HomeMy WebLinkAbout20080494.tiff t`�+1 MEMORANDUM
• vine TO: Board of County Commissioners
DATE: February 8, 2008
COLORADO
FROM: Chris Gathman— Planner II C •
SUBJECT: Proposed Amendment to USR-1636 Condition of Approval
1.G
Please replace condition 1.G with the following condition:
"The property owner shall submit a letter to the Board of County Commissioners requesting
that USR-836 and USR-1338 be vacated."
•
• EXHIBIT
E
osk* L.
gas -D4ci'i-i
Esther Gesick
Orom: Esther Gesick
ent: Thursday, February 21, 2008 10:00 AM
o: 'KEN NEUENS'
Subject: RE: Docket#2008-15
Thank you for your comments. They have been included with the case file as an Exhibit for
the Board's consideration.
Esther E. Gesick
Deputy Clerk to the Board
915 10th Street
Greeley, CO 80631
(970) 356-4000 X4226
(970) 352-0242 (fax)
Original Message
From: KEN NEUENS [mailto:ckneuens@q.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2008 9:22 AM
To: Esther Gesick
Subject: Docket#2008-15
We are writing to urge the board to deny the request for a kennel/training/retail pet
supply outlet that is to be located on State Highway 52 and approximately 1/4 mile east of
CR 1.We have lived at 354 CR 16 1\2 since 1973 and overlook the Boulder Creek Valley. We
don't believe that a commercial use such as the kennel is compatible with the surrounding
area nor is an agricultural use.
Thank
Ian for your consideration,
Christi
and Ken Neuens
• ir
USA #16,31,
1
Feb 26 08 11:14a Vern Bauer 303 828 0767 p.2
ATTN: Ester
FAX 970-352-0242
•
February 26,2008
RE: DOCKET#2008-15
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
My wife and I want to go on record to oppose the approval of the request for a site
specific development plan and use by special review permit# 1636 for a kennel(to
accommodate 150 dogs and 15 cats,along with training classes and a pet supply retail
component)in the A(agricultural)zone district.
Our property lies just North and adjacent to the Andreason's property. We have several
concerns:
1. We and the Andreasons' share a common drive way and we are concerned about
the additional traffic on our drive way due to the customers of the kennel and pet
supply retail component This extra traffic will interfere with our freedom to
come and go as we are accustomed,besides the additional wear and tear on our
• driveway. I installed this paved drive at a cost in excess of$25,000.00.
2. We have irrigation rights and are concerned that the construction and location of
the kennel will impede our access to ditch water. Our ditch comes through
their property.
3. We are concerned about the noise 150 animals can make,thus disturbing our
current life stile.
4. We are concerned about the additional traffic this facility will create on State Hwy
52. Currently,there are times that it is difficult to gain access to the highway from
our driveway because of the amount of traffic. Asphalt Specialties Inc.Is located
just East of our property and generates a lot of truck traffic onto Hwy 52. The
additional traffic to and from the kennel and retail component will just compound
the traffic problem.
Thank you for your consideration,
Vernon L. Bauer& Susan M. Bauer
389 State Hwy 52
Erie,CO 80516
• IEXHIBIT
use#lte3b
PLANNING COMMISSIONER' SIGN POSTING CERTIFICATE
• THE LAST DAY TO POST THE SIGN IS February 17, 2008. THE SIGN SHALL BE POSTED
ADJACENT TO AND VISIBLE FROM A PUBLICALLY MAINTAINED ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY.
IN THE EVENT THE PROPERTY BEING CONSIDERED FOR A SPECIAL REVIEW IS NOT
ADJACENT TO A PUBLICALLY MAINTAINED ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY, THE DEPARTMENT
OF PLANNING SERVICES SHALL POST ONE SIGN IN THE MOST PROMINENT PLACE ON
THE PROPERTY AND POST A SECOND SIGN AT THE POINT AT WHICH THE DRIVEWAY
(ACCESS DRIVE) INTERSECTS A PUBLICALLY MAINTAINED ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY.
