HomeMy WebLinkAbout780234.tiff • .,
o oN
N a
We
S/ '603 $ 'M'S J^ 3N17 1 SV3 "e
,b/Z££ MS0,-91.00 S `mod;
1�9Z—+� w. AJYB 13S • ,4 .%r
j?I'
: •
°Pu I I ca 4E Eb 4 $I i'
`O _ I Jtl 0%Q lot y
GAR GI W Yy ? E
k-9S ,9�—� Qe 0 �� A in m f.'" 'e
N--26'9 N. r Y Yi F�-. T }g -.L N€ o La.'
i.!
.o N - 8t . c. n o k.• c r t o 1 O I ` ` 7- -1 e I ` 429 0 j;Z NC V . o° W V i °VocCd 4
r ,n w N ey�s
Ca'
2 I h G ' V 6 `I
W I V
mR ,°o =E a u W
Q '---- --- - yiln S 3� P `t
QK O A O E aS4o
.? p ppR :; n3,i`�.'' an U .. Z .o t, _ c_ t
vFJ.L. •E
•q 9 a � s C.
{0 i c s du-LE e
cc c•
•
z '4. J o E 4
3 I• . j s7 :i . �" bo I C N 3 0;El;3 a .a_
Y i 03 6 V 3
t t� - 'y;aa` ! i °� a x0 of " e 3 •
a i R E- e' k .i sk. g?:`aial la- ,;o s GW h S 'N ,.o�
° +r ; 4- t se's z ii'ai sr,'Sn;e24..I .a .-;,t,, o..E>i°P
JL.3. C U 7532.'4: 5:`) .,1c%.-„ YVCV)
as—
;,ii :i".S;51 3E -, ."dl,to55:I1 Veco V CG.Q46
Z N . m t
,. -. .. ., .. .. a { .J ar'Er c
, r I J o o
2 o I n u �>
c
Ot O L '^o
L-
c W _ b 'c e o
/ F 4 u '$-� in Ch
VJa w c �4, —re
Q a.
2 W'n .` za E
�Oz `s , e o +_°
Z2 g,?, j 3 . -o '
V �� u . • r x... La 22'
a. K°- . c� + ° o.e
c j k41, e V a RS a
i zn v do
zJ a v J
w -• ° S
F-- C� ¢ ,° N h VIZ n r. F.
Cn OZ•o N Q ° V N^"
n Dodo o ' °
Ll. ,,,,-3
.
ZOO r F m ° c •
o
0
- u i °
N + oar c "`^r d
H V L a
CD
Q °r r ,17.� ,-Y id mV+
g - -° t3 sc a qq++3 L 6'
t C°C-`e 9.Y-o S a m e V d �3 d 5+ u o '- lfl Zd
3 ° + N s.P G V ♦V V� Z
r £ ar °..art Nyh ° m os .t a � _ O .. W
✓ t i t a G Y.•J Y W- o ttLcc2 -t U' N , S O r J:� �I�
cr. • 3a_
L J A.e s ° 3 m o u u a a w o mom• s r sir ��
3 dwell C =u 4l
a L 0 i °�W Q) J Q�.' Y ow,—-w '.p`r m c w ` �c
F.�tr ° info u n we'',r ei N1yoI •m� 5, 01
o' "° 1 En
J°' -i„-1.+ „c-,-, ;f*y ?m Z d Yy • O N = " J
' °Y.t• a ut.-E of ; 8o--n-con ?,-.- h 3 N-O QS n 'EC
a
4.- .Jai i r o i CO
L d u 0.4. J - Eaa
co.
op
e 518'3 j 'o r °4.1 N o a %; 0'a o o y Ft 4-
- c o
'X q'E#Tn f � my + ;�u--� ,yu � s a - _ n 17A11 UO IN I
<�•3aVowsc F� ai3`+urf as.-.4'- o. N i_�
NOltd/BOS30 1 037 ^. wad
7C . CILIM . . ` 4�_=
RESOLUTI ON
RE: APPROVAL OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 33 :78 : 2 FOR PASTOR
RESIDENCE AND CHURCH SANCTUARY ON A TRACT OF LAND LOCATED
IN SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 6 NORTH, RANGE 67 WEST OF THE 6TH
P.M. , WELD COUNTY, COLORADO
WHEREAS , the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County,
Colorado, pursuant to Colorado statute and the Weld County Home
Rule Charter, is vested with the authority of administering the
affairs of Weld County, Colorado, and
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County,
Colorado held a public hearing on the 9th day of August, 1978
at the hour of 9 : 00 o 'clock a.m. for the purpose of hearing the
application of the First Baptist Church of Windsor for the
granting of a Conditional Use Permit for a pastor residence and
church santuary on the following described real estate, to-wit:
A tract of land located in Southwest Quarter (SA)
of Section 15, Township 6 North, Range 67 West
of the Sixth Principal Meridian, Weld County,
Colorado and being more particularly described
as follows:
Commencing at the South Quarter Corner (SaCor) of
said Section 15, and considering East Line of
Southwest Quarter (SWQ) to bear North 00°36'23"
East with all bearing contained herein being
relative thereto:
Thence North 00`36'23" Fast, along East Lire of
the Southwest Quarter (SWQ) of said Section
15, 93.34 feet to the True Point of Beginning;
Thence South 89°33'00" West, along the North
Right-of-Way Line of Colorado State Highway
No. 392, 424.17 feet;
Thence North 51°53'25" East, along the South
Right-of-way Line of Great Western Railroad
543.53 feet;
Thence South 00°36'23" West, along East Line
of the Southwest Quar er (SE4) of said Section
15, 332.14 feet to the True Point of Beginning.
Said tract of land contains 1.617 acres.
WHEREAS, evidence was presented in support of the grant of
the Conditional Use Permit for pastor residence and church
santuary, and
WHEREAS, Section 3 . 3 .D. of the Weld County Zoning Resolution
authorizes such a use in an Agricultural District on the grant of
a Conditional Use Permit by the Board of County Commissioners , and
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County,
Colorado, heard all the testimony and statements of those present,
has studied the request of the petitioner and the recommendations
of the Weld County Planning Commission and all of the exhibits
/pH ii/421
PL0576
780234
and evidence presented in this matter, and having been fully
informed and satisfied that the request for a Conditional Use
Permit for pastor residence and church sanctuary on the herein-
above described real estate, complies with all of the conditions
as set out in Section 3 .3 .D. (2) of the Weld County Zoning
Resolution;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Com-
missioners of Weld County, Colorado, that the application of
the First Baptist Church of Windsor for a Conditional Use Permit
for pastor residence and church sanctuary on the hereinabove
described tract of land, be, and hereby is, granted, subject to
the development standards contained in the Conditional Use Permit.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners
of Weld County, Colorado, that the reasons for apporval contained
in the Planning Commission Recommendations dated August 1, 1978
be, and hereby are, incorporated as the findings of fact of the
Board of County Commissioners in this matter.
The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made
and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the 9th day of
August, A.D. , 1978.
4_ 0, BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
ATTEST: '.. .., I..: (?,(7atiz.l.-"/
WELD COUNTY, COLORADO
W County Clerk and Recorder /� �
(nd erk to the B '�� 2 � —
)3-X; ep � County lerk
�' ��/1 1� -/JZ�1 ,
� � rk �/ b�tz«i it 01 7Eer�.
APPROVED TO FORM:.
County Attorney
Assistant
Date Presented: August 14, 1978
RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL-305' (plus postage)
SENT TO POSTMARK
1st Baptist Church of Windsor OR DATE
T - sTREEf Arbewry Bird
r--I P.O. BOX 123
6) P.O., STATE AND ZIP CODE
CO Windsor CO 80550 8/15/78
CID ___ OPTIONAL SERVICES FOR ADDITIONAL FEESLn _
RETURN ii 1. Shows to whom and date delivered 154
RECEIPT With delivery to addressee only 650
2. Shows to whom,date and where delivered 354
SERVICES With delivery to addressee only 854
_ DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY 504_
d SPECIAL DELIVERY (eMra fee required)
Z PS Form 3800 NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED— (See other side)
Apr. 1971 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL
*GPO:IBTS O-460-443
a • SENDER: Complete items I.2,and 5.
V Add your addressin the "RETURN TO" space on
a terms.
M I. The following service is requested(check one).
r O Slaw to whom and date delivered 251
IO Show to whom,date,&address of delivery 451
5 O RESTRICTED DELIVERY.
Show to whom and date delivered 850
❑ RESTRICTED DELIVERY..
Show to whom,date,and address of delivery..$1.05
(Fees shown are in addition to'garage charges and other
fees).
ii 2. ARTICLE ADDRESSED TO: ,
g
1st Baptist Church of Windsor
i % Terry Bird
8/14 . CUP
I( J. ARTICLE DESCRIPTION:
REGISTERED NO. CERTIFIED NO. INSURED NO.
1 563914
(Always obtain signature aaddresseaddressesor seat)
1 I have received the article described above.
SIGN3tE 0 Addressee .O Authorized agent
i
eeFl a. N lit�t
O DELIVERY POSTMARK
JJJ Rr Co
a5. ADDRESS pmts eMy K requested). .J%'c
� R
8 6. UNABLE TO DELIVER BECAUlte
E .
R
It GOP:nw0-203-451
BEFORE THL GELD COUNTY, COLORADO PLANNING t MISSION
RESOLUTION OF RECOMMENDATION TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Case No. CUP # 33 . 78-2 Date August 1 1978
APPLICATION OF Terry Bird/First Baptist Church of Windsor
ADDRESS P.O. Box 123, Windsor, Colorado 80550
Moved by Irma White that the following resolution be introduced
for passage by the Weld County Planning Commission:
Be it Resolved by the Weld County Planning Commission that the
application for Church
covering the following described property in Weld County,
Colorado, to-wit:
See attached
with Development Standards
be recommended (favorably)/ (unfavorably) to the Board of County
Commissioners for the following reasons:
1, The request is in conformance with the Weld County Comprehensive
Plan in that the new church is located within the Comprehensive
Plan area of the Town of Windsor and compatible with the future
land use of that municipality.
2. It is the opinion of the Planning Commission that this request is
in compliance with the provisions of Section 3. 3.D02 . and 3. of
the Weld County Zoning Resolution which states :
Motion seconded by Ben Nix
Vote: For Passage Chuck Carlson Against Passage
Bette Kountz
Ben Nix
Irma White
Frank Suckla
Jerry Kiefer _ ------
Percy Hiatt
The Chairman declared the Resolution passed and ordered that a certified copy
be forwarded with the file of this case to the Board of County Commissioners
for further proceedings.
Terry Bird/First Bapt_.t Church of Windsor
CUP-33 :78 :2
P.C. RECOMMENDATION
August 1, 1978
"The Planning Commission and the Board of County
Commissioners shall consider the following in making
their determination in approving or denying a con-
ditional use permit : Compatibility with the
surrounding area, harmony with the character of the
neighborhood and existing agricultural uses in the
area, need for the proposed use , its effect upon
the immediate area, its effect on future development
of the area, and the health, safety and welfare of
the inhabitants of the area and the County. Before
a permit for a conditional use permit is issued, the
Planning Commission and the Board of County
Commissioners shall determine through hearings, that
the following plans, methods and studies, which shall
accompany the application for a conditional use
permit , provide adequate protection of the health,
safety and welfare of the inhabitants of the area
and the county. "
This determination is based upon the following:
A. The proposed Development Standards for the Conditional Use
Permit will provide for the adequate protection of the
health, safety and welfare of the inhabitants of the area
and the county.
B. The Windsor/Severance Fire Protection District has set forth
no objections to this request .
C. The Weld County Engineering Department has set forth no
objections to this request .
D. The Town of Windsor Planning Commission has recommended
approval of this request .
E. The applicant has submitted a petition with the signatures
of three surrounding property owners located within 500'
of the subject property who are in favor of this request.
The Planning Commission recommendation for approval is conditional upon
the following :
1. The Conditional Use Permit plan being amended to:
a. Indicate the reservation or dedication of an additional
12 feet of right-of-way along the north side of State
Highway 392.
b. The existing access being relocated to the eastern
edge of the property. The access should be a minimum
distance of 10 feet from the eastern property line.
