The URL can be used to link to this page

Browse Search

Home My WebLink About760015.tiff RESOLUTION RE: GRANT OF A SPECIAL USE PERMIT FOR EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY, OPEN CUT MINING. WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on September 20, 1976, in the Chambers of the Board of County Commissioners , Weld County, Colorado, for the purpose of hearing the petition of Eastman Kodak Company, Windsor, Colorado, requesting a Special Use Permit for Open Cut Mining operations on a tract of land located in Section 33, Township 6 North, Range 67 West of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado, being more particularly described as follows : Beginning at the South Quarter Corner (S ti Cor) of the aforementioned Section 33 and considering the South line of the Southeast Quarter (SE1 ) of said Section 33 to bear S 89°21 '11" W and with all bearings herein relative thereto; thence N 7°38'42" W, a distance of 48.77 feet to a point on the North right-of- way line of County Road No. 62, said point being the True Point of Begin- ning; thence N 7°38'42" W, a distance of 51 .23 feet to a point; thence N 14°32' l5" W, a distance of 1 ,010.00 feet to a point; thence N 75°27'45" E, a distance of 318.00 feet to a point; thence S 63°29' 47" E, a distance of 847 .49 feet to a point; thence S 36°39'23" 14, a distance of 523. 19 feet to a point on the North right-of- way line of the aforementioned County Road No. 62; thence Along a curve to the right, having a central angle of 27°03'09" and a radius of 545.00 feet, a distance of 257.32 feet, to a point; thence S 63°42'32" W, a distance of 332.09 feet to a point, said point being the True Point of Beginning. The above described parcel contains 15.38 acres and is subject to all Ease- ments, Rights-of-way and Agreements now on record. WHEREAS, the petitioner was present, and WHEREAS, the above described parcel of land is located in an Agricultural Zone as set forth in the Weld County Zoning Resolution, and WHEREAS, Section 3 . 3 .E. 4 .d of the Weld County Zoning Resolution authorizes such a use in the Agricultural District on the grant of a Special Use Permit by the Board of County Commissioners , and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners has considered all the testimony and the statements of those present, studied the request of the petitioner and has studied the recommendation of the Weld County Planning Commission, and PLoa37 760015 BEFORE THE _D COUNTY , COLORADO PLANN COMMISSION RESOLUTION OF RECOMMENDATION TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Case No . SUP # 312 Date August 9, 1976 APPLICATION OF Eastman Kodak Company ADDRESS Windsor, CO 80550 Moved by John Weigand that the following resolution be introduced for passage by the Weld County Planning Commission : Be it Resolved by the Weld County Planning Commission that the application for site approval of Open Cut Mining Permit covering the following described property in Weld County , Colorado , to-wit : bI ATE OF COLORAr O _ ! See Attached a cup w N ,{ ,,,,F, ° 1 E , u ,V tr,t .,,.ry of Cow Ccrnm,w ner COUNTY CLERIC AND RECORDER UepUtY be recommended ( favorably ) Woopccontftd to theWrd o County Commissioners for the following reasons : 1 . The Request is in compliance with the Weld County Comprehensive Plan and the Weld County Extraction Plan, Mineral Resources Volume II. The area in question is non- irrigated. The Weld County Extraction Plan states that extraction shall be accomo- dated in non-irrigated areas so long as appropriate extraction and reclamation standards are followed. The extraction and reclamation standards are set forth which comply with County standards on the plats, 2. The Weld County Health Department has indicated the proposal is in compliance with the State Health Standards and regulations. 3. The Town of Windsor has indicated the town has no objections to the proposal . ADDITIONS TO EXTRACTION STANDARDS: 1 . Any new access onto County Road 62 shall be approved by the Weld County Engineering Department prior to installation. CHANGE TO RECLAMATION STANDARDS: 1 . Reclamation standard number 2 shall be changed to read, "Final slopes shall be 3:1 minimum." This is a result of a recommendation from the CO. Geological Survey. Motion seconded by J. Ben Nix Vote : For Passage Bill Elliott A)gm(imXkj( Passage J. Ben Nix Chuck Carlson Bette Kountz John Weigand Ronald Heitman Percy Hiatt The Chairman declared the Resolution passed and ordered that a certified copy be forwarded with the file of this case to the Board of County Commissioners for further proceedings . LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF ll PROPOSED BORROW AREAJ \,1U A parcel of land located in Section 33 , Township 6 North, Ve ` Range 67 West of the Sixth Principal Meridian , Weld County, , Colorado, being more particularly described as follows : Beginning at the South Quarter Corner (S 1/4 Cor) of the aforementioned Section 33 and considering the south line of the goutheast Quarter (SE 1/4) of said Section 33 to bear S 89 -21 '-11" W and with all bearings herein relative thereto; thence N 7°-38 ' -42" W, a distance of 48 . 77 feet to a point on the north right-of-way line of County Road No. 62 , said point being the True Point of Beginning; thence N 7°-38 ' -42" W, a distance of 51 . 23 feet to a point; thence N 14°-32 ' -15" W, a distance of 1 ,010 .00 feet to a point; thence O N 75 -27 '-45" E, a distance of 318 . 00 feet to a point; thence ° S 63 -29 ' -47" E, a distance of 847 . 49 feet to a point; thence N 36°-39 ' 23" W, a distance of 523 . 19 feet to a point on the north right-of-way line of the aforementioned County Road No. 62; thence Along a curve to the right , having a central angle of 27°-03 ' -09" and a radius of 545 . 00 feet, a distance of 257. 32 feet, to a point; thence S 63°-42 ' -32" W, a distance of 332 .09 feet to a point, said point being the True Point of Beginning. The above described parcel contains 15 . 38 acres and is subject to all Easements, Rights-of-Way and Agreements now on record. - . The Weld County Planning Commission held a scheduled meeting on August 2, 1976, at 9:00 A.M. , in the County Commissioners' Hearing Room, 1st Floor, Weld County Centennial Center, Greeley, Colorado Roll Call Was As Follows: Ronald Heitman Present Marge Yost Absent J. Ben Nix Present Chuck Carlson Present Bill Elliott Present Bette Kountz Present Percy Hiatt Present Harry Ashley Absent John Weigand Present County Commissioner Present: Norman Carlson Others Present Gary Z. Fortner, Director of Planning Kay McEver, Assistant County Attorney Tom Honn, Zoning Administrator Ken McWilliams, Assistant Zoning Administrator As a quorum was present, the meeting proceeded as scheduled. SUBJECT: Minutes MOTION: By Percy Hiatt, to approve minutes of July 20, 1976 as submitted. Seconded by Bill Elliott. A unanimous vote of "aye". MOTION CARRIED. APPLICANT: Richard Geisert Tape 632 (#_1848-2008) CASE NUMBER: Z-275 and S-123 LOCATION: Pt. Sec. 4 and Pt. Sec. 5 T5N R65W SUBJECT: "C" to "I-UD" and Preliminary Plat APPEARANCE: Gary Sears DISCUSSION: The Planning staff sent a letter to Denver to check on the mineral deposit on this property. This item was tabled at the July 20th, 1976, meeting. The Weld County Planning staff now recommends approval for the following reasons: 1 ) Although the Colorado Geo- logical Survey has indicated that the mineral deposit under the subject property is a deposit of commercial value, the Planning Commission staff does not feel that it is commercially feasible to extract the gravel resource for the following reasons: A) The existing land use (residential and commercial ) in the immediate area would not be compatible with gravel extraction on the subject property; B) Extraction would not be compatible with the existing zoning (Estate, Commercial and Industrial ) in the adjacent areas es- pecially with regards to the extensive Estate District located immediately to the north; and C) Development of a gravel pit operation Page 1307 , on the subject property would not be in conformance with the per- mitted uses proposed for the area under the City of Greeley Compre- hensive Plan. The subject property is proposed to be a light in- dustrial district. Gravel extraction is permitted only in conserva- tion districts; 2) The Weld County Utility Advisory Board has recommended approval of the utility plat on July 29, 1976; 3) The Weld County Health Department has indicated the subject area can support individual on-lot sewage disposal systems; 4) The Western Hills Fire Department has indicated they have no objections to the proposal provided the fire protection Provisions are followed as shown on the plans; 5) The Weld County Building Inspection Division indicated they have no objections provided there is adequate flood- proofing design for the proposed development and 6) the City of Greeley Planning Commission has recommended approval of the zone change and preliminary plat. Tom Hann explained that the uses would be listed in the County Zoning Regulations under both Commercial and Industrial Districts, but would have to be compatible with the City of Greeley' s light industrial zone regulations. Final Site Plans and Parking will have to be reviewed by the County and the City at time of submittal . Mr. Sears stated he has talked with the City some more, and there is good possibility that he will be making application to the City for sewer. RESOLUTION: Be it therefore resolved to recommend to the Weld County Board of County Commissioners approval of this request for a change of zone from "C" to "I-UD" . Motion by Tim Weigand . Seconded by J. Ben Nix . A vote of "AYE" by Elliott, Weigand, Heitman, Hiatt, Nix, and Kountz. MOTION CARRIED. RESOLUTION: Be it therefore resolved to recommend to the Board of County Commissioners approval of this Preliminary Plat. Motion by Weigand. Seconded by Bette Kountz. A vote of "Aye" by Elliott, Weigand, Heitman, Hiatt, Nix, and Kountz. MOTION CARRIED. APPLICANT: Earl Anderson PC 632 (#2008 - 2155) CASE NUMBER: SUP 313 LOCATION: Pt. NW4 Sec. 13 T6N R65W SUBJECT: Greyhound training track APPEARANCE: Earl Anderson DISCUSSION: Mr. Anderson explained that he has been in the business of training greyhounds for 10 years. It is a competitive business and he can't compete unless he is equiped to do so. Weld County Planning staff recommends approval for the following reasons: 1 ) The request is in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan in that it is compatible with the area and surrrounding land uses; 2) The Weld County Engineering Department indicated there were no anticipated engineering problems; 3) The Weld County Health Department has indicated that the proposed operation is in conformance with all applicable State Health Standards and regulations; 4) The Cache La Poudre Reservoir Company has indi- cated the ditch company has no objections to the greyhound training track; 5) The applicant has submitted a petition form signed by the majority of the surrounding property owners. Our office has not received any opposition from any of the remaining property owners in the area; and 6) The Soil Conservation Service has indicated the soils in the area pose no problems for the proposed operation. Page 1308 , Development standards were read into record. Mr. Anderson explained that the cost of this track (without ground) is approximately $20,000. There will be no expansion in the number of dogs. Other trainers in the area will also use the track. Traffic will not be increased by this track. Mr. Anderson explained that training will be com- pleted by 10:00 each morning because the dogs can't run in the heat of the day. The track will be used as long as possible except for months when the ground is frozen. There is no other facility like this in Colorado. This facility was approved for Mr. Anderson' s own use and has already been constructed. Construction was started last April . Mr. Anderson does not feel that this will encourage other breeders to come into this area. RESOLUTION: Be it therefore resolved to recommend to the Board of County Commissioners, approval of this request for a dog training track. Motion by Bill Elliott. Seconded by Percy Hiatt. A vote of "aye" by Elliott, Carlson, Weigand, Heitman, Hiatt, Nix, and Kountz. MOTION CARRIED. APPLICANT: Clarence Evers PC 632 (#2155-2250) CASE NUMBER: Z-267 LOCATION: Pt. SEq Sec. 3 T2N R68W SUBJECT: Extention of Zone Change "A" to "C" APPEARANCE: Clarence Evers DISCUSSION: Mr. Evers explained that the property was zoned "C" for only six months. Now he would like for it to be permanently zoned as Commercial . The property is for sale, but there is no specific plan for its use. Property all the way around it is zoned commercial . Ramada Inn is to the west of this property (Del Camino Area). Mr. Fortner explained that when this property was before the Commission several months ago it had been misrepresented as commercial several times because of the other zoning around it. Basically, there is no land there that can really be used for agricultural purposes. Weld County Planning