HomeMy WebLinkAbout820058.tiff RESOLUTION
RE: APPROVAL OF THE SITE APPLICATIONS CONCERNING THE MEAD SANITATION
DISTRICT AND THE MILLIKEN SANITATION DISTRICT
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County,
Colorado, pursuant to Colorado statute and the Weld County Home
Rule Charter, is vested with the authority of administering the
affairs of Weld County, Colorado, and
WHEREAS, applications for site approval for improvements to
the existing facilities of the Mead Sanitation District and the
Milliken Sanitation District have been presented to the Board of
County Commissioners, and
WHEREAS, said improvements are to upgrade existing treatment
facilities to remain in compliance with the current State Discharge
Standards, and
WHEREAS, the Board has studied the proposed improvements and
deems it advisable to approve the site applications for the Mead
Sanitation District and the Milliken Sanitation District.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commis-
sioners that the site applications concerning improvements to the
existing facilities of the Mead Sanitation District and the Milliken
Sanitation District be, and hereby is, approved.
The above and foregoing resolution was, on motion duly made and
seconded, adopted by the following vote on the 10th day of February,
A.D. , 1982.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
WELD COUNTY, COLORADO
ABSENT DATE SIGNED
John T. Martin, Chairman
ATTEST: ` *�.. ursa,,g,, a tsti^�a+ ����,a
� f '
C c Carlson, Pro Tem
County Clerk and Recorder
and Clerk to the Board /J n
By." �� Norman Carlson
--u-u./(t
Deputy Coun y Clerkj
•
APPROV AS TO FORM: ll �> fib^
C W Kirrby
C)
County Attorney
e K. Ste' ar
PL0079 820058
DATE PRESENTED: February 17, 1982
•
RESOLUTION OF THE WELD COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
Moved by Jerry Kiefer that the following resolution be introduced for
passage by the Weld County Planning Commission:
Re it therefore Resolved by the Weld County Planning Commission that the following
be adopted:
Requests from the Mead Sanitation District and the Milliken Sanitation District to
upgrade existing treatment facilities to remain in compliance with the current State
Discharge Standards.
Weld County Planning Commission Chairman, Jerry Kiefer, be given authorization to sign
the application forms on the no comment line of both applications, meaning that
we have taken no position and thereby see no problem.
Motion seconded by Bob Halleran
VOTE: For Passage Abstain
Against
Jerry Kiefer
Wilbur Wafel
Bob 3alleran
Bob Ehrlich
Jack Holman
Bill Diehl
Fred Otis
•
The Chairman declared the motion passed and ordered that a certified copy of this
Resolution be placed in the file of this case for further proceedings.
CERTIFICATION OF COPY
I, Bobbie Good Recording Secretary of the Weld County Planning
Commission, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing Resolution is a true copy
of the Resolution of the Planning Commission of Weld County, Colorado adopted on
February 2, 1982 , and recorded in Book No. VIII of the proceedings
of the said Planning Commission.
Dated the 3rd day of February , 1982
Secretary
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING CER , ___
PHONE (303)3564000 EX 4L4
91510TH 5 -__
GREELEY,COLORADO 80631
uJanu,p a
ary 28, 1982
� �
COLORADO
Mr. J. L. Walter
Hogan and Olhausen, Inc.
2300 West Eisenhower Blvd.
Loveland, Colorado 80537
Re: Mead and Milliken Sanitation Districts request for modifications to
treat facilities.
Dear Mr. Walter:
This correspondence is to advise you that the Department of Planning
Services staff has reveiwed the proposals and finds that the intended
modifications are not expansions, but rather, are necessary upgrades to
keep the facilities in compliance with State Health requirements. As
a result, no Use by Special Review will be required for the modifications.
The Mead request was reviewed by our office during 1980. This review
included a proposed division of a treatment cell as well as addition
of aeration and chlorination equipment which is the specific request at
hand. At that review, our office indicated the proposed improvements
do not require a use permit.
The Milliken facility will be provided with an emergency sludge reaeration
basin which does not effectively increase the hydraulic or organic loading.
As indicated above, this modification provides for compliance with State
Health Standards and is considered to be a maintenance improvement.
As mentioned in earlier conversations, the site applications will be
presented to the Planning Commission and Board of County Commissioners
for action so that you may continue to move toward the Water Quality
Control Commission decision. It would be desirous for you to attend
these meeting to provide background for these two bodies.
If you have further comments please fe free to co tace me.
Very tr1unln y s,
UM
Thomas E. Honn
Zoning Administrator
HOGAN & OLHAU. , INC.
2300 West Eisenhower Boulevard
Loveland, Colorado LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
80537
Date Job No. ZZtl-1 - it- i
(303) 667-6286 1 - ZZ -4 72.2-I - - l
I Attention
TO F,c< -A 04- (Adel co,,......\-- _ 1 I
CU�Vv\\SaI D�\� ✓ S RE: S I.(.e A_pt l «�t�-C�5
yis i 0 — S-c- c_. ` A
GENTLEMEN:
WE ARE SENDING YOU $C Attached ❑ Under separate cover via
the following items: ❑ Preliminary Drawings 0 Prints ❑ Plans ❑ Samples
❑ Specifications ❑ Final Drawings ❑ Copy of Letter ❑ Change Order ❑ Other
COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION /
Mav-m-4- r s 5,,��1/6,..a_c.f s i
j S i Le_ P( e-.--t 51. _ + r O4: e-<=-C- L. L
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below:
❑ For approval ❑ No exceptions taken ❑ Resubmit _ copies for review
-For your use ❑ Make corrections noted ❑ Submit copies for
distrTbUtion
ElAs requested
ElAmend and resubmit s
❑ For review and comment ❑ ❑ Return corrected prints
❑ FOR BIDS DUE 19 PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US
REMARKS ( aa S.z e-0. ( ( ( f a.„-t-- a.-Li 3 �..w S •^ S
I - ii ,z-
COPY TO
rrilciriLITT- Pwiti '2)11 i±1?li\pcD E--•°/ SIGNED:
I JAN 25 1982 I; , ST71-3
.._ . ;Li 4/19/79
Vii-m Py pl,n"'nv ^mn'c inn _. ..
HOGAN & OLHAUsLN, INC.
2300 West Eisenhower Boulevard
Loveland, Colorado LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
80537
Date Job No.
(303) 667-6286
I — 12.-- g z. -z, z 17— I —
1 Attention
TO o06_1/4,4e-r tAS,e,L� nn
Coin Cm tin AA ot Sctiex-S
RE: � � Ia � P � ��a �� � s —
e..1 a rrald Q� ,L.YC.,M c,S+rk L-�—
S Co Cs::3
GENTLEMEN: ��
WE ARE SENDING YOU 1� Attached ❑ Under separate cover via
the following items: ❑ Preliminary Drawings ❑ Prints 0 Plans ❑ Samples
❑ Specifications ❑ Final Drawings ❑ Copy of Letter ❑ Change Order ❑ Other
COPIES DATE NO. II DESCRIPTION
Site pp
za`kz c� (MA
S (�z app -- M eo.._jk
S-1-v- .c4---
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below:
❑ For approval 0 No exceptions taken 0 Resubmit copies for review
❑ For your use O Make corrections noted ❑ Submit copies for
r-] Asrequested 0 Amend and resubmit s distri u�tion
For review and comment ❑ ❑ Return corrected prints
❑ FOR BIDS DUE 19 PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US
REMARKS
Pr _
l JAN 18 1982
Li( -
Weld Co. Planning Commission
COPY TO
SIGNED:
ST71-3
4/19/79
,r,OLOREDO DEPARTMENT' OF HEALTH
;Water•Quality Control Division
421U East 11th Avenue
Denver, Colorado 80220
APPLICATION FOR SITE APPROVAL OF CONSTRUCTION OR EXPANSION OF:
A SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT AND
B) LIFT STATIONS HAVING OVER 20,000 GPD CAPACITY _
APPLICANT: Milliken Sanitation District
PHONE:
ADDRESS: P.O. Box 290, Milliken Colorado 80543 _ _
Consulting Engineer's Name and Address: Ho an and O1haUsen Inc. 629-7124 (Metro'
2300 West Eisenhower Blvd. , Loveland, Colorado 80537
PHONE: 667-6
A. Information regarding new sewage treatment plant:
1 . Briefly describe on a separate sheet of paper the reason for locating the sewage
treatment plant on this particular site. This should include, but is not
necessarily limited to, a description of the present and possible development
of the site location and service area. (Adding to existing plant)
2. Size and type of treatment facility proposed:
Type Activated Sludge __
Present PE
GPD: 400,000 PE design 1300 to be served 450__
(gal/day) capacity
$ Domestic:
100% % Industrial : None —
3. Location of facility:
Attach a map of the area which includes the following:ing lift Exhibits
xhi bins A and B
(a) 10-mile radius : all sewage treatment p
s(b) 5-mile radius: domestic water supply intakes.
