The URL can be used to link to this page

Browse Search

Home My WebLink About20093814.tiffO 0 X MISC. 1 6560 -RECORDING FEE 4730 -INVESTIGATION FEEL 4430 -COPIES 4430 -MAPS / POSTAGE NJ N.) +n _ 0 I v v N ' I2 'w io, iD 4221 -RE -SUBDIVISIONS 4221 -ADDITIONAL 30% FEE FOR SUB's # OF BUILDABLE LOTS 4221-MINOR/MAJOR SUB 4221-PUD 4221 -CHANGE OF ZONE 4221 -SITE PLAN REVIEW a ' m Xi 4221-ZPMH 4221-RE/SE Permit Type Z O NJ i --b o- Description I r P Fee :wad penlaoad N N .o Iromv XI* 3 r o N G Z Z -I e; to az M a to - Z .Z1 Oz -in N wO?z0 000�ZAr 7 o yyA m� co %Xo 'O to C O 0z 6 m N y b • N O 0 Michelle Martin From: Sent: To: CO: Subject: Michelle Martin Thursday, January 29, 2009 10:41 AM 'GLAZEMW @vzw.blackberry.net' John Barry; Linda Glaze; Thomas Honn; Stephanie Arries RE: CZ -1148 Mike, If the Change of Zone plat is recorded and the property changes from Agricultural to Industrial (I-3) the only way to reverse it back to Agricultural is by going back through the change of zone process. Therefore if you would like to set up another meeting to discuss your options just let me know. From your last email it does not appear that you would like to meet tomorrow, is that correct? Michelle Martin Planner II 4209 CR 24.5 Longmont, CO 80504 mmartin@co.weld.co.us PHONE: (720) 652-4210 x 8730 FAX: (720) 652-4211 Please tell us how we're doing: http://www.co.weld.co.us/departments/planning/comp_improve_comments.cfm Original Message From: GLAZEMW@vzw.blackberry.net [mailto: GLAZEMWQvzw. blackberry. net) Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2009 9:46 AM To: Michelle Martin Cc: John Barry; Linda Glaze; Thomas Honn Subject: Re: CZ -1148 Yes Michelle, I am diverting from the established time line. Again, there is no need to pursue the SPR if the variance is not approved. I am not interested in throwing $1300.00 away. As stated numerous times before, if someone had told me about the encroachment problem with the portable storage units, I would have addressed it sooner. Maybe your not understanding, if the variance isn't allowed, Discount Plumbing will be forced to find another location to operate from. As far as the established time line, if your office or representatives of your office had truly been looking out for my welfare as you have stated numerous times, we would not be under the gun to get this accomplished. If the County wishes to proceed with the lawsuit, that is your choice. I will defend my interest as necessary. I however, am not going to spend one dime more than is necessary to accomplish what is needed. Should the variance not be approved, I will request that the zoning be reversed and the fees paid, returned. This will have proven to be nothing more than a waste of time for all parties involved. Which could have been completely avoided if someone had taken the time months ago to make me aware of the potential problems these storage cans pose. I will drop off the mylar this afternoon and contact you next week when the BOA application is complete. Michael W. Glaze Original Message From: Michelle Martin To: Michael Glaze Cc: John Barry Cc: Linda Glaze Cc: BethanySalzman Cc: Stephanie Arries Subject: RE: CZ -1148 Sent: Jan 29, 2009 09:07 Mike, 1 Q Feel free to drop off the mylar anytime today along with the $11.00 recording fee. I though we were meeting tomorrow in order for you to submit your applications? If this is not the case please let me know. At our last meeting on Monday Jan: 19, 2009 we discussed the below timeline and now it appears you have chosen to divert from that timeline. Therefore, I have forwarded your last email and this one to the County Attorney in regards to your progress/timeline. Let me know if you have any questions. Timeline - discussed on Jan 19 Jan 30, 2009 will have all conditions meet and the plat submitted for recording. Jan 30, 2009 will submit two applications to the Weld County Department of Planning Services (BOA for a variance and SPR) The BOA hearing will be scheduled for an April hearing SPR conditions will be meet and the plat will be ready for recording by May 1, 2009., Michelle Martin Planner II 4209 CR.24.5 Longmont, CO 80504 mmartin@co.weld.co.us PHONE: (720) 652-4210 x 8730 FAX: (720) 652-4211 Please tell us how we're doing: http://www.co.weld.co.us/departments/planning/comp_improve_comments.cfm Original Message From: GLAZEMW@vzw.blackberry.net[mailtp:GLAZEMW@vzw.blackberry.net] Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2009 8:28 AM To: Michelle Martin Cc: John Barry; Linda Glaze Subject: CZ -1148 Michelle, Good morning, I am in receipt of the mylar drawing. I will drop it off at your office this afternoon. Is there any reason for us to meet? I am in hopes of having the BOA application completed by the end of next week and submitted on Friday. Is there any thing I'm missing? Mike Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry 2 Michelle Martin From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Michelle Martin Thursday, January 29, 2009 9:08 AM 'GLAZEMW@vzw.blackberry.net' John Barry; Linda Glaze; Bethany Salzman; Stephanie Arries RE: CZ -1148 Mike, Feel free to drop off the mylar anytime today along with the $11.00 recording fee. I though we were meeting tomorrow in order for you to submit your applications? If this is not the case please let me know. At our last meeting on Monday Jan. 19, 2009 we discussed the below timeline and now it appears you have chosen