staff recommends approval for the following reasons: 1 ) The original commercial zoning of the contiguous property to the east and a portion of this parcel did not conform to the proposed lines at the time of rezoning. (Part of the parcel was zoned C and part A); 2) The proposed change of zoning is com- patible with surrounding zoning which is all commercial ; and 3) The proposed change of zone would not effect the commercial value of any gravel deposits because of the small acreage involved and be- cause all surrounding zoning prohibits mineral extraction. RECOMMENDA- TION OF APPROVAL IS CONDITIONAL UPON: 1 ) The applicant shall sub- mit a final site plan and construction schedule to be reviewed by the Weld County Planning Commission and approved by the Board of County Commissioners prior to development on the subject property; 2) The applicant shall comply with all of the conditions under which the commercial zoning was granted except that the subject property shall have a permanent commercial zoning classification. Page 1309 RESOLUTION: Be it therefore resolved to recommend to the Board of County Commissioners approval of this request for permanent zoning subject to staff recommendations. Motion by J. Ben Nix. Mr. Fortner requested flexibility to enable staff to reword item #1 (in reasons for approval ) for clarity. He also wants to reword the conditions to the extent that they not only refer to the applicant, but to any purchaser of this property. Seconded by Percy Hiatt. A vote of "aye" by Elliott, Carlson, Weigand, Heitman, Hiatt, Nix, and Kountz. MOTION CARRIED. % APPLICANT: Eastman Kodak Company Tape 632 (#2250 - 2312) CASE NUMBER: Z-276 and SUP 312 LOCATION: Pt. Sec. 33 T6N R67W SUBJECT: Zone change "I" to "A-UD" and Open Cut Mining Permit APPEARANCE: Jim Mueller \. DISCUSSION: Mr. Mueller explained that this request is to allow Eastman Kodak to have an economical source of film material for future \ building. Comprises approximately 15 acres. While it will be a long term use, the actual period of time that work will be done is six to eight weeks. There will be three to eighteen month periods when no work at all is done. This is located in the bluffs along Kodak' s south property line. After completion of this project, approximately 10 acres will be used as irrigated farmland. No pit is involved. Water table will not be exposed. Mr. Mueller has recommendations from the Soil Conservation Service for seeding, topsoiling, etc. These recommendations are included on the plat, Weld County Planning staff recommends approval for the following �'' reasons: 1 ) The request is in compliance with the Weld County Cal- i\ prehensive Plan and the Weld County Extraction Plan, Mineral Resources Volume II. The area in question is non-irrigated. The Weld County Extraction Plan states that extraction shall be accomodated in non-irrigated areas so long as appropriate extraction and reclama- tion standards are followed. The extraction and reclamation stan- dards are set forth which comply with County standards on the plats; i 2) The Weld County Health Department has indicated the proposal is in compliance with the State Health Standards and regulations; and 3) The Town of Windsor has indicated the town has no objections to the proposal . ADDITIONS TO EXTRACTION STANDARDS: 1 ) Any new access onto County Road 62 shall be approved by the Weld County Engineering Department prior to installation. CHANGE TO RECLAMATION STANDARDS: 1 . Redlamation standard number 2 shall be changed to read, "Final slopes shall be 3: 1 minimum." This is a result of I a recommendation from the Colorado Geological Survey. ! RESOLUTION: Be it therefore resolved to recommend to the Board of County Commissioners approval of this zone change request from "I" to "A-UD" subject to staff recommendations. Motion by Chuck Carlson. Seconded, Bette Kountz. A vote of "aye" by Elliott, Carlson, Weigand, Heitman, Hiatt, Nix, and Kountz. MOTION CARRIED. RESOLUTION: Be it therefore resolved to recommend to the Board of County Commissioners approval of this special use permit request. Motion by John Weigand. Seconded by J. Ben Nix. A vote of "AYE" by Elliott, Carlson, Weigand, Heitman, Hiatt, Nix, and Kountz. MOTION CARRIED. Page 1310 APPLICANT: Sierra Investments PC 632 (#2312 - end) CASE NUMBER: Z-277 LOCATION: Pt. SWa SW1 Sec. 16 T5N R65W SUBJECT: "E" to "C" , Final Site Plan and Recorded Exemption APPEARANCE: Doug Sears DISCUSSION: Mr. Sears explained that this is the property at the intersection where Highway 34 will go east from U.S. 85 Bypass and 1st Avenue. There is just a little over 10 acres in the parcel . The Weld County and Greeley Comprehensive Plans do call for industrial useage in this area. Mike Nabors, McDoy Distributing, was with Mr. Sears. He is an intended user for one of the tracts. This is why application for Recorded Exemption is being made. Mr. Sears explained that it was the Planning staff' s recommendation to go through application for Recorded Exemption rather than platting the land. Weld County Planning staff recommends approval for the following reasons: 1 ) The requests comply with the Weld County Comprehensive Plan since the development is adjacent to the City of Greeley and the uses comply with those proposed in the City of Greeley Comprehensive Plan; 2) The City of Greeley has recommended approval of the requests; 3) The Weld County Health Department has indicated the soils in the area are suitable for individual sewage disposal systems; and 4) the Western Hills Fire Department has indi- cated they have no objections to the proposal . RECOMMENDATION OF APPROVAL IS CONDITIONAL UPON: 1 ) A guarantee that the developer is obtaining water from the City of Greeley and has an approved con- tract for water service and installation of the water line. The developer shall submit said contract to the Department of Planning Services prior to advertisement for the Board of County Commissioners' hearing; 2) The letter as submitted dated July 30, 1976, to be signed by McDoy Distributing Company and Sierra Investment Company prior to advertisement for the Board of County Commissioners' hearing and that portion of said letter in quotes be made a condition of approval in the resolution by the Board of County Commissioners; 3) The "Grant of Right-of-Way and Easement" and "Warrenty'Deed" documents being made a part of the approval by the Board of County Commissioners such that copies of the recorded instruments as attached be submitted to the files of the Planning Commission and Board of County Commissioners subsequent to recordation; 4) Limitation of access onto the future State Highway frontage road to two access points as requested by the State Department of Highways; and 5) Final approval from the City of Greeley on the drainage study submitted for Parcel A of the Recorded Exemption prior to advertisement for the Board of County Commissionrs ' hearing. COMMENT: The City of Evans gave no response to the referral sent to them on these requests by Sierra Investments Company. Mr. Sears explained that he was unaware of the requirement for contracting with the City of Greeley for water. The property is within and is being served by a viable water district. He questioned the legality of the County making this requirement. He explained that the City is expanding and picking up boundaries within the water district, but at present, Delta can serve the property. Page 1311 Mr. Honn explained that the applicant had named the City of Greeley as being the source of water. Proof that water is available is all that is necessary. John Watson, representing Industrial Acres, read letter dated July 30, 1976 into record. Industrial Acres strongly opposes rezoning a small piece of property such as this, without giving consideration to the entire area. They feel this is spot-zoning and is not in compliance with Weld County and the City of Greeley Comprehensive Plan. Jim Smith, partner in Industrial Acres, explained that he owns a parcel of land just to the north. He envisions the Planning Commission's role as one of not reacting to a certain situation, but one of leading forward. Basically, Industrial Acres was requesting to be rezoned at the same time as the property of Sierra Investments is. Mr. Heitman explained that the only reason Sierra Investments is being considered today is because they have a specific use in mind and have requested a change of zone. Industrial Acres has not made that type of application. Mr. Smith said it is conceiveable that Industrial Acres could be re- zonelas Residential because there is residential property to the north, or it could be rezoned as commercial because there is commercial property to the south. He feels that Industrial Acres needs a frame- work so they know where they fit in. He is concerned with what type of buffer will be used between properties. Roy Lundvall was also present as a partner in Industrial Acres. Mr. Sears stated that Mr. Watson was talking as though he is a very naive citizen of Weld County, when in fact he has served on the Planning Commission Board for a good many years. He stated that Mr. Watson most definitely knows what is going on because he helped to create the Weld County Comprehensive Plan. Mr. Sears explained that he had an informal conversation with the partners from Industrial Acres prior to this hearing. RESOLUTION: Be it therefore resolved to recommend to the Board of County Commissioners approval of this request for change of zone. Motion by J. Ben Nix. Seconded by Chuck Carlson. A vote of "aye" by Elliott, Carlson, Weigand, Heitman, Hiatt, Nix, and Elliott. MOTION CARRIED. RESOLUTION: Be it therefore resolved to recommend to the Board of County Commissioners approval of this request for a Recorded Exemption. Motion by J. Ben NIx. Seconded by Bette Kountz. A vote of "aye" by Elliott, Carlson, Weigand, Heitman, Hiatt, Nix, and Elliott. MOTION CARRIED. Page 1312 RESOLUTION: Be it therefore resolved to recommend to the Board of County Commissioners approval of this Final Site Plan. Motion by J. Ben Nix. Seconded by Bette Kountz. A vote of "aye" by Elliott, Carlson, Weigand, Heitman, Hiatt, Nix, and Kountz. MOTION CARRIED. APPLICANT: Amoco Production Company PC Tape 633 (# 57 - 961 ) CASE NUMBER: SUP 314 LOCATION: Pt. Sec. 34 T2N R67W SUBJECT: Gas Processing Facility Expansion APPEARANCE: John Lang, Harry Hickman, and Robert Chinaud DISCUSSION: Mr. Lang gave a lenghty presentation of the request. The plant is located about 4 miles west and z mile north of the Town of Ft. Lupton at the intersection of County Roads 14 and 19. Natural Gas which is produced with oil from the spindle and single tree fields is processed here. Liquids which are removed from the gas include ethane, propane, butane and pintane +. These liquids are removed and stabilized and put in a surge tank where they are then delivered from the plant by pipeline. All liquids leave the plant in a mixed stream. The residue gas is sold to Colorado Interstate Gas Company. It also leaves the plant by a buried pipeline. Plant is designed as a completely closed system. There are no specific odors connected with the process. All compressor units are equiped with exhaust silencers and compressor buildings are completed with noise insulation. Proposed addition to the plant involves the addition of six compressors and some plant processing equipment. The plant processing equipment would increase the plant capacity approximately twelve million cubic feet per day. The new equipment is indicated to be parallel to existing equipment. Plant is operated on a round- the-clock basis. Water is supplied by a water well at a plant site in the vicinity of the plant office. No expansion oR the water supply will -be required. No additional road requirements are necessary as a result of this proposed expansion. Robert Chinaud, Engineering Dynamics Incorporated, was consulted by Amoco to survey the noise increase. The new compressors will actually be farther away from the existing residences. The survey shows the existing noise level at 53 decibels. The increase in compressors would create an increase of 2 decibels in noise level . Mr. Lang explained that acoustical barriers can be installed on the stacks of the compressors to help with the noise problem. Dr. Chinaud will be designing these barriers. Planning Commission staff indicated that it would be desirable to have some type of screening on the site. Mr. Lang explained that the site is well maintained and is actually weed free. Mr. Lang also explained that trees had been planted on the site in the past, but when the site was sprayed to kill the weeds, the spray also killed the trees. Page 1313 Weld County Planning Commission staff recommends the request be tabled for the following reasons: 1 ) Letters of opposition to this proposed expansion have been received from August Gittlein, William Gittlein, and Mr. and Mrs. Sheldon Sickler. Copies of those letters are included in an attached packet; 2) Noise has been identified as one of the problems in the area by the surround- ing property owners. The Planning Commission staff has requested