered. Degree or Higher or Higher Fall 2007 Headcount: 4,585(1,295 FTE) Weld CO Greeley Weld CO Greeley 52.89e 56.6% 21.6% 26.4% RETAIL FINANCEJINCENTIVES Taxable Retail Sales (in millions) Enterprise Zone 2005 2006 2007 Weld County has a state-designated enterprise zone in twenty Weld $2,195.45 $2,285.27 $2,494.81 municipalities,including Greeley,offering state tax credits for businesses %Change 6-42% 6.78% locating or expanding within the zone. Greeley $1,120.83 $1,134.89 $1,162.49 %Change 1.25% 2.43% Weld/Larimer Revolving Loan Fund "Gap"financing for industry projects that create new jobs in rural areas of Shopping Centers Weld or Larimer counties. Greeley Mall—located on U.S.34 Bypass. Major anchors include:Cinemark 12,JC Penney and Sears with 70 shops, Greeley Community Development Fund services and restaurants. In addition,strategically-placed Loan program designed for small businesses in Greeley that are neighborhood retail centers throughout the county make marginally qualified for direct bank or SBA financing. local shopping convenient. • • Government Incentives .:COMMUNITY SERVICES. Based on adopted incentive policies and/or on a case-by-case basis, municipalities will consider providing incentives to qualifying companies Number of Hotels/Mote's: 28-1,262 rooms including;partial waivers of development fees.sales/use tax and/or personal property taxes. Bed&Breakfasts: 8-43 rooms Newspapers: The Greeley Tribune,ciro.28,000 AGRICULTURE Weeklies serve many of the smaller Weld communities. Radio Stations: AM FM Weld County is an agricultural empire of 2.5 million acres of which 75'b KJMP 870- KUNC 91.5+ ij , ;?: is devoted to farming and raising livestock.Weld County ranks 5th in KJJD 1170 KKOZ 94.3 the nation and 1st state-wide in the value of agricultural products sold. , ,KFKA 1310 KSME 96.1 ei • • • The bulk of the county's agriculture economy revolves around livestock `„ 1 it Xl-fNC 1360 KUAD 99.1 production. KGRE 1450 K 104.7 County g4 102.5 KELS Weld Agricultural Statistics* Healthcare: North Colorado Medical Center-Regional Hospital 1992 1997 2002 Licensed beds 398 Total farms 2,909 2,959 3,121 Pop.Service Area 382,000k, rr ?..•y.. • • Farms with sales of$100,000+ 773 702 540 {l,:a iii. .i • Physicians 330 10th r • Total farm production expenses($000) 1,054,982 1,002,474 1.086,020 Market value of ag products sold($000) 1,180.067 1;286,636 1,127,854 Recreation: Over 35 parks throughout the county Total cropland(in acres) 927.746 882,260 878,101 5 pubtieor private golf courses • Harvested cropland(in acres) 558,312 547,532 422.385 Within a day's drive to;2 national parks,9 national forests, Irrigated land(in acres) 407,293 393,030 326,494 over 2,000 trout lakes,and numerous ski areas. 