to divert from that timeline. Therefore, I have forwarded your last email and this one to the County Attorney in regards to your progress/timeline. Let me know if you have any questions. Timeline - discussed on Jan 19 Jan 30, 2009 will have all conditions meet and the plat submitted for recording. Jan 30, 2009 will submit two applications to the Weld County Department of Planning Services (BOA for a variance and SPR) The BOA hearing will be scheduled for an April hearing SPR conditions will be meet and the plat will be ready for recording by May 1, 2009. Michelle Martin Planner II 4209 CR 24.5 Longmont, CO 80504 mmartin@co.weld.co.us PHONE: (720) 652-4210 x 8730 FAX: (720) 652-4211 Please tell us how we're doing: http://www.co.weld.co.us/departments/planning/comp_improve_comments.cfm Original Message From: GLAZEMW@vzw.blackberry.net [mailto: GLAZEMW@vzw.blackberry.net] Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2009 8:28 AM To: Michelle Martin Cc: John Barry; Linda Glaze Subject: CZ -1148 Michelle, Good morning, I am in receipt of the mylar drawing. I will drop it off at your office this afternoon. Is there any reason for us to meet? I am in hopes of having the BOA application completed by the end of next week and submitted on Friday. Is there any thing I'm missing? Mike Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry 1 O Michelle Martin From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: GLAZEMW@vzw.blackberrY.net Wednesday, January 28, 2009 9:50 AM Michelle Martin John Barry; Linda Glaze SPR Michelle,' Linda and I'have given strong consideration to fact that the Board of Adjustment may rule against us and not allow us our variance. Should this happen, our property will no longer facilitate our needs as business people. We will be forced to relocate our operation. Therefore we would have no use for completing a Sight Plan Review. Once we find out from the BOA whether or not a variance is to be granted, we will react to that information accordingly. As you have stated these fees are non-refundable, it would be a waste of money to apply for the SRP if the property is no longer suitable for our needs. We will have the variance application completed in the next few days and submit it for process. Michael W. Glaze Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry 1 Michelle Martin From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Michelle Martin Tuesday, January 27, 2009 10:51 AM IGLAZEMW@vzw.blackberry.net John Barry RE: FYI I could meet you Friday at 2:00 at the Weld County SW office, because the office is closed on Friday give me a call when you are here and I will meet you out front. Let me know if you have any questions. Michelle Martin Planner II 4209 CR 24.5 Longmont, CO 80504 mmartin@co.weld.co.us PHONE: (720) 652-4210 x 8730 FAX: (720) 652-4211 Please tell us how we're doing: http://www.co.weld.co.us/departments/planning/comp_improve_comments.cfm Original Message From: GLAZEMW@vzw.blackberry.net(mailto:GLAZEMW@vzw.blackberry.net) Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2009 9:36 AM To: Michelle Martin Cc: John Barry Subject: FYI Michelle, I have had an unexpected trip to Rock Springs, Wyoming arise. I will be gone all day tomorrow, returning Thursday morning. If we can make our appointment for Friday afternoon. Let me know what time and where. Thanks. Michael W. Glaze Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry 1 C Page 1 of 2 Michelle Martin From: Michelle Martin Sent: Monday, January 26, 2009 3:36 PM To: 'hammersurveying@comcast.net Cc: 'GLAZEMW@vzw.blackberry.net'; Linda Glaze; John Barry; Thomas Honn Subject: RE: SIGNATURE BLOCKS FOR GLAZE REZONE PLAT Gary, In regards to your questions: On the property owner's approval under the notarial certificate after the forgoing instrument was acknowledged before me by, are the owners names printed on these lines? No this will be filled in by the Notary In the Surveyor's Statement do I print my name again under the signature line after the l,? Yes On both the Commissioners certificate and Planning Commission certificate shown it read as describer or described? described Let me know if you have any other questions and/or comments. Sadinein Planner II 4209 CR 24.5 Longmont, CO 80504 mmartin@co.weld.co.us PHONE: (720) 652-4210 x 8730 FAX: (720) 652-4211 Please tell us how we're doing: http://www.co.weld.co.us/departments/planning/comp improve comments.cfm From: hammersurveying@comcast.net [mailto:hammersurveying@comcast.net] Sent: Monday, January 26, 2009 10:36 AM To: Michelle Martin Subject: SIGNATURE BLOCKS FOR GLAZE REZONE PLAT Michelle; On the property owner's approval under the notarial certificate after the forgoing instrument was acknowledged before me by, are the owners names printed on these lines? In the Surveyor's Statement do I print my name again under the signature line after the l,? On both the Commissioners certificate and Planning Commission certificate shown it read as describer or described? 