a noise study be done which would indicate: A. The noise level of the existng operation; B. The noise level of the facility with the proposed expansion; and C. How these noise levels com- pare with acceptable noise level ratings at the perimeter of the Special Use Permit area and also at the nearby residences. The requested noise study has not been presented to date; 3) In December, 1972 when the Special Use Permit was granted for the original facility, there was to be a landscape screen planted around the perimeter of the area. According to Amoco, trees were planted, but later died from a dust applied to control weeds on the internal area of the facility. The Planning Commission staff has requested the applicant to develop a landscape plan for visual and noise screening purposes to be plantediaround the perimeter of the Special Use Permit area to be in compliance with the recommendation of the Soil Conservation Service. This has not been done to date; and 4) Another sheet to the Special Use Permit plans needs to be submitted to include the proper certificates and development standards. William Gittlein was present. He lives on Road 19 just south of the plant. He was concerned about the noise, dust and traffic. He stated that a good percentage of the traffic is related to the plant. Dr. -Chinaud explained his ideas for designing noise barriers. He stated that the increase in noise would not be very detectable with the addition of new compressors. RESOLUTION: Be it therefore resolved to recommend to the Board of County Commissioners approval of this request, subject to the noise levels being improved. Motion by Bill Elliott. Seconded by Percy Hiatt. A vote of "aye" by Elliott, Carlson, Weigand, Heitman, Hiatt, Nix, and Kountz. MOTION CARRIED. RESOLUTION: Be it therefore resolved to recommend to the Board of County Commissioners that the Noise Level Report be updated. Motion by John Weigand. Seconded by Mr. Nix. A vote of "aye" by Elliott, Carlson, Weigand, Heitman, Hiatt, Nix, and Kountz. MOTION CARRIED. APPLICANT: M.G. and Della Linson PC Tape 633 (#961 - 1230) CASE NUMBER: CUP 19 LOCATION: Pt. SW4 Sec. 5 T3N R68W SUBJECT: Single Family Residence APPEANCE: Mr. Linson Page 1314 DISCUSSION: This item was tabled at the July 20, 1976 Planning Commission meeting, Mr. Linson has submitted a letter from Carol Lee to the Planning Commission attempting to establish that Mr. Linson was doing as he had been instructed during the time that Ms. Lee was Zoning Administrator. The Weld County Planning staff recommends denial for the following reasons: 1 ) The proposal at hand is inconsistent with the Weld County Comprehensive Plan. The Plan states that agriculture is a resource in Weld County which must be protected from the impacts of urban growth. To accomplish this objective, the plan states that urban residential , commercial , and industrial uses will be encouraged, to located around existing urban centers so that their impacts will be minimized, and so that the cost of providing the services associated with such uses will be minimized to the greatest extent possible. Inthe pending proposal , the pro- posed use is not an agriculturally related use, but is an urban residential use proposed for a predominately agricultural area . The proposal sets forth no evidence that the use is related to in- tended agricultural uses of the land in question. The subject property is in fact one of several approximately 35-acre parcels which were split out of the SA of Section 5, Township 3 North, Range 68 West of the 6th P.M. , since 1972 when said quarter section was one agricultural unit. The land in question consists primarily of Class II soils which are classified as prime agricultural soils by the Soil Conservation Service. The area could easily support agricultural uses if urban encroachment on the land does not occur; 2) The granting of this request would enhance the conflict between basically incompatible uses, i . e. the traditional conflicts between urban and agricultural uses; 3) If such urban residential uses, as proposed in the pending appl4cation are allowed to occur, the cost of providing services to such rural areas can only be increased , thus resulting in over- all increased costs to the taxpayer. As stated by the Weld county Comprehensive Plan, such uses should be encouraged to locate around existing urban centers, where the base for providing such services is already established; and 4) Finally, if such development is encouraged, more and more agricultural lands will be split into parcels which are basically too small to support viable farm operations, and too large to be maintained properly by those who work in the city but live in the country. As a result of the latter factor, additional conflicts with surrounding agricultural uses occur. Tom Honn explained that the Planning Commission staff has not been able to understand where the deeds describing the property match the description submitted by Carol Lee. The property itself is not divided by the ditches. RESOLUTION: Be it therefore resolved to recommend to the Board of County Commisisoners denial of this request based on staff recommendations. Motion by J. Ben Nix. Seconded by Bette Kountz. A vote of "aye" by Elliott, Carlson, Weigand, Heitman, Hiatt, Nix. and Kountz. MOTION CARRIED. Page 1315 Mr. Linson then asked if he could make a trade-off with Loffsinger for some land in Mead would he be able to obtain a single family residence. The trade-off would bring his property up to 70 acres. He explained that he still feels like he is taking the rapp for a mistake that was made by County offices. Meeting adjourned. Respectfully submitted, '-2-Z2zy,/,-„i ..1)1, -4-',',--1.---I Janna S. Morrow Secretary Page 1316 CASE NUMBER : Z-216 and SUP 312 LOCATION : _2 mi . S of Windsor P . S1/2 Sec. 33 T6N R67W R E Q U E S T;`'.,, oz (I & S to A-UD) and Open Cut Mining Permi t NAME 'i$4:'i:,, Eastman Kodak Company 19 . THE l�i:Ei GOUNTI PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT THIS REQUP,STi"BE approved FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS : 1 . The request is in compliance with the Weld County Comprehensive Plan and the Weld County Extraction Plan, Mineral Resources Volume II . The area in question is non-irrigated. The Weld County Extraction Plan states that extraction shall be accomodated in non-irrigated areas so long as appropriate extraction and reclamation standards are followed. The extraction and reclamation standards are set forth which comply with County standards on the plats. 2. The Weld County Health Department has indicated the proposal is in com- pliance with the State Health Standards and regulations. 3. The Town of Windsor has indicated the town has no objections to the pro- posal . ADDITIONS TO EXTRACTION STANDARDS: 1 . Any new access onto County Road 62 shall be approved by the Weld County Engineering Department prior to installation. CHANGE TO RECLAMATION STANDARDS: 1 . Reclamation standard number 2 shall be changed to read, "Final slopes shall be 3:1 minimum. " This is a result of a recommendation from the Colorado Geological Survey. 20 . PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION : PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES : DATE : 21 . COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ' ACTION : COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ' MINUTES : DATE : 22 . DATE : STAFF : B. Upon completion of the reclamation plan as outlined in the open cut mining permit, Kodak Colorado Division must initiate a re- zoning procedure in order to revert the zoning back to Scientific and Industrial . Said rezoning request shall be reviewed by the Weld County Planning Commission for their recommendation and by Board of County Commissioners for their approval . • DATE: August 12, 1976 TO : Tilt? 13o,,ird of county Commission ers Weld County , Colorado • FROM: Clerk to the Board Office Commissioners : • If you have no objections , we have tentatively set the following hearing for the 20th of September, 1976, 2:00 PM : • Thomas E. Martinez and Florinda T. Pesina, dba Pesina's Cafe, 3.2 beer license Earl Anderson, SUP, Greyhound Training Track Richard Geisert, COZ, C to I-UD and Preliminary Plat Rick Hertzke, SUP, Dairy Farm and residence Eastman Kodak Co. , COZ, I to A-UD and SUP, Open cut mining permit Clarence Evers, COZ, A to C • Sierra Investments, COZ, E to C, Site Plan and Recorded Exemption Amoco Production Company, SUP, Expansion of gas processing plant OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD B ,[1./-y � .� � uty The above mentioned hearing date and hearing time may be scheduled on the agenda as stated above : HOARD Cr COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY, COLORADO 9e6?6€-? „1/‘e--)..e-fr-)-zokg--/ 1 1� • July 13, 1976 Mr. Ken McWilliams Assistant Zoning Administrator Department of Planning Services 915 10th Street Greeley, Colorado 80631 Re: Request for rezoning and open cut mining permit on a parcel of land described as part of Section 33, T6N, R67W of the 6th P .M. , Weld County, Colorado Dear Mr. McWilliams : In your letter of July 8 , 1976 , to Mr. J. C. Turk you requested a letter addressing the following subjects : a. Kodak 's rights to the subject minerals; b. A statement on liability insurance; and c. Authorization for J. C. Turk to sign the application and associated documents for Eastman Kodak Company. We have reviewed the appropriate abstracts and Eastman Kodak Company is the owner of all minerals on the subject property. I enclose for your files a certificate of insurance evidencing $1,000 ,000 coverage. J. C. Turk has been authorized by Eastman Kodak Company management to sign the subject application and associated documents on behalf of the company. I understand that Mr. Mueller is considering with you the question of whether we have already paid the $10 recording fee mentioned in your letter. I assume that the above in all other respects is sufficient for your purposes. Thank you for your consideration in the matter. Very truly yours , D. -. er Regional Counsel DJH:mn Enc. EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY • LEGAL DEPARTMENT WINDSOR, COLORADO 80550 • 303 686-7611 Y , 4 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES y f WELD COUNTY CENTENNIAL CENTER 915 10th STREET GREELEY,COLORADO 80631 GARY Z. FORTNER DIRECTOR OF PLANNING Wil I : .O PHONE (303) 356-4000, EXT 400 COLORADO July 8, 1976 J. C. Turk Superintendent, Facilities Eastman Kodak Company Windsor, Colorado 80551 Re: Request for rezoning and open cut mining permit on a parcel of land described as part of Section 33, T6N, R67W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado Dear Mr. Turk: Your applications and related materials for the above described requests are complete and in order with the following exceptions: 1 . A letter from your legal counsel addressing: a. Kodak' s rights to the subject minerals; b. A statement on liability insurance; c. Authorization for you, J.C. Turk, to sign the appli- cation and associated documents for Eastman Kodak Company; and 2. Payment of the recording fee for the plats which is $10.00. Please make this payable to the Clerk and Recorder, but submit it to our office. I have tentatively scheduled the hearing before the Weld County Planning Commission for August 3, 1976. Respectfully, ) , Ken McWilliams Assistant Zoning Administrator WELD COUNTY COMMISSIONERS jsm GLENN K BILLINGS VICTOR JACOBUCCI cc: Jim Mueller ROYMOSER NORMAN CARLSON JUNE STEINMARK z itLu LHLCK FILING NUMBER ,:i '7/, e •r :if--) , 9 NAME )\)_arjn r REQUEST I-1 e ?1,-,A, ,,x-r V- -'A- %•Y'l; ---1 (,= 'is'ti: ,-' L 1-)$' -1: ) /-� f-,.. LEGAL DISCRIPTION qTh SC 3 `-; - (, .- __ LAND USE N 71) E !i S f; W I, ZONING N LOCATION ,`,17 ),--)1/ , � . E 'S- `\ r. ,' ''t '\c{' Su - S w COMMENTS :/. t" ,? 1'1h-Ec4,_'-/t/•e4/1{\--t_-, -- / ` e ij / ,...„-:.. .,,,t..-t,,L,.++ \ 1 �J { ',,,,,fr ,rsk t 7- --....- APPLICANT' ' - i, k REQUES 1: C',,,, , , ' , y' . ' ,_ * 4 f I", ' ' TIME- DATE I INITIALS ' SPENT APPLICATION RECEIVED `4 7i7/ I i-I.�'/ i V,-'- , FILING FEE iii /t RECORDING FEE 9/2-2/ I 7-5-7://:1 ----- ' APPLICATION REVIEWED APPLICATION INCOMPLETE/COMPLETE j�'-,;;,- y ,, ---- P. C. HEARING DATE - APPLICANT NOTIFIED =-/:I;,//-// ,/(' 7-.,-/i/(1 ,/ REFERRALS LISTED -7)/7/ X/ .V -/ SENT TO EXECUTIVE SECRETARY ?/2'/7( ,f./_`,J - -- - FILE ASSEMBLED/REFERRALS MAILED ! ?/')( c /AAJ PUBLICATION NOTICE SENT TO DRAFTING DEPARTMENT f 9 t--rN ,r\ SIGN FOR P.C. MEETING PREPARED -__-- - -- SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS 7//a /t-ir AIRPHOTO/VICINITY MAP -7//c A -1 j SENT TO COUNTY ATTORNEY ;,1 :- J ' 1 Li .- - APPROVAL OF COUNTY ATTORNEY "J/1 (' ') ‘/- PUBLICATION BY: 1 SIGN POSTED BY: ,i -,.- Posted: — - --- - - SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS NOTIFIED BY: 7/„,271-74 77,1-c5 '),;"-il?"