'Ag census conducted every live years.2007 census not yet completed. Major Events: • ' . January .Colorado Farm Show ° •,:.. . April UNC Jazz Festival LiJCATION May Gino de Mayo Festival/Semana Latina Land Area Elevation 4,658 Feet Late June-July 4 • Greeley independence Stampede Weld 3,992 sq.mi. Latitude 40.25`North July WelArts County Farr of Greeley 27.58 sq.mi. Longitude 104.37"West July Arts Picnic :::: August High Plains Chautauqua September Greeley Potato Day CLIMATE September Greetey Fiesta '_: .... September Fort Lupton Trapper Days Yearly Averages—Greeley Cultural: Union Colony Civic Auditorium,Greeley Precipitation 13.74" Average Temperatures: 1,700 seat performing arts facility and home to the Greeley Snowfall 33.7" April 631-I 36L Philharmonic Orchestra and Greetey Chorale Days Sunshine 340 July 89H 59L UNC Performing Arts Series October 66H 37L '` December 41H 17L 483 UTILITIES TRANSPORTATION Electricity Distance From Greeley To Selected Cities Xcel Energy United Power,Inc. For rate information call: For rate information call: City Miles 2006 Population Est. (800)481-4700 (800)468-8809 Loveland 19 58.867 Serving Greeley and parts of Serving parts of southern Weld County. Weld County. Fort Collins 29 127.658 Poudre Valley REA Estes Park 45 5,707 For rate information call: Boulder 50 97,467 (800)432-1012 Denver 50 568,913 Serving parts of western and northern Weld County. Cheyenne,WY 50 55,362 Gas Atmos Energy Xcel Energy For rate information call: For rate information call: (888)442-1313 (800)481-4700 Seattle Minneapolis ;t, Water/Sewer Several area water systems serve northern Colorado.Considerable ,, ' 7;,. '- foresight by leaders in the county in purchasing water has ensured an $ . i New adequate water supply not only during drought,but to accommodate c York considerable population and industrial growth.Sewer services are w-,:,,� , � City municipally provided in most areas of the county. ' TAXES Las '.-**-=.10.7‘;,,.. � �"''� ,Atlanta Angeles - Orlando Phoenix Retail Sales Tax "• F Miami State of Colorado(excluding food) 2.9% Albuquerque -, Houston `` Weld County None i`n City of Greeley(including food) 3.46% Local Municipalities-varies 2%-4% State Corporate&Personal Income Tax 4.63%of Federal Taxable Income Air Freight Freight Ground Inventories,Goods in Transit and Intangibles are not taxed in Colorado Travel By By Miles and there is no Franchise Tax. City/State Time Rail Truck (From (From Denver) (Hours) (Days) (Days) Denver) Property Taxes Industrial/commercial property(buildings,land and equipment)is Albuquerque 1 2 2 437 assessed at 29%of market