Terry Bird/First Baptist Church of Windsor
CUP-33 :78:2
P.C. RECOMMENDATION
August 1, 1978
These items were requested by the Colorado Division of
Highways in a letter dated March 31, 1978.
c. Delete the drainage area as shown on the plan.
Drainage of the property shall be in accordance with
the revised drainage materials submitted by the
applicant on June 29, 1978.
2. The attached Development Standards being recommended and
adopted for the Conditional Use Permit area.
3. No building or electrical permits for the church building
shall be issued on the Conditional Use Permit area until
the Development Standards for the Conditional Use Permit
have been placed on the Conditional Use Permit plat and
said plat has been delivered to the Department of Planning
Services office .
CRRTIFICATION Of COPY
1 , Shirley A. Phillips ___, Recording Secretary of the Weld County
Planning Commission , do hereby certify that the above and foregoing
Resolution is a true copy of the Resolution of the Manning Commission
of Weld County , Colorado , adopted on August I 197& __ and re -
corded in Book No . VI _ of the proceedings of the said Planning
Commission .
Dated the 3 day of __August___._ 19 9 ._7.8..
Secretary k
W ' l ) n* 1-3k CI Won \ 5 To 0, 5h, p (c 440I1t) , crinnty., w ]
tt I Ll� , . ,r , A , t ,l ,X; I \ l . !r..'tl '"/ iLoAoritdo
J ( X 1 l Y � 111. "���
"Id LC- t " �� 11vrr (` poor t• 4i a `, C`ttt"i oc, C01\ows;
t ..SOU , ( ° n t der C o1 %\ej
C OYY\Lr1rYl (. 10 � �� I 1 � � 1
tiJ ��cf Cc( ) 0' :-, _1Ill it_ ' i I rr t `� �IY\C� :,: r ' (31 ;\'. 11 , ( \3
EcAs1 Lime e4 , tt, wre5t ( ,girlt r ( 5V1 1i )
tecir. Nc,r h1 cc° 3(, ) 3" C( ‘A -k gallbun' oleks
Gc., kcr h 1 %-ii cf.A c % C, I<t1tv . 1wc: t : is '.
i1 V Yl'- t l (iY f '/, ODc 3 (0 _) [ 1 `J, { i ! ,'\ , Ens '
rL v w (_c' y.) � k': w' � W 74 ) 04:
y i5 t 3 . ?) 4 = t. .r l- f
W }�otrl � of t � c�,t , IFv � , :� • Tl.) ,t, Iv \. , , '3U
I
), r
U, e5t, r tl0t\ AA ) c Nov i � � �1.�� , . � . Lrrlhf
E Ccicr :'rcl o J"Rtit f: li i (Vh 'vP-N7 Ur:).
I
5o0illl R r ,• , Ltp• c. r, 1-7 to V\,€ 5ie
1'( ),,A Y C' r 1 c i 3 -1 ≥ . 3 -2) � �. 1
1 A41c' I� (. Lc15i-
i �, F- . ,
L 1 ht 44 , ( O4 4) ( 11.\) U 1 C 4" f. S lki)
C f. _-)(1 ' A5 3 f�. . Iii ¶ ec 4 its tl (',
Ty u C Pe t1' \' riI-),
yy , I 1 11 r ;
'Z7
(\ l-\l '.-' (C .3r ltil
•
First Baptist Church of Windsor
CUP
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
1 . The permitted uses on the her-eon described property shall be
the church and all other uses permitted by right in Section
3. 3B of the Weld County Zoning Resolution .
2. The single family residence may be used as a temporary sanctuary
for worship.
3. The Conditional Use Permit area shall he maintained in such a
manner so as to prevent -soil erosion , fugitive dust , and the
growth of noxious weeds .
4 . All parking shall be provided on-site. No parking shall be
allowed over any leach field area.
B. All accesses to the property shall have the approval of the
Colorado Division of Highways . All accesses shall be constructed
in accordance with recommendations and/or requirements of the
Colorado Division of Highways .
6. All sewage disposal -facilities shall comply with County and -State
Health Standards and Regulations .
7. Prior to construction of the church building , a soil engineering
test shall be conducted to determine proper footing design in
accordance with the Weld County Building Code .
8. A sign with dimensions as shown hereon may be erected on the
property.
9. No permanent structures , signs , or landscaping shrubbery shall
be permitted in the 12 foot right-of—way reservation or
dedication along the north side of State Highway 392 .
10. The Conditional Use Permit shall be limited to the plans shown
hereon and governed by the Development Standards stated above
and all applicable Weld County Regulations. Any material
deviations from the plans and/or Development Standards as shown
or -stated above shall require the approval of another Conditional
Use hermit before such changes shall be permitted . Any other
changes from the plans and/or Development Standards shall be
filed in the Office of the Department of Planning Services .
Comments :
1. The Weld County Health Department in a letter dated April 6 ,
1978 , and the West Greeley Soil Conservation District in a
letter dated April 17 , 1978 , have raised concerns with this
request . These concerns have been addressed in the
Development Standards.
•
2 . Our office has received one letter from Helen Miller , a
surrounding property owner , indicating she is opposed to this
request . (A copy is included in the -attached packet ) . Mrs.
Miller' s signature also appears on the petition supporting
the approval of this request .
S •
The Weld County Planning Commission held a scheduled meeting on August
1, 1978, at 1 :30 p.m. in the Weld County Centennial Center County
Commissioners Hearing Room, first floor, 915 10th Street , Greeley, Colorac
Roll Call was as follows:
Chuck Carlson • Present
Ben Nix •
Present
Percy Hiatt Present
Jerry Kiefer Present
Frank Suckla Present
Bette Kountz Present
Irma White Present
Also present were : Gary Z. Fortner, Director of .Planning
Tom Bonn , Zoning Administrator
Chuck Cunliffe, Assistant Zoning Administrator
Kay Norton, Assistant County Attorney
As a .quorum was present , the meeting proceeded as scheduled. The
minutes of the July 18, 1978, meeting were unanimously. approved.
APPLICANT': Flatiron Paving Company
CASE NUMBER: SUP-365:78 :16
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: SEt NEI, Section 30, and SW4 NW , Section 29,
T2N, R68W
LOCATION: fl miles north and 1 mile east of Erie
SUBJECT: Addition of Asphalt Plant and ,a Concrete Batch Plant Amending
SUP-260
APPEARANCE : Ed McDowell and Mike Hart
DISCUSSION: This application was continued from the Planning Commission
meeting on July 18, 1978, for any further information to he presented.
There was concern at the last meeting regarding compatibility with the
surrounding area. HIlichael Hart stated in this regard that there is a
parcel of land on the south side of Road 16 and on the west side of
Boulder Creek that is zoned Indust : ial . There was also concern about
the potential impact of the mining operation and the difference of the
impacts regarding air quality of the area. Dr. George McVeel then gave
an extensive report of his investigation of the air quality as it now
exists in the area and what the effects would be of the sand and gravel
alone. He stated that as the operation exists now the air quality -is
relatively good at the present time with the exception of some
particulate matter such as dust and small amounts of other pollutants
from oil and gas wells in the area and from automobiles . The impacts
of the sand and gravel operation alone will produce some particulate
matter as will the asphalt and concrete plant . lie stated that the
impacts will be small in the long-run and on the average there will
actually be a reduction of the amount of particular released into the
air. Discussion followed regarding how many employees would be involved
with the operation . There will be approximately 15 persons involved
according to Ed McDowell . Mr. Kiefer asked if the material mined five
miles upstream isbrought to the plant or will the asphalt and concrete
plant use only the material that is on site. Mr. McDowell stated
that the material is hauled back to Boulder and is processed further
upstream i.n an asphalt plant there and used in Boulder. The concrete
plant in Boulder presently has its own source of material where it is
located. No material from these sites would be hauled to the proposed .
Planning Commissioeinutes •
Page 2
August: 1, 1978
plants and would be very uneconomical . Discussion followed where the
majority of the material will be processed. Tom Bauer then expressed,
his opposition to the proposal by stating that the non-particulate
emissions would be trapped because the proposal is in a valley and
there would also be an increase of carbon monoxide and hydrocarbons
because of the increased traffic and dust . Helen Bryant stated that
her father owned the property that is zoned industrial and had no
intention of having an industrial operation on the land. At this time
the slide presentation was again shown for the benefit of Mrs. Kountz
that was prepared by surrounding property owners opposed to the proposal.
Mrs. Kountz was not present for the previous Planning Commission hearing.
Other persons expressing opposition because of incompatibility with
the area, dust , noise, and pollution included: Ken Neuens , Dale and
Lynn Johnson , John True, Mike Shaw, Carol Bultaup, Howard Rasmussen ,
Sandy True, Mrs. Saudee and Doris Saudee . Lucy Stromquist , also a
, surrounding property owner, was concerned about the possible decrease
of food production and Helen Nelson read some statistics which stated
that there is 4* miles of surrounding property of which 1. 75 .miles and
410 acres represent those opposing the site and 2* miles and 960 acres .
which represent those who have no objection to the proposal . Mr. Nix
raised the concern of the possible conflict of interest in knowing
Mr. Milton Nelson . No member on the Board felt it necessary for Mr.
Nix to abstain from voting. Tom Honn then read the conditions that
were to be subject to the staff 's recommendation into the record.
Chairman Carlson asked for clarification as to whether it was County
Road 3 or 3*: . Tom Honn stated that the memo from the County Engineer' s
Office refers to it as County Road 3. Discussion followed regarding
alternate routes. It was decided the County Commissioners should make
this final decision .
MOTION: Be it therefore resolved to recommend approval with the
Development Standards using County Road 3 as the alternate route to
the Board of County Commissioners with the County Commissioners to make
the final decision regarding alternate routes. Motion by Frank Suckla,
seconded by Ben Nix. A vote of "aye" was cast by Chuck Carlson , Ben
Nix, Frank Suckla, Percy '; iatL and Bette Kountz. A vote of "no" was
cast by Jerry Kiefer and Irma White. Motion carried 5 'to 2. Each
member was then requested by John Houtchens regarding clarification of
why each Planning Commission member voted the way they did which each
member did as requested.
APPLICANT : Charles Hobday
CASE NUMBER: Z-304 : 78:8
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: E}- E* NE*, Section 6; Pt . SE*, Section 20, and
Pt . E-, Section 31, T2N, R65W
LOCATION : 2* miles' west of Hudson
SUBJECT : Change of Zone from "A" Agricultural to "B" Business District
APPEARANCE : Don Drawer
• DISCUSSION: This application was tabled from the Planning Commission
meeting on July 5 , 1978, for a field trip and further information
regarding the history of what has occurred to date. Chuck Cunliffe
also brought the Planning Commission up-to-date as to what has occurred
Planning CommissiSiinutes I •
Page 3
August 1, 1978
to date. Discussion followed regarding what had happened at various
points of time. Mr. Kiefer asked if there was a time table at all.
Mr. Drawer responded there was not . Mrs. White stated she was not
convinced the proposal was feasible with no water and no assurance it
will be carried out . Mr. Kiefer asked if there was a certain time table
to carry this out and have everything in order. Mr. Drawer responded
there was not . Mr. Drawer also commented in regard to the staff ' s•
recommendation that he felt this would be of benefit to the county.
Also stated that Mr. and Mrs. Earl Riley were opposed to this because
they thought County Road 16 would be an access road, but Mr. Drawer
assured them they do not want it to be an access.
MOTION: Be it therefore resolved to deny the application based on the
staff ' s recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners with the
deletion of the last quoted paragraph and Reason ##'2 of the staff' s
recommendation and the last sentence of the recommendation. Motion by
. Ben Nix, 'seconded by Irma White. A vote of "aye" was cast by Chuck
Carlson , Ben Nix, Frank Suckla, Jerry Kiefer, Percy Hiatt , Bette
Kountz, and Irma White. Motion carried.