..” /1( FIELD CHECK AND REPORT !'a -a ‘ k v-, I REFERRALS: COMPLETE/INCOMPLETE - 1),-.)cO: -, ' i ',/ -- CCf1i�1EfdTS �� , PRELIMINARY STAFF COMMENTS . '/-?:, /L ',/, (' I/ -; STAFF CONFERENCE .7/=.7 . , ';/j" 4/_3 STAFF COMMENTS ---�' r- /L'�,%'/ 1 P.C. HEARING ACTION: /'' ,/ ):-/ ,�, <',/ ;i,/";' - P.C. RESOLUTION , � " f ' , ' " CASE SENT TO CLERK TO BOARD A:/ / )'(/ -- SIGN POSTED /: f(- _ - - - - - - C.C. HEARING q.a7ZACTION %,,,,,„...t.Q.d, C.C. ,RESOLUTION RECEIVED q.2 .7/O „ HISTORY CARD COMPLETE g Pc? C.C. RESOLUTION SENT TO DRAFTING q• - 'o pR DRAFTED ON MYLAR k: , DOCUMENT SENT TO CLERK 84 RECORDER P.C. MINUTES S 27o LS CASE/FILE COMPLETE •S WELD COUNTY, COLORADO SPECIAL USE APPLICATION For OPEN CUT MINE PERMIT (gravel pits, etc. ) ° Weld County Planning Commission 1516 Hospital Road, Greeley, CO For ZONING DEPARTMENT Use Only Case Number: ,,61.) P P 3,) V.76; /r1 Applicant: PC Hearing Date: `jA /A1 CC Hearing Date: Section: , Township: North, Range: West Zoning District: Acreage Involved: Permi t Fee: A frzl, ,ce, f'2 Reyei pt Number; 77420 /Ip pt, 74 - Legal Description Approved By `� , Weld'County At Site Entrance/Exit Points and Off-Site Transportation Routes Approved By , Weld County Engineer Recommended Road/Bridge Fee: /Not Required . Refer To: 1 ) Date: 2) Date: 3) Date: 4) Date: 5) Date: Application Reviewed By Weld County Zoning Department To Be Completed By APPLICANT In Accordance With Procedural Guide Require- ments: 1 . I (we), the undersigned, hereby request a hearing before the Weld County Planning Commission concerning a proposed Open Cut Borrow Pit (gravel , coal , borrow pit, etc. ) mining operation for the following described unincor- porated area of Weld County: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: .A parcel of land situated in Section 33 , Township 6 North, Range 67 West of the 6th Principal Meridian, Weld County, Colorado being more particularly described on attached plans and documents TOTAL ACREAGE: • 2. Surface owner(s) of area of land described Name: Eastman Kodak Co. Address: Windsor, CO Phone: 686-7611 Name: Address: Phone: 3. Owner(s) of mineral rights to substance to be mined Name: Eastman Kodak Co. Address: Windsor, CO Phone: 686-7611 Name: Address: Phone: 4. Source of applicants Legal Right to enter and to mine on the land de-- scribed: Owners in Fee Simple (Attach Certified Copy of any Document noted to the Back of This Form) Filed in Weld County Clerk' s Office on August 5 , 1969 . Reception No. 1534947 1 �yi 5. Address of applicant and general office Applicants address: Windsor, Colorado 80551 Phone: 686-7611 General Office address: Phone: 6. Identify any prior permits for open cut mining held by applicant or affiliated person: None 7. Description of Operation a. Types and number of operating and processing equipment to be employed: Only those vehicles necessary for stripping, loading and hauling will be used at the site. • 8 :00 am b. Maximum number of employees: -- , and number of shifts: 1 shift to 5 :00 pm c. Number of stages to be worked: -- , and periods of time each is to be worked: Stages will depend on expansion of Kodak site - tentative schedule is attached. d. Thickness of mineral deposit: 20d feet, and thickness of the over- burden: 0. 5 ' -2. 0 ' e. This will be a /dry pit operation • f. Site entrance/exit points and county roads and bridges to be utilized between site and delivery point(s) (must be coordinated with County Engineer): C.R. Rd. No. 62 will be utilized - no county bridges are involved. 8. Description of Rehabilitation a. Proposed rehabilitation land use(s) : Irrigated farmland b. Source of technical advice for reclamation: u.s . Soil conservation Service c. Explanation of Reclamation Process: Refer to attached recommendations with particular emphasis on Alternative No. 2 . . I hereby depose and state under the penalities of perjury that all state- ments, proposals and/or plans submitted with or contained within this applica- tion are true ana correct to the best of my knowledge. COUNTY OF Weld STATE OF Colorado Sign4g e: cow er/Authorized Agent Subscribed and sworn to before me this /6 6tY day of'.___ L1 z-. / l'. 19' �7(r. • ;. � •cy,) (7,97_ , NOT RY PUBLIC SEAL My Commission expires \,_ ,Gct,e__ `-/ //q//42 PROJECT DESCRIPTION INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES WASTEWATER TREATMENT UPGRADE FOR KODAK COLORADO DIVISION, EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY BACKGROUND The Kodak Colorado Division (Kodak) at Windsor, Colorado provides treatment of industrial wastewater in a dual- powered aerated lagoon system followed by mixed media filtra- tion. The filtered effluent is discharged to the Cache La Poudre River in accordance with an existing NPDES permit. The lagoons are operated in series to provide aeration for oxidation of organics followed by settling of suspended solids . Each lagoon is lined with a single layer of EPDM membrane. The liners, which have been in use for more than 15 years , have experienced occasional incidents when gas would collect and cause localized floating of a membrane. In addition, the unprotected membranes are subject to punc- ture at or near the water surface when aerators or mixers are removed for repair. Slumping of the lagoon banks under the liners has also started to occur in specific areas, which if left unchecked, would create excessive stresses in the membrane. Kodak has undertaken a project to rehabilitate the existing lagoons to correct these conditions and minimize future maintenance requirements. The project site plan showing the location of the treatment facility and borrow area is presented in Drawing EW 00XX-010-002 . PROJECT SCOPE The project consists of rehabilitation of the two existing lagoons and construction of a new lagoon (Lagoon No. 3) as shown on Drawing EW 00XX-011-006 . The new lagoon is designed with two cells with floating aerators to provide aeration for removal of the wastewater organics . The cells will normally be operated in parallel with the influent divided equally in a new concrete flow splitter box. Adequate volume will be provided in each cell so that either may be taken out of service temporarily for repair as necessary without interrupting the treatment process. The lagoon lining will consist of a double layer of HDPE membrane separated by HDPE geonet. The secondary (lower) liner will be supported by HDPE geonet placed over a geo- textile. The lining systems will be installed on a compacted clay base. Bottom and side slopes are designed to permit escape of any gas bubbles that may form and prevent slumping of the embankment. ',1AR 9 1989 DEN/110R/027 1 A Each existing lagoon will be rehabilitated by removing the EPDM liner, regrading and recompacting the clay bottom and stabilizing of the berms to prevent slumping. The lagoons will then be lined with the same dual liner system used for Lagoon No. 3 . Additionally, a new berm will be installed in Lagoon No. 2 to reduce the effective storage volume as recommended for dual-power lagoons. A new building will be constructed near the south edge of Lagoon No. 3 to house the motor control center, pump controls, and process analyzers for the treatment system. The project also includes the construction of pump sumps and underground piping systems to convey water from Lagoon No. 3 to the settling lagoons. Earth for the new berms will be obtained from a borrow area located at the south side of Kodak' s property west of C257 as shown on the site plan. The borrow area consists of a hillside south of the Cache La Poudre River flood plain as shown on Drawing EW00XX-011-007. The earth, which will be used as general embankment fill , will be hauled in trucks to the treatment lagoons. Upon completion of the project, the borrow area will be graded to the slopes shown on the drawing to provide drainage and prevent ponding of stormwater runoff. DEN/110R/027 2 w Referrals Kodak Z-276 and SUP 312 lib County Attorney t1/67 County Engineer —:14- County Health / Colorado Geological Survey r%i Windsor Planning Commission Planning Commission Member - Harry Ashley -- C { f t�,[ �Y, ''�'----- - { � r CO LO DO' ;f WELD COUNTY PLAN ' . CO?/.7.1'StSION G%-'2 COLO:, 915 10th Street July 8, 1976 r- C.,�irrm �iiridsor� Planning Commission Windsor, Colorado 80550 TO ',;HCM iT MAY CC CSR;;: ., 4 + Enclosed is an application from Eastman Kodak Company fora Special Use Permit for an open cut mine and_a zone change from Scientific and Industrial to Agricultural Unit Development This item will be (,card afore the Weld County Planning C( IiIS . ion on August 3, 1976 . If you hav•_ any comments or s,,,,ye.,tions, r ^' may we please hear from you before July 20, 1976 . The location of the parcel of land for which tnis application has been sJc:,„itte6 is Pt. Sec. 33 T6N R67W • If no co,w,,ants are received by July 20, 1976 . t will be assued you have no objections and wish to make Ho comments with refer- ence to either the granting or denial of this application . Thank you. Kenneth McWilliams bscjtmit,Zoning Administrator • 1' LD r i (.,��-q y; WELD COUNTY PLAN•:'t : COMMISSION (31-z 915 10th Street ... July 8, 1976 Harry S. Ashley • Windsor 1st Nat'l . Bank Windsor, Colorado 8. 560 -a TO WHOM IT NAY j _,.clus,_d is an application from Eastman Kodak Company • fora Special Use Permit for an open cut mine and a zone change from • Scientific and Industrial to Agricultural Unit Development Tans ite,, ,;ill be neard before the Weld County Planning CL .;.I ission on August 3, 1976 . If you hav•_ any comments or cuyestions, f`� may we please hear from you before July 20, 1976 . The location of the parcel of land for which this application has been submitted is Pt. Sec. 33 T6N R67W • if no cc:.,,,ents are received by July 20, 1976 _ : z will be assu,7:ed you have no objections and wish to make no comiaen,.s with refer- ence to either the granting or denial of this application. Thank you. • Kenneth McWilliams bc.jsut rltsZaning Administrator • • Y SRT a.. ^mss „ inn) L.,O UMW-, Q ,\o1o) WELD COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION _ 915 10th Street • TO: Glen Paul , Director Environmental Health Services FROM: Gary Fortner, Director of Planning Planning Commission DATE: July 8, 1976 SUBJECT: Zone change and Special Use Permit for Eastman Kodak Company The enclosed application is submitted for your evaluation with reference to its compliance with County and State Health Department ` Regulations. If additional information is required for such evaluation, please notify our office as soon as possible. In addition, we would request that your office notify the Planning Commission of any permits required by County and/or State Health Department Regulations with reference to the proposed use, so that the applicant can be made aware of such requirements. We would appreciate receiving your evaluation and comment on the proposed use and/or facilities on or before July 30, 1976 so that we can address, and hopefully resolve, ay problems prior to con- sideration of the case by the Weld County Planning Commission on August 3, 1976 Thank you very much for your efforts in this matter. ,21a4 /1. 1.efb Gary Fort r .l; CC i cR .D WELD COUNTY PLAN ' CON,M!75ION -r G' E:Lt_'/.COLD'. P 915 10th Street WWI July 8, 1976 • • Fruilk :.+A.611 County Engineer TO 1,:110,' IT F',AY CMCERN: J Enclosed is an application from Eastman Kodak Comuany_ for a Special Use Permit for an open cut mine and a zone change from • Scientific and Industrial to Agricultural Unit Development This to , .ri l be heard before the ,'iel h County Planning Cr ,,,mission on August 3, 1976 . If you hav•_ any ca.:L.ents or :,,,c;cstions , may we please hear from you before July 20, 1976 • The location �.. of the parcel of land for which tnis application has been saomitteo is Pt. Sec. 33 T6N R67W if no com: ants are received by July 20, 1976 - . t will be assu,aed you have no o'b:,ections and wish to make no coTmen.s with refer- ence to either the granting or denial cf this application. 1 • Thank you. • r Kenneth I'lc':!i 11 iams Rp.,1 _M1,Zoning Administrator fflEORRflDUffl To Planning Commission Date July 27 , 1976 COLORADO From Engineering Department Kodak S . U . P . , Change of Zone-open cut mine subject: This office would request that all loads hauled on County Road 62 be of legal weights and that any new access to County Road 62 be approved prior to installation . Borrow area limits should be restricted to protect any erosion to the present R. O. W . and/or any existing fence posts . Gilman E . Olson mfm Weld BOARD OF HEALTH iVV ec County Health ,department CATHERINE BENSON. AULT FRANKLIN D YODER, MD, MPH 1516 HOSPITAL ROAD RALPH AAB GREELEY DIRECTOR GREELEY, COLORADO 80631 WILLIAM BL!GK. ROGGEN CLARENCE SITZMAN. GREELEY (303) 353-0540 DAVID WERKING, DOS. GREELEY July 27, 1976 Mr. Gary Fortner, Director Weld County Planning Commission Weld County Centennial Center 915-10th Street Greeley, CO 80631 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: We recommend approval Zone Change and Special Use Permit for Eastman Kodak Co. , Windsor, Colorado in Section 33, Township 6 North, Range 67 West of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado, provided it is not near the river with the possibility the tailing will not muddy the rivers or near groundwater. Sincerely, G e E. Paul, irec or Environmental Health Services GEP:dr cc Eastman Kodak Company • March 16 , 1976 - Mr. James L. Mueller • Kodak Colorado Division C-ST Windsor, Colorado 80551 Dear Mr. Mueller: The B. H. Eaton Ditch Company does not object to work being done by Weld County or Eastman Kodak Company in the area of the ditch located 1. 