value(based on a variety of factors).The Atlanta 2 5 7 1,430 state does not levy a property tax;however,counties throughout the Chicago 2 2 3 1.021 state do.In Weld County there are 188 tax districts that overlap in a Houston 2 3 3 1.034 way that creates over 2,200 different tax areas and therefore mill levies Kansas City 11/4 2 2 606 range from approximately 60.000 mills to 148.000 mills.The mill levy represents the dollars levied for each 51,000 of assessed value.For Los Angeles 2 3 4 1,031 example,with a mill levy of 95.000 mills,the property owner would pay Minneapolis 11/2 3 3 917 $95.00 for every$1,000 in assessed value. New York City 3 1/4 5 8 1.794 Orlando 2 3/4 5 8 1.805 Phoenix 11/2 3 3 813 HOUSING Seattle 21/4 3 4 1,341 Washington.D.C. 3 5 8 1,620 2007 Home Sales by Region Median Weld Area #Sold Sales Price .. Air International Airport: GREELEY(CENTR3L c y 1,?34 $1£1 0.,,; : Denver International Airport A' ki04- LPIR-IPt s a'•::0 Distance from Greeley: 50 miles "a' 4 i ..�.�V 1 3 _ stir i� { i T Nil' , iiiiig - r,4 - � ? General Aviation Airports ll<t # ' - p r sa 4 ; - Greeley Weld County Airport ii i „-�' t Erie Airport F y .4,-,,,,..-,..,-..,,:: "'' �ti,,,�' .r at• Fort Collins-Loveland Airport 7. iii 4, ,i ,r Fg eep 1g Rail .t , 4 3 a„-"''P.' .-J t 1 tr1 c `` q Freight:Union Pacific,Burlington Northern Santa Fe,and 1 } i�+• ,tg Great Western Railway of Colorado(OmniTRAX). G4w� T `., 1O.6% . .t1% _ ; Truck 15 motor freight companies service Weld County. 484 WELD C�UNTVS 'GESTEM DYERS --.7* it r- '.z j t 'it"'a� Jobs Location * 0 s ry -'- - � F - 3650 Greeley r ayN F gar 7 ;gloct 2700 Greeley r s rs3 r@` mr ghlit } �'- a` cif `""_' 2307 Greeley/Evans °h €-I-%'cif{ - d. t 1- r a e'S -a'2'V:14 s' e' . W-Id's ₹>•W34 s rl 1`, t i s 4 .r.ai :f : ,.5l + - 1490 Weld U" a s- • a• '`Saa.- ...k :A iq 1400 Weld $? It 1 a°' .., �r u =,4tx r A6il'k;5s 1322 Greeley I+" x a:.: Y� : L ° ,I 1306 Greeley { y Ir ry,�a - g:U .�. 1159 Greeley z,i �/ k - 906 Greeley r :a � k1rt�{ `F flr,rr`iT .,{� m 856 Weld i -rL S 800 Windsor fCQdNk 3. c v Tr_ , 750 Windsor Ve:rn4d a ,§ .f e r gax 650 Windsor Aifl7$° }'z Y, + 7a 745 Greeley/Ft.Lupton 'xrr ' u Le. ,w v aiP""F `a'` 636 Greeley YtF .v $x.-. E xdt rik ! SCENlbf _ +:1 nr: t taig ate#'�.n ,'r1 i r 4 615 Windsor Ha100..„RI .--- l4t4 r ✓ ,W1r"8yg177-::". es 550 Milliken Metes 3 : - 537 Longmont 'ali •t- " . u*sy,a'f�r'#Spa e 3S t�v.`p a p'_vii"iv, .. 494 Weld d- � 410, 4N00 fn3dsrde assistance 410 Evans v1all W r T5 k ftr. c. -1 a• s i 'vii r ,, „r; 369 0 Ft.Lupton �� y e °: ,r,;',:,;,:,. Greeley F� s�:s,'! T.a,r i i;.AiattUcllen. 