APPLICANT: Erie Water and Sanitation District
CASE NUMBER: SUP-367: 78: 19
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Pt. SE4 NW*, Section 6, T1N, R68W
LOCATION: 11 miles north of Erie
SUBJECT: Wastewater Treatment Plant
APPEARANCE: Keith Bell
DISCUSSION: This proposal is to serve the community of Erie and is
designed to accommodate the anticipated future growth of Erie and to
meet the effluent standards of the Weld County Health Department , the
Colorado Department of Health and the EPA. The plant will employ a
maximum of three persons. The noise level will be relatively low for
the type of equipment which will be used and will be housed within the
building. The activated sludge process is being utilized to minimize
odors. There will be some odor, but will be very slight . This
particular sight was chosen because of gravity flow, is not subject to
flooding, is isolated from housing , and is down wind of prevailing
winds. Discussion then followed regarding the selection of the site .
Tom Honn read the staff' s recommendation to continue the hearing to
August 15, 1978. Chairman Carlson then calledfor comments from the
audience. At this time Virginia Thurman asked who will be served if :
the proposal is granted and requested more information regarding the
odor. Joyce Rees expressed concern regarding the potential for
flooding, and also stated that she had received a letter from the Town
Clerk of Erie which stated there was gravel at the site. Mr. Bell
later commented there was no gravel at all at this site. Carol Bulthaup
expressed concern with odor, Shirley Koch expressed concern about
flooding as did Russell Rees. Mr. Bell stated that the 500, 000 per gallo:
per day plant will serve a population equivalent of 5, 000 people.
However, this is approximate because the water will also serve industrial
uses , schools , restaurants, etc. Discussion followed regarding the
configuration of the land and the number of houses invovled along
Colorado 52. No further discussion.
Planning Commissio linutes •
Page 4
August 1 , 1978
MOTION: Be it therefore resolved to continue the meeting to August 15 ,
1978 , based on the staff 's recommendation. Motion by Jerry Kiefer,
seconded by Irma White. A vote of "aye" was cast by Chuck Carlson,
Ben Nix, Frank Suckla, Jerry Kiefer, Percy Hiatt, Bette Kountz, and
Irma :White. Motion carried.
APPLICANT: Terry Bird
CASE NUMBER: CUP-33 : 78 :2
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Pt . SW , Sectionl5, T6N, R67W
LOCATION: fr mile east of Windsor on the north side of Colo. Highway 52
SUBJECT: Church
APPEARANCE: Terry Bird
DISCUSSION: This proposal is for a church and a residence on the site.
Mr. Bird explained that the residence will be used for temporary worship
for approximately one year and then if they have adequate membership a
sanctuary will be built on the south side of the residence. The
residence now is almost complete with the exception of inside work yet
to be done. The ground around the home has been raised to 24" with
adequate drainage for irrigation water and surface water onto a tile
covered area south of the location .. There being no questions at this
time, Chuck Cunliffe read the staff's recommendation for approval and
the Development Standards. Chuck Carlson asked what septic system
would be used. Chuck Cunliffe responded it would be an engineering
designed system designed with the approval of the Weld County Health
Department . John Hall confirmed this by stating that the system is an
evapotranspiration sealed system and has been approved by the Weld
County Health Department . Mr. Nix expressed concern with how close the
water table was to the surface. Mr. Bird responded it was about 4 feet.
No further discussion .
MOTION: Be it therefore resolved to recommend approval based on the
staff ' s recommendation with the Development Standards to the Board of
County Commissioners . Motion by Irma White , seconded by Ben Nix. A
vote of "aye" was cast by Chuck Carlson , Ben Nix, Frank Suckla, Jerry
Kiefer, Percy Hiatt , Bette Kountz, and Irma White. Motion carried.
APPLICANT: Roger Vermeer
CASE NUMBER: SUP-366 :78 : 18
LEGAL DESCRIPTION : Pt . NW$, Section 6, T8N, R67W
LOCATION:. 8 miles west of Nunn adjacent to Larimer County Line
SUBJECT: Hog Operation
APPEARANCE: Roger Vermeer
DISCUSSION: Mr. Vermeer stated that he presently owns a hog operation
in Minnesota and has been looking for some time to find an area more
conducive to raising hogs than Minnesota as Minnestota gets a lot of snow
and approximately six months of winter. They have now found this area
which is suited to their operation and situation and is relatively
isolated. 51 acres are involved and will probably be for feeder pigs
only. unless there is a demond for finishing them. 200 sows are presently
proposed. There is a well on the property and a permit for a second
well has been received. There being no questions or comments at this
time, Chuck Cunliffe read the staff ' s recommendation for approval With till
Development Standards. No further discussion .
MOTION:' Be it therefore resolved to recommend approvn1 with the Develop-
ment Standards to the Board of County Commissioner n the staff ' s
recommenil. tion. Motion by Percy Hiatt , seconddfl v Jerry Kiefer. A vote
Planning Commissioiinutes •
Page 5
August 1, 1978
of "aye" was cast by Chuck Carlson, Ben Nix, Frank Suckla, Jerry Kiefer,
Percy Hiatt , and Bette Kountz. Motion carried.
APPLICANT : James Bishop
CASE NUMBER: S-138 : 77: 11
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Pt . SEtj Section 30, T3N, R68W
LOCATION: 3 miles south and 2 miles west of Mead immediately north
of Union Reservoir (Calkins Lake)
SUBJECT: Final Plat - Calkins Lake Subdivision
APPEARANCE : • James Bishop
DISCUSSION: This proposal was begun approximately one year ago to create
six 2 to 3 acre sites facing the lake. Longs Peak had given Mr. Bishop
a water commitment , but since the drought occurred last year they with—
drew the commitment. An alternate source was sought for water. A
commercial well permit was then issued to him by the state temporarily.
The County Planning Staff preferred to have a permanent well permit .
An augmentation plan was then filed with the State Court and received
final approval for the well and .the augmentation plan. A' problem has
now arisen with the Weld County Health Department regarding the water .
source and supply. The Health Department prefers to have the developer
provide the water treatment center rather than on an individual basis .
Mr. Bishop will have this hcanged on the plat . Water quality must be
approved by both the State and County Health Departments. There being
no questions at this time, Tom Honn read the staff' s recommendation for
continuing the hearing. Mr. Bishop then stated that the water testing
system for water quality is quite expensive, however they will proceed
with this if necessary. Mr. Bishop is quite anxious to get approval
as this final plat process has taken a year 's time. John Hall stated he
can do nothing until approval is received by the State Health Department.
Discussion followed.
MOTION: Be it therefore resolved to continue the hearing based on the
staff 's recommendation . Motion by Ben Nix, seconded by Jerry Kiefer.
A vote of "aye" was cast by Chuck Carlson , Ben Nix, Frank Suckla, Jerry
Kiefer, Percy Hiatt , and Bette Kountz. Motion carried.
APPLICANT: Lyle Picraux
CASE NUMBER: VI-72 : 77 :20
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Pt. SW4 , Section 32, T1N, R68W
LOCATION: . 3 miles west of I-25 on the north side of Colorado
State Highway 7
SUBUECT: Builder' s supply yard and office in the Agricultural Zone Distri
APPEARANCE : Lyle Picraux
DISCUSSION: Cathy Carter, Zoning Violation Inspector, read the report
on the property bringing the Planning Commission up-to-date regarding
what has occurred so far. Mr. Picraux stated that he has an application
for a change of zone and also has new drawings made for this property to
meet the requirements - for the original change of zone . request . This
application had been denied at a previous Planning Commission meeting.
Chuck Cunliffe stated he was not aware that Mr. Picraux was working
on a new application as neither he or Tom Honn had spoke with Mr. Picraux
Mr. Picraux then said that his office personnel had contacted the office
and requested that an application form besent .which was done. Mr.
Cunliffe also stated that he would suggest that Mr. Picraux be given 30
days to submit the change of zone application and if not received by
Planning Commissiollpi.nutes• i •
Page 6
August 1, 1978
September 1 , 1978, the matter would be taken to the County Commissioners
for legal action. Mr. Carlson said he felt this was reasonable.
MOTION : Be it therefore resolved to recommend that Mr. Picraux be
given 30 days to submit a change of zone application to the Planning
Office by September 1, 1978. If not received by that date the matter
will 'be taken to the Board of County Commissioners for legal action.
Motion by Jerry Kiefer, seconded by Bette Kountz. A vote of "aye"
was cast by Chuck Carlson, Ben Nix, Jerry Kiefer, Frank Suckla, Percy
Hiatt , Irma White , and Bette Kountz. . Motion carried_
APPLICANT: Larry and Carol Nelson
CASE NUMBER: VI-87 : 78 : 11
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Pt . NWq, Section 30, T3N, R68W
LOCATION: 2 miles south and 22 miles west of Mead
SUBJECT: Construction yard in the Estate Zone District
APPEARANCE: Charles Saxton
DISCUSSION: Cathy Carter, Zoning Violation Inspector , stated that
some very recent developments had occurred since her report was prepared
for the meeting. She did read the report into the record regarding the
violation to bring the Planning Commission up-to-date. Subsequent to
this report being prepared, Cathy Carter received a phone call from
Mr. Chuck Saxton , attorney representing Mr. and Mrs. Larry Nelson. Mr.
Nelson has this date hand delivered a copy of the October, 1972 letter
referred to in Cathy Carter 's Summary Report . Cathy Carter indicated
that Bob Adams , who wrote the October, 1972 , letter was present and
available for questions regarding his recollection of this matter
in the past. Copies of said letter were handed out to the Planning
Commission members. Cathy Carter further stated that several letters
have been received in the Planning Office by the residents of Seemore
Heights that are in favor of Mr. and Mrs. Nelson operation. A phone
call was received just prior to this hearing by Cathy Carter from a
complaining person in Seemore Heights who stressed their concern about
this excavating business continuing. Chuck Saxton at this time said
that witnesses am 'resent at this meeting who can testify to the fact
that Mrs . Nelson aa_c given assurance in 1972 that the present use of
the property was within the law and they could continue it . There were
also several persons in attendance who do not think the use of the
property is obnoxious to their use of the property. Negotiations have
been made at this time. Kay Norton then stated that in a meeting with
Mr. Bob Adams of the Planning Department Mr. Adams did in fact tell
the Nelson's in 1972 they could operate their business as a family
operated business under the home occupation section of the Zoning
Resolution . At this point Mrs . Norton suggested that the best settle-
ment would be to get precise information on the operation as it is now
and to agree that the operation will not be changed or expanded in any
quality or quantity from this day forward. Mr. Nelson stated that there
would probably not be any equipment there if it were not for vandalism
when the equipment is stored elsewhere. Cathy Carter suggested that
the documentation of equipment at present by the Nelson 's be very well
itemized and submitted to the Planning Office so that it does not
increase and they can keep track of it. Mr. Saxton stated that it would
be submitted within two weeks.
Planning Commissiorinutes •
Page 7
August 1,1978
MOTION: Be it therefore resolved that the use be allowed to continue
as it exists as of August 1 , 1978, and that Mr. Nelson will submit .
an agreement between Weld County and the Nelson ' s to include an
inventory and full description of the operation and will not be
allowed to expand or change it in any way . Motion by Ben Nix, seconded
by Bette Kountz. A vote of "aye" was cast by Chuck Carlson , Ben Nix,
Percy Hiatt , Jerry Kiefer, Frank Suckla, Irma White , and Bette Kountz.
Motion carried.
After some discussion among the Planning Commission members regarding
re-hearing the Lee Wieck change of zone application , it -was decided
they would again hear the change of zone application. Motion by
Frank Suckla, seconded by Ben Nix. A vote of "aye" was cast by Chuck
Carlson , Ben Nix, Jerry Kiefer, Percy Hiatt , Frank Suckla, Irma White
and Bette. Kountz. Motion carried. •
There being no further business , the meeting was adjourned.