1/26/2009 Q O Michelle Martin From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Michelle Martin Friday, January 23, 2009 12:30 PM 'GLAZEMW @vzw.blackberry.net' Linda Glaze; John Barry; Gary Hammer; Thomas Honn RE: CZ -1148 The red line drawings are ready for pick up today but you will need to let me know what time you would like to pick them up because the SW office is closed on Friday's but I can make arrangements to meet you there. If you have any questions regarding the red lines let me know I can always set up a time to go over them with you and/or your surveyor. It was also determined today by the Director Mr. Honn that an appeal of an administrative decision is not required for the cargo containers; therefore you will only need to submit two applications (Site Plan Review and the Variance application for the setback of the cargo containers). Let me know if you have any questions. Michelle Martin Planner II 4209 CR 24.5 Longmont, CO 80504 mmartin@co.weld.co.us PHONE: (720) 652-4210 x 8730 FAX: (720) 652-4211 Please tell us how we're doing: http://www.co.weld.co.us/departments/planning/comp_improve_comments.cfm Original Message From: GLAZEMW@vzw.blackberry.net(mailto:GLAZEMW@vzw.blackberry.net1 Sent: Friday, January 23, 2009 8:23 AM To: Michelle Martin Cc: Linda Glaze; John Barry; Gary Hammer Subject: CZ -1148 Michelle, Can you tell me if the Red Line drawings will be ready today. I believe we have the rest of the SPR application complete. Let me know when they are available for pick up and I will return them to Mr. Hammer ASAP. Thanks. Michael W. Glaze Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry 1 Q Michelle Martin From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: GLAZEMW@vzw.blackberry.net Friday, January 23, 2009 6:15 AM Michelle Martin Linda Glaze; John Barry Building Permits Michelle, Glaze Industrial Properties agrees to acquire any required building permits prior to future construction. Michael W. Glaze Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry Michelle Martin From: Sent: To: Subject: Attachments: email.pdf (25 KB) Michelle Martin Wednesday, January 21, 2009 8:51 AM 'hammersurveying@comcast.net' FW: CZ -1148 email.pdf Michelle Martin Planner II 4209 CR 24.5 Longmont, CO 80504 mmartin@co.weld.co.us PHONE: (720) 652-4210 x 8730 FAX: (720) 652-4211 Please tell us how we're doing: http://www.co.weld.co.us/departments/planning/comp_improve_comments.cfm Original Message From: Michelle Martin Sent: Wednesday,.January 21, 2009 8:49 AM To: 'GLAZEMW@vzw.blackberry.net' Cc: Linda Glaze; John Barry; GarryHammerSurveying@comcast.net; Stephanie Arries; Thomas Honn Subject: RE: CZ -1148 Mr. Glaze, I am sorry if there was a misunderstanding. From this point forward myself or another staff member will take meeting minutes and a copy will be provided to you and the County attorney. To recap Monday's meeting: A signed copy of the Board of County Commissioners (BOCC) resolution will be mailed to you by the Clerk to the Board once the Commissioners have signed the document. You can contact the Clerk to the Board at 970-336-7215 x 4225 with any questions. On Monday (Jan 19, 2009) I emailed a "draft" of the resolution to Mr. Hammer with all the conditions and notes to be added to the plat. This was the same draft copy of the resolution provided to you prior to the BOCC hearing on Dec. 31, 2008. If you would like another draft copy please let me know. Prior to the BOCC hearing you and I discussed the conditions of what would need to be accomplished prior to recording the plat. Mr. Hammer did submit two paper copies of the plat prior to the BOCC hearing in December and I called him right away to let him know the plat did not address the conditions outlined in the "draft" resolution. I told him at that time that before he made all the changes for me to review he should wait until after the BOCC hearing in case their were more changes. The first email I received from Mr. Hammer regarding the plat was on Jan 14, 2009 in which I responded on the same day. I have attached a copy of the email. In December Mr. Hammer and I did not establish the responsibility for who would contact whom after the BOCC hearing. After the BOCC hearing on Dec. 31, 2008 you and I had an informal discussion in the Greeley Planning office regarding the conditions prior to recording the plat. I understood you would be in contact with Mr. Hammer to let him know the outcome of the BOCC hearing. The Department of Planning Services does not normally contact the applicant's surveyor. 1 All correspondence from Mr. Glaze, Mr. Hammer and the County has been documented regarding this case and is a part of the file and is available for public review. All future correspondence will continue to be documented and forward to the County Attorney. Let me know if you have any other comments or questions. I believe we can continue to resolve this matter in a timely manner by May 1, 2009 as you also hope. Michelle Martin Planner II 4209 CR 24.5 Longmont, CO 80504 mmartin@co.weld.co.us PHONE: (720) 652-4210 x 8730 FAX: (720) 652-4211 Please tell us how we're doing: http://www.co.weld.co.us/departments/planning/comp_improve_comments.cfm Original Message From: GLAZEMW@vzw.blackberry.net(mailto:GLAZEMW@vzw.blackberry.net] Sent: Monday, January 19, 2009 3:28 PM To: Michelle Martin Cc: Linda Glaze; John Barry; GarryHammerSurveying@comcast.net Subject: CZ -1148 Michelle, During our meeting this morning you stated that you had sent me a copy of the resolution. I though I had seen it, however, after talking to Linda, I now realize that we did not receive a copy of it. We have not received any correspondence from the County since the beginning of the new year. Could you please forward a copy of it to me. I spoke with Gary Hammer following our meeting this morning. I expressed my concerns to