350 Longmont ShcIdnl.0d Tv,ilia-, pafwarf 334 Keenesburg 'gd11�G 'IT', =ie "'+cf L, fr 320 Gilcrest Bone@ -k r:r T vt3�c����m r!'A et -' 315 Greeley �. ,B,'L34 '� y..y lee d n-if-h' z e>4 �salel I yr } 305 Johnstown w '! #+1 yf r.r pr '"�G v 284 Multiple odflJ�.t,r ,, "w t u 'I a kr_ a r N _terrine l:. } '" t'k 248 Greeley � . -�;.lif r-;q, r_,r.z,r-�a J?.y. n. 240 Greeley „� y ry,k , t 6{poe•x� 240 Ft Lupton Um -,a s, m, s,.,� .a.,.-ri . yv �ri uc.;11Qt rodUcts and seed 227 Greeley 9C754}ri �ra 4.. 1rd ;cywl¢alggt�,. y a�}._@ r: 219 Eaton HUO rsJr r' - .loge 210 Greeley E:Ijt 2 Gi tH -S`": ii" VNi to 3 " +'j N ,,.a � rt: ° 210 Windsor �r ,,'��J. �yr. �s', �„RiOS�PAtl [dfR 204 Ft Lupton sy( �.nr >, s1 .�1 ,#ddaes r 200 Ft.Lupton 1kIL 'is} aA * > lti - 200 Milliken .,,, r s' i' !ar r`°ER44 �;r' ' t> s_ ' 200 Kersey Nobte >rT r''i. s 193 Greeley ,a r i �' : . _ t MJ*tri,. ,. 190 Ft.Lupton �✓# s may,+ L', k T - 190 Longmont d f A 2 '�` r t� �. t erc r. i stso9nts,cawenrencestores 189 Eaton � �" + qY 4�' -kd. Qf :affd'$1C -;:, „Cltenicet assembly 188 Longmont H,,_00-0A,,,, xytE° r � �F1'4�Sindpipessvlsizranceclaims 188 Greeley 7dt$et13�GFaJ$LL } F -!t Fr.. 183 Greeley Go .4-W AE¢i i ,„ K= pry ,,� ({ p r-- 170 Ft Lupton hlQmeI Tas 11 166 Greeley =4�e{.3f9a •7F1''-4)1 REIY3 r'° ..,: + .rrr �r'� yra r 161 Greeley Unwar rs � elis$Ot,ete.): 160 Windsor kmn y s E ' t v 3 148 Platteville 3e i e: er ar- • "" " " ' ' k !fr I°rr " 111114 44 Ault WeifaFai r+"i ss~ '' °e' :a 1 ,rs g ''Tr '^�r ° r> ',`, Kc'. n 3" ,:<,, r n .2 144 Evans Kmad�, �f iwpL r' " - 141 Multiple FekacY ,.,_ ykTh₹firxiei'4i* . .'" f s- . . 137 Greeley r I,A''rfi` '"x r°�4 airy 135 Greeley i`- -' 'S ik"" 3 M , r ? .6 'f underse ved 128 Ft Lupton 1 a -g!'rrx`5 , r " 127 Greeley ,4- .. ' rfrs- "ms - x[t l”se r fr s-1 a Y $idEi4d �g ,g ,usa �1p'31�t 120 Frederick r ,� �ti(}e¢�d¢' 120 Greeley • a 120 Greeley Cehla ° - r - � � 119 Weld County 485 WELD COUNTY (3,992 Square Miles) h. .;+,J, 1 j Yl y :4 4 +... t '�. } e 7: t ;i,y5 k 'dirt.!• 1ct� �.r-.fi"+L�,h,L j- f Y `�F e ` 4 �. r�-ri-��Eir�� tx el �P � r°1 trt `S i'l ' im}k fJt :##c...,;':#44:••4'441i`r4 ,o-,i'��.� Vi '4j 'I',dY'# .Ili},f.".` x 4.7" s.? .4 _.';)kA.,""44 "44'..5q1';•4:"`fir '..5 p , '4'''' - '' *" t4 '!+'4 tct rc. tC` tzSh M -?7*...eft x ` Y d� t Ii':'J3 i i''by r i s'•o.+,v� t r y .1.Ss. r 1 4 a}t �. yr Teiia fi 4'., 1,>t,k:a'+ f"` .7 ,t 5; ti� tp'z�'t� Sc� �FY ci''�' 3R' .i-et`.44 A t r 4: 4 i ` `•s 1 Fla 3^�q 5 i t r't - t`n lid c� F� �`._f�Cs�-4'�. S1f r 1�� s.'-�`�bf- �,'�'K�t,� �yt�y4>$�i 6' y .-f fr ..tU; { iti4r3.t,�` �#Y+� 3�+1j x{,`4,42 417 ;-44,1 6! t 7 "�`tE0,??.. 'S}:T -R4s,•R 't Fi ,,,I` < '{ N !t +}.` >>�.rf¢[, 'b' r.r� } F � a r�.,Fr'Y �S^ 5t7,10„..1„.:-).,, :'nt}f .. �" N#� i 1 t i7t •b y 6 ? y.'