(c) 1-mile radius: habitable buildings , location of potable water wells , and
an approximate indication of the topography.
Big Thompson River —
4. Effluent will be discharged: Watercourse
Subsurface disposal :
Land: —
Other:
Evaporation:
State water quality classification of receiving watercourse(s) :
5. Will a State or Federal grant be sought to finance any portion Residential
project? yPc Commercial
6. What is the present zoning for the proposed service area? Industrial —
Present zoning of site area? Agrigulture
Zoning within a 1-mile radius of site? Agriculture Residential Commercial ,_1➢�11str
WQ-3(rev. 1-78-40)
- 1 -
r
7. What is the distance downstream from the discharge to the nearest domestic water
supply intake? None within 10 miles
(name and address of supply)
What is the distance downstream from the discharge to the nearest other point
of diversion Evans Town Ditch. 3700 Golden, Fvans. Colorado R0620 _
(name and address of user
3 miles - not used for domestic purposes
8. Who has the responsibility for operating the facility? Milliken Sanitation District
9. Who owns the land upon which the facility will be constructed?
Milliken Sanitation District
Please attach copies of the document creating authority in the applicant to
construct the proposed facility.
10. Estimated project cost: $132,000.00
Who is financially responsible for the construction and operation of the
facility? Milliken Sanitation District
11 . Names and addresses of all water and sanitation districts within 5 miles downstream
of proposed wastewater treatment facility site.
Central Weld County Water District Little Thompson Water District
105 18th Street 307 Welch Avenue
Greeley, Colorado 80631 Berthoud, Colorado 80513
(Attach a separate sheet of paper if necessary. )
12. Is the facility in a 100 year flood plain? NO - near edge
If so, what precautions are being taken? Existing and proposed aeration basin is
approximately nine (9) feet higher than edge of flood plain.
Has the flood plain been designated by the Colorado Water Conservation Board,
Department of Natural Resources?
If so, what is that designation?
13. Please include all additional factors that might help the Water Quality Control
Commission make an informed decision on your application for site approval .
Service and Feasibility Study of Sewerage Improvements for Milliken Sanitation
District, plus supplements 1 , 2 and 3 to the above study previously submitted to
WQCC. Letter approving Treatment Facility Improvements plans and specifications
by WQCC has been issued.
•
WQ-3(rev. 1-78-40) - 2 -
t
'!
B. information regarding lift stations : Not Applicable
1 . The proposed lift station when fully developed will generate the following
additional load:
Population Equivalent
Peak Hydraulic (MGD) to be served:
2. Is the site located in a 1001year flood plain?
If yes, on a separate sheet of paper describe the protective measures to be taken.
3. Where will the overflow be discharged?
4. Name and address of facility providing treatment:
5. The proposed lift station when fully developed will increase the loading of the
facility to 9, of hydraulic and p of organic capacity.
C. If the facility will be located on or adjacent to a site that is owned or managed by
a Federal or State acency, send the agency a copy of this application.
D. Recommendation of governmental authorities:
Please address the following issues in your recommendation decision. Are the proposed
facilities consistent with the comprehensive planning for the area and with other plans
including the 201 , 208, 209 and 303(e) plans? If you have any further comments or
questions, please call 388-6111 , Extension 378.
Recommend Recommend No
Date Approval Disapproval Comment Signature of Representative
Locl Government" (Cities or Towns, if inside
municipal boundary or within 3 miles, and
Sewer District)
Board of County Commissioners
Local Health Authority
City/County Planning Authority
Regional Planning Agency
Council of Government
State Geologist
/ Date: ;7 !� fY L 11(,�
Signa.pre of Applicant
District Engineer Action:
Recommend Approval : Recommend Disapproval : •
Date:
Signature
WQ-3(rev. 1/78-40) - 7 -
i
\
\ -tifstations : Not Applicable
\\\,,./ used lift station when fully developed will generate the following
-tonal load:
Population Equivalent
Peak Hydraulic (MGD) to be served: _
' 2. Is the site located in a 100 year flood plain? _
If yes, on a separate sheet of paper describe the protective measures to be taken.
3. Where will the overflow be discharged?
4. Name and address of facility providing treatment:
5. The proposed lift station when fully developed will increase the loading of the
facility to % of hydraulic and % of organic capacity.
C. If the facility will be located on or adjacent to a site that is owned or managed bt
a Federal or State agency, send the agency a copy of this application.
D. Recommendation of governmental authorities:
Please address the following issues in your recommendation decision. Are the proposed
facilities consistent with the comprehensive planning for the area and with other plans
including the 201 , 208, 209 and 303(e) plans? If you have any further comments or
questions, please call 388-6111 , Extension 378.
Recommend Recommend No
Date Approval Disapproval Comment Signature of Representative
Local Government (Cities or Towns, if inside
municipal boundary or within 3 miles , and
Sew Di trict
g-71' -,r 1. Yes'-!/isri •
-
Board of County Commissioners
/ Local Healt A hority
2
/County Planning Authority
Regional Planning Agency
Council of Government
State Geologist
Date: L`Ci� �. /T 6 erniee-f-•-t -
Stgnat5ure of Applicant
District Engineer Action:
Recommend Approval : Recommend Disapproval :
Date:
Signature
WQ-3(rev. 1/78-40) .. - 3 -
" ; (... . ( •
, •
- t • k-
r
}
• .. "
3
-.
'' l lift stations: Clone/Not Applicable
r f y generate the following
\���/ _s�� Ilft station when full developed will• _�
/"i load: population Equivalent
' � MG D) to be served:
itell ydraul is
Om site located in a 100 year flood plaint
1^' is es, on a separate sheet of paper describe the protective measures to be taken.
If Y , . .
3. where will the overflow be discharged? _
y, Name and address of facility providing treatment:
_ 5. The proposed lift station when fully developed will increase the loading of organic loadingaof the
facility to _____% of hydraulic and e
C. If the facili ill be located on
ad'acent to of site
sthatlit s owned or mana ed b
a Feder State bec send the r
D. Recommendation of overnmental authorites: ro osed
Please address the following issues in your recoommendag tionor idedecision.
Arettthe
e[prrposeds
facilitiesincluding
consistent 20 with the comprehensive
lans?p If you have any further comments or
including the 201 , 208, 209 and 303(e) P
questions, please call 388-6111 , Extension 378.
Recommend Recommend No Si not e of Re resentative Mead Sanitation
Date Approval Disapproval Comment
-71,-- District
F-71-Y, Government Cities or Towns, if inside
municipal boundary or within 3 miles, and
. Se District)
and of County Commissioners
• Local H h AuthA
7/,/ YG - y/County anning/ Authority
�7�� Regional Planning Agency
Council of Government
State Geologist
that signs have been posted in accordance with regulations entitled "Procedural
I certify li +'o for Sewage Treatment Wore l„, ��� -
Regulations for Site App y �� � .,"`-
Date: / 2 — � ti Signature of Applicant
District Engineer Action: -
i Recommend Approval :
Recommend Disapproval :
i
Date: Signature
WQ-3( ev. 11711-40)t .
- 3 -
Y/ 1 J/ 17
J
rr n / �r • Sj4Z]
r SCE6 LF,. ° I`.. . cc, • •� N• �Z -2_ ,cCP
: _ e -l ;e •
I =; r — , e° - ,°. s
• >,
•,;y. 3' .g.1••.o�a: ',.' •e ° cil ...D •. 1
_ I° of [vlcnu�cE aorr (\, °f crGr: : ��
i }lJ�' �n /(1 !Ilptll�� tJl r° x)y,� . �7: °• ' � Por• �• C 1 '•
A.