•
Respectfully submitted,
Shirley A. Phillips
Planning Commission Secretary
/sap
Date : _1ugust 1 . 1978
CASE NUMBER: CUP-33:78: 2
NAME : Terry Bird/First Baptist Church of Windsor
REQUEST: Church
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Pt . SWI, Section 15, T6N, R67W
LOCATION: 2 mile east of Windsor, north side of Colo. Highway 392
THE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT THIS
REQUEST BE approved FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS :
1. The request is in conformance with the Weld County Comprehensive
Plan in that the new church is located within the Comprehensive
Plan area of the Town of Windsor and compatible with the future
land use of that municipality,
2. It is the opinion of the Department of Planning Services staff
that this request is in compliance with the provisions of
Section 3. 3.D.2. and 3. of the Weld County Zoning Resolution
which states :
"The Planning Commission and the Board of County
Commissioners shall consider the following in
making their determination in approving or denying
a conditional use permit : Compatibility with the
surrounding area, harmony with the character of the
neighborhood and existing agricultural uses in the
area, need for the proposed use , its effect upon
the immediate area, its effect on future development
of the area, and the health, safety and welfare of
the inhabitants of the area and the County. Before
a permit for a conditional use permit is issued, the
Planning Commission and the Board of County
Commissioners shall determine through hearings , that
the following plans, methods and studies, which shall
accompany the application for a conditional use
permit , provide adequate protection of the health,
safety and welfare of the inhabitants of the area
and the county. "
This determination is based upon the following:
A. The proposed Development Standards for the Conditional
Use Permit will provide for the adeauate protection of
Terry Bird/First Iltist Church of Windsor
CUP-33 : 78 :2
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
August 1, 1978
the health , safety and welfare of the inhabitants of
the area and the county.
B. The Windsor/Severance Fire Protection District has set
forth no objections to this request .
C. The Weld County Engineering Department has set forth
no objections to this request .
D. The Town of Windsor Planning Commission has recommended
approval of this request .
E. The applicant has submitted a petition with the
signatures of three surrounding property owners located
within 500' of the subject property who are in favor of
this request .
The Department of Planning Services staff recommendation for apporval
is conditional upon the following :
1. The Conditional Use Permit plan being amended to :
a. Indicate the reservation or dedication of an additional
12 feet of right-of-way along the north side of
State Highway 392 .
b. The existing access being relocated to the eastern
edge of the property. The access should be a
minimum distance of 10 feet from the eastern property
line.
These items were requested by the Colorado Division of
Highways in a letter dated March 31, 1978.
c. Delete the drainage area as shown on the plan .
Drainage of the property shall be in accordance with
the revised drainage materials submitted by the
applicant on June 29, 1978 .
2. The attached Development Standards being recommended and
adopted for the Conditional Use Permit area.
3. No building or electrical permits for the church building
shall be issued on the Conditional Use Permit area until
the Development Standards for the Conditional Use Permit
have been placed on the Conditional Use Permit plat and
said plat has been delivered to the Department of Planning
Services office.
First Baptist Church of Windsor
CUP
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
1. The permitted uses on the hereon described property shall be
the church and all other uses permitted by right in Section
3. 3B of the Weld County Zoning Resolution.
2. The single family residence may be used as a temporary sanctuary
for worship.
3. The Conditional Use Permit area shall be maintained in such a
manner so as to prevent soil erosion, fugitive dust , and the
growth of noxious weeds .
4. All parking shall be provided on-site . No parking shall be
allowed over any leach field area.
5. All accesses to the property shall have the approval of the
Colorado Division of Highways . All accesses shall be constructed
in accordance with recommendations and/or requirements of the
Colorado Division of Highways .
6. All sewage disposal facilities shall comply with County and State
Health Standards and Regulations .
7. Prior to construction of the church building, a soil engineering
test shall be conducted to determine proper footing design in
accordance with the Weld County Building Code .
8. A sign with dimensions as shown hereon may be erected on the
property.
9. No permanent structures , signs , or landscaping shrubbery shall
be permitted in the 12 foot right-of-way reservation or
dedication along the north side of State Highway 392.
10. The Conditional Use Permit shall be limited to the plans shown
hereon and governed by the Development Standards stated above
and all applicable Weld County Regulations . Any material
deviations from the plans and/or Development Standards as shown
or stated above shall require the approval of another Conditional
Use Permit before such changes shall be permitted. Any other
changes from the plans and/or Development Standards shall be
filed in the Office of the Department of Planning Services.
Date : ill 2, 1978
CASE: NUMBER : CUP-33 :78 :2
NAME: Terry Bird/ First Baptist Church of Windsor
REQUEST: Church
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Pt. SW* Section 15, T6N, R67W
LOCATION: 2 mile east of Windsor. north side of
Colorado Highway 392
THE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT THIS
REQUEST BE continued _ FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS :
1. It is the opinion of the Department of Planning Services Staff
that the applicant needs to resolve the concerns raised by the
Weld County Engineering Department in their memo dated May 1 .
1978 regarding drainage. The Engineering Department is requesting
a site development plan and the appropriate calculations on
drainage certified by an Engineer before a final recommendation
can be made by their department.
The Department of Planning Services Staff requests this applica-
tion be continued until the applicant has supplied the Weld
County Engineering Department with the requested information
needed in order for their Department to make a recommendation
on this application regarding the drainage issue. _
S
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVIC
.,r d WI I PHONE 13031 356-4000 EXT.
915 10TH STRE
® GREELEY, COLORADO 801
•
COLORADO
March 27, 1978
Mr. Terry Bird
P.O. Box 123
Windsor, CO 80550
RE : Request for a Conditional Use Permit for a church and
single family residence on a parcel of land described
as Pt . SW4 Section 15 , T6N, R67W of the 6th P.M. , Weld
County , Colorado
Dear Mr. Bird:
Your application and related materials for the above described
request are complete and in order. I have scheduled a meeting
with the Weld County Planning Commission for May 2 , 1978, at
1 : 30 p .m. This meeting will take place in the County Commis-
sioners ' Hearing Room, First Floor, Weld County Centennial Cen-
ter, 915 - 10th Street , Greeley , Colorado. It is recommended
that you and/or a representative be there to answer any ques-
tions the Planning Commission might have with respect to your
application .
It is the policy of Weld County to refer an application of this
nature to any town lying within 3 miles of the property in ques-
tion. Therefore , I have forwarded a copy of the materials sub-
mitted to the Town of Windsor for their review and comment .
According to our records , the Town of Windsor should review and
comment on your application on April 6 , 1978. Please contact
Kenneth Henschke with the Town of Windsor Planning Commission
at 686-7476 for further details on the Town of Windsor meeting.
If you have any questions with regards to this matter, please
do not hesitate to contact our office.
Respectfully ,
1 chit_
Chuck Cunliffe
Assistant Zoning Administrator
CC :kmh
No. c, 1 7 2 9 6 $ • SENDER: Complete items I.2.and i.
e Add your address in the 'RETURN TO space on
RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL 3 "YefJe'
SURAN `5 1. The following service is requested (check one). L
NOT FOR M
NO IN
INTERNATIONAL MAIL E COVERAGE PROVIDED— ❑ Show to whom and date delivered 250
z
(See Reverse) p O Show to whom,date,&address of delivery 450
SENT ro ❑ RESTRICTED DELIVERY.
��`�� ss Show to whom and date delivered 850
REST AND NO ❑ RESTRICTED DELIVERY.
S�@ , \T� _ Show to whom,date,and address of delivery ..51.05
PO SEAT AND ZIP COD P (Fees shown are in addition to postage charges and other
\ '‘i -v ATS& c\. .%(%\ fees).
coSTAGE _. _. 5 2. ARTICLE ADDR(yRScD���
CERTIFIED FEE 4 ua Y `y ��
LL SPECIAL DELIVERY C �C A\\ .; �. A'' ?J p
u. RESTRICTED DELIVERYu.
c z � 1
\J�'\A_V V. \�� �
W W Of PI
cr
uj
w U > SHOW ELWNRE AND G In 3. ARTICLE DESCRIPTION:
CC CC DATE DELIVERED REGISTERED NO. CERTIFIED NO. INSURED NO.
st I- CO N AND ADDRESS OF
DATE. \�.�
I—
ot d AND AUUHESS OF 6 m U
DELIVERY (Always obtain signature of addressee or agent)
6 O U SHOW TO WHOM AND DATE
,_j f n cc DELIVERED WITH RESTRICTED S Ig i1 I have received the article described above.
(0 0 z DELIVERY gel SIGNATURE .❑ Addr e ❑ thorized agent
z m SHOW ID WHOM,DATE AND C ,__-
O I. ADDRESS OF DELIVERY WITH C ---------
P i ^
• O R RESTRICTED DELIVERY 2
m f 'I� 7q/ 1
r to TOTAL POSTAGE AND FEES S IAn • DATE OF IJEjIVERY . POSe MARK
1
L--
7, POSTMARK OR DATE bi 3 /ryy' 4 it r
L.
G 5. ADDRESS (Complete only if requested)
so e --- N
w C S
6. UNABLE TO DELIVER BECAUSE: &AS
F
t}ace:n]8-O203-•3a
I
11
FIUI�G Nui in G_ - 3T_ 4/4J_ IM
NA MM E __lett1 eit\t 1(.5 Ar\
REQUEST C_6r {\a____qt_ 3 tY\4 __ReSI
• LEGAL DISCRIPTION ` Sv a 15 — Cs, -
LAND USE N -__--
E \
S 'I
ZONING n_c, .14iAtrixA
LOCATION L ''
a� WinASO' \ "-h S It
S r_ , 401.0. \ moral
C O M E r il S . `_
' iJ0 SWN_ V �VV%I. \\S \_ OCCAeeCL CAA G �
e x\S (Yl A; G CC-ess C2a,AT MS iAI a.,
NCoess
?a Yi - —
By
6\1\rja.-1 `
ICONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
FLOW SHEET S
APPLICANT: tcrr 1M►r& CCE \.c\-C.61 nCASE # ( Li_—' 5v C
REQUEST: ChU.rC�� (Lt . w\P. r W \1.1 KP
LEGAL: P 15 :1_1711t.±2
C T \I
`OCol�C -n : 'k w�0I2. P.AS� �/N/��YNclsor DATE BY
ti10 Yeti V;eve, e6 Ww.1 viz. 3f 2, 11a K vYI
Application Received /
Application Fee Receipt # -1 l 1L f2 1 / 115 . K1,y�
'
Recording Fee tkiZI111' 16
\YY\
Application Complete 24"i1a Cfre..--
P.C. Hearing Date: r(v y 2 ) \a1b 31 tp4- t otel/�e�ms''
Letter to Applicant Drafted / `-7''i- CJV�`--
Referrals Listed qv,- is v_ ,�`��
Field Check by D.P. S . Staff ' ( �pry
14 Nis " ' se
File Assembled 3\a_\\‘ % \-
Referrals Mailed Dr -.- \�k
Chaindexed .\- '- ‘, 't-
Notification of Applicant \\-�\�� \\-
Surrounding Property Owners Researched \\�\�% C
Airphoto/Vicinity Map Prepared V\- \wit V C-
Property Owners Notified by: 411.,1,8 y\ \A ,Y%.
Agendas Mailed by : 4(21 / 10 �\ay\Nt % s
1
Legal Approved by County Attorney /Z1 116 TO G0
O -
Referrals - Complete 4125 lb CAS
Preliminary D.P.S. Staff Comments 441V1 Ile
CAC.
Staff Conference L1 ( lb CAC. .
D.P.S . Comments 1 I lib C:Akc.
P.C. Hearing Action: P pptOV12sCio `J/ 0v 10..."
P.C. Resolution @A`-‘ -QCase Sent to Clerk to Board elsbilb C,
C.C. Hearing \--,,-5----\:\\ ActiorNr,Kv� ��� �`
C.C. Resolution Received
History Card Complete ��c'N % -g.-g.
C.C. Resolution Sent to Drafting \� ����
('_a
Drafted on Mylar WC(—"IS
Document Sent to Clerk and Recorder % -��IN �A
P.C. Minutes N '\N1/4 %. Q
. . . .
' lire $ 0
. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION
Weld County Planning Commission Services Building , Greeley , Colo .