him in regards to the fact that you had not received a copy of the maps indicating the required changes. Gary explained to me that he had dropped the maps off last month prior to the December 31st meeting with the Commissioners. The reason he drew them up early was because I had told him that there should not be any major changes. This was information that you had given me. He went on to tell me that he has made numerous attempts to find out the status of these drawings and to know what changes needed to be made in regards to the final resolution. He also stated that he had just received a copy of the final resolution today. During our meeting you had told me that you had sent him a copy shortly after the Commissioner's meeting. Mr. Hammer has expressed to me that he has had a great amount of difficulty in his dealings with you. He hasindicated to me that it is common practice for most of his customers to experience some of the same difficulties that I am encountering. He also elaborated as to the fact that there always seems to be a curve ball thrown before the application process is finalized. I can only comment about the aforementioned from my own experience; this has not been a pleasurable task. It does not make sense to me as to why it wasn't pointed out to me sooner that my portable storage units was going to be,a problem. After all, the map I submitted almost a year ago clearly illustrates the size and locations of these units. If it was going to be required of me to appear before the Board of Adjustment, looks like I could have done that months ago. As stated in a previous email, I will continue to move forward with this process. I am in complete hopes that this entire nightmare is behind me by the May 1st deadline. If it is not, however I believe the responsibility of delay may fall on more than my shoulders. Michael W. Glaze Sent from my verizon Wireless BlackBerry 2 Page 1 of 1 Michelle Martin From: Michelle Martin Sent: Monday, January 19, 2009 11:12 AM To: Stephanie Arries Cc: Bethany Salzman; John Barry;'GLAZEMW@vzw.blackberry.net' Subject: Glaze Stephanie, I meet with Mr. Glaze this morning to go over all his options in addition to a timeline. Mr. Glaze and I discussed the below timeline in order to meet the May 1, 2009 date. Jan 30, 2009 will have all conditions meet and the plat submitted for recording. Jan 30, 2009 will submit all three application to the Weld County Department of Planning Services (BOA for a variance, BOA for appeal, and SPR) The BOA hearing will be scheduled for an April hearing SPR conditions will be meet and the plat will be ready for recording by May 1, 2009. Let me know if you have any questions. .Atee /' Len Planner II 4209 CR 24.5 Longmont, CO 80504 mmartin@co.weld.co.us PHONE: (720) 652-4210 x 8730 FAX: (720) 652-4211 Please tell us how we're doing: http://www.co.weld.co.us/departments/planning/comp improve comments.cfm 1/19/2009 Q Page I of 2 Michelle Martin \From: Sent: To: Subject: Michelle Martin Monday, January 19, 2009 8:21 AM 'ham mersurveying@comcast.net' RE: GLAZE INDUSTRIAL PROPERTIES CZ -1148 Attachments: Page # 1.tif A copy of the resolution was mailed to Mr. Glaze but I have attached a copy for you. /C�Gciifr .,ion Planner II 4209 CR 24.5 Longmont, CO 80504 mmartin@co.weld.co.us PHONE: (720) 652-4210 x 8730 FAX: (720) 652-4211 Please tell us how we're doing: http://www.co.weld.co.us/departments/planning/comp improve comments.cfm From: hammersurveying@comcast.net[mailto:hammersurveying@comcast.net] Sent: Friday, January 16, 2009 4:30 PM To: Michelle Martin Subject: RE: GLAZE INDUSTRIAL PROPERTIES CZ -1148 So where do I get a copy of this resolution? Are the redline plans I submitted even close or do I need to redraw the whole thing. I just need to know what needs to be done to complete this project and where I can get the information to be able to do that. If you are not the person I need to get this from could you please tell me who I should be talking with. Thank you; Gary Hammer Original message From: Michelle Martin <mmartin@co.weld.co.us> Gary, You will need to submit new plans that adhere to the BOCC resolution. Let me know if you have any questions. SXden/An Planner II 4209 CR 24.5 Longmont, CO 80504 mmartin@co.weld.co.us PHONE: (720) 652-4210 x 8730 FAX: (720) 652-4211 Please tell us how we're doing: 1/21/2009 Q Q Page 2 of 2 http://www.co.weld.co.us/departments/planning/comp improve comments.cfm From: hammersurveying@comcast.net [mailto:hammersurveying@comcast.net] Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2009 4:53 PM To: Michelle Martin Subject: RE: GLAZE INDUSTRIAL PROPERTIES CZ -1148 Michelle; I had sent in redlines of the plat before the Change of Zone meeting will those work or do I need to resubmit? I had made all the corrections I was aware of up to this point. What else do we need to do to complete the submittal. Thank you; Gary Hammer Original message From: Michelle Martin <mmartin@co.weld.co.us> Gary, The BOCC approved the Change of Zone on Dec. 31, 2008 with conditions and development standards. last time we talked you were waiting for the BOCC to approved the case before you made the corrections to the plat. Let me know if you have any other questions. d/74044 d/444n, Planner II 4209 CR 24.5 Longmont, CO 80504 mmartin@co.weld.co.us PHONE: (720) 652-4210 x 8730 FAX: (720) 652-4211 Please tell us how we're doing: http://www.co.weld.co.us/departments/planning/comp