( \
[. •�C'�a^rl —/ °�e ' •M.° ze°!t� •°• 1''•J. ,\t\� °. ° '%•• 1 ° ou •\.
`` 9 • }1F .. ° ° •uctl ° i r ° • ° e i° • \u •1° z �°: : — r'M1l% o o ]° '••"- ^^ l A� @ P ..
° •mzUpne°!• 6 °� • 6 °p�]�,-�Nerr •I °': ° " ° •L , /f//��
' xD 0.r .icea. GPE .1 ;� Hill_� r p° `Jok
e • 'n. 17 ( ra I . ••,v ' .rf - � z <4 422, �. ,A . zi f1 E 1��_ z � .
w CSOfi >r EE Uyr. —
I �G�� 'V 1 os, LTIy,� • DI 7 20 e• I� • ' , e•[ 4 ✓D r, s'1 4 �•�'�. ,G=' r^—. � t� :')�.�
:• a. 3 ¢ . �y ° ( • ' /r' 'BL S ] L\0ilLL-\`\•: , •--2 '• �/ , 0 -.it-- 11
�F • ° .�� •
p F �v �FF ® °I
ya
1. vb.C�1S'1! 4se h b e.° �. � 1 -II" 'B 4P> I .. Ixm . 1��
i fah o' _ D ' 11 0 0 E, f�
^wy1. Y•"Te• .• O 1 0 ''mac ix • o '��`- °i tor I 1 I z..rt' C: rae •°�'•jjel.�
\bv • Camp 1Ckfflc '
__oY . i] r. 21' I. I ?p •
,I •
• •° , • 29 n/ , r: 1
I • • I %�
' 1 > • I `IC 1 6 o 1 so T•P ' e • 26 { �� • I3
y ° c,ee,PY a. _ CI �r I••
a & c` ' P �I
F s1 q .
'Correction' ' _ Llne ,% 61
• � � S1EFN � •
' `I .es •Lts;?ct •�/' • !a.-. \ i1eT DMI UN IN U , I I° `LIFIC•
•�J[ ••a V F er• 's .-L'�, MILL?' 4.3 I • 0 \ J1 °I
.S \' •
• '• _�2�• JO • O •
i�lr° 'pI ' 11 : 01e6° I° •��_aI•. C• _ 4H l • • •:•--•r • -- o _—•— � o i° �__-- --n . T ^J1
mGaD" b 1uS ..r° o • 1
S De,.• i yo f ;^• n 1'.l (
et 4113
' • • •°• •• ., •` .• - �Q` I • ia6 •. • .y • • °. lti . —sG.
!Cp@I •• -- I M>eroz I .! c I Pcc...J ��JJ o Ozr;"— L.
,a•, /
6 n xl iF •
zx Mond 24 I., x � '•\"de •�• ti za x. •u° • ' z y ,
`;• fps• .eo •• .I _• ----- _ 6 . I>-. F—�' "7 -----• • •--- Ia. ,
I�c 4/•
o
.
b1 • °°u x• I •n • --_I •,• ^ 6• a •' e• xrz • . n • re I n u z• $
•
• .. •� •
• ° + as •� ]• �,. I �� a a~ Ii .___
• '1 O • J.•Vl O (' II
11 `.
C+° •
6• - __ .• I h r-1k—• I.. . z/�:uste••• 1° , I pe°� i•.� .q . , b T 1• II
c • ; •♦ •c • 1c1, 'I1 ,_'I I/ 3 •
\
r , I I n w r
k IM •• 1)
" p •I• •> k aI ----n o u I. I, . pI
: 1 I. .�' ••`z � zaI P �ITEVIu[ �\ xl • I• II
• - .C
x II n COr• n to
!� ✓
x _ L'r" .�. . I i. 4z : IM� earr {)..• ( -1• I •I ..y..
..:,p . .• / 11 - 13-- 4-0, kk
t 7 c t5 . IF ° I =• I •LijtS I' 4— >p rr an
ru., I II 1 . -`Qh r .- ,,„ - Itt::____/\ .
•I Sit �. . _;F' ►• \.L' lt . I/ I pa v • 33 ' 7 :: ja p v v az 1 ' 'I.
J Il • �.1�� �� U a� . T I - Lao e f rew1n.ern-
��� U;.,c,0_2. 4Y) L
��,. _ A 1
1 �g/ tFairrieu',Schw1—�' '-•�534 .�� O�-1J� R.i 0.Y, t ��'y�-p� �� / _
___:\:..li,,,,,\,k,,,,,
2)5:IiLl---1.-',-, i'l 0\N'ir'N\ ._____ ) ) ‘.1 f, ) 34i \, 4BB ��� / \\:\%`\s ;)) 36 )�1) ` -0 41ees , � �i3 ,1 �;
7J ••`111 (/
-1)- -. \_Nl:_1(7 IA Cl (1/4 \\ J., e (,, , \lr'r
2 l i, 11 �iI-'' �J ice— ' li ' / ��,y \) 1� o
,. SN -�� ` imp % I. .�� ,X , i �� j�.
D \
�� - -7 - �1���4735 /� \ / _� "i
c 1 f ��
L47.4 `., 2 rt° Vn v 300 rtpo '�LJiA� - 4]5^,�.
•
�m �/ 257 \ "r' �_ � _ "4ana; RE--0 \\
-ki_y_
3 /
— __\ 1 ¢;met/ �L�\Z e• v. T
4 r
N �4
Flume °� X 1 E. 1
r -_T 17"7 4738 °
V\ r
�f _ Well
20' -RC,'
qV \ HallsbC(U� c\----
: 26Ilo
LCC(C ESTER;�' ,]3Bp PSS \ /:I �—� 111-H74.3):1°."
o
eDan1/ � Au �� .''i4]46 Ate-, —�Ircrr "t P.Sch
.� -- x'4764
l -'n�. �. I. . u . 4]A6� 4z3z �4/,
r Milliken 60
/ o GOB — '-�v .4751 ��
O30 7
12
1 \A 1 raU\\•
/
/J V I V 4 n 4] 4761 a •
- 18742 7,... (n /
L08
J
4.04,c,
A
��
0 \ r 4
o m°ay
\ ___ re,d).-:9,4) . i 0 O r 0 o enf iriN4 / \ ‘.
i t
: I / j -`.�N@,CL ' O Li, c t- I I 1. I �</'117-\'',...,P._-:-=
t3 i o l `\ \ t Vl.I A-%l it W1
- �'\ .'485). � `—`--- .4 � .�_ l�� �I - :�%
, /5"? t.-
..______ / ,
- 1--K---- '(-1--------N \---
i : ......__
Fr
,) ,_______,c,,,,o ) ) 2-2_1s ..
5-2
tit I
r22 /' —,/J���'JJ 2 „rte°/ [ ti--72V2,' / - :\24 . :47)
' Y
i i��° j Ir r r.-.. )AILL• %ir C' f' o
giLJP c.0'
:� —�- _ �.
�A °2 I Q /
r. coz
o - i e 21
COL-ORA®0 DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
Richard D. Lamm -04;;_c_---'�%q Hvr` of
Frank A.Traylor, M-D.
Governor 18 76 Executive Director
1 ii„ , 1.-
December 10, 1981
N\''.. DEC 141981
Mr. Reginald Wakeman, President .
Milliken Sanitation District •
P.O. Box 290
Milliken, Colorado 80543
Dear Mr. Wakeman:
This office has reviewed the plans and specifications of the improvements
/ for the Milliken Sewage Treatment Plant and no variances from our criteria
were found. One stamped copy of the plans and specifications is enclosed.
If you have any questions, please contact this office at (303) 320-8333,
extension 3740.