FOR PLANNING DEPARTMENT USE ONLY : CASE NUMBER :
PC HEARING DATE : Inu Zi nlb
SEC : TWP : RANGE : CC HEARING DATE : Q
LAND CODE :
T : S : _ 1/4 : KEY :
SUB/DIV CODE :
SUB : BLK : LOT : KEY :
REFER TO : PERMIT FEE : 5,OD
1) DATE : APP . CHECKED B :
2 DATE : RECEIPT NO . silk i 'rt .4 W,,3
3 ) DATE : LEGAL DESC , APPRVL : (a
4 ) DATE :
TO BE CO1PLETED BY I1PPLICAN`f -TN ACCORDANCE WITH PROCEDURAL GUIDE RE-
QUIREMENTS : Print or type only , except for necessary signatures :
I , (we ) the undersigned hereby request a hearing before the Weld County
Planning Commission concerning a proposed Conditional Use Permit for
the following described unincorporated area of Weld County :
LEGAL DESCRIPTION of contiguous property owned upon which Conditional
Use Permit is proposed :
ue. al-Lae/66k,
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AREA :
�,1esrg-anl Rn•LL4�
OW Co/v, 5r trr' NyD 5c
STREET LOCATION : � F...fiSi F GR��-T ZONE �C��
PROPOSED USE : PA5TOL, . ,,SI,,a-�z-cIE _._ CNUh?Ci dSANGTduJ '
REASON : X;vinrcy al An-MEV. _d: 't?..-_ i/S lc��s�25.tip
-
FEE OWNERS OF AREA PROPOSED FOR CONDITIONAL USE :
NAME : il�JJ ____ _ADDRESS : ,,'�''g `7 Cc. k TEL : 4.4‘G- t ) 7
NAME : e ,...O .A....... _ADDRESS :gox /03 p-lc,v7`ii1 TEL :8S7 20
NAME : _ ADDRESS : TEL :
I hereby depose and state under the penalities of perjury that all state
ments , proposals and/or plans submitted with or contained within this
application are true and correct to the best of my knowledge .
COUNTY OF WELD )
STATE OF COLORADO ) _, ' 4.;teC
4")
Signat+ ner or ut or ze ger
Subscribed and sworn to before me this -Z)i,„,c ay of ,..,17;,;,,,,„ ,,y,-�, , 19_ 9" .
/i
NOTARY PUBLIC
•
SEAL
My Commission Expires : ? — / —1/
,
Larch 20, 1978
P.O. Lox 123
Windsor, Colorado 0C550
To whom it may concern:
We, the People of First iiaptist Church of Windsor, would like to
propose to the Weld County Plannin hoard and Commissioners the
Conditional Use Plan for property east of Windsor in the 3out1. West
Quarter or Section 15. We would like to purchase a 1 .617 acres
for the use of a pastor' s residence and a reli:-,ious sanctuary . We
have hereby desi__ned a plot plan de ctibln use of the property
desired for s'...cu purpose.
�e Lave discribed an access entrance wa off of Ii :hway 352 with
the driveway rnnnin1Forth East slon. property and adjacent to the
riJl.t-of-way of hreft Western Railroad.
The pastor's residence is to be built first in the Forth East an _le
of property a:fro-i.2J.tely 2u, feet ?role property line. We would
like to propose temporary use of pastor' s residence as a tel. porary
sanctuary for worship.
We Lope to build a 30' x 56' buildinf to be used as a sanctuary in
approximately a year's time. When ;rowth_ of the comae ation is
sufficient, we would like to make a 36' x 76' addition to the 36'
x 5( ' sanctuary.
We feel Llere is a need of raisin tle present level of 'ro'und
2 feet for proper drainage of surface water in irritation season
and extremely rainy conditions. We have also desifned ''.n _ 'rout':
'Jest annle a draina e area for evaporation purposes, it' so needed
in eat esely J(7,
fie are propos.inf- a septic systems- for the pastor's residenc and
septic s; steer_ for the church sanctuary.
We plan to use the l.orthern Weld County later District as a. w Cser
acility.
Any questions can to directed to the P,.stor Terry bird at P.O. Sox
123, Windsor, Colorado, 8050, or phone tt1.-7796.
Sincerely yours,
First Baptist Church of Windsor
,z t, /772
1t PLC. < ; �.
Larch 20, 1978
P.G. box 123
Windsor, Colorado 80550
To :r'nou:: it nay concern:
We, the con .regation of the First Baptist Church of Windsor,
have authorized the undersigned to propose to the county
of weld and to those who are concerned the described letter
and plot plan for a conditional use per__it and all said
descriptions of a 1 .C17 accr'_ge East of the torn of Windsor
in Section 15.
Any questions Lay be directed to the Pastor Terry Bird at
F.C. Box 123, Windsor, Colorado, C0;t,,0, or phone 86-7796.
Sincerely ours,
First baptist Church of Windsor
it/ w
S •
• PETITION SUPPORTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
Board of County Commissioners of Weld County , Colorado
Court House
Greeley , Colorado
Gentlemen :
We , the undersigned owners of property located within 500 feet
of the property described in the application submitted by few
j)Aloir5r CnoQcri of , hereby petition you to grant
this request for SiniarQ Q` infroPov.MENr use .
Signature Mailing Address Description of Property
) 4 . ) 36-yn b" 10, tea St•
i
! S
hay 1, 197C
First Baptist Church
F. C. Box 123
::indoor, Color:do CC55u
Dear i..a. Dean Pest:
It Le been called to our attention that the Color=ado Division
of Ei ;'hways would like to request some chan ,es to be rude on our
plot 21an that we submitted to "eld Count:.
;ne of ti:eso chan es is that the present access road be chan ed
iron,: its ;resent location on the west end of property along, I:i_°.kway
;92 to the east end of property :Alen: I?i:;hti:ay 392. :also, the request
of an additIonal 12 root setback of our shru. 'bery for the purpose
of further i:..: rrovellents for the hichway.
1 can sec no reason for any conflict in these clan -es you would
like us to LAZe on our plot plan. .e will do all necessary tinze
to cor:"1y.
Sinec rel, ;ours,
2irst baptist Church
Terry ;?ird, Nstor
db
��,��3031 �3Q
MAY 197$ co
c•Ceji/E,wet 5
O,1
N rha tl 1 v
t CI�R%ggJp� ti
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
ERNEST TI4GES �- ' rt." NORTH WELD COUNTY WATER DISTRICT
ALEX HEIOENREICH
ROBERT ALKIRE /(���M �' HIGHWAY 85 LUCERNE. COLORADO 80646
/GARY SIMPSON Ig��II it*
TOM REED li7 r LYLE NELSON. MGR.
P.O. BOX 56 - PHONE 356-3020
eorua:-y 27 , IC73
UP WIllYr S''Fv icr : 71-st 3aitist C__urch and -tarsonane
I?(wr 'entlemen :
'ItoH ( t ! or I :- ;I 1'• ",I Ii,IL' to A'"hr
. r' I ., ' n, . I ! I „vvI Ir .-.yr ; !v ,rl I, r•,12r•rl �. .
'mot . of 1/4 7,ec 15--6--67
tic,/
///1, !- x'r i-mr /X C1, 77i-i-9712/cr -,<1-7 . ^c ,5Ci, — — >96—
Si'] trr Is hrr•�en ( 1y hetwit; pruyI ,IU i r °. the
ch..-turilad property •
il,. I °•F :;°'I i (H' ' iu hr• Lad,' tIvUI I al) I (. tr, t he :ita
ihr•d i>ropE'l' tV prnvi (Ind al I requir(v:n•ntH oI
Ilia ' II7tit rir' ! ,Ir(' Hat. isficd .
If lontrU(' ] - runsuniatr'd with Nor! h Weld County
W.1 ; ( r I l 1 H t r i .' 1 » R h i n o n( year I ram date of this I a t t t,r ,
Ititt - I .HFIaI u1I arid void .
Acid] tiunit 1 ant .-.
Sin('eI''' Iy ,
NDR'fil %TI,D r'OUN'I'S WATER DISTRICT
,�j Lam' of 4zr/
D ID ,7 , NV( I H',II aner
I,DN/ I'F
S
For use in so!: of VACANT LAND ONLY
SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE CONTRACT
VACANT LAND)
Windsor,Colo. March 6 , 1978
RECEIVED FROMFirst Baptist Church, Windsor,Colo.
ParChaser OOf7Nft072HhufOct. tb, ..u: of s 100.00
in the form of Check to 11,,!(1 by - Fred Felte Realty
broker, in his escrow or trash, t ,uuct h ,.n. ;1 mime) and part payment for the following described real estate r '
situate in the _Ilk tSec.15xrtou,Rb7w county of - Weld olorado, to w)'
A tract of land located in the Southwest Quarter of Sectt,ion 15, Township (6) North
ange ?7 nest of Sixth Y.M. vleld Countyrcolorado,Approximate]y 1.617 acres.
th all utsau„nt aid ;-:_hi: • ., , , ,i.;-out which property purchaser agrees to buy upon the follow-
s
it e testes • nd condt .,.n- f, , • -r 8100.00 _ -, payable as follows: $ 100.00__—_
L, e.I y re tptie fo:' $ 60T0. - - certified funds at cloLing,
rhtE purchaseagr ,emer.t is subject to the purchaser to be approved for a
building permit. - _--
to delude just the land,
I , tboakirxxixpctr-: yxxxx rxxxlX't¢rLp(hscdsu xxxi current commitment for title insurance policy in
an amount e:pwl to the r irrhaHe rrii„, ,,t „'iP„t,.s option and expense, shall' be furnished the purchaser on or be-
fore 25th ;Iaroh _ 19 78 If seller elects to furnish said title insurance commitment, seller
will deli.o r the titl,- insurance ill,.,y it, ltcr,dhe=er alter closing and pay the premium thereon.
2 Title shall be nlerchanu,h,e in the st Ilor. Subject to payment or tender as above provided and compliance
with the other terms and tond•tio is hi-n'under buy purchaser, the seller shall execute and deliver a good angdsuf-
ficient - General__- u:rrauty deed to said purchaser on -_ March 31 , 191
or, by mutual agreement. at an earlier date. conveying said property free and clear of all taxes, except the general
taxes for 19. 78. , pavabi,• .launarc 1. 1979 _. and None. --._ _-- ---
_ IF, .n+J i I.:ti . f all Dens fur special improvements now installed, whether assessed
or not and free „nd ,.o:n f -l1 rrn- and ou- nmbranoo s except: None.
n,d ex, -pt easements i -r'. as of record. --
and subject ti. - ,r-i n-i t - i- . .1 I, ned the folowing restrictive covenants:_ & tncord.--- -..
•
3 C •neral ti,v< t„. I4 e- •.hit sed nu I.1 7'r - Icy and 1971.— assessment), prnanti B7ltantexerr®OCII-
3ha)l he apportion, d h. dory . 1 .PSI n,;, of dyed.
SC 27-7-71 eeru,r , .,o.,me,,,. ,iai rare re,nnt Ln„d;
The printed portion- of tti" fond apvro.en h. the 1 etorado aped Estate Compilation (SC 27.7-71)
Fred Felts =salty
4. 'The hoar and place of *losing shall be as designated by ._
6. Possession of premises d8 of clo Sill
shall he delivered b purchaser on �'-- Q
None.
subject to the following leases or tenancies,
6. In the event the premises are substantially damaged by fire, flood or other casualty between the date of
this agreement and the date of possession or the date of d elivei y of deed, whichever shall be earlier, this agreement
may, at the option of the purchaser herein, be declared null and void and any deposit herein made shall be hand-
lately returned to purchaser.
7. Time is of the essence hereof, and if any payment or any other condition hereof is not made, tendered, eg
performed by either the eerier or purchaser as herein provided, then this contract. at the option of the party who is
not in default, may be terminated by such party, in which case the non-defaulting party may recover such damages
as may be proper. In the event of such default by the seller, and the purchaser elects to treat the contract as ter-
minated. then all payments made hereon shall be returned to the purchaser. In the event of such default by the par-
chaser, and the seller elects to treat the contract as terminated, then all payments made hereunder shall be for-
feited and retained on behalf of the seller. In the event, box err r, the non-defaulting party elects to treat this con-
tract as being in full force and effect, t:.tn nottnng herein shaf be construed to prevent its specific performance.
1
In the event the seller falls to approve this Inter ument in writing within 0. ----- days from the data
hereon or if title is not merchantable and written iiruc- of defects is given to the seller or agent within the time
herein provided for delivery of deed and shall nor be ron dered merchantable within 60 days after such written no-
tice, then this contract, at purchasers option. shall be void end of no effect and each party hereto shall be released
from all obligations lot reunder and the payments made hereunder shall be returned forthwith to purchaser upon re-
turn of the abstract if any, to seller, provided, however, that in lieu of correcting such defects, seller may with-
in said 60 days, obtain a commitment for Owner's Title Insurance Policy in the *remount of the purchase price
showing the title to be free from such defects and seller shalt pay full premium for such Title Insurance Policy.
arne t Toney to be returned if purchaser is unable
9. Additional Provisions _ -_ - -- _--- - --- -- —
10. Upon approval hereof by the seller. this agreement shall become a contract between seller and purchaser
and shall inure to the benefit of the heirs. successors and assigns of said parties.