5 miles South of Kodak Road and West approximately 11 mile. It is understood the proposed project will not interfere with the operation of the B. H. Eaton Ditch. /2 /)/ W. Wayne Miller President B. H. Eaton Ditch Co. WWM: lk lk • `t i4' � !_ D C ! f'rir2- - CO LC •`.LLD COUNTY PL/IN' " CO:M S_ilON G'r C:Lti.CoLo 915 10th Street July 8, 1976 Dava Shelton Colorado Geological Survey 2..4 Columbine Building 1345 Sherman Street Denve@, Colorado 30203 TO !';h0W IT MAY CCCERN:l=nciosed is an application from Eastman Kodak Company — ' fora Special Use Permit for an open cut mine and a zone chaage_from - Scientific and Industrial to Agricultural Unit Development This i te,, wi i l b. heard before the Weld County Planning Cr _mission on August 3, 1976 . If you have any co:: .cnts or •-„,;e.,ticns , r,ay we please hear from you before July 20. 1926 . The l oco a on p.• of the parcel of land for which tnis application has been suc;,ittea is Pt. Sec. 33 T6N R67W if no cc.r:,,ants are received by July 20, 1976 . t will be assn ed you have no objections and wish to make no co mments V. ,th refer- C immmminim once to e tner the granting or denial of this application. Thank you. Kenneth McWilliams ,1\_sscj,c): n,sZoning Administrator eV Ceti V„,,9100 t4:19Ped RICHARD D LAMM JOHN W. ROLD yxr*Vi � GOVERNOR .+ Director COLORADO GEOLOGICAL SURVEY DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES ROOM 703 ' "`^ 1313 SHERMAN STREET DENVER, COLORADO 80203 PHONE 892-2611 July 19, 1976 Mr. Kenneth McWilliams Weld County Planning Commission 915 10th Street Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Ken: RE: KODAK SPECIAL-USE PERMIT A—UD This letter is in response to the Kodak Co.'s application for mining in SE 1/4 sec. 33, T. 6N. , R. 67 W. , 2.5 miles south of Windsor. This 26-acre site lies in an area I had not mapped as a gravel resource on the Colorado Geological Survey sand and gravel resources map of the Windsor quadrangle. There are indications of small gravel deposits along the river bluffs, but they are typically very small, spotty in occurrence, and covered by substantial overburden. Therefore, I did not consider them significant or economic deposits. What Kodak plans to mine is fill or embankment material, which, as I see it, consists of colluvium or slope debris and underlying bedrock (Pierre Shale) . The transitional Pierre in this area consists of interbedded shales and sandstones. Unless the excavation proceeds into a dominantly sand phase, there is a possibility of failure on the southern slopes in the later stages of the operation. The reclamation plan shows the final cut slopes of 40 percent on the south end of the excavation. Pierre Shale by itself cannot tolerate slopes this steep. Even with interbedded sandstones, failure could result at the slope top--either from natural watering or from excess watering during the reclamation phase. Although any failure here would likely be small, it could result in excess siltation in Eaton Ditch or remotely even physically damage the ditch itself. My recommendation is to ask Kodak to address this slope stability problem as it relates to existing and final drainage into and across the site, bedrock lithology and grade of final cut slopes, and the frequency and magnitude of watering during the reseeding phase. If I can be of further assistance in this matter, please contact me. Sincerely, ( Stephen D. Schwochow Engineering Geologist SDS/jp GEOLOGY STORY OF THE PAST . . . KEY TO THE FUTURE •Y C•''aY f. -e COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH 4210 EAST 11TH AVENUE • DENVER, COLORADO 80220 • PHONE 388-6111 Edward G. Dreyfus, M.D., M.P.H.:Executive Director March 11, 1976 Mr. Jim Mueller Kodak Colorado Division Windsor, Colorado 80551 Re: Barrow Pit Dear Mr. Mueller: After discussing the proposed barrow pit with you, I am convinced that no harm will come to waters of the State of Colorado via the barrow pit. As long as it is not near the water, in the flood plain, or near groundwater, no permit will be required from the Division. Very truly yours, FOR DIRECTOR, WATER QUALITY CONTROL DIVISION 767- !/-z2 William B. Heller District Engineer WBH:dec cc: District Engineer Divisional Correspondence Only STATE OF COLORADO - DIVISION OF WILDLIFE DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES DATE: 3/19/76 TO: Pete Barrows FROM: Don Bogart RE: Eastman-Kodak -- Clay Mining Project • This project will involve 26.15 acres of land situated in SE', S33, T6N, R67W, Weld County. • The materials to be removed are clayey sands to be used in construction sites. The impact on wildlife will be minimal. The species involved are small rodents and rabbits (both cottontail and jackrabbits) and not in too great numbers. There is a prairie dog colony just to the east of the area to be mined, but as near as could be determined there are none on the site. There are no threatened or endangered species involved in the area. Reclamation plans include grading the area and reseeding with Crested Wheatgrass or pubescent wheatgrass as recommended by the SCS. The lower or north end of the area will be reclaimed as cultivated farm land and treated with fertilizers to bring it back to production. Presently the land is in a native grass condition, interspersed with a generous stand of weeds and presents somewhat of a "go back" condition. DB/eh D 3'i-A-F-8 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE 2017 W 9th Street Greeley, CO 80631 Mr. Jim Mueller July 1, 1976 Eastman Kodak Windsor, CO 80550 Subject: Seeding Recommendation-Alternative No. 2 Dear Jim, The soils in the area are capable of supporting all three seeding alternatives. Without supplimental water, alternative No. 2 will probably yield the best results since crested wheatgrass is a hardy, drought-tolerant species. Topsoiling should be done with care. If topsoil is applied to steep slopes, the possibility of slippage exists. By this, I mean that the topsoil can easily slide or erode down slope. In reference to our telephone conversation, alternative No. 2 is suited to the soils in the area. Sincerely,Y#I1 lv 6/./Wee Jeffery B. Burwell Range Conservationist, Greeleyk yl' CO BOOK 611.3Recorded at f V %lock. Am, AUG. .s�?..1959.._......................._._-.. O W ! Reception No. 153494'7 ANN $QMER_.Recorder. . • r-1 i /—/ . - Recorder'sRecozWWi-iiiiiamp THIS DEED, Made this 10th day of •• December , 196& ,between The Colorado Triangle Company I . .. O► a:corporation duly organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws , bI the State of Colorado ,of the first part,and ', Eastman Kodak Company • tVI M a corporation duly organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws ,f1 of the State of New Jersey , of the second part, tae WITNESS, That the said party of the first part, for and in consideration of the sum of ai TEN and NO/1OO DOLLARS, ri to the said party of the first part in hand paid by the said party of the second part,the receipt whereof is hereby ~ confessed and acknowledged,bath remised,released,sold,conveyed and QUIT CLAIMED,and by these presents doth O O remise, release, sell, convey and QUIT CLAIM unto the said party of the second part, its successors and assigns forever, all the right, title, interest, claim and demand which the said party of the first part bath in and to the following described tract situate, lying and being in the County of Weld and State of Colorado, to wit: II\ SE 1/4 of Section 33, Township 6 North, Range 67 West of the 6th P.M. , together with any and all water and water rights , ditches and ditch rights , flumes , canals and reservoirs appurtenant or relating thereto. - NO DOCUMENTARY FEE REQUIRED TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the same,together with all and singular the appurtenances and privileges thereunto belonging,or in anywise thereunto appertaining,and all the estate,right,title, interest and claim whatsoever, of the said party of the first part,either in law or equity,to the only proper use,benefit and behoof of the said party of the second part, its successors and assigns forever. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, The said party of the first part bath caused its corporate name to be hereunto subscribed by its President,and its corporate seal to be hereunto affixed,attested by its Secretary, the day and year first above written. Attest- . • ....A...fir?{;� .. ..... .. =i •• • 'reSKI,T 6 T "_THE....CQLORADO"..TRTANGLE._.UOMPA . s, ti°vto , , - • By ./41. President STATE OF COLORADO, l r as. _City....athi ._.County of Denver JJ //The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me'this /0 day of Q , 19 SOU, by iLQ�!/�a , Q�"r""`, as President and - /7)i C W((4a L be &O3H6K as Secretary of ... � s ,ft.The Colorado Triangle Company, a corporation. vkikalin MY CallmIulen expires Sept. 14, 1971 7V�•itneli ..a0.. nd ajn official seal. caletY•14O /e.6114t4014ess"-- * ; pU E�`�. 4 (((/// tarp Public. •'t,iff�.••••.. . 'r1 Or t No. 825. QUIT CLAIM DEED.--Corporation to Corporation.—Bradford Publishing Co.,1824-46 Stout Street,Denver,Colorado M . :1 • Q " ' BOOK 742 Recorded at o-� JUN.2.5 51975 __o'clock .---------M..__..._._.._..... Rte. Na 1663722 S. Lee Shekel), Jr., Recorder / • • • QUIT CLAIM DEED • THIS DEED, made this .!'ill day of fl r Y , 1975, t•-• Mo between ALBERT L. FRYE, as husband, and RUBY M: FRYE, as wife, • 3508 Atlantic Avenue, Long Beach, County of ,Los Angeles, State o of California, of the first part, and EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY, a to corporation organized and existing under and by virtue of the -cam o laws of the State of New Jersey; of the second part: • WITNESSETH, that the said parties of the first part, UN UN for and in consideration of the sum of TEN AND NO/100 DOLLARS ($10. 00) , and other good and valuable consideration, to the said parties of the first part in hand paid by the said party of the second4paxt, the receipt whereof is hereby confessed and acknowledged,. have remised,. released, sold, conveyed and QUIT CLAIMED, and by these presents do remise, release, sell, • convey and QUIT CLAIM unto the said party. of the second part, its• successors and assigns forever, all right, title, interest, claim and demand which the said parties of the first part have in and to the following described property situate, lying and being in the. County of Weld and State of Colorado, to wit: • A tract of land located in the Southwest Quarter (SW1/4) , Section 33, Township 6 North, Range 67 . West of the Sixth Principle Meridian, Weld County, Colorado and being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the center of said Section 33 and considering the East Line of the Southwest Quarter - (SW1/4) of said Section 33 to bear South 07°38 ' 42" • East and with all bearings herein being relative thereto: . Thence South 07°38 ' 42" East along the East Line of said . Southwest Quarter (SW1/4) , 2605. 56 feet; Thence North 14°32 '15" West, 2662.34 feet to a point on the North Line of said Southwest Quarter (SW1/4) ; . Thence North 89°03' 23" East along said North Line, 32.1. 69 feet to the Point of Beginning. Said tract contains 9.56 acres, more or less. • -TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the same together with all and singular the appurtenances and privileges thereunto belonging 4o 742 1663722 or in anywise thereunto appertaining, and all the estate, • right, title, interest and claim whatsoever, of the said parties of the first part, either in law or equity; to the only proper use, benefit and behoof of the said party of the second part, its . successors and assigns forever. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said •parties of the first • part have hereunto set their hands and seals the day and year first above written. The foregoing described property is the separate • property of Albert L. Frye -- His spouse, Ruby H. Frye, is joining in -the Quitclaim Deed for the purpose of rel a�anyr` s that she may have, if any, in such property. p AL ERT 7,. FRYE,-Pbhnd • RUB M. (—RYE li D • STATE OF CALIFORNIA • ) ss. County of Lot# e,eta- ) On this ,f,--w day of h FI y , 1975, before me, • /9 / E A-I f .f /141 /,v , a Notary Public of said State, - duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared ALBERT L. FRYE, as husband, and RUBY M. FRYE, as wife, known to me to be the persons whose names are subscribed to.. the within instrument and acknowledged that they executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year in this certificate first above written. • My commission expires . Na Y /r, /! • Gt`.f.-L,/p , �9,1 �--`. # g /7 i ,7 1 g IA A/ [SEAL] Notary Public OFFICIAL SEAL P-576.