improve comments.cfm From: hammersurveying@comcast.net [mailto:hammersurveying@comcast.net] Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2009 3:03 PM To: Michelle Martin Subject: GLAZE INDUSTRIAL PROPERTIES CZ -1148 Michelle; I am not sure where we are at on this submittal? Was I supposed to pick up redlines? I think it has gone to the Commissioners and was approved but I am not sure what is still needed from me. Thanks; Gary Hammer 1/21/2009 Page 1 of 1 Michelle Martin From: Michelle Martin Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2009 3:27 PM To: 'hammersurveying@comcast.net' Subject: RE: GLAZE INDUSTRIAL PROPERTIES CZ -1148 Gary, The BOCC approved the Change of Zone on Dec. 31, 2008 with conditions and development standards. last time we talked you were waiting for the BOCC to approved the case before you made the corrections to the plat. Let me know if you have any other questions. Planner II 4209 CR 24.5 Longmont, CO 80504 mmartin@co.weld.co.us PHONE: (720) 652-4210 x 8730 FAX: (720) 652-4211 Please tell us how we're doing: http://www.co.weld.co.us/departments/planning/comp improve comments.cfm From: hammersurveying@comcast.net[mailto:hammersurveying@comcast.net] Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2009 3:03 PM To: Michelle Martin Subject: GLAZE INDUSTRIAL PROPERTIES CZ -1148 Michelle; I am not sure where we are at on this submittal? Was I supposed to pick up redlines? I think it has gone to the Commissioners and was approved but I am not sure what is still needed from me. Thanks; Gary Hammer 1/21/2009 Michelle Martin From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Michelle Martin Wednesday, January 14, 2009 9:02 AM 'GLAZEMW@vzw.blackberry.net John Barry; Linda Glaze; Bethany Salzman; Stephanie Arries RE: Violation Fine Great. I will see you Monday. Michelle Martin Planner II 4209 CR 24.5 Longmont, CO 80504 mmartin@co.weld.co.us PHONE: (720) 652-4210 x 8730 FAX: (720) 652-4211 Please tell us how we're doing: http://www.co.weld.co.us/departments/planning/comp_improve_comments.cfm Original Message From: GLAZEMW@vzw.blackberry.net [mailto: GLAZEMW@vzw.blackberry.net] Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2009 9:02 AM To: Michelle Martin Cc: John Barry; Linda Glaze Subject: Re: Violation Fine Yes Michelle, I will be at your Longmont office @ 9am on Monday. Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry Original Message From: Michelle Martin <mmartin@co.weld.co.us> Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 08:50:28 To: <GLAZEMW@vzw.blackberry.net> Cc: Stephanie Arries<sarries@co.weld.co.us>; Bethany Salzman<bsalzman@co.weld.co.us>; John Barry<jbarry@wobjlaw.com> Subject: RE: Violation Fine Mike, It appears this week will not work for you because you are out of town; therefore will Monday at 9:00 am work? Michelle Martin Planner II 4209 CR 24.5 Longmont, CO 80504 mmartin@co.weld.co.us PHONE: (720) 652-4210 x 8730 FAX: (720) 652-4211 Please tell us how we're doing: http://www.co.weld.co.us/departments/planning/comp_improve_comments.cfm Original Message From: GLAZEMW@vzw.blackberry.net [mailto: GLAZEMW@vzw.blackberry.net] Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2009 8:26 AM To: Michelle Martin Subject: Re: Violation Fine 1 - Say the time. Original Message From: Michelle Martin To: Michael Glaze Cc: Bethany Salzman Cc: Stephanie Arries Cc: John Barry Subject: RE: Violation Fine Sent: Jan 14, 2009 08:18 Mike, Unfortunately, the only time I have on Friday is from 4:00 -4:30 pm. Do you have anytime on Monday? Michelle Martin Planner II 4209 CR 24.5 Longmont, CO 80504 mmartin@co.weld.co.us PHONE: (720) 652-4210 x 8730 FAX: (720) 652-4211 Please tell us how we're doing: http://www.co.weld.co.us/departments/planning/comp_improve_comments.cfm Original Message From: GLAZEMW@vzw.blackberry.net [mailto: GLAZEMW@vzw.blackberry.net] Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2009 8:09 AM To: Michelle Martin Subject: Re: Violation Fine I'm out of town until late tomorrow. Friday morning will be my soonest availability. Original Message From: Michelle Martin To: Michael Glaze Cc: Linda Glaze Cc: John Barry Cc: Bethany Salzman Cc: Stephanie Arries Subject: RE: Violation Fine Sent: Jan 14, 2009 08:02 Mike, Would you be available to meet with me today or tomorrow to discuss your concerns, options, and timelines regarding your land use cases. I will be at the SW office at 4209 CR 24.5 over the next two days, please let me know what day and times work for you. Michelle Martin Planner II 4209 CR 24.5 Longmont, CO 80504 mmartin@co.weld.co.us PHONE: (720) 652-4210 x 8730 FAX: (720) 652-4211 Please tell us how we're doing: http://www.co.weld.co.us/departments/planning/comp_improve_comments.cfm Original Message From: GLAZEMW@vzw.blackberry.net [mailto: GLAZEMW@vzw.blackberry.net] Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2009 9:48 PM ' To: Michelle Martin Cc: Linda Glaze; John Barry Subject: Violation Fine Michelle, It is respectfully requested that the fine associated with our violation be waived. We are working diligently to resolve all issues and have great hopes to have this entire process behind us in the very near future. Sincerely, Michael W. Glaze Glaze Industrial Properties, LLC Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry Michelle Martin From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: GLAZEMW@vzw.blackberry.net