Agent Fred Felts 3ealty
— -
Purchaser _- _- - Date
-- -- —
--- — By —._ i l Felts
Pal-tamer Duty
Marh
Seller approves the abyve contract this -- day of 1, 19 78 and agrees to pay
a commission of __. 6 % of the gross sales price for services in this transaction, and agrees that, in the event
of forfeiture of payments made by purchaser, such payments shall be divided between the seller's broker tad the
•
seller, one half thereof to said broker, but not to exceed the commission, and the balance to the seller.
eke.._ Baler
Purchaser's Address
Seller's Address - -- ----
. SC n-7-71
REFERRAL LISP
APPLICANT Terry Bird
CASE # CUP- 33 : 78 : 2
REFERRALS SENT OUT ON : March 27 , 1978
REFERRALS RECEIVED
County Attorney
County Health
County Engineer
Soil Conservation Service
4302 West 9th Street Road
Greeley , Colorado 80631
APR State Highway Department
1402 2nd Street
Greeley , Colorado 80631
Town of Windsor 0- 686 - 7476
APR 1�7� Windsor Planning Commission P . C . 4 / 6 / 78
�- �. c / o Ken Kenschke T . B . 4 / 10 / 78
Box 627
Windsor , Colorado 80550
Windsor- Severance Fire District
APR 2 c / o Wayne Lutz
Box 308
Windsor , Colorado 80550
Harry Ashley
Windsor 1st National Bank
Windsor , Colorado 80550
I.
0 I I 111I ?,Il wII din ANNING srilvICI
v.I 16) CUUN7Y CI:rJ I CNNIAL CEN I
915 1011 510E
GHEE LEY,COLORADO EO(
( ' ' r;- l \\ GARY Z. FORTNI
11 n ` t I i i J1.1 DIRECT OH or PLANNI
L;14-
r' 11( 'r. PHONE (203) 360 4000, EXT.
COLORADO
March 27, 1978
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: •
Enclosed is an application from Terry Bird
for a Conditional Use Permit for a Church and Single •
Family Residence (Parsonage )
This item will be heard before the Weld County Planning Commission on
May 2 , 1978 If you have any comments or suggestions,
may we please hear from you before April 18978 . The loca-
tion of the parcel of land for which this application has been submit-
ted is Pt . SW* , Section 15 , TON, R67W •
Thank you.
nC1 f (� 1
L.:. l —"N'1/4-4/ I_LI. ..
Assistant Zoning Administrator
Enclosures
•
,. ;1 I ) I 1 1I 1ii 1 Y f.) ), !1,11`,'.'( if-.1I I
(.1 I in I 111 I Hp
1,I1,IIIIi IA' Igl111_
1111 r 1.11'',1
' II'.1AN I AM SI
mORAf1DU(
, . ,, „,
Chuck Cunliffe Date July 10 , 1978
Wilk To
COLORADO From Drew Scheltinga , Engineering Department
subject: First Baptist Church C . U . P .
Mr . Bird has supplied the drainage information I requested
in my May 1 , 1978 memorandum. As we discussed , a formal
report certified by an engineer will not be required for
this site . Mr . Bird has indicated the site will be filled
and graded to drain to an existing 24" pipe under State
Highway 392 .
The only entrance to the site is from the State Highway .
Therefore , the State will be permitting and reviewing that
aspect . n\
Drew L . Scheltinga
Engineering Department
DLS : sar
AicoN
JUL1978 '�
ro RECEIVED aS
ql
.— Weld Cennry `Q ti
ecin Planing Cemeisslee i�
c8c) er96116b
rrftmoRAnDurlt
To Chuck Cunliffe pate May 1, 1978
COLORADO From Drew Scheltinga
Subject First Baptist Church C.U.P.
There has been no information regarding drainage supplied to this
office. Considering the poor soil conditions on this site it is
very important that proper drainage be considered.
The site plan indicates a drainage area. The plan should indicate
how the runoff is to be directed to the pond and how the water is
to be released and where it will go. Because of the soil conditions
the perculation or evaporation will not be an acceptable manor to
dispose of storm water. Runoff detention should also be included
in the design.
A site developement plan and the appropriate calculations certified
by an Engineer should be supplied.
If there are any questions regarding these requirements , please
contact me.
Drew L. Scheltinga 1O303 2�c\
DLS : sar
C fit. 1978
m CEP,
iv
New e FQ co
tzt O�eeje C'remitiot
ti
dmoRnnDurf
WIDCTo Planning Commission Data April 14 , 1978
COLORADO From Gilman E. Olson
Subject: Terry Bird C.U.P.
There are no County Road problems anticipated by this request as
all ingress and egress will be from State Highway #392.
Gilman E. Olson
GEO: sar
11 la 1374`�� J ,.
4 APR 1970 n-\
RECEiv
Nefd ED
`,7artring muitugg "�
0
•
Department
OF HEALTH
Weld
eld County hrealtf Department DAVID WERKING, DDS, Greeley
FRANKLIN D. YODER, MD, MPH RALPH AAB, Greeley
Director 1516 HOSPITAL ROAD WILLIAM BLICK, Roggen
GREELEY, COLORADO 80631 DORIS DEFFKE. Greeley
DONALD HERGERT, Windsor
(303)353-0540 ANNETTE M. LOPEZ. Greeley
HERSCHEL PHELPS, JR.. M.D..
Greeley
KATHLEEN SHAUGHNESSV, Ault
April 6, 1978 JOE STOCKTON. Gucrest
Mr. Gary Fortner, Director
Planning Services
915-10th Street
Greeley, CO 80631
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
The request for a Conditional Use Permit by the First Baptist Church of
Windsor for a church and single family residence (Pt. SW' , Section 15,
Township 6 North, Range 67 West) has been evaluated by our staff and the
following recommendations submitted for your review:
1. We are concerned primarily with sewage disposal at the
1.617 acre site. Mr. Terry Bird, Pastor, has applied
for a sewage disposal permit (#99, 4-5-78) . However,
the church proposal states that the home will be used
as a "temporary sanctuary for worship" for at least
one year, as plans are not definite for building the
actual church structure.
2. Also, we are concerned wit the high water table at the
site. Land in the northwest section of the site exhibits
salt accretion and the evidence presented by the soil
conservation staff state that, "Most of the soils (Aquolls
and Aquepts, flooded) are subject to excessive runoff.
A water table is at or near the surface in the Spring,
and during the peak irrigation season. " The request states
that a drainage area will be made in this area. Kim loan
type soils are found in the rest of the area and could
support a sewage system. The system must be engineer
designed per the Weld County Health Department's Individual
Sewage Disposal System Regulations requirement 3.5.c. This
design must then be approved by the Weld County Board of
Health.
3. Because of lot size limitations, and high ground water
potential, we would recommend that both the single family
residence and the church building be tied into the same
sewage disposal system, which would be sized accordingly
for both structures. The high water table may preclude
conventional septic systems; however, this is an engineering
consideration. Proposed plans call for parking all around
the church building which could pose a hazard to a sewage
system located next to that building. No parking would be
allowed over any leachfield area. Lines connecting building
sewers to the septic tanks and running under parking areas
would be required to be cast iron. In no case would a septic
system be allowed in the proposed drainage area.
Page 2 S f
Gary Fortner
April 6, 1978
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please feel free to
call this office.
Sincerely,444141Ronald K. tS ow, Supervisor
Environmental Health Services
RKS:dr
It'
c RECEIVED r
weld Cooety ,
`/c Amin teals" ,1,71
April 25 , 1978
CUP-33 : 78 : 2
Mr. Ernest Tigges with the Windsor/Severance Fire Protection
District indicated that the district had reviewed the request
and had no objections to it .
,,, est Gree ey o onserva on .0 s rrc
IOM •
e DISTRICTS
•r P. 0. Box 86 • Greeley, Colorado 80631
ANEMIC'
Cava• April 17, 1978
Gary Z. Fortner, Director
Weld County Planning Commission
Weld County Centennial Center
915 10th Street
Greeley, Colorado 80631
The following comments are in answer to a requested review of a Conditional Use
Permit for a church and single family residence for the First Baptist Church of
Windsor. It is to be located in the SEySE4SW4 of Sec. 15, Twp. 6N, Range 67W.
The planned development is confined to a 1.6 acre area, which is made up of two
soil types as indicated by our soil survey. They are Aquolls and Aquepts, flooded
(85%) , and Kim loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes, (15%). The Aquolls and Aquepts soil
type, which is deep and a poorly drained soil, is subject to excessive runoff and
usually has a water table at or near the surface in the spring and during the peak
irrigation season. The planned church building seems to be located on the Aquolls
and Aquepts soil. There is no soil engineering data with the request to indicate
water table depths or engineering data to indicate the necessary foundation design
for water table construction. It is our feelings that some soil engineering test-
ing be performed to evaluate the feasibility of constructing a building on this
site. The residence building does seem to be located on the Kim loam soil which
has few limitations for the construction of a septic tank filter field, but does
exhibit a low strength condition for construction of dwellings with or without
basements and may require soil engineering tests to determine proper footing design.
The drainage area as shown on the map of the area has adequate capacity to hold
surface drainage of a 10 year, 24 hour frequency storm. However, the planned capa-
city may be lessened if there is sub-surface water present. The drainage basin is
shown to be constructed in the Aquolls and Aquents soil type. The retention pond
should also have a conduit of 2 CFS capacity to discharge additional surface runoff
should the pond be full at time of another storm.
The development area defined in the request is not considered prime farmland.
We can see no reason, other than those sited above, why this plan should not be
accepted as long as it meets the present county development plan.
Sincerely, .y
Milton Baumgartner, President t9?0Jj �
West Greeley Soil Conservation District ^c-N/Or a, ��,
APR 1978
MB/jb N RecOVE'D
r Ne1d tanal
CeRRieeloT
tc p�znnleE p
ns crAT4A of WViiidesof
yV
1'� re" P.O. BOX 621 WINDSOR, COLORADO 80550
April 10, 1978
Department of Planning Services
Attention : Mr. Chuck Cunliffe
Weld County Centennial Building
915 Tenth Street
Greeley, Colorado 80631
Dear Chuck:
The Windsor Planning Commission recommends approval of
the conditional use permit for a church and a parsonage
which has been requested by Terry Bird.
Thank you for bringing this matter to our attention .
Sincerely,
TOWN OF WINDSOR
pa j h c C. t xi.,
Ruth Fidino
Town Planner
RF/jc
O\12 1374r
co
pPR 1g18 8 ,,,
woo `,5
aGE
CO coR viii g°C° N
N :ti\i
s P1nit. <3,
STATE IEPARTMENT OF HGHWAYSwe1d County
JACK KINSTLINGER >' EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR SH 392
T. Bird Cond. I
Permit
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS DISTRICT 4
E. N. HAASE ! • DWIGHT M. BOWER
CHIEF ENGINEER N4,NER. DISTRICT ENGINEER
STATE OF COLORADO SW 4, Sec. 15,
P.O. BOX 850-1420 - 2ND ST. • GREELEY. COLORADO 80631 • (303) 353-1232 T. 6, R. 67
March 31 , 1978 DOH FILE 45100
Mr. Chuck Cunliffe
Department of Planning Services
Weld County
Centennial Center
915 Tenth Street
Greeley, Colorado 80631
Dear Mr. Cunliffe:
The Colorado Division of Highways has reviewed the Terry Bird application
for a Conditional Use Permit for a church and single family residence (parsonage).
The following comments concern our right-of-way needs, placement of shrubbery,
and access location.
1 . Our existing right of way on State Highway 392 is 138 feet: 60 feet north
of centerline and 78 feet to the south of centerline. In order to meet our
projected needs based on anticipated traffic increases, we require a total
of 150 feet of right of way. We request that an additional 12 feet be pro-
tected on the north side of the existing right of way. This can be accom-
plished by reservation, setback, or dedication (preferably the latter) , as
local zoning laws and regulations permit.