Sincerely,
/ , L9
,,Jegnzari
(vie-Or Sa'inz
Public Health Engineer
Municipal Facilities Section
Water Quality Control Division
VHS:ljd
Enclosure •
cc: Gary Cooper, Hogan and Olhausen✓
Sam Cooper, D.E. - CDH
d91l1 FACT 11T1-1 A \'r=Atr IF IlPIJ\/FP fl ll 1186 f1(l R(199(1 PI-I(1MIP (3(121 29fl-F1222
January 21 , 1982
Project No. 2212-01-12-01
SITE APPLICATION NARRATIVE
Milliken Sanitation District owns and operates and existing Wastewater
Treatment Plant and Collection System. A Service and Feasibility Study
was prepared, including supplements which addressed the areas of infor-
mation required, including service area, population projections, existing
taps, land use and zoning, description of existing facilities, alternatives
and proposed long term improvements, cost estimates, financial , and
conclusions and recommendations for a projected treatment plant design
which would have increased the hydraulic and organic loading capacity
beyond the existing plant's capabilities. However, due to the lack of
funding, the District has authorized as an interim solution, the addi-
tion of an emergency sludge holding re-aeration basin immediately adjacent
to the existing basin at the plant. This improvement is not intended to
increase hydraulic or organic loading.
The three basic functions of the new basin will be :
1 ) In the normal operational mode, this basin would serve
as an emergency sludge holding re-aeration basin. The
additional sludge storage capacity will improve upon
existing treatment efficiencies by re-aerating the sludge
removed from the existing settling tank and by permitting
lower solids concentrations in the existing aeration basin.
Also, the additional sludge storage capacity will aid plant
operations during the wet months, when it is not possible to
discharge the sludge slurries onto the fields.
2) Auxiliary (backup) aeration basin, to function when the
existing aeration basin is not operable, because of
maintenance and/or other problems.
3) Lastly, the basin would be designed to function as a
clarifier, if an oxidation ditch is added in the future.
We note that the proposed basin would be large enough to
serve in this capacity and also that the existing aeration
basin could be used as a digester.
Attached is an excerpt from the Service and Feasibility Study addressing
the service area, location, population projections, existing taps,
and land use and zoning.
Site Application Narrative
Project No. 2212-01-12-01
January 21 , 1982
Page 2
The relationship between this plant and those surrounding it are shown
in Exhibit A of the Site Application submittal as to location. The
feasibility of joining with the Johnstown system has been addressed and
discounted by the Service and Feasibility Report and supplements thereto.
Raw and effluent wastewater flow and quality characteristics to and from
the plant will not vary significantly from that being reported under the
existing NPDES Discharge Permit now in effect for this plant with the
exception that the improvement will allow for the meeting of those
required standards on a more consistent basis.
This project is the result of an analysis of the existing facilities.
Although this project is an interim solution, it will allow the District
to meet existing discharge standards until funding otherwise can be
obtained or otherwise acquired. The replacement of lines per this
project is to gain greater depth in an area causing maintenance and
service problems. Infiltration that may be existing in these lines will
be eliminated by the replacement.
The existing plant is located near the 100 year flood plain elevation.
The walls of the aeration basins are elevated approximately nine (9)
feet higher than the elevation at the edge of the flood plain.
Several alternates have been reviewed as part of the long range planning
process for treating waste in this service area as part of the Service
and Feasibility Study. However, this project is an interim project
which has been designed to become a part of an overall long range system,
but does not lend itself to other more expensive alternatives at this
time.
Attached is a legal description of the site on which the existing plant
and proposed facilities are located. This land was purchased and is
owned by the Town of Milliken.
The Milliken Sanitation District has an established Board of Directors
which administrates the management of the wastewater system in this
service area. A full time licensed operator is used to operate the
plant and provide maintenance on the system as required.
The Board has established tap fee rates and monthly service rates which
are in effect. As of November 16, 1981 , the monthly service rate was
increased from $8.00 to $10.75 to help finance this project.
Site Application Narrative
Project No. 2212-01-12-01
January 21 , 1982
Page 3
Attached is a time schedule for the estimated construction time and
start up date.
No new land acquisitions or rights-of-way are required for this project.
•
SECTION I
GENERAL
A. PURPOSE
The purpose of this report is to provide sufficient general , tech-
nical , and financial information to evaluate the feasibility of
needed improvements to the Milliken Sanitation District's wastewater
collection system and treatment facility. In this report, the
problems associated with the existing system are discussed, along
with proposed improvements, estimated costs, and methods of financing.
The preparation of this report has been authorized by the Milliken
Sanitation District Board of Directors with the intent of submittal
to the Farmer' s Home Administration and the Colorado Water Quality
Control Division as partial fulfillment for funding applications.
An effort has been made throughout this report to address the re-
quirements of the 208 "Areawide Water Quality Management Plan,"
particularly as related to facilities and service planning under
Revision #16.
B. SERVICE AREA
The area currently served by the sanitation district is primarily
within the Milliken town limits. Milliken is located in Sections 2
and 11 , Township 4 North, Range 67 West, Weld County, Colorado
which is approximately 40 miles North of Denver, Colorado and 6 miles
East of Interstate Highway 25 along State Highway 60. The confluence
of the Big Thompson and Little Thompson Rivers is located about 0.5
mile North of the center of Town. Exhibit I-A shows the location
of Milliken.
I - 1
SECTION I - GENERAL (Cont'd)
B. SERVICE AREA (cont'd)
The Union Pacific and Great Western Railroads pass through Milliken.
Terrain within the Town limits generally slopes from elevation 4765
in the Southwest part of Town to elevation 4740 in the Northeast
part. Previous soil boring logs indicate that the subsurface soil
is a silty sand or gravel with the watertable depth varying from
6 to 10 feet. The soil type and groundwater cause sewer construction
costs to be higher than average.
C. POPULATION AND EXISTING TAPS
The following table shows past and projected population figures for
the Town of Milliken:
Year Population Source
1970 702 U.S. Bureau of Census
1975 1 ,117 Local Planning Department
1980 1 ,500 LWRCOG "208 Plan"
1985 2,475 LWRCOG "208 Plan"
1990 3,100 LWRCOG "208 Plan"
1995 3,600 LWRCOG "208 Plan"
2000 4,000 LWRCOG "208 Plan"
It is not the intent of this report to make population projections,
but to evaluate the needs of the sewer system. The needs of the
existing sewer system can readily be evaluated based on the existing
population. In order to be cost effective, it is our feeling that
improvements which are constructed should be sized for some addi-
tional capacity than that required by the existing population.
Proposed improvements will not be as cost-effective as possible if
they need to be enlarged in a relatively short period of time. The
estimated current population is 1 ,300 people.
The District currently serves 382 taps which add up to about 443
equivalent taps and are broken down as follows:
I - 2
�
`\ •
TOWN OF
12 `��\ M/L-L/KEN, COLORADO
L==1 � ` ZO/✓/NC MAP
1
it
:\,
_ L\t. ' i N, ,____
•„,-_-_.,..__ , ,____ __ ___._._, !„,•_-__„--,_,_„________ , .._,• • , „„:
_.. . .
::,_ .. , ./...,
, \ •
.,, .., - ,---- --; ____.
, ._ _ . .., ___ ,--r_____)
I JL, hi IT - -EP i n
1. --- I L:` P 'Tithi h � k` i- `i3
_. ,
WWImrn
95a314.
uonücww
EXHIBIT I-B
• LEGEND
R-/ SINGLE FAMILY RES/DENT/AL
R-3 MULTI- FAMILY RES/DENT/AL
C-3 COMMERCIAL
I-/ LIGHT /NDUSTR/AL
7-2 HEAVY INDUSTRIAL
•
TIME SCHEDULE
FOR THE
MILLIKEN PLANT AND LINE IMPROVEMENTS
Project No. 2212-01-12-01
January 25 to February 12, 1982 Review of Site Application by Local Agengies
February 15 to February 19, 1982 State Review of Site Application
March 1 to March 5, 1982 Assembly and Printing of Drawings and
Specifications
March 3 to March 19, 1982 Advertise Project
March 22 to March 26, 1982 Open/Evaluate Bids
March 29 to April 2, 1982 Meet with Board, Issue Notice of Award
April 5 to April 9, 1982 Sign Agreement/Notice to Proceed
April 12, 1982 Begin Construction
75 Days
July 2, 1982 Completed Project
s Recorded a o'clock M. \.\
Reception No. , Recorder.
