The URL can be used to link to this page

Browse Search

Home My WebLink About20092176.tiffHEARING CERTIFICATION DOCKET NO. 2009-42.A RE: SITE SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND THIRD AMENDED USE BY SPECIAL REVIEW PERMIT #1282 FOR AN AGRICULTURAL SERVICE ESTABLISHMENT, PRIMARILY ENGAGED IN PERFORMING AGRICULTURAL, ANIMAL HUSBANDRY, OR HORTICULTURAL SERVICES ON A FEE OR CONTRACT BASIS, INCLUDING LIVESTOCK CONFINEMENT OPERATIONS (A LIVESTOCK FEEDING OPERATION FOR A TOTAL OF 11,240 HEAD OF CATTLE - INCLUDING A DAIRY OPERATION AND 20 HORSES, AN ADDITIONAL MILK PARLOR, OFFICE/SCALE HOUSE, ADDITIONAL PENS, AND REMOVING THE LIMIT OF 2,000 DAIRY CATTLE (OUT OF THE 11,240 HEAD TOTAL) ASSOCIATED WITH THE OPERATION AMENDED TO INCLUDE A NEW STORMWATER POND AND EFFLUENT STORAGE, A NEW SEDIMENT BASIN, COMMODITY AREA AND EXPANSION OF THE COMPOST AREA) IN THE A (AGRICULTURAL) ZONE DISTRICT- JOHN AND DOROTHY JOHNSON A public hearing was conducted on August 19, 2009, at 10:00 a.m., with the following present: Commissioner William F. Garcia, Chair Commissioner Douglas Rademacher, Pro-Tem - EXCUSED Commissioner Sean P. Conway - EXCUSED Commissioner Barbara Kirkmeyer Commissioner David E. Long Also present: Acting Clerk to the Board, Jennifer VanEgdom County Attorney, Bruce Barker Planning Department representative, Chris Gathman Health Department representative, Troy Swain Public Works representative, Don Carroll The following business was transacted: I hereby certify that pursuant to a notice dated June 22, 2009, a public hearing was conducted on July 22, 2009, to consider the request of John and Dorothy Johnson for a Site Specific Development Plan and Third Amended Use by Special Review Permit #1282 for an Agricultural Service Establishment, primarily engaged in performing agricultural, animal husbandry, or horticultural services on a fee or contract basis, including Livestock Confinement Operations (a livestock feeding operation for a total of 11,240 head of cattle - including a dairy operation and 20 horses, an additional milk parlor, office/scale house, additional pens, and removing the limit of 2,000 dairy cattle (out of the 11,240 head total) associated with the operation amended to include a new stormwater pond, and effluent storage, a new sediment basin, commodity area and expansion of the compost area) in the A (Agricultural) Zone District. At said hearing on July 22, 2009, the Board deemed it advisable to continue the matter to August 19, 2009, to allow adequate time to meet publication requirements prior to consideration of the matter by the Planning Commission on August 4, 2009. At said hearing on August 19, 2009, Bruce Barker, County Attorney, made this a matter of record. Chair Garcia advised the applicant's representative, Tom Haren, that he has the option of continuing the matter to a date when the full Board will be present. However, if he decides to proceed today, the matter will require three 00 T, P't, ?lo. tft 09/7 / 2009-2176 0� PL0741 HEARING CERTIFICATION - JOHN AND DOROTHY JOHNSON (3RD AMUSR #1282) PAGE 2 affirmative votes, or the matter will be deemed denied. Mr. Haren indicated he would like to proceed today. Chris Gathman, Department of Planning Services, presented a brief summary of the proposal and entered the favorable recommendation of the Planning Commission into the record as written. He stated the second amended permit allowed up to 11,240 head of cattle, and this amendment includes provision for a new pond for stormwater and effluent storage, a new sediment basin, commodity area, and expansion of the composting area. He indicated the site is located south of County Road 74, and east of County Road 47, and is agricultural in nature, with existing residences located within close proximity to the east and south. He gave a brief description of the uses of surrounding properties and confirmed an existing feedlot, the Booth feedlot, is located north of County Road 74. He stated the applicant is proposing to expand the composting area by 700 feet to the south and approximately 1,000 feet to the southeast of the previously approved area approved through the second amended permit. He indicated the boundaries of the USR permit will not be modified; however, the location of the manure and commodity storage areas, and the location of the pond will be modified within the boundaries of the site. Upon further review, Mr. Gathman clarified a property to the southwest, now owned by the applicant, will be incorporated into the boundaries of the USR permit. He stated thirteen referral agencies reviewed the application materials, and seven provided comments which have been addressed within the Conditions of Approval and Development Standards. He indicated the Colorado Divisions of Wildlife and Water Resources did not provide a referral response. Mr. Gathman stated two E -mails of opposition have been received from a surrounding property owner, Debbie Warehime, citing concerns regarding the expansion of the facility which occurred after the second amended permit was approved in December, 2006. He clarified in August, 2007, it was indicated that the applicant was considering an expansion of the composting area, and planning staff held discussions whether the expansion would constitute