°.)"Ai ,I.:.1 ALBERT R. {'A?AN NOTARY PUBLIC • CALIFORNIA�,',, �' PRINCIPALOFFICa IN+�,E�S LOS ANGELCS COu� rY My Commission Expires Nov. 15, 1976 —2— Certificate of 31uurance L_n1 LCASUALTY COA PUANY L riINSURANCE COMPANYS 1-1 MUTUAL INSURA.CE COMPANY INSURANCE OMPANY THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AT THE REQUEST OF: • WELD COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DATE ISSUED: June 30, 1976 • GREELEY, COLORADO THE POLICIES INDICATED BELOW BY POLICY NUMBER, POLICY PERIOD AND LIMITS OF LIABILITY HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO: INSURED'S NAME AND ADDRESS EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY 343 STATE STREET ROCHESTER, NEW YORK 14650 Workmen' s Compensation - Self-Insured POLICY FORM POLICY NUMBER POLICY PERIOD COVERAGES AND LIMITS OF LIABILITY (MO-DAY-YEAR) Workmen's Compensation From 1-1-76 Workmen's Compersation—Workmen's Compensation Law of and Employers' Liability To Employers' Liability—$ Combination Automobile— From until For such Coverage Parts as are indicated below by"x"and for the General Liability ZL 655 000 To Cancelled Limits of Liability stated opposite thereto. COVERAGE PARTS BODILY INJURY LIABILITY PROPERTY DAMAGE LIABILITY each person each occurrence aggregate each occurrence aggregate IX—Comprehensive Automobile Liability Insurance $1,000,000 $ Single Limit Bodily Injury, Personal Injury O—Comprehensive General Liability Insurance $ $ and ProF$erty Damage$ $ ❑—Owners', Landlords'and Tenants' Liability Insurance ❑—Manufacturers'and Contractors'Liability Insurance $ $ $ $ ®—Completed Operations and Products Liability Insurance $ $ $ $ $ ❑—Contractual Liability Insurance $ $ $ $ —Independent Contractors Liability Insurance $ $ $ $ PERSONAL INJURY LIABILITY each person aggregate general aggregate ❑—Personal Injury Liability Insurance $ $ DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS AND LOCATION TO WHICH CERTIFICATE APPLIES All premises and operations, including owned, non-owned and hired automobiles, of Eastman Kodak Company and its' divisions and subsidiaries, including Broad Form Vendor's Coverage. SPECIAL PROVISIONS In the event this insurance is terminated or materially changed, sixty days prior written notice will be furnished to the person or organization to whom this Certificate is issued. This certificate of insurance is merely a recital of insurance afforded by the company on policy and endorsement forms in use by the company. Nothing contained herein shall operate to alter such insurance. Issued at Rochester, New York • AUT RIZED REPRESENTATIVE CK 935-1 MIMEO 8-68 50M Q(EMPEI ' PRINTED IN U S A. iliadDI:q.,43141:747 WELD COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION Tenthreet July 20, 1976 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: The Weld County Planning Commission will review a request from Eastman Kodak Company for Zone change from Industrial and Scientific to Agricultural Unit Development and Special Use Permit for an Open Cut Mine on property described as follows: Pt. Sec. 33 T6N R67W If you have any suggestions or objections, will you kindly notify us in writing before July 27, 1976 . If you wish to attend the meeting, call Greeley 353-2212 Ext. 227 and we will give you the exact time and place of the meeting. Thank you. Ken McWilliams(104) You are receiving a copy of this notification because your name appears as a surrounding property owner owning property within 500 feet of the proposed use. PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 500 FEET OF PROPOSED BORROW SITE Mr. & Mrs. L. Hicks Route 1 Box 39B Windsor, Colorado 80550 Mr. & Mrs. H. V. Crumley Route 2, Box 781 Windsor, Colorado 80550 Mr. A. L. Frye 3508 Atlantic Avenue Long Beach, California 90807 Mr. Clyde L. Davis 11 E. Orange Grove Rd. #215 Tucson, Arizona 85704 Z-276 & SUP 312 Eastman Kodak Company Mailing List 1 . Bruce D. and Vickie L. Fleming Windsor, Colorado 80550 2. H.V. and Mary Crumley Rt. 2, Box 781 Windsor, Colorado 80550 3. Albert L. Frye 3508 Atlantic Avenue p Long Beach, California 9807 4. Harry A. Yelek Rt. 1 , Box 40 Windsor, Colorado 80550 5. Ariastene Peterson Robert Lindschmidt Rt. Box 39A Windsor, Colorado 80550 6. Clyde Davis Box 1242 Greeley, Colorado 80631 7. Windsor Land Company Windsor, Colorado 80550 8. Lee and Rosemary Hicks Rt. 1 , Box 39B Windsor, Colorado 80550 9. Robert and Veda Knox R-9, 4200 East Co. Road #30 Ft. Collins, Colorado 80521 --- 1'y FRONT RANGE ENVIRONMENTAL LAB 444 Link Lane (303) 482-9605 Y Fort Collins, CO 80521 (303) 484-2328 CONSERVATION March 31, 1976 Mr. James Mueller Eastman Kodak Company Kodak Colorado Division Windsor, Colorado 80550 Dear Mr. Mueller: Soil samples were taken from the 26.15 acres of land situated in the SE/4, S33, T6N, R67W, Weld County, Colorado, and analyzed by Front Range Environmental Laboratory. As directed, these samples were com- posited to represent the upper 6-10 inches of soil and analyzed for pH, conductivity, and texture. The results obtained are: pH 7.4 Conductivity 0.2 mmhos/cm Sand 56% Silt 22% Clay 22% Texture Sandy Clay Loam There is more soil on the upslopes (approximately 20-24 inches) than at the base of the slopes (approximately 6 inches) which would be good for topsoiling in revegetation projects. If we can be of further assistance, please feel free to call on us. Sincerely yours, /C 8 I James R. Rogers JRR:skr - CO-CONS-6 U. S. Department of Agriculture 5-69 SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE (File Code CONS-14) GUIDE SHEET FOR PASTURE, HAY AND RANGE SEEDING Work Unit West Greeley Producer SEEDING PLANS: Field Nos: 1/ Species Suggested Varieties Amounts-Pounds Acre (PLS) PLANNED GRASSES AND LEGUMES ALTERNATIVE # 1 Blue Grama Lovington 0.3 Sideoats grama Vaughn 1.0 Little bluestem Pastura 1.3 Western wheatgrass Barton 0.8 TOPSOILING: 6 to 8 inches of good topsoil is highly desirable for seeding success. If the subsoil is sandstone, ripping is recommended to allow moisture and root penetration. However, the addition of more topsoil will substitue for the ripping process. PLANNED SEEDING DATES:Seed in early spring - March to April. If rainfall is sparse, supplemental water should be applied to insure seed germination. FERTILIZATION RECOMMENDATIONS: 60 to 80 lbs/ac. of available nitrogen one year after planting. SEED BED PREPARATION RECOMMENDATIONS: Have a firm seedbed; packed if possible. SEEDING EQUIPMENT PLANS: Drill with depth band and packer wheels. OTHER POINTS: (Specify LRA, irrigated, dry, or range, seed bed, depth of seeding etc.) LRA 67 Drill seeds z to 3/4 inch deep. Lbs. of bulk seed required per acre lbs. of pure live seed desired per acre divided by the purity percent X germination percent. 1/ For GPCP - Show Field No. and CIN. NOTE: If moisture is inadequate and if supplemental water is unavailable, a cover crop of sorghum or millet should be planted. Harvest the cover crop before seed shatters and leave a 6 inch stubble. Drill into the stubble the following spring. C0-CONS-6 U. S. Department of Agriculture 5-69 SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE (File Code CONS-14) GUIDE SHEET FOR PASTURE, HAY AND RANGE SEEPING Work Unit West Greeley Producer SEEDING PLANS: Field Mos: 1/ Species Suggested Varieties Amounts-Pounds/Acre (PLS) PLANNED GRASSES AND LEGUMES ALTERNATIVE #2 Crested wheatgrass Nordan 5.0 or Pubescent wheatgrass Luna 9.0 TOPSOILING: Same as Alternative #1 PLANNED SEEDING DATES: Seed in early spring - March or April. FERTILIZATION RECOMMENDATIONS: 60 to 80 lbs/ac. of available nitrogen one year after planting. SEED BED PREPARATION RECOMMENDATIONS: Have a firm seedbed; packed if possible. SEEDING EQUIPMENT PLANS: Drill with depth band and packer wheels. OTHER POINTS: (Specify LRA, irrigated, dry, or range, seed bed, depth of seeding etc.) LRA 67 Drill seeds kZ to 3/4 inch deep. Lbs. of bulk seed required per acre n lbs. of pure live seed desired per acre divided by the purity percent X germination percent. 1/ For GPCP - Show Field No. and CIN. CO-CONS-6 U. s. Department of Agriculture 5-69 SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE (File Code CONS-14) GUIDE SHEET FOR PASTURE, HAY AND RANGE SEEDING Work Unit West Greeley Producer SEEDING PLANS: Field Nos: 1/ Species Suggested Varieties Amounts-Pounds/Acre (PLS) PLANNED GRASSES AND LEGUMES ALTERNATIVE #3 Smooth Brome Manchar 8.0 Orchard grass Latar 1.0 Alfalfa Thor 1.0 TOPSOILING: Same as Alternative #1 PLANNED SEEDING DATES: Early spring - March to April FERTILIZATION REC'OMMENDATIONS: 60 to 80 lbs/ac. of available nitrogen one year after planting. SEED BED PREPARATION RECOMMENDATIONS: Have a firm seedbed, packed if possible. SEEDING EQUIPMENT PLANS: Drill with depth band and packer wheels. OTHER POINTS: (Specify LRA, irrigated, dry, or range, seed bed, depth of seeding etc.) LRA 67 Drill seeds 2 to 3/4 inch deep. Lbs. of bulk seed required per acre lbs. o pure live seed desired per acre divided by the purity percent X germination percent. 1/ For GPCP - Show Field No. and CIN. SOIL BORING LEGEND SAMPLE TYPE: B - BAG SAMPLE OF CUTTINGS C - DRIVE SAMPLE, 2" ID CALIFORNIA LINER SAMPLE S - DRIVE SAMPLE, STANDARD PENETRATION TEST, 1 1/2" ID, SPLIT SPOON SAMPLE STANDARD PENETRATION TEST 6"-6" - THE NUMBER OF BLOWS FOR THREE 6-INCH INCREMENTS REQUIRED FROM A 140-LB HAMMER FALLING 30-INCHES TO DRIVE A STANDARD 2-INCH O.D. SPLIT-BARREL SAMPLER(ASTM D-1586).NOTE THAT DRIVES WERE MADE FOR TWO 6-INCH INTERVALS IN SOME CASES DUE TO EQUIPMENT LIMITATIONS. (N) - THE SUM OF BLOWS FOR THE SECOND AND THIRD 6-INCH INCREMENTS. SYMBOLIC LOG MB SAND 11111 • SILT VA CLAY • ', GRAVELS SHALE I NOTES: 1. THE BORING AND/OR TEST PIT LOGS AND RELATED INFORMATION DEPICT SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS ONLY AT THE SPECIFIC LOCATIONS AND DATES INDICATED. SOIL CONDITIONS AND WATER LEVELS AT OTHER LOCATIONS MAY DIFFER FROM CONDITIONS OCCURRING AT THESE BORING AND/OR TEST PIT LOCATIONS. ALSO, THE PASSAGE OF TIME MAY RESULT IN A CHANGE IN THE CONDITIONS AT THESE LOCATIONS. 2. BORINGS AND/OR TEST PITS WERE LOGGED IN THE FIELD BY A CH2M HILL GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER. SAMPLES WERE EXAMINED AND VISUALLY CLASSI- FIED IN APPROXIMATE ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM D2488. gilDi)NOn CdAR 9 9989 NEM „t,„ Cu, tiihioN, 0mA-snit, =En Gf,I HILL a PROJECT NUMBER BU uNG NUMBER af..NHILL A/24337/ e/' /0 /<CD-/3 -A-1 SHEET / OF I 1 SOIL BORING LOG PROJECT A'azoK 057;r Y' Tptq•72/Iiu7"ielwr LOCATION le1/1/U0SOA/ CoLO,as4-DO ELEVATION 4736. 3 F,EgT(A449eDX-) DRILLING CONTRACTOR ).e/LG/.t/l5 iNJj/itJ,c4seS DRILLING METHOD AND EQUIPMENT • Ofri .5—+s W/7w 4 l4 /NCH 1.P, 1-44,-4W S74n, A?w4b2/ '//J/YIA7M H.4fol,f, WATER LEVEL AND DATE ea-V. 473Z•8/ 6/74/88 START 6/L8/ FINISH 6�LB/5$ LOGGER ae°w^1 SAMPLE STANDARD SOIL DESCRIPTION COMMENTS PENETRATION i W"' Q RESULTS SOIL NAME.COLOR.MOISTURE CONTENT, J DEPTH OF CASING, RELATIVE DENSITY OR CONSISTENCY,SOIL DRILLING RATE. mV > ¢W > 0 6"-6"-6" STRUCTURE.MINERALOGY,USCS GROUP m DRILLING FLUID LOSS. i y¢ I w F (N) SYMBOL 2 O TESTS AND Z ,t2 Q t H INSTRUMENTATION 0.0 //' sc F, Xavivy / - / sA/Voy J ,eeawN 6447; d�z j - '4i� /1:45741-•8-/ 9•o , (4 . . Y Z- soif. (cc) Ihes.4 RdcA.v7L y /zel4.4-7Ro j0 • /', 4-- - ' 5' S v — Q of a 4EGaM'I#. seutoy® - C-/ 0.7' /-Z _ .r/Lay SANP t17F1 Q,e,0v4LS,Lr. , of I ., g.s-fe.Fr G c.o o , - b yaz y hoos:I-wi . • - 7 7o C-2- 0.7 3—// - d °I:. ° • / -Z•vc.e6/1-S/N .Div$/ w/rg da/27,j „rot S.• o 4 4.0 d-4 /D 9-/G r/4s/>/1fl1 s,E, I A" C-5" 0.7' 6,5w/re_ t.li "3.41-0c0_,? /5,cowe,/, /i �00..a` D'sra,eeyN"�.':i* 7o codCims, • /0 M k o/!!+M d9X IO £, co/3/f(/SS " I 1 006.40 N-Vfrs4(g, am/77,44o AOa • • II )O n• /L - - a a D r OO .. /3 — — 64'A rs) 620% sc> Ale/57; VAey phiv.f4, =--- - ,ae/caa,E M77•£s "444O /P /Ma , 02/;;&.4 _. C..e/[link A•y /3.G, /s /So S-/ /0 /S-3S --- .a.N.6' iso' - - £NO ® /a;sO,c,•r - S�Ar/D/JP•4. P/.Ezo.r s 0Z,e - - It "PVC /3477001 5:6-'.sca7ritO 7Z4-. 1fN67w /s CI BAtX'F/sl —car?ri,vir REV 7/86 FORM D158 4 NI4 - PROJECT NUMBER d BORING NUMBER ® 24 S 7. g/-/o /z(CnKJ -.6-4 Z SHEET / OF SOIL BORING LOG IPROJECT l e)A* tienW477M �/ ,07/*a'I!*/i/r ,4fr 7' LOCATION tJ//4:0SO/Z/ L�LG,e'�dQ ELEVATION 4-737.9 F*,7 (APPRoX•) DRILLING CONTRACTOR O,ei/-1-/n/6 /Fl/C/Nf,ERS I DRILLING METHOD AND EQUIPMENT C'/h4-- Sc G.r/1N #7 hues/ X A. liaaot.J $TIfcM AN6 /Maggio /e mt/o/,+h,i. WATER LEVEL AND DATE /€ 4V. 4732.Z//,!8/BS START 6/Z8/ge FINISH_ 6/7-B/SS LOGGER 8,e0w^/ SAMPLE STANDARD SOIL DESCRIPTION COMMENTS o a PENETRATION o Y TEST RESULTS SOIL NAME,COLOR,MOISTURE CONTENT. � DEPTH OF CASING. w ma a z¢ w RELATIVE DENSITY OR CONSISTENCY,SOIL -1 DRILLING RATE. I w W m ,O 6"-6"�" STRUCTURE,MINERALOGY,USCS GROUP 0 DRILLING FLUID LOSS. cc (NI SYMBOL - a O TESTS AND Ci -z ¢ n . INSTRUMENTATION O'D1 I Os�/�i SKNNy /:Ty,s hvo, o,eaw', MoisT, /- - .. - . s7AA:T( /O.3OA i - ' 2- 6-/ #.0 NM V•f' ' 1.‘0v54, - I -I:: _ •I i . 3 �•I:. I4 4-,oC/ s /—/ S�M/q/ LT. d2own/, Y-Mo/5T z2;. w�7 .S 0. ✓eea/ 4.90s&. — . - — • Ma/ST G f77'A 'Wand A-14..4'5 C6Az/.f�/ Maio, DA-, �s,u+; d. I`1� F- Twtti -X- - I 9 fin✓G, LT. (3¢owA/ 140.7", L�»S'$ -?:„:",:i D,e/u.X.2 Na7.s- S.4+v ' _ / C-2- 1,0 2-6 - e.