�1. } 5 ) q" k i 4 t-z .e e i r i e r si' n a '�`-1 >s .11 .'" ,it s z 1 't x` .,ki #' ! `1 t N tit 4, �ic0 '[ t R f. ,{. 1'3. i F .;•,-.4'' ,,l ik-i -,.£H�.'c:s,, {soh. iW �42,..1...,,,,,,..,.. ,•:, ',C .t,.w kt ..''a l' kpa,F z }f -;;;''.4'.:t'',;'U7 ar'.'44'i.t ,tt E tii",,F i i. t i f +i.-r' i. ,•-•.,-,s 'tAt t , }' { „7 f t# : : V t I' t I r ,M 4t.",`fl• li`4'b I > '* 4:;;,...,;...-i, A. L.rt r r o `9, dt { - I 1 ! ` � h i t >< < f i t t �f h�I 3" .+c4� 1 ��i , F� ! }'c t a�oz3 y Y i FwN`i'4 i; %'''-.:'..-C, L�{rE; mot, r s ;1;'. ,Lt4,�� i i*'t 't:-"7:'t�'r,alt'.}' }' ; t'fir n(3 ii ifs . 3'�I4 tie a r F ti I } ` • r r rd r ci W a ..?{19t ` x ' t$t y t ! .`1 i > 1 • .rt�'x}' k.f i . 1t ,t- :.t;k"t tt'E .T,....ii,,,-;:;',, .en.• 'i»$' 1° I If +t .. �1 i�. 4 4 h. F-4t., 4, , • y.. -,, a .f i 1 F. ?J v t •':,••=!•f••==.1.1-4-,',.- =),. 1+L r„.:-..., "i t,,'y�,?igl ° i - It&.� +`e L-i ' 3�, r c r rt`.r r e " 1 f , ft#j, 7 1, f a a-- .,Fff -' r� -4, ' . h,'`Y 4'.',,• 5el--1N-fi;: ,, ht . i .,'2 "i .t` i n t< ..css.., r '', 1.t. im 44--41 -' • ,.'1,-4,.,:,:-,,,.`tF' t'� , t >� 1) -+ .,...Li.,.,,:....,! -.,,,,,:,,,,,,,,,,,a!`3,:: } k7.-..',7 ;,i, 2 a�R � s i i 1 t:� 1�4 i h 7-t i�� �-n'i., Ay f #t, a If . ', BNSF=Burlington Northern and Santa Fe D�'R 1 l GWR=Great Western Railway 9a F UP= Union Pacific :wsxx !1T GPIj t z , :f. I', , { r s u L'! &4 v=74,1,.t..,,,,,:••,,,,,a`r'31� it ' •, '� `''''iii f ' 4l 1 {`Ef �`tt` �, s >` y�r ,, '�F:� +, � I' -fla . rr♦ l ' ,,,,,i..- -'t- ,i..,,„4•,,,,',-,‘:::,--"P".,,,,,",:".,',::‘,`Jyz W-r t }-t'7' f3NSF f7. . GWR /�� �r- *t T .,r'z, i Jy�,:3 4t., L'*riot q -�` - S Gy4 , S , h 25; Ne t t s k a r w �a 80 C YENNE a .'�i `� .a.>l1TM.%i.x.y,?.,Z .eI;-+"d°�t' 'F, a� . q" 80 ! / g- , ' art 52' y r .• WYOMING Z OLORADO Up OC •we 25 i - 3 ;85; • FORT COLL For Information Contact: ;34� + GREELEY A � A .11.'"...-.., LOVELAND 34 r 34C LONGMONT '85 176*' A19��; W .00"UPSTATECOLORADO BOULDER Denver ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT . _Denver Airport IMO A 70 ) 822 7th Street,Suite 550 DENVER Greeley,CO 80631 (970)356-4565 or Toll Free(800)320-8578 A(970)352-2436 Fax ,25 www.upstatecolorado.org info@upstatecolorado.org COPYRiGHT POLICY:Each issue of the Weld County Demographic Profile is copyrighted by Upstate Colorado Economic Development.Re-printing or otherwise reproducing an entire Profile is expressly prohibited unless written permission is obtained from upstate.Citing specific data or tables is permitted provided appropriate credit is given to Upstate. Sources of Information: City of Greeley,Weld County,Colorado Department of Labor and Employment—Labor Market Information,Colorado Department of Revenue,Colorado Division of Local Government,Greeley Mall,Greeley Convention&Visitors Bureau,MLS Statistics,North Colorado Medical Center,UNC Department of Economics,U.S.Census Bureau,Weld County Public Trustee. Publication paid for in part by the City of Greeley. 