a substantial change to the USR permit. He further clarified the applicant submitted a formal request in November, 2007, to keep composting activities as shown on the plat, and in December, 2007, Planning staff determined the expansion of the composting area would be considered as a substantial change to the USR permit. He stated in Spring, 2008, the Department held a pre -application meeting with the applicant, at which time additional revisions to the USR permit were discussed, including: the addition of a pond, to address overflow and runoff flows onto County Road 47; an additional milking parlor; increasing the head of cattle to 18,000; and the addition of an anaerobic digester facility. He clarified staff determined that the digester facility would not constitute a substantial change, as long as the facility were to be digesting compost generated on the site. He further clarified the applicant submitted a preliminary application, with no plans for a digester facility and without the request for increase of the head of cattle, and the complete application was submitted in Spring, 2009. Mr. Gathman reiterated the number of cattle will not increase, nor will the number of employees at the facility, and the Department is requiring that the applicant submit a Landscape and Screening Plan to mitigate impacts for surrounding property owners to the east and south of the site. He confirmed the applicant previously planted cottonwood trees along the southern boundary of the property; however, the composting activities will now be in closer proximity to the surrounding properties He indicated surrounding property owners at the Planning Commission hearing indicated a preference for solid screening material, and confirmed the 2009-2176 PL0741 HEARING CERTIFICATION - JOHN AND DOROTHY JOHNSON (3RD AMUSR #1282) PAGE 3 applicant does stack hay bales along the southern boundary, which provides a substantial wall. He clarified the use of berms and screening east of the stormwater pond is limited, since the integrity of the pond cannot be compromised. He stated the Department is requiring the submission of a Lighting Plan, to verify that the lights on the site are correctly shielded. He confirmed the applicant will operate in accordance with Confined Animal Feeding Operation (CAFO) Regulations, and the various Conditions of Approval and Development Standards provide more oversight of the facility than a facility which is operated as a Use by Right. Mr. Gathman displayed photographs of the site and surrounding areas. In response to Chair Garcia, Mr. Gathman indicated Commissioner Holton abstained during the Planning Commission hearing because of a conflict of interest. Mr. Barker confirmed Commissioner Holton indicated he provides feed to the dairy, and it was determined that the business relationship constituted a conflict of interest. Troy Swain, Department of Public Health and Environment, indicated the Department recommends approval of the amendment, and the Conditions of Approval and Development Standards from the second amended USR permit have carried forward for this amendment, plus a few updated ones. He clarified the language regarding the composting activities has been modified, due to the modifications enacted by the State, and he confirmed the facility will be permitted as an agricultural composting facility. He stated Development Standard #27 requires that the applicant provide evidence of certification for the pond. He further stated Development Standards #15, #16, #17, #18, #19, #24 and #25 address potential nuisance conditions. He requested the deletion of Development Standard #13, which was a carryover from the previous permit, and the issue has since been addressed. Don Carroll, Department of Public Works, stated County Road 74 is classified as a strategic roadway, and County Road 47 is classified as an arterial roadway, requiring 140 feet of right-of-way at full buildout. He indicated recent traffic counts indicate approximately 160 vehicles utilize County Road 47, and approximately 1,300 vehicles utilize County Road 74, on a daily basis. He confirmed Janet Carter, Department of Public Works, is present to discuss traffic impacts. Mr. Carroll indicated the milking parlor, scale house, and corral have an appropriate setback distance from the future right-of-way, and the future right-of-way dimensions need to be recorded on the plat. He stated the Department is requesting that the applicant utilize the access to the feedlots, which contains an existing road system east of the concrete ditch and County Road 47, as much as possible. He further stated the Department desires to minimize accesses onto County Road 74, and he confirmed the applicant has closed an access on County Road 74, at the east end of the facility, which previously led to the commodity area. He indicated the site contains adequate parking, no trucks are being staged along the roads, and employees are parking next to the milking parlors and scale house. He further indicated the internal parking areas are surfaced with gravel, and a Dust Abatement Plan for County Road 47 was previously approved in August, 2007. He confirmed the applicant is required to provide dust abatement measures no less than twice per year, or more often, as