Tuesday, January 13, 2009 9:48 PM Michelle Martin Linda Glaze; John Barry Violation Fine Michelle, It is respectfully requested that the fine associated with our violation be waived. We are working diligently to resolve all issues and have great hopes to have this entire process behind us in the very near future. Sincerely, Michael W. Glaze Glaze Industrial Properties, LLC Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry 1 Q Michelle Martin From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Michelle Martin Tuesday, January 13, 2009 9:07 AM 'GLAZEM W @vzw.blackberry.net' Stephanie Arries RE: Mike, Stephanie Arries is the County Attorney that is handling your case; you can contact her at 970-336-7235 x 4391. If you would like to request the investigation fee waived you can send me the written request and I will forward it to the appropriate party. Let me know if you have any other questions. Michelle Martin Planner II 4209 CR 24.5 Longmont, CO 80504 mmartin@co.weld.co.us PHONE: (720) 652-4210 x 8730 FAX: (720) 652-4211 Please tell us how we're doing: http://www.co.weld.co.us/departments/planning/comp_improve_comments.cfm Original Message From: GLAZEMW@vzw.blackberry.net [mailto:GLAZEMW@vzw.blackberry.net] Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2009 9:06 AM To: Michelle Martin Subject: Re: Michelle, Could you please forward me the county attorneys information so I can discuss the time line with her? Also, do I still need to write a letter requesting the violation fine be waived? If so, who do I address it to? Mike Original Message From: Michelle Martin To: Michael Glaze Cc: Linda Glaze Cc: John Barry Subject: RE: Cost Adjustment Sent: Jan 13, 2009 08:05 Mike, I have forward your request to the appropriate parties, I will let you know the out come of their decision. Michelle Martin Planner II 4209 CR 24.5 Longmont, CO 80504 mmartin@co.weld.co.us PHONE: (720) 652-4210 x 8730 FAX: (720) 652-4211 Please tell us how we're doing:. http://www.co.weld.co.us/departments/planning/comp_improve_comments.cfm 1 S Original Message From: GLAZEMW@vzw.blackberry.net [mailto: GLAZEMW@vzw.blackberry.net] Sent: Monday, January 12, 2009 8:36 PM To: Michelle Martin Cc: Linda Glaze; John Barry Subject: Cost Adjustment Michelle, Per our discussion earlier today, I am in hopes that some consideration could be given to adjusting the cost for my required appearances before the Board of Adjustment. As discussed, the economy has had an adverse affect on virtually all businesses, large and small. Speaking on a personal level, it is very obvious that people are considering their options prior to spending money. We have recently lowered our prices in an attempt to simply create more opportunity for work. The cost for the Board of Adjustment was never considered in the beginning of this process so therefore it was never budgeted for. It is my request that the fees for both Boards of Adjustments be lowered or waived completely. The financial impact of these fees will have an adverse effect that may take months to overcome. Thank you in advance for your consideration for this request. sincerely, Michael W. Glaze Glaze Industrial Properties, LLC Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry O lic eIle Martin From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: GLAZEMW@vzw.blackberry.net Tuesday, January 13, 2009 8:59 AM Michelle Martin Linda Glaze; John Barry Re: Storage Units Michelle, Could you please clarify something for me? When my property became re zoned, if the storage units were a problem, why wasn't it called out then or before then? The old farmhouse that I use for my office does not meet current code requirements for set backs from the road, will I be expected to move it as well? Seems to me that what was on the property when it was re zoned, should be allowed remain without justification. Otherwise where -does it end? Those storage units were on the drawing that was submitted to the commissioners and everyone else up the ladder to view. Doesn't seem very fair that now all of a sudden there's a problem. Please advise me of the County's viewpoint. Thank you. Mike Original Message From: Michelle Martin To: Michael Glaze Cc: Linda Glaze Cc: John Barry Subject: RE: Cost Adjustment Sent: Jan 13, 2009 08:05 Mike, I have forward your request to the appropriate parties, I will let you know the out come of their decision. Michelle Martin Planner II 4209 CR 24.5 Longmont, CO 80504 mmartin@co.weld.co.us PHONE: (720) 652-4210 x 8730 FAX: (720) 652-4211 Please tell us how we're doing: http://www.co.weld.co.us/departments/planning/comp_improve_comments.cfm Original Message From: GLAZEMW@vzw.blackberry.net[mailto:GLAZEMW@vzw.blackberry.net] Sent: Monday, January 12, 2009 8:36 PM To: Michelle Martin Cc: Linda Glaze; John Barry Subject: Cost Adjustment Michelle, Per our discussion earlier today, I am in hopes that some consideration could be given to adjusting the cost for my required appearances before the Board of Adjustment. As discussed, the economy has had an adverse affect on virtually all businesses, large and small. Speaking on a personal level, it is very obvious that people are considering their options prior to spending money. We have recently lowered our prices in an attempt to simply create more opportunity for work. 1 O The cost for the Board of Adjustment was never considered in the beginning of this process so therefore it was