486 2 < .5 . | � �i l �`iiiii| ; . • 2 I■ ]m I 1:91e117 � �k � ] I . a � q �� ! ! � / I f , � � $ | • •, � i \}� Ii : .x •m | ' I w I. 2 O • ,! A a. . I • ,r . & I , m � • ,q | | - j § � § , $ . o i ! ^ |_ /,00= C -0 I •| A . ® — • = ? | I ) ■ I• © 1 ; $ - 04 N m /\ . I . § ;w . CA 04 AEa I j k. en ] : s |� � ! 2 I 4p4N . | 1 � « � ] ' ■ ]� �, i 1......k..o � ] O 1\ _ 0 � « . � ' n ) P 1 Q r ! . } � : � : ] • ! ■ • , } ,1111.14' ' J. } 1 I ! - 1G � ) I ; ! i r . ■ , � � ! j }V m : �l I ? . �« ;� ` - i ! 4 ) . { . • .1� \ ( i , ) i] i i -. IA14i i . : , I ° CI / \ \ 0 • 0 f o 8 E S S a o i e, / § O a 3 = 8 1� i § , S W R Q ! 17 }2 , _ O .,JA-. 1 ... Q 487 4 o 'I'I o \ I e , o \ •;\ ii 0 T. iR a l0 1v o N I^ ' m ll -n ^ Io0 IN q. , + O F� I,e A A e ,,e e 1 e 1. C i t� r410. : -- 'IO I l: V I Z. O I enM Nl en I Vl _ I o. I I I I I I I '' " 1 — p 1 al 1 S -'—,r , ti4 0, I, dal Its IN V I ao A'1". 'm 'N IF 1 co (n N N ;In; I N . 4 inillaSSIIIIII9 91?E ICIP N I en jiO I h It` W I pY vb. 1cn In• IIt+1• N N IN ✓ x8 •IIIMMEMISI i O II e a:.°',,, e I\ \ \ it\' 1 •0 . Ill r• ti • a �cn OO I ti- NG i�N 4� J.� i4 ,,N; �,. F l h I 4 0 a VIII A I A jj g Imo. • • kle v elv v $vly � I p l .- W T l0 CD r {°ill° N � 9" l � l� r V "a 4 CI ll . ininiiiim= F •` -a-. g g CO rla ' 901 ! G1 4 6 I O �CO i •N N �- 10 II O U 1 W y 'Ie \ \° , \ \ \ I' . .rq $g• �^ t 9 t` I W M 'el 1 GI. 4 c en 'I N 1/4O 1/40 IIMIS .vu •Om A Q7 t 7 i. N6J y 1 1 I ICI N Qi u.....f.�r�r Al p le '; \ fie\° '' \ \ \ �\ I �' -24 coil i M 1 00 iI O •I . , . In. illniailli IS 1 I:4 41 . W 1 , ''t` I' 1 d4. Elie .\ \ �, \ , \ ;e X 14 i Rl W II V m I N l0 O Acn - f"� A l0 M O� N I en L� M t F I ` '—_1 l e K j ' 351 I V d ! 6 Hi V • Eii ® [ ;I F H l g ,!cy 8 II W [(('� R `' U U '- C re,t F I F" m 'U E 1 i 1 m ; N W (A R .- O ti 4 \ \ e e •o e \ e GL O 'O •�• T y w 4)4 15 O o O O o O 0 o 0 0 o O iy O a co F l0 in V n Cl y 47 � I 3 I W' m samxanag piano yuaaxad m d too,w s g lU ; m 1m ix i d +U lk t � R 488 0 0 0 0 0 69 0 0 'Clo 0 0 V .-. N T. fA fA EH m P. O O V co O y in -. a .- M .- A o F ,O o 0 O R ,o O , o i O I ,1 • ' v' 0 : "Zr ;! .9 p1� {' EA ke a 1 # 010 l01ol d O 0 { 0 01 a 1a wile ja 4' ,4! e a C � i, ill. w ila i� al IN .. 1 9 1 1 0 .1 0 1 0 7 0 I yt a. O O ] O I . O J b N In N i. Mt---. � n � ta „,n 01, : I 4V 71...d 06 Ni " ; a oo enr- a s rn C �� I I y ' f9 ,I 1 i a C 1 .6. _,_ . 