determined by the motorgrader supervisor. Chair Garcia questioned whether there are any active accesses on County Road 74, or if they have all been closed. In response, Ms. Carter stated one other access still exists on County Road 74, which is a wide -access area, and the Department would like to work with the applicant to create an overall access management plan for the site. She confirmed there are fourteen 2009-2176 PL0741 HEARING CERTIFICATION - JOHN AND DOROTHY JOHNSON (3RD AMUSR #1282) PAGE 4 existing accesses on County Road 47, and the Department desires to work, in conjunction with the applicant, to reduce the number of accesses since County Road 47 will become a future arterial roadway. She stated there have been a total of seven vehicle accidents within the past four years, and one accident resulted in a fatality, due to improper passing. She further stated the 85th percentile of traffic speed is 65 miles per hour for County Road 74 and 55 miles per hour for County Road 47. She confirmed the sight distance at the intersection of County Road 74 and 47 is limited when a vehicle stops at the Stop sign; however, if a vehicle pulls up a couple of feet, it is possible to see over 1,200 feet in each direction. In response to Chair Garcia, Ms. Carter indicated the Department is reviewing the possibility of moving the Stop sign forward within the intersection, in order to provide adequate sight distance for vehicles. Mr. Haren represented the applicant and reviewed his Powerpoint presentation. He indicated the three modifications included within the 3rd Amended USR Permit are the inclusion of the required stormwater pond, the relocation of the commodity area, and the expansion of the compost area, all within the existing USR boundary. He confirmed the number of animal units located on the site, the manure volume, and the amount of traffic will not be increased. He reviewed the applicant's obligation to meet the criteria listed within Section 23-2-230.6 of the Weld County Code, and confirmed the improvements proposed on the site will maintain consistency with the surrounding area. He stated the site is located four miles from the Town of Eaton, within a predominantly agricultural area, and he reiterated the boundary will not be modified from the 2nd Amended USR permit. He clarified the access for the feed commodity area used to be located on County Road 74; however, the commodity area has been moved to the southwest portion of the site, and the access on County Road 74 was closed. He further clarified new legislation has required changes in the way stormwater must be contained, which prompted the requirement of a new pond to contain runoff. Mr. Haren clarified although the compost area has been expanded, the volume of manure to be composted will remain the same, and he confirmed the relocation of the commodity area, at the request of Weld County, does allow for safer access. He stated, as of February, 2009, Colorado Regulation 81 requires facilities to implement and follow a Nutrient Management Plan, in order to meet discharge requirements implemented by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). He confirmed the dairy was required to initiate volume changes in order to meet the new federal requirement. He indicated the composting area was expanded to improve composting activities on the site, which are operated by A-1 Organics, and the modification was prompted by Section 14 of the Colorado Solid Waste Regulations, which became effective July 31, 2009. He reiterated the changes to the facility were all prompted by governmental agencies. Mr. Haren indicated the primary access is on County Road 47, and the applicant has elected to construct a fence along County Road 47 to restrict the number of accesses to the site. He indicated the applicant has entered into a Road Maintenance and Improvements Agreement with the County, and dust suppression activities will continue, as described. He confirmed all of the structures on the site are located outside of the 140 -foot right-of-way, and he reiterated there will not be an increase of intensity at the site through this amendment. Responding to Chair Garcia, Mr. Haren confirmed a Landscaping Plan was required through previous amendments, which was approved in conjunction with an Improvements Agreement, and the necessary collateral was released once the trees were planted at the site. He clarified it does take time for the trees to grow; however, the trees are already approximately seven feet in height. He further clarified the placement of screening material is limited in portions of the site 2009-2176 PL0741 HEARING CERTIFICATION - JOHN AND DOROTHY JOHNSON (3RD AMUSR #1282) PAGE 5 due to the engineering of the stormwater pond. He confirmed the applicant does stack straw and bedding material along the southern boundary of the site, which provides natural screening for the surrounding property owners, and the applicant intends to continue stacking in this location; however, the inventory usually drops within the summer months and is re -stocked during the fall. Mr. Haren indicated a new solid metal fence exists along the northern portion of the property, adjacent to County Road 74. Further responding to Chair Garcia, Mr. Haren confirmed the applicant