never budgeted for. It is my request that the fees for both Boards of Adjustments be lowered or waived completely. The financial impact of these fees will have an adverse effect that may take months to overcome. Thank you in advance for your consideration for this request.' sincerely, Michael W. Glaze Glaze Industrial Properties, LLC Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry O Michelle Martin From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Michelle Martin Tuesday, January 13, 2009 8:05 AM 'GLAZEMW @vzw.blackberry.net' Linda Glaze; John Barry RE: Cost Adjustment Mike, I have forward your request to the appropriate parties, I will let you know the out come of their decision. Michelle Martin Planner II 4209 CR 24.5 Longmont, CO 80504 mmartin@co.weld.Co.us PHONE: (720) 652-4210 x 8730 FAX: (720) 652-4211 Please tell us how we're doing: http://www.co.weld.co.us/departments/planning/comp_improve_comments.cfm Original Message From: GLAZEMW@vzw.blackberry.net(mailto:GLAZEMW@vzw.blackberry.net! Sent: Monday, January 12, 2009 8:36 PM To: Michelle Martin Cc: Linda Glaze; John Barry Subject: Cost Adjustment Michelle, Per our discussion earlier today, I am in hopes that some consideration could be given to adjusting the cost for my required appearances before the Board of Adjustment. As discussed, the economy has had an adverse affect on virtually all businesses, large and small. Speaking on a personal level, it is very obvious that people are considering their options prior to spending money. We have recently lowered our prices in an attempt to simply create more opportunity for work. The cost for the Board of Adjustment was never considered in the beginning of this process so therefore it was never budgeted for. It is my request that the fees for both Boards of Adjustments be lowered or waived completely. The financial impact of these fees will have an adverse effect that may take months to overcome. Thank you in advance for your consideration for this request. sincerely, Michael W. Glaze Glaze Industrial Properties, LLC Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry 1 Q Michelle Martin From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: GLAZEMW@vzw.blackberry.net Tuesday, January 13, 2009 8:02 PM • Stephanie Arries John Barry; Michelle. Martin; Linda Glaze CZ -1148 Ms. Arries, It appears that I will possibility be required to make two separate appearances before the Board of Adjustment. This development occurred during a meeting at a planning meeting last Friday. I am unsure of the timing restrictions or if they will have an impact on my deadline. This seemed to be a concern during the meeting last week. Nevertheless, it is my intent to make you aware of this potential for delay. Sincerely, Michael W. Glaze Glaze Industrial Properties, LLC Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry 1 Q Michelle Martin From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Michelle,. GLAZEMW@vzw.blackberry.net Monday, January 12, 2009 8:36 PM Michelle Martin Linda Glaze; John Barry Cost Adjustment Per our discussion earlier today, I am in hopes that some consideration could be given to adjusting the cost for my required appearances before the Board of Adjustment. As discussed, the economy has had an adverse affect on virtually all businesses, large and small. Speaking on a personal level, it is very obvious that people are considering their options prior to spending money. We have recently lowered our prices in an attempt to simply create more opportunity for work. The cost for the Board of Adjustment was never considered in the beginning of this process so therefore it was never budgeted for. It is my request that the fees for both Boards of Adjustments be lowered or waived completely. The financial impact of these fees will have an adverse effect that may take months to overcome. Thank you in advance for your consideration for this request. sincerely, Michael W. Glaze Glaze Industrial Properties, LLC Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry 1 Michelle Martin From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: GLAZEMW@vzw.blackberrY.net Sunday, January 11, 2009 7:15 PM Michelle Martin Linda Glaze; John Barry Storage Cans Michelle, I took a few minutes this weekend and drove around the local area. Without traveling more than five miles from the front door of my shop I found three businesses with the same type of storage cans that I have. None of them met the property line set backs that was stated I must meet. One of these businesses currently uses these cans as a form of income. My point here is why am I being required to meet certain county guidelines while it appears that other companies in the neighborhood doesn't. During the meeting Friday, it seemed that the priority of this entire process is to meet a deadline that you're office created. It doesn't however seem to matter to anyone there how much all this extra effort is costing me. In fact it was mentioned that an fine of $500.00 has been imposed because I'm not working fast enough to the County's liking. What I'm failing to see is any concern as to the disruption this entire process or the expense this has cost me. Now I'm seeing that what is being demanded of me is not being required around me. Maybe there is a reasonable explanation. If so.I'll look forward to hearing it. Nevertheless, this entire process has made me question as to who's