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, That ----BENJAL'IN KAIST.:n and
ELIZABETH KAISER
of the • County of Weld , and State of Colorado,
for the consideration of other valuable considerations and Ten Dollars,
in hand paid, hereby sell and convey to The, Town of Ilillihen
of the County of Weld , and State of Colorado,
the following real property, situate in the County of Weld
and State of Colorado, to-wit:
A parcel of land in the Northwest one-fourth of the Southeast one-
fourth (NW*Stl*) of Section 1 , Township 4 North, Range 67 West of the Sixth
Principal Meridian, Weld County, Colorado, being wore particularly
described as follows:
Commencing at the Southwest corner(SW Cor.) of said Section 1 and
considering the West line of said Section 1 to bear forth 00°00'00"
East with all bearings contained herein relative thereto:
Thence forth 00°00'00" East along said West line of Section 1, 1702.07feet;
Thence forth 90°00'00" East, 30.00 feet to the True Point of Beginning;
Thence forth 00°00'00" East , 208.71 feet;
Thence forth 90°00'00" East, 104.35 feet;
Thence Eouth 00°00'00" West, 203.71 feet;
Thence Couth 90°00'00" Vest, 104.35 feet to the True Point of Beginning.
The above described parcel of land contains one-half (s) acre.
with all its appurtenances, and warrant the title to the same, subject to
9
Signed and delivered this day of , A. D. 19 67.
In the presence of (SEAL)
(SEAL)
(SEAL)
STATE OF COLORADO, )
COUNTY OF WELD. )ss.
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of
19 67, by'' Benjamin Kaiser and Elizabeth Kaiser.
rt ` uCo — ' e Z “
. , • 1 t d -ice_-_.�,
COLORADO DEPAP r'ME:CMT OF HEALTH
.�H cir..� W Frank A.Traylor.M.D.
Go D.Lamm '� 1876
8 7 6 Executive Director
Governvernor
•
December 10, 1981 -id !
,\ DEC 1 41981
Mr. Reginald Wakeman, President
Milliken Sanitation District
P.O. Box 290
Milliken, Colorado 80543
Dear Mr. Wakeman:
This office has reviewed the plans and specifications of the improvements
for the Milliken Sewage Treatment Plant and no variances from our criteria
were found. One stamped copy of the plans and specifications is enclosed.
If you have any questions, please contact this office at (303) 320-8333,
extension 3740.
Sincerely,
( vict r sainz
Public Health Engineer
•
Municipal Facilities Section
Water Quality Control Division
VHS:ljd
Enclosure .
cc: Gary Cooper, Hogan and Olhausenv//
Sam Cooper, D.E. - CDH
4210 EAST 11TH AVENUE DENVER.COLORADO 80220 PHONE (303) 320-8333
SECTION I - GENERAL (Cont'd)
C. POPULATION AND EXISTING TAPS (cont'd)
Description Number Equivalent Taps (EAR)
School 2 22
6 Unit Apartment 1 6
23 Unit Apartment 1 28
Fourplex 1 4
Duplex 6 12
Mobile Homes 45 45
Single Family and Commercial 326 326
TOTALS 382 443
D. LAND USE AND ZONING
As shown on Exhibit I-B, generally speaking, the Southern half of
Milliken is zoned residential , the core of the Town is zoned com-
mercial , and the Northwest portion is industrial . Most of the land
zoned for industrial use is still used for farming. Farming is also
the predominant use of land adjoining the Town limits.
Exhibit I-C shows the areas surrounding Milliken that have been
designated by the Town Board as the 20 year service area. The
service area includes approximately 300 acres. It is assumed that
the service area will be used predominantly for residential growth
with some commercial growth adjacent to Highway 60. It appears that
ample industrial sites exist within the present zoned areas. No
estimate was made of the percentage of residential areas that would
be used for multiple family or single family dwellings. This will
depend on several factors and is beyond the scope of this report.
I - 3
cPc�E p )l85JJ� •
187
FORT COLLINS K MILL/KEN
l2-873
GREELEY
34 OM�Op RIVER / j So
7N - — 6� �I 0,.
els LOVELAND yPLATTE RIVER
� ✓OHNSTOW `B�
c-
THOMPSON R . ( ��
0 W/GG/NS FT. MC:RGAN
•
LONGMONTs ROGGEN
FT.LUPTON KEENESBURG
BOULDER HUDSON 2
25
DENVER,
40
25
V/C/N/TY MAP
APPROX. SCALE 14=15 MI.
EXH/BIT I-A
HOGAN & OLHAUStN, INC.
2300 West Eisenhower Boulevard
Loveland, Colorado LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
80537
Date Job No. 7.7..t1-1 - St- i
(303) 667-6286 I - it -%t- 7ZZ-I - " I
f ( 1I Attention
TO �co-,-A a-�- (JJetcl Coks_cA — RE: S 1L. F nn_ 1 t�tN s —
C
Ovv�v"\SSI ONeV`S P/ f
N�\\\. ,Ate..✓ . ScL T. ViS4,
Sts t(In+4 S �� � a.,- 1
S h�ic le. ( sn to Y-ct L ('V� a-0-A S`L L^ _ i S 4-.
goC>3t
GENTLEMEN:
WE ARE SENDING YOU Attached ❑ Under separate cover via
the following items: ❑ Preliminary Drawings ❑ Prints ❑ Plans ❑ Samples
0 Specifications ❑ Final Drawings ❑ Copy of Letter ❑ Change Order ❑ Other
COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION
\ I L / / 1J 4/2THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below:
❑ For approval 0 No exceptions taken 0 Resubmit _ copies for review
-For your use ❑ Make corrections noted ❑ Submit copies for
distr.-Ma-ion
ElAs requested C3Amend and resubmit s
❑ For review and comment ❑ ❑ Return corrected prints
❑ FOR BIDS DUE 19 PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US
REMARKS r( rZCLbz ( ( t `yam v I .im"-c-"t_ a-"t..1 3 t.A_ci S'�l ` S -
CJ �v a�
I— r2 ' Z-
COPY TO � ll
0) Hri- Gtr 4 \* SIGNED: J L V-`-a_
Ir' JAN 25 1982 ST71-3
L 4/19/79
'-'.F:OLORADO DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
Water Quality Control Division
42.1.9 East 11th Avenue
Denver, Colorado 80220
APPLICATION FOR SITE APPROVAL OF CONSTRUCTION OR EXPANSION OF:
A) SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT AND
B) LIFT STATIONS HAVING OVER 20,000 GPO CAPACITY
APPLICANT: Mead Sanitation District
ADDRESS:
Mead, Colorado 80452 PHONE: 535-4557
Consulting Engineer's Name and Address: Hogan and Olhausen, Inc. 629-7124 (Metro)
2300 West Eisenhower Blvd. Loveland, Colorado 80537
PHONE: 667-6286
A. Information regarding new sewage treatment plant:
1 . Briefly describe on a separate sheet of paper the reason for locating the sewage
treatment plant on this particular site. This should include, but is not
necessarily limited to, a description of the present and possible development
of the site location and service area.
2. Size and type of treatment facility proposed: Type Aerated Lagoon System
50,000** Present PE
GP D: 200,000* PE design 665**
(gal/day) capacity 2650* to be served 5qn
%Domestic:
100 $ Industrial : None
3. Location of facility:
Attach a map of the area which includes the following:
(a) 10-mile radius: all sewage treatment plants and lift stations.
(b) 5-mile radius: domestic water supply intakes.
(c) 1-mile radius: habitable buildings , location of potable water wells , and
an approximate indication of the topography.
4. Effluent will be discharged: An unnamed intermittent stream, about 21/2 miles to
(Watercourse) Lake Thomas.