has discussed an Access Management Plan with the Department of Public Works; however, the plan has not been discussed in detail. He indicated the applicant is committed to an ongoing cooperative effort to improve safety within the area. He explained the original Carlson homestead is located at the southeast corner of the intersection of County Roads 74 and 47, which blocks the view of the traffic on County Road 74; however, once a vehicle pulls forward a few feet, adequate sight distance does exist. He agreed that the fast speeds along County Road 74 are a concern; however, he is not sure what mitigation measures the applicant could provide. He confirmed the applicant will encourage his employees to curb the speed within the area. Mr. Barker requested, and Mr. Haren agreed, to provide a copy of the Powerpoint presentation for the record, to be marked as Exhibit D. Elizabeth Wilkinson, surrounding property owner, indicated her property is located directly south of the dairy facility. She indicated she is pleased that the applicant is committed to completing composting activities on the site, and she appreciates when the applicant is able to stack hay along the southern boundary of the site, as it provides a great buffer. She expressed her concerns regarding the deteriorating compost piles blowing onto her property, and she requested that the applicant be conscientious about controlling the compost piles. She further expressed her concerns regarding trash generated on the applicant's property, and she confirmed she is consistently finding a large amount of trash and medical waste which has blown onto her property. She confirmed she frequently has children on her property, and she is concerned about the children touching and picking up the medical waste, specifically used veterinary gloves. She indicated if the applicant were required to construct some type of fence along the southern boundary, the trash would be kept on the applicant's property, instead of blowing onto hers. In response to Commissioner Kirkmeyer, Ms. Wilkinson indicated the placement of her property on the map provided, and confirmed she has lived at her residence for 12.5 years. Bob Yost, A-1 Organics, confirmed his company conducts the physical composting activities on the site, and the company has been in business for 35 years, earning several awards for its composting practices. He indicated the same composting techniques utilized at other facilities are also utilized at this facility, and the composting activities are regulated and must meet minimum standards. He confirmed composting is highly encouraged to meet Best Management Practices for manure management, and it is common to expect changes to operations when new regulatory requirements are finalized. He expressed his support for the applicant's request, and indicated he is available to answer any questions specific to composting activities. Responding to Chair Garcia, Mr. Yost indicated today's testimony is the first time he has been made aware of the concerns regarding blowing matter from the composting piles, and he confirmed he will be responsive to the concerns. He clarified water control may be utilized as a dust abatement measure, and he believes some of the dust blowing may not be originating from the composting piles, rather, it may be blowing from other portions of the property. 2009-2176 PL0741 HEARING CERTIFICATION - JOHN AND DOROTHY JOHNSON (3RD AMUSR #1282) PAGE 6 Mr. Haren clarified he has completed additional analysis, since concerns were presented at the Planning Commission hearing, and he explained that the valley within the property naturally acts as a wind funnel. He indicated the applicant it committed to utilize the southernmost portion of the property for stockpiling, which creates a physical wall between the neighboring properties. He explained the windrows for the composting activities were taller in the past, since there was less overall area, and once the piles are spread out, they can be worked faster and more efficiently, which will help with the concerns of blowing dirt. He further explained good management practices and increased oversight of the area will also alleviate concerns. He confirmed the applicant does contract commercial trash service for the site, and occasionally tarps are blown around in the wind and have a tendency to tear. He indicated the applicant was previously unaware of the trash problem occurring; however, the applicant has just now indicated that it will be corrected. He clarified the applicant believes the problem may actually be stemming from a tenant property, and he will increase diligence as the property owner to resolve the situation. Responding to Chair Garcia, Mr. Haren indicated be believes Ms. Wilkinson was referring to palpation gloves, which are typically utilized within the working area of the barns. He clarified the operations which utilize these types of gloves are usually subcontracted, including veterinary practices, and the applicant is committed to talk to the subcontractors to ensure that waste products are properly disposed of. In response to Commissioner Kirkmeyer, Mr. Haren indicated Condition of Approval #4.C, requiring Fire District approval, was carried over from the previous amendment, and he suggested