2. We note that some shrubbery is to be provided along the highway. We ask
that this shrubbery be located outside of the 12-foot setback so that it
will not conflict with potential highway improvements.
3. The existing access point is of concern to us, and we feel that it should
be relocated for several reasons. Its proximity to the railroad tracks
could create safety problems for vehicles slowing to enter the church
property from the west. There could also be sight problems for vehicles
exiting the property and proceeding west. It would also be difficult for
a driver exiting the property to see a train by looking back over his right
shoulder.
We suggest that the access point be moved to the eastern edge of the property
adjacent to the SW 4 corner line of Section 15. This would provide a good
separation from the railroad tracks, and it could also serve as a means
of joint access to the property to the east should it develop in the future.
•
• Weld County
SH 392
T. Bird Cond. I
Permit
DOH FILE 45100
MR. CHUCK CUNLIFFE
March 31 , 1978
Page Two
Thank you for the opportunity to review this application.
Very truly yours,
DWIGHT M. BOWER
DISTRICT ENGINEER
( (t C _
Albert Chotvacs7-----
Assistant District Engineer
AC: da
cc: D. M. Bower
D. N. Fraser
File: Crier-Jacobson via Finch-Graham
w/encl .
, APR 1978 0
RECEIVE p
e Mania
Couatr
c,� l Coarelasioe ..p`
0
Terry Bird
CUP-33 :78: 2
SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS
April 5, 1978
Ruth Winder and Erna W. Butler
Windsor, Colorado 80550
Jacob H. and Betty J. Stromberger
Route 1, Box 66
Windsor, Colorado 80550
Minco Associates
c/o Dan Erhart
11659 Eldorado Street N.W.
Anoka, Minnesota 55303
Helen Miller
Box 944
Windsor, Colorado 80550
R. C. Staheen
c/o Paint Company, Inc.
1400 St . Paul Street
Rochester, New York 14621
Henry and Frieda Katherine Haas
Route 1
Windsor, Colorado 80550
Ronald G. and Barbara H. Alder
Route 1 , Box 5
Windsor, Colorado 80550
s •
DL RAH 1MLNi ul PLANNING SERVic
`` Nr PHONE (3031 35G-4000 EXT.
✓q '- 11- 015 I0TH ST H
1f GULL LEY, COLORADO 8C
• 3,t
COLORADO
April 5 , 1978
To Whom It May Concern :
You are receiving a copy of this notification because your name
appears as a surrounding property owner owning property within 500
feet of the proposed use.
The Weld County Planning Commission will review a request from
Terry Bird
for Church and Single Family Residence (Parsonage )
on property described as follows : Pt . SW} , Section 15, TOM, R67W
location : n mile east of Windsor on the north side of Highway 392
If you have any suggestions or objections , will you kindly notify us
in writing before April 18 , 1978 . The meeting by the
Weld County Planning Commission is scheduled for May 2, 1978 •
This meeting will take place in the County Commissioners Hearing Room,
first floor , Weld County Centennial Center, 915 10th Street , Greeley,
Colorado , at 1 : 30 p.m. If you have any questions concerning this
matter or if you would like additional information , please contact
the Department of Planning Service,; office at 35G-1000 , P.et: . 'IO-1 .
I "
aLA. . Qiu,SIL
AssistunI, Zoning Administrator
•
y _ /a - 7e
•
n
F
G ig CU41 ,&-,,--
qA_.04 fr-4.,
,.\\12�14,64,5
", APR 1978 9
c° REiCEIVE.D o m z-
cs tea teedi ti
c° ?Junin6 teeeissli ti ✓/ J�—,�i-0
`.£0£6182 LZ°O'd
jo.rs-6
0
QU4h V M n c:6',:v < Fyncit \AL: 1
Lti k'1anScv Cam: , Gncob kcx j, C-Fronnh Pricy
+� l 'Bak G ' t nascr r cs>
A-c%,c( c),-k);
Iclbvvccc1O C.+, Nt J
-A no 'C-CA Ititinn 3C
dk �1 111; ((ix Ism x 3 44 U-v.i nC4 v Co, 0.c.(
C Stoh.2v\ % I t Cp, I4 , � •
I4Cv SfU Acoti S'ro _ vLh St �� �Y� i4C21
tai ,-fotSw
1�1C iC� qt, e:( C%, Vjrivo he AldEr-
`4
_ 1 lb
027
44�y # Frird* tcr.k
A
HAM )-
ic771'r'7
RC' f1 Lot 11 (4 .,..>•,, `. `':
w: .., s✓
Lc-t- A Adair 7
oki A Roth 4 Boffir &vim• W
LotAs,
t46.04104- G. Sale
,,
it. *Li 1491”t ,t 0 f
—, triox
rGx1ifl ? '
1,...._____", CP (7:
0\k
01 oP
3AOb N. & QtH'
041 0V% Rt ! As t6 ArA Ruff ,ati*ftac✓ 1 W.4.rtor Co .
Qgnat w. R tot Icy
$os-s'n
i1.n.tif iggt In 42
7 2I
s
S4,ct. ( T6'i f 41
4 nc v- ftociafa `20,x+- Erhart_
11653 Sadorodo .11. AniacA M h., 55 707
94 947 lCzla►9 -w2
at9 F c��_ iafc og 2cccv_vcer Oka
7.t•1? 11frni %Is
fcc4- 22 it 14 ge7 _
014 - Nclsn Kau, Rox 944 '4tidior co,$o z 0
tr47(o? .
030 . R . C . Sl& cj __ % PaAt 4. Inc.
14°o rt. Pain. Ct. exhtritv N.Y. l 6ZF
-s s 'Ct3 -3• "L% �t
I_!wo �'1CiX _� � ��yroh �� i, .I Ain 4)� 17397t.>> II 27 77
/ 7 2:;-C") 2-41 .)-?-
Li - - -0 2-7 k3ft. A
ALDeZ tic, ( tt
'llate_ 1fF
aIll
R���r / .
,3 j
�t`rP . zio 1
'y M
e
r• (?�" >k.:.
���• 543 h
+D h°J , 53 2 C
v
/6/7 Acres
b
N
S ^/)° , i " " /, _ -/,
to%ratio S/ale Nwy. 392 ^,m
60' ROw' 1- ;e'
L- 6is Cot: Sec. /5,
76 N, R6 7W
I
• /ndica/es /17//75 Sc -
■ /, Ica/es Pins Fou,'�d
•
y
•
J' 4P "
Sca/e / r./00 t d`
Pte',-'.
i -4
is
- I I ,,,
/
! I
LEGAL DESCRIPTION ".
ri
A tract of land located in the Southwest Quarter (SW1/4) of Section 15, .
Township 6 north, Range u7 West of the Sixth Principal Meridian, Weld
County, Colorado and being more particularly described as follows: 0,
Commencing at the South Quarter Corner (Sl/4Cor) of said Section 15, and P,
considering the East Line of the Southwest Quarter (SWl/4) of said Section 15 'i 9 :7.
to bear North 00° 36' 23" East with all bearings contained herein being
relative thereto:
Thence North 00° 36' 23 East, along the East Line of the Southwest Quarter
(SW1/4) of said Section 15, 93. 34 feet to the True Point of Beginning ;
Thence South F5° 33' 00 ' West, along the North Right-of-Way Line of
Colorado State Highway 4o. 392 , 424.17 feet;
Thence North 51° 53' 25 East , along the South Right-of-Way Line of the
Great Western Rci 'road , 543.53 feet;
Thence South 00° 36' 2, West, along the East Line of the Southwest Quarter
(SW1/4) of said Section 15, 332. 14 feet to the True Point of Beginning.
Said tract of land contains 1 .61 ' acres.
SURVEYOR' S CERTIFICATE
I do hereby certify that , under my personal supervision, this plat and
legal description were prepared and that the corner monuments indicated
hereon were properly placed during an actual and accurate survey of the
land completed on January 14, 1972.
This survey does not constitute a report or opinion upon the existence
of Easements or Rights-of-Way, whether recorded or unrecorded, and it is
not a report or opinion upon any matters of title.
Paul E. Radasch, Registered Land Surveyor and
Professional Engineer, Colorado Reg. No. 5080
•
NELSON, HALEY, PATTERSON and QUIRK, INC.
it Engineering Consultants
1
Gree'ey, Colorado
A .
PROJECT NO. 72-1-SUR-MOOS !(<'
(i I
��23 4 5 6,8
9
0
�
-O• J L x A N
`mss, ¢ yV' t
cF2�C1lOC b`��
t
Cie
2
z
tra
Ll-
cd Uce
le
4 •y mil 4 s i i S 'i + 1 i 3 } 2 1-';
.. 5
`�! ?`r i� .. -
•
,> 1 IBS ) ? :nI -i -1-cv �d4
1+r
[C 'vHU IL VI
�J?" _ _ rn Cie of -4q .,
Cc: k L
. e^c 'E oaN
re
'2 V ��
a T
h
)i� Q I-
It-
rn
�. \ r6 V0
�y
O a
v
do --Nsf, M U
F
00
in
,17
/ J
y'� V. S
U J
d. JJ
1 N
p / col rtoDAK
2 LI
U
O
J
0
i C
N
f-
Z
s
* i
x.-23 4 5.--.N.,\
,'\" ,9-\\
O� 4 rQ. 2 1 itt
It
u.)
sr
il z
a ?
a.
2ro
Id
c
O U-
U
---- -
_.ht_WIEAL r fir-1r .(r) ^ r
—i_ A. v v I' f' yy
. . N4-\,...,...--- — —Pr ; a n
-k , ,
ii
- , 2 \ 'i J
\ �
�`
ry'
L v\
2
,\,, • 3
a
` itt
-1/4 c
I-
61.
t.
\IL i �% 2 2
a 2 ill
�`n -�- t `nit r0
Crj, C . ice 459
2 �1' �,vt't O O
0
cr
'V y u
fin
do O
p
p- P rn
a .. Nr rr
p..... ?a. - yA
•
% -e a
u7
a
>\^ o
,n c _3
LTD
\A 1S s
a
o s
1 N
J
w
I
o
c 1
Q
1:1
7
J 1
J
d.
• S
I J
1)
n- d
-ID ci
c: c, H G J
f, c fTTC,1 f 0! rI ,_, 7 c 'd o
V. J5 Q.
F_ 1 a, rl � _ d 0
0
ill c J, e +
CC 4-3
f � IlT3 � '"1 1
"�1 � c‘ u q s, v a .t•
,
r-
I 01 V NJ.