I, CHRIS GATHMAN, HEREBY CERTIFY UNDER PENALTIES OF PERJURY THAT THE SIGN
WAS POSTED ON THE PROPERTY AT LEAST TEN DAYS BEFORE THE BOARD OF
COMMISSIONERS HEARING FOR USR-1636 IN THE AGRICULTURAL ZONE DISTRICT.
Chris Gathman
Name of Person Posting Sign
fl4 ±
Signature of Persoting Sign
• STATE OF COLORADO
) ss.
COUNTY OF WELD
The foregoing instrument was subscribed and sworn to me thid day of- , 2008.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
,II
Notary Public 111
BILLIE J. MOORE k
My Commission Expires: f� l )O NOTARY PUBLIC
ll
STATE OF COLORADO
• EXHIBIT
1 4 • 1 • `J
Co
_ O .-
ems `TAY •_ ._ Y • ! • \ ( t\ .,....,
4:i 1.7:17.' '"Li ' \6\ lir'sire:
N 4.
itall
le Za _ grl
Sas
ICIC
ilia ‘,19 tat r• :....
ce cz CD o
Za N k---
C � � • . Nib
� s in
a sawQ 3 ?al �st 2 fe � � �
C CD O 0 O gr- dite‘ utf. 0 ____ I &I N,
L., in O . .
''' Ls\ & ,16 cz 1Ra Z -........, Q
O ID a asse a)
icC
IL 0
xi - )40, . .
„ ig,
Cm I) C •— C CU
�2ItZ . ,I .
T'w`o° :_ ,,
03 C is W (1.1 p, ' \f‘LLI e < r is
a) a) 0
0. ` ii ciao 0 x o
y• N) 0 or j O
0 •an
C3) CC Li j ....... enej j 0 6 41
L L•— O W r Q. ipi es M F-) GM of \
CU ce a) La
•W N NI < is
CD
LIU c >% W teli crj (Z gV) 1 Y ut 1 j .....,
i a
= a. .o -- ql o 2
a am= O CO oass Rs Coe
sa Q U F- • W �r vi ,
CL. IrLi)k 3111 •.-y "
ci) o ^' f,
Q U LL,1 •
sia
, z u
is o
�, Cr (b 0 V ileJ,C '
,,,,, iL.,. ki,k
44 c , 7 I °.f
-- .•t.
1' CT`s � iii� fi'`'r r' r, ./ fa". 0. \,Is, • •, \ 4. (f Il
'! N/'
_r •`�•.1. * "�rYJ `. r i, _ ;j . ., may !t 'y f,i1�11• •s�^ F ..a..... • �ati
•
Exhibit I is an
oversized Site
Drawing
•
Please see original
in file
•
• Memorandum
TO: Chris Gathman, W.C. Planning
• DATE: December 19, 2007
FROM: Pam Smith, W.C. Department of Public
COLORADO Health and Environment
CASE NO.: USR-1636 NAME: Roger Andreason
•
The lot is located entirely within the boundary of the 100 year flood plain. No septic systems are
permitted to be installed within the flood way as stated in Colorado Department of Public Health
and Environment ISDS Guidelines Section VIII (17). The flood way has not been delineated on the
plat map.
The Department recommends the following conditions be placed in the Resolution:
V5(a . the applicant determine and delineate the flood way boundary on the plat map and
locate primary and secondary septic envelopes outside the designated flood way
boundary.
• The Department recommends that language for the preservation and/or protection of the second
absorption field envelope be placed in the development standards. The development standard
should read:
• Activities such as landscaping (i.e. planting of trees and shrubs) and construction
(i.e. auxiliary structures, dirt mounds, etc.) activities are expressly prohibited in the
designated absorption field envelope.
As stated above: No septic systems are permitted to be installed within the flood way (Flood Zone
A) as stated in Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment ISDS Guidelines Section
VIII (17). There is no exception to this prohibition.
• EXHIBIT
us24frl lo3b
ICJ ///ia. v
I
i /
USR-946-kennel
.2„„,,,1/47O.7
_ } J2nd AMUSR 4
CR1
• •
/
/ USR-1233
Home Business —
Highway
•• Hi hl nd Fa s
_e_i
Highview Ranch--r-
6 5 LA
VWstview Estates
///t/
///// i7/////////////.
jril rr11
• \tvii
V- -
,
Hello