best interest it is in. During the meeting Friday, no one could answer why a business was allowed to operate in my location for decades without the proper zoning. Now all of a sudden its a priority. I will continue to work diligently with your office to resolve any problems with my property that may exist. I am not however interested in spending any more money than I should have to. I will await an explanation from the appropriate office in regards to my aforementioned concerns. sincerely, Michael W. Glaze Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry 1 Michelle Martin From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: GLAZEM W @vzw.blackberry:net Monday, January 05, 2009 3:12 PM Michelle Martin Linda Glaze CZ -1148 Ms. Martin, This property is currently leased to plumbing company that specializes in service work. This company has approximately six trucks that are utilized for various reasons. Their hours of operation are from 6am to 5pm Monday through Friday. They sometimes work weekends and evenings when required. Their vehicles are professionally maintained and all work of that nature is outsourced off site. Their office is actually mobile with the phone being forwarded to the owner at all times. The old farm house is used for making copies of paper work. Although it was converted to office space during a previous owners occupation, it is my understanding that the proper permits were never acquired. No employees occupy the office space. There is a copy and a fax machine. No customers utilize this space nor is there any other kind of traffic in or out. It is however their intent to someday utilize this space as office space. Therefore, whatever modifications that need to take place, we will certainly address. sincerely, MWG Sent from my Verizon Wireless B1ackBerry 1 Michelle Martin From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: GLAZEMW@vzw.blackberry.net Monday, January 05, 2009 2:33 PM Frank Piacentino Linda Glaze; Michelle Martin Re: CZ -1148 /Change of use permits I guess I'm not completely clear on what requires a permit and what doesn't. The remodeled house has absolutely no closets in it whatsoever. The pole barn has an old muffler shop sign still on it from a previous owner operating from there. It seems that this property has been used commercially for the last several decades. Nevertheless, it is my goal to acquire all of the necessary permits and proper zoning requirements. If someone has gotten by with something in the past, it is not our desire to continue that tradition. Where and when do I need to apply for the permits the County requires me to obtain? Please advise. MWG Original Message From: Frank Piacentino To: Michael Glaze Cc: Michelle Martin Subject: CZ -1148 /Change of use permits Sent: Jan 5, 2009 13:56 Ref: CZ -1148, Parcel 1471 20 000030 Michael, In response to your e-mail to Michelle Martin, dated January 5, 2009 There were three historical building permits drawn for this parcel in 2005. 1. BCS-050585 was for a remodel of an existing home, there is no reference to a change for office uses. 2. BCS-050584 was for replacing roof trusses on a 480 sq ft garage. 3. BCS-050583 was to replace a unit heater in a pole frame building. I find no permits for changes of use for this parcel. If these buildings are too used for commercial uses, they will require a change of use permit. If you have.any question pleases call. Frank Piacentino Plans Examiner Weld County Building Inspection 720- 652-4210 ext.8736 4209 Cr 24.5 Longmont Co. Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry 1 © Michelle Martin From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: GLAZEMW@vzw.blackberry.net Monday, January 05, 2009 9:48 AM Michelle Martin Linda Glaze CZ -1148 Ms. Martin, In regards to the City of Brighton's Referral Response, dated August 07, 2008, it is possible that pertinent information was omitted from our application. We failed.to communicate that an I-3 zoning was needed to facilitate our outside fuel storage needs. This information would have assisted the City of Brighton in making a decision more suited to meet the needs of our application. We apologize for not being more informative on our application. We will strive to prevent this sort of avoidable mishap from taking place again. Sincerely, Michael W. Glaze Glaze Industrial Properties, LLC Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry 1 Michelle Martin From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Ms Martin, GLAZEMW@vzw.blackberry.net Monday, January 05, 2009 9:02 AM Michelle Martin Linda Glaze CZ -1148 There are currently three structures on our property. • A 1000 square foot house that was converted to office space by the previous owner. All work was inspected by the Weld County Building Inspectors Office. • A 2400 square foot shop building that was refurbished by the previous owner and again inspected by Weld County. • A 350 square foot cinder block garage that was reconditioned and inspected under the previous owner's permit. Glaze Industrial Properties has no intent of adding structures or modifying the ones that currently exist. Since all three of these existing structures were reconditioned under the required permit by the previous owner, it is our hopes any changes would be minimal. Sincerely, Michael W. Glaze Glaze Industrial Properties, LLC Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry 1 Hello