Subsurface disposal : N/A Land: N/A
Evaporation: N/A Other: To watercourse
_ State water quality classification of receiving watercourse(s) : B-1
5. Will a State or Federal grant be sought to finance any portion of this
project? No Industrial , Agricultural ,
6. What is the present zoning for the proposed service area? Incorporated (Town of Mead)
Present zoning of site area? Agriculture
Zoning within a 1-mile radius of site? Same
*With future improvements
**With immediate proposed improvements
WQ-3(rev. 1-78-40) - 1 -
7. What is the distance downstream from the discharge to the nearest domestic water
supply intake? None within 7- Miles
(name and address of supply)
What is the distance downstream from the discharge to the nearest other point
of diversion 3 miles to small irrigation ditch diversion
(name and address of user)
8. Who has the responsibility for operating the facility? Mead Sanitation
District, Mead, Colorado
9• Who owns the land upon which the facility will be constructed? Mead
Sanitation District, Head Colorado
Please attach copies of the document creating authority in the applicant to
construct the proposed facility.
10. Estimated project cost: $30,000.00
Who is financially responsible for the construction and operation of the
facility? Mead Sanitation District
11 . Names and addresses of all water and sanitation districts within 5 miles downstream
of proposed wastewater treatment facility site.
Little Thompson Water District
307 Welch Avenue
Berthoud, Colorado 80513
(Attach a separate sheet of paper if necessary.)
12. Is the facility in a 100 year flood plain? No
If so, what precautions are being taken?
Has the flood plain been designated by the Colorado Water Conservation Board,
Department of Natural Resources?
If so, what is that designation?
13. Please include all additional factors that might help the Water Quality Control
Commission make an informed decision on your application for site approval .
Previous site applications approved by WQCC in August, 1975 and 1980. Preliminary
Engineering Report previously submitted and approved by WQCD and Division of Local
Governments in October, 1975. Proposed improvements to the District's existing
wastewater facilities will be within the land owned by the District. Future final
plans and Specifications for this system submitted and approved by WQCD. •
WQ-3(rev. 1-78-40) - 2 -
B. Information regarding lift stations: None/Not Applicable
1 . The proposed lift station when fully developed will generate the following
additional load:
Population Equivalent
Peak Hydraulic (MGD) to be served:
2. Is the site located in a 100'year flood plain?
If yes, on a separate sheet of paper describe the protective measures to be taken.
3. Where will the overflow be discharged?
4. Name and address of facility providing treatment:
5. The proposed lift station when fully developed will increase the loading of the
facility to % of hydraulic and % of organic capacity.
C. If the facility will be located on or adjacent to a site that is owned or managed by
a Federal or State agency, send the agency a copy of this application.
D. Recommendation of governmental authorities:
Please address the following issues in your recommendation decision. Are the proposed
facilities consistent with the comprehensive planning for the area and with other plans
including the 201 , 208, 209 and 303(e) plans? If you have any further comments or
questions, please call 388-6111 , Extension 378.
Recommend Recommend No
Date Approval Disapproval Comment Sign�ate Hof Representative
)? 71 r/ i�I�/�L1V Z L�� /� Mead Sanitation
>c K y -j�7�. District
Local Government (Cities or Towns, if inside
municipal boundary or within 3 miles, and
Sewer District)
Board of County Commissioners
Local Health Authority
City/County Planning Authority
Regional Planning Agency
Council of Government
State Geologist
I certify that signs have been posted in accordance with regulations entitled "Procedural
2 Regulationsy for Site Applicata6o Sewage Tv tme t
Date: /
Signature of Applicant
District Engineer Action:
Recommend Approval : Recommend Disapproval :
Date:
Signature
WQ-3(rev. 1/78-40) - 3 -
-�' i X ' /
/ ytc. 0 CP/ Y Q `. t\., c
/J •
N
.. \� f • i o m Q o 2
_ J _ > w DI/ `- / O W r/� w ` y __ O'er Y —y 3 2 C\ 00
. � -'
i
r� _
z o I - 2
v ____,,-
7-�... - \ \ oP. o \\-.
Nm o
23 C
•
Qom— L. co
W I p to
z r v F!_noS w -
uJ / ) W \ xi
1--
0-- J
- / 20- 0
Z
( / V .(!� N N
o `as `‘� 3`o" N `b \`0 O
J o f / 0. o \0 1 c
�2 O /y . c i.,.
s < j 7
( t 0_, yy o
-\ I , rC a O9 'III"
'... / ' d w o I O
�. -�) ,- = Z
�r\ c O Z
m
O
\ J
in
z / 6o W
io • 2��W v ' ti _J
h
f0R1 g� \e V L
W . K C ' �W _ VM '
K co Q EC h
aQN ¢ �' in O
a, O
,
8 8 I Q Q
< O k o; ' J; 2 0
'.5.D O i O ` J V
x. ¢ m\ 2 t
__ S Q O••J W �. I if)
m I . I -tc
F4' a -C Q
w ) V) O
lq
Q 3 ti
W ) 3
Z 0 4 /
, 9. ________—__"),_i----- - ----- ----N.-.___ ,\c. N____5—) ....c* - - ..--.----. - -y.�o
1.R
•
l D p „J
7 ---\ e9ao
;AS _WATER TR 4TmENT 2 1/2 MILES TO
rJ /Tr SITE sat LAKE THOMAS
✓A,E.40IT_:II
..,,_
. •
J S° I
S90
n. . _ `
4v I
� 1 JO
vh i 1
,yy ,
4" 0 -
_o
O , -JJ
MULLIGAN
RESERVOIR
ao
V/C/N/ %-Y MAP
SCALE= / - 20001
SITE APPLICATION for
__: - .MEAD-- -S- ANITATION DISTRICT
WELD COUNTY, COLORADO - .
REAPPLICATION FILE NO. 722-I-7- 4
FILE NO_ = 722 - / - 5 DATE = JAN 1982
DATE = JUNE, /9i 5
January 21 , 1982
Project No. 0722-01-08-01
SITE APPLICATION NARRATIVE
Mead Sanitation District owns and operates an existing Wastewater
Treatment Plant and Collection System which is being improved with this
project by the addition of aeration units and a chlorination system.
These improvements will provide an interim solution to an overall long
range plan for this plant. There are no changes to be made to the
physical layout of the existing lagoons at this time. The aeration
units and chlorination system are to be installed to help this plant
meet existing discharge standards. They will be installed so as to be
incorporated with the design of the long range improvements which have
been previously reviewed and approved. Site applications have been
previously approved for the overall long range plan but expired due to
the District not obtaining State funding as was anticipated.
The majority of the service area of the Mead Sanitation District is the
Town of Mead with small areas surrounding the Town being agricultural .
There are currently 120 taps on the system plus the school which has
approximately 720 students and staff.
Other high density developments or other communities are not located
within a reasonable distance to the service area to support consolida-
tion of treatment facilities within the area.
Raw and effluent wastewater flow and quality characteristics to and from
the plant will not vary significantly from that being reported under the
existing NPDES Discharge Permit now in effect for this plant, with the
exception that the improvements will allow for the meeting of those
required standards on a more consistent basis.
This project is the result of an analysis of the existing facilities.
Although this project is an interim solution, it will allow the District
to meet existing discharge standards until funding otherwise can be
obtained or otherwise acquired.
The existing plant is not located within a 100 year flood plain.
Alternative types of treatment facilities were considered and determined
economically unfeasible for the size and long range growth projected for
this area.
Site Application Narrative
Project No. 0722-01-08-01
January 21 , 1982
Page 2
Attached is a legal description of the property on which the existing
treatment plant is located. This property was purchased in 1964 by the
Mead Sanitation District.
The Mead Sanitation District has an established Board of Directors which
administrates the management of the wastewater system in this service
area. Testing and reporting required by the Discharge Permit is provided
through a contract with Hogan and Olhausen, Inc. , via Mr. Ted Vogel , a
licensed "A" Wastewater Operator. Maintenance is provided by an employee
of the Mead Sanitation District.
The Board has established tap fee rates and monthly service rates which
are in effect.
Attached is a time schedule for the estimated construction time and
start up date.
No new land acquisitions or rights-of-way are required for this project.
Ii,lili . I: ( 1
°o-. R r-r.1vr_n
• K�f4
O
•t_.e. SEP 24 1980
,!eie
COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
4210 EAST 11TH AVENUE • DENVER, COLORADO 80220 • PHONE 320-8333
Frank A. Traylor, Jr. , M. D. , Executive Director
September 23, 1980
Mead Sanitation District
Mead.