-07-1-:vVis /O i✓ lJ/iT ---:0... .w4 4f>"S/v 6.61/'✓.fi LS /N JAwD W/TH �e/4Y,�LJ 8PO�+ / '�'.o o 1 //- - '0.: Gcr77/:v4s - 6 /2 °-•-0 - 0 €At//1L t.r1T'/ ‘514,v2;,) 6/LO&. #1 w i .7b�a, a2/Lc.. a .1/d7GS Narto22 II /3- _.0,,. '//5�C. Geist/:,,4t, -b,e#tasc. - b- 'V, _)• 9•G _ is- .5=-/ /O/ 6-Z/ ssr , 6.e.61/, v. As vsE,sc7./r ois7. -—•- _ _ _ 0.a•N. 0 /s-..s.' - .E.v.a ' ////s-A-0,4 I - - - - - S7A»/oPiP4. .ah(7.40,0,374..Q _ - - /y"evc - I - - 6,77•••76 /54.077/40 - T7n. /ANCi7N /3'a &3s-tkbil. -CI'77iNF/s - - - - - REV 7/86 FORM D1586 ri • MINN ,,$/✓ 7•/'4/PROJECT]] NUMBER BORING i NUMBER MIM GIMHILL �i 24 33 /d /�L -'9-f 3 SHEET / OF / MIMI ki SOIL BORING LOG PROJECT k iDAIY 441-3-7A-11.44-774? mA✓7/1•4Air LOCATION 4/./A%D.Seel, 6402.49a ELEVATION 4'734'..c,-4, T (R/°PRDX) DRILLING CONTRACTOR ,-&2//' ,A'4 eA/$/71.010EES DRILLING METHOD AND EQUIPMENT_ ('m/t 5.5.- 4.777'1 4 44 /Nly Z..0. hbe-tews72GM AvieSfdre5 A'//rGregri H,#/pr, WATER LEVEL AND DATE `cif/ ¢7340/ ti/LB/88 START ef/Li#8 FINISH /86 LOGGER 82ownl SAMPLE STANDARD SOIL DESCRIPTION COMMENTS PENETRATION TEST } RESULTS SOIL NAME,COLOR,MOISTURE CONTENT, V DEPTH OF CASING. 11 m 0 > •i w w RELATIVE DENSITY OR CONSISTENCY,SOIL r.. O DRILLING RATE, > 6"-6"-6" STRUCTURE,MINERALOGY,USCS GROUP m DRILLING FLUID LOSS, a It F Wa U^ (N) SYMBOL 2 0 TESTS AND }_ w rn INSTRUMENTATION 2,,F. z H2 U. D.o o /- S'Ar/DI// CLA•/, ,e.a u.h/, irtd/ST 90 6/e , v./MN Y II / STAR? & /z: fUp... Z- .8-/ 4,0 /VA ://://:3- lII sm 4 ¢° S 474 ry sA+�d,v aeown/, wgT z_oost _ .i.1:,-1.:'• 6 _1'..1';'):'• -Ls 6 ° 70 C-/ 1,0/ 2-6 S/1-7N1eats', (alzey V.O10/57, SOFT i/1/1/ 7 " : Y• 8 AA C-z /,0' 7// jib✓D w/>H4.PAvisl5 7.0 4r,B.eown/, toS j - Q O MAD/um e4.v(L• ,0 . . 9 a: t Him /0 `,o,o —G..t?‘ 4F,0/Ylr d/AJ sfoopzl.`K',%F // n.o C_3 Q' -D Yi • a //• D/3Tae$4Eo SA/nrtF, _it G /V-V ue.E am/77'S /3 .,•0•. /i $/!!i'G/E, 4.ea//,...C.47:Arlo/ST To me/� _=—:=. 2::,..E/44/5.e nMT.ES HARD d.P�canv.5_ /7 i}o wr /3,6 FEET- 8 eoc - - 6 p#5-,.., _101 - - ii. - - 1_ _ _II , _ _ ] _ _ _ii ss,70,,,D,;,. . „„,,42,,,m_mie -i _ _ /Z "PV G —� ,Bo7Tom 6.0�SCO77ED 7727:41., uf.VbTy /S.S - _ &Weli t-Carr/moo _II _ _ Iii REV 7/86 FORM D1586 I TEST PIT LOGS KODA}:. LAGOONS BORROW AREA 0 NOTES: _ 1 . The test pit logs and related information represent subsurface r conditions only at the specific locations and dates indicated . Soil conditions and water levels at other locations may vary from conditions occurring at these test pit locations. Also, ill the passage of time may result in a change in the conditions at these locations. N C. Test pits were logged in the field by a CH2M HILL engineering geologist. Samples were examined and visually classified in the field in approximate accordance with ASTM 2488. IITest pit logs were made for one side of the test pit only and may not be representative of the configuration and depth of materials on the other side of the pit. Ill4. Samples were taken from materials excavated from the test pits and depth of samples and material changes are approximate. I5. - Locations of test pits were determined in the field by pacing from surface features such as roads. These locations are Ishown on the borrow plan are approximate only. 6. Notes presented in the remarks column are the subjective interpretation of the engineering geologist logging the test II pit. II PROJECT NUMBER TEST PIT N ER MEM -t303 SHEET I OF _HILL d Zlp „$[. AO Lam" a MEIN TEST PIT LOG T dDA K VS ,13007:0•4) ,Nv T LOCATION l�� 3 LOGGER�6I"� .I PROJEC CONTRACTOR 'Kt.11)74 K / p ELEVATION DATE EXCAVATEDED �/z/AP ) EXCAVATION EOUIPMENTTU/� ^ 3 Maximum Depth S Z III WATER LEVEL AND DATE N A APPROX.DIMENSIONS: Length�- Width COMMENTS SAMPLE SOIL DESCRIPTION cJ DIFFICULTY IN EXCAVATION, Fa lilt J RUNNING GRAVEL CONDITION, W Q Z CC SOIL NAME,COLOR,MOISTURE CONTENT, m COLLAPSE OF WALLS,SAND HEAVE, mu > Q m RELATIVE DENSITY OR CONSISTENCY,SOIL O DEBRIS ENCOUNTERED,WATER H M W a° STRUCTURE.MINERALOGY,USCS GROUP SEEPAGE GRADATIONAL CONTACTS, ma z -Z SYMBOL y- TESTS INSTRUMENTATION ≥LtAz17 gE� ��L` l l if C,�A'-(�� Lo-n) �A 5'r p -r ��) DQ �/ �lt%fILc3Li— L-KeAvr4t7c'r.1 V t-1 5fl i—1 rE) A4 2 D) 56-1)13.t- u_ c_t_ L.D L_-_--T, • — Z _ . uC ti-TV') CALr / Po RCS _ - c5rn ut--ur26- Ill 5 - . II 5 _ - Fr- COYY) ,,t rE. But_/'� U or- p�T ��2 _ ff)P7)i° -E FieL'rr1 ~rly='I _ II U i - - IP _ _ _ I _ _ , I REV 7/86 FORM D1598 t = , ,w di III '_- PROJECT NUMBER TEST PIT NUMBER MEN -)i%N 26,3 ',7. 51. 20 IV_D-TPZ- 505 SHEET l OF r TEST PIT LOG PROJECT-kDrAKIAG00,Y5 c'Y:itp� VYV r. LOCATION R-'IS'o 5_ LOGGER 5 2 ELEVATION �" / CONTRACTOR 1�6 4K EXCAVATION EQUIPMENT zy-f.4I3 6 Roo /-�NC�/l n,c- DATE EXCAVATED I7 /Z/Sf.S / WATER LEVEL AND DATE N IA APPROX.DIMENSIONS: Length _Width Maximum Depth C'S 3 SAMPLE SOIL DESCRIPTION COMMENTS E J V DIFFICULTY IN EXCAVATION, I III W > Z CC SOIL NAME,COLOR,MOISTURE CONTENT, RUNNING GRAVEL CONDITION, ▪V Q m RELATIVE DENSITY OR CONSISTENCY,SOIL 0 COLLAPSE OF WALLS,SAND HEAVE, d¢ CC w a 2 STRUCTURE.MINERALOGY,USCS GROUP e O DEBRIS ENCOUNTERED,WATER Y SYMBOL y O SEEPAGE GRADATIONAL CONTACTS, I OIlim - H Z H TESTS, INSTRUMENTATION CL�) V `'I .5. I�n'I C '� i&tint LOMA_ Loc�C�6 7 - bINI °'�LLr') L6r� rte' A5nurY)1 5r col-- vPax.o>� - DI≥C - nr-F rz ftAIZ-1 ')f -t- ,42i7 �'?SCA ►/An�r( 5bYV E CALCyQ2E"Du'S ►'►r1Af'L} 114/Z-17, p2i t.-.5I _ 2 - ?DI�ou5 Mix- -02 ' (L' L— - mt..) 3 - - r 2 t�- Imo - Sv e2s-� I '1 - _ • - I 5 - . {?I c-2 Ft A. - 5H - , Cz,Qt4& 1 , Sr Ltd 1 �v flrs'1 toe -LsrL "77, - G'+2t 'r18�r , Frs5 r c..�----r-1rt6-u7- I a�-� c.cc.—mc_) - W/ DC: . 'C'%e_ 6)(CA viA nc.--1 EOrer l or ?rt .-Ar- e/ C./5),Y) POSri l X-K m PC. ' TA> _ I KO- r70 _ g ' I I - - I I I REV 7/86 FORM D1598 `- PROJECT NUMBER TEST PIT BER y WK ZCP3�f.B1.2o 7<CD-11 5- --J SHEET' OF OMR 1 TEST PIT LOG ] PROJECT 7YJ�Kl LA � i 55 - /� fl � LOCATION i, '5 LOGGER ELEVATION �/, y�� /� CONTRACTOR,y�r � 4K 12 /�� EXCAVATION EQUIPMENT 2Y t A/A '+�c� / `a e7rx�or DATE EXCAVATED /�� i .._2:-WATER LEVEL AND DATE /Y/A APPROX.DIMENSIONS: Length �2 Width Maximum Depth a 1 ll SAMPLE SOIL DESCRIPTION COMMENTS 3 DIFFICULTY IN EXCAVATION, J m Q Z tr SOIL NAME,COLOR,MOISTURE CONTENT, CJ J RUNNING GRAVEL CONDITION, m tt 2 Q m RELATIVE DENSITY OR CONSISTENCY,SOIL 0 COLLAPSE OF WALLS,SAND HEAVE, ll -a.s FW- wa 2 STRUCTURE.MINERALOGY.USCS GROUP O DEBRIS ENCOUNTERED,WATER >7 SYMBOLSEEPAGE GRADATIONAL CONTACTS, 0 m - i-Z >0 J TESTS,INSTRUMENTATION nl btu-r l.e. e qT E?2t'7a 514 ALE— NOF 4O4u- 4,O a i, Ct.Ak , Y. Stoni fD 5et.4--, C.L.*1 7`z ,'Csr- wr vP.5wPC - - no �,�jrQrY�C�iyo Lj � D2Gt , R t5D f�, PE55rcqre..--r,5TrevU?- illi — Z - ee -AISS /rim 4.)45C5, 5L),176. - (7.C-srp;4L- `S6t ,-- - C,4LLC X4iZ rD reZ1r &, - '3 - CCc.-4,10 - / _ /+ - r i — -- Ill ,j _ �C., L) c ) A . 13r- 51150) CtAuC'J-- Tb V, 5 (L17.? 3eN -C2 RA`-), 1:2(0) - - ll 7:),(1 -p,p, r=r- r c-C, ei,2✓n- - 7 - - S - p 5010 r n ar pr- i-r'-- 8 ' Ca ipac L - -at.)e-K 5,a-rrr/pt- - 0 - 6 ' _ _ _ _ 1 III _ _ _ Il _ _ _ _ _ _I _ _ _ REV 7/88 FORM D1598 III •- PROJECT NUMBER TEST PIT NUMBER MIN MINI L1Ev 2(o337 .$i•AD f'CIX'_' T`T 1305 SHEET OF TEST PIT LOG IPROJECT-KOBAK L AS1t•+lS i 2:NV LOCATION ecx) 5 LOGGER-& ELEVATION CONTRACTOR i<t)DAK EXCAVATION EQUIPMENT 2Y-1"1 Ail-0-6- 1 400 f3r1C<freC DATE EXCAVATED 12/'r 55 __ , WATER LEVEL AND DATE 41/2. /213/86 APPROX.DIMENSIONS: Length2 Width4 Maximum Depth S�� SAMPLE SOIL DESCRIPTION COMMENTS g O V DIFFICULTY IN EXCAVATION, mW < Z W SOIL NAME,COLOR.MOISTURE CONTENT. RUNNING GRAVEL CONDITION, V Q RELATIVE DENSITY OR CONSISTENCY,SOIL O COLLAPSE OF WALLS,SAND HEAVE, CO tZ 4C w a2 STRUCTURE.MINERALOGY,USCS GROUP 20 DEBRIS ENCOUNTERED,WATER Z >Z SYMBOL >.O SEEPAGE GRADATIONAL CONTACTS, ow _ /^CTESTTS,,IINN.STTRUMEEN'TATION / - to- t) ?L/i5,fc. fra.5r- r c� - IFF Y/ ��A6 -7 �Y r f ,`'r`1- 1C� EE"/ sir ra Z - m ei, 6r7,=P" C n"i_- t,-(2) _ - I 3 - - Ill li , ,5f-f-.411..C• 6,,n L-GL) _le 6:. _ ForrOrn ot-= Pf 7---tS 1—5% ' SA roc)pu r_-_(-2_0 l III _ _ Oro 5-Yz_ rr---r- - NI _ _ _ Ili _ ... _ Ill _ _ _ _ _ _ III _ _ _ III _ _ _ II _ _ - II REV 7/86 FORM D1598 '- PROJECT NUMBER TEST PIT BER a,� a ptMHILL . �� .L �J 7�• 1.L'D IIIL-Tx.,T�S-EO') SHEET 1 OF MEM TEST PIT LOG II PROJECT Ko K (11,(77945 2.4 '"' =.4V 'LOCATION ‘F 4L•2-2-6'10-'+c-2-6 ') LOGGER 5 ELEVATION CONTRACTOR K I Q EXCAVATION EQUIPMENT,/ 7�1 I47 rin I(A C�I�S O B'A4C DATE EXCAVATED 17-/)-1 P-3 WATER LEVEL AND DATE hL i 4 APPROX.DIMENSIONS: Length _.Width 1 1 Maximum Depth�_ili SAMPLE SOIL DESCRIPTION COMMENTS OE J DIFFICULTY IN EXCAVATION, m w < a W SOIL NAME,COLOR,MOISTURE CONTENT. : RUNNING GRAVEL CONDITION, III _< Q RELATIVE DENSITY OR CONSISTENCY,SOIL O COLLAPSE OF WALLS,SAND HEAVE, I-s w a g STRUCTURE,MINERALOGY.USCS GROUP O DEBRIS ENCOUNTERED,WATER y O SEEPAGE GRADATIONAL CONTACTS, O w - I-Z SYMBOL w-o TESTS,INSTRUMENTATION acALA v,5t L ,R2r� D2�, 5niF - E%1LA j ffr5 IL/3)0170'6Cl 074541 L2 V/3 0lG d1_C - 61 Lr") SA r� / Nbn( PLA5f� Z - Lr, B2."6) LAmP .-moi5r4T"-- _ - - ,* 571 hn PLC" II , T74 L_�1L P P vYt /-'5 i12, - 7 1 - - . _ -I c '8D en OF 'Pt r" Ai- �lZ ' - -1- _I _ - 11 -, - -oi IJ 11 0 _10 REV 7/86 FORM 01598 Ill.• /4-4-4=e is' }r.•.n-ra , .xa?tolik7M„ 'a ,...-......:;":4.,.• - MOM MEW PROJECT NUMBER TEST PIT NUMBER p� DET'LZ(, ).Fi.� h7"C—'nPCO—t�L>'� SHEET v OF TEST PIT LOG PROJECT'1 DAtc Ciro ISM' ??.—e-5' ) . IQC 1 LOCATION 1 3 LOGGER ELEVATION CONTRACTOR KoLY1K EXCAVATION EQUIPMENT 3��N7Aring- ((o0 ?& Pre . DATE EXCAVATED 1G` ./2') / / Q � WATER LEVEL AND DATE N IA APPROX.DIMENSIONS: Length Width (e Maximum Depth 3 SAMPLE SOIL DESCRIPTION COMMENTS J v DIFFICULTY IN EXCAVATION, la W Q 21 SOIL NAME,COLOR,MOISTURE CONTENT, : RUNNING GRAVEL CONDITION, V Q W RELATIVE DENSITY OR CONSISTENCY,SOIL O COLLAPSE OF WALLS,SAND HEAVE, _ w nw STRUCTURE,MINERALOGY,USCS GROUP r O DEBRIS ENCOUNTERED,WATER m 0 Z H Z SYMBOL H O SEEPAGE GRADATIONAL CONTACTS, - TESTS,INSTRUMENTATION ±rt tri'Ll eAciiC .e73) ►kA.TO I I e'x(C..A'/A i``. Em / CC.,-ALI 1 N' . 1 L.- i Fi1? S- zi Q..) '__.\ rf l - C.efJ pC As'n(L1% / YYI*Pj- M ED, 4- 14 Cl-D,NI► C_29 i1 Lv} (-9 _ Z - Z/4- �a LI L0.-L-►rn AA O - `1 - ill 3 - - I 1 1 _ E_ F-12.vv A 0,15o'c�� B u1- _ Iv1rrflE D± F zGCir i-z--- - 1 ! 51A S r¢. YW 2- CA(1.116.5i`le) - A 2i7J E'5;.At ,S bit Intr51 - Ir C CL -►1L) i - I 8 - _ _ 1 WO q i _ _ : - g REV 7/86 FORM D1598 7i7,7, PT FOR CERTIFIED ITAIIIL-3 J (pflus p3v,:, y • SENDER Complete items I, 2,and I SENT TO POSTMAF c Add your address in the "RETURN TO" space on Harry A. Yelek ORDATI a reverse STREET AND NO. m 1. The following service is requested (check one) �' Rt 1, Box 40 LT a Show to whom and date delivered 15¢ P 0 STATE AND ZIP CODE ❑ Show to whom, date,& address of delivery.. 35¢ CY) _ Windsor, CO 80550 ❑ RESTRICTED DELIVERY. OPTIONAL SERVICES FOR ADDITIONAL FOES___ Show to whom and date delivered 65¢ 00 1. Shoos to whorl c-id date delivered 15 RETURN C RECEIPT With delivery to adcrc5sae only 65y+ Li RESTRICTED DELIVERY. CV r:), 2. Stows to when,dote eel uhsro delivered 350 Show to whom, date, and address of delive 85 SERVICES With delivery to adcrescca only .,. 850_ 5-Y ¢ . DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY 500 c4, SPECIAL DELIVERY (otttra fco roquircd) - 2 ARTICLE ADDRESSED TO: Z °S °^'-, HO INSURANCE CODE[Al�E PROVIDED— (Soo otF.cr 22 i9:1 �L1D Albert L. Frye NOT FOR INTERIAT]CNAL ram o CPO.1072 O-4 g 3508 Atlantic Ave z m Long Beach, CA 90807 _ f f�5� FOR �,a2 2 2 MAUL-30('p (Oils 3. ARTICLE DESCRIPTION: P -fL iIPII FOR CLSRT�IE�LSD MA016®3D(; (Oils post REGISTERED NO. CERTIFIED NO. INSURED NO. SENT TO POSTN1AI x 283915 OR DAT m Albert L. Frye cl N ( obtain signature of jddressee or agent) STREET AND NO m I have eceive the article described above. 3508 Atlantic Ave m SI ATURE. ddrefsee ❑ Authorized agent P.O., STATE AND ZIP CODE \ f- 01 LongoP eachr5CA_Fo nD9_013_07�s c -a( 00 RETURN 1. Shoos 40 ohon Cid dale delivered ... 15¢ m F ELlYERY� POSTMARK With delivery to adarc,ce only 65¢ O r,2- 2 0 RECEIPT 2. Sh;rn tot• ..n,Cote cri c,hcre delivered 350 > (// _ SERJICEES With delivery to addrescec only 850 0 5. ADDRESS Comp tote only if requested) 6 DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY _ 50c 4,1- Q SPECIAL DELIVERY (oxtra fco roquircd) I m I.'CO TZ ,� !`971 3000 NO INSURANCE COURAGE PROVIDED— (Soo othe xi _. NOT FOR INTEENATIONAL .1AIL n GPO 1072 O- m 6 UNABLE TO DELIVER BECAUSE: CLERK'S 0 - INITIALS C iri RECEIPT FOR CER II llIT ED IIVIIAlL-3®(s (phis pad 76=28 *GPO 1975-O-568-047 SENT TO FOs'I.„ Eastman Kodak Co OR Dal- STREET AND NO. _ ....A., vib P 0, STATE AND ZIP CODE w • SENDER Complete items I,',and i 01 T Add your address in the "RETURN TO" space on 3 reverse — Windsor,_ CO 8_0550(Y) _ OPTIONAL SERVICES FOR ADDITIONAL FEELS _ 1 The following service is requested (check one{) •e ° 00 RETURN 1. S^aos to when end date delivered . 150 g ; 1 With delivery to addressee only 650 Show to whom and date delivered 15 04 RECEIPT 2. Eh07s to rrh c'i,Colo c-d nhcre delivered 350 ¢ SERVICES With delivery to ceiressec only .. 85y' ❑ Show to whom,,date,& address of delivery.. 35¢ DELIVEl TO ADDRESSEE ONLY --_ 50@ ❑ RESTRICTED DELIVERY. Q , SPECIAL DELIVERY (oa••o fcc roquircd) - o Z PS Form 3900 Show_to whom and date delivered.....___... 