.-- _ . - - is + '
i 1 '�, -- - - --� , - - - -� 5..
i1, C) 0 N C1
1l 1�'L(17 c.1-. !i Fr P fJ
I: V • II O L) -Y a3
'�.� fl,. f Iii .t- : (- ; 1 0 0 O 0
i e C, J, UI •'I 1 0 -4-)
_.PL. 1 � I :C, I T- . I rI - I c - N -P
� . Ll. C I p 0 7.1
w
i, v a,
—I---- c1 ., d rI •rr
U. - -- ], CT c-,
1 ,1 .-. , iv M N 4
i s 69 1 - , , L , dot t. I n V 1-,
3
11G1 }1 too„a !' c. •1i L1
d { �. N CI. rl -a ( i C O 4 1
'� T:`J c .J•}LT.j Pun r; i „ I Ci I0 d c: O
Dv 1.±11'3,2r1(' '034.10 ' , w 'C1 O e1 01 'O
L . 1 LDc ll ' 1 4, C) 0 C 4-'
-
C 1 e,-. _ :.i V •d cJ ,v o
1' i .7 L L 'c� '.C I ,-1 ti ;
I
• � kV _ T C4 2i -) C f,
p 1 it c c rI14 Ci �',1 �. '� C) c r,
-Evi LIi J. IIOL Ll3 ry I •0 X C 0 C
0 O X a •.1 O
—Zct., llTc,u�:t>,d t3t;:7 I J> O t: TI u
r I..r1.:r ,, r1 .(,1 :x,L_t[un, l t .:1 0 +> s n,
Ci - __.__ ... - � f--"- -_�- ci 0 CI -P F,
111 •,'3 I CI Ir.-G C) O la It 1 C I. C r1 c: II C a
- - ) F, 1'17 \0 H.H CV r1 .I r ,v r CI UV 'Cl ID
CO C)
C) _. —a---. r-1 01_.--C _ 11.0.. i� . -[t Ct D.'_� 1 I r p o H 0 4H i•
(l U IC _ i If H H O <l (IAI •r}
11 p)n� I JO L I _ .u . iI0- 1 r CJ -I ,-1rI .0 t� C) 1
d O 0 , i C)
l -t�1 .t'� G' I1lr T i - _ __._� — �. U ^-f G µ
ri
iC11 , Il -1 C?�, � 1. I I C1 i 1 u •_� c: 0 0 C1,
I I 1. . Ill -,I1 D. ,1 CI a CO
i -
r
--'\� .10 Sa.I1C'C3 rUJL1 '.f\ r I N 1 �J _I r • n h ft 'CI
' I --- 1 Ci I'd c1
!.' ^Ci G.) CT :11^T f is CI -ID 0 1> >
! 1 a I . I .- I -I C E C • 1
f '. .3� .I oy, Cam '-• t1 .OJ , 1 t1 !. ,,
. { L y , 1 N , C) -, .9 O H {� c'
VJ 1 L- �.. <' ,`, Fr -i • C1 F
I,, —_.__- —_._—_.__.___.___...�„ ,� _ _ _._r.. _ —_._ C w d c1 ❑ C Pt
II
,R c; rJ S: •ri I)
, .1 � 4, •- J - .t: CI C9 � H tC
CI
i ! .� b? [1 C) C1 C •r1 ,.1 CI
C) N •i U C) •� .C O N F,
, 1 J CI i-1 C) 1 1 O 1 •:7 Fi .i :c -,--) 0 F1,
•{ jJ i (-Si " -P •1 U -I C ;4
Cc.)
-ICI I I .-I I., s. CI Cl 1 C.
.`:I I •) .. I 6 � A ;, 1 11 r1 w
C1 ,) a4 l• f t cl G O
3 C - H , C1 O T
-! I i.-I n I : k c7 O ; --I }, lr -i
r .. _ r 1 r I - .1 I ° H ID C c..) .O n P. C1 4-,
cj � l
o n I , I
F_1 1
(1 o I t •
•
P H" I . I I t
i Lr i ,HI R. C)I:_l L:,'.IUJ L.�1 ' .c1 :.-II-
Ili"
Ni
"?17 d tdeet
Greeley, f' ratio
RE: Soil Survey and Interpretation Date /— /c — 7/
• TO: �[ ":„C'-4
Soil Conservation Distr Att. :
Gentlemen:
I wish to request your ' 'el.nic.al assistance to snpoly r.. • and the ':',Id f:ount', Parr
nine Commission with site and land inventor , interpretation on land which
I own located as folio : (Please. he specific - show legal description - attach
sketch map, if necessniy) .
My intended use of this land for which I require soil infor❑ation is:
Check as applicable.
1. Mohile hen^ siler
2. Septic tank f i 1ter field
X 3. Ilomesi te::
4. Animal waste r.et .icie disposal syston
5. Other U#c2 u ,E�•,<ciili
I understand 1h-it this coil survey and interhretaiien is intended to assist rye in
gaining knowledge of ten physical features of my sail .amt does net necessaril' re-
place one-site inves! ', tien er tests for cpeciii physical hazards and/or dosianor
constitute any type of official approval or disapproval for a proposed land use.
Sincerel'',
. i CO3 .- .
r
v' /
Name
Approved for Technical Assistance / 1 LVfy�[NU.�' P.a%e «3
( if applicable) Address
•
6 AI - 7 7 7
Supervisor Phenc
r n
� � cclu t •
ue-�
C4'rc-'.( 0
a ,•
t • ..rte
aar t 1 •
r1 'Y w4r t a
dp o-rn
1 • 'T .� ', r
r� � J( r f�rrr I yf� y +tii ti
�� ��
,y aA G7 .f sr �''.,� 1
a a
t �- y ��y9
a
au G! �� I �� 1
aft A
Cal v.'s' c-ry.: •' I.- 4P r
r.of •• \\ �*taY4y0� a "r
2� @S`. ` !� an a •
,,y
3 • Nt r r r
t- a cl l
,h i ��Y
i.„. cps: ... f� 5 1,. mil. ,a. •, 7
nnc ....
•
R "'M lkf''T of 6 , • , .N .roller i'
K ,J. i aeP , 9.fsf b-.- w •
•
L.
) , ,
.r\r�
6 A, :I,
,.T .
*NO: r>rJ';k1
', r
r ' tilitil I f :, ) .
,..) ,,,,,L) tf{t" , f
fr .
II
1 }c:n. lt�� .A. y9• � . l , `' A , �•• jr
Lit; .e aft, " it i .*i` " �"i s'•flH, i A. � �,
dye. W4 £; `.:_ • M * _,, / - ...
•
/1 - Aquolls and Ague ts , flooded
These nearly level soils are on smooth plains in depressions and along
the bottoms of natural drainageways throughout the survey area. The
Aquolls , which have dark colored surface layers , make up about 55 '
percent of the mapping unit . The Aquepts , which have lighter colored
surface layers , make up about 25 percent . About 20 percent is made
up of soils which are well drained and soils which have sandstone or
shale within 48 inches of the surface .
These are deep , poorly drained soils . They formed in recent alluvium.
Typically they have mottled , mildly to moderately alkaline , loamy or
clayey surface layers and underlying materials which extend to a depth
of 60 inches or more . They may or may not have a gleyed layer in the
underlying material.
Most of these soils are subject to excessive runoff. A watertable is
at or near the surface in the spring and during the peak of the irri-
gation season.
These soils are used for rangeland and wildlife habitat . Some small
areas are used for irrigated pasture.
The potential native vegetation on these soils is dominated by switch
grass , prairie cordgrass , saltgrass , alkali sacaton , big bluestem,
Indiangrass , western wheatgrass , slender wheatgrass , sedge and rush.
Cattails and bullrush occur on swampy spots associated with this site.
Much of this site has an increased amount of salts due to farming and
irrigation of adjacent areas . Potential production ranges from 4000
• •
pounds per acre in favorable years to 3000 pounds per acre in unfavorable
years. When range condition deteriorates the tall and midgrasses
decrease , production drops and saltgrass sedge and rush increase.
Management of vegetation on this soil should he based on taking half and
leaving half of the total annual production. Switchgrass , big bluestem
Tndiangrass , western wheatgrass , pubescent wheatgrass , intermediate
wheatgrass , tall wheatgrass and tall fescue are suitable for seeding.
The plants selected should meet the seasonal requirements of livestock .
For successful seeding, a firm, prepared seedbed -- several tillage
operations will normally be needed to eliminate the undesirable
vegetation-- and a grass drill should be used . Early spring seeding has
proven most successful.
Wetland wildlife , especially waterfowl , utilize these areas . The
availability of moisture due to the wetness of this soil allows pro-
duction of wetland plants that provide nesting and protective cover .
as well as some food for waterfowl. The juxtaposition of this soil
to irrigated cropland areas where wildlife obtain much of their food . •
along with the cover provided , make this soil valuable to both wetland
and openland wildlife.
Openland wildlife , especially pheasants , use these areas for cover
and nesting , while they also provide excellent cover for deer when
found in areas inhabited by deer.
Management for wildlife would include prevention of overgrazing by
livestock , protection from unplanned fire , and prevention of drainage .
Where livestock are present , these valuable wildlife nreas should be
fenced to prevent encroachment and overuse by livestock.
Capability subclass VIw
Aquolls - Salt meadow range site
Agnepts - Wet mcaduw rail e : ite
►ei
som
it
Low/
53,, X H • •
32 - Kim loam, 1 to 3 percent slope
This is a deep, well drained soil on smooth plains and alluvial fans
at elevations of 4900 to 5250 feet. It formed in mixed eolian deposits
and parent sediments from a wide variety of bedrock.
Included in this unit are some soils that have sandy loam or loamy
sand underlying material.
Typically the surface layer is a brown to pale brown loam about 12 inches
thick. The underlying material is a light clay loam or loam about 28
inches thick. The substratum, to a depth of 60 inches is a loam or
fine sandy loam.
?rmeability is moderate. Available water capacity is high. Effective
rooting depth is 60 inches or more. Surface runoff is medium and erosion
hazard is low.
Where irrigated this soil is suited to all crops adapted to this area,
including corn, sugar beets, beans, alfalfa, small grains, potatoes
and onions. An example of a suitable cropping system is alfalfa 3 to
4 years followed by corn, corn for silage, sugar beets, small grain,
beans and back to alfalfa. Some conservation practices such as land
leveling, ditch lining and pipelines may be needed for proper water
applications.
All methods of irrigation are suitable with furrow irrigation the most
common type used. Barnyard manure and commercial fertilizers are needed
for top yields along with maintaining good organic matter content. 6
y\-•wfm
i •
In non-irrigated ares this soil is suited to winter wheat , barley and
,ror✓
sorghum. Most of the area is devoted to winter wheat which is alter-
nated with summer fallow to allow moisture accumulation. Normally,
precipitation is too low to make beneficial use of fertilizers.
Good cultural practices such as stubble mulch farming, strip cropping
and minimum tillage are needed to combat wind and water erosion. Terracing
may also be needed to control water erosion.
The potential native vegetation on this soil is dominated by blue grama.
Several midgrasses such as western wheatgrass and needle and thread are
also present. Potential production ranges from 1600 pounds per acre in
favorable years to 1000 pounds in unfavorable years. When range condition
deteriorates, the midgrasses decrease, blur grama, buffalograss, snakeweed,
yucca and fringed sage increase and production drops. Undesirable weeds
and annuals invade the site as range condition becomes poorer.
Management of vegetation on this soil should he based on taking half and
leaving half of the total annual production. Seeding is advisable if
range is in poor condition. Sideoats grama, little bluestem, western
wheatgrass , hlue grama, pubescent wheatgrass and crested wheatgrass are
suitable for seeding. The grass selected should meet the seasonal
requirements of livestock. For successful seeding, a clean , firm,
sorghum stubble--prepared the growing season prior to seeding--or a
firm, prepared seedbed and grass drill should be used. Early spring
seeding has proven most successful.
Windbreaks and environmental plantings are generally well suited on this
soil. Generally all trees and shrubs adapted to this area will grow.
. • •
Continued cultivation to control competing vegetation should be practiced
for as many years as possible following planting. Trees that are best
suited and have good survival are Rocky Mt. juniper, eastern redcedar,
ponderosa pine , Siberian elm, Russian olive and hackberry. Shrubs best
suited are skunkbush sumac , lilac , Siberian peashrub and American plum.
Wildlife is an important secondary use , with these soils best suited for
openland and rangeland wildlife. In cropland areas , habitat favorable for
ring-necked pheasants , mourning doves , and many non-game species can be
developed by establishing wildlife areas for nesting and escape cover.
For pheasants , the inclusion of undisturbed nesting cover is vital and
should be included in plans for habitat development: this is especially
true in areas of intensive agriculture. Rangeland wildlife , exemplified
by the pronghorn antelope, can be assisted and encouraged by development
of livestock watering facilities , proper livestock grazing management ,
and range reseeding where needed.
This Kim soil has a good potential for urban and recreational development.
Increased population growth in the area (county) has resulted in increased
home site construction. The primary limiting soil feature for urban
development and road construction is the sdils limited abil�o
support a load. Septic tank absorption fields will function properly,
however, community sewage systems ahould be provided if the population
density is increased. The permeability of the substratum may require
sewage lagoons to be sealed. Lawns , shrubs and trees for beautification
will do well.
Capability subclass IIIe irrigated
IVe nonirrigated
Loamy plains range site
1
.. fr. .. .
•
•
litit
lit
• N
Pr _
.I
h
M
•
>all _ a
I
N
a C3
>,..4
i
1 _
1 fir
# BIAS - .
b
;it' • _ lir
. 4
r
li
ri
Ili
& at.
�.
I
6 S
r •
File contains oversized
Plat map recorded at
Rec. No. 1771182, Book 849,
dated 10/27/1978
and oversized
Aerial Vicinity Map
See original File
Hello