Colorado 80542
Re: Site Application No. 3406 for 105 ,000 gpd aerated lagoon system
Weld County
Gentlemen .•
We are pleased to inform you that the Colorado Water Quality Control
Commission approved your application at its meeting held on
September 2, 1980 . The following conditions are applicable:
This site approval will expire on September 2 , 1981 . If
the construction of the project has not commenced by that date,
you must reapply for a new site approval.
This approval does not relieve the owner from compliance with all county
regulations prior to construction nor from responsibility for proper
engineering, construction, and operation of the facility.
Very truly yours,
Roger H. Smades , P.E. , Chief
Field Services Section
Water Quality Control Division
RHS:dec
Weld County Health Dept.
_1100.2n_and Olhausen . Inc.
District ' ngineer
•
TIME SCHEDULE
FOR THE
MEAD PLANT IMPROVEMENTS
Project No. 0722-01-08-01
January 25 to February 12, 1982 Review of Site Application by Local Agencies
February 15 to February 19, 1982 State Review of Site Application
March 1 to March 5, 1982 Assembly and Printing of Drawings and
Specifications
March 3 to March 19, 1982 Advertise Project
March 22 to March 26, 1982 Open/Evaluate Bids
March 29 to April 2, 1982 Meet with Board, Issue Notice of Award
April 5 to April 9, 1982 Sign Agreement/Notice to Proceed
April 12, 1982 Begin Construction
60 Days
June 11 , 1982 Completed Project
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
FOR
MEAD SANITATION DISTRICT
Wastewater Treatment Plant Site
A tract of land, containing 5.007 acres more or less, situated in the
Southwest Quarter (SW 1/4) of Section Ten (10) in Township Three (3)
North, of Range 58 West of the 6th Principal Meridian, Weld County,
Colorado, described as follows :
Beginning at a point on the West line of the Southwest Quarter (SW 1/4)
of said Section Ten (10) from which point the Southwest corner of said
Section Ten (10) bears South 540 feet, thence North 89°15' East 964.1
feet to the true point of beginning; thence North 87°26' East 350 feet,
thence North 17°26' East 650 feet, thence South 87°26' West 350 feet,
thence South 17°26' West 445.24 feet, thence North 89°53' West 225.86
feet to the East line of Fairbairn Avenue in the Town of Mead, Colorado,
thence South along the East line of Fairbairn Avenue 20.0 feet, thence
South 89°53' East 219.66, thence South 17°26' West 183.81 feet to the
true point of beginning.
COLORA^) DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH WFLD MINTY COMMISS108ER�
Water Quality Control Division r _
421U East 11th Avenue
Denver, Colorado 80220
111 /
APPLICATION FOR SITE APPROVAL OF CONSTRUCTION OR EXPANSI9N-OF _�
A) SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT AND LiRFE:Ler. COLO. —'
B) LIFT STATIONS HAVING OVER 20,000 GPO CAPACITY
APPLICANT: Mead Sanitation District
ADDRESS: Mead, Colorado 80452 PHONE: 535-4557
Consulting Engineer's Name and Address: Hogan and 0lhausen, Inc.
629-7124 (Metro)
2300 West Eisenhower Blvd. Loveland, Colorado 80537 PHONE: 667-6286
A. Information regarding new sewage treatment plant:
1 . Briefly describe on a separate sheet of paper the reason for locating the sewage
treatment plant on this particular site. This should include, but is not
necessarily limited to, a description of the present and possible development
of the site location and service area.
2. Size and typeof treatment facility proposed:
*50,000 Type Aerated Lagoon System GPD: 200,000* PE design 665** Present PE
(gal/day) capacity 2650* to be served ri40
% Domestic: 100 % Industrial : None
3. Location of facility:
Attach a map of the area which includes the following:
(a) 10-mile radius: all sewage treatment plants and lift stations.
(b) 5-mile radius: domestic water supply intakes.
(c) 1-mile radius: habitable buildings, location of potable water wells , and
an approximate indication of the topography.
4. Effluent will be discharged: An unnamed intermittent stream, about 21/2 miles to
(Watercourse) Lake Thomas.
Subsurface disposal : N/A Land: N/A
Evaporation: N/A Other: To watercourse
State water quality classification of receiving watercourse(s) : 8-1
5. Will a State or Federal grant be sought to finance any portion of this
project? No
Industrial , Agricultural ,
6. What is the present zoning for the proposed service area? Incorporated (Town of Mead)
Present zoning of site area? Agriculture
Zoning within a 1-mile radius of site? Same
*With future improvements
**With immediate proposed improvements
WQ-3(rev. 1-78-40) - 1 -
7. What is the distance downstream from the discharge to the nearest domestic water
supply intake? None within 7-miles
(name and address of supply)
What is the distance downstream from the discharge to the nearest other point
of diversion 3 miles to small irrigation ditch diversion
(name and address of user)
8. Who has the responsibility for operating the facility? Mead Sanitation
District, Mead, Colorado
9. Who owns the land upon which the facility will be constructed? Mead
Sanitation District, Mead Colorado
Please attach copies of the document creating authority in the applicant to
construct the proposed facility.
10. Estimated project cost: $30,000.00
Who is financially responsible for the construction and operation of the
facility? Mead Sanitation District
11 . Names and addresses of all water and sanitation districts within 5 miles downstream
of proposed wastewater treatment facility site.
Little Thompson Water District
307 Welch Avenue
•
Berthoud, Colorado 80513
(Attach a separate sheet of paper if necessary.)
12. Is the facility in a 100 year flood plain? No
If so, what precautions are being taken?
Has the flood plain been designated by the Colorado Water Conservation Board,
Department of Natural Resources?
If so, what is that designation?
13. Please include all additional factors that might help the Water Quality Control
Commission make an informed decision on your application for site approval .
Previous site applications approved by WQCC in August, 1975 and 1980. Preliminary
Engineering Report previously submitted and approved by WQCD and Division of Local
Governments in October, 1975. Proposed improvements to the District's existing
wastewater facilities will be within the land owned by the District. Future final
Plans and Specifications for this system submitted and approved by WQCD.
WQ-3(rev. 1-78-40) - 2 -
B. Information regarding lift stations: None/Not Applicable
1 . The proposed lift station when fully developed will generate the following
additional load:
Population Equivalent
Peak Hydraulic (MD) to be served:
2. Is the site located in a 100.year flood plain?
If yes, on a separate sheet of paper describe the protective measures to be taken.
3. Where will the overflow be discharged?
4. Name and address of facility providing treatment:
5. The proposed lift station when fully developed will increase the loading of the
facility to % of hydraulic and % of organic capacity.
C. If the facility will be located on or adjacent to a site that is owned or managed by
a Federal or State agency, send the agency a copy of this application.
D. Recommendation of governmental authorities:
Please address the following issues in your recommendation decision. Are the proposed
facilities consistent with the comprehensive planning for the area and with other plans
including the 201 , 208, 209 and 303(e) plans? If you have any further comments or
questions, please call 388-6111 , Extension 378.
Recommend Recommend No
Date Approval Disapproval Comment Signal e
Hof Representative
x'?_zS,yi � G � T f 4/1 Mead Sanitation
X. O 7 . ¢G t-c...-%zza District
Local Government (Cities or Towns, if inside
municipal boundary or within 3 miles , and
S wer) District) 7
Bad/4��� ✓ d of County/Commissioners-24 Local }Health Autt bi i ty
-t'ty/Count a ing Authority
Re Tonal Plan in12 Agency .—'
Council of-Governnient \\
State Geologist
7 I certify that signs have been posted in accordance with regulations entitled "Procedural
Date: 13 Regulations for Site Appl iWo�g5�o Sewage T �tmept Works"
Signature of Applicant LC !
District Engineer Action:
Recommend Approval : Recommend Disapproval : •
Date:
Signature
WQ-3(rev. 1/78-40) - 3 -
8. information regarding lift stations : None/Not Applicable
1 . The proposed lift station when fully developed will generate the following
additional load:
Population Equivalent
Peak Hydraulic (MGD) to be served:
2. Is the site located in a 100 year flood plain?
If yes, on a separate sheet of paper describe the protective measures to be taken.