65¢ C30 INSURANCECO �RGGE PROVIDED— (Sao ot,. '^r. 1971 NOT FOIL INTErNATIONAL riA1,L ,,GPO.1972 O- Li RESTRICTED DELIVERY. Show to whom, date, and address of delivery 85¢ 2 ARTICLE ADDRESSED TO: zi R 1 PT FOR CERTIFIED Ca0L®30(' (pkgS has c Hairy A. Yelek SENT TO POSTP,IF z DA' z Rt 1, Box 40 H.V. OR m Windsor, CO 80550 STREET AND NO m 3 ARTICLE DESCRIPTION: • (.D Rt 2, Box 781 REGISTERED NO. CERTIFIED NO. INSURED NO. S-41 P 0, STATE AND ZIP CODE Pa `7m283914 _ Windsor, CO 84550 5-n OPTIONAL SERVICES FOR RDDIfIO'AL FEES 1 (Always obtain signature of addressee or agent) 00 "TURN— 1. Shads to v horne cnd Sato delivered . .. 15Q n, I have received the article described above. xi With delivery to a dreseoe only 65d m SIGNATUR OJ RECEIPT 2. Shoos to ntc oi,date a.d r.horo delivered 350 O E ❑ Addressee i Authorized agent SERVICES With delivery to addressor only,.. , , 850 I n s DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY 50d i 6�.A/ Q I SPECIAL DELIVERY Contra fco roquircd) • I C 4 c7-,,; 6.—.)--N,,' �` Dt1TE OF DELIVERY r RK Z Son No INSURANCE CUVERAGE PROVIDED— (Soo ar,. "t (---Arc, 19'1 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL GPO.1072 O- > �, > • Qv� 0 5 A DRESS (Complete onl it requestq) `9.05 rt m .‘‘S R EC PT FOR CERTIFIED MD L-38(' ( h s post, m 6 UNABLE TO DELIVER BECAUSE cribat -I' SEPJ TO POSTMAF D \\ �`__,uy �) truce D. & Vickie L. Flemin ORDATI > • STREET AND NO *GP0 1975—O-568-047 76-28 T°i P0. STATE AND ZIP CODE Or) Windsor, CO 80550 0) OPTIONAL SERVICES FOR ADDITIONAL FEES oc RETD,iI] 1. Shoos to o rra cid date delivered ... 150 With delivery to edcrc;Lee only . 650 04 RECEIPT 2. Shan;40 v:he1,date c-1 o,-ere delivcrcd 350 SERVICES With delivery to adc rcseoe only .. 85¢_ DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY _ 500 Q t SPECIAL DELIVERY Contra fco roquircd) Z `:171 `0C NO INSURANCE CDV=RA:A PB OVIDED— (Sco e.tkor cado) - NOT FOR INTEL?'ATlOUWAL MAIL 0 GPO 1072 O-'C0-7ee N • SE\D1 R (,mplete Item; i 2,and , ,c Add your address in the "RETURN TO" space on a, 9 reverse '= 1 ', 1 The following service is requested (check one) /1.(I) n Show to whom and date delivered 150 ❑ Show to whom, date, & address of delivery.. 350 / v LJ a" L'---- \ RES 1 RIC I ED DELIVERY t' 7115-- c � t.O )j Show to whom and date delivered 650 / LI RESTRICTED DELIVERY O j /F Show to whom, date, and address of deliver).'850 to U s -- '.i N e ? c CD 2 ARTICLE ADDRESSED TO: El IIIq Windsor Land Co U Q z Windsor, CO 80550 53 I ` r-i� m ® m 3 ARTICLE DESCRIPTION: REGISTERED NO CERTIFIED NO. INSURED NO m 283911 • Ln G7 (Always obtain signature of addressee or agent) Nc1 c mn I have received the article described above Ou) `O 0 c N • sFNDFR (omplete item: I 2,and , Add your address in the "RETURN TO" space on TSrev erne t u w 1 The following service is requested (check one). a Show to whom and date rl;1ivered 150 "i-I \ ❑ Show to whom, date, & address of delivery.. 350 ,, tOA` Uhl "-I RES'I RIC'I ED DELIVERY 'Ci rC1 r Shov, to whom and date delivi ied 650 eI —I RESTRICTED DELIVERY •• Show to whom, date, and address of deliver) 850 —J L..) t-..., 2 ARTICLE ADDRESSED TO: �, xi IP � 'a q H.V. & Mary Crumley J�o a� /° ', m Rt 2, Box 781 z �, 1% IQ ��ya rJ ' m 11 p Windsor, CO 80550 ��(( j - _ __ m co c J`co / ..fl i m 3 ARTICLE DESCRIPTION: y�i 64 4. �,`' c`� ¢c REGISTERED NO CERTIFIED NO. INSURED NO. �- Qaa` S'sy xi 283916 t m . RI ..,.3 4`yc y e4 �n y (Always obtain signature of addressee or agent) y Jc D�j,cc, J I I have received the article described above. w v4.,o r jr 3 m SIGNATURE LI Addressee ❑ Authorized agent Z *2944 T=4 is _ O ' s. t__ vii 1... S:t., Cc-j• • ID0 in a Q) 1 O-) m E F DELIVERY r`'F'fjS RK CO0 ' �' ' f 0 m 0 CO C ' 70 ��rrr _ C. Z"� 0 8 m a r` p 5 ADDRESS (Complete only if requested) .1O m `c . t O a - \ O O U m 6 UNABLE TO DELIVER BECAUSE: 'IN S W ; . V o �— — > Lt. W W , r O ; , GPO 1575-O 568-047 Q 76-28 Ire e O CO I. CC RTMEDD MIL----M, (pkils postbag) POSTMARK Ariastene Peterson OR DATE sT10p,j,`,9(,9Rebert -tjndSC nhidt - CI Rt 1, Box 39A b--)1 P 0., STATE AND ZIP CODE GEC CCEPT FOR CERTIFIED IFIED C',']QK- C) Windsor, CO 80550 SENT TO c `ii - - _ QRTIr•17L EMCEE FCl ODOITICtIAL FEES Clyde Davis OO RETURN 1. S,or,,40 t h:'-1 cad drto C'C'+ncrcd 15¢ wits J livt y to aver only 650 ' _ -- RECEIPT 2. S„-to c"a" L'-3c C-3,,,-Cre dc114trcd 351 STREET AND NO SERVICES With dalsicry to etdrnscco only_ C5ct Box 1242 o DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY --- 50d ',,-1 - -- P.O, STATE AND ZIP CODE SPECIAL DELIVERY (oatra fco roga'rcd) I P5 (ram ,f [JO UfJS�2A(J�E L'C'c Greeley CO 80631 �,T,1 RACE Pf1DVIDED— (Soo othor sido) Cill e _ OPTIONAL SERVICES F00 RDDITIONaL AFr, 1971 �JDV FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL o GPO•1972 O-460-743 OO UETURfn 1. Shares to t7 i0-1 std data delivt'c'1 a With deliecry to cddre-cco only ca;. RECEIPT 2. Sr:,-,s toe"-r,date t..—:1_ c ncro C-Gt:C' ;L` SERVICES W'th dahvcry to r A'rreseP only_ _ ( DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY t•,: ® SPECIAL DELIVERY (otitra fco roc,aircd) l] ;'7� ')g Thin eco NO UhSUDRANC C;.._ 3.. r...,3L3,3--- (Soo cti,or Lido) " Apr. 1971 ` NOT FOR L'. .a1'i01„lR MAIL '5 GPO 1072 O-4C0-743 II ö ``( ,EGPT FOR CC[ RTMED C41111L—SJc (On p©S2 N SENT TO SENDER Complete items and ) Lee & Rosemary Hicks POSTMARK O' Add your address in the "RETURN TO" space on _ OR DATE 3 everse ® STREET AND NO. w 1 The following service is requested (check one). '� _-_- Rt 1, Box 39B Show to whom and date delivered P.O , STATE AND ZIP CODE to 15Q a) 5h w to whom, date, & address of delivery. 35Q OO —Windsor,_ CO- - 80550 ° RES"l'RIC-J ED DELI}ER}' _ __ _OPTIONAL SERVICES FOR ADDITIONAL FLIESCO _ RCT1C1tJ 1. Shoos to VJton end date delivered 15y Show to whom and date delivered CIEC;IPT With delivery to addre,sce only . 650 65Q 2. Stowe to ahem,Coto cad v,Ncre delivered . 350 ❑ RES'�RIOTED DELIVER}'SCRtrICCS With delivery to addressee only 850Show to whom, date, and address of delivers 850 DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY -- - - ® SPECIAL DELI VERY - --- 50d(attire fco roquircd) --I P5 C cn,e `FAD NO INSURANCE COVERAGE P;a®VIDED— 2 ARTICLE ADDRESSED TO: :r. 1)71 CJ®� FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL (Soo or�,or c:; Eastman Kodak Co. ,CPO.iar o-dca_ z Windsor, CO 80550 M S1 o /� p p E7L ;EGPT FOR CCCG3TGG=GED CMlL=3D(s (PG(LOS POdSS!,j m 3 ARTICLE DESCRIPTION REGISTERED NO CERTIFIED NO INSURED NO SENT TO POSTMARK Robert & Veda Knox OR DATE m 283918 ' STREET AND NO. 1 (Always obtain signature of addressee or agent) CI R-9, 4200 East Co. Rd. #30 m I have received the article described above. ® mTUREP0 STATE AND ZIP CODE O7 ❑ Acdressce ❑ thorizedFt. Collins, CO 80521 / "M — OPTIL SEOVI00S FOR ADDITIONEiL FEES _OO 1. Show to whom id dr.to deliivered 150 _ 4 RHTCRfJ GDAOF DELIVERYWith dclwery to addressee only 65¢ /RECEIPT 2. Steae to ohcm,dote end where delivered . 350- -mTuREDAddressL.eDthorizc.d Dh delivery to addressee only 8 5$ > �o Y _ 50dp 5 ADDRESS (Complete only if reques® co roquircd) • . . o PS rc7n1 3800 NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED— (Soo or,cr 1 �� it�g L'.IM U:DIl INTERNATIONAL MAIL c GPO 1072 o-u is i,-,:6 6 UNABLE TO DELIVER BECAUSE O J C 'S i111-S F I L3'ECEPll FOR CCEG' 51GG=GEn MALL--$ WO posy. 76-28 •::GPO 1975-O-568-047- PosTr^a. SENT TO OR DATE Windsor Land Co. sTCicyTion Robert- Schwartz Lo 8245 Louise Dr• cn • SEVDIR Complete item I Ind - _ Add your address m the 'RETURN TO ' space on P 0, STATE AND ZIP CODE 3 reverse — Denver, CO 80221 y 1. The following service is requested (check one). _ C?TIONAL SERVICES 40R_ aDDITIQCIAL FEES 1. Shows to whom end date delivered .. 150+ _ Show to whom and date delivered 15¢ OO prT EIN d With o delivery to addreccee only 65¢ ❑ Show to whom, date, & address of delivery.. 350 CoJRECEIPT 2. Stone to cat-':,dete a^d 1,tcre delivered 350 SECi1ICE5 With delivery to addressee only 85yt a I-1 x _ -- - - 5Dc� L RESTRICTED DELIVERY. o DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY Shrnv to whom .tad date delivered -- _-__-.- 65Q ® SPECIAL DELIVERY (otttro fco roquircd) • I NO INSURANCE COVERAGE MUDDED— (Soo oth; D RESTRICTED DELIVERY �� 'f .--Ar,,. !971 &a>I NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL GPO.1972 0- Show to whom, date, and address of delivery 850 2 ARTICLE ADDRESSED TO. x 7O GPT FOR CCC G3�TGf�GLDD MAD L---38(' (pans pm = Bruce D . & Vickie L. Fleming uuL,SENT TO POSTLI A Windsor, CO 80550 OR DA m _ Windsor Land Co - m 3 ARTICLE DESCRIPTION• STREET 1(9D NO. REGISTERED NO CERTIFIED NO INSURED NO. __ z PO,, STATE AND ZIP CODE 0 283917 OI (�(} to (Always obtain signature of addressee or agent) ( --Win A-SIcTICCAO�(�i 9 TID'JAL FEES m I have received the article describ d above. RGTurill 1. Stteos to whom cid data delivered 15000 mm SIGNATURE ❑ Addressee Authorized agent RECEIPT 4 With delivery to addressee only .. 65¢ CNJ 2. Stows to when,d_te end where delivered 350 SECVICES _ With delivery to addressee only . 850 z �- / o DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY 5OQ_ c 4. L l <' V ( s 4 `( l P t , KY,. ® CIAL DELIVERY (attire fco rag lied) m DATE OF DELIVERY PO C ` la •_=,rte 3�CD NO INSURANCE DC,._,,., (...J > �, A y �,t�� 1 \ -. 971 NOT FOR INTEL, ,.I.:••;L f',f 4,,cro ic; C Z - CO 5 ADDRESS (Complete only if requested) f 3 i V. b d. d. rn `.� �4�.) J/ - r c�D CO 0 Y C —i `� i' " 2 6 UNABLE TO DELIVER BECAUSE: CL a C o — r. f 0 14rkilt ALS 7 0 > o g F u p ? O O C 2 x b w u rn a GPO 1975-a-568-047 W , 0 o O¢ 0 76-28 H o y x -o c t Mt o z c ❑ 3 W o cr c .a+ W W Z ~ rn ` , N y I 61 O J 'le g•O cal 'O cG 'O co Z W c ,,D \ p $ H °c E� F. ° (n N a r ,5¢ , > a ..1 W O E a "❑ n r g o E ` to 3 3 v 3 U 3 no fxPal No a '0 - w o ` .. �O p ,/ ° $ O w Z 0 a - \ V O = > CC a 0 3 r, 3 v w `2i O W A ` \ o ri W W N 6 xi t J �' n 0 0) qU Lj ≤ v p_� E p a lC 4 w pull]u❑ ❑ ❑ z aQa Z w r'az -- r o °a z v G C7 • .--, N 07 K ►r N -,•O ai W PS Form 1811, Jar 1975 RETURN RECEIPT, REGISTERED, INSURED AND CERTIFIED MAIL a 4 A 41 ,.,less in the 'RETURN FO' space on i resuu t T1 , f','1,wrig sera ice is requested (check one• {Sirc,w to whom and date delivered _ __ 150 ,....... ..‘i ..„ -- ' a cs.•.s, to whom date, & address of delivery 350 '� • •,I K lt I%i) UF.LI\ F.RI- sh,s, to s,hom and date delvur'tt 63 I'L'I RIOTED DELIVERI- k� '-'o n i,i whon , daa and address ,f delivers 850 ! \ 2 ARTICLE ADDRESSED TO IN.,..._, 2, Clyde Davis T z Box 1242 A Greeley, CO 80631 m n 3 ARTICLE DESCRIPTION REGISTERED NO CERTIFIED NO I INSURED NO A 283912 m r-1 GI vi (Always obtain signature of addressee or agent) Wm I has' reeeised the article described above. ro SICNATHP' Art, ,... t , , I.I til Ar,, .e._'__.. cte items 1 ', ir. p] - ur address in the "RETURN TO ' space on -".., . 1 The following service is requested (check one ; s'a ill_ ( Show to whom and date delivered 150 ,i N ;1i r8 10 _ Si; ss to whom, date, & address of delivery. 350 /a+ '� N' >y NI ''y Ki..,"I RIC7 3:D DELIVERY. i--I }-ii �'� :-,h,,s. tri wh,irn ,rnd date deln,m 'd__--- 650 " U t(Di ,c ' RI,S I'RIG'l ED DELIVERY l Show to whom, date, and address of delver) 850 2 ARTICLE ADDRESSED TO: 1. d-ia q Robert & Veda Knox �'2 z R-9, 4200 E. Co. Rd. #30 4 d- v) m Ft. Collins, CO 80521 L'rt' I n 3 ARTICLE DESCRIPTION: µ Ii m �� REGISTERED NO CERTIFIED NO. INSURED NO. �yt m 283909 w0tri (Always obtain signature of addressee or agent) w m I hase received the article described above. Z CV — A — Authorize d agent GI SIGNATURE Addressee Q 7 -c=iiii C O / Cn D m 2 2 o (� G 4 — POSTMARK O GATE OF DELIVF '�� gym ^ ° AUG 21 ``�� z 5 ADDRESS (Complete only if requested) -n • SENDER omplte items 1 and 2 v Add yoo n ur address in the "RETURN TO ' space on m 1 o A reserve -Ai 3 0 1 The following service is requested (check one) m 6 UNABLE TO DELIVER BECAUSE: ® Show to whom and date delivered 150 o z C ° Show to whom, date, & address of delivery 35Q y < r 1 DELIVER ONLY TO ADDRESSEE and show to whom and date delivered 650 7 6-2 8 w DELIVER ONLY TO ADDRESSEE and show to whom, date, and address of 850 delisery -- --- - .� `tr t,. a+ N , tL 2 ARTICLE ADDRESSED TO' an W m C Q` b Windsor Land Co. O z - y ¢ J~ c c/o Robert Schwartz , v Z �? 2 . w a 3 w 8245 Louise Dr. • ,, V a°. m 80221 v O )I z o 'o -10 n 3 A 6.1YSESCRIcaN O rl N R m , REGISTERED NO CERTIFIED NO INSURED NO H . rd < u .ti N m 283945 c x — , -ts o o � d w m w m •-I z � � � ai O (Always obtain signature of addressee or agent) 7V Y o Q J C 01 fm co I have received the article described above. j - U ai ,-, -I-1 •,-i LL - a w 0 SIGNATURE cy H J n OF N I-q P a •= m d '. Ol Z Cr M 2 w-C o tr z o f c W ^q° ul w O a N c .< , > n z c 4 7y�,L/(J �P YffetW 3 H F w N X z A ] < E o oDAB r D Is5Rl Jr " " N O Q O a D im o m i ti-t • \ o ❑ °J) -8 �' z ° a _IOU 00 n lr s`s 3 ¢ U) R' ❑ m c, w ,i 'en 5 ADDRESS (Complete only if requested) 3 r. r o M . J ¢ ; ` a ! }w w m N o r r a r 2' r O•r-I O r-I O w t r v , 1~ p ¢ l0 I _ < z n �D ?a \ N v z O �¢ O N In ¢ U f� a O c c� - w .� Ks ,N I,, ., m 6 UNABLE TO DELIVER BECAUSE - I IA'S �, O - - Y,' , ,', RETURN RECEIPT, REGISTERED, INSURED AND CERTIFIED MAIL AF *GPO 1974 O-527-803 76-28 Hello