that the Condition be deleted since it does not serve any purpose. Mr. Gathman clarified the Condition is included to serve as a reminder that signoff from the Fire District is required for the construction of any future buildings on the site. Responding to Chair Garcia, Mr. Haren indicated Development Standard #8, limiting the number of employees on the site, is still applicable; however, Development Standard #9, limiting the number of truck trips on a daily basis is a light number. He clarified the applicant is not proposing additional truck trips to the facility, and he questioned what level of truck traffic would trigger additional mitigation measures for safety concerns. He indicated the applicant would prefer not to have a specific cap on the allowed number of truck trips. He reiterated the Landscaping Plan has previously been submitted, and the applicant is willing to continue to store commodities along the southern boundary of the site, when inventory is available, to create a barrier between properties. He confirmed Conditions of Approval #1.6 and #1.L.4 are adequate to ensure that the applicant will comply with, and will maintain, the Landscaping Plan, and he concurred with the recommendation to delete Development Standard #13. Ms. Carter expressed her concern regarding a change to the allowed number of daily truck trips. She indicated, depending on the distribution of the additional truck trips, the need for construction of acceleration or deceleration lanes may be triggered. She confirmed the Department did not complete any additional analysis for this site since it was previously indicated that the total of truck traffic would not be modified through this amendment. She stated County Road 74 does contain vehicles traveling at a high speed and there has been a recent traffic accident caused by improper passing, therefore, it is her preference that the applicant adhere to the limit of traffic trips indicated within the Resolution. She clarified a variance of approximately five truck trips per day would be acceptable; however, anything in excess of that would require an additional traffic impact analysis. She further clarified Mr. Carroll mentioned to her that the previous limitations may have been initiated due to the 2009-2176 PL0741 HEARING CERTIFICATION - JOHN AND DOROTHY JOHNSON (3RD AMUSR #1282) PAGE 7 limited amount of semi -truck parking on the site. Responding to Chair Garcia, Ms. Carter confirmed if the truck traffic were to increase in the future, she will recommend that the applicant be required to construct acceleration and deceleration lanes once more than ten vehicles per day are making a left-hand turn into the site, or more than 25 vehicles are making a right-hand turn. She indicated the truck traffic being spread over a 24 -hour period does help alleviate some of the traffic concerns; however, a majority of the traffic does travel to the site during peak hours. Further responding to Chair Garcia, Mr. Swain indicated if more than 100 employees will be utilizing the septic system on the site, the regulations would need to be reviewed for any additional requirements. Commissioner Kirkmeyer indicated her concerns with the language within the second sentence of Condition of Approval #1.B, specifically the word "shall" and she does not want the applicant to be caught in a bad situation if the commodity stock is low at some point in the year. She questioned whether there are drill envelopes delineated on the site, as referenced within Condition of Approval #1.J, and if not, the language should be deleted. In response, Mr. Haren indicated these concerns have been addressed within previous amendments to the permit, and he concurred with the deletion of the last sentence of Condition of Approval #1.J. Mr. Gathman also concurred with the proposed deletion and clarified the applicant has adequately addressed any issues. Commissioner Kirkmeyer indicated she concurs with Ms. Carter regarding the number of truck trips to the site; however she is concerned with the time limitations described within Development Standard #9. Mr. Haren clarified it has been historically understood that the truck trip numbers are typical everyday numbers; however, during harvest season, the trucks will run 24 hours per day. He confirmed staff has worked with the applicant regarding this issue; however, it is not specially addressed within the Development Standards, therefore, it is possible for a misunderstanding to occur. He clarified agricultural operations will occasionally require an increase in truck traffic. Commissioner Kirkmeyer requested the deletion of the hours listed at the end of Development Standard #9, to be replaced with the words "on average," so that the language reads, "...shall be limited to fifteen (15) trucks per day, on average." She also requested the deletion of Development Standards #29, #30, and #31 since the language is included within the Conditions of Approval. Following discussion between the Board and Mr. Gathman, the Board concurred with the replacement of the word "shall" with the word "may' within the second sentence of Condition of Approval #1.B. The Board further concurred with the deletion of the last sentence of Condition of Approval #1.J, the modification of Development