3. Where will the overflow be discharged?
- 3
4. Name and address of facility providing treatment:
5. The proposed lift station when fully developed will increase the loading of the
facility to % of hydraulic and % of organic capacity.
C. If the facility will be located on or adjacent to a site that is owned or managed by
a Federal or State agency, send the agency a copy of this application.
D. Recommendation of governmental authorities:
Please address the following issues in your recommendation decision. Are the proposed
facilities consistent with the comprehensive planning for the area and with other plans
including the 201 , 208, 209 and 303(e) plans? If you have any further comments or
questions, please call 388-6111 , Extension 378.
Recommend Recommend No
Date Approval Disapproval Comment Signaty e of Representative
Mead Sanitation
1)-72-1/ K �i - ` �.t -% District
Local Government (Cities or Towns, if inside
municipal boundary or within 3 miles, and
Sewer District)
Board of County Commissioners
Local Health Authority
City/County Planning Authority
Regional Planning Agency
r-9- '7 Council pf Covet-went
ty`
S Geologist
I certify that signs have been posted in accordance with regulations entitled "Procedural
Regulations for Site Appli +'o for Sewage T�eatn t Work "
Date: / 1 d ri
Signature of Applicant
District Engineer Action:
Recommend Approval : Recommend Disapproval :
Date:
Signature
WQ-3(rev. 1/78-40) - 3 -
COLOR' DO DLFA5CMENT OF HEALTH
;later QLalit/ Control Divisio
4210 East 11th Avenue WELD COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Denver, Colorado 80220 0 T C1 S c^
APPLICATION FOR SITE APPROVAL OF CONSTRUCTION OR EXP ION 1 ^gg2
Th) SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT AND
B) LIFT STATIONS HAVING OVER 20,000 GPD CAPACITY GREELE7. cow.
APPLICANT: Milliken Sanitation District
ADDRESS: P.O. Box 290, Milliken, Colorado 80543 PHONE: 587-4620
Consulting Engineer's Name and Address: Hogan and Olhausen, Inc.
629-7124 (Metro)
2300 West Eisenhower Blvd. , Loveland, Colorado 80537 PHONE: 667-6286
A. Information regarding new sewage treatment plant:
1 . Briefly describe on a separate sheet of paper the reason for locating the sewage
treatment plant on this particular site. This should include, but is not
necessarily limited to, a description of the present and possible development
of the site location and service area. (Adding to existing plant)
2. Size and type of treatment facility proposed: .
Type Activated Sludge
GPD: 400,000 PE design Present PE
(gal/day) capacity 1300 to be served 450 _
% Domestic: 100% % Industrial : None _
3. Location of facility:
Attach a map of the area which includes the following: See Exhibits A and B
(a) 10-mile radius : all sewage treatment plants and lift stations.
(b) 5-mile radius: domestic water supply intakes.
(c) 1-mile radius : habitable buildings , location of potable water wells , and
an approximate indication of the topography.
4. Effluent will be discharged: Big Thompson River
(Watercourse)
Subsurface disposal : Land:
Evaporation: Other: _
State water quality classification of receiving watercourse(s) : _
5. Will a State or Federal grant be sought to finance any portion of this
project? Yes Residential
Commercial
6. What is the present zoning for the proposed service area? Industrial
Present zoning of site area? Agrigulture _
Zoning within a 1-mile radius of site? Agriculture, Residential , Commercial , Industria'
WQ-3(rev. 1-78-40) - 1 -
7. What is the distance Jwnstream from the discharge tc Lhe nearest domestic water
supply intake? None within 10 miles
(name and address of supply)
What is the distance downstream from the discharge to the nearest other point
of diversion Evans Town Ditch, 3700 Golden. Fvans, Colorado Rn620
(name and address of user)
3 miles - not used for domestic Purposes
8. Who has the responsibility for operating the facility? Milliken Sanitation District
9. Who owns the land upon which the facility will be constructed?
Milliken Sanitation District
Please attach copies of the document creating authority in the applicant to
construct the proposed facility.
10. Estimated project cost: $132,000.00
Who is financially responsible for the construction and operation of the
facility? Milliken Sanitation District
11 . Names and addresses of all water and sanitation districts within 5 miles downstream
of proposed wastewater treatment facility site.
Central Weld County Water District Little Thompson Water District
105 18th Street 307 Welch Avenue
Greeley, Colorado 80631 Berthoud, Colorado 80513
(Attach a separate sheet of paper if necessary. )
12. Is the facility in a 100 year flood plain? No - near edge
If so, what precautions are being taken? Existing and proposed aeration basin is
approximately nine (9) feet higher than edge of flood plain.
Has the flood plain been designated by the Colorado Water Conservation Board,
Department of Natural Resources?
If so, what is that designation?
13. Please include all additional factors that might help the Water Quality Control
Commission make an informed decision on your application for site approval .
Service and Feasibility Study of Sewerage Improvements for Milliken Sanitation
District, plus supplements 1 , 2 and 3 to the above study previously submitted to
WQCC. Letter approving Treatment Facility Improvements plans and specifications
by WQCC has been issued.
WQ-3(rev. 1-78-40) - 2 -
B. Information regarding lift stations : Not Applicable
1 . The proposed lift station when fully developed will generate the following
additional load:
Population Equivalent
Peak Hydraulic (MGD) to be served:
2. Is the site located in a 100 year flood plain? _
If yes, on a separate sheet of paper describe the protective measures to be taken.
3. Where will the overflow be discharged?
4. Name and address of facility providing treatment:
5. The proposed lift station when fully developed will increase the loading of the
facility to % of hydraulic and ° of organic capacity.
C. If the facility will be located on or adjacent to a site that is owned or managed by
a Federal or State agency, send the agency a copy of this application.
D. Recommendation of governmental authorities:
Please address the following issues in your recommendation decision. Are the proposed
facilities consistent with the comprehensive planning for the area and with other plans
including the 201 , 208, 209 and 303(e) plans? If you have any further comments or
questions, please call 388-6111 , Extension 378.
Recommend Recommend No
Date Approval Disapproval Comment Signature of Representative
,t 1 / , ✓, / / /. % , _ i' .
Local Government (Cities or Towns, if inside
municipal boundary or within 3 miles, and
S et Di rich -
&lard of County Commissioners
�t�� Ldca1 ealth Ft th ity
C• ty/County l nning Authority
Re Tonal Plannn n y Agen A
ii/.3/14 -- i
Council of Government---,,,,>\
\
State Geologist
Date: ;4(R1f,-L./, . /1. ( 1 /? c'a ..� cz.,
Signature of Applicant
District Engineer Action:
Recommend Approval : Recommend Disapproval : •
Date:
Signature
WQ-3(rev. 1/78-40) - 3 -
B.' information regarding lift ations : Not Applicable
1 . The proposed lift station when fully developed will generate the following
additional load:
Population Equivalent
Peak Hydraulic (MGD) to be served: _
2. Is the site located in a 100 year flood plain?
If yes, on a separate sheet of paper describe the protective measures to be taken.
3. Where will the overflow be discharged? _
J. Name and address of facility providing treatment:
5. The proposed lift station when fully developed will increase the loading of the
facility to % of hydraulic and % of organic capacity.
C. if the facility will be located on or adjacent to a site that is owned or ranaoed by
a Federal or State agency, send the agency a copy of this application .
D. Recommendation of governmental authorities:
Please address the following issues in your recommendation decision. Are the proposed
facilities consistent with the comprehensive planning for the area and with other plans
including the 201 , 208, 209 and 303(e) plans? If you have any further comments or
questions , please call 388-6111 , Extension 378.
Recommend Recommend No
Date Approval Disapproval Comment Signature of Representative
Local Government' (Cities or Towns, if inside
municipal boundary or within 3 miles , and
Sewer District)
•
Board of County Commissioners
Local Health Authority
City/County Planning Authority
Regional Planning Agency
Council of Government
to Geologist
ate: / l i1: l� ,/L. /1-42/(72,--,
Signa5ure of Applicant
istrict Engineer Action:
commend Approval : Recommend Disapproval : •
ate:
Signature
1-3(rev. 1/78-40) _ 3 _
Hello