0 oho oJo y m sc0 a Py o 0 O1O N N I 1 W i 0 i .. �I V 1 Oi 11 ,Cyr `� 4O. �'11,1:1,1r `. ga. � LL co iD ! v l co W I 6 W n1 .- IN I Q ® 1 v a. "1 1 0 0 O I o co F. W 4 y o 0 1 0 0 ; Cd I 'l anti 7, � n j� � 1� I Li O 0 of a ‘O li O. 7 N ' 1/40101 Q r Q l O 6 0, 69 1 Vi l V1 w .1.,'-', ' 0. Q 3 iii �I o yy o o j I c 9, M F _ at a. o1o � o o !as Pi Pi a� I . .N-. .I 009 ij 9 a 03 � j I T.rqt Ij 10 ri0 : o Io ■1 r;141 ro 1o1] ogo � 0 e °E,:.-;'' oi � o • • C a o 11 F n 1 a `to o0 Q. .1 N a W Il 169 ,: C ii . o Jo .lo itl O o ! o O O O O O O O O O 1 E M ^ n I h ,o O O O 0 0 O O O j1 O , 1 O'• O 1 r O O O O 0 0 0 0 n d J c a1 N II N I N o O 0 0 O a 0 69 f O O 0 0 O O O 1 a 69 aH ,I I O O O O 0 0 O I .,. O O O O 0 0 O .a..: T.� in0 ON O met O 6i9 . ! a a a N9 a 69 7 a 6 SI[aOQ , ! G1 O F N - y I K F ., v '4 C, y e, 0 P d W It ce 'a e) v o P.°—. ce a al 489 ------ ' t ` Oo• :h :,N Jt W ' O ct (kV N N 0 krt 3' � � : p 3 1tl • oo b N IN a I It) '444 v44 l ilk:. N (v IV. p u. .0 I -M; H O M c N NI N1 ro - I o, IM to I� C ▪�I y } ( N Y C N co V �i � - y Y .vl N T 00 CI 0 e +z' 2 ,Oo i N IO 'M I• O t ,O 1 N 'h ,O, ��ti ° :GA V) IE "W, o. I I l a 1 , �° o 'er I � IC co h e b i ' C,I .Ol 1, ,-„, ,o ,h rcaC�x d "Ni ,O1 I to f9 )�17 V I I I ti , • r ^ u eNI a n� � A 10 'D t M I el fry • Y � . '• � 'r',,,, gp, N I W 1 vs 1• � t bs ,I ES L 1 I I g O 4 '',1,-St, '. V : 55m 'coco h 'I. 1 o VD ,I J 4� I N ,O 'O rk COI - y ' a. IQj� VJ 'Vl }V, - W I d I Vl N to N . O O N O hm 4 s ; : ; N i r-: i nk kkt CA k` Ali FA V, E ol O ti • V Itli a d 6 N OO M • 0. , W ICNA IY, ,Y, » W O ..f; : m L ! I Ion �I"gil 1 � a t 1 IN , N O, h 'L'" n Nn Q '' 6N9 FAI E9 H N H ‘4V i I 6 .�., ro a `u F I -I U I m 0 0 "u 0 ai _ . 2 O O O O O 0 O O X 4. m cn 4. 0 0 0 o O O o O m m a ' ® o o 0 0 o 0 0 F V G w eyideD zed amxanag a u m sa:0 .Ch Q U 490 - a 4 I i I a . v ; i W y ' m y Cl b E ^ ' a O p. O i. M O CO nN �r to y i E ,, W Y z j , ' cl 1 O M :. w o -' R �j iri i U S 0➢!N , V a = 'Os"I: w dl, a ; 9 O pa OIM ca al I. O 9 N C I et M Q U PIam,4444, p . N 9 y , 0 w a I r w C t ! .. . C O O O O Di O V1 O O O O N In M N Cl ...33AOpdUia ad su 2[D U 491 Ell I 3 i I ' 4 1 1 I C d N N^ r- O I � lco , e I i I I a7 ! I I co olooIa _ 7 N 1 O en N N I I I1 L l m o I OM -� C o a 1 rn Al O 1N ir �N rnr p I W n 4 et 4 ^ ' rnIr � jN al= 1/ o V .. ,44i , W it =,ia w • bmio 00 ,, ,r rn GM X CJ N el- g o4 ,, - m y ; 01 V pt 12 I e d m N I a l ' O 1 V ' N 5� 7 ■ ) L Ch.; N 1 6J� , Nf 1 L I a I I la ' a .sFj aN I C.e en 0% o ^ 0 1 6 I s , ! Ili 4 Iits 5Esc.)o N O GO!l ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ..-- Oo T O N N m o o� O Cd N O O '. an eA Passassy amend.Jo luaatad 492
Hello