Standard #9, as previously described by Commissioner Kirkmeyer, and the deletion of Development Standard #13, as previously requested by Mr. Swain. In response to Chair Garcia, Mr. Gathman indicated he does not have any concerns with the deletion of Development Standards #29, #30, and #31, and the Board concurred with the deletions. In response to Chair Garcia, Mr. Haren indicated he, and the applicant, have reviewed and concur with the Conditions of Approval and Development Standards, as modified. Commissioner Kirkmeyer moved to approve the request of John and Dorothy Johnson for a Site Specific Development Plan and Third Amended Use by Special Review Permit #1282 for an Agricultural Service Establishment, primarily engaged in performing agricultural, animal husbandry, or horticultural services on a fee or contract basis, including Livestock Confinement 2009-2176 PL0741 HEARING CERTIFICATION - JOHN AND DOROTHY JOHNSON (3RD AMUSR #1282) PAGE 8 Operations (a livestock feeding operation for a total of 11,240 head of cattle - including a dairy operation and 20 horses, an additional milk parlor, office/scale house, additional pens, and removing the limit of 2,000 dairy cattle (out of the 11,240 head total) associated with the operation amended to include a new stormwater pond, and effluent storage, a new sediment basin, commodity area and expansion of the compost area) in the A (Agricultural) Zone District, based on the recommendations of Planning staff and the Planning Commission, with the Conditions of Approval and Development Standards as entered into the record. Her motion included the replacement of the word "shall" with the word "may' within the second sentence of Condition of Approval #1.B; the deletion of the last sentence of Condition of Approval #1.J to read, "The applicant shall either submit a copy of an agreement with the property's mineral owner/operators, stipulating that the oil and gas activities have been adequately incorporated into the design of the site, or show evidence that an adequate attempt has been made to mitigate the concerns of the mineral owner/operators."; the modification of Development Standard #9 to replace the words "between the hours of 7:00 a.m., and 5:00 p.m." with the words "on average" to read, "Semi -tractor trailers picking up milk shall be limited to fifteen (15) trucks per 24 -hour period, and semi -trailer commodity trucks (feed/compost) shall be limited to fifteen (15) trucks per day, on average."; and the deletion of Development Standards #13, #29, #30, and #31, with the required re -numeration. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Long, and he indicated the third amendment permit will satisfy the new requirements, without modification to animal units or traffic impact, and the changes will improve the operation of the facility to help reduce impacts to surrounding property owners. Chair Garcia expressed his appreciation to the applicant for the willingness to make modifications to existing accesses, and he believes the changes requested are necessary for the safety of the public. He requested that the applicant continue to work in conjunction with the surrounding property owners, and to keep the lines of communication open. He requested that surrounding property owners notify the Department of Public Health and Environment if there are concerns regarding the operation of the facility. There being no further discussion, the motion carried unanimously. There being no further discussion, the hearing was completed at 11:15 a.m. 2009-2176 PL0741 HEARING CERTIFICATION - JOHN AND DOROTHY JOHNSON (3RD AMUSR #1282) PAGE 9 This Certification was approved on the 24th day of August, 2009. ATTEST: Weld County Clerk to BY: Deputy Clerk to the Bo APP ROI/ D AS T• ORM: ounty Attorney David E. Long BOARD OF UNTY COMMISSIONERS W y COLORADO William F. Garcia, Chair FXCUSFI) Douglas Rademacher, Pro-Tem EXCUSED Se P. Conway Kirkmeyer 2009-2176 PL0741 EXHIBIT INVENTORY CONTROL SHEET Case 3RDAMUSR #1282 - JOHN AND DOROTHY JOHNSON Exhibit Submitted By A. Planning Staff Description Inventory of Items Submitted B. Planning Commission Resolution of Recommendation Summary of Hearing (Minutes dated August 4, 2009, C. Planning Commission and July 7, 2009) D. Applicant Copy of PowerPoint Presentation E. F. L. O. P. Q. R. S. T. U. V. W. ATTENDANCE RECORD HEARINGS ARE AS FOLLOWS ON THIS 19TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2009: Ca • .• § .Cc § C - 2a0 — IA c c % C ok w CD 0I I I 00 2NN §§§ kkk PLEASE legibly write or print your name and complete address. 123 Nowhere Street, City, State, Zip 3 / y v's' f I/ y it h L z \ , 0 \ e0 K \ s \ \ � � R INd /\ 6% \ \ , ` ^ 0 y 2 \ z ` y -4.- \ , /, S f Lk \« C' «®/ •c& q �.. ,� / \\ .. to . -- ce 2 �3$/ s t 3 m 1.\r? © -k- »� \ ° NAME John Doe d L4 E \ 2 \, cc \ w . , /� } :\. 1 > ---4- »,� • • • ATTENDANCE RECORD HEARINGS ARE AS FOLLOWS ON THIS 22ND DAY OF JULY, 2009: C) i R m I- d C C i N i C 01 o a y CO m J a t m c o c x `o d O 13 c ` co13 m co Q7 N C C t ca • to I C) M 0)0)0) ## YYY O • OO 0 O O PLEASE legibly write or print your name and complete address. ssaaaav 123 Nowhere Street, City, State, Zip 1 c 64 e) r to 36,50q CL? y/ icrfnJ r1 S'O61 M � �' z ‘N\ -,